Climate, fire, farming and the recent vegetation history of subantarctic Campbell Island
Pilot Trophic Model for Subantarctic Water Over the Southern Plateau, New Zealand: a Low Biomass,...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Pilot Trophic Model for Subantarctic Water Over the Southern Plateau, New Zealand: a Low Biomass,...
Pilot trophic model for subantarctic water over the
Southern Plateau, New Zealand: a low biomass,
high transfer efficiency system
Janet M. Bradford-Grievea,*, P. Keith Probertb, Scott D. Noddera,David Thompsona, Julie Hallc, Stuart Hanchetd, Philip Boyde,
John Zeldisf, Allan N. Bakerf, Hugh A. Bestg, Niall Broekhuizenc,Simon Childerhousef, Malcolm Clarka, Mark Hadfielda,
Karl Safic, Ian Wilkinsong
aNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington, New ZealandbDepartment of Marine Science, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
cNIWA Hamilton, P.O. Box 11115, Hamilton, New ZealanddNIWA Nelson, P.O. Box 893, Nelson, New Zealand
eNIWA Centre for Chemical and Physical Oceanography, Chemistry Department, University of Otago,
P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New ZealandfNIWA Christchurch, P.O. Box 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand
gDepartment of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington, New Zealand
Received 21 June 2002; received in revised form 9 January 2003; accepted 22 January 2003
Abstract
The Southern Plateau subantarctic region, southeast of New Zealand, is an important feeding
area for birds, seals and fish, and a fishing ground for commercially significant species. The
Southern Plateau is a major morphometric feature, covering approximately 433,620 km2 with
average depth of 615 m. The region is noted for its relatively low levels of phytoplankton biomass
and primary production that is iron-limited. In order to evaluate the implications of these attributes
for the functioning of this ecosystem a steady-state, 19-compartment model was constructed using
Ecopath with Ecosim software of Christensen et al. [www.ecopath.org]. The system is driven by
primary production that is primarily governed by the supply of iron and light. The total system
biomass of 6.28 g C m� 2 is very low compared with systems so far modelled with a total system
throughput of 1136 g C m� 2 year� 1. In the model, the Southern Plateau retains 69% of the
biomass in the pelagic system and 99% of total production. Although fish are caught demersally,
0022-0981/03/$ - see front matter D 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0022-0981(03)00045-5
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +64-4-386-0300; fax: +64-4-386-2153.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J.M. Bradford-Grieve).
www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
289 (2003) 223–262
most of their food is part of production in the pelagic system. Top predators represent about 0.3%
of total biomass and account for about 0.24 g C m� 2 year� 1 of food consumed made up of birds
0.058 g C m� 2 year� 1, seals 0.041 g C m� 2 year� 1, and toothed 0.094 g C m� 2 year� 1 and
baleen whales 0.051 g C m� 2 year� 1. This amounts to 105,803 tonnes carbon over the whole of
the Southern Plateau and is about 17% of the total amount of food eaten by non-mesopelagic fish.
Mean transfer efficiencies between trophic levels II and IV of 23% are at the high end of the range
reported in the literature. In the model, adult fish production is almost completely accounted for by
the fisheries take (32%), consumption by seals (7%), toothed whales (21%), other adult fish
(13%), and squid (20%). Fish and squid catches are at the trophic levels of 4.8 and 5.0,
respectively. The gross efficiency of the fishery is 0.018% (catch/primary production). Although
not all data come from direct knowledge of this system, the model reflects its general
characteristics, namely a low primary production system dominated by the microbial loop, low
sedimentation to the seafloor, high transfer efficiencies, a long food web and supporting high-level
predators.
D 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ecosystem structure; Fish production; New Zealand; Subantarctic; Transfer efficiency; Trophic model
1. Introduction
The Southern Plateau subantarctic region, southeast of New Zealand, is an important
feeding area for birds, seals and fish, and a fishing ground for commercially important
species. The Southern Plateau is a major morphometric feature, covering approximately
433,620 km2 and includes the Campbell Plateau, the Bounty Plateau, Pukaki Rise,
Campbell Rise, and the Auckland Shelf (Carter et al., 1997). The Plateau rises above
sea level at the Auckland, Campbell, Bounty, and Antipodes Islands. Water depths range
from 0–500 m on the rises to 1500 m at the plateau edge (Summerhayes, 1967a,b; Krause
and Cullen, 1970).
The Southern Plateau region is noted for its relatively low levels of phytoplankton
biomass (chlorophyll a) observed from satellite measurements (Murphy et al., 2001) and
field observations and low levels of primary production despite there being plenty of
phytoplankton nutrients such as nitrates (Bradford-Grieve et al., 1997). Recent studies
in subantarctic waters show that some of the reasons for these observations are the very
low levels of dissolved iron and the way this interacts with the availability of light and
silicate (Boyd et al., 1999). The most obvious impact of iron-limited growth is the
dominance of the phytoplankton by small forms. Therefore, the food web in this region is
relatively long. The length of the food web implies that only a small fraction of the low
phytoplankton production reaches the highest trophic levels of large carnivores. Never-
theless, the subantarctic region over the Southern Plateau is of special interest to fishers
who catch several species of fish there, and to conservationists because there are large
populations of seabirds and populations of seals and sea lions most of which feed in the
region. Contrary to this expectation of low efficiency, this study shows the system is
highly efficient.
The aim of the present paper is to identify and quantify the elements of the oceanic
food web that support the birds, mammals and fish of the Southern Plateau, and to
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262224
answer questions such as: What are the implications of the ‘‘microbial’’ system for the
large animals, fish, and birds that depend on production from this subantarctic ecosys-
tem? What are the differences between this system and other types of ecosystems? What
are the priorities for information acquisition to obtain a more reliable picture of this
ecosystem?
To model the Bounty/Campbell ecosystem, the Ecopath software was used (Christensen
et al., 2000). Ecopath has two elements, one that describes the production term and another
for the energy balance for each group. Ecopath bases the model on an assumption of mass
balance over an arbitrary period, usually a year.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. The study area
The area of the Southern Plateau was measured in plan view using digital bathymetric
data and a Geographic Information System to produce closed polygons representing the
various isobaths. The areas between each isobath were calculated and summed. This
plateau is considered to be the area contained by the 1000-m isobath, excluding the
islands, excluding the South Island at the base of the continental slope, and including the
Pukaki Saddle shallower than about 1500 m (Fig. 1). This area is 433,620 km2 of which
9% is 0–250 m, 18% is 250–500 m, 41% is 500–750 m, and 32% is 750–1000 m and
with an average depth of about 615 m.
Salinities and temperatures are nearly uniform over the Campbell Plateau and have
values characteristic of Subantarctic Mode Water in the Southwest Pacific Basin (34.35–
34.40 and 7 jC, respectively) (Morris et al., 2001). Morris et al. (2001) show that winter
surface mixed layers are 200–300 m deep and that there is weak thermal stratification over
the top 500 m across the central plateau region. The Campbell Plateau is a relatively
quiescent region and is bounded almost on all sides by major ocean fronts. Northwest of
the plateau, subantarctic water is bounded by the Southland Front which is part of the
Subtropical Front (e.g. Heath, 1981) which passes northeastward through the Snares
Trough separating the Campbell Plateau from the Snares Shelf immediately south of New
Zealand. Around the southern and eastern flank of the Campbell Plateau, subantarctic
water is separated from less saline Circumpolar flows in the Southwest Pacific Basin by
the Subantarctic Front (Fig. 1). Water flows generally from west to east around the plateau
and follows the bathymetry into cyclonic flow around the Bounty Trough; there is
evidence of weak flows on the plateau, among them an anticyclonic flow around the
Pukaki Rise (Morris et al., 2001).
Macronutrients in subantarctic water over the Campbell Plateau are in good supply
(Levitus et al., 1993; Bradford-Grieve et al., 1997) although NO3 is in excess relative to
DRSi (Zentara and Kamykowski, 1981). Low dissolved iron concentrations are observed
in upper subantarctic water south of 45jS southeast of Tasmania and southeast of New
Zealand (Sedwick et al., 1997; Boyd et al., 1999). Recent phytoplankton physiological
experiments report iron stress as well as light limitation in spring phytoplankton
populations (Boyd et al., 1999). It appears that the low micronutrient status of this region
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 225
ensures that the ecosystem behaves like a low-nutrient system despite an excess of nitrate
(Bradford-Grieve et al., 1999). Thus the food web is characterised by low chlorophyll
concentrations and small phytoplankton cells. In addition, there is low seasonality in
chlorophyll concentrations, but higher seasonality in phytoplankton and microzooplankton
carbon biomass (Bradford-Grieve et al., 1999). Bradford-Grieve et al. (1999) also report a
large contribution to total community biomass by bacteria and winter bacterial production
to be greater than primary production in the surface 100 m.
In terms of the food web classification of Legendre and Rassoulzadegan (1995), it
appears that, in winter, a ‘‘microbial’’ web or even ‘‘microbial loop’’ system existed
because microbial rather than autotrophic processes dominated (Bradford-Grieve et al.,
1999). The spring food web is classified as ‘‘microbial’’ as phytoplankton made a larger
contribution to the creation of living organic particles than in winter, but material was still
being directed to small heterotrophs such that microzooplankton biomass was greater than
that of mesozooplankton. There is a very low sedimentation of particles from this
‘‘microbial’’ system (Nodder and Northcote, 2001; H. Neil, personal communication).
Fig. 1. Map of the region showing the Southern Plateau (Bounty/Campbell Plateau) and the water masses and
fronts in relation to the Plateau.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262226
2.2. Modelling approach
The modelling approach of Ecopath with Ecosim is given by Christensen et al. (2000).
In this model, a system of simultaneous linear equations can be solved using standard
matrix algebra:
B1PB1EE1 � B1QB1DC11 � B2QB2DC21 � . . .� BnQBnDCn1 � EX1 ¼ 0
B2PB2EE2 � B1QB1DC12 � B2QB2DC22 � . . .� BnQBnDCn2 � EX2 ¼ 0
. . .
BnPBnEEn � B1QB1DC1n � B2QB2DC2n � . . .� BnQBnDCjn � EXn ¼ 0
where Bn is the biomass of element (compartment or box) n, PBn is the production/
biomass ratio, QBn is the consumption/biomass ratio, DCjn is the fraction of prey (n) in
the average diet of predator j, EEn is the ecotrophic efficiency of n, and EXn is the export
of n.
Ecopath sets up a system with as many linear equations as there are groups in the
system and it solves the set for one of the following parameters for each group: biomass
(B); production/biomass ratio (P/B); consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B); ecotrophic effi-
ciency (EE) = fraction of production that is used in the system, i.e. either passed up the
food web, used for biomass accumulation, migration or export. As well as three of the
above parameters, the following parameters must also be entered for all groups: catches
(and discards); net migration rate (here set to 0); biomass accumulation rate (here set to 0);
assimilation rate; diet compositions; fate of detritus. Energy balance within a compartment
is ensured using the equation: consumption = production + respiration + unassimilated
food.
2.3. Model groups (compartments)
From our knowledge of the functioning of the early food web and the diet of high-level
predators, we define the food web of the Bounty Campbell Plateau as having the following
functional compartments. All available information on biomass, catch, P/B ratios, and
consumption rates (Q/B) have been assembled from our own research data, the literature,
and catch statistics. Then species of similar sizes, diets, and consumption rates, etc., were
aggregated within a compartment (Fig. 2). The resulting 19-compartment model consists
of (1) birds, (2) seals and sea lions (3) toothed whales, (4) fish (adult), (5) fish (juvenile)
(6) baleen whales, (7) squid, (8) mesopelagic fish, (9) macrozooplankton, (10) macro-
benthos, (11) mesozooplankton, (12) ciliates, (13) heterotrophic flagellates, (14) meio-
benthos, (15) bacteria (water column), (16) bacteria (sediment), (17) phytoplankton, (18)
detritus water (column), and (19) detritus (benthic).
Biomasses that were not already available in terms of carbon were converted to carbon
using the following relationships. Birds and mammals: 10% of wet weight is assumed
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 227
to be carbon; fish and squid: 10% of wet weight is carbon assuming that carbon
content is about 50% of dry weight and that dry weight is about 20% of wet weight
(Vinogradov, 1953); macro- and mesozooplankton: log(WW) =� 1.537 + 0.852log(C)
Fig. 2. Trophic model for the Southern Plateau, New Zealand. The box size is proportional to the square root of
the compartment biomass. All flows are in g C m� 2.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262228
and log(DW) = 0.499 + 0.991log(C), where WW=wet weight, DW= dry weight, and
C = carbon (Weibe, 1988).
2.4. Input data
The origin of input data is given in Appendix A and is summarised in Tables 1–3.
2.5. Balancing the model
Initially ecotrophic efficiencies (the fraction of total production consumed by predators
or exported from the system) of a number of early food web compartments were >1. Part
Table 1
Prey–predator matrix used in model
Prey/predator 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
(1) Birds
(2) Seals, etc.
(3) Toothed whales
(4) Fish (adult) 0.25 0.3 0.015 0.06
(5) Fish (juvenile) 0.05 0.040 0.07
(6) Baleen whales
(7) Squid 0.30 0.30 0.7 0.015 0.10
(8) Mesopel. fish 0.31 0.45 0.155 0.40 0.07
(9) Macrozoopl. 0.34 0.615 0.40 0.50 0.70 0.38 0.05
(10) Macrobenthos 0.160 0.05
(11) Mesozoopl. 0.60 0.10 0.62 0.55 0.15
(12) Ciliates 0.20
(13) Het. flagellates 0.15 0.55 0.60 0.10
(14) Meiobenthos 0.30 0.20
(15) Bacteria (col.) 0.20
(16) Bacteria (sed.) 0.60 0.80
(17) Phytoplankton 0.30 0.10 0.40 0.70
(18) Detritus (col.) 1.0
(19) Detritus (sed.) 1.0
Sum 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0
Numbers represent biomass fractions of food ingested.
Table 2
Average annual catch (wet tonnes) by species from stocks inhabiting the Campbell Plateau (data from Annala
et al., 1999)
Species Range Average N
Hake 1803–3956 2999 (area 1) 9
Hoki 10,000–34,000 subantarctic 19,300 subantarctic 9
76,000–165,000 west coast SI 109,667 west coast SI 9
Ling 935–7510 4946 (area 6) 9
Orange roughy 200–3850 1158 6
Oreos 2528–5645 4457 4
Southern blue whiting 13.7–76.2 30,117 9
N= number of years averaged. SI = South Island.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 229
Table 3
Input parameters and calculated parameters (in bold) for the Southern Plateau
Catch Trophic
level
Biomass P/B Q/B EE P/Q Net
efficiency
R A R/A P/R R/B Flow to
detritus
(1) Birds 0.00000105 5.3 0.00158 0.30 36.5 0.002 0.008 0.010 0.046 0.046 0.990 0.010 28.900 0.012
(2) Seals 0.00000066 5.7 0.0009 0.22 46.0 0.04 0.005 0.006 0.033 0.033 0.994 0.006 36.580 0.008
(3) Toothed whales 5.9 0.0085 0.06 11.0 0.00 0.005 0.007 0.074 0.075 0.993 0.007 8.740 0.019
(4) Fish (adult) 0.0153 4.8 0.4517 0.30 2.60 0.935 0.115 0.141 0.805 0.940 0.856 0.169 1.760 0.244
(5) Fish (juvenile) 4.5 0.086 1.00 3.00 0.945 0.333 0.417 0.120 0.206 0.583 0.714 1.400 0.056
(6) Baleen whales 5.0 0.004 0.038 12.8 0.00 0.003 0.004 0.041 0.041 0.996 0.004 10.202 0.010
(7) Squid 0.0042 5.0 0.0204 8.00 22.0 0.992 0.364 0.455 0.196 0.359 0.545 0.833 9.600 0.091
(8) Mesopelagic fish 4.5 0.285 1.00 16.0 0.95 0.063 0.104 2.449 2.734 0.896 0.116 8.600 1.837
(9) Macrozooplankton 3.6 0.311 10.0 33.0 0.95 0.303 0.505 3.046 6.154 0.495 1.020 9.800 4.258
(10) Macrobenthos 3.5 0.25 1.00 2.86 0.895 0.350 0.583 0.179 0.429 0.417 1.400 0.714 0.312
(11) Mesozooplankton 3.5 1.058 20.00 57.14 0.836 0.350 0.538 18.137 39.297 0.462 1.167 17.143 24.625
(12) Ciliates 2.8 0.167 88.00 247.89 0.927 0.355 0.507 14.282 28.978 0.493 1.029 85.521 13.485
(13) Heterotr. flagellates 2.3 0.307 292 829.55 0.932 0.352 0.503 88.625 178.269 0.497 1.011 288.682 82.288
(14) Meiobenthos 3.3 0.1 10.00 32.26 0.859 0.310 0.443 1.258 2.258 0.557 0.795 12.581 1.108
(15) Bacteria (column) 2.0 0.598 87.40 383.33 0.975 0.228 0.289 128.829 183.094 0.711 0.406 215.433 49.470
(16) Bacteria (sediment) 2.0 1.5 2.508 8.36 0.80 0.300 0.375 6.270 10.032 0.625 0.600 4.180 3.261
(17) Phytoplankton 1.0 1.253 248 0.769 61.409
(18) Detritus (column) 1.0 572 0.963 8.781
(19) Detritus (sediment) 1.0 433 0.931 0.000
Catch, biomass (B), production (P), respiration (R), assimilation (A), and flow to detritus in terms of g C m� 2 year� 1. P/B, Q/B, R/B year� 1. EE, P/Q, net efficiency
(P/A), R/A, and P/R are dimensionless.
J.M.Bradford-G
rieveet
al./J.
Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol.289(2003)223–262
230
of this problem appeared to be that phytoplankton production relative to biomass (P/B), as
calculated from a limited set of original data, was not great enough to support the biomass
that immediately depended on it, as defined in the model. Therefore we chose a value for
primary production that was defined in proportion to bacterial production based on the
conclusions of Ducklow (2000).
Detritus derived from intertidal primary producers (macroalgae) was not taken into
account in the model although it will be important locally around the islands on the
Southern Plateau. Macroalgae can make a direct input to the deep sediment (Reichardt,
1987) but of most interest is the production of fine particulate detrital material and DOC
into the water column (Mazure and Field, 1980 and references therein). Kelp beds may be
highly productive with their productivity per unit area often being greater than the
phytoplankton by a factor of 10 (Mann, 1973). The particles remain suspended in the
water for a time and are acted on by bacteria (Laycock, 1974). Mazure and Field (1980)
estimate that the total amount of carbon available to suspension-feeders from kelp plants in
the Benguela current kelp beds may be in the order of 1200–1600 g C m� 2 year� 1. It is
likely that subantarctic algae do not produce as much detritus as this, but as yet no data are
available on which to evaluate their contribution to this system.
Initially we did not believe that annual P/B for sediment bacteria was as low as
experimental data suggested and chose a literature-derived value of 11. The model
produced a very low ecotrophic efficiency for bacteria so it was decided to let the model
calculate P/B by assuming an ecotrophic efficiency of 0.8 and P/Q of 0.3. The
subsequently calculated annual P/B for sediment bacteria of 2.5 is nearer the experimen-
tally derived P/B of 1 than the literature value of 11.
Slight changes in the diet of some compartments (Table 1) reduced the ecotrophic
efficiencies of their prey to < 1.
Initially there was not enough material flowing to the detritus compartments. Changes
in the ratio of unassimilated food/food consumption corrected this. Final balancing was
achieved by choosing relatively high production/consumption ratios for ciliates, hetero-
trophic flagellates, and meiobenthos (Table 3).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Evaluation of data
A summary of all the final input data and the calculated parameters is found in Table 3.
Although we have detailed data available for subantarctic water just north of the
Plateau, we do not know if these data are representative of the Plateau itself. Also, a
number of the parameters were estimated from literature values. The absence of data on
production/biomass ratios and quantitative food consumption in relation to biomass for
commercial fish species on the Plateau was particularly conspicuous. Our knowledge of
annual and interannual variability on the Plateau is very limited therefore our estimation of
annual averages has to be considered approximate.
The primary production figure used in the model is probably overestimated. Boyd et
al. (unpublished manuscript) compare in situ primary productivity measurements and
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 231
primary production estimated from SeaWiFS data and the algorithm of Behrenfeld and
Falkowski (1997). This method was modified for New Zealand waters using sea surface
temperature data from AVHRR and local optical spectral attenuation data. This
technique showed a robust relationship between the measured and estimated data and
gave an annual production of 142.5 g C m� 2 year� 1 for a box which takes in most, but
not all, of the Southern Plateau region (Murphy et al., 2001). This means that the
localised high chlorophyll a in the vicinity of the Auckland Islands (>1 mg m� 3) and
the calculated column integrated primary production of 2–2.5 g C m� 2 day� 1 are not
included in the above estimate of average annual primary production for the Southern
Plateau. Thus, although average annual primary production is likely to be greater than
142.5 g C m� 2 year� 1, it is probably not as great as the 265 g C m� 2 year� 1 use in the
model.
The model was balanced by using what may be unrealistically high P/Q ratios for some
compartments (ciliates: 0.355; heterotrophic flagellates: 0.352; macrobenthos: 0.35;
meiobenthos: 0.31). Total daily consumption/biomass for microzooplankton is estimated
from a limited set of dilution experiments at 10 m for microzooplankton grazing on < 200
Am phytoplankton, ciliates grazing on heterotrophic flagellates, and heterotrophic flag-
ellates grazing on bacteria (J.H., unpublished data). These data were converted to an
annual basis and the P/Q ratio determined using a P/B of 220. The P/Q values average
0.242 for ciliates and heterotrophic flagellates combined. This is less than the 0.35 used in
the model for ciliates and heterotrophic flagellates but may be justified on the grounds that
the above experimental estimate is from water at 10 m and probably does not reflect the
average situation down the water column.
Experimental data on the iron-limited system of the North Pacific suggests that this
particular nutrient limitation impacts a number of ecological parameters. P/Q for
heterotrophic bacteria (Tortell et al., 1966) was 0.12–0.36 in iron-deficient conditions
and for heterotrophic marine microflagellates (Chase and Price, 1997) was 0.18. In the
model, P/Q for water column bacteria (0.228) fits within these values and the range of
experimentally derived values, whereas P/Q for microzooplankton is less than the P/Q
used here (0.352).
Total consumption by microzooplankton in the NE Pacific of bacteria is greater than
that on phytoplankton (58% and 26% of the total ration, respectively) (Rivkin et al.,
1999). Data from Hall et al. (1999) and Bradford-Grieve et al. (1997) suggest that bacteria
and picophytoplankton each make up about 50% of the total ration of heterotrophic
flagellates. Nevertheless, the model could be balanced only with 20% of heterotrophic
flagellates diet being made up of bacteria. The reason for this may be located in the
possible underestimation of water column bacterial biomass. It was established that
bacterial P/B and B are more important than the substrate for bacterial growth in
determining the availability of bacteria to heterotrophic flagellates. That is, importing
detritus from macroalgae does not make a difference to the carrying capacity of the
pelagic system as defined.
For some parameters we have direct measurements. For example, the input of carbon
sedimented to the seafloor (1.23 g C m� 2 year� 1) is less than the 8.8 g C m� 2 year� 1
that the model sends to the seafloor to fuel the activities of the bacteria, meiobenthos, and
macrobenthos. This could be a result of overestimating their biomasses through using data
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262232
from the south side of Chatham Rise. Further data are needed to decide whether the
current choice of parameter values for the Southern Plateau region is a serious flaw in the
model.
There was a discrepancy between measured annual P/B for sediment bacteria of 1 and
literature values of about 11. The model calculates that P/B for sediment bacteria of 2.5 is
all that is necessary to satisfy the demand of the benthic system, implying that the
measured P/B for sediment bacteria is not as unrealistic as initially thought.
Many of the other parameter estimates appear to be reasonable. The gross efficiencies
(GE or P/Q) invertebrates are between 0.3 and 0.36 are at the high end of the range
reported in the literature (e.g. Parsons et al., 1984 [K1 (as %) in Table 25]). The P/Q for
mesopelagic fish appears to be very low and is the result of the particular choice of P/B
and Q/B for this compartment. The production/respiration ratios (P/R) are more or less
as expected for those groups of organisms where there are data (Humphrey, 1979). In
other groups, P/R seems high at about 1 but this may not be surprising given the
variability in Humphrey’s (1979) data. It is possible that in this model not enough
energy from food consumption is set aside for respiration and that P/B and/or the
proportion of food that is unassimilated are too high in a number of groups. There is
evidence that this tightly coupled ecosystem may not always be able to support all
animals at optimal food consumption and growth. Since we are assuming optimum
growth in selecting production and food consumption parameters, this may be the reason
that in the model there is not enough energy for respiration. Evidence for this is seen in
the data on growth of the 1991 year class of southern blue whiting (Fig. 3). Larvae of
this species survived in particularly large numbers in 1991. Subsequently, they grew
slower than some previous year classes, suggesting that, in this model, lower P/B and Q/
B would have to have been assigned to reflect the true state of affairs. The low
respiration/biomass for mesozooplankton may be partly accounted for by the fact that
one of the large calanoid copepods in this system (Neocalanus tonsus) spends from late
January/February until September below 500 m where it enters a type of diapause
(Ohman, 1987).
The model calculates that there is 0.31 g C m� 2 of macrozooplankton. This is
converted to 0.99 g DW m� 2 using the relationship given by Weibe (1988). This
concentration is within the range of biomass values given by Pakhomov et al. (1994,
1996) for subantarctic open water of 0.01–4.4 g DW m� 2 and around islands of 0.01–
Fig. 3. Weight at age by cohort for 1987 and 1991 year classes of southern blue whiting (S.H., unpublished data).
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 233
2.86 g DW m� 2. The biomass of mesopelagic fish, calculated by the model (0.29 g C
m� 2) for the Southern Plateau, is 30% more than the micronekton biomass of 0.22 g C
m� 2 on the mid-slope region off southern Tasmania, Australia (Williams and Koslow,
1997), north of the Subtropical Front.
3.2. Biomass, consumption, and production
Omitting the large predators (birds, seals, whales), the pelagic domain contains 69% of
total living biomass and benthic compartments (including 0.07 g C m� 2 demersally
feeding fish (16% of biomass)) contain 31%. The benthic compartments account for food
intake of 16.67 g C m� 2 year� 1 which is < 3% of total non-detrital consumption.
Heterotrophic flagellates had the greatest food intake (255 g C m� 2 year� 1) followed
by water column bacteria (229 g C m� 2 year� 1), mesozooplankton (60 g C m� 2 year� 1),
and ciliates (41 g C m� 2 year� 1). In our model, bacteria (sediment plus water column)
utilise 52 g C m� 2 year� 1 of detritus of which 94% is derived from water column
processes. Twenty six percent of water column detritus is derived directly from phyto-
plankton.
The fish compartments (adult fish, juvenile fish) represent about 9% of total biomass
and account for about 1.43 g C m� 2 year� 1 of food intake. Fish and squid catches are at
the trophic levels of 4.8 and 5.0, respectively (Table 3).
According to model results, a significant proportion (56%) of primary production and
water column heterotrophic production is not directly used but enters the detritus pool that
is used by water column and sediment bacteria. The Southern Plateau retains 69% of the
biomass in the pelagic system but 99% of total production. Although fish are caught
demersally, most of their food is part of production in the pelagic system.
The small proportion of fish depending on the benthos for food appears to agree with
conclusions of other bathyal habitats. Haedrich and Merrett (1992) determine that only
13% of fish species in the Porcupine Seabight depend on benthos for food, and a number
of other studies show that slope fish species feed on the mesopelagic fauna (Mauchline and
Gordon, 1984, 1986, 1991; Sedberry and Musick, 1978; Marshall, 1979; Gordon and
Mauchline, 1990). Blaber and Bulman (1987) also show that fish of the eastern Tasmanian
slope (420–550 m) depend on mesopelagic fish resources.
Top predators represent about 0.26% of total biomass and account for about 0.24 g C
m� 2 year� 1 of food consumed made up of birds 0.058 g C m� 2 year� 1, seals 0.041 g C
m� 2 year� 1, and toothed 0.094 g C m� 2 year� 1 and baleen whales 0.051 g C m� 2
year� 1. This amounts to 105,803 tonnes carbon over the whole of the Southern Plateau
and is about 17% of the total amount of food (621,399 tonnes of carbon) eaten by fish
(non-mesopelagic).
The fact that fisheries discards have been directed to ‘‘detritus’’ in the model gives an
erroneous picture of the impact of fishing on the food of some sea birds that tend to
congregate around fishing vessels. Nevertheless, of the estimated >10 million sea birds
that live in the area (D.T., unpublished data), only a small fraction benefits from the
presence of fishing vessels. Therefore, the omission of discards from the food of seabirds
is considered to be immaterial to the functioning of the ecosystem as a whole and birds in
particular.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262234
The partitioning of total adult fish production in the model among those compartments
utilising it (Fig. 4) shows that fisheries take the greatest proportion (32%). The remaining
proportions are 7% consumed by seals, 21% by toothed whales, 13% by other adult fish,
20% by squid, with 7% dying of other causes (give the steady state assumptions). These
proportions do not necessarily absolutely represent the Southern Plateau system but give a
picture of what might be occurring. It would be instructive to know the fate of production
of the most important fish species, but this would require the collection of data specific to
New Zealand’s fish species and that biomasses, production, and consumption information
on the major predators would have to be estimated more accurately.
3.3. Transfer efficiency
Ecosystem components can be grouped into discrete trophic levels and transfer
efficiencies estimated (Lindeman, 1942). Transfer efficiency is the fraction of total flows
at each trophic level (throughput) that are either exported or transferred to another trophic
level through consumption. Transfer efficiencies are greater at the beginning of the food
web compared with higher trophic levels because of intrinsic differences in metabolic
characteristics of organisms at different levels in the food web (e.g. R/A and P/R in Table
3). Transfer efficiencies in the Southern Plateau ecosystem (Table 4) are at the high end of
the range reported in the literature (e.g. Parsons et al., 1984). They are higher than the
Table 4
Transfer efficiencies (the proportion of energy transferred from one trophic level to the next) for each trophic level
Source/trophic level I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX
Producer – 25.8 22.8 19.2 14.4 8.3 4.9
Detritus – 22.3 24.5 23.6 19.2 14.9 8.4 5.0
All flows – 23.9 23.7 21.5 17.2 12.6 7.0 4.6 1.5
Proportion of total flow originating from detritus: 0.51.
Transfer efficiencies (calculated as geometric mean for TL II– IV): from primary producers, 22.4%; from detritus,
23.5%; total, 23.0%.
Fig. 4. Partitioning of adult fish production amongst those compartments consuming it.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 235
upper end of average values (8–15%) reported by Christensen and Pauly (1993), Wolff
(1994), and Wolff et al. (1996).
3.4. Mixed trophic impacts
Direct and indirect interactions within the food web can be evaluated by changing the
biomass of a group and assessing the effect this change will have on other groups in the
system assuming the trophic structure remains the same (Fig. 5). The mixed trophic impact
(MTI) (scaled � 1 to + 1) for each group is calculated using the approach in Ecopath with
Ecosim (Christensen et al., 2000) which is based on the work of Ulanowicz and Puccia
(1990).
In the model, a small increase in the biomass of top predators (birds, seals, toothed
whales, adult fish) all have a negative impact on the biomass of their preferred prey, but it
is the adult fish that have the greatest impact on their prey (apart from macrozooplankton)
and also negatively impact birds and seals as they are directly competing for resources. All
compartments have a negative effect on themselves probably reflecting competition for
resources. An increase in phytoplankton biomass positively impacts most other compart-
ments apart from itself and water column bacteria which are the prey of heterotrophic
flagellates whose biomass is increased by the increase in phytoplankton biomass. An
increase in the biomass of mesozooplankton has the greatest number of positive impacts
on other compartments ranging from small to moderate. Of these impacts, it appears that
the increase in macrozooplankton biomass has the greatest (nevertheless small) impact on
adult fish biomass. An increase in adult fish has a large negative impact on birds, seals,
presumably because of competition for food.
The greatest impact is noted on bird and seal biomass if the fishing fleet is increased
and the resulting accidental bycatch and competition of the fisheries for the food of birds
and seals, as portrayed in the model, is increased. It is also noted that an increase in the
fishing fleet has a positive impact on mesopelagic fish and macrobenthos that make up the
food of fish. These changes cannot be interpreted as predictions as the model, as used,
does not accommodate changes in diet composition that would result. Also, if we were to
identify the exact diets of birds, seals, and individual species of fish in the fishery in more
detail, we might find that there is not the degree of competition for the same food that the
model currently implies.
3.5. Summary statistics
The total throughput (the sum of all flows: consumption, exports, respiratory flows, and
flows to detritus) at each trophic level is 1136 g C m� 2 year� 1 (Table 5), which is low and
similar to throughput within the Golfo Dulce (Wolff et al., 1996). About 97% of
throughput is achieved from trophic levels I to III: 50% from levels I to II plus 38%
from levels II–III. About 54% of the total is due to consumption, < 0.1% is exported
(sedimentation and fishery), 22% flows into detritus, and 23% is respired (Fig. 6).
The total primary production/respiration (P/R) ratio calculated by the model is 1.004
(Table 5), which is similar to estimates obtained from in situ primary production and
plankton respiration data (P/R = 0.9–1.2, see Wolff et al., 1996). That is, the Southern
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262236
Fig. 5. Mixed trophic impacts (MTIi, j=DCi, j� FCi, j) on the Southern Plateau (where DC is diet composition, FC
is a host composition term giving the proportion of the predation on j that is due to i as predator). Direct and
indirect impacts of a small increase in the biomass of each of the impacting groups (vertical axis) on every other
group (horizontal axis) are shown. Positive impacts are shown above the line, negative below. Impacts are relative
and comparable between groups.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 237
Plateau lies within the range of open ocean systems where productivity and respiration
tends to be balanced (P/R = 1 Christensen and Pauly, 1993) and where primary production
is comparatively low. The system biomass of 6.219 g C m� 2 is very low compared with
the 41 trophic models presented by Christensen and Pauly (1993) and Wolff (1994), and
even lower than in a tropical fjord-like embayment (Wolff et al., 1996).
An ecosystem picture emerges in which energy fluxes, and to a lesser extent biomass, is
concentrated in the pelagic environment. The mean level of fisheries (4.5) is similar to that
found in the tropical Golfo Dulce (Costa Rica) (5.3) and reflects the fact that the Southern
Table 5
Summary statistics for the Southern Plateau ecosystem model
Parameter Value Units Comment
Sum of all consumption 610 g C m� 2 year� 1
Sum of all exports 0.971 g C m� 2 year� 1 sediment and fishery
Sum of all respiration flows 264 g C m� 2 year� 1
Sum of all flows into detritus 251 g C m� 2 year� 1
Total system throughput 1136 g C m� 2 year� 1
Sum of all production 451 g C m� 2 year� 1
Fishery’s mean trophic level 4.48
Its gross efficiency (catch/primary production) 0.000181
Calculated total net primary production 265 g C m� 2 year� 1
Total primary production/total respiration 1.004
Total biomass/total throughput 0.005
Total biomass (excluding detritus) 6.219 g C m� 2
Total catches 0.048 g C m� 2 year� 1
Throughput cycled (excluding detritus) 35.28 g C m� 2 year� 1
Finn’s cycling index 19.75 % of total throughput
Average path length 5.79
Fig. 6. Partitioning of throughput in the system among consumption by predators, exports, flows to detritus, and
respiration.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262238
Plateau fishery targets predatory fish feeding mainly on prey dependant on the pelagic
system, which is itself oligotrophic in nature because of iron limitation and dominated by
microbial processes. The very low gross efficiency of the fishery (catch/primary produc-
tivity) (0.018%) (Table 5) shows most of the system’s production, which occurs in the
pelagic part of the system, is not harvested in this particular part of the New Zealand EEZ
but is going to sustain the system as a whole.
Another feature of this type of system should be kept in mind. Fish production should
become increasingly sensitive to variations in primary production as primary production
decreases (Iverson, 1990). Iverson calculates that F 20% variation in annual phytoplank-
ton production could result in F 24% variation of fish production at 250 g C m� 2 year� 1
primary production, whereas at 50 g C m� 2 year� 1 primary production, there would be a
F 74% variation in fish production. He concludes that ‘‘the effects of interannual
variations in phytoplankton production on fish production should result in more difficult
fisheries management in environments with low phytoplankton production values’’. The
truth of this generalisation needs to be further investigated for the Southern Plateau as this
region plays an important part in the life cycle of hoki. It is possible that the condition of
hoki adults that go to breed off the west coast of South Island may be directly impacted by
variations in primary productivity or competition for food among elements of the
ecosystem over the Plateau and, as noted above, there is recent evidence of food limitation
of the growth of southern blue whiting in this system.
By definition, the Southern Plateau system is high on the ‘‘maturity’’ scale as we have
assumed steady state and there is no biomass accumulation, i.e. P/R = 1.0 (Odum, 1971). A
high mean total transfer efficiency of 23% exceeds that of any of the systems reported by
Christensen and Pauly (1993). Han (1997) considers that total system standing stock
(TSS)/total system throughput (TST) is the best measure of system structure and state. In
the Southern Plateau system, this ratio is 0.006 year� 1 which is even lower than the Golfo
Dulce (Wolff et al., 1996) and suggests this ecosystem, as modelled, is highly complex
compared with other systems that have been modelled (Table 6). The degree of energy
cycling (assumed to increase as systems ‘‘mature’’ (Odum, 1971)) compared with the 41
systems reported by Christensen and Pauly (1993) shows that Southern Plateau is
intermediate to high (Finn’s cycling index (FCI) = 19.75%; average path length = 5.79).
Nevertheless, these conclusions may be partly an artefact of the detail with which the
zooplankton and microbial system has been described in the present model, as other
Ecopath models referred to here, divide the fish compartment but tend to aggregate the
zooplankton and microbial compartments.
3.6. Sensitivity analysis
The sensitivity analysis routine was used to explore the sensitivity of the model to the
input parameters used in the model. Input parameters are varied in the routine independ-
ently in steps of 10% from � 50% to + 50% of the mean estimates used as input to the
model. Altering input parameters of a group often has large effects on the output
parameters of that group. As expected, changing biomass of most groups, usually by
� 20% or + 30%, had a >20% impact on ecotrophic efficiencies (EEs) of the same groups
(except toothed and baleen whales, mesopelagic fish, macrozoopolankton). Changing P/B
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 239
Table 6
Ecosystem maturity statistics
Ecosystem TSS
(g C m� 2)
TST
(g C m� 2 year� 1)
TSS/TST
(year� 1)
FCI
(%)
Average
path
length
Fishery
mean
trophic
level
Gross
efficiency
fishery
(%)
Average
transfer
efficiency
levels
II– IV
Reference
Southern Plateau, NZ 6.22 1136 0.006 19.8 5.79 4.84 0.02 23.0 This study
Golfo Dulce, Costa Rica 10.43 1405 0.007 18.9 3.37 Wolff et al., 1996
Tongoy Bay, Chile 236.3 20,835 0.011 10.1 4.91 3.6 0.89 13.0 Wolff, 1994
Venuzuela shelf 122.10 7621 0.016 1.6 – – – – Mendoza, 1993
Weddell Sea, Antarctica 16.9 261 0.065 18.8 3.5 – – – Jarre-Teichmann et al., 1997
South Benguela, 1989 36.0 2332.7 0.015 – 3.19 3.48 – 10.6 Jarre-Teichmann et al., 1998
South Benguela, 1995–1999 56.6 2081.8 0.027 – 2.78 3.66 0.04 27.4 Jarre-Teichmann et al., 1998
TSS= total system standing stock (biomass); TST= total system throughput; FCI = Finn’s cycling index; gross efficiency of fishery = catch/primary production.
J.M.Bradford-G
rieveet
al./J.
Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol.289(2003)223–262
240
of most groups by � 20% or + 30% had a >20% effect on the EEs of the same groups
(except for toothed and baleen whales).
The largest impacts of one group on another are seen when relatively low percentage
changes (F 20%) in input parameters of adult and juvenile fish, squid, mesopelagic fish,
macrozooplankton, macrobenthos, ciliates, heterotrophic flagellates, and bacteria are
made. Among the groups impacted by >20%, apart from themselves, are mesopelagic
fish, macrobenthos, macrozooplankton, ciliates, and phytoplankton which are the most
sensitive groups that are impacted by a 20% or 30% change in specific parameters of the
impacting group.
3.7. Limitations and strengths of the approach
How representative of the Southern Plateau ecosystem is this model? At best it can be
seen as preliminary as a number of the parameters were estimated from literature values or
were derived from data collected north of the study region. The fact that the model could
be balanced only by using relatively high P/Q ratios may be a true characteristic of the
subantarctic system. For example, Ohman and Runge (1994) hinted that a calanoid
copepod (Calanus finmarchicus) may need to consume less food when feeding on
microzooplankon compared with the same species feeding on phytoplankton.
All of the gaps in our knowledge of the Southern Plateau ecosystem, identified in the
discussion and in Appendix A, suggest priorities for further work to quantify these
parameters for the Southern Plateau region especially in the area of obtaining production,
food, and respiration characteristics for New Zealand’s major fisheries species.
The assumption of steady state for this system may have caused some of the difficulties
in balancing this model. There is interannual variability in surface chlorophyll a in the
Southern Plateau region (Murphy et al., 2001). Therefore, there is likely to be similar
interannual variability in primary production, perhaps evidenced by variable recruitment to
the southern blue whiting fishery (Hanchet et al., 1998) and less than optimal growth of
the 1991 year class of southern blue whiting that survived in particularly large numbers
(Fig. 3). Because the data used here have been collected in different years, we may be
getting only a general picture.
Nevertheless, we are confident the model reflects the general characteristics of this
system. That is, being a low primary production system dominated by the microbial loop
and with low sedimentation to the seafloor, it is a system with high transfer efficiencies
that supports a range of trophic levels and high-level predators.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Foundation for Research Science and Technology, New
Zealand, Contract No. CO1214. We thank Dr. Helen Neil, Dr. Rosie Hurst, and Marieke
van Kooten, all of NIWA, and Dr. W. Balzer, University of Bremen, Germany, for
providing as yet unpublished data that is acknowledged in the text. The authors are also
grateful to Dr. Lynne Shannon, of Marine and Coastal Management, South Africa, for
sharing her knowledge and experience of this type of modelling. [RW]
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 241
Appendix A. Input data
A.1. Birds
Biomass data were collated on the populations of the 11 most common seabird
species (Diomedea antipodensis, Diomedea gibsoni, Diomedea epomophora, Thalas-
sarche impavida, Thalassarche steadi, Thalassarche salvini, Puffinus griseus, Procel-
laria aequinoctalis, Pachyptila desolata, Pterodroma lessonii, Eudyptes sclateri) that
breed on the Bounty/Campbell Plateau (Robertson and Bell, 1984; Gales, 1998; Taylor,
2000), their wet body weights (Marchant and Higgins, 1990), months of residence in the
area (Marchant and Higgins, 1990), and breeding success (data cited in Marchant and
Higgins, 1990). It is assumed that the minor species make a negligible contribution to
seabird biomass. It is also assumed that the populations of smaller sea birds breeding in
the Bounty/Campbell Plateau region also feed there. We do not have the data to decide
how reasonable these assumptions are. It is known that some large species feed outside
the region (e.g. Walker, 1995; Waugh et al., 2000). We assume that 10% of wet weight
is carbon, based on the data for fish (Vinogradov, 1953). Thus the mean annual biomass
of seabirds is assumed to be 0.00158 g C m� 2. Production to biomass ratios were
calculated by using available data on chick maximum weight, number of months to
attain this weight, breeding success, number of breeding pairs, and total population
biomass. An upper bound to annual P/B was calculated from: [(no. of breeding
pairs� no. of eggs laid�maximum chick weight)/total biomass of population]/(no.
of months to maximum weight if over 12 months/12). A lower bound to annual P/B
was calculated from: [(no. of breeding pairs� no. of eggs laid� breeding success�maximum chick weight)/total biomass of population]/(no. of months to maximum
weight if over 12 months/12). A P/B of 0.30 year� 1 is used although Crawford et al.
(1991) use 0.2 year� 1 for southwest African seabirds and Wolff (1994) uses 0.07 year� 1
for northern Chile seabirds.
Annual consumption to biomass ratios were calculated from available data on food
requirements in the literature (e.g. Woehler and Green, 1992) and by calculating the
standard metabolic rate, multiplying it by 2.5, and converting to units of carbon (Schneider
and Hunt, 1982). A Q/B of 36.5 year� 1 is used in the model. Consumption may also be
calculated from the relationship of Nagy (1987): C = 0.495M0.704, where C is daily
consumption in dry grams and M is body mass in grams. A Q/B of 62 year� 1 was used
by Wolff (1994) for northern Chile sea birds, therefore further work probably needs to be
done on the food requirements of New Zealand sea birds. The diet of seabirds is estimated
to be composed of squid, mesopelagic fish, and macrozooplankton, and juvenile fish.
Cherel et al. (1999) show that albatrosses during chick rearing prey on southern blue
whiting juveniles that are 4–5 months old.
Birds have been incidentally killed by fisheries activities on the Southern Plateau.
Bartle (1991) estimated that 1140 white-capped albatrosses were killed during the 1990
southern squid trawl fishery. The main agent of these deaths was the net monitor cable the
use of which was banned in 1992. Grey petrels have also been killed as part of the ling
long-line fishery on the Pukaki Rise. Estimates of bird deaths due to fishing activities have
been made recently for the Auckland Island squid trawl fishery at 38 birds (c.v. = 30%)
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262242
(Baird, 1999) and 82 birds were killed in the squid fisheries for 1999–2000 (Buller’s,
Campbell, and white-capped albatrosses, grey and white-chinned petrels, sooty shear-
water, cape pigeon and diving pigeon); about 4% or trawls capture seabirds (Baird, in
press). In the absence of consistently collected data, annual fishing related mortalities of
birds are estimated here to be between 4560 kg WW of white-capped albatrosses or 38 kg
WW of, for example, grey petrels (or 456 or 3.8 kg C). On a per square meter basis over
the whole of the Southern Plateau, these mortalities are 1.05� 10� 6 or 8.76� 10� 9 g C
m� 2 year� 1. In the model, we use the greater value to estimate the potential impact of
fishing on the sea bird populations.
A.2. Seals and sea lions
The New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) is found on Auckland, Campbell,
Bounty, and Antipodes Islands on the Southern Plateau where they are non-migratory
stocks of a total of about 9600 individuals (Wilson, 1974; Crawley and Warneke,
1979). Adult males weigh 120–185 kg and adult females 40–70 kg (Crawley and
Warneke, 1979). Assuming a 50:50 sex ratio and using a median weight for males and
females, then the average annual wet biomass is 998.4 tonnes. Assuming that these
mammals have the same carbon content as fish (10% of wet weight), the total carbon
biomass is 99.8 tonnes or 0.0002 g C m� 2. This species eats barracouta, cephalopods,
and small fish (Street, 1964). Although southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina)
have been seen in the New Zealand region, it is assumed that they are not a regular
part of the Southern Plateau ecosystem. Their P/B and Q/B ratios are given by Laws
(1984, Table III).
Hooker’s sea lion (Phocarctos hookeri) is New Zealand’s only endemic seal. Males
weigh about 350 kg and females 110 kg (Gales, 1995), and the total population on the
Auckland and Campbell Islands is probably about 12,500 (Gales and Fletcher, 1999),
although in a recent disease event during January and February 1998, approximately
60% of the sea lion pups and an unknown number of adults died over a 30-day period
on Enderby and Dundas Islands (Baker, 1999). Assuming a 50:50 sex ratio and using a
median weight for males and females, the average annual wet biomass is 2875 tonnes.
Assuming that these mammals have the same carbon content as fish (10% of wet
weight), the total carbon biomass is 288 tonnes or 0.00066 g C m� 2. This species
appears to feed on the bottom and eats cephalopods, crustaceans, and fish and has been
know to eat penguins (Gales and Mattlin, 1997; Childerhouse et al., 2001). The total
average annual seal biomass is therefore estimated to be 0.0009 g C m� 2. Using the
data of (Laws, 1984, Table VIII) and assuming that mortality equals production in a
stable population, then the average P/B for Antarctic seals is about 0.22 year� 1 which
is used here. Annual food consumption in relation to biomass (Q/B) averages 46 year� 1
assuming a daily food intake of 10% of body weight, the upper food intake for captive
animals (Laws 1984); this value is used in the model. Similar values (54 and 47
year� 1) are obtained for fur and Hooker’s seals, respectively, if the equation of Nagy
(1987) for all eutherian mammals is used: C = 0.235M0.822, where C is the daily food
consumed in g DW and M is the wet mass of the animal in g. Jarre-Teichmann et al.
(1998) estimate that Cape fur seals have a Q/B ratio of 19.3 year� 1 and a P/B ratio of
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 243
0.95 year� 1 although the former seems too low and the latter too high. The diet of seals
and sea lions is assumed to be composed of squid, and mesopelagic and large fish
(Street, 1964).
In the Bounty/Campbell Plateau region, Hooker’s sea lion are caught incidentally
around the Auckland Islands in the southern squid trawl fishery and New Zealand fur seal
are caught around the Bounty Islands in the southern blue whiting fishery (Baird, 1996,
1997, 1999; Baird et al., 1999; Doonan, 1999). The estimated numbers caught in each
fishery have been averaged over the years that estimates have been made based on
observer data. Therefore an average of 71 Hooker’s sea lions were caught annually from
1988 to 1999 and 119 New Zealand fur seals were caught annually from 1993 to 1998.
This export represents 6.6� 10� 6 g C m� 2.
A.3. Toothed whales and dolphins
There are a number of species of toothed whales and dolphins known to have the
Southern Plateau in their living range (e.g. Gaskin, 1982; Baker, 1990): Arnoux’s
beaked whale (Berardius arnuxii), southern bottlenose whale (Hyperoodon planifrons),
hourglass dolphin (Lagenorhynchus cruciger), Andrew’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon
bowdoini), straptoothed beaked whale (Mesoplodon layardii), spectacled porpoise
(Phocoena dioptrica), goosebeak whale (Ziphius cavirostris), southern rightwhale
dolphin (Lissodelphus peronii), and sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus). Estimates
have been made of beaked whales (mostly southern bottlenosed whale), but also
including Arnoux’s beaked whale (450,000–800,000 individuals), the hourglass dolphin
(100,000–200,000 individuals) south of 50jS (although these species are distributed
north of this latitude so these are underestimates), and sperm whale south of 30j(128,000–290,000 individuals) (Kasamatsu and Joyce, 1995). Sperm whales are known
to migrate, so their average annual biomass in the Southern Plateau region is estimated
in the following paragraph.
The Southern Plateau extends over 8j of latitude and 16j of longitude. Humpback
whales migrate southwards in spring at an average speed of 15j per month (Brown and
Lockyer, 1984). If we assume that all whales migrate at the same speed through the
region, then the Southern Plateau would be passed in 16 days for a one-way journey
and 32 days for a return journey. Thus, the average annual biomass is calculated based
on 32 days residence. If we assume that whales are evenly distributed with longitude in
the Southern Ocean and that the proportion of the total population that migrates through
the Southern Plateau region is proportional to the longitudinal spread of the plateau
relative to the total extent of the Southern Ocean, then we can calculate an average
annual whale biomass that passes through the Southern Plateau region (16j as a
proportion of 320j, the estimated longitudinal extent of the Southern Ocean) for 32
days by multiplying total whale biomass by 0.0044. Therefore the annual average
biomass of sperm whales is estimated to be 29,604 tonnes wet weight or 2960 tonnes C
or 0.0068 g C m� 2.
The biomass of the other species in the Southern Plateau region are not included. The
surveys of odontocete whales carried out between 1976 and 1988 in spring and summer
in Antarctic waters show that species known to occur occasionally over the plateau have
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262244
their main distributions south of 50jS in summer (Kasamatsu and Joyce, 1995). Little is
known of any migration patterns of these species. Therefore, we decided to increase the
average annual biomass of sperm whales by 25%, pending better population estimates of
other species known to occur in the Southern Plateau region. This gives a grand total
biomass of 0.0085 g C m� 2. P/B is calculated from the relationship of Banse and
Mosher (1980): log(P/B) = loga + blogMs, where Ms is in kcal, loga = 1.11, b =� 0.33.
[Note that K. Banse (personal communication) indicated that there is an error in his
Table 2 (Banse and Mosher, 1980): the column labelled a should be labelled loga.]
Whale wet weight is converted approximately to kcal by assuming that like fish, there
are 1000 cal g wet mass� 1 (Schindler et al., 1993). Therefore P/B is 0.042, 0.073,
0.088, and 0.288 year� 1 for an average sperm whale, Arnoux’s beaked whale, southern
bottlenosed whale, and hourglass dolphin, respectively. Therefore, we use a weighted
average of 0.06 year� 1.
Daily food requirements of sperm whales are calculated to be about 3% of body weight
(Brown and Lockyer, 1984) although in other species daily food consumption can vary
from 4% to 14% of body weight. Another method for calculating daily rations, based on
feeding rates of cetaceans in captivity (see Sigurjonsson and Vıkingsson, 1998), is
I = 0.42M0.67, where I is the ingestion rate (kg day� 1) and M is body weight in kg; this
equation gives similar values.
Here we assume that the food requirements dolphins is 4% of body weight. The Q/B
ratio of sperm whales is therefore assumed to be 11.0 and 14.6 year� 1 for hourglass
dolphins. The diet of beaked whales and dolphins is composed of fish (including
demersal fish) and squid (including giant squid) (Brown and Lockyer, 1984; Berzin,
1972).
A.4. Fish (adult)
The total (doorspread) biomass of fish caught on the Campbell Plateau estimated from
Tangaroa and Amatal Explorer surveys from 1989 to 1996 has been very consistent at
about 200,000 wet tonnes (Hurst and Schofield, 1995; O’Driscoll and Bagley, 2001).
Equivalent biomass estimates from two Shinkai Maru surveys during the early 1980s were
about 600,000 tonnes (Hatanaka et al., 1989). The difference appears to reflect differences
in fishing power between the two vessels. The catchability coefficient ( q), which can be
used to scale the estimate up to actual biomass, of most species, is unknown although
modelling suggests that for hoki it is about 0.1–0.15 for the Tangaroa, and 0.25 for the
Shinkai Maru. If a catchability of 0.1 is applied to all species, we get a total standing stock
of all species of about 2.5 million wet tonnes. This 2.5 million tonnes is made up of 1.8%
squid, 9.8% benthic feeders, and 88.4% pelagic feeders (based on proportions in Hurst and
Schofield, 1995).
The main species of fish that have been consistently caught commercially through the
period of data collection on the Bounty/Campbell Plateau are hoki (Macruronus
novaezelandiae), southern blue whiting (Micromesistius australis), hake (Merluccius
australis), ling (Genypterus blacodes), orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), javelin
fish and rattails (e.g. Hurst and Schofield, 1995), although more than 78 species are
found on the plateau (Anderson et al., 1998). Of these, hake, hoki, ling, and southern
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 245
blue whiting are among the quota species for which a Total Allowable Commercial
Catch has been set.
Hoki is the most important fish in the Southern Plateau fishery. The adult fish that
live on the Southern Plateau are part of the Western stock. These fish migrate to the
west coast of South Island to spawn and juvenile fish 2–4 years are found on the
Chatham Rise throughout the year (Annala et al., 2000). There is strong circumstantial
evidence that hoki recruit to the Southern Plateau from the Chatham Rise although the
size and timing of this recruitment is not known. For the purposes of this model, we
assume that there is a fairly steady biomass on the Southern Plateau that is substantially
altered only during the breading season (June to mid-September). In order to estimate
the annual average biomass, we take into account the fact that many adult hoki migrate
out of the area for 3 months (R. Hurst, personal communication) of the year to breed.
Estimations of the total biomass of adult fish (recruited fish z 55 cm) on the Bounty/
Campbell Plateau have been made in November–December 1991, 1992, and 1993
(Chatterton and Hanchet, 1994; Ingerson et al., 1995; Ingerson and Hanchet, 1995). The
mean total doorspread hoki biomass for 1991–1993 on the Bounty/Campbell Plateau
(data from strata 1–5 have been removed) is 77,467 tonnes. 99.8% of this is mature fish
z 55 cm. We assume that hoki biomass is 28.8% of the non-squid biomass of 2.455
million tonnes (see 300–1000 m summer biomass 1990; Hurst and Schofield, 1995).
About 707,040 tonnes of hoki lives on the Bounty/Campbell Plateau in summer.
705,626 tonnes (99.8%) are adult fish and 70% of this migrates to the west coast,
South Island, for 3 months in winter (Livingston et al., 1997). Therefore the average
annual total fish biomass is assumed to be 2,331,516 wet tonnes or 233,152 tonnes C or
0.5377 g C m� 2. In the next section, we calculate the proportion that represents juvenile
fish (0.086 g C m� 2). This is subtracted from the total fish biomass to give the non-
juvenile biomass of 0.4517 g C m� 2.
The annual catch is estimated from data on Quota Management species (Annala et al.,
1999). The average annual catch is about 172,700 wet tonnes (including catches of hoki on
the west coast of South Island where adults went to breed) to which we add an estimated
10% to account for the bycatch species which gives about 189,970 wet tonnes or 18,997
tonnes C or 0.0438 g C m� 2. To estimate total landings, the discards (see below) have
been subtracted to give 0.0430 g C m� 2.
It appears that a large proportion of fish biomass on the Bounty/Campbell Plateau
depends on planktonic food resources. The diet of 7 of the main commercial fish species
was analysed by Clark (1985). He found that hoki, southern blue whiting, and javelin
fish were plankton (water column) feeders, feeding mainly on natant decapods,
euphausiids, amphipods, and some mesopelagic fish. Other dietary information collected
during trawl surveys suggests that arrow squid, hoki, and southern blue whiting are
pelagic or semipelagic feeders with squid feeding on euphausiids, fish, and other squid
and ling feed mainly on other fish and are thought to bottom feeders (Hatanaka et al.,
1989). Using the relative biomass data given by Hurst and Schofield (1995, Table 7),
minus the squid, and the classification of feeding types given above, then 6–11% of fish
biomass (15 major species, rattails, and other quota species) is thought to depend on a
benthic source of food. The diet of hoki on the Campbell Plateau can be divided into
macrozooplankton (16%), mesopelagic fish (23%), fish (52%), and Cephalopoda (9%),
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262246
although this can vary considerably with season and location (Clark, 1985, Table 1).
Similarly the diet of southern blue whiting on the Campbell Plateau is 71% macro-
zooplankton and 14% mesopelagic fish, 11% fish, and 4% squid. The diet of javelin fish
is composed of 38% macrozooplankton, 8% mesopelagic fish, 5% fish, 46% Cepha-
lopoda, and 3% macrobenthos. Ling eat 4% macrozooplankton, 12% macrobenthos, and
83% fish, some of which are benthic feeders. Silverside ate mainly macrozooplankton—
salps (84.7%) and macrobenthos (7.4%). The group of fish that have more benthic
organisms in their diets do not feed exclusively on benthic organisms. Smooth rattail ate
17% macrozooplankton, 33% macrobenthos, and 50% fish. Small-scaled notothenid eat
27% macrozooplankton, 33% macrobenthos, and 39% fish. Therefore adult fish are
assumed to eat adult fish, juvenile fish, squid, mesopelagic fish, macrozooplankton, and
macrobenthos.
The annual food consumption/biomass is known only for orange roughy. Orange roughy
adults consume 1.15% of body weight per day and juveniles 0.91% of body weight
(Bulman and Koslow, 1992). Therefore Q/B is 4.2 year� 1 for adults or 3.2 year� 1 for
juveniles. Consumption/biomass is therefore calculated from the empirical relationship
given by Christensen et al. (2000): log(Q/B) = 7.964� 0.204logWl� 1.965T V + 0.083A +
0.532h + 0.398d, where Wl is asymptotic weight of fish (g), T V= 1000/mean habitat
temperature of fish (K), A is the aspect ratio of the caudal fin = h2/s (h is height of tail and s
is surface area of tail), and h and d are a dummy variables expressing food type (0 for
carnivores and detrivores or 1 for herbivores). Southern blue whiting maximum weight
(Wl) of a 60-cm fish is calculated from weight (g) = a� length (cm)b, where a = 0.00515
for females and 0.00407 for males, and b = 3.092 for females and 3.152 for males.
Therefore Wl is 1600 g for females and males. T V= 1000/(7 + 273.15) = 3.57, A= h2/s = 1.42. Therefore Q/B is 2.60 year� 1. The above equation does not apply to eel-like fish
(e.g. hoki, ling). Southern blue whiting is an intermediate-sized fish so its Q/B is used here
for the whole fish compartment.
Annual production/biomass ratios (P/B) for fish is calculated from the equations given
by Banse and Mosher (1980): P/B = aMsb or log(P/B) = loga + blogMs, where loga = 0.44
and b=� 0.26 when Ms is in kcal. The equation for fish is P/B = 2.75M� 0.26. loga = 0.38
when Ms is in g wet weight (Haedrich and Merrett, 1992) or P/B = 2.4M� 0.26. Using this
latter relationship, P/B for 970 g hoki is 0.40 year� 1, for a 90 g hoki is 0.74 year� 1, for
350 g ling is 0.52 year� 1, and for 860 g hake is 0.41 year� 1. Alternatively, by assuming,
in a steady state population, the rate of all mortality (natural and fishing) is equal to
production rate then from population estimates and catch data (Annala et al., 1999), P/B is
estimated at 0.32 year� 1 for southern blue whiting and 0.36 year� 1 for hoki. P/B for the
large fish compartment is set at 0.30 year� 1. Orange roughy P/B ratio has been calculated
to be 0.15 (Pankhurst and Conroy, 1987).
A.5. Discarded fish
Discarded fish are all fish, both target and non-target species that are returned to the sea
as a result of economic, legal, or personal consideration (Anderson et al., 2000). Factory
waste could also be added here, but, because most vessels do not now discard their waste,
this is not included. The calculation of average annual discards is made by using discard
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 247
ratios and the total catch of the target species (Anderson et al., 2000; Clark et al., 2000).
Discard ratios have been worked out for arrow squid (0.0171), ling (0.182), southern blue
whiting (0.0159), orange roughy (0.0366), hoki (0.0544), and oreos (0.0286).
A.6. Fish (juvenile)
Juvenile fish are placed in a separate compartment. The proportion of hoki juveniles
< 59 cm total length was on average about 2% by weight across of the total hoki
population in 1991–1993 (Livingston and Schofield, 1996). The proportion of southern
blue whiting juveniles varies widely from dominating the populations as they did in 1993
to forming 14% of the total population in 1995 (Hanchet et al., 1998). These two species
dominate the populations on the Southern Plateau and are fished in a proportion of
approximately 2:1 (southern blue whiting/hoki). Therefore we assume that the biomass of
juvenile fish in the total population is 0.086 g C m� 2. Young fish about 1–2 years old
have a considerably larger P/B (>0.70) than adult fish (using relationships given in
Appendix A.4). P/B of 1 is used. Q/B of 3 is used although a Q/B of 19 has been reported
for North Atlantic cod of 10 cm (Daan, 1973). We assume juvenile fish have a diet of
macrozooplankton and mesozooplankton.
A.7. Baleen whales
The populations assumed to be migrating through the Southern Plateau region are
mainly Eubalaena australis (right whale), Balaenoptera acutorostrata (minke whale),
Balaenoptera musculus (blue whale), Balaenoptera physalus (fin whale), Balaenoptera
borealis (sei whale), and Megaptera novaeangliae (humpback whale). All six species are
thought to breed in tropical, subtropical, or warm temperature waters in winter and feed in
polar or cold temperate waters in summer, with spring and autumn migrations between the
two regions (Brown and Lockyer, 1984). Although it is generally assumed that whales do
not feed on their migration from the Antarctic to the tropics, several species have been
directly observed to feed in the New Zealand region (A.B., unpublished data) if food is
available.
The average annual whale biomass of what passes through the Southern Plateau region
is calculated by the same method used for toothed whales. Therefore the average annual
biomass of baleen whales on the Southern Plateau is 401,170� 0.044 wet tonnes = 17,651
tonnes or 1765 tonnes C (assuming that carbon is 10% of wet weight) or 0.0040 g C m� 2.
Three to four percent of body weight is consumed daily (Brown and Lockyer, 1984 and
references therein) although very young whales have been observed to take up to 13% of
body weight per day. This gives a Q/B of 12.8. We assume that baleen whales eat
macrozooplankton, mesozooplankton, and mesopelagic fish. Production/biomass ratios (P/
B) for some mammals is calculated from the equations in Banse and Mosher (1980) as for
toothed whales. Therefore an 80-tonne blue whale (80� 106 kcal) has P/B of 0.032
year� 1, a 30-tonne humpback whale (30� 106 kcal) has P/B of 0.044 year� 1, a 45-tonne
fin whale (45� 106 kcal) has P/B of 0.038 year� 1, and a 10-tonne minke whale (10� 106
kcal) has P/B of 0.036 year� 1. Sakshaug et al. (1994) also estimate minke whales to have
a of P/B of 0.035. P/B for the whale compartment was set at 0.038 year� 1.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262248
A.8. Squid
The most common squids taken on the Bounty/Campbell Plateau are the warty squid
(Moroteuthis spp.) and arrow squid (Nototodarus sloani). Giant squid (Architeuthis) are
also found in waters 300–600 m deep in this region (Forch, 1998) but their biomass is
unknown. Because giant squid have not been included in squid biomass, the biomass of
this compartment is probably underestimated. A commercial fishery is based on Nototo-
darus sloani. Robertson et al. (1978) record it as part of the mesopelagic fauna. Squid
biomass appears to be about 1.8% of the ‘‘all species’’ biomass (see Hurst and Schofield,
1995, Table 7). Therefore the average annual wet weight biomass of squid is estimated to
be 45,000 wet tonnes. The carbon content of a squid from the Chatham Rise is assumed to
be 20% of wet weight. This is derived from an assumption that ash-free dry weight is
equivalent to the carbon content. Arrow squid dry weight is 22.5% of wet weight and ash
is 6.2% of dry weight (Vlieg, 1988). Vinogradov (1953) gives similar data for dry weight
of Cephalopoda ranging from 13% to 30% of wet weight and ash is 0.9–2.4% of wet
weight. If we assume that ash-free dry weight is equivalent to the carbon content, then the
average annual biomass of squid is 9000 tonnes C or 0.0204 g C m� 2. The annual catch of
squid in the Bounty/Campbell Plateau region was obtained for the years 1992/1993 to
1997/1998 from the Ministry of Fisheries (Trawl Catch, Effort and Processing Return data
and Catch, Effort and Landing Return data). Groomed data on Quota Management species
were compared with the data (Annala et al., 1999) and substitutions made where there was
substantial disagreement. The average annual catch is about 18,000 wet tonnes. Converted
to units of carbon, average annual catch is 0.0042 g C m� 2.
P/B ratios for gonatid squid in the Bering Sea are estimated to be 6.7 (Radchenko,
1992), for Sthenoteuthis pteropus in the tropical Atlantic to be 8.0–8.5 (Laptikhovskij,
1995), and for captive Illex illecebrosus measured to be 2.9–9.1 at 7 jC (Hirtle et al.,
1981). Therefore annual production to biomass ratio for squid on the Bounty/Campbell
Plateau is assumed to be about 8 year� 1 from this work. O’Dor et al. (1980) point out that
growth rates of I. illecebrocsus from field data are well below those for captive animals,
indicating that food supply of the natural population is an important limiting factor. The
daily ration of Loligo pealei ranges from 3.2% to 5.8% of body weight per day
(Vinogradov and Noskov, 1979), which represents a Q/B of 11.7–21.2 year� 1. The mean
daily ration of I. illecebrosus is 5.2% (Hirtle et al., 1981). Here we assume that Q/B is 22
which is necessary if we assume a food conversion rate similar to the highest for I.
illecebrosus (25–36%) (Hirtle et al., 1981). Food of squid appears to be composed of
macrozooplankton (crustaceans), fish, and other squid (Vinogradov and Noskov, 1979).
Here we assume that the diet is made up of adult fish, juvenile fish, squid, mesopelagic
fish, and macrozooplankton (Mattlin and Colman, 1988; Hatanaka et al., 1989).
A.9. Mesopelagic fish
The mesopelagic fauna south of the Subtropical Front is assessed from the work of
Robertson et al. (1978). The most common mesopelagic fish taken in subantarctic water
were the myctophids Protomyctophum normani and Gymnoscopelus procerus. Eight
other mesopelagic species were relatively common: the goniostomatid Cyclothone
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 249
pseudopallida, and the myctophids Electrona carlsbergi, Electrona subaspera, Elec-
trona paucirastra, Hygophum hanseni, Symbolophorus ?boops, Lampanyctodes hecto-
ris, and Lampichthys procerus. The sternoptychid Maurolicus australis was a minor
constituent of the subantarctic fauna but was extremely common around shallow areas
of the Chatham Rise. We do not have data on the biomass of mesopelagic fish in the
Southern Plateau region therefore the model calculated this parameter. P/B ratio for
mesopelagic fish is assumed to be about 1. This compares well with data for M.
muelleri for which the growth parameters are very well known (P/B = 1.15) (Ikeda
1996). Similar P/B ratios (0.87–1.38) are given by (Childress et al., 1980) for
mesopelagic fishes off California.
Consumption/biomass ratios have been estimated to be 10.6 year� 1 from the age-
specific daily rations of 0–1.8 year old M. muelleri with a lifetime average of 2.9% or a Q/
B of 10.6 year� 1. Age-specific net growth efficiency of 0–1.8 year old M. muelleri has a
lifetime Q/B average of 16.7 year� 1. Pakhomov et al. (1996) estimated similar Q/B for
subantarctic myctophid species. Here we use 16 year� 1. The diet of M. muelleri is
described by Ikeda et al. (1994) and includes a wide variety of mesozooplankton species,
especially copepods. Therefore we assumed that mesopelagic fish eat mesozooplankton
and macrozooplankton. The biomass of mesopelagic fish is calculated by the model,
assuming that ecotrophic efficiency is 0.95.
A.10. Macrozooplankton
The mesopelagic fauna south of the Subtropical Front is determined from the work of
Robertson et al. (1978). Macrozooplankton are assumed to be mainly Euphausiacea,
although Decapoda and Amphipoda, are also included; Cephalopoda are treated in a
separate group (see above). The biomass of macrozooplankton is unknown in the
Southern Plateau region. Subantarctic open water macrozooplankton biomass ranges
from 0.012 to 4.4 g DW m� 2 and subantarctic around islands ranges from 0.007 to 2.86
g DW m� 2 (Pakhomov et al., 1994). To calculate macroplankton biomass, we assume
that their ecotrophic efficiency is 0.95. Production/biomass ratios are taken from the
literature. Euphausia lucens has P/B = 10.14–16.01 year� 1 (Stuart and Pillar, 1988)
which is high relative to that of Nematoscelis megalops (5–6 year� 1) (Lindley, 1982).
Cartes and Maynou (1998) use P/B ranging from 1.24 to 4.75 for euphausiids and 8.05
for peracarids. Here we use P/B = 10 year� 1 because of lower food availability and
colder temperatures.
Consumption to biomass ratios have been estimated to be 1.205% DW/WW (or about
9% WW/WW) for the mesopelagic shrimp Pasiphaea multidentata (Q/B is therefore
about 33 year� 1) to 0.061% DW/WW for the crab Geryon longipes, with mean values
of 0.364% DW/WW (Q/B 10.7 year� 1) on the middle slope and 0.524% DW/WW (Q/B
15 year� 1) on the lower slope (Cartes and Maynou, 1998). Stuart and Pillar (1990)
show that E. lucens is an omnivore that ingests on a carbon-specific basis 15–60%
phytoplankton, the remainder being mainly small copepods. Five to fourteen percent of
body C day� 1 was ingested by adults and Q/B ranged from 17 to 51 year� 1. Q/B of 33
year� 1 was used. The diet of macrozooplankton (euphausiids) may include phytoplank-
ton, microzooplankton, and mesozooplankton with copepods dominating the diet
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262250
(Barange et al., 1991). Therefore we assume that macrozooplankton eat, phytoplankton,
microzooplankton, and mesozooplankton.
A.11. Macrobenthos
Macrofauna biomass on the Bounty/Campbell Plateau is estimated at 0.25 g C m� 2 from
data collected at 750 m on the southern flank of Chatham Rise (S.D.N. et al., unpublished
data). A P/B ratio for macrofauna can be estimated from the relationship given by Brey and
Gerdes (1998) showing an exponential increase of annual community P/B with water
temperature. If a mean bottom temperature of 6.5 jC for 600 m is assumed (Livingston and
Schofield, 1993; Schofield and Livingston, 1994), and the regression equation of Brey and
Gerdes is applied, an annual P/B of 1.00 is obtained. A P/B ratio of 1.83 is used by Cartes
and Maynou (1998) for polychaetes. We assume that production/consumption is 0.35.
The macrobenthos are mainly deposit feeders, for example, on Chatham Rise, and
average of 65–71% of polychaetes were deposit feeder (Probert et al., 1996; P.K.P.,
unpublished data). Since polychaetes dominate the macrofaunal, their trophic structure
should be a reasonable representation for the macrofauna as a whole. We have assumed
that the macrobenthos is fuelled largely by the sediment bacteria but also feed on other
benthos although benthic crustaceans have been shown to also eat euphausiids (Cartes and
Maynou, 1998). In subantarctic water, 7–22 Ag Chl m� 2 day� 1 reaches 550 m (Nodder
and Gall, 1998) but this is a very small quantity and is ignored as a source of food for the
macrobenthos. Therefore we assume that the macrobenthos eats macrozooplankton,
macrobenthos, meiobenthos, and bacteria.
A.12. Mesozooplankton
The average annual biomass (wet weight and as carbon) of mesozooplankton is
calculated using data collected in 1993 (Bradford-Grieve et al., 1998), and historical data
collated by Bradford (1980). These data have been adjusted for the average depth of the
water column over the Plateau. Mean annual carbon biomass 0–615 m from these data is
1.058 g C m� 2. The production/biomass ratio for mesozooplankton for low productivity
water is about 12 (Shushkina et al., 1998). This may be compared with P/B of a subtropical
copepod Acrocalanus inermis which was measured by Kimmerer (1983) and varied from
0.07 to 0.36 day� 1 and 0.2 day� 1 (Vidal, 1980). Baird and Ulanowicz (1989) estimated an
average P/B ratio of 0.37 day� 1 over an entire year in Chesapeake Bay, an enclosed coastal
system. Secondary production is not continuous in subantarctic water because primary
production is very low in winter (Bradford-Grieve et al., 1997). Therefore P/B is estimated
by assuming that secondary production occurs over only 6 months of the year and daily P/B
is 0.11. We assume that P/B for mesozooplankton is about 20 year� 1.
Food intake has been determined experimentally (see Parsons et al., 1984) and ranges
from 10% to 20% of body weight per day for large crustaceans to 40–60% per day for small
crustaceans. Paracalanusmay eat 1.5 Ag N Ag body N� 1 day� 1 (Checkley, 1980) although
their specific ingestion of C was 3.6 day� 1 when feeding on N-deficient Thalassiosira. For
large copepods such as C. finmarchicus, Ohman and Runge (1994) showed that, in the
lower estuary region of the Gulf of St Lawrence, total food was ingested (diatoms
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 251
dominant) at the rate of 42–48% of body C day� 1 and in the open gulf total food was
ingested (dominated by aloricate ciliates) at a rate of up to 4% of body C day� 1. At all these
stations the copepods were laying eggs although the authors consider the possibility that
these copepods might not have been in equilibrium with the food supply. The implication
appears to be that protozoa may be a much better food source that autotrophic food
particles. It was assumed that P/Q is 0.35. We assume that the mesozooplankton feed on
phytoplankton, microzooplankton, and mesozooplankton (Bradford-Grieve et al., 1998;
Zeldis et al., 2002). Assimilation of copepods is assumed to be 0.3 for animals that are
feeding on microzooplankton (Pavlovskaya and Zesenko, 1985).
A.13. Ciliates
The average annual biomass of ciliates (as carbon) is calculated using data collected in
a number of months (Bradford-Grieve et al., 1998; Hall et al., 1999; J.H., unpublished
data). Integrations are made to 100 m and the assumption is made that there are no ciliates
below 100 m if there are no measurements below this depth. Ciliate carbon biomass was
calculated using a factor 0.19 pg C Am� 3 (Putt and Stoecker, 1989). The average annual
ciliate biomass is 0.167 g C m� 2.
Mean daily P/B of ciliates is 0.24 (n = 5) calculated from dilution grazing experiments
(J. H., unpublished data). These data are from subantarctic waters in August and January–
February; there was little difference in P/B between the two periods. A ciliate production
rate of 0.3 day� 1 (110 year� 1) is near the mean of estimates from a number of studies
tabulated by Kiørboe (1998) although growth rates of up to 0.9 day� 1 have been measured
(Verity et al., 1993). Also, in the subarctic Pacific, ciliate production of 0.10 day� 1 is
given by Landry et al. (1993) although this may be too low if predators were not fully
excluded from incubations. We therefore use an annual P/B of 88. We assume that
production/consumption is 0.36. The proportions in which ciliates consume their food
(phytoplankton and heterotrophic flagellates) can only be estimated although we know that
ciliates consume 70% of the biomass of heterotrophic flagellates and autotrophic biomass
per day (J.H., unpublished data).
A.14. Heterotrophic flagellates
The average annual biomass of heterotrophic flagellates (as carbon) is calculated using
data collected in a number of months (Bradford-Grieve et al., 1998; Hall et al., 1999; J.H.,
unpublished data). Integrations are made to 100 m and the assumption is made that there are
no heterotrophic flagellates below 100 m if there are no measurements below this depth.
Heterotrophic flagellate carbon biomass was calculated using calculated cell volumes
(Chang and Gall, 1998). The average annual heterotrophic flagellate biomass is 0.307 g C
m� 2.
Mean daily P/B of heterotrophic flagellates is 0.80 (n = 10) (292 year� 1) calculated
from dilution grazing experiments (J.H., personal communication). These data are from
subantarctic waters in August and January–February; there was little difference in P/B
between the two periods. Growth rates of heterotrophic microflagellates of >2 day� 1 have
been measured when conditions are not limited by iron (Chase and Price, 1997) but are
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262252
< 1 day� 1 at the low prey Fe/C of 9 Amol mol� 1 observed in the open subarctic Pacific
(see Tortell et al., 1966). In low iron growth conditions, carbon-specific growth of
microflagellates was 0.7–1.6 day� 1. The lower end of these growth rates is similar to
the growth rates calculated for subantarctic waters from dilution grazing experiments. We
assume that production/consumption is 0.35.
The proportions in which heterotrophic flagellates consume their food (bacteria and
phytoplankton) can only be estimated. We know that heterotrophic flagellates consume
4.4% of picophytoplankton biomass and 2.4% of bacterial biomass per day (Safi and Hall,
1999; J.H. unpublished data). Assimilation efficiency ((ingestion� excretion)/ingestion)
of heterotrophic flagellates in low iron conditions is 0.84 (Chase and Price, 1997) although
we initially use 0.70.
A.15. Meiobenthos
Meiofaunal biomass for the Bounty/Campbell Plateau at slope depths is estimated from
some nearby measurements (S.D.N. et al., unpublished data) and values from the literature.
Meiofaunal biomass integrated to 5 cm at 750–1000 m depth just north of the plateau
ranges from 0.07 to 0.09 g C m� 2. These data are somewhat lower than those derived from
regression equations for the temperate North Atlantic which indicate values of 0.35–0.40 g
C m� 2 for a depth of 600 m (Tietjen, 1992; Soltwedel, 2000). On the basis of various
regressions of density vs. depth (mainly North Atlantic), the total meiofaunal density at 600
m may be calculated to be f 1400 individuals 10 cm� 2. A mean weight per individual
nematode (the dominant taxon) of 0.2 Ag dry weight, or 280 Ag dry weight 10 cm� 2,
converts the number of individuals to 1.12 g wet weight m� 2, or 0.112 g C m� 2, assuming
dry weight to be 25% of wet weight and carbon to be 40% of dry weight (Feller and
Warwick, 1988). These data are of a similar order of magnitude therefore we assume an
average annual meiofaunal biomass of 0.1 g C m� 2. Annual P/B ratios of meiofauna vary a
lot, but 10 is often taken as an average value (Feller and Warwick, 1988). The prime source
of food for the meiobenthos is assumed to be bacteria with some contribution from other
meiobenthos. Annual production/consumption was assumed to be 0.31.
A.16. Bacteria (water column)
The average annual biomass of bacteria (as carbon) is calculated using data collected
just north of the region (Bradford-Grieve et al., 1998; Smith and Hall, 1997; J.H.,
unpublished data) and is estimated at 0.598 g C m� 2 using the carbon conversion factor of
Fukuda et al. (1998). This value is likely to be an underestimate as we have not taken into
account the likelihood that bacterial biomass is greater around the islands due to the
additional input of detritus from macroalgae as well as from the water column system
because of greater phytoplankton biomass and consequent trophic flows. The annual
production/biomass ratio for bacteria is estimated to be 87.4 year� 1. Shushkina et al.
(1998) estimate bacterial P/B to be 92 based on the analysis of for low productivity waters
whereas Sorokin (1999, Table 2.2) gives P/B of 0.5 day� 1 for eutrophic coastal habitats;
0.6 day� 1 in mesotrophic temperate seas; and 1.2 day� 1 in oligotrophic tropical seas
which seem extremely high. Estimates of production/consumption (P/Q) where obtained
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 253
by Tortell et al. (1966) for iron-limited water in the North Pacific. These estimates were
0.12–0.18, although we have used 0.23.
A.17. Bacteria (sediment)
We do not have direct measurements of bacterial biomass for the Bounty/Campbell
Plateau. Data from the surface 3 cm are available at slope depths on the southern flank of
Chatham Rise (S.D.N. et al., unpublished data). In order to compare these data with those
from other studies where sediment bacteria are integrated to greater depths, we use the data
at one station in summer which indicate that biomass at 0–9 cm is 3.6–4.5 times the
biomass at 0–3 cm and bacterial production at 0–9 cm was 1.2–1.5 times the production
at 0–3 cm. These data are very variable and because we suspect that the Chatham Rise
sediment is strongly influenced by the Subtropical Front sitting above it, we have decided
to use a biomass estimate from the regression of Deming and Yager (1992) of about 1.5 g
C m� 2 (to a sediment depth of 15 cm).
Annual bacterial production (0–3 cm) ranges from 0.18 to 0.35 g C m� 2 year� 1 for
stations 750–1000 m and these same stations have an annual bacterial P/B ratio of about 1
(S.D.N. et al., unpublished data). These values are considerably lower than the average
bacterial production of 16.9 g C m� 2 year� 1 reported by Kemp (1994) for slope sediments
( < 2000 m). Alongi (1990) found bacterial productivity (surface 0–5 mm sediment) to
decrease significantly with depth (695–4350 m) and, from the regression given, one gets a
figure for 600 m depth of 34.7 g C m� 2 year� 1. For the Celtic Sea (135–1680 m), Poremba
and Hoppe (1995) measured microbial activity in the upper 10 cm of sediments. Activity
was always very much higher in the top 0–1 cm of sediment. They give specific growth
rates for their station at 571 m: bacterial P/B in the top 0–1 cm was 0.0298 day� 1 or 10.9
year� 1. Alongi (1990) also gives specific growth rates for bathyal and abyssal stations.
They vary widely from 0.001 to 0.12 day� 1 (0.37–43.8 year� 1) but decrease with water
depth. Sorokin (1999) gives annual P/Bs of 14.6 and 7.3 off Japan. Using these latter values
of biomass and production, one gets average annual P/B ratios of around 11–12. Because of
this uncertainty, P/B is calculated by the model by assuming that ecotrophic efficiency is
0.80. A growth efficiency (P/Q) of 0.3 (Kirchman, 2000) is assumed here.
A.18. Phytoplankton
Average annual biomass is estimated to be 0.895 g C m� 2 from Bradford-Grieve et al.
(1999). This value does not take into account the often heightened chlorophyll concen-
trations around the islands and over the Pukaki Rise (Murphy et al., 2001). We therefore
increase annual average phytoplankton biomass by a factor of 1.2 to give 1.07 g C m� 2.
Daily primary production of 28–62 mg C m� 2 day� 1 in winter (June) and of 230–271
mg C m� 2 day� 1 in early spring (October) in SAW was measured in 1993 (Bradford-
Grieve et al., 1997), although in October, 1997, primary production in SAW (390–680 mg
C m� 2 day� 1) was greater than in 1993 (Boyd et al., 1999). As it is difficult to be sure of
the annual average primary production in the region from these data, we investigated
estimates from satellite data. Annual primary production, estimated from the data
presented by Moore and Abbott (2000) for the Subantarctic Water Ring, is about 80 g
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262254
C m� 2 year� 1. Therefore, these data give a P/B of about 89 and 118 year� 1, respectively.
P/B of 89 year� 1 is very low compared with annual P/B = 218 given by Shushkina et al.
(1998) for low productivity water.
It is noted by Ducklow (2000) that: ‘‘bacterial production in the water column is
maintained in a remarkably constant ratio to primary production, averaging about 0.15–
0.20 across oligotrophic and oceanic HNLC and upwelling and blooming systems.’’ For
The Southern Plateau system, however, the ratio is considerably higher at 0.66 (taking
bacterial and primary production as 53 and 80 g C m� 2 year� 1, respectively). Our
bacterial biomass and production estimates are typical. This suggests that annual primary
production over the Southern Plateau might be nearer to 265 g C m� 2 year� 1 and annual
P/B might be about 248. Nevertheless, Southern Plateau phytoplankton production thus
estimated is much lower than the range of values given by Ducklow in his Table 5 (465–
1548 mg C m� 2 day� 1).
A.19. Detritus and dissolved organic carbon (water column)
Annual average integrated particulate carbon (PC) for the water column is estimated
from data collected in 1993 (spring and winter) (McCarter and Hall, 1996a,b). Where
only particulate nitrogen (PN) data were available, particulate carbon was estimated
assuming that PC/PN is 6. Data were integrated down to 615 m. Detritus was estimated
by subtracting phytoplankton, bacteria, and microzooplankton biomass from the PC
data.
Antarctic concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in spring surface water of
the Atlantic sector of about 0.46–0.66 mg C l� 1 or g C m� 3 (Kaehler et al., 1997) and
0.52–0.84 g C m� 3 in October in subantarctic water east of New Zealand (M. van Kooten,
personal communication). In February–March in the Atlantic sector of the Antarctic,
Romankevich and Ljutsarev (1990) record surface concentrations of DOC >1.2 mg C l� 1.
Therefore we assume that annual average concentrations of DOC on the Southern Plateau
of 0.9 g C m� 3 and that these concentrations occur to 615 m to give an integrated
concentration of 554 g C m� 2. The sum of the particulate detrital carbon and DOC is
17.6 + 554 = 572 g C m� 2.
A.20. Detritus and dissolved organic carbon (sediment)
Average annual organic carbon content of the subantarctic sediment on the Pukaki Rise
is estimated from Carter et al. (1999). At 28 cm below surface, the total organic carbon
content of the sediment is 0.28% of the dry weight of sediment. The dry density of sediment
at 3.10 m below the surface is 1.031 g cm� 3. Therefore assuming the properties of the
sediment about the sampling depth are similar, 1 m2 of sea floor down to 15 cm depth is
150,000 cm3 or 154,650 g. Therefore, the carbon content of 0.28% of dry sediment is 433 g
m� 2. This result may be compared with data from 450 m on the south side of Chatham
Rise. At this station, the surface 5 cm of sediment has 0.6% total organic carbon. The dry
density of the sediment at this depth is about 1.65 g cm� 3. One square meter of sea floor
down to 15 cm depth is 150,000 cm3 or 247,500 g. Therefore, the carbon content of 0.28%
of dry sediment is 693 g m� 2. The actual average figure for the Plateau is probably
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 255
somewhere between although we have chosen the lower value since the water column input
to the sediment is known to be low (H. Neil, personal communication). Annual average
detritus supplied to the sediment has been measured by Neil on the southern flank of Pukaki
Rise at 50j15.64VS, 171j28.35VE to be 1.23 g C m� 2 year� 1.
We assume pore-water has similar concentrations of DOC as are found at Station
M271-96 at 806 m SW of Britain at about 48jN in summer (Otto and Balzer, 1998) and
the porosity of the sediment ranged from 0.66 to 0.47 (W. Balzer, personal communica-
tion). The total DOC down to 15 cm is 0.43 g C m� 2; carbon in this form is assumed to be
included in the Total Organic Carbon content of the sediment of 433 g C m� 2.
A.21. Assimilation efficiency
The portion of food consumed and not assimilated was taken as 0.2 (the default for
Ecopath) except for mesopelagic fish, macrozooplankton, macrobenthos, mesozooplank-
ton, ciliates, heterotrophic flagellates, meiobenthos (set at 0.4, 0.4, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.3, 0.3),
respectively, mainly to ensure there is enough substrate for bacteria in the model.
References
Alongi, D.M., 1990. Bacterial growth rates, production and estimates of detrital carbon utilization in deep-sea
sediments of the Solomon and Coral Seas. Deep-Sea Res., A 37, 731–746.
Anderson, O.F., Bagley, N.W., Hurst, R.J., Francis, M.P., Clark, M.R., McMillan, P.J., 1998. Atlas of New
Zealand fish and squid distributions from research bottom trawls. NIWA Tech. Rep. 42, 1–303.
Anderson, O.F., Clark, M.R., Gilbert, D.J., 2000. Bycatch and discards in trawl fisheries for jack mackerel
and arrow squid, and in the longline fishery for ling, in New Zealand waters. NIWA Tech. Rep. 74,
1–44.
Annala, J.H., Sullivan, K.J., O’Brien, C.J., 1999. Report from the Fishery Assessment Plenary, April 1999: Stock
Assessments and Yield Estimates Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington. 430 pp. (Unpublished report held in
NIWA library, Wellington).
Annala, J.H., Sullivan, K.J., O’Brien, C.J., 2000. Report from the Fishery Assessment Plenary, May 2000: Stock
Assessments and Yield Estimates Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington. 495 pp. (Unpublished report held in
NIWA library, Wellington).
Baird, S.J., 1996. Non-fish species and fisheries interaction working group report—May 1996. N.Z. Fisheries
Assessment Working Group Report 96/1. (Unpublished report held in NIWA Greta Point library, Wellington).
34 pp.
Baird, S.J., 1997. Report on the incidental capture of nonfish species during fishing operations in New
Zealand waters. Unpublished report prepared for Ministry of Fisheries Research Project ENV9701 (Ob-
jective 1). 15 pp. plus appendices.
Baird, S.J., 1999. Estimation of nonfish bycatch in commercial fisheries in New Zealand waters, 1997–98. Final
Research report for Ministry of Fisheries Research project ENV9801 (Objective 1). (Unpublished report held
in NIWA Greta Point library, Wellington). 57 pp.
Baird, S.J., in press. Estimation of the incidental capture of seabird and marine mammal species in commercial
fisheries in New Zealand waters, 1999–00. N. Z. Fish. Assess. Rep.
Baird, D., Ulanowicz, R.E., 1989. The seasonal dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 59,
329–364.
Baird, S.J., Sanders, B.M., Dean, H.A., Griggs, L.H., 1999. Estimation of nonfish bycatch in commercial
fisheries in New Zealand waters, 1990–91 to 1993–94. Final Research report for Ministry of Fisheries
Research project ENV9701 (Objective 1). (Unpublished report held in NIWA Greta Point library, Well-
ington). 63 pp.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262256
Baker, A.N., 1990. Marine mammals. In: Glasby, G.P. (Ed.), Antarctic Sector of the Pacific. Elsevier Oceanogr.
Ser., vol. 51, pp. 241–262. Amsterdam.
Baker, A., 1999. Unusual Mortality of the New Zealand Sea Lion Phocarctos hookeri, Auckland Islands,
January–February 1998. N. Z. Dept. Conservation, Wellington, N.Z. 84 pp.
Banse, K., Mosher, S., 1980. Adult body size and annual production/biomass relationships of field populations.
Ecol. Monogr. 50, 355–379.
Barange, M., Gibbons, M.J., Carola, M., 1991. Diet and feeding of Euphausia hanseni and Nematoscelis
megalops (Euphausiacea) in the northern Benguela Current: ecological significance of vertical space parti-
tioning. Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser. 73, 173–181.
Bartle, J.A., 1991. Incidental capture of seabirds in the New Zealand subantarctic squid trawl fishery, 1990. Bird
Conserv. Int. (1991), 351–359.
Behrenfeld, M.J., Falkowski, P.G., 1997. Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concen-
tration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 1–20.
Berzin, A.A., 1972. The Sperm Whale. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
Blaber, S.J.M., Bulman, C.M., 1987. Diets of fishes of the upper continental slope of eastern Tasmania: content,
calorific values, dietary overlap and trophic relationships. Mar. Biol. 95, 345–356.
Boyd, P., LaRoche, J., Gall, M., Frew, R., McKay, R.M.L., 1999. The role of iron, light and silicate in
controlling algal biomass in sub-Antarctic water SE of New Zealand. J. Geophys. Res. 104 (C6),
13395–13408.
Bradford, J.M., 1980. New Zealand region, zooplankton biomass (0–200 m). N. Z. Oceanogr. Inst. Chart, Misc.
Ser. 41.
Bradford-Grieve, J.M., Chang, F.H., Gall, M., Pickmere, S., Richards, F., 1997. Size-fractionated phytoplankton
standing stocks and primary production during austral winter and spring 1993 in the Subtropical Convergence
region near New Zealand. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 31, 201–224.
Bradford-Grieve, J., Murdoch, R., James, M., Oliver, M., McLeod, J., 1998. Mesozooplankton biomass, com-
position, and potential grazing pressure on phytoplankton during austral winter and spring 1993 in the
Subtropical Convergence region near New Zealand. Deep-Sea Res., Part 1 45, 1709–1737.
Bradford-Grieve, J.M., Boyd, P.W., Chang, F.H., Chiswell, S., Hadfield, M., Hall, J.A., James, M.R., Nodder,
S.D., Shushkina, E.A., 1999. Pelagic ecosystem structure and functioning in the Subtropical Front region
east of New Zealand in Austral winter and spring 1993. J. Plankton Res. 41 (1), 405–428.
Brey, T., Gerdes, D., 1998. High Antarctic macrobenthic community production. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 231,
191–200.
Brown, S.G., Lockyer, C.H., 1984. Whales. Laws, R.M. (Ed.), Antarctic Ecology, vol. 2. Academic Press,
London, pp. 717–781.
Bulman, C.M., Koslow, J.A., 1992. Diet and food consumption of a deep-sea fish, orange roughy Hoplostethus
atlanticus (Pisces: Trachichthyidae), off southern eastern Australia. Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser. 8, 115–129.
Carter, L., Cook, J.D., Foster, G.A., Garlick, R.D., Litchfield, N.J., Mitchell, J.S., Wright, I.C., 1997. New
Zealand region bathymetry 1:4,000,000. NIWA Misc. Chart Ser. 73.
Carter, R.M., McCave, I.N., Richter, C., Carter, L., et al., 1999. Proc. Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports,
vol. 181. Chapter 4 Site 1120: Central Campbell Plateau.
Cartes, J.E., Maynou, F., 1998. Food consumption by bathyal decapod crustacean assemblages in the western
Mediterranean: predatory impact of megafauna and the food consumption–food supply balance in the deep-
water food web. Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser. 171, 233–246.
Chang, F.H., Gall, M., 1998. Phytoplankton assemblages and photosynthetic pigments during winter and spring
in the Subtropical Convergence region near New Zealand. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 32, 515–530.
Chase, Z., Price, N.M., 1997. Metabolic consequences of iron deficiency in heterotrophic marine protozoa.
Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 1673–1684.
Chatterton, T.D., Hanchet, S.M., 1994. Trawl survey of hoki and associated species in the Southland and Sub-
Antarctic areas, November–December 1991 (TAN9105). N.Z. Fish. Data Rep. 41 (55 pp.).
Checkley, D.M., 1980. Food limitation of egg production by a marine, planktonic copepod in the sea off southern
California. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25 (6), 991–998.
Cherel, Y., Waugh, S., Hanchet, S., 1999. Albatross predation of juvenile southern blue whiting (Micromesistius
australis) on the Campbell Plateau. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 33 (3), 437–441.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 257
Childerhouse, S., Dix, B., Gales, N., 2001. Diet of New Zealand sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri) at the Auckland
Islands. Wildl. Res. 28, 291–298.
Childress, J.J., Taylor, S.M., Cailliet, G.M., Price, M.H., 1980. Patterns of growth, energy utilization and
reproduction in some meso- and bathypelagic fishes off southern California. Mar. Biol. 61, 27–40.
Christensen, V., Pauly, D., 1993. Flow characteristics of aquatic ecosystems. ICLARM Conf. Proc. 26,
338–352.
Christensen, V., Walters, C.J., Pauly, D., 2000. Ecopath with Ecosim: a user’s guide. University of British
Columbia, Fisheries Centre, Vancouver, Canada and ICLARM, Penang, Malaysia. 125 pp. [draft available
at www.ecopath.org/].
Clark, M.R., 1985. The food and feeding of seven fish species from the Campbell Plateau, New Zealand. N.Z. J.
Mar. Freshw. Res. 19, 339–363.
Clark, M.R., Anderson, O.F., Gilbert, D.J., 2000. Discards in trawl fisheries for southern blue whiting, orange
roughy, hoki, and oreos in New Zealand waters. NIWA Tech. Rep. 712, 1–73.
Crawford, R.J.M., Ryan, P.G., Williams, A.J., 1991. Seabird consumption and production in the Benguela and
western Agulhas ecosystems. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 11, 357–375.
Crawley, M.C., Warneke, R., 1979. Pinniped species summaries: New Zealand fur seal. Mammals in the Seas-
FAO Fish. Ser. 5, vol. II. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 45–48.
Daan, N., 1973. A quantitative analysis of the food intake of North Sea cod, Gadus morhua. Neth. J. Sea Res. 6,
479–517.
Deming, J.W., Yager, P.L., 1992. Natural bacterial assemblages in deep-sea sediments: towards a global view.
In: Rowe, G.T., Pariente, V. (Eds.), Deep-Sea Food Chains and the Global Carbon Cycle. Kluwer Academic
Publishing, Dordrecht, pp. 11–27.
Doonan, I.J., 1999. Estimation of New Zealand sea lion, Phocarctos hookeri, captures in southern squid fisheries
in 1999. Final Research Report prepared for the Ministry of Fisheries Research Project ENV9801 (Objective
2). (Unpublished report held in NIWA Greta Point library, Wellington). 8 pp.
Ducklow, H., 2000. Bacterial production and biomass in the oceans. In: Kirchman, D.L. (Ed.), Microbial Ecology
of the Oceans. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 85–120.
Feller, R.J., Warwick, R.M., 1988. Energetics. In: Higgins, R.P., Thiel, H. (Eds.), Introduction to the Study of
Meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 181–196.
Forch, E.C., 1998. The marine fauna of New Zealand: Cephalopoda: Oegopsida: Architeuthidae (giant squid).
NIWA Biodivers. Mem. 110, 1–113.
Fukuda, R., Ogawa, H., Ngata, T., Koike, I., 1998. Direct determination of carbon and nitrogen contents of
natural bacterial assemblages in marine environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3352–3358.
Gales, N.J., 1995. Hooker’s sea lion recovery plan (Phocarctos hookeri). Threatened Species Recovery Plan
Series, vol. 17. N. Z. Dept. Conservation, Wellington. 28 pp.
Gales, R., 1998. Albatross populations: status and threats. In: Roberston, G., Gales, R. (Eds.), Albatross Biology
and Conservation. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, pp. 20–45.
Gales, N.J., Fletcher, D.J., 1999. Abundance, distribution and status of the New Zealand sea lion, Phocarctos
hookeri. Wildl. Res. 26, 35–53.
Gales, N.J., Mattlin, R.H., 1997. Summer diving behaviour of lactating New Zealand sea lions, Phocarctos
hookeri. Can. J. Zool. 75, 1695–1706.
Gaskin, D.E., 1982. The Ecology of Whales and Dolphins. Heinemann, London. 459 pp.
Gordon, J.D.M., Mauchline, J., 1990. Depth-related trends in the diet of a deep-sea bottom-living fish assemblage
of the Rockall Trough. In: Barnes, M., Gibson, R.N. (Eds.), Trophic Relationships in the Marine Environ-
ment. Aberdeen Univ. Press, Aberdeen, pp. 439–452.
Haedrich, R.L., Merrett, N.R., 1992. Production/biomass ratios, size frequencies, and biomass spectra of
deep-sea demersal fishes. In: Rowe, G.T., Pariente, V. (Eds.), Deep-Sea Food Chains and the Global
Carbon Cycle. NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser., C Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 360. Kluwer Academic Publishing,
Dordrecht, pp. 157–182.
Hall, J.A., James, M.R., Bradford-Grieve, J.M., 1999. Structure and synamics of the pelagic microbial food web
of the Subtropical Convergence region east of New Zealand. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 20, 95–105.
Han, B.-P., 1997. On several measures concerning flow variables in ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 104, 289–302.
Hanchet, S., Haist, V., Fournier, D., 1998. An integrated assessment of southern blue whiting (Micromesistius
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262258
australis) from New Zealand using separable sequential population analysis. Fishery Stock Assessment
Models, Alaska Sea Grant College Program, AK-SG-98-01. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD,
pp. 155–169.
Hatanaka, H., Uozumi, Y., Fukui, J., Aizawa, M., Hurst, R.J., 1989. Japan–New Zealand trawl survey off
southern New Zealand, October–November 1983. MAFish N. Z. Fish. Tech. Rep., Wellingt. 9, 1–51.
Heath, R.A., 1981. Fronts around southern New Zealand. Deep-Sea Res. 28A, 547–560.
Hirtle, R.W.M., DeMont, M.E., O’Dor, R.K., 1981. Feeding, growth, and metabolic rates in captive short-finned
squid, Illex illecebrosus, in relation to the natural populations. J. Shellfish Res. 1, 187–192.
Humphrey, W.F., 1979. Production and respiration in animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 48, 427–453.
Hurst, R.J., Schofield, K.A., 1995. Winter and summer trawl surveys of hoki south of New Zealand, 1990. N. Z.
Fish. Tech. Rep. 43, 1–55.
Ikeda, T., 1996. Metabolism, body composition, and energy budget of the mesopelagic fish Maurolicus muelleri
in the Sea of Japan. Fish. Bull. 94, 49–58.
Ikeda, T., Hirakawa, K., Kajihara, N., 1994. Diet composition and prey size of the mesopelagic fish Maurolicus
muelleri (Sternoptychidae) in the Japan Sea. Bull. Plankton Soc. Jpn. 41, 105–116.
Ingerson, J.K.V., Hanchet, S.M., 1995. Trawl survey of hoki and associated species in the Southland and Sub-
Antarctic areas, November–December 1993 (TAN9310). N.Z. Fish. Data Rep. 67 (44 pp.).
Ingerson, J.K.V., Hanchet, S.M., Chatterton, T.D., 1995. Trawl survey of hoki and associated species in
the Southland and Sub-Antarctic areas, November–December 1992 (TAN9211). N.Z. Fish. Data Rep. 66
(43 pp.).
Iverson, R.L., 1990. Control of marine fish production. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35, 1593–1604.
Jarre-Teichmann, A., Brey, T., Bathmann, U.V., Dahm, C., Dieckmann, G.S., Gorny, M., Klages, M., Pages, F.,
Plotz, J., Schnack-Shiel, S.B., Stiller, M., 1997. Trophic flows in the benthic shelf community of the eastern
Weddell Sea, Antarctica. In: Battaglia, B., Valencia, J., Walton, D.W.H. (Eds.), Antarctic Communities,
Species, Structure and Survival. University Press, Cambridge, pp. 118–134.
Jarre-Teichmann, A., Shannon, L.J., Moloney, C.L., Wickens, P.A., 1998. Comparing trophic flows in the
southern Benguela to those in other upwelling ecosystems. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 19, 391–414.
Kaehler, P., Bjornsen, P.K., Lochte, K., Antia, A., 1997. Dissolved organic matter and its utilization by bacteria
during spring in the Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Res., Part 2 44, 341–353.
Kasamatsu, F., Joyce, G.G., 1995. Current status of odontocete in the Antarctic. Antarct. Sci. 7 (4), 365–379.
Kemp, P.F., 1994. Microbial carbon utilization on the continental shelf and slope during the SEEP-II experiment.
Deep-Sea Res., Part 2 41, 563–581.
Kimmerer, W.J., 1983. Direct measurement of the production:biomass ratio of the subtropical calanoid copepod
Acrocalanus inermis. J. Plankton Res. 5, 1–14.
Kiørboe, T., 1998. Population regulation and role of mesozooplankton in shaping marine pelagic food webs.
Hydrobiologia 363 (1–3), 13–27.
Kirchman, D.L., 2000. Microbial Ecology of the Oceans. Wiley-Liss, New York.
Krause, D.C., Cullen, D.J., 1970. Bounty Bathymetry, 2nd ed. N. Z. Oceanogr. Inst. Chart, Oceanic Ser.
1:1,000,000.
Landry, M.R., Gifford, D.J., Kirchmann, D.L., Wheeler, P.A., Monger, B.C., 1993. Direct and indirect effects of
grazing by Neocalanus plumchrus on plankton community dynamics in the subarctic Pacific. Prog. Oceanogr.
32, 239–258.
Laptikhovskij, V.V., 1995. Mortality and production of the squid Sthenoteuthis pteropus (Steenstrup) (Oegopsida,
Ommastrephidae) in the eastern Tropical Atlantic. Biology and Population Dynamics of Fishes and Inverte-
brates in the Atlantic Ocean. Sb. Nauchn. Tr. ATLANTNIRO, pp. 142–154. in Russian.
Laws, R.M., 1984. Seals. In: Laws, R.M. (Ed.), Antarctic Ecology, vol. 2. Academic Press, London, pp. 621–715.
Laycock, R.A., 1974. The detrital food chain based on seaweeds: I. Bacteria associated with the surface of
Laminaria fronds. Mar. Biol. 25, 223–231.
Legendre, L., Rassoulzadegan, F., 1995. Plankton and nutrient dynamics in marine waters. Ophelia 41, 153–172.
Levitus, S., Conkrught, M.E., Reid, J.L., Najjar, R.G., Mantyla, A., 1993. Distribution of nitrate, phosphate and
silicate in the world oceans. Prog. Oceanogr. 31, 245–273.
Lindeman, R.L., 1942. The trophic–dynamic aspects of ecology. Ecology 23, 399–418.
Lindley, J.A., 1982. Population dynamics and production of euphausiids: IV. Euphausia krohni, Nematoscelis
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 259
megalops and Thysanoessa gregaria, and eight rare species in the North Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Biol. 71,
1–6.
Livingston, M.E., Schofield, K.A., 1993. Trawl survey of hoki and associated species south of New Zealand,
October–November 1989. N. Z. Fish. Tech. Rep. 36, 1–40.
Livingston, M.E., Schofield, K.A., 1996. Annual changes in the abundance of hoki year classes on the Chatham
Rise (January 1992–95) and the Southern Plateau (December 1991–93). N. Z. Fish. Assessment Res. Doc.
96/14.
Livingston, M.E., Vignaux, M., Schofield, K.A., 1997. Estimating the annual proportion of nonspawning adults
in New Zealand hoki, Macruronus navaeselandiae. Fish. Bull. 95, 99–113.
Mann, K.H., 1973. Seaweeds, their productivity and strategy for growth. Science (Wash.) 182, 975–981.
Marchant, S., Higgins, P.J., 1990. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds, vol. 1. Oxford
Univ. Press, Melbourne.
Marshall, N.B., 1979. Developments in Deep-Sea Biology. Blandford Press, Poole, Dorset.
Mattlin, R.H., Colman, J.A., 1988. Arrow squid. N. Z. Fish. Assessment Doc. 88/34. 16 pp. Unpublished
document, New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Fisheries Research Centre.
Mauchline, J., Gordon, J.D.M., 1984. Occurrence and feeding of berycomorphid and percomorphid teleost fish in
the Rockall Trough. J. Cons. - Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer 41, 239–247.
Mauchline, J., Gordon, J.D.M., 1986. Foraging strategies of deep-sea fish. Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser. 27, 227–238.
Mauchline, J., Gordon, J.D.M., 1991. Oceanic pelagic prey of benthopelagic fish in the benthic boundary layer of
a marginal oceanic region. Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser. 74, 109–115.
Mazure, H.G.F., Field, J.G., 1980. Density and ecological importance of bacteria on kelp fronds in an upwelling
region. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 43, 173–182.
McCarter, N.H., Hall, J.A., 1996a. NIWA Carbon Flux Research Voyage 3009, Data Tables. NIWA Internal
Report 96/03.
McCarter, N.H., Hall, J.A., 1996b. NIWA Carbon Flux Research Voyage 3014, Data Tables. NIWA Internal
Report 96/04.
Mendoza, J.J., 1993. A preliminary biomass budget for the northeastern Venezuela shelf ecosystem. In:
Christensen, V., Pauly, D. (Eds.), Trophic Models of Aquatic Ecosystems. ICLARM Conf. Proc., vol. 26,
pp. 285–297.
Moore, J.K., Abbott, M.R., 2000. Phytoplankton chlorophyll distribution and primary production in the Southern
Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 105 (C12), 28709–28722.
Morris, M., Stanton, B., Neil, H., 2001. Subantarctic oceanography around New Zealand: preliminary results
from and ongoing survey. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 35, 499–519.
Murphy, R.J., Pinkerton, M.H., Richardson, K.M., Bradford-Grieve, J.M., Boyd, P.W., 2001. Phytoplankton
distribution around New Zealand derived from SeaWiFS data. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 35, 343–362.
Nagy, K.A., 1987. Field metabolic rate and food requirement scaling in mammals and birds. Ecol. Monogr. 57,
111–128.
Nodder, S.D., Gall, M., 1998. Pigment fluxes in the Subtropical Convergence region, east of New Zealand:
relationships to planktonic community structure. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 32, 441–465.
Nodder, S.D., Northcote, L.C., 2001. Episodic particulate fluxes at southern temperate mid-latitudes (41–42jS),in the Subtropical Front region east of New Zealand. Deep-Sea Res., Part 1 48, 833–864.
O’Dor, R.K., Durwald, R.D., Vessey, E., 1980. Feeding and growth in captive squid, Illex illecebrosus, and the
influence of food availability on growth in the natural population. Sel. Pap. - Int. Comm. Northwest Atl. Fish.
6, 15–21.
O’Driscoll, R.L., Bagley, N.W., 2001. Review of summer and autumn trawl survey time series from the South-
land and Sub-Antarctic area 1991–1998. NIWA Tech. Rep. 102 (115 pp.).
Odum, E.P., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia. 574 pp.
Ohman, M.D., 1987. Energy sources for recruitment of the subantarctic copepod Neocalanus tonsus. Limnol.
Oceanogr. 32, 1317–1330.
Ohman, M.D., Runge, J.A., 1994. Sustained fecundity when phytoplankton resources are in short supply:
omnivory by Calanus finmarchicus in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39, 21–36.
Otto, S., Balzer, W., 1998. Release of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from sediments of the N.W. European
ContinentalMargin (Goban Spur) and its significance for benthic carbon cycling. Prog. Oceanogr. 42, 127–144.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262260
Pakhomov, E.A., Perissinotto, R., McQuaid, C.D., 1994. Comparative structure of the macrozooplankton/micro-
nekton communities of the Subtropical and Antarctic polar fronts. Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser. 111, 155–169.
Pakhomov, E.A., Perissinotto, R., McQuaid, C.D., 1996. Prey composition and daily rations of myctophid fishes
in the Southern Ocean. Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser. 134, 1–14.
Pankhurst, N.W., Conroy, A.M., 1987. Size– fecundity relationships in the orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanti-
cus. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 21, 295–300.
Parsons, T.R., Takahashi, M., Hargrave, B., 1984. Biological Oceanographic Processes. Pergamon, Oxford.
332 pp.
Pavlovskaya, T.V., Zesenko, A.J., 1985. Rate of consumption and utilization of natural microzooplankton by
mass-occurring copepods of the Indian Ocean. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 32 (3–4), 457–471.
Poremba, K., Hoppe, H.G., 1995. Spatial variation of benthic microbial production and hydrolytic enzymatic-
activity down the continental slope of the Celtic Sea. Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser. 118, 237–245.
Probert, P.K., Grove, S.L., McKnight, D.G., Read, G.B., 1996. Polychaete distribution on the Chatham Rise,
Southwest Pacific. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. 81, 577–588.
Putt, M., Stoecker, D.K., 1989. An experimentally determined carbon: volume ratio for marine ‘‘oligotrichous’’
ciliates from estuarine and coastal waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34, 1097–1103.
Radchenko, V.I., 1992. The role of squids in the pelagic ecosystem of the Bering Sea. Oceanology 32, 762–767
(English translation).
Reichardt, W.T., 1987. Burial of Antarctic macroalgal debris in bioturbated deep-sea sediments. Deep-Sea Res.
34, 1761–1770.
Rivkin, R.B., Putland, J.N., Anderson, M.R., Deibel, D., 1999. Microzooplankton bacterivory and herbivory in
the NE subarctic Pacific. Deep-Sea Res., Part 2 46, 2579–2618.
Robertson, C.J.R., Bell, B.D., 1984. Seabird status and conservation in the New Zealand region. In: Croxall, J.P.,
Evans, P.G.H., Schreiber, R.W. (Eds.), Status and Conservation of the World’s Seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub.,
vol. 2, pp. 573–586.
Robertson, D.A., Roberts, P.E., Wilson, J.B., 1978. Mesopelagic faunal transition across the Subtropical Con-
vergence east of New Zealand. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 12, 295–312.
Romankevich, E.A., Ljutsarev, S.V., 1990. Dissolved organic carbon in the ocean. Mar. Chem. 30, 161–178.
Safi, K.A., Hall, J.A., 1999. Mixotrophic and heterotrophic nanoflagellate grazing in the convergence zone east
of New Zealand. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 20, 83–93.
Sakshaug, E., Bjorge, A., Gulliksen, B., Loeng, H., Mehlum, F., 1994. Structure, biomass distribution, and
energetics of the pelagic ecosystem in the Barents Sea—a synopsis. Polar Biol. 14, 405–411.
Schindler, D.E., Kitchell, J.F., Xi, H., Carpenter, S.R., Hodgson, J.R., Cottingham, K.L., 1993. Food web
structure and phosphorus cycling in lakes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 122, 756–772.
Schneider, D., Hunt, G.L., 1982. Carbon flux to seabirds in waters with different mixing regimes in the south-
eastern Bering Sea. Mar. Biol. 67, 337–344.
Schofield, K.A., Livingston, M.E., 1994. Trawl survey hoki and associated species in the Southland and Sub-
Antarctic region. May–June 1993 (TAN9304). N. Z. Fish. Data Rep. 47, 1–39.
Sedberry, G.R., Musick, J.A., 1978. Feeding strategies of some demersal fishes of the continental slope and rise
off the mid-Atlantic coast of the USA. Mar. Biol. 44, 357–375.
Sedwick, P.N., Edwards, P.R., Mackey, D.J., Griffiths, F.B., Parslow, J.S., 1997. Iron and manganese in surface
water of the Australian subantarctic region. Deep-Sea Res. 44, 1239–1253.
Shushkina, E.A., Vinogradov, M.E., Lebedeva, L.P., 1998. Biotic balance in the ocean and estimation of the
organic matter flux from epipelagic zones on the basis of satellite and expeditionary data. Oceanology 38,
628–635 (translation from Russian).
Sigurjonsson, J., Vıkingsson, G.A., 1998. Seasonal abundance of an estimated food consumption by cetaceans in
Icelandic and adjacent waters. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci. 22, 271–287.
Smith, R., Hall, J.A., 1997. Bacterial abundance and production in different water masses around South Island
New Zealand. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 31, 515–524.
Soltwedel, T., 2000. Metazoan meiobenthos along continental margins: a review. Prog. Oceanogr. 46, 59–84.
Sorokin, Y.I., 1999. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
Street, R.J., 1964. Feeding habits of the New Zealand fur seal, Arctocephlus forsteri. N. Z. Mar. Dep. Fish. Tech.
Rep. 9, 1–20.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262 261
Stuart, V., Pillar, S.C., 1988. Growth and production of Euphausia lucens in the southern Benguela current.
J. Plankton Res. 10, 1099–1112.
Stuart, V., Pillar, S.C., 1990. Diel grazing patterns of all ontogenetic stages of Euphausia lucens and in situ
predation rates on copepods in the southern Benguela upwelling region. Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser. 64, 227–241.
Summerhayes, C.P., 1967a. Campbell Bathymetry. N. Z. Oceanogr. Inst. Chart, Oceanic Ser. 1:1,000,000.
Summerhayes, C.P., 1967b. Auckland Bathymetry. N. Z. Oceanogr. Inst. Chart, Oceanic Ser. 1:1,000,000.
Taylor, G.A., 2000. Action plan for seabird conservation in New Zealand. Threatened Species Occasional
Publication, vol. 16. Department of Conservation, Wellington. 435 pp.
Tietjen, J.H., 1992. Abundance and biomass of metazoan meiobenthos in the deep sea. In: Row, G.T., Pariente,
V. (Eds.), Deep-Sea Food Chains and the Global Carbon Cycle. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht,
pp. 45–62.
Tortell, P.D., Maldonado, M.T., Price, N.M., 1966. The role of heterotrophic bacteria in iron-limited ocean
ecosystems. Nature 383 (6598), 330–332.
Ulanowicz, R.E., Puccia, C.J., 1990. Mixed trophic impacts in ecosystems. Coenoses 5, 7–16.
Verity, P.G., Stoecker, D.K., Sieracki, M.E., Nelson, J.R., 1993. Grazing, growth and mortality of microzoo-
plankton during the 1989 North Atlantic spring bloom at 47jN, 18jW. Deep-Sea Res., Part 1 40, 1793–1814.
Vidal, J., 1980. Physioecology of zooplankton: I. Effects of phytoplankton concentrations, temperature and body
size on the growth of Calanus pacificus and Pseudocalanus sp. Mar. Biol. 56, 111–134.
Vinogradov, A.P., 1953. The elementary chemical composition of marine organisms. Memoir of the Sears
Foundation for Marine Research, vol. II. Yale University, New Haven. 647 pp.
Vinogradov, V.I., Noskov, A.S., 1979. Feeding of short-finned squid, Illex illecebrosus, and long-finned squid,
Loligo pealei, off Nova Scotia and New England, 1974–75. Sel. Pap. - Int. Comm. Northwest Atl. Fish. 5,
31–36.
Vlieg, P., 1988. Proximate Composition of New Zealand Marine Finfish and Shellfish. Biotechnology Division,
DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Walker, K.J., 1995. Satellite tracking of wandering albatross from the Auckland Islands: preliminary results.
Notornis 42, 127–137.
Waugh, S.M., Weimerskirch, H., Cherel, Y., Prince, P.A., 2000. Contrasting strategies of provisioning and
chick growth in two sympatrically breeding albatrosses at Campbell Island, New Zealand. Condor 102,
804–813.
Weibe, P.H., 1988. Functional regression equations for zooplankton displacement volume, wet weight, dry
weight, and carbon: a correction. Fish. Bull. 86 (4), 833–835.
Williams, A., Koslow, J.A., 1997. Species composition, biomass a vertical distribution of microneckton over the
mid-slope region of southern Tasmania, Australia. Mar. Biol. 130, 259–276.
Wilson, G.J., 1974. Distribution, abundance and population characteristics of the New Zealand fur seal (Arcto-
ocephalus forsteri). MSc thesis, University of Canterbury. 204 pp.
Woehler, E.J., Green, K., 1992. Consumption of marine resources by seabirds and seals at Heard Island and the
McDonald Islands. Polar Biol. 12, 659–665.
Wolff, M., 1994. A trophic study for Tongoy Bay—a system exposed to suspended scallop culture (Northern
Chile). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 182, 149–168.
Wolff, M., Hartmann, H.J., Koch, V., 1996. A pilot trophic model for Golfo Dulce, a fjord-like tropical embay-
ment, Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 44, 215–231.
Zeldis, J., James, M.R., Bradford-Grieve, J.M., Richards, J., 2002. Omnivory by copepods in the New Zealand
Subtropical Front Zone: its role in nutrition and export. J. Plankton Res. 24, 9–23.
Zentara, S.J., Kamykowski, D., 1981. Geographic variation in the relationship between silicic acid and nitrate in
the South Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. 28A, 455–465.
J.M. Bradford-Grieve et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 289 (2003) 223–262262