William & Mary Law Review William & Mary Law Review

Volume 47 (2005-2006) Issue 6 Article 10

April 2006

Table of Cases (v. 47) Table of Cases (v. 47)

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr

Repository Citation Repository Citation

Table of Cases (v. 47), 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2177 (2006), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/

wmlr/vol47/iss6/10

Copyright c 2006 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr

TABLE OF CASES

(Only cases receiving textual discussion are included in this table.)

AA Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a

Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General ............. 2134Abbott Laboratories v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc ........ 380Adamson v. California . ...................... 840,841,891Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody ...........Alden v. M aine ........................Alexandria v. Ashby ....................Antioch Co. v. Scrapbook Borders, Inc ......Apprendi v. New Jersey .................Armendariz v. Foundation Health PsychcareArmstrong v. United States ..............Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition .........Atkins v. Virginia .....................Atlas Powder Co. v. Ireco Inc ............

. ............. 958

. ............ 1346

............. 900

............. 694

. ............. 721Services, Inc. 1774. ............ 1534........ 2130,2140...... 860,893,902............. 384

BBadie v. Bank of America ...........................Bagley, United States v ...........................Baker v. Carr ............ 1070, 1902, 1903, 1906, 1907,

1921, 1924, 1927, 1928, 1930, 1941, 1945, 1950Basic v. Levinson ......................Bell v. United States ...................Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics ...........Blakely v. Washington ..................Blessing v. Freestone ...................Block v. Hirsh.......................Board of Regents v. Roth ................Booker, United States v ................Bowers v. Hardwick ....................Boyle v. United Technologies, Inc ..........Brady v. Maryland ....................Brandenburg v. Ohio ...................

169716091908,,1952

......... 1007

......... 1081

.......... 189

.......... 721

......... 1493

.......... 836

......... 1101

.......... 731

.......... 877

.......... 189

..... 1609,1626

......... 2143

2177

WILLIAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW

Braxton v. Gaines ................................. 1421Broadrick v. Oklahoma ............................. 2160Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc .................... 1646, 1691Brown v. Board of Education .................... 1210, 1914Brown v. United States ........... 769, 772, 780, 781, 895, 900Bruggeman v. Blagojevich ...................... 1501, 1512Bryson v. Shumway ............. 1497, 1502, 1508, 1511, 1512Burger v. New York ................................. 479Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth .................. 1817Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority ............... 1753Bush v. Vera ...................................... 1935Bush v. Gore ........................ 1899, 1902, 1903, 1905

CCapitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette ...... 40Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute ................... 1694Causby, United States v ............................ 1540Caze v. Reilly ...................................... 788Chalmers v. H.M. Advocate ........................... 852Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge ................ 1385Chen v. Bouchard .............................. 393, 398Chisholm v. Georgia ................................ 757Christensen v. Harris County ........................ 1795Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Sandoz, Ltd ....................... 679City of Indianapolis v. Edmond ....................... 500City of Mobile v. Bolden ............................. 1933Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill ............ 1104Coffin v. United States .............................. 826Cohens v. Virginia ............................. 1343, 1345Coker v. Georgia ............................... 855, 892Cole v. Burns International Security Services ........... 1774Colegrove v. Green .............. 1905, 1908, 1921, 1927, 1950Columbian Insurance Co. of Alexandria v. Ashby ..... 785, 897Commonwealth v. Caton ............................ 1219Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. 1775Connecticut v. Teal ................................. 959Continental Can Co. USA v. Monsanto Co ............... 377Cooper v. Commissioner of Income Tax ................ 832

2178 [Vol. 47:2177

INDEX-TABLE OF CASES

County Court of Ulster County v. Allen ................. 2154Cousins v. City Council of Chicago .................... 1938Craig v. Boren ........................... 1985, 1996, 1997Cremin v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc ...... 1761

DDaubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc ............ 951Davis v. Bandemer ....................... 1901, 1907, 1928Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa ................... 912, 925, 933Diamond v. Chakrabarty ............................ 403Doe v. Chiles ....................... 1496, 1502, 1508, 1512Dolan v. City of Tigard ......................... 1516, 1531Dothard v. Rawlinson ........................ 959, 965, 966Dred Scott v. Sandford ................... 754, 792, 793, 794Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc ............................ 534Dudgeon v. United Kingdom .......................... 877Dunlop Holdings Ltd. v. Ram Golf Corp ................. 386

EEdison Electric Light Co. v. Novelty

Incandescent Lamp Co .........................EEOC v. Chicago Miniature Lamp Works .............EEOC v. Joe's Stone Crab ..........................EEOC v. Grief Brothers Corp ........................EEOC v. Knox-Schillinger (In re Trans World Airlines) ..Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co .....Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mayo Foundation for

Medical Education and Research ..................Eli Lilly & Co. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc ...............Enmund v. Florida .......................... 856, 8Evans v. Gore ....................................Everson v. Board of Education ......................

382971977

1829350376

378385

57, 893.. 832... 35

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton ....Federal Election Commission v.

Massachusetts Citizens ........Ferguson v. City of Charleston ....

................... 1817

.................... 325

......... 463,477,479,482

20061 2179

2180 WILLLAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW [Vol. 47:2177

Finnegan v. Trans World Airlines, Inc .................. 973Folger Adam Security Inc. v. DeMatteis /MacGregor ....... 360Franklin Electric Co., United States v .................. 1802FTC v. H.J. Heinz Co .............................. 1793FTC v. Arch Coal, Inc ............................... 1781FTC v. Libbey, Inc ................................ 1797Fuentes v. Shevin .................................. 1751Fuller v. Oregon ................................... 2076Funk Bros. v. Kalo .................................. 404Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters ................... 987

GGanesh v. Computer Learning Centers, Inc .............. 1040Garcia v. Spun Steak Co ............................ 971Geer v. Connecticut ................................. 825Genentech, Inc. v. U.S. International Trade Commission ... 683General Electric Co. v. Gilbert ......................... 924General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co ....... 379Gibbons v. Ogden .......... 1343, 1345, 1378, 1384, 1385, 1389Gideon v. Wainwright .......................... 2048, 2049Gonzaga University v. Doe .......................... 1494Good News Club v. Milford Central School ............... 40Green Tree Financial Corp v. Bazzle .................. 1718Gregg v. Georgia ................................... 855Gregory v. Ashcroft ................................ 1346Griggs v. Duke Power Co ................. 914, 953, 955, 963Griswold v. Connecticut .............................. 869Grutter v. Bollinger ... 1961, 1962, 2011, 2012, 2033, 2034, 2038

HHallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc. v. City of Lake Oswego .... 1580Hamdi v. Rumsfeld ............................ 1066, 1085Hanna v. Plumer ................................... 686Harris v. United States .............................. 735Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins ........................... 924Hill v. Gateway 2000, Inc ............................ 1692Hitzeman v. Rutter ................................. 392Holtzman v. Schlesinger ............................ 1109

INDEX-TABLE OF CASES

Home Builders Ass'n of Central Arizona v.City of Scottsdale ................................ 1573

Hospital Corp. of America v. FTC ..................... 1804Houston v. Moore ......................... 1362, 1379, 1386H ovey v. Elliot ..................................... 826Hudgins v. Wrights ............................ 1213, 1220Hurtado v. California .................... 809, 886, 888, 898Hylton v. United States ............................. 1332

ICG Communications, Inc. v. Allegiance TelecomInternational Brotherhood of Teamsters v.

United States ............................

JJacobellis v. Ohio ...........................Jenness v. Fortson ..........................Johnson v. Long John Silver's Restaurants, Inc...Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co ...................Judges v. Attorney-General of Saskatchewan .....Juilliard v. Greenman .......................

Kahn v. Shevin .........................Kamper v. Hawkins ......................Keating v. Superior Court .................Kennecott Corp. v. Kyocera International, Inc..Ker v. Illinois ...........................Knight v. Florida ........................Knowlton v. Moore .......................K nox v. Lee .............................Koch Materials Co. v. Shore Slurry Seals, Inc..Korematsu v. United States ................Koveleskie v. SBC Capital Markets, Inc .......Kozminski, United States v ...............Krause v. Commissioner for Inland Revenue ..

807

........ 686

.... 914,954

....... 2134

....... 2013

....... 1771

....... 1202

.... 832,833

.... 807,812

....... 1994

...1274,1275

... 1733,1736

........ 390813,898,901

........ 882

........ 826

.... 807,811

........ 679

...1069,1097

....... 1758

....... 1098

........ 833

20061 2181

WILLIAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW

LLackey v. Green Tree Financial Corp ................... 1718Lanning v. SEPTA .................................. 972Lawrence v. Texas .... 29, 748, 804, 869, 877, 878, 886, 888, 897Livingston v. Van Ingen ............................ 1379Lochner v. New York ......................... 819, 820, 887Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc ..................... 386Lopez, United States v ......................... 1346, 1389Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp .......... 1538Los Angeles Department of Water & Power v. Manhart ..... 972Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council ............... 1542Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co .......................... 1750Luther v. Borden .......... 1905, 1908, 1915, 1919, 1925, 1927

MM aine v. Thiboutot ................................ 1492Marbury v. Madison ...................... 1070, 1275, 1371Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc .................. 54Martin v. Hunter's Lessee ....................... 1269, 1344Massachusetts v. EPA .............................. 2112Mathews v. Eldridge ............................... 1102Mayor of New York v. Miln .......................... 1384McCulloch v. Maryland ..... 1343, 1365, 1372, 1373, 1381, 1389McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green ................ 925, 1937Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co ....................... 676Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson ................. 1832Microsoft Corp. v. Multi-Tech Systems, Inc ................ 55Miller v. California .................. 2131, 2135, 2147, 2167Miller v. Johnson .............................. 1935, 1942Miller, United States v .............................. 711Miranda v. Arizona ......... 846, 850, 854, 898, 890, 904, 2050Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan .... 1958, 1977, 1987Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada .................... 2028M itchell v. Helms .................................... 36M itchell v. Laird .................................. 1087Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States ........... 1537Monsanto v. Schmeiser .............................. 402Moore's Administrator v. Dawney ..................... 1420

2182 [Vol. 47:2177

20061 INDEX-TABLE OF CASES 2183

Morrison, United States v ........................ 1346, 1389M orse v. Boswell .................................. 1091M oskowitz v. Lopp ................................. 1037Muller v. Oregon .................... 820, 822, 887, 888, 902Muller v. United States Steel Corp ..................... 1824Murray v. Schooner Charming Betsy ............... 764, 765Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. v. Monsanto Co .............. 392

NNavajo Nation v. Peabody Holding Co .....New Jersey v. T.L.O ..................New York Life Insurance Co. v. Hendren ...New York v. Quarles ...................New York v. United States ...............Nguyen v. INS ........................Nollan v. California Coastal Commission ..

... 683503

... 807854,898

134619931516

O'Malley v. WoodroughOrlando v. Laird .....Osborn v. Nicholson ...Osborne v. Ohio ......

Pacific States v. Oregon ........Palko v. Connecticut ..........Pallas v. Hill ................Paradise, United States v .......Parke-Davis v. Mulford ........

...... 831

..... 1089

...... 805

.2138,2165

..................... 1926

....... 809,827,828,886,889

..................... 1272

................. 1961,2014

...................... 405Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York ..... 1543Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman ........ 1492Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders ................... 1813Perkins, United States v .............................. 830Phillips v. AWH Corp. (Phillips I) ...................... 70Phillips v. AWH Corp. (Phillips II) ...................... 55Phillips v. AWH Corp. (Phillips III) .................. 54, 90Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp ....................... 923Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts ...................... 1772

2184 WILLIAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW [Vol. 47:2177

Playboy Enterprises v. Welles ......................... 694Poe v. Ullm an ..................................... 869Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United States .... 1539Powell v. MacCormack ......................... 1911, 1949Powell v. Alabama ................................ 2049Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins ......................... 931Printz v. United States ............. 756, 880, 906, 1346, 1389

QQualls v. Rumsfeld ............................ 1077, 1101

RRapoport v. Dement ................................. 388Redrup v. New York ................................ 2135Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc ............. 928Regina v. Wagstaffe ................................. 804Rex v. Bourne ..................................... 871Reynolds v. Sims .......... 1905, 1906, 1927, 1930, 1941, 1945Reynolds v. United States ......... 754, 792, 793, 802, 886, 898Rice v. Efford ..................................... 1420Ring v. Arizona .................................... 733Rochin v. California ............................ 842, 891Rodriguez v. British Columbia ........................ 873Roe v. Texas Department of Protective and

Regulatory Services ........................... 477, 492Roe v. Wade ......... 25, 755, 840, 868, 869, 872, 878, 886, 904Roper v. Simmons .......... 743, 744, 748, 785, 807, 840, 846,

864,893,893,899Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co ......................... 378Rose v. Himely .......................... 766, 767, 769, 896Rostker v. Goldberg ............................ 1068, 1995Roth v. United States ............................... 2133Rumsfeld v. Padilla ................................ 1096

SSabree v. Richman ........................... 1488, 1503San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City of San Francisco ........... 1574Sandoval v. Mendez ................................ 1860

INDEX-TABLE OF CASES

Santiago v. Rumsfeld ..........................Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc .....Shaw v. Reno ............. 1902, 1906, 1936, 1937,Shelley v. Kraemer.

1073,1086..... 3801938,1943

............................... 1759Smith v. City of Jackson ............................. 975Smith, United States v ...................... 894, 898, 908SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp .............. 401Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain ............................ 758Spiegel, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission ............. 1695St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks .................. 935, 988Stanley v. Georgia .............. 2136, 2146, 2147, 2164, 2167State v. M ann ..................................... 1162State v. Webb ................................. 2074, 2076State Street Bank & Trust Co. v.

Signature Finance Group, Inc ....................... 404State v. W ilkerson .................................. 445Stones v. Keeling .................................. 1416Strickland v. Washington ....................... 1609, 1627Structure v. Rights ................................ 1945SuperGuide Corp. v. DirecTV Enterprises ............... 111Sweatt v. Painter .................................. 2019

TTabb v. Archer .......................Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v.

Tahoe Regional Planning Agency ......Therma-Tru Corp. v. Peachtree Doors Inc..Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala ...Thompson v. Oklahoma ................Tilghman v. Proctor ...................

............. 1416

......... 1544, 1556

.............. 391

............. 1796

.......... 858,893

.............. 375Tom v. Roberts ...................... 1393, 1421, 1422, 1424Toro Co. v. Deere & Co .............................. 381Town of Flower Mound v.

Stafford Estates Ltd. Partnership ................... 1581Trop v. Dulles ...... 755, 840, 846, 847, 850, 856, 859, 892, 907TRW, Inc., United States ex rel. Bagley v ................ 665

20061 2185

WILLIAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW

UUnited Mine Workers of American 1992 Benefit Plan v.

Leckie Smokeless Coal Co.(In re Leckie Smokeless Coal Co.) .................... 361

Upstream v. Sawsburg ............................. 1047

VVernonia School District 47J v. Acton .................. 516Vieth v. Jubelirer ......................... 1899, 1901, 1951Virginia, United States v .......... 1957 1974, 1987, 2019, 2038Vorchheimer v. School District of Philadelphia .......... 2002

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Garlock, Inc ......Walden v. Payne ............................Wallis v. Spencer ............................Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. America Online, Inc..Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio ..............Washington v. Glucksburg ............ 751, 868,Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust .............Weeks v. United States .................Wengler v. Druggists Mutual Insurance Co.Whitney v. Robertson ..................Wildauer v. Frederick County ...........Wilkerson v. Utah ....................Willson v. Black Bird Creek Marsh Co. ....Wolf v. Colorado ....................Wood v. Broom .......................

yYork v. Ferber .......................Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer

z

....... 387

...... 1409

....... 492

....... 107

... 953,960873,878,903959,964,985

.......... 843,889

.............. 1993

.............. 792

.............. 512

.............. 846

............. 1383

... 840, 843, 845, 889

............. 1922

............. 2137

............. 1082

Zlotnick v. TIE Communications ....... 1007, 1015, 1035, 1057

2186 [Vol. 47:2177