Post on 07-Jan-2023
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR FOREST OPERATIONS USING TWO
DIFFERENT METHODS
Anastasia Stergiadou, Mariusz Bembenek, Zbigniew Karaszewski, Piotr S. Mederski
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
FOREST OPERATION & EVALUATION USING THE 3E METHOD
• E rgonomic • E cological • E conomic
• stand • shrub layer , • soil • emissions
- noise - toxic - CO 2
• elements withdrowal
Work load: • phisical • mental • environmental
-vibrations -noise -exhoust gases -light
Threats: • health • life
• productivity • costs:
- fixed - variable =(total) -(micro)organisms
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
Questioner for contacting EIA
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
cena zakupu (12. 12. 2007) - purchase price (in 12. 12. 2007) (zł) 999476,85
liczba motogodzin (5 lat) – number of working hours (5 years) (mth) 6500
koszty, kategorie - costs, categoriesmiesięcznie -monthly
na mth - per hour T02
(zł) amortyzacja (z łącznej raty miesięcznej, kapitał i odsetki) - amortisation (from monthly instalment, capital and interest) 19926,57 147,20ubezpieczenie - insurance 620,00 5,73przechowywania/garażowanie - garage costs 350,00 3,23paliwo - fuel 60,00oleje, smary - oil, lubricant 3000,00 27,70części zamianne, naprawy - spare parts, maintenance 1700,00 15,70
płace operatora (z wszystkimi pochodnymi, w tym ZUS) - operator costs (with overheads) 4000,00 36,94przejazdy transportowe - transport costs 2500,00 23,09koszty całkowite - total costs 319,58
W T02 K T02
koszty jednostkowe - unit costs (m3 h-1) (zł m-3)brz+so III kl. wieku - b+p 3rd age class 19,78 16,16brz III kl. wieku - b 3rd age class 26,95 11,86so III kl. wieku - p 3rd age class 18,68 17,11brz+so IV kl. wieku - b+p 4th age class 32,38 9,87brz IV kl. wieku - b 4th age class 40,46 7,90so IV kl. wieku - p 4th age class 28,62 11,17
W T08 K T08
koszty jednostkowe - unit costs (m3 h-1) (zł m-3)brz+so III kl. wieku - b+p 3rd age class 13,28 24,07brz III kl. wieku - b 3rd age class 18,09 17,67so III kl. wieku - p 3rd age class 12,54 25,49brz+so IV kl. wieku - b+p 4th age class 21,74 14,70brz IV kl. wieku - b 4th age class 27,16 11,77so IV kl. wieku - p 4th age class 19,21 16,64
Ecological impacts on stands and trees
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
Ecological Impacts on soil
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
Emissions on soil
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
NOISE MEASURMENTS
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
ELEMENTS WITH DROWAL
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
C0 2 EMISSIONS
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
ERGONOMICAL IMPACTS
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
MENTAL WORKINGENVIRONMENT
PHYSICAL
FOREST WORKER
ERGONIMIC IMPACTS ON THE FOREST WORKER
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
ECONOMIC IMPACTS
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
ECONOMICAL ISSUES
PRODUCTIVITY
VALUE OF PRODUCTS
TOTAL COST (FOREST OPERATIONS & MARKET PRICES)
FOREST OPERATION & EVALUATION USING ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF PROJECTS
AND ACTVITIES METHOD
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
LAW 4014/2011
QUESTIONERS TO WORKERS, HABITTANTS, INDUSTIRIES
LANDSCAPE QUALITY
TOPOGRAPHICAL, CLIMATOLOGICAL,SOIL, CULTURAL
ASPECTS
PUBLIC QUESTIONER
Aristotle
Univer
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
A PUBLIC CONVERSATION TRUE
•THE MUNISIPALITY,
•THE PERFECTURE OR
•THE MINISTERY WEBPAGE
GIVES THE OPORTUNITY TO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE LIVING NEAR BY THE AREA WHERE FOREST OPERATIONS ARE GOING TO TAKE PLASE TO GIVE THEIR ASPECTS ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF THE PROBLEMS THAT MIGHT SHOW UP FROM THAT KIND OF PROJECT
LANDSCAPE QUALITY Specialists on EIA are contacting an evaluation
of the remaining situation before a Forest Operation Project take place
They collect climatologic, soil, sound, emission data
They make a map of the area with the nearest settlements, cultural or historical places, roadnet, railnet, ports, airports
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
Map of the Forest Operation Project
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
QUANTITY MEASUREMENTS
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
DESTINATIONS BETWEEN THE STAND WHERE THE FOREST OPERATIONS ARE GOING TO TAKE PLACE
AND THE NEAREST CITIES
EIA CRITERIA FOR ABSORPION
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
COMPATABILITY BETWEEN FOREST OPERATIONS & NATURE
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
The Mean Intensity was measured equal to each research, so by using the equation of compatability we get: C1 = MA1 X ME1 => C1 = 66,12 %
C2 = MA2 X ME2 => C2 = 70,806 %
C3 = MA3 X ME3 => C3 = 66,29%
ABSORPIONS RESULTS
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
WE VALUE: The average values for the optical absorption capacity of each selected area
WE TAKE IN CONSIDERATION THE: the slope terrain
WE ACCEPT AS BEST VALUE: The compatability value of each area MUST be over 60% and that makes our proposed development acceptable.
EIA’S PLANNING BASES ON
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
SEPARATION OF THE WORK IN STAGES: a) Field Work b) recording and processing of selected data
points c) designing of the proposed projects and d) presentation of final proposals to study the
sustainable development of the region e) run an EIA revaluation for the proposed
forest operations
FOREST OPERATIONS IN GREECE
Aristotle
University
of
Aristotle
U
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
CONCLUTIONS3E METHOD IS BASED ON: ECOLOGICAL ERGONOMICAL ECONOMICAL ASPECTS
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF PROJECTS AND ACTVITIES METHOD BASED ON:
PUBLIC QUESTIONERS QUALITY ASPECTS OF LANDSCAPE QUANTITY ASPECTS OF NATURE & WORKERS
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
ADVANTAGES & DISSADVANTAGESBOTH METHODS ARE BASED : ON HUMAN OPINION SOIL AND EMISSIONS ARE EVALUATED
THOROWLY THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE PROJECT
So both of them are conserning workers and inhabbitants as well as nature, in order to make a proper evaluation of the impacts that forest operations have.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment
EIA’s disadvandages
Anfortunately to contact an EIA for every FO project is taking a long time, it costs and specialized personal is needed. Usually the enterprises don’t want to be
serious involved because of a high cost of that kind of evaluation.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment