Performance of high-loaded ANAMMOX UASB reactors containing granular sludge
Transcript of Performance of high-loaded ANAMMOX UASB reactors containing granular sludge
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4
Avai lab le a t www.sc iencedi rec t .com
journa l homepage : www.e lsev ie r . com/ loca te /wat res
Performance of high-loaded ANAMMOX UASB reactorscontaining granular sludge
Chong-Jian Tang a, Ping Zheng a,*, Cai-Hua Wang a, Qaisar Mahmood b, Ji-Qiang Zhang a,Xiao-Guang Chen a, Lei Zhang a, Jian-Wei Chen a
aDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, ChinabDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University, Abbottabad, Pakistan
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 1 November 2009
Received in revised form
28 May 2010
Accepted 10 August 2010
Available online 17 August 2010
Keywords:
ANAMMOX
Granular characteristics
Process performance
UASB reactor
* Corresponding author. Tel./fax: þ86 571 86E-mail addresses: [email protected]
0043-1354/$ e see front matter ª 2010 Elsevdoi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.018
a b s t r a c t
The performance of high-loaded anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (ANAMMOX) upflow
anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactors was investigated. Two ANAMMOX reactors (R1 with
and R2 without effluent recycling, respectively) were fed with relatively low nitrite
concentration of 240 mg-N L�1 with subsequent progressive increase in the nitrogen
loading rate (NLR) by shortening the hydraulic retention time (HRT) till the end of the
experiment. A super high-rate performance with nitrogen removal rate (NRR) of
74.3e76.7 kg-N m�3 day�1 was accomplished in the lab-scale ANAMMOX UASB reactors,
which was 3 times of the highest reported value. The biomass concentrations in the
reactors were as high as 42.0e57.7 g-VSS L�1 with the specific ANAMMOX activity (SAA)
approaching to 5.6 kg-N kg-VSS�1 day�1. The high SAA and high biomass concentration
were regarded as the key factors for the super high-rate performance. ANAMMOX granules
were observed in the reactors with settling velocities of 73e88 m h�1. The ANAMMOX
granules were found to contain a plenty of extracellular polymers (ECPs) such as
71.8e112.1 mg g-VSS�1 of polysaccharides (PS) and 164.4e298.2 mg g-VSS�1 of proteins (PN).
High content of hemachrome (6.8e10.3 mmol g-VSS�1) was detected in the ANAMMOX
granules, which is supposed to be attributed to their unique carmine color.
ª 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction process inwhich half of ammonium is converted to nitrite, the
Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (ANAMMOX) is a promising
biotechnology for the treatment of ammonium-rich waste-
water (van der Star et al., 2007; Joss et al., 2009). Under anoxic
conditions, the ANAMMOX bacteria accomplish autotrophic
ammoniumoxidation todinitrogengas employingnitrite as an
electron acceptor (Strous et al., 1998). It offers several advan-
tages over conventional nitrification-denitrification systems
including higher nitrogen removal rate, lower operational cost
and less space requirement (Jetten et al., 2005; van der Star
et al., 2007; Joss et al., 2009). Combined with single reactor
high activity ammonium removal over nitrite (SHARON)
971709..cn (C.-J. Tang), pzheng@ier Ltd. All rights reserved
first full-scale ANAMMOX process (70 m3) was applied to treat
sludge dewatering effluents in Rotterdam, The Netherlands in
2002 (van Dongen et al., 2001; van der Star et al., 2007). It stably
operated achieving nitrogen removal rate (NRR) up to
9.5 kg-N m�3 day�1 (van der Star et al., 2007).
High-rate is one of the prime objectives for ANAMMOX
process. The NRR of conventional nitrogen removal biotech-
nologies was less than 0.5 kg-N m�3 day�1 (Jin et al., 2008);
while for ANAMMOX process, it was higher than 5 kg-
N m�3 day�1 as obtained by a number of researchers using
different reactors such as upflow biofilter, upflow anaerobic
sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and gas-lift reactor (Sliekers
zju.edu.cn (P. Zheng)..
Nomenclature
ANAMMOX Anaerobic ammonium oxidation
ECP(s) Extracellular polymer(s)
HLR Hydraulic loading rate
HRT Hydraulic retention time
NLR Nitrogen loading rate
NRR Nitrogen removal rate
PN Protein
PS Polysaccharide
SAA Specific ANAMMOX activity
SEM Scanning electron microscopy
SHARONSingle reactor high activity ammonium removal
over nitrite
SVI Sludge volume index
TEM Transmission electron microscopy
TSS Total suspended solids
UASB Upflow anaerobic sludge bed
VSS Volatile suspended solids
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4136
et al., 2003; Imajo et al., 2004; Isaka et al., 2007; van der Star
et al., 2007; Tang et al., 2009a). To date, the highest NRR
reported was 26.0 kg-N m�3 day�1 at hydraulic retention time
(HRT) of 0.24 h (Tsushima et al., 2007). Previous works on
anaerobic processes including anaerobic digestion (Thiele
et al., 1990) and denitrifying process (Franco et al., 2006)
attributed high volumetric removal rates to three main
aspects. Firstly, the reactors should have high-quality sludge
retention for sufficient biomass accumulation. Secondly, the
microbial communities should aggregate as granular sludge or
biofilms for optimummetabolic activity. Finally, the substrate
requirements of ANAMMOX bacteria should be satisfied
simultaneously avoiding substrate inhibition, especially
nitrite inhibition (Strous et al., 1999; Isaka et al., 2007;
Tsushima et al., 2007).
The granular sludge characterized by good settling prop-
erty and high activity plays a pivotal role in the performance
of high-rate bioreactors (Thiele et al., 1990; Franco et al., 2006;
Zhang et al., 2008). The characteristics of granular sludge such
as heterotrophic aerobic granules (Beun et al., 1999; Beun
et al., 2002; Zheng and Yu, 2007; Adav et al., 2008), anaerobic
granules (Hulshoff Pol et al., 2004; Show et al., 2004; Wu et al.,
2009), hydrogen-producing granules (Mu and Yu, 2006; Zhang
et al., 2008), denitrifying granules (Franco et al., 2006) and
autotrophic nitrifying granules (Tsuneda et al., 2003; Liu et al.,
2008; Belmonte et al., 2009) have been extensively studied. In
case of ANAMMOX granules, the settling property, diameter
Table 1 e Operational parameters of the ANAMMOXsludge and the two UASB reactors before the start of theexperiment.
Characteristic R1 R2
A: Characteristics of the sludge
Diameter (mm) 1.9 2.1
TSS/VSS (%) 82 85
SAA (kg-N kg-VSS�1 day�1) 0.3 0.2
B: Operational characteristics of the two UASB reactors before the
start of the experiment
Influent ammonium concentration (mg-N L�1) 300 200
Influent nitrite concentration (mg-N L�1) 360 240
Effluent recycling ratio 0.5 e
HRT (h) 6.90 11.7
Sludge concentration (g-VSS L�1) 18.7 26.8
NRR (kg-N m�3 day�1) 6.0 2.9
distribution and substrate diffusion have been reported
(Arrojo et al., 2006; Ni et al., 2009). The characteristics of
carmine color of ANAMMOX granules and their associated
extracellular polymers (ECPs) have also drawn considerable
attention for the process optimization. The hydroxylamine
oxidoreductase and hydrazine oxidoreductase are two
important enzymes of the ANAMMOX pathway. Both of these
enzymes are rich in heme c (Klotz et al., 2008; Schmid et al.,
2008), which endows the granular sludge with the carmine
color. The extracellular polymers are assumed to be a key
factor in the formation of granular sludge, which can be
secreted by ANAMMOX bacteria (Cirpus et al., 2006).
In the present study, two ANAMMOX UASB reactors were
operated to investigate the performance of high-loaded reac-
tors possessing carmine granular sludge.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Synthetic wastewater
Ammonium and nitrite were supplemented to mineral
medium as required in the form of (NH4)2SO4 and NaNO2,
respectively. The composition of the mineral medium was
(g L�1 except for trace element solution) (Trigo et al., 2006):
KH2PO4 0.01, CaCl2$2H2O 0.00565, MgSO4$7H2O 0.3, KHCO3
1.25, FeSO4 0.00625, EDTA 0.00625 and 1.25 mL L�1 of trace
elements solution. The trace element solution contained
(g L�1): EDTA 15, H3BO4 0.014, MnCl2$4H2O 0.99, CuSO4$5H2O
0.25, ZnSO4$7H2O 0.43, NiCl2$6H2O 0.19, NaSeO4$10H2O 0.21,
NaMoO4$2H2O 0.22 and NaWO4$2H2O 0.050 (adapted from van
de Graaf et al. (1996)).
2.2. ANAMMOX bioreactors
The experimental work was carried out in two glass-made
UASB reactors of 1.1 L capacity having internal diameter of
50 mm. Both reactors were completely covered with black
cloth to avoid the growth of phototrophic organisms and the
related oxygen production (van der Star et al., 2008). The
reactors were fed with synthetic wastewater which was
flushed with 95%Ar-5%CO2 continuously to maintain anoxic
conditions. The temperature was set at 35 � 1 �C according to
Tsushima et al. (2007) and the influent pH was controlled in
the range of 6.8e7.0 (Tang et al., 2009b). The produced gas was
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4 137
initially absorbed by NaOH solution and then recorded by
a wet gas meter.
The two reactors (designated as R1 and R2) were initially
inoculated with anaerobic granular sludge taken from a paper
mill wastewater treatment plant (100 m3, located in
Zhejiang Province, China). The average diameter of the
anaerobic granular sludgewas about 2.2mm; and the VSS/TSS
contentwas about 85%. The reactors were successfully started
up and operated stably for 214 days before the experiments.
The operational characteristics of R1 and R2 are listed in
Table 1.
2.3. Reactor operation
In order to avoid the nitrite inhibition, both reactors were
operated at low influent nitrite concentration. R2 was
constantly fed with 240 mg-NO2�-N L�1 without effluent recy-
cling;while, R1was constantly fedwith 360mg-NO2�-N L�1with
effluent recycling ratio (recycling flow to inflow ratio) about 0.5.
Thus, the influentnitrite concentrationwasabout 240mg-NL�1
after dilution. Ammonium was supplemented relatively in
excess and was progressively increased during the shortening
of HRT in order to gain better nitrite removal efficiency and
performance stability (Tsushima et al., 2007). The HRT was
progressively shortened after 5 days at each step when the
reactor performance was stable. Throughout the operation, no
sludge was deliberately removed from the reactors.
Fig. 1 e Profile of nitrogen removal rate and influent fl
2.4. Analytical procedures
The influent and effluent samples were collected on daily
basis and analyzed immediately. The determination of pH,
ammonium, nitrite, nitrate, 5-min and 30-min sludge volume
indices (SVI5 and SVI30), total suspended solids (TSS) and
volatile suspended solids (VSS) concentrations were carried
out following the Standard Methods (APHA, 1998). The size of
granular sludge was measured by an image analysis system
(QCOLite) with a Leica DM2LBmicroscope and a digital camera
(Canon S30).
ECPswereextractedfromsludgebyEDTA(Shengetal., 2005),
then the extracellular proteins (PN) were determined by the
Lowry method using egg albumin as standard and the poly-
saccharide (PS) content was analyzed by the anthrone method
with glucose as standard (Wu et al., 2009). Heme c content was
determined according to Berry and Trumpower (1987) and
Sinclair et al. (1999). The nitrogen ligands from protein-bound
heme were replaced by pyridine in alkali, and the resultant
heme cwas quantified through the difference between spectra
of the reduced (sodium dithionite crystals) and oxidized
(potassium ferricyanide) compounds. The heme c concentra-
tion was calculated based on the millimolar extinction coeffi-
cient of 23.97 (mM cm�1) for the difference in absorption
between the peak at 550 nm and the trough at 535 nm.
Specific ANAMMOX activity (SAA) was determined
following the procedures described by Tang et al. (2009b). The
initial substrate concentration was maintained at
ow rate of the two ANAMMOX R1 (A) and R2 (B).
Fig. 2 e Effluent nitrite concentration and nitrite removal
efficiency of R1 (A) and R2 (B) at different HRTs.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4138
100 mg-N L�1 for both ammonium and nitrite and the sludge
concentration was kept about 0.6 g-VSS L�1. The cellular yield
and the specific growth rate were calculated based on the
procedures of Chen et al. (2010). Sludge granules settleability
(50 in number) was measured during the last 200 mm through
a 300 mm water column (Franco et al., 2006). Specific density
was measured according to Beun et al. (2002). Scanning elec-
tron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) were performed according to Tang et al. (2009a) and
Tang et al. (2009b), respectively. Nitrogen removal rate was
calculated as the sum of ammonium and nitrite consumption.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Nitrogen removal performance
3.1.1. Volumetric capacityThroughout the reactors’ operation, the influent nitrite
concentration was maintained constant whereby the nitrogen
loading rate (NLR) was progressively increased by shortening
HRT. The nitrogen removal performance of R1 and R2 is
depicted in Fig. 1A and B, respectively. During the first 250
days, the hydraulic loading rate (HLR) of R1was increased from
3.5 L L�1 day�1 to 114.3e123.8 L L�1 day�1, that corresponded to
HRT of 0.21e0.19 h; the NRR was enhanced to 72.5 � 2.8
(70.3e78.5) kg-Nm�3 day�1 with the NLR of 89.1e99.0 kg-Nm�3
day�1 (Fig. 1A). The nitrogen removal performance of R2 also
showed a similar trend when the influent flow rate was
progressively increased during the first 290 days. During that
period, the NRR was 65.4 � 3.0 (60.9e69.8) kg-N m�3 day�1
(HRT, 0.18e15 h; NLR, 78.9e97.9 kg-N m�3 day�1). Further
increasing the influent flow rate caused the nitrogen removal
performance of both reactors to decline (Fig. 1A and B).
Subsequent attempts made to increase influent flow rate of
both reactors did not significantly improve NRR. At the end of
the operation, the NRR of R1 was recorded to be 74.3 � 6.7
(66.8e82.8) kg-N m�3 day�1 (HRT, 0.16 h; influent flow rate,
152.4 L L�1 day�1; NLR, 125.0 kg-N m�3 day�1; days 399e412);
while for R2, the NRR was up to 76.7 � 4.5 (69.8e84.6) kg-Nm�3
day�1 (HRT, 0.11 h; influent flow rate, 221.0 L L�1 day�1; NLR,
137.1 kg-N m�3 day�1; days 410e417). The NRRs observed for
both reactors were three times of the highest reported values
(Tsushima et al., 2007).
3.1.2. Removal efficiencyThe influent ammonium concentration was gradually
increased for both reactors as described in Materials and
Methods section. The ammoniumremoval efficiencywasup to
90% when the HRT of R1 was longer than 1.58 h (influent
ammonium concentration, 330 mg-N L�1; NLR, 10.5 kg-N m�3
day�1); while it decreased to 70% when the HRT was further
shortened to 0.21 h (influent ammonium concentration,
420 mg-N L�1; NLR, 89.1 kg-N m�3 day�1). For R2, the
ammonium removal efficiencywas around 90%and 70%at the
corresponding HRT of 1.29 h (influent ammonium concentra-
tion, 220mg-NL�1;NLR, 8.6kg-Nm�3day�1) and0.30h (influent
ammonium concentration, 250 mg-N L�1; NLR, 39.7 kg-N m�3
day�1), respectively.
Nitrite removal efficiency of both the reactors at different
HRTs is presented in Fig. 2. For R1, the nitrite depletedwith the
removal efficiency higher than 96.8% and the average effluent
nitrite concentration was about 11 mg-N L�1 when working at
HRTs longer than 0.39 h. But it increased to 124.4 mg-N L�1
when HRT was shortened to 0.16 h with a sharp decrease in
nitrite removal efficiency to 65.4% (Fig. 2A). Fig. 2B shows the
nitrite removal efficiency of R2 at HRT range of 0.21 he0.10 h.
The average effluent nitrite concentration increased to
90.8 mg-N L�1 with nitrite removal efficiency of 62.2% when
HRT was shortened to 0.10 h.
Thenitrateproductiondidnotsignificantlyfluctuate inboth
reactors and it correlated to the substrate removal. The stoi-
chiometric ratios of ammonium conversion, nitrite removal
andnitrateproductionwere1: (1.31�0.03):(0.23�0.01) (R1) and
1:(1.32� 0.06):(0.25� 0.02) (R2), both were close to the reported
ratios (Strous et al., 1998).
3.1.3. Biomass growthProgressive increase of the ANAMMOX granules was observed
throughout the reactors’ operation (Fig. 3). The biomass
concentration in R1 enhanced to 57.7 g-VSS L�1 after 400 days.
While, the biomass concentration in R2 gradually increased to
42.0 g-VSS L�1 during that period. The VSS/TSS ratios of the
ANAMMOX granules in both reactors were in the range of
0.82e0.90. Relatively low calcium and phosphorous concen-
trations were included in the mineral medium based on the
results of Trigo et al. (2006), which gave rise to the high volatile
Fig. 3 e Apparent characteristics of the sludge in R1 (A) and R2 (B) at different periods, and the washed-out sludge (C).
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4 139
Table 2 e Diameter, settling velocity (vs), sludgevolumetric index (SVI5), density and specific density ofthe granules in the two UASB reactors at the end of theexperiment (average value).
Parameter R1 R2
Diameter (mm) 2.5 2.4
vs (m h�1) 88 73
SVI5 (mL g-VSS�1) 25 24
Density (g mL�1) 1.0323 1.0260
Specific density
(g-VSS L-granules�1)
108 94
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4140
solids content of the enriched granules in both the UASB
reactors (Trigo et al., 2006).
The ANAMMOX biomass yield in R1 was 0.23 g-VSS g-NH4þ-
N�1 with the specific growth rate of 0.0047 h�1 corresponding
to the doubling time of 6.1 days under NRR higher than 70 kg-
N m�3 day�1. The corresponding biomass values in R2 were
0.22 g-VSS g-NH4þ-N�1, growth rate of 0.0060 h�1 with the
doubling time of 4.8 days. The cellular yields in our studywere
approximately 2e3 times of the previously reported values
(0.07 g-VSS g-NH4þ-N�1, Trigo et al., 2006; 0.088 g-VSS g-NH4
þ-N�1, Strous et al., 1998; and 0.11 g-VSS g-NH4
þ-N�1, van Dongen
et al., 2001); and the doubling times were shorter than the
value reported by Strous et al. (1998) (11 days).
3.1.4. Specific ANAMMOX activityThe specific activities of the ANAMMOX granules progres-
sively increased with the passage of time. Amazingly, high
values of 5.6 � 0.9 kg-N kg-VSS�1 day�1 were detected for the
carmine granules when the NRR was higher than 70 kg-N m�3
day�1. The high activity was an important factor leading to the
super high NRR of the UASB reactors.
3.1.5. Sludge washoutThe nitrogen gas production rate progressively increased
along the development of nitrogen removal performance,
resulting in the increased superficial gas upflow velocity. The
nitrogen gas production rates for R1 and R2 were 52.42 � 7.42
and 52.68 � 5.24 L L�1 day�1 with the accompanied gas upflow
velocity up to 1.11 and 1.17 m h�1, respectively, when super-
ficial liquid upflow velocities were gradually increased to 5.78
and 5.24 m h�1, respectively.
Fig. 4 e ECP content of the sludge in R1 (A) and
The high shear force from liquid upflow and gas upflow in
both reactors led to the severe sludge washout (Figs. 1 and 3).
The effluent VSS as high as 8.3 g day�1 (R1) and 7.7 g day�1 (R2)
were observed during days 433e435. Consequently, the NRR
declined (Fig. 1).
3.2. Characteristics of ANAMMOX granules
3.2.1. Diameter distribution and settling propertyGranulation of ANAMMOX microorganisms resulted in gran-
ular diameters of 1.0e6.4 mm in both reactors. The average
granule diameter was 2.5 mm (R1) and 2.4 mm (R2). The
percentage of granules with diameter larger than 2 mm
ranged 68%e71%.
The granules in both reactors possessed a high settling
velocity (73e88mh�1, Table 2). The SVI5 range decreased from
42e51 mL g-VSS�1 to 24e25 mL g-VSS�1 (Table 2) with
a thickening process verified by an SVI5 to SVI30 ratio of 1
suggesting a fabulous sedimentation property. The density of
ANAMMOX granules in both reactors was about 1.03 g mL�1;
and the specific density of the ANAMMOX granules
(91e120 g-VSS L-granules�1) was also comparable to aerobic
granules (40e70 g-VSS L-granules�1, Beun et al., 2002) and
high-loaded denitrifying granules (128e136 g-VSS L-gran-
ules�1, Franco et al., 2006). The formation of well settling
granules resulted in accumulation of high concentrations of
sludge in both reactors in spite of working at extremely high
NLRs and short HRTs. It was another factor contributing to the
super high volumetric nitrogen removal rates.
3.2.2. Extracellular polymersThe microbial ECPs are a rich matrix of polymers, mainly
including polysaccharides and proteins (Liu et al., 2009). They
are supposed to play a central role in the formation of granules
in bioreactors (Liu and Tay, 2002; Hulshoff Pol et al., 2004; Liu
et al., 2009). In the present study, the ECP content determined
at differentnitrogen removal levels is presented in Fig. 4. Itwas
evident that both the polysaccharide and protein contents
increased with the increasing NRR. It was obvious that the
polysaccharides increased slowly as compared to the proteins.
The polysaccharide contents (mg g-VSS�1) for R1 and R2 were
71.8 � 2.3 (69.6e74.2) and 112.1 � 2.8 (109.8e115.2) at NRR
higher than 70 kg-N m�3 day�1; whereby the extracellular
protein contents (mg g-VSS�1) increased sharply to 164.4 � 9.3
R2 (B) at different nitrogen removal rates.
Table 3 e ECP content in different microbial granules.
Granular sludge Extracellular polymers (mg g-VSS�1) HRT (h) Reference
Proteins Polysaccharides PN/PS
ANAMMOX granules 164.4 � 9.3 71.8 � 2.3 2.29 0.16 This paper
Aerobic granules z40 z16 2.5 8 Zheng and Yu (2007)
Phenol-degrading granules 240 � 13 61.0 � 9.4 3.93 N.A. Adav et al. (2008)
Anaerobic granules 42.7 � 37.8 17.3 � 6.8 2.5 N.A. Wu et al. (2009)
Hydrogen-producing granules 70.9 � 4.5 115.6 � 5.2 0.6 18 Mu and Yu (2006)
Nitrifying granules 56 � 25a 18 � 1a 3.1 2.8 Martınez et al. (2004)
Denitrifying granules N.A. N.A. 2.2 N.A. Franco et al. (2006)
a mg L�1.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4 141
(153.7e170.1) (R1) and 298.2 � 8.7 (288.1e303.7) (R2), respec-
tively (Fig. 4). It was amazing to observe that the autotrophic
ANAMMOX granules possessed a high ECP content as
compared to the heterotrophic granules (Table 3). It was
previously reported that the autotrophic bacteria unable to
utilize organic compounds would secrete low ECP content
(Tsuneda et al., 2003). ECPs couldphysically bridgeneighboring
cells to each other by altering the negative charges on bacterial
surface (Liu et al., 2004). Thus, granulationmaybe facilitatedby
large secretion of ECP. As evident from Fig. 3, complete gran-
ulation of the ANAMMOX biomass occurred in both reactors
with theaveragegranulardiameterabove2mmwhenNRRwas
around 70 kg-N m�3 day�1.
The proteins to polysaccharides ratio (PN/PS) was usually
used to evaluate the granular settleability and strength
(QuarmbyandForster, 1995;Cuervo-Lopezetal., 1999;Batstone
and Keller, 2001; Martınez et al., 2004; Franco et al., 2006; Wu
et al., 2009). The PN/PS ratio of the ANAMMOX granules was
also lowwhen compared to othermicrobial granules (Table 3),
suggesting a greater granular stability (Franco et al., 2006).
Nevertheless, PN/PS ratios increased during the reactor oper-
ation when hydrodynamic shear force increased (Fig. 4). As
pointed out by various researchers, the higher PN/PS ratio of
microbial granules indicated lower strength and weaker set-
tleability (Quarmby and Forster, 1995; Cuervo-Lopez et al.,
1999; Batstone and Keller, 2001; Martınez et al., 2004); thus,
the sludge floating or foaming would be easily accompanied
(Franco et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2009). In this study, we deter-
mined the ECP contents of the floated granules.We found that
extracellular proteins and PN/PS ratios of the floated ANAM-
MOX granules at highNRRs andHLRswere significantly higher
than the counterparts of well-settled ones (Table 4).
Wu et al. (2009) reported that the secretion of extracellular
protein by heterotrophic anaerobic granules was stimulated
under high hydrodynamic shear force in the internal circula-
tion anaerobic reactor. On the contrary, Tay et al. (2001)
Table 4 e ECP content of the settled ANAMMOX granules and t
NRR (kg-N m�3 day�1) Sludge Polysacchari
44.87 � 2.39 Settled granules 76
Floated granules 79
76.68 � 4.46 Settled granules 112
Floated granules 134
pointed out that the hydrodynamic shear force stimulated
the production of extracellular polysaccharides in heterotro-
phic aerobic reactors. In the present study, the secretion of
extracellular proteins and polysaccharides were enhanced
when hydrodynamic shear force was increased. But extra-
cellular proteins were produced at a higher rate, leading to the
increased PN/PS ratio. Moreover, the over-production of
extracellular proteins can raise fluid viscosity in the reactor;
as a consequence, the shear force in the reactor is intensified
in turn based on Newton’s law (Wu et al., 2009). This would
increase the risk of sludge disruption due to increasing shear
force. So, in the case of violent shear conditions, the disrup-
tion of aggregates and sludge washout becomes inevitable
(Wu et al., 2009). The over-production of extracellular proteins
might be a potential cause resulting in the severe sludge
washout from the UASB reactors.
3.2.3. Heme c contentThemorphology of microbial granules is affected by a number
of factors such as seed sludge characteristics, substrate
composition, loading rate, feeding strategy, reactor design,
and hydrodynamic shear force (Liu et al., 2009). The color of
aerobic granules, nitrifying granules, denitrifying granules
and hydrogen-producing granules is usually yellow, while the
color of methanogenic granules is black because of the
precipitation ofmetal sulfides (Hulshoff Pol et al., 2004; Franco
et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2009). The color of high-load ANAMMOX
granules is uniquely carmine (Fig. 3). Heme c, which is an
important cofactor of some ANAMMOX bacterial enzymes,
was presumed to play a key role to attribute the carmine color
of ANAMMOX sludge. The present study showed that the
heme c content significantly increased with the increasing
NRR. The heme c content was 0.7e1.4 mmol g-VSS�1 when NRR
was lower than 10 kg-N m�3 day�1; and finally reached
6.8 � 0.9 (5.9e7.6) mmol g-VSS�1 (R1) and 10.3 � 0.6 (9.7e10.8)
mmol g-VSS�1 (R2) at NRR higher than 70 kg-N m�3 day�1. The
he floated granules.
des (mg g-VSS�1) Proteins (mg g-VSS�1) PN/PS
.77 � 2.29 184.39 � 9.27 2.40
.98 � 3.54 327.48 � 35.25 4.09
.14 � 2.77 298.19 � 8.72 2.65
.23 � 4.34 520.78 � 204.75 3.88
Fig. 5 e Transmission electron micrographs of the sludges taken from R1 (A and B) and from R2 (C and D) after the end of the
experiment. The innermost compartment, the anammoxosome (A), filled with material of moderate electron density and
granular texture, but devoid of ribosome-like particles, is surrounded by a single membrane. The paryphoplasm (P), in this
case relatively electron-transparent, surrounds the rim of the cell. The scale bar in A and C [ 2 mm; in B and D [ 0.2 mm.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4142
increase of heme c content was related with the increase of
ANAMMOX bacterial numbers, resulting in high SAA.
As evident from Fig. 3, the number of red ANAMMOX
granules in both reactors increased along the reactor opera-
tion period, which was in accordance with the increase of
heme c content. On the contrary, the amount of initial seed
sludge (grey particles) decreased significantly. The carmine
granules dominated in the R2 after 400 days’ operation
(Fig. 3B). However, several black zones appeared in R1 after
about 310 days’ operation (Fig. 3A). To our visual observation,
higher concentration of granular sludge was held in R1 and
the black zones may have resulted from the sludge blockage.
3.2.4. Morphology of granular sludgeThe structure of the microbial granules developed in both
reactorswasobservedbymeansofSEMandTEM.Thescanning
electron micrographs represented a sample of red-colored
matureANAMMOXgranule characterized by a cauliflower-like
shape (Arrojo et al., 2006). The granular surface mainly con-
sisted of spherical and elliptical bacteria; few or even no bacilli
and filamentous bacteria were observed in the two reactor
enrichments, suggesting that the ANAMMOX bacteria domi-
nated after enrichment in both reactors. The shape of domi-
nating cocci in R1 enrichment was like a shrunken ball, while
that in R2 enrichment it was like a gaseous ball, which were
different from each other.
TEMperformedon theenrichedbiomass taken frombottom
of the two UASB reactors revealed that the dominant cells in
both enrichments displayed typical ultrastructural features of
ANAMMOX bacteria; i.e., a single membrane bound anam-
moxsome containing tubule-like structure (Strous, 2000;
Lindsay et al., 2001; Schmid et al., 2003; Kartal et al., 2007)
(Fig. 5B andD).As evident fromFig. 5AandC, bothenrichments
were dominated by ANAMMOX cells. The morphology of the
ANAMMOX cells in the two enrichments showed some differ-
ences of the paryphoplasm (relatively electron-transparent,
as proposed by Lindsay et al. (2001)). It is evident that the
paryphoplasm in R1 cells was larger than that in R2 (Fig. 5).
The structural differences of the two reactor enrichments
observed by SEM and TEM were interesting. As shown, the
seed sludge and the mineral medium used in the study were
the same; and the hydrodynamic conditions as well as the
substrate concentrations in both reactors were also similar.
The major difference was the effluent recycling in R1 while
no recyclingwas done for R2. Thus the recycling of ANAMMOX
products (known or unknown) for R1 may be a cause lea-
ding to the ultrastructural differences of the two reactor
enrichments.
4. Conclusions
A super high-rate performance with nitrogen removal rate of
74.3e76.7 kg-N m�3 day�1 was revealed for the lab-scale
ANAMMOX UASB reactors, which was 3 times of the previ-
ously reported top value. The performance was stable until
the HRT was shortened to 0.16e0.11 h with the hydraulic
loading rate larger than 152.4e221.0 L L�1 day�1. The biomass
concentrations in the reactors were 42.0e57.7 g-VSS L�1 with
the specific ANAMMOX activity up to 5.6 kg-N kg-VSS�1 day�1,
both of which were regarded as the key factors leading to the
super high-rate performance.
The settling velocities of ANAMMOX granules ranged
73e88 m h�1 in both the reactors. The ANAMMOX granules
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4 143
were found tocontaina largeamountof extracellularpolymers
with the polysaccharides and proteins contents of
71.8e112.1 mg g-VSS�1 and 164.4e298.2 mg g-VSS�1, respec-
tively. Relatively high ECP content and low PN/PS ratios were
attributed to the ANAMMOX granulation. High hemachrome
content of 6.8e10.3 mmol g-VSS�1 were detected in the
ANAMMOX granules, which was an important cofactor of
someANAMMOXenzymesandwassupposedtobe responsible
for the unique carmine color.
Acknowledgements
Financial support of this work by the National High-
tech Research and Development (R&D) Program of China
(2009AA06Z311), the National Key Technologies R&D Program
of China (2008BADC4B05) and the Natural Science Foundation
of China (30770039) is gratefully acknowledged. We wish to
thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable
suggestions on revising and improving the work.
Appendix. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the on-line version, at doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.018.
r e f e r e n c e s
Adav, S.S., Lee, D.J., Tay, J.H., 2008. Extracellular polymericsubstances and structural stability of aerobic granule. WaterRes. 42, 1644e1650.
APHA, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water andWastewater, twentieth ed. American Public HealthAssociation, Washington DC, USA.
Arrojo, B., Mosquera-Corral, A., Campos, J.L., Mendez, R., 2006.Effects of mechanical stress on Anammox granules ina sequencing batch reactor (SBR). J. Biotechnol. 123, 453e463.
Batstone,D.J.,Keller, J., 2001.Variationofbulkpropertiesofanaerobicgranules with wastewater type.Water Res. 35, 1723e1729.
Belmonte, M., Vazquez-Padın, J.R., Figueroa, M., Franco, A.,Mosquera-Corral, A., Campos, J.L., Mendez, R., 2009.Characteristic of nitrifying granules developed in an airpulsing SBR. Process Biochem. 44, 602e606.
Berry, E.A., Trumpower, B.L., 1987. Simultaneous determinationof hemes a, b, and c from pyridine hemochrome spectra. Anal.Biochem. 161, 1e15.
Beun, J.J., Hendriks, A., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Morgenroth, E.,Wilderer, P.A., Heijnen, J.J., 1999. Aerobic granulation ina sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 33, 2283e2290.
Beun, J.J., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Heijnen, J.J., 2002. Aerobicgranulation in a sequencing batch airlift reactor. Water Res.36, 702e712.
Chen, J.W., Zheng, P., Yu, Y., Tang, C.J., Mahmood, Q., 2010.Promotingof sludgequantity andactivity results inhigh loadingrates in Anammox UBF. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 2700e2705.
Cirpus, I.E.Y., Geerts, W., Hermans, J.H.M., Op den Camp, H.J.M.,Strous, M., Kuenen, J.G., Jetten, M.S.M., 2006. Challengingprotein purification from anammox bacteria. Int. J. Biol.Macromol. 39, 88e94.
Cuervo-Lopez, F.M., Martinez, F., Gutierrez-Rojas, M., Noyola, R.A.,Gomez, J., 1999. Effect of nitrogen loading rate and carbonsource on denitrification and sludge settleability in upflowanaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Water Sci. Technol.40 (8), 123e130.
van Dongen, U., Jetten, M.S.M., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., 2001. TheSHARON-ANAMMOX process for treatment of ammoniumrich wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 44 (1), 153e160.
Franco, A., Roca, E., Lema, J.M., 2006. Granulation in high-loaddenitrifying upflow sludge bed pulsed reactors. Water Res. 40,871e880.
van de Graaf, A.A., De Bruijn, P., Robertson, L.A., Jetten, M.S.M.,Kuenen, J.G., 1996. Autotrophic growth of anaerobicammonium-oxidizing microorganisms in a fluidized bedreactor. Microbiology 142, 2187e2196.
Hulshoff Pol, L.W., de Castro Lopes, S.I., Lettinga, G., Lens, P.N.L.,2004. Anaerobic sludge granulation. Water Res. 38,1376e1389.
Imajo, U., Tokutomi, T., Furukawa, K., 2004. Granulation ofAnammox microorganisms in up-flow reactors. Water Sci.Technol. 49 (5e6), 155e163.
Isaka, K., Sumino, T., Tsuneda, S., 2007. High nitrogen removalperformance at moderately low temperature utilizinganaerobic ammonium oxidation reactions. J. Biosci. Bioeng.103, 486e490.
Jetten, M.S.M., Cirpus, I., Kartal, B., van Niftrik, L., van de Pas-Schoonen, K.T., Sliekers, O., Haaijer, S., van der Star, W.,Schmid, M., van de Vossenberg, J., Schmidt, I., Harhangi, H.,van Loosdrecht, M., Kuenen, J.G., Op den Camp, H., Strous, M.,2005. 1994e2004: 10 years of research on the anaerobicoxidation of ammonium. Biochem. Soc. Tran. 33, 119e123.
Jin, R.C., Zheng, P., Hu, A.H., Mahmood, Q., Hu, B.L., Jilani, G.,2008. Performance comparison of two Anammox reactors: SBRand UBF. Chem. Eng. J. 138, 224e230.
Joss, A., Salzgeber, D., Eugster, J., Konig, R., Rottermann, P.,Burger, S., Fabijan, P., Leumann, S., Mohn, J., Siegrist, H., 2009.Full-scale nitrogen removal from digester liquid with partialnitritation and Anammox in one SBR. Environ. Sci. Technol.43, 5301e5306.
Kartal, B., Rattray, J., van Niftrik, L.A., van de Vossenberg, J.,Schmid, M.C.,Webb, R.I., Schouten, S., Fuerst, J.A., Damste, J.S.,Jetten, M.S.M., Strous, M., 2007. Candidatus ‘Anammoxoglobuspropionicus’ a new propionate oxidizing species of anaerobicammonium oxidizing bacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 30, 39e49.
Klotz, M.G., Schmid, M.C., Strous, M., op den Camp, H.J.M.,Jetten, M.S.M., Hooper, A.B., 2008. Evolution of an octahaemcytochromecprotein family that iskey toaerobicandanaerobicammonia oxidation by bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 10,3150e3163.
Lindsay, M.R., Webb, R.I., Strous, M., Jetten, M.S.M., Butler, M.K.,Forde, R.J., Fuerst, J.A., 2001. Cell compartmentalization inplanctomycetes: novel types of structural organization for thebacterial cell. Arch. Microbiol. 175, 413e429.
Liu, Y.Q., Liu, Y., Tay, J.H., 2004. The effects of extracellularpolymeric substances on the formation and stability ofbiogranules. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 65, 143e148.
Liu, Y.Q., Wu, W.W., Tay, J.H., Wang, J.L., 2008. Formation andlong-term stability of nitrifying granules in a sequencingbatch reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 3919e3922.
Liu, X.W., Sheng, G.P., Yu, H.Q., 2009. Physicochemicalcharacteristics of microbial granules. Biotechnol. Adv. 27,1061e1070.
Liu, Y., Tay, J.H., 2002. The essential role of hydrodynamic shearforce in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge. WaterRes. 36, 1653e1665.
Martınez, F., Lema, J., Mendez, R., Cuervo-Lopez, F., Gomez, J.,2004. Role of exopolymeric protein on the settleability ofnitrifying sludges. Bioresour. Technol 94, 43e48.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 3 5e1 4 4144
Mu, Y., Yu, H.Q., 2006. Biological hydrogen production in a UASBreactor with granules. I. Physicochemical characteristics ofhydrogen-producing granules. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 94,980e987.
Ni, B.J., Chen, Y.P., Liu, S.Y., Fang, F., Xie, W.M., Yu, H.Q., 2009.Modeling a granule-based anaerobic ammonium oxidizing(ANAMMOX) process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 103, 490e499.
Quarmby, J., Forster, C.F., 1995. An examination of the structureof UASB granules. Water Res. 29, 2449e2454.
Schmid, M., Walsh, K., Webb, R., Rijpstra, W.I.C., van de Pas-Schoonen, K., Verbruggen, M.J., Hill, T., Moffett, B., Fuerst, J.,Schouten, S., Sinninghe Damste, J.S., Harris, J., Shaw, P.,Jetten, M.S.M., Strous, M., 2003. Candidatus “Scalindua brodae”,sp nov., Candidatus “Scalindua wagneri”, sp nov., two newspecies of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria. Syst.Appl. Microbiol. 26, 529e538.
Schmid, M.C., Hooper, A.B., Klotz, M.G., Woebken, D., Lam, P.,Kuypers,M.M.M., Pommerening-Roeser,A., opdenCamp,H.J.M.,Jetten, M.S.M., 2008. Environmental detection of octahaemcytochrome c hydroxylamine/hydrazine oxidoreductase genesof aerobic and anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria.Environ. Microbiol. 10, 3140e3149.
Sheng, G.P., Yu, H.Q., Yu, Z., 2005. Extraction of extracellularpolymeric substances from the photosynthetic bacteriumRhodopseudomonas acidophila. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 67,125e130.
Show, K.Y., Wang, Y., Foong, S.F., Tay, J.H., 2004. Acceleratedstart-up and enhanced granulation in upflow anaerobic sludgeblanket reactors. Water Res. 38, 2293e2304.
Sinclair, P.R., Gorman, N., Jacobs, J.M., 1999. Measurement of hemeconcentration. Current Protocols in Toxicology, Unit 8.3, JohnWiley &Sons, Inc.
Sliekers, A.O., Third, K.A., Abma, W., Kuenen, J.G., Jetten, M.S.M.,2003. CANON and anammox in a gas-lift reactor. FEMSMicrobiol. Lett. 218, 339e344.
van der Star, W.R.L., Abma, W.R., Bolmmers, D., Mulder, J.,Tokutomi, T., Strous,M., Picioreanu,C., vanLoosdrecht,M.C.M.,2007. Startup of reactors for anoxic ammonium oxidation:experiences from the first full-scale Anammox reactor inRotterdam. Water Res. 41, 4149e4163.
van der Star, W.R.L., Miclea, A.I., van Dongen, U.G.J.M., Muyzer, G.,Picioreanu, C., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., 2008. The membrane
bioreactor: a novel tool to growAnammox bacteria as free cells.Biotechnol. Bioeng. 101, 286e294.
Strous, M., 2000. Microbiology of anaerobic ammonium oxidation.Ph.D. Thesis, TU Delft.
Strous, M., Heijnen, J.J., Kuenen, J.G., Jetten, M.S.M., 1998. Thesequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool to study veryslowly growing micro-organisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.50, 589e596.
Strous, M., Kuenen, J.G., Jetten, M.S.M., 1999. Key physiology ofanaerobic ammonium oxidation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65,3248e3250.
Tang, C.J., Zheng, P., Mahmood, Q., 2009a. The shear forceamendments on slugging behavior in upflow Anammoxsludge bed reactor. Sep. Purif. Technol. 69, 262e268.
Tang, C.J., Zheng, P., Mahmood, Q., Chen, J.W., 2009b. Start-up andinhibition analysis of theAnammox process seededwith anaerobicgranular sludge. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36, 1093e1100.
Tay, J.H., Liu, Q.S., Liu, Y., 2001. The role of cellularpolysaccharides in the formation and stability of aerobicgranules. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 33, 222e226.
Thiele, J.H., Wu, W.M., Jain, M.K., Zeikus, J.G., 1990.Ecoengineering high rate anaerobic digestion systems:analysis of improved syntrophic biomethanation catalysts.Biotechnol. Bioengin. 35, 990e999.
Trigo, C., Campos, J.L., Garrido, J.M., Mendez, R., 2006. Start-up ofthe Anammox process in a membrane bioreactor. J.Biotechnol. 126, 475e487.
Tsuneda, S., Nagano, T., Hoshino, T., Ejiri, Y., Noda, N., Hirata, A.,2003. Characterization of nitrifying granules produced in anaerobic upflow fluidized bed reactor. Water Res. 37, 4965e4973.
Tsushima, I., Ogasawara, Y., Kindaichi, T., Okabe, S., 2007.Development of high-rate anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing(anammox) biofilm reactors. Water Res. 41, 1623e1634.
Wu, J., Zhou, H.M., Li, H.Z., Zhang, P.C., Jiang, J., 2009. Impacts ofhydrodynamic shear force on nucleation of flocculent sludgein anaerobic reactor. Water Res. 43, 3029e3036.
Zhang,Z.P.,Adav,S.S.,Show,K.Y.,Tay, J.H.,Liang,D.T.,Lee,D.J., Su,A.,2008. Characteristics of rapidly formed hydrogen-producinggranules and biofilms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 101, 926e936.
Zheng, Y.M., Yu, H.Q., 2007. Determination of the pore sizedistribution and porosity of aerobic granules using size-exclusion chromatography. Water Res. 41, 39e46.