study of physical activity during pandemic coronavirus disease ...

i

LAPORAN PENELITIAN KERJA SAMA INTERNASIONALPROGRAM STUDI S2 ILMU KEOLAHRAGAAN

TAHUN ANGGARAN 2020

JUDUL PENELITIAN

STUDY OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY DURING PANDEMIC CORONAVIRUS DISEASE(COVID-19) IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA

Oleh:Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes.

Dr. dr. Rachmah Laksmi Ambardini, M.Kes.Dr. Widiyanto, M.Kes.

Peneliti Mitra:Profesor Madya Dr. Mohd Izwan bin Shahril

Faculty of Sport Science and CoachingUniversiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) Malaysia

Penelitian ini Dibiayai oleh DIPA BLU Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Nomor: SPDIPA-023.17.2.677509/2020, Tanggal 27 Desember 2019 berdasarkan Surat

Perjanjian Pelaksanaan Penelitian Nomor 3242A/UN4.17/SPK/2020Tanggal 11 Mei 2020

LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKATUNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA

TAHUN 2020

ii

LEMBAR PENGESAHANLAPORAN PENELITIAN KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL PROGRAM STUDI

1. Judul Penelitian : STUDY OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY DURINGPANDEMIC CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) ININDONESIA AND MALAYSIA

2. Ketua Peneliti :a. Nama lengkap : Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes.b. Jabatan : Guru Besarc. Program Studi : Ilmu Keolahragaan - S2d. Alamat : Perumahan Bale Asri Blok A No.2 Pereng Dawe, Bale

Catur, Gamping, Sleman Jl.Wates Km.9e. Telepon : +6281328777391f. e-mail : [email protected]

3. Bidang Keilmuan : Keolahragaan4. Skim : Penelitian Kerjasama Internasional Program Studi5. Tema Penelitian Payung : Implementasi olahraga kesehatan dan olahraga masyarakat6. Sub Temap Penelitian

Payung: Keolahragaan

7. Kelompok Peneliti :No Nama, Gelar NIP Bidang Keahlian1. Dr. Widiyanto, S.Or., M.Kes 19820605 200501 1 002 Biomekanika Olahraga2. Dr. dr. Rachmah Laksmi

Ambardini, M.Kes.19710128 200003 2 001 Histologi

8. Mahasiswa yang terlibat :No Nama NIM Prodi1. Carles Nyoman Wali 19711251050 Ilmu Keolahragaan2. Era Pratiwi 19711251071 Ilmu Keolahragaan3. Doni Pranata 19711251023 Ilmu Keolahragaan

9. Lokasi Penelitian : Indonesia dan Malaysia10. Waktu Penelitian : 1 Mei 2020 s/d 1 September 202011. Dana yang diusulkan : Rp. 50.000.000,00

Mengetahui, Yogyakarta, 20 November 2020Direktur PPs, Ketua Pelaksana

Prof. Dr. Suyanta, M.Si. Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes.NIP 19660508 199203 1 002 NIP 19610816 198803 1 003

iii

STUDY OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY DURING PANDEMIC CORONAVIRUS DISEASE(COVID-19) IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA

By:Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes., Dr. dr. Rachmah Laksmi Ambardini, M.Kes.,

Dr. Widiyanto, M.Kes.

ABSTRACT

Corona virus is a type of virus that is endemic throughout the world. This studyaims to determine the study of physical activity during the Covid19 era in Indonesiaand Malaysia.

The technique used in this research is analytic observational with a cross sectionalapproach. The samples in this study were students of the Faculty of Sports Science,Yogyakarta State University and the Faculty of Sports Science, Sultan Idris Universityof Education, Malaysia. The instruments employed to collect the data usedmeasurement of the level of understanding carried out by the test method. The levels ofphysical activity were measured Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)questionnaires. The analysis technique used in this research is analytic observationalresearch.

The results in this study indicate that the subjects think that the study of moderateand strenuous physical activity is needed in the midst of a pandemic with the largestpercentage of all respondents' answers through distributed instruments resulting inanswers to questions 1 to 16, respondents agree that moderate physical activity is thevery choice. liked by the respondents. Result of the 94 respondents the overallcalculation of each question is 1,233.84. Results of this study are on a medium scalewith information ≥ 600 - 3000 Total Physical Activity Assessment. Chose moderatephysical activity in maintaining the stability of the body's immunity during the Covid-19 epidemic with GPAQ.

.Keyword: study, physical activity, Indonesia, Malaysia

iv

CONTENT

COVER ....................................................................................................... iVALIDITY SHEET .................................................................................... iiABSTRACT ................................................................................................ iiiCONTENT .................................................................................................. iv

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................... 4CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD ..................................................... 18CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSION ............................................. 20CHAPTER V CONCLUTION .................................................................... 31

REFERENCE .............................................................................................. 32ATTACHMENT ......................................................................................... 35

1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Introduction

The Coronavirus (Covid-19) was introduced this past December, 2019 in China

(Wuhan) and the infection has spread throughout the world despite strategies adopted

by the Chinese government to stop this epidemiological phenomenon. Three months

later, Covid-19 has become a worldwide pandemic with more than 353,000 cases

confirmed on March 23th 2020, 15,000 deaths and more than 100,000 recovered

around the world (Jiménez-Pavón, Carbonell-Baeza, & Lavie, 2020).

Most of the epidemiological experts agree that much of the success in

containing the virus in China and elsewhere has been due to rapid measures adopted

by the authorities to impose quarantine status for the majority of population. Therefore,

many of the most seriously affected countries after China, such as Italy and Spain,

adopted similar strategies several weeks later. In addition, based on the worldwide

information from the Covid-19 pandemic, some characteristics of the population at

higher risk for Covid-19 have been identified, such as being older people, those with

hypertension, diabetes or cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and CVD, and

patients with respiratory diseases or conditions (Jiménez-Pavón et al., 2020).

Many recommendations for exercise and physical activity by professional

organizations and government agencies have been published since the sui generis

publications of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM). The number of

recommendations has escalated after the release of the 1995 Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention (CDC)/ACSM public health recommendations (280) and the

1996 US Surgeon General’s Report, and the ostensibly contradictory recommendations

between these documents have led to confusion among health professionals, fitness

professionals, and the public. The more recent recommendations of the American Heart

Association (AHA) and the ACSM (155,264) and the 2008 Physical Activity

Guidelines for Americans have helped clarify public health recommendations for

2

physical activity, and these are now are incorporated into the current edition of the

ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription.

The purpose of this position stand is to provide scientific evidence-based

recommendations to health and fitness professionals in the development of

individualized exercise prescriptions for apparently healthy adults of all ages. When

appropriately evaluated and advised by a health professional (e.g., physician, clinical

exercise physiologist, nurse), these recommendations may also apply to persons with

certain chronic diseases or disabilities, with modifications required according to an

individual’s habitual physical activity, physical function, health status, exercise

response, and stated goals. The advice presented in this Position Stand is intended

principally for adults whose goal is to improve physical fitness and health; adult

athletes engaging in competitive sports and advanced training regimens can benefit

from more advanced training techniques (Garber et al., 2011).

On the other hand, PA and exercise have shown to be an effective therapy for

most of the chronic diseases with direct effects on both mental and physical health. In

fact, exercise has been considered the real polypill based on epidemiological evidence

of its preventive/therapeutic benefits and considering the main biological mediators

involved. Special attention is deserved for the elderly population group, because in

older people PA and exercise impact the mentioned benefits on many diseases but also

has additional effects on hallmarks of aging and associated diseases. In this sense,

exercise in older people positively affects and prevents frailty, sarcopenia/dynapenia,

risk of falls, self-esteem and cognitive impairment or decline. Therefore, to not totally

interrupt or change the lifestyle of people during quarantine and to maintain an active

lifestyle at home is very important for the health of the overall population but,

especially, for those with additional risk factors and older people.

Although outdoor activities are typically more available, varied, and have more

facilities and infrastructures to perform any type of physical exercise, there still are

many possibilities for exercising at home during a quarantine. Clearly, we would

support the message of “doing at least some exercise is better than nothing”, however,

3

a more precise prescription and recommendation are needed to guarantee an

appropriate exercise program aimed to maintain or improve the principal health-related

physical fitness components.

Briefly, the reason to promote PA and exercise for improving physical fitness

components is that these (cardiorespiratory fitness or CRF, muscular strength,

coordination-agility) are directly related with the physiological functions of the main

organ systems (respiratory, circulatory, muscular, nervous and skeletal systems) and

indirectly implicated in the appropriate functioning of other systems (endocrine,

digestive, immune or renal systems) (Jiménez-Pavón et al., 2020). The purpose of this

study is to obtain a general picture physical activity during quarantine due to

coronavirus disease (Covid-19) pandemic in communities in Indonesia and in

Malaysia.

4

CHAPTER II

LITERATURE REVIEW

A. Coronavirus

In December 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause was

linked to a seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China. A previously unknown beta

coronavirus was discovered through the use of unbiased sequencing in samples from

patients with pneumonia. Human airway epithelial cells were used to isolate a novel

coronavirus, named 2019-nCoV, which formed a clade within the subgenus

sarbecovirus, Orthocoronavirinae subfamily. Different from both MERS-CoV and

SARS-CoV, 2019-nCoV is the seventh member of the family of coronaviruses that

infect humans. Enhanced surveillance and further investigation are ongoing (Zhu et al.,

2020).

In December, 2019, Wuhan, Hubei province, China, became the centre of an

outbreak of pneumonia of unknown cause, which raised intense attention not only

within China but internationally. Chinese health authorities did an immediate

investigation to characterise and control the disease, including isolation of people

suspected to have the disease, close monitoring of contacts, epidemiological and

clinical data collection from patients, and development of diagnostic and treatment

procedures. By Jan 7, 2020, Chinese scientists had isolated a novel coronavirus (CoV)

from patients in Wuhan. The genetic sequence of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-

nCoV) enabled the rapid development of point-of-care real-time RT-PCR diagnostic

tests specific for 2019-nCoV (based on full genome sequence data on the Global

Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data [GISAID] platform). Cases of 2019-nCoV are

no longer limited to Wuhan. Nine exported cases of 2019-nCoV infection have been

reported in Thailand, Japan, Korea, the USA, Vietnam, and Singapore to date, and

further dissemination through air travel is likely.

As of Jan 23, 2020, confirmed cases were consecutively reported in 32

provinces, municipalities, and special administrative regions in China, including Hong

5

Kong, Macau, and Taiwan. 3 These cases detected outside Wuhan, together with the

detection of infection in at least one household cluster— reported by Jasper Fuk-Woo

Chan and colleagues in The Lancet—and the recently documented infections in health-

care workers caring for patients with 2019-nCoV indicate human-to-human

transmission and thus the risk of much wider spread of the disease. As of Jan 23, 2020,

a total of 835 cases with laboratory confirmed 2019-nCoV infection have been detected

in China, of whom 25 have died and 93% remain in hospital. In The Lancet, Chaolin

Huang and colleagues report clinical features of the first 41 patients admitted to the

designated hospital in Wuhan who were confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV by

Jan 2, 2020. The study findings provide first-hand data about severity of the merging

2019-nCoV infection. Symptoms resulting from 2019-nCoV infection at the prodromal

phase, including fever, dry cough, and malaise, are nonspecific. Unlike human

coronavirus infections, upper respiratory symptoms are notably infrequent. Intestinal

presentations observed with SARS also appear to be uncommon, although two of six

cases reported by Chan and colleagues had diarrhoea. Common laboratory findings on

admission to hospital include lymphopenia and bilateral ground-glass opacity or

consolidation in chest CT scans.

These clinical presentations confounded early detection of infected cases,

especially against a background of ongoing influenza and circulation of other

respiratory viruses. Exposure history to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale market served

as an important clue at the early stage, yet its value has decreased as more secondary

and tertiary cases have appeared. Of the 41 patients in this cohort, 22 (55%) developed

severe dyspnoea and 13 (32%) required admission to an intensive care unit, and six

died. Hence, the case-fatality proportion in this cohort is approximately 14·6%, and the

overall case fatality proportion appears to be closer to 3% (table). However, both of

these estimates should be treated with great caution because not all patients have

concluded their Illness (ie, recovered or died) and the true number of infections and

full disease spectrum are unknown. Importantly, in emerging viral infection outbreaks

the case-fatality ratio is often overestimated in the early stages because case detection

6

is highly biased towards the more severe cases. As further data on the spectrum of mild

or asymptomatic infection becomes available, one case of which was documented by

Chan and colleagues, the case-fatality ratio is likely to decrease. Nevertheless, the

1918 influenza pandemic is estimated to have had a case-fatality ratio of less than 5%

but had an enormous impact due to wide spread transmission, so there is no room for

complacency (Wang, Horby, Hayden, & Gao, 2020).

Table. Characteristics of patients who have been infected with 2019-nCoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV (Wang et al., 2020).

The coronaviruses are members of a family of enveloped viruses that replicate

in the cytoplasm of animal host cells. They are distinguished by the presence of a

single-stranded plus-sense RNA genome about 30 kb in length that has a cap structure

and polyadenyla-tion tract. Upon infection of an appropriate host cell, the most open

reading frame (ORF) of the viral genome is translated into a large polyprotein that is

cleaved by viral-encoded proteases to release several nonstructural proteins, including

7

an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Rep) and an adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase)

helicase (Hel). These proteins, in turn, are responsible for replicating the viral genome

as well as generating nested transcripts that are used in the synthesis of the viral

proteins. The mechanism by which these subgenomic mRNAs are made is not fully

understood. However, recent evidence indicates that transcription-regulating

sequences (TRSs) at the end of each gene represent signals that regulate the

discontinuous transcription of subgenomic mRNAs. The TRSs include a partially

conserved core sequence (CS) that in some coronaviruses is CUAAAC. Two major

models have been proposed to explain the discontinuous transcription in coronaviruses

and arterioviruses. The discovery of transcriptionally active, subgenomic-size minus

strands containing the antileader sequence and of transcription intermediates active in

the synthesis of mRNAs favors the model of discontinuous transcription during the

minus strand synthesis (Marra et al., 2003).

Coronaviruses are enveloped non-segmented positivesense RNA viruses

belonging to the family Coronaviridaeand the order Nidovirales and broadly distributed

inhumans and other mammals. Although most human coronavirus infections are mild,

the epidemics of the two betacoronaviruses, severe acute respiratorysyndrome

coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-

CoV), have caused more than 10 000 cumulative cases in the past two decades, with

mortality rates of 10% for SARS-CoV and 37% for MERS-CoV. The coronaviruses

already identified might only be the tip of the iceberg, with potentially more novel and

severe zoonotic events to berevealed (Huang et al., 2020).

The discovery that a novel coronavirus is the probable cause of the newly

recognized severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (Holmes, 2003). Coronaviruses

have been assigned to three groups, IBV being in Group 3. The groups were initially

devised on the basis of a lack of antigenic relationships between the species of different

groups. The location of the non-gene 1 ns protein genes has also been used as a property

said to be group specific. However, as more coronaviruses are discovered and analysed,

this criterion gets decreasingly valid. For example, until SARS-CoV was discovered,

8

IBV and closely related viruses were unique in having an ns protein gene between the

M and N genes. Indeed, SARS-CoV has more protein genes interspersed amongst the

structural protein genes than any other coronavirus. Currently Group 3 members are

exclusively from avian species. Coronaviruses undergo recombination; if a cell is

infected by two strains of a given species of coronavirus, then progeny with sequence(s)

derived from both parents may result. This has been demonstrated experimentally for

IBV whilst sequencing of many field strains has provided convincing evidence that

many, possibly all, IBV strains are recombinants between different IBV strains

(Cavanagh, 2007).

Figur. Structure of Coronavirus (Holmes, 2003)

9

Figur. Management of Suspected SARS (Holmes, 2003)

B. Physical Activity

Physical activity as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles which

results in energy expenditure (EE) (Budde et al., 2016). Exercise is defined as planned,

structured, and repetitive physical activity that is performed to improve or maintain

fitness. Among adults living with spinal cord injury (SCI), participation in exercise

improves physical fitness (i.e., cardiorespiratory fitness, power output, and muscle

10

strength). Exercise may also have health benefits (e.g., reduced risk of cardiometabolic

disease and osteoporosis) through improvements in factors such as body composition,

lipid profiles, and bone mineral density. Nevertheless, people with SCI do far less

exercise, and are more physically deconditioned than the general population and other

disability groups. An important first step toward using exercise to improve fitness and

health is formulating and implementing SCI-specific, evidence-based exercise

guidelines. Exercise guidelines are systematically developed statements providing

appropriate age- and ability-specific information regarding the course of action

required to maintain or enhance fitness, performance, or health (van der Scheer et al.,

2017).

Since 1985, terms like physical activity, exercise, fitness training, training,

fitness and physical fitness are often confused with one another and sometimes they

are used interchangeably. The rapid socio-economic and demographic mutations, the

need to benefit from the natural dimension has led to a diversification of the application

of physical exercise/sport that today it presents itself with different objectives and with

the research of different forms of satisfaction. Thus decreasing the demand of

organized sport, competitive racing and the increase of individualized physical

activities, aimed to achieve different objectives such as inner balance or

psychophysical well-being. The phenomenon of physical exercises or commonly

defined as “fitness”, “exercise”, “conditioning”, “resistance training” or better “fitness

training”, however, is a very complex reality. Indeed, with the term fitness, it is

possible to identify a range of activities that are conducted every day in fitness centers

(Gyms) and we can regroup them into Gym resistance training activities; Group fitness

activities; Functional fitness activities.

In the last decade, the activities that undergo the term Fitness have evolved.

Initially aerobics, step aerobics, jogging, conditioning and bodybuilding were the most

common gym activities that enabled population to “be fit”, now we may found more

diversified and more careful to the needs of active and non-active population activities.

Some examples are: funky, zumba, fit box, cycling activities, calisthenics based

11

training, cross fit, suspension training, kettlebell training, total body conditioning, core

training, boot camp, functional training, pilates, yoga, stretching. It is clear that

including such activities under the more generic term fitness or fitness training, a

psychological process starts in people’s mind that day after day mutates the meaning

of the term itself. There are various definitions of fitness, that go from an ability to

perform daily activities with vigor, to a demonstration of traits and capacities that are

associated with a low risk of premature development of hypokinetic diseases (e.g.,

those associated with physical inactivity). Although, when we speak about fitness we

include the state of wellness that is defined as a multidimensional state of being

describing the existence of positive health in an individual as exemplified by quality of

life and a sense of well-being.

Consistent with this definition, there is no doubt that there is a strong

relationship between physical fitness and many components of wellness. However,

physical fitness is neither health, nor wellness. There is considerable evidence that

physical fitness, and the behaviors that build it, can reduce risk of illness and early

death. In addition, fitness can lead to enhanced cognitive functioning and can enhance

one’s ability to participate in leisure, often a satisfying social experience. However,

both health and wellness are much broader terms than physical fitness. Poor health can

occur even in highly fit people because of factors beyond personal control such as

hereditary conditions or conditions caused by bacterial/viral infections. A low fitness

level is widely associated with hypokinesia. This is a risk factor for various diseases

such as coronary diseases, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, hypertension and

hypercholesterolemia. Although, inactive people develop a RR due to CHD that is

similar to those who smoke cigarettes, have hypertension and have

hypercholesterolemia. This is just one of the countless examples that confirm that

regular exercise represents an important factor in prevention against disease, that are

most often associated with death in industrialized countries.

Analyzing various populations that go from youth to elderly, from health to

pathological conditions, from specific to recreational fitness users, we will try to

12

answer to some questions such as what benefit fitness training have on health? Or

which is its preventive role? And witches are fitness’s major implications? And more

in general, what is fitness training? (Paoli & Bianco, 2015).

One of the world’s leaders on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health, on

many occasions “physical inactivity and low level of CRF are perhaps the greatest

threats to health in the 21st century. This issue of Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

(PCVD) aims to update and advance the science of physical activity (PA), exercise

training, and CRF in health and diseases (Wisloff & Lavie, 2017).

Table of Definition of key terms (Garber et al., 2011).

Current physical activity guidelines including those from the Canadian Society

for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) recommend that adults should accumulate at least 150

min of moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity per week in order to

achieve health benefits. The CSEP guidelines do not specifically define intensity

13

ranges, however guidelines from other agencies including the American College of

Sports Medicine classify moderate intensity as 64-76% of maximal heart rate (HRmax)

[46-63% of maximal oxygen update (VO2max) and vigorous intensity as 77- 95% of

HRmax (64-90% VO2max). While public health guidelines are based on very strong

scientific evidence, accelerometer data indicate that as many as 85% of Canadians do

not meet the minimum physical activity recommendations with “lack of time” being

one of the most commonly cited barriers to regular participation. Recent evidence from

relatively small, short-term studies suggests that high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

may be as effective as traditional moderate-intensity continuous training to induce

physiological remodelling, which in turn may be associated with improved health

markers, despite a reduced time commitment (Gillen & Gibala, 2014).

14

Table of Evidence statements and summary of recommendations for theindividualized exercise prescription (Garber et al., 2011).

15

C. Physical Activity and Immunity

Exercise has a profound effect on the normal functioning of the immune system.

It is generally accepted that prolonged periods of intensive exercise training can depress

immunity, while regular moderate intensity exercise is beneficial. Single bouts of

exercise evoke a striking leukocytosis and a redistribution of effector cells between the

blood compartment and the lymphoid and peripheral tissues, a response that is

mediated by increased hemodynamics and the release of catecholamines and

glucocorticoids following the activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the

hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. Single bouts of prolonged exercise may impair

T-cell, NK-cell, and neutrophil function, alter the Type I and Type II cytokine balance,

and blunt immune responses to primary and recall antigens in vivo. Elite athletes

frequently report symptoms associated with upper respiratory tract infections (URTI)

during periods of heavy training and competition that may be due to alterations in

mucosal immunity, particularly reductions in secretory immunoglobulin A. In contrast,

single bouts of moderate intensity exercise are “immuno-enhancing” and have been

used to effectively increase vaccine responses in “at-risk” patients. Improvements in

immunity due to regular exercise of moderate intensity may be due to reductions in

inflammation, maintenance of thymic mass, alterations in the composition of “older”

and “younger” immune cells, enhanced immunosurveillance, and/or the amelioration

of psychological stress. Indeed, exercise is a powerful behavioral intervention that has

the potential to improve immune and health outcomes in the elderly, the obese, and

patients living with cancer and chronic viral infections such as HIV (Simpson, Kunz,

Agha, & Graff, 2015).

It has long been known that acute and chronic exercise alters mucosal immunity

and the number and function of circulating cells of the innate immune system (e.g.

neutrophils, monocytes and natural killer cells) and the acquired immune system (T

and B lymphocytes). For example, T and B cell functions appear to be sensitive to

increases in training load in well-trained athletes, with decreases in circulating numbers

of Type 1 T cells, reduced T ceproliferative responses and falls in stimulated B cell Ig

16

synthesis. For a comprehensive review of the literature investigating the influence of

exercise on immunity readers are directed to the position statement of the ISEI.

In addition, the neurodocrine modulation of immunity (e.g. by glucocorticoids)

in response to stressors such as exercise has very recently been reviewed by Dhabhar.

Here we will provide a commentary on what we believe to be important recent

advances and continued controversies that will guide future research endeavours with

specific relevance, where available, to studies on immunity in well-trained athletes: the

anti-inflammatory health benefits of short-lasting moderate physical activity are dealt

with elsewhere in this special feature. Although the distinction between innate and

acquired branches of the immune system is somewhat crude, and we recognize that

these are inextricably linked (e.g. via the innate immune systems role in antigen

presentation), here we will focus first on innate and then on acquired cellular

components (Walsh & Oliver, 2016).

D. Physical Activity During Quarantine Covid 19

The principal elements we should consider to design a proper exercise program

for older people confined at home are exercise modality, frequency of practice, volume

and intensity (among others) (Jiménez-Pavón et al., 2020). Exercise prescriptions are

the “dose” of exercise given to participants, consisting of exercise type, frequency,

intensity, and duration (van der Scheer et al., 2017).

Exercise modality: A multicomponent exercise program is considered the most

adequate for older people from both settings of free-living and community dwelling. A

multicomponent exercise program includes aerobic, resistance, balance, coordination

and mobility training exercises. Recently, some researchers have also suggested to

integrate the concept of cognitive training during the exercise training session.

17

Exercise Frequency: The international guidelines of PA for older people recommend

5 days per week, which in this particular quarantine situation could be increased to 5-

7 days per week with adaptation in volume and intensity.

Exercise Volume: The guidelines recommend at least 150 to 300 min per week of

aerobic exercise and 2 resistance training sessions per week. Under the quarantine it

could be suggested to increase to 200-400 min per week distributed among 5-7 days to

compensate for the decrease in the normal daily PA levels. Moreover, a minimum of

23 days per week of resistance exercise could be recommended. Mobility training

exercises should be performed on all the training days and balance and coordination

should be distributed among the different training days (at least twice).

Exercise Intensity: The guidelines suggest moderate intensity for most of the sessions

and some amount of vigorous exercise per week. It is well-known that exercise at

moderate intensity improves the immune system, but vigorous intensity may even

inhibit it, especially in sedentary people. Thus, during quarantine times, moderate

intensity (40-60% heart rate reserve or 65-75% of maximal heart rate) should be the

ideal choice for older people to enhance the protective role of exercise.

Examples of Home Exercises: In case one does not have large equipment or specific

materials for training, the following options are available in any house; resistance

training through bodyweight exercises such as squats holding a chair, sitting and

getting up from the chair or going up and down a step, transporting items with light

and moderate weights (vegetables, rice, water, etc), aerobic exercises like walking

inside the house, dancing or balance exercise such as walking on a line on the floor,

walking on the toes or heels, walking heel-to-toe, and stepping over obstacles.

18

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHODS

Method

This research is an analytical observational study conducted with a cross-sectional

approach, namely the type of research that emphasizes the time of measurement or

observation of data at one time at a time frame carried out on the dependent and free

variables. Analytical observational research is carried out by conducting observations,

without any treatment from the researchers.

Population and Sample

The sample in this research was the students of the Sports Science Faculty in

Yogyakarta State University and Sports Science Faculty in University Pendidikan

Sultan Idris Malaysia.

Instrument

The instruments employed to collect the data used measurement of the level of

understanding carried out by the test method. The levels of physical activity were

measured Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) questionnaires.

Data Analysis

Data was processed descriptively analysis.

Total Physical Activity Calculation

To find out total physical activity, the following formula is used:

Total Physical Activity MET minutes / week = [(P2 x P3 x 8) + (P5 x P6 x

4) + (P8 x P9 x 4) + (P11 x P12 x 8) + (P14 x P15 x 4)]

(WHO, 2012).

Assessment of Total Physical Activity

The total value of physical activity (MET minutes / week) was categorized into 3 levels

as follows:

19

MET minutes / week Category≥ 3000 High

≥ 600-3000 Moderate< 600 Low

20

CHAPTER IV

RESULT AND DISCUSION

RESULT

The results of this study of Study Of Physical Activity During Pandemic CoronaVirus Disease (Covid-19) In Indonesia and Malaysia are presented in the form of acircle diagram with each indicator being asked of each respondent, both from Indonesiaand respondents from Malaysia. In this study, four criteria commonly found inrespondents are: age, country of origin, gender, and education level. Below are theresults obtained for each respondent in terms of the four criteria.

Figure 1. Gender

Figure 1 above illustrates the criteria for the gender of all respondents by fillingin the sheets of koesiner distributed by researchers in two countries by looking at thepie chart above, it is clear that the dominant respondent in this study is male with apercentage of 70.2% of the total respondent is 94 person. Thus the study of the Covid19 epidemic between Indonesia and Malaysia is dominated by men.

Figure 2. Country

21

The second picture above illustrates the results of respondents from bothcountries, namely Indonesia and Malaysia, the results of the diagram above show thatthe percentage of respondents from Indonesia is better 59.6% while Malaysia is 40.4%,thus the total number of respondents totaling 94 people is more dominated byrespondents from the State of Indonesia.

Figure 3. Age

The third picture above illustrates the critical results of the age element wherethe results obtained in this study show that the most dominating age in this study is theage of 21-25 years with the percentage being 85.1% while 15-20 years are in the order.second with a large percentage is 9.6% and 2.4% is aimed at the age 26-30 years.

Figure 4. Education Level

The fourth image illustrates the education level of the respondents in this study.The picture above explains the education level of undergraduate students / students(S1) is more dominant in this study with a presentation of 63.8% and students /postgraduate students (S2) with a presentation below that of S-1, namely 36.2%. Andeducation levels come from the two countries involved in collaborating in the field ofresearch to produce / renew in the world of education and health.

22

Of the four criteria described in the pie chart above, the researcher made 16questions that led to each activity carried out by the respondents who were involved inthis study. And the results of each question the researcher presented with a circlediagram.

Figure 5. The first question

In the fifth picture, questions about the activities carried out by the respondents,it turns out that the respondents answered that they did not do heavy activities but theydid moderate or even light activities to maintain immunity stability so that youngpeople would not experience fatigue, it can be concluded that the respondents did notdo activities tough during this pandemic.

Figure 6. Second question

The sixth picture above shows the results of the second question to therespondents by explaining that the respondents did strenuous activities 3 times a weekwith a presentation of 44.4%, this shows that the respondents' awareness of their healthwas very good, because the respondents were doing strenuous activities only on 3 timesa week it remains for gradual physical recovery.

23

Figure 7. Pertanyaan ke tiga

The seventh image above illustrates the length of physical activity carried out bythe respondents for a week / in daily life during Covid-19 with the presentation shownin the diagram above showing that the respondents did strenuous activity for 44.4%,which is the same as activity weight with a time of 30 to 59 minutes, then therespondents did strenuous physical activity with a standard time that is still normal inthe world of sports.

Figure 8. Question four

The eighth image above depicts the habits of the recipients to maintain heart rateand pulse stability by doing light activity and walking for 10 minutes repeatedly, andit turns out that it is true that the respondents did moderate activity and walked for 10minutes repeatedly - Repeat with a large percentage of 75.6%, from these results it canbe obtained information that the respondents carry out activities regularly in their dailylives.

24

Figure 9. Question five

The ninth picture illustrates the habits of the respondents doing moderateactivities in daily life by looking at the results of the picture above, the respondents domore moderate activity 5 days a week with a large percentage of 29%, if so the immunestability of the respondents is very good because of the molecule - molecules notneeded by the body can be excreted through moderate activity.

Figure 10. Question six

Figure 10 illustrates the results of the questions given to the respondents thatrespondents prefer to do moderate activity for 30 to 59 minutes. The results depictedin the pie chart provide information that the respondents did moderate activities in agood category because 41.9% did it with 30 to 59 minutes of greeting a day.

25

Figure 11. Question seven

The eleventh figure illustrates the results of the questions given to therespondents that the activity of walking, cycling to a place where the distance is 10minutes continuously is not liked by the respondents, this can be seen from thepercentage results of the diagram as much as 46.3% answered yes, while 53.7%answered the tenth question, this shows that cycling to a place within 10 minutes israrely done by the respondents.

Figure 12. Question eight

The twelfth figure illustrates the results of the questions to respondents that inthe number of times they walk or cycle to a place, it turns out that every day therespondents spend time walking and cycling in a week with the number of respondentsdepicted in the pie chart is 26.3%. It can be seen that the respondents often do walkingand cycling activities during the week.

Figure 13. Question nine

26

The thirteenth picture depicts the results of questions to respondents about thelength of time they have traveled and walked to a place. The results depicted in the piechart are that the respondents walk or cycle quite well, namely 30 minutes with a largepercentage of 45%, so the trips made by the respondents fall into the medium category.

Figure 14. The tenth question

The fourteenth figure illustrates the results of the questions to the respondentsthat the recreational activities carried out by the respondents whether in terms of fitness,playing football, or strenuous recreation are clearly illustrated above that therespondents answered yes that doing strenuous activities related to recreation is verypopular with large percentage 70.7%. Thus the respondents experienced a largeincrease in breath and pulse (at least in 10 minutes continuously).

Figure 15. Question eleventh

The fifteenth figure illustrates that the results of questions to respondents aboutdoing strenuous activities such as fitness and similar recreation in a week, it turns outthat the respondents do strenuous activity only on three days with the percentage in thepie chart is 42.9%. This shows that the respondents did strenuous activity but had timeto rest the muscles for the recovery period.

27

Figure 16. Question twelve

In the sixteenth figure illustrates the results obtained when asking questions torespondents that the respondents in this case students really like moderate activitieswith a duration of time that is not too long and not exhausting. If this happens, therespondents will experience fatigue and will be young to be infected with disease. Fromthe results depicted on the pie chart gives.

Figure 17. Question thirteenth

In the seventeenth picture illustrates the results obtained when giving questionsto respondents that when doing cycling, playing volleyball, swimming, which areclassified as moderate, it turns out that the respondents gave Yes answers with a largepercentage of 85.4% in the sense that the more moderate activity conducted by therespondents with a variety of games then get very good health for the respondents.

Figure 18. Question fourteenth

28

The eighteenth figure illustrates the results of the questions given to therespondents that in a week of activities carried out by the respondents, the respondentsdo moderate activities in a week three days a week by doing various moderate activitieswith various games or walking, or fitness. With the result the percentage is 38.2%.

Figure 19. Question fifteenth

The nineteenth figure illustrates the results carried out by the respondentsthroughout the day with moderate activities. The respondents carried out activities in aday with a duration of 30 to 59 minutes with the percentage is 57.6%, thus therespondents did moderate activity for 1 hour every day.

Figure 20. Question sixteen

The twentieth figure depicts the respondents who lie down and sit down a day bylooking at the results of the bar chart showing that 75.6% of respondents who sit andlie down during the day with a duration of 1 hour. Thus the activity that sat and onlylay down was good enough, in the sense that the respondents did not stay in a longduration.

From the 16 questions above then calculated with the GPAQ Interpretationformula

29

To find out the total results of physical activity, this study uses the GPAQInterpretation

Total Physical Activity MET minutes / week = [(P2 x W3 x 8) + (W5 x W6 x 4)+ (W8 x W9 x 4) + (W11 x W12 x 8) + (W14 x W15 x 4)].

The total value of physical activity (MET minutes / week) was categorized into3 levels, namely high medium low. The result of the overall calculation of eachquestion is 1,233.84, thus the results of this study are on a medium scale withinformation ≥ 600 - 3000 Total Physical Activity Assessment.

DISCUSION

The Covid-19 epidemic is a disease that cripples all activities for all humansaround the world (A. J. Pinto, D. W. Dunstan, N. Owen, E. Bonfá, and B. Gualano,2020). Even the limitations of movement cannot be avoided by people from variouscircles. This also applies to maintaining the health of every human being through light,moderate and heavy activities (A. Kumar and A. Somani, 2020). In maintaining humanhealth, people are required to carry out activities that provide health value to theirpersonalities to increase their immunity / immune system.

Moderate and heavy activities are activities that need to be done by a humanbeing to maintain the stability of his body, indirectly an individual experiences anobstacle due to limitations in doing every activity, both moderate and strenuous (L.Shanahan et al.,, 2020) Until now, the Corona virus is still a virus that is very fearedby all mankind, human movements are limited in order to break the chain of this virus.When seeing this event, a human being needs to make simple and useful breakthroughsin maintaining his body's health (G. Varghese, R. John, A. Manesh, R. Karthik, and O.Abraham, 2020).

Some of the symptoms of Covid-19 are detected with the naked eye or not, whatcan be seen with the naked eye are coughing, fatigue, fever, etc. Therefore, humanspace is limited, including when people do activities in groups or in open spaces [18]When a human's space for movement is limited, what will happen is physical inactivity,this will endanger human health and need, what happens is often experiencing pain,experiencing obesity and stiffness in muscles (C. Ranasinghe, C. Ozemek, and R.Arena, 2020).

Activity is an inseparable part of humans while humans are still alive, this hasbeen seen in ancient times where it was written by Hippocrates who said that moderateor strong activity can improve one's health, so during this period, moderate, heavy, long

30

or short activity is necessary. performed repeatedly with a steady motion time (A.Indini et al.,2020).

Physical activity is the main choice in carrying out various activities, for exampleplaying football, volleyball, swimming, fitness and cycling, which require excellentphysical condition and are not in a sick condition (A. Hammami, B. Harrabi, M. Mohr,and P. Krustrup, 2020). And one way to meet their health needs is through regular andcontinuous activities, in the sense that activities carried out by a human being must andoften do within a predetermined time (Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Ma, and Q. Di, 2020).And activity not only has a good impact on health alone but also has an impact on one'spsychology and social well-being (D. F. Robbiani et al., 2020).

With a specified time and always doing activities, in this Covid-19 outbreak, aperson will not experience an attack or be detected by Covid-19, physical activity isthe most important part of recreational sports Simple exercise through measurablemoderate or heavy activity has a positive impact in increasing the immunity of thehuman body properly, but it should be noted that exercising during the Covid-19pandemic has its own challenges, this is due to the limited space or place to do activities(M. T. Islam et al., 2020).

The results of calculations carried out by the researcher illustrate that sportseducation students prefer moderate physical activity but have many variations in theexercise. As for the research, it explains the three categories of each question asfollows:

High is in questions number 10, 9, 8,4, this is a very active activity for studentsto do in the covid-19 state. And the activities carried out are activities that have morethan one activity. Medium categories are in questions 3, 5, 7, and 2. This is that studentsdo activities that are continuous but not excessive and the form of activity carried outis singular and has a relatively short time but provides good benefits for the health ofstudents. The low category is in questions 16, 15, and 1. This is because students onlydo activities that do not require a lot of strength and do not have to move places or haveactivities outside the room, but do all their activities in the house.

31

CHAPTER V

CONCLUTION

Coronavirus is a collection of viruses that can infect the respiratory system. Inmany cases, this virus causes only minor respiratory infections, such as flu. However,this virus can also cause severe respiratory infections, such as lung infections(pneumonia). This virus is transmitted through sputum droplets from the respiratorytract, for example when in a crowded closed room with poor air circulation or directcontact. with a droplet.

Apart from the SARS-CoV-2 virus or Corona virus, viruses that are also includedin this group are the viruses that cause Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)and the viruses that cause Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). Even though itis caused by a virus from the same group, namely the coronavirus, COVID-19 hasseveral differences from SARS and MERS, including in terms of the speed of spreadand the severity of symptoms. Coronavirus or corona virus is a large family of virusesthat cause mild to moderate upper respiratory tract infections, such as flu. This virus isdangerous when it attacks the respiratory system in elderly people, this is due tolimitations in carrying out routine activities.

In general, activity is divided into 3 categories based on the intensity and amountof calories used, namely: light physical activity, moderate physical activity and heavyphysical activity. These activities include activities carried out at school, at work,activities in the family / household, activities during the trip and other activities carriedout to fill daily free time. Every activity carried out will have a good impact on thehuman body.

From the results of calculations with the GPAQ Interpretation formula, studentsfrom both universities are doing activities that are then providing many benefits formaintaining health during the pandemic period. thus this research is in the mediumcategory.

32

Reference

Bongiovanni, A., Mercatali, L., Fausti, V., & Ibrahim, T. (2020). Comment on‘Reorganisation of medical oncology departments during the novel coronavirusdisease-19 pandemic: a nationwide Italian survey” by Alice Indini et al. EuropeanJournal of Cancer.

Budde, H., Schwarzc, R., Velasques, B., Ribeiro, P., Holzweg, M., Machado, S., …Wegner, M. (2016). The need for differentiating between exercise, physicalactivity, and training. Structure, 7, 20.

Cavanagh, D. (2007). Coronavirus avian infectious bronchitis virus. VeterinaryResearch, 38(2), 281–297.

Consolo, U., Bellini, P., Bencivenni, D., Iani, C., & Checchi, V. (2020).Epidemiological Aspects and Psychological Reactions to COVID-19 of DentalPractitioners in the Northern Italy Districts of Modena and Reggio Emilia.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10),3459.

Garber, C. E., Blissmer, B., Deschenes, M. R., Franklin, B. A., Lamonte, M. J., Lee,I.-M., … Swain, D. P. (2011). Quantity and quality of exercise for developing andmaintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness inapparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Medicine & Sciencein Sports & Exercise, 43(7), 1334–1359.

Gillen, J. B., & Gibala, M. J. (2014). Is high-intensity interval training a time-efficientexercise strategy to improve health and fitness? Applied Physiology, Nutrition,and Metabolism, 39(3), 409–412.

Hammami, A., Harrabi, B., Mohr, M., & Krustrup, P. (2020). Physical activity andcoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): specific recommendations for home-based physical training. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-6.

Holmes, K. V. (2003). SARS-associated coronavirus. New England Journal ofMedicine, 348(20), 1948–1951.

Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., … Gu, X. (2020). Clinicalfeatures of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. TheLancet, 395(10223), 497–506.

Islam, M. T., Sarkar, C., El‐Kersh, D. M., Jamaddar, S., Uddin, S. J., Shilpi, J. A., &Mubarak, M. S. (2020). Natural products and their derivatives againstcoronavirus: A review of the non‐clinical and pre‐clinical data. PhytotherapyResearch.

33

Jiménez-Pavón, D., Carbonell-Baeza, A., & Lavie, C. J. (2020). Physical exercise astherapy to fight against the mental and physical consequences of COVID-19quarantine: Special focus in older people. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases.

Kumar, A., & Somani, A. (2020). Dealing with Corona virus anxiety and OCD. AsianJournal of Psychiatry, 102053.

Marra, M. A., Jones, S. J. M., Astell, C. R., Holt, R. A., Brooks-Wilson, A., Butterfield,Y. S. N., … Chan, S. Y. (2003). The genome sequence of the SARS-associatedcoronavirus. Science, 300(5624), 1399–1404.

Paoli, A., & Bianco, A. (2015). What is fitness training? Definitions and implications:a systematic review article. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 44(5), 602.

Pinto, A. J., Dunstan, D. W., Owen, N., Bonfá, E., & Gualano, B. (2020). Combatingphysical inactivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature ReviewsRheumatology, 1-2.

Ranasinghe, C., Ozemek, C., & Arena, R. (2020). Exercise and well-being duringCOVID 19–time to boost your immunity. Expert Review of Anti-infectiveTherapy, 1-6.

Robbiani, D. F., Gaebler, C., Muecksch, F., Lorenzi, J. C., Wang, Z., Cho, A., ... &Hagglof, T. (2020). Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection inconvalescent individuals. bioRxiv.

Shanahan, L., Steinhoff, A., Bechtiger, L., Murray, A. L., Nivette, A., Hepp, U., ... &Eisner, M. (2020). Emotional distress in young adults during the COVID-19pandemic: Evidence of risk and resilience from a longitudinal cohort study.Psychological medicine, 1-10.

Sharma, J. B., Sharma, E., Sharma, S., & Singh, J. (2020). Recommendations forprenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care during COVID‐19 pandemic in India.American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 84(5), e13336.

Simpson, R. J., Kunz, H., Agha, N., & Graff, R. (2015). Exercise and the regulation ofimmune functions. In Progress in molecular biology and translational science(Vol. 135, pp. 355–380). Elsevier.

van der Scheer, J. W., Ginis, K. A. M., Ditor, D. S., Goosey-Tolfrey, V. L., Hicks, A.L., West, C. R., & Wolfe, D. L. (2017). Effects of exercise on fitness and healthof adults with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Neurology, 89(7), 736–745.

Walsh, N. P., & Oliver, S. J. (2016). Exercise, immune function and respiratoryinfection: An update on the influence of training and environmental stress.Immunology and Cell Biology, 94(2), 132–139.

Wang, C., Horby, P. W., Hayden, F. G., & Gao, G. F. (2020). A novel coronavirus

34

outbreak of global health concern. The Lancet, 395(10223), 470–473.

Wisloff, U., & Lavie, C. J. (2017). Taking Physical Activity, Exercise, and Fitness toa Higher Level. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 60(1), 1–2.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2017.06.002

Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Ma, X., & Di, Q. (2020). Mental Health Problems during theCOVID-19 Pandemics and the Mitigation Effects of Exercise: A LongitudinalStudy of College Students in China. International Journal of EnvironmentalResearch and Public Health, 17(10), 3722.

Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., … Lu, R. (2020). A novelcoronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England Journalof Medicine.

35

Attachment 1. RESEARCH PERSONNEL

No Nama Instansi Asal Bidang Ilmu Uraian Tugas

1.Prof. Dr. Suharjana,M.Kes.

UniversitasNegeriYogyakarta

KebugaranJasmani

InstrumenPenelitian,Analisis DataPenelitian

2.Dr. dr. Rachmah LaksmiAmbardini, M.Kes.

UniversitasNegeriYogyakarta

HistologiKoordinatorPenelitian,Kerjasama

3. Dr. Widiyanto, M.Kes.UniversitasNegeriYogyakarta

Biomekanikaolahraga

Teknis diLapangan,pengambilandata penelitian

Research Output Targets

The output targets for this International Cooperation Research are presenters in

international forums / seminars, accredited national journals, and MoU (memorandum

of understanding).

36

Attachment 2. Budget

No Jenis Pengeluaran Anggaran

1 Bahan Habis Pakai Penelitian, BiayaPelaksanaan Penelitian di Indonesia danMalaysia, Perjalanan penelitian

Rp. 20.000.000,00

2 Penyusunan Instrumen, Pengumpulan data,Penelusuran Literatur

Rp. 15.000.000,00

3 Pengandaan, Peralatan, Pelaporan Rp. 7.500.000,00

4 Lain-lain: Publikasi, seminar, laporan Rp. 7.500.000,00

Jumlah Rp. 50.000.000,00

37

Attachment 3. Schedule

No

KegiatanMaret April Mei-Juni

Juli-September Oktober

1 IIIII

IV I II

III

IV I II

III

IV I II

III

IV I II

III

IV

1 Studi Pustaka

2 PenyusunanProposal

3 SeminarProposal

4 KoordinasiPeneliti,persiapanpenelitian

5 PelaksanaanPenelitian diIndosesia

6 PelaksanaanPenelitian dimalaysia

7 PenyusunanHasil Penelitiandan Draf Artikel

8 Seminar HasilPenelitian

9 Revisi danPelaporan HasilPenelitian danPublikasi

38

Attachment 4. Researcher Biodata

CURICULUM VITAEIDENTITAS

1. Nama Lengkap : Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes, AIFO

2. NIP : 196108161988031003

3. Tempat, tanggal lahir : Kulon Progo, 16 Agustus 1961

4. Pangkat dan Golongan : Pembina Utama, IV/e

5. Jabatan : Guru Besar (1050)

6. Bidang Ilmu/Mata kuliah : Pend. Kesehatan Olahraga/Kebugaran Jasmani

7. Jenis Kelamin : Pria

8. Agama : Islam

9. Fakultas : FIK Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

10. Jabatan Struktural : -

12. Alamat Kantor : FIK UNY, Jalan Colombo No. 1 Yogyakarta (55281)Tlp dan Fax. 0274 – 513092

13. Alamat Rumah : Perumahan The Resident G7 Ambar KetawangGamping, Sleman, Yogyakarta,Tlp. 081215072747e-mail: [email protected]

KARYA PENELITIANNo Judul Sumber

DanaBesarnyaDana(Rp)

Tahun

1 Trecher Study Mahasiswa S-2 Ika PPS UNY DIPA UNY 15 jt 20132 Analisis Program Kebugaran pada Pusat-pusat

kebugaran di JogjakartaDIPA UNY 10 jt 2013

3 Penelitian Peta Guru Taman Kanak-kanak di KotaJogjakarta

DIPA UNY 25 jt 2013

4 Evaluasi perkuliahan S2 IK PPs UNY DIPA UNY 25 jt 20145 Analisis aktivitas gerak siswa pada permainan

bola basket di SMPDIPA UNY 25 jt 2014

6 Pemetaan kealhian dosen FIK UNY berbasiskompetensi mengajar

DIPA UNY 10 jt 2014

7 Analisis Biomekanika Penjas Bola Basket DIPA UNY 12 jt 20158 Analisis Biomekanika Penjas SMK DIPA UNY 12 jt 20169 Penelusuran Alumni S2 Ilmu Keolahragaan PPs

UNYDIPA UNY 15 jt 2017

10 Managemen Persiapan Asian Games CabangAtletik Indonesia da Thailand

DIPA UNY 75jt 2018

39

11 Pengembangan Uji kebugaran Aerobik UntukLansia

DIPA UNY 20jt 2018

12 Upaya peningkatan kemandirian mahasiswadengan model pembelajaran daring

DIPA UNY 10 jt 2019

PUBLIKASI ILMIAHNo Judul Tulisan Nama Jurnal Tahun

1

Model Pembelajaran Penjas Melalui Permainan UntukPembentukan Karakter Kerja Sama, Tanggung Jawab DanKejujuran Siswa Sd

Jurnal KeolahragaanPPs UNY. Vol 1,No 2: September2013

2013

2

Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Bolavoli Pada SiswaSekolah Dasar Kelas Atas


2013

3Pengaruh Sirkuit Training Awal Akhir Latihan TeknikTerhadap Kardiorespirasi, Power, Smash, Passing Bawah AtletBola Voli

Jurnal KeolahragaanPPs UNY.Vol 1, No1: April 2013

2013

4

Model Permainan Tematik Integratif Untuk MeningkatkanKebugaran Jasmani, Mengenal Huruf Dan Angka Anak Tk


2014

5Pembuatan Tes Dan Norma Kebugaran Jasmani Untuk AnakUsia Dini (4-6) Tahun Di Provinsi Diy

Jurnal KeolahragaanPPs UNY. Vol 2,No 1: April 2014

2014

6

Pengembangan Model Latihan Sepak Bola BerbasisKelincahan Dengan Pendekatan Bermain


2015

7Pengaruh Metode Latihan Dan Tingkat Koordinasi TerhadapKeterampilan Passing Bola Voli Atlet Yunior Putri


2015

8

Pengaruh Metode Latihan Dan VO2 Max Terhadap DasarSepak Bola


2016

9Pengaruh Taebo High Dan Low Impact Terhadap KetahananOtot Dan Lemak Tubuh Ditinjau Dari VO2Maks


2016

10Pengaruh Metode Latihan Imagery Dan Konsentrasi TerhadapKetepatan Floating Service Atlet Bola Voli Diy

Jurnal CakrawalaPendidikan UNY.XXXV Oktober2016 No.03

2016

40

11Pengembangan model Permainan Sepak takraw SebagaiPembelajaran Penjas bagi Anak SD Kelas Atas


2017

12

Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran pengenalan Teknik DasarTenis Meja Untuk Siswa SD Kelas Atas


2017

13Pengembangan Video Pembelajaran Sinyal-sinyal Wasit BolaBasket Untuk Guru Penjas Orkes Sekolah Menengah Atas


2018

14

Model Senam Lansia Untuk Kebugaran Jasmani dan FungsiOtak


2018

15

Kontribusi Kemampuan Block dan Defense pada CabangOlahraga Bolavoli

Jurnal KepelatihanOlahraga,UniversitasPendidikanIndonesia Volume,12. No, 1. Maret2020

2020

MAKALAH DALAM KEGIATAN ILMIAH

No Judul Makalah Nama Kegiatan Tahun

1Sport as a key element in thedevelopment of public Health

Proceeding The International ConferenceSeagames 2011 Jakarta

2011

2Sirkuit training, VO2Max dan nilai pendikarakter

Proseding seminar membangun insanberkarakter

2012

Participation in learning pjkr studyprogram students por fik uny

Proceding International ConferencePhysical Education and Sport in Semarang

2012

3 Makna OR di PT Proseding seminar Pomnas di Yogyakarta 20134 Antara pend jas dengan pencapaiaan keb

jas siswaProseding seminar Nasional Penjas Orkesdlm kurikulum 2013

2013

5 Effectiveness Analysis of Motion inLearning Physical Education (Study ofSport Biomecanics)

Proceeding ISSES (International Seminar ofSport and Exercise Science 2014 Surabaya

2014

6 The Efect of Tera Gymnastic and LansiaBugar Gymnastic and Ohysical Fitness onthe Phychological Well Being of TheElderly

Seminar International ICCE UNY 2018(Proceeding Belum Terbit)

2018

41

PENGABDIAN PADA MASYARAKATNo Judul Sumber

DanaBesarnyaDana

Tahun

1 Pelatihan penyusunan aktivitas motorikanak usia dini bagi guru-guru TK di KabupatenKlaten

DIPAUNY

12.5jt 2011

2 Workshop Penyusunan ProgramLatihan kebugaran Fisik Atlet Usia Dini BagiGuru-guru MGMP SLTP Se kabupaten KulonProgo

DIPAUNY

12.5 jt 2012

3 Pelatihan penyusunan aktivitas fisikmotorik anak usia dini bagi guru-guru TK di KotaYogyakarta

DIPAUNY

12.5jt 2013

4 Pelatihan penyusunan ModelPembelajaran Fisik Motorik bagi guru-guru TKdi Kabupaten Kulon Progo

DIPAUNY

12.5 Jt 2014

5 Pelatihan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah bagiGuru SD di Kota Yogyakarta

DIPAUNY

12,5jt 2015

4 Pelatihan Penulisan Karya IlmiahBerbasis PTK bagi Guru di Kulon Progo

DIPAUNY

12,5jt 2016

5 Pendampingan Penulisan Karya Ilmiahbagi Guru SD di Kota Yogyakarta

DIPAUNY

12,5jt 2017

6 Palatihan Pelatih Woodbal DiKabupaten Kulon Progo

DIPAUNY

12,5jt 2018

42

PEMBUATAN BUKUNo Judul Tahun Keterangan1 Penggunaan Peralatan Fitness 2002 Untuk Kalangan Mahasiswa2 Kebugaran Jasmani 2004 Untuk Kalangan Mahasiswa3 Latihan Beban 2007 Untuk Kalangan Mahasiswa4 Pedoman Pembiaan Bolavoli 2007 Untuk Kalangan Mahasiswa

dan pelatih PBVSI5 Pengembangan Nilai-nilai Karakter

melalui Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga(dalam Buku Pendidikan Karakter)

2012 Untuk Umum ISBN

6 Kebugaran jasmani 2013 Utk Mhs dan UmumISBN: 978-929-99724-2-2

7 Kebugaran dan Kesehatan 2016 Untuk Kalangan mahasiswa8 Latihan beban Untuk Kebugaran

kesehatan dan Performa Atlet2018 Untuk mahasiswa dan Umum

ISBN: 978-602-4910-25-9

Yogyakarta, 12 Januari 2020Penyusun

Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes. AIFO

43

Curriculum Vittae

A. Identitas Diri1 Nama Lengkap Dr.dr. Rachmah Laksmi Ambardini, M.Kes.2 Jabatan Fungsional Lektor Kepala3 Jabatan Struktural -4 NIP/NIK/Identitas lainnya 1971012820000320015 NIDN 00280171086 Tempat dan Tanggal Lahir Yogyakarta, 28 Januari 19717 Alamat Rumah Jl.Nogopuro No. 9, Yogyakarta 552818 Nomor Telepon/Faks/ HP (0274) 484134/081229568869 Alamat Kantor Jl Kolombo No 1 Yogyakarta10 Nomor Telepon/Faks (0274)51303211 Alamat e-mail [email protected] Lulusan yang Telah Dihasilkan S-1= orang; S-2= - S-3= -13 Mata Kuliah yg Diampu

B. Riwayat PendidikanS1 S2 S3

Nama Perguruan Tinggi UniversitasGadjah Mada

UniversitasGadjah Mada

UniversitasGadjah Mada

Bidang Ilmu Kedokteran IlmuKedokteranDasar

Ilmu KedokteranDasar

Masuk-Lulus 1989-1994 2002-2005 2009-2015

Judul Skripsi/Thesis/Disertasi PerbandinganTekanan BolaMata antaraTindakan OperasidanMedikamentosapada PenderitaGlaukoma

EfekPemberianpanaxGinseng G115terhadapkadar MDAdan SODdarah padaLatihan FisikIntensitasSedang

HubunganPolimorfismeR577X GenaACTN3 danPerforma Fisimdalam OlahragaAtlet Indonesia

Nama Pembimbing/Promotor dr Gunawan,Sp.M

Prof Dr.Ngatidjan,M.Sc; Dr.Med. dr.IndwianiAstuti

Prof.dr. HariKusnanto, SU.Dr.PH; Dr. Med.dr. IndwianiAstuti; dr AhmadHamim Sadewa,Ph.D.

44

C. Pengakuan/Rekognisi DPTS

No. Nama DosenBidangKeahlian

RekognisidanBuktiPendukung1)

Tingkat2)

TahunWilayah Nasional

Interna-sional

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8123…Jumlah

D. Pengalaman PenelitianNo Tahun Judul Penelitian Pendanaan

Sumber Jml (Juta Rp)1. 2019 Efektivitas Soft Tissue Release

dan Deep Tissue Massage untukPenyembuhan CederaEkstremitas Bawah

DIPA FIK UNY 20

2. 2019 Uji Efektivitas Latihan YogaPada Penanganan NyeriPunggung Bawah

DIPA UNY 25

3. 2018 Pengembangan ModelStretching PNF dan CryotherapyDalam Pencegahan DelayedOnset Muscle Soreness (DOMS)

DIPA UNY 25

4. 2017 Efektivitas Integrated Learningdengan Virtual Mikroskopdalam Mata Kuliah HistologiPada Mahasiswa IlmuKeolahragaan

DIPA FIK UNY 10

5. 2017 Pengembangan ModelPembelajaran PendidikanJasmani Olahraga danKesehatan di Sekolah InklusiSekolah Dasar (Tahun I)

DIKTI

6. 2017 Efektivitas Integrated Learningdengan Virtual Mikroskopdalam Mata Kuliah Histologi

DIPA FIK UNY 10

45

Pada Mahasiswa IlmuKeolahragaan

7. 2016 Pengembangan ModelManipulasi Topurak untukReposisi Sendi Anggota GerakAtas

DIPA FIK UNY 10

8. 2015 Pola Perilaku Makan SehatMahasiswa FIK UNY

DIPA FIK UNY 10

9. 2015 Parameter Fisik SebagaiPrediktor “Speed Performance

DIPA FIK UNY 10

E. Pengalaman Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

No Tahun Judul PPM PendanaanSumber Jml (Juta Rp)

1 2019 Pemberdayaan Kader Posyandumelalui Metode Three LevelMarketing Menuju Lansia Sehatdan Mandiri

DIPA UNY -10

2 2018 Pelatihan Pencegahan danPenanganan Delayed OnsetMuscle Soreness (DOMS) PadaAtlet Pelatda DIY

DIPA FIK UNY -6

3 2017 Pelatihan Pengelolaan DiabetesBerbasis Masyarakat

DIPA FIK UNY 6

4 2016 Pelatihan Manipulasi Cepat untukReposisi Cepat bagi PelatihOlahraga

DIPA FIK UNY 6

5 2015 Pelatihan Tes Doping, TUE, danPencegahan Doping Pada PelatihOlahraga di DIY

DIPA FIK UNY 6

F. Pengalaman Penulisan Artikel IlmiahNo Judul Artikel Ilmiah Vol/No tahun Nama Jurnal1 The effectiveness of combination PNF

stretching and cryotherapy in the prevention ofDOMS in the lower extremities

Vol. 330./ 2018 Advances inSocial Science,Education andHumanitiesResearch(ASSEHR), Vol.330. 6thInterntionalConference onEducationalResearch and

46

Innovation(ICERI 2018).Atlantis Press.

2 Dragon Fruit Giving Effect AgainstMalondealdehide (MDA) Levels in Muay ThaiAthletes With High Intensity Interval Training(HIIT) Method

8(10):190-198.eISNN 2391-8306./2018

Journal ofEducation, Healthand Sport.

3 Inclusive Physical Education Implementation:Case study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

7(3.25): 197-200./ 2018

InternationalJournal ofEngineering &Technology,

G. Pengalaman Penyampaian Makalah Secara Oral Pada Pertemuan / Seminar Ilmiah

NoNamaPertemuanIlmiah /Seminar

Judul Artikel Ilmiah Waktu danTempat

1 YISPESS, 2017 Students’s Perception Towards IntegratedLearning Method Using Virtual Microscope inHistology Course

14 Oktober 2017,Eastparc Hotel,Yogyakarta

2 SeminarNasionalOlahraga (PeranOlahraga dalamEra Global).

Efektivitas Masase Topurak untuk ReposisiSubluksasi Bahu

31 Oktober 2016,FIK UNY

3 SeminarNasionalPeelitian

Faktor Genetik, Trainability, dan PerformaOlahraga: Kajian genetic Olahraga

13 Mei 2015,LPPM UNY

H. Pengalaman Penulisan Buku

NoJudul Buku Tahun Jumlah

HalamanPenerbit

I. Pengalaman Perolehan HKINo Judul/Tema HKI Tahun Jenis Nomor P/ID

1 Model Pembelajaran PendidikanJasmani, Olahraga dan Kesehatan diSekolah Dasar Inklusi-

2019 Hak Cipta EC00201980336

47

J. Produk yang belum di HKINo Judul/Tema HKI Tahun Jenis

-

K. Pengalaman Merumuskan Kebijakan Publik/Rekayasa Sosial LainnyaNo Judul/Tema/Jenis

Rekayasa Sosial Lainnyayang Telah Diterapkan

Tahun Tempat PenerapanResponsMasyarakat

-

L. Penghargaan yang Pernah DiraihNo Jeni1s Penghargaan Institusi Pemberi

PenghargaanTahun

1 Satyalancana Karya Satya X Tahun Presiden RI 2014

SK Mengajar

Semua data yang saya isikan dan tercantum dalam biodata ini adalah benar dan dapatdipertanggungjawabkan secara hukum. Apabila di kemudian hari ternyata dijumpai ketidak-sesuaian dengan kenyataan, saya sanggup menerima risikonya.

Yogyakarta, Februari 2020

Dr.dr. Rachmah Laksmi A, M.Kes.NIP 19710128 200003 2 001

48

A. CV

1. Nama dan Gelar : Dr. Widiyanto, M.Kes.2. Tempat Lahir : Klaten3. Tanggal Lahir : 5 Juni 19824. NIP : 19820605 200501 1 0025. Pangkat/Jab./Gol. : Penata Tingkat I / Lektor Kepala / III d6. Agama : Islam7. Jenis Kelamin : Laki-Laki8. Bidang Ilmu : Biomekanika Olahraga9. Program Studi/Jur : IKOR/PKR10. Fakultas : Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan11. Alamat Rumah : Jl. A. Yani No.25 Wonogiri12. Telepon : 08562904906 / 0273-332221113. E-mail : [email protected]

B. RIWAYAT PENDIDIKAN

No. Universitas Program Bidang Ilmu Tahun Lulus

1Universitas NegeriYogyakarta

S1 Ilmu Keolahragaan 2004

2 Universitas Airlangga S2 Kesehatan Olahraga 2008

3Universitas NegeriSurabaya

S3 Ilmu Keolahragaan 2012

C. MATAKULIAH YANG DIAMPU

No. Matakuliah Semester/Tahun Strata(S1, S2, S3) Ket.

1 Biomekanika OlahragaGanjil/Genap2018

S1 dan S2

2 Kebugaran JasmaniGanjil/Genap2018

S1 dan S2

3 Dasar Gerak Bolavoli Ganjil/ 2018 S1

4 Gizi Olahraga Genap/2015 S1

5 Dasar-dasar Ilmu Keolahragaan Ganjil/2018 S2

6 Olahraga dan Ketrampilan Hidup Ganjil/2018 S2

7

49

D. Training, Short Visit, dan Sejenisnya

1. TOT Outbond Nasional Tahun 20062. TOT Leadership 20083. Dosen Pendamping Studi Lab Mahasiswa S2 IK ke University of Malaya

20134. Dosen Pendamping Studi Lab Mahasiswa S2 IK ke Rumah Sakit khusus

cidera

E. PENELITIAN YANG TELAH DILAKUKAN

No. Judul Kedudukan Tahun Dana Ket.

1Karakteristik Lactate Threshold pada AtletTaekwondo DIY during Competition

Ketua Peneliti 2013 DIKTI

2Identifikasi Movement Density AtletTaekwondo DIY During Competition

Ketua Peneliti 2014 DIPA UNY

3Analisis Gerak Teknik Tendangan DepanAtlet Pencaksilat PPLM DIY


4Analisis Efektivitas Gerak dalamPembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani danOlahraga di SMP

Anggota Peneliti 2014 DIPA UNY

5Uji Falsifikansi Relevansi dan Konsep TesTKJI usia 6-9 Tahun

Ketua Peneliti 2015 DIKTI

6Penerapan umpanbalik untukmeningkatkan keterampilan dasar bolavolipasir atlet prima pratama

Ketua Peneliti 2015 Kemenpora

7Analisis gerak teknik Maegeri atlet karateUKM UNY


8Penyusunan Instrumen Tendangan dalampencak silat

Anggota 2015 DIPA UNY

9Meta Analisis Karya Tulis MahasiswaProdi IK PPs UNY


10Perbedaan nilai lactate threshold antar atletpredominan anaerobik dan aerobik


11Pengembangan Model Instruksional GerakKinestetik bagi Anak Sekolah Dasar Anggota 2016 DIPA UNY

12

Analisis penelitian skripsi mahasiswaProdi S1 Ikora Fakultas Ilmu KeolahragaanUNY


13ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS GERAKDALAM PEMBELAJARAN


50

PENDIDIKAN JASMANI DANOLAHRAGA DI SMK(Sebuah Pendekatan BiomekanikaOlahraga)

14

PEMBINAAN CABANG OLAHRAGAPENCAK SILAT PRESTASI DI DAERAHISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA (SebuahKajian Kritis)


15

TRECER STUDY MAHASISWALULUSAN PRODI S2 ILMUKEOLAHRAGAAN PROGRAMPASCASARJANAUNIVERSITAS NEGERIYOGYAKARTA


21

MANAGEMEN PERSIAPAN CABANGOLAHRAGA ATLETIK MENUJUASEAN GAMES 2018(Studi Komparasi Indonesia dan Thailand)


22

KADAR MALONDIALDEHYDE (MDA)DAN AKTIVITAS ENZIM SUPEROXIDEDISMUTASE (SOD) PLASMA DARAHPADA METODE LATIHAN MODERATEINTENSITY CONTINOUS TRAINING(MICT) DAN HIGH INTENSITYINTERVAL TRAINIG (HIIT)


23

PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARANBANDED LEARNING PADAMATAKULIAH BIOMEKANIKAOLAHRAGA UNTUKMENINGKATKAN KEMANDIRIANBELAJAR MAHASISWA S2 ILMUKEOLAHRAGAAN

Ketua 2019 DIPA UNY

24

PENINGKATAN HASILPEMBELAJARAN PADAMATAKULIAH KEBUGARANJASMANI MELALUI PEMBELAJARANDARING PADA PRODI S2 ILMUKEOLAHRAGAAN PPS UNY


51

F. PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT

No. Judul KeteranganTahun

1

Bimbingan Teknik bagi Pelatih Klub Olahraga Sekolah DasarDI DIY

2014

2 Festival Olahraga Anak Usia Dini 2014

3 Bimbingan Teknis Klub Olahraga SDDirektoratSD/2014

4 Bimbingan Teknis Klub Olahraga SDDirektorat SD/2015

5 Coaching Klinik bagi pelatih Bolavoli 2015

6

SOSIALISASI HASIL PENGEMBANGANPERALATAN DAN MODEL LATIHAN OLAHRAGA USIADINI BAGI GURU TK DAN PEMBINA OLAHRAGA USIADINI DI KABUPATEN BANTUL

2015

7

PENYULUHAN PENTINGNYA ASUPAN GIZI BAGITAEKWONDOIN YANG MASUK PEMBINAAN ATLETBERBAKAT DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA 2016

2016

8PELATIHAN PENULISAN KARYA ILMIAH BERBASISPENELITIAN PTK BAGI GURU-GURU PENJAS DI KOTAYOGYAKARTA

2016

9BIMBINGAN KEBUGARAN JASMANI BAGIJAMAAH CALON HAJI DI KABUPATEN WONOGIRI 2017

10

PAMERAN OLAHRAGA (PAMOR) SEBAGAIWAHANA PEMBUDAYAAN OLAHRAGA DANSOSIALISASI ASEAN GAMES KE-XVIII

2018

11BIMBINGAN TEKNIS KESEHATAN DANKEBUGARAN JASMANI BAGI KOMUNITAS SENAMLANSIA DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA

2018

12Coaching Clinic Futsal bagi Guru Penjas di KabupatenWonogiri

2019

52

G. KEGIATAN SEMINAR/LOKAKARYA YANG RELEVAN DENGAN BIDANGILMU

No. Judul Tahun Tempat/Penerbit

1Karakteristik Lactate Treshold Atlet TaekwondoDIY During Competition

2013Proceding Seminar NasionalPOMNAS DIY

2Breathing Exercise untuk meningkatkan kapasitasvitas paru

2013Proceding Seminar NasionalPOMNAS DIY

3Analisis Gerak Teknik Tendangan Depan AtletPencak silat PPLM DIY

2014Proceding Seminar NasionalPascasarjana UNY

4Karakteristik Lactate Threshold pada AtletTaekwondo DIY During Competition

2014 Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora

5 Uji relevansi dan konsep TKJI 2015Jurnal Pendidikan JasmaniIndonesia (JPJI)

6Pengaruh latihan beban dan kekuatan ototterhadap hypertrophy otot dan ketebalan lemak 2016

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jolahraga/article/view/8131>.

doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v4i1.8131.

7Pengembangan modul pembelajaran perilakuhidup bersih dan sehat pada taman kanak-kanak 2017

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jolahraga/article/view/12807

http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jk.v5i1.12807

8The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen and ActiveRecovery on Lactate Removal and Fatigue Index 2018

Sport Mont 2018, 16(3), 15-18 |DOI: 10.26773/smj.181003

9Reduction of LDL Cholesterol through MICTand HIIT in Rats 2018

https://doi.org/10.2991/yishpess-cois-18.2018.3

2nd Yogyakarta InternationalSeminar on Health, PhysicalEducation, and Sport Science(YISHPESS 2018) and 1stConference onInterdisciplinary Approachin Sports (CoIS 2018)

10Football Skills: Training Methods and MotorEducability 2018


53


11

Mood State Profile as Overtraining Predictors:Considering Gender and Two Different ClassTypes 2018



12

Measurement of The Muscle Fitness Level of 9-12 Years Old Badminton Players with TheKraus Weber Method 2018



13Pengembangan model aquarobic exercise untukpembakaran lemak pada overweight 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v0i0.8560

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jolahraga/article/view/8560

14.

Adaptation to the levels of MDA and SODEnzyme Activity of MICT and HIIT Exercise OnWistar 2019

https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icssh-18/55914050

15Prinsip-Prinsip Biomekanika Kualitatif: UpayaMenjembatani Teori dan Aplikasi dalam SportScience

2019

Media Ilmu KeolahragaanIndonesia Volume 9. Nomor2. Edisi Desember 2019https://doi.org/10.15294/miki.v9i2.17757

54

H. TUGAS TAMBAHAN YANG DIPEGANGNo Tugas Tambahan Tahun1 Ketua Pusat Studi Olahraga LPPM UNY 2015-20192 Pengembang Prodi S2 IK PPs UNY 20143 Sekertaris Redaksi Jurnal Keolahragaan PPs UNY 2016-

sekarang4 Dewan Redaksi Jurnal Medikora FIK 2005-

sekarang5 Pengurus Pengda TI DIY 2013-20176 Pengurus KONI Kab Wonogiri 2019-

Yogyakarta, Februari 2020Mengetahui,

Dr. Widiyanto, M.Kes.NIP. 19820605 200501 1 002

55

Attachment 5. Surat Keterangan dari ketua jurusan/Prodi tentang keterlibatanmahasiswa dalam penelitian

SURAT KETERANGAN KETERLIBATAN MAHASISWA

Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:

Nama : Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes.

NIP : 196108161988031003

Fak /Jur / Prodi : FIK/IKOR/IKOR

Jabatan Struktural : Kajur/Kaprodi S2 IK PPs

Dengan ini menerangkan bahwa :

No. Nama NIM Prodi

1. Carles Nyoman Wali 19711251050 S2 IK PPs

2. Era Pratiwi 19711251071 S2 IK PPs

3. Doni Pranata 19711251023 S2 IK PPs

nama-nama tersebut di atas ini adalah benar-benar masih tercatat sebagai mahasiswa

aktif di Prodi S2 IK PPs UNY

Demikian surat keterangan ini dibuat untuk digunakan sebagaimana mestinya.

Yogyakarta, 20 April 2020Kaprodi S2 IK PPs UNY

Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes.NIP 196108161988031003

56

Attachment 6. Instrument

Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)(WHO, 2012)

Nama :

HariSenin Selasa Rabu Kamis Jum’at Sabtu Minggu

Jenis Aktivitas Jenis Kegiatan Contoh AktivitasAktivitas ringan 75% dari waktu digunakan

untuk duduk atau berdiri25% untuk kegiatan berpindah

Duduk, berdiri, mencuci piring, memasak,menyetrika, bermain musik, menonton tv,mengemudikan kendaraan, berjalan perlahan dll.

Aktivitas sedang 40% dari waktu digunakanuntuk duduk atau berdiri60% untuk kegiatan kerja.

Mengepel lantai, mencuci mobil, berkebun,bersepeda santai, berjalan sedang-cepat, bowling,golf, berkuda, bermain tenis meja, berenang, voli dll.

Aktivitas berat 25% dari waktu digunakanuntuk duduk atau berdiri75% untuk kegiatan kerja.

Membawa barang berat, berkebun, bersepeda (16-22km/jam), bermain sepak bola, bermain basket,gym/angkat berat, berlari dll.

Aktivitas Fisik

Kode

Aktivitas Saat Belajar/Bekerja

(Aktivitas termasuk kegiatan belajar, latihan, aktivitas rumah tangga, dll).

Pertanyaan Jawaban

P1 Apakah aktivitas sehari- hari Anda, termasukaktivitas berat (seperti membawa beban berat,menggali atau pekerjaan konstruksi lain)?

1. Ya

2. Tidak(langsung ke P4)

P2 Berapa hari dalam seminggu Anda melakukanaktivitas berat? Hari …

Tgl Bln Thn

57

P3 Berapa lama dalam sehari biasanya Andamelakukan aktivitas berat?

Jam ...

Menit …

P4 Apakah aktivitas sehari-hari Anda termasukaktivitas sedang yang menyebabkanpeningkatan nafas dan denyut nadi, sepertimengangkat beban ringan dan jalan sedang(minimal 10 menit secara kontinyu)?

1. Ya


P5 Berapa hari dalam seminggu Anda melakukanaktivitas sedang?

Hari …

P6 Berapa lama dalam sehari biasanya Andamelakukan aktivitas sedang?

Jam …

Menit ...

Perjalanan ke dan dari Tempat Aktivitas

(Perjalanan ke tempat aktivtias, berbelanja, beribadah diluar, dll)

P7 Apakah Anda berjalan kaki atau bersepedauntuk pergi ke suatu tempat minimal 10 menitkontinyu?

1. Ya


P8 Berapa hari dalam seminggu Anda berjalankaki atau bersepeda untuk pergi ke suatutempat?

Hari …

P9 Berapa lama dalam sehari biasanya Andaberjalan kaki atau bersepeda untuk pergi kesuatu tempat?

Jam ...

Menit ...

58

Aktivitas Rekreasi (Olaraga, fitnes, dan rekreasi lainnya)

P10 Apakah Anda melakukan olahraga, fitnes, ataurekreasi yang berat seperti lari, sepak bolaatau rekreasi lainnya yang mengakibatkanpeningkatan nafas dan denyut nadi secara besar(minimal dalam 10 menit secara kontinyu)?

1. Ya


P11 Berapa hari dalam seminggu biasanya andamelakukan olahraga, fitness, atau rekreasi yangtergolong berat?

Hari ...

P12 Berapa lama dalam sehari biasanya andamelakukan olahraga, fitness, atau rekreasi yangtergolong berat?

Jam ...

Menit ...

P13 Apakah Anda melakukan olahraga, fitness, ataurekreasi yang tergolong sedang seperti berjalancepat, bersepeda, berenang, voli yangmengakibatkan peningkatan nafas dan denyutnadi (minimal dalam 10 menit secara kontinyu)?

1. Ya


P14 Berapa hari dalam seminggu biasanya andamelakukan olahraga, fitnes, atau rekreasilainnya yang tergolong sedang?

Hari …

P15 Berapa lama dalam sehari biasanya andamelakukan olahraga, fitness, atau rekreasi yangtergolong sedang?

Jam ...

Menit ...

Aktivitas Menetap (Sedentary Behavior)

Aktivitas yang tidak memerlukan banyak gerak seperti duduk saat bekerja, duduk saat dikendaraan, menonton televisi, atau berbaring, KECUALI tidur.

P16 Berapa lama Anda duduk atau berbaring dalamsehari?

Jam ...

Menit ...

59

Petugas Pemeriksa

(.......................................)

60

Interprestasi GPAQ

Penghitungan Total Aktivitas FisikUntuk mengetahui total aktivitas fisik digunakan rumus sebagai berikut:

Total Aktivitas Fisik MET menit/minggu = [(P2 x P3 x 8) + (P5 xP6 x 4) + (P8 x P9 x 4) + (P11 x P12 x 8) + (P14 x P15 x 4)]

Sumber: (WHO, 2012).

Penilaian Total Aktivitas FisikNilai total aktivitas fisik (MET menit/minggu) dikategorikan ke dalam 3 tingkatsebagai berikut:

MET menit/minggu Katagori

≥ 3000 Tinggi

≥ 600-3000 Sedang

< 600 Rendah

Sumber: (WHO, 2012).

61

Attachment 7.Join Research

KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN

UNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA PASCASARJANA

Jalan Colombo Nomor 1 Yogyakarta 55281

Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326

Laman: pps.uny.ac.id Email: [email protected], [email protected]

BERITA ACARA

PELAKSANAAN SEMINAR PROPOSAL PENELITIAN

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL

TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Istanto Wahyu Jatmiko

Judul Penelitian : Teachers’ Professional Development for Enhancing Electrical Vocational

Competencies in Industrial Revolution Era 4.0

Pelaksanaan

Hari , tanggal : Jumat, 22 Mei 2020

Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

1. di bacground dan di tujuan penelitian belum ada yg menyentuh peningkatan kompetensi

elektro sbgmn tertulis di judul

2. Di literatur review juga belum ada pembahasan ttg hal tsb.

3. Peneliti partner SUDAH ditulis di cover

4. Nama anggota peneliti perlu di cantumkan di lembar pengesahan

5. surat keterangan kesepakatan kerjasama dg peneliti partner SUDAH ada.

6. Target luaran penelitian belum ada (di proposal belum ditulis)

7. Rancangan instrumen sudah baik

Pembahas

Prof. Herman Dwi Suryono, Ph.D.

mailto:[email protected]




Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Ratna Wardhani, M.T.

Judul Penelitian : An Authentic Learning Approach to Assist The Computational Thinking in

Mathematics Learning for Elementary School

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

1. Di bab 3 termasuk di abstrak perlu ditunjukkan bahwa penelitian berlangsung di indonesia

dan taiwan

2. Di abstrak perlu disinggung terkait metode penelitiannya

3. Nama anggota peneliti perlu di cantumkan di lembar pengesahan

4. hasil turnitin 48%

5. bab 3 sebaiknya dilengkapi rancangan instrumen penel



Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Moch. Bruri Triyono, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Dampak Covid 19 terhadap pembelajaran On Line Bidang Vokasional di

UNY Yogyakarta dan NUTE Hanoi

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

1. penelitian KLN mestinya ditulis dlm bhs Inggris

2. pendahuluan terlalu banyak, tidak sebanding dg studi pustaka

3. variabel penelitian perlu dibahas lebih dalam


5. Peneliti partner sebaiknya ditulis di cover

6. Nama peneliti di cover tdk singkron dg yg di personalia

7. Daftar pustaka masih sedikit dan ditulis belum urut abjad

8. Tidak singkron sitasi dlm teks dengan daftar pustaka

9. surat keterangan kesepakatan kerjasama dg peneliti partner perlu disertakan

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2019

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Putu, Sudira

Judul Penelitian : Identification of Core Competencies in Vocational Learning for Industry 4.0

in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

1. Peneliti partner sebaiknya ditulis di cover

2. Struktur proposal sudah baik


4. di dalam bab 2 perlu dibuat sub-sub judul sesuai dengan pokok bahasan nya

5. bab 3 perlu lebih detil dan dilengkapi rancangan instrumen penel

6. dalam personalia perlu dicantumkan nama peneliti partner

7. Tidak singkron sitasi dlm teks dengan daftar pustaka

8. surat keterangan kesepakatan kerjasama dg peneliti partner belum ada (ttd)

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2019

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Bernadus Sentot Wijanarko, M.T.

Judul Penelitian : Relevancy of TVET Curriculum and Industry Work Standard in Indonesia

and Malaysia

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

1. Surat keterangan kesepakatan kerjasama dg peneliti partner SUDAH ada.


3. Hasil turnitin 30%


Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Kokom Komariah

Judul Penelitian : Antecedent Factors Of Traditional Food Consumption Intention At The

Tourism Destination: A Comparative Study Of Malaysian And Indonesian

Tourists

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :





Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Badrun Kartowagiran, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Evaluation Of Learning In Elementary School: Integration Of Character

Values In Students

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

1. Perlu dijelaskan di bacground, maksudnya integrasi nilai karakter tsb diinetegrasikan dengan

apa

2. Target luaran penelitian belum ada

3. Surat keterangan kesepakatan kerjasama dg peneliti partner SUDAH ada.


Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Suyanta

Judul Penelitian : DEVELOPMENT OF VIRTUAL LABS INCORPORATING WITH GAME

BASED LEARNING ON ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY FOR SECONDARY

SCHOOL

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Dalam judul harus ada kemampuan peserta didik yang mau ditingkatkan

2. Dalam capaian hasil belajar harus jelas kompetensi yang akan dikemnbangkan (ini juga otomatis

sesuai kemampuan yang ditungkatkan di dalam judul

3. Jika menggunakan ADDIE maka analisis daya sesuaikan dengan tiap tahapan ADDIE

4. Uji kenornalan distribusi populasi untuk persyaratan keparametrikan tidak perlu dilakukan sesuai

pendapat pakar Matematika Prof. IGN Agung, M.Sc,Ph.D.

Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Bambang Subali





Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Paidi, M.Si.

Judul Penelitian : DEVELOPMENT OF FREE INQUIRY-BASED BLENDED LEARNING

MODEL TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LEARNING OF BIOLOGY

EDUCATION MAGISTER STUDY PROGRAM IN INDONESIA AND

MALAYSIA

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Inquiry kurang cocok untuk mata kuliah Pendidikan Biologi, sehingga dalam judul haarus jelas yang

ditingkatkan adalah Quality Learning of Biological Subject on the Biology Educational Magister

Study Program

2. Quality learning-nya apa tidak perlu diekspos sesuai dengan variable yang dituju?

3. Dalam metode penelitian harus jelas bagaimana sintak inquiry ketika penbelajaran berbasis online

4. Analisis yang parsial perlu dikemukakan jika pretes tidak signifikan menggunakan uji t-independen

dan jika sebaliknya signifikan harus pakai analisis kovariansi.

5. Uji kenornalan distribusi populasi untuk persyaratan keparametrikan tidak perlu dilakukan sesuai

pendapat pakar Matematika Prof. IGN Agung, M.Sc,Ph.D.

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr.rernat Senam

Judul Penelitian : DEVELOPMENT OF CHEMISTRY PRACTICAL SKILL ASSESSMENT

MODELS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Jikalau mungkin dalam judul bukan untuk mengembangkan CHEMISTRY PRACTICAL SKILL

ASSESSMENT namun CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE ASESSMENT (paper and pencil

performance test, identification test, simulation test, and work sample test) atau mau ke HOLISTIC

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT (menyangkut seluruh aspek kognitif, afektif, psikomotor)

karena sebenarnya secara konseptual tidak ada pemisahan antara teori dan praktik dalam

pembelajaran kimia, apa lagi di SMA.

2. Metode R&D dengan 10 taahapan apa benar-benar bisa dipenuhi, lebih baik mengambil metode

penelitian pengembangan menurut Plomp atau ADDIE atau DDR yang lebih pendek tahapannya.

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Edi Istyono

Judul Penelitian : EVALUATION OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ' CHARACTER

ASSESSMENT IN LEARNING IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

Perlu dipertegas bahwa yang mau diteliti hanya evaluasi untuk melihat antara idealisme dan

kenyataan sebagai discrepancy dari masing-masing negara karena rumusan karakter yang mau diukur

boleh jadi definisi operasional variable/kompetensi yang dituju apakah sama dimensi dan

indikatornya

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Hari Sutrisno

Judul Penelitian : EVALUATION OF CHEMICAL REPRESENTATIONS IN SENIOR HIGH

SCHOOL TEXTBOOKS IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Perlu dipertegas bahwa yang mau dianalisis adalah representasi apa? Representasi konsep? Karena

kata “representasi” belum spesifik. Kemudia setelah dibuat divinisi operasionalnya akan terlihat

Berapa dimensi, dan masing-masing dimensi Berapa indicator, sehingga rumusan masalah yang

diteliti bukan poin-poin sampai 9 poin tidak jelas mana variabel, dimensi, dan indikatornya.

2. Metodenya mohon ditulis menggunakan “content analysis” dengan teknik sampling mengikuti

metodenya.

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Heru Kuswanto

Judul Penelitian : BLENDED LEARNING EFFECTIVITY TO ENHANCE CREATIVITY AND

GRAPHIC REPERESENTATION ABILITY OF PHYSICS EDUCATION

STUDENTS

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Blended learning dengan model pembelajaran apa yang dipilih agar jelas aktifitas pembelajarannya

baik saat tatap muka maupun saat online.

2. Metode tidak perlu disebut dengan R&D tetapi dilanjut dengan menyebut “with the spiral model as

proposed by Cennamo and Kalk (2005: 6). This spiral model or known as the 5 D”. Jadi cukup ditulis

bahwaa metode yang digunakan adalah “spiral 5D model development research from Cennamo &

Kalk”.

3. Analisis data seharusnya dimasukkan dalam setiap tahapan.

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Wahyu Setyaningrum, S.Pd, M.Pd., Ph.D.

Judul Penelitian : IMPLEMENTING AUGMENTED REALITY INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA

BASED ON STEM IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Kemampuan yang akan ditingkatkan (student’s HOT) mohon dimasukkan di dalam judul karena itu

sebagai variabel dependennya.

2. Pada teknik analisis tidak perlu melakukan uji normalitas distribusi populasi sesuai dengan saran ahli

statististika UI Prof. IGN Agung, Ph.D.

3. Uji parsialnya mestinya dibandingkan antara kemampuan parsial HOT (kemampuan analisis,

kemampuan evaluasi, kemampuan mengreasi) antara kelompokm eksperimen dan kelompok kontrol,

bukan hanya menguji besarnya “gain” karena itu tidak menggambarkan keefektifan

intervensi/threatment.

Pembahas



KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAANUNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA

PASCASARJANAJalan Colombo Nomor 1 Yogyakarta 55281

Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326Laman: pps.uny.ac.id Email: [email protected], [email protected]

BERITA ACARAPELAKSANAAN SEMINAR PROPOSAL PENELITIAN

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONALTAHUN 2019

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes.Judul Penelitian : STUDY OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY DURING PANDEMIC CORONAVIRUS

DISEASE (COVID-19) IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA

PelaksanaanHari , tanggal : Jumat, 22 Mei 2020Tempat : On-linePeserta yang hadirPembahas : 2 orangSaran-saran :

1. Sangat relevan dan bermanfaat, terkait dengan kondisi tanah air saat ini dan ke depan.2. Bagaimana perbedaan konseptual dalam hal aktivitas fisik antara Periode Covid-19 dan tidak Covid ?3. Abstrak sebaiknya fokus pada 3 hal yaitu: Tujuan, Cara/metode Penelitian, dan hasil yang

diharapkan.4. Terkait Metode:

Apakah hanya questionaire Perlu penjelasan terkait proses validasi instrumen Apakah tidak ada proses verifikasi melalui observasi, meskipun secara sampling. Atau dengan cara bagaimana peneliti meyakini validitas informasi data.

5. Perlu dipertimbangkan kembali Rincian Pembiayaan, agar lebih sesuai dengan kondisi PSBB saat ini.

Mohon di catat pesan Bapak Wadir-1, untuk para peneliti agar benar-benar mempertimbangkan beberapa halberikut:

1. Time-line penelitian khususnya terkait dengan situasi Pandemi Covid-192. Luaran Jurnal adalah Journal Internasional3. Perlu segera menindaklanjuti persiapan penelitian dengan melakukan kontak-kontak dengan pihak

institusi serta peneliti mitra di luar negeri.

Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Mukminan






Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Siswantoyo, S.Pd.,M.Kes.Judul Penelitian : INNOVATION “SPORT COACHING GAMES” OF THE BASIC MOVEMENT

TRAINING (JUMP-PIVOT-BALANCE) FOR CHILDRREN 6-9 YEARS OLDBASE ON HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILL (HOTS) AND CGFU-PM515CONCEPT IN 21ST CENTURY EDUCATIONS

PelaksanaanHari , tanggal : Jumat, 22 Mei 2020Tempat : On-line

Peserta yang hadirPembahas : 2 orangSaran-saran :

1. Sangat inspiratif dan inovatif, mendukung paradigma atau prinsip pembelajaran HOTS.2. R n D, Ok.3. Hasil yang diharapkan dari penelitian INNOVATION “SPORT COACHING GAMES” ini adalah

berupa produk/hasil pengembangan. Bagaimana kalau Judulnya eksplisit, yaitu:“PENGEMBANGAN “SPORT COACHING GAMES” ...................................... ..

4. Perlu kejelasan terkait validasi instrumen Yang lain-lain, Ok.5. Perlu pencermatan kembali Rincian Pembiayaan, agar lebih sesuai dengan kondisi PSBB saat ini.




Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Mukminan






Ketua Peneliti : Prof. DarmiyatiZuchdi, MS.,Ed.D./Judul Penelitian : Developing A Culture Based Indonesian Language For Others Speakers (Bipa)

Texbook For Academic Purpose (A Collaborative Research Between YogyakartaState Univetsity And Yala Rajabath University)



1. Penelitian ini sangat relevan dan mendukung pengenalan bahasa Indonesia untuk untuk orang-orangasing.

2. Metode/Teknik R&D sudah sesuai3. Hati-hati penggunaan kata akan, ... akan, ... (will, will, ...) itu jangan sampai lupa mengedit waktu

menulis laporan penelitian atau ubah saja dari sekarang, langsung ke objekny.4. Diawali dengan FGD, ... sudah Ok.5. Mengingat rencana Responden adalah Calon Mahasiswa, bagaimana secara teknis desain teknik

samplingnya.6. Perlu dipertimbangkan kembali Rincian Pembiayaan, agar lebih sesuai dengan kondisi PSBB saat ini.




Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Mukminan






Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Setyabudi Indartono, MM., Ph.D./Judul Penelitian : Comparative Study Of Mediation Of Communication Style On Theeffect Of The

Teaching Motivation, Workplace Ethics, Emotional Intelligence On The ReadingProficiency And Knowledge Sharing: Case Of Indonesia And Taiwan



1. Disiplin keilmuan yang didukung sebaiknya dalam konteks Pendidikan Ekonomi. Kaitannya denganReading Proficiency ini mengaitnya di mana, atau Reading Proficiency yang seperti apa, atau dalamkonteks yang bagaimana ?

2. Metode kombinasi antara penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif, Ok.3. Subjek penelitian/responden adalah mahasiswa Pasca, bagaimana dengan yang di Taiwan?4. Mohon diperjelas proses validasi instrumen5. Referensi agar dimenonjolkan yang memang sangat relevan/terkait langsung dengan tema penelitian.6. Perlu diperhitungkan kembali Rincian Pembiayaan, agar lebih sesuai dengan kondisi PSBB saat ini.




Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Mukminan






Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Drs. Ajat Sudrajat, M.Ag.Judul Penelitian : Portraying Democracy In Asia: The Comparative Study Of The Social Science

Textbooks At The Junior High School In Indonesia And The PhilippinesPelaksanaanHari , tanggal : Jumat, 22 Mei 2020Tempat : On-line


1. Inspiratif, mendukung program pemerintah terkait dengan Pengembangan BTP (Buku TeksPelajaran) yang digalakkan pemerintah, termasik Buku Teks Pelajaran IPS SMP.

2. Perlu adanya equivalensi (padanan atau persamaan) maksud dan tujuan terkait pembelajaran subyekIlmu Pengetahuan Sosial, terutama untuk sekolah tingkat menengah (SMP dan SMA), cukup SMPsaja atau SMP dan SD, sebab di SMA tidak dikenal IPS, tetapi Ilmu Sosial (IS) .

3. Metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan grounded riset, akan lebih baik jika dikombinasi denganmetode Analisis konten dan dilengkapi dengan FGD. Jadi Kombinasi (Mix)




Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Mukminan






Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Suharno, M.Si.Judul Penelitian : Comparison Of Ethnic Conflict Resolution Models In Indonesia And Azerbaijan



1. Hasil penelitian ini sangat penting dan mendukung program pemerintah terkait PenguatanPendidikan Karakter (PPK)

2. metode kualitatif-naturalistik dengan pendekatan studi kasus, dilengkapi dengan berbagai teknikpengumpulan data seperti teknik wawancara mendalam, dokumentasi, observasi, digabung denganFGD sudah sesuai

3. Pembahasan perlu diperkuat dengan Journals internasional bereputasi4. Novelti-nya adalah berupa model, maka sebaiknya penelitiannya adalah pengembangan5. Lngkah-langkah terkait dengan validitas instrumen agar diperjelas




Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Mukminan






Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Aman, M.Pd.Judul Penelitian : Comparative Study Multicultural Education Model In Uny Indonesia And Punjabi

University Patiala India



1. Sangat mendukung program nasional/pemerintah terkait PPK (Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter)2. Bagaimana mengetaui/mengukiur efektivitas model pendidikan multicultural Kualitatif secara

teknis perlu kejelasan.3. Sumber datanya apakah cukup dengan hanya dosen4. Bagaimana dengan proses validasi instrumen yang berupa kuesioner5. Karena penelitian ini adalah penelitian Kerjasana Internasional, mohon agar diperkuat textbook

tentang Qualitative Research.6. Pembahasan perlu diperkuat dengan Journal internasional bereputasi




Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Mukminan




Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Achmad Dardiri, M.Hum.

Judul Penelitian : Patriotisme Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah di Indonesia dan Malaysia

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

1. Perbaikan abstrak diawali dengan statemen problematik , tujuan penelitian dst.

2. Latar belakang masalah perlu ditata ulang narasi nya agar alur mudah dipahami , kuat kan sense of

probelamtic dan sense of urgeny terkait dengan tujuan penelitian.

3. Argumentatif pada masing-masing varibel perlu dinarasikan dalam latar belakang masalah

4. Alasan melakukan studi komparatif dengan Malayisa perlu dijelaskan dari aspek perbedaan atau

persamaan konteksnya sehingga menarik untuk dikaji dalam riset antar negara.

5. Metode penelitian perlu ditambahkan definisi oeprasional dan indikator serta jumlah item pertenyaan

penelitian pada masing-masing variabel.

6. Sebaiknya proposal ditulis dalam bahasa Inggris.

Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum.





Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Yoyon Suryono, MS.

Judul Penelitian : Parenting Model Of Early Childhood To Improve Digital Media And Physical

Literacy In Harmony

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : Room 2: https://meet.google.com/ryb-mhbh-tbo

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Latar belakang masalah perlu ditambahkan alasan studi kompratif dengan Singapura dan Maalysia.

2. Berikan narasi yang menguatkan asumsi peneliti bahwa model yang sudah ada belum efektif

digunakan untuk pendidikan anak usia dini pada latar belakang masalah.

3. Tambahkan kajian jurnal yang relevan dengan tujuan penelitian terkait dengan literasi pada anak usia

dini.

4. Jelaskan konsep inovasi model parenting yang akan dikembangkan dari hasil penelitian ini,

5. Sebaiknya ada kuestioner awal yang dapat digunakan untuk menggali data awal dari dua negara

sebagai landasan konseptual untuk pengembangan model.

6. Tahapan dalam “R&D” mohon dijelaskan langkah-langkah lebih kongkrit, sehingga capain pada

setiap tahap penelitian jelas.

Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum.





Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Muhammad Nur Wangid, M.Si.

Judul Penelitian : Motivation, Self-Efficay And Perception: Comparative Study On Pre-Service

Teacher In Indonesia And Taiwan

Pelaksanaan



Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Latar belakang perlu dikuatkan “statement of problematic” pentingnya riset ini

2. Latar belakang perlu ditambahkan tujuan melakukan komparasi dengan Taiwan dari aspek kesamaan

/perbedaan anatar dua neagara tersebut.

3. Pada akhir narasi latar belakang bisa dikuatkan pentingnya riset dengan piliha tiga variabel teb.bagi

perbaikan kualita pendidikan di Indonesia.

4. Rumusan masalah diperbaiki : Adakah perbedaan….dst.

5. Kajian pustaka bisa ditambahkan teori yang relevan, dan pada akhirnya narasi dari masing-masing

aspek bisa dibangun konseptualisasi yang mendasari tujuan penelitian ini

6. Tambakan hipotesis kerja agar jelas dalam melakukan analisis data, karena digunakan ANOVA, jika

dicoba analisis data dengan CFA akan lebih menarik hasilnya untuk ditulis dalam jurnal scopus.

7. Instumen penelitian perlu dijelaskan lebih detail dari aspek definisi operasional, indikator dan jumlah

item pertanyaan pada masing-masing variable.

Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum





Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Sugiyono, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Character Education Management Models In Indonesia and India: Comparative

Study At UNY And Lr Dav College Jagraon India

Pelaksanaan



Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Pada metode penelitian perlu dijelaskan pentingnya mengggunakan “mix-method” dalam studi

kompataif antara Indonesia dan India.

2. Penelitian ini akan menarik jika sampai pada pengembangan model yang tidak hanya terbatas pada

konsep, tetapi pada tataran aplikasinya.

Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum, M.Pd.





Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Lantip Diat Prasojo, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Access To Information and Communication Technology For Lecturers In

Universities In Indonesia

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran : Room 2: https://meet.google.com/ryb-mhbh-tbo

1. Latar belakang masalah tambahkan statement of problematif dan state of urgency.

2. Latar belakang tambahkan sebagai riet comparative dengan Malaysia dengan memberikan

argumentatifnya, dari aspek perbedaan dan persamaan terkait dengan tujuan penelitian.

3. Rumusan masalah perlu diperbaiki agar meggambarkan sebagai riset kerjasama antara negara.

4. Definisi operasional dari masing-masing variabel dan indikator diperjelas terkait dengan item

peratanyaan yang melandasi kuestioner.

5. Tambahkan hipotesi kerja yang akan dibuktikan dalam analisis data statistic

6. Analisis data diperjelas sesuai dengan tujuan penelitian.

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Moh Farozin, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Student’s Abilities to Create Guidance and Counseling Program in Indonesia and

Malaysia

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran : Room 2: https://meet.google.com/ryb-mhbh-tbo

1. Latar belakang masalah bisa dikuatkan “sense of problematik” dan “sense of urgency”

2. Latar belakang masalah perlu dimarasikan melakukan komparasi dengan Malaysia dari aspek

perbedaan maupun persamaan terkait dnegan tujuan penelitian .

3. Kajian pustaka bisa ditambahkan referensi jurnal yang relevan dengan fokus penelitian.

4. Metode penelitian , perlu dijabarkan defenisi oeprasional yang terkait dengan indikator untuk

mengembangkan kuestioner, dan dijelakan dengan kisi-kisi pertanyaan penelitian.

5. Analisis data sebaiknya jangan hanya deskripsi saja, sebaiknya dengan uji beda , sehingga perlu

dibuat hipotesis.

6. Sebaiknya proposal ditulis dengan bahasa Inggris.

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Suparno, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Comparative Education System for Early Childhood Academic Fields in Indonesia

and Malaysia

Pelaksanaan



Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Latar belakang masalah pelru ditambahkan statement of problematic dan statement of urgency.

2. Latar belakang perlu ditambahkan narasi pentingnya melakukan studi komparatif dengan Malaysia

dari aspek perbedaan maupun persamaannya dalam kontek tujuan penelitian.

3. Kajian pustaka bisa ditambahkan narasi bangunan konseptual yang melandasi tujuan penelitian.

4. Pengembangan instrument perlu ditambahkan definisi operasional, indikator yang melandasi

pembuatan kuestioner penelitian. (item pertanyaan)

5. Jiak perbandingan antar dua negara sebaiknya dibangun hipotesis kerja riset.

6. Untuk analisis data sebaiknya dirancangan dnegan uji beda (Anova/CFA), mohon disesuaikan

dengan tujuan penelitian.

Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum .





Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : . Dr. Ali Muhtadi, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Comparative Study On The Implementation Of Online Learning Model In UNY

Indonesia And UKM Malaysia

Pelaksanaan



Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Perbaiki narasi dalam abstrak, awali dengan statemen problematik, kemudian dilanjut dengan tujuan

penelitian dst.

2. Rumusan masalah dipertimbangkan kata “model”, karena data yang digali masih dalam tataran

menggali informasi proses pembelajaran di era pandemic covid-10 secara online.

3. Jika dikaitkan dengan model ada kecenderungan bahwa kedua cenderung mempunyai model yang

sama dan bisa jadi sedangn mencari model yang tepat .

4. Argumentatif perlu dipertajam untuk menilai implementasi model, karean yang diperbandingkan

kemungkinan model tidak sama.

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Adi Cilik Pierewan, Ph.D

Judul Penelitian : Smoking and mental health in Indonesia and the United States

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : : Room 2: https://meet.google.com/ryb-mhbh-tbo

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

1. Latar belakang masih perlu ditambahkan statemen yang menguatkan pentingnya melakukan studi

komparative dengan USA, misalnya persamaan dan perbedaannya sehingga fenomena kedu negara

sangat menarik diteliti.

2. Statement of urgency antara dua variabel perlu ditambahkan dalam later belakang masalah, kaena

dampak rokok sangat komplek, jadi pilihan variabel “mental health” dikuatkan dalam kontek

masyarakat Indonesia.

3. Manaaf apa dengan melakukan studi kompataive perlu dijelaskan .

4. Kaijian pustaka masih perlu ditambahkan terkait dengan perilaku , “mental healt” . demikian untuk

dasar pengembangkan instrument masih belum dijelaskan dalam proposal.

5. Jabaran variabel, definisi operasional dan item pertanyaan mohon ditambahkan . sehingga lebih jelas

bangunan konsepnya.

6. Pilihan metode is Oke, perlu diperjelas argumentatif.

7. Persyaratan adminisrasi mohon dilengkapi sesuai dengan buku panduan.

8. Luaran apa yang akan dihasilkan dalam penelitian mohon dituliskan dengan jelas. .

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Nur Azizah, Ph.D.

Judul Penelitian : Teacher perception of self-determination

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : : Room 2: https://meet.google.com/ryb-mhbh-tbo

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : 2 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Latar belakang masalah perlu ditambahkan alasan melakukan studi comparative dengan Austalia.

Sedikit diungkap dari aspek perbedaan dan persamaan antar ke dua negara dalam penanangan

masalah siswa disablitas.

2. Perbaikan rumusan masalah menggambarkan sebagai studi komparatif.

3. Kajian pustaka cukup jelas.

4. Tambahkan hipotesis kerja dalam peneltian.

5. Metodologi penelitian, pengembangan instrument cukup jelas konsepnya.

6. Pesyaratan administrasi dan luaran penelitian sesuai dengan buku panduan.

Pembahas


Type text here





Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Anita Triastuti, Ph.D.

Judul Penelitian : Developing a Text based English Teaching and Learning Model

Informed by Principled Eclecticism

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

(1) untuk memberi bingkai pembelajaran teks yang paling ideal

(2) kenapa harus SMP dan SMA Peran dari tokoh Australia yang diajak kerjasama perlu ditonjolkan,

untuk apa ke depan setelah ditemukan model pembelajaran

(3) Research output-nya perlu dicantumkan

Pembahas

Prof. Dr. Suwardi Endraswara, M.Hum.





Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Dra. Kun Setyaning Astuti, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian :COMPARING ARTS EDUCATION CURRICULUM BETWEEN

INDONESIA AND THE PHILIPPINES

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

(1) Siapa tokoh dari Pilipina yang diajak kerjasama perlu disampaikan

(2) Perguruan tinggi apa, perlu dicantumkan bagian awal

(3) Kurikulum ideal seperti apa yang akan diraih

(4) Kurikulum jenjang apa

(5) Acuan tentang kurikulum seni blum Nampak

(6) Research output-nya perlu dicantumkan

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2019

Ketua Peneliti : Ashadi, Ed.D.

Judul Penelitian : Making Sense of Overseas Education Failures: A Narrative Study

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

(1) Penelitian ini memiliki kekuatan pada identifiksi sebab-sebab kegagalan

(2) Perlu ada kriteria kegagalan dan kesuksasan

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2019

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Dra. Widyastuti Purbani, M.A.

Judul Penelitian : THE USE OF CHIDREN'S LITERATURE IN LITERACY

EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN

INDONESIAN AND GERMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

(1) Perlu tinjau ulang urutan pertanyaan penelitian, sesuai proses serta urgensinya

(2) Masih perlu kemutakhiran pustaka, beberapa masih tahun 1990an

(3) Research output perlu juga tercantum

(4) Nalisis menggunakan apa

(5) Apakah Moleong tepat untuk reasearh sastra, setidaknya bidang pendidikan atau pembelajaran

sastra anak

Pembahas






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA



TAHUN 2019

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Pratomo Widodo

Judul Penelitian : Corpus-based Study of Utterances Used in Buddhism and Hinduism and Its

Implementation in the Cultural Guiding Technique Instructions for Tourism

Students in Indonesia and Thailand

Pelaksanaan


Tempat : -

Peserta yang hadir

Pembahas : orang

Saran-saran :

(1) Aka lebih bagus bila research problems terumuskan terpisah, agar lebih focus

(2) Kegunaan penelitin perlu juga tercantum secara jelas, agar kedua belah pihak memperoleh manfaat

penelitin

(3) Bagian bab III methodhology, mosok bagian sub A juga methodhology, mestinya tentang apa

missal paradigm research

(4) Reaearch output perlu juga tercantum secara jelas

Pembahas






BERITA ACARAPELAKSANAAN SEMINAR HASIL PENELITIAN KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL

TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Aman, M.Pd.Judul Penelitian : Comparative Study Multicultural Education Model In UNY Indonesia And Punjabi

University Patiala India

PelaksanaanHari , tanggal : Jumat, 20 November 2020Tempat : Daring Via Zoom

Dipimpin olehKetua sidang : dr. Novita Intan Arofah, Ph.D.Pembahas : Prof. Dr. Tomoliyus, M.S.

Peserta yang hadirPeserta seminar : 50 orangPembahas : 1 orangSaran-saran :

Mohon disusun rekomendasi dari hasil uji komparasi yang sudah dilakukanLuaran artikel berupa artikel utamanya dengan kerjasama penulisanLuaran diupayakan berupa buku yang di HKI kan

Pembahas Ketua Sidang,

Prof. Dr. Tomoliyus, M.S. dr. Novita Intan Arofah, Ph.D.




BERITA ACARA

PELAKSANAAN SEMINAR HASIL PENELITIAN KERJASAMA INTERNASIONALTAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Ajat Sudrajat, M.Ag.Judul Penelitian : Portraying Democracy in Asia: The Comparative Study of the Social Science

Textbooks at the Junior High School in Indonesia and the Philippines




Luaran berupa rekomendasi mohon diperjelasLuaran utama berupa artikel terindeks dan utamanya artikel kola







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Setyabudi Indartono, Ph.D.Judul Penelitian : Comparative study of mediation of communication style on the effect of the teaching

motivation, workplace ethics, Emotional Intelligence on the reading proficiency andknowledge sharing: case of Indonesia and Taiwan




Luaran utama yang perlu diupayakan artikel terindeks jurnal bereputasi atau buku yang bisa di HKI kanData dari Taiwan diperlukan supaya sesuai dengan judul







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Darmiyati Zuchdi, MS.,Ed.D.Judul Penelitian : Developing a Culture Based Indonesian Language for Others Speakers (BIPA)

Texbook for Academic Purpose (A Collaborative Research between YogyakartaState Univetsity and Yala Rajabath University)




Luaran yang diperlukan adalah artikel artikel terindeks jurnal bereputasi atau buku yang bisa di HKI kan







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Suharjana, M.Kes.Judul Penelitian : Study Of Physical Activity During Pandemic Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) In

Indonesia And Malaysia




Luaran berupa rekomendasi hasil penelitianLuaran berupa artikel terindeks dan perlu di follow upLuaran yang berupa buku buku dapat dipertimbangkan







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Siswantoyo, M.Kes.Judul Penelitian : Innovation “Sport Coaching Games” Of The Basic Movement Training (Jump-Pivot

Balance) For Childrren 6-9 Years Old Base On Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS)And CGFU-PM515 Concept In 21st Century Educations




Perlu dikembangkan pada cabang yang lain selanin atletik.Penilaian TGFU perlu ditegaskan







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Yoyon Suryono, MS.Judul Penelitian : Parenting Model Of Early Childhood To Improve Digital Media And Physical

Literacy In Harmony




Luaran rekomendasi berupa buku yang perlu dipatenkanMohon data perbandingan dari negara lain sesuai dengan rencana penelitian




UNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA

PASCASARJANA Jalan Colombo Nomor 1 Yogyakarta 55281

Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA

PELAKSANAAN SEMINAR HASIL PENELITIAN KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL

TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Kun Setyaning Astuti, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Comparing arts education curriculum between Indonesia and the Philippines

Pelaksanaan

Hari , tanggal : Jumat, 20 November 2020

Tempat : Daring Via Zoom

Dipimpin oleh

Ketua sidang : Dr. Taat Wulandari, M.Pd.

Pembahas : Prof. Dr. Suwardi, M.Hum.

Peserta yang hadir

Peserta seminar : 50 orang

Pembahas : 1 orang

Saran-saran :

1. apa yang ingin dicapai oleh masing-masing negara karena musik adalah masalah tentang keterampilan?

2. Indonesia mau mengikuti Philipina atau Indonesia akan berbeda dengan Philipina?

3. Apa tindak lanjut difokuskan Kembali?


Prof. Dr. Suwardi, M.Hum. Dr. Taat Wulandari, M.Pd.




Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA


TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Moch. Bruri triyono, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Dampak Covid-19 terhadap pembelajaran On Line Bidang Vokasional di UNY

Yogyakarta dan NUTE Hanoi

Pelaksanaan



Dipimpin oleh



Peserta yang hadir


Pembahas : 1 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Sudah baik sudah ada luarannya






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA


TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Widyastuti Purbani, M.A.

Judul Penelitian : The Use of Chidren Literature in Literacy Education: A Comparative Study between

Indonesian and German Elementary Schools

Pelaksanaan



Dipimpin oleh



Peserta yang hadir


Pembahas : 1 orang

Saran-saran :

1. perlu dijelaskan oleh peneliti Ketika ada dua negara yang literasinya berbeda. Sebagai orang Indonesia

apakah akan mengikuti mereka atau memfilter ?






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA


TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Anita Triastuti, Ph.D.

Judul Penelitian : Developing a Text-based English Teaching and Learning Model Informed by

Principled Eclecticism (Year 2 Study: Developing the Model the Evaluation Study)

Pelaksanaan



Dipimpin oleh



Peserta yang hadir


Pembahas : 1 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Belum difokuskan kerjasamanya dari awal






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA


TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Pratomo Widodo, M.Pd.

Judul Penelitian : Corpus-based Study of Utterances Used in Buddhism and Hinduism and Its

Implementation in the Cultural Guiding Technique Instructions for Tourism Students

in Indonesia and Thailand

Pelaksanaan



Dipimpin oleh



Peserta yang hadir


Pembahas : 1 orang

Saran-saran :

1. Perlu dipertimbangkan temuan kata-kata yang uni. Perlu ada rasional tentang kata-kata unik itu apa?

Contohnya kata enlightment, teachiong, dan sebagainya.

2. luaran hasil penelitian segera dipenuhi khususnya artikel






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA


TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Edi Istiyono, M.Si.

Judul Penelitian : Evaluation Of Elementary School Students Character Assessment In Learning In

Indonesia And Malaysia

Pelaksanaan



Dipimpin oleh



Peserta yang hadir


Pembahas : 1 orang

Saran-saran :

1. sudah baik






Telepon (0274) 550835, 550836 Fax. (0274) 520326


BERITA ACARA


TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Suharno, M.Si.

Judul Penelitian : Comparison Of Ethnic Conflict Resolution Models In Indonesia and Azerbaijan

Pelaksanaan



Dipimpin oleh



Peserta yang hadir


Pembahas : 1 orang

Saran-saran :

1. sebaiknya penelitian ditingkatkan penelitian di Sampit







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Iis Prasetyo, M.M.Judul Penelitian : Pemutakhiran Program Pendidikan Nonformal untuk Meningkatkan Literasi

Masyarakat di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0


Dipimpin olehKetua sidang : Erna Andriyanti, Ph.D.Pembahas : Prof. Pardjono, Ph.D.


1. Tidak ada saran


Prof. Pardjono, Ph.D. Erna Andriyanti, Ph.D.





TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Istanto Wahyu Djatmiko, M.Pd.Judul Penelitian : Teachers’ Professional Development for Enhancing Electrical Vocational

Competencies in Industrial Revolution Era 4.0




1. Data perlu dilengkapi beserta luarannya.2. Saran: Topik perlu dispesifikkan.3. Sampel 62: by desain atau jumlah maksimal yang diperoleh (non-probablity)? Perlu dijelaskan.4. Kesimpulan belum terlihat.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Ratna Wardani, M.T.Judul Penelitian : An Authentic Learning Approach to Assist The Computational Thinking in

Mathematics Learning for Elementary School




1. Model kerjasama yang bagus karena ada shared-funding dan perlu dicantumkan di laporan.2. Hasil perlu disampaikan ke Dikdasmen.3. Perlu diperjelas apakah yang mendesain hanya Prof Huang atau kolaboratif.4. Q3 perlu direformulasikan ulang.5. Di bagian implikasi perlu disampaikan implementasi model dalam pembelajaran luring.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Kokom Komariah, M.Pd.Judul Penelitian : Antecedent Factors Of Traditional Food Consumption Intention At The Tourism

Destination: A Comparative Study Of Malaysian And Indonesian Tourists




1. Sampling perlu diperjelas terkait dengan kemiripan kultur antara wisatawan Indonesia dan Malaysia.2. Non-probablity sampling karena tidak bisa menargetkan jumlah populasi.3. Cek Bahasa (masih Bahasa proposal)







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Bernardus Sentot Wijanarka, M.T.Judul Penelitian : Relevancy of TVET Curriculum and Industry Work Standard in Indonesia and

MalaysiaPelaksanaanHari , tanggal : Jumat, 20 November 2020Tempat : Daring Via Zoom



1. Perbandingan industri dan sekolah kurang pas sehingga perlu diperjelas relevansinya.2. Sistemnya yang perlu lebih disoroti (TVET setelah SMA) dan dielaborasi.3. Judulnya bisa disesuaikan.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Putu Sudira, MP.Judul Penelitian : Identification of Core Competencies in Vocational Learning for Industry 4.0 in

Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand




1. Definisi Core Skills?2.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Badrun Kartowagiran, M.Pd.Judul Penelitian : Evaluation Of Learning In Elementary School: Integration Of Character Values In

Students




1. Bagaimana kalau dilanjutkan menjadi explanatory untuk tahun depan.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Ashadi, Ed.D.Judul Penelitian : Making Sense of Overseas Education Failures: A Narrative Study




1. Tidak ada saran







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Suyanta, M.Si.Judul Penelitian : Development of virtual labs incorporating with game based learning on

electrical conductivity for secondary school


Dipimpin olehKetua sidang : Prof. Dr. Eli Rohaeti, M.Si.Pembahas : Prof. A.K. Prodjosantoso, Ph.D.


1. Penelitian sudah selesai, jurnal sudah didraft, seminar sudah diikuti, HKI sedang proses. Luaran sudah

cukup bagus.

2. Skim penelitian kerjasama perlu sharing dengan instansi mitra, paling tidak dalam bentuk publikasi

bersama

3. Isu penelitiannya apakah sudah berskala internasional?

4. Uji coba media dilakukan terhadap 10 siswa, ini sebagai kelemahan dari penelitian yang dilakukan

5. Perlu dirintis kerjasama lanjutan

6. Perlu dilakukan analisis secara deskriptif terhadap data keterbacaan produk dengan melibatkan peserta

didik untuk diwawancarai secara daring.


Prof. A.K. Prodjosantoso, Ph.D. Prof. Dr. Eli Rohaeti, M.Si.





TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Hari Sutrisno, M.Si.Judul Penelitian : Evaluation of Chemical Representations in Senior High School Textbooks In

Indonesia and Malaysia




1. Publikasi tidak harus menunggu penelitian selesai

2. Perlu dilakukan Focus Group Disscussion dengan mengundang mitra Kerjasama dari UPSI secara

online

3. Perlu pembahasan lebih lanjut terkait korelasi grade/kelas dengan komponen penilaian (C1 s/d C5)







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Wahyu Setyaningrum, Ph.D.Judul Penelitian : Implementing Augmented Reality Instructional Media Based on STEM in





1. Luaran sudah sesuai dengan target

2. Sudah bagus kerjasama yang dilakukan

3. Perlu dicek kembali cara pengukuran berbeda saat uji coba lapangan terhadap hasil yang diperoleh

4. Buku Panduan STEM-AR perlu dideskripsikan secara detail terkait STEM tersebut

5. Environment in STEM sebaiknya dikaitkan dengan Society 5.0 (dibahas dan diungkap dalam Laporan

dan Buku Panduan yang dibuat)







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Paidi, M.Si.Judul Penelitian : Development Of Free Inquiry-Based Blended Learning Model To Enhance

The Quality Of Learning Of Biology Education Magister Study Program InIndonesia And Malaysia




1. Perlu dibuat dan diajukan hak cipta tentang Lesson Plan yang dihasilkan, Student Worksheet, Buku

Panduan Pengembangan Model Free-Inquiry dalam Mata Kuliah yang dikembangkan, serta Instrumen

Penilaian yang digunakan dalam penelitian pengembangan model tersebut

2. Hasil uji coba model perkuliahan yang dikembangkan terkait semua variable terikat yang dipilih dapat

disusun menjadi beberapa artikel yang dikirim ke Jurnal Internasional.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. rer. nat. Senam, M.Si.Judul Penelitian : Development Of Chemistry Practical Skill Assessment Models For Senior

High School




1. Penelitian yang dilakukan merupakan pengembangan model penilaian practical skill sehingga perlu

disampaikan/dilaporkan model penilaian tersebut meliputi prosedur penilaian, instrumen penilaian,

dan teknik penilaian yang dapat dilakukan

2. Perlu dilakukan FGD dengan melibatkan mitra dari LN (UPSI) untuk membahas model penilaian yang

cocok untuk Indonesia-Malaysia

3. Luaran Hak Cipta berupa Buku Panduan Pengembangan Model Penilaian Practical Skill segera

disiapkan







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Heru Kuswanto, M.Si.Judul Penelitian : Blended Learning Effectivity To Enhance Creativity And Graphic

Representation Ability Of Physics Education Students




1. Perlu dibahas terkait kreativitas dan kemampuan representasi mahasiswa sebagai akibat dari beberapa

perlakuan yang diberikan

2. Studi efektivitas perlu dilaporkan dan dibahas

3. Target luaran artikel Jurnal Internasional dan Hak Cipta segera ditindaklanjuti







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Achmad Dardiri, M.Hum.Judul Penelitian : Patriotisme Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah di Indonesia dan Malaysia




1. Sudah kelihatan dan sesuai skim penelitian Kerjasama antara Indonesia dengan Malaysia, responden

yang terlibat serta topiknya kekinian

2. Mohon bisa dicermati terkait instrumen penilaian patriotisme dari Malaysia yang disesuaikan dengan

kondisi/terminologi di Indonesia

3. Mohon disiapkan luaran berupa Hak Cipta tentang Instrumen Penilaian Patriotisme

4. Perlu dikaji terkait hasil penelitian semua variable yang diteliti termasuk kategori sedang







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Muhammad Nur Wangid, M.Si.Judul Penelitian : Motivation, Self-Efficay And Perception: Comparative Study on Pre-Service

Teacher In Indonesia And TaiwanPelaksanaanHari, tanggal : Jumat, 20 November 2020Tempat : Daring Via Zoom

Dipimpin olehKetua sidang : Dr. Nani Ratnaningsih, M.P.Pembahas : Prof. Dr. C. Asri Budiningsih, M.Pd.


1. Penelitian menarik namun data yang diperoleh baru dari mahasiswa UNY.2. Wanita non eksak mempunyai motivasi dan self efikasi sbg guru lebih tinggi daripada

responden lain, mengapa? Perlu diskusi dan implikasi hasil penelitian ini.3. Responden terbanyak dari mhs semester 1 yg belum mempunyai prior knowledge terhadap

persepsi sbg guru. Data ini perlu diskusi dan implikasinya.


Prof. Dr. C. Asri Budiningsih, M.Pd. Dr. Nani Ratnaningsih, M.P.





TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Sugiyono, M.Pd.Judul Penelitian : Character Education Management Models in Indonesia and India:

Comparative Study At UNY And Lr Dav College Jagraon India

PelaksanaanHari, tanggal : Jumat, 20 November 2020Tempat : Daring Via Zoom



1. Masih perlu penyempurnaan penulisan pada bab IV.2. Temuan penelitian supaya konsisten dengan rumusan masalah penelitian.3. Perlu ada pembahasan terhadap temuan penelitian dari kedua lembaga pendidikan tersebut.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof .Dr. Lantip Diat Prasojo, M.PdJudul Penelitian : Access to Information and Communication Technology for Lecturers in

Universities in Indonesia




1. Penelitian kerja sama namun datanya dari dalam negeri saja.2. Jenis penelitian ini apa?3. Hasil penelitian berupa produk instrument untuk mengetahui motivasi dan skill ICT dosen di

perguruan tinggi?4. Jenis penelitian perlu dipertegas, apakah R&D atau apa karena tujuan penelitian

mengembangkan skala penilaian motivasi dan skill ICT yang valid dan reliabel.5. Implikasi penelitian seperti apa?6. Penggunaan media TIK tidak hanya untuk pembelajaran namun harus disesuaikan dengan

tujuan dan jenis pembelajaran, mahasiswa, materi eksak dan non eksak perlu dielaborasi dandibahas.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Moh Farozin, M.Pd.Judul Penelitian : The Effect of Psychoeducation Intervention Towards Psychological Well

Being Among Higher Education Students of Universiti Pendidikan SultanIdris (Upsi) And Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (Uny) in the New NormalEra”.




1. Ada perubahan judul dari yang disetujui dengan yang dilakukan setelah diskusi dengan PTmitra.

2. Apa yang dimaksud dengan psychological well-being dan psikoedukasi?3. Instrument perlu adaptasi bahasanya.4. Masih cukup banyak yang harus dikerjakan sehingga penjadwalan harus lebih ketat.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Prof. Dr. Suparno, M.Pd.Judul Penelitian : Comparative Education System for Early Childhood Academic Fields in





1. Data yang ditampilkan baru data karakteristik responden sedangkan data sistem layananakademik belum dapat ditampilkan.

2. Masih banyak yang harus dikerjakan, sehingga diperlukan penjadwalan yang lebih ketat.3. Semoga segera selesai.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Dr. Ali Muhtadi, M.Pd.Judul Penelitian : Comparative Study on The Implementation of Online Learning Model in Uny

Indonesia And Ukm Malaysia




1. Penelitian tidak dapat dilanjutkan karena komunikasi dengan UKM Malaysia tidak dapatberlangsung dengan baik.

2. Proposal dapat diajukan kembali pada tahun depan dengan mitra yang berbeda.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Adi Cilik Pierewan, Ph.DJudul Penelitian : Smoking and mental health in Indonesia and the United States




1. Perlu ditunjukkan perbandingan hasil temuan penelitian antara responden di Indonesia denganresponden di US.2. Bagaimana pembahasan, implikasi dan rekomendasi dari hasil penelitian ini perlu dijelaskan.







TAHUN 2020

Ketua Peneliti : Nur Azizah, Ph.D.Judul Penelitian : Teacher perception of self-determination




1.Hasil penelitian belum dapat disajikan.2. Masih banyak yang harus dikerjakan, sehingga diperlukan penjadwalan yang lebih ketat.3. Semoga segera selesai.


Prof. Dr. C. Asri Budiningsih, M.Pd. Dr. Nani Ratnaningsih, Ph.D.

study of physical activity during pandemic coronavirus disease ...

Documents

Transcript of study of physical activity during pandemic coronavirus disease ...