Post on 28-Mar-2023
LATE ROMAN SOPIANAE
A STUDY OF DIFFERENT INFLUENCES IN FOURTH CENTURY SOUTHERN PANNONIA
Zsolt R. Magyar
MA Thesis
Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield
2006
i
ABSTRACT
This study deals with different influences in Late Roman Sopianae, and focuses
especially to the fourth century. It aims to amend some methodological
problems that still exist in the literature; for example, however the geographical
position of Sopianae is not on the Balkans, this study proves that the city
belonged culturally to the Balkans. I also want to rethink the separation
between southern and northern Pannonia along with modern state borders. The
study proves that despite Sopianae lies in Hungary, hence, it traditionally
belongs to northern Pannonia, the real Sitz in Leben of the city is southern
Pannonia.
This work deals with western and oriental influences. It discovers that some
influences have oriental features though they actually arrived from west of the
city, and influences, which reached Sopianae from the Balkans usually have
western origin. In the background of the cultural and art historic influences, the
Christianity and the war between orthodoxy and Aryans played an important
role. Orthodoxy arrived to Sopianae from the west (Aquileia, Milan, Rome),
while the Aryan theories arrived from the southwest (Sirmium, Mursa). To
conclude the study discovers that fourth-century Sopianae rather belonged to
the west, but it had strong eastern influences.
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Special thanks to Csaba Pozsárkó from the University of Pécs for inviting me
to the recent excavation of the Early Christian Cemetery of Sopianae, Olivér
Gábor from the Janus Pannonius Museum (Pécs) for his advice and useful
comments and Erzsébet Nagy, also from the Janus Pannonius Museum, for
allowing me to take photographs of the collection and use them in this
dissertation. I also like to express my thanks to Renée Rozumilowicz and Clare
Lees for proofreading the manuscript.
iii
CONTENTS
List of Figures with Credits ........................................................... iv
Introduction.................................................................................... 1
Chapter 1: Historical and Geographical Analysis ........................... 9
The History of Sopianae in the Fourth Century AD......................................9 Contemporary Society................................................................................13 Halfway Between East and West................................................................15
Chapter 2: Christianity in Sopianae .............................................. 18
Arrival of Christianity into Pannonia..........................................................18 The Main Enemy: Aryanism ......................................................................20 The Conversion of Sopianae ......................................................................21 Early Christian Art.....................................................................................23
Chapter 3: Archaeological Evidence (Structures) ......................... 25
The Development of the Early Christian Cemetery ....................................25 The Wider Context.....................................................................................30 The Division of the Cemetery ....................................................................31 Funerary Buildings ....................................................................................33
The St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber ..................................................34 The Early Christian Mausoleum.............................................................42 The Burial Chamber of the Jar...............................................................49 Burial Chamber V..................................................................................51 Other Funerary Buildings ......................................................................54
Graves .......................................................................................................59
Chapter 4: Archaeological Evidence (Finds) ................................ 62
Articles with Inscriptions ...........................................................................62 Coins .........................................................................................................65 Sculpture ...................................................................................................65 Glass Objects .............................................................................................67 Metal Objects.............................................................................................69 Textiles......................................................................................................71
Conclusion ................................................................................... 73
Bibliography................................................................................. 77
iv
LIST OF FIGURES WITH CREDITS
Figure 1 Map of the middle regions of the Roman Empire in the fourth
century AD. After Marcellinus 1986, 502-503 (p. 2) Figure 2 The map of Pannonia in the fourth century. After Tóth 2003, 112
(p. 10) Figure 3 The Early Christian Cemetery of Sopianae. After Hudák-Nagy
2005, 11 (p. 26) Figure 4 The reconstruction of the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber with
its mausoleum. After Bartók et al. 2003, colour plate between p. 26 and 27 (p. 35)
Figure 5 Northern wall of the Sts Peter and Paul Burial Chamber. After
Hudák-Nagy 2005, Picture 18 (p. 37) Figure 6 The main fresco from the western wall of the Nis burial chamber.
Available at http://www.nis.co.yu/manastiri_i_crkve_grada_nisa/engleski/f17.html [Accessed at 25/09/2006 ] (p. 37)
Figure 7 The Jonah fresco on the eastern wall of St Peter and Paul Burial
Chamber in Sopianae. After Hudák-Nagy 2005, Picture 21 (p. 38) Figure 8 Jonah cycle from the Callistus catacomb. After Rutgers 2000, Fig.
32 (p. 38) Figure 9 Acanthus tendrils on the southern wall of the St Peter and Paul
Burial Chamber. After Hudák-Nagy 2005, Picture 16 (p. 38) Figure 10 The barrel vault of the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber. After
Hudák-Nagy 2005, Picture 26 (p. 41) Figure 11 The Early Christian Mausoleum, the part that can be seen on the
surface. After Bertók et al 2003, colour plate between p. 40 and 41 (p. 43)
Figure 12 The mausoleum in Marusinac, near Salona. Available at
http://www.solin.hr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=47&Itemid=124 [Accessed at 25/09/2006] (p. 43)
Figure 13 The fresco of Adam and Eve on the northern wall of the burial
chamber under the Early Christian Mausoleum of Sopianae. After Bertók et al. 2003, colour plate between p.40 and 41 (p. 44)
Figure 14 Wall painting from the Early Christian Mausoleum of Sopianae
depicting Daniel in the lions’ den. After Bertók et al. 2003, colour plate between p. 40 and 41 (p. 44)
v
Figure 15 Enthroned figure in the Early Christian Mausoleum of Sopianae.
After Hudák-Nagy 2005, 22 (p. 46) Figure 16 Northern wall of the Burial Chamber with the Jar. After Hudák and
Nagy 2005, Picture 10 (p. 50) Figure 17 Burial Chamber V, after excavation. After Gábor 2005, first screen
(p. 53) Figure 18 Fourth century octagonal baptistery at St Tecla, Milan. After
Harris 2003, 107 (p. 53) Figure 19 A possible Greek inscription on the inner wall of Burial Chamber
V. Photograph by Olivér Gábor (p. 54) Figure 20 The reconstruction of the Cella Trichora in Sopianae. After Bertók
et al. 2003, colour plate between p. 26 and 27 (p. 55) Figure 21 The cella trichora near the catacomb of Callistus, after restoration.
After Stevenson 1978, 30 (p. 55) Figure 22 The reconstruction of the Cella Septichora in Sopianae. After
Bertók et al. 2003, colour plate between p. 26 and 27 (p. 56) Figure 23 Reconstruction of the mosaic pavement of Burial Chamber X.
After Fülep 1984, Fig. 20 (p. 56) Figure 24 The different types of graves in the Early Christian Cemetery of
Sopianae. After Gosztonyi 1941, cited in Lengvári 2003, 61 (p. 60) Figure 25 Painted double tomb in the Early Christian Cemetery of Sopianae.
After Hudák-Nagy 2005, 14 (p. 61) Figure 26 Glass beaker with a Greek inscription found in Sopianae. After
Fülep 1984, Plate XXIV (p. 64) Figure 27 Glass cameo from the Early Christian cemetery of Sopianae with a
Greek inscription around a female head. Janus Pannonius Museum, Pécs, Inv. Nr. 612. Photograph by the author, with the kind permission of the Janus Panonius Museum (p. 64)
Figure 28 Gilded bronze statue of emperor Valentinian II. After Fülep 1984,
Plate XLI (p. 66) Figure 29 Sarcophagus Nr 1 in the Early Christian Mausoleum of Sopianae.
After Bertók et al. 2003, colour plate between p. 40 and 41 (p. 66) Figure 30 Glass cameo from Grave G/17. After Gáspár 2002, Figure 246 (p.
69)
vi
Figure 31 Statue of kriophoros from the catacombs of Rome. After Rutgers 2000, Figure 30 (p. 69)
Figure 32 Bronze lamp suspension found in burial chamber V. Available at
http://www.pecs.hu/english/index.php?foid=2&alid=8&oldal=krisztogram [Accesed 25/05/2006] (p. 70)
Figure 33 Bronze plates of a wooden casket found in Grave R/54. After
Fülep 1977, Plate 45 (p. 72)
1
INTRODUCTION
In this study, I will examine the different influences in fourth-century Sopianae
(Pécs, Hungary) on the basis of available historical, archaeological and art
historical data. The aim of this paper is to provide a detailed analysis about this
area, which has been mentioned several times in the literature, but never
chosen as the subject of a sole study. My aim is also to prove that Sopianae
was the northernmost part of southern Pannonia with strong links to this area.
This approach is not customary, because the traditional boundary between
southern and northern Pannonia in the literature is the river Drave, south of
Sopianae. However, I will prove in this paper that the river was not a cultural
boundary, and culturally Sopianae belonged rather to southern Pannonia, then
to northern Pannonia. Furthermore, Sopianae and southern Pannonia was a part
of a bigger region, the Balkans (Figure 1).
The reason why I have chosen the fourth century AD, as the period for my
research is that it was the most important period in the history of Sopianae,
when it became a provincial capital and considerable developments were
undertaken. Because of the greater wealth and richer material culture, we have
more evidence from this period than from Early Imperial times. The most
significant collection of archaeological and art historical data is centralised in
the Early Christian Cemetery of Sopianae, now a Word Heritage Site. The fact
that some of the cemetery buildings are open to the public makes the
circumstances of the research more convenient. Research about the city inside
the city walls has developed in the last fifteen years.
3
However, it is still poorly published. For example, we know of more than thirty
funerary buildings and approximately one thousand graves from the cemetery,
but we know only two fourth- century buildings from inside the city walls. In
addition, some earlier buildings were continually used in the fourth century as
well, but their publication is not adequately detailed.
I have chosen the subject of influences on the city because it shows the special
situation of southern Pannonia within the Late Roman Empire. That was the
time, when it was probably the most important area, as a western province, but
was very close the eastern provinces, and the home of the ‘Pannonian
Emperors’. Furthermore, the wider environment, the Balkans seems to be a
united region within the empire with its own traditions, influenced as much the
west as the east. Sopianae was the northernmost city of this cultural circle. It is
fascinating to undertake closer investigation on a microregion, like a city,
because the results can give us new information, not just about the history of
Late Roman Sopianae, but about the whole region, Pannonia and the Balkans.
4
For comparison I use several contemporary sites around the Empire, like the
catacombs in Rome, underground burial chambers in the Balkans, mausolea
from Britain, sarcophagi from Italy and the Noricum and glass artefacts from
all over the Empire to show which areas had considerable influence on
Sopianae. I will also deal with Christianity and its situation in the fourth
century, when it was rapidly developing into the sole religion of the Roman
Empire. However, I will also deal with Aryanism, the most powerful heresy,
which played an important role in the development and the consolidation of the
orthodox doctrine. From the point of my research, Aryanism is important,
because Sopianae was so close to one of the main strongholds of Aryanism.
This stronghold was Sirmium (Sremska Mitrovica, Serbia), the capital of
several Aryan emperors. For the Catholic orthodoxy, Pannonia was an
important territory, hence a strong propaganda was undertaken throughout the
fourth century from Rome and Milan via Aquileia towards Pannonia, which
can be seen clearly in the archaeological and art historical data. Unfortunately,
we do not have many historical sources about fourth-century Sopianae.
However, we can find historical evidence for some basic facts, like for the
presence of the governor’s court and for the logistical situation as an important
crossroad between east and west. Historical sources can also be used as
analogies for other parts of Pannonia, if used together with local archaeological
evidence from Sopianae.
The scholarly research of Roman Sopianae began as early as 1716 when the
first Early Christian burial chamber came to light. Sadly, it was destroyed
without exact recordings. However, in 1780, the beautifully painted St Peter
and Paul Burial Chamber (Burial Chamber I) was discovered, which drew the
5
site to the attention of the many scholars. In the twentieth century, up till the
seventies, István Möller, Ottó Szőnyi, Ejnar Dyggve, Gyula Gosztonyi and
Ferenc Fülep undertook important excavations; more and more buildings and
graves came to light. Because of their significance, the buildings, if the state of
preservation allowed, were restored and opened to the public. Recently, Gábor
Kárpáti, Zsuzsa Katona Győr, Olivér Gábor and Zsolt Visy led new
excavations (Fülep 1984, 9-11; Gábor 2005), which increased our knowledge
considerably about the lives of people in fourth-century Sopianae. However, a
kind of systematic publication that was presented by Ferenc Fülep about the
research undertook before the 1970s is still missing.
The first scholar who tried to interpret the unique remains in Sopianae was
Ejnar Dyggve. In his work (1935), he argues that the Sopianae burial chamber
(he knew only the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber) is a cubiculum, an
underground burial chamber, connected with other chambers. He thought that
in Sopianae, Early Christians built similar structures like in the catacombs in
Rome. This is right in the sense that the cubiculi in the catacombs developed
from the hypogea (underground burial chambers), but in the case of Sopianae
there were no loculi, narrow corridors which would connect the burial
chambers with each other. The scholarship after Dyggve stressed this
difference (for example Fülep 1984, Hudák and Nagy 2005).
The first exhausting work which detailed the results of all of the previous
excavations and contained the results of the author’s thirty years of research
was the monograph by Ferenc Fülep (1984), the late director of the Hungarian
National Museum. The book contains all the data that he could find about the
6
archaeology of Sopianae until the 1970s. Some of his results have been
questioned in the last twenty-two years, but until recent times this was the
starting point for every researcher, who wanted to undertake work on Roman
Sopianae. I also used this book as the starting point of my research, with
consideration of the new research available.
The results of the new excavations after Fülep’s research have only been partly
published since. A Masters dissertation by Krisztina Nagyné Hudák (2003)
contains useful information about art historic parallels to the Sopianae burial
chambers. From this study grew the most recent monograph about the Early
Christian Cemetery (Hudák and Nagy 2005). The latter work, although not as
detailed as Fülep’s monograph (1984), uses a wide range of works for
comparison and discusses the iconography of the wall paintings in detail.
Olivér Gábor (2005) also published a short summary about the recent
excavations.
I have to mention the limits of my research, which are the following. Firstly,
most of my evidence is from funerary context. Pearson (2005, 86) warns us
that funerary practices are not the only representations of social relations. In
funerals, power was radically re-ordered. However, this limit is necessary in
my case, because we know very little about life within the city walls. This is
unfortunate, because the size of the structures shows a clear bloom in the city
centre in the fourth century. Further research on this area can alter our
knowledge or could provide strong support for present ideas. The second
difficulty is terminology. The definition of eastern culture, hence the definition
of eastern influence in the fourth century is not exactly determined as, until AD
7
395, there was only one united empire. Even the linguistic differences were not
too considerable, at least within the upper classes, as many Latin writers chose
to write in Greek, and vice versa. For example, the Greek Ammianus
Marcellinus chose to write in Latin when he wrote his Res Gestae (Rolfe
1939). The language of the administration in the East was Latin until the sixth
century AD (Mango 2002, 5). Furthermore, even if we can demonstrate an
influence with eastern origin it could have arrived from the west to Sopianae,
hence it proves western influence, not eastern, from the city’s point of view. It
is also for this reason that the research of the eastern provinces in the fourth
century is surprisingly badly developed, compared with the western provinces.
The difficulty is that recent research does not mirror the real centres of the
fourth century, but rather the centres of the European Community before the
2004 expansion (Mango 2006). Recent literature is written rather on Western
Europe than Central or Eastern Europe, which was actually just as important in
the fourth century as the Western European provinces, if not more. The
situation in the earlier scholarship was even more biased towards Western
Europe. The third difficulty in my study – and this is common for the research
of Roman Pannonia – is that scholars tend to think in modern countries
(Migotti 1997). The territory of Roman Pannonia at the present is shared by
five countries (Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Serbia and Slovenia). Hence, the
research of different parts of Pannonia – which were in organic connections
with each other in the fourth century – now is being undertaken by scholars
from different countries. These scholars hardly communicate with each other
and tend to publish in their national language. In these countries, the
development of scholarship is at very different levels, hence it is hard to
compare the data. The Balkan war in former Yugoslavia in the 1990s destroyed
8
many archaeological sites and resulted a lack of funding in archaeology.
However, there are promising signs; for example, the research of southern
Pannonia (northern Croatia) has started to develop, but it is still much less
developed then the research of northern Pannonia (Hungary). The research of
another part of southern Pannonia (Serbia) was well developed before the
1990s. However, the war and Serbia’s slow recovery stopped the development
of the research.
Finally, I will describe the structure of this study. In Chapter 1, I discuss the
history of fourth century Sopianae within the context of its wider environment,
southern Pannonia. I also discuss special issues, like society and geographical
position because these are important to my approach. The second chapter is
about another important issue in fourth century Sopianae, Christianity. The
third and fourth chapter deal directly with the archaeological evidence dividing
them into two groups, such as structures and finds, for the sake of clearer
structure. The last chapter contains my conclusive interpretation of influences
in fourth century Pannonia based on the discussed evidence.
I keep the terminology which is used in the literature, even where it is clearly
wrong. Like the term of the Early Christian Mausoleum, which could be used
for nearly every Sopianae funerary building, or the Burial Chamber of the Jar,
which actually contains a painting of a jug not a jar. The reason for this is that
the literature always uses these terms or a translation of these terms.
9
CHAPTER 1
HISTORICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS
The territory of Pannonia was conquered by Augustus in the first century BC,
but the province was formed only after the Pannonian-Dalmatian revolt in AD
9. Trajan divided the province into Pannonia Superior (west) and Pannonia
Inferior (east) in 106 AD (Lenski 2002, 36), with the capitals of Carnuntum
(Bad Deutsch-Altenberg, Austria) and Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary). The
province’s main resources were Pannonian beer and timber. It was an
important commercial area, as the Amber Road ran through it, and the Danube
offered an excellent trading route from the Black Sea to the western provinces.
Pannonian landowners and soldiers played an important part in the history of
the Roman Empire, as many of them held high offices, such as governors and
emperors.
The History of Sopianae in the Fourth Century AD
The settlements on the site of Sopianae were conquered by the Romans in the
first century AD (Kárpáti 2003, 35). A Roman city was founded in the second
century from the separated settlements, but its golden age was the fourth
century. The majority of the scholars accept that Sopianae was a municipium
by the fourth century, at the latest. After the administrative reform by
Diocletian at the very end of the third century, Pannonia was divided into four
10
provinces: Pannonia I (northwest), Valeria (northeast), Savia (southwest) and
Pannonia II (southeast) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. The map of Pannonia in the fourth century AD.
11
Because of the constant Barbarian attacks along the Danube limes, the civil
administrations of the new provinces were established in the hinterland, while
the military governors (duces) kept their residence in the previous capitals,
along the Danube (Carnuntum and Aquincum). The status of the whole
province became more substantial in the fourth century, when it was one of the
main centres of imperial politics (Lenski 2002, 44). While Carnuntum and
Aquincum were in sharp decline, the new administrative centres in the
hinterland – Savaria (Szombathely, Hungary), Siscia (Sisak, Croatia), Sirmium
and Sopianae – enjoyed new developments (Lenski 2002, 44). Among them,
Sirmium was the most important as the centre point of the east-west axis of the
empire (Lenski 2002, 57). Sopianae became the headquarter of the civilian
governor (praeses) of the north-eastern Valeria province (Rolfe 1939; Fülep
1977b, 9). We do not know exactly when the new governor moved to the city.
Scholars have different opinions, but it was sometimes between 304 and 313
(Lenski 2002, 54).
This change in the status of the city was followed by investments from the
state. The first fifty years of the fourth century was a period of rapid growth
funded by imperial expense. Many buildings were reconstructed and a new
street grid was laid down. The palace of the governor and huge structure of one
bath complex was built (Lenski 2002, 42, Fülep 1984, 34-35). The size of the
walled city at that time was about 400 x 500 m according to Fülep (1984, 35).
The city was in the very middle of the financial flow of the empire. More than
two and a half thousand coins have been found, which is the greatest amount of
coins found within a single settlement in the area of modern Hungary (Nagy
1988, 231; Fülep 1984). However, the real beneficiaries of these developments
12
were only the retired soldiers and bureaucrats around the governor. Indigenous,
native inhabitants and the members of the traditional landed aristocracy did not
experience this economic growth.
The turning point was around the battle of Mursa (Ošijek, Croatia) in AD 351
between Constantius II and the usurper Magnentius (Lesnki 2002, 40-41).
From the middle of the fourth century, the imperial expenditures fell all over
the province (Fülep 1984, 44). ‘Evidently … all of Pannonia was losing its grip
on the prosperity it had enjoyed in the first half of the [fourth] century’ (Fülep
1984, 44). After the catastrophic invasion of the Visigoths in AD 376 the
decline was sharp, monetary trade ceased and many of the big buildings were
ruined. The Danube limes was dangerously weakened and the Roman soldiers
gave up their places to Barbarian, foederati people in the defence system (Visy
2003a). Maybe in connection with this at the end of the century, foederati
people moved next to Sopianae and established an oppidum in the vicinity of
the city (Nagy 1988, 242; Fülep 1977, 10). Within these new circumstances,
the Christian church became the main player in the local society funded by the
emperors and wealthy individuals. Local landowners remained in place, but the
Barbarian attacks caused them great loss. The evidence that the economic
power of the inhabitants still remained considerable are the mausolea with
beautifully painted burial chambers, which were built from the 370s in the
northern cemetery of the city, used mainly by Christians. We do not exactly
know who were the builders of these structures. Was it the church or wealthy
individuals? Both are likely possibilities.
13
After the Hun attack in AD 408/409, the upper strata of the society fled to
Italy. The church also lost its economic might, without financial support. No
more burial chambers were built after that time. However, one of the existing
ones (Burial Chamber XIII) was converted to a chapel for liturgical use
between 410 and 420 (Fülep 1984, 283-34), as a sign of the survival of the
Christian community in the city. The Christian cemetery remained in use in the
first decades of the fifth century but the handover of the province to the Huns
in 422 or in 433 at the latest, terminated the Roman administration in the city
(Nagy 1988).
Contemporary Society
The classes of the local society contained native Celts, Italian settlers,
Dalmatian families, immigrants from the Danube provinces, and families from
other parts of Pannonia. This mixed local society was the result of the good
commercial connections and trade routes, which run through the city. Sopianae
had well-established commercial connections and advanced economic links
with Italy, Gaul, Germany, Rhaetia, the Balkans, Constantinople and even with
the Barbaricum on the other side of the Danube (Fülep 1984, 258).
Regarding social classes, landowners, retired soldiers and their families,
traders, craftsmen and bureaucrats were all present locally (Fülep 1984, 276).
The upper strata – rich tradesmen, landowners, high-rank bureaucrats and
high-ranking soldiers – built bigger and richer houses during the fourth century
(Fülep 1964, 11). There are richer finds from the fourth century, compared
with the previous two centuries, which are the signs of material and intellectual
14
prosperity at that time. The residential buildings in the city are also bigger from
that time (Fülep 1977b, 9-10). This partly new, rich aristocracy converted
quickly to Christianity. Higher and lower ranking people lived together in Late
Antique Sopianae. The suggestion of Gábor (2003, 63) that the aristocracy had
residence inside the walls, and the plebs lived outside the walls in timber
houses is not satisfactory. However, it is true that signs of industrial activity
were found outside the city walls and it is likely that low rank tenant farmers
lived around the city. The insulae found in the city were clearly residences for
lower rank people. The rural area around Sopianae within its administrative
territory was extensive. Nine extended villa settlements had been found so far
(Fülep 1964, 11) around the Roman city, and we do not know exactly how far
the territory of Sopianae spread. The new leading stratum of Sopianae, the
bureaucrats, was not homogenous. At the top of the local career ladder was of
course the governor (praeses). The praeses worked together with civil officers
(officiales). Among them, the most important was the curator, who was
responsible for financial transactions (Alföldy 2000, 182-190). Among the
local aristocrats, there were the members of the municipal council. However to
be a member of a municipal council in Late Antiquity was a bad business, as
one had to supplement the tax income if it had not reached the expected level,
which it usually did not. For that reason, the financial power was in the hands
of the landowners, who escaped from municipal obligations (Mango 2002, 72).
This landowner-aristocracy had a considerable influence on civic life.
15
Halfway Between East and West
The main military road between Constantinople (founded in AD 324) and
Trier, imperial capitals of the east and west ran through the city in the fourth
century (Fülep 1984, 12-13). The traffic from the east flowed through Sirmium,
the base of the metropolitan bishop of Pannonia, which lies only two days
walking distance from Sopianae. From Italy, an important trade route between
Milan, Aquileia, Poetovio (Ptuj, Slovenia) and Mursa offered a good
connection to Sopianae and connected the city with another western imperial
capital, Milan, the seat of bishop Ambrose. Aquileia was the main starting
point for immigration from Italy. The Italian city is partly responsible for
Pannonia being a western province politically, linguistically and culturally
(Migotti 1997, 104). The metropolitan bishop of Aquileia also had a
considerable influence on Pannonia and Sopianae. This road from Italy joined
to the Trier – Constantinople road at Mursa. The limes road along the Danube
was also within a day’s walking distance and linked the city to the Danube,
another important route between east and west (Fülep, 1984, 13). In addition,
of course the city had good connections with other important Pannonian cities
like Carnuntum, Savaria, Siscia and Aquincum. On the other hand, the Balkan
provinces (Dalmatia and Moesia) were so close to Sopianae. Through these
provinces oriental travellers arrived to the city via land and via water (from the
Adriatic coast). The crossing point at the river Drave at Mursa was only one
day’s walking distance away from Sopianae, hence the city was in the way of
every eastern traveller who wanted to cross the Drave towards the west.
16
The geographical position of the city made it an important transit station
between east and west, especially in the fourth century AD. This statement is
supported by the Itinerarium Antonini (23-24, cited in Fülep 1984, 12), which
says Sopianae was an important crossroad. The military road was used by
merchants as well as soldiers. Merchants came from the east and the west to
the city. The closeness of the Amber Road, which ran from Italy, through
Savaria to the Baltic coast providing a trading highway from the fourth century
BC onwards, was also important for Sopianae.
From the position of Sopianae, we can predict strong eastern and western
influences. Because the city was close to the so-called Jireček-line, the
language boundary of the western Latin-speaking and the oriental Greek-
speaking part of the Empire (Kovács 2001, 57), it would be not surprising if the
two cultures would show a balance in the surviving archaeological and art
historical data. This is the conclusion of Krisztina Nagyné Hudák (2003, 69),
as well:
A kapcsolatok irányát meghatározta, hogy a 4. sz. elejétől 378-ig
gyakorta élt a közeli Sirmiumban a teljes császári udvar, emiatt
Sopianae a művészeti élet pezsgésében élt. A város, csakúgy, mint
egész Dél-Pannonia az itáliai és a balkáni kulturális hatások fő
találkozóhelyének tekinthető. Sopaianaeban az itáliai és balkáni
hatások „eredőjeként” jellegzetes sírépület forma jött létre, alatta
festett sírkamrával.
In my translation:
The directions of the connections were determined, by the fact, that
from the beginning of the fourth century until AD 378 the whole
17
imperial family often had a residence in the nearby Sirmium. For that
reason Sopianae had a bustling artistic life. The city, just as the whole
of southern Pannonia, can be considered as the primary meeting point
of the Italian and Balkans influences. In Sopianae, as the results of the
Italian and Balkans influences, a typical funerary edifice, with painted
burial chamber came into existence.
I accept this statement as a hypothetical starting point, however, I state that
most of the scholars agree that Pannonia was primarily a province belonging to
the territory of the western emperor, with ‘variegated and mixed influences’
(Migotti 1997, 104). This is mirrored for example in names as, at least in the
southern areas, western names dominate the epigraphic records (Migotti 1997,
105).
18
CHAPTER 2
CHRISTIANITY IN SOPIANAE
The fourth century is about the victory of Christianity in the Roman Empire.
The official recognition of Christianity started in the second decade of the
century around the battle of the Milvian bridge in AD 312. From then
Christianity received generous support from the emperors and the aristocracy.
However, until the time of Julian (AD 361-363) Pagan religions existed
together with Christianity. It was, after the death of the last Pagan emperor that
Christianity quickly reached the primary position amongst the religions
practiced in the empire, which led to AD 395, when Theodosius declared
Christianity as a state religion, and forbade every other cult.
Arrival of Christianity into Pannonia
Christianity reached Roman Pannonia in the third century AD (Fülep 1984).
There is possible evidence for its earlier presence, but it is questionable (see for
example Katona Győr 2000; Gáspár 2002; Migotti 1997). Oriental religions
were popular in the province; several remains of the Mithras cult and the cult
of the Sol Invictus (the Unconquerable Sun) have been found. The huge Iseum
in Savaria shows a strong centre of the Egyptian religion. Jews arrived to the
province from Syria and Asia Minor (Katona Győr 2000, 30). It is likely that
Christianity arrived through the same routes, however one should also consider
the possibility of the Christianisation of the province from Aquileia (Morton
19
1996, 13; Tóth 1991, 743). The most likely answer is that the conversion
originated from both directions, with an emphasis on Orientals. This is
supported by the fact that the first known Pannonian martyrs were from the
Greek speaking east (Katona Győr 2000). This duality is mirrored by the dual
iurisdiction of a part of Pannonia by Aquileia and Sirmium.
The first details about Pannonian martyrs are from the time of Valerian (AD
253-260). Some of them – like the quattuor sancti coronati (the four crowned
saints) and Quirinius, the bishop of Siscia – became very popular after their
remains were transited to Rome (Migotti 1997; Mócsy 1974). There were
plenty of martyrs in Sirmium, with an important cult, too. (Mócsy 1974, 160-
162).
Among the Pannonian bishoprics, Sirmium was the most important. The bishop
of Sirmium was the metropolita (archbishop) of Pannonia, (Nagyné Hudák
2003, 74-75) and because Sirmium was under the authority (iurisdictio) of the
bishop of Rome, the patriarch of the West, the cultural programme of the
Italian church was strong in Pannonia. This was accelerated by the influence
and authority of Aquilea (dual with Sirmium) over some part of the province
and the effort of the powerful bishop of Milan, Ambrose.
20
The Main Enemy: Aryanism
The main enemy of orthodox Christianity was Aryanism, founded by Aryus, a
presbiter in Constantinople in the beginning of the fourth century. His teaching
became rapidly successful in the east. In AD 325 the council of Nicea-
Constantinople rejected his ideas. However, the Aryans spread all over the
Empire and many of their leaders had a strong influence on emperors. In fact,
most of the Christian emperors of the fourth century were Aryans. Pannonia
became an Aryan province too by the 340s (Fülep 1984, 279). A good
illustration of the strength of the Aryan clergy in Pannonia is that when St
Martin, as a bishop of Tours visited his parents in Savaria, he had to escape
from the Aryan clergy (Gáspár 2002, 119). In addition, the immigrant
Visigoths and other foederati peoples were Aryans (Migotti 1997, 4-5). In the
360s Aryanism started to withdraw from the province. The orthodox, western
church launched a new iconographic program with the support of pope
Damasus (AD 366-384), together with the re-establishment of the martyr’s cult
in the Roman catacombs (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 38, Rutgers 2000, 21).
Furthermore, Ambrose of Milan made a strong effort to win back Pannonia to
the orthodoxy. Sirmium, especially, was very important for him. To win back
the city was his main aim, because it was the place of the imperial court several
times; hence, it played an important role in the imperial politics, in which the
Christian church had strong interest (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 64). The strong anti-
Aryan effort in the province from the 360s was not only a theological argument
but political as well, as Rome and the Italian church were against the
interlocking of the ecclesiastical power and the emperor (Nagyné Hudák 2003,
64). Amongst the churches of the eastern part of the empire, Aryanism was
21
popular, and the interlocking of the ecclesiastical and worldly power was
stronger (cesaropapism). Sirmium was an important battlefield between the
two ideologies and, for a while, it became a stronghold of Aryanism, while the
non-Aryan churches became a small opposition in the city. Mursa also played
an important role in Aryanism, as Valens of Mursa was a powerful Aryan
bishop.
The Conversion of Sopianae
In Sopianae, the first evidence for Christians is from the fourth century, and the
belief in Christ gradually superseded other faiths. These changes did not
happen from one day to another. Pagan sanctuaries of Jupiter, Juno and
Hercules stood near the city centre and they remained in use in the fourth
century (Fülep 1984, 26-27) until the 370s. The reason behind this was that the
Pagan and Christian religions and politics had a careful balance until the reign
of Julian (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 27). Emperor worship did not halt under the
Christian emperors, either. Gilded bronze statues of Constans I (Fülep 1964,
13) and Valentinian II (Fülep 1984, Plate XLI) had been found in the city. Jews
were also present, as the grave of a Jewish woman, found in the Early Christian
Cemetery, proves. However it is likely that they only had a small community
(Katona Győr 2000, 30).
In the theological argument between Aryans and orthodoxy, Sopianae received
dual influences. It is likely that Aryanism played an important role in the
Christianity of the city, because of the closeness of Sirmium and Mursa (Fülep
22
1984, 279). However, the contra effect was also strong from the seats of Siscia
and Aquileia, which were the strongholds of the orthodoxy. Finally, the
influence of nearby Rome, with the bishop of Rome, the pope, who was the
main enemy of Aryanism at all times, should also be considered.
The spread of Christianity in Sopianae corresponds with the establishment of
the governor’s headquarters (Fülep 1984, 278). Dating from that time, the first
Christian graves have been found with east-west orientation. The boom of
Christianity and the emergence of Early Christian burials were under
Constantine (Fülep 1984, 278-79). Unfortunately, there have been no historical
sources found about Aryanism in Sopianae, or for a presence of an Aryan
bishop. Nagy, (1939 cited in Gáspár 2002, 67) mentions an Aryan bishop,
called Paulus, whose bishopric is not known, as possible Sopianaean bishop,
but his evidence is not satisfactory. However, it is possible that a bishop had
residence in the city. Overall, we should not forget, it was a provincial capital,
and the usual practice in the fourth century was, that in provincial capitals there
were bishoprics (Harries 1987, 807). At least this was the case in the other
three provinces of Pannonia (the bishopric of Siscia, Sirmium and Savaria).
However, until now no direct archaeological or historical evidence has been
found about the existence of a bishopric. On the other hand, in the vicinity of
the city there is no evidence for Christianity, which could mean that the peasant
farmers and half-slave tenants kept the Pagan religion longer than the
inhabitants of the city.
Regarding the social status of the Christians in Sopianae by the second half of
the fourth century large funerary edifices were being built in the Early
23
Christian Cemetery, which show the wealth of local Christians and the Church
(Fülep 1984, 279). It is proven, that by the second half of the fourth century
AD, the leading stratum of the local society was Christian. Their burial
practices were similar to Rome, where from the fourth century the rich started
to bury their dead in beautifully painted burial chambers within the catacombs
(Rutgers 2000, 70-71). Nevertheless, it does not mean that all Christians were
as wealthy; there were about a thousand simple Christian brick graves in
Sopianae.
Early Christian Art
The Early Christian art in Pannonia had strong influences from Italy (mostly
from Rome via Milan and Aquileia) for the reasons discussed above (Nagyné
Hudák 2003, 62). However this influence was not direct in every case.
Victorinus of Poetovio, a church father and a Pannonian martyr in the fourth
century had a strong Aquileian influence. From Poetovio his ideas spread to
eastern Pannonia then to the whole province, and reached Sirmium (and
Sopianae). The Christus Victor (the Victorious Christ) idea is present in
Victorinus’ apologetic writings in the Pannonian martyr’s acts and on the
Sopianae frescos (Heidl, 2005).
After the establishment of Constantinople, the oriental influence in Pannonia
became stronger, but there was always strong oriental influence in eastern
Pannonia (Migotti 1997, 104), which can be seen in the Early Christian art as
well. It is easy to recognise these changes on frescos, where the figure loses its
connection with the background, as in oriental art. Before the middle of the
24
fourth century the impressionistic style was important in Early Christian art.
Later on, Greek influences such as strong brush touch and strong contours in
depicting of the neck and the arms, rotund, fleshy face, vivid, small eyes, and
mellow hair which usually hangs to the temporal are the features of that
(Nagyné Hudák 2003, 26-27). On the other hand, the western artistic influence,
which brought together the theological and political program of the orthodoxy
between 350 and 375, the so called stilo bello also arrived to Sopianae. An
important motif at that time was the depiction of Paradise, like on the barrel
vault of the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 27). This
new style can be seen on the catacomb paintings in Rome as well, where the
frescos are more constructive, the build-up of the figures is more closed, and
the shapes are bounded. A popular figure is the orans, the praying figure
(Kádár 1959), like on the fresco of Daniel in the Lions’ Den in Sopianae, in the
Early Christian Mausoleum (see below).
General features of fourth century Christian art are thematic systematisation,
bright colours and elegance. However, the emerging Christian tradition still
uses the classical tradition and the equipment of Pagan art (Rutgers 2000, 84):
Dionysian imagery like vine tendrils slued to columns, flower frames, peasants,
plastic figures, various frame motifs were very popular (Nagyné Hudák 2003,
26). Another important feature is that depictions of Christ are always
accompanied by symbols, like in the Sopianae frescos in the Early Christian
Mausoleum or in the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber (see Kádár 1959).
25
CHAPTER 3
ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE (STRUCTURES)
The Early Christian Cemetery lies close to the possible western gate of the
Roman city wall (Figure 3) near a road that leads to the north, traces of which
were found at the junction of Szt. István Square and Alkotmány Street (Fülep
1984, 15-16). The site of the cemetery follows the usual Roman practice,
which forbade burial inside the city wall. The use of the site of the Early
Christian Cemetery as a burial ground started in the third century AD.
The Development of the Early Christian Cemetery
The cemetery started as a Pagan burial place. Pagan graves (R/36-R/38) were
found east of the Burial Chamber VIII and among the later Christian graves as
well (Fülep 1984, 60; the source does not identify their exact location). From
the other part of the cemetery (the “Nagy Lajos” cluster), third century
cremation burials have recently come to the light. These graves did not contain
urns; the deceased was buried in a hole, and the grave goods were broken
before the cremation. This practice is Barbarian, hence it is likely these graves
were used by Barbarian immigrants or local native people (Gábor 2003, 67-
68).
26
Figure 3. The Early Christian Cemetery of Sopianae. Key: 1 Cella Trichora, 2 StPeter and Paul Burial Chamber, 3 Burial Chamber V, 4 Cella Septichora, 5 BurialChamber of the Jar, 6 Early Christian Mausoleum, 7 Burial Chamber XIII, 8painted double tomb. The dots show individual graves, the grey area is the area ofthe UNESCO Word Heritage Site.
27
From the first decades of the fourth century, east-west oriented inhumation
burials appeared amongst the burials. Fülep (1984, 153) makes a distinction
between east-west and west-east orientation (regarding the place of the head).
The west-east orientation became popular in Gaul and the Rhineland in the
second half of the fourth century (Effros 2003, 189), which corresponded with
a lack of grave goods. The same process happened in the province of Pannonia
and Moesia. The reason behind it is that, according to Early Christian beliefs,
when the deceased arise on Judgement Day they can face towards Christ, who
will come from the east (Pearson 2005, 6). To identify Christ with the sun, or
rather to think about the sun as the symbol of Christ was a popular belief in
Christianity, hence it was sensible the he left this world in an eastwardly
direction and would come back from there (see Acts 1:9). However, in
Sopianae the east-west orientation was more popular. This might have been a
local custom (Fülep 1984, 153). It is not unusual that small areas, even within a
city, have a local cultural identity and a special burial custom. This could relate
to continuing pre-Roman ideas (Jones 1987, 829).
The east-west oriented graves contained more grave goods, than the west-east
oriented. In the case of the west-east oriented graves the low number or lack of
coins, a lack of pottery, a decreased amount of jewellery and the presence of a
large number of glass vessels is typical. West-east graves are also later, hence
it seems that the local custom of east-west burial slowly gave up its place to the
general Christian practice.
In the second half of the fourth century, rich mausolea were built in the
cemetery with underground burial chambers (hypogeia). This date follows
28
similar developments in the Roman catacombs, as the majority of the
catacombs were constructed only after Constantine (Rutgers 2000, 68).
Underground burial chambers (hypogeia) were usually used by a family or a
particular sect, or group (Curl 1993, 65; Rutgers 2000, 60). The origin of the
painted hypogeia was not Christian, but occurred naturally as an extension of
mausolea in the densely populated cemeteries of Rome and elsewhere around
the Mediterranean. One of the first examples of that is Clodius Hermes’
subterranean family chamber in the Sebastiano catacomb in Rome (Rutgers
2000, 58-60). To paint a tomb was also a Pagan practice; well-known examples
are the Isola Sacra cemetery in Rome and the Torre de’ Sciavi on the Via
Praenastrina (Curl 1993, 56-57).
No clear evidence for martyr graves was found in Sopianae. However, this
does not mean that there were no martyr graves in the Sopianae cemetery.
There are plenty of possibilities. The burial chamber of St Peter and Paul is a
possible martyr (re)burial. It has a special niche, which usually holds relics.
The explanation for the absence of these relics could be that it was a usual
practice to transfer the earthly remains of the martyrs to another place (for
example, during the troubles of the fifth century, relics were transferred from
Pannonia to Italy). It is also possible that the community forgot about the local
martyrs, as could have happened in the case of Burial Chamber XIII (see
above), or did not mark them specially, as was the practice empirewide until
the time of Damasus. In the Roman catacombs, which are the closest parallel of
the Sopianae Christian necropolis martyr graves did not differ from other
burials until the time of pope Damasus. Just after that time, the names of the
29
martyrs was collected and altars placed in mausolea containing the relics of the
martyrs (Rutgers 2000, 77-78).
By the end of the fourth century, the cemetery reached to the area of the former
city. Two Roman burials were found on Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Street and within
the area of the postal buildings within the area of the Roman city (Katona Győr
2000, 26; Fülep 1977a, 10). However, this date is a bit early for that, as even in
Rome burials within the walls started to appear only from the fifth century
(Curl 1993, 70). Fülep argues (1977a, 10) that the area around the postal
building remained inhabited at the end of the fourth century. It is one of the
tasks of further research to check Fülep’s dating evidence for these graves.
However, burials continued after the Roman period outside the walls. For
example, Graves A I-III are post-Roman burials, found under the present day
Cathedral (Fülep 1984, 57).
The use of the cemetery did not cease with the end of the Roman
administration. The cemetery remained in use (Fülep 1984), but as a result of a
sharp decline in the wealth of local peoples or rather because of the emigration
of the upper classes, the rich funerary buildings collapsed, as nobody looked
after them. Later on some burial chambers were used for housing as the
postholes found from the Migration period show. Grave robbers were present.
One of them opened sarcophagus No. 1 in the Early Christian Mausoleum (see
above) with an axe; the axe was found in situ (Fülep 1984). However, the site
of the cemetery, even if it was out of use by the eleventh century, became the
centre of the Christian medieval city. It cannot be accidental that the medieval
cathedral of the first Hungarian bishopric was built in the richest part of the
30
cemetery. A similar process happened in Western Europe, for example in St
Albans, Britain and Tours, France (Jones 1987, 826), but the development of
Christianity was more continuous in these areas then in the Carpathian basin. It
is remarkable, however, that in these two examples the centres of these
medieval urban centres were a funerary basilica. This leaves open the question
of whether the Cella Septichora (see above) was a funerary basilica or if there
was a funerary basilica under the Cathedral, even if there is still no evidence
for it besides an etymological one. The Early Medieval Sopianae was known
by the Frankish historians as Quinque Ecclesiae (or in some sources: Quinque
Basilicae) (Visy 2003b, 122), hence it is likely that there were early medieval
basilicae in the city, probably originating in the Late Roman period.
The Wider Context
The burial chambers in the Roman catacombs, known as cubiculi, in the
beginning were separate underground units (as it can be seen today in the
catacomb of Vilvia) just like in Sopianae, but they later were interconnected
with underground tunnels, known as loculi (Rutgers 2000, 62). The Christian
hypogeum, underground burial chamber was invented in the third century AD
in Rome, and from there, spread to the central and eastern Mediterranean
provinces (Rutgers 2000, 63-64). Underground cemeteries were exceptional in
the western provinces, like Gaul, Germany, Spain or Britain. The norm in these
areas was the open cemetery, to oppose the popularity of underground burial in
Italy and the central and eastern Mediterranean (including the Balkans) (Jones
1987, 825-826). It seems that even the origin of this burial could be oriental,
derived from Palestine or Syria; it became popular in Rome as early as the
31
second century AD (Nicolai et al. 1999, 14-16). From Rome and Italy, it spread
to the east. Hence from the point of Sopianae, this underground burial is not
necessarily a sign of eastern influence. The case is rather that Sopianae was a
part of a Balkan cultural circle, which included areas in the geographical centre
of the empire, from both the authority of west and the east. These areas adopted
the Italian example in the fourth century.
However, there were other general features of Early Christian burial. As far as
Poundbury in Britain, plastered Early Christian graves were found, just like in
Sopianae and all over the Balkans. Among the graves, small buildings stood
over graves, with wall paintings portraying humans (probably saints) like small
mausolea or shrines over the graves. The main difference is that this cemetery
did not contain burial chambers, as was common in the west, where the open
burials were standard (Jones 1987, 826).
The Division of the Cemetery
In the Early Christian cemetery by the second half of the fourth century four
clusters had developed. The central area of the cemetery was the area around
the modern Cathedral (see Figure 3), the second group was around Burial
Chamber XIII (Figure 3/7), the third was around the Vörösmarty Street and the
last one was the group found recently under the courtyard of the ‘Nagy Lajos’
Grammar School (Gábor 2003, 67). From the fourth century, no cremation
burial with urns and no burial with north-south orientation has been found
(Gábor 2003, 67). The reason behind separated cemetery clusters could be
different social status, religious beliefs or ethnic origins (Pearson 2005, 13-17).
32
It seems from the high density of rich mausolea and other funerary buildings
(Cella Trichora, Cella Septichora), that the area around the present day
cathedral was a burial place for higher rank people, or a designated area for the
local (and wealthy) church. The cluster around the Burial Chamber XIII was a
possible burial place for a Christian sect (Fülep 1984), because only one
building was found in a full excavation of the area, and the graves had a strong
connection to that building. But because the mausoleum was rebuilt as a chapel
in the beginning of the fifth century it is possible that these were one of the first
burials ad sanctos in the cemetery. There is a principal burial in the church,
under the altar. This could be the body of a sect leader but could also be the
body of a forgotten, local saint. In the latter case, the cluster is not for a
separated group, but a group of graves around an early church. There was a
unique children’s cemetery next to this cluster as well (Fülep 1984). We cannot
tell too much about the cluster around Vörösmarty Street; results of his
excavation have not yet been published. Finally, there is the “Nagy Lajos”
cluster among the numerous earth graves and brick graves. A mausoleum was
found here in 1716, however the finds and the documentation of that
excavation have been lost, so we only know the location of the building (Gábor
2003, 64-65). Still, in this cluster around Grave No. 20 a possible cella
harmonia was found and two more funerary buildings. One of these buildings
was built on a female cremation burial with rich grave goods from the fourth
century and the second one was a cenotaph with no grave goods or body
(Gábor 2003, 67-68). Most of the burials from the fourth century were east-
west oriented (Gábor 2003, 68). Grave No. 20 itself had a burned wall, and
Grave No. 108 is a burial with a wooden bucket, which was a Germanic
practice (Gábor 2003, 69). Gábor (2003, 69) suggests that these graves could
33
be burials for converted Barbarians, who kept their own traditions. This,
‘Barbarian’ part was the richest part in the “Nagy Lajos” cluster.
Funerary Buildings
More than thirty funerary buildings are known from the Early Christian
Cemetery of Sopianae from the fourth century, many of them were decorated
with wall paintings. Some of the decorations were lost during the excavations,
or were found in a very deteoriated state. However, five funerary structures are
open to the public (The St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber, The Burial Chamber
of the Jar, the Early Christian Mausoleum, Burial Chamber XIII and a painted
double grave).
On the one hand, the subjects and the artistic style of the wall paintings show a
close relationship with the paintings in the Roman catacombs. On the other
hand the Sopianae burial chambers belong to the Macedon hypogeum type
(Nagyné Hudák 2003, 65-66) which occurs in a region that’s centre is in the
Balkans. Sites belonging to this artistic circle are: Serdica (Sofia, Bulgaria),
Diocletianopolis (Hissar, Bulgaria), Ossenovo (Bulgaria), Philippopolis
(Plovdiv, Bulgaria), Salonica (Thessalonica, Greece), Naissus (Nis, Serbia),
Beska (Serbia) and Sopianae (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 65-66). Within this circle
in Cibalae (Vinkovci, Croatia), close to Sopianae, two fourth-century oriental
type underground burial chambers with possible mausolea became known.
Also within the same area, another fourth-century burial chamber was found
near Aquae Balissae (Daruvar, Croatia) with a sarcophagus decorated with vine
tendrils (Migotti 1997, 43). The decoration with vine tendrils was so popular in
34
Sopianae in the second and third centuries on epigraphic evidence (Fülep and
Sz. Burger 1974) and it is likely that it remained popular in the fourth century
as well; however, we do not have any epigraphic evidence from the fourth
century, so we cannot prove or disprove this (see below). Sopianae seems to be
the northernmost settlement of this circle, as no painted burial chambers were
found north of the city in Pannonia (Tóth 1991, 744). All together, regarding
the subjects of the paintings, the close relationship with Rome is shown by the
popularity of biblical themes, which was a usual practice in the catacombs
(Rutgers 2000, 85-117; Stevenson 1978, 63-108; Nagyné Hudák 2003, 68).
The St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber
The St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber (Figure 3/2 and Figure 4) is a
rectangular building. The mausoleum was built precisely above the burial
chamber. Unfortunately, the mausoleum and its floor were destroyed during the
nineteenth century (Hudák and Nagy 2005, 31). However, the burial chamber
with its paintings were restored. Heidl (2005) dates the building to between AD
397 and AD 406. Ejnar Dyggve (1935, 15-16) found several parallels to this
building, like the mausoleum in Teurnia (Noricum), or structures in Marusinac
(near Salona, modern Solin in Croatia) and Sibenik (Croatia). Nagyné Hudák
(2003, 13) and Gáspár (2002, 74) mention the oriental, Palestinian origin of
this kind of burial chamber. However, the eastern origin of this style does not
mean that the Sopianae building has an eastern influence. The fashion of this
burial chamber was already popular in Italy at the end of the fourth century and
the paintings show similarities with the Roman catacomb paintings. It is more
likely that the style of that building arrived from the west or the Balkans. Here
35
are some parallels of the architectural elements of the building. The barrel vault
has its parallels in Nis and Thessalonica. The figure of Eve, the hairstyle and
the touch of the brush is similar to the painting of Finding Moses in cubiculum
B in the Via Latina catacomb in Rome. Another parallel is the St Mark and
Marcellinus catacomb. The acanthus decoration of the barrel vault is similar to
the wall painting in the house under the St John and Paul monastery. The
depiction of the garden of Paradise is similar to the Theodorus aula in
Aquileia.
Figure 4. The reconstruction of the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber with its mausoleum.
36
The wall paintings of the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber in Sopianae are the
peak of Early Christian art in Pannonia (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 38). The
following frescoes decorate the walls of the burial chamber. The main,
northern wall depicts Christ with the apostles, Peter and Paul. The southern
wall is decorated with various tendril motifs. The eastern wall’s paintings
include the depiction of Adam and Eve under the Tree of Knowledge, and the
representation of Jonah. On the western wall, we can see Mary and the Magi
and a representation of Noah. On the barrel vault there are four portraits in
medallions among the representation of Paradise.
The main fresco, depicting St Peter and Paul on the northern wall (Figure 5) of
the burial chamber is related to catacomb paintings and the catacomb art (Fülep
1984, 39). On a sarcophagus from the St Sebastian catacomb the same scene
can be seen: the two apostles adore the Crux Invicta (the Unconquerable Cross)
(Kádár 1941, 67). The Crux Invicta, a Chi-Rho symbol in a wreath, with six
green stars inside can be found in Naples in the San Giovanni in the Fonte
Dome mosaic (Kádár 1939, 5), but also in the Callistus catacomb (Kádár 1939,
5). The closest parallel however is the representation of St Peter and Paul in the
burial chamber of Nis (Figure 6). Depicting the two apostles has strong
connection with the orthodox iconography of Rome against Aryanism. The
depiction of Christ and the two main apostles was the symbol of Rome in the
second part of the fourth century (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 47).
37
Figure 5. Northern wall of the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber.
Figure 6. The main fresco from the western wall of the Nis burial chamber.
38
Figure 7. The Jonah fresco on the eastern wall of Sts Peter and Paul Burial Chamber in Sopianae.
Figure 8. Jonah cycle from the Callistus catacomb.
Figure 9. Acanthus tendrils on the southern wall of the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber.
39
The representation of Mary and the magi on the western wall is the same as the
adoratio magorum in the Domitilla catacomb (Kádár 1939, 31), and also as in
the adoratio magorum in the St Peter and Marcellinus catacomb (Nagyné
Hudák 2003, 39). It is likely that the artist was a member of a workshop which
painted the painting of the Finding of Moses in the cubiculum B in the Via
Latina catacomb in Rome, because of the same windswept effect in Mary’s
hair (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 40). However, on the Theodosius obelisk in
Constantinople, the hairstyle of Emperors Gratian and Arcadius is similar to
the hairstyle of the magi (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 7).
The fresco of Jonah (Figure 7) on the eastern wall is a special painting
depicting the popular Early Christian theme, the Jonah-cycle (see for example
the one in the Callistus catacomb, Figure 8). It is unique in that the Sopianae
painting shows the whole cycle in one. The cycle includes Jonah being thrown
to the sea, Jonah disgorged by a ketos (a sea monster) and Jonah resting. The
last part (Jonah’s resting) can be seen on the upper right hand corner of the
painting viewed from above, under a pergola. (Heidl 2005, 42-46). The
iconography of the fresco is an organic part of the burial chamber, as the main
point of this painting is the resurrection, just like on the barrel vault (depicting
Paradise) or on the St Peter and Paul fresco where the apostles point to the
symbol of the risen Christ. There is a direct link between the resurrection of
Jonah, disgorged by the ketos, after three days just like as Christ had risen on
the third day (Heidl 2005, 62-64). The painting also has its parallel in the St
Peter and Marcellinus catacomb in Rome on a contemporary painting (Kádár
1939, 20-21).
40
The acanthus tendrils (Figure 9) on the southern and northern wall of the burial
chamber are similar to the acanthus tendril motifs of the Theodorus mosaic in
the double basilica at Aquileia (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 50). Another place where
similar tendrils can be seen is in the Nis burial chambers; however, these also
could be traced to Aquileian origin (Fülep 1984, 39). The motif appeared for
the first time in Rome in the St John and Paul catacomb (circa 385 AD) and
from there, spread to northern Italy (Aquileia and Milan) and to the Balkans
and Sopianae (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 50-51).
On the barrel vault (Figure 10) four male portraits can be seen in medallions
around a Chi-Rho symbol. Plants, flowers and birds represent Paradise around
the portraits. Fülep (1984, 39) states that the same medallion portraits can be
found in Aquileia. There are some similarities with the medallions in Rome at
the Santa Constanza mausoleum and there are stylistic parallels with the
medallions in the Ciriaca catacomb in Rome (Kádár 1939, 14-15). The fin de
siècle portraiture applied, and the characteristics overall are typical of the late
fourth century (Hudák and Nagy 2005, 46-47). Different theories exist about
those who were depicted on the portraits. Fülep (1984, 42) suggests that it is
possibly depicting the quatuor sancti coronati, the four crowned martyrs, who
died in the nearby Lugio (Dunaszekcső, Hungary), because depicting four
males is quite unusual. In that case, the relics of the martyrs were transported
or robbed (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 6). Another possibility is that the portraits
depict four brothers and the burial chamber is a private burial place (Hudák and
Nagy 2005, 46).
41
The composition of the whole burial chamber, especially the Paradise scene on
the barrel vault with flowers, plants, doves and peacocks were spread from
Aquileia, however they can be found in the Balkans as well (as the influence of
Aquileia) (Fülep 1984, 39; Hudák and Nagy 2005, 44).
Figure 10. The barrel vault of the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber.
42
The Early Christian Mausoleum
The Early Christian Mausoleum (Figure 3/6 and Figure 11), so-called because
most of the funerary buildings are Early Christian mausolea in Sopianae, on
Szent István Square was built between AD 350 and 360, according to Fülep
(1977b, 254), but Pozsárkó (2005) dates it to the 370s or 380s. It is a local
characteristic that the burial chamber has hardly any connection with the
mausoleum above (as is the case with the Burial Chamber of the Jar, see
below). The building of the Early Christian Mausoleum has its parallel in the
mausoleum in Marusinac, near Salona (Dyggve 1951 cited in Hudák and Nagy
2005, 17) (Figure 12). This mausoleum has the same size and division as the
mausoleum in Sopianae (Fülep 1977b, 254). Furthermore, the building is also
similar to the martyrium in La Alberca, Spain (Testini 1980, cited in Hudák
and Nagy 2005, 17; also Fülep 1977b, 254; Fülep 1987, 36-38). The closest
parallel to the wall paintings of the Early Christian Mausoleum can be found in
the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber, just a few metres away (Fülep 1987, 36-
38; Hudák and Nagy 2005, 17).
The wall paintings of the Early Christian Mausoleum are the following: partly
vulgar decorations, marble imitation paintings, with Pompeii III style red
medallions, frescoes in a red frame (Pozsárkó 2005, 66). The frescoes on the
northern wall of the Early Christian Mausoleum depict the Fall of Adam and
Eve (Figure 13) and Daniel in the Lions’ Den (Figure 14). The same themes
could be found together in an Italian sarcophagus, now in the Lateran Museum
(Roppo 1969 cited in Fülep, 1977b, 255).
43
Figure 11. The Early Christian Mausoleum, the part that can be seen on the surface.
Figure 12. The mausoleum in Marusinac, near Salona.
44
Figure 13. The fresco of Adam and Eve on the northern wall of the burial chamber under the Early Christian Mausoleum of Sopianae.
Figure 14. Wall painting from the Early Christian Mausoleum of Sopianae depicting Daniel in the lions’ den.
45
The origin of the paintings of the mausoleum is the catacomb art in Rome,
where the theme of the Fall was very popular. A Daniel fresco and Noah’s Ark
(see above at the figure in a white dress) can be found in the Domitilla
catacomb, within the so-called region of the Flavii (Rutgers 2000, 162).
It is possible that wandering Italian painters worked in Sopianae from Italian
sample books. Two epigraphs of such painters have been found in Savaria,
northern Pannonia hence these artists were present in the province (Fülep
1977b, 255). In Aquae Iasae (Varaždinske Toplice, Croatia), southern
Pannonia a fragment of a fresco, depicting a saint found in the middle of the
main basilica is also likely to be a work of an Italian travelling artist from
Rome or Aquileia (Migotti 1997, 33).
However, it is worth mentioning that the closest parallel of the Early Christian
Mausoleum is the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber (Fülep 1977b). It is likely
that the latter burial chamber which was built at in the end of the fourth century
(Heidl, 2005) used the mausoleum paintings as a sample, or at least the artists
of the St Peter and Paul burial chambers knew the paintings of the mausoleum
and got inspiration from them.
Csaba Pozsárkó (2005, 66) dated the first phase of the building of the
mausoleum to the 370s, 380s. From the iconography, it is likely that a martyr
had been buried here, as he is depicted on the eastern wall of the burial
chamber (Figure 15). It is possible that either a martyr executed during the
persecutions of Diocletian was reburied here after a few decades, or a high-
rank Christian, who died in a Barbarian attack, during the end of the 370s
46
(Pozsárkó 2005, 68). The place of sarcophagus No. 1, at the right hand side of
Christ, who is depicted in a niche of the eastern wall of the burial chamber in
the form of a Chi-Rho symbol, suggest a Gnostic influence, where the body
and the soul were separated: on right hand side, the body in the sarcophagus;
on the left-hand side, the soul. This idea was foreign to the orthodox western
church, but the Manichean heresy, which came from Syria, believed in this
(Pozsárkó 2005, 68). Pozsárkó (2005, 70) suggests that the inhabitants of the
province did not make a difference between the different kinds of Christianity
in the fourth century, when the orthodox church still fought against the
Manicheans and the Aryans. However, it seems that by the end of the fourth
century, two decades later, when the St Peter and Paul Burial Chamber was
built, it was important for the builders to show their loyalty to Rome, against
the Aryans (Hudák and Nagy, 2005).
Figure 15. Enthroned figure in the Early Christian Mausoleum of Sopianae.
47
Nagyné Hudák (2003, 59) mentions the possibility that the painters who
decorated the Early Christian Mausoleum worked from Italian sample
collections; however, the old and new collections remained in use, which gives
us explanation for why the Adam and Eve fresco has a tetrarchian style while
the Daniel fresco shows the characteristics of the middle of the fourth century.
Nagyné Hudák (2003, 59) thinks that the sign of this Balkan influence is that
the burial chamber was decorated fully. I cannot accept this argument as in the
catacombs of Rome, it is widespread that the whole burial chamber is
decorated with wall paintings (for example Catacomb of Commodilla:
Cubiculum Leonis, Cubiculum of the Catacomb of Via Dino Compagni,
catacomb of Domitilla: cubiculum of the Pistores, Catacomb of Priscilla:
Cappella Graeca). Hence, it cannot be only a Balkan character. Furthermore,
the burial chambers in the Roman catacombs seem to be the closest parallel of
the Sopianae burial chambers.
It is unclear who is depicted by the figure in the white gown on the eastern wall
(see Figure 15). According to Fülep (2001, 8) the fresco depicts a martyr. He
thinks this because of the presence of palm leaves on the painting. Nagyné
Hudák (2003) adds that the painting possibly depicts the deceased who was
first buried in the burial chamber (and for whom sarcophagus No. 1 was built).
It is not unknown to build thrones to the dead, which played role in one of the
funerary rituals (for example: Stevenson 1978, 96) However Hudák and Nagy
(2005, 22-23) also mention the possibility that the fresco is depicting Noah in
the ark. In the latter case this illustration is linked with the traditional figure of
Noah in the Roman catacombs, as can be seen in the Thrason catacomb
(Stevenson 1978, 68), in the Peter and Marcellinus catacomb (Stevenson 1978,
48
76). In the traditional iconography, Noah looks like he is sitting in a box, as
this is the icon for the ark. The interpretation of Gáspár (2002, 80) that the
painting is a part of a Biblical scene, like Jesus’ meeting with the Samarian
woman, is unlikely. The symbol of Christ, the Chi-Rho symbol is already
painted on the wall, at the centre, and it is not likely that on the same wall there
is another Jesus illustration.
The Daniel fresco on the northern wall (Figure 14) depicts the popular Early
Christian topic: Daniel in the Lions’ Den. Daniel is the archetype of the
persecuted Christians who at last escape from eternal death (Kádár, 1959, 4).
This subject can be found many times in the catacombs of Rome (for example
in the Lucina catacomb), however the forming of Daniel in the Sopianae fresco
shows similarities with the figure of the Good Shepherd in the Good Shepherd
Grave in Thessalonica (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 36). Daniel wears a tunic instead
of the usual Persian dress, a typical western characteristic (Kádár 1939, 27-29).
The fresco of Adam and Eve on the northern Wall (Figure 13) was also a
popular theme in Early Christian art, and in the birthplace of it, the Roman
catacombs. The Sopianae painting is especially similar to the depiction of the
St Peter and Marcellinus catacomb (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 36). The hairstyle of
Eve is similar to the woman on the wall painting in the Cinque Sancti
cubiculum in the Callixtus catacomb (Nagyné Hudák 2003, 36). The depiction
of the snake follows the style of the middle of the fourth century AD (Nagyné
Hudák 2003, 36).
49
There are plenty of parallel examples to the paintings of the mausoleum. The
plant decoration on the northeast wall is similar to the graves Nr 4 and 8 in
Serdica. The figure in the white gown has its parallel in the Noah figures in the
catacombs and in Salonica, in the Good Shepherd grave. The red ribbons,
which are hung from, the Chi-Rho symbol on the northeast wall and the
position of Eve’s head and her hairdo is similar to the Eustorgius grave in
Salonica. The hair of the lions on the fresco of Daniel has its parallel in Arles.
Sarcophagus No. 1 is similar to the sarcophagi made in Virunum (Nagyné
Hudák 2003, 67).
The Burial Chamber of the Jar
The Burial Chamber of the ‘Jar’ (this is in apostrophes, because the fresco in
the niche actually depicts a jug not a jar) or Burial Chamber II is a rectangular
building measuring 4.37 x 3.11 m. There is a burial chamber under the
mausoleum. It was built along a north-south axis (Hudák and Nagy 2005, 26-
27). The walls of the mausoleum are preserved up until about 50 cm, but the
main importance of the building is the wall paintings of the burial chamber. It
contains decorative elements rather than frescoes, apart from the Glass and the
Jug in a niche of the northern wall (Figure 16).
50
There are two sections of paintings on the walls. The lower part is decorated in
rectangles painted to look like marble. As a part of this lower band, there is a
rectangular imitation marble slab under the niche. It was suggested that it was
left empty for the epitaph, but was never used (Fülep 1984, 45). Arrowheads
shaped yellow flowers with green leaves symbolize the Garden of Paradise
(Hudák and Nagy 2005, 30). On the upper part of the northern wall, there are a
representation of two vine tendrils with grape leaves and greyish-purple grapes.
On the southern wall, there are two large medallions on both sides of the
entrance, but the medallions are empty. Above the entrance, there is a pentagon
motif. To summarise, the decoration of the whole burial chamber is rather
simplistic and geometric. It was dated to the second half of the fourth century
or the beginning of the fifth.
Figure 16. Northern wall of the Burial Chamber with the Jar.
51
The vine tendril on the northern wall is closely connected with the Nis burial
chamber. Marble incrustation imitation with rich floral and vine tendril
decoration can be found in Grave 7 in the church of Santa Sofia in Serdica
(Fülep 1984, 45). The origin of this decoration is Egypt and Syria and it is
possible that the motif extended from there through the Balkans to the Rome,
Naples and Sicily catacombs. Sopianae could be affected along the way to Italy
(Fülep 1984, 45), but it is more likely that the motif came from the Roman
catacombs to here, as the appearance of the motif is earlier in Rome than in
Sopianae. The Salonica burial chamber has also has some panels with grid
patterns and with the imitation of marble incrustation similar to the Sopianae
paintings (Fülep 1984, 45) The trellis-motif decoration all around the lower
section of the paintings is similar to the decoration found in Serdica, Grave No.
7 (Fülep 1984, 45).
To summarize, the Burial Chamber with the Jar has similar influences to the
previously mentioned two funerary buildings in Sopianae, but among the three,
it was the least sophisticated and decorated in the most simple way.
Burial Chamber V
This burial chamber has been known since 1913, however it was only
excavated in 2000/2001 (Hudák and Nagy 2005, 52). The main importance is
its octagonal ground plan (Figure 17), which was popular in the fourth century,
but unique in Sopianae. Many of the octagonal buildings elsewhere were
baptisteries, as the one found in Milan (Figure 18). However, Hudák and Nagy
(2005, 52) note that no pool (piscine) was found in Sopianae, which would be
52
necessary for a baptistery. They suggest, it was rather a mausoleum, and can be
compared with the slightly earlier mausoleum of Galerius in Salonica.
A possible Greek inscription came to light during the 2000/2001 excavation. It
is visible on the inner wall of the edifice (Figure 19). The letters (ΕΡHΨ) have
not been interpreted yet, however the possibility that this is not just a
decoration on the wall is only about ten per cent, according to O. Gábor
(personal communication, 10 July, 2006).
53
Figure 17. Burial Chamber V, after excavation.
Figure 18. Fourth century octagonal baptistery at St Tecla, Milan.
54
Other Funerary Buildings
The so-called Cella Trichora (Figure 20), a funerary building with three apses
is also a popular type in Early Christian funerary architecture. One if its finest
example is the still standing cella trichora in Rome (Figure 21), but closer to
Sopianae a similar buildings were found in Aquincum, and Sirmium as well
(Gáspár 2002, 22-24; Hudák and Nagy 2005, 60-61). Burials from the second
part of the fourth century were found around the building. It is worth
mentioning the wall paintings of the Cella Trichora. They contain two layers:
the first layer is Late Roman, but the second is medieval, and has an Arabic
inscription. It is evidence that the building remained in use throughout the
Middle Ages.
Figure 19. A possible Greek inscription on the inner wall of Burial Chamber V.
55
Figure 20. The reconstruction of the Cella Trichora in Sopianae.
Figure 21 The cella trichora near the catacomb of Callistus, after restoration.
56
Figure 22. The reconstruction of the Cella Septichora in Sopianae.
Figure 23. Reconstruction of the mosaic pavement of Burial Chamber X.
57
The Cella Septichora is a unique building (Figure 22). No building with the
same ground plan has been unearthed in the Roman Empire. The function of
this building is still not clear. Ferenc Fülep (1984) suggests that the building
was a funerary basilica, where the Eucharist was celebrated. To oppose this one
of the leading archaeologists of the new 2005/2006 excavation thinks that it
was not a basilica in an architectural sense because no altar has been found
(Pozsárkó, 2006). We are still awaiting for the publication of the new
excavation. The closest parallel for the Sopianae building is the St Gereon in
Cologne (Gerkon 1952 cited in Fülep 1984, 58).
The Cella Septichora also had wall paintings. Several hundreds of fragments of
wall paintings were found during the 1922 excavations (Fülep 1984, 58; Hudák
and Nagy 2005, 54). On the basis of that, a curtain pattern with grey stripes in
several colours could be reconstructed, which is similar to the wall paintings in
the Cella Trichora and to the wall paintings in the St Gereon in Cologne (Fülep
1984, 58).
Another important funerary building is Burial Chamber X. On the site of burial
chamber X, fragments of a mosaic floor were found (recently, it became
questionable if the mosaic was found there, or somewhere else in the cemetery)
with interwoven loop patterns of oval shapes (Figure 23). The motif was
popular in the fourth century (Fülep 1984, 61-63). It is black and yellow. A
similar, granular technique was used also on the contemporary pavement of the
basilica of Salona, in a burial chamber in Diocletianopolis and as far as the
temple of Sharei Zion in Israel, which shows that the technique was not used
only by Christians (Fülep 1984, 60). Fülep (1984, 60) suggests that the mosaic
58
floor was made according to eastern (probably Antiochian or North African)
pattern books. However, Nagyné Hudák (2003, 68) points out that the mosaic
floor is similar to a mosaic found in Aquileia. Hence, it is possible that the
originally oriental pattern arrived to Sopianae from the west.
Burial Chamber XIII, or in its later phase, Chapel XIII gained its importance
from the fact that benches for the clergy were found there. Hence, this is direct
proof for the existence of the clergy in Roman Sopianae, the evidence for the
transformation of the burial chamber to a chapel. Among the stone benches is a
big stone slab thought to be an altar stone (Fülep 1984, 280). Recently Hudák
and Nagy (2005, 16) questioned if this stone slab served as an altar or a table
for funerary banquets. However, their argument does deal with the existence of
the benches for the clergy.
59
Graves
Many different type of graves were found in the Early Christian cemetery
(Figure 24). Most of them had some kind of roof, and many of them were
walled. All graves were subterranean. The simplest graves were earthen. For
built graves, the main building material was brick and they were usually
plastered. The types of graves found in Sopianae were not unique in Pannonia.
For example, a grave vault similar to type d, was found in the nearby Certissa
(Štrbinici, Croatia). The structure of the graves in Manastirnice, next to Salona
(Solin, Croatia) has a similar structure to the Sopianae graves (Migotti 1997,
37-38).
A rare feature is the children’s cemetery west of Burial Chamber XIII. The
cemetery contained sixty-five children’s skeletons all together including
newborn babies, infants and teenagers. This cemetery is similar to the
children’s cemetery in Kleinziegenfeld (Germany) (Graves 72-77) from the
fifth century AD (Fülep 1984, 176)
The finest example for Sopianae graves is a double tomb constructed of stone
and brick. The inner walls of the tomb were plastered and decorated with Chi-
Rho monograms and red and yellow flowers (Figure 25). This kind of
decoration may often be seen in the painted funerary chambers of the Balkans
and the catacombs of Rome.
60
Figure 24. The different types of graves in the Early Christian Cemetery of Sopianae: a. earth grave with pitched roof b.- d. walled graves pitched roof e. walled grave with plain roof f.- g. walled graves with vault h. walled graves with double bottom.
62
CHAPTER 4
ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE (FINDS)
On a general level, one can compare the type of grave goods found in Sopianae
with the grave goods found in the catacombs of Rome. The typical finds from
the Roman catacombs from the fourth century are medallions, glass vessels and
coins in the loculi (Curl 1995, 66-67), which can be compared with the grave
goods from Sopianae graves (not the mausolea), where we can find similar
types of grave goods. One of the best-published areas of the Early Christian
Cemetery is the cluster around Burial Chamber XIII, excavated between 1968
and 1972 by Ferenc Fülep. From the 110 graves excavated here, 110 glass
vessels came to light including jars, vases, beakers and perfume bottles. Other
finds were rings, earrings, bracelets and fourth-century coins, showing striking
similarity with the Roman catacombs (Hudák and Nagy 2005, 15-16, Fülep
1984). However a more detailed investigation shows other influences on the
level of finds (mostly grave goods), as well.
Articles with Inscriptions
From the first three centuries AD, a considerable number of Latin inscriptions
have been found in Sopianae (for more information see: Fülep and Sz. Burger
1974). However, from the fourth century, only two Greek inscriptions have
been published. Both are instrumenta inscriptions (written on the surface of an
63
artefact) and one more probable inscription on a wall was discovered recently
(see before at Burial Chamber V). There were no Latin inscriptions found. This
ratio is unfortunate, however not surprising as, for example, in Carnuntum out
of the 650 inscriptions found, only three were from the fourth century (Lenski
2002, 41).
The best-known inscription has been found on a pie zeses type glass beaker
(Figure 26) dated to the end of the fourth century AD or first half of the fifth
century, now in the Hungarian National Museum (Kovács 2001, 35). The
inscription is the following: Пιε, ζήσαις καλώς αεί (Drink, and you shall live
long). This inscription can be found on Christian sepulchral inscriptions and in
the catacombs in Rome, as well. However only a small number of the
inscriptions were made by Christians, and although the text is in Greek, the
inscription spread throughout the whole Empire (Kovács 2001, 64-65). In fact,
this vessel arrived from Cologne to Sopianae (Fülep 1984).
Another instrumenta inscription can be found on a glass cameo dated to the
third or fourth century AD (Kovács 2001, 35) with the following (yet)
uninterpreted Greek letters: ΥΓIE[IA] [---] Χ [---] around a female head
portrait (Figure 27). The portrait depicts an eastern type hair style. This cameo
is likely to be from the Greek east, and is evidence for the oriental connections
of third to fourth century Sopianae.
64
Figure 26. Glass beaker with a Greek inscription found in Sopianae.
Figure 27. Glass cameo from the Early Christian cemetery of Sopianae with a Greek inscription around a female head.
65
Coins
The analysis of coins from Sopianae and its vicinity gives us a picture of the
commercial connections of the city. Among the coins minted in the fourth
century, found in the Roman city of Sopianae and in the surrounding
cemeteries, most of them were minted in Siscia, which is not surprising as
Siscia was the closest mint (Fülep 1984, 220-230). However, coins were found
which were minted in Lyon, Rome, Aquileia, Nicomedia (Izmit, Turkey) and
Constantinople. The most significant financial flow was under Constantius II
(AD 337-361) (Fülep 1984, 220-230). This data shows the commercial
connections of the city with the west (Gaul and Italy) and to the east
(Constantinople, Nicomedia), as well.
Sculpture
A statue of Valentinian II (AD 375-393) was probably found in Pécs (Figure
28). The place of finding is not certain, as scholars cannot agree if it was found
in Pécs or in Croatia. The figurine was the product of a western workshop,
imitating the Byzantine style (Fülep 1984, 205). It is proof for the existence of
the emperor cult in Christian times (however, it is not absolutely certain if it
was used for ritual purposes). An important message of the statue is that if an
article has an oriental style it could still be a product of a western workshop.
Hence, one has to be cautious before forming an argument about oriental
influence, on the basis of an oriental-style artefact.
66
Figure 28. Gilded bronze statue of emperor Valentinian II.
Figure 29. Sarcophagus Nr 1 in the Early Christian Mausoleum of Sopianae.
67
From the fourth century, the sarcophagi are the most important sculptural
evidence. In the Early Christian Mausoleum, three sarcophagi were found, but
two of them (No. 2 and 3) preserved only as a base. Sarcophagus No. 1, a
‘column sarcophagus’ (Kádár 1959, 40-46) (Figure 29) broken by an axe
during the Migration period has been restored. The analysis of this sarcophagus
shows that its material came from Noricum, from the valley of the river Drave,
possibly from one of the great stonemason workshops at Virunum (Austria)
(Fülep 1977a, 255). However, if the material came from Noricum, it does not
necessarily mean that the actual sarcophagus was made in there (Nagy 1988,
223). It could be the product of a local workshop.
In the absence of fourth-century epigraphy, we cannot tell much about the
other epigraphic sculpture. However, on earlier gravestones both the oriental
vine-amber tendril and the Aquileian dolphin motif were popular, sometimes in
the same gravestone. A local feature, the tendril decoration found on
gravestones from the earlier centuries and the motif were still popular on
fourth-century wall paintings in the mausolea as well (Fülep and Sz. Burger,
1974, 10-11).
Glass objects
Among glass finds, it is worth mentioning a glass bowl from Cologne, oriental
beakers and conical beakers from the Red Sea, and a glass amphora, which is
thought to be a Syrian import (Fülep 1984, 197-98). Overall, regarding the
glass finds from the fourth century, Fülep (1984, 197-98) states that the amount
68
of glass import was the same from the western (mostly Gaul and Rhineland)
and the eastern provinces.
From the children’s cemetery west of the Burial Chamber XIII, many glass
vessels, mostly jug and beaker sets or glass perfume bottles have been
discovered (Hudák-Nagy 2005, 16). These glass vessels could be associated
with a local production centre, as the types of grave goods were affected by
availability (Jones 1987, 829; Fülep 1984, 153) and it seems from the
archaeological record, that glass was available in huge quantities in fourth-
century Sopianae. During the time which I spent in excavation on the site we
found big pieces of melted Roman glass, as well.
A special find from the children’s cemetery is a glass cameo, depicting the
Good Shepherd from the grave G/17 (Figure 30). The origin of this kind of
representation is a frequently occurring motif in Early Christian art in Rome of
Pagan origin, the ram bearer (kriophoros). The Pagan motif was popular from
as early as the seventh century BC. From the third century AD, Christians
accepted the figure, as a reference for the Good Shepherd (Figure 31), a
popular title for Jesus (see John 10:11-18). It was depicted in every form of art
and craftsmanship, from wall painting to glass cameos (Rutgers 2000, 89-90).
The cameo, found in Sopianae shows that the fashion reached Sopianae, as
well. It is interesting that the toga of the Good Shepherd on the Sopianae
cameo is curled up on both sides, which was never depicted in western
provinces, but was popular on the eastern type representations. Gáspár (2002)
argues that the cameo depicts Diana, however this explanation is not likely
(Hudák and Nagy 2005, 15)
69
Metal objects
Regarding metal objects, bronze vessels were found which were made in the
Rhineland, a bronze lamp made in Italy, and brooches from Illyricum (Fülep
1984, 202). Bronze bracelets were found, which are similar to bracelets found
in Rhaetia, and a belt set (Nr 28) from grave R/212 which can be linked with a
military belt found at Augst (Switzerland) (Fülep 1984, 204). Bronze
headdresses were found in children’s graves. This fashion spread from the
Rhineland (Fülep 1984, 204). A typical Christian find is a suspension from a
lamp, found in the Burial Chamber V in 2000. It contains the Greek letters
alpha and omega in a Chi-Rho symbol (Figure 32) (this is the official symbol
of the Early Christian Cemetery of Sopianae).
Figure 30. Glass cameo from Grave G/17.
Figure 31. Statue of a kriophoros from the catacombs of Rome.
70
In addition, from the fourth century, a wooden casket with bronze plates has
been found (Figure 33). The plates depict mythological scenes and the
personification of four cities (Siscia, Constantinople, Rome and Sirmium). It
could be a product of Sirmium or Siscia, but it is also possible that it was
produced in Trier (Fülep 1984, 216-18). However, the site of the finding is
questionable. According to Hungarian scholarship, the casket was found in a
sarcophagus in Pécs, as published by Flóris Rómmer (1876, cited in Nagy
1988, 228). But according Miklós Jankovich (1839, cited in Nagy 1988, 228) it
was found in Croatia and international scholars accept this publication for the
origin of the casket (Nagy 1988, 228).
Figure 32. Bronze lamp suspension found in Burial Chamber V.
71
Textiles
In a female grave, a textile fragment was found from the third or fourth century
AD. This fragment is interwoven with golden thread. This is similar to an
example found in Cologne (Fülep 1984, 218). Unfortunately, we do not have
more textile findings from Roman times, due the nature of the low rate of
preservation of this material.
73
CONCLUSION
Politically, Sopianae and its wider environment, Pannonia, belonged to the
west. This is proven by the facts that when Diocletian founded the tetrarchy,
the province became a territory of the western augustus and when a hundred
years later, Theodosius finally divided the empire into two states, the city
became a part of the Western Roman Empire. We have enough evidence for
the strong western influence in Sopianae in the fourth century in the terms of
the influence of the Roman catacombs, the Aquileian Christianity, and trade
from Gaul and the Danube provinces to support this argument on the level of
archaeology, as well. The discussion of the archaeological remains shows
strong influence by the Roman catacombs, but also North Italian samples were
applied. Rich finds from Gaul and the Danube provinces show living
connections with these areas, as well.
Socially, in the first and second centuries AD, the most considerable immigrant
group was the Italian (Fülep and Sz. Burger 1974), which was gradually
replaced with other people from the western provinces. However, oriental
immigration started as early as the second century AD and became stronger
throughout the time (Morton 1996, 58). By the fourth century, the oriental
influence was considerable in the area, but objects spread from the west are
still the majority within the archaeological record.
Furthermore, it seems that the Balkans was a relatively united region, at least
on a cultural level, and Sopianae was the northernmost city of this region. After
Italy and Rome lost its leading position within the empire in the fourth century,
74
the provinces became more important, and the emphasis on the area around the
Balkans, with Sirmium in the centre, was stressed considerably. Several
emperors came from that area, and Sirmium was the place where emperors
usually divided the empire between themselves (Lenski 2002, 26). In the
person of Constans (AD 337-350), this central part of the empire had an
independent ruler, who reigned in the Balkans, Italy and Africa (Sarris 2002,
26). The effect of the Greek-speaking eastern and Balkan culture was strong in
fourth-century Sopianae, as it can be traced through art historical evidence
(Nagyné Hudák 2003, 65-66). On the other hand, the influence of
Constantinople that gradually oppressed everything in the area was only partial
in the fourth century (Gábor 2003, 62).
In the archaeological record this political, cultural and social situation is well
preserved. There might be similar results from other cities in southern
Pannonia; however, the lack of data does not make it possible to examine these
cities at the present (Migotti 1997, 5-6). The small amount of data and
scholarship that is available about these southern Pannonian cities supports my
results about the influences of the region. Other evidence from the well-
researched northern Pannonia shows a slightly different picture, with obvious
strong connections with the west and the east, but less with the Mediterranean.
My study also proved that the term ‘southern Pannonia’ could apply not only to
the region south from the Drave, but spread over the river, at least to the sub-
Mediterranean city of Sopianae. The division according to modern countries
(southern Pannonia = northern Croatia and Serbia; northern Pannonia =
Hungary and western Austria) is not correct in the terms of the fourth century.
75
Even the fourth-century administrative border, which was the river Drave, did
not mean a cultural or social division, as the river (which was partly shippable
in antiquity and has an important crossing point at Mursa, close to Sopianae)
was rather a link than a divider between the areas of its north and south side.
Of course I did not use all of the evidence available, but I used typical
examples from every group of archaeological evidence. I dealt with the finest
and well preserved examples in more detail, due the nature of the objects.
However, I think the results from that database can represent the whole group
of evidence from the site. What need to be done, though is a complete study
about funerary practices of the Balkan. The results of this study can establish
the presence of a culturally flourishing region between east and west on the
Balkans and its wider environment. As this region lay partly in the western and
partly in the eastern empire, the results should be striking and can show a
mixed culture. However, a further research could also help us to see a more
real picture about the Late Roman Empire, when east and west were not
sharply divided, and smaller regions sometimes were more important than the
great division of the empire and its people to eastern and western.
The region of southern Pannonia had a booming economy, even as late as the
second part of the fourth century. The closeness of Milan, Ravenna and
Constantinople and the well developed Christianity show that this region was
at least as developed in the fourth century as, for example, Gaul or Spain.
Although the areas next to the limes experienced a sharp decline as the result of
stronger Barbarian attacks, the hinterland developed. New public buildings
were built and Christianity had a strong base in Pannonia, both the Aryan and
76
the orthodox camp. The war between the two ideologies finished with the
victory of the orthodoxy. However, groups with Aryan theories, such as the
Bogumils, existed in the region as late as the eleventh century (Gáspár 2002).
The result of this different development is which caused major differences in
terms of society and Christianity between the Central European region and the
other western provinces, like Gaul, Spain. These differences originate in the
Migration period. From the fifth century onwards, the migrating Barbarian
peoples made developing a stable medieval state in the area difficult. Medieval
states were only established in the ninth century, with the establishment of the
Avar Empire. Christianity was only revived in the tenth century, with the
conversion of the Croats and in the eleventh with the conversion of the
Hungarians, which peoples settled in the region after the collapse of the Avar
Empire.
77
BIBLIOGRAPHY Alföldy, G. 2000. Római társadalomtörténet. (The history of the Roman
society) Budapest: Osiris Bertók, L., Csorba Gy., Heidl Gy., Jankovits L., Ladányi-Turóczi Cs., Csehy
Z., Márton L., Méhes K., Tóth E., Kárpáti G., Bachman Z., Bachmann B., Lengvári I., Visy Zs., Ujvári J., Ágoston Z., Somos R., Rugási Gy. Katus L., 2003. A Pécsi világörökség (The World Heritage of Pécs). Pécs: Sopianae Örökség
Curl, J. 1993. A Celebration of death. An introduction to some of the buildings,
monuments, and settings of funerary architecture in the western European tradition. London: BT Batsford
Dyggve, E. 1935. Das Mausoleum in Pécs. Pécs: published by the author Effros, B. 2003. Merovingian Mortuary Archaeology and the Making of the
Early Middle Ages. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Fülep, F. 1964. Pécs Rómaikori Emlékei (The Roman monuments of Pécs).
Budapest: Képzőművészeti Alap Fülep, F. 1977a. Roman Cemeteries on the Territory of Pécs (Sopianae).
Budapest: Akadémiai Fülep, F. 1977b. A Pécsi Ókeresztény Mauzóleum Ásatása (Excavations of the
Early Christian Mausoleum of Pécs). In: Archeológiai Értesítő 104: 246-257
Fülep, F. 1984. Sopianae: The History of Pécs During the Roman Era, and the
problem of the continuity of the Late Roman Population. Budapest: Akadémiai
Fülep, F. 1987. A pécsi későrómai-ókeresztény mauzóleum feltárásáról (The
excavation of the Late Roman – Old Christian mausoleum in Pécs). In: A Janus Pannonius Múzeum Évkönyve 32: 31-44
Fülep, F. 2001. Sopianae késő római és ókeresztény múltja (Sopianae’s Late
Roman and Early Christian past). In: Éri, I. (ed) Pécs: ókeresztény mauzóleum és a „korsós” sírkamra. Budapest: TKM Egyesület, 1-9
Fülep, F. and Sz. Burger, A. 1974. Pécs római kori kőemlékei (Die
Römerzeitlichen Steindenkmäler von Pécs). Pécs: Pécs Megyei Város Tanácsa
Gábor, O. 2003. A Ciszterci Rend Pécsi Nagy Lajos Gimnáziuma udvarán
talált temetőrészlet. (The cemetery cluster found on the courtyard of the ‘Nagy Lajos’ Grammar School of the Cistercian Order in Pécs) In: Antal, E., Dr. Csekőné Kádas, K. and Kalász Gy. (eds) A Ciszterci
78
Rend Pécsi Nagy Lajos Gimnáziumának Jubileumi Évkönyve. Pécs: A Ciszterci Rend Pécsi Nagy Lajos Gimnáziuma, 59-72
Gábor, O. 2005. A közelmúlt feltárásai (Recent Excavations). Available at
www.septichora.hu/en/elozmenyek_kozelmult.php [Accessed at 14/09/2006]
Gáspár, D. 2002. Christianity in Roman Pannonia: An evaluation of Early
Christian Finds and sites from Hungary. BAR Int. Ser. 1010 Harris, A. 2003. Byzantium Britain & the West. The Archaeology of Cultural
Identity AD 400-650. Stroud: Tempus Harries, J. 1987. The Rise of Christianity. In: Wacher, J. (ed) The Roman
World. London: Routledge, 796-811 Heidl, Gy. 2005. A pécsi I. sz. sírkamra Jónás-képe és Szent Jeromos Jónás-
kommentárja (The Jonah fresco of the Burial Chamber I in Pécs and The Jonah commentary of St Jerome). In: Katekhón 2005/1: 42-68
Hudák, K. and Nagy, L. 2005. A Fine and Private Place. Discovering the Early
Christian Cemetery of Sopianæ/Pécs. Pécs: Sopianae Örökség Jones, R. 1987. Burial Customs of Rome and the Provinces. In: Wacher, J. (ed)
The Roman World. London: Routledge, 812-837 Kádár, Z. 1939. Pannonia ókeresztény emlékeinek ikonográfiája. (The
iconography of the Early Christian remains of Pannonia) Budapest: Stephaneum
Kádár, Z. 1941. A Triumphus-eszme a pécsi ókeresztény héroon egyik
freskóján. (The idea of the Triumphus on a fresco of the Early Christian hereon in Pécs) In: Regnum 1941-42: 65-69
Kádár, Z. 1959. Ókeresztény és Kora Bizánci Művészet (Early Christian and
Early Byzantine Art). Budapest: Gondolat Katona Győr, Zs. 2000. Az első keresztények a Dél-Dunántúlon az ókeresztény
temetők tükrében – Sopianae (The First Chrsitians in Southern Transdanubia as Mirrored in the Early Chrsitian Cemeteries – Sopianae) In: Huszár, Z. (ed) Kereszténység és államiság Baranyában (Christianity and Statehood in Baranya County). Pécs: Baranya Megyei Múzeumok Igazgatósága, 23-39
Kárpáti, G. 2003. Contra damnationem memoriae (Az emlékezet kitörlése
ellen). In: Bertók, L. et al, 2003. A Pécsi világörökség. 35-40. Pécs: Sopianae Örökség
Kovács, P. (ed) 2001. Corpus Inscriptiorum Graecarum Pannonicarum.
Debrecen: University of Debrecen
79
Lengvári, A. 2003. Sopianae kutatásának története (The research history of Sopianae). In: Bertók, L. et al. A Pécsi világörökség. Pécs: Sopianae Örökség, 59-68
Lenski, N. 2002. Failure of Empire. Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth
Century A.D. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Mango, C. (ed) 2002. The Oxford History of Byzantium. Oxford: University
Press Mango, M. 2006. Action in the Trenches: A Call for a More Dynamic
Archaeology of Early Byzantium. Available at http://www.byzantinecongress.org.uk/plenary/II/II_Mango.pdf. [Accessed at 14/09/2006]
Marcellinus, A. 1986. The Later Roman Empire (A.D. 354-378). Hamilton, W.
(transl). Harmondsworth: Penguin Migotti, B. 1997. Evidence for Christianity in Roman Southern Pannonia
(Northern Croatia). A catalogue of finds and sites. BAR Int. Ser. 684 Mócsy, A. 1974. Pannonia a késői császárkorban (Pannonia in the late
imperial times). Budapest: Akadémiai Nagy, T. 1988. Sopiane: Egy új városmonográfia margójára (Sopianae: Notes
for a new city monography). In: Antik Tanulmányok 33: 218-245 Morton, A. R. 1996. The Historical Development of Roman Religion in
Pannonia from 9 AD to 285. PhD thesis, Department of Philosophy, University of Wales, Lampeter
Nagyné Hudák, K. 2003. Bibliai témák és szentábrázolások a sirmiumi
metropolia ókeresztény művészetében (Biblical themes and representations of saints in the art of the Early Christian metropolia of Sirmium). Masters dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest
Nicolai, V. F., Bisconti, F. and Mazzoleni, D. 1999. The christian catacombs of
Rome: history, decoration, inscriptions. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner Pearson, M. 2005. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Stroud: Sutton Pozsárkó, Cs. 2005. A sopianaei ókeresztény „Mauzóleum” szimbólumai (The
symbols of the Early Christian ‘Mausoleum’ of Sopianae. Ókor 2005/4: 65-70
Pozsárkó, Cs. (gaeius@pozsarko.hu), 14 March 2006. RE: septichora. E-mail
to Z.R. Magyar (prq05zrm@shef.ac.uk) Rolfe, J. C. (ed) 1939. Ammianus Marcellinus: Res Gestae. London:
Heinemann
80
Rutgers, L. V. 2000. Subterranean Rome. Leuven: Peeters Sarris, P. 2002. The Eastern Roman Empire from Constantine to Heraclius
(306-641). In: Mango, C. (ed) 2002. The Oxford History of Byzantium. Oxford: University Press, 19-59
Stevenson, J. 1978. The Catacombs. Rediscovered monuments of early
Christianity. London: Thames and Hudson Tóth, E. 1991. Pannonia Christiana. A kereszténység kezedetei a Kárpát-
medencében (The beginnings of Christianity in the Carpathian Basin). In: Életünk 1991/8: 740-747.
Tóth, E. 2003. A pécsi ókeresztény sírépületek eredete és jelképei (The origin
and the symbols of the Early Christian buildings of Pécs) In: Bertók et al. A Pécsi világörökség. Pécs: Sopianae Örökség, 110-116
Visy, Zs. 2003a. The ripa Pannonica in Hungary. Budapest: Akadémiai Visy Zs. 2003b. Adatok Sopianae ókeresztény leletegyüttesének értékeléséhez
(Details for the evaluation of the Early Christian findings of Sopianae). In: Bertók, L. et al. A Pécsi világörökség (The World Heritage of Pécs). Pécs: Sopianae Örökség