ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR FOREST OPERATIONS USING TWO DIFFERENT METHODS_FORMEC-2013

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR FOREST OPERATIONS USING TWO

DIFFERENT METHODS

Anastasia Stergiadou, Mariusz Bembenek, Zbigniew Karaszewski, Piotr S. Mederski

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Environment

FOREST OPERATION & EVALUATION USING THE 3E METHOD

• E rgonomic • E cological • E conomic

• stand • shrub layer , • soil • emissions

- noise - toxic - CO 2

• elements withdrowal

Work load: • phisical • mental • environmental

-vibrations -noise -exhoust gases -light

Threats: • health • life

• productivity • costs:

- fixed - variable =(total) -(micro)organisms



Questioner for contacting EIA



cena zakupu (12. 12. 2007) - purchase price (in 12. 12. 2007) (zł) 999476,85

liczba motogodzin (5 lat) – number of working hours (5 years) (mth) 6500

koszty, kategorie - costs, categoriesmiesięcznie -monthly

na mth - per hour T02

(zł) amortyzacja (z łącznej raty miesięcznej, kapitał i odsetki) - amortisation (from monthly instalment, capital and interest) 19926,57 147,20ubezpieczenie - insurance 620,00 5,73przechowywania/garażowanie - garage costs 350,00 3,23paliwo - fuel 60,00oleje, smary - oil, lubricant 3000,00 27,70części zamianne, naprawy - spare parts, maintenance 1700,00 15,70

płace operatora (z wszystkimi pochodnymi, w tym ZUS) - operator costs (with overheads) 4000,00 36,94przejazdy transportowe - transport costs 2500,00 23,09koszty całkowite - total costs 319,58

W T02 K T02

koszty jednostkowe - unit costs (m3 h-1) (zł m-3)brz+so III kl. wieku - b+p 3rd age class 19,78 16,16brz III kl. wieku - b 3rd age class 26,95 11,86so III kl. wieku - p 3rd age class 18,68 17,11brz+so IV kl. wieku - b+p 4th age class 32,38 9,87brz IV kl. wieku - b 4th age class 40,46 7,90so IV kl. wieku - p 4th age class 28,62 11,17

W T08 K T08

koszty jednostkowe - unit costs (m3 h-1) (zł m-3)brz+so III kl. wieku - b+p 3rd age class 13,28 24,07brz III kl. wieku - b 3rd age class 18,09 17,67so III kl. wieku - p 3rd age class 12,54 25,49brz+so IV kl. wieku - b+p 4th age class 21,74 14,70brz IV kl. wieku - b 4th age class 27,16 11,77so IV kl. wieku - p 4th age class 19,21 16,64

Ecological impacts on stands and trees



Ecological Impacts on soil



Emissions on soil



NOISE MEASURMENTS



ELEMENTS WITH DROWAL



C0 2 EMISSIONS



ERGONOMICAL IMPACTS



MENTAL WORKINGENVIRONMENT

PHYSICAL

FOREST WORKER

ERGONIMIC IMPACTS ON THE FOREST WORKER



ECONOMIC IMPACTS



ECONOMICAL ISSUES

PRODUCTIVITY

VALUE OF PRODUCTS

TOTAL COST (FOREST OPERATIONS & MARKET PRICES)

FOREST OPERATION & EVALUATION USING ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF PROJECTS

AND ACTVITIES METHOD



LAW 4014/2011

QUESTIONERS TO WORKERS, HABITTANTS, INDUSTIRIES

LANDSCAPE QUALITY

TOPOGRAPHICAL, CLIMATOLOGICAL,SOIL, CULTURAL

ASPECTS

PUBLIC QUESTIONER

Aristotle

Univer



A PUBLIC CONVERSATION TRUE

•THE MUNISIPALITY,

•THE PERFECTURE OR

•THE MINISTERY WEBPAGE

GIVES THE OPORTUNITY TO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE LIVING NEAR BY THE AREA WHERE FOREST OPERATIONS ARE GOING TO TAKE PLASE TO GIVE THEIR ASPECTS ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF THE PROBLEMS THAT MIGHT SHOW UP FROM THAT KIND OF PROJECT

LANDSCAPE QUALITY Specialists on EIA are contacting an evaluation

of the remaining situation before a Forest Operation Project take place

They collect climatologic, soil, sound, emission data

They make a map of the area with the nearest settlements, cultural or historical places, roadnet, railnet, ports, airports





Map of the Forest Operation Project



QUANTITY MEASUREMENTS



DESTINATIONS BETWEEN THE STAND WHERE THE FOREST OPERATIONS ARE GOING TO TAKE PLACE

AND THE NEAREST CITIES

EIA CRITERIA FOR ABSORPION



COMPATABILITY BETWEEN FOREST OPERATIONS & NATURE



The Mean Intensity was measured equal to each research, so by using the equation of compatability we get: C1 = MA1 X ME1 => C1 = 66,12 %

C2 = MA2 X ME2 => C2 = 70,806 %

C3 = MA3 X ME3 => C3 = 66,29%

ABSORPIONS RESULTS



WE VALUE: The average values for the optical absorption capacity of each selected area

WE TAKE IN CONSIDERATION THE: the slope terrain

WE ACCEPT AS BEST VALUE: The compatability value of each area MUST be over 60% and that makes our proposed development acceptable.

EIA’S PLANNING BASES ON



SEPARATION OF THE WORK IN STAGES: a) Field Work b) recording and processing of selected data

points c) designing of the proposed projects and d) presentation of final proposals to study the

sustainable development of the region e) run an EIA revaluation for the proposed

forest operations

FOREST OPERATIONS IN GREECE

Aristotle

University

of

Aristotle

U



CONCLUTIONS3E METHOD IS BASED ON: ECOLOGICAL ERGONOMICAL ECONOMICAL ASPECTS

ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF PROJECTS AND ACTVITIES METHOD BASED ON:

PUBLIC QUESTIONERS QUALITY ASPECTS OF LANDSCAPE QUANTITY ASPECTS OF NATURE & WORKERS



ADVANTAGES & DISSADVANTAGESBOTH METHODS ARE BASED : ON HUMAN OPINION SOIL AND EMISSIONS ARE EVALUATED

THOROWLY THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE PROJECT

So both of them are conserning workers and inhabbitants as well as nature, in order to make a proper evaluation of the impacts that forest operations have.



EIA’s disadvandages

Anfortunately to contact an EIA for every FO project is taking a long time, it costs and specialized personal is needed. Usually the enterprises don’t want to be

serious involved because of a high cost of that kind of evaluation.



ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR FOREST OPERATIONS USING TWO DIFFERENT METHODS_FORMEC-2013

Documents

Transcript of ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR FOREST OPERATIONS USING TWO DIFFERENT METHODS_FORMEC-2013