Uncovering the experiences and needs of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection at diagnosis: a...

10
http://aph.sagepub.com/ Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health http://aph.sagepub.com/content/25/1/32 The online version of this article can be found at: DOI: 10.1177/1010539511413258 2013 25: 32 originally published online 31 July 2011 Asia Pac J Public Health Chirk Jenn Ng, Wah Yun Low, Li Ping Wong, Mohd Ridwan Sudin and Rosmawati Mohamed at Diagnosis : A Qualitative Study Uncovering the Experiences and Needs of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health can be found at: Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health Additional services and information for http://aph.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Email Alerts: http://aph.sagepub.com/subscriptions Subscriptions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Permissions: What is This? - Jul 31, 2011 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Dec 21, 2012 Version of Record >> at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013 aph.sagepub.com Downloaded from

Transcript of Uncovering the experiences and needs of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection at diagnosis: a...

http://aph.sagepub.com/Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health

http://aph.sagepub.com/content/25/1/32The online version of this article can be found at:

 DOI: 10.1177/1010539511413258

2013 25: 32 originally published online 31 July 2011Asia Pac J Public HealthChirk Jenn Ng, Wah Yun Low, Li Ping Wong, Mohd Ridwan Sudin and Rosmawati Mohamed

at Diagnosis : A Qualitative StudyUncovering the Experiences and Needs of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

  

Published by:

http://www.sagepublications.com

On behalf of: 

  Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health

can be found at:Asia-Pacific Journal of Public HealthAdditional services and information for    

  http://aph.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsEmail Alerts:

 

http://aph.sagepub.com/subscriptionsSubscriptions:  

http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:  

http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:  

What is This? 

- Jul 31, 2011 OnlineFirst Version of Record 

- Dec 21, 2012Version of Record >>

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health25(1) 32 –40

© 2013 APJPHReprints and permission:

sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navDOI: 10.1177/1010539511413258

http://aph.sagepub.com

413258 APHXXX10.1177/1010539511413258Ng et alAsia-Pacific Journal of Public Health

1 University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Corresponding Author:Chirk Jenn Ng, Department of Primary Care Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Email: [email protected]

Uncovering the Experiences and Needs of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection at Diagnosis:   A Qualitative Study

Chirk Jenn Ng, MBBS, MMed1, Wah Yun Low, MSc, PhD1, Li Ping Wong, MMedSc, PhD1, Mohd Ridwan Sudin, RN1, and Rosmawati Mohamed, MRCP, MD1

Abstract

Patients with hepatitis B face uncertainty at diagnosis. Information and support they receive at the early stage of the disease determine their adherence to follow up and treatment. This study aimed to explore the experiences and needs of patients with hepatitis B at diagnosis. A qualitative methodology was used. Nine focus groups (n = 44) were conducted to explore patients’ feelings and reaction to the diagnosis, encounters with health care professionals, and their needs. The transcribed data were analyzed using a thematic approach. Most patients were not prepared for the diagnosis and many felt anxious and distressed. This was attributed to poor patients’ knowledge, doctor’s emphasis on disease complications, and associated stigma. Information about the disease was lacking and patients wanted to know more about the mode of transmission, natural progres-sion of the disease, complications, and treatment options. There was a feeling of “passivity” among patients because there was often no active treatment available at diagnosis. This resulted in patients defaulting surveillance visits and missing the opportunity to start antiviral treatment. Therefore, there is an urgent need to provide sufficient information and education about hepatitis B to newly diagnosed patients, break “bad news” to patients with sensitivity, address their emotional needs, and emphasize on the rationale and importance of surveillance and treatment. This may entail public awareness campaign, implementation of pretest and posttest counseling, and educating doctors on how to communicate the diagnosis and management to patients accurately and sensitively.

Keywords

consumer health information, hepatitis B, chronic illnesses, focus group, qualitative research

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Ng et al. 33

Introduction

Hepatitis B is the most common viral hepatitis and cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer in the world, in particular among the Asian population.1-4 Recent advances in hepatitis B treatment have reaf-firmed the importance of regular surveillance and early detection of active disease so that effective antiviral treatment can be instituted.5-9 Timely intervention reduces the risk of complications significantly.10,11

However, the adherence to follow-up visits after diagnosis remains low.12,13 This is partly attributed to the fact that most patients are asymptomatic and the disease progression varies from individual to individual.14 Patients’ perception of hepatitis B, the information they receive, and their experiences with health care providers at diagnosis often shape their adherence to follow-up and treatment. It is therefore important to explore the barriers patients face at diagnosis that might influence their decision for future treatment and follow-up.

Besides the risk of clinical complications, hepatitis B, like most chronic diseases, might have an impact on patients’ emotional and social well-being.15,16 So far, research studies have focused on the experiences patients who have been living with the condition for some time.17 Few have looked at their experiences at diagnosis.

This study, therefore, aimed to explore the experiences and needs of patients when they were first diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B.

MethodsIn this study, we used a qualitative approach to capture the experiences of people with chronic hepatitis B when they were first diagnosed. Qualitative methodology aims to explore the behavior, interactions, meanings, values, and experiences of people in the “natural” context.18 We invited patients with hepatitis B, who participated in a hepatitis B survey at an outpatient hepatology clinic in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) (an urban tertiary hospital in Malaysia), to par-ticipate in focus group discussions (FGD). FGDs enrich the data by encouraging group interactions.

We used purposive sampling to recruit the patients, taking into consideration their age, gender, and ethnicity. Each focus group consisted of 4 to 6 participants who were grouped according to their preferred language, that is, English, Malay, or Chinese, as Malaysia is a multicultural country. A semistructured topic guide was developed by the researchers based on literature review and expert opinions. It covered 3 main topics, namely, health care experiences at diagnosis and during follow-up; physical, psychological, and social impact of hepatitis B on patients; and health care needs of patient with chronic hepatitis B. The topic guide was developed in English and translated into Malay and Chinese. Trained facilitators conducted the FGD in the respective language. This article only reports on the health care experiences and needs of the patients when they were first diagnosed with the illness.

The authors conducted the FGDs using the topic guide. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants prior to the FGD. The facilitators used open-ended, nondirective questions to facilitate the group discussion. Participants were encouraged to talk openly and voice out their views. The group discussion was audio-recorded with permission and field notes were taken by a note taker. This research project was approved by the UMMC Medical Ethics Committee.

The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and the transcripts were used as data for analysis. The data were managed by NVivo 2, a computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software. A thematic analysis approach was used.19

The researchers familiarized themselves with the data by reading the transcripts repeatedly. While keeping in mind the research questions (“what are the experiences and needs of patients

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from

34 Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 25(1)

with hepatitis B infection?”) and guided by the key topics in the FGD guide, main themes were extracted from the data and they formed the “nodes” for further coding. All researchers coded the transcripts using the same framework to ensure consistency. Subsequently, the coded nodes were summarized into subthemes and reported as shown below. No new themes emerged after 6 focus groups (2 in English, 2 in Malay, and 2 in Chinese). We conducted 3 additional focus groups, one in each language, to ensure saturation of the themes.

Two researchers coded the first 3 transcripts independently to ensure dependability. The research-ers used a reflexive approach to ensure that the analysis was as credible as possible. Any disagree-ment with the analysis was discussed and consensus reached at the researchers’ meeting.

ResultsA total of 44 patients with chronic hepatitis B infection participated in 9 focus groups. Their sociodemographic profile is shows in Table 1. The patients were diagnosed to have hepatitis B infection either through active screening or being detected accidentally during blood donation, medical checkups, and hospital admissions. Family history of hepatitis B played a significant role in prompting the patients to go for screening.

Table 1. Sociodemographic Profile of the Focus Group Participants

Characteristic Number (n = 44) Percentage Mean ± SD (Range)

Age (years) 42.1 ± 13.2 (20-67)Gender  

Male 21 47.7  Female 23 52.3  

Race  Malays 13 29.5  Chinese 28 63.6  Indians 2 4.5  Others 1 2.3  

Marital status  Not married 16 36.4  Married 26 59.1  Separated/divorced 1 2.3  Widow/widower 1 2.3  

Education level  No formal education 1 2.3  Primary 1 2.3  Secondary 20 45.4  College/university 22 50  

Occupation  Professional 9 20.4  Skilled 10 22.8  Unskilled 9 20.4  Unemployed 11 25  Housewife 5 11.4  

Mean number of years after diagnosis (n = 41)

12.63 ± 7.76 (1-30)

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Ng et al. 35

Three main themes emerged from the FGDs and they were categorized as follows:

• patients’ feelings of, reactions to, and coping with the diagnosis,• patients’ encounters with the health care professionals at diagnosis, and• patients’ needs at diagnosis.

Patients’ Feelings, Reactions, and Coping Strategy at DiagnosisPatients’ feelings and reaction to the diagnosis. The emotional reaction from the patients at

diagnosis varied considerably, ranging from “shocked,” “disbelief,” “upset,” “scared,” “anxious,” “not surprised” to acceptance.

I just wanted to do a routine blood test. I got a shock, you know. I couldn’t sleep. I was so depressed. I was anxious. (47-year-old woman)

I didn’t believe the results initially. I told them it was wrong. (47-year-old man)

What to do, have to accept it. (28-year-old man)

How patients felt depended on how much they knew about the condition. Those who were unaware of the complications of hepatitis B were less distressed and more likely to delay in seeking treatment. Those who were aware of the complications such as liver cancer were more anxious.

First, I don’t know anything about it. I didn’t feel anything. I didn’t feel sad. Just ordinary. (26-year-old man)

When I delivered my first child, I already knew I had hepatitis B. But, I just act as if I didn’t have and… I was giving birth like one a year. The doctor scolded me and said that I could pass the illness to my children. I didn’t know that hepatitis B could become chronic. (26-year-old woman)

I feel like it was, oh hepatitis B, straight away it’s going to be cancer of the liver and that’s it, you know. (47-year-old woman)

Few were willing to discuss openly about their condition because of fear of being discriminated by or causing anxiety to their social contacts. There was a stigma associated with hepatitis B.

I didn’t dare to let anyone know. I was afraid that people will be scared of me. I only let my family members know. I didn’t even let my friends know. (62-year-old woman)

I didn’t tell my family and friends. I myself take the responsibility . . . like my friends will be worried like sharing food . . . so I’ll control it myself. (23-year-old man)

So I told them I got hepatitis B, better don’t drink mine. I can drink yours but you cannot drink mine. (54-year-old woman)

Patients’ coping with the diagnosis. At diagnosis, patients with hepatitis B coped by not thinking about the condition and its potential complications.

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from

36 Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 25(1)

Emotionally, I can cope because I try to keep myself occupied all the time so I don’t want to think about it . . . I don’t want to think that hepatitis B can actually progress with time. (61-year-old man)

I wanted to be positive. I mean I don’t want to think that I have a disease. (51-year-old man)

I was young, that time was 20; so the idea of having cancer didn’t even come to me—because I was so young and active. (60-year-old man)

Some viewed hepatitis B as a disease with “no cure.” Treatment of hepatitis B was viewed as opportunistic depending on when the patients have active disease. There was a sense of “passiv-ity” in the way the patients viewed hepatitis B.

This disease cannot be cured. If we think too much, it’ll make us more ill. When I knew about the diagnosis, I just said, “Really?” That’s it. (43-year-old man)

Others adopted a more proactive attitude and searched for information regarding hepatitis B.

Doctor told me and I quickly searched for information and read about the disease. I also read the notes from my roommate who was a student nurse. (23-year-old man)

Patients’ Encounters With the Health Care Professionals at DiagnosisHow the diagnosis was communicated. The patients had varying experiences with the health care

professionals when they were first diagnosed with hepatitis B. Some felt that the doctors were trying to allay their anxiety by reassuring them that the condition was benign.

The doctor said liver cancer takes many years, may be 30 to 40 years, or may be liver cancer won’t develop at all. The doctor said, it’s not easy to get cancer—it’s like striking lottery. (62-year-old woman)

Others became more anxious after the doctors discussed the diagnosis with them.

He (the doctor) told me “Do you know that hepatitis B can cause cancer?” He didn’t say that to motivate me; he said it in a way as if I could infect others . . . like I am going to die now. (26-year-old woman)

Information and arrangement for follow-up. Posttest counseling was inconsistent; some received medical advice and follow-up whereas others only received brief advice from the pharmacists or laboratory technicians. Some did not receive any counseling but sought information on their own via newspapers, books, friends, and families.

So my friends told me it’s quite serious. We must take care. I cannot drink alcohol. That’s all (46-year-old woman)

In fact, when I came to know about this disease, I just know the results from the report. No doctor explained to me. I found out that the antigen means I am a carrier. (23-year-old man)

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Ng et al. 37

There was no uniform follow-up practice after the patients were diagnosed with hepatitis B infection.

In fact, I wasn’t told to check every 6 months. (60-year-old man)

Patients’ Needs at DiagnosisThe patients highlighted their needs, in particular their desire for emotional support and information about transmission, prevention, complications, available treatments, and prognosis.

At the end, still a big question. More questions than answers. (58-year-old man)

What can I do? What can I eat? What can’t I eat? (23-year-old man)

He just say you are a hepatitis B carrier. I did ask the question as in so is there any medicine that I can take and all that. There is nothing you can take. So that’s about it. (36-year-old woman)

For me, I’d like to know more like after 10 years what happen; after 20 years, what happen; when we can have the medicine and what treatment. (32-year-old woman)

Patients with hepatitis B highlighted the difficulty in accessing accurate information about the diagnosis and treatment. There was variation in how, who and what information was delivered at the time of diagnosis. Some of the information provided was inaccurate.

First, I don’t know anything about this (hepatitis B). Then only I ask the doctor how (it can be transmitted). Then only he told me I can get it from having sex. Another thing is food, you can get it from food outside. Some more drink beer. (26-year-old man)

Still there were all kinds of thoughts of how this disease is going to infect other people. At the beginning, people said through saliva. So we kept separate bowls, spoons, everything also separate. (58-year-old man)

There is need to deliver health information in a manner that can be understood by the patients.

The doctor explained but I don’t really understand what they are talking about. Somehow I know it’s not very harmful at this (early) stage. (21-year-old woman)

DiscussionThe patients in this study were not ready for the screening outcome and many were emotionally distressed by the “bad news.” This was partly attributed to the lack of knowledge and how the diagnosis was communicated to them. Patients wanted to know more about the disease, its trans-mission, complications, treatment, and prognosis. However, accurate information was not easily accessible. There was also a wide variation in how patients were counseled and managed at diag-nosis, and followed up subsequently. Currently, few clinical practice guidelines on management of chronic hepatitis B provide guidance on patient counseling at the time of diagnosis.4,5

Many studies have focused on the update of hepatitis B screening; little attention was paid to the pretest and posttest counseling.1,2 People experience considerable anxiety when they undergo screening. This is often because of inadequate knowledge about the condition and its complications, the predictive value of the tests, and the treatment options and follow-up plan if tested positive.20

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from

38 Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 25(1)

As a result, people who are screened positive are uncertain about what they should do next. This issue is particularly common in countries, including Malaysia, where screening could be performed at commercial laboratories and no medical advice is provided. The emotional distress experienced by the patients in this study highlighted the importance of pretest and posttest counseling and follow-up for people who are undergoing hepatitis B screening. The information should include the need for a repeat serological test if screened positive, natural progression of hepatitis B, importance of regular surveillance for timely antiviral treatment, and early detection of complications.

In this study, the patients’ encounters with the health care professionals affected their initial reaction to the diagnosis and influenced their subsequent help-seeking behavior.21 Inappropriate reassurance creates unrealistic expectation whereas overemphasis on the disease complications causes unnecessary anxiety. Diagnosis of hepatitis B is “bad news” to patients and it should therefore be communicated with sensitivity. This requires the doctor to explain the diagnosis, complication, and management in a balanced and realistic manner.22

Another major concern patients had at diagnosis was how the disease was transmitted and whether they could infect their family and friends. They were unaware that vertical transmission is the most common mode of transmission locally. Many still believed that hepatitis B could be transmitted via saliva and they avoided sharing food and utensils with their close contacts. As a result, most patients would only disclose their hepatitis B carrier status to their immediate families but not to their friends and relatives. Dispelling this myth is crucial to destigmatize hepatitis B, to remove self-imposed social restriction, and to reduce emotional distress. Public awareness campaigns and continuing professional education should stress on the common route of transmis-sion according to the disease epidemiology in the region.1 Information on hepatitis B should be made easily available in hospitals and the primary care setting.

In addition, the patients were unaware of the treatment options of hepatitis B and adopted a “passive” attitude toward the treatment. This is partly because of the lack of definitive treatment for hepatitis B at diagnosis when the disease is inactive. There is also no evidence to advocate lifestyle changes and prescribe specific medications for chronic hepatitis B at diagnosis if there is no active disease.3 This is in contrast to other chronic diseases, such as diabetes and hypertension, where lifestyle modification and medications are often instituted at early stage of the disease. As a result, patients may not see the necessity and urgency to be followed up regularly, especially when they are asymptomatic and there are cost implications. It is, therefore, important for the health care professionals to explain to the patients that regular monitoring will help in early detection of disease activity and complications. This may improve patients’ adherence to follow-up and treatment later.

There are a few limitations in this study. First, the patients recruited in this study had been diagnosed with hepatitis B for an average of more than 10 years. There might be recall bias when they discussed their experience at diagnosis. However, judging from the patients’ ability to describe and recollect their feelings and encounters with the health care professional with considerable details, the chances of recall bias is less likely. Furthermore, the patients were able to describe the change in their feelings and health care experiences over time; this is helpful for them to identify their health care needs at diagnosis.

Second, this study was conducted in an outpatient hepatology clinic of an urban tertiary hospital. The research findings are restricted to patients with hepatitis B who have secondary education and easy access to health information and services. The findings are not transferable to patients who are less educated and in the rural setting, where their informational access might be less and the impact of the hepatitis B on their emotional and social well-being might be different. Further studies are needed to explore the experiences and needs of patients from a different socioeconomic background.

Third, although the use of FGD encourages interaction among participants by creating group dynamics, some participants may not be comfortable in sharing their personal experience with the group, in particular those pertaining to sexual and relationship issues. Individual in-depth interviews

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Ng et al. 39

may be used to overcome this limitation and the interview findings served as a form of triangulation. This should be considered in future studies.

This study highlights the need to provide timely and accurate health information for patients during screening and at diagnosis. This requires the healthcare professionals to be trained to provide routine pretest and posttest counseling when conducting hepatitis B screening. The health care professionals should also be sensitive to the emotions of the patient when breaking “bad news.” Appropriate reassurance and stepwise patient education over a few consultations may be needed to avoid information overload and causing patient anxiety. However, the importance of regular surveillance and availability of antiviral treatment should be explained and emphasized at the early stage of diagnosis. Addressing the information needs of patients with chronic hepatitis B at diagnosis is one way of ensuring that patients are adherent to follow ups and less likely to miss the opportunity in receiving timely antiviral treatment.

ConclusionsThis study found that the emotional and social well-being of patients with hepatitis B was affected at diagnosis. There was a wide practice variation in how patients were counseled, treated, and followed up at diagnosis. There is, therefore, an urgent need to address patients’ informational, emotional, and social needs when the diagnosis of hepatitis B is made. Healthcare strategy must be developed and implemented to standardize patient education at diagnosis to reduce practice variation in care provision for patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research project was funded by the University of Malaya Research Grant (Grant Number: FR134/2007A).

References

1. Robotin MC. Hepatitis B prevalence and control: lessons from the East and the West. World J Hepatol. 2011;3:31-37.

2. Lavanchy D. Chronic viral hepatitis as a public health issue in the world. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22:991-1008.

3. Nguyen VT. Hepatitis B infection in Vietnam. Current issues and future challenges [published online ahead of print December 15, 2010]. Asia Pac J Public Health. doi:10.1177/1010539510385220.

4. Tan TC, Valdivale M, Ong CN. Prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen and antibody among health care employees in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia, 1989. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1992-1993;6:134-139.

5. Lok SF, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatology. 2009;50:661-662.6. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of

chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2009;50:227-242.7. Liaw YF, Leung N, Kao JH, et al; for the Chronic Hepatitis B Guideline Working Party of the Asian-

Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver. Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2008 update. Hepatol Int. 2008;3:263-283.

8. Chen CJ, Yang HI, Su J, et al; for REVEAL-HBV Study Group. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level. JAMA. 2006;295:65-73.

9. Iloeje UH, Yang HI, Su J, Jen CL, You SL, Chen CJ. Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B viral load. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:678-686.

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from

40 Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 25(1)

10. Liaw YF, Sung JJY, Chow WC, et al; for the Cirrhosis Asian Lamivudine Multicentre Study Group. Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;351: 1521-1531.

11. Yuen MF, Yuan HJ, Wong DKH, et al. Prognostic determinants for chronic hepatitis B in Asians: thera-peutic implications. Gut. 2005;54:1610-1614.

12. Wai CT, Mak B, Chua W, Lim SG. The majority of hepatitis B carriers are not on regular surveillance in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2004;45:423-426.

13. Tan NC, Cheah SL, Teo EK. A qualitative study of health-seeking behavior of hepatitis B carriers. Sinagpore Med J. 2005;46:6-10.

14. Tan NC, Cheah SL. What barriers do primary care physicians face in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in primary care? Singapore Med J. 2005;46:333-339.

15. Spiegel B, Bolus R, Han S, et al. Development and validation of a disease targeted quality of life instru-ment in chronic hepatitis B: the hepatitis B quality of life instrument, version 1.0. Hepatology. 2007;46: 113-121.

16. Lam ET, Lam CL, Lai CL, Yuen MF, Fong DY, So TM. Health-related quality of life of southern Chinese with chronic hepatitis B infection. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:52. http://www.hqlo .com/content/7/1/52. Accessed March 23, 2011.

17. Lin YS, Chang TE, So KS. Stopping a silent killer in the underserved Asian and Pacific Islander community: a chronic hepatitis B and liver cancer prevention clinic by medical students. Asia Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10:383-386.

18. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358:483-488.19. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;

320:114-116.20. Hutton J, Walker LG, Gilbert FJ, et al. Psychological impact and acceptability using magnetic resonance

imaging and x-ray mammography: the MARIBS study. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:578-586.21. VandeKieft G. Breaking bad news. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64:1975-1978.22. Butler C, Rollnick S, Stott N. The practitioner, the patient and resistance to change: recent ideas on

compliance. CMAJ. 1996;154:1357-1362.

at Universiti Malaya (S141/J/2004) on June 4, 2013aph.sagepub.comDownloaded from