WHY THE PROVISION OF SECURITY AND JUSTICE FOR WOMEN FROM SEXUAL VIOLENCE SO INEFFECTIVE IN NIGERIA.
Transcript of WHY THE PROVISION OF SECURITY AND JUSTICE FOR WOMEN FROM SEXUAL VIOLENCE SO INEFFECTIVE IN NIGERIA.
WHY THE PROVISION OF SECURITY AND JUSTICE FOR WOMEN FROM
SEXUAL VIOLENCE SO INEFFECTIVE IN NIGERIA.
INTRODUCTION
Women all over the world, face discrimination based on their
gender, ethnicity, religion, class, sex, which impedes their
access to security and justice. Sexual violence is a global
problem with mostly women and children being at risk because
of their subordinate status in the society (Bourdilon, 2000;
Abrahams, et al., 2014). Sexual violence comes in different
context and forms, because it mostly take place in different
circumstances and settings, these include for example;
Forced marriage, which include child marriage, sexual abuse
of children, forced abortion, denial of the right to use
contraception or to protect against sexually transmitted
diseases, systematic rape during armed conflict, rape within
marriage, rape by strangers, sexual harassment, forced
prostitution and trafficking amongst other.
Although men do experience sexual violence, however, the
prevalence is higher among children and women (Tilman et
al., 2010). The adverse effect of sexual related violence on
the health of the victim is tremendous (Kiesel, 2006).
Sexual violence can be traumatic with long lasting effect on
the victim; they could experience various physical and
psychological problems. Similarly, victims risk the
likelihood of being infected with sexually transmitted
diseases, low self-esteem, behavioral problems, suicidal
thoughts, drug abuse, depression; amongst other are some of
the unhealthy consequences that can be caused as a result of
sexual violence (Saunders & Kindy, 1993). In addition the
violence against the woman may lead to unwanted pregnancy
(Holmes, et al., 1996).
Brown worth (1995) and Kiesel (2006) observed that more than
750,000 women are either rape or sexually assaulted annually
but fewer than half report it. Which is the most distressing
aspect of it is, many of these go on unreported, evidence
has it that women in developing countries experience sexual
violence at a disturbing rates however, these women are less
likely to report or seek help (Tilman, Bryant-Davis, Smith &
Marks, 2010). The narrative is same in Nigeria, for
instance, a survey carried out by the National and Safety in
2012 has it that sexual violence compared to other major
crime is underreported notwithstanding the high prevalence.
Lack of economic freedom, inadequate legal protection,
absence of institutional specialized capacity and services,
fear of reprisal and exclusion, prejudices within the
society and the justice system and poor public services by
non-governmental organizations are some of the specific
obstacles that contribute to the continued violence against
women and also made access to justice and security
ineffective (Harding, 2008). This essay subsequently, will
look at why the provisions of justice and security for women
from sexually violence so ineffective, by taking a closer
look at other salient factors that have been overlooked
especially in Nigeria where factors such as culture and
tradition play an important role in dictating people’s way
of life.
CULTURE
Social and cultural factors influence the way of life in
most African society; the long-established African
patriarchal society regulates the gender power structure
(Ifemeje, 2008). The culture has contributed to women
subordination beneath men, which result in gender inequality
and discrimination (Okolo, 2008: 6). In such societies
gender relations are defined by segregation of roles between
men and women, this is derived primarily from religion,
culture and traditional beliefs where men have more right
than women (Odimeqwu & Okemgbo, 2003, Okolo, 2008).
In Nigeria, ‘women are brought up in an atmosphere where,
they are expected to obey established social norms such as
how they should view and orient themselves and what kind of
attitude they should take on various occasion’ (Odimeqwu &
Okemgbo, 2003: 225). Notwithstanding, the fact that those
women play a key role in the economic, social, religious and
cultural sustenance of their local communities (Dankelem &
Davidson, 1997). They nonetheless continue to endure social,
economic, physical, psychological and sexual exploitation in
the name of religion, customs and tradition (Anyogu, 2008).
Violence against women is often embedded in social customs
that allows it to be perpetrated with impunity, such
violence and inequality arises from intricate array of
closely knitted factors, which includes traditions, gender
norms and social acceptance of violence as a means of
conflict resolution (Abama & Kwaja, 2009). These seemingly
dominant cultural and customary enforcements have so far
frustrated the elimination of gender based violence
(Ifemeje, 2008). Thus rendering the provision of security
and justice to women within such communities ineffective.
The Nigerian culture makes it hard for a woman to say no,
especially married women. Warped and selfish interpretation
of religious doctrines, especially where spouses are
involved, the woman "is not supposed to complain". Thus,
they suffer injustice in silence, rape and sexual violence
by intimate partners despite the mounting evidences remains
unchecked simply because of the woman’s inability to assert
her right (Foluso, 2011). Men learn to be aggressive and
dominant through socialization, they carry such to their
homes, As a result, because the culture expects the woman to
only cry and not speak out when faced with challenges, the
woman subsequently operate in silence thus giving room for
continued oppression from their partners (Okolo, 2008: 1)
Men regard marriage as entailing obligation on women to be
sexually available at any given time (Jewkes & Abrahams).
Women lack equal power to negotiate safe sex in intimate
union, the culture upholds and entrenches man authority in
the home, the custom of paying ‘bride price’ whereby the man
essentially ‘purchase’ their wives sexual favors underscore
men’s entitlement to dictate the terms of sex (Abama &
Kwaja, 2009). Thus, the prevalence of rape and other sexual
violence has often been associated with social norms around
the use of violence as a means to achieve objectives. Rape
and sexual violence is common in societies where the
ideology of male superiority is strong emphasizing
dominance, physical strength and male honor (Sandy, 1981).
This belief systems grant women limited options in refusing
sexual advance. Subsequently, Most men exclude the
possibility that their sexual advances towards a woman might
be rejected or that a woman has the right to make an
autonomous decision about participating in sex (Bennett et
al., 2000).
Men are held to be unable to control their sexual urges in
many cultural settings with the woman being at the receiving
end for provoking the desire in men. The prevailing ideas
about the status of women and sexuality in such community
determine how families and communities react to sexual
violence and rape. The cultural solution in some societies
is to marry off the victim to the rapist, thereby
‘preserving the integrity’ of the woman and her family
(Heise, 1993). For instance, Aborisade (2014) in his
research came across a respondent who was raped by her
classmate; her father in response stopped her “from
reporting in order to ‘protect’ the family name”
“I called my father as soon as it happened and told him
everything. I told him I was going to report the boy to the
school authority but he asked me not to go ahead with such
plan...he said it would do me more harm than good. When I
still insisted after that, he got annoyed and instructed me
not to report, as it would rub the family name in the mud”
(Aborisade, 2014; 6)
Similarly, other families may rather put pressure on the
victim to obtain financial damages from the rapist family
rather than reporting or suing (Watts, 1998). Subsequently,
the family and community response to sexual violence and
rape is to blame the woman and concentrating instead on
restoring ‘lost’ family honor, without punishing the men.
Blame the Victim
Where such violence is narrowed down into blaming the victim
as having encouraged the act; the perpetrator could be
excused on the ground the victim asked for it through her
actions because men cannot control their sexual impulses.
The society that is meant to protect such victims is
completely intolerant to them (Amaka-Okafor, 2013; Chiedu,
2013). This usually result in the survivors remaining silent
about the crime, despite the fact that there are no laws
regulating dressing in Nigeria, survivors of rape are often
perceived as facilitating their victimization through
indecent dressing and/or suggestive attitudes, as such,
victims of rape or sexual violence are often seen as the bad
eggs within the society. Thus, blamed for leading their
assailants to the crime (Aborisade, 2014).
Similarly, acts such as touching the breast, seductive gaze
amongst other that could degenerate to violent rape are most
times disregarded or trivialized (Olukemi & Folakemi, 2015).
Most culture trivialized the issues concerning sexual
violence for example; doubting the case of rape and sexual
violence is common, people usually raises the question of
whether the act has taken place especially where there are
no obvious injuries on the victim. Similarly, the belief
that women say no when they mean yes is counterproductive in
reporting rape or sexual violence, because some do believe
that if a woman doesn’t physically resist though resisted
verbally than it isn’t rape. Such response, not only does it
create an environment in which rape can occur with impunity
but also shuts out any possible avenue for the victim to
seek justice and protection. Sexual violence is not
perceived as a serious problem that should be tackled, it is
usually taken for granted; victims are left to tackle it on
individual basis (Abe, 2012).
Perhaps that explains why some men feel that engaging in
sexual violence is normal, while on the other hand, because
of how trivialized it is, victims may be uncertain as to
what kind of response they will get from friends, family and
state institutions, as such they remain silent, accordingly
Gurvinder & Dinesh, highlighted that sexual related violence
is likely to occur in culture that fosters beliefs of male
superiority and cultural inferiority to women (Gurvinder &
Dinesh, 2013). Where the woman discloses the crime; she
stands to forfeit her place in the community and in most
cases her husband and in extreme cases she might even lose
her life, in societies where there is a taboo on female
sexuality, women may not be able to discuss sexual crimes
with male police officers. Women in most circumstances
perceive rape and sexual violence as a fact of life, under
these circumstances; they are pressured not to report such
violence to authorities by either their family or community
(Seelinger, Silverberg & Mejia 2011). Such are the myriad
obstacles facing victims of sexual violence in reporting an
assault. Because women are perceived as keepers of family
virtue and female modesty is enshrined in law and customs.
Stigma
Gender bias that exposes the women to further ridicule after
being abused Arising from the above explains, why most women
hardly report cases of abuse. "Shame", to expose oneself as
having been abused; it may even put off suitors as the
society always remembers her as the "abused woman"; it's
hardly forgotten that she was once abused. In fact the
society May even celebrate the perpetrator instead of having
sympathy for the victim. The social stigma attached to
sexual violence and rape is an important social factor that
impact women access to justice and security in Nigeria. The
fear of stigma and isolation by the society imposes a
culture of silence, thereby, preventing the victims from
reporting (Kullima, Kawuwa, Audu, Mairiga & Bukar, 2010).
The assumed dishonor associated with rape or sexual violence
may encourage such silence because no one wants to be seen
as a victim of sexual assault. For example, in an empirical
research carried out by Aborisade (2014) across tertiary
institutions in Nigeria. He found out that 60.87% of the
respondents were advised by their friends not to report, in
order to avoid social stigmatization. Below is a response
from one of his respondent.
‘...I cannot report because our people don’t like to
associate with girls that are raped. Even I noticed that as
soon as it happened to me, most of my neighbors were no
longer free with me. Several times they will be whispering,
talking about me, once I approach them, they will stop and
start making gestures to themselves. I had to move out of
that house because of that...’ (Aborisade, 2014)
The fear of social stigmatization has forced victims to
conceal rape and sexual violence, in order to be protected
from public embarrassment and shame; it has also made it
difficult for families to expose the rapist (Achunike &
Kitause, 2014).
The prevalence of cultural taboos concerning sexuality is
attributed to the underreporting of sexual violence in
African countries, making rape a topic that is avoided in
the public discourse (Duroch, McRae & Grais, 2011), while
other researchers are of the view that sexual violence is
not accorded much priority because it is perceived as a
gender issue (Motsei 2007; Du Toit, 2009). The culture of
double standards, further influences silence, for example,
everything a male child does is permitted by the culture,
girls on the other hand, are treated like commodities or
properties, this culture according to, Ariffin (1997) could
be blamed for the belief that women are responsible for
provoking sexual desires in men who unable to control their
urges (Ariffin, 1997). Subsequently, fear induced by this
same culture may prevent the survivor of rape or sexual
violence from disclosing the assault (Brown-Miller, 1975).
In situation where the assailant is influential or in areas
where there are strong community ties whereby the victim may
be related to the perpetrator may aid silence. The
interwoven and conservative rural culture makes it difficult
for the victim to turn to outsiders for help (Smit &
Plessis, 2011).
Education
Educational factors have slowed down the eradication of the
male superiority syndrome, which is deeply entrenched in
most cultures across Nigeria (Chika & Nneka, 2014). Parents
elect to educate male children while ignoring the female,
especially in the northern part of Nigeria. The high rate of
female illiteracy impedes the elimination of gender based
violence, as uneducated women especially in the rural areas
are not conscious of their rights, much less understand ways
to demand them, research has shown that they have conceded
that acts of violence perpetrated by their partners is
customary and accepted of by their culture (‘Facts and
figures’, 2007). Women in Nigeria, in consequence of the
patriarchal nature of Nigerian’s sociological background,
are confronted with many institutionalized barriers, which
have seriously impeded the full realization and protection
of their rights (Ifemeje, 2011).
Legal and Institutional Arrangements
‘The ability to claim one’s rights and seek a remedy is
influenced first and foremost by the contents of the laws
that establish these rights and regulate the processes for
claiming their protection. While in numerous countries
progress has been achieved in the formulation and adoption
of more gender equitable legislative and regulatory
frameworks during the last two decades, in others, explicit
discrimination against women continues to be perpetuated’
(OHCHR 2013).
Nigeria still relies on outdated laws that were enacted
decades ago, in spite of the global shift towards
eradicating violence against women which ended up in many
states establishing gender based violence defined laws
(Ifemeje, 2008). Remarkably, victims of sexual violence are
made to turn to the provisions on assault and battery, which
is not only discriminatory but also grossly inadequate; the
elimination of violence against women in Nigeria has been
impeded through the meshing of various legal instruments
like the non-enactment of most international covenants on
women’s right by the government, the subsistence of a host
of already established outdated legislations which are
prejudiced against women and finally the non existence of a
gender based law.
Although Nigerian government is signatory to most
international instrument on women’s right, however, most of
these laws directed at ensuring gender equality are not
adopted by the government. This can be attributed to the
fact that the national assembly must first enact adoption of
such laws according to section 12 of the Nigerian
constitution into law, therefore because they are not part
of the municipal laws, these international instruments
remain unenforceable until they are enacted by the law
making body (Ifemeje, 2008). Lapses and gaps in the
enforcement of existing national laws on gender rights and
the non-domestication of the Convention on the Elimination
of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and
other important legislations on gender rights acts as
impediment to women access to security and justice (Chika &
Nneka, 2014).
Looking at some of the indigenous statutory laws in Nigeria,
for instance, shows an unfortunate discriminatory gender
bias, section 6 of the Criminal Code, applicable mostly in
the southern part of Nigeria, has expressly legalized
spousal rape, the provision of the section read thus
‘Unlawful carnal knowledge means carnal connection which
takes place otherwise between husband and wife’ (Criminal
Code Act, 1916). Therefore, according to this provision a
husband can never be accused of molesting his partner. This
not only provides a breading field for violence against the
wife, it also impedes their access to justice. Amaka-Okafor
(2013) blamed the non-acknowledgement of rape amid spouses
by the law as an instrument that encourages the culture of
rape, this, she maintained might have accounted for the low
reportage of rape.
Similarly, section 353 and 360 of the Criminal Code further
shows the gender discrimination and inequality when it comes
to punishment, while section 353 makes indecent assault
against male a felony punishable with three years
imprisonment, section 360 on the other hand makes similar
offence on women a misdemeanor punishable with a maximum of
two years (Criminal Code Act, 1916). Finally, section 138 of
the Evidence Act makes it impossible for the victim to
secure conviction of her assailant, because it lays the
liability on the victim to prove her case beyond reasonable
doubt (Evidence Act, 2011). This according to Okonkwo (2003)
poses a grueling task for the prosecution because of the
exclusive nature of the crime, which is committed behind
closed doors. The shortcomings of the law, which sates that
victims must proved that consent was not given and
established that penetration occurred has encouraged silence
(Folayan, Odetoyinbo, Harrison & Brown, 2014).
With legal and law enforcements institutions far away from
the people, physical access to legal system may be difficult
especially to victims living in remote rural communities,
the travel required to report a crime can be a significant
obstacle, even where one is able to travel, some victims may
not know where to go (Seelinger et al., 2011). Many of the
victims have no prior experience with the legal system
therefore do not know how to proceed in sexual violence
cases (Kelly et al., 2005). The process of going through the
legal system may also be distressing to many victims, not
only do they risk being constrained to do so in the face of
deep-rooted gender biases and rape myths underlying the very
system charge with providing them with justice but they may
also experience immense psychological struggle from having
to come forward (Seelinger et al., 2011). Because the
process of getting redress is often cumbersome, the victim
risks being exploited in the process.
Despite the increase in number of incidents of rape and
sexual violence, Statistics shows that only one in 50 cases
of rape are reported (Chiedu, 2013). Thus, it is widely
describe as ‘a crime whose victims love to remain anonymous’
(Yishua, 2011: 23). According to the survey carried out by
the National Crime and Safety (2012) the police
insensitivity have discouraged most victims from reporting
and while those that have reported were unsatisfied with the
handling of the case. Victims are often reluctant to report
because of the already established mistrust between the
victim and the official to whom the assault is reported
(Kiesel, 2006). The insensitivity of police officers often
deters the victims from coming forward. The reaction of law
enforcement agents in relation to rape is reflective of the
apprehension of the crime in the society; the law
enforcement agents are usually opinionated in handling rape
cases (Abati, 2009; Ogbo, 2013).
This issue of underreporting just goes to shows the failure
of the state to create structures that would sway victims to
step forward (Ogbo, 2013). Although non-reporting according
to Willis (2011) is counter productive and may leave victims
without help and support which will only continue the cycle
of sexual violence. He however, fails to take into
consideration of secondary victimization by the police,
which is another factor that explains the low reports of
rape and other violence against women (Amaka-Okafor, 2013).
There reports in various quarters, which have it that, the
police generally subscribe to the belief that, it is
impossible for a woman to be rape by her partner.
subsequently, they make mockery out of the victim’s claim.
This in essence makes the victims lack confidence in the
criminal justice system (Chiedu 2013)
Another factor that impedes women access to justice is the
process of investigation, because of the sensitive nature of
it, victims may have greater difficulty speaking about their
ordeal, similarly most investigators tend to be male, which
creates a gender dynamic that may be uncomfortable for
victims of rape and sexual violence, in some cases,
regardless of the gender most police officers are not
trained for sensitive issues such as rape and sexual
violence (Seelinger et al., 2011). Consequently victims may
be reluctant to speak up or report to the police especially
where such victims live in the same community with the
assailants because of the fear of retaliation.
In the same vain, judgment or cultural taboo may affect the
victim especially in cases of sexual violence where
terminology can be vague or embarrassing, Victim’s ability
to recount the experience may be impacted by trauma; this
can subsequently complicate responsiveness to questioning
and because the police officers are not trained to work
through a victim’s psychological difficulties, it often
leads to flawed interpretations. This is also true in
situations where the law enforcement officer doesn’t speak
the victim’s first language, the flawed interpretation may
lead to confusion, misunderstanding and unjustified concerns
about the victim’s credibility, this present a huge
challenge to rapport building and a victim willingness to
proceed. Also, where the victim and the investigating
officer/interpreter come from the same community, security
and confidentiality of the victim maybe compromised
(Seelinger et al., 2011).
Finally, unsatisfactory synergy between police and
prosecutors, weakness of testimony, lack of efficient
interrelationship between medical care providers and the
legal system, careless trial procedures that may exacerbate
a victim’s ordeal. Structural and resource constraint in law
enforcement, forensic analysis and the court are some of the
obstacles that impeded women from getting access to justice
(Seelinger et al., 2011).
Conclusion
At the heart of sexual violence directed against women is
gender inequality, which is driven by so many factors
operating in a range of social cultural context, which
subsequently impedes access to security and justice. Without
the government addressing the existing culture and customs,
which legitimize and trivialize violence against women in
most communities, the cycle of violence will continue.
Although reducing or eliminating gender based violence may
be difficult because of the already established norms within
the society. Protecting women and providing them an
effective avenue to justice will have to start by doing away
with the archaic customs and traditions that infringes on
their rights, educating and orienting the women on their
fundamental rights is a start. At the same time, there is
also a need to sensitized especially the law enforcement
officer who unfortunately are also part of the cultural
problem, having grown up with the perception of women not
having rights, being enlightened on human rights
implications of gender discrimination will make them more
sensitive and responsive to gender based violence.
The high recurrence of sexual violence and the
underreporting highlights the urgency for definitive
response to address it, such as repealing laws that
discriminate against women and enacting and adopting laws
that promote gender equality, laws that has zero tolerance
to rape and important international instrument such as the
CEDAW needs to be adopted by the legislature because such
instruments provides a platform for women to agitate for
their rights.
For women to have confidence in the judiciary the judiciary
needs to be proactive in handling cases of rape and sexual
violence, because investigated and presented evidence maybe
be wasted in situations where the judiciary are not
sensitized or conversant with the laws regarding sexual
violence. Like Turquet (2011) maintained, an operational and
accessible justice system is crucial for women to actualize
their right because the judiciary has the potential to shape
society by preventing impunity, implementing accountability
and creating new social norm.
Reference
Anon(2002) 'Rough Justice'. People 58 (10), 64
Abama, E. and Kwaja, C. (2009) 'Violence Against Women in Nigeria: How the Millennium Development Goals Addresses the Challenge'. The Journal ofPan African Studies (Online) 3 (3), 23
Abdulkadir, I., Umar, L. W., Musa, H. H., Musa, S., Oyeniyi, O. A., Ayoola-Williams, O. M., and Okeniyi, L. (2011) 'Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of Cases seen at General Hospital Suleja, Niger State'. Annals of Nigerian Medicine 5 (1), 15
Abe, I. (2012) 'Defining and Awareness of Sexual Harassment among Selected University Students in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria'. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies 3 (3), 212-218
Aborisade, R. A. (2014) 'Barriers to Rape Reporting for Nigerian Women: The Case of Female University Students'. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 7 (2)
Abrahams, N., Devries, K., Watts, C., Pallitto, C., Petzold, M., Shamu, S., and García-Moreno, C. (2014) 'Worldwide Prevalence of Non-Partner Sexual Violence: A Systematic Review'. The Lancet 383 (9929), 1648-1654
Achunike, H. C. and Kitause, R. H. (2014) 'Rape Epidemic in Nigeria: Cases, Causes, Consequences and Responses to the Pandemic'. IMPACT Int JRes Appl Natl Soc Sci 2, 31-44
Anyogu, F. (2009) Access to Justice in Nigeria: A Gender Prespective.: Ebenezer Productions Nigeria Limited
Amaka-Okafor, V. (2013) Nigeria Has A Rape Culture Too [online] available from<http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/14/nigeria-rape-india-culture> [16 July 2015]
Ariffin, R., Selvaraju, S., Samuel, R., and Lourdes, C. (1997) 'Shame Secrecy and Silence: Study on Rape in Penang.
Bourdilon, T. (2000). Violence against women and Millennium goals. Washington. CARE
Buckley, T. (1988) Blood Magic: The Anthropology of Menstruation.: Univ of California Press
Cantalupo, N. C. (2010) 'How should Colleges and Universities Respond toPeer Sexual Violence on Campus? what the Current Legal Environment Tells Us'. NASPA Journal about Women in Higher Education 3 (1), 52-87
Cavanaugh, R. M. (2002) 'Self-Mutilation as a Manifestation of Sexual Abuse in Adolescent Girls'. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 15 (2), 97-100
Chika, I. S. (2011) 'Legalization of Marital Rape in Nigeria: A Gross Violation of Women's Health and Reproductive Rights'. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law 33 (1), 39-46
Chika, I. S. (2012) 'Gender-Based Domestic Violence in Nigeria A Socio-Legal Perspective'. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 19 (1), 137-148
Chika, I. S. and Nneka, U. (2014) 'Discriminatory Cultural Practices andWomen’s Rights among the Igbos of South-East Nigeria: A Critique'. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization 25, 18-27
Criminal Code Act, (1916) Criminal Code Act-Partiii-IV [online] available from <http://www.nigeria-law.org/Criminal%20Code%20Act-PartIII-IV.htm> [17 July 2015]
Dobash, R. E. and Dobash, R. (1979) Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy.: Free Press New York
Dunkelman, I. and Davidson, J. (1988) 'Women and Environment in the Third World: Alliance for the Future'
Duroch, F., McRae, M., and Grais, R. F. (2011) 'Description and Consequences of Sexual Violence in Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of Congo'. BMC International Health and Human Rights 11, 5-698X-11-5
Du Toit, L. (2009) A Philosophical Investigation of Rape: The Making and Unmaking of theFeminine Self.: Routledge
Evidence Act, (2011) Evidence Act [online] available from <http://www.nigeria-law.org/EvidenceAct.htm#ProductionAndEffectOfEvidence> [18 July 2015]
Folayan, M. O., Odetoyinbo, M., Harrison, A., and Brown, B. (2014) 'Rapein Nigeria: A Silent Epidemic among Adolescents with Implications for HIV Infection'. Global Health Action 7, 25583
Foluso, F. (2011) 'Gender, Transitional Justice and Development'. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 30, 2341-2344
Gonzalez Montes, S. (1998) 'Domestic Violence in Cuetzalan'. Mexico: Some Research
Gurvinder, K. & Dinesh, B. (2013). Sexual violence against women: understanding cross-cultural intersections. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 55(3). 244-249
Harding, J. (2008) Access To Justice And The Rule Of Law [online] 1st edn. ForcedMigration Review. available from <http://www.fmreview.org/FMRpdfs/FMR30/28-30.pdf> [16 July 2015]
Heise, L. (1993) 'Violence Against Women: The Missing Agenda'. The Health ofWomen: A Global Perspective 123
Holmes, M. M., Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G., and Best, C. L. (1996)'Rape-Related Pregnancy: Estimates and Descriptive Characteristics from a National Sample of Women'. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology175 (2), 320-325
Ifemeje, S. C. (2008) 'A Critique of Gender Discriminatory Practices in Igbo Customary Marriages'. Journal of Women and Minority Rights 1 (1), 57-61
Jewkes, R. and Abrahams, N. (2002) 'The Epidemiology of Rape and Sexual Coercion in South Africa: An Overview'. Social Science & Medicine 55 (7), 1231-1244
Kalra, G. and Bhugra, D. (2013) 'Sexual Violence Against Women: Understanding Cross-Cultural Intersections'. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 55(3), 244
Kelly, L., Lovett, J., and Regan, L. (2005) 'A Gap Or a Chasm? Attritionin Reported Rape Cases. Home Office Research Study 293. London: HomeOffice Research'. Development and Statistics Directorate
Kullima, A. A., Kawuwa, M. B., Audu, B. M., Mairiga, A. G., and Bukar, M. (2014) 'Sexual Assault Against Female Nigerian Students'. African Journal of Reproductive Health 14 (3), 189-193
Mollica, R. F. and Son, L. (1989) 'Cultural Dimensions in the Evaluationand Treatment of Sexual Trauma: An Overview.'. Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Motsei, M. (2007) The Kanga and the Kangaroo Court: Reflections on the Rape Trial of Jacob Zuma.: Spinifex Press
Odimegwu, C. and Okemgbo, C. N. (2003) 'Gender Role Ideologies and Prevalence of Violence Against Women in Imo State, Nigeria'. Anthropologist 5 (4), 225-236
Ogbo, P. (2013) Lagos Records 678 Rape Cases In One Year - [online] available from <http://theeagleonline.com.ng/lagos-records-678-rape-cases-in-one-year/> [20 July 2015]
OHCHR, (2013) Rural Women And Access To Justice [online] available from <http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CEDAW/AccesstoJustice/FAO.pdf> [13 July 2015]
Okolo, G. (2004) 'Violence Against Women'. Calabar: Baye Communications
Olukemi, A. A. and Folakemi, O. C. 'Culture of Silence and Wave of Sexual Violence in Nigeria'
Onah, N. (2010) 'Human Trafficking in Nigeria: A Christian Response'. Nsukka Journal of Religion and Cultural Studies 3 (1), 141-160
Onigbinde, I. and Awolusi, O. (2013) 'Computer-Sided Training Schedule and Data Processing Effectiveness in the Nigerian Private Institutions'. Journal of Manpower Development and Change 1 (1), 1-18
Sable, M. R., Danis, F., Mauzy, D. L., and Gallagher, S. K. (2006) 'Barriers to Reporting Sexual Assault for Women and Men: Perspectives of College Students'. Journal of American College Health 55 (3),157-162
Sanday, P. R. (1981) 'The socio‐cultural Context of Rape: A cross‐cultural Study'. Journal of Social Issues 37 (4), 5-27
Seelinger, K. T., Silverberg, H., and Mejia, R. (2011) . The Investigation andProsecution of Sexual Violence
Sen, P. (1999) 'Ending the Presumption of Consent. Non-Consensual Sex inMarriage: A Worldwide Programme. London'. Change
Sieder, R. and Sierra, M. T. (2010) Indigenous Women's Access to Justice in Latin America.: Chr. Michelsen Institute
Smit, D. and Du Plessis, V. (2011) 'Sexual Harassment in the Education Sector'. PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 14 (6), 172-217
Suarez, E. and Gadalla, T. M. (2010) 'Stop Blaming the Victim: A Meta-Analysis on Rape Myths'. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 25 (11), 2010-2035
Tillman, S., Bryant-Davis, T., Smith, K., and Marks, A. (2010) 'Shattering Silence: Exploring Barriers to Disclosure for African American Sexual Assault Survivors'. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 11 (2), 59-70
Turquet, L. (2011) 'Progress of the Worlds Women 2011-2012. in Pursuit of Justice.'
Watts, C., Keogh, E., Ndlovu, M., and Kwaramba, R. (1998) 'Withholding of Sex and Forced Sex: Dimensions of Violence Against Zimbabwean Women'. Reproductive Health Matters 6 (12), 57-65
Willis, M. (2011) 'Non-Disclosure of Violence in Australian Indigenous Communities'
Verelst, A., De Schryver, M., De Haene, L., Broekaert, E., and Derluyn, I. (2014) 'The Mediating Role of Stigmatization in the Mental Healthof Adolescent Victims of Sexual Violence in Eastern Congo'. Child Abuse & Neglect 38 (7), 1139-1146
Yishua, Olukorede. (2011) “Rape: A Crime Whose Victims Love to Remain Anonymous” The Nation Newspaper 26 September, 2011 p. 23.