PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MINUTES - Wright County

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

MINUTES - DISPENSE WITH READING. APPROVE AS WRITTEN/REVISED.

COUNTY BOARD MINUTES 06-21-2022

06-21-2022 WRIGHT COUNTY BOARD MEETING MINUTES.PDF

REVIEW & APPROVAL OF AGENDA

CONSENT AGENDA

ADMINISTRATION

1. Amend Work Assignment For Bob Hiivala To Conduct Outlined Work

And Research Pertaining To The Wright County Fair Board.

RFBA - AMENDED HIIVALA WORK ASSIGNMENT.PDFHIIVALA WORK ASSIGNMENT (002).PDF

ADMINSTRATION - FINANCE

1. Acknowledge Warrants Issued Between June 13, 2022 And June 21,

2022.

2. Approve Renewal Of Annual Club On- Sale, Off- Sale And Sunday

Liquor License For Up The Creek Grill & Bar For The License Period July

1, 2022 To June 30, 2023.

3. Approve A Temporary 1- Day On- Sale Liquor License For Clearwater

American Legion Post 323 For An Event On July 16th, 2022.

4. Motion To Approve The Reimbursement Of The American Rescue

Plan Act Funds (ARP) As Follows:

County ARP Funds:

Approval Of Use Of ARP Funds From 01- 099- 493- 8433- 6020.

$3,510.00 2.2 Household Assistance



County ARP Funds:


$469.99 2.34 Aid To Nonprofit Organizations

6. Approve Budget Amendment And Transfer Of $448,195.00 From

Department 100 To The Department 250 For The Increase To The Jail

Medical Contract.

01- 100- 000- 0000- 6910 Transfer Out $448,195.00

01- 250- 000- 0000- 5910 Transfer In $448,195.00

AGENDA 6-28 CONSENT - RFBA UP THE CREEK LL RENEWAL.PDFAGENDA 6-28 CONSENT - RFBA - TEMP LICENSE.PDFRFBA - APPROVE ARP FUNDS 1.PDFRFBA - APPROVE ARP FUNDS 2.PDFRFBA - BUDGET AMENDMENT.PDF

ADMINISTRATION - HUMAN RESOURCES

1. Request Approval To Appoint Michael Brandenburg To A Three- Year

Term On The Wright County Personnel Board Of Appeals Effective

July 1, 2022 Through June 30, 2025.

RFBA -MICHAEL BRANDENBURG PERSONNEL BOARD OF APPEALS APPOINTMENT-JUNE 28 2022.PDF

ADMINISTRATION - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

1. Approve Out Of State Travel For Alek Halverson, GIS Coordinator, To

Attend The 2022 ESRI User Conference In San Diego, California From

July 11- July 15.

RFBA- GIS OUT OF STATE CONFERENCE.PDF

ADMINISTRATION - RISK MANAGEMENT

1. Authorization For Signatures On An Agreement Between The State Of

Minnesota Department Of Natural Resources (DNR) And Wright

County. The Agreement Will Allow The DNR Use The Space Under The

Hangar Building Located At 505 County Road 37 NE Buffalo, MN

(Wright County Compost And Recycling Center).

WRIGHT COUNTY DNR AGREEMENT RFBA.PDFDNR LICENSE 489-FINAL.PDF

ATTORNEY

1. Refer New Position Of Assistant Civil Division Chief And County

Attorney Office Reorganization And Reclassification To The Personnel

Committee.

RFBA - NEW POSITION OF ASSISTANT CIVIL DIVISION CHIEF.PDF

TIMED AGENDA ITEMS

LINDSEY MEYER, ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE

1. Approve Absentee Ballot Board, Mail Ballot Absentee Ballot Board,

And UOCAVA Ballot Board Members For The 2022- 2023 Election

Cycle.

AGENDA 6-28 TIMED - RFBA APPROVE BALLOT BOARD APPOINTEES.PDF

JOHN BOWEN, ATTORNEY

1. Approve Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) For Inspection Of

Grandstand Bleachers At The Wright County Fairgrounds.

RFBA - TIMED ATTORNEY.PDFFAIRGROUND INSPECTION JPA.PDF

ADAM AUSTING, EXTENSION

1. Adopt A Resolution Proclaiming The Lambert Family As The Wright

County 2022 Farm Family Of The Year .

RFBA - EXTENSION OFFICE.PDFFARM FAMILY DECLARATION 2022 LAMBERT.PDF

PUBLIC HEARING FOR COUNTY DITCH #10

1. Public Hearing For County Ditch #10

RFBA - AG AND DRAINAGE_FINAL_PH.PDFWRIGHT CD 10 REALIGNMENT ENGINEERS REPORT.PDF

ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION

COMMITTEE MINUTES

1. Committee Of The Whole Minutes (06/20/2022)

2. Personnel/Employee Relations Minutes (06/22/2022)

06-20-2022 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES.PDFCOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING RECOMMENDATIONS.PDF06-22-2022 PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MINUTES PDF.PDFPERSONNEL MEETING RECOMMENDATIONS.PDF310 PTO POLICY - LINED COPY.PDF301 PTO POLICY - CLEAN COPY.PDF

ADVISORY COMMITTEE / ADVISORY BOARD UPDATES

ADJOURNMENT

WARRANTS ISSUED

06-13-2022 THRU 06-21-2022 WARRANTS ISSUED 2,592,043.15.PDF06-13-2022 THRU 06-21-2022 CLIENT WARRANTS ISSUED 170,592.15.PDF06-21-22 FIRST HALF DISTRIBUTION P TAX 47,681,173.84.PDF

BOARD AGENDA

BOARD OF WRIGHT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

JUNE 28, 2022

Christine Husom, District 1

Darek Vetsch, District 2

Mark Daleiden, District 3

Mary Wetter, District 4

Michael Kaczmarek, District 5

I. 9:00 A.M.

II.

A.

Documents:

III.

IV.

A.

Documents:

B.

Documents:

C.

Documents:

D.

Documents:

E.

Documents:

F.

Documents:

V.

A. 9:02 A.M.

Documents:

B. 9:07 A.M.

Documents:

C. 9:10 A.M.

Documents:

D. 9:30 A.M.

Documents:

VI.

A.

Documents:

VII.

VIII.

IX.

Documents:

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

MINUTES - DISPENSE WITH READING. APPROVE AS WRITTEN/REVISED.

COUNTY BOARD MINUTES 06-21-2022

06-21-2022 WRIGHT COUNTY BOARD MEETING MINUTES.PDF

REVIEW & APPROVAL OF AGENDA

CONSENT AGENDA

ADMINISTRATION

1. Amend Work Assignment For Bob Hiivala To Conduct Outlined Work

And Research Pertaining To The Wright County Fair Board.

RFBA - AMENDED HIIVALA WORK ASSIGNMENT.PDFHIIVALA WORK ASSIGNMENT (002).PDF

ADMINSTRATION - FINANCE

1. Acknowledge Warrants Issued Between June 13, 2022 And June 21,

2022.

2. Approve Renewal Of Annual Club On- Sale, Off- Sale And Sunday

Liquor License For Up The Creek Grill & Bar For The License Period July

1, 2022 To June 30, 2023.

3. Approve A Temporary 1- Day On- Sale Liquor License For Clearwater

American Legion Post 323 For An Event On July 16th, 2022.



County ARP Funds:


$3,510.00 2.2 Household Assistance



County ARP Funds:


$469.99 2.34 Aid To Nonprofit Organizations

6. Approve Budget Amendment And Transfer Of $448,195.00 From

Department 100 To The Department 250 For The Increase To The Jail

Medical Contract.

01- 100- 000- 0000- 6910 Transfer Out $448,195.00

01- 250- 000- 0000- 5910 Transfer In $448,195.00

AGENDA 6-28 CONSENT - RFBA UP THE CREEK LL RENEWAL.PDFAGENDA 6-28 CONSENT - RFBA - TEMP LICENSE.PDFRFBA - APPROVE ARP FUNDS 1.PDFRFBA - APPROVE ARP FUNDS 2.PDFRFBA - BUDGET AMENDMENT.PDF

ADMINISTRATION - HUMAN RESOURCES

1. Request Approval To Appoint Michael Brandenburg To A Three- Year

Term On The Wright County Personnel Board Of Appeals Effective

July 1, 2022 Through June 30, 2025.

RFBA -MICHAEL BRANDENBURG PERSONNEL BOARD OF APPEALS APPOINTMENT-JUNE 28 2022.PDF

ADMINISTRATION - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

1. Approve Out Of State Travel For Alek Halverson, GIS Coordinator, To

Attend The 2022 ESRI User Conference In San Diego, California From

July 11- July 15.

RFBA- GIS OUT OF STATE CONFERENCE.PDF

ADMINISTRATION - RISK MANAGEMENT

1. Authorization For Signatures On An Agreement Between The State Of

Minnesota Department Of Natural Resources (DNR) And Wright

County. The Agreement Will Allow The DNR Use The Space Under The

Hangar Building Located At 505 County Road 37 NE Buffalo, MN

(Wright County Compost And Recycling Center).

WRIGHT COUNTY DNR AGREEMENT RFBA.PDFDNR LICENSE 489-FINAL.PDF

ATTORNEY

1. Refer New Position Of Assistant Civil Division Chief And County

Attorney Office Reorganization And Reclassification To The Personnel

Committee.

RFBA - NEW POSITION OF ASSISTANT CIVIL DIVISION CHIEF.PDF

TIMED AGENDA ITEMS

LINDSEY MEYER, ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE

1. Approve Absentee Ballot Board, Mail Ballot Absentee Ballot Board,

And UOCAVA Ballot Board Members For The 2022- 2023 Election

Cycle.

AGENDA 6-28 TIMED - RFBA APPROVE BALLOT BOARD APPOINTEES.PDF

JOHN BOWEN, ATTORNEY

1. Approve Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) For Inspection Of

Grandstand Bleachers At The Wright County Fairgrounds.

RFBA - TIMED ATTORNEY.PDFFAIRGROUND INSPECTION JPA.PDF

ADAM AUSTING, EXTENSION

1. Adopt A Resolution Proclaiming The Lambert Family As The Wright

County 2022 Farm Family Of The Year .

RFBA - EXTENSION OFFICE.PDFFARM FAMILY DECLARATION 2022 LAMBERT.PDF

PUBLIC HEARING FOR COUNTY DITCH #10

1. Public Hearing For County Ditch #10

RFBA - AG AND DRAINAGE_FINAL_PH.PDFWRIGHT CD 10 REALIGNMENT ENGINEERS REPORT.PDF

ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION

COMMITTEE MINUTES

1. Committee Of The Whole Minutes (06/20/2022)

2. Personnel/Employee Relations Minutes (06/22/2022)

06-20-2022 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES.PDFCOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING RECOMMENDATIONS.PDF06-22-2022 PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MINUTES PDF.PDFPERSONNEL MEETING RECOMMENDATIONS.PDF310 PTO POLICY - LINED COPY.PDF301 PTO POLICY - CLEAN COPY.PDF

ADVISORY COMMITTEE / ADVISORY BOARD UPDATES

ADJOURNMENT

WARRANTS ISSUED

06-13-2022 THRU 06-21-2022 WARRANTS ISSUED 2,592,043.15.PDF06-13-2022 THRU 06-21-2022 CLIENT WARRANTS ISSUED 170,592.15.PDF06-21-22 FIRST HALF DISTRIBUTION P TAX 47,681,173.84.PDF

BOARD AGENDA


JUNE 28, 2022

Christine Husom, District 1

Darek Vetsch, District 2

Mark Daleiden, District 3

Mary Wetter, District 4

Michael Kaczmarek, District 5

I. 9:00 A.M.

II.

A.

Documents:

III.

IV.

A.

Documents:

B.

Documents:

C.

Documents:

D.

Documents:

E.

Documents:

F.

Documents:

V.

A. 9:02 A.M.

Documents:

B. 9:07 A.M.

Documents:

C. 9:10 A.M.

Documents:

D. 9:30 A.M.

Documents:

VI.

A.

Documents:

VII.

VIII.

IX.

Documents:

https://www.co.wright.mn.us/d7891ab3-0c7f-4765-9fb2-3912d067cec4

BOARD MINUTES Christine Husom District 1 Darek Vetsch District 2 Mark Daleiden District 3 Mary Wetter District 4 Michael Kaczmarek District 5


JUNE 21, 2022

DATE APPROVED: [ ]

THESE MINUTES ARE IN DRAFT FORMAT AND REQUIRE APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY BOARD

The Wright County Board met in regular session at 9:01 A.M. with Husom, Vetsch, Daleiden, Wetter, and Kaczmarek present. COUNTY BOARD MINUTES 06-07-2022 Commissioner Mike Kaczmarek requested an edit on page 4 to say “I deferred to Commissioner Vetsch due to concerns stemming from his district.” Kaczmarek moved to approve the County Board minutes from Tuesday, June 7, 2022, with the suggested corrections. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mark Daleiden. The motion carried 5-0. AGENDA Daleiden moved to approve the Agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mary Wetter. The motion carried 5-0. CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Darek Vetsch moved to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item B4 to be moved to a timed agenda item for further discussion. The motion was seconded by Kaczmarek. The motion carried 5-0.

*Items removed for further discussion and placed in the timed agenda.

A. ADMINISTRATION 1. Authorize Signatures On Contract Extension With Crossroads Animal Shelter, To Continue The

Administrative Functions And Record The Keeping Of Dangerous Dogs. B. ADMINSTRATION – FINANCE

1. Acknowledge Warrants Issued Between June 1, 2022 And June 10, 2022. 2. Motion To Approve The Reimbursement Of The American Rescue Plan Act (ARP) Funds As Follows:

i. County ARP Funds: ii. Approval Of County Reimbursement Of $445.91 From 01-099- 493.6910 Transfer Out Into 01-

100-493.5910 Transfer In As Follows: 1. $445.91 For Administrative Expenses-Staff Costs

iii. Approval Of Use Of ARP Funds From 01-099-493-8433-6020. 1. $4,529.44 2.2 Household Assistance

3. Motion To Approve A Reimbursement For Money Spent In Connection With UCARE Dental Clinic. A Journal Entry Will Be Processed In The Amount Of $19,142.50 From 11-450-000-0000- 6910 Transfer Out Into 34-150-000-8216-5910 Transfer In.

4. *Approval Of Performance Management Resolution, And Acceptance Of The Performance Management Grant Application.

5. Approve Renewal Of Annual Club On-Sale, Off-Sale And Sunday Liquor License For CHD Ventures LLC - Trails End Pub For The License Period July 1, 2022 To June 30, 2023.

6. Approve Precious Metal Dealer License For Shaphan Kirkpatrick DBA National Gold Consultants (City Of Buffalo) For A One-Year Period.

7. Approve Renewal Of Annual Club Off-Sale Liquor License For David Olson DBA Olson's Truck Stop For The License Period July 1, 2022 To June 30, 2023.

8. Approve Renewal Of Annual Club On-Sale And Sunday Liquor License For Fountain Hill Winery & Vineyard For The License Period July 1, 2022 To June 30, 2023.

9. Approve Renewal Of Temporary 1-Day On-Sale Liquor License For Church Of St Mary Of Czestochowa

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 2 of 18

For Its Event On July 16th. C. AGRICULTURE & DRAINAGE

1. Approval Of The Contract Proposal For Phase 1 Diagnostic/Feasibility Study For 12-Mile Creek Water For ARP Project #8409.

D. PLANNING & ZONING 1. Accept The Findings And Recommendation Of The Planning Commission For The Following Request To

Rezone: i. KYLE ASHWILL - (Cokato Twp.) Commission Unanimously Recommends Approval Of The

Request To Rezone From AG General Agricultural To I-1 General Industry District. TIMED AGENDA ITEMS BARRY RHINEBERGER - PLANNING & ZONING Determination Of Need For An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) For Knife River Naaktgeboren Gravel Pit Expansion, Wright County, Minnesota. Environmental Health Supervisor Edward Pettit said the resolution had to do with the expansion of the Knife River Naaktgeboren pit in Silver Creek Township and the determination of need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Commissioner Christine Husom asked what his recommendation was. Pettit said the pit had been in operation since 1984 and it was expanded in 2017. which triggered the need for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). That document was prepared and the board determined in 2017 no further review was warranted, so an EIS was not prepared. The current proposal would be to expand the pit again, staying withing the permitted boundary. Rather than mining 10 acres that was previously permitted, the county would increase the mining to around 14 acres. Planning and Zoning Director Barry Rhineberger recommended proceeding with no EIS. Husom said it appears that another EIS is not needed. Assistant County Attorney Greg Kryzer said staff went through the proper channels and everything was satisfactory. All comments that were received have been given a response and Kryzer agreed that no EIS was needed at this time. This determination was an expansion of another EIS that had been done in 2017. Those completing the review of the expansion simply went outside the boundaries that were studied previously. Kryzer said he did not see any need at the staff level, but the final determination would be up the board. Rhineberger said he had made a few typographical corrections to resolutions so the new printouts the board was viewing was modestly different. Kaczmarek wanted to know if someone could address why this expansion would not be affected by the moratorium. Kryzer said this was a process that went under the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) rules, meaning this was the state agency rule under the EAW. This had nothing to do with the conditional use permit. It was a separate process. Rhineberger explained that this was the first stage and said the amendment would be coming forward with the conditional use permit application. Rhineberger explained that if there were any existing approved uses under the old language, any change would require an updated permit. Vetsch asked if there was an EAW or an EIS prior. Rhineberger said there was not. Pettit explained that this was a very involved process that could take years. The first step would be getting an EAW to see if there was potential for environmental effects. Vetsch moved to approve the resolution for the findings of fact, conclusions and order for no warranted need for EIS determination for Knife River Naaktgeboren Gravel Pit expansion. The motion was seconded by Daleiden. The motion carried 5-0. VIRGIL HAWKINS - HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Award Contract For The Otsego Truck Station Building Expansion. We Recommend Award Of The Base Bid To Rochon Corporation Of Osseo, MN In The Amount Of $1,441,000. County Highway Engineer Virgil Hawkins said the first recommendation was an award contract for the Otsego Truck Station building expansion. He had received bids on Tuesday, June 7 and there was a letter of recommendation from the architect in each board member’s packet with a bid summary. Hawkins recommended that the award of the base bid go to Rochon Corporation of Osseo, MN in the amount of $1,441,000. Daleiden asked what the addition would be. Hawkins said the Otsego Truck Station would be adding three bays to the shop. Originally part of it was going to be an enclosed salt brine storage area, but it was decided afterwards that the salt brine storage area be part of the Buffalo shop which was still part of the project but not part of this particular bid. Hawkins thought this would be completed before Winter 2022. Daleiden moved to approve the Award Contract for the Otsego Truck Station building expansion to be awarded to Rochon

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 3 of 18 Corporation of Osseo, MN in the amount of $1,441,000. The motion was seconded by Wetter. The motion carried 5-0.

Award Contract No. 2205, CSAH 19 Federal One-Way Pair Project (Subject To Authorization Of Award By The MnDOT Civil Rights Office). We Recommend Award Of Contract No. 2205 To be awarded to Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. Of Rogers, MN In The Amount OF $3,712,060.38. Hawkins said he received bids on Tuesday June 14, for contract No. 2205, CSAH 19 Federal One-Way Pair Project. Three bids with summaries were attached. He recommended to award Contract No. 2205 to Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. of Rogers. Daleiden noted that the county was very fortunate to get these bids as the bid amounts were incredibly low. Daleiden moved to approve the Award Contract No. 2205, CSAH 19 Federal One-Way Pair Project. The motion was seconded by Wetter. The motion carried 5-0. Acceptance Of The 2021 Highway Department Annual Report. The 2021 Highway Department Annual Report Was Distributed To The County Board On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 To Allow For Review By The County Board Members. Hawkins requested acceptance of the 2021 Highway Department Annual Report. The 2021 Highway Department Annual Report was distributed to the county board on Tuesday, May 31 to allow for review by the board members. He did not receive any comments, so he asked for acceptance. Kaczmarek said he sent an email regarding the difference in costs. There was a roundabout that was in the millions of dollars on page 11, but also a roundabout that was in the $400,000 range. Kaczmarek asked what was driving the price. Hawkins explained that when building roundabouts there were a lot of moving parts. In general, the cost has gone up for projects. He said the mini-roundabout in Delano was $600,000 and that the others were all in the $1 million range. The roundabout that was $400,000 was part of a federal grant and the total cost was not listed in that report. The 2021 report would however have a total amount. Some of the federal funding was put towards building these roundabouts. Hawkins said there was a lot of information in the packet. Daleiden asked about the construction on Highway 35 and Bison Blvd. Hawkins said there was a pre-construction meeting scheduled on Friday, June 24. Construction was scheduled to start the week of July 5 or July 11, depending on when the concrete pipe structures can be delivered. He hoped to open the road back up before school starts. Daleiden asked if there would be a detour in the interim. Hawkins said there would be signs out for the detour about a week before the construction starts. Wetter asked about the roundabouts that had a cement or flat middle. Hawkins said the flat ones are mini-roundabouts. They were created this way so that buses and trucks could drive over the top. The larger ones have the mounds that you do physically have to go around. They too have a larger shoulder a semi can use to make the turns. Kaczmarek made the comment that it would be beneficial to put out information explaining the design of the roundabouts so the public understood the cement piece through the middle was not an error. Hawkins explained that he preferred roundabouts because there is such great intersection control. Roundabouts greatly reduce and eliminate serious injuries and fatalities. Daleiden said this would be posted on the Highway Department’s website so the community could follow along with the construction. Daleiden moved to approve the acceptance of the 2021 Highway Department Annual Report. The motion was seconded by Vetsch. The motion carried 5-0. COMMISSIONERS Approval Of Performance Management Resolution, And Acceptance Of The Performance Management Grant Application. Assistant Finance Director Heather Lemieux said last year the county received $19,000 back in reimbursements. Daleiden and Husom thanked the Finance Department and recognized their efforts noting it won this award the last five years in a row.

Daleiden moved to approve Performance Management Resolution and acceptance of the Performance Management Grant Application. The motion was seconded by Vetsch. The motion carried 5-0. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION ADMINISTRATION Approve Addition To Committee Listing Husom said that with the addition of the Department of Employment Economic Development Energy Transition Advisory Committee, the board now had to appoint the members of the committee. There was a lot of time involved with this committee in particular, which was why it was being added to the list of per diems. Husom asked if the board would like to add the gravel work group to that per diem list as well. County Administrator Lee Kelly said the Energy Transition Advisory

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 4 of 18 Committee can be added to the per diems list. He said that typically this is a housekeeping item, but expanded this to an Item for Consideration in case there were other committees the board would like to add to that list. Kaczmarek said the Employee Retention Work Group, otherwise known as R.A.I.S.E. was also a meeting and asked if the board wanted to keep that. Vetsch explained that R.A.I.S.E. was staff group not a formalized group with minutes so it would not meet the criteria. Wetter brought up Environmental Health Work Group that she and Daleiden were on most of the work was done by Planning and Zoning. Daleiden said this would go through the end of the year. The next step would be to talk to restaurants and hotels to see if they were happy with the funding they are getting from the State or if they would prefer local representation and inspections. Vetsch mentioned timing can be crucial with getting inspections completed and that there were a lot of pieces involved with that. This next step would determine whether the board continues with this group. Vetsch asked that the board review the next set of minutes from the Environmental Health Work Group to be brought up to date on its status.

Vetsch moved to approve the addition to the committee listing. The motion was seconded by Wetter. The motion carried 5-0. COMMITTEE MINUTES Daleiden wanted to set a date for next week or the week after for citizen placement in each township. Vetsch knowing there are a lot of people wanting to apply wanted to get this scheduled as well. Board members discuss how they would like to move that meeting forward. Applications are due by noon Thursday, June 30, 2022. Assistant County Administrator Marc Mattice said so far there are five people from townships and three operators on the list. Wetter and Kaczmarek will be looking at applicant recommendations and letters from the township board at 1:00 p.m. Thursday, June 30. Mattice requested Wetter and Kaczmarek include someone from Planning and Zoning to help answer questions about logistics when deciding. The board is looking for two or three ideal candidates. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTES (06/07/2022) Husom referenced the section about the redetermination of benefits for Ditches 23 and 31. She asked that a change be made on Page 3, from the word “title” to “tile”. Top of Page four Vetsch would like “Vetsch saw we are devaluing it” to be “Vetsch said that the board was devaluating it”. Vetsch moved to approve the Committee of the Whole minutes from Tuesday, June 7. The motion was seconded by Kaczmarek. The motion carried 5-0.

I. Public Hearing for the Redetermination of Benefits on County Ditch #23 and County Ditch #31

Board Chair Christine Husom called the meeting to order at 1:02 p.m. and stated from a written document: This is a public hearing on the redetermination of benefits and damages on Wright County Ditch 10 under statutes section 103E.351.I would like to welcome everyone who has come today. Under consideration at this hearing is the redetermination of benefits and damages for Wright County Ditch 10 which includes the acquisition and valuation of buffer seeding areas. The purpose of this hearing is to review the viewer’s report and receive comment from those affected by or interested in the proposed redetermination of benefits and damages report. This is an evidentiary proceeding. The proceedings are being recorded in order to preserve the record. The presentation for each drainage system will be taken in numerical order. The order of business for the hearings will be as follows. First, the Drainage Authority’s legal will present the procedural and legal requirements. Following the staff presentation one of the viewers will make his presentation. After the viewer has made his presentation, I will open the hearing for public comment. The Board would like to hear your comments on the proposed redetermination of benefits and damages of the drainage system and any information relevant to that purpose. Specifically, the Board is interested in:

-Whether it is missing information used to define the public benefit, damage, or valuation. -The extent and basis of any benefits or damages. -Whether and how your land drains to the public system -Whether you have concerns with the soil classifications as presented by the viewers. -Whether the seeding and right of way acquisition area and valuation is correct or missing information. -Whether you have concerns or issues associated with any portion of the benefits of damages assessed to your property -Whether the recommended benefits and damages creates other material concerns the Board should consider prior to adopting the viewers report

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 5 of 18 Though information may be presented regarding the current condition of the drainage system, this hearing is not an appropriate time to discuss issues related to possible, future actions such as a repair unless the repair or lack of an ability to make a repair will alter the benefits or damages of the system. If repairs are warranted, the Drainage Authority will initiate separate proceedings to discuss those issues. However, if you have an immediate concern, we invite you to contact our drainage coordinator Matt Detjen. The purpose of this hearing is to review the viewer’s report. During the public hearing, commissioners may ask questions of staff or the viewers making presentations and of commenters, to clarify any testimony. In addition, if a member of the public asks a question and a commissioner believes that a response from the Drainage Authority staff or a viewer can readily resolve the question or enrich the testimony, the commissioner may ask me to have the appropriate staff member or viewer speak to the question. I will exercise my judgment as to whether to allow such discussion. However, commissioners’ expression of their positions and general discussion concerning the subject of the public hearing should be avoided during the public comment portion of the public hearing. Board discussion will occur after all members of the public have had a chance to speak and the public comment period has been closed. Board discussion may occur and be concluded at this or a subsequent meeting, as the Board decides. If a member of the public would like to make a comment, please stand and address the Board when I recognize you. Speak clearly and state your name and address for the record. If you have a specific question concerning the proposed viewers report, we may ask our drainage coordinator, one of the viewers or legal counsel to respond. If you have anything in writing you wish to submit, you can provide it to me before the close of the public comments and I will note its receipt in the record. To ensure that all wishing to comment on the proposed viewers report concerning the redetermination of benefits and damages of the public drainage system may have time to speak, I may limit the time any single speaker may comment to three minutes. Please limit redundant or repetitive comments. Would any of the board members wish to offer any further remarks before we begin?

Assistant County Attorney John A. Bowen spoke on behalf of the ditches located in Woodland Township stating: (DRAINAGE SUPERVISOR COMMENTS FOR HEARING REESTABLISHMENT OF BENEFITS AND DAMAGES Wright County Ditches 23 and 31 (103E.351) 1. This is a public hearing on the redetermination of benefits and damages of Wright County Ditches 23 and 31. These drainage systems are located Woodland Township, Wright County. The drainage area is mainly developed and guided for agricultural use . 2. As part of his analysis of the drainage system, the viewers have provided the Drainage Authority with a report showing the following: A description of the lot or tract, under separate ownership, that is benefited or damaged; The names of the owners as they appear on the current tax records of the county and their addresses; The number of acres in each tract or lot; The number and value of acres added to a tract or lot by the proposed drainage of public water; The damage, if any, to riparian rights; The damages paid for the permanent strip of perennial vegetation under MN ST section 103E.021;The total number and value of acres added to a tract or lot by the proposed drainage of public waters, wetlands, and other areas not currently being cultivated. The number of acres and amount of benefits being assessed for drainage of areas that would be considered conversion of a wetland under United States Code, title 16, section 3821, if the area was placed in agricultural production; The amount of right-of-way acreage required; and The amount that each tract or lot will be benefited or damaged. 3. In order to properly manage the drainage system in a way that recognizes its intended, beneficial public functions, the Drainage Authority initiated proceedings to redetermine the benefits and damages over the system. The Board initiated the redetermination of benefits and damages process by resolutions adopting findings and orders dated July 26, 2016. 4. The Drainage Authority adopted the Resolution because the original benefits or damages do not reasonably reflect current land values or because the benefited or damaged areas have changed. 5. Pursuant to the requirements of 103E.351 sub, 2, the Board mailed notice of this final hearing to all property owners benefited or damaged by the drainage systems. The viewers report was mailed to the property owners. Other interested parties were provided notice by publication in the Howard Lake Herald Journal. Evidence of all notices are on file with the Drainage Authority. 6. Substantive comments received during today’s hearing, if any, may be incorporated into the final findings for the Board. 7. Evidence of all actions in this matter, including the viewers report, preliminary orders, appointments, oaths, affidavits of mailing, publication or posting as well as hearing agendas and presentation materials shall be considered the record of proceedings in this matter. 8. At this hearing, the viewers will present their report. The viewers will also provide an explanation of the process and information used to determine the benefits and damages and valuation and acquisition of the right-of-way of the drainage systems. 9. The intent of this proceeding is to confirm the benefits and damages and the benefited and damaged areas and to also acquire any permanent strips of perennial vegetation under Minn. Stat. § 103E.02

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 6 of 18 10. The redetermined benefits and damages will be used in all subsequent proceedings relating to the drainage systems. 11. Based on your comments and testimony today, the Drainage Authority may make one or more of the following decisions:

a. Rise and report to the full board an order accepting the redetermination the benefits and damages as described in the viewer’s report.

b. Direct the viewers to further review the area or portions of the drainage systems and determine if adjustments should be

made to the proposed benefits and damages and perennial strips of vegetation. c. Rise and report to the full board that it adopt an order rejecting the viewers report and directing a new report be

conducted. d. Direct the viewers to make adjustments and submit a revised report.

12. As requested by the Drainage Authority, please limit your comments to the Redetermination of benefits and damages. Comments related to repair of the drainage system are not germane to this public hearing unless the repair or lack of ability to make the repair will alter the benefit or damages of the system. 13. The decision standard for the Board is whether, based on the proceedings herein, the evidence presented at this hearing and the testimony of the viewers and the public, the Board finds that the viewers report accurately reflects the benefits and damages of the watershed for Wright County Ditches 23 and 31. Minnesota Drainage Viewers Stearns County Director, John Cunningham took the stand. His assistants Vernon Ruschmeyer and Richard Kvols were present. Cunningham started this project in Spring 2020. He was told not to do any work on 23 initially. At the beginning of this year Cunningham met with the President of the Viewers Association, Ron Ringquist, and reevaluated the numbers in the agricultural business. Cunningham stated he would need the board to consider how much would be needed for the buffer payments. Cunningham went on to discuss Ditch 23, referencing print out “Wright County Drainage Authority” which was attached for viewing. Ditch 23 is located east of Lauzers Lake and drains into this lake. He explained that 516 acres were assigned benefits. Cunningham went said this ditch was established in 1915. The viewing process includes using a cell survey, maps of Wright County, Geographic Information System (GIS), aerial photos and data, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), United States College of Farm Management records, sales from county auditors, the Center for Farm Financial Management at the U of MN in St. Paul that keeps track of farm sales in each county, Cunningham did his best to view these ditches himself without damaging any crops in the process. There was an engineer hired to look at Ditch 31 because there were no records available. Each parcel was looked at to see if it was an A, B, C or D soil which shows the value of the land before there was a ditch. Then consideration is made for what ditch receives benefits. “A” Standing water or cattails, wetland classification with a market value for agricultural purposes of $0.00 per acre, economic productivity of $0.00.

“ B” Seasonally flooded/pasture ground. Pasture classification with a market value of $1,000.00 to $1,500.00 per acre, economic productivity of $60.00 based on grazing days and/or hay values.

“ C” Wet subsoil -- Marginal crop land, low to medium crop land classification with a market value of $4,000.00 to $5,000.00 per acre, annual economic productivity of $170.24 based upon average annual yield of 82 percent of optimum with $261.76 production costs. “D” Upland areas not needing artificial drainage but irregular in shape and intermixed with wetter soils. Medium to high cropland classification with a market value of $4,500.00 to $7,000.00 per acre, annual economic productivity of $251.24 based upon average annual yield of 95 percent of optimum with $261.76 production costs. Cunningham showed an image of Ditch 23. When ditch 23 was originally built, the farmers wanted the 40 acres to be a tile situation. But there was an open ditch through the low land. There was a portion of the land Cunningham referenced on his maps, saying there would be no repairs in that section so that was considered, and benefits were lowered. The ditch inspector said he opted Option 4 from the engineer’s report. The A ground was only going to get 25 percent of the potential benefits because the water was not going to move well out of that ditch, 35 percent on B acres, 50 percent on C, and 50 percent on D acres. This calculation is done using a proximity rating, normally if you are right on a ditch, you are 100 percent, meaning you don’t have to spend any more money to get the water to the ditch because you are right on it. If a landowner was located farther away, the viewer measures 85 percent for the first 40 acres, and then 70 percent, 65 percent,50 percent, 40 percent, etc. Some ditches we went as low as 5 percent. Commissioner Mark Daleiden asked that we open to the public about Ditch 23 before discussion about Ditch 31. Bowen agreed that working on Ditch 23 hearing was the best plan of action. Husom opened the floor for discussion. There was no one who asked to

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 7 of 18 speak. Husom closed the floor to public comments at 1:26 p.m. Husom invited Agriculture and Drainage Coordinator Matthew Detjen to comment. Detjen said that with the informational meetings with landowners there were a lot of questions raised on proximity rate. Detjen asked if Cunningham could explain this more in depth so that those present could have a better understanding. Commissioner Darek Vetsch asked about Option 3 or 4, seeing that it has adjusted values because of the portion that will not see repair because of circumstances with the culverts and things of that nature and Dretjen confirmed this. Husom asked Cunningham for an explanation about the adjustments that were made. Vetsch asked how Cunningham had come to that conclusion. Vetsch liked the methodology of it but wanted more of an explanation because this was a new methodology versus what was used in the past. Vetsch saw that the board was devaluing rather than paying damages. Cunningham said there would be no damages unless a landowner’s property was touching the edges. Landowners will not be farming the land with their crops anymore. The land will still stay an A,B,C,or D , the percentage of what the homeowner pays is what was changing. In Cunningham’s opinion, the water will not go out of Lauzers Lake. He said it would not do the owner much good, so this was why the amount of benefits landowners will get was reduced to make this area any different there would need be an improvement project which would need to be addressed at another time. Reestablishing the benefits and looking at what it was, not what it could be. Cunningham said if an engineer put the ditch back to its original condition it wouldn’t be adequate to drain the amount of water that its being asked of at this time. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare findings and an order consistent with the proceedings, including responses to all comments received through the public comment process; that the draft findings and order be written to affect the redetermination of benefits and damages of the public drainage system consistent with the viewer’s report and recommendation; direct recording of the order to reflect the redetermination of benefits and damages of the public drainage system record; and that we rise and report this matter to the Board’s regular meeting, at which meeting we will consider findings and an order for the proposed viewer’s report on the redetermination of benefits and damages of the public drainage system records.

Motion made by Vetsch, seconded by Commissioner Mike Kaczmarek. Husom clarified that the board is acting as the drainage authority and findings would be sent to the county board for review. Detjen wanted to clarify if the board was taking the viewers recommendation for acquisitions for the buffer strip and the amount they presented or if it wanted to set a different amount. Vetsch recommended adopting the viewer’s buffer. Daleiden wanted to know what the recommendation of the buffer was. Cunningham read on Ditch 23 there was one parcel that was valued at $3,000, one at $2,500, another at $700, and another as low as $500. Daleiden wanted to know for the highest value, how many acres that was. He wanted to make sure what the assessors had was accurate and similar, to avoid issues down the road. Cunningham said there had been times where one ditch remained the same price all the way through. Vetsch wanted to know about areas that can be used to explain other uses, where a land assessor may not see this same value. Husom agreed that higher valued land would cost more. Detjen said a buffer strip for wetland would be different than prime farmland in regard to price. From what he had seen of what the viewers proposed, this was an accurate evaluation. Husom wanted to confirm that Vetsch and Kaczmarek were still in favor knowing that the motion did not include the buffers. Both agree that the motion should include this. Cunningham said there was a total of 4,500 acres, of which 2,690 were assigned benefits on Ditch 31. Both ditches went through the same process to find value. There were some small areas specifically at the end of a ditch 31 where there was disagreement regarding where the ditch actually ended because of the water running two directions. Cunningham drew a line to divide the two ditches. Some of the water ran east and the rest ending in the ditch. This would be shown when Cunningham had the official outline drawn. Cunningham illustrated this with the maps he brought for his report. There is a five to eight acre change on both sides of the line he had drawn. Both owners on either side were happy with what was done. Cunningham referred to the handout that explained the established estimate of County Ditch 31.

“A” Seasonally ponded agricultural ground. Low cropland classification with a market value of range of $ 4,000.00 to $5,000.00 per acre, annual economic productivity of $252.34 based upon average annual yield of 80 percent of optimum with $293.45 production costs. “B” Occasionally flooded agricultural ground. Medium cropland classification with a market value range of $5,500.00 to $6,500.00 per acre, economic productivity of $306.95 based upon three average annual yield of 88 percent of optimum with $293.46 production costs. “C” Wet subsoil. Medium high cropland classification with a market value range of $6000.00 to $7500.00 per acre, annual economic productivity of $361.50 based upon average annual yield of 96 % of optimum with $293.46 production costs. “D” Upland areas not needing artificial drainage, but irregular in shape and intermixed with wetter

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 8 of 18

soils. Medium to high cropland classification with a market range value of $6,500.00 to $8,000 per acre, annual economic productivity of $381.97 based upon average yield of 99 percent optimum with $293.46 production costs.

The benefits for 80 acres are 50 percent, 75 percent on B, 90 percent on C, and 95 percent on D because the ditch would work adequately when fixed to its original state. Cunningham used a map to show the ditch on west side of the lake has to channel water. Cunningham said the proximity had been changed by 5 percent because the benefit value is reduced because the water will not run the way it should. The water ran into the two lakes. There was a discrepancy with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR.) Older photos do not show this ever-holding water. There is standing water and Cunningham wanted more confirmation from the DNR that it was officially a lake. Cunningham said that the way he understood it, if no repairs had been made on a ditch in 25 years then it may be hard to make a change with the DNR. He added that he was grateful to have the help of an engineer on this project. The numbers had been changed since the January 2022 meeting buffer on Ditch 31. The increase was about 3.75 percent per acre which made sense at the beginning of this process. The value was now $3,670 per acre. Daleiden said it was necessary to keep homeowners. Evaluations were much higher than $3,670 as the Assessor’s Office was valued consistent for around $6,000 per tillable acre. Larry Broll spoke to Waverly Bank about land evaluation and was told per acre it was $7.500 with room for value fluctuation. Daleiden wanted to keep it fair and go with what the Assessor’s Office said is the valuation standard. Husom opened the public hearing for Ditch 31 at 1:50 p.m. Doris Schendel of Waverly asked if the viewer report was updated as of Thursday, June 2 after the Woodland Town Hall meeting. Cunningham said this was updated as of June 3. She asked if the buffers that were already in place were correct for every parcel located on Ditch 31. Cunningham said the payments were the same. She wondered who did the work on the buffers that are non-compliant. Daleiden answered Wright County’s ditch inspectors took care of this. Detjen explained that the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) Office does the inspection portion of Minnesota Statute 103F Buffer Law and he himself did the enforcement actions through Wright County. Schendel asked what the current account was on Ditch 31. Agriculture and Drainage Specialist Janice Edmonson said on Ditch 31 there was some engineering work done through Huston engineering and the county was at about $85,000 into this project, which included the redetermination. Daleiden confirmed that this included the engineering that was done because there were no current records and it needed to be reestablished. Vetsch said some of the cost may have Viewer’s work, costs, assessment of ditches based on linear miles and the cost of drainage. Vetsch asked Detjen if there had been any major projects done on Ditch 31 and if so what the incurred costs were. Detjen said before doing any new work, he would have to assess the benefits with the new landowners not the original ones. Husom added that was why it was prudent to wait until repairs were due so it was more fair. Larry Broll of Waverly said he had lost two years of payments on his repairs. He wanted to understand how it could be partially owned by the county even though the county did not make payments. He said there was five feet where Ditch 31 crossed County Road 30 and he wondered if the county would utilize that space to drain more water. He felt that he was paying too much money for what he was getting. He suggested culverts as there were a lot of ditches that cleaned themselves but culverts on County Road 8 and County Road 30 is a sediment trap. He wanted the culverts taken care of on the main roads. He explained that his last bill was high and he cleans all his trees out. Broll thought that the job could have been done during the dry summer in 2021. Also there was a homemade bridge that his grandfather built that was eroding underneath, so he had to put in a new six-foot culvert and he was wondering what the county would do when they clean the ditch out. He wanted to know if the county would replace the culvert. Husom reminded Broll that repairs would have to be discussed at another meeting specific to repairs. The state had determined that the county had to have buffers on the drainage systems. Husom described reasons that change, and why there is a need to redetermine. Once the redetermination was adopted there would be another meeting about repairs, topography, culverts and drainage. Vetsch reiterated that once the public hearing and committee meeting was completed there would another board meeting for repairs. Waverly resident Robert Bakeberg said information that had been presented earlier in which ditches were now being used to drain more water than they were ever intended to. Bakeberg wanted to know if he would receive paperwork saying he would retain ownership of the land after multiple payments. He wanted to make sure his land would not turn into public property. Daleiden asked Detjen about ownership laws. Detjen responded saying it was an easement. Bakeberg mentioned Ditch 31 already had $85,000 put into it and wanted to know if there would be another engineering study. Bakeberg said he had no say in whether there would be another study done. Husom said there would have to be another public hearing to discuss repairs. Bakeberg wanted to know what the next steps would be after this hearing. Daleiden said it depended on the benefitted landowners. He said the board would not do anything unless there was a request for repairs. Vetsch explained that there were repair requests on the system. That was why there was a cost estimate of $200,000. This proposal was a high level proposal. As long as the proposal was adopted and as long as the repair request were still valid, the engineer showed an estimate and a hearing would take place. Waverly resident Tracy spoke on behalf of County Road 30 residents as well. Her farm is south of this large area of water which did

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 9 of 18 not drain. She expressed her frustration that only part of the ditch was being benefitted. She wanted to know where the missing land was. Cunningham explained he was working with the DNR to see if trees can be taken out. Bakeberg asked, If Ditch 23 asked for a cleaning would the cleaning also include Ditch 31 because they were connected. Detjen said only the landowner could request a cleanup unless there was a cleanup initiated by the board. Vetsch said the county would not be doing further engineering as there was already a full report that had been adopted. Doris Schendel asked if there was a cost on buffers that were already there on 31. Cunningham confirmed that there was buffer included in the $85,000. Husom closed public comments at 2:15 p.m. Kaczmarek explained that Ditch 23 and Ditch 31 were not considered the same ditch because both ditches were established on different dates and different years which was why they are separate. If the ditches were one in the same, then a decision on one would affect the other. Edmonson stood to clarify that the $85,000 mentioned earlier was for expenditures that had already occurred. The buffer damages were not included in that total and had not been paid out yet. Vetsch asked what the buffer per acreage would be. Cunningham answered that the $85,167 total damages at $ 3,670, which was about 23 acres. He told Husom that by changing for $6,000 per acre that would add $53,000 to the existing $85,167. Vetsch thought for the equality factor there should be a tier one and tier two system in place. Daleiden agrees adding that the assessors would need to involve. He asked Assistant County Attorney Greg Kryzer if it would be possible to make a tier benefit system. Kryzer said the board is able to accept the report as written or has the option to amend it for specific reasons. Daleiden and Kryzer said Viewers should do this work along with the assessors. Kaczmarek, thanked the members of the public who showed up. He said the viewer report was very confusing and the board should be able to easily look and see a percentage of the cost. There was also a maintenance cost to consider. It would be helpful for residents to see percentages for repairs that each resident will be responsible for. The public should have been given a map when they left so that they could go home and evaluate what was discussed at the meeting. Cunningham noted that the board may have to amend the contract to obtain such a map. Kaczmarek thought the board should amend to have a map for the contract. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare findings and an order consistent with the proceedings, including responses to all comments received through the public comment process; that the draft findings and order be written to affect the redetermination of benefits and damages of the public drainage system consistent with the viewer’s report and recommendation; direct recording of the order to reflect the redetermination of benefits and damages of the public drainage system record; and that we rise and report this matter to the Board’s regular meeting, at which meeting the board will consider findings and an order for the proposed viewer’s report on the redetermination of benefits and damages of the public drainage system records. Motion made by Vetsch, the motion was seconded by Daleiden and carried 5-0.

COUNTY BOARD WORKSHOP (06/14/2022) Kaczmarek wanted to make a change to the minutes on Page 4. Before the recommendation it noted that Kaczmarek wanted to follow up with department heads about the recommendation on Page 4. Kaczmarek wanted to confirm that his recommendation was to have the agenda posting deadline be 12 p.m. Thursdays. In the interim, Vetsch suggested the deadline for agenda posting be moved to end of day Thursdays. Husom agreed with this recommendation. Kelly said he discussed these items with his team and holiday deadlines were not a problem. He explained that having recently hired new staff, administration was working on getting staff trained and proficient. Kelly said he had ideas he would like to share at the next Leadership Meeting and discuss processes to make things run more smoothly. Kelly said he was working on the back side to create a new agenda posting program. There were a lot of variables in place to make the deadline work for 12:00 p.m. Thursdays. Husom said there are a lot of things that need to get done in order to get minutes out and it takes a lot of time. Kelly said his staff would strive to have minutes done by end of day Thursdays. Daleiden suggested this deadline be reevaluated at the Workshop in September. Kelly mentioned the board adjusting the amount of meetings to two a month and Vetsch said now would be a good time to bring that idea forward. He wanted to make the best use of the board and staff’s time by possibly minimizing the amount of meetings per month. Vetsch understood that by pushing up the deadline for minutes the board was asking minute takers to cut out eight hours of work to meet this deadline. He added that having the agenda in front of the board members in a timely fashion would be helpful when reviewing notes. Husom agreed that this was a big ask of minute takers. Kaczmarek moved to approve the recommendations made in County Board Workshop from Tuesday, June 14. The motion was seconded by Daleiden. The motion carried 5-0. Vetsch moved to approve the County Board Workshop minutes from Tuesday, June 14. The motion was seconded by Daleiden. The motion carried 5-0.

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 10 of 18 The Wright County Board met for a workshop session at 9:00 A.M. with Husom, Vetsch, Daleiden, Kaczmarek and Wetter present. I. Schedule Meetings as Needed County Administrator Lee Kelly asked to follow up on the items that were removed from the County Board Workshop agenda at the prior County Board Meeting. He wanted to schedule a Committee of the Whole meeting to discuss American Rescue Plan (ARP) Program updates as well as to review the results from the Community Health assessment survey. Staff recommendations for a meeting date included Monday, June 20 or Wednesday, June 22 in the afternoon or Thursday, June 30 in the morning. Commissioner Christine Husom suggested adding these conversations to the Committee of the Whole meeting at 10 a.m. Monday, June 20. The remaining board members agreed this would be a good time for these discussions. Kelly said the next meeting that needed to be scheduled was the Broadband Committee meeting. There was a Request for Information (RFI) that would be coming back to the committee on Friday, July 15 and recommended scheduling the meeting for the following week. Commissioner Darek Vetsch agreed and suggested scheduling a meeting the following week based on how much time staff needed to digest the information received from the RFI. Commissioner Mark Daleiden suggested 9 a.m. Monday, July 25. The remaining board members agreed on this date and time. Kelly wanted to address the Gravel Subcommittee that was presented at the June 7 County Board meeting. Vetsch did not want to schedule a meeting for this subcommittee until there were solidified members named. He added that there would most likely not be a meeting until the third week of July. Kelly said he would keep this topic as a reminder item to be addressed at a later date. Daleiden asked about the Compost Facility discussion and where the board was at with this process. Kelly said the report had been delayed and followed up by saying there should be a discussion scheduled in July regarding this topic. Daleiden suggested adding this conversation to the County Board Workshop agenda in July. Commissioner Mike Kaczmarek said he had met with Inspector Tony Kuhn who had done a mock Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) inspection the week prior and thought he would have his report prepared by the following week. He suggested they combine the results of this inspection with the other inspection in order to review these findings at one time. The members of the board agreed that this would be added as an agenda item at the next County Board Workshop meeting at 9 a.m. Tuesday, July 12. RECOMMENDATION: Add the Community Health assessment survey results and ARP program update discussion topics to the Committee of the Whole Meeting agenda scheduled for 10 a.m. Monday, June 20. Schedule the next Broadband Committee Meeting for 9 a.m. Monday, July 25. Add the Compost Facility discussion topic to the County Board Workshop agenda at 9 a.m. Tuesday, July 12. II. Fair Board Bathroom Building Discussion Wright County Fair Board Vice President Jerry Quaal thanked the board for its time and introduced himself and his colleagues attending the meeting, Fair Board President Ward Westphal and Fair Board Treasurer Jeff Wheeler. Quaal explained that the Fair Board knew there were a few issues with the restrooms that had come up over the past few years that now needed to be addressed. The discussion regarding the restroom issues started November 2021. The following fix-it items were approved at the most recent Fair Board meeting. The first item discussed was the need to install vents in one restroom. There was a ventilation system installed that was pushing air into the attic without a way to properly ventilate it out of the space. The Fair Board received an estimate of $2,400 but wanted to seek out one more estimate to compare before making the decision to move forward with the project. The Fair Board agreed that it needed to be fixed before the 2022 Wright County Fair July 20-24. The second point of discussion was the issue of the fans that had been placed on the floor to dry the moisture collected on the floor caused by people drying their hands with the hand dryers. It was decided that it would be safer to have fans on the ceiling instead of on the floor of the restroom. The cost of this project was around $800, and the Fair Board planned to mount the fans itself. The third point of discussion had to do with a water drainage issue in the lower restrooms. These specific restrooms were used by several hundred campers, 4-H members, and Future Farmers of America (FFA) members who would visit the fair each year. This is where the kids in these organizations would get ready as well as where the campers would hook up and use the shower rooms and restrooms. The sheer volume was causing a major issue. The Fair Board had already broke concrete, received the correct permits for this project, and had the drains installed. That specific project had already been addressed and completed. The fourth item was to replace the women’s sanitary containers in the restrooms. This project cost was $500, and it was already being taken care of by the Fair Board. The fifth item was the need to replace showerheads, which Quaal explained was an easy fix and would be around $100 per showerhead to replace. The sixth item was the replacement of several toilet seats and other small maintenance items which the Fair Board maintenance staff had taken care of on its own. The Fair Board wanted assistance from the county to replace the hand dryers in the restrooms because the current ones did not work properly. The quote received estimated the hand dryers to be $800 per unit, so the Fair Board budgeted $1,000 per unit. There was also the cost consideration of bringing an electrician in to install the hand dryers. The Fair Board thought that was too much to spend on its own. Quaal explained that since the last Fair Board meeting, the distributor had informed the Fair Board that if the county was involved, his company would be able to drop the price per unit to around $600. The significant price reduction and the want to complete this purchase and installation before the 2022 County Fair in July were what spurred the assistance request to the county board. Husom asked if the hand dryers would be the model that one can stick their hands into to dry them or if they were the traditional dryer that blew air downward causing water to drop on the floor. Quaal did not specify which type of hand dryer they were

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 11 of 18 but said that the reason they wanted to look into hand dryers was to cut down on waste at the fair. He added that there were some paper towel rolls left to use and the Fair Board wanted to keep a few paper towel dispensers to use up the remaining supply. Quaal explained that the end goal was to move away from the paper towels completely. The paper towel dispensers they had at the restrooms were old and needing to be frequently replaced. It was an expensive and inefficient option when considering the alternative of new hand dryers. Husom suggested having paper towels available for fairgoers who preferred towels over hand dryers, as well as for those who had a need to use them as napkins or for other cleanup purposes. Vetsch asked Quaal what the expectation for funding from the county would be. Quaal said the Fair Board had originally wanted to install 14 hand dryers, one in each restroom. When the Fair Board looked into how many new dryers were actually needed, it concluded that 10 were needed which would be one hand dryer per sink. Assistant County Administrator Clay Wilfahrt explained that part of the reason that this was being brought up was due to the change in practice of how the County Board works with the Fair Board. When Wilfahrt spoke with the county legal team, he learned that since the county owned the buildings at the fairgrounds, the county would be exempt of sales tax if the county bought and installed the hand dryers. He explained that the change was that the county did not typically purchase or install anything at the fairgrounds, and this was why they were coming forward with this request. Wilfahrt said that the Fair Board would like these funds to come out of next year’s allocation rather than come out of its current allocation. Husom asked if the funds would be subtracted from next year’s allocation. Wilfahrt confirmed it would and added that he had spoke with the county finance team and it had said it was a feasible request. Husom said she would be comfortable approving this request. Kaczmarek asked how much the county would save in sales taxes if the county took on this project and what the dollar amount would be for installation. Wilfahrt said he did not have an exact dollar amount but that it would be around $600 per unit with the additional shipping costs. In regard to the electrician and installation cost, he explained that Facilities Director Alan Wilczek would need access to the building in person in order to come up with a concrete estimate for the board. Kaczmarek asked Quaal if he was comfortable taking this on and moving the projected completion date to before the 2023 County Fair. Quaal confirmed he was okay with this. He added that the rest of the projects he had presented in the beginning of the meeting were already approved at the last Fair Board meeting. The total cost for those approved projects was around $6,700, adding that $1,000 of that cost would be the cost to replace the paper towel dispensers. If the board approved the new hand dryers the Fair Board may not have to spend the $1,000 on replacing the paper towel dispensers. Kaczmarek asked if the $6,700 would come out of the 2022 allocation and Quaal confirmed this was correct. Kaczmarek asked if the Fair Board had a preference of whether it purchase the paper towel dispensers or try to move forward with the hand dryers before the 2022 County Fair. Wilfahrt said the dryers would take about two weeks to receive once they had been ordered and asked Wilczek to speak on the timeframe for installation. Wilczek said he could not give the board an estimated timeframe until he saw the buildings himself as he had to take into consideration circuits, power sources, conduits, and other details that would affect the project timeline. He also explained that the supplier’s discount to the county was simply in regard to the sales tax exemption. Wilczek said there were no other suppliers to compare the cost to. He wanted to know if the county board’s intention was to have staff do installs and be more hands on with the fairground buildings and projects going forward. Husom was not sure if staff should log their hours and that be subtracted from the cost of the project or if there was a better way to account for this work in order to be fair to the taxpayers. Kaczmarek pointed out it was the county’s building and property. He said that what needed to be decided was whether the Fair Board wanted to get this hand dryer project done before the 2022 County Fair. Vetsch said that he did not want this project to set a precedent that the board would take on projects and installations going forward pointing out that it was ultimately the Fair Board’s fair, revenue, expenses, and responsibility to handle on its own with the allocation the county provided. He clarified that he supported this project for the cost savings but emphasized that it was the fair’s revenue and cost and responsibility going forward. Daleiden asked if Quaal had received an estimate from a local electrician for installation. Quaal said he had not had an electrician look at the project since he thought the Fair Board would not have been able to afford the project in 2022. Daleiden was curious to find out what a local electrician would charge for installation. In addition, he wanted to have Wilczek visit to the location to see what the amperes and other electrical and technical specifications were. Daleiden thought there were too many unknown pieces of the project to have it completed before the 2022 fair. Daleiden asked if the wiring was underground at the fair. Quaal did not know if there was enough power at the location now to accommodate for the hand dryers that were in the restrooms currently. Daleiden reiterated that he wanted this project done after the 2022 fair so that the project was not rushed. Westphal said the power in the restrooms would be sufficient for the project since there were already hand dryers installed at those locations. He also noted that there was a power source close that would be able to be tapped into if necessary. Westphal said his intention was to meet with an electrician to get a better idea of the cost. Husom thought it would be good to have the electrician and Wilczek out to the property at the same time to coordinate. Wilfahrt summarized that the board’s intention was to receive cost estimates for installation by a private electrician and one for installation by county staff. While the estimates were getting collected, Wilfahrt said he would get the hand dryers ordered. Finally, he confirmed with the board that this project did not need to be completed before the upcoming 2022 fair. Husom confirmed this was the board’s intention. RECOMMENDATION: Obtain estimates for hand dryer installation from a local private electrician and from county staff. Order

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 12 of 18 10 hand dryers for the fairground restrooms and wait until after the 2022 County Fair for installation. III. 2023 Budget Forecast Auditor-Treasurer Bob Hiivala presented the financial forecast with the assistance of a handout he provided. Hiivala explained that the goal of the forecast was to avoid the spike in the tax rate that the county had experienced a few years prior. He said there was no projected inflation in the 2023 debt service as it was a fixed amount. 2023 would be a union negotiation year and several factors were built into the forecast to include general range movements, insurance, and new staff. Personnel and personnel-related expenses accounted for 50 percent of the overall operating expenses. Hiivala said there were also other factors to consider to include software and software update costs, fuel and utility costs, and the impact of inflation on operating supplies. This brought him to the projected Consumer Price Index (CPI) of 8.3 percent. He anticipated that the tax rate would actually go down and the tax capacity was projected to increase by 20 percent. Hiivala explained that this forecast was a consideration without seeing the departments’ individual budgets for the coming year. Vetsch did not think the tax rate projection was correct because he thought that only new construction would increase the tax rate. Finance Director Lindsey Meyer distributed a handout to the board that showed the real impact on specific parcels. She started by comparing historical data that assessors had submitted to the state. She had found a correlation between the estimated market value compared to tax capacity and found that on trends over the last few years. She was comfortable saying that there would be a 20.64 percent tax capacity increase. County Assessor Tony Rasmuson’s team looked at what the estimated market value of the new construction would be and in conjunction with the 20.64 percent tax capacity increase, the increase came out be 2.13 percent. Vetsch pointed out that this was the number that he wanted to capture for a more accurate projection. He added that everyone would see an increase in their taxes in 2023. Meyer added that this was why the tax rate was proposed to decrease down to 38 percent. Meyer showed a comparison that was done between the 2022 tax statement and the projection for the 2023 tax year. Vetsch pointed out that this was the shift from the residential to commercial. Meyer explained that there would be an increase in the residential tax rate and a decrease in the commercial tax rate. She also showed that there would be a projected decrease in the residential agriculture tax rate and the commercial agriculture tax rate. Vetsch asked if this was based on the levy of 6.27 percent and Meyer confirmed this was correct. Meyer provided three pages of tax impact comparisons that showed if values would have remained stagnant, there would have been a 12 percent tax decrease. She clarified that the numbers presented were all estimates. Vetsch added that if housing prices level off this would also have an impact on the projection. These projections provided the ability for the market to right itself and did not want to have a negative effect on the residents in the short term. Daleiden noted that there would be a closed session coming up regarding union negotiations, where the board would get a better idea of the specific projections. He added that the current presentation had theoretical numbers provided to assist with the preparation for the closed session. Husom clarified that nothing would be approved at the meeting that day and that the 2023 Budget Forecast was simply an informational presentation. Kaczmarek asked how Hiivala came to the number of $8,870,000 for the Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) for the 2022 Amended Budget. Hiivala explained that this number was based off the projects that were approved. He added that there was a direct correlation between project costs and revenue. If the project costs were higher, the revenue would be as well. Vetsch explained that the county would always take in more than it would spend. He explained that they only wanted to budget into the forecasting the money coming in versus money going out. Daleiden added that some of the money would be set aside for the 2023 budget and that number would vary each year. IV. Hybrid & Flex-Work Discussion Assistant County Administrator Marc Mattice presented the Hybrid and Flex-Work proposal to the board. He explained that he had started to work on this concept with the Human Resources Department. Mattice explained that this topic was discussed at the Leadership Team meeting Thursday, June 2 and he had gathered a lot of good feedback from department heads. What he wanted to know from the board was whether it was interested in approving this topic to be explored further by staff. He added that he wanted some guidance from the board in regard to the scope of this alternative working model for the county. Mattice understood that there was a lot that went into this policy and reiterated that he simply wanted to know if the board was interested in pursuing this option for employees. Husom thought that it was important to look at all the different options. She referenced when the county first sent 12 employees from the Health and Human Services Department to work from home. After a designated period of time the department reassessed and found that those 12 employees were more efficient when able to work from home. Husom wanted to consider what was best for both the county residents and the employees. Daleiden thought that the county had a flex-policy in place already that enabled employees to work between the hours of 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. He thought it was imperative to look further into this hybrid working model for the employees’ sake. Vetsch thought that in the current labor market, the county had to be more progressive in regard to a workplace structure. He thought this topic was especially important when it came to recruitment and retention. He wanted to add the conversation of changing the hours of operation for the county building itself. Husom and Daleiden agreed that the building hours of

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 13 of 18 operation was an important topic to revisit as well. Vetsch wanted to hear recommendations from staff at a future meeting. Husom thought it was important to work with department heads and consider the needs within their specific departments when it came to in-person work schedules. Vetsch requested that the board and Mattice work together to take on one issue at a time in order to facilitate changes in small increments, rather than make numerous big changes all at one time. Daleiden suggested these discussions be heard at the Personnel and Employee Relations Committee meetings in regular occurrence. Mattice agreed and explained that he would recommend changes and updates to policy in small increments while working with Human Resources and the board. He explained how each department would have different requirements for its employees in regard to any policy changes regarding hybrid and flex working schedules. He added that he was working closely with Human Resources Director Schawn Johnson to be sure that changes being discussed were fair and realistic across the board for all departments. Commissioner Mary Wetter thought the hybrid and flex working model was important to consider as many private sector jobs had flexible opportunities. She thought that in order to be competitive with the private job market, this change had to be considered. Kaczmarek wanted to help mitigate in-person working issues and thought that the parking lot for employees could be reconfigured because he thought that the public did not use as many spaces as were allotted to public parking. He asked if Mattice knew if the Information Technology (IT) Department had been able to configure the correct security protocols to enable employees to work from home. Kaczmarek wanted the flex working option to be considered because of the congestion at the traffic light at the beginning and end of the day. He thought that staggering in-person working hours would have a positive effect on this issue. Kaczmarek wanted to follow up on a request from the October 2021 Quarterly Leadership Team Meeting in regard to department heads reporting staff accountability and how each department accounted for this. He thought that the in-person employee accountability needed to be ironed out before working from home could be considered. Mattice confirmed that IT Director Matthew Fomby confirmed that the security protocol for employees working from home was ready for use. RECOMMENDATION: To allow staff to pursue potential changes to policy regarding hybrid and flex-work schedules, county building hours of operation, and expansion of designated employee parking. Staff should plan to have discussions regarding updates and changes to this policy at the monthly Personnel and Employee-Relations Committee meetings. To have staff follow up on collecting a information in regard to how staff accountability is handled in each department. V. Board Meeting Schedule & Agenda Process and Timeline – Kaczmarek Kaczmarek had previously asked Kelly to look into gathering information from other counties in regard to their frequency of board meetings as well as how their county board meetings were run. Kelly had provided this information to the board via email. Kaczmarek’s first question was whether the county board workshop meeting details and agenda should be posted in the same location on the website as the regular county board meetings. Kelly clarified that there were two locations on the website that agendas could be found. The workshop details and agendas were always posted on the website calendar, but not in the secondary location where the longer agenda list was located. He explained that this was simply what had been done in the past. The remaining members of the board agreed that the agenda and meeting details should also be available on the agenda list section of the website in addition to the calendar location. Kaczmarek’s second topic of discussion was the adjustment to the timeline for when agendas are to be posted. He explained that it was difficult to familiarize himself with the agenda, especially on a holiday weekend, when the agenda was posted at 12 p.m. on Friday. He proposed that the agenda be posted by 12 p.m. on Thursday for holiday weekends, potentially setting the precedent going forward for all county board agendas. Daleiden thought that it was past practice to have the agenda posted by 12 p.m. on Thursday for a holiday weekend. Kelly confirmed that this was the correct timeline in past practices for holiday weekends. Vetsch pointed out that with the addition of new staff members to take on administrative roles this should give the department more bandwidth to accommodate this proposed timeline. Kaczmarek reiterated that he would like to see the agenda posting deadline be move indefinitely to 12 p.m. on Thursday and pointed out that this should not be an issue with additional staff that had been hired for this role. Daleiden noticed that the counties that only had two county board meetings per month only had meetings that lasted an hour and a half at most. He wondered how their meetings were shorter in length than Wright County’s meetings when meeting half as frequently. Vetsch thought that the advisory updates were not done during these county board meetings as well as counties having a different decision-making delegation processes. Kaczmarek thought this discussion of meeting twice a month went hand in hand with moving the agenda timeline up by 24 hours. This change would allow the commissioners to have committee meetings on the off-week and give staff more time to compile an agenda for the following week. He wanted to know if there was interest among board members to look into this change starting January 2023. He asked Assistant County Attorney Greg Kryzer if this was a change the board would be able to make on its own. Kryzer said the board would just need to continue to announce its regular meeting times and pass a resolution to change the frequency of the meetings in order to stay aligned with Minnesota Statutes. Kaczmarek asked if the members of the board had any concerns with his recommendation to reduce the number of board meetings per month to two and have committee meetings on the alternating Tuesdays. Husom said she would still like some flexibility to schedule meetings as they come up on different days. Husom thought it would be difficult to reduce the frequency down to two meetings per month considering the length of each meeting and the frequency with which the board was currently meeting. She proposed that this should be a discussion to have with the new county commissioners once they were elected. She pointed out that staff might be more likely to miss timelines with less frequent

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 14 of 18 meeting dates. Kaczmarek thought that staff creating the agenda should be firmer with other county staff when receiving agenda submissions after the designated deadline. Husom explained that her concern was with grant deadlines and other deadlines in the outside community that may be missed due to lack of opportunity to have commissioners approve requests. Vetsch thought this was the way the county needed to go but understood that this change from four to two meetings per month would take time for the employees to adjust to the new timeline. Vetsch thought the changes to having two meetings per month and the shortened agenda posting timeline could go hand-in-hand. Husom thought the committee minutes could be summarized, or potentially not discussed at all, during the county board meeting in order to increase the efficiency. Kelly agreed. Wetter asked how many of the counties that Kelly referenced as examples were seven member boards. Kelly explained his reasoning behind selecting the counties he did. It was because these counties were comparable to Wright County in size. He added that only two of the counties he had referenced were seven member boards. Kelly reiterated Kryzer’s statement that the Minnesota Statute allowed for the commissioners to adjust the frequency of meetings. He thought that process modifications could be made, but there would have to be adjustments on the staff side to make the board’s requests happen. Kaczmarek offered the possibility that the minute taker stay late on Wednesday, in order to adjust to the new deadline of 12 p.m. Thursday for agenda posting, being compensated in a flex-work style and have the ability to leave early on Fridays. Kaczmarek thought this was an opportunity for the board to see the positive result of providing additional staffing by increasing efficiency. Daleiden argued that it had not been that long since those positions were filled. Daleiden thought it would be reasonable to start by asking that the agenda was posted Thursday evening or Friday morning. He thought it would be fair to allow Administration staff to see if this request would be feasible, consider moving up the agenda posting deadline, and utilizing a flex-work schedule. Kaczmarek recommended the board set the new deadline as 12 p.m. on Thursday. Daleiden and Husom said they wanted to leave the decision up to staff to review and come up with a solution to present to the board. Wetter suggested trying the 12 p.m. Thursday deadline for a trial period so it would not overwhelm staff and potentially cause staffing turnover to happen. Daleiden reiterated his recommendation that staff take a look at procedures to see if it was possible to move the agenda posting deadline up. Kelly restated the board’s recommendation that it would ideally like to see the agenda posting deadline moved to 12 p.m. Thursdays. Vetsch thought the layout and practices of the county board meetings could be made more efficient as well. Daleiden said when he first became a commissioner, he had to come into the Government Center on Fridays to pick up his agenda packet and that committee minutes were read out loud at each county board meeting. He wanted to emphasize the strides the board had already taken to streamline meeting efficiency. Vetsch thought there was still room for cleaning up the board meeting processes and shorten the meetings’ length. Kelly agreed with Vetsch when he said he wanted to maximize the value the board was getting from its time. He thought it would be good to hear from Administration Office Manager Laine Stephan to get her take on the changes proposed as well as discuss the potential to shorten committee minutes. Vetsch thought that the committee minutes’ recommendations should be moved to the consent agenda on the county board agenda if it was non-controversial. He added that if a recommendation needed to be discussed in more detail, it be moved to a timed agenda item. Husom thought it would be most efficient to move the committee recommendations to a timed agenda item going forward. She also wanted the board to consider moving committee meetings from Wednesdays if the agenda posting timeline were to be moved up to Thursday. Vetsch suggested piloting the new agenda timeline in July 2022, the new committee minute practices in September 2022 and reevaluating the changes in October 2022. Kaczmarek agreed with Vetsch’s recommendation with the adjustment of moving the agenda posting deadline up to 2 p.m. Thursdays prior to July in order to account for the Fourth of July holiday weekend. Vetsch agreed with Kaczmarek’s change. Husom thought this was a reasonable request, especially considering the addition of new staff in Administration and the coming holiday weekend. Kaczmarek confirmed that the official recommendation was to pilot the new agenda posting deadline of 12 p.m. on Thursdays starting Thursday, June 30, pilot a new committee minute practice moving the committee recommendations to timed agenda items starting in September 2022, and reevaluating the instituted changes in October 2022. Vetsch thought that if the number of county board meetings was reduced to two a month, the board should also make a change to only address the recommendations from committee minutes instead of summarizing the meeting itself. Kaczmarek also requested that staff reach out to other counties that had made the transition to two meetings a month in order to glean information about best practices and how to make this transition. RECOMMENDATION: To post County Board Workshop meeting details and agendas on both the website calendar and the website Agenda and Minutes list location. To look into reducing the frequency of County Board meetings to meet twice a month and moving committee meetings to alternating Tuesdays. To have staff reach out to counties that had made the switch to two County Board meetings per month in order to assist Wright County make a smooth transition. To move committee meeting minutes to a timed agenda item in September, to allow for discussion regarding recommendations if deemed necessary. To post County Board Agendas by 12 p.m. Thursdays for holiday weekends. To start posting County Board Agendas by 4:30 p.m. Thursdays starting June 23. To have a reevaluation of the instituted changes at the County Board Workshop in September. VI. Central MN Council on Aging/Health and Human Services (HHS) Senior Services (10:00 a.m.) Social Services Manager Jill Pooler introduced Central Minnesota Council on Aging (CMCOA) Executive Director Lori Vrolson. Pooler said since the county had been providing funds to the CMCOA, Vrolson wanted to be available to give an update on where the

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 15 of 18 funding was being used. Vrolson said that one of the main roles of the CMCOA was to allocate funds coming from the federal Older Americans Act (OAA) at the local level. In a typical year, that was around $2.5 million. Vrolson said the additional COVID-19 Pandemic funding, CMCOA had allocated around $5 million each year for the past two years. However, CMCOA would be going back to the base level of flat funding in the next few years. She was requesting an administrative match from the county, which the county had been providing for the previous 35 years. In Wright County, the request was always $6,587. Vrolson said that in Wright County the main providers were Catholic Charities for meal delivery, Mid-Minnesota Senior Law for the Senior Law Project, Wright County Community Action (WCCA), and Senior Community Services. Vrolson shared that based on 2021 data, the number of individuals served in Wright County through OAA funding from the CMCOA included 4,452 sessions provided by Senior LinkAge Line, 1,073 rides were given, 1,601.25 hours of chores and 1,259.25 hours of homemaking were provided, 1,647 congregate meals were served, 43,237 home delivered meals were provided, 545 hours of caregiver consultation was given, 91 hours of respite provided, 481 hours of legal assistance, and 3,461 calls were answered. Vrolson said that while there was a 36 percent increase since 2019 in delivered meals provided, it is still less than what was seen in other Minnesota counties. She thought this was in part due to funding from the state and WCCA, which had a large supply of frozen meals. Vetsch asked if Catholic Charities not being a long-term provider of meal services would be a detriment to the county down the line. Once a quarter, Vrolson said she would host a meeting to discuss where WCCA was at in regard to meal delivery needs and Catholic Charities would supplement as needed. Catholic Charities worked with WCCA to send out letters in December 2021 to let the community know to contact Catholic Charities for meal service going forward as WCCA was stopping this service. Catholic Charities has congregate sites in Maple Lake, Annandale, and Cokato, in addition to its meal delivery service throughout the county. Vrolson asked that the board let her know where the meals were most needed within the county in order to set up a site where individuals could come once a month for frozen meal pick up. Vrolson said that CMCOA had a contract with a Parkview Care Center for their Director of Nursing to do outreach on the COVID-19 vaccine and the Influenza vaccine. Catholic Charities would be doing a Request for Proposal (RFP) with additional American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to supply providers with community funding to assist in developing community health care workers. Those health care workers will then be able to serve the underserved members of the community. Vetsch asked what her plan was for marketing the services to the community and wanted to know what she was doing to assist in navigating people to these services. Vrolson said the Senior LinkAge Program would get seniors connected to providers. If an individual went to CMCOA, it had staff able to assist the senior or family member navigate the many resources. She said that the outreach that was done was given through the providers that CMCOA promotes, CMCOA did not have a marketing budget specifically. Pooler explained that CMCOA is the funnel for funding sources rather than a navigation tool. She added that this was what Senior LinkAge Line was used for. Vetsch was concerned that the Senior LinkAge Line was too large to easily navigate. He wanted to have a better source of knowledge for county seniors, and he thought the county funds could be better utilized in another way. Pooler said the funding was well utilized but agreed that there could be a better system of pushing out the information. Vrolson said that via Senior LinkAge Line, the CMCOA has social workers available to answer questions and direct individuals to services. Senior LinkAge Line also has staff that would go out and meet with seniors who needed that extra attention. Vrolson said Senior LinkAge Line also has advocates to help answer questions specifically about Medicare. Wetter said that at the last CMCOA meeting, the state demographer was present to explain how the population of seniors was going up and how there would be more of a need financially in the future. Wetter wanted to know what the CMCOA was doing to prepare for this uptick in need in the community. Vrolson noted that there were currently more seniors than school-aged children. The CMCOA’s goal was to make sure there was an array of services available at the community level for adults who stay in their own homes and adults who are aging. She said CMCOA had flat funding for the past 15 years and did not see any increases coming up in the future from OAA funding. The CMCOA knows that it does not have the capacity to service all seniors over age 60, but its goal was to service individuals who are just above the poverty line. Vrolson wanted to extend an invitation to a virtual session with ARP’s national expert on broadband that would be streamed from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. Wednesday, August 24 to discuss the broadband needs of seniors. Vetsch thanked Vrolson for her time and the work she had done within the county. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTES (06/14/2022) Daleiden moved to approve the Committee of the Whole minutes from Tuesday, June 14 as informational only. The motion was seconded by Vetsch. The motion carried 5-0. I. Discussion with BKV Regarding Government Center Extra Services

Commissioner Christine Husom called the meeting to order at 11:13 a.m. County Administrator Lee Kelly said the subject of the meeting was first brought up in a letter from Bruce Schwartzman, Partner and Architect at the Boarman Kroos Vogel Group, Inc (BKV) regarding a request for payment of additional services for Construction Administration (CA) of the Government Center. Kelly said he had forwarded an email to the Board prior to the meeting with information

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 16 of 18 from Schwartzman on additional hours tracking he had put together.

Schwartzman said if the timeline of the project had gone two months or six months past the contract time, he would not be making this request. Schwartzman said the company did not believe in nickel and diming its clients. The work being discussed had a large financial impact on BKV. Schwartzman wanted to go back to the contract to justify the request for additional payment. He referenced the contract between Wright County and BKV, Page 11, §4.3.3, where the project was specified as taking a period of 76 weeks or 18 months. The project went well past the time frame for various reasons. In a letter dated December 20, 2021, Schwartzman referenced a number of ways to calculate the additional cost. Schwartzman said one way would be to take the hours planned for the time period under contract and figuring the percentage BKV went over in hours determine the cost incurred by going over. Schwartzman said the cost of the overage would total a few hundred thousand dollars which he did not think equated the effort BKV had put forth. The second way to calculate the cost, Schwarzman said, was to look at the weekly hours involved. Typically, BKV would go through 12 to 16 hours per week for all the coordination efforts the project required. These additional CA meetings occurred when the project was extended from 18 months to 30 months for various reasons. The cost of this additional CA came out to $109,000 using a blended rate of about $155 per hour. Schwartzman said BKV wanted to be fair about the cost and came up with $85,000 dollars. Schwartzman said because the construction took place in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic with both the pandemic and the resulting supply chain issues, the contractors and construction managers faced unforeseen delays. Schwartzman said this request was a result of those delays and BKV believed the contract allowed for that change. Schwartzman said a question had come up regarding the amount of time BKV had been spending on site. Schwartzman had BKV’s accounting group look at the hours being worked by the two primary BKV construction managers who were helping with the majority of the CA from the architectural side. For the duration of the project, one individual had 3,959.25 hours worked and the other had 2,860.25 hours. Combined the hours came out to about 6,800 hours of CA coordination during the project. The dollar amount came from dividing the number of hours by 30 months and then dividing by four weeks. This number came out to 56 hours on average per week BKV spent on the project, not the 14 hours BKV requested. Schwartzman said he was not looking to retrieve all expenses from this additional work, but a fair adjustment based on the time extension. Schwartzman said the contract was very specific on the timeline. Commissioner Darek Vetsch asked Schwartzman what work had changed in the scope of the project. Vetsch acknowledged that there were pauses in construction from COVID and supply issues. Vetsch believed the construction cost was a flat rate. Schwartzman said that every two weeks or so there were CA meetings and occasionally coordination meetings. No matter what would be going on at the time there were a litany of things that were coordinated during construction that needed to be addressed from paint color to carpeting. There were thousands of items that needed to be addressed. Assistant County Attorney Greg Kryzer asked how many site visits were done by BKV. Schwartzman said theoretically every two weeks, but with COVID some things were done remotely. Vetsch asked if there was a record that could be produced to determine the number of visits. Schwartzman acknowledged there was a log and it could easily be produced to answer this question. Commissioner Mike Kaczmarek asked if both mileage and drive time to the worksite were being billed. Schwartzman said per the contract the company did bill for mileage but not for time spent traveling. He said it was approximately $40 per one-way trip for gas. Vetsch confirmed with Husom the amount being requested was $85,000. Vetsch said that with the millions of dollars the county had spent with BKV he did not think the total due was $85,000, rather a much smaller amount. Schwartzman said he did not want to have a bad relationship with Wright County. He added that his team did an excellent job and he was proud of them. He said he thought this request was fair and appropriate. Husom asked for clarification on what the extra amount without the discount would have been. Schwartzman said the contract has the fees broken down by percentage of phase. On Page 17 §11.5, 20 percent of the fee was CA. Based on that percentage there was a 67 percent increase of scheduled calendar time for the additional 12 months. According to his calculations one way to calculate that is the fee was $337,000 for that phase. He said the fee could have been $224,779, however he said he was not asking for that.

Kryzer asked who had drafted the contract. Schwartzman said his firm created the contract. Kryzer asked if it was BKV’s firm that put all the strike throughs and additions in. Schwartzman said yes. Kryzer added that this was a copyrighted document, and the county did not have a license to produce such a document. Kryzer asked if there were any contract negotiations between Wright County and BKV. Schwartzman said there should have been. Kryzer asked if the contract was accepted as it had been presented. Schwartzman said he did not know but was certain there had been some discussion. He said that he could not recall a client who had not had some back and forth on the contract. Kryzer said

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 17 of 18 the contract was signed by former Assistant Wright County Attorney Brian Asleson. Kryzer asked Schwartzman what the back and forth was like between Asleson and himself. Schwartzman said he could do research to find out, but he did not recall the specifics. Kaczmarek asked if Kryzer had reviewed the contract and Kryzer said he had asked County Attorney Sarah Erickson, who had experience with this specific American Institute of Architects (AIA) type of contract, to review it. Erickson stated she was familiar with the request for additional services to be paid and noted these requests were not uncommon with these types of contracts. Erickson identified two separate issues. The first issue was in the Additional Services section of the AIA contract signed by BKV and Wright County, Page 11, §4.3.3. This section specified caps to the number of shop drawings, site visits, product data, work inspections, and final inspections covered in the contract. Erickson said if BKV was to do any additional work beyond the stated caps, those overages must be paid by the client. Erickson identified the second issue being the additional CA time due to the extension of the project. She said this issue was addressed on Page 11, §4.3.4 and was intentionally stricken from the contract. Erickson said Wright County does not owe any money for CA. Erickson said the contract which was written and signed by BKV did not allow for additional services to be paid out if completion was not within the specified amount of time. Erickson said that the writers of the contract had not put in a number into §4.3.4 indicating how much time past the planned completion before additional services were compensated for. Erickson said if they had put “18 months” in the section where, indicated by parenthesis, had not been stricken then the additional expenses would have be owed to BKV. She said that BKV did not have a contract provision to turn to for the additional services caused by the extensions. Erickson said the county does owe BKV for any additional site visits as indicated in §4.3.3 in the contract as they had occurred.

Kaczmarek asked Schwartzman if he had a response to this. Schwartzman said he deferred to the board he had brought forward what he thought was fair compensation. Husom and Commissioner Mark Daleiden asked how many site visits were additional and what the cost per visit was. Schwartzman indicated each visit was approximately two to four hours in length, but he would need to refer to his records for the specifics. Daleiden presented the option that the county pay $50,000 for the additional work as it had been done by BKV. Vetsch said he was more inclined to pay only what was extra according to the signed contract. Vetsch said he believed the total amount due was significantly less than $50,000. He said that he had looked at the additional work done and did not believe it cost as much as was being stated by BKV, but rather around $6,000 to $10,000. Daleiden repeated his suggestion of $50,000 to acknowledge the additional work done. Schwartzman said that at this point that the money had been spent by BKV and it had already covered the costs. He said he thought the charges were fair and appropriate but deferred to the board again. Schwartzman said this issue should have been brought up and resolved more than a year ago when the letter was presented, and the additional work was happening. Daleiden said BKV did provide extra time and he thought it fair to pay at least $50,000. Vetsch wanted it articulated whether BKV had made any profits on this work. He did not believe that BKV took a loss as an organization. Daleiden stated that regardless of profits, BKV did spend extra time on site. Schwartzman offered to sit down with Vetsch and open up the project’s financial books showing all the costs and charges. Kaczmarek said the county was not trying to hide anything with the contract and he was disappointed that Schwartzman had not come to the board with a number indicating how many site visits over 36 the county owed. Schwartzman said he thought the language in the contract was just and fair. He said he valued the relationship with Wright County more than collecting the requested funds. Husom said the bids had come in under projection and if the building was to be built that day, the cost would have been significantly more expensive. Husom agreed with Daleiden that $50,000 would be appropriate. Daleiden asked Facilities Services Director Alan Wilczek if he had any idea how many meetings over the designated 36 there were. Wilczek said in order to know this, he would have to go back to the minutes of the construction meetings. Wilczek said one of the two individuals Schwartzman mentioned as construction managers were on site most of the time, but that there were a handful of meetings where no representative from BKV was available. Wilczek said ground was broken in September, 2019 and completed in February, 2022. Construction took 29 months to 30 months instead of the original estimate of 24 months. Wilczek said the changes to the project were what extended the time. He said the contract originally ranged from 130,000 square feet to 165,000 square feet before changing to 202,000 square feet when the project was released for bid. In addition, he said the site and the duration changed from the original 24 months to a timeframe of 29 months to 30 months. This extension was partly because of the expansion of the third floor and reconfiguration of floor zero and an additional 20,000 square feet, which the county paid additional services for. Vetsch agreed with Kaczmarek that, while the county should pay what it was contractually obliged to pay, nothing more should have been paid. Daleiden asked if the contract was amended or increased at all with the size changes. Schwartzman said there were additional services added to the contract. Schwartzman asked that his request be dropped. While Schwartzman acknowledged the amount he had requested was not a small amount, it was more important that the project went well and BKV would absorb the amount disputed.

06-21-2022 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES Page 18 of 18 Kryzer thought a recommendation for information only was in order and the matter at hand could be closed out. RECOMMENDATION: Information only. ADVISORY COMMITTEE / ADVISORY BOARD UPDATES County Administrator Lee Kelly Kelly said the board was fortunate enough to host the AMC District 5 meeting on Monday, June 6. The timing worked out great as the commissioners had attended the Wright Soil and Water Conservation District Annual Tour which was nice to see some of those sites and projects the county has been working on for a while. He also mentioned that at 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 29, the county is hosting an open house for employees for Well at Work Clinics ribbon cutting. Commissioner Michael Kaczmarek Kaczmarek had an Emergency Services Board (ESB) meeting. There was an audit conducted and the books were good. Kaczmarek said the ESB would lowering regional operating boards expenses next year by using some of the fund balance. The Wright County Fair Board met and advised Kaczmarek that the mud racing event has been cancelled because there was a lack of entries. He said he had a few copies of a limited edition fair book available if anyone wanted one. Commissioner Mark Daleiden Daleiden said the Wellness Group met Tuesday, June 14, and wanted to remind everyone that the Spring Wellness walk would be on Wednesday, June 22, and asked employees to complete the survey about what you would like to see for a possible café or vending options. Daleiden would like pop bottle recycling containers in our facility. All five board members attended the Wright County Mayors Association meeting and had a great time. Commissioner Darek Vetsch Vetsch attended the Wright County Economic Development Partnership meeting. One of the presenters was Nick Tietz from ILT Studios, which is a startup studio for entrepreneurship training. It has a 10-week Academy that trains local innovators and entrepreneurs the skillsets needed to develop successful ventures. Tietz said ILT Studios were looking for potential entrepreneurs in our area that a scholarship could be given to. Vetsch had three different meetings with the Energy Transitioning Group about trying to create a matrix that illustrated taxes that our power plants paid to personal property tax, to production tax, and state accessed tax. Commissioner Mary Wetter Wetter wanted to commend the Sheriff’s Office for a wonderful open house on Friday, June 10. She thought the robotics were very impressive. Wetter said she met the new Horticulture Specialist Emily Hanson who lives in Buffalo. Wetter said she met with the City of Rockford where she participated in the Environmental Health Group. She hoped this group would continue. She also met with the Historical Society to discuss replacements for Archivist Betty Dircks who will be retiring in August. Wetter also mentioned that she had a great time at the Mayors Association meeting. Commissioner Christine Husom: Husom thought the Economic Development Authority (EDA) workshop brought up great discussion with the different townships. The Mentorship, Education, and Drug Awareness (MEADA) Coalition met and were thinking of doing site visits. Husom also had a booth at the Sheriffs open house which was very busy. She said Public Works, Labor Management, and the Highway Department would be at the fair and are very busy with signs and culverts. State Community Health and Central Minnesota Jobs in Training brought up that the state legislature did not finish its session so many groups are in a holding pattern not knowing what funding will be going through. The meeting adjourned at 10:11 a.m. County Board Minutes submitted by Delia Scepaniak, Administrative Specialist.

REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION

Board Meeting Date: Consent Agenda

Requester’s Name: Timed

Time Required: Title:

Department: Item for Consideration

Board Action Requested:

Select which Value Stream the request primarily aligns with:

Briefly describe how the request aligns with the selected value stream.

Describe the impact on staffing resources.

Describe the impact on financial resources.

Background/Justification:

Has the request been reviewed by the Attorney’s Office?

Risk Management?

Number of original documents requiring signature

An Equal Opportunity Employer

Administration Department

Clay Wilfahrt Asst. County Administrator 3650 Braddock Ave NE Suite 3200 Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph: (763) 682-7362 Fax: (763) 682-6178 Clay.wilfahrt @co.wright.mn.us www.co.wright.mn.us

May 31, 2022

Bob Hiivala Wright County Auditor/Treasurer 3650 Braddock Ave NE Buffalo, MN 55313

Mr. Hiivala,

The County Board has expressed interest in learning more about the operations of the Wright County Fair Board. To that end, the Board requests that you complete the following duties and research pertaining to the Fair Board:

• Document current cash controls and processes. • Make recommendations for improvement on controls and processes. • Audit ticketing and parking sales revenues. • Document off-season revenues and fee schedules related to such activity. • Document current fund balance of organization.

• Map cash flow needs • Check investment utilization and performance

• Highlight activities that lost revenue in 2022. • Identify any taxing liability to the organization • Review Payroll records (Identify criteria for each of these codes)

• 6150 Fair Board • 6170 Fair Workers • 6172 General Hourly Labor

• Document process of collecting certificates of insurance

The County Board has requested that this work be completed by September 9, 2022 at which time a report on your finding will be presented to the County Board. Please contact me with any questions you may have about this assignment.

Sincerely,

Clay Wilfahrt Assistant County Administrator













Risk Management?














Risk Management?


LMM8602

Sticky Note













Risk Management?














Risk Management?


06/28/2022

Tim Dahl

Risk Manager

Authorization for signatures on an agreement between the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and Wright County. The agreement will allow the DNR use the space under the hangar building located at 505 County Road 37 NE Buffalo, MN (Wright County Compost and Recycling Center)

Wright County and the DNR provide Public Safety Services to the citizens of the County and visitors. Allowing the DNR to store equipment in Wright County allows for equipment to be easily accessible for emergencies and routine work.

Minimal

This is a non-monetary agreement

Wright County and the DNR have been operating on a verbal arrangement for the storage of DNR equipment. In the interest of managing Risk and to continue the arrangement Wright County has requested to have a written agreement including an inventory of DNR assets to be stored on County property. The attached agreement defines the arrangement including the list of stored assets.

2

Administration

✔

Yes

Yes

Promote Safe and Healthy Communities

STATE OF MINNESOTA

LICENSE

LICENSE NO. L-489

THIS LICENSE is made by and between the County of Wright, hereinafter referred to as LICENSOR, and the State of Minnesota, Department of Administration, hereinafter referred to as LICENSEE, acting for the benefit of the Department of Natural Resources; Region 3.

WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Administration is empowered by Minn. Stat. §16B.24, subd. 6, to lease non-state owned property;

WHEREAS, LICENSOR owns, maintains and operates the Wright County Compost & Recycling Facility ((hereinafter referred to as “Facility”) located at 505 County Rd 37 NE, Buffalo, Minnesota 55313 and has a space for equipment storage under the hangar which is available for LICENSEE'S use;

WHEREAS, LICENSEE has expressed a need to use the space under the hangar in the Facility for purposes herein described;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained, which each of the parties hereto acknowledge as adequate and sufficient, it is hereby agreed as follows.

1. PREMISES LICENSOR grants and LICENSEE accepts the non-exclusive use of:

approximately 7,300 usable square feet of space, as shown on the attached Exhibit A, hereinafter referred to as the “Premises”, in the Facility located at 505 County Road 37 NE in the City of Buffalo, County of Wright, Minnesota 55313.

2. PERIOD OF USE The term of this License is five (5) years and twenty one (21) days,commencing July 11, 2022 and continuing through July 31, 2027 (“Period of Use”).

3. USE

3.1 LICENSEE shall use the Premises as equipment storage and for no other purpose.

3.2 LICENSEE’s equipment that will be stored in the Premises are listed in Exhibit B andwill be placed in the Premises at a mutually agreed upon location by LICENSOR and LICENSEE.

3.3 LICENSEE agrees to move the equipment to another part of the Premises or to another location within the Facility if requested by LICENSOR at least forty eight (48) hours in advance by sending a written notice to LICENSEE. If LICENSEE requires additional

DNR License 489 Page 2 of 7

time to move the equipment, LICENSEE shall notify LICENSOR within forty eight (48) hours of receipt of written notice from LICENSOR and LICENSOR shall coordinate with LICENSEE to move the equipment in a reasonable and timely manner.

4. EQUIPMENT AND PREMISES/FACILITY ACCESS LICENSEE’s access to the Premises,

the Facility and to LICENSEE’s equipment shall be permitted during the Facility’s normal public hours from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Tuesdays and Thursdays and from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 Noon, every 2nd and 3rd Saturdays of the month. Should the Facility’s normal public hours change during the Period of Use, LICENSOR shall inform LICENSEE at least forty eight (48) hours in advance by sending a written notice to LICENSEE.

5. LICENSE NOT A LEASE It is expressly understood and agreed that by reason of the nature and character of the occupancy of all parts thereof, the relation of LICENSOR and LICENSEE, as contemplated by the laws of the State of Minnesota, is not created by the Agreement, but LICENSEE is granted only a permit to occupy the space described, and for the specified period. LICENSEE shall at all times be considered an independent contractor, and not an employee or agent of the LICENSOR.

6. LICENSE FEE LICENSEE and LICENSOR hereby agree there is no fee for LICENSEE’S

use of the Premises.

7. TERMINATION

7.1 In the event that the Minnesota State Legislature does not appropriate to the Department of Natural Resources funds necessary for the continuation of this License, or in the event that Federal Funds necessary for the continuation of this License are withheld for any reason, this License may be terminated by LICENSEE upon giving thirty (30) days written notice.

7.2 Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §16B.24, subd. 6, this License is subject to cancellation upon

thirty (30) days written notice by LICENSEE for any reason except the license of other non-state-owned land or premises for the same use.

7.3 Notwithstanding Clauses 7.1 and 7.2 above, this License may be terminated by either

party for any reason at any time upon giving thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party.

8. SURRENDER OF PREMISES LICENSOR and LICENSEE hereby agree that at the

expiration or earlier termination of this License or extension thereof, any equipment (hereinafter referred to as “Personal Property”), brought to the Premises by LICENSEE shall remain the property of LICENSEE. LICENSEE shall remove its Personal Property and vacate and surrender possession of the Premises to LICENSOR in as good condition as when LICENSEE took possession, ordinary wear and tear and damage by the elements excepted.

9. DUTIES OF LICENSOR LICENSOR shall, at its expense, provide the following:


9.1 Management LICENSOR agrees that in exercising its management

responsibilities of the property of which the Premises are a part, including the maintenance, repair, alterations and construction relating thereto, it shall comply with all applicable laws, statutes, rules, ordinances and regulations, including but not limited to building code, disabilities access, zoning, air quality, pollution control, recyclable materials and prevailing wage requirements, as issued by any federal, state or local political subdivisions having jurisdiction and authority in connection with said property.

9.2 Common Areas LICENSOR shall provide sufficient light and maintenance to the common areas and public access areas to the Premises and Facility so that such areas shall be safe and reasonably comfortable.

9.3 Maintenance LICENSOR shall maintain in working condition all appurtenances

within the scope of this License. 9.4 Repairs LICENSOR shall make such necessary repairs so as to continue to

provide all such service appurtenances as are required by this License, including any improvements to the Premises, whether or not the improvement was paid for by LICENSEE. However, that LICENSOR shall not be responsible for repairs upon implements or articles, which are the personal property of LICENSEE, nor shall LICENSOR bear the expense of repairs to Premises necessitated by damage caused by LICENSEE beyond normal wear and tear.

9.5 Delivery of Premises LICENSOR covenants that it will deliver the Premises to

LICENSEE in a clean and sanitary condition with all services and appurtenances included within the scope of this License in effect and in good running order.

9.6 Quiet Enjoyment LICENSEE shall have the quiet enjoyment of the Premises

during the full term of this License and any extension or renewal thereof. 9.7 Taxes and Assessments LICENSOR shall be responsible for payment of all

taxes and assessments upon the Premises and the Facility. 9.8 Exterior Lighting LICENSOR shall provide adequate exterior lighting in the

parking lots, Facility entrance/exits and loading dock areas.

10. DUTIES OF LICENSEE 10.1 LICENSEE shall allow access to Premises by LICENSOR or its authorized

representatives at any reasonable time during the Period of Use and any renewal(s) thereof, for any purpose within the scope of this License.

10.2 LICENSEE shall not use the Premises at any time for any purpose forbidden by law.


10.3 LICENSEE shall not assign, sublet, or otherwise transfer its interest in this

License without the prior written consent of LICENSOR.

10.4 LICENSEE shall make no alterations, additions or changes in the Premises without the advance written consent of LICENSOR. All alterations, additions, improvements and fixtures, which may be made or installed by LICENSOR upon the Premises and which in any manner are attached to the floors, walls or ceilings, at the termination of this License shall remain the property of LICENSOR, and shall remain upon and be surrendered with the Premises as a part thereof, without damage or injury beyond normal wear and tear and floor covering affixed to the floor shall likewise become the property of LICENSOR.

10.5 LICENSEE agrees to observe reasonable precautions to prevent waste of

electricity, water, or any other utility or any service, whether such is furnished by LICENSOR or obtained and paid for by LICENSEE.

10.6 LICENSEE shall not keep or have on or around the Premises and the Facility any

item of a dangerous, flammable, or explosive nature that might unreasonably increase the risk of fire or explosion on or around the Premises and the Facility or that might be considered hazardous by a responsible insurance company.

11. INSURANCE

11.1 Property Damage It shall be the duty of LICENSOR and LICENSEE to maintain insurance or self-insurance on their own property, both real and personal. Notwithstanding anything apparently to the contrary in this License, LICENSOR and LICENSEE hereby release one another and their respective partners, officers, employees and property manager from any and all liability or responsibility to the other or anyone claiming through or under them by way of subrogation or otherwise for loss or damage covered by said insurance, even if such loss or damage shall have been caused by the fault or negligence of the other party, or anyone for whom such party may be responsible.

11.2 Liability LICENSOR and LICENSEE agree that each party will be responsible for its

own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of any others and the results thereof. LICENSEE'S liability shall be governed by the provisions of the Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. §3.736, and other applicable law.

12. AUDIT Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §16C.05, subd. 5, the books, records, documents and

accounting procedures and practices of LICENSOR relevant to this License shall be subject to examination by the State and/or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six (6) years.


13. DEFAULT BY LICENSOR If LICENSOR shall default in the performance of any of the terms or provisions of this License, LICENSEE shall promptly so notify LICENSOR in writing. If LICENSOR shall fail to cure such default within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice, or if the default is of such character as to require more than thirty (30) days to cure, and LICENSOR shall fails to commence to do so within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice and thereafter diligently proceed to cure such default, then in either event, LICENSEE, at its sole option, may terminate this License upon thirty (30) days written notice.

14. SMOKING Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §16B.24, subd. 9, LICENSOR and LICENSEE shall not permit smoking in the Premises. In addition, LICENSOR and LICENSEE shall not permit the use of e-cigarettes, and vaping in the Premises.

15. DESTRUCTION

15.1 If the Premises or Facility shall be destroyed or damaged by fire, tornado, flood, civil disorder or any cause whatsoever, so that the Premises become untenantable, or LICENSEE is unable to conduct its business, LICENSEE shall have the option of terminating this License immediately or allowing LICENSOR such amount of time as LICENSEE deems reasonable to restore the damaged Premises to a tenantable condition.

15.2 LICENSOR and LICENSEE further agree that if LICENSEE is unable to conduct its

business due to the damage or destruction of any adjacent property (Adjacent Property) required to conduct LICENSEE’s business, due to fire, tornado, flood, civil disorder or any cause whatsoever, LICENSEE may relocate to alternative space until said time as LICENSEE is able to conduct its business at the Premises.

16. GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT COMPLIANCE

16.1 LICENSOR must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat., Chapter 13, as it applies to all data provided by LICENSEE in accordance with this License and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by LICENSOR in accordance with this License. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. §13.08, apply to LICENSOR and LICENSEE.

16.2 Minn. Stat., Chapter 13, provides that all government data are public unless otherwise

classified. If LICENSOR receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, LICENSOR must immediately notify LICENSEE and consult with LICENSEE as to how LICENSOR should respond to the request. LICENSOR’S response shall comply with applicable law, including that the response is timely and, if LICENSOR denies access to the data, that LICENSOR’S response references the statutory basis upon which LICENSOR relied. LICENSOR does not have a duty to provide public data to the public if the public data is available from LICENSEE.

17. AMENDMENTS All amendments to this License shall be in writing and executed by a duly

authorized representative of each party.


18. EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS The License may be executed in any number of

counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which counterparts of this License taken together shall constitute but one and the same License. Delivery of an executed counterpart of this License by facsimile or email or a PDF file shall be equally as effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this License.

19. NOTICES

19.1 All notices or communications between LICENSOR and LICENSEE shall be in writing and deemed to have been given upon the occurrence of one of the following methods of delivery to the address noted in Section 19.2 below.

a. when personally delivered to the addressee, or

b. on the second business day after sender has deposited the registered or certified

mailing with the US Postal Service, or

c. one (1) business day after deposited with an overnight courier service.

19.2 Mailing Addresses:

LICENSOR: Wright County Administration Attn: Central Services 3650 Braddock Avenue N.W. Suite #3200 Buffalo, MN 55313

LICENSEE: Real Estate and Construction Services Department of Administration 50 Sherburne Ave # 309 St Paul MN 55155

WITH A COPY TO: Department of Natural Resources Operations Services Attn: Lease Administrator 500 Lafayette Road St Paul, MN 55155

EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A Floor Plan of the Premises Exhibit B List of LICENSEE’s Equipment


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands on the date(s) indicated below intending to be bound thereby.

LICENSOR: COUNTY OF WRIGHT Licensor certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the License on behalf of Licensor as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.

By

Title

Date

By

Title

Date

LICENSEE: STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

By Real Estate and Construction Services

Date

APPROVED BY: STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

By

Title

Date

RECOMMENDED BY: STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

By

Title

Date

STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual signing certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. §16A.15 and §16C.05.

By

Date

SWIFT P.O.

Contract No.

Account Code

Fund No

Exhibit A

The blue area would approximately be Enforcement’s space (30’ x 150’ for 4500 square feet).

The orange area would approximately be PAT’s space (35’ x 80’ for 2800 square feet).

Total Premises – approx. 7,300 square feet.

Exhibit A

Exhibit B

List of Licensee’s Equipment

• John deer 3075M on the tow master trailer.

• John deer 3046R on the felling trailer.

• Riding lawnmower on its trailer.

• Boat and Trailer.

• Spud pole puller on its trailer.

• Chipper

• Groomer

• Tracks for East side tractor

• Tires for East side tractor

• Trail brush• Forks for the JD 3075m

• K334 Station• Pro-drive duck boat • Patrol boat• Older duck boat with tiller• ATV• K317 Station• Patrol boat• Grumman sport boat• Kayak• ATV• Snowmobile • K333 Station• Kayak• One beavertail boat• Patrol boat• RiverPro• Grumman Sportboat• Snowmobile• ATV• A couple seized deer stands• K337 Station• Tunnel drive boat• Patrol boat

Tenant shall notify Landlord in writing for the storage of additional LICENSEE’s equipment that is not listed in this Exhibit B.













Risk Management?


06/28/2022

Greg T. Kryzer

Civil Division Chief

Refer New Position of Assistant Civil Division Chief and County Attorney Office Reorganization and Reclassification to the Personnel Committee

Promotes efficient use of government resources and assists in maintaining a consistent levy by reducing the reliance on external professional services.

It is anticipated the number of full time staff in the County Attorney's Office will not change with this request.

We are not anticipating a budgetary adjustment for 2022 because of this request.

Historically our office did not take this approach and all employment matters were referred to outside counsel which resulted in higher professional service expenses. Since our office has taken on these tasks, we have helped reduce the expense incurred with outside consultants. These tasks over the past year have included attending union/management meetings, attending closed labor negotiation sessions, providing advice on employment matters, and conducting employment workplace investigations. Our office in the past four months alone has completed two employment investigations that normally would have been handled by outside investigators. These investigations likely saved the County $20,000 in professional service expenses. As a result of these added duties our office has realized a need to have a second civil attorney in a supervisory capacity to assist the Administration Department and the County Board with the ongoing employment/labor issues. Our office is requesting to create the supervisory position of Assistant Civil Division Chief. This position would assist with the supervision of the civil division and would provide advice on labor and employment matters. It is anticipated this position would only be posted internally and that an attorney position would remain unfilled. We are also asking the Personnel Committee to review our proposed organizational structure with this new position and to authorize reclassifications as necessary.

Attorney

✔

Yes

N/A

Optimize Civic Engagement













Risk Management?


1

COOPERATIVE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT REGARDING THE INSPECTION OF BLEACHERS ON WRIGHT COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS

This intergovernmental cooperative joint powers agreement regarding the inspection of bleachers at the Wright County Fairground Grandstand (hereinafter, the “Agreement”) is made effective on this 28th day of June, 2022 by and between Wright County (hereinafter, the “County”), a municipal corporation, and the City of Howard Lake (hereinafter, the “City”), a municipal corporation. WHEREAS, the County owns property within the city limits of the City of Howard Lake. WHEREAS, this property has been designated as the Wright County Fairgrounds (hereinafter, “Fairgrounds”). WHEREAS, there are bleachers located at the Fairgrounds Grandstand (hereinafter, “Grandstand Bleachers”), located on Parcel 109800334404. WHEREAS, the City has statutory responsibility for the inspection of bleachers within its city limits pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 326B.112. WHEREAS, the County and City desire that Wright County Planning and Zoning conduct the inspection of the Grandstand Bleachers. WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 471.59 authorizes governmental units to jointly and/or cooperatively exercise their powers. WHEREAS, the Grandstand Bleachers are required to be inspected as outlined in section 326B.112. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority contained in Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 (“Joint Exercise of Powers”) and Minnesota Statutes section 326B.112 and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and the benefits that each party hereto shall derive hereby, the Parties agree as follows:

I. PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT

a. The purpose of this Agreement is to allow Wright County Planning and Zoning to inspect the bleachers to ensure they comply with the requirements of section 326B.112.

II. TERM OF AGREEMENT

a. This Agreement shall be effective from the date indicated above until December 31, 2025

and shall automatically renew every three years unless and until this Agreement is terminated as outlined in Section III.

2

III. TERMINATION

a. A Party may terminate this Agreement upon providing to the other Party not less than forty-five (30) days advance written notice for any or no reason.

b. In the event of a termination by a Party, each Party shall fully discharge all obligations owed to the other Party accruing prior to the date of such termination, and, except as otherwise provided herein, each Party shall be released from all obligations, which would otherwise accrue subsequent to the date of termination.

IV. INSURANCE; LIABILITY; MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITY; NO WAIVER OF

IMMUNITIES

a. Liability: Each Party to this Agreement shall be liable for its own acts to the extent provided by law and hereby agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the other, its officers and employees against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims or actions, including attorney’s fees that the other, its officers and employees may hereafter sustain, incur or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of any act or omission of the Party, its agents, servants, or employees, in the execution, performance or failure to adequately perform its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. The provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466, and other applicable laws govern liability of the parties. It is the intent of each Party that this Agreement does not create any liability or exposure of one party for the acts or omissions of any other Party pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, Subd. 1a(a).

b. Notification of Potential Liability: Each Party agrees to promptly notify the other Party if

it knows or becomes aware of any facts or allegations reasonably giving rise to actual or potential liability, claims, causes of action judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including attorney’s fees, involving or reasonably likely to involve the other Party, and arising out of acts or omissions related to this Agreement.

c. Insurance: Each Party to this Agreement agrees that it is self-insured pursuant to the laws of Minnesota or carries adequate insurance coverage to manage all risk undertaken pursuant to this Agreement

V. ASSIGNMENT

a. No Party will assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the consent of the

other Parties.

VI. AUDIT OF AGREEMENT RECORDS

a. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 16C.05, the Parties’ books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices with respect to any matter covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the State of Minnesota Office of the State Auditor

3

upon written notice, at any time during normal business hours, for the purpose of auditing, examining or making excerpts or transcripts of relevant data.

VII. AMENDMENT OR CHANGES TO AGREEMENT

a. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement

shall be valid only when reduced to writing and duly signed by the Parties hereto; after all appropriate and necessary authority has been acquired by each such Party.

b. Modifications or additional schedules shall not be construed to adversely affect vested rights or causes of action which have accrued prior to the effective date of such amendment, modification, or supplement. The term “Agreement” as used herein shall be deemed to include any future amendments, modifications, and additional schedules made in accordance herewith

VIII. INTERPRETATION OF AGREEMENT

a. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of

Minnesota.

IX. ENTIRE AGREEMENT

a. It is understood and agreed that this entire Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties hereto relating to the subject matters herein. All items that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.

b. The matters set forth in the “WHEREAS” clauses at the beginning of this Agreement are by this reference incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement.

c. The Parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, regulations, and rules currently in force or later enacted including but not limited to the MGDPA, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.425, subd. 4a, and as applicable, non-discrimination and affirmative action laws and policies.

d. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability will not affect any other provision, and this Agreement will be construed and enforced as if such invalid or unenforceable provision had not been included.

e. Failure of a Party to enforce any provision of this Agreement does not affect the rights of

the Parties to enforce such provision in another circumstance. Failure to enforce a provision does not affect the rights of the Parties to enforce any other provision of the Agreement at any time.

4

f. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto are authorized signatories and have executed this Agreement, the day and year first above written. COUNTY OF WRIGHT By: __________________________ Its: Date: _________________________

5

CITY OF HOWARD LAKE By: __________________________ Its: Date: _________________________ Approval Recommended:













Risk Management?


© 2010, Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. University of Minnesota Extension is an equal opportunity educator and employer. This material is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests for consultation on formats to 800-876-8636. Printed on recycled and recyclable paper with at least 10 percent postconsumer waste material. 12/10

© 2017 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. University of Minnesota Extension is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to 612-624-1222.

Printed on recycled and recyclable paper with at least 10 percent postconsumer waste material.

WHEREAS, The Farm Family Recognition Program has existed for over 30 years and honors farm

families from throughout Minnesota for their contributions to the agriculture industry and their

local communities.

WHEREAS, The Lambert family has embodied the ideals of the Farm Family Recognition Program

for many decades. The Lamberts dairied for several years and continue to raise 200 steers and

sow 1,000 acres annually.

WHEREAS, Gene and Mary Jo raised four kids on the same land Gene grew up on. They passed

their passion for agriculture down- with three of the kids active in agriculture today, and two on

the home farm.

WHEREAS, Gene, Mary Jo, and family, are active in their church community, and have participated

in the Wright County Dairy Association, Wright County 4-H, and the Farm Service Agency Board.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, (BLANK), Chairman of the Wright County Board of Commissioners do hereby

proclaim the Gene and Mary Jo Lambert family of Buffalo the recipients of the 2022 Farm Family

of the Year in Wright County, Minnesota. Please join me in congratulating the Lambert family and

recognizing the positive effect they have had on our community.

WRIGHT COUNTY BOARD DECLARATION

Farm Family of the Year – Wright County

© 2022 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. University of Minnesota Extension is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to 612-624-1222.

Printed on recycled and recyclable paper with at least 10 percent postconsumer waste material.













Risk Management?


7550 MERIDIAN CIR N, SUITE 120 | MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 PAGE 1 OF 2

Technical Memorandum

To: Matt Detjen Agriculture and Drainage Coordinator

From: Joe Lewis, PE

Subject: Wright County Ditch 10 Realignment

Engineer’s Findings

Date: June 15, 2022

HEI Project #: 7103-0025

BACKGROUND

Wright County is realigning a portion of County Ditch 10 (CD 10), west of the intersection of CSAH 6

and CSAH 30. The current CD 10 alignment is near CSAH 30 and poses a risk to the stability of the

roadway. The banks of the road bed have started to erode due to the close proximity of the ditch to

the roadway embankment. The County appointed Houston Engineering, Inc. (HEI) to review the

proposed realignment plans by the Wright County Highway Department to confirm it meets the

requirements under M.S. 163.17 and file a report. Specifically, the review focuses on the proposed

cross section, grade, and easements. This memorandum documents the engineer’s findings.

The County Board, acting as the petitioner and the Drainage Authority for this project, has provided

plan and profiles previously developed that show the as constructed or subsequently improved

condition (ACSIC) profile of CD 10. Additionally, plans have also been provided that show the

proposed location and cross section of the realignment.

FINDINGS

The CD 10 Main Trunk in the vicinity of the proposed realignment has a grade of 0.02%, a bottom

width of 14 feet, and side slopes at 1.5:1. The stationing of the channel along the proposed

realignment is between existing stationing 51+00 – 59+00. This realignment will shift the channel 80

feet to be further away from CSAH 30. The provided plans show a 14 foot bottom width, matching

existing, and 2:1 side slopes, which is flatter than the existing section. The realignment section is

shown with a 0.00% grade at elevation 983.3. This should be revised to tie into the ACSIC elevations

at the upstream and downstream end of the realignment. Due to the minor reduction in length,

approximately 40 feet over a 650 foot long segment, the resulting grade for the realignment will be

very similar to the ACSIC grade of 0.02%.

I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or

report was prepared by me or under my direct

supervision and that I am a duly Licensed

Professional Engineer under the laws of the State

of Minnesota.

6/15/2022

Joe Lewis Date

Reg. No. 46215

7550 MERIDIAN CIR N, SUITE 120 | MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 PAGE 2 OF 2

It is not expected that the realignment will result in significant hydraulic changes anywhere along the

CD 10 system. Therefore, the realignment will not adversely impact the drainage function for upstream

benefitting landowners nor will it adversely affect downstream drainage function while protecting the

stability of CSAH 30. The system modification as proposed does not prevent access for inspection

and maintenance of the remaining portions of the public drainage.

PERMITS / NOTICING

The benefitting landowners of the CD 10 system should be notified, with direct coordination for the

landowners of the realignment portion to obtain easements on their property. In addition to obtaining

the necessary easement and right of way, the county may need to obtain approvals from other

agencies, including but not limited to:

• An NPDES Stormwater Permit for Construction from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; and

• A Section 404 permit per the Clean Water Act from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

ATTACHMENTS

Plan/Profile of the realignment

District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5

Christine Husom Darek Vetsch Mark Daleiden Mary Wetter Michael Kaczmarek

COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

JUNE 20, 2022

DATE APPROVED: [ ] Members Present: Christine Husom, Darek Vetsch, Mark Daleiden, Mary Wetter, Michael Kaczmarek

Others Present: Marc Mattice, Clay Wilfahrt, Jami Goodrum, Michelle Miller, Andi Gayner, Phil

Hodges, Elizabeth Karels, Jessica Nelson, Mike MacMillan, Tammi Solarz, Brian Lutes, John Bowen, Lori Pawelk, Sarah Grosshuesch, Greg Kryzer, Joel Torkelson, Gregory Wise, Jill Pooler (Remote): Zachary Robideau, John Holler, Schawn Johnson, Ryan Kotila, Lindsey Meyer, Elizabeth Karels, Keith Bennett, Dalia Scepaniak


I. Discussion Regarding Truancy Social Services Manager Michelle Miller began the meeting by sharing the survey results regarding Truancy and Educational Neglect within the county. The survey was sent to the 10 school districts within Wright County as well as other districts outside of the county. Nine school districts responded with Annandale, Dassel-Cokato, Maple Lake and Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted School Districts being the ones within the county that did not respond. The vast majority of these schools would remove students who had between one to 10 unexcused absences. The School Support Plan within the county would take on students who school districts referred to the county. 66 percent of respondents thought the support plan was too time consuming. 63 percent thought the initial referral was easy to use and 45 percent thought the intervention form was easy to use. For the County Attorney intervention survey question 40 percent of respondants were satisfied with the program itself. Miller found that the districts thought the communication and having a social worker were both good pieces of the process. She heard from the community that it liked the support it received and the process with court intervention referral and family meetings. She said the difficult part was to find out where they succeeded the best in the survey because not all respondents answered all the questions. She said that when looking at the percentage, court intervention ranked the highest in regard to improvements in attendance due to intervention. The moderate amount of improvement attendance was direct County Attorney referral, initial referral and intervention referral being at around 30 percent improvement in schools’ opinions. Intervention and Student Attendance Review Board (SARB) referrals were intervention methods with the lowest improvement. Miller explained that the last question on the survey asked what the school district would like to do differently next year. Several schools answered that earlier referral would help promote a better outcome. Miller said that what the members of the truancy program agreed. The schools had a difficult time post-COVID-19 pandemic trying to get kids back into the routine of going to school. This caused referrals to be lower than typical years because schools wanted to give students a break getting back into the routine. The statistics showed that annual truancy showed a successful change from the prior year. There were 335 students that came through the initial referral and there were fewer students who came back following that. The truancy program saw this as an improvement. The total number of truancy petitions was 68. There was a 46 percent to 76 percent improvement across all of the programs that were offered from 2020 to 2021. Commissioner Mike Kaczmarek asked why there were no direct county attorney referrals from 2014-2015. Miller explained that this was a program that was introduced in 2021. County Attorney Brian Lutes said that he had heard from the schools that their biggest issues were truancy. He said when Health and Human Services (HHS) introduced this program in the Summer of 2021, he wanted to be involved via direct referral. HHS Director Jami Goodrum explained that before this program went through the County Attorney’s Office it went through HHS. It was then passed along to the County Attorney’s Office and the number of petitions from this transition was 16 in the past year. Goodrum said that schools felt that they lost a lot of control after the COVID -19 pandemic and said this was a great opportunity for the

06-20-22 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES Page 2 of 5 county to reevaluated its truancy program. She added that this was a highly court-driven process and social workers were at least one step removed from this process. Goodrum said that she and Court Services Director Mike MacMillan had been working on a reevaluation of this program. Goodrum and MacMillan wanted to simplify the program overall, add more staffing to be regionalized throughout the county and thought that a more direct path to the courts would streamline the processes with the families. Commissioner Mary Wetter asked what age range usually was involved in truancy. Miller answered that it was students over the age of 12. Wetter asked how many of these students would end up dropping out after an incident with truancy. Miller did not know an exact number but thought it was a handful of students from the survey results but explained that it was hard to tell with the option of online schooling. MacMillan explained that after discussion with HHS and the County Attorney’s Office, he thought it made sense to move the Truancy program into his department at Court Services. He saw that the difficulty would be getting to the end of the budget cycle and asked the board if it thought it was a good idea. MacMillan thought it made logical sense to move it to his agency. He added that at the end of a truancy these adolescents may end up with the Sheriff’s Office or court system and thought it would be good to have that relationship started already. He wanted to put the fiscal numbers associated with this transition into the 2023 budget request. MacMillan thought it would be best to put this on the next board agenda for approval to begin this transition of assuming responsibility of the Truancy program effective September 1, 2022. This would not include Educational Neglect and children under the age of 12, he explained that those students’ cases would stay with HHS. MacMillan requested additional staff to include a case aide and two social workers. He did not want to take staff away from HHS but rather create a new position. MacMillan wanted to use the term diversion within the community for continuity with the court system’s diversion program. He noted that if the child failed the diversion, he or she would then go through the court system processes. He thought that the current Attorney’s Office program would blend well with his proposed program. Commissioner Christine Husom thought this would be the best option for the truancy program. She understood the need for additional staff and said that the board had approved new positions before the budget process in the past, so this request was not unheard of. Commissioner Darek Vetsch asked if the $75,000 allocation was for the four-month gap. MacMillan said this was correct. Vetsch thought this four-month gap could be mitigated by a budget amendment. Goodrum clarified that she wanted to keep her two social workers who were working the truancy program at that time. She would in turn reduce her request for the number of social worker positions in the 2023 budget request. Goodrum wanted to increase the request to two social workers and one case aide who would all be absorbed into HHS. Vetsch thought Goodrum’s request was too ambiguous to approve. Goodrum explained that she did have a plan for the two social workers who she was requesting stay with HHS saying that the social workers within truancy would transition into the Relative Care Licensing positions which was an area of HHS with a great need. Miller said the other social worker would be a MnChoices Social Worker. Goodrum wanted to the board to take into account the high case load and mitigate potential employee burnout. Husom clarified that MacMillan was asking for one case aides and two social workers. MacMillan confirmed this was correct and his intention was to launch this before school starts in the Fall 2022. He said his department would be able to launch this by August 2022 so that the schools would be completely in the know going into the new school year. MacMillan understood that this was uncomfortable when considering budgets but reiterated that the timing was what was best for the schools. Kaczmarek thought that the schools get along with the HHS workers well and asked if it would be possible to move the social workers over to Court Services rather than hire on new employees. Vetsch clarified that it would not be as smooth a transition as it sounded in theory and explained that the positions of social worker versus probation agent were vastly different. Vetsch added that this truancy issue would take a different approach than how those current HHS social workers would approach it. Goodrum explained that the issue of truancy needed more of a punitive approach and noted that her social workers were working more on educational neglect for students under 12 years of age rather than on truancy. Husom agreed and thought students would take it more seriously if the courts system was involved. She thought the age range would need more of a court approach rather than a social worker approach. Vetsch wanted to warn the board against approving positions outside of the budget process. He was concerned that this would set a precedent for other departments. Commissioner Mark Daleiden thought this request would not have too much of an effect this year, but he wanted to look closer at the budget before making a final decision. Vetsch thought there were other positions in the budget forecast that might allow for a request of this nature. He reiterated that he thought it was dangerous to approve new positions outside of the budget process without the consideration of keeping the tax rate flat. MacMillan noted that

06-20-22 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES Page 3 of 5 he would not be asking for any other positions in the 2023 budget. After talking to Goodrum, he said that there were ongoing positions in other departments, and this was what made him feel comfortable bringing this forward to the board. Goodrum explained that this impact would be neutral for this budget due to the number of vacancies within her department. She said theses positions would be bringing more funding into the county. Vetsch agreed, but thought it was important to caution the board against approving these positions via this route especially going into the upcoming budget meeting. Husom added that Court Services had not made many position requests over the past 10 years which was what made her feel comfortable knowing it was not taking advantage of this request opportunity. Kaczmarek asked if these position shifts would require reclassification. MacMillan said it would not and that he would be absorbing the positions into his existing program. Kaczmarek asked Goodrum why she was requesting four positions when MacMillan thought he could get this job done with three positions. Goodrum explained that this was a valid request considering the increased need for social workers, the growth in the county, and the different approach her staff would take with Educational Neglect when compared with MacMillan’s approach to truancy. Vetsch thought this was a more individualized approach with HHS, rather than Court Services which was a much more direct and serious approach. He explained there were reasons why HHS was making this request as it warranted a very different approach. Goodrum noted that she shared six clients with Court Services. This transition would address the issue Court Services and HHS were having where more than one person was working on the same case. Husom said that providing the fourth position to HHS would allow Court Services to take the two new positions. Goodrum added that it was important to have this change implemented at the start of the school year. Husom agreed and suggested a Safe Schools meeting would be the best time to introduce this change. MacMillan thought this would clean up the process and added that he had Wright County judges that wanted to get involved with this process directly. Goodrum said this transition would be good because Court Services has a relationship with the courts in a way HHS did not. She thought this would help the truancy concerns in a better way than she could on her end. Lutes thought this would be a more unified approach and would allow him to be less involved in a direct referral aspect. Kaczmarek said entertaining budget requests in the off-season may create a precedent that departments can do this going forward. Vetsch thought the board should move forward with the requested change and proceed in posting the positions. He recommended having those positions stay within HHS with an ultimate review at budget time in order to start this process before the school year starts. He wanted to start the process and implement the changes moving forward in order to improve truancy. Daleiden asked how the relationship with the truancy program compares to the wRight Choice program. Juvenile Team Supervisor Tammi Solarz wanted to utilize the wRight Choice program more going forward with truancy students and said that she had worked with Nate Hanson who runs the wRight Choice program in regard to how he envisioned the relationship in the future. Hanson and Solarz saw that one of the obstacles that stood in the way of getting students back to school was the fear of being behind in their schoolwork. She thought having wRight Choice involved was a huge help because that program could help mitigate this fear for students by assisting in getting them caught up with their schoolwork and ultimately back into school. Daleiden asked if the county was duplicating programs that were already active programs within school districts throughout the county. Solarz explained that the wRight Choice program was for students who would traditionally have been suspended and kept home. This program allows them to keep learning and on the same pace which was the difference from other alternative education programs. Husom agreed and said it didn’t make sense to keep kids at home who are acting up because that would not improve the problem. RECOMMENDATION: Move forward with the transfer of the truancy program to Court Services with the addition of two new Social Worker positions and one new Case Aide position. Review the option of new full-time Social Workers in Health and Human Services when the 2023 Budget discussions take place.

II. Update on American Rescue Plan (ARP) Program Project Administrator Elizabeth Karels presented American Rescue Plan (ARP) program updates to the board. The initial allocation was $26.8 million and all but $1.2 million had been allocated. For Business and Economic Relief there were three grants that totaled $320,000 and were granted to recipients Wright County 4-H, Community Dental Care, and the Cokato Charitable Trust for replacement furniture. Kaczmarek asked if the $200,000 granted for the Economic Assistance for Community Dental Care was funding in lieu of using the fund balance, in that same amount, from Dental

06-20-22 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES Page 4 of 5 Clinic Construction shortage. Karels explained that amount was unrelated to construction costs but rather to offset the lease costs for the first couple years due to negative impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. $66,000 was granted to education, jobs and training and used for technology support and training for seniors. Kaczmarek asked how much time would pass before the in-progress items would be completed. Karels said everything needed to be obligated by the end of 2024 and paid by the end of 2026. Daleiden noted that all reimbursements would need to have receipts to be reimbursed. Karels introduced the next category which was family grants. The Volunteer Recruitment for Safe Families closed but it was reimbursed before that. Infrastructure was the next category in which Broadband had a number of projects still in progress. The Broadband Feasibility Study used almost $70,000 and was closed. She explained that every grant she presented was a reimbursement grant. She explained that only seven cities had applied for the Water and Sewer Grant, and she encouraged the commissioners to share this information with their cities who were not included so those cities could have access to this assistance as well. Another infrastructure project was the Water Quality Improvement Project. Both the Otsego Streambank Restoration Expansion and the Basins and Grade Stabilization on the North Fork Crow River were closed, and the total granted for both projects was $147,764. Husom thought the Otsego Restoration Expansion had turned out incredibly well. The next category was Internal County Expenses. There were a number of projects that were still in progress to include the Administration Time Project, Consultant Support, Customer Flow Management System, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and other supplies, and testing supplies. The total of in-progress and closed grants and programs for this category was $10,820,487. Karels noted that the Customer Flow Management System was in the HHS lobby and Licensing Center. She explained that there are a few items on the list that are underspent, and she wanted to reallocate these funds in time to transition the funding to other projects. She asked the board if it was opposed to staff making recommendations for the reallocations. The board agreed it was open to recommendations. Vetsch thought it was important to spend this before the money disappeared at the start of the new budget cycle. Karels explained that there was a clause in the project policies that allowed for annual review of funding and consideration for continuing the program or reallocate the funds. Daleiden thought it was important to have the funds designated by the end of 2024. Vetsch thought it would be important for staff to make those recommendations. Kaczmarek asked if Karels thought there would be less of a need for outside consultants going forward. Karels thought the county had too many consultants the prior year, but did recommend keeping a relationship with Baker Tilly US, LLP since it still reviews eligibility for more complex programs. She thought that Flaherty and Hood, PA had not been utilized and this relationship could cease causing a reduction in the funding allocation. III. 2021 Community Health Assessment ARP Fund Allocation Report Director of Public Health Sarah Grosshuesch presented the results from the 2021 Community Health Survey to the board. She noted that Wright County received $26,878,110 from the American Rescue Plan and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARP-SLFRF) program. The funds from this program had to be obligated by the end of 2024 and spent by the end of 2026. Grosshuesch noted that the survey results were free responses not multiple choices. Public Health Promotion Specialist Joel Torkelson explained that staff had put in a lot of time and energy to analyze the data. They added the question “As Wright County prioritizes support across communities with COVID-19 recovery funds, what areas of concern do you think we should address?” to the Community Health Survey. HHS received 684 survey responses to this question. Public Health Promotion Specialist Gregory Wise said that from the 684 comments that were received he and his team created a work group within Public Health. He said the respondents may have addressed multiple issues within their responses and not simply answered with one suggested use for recovery funds. Wise explained that due to the open-ended nature of the question, this question produced 1,043 comments which he used to then create 10 themes. The 10 themes were economic, COVID-19, healthcare, mental health, education, food, public safety, substance use, diversity/equity/inclusion and a miscellaneous category. He explained that he and his group tried to take the path of least interpretation in order to keep the potential solutions all encompassing. Within those 10 themes, subcategories were created. The top five most common themes included economic, COVID-19, healthcare, mental health and miscellaneous. The work group wanted to get an idea of how many comments were being received from each category and were ranked on a scale of most to least referred, but this was not necessarily indicative of importance level. Grosshuesch explained that her staff originally went into this project with its own verbiage and ideas but transitioned over to the language the board was using in order to promote continuity. The funding categories came out to be and

06-20-22 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES Page 5 of 5 included Education, jobs and training, families, support to schools, and mental health. Grosshuesch noted that the time of the survey was at the end of the summer when most of the programs were coming to an end. She explained that some comments were clearer than others, but the work group tried to take them all into consideration. For example, a vague request made to “keep students safe”, the work group interpreted as safe from the dangers of COVID-19 as well as safe from other dangers students may come across. Torkelson highlighted some of the data from the survey. He said in addition to the comments the work group had data to compare and contrast. The survey asked 8,000 residents about the delay of care to include care regarding medical and mental health. The work group received 1,550 survey responses which showed 25 percent of respondents reported delaying or not getting care in the past 12 months. 35 percent of those who delayed care said COVID-19 was a reason why there was delayed care. As for mental health, 15 percent reported delaying or not getting care in the past 12 months. Of that 15 percent, 14 percent of those who delayed care said COVID-19 was a reason why. The ability for residents to see providers remotely could have helped mitigate this delay in health and mental health care. Torkelson said that 18 percent of respondents reported delaying or not getting dental care in the past 12 months. Of that 18 percent, 29 percent reported the delayed care was a COVID-19 related delay for dental care. He said the work group asked the survey takers if they had experienced any loss related to COVID-19 and the top five answers were 40 percent of respondents noted social connectedness, 36 percent reported no loss related to COVID-19, 35 percent reported recreation or entertainment loss, 18 percent reported exercise opportunity loss, and 17 percent reported regular school routine loss. Torkelson noted that this total percentage did not equal 100 percent because the respondents had the ability to answer with more than one loss. Goodrum shared the recommendations that came out of the survey results. Her first recommendation was to involve community members in solutions. The second recommendation was to use evidence-based programs and other resources for program development. The third recommendation was to use existing community resource providers. The fourth recommendation was to prioritize funding toward areas emphasized in both community survey and county priority setting. The fifth recommendation was to reduce barriers and eliminate undue cost to community members during recovery. Goodrum gave the example of waiving fees that could assist with families and businesses in economic recovery, for instance foster care fees. She said she and Karels had met to discuss the priorities and current projects. Goodrum said there was one project that could be closed out and thought it was important to talk about how to best take advantage of other opportunities. Social Services Manager Jill Pooler said the co-responder model was going through the State Legislator and starting in July 2022 it would be a part of Medical Assistance (MA) bill. Pooler noted this could be a potential funding source. She said the safer the communities were, the lower the mental health crisis would potentially keep those with mental health issues out of the jail system. Pooler explained that this was an example of a request that was currently up for recommendation. She thought that having community partners assist with these recommendations would assist making this long term. Pooler said that in the Sheriff’s Office it was looking to increase its jail staff, increasing hours from part-time to full-time. She said the jail had usually seen 25 to 30 adults in a designated timeframe but were currently seeing close to 50 adults in that same timeframe. Goodrum understood that the board did not like to use these funds for employment positions but noted that this might be the time to make a change and use those funds for an alternate purpose to achieve the same goal. Grosshuesch talked about a grant funding source that would need to be approved by the state and expressed that she would want to send the program to an alternate funding source. Goodrum added that she thought there were great opportunities for connectedness funding. Goodrum explained that programs come and go but pointed out that positions could be reutilized. She thought that reclassifying and utilizing the staff positions that HHS already had been allocated was important to do. She had reclassified several positions when the need presented itself rather than petitioning the board for a new position. Kaczmarek asked how the Public Health Survey work group decided where to send the 8,000 surveys. Grosshuesch explained that it filed per district and the group used an outside contractor to provide mailing lists, which were randomized to select who the survey was sent to. Daleiden said there was no guarantee that each district would respond equally. Grosshuesch said the work group had not tied the comments to commissioner districts and she thought this level of review was unnecessary. Kaczmarek thought it was important for the commissioners to be able to explain to their constituents that the survey was sent out in an equal and fair way. The meeting adjourned at 11:38 a.m. Committee of the Whole Minutes submitted by Laine Stephan, Office Manager.



COMMITTEE MEETING RECOMMENDATIONS

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

JUNE 20, 2022

I. Discussion Regarding Truancy

RECOMMENDATION: Move forward with the transfer of the truancy program to Court Services with the addition of

two new Social Worker positions and one new Case Aide position. Review the option of new full-time Social Workers in

Health and Human Services when the 2023 Budget discussions take place.

District 1District 2District 3District 4District 5

Christine HusomDarek VetschMark DaleidenMary WetterMichael Kaczmarek

COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES

PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS

JUNE 22, 2022

DATE APPROVED: [ ]

Members Present: Darek Vetsch, Mark Daleiden, Schawn Johnson

Members Absent: None

Lee Kelly, Clay Wilfahrt, Marc Mattice, Laine Stephan, Lori Pawelk, Mike MacMillan, Lindsey Meyer, Heather Lemieux, Tim Dahl, Jami Goodrum

(Remote Attendees): Patsy Waytashek, Phil Hodges, Tony Rasmuson, Greg Kryzer,Tanya West, Trinity Nathe, Zachary Robideau, Matthew Fomby, Barb Peterson, Jodi Topel, John Holler, Steve Jobe, Tonia Persons


I. Taxpayer Services/Elections Organizational DiscussionAssistant County Administrator Marc Mattice said over the past two months, organizational discussions had occurred with the Department Heads involved in the Taxpayer Services and Elections Organization. These discussions aimed to understand employee roles, how work is getting done, how job functions are shared, and how to understand, appreciate, and value employees’ work. Mattice explained that through these discussions, everyone involved had gained a deeper appreciation of the shared business processes across the organization.

Mattice said that through this process the collective goal was to keep in mind the County’s Vision Statement when approaching changes. The vision which promoted a great quality of life with education, opportunity, relaxation, and prosperity at your doorstep. Mattice added that the Department Heads also kept in mind the main strategic objective of improving operational excellence. The group of representatives from the departments evaluated internal, external and shared responsibilities as well as reviewed and documented workflows and relationships to create business process maps and tasks. Having this discussion and knowledge base allowed the group to better understand departmental functions. Mattice said the group also discussed how work within one department can affect other departments, how customers were served and whether the current state provided exceptional service. Mattice discussed ideas to help build an understanding of communication between shared functions, and what would be the optimal organization.

There is a need to continually identify, build and enhance relationships and understanding the interdependence of business processes between departments. The following questions were to be considered when making organizational changes. Are there improvements to handing off tasks and collaboration? For each shared process, who is the owner, who is responsible, who is a contributor, and who is a user? What are the boundaries? Are there timelines/deadlines, and how do these affect others? How do we implement a continuous and collaborative process improvement method? What is the clear vision of where the County needs to go?

Commissioner Darek Vetsch asked if the county board should expect budget changes or new position requests due to this organizational change. Mattice said the group was considering one or two reclassifications, but he could not say specifically where the reclassifications would happen. Mattice did not foresee a request for additional staffing at that time. Vetsch asked if he could expect a potential organizational chart at the July Personnel and Employee Relations Committee meeting. Mattice said that the intention was to have a few different options for the committee to consider.

06-22-22 PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES Page 2 of 4

Commissioner Mark Daleiden asked for an update on the elections processes and staff. Finance & Taxpayer Services Director Lindsey Meyer said former Technology Coordinator Tyler Webster had been promoted to Elections Manager. The Technology Coordinator position was open and posted in several different places and had no applicants after two weeks. Meyer noted that after having a conversation about the need to fill this position with Information Technology (IT) Director Matthew Fomby, an applicant had been found. Assistant Human Resources Director Lori Pawelk explained that it was a unique position to fill.

County Administrator Lee Kelly updated the committee regarding the transition of Highway Department staff over toCentralized Finance. He said this change would take place in conjunction with the start of the next pay period onMonday, June 27 along with the centralization of moving over some Health and Human Services staff to Finance as well.Meyer said both sides agreed that this change was necessary. She noted that there would need to be ongoingconversations about centralization to make sure departments remained on the same page and that customer service needs were met. Meyer said that once everything was settled, the departments would have a better understanding of if there needed to be additional changes going forward.

RECOMMENDATION: Have staff produce a projected organizational chart for potential reorganization across Departments.

II. Revisions to Personnel Policy 301.07 Extend Sick Leave BankMattice explained that this policy revision had come as a recommendation from the Employee Retention Work Group(R.A.I.S.E.). Mattice then worked closely with the Human Resources Department to discuss the best way to address the recommended changes and policy updates. He explained that he thought this change promoted the county’s goal of retention of the long-term employees that had switched over to Paid Time Off (PTO) in 2016. The draft language designated a sick leave bank for qualified Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) events that may happen throughout the year.

He said that if there was a non-qualifying FMLA event, the leave cap would be increased to 30 days rather than 15 days. Daleiden asked if this would affect additional payouts. Vetsch said it could lessen the payout, but the highest payout was 35 percent and less than 10 percent of employees were at that point. Pawelk said there were not a lot of employees thathad an Emergency Sick Leave Bank (ESLB) that this policy would apply to. She explained that policy would be a retention tool for the employees who had used their PTO, sick and vacation time off prudently and had accumulated high banks of vacation or sick leave. This would then go into their ESLB and allow employees to utilize this leave time. Pawelk added that this could be used outside of an FMLA event. Human Resources Director Schawn Johnson said that about 111 employees had ESLB and that those employees’ averages were about 200 hours. Vetsch said that in addition to this policy update being good for employees it also had a small short-term effect and a limited long-term usage, which made him feel comfortable recommending this policy update. Johnson noted that this would be a way for the county to assist its long-term employees who had a dire need to utilize these hours.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve the revisions to Personnel Policy 301.07 Extended Sick Leave Bank.

III. Request Approval To Fill Position OF Risk Management SpecialistKelly said that this conversation was coming out of December’s discussions on strategic planning. He explained that with the agreement to hire two Assistant County Administrators and moving Projects Administration, Administration would hold Administration Specialist and Risk Management Specialist positions open. Kelly said he was coming to the committee today to request the Risk Management Specialist position be filled.

Assistant County Administrator Clay Wilfahrt said that Risk Manager Tim Dahl currently managed 29 safety programsacross the county to ensure compliance with Minnesota Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)standards. Dahl also managed several regulatory programs through organizations that included the Department of Transportation (MnDOT), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Department of Labor and Industry (DLI), and many more. Wilfahrt added that Dahl also managed insurance claims through the Minnesota Counties


Intergovernmental Trust (MCIT) and other insurers, preformed contract reviews and submitted Request for Board Action (RFBA) forms for Risk Management concerns. This along with several other miscellaneous tasks throughout the day to include building safety, workplace violence prevention, panic button implementation and management, fire extinguisherregulation, chemical safety regulation, and workers compensation claims, was why Dahl had such a need for a Risk Management Specialist. Wilfahrt added that as of May 1, 2022, there were 43 workers compensation claims and aprojected total of 100 claims for the 2022 Fiscal Year. In the 2021 Fiscal Year there were 96 workers compensationclaims and the years prior from 2018 to 2020 the number workers compensation claims were consistently between 40 to 50 each year. This clearly illustrated the rising need for a Risk Management Specialist.

Daleiden asked if the county still had an active Return-to-Work Program. Dahl confirmed the county did and explained that it was a very effective program that enhanced the relationship that between the county and its employees in addition to saving the county money. There had been a rising number of mental illness issues that were highly complex andproduced equally complex written documents and follow-ups that were time consuming. Vetsch appreciated that mental illness claims would be hard to manage and noted that a physical injury workers compensation claim was entirely different. Vetsch asked how a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) claim started when there was typically not a First Report of Injury. Dahl said these claims usually came out of FMLA events. Once an employee’s 480 hours of FMLA were used up, this was the point when the employee typically filed a report with the assistance of legal counsel. Dahl said he would work closely with Johnson and added that there were several time-consuming steps and follow-up that neededto be done. Vetsch said documenting these cases sounded very convoluted and hard to manage. Johnson said all claims of that nature were particularly unique and, in some situations, there would be a possibility that the employee never returned.

Wilfahrt added that mental health cases were not as cut and dried as physical injuries, for example a broken arm. Wilfahrt noted that the county population had grown by 60 percent since 2000 when the Risk Management position was first created. He said that having a Risk Management Specialist would allow the county to move from a reactive position on Risk Management to a proactive one. There could be more walk-throughs that catch potential risk factors and mitigatethem. Dahl was the only employee trained to do succession planning. Wilfahrt said there was a need to train someoneelse but did not have the current staffing to achieve this nor did he want to take away from other employees’ designated duties.

Daleiden asked if the Sheriff’s Office would be able to provide an employee to assist in filling these occupational needs.Wilfahrt said that he and Dahl had talked about the potential of having a dispatcher fill in for this role. He explained that there were options, one of them being the addition of a Risk Management Specialist. Wilfahrt said there were not manypeople trained to do this specific type of work. In Risk Management, there tended to be a lot of gray area whereturnaround time and other procedures were left up to interpretation. Wilfahrt explained that having a designated team in the county to address Risk Management issues county-wide would create consistency across departments, rather than having the same claim handled differently in different departments. The expectation of the Risk Management Specialistwould be for that individual to take on more administration paperwork in addition to onsite inspections. This in turn would free up Dahl, allowing him to focus more on policy, budget, and more specific planning objectives.

Dahl gave the example of testing panic buttons as something he could pass onto a Risk Management Specialist as it was not the best use of his time. He gave other examples where he was pulled away from bigger picture items to deal with smaller items, but which required an immediate response. Wilfahrt noted that not all counties that were comparable insize to Wright County had multiple positions, but he thought it was important in order to promote consistency. Dahladded that counties were doing risk management on some level but calling it something different. Dahl suggested the idea that the Risk Management Specialist’s pay be based on the work completed. Vetsch said that he took this information seriously.

Dahl understood that Wright County was unique in regard to its risk management division and wanted to help customizethe new position to fit the needs of the county. The overview of the Risk Management Specialist position was in the 2022 budget with a hourly range of $27.41 to $38.36. The County Board had placed this position on hold due to the hiring of a


second Assistant County Administrator position. The staff recommendation was that the Personnel and Employee Relations Committee move in approving this position. Daleiden asked Meyer and Assistant Finance Director Heather Lemieux about budget to actual for payroll for the whole county. Lemieux ran a budget to actual report, which stated that the General Fund was at $24 million of the budgeted $57 million. She noted that this put the county at 42 percent of the budget for the year.

Vetsch asked if there was a need for an additional Administrative Specialist or if that position hold could be shifted over to become the Risk Management Specialist. Kelly did not see a need to fill the open Administrative Specialist position at this time but was not willing to altogether release it. Vetsch asked if Kelly would be willing to relinquish the Administrative Specialist position if he did not plan to fill it within the next 60 days. Kelly said there needed to be an open discussion to delve into the release of that particular position but that at this time he was not willing to release the Administrative Specialist position. Daleiden asked for a clearer idea of where Administration was at in regard to the Full-Time Employee (FTE) budget. Kelly said there were a lot of moving parts and that an IT position had been eliminated which created available funds for hiring. However, he also noted that Administration hired two Administrative Specialists which accounted for $64,000. Kelly said that there had also been staff turnover to consider. He did not want to debate the specifics of positions that had been filled and turned over but reiterated Lemieux’s statement that the county was in a good position overall to fill this new Risk Management position.

Wilfahrt thought there was a consensus among the members of the committee that the Risk Management Specialist position would be a value to the county. He asked how the committee thought he should move forward with the hiring process. Daleiden thought it would take time to fill this position and Johnson agreed due to the position requiring a special skill set. He thought it would take at least two months to find applicants. Johnson suggested the committee pursue a candidate in the insurance realm and train them into risk management. Vetsch thought the best option was toapprove the Risk Management Specialist position with the swap from the open Administrative Specialist position. Wilfahrt said he would need to consult with staff to be sure taking away this position was feasible.

Pawelk asked if this position was going to report to Dahl since his title was not a supervisory position. Johnson recommended the Risk Management Specialist report to him, and Dahl would serve as a lead similar to Pawelk’srelationship to the three Human Resources Representatives. Johnson added that in time this could be adjusted as need be. Dahl pointed out that not all positions would be revenue generating, but there was still a benefit to the county. Vetsch added that filling this position could potentially save the county money in the long run by mitigating issues more efficiently. Daleiden requested that all of the information presented at the meeting be sent to the rest of the County Board so it can have a complete picture of benefits of filling this position.

RECOMMENDATION: Transfer the open Administrative Specialist position to Risk Management to create the position of Risk Management Specialist.

The meeting adjourned at 9:56 a.m.Minutes submitted by Delia Scepaniak, Administrative Specialist.



COMMITTEE MEETING RECOMMENDATIONS

PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS

JUNE 22, 2022

I. Taxpayer Services/Elections Organizational Discussion

RECOMMENDATION: Have staff produce a projected organizational chart for potential reorganization across

Departments.

II. Revisions to Personnel Policy 301.07 Extend Sick Leave Bank RECOMMENDATION: Approve the revisions to Personnel Policy 301.07 Extended Sick Leave Bank.

III. Request Approval To Fill Position OF Risk Management Specialist RECOMMENDATION: Transfer the open Administrative Specialist position to Risk Management to create the position

of Risk Management Specialist.

301 PAID TIME OFF (PTO) Policy Adopted: 12-16-16 Policy Effective: 01-01-17 Amended: 08-15-17 Amended: 10-19-21

301 Paid Time Off (PTO) Plan – Non-union Employees 301.01 PTO Policy It is the policy of Wright County to provide paid time away from work to eligible employees. This policy is implemented by the means of the PTO Plan contained herein, which covers all paid leave previously available under Wright County’s vacation, sick, and bereavement leave policies prior to January 1, 2017, and combines these prior benefits into a single plan. PTO can be utilized for any purpose, subject only to necessary department request and approval procedures consistent with Wright County policies so customer service and work requirements are not adversely impacted. 301.02 PTO Eligibility and Availability PTO with pay shall be granted to all full- and part-time regular Wright County employees. PTO is earned on a pay period by pay period basis and may be taken in full up through the last pay period worked. PTO cannot be used on an employee’s last day of employment. Employees can carry over any PTO that does not exceed the stated cap. No additional accrual will occur above the cap. PTO is available for use by all eligible full- and part-time regular Wright County employees following the pay period in which it is accrued. There is no waiting period upon hire to begin using accrued PTO. 301.03 Accrual Rates and Maximums PTO benefits shall be accrued at the following rate for full-time staff. Part-time staff are awarded PTO at the same rate of accrual as full-time staff, except that their accrual and maximum carry-over is prorated based on hours worked. PTO hours do not count towards computing an employee’s eligible overtime hours.

Accrual Rates and Maximums for non-union, full-time staff. Non-exempt, part-time staff accrual and carry-over is prorated based on hours worked.

Years of Service

Annual Accrual Rate Prorated (hours / days)

Accrual Rate Formula

(hours earned per hour compensated)

Max Carry-Over Prorated

(hours/days )

*Max Payout Prorated upon separation in good standing

(hours / days)

0-1 160 / 20 0.0770 840/105 320/40

2-3 168 / 21 0.0808 840/105 336/42

4-6 192 / 24 0.0923 840/105 384/48

7-10 208 / 26 0.1000 840/105 416/52

11-15 232 / 29 0.1115 840/105 464/58

16-20 248 / 31 0.1192 840/105 496/62

21+ 272 / 34 0.1308 840/105 544/68

Non-union employees shall not accrue more than 272 hours prorated of PTO annually. PTO will be forfeited when an employee reaches the maximum carry-over unless eligible to contribute 3.08 hours per pay period into catastrophic sick time as outlined in subsection 301.08 Catastrophic Sick Time.

*Maximum payout upon separation in good standing is equivalent to two (2) times the annual accrual rate based on years of service. PTO is accrued per hour compensated per pay period and may be used subsequent to being earned in increments of .25 hours at a time. When the employee’s length of service reaches the next higher rate of accrual, accrual at the new rate shall begin the first day of the pay period following the date of eligibility. PTO shall not accrue during a period of unpaid leave of absence. PTO balances are paid out at 100%, up to the maximum payout, upon separation in good standing from employment. PTO payout will be placed into a Post-Employment Retirement Health Care Savings Plan account or paid out as taxable earnings based upon the plan documents. The Plan documents for the Post Employment Retirement Health Care Savings Plan are on file in the Administration Department.

This policy and the County’s other policies, procedures, and other written documents, no matter how detailed, do not create a contractual right or equitable right to paid time off (PTO, vacation, or sick leave) or similar forms of compensation (Time off accrual). The County specifically retains the right to change the terms of the described time off accruals and related terms at any time without notice to employees. There is no contractual right to time off accrual as described herein, and related documents and this paragraph shall be understood as an effective disclaimer of any claim for time off accruals. 301.04 PTO Credit for Applicable Experience within Field Persons newly hired or promoted to non-union exempt positions who have been employed on a full-time basis in their respective fields, with less than one (1) year break in employment prior to entering Wright County service, and upon proper verification, may receive added PTO credit for this employment at the County’s discretion. This credit shall not exceed four (4) years. This additional credit for applicable experience within the field will be applied to the employees PTO accrual effective date of hire. 301.05 Scheduling Non-emergency use must be requested in advance. PTO requests should be submitted to the supervisor as far in advance as practical. While every effort will be made to give employees the time off of their preference, time off will be scheduled so as not to cause an interruption in the normal operation of the department and in service to the public. Should a conflict in scheduling occur, it will be resolved on the basis of the timing of the request and/or the employee’s prior utilization of PTO pertaining to department/unit approval of employee requests for PTO (specifically around holidays). Emergency and/or unplanned use of PTO requires immediate notification to the supervisor. Notification of absence should be made in accordance with department procedure. If a specific department procedure does not exist, notification should be made on the first day of absence or as soon as possible, but no later than one hour after the normal reporting time. Inappropriate use of the PTO plan may subject the employee to disciplinary action. 301.06 Medical Certification Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) may apply to PTO requests for medical reasons. Minimally, absences for medical reasons of more than three (3) working days may require a physician’s statement stating the cause of use. This will be used to determine if a leave of absence should be

initiated and if FMLA applies. Physician’s notes may be required as early as the first day of absence in some situations and/or in accordance with department procedures. A statement attesting to the employee’s ability to return to work and perform the essential functions of that employee’s position may also be required before the employee returns to work. 301.07 Extended Sick Leave Bank (ESLB) Employees hired before December 31, 2016, may have hours converted to the Extended Sick Leave Bank (ESLB) according to the conversion polices of Wright County’s PTO Plan approved by the Wright County Board on December 20, 2016. Hours converted to ESLB may be used for illness or disability for an FMLA qualifying event for the employee or to care for an immediate family member under the policies in effect on 12/31/16 (Section 301-Paid Time Off) for the use of ESLB sick leave. For non-qualifying FMLA events, employees that have absence due to illness, disability, or injury may use ESLB hours after all PTO has been exhausted down to thirty (30) days or thirty (30) days prorated based upon the employee’s FTE status. Human Resources may require acceptable medical verification that the absence qualifies under FMLA or the sick leave requirements before approving use of ESLB time. Employees eligible to participate in the ESLB will be allowed to access their ESLB, without depleting any PTO, for treatment of a serious health condition that qualifies as an FMLA event. FMLA, through 2017. Effective January 1, 2018, absences due to illness, disability or injury may be taken from ESLB after all PTO has been exhausted down to thirty (30) days or thirty (30) days prorated based upon the employee’s FTE status. Wright County will pay to all employees, at the time of separation in good standing, unused ESLB time at the employees’ then current level of compensation according to the following schedule:

ESLB Pay Out Schedule

Years of Service Percent of Accrued

ESLB

Less than 2 None

2-5 10%

6-10 15%

11-15 25%

16+ 35%

ESLB payout will be placed into a Post-Employment Retirement Health Care Savings Plan account or paid out as taxable earnings. This policy and the County’s other policies, procedures, and other written documents, no matter how detailed, do not create a contractual right or equitable right to paid time off, vacation time, or similar forms of compensation (“Time Off Accrual”). The County specifically retains the right to change the terms of the described time off accruals and related terms at any time without notice to employees. There is no contractual right to time off accrual as described herein, and related documents and this paragraph shall be understood as an effective disclaimer of any claim for time off accrual. 301.08 CATASTROPHIC SICK TIME An employee may accrue catastrophic sick time upon attainment of 840 hours of regular PTO. Catastrophic sick time accrues in a separate account at the rate of 3.08 hours per pay period (one-half the minimum PTO accrual rate of 6.16 hours per pay period) for each pay period that an employee maintains a balance of 840 hours and does not use PTO in said pay period. In the event of catastrophic illness or injury, an employee may use time available in their catastrophic sick bank for the employee or an immediate family member as defined in the sick leave policy after exhausting all PTO hours down to fifteen (15) days prorated based upon FTE status and all ESLB hours. Catastrophic sick time is not compensable upon separation of employment in good standing or otherwise.

301 PAID TIME OFF (PTO) Policy Adopted: 12-16-16 Policy Effective: 01-01-17 Amended: 08-15-17 Amended: 10-19-21

301 Paid Time Off (PTO) Plan – Non-union Employees 301.01 PTO Policy It is the policy of Wright County to provide paid time away from work to eligible employees. This policy is implemented by the means of the PTO Plan contained herein, which covers all paid leave previously available under Wright County’s vacation, sick, and bereavement leave policies prior to January 1, 2017, and combines these prior benefits into a single plan. PTO can be utilized for any purpose, subject only to necessary department request and approval procedures consistent with Wright County policies so customer service and work requirements are not adversely impacted. 301.02 PTO Eligibility and Availability PTO with pay shall be granted to all full- and part-time regular Wright County employees. PTO is earned on a pay period by pay period basis and may be taken in full up through the last pay period worked. PTO cannot be used on an employee’s last day of employment. Employees can carry over any PTO that does not exceed the stated cap. No additional accrual will occur above the cap. PTO is available for use by all eligible full- and part-time regular Wright County employees following the pay period in which it is accrued. There is no waiting period upon hire to begin using accrued PTO. 301.03 Accrual Rates and Maximums PTO benefits shall be accrued at the following rate for full-time staff. Part-time staff are awarded PTO at the same rate of accrual as full-time staff, except that their accrual and maximum carry-over is prorated based on hours worked. PTO hours do not count towards computing an employee’s eligible overtime hours.

Accrual Rates and Maximums for non-union, full-time staff. Non-exempt, part-time staff accrual and carry-over is prorated based on hours worked.

Years of Service

Annual Accrual Rate Prorated (hours / days)

Accrual Rate Formula

(hours earned per hour compensated)

Max Carry-Over Prorated

(hours/days )

*Max Payout Prorated upon separation in good standing

(hours / days)

0-1 160 / 20 0.0770 840/105 320/40

2-3 168 / 21 0.0808 840/105 336/42

4-6 192 / 24 0.0923 840/105 384/48

7-10 208 / 26 0.1000 840/105 416/52

11-15 232 / 29 0.1115 840/105 464/58

16-20 248 / 31 0.1192 840/105 496/62

21+ 272 / 34 0.1308 840/105 544/68

Non-union employees shall not accrue more than 272 hours prorated of PTO annually. PTO will be forfeited when an employee reaches the maximum carry-over unless eligible to contribute 3.08 hours per pay period into catastrophic sick time as outlined in subsection 301.08 Catastrophic Sick Time.

*Maximum payout upon separation in good standing is equivalent to two (2) times the annual accrual rate based on years of service. PTO is accrued per hour compensated per pay period and may be used subsequent to being earned in increments of .25 hours at a time. When the employee’s length of service reaches the next higher rate of accrual, accrual at the new rate shall begin the first day of the pay period following the date of eligibility. PTO shall not accrue during a period of unpaid leave of absence. PTO balances are paid out at 100%, up to the maximum payout, upon separation in good standing from employment. PTO payout will be placed into a Post-Employment Retirement Health Care Savings Plan account or paid out as taxable earnings based upon the plan documents. The Plan documents for the Post Employment Retirement Health Care Savings Plan are on file in the Administration Department.

This policy and the County’s other policies, procedures, and other written documents, no matter how detailed, do not create a contractual right or equitable right to paid time off (PTO, vacation, or sick leave) or similar forms of compensation (Time off accrual). The County specifically retains the right to change the terms of the described time off accruals and related terms at any time without notice to employees. There is no contractual right to time off accrual as described herein, and related documents and this paragraph shall be understood as an effective disclaimer of any claim for time off accruals. 301.04 PTO Credit for Applicable Experience within Field Persons newly hired or promoted to non-union exempt positions who have been employed on a full-time basis in their respective fields, with less than one (1) year break in employment prior to entering Wright County service, and upon proper verification, may receive added PTO credit for this employment at the County’s discretion. This credit shall not exceed four (4) years. This additional credit for applicable experience within the field will be applied to the employees PTO accrual effective date of hire. 301.05 Scheduling Non-emergency use must be requested in advance. PTO requests should be submitted to the supervisor as far in advance as practical. While every effort will be made to give employees the time off of their preference, time off will be scheduled so as not to cause an interruption in the normal operation of the department and in service to the public. Should a conflict in scheduling occur, it will be resolved on the basis of the timing of the request and/or the employee’s prior utilization of PTO pertaining to department/unit approval of employee requests for PTO (specifically around holidays). Emergency and/or unplanned use of PTO requires immediate notification to the supervisor. Notification of absence should be made in accordance with department procedure. If a specific department procedure does not exist, notification should be made on the first day of absence or as soon as possible, but no later than one hour after the normal reporting time. Inappropriate use of the PTO plan may subject the employee to disciplinary action. 301.06 Medical Certification Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) may apply to PTO requests for medical reasons. Minimally, absences for medical reasons of more than three (3) working days may require a physician’s statement stating the cause of use. This will be used to determine if a leave of absence should be

initiated and if FMLA applies. Physician’s notes may be required as early as the first day of absence in some situations and/or in accordance with department procedures. A statement attesting to the employee’s ability to return to work and perform the essential functions of that employee’s position may also be required before the employee returns to work. 301.07 Extended Sick Leave Bank (ESLB) Employees hired before December 31, 2016, may have hours converted to the Extended Sick Leave Bank (ESLB) according to the conversion polices of Wright County’s PTO Plan approved by the Wright County Board on December 20, 2016. Hours converted to ESLB may be used for illness or disability for an FMLA qualifying event for the employee or to care for an immediate family member under the policies in effect (Section 301-Paid Time Off) for the use of ESLB sick leave. For non-qualifying FMLA events, employees that have absence due to illness, disability, or injury may use ESLB hours after all PTO has been exhausted down to thirty (30) days or thirty (30) days prorated based upon the employee’s FTE status. Human Resources may require acceptable medical verification that the absence qualifies under FMLA or the sick leave requirements before approving use of ESLB time. Employees eligible to participate in the ESLB will be allowed to access their ESLB, without depleting any PTO, for treatment of a serious health condition that qualifies as an FMLA event. Wright County will pay to all employees, at the time of separation in good standing, unused ESLB time at the employees’ then current level of compensation according to the following schedule:

ESLB Pay Out Schedule

Years of Service Percent of Accrued

ESLB

Less than 2 None

2-5 10%

6-10 15%

11-15 25%

16+ 35%

ESLB payout will be placed into a Post-Employment Retirement Health Care Savings Plan account or paid out as taxable earnings.

This policy and the County’s other policies, procedures, and other written documents, no matter how detailed, do not create a contractual right or equitable right to paid time off, vacation time, or similar forms of compensation (“Time Off Accrual”). The County specifically retains the right to change the terms of the described time off accruals and related terms at any time without notice to employees. There is no contractual right to time off accrual as described herein, and related documents and this paragraph shall be understood as an effective disclaimer of any claim for time off accrual. 301.08 CATASTROPHIC SICK TIME An employee may accrue catastrophic sick time upon attainment of 840 hours of regular PTO. Catastrophic sick time accrues in a separate account at the rate of 3.08 hours per pay period (one-half the minimum PTO accrual rate of 6.16 hours per pay period) for each pay period that an employee maintains a balance of 840 hours and does not use PTO in said pay period. In the event of catastrophic illness or injury, an employee may use time available in their catastrophic sick bank for the employee or an immediate family member as defined in the sick leave policy after exhausting all PTO hours down to fifteen (15) days prorated based upon FTE status and all ESLB hours. Catastrophic sick time is not compensable upon separation of employment in good standing or otherwise.

MN DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE

ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL GROUP I

MN DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE


CD3 GENERAL BENEFIT CORPORATION

CXL WARRANT #1 ERROR S/B ACH

BAIT FOR RESALE @ SCHROEDER

ACCT 223335311 LEC MAY UNIFORM

ACCT 223335300 GC MAY UNIFORM

ACCT 220001527 RAGS/RUGS SHOP

Account NumberWarrant # Vendor Name

Warrant Date Amount Description Invoice Number 1099 Acc

1:51:08PMWSM7580

Copyright 2010-2021 Integrated Financial Systems

1 3392

84-000-000-0000-682006/15/2022 30,650.36 MNDRIVE N

84-000-000-0000-682006/15/2022 30,650.36 N

274068 ALBION ACRES BAIT 3858

01-521-788-0304-680706/13/2022 99.10 1707 Y

274069 ALL STATE COMMUNICATIONS INC 1168

01-031-000-0000-641106/13/2022 4,400.00 600 PROXI CARDS TO ADMIN 326130 N

274070 ANGUS SYSTEMS GROUP INC 4947

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 910.41 WORK ORDERS JUNE 2022 INV766063 N

274071 1637

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 102.40 ACCT 223335311 LEC 5/17 UNIFOR253006325 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 112.56 ACCT 223335300 GC 5/24 UNIFOR 2530008879 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 109.42 ACCT 223335300 GC 5/17 UNIFOR 2530006320 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 91.18 2530011931 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 652.67 ACCT 223335300 GC 5/10 UNIFOR 253000137425 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 102.40 ACCT 223335311 LEC 5/10 UNIFOR253000137429 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 102.40 ACCT 223335311 LEC 5/14 UNIFOR2530008885 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 112.56 2530011927 N

01-521-699-0360-626106/13/2022 71.52 2530011914 N

274072 BECKER TOWERS LLC 6144

03-326-000-0000-650806/13/2022 4,000.00 CP 037-171 TEMP EASEMENT 1

03-326-000-0000-660606/13/2022 23,000.00 CP 037-171 PERM EASEMENT S

274073 BROCK WHITE CO LLC 408

03-340-000-0000-657406/13/2022 188.81 MAINT KIT CRAFCO 15364877 N

03-340-000-0000-657406/13/2022 160.98 MAINT KIT CRAFCO 15475299 N

274074 537

02-529-000-0000-685906/13/2022 1,025.00 CD3 ANNUAL SOFTWARE FEES 373893-34-184 N

1 0.00 3392

274068 ALBION ACRES BAIT 99.10 3858

274069 ALL STATE COMMUNICATIONS INC 4,400.00 1168

274070 ANGUS SYSTEMS GROUP INC 910.41 4947

274071 1,457.11 1637

274072 BECKER TOWERS LLC 27,000.00 6144

274073 BROCK WHITE CO LLC 349.79 408

*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***Page 2

Rpt

-

6/21/2022DISBURSEMENTS BY WARRANT NUMBER REPORT

CD3 GENERAL BENEFIT CORPORATION

COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION

COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION

11713394-2 GAS SCHROEDER MNGR

ANNANDALE SHOP BOTTLED WATER

MAPLE LAKE SHOP BOTTLED WATER



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274075 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 5974

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 5,958.43 5871994 9 GAS GC 4/14-5/12/22 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 65.99 5811649 2 GAS SHER 4/14-5/12 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 243.97 5767681 9 GAS CTY 4/14-5/12/22 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 3,150.52 7915763 2 GAS LEC 4/14-5/12/22 N

01-521-788-0360-625106/13/2022 47.49 11713394-2 N


01-099-493-8433-602006/13/2022 352.43 ARP ACCT 9626236-5 A BERNARD N

274077 1663

03-320-000-0000-633806/13/2022 75.00 MNDOT ADA CONST CERT SARA BUERMAN N

274078 COTTENS INC 438

03-340-000-0000-657106/13/2022 100.79 HWY BATTERY 826363 N

03-340-000-0000-657406/13/2022 10.41 HWY REPAIR PART 826043 N

03-340-000-0000-657406/13/2022 32.37 HWY REPAIR PART 826172 N

03-340-000-0000-657406/13/2022 55.79 HWY REPAIR PART 826727 N

03-340-000-0000-657406/13/2022 17.99 HWY REPAIR PART 826123 N

03-340-000-0000-657406/13/2022 17.99 HWY REPAIR PART 826124 N

03-340-000-0000-657406/13/2022 36.12 HWY REPAIR PART 826342 N

274079 COTTENS INC BUFFALO 416

01-521-652-0390-645206/13/2022 5.65 29430 OIL FILTER STOCK 231-823476 N

274080 CULLIGAN OF BUFFALO 1118

01-111-000-0000-641106/13/2022 68.40 OTSEGO SHOP SOLAR SALT 173X03023407 N

01-111-000-0000-641106/13/2022 93.75 173X03019108 N

01-111-000-0000-641106/13/2022 41.85 COKATO SHOP SOLAR SALT 173X03031004 N

01-111-000-0000-641106/13/2022 45.55 173X03021807 N

274081 DIAMOND MOWERS INC 3331

03-340-000-0000-657406/13/2022 859.58 HWY REPAIR PARTS 0219496 N


274074 1,025.00 537

274075 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 9,466.40 5974

274076 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 352.43 5974

274077 75.00 1663

274078 COTTENS INC 271.46 438

274079 COTTENS INC BUFFALO 5.65 416

274080 CULLIGAN OF BUFFALO 249.55 1118


Rpt


FULLER CONCRETE & MASONRY INC

GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

HERALD JOURNAL PUBLISHING INC

JUNCTION TOWING & AUTO REPAIR

KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION - NORTH CENTRAL

FULLER CONCRETE & MASONRY INC

GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY


KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION - NORTH CENTRAL

OTSEGO SALT SHED IMPROVEMENTS

MAY PUBLIC HEARING PUBLI. FEE



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274082 6142

03-326-000-0000-650806/13/2022 3,700.00 CP 037-211 DAMAGES 1913 N

274083 GALLS LLC 369

01-201-000-0000-641106/13/2022 297.00 SAFETY VEST X10 021173278 Y

274084 5996

03-340-000-0000-661506/13/2022 24,900.00 29385 N

274085 HERALD JOURNAL PUBLISHING INC 4817

01-103-000-0000-623506/13/2022 8.25 NOTICE OF INTERIM ZONING EM 06032022 N

01-041-071-0000-623506/13/2022 64.02 NOTICE GENERAL ELECTION 05312022 N

01-041-000-0000-623506/13/2022 270.63 BOARD MINUTES 04/19/2022 05312022 N

01-041-000-0000-623506/13/2022 149.38 BOARD MINUTES 04/26/2022 05312022 N

01-107-000-0000-623506/13/2022 84.17 N

03-310-000-0000-623506/13/2022 41.46 BID ADV CONTRACT 2204 5/31/2022 N

274086 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 2001

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 147.27 TOWEL DISPENSER 604759202 N

274087 J.R.'S ADVANCED RECYCLERS 1054

20-393-000-0000-684106/13/2022 635.00 APPLIANCE RECYCLING 107295 N

274088 1628

01-201-000-0000-626106/13/2022 190.00 CASE #22013282 18 FORD F-250 53850 N

274089 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED 838

01-100-000-0000-626106/13/2022 3,362.92 PERA APPEAL (TM) 167989 N

274090 512

01-521-799-0380-660506/13/2022 458.36 338371 CLASS 2 BERTRAM 936228 N

274081 DIAMOND MOWERS INC 1,188.48 3331

274082 3,700.00 6142

274083 GALLS LLC 297.00 369

274084 24,900.00 5996

274085 617.91 4817

274086 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 147.27 2001

274087 J.R.'S ADVANCED RECYCLERS 635.00 1054

274088 190.00 1628

274089 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED 3,362.92 838

274090 458.36 512


Rpt


LABOR RELATIONS INFORMATION SYSTEMS

LABOR RELATIONS INFORMATION SYSTEMS

ELECTONICS TV BATTERIES PICKUP

AA7P011000825 COPY MACHINE LEA

AA7R011016644 KONICA C450I SUR



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274091 KONRAD MATERIAL SALES LLC 3583

03-330-000-0000-655706/13/2022 999.20 UPM ASPHALT BAGS 1254870 N

274092 1693

01-201-000-0000-623506/13/2022 150.00 2022 LRIS SUBCRIPT RENEWAL 36786 Y

274093 LAKE STATE RECYCLING, INC. 5202

20-393-000-0000-684106/13/2022 1,788.05 52483 N

274094 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 1946

01-031-000-0000-623506/13/2022 94.00 JOB POSTING ELECTIONS MNGR 363966 N

274095 LUDENIA LANDSCAPING 3574

03-330-000-0000-654006/13/2022 1,550.00 CONBIT - CR 7 100 YARDS 1057 N

274096 MARCO 1344

01-101-000-0000-623306/13/2022 287.60 A7PY017010370 OVERAGE INV10008487 N

274097 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 4364

01-005-000-0000-634306/13/2022 135.98 AA2K011006754 05/22-06/22/22 473632008 N

01-063-000-0000-634306/13/2022 215.68 AA2J011006485 05/22-06/22/22 473632149 N


01-107-000-0000-634306/13/2022 571.68 473632321 N


01-103-000-0000-634306/13/2022 293.96 473915718 N


01-091-000-0000-634306/13/2022 828.23 500-0622989-000 05/20-06/20 473442648 N

274101 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 1706

274091 KONRAD MATERIAL SALES LLC 999.20 3583

274092 150.00 1693

274093 LAKE STATE RECYCLING, INC. 1,788.05 5202

274094 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 94.00 1946

274095 LUDENIA LANDSCAPING 1,550.00 3574

274096 MARCO 287.60 1344

274097 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 351.66 4364





Rpt


MASTERS PLUMBING HEATING & COOLING

MASTERS PLUMBING HEATING & COOLING

SWPPP MNTR OTSEGO STRBK RESTOR

APR/MAY 2022 TRANSCRIBE STATEM



1:51:08PMWSM7580


03-330-000-0000-653506/13/2022 335.78 RIP RAP FOR STOCK 35537619 N

274102 5423

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 942.70 MOVE MANIFOLD 5714 N

274103 METRO LEGAL SERVICES INC 45637

01-091-000-0000-626106/13/2022 25.00 SERVICES FEE 3377218 N

01-091-000-0000-626106/13/2022 50.00 SERVICES FEE 3377350 N

01-091-000-0000-626106/13/2022 140.00 SERVICES FEE 3376877 N

01-091-000-0000-626106/13/2022 125.00 SERVICES FEE 3375488 N

274104 MN ASSOCIATION OF TOWNSHIPS 7394

01-091-000-0000-623506/13/2022 15.00 SUBSCRIPTION S100862 N

03-310-000-0000-623506/13/2022 15.00 SUBSCRIPTION FOR HWY DEPT S100863 N

274105 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 2585

03-320-000-0000-650506/13/2022 702.44 SAP 086-603-024 COUNTY COSTS 691855 N

274106 MN NATIVE LANDSCAPES 1678

34-150-521-8097-626106/13/2022 1,925.00 34128 Y

274107 MSB EXCAVATING & TILING LLC 3017

41-676-000-0000-626106/13/2022 1,467.95 CD 30 REPAIRS 12-22 N

274108 MULLER/MICHELE 6101

01-013-000-0000-627006/13/2022 220.00 PR 09 5275 CONTRACT MAY 22 Y

274109 NET TRANSCRIPTS INC 3844

01-201-000-0000-626106/13/2022 698.49 NT10792 N

274110 NEXTERA HOLDINGS LLC 2904

03-310-000-0000-620306/13/2022 102.50 INTERNET SHOP #2 118642 Y

274101 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 335.78 1706

274102 942.70 5423

274103 METRO LEGAL SERVICES INC 340.00 45637

274104 MN ASSOCIATION OF TOWNSHIPS 30.00 7394

274105 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 702.44 2585

274106 MN NATIVE LANDSCAPES 1,925.00 1678

274107 MSB EXCAVATING & TILING LLC 1,467.95 3017

274108 MULLER/MICHELE 220.00 6101

274109 NET TRANSCRIPTS INC 698.49 3844

274110 NEXTERA HOLDINGS LLC 102.50 2904


Rpt


BITUMINOUS FOR PWB SITE IMPROV

BIT SPOT TREATMENT ON CSAH 30

TOW 22013688 EVWW662 12 HYUNDI

CASE #22012856 17 FORDEXPLORER

TRANSPORT FEES RECYCLABLES

2022-23 EXPECTATIONS RENEWALX2

PETERSON'S TOWING & RECOVERY

SENTRY SECURITY FASTENERS INC


SENTRY SECURITY FASTENERS INC



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274111 OMANN BROTHERS INC 7406

03-330-000-0000-653106/13/2022 1,446.80 15945 N

03-330-000-0000-653106/13/2022 4,488.52 15915 N

274112 PERRY'S TRUCK REPAIR 5177

01-201-000-0000-626106/13/2022 938.00 18386 Y

274113 2615

01-201-000-0000-626106/13/2022 158.00 6086 Y

274114 POKORNOWSKI TRUCKING LLC 5277

20-393-000-0000-684106/13/2022 315.00 6019 Y

274115 REPUBLIC SERVICES 891 5611

01-091-000-0000-626106/13/2022 61.40 2022-05 SHREDDING 0894-005758869 N

01-201-000-0000-626106/13/2022 977.79 EVIDENCE DUMPSTER 051322 0894-005726635 N

274116 3261

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 1,803.40 JAIL 24 LOCK 82599 N

274117 SMART HORIZONS 3198

02-226-000-0000-626106/13/2022 456.00 15-052286 N

274118 SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS 3707

03-330-000-0000-654006/13/2022 294.64 DITCH MIX CR 113 151548 N

03-330-000-0000-654006/13/2022 455.04 NUSTRAW 36 BALES INVENTORY 151548 N

03-330-000-0000-654006/13/2022 226.79 PROF LANDSCAPE CSAH 8 151548 N

274119 SPRINT 3986

01-201-000-0000-620406/13/2022 107.22 MAY 2022 SPRINT DATA CARDS 271188815-174 N

274120 STREICHERS 1436

01-201-000-0000-641106/13/2022 61.99 VEST COOLER KIT X1 I1567882 N

274111 OMANN BROTHERS INC 5,935.32 7406

274112 PERRY'S TRUCK REPAIR 938.00 5177

274113 158.00 2615

274114 POKORNOWSKI TRUCKING LLC 315.00 5277

274115 REPUBLIC SERVICES 891 1,039.19 5611

274116 1,803.40 3261

274117 SMART HORIZONS 456.00 3198

274118 SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS 976.47 3707

274119 SPRINT 107.22 3986


Rpt


PVMT MARKINGS CONT 2203 PYMT 1

PVMT MARKINGS CONT 2203 PYMT 2



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274121 T MOBILE USA INC 2707

01-063-000-0000-648006/13/2022 2,766.24 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

03-310-000-0000-620306/13/2022 21.15 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-521-687-0300-620306/13/2022 132.75 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-521-687-0300-620306/13/2022 132.75 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-031-033-0000-620306/13/2022 88.50 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-031-033-0000-620306/13/2022 88.50 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-121-000-0000-620306/13/2022 44.25 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-121-000-0000-620306/13/2022 44.25 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-107-000-0000-620306/13/2022 240.00 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-107-000-0000-620306/13/2022 240.00 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-201-000-0000-620306/13/2022 52.95 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-201-000-0000-620306/13/2022 44.25 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-105-000-0000-620306/13/2022 163.25 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-105-000-0000-620306/13/2022 163.25 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-063-000-0000-620306/13/2022 282.58 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-063-000-0000-620306/13/2022 282.58 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-111-000-0000-620306/13/2022 611.04 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-111-000-0000-620306/13/2022 611.04 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-041-000-0000-620306/13/2022 35.75 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-005-000-0000-620306/13/2022 66.50 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-005-000-0000-620306/13/2022 71.50 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-031-000-0000-620306/13/2022 35.75 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

01-031-000-0000-620306/13/2022 58.00 ACCT 972067288 4/21-05/20 N

01-041-000-0000-620306/13/2022 25.54 ACCT 972067288 3/21-04/20 N

274122 TRAFFIC MARKING SERVICE INC 6966

03-350-000-0000-653206/13/2022 220,829.82 12319 N

03-350-000-0000-653206/13/2022 37,508.47 12320 N

274123 TRANSLANGUAGES LLC 99

01-201-000-0000-626106/13/2022 600.00 INTRPTING SVCS ICR #22-0101805220505 N

274124 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2490

01-201-000-0000-620506/13/2022 36.00 UPS WEEKLY CHARGE 051422 00R6172Y202 N

274120 STREICHERS 61.99 1436

274121 T MOBILE USA INC 636.89 2707

274122 TRAFFIC MARKING SERVICE INC 258,338.29 6966

274123 TRANSLANGUAGES LLC 600.00 99

274124 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 36.00 2490


Rpt

-

-


24 75762 83003 OTSEGO COUNTY P

24 75715 63005 CLEARWATER PLEA

FIREWOOD FOR RESALE COLLINWOOD

FIREWOOD FOR RESALE BERTRAM

FIREWOOD FOR RESALE SCHROEDER

ARP ACCT 51-0010866313-5 BERNA



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274125 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES LLC 4628

01-201-000-0000-620306/13/2022 12.29 MAY 2022 VERIZON 780564637 9906984626 N

274126 VONCO II, LLC 3878

03-330-000-0000-685906/13/2022 562.58 STREET SWEEPING 2022 67881 N

274127 WM CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. 3741

01-521-780-0353-630106/13/2022 68.90 24 75766 33000 MONTISSIPPI 7654929-1593-7 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 1,035.64 20 83417 33005 LEC 2022-05 7652826-1593-7 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 386.66 20 83393 23005 GC ANX 2022-05 7652825-1593-9 N

01-521-783-0353-630106/13/2022 62.15 7654927-1593-1 N

01-521-773-0353-630106/13/2022 25.28 24 75758 83009 FAIRHAVEN 7654925-1593-5 N

01-521-787-0353-630106/13/2022 9.48 24 75789 13007 RIVERSIDE 7654932-1593-1 N

01-521-799-0353-630106/13/2022 402.71 24 75712 43003 BERTRAM CHAIN 7654920-1593-6 N

01-521-788-0353-630106/13/2022 115.29 24 75806 43000 SCHROEDER 7654934-1593-7 N

01-521-766-0353-630106/13/2022 27.30 7654921-1593-4 N

01-521-771-0353-630106/13/2022 36.28 26 36602 33005 DUSTIN WAYSIDE 7655462-1593-8 N

01-521-768-0353-630106/13/2022 71.38 24 75726 23001 COLLINWOOD 7654922-1593-2 N

01-521-786-0353-630106/13/2022 126.40 26 36804 53006 NEY PARK 7655465-1593-1 N

274128 WOODCHUCKERS FIREWOOD 3667

01-521-768-0304-680706/13/2022 1,466.66 1996 Y

01-521-799-0304-680706/13/2022 1,466.67 1996 Y

01-521-788-0304-680706/13/2022 1,466.67 1996 Y

274129 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 1535

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 27.95 150 1697 2541 GC FIRE PANEL MO15016972541 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 27.95 150 1695 4544 TRNG CTR FIRE PA 15016954544 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 27.95 150 1695 4770 JC THRU 6/30 15016954770 N

274130 XCEL ENERGY 4433

01-099-493-8433-602006/13/2022 1,656.09 778667915 N

274131 ABSHIRE / DUANE 999999998

84-000-000-0000-501506/15/2022 14.97 CAMPING REFUND - TAX 14176 N

274125 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES LLC 12.29 4628

274126 VONCO II, LLC 562.58 3878

274127 WM CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. 2,367.47 3741

274128 WOODCHUCKERS FIREWOOD 4,400.00 3667

274129 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 83.85 1535

274130 XCEL ENERGY 1,656.09 4433


Rpt


WITHDRAW BOA PERMIT PR20220004



1:51:08PMWSM7580


01-521-000-0000-583006/15/2022 188.03 CAMPING REFUND 14176 N

274132 AGAPE ACRES LLC 999999998

01-107-000-0000-550106/15/2022 400.00 N

274133 ARAMARK SERVICES INC 6158

01-250-000-0000-645906/15/2022 7,856.52 INMATE MEALS 052622-060122 200723300-766 N

01-250-000-0000-645906/15/2022 7,851.60 INMATE MEALS 051222-051822 200723300-762 N

01-250-000-0000-645906/15/2022 7,890.91 INMATE MEALS 051922-052522 200723300-764 N

01-250-000-0000-645906/15/2022 8,104.04 INMATE MEALS 012022-012622 200723300-733 N

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 70.00 FRESH FAVES 022722 200723300-743 N

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 228.00 FRESH FAVES 053122 200723300-765 N

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 288.00 FRESH FAVES 012022 200723300-732 N

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 120.00 FRESH FAVES 052422 200723300-763 N

274134 COMM OF MMB, TREAS DIV 6401

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 28,539.00 RE SURCHARGE MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 3,685.00 ML SURCHARGE MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 114.00 RE ASSURANCE MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 170.00 PREMARITAL ED MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 2,268.00 BIRTH/DEATH MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 252.00 ML VISITATION MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 1,675.00 ML DISP HOME MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 2,700.00 BIRTH ADD MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 168.00 ML ENABLE MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 335.00 ML DISP HOME MAY 2022 N

84-000-000-0000-690206/15/2022 810.00 CHILDRENS SURCHARGE MAY 2022 N

274135 COOKS CORRECTIONAL 3140

01-250-000-0000-645906/15/2022 234.91 KITCHEN SUPPLIES N729147 N

274136 CORRECTION DENTISTRY LLC 5792

01-250-000-0000-645806/15/2022 984.00 DENTISTRY SERVICE 031822 (JS) 1901 N

274137 FRANZ REPROGRAPHICS 2644

274131 ABSHIRE / DUANE 203.00 999999998

274132 AGAPE ACRES LLC 400.00 999999998

274133 ARAMARK SERVICES INC 32,409.07 6158

274134 COMM OF MMB, TREAS DIV 40,716.00 6401

274135 COOKS CORRECTIONAL 234.91 3140

274136 CORRECTION DENTISTRY LLC 984.00 5792


Rpt


INK CARTRIDGES HP T2600 PLOTTE

IMAZAPYR/DYNE AMIC CHEMICAL OR

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MILEAGE

2022 BODY SCANNER EVALUATION


GERTEN GREENHOUSES & GARDEN CENTER INC

HIGHWOODS TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOC

MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY

GERTEN GREENHOUSES & GARDEN CENTER INC

HIGHWOODS TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOC



1:51:08PMWSM7580


01-103-000-0000-641106/15/2022 520.75 242192-0 N

274138 661

01-521-000-0000-655006/15/2022 988.13 158638/12 N

274139 999999998

01-201-000-0000-685806/15/2022 5,813.00 CP202200871 FORECLOSURE 202202862 N

274140 JONES/JOHN 3887

01-107-000-0000-611406/15/2022 91.26 2022-2ND QTR N

01-107-000-0000-611406/15/2022 600.00 5 BOA MEETINGS PER DIEM 2022-2ND QTR Y

274141 LOTUS PHARMACY 2914

01-250-000-0000-645806/15/2022 4,015.51 MAY 2022 INMATE MEDICATIONS FAC100-062222H 6

01-250-000-0000-645806/15/2022 91.56 MAY 2022 STOCK MEDS FW100-060222H 6

274142 MIDWEST MEDICAL PHYSICS LLP 4647

01-250-000-0000-626106/15/2022 1,250.00 21148 N

274143 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 3088

01-521-000-0000-623506/15/2022 2,175.00 LARGE FORMAT PARK MAPS 500 SOI-104368 N

274144 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 343

02-392-000-0000-670406/15/2022 27,150.98 SRF 0309 5 N

02-392-000-0000-670406/15/2022 19,910.13 SRF 0246 15 N

02-392-000-0000-670406/15/2022 18,312.82 SRF 0264 11 N

274145 NEUMANN/ROBERT 2952


01-107-000-0000-611406/15/2022 74.88 2022-2ND QTR N

274146 NIX / SHAYNA 999999998

01-521-000-0000-583006/15/2022 314.00 CAMPING REFUND 14106 N


274137 FRANZ REPROGRAPHICS 520.75 2644

274138 988.13 661

274139 5,813.00 999999998

274140 JONES/JOHN 691.26 3887

274141 LOTUS PHARMACY 4,107.07 2914

274142 MIDWEST MEDICAL PHYSICS LLP 1,250.00 4647

274143 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 2,175.00 3088

274144 65,373.93 343

274145 NEUMANN/ROBERT 554.88 2952


Rpt


NORTH STAR AWARDS & TROPHIES

SMART CARE EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS

TOWNHOMES OF STONEGATE ESTATES

NORTH STAR AWARDS & TROPHIES

SMART CARE EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS

TOWNHOMES OF STONEGATE ESTATES



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274147 626

01-250-000-0000-626106/15/2022 64.95 RETIREMENT AWARD (SM) 11124 N

274148 PAKOR INC 6002

01-041-000-0000-641006/15/2022 809.85 PASSPORT PHOTO PAPER 645171 N

274149 POLINGO / LYNDA 999999998

01-521-000-0000-583006/15/2022 26.86 CAMPING REFUND 14531 N


274150 RINKE-NOONAN 1004

01-041-000-0000-626106/15/2022 200.00 MAY 2022 RETAINER LEGAL FEES343294 N

274151 5216

01-250-000-0000-645906/15/2022 62.50 CONVECTION OVEN PART 10340545 N

274152 999999998

01-201-000-0000-685806/15/2022 6,380.90 CP202200870 FORECLOSURE 202202860 N


01-025-000-0000-620506/15/2022 2.11 5552E3232 SHIPPING CHARGE N














274146 NIX / SHAYNA 339.00 999999998

274147 64.95 626

274148 PAKOR INC 809.85 6002

274149 POLINGO / LYNDA 29.00 999999998

274150 RINKE-NOONAN 200.00 1004

274151 62.50 5216

274152 6,380.90 999999998


Rpt



CLOTHING EVA SANDAL ORANGE X48

CLOTHING T SHIRTS ORANGE X288

86-CR-20-2324 REFUND OVERPYMT



1:51:08PMWSM7580





274154 VICK/DAN 5049

01-107-000-0000-611406/15/2022 105.30 2022-2ND QTR N


274155 VICTORY SUPPLY LLC 1279

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 253.80 CLOTHING PANTS GREEN X432 0065331 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 680.00 BATHTOWELS WHITE X600 0065589 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 528.00 CLOTHING BOXERS X288 0065287 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 691.05 CLOTHING SPORTS BRAS X288 0065331 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 57.60 INDIGENT SOAP X1000 0065345 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 163.20 0065331 N

01-250-000-0000-648006/15/2022 1,106.00 HANDCUFFS X40 0065116 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 726.00 BLANKET GREY X120 0065331 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 167.40 PILLOWCASES BROWN X120 0065589 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 725.00 HAND TOWELS WHITE X1200 0065589 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 397.53 SHEETS BROWN BEDDING X84 0065701 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 1,303.20 0065227 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 365.00 WASHCLOTHS WHITE X1200 0065589 N

274156 WEDEL HOME SERVICES INC 999999998

01-201-000-0000-685806/15/2022 28,999.00 CP202200871 FORECLOSURE 202202863 N

274157 WIESE / JOHNATHAN 999999998

01-025-000-0000-550106/15/2022 10.00 86-CR-20-2324 N

274158 WILLIAMS / GAYLE 999999998

01-521-000-0000-583006/15/2022 134.31 CAMPING REFUND 14470 N


274159 WORTMAN/SANDRA 6148

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 235.00 SERVICES HAIRCUTS MAY 2022 06062022 Y


274154 VICK/DAN 705.30 5049

274155 VICTORY SUPPLY LLC 7,163.78 1279

274156 WEDEL HOME SERVICES INC 28,999.00 999999998

274157 WIESE / JOHNATHAN 10.00 999999998

274158 WILLIAMS / GAYLE 145.00 999999998


Rpt


CENTRAL LAND TITLE GUARANTEE CO

CORELOGIC CENTRALIZED REFUNDS


CENTRAL LAND TITLE GUARANTEE CO



SP 619-035 PARCEL 11 GUTZWILLE



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274160 1469

03-326-000-0000-660606/15/2022 283,874.79 N

274161 ERICKSON/KENNETH 6164

01-099-493-8433-602006/15/2022 1,700.00 ARP - RENT A BERNARD Y

274162 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 1,904.00 114 084 002020 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 2,247.00 114 357 001040 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 20.00 114 381 003010 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 202.00 210 000 144100 JET 5/27/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 885.00 118 328 007321 JET 5/10/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 90.00 103 123 003310 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 90.00 103 123 003340 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 775.00 220 000 252400 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 10.00 114 381 001040 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 685.00 118 331 003100 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 84.00 155 261 001100 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 79.00 215 100 241100 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 2,656.00 217 000 294200 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 243.00 218 000 011201 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 2.00 103 145 001022 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 247.00 104 038 005090 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 1,979.00 210 100 361200 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 951.00 205 000 281401 JET 5/11/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 909.00 202 000 352300 JET 5/11/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 436.00 211 000 232101 JET 6/7/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 77.00 118 345 003030 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 455.00 118 349 0010 JET 5/5/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 404.00 114 500 323201 JET 5/11/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 1,563.00 205 000 023100 JET 5/11/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 90.00 103 123 003300 JET 5/5/2022 N

274163 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 1,971.00 220 000 061100 JET 5/5/2022 N

274159 WORTMAN/SANDRA 235.00 6148

274160 283,874.79 1469

274161 ERICKSON/KENNETH 1,700.00 6164

274162 17,083.00 999999998

274163 1,971.00 999999998


Rpt


THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274164 GREGA/BRUCE 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 11.00 209 018 000110 LMM 6/6/2022 N

274165 HOMETOWN BANK 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 7,476.00 109 800 334101 JET 5/10/2022 N

274166 KITTOCK/KEITH 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 1,133.00 211 000 334201 JET 5/13/2022 N

274167 LERETA 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 372.00 118 312 008010 JET 4/28/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 304.00 118 190 006070 JET 4/28/2022 N

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 6.00 202 000 324403 JET 4/28/2022 N

274168 LIBERTY BANK 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 92.00 204 100 034401 JET 5/9/2022 N

274169 SANDS PROPERTIES 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 35.49 204 100 124201 JET 5/6/2022 N

274170 SHRODE/JACOB 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 2,649.00 118 337 005020 JET 3/14/2022 N

274171 THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 198.61 118 239 001010 JET 5/12/2022 N

274172 TOPLINE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 20.00 118 205 005090 JET 5/6/2022 N

274173 ZACHMAN/DOUGLAS OR GAEL 999999998

85-830-000-0000-688206/15/2022 86.00 114 800 084400 JET 5/172022 N

274164 GREGA/BRUCE 11.00 999999998

274165 HOMETOWN BANK 7,476.00 999999998

274166 KITTOCK/KEITH 1,133.00 999999998

274167 LERETA 682.00 999999998

274168 LIBERTY BANK 92.00 999999998

274169 SANDS PROPERTIES 35.49 999999998

274170 SHRODE/JACOB 2,649.00 999999998

274171 198.61 999999998

274172 TOPLINE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 20.00 999999998

274173 ZACHMAN/DOUGLAS OR GAEL 86.00 999999998


Rpt


AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE

AMERITAS VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO


AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE

AMERITAS VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO


CARLSON CHAPTER 13 BANKRUPTCY OFFICE



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274174 035201 NCPERS MINNESOTA 7057

01-000-000-0000-223706/17/2022 1,184.00 LIFE N

72-605-000-0000-223706/17/2022 48.00 LIFE N

71-505-000-0000-223706/17/2022 16.00 LIFE N

03-000-000-0000-223706/17/2022 80.00 LIFE N

11-420-000-0000-223706/17/2022 96.64 LIFE N

11-430-000-0000-223706/17/2022 304.00 LIFE N

11-450-000-0000-223706/17/2022 48.00 LIFE N

02-021-000-0000-223706/17/2022 16.00 LIFE N

11-480-000-0000-223706/17/2022 79.36 LIFE N

274175 AFSCME LOCAL 2685 2232

01-000-000-0000-223806/17/2022 29.33 UNION N

11-420-000-0000-223806/17/2022 855.18 UNION N

11-430-000-0000-223806/17/2022 1,920.88 UNION N

11-450-000-0000-223806/17/2022 820.22 UNION N

11-480-000-0000-223806/17/2022 290.97 UNION N

274176 742

01-000-000-0000-223706/17/2022 600.63 INSURANCE N

03-000-000-0000-223706/17/2022 79.20 LIFE INSURANCE N

11-420-000-0000-223706/17/2022 43.99 INSURANCE N

11-430-000-0000-223706/17/2022 198.49 INSURANCE N

11-480-000-0000-223706/17/2022 40.77 INSURANCE N

274177 7058

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 125.00 DEFERRED COMP N

11-430-000-0000-223206/17/2022 600.00 DEFERRED COMP N

274178 1637

01-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 34.00 ACCT 223372811 CLOTHING ACCT 223372811 N

03-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 181.28 ACCT 223372811 CLOTHING ACCT 223372811 N

274179 4881

11-420-000-0000-223906/17/2022 70.00 GARNISHMENT N

274174 035201 NCPERS MINNESOTA 1,872.00 7057

274175 AFSCME LOCAL 2685 3,857.92 2232

274176 963.08 742

274177 725.00 7058

274178 215.28 1637


Rpt

-


CARLSON CHAPTER 13 BANKRUPTCY OFFICE

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENG LOC

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENG LOC



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274180 HARTFORD 1886

01-000-000-0000-223706/17/2022 8,286.90 DISABILITY INSUARNCE N

01-000-000-0000-223706/17/2022 8,298.10 LIFE INSURANCE N

72-605-000-0000-223706/17/2022 170.40 LIFE INSURANCE N

72-605-000-0000-223706/17/2022 183.55 DISABILITY INSURANCE N

11-450-000-0000-223706/17/2022 444.32 LIFE INSURANCE N

02-021-000-0000-223706/17/2022 8.02 DISABILITY INSUARNCE N

02-021-000-0000-223706/17/2022 18.80 LIFE INSURANCE N

11-480-000-0000-223706/17/2022 789.22 LIFE INSURANCE N


11-420-000-0000-223706/17/2022 669.77 LIFE INSURANCE N

11-430-000-0000-223706/17/2022 1,557.30 LIFE INSURANCE N

11-430-000-0000-223706/17/2022 1,714.67 DISABILITY INSURANCE N



03-000-000-0000-223706/17/2022 961.58 LIFE INSURANCE N



274181 HEALTH PARTNERS 2494

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 29,106.50 HEALTH INSURANCE N

01-000-000-0000-223706/17/2022 114.08 HEALTH AFTER TAX N

71-505-000-0000-223206/17/2022 587.87 HEALTH INSURANCE N


72-605-000-0000-223206/17/2022 782.06 HEALTH INSURANCE N





274182 1922

01-000-000-0000-223806/17/2022 350.00 UNION DUES N

03-000-000-0000-223806/17/2022 910.00 UNION DUES N

274183 LOCAL 320 1921

274179 70.00 4881

274180 HARTFORD 25,340.30 1886

274181 HEALTH PARTNERS 47,641.82 2494

274182 1,260.00 1922


Rpt


MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER

NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS

MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER

NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS



1:51:08PMWSM7580


01-000-000-0000-223806/17/2022 3,952.00 UNION DUES CLERICAL N

02-021-000-0000-223806/17/2022 53.00 UNION DUES CLERICAL N

03-000-000-0000-223806/17/2022 53.00 UNION DUES N

274184 MG TRUST COMPANY 1919

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 2,050.00 DEFERRED COMP N

01-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 1,000.00 ROTH N

03-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 75.00 DEFERRED COMP N

03-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 25.00 ROTH N

11-430-000-0000-223206/17/2022 630.00 DEFERRED COMP N

274185 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION 1558

01-000-000-0000-223706/17/2022 787.26 LIFE INSURANCE N

11-420-000-0000-223706/17/2022 808.68 LIFE INSURANCE N

11-430-000-0000-223706/17/2022 741.28 LIFE INSURANCE N

11-450-000-0000-223706/17/2022 4.34 LIFE INSURANCE N

274186 7060

01-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 2,160.50 CHILD SUPPORT N

03-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 750.50 CHILD SUPPORT N

11-430-000-0000-223906/17/2022 317.00 CHILD SUPPORT N

274187 7059

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 1,772.00 DEFERRED COMP N

01-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 1,130.00 ROTH N

11-430-000-0000-223206/17/2022 310.00 DEFERRED COMP N

11-430-000-0000-223906/17/2022 200.00 ROTH N

11-420-000-0000-223206/17/2022 250.00 DEFERRED COMP N

03-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 820.30 DEFERRED COMP N

274188 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSN 1285

01-000-000-0000-223606/17/2022 126,030.97 PERA W/H EMPLOYEE N

01-000-000-0000-223606/17/2022 332.94 DEFINED PERA CO SHARE N

01-000-000-0000-223606/17/2022 170,909.53 PERA CO SHARE N

01-000-000-0000-223606/17/2022 332.94 DEFINED PERA W/H EMPLOYEE N

02-021-000-0000-223606/17/2022 205.82 PERA CO SHARE N

274183 LOCAL 320 4,058.00 1921

274184 MG TRUST COMPANY 3,780.00 1919

274185 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION 2,341.56 1558

274186 3,228.00 7060

274187 4,482.30 7059


Rpt


STEWART, ZLIMEN & JUNGERS LTD.

PARAMARK REAL ESTATE SERVICES

STEWART, ZLIMEN & JUNGERS LTD.

PARAMARK REAL ESTATE SERVICES

HHS POSTAGE DUE ACCT# 236165



1:51:08PMWSM7580


02-021-000-0000-223606/17/2022 178.37 PERA W/H EMPLOYEE N

11-480-000-0000-223606/17/2022 4,428.15 PERA CO SHARE N


11-420-000-0000-223606/17/2022 8,584.73 PERA CO SHARE N

11-420-000-0000-223606/17/2022 7,440.11 PERA CO SHARE N


11-430-000-0000-223606/17/2022 23,797.44 PERA CO SHARE N


11-450-000-0000-223606/17/2022 7,967.45 PERA CO SHARE N

71-505-000-0000-223606/17/2022 539.82 PERA CO SHARE N


72-605-000-0000-223606/17/2022 1,567.20 PERA CO SHARE N


03-000-000-0000-223606/17/2022 10,646.55 PERA CO SHARE N


274189 5535

01-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 422.78 GARNISHMENT N

274190 6168

01-099-493-8433-602006/17/2022 3,510.00 ARP - RENT PRIBYL N

274191 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSN 1285

01-000-000-0000-223606/17/2022 287.80 PERA CO SHARE N


274192 ABM BUILDING VALUE 5445

01-111-000-0000-626106/17/2022 57,251.53 GC & JC JANITORIAL SVCS JUNE 17181090 N

274193 BUFFALO POSTMASTER 8769

11-480-895-0020-620506/17/2022 200.00 ACCT# 236165 N


01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 133.59 6708158 8 HWY GAS 4/26-5/25 N

274188 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSN 405,382.45 1285

274189 422.78 5535

274190 3,510.00 6168

274191 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSN 479.67 1285

274192 ABM BUILDING VALUE 57,251.53 5445

274193 BUFFALO POSTMASTER 200.00 8769

274194 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 133.59 5974


Rpt


CNH INDUSTRIAL CAPITAL PRODUCTIVITY PLUS

CNH INDUSTRIAL CAPITAL PRODUCTIVITY PLUS

CREDIT FROM TAX REFUND ON INV



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274195 CENTURYLINK 2609

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 163.78 763 682 4945 693 LEC 5/4-6/3 N


01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 678.28 763 682 2247 038 GC 5/25-6/24 N


01-201-281-0000-620306/17/2022 830.05 763 682 0210 136 6-04-22 N


01-201-000-0000-620306/17/2022 66.00 612 E60 0024 457 MAY 2022 C LI 06012022 N


02-226-000-0000-620306/17/2022 391.36 763 682 1162 914 MAY 2022 C LI 06042022 N

274200 CLIMATE AIR 5196

01-111-000-0000-630106/17/2022 6,287.85 REPAIR AT JAIL VFD AHU -1 52586 N

274201 1783

03-340-000-0000-657406/17/2022 804.80 HWY REPAIR PARTS IE19430 N

03-340-000-0000-657406/17/2022 7.30 IE19009 N

03-340-000-0000-657406/17/2022 29.00 HWY REPAIR PARTS IE19201 N

274202 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 1128

70-840-000-0000-583606/17/2022 25.00 114 800 084400 2/22/2022 N

274203 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 5657

01-025-000-0000-626506/17/2022 2,205.00 MAY 2022 JUV CORR FEES 00000703956 N

274204 DIAMOND MOWERS INC 3331

03-340-000-0000-657406/17/2022 1,063.03 HWY REPAIR PARTS 0220378 N


274195 CENTURYLINK 163.78 2609

274196 CENTURYLINK 678.28 2609

274197 CENTURYLINK 830.05 2609

274198 CENTURYLINK 66.00 2609

274199 CENTURYLINK 391.36 2609

274200 CLIMATE AIR 6,287.85 5196

274201 826.50 1783

274202 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 25.00 1128

274203 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 2,205.00 5657

274204 DIAMOND MOWERS INC 1,131.65 3331


Rpt

-


ERICKSON ENGINEERING COMPANY

HERALD JOURNAL PUBLISHING INC


ERICKSON ENGINEERING COMPANY


SAP 086-607-023 REPLACE BRIDGE

SAP 086-602-012 REPLACE BRIDGE

TOW 22014834 ENCLOSED TRAILER

PR 20220001153 REFUND FOR PERM



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274205 1959

03-326-000-0000-626106/17/2022 3,088.50 SP 086-605-026 REPLACE BRIDGE 14901 N

03-326-000-0000-626106/17/2022 1,956.50 14900 N

03-326-000-0000-626106/17/2022 19,589.25 14899 N

274206 FARM-RITE EQUIPMENT INC 1665

03-340-000-0000-657406/17/2022 116.14 HWY REPAIR PARTS P67632 N

274207 FOURTH DIMENSION SIGNS 2740

01-111-000-0000-630106/17/2022 90.00 NAME PLATE 5583 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/17/2022 1,370.00 NAME PLATE 5566 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/17/2022 454.00 NAME PLATES 5578 N

274208 HERALD JOURNAL PUBLISHING INC 4817

41-677-000-0000-626106/17/2022 11.17 PUBLICATION FOR CD 31 PH N

274209 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 2001

01-111-000-0000-641906/17/2022 1,449.54 HWY JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 604765141 N

01-111-000-0000-641906/17/2022 407.12 LEC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 604765142 N

01-111-000-0000-641906/17/2022 417.96 GC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 604768747 N

01-111-000-0000-641906/17/2022 1,733.56 LEC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 604765143 N

01-111-000-0000-641906/17/2022 3,010.51 GC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 604764240 N

01-111-000-0000-641906/17/2022 477.58 GC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 604766728 N

274210 JACKS TOWING 5212

01-201-000-0000-626106/17/2022 295.00 11010 N

274211 1628

01-201-000-0000-626106/17/2022 235.00 TOW 22014029 H & H TRAILER 53998 N

274212 KREPS EXCAVATING INC 999999998

01-107-000-0000-550106/17/2022 300.00 N

274213 LAPLANT DEMO INC 3141

274205 24,634.25 1959

274206 FARM-RITE EQUIPMENT INC 116.14 1665

274207 FOURTH DIMENSION SIGNS 1,914.00 2740

274208 11.17 4817

274209 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 7,496.27 2001

274210 JACKS TOWING 295.00 5212

274211 235.00 1628

274212 KREPS EXCAVATING INC 300.00 999999998


Rpt


MAY22 USER AGREEMENT-JS,CC,RD

MAY22-SOFTWARE SUPPORT SYSTEM

MAY22-SOFTWARE SUPPORT SYSTEM

MAY22 HHS COPY/PRINT CHARGE









BALLAST MONTISSIPPI DISC GOLD

BALLAST MONTISSIPPI DISC GOLD



1:51:08PMWSM7580


03-350-000-0000-652106/17/2022 695.85 ROADSIDE TRASH CONTAINER 57011 N

274214 LEXIS NEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS 39767

11-430-700-0010-626006/17/2022 348.00 1598141 N

11-480-895-0020-626006/17/2022 116.00 1598141 N

11-480-895-0020-626006/17/2022 115.27 1598141 N

274215 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC 6066

11-450-473-0010-623206/17/2022 71.67 4049590 N

11-420-640-0010-623206/17/2022 16.62 4049590 N

11-420-600-0010-623206/17/2022 140.63 4049590 N

11-450-475-0010-623206/17/2022 0.18 4049590 N

11-430-700-0010-623206/17/2022 201.61 4049590 N

11-450-472-0010-623206/17/2022 2.12 4049590 N

11-450-430-0010-623206/17/2022 206.37 4049590 N

11-450-485-0010-623206/17/2022 0.44 4049590 N

11-480-895-0020-623206/17/2022 191.30 4049590 N


01-201-000-0000-634306/17/2022 115.28 500-0614737-000 52122-62122 473632792 N

274217 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 1706

01-521-783-0382-655106/17/2022 132.89 CLASS 2 OTSEGO PARK 2063131 N

01-521-783-0382-655106/17/2022 144.81 CLASS 2 OTSEGO PARK 2063011 N

01-521-764-0320-655106/17/2022 174.40 CLASS 2 CROW SPRINGS 2063218 N

01-521-780-0332-655106/17/2022 208.49 2063646 N

01-521-780-0332-655106/17/2022 224.07 2063709 N

01-521-777-0352-655106/17/2022 149.33 CLASS 2 LIMESTONE LAKE 2063459 N

01-521-799-0332-655106/17/2022 169.06 CLASS 2 BERTRAM 2063270 N

01-521-769-0352-655106/17/2022 184.81 CLASS 2 CRAWFORD LAKE 2063540 N

274218 MENARDS - BUFFALO 7510

01-111-000-0000-630106/17/2022 44.64 HYDRAULIC CEMENT 60290 N

274219 METRO LEGAL SERVICES INC 45637

274213 LAPLANT DEMO INC 695.85 3141

274214 LEXIS NEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS 579.27 39767

274215 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC 830.94 6066


274217 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 1,387.86 1706

274218 MENARDS - BUFFALO 44.64 7510


Rpt


MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY


T & M TOWING AND SNOW PLOWING



T & M TOWING AND SNOW PLOWING

MAY 2022 TRANSCRIBE STATEMENTS

COMBINE RECERT/ONLINE (MW) TRA

TOW 22013026 96 HONDA ACCORD



1:51:08PMWSM7580


01-091-000-0000-626106/17/2022 105.00 PROCESS SERVING 3378105 N

274220 5818

01-111-000-0000-624506/17/2022 20.00 BOILER LICENSES ABR0282173X N

274221 NET TRANSCRIPTS INC 3844

01-201-000-0000-626106/17/2022 668.64 NT11057 N

274222 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 3549

01-201-000-0000-626106/17/2022 60.00 MAY 2022 JV PEP X3 44431 N

01-250-000-0000-626106/17/2022 20.00 MAY 2022 JAIL JV PEP X1 44431 N

274223 2615

01-201-000-0000-626106/17/2022 208.00 TOW 22014181 06 LEXUS GX 3784 Y

274224 POWERPHONE INC 3220

02-226-000-0000-633806/17/2022 729.00 77098 N

274225 QUADIENT LEASING USA, INC. 3588

11-480-895-0020-641106/17/2022 41.00 HHS POSTAGE METER SUPPLY 16703884 N

11-480-895-0020-641106/17/2022 309.70 HHS POSTAGE METER SUPPLY 167121574 N

274226 SHRED-N-GO, INC 5110

11-480-895-0020-641106/17/2022 206.00 CONF DOC SHREDDER 136400 N

274227 5712

01-201-000-0000-626106/17/2022 50.00 TOW 21033473 BUICK ENCLAVE 85695 N

01-201-000-0000-626106/17/2022 125.00 85601 N

274228 TENNEY/DANETTE 20180

01-091-000-0000-626106/17/2022 144.50 ROSENTHAL TRANSCRIPT 305 Y

01-091-000-0000-626106/17/2022 63.75 ROSENTHAL TRANSCRIPT 304 Y

274219 METRO LEGAL SERVICES INC 105.00 45637

274220 20.00 5818

274221 NET TRANSCRIPTS INC 668.64 3844

274222 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 80.00 3549

274223 208.00 2615

274224 POWERPHONE INC 729.00 3220

274225 QUADIENT LEASING USA, INC. 350.70 3588

274226 SHRED-N-GO, INC 206.00 5110

274227 175.00 5712

274228 TENNEY/DANETTE 208.25 20180


Rpt


JUN 2022 MONTHLY IN-SQUAD SVC

WRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION

WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELEC ASSN

ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC

CENTRACARE HEALTH MONTICELLO

WRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION

WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELEC ASSN

ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC

CENTRACARE HEALTH MONTICELLO



1:51:08PMWSM7580


274229 TJADEN/KIMBERLY LYNN 948

11-450-430-0010-626106/17/2022 600.00 PHTF PROFESSIONAL SVCS Y


01-201-000-0000-620506/17/2022 55.48 UPS POSTAGE 051322 R6172Y212 N

274231 VERIZON 5284

01-201-000-0000-626006/17/2022 1,181.87 2783497 N

274232 WM CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. 3741

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 353.38 23 66216 33007 6/1-6/30 TACTIC 7654643 1593 4 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 131.47 8 26807 23009 LEC 6/1-6/30 7653585 1593 8 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 224.12 13248 63002 HWY 6/1-6/30 7653160 1593 0 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 811.28 24 17920 83004 JC 6/1-6/30 7654801 1593 8 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 248.60 25 18707 63002 OLD GC MAY 2022 0481312 1766 2 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 162.76 7 04004 83006 OTSEGO 6/1-6/30 7653450 1593 5 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 264.37 13247 13004 OLD BLDG 6/1-6/30 7653157 1593 6 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 188.27 17 19867 53005 HWY 6/1-6/30 7654078 1593 3 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 239.57 13247 33000 HHS 6/1-6/30 7653158 1593 4 N

274233 74323

11-450-473-0010-626106/17/2022 1,012.00 CTC OUTREACH STAFF HRS N

274234 1383

03-350-000-0000-654306/17/2022 2,846.56 STREET LIGHT 35029692006 N

03-350-000-0000-654306/17/2022 72.42 LIGHTS ON 38 RAB 35029692006 N

03-350-000-0000-654306/17/2022 43.72 WARNING SIGN CR 75 35029692006 N

274235 5715

01-025-000-0000-626006/17/2022 2,398.80 ZOOM STANDARD VIZ ANNUAL INV152385824 N

274236 3254

81-830-000-0000-690206/21/2022 22.18 JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 6

274229 TJADEN/KIMBERLY LYNN 600.00 948


274231 VERIZON 1,181.87 5284

274232 WM CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. 2,623.82 3741

274233 1,012.00 74323

274234 2,962.70 1383

274235 2,398.80 5715

274236 22.18 3254


Rpt




1:51:08PMWSM7580


274237 MN STATE TREASURER-TIF 3536

81-830-000-0000-690206/21/2022 6,744.18 JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT N

274237 MN STATE TREASURER-TIF 6,744.18 3536

1,532,763.34


Rpt

Range Selected from Warrant # 1 thru Warrant # 299999 171 Warrants Printed

Final Total


MN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

MN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES



1:53:45PMWSM7580


707062 1513

84-000-000-0000-682106/17/2022 3,384.10 DNR N

84-000-000-0000-682106/17/2022 92.00 G & F N

707063 QUADIENT LEASING USA, INC. 3588

01-000-000-0000-146206/17/2022 10,000.00 POSTAGE METER N

707065 FORTE PAYMENT SYSTEMS INC 43

01-025-000-0000-635906/21/2022 382.35 MAY 2022 CC FEES 222523 N

01-025-000-0000-635906/21/2022 78.83 MAY 2022 CC FEES 222522 N

01-025-000-0000-635906/21/2022 8.59 MAY 2022 CC FEES 238403 N

20-393-000-0000-635906/21/2022 8.88 MAY 2022 CC FEES 287452 N

01-091-000-0000-635906/21/2022 0.30 MAY 2022 CC FEES 222525 N

03-310-000-0000-635906/21/2022 4.86 MAY 2022 CC FEES 221750 N

03-310-000-0000-635906/21/2022 30.67 MAY 2022 CC FEES 221749 N

01-103-000-0000-635906/21/2022 10.24 MAY 2022 CC FEES 221747 N

01-103-000-0000-635906/21/2022 0.41 MAY 2022 CC FEES 221746 N

707062 3,476.10 1513

707063 QUADIENT LEASING USA, INC. 10,000.00 3588

707065 FORTE PAYMENT SYSTEMS INC 525.13 43

14,001.23


Rpt


Final Total


TASER TRAINING CARTRIDGE X300

CASE #22012857 12 HARLEY DAVID

MNCCC ALEXANDRIA CONF MILEAGE

CENTRA SOTA COOPERATIVE - BUFFALO

CENTRA SOTA COOPERATIVE - BUFFALO



1:52:23PMWSM7580


808958 ANOKA COUNTY CORRECTIONS 13935

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 8,715.76 MAY 2022 JUV CORR FEE 870-1000086-1 N

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 251.39 MAY 2022 JUV DET FEE 869-1000086-1 N

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 20.42 MAY 2022 JUV CORR FEE 869-1000086-1 N

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 2,068.12 MAY 2022 JUV CORR FEE 871-1000086-1 N

808959 AXON ENTERPRISES INC 6851

01-201-000-0000-633806/13/2022 9,645.00 INS075171 N

01-201-000-0000-641106/13/2022 1,425.27 TASER BATTERY PACK X15 INS075171 N

01-201-000-0000-641106/13/2022 378.50 TASER CARTRIDGE 25FT X10 INS075171 N

01-201-000-0000-648006/13/2022 4,799.04 TASER X3 INS075171 N

01-201-000-0000-648006/13/2022 213.24 TASER HOLSTERS X3 INS075171 N

808960 BUFFALO/CITY OF 1075

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 14.80 16-090100-00 STREET LIGHT 160901000 N

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 14.80 09-190000-00 STREET LIGHT 091900000 N

808961 BURDAS TOWING 4902

01-201-000-0000-626106/13/2022 269.50 22-103400 Y

808962 7544

03-340-000-0000-656306/13/2022 22,044.29 DIESEL FUEL BUFFALO 8103740 N

03-340-000-0000-656406/13/2022 31,626.27 UNLEADED FUEL 8103646 N

03-340-000-0000-656406/13/2022 11,607.00 UNLEADED FUEL 8103740 N

808963 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 1655

01-521-699-0390-634306/13/2022 10.50 TANKS FOR FABRICATION 173967 N

808964 COOPER/CONNIEMAE 13591

01-063-000-0000-633806/13/2022 128.12 ER20220609 N

808965 DELL MARKETING LP 1264

01-201-000-0000-648006/13/2022 1,936.50 OFFICE SVR COMPUTER PKG 10583386258 N

808958 ANOKA COUNTY CORRECTIONS 11,055.69 13935

808959 AXON ENTERPRISES INC 16,461.05 6851

808960 BUFFALO/CITY OF 29.60 1075

808961 BURDAS TOWING 269.50 4902

808962 65,277.56 7544

808963 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 10.50 1655

808964 COOPER/CONNIEMAE 128.12 13591

808965 DELL MARKETING LP 1,936.50 1264


Rpt


DESIGN ELECTRICAL INC-COLD SPRING ELEC.

DESIGN ELECTRICAL INC-COLD SPRING ELEC.

CSAH 19 REPLACE AWF POLE FIXTU

CSAH 34 REPLACE AWF POLE FIXTU

CSAH 113 UNDERGROUND WIRE FIX



1:52:23PMWSM7580


808966 609

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 986.95 16719 N

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 708.74 LIGHTS OUT 9/109/124 16721 N

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 1,137.88 CSAH 19 SIGNAL IN FLASH 16723 N

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 92.50 CSAH 20 SIGNAL MAINT 16718 N

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 158.96 CSAH 20 BAD PUSH BUTTON 16720 N

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 986.96 16719 N


03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 158.96 CSAH 19 BAD PUSH BUTTON 16720 N


03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 5,351.50 16722 N

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 375.00 CSAH 19 CAMERA ISSUE 16717 N

808967 DM STAMPS & SPECIALTIES 33159

01-201-000-0000-641106/13/2022 19.65 NAME PLATES (OFFICE SVR) IV00529594 N

01-201-000-0000-641106/13/2022 35.80 NAME PLATES (LBJ / JH) IV00529595 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/13/2022 39.30 JAIL NAME PLATE (EA / RULE 5) IV00529594 N

808968 FASTENAL COMPANY 4634

03-350-000-0000-653906/13/2022 600.87 NYLOKS - SIGN DEPT MNMON 138864 N

808969 FIRST CHOICE- ST CLOUD 3270

01-521-768-0304-680706/13/2022 24.00 RESALE ITEMS @ COLLINWOOD 2105:136470 N

01-521-788-0304-680706/13/2022 24.00 RESALE ITEMS @ SCHROEDER 2105:136470 N

01-521-799-0304-680706/13/2022 24.00 RESALE ITEMS @ BERTRAM 2105:136470 N

808970 FS3 INC 1983

03-330-000-0000-653906/13/2022 1,047.18 ROLL UP SIGNS & STANDS 77754 N

03-330-000-0000-685906/13/2022 98.16 WHITE PAINT 77753 N

808971 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 7338

03-350-000-0000-654306/13/2022 376.65 HWY LOCATES MAY 279 TICKETS 2051580 N

808972 GREEN INTERIORS 2884

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 200.00 GC MONTHLY PLANT SVC 2022-0643390 Y

808966 10,489.95 609

808967 DM STAMPS & SPECIALTIES 94.75 33159

808968 FASTENAL COMPANY 600.87 4634

808969 FIRST CHOICE- ST CLOUD 72.00 3270

808970 FS3 INC 1,145.34 1983

808971 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 376.65 7338


Rpt


BUSINESS CARDS - ADMIN STAFF

BUSINESS CARDS - ADMIN STAFF

MONTHLY HVAC WATER TREATMENT

MAY 2022 JUV DETENTION EHM FEE

MAY BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE

ARP ACCT 013323-000 A BERNARD

MN COUNTIES COMPUTER COOPERATIVE


MN COUNTIES COMPUTER COOPERATIVE




1:52:23PMWSM7580


808973 INTEGRIPRINT INC 13590

01-031-000-0000-641106/13/2022 33.10 55710 N

01-031-000-0000-641106/13/2022 33.10 55709 N

01-105-000-0000-641106/13/2022 164.92 X8 NOTES & X40 NOTES 55599 N

808974 JAYTECH INC 5243

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 720.00 220293 N

808975 JOINT POWERS WATER BOARD 4148

01-521-763-0360-625106/13/2022 57.63 82-00000078-00-5 BEEBE LAKE N

808976 KNIFE RIVER 514

03-326-000-0000-665006/13/2022 370,118.20 CONT 2206 CP 037-171 RECONST 1 N

808977 MINNESOTA MONITORING INC 46490

01-025-000-0000-626106/13/2022 14,013.00 ADULT EHM MAY 2022 13711 N

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 105.00 MAY 2022 JUV CORR EHM FEE 13712 N

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 217.00 MAY 2022 JUV CORR EHM FEE 13713 N

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 434.00 13713 N

808978 284

01-105-000-0000-633806/13/2022 540.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRAINING 2205090 N

808979 1487

01-107-000-0000-635906/13/2022 2,734.20 N

808980 MONTICELLO/CITY OF 1343

01-099-493-8433-602006/13/2022 820.92 N

808981 OTSEGO/CITY OF 2316

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 138.78 SHOP WATER/SEWER 4/13-5/16 28100-00 N

808972 GREEN INTERIORS 200.00 2884

808973 INTEGRIPRINT INC 231.12 13590

808974 JAYTECH INC 720.00 5243

808975 JOINT POWERS WATER BOARD 57.63 4148

808976 KNIFE RIVER 370,118.20 514

808977 MINNESOTA MONITORING INC 14,769.00 46490

808978 540.00 284

808979 2,734.20 1487

808980 MONTICELLO/CITY OF 820.92 1343

808981 OTSEGO/CITY OF 138.78 2316


Rpt


PRAIRIE LAKES YOUTH PROGRAMS

RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE LLC

THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP



KEYS FOR HORSE BARN @ BERTRAM

INTRCHG CORES & HOUSING RP/MT

SP 619-035 CSAH 19 ASH TO CHES

2022 ALADTEC SUBSCRIPTION X69



1:52:23PMWSM7580


808982 PRAIRIE LAKES YOUTH PROGRAMS 6704

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 8,956.00 MAY 2022 JUV CORR FEE 641-237-1 N

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 6,292.00 MAY 2022 JUV CORR FEE 641-237-1 N

808983 6140

01-521-799-0360-641106/13/2022 105.00 A42418 N

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 1,160.00 A42407 N

808984 6641

01-091-000-0000-626006/13/2022 1,630.20 MAY WESTLAW FEE 846449915 N

808985 VILLAGE RANCH INC 68945

01-025-000-0000-626506/13/2022 850.00 86JV215815 DET PHYS EVAL 06/0229 N

808986 VOSS LIGHTING 3687

01-111-000-0000-630106/13/2022 550.20 LEC BULBS 15359065-01 N

808987 WAVERLY/CITY OF 1785

01-111-000-0000-625106/13/2022 82.33 02 00000260 00 4 4/7-5/11 WAT/ 02-00000260-00 N

808988 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 3365

03-320-000-0000-650506/13/2022 58,982.00 SAP 086-683 001 JCT CR 148 TO R-018686-000-7 N

03-326-000-0000-626106/13/2022 8,464.87 R-016412-000-2 N

03-326-000-0000-626106/13/2022 4,839.62 CP 037-171 CSAH 37-18-19 LOST R-012423-000-2 N

808989 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 46433

84-000-000-0000-682006/13/2022 11,803.00 MNDRIVE N


84-000-000-0000-682006/14/2022 19,634.75 MNDRIVE N

808991 ALADTEC INC 4346

01-250-000-0000-626006/15/2022 4,871.00 INV00189270 N

808982 15,248.00 6704

808983 1,265.00 6140

808984 1,630.20 6641

808985 VILLAGE RANCH INC 850.00 68945

808986 VOSS LIGHTING 550.20 3687

808987 WAVERLY/CITY OF 82.33 1785

808988 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 72,286.49 3365

808989 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 11,803.00 46433



Rpt


CORRECTEK IMPLEMENTATION FEE

LAKE CHARLOTTE FUTURE LOCATING

06-2022 LAKE CHARLOTTE LOCATIN



1:52:23PMWSM7580


808992 ANDERSON / ALICIA 5431

11-430-700-0010-633806/15/2022 59.31 SS - TRAINING N

11-430-700-0010-633806/15/2022 118.05 SS - TRAINING N

808993 ANDERSON/MORGANNE 6110

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 50.31 SS - TRAVEL N

808994 AUDETTE/BRIGETTE 5887

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 23.41 SS - TRAVEL N

808995 CORRECTEK, INC. 5748

01-250-000-0000-645906/15/2022 5,319.00 5487 N

01-250-000-0000-645906/15/2022 1,100.00 JUN 2022 CORRECTEK SUPPORT 5484 N

808996 DELL MARKETING LP 1264

01-063-000-0000-648006/15/2022 3,053.07 MOBILE PRECISION 7760 & DOCK 10588889383 N

01-063-000-0000-648006/15/2022 815.98 QTY 2 34IN CURVED MONITOR 10586233753 N

808997 DOMJAHN/REBECCA J 17633

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 49.16 SS - TRAVEL N

808998 GLOVER CONSULTING LLC 533

01-063-000-0000-626106/15/2022 5,490.00 ONBASE J.G. 2022-05 20358 N

808999 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 7338

73-846-000-0000-626106/15/2022 141.90 N

73-846-000-0000-626106/15/2022 8.10 2051094 N

01-063-000-0000-626106/15/2022 12.15 FIBER LOCATE 9 TICKETS 2022-052051581 N

809000 HAAS/BRITTANI 5888

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 101.23 SS - TRAVEL N

808991 ALADTEC INC 4,871.00 4346

808992 ANDERSON / ALICIA 177.36 5431

808993 ANDERSON/MORGANNE 50.31 6110

808994 AUDETTE/BRIGETTE 23.41 5887

808995 CORRECTEK, INC. 6,419.00 5748

808996 DELL MARKETING LP 3,869.05 1264

808997 DOMJAHN/REBECCA J 49.16 17633

808998 GLOVER CONSULTING LLC 5,490.00 533

808999 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 162.15 7338

809000 HAAS/BRITTANI 101.23 5888


Rpt


MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING

MEND CORRECTIONAL CARE PLLC

JUN 2022 HEALTHCARE/NURSING AD

JUN 2022 DISCOUNT VACANT NURSI

SERVICES I/M MONITOR MAY 2022



1:52:23PMWSM7580


809001 HARTMAN/KARI 69287

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 186.63 SS - TRAVEL N

11-430-700-0010-633406/15/2022 23.71 SS - MEALS TAXABLE N

809002 HAUSLADEN/SAMANTHA 2328

11-450-430-0010-633306/15/2022 15.21 PH - TRAVEL N

809003 HESHISER/RHONDA 30190

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 162.63 SS - TRAVEL N

809004 HYLLA/JILL 21385

11-450-430-0010-633306/15/2022 17.55 PH - TRAVEL N

809005 INTEREUM INC 33192

34-163-100-8174-648006/15/2022 7,055.84 GC LEVEL 1 HHS FURNITURE 188211 N

809006 KNOW iNK LLC 5078

01-041-071-0000-626006/15/2022 730.00 ANNUAL DATA ACTIVATION 10087 N

809007 LANGREHR/MADISON 6163

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 17.55 SS - TRAVEL N

809008 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING 1048

01-250-000-0000-626106/15/2022 1,200.00 JAIL EVAL & ACCESS X2 14669 N

809009 MEND CORRECTIONAL CARE PLLC 3413

01-250-000-0000-645806/15/2022 42,453.77 6685 6

01-250-000-0000-645806/15/2022 1,150.00 6685 6

809010 MINNESOTA MONITORING INC 46490

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 1,224.00 13735 N

809001 HARTMAN/KARI 210.34 69287

809002 HAUSLADEN/SAMANTHA 15.21 2328

809003 HESHISER/RHONDA 162.63 30190

809004 HYLLA/JILL 17.55 21385

809005 INTEREUM INC 7,055.84 33192

809006 KNOW iNK LLC 730.00 5078

809007 LANGREHR/MADISON 17.55 6163

809008 1,200.00 1048

809009 41,303.77 3413

809010 MINNESOTA MONITORING INC 1,224.00 46490


Rpt

-


07-2022 FUTURE LOCATING INVOIC

BABY SEAT FOR PASSPORT PHOTOS

247550804001 GENERAL OFFICE SU

ON-DEMAND SERVICES GROUP INC

ON-DEMAND SERVICES GROUP INC

SEACHANGE PRINTING AND MARKETING LLC



1:52:23PMWSM7580


809011 MP NEXLEVEL LLC 6623

73-846-000-0000-626106/15/2022 412.40 N

73-846-000-0000-626106/15/2022 87.60 07-2022 LOCATING MAY 2022 1122288 N

809012 MYHRO/LEAH 6151

01-041-000-0000-641006/15/2022 15.00 N

809013 NOVACEK/THERESA 49887

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 276.15 SS - TRAVEL N

809014 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 6097

01-250-000-0000-645906/15/2022 76.90 244819108001 JAIL MED OFFICE 244819108001 N

01-250-000-0000-641106/15/2022 38.24 247550804001 I/M ID POUCH X4 247550804001 N

01-250-000-0000-641006/15/2022 44.11 247550804001 N

01-250-000-0000-641006/15/2022 223.92 245152791001 COPY PAPER X4 245152791001 N

809015 4439

01-063-000-0000-626106/15/2022 20,160.00 TONY KOTHLOW ERP 2022-05 31827 N

809016 OVALL/SHERRY 59186

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 47.39 SS - TRAVEL N

809017 PARTLOW/CHRISTINE 51893

11-480-895-0020-633806/15/2022 6.02 ADMIN - TRAINING N

809018 ROSITAS/LYNETTE 57078

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 122.27 SS - TRAVEL N

11-430-700-0010-633406/15/2022 26.00 SS - MEALS TAXABLE N

809019 SCHAAF/BLAKE 59157

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 55.57 SS - TRAVEL N

809020 3596

809011 MP NEXLEVEL LLC 500.00 6623

809012 MYHRO/LEAH 15.00 6151

809013 NOVACEK/THERESA 276.15 49887

809014 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 383.17 6097

809015 20,160.00 4439

809016 OVALL/SHERRY 47.39 59186

809017 PARTLOW/CHRISTINE 6.02 51893

809018 ROSITAS/LYNETTE 148.27 57078

809019 SCHAAF/BLAKE 55.57 59157


Rpt


SEACHANGE PRINTING AND MARKETING LLC



1:52:23PMWSM7580


01-041-071-0000-641006/15/2022 1,100.00 PRIMARY BALLOTS 2022 41283 N

809021 SPLICHAL/MADDIE 5883

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 49.72 SS - TRAVEL N

809022 STENBERG/WENDY 5730

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 54.41 SS - TRAVEL N

809023 STERICYCLE INC 4702

01-250-000-0000-645806/15/2022 121.59 MAY 2022 MEDICAL WASTE 4010970035 N

809024 TUCKER/SHANNON 5773

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 190.70 SS - TRAVEL N

809025 TW VENDING INC 929

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 10,764.01 TURNKEY VEND 051622-053122 10033515 N

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 108.35 SUPPLIES INDIGENT MAY 2022 10033624 N

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 2,875.00 TURNKEY PHONE 051622-053122 10034039 N

809026 USIC HOLDINGS INC 4429

01-063-000-0000-626106/15/2022 156.52 2022-05 QTY 7 LOCATES 513571 N

809027 VARHOL/NICOLE 68703

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 249.22 SS - TRAVEL Y

11-430-700-0010-633406/15/2022 19.36 SS - MEALS TAXABLE Y


01-521-687-0300-620306/15/2022 41.47 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-521-687-0300-648006/15/2022 268.43 NEW EQUIP 651 802 3129 9907769954 N

01-521-799-0300-620306/15/2022 24.28 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-522-000-0000-620306/15/2022 87.94 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-603-000-0000-620306/15/2022 80.02 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

02-230-000-0000-680106/15/2022 80.02 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

03-310-000-0000-620306/15/2022 626.24 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

809020 1,100.00 3596

809021 SPLICHAL/MADDIE 49.72 5883

809022 STENBERG/WENDY 54.41 5730

809023 STERICYCLE INC 121.59 4702

809024 TUCKER/SHANNON 190.70 5773

809025 TW VENDING INC 13,747.36 929

809026 USIC HOLDINGS INC 156.52 4429

809027 VARHOL/NICOLE 268.58 68703


Rpt


05-2022 LAKE MONITORING SAMPLE

ASST. WRIGHT COUNTY ATTORNEY



1:52:23PMWSM7580


01-121-000-0000-620306/15/2022 40.01 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-201-000-0000-620306/15/2022 1,550.01 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-201-281-0000-620306/15/2022 80.02 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-201-281-0000-620306/15/2022 41.47 763 274 8409 9907769954 N

01-025-000-0000-620306/15/2022 1,611.80 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-031-000-0000-620306/15/2022 82.94 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-041-000-0000-620306/15/2022 1.31 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-043-000-0000-620306/15/2022 46.47 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-063-000-0000-620306/15/2022 572.11 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-091-000-0000-620306/15/2022 18.00 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

01-103-000-0000-620306/15/2022 378.87 442492531-00001 9907769954 N

809029 WRIGHT SWCD 7052

73-846-000-0000-626106/15/2022 294.00 86091005 N

809030 ZACHMANN/KRISTA 4706

11-430-700-0010-633306/15/2022 104.71 SS - TRAVEL N


84-000-000-0000-682006/15/2022 30,650.36 MNDRIVE N


84-000-000-0000-682006/16/2022 17,680.45 MNDRIVE N

809033 AIG RETIREMENT COMPANY 2330

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 6,466.92 DEFERRED COMP N

01-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 685.00 ROTH N

03-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 220.00 DEFERRED COMP N

03-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 100.00 ROTH N

11-420-000-0000-223206/17/2022 25.00 DEFERRED COMP N

11-430-000-0000-223206/17/2022 585.00 DEFERRED COMP N

11-430-000-0000-223906/17/2022 275.00 ROTH N

809034 1916

01-000-000-0000-223806/17/2022 90.00 UNON DUES N

809028 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES LLC 5,631.41 4628

809029 WRIGHT SWCD 294.00 7052

809030 ZACHMANN/KRISTA 104.71 4706



809033 AIG RETIREMENT COMPANY 8,356.92 2330


Rpt


ASST. WRIGHT COUNTY ATTORNEY

MSRS HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN

MSRS HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN



1:52:23PMWSM7580


809035 ING 7062

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 5,304.00 DEFERRED COMP N

01-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 3,172.00 ROTH N

03-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 785.00 DEFERRED COMP N

03-000-000-0000-223906/17/2022 425.00 ROTH N

11-420-000-0000-223206/17/2022 140.00 DEFERRED COMP N

11-430-000-0000-223206/17/2022 1,040.00 DEFERRED COMP N

11-430-000-0000-223906/17/2022 345.00 ROTH N

11-450-000-0000-223206/17/2022 1,035.00 DEFERRED COMP N

11-450-000-0000-223906/17/2022 330.00 ROTH N

11-480-000-0000-223206/17/2022 991.30 DEFERRED COMP N

72-605-000-0000-223206/17/2022 185.00 DEFERRED COMP N

72-605-000-0000-223906/17/2022 150.00 ROTH N

809036 MN AFSCME LOCAL 2685 1900

01-000-000-0000-223806/17/2022 10.00 STRIKE N

11-420-000-0000-223806/17/2022 40.00 STRIKE N

11-430-000-0000-223806/17/2022 10.00 STRIKE N

11-450-000-0000-223806/17/2022 40.00 STRIKE N

809037 404

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 50.00 HEALTH SAVINGS N

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 25,407.57 HCSP SEVERANC N

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 407.45 HEALTH SAVINGS N

03-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 60.29 HEALTH SAVINGS N

11-480-000-0000-223206/17/2022 55.04 HEALTH SAVINGS N

809038 WRIGHT CO CAFETERIA PLAN 1979

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 13,425.73 MEDICAL EXP CAFETERIA N

01-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 5,586.07 DAY CARE CAFETERIA N

03-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 4.17 DAY CARE CAFETERIA N

03-000-000-0000-223206/17/2022 987.48 MEDICAL EXP CAFETERIA N




809034 90.00 1916

809035 ING 13,902.30 7062

809036 MN AFSCME LOCAL 2685 100.00 1900

809037 25,980.35 404


Rpt




1:52:23PMWSM7580











84-000-000-0000-682006/17/2022 20,003.11 MNDRIVE N

809040 AMAZON BUSINESS 1347

11-480-895-0020-641106/17/2022 31.99 HHS OPERTING SUPPLIES 16V4-TK43-QQJP N

809041 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 1646



809042 BUFF N GLO INC 607

01-103-000-0000-645206/17/2022 25.80 CAR WASHES ACCT 6055 N

809043 BUFFALO/CITY OF 1075

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 84.01 01 017020 03 APR 2022 GC 2ND N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 13,499.87 02 068000 00 APR 2022 10 2ND N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 39,929.85 27 009010 01 LEC APR 2022 UTIL N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 7,502.81 02 069000 00 APR 2022 10 2ND N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 2,381.84 11 059850 00 APR 2022 PUBLIC W N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 159.09 11 059855 00 APR 2022 PUBLIC W N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 7,910.01 27 009020 00 HWY 3/31-4/30 N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 1,600.00 02 068010 00 APR 2022 10 2ND N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 9,488.46 27 009030 00 JC APR 2022 UTILI N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 11,308.21 27 009025 00 GC APR 2022 UTILI N

01-111-000-0000-625106/17/2022 2,051.05 08 052100 03 APR 2022 COMMERCI N

809038 WRIGHT CO CAFETERIA PLAN 31,018.07 1979


809040 AMAZON BUSINESS 31.99 1347

809041 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 158.57 1646

809042 BUFF N GLO INC 25.80 607

809043 BUFFALO/CITY OF 95,915.20 1075


Rpt


TOW 22014046 ADLK923 15 STEALT

TOW 22014459 JEH017 07 DOGDGE

CENTRAL MN MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC

CENTRAL MN MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC



1:52:23PMWSM7580


809044 BURDAS TOWING 4902

01-201-000-0000-626106/17/2022 235.40 22-104171 Y

01-201-000-0000-626106/17/2022 231.00 22-104460 Y

809045 CAPTIVATED, LLC 565

11-450-430-0010-626006/17/2022 506.00 JUN22 HHS SOFTWARE SPRT 022473 Y

809046 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS LLC 1233

03-310-000-0000-648506/17/2022 4,845.50 OMS ASSETS 1356 N

809047 10751

01-025-000-0000-626106/17/2022 600.00 SEAN JOHNSON 3-8-1984, BIP FEE819069 N

809048 CHAMBERLAIN OIL CO 1925

03-340-000-0000-656806/17/2022 1,409.23 MOTOR OILS 399342 N

809049 DALEIDEN/MARK 3179

01-005-000-0000-633306/17/2022 782.73 1338 MILES 1/4-4/26/22 N

809050 DAVIS/JEFFREY 4499

01-201-000-0000-633806/17/2022 26.67 BOAT SAFETY TRNG (JD) N

01-201-000-0000-633806/17/2022 26.67 ATV SAFETY TRNG (JD) N

809051 GLOVER CONSULTING LLC 533

11-480-895-8228-626006/17/2022 135.00 HHS EDMS PROJECT 2022-05 20359 N

809052 GRAINGER 2812


03-340-000-0000-641106/17/2022 66.83 SHOP SUPPLIES 9328841052 N

03-340-000-0000-641106/17/2022 8.19 SHOP SUPPLIES 9328841060 N

809053 HIRMAN/ALEX 3717

01-025-000-0000-633806/17/2022 124.02 MAPCO SPRING CONFERENCE ER20220613 N

809044 BURDAS TOWING 466.40 4902

809045 CAPTIVATED, LLC 506.00 565

809046 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS LLC 4,845.50 1233

809047 600.00 10751

809048 CHAMBERLAIN OIL CO 1,409.23 1925

809049 DALEIDEN/MARK 782.73 3179

809050 DAVIS/JEFFREY 53.34 4499

809051 GLOVER CONSULTING LLC 135.00 533

809052 GRAINGER 89.03 2812


Rpt


AQUASWEEP HERBICIDE DITCH SPRA

LIBERATE SURFACTANT DITCH SPRA



1:52:23PMWSM7580


809054 INTEGRIPRINT INC 13590

11-480-895-0020-641106/17/2022 97.35 HHS BUSINESS CARDS-X3 55750 N



809055 INTEREUM INC 33192

34-163-100-8174-660206/17/2022 1,905.75 STORAGE CASE 188511 N

809056 LOCKWOOD/BECKY 6166

01-025-000-0000-633806/17/2022 121.68 MAPCO SPRING CONFERENCE ER20220614 N

809057 MEYER/NICHOLE ANN 444

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 420.00 PR 20 2247 CONTRACT MAY 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 20 2244 CONTRACT MAY 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 18 6701 CONTRACT MAY 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 20 2246 CONTRACT MAY 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 14 944 CONTRACT MAY 22 Y

809058 MILLER/JOLEEN 5726

01-201-000-0000-633806/17/2022 50.71 MEALS X4 N

809059 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 5490

01-522-000-0000-641106/17/2022 1,361.75 48550011 N

01-522-000-0000-641106/17/2022 125.00 48487381 N

809060 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 6097

11-480-895-0020-641106/17/2022 34.99 HHS OPERATING SUPPLIES 244533917001 N



809061 PLAGGERMAN/MARGARET M 137

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 138.60 P1 90 001366 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 120.00 P3 87 001083 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

809053 HIRMAN/ALEX 124.02 3717

809054 INTEGRIPRINT INC 519.20 13590

809055 INTEREUM INC 1,905.75 33192

809056 LOCKWOOD/BECKY 121.68 6166

809057 MEYER/NICHOLE ANN 1,300.00 444

809058 MILLER/JOLEEN 50.71 5726

809059 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 1,486.75 5490

809060 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 190.62 6097


Rpt


PRESBYTERIAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

PR 21 2646 CONTRACT MARCH 22





1:52:23PMWSM7580


01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 145.00 PR 09 6274 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 127.00 P9 94 000586 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 135.60 P8 01 003158 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 120.00 P4 05 002789 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 127.00 PR 10 6777 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 120.00 P8 93 002688 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 140.00 P9 88 000434 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 148.80 PR 10 6118 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 135.00 P1 88 002016 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 P7 94 002675 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 121.50 PR 09 2533 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 131.40 PR 06 7097 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 120.00 P3 96 002600 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 120.00 P7 88 001386 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 151.90 P0 01 000593 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 132.00 P1 86 001640 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 17 4615 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 120.00 PR 08 6052 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 06 7231 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 120.00 P5 88 001385 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 135.90 PR 14 4187 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 130.30 P9 04 000669 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 134.30 PR 09 1334 CONTRACT MAR 22 Y

809062 85

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 20 4717 CONTRACT APRIL 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 825 CONTRACT JAN 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 825 CONTRACT MARCH 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 5986 CONTRACT FEB 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 986 CONTRACT JAN 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 19 5626 CONTRACT JAN 22 N



01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 P0 05 3857 CONTRACT MARCH 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 20 4717 CONTRACT FEB 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 N

809061 PLAGGERMAN/MARGARET M 3,534.30 137


Rpt




PRESBYTERIAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC







1:52:23PMWSM7580


01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 986 CONTRACT FEB 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 2646 CONTRACT JAN 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 20 4717 CONTRACT JAN 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 P0 05 3857 CONTRACT APRIL 22 N



01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 825 CONTRACT FEB 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 2646 CONTRACT FEB 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 P0 05 3857 CONTRACT JAN 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 20 4764 CONTRACT JAN 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 986 CONTRACT MARCH 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 21 5986 CONTRACT JAN 22 N


01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 P0 05 3857 CONTRACT FEB 22 N


01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 20 4764 CONTRACT FEB 22 N

01-013-000-0000-627006/17/2022 220.00 PR 19 5626 CONTRACT FEB 22 N

809063 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC. 707

01-025-000-0000-620506/17/2022 500.00 ACCT 7900 0440 8084 8355 POSTAPPLN01 N

809064 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC. 707

01-201-000-0000-620506/17/2022 1,006.88 7900 0448 9206 9232 051322 POS 60622 N

809065 6140

01-111-000-0000-630106/17/2022 50.00 PIN CYLINDERS AT SHOP A42445 N

809066 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 6221

03-340-000-0000-657006/17/2022 856.40 HWY TIRES 10186944 N

809067 6641

01-091-000-0000-623506/17/2022 426.42 JUNE LIBRARY PLAN 846535280 N

01-201-000-0000-626006/17/2022 213.03 CLEAR SUBSCRIPTION JUN 2022 846470668 N

809062 7,040.00 85

809063 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC. 500.00 707

809064 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC. 1,006.88 707

809065 50.00 6140

809066 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 856.40 6221

809067 639.45 6641


Rpt




1:52:23PMWSM7580


809068 TRIPLETT/KEVIN S 302

01-201-000-0000-633806/17/2022 50.56 MEALS X4 N


01-201-000-0000-620406/17/2022 1,921.64 MAY 2022 64212823 CRADLEPOINT9907531370 N


84-000-000-0000-682006/20/2022 14,449.79 MNDRIVE N

809068 TRIPLETT/KEVIN S 50.56 302

809069 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES LLC 1,921.64 4628


1,026,636.13


Rpt


Final Total




1:52:34PMWSM7580



84-000-000-0000-682006/21/2022 18,642.45 MNDRIVE N


18,642.45


Rpt


Final Total


MFD7518

06/13/202206/13/2022

11:58:28AM06/13/2022


CHEKAuditor Warrants

Page 2ApprovedWARRANT REGISTERWarrant FormAuditor's Warrants

*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***Pay Date

600.00 391304 06/13/2022 06/13/2022CHEK 1 391304

600.00

WARRANT RUN WARRANT STARTING DATE OF DATE OF

FORM WARRANT NO. PAYMENT APPROVAL

PPD CTX

COUNT AMOUNT COUNT AMOUNTWARRANT NO.

ENDING

INFORMATION

TOTAL

MFD7518

06/13/202206/13/2022

11:58:28AM06/13/2022





84 600.00 STATE COLLECTIONS FUND 600.00

600.00 600.00

RECAP BY FUND

FUND AMOUNT NAME ACH AMOUNT NON-ACH AMOUNT

-

TOTAL TOTAL ACH TOTAL NON-ACH-

DMZ4523

06/15/202206/15/2022

3:24:41PM06/14/2022





1,694.15 391323 06/15/2022 06/15/2022CHEK 2 391322

1,694.15



PPD CTX


ENDING

INFORMATION

TOTAL

DMZ4523

06/15/202206/15/2022

3:24:41PM06/14/2022





11

84

1,494.15 HUMAN SERVICES FUND 1,494.15

200.00 STATE COLLECTIONS FUND 200.00

1,694.15 1,694.15

RECAP BY FUND


-

-


KKN7519

06/15/202206/15/2022

8:16:56AM06/14/2022


CHEK-ACHAuditor Warrants



4,932.61 391310 06/15/2022 06/15/2022CHEK 6 391305

8,598.29 503686 06/15/2022 06/15/2022CHEK-ACH 8,598.29 0 13 503674

13,530.90



PPD CTX


ENDING

INFORMATION

TOTAL

13

KKN7519

06/15/202206/15/2022

8:16:56AM06/14/2022





11 13,530.90 HUMAN SERVICES FUND 4,932.618,598.29

13,530.90 8,598.29 4,932.61

RECAP BY FUND


TOTAL TOTAL ACH TOTAL NON-ACH

DMZ4523

06/15/202206/15/2022

11:37:20AM06/14/2022





65,117.03 391321 06/15/2022 06/15/2022CHEK 5 391317

5,588.46 503715 06/15/2022 06/15/2022CHEK-ACH 5,588.46 0 4 503712

70,705.49



PPD CTX


ENDING

INFORMATION

TOTAL

4

DMZ4523

06/15/202206/15/2022

11:37:20AM06/14/2022





11

77

17,364.51 HUMAN SERVICES FUND 11,776.055,588.46

53,340.98 ESTATE RECOVERIES 53,340.98

70,705.49 5,588.46 65,117.03

RECAP BY FUND


-


KKN7519

06/15/202206/15/2022

8:24:21AM06/14/2022





17,135.53 391316 06/15/2022 06/15/2022CHEK 6 391311

66,851.08 503711 06/15/2022 06/15/2022CHEK-ACH 25,008.74 41,842.34 25 503687

83,986.61



PPD CTX


ENDING

INFORMATION

TOTAL

6 19

KKN7519

06/15/202206/15/2022

8:24:21AM06/14/2022





11 83,986.61 HUMAN SERVICES FUND 17,135.5366,851.08

83,986.61 66,851.08 17,135.53

RECAP BY FUND



KKN7519

06/16/202206/16/2022

9:11:52AM06/16/2022


WFXXAuditor Warrants



75.00 263780 06/16/2022 06/16/2022WFXX 1 263780

75.00



PPD CTX


ENDING

INFORMATION

TOTAL

KKN7519

06/16/202206/16/2022

9:11:52AM06/16/2022


WFXXAuditor Warrants



87 75.00 SWF-REP PAYEE FUND 75.00

75.00 75.00

RECAP BY FUND


-


N

N

WSM7580

06/21/202206/21/2022

10:53:07AM06/20/2022


CHEKCommissioner Warrants

22.18 81-830-000-0000-6902CENTRACARE HEALTH MONTICELLO JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 3254

6,744.18 81-830-000-0000-6902MN STATE TREASURER-TIF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 3536

22.18 274236

6,744.18 274237

6,766.36CHEK 2

To DatePO #

From DateInvoice #

Page 1Approved

Account NumberOn-Behalf-of-NameOBO#

WARRANT REGISTER

DescriptionAmountVendor Name

Commissioner's Warrants

Vendor #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Warrant Form Total... Transactions

Pay DateWarrant Form

Tx

*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

WSM7580

06/21/202206/21/2022

10:53:07AM06/20/2022


CHEK-ACHCommissioner Warrants

2,649,889.72 81-830-000-0000-6902ALBERTVILLE/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1849

258,916.71 81-830-000-0000-6902ALBION TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1028

988,393.94 81-830-000-0000-6902ANNANDALE/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1850

159,242.04 81-830-000-0000-6902BUFFALO HRA JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1369

312,300.29 81-830-000-0000-6902BUFFALO TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1861

5,292,714.98 81-830-000-0000-6902BUFFALO/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1075

212,077.70 81-830-000-0000-6902CHATHAM TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 7324

267.33 81-830-000-0000-6902CITY OF DAYTON EDA JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 5828

245,970.96 81-830-000-0000-6902CLEARWATER RIVER WATERSHED JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1910

302,090.07 81-830-000-0000-6902CLEARWATER TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 7325

745,216.32 81-830-000-0000-6902CLEARWATER/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1851

235,619.63 81-830-000-0000-6902COKATO TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1103

859,714.75 81-830-000-0000-6902COKATO/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1852

669,558.90 81-830-000-0000-6902CORINNA TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 7328

2,649,889.72 809071

258,916.71 809072

988,393.94 809073

159,242.04 809074

312,300.29 809075

5,292,714.98 809076

212,077.70 809077

267.33 809078

245,970.96 809079

302,090.07 809080

745,216.32 809081

235,619.63 809082

859,714.75 809083

669,558.90 809084

To DatePO #

From DateInvoice #

Page 2Approved


WARRANT REGISTER



Vendor #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #


Tx

*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

ISD 2687 - HOWARD LAKE-WAVERLY-WINSTED

WSM7580

06/21/202206/21/2022

10:53:07AM06/20/2022



18,609.48 81-830-000-0000-6902DAYTON/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1853

2,463,182.65 81-830-000-0000-6902DELANO/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1670

637,379.85 81-830-000-0000-6902FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1847

193,566.13 81-830-000-0000-6902FRENCH LAKE TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1171

20,283.11 81-830-000-0000-6902HANOVER EDA JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 4640

803,893.75 81-830-000-0000-6902HANOVER/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1908

763,997.61 81-830-000-0000-6902HOWARD LAKE/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1552

11,888.47 81-830-000-0000-6902INDIAN LAKE IMPROVEMENT DIST JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1300

36,643.81 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 111 WATERTOWN-MAYER JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1833

250,589.29 81-830-000-0000-6902JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 3688

57.52 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 2859 - GLENCOE SILVER LAKE JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 3701

152,183.46 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 466 - DASSEL COKATO JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 15459

989,847.51 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 728 - ELK RIVER JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 19585

71,822.94 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 742 - ST. CLOUD JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1838

378,646.77 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 876 - ANNANDALE JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1839

18,609.48 809085

2,463,182.65 809086

637,379.85 809087

193,566.13 809088

20,283.11 809089

803,893.75 809090

763,997.61 809091

11,888.47 809092

36,643.81 809093

250,589.29 809094

57.52 809095

152,183.46 809096

989,847.51 809097

71,822.94 809098

To DatePO #

From DateInvoice #

Page 3Approved


WARRANT REGISTER



Vendor #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #


Tx

*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

WSM7580

06/21/202206/21/2022

10:53:07AM06/20/2022



1,148,536.67 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 877 - BUFFALO JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1840

417,218.41 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 879 - DELANO JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1841

197,889.74 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 881 - MAPLE LAKE JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1843

782,422.01 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 882 - MONTICELLO JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1844

154,732.12 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 883 - ROCKFORD JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1845

1,038,104.63 81-830-000-0000-6902ISD 885 - ST MICHAEL ALBERTVILLE JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 58277

703.81 81-830-000-0000-6902JOINT POWERS WATER BOARD JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 4148

17,115.91 81-830-000-0000-6902LAKE JOHN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 837

24,162.10 81-830-000-0000-6902MAPLE LAKE IMPROVEMENT DIST JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 4692

401,538.73 81-830-000-0000-6902MAPLE LAKE TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1324

887,533.46 81-830-000-0000-6902MAPLE LAKE/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1295

336,837.90 81-830-000-0000-6902MARYSVILLE TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1041

165,808.56 81-830-000-0000-6902MIDDLEVILLE TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1345

198,830.48 81-830-000-0000-6902MONTICELLO EDA JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 4768

378,646.77 809099

1,148,536.67 809100

417,218.41 809101

197,889.74 809102

782,422.01 809103

154,732.12 809104

1,038,104.63 809105

703.81 809106

17,115.91 809107

24,162.10 809108

401,538.73 809109

887,533.46 809110

336,837.90 809111

165,808.56 809112

To DatePO #

From DateInvoice #

Page 4Approved


WARRANT REGISTER



Vendor #Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #


Tx

*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

WSM7580

06/21/202206/21/2022

10:53:07AM06/20/2022



6,494,118.15 81-830-000-0000-6902MONTICELLO/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1343

436,412.71 81-830-000-0000-6902MONTICELLO/TOWNSHIP OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1848

903,838.58 81-830-000-0000-6902MONTROSE/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1854

5,197,355.53 81-830-000-0000-6902OTSEGO/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 2316

328,355.60 81-830-000-0000-6902PORT AUTHORITY JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 3916

860,148.74 81-830-000-0000-6902ROCKFORD TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 7418

879,799.68 81-830-000-0000-6902ROCKFORD/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1856

544,782.48 81-830-000-0000-6902SILVER CREEK TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1463

79,925.30 81-830-000-0000-6902SOUTH HAVEN/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1858

354,041.97 81-830-000-0000-6902SOUTHSIDE TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1440

79,539.00 81-830-000-0000-6902ST MICHAEL EDA JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 4641

4,634,950.17 81-830-000-0000-6902ST MICHAEL/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1857

173,801.67 81-830-000-0000-6902STOCKHOLM TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1862

263,088.66 81-830-000-0000-6902VICTOR TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1507

198,830.48 809113

6,494,118.15 809114

436,412.71 809115

903,838.58 809116

5,197,355.53 809117

328,355.60 809118

860,148.74 809119

879,799.68 809120

544,782.48 809121

79,925.30 809122

354,041.97 809123

79,539.00 809124

4,634,950.17 809125

173,801.67 809126

To DatePO #

From DateInvoice #

Page 5Approved


WARRANT REGISTER




Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #


Tx

*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***

N

N

WSM7580

06/21/202206/21/2022

10:53:07AM06/20/2022



713,765.84 81-830-000-0000-6902WAVERLY/CITY OF JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1785

234,483.18 81-830-000-0000-6902WOODLAND TOWNSHIP JUNE 2022 SETTLEMENT 1530

263,088.66 809127

713,765.84 809128

234,483.18 809129

47,674,407.48CHEK-ACH 59

47,681,173.84 61

To DatePO #

From DateInvoice #

Page 6Approved


WARRANT REGISTER




Total...Warrant #

Total...Warrant #

Warrant Form Total... Transactions

Total... Transactions


Tx

Final

*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***

WSM7580

06/21/202206/21/2022

10:53:07AM06/20/2022



Page 7ApprovedWARRANT REGISTERCommissioner's Warrants Pay DateWarrant Form

6,766.36 274237 06/21/2022 06/21/2022CHEK 2 274236

47,674,407.48 809129 06/21/2022 06/21/2022CHEK-ACH 47,674,407.48 0 59 809071

47,681,173.84



PPD CTX


ENDING

INFORMATION

TOTAL

59

*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***

WSM7580

06/21/202206/21/2022

10:53:07AM06/20/2022



Page 8ApprovedWARRANT REGISTERCommissioner's Warrants Pay DateWarrant Form

81 CURRENT TAX,REAL ESTATE & MOBILE HOMES47,681,173.84 6,766.3647,674,407.48

47,681,173.84 47,674,407.48 6,766.36

RECAP BY FUND



*** W R I G H T C O U N T Y ***

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MINUTES - Wright County

Documents

Transcript of PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MINUTES - Wright County