Multi-Period Performance Persistence Analysis of Hedge Funds
Organizational Study of Hedge Equities - baixardoc
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of Organizational Study of Hedge Equities - baixardoc
1
MAHATMA GANDHI
UNIVERSITY
RAJAGIRI COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
STUDIES
A PROJECT REPORT ON
“ORGANISATIONAL STUDY OF HEDGE
EQUITIES LTD.”
IN THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF DEGREE
MASTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (2013-2015)
SUBMITTED BY
APARNA HARI
ROLL NO. 1379
2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, I thank Almighty God for all His blessings.
With regard to my Organisational Study and Project on Mutual Fund I
would like to thank each and every one who offered help, guideline and
support whenever required.
First and foremost I would like to express gratitude to my
Trainer Mr. Benil D. Alex, Head of Accounts Department, Mr. Sajin
Francis other staff of Hedge Equities Ltd. for their support and guidance
in the Project work. I am extremely grateful to my guide, Mr. Abraham
Joseph for his valuable guidance and timely suggestions.
And lastly, I would like to express my gratefulness to the parent‟s for
seeing me through it all.
3
LIST OF CONTENTS
SERIAL NO. TITLE PAGE NO.
List of Tables 4
List of Figures 6
1. Section 1- Organisational
Study
8
2. Chapter 1- Introduction 9
3. Chapter 2- Company Profile 16
4. Section 2- Problems Centred
Study
37
5. Chapter 1- Problem
Formulation
38
6. Chapter 2- Research Process 56
7. Chapter 3- Presentation and
Analysis of Data
63
8. Chapter 4- Interpretation and
Conclusions
82
9. Chapter 5- Suggestions/
Recommendations
84
Bibliography 87
Annexure 88
4
LIST OF TABLES
FIGURE NO TITLE PAGE NO
3.1
SHOWING AGE DISTRIBUTION OF INVESTORS
64
3.2
RESPONSE SHOWING OCCUPATION OF INVESTORS
65
3.3
RESPONSE SHOWING MONTHLY INCOME OF
INVESTORS
66
3.4
RESPONSE SHOWING HOW MANY INVESTORS HAS
MADE INVESTMENTS.
67
3.5
RESPONSE SHOWING THE VARIOUS INVESTMENTS
MADE BY INVESTORS
68
3.6
RESPONSE SHOWING PREFERENCE OF FACTORS
WHILE INVESTING
69
3.7
RESPONSE SHOWING NUMBER OF INVESTORS AWARE
ABOUT MUTUAL FUNDS
70
3.8
RESPONSE SHOWING THE VARIOUS SOURCES OF
INFORMATION FOR INVESTORS ABOUT MUTUAL
FUNDS
71
3.9
RESPONSE SHOWING NUMBER OF INVESTORS WHO
MADE INVESTMENTS IN MUTUAL FUNDS
72
3.10
RESPONSE SHOWING THE REASONS FOR NOT
INVESTING IN MUTUAL FUNDS
73
3.11
RESPONSE SHOWING INVESTOR PREFERENCE
TOWARDS DIFFERENT PLANS
74
3.12
RESPONSE SHOWING PREFERENCE OF INEVSTORS
REGARDING THE HOLDING PERIOD OF MUTUAL FUND
INVESTMENTS
75
3.13
RESPONSE SHOWING INVESTOR PREFERENCE
TOWARDS DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND SCHEMES
76
3.14
RESPONSE SHOWING THE RISK PERCEPTION OF
INVESTORS TOWARDS MUTUAL FUNDS
77
5
3.15
RESPONSE SHOWING THE PREFERRED CHANNEL OF
INVESTMENT AMONG INVESTORS
78
3.16
RESPONSE SHOWING PREFERRED MODE OF
INVESTMENT AMONG INVESTORS
79
3.17
RESPONSE SHOWING WHETHER THE INVESTORS ARE
SATISFIED WITH THEIR CURRENT MUTUAL FUND
SCHEMES
80
6
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO TITLE PAGE NO
3.1
SHOWING AGE DISTRIBUTION OF INVESTORS
64
3.2
RESPONSE SHOWING OCCUPATION OF
INVESTORS
65
3.3
RESPONSE SHOWING MONTHLY INCOME OF
INVESTORS
66
3.4
RESPONSE SHOWING HOW MANY INVESTORS
HAS MADE INVESTMENTS.
67
3.5
RESPONSE SHOWING THE VARIOUS
INVESTMENTS MADE BY INVESTORS
68
3.6
RESPONSE SHOWING PREFERENCE OF FACTORS
WHILE INVESTING
69
3.7
RESPONSE SHOWING NUMBER OF INVESTORS
AWARE ABOUT MUTUAL FUNDS
70
3.8
RESPONSE SHOWING THE VARIOUS SOURCES OF
INFORMATION FOR INVESTORS ABOUT
MUTUAL FUNDS
71
3.9
RESPONSE SHOWING NUMBER OF INVESTORS
WHO MADE INVESTMENTS IN MUTUAL FUNDS
72
3.10
RESPONSE SHOWING THE REASONS FOR NOT
INVESTING IN MUTUAL FUNDS
73
3.11
RESPONSE SHOWING INVESTOR PREFERENCE
TOWARDS DIFFERENT PLANS
74
3.12
RESPONSE SHOWING PREFERENCE OF
INEVSTORS REGARDING THE HOLDING PERIOD
OF MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENTS
75
7
3.13
RESPONSE SHOWING INVESTOR PREFERENCE
TOWARDS DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND SCHEMES
76
3.14
RESPONSE SHOWING THE RISK PERCEPTION OF
INVESTORS TOWARDS MUTUAL FUNDS
77
3.15
RESPONSE SHOWING THE PREFERRED CHANNEL
OF INVESTMENT AMONG INVESTORS
78
3.16
RESPONSE SHOWING PREFERRED MODE OF
INVESTMENT AMONG INVESTORS
79
3.17
RESPONSE SHOWING WHETHER THE INVESTORS
ARE SATISFIED WITH THEIR CURRENT MUTUAL
FUND SCHEMES
80
10
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The Indian Broking industry has grown rapidly in the past couple of years.
Financial intermediaries have played a significant role in recovering the chaotic
economic conditions in the recent years and this has therefore given a new life to the
broking industry in the financial sector. Increased competition and newer
opportunities have been a driving force for the changes in the trading pattern,
improvement in technology, diversification of operations and introduction of new
products. The various investor awareness programs and regulations have also
contributed to creating an environment that is favourable for the growth of the
Broking industry in India.
The advent of technology has resulted in rapid increase in the internet-
based broking segment. This rapid growth of online trading in terms of size and
volume has resulted in easy accessibility and faster facilitation through various
technological platforms. A major trend of consolidation is also seen in the current
scenario, as many small stock broking firms find it difficult to retain their clients due
to difficulties in providing value added services.
According to ICRA, in its earlier reports on the Brokerage Sector in FY12-
13- „The industry is witnessing signs of consolidation. The market share of the top
100 brokers on the NSE has increased substantially to ~89% as at August 2013 from
77% as at March 2013 and 73% as at March 2011. With companies needing to
continuously spend on upgrading their technology framework, the current
environment provides opportunity for the larger players to further consolidate their
positions. Further, we believe that the mid-sized brokers are being forced to cut back
and shut businesses in those areas where they do not have scale whereas some of the
smaller brokers face survival issues.‟