Wonderful, Enhanced, Me! (Feest van de Filosofie, Leuven, 5 April 2014)
-
Upload
maastrichtuniversity -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
0
Transcript of Wonderful, Enhanced, Me! (Feest van de Filosofie, Leuven, 5 April 2014)
Four questions for today
! What is enhancement?
! What is being enhanced?
! Should we be concerned about enhancement per se?
! What particular concerns should we have about the “enhancement enterprise”?
! Human Nature =
What is “Enhancement”
! Problem with the term “Enhancement” ! OED Definition: “An increase or improvement in quality, value, or extent.”
! Just a little value laden!
! Too coarse!
! French Philosopher Jérôme Goffette prefers the term “anthropotechnie”: « l'art ou la technique de transformation extra-médicale de l'être humain par intervention sur son corps »
! Maybe better to think about the “technological transformation of the human being by intervention in or on the body”
! Intervention that restores an individual or population norm (medical intervention)
! Intervention that makes us more than normal (enhancement)
! Blurry line between the two
! Georges Canguilhem ‘health is being more than normal’
A “capacity” approach
! We’ll stick with “enhancement”, but enhancement ≠ improvement or making us better overall
! Interventions in, on or around the body…but where does the body stop.
! Enhancement ≅ improvement of a specific capacity through an intervention that impacts upon the human body.
! Enhancement ≅ improvement of a specific capacity through an intervention that impacts upon the human body relations between the human organism and its environment.
Some questions for the capacity approach
! How to judge whether an alteration of a function is indeed the improvement of a capacity or a diminishment? ! Capacities only exist relative to demands made upon an
organism (the human being) by its environment.
! It is the environment that determines what capacities we have.
! Human environments are social as well as natural: the demands of our environment, the capacities the environment requires are our own doing. ! They are also the result of previous enhancements
! Conflict between environmental demands vis-à-vis capacities and our conception of the good life? Or our understanding of what it is for a human being to flourish?
A few more questions about capacities
! What is the “subject” of these capacities? Is there an essential “organism” that acquires capacities? ! What could that be since the organism and its constituent parts
are foremost understood in terms of what they do, their capacities.
! Or is the organism itself simply a bundle of capacities that has as its consequence the development of other capacities. Nature particularizes, therefore, to acquire further capacities.
The trap door: I am an enhancement
! Capacities approach to the question of enhancement is the right one.
! But it leads to some surprising conclusions: self-consciousness is a technological enhancement
! Why technological? ! Self-Consciousness most likely arose in communities of
language using primates
! It’s a capacity made possible by another capacity/enhancement: language – a kind of technology
! A capacity that allows us to ask ourselves ‘What am I doing?’
Should we be concerned about “enhancement” generally
speaking?
The harshest criticisms of biomedical enhancements appear to apply to enhancements per se, whether biomedical or not. […] if we accept that view, we would not only have to reject cognitive enhancement drugs, but must also regard literacy, institutions, and the agrarian revolution in a highly unfavourable light as well.
- Allen Buchanan, Beyond Humanity, p. 26
Some particular concerns
“We’ve decided as a society that it’s too expensive to modify the kid’s environment. So we have to modify the kid.”
- Dr Michael Anderson (child psychiatrist), Canton, Georgia, USA (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/09/health/attention-disorder-or-not-children-prescribed-pills-to-help-in-school.html?pagewanted=all)
“modifying the kid” ! The enhancement gap already exists
! Vaccination (rich vs. poor countries)
! Language and cognition (within unequal rich countries) ! “By age 3, a poor child would have heard 30 million fewer words in
his home environment than a child from a professional family. And the disparity mattered: the greater the number of words children heard from their parents or caregivers before they were 3, the higher their IQ and the better they did in school.”
! Flattening out of capacities ! Liberal approach does not fear this – an enhancement market
! From “everyone’s enhanced” to “everyone is impaired” ! “Normal” humans cannot cope with socially structured
demands of the environment: “it’s too expensive to modify the kid’s environment”