Pretending to Forget What’s Right Under Our Feet Until the Ground Gives Way: EXCO’s Marcellus...
Transcript of Pretending to Forget What’s Right Under Our Feet Until the Ground Gives Way: EXCO’s Marcellus...
Pretending to Forget What’s Right Under Our Feet Until theGround Gives Way: EXCO’s Marcellus Gambit, the SAGO Mine
Disaster, and the Price of Natural Gas
Wendy Lynne LeeBloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
Pretending to Forget What’s Right Under Our Feet Until theGround Gives Way: EXCO’s Marcellus Gambit, the SAGO Mine
Disaster, and the Price of Natural Gas
Why Philosophy Matters to Fracking: The Past is the Future
Long ago the foresightful German philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche argued that human beings were the sorts of creatures
who, in the quest to advance their own self-aggrandizing
interests, were compelled to forget acts of violence willingly
committed to those ends. And not only acts of violence, but
also deceptions, corruptions, swindles, exaggerations,
extortions—in short all manner of iniquity for the sake of
“progress” or “freedom” or “beauty” or “truth.” The trick,
argued Nietzsche, is to insulate ourselves not merely from the
notion that ends do not always justify means, but from having
to remember the means at all. Glory, after all, sounds a bit
tinny heralded while walking over the bodies of the dead.
Better that we should forget to look under our feet. Better
that we should think of reason as an instrument of execution
rather than a directive to conscience.
Such, some argue, is the genius of capitalist enterprise:
if each of us as workers and consumers can be convinced that
what matters is the product—and not the process required to
achieve it—we might be able to be persuaded to participate in
all manner of atrocity. What we have to believe is that the
product is something we can’t live without, or that it makes
us better, or that wanting it is our moral or religious or
patriotic duty. That such an extortion of consent requires the
appropriation of reason to the task of “how” over “why” is
certainly an enormous task—one that arguably epitomizes a
variety of modern fascism as the corporatist domination of the
state. Put in simpler terms, what effective marketing depends
on is a kind of perverse social contract, one in which we
collectively agree to forget just what sort of wounds we are
willing to call mere “process” for the sake of a product upon
which our dependence—however real—is made not of need but of
created need. And that is not the same thing at all—but, I’ll
argue, it’s vital to the extraction industries that we should
forget the difference. Enter EXCO Resources, Inc, a natural
gas corporation who, like all of its compatriots engaged in
the Marcellus Shale Play, locates its raison d’être in the
assumption that our need for fossil fuels is so great that we
will sanction—forget—whatever EXCO does to get to the gas.
Like the addict who vanquishes all memory of the crimes they
committed to get the heroin into their veins, so too EXCO
counts on each of us—leased and un-leased, Shalers or non, gas
field workers or ordinary consumers—to forego remembering the
dirty lineage of that gas. The past, after all, portends the
future; better to forget the past. The trouble is that when
that future is climate change or war over access to the very
water perversely fueled by the gas extraction process that
destroyed it, the past will as surely return to haunt us as
the name of the future is ecocide.
Forgetting, #1: EXCO at Fake Community Meeting,
DCNR State Forest Headquarters, January 2013.
The central cast of this first story of forgetting includes
EXCO CEO Douglas Miller and Billionaire investor Wilbur Ross.
It begins at a Sullivan County Energy Taskforce Meeting, DCNR
(Department of Conservation and Natural Resources), January
8th, 2013 at the DCNR State Forest Headquarters in Laporte,
Pennsylvania. Despite the fact that it was advertised as a
“community meeting” aimed at providing information to its
audience about EXCO’s drilling plans for Sullivan County, it
became evident that the horizontal slickwater hydraulic
fracturing corporation’s real motive was to recruit audience
members—mostly older folks—to sign leases before they left the
building. Indeed, we were informed at the door sign-in that
landmen and EXCO lawyers would be available to negotiate
leases (http://blog.shaleshockmedia.org/2013/01/09/fake-
community-meeting-exco-lookin-for-some-love-money/). Nowhere,
however, was what is arguably a misuse of a public building
for purposes of marketing spelled out in the public
announcement of the “community meeting”:
January 8, 2013 (Tue) 7:00 pm
DCNR State Forest HQRoute 220, Laporte, PA
SULLIVAN COUNTY ENERGY TASK FORCE MEETING WITH EXCO
An opportunity will be available for EXCO Resource
lessors and SC Energy Task Force attendees to hear a
presentation from representatives of EXCO Resources. As
you may know, EXCO has purchased much of Chief O&G LLC
holdings in Sullivan County.
Presentation will include but not be limited to:
• How they do things
• Plans for 2013 for exploration in Sullivan County
• Price of Natural Gas
• Utilization of NG
• Pipeline construction
• Environmental and Safety and Traffic
• Water Well testing
• Questions and answers to follow
WHO: Adam Pope & other EXCO personnel.
The facilities are limited, so this is on a first respond
basis and an RSVP is requested to confirm a seat. Rsvp to
John Silla muncys [at] epix.net.
I suppose that the reference to “lessors” and the disclaimer
“but not be limited to” could be put to the service of “going
get you to sign your land to a lease.” But “lessors,” of
course, means “already leased” and “but not limited to” didn’t
really cover the fact that the “other EXCO personnel” numbered
as many as 20 landmen, a lease negotiations representative,
and a lawyer who did her level best to keep me from taking
photographs and fellow fracktivist Dean Marshall from filming—
in a public building.
But let us set aside this potential impropriety. What
followed was the predictable dog and pony show about the
safety of fracking, the jobs, the cheap energy, the flag-
waving patriotic appeal to national security, and the implicit
but potent pitch to what “good Americans” do. When it was
over, Adam Pope—folksy jeans-wearing PR guy for EXCO—asked for
questions, and to the credit of members of the well-prepared
members of the audience (and the evident consternation of the
EXCO lawyer), he got some. As I recounted in a piece for
Shaleshock about why a number of audience members got up and
left once EXCO’s record of environmental violations and fines
was laid out:
Did they not want to hear about the DEP/EPA fines
EXCO has paid within the last year of operations in
Pennsylvania?The Progress News: EPA enters into
agreement with EXCO Resources.
Were they disturbed when someone pointed out the
fact that, once you do the basic math, the “.05″
EXCO claims is the amount of chemical solution (they
called it “dish detergent”), amounts to hundreds of
thousands of gallons of carcinogens, surfactants,
and biocides for the millions and millions of
gallons (they acknowledged five million as average)
they use to frack a single well? ().
Were they taken aback by EXCO’s demonstrably false
claim (see links in comments below) that they
recycle “100%” of their waste water–when in fact
they operate deep injection wells? (EXCO Resources paysDEP fine – SunGazette.com | News, Sports, Jobs, Community
Information – Williamsport-Sun Gazette andBurning Question:
Where Are Pa.’s Deep Injection Wells? | StateImpact
Pennsylvania).
Did they wince at the point made that FracFocus
reveals only those chemicals used in fracking that
are not protected by EXCO’s proprietary property
“rights”? (Hydraulic fracturing: FracFocus can’t replacefull, public disclosure, groups say — 05/21/2012 —
www.eenews.net).
Did they wince some more when someone pointed out
that Act 13 requires physicians to sign
nondisclosure agreements in the course of treating
patients whose illnesses are traceable to exposure
to flowback?
Did the recoil at the revelation that, given its
history, EXCO will abandon its waste-water disposal
wells once its bonds expire, and once any regulatory
agency isn’t paying attention? (Wastewater Disposal
Wells Under Scrutiny Following Irvin Leak – Pittsburgh Post-
Gazette – 3 January 2012).
I don’t know why these folks left. Perhaps they were lessors
feeling a twinge of guilt they preferred to forget. Perhaps
they were future lessors avoiding what they knew they’d have
to pretend to forget. What I do know is that EXCO probably
didn’t get what they came for, and that the reason this
matters is because of what the EXCO CEO, Douglas Miller—who
was at the “community meeting” would probably like to be able
to forget.
Forgetting, #2: EXCO CEO, Douglas Miller, Tries to Leverage a
Buy-Out Bid While Billionaire Investor, “Distressed Company
Restructurer,” and SAGO Mine Owner, Wilbur Ross, Jr. Stands By
Like the Wolf at the Door
Fact is, Douglas Miller needs his wells to produce. In January,
2011, the New York Times reported that
The board of Exco Resources, an oil and gas producer
based in Dallas, said on Thursday that it was considering
a buyout offer made by Douglas H. Miller, the company’s
chief executive officer, which values Exco at $4.35
billion.
Mr. Miller told the board in October that he was
interested in buying the company. He offered $20.50 cash
for every share he did not already own, 38 percent above
the share price before his bid was announced. The offer
is yet another sign of the active management-led-buyout
market.
The board said that it had “determined it is in the best
interests of shareholders to commence a comprehensive and
independent review of strategic alternatives to maximize
shareholder value.”(http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/exco-board-is-
mulling-ceos-buyout-bid/)
It’s notable that Miller’s 38% premium ($20.58 per share)
offer to take publicly traded (2006) EXCO private was even
spicier than Exxon’s 2009 acquisition of XTO at a mere 25%
(http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/11/01/a-big-bet-on-exco-and-natural-gas/). Indeed,
despite the sharply falling price of natural gas, and even
despite Exxon’s shareholder displeasure with the acquisition
of XTO, Miller was apparently feeling pretty confident about
his bid. And why not? “Exco shares rose 26 cents, or 1.36
percent, to $19.34 on the news,”
(http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/exco-board-is-mulling-ceos-buyout-bid/),
sufficient to gain the support of support of T. Boone Pickens
who reportedly owns 9.2 million shares in the company. Plus,
Miller was receiving good news from the frack fields:
The company also announced significant increases in its
proved and unproved natural gas reserves, saying that
they had grown 28 percent and 114 percent, respectively,
from the previous year. Exco claimed 1.5 trillion cubic
feet of proved natural gas reserves as of December 31,
and said increases were coming from drilling in its
Haynesville shale assets. (http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/exco-
board-is-mulling-ceos-buyout-bid/).
The Haynesville “shale play,” however, is in Louisiana—not
Sullivan County (or anywhere county), Pennsylvania
(http://www.excoresources.com/east-texas-north-louisiana.htm).
Turns out that Miller’s confidence—and hence the money he
needs to make good on this bid—may have been a wee bit
premature. Almost exactly one year after the New York Times
reports that “Mr. Miller is hardly going out on a limb with
his offer” (http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/11/01/a-big-bet-on-exco-
and-natural-gas/), the Wall Street Journal reveals, November
2011, that he’s “licking his wounds from a botched effort to
take his natural-gas company private”(http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/11/23/failure-has-its-rewards-exco-ceo-
gets-3-3-million/).
What happened?
Eight months go by, and no deal. Exco shareholders and
employees start to get a little antsy and curious when and
whether Miller was going to pull the trigger on a buyout. No
other suitors seem interested in offering a rival takeover
proposal. Then this summer, Miller made the unusual conclusion
that his own company wasn’t worth nearly as much as he
thought.
Or, rather, Miller realized he couldn’t borrow enough money to
buy Exco on the terms he initially proposed. Instead, Miller
tried to cobble together a deal to buy just a chunk of Exco, a
deal that would have been cheaper but still leave Miller in
charge. In July, Exco threw in the towel altogether on the
idea of selling the company.
And where did that leave Exco shareholders? With a
company whose market value has shriveled as much as $2
billion since Miller’s offer last fall.(http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/11/23/failure-has-its-rewards-exco-
ceo-gets-3-3-million/)
Key Phrase: “Miller realized he couldn’t borrow enough money
to buy Exco,” not even a “chunk.” Incredibly, Miller is—true
to the new American Way—rewarded for this spectacular failure:
And for his good work this year, Miller is being handed cash
and stock awards with a current value of $3.26 million.
According to a regulatory filing today, the Exco board
approved a $500,000 cash bonus to Miller based on the
compensation committee’s “assessment of 2011
performance.” Miller also was awarded 266,317 shares of
restricted stock. At Exco’s closing stock price
Wednesday, those shares are valued at $2.76 million(http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/11/23/failure-has-its-rewards-exco-
ceo-gets-3-3-million/).
Speaking of “chunks,” that’s quite a chunk-o-change—a fact
which doubtless creates considerably more pressure on Miller to
get those Sullivan County wells to come in. Enter Billionaire
Investor Wilbur Ross, Jr. who in the same week of July 2012,
not only buys a Rene Magritte painting valued at 11.3 million
but, according to Shane Sokol and Meena Krishnamsetty (who
“owns a long position” in Chesapeake) of Market Watch, purchased
a very large number of shares of natural gas producer EXCO
Resources, Inc. XCO +2.24%(http://www.marketwatch.com/story/billionaire-wilbur-rosss-latest-energy-
pick-2012-07-13):
From June 18 through June 20, Ross purchased 700,000
shares at an average price of $6.78 per share. His total
cost amounted to $4,746,751. Invesco's WL Ross & Co. is a
specialist in leading turnaround groups that invest in
and restructure distressed companies. The fund is managed
by Mr. Ross and has a sizable stake in the company(http://www.marketwatch.com/story/billionaire-wilbur-rosss-latest-
energy-pick-2012-07-13).
To be specific 29.5 million shares compared to T. Boone
Pickens’ paltry 9.2 million, purchased at $13.80 dollars less a
share. The highest in fact that Ross ever paid for a share of
EXCO was $14.00. Ouch. But that’s what you get for a company
“whose market value has shriveled as much as $2 billion.” How
did this happen? A familiar, all too familiar story—one the
fracking corporations would surely prefer to forget:
Over the previous year (2010-11), a supply glut of
natural gas drove the commodity to record low prices,
prompting many investors to sell their shares of XCO
without pause. The stock consequently fell off the
proverbial cliff, tumbling from a 52-week high of $16.70
reached last July, to a 52-week low of $5.74 touched on
both April 18 and 19 of this year. That is a drop of
65.6%, about two-thirds of the company's market value
wiped away in a few months. Since reaching those lows,
shares have recovered slightly, trading near $6.92.
However, that’s still 58.5% off its peak.(http://www.marketwatch.com/story/billionaire-wilbur-rosss-latest-energy-pick-2012-07-
13).
The mystery, then, is why Miller has persisted. After all, he
knows as well as anyone that “restructure distressed
companies,” is corporate-speak for “vulture” and Wilbur is
naught but the wolf at the door. Miller’s British—but the old
chestnut about how the British character soldiers on hardly
seems rational in this case. As Sokol and Krishnamsetty
continues, however:
There does appear to be light at the end of the tunnel
for XCO. Natural gas prices might be finding their
footing as a recent report found that power generation
plants used 40% more natural gas and 20% less coal this
past March. As that trend may continue, the glut in
natural gas supplies could be shrinking, helping to lift
or at least stabilize prices.
Several analysts have recently become more positive on
the stock as well. On May 8, KeyBanc upgraded XCO to a
buy. Not only did analyst Jack Aydin see better gas
prices coming, he sees opportunities others don't and
adjusted his 2012 earnings estimates from $0.04 to $0.16
per share, a 400% increase. Mr. Aydin stated this was an
environment where "XCO has a number of potential
transactions that are on the cusp of being consummated,
which could provide significant catalysts for shares if
executed to plan" (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/billionaire-wilbur-rosss-latest-energy-pick-2012-07-13).
That is, if the gas continues to roll in, if markets can be
created at home and/or abroad to buy it in large enough
quantities, and if Miller can hold out long enough, he may
just be able to keep the Wilbur-Wolf at bay and make an even
bigger bonus by 2014. No wonder he’s willing to get into some
uncomfortable looking jeans and slum it with the good folks of
rural Pennsylvania for an evening. Though he looked
alternately bored and dismayed, I imagine him musing—or
anguishing—over the latest Ross gambit. According to Michael
Merced of the New York Times, by August of 2011, Ross, once
dubbed “the King of Bankruptcy” by Fortune magazine, had
raised his EXCO stake to 12% of the company, up from 9.8%,
though his “purposes are unclear”
(ht tp://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/08/08/wilbur-ross-raises-his-exco-stake-
to-12/). Indeed,
Exco announced late last month [July, 2011] that it had
reached a standstill agreement with WL Ross that
prohibits the firm from owning more than 20 percent. The
agreement extends to preventing the billionaire from
offering to buy Exco or working with any other potential
suitor. (http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/08/08/wilbur-ross-raises-
his-exco-stake-to-12/)
That’s right after “Exco’s decision last month to call off
efforts to sell itself. The company walked away from a $4
billion takeover bid led its chairman and chief executive,
Douglas H. Miller” (http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/08/08/wilbur-ross-
raises-his-exco-stake-to-12/).
And there’s this: Ross is the big bad wolf. Via subsidiary
corporations, Wolf Run Mining Corporation, itself a subsidiary of
Hunter Ridge Mining Corporation, both subsidiaries of ICG, Inc,
International Coal Group—formed in 2004 by Ross, Ross owns the Sago
mine in Upshur County, West Virginia where a 2006 explosion
was responsible for trapping thirteen miners—only one
surviving. “It was the worst mining disaster in the United
States since the Jim Walter Resources Mine Disaster in Alabama
on September 23, 2001,[1][2] and the worst disaster in West
Virginia since the 1968 Farmington Mine Disaster”
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sago_Mine_disaster). The Sago mine had
been sited 208 times by the Mine Safety and Health Administration
(MSHA) in 2005, 96—nearly half—“serious and substantial
(S&S).”
The Charleston Gazette said "Sago mine has history of roof
falls". MSHA found 52 violations from April to June, of
which 31 were "serious and substantial" (S&S). From early
July to late September, MSHA found 70 violations, 42 of
which were S&S. MSHA inspections from early October to
late December resulted in 46 citations and three orders,
18 of which were S&S. Violations include failure to
follow the approved roof control and mine ventilation
plans and problems concerning emergency escapeways and
required pre-shift safety examinations. The Gazette
article explained that "S&S" violations are those that
MSHA believes are likely to cause an accident that would
seriously injure a miner… Davitt McAteer, MSHA chief
during the Clinton administration told The Gazette, "The
numbers don’t sound good....[they are] sufficiently high
that it should tip off management that there is something
amiss here. For a small operation, that is a significant
number of violations." McAteer said the roof fall
frequency "suggests that the roof is bad and that the
support system is not meeting the needs of the roof."
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sago_Mine_disaster)
Yet when Ross was interviewed January 2006, by Brian Ross of
ABC, here’s what he had to say about safety at SAGO other than
“Oh, my God, it's the worst week of my entire life.”
BRIAN ROSS
Would you call this a safe mine?
WILBUR ROSS
I believed that the mine was fundamentally safe.
BRIAN ROSS
You really do?
WILBUR ROSS
Yeah, I really do. (http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?
id=1872255&page=1).
Apparently, Ross is very good at forgetting.
Brian Ross went on to ask Wilbur Ross what he thought of his
Wall Street reputation as a vulture investor. The latter
responded “[n]o, I think if we had a bird, it wouldn't be the
vulture. A vulture picks flesh off a dead carcass.” But the
Sago mine “had been in bankruptcy for two years when Ross
bought it and bought into a mine that for its size may have
been the most dangerous coal mine in America”
(http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=1872255&page=1). Moreover,
Ross knew Sago’s violation history—twenty roof collapses and
thirteen partial shutdowns just the previous year—and when
Brian Ross asked how he could operate a mine like that,
whether he was comfortable “sending men into that hole” the
possible next CEO of EXCO responded that
We were comfortable based on the assurances from our
management that they felt that it was a safe situation.
(http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=1872255&page=2)
And that’s pretty much it. Wilbur Ross did establish a two
million dollar fund for the surviving families, but as Brian
Ross remarks “It seems, with all due respect, sir, sort of
cheap.” And, it turns out not one dime of that was Ross’ own
money—despite the fact that he controls ten billion dollars in
company assets (http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?
id=1872255&page=3). Compare that to the original $4,746,751 he
put into EXCO. Were I Doug Miller, I’d be going to every
“community meeting” I could get myself invited to, and I’d be
bringing every one of my landmen with me. Wilbur Ross
epitomizes the good American of America, INC. not despite his
being the Big Bad Wolf, but precisely because he epitomizes the
“entrepreneurial spirit” captured in the cynical and extortive
use of extraction industry rhetoric like “Cheap! American!
Abundant!” No pitch more succinctly captures EXCO’s
“informational” show at the Sullivan County “community
meeting” replete with slide show including flags, gorgeous
vistas and grossly distorted graphics of the fracking process.
Douglas Miller—jeans and all—plays not only at Marcellus
extraction, but plays his audience in the hope of securing
leases, getting frack pads constructed, getting the profits
rolling in before his board of directors decides to lift its
moratorium against how much of the company stock Ross can buy.
As Miller certainly knows in his bones, Ross has plans
for EXCO. Reported by Reuters, September 24th, 2012:
“Billionaire investor Wilbur Ross plans to take part in
China's first shale gas tender open to foreign investors by
teaming up Exco Resources (XCO.N), a U.S. natural gas firm he
holds a stake in, with a Chinese partner”(http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/25/us-finance-wlross-
idUSBRE88O00G20120925). In other words, Ross is hedging his bets
against Miller’s gambit in the Marcellus by committing EXCO to
a “partnership” with the Chinese to frack China. That way,
even if Miller’s Marcellus shale play goes belly up, Ross will
make good on his 12% investment.
Ross, one of the world's best-known distressed-asset
investors, traveled to Beijing this week to find a joint
venture partner for Exco, which has been struggling with
a sharp decline in natural gas prices.
Ross, who owns at least 12 percent of the company through
his investment arm WL Ross & Co, became an Exco board
director in March.
"I think we will have a joint venture partner. Bids are
due in (late) October and we hope to be organized by
then," the WL Ross CEO told Reuters at a conference in
Singapore, though he declined to name the companies he
was talking to.
Ross: "There have only been 63 wells drilled with that
technology, whereas there have been over 1 million drills
in the United States. So I think there will be quite a
few joint ventures between Chinese companies and American
companies that have the technology."(http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/25/us-finance-wlross-
idUSBRE88O00G20120925)
And that is what fracking for natural gas production is all
about: the guarantee of profits regardless life, environmental
integrity, or human suffering. China has among the worst
environmental records with respect to extraction of fossil
fuels in the world (http://mondediplo.com/blogs/china-s-out-of-control-pollution).
But Ross apparently cares no more about that than he
apparently cares about the Sago mine workers or their
families. Wilbur Ross is not only the “King of Bankruptcy,”
he’s Douglas Miller’s best friend and worst nightmare. That’s
a lot to try to forget.
Forgetting #3: EXCO in Sullivan County, Pennsylvania
Were I Douglas Miller, I might be dreaming in the King’s
English, but I’d be having nightmares in Chinese. Or—nearly,
but not quite. As was reported in February 2013, if Miller
could get those Marcellus wells producing, connected to
pipeline, the gas ready for transport, he might yet be able to
pull out some sort of deal. Enter the one investor who
controls more EXCO stock than Wilbur Ross, Howard Marks of the
investment firm underwriting Miller’s buyout bid: Oaktree
Capital Investments (http://www.oaktreecapital.com/default.aspx?
AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1).“In addition to Wilbur Ross, Howard
Marks has also built a position in XCO of 37 million shares,
representing 5% of his portfolio according to Insider Monkey…
In fact, put together Ross' 32 million shares and Marks' 37
million shares and that accounts for more than half of the
float of 132 million shares. In July 2011, XCO's CEO put
together a deal to take the company private at $18.50/share.
Although the deal fell apart, Oaktree was one of the funds
enlisted to facilitate the buyout.”(http://seekingalpha.com/article/1154751-exco-resources-wilbur-ross-howard-
marks-all-in-on-this-beaten-up-stock?source=email_rt_article_title).
Could Marks keep the Ross-Wolf outside the EXCO door?
Perhaps. This seems clearly in the interests of Oaktree—but
what it all depends on is not just the success of the shale
play, but a rise in the price of natural gas, and this, of
course, depends upon creating both domestic and global markets
for it. Hence it’s no surprise that EXCO secured a recent 50%
interest in TGGT, a midstream “gathering system” pipeline in
North Louisiana and East Texas
(http://www.excoresources.com/midstream.htm), partnered with
Harbinger Group, Inc. to the tune of 597.5 million paid to
EXCO, and whose aim is to create “a private oil and gas jointventure that will buy and operate Exco properties in Texas and
Louisiana” (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/harbinger-exco-form-oil-gas-
203633750.html). It’s also no surprise that Wilbur Ross is
romancing the Chinese. With so much pressure to make his
Marcellus Shale Play come to fruition, it’s no wonder that
MIller might be willing to cut whatever corners he can to get
production moving. Indeed, he already has. Welcome to EXCO’s
newest “play” on PA State Game Lands: The EXCO Elk Grove
Hunting Club, Pad 1-9H. On January 12th, 2013 a friend and I
drove out to this new site because I wanted to begin the
process of photo-documenting a site whose suitability for
fracking I consider particularly troubling. Located on tax-
payer supported state game lands, just up-hill from a village
dependent almost entirely on outdoor recreation, adjacent to
the West Branch of Fishing Creek—a major water source which
feeds directly into the Susquehanna River—and criss-crossed up
to a mountain top pad by “exceptional value” trout streams
with pretty names like Painter’s Run, it’s hard to imagine a
more vulnerable location.
What our drive revealed was EXCO’s first stab at trading
expediency for environmental protection. As the photographs I
sent to a DEP agent (who will remain anonymous) show, EXCO had
provided little or no Erosion and Sediment (E&S) prevention to
keep mud—potentially contaminated with diesel—from washing
into the West Branch of Fishing Creek. We called DEP, and I
followed up January 15th with email to the agent. The agent
responded with a request to send the photographs, which I did.
What followed was an investigation by the agent, and an
ensuing “notice of violation”:
Remarks: This inspection (beginning at approximately
13:00 on a warm sunny day follow a major thaw) was
prompted by a complaint that E&S controls were lacking on
the site (Complaint #294285). A previous inspection
observed that the narrow Game Commission Rd (Forest Road)
leading to the site crosses a number of headwater
tributaries vulnerable to sediment discharges. EXCO site
manager Pat Weaver has been adding rock to the road, and
installing check damn and silt rock in roadside ditches
in an attempt to protect Waters of the Commonwealth...I
observed violations of PA environmental regulations on
the impoundment site. Currently the HWD11 Rig and
associated equipment is being stored on the impoundment
site. The impoundment site is still under construction.
There are large soil piles that need to be moved and
modified, the site is not at final grade, there is no
surface rock or gravel in place. Since there has been
snow, freezing rain and rain in this location, the
surface of the impoundment area is very wet. Much of the
rig equipment is on containment. However, during my
inspection I identified a number of areas on the
impoundment site where pollutional substances were
released or spilled onto the ground. These were spread
across the Southwest quadrant of the impoundment where
much of the equipment was stored. In particular, I
observed a pollutional substance on the ground and
downslope in puddles. There was also petroleum product
traveling in a small flow of water from underneath
containment. I could not tell if this was emanating from
a leak in the containment or from underneath the
containment. There were also several other small,
strongly iridescent puddles…In particular the petroleum
product sheens were thick, iridescent, reformed when
split apart, and gave off a string chemical odor. The
other pollutional substance was thick, white to cream or
off-white in color, slippery to the touch, and also gave
off a strong chemical odor. During my inspection, staff
called for a vac truck and crew began laying down
absorbent pads…I was told that the rig is onsite awaiting
completion of the pad so that drilling can begin. It is
also worth noting that this gas drilling is located in,
and is surrounded by, Exceptional Value watersheds which
contain a number of streams that support natural trout
reproduction and include a Class A trout stream.
I have included almost all of the notice to insure its
accurate representation with respect to its “exceptional”
location, and in order to make the following observation as
clearly as possible: EXCO had not yet even begun to drill, and
had not my friend and I taken the time to drive out to Elk
Grove, had we not reported the absence of an E&S plan, had we
not followed up by emailing the DEP agent, goading the agent
to visit the site, these streams might have already been
polluted. Indeed, they likely already have. But given the
pressure to “Frack, baby! Frack! which must surely govern
Douglas Miller’s every waking minute, and given that EXCO was
not fined in this incident, and given that DEP is governed by
a profoundly corrupt Corbett administration whose head,
Michael Krancer (Solicitor for Exelon) has made it his mission
to insure the Susquehanna River is not listed as impaired, my
bet is that a few “exceptional value” trout streams don’t even
generate a ripple in Miller’s conscience, much less his
wolfish-BFF, Wilbur Ross’.
I drove out again to the site on January 18th, and this
time I hiked the two miles up to the frack pad. What’s clear
is that the Game Commission road—Forest Road—is wholly
unprepared to absorb the truck traffic pounding up and down
this small mountain. Any accident along this road could prove
disastrous, and as the photographs illustrate, the trout
streams cross under the road over and over. The EXCO Elk Grove
Hunting Club frack pad is an environmental and economic
catastrophe waiting to happen. Any accident that runs
downhill, down stream, down creek is going to destroy the
recreational economy of the village below as surely as the
Spring thaw will arrive. And this is just one of hundreds of
well pads operated by EXCO who depends on there being
virtually no oversight, no substantive fines, no meaningful
regulation, and no meaningful will on the part of the state to
decline permits for wells, compressor stations, dehydrators,
water withdrawals, or pipelines.
We might be tempted to appeal to Act 13 on this score,
and argue that the dollars the Village of Elk Grove will
receive from its impact fee will off-set if not remediate any
negative effects from the drilling. But this too would be
short-sighted and economically mercenary at best since there
will simply be no amount of money sufficient to restore these
streams once they have been polluted—particularly if that
pollution involves the well-documented highly carcinogenic
chemicals utilized in the fracking process—many of which
remain protected both in identification, quantity, and
interactive effects by the G.W. Bush administration’s
strengthening of proprietary rights laws in 2005. Who,
moreover, would risk eating fish from these streams given Act
13’s gag order which criminalizes physicians who reveal the
potential amount or mix of the fracking chemicals to patients
demonstrably made sick by those chemicals? Perhaps, the pro-
gas advocate might argue, the possibility of damage to these
exceptional streams is too abstract—it hasn’t happened yet.
Such, of course, was Ross’ reasoning about the Sago mine—until
the roof caved in and suffocated twelve human lives. Such is
obviously Exco’s reasoning at the double-frack site one minute
over a narrow bridge shared by school buses just outside of
Lairdesville, PA—one minute from an elementary school. Let’s
imagine a second interview with Wilbur Ross, this time after,
say, a Minuteman Residual Waste Tanker and a school bus filled
with thirteen elementary school children collide on icy two
lane Rt. 118 just before the bridge into Lairdesville and the
school parking lot. Let’s say that after hours of attempting
to extract and revive the children, one survives.
ABC Reporter
Would you call this a safe route for residual waste tanker
trucks to share with school buses?
WILBUR ROSS
I believed that the road was fundamentally safe.
BRIAN ROSS
You really do?
WILBUR ROSS
Yeah, I really do.
Perhaps Ross will offer the parents two million dollars as
compensation. But why should this be any more the cold comfort
than the paltry two million he offered to the families of
Sago? Would two million make the residents of Elk Grove feel
better once they’ve lost their livelihoods to an “inadvertent
return to surface”? That tanker accident, explosion, “return
to surface” hasn’t happened yet. But if it does, there will be
no impact fee to return the lives of dead children to their
parents; no impact fee that can restore the communities
divided and conquered by the landmen; no impact fee that can
eradicate the breast cancer associated with exposure to
Benzene—just one of at least 27 carcinogens in the fracking
cocktail. There is no impact fee that can return “exceptional”
status to Pennsylvania’s waterways once they’re saturated by
the carcinogens, biocides, surfactants, and potentially
radioactive flowback seeping from fissures in cement casings
estimated by the industry itself to leak 6% of the time—right
from the start—and 100% of the time eventually. But what EXCO
asks us to forget is all of this for the sake of calculating
the value of our communities, our environments, and our lives
in terms of two things, jobs and an effective bribe that’s
nothing more than a cheap imitation of a severance tax.
Forgetting #4: Mountains of Charlatans
The scale of charlatans deployed throughout the Marcellus
shale play is impressive and plentiful. It includes those,
like Douglas Miller and Wilbur Ross, whose power and influence
can buy them cover behind the promise of things like jobs,
sponsored community events, new school buildings, improved
roads, donations to charitable organizations—all investments
in our complicity, our indebtedness, and our silence.
Organizations like the Marcellus Shale Coalition and the notorious
anti-regulation hit squad Energy in Depth run interference for an
industry seemingly intent on ripping the last fossil fuel
dollar from under our feet even at the risk of converting the
state into a future super fund site. The ace of the Marcellus
shale play, of course, lay in the promise of jobs. If we can
be persuaded to simply forget the role Big Energy played in
the 2007 banking crisis, the ensuing Great Recession, and the
stock market plummet, we can be convinced that corporations
like EXCO have our best interests at heart, and that the
evidence is in the well-paying proliferation of employment in
the enormous array of directly related—say, well-pad
construction—or ancillary industries—say, motels and taverns—
benefitting from fracking—at least during its boom.
It’s arguable, however, that when the value of a human
being becomes commodified as the exchange value of her or his
labor—once that exchange value is internalized—workers can be
counted on to identify their own interests with that of their
bosses, well, their bosses’ profits. Such was brought home to
me recently in a particularly crude attack on a photograph I
had posted in an album some months ago on Facebook. The
photograph depicts a mobile home being removed after the end
of the resistance at Riverdale Mobile Home Community when the
land was sold to Aqua America for the construction of a water
withdrawal site for frack operations near Williamsport. I had
tagged the picture with a critical appraisal of Aqua America’s
motives, and for reasons unknown to me a passel of fracking
industry workers alighted on it, and began what became 204
comments worth of declamatory assault which included calling
me a “scum-sucking bitch” and offering me salacious
opportunities to join them in their frack water hot tubs,
among other things. Clearly threatened by anyone who’d dare to
criticize the industry that paid for their RVs, their rifles,
their cars and trucks, they splattered out industry talking
points about “clean,” “American,” and “abundant” in between a
blue streak of invectives, taunts, and slurs.
These men—reckless, misogynist, and arrogant—provided a
picture of life on a drill pad that should leave all of us
chastened and circumspect about a worldview common to the
fracking industry. But—and this is the moral of my long story—
we would be forgetful fools if we thought that there existed a
morally relevant difference between these workers and the
Douglas Millers (EXCO), the Howard Marks (Oaktree), the Aubrey
McClendons (Chesapeake), the Dan O. Dinges (Cabot), the
Jeffrey Venturas (Range Resources), the James T. Hacketts
(Anadarko), the Jack Williams (XTO), the Nick DeBenedictis
(Aqua America), the John Shermans (Inergy), or the Wilber
Rosses of the world—all white, all male very much like the
vast majority of shale field workers who identify with them—
and haven’t a chance in the world of being them. The
difference is strictly economic. Corporations like EXCO can
afford to buy all the government collusion, the department of
environmental protection acquiescence, fake community
meetings, and recession-weary workers they want. But when the
price is the conversion of our state forests, game lands,
neighborhoods—especially poor ones—our roads, and fields, and
rural ways of life into, as geo-science professor and frack-
industry consultant Terry Engelder puts it, sacrifice zones—it’s
not just that the price is too high. It’s that while guys like
RJ Mundrick can call us names, Wilbur Ross can effectively
kill us. While reckless and exhausted frack field truck
drivers might be guilty of illegally dumping flowback water
onto forest roads, Douglas Miller can insure nothing is done
about it. While a roughneck might harass a local waitress—even
get away with it—Dan Dinges can preside over the operations
that destroyed an entire community—Dimock—and be rewarded with
millions in salary and stock options.
Calling me a “scum-sucking bitch” is at least an honest
use of the first amendment, and it brings me back-round to
Friedrich Nietzsche and forgetting. To be complicit in the face
of ruin is, I think, to be complicit in the fact of ruin. It
is, in other words, not merely cowardice to do nothing when
the facts arrayed before you spell destruction, it is
something yet more loathsome. It is willful forgetting. Wilbur
Ross counts on us to forget Sago. EXCO counts on us to forget
its record of environmental violation in, for example,
Clearfield and now Sullivan County. Cabot counts on us to
forget Dimock. Range Resources counts on us to forget its
record of illegal dumps of frack fluids, its contamination of
drinking water wells with benzene, or the personal injury
lawsuit in Washington County for exposure to “toxic leaks,
spills, and air pollutants from Range's fracking operations in
Yeager Marcellus Shale, Pennsylvania”
(http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Range_Resources).
The only response I received from DEP concerning the 403
variations on “scum-sucking bitch” was “Hi Wendy, I would
ignore it. I think that it's First Amendment flaming. They can
say what they want about DEP.” They can, and they can count on
DEP to forget, right along with the citizens of the
Commonwealth, that our water is being poisoned, our property
values tanked, our air polluted, and our communities
destroyed. This response was from the same DEP agent who
promised to keep an eye on EXCO at Elk Run. what the frackingindustry counts on us to forget the most is that there exists