UA Integrated System: A Case Study
Transcript of UA Integrated System: A Case Study
1
CHAPTER 1THE PROBLEM AND ITS ENVIRONMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
The University of the Assumption, a Catholic Archdiocesan
University, was founded on January 12, 1963, when the bishop of
San Fernando, Most Rev. Emilio A. Cinense, D.D., assisted by
Msgr. Pedro D. Puno, the Vicar General, concretized his dream of
providing Christian education to the young men and women of
Pampanga. Assumption Junior College as it was first named was
shaped by Catholic Christin values of piety, love and respect for
each individual, a belief that education to be holistic,
meaningful and useful in everyday life – leading learners to
achieve personal and spiritual growth and professional
advancement with strong commitment to service.
Assumption Junior College was housed on the 3rd floor of the
Assumpta Building in the city proper of San Fernando and was
managed by Sr. Gunfrida Schneyer, O.S.B., also then, the Superior
of the Community of Missionary Benedictine Sisters of Tutzing
(Germany). The initial program offerings with total enrollees of
275 were Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Science in Commerce,
Bachelor of Science in Education, and Bachelor of Science in
Elementary Education.
Expansion and Reorganization
2
The campus was transferred to its present location at the
University Site Subdivision in 1965. The Msgr. Pedro Puno
Building was then the only edifice in the campus. In the same
year, the institution was granted government recognition as
Assumption College of Pampanga.
The reorganization in 1966 made Rev. Fr. Anicieto M. Franco,
the Rector. He also later organized the High School and Grade
School. Sr. Mary Philip Ryan, O.P. and the Dominican Sisters of
Our Lady of Remedies assisted in the operation and supervision of
both schools.
In 1969, Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering was added
to the roster of programs offered. It was during Rev. Fr.
Franco’s incumbency when the Ryan Building, the Benedictine
Building and the Archbishop Emilio Cinense Gymnasium were built.
In 1974, Archbishop Emilio Cinense appointed Rev. Fr.
Octavio M. Ramos as the first president of the College. His
incumbency worked for the recognition of additional courses,
namely: Bachelor of Science in Nursing, Bachelor of Science in
Nutrition and Dietetics, Bachelor of Science in Industrial
Engineering and Bachelor of Science in Architecture. The Graduate
School was also organized with Master in Business Administration
as the first graduate program.
From College to University
Under the educational leadership of Rev. Fr. Ramos, the
College was granted University status on March 29, 1980 by the
3
Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports. From thence, the
school has been named University of the Assumption.
Soon after its rise into a university, enrollment increased
and thus new buildings were added to accommodate the increasing
population. During such period, new edifices were constructed:
the Nutrition Building, the Grade School Building (now known as
Msgr. Octavio M. Ramos Building), the Bishop Cesar Ma. Guerero
Building (which houses the University Chapel, the Archbishop Cruz
Museum Archives and the Multipurpose Hall), the Ryan Building,
the Msgr. Pedro Puno Building, the Alumni Building, and the Post
Office.
Opening its arms wider in service to the community, the
University launched the Outreach Ministry Program.
Coincidentally, the University was chosen as the Regional Staff
Development Center, the Nutrition Center, the decentralized
Learning Resource Center, and the Educational Development Project
Implementing Task Force, all for Region III. These made the
University even more immersed in community service.
Further Expansion
In 1986, Rev. Fr. Cenovio M. Lumanog, Ph.D., was appointed
President by Archbishop Oscar V. Cruz, J.C.D., D.D. During his
term, on June 13, 1988, the Department of Education, Culture and
Sports granted the University the permit to offer Doctor of
Education.
4
In 1990, the Most Rev. Jesus C. Galang, D.D., the Auxiliary
Bishop of San Fernando, was instilled as the President by
Archbishop Paciano B. Anicieto, D.D. During Bishop Galang’s
incumbency, the Archbishop Cruz Building and the Library Building
(now Most Rev. Jesus C. Galang Building) were constructed.
Likewise, a new program, Bachelor of Science in Accountancy, was
offered.
In 1992, Rev. Msgr. Ricardo Jesus T. Serrano, S.L.D. assumed
presidency. From then to June 2007, Msgr. Serrano has instituted
anti-lahar and anti-flood projects. Moreover, Master in Public
Administration, Bachelor of Science in Hotel and Restaurant
Management, Bachelor of Arts major in Social Work and in
Philosophy, Bachelor of Science in Commerce major in Computer
Science, and Master of Arts in Education majors in Early
Childhood, in Mathematics, in English, and in Teaching Filipino
were added to the program offerings.
In 1998, Mass Communication, and Interior Design were added
as among the majors in Liberal Arts. In the same year, the
Commission on Higher Education (CHED) granted the University the
permission to convert AB major in Social Work to Bachelor of
Science in Social Work.
Under the direction of Msgr. Serrano, the Grade School
Building was reconstructed into three-story and was expanded to
include three wings, namely, Msgr. Cenovio Lumanog Building,
Msgr. Octavio Ramos Building, and the Fr. Anicieto Franco
Building. To accommodate the growing population in the college,
5
rooms in the Archdiocese of San Fernando Building (ASF) and the
Diocese of San Fernando Building (DSF) were occupied to house the
computer laboratories, typing and lecture rooms. A tennis court
with a mini clubhouse was also added to the sports and athletics
facilities.
Two additional Audio-Visual Rooms and the Internet Center
were also put up under his administration. The Archbishop Cinense
Gymnasium was also renovated. The Multi-Purpose Hall was
transferred to the Archbishop Paciano Anicieto Building third
floor. The Domus Mariae International Center (UA Hotel), the new
High School Building (now known as Msgr. Ricardo Serrano
Building), computer rooms and multimedia classrooms, the UA
Façade, the UA Radio Studio, UA TV Studio, Speech Laboratory, and
the Student Center in the Archbishop Paciano Anicieto Building
were also constructed during this time.
While the University’s continuing quest for excellence, it
worked dedicatedly towards its attainment of membership to the
Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges and
Universities (PAASCU). Its efforts gained initial fruition in
1998 for Level 1 Accreditation. In 2002, the Liberal Arts,
Education, Commerce, Accountancy and Nursing programs, as well as
the Grade School and High School programs, were awarded Level 2
Accreditation.
In July 2007, momentous changes in the history of the
University of the Assumption took place. Most Rev. Roberto C.
Mallari, D.D. auxiliary Bishop of San Fernando, was installed as
6
the fifth President on November 29, 2007. His governance being
founded on the gospel values of peace, unity, and love, Bishop
Mallari had concretely strengthened the foundations of community
building, restoring the trust and confidence of the employees,
making every member feel valuable and worthy of God’s bountiful
blessings.
In May 2008, the School of Arts and Sciences, College of
Education, College of Business Administration, and Nursing
programs achieved PAASCU Level 2 Re-Accreditation. Cognizant with
the University Vision, Mission and Goals, the College of
International and Hospitality Management offered as new program,
Bachelor of Science in Tourism Management upon the opening of
academic year 2009-2010. In July 2009, Wireless Mesh Internet
access was made accessible to the UA Community. On August 4, 2009
Feast of St. John Mary Vianney was the ground breaking ceremony
of the St. Thomas Aquinas Students’ Courtyard and on August 24,
2009 was the time capsule laying for the UA Main Entrance and
Lobby. These two infrastructure projects were completed on
August, 2010 during the Feast of Our Lady of the Assumption. The
Robotics Laboratory was constructed and the Human Patient
Simulator was acquired on August 5, 2010 for the Nursing Arts
Laboratory in line with our commitment to provide quality
education to our students. Faithful to its goal as formator of
Catholic Leaders, two of its offices which are directly
responsible in the formation of the Assumption community were
merged to form the Office of the Assumption Mission. This office
7
is responsible in promoting the mission and core values of the
University to all the members of the UA Community.
With all the improvements that had happen in the university,
as increase in population of the students is also evident. Here
in the University of the Assumption, a roughly estimated 3,000
students from grade school to college comprise the studentry.
With the number of students the University of the Assumption has,
imagine the hassle it encounters during enrollment period.
The University of the Assumption now with its computerized
system, named University of the Assumption Integrated System,
helps in easing the hectic procedures in payment, encoding of
grades and enrollment system. With the computerized system used
by the University of the Assumption, is it really beneficial for
the university?
II. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The main objective of the study is to assess the
computerized system used by the University of the Assumption and
to determine the opinions and views of the faculty and staff who
are using the said system. The researchers will justify the
following questions:
1. How does the system work and in what aspect is it
used?
2. Is the computerized system effective?
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the
system?
8
4. What are the problems encountered in using the
system and the solutions to those problems?
5. What is the over-all rating of the performance of
the system?
III. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
This is a very important topic for the researchers.
It gives information of the functionality of the
computerized system being used by the University of the
Assumption.
It justifies mind-boggling questions in the mind of the
researchers as to whether the system used is beneficial or not.
With the help of this case study, the opinion and views of
the respondents about the advantages and disadvantages of the
system as well as their recommendations on how the system can be
improved.
Therefore, the readers will be knowledgeable of the system
and the benefits it can give to the University of the Assumption.
IV. SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS
This case study focuses on knowing the functionality and
effectiveness of the system, the advantages and disadvantages of
the system, the problems encountered and the solutions to the
problems and the over-all rating of the performance of the
system.
9
This study is confined on the opinions of the faculty and
staff of the University of the Assumption.
Researchers believe that this is the right time to conduct
the study because of the negative feedback given by some
employees and staff especially the teachers regarding the
functionality of the system.
CHAPTER 2
DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
I. METHODOLOGY
This study is based on a descriptive-analytic method. It
attempts to assess the computerized system used by the University
of the Assumption and to determine the opinions and views of the
faculty and staff who are using the said system.
II. RESPONDENTS
The respondents selected for this study are fifteen faculty
and staff coming from different departments of the University of
the Assumption.
III. RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
10
This study is conducted through surveys. The researchers
prepared survey questionnaires which aims to gather data to know
the views and opinions of faculty and staff about the matter.
Researchers also conducted an interview to a personnel of
the CITL of the University of the Assumption regarding the
functionality and technical aspects of the system.
IV. TREATMENT OF DATA
Because this case study is just a preliminary study and is
not a requirement to obtain a degree such as thesis and
dissertation, no attempt was made to assess the data in this
study with high and complex statistical methods. The number or
percentage of those who answered each option of each item in the
questionnaire was the only ones assessed by the researchers.
Therefore, to get the tally and the percentage are the only ones
required.
11
CHAPTER 3
PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
The following data and information are findings from the
research:
12
The distribution of respondents according to gender is
assessed. Out of fifteen (15) respondents, five (5) are male and
ten (10) are female. See the graph below:
All respondents are familiar and had use the University of
the Assumption Integrated System. See the graph below:
FEMALE MALE 024681012
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS
ACCORDING TO GENDER
YES
NO
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS
ON THEIR FAMILIARITY WITH UAIS
13
According to the respondents, thirteen (13) of them said
that the system was effective, one (1) said it is not effective
and one (1) said it is effective at time. See the graph below:
YES NO AT TIMES0
4
8
12
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS ON THEIR
BELIEF OF THE EFFECTIVITY OF THE SYSTEM
14
of all the respondents, only one (1) gave a rating of
perfect 10 for the system while two (2) respondents gave 5 as a
rating, one (1) gave 6 as a rating, six (6) respondents gave a
rating of 7, four (4) respondents gave a rating of 8 and one (1)
gave 9 as a rating. See the graph below:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1002468
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS
ON THEIR RATING OF THE SYSTEM
RATING: 10 AS HIGHESTNUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
15
The respondents also listed the advantages of the system
which are as follows:
Ease of use
Faster transactions
Security
Retrieval and storage of records
The disadvantages or problems of the system were also
enumerated by the respondents. They are as follows:
Posted grades cannot be changed
No automatic computation of the average of grades
No auto save feature
Cannot be accessed outside the school
Costly
Electricity dependent
Network dependent
If server is down, you cannot access the system
Not web based
16
CHAPTER 4
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
I. SUMMARY
This research is an attempt to assess the computerized
system used by the University of the Assumption and to determine
the opinions and views of the faculty and staff who are using the
said system.
Using the descriptive-analytic method, the researcher
designed a survey questionnaire answered by fifteen (15) random
respondents from the different department of the university.
II. CONCLUSION
The University of the Assumption Integrated System was
created some time in the year 2010 by Engr. Jaramillo, a Dean of
the University of the East.
17
The system works such that prospective freshmen will file an
application by way of admission and they will be encoded in the
system. Those who have passed the entrance are eligible for
enrollment.
The system provides the storing of needed information in a
faster, more convenient way by storing file of the student
enrollees in a computer system that will lessen the effort of
faculty staff in storing files of each student every now and
then.
The system also serves as information especially for the
irregular students, freshmen, transferees and professor to be
able to access in course, subject, and professor and student
enrollees. It is also designed for the staffs and other
authorized personnel in the college office to enable them to
easily produce information required. With the help of this
system, tedious work of manual record keeping is eliminated. It
also reduces human errors and processing time, thus it can boost
productivity which may result to high quality results or services
rendered. With the well-integrated processes that can perform
much faster and more accurate transactions compared to a manual
system, the University of the Assumption Integrated System is
beneficial to the institution.
There are always a downside in everything. One major
disadvantage of this system is that in case of system error or
system breakdown, the operation will be paralyzed. There are also
several problems system users encounter. These problems includes:
18
data are no automatically saved, errors once posted cannot be
corrected, it’s tedious and it cannot be accessed outside the
school.
With these problems being encountered, the CITL (formerly
known as ITC Department) is responsible for the database
management, maintenance, system development/modification as well
as the network infrastructure. To ensure a functioning system,
the CITL checks the server periodically. A daily back up is also
implemented for easy data retrieval in case of unavoidable
circumstances.
The over-all rating for the system for both the interviewee
and the respondents is an average of 7.31.
III. RECOMMENDATION
Based from the information gathered and conclusion, the
researchers are recommending the following:
a. To the system developer, it would be better to add
system upgrades to improve the performance of the
said system. Some system upgrades would be: simplify
the system, add a column for the tentative final
grade, auto save functionality, when encoding grades
the enter button should also be used as tab,
accessible anywhere, modification of records
especially grades should be possible, apply a
distributed database and make it web based.
19
b. To the faculty and staff, especially those who are
using the system, widen your patience and
understanding in using the system. Developing a
system is very hard and requires a lot of work and
of course, time. We need to understand that no
system is perfect. It always has it downfall.
c. To the school administrators, show support in all
the computerized systems the institution is using.
d. To the future researchers, continue to analyze and
assess different computerized systems to help the
system developers identify their mistakes and
eventually create a solution.
20
APPENDIX
A. INTERVIEW QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
1. What is the name of the system?
Enrollment System
2. When was the system created?
It was created some time in year 2010.
3. Who created the system?
Engr. Jaramillo Dean of the University of the East is
the one who created the system.
4. How does the system work?
Prospective freshmen will file an application by way of
admission and they will be encoded in the system. Those
who have passed the entrance exam are eligible for
enrollment.
5. In what aspect is the system used?
21
An enrollment system is also serves as information
especially for the irregular students, freshmen,
transferee, and professors to be able to access the
course, subject, professor and the student enrollees.
It is also designed for use by staff and other
authorized user in the college office to enable them to
easily produce information required by different people
in the college.
6. Is the system effective?
It is effective in the way that tedious work of manual
record keeping is eliminated. Enrollment system provide
the needs for storing information in a faster,
efficient, and more convenient way.
7. What are the advantages of the system?
It reduces human error and processing time. Thus, it
can boost the productivity which can lead to high
quality services. This can result in a system with
well-integrated processes that can perform much faster
and more accurate than a manual system.
8. What are the disadvantages of the system?
22
In case of a system error or server breakdown, the
operation will be paralyzed.
9. What are the problems encountered in the system?
Mostly user problems but no major problems so far.
10. How do you intend to solve the problems
encountered on the system?
By training the end users
11. Who are responsible in maintaining the system?
CITL (formerly known as ITC Department) is responsible
for the database management, maintenance, system
development or modification as well as for the network
infrastructure.
12. How is the system being maintained?
The server is checked periodically to ensure that it is
working properly. A daily back up is being implemented
for easy retrieval of data in case of unavoidable
circumstances.
13. On a scale of 1 – 10, 10 being the highest, how do
you rate the over-all performance of the system?
8
23
B. SAMPLE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Is the system effective?
_____YES _____NO _____AT TIMES
What are the advantages of the system?
24
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
________________________
What are disadvantages of the system?
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
________________________
What are the problems you encountered while using the
system?
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
________________________
What are your recommendations to improve the system being
used?
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
________________________
On a scale of 1 – 10, 10 being the highest, how would you
rate the overall performance of the system? ________________