OT420/430/620/630 The Pentateuch - Queensland ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of OT420/430/620/630 The Pentateuch - Queensland ...
2
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
Important notice
While every care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the information given below, it is the
personal responsibility of each student to check the current ACT Handbook, copies of
which may be found in the Library or online at the ACT’s website: www.actheology.edu.au
It is very important that students plan their time carefully to ensure that reading and
especially assignments receive adequate attention and so as to prevent a bottleneck of work
at the end of the semester.
It is very important that all quoted material in assignments be properly footnoted and
acknowledged. The attention of students is drawn to the ACT’s Academic Misconduct
Policy, as well as ACT Late Penalties Policy and Extensions Policy, all of which are available
on the ACT’s website. Failure to comply with the standards required will incur penalties as
outlined in the relevant ACT Policies.
The attention of students is also drawn to the section in the current ACT Handbook, headed
“Guidelines for Essays in Coursework Units” (see also the QTC Student Handbook). All
essays and assignments should comply with these standards.
3
OT420/430/620/630
Information about this unit
Unit description
This unit will introduce students to the theology and significant texts of the Pentateuch. Two-
thirds of the course (26 hours) will be devoted to the theology of the Pentateuch. The
remaining third (13 hours) will comprise exegesis of set texts from Genesis (and Exodus for
students in OT420 and OT620).
Learning Outcomes
OT420 Learning Outcomes
On completion of the unit, students will:
Know and understand
1. The contents and structure of the Pentateuch, with special reference to the selected
books
2. The themes and theological teaching of the Pentateuch
3. The major issues in contemporary study of the Pentateuch
4. The nature and methods of Old Testament exegesis
5. Selected chapters of the selected books
6. The relevance of the Pentateuch to contemporary ministry
In order to determine the meaning of the text of the Pentateuch, be able to:
1. Use sources such as biblical and theological dictionaries, commentaries and on-line
resources
2. Recognise literary form, genre and structure
3. Compare and contrast translations
4. Evaluate matters relating to authorship, date and purpose
5. Utilise the historical, religious, social and cultural contexts
6. Relate passages to their literary context
7. Establish the meaning of significant words and phrases
8. Trace inter-textual references and allusions
9. Discuss the main themes, arguments and theological teachings and
10. Exegete a selection of chapters from the selected books
Be in a position to:
1. Exegete the text of the Pentateuch for personal understanding and for use in ministry
contexts
2. Integrate perspectives from the Pentateuch into biblical interpretation and Christian
thinking
3. Apply the teaching of the Pentateuch to situations and issues in contemporary
Christianity and society
4
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
OT430 Learning Outcomes
On completion of the unit, students will:
Know and understand:
1. The contents and structure of the Pentateuch, with special reference to the selected
books
2. The themes and theological teaching of the Pentateuch
3. The major issues in contemporary study of the Pentateuch
4. The nature and methods of Old Testament exegesis
5. Selected chapters of the Hebrew text of the Pentateuch
6. The relevance of the Pentateuch to contemporary ministry
In order to determine the meaning of the Hebrew text of the Pentateuch, be able to:
1. Use sources such as lexicons, grammars, textual analyses, biblical and theological
dictionaries, commentaries and on-line resources
2. Evaluate textual variants and issues in the history of the text
3. Recognise literary form, genres and structure
4. Assess matters relating to authorship, date and purpose
5. Utilise the historical, religious, social and cultural contexts
6. Relate passages to their literary context
7. Establish the meaning of significant words and phrases
8. Trace inter-textual references and allusions
9. Discuss the main themes, arguments and theological teachings and
10. Translate and exegete a selection of chapters from the Hebrew text of the Pentateuch
Be in a position to:
1. Exegete the Hebrew text of the Pentateuch for personal understanding and for use in
ministry contexts
2. Integrate perspectives from the Pentateuch into biblical interpretation and Christian
thinking
3. Apply the teaching of the Pentateuch to situations and issues in contemporary
Christianity and society
5
OT420/430/620/630
OT620 Learning outcomes
On completion of the unit, students will:
Know and understand:
1. The contents and structure of the Pentateuch, with special reference to the selected
books
2. The themes and theological teaching of the Pentateuch
3. The major issues in contemporary study of the Pentateuch
4. The nature and methods of Old Testament exegesis
5. Selected chapters of the selected books
6. The relevance of the Pentateuch to contemporary ministry
7. A selection of historic and contemporary interpretations of the Pentateuch
In order to determine the meaning of the text of the Pentateuch, be able to:
1. Use sources such as biblical and theological dictionaries, commentaries and on-line
resources
2. Recognise literary form, genre and structure
3. Recognise issues involved in translation, including text, and word issues
4. Evaluate matters relating to authorship, date and purpose
5. Utilise the historical, religious, social and cultural contexts
6. Relate passages to their literary context
7. Establish the meaning of significant words and phrases
8. Trace inter-textual references and allusions
9. Discuss the main themes, arguments and theological teachings and
10. Exegete a selection of chapters from the selected books
11. Discuss interpretations of the Pentateuch
Be in a position to:
1. Exegete the text of the Pentateuch for personal understanding and for use in ministry
contexts
2. Integrate perspectives from the Pentateuch into biblical interpretation and Christian
thinking
3. Apply the teaching of the Pentateuch to situations and issues in contemporary
Christianity and society
4. Evaluate interpretations of the Pentateuch
6
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
OT630 Learning Outcomes
On completion of the unit, students will:
Know and understand:
1. The contents and structure of the Pentateuch, with special reference to the selected
books
2. The themes and theological teaching of the Pentateuch
3. The major issues in contemporary study of the Pentateuch
4. The nature and methods of Old Testament exegesis
5. Selected chapters of the Hebrew text of the Pentateuch
6. The relevance of the Pentateuch to contemporary ministry
7. A selection of historic and contemporary interpretations of the Pentateuch
In order to determine the meaning of the Hebrew text of the Pentateuch, be able to:
1. Use sources such as lexicons, grammars, textual analyses, biblical and theological
dictionaries, commentaries and on-line resources
2. Evaluate textual variants and issues in the history of the text
3. Recognise literary form, genres and structure
4. Assess matters relating to authorship, date and purpose
5. Utilise the historical, religious, social and cultural contexts
6. Relate passages to their literary context
7. Establish the meaning of significant words and phrases
8. Trace inter-textual references and allusions
9. Discuss the main themes, arguments and theological teachings
10. Translate and exegete a selection of chapters from the Hebrew text of the Pentateuch
11. Discuss interpretations of the Pentateuch
Be in a position to:
1. Exegete the Hebrew text of the Pentateuch for personal understanding and for use in
ministry contexts
2. Integrate perspectives from the Pentateuch into biblical interpretation and Christian
thinking
3. Apply the teaching of the Pentateuch to situations and issues in contemporary
Christianity and society
4. Evaluate interpretations of the Pentateuch
7
OT420/430/620/630
How this Unit Contributes to the Course
The Pentateuch provides the building blocks not only for the theology of the Old
Testament, but of the whole Bible. It is here that key categories like covenant, atonement,
blessing and election are introduced and given shape. It is here that the narrative trajectory
which runs through all of Scripture is set. One could argue that unless one grasps the
message of the Pentateuch, then one is bound to misunderstand the message of the
gospel.
This unit, then, is a fundamental part of your course. It is designed to enable you to grapple
with both the details of the text and the grand themes which dominate the Pentateuch as a
literary work. The unit will endeavour to enable you to read the various genres contained in
Genesis-Deuteronomy sensitively, and to think through the implications of the theological
issues which it raises. This unit on the Pentateuch then, really is a core subject which will
shape or reshape the way in which you read the whole Bible, and articulate the message of
the gospel.
Pre-requisites and Co-requisites
Students enrolled in The Pentateuch should have successfully completed OT301/501.
Hebrew exegesis students (OT430/630) need to have successfully completed LA003A/B.
How this unit is organized & what we expect of you The unit is taught week by week right through the Semester for 13 weeks. There are two
lectures each week, which all students attend together, each of 50 minutes duration. Students
in OT420 and OT620 will also meet for a 50-minute lecture and discussion dealing with the
exegesis of English texts, while students in OT430 and 630 will meet at a different time for a
50-minute lecture including translation and discussion of the Hebrew text.
For both Hebrew and English students this unit will involve 3 hours per week of contact time.
This unit is worth 4 credit points towards your degree. At Bachelor level, a 4 cp unit is
considered to require a total time commitment of 6-8 hrs per week, and at MDiv level the
requirement is 7-9 hours.
Students are expected to attend all lectures, complete any set pre-reading and complete any
assessment tasks by the relevant due date. Please do be in touch as soon as you can if you
anticipate having any difficulties with your assessments or with meeting a due date.
8
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
Teaching staff
LECTURER AND UNIT CO-ORDINATOR
Dr Douglas Green will lecture in Weeks 1-6 and 8-10 of the unit and all the exegesis sections.
P 07 3062 6939
Rev Dr Gary Millar will lecture in Weeks 7 and 11-13 of the unit.
P 07 3062 6939
Other Key Contacts
Registrar’s office
Contact the Registrar’s office for any queries about which unit to enrol in next, if you wish to
change your enrolment, defer due to illness, family circumstances etc., or request an
extension for your assessment (criteria apply).
P 07 3062 6939, extension 2
Moodle functions and queries
Contact the Registrar or the Assistant Registrar for help if something on Moodle is not
working, if you need help using Moodle etc.
P 07 3062 6939, extension 2
Library/Resources
Contact the Librarian for help with finding resources for your assessment, finding full-text
database articles, for help with logging into the library databases and catalogue, and for help
with how to renew a book for longer or place a hold on a book currently out to another
person.
P 07 3062 6939, extension 3
9
OT420/430/620/630
Unit timetable: topics & teaching and learning activities
LECTURE TOPIC READING (see below) PASSAGES FOR EXEGESIS
WEEK 1 Creation and the Image
of God (DG)
Alexander chap. 7
Greenwood, ‘Cosmology’
Crouch, ‘Genesis 1:26–7’
English: Gen 1:1-13
Hebrew: Gen 1:1-5
WEEK 2 The Kingdom of God
(Genesis 1-2) (DG)
Alexander chap. 8
Dumbrell, ‘Genesis 2:1-17’
Beale, ‘Eden, the Temple’
Block, ‘Eden: A Temple?’
Waltke, ‘Kingdom of God’
McCartney, ‘Ecce Homo’
English: Gen 1:14-31
Hebrew: Gen 1:6-13
WEEK 3
The Fall and Its
Consequences
(including the Flood)
(DG)
Alexander chap 11 English: Gen 2 :1-14
Hebrew: Gen 1:14-23
WEEK 4
Seed: Does the
Pentateuch Have a
Messianic Hope? (DG)
Alexander chap. 9
Hamilton, ‘Skull Crushing
Seed’
English: Gen 2:15-25
Hebrew: Gen 1:24-31
WEEK 5 The Patriarchal
Narratives (DG)
Alexander chap. 10 English: Gen 3:1-13
Hebrew: Gen 2:1-14
WEEK 6
The Covenants (DG) Alexander chap. 12 English: Gen 3:14-24
Hebrew: Gen 2:15-25
WEEK 7 Land (GM) Brueggemann, Land, 1-25 English: Gen 4:1-16
Hebrew: Gen 3:1-13
HOLIDAYS AND MISSION
WEEK 8
The Exodus (DG) Alexander chaps. 13 and 14
Dempster, ‘Exodus and
Biblical Theology’
English: Gen 12:1-20
Hebrew: Gen 3:14-24
WEEK 9
Sacrifice and Holiness
(DG)
Alexander chaps. 17-19
Wenham, ‘Christ’s Healing
Ministry’
English: Gen 15:1-21
Hebrew: Gen 4:1-7; 12:1-3
WEEK 10 Israel and the Nations
(including Holy War)
(DG)
Alexander chap. 10
Wright, ‘OT and Christian
Mission’
Carrol, ‘Blessing the Nations’
English: Gen 22:1-19
Hebrew: Gen 15:1-11
WEEK 11 Law (GM) Alexander chaps. 15 and 16
Block, ‘Preaching OT Law’
Barton, ‘Law and Narrative’
English: Exod 14:1-14
Hebrew: Gen 15:12-21
WEEK 12 The Word of God (GM) Alexander chaps. 20-22 English: Exod 14:15-31
Hebrew: Gen 22:1-8
WEEK 13 Blessing and Curse (GM) Alexander chaps. 23 and 24 English: Exod 20:1-21
Hebrew: Gen 22:9-19
To encourage quality discussion, readings should be completed before each lecture topic is
covered in class. Note that the chapters in Alexander, From Paradise to the Promised Land,
refer to the 3rd edition.
Exegesis: In addition to the commentaries listed below, students in the Hebrew exegesis
section may wish to consult: Bandstra, Barry L. Genesis 1–11: A Handbook on the Hebrew Text.
Baylor Handbook on the Hebrew Bible. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2008.
10
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
OT420 (English Text) Assessments Assessments are submitted online via Moodle.
In order to pass the unit, you must submit all assessment pieces and attain a mark of at
least 50% for the unit as a whole.
Late submission of assessment, without prior permission, will be taken into account in
determining your mark.
Your essays must also be within 10% of the required word limit and your ability to meet this
requirement will also be taken into account in determining your mark. QTC seeks to prepare
you for ministry, and in ministry delivering presentations on time & within an acceptable
length are essential skills.
ASSESSMENT TASK DESCRIPTION
Essay
2500 words
45% of the final grade
Write a 2500-word essay on ONE of the following topics:
1. The challenge in interpreting Genesis 1 is less about deciding
whether the ‘days’ are literal or figurative, and more about
the question of its cosmology. Do you agree or disagree?
Does this chapter assume an ancient cosmology (e.g., a flat
earth, a solid dome holding back a celestial sea)? Or is its
cosmology consistent with a modern understanding of how
the universe functions? What implications does your answer
have for the interpretation of Genesis 1?
2. The Apostle Paul presents Abraham as a model of faith (e.g.,
Galatians 3), but it is arguable that Genesis itself paints a
more complex and ambiguous picture of the first patriarch,
namely, as a mixture of faith and doubt. Do you agree or
disagree with this assessment of the characterization of
Abraham in Genesis? Give reasons for your answer. Finally,
account for any differences between the characterization of
Abraham in Genesis and the way he is portrayed in the New
Testament.
3. Three English confessions of the 17th century – the
Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), the Savoy
Declaration (1658) and London Confession of Faith (1689) –
agree that Christians are required to obey the Ten
Commandments. For example, Section 19.5 in each
confession is identical:
The moral law [defined in Paragraph 2 as the Ten
Commandments] does forever bind all, as well justified
persons as others, to the obedience thereof; and that, not
only in regard of the matter contained in it, but also in
respect of the authority of God the Creator, who gave
it. Neither does Christ, in the Gospel, any way dissolve,
but much strengthen this obligation.
Provide arguments for and against this view of the
applicability of the Ten Commandments to Christians, with
particular focus on the issues raised by the Fourth
Commandment (Sabbath observance). Which approach do
you find most persuasive and why?
11
OT420/430/620/630
4. In Exodus 25:8, The Lord says ‘Let them make me a sanctuary,
that I may dwell in their midst’. This statement expresses a
central theme of the Pentateuch: God’s presence with his
people. Trace the development of this theme throughout the
Pentateuch. In the final quarter of the essay, show how this
theme finds its climax in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
5. What contribution does Deuteronomy 34 make to (a) the
debate over the authorship of the Pentateuch, and (b) the
theological message of the Pentateuch?
Exegesis Paper
3000 words total
55% of the final grade
Write ONE 3000-word Exegesis Paper on the English text of a
passage chosen from the following selection:
1. Genesis 39:1-23 (Joseph and Potiphar’s wife)
2. Exodus 33:12-23 (Moses intercedes for Israel)
3. Leviticus 25:1-22 (Sabbath Year and the Year of Jubilee)
4. Numbers 13:25-33 (the report of the spies)
5. Deuteronomy 14:22-29 (the law concerning tithes)
Note also the specific instructions concerning Christian
interpretation and application below (‘Guide to
Assessments: Exegesis Paper’).
12
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
OT430 (Hebrew Text) Assessments Assessments are submitted online via Moodle.
In order to pass the unit, you must submit all assessment pieces and attain a mark of at
least 50% for the unit as a whole.
Late submission of assessment, without prior permission, will be taken into account in
determining your mark.
Your essays must also be within 10% of the required word limit and your ability to meet this
requirement will also be taken into account in determining your mark. QTC seeks to prepare
you for ministry, and in ministry delivering presentations on time & within an acceptable
length are essential skills
ASSESSMENT TASK DESCRIPTION
Essay
2500 word essay
45% of the final grade
Write a 2500-word essay on ONE of the following topics:
1. The challenge in interpreting Genesis 1 is less about deciding
whether the ‘days’ are literal or figurative, and more about
the question of its cosmology. Do you agree or disagree?
Does this chapter assume an ancient cosmology (e.g., a flat
earth, a solid dome holding back a celestial sea)? Or is its
cosmology consistent with a modern understanding of how
the universe functions? What implications does your answer
have for the interpretation of Genesis 1?
2. The Apostle Paul presents Abraham as a model of faith (e.g.,
Galatians 3), but it is arguable that Genesis itself paints a
more complex and ambiguous picture of the first patriarch,
namely, as a mixture of faith and doubt. Do you agree or
disagree with this assessment of the characterization of
Abraham in Genesis? Give reasons for your answer. Finally,
account for any differences between the characterization of
Abraham in Genesis and the way he is portrayed in the New
Testament.
3. Three English confessions of the 17th century – the
Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), the Savoy
Declaration (1658) and London Confession of Faith (1689) –
agree that Christians are required to obey the Ten
Commandments. For example, Section 19.5 in each
confession is identical:
The moral law [defined in Paragraph 2 as the Ten
Commandments] does forever bind all, as well justified
persons as others, to the obedience thereof; and that, not
only in regard of the matter contained in it, but also in
respect of the authority of God the Creator, who gave
it. Neither does Christ, in the Gospel, any way dissolve,
but much strengthen this obligation.
Provide arguments for and against this view of the
applicability of the Ten Commandments to Christians, with
particular focus on the issues raised by the Fourth
Commandment (Sabbath observance). Which approach do
you find most persuasive, and why?
13
OT420/430/620/630
4. In Exodus 25:8, The Lord says ‘Let them make me a sanctuary,
that I may dwell in their midst’. This statement expresses a
central theme of the Pentateuch: God’s presence with his
people. Trace the development of this theme throughout the
Pentateuch. In the final quarter of the essay, show how this
theme finds its climax in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
5. What contribution does Deuteronomy 34 make to (a) the
debate over the authorship of the Pentateuch, and (b) the
theological message of the Pentateuch?
Exegesis Paper
3000 words total
55% of final grade
Write ONE 3000-word Exegesis Paper on the Hebrew text of a
passage chosen from the following selection. You should
provide your own annotated translation of your chosen passage.
1. Genesis 32:23-33 (MT) (EV: 22-32) (Jacob wrestles with
God)
2. Exodus 3:13-22 (the revelation of the divine name)
3. Leviticus 26:1-13 (blessings for obedience)
4. Numbers 20:2-13 (Moses strikes the rock at Meribah)
5. Deuteronomy 30:1-6 (the end of exile)
Note also the specific instructions concerning Christian
interpretation and application below (‘Guide to
Assessments: Exegesis Paper’).
14
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
OT620 (English Text) Assessments Assessments are submitted online via Moodle.
In order to pass the unit, you must submit all assessment pieces and attain a mark of at
least 50% for the unit as a whole.
Late submission of assessment, without prior permission, will be taken into account in
determining your mark.
Your essays must also be within 10% of the required word limit and your ability to meet this
requirement will also be taken into account in determining your mark. QTC seeks to prepare
you for ministry, and in ministry delivering presentations on time & within an acceptable
length are essential skills.
ASSESSMENT TASK DESCRIPTION
Essay
3000 word essay
45% of the final grade
Write a 3000-word essay on ONE of the following topics:
1. On the question of whether Adam was the first human from
whom all subsequent humanity descended, Evangelical Old
Testament scholar John Walton writes:
… while the Bible could be read as suggesting that
Adam was the first human being, it is more debatable
whether it is making a scientific claim that would
controvert the possibility that modern humanity is
descended from a pool of common ancestors as
indicated by the genetic evidence. I would then
conclude that any contention that the Bible is making a
claim that Adam is the first human being or that all
humans are descended from him is debatable (John H.
Walton, The Lost World of Adam and Eve: Genesis 2–3
and the Human Origins Debate, 189)
Do you agree or disagree with Walton’s statement?
Summarize the different approaches to this question and
defend your own conclusions.
2. ‘The sin of the men of Sodom was not homosexuality but
heterosexual violence and/or a refusal to show hospitality’.
Argue for and against this statement from exegetical and
biblical-theological perspectives. Are there any other
interpretive options? Defend your own conclusions.
3. ‘Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go
to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering
on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you’ (Gen. 22:2).
This command cannot be reconciled with what the Bible says
elsewhere about child sacrifice. Moreover, in recent years
some scholars have insisted that the story of the near-
sacrifice of Isaac encourages child abuse. Offer a response to
these concerns. Assume that you are giving your answer to a
non-Christian.
15
OT420/430/620/630
4. What body of water did the Israelites pass through when
they made their exodus from Egypt – the Red Sea or the
Reed Sea? Does it matter? Why or why not? In particular
what is your assessment of James Hoffmeier’s argument that
Israel crossed el-Ballah Lake, which if it were still in existence,
would be to the north of today’s Suez Canal (Ancient Israel in
Sinai, 75-109)?
5. In explaining the rationale behind the Pentateuch’s
classification of animals as either clean or unclean, T.
Desmond Alexander writes,
‘A common factor among many of the unclean animals
is that they depend on the death of other creatures in
order to survive. A survey of animals that are declared
unclean reveals one feature that is common to most of
them: they eat meat. All the birds listed as unclean in
verses 13–19 [of Leviticus 11] are birds of prey; their
diet consists of the meat of other animals. The same is
true regarding the land animals; those designated
unclean have claws (e.g., cats and dogs), and such
animals are carnivorous. In marked contrast, cloven-
hoofed animals do not eat meat. This distinction
between carnivores and non-carnivores (or ruminants)
is emphasized by including the criterion of chewing the
cud. The idea that animals associated with death
should be viewed as unclean is in keeping with what
we have observed in chapter 17; in Leviticus, death and
uncleanness are generally linked, being the opposites
of life and holiness. By eating clean animals, the
Israelites distanced themselves from death, which was
perceived as the source of uncleanness’ (From Paradise
to the Promised Land: An Introduction to the
Pentateuch, 3rd ed., 261).
This is one among a number of explanations of the rationale
behind the clean/unclean distinction with respect to animals
(see Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14). Which proposal
makes the best sense of the data and why? And finally, what
relevance do these laws have for Christians?
Exegesis Paper
3600 words total
55% of the final grade
Write ONE 3600-word Exegesis Paper on the English text of a
passage chosen from the following selection:
1. Genesis 28:10-22 (Jacob’s dream at Bethel)
2. Exodus 34:29-35 (Moses’ shining face)
3. Leviticus 12:1-8 (purification after childbirth)
4. Numbers 17:1-12 (Aaron’s blossoming rod)
5. Deuteronomy 17:14-20 (the law of the king)
Note also the specific instructions concerning Christian
interpretation and application below (‘Guide to Assessments:
Exegesis Paper’).
16
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
OT630 (Hebrew Text) Assessments
Assessments are submitted online via Moodle.
In order to pass the unit, you must submit all assessment pieces and attain a mark of at
least 50% for the unit as a whole.
Late submission of assessment, without prior permission, will be taken into account in
determining your mark.
Your essays must also be within 10% of the required word limit and your ability to meet this
requirement will also be taken into account in determining your mark. QTC seeks to prepare
you for ministry, and in ministry delivering presentations on time & within an acceptable
length are essential skills.
ASSESSMENT TASK DESCRIPTION
Essay
3000 word essay
45% of the final grade
Write a 3000-word essay on ONE of the following topics:
1. On the question of whether Adam was the first human from
whom all subsequent humanity descended, Evangelical Old
Testament scholar John Walton writes:
… while the Bible could be read as suggesting that
Adam was the first human being, it is more debatable
whether it is making a scientific claim that would
controvert the possibility that modern humanity is
descended from a pool of common ancestors as
indicated by the genetic evidence. I would then
conclude that any contention that the Bible is making a
claim that Adam is the first human being or that all
humans are descended from him is debatable (John H.
Walton, The Lost World of Adam and Eve: Genesis 2–3
and the Human Origins Debate, 189)
Do you agree or disagree with Walton’s statement?
Summarize the different approaches to this question and
defend your own conclusions.
2. ‘The sin of the men of Sodom was not homosexuality but
heterosexual violence and/or a refusal to show hospitality’.
Argue for and against this statement from exegetical and
biblical-theological perspectives. Are there any other
interpretive options? Defend your own conclusions.
3. ‘Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go
to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering
on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you’ (Gen. 22:2).
This command cannot be reconciled with what the Bible says
elsewhere about child sacrifice. Moreover, in recent years
some scholars have insisted that the story of the near-
sacrifice of Isaac encourages child abuse. Offer a response to
these concerns. Assume that you are giving your answer to a
non-Christian.
4. What body of water did the Israelites pass through when
they made their exodus from Egypt – the Red Sea or the
Reed Sea? Does it matter? Why or why not? In particular
what is your assessment of James Hoffmeier’s argument that
17
OT420/430/620/630
Israel crossed el-Ballah Lake, which if it were still in existence,
would be to the north of today’s Suez Canal (Ancient Israel in
Sinai, 75-109)?
5. In explaining the rationale behind the Pentateuch’s
classification of animals as either clean or unclean, T.
Desmond Alexander writes,
‘A common factor among many of the unclean animals
is that they depend on the death of other creatures in
order to survive. A survey of animals that are declared
unclean reveals one feature that is common to most of
them: they eat meat. All the birds listed as unclean in
verses 13–19 [of Leviticus 11] are birds of prey; their
diet consists of the meat of other animals. The same is
true regarding the land animals; those designated
unclean have claws (e.g., cats and dogs), and such
animals are carnivorous. In marked contrast, cloven-
hoofed animals do not eat meat. This distinction
between carnivores and non-carnivores (or ruminants)
is emphasized by including the criterion of chewing the
cud. The idea that animals associated with death
should be viewed as unclean is in keeping with what
we have observed in chapter 17; in Leviticus, death and
uncleanness are generally linked, being the opposites
of life and holiness. By eating clean animals, the
Israelites distanced themselves from death, which was
perceived as the source of uncleanness’ (From Paradise
to the Promised Land: An Introduction to the
Pentateuch, 3rd ed., 261).
This is one among a number of explanations of the rationale
behind the clean/unclean distinction with respect to animals
(see Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14). Which proposal
makes the best sense of the data and why? And finally, what
relevance do these laws have for Christians?
Exegesis Paper
3600 words total
55% of the final grade
Write ONE 3600-word Exegesis Paper on the Hebrew text of a
passage chosen from the following selection. You should
provide your own annotated translation of your chosen passage.
1. Genesis 6:1-4 (the sons of God and the daughters of men)
2. Exodus 4:21-26 (the bridegroom of blood)
3. Leviticus 16:20-26 (the scapegoat)
4. Numbers 25:1-13 (the incident at Baal-Peor)
5. Deuteronomy 6:4-5 (the Shema)
Don’t be deceived by the brevity of most of these passages. They
contain some significant exegetical challenges that will require
research and careful analysis.
Note also the specific instructions concerning Christian
interpretation and application below (‘Guide to
Assessments: Exegesis Paper’).
18
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
Guide to Assessments General Remarks All students are expected to avail themselves of the guidelines for written assignments
provided in the ACT Handbook (consult the table of contents) and in the QTC Student
Handbook (beginning on page 31). Questions about assessments already covered in these
documents will not be treated as urgent, and failure to follow the provided guidelines may
significantly affect a student’s marks.
All written work for this course should conform to the guidelines of the SBL Handbook of Style
(with the exception of Australian spelling conventions).
All Hebrew and Greek cited must be typed in a Unicode font; SBL BibLit is commended as
one font covering Hebrew, Greek, and Roman Unicode ranges, but is not required. It is freely
available from the SBL website: http://sbl-site.org/educational/BiblicalFonts_SBLBibLit.aspx
Essay By grappling with one of the above essay topics, students are given the opportunity to
explore theological and ethical questions, together with exegetical and biblical-theological
issues, raised in the Pentateuch, and to do so in conversation with modern scholarship.
Students are expected to show thorough knowledge of the primary literature and engage
deeply and sympathetically with a broad range of secondary literature that bears on their
chosen topic.
Exegesis Paper Note: Students taking this unit on the Hebrew text (OT430 and OT630) must append an
annotated translation of each passage.
For this assessment, students must work closely with one chosen passage from the
Pentateuch, discussing the limits of the passage, structure, special issues of vocabulary and
syntax, text-critical issues as they bear on interpretation, with particular focus on its historical
and canonical context (i.e., its ancient Israelite context and its canonical location within the
Pentateuch).
Students are expected to show a thorough and detailed engagement of the details of the
text chosen for exegesis, with supporting engagement of secondary literature (especially on
disputed points of interpretation).
The appended bibliography provides a list of most of the academic commentaries held by
QTC’s library. Note that the commentaries that you should consult first are marked with an
asterisk. Most of these are in the conservative or moderately critical tradition. However, you
are strongly encouraged to go beyond this initial selection and refer to other commentaries
listed below. In addition to consulting the commentaries, you should also search the ATLA
and JSTOR databases and make use of any articles that might be relevant to your exegesis.
To that end, note the following:
1. Students in OT420 and 430: you are expected to interact with at least four academic
commentaries from the list below and at least two articles from journals or books other
than commentaries.
19
OT420/430/620/630
2. Students in OT620 and 630: you are expected to interact with at least six academic
commentaries from the list below and at least three articles from journals or books
other than commentaries.
On the use of commentaries and scholarly articles and essays:
1. Do your own exegesis of the text before you consult the commentators.
2. Make judicious use of the commentaries and other second material. Do not slavishly
follow one or two commentators. Use their insights to support your exegesis. That said, if
you find that no commentator agrees with your interpretation, you might want to pause
and ask yourself some hard questions.
3. Be aware of the scholar’s theological and hermeneutical perspective but at the same time
be open to gaining fresh insights from those outside your own theological tradition.
4. Recognize the strengths and weaknesses of scholarly commentaries and articles. An
example of strengths: academic commentaries usually engage in a close and careful
reading of the text. But they have weaknesses as well. They might skirt around the very
exegetical issue you want them to address. Or, when you move towards Christian
interpretation and application of the text (see below), you will often find academic
commentaries and other scholarly discussions of your text less useful. Why? Modern
scholarship tends to focus on what a text meant in its original context and is usually less
interested in what it means today for Christian audiences. That is not necessarily a bad
thing, but it’s important to understand what each commentary is seeking to achieve.
Important instruction: While the primary focus of this assignment is on exegesis and
interpretation, note the following instructions carefully.
You should devote about 75-85% of the essay to grammatical-historical exegesis of your
chosen text, i.e., what it would have meant to its original audience. In the final 15-25% of the
essay you should engage in:
(a) Christian reinterpretation of the text, by asking, does the Gospel of Jesus Christ – the
story of his life, death, resurrection, exaltation, outpouring of the Spirit etc. – make any
difference to my interpretation of the text? In other words, you will reinterpret the text
from a ‘full-canonical’ and post-resurrection, or ‘Christotelic’, perspective.
(b) Christian application of the text: in the light of both your grammatical-historical and ‘full-
canonical’ interpretation suggest a brief application. You are free to choose the setting
and audience you are addressing, e.g., sermon, evangelistic message, Bible study, in the
context of the church, university, youth group etc.
20
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
Learning Resources
Abbreviations (from the SBL Handbook of Style)
AB Anchor Bible
AOTC Abingdon Old Testament Commentaries
ApOTC Apollos Old Testament Commentary
ConcC Concordia Commentary
ECC Eerdmans Critical Commentary
IBC Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching
NIB The New Interpreter’s Bible. Edited by Leander E. Keck. Nashville: Abingdon
NAC New American Commentary
NCB New Century Bible
NIBCOT New International Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament
NICOT New International Commentary on the Old Testament
OTL Old Testament Library
SHBC Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary
TOTC Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries
WBC Word Biblical Commentary
Basic Course Textbook
Alexander, T. Desmond. From Paradise to Promised Land. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2012.
Additional Required Reading
See ‘Unit Timetable’ above for reading schedule. You should read the following articles and
be prepared to discuss them in class:
Cosmology
Greenwood, Kyle. Scripture and Cosmology: Reading the Bible Between the Ancient World and
Modern Science. Downers Grove: Intervarsity, 2015, 71-102 (= chapter 3: ‘Cosmology in
Scripture’).
The Image of God
Crouch, C. L. ‘Genesis 1:26–7 as a Statement of Humanity’s Divine Parentage.’ Journal of
Theological Studies 61 (2010): 1-15.
Was the Garden of Eden a Sanctuary (i.e., a Prototype of the Temple)?
Dumbrell, William J. ‘Genesis 2:1-17: A Foreshadowing of the New Creation.’ Pages 53-65 in
Biblical Theology: Retrospect and Prospect. Edited by Scott J. Hafemann. Downers Grove, IL:
InterVarsity, 2002.
Beale, Gregory K. ‘Eden, the Temple, and the Church’s Mission in the New Creation.’ Journal
of the Evangelical Theological Society 48 (2005): 5-31.
Block, Daniel I. ‘Eden: A Temple? A Reassessment of the Biblical Evidence.’ Pages 3-32 in From
Creation to New Creation: Biblical Theology and Exegesis. Essays in Honor of G. K. Beale. Edited
by D. M. Gurtner and B. L. Gladd. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2013.
21
OT420/430/620/630
The Kingdom of God
Waltke, Bruce. ‘The Kingdom of God in Biblical Theology.’ Pages 15-27 in Looking into the
Future: Evangelical Studies in Eschatology. Edited by David W. Baker. Grand Rapids: Baker,
2001.
McCartney, Dan G. ‘Ecce Homo: The Coming of the Kingdom as the Restoration of Human
Vicegerency.’ Westminster Theological Journal 56 (1994): 1-21.
A Messianic Hope?
Hamilton, James. ‘The Skull Crushing Seed of the Woman: Inner-Biblical Interpretation of
Genesis 3:15.’ The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 10:2 (Sum 2006): 30-54.
http://equip.sbts.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sbjt_102_sum06-hamilton.pdf
Israel and the Nations
Wright, Chris. ‘The Old Testament and Christian Mission.’ Evangel 14:2 (1996): 37-43.
Carrol R., M. Daniel. ‘Blessing the Nations: Toward a Biblical Theology of Mission from
Genesis.’ Bulletin for Biblical Research 10 (2000): 17-34.
The Land
Brueggemann, Walter. The Land: Place as Gift, Promise, and Challenge in Biblical Faith. 2nd ed.
Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002, 1-25 (= chapters 1 and 2).
Exodus and Biblical Theology
Dempster, Stephen G. ‘Exodus and Biblical Theology: On Moving into the Neighborhood with
a New Name.’ The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 12 (Fall 2008): 4-23.
http://www.otgateway.com/articles/SBJT_2008Fall2.pdf
Holiness and the Gospel
Wenham, Gordon J. ‘Christ’s Healing Ministry and His Attitude to the Law.’ Pages 115-26 in
Christ the Lord: Studies in Christology Presented to Donald Guthrie. Edited by Harold H.
Rowdon. Leicester: Inter-Varsity, 1982.
The Law
Barton, John. ‘Law and Narrative in the Pentateuch.’ Communio Viatorum 51 (2009): 126-140.
Block, Daniel I. ‘Preaching Old Testament Law to New Testament Christians.’ Pages 104-36 in
The Gospel according to Moses: Theological and Ethical Reflections on the Book of
Deuteronomy. Eugene, OT: Cascade, 2012.
22
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
Selected other useful reference works
Relevant articles in:
Alexander, T. Desmond and David W. Baker, eds. The Dictionary of the Pentateuch. Downers
Grove: InterVarsity, 2003.
Willem A. VanGemeren, ed., New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and
Exegesis. Carlisle: Paternoster, 1997.
On the Theology of the Pentateuch
Briggs, Richard S., and Joel N. Lohr, eds. A Theological Introduction to the Pentateuch:
Interpreting the Torah as Christian Scripture. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2012.
Clines, David J. A. The Theme of the Pentateuch. 2nd ed. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press,
1997.
Sailhamer, John H. The Meaning of the Pentateuch: Revelation, Composition and Interpretation.
Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2009.
________. The Pentateuch as Narrative: A Biblical-Theological Commentary. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 1995.
Watts, James W. Reading Law: The Rhetorical Shaping of the Pentateuch. The Biblical Seminar
59. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.
Commentaries and Other Relevant Studies
*Commentaries I recommend that you consult first are marked with an asterisk
Genesis
Commentaries:
Arnold, Bill T. Genesis. New Cambridge Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2009
Atkinson, David J. The Message of Genesis 1–11. The Bible Speaks Today 1. Leicester: Inter-
Varsity, 1990. DNH
Baldwin, Joyce G. The Message of Genesis 12–50. The Bible Speaks Today 2. Leicester: Inter-
Varsity, 1986.
Brueggemann, Walter. Genesis. IBC. Atlanta: John Knox, 1982.
Cassuto, Umberto. A Commentary on the Book of Genesis: Part 1: From Adam to Noah.
Genesis 1–6:8. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1961.
________. A Commentary on the Book of Genesis: Part 2: From Noah to Abraham. Genesis 6:9–
11:32. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1964.
Collins, C. John. Genesis 1–4: A Linguistic, Literary, and Theological Commentary. Phillipsburg,
NJ: P&R, 2006.
Cook, Joan. Genesis. New Collegeville Bible Commentary 2. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press,
2011.
Cotter, David W. Genesis. Berit Olam. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2003.
Currid, John D. A Study Commentary on Genesis, Volume 1: Genesis 1:1–25:18. Evangelical
Press Study Commentary. Darlington: Evangelical Press, 2003.
23
OT420/430/620/630
________. A Study Commentary on Genesis, Volume 2: Genesis 25:19–50:26. Evangelical Press
Study Commentary. Darlington, Evangelical Press, 2003.
Fretheim, Terence. ‘The Book of Genesis.’ Pages 319-674 in NIB Volume 1. Nashville:
Abingdon, 1994.
Goldingay, John. Genesis for Everyone: Part I. Chapters 1–16. Louisville: Westminster John
Knox, 2010.
________. Genesis for Everyone: Part II. Chapters 17–50. Louisville: Westminster John Knox,
2010.
Gunkel, Hermann. Genesis. Mercer Library of Biblical Studies. Macon, GA: Mercer, 1997.
*Hamilton, Victor P. The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17. NICOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1990.
*________. The Book of Genesis: Chapters 18-50. NICOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.
Hartley, John E. Genesis. NIBCOT 1. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2000. Repr., Grand Rapids:
Baker, 2008.
Kidner, Derek. Genesis. TOTC. Leicester: Inter-Varsity, 1967. Repr., Downers Grove, IL:
InterVarsity, 2008.
Kline, Meredith G. and Jonathan G Kline. Genesis: A New Commentary. Peabody, MA:
Hendrickson, 2016.
*Longman III, Tremper. Genesis. Story of God Bible Commentary 1. Grand Rapids: Zondervan,
2016.
*Mathews, Kenneth A. Genesis 1–11:26. NAC 1A. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1996.
*________. Genesis 11:27–50:26. NAC 1B. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2005.
McKeown, James. Genesis. Two Horizons Old Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans, 2008.
Rad, Gerhard von. Genesis. Rev. ed. OTL. Philadelphia: Westminster 1972.
Reno, R. R. Genesis. Brazos Theological Commentary. Grand Rapids: Brazos, 2010. DNH
Ross, Allen. Genesis. Cornerstone Biblical Commentary 1. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2008.
Sailhamer, John H. ‘Genesis.’ Pages 21-331 in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary Revised
Edition. Volume 1: Genesis to Leviticus. Edited by Tremper Longman III and David E. Garland.
Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008.
Sarna, Nahum M. Genesis. JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society,
1989.
Speiser, E. A. Genesis. AB 1. New York: Doubleday, 1964.
Turner, Laurence A. Genesis. 2nd ed. Readings. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2009.
*Waltke, Bruce W. Genesis: A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001.
*Walton, John H. Genesis. NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001.
Wenham, Gordon J. Genesis 1-15. WBC 1. Dallas: Word, 1987.
________. Genesis 16-50. WBC 2. Dallas: Word, 1994.
Westermann, Claus. Genesis 1–11: A Commentary. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984.
________. Genesis 12–36: A Continental Commentary. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1985.
24
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
________. Genesis 37–50: A Continental Commentary. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1986.
Additional Studies on Genesis:
Longman III, Tremper. How to Read Genesis. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity, 2005.
Moberly, R. Walter L. Theology of the Book of Genesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2009.
Exodus
Commentaries:
*Alexander, T. Desmond. Exodus. Teach the Text Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2016.
________. Exodus. ApOTC 2. Downers Grove, IL. InterVarsity, 2017.
Bruckner, James K. Exodus. NIBCOT 2. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2008. Repr., Grand Rapids:
Baker, 2012.
Brueggemann, Walter. ‘The Book of Exodus.’ Pages 675-981 in NIB, Volume 1. Nashville:
Abingdon, 1994.
Cassuto, Umberto. A Commentary on the Book of Exodus. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1967.
Childs, Brevard S. Exodus: A Commentary. OTL. London: SCM, 1974.
Cole, R. Alan Cole. Exodus. TOTC 2. London: Tyndale, 1973. Repr., Downers Grove, IL:
InterVarsity, 2008.
Currid, John D. A Study Commentary on Exodus, Vol. 1: Chapters 1–18. Evangelical Press Study
Commentary. Darlington: Evangelical Press, 2000.
________. A Study Commentary on Exodus, Vol. 2: Chapters 19–40. Evangelical Press Study
Commentary 1. Darlington: Evangelical Press, 2001.
Dozeman, Thomas B. Exodus. ECC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.
Durham, John I. Exodus. WBC 3. Waco, TX: Word, 1987.
*Enns, Peter. Exodus NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2000.
Fretheim, Terence E. Exodus. IBC. Louisville: John Knox, 1991.
Garrett, Duane. A Commentary on Exodus. Kregel Exegetical Library. Grand Rapids: Kregel,
2013.
Goldingay, John. Exodus and Leviticus for Everyone. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2010.
*Hamilton, Victor P. Exodus: An Exegetical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2011.
*Houtman, Cornelis. Exodus: Volume 1. Historical Commentary on the Old Testament. Leuven:
Peeters. 1993.
*________. Exodus: Volume 2. Historical Commentary on the Old Testament. Leuven: Peeters.
1996.
*________. Exodus: Volume 3. Historical Commentary on the Old Testament. Leuven: Peeters.
1999.
Hyatt, J. Philip. Exodus. NCB. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1971.
Johnstone, William H. Exodus 1–19, SHBC: Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys, 2014.
________. Exodus 20–40, SHBC. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys, 2015.
25
OT420/430/620/630
Kaiser, Walter C. ‘Exodus.’ Pages 331-561 in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary Revised Edition.
Volume 1: Genesis to Leviticus. Edited by Tremper Longman III and David E. Garland. Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, 2008.
Meyers, Carol. Exodus. New Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2005.
Motyer, Alec. The Message of Exodus. The Bible Speaks Today. Nottingham: Inter-Varsity,
2005.
Noth, Martin. Exodus: A Commentary. OTL. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1962.
Oswalt, John N. Exodus. Cornerstone Biblical Commentary 1. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2008.
Propp, William H. C. Exodus 1–18. AB 2. New York: Doubleday, 1999.
________. Exodus 19–40. AB 2A. New York: Doubleday, 2006.
Sarna, Nahum. Exodus. JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1991.
Smith, Mark S. Exodus. New Collegeville Bible Commentary 3. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical
Press, 2011.
Stuart, Douglas K. Exodus. NAC 2. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2006.
White, Thomas J. Exodus. Brazos Theological Commentary. Grand Rapids: Brazos, 2016.
Additional Studies on Exodus:
Longman III, Tremper. How to Read Exodus. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity, 2009.
Merida, Tony. Exalting Jesus in Exodus. Christ-Centered Exposition Commentary 2. Nashville,
B&H, 2014.
Perrin, Nicholas. The Exodus Revealed: Israel's Journey from Slavery to the Promised Land. New
York: Faith Words, 2014.
________. Finding Jesus in the Exodus: Christ in Israel's Journey From Slavery to the Promised
Land. New York: Faith Words, 2014.
Leviticus
Commentaries:
Bailey, Lloyd R. Leviticus-Numbers. SHBC 3. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys, 2005.
Baker, David W. Leviticus. Cornerstone Biblical Commentary 2. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2008.
Balentine, Samuel E. Leviticus. IBC. Louisville, KY: John Knox, 2002.
Bellinger, W. H. Leviticus, Numbers. NIBCOT 3. Peabody, MA, Hendrickson, 2001. Repr., Grand
Rapids: Baker, 2012.
Budd, Philip J. Leviticus. NCB. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996.
Currid, John D. A Study Commentary on Leviticus. Evangelical Press Study Commentary 1.
Darlington: Evangelical Press, 2005.
*Gane, Roy. Leviticus, Numbers. NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan,
2004.
Gerstenberger, Erhard S. Leviticus: A Commentary. OTL. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox,
1996.
Harrison, R. K. Leviticus. TOTC. Leicester: Inter-Varsity, 1980.
26
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
*Hartley, John E. Leviticus. WBC 4. Dallas: Word, 1992.
Hess, Richard S. ‘Leviticus.’ Pages 563-826 in in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary Revised
Edition. Volume 1: Genesis to Leviticus. Edited by Tremper Longman III and David E. Garland.
Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008.
Kaiser, Walter. ‘The Book of Leviticus.’ Pages 983-1191 in NIB. Volume 1. Nashville: Abingdon,
1994.
*Kiuchi, Nobuyoshi. Leviticus. ApOTC 3. Leicester: IVP, 2007.
Kleinig, John W. Leviticus. ConcC. St. Louis, MO: Concordia, 2003.
Levine, Baruch A. Leviticus. JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society,
1989.
*Milgrom, Jacob. Leviticus 1–16. AB 3. New York: Doubleday, 1991.
*________. Leviticus 17–22. AB 3A. New York: Doubleday, 2000.
*________. Leviticus 23–27. AB 3B. New York: Doubleday, 2000.
Noth, Martin. Leviticus: A Commentary. OTL. London: SCM, 1962.
Owens, J. Edward, Leviticus. New Collegeville Bible Commentary 4. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical
Press, 2011.
Radner, Ephraim. Leviticus. Brazos Theological Commentary. Grand Rapids: Brazos, 2008.
Rooker, Mark F. Leviticus. NAC 3A. Nashville: B&H, 2000.
Sherwood, Stephen K. Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy. Berit Olam. Collegeville, MN:
Liturgical Press, 2002.
*Sklar, Jay. Leviticus. TOTC 3. Downers Grove, IL. InterVarsity, 2013.
Sprinkle, Joe M. Leviticus and Numbers. Teach the Text Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker,
2015.
Tidball, Derek. The Message of Leviticus. The Bible Speaks Today. Leicester: Inter-Varsity, 2005.
*Wenham Gordon J. The Book of Leviticus. NICOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979.
Willis, Timothy M. Leviticus. ABOTC. Nashville: Abingdon, 2009.
Additional Studies on Leviticus:
Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966. See especially chapter 3, ‘The Abominations of Leviticus’.
Moseley, Allan. Exalting Jesus in Leviticus. Christ-Centered Exposition Commentary
3. Nashville, B&H, 2015.
Trevaskis, Leigh M. Holiness, Ethics and Ritual in Leviticus. Hebrew Bible Monographs.
Sheffield: Phoenix, 2011.
27
OT420/430/620/630
Numbers
Commentaries:
Allen, Ronald B. ‘Numbers.’ Pages 23-458 in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary Revised Edition.
Volume 2: Numbers-Ruth. Edited by Tremper Longman III and David E. Garland. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 2012.
*Ashley, Timothy R. The Book of Numbers. NICOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993.
Bailey, Lloyd R. Leviticus-Numbers. SHBC 3. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys, 2005.
Bellinger, W. H. Leviticus, Numbers. NIBCOT 3. Peabody, MA, Hendrickson, 2001. Repr., Grand
Rapids: Baker, 2012.
Brown, Raymond. The Message of Numbers. The Bible Speaks Today. Nottingham: Inter-
Varsity, 2002.
Brueggemann, Dale A. Numbers. Cornerstone Biblical Commentary 2. Carol Stream, IL:
Tyndale, 2008.
Budd, Philip J. Numbers. Word Biblical Commentary 5. Waco, TX: Word, 1984.
*Cole, R. Dennis. Numbers. NAC 3B. Nashville: B&H, 2000.
Davies, Eryl W. Numbers. NCB. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.
Dozeman, Thomas B. ‘Numbers.’ Pages 1-268 in NIB. Volume 2. Nashville: Abingdon, 1998.
Gane, Roy. Leviticus, Numbers. NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2004.
Goldingay, John. Numbers and Deuteronomy for Everyone. Nashville: Westminster John Knox,
2010.
Harrison, R. K. Numbers. Wycliffe Exegetical Commentary. Chicago, Moody, 1990.
Levine, Baruch A. Numbers 1–20. AB 4. New York: Doubleday, 1993.
________. Numbers 21–36. AB 4A. New York: Doubleday, 2000.
Milgrom, Jacob. Numbers. JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society,
1990.
Nowell, Irene. Numbers. New Collegeville Bible Commentary 5. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical
Press, 2011.
*Olson, Dennis T. Numbers. IBC. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1996.
Sherwood, Stephen K. Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy. Berit Olam. Collegeville, MN:
Liturgical Press, 2002.
Sprinkle, Joe M. Leviticus and Numbers. Teach the Text Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker,
2015.
*Wenham, Gordon J. Numbers. TOTC. Leicester: IVP, 1981.
Additional Studies on Numbers:
Duguid, Iain. Numbers: God’s Presence in the Wilderness. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2006.
Olson, Dennis T. The Death of the Old and the Birth of the New: The Framework of the Book of
Numbers and the Pentateuch. Brown Judaic Studies 71. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1985.
28
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
Deuteronomy
Commentaries:
Biddle, Mark E. Deuteronomy. SHBC. Macon, GA, Smyth & Helwys, 2003.
*Block, Daniel I. Deuteronomy. NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2012.
Brueggemann, Walter. Deuteronomy. AOTC. Nashville: Abingdon, 2001.
Brown, Raymond. The Message of Deuteronomy. The Bible Speaks Today. Leicester: Inter-
Varsity, 1993.
Christensen, Duane L. Deuteronomy 1-21:9. 2nd ed. WBC 6A. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2001.
________. Deuteronomy 21:10-34:12. WBC 6B. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2002.
Clements, Ronald I. ‘Deuteronomy.’ Pages 209-528 in NIB. Volume 2. Nashville: Abingdon,
1998.
*Cook, Stephen L. Reading Deuteronomy: A Literary and Theological Commentary. Macon, GA:
Smyth and Helwys, 2015.
*Craigie, Peter C. The Book of Deuteronomy. NICOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1976.
Goldingay, John. Numbers and Deuteronomy for Everyone. Nashville: Westminster John Knox,
2010.
Grisanti, Michael A. ‘Deuteronomy.’ Pages 457-814 in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary
Revised Edition. Volume 2: Numbers-Ruth. Edited by Tremper Longman III and David E.
Garland. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2012.
Lundbom, Jack R. Deuteronomy: A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2013.
Mays, A. D. H. Deuteronomy. NCB. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979.
McConville, J. Gordon. Deuteronomy. ApOTC. Leicester: Apollos, 2002
Merrill, Eugene H. Deuteronomy. NAC 4. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1994.
________. Deuteronomy. Cornerstone Biblical Commentary 2. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2008.
Miller, Patrick. Deuteronomy. IBC. John Knox, 1990.
Nelson, Richard D. Deuteronomy. OTL. Louisville, KY. Westminster John Knox, 2002.
Owens, J. Edward. Deuteronomy. New Collegeville Bible Commentary 6. Collegeville, MN:
Liturgical Press, 2010.
Rad, Gerhard von. Deuteronomy. OTL. London: SCM, 1966.
Sherwood, Stephen K. Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy. Berit Olam. Collegeville, MN:
Liturgical Press, 2002.
Thompson, J. A. Deuteronomy TOTC. Leicester: Inter-Varsity, 1974.
Tigay, Jeffrey. Deuteronomy. JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society,
1996.
Weinfeld, Moshe. Deuteronomy 1–11. AB 5. New York: Doubleday, 1991.
Woods, Edward J. Deuteronomy. TOTC. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2011.
Work, Telford. Deuteronomy. Brazos Theological Commentary. Grand Rapids: Brazos, 2009.
*Wright, Christopher J. H. Deuteronomy. NIBCOT 4. Peabody: Hendricksen, 1996. Repr., Grand
Rapids: Baker, 2012.
29
OT420/430/620/630
Additional Studies on Deuteronomy
Block, Daniel I. The Gospel according to Moses: Theological and Ethical Reflections on the Book
of Deuteronomy. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2012.
Firth, David G., and Philip S. Johnston, eds. Interpreting Deuteronomy: Issues and Approaches.
Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2012.
McConville, J. Gordon. Law and Theology in Deuteronomy. Journal for the Study of the Old
Testament Supplement 33. Sheffield: JSOT, 1984.
McConville, J. Gordon, and J. Gary Millar. Time and Place in Deuteronomy Journal for the
Study of the Old Testament Supplement 179. Sheffield: JSOT, 1994.
Millar, J. Gary. Now Choose Life: Theology and Ethics in Deuteronomy. New Studies in Biblical
Theology 6. Downers Grove: IVP, 2001.
30
INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS The Kingdom of God: Studies in Luke
THE PENTATEUCH
ACT Standards: Grades
Grades in assessment instruments are awarded in the following categories-
Grade Score GPA
Fail (F) 0-49% 0
Pass (P) 50-57% 1
Pass+ (P+) 58-64% 1.5
Credit (C) 65-74% 2
Distinction (D) 75-84% 3
High Distinction (HD) 85+% 4