THEORETICAL STUDY OF NUCLEOPHILIC BEHAVIOUR OF 3,4-DIOXA-7-THIACYCLOPENTA[ A]PENTALENE AND...
Transcript of THEORETICAL STUDY OF NUCLEOPHILIC BEHAVIOUR OF 3,4-DIOXA-7-THIACYCLOPENTA[ A]PENTALENE AND...
International Journal of Chemical Modeling ISSN: 1941-3955 Volume 4, Number 1 © 2012 Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
THEORETICAL STUDY OF NUCLEOPHILIC
BEHAVIOUR OF 3,4-DIOXA-7-THIA-CYCLOPENTA[A]PENTALENE AND 3,7-DIOXA-4-
THIA-CYCLOPENTA[A]PENTALENE USING AB INTIO
AND DFT BASED REACTIVITY DESCRIPTORS
Banjo Semire and Olusegun Ayobami Odunola Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology,
Ogbomoso, Nigeria
ABSTRACT
Calculations of HF/6-31G* and DFT-B3LYP/6-31G* based reactivity descriptors are reported for Furan (1), thiophene (2), thieno[3,2-b]furan (3) and the isomeric 3,4-Dioxa-7-thia-cyclopenta[a]pentalene (4) and 3,7-Dioxa-4-thia-cyclopenta[a]pentalene (5) in order to get insight into the factors determining the nature of their interactions with electrophiles. Global reactivity descriptors such as ionization energy, molecular hardness, electrophilicity, frontier molecular orbital energies and shapes, total energies were determined and used to identify the differences in the stability and reactivity of 3,4-Dioxa-7-thia-cyclopenta[a]pentalene and 3,7-Dioxa-4-thia-cyclopenta[a]pentalene. Additionally, Mulliken charge, local ionization energy and electrostatic potential energy surfaces revealed structural differences of isomeric these heterocycles. Calculated values led to the conclusion that heterocyclic 3,4-Dioxa-7-thia-cyclopenta[a]pentalene was more aromatic and stable than its isomeric 3,7-Dioxa-4-thia-cyclopenta[a]pentalene. Theoretical results showed exceptional reactivity of C(2),C(2*) atom for 4 and C(1*) atom for 5.
INTRODUCTION
Diels-Alder reaction (D-A) is one of the most widely used synthetic strategies for the synthesis of natural products due to its character of generating cyclic systems. By this reaction cyclic compounds characteristic of some families of alkaloids may be directly developed and synthesized (Biolatto et al, 1999 and Della Rosa et al, 2004). The use of
Corresponding e-mail: [email protected]
Banjo Semire and Olusegun Ayobami Odunola 88
aromatic compounds as dienes has been widely studied in D-A reactions, however, the use of
them as dienophiles is a new and interesting branch that allows to state large and versatile
synthetic sequences.
Moreover, nowadays, computational chemistry methods offer a unique ability for organic
chemists to generate optimal geometry structures, the structural and electronic properties of
reactants and products make decisions as to which of the chemical transformations will occur
in reactions.
From the theoretical point, the differences in the stability of heterocycles are explained in
terms of aromaticity and delocalization of electron densities on π molecular orbitals. For the
stable compounds, a high π molecular orbital delocalization established between two aromatic
rings, which may not be presented in the less stable isomers.
It is evident that the aromaticity correlates with the thermodynamic stability of a system,
and also there is relationship between hardness and stability. Parr and Pearson (Zhou and
Navangul, 1990; Chamizo et al, 1993; and Bird, 1997) reported the principle of maximum
hardness (absolute hardness) η. For an N-electron system with total energy E and η are
defined as;
)(2
1)(
)(2
2
AIN
Erv
(1)
In the formula I is the vertical ionization energy and A stands for the vertical electron
affinity. According to the Koopmans theorem (1933), the hardness corresponds to the gap
between the HOMO and LUMO orbitals:
LUMOHOMOEAEI ,
(2)
Hence, the principle of maximum hardness confirms the results that show that stability of
aromatic hydrocarbons depends on HOMO-LUMO energy gap. The larger the HOMO-
LUMO energy gap the harder molecule. The higher HOMO energy corresponds to the more
reactive molecule in the reactions with electrophiles.
The electron affinity can also be used in combination with ionization energy to
give electronic chemical potential μ defined by Parr and Pearson (Pearson, 1993) as the
characteristic of electronegativity of molecules:
)(2
1
2
1)(
)( LUMOHOMOrvEEAI
N
E
(3)
The global electrophility index ω was introduced by Parr et al (1999) and calculated
using the electronic chemical potential μ and chemical hardness η.
2
2
(4)
Theoretical Study of Nucleophilic Behaviour ... 89
According to the definition this index measures the propensity of a species to accept
electrons. As Domingo et al (2002) proposes the high nucleophility and electrophility of
heterocycles corresponds to opposite extremes of the scale of global reactivity indexes. A
good, more reactive, nucleophile is characterized by a lower value of μ, ω and in opposite a
good electrophile is characterized by a high value of μ, ω.
The use of molecular surfaces, based on the molecular electron density such as the
molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) (Politzer and Truhlar, 19981; Ehresmann, 2003) has a
long tradition in the qualitative interpretation of chemical reactivity. The molecular
electrostatic potential gives a powerful description of molecular properties, such as strong
non-covalent interactions, that are predominantly electrostatic in nature. However, much
classical chemical reactivity depends on electron donor–acceptor interactions that are not
encoded in the MEP. The absolute reactivity can be judged from the values of the local
ionization energy at the π-surface of the aromatic compound.
Here we would study the electrophilic substitution reactions with Furan (1), Thiophene
(2), Theno[3,2-b]furan (3), 3,4-Dioxa-7-thia-cyclopenta[a]pentalene (4) and 3,7-Dioxa-4-thia-
cyclopenta[a]pentalene (5) using computational chemistry methods.
Our goal is to analyze aromaticity of the molecules 3, 4 and 5 (figure 1), and to explain
their stability, relative reactivity using molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) and local
ionization energy surfaces. For this purpose, DFT and ab-initio calculations would be
performed on these molecules. In terms of molecular surfaces based on electron density it is
possible to explain the aromatic behavior of these compounds. Optimized structures, atomic
charges, HOMO-LUMO gaps, global hardness, electronegativity index are also reported to
explain the behavior of these systems. The purpose of our work was to find reactivity
descriptors that explains and predicts the reactivity of these molecules and compare their
reactivity with that of furan and thiophene.
Figure 1. Studied molecules.
Geometry optimizations for compounds 1-5 (figure 1) were performed at both HF and
DFT level. The geometries 1-5 were fully optimized at the DFT B3LYP level of theory with a
6-31G* basis set.
Banjo Semire and Olusegun Ayobami Odunola 90
The basis set 6-31G* was used for all atoms in ab initio methods, this has been used by
several researchers in studying heterocycles (Romina et al, 2007; Bouzzine et al,2005;
Bouzzine et al, 2009; Armelin et al, 2009; De Olivera et al, 2004; Dkhissi et al, 2002 and
Amazonas et al, 2006). The images of MEP and ionization potential surfaces were obtained,
harmonic vibrational frequencies are positive. All calculations were performed using Spartan
06.
The stability and reactivity descriptors: total energy E, ionization energy I, absolute
hardness η, electrophilicity index ω, frontier molecular orbital energy gap ΔH-L of isomeric
heterocycles 1-5 calculated at the HF/6-31G* and DFT B3LYP 6-31G* levels of theory are
shown in the Table 1.
As shown in Table 1, the hardness and HOMO-LUMO gap as a characteristic of
reactivity shows that heterocycle 3 is expected to be more reactive than furan (1) and
thiophene (2) but less reactive than 4 and 5.
However, 5 would exhibit higher degree of reactivity and antiaromatic behavior in the
electrophilic reactions as compared to 4. The reactivity of the molecules studied are correlated
with the number of rings when thiophene is not included, there is an increase in electrophilic
character of the molecule with increase in number of rings (Figure 2).
The computed E for HF/6-31G* and DFT B3LYP 6-31G* methods shows that isomer 4
is more stable system than isomer 5.
The energy difference between isomers 4 and 5 is 4.58 Kcal/mol for B3LYP/6-31G*
calculation, and 6.15Kcal/mol for HF/6-31G* calculation (Figure 3 and 4).
The calculated values of global electrophilicity index ω show the nucleophility power of
heterocycles 1-5.
The ω values calculated with HF/6-31G* show that thiophene (2) has highest
electrophilic character but DFT results show that 4 and 5 are more electrophiles than 2. The
obtained ω values for 4 and 5 isomers are similar.
However, since heterocycle 4 exhibits a lower ω value of 0.17 eV (DFT) and 0.43 eV
(HF/6-31G*) as compared to 5, one could expect better propensity of 4 to be involved in the
reactions with electrophiles than for heterocycle 5 (Table 1).
Table 1. Global properties of heterocycles 1-5; μ, η, Δ H-L - frontier molecular orbital
energy gap calculated at HF/6-31G* and DFT-B3LYP/6-31G* (bracket) in eV
Compound HOMO LUMO Δ H-L Μ η ω
1 -8.66
(-6.11)
4.88
(0.54)
13.56
(6.65)
-1.89
(-2.79)
6.77
(3.33)
0.26
(1.17)
2 -8.94
(-6.34)
3.75
(-0.21)
12.69
(6.13)
-2.60
(-3.28)
6.35
(3.06)
0.53
(1.75)
3 -8.08
(- 5.23)
3.47
(-0.43)
11.55
(4.80)
-2.31
(-2.83)
5.78
(2.40)
0.46
(1.67)
4 -7.60
(-5.40)
3.28
(-0.57)
10.88
(4.83)
-2.16
(-2.99)
5.44
(2.42)
0.43
(1.84)
5 -7.52
( -5.36)
3.05
(-0.74)
10.57
(4.62)
-2.24
(-3.05)
5.29
(2.31)
0.47
(2.02)
Theoretical Study of Nucleophilic Behaviour ... 91
Figure 2. Relationship between number of rings in the molecule and electrophilicity index.
Figure 3. Calculated energy (Kcal/mol), dipole moment (Debye) and electrostatic potential
surfaces on the molecular surfaces of heterocycles 4 and 5 with HF/6-31G*. Color ranges, in
kJ/mol: from red -113.37 to blue +134.23 for 4 and from red -108.47 to blue +134.82 for 5.
Both DFT and Hartree Fock (HF) have been used to estimate the ionization energy I(r)
and molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) energy surfaces of heterocycles 4 and 5. The
visualized results of MEP energy and I(r) surfaces are shown in Figures 2, 3, 4.
Banjo Semire and Olusegun Ayobami Odunola 92
Figure 4. Calculated energy (Kcal/mol), dipole moment (Debye) and electrostatic potential
surfaces on the molecular surfaces of heterocycles 4 and 5 with BLY3P/6-31G*. Color ranges, in
kJ/mol: from red -196.06 to blue +118.66 for 4 and from red -93.26 to blue +116.48 for 5.
The presented MEP surface, an overlaying of the electrostatic potential (the attraction or
repulsion of a positive charge for a molecule) is valuable for describing overall molecular
charge distribution as well as anticipating sites of electrophilic addition. The red color
represent negatively charged areas of surface (i.e. those areas where accepting an electrophile
is most favorable). Another indicator of electrophilic attraction is provided by the local
ionization potential energy surface, an overlaying of the energy of electron removal
(ionization) onto the electron density. The regions with red color represent regions in the
molecular surface where electron removal goes (with minimal energy) most easily.
The difference in reactivity of heterocycles 4 and 5 can be judged from the values of
electrostatic potential and local ionization energy surfaces presented in Figures 4, 5.
For heterocycle 4 the lowest local ionization energy values and negatively charged
electrostatic potential values are found on the C(1)=C(2) and C(1*)=C(2*) bonds and
delocalization of π–electron on thiophene ring spreading over C(1)=C(2) and C(1*)=C(2*)
bonds of furan rings, therefore 4 is more stabilized and aromatic by thiophene ring at the
middle of the heterocycle. This suggests that molecule 4 would involve in the electrophilic
substitution via addition-elimination mechanism.
Theoretical Study of Nucleophilic Behaviour ... 93
Figure 5. Calculated local ionization energy surfaces on the molecular surfaces of heterocycles 4
and 5 with B3LYP/6-31G*. Color ranges, in kJ/mol: from red 8.37 to blue 16.14 for 4 and from
red 8.62 to blue 15.48 for 5.
On the contrary the electrostatic potential and local ionization energy surfaces for
heterocycle 5 shows delocalized π–electron surface on thiophene rings and also localized
charge on C(2) of furan ring. This result suggests the presumable possibility of aromatic
electrophilic substitution mechanism reactions of heterocycle 5 on C(1*)=C(2*) of thiophene
ring and addition-elimination reaction mechanism at position C(2).
The frontier molecular orbital pictures of the both molecules 4 and 5 are shown in Figure
6. Only the HOMO, HOMO-1 and LUMO are presented in this work. The energy difference
between the HOMO and HOMO-1 for 4 is smaller than for 5 by 0.23 eV. For the heterocycles
4 and 5 the π molecular orbital localization exists between furan and thiophene rings
accordingly as shown in HOMO shapes. For both molecules, the greatest extension value of
HOMO is observed on C(1) and C(1*) atoms. Moreover for 4 the HOMO-1 is delocalized on
C(2)-CS=C(3)-C(3*)=CS-C(2*) bonds with largest value on C(3)-C(3*) bond while for 5 the
HOMO-1 shape is majorly delocalized on C(3)-C(3*)=CS-C(2*) bonds.
With this molecular orbital analysis the relative reactivity can be explained, the π
molecular orbital delocalization agrees well with the reactivity behavior of heterocyclic rings.
The greatest extension value of HOMO shape on C(1) and C(1*) atoms suggest exceptional
reactivity of this atoms (because of the symmetrical nature of the molecules) in the
electrophilic reactions.
Banjo Semire and Olusegun Ayobami Odunola 94
Figure 6. HOMO, HOMO-1, LUMO orbitals for heterocycles 1 and 2 calculated using B3LYP/ 6-
31G*.
Mulliken charge population at HF/6-311G* and DFT B3LYP 6-311G* levels show very
similar reactivity descriptor values considering reactivity tendencies.
The two methods used in the present work (DFT and HF) for calculation of Mulliken
charge population lead to the same qualitatively and quantitatively similar description of the
chemistry and reactivity of the heterocycles 4 and 5. The negative charge increase in
molecule represents the attraction of relevant sites of molecule in reactions with electrophiles.
The highest negative charge located on C(2),C(2*) atom of heterocycle 4, so Mulliken
charges calculated at both HF and DFT for 4 suggest that electrophilic reaction could occur
with this carbon atom. For heterocycle 5, the highest negative charges are on C(2), C(1*) and
C(2*). This suggests that electrophilic reaction could occur with these carbon atoms, however
the most probable atom for electrophilic reaction is C(1*) in molecule 5 (Table 2). These are
in agreement with analysis of MEP, I(r) and HOMO shapes.
Table 2. Mulliken charges on selected atoms of heterocycles 4 and 5 calculated with
HF/6-31G* and B3LYP/6-31G*
Atom Heterocycle 4 Heterocycle 5
HF/6-31G* B3LYP/6-31G* HF/6-31G* B3LYP/6-31G*
C(1),C(1*)
C(2),C(2*)
-0.116
-0.263
0.088
-0.209
0.102, -0.435
-0.256, -0.150
0.059, -0.371
-0.192, -0.105
Theoretical Study of Nucleophilic Behaviour ... 95
CONCLUSION
A theoretical study of the stability and reactivity was carried out at the density functional
theory and ab-initio calculation level for the structures of furan, thiophene, thieno[3,2-
b]furan, 3,4-Dioxa-7-thia-cyclopenta[a]pentalene and 3,7-Dioxa-4-thia-cyclopenta[a]
pentalene. Global descriptors such as chemical potential (μ), molecular hardness (η),
electrophilicity (ω), frontier molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) energy gap, local ionization
energy and electrostatic potential energy surfaces were determined and used to identify the
differences in the reactivity of heterocycles.
The hardness and HOMO-LUMO gap as a characteristic of reactivity shows that
heterocycle 3 is expected to be more reactive than furan (1) and thiophene (2) but less
reactive than 4 and 5. However, 5 would exhibit higher degree of reactivity and antiaromatic
behavior in the electrophilic reactions as compared to 4.
REFERENCES
Amazonas, J. G.; Guimaraes, J. R.; Santos Costa, S. C.; Laks, B.; Del Nero, J.; Theoretical
modeling of low band-gap organic oligomers, J. Mol. Struct. [THEOCHEM] 2006, 759,
87–91.
Armelin, E., Bertran, O., Estrany, F., Salvatella, R and Alemán, C. Characterization and
properties of a polythiophene. Euro Polymer J. 2009, 45, 2211-2221.
Biolatto, B.; Kneeteman, M.; Mancini P. Diels-Alder reactions of N-tosyl-3-nitroindole and
dienamides: Diels-Alder reactions of N-tosyl-3-nitroindole and dienamides: synthesis of
intermediates of Aspidospermine alkaloids. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3343-3446.
Bird, C.W. Heteroaromaticity. 10. The Direct Calculation of Resonance Energies of Azines
and Azoles from Molecular Dimensions. Tetrahedron. 1997, 53, 2497-2501.
Bouzzine, S. M. Hamidia, M and Bouachrine M. DFT study of bridged oligo(bithiophene)s.
Conformational analysis and opto-electronic properties Orbital. 2009, 1, 203-210.
Bouzzine, S.M., Bouzakraoui, S., Bouachrine, M and Hamidi. M. Density functional theory
(B3LYP/6-31G*) study of oligothiophenes in their aromatic and polaronic states, J. Mol.
Struct. [THEOCHEM] 2005, 726, 271-276.
Brasca, R.; Kneeteman, M. N.; Pedro M.E. Calculation of electronic properties of aromatic
dienophiles for reactivity prediction in diels-alder reactions, IDECEFYN. 2007, 12, 54-57
Chamizo, J. A.; Morgado, J.; Sosa, O. Organometallic Aromaticity, Organometalliks. 1993,
12, 5005-5007.
De Olivera, M.A., De Almeida, W.B and Dos Santon, H.F. Structure and electronic properties
of alkylthiophenes coupled by Head-to-Tail and Head-to-Head regioselectivity J. Braz.
CHem. Soc. 2004, 15, 832-839.
Della Rosa, C.; Paredes, E.; Kneeteman, M. N.; Mancini, P. M. E. 2-Nitrofurans as
dienophiles in Diels-Alder reactions. 8th International Electronic Conference on
Synthetic Organic Chemistry (ECSOC-8), 2004, A016.
Dkhissi, A.; Belijonne, D.; Lazzaroni, R.; Louwet, F.; Groenendeal, L.; Bredas, J.L. Density
functional theory and Hartree–Fock studies of the geometric and electronic structure of
neutral and doped ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) oligomers, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 2002,
91, 517-523.
Banjo Semire and Olusegun Ayobami Odunola 96
Domingo, L. R.; Aurell, M.; Contreras, M.; Perez, P. Quantitative Characterization of the
Local Electrophilicity of Organic Molecules. Understanding the Regioselectivity on
Diels−Alder Reactions, J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002, 106, 6871-6876.
Ehresmann, B.; Martin, B.; Horn, A. H.C.; Clark, T. Local molecular properties and their use
in predicting reactivity. J. Mol. Model. 2003, 9(5), 342-347.
Koopmans, T. Ordering of wave functions and eigenvalues to the individual electrons of an
atom, Physica. 1934, 1, 104-113.
Parr, R.G.; Szentpaly, L.; Liu, S. Electrophilicity Index, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1922-
1924.
Pearson, R. G. (1993) The principle of maximum hardness, Acc. Chem. Res, 26(5), 250-255.
Politzer, P.; Truhlar, D.G. (eds) Chemical applications of atomic and molecular electrostatic
potentials: Reactivity, structure, scattering, and energies of organic, inorganic, and
biological systems. Plenum, New York (1981).
SPARTAN 06, Wavefunction Inc., Irvine, CA, 92612.
Zhou, Z; Navangul, H. V. Absolute hardness and aromatisity: MNDO study of benzenoid
hydrocarbons, J. Phys. Org. Chem.1990, 3, 784-788.