Mixing and Thinning of Coatings - CiteSeerX

16
1 InspectThis! Summer 2014 Supplement to CoatingsPro Magazine Summer 2014 thinning is required on all coatings and is critical when mixing and thinning co-reactant type coatings. Co-reactant coatings must be mixed in the proper ratio as directed by the coating manufacturer. If the ratio is off, the coating will not cure properly and will not have its intended characteristics. Even though mixing and thinning of a coating may seem like a simple task that is not all that important to the untrained individual, it can make the difference between a successful outcome or a major problem for the contractor and owner.! IN THIS ISSUE... From the Chairman .......................................... 1 Safety in Abrasive Blasting and Painting ..2 Coatings and Cathodic Protection ............ 5 NACE International Initiates Global Study on Corrosion Costs ................................... 6 Get This! ................................................................ 7 NACE Coatings Course Schedule ............. 8 Coatings Resources ....................................... 10 Mixing and Thinning of Coatings By Malcolm McNeil, CIP Committee Chair “C a rry a can of MEK (methyl ethyl ketone) and you won’t have to worry about having the right thinner because MEK will thin almost anything.” We often hear someone make a remark similar to this regarding one thinner or another. Many applicators believe these statements. I was inspecting some tanks that were being coated in a contractor’s facility before being shipped to their final destination. Things had been going pretty well with the specified degree of blast cleanliness and profile being achieved, and the coatings being applied properly with satisfactory cure. Then I received a call from the shop reporting that the last couple of tanks that had been topcoated three days ago were still tacky. I made the trip to the shop and checked the tanks in question. Sure enough, the topcoat was still tacky and had not cured properly. In questioning the appli- cator I asked if he had reduced the coating as directed in the manufacturer’s product data sheet (PDS). He indicated that he had reduced it 10% as called for in the PDS. I then asked if he used the solvent called for in the PDS. His answer solved the mystery as to why the coating did not cure. He said he was out of the recommended solvent so he used MEK because MEK will work with any coating. A call to the coating manufacturer revealed that MEK was not compatible with this coating and would indeed interfere with the curing. This was another example of the myth of MEK as a universal solvent. As coating inspectors, it is our responsibility to ensure that the correct solvents are used and in the proper amount. Unfortunately this project was “hold point inspection” rather than “full time inspection” and the material had been mixed when I was not scheduled to be on the job. The uncured coatings had to be removed and the tanks repainted. This cost the contractor a percentage of his profit and could have easily been prevented if the applicator had received the proper training on mixing and thinning of the coatings. I have experienced this same type of situa- tion on numerous projects over the years. If applicators do not receive the proper train- ing, we cannot expect them to do the job correctly. Most often it is the least trained appli- cator on the crew who is charged with the responsibility of mixing and thinning the coatings before application. Due to this lack of training, mistakes are often made that can cause coatings failures. Proper mixing and As coating inspectors, it is our responsibility to ensure that the correct solvents are used and in the proper amount.

Transcript of Mixing and Thinning of Coatings - CiteSeerX

1 InspectThis! Summer 2014

Supplement to CoatingsPro Magazine Summer 2014

t h i n n i n g i s r e q u i r e d on all coatings and is critical when mixing and thinning co-reactant type coatings. Co-reactant coatings must be mixed in the proper ratio as directed by the coating manufacturer. If the ratio is off, the coating will not cure properly and will not have its intended characteristics.

Even though mixing and thinning of a coating may seem like a simple task that is not all that important to the untrained individual, it can make the difference between a successful outcome or a major problem for the contractor and owner.!

IN THIS ISSUE...

From the Chairman .......................................... 1

Safety in Abrasive Blasting and Painting ..2

Coatings and Cathodic Protection ............ 5

NACE International Initiates Global Study on Corrosion Costs ................................... 6

Get This! ................................................................ 7

NACE Coatings Course Schedule ............. 8

Coatings Resources ....................................... 10

Mixing and Thinning of CoatingsBy Malcolm McNeil, CIP Committee Chair

“Ca rry a can o f M E K ( m e t h y l

ethyl ketone) and you won’t have to worry about having the right thinner because MEK will thin almost anything.”

We often hear someone make a remark similar to this regarding one thinner or another. Many applicators believe these statements.

I was inspecting some tanks that were being coated in a contractor’s facility before being shipped to their final destination. Things had been going pretty well with the specified degree of blast cleanliness and profile being achieved, and the coatings being applied properly with satisfactory cure. Then I received a call from the shop reporting that the last couple of tanks that had been topcoated three days ago were still tacky. I made the trip to the shop and checked the tanks in question. Sure enough, the topcoat was still tacky and had not cured properly. In questioning the appli-cator I asked if he had reduced the coating as directed in the manufacturer’s product data sheet (PDS). He indicated that he had reduced it 10% as called for in the PDS. I then asked if he used the solvent called for in the PDS. His answer solved the mystery

as to why the coating did not cure. He said he was out of the recommended solvent so he used MEK because MEK will work with any coating. A call to the coating manufacturer revealed that MEK was not compatible with this coating and would indeed interfere with the curing.

This was another example of the myth of MEK as a universal solvent. As coating inspectors, it is our responsibility to ensure that the correct solvents are used and in the proper amount. Unfortunately this project was “hold point inspection” rather than “full time inspection” and the material had been mixed when I was not scheduled to be on the job. The uncured coatings had to be removed and the tanks repainted. This cost the contractor a percentage of his profit and could have easily been prevented if the applicator had received the proper training on mixing and thinning of the coatings. I have experienced this same type of situa-tion on numerous projects over the years. If applicators do not receive the proper train-ing, we cannot expect them to do the job correctly.

Most often it is the least trained appli-cator on the crew who is charged with the responsibility of mixing and thinning the coatings before application. Due to this lack of training, mistakes are often made that can cause coatings failures. Proper mixing and

As coating inspectors, it is our responsibility to ensure that the correct solvents are used

and in the proper amount.

2 InspectThis! Summer 2014

user from breathing in harmful particulates such as silica sand, coal slag, and copper slag. Quartz and metal particulates can be present, depending on the selected abrasive, and all are pulverized into a fine dust capable of being ingested by the user and those in close proximity. Positive pressure

within the blast hood keeps the particu-lates out and provides clean, breathable air. Breathing air must meet Grade D require-ments as defined by the Compressed Gas Association.

When using diesel- or gasoline-driven compressors, carbon monoxide (CO) monitors and CO alarms are required to be installed within the system to monitor the quality of the air and warn the user when excessive levels of CO are present. Compressors should have high-temperature alarms that sound when the unit is overheat-ing, since overheating can produce CO.

The use of respirators is common, but for them to be effective and safe, the user must be tested for respirator fit and pulmonary function. A respirator fit test performed by a competent professional will ensure that the user is wearing the correct size and type of respirator for the task. Every face is different and each user needs the best fit available to keep out harmful vapors and particulates. A pulmonary function test is performed to ensure the individual has the lung capacity to breathe through a respira-tor. Cases are documented where deaths are caused by breathing difficulty and resis-tance during respirator use.

Hoses should always be in good condi-tion and free of holes, dry rot, and weak areas. Paint lines should be rated for the pressures they carry, and fittings should be checked for tightness prior to each use. Air hoses should be used in combination with whip checks and safety pins. Gaskets need to be checked regularly during a visual inspection prior to use. Since air hoses and paint lines are used in combination with valves, valves should be checked to ensure they have handles in good condition and function properly.

Safety in Abrasive Blasting and Painting By Ken Judice, Jr., Hill Country Consulting and Inspection, Inc., New Braunfels, Texas

I do not often read about safe working practices in the protective coating indus-try but safety measures are critical when

preparing and coating a substrate.Let’s start with the basics: compressed

air for breathing. Abrasive blasting requires an air supply and blast hood to prevent the

Summer 2014 InspectThis! 3

a SPYfor

For more details on SPY® products and our complete line of SPY® Holiday Detection Equipment visit our website @ www.picltd.com.

PIPELINE INSPECTION COMPANY, LTD. PH: (713) 681-5837 • FAX: (713) 681-4838

SPY® Model 780, 785 and 790Portable Holiday Detectors• New ergonomic design

• Pipe coating inspections up to 60”

• Extremely durable

• Infinite voltage setting on the fly

Compact,lightweightwet sponge

holidaydetectors

Reliable continuous inspectionson the assembly line

every missionInspect Any Metal Surface Coating

For pipes, tanks or any coated contoured surface in the field or inside your manufacturingfacility, we simplify coating integrity testing

with our full line of SPY® portable and permanent Holiday Detectors.

SPY® Wet Sponge PortableHoliday Detectors• No belts, lightweight, fast set up

• Sponge roller speeds large flatsurface area inspections

• Interchangeable flat or roller sponge

SPY® In-Plant Holiday Detector Systems• Custom designed to streamline

manufacturing

• From pipecoating inspections to large flat surfaces

EveryMission 1/18/07 9:47 PM Page 1

While abrasive blasting and painting, long-sleeved shirts, pants, gloves, and steel-toe shoes or boots are required in addition to respirators and blast hoods. Painting and blasting involve high pressures and impact with surfaces. Additionally, some paints and thinners can cause severe burns, so protec-tive clothing should always be worn to prevent contact with exposed skin.

When working within a confined space that involves blasting and paint-ing, individuals must be familiar with the associated hazards of this work. Limited means of access and egress, explosive atmospheres, and small, confined areas are just a few possible hazardous scenarios. Lighting should be explosion proof, and adequate ventilation to exhaust harmful vapors and introduce fresh air are absolute musts. Confined space training will help individuals understand the requirements for working within such areas.

Workers must be familiar with who will provide rescue if needed and how to contact them. Response to emergency situations should be planned in advance, with as much rescue equipment as possible available on site. Ropes, rescue harnesses, first aid kits, and a backboard are some common items to include. Continuous atmospheric monitor-ing is crucial to determine dangerous and explosive levels of poisonous gas, toxic vapors, and low oxygen content. A hole watch must be provided at the entrance, and workers entering the area must be recorded and maintained in real time so that every-one is accounted for.

Fire extinguishers should be readily available near combustible materials and equipment that could produce a spark. Workers should ensure that enough fire extinguishers are present, that they are inspected regularly, and that personnel are trained in their use.

Training for operating equipment such as manlifts, scissor lifts, forklifts, and cranes is a requirement. Personnel who operate this equipment must be properly trained to do so and able to demonstrate correct use of each type of equipment. Manlifts and forklifts are common in blasting and paint-ing operations and can put personnel at risk when used improperly.

Working at heights encompasses ladders, scaffolding, manlifts, and person-nel baskets. Fall protection equipment and training for its proper use are required for all personnel working at heights above 6 ft (1.8 m). Anchors must support a minimum specified weight, harnesses must be positioned correctly on the wearer to prevent damage, and this equipment

4 InspectThis! Summer 2014

should be inspected daily prior to each use to identify defects such as frayed stitching, tears, etc. When a worker is required to move around at heights above 6 ft, 100% tie-off should be maintained, which requires two lanyards to comply. The lanyards should always be fastened and the anchor point checked to ensure it can support the shock load. The area below should be barri-caded to prevent personnel from walking

and working beneath the elevated work area since dropped objects are common during this work.

Ladders should always be on level surfaces, and tied off or heeled when workers are standing on them. Ladder selec-tion is equally important. Single, extension, and folding ladders all have different uses. Scaffolding should be erected and inspected by competent personnel, with inspections

performed daily. Altering of scaffolds by personnel not properly trained to do so is unsafe. Scaffold tags should be placed on each one and updated accordingly to show the requirements to work from them. Working from manlifts is unique. Workers should be aware that manufacturers do not recommend remaining tie off to manlifts when working outside of them. Personnel baskets should be properly designed and display working load and capacity. Trial lifts are required before lifting personnel, and cranes should never be in motion (travel-ing) when personnel are inside baskets at elevated heights.

Most companies have a written safety policy specific to the work they perform. Workers should ensure that their company has a policy that addresses the hazards associated with blasting and painting since some of the risks are unique to this trade. If a policy does not exist, then the worker should put the employer on notice and assist with its development. Finally, policies are not worth the paper they are printed on if they don’t have the full support of upper management and are not enforced. Support from upper management is key and the workers’ safety observations and actions will make or break the program. Much is to be gained by having and follow-ing a solid safety policy. A company with a good safety record is the company that continually secures the coating contracts. More importantly, the risk to the workforce is minimized, the employer and employee are less likely to suffer the financial conse-quences of injury or death, and everyone can go home at the end of their shift and enjoy family or hobbies. The family members will be thankful for that! !

Summer 2014 InspectThis! 5

Coatings and cathodic protection (CP) have often stood on opposite sides of the fence as mutually

exclusive and opposing approaches to corrosion protection. Proponents of coatings are often on one side discounting the advantages of CP and claiming that a good, well-applied coating is the only neces-sary protection for steel. On the other side are proponents of CP, who often claim that any immersed or buried metal structure can best be protected by a well-engineered CP installation. In some conditions, both sides may be correct in their assertions. However, under many more commonly occurring conditions, the ideal corrosion protection is actually a combination of both protection concepts.

CP and coatings are both engineer-ing disciplines with the primary purpose of mitigating and preventing corrosion.1Each process is different. CP prevents corrosion by introducing electrical currents from external sources to counteract the normal electrochemical corrosion reactions. Coatings form a barrier to prevent the flow of corrosion current between the naturally occurring anodes and cathodes or within galvanic couples. Each of these processes has been successful in its own right. Coatings by far represent the most widespread method of general corrosion prevention. CP, however, has protected hundreds of thousands of miles of pipe and acres of steel surface subject to buried or immersion conditions.

As corrosion protection has become more critical, and all types of metal struc-tures more valuable, a marriage of the two corrosion prevention systems has naturally occurred. Experience has shown that damage to organically coated structures is almost unavoidable during construction and service. Breaks or holidays in coatings expose metal surfaces to corrosion, particu-larly in underground or immersion service. Attempts to eliminate all coating holidays drastically increases costs and are usually

unwarranted. Thus, under many condi-tions, the combination of both systems actually provides better, more reliable, and, in many cases, less costly corrosion protec-tion.

In the case of coatings for use with CP, it is necessary to use those coatings that are based on the impervious coating concept. This is because wherever coatings are used in connection with CP, they generally must be either immersed or in moist underground conditions. Without immersion or moisture, the CP mechanism will not operate properly.

The impervious coating concept requires the coating to be relatively imper-vious to the transfer of moisture, oxygen, air, and the various ions that may be in contact with the coating. Also, it must be resistant to the passage of electrons or electric current so that it forms an imper-vious film over the surface to be protected. The coating is not fully impervious to moisture vapor. Each coating material has a moisture vapor transfer rate characteris-tic of that particular material. Nevertheless, the coatings used in connection with CP are much more impervious than those types of coatings used in atmospheric exposures.

To obtain maximum corrosion resis-tance from the combination of coatings and CP, a number of factors, which have a basic influence on their combined effectiveness, must be taken into consideration.

1. Application of coatings needs to be done in the best possible manner, with excellent surface preparation. Poor applica-tion and poor surface preparation can only lead to coating failure under the influence of cathodic current by either hydrogen or electroendosmotic blistering.2. For the coatings to be effective, they must be highly dielectric and must maintain such dielectric properties over their entire life.3. Coatings must be highly chemical-resis-tant, particularly toward alkalies, because of the strong buildup of hydroxyl ions by the cathodic current. Any coatings that have even a small tendency to saponify, or which contain pigments that are alkali reactive, should not be used.4. Coatings should have a low moisture absorption and a low moisture transfer rate, in addition to being di-electric, in order to prevent hydrogen blistering under the cathodic current.5. Optimum coating thickness is essential in order to act as a longtime barrier and insula-tor for the cathodic current. Each coating has its own optimum thickness. However, in general, it can be stated that the thicker the coating (based on its own inherent proper-ties), the better the results when used with CP.6. It is indicated that antifouling coatings using alkali-resistant resins and pigments, applied over a proper dielectric coating, are not affected by the application of CP poten-tials.7. From all evidence, indicated from actual tests as well as field installation, the cathodic potential, where used in connection with coatings, should be below –1 V, and the optimum potential is –0.085 V.

If these factors are taken into consider-ation, the results of both laboratory testing and actual use of the combined system indicate that maximum corrosion protec-tion can be obtained through the use of coatings and CP. !

Coatings and Cathodic Protection This article is an excerpt from C.G. Munger’s Corrosion Prevention by Protective Coatings, now in its third revision

by Associate Author Louis D. Vincent Ph.D. The third edition of the book will be released in Summer 2014.

The boot-topping of large tankers is an area where the combination of coatings and CP has proven advantageous.

Reference

1. C.G. Munger, R.C. Robinson, “Coatings and Cathodic Protection,” MP 7 (1981).

6 InspectThis! Summer 2014

NACE International has announced the commencement of its new global study on costs related to

corrosion. The initiative seeks to deter-mine the financial and societal impact of corrosion on industry sectors, including infrastructure, manufacturing, utilities, transportation, and government.

The two-year study, led by NACE and supported by industry partners worldwide, is now underway. Elaine Bowman, NACE past president, is managing the effort. The U.S. DoD Corrosion Policy and Oversight Office will provide technical support for the global study.

“Corrosion is an inevitable, but controllable process that can result in destructive, even catastrophic incidents when not properly prevented and managed,” says Bowman. “Costs associated with corro-sion control include direct expenses like repair and replacement of assets, or the

environmental and physical impact of corrosion-related failure. This study will explore direct and indirect costs of corro-sion to several industry sectors around the world and identify ways to save as much as thirty percent of those costs.”

A 2 0 0 2 s t u d y f u n d e d b y C o n g r e s s w i t h o v e r s i g h t b y t h e Federal Highway Administration and support from NACE provided broad research into direct and indirect costs for U.S. industry sectors. The 2002 report, titled “Corrosion Costs and Preventive Strategies in the United States,” includes results indicating that the annual estimated direct cost of corrosion in the United States was $276 billion. The study led Congress to develop a Corrosion Policy and Oversight Office within DoD.

The DoD Corrosion Office has demon-strated that the technology demonstration projects that it has funded and imple-

mented in partnership with the Services have offered a 40:1 return on investment, on average. The congressional study also spurred Congressional support for the launch of the world’s first undergraduate degree in corrosion at The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio.

“This study is an essential study for industry stakeholders and government worldwide,” says Bob Chalker, NACE chief executive officer. “It will be the most comprehensive study to look at costs associ-ated with the impact of corrosion and the resulting data will contribute to future project plans, regulations, education, and more.”

NACE will provide periodic updates on the progress of the new global cost of corro-sion study in NACE publications, press releases, and at www.nace.org. !

NACE International Initiates Global Study on Corrosion Costs By Alysa Reich, NACE International Sr. Manager, Public Affairs

The initiative seeks to determine the financial and societal impact of corrosion

on industry sectors.

Summer 2014 InspectThis! 7

Get This!

Charles Koenig of MCS Inspections Group, a NACE International-certified Coating Inspector, is the

winner of this issue’s drawing for a free Coating Inspector Program (CIP) course. Based in Paso Robles, California, Koenig is currently certified to CIP Level 1.

How can you enter the drawing to win a free CIP course?Simply send an e-mail message to the address [email protected] and mention that you saw this article. To be eligible, you must have completed CIP Level 1 and your certification must be active. The free CIP course (Level 2 or Level 3—Peer Review) must be taken within one year of winning the drawing.

Please note that the drawing only applies to CIP courses and not other NACE course offerings. The prize is transferrable but may not be sold. If the prize is trans-ferred, the recipient must meet the same criteria as the winner. !

Quick and easy measurement of Protective Coatings

in rough environments

Coating Thickness Material Analysis Microhardness Material Testing

www.fischer-technology.com 860-683-0781 [email protected]

Coating thickness measurement according to international standards with the robust MP0/MP0R series of pocket instruments from FISCHER.

• Used on ships, bridges, off-shore installations, cranes, heavymachinery, and others

• Special measuring modes available in accordance withSSPC-PA2 and IMO-PSPC

• Measures coatings on steel and aluminum• Wear resistant probes for precise measurement even on

rough surfaces• Pre-inspection of large areas with continuous scan mode• USB port for data communication (MP0R)• Individual report generation with intuitive FISCHER DataCenter

software

Anz_Plattform_Off-Shore_Schiff_MP0_MP0R_117,475x254_sw.indd 1 31.01.14 14:12

8 InspectThis! Summer 2014

CIP LEVEL 1

Ciudad del Carmen, Mexico July 28-August 2, 2014

Atyrau, Kazakhstan July 28-August 2, 2014

Dammam, Saudi Arabia August 2-7, 2014

Auckland, New Zealand August 4-9, 2014

Bogota, Colombia August 11-16, 2014

Durban, South Africa August 18-23, 2014

Beijing, China August 18-23, 2014

Singapore August 18-23, 2014

Imabari, Japan August 21-26, 2014

Dubai, UAE August 24-29, 2014

Shanghai, China August 24-29, 2014

Pattaya. Thailand September 1-6, 2014

Kolkatta, India September 1-6, 2014

Newington, NH September 7-12, 2014

Chennai, India September 8-13, 2014

Midrand, Johannesburg, South Africa September 8-13, 2014

Houston, TX September 8-13, 2014

Mumbai, India September 8-13, 2014

Pittsburgh, PA September 14-19, 2014

Denver, CO September 14-19, 2014

Houston, TX September 14-19, 2014

Baton Rouge, LA September 14-19, 2014

Spijkenisse, Netherlands September 15-20, 2014

Houston, TX September 21-26, 2014

Kansas City, MO September 21-26, 2014

Brasschaat, Belgium September 22-27, 2014

Buenos Aires, Argentina September 22-27, 2014

Houston, TX September 22-27, 2014

Houston, TX September 28-October 3, 2014

Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK September 29-October 4, 2014

Dubai,UAE October 5-10, 2014

Houston, TX October 5-10, 2014

Anaheim, CA October 5-10, 2014

Milan, Italy October 5-10, 2014

Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK October 6-11, 2014

Imabari, Japan October 9-14, 2014

Anaheim, CA October 12-17, 2014

Seattle, WA October 12-17, 2014

Houston, TX October 12-17, 2014

Shanghai, China October 12-17, 2014

Houston, TX October 13-18, 2014

Houston, TX October 19-24, 2014

Houston, TX October 20-25, 2014

Melbourne, Australia October 20-25, 2014

Houston, TX October 25-30, 2014

Houston, TX October 26-31, 2014

Albuquerque, NM October 26-31, 2014

Chennai, India October 27-November 1, 2014

Hong Kong, China October 27-November 1, 2014

Houston, TX October 27-November 1, 2014

Harrogate, UK October 27-November 1, 2014

CIP EXAM COURSE 1

Houston, TX October 5-7, 2014

Ulsan, Korea October 13-15, 2014

CIP LEVEL 2

Houston, TX August 3-8, 2014

Atyrau, Kazakhstan August 4-9, 2014

Dammam, Saudi Arabia August 9-14, 2014

Auckland, New Zealand August 11-16, 2014

Houston, TX August 17-22, 2014

Mobile, AL August 24-29, 2014

Beijing, China August 25-30, 2014

Dubai, UAE August 31-September 5, 2014

Shanghai, China August 31-September 5, 2014

Red Deer, AB Canada September 7-12, 2014

Pattaya. Thailand September 8-13, 2014

Houston, TX September 14-19, 2014

Chennai, India September 15-20, 2014

Mumbai, India September 15-20, 2014

Nagasaki, Japan September 17-22, 2014

Denver, CO September 21-26, 2014

Pittsburgh, PA September 21-26, 2014

Houston, TX September 28-October 3, 2014

Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK September 29-October 4, 2014

Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK October 6-11, 2014

Midrand, Johannesburg, South Africa October 6-11, 2014

Dubai, UAE October 12-17, 2014

Red Deer, AB Canada October 12-17, 2014

Houston, TX October 12-17, 2014

Antwerp, Belgium October 13-18, 2014

Shanghai, China October 19-24, 2014

Seattle, WA October 19-24, 2014

Houston, TX October 20-25, 2014

Melbourne, Australia October 27-November 1, 2014

CIP EXAM COURSE 2

Houston, TX August 6-8, 2014

Houston, TX October 8-10, 2014

Ulsan, Korea October 16-18, 2014

CIP ONE-DAY BRIDGE COURSE

Houston, TX September 13-13, 2014

CIP PEER REVIEW

Houston, TX August 22-24, 2014

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia August 24-26, 2014

Darwin, Australia September 16-18, 2014

Houston, TX September 19-21, 2014

NACE Coatings Course Schedule

Summer 2014 InspectThis! 9

Johannesburg, South Africa October 11-13, 2014

Yokosuka, Japan October 16-19, 2014

Houston, TX October 17-19, 2014

Seattle, WA October 24-26, 2014

MARINE COATING TECHNOLOGY

Houston, TX September 22-25, 2014

PCS 1 BASIC PRINCIPLES

Saint Louis, Missouri September 5-7, 2014

Houston, TX September 21-23, 2014

Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia October 27-29, 2014

PCS 2 ADVANCED

Houston, TX September 24-26, 2014

Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia October 30-November 1, 2014

PIPELINE COATING APPLICATOR TRAINING

Edmonton, AB Canada October 6-10, 2014

SHIPBOARD CORROSION ASSESSMENT TRAINING (S-CAT)

Houston, TX August 11-15, 2014

NACE Coatings Course Schedule

Joint NACE/ASTM Standard

NACE Members: Download this standard for free at www.nace.org/nacestore!

NACE/ASTM G193-12d, “Standard Terminology and Acronyms Relating to Corrosion,” presents common corrosion terms, defined by industry experts from NACE International and ASTM.

The joint standard includes:

• Over 400 corrosion terms and definitions

• 200 defined acronyms

• Consistent definitions for related terms used in NACE and ASTM standards

List: $37NACE Member: $28 (for a printed copy of the standard)

Item # 21137

For a complete list of NACE courses including course descriptions and the

latest course schedule, go to www.nace.org/Training-Education.

10 InspectThis! Summer 2014

Coatings Resources

NACE International Technical Committees Need You!• Help influence industry standards. • Exchange technical information. • Strengthen your leadership skills.

As a NACE International member, you can sign up online to join a committee—go to the NACE Committees section at www.nace.org to join an STG or TEG. Contact the chair of a TG to indicate interest in that type of committee.

Types of Committees• Specific Technology Groups (STGs) • Task Groups (TGs) • Technology Exchange Groups (TEGs)TECHNICAL COMMITTEES

Committee Description Scope/Assignment

STG 02 Coatings and Linings, Protective: Atmospheric Scope: Determine uses, application, and performance of coatings for atmospheric service. Atmospheric service denotes industrial and commer-cial equipment, architectural structures, and bridges.

TG 030 Coating Conductance

TG 146 Coatings, Thermal-Spray Assignment: Review and revise joint standard NACE No. 12/AWS C2.23M/SSPC-CS 23.00, “Specification for the Application of Thermal Spray Coatings (Metalizing) of Aluminum, Zinc, and their Alloys and Composites for the Corrosion Protection of Steel.”

TG 148 Threaded Fasteners: Coatings for Protection of Threaded Fasteners Used with Structural Steel, Piping, and Equipment

Assignment: Revise NACE Publication 02107, “Coatings for Protection of Threaded Fasteners Used with Structural Steel, Piping, and Equipment.”

TEG 192X Coating Industry Problems Confronting Owners and Contractors

Assignment: To provide a format for handling problems and issues that affect the owner and contractor utilizing coatings. Problems and issues may include hazardous waste, volatile organic compounds, applicator training, federal and state regulations, and others that may develop.

TG 251 Review and Revise or Reaffirm SP0109-2009

TEG 255X Coatings, Thermal-Spray for Corrosion Protection Assignment: Exchange of information regarding thermal-spray coatings (TSCs) used for corrosion protection.

TG 260 Review of NACE Standard TM0304-2004 Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE Standard TM0304.

TEG 311X Threaded Fasteners: Coatings and Methods of Protection for Threaded Fasteners Used with Structural Steel, Piping, and Equipment

Assignment: Share information concerning, and discuss effective methods for, corrosion control of fasteners used with structural, piping, and equip-ment connections.

TG 312 Offshore Platform Coatings for Atmospheric and Splash Zone New Construction

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE Standard TM0404.

TG 340 Offshore Coating Condition Assessment for Maintenance Planning

Assignment: Develop a standard practice addressing a standard method and grading system to assess the in-service condition of offshore coatings. Provide direction regarding the use of assessment data in managing maintenance painting programs. The documented process will serve as an aid in the planning, budget, and execution of offshore maintenance programs.

TEG 346X Offshore Coatings: Laboratory Testing Criteria Assignment: Review and critique laboratory testing methods designed to predict performance in an offshore environment. Assess test variables and gather data needed to improve industry standard techniques.

TEG 399X Evaluation, Testing, and Specifying Coating Materials for Elevated Temperatures for Insulated and Uninsulated Service

Assignment: Exchange information, create a task group for state-of-the-art report, followed by formation of a task group to write a standard practice, and sponsor symposium.

TG 415 Review and Revise as Necessary NACE Standard RP0281-2004

Assignment: Review and revise if necessary NACE Standard RP0281-2004, “Method for Conducting Coating (Paint) Panel Evaluation Testing in Atmospheric Exposures.”

TG 422 Coatings for Elevated-Temperature Insulated or Noninsulated Exterior Service

Assignment: To write a state-of-the-art report.

TEG 424X Liquid-Applied Insulative Coatings for Atmospheric Service at 0 to 375 °F

Assignment: To discuss issues of spray-applied insulative coatings for elevated-temperature exterior surfaces.

TEG 428X Hot-Dip Galvanizing for Steel Corrosion Protection Assignment: To discuss and furnish technical information on the process of hot-dip galvanizing and its use as a corrosion protection system for steel fabrications as well as the inspection of hot-dip galvanized coatings with other corrosion protection systems.

TG 477 Test Methods for Determining True Insulation Value of Liquid Insulative Materials Applied on Steel Surfaces from 80 °F to 275 °F

Assignment: To write a standard to determine thermal conductivity of liquid applied insulative materials.

Summer 2014 InspectThis! 11

Coatings Resources

STG 03 Coatings and Linings, Protective: Immersion and Buried Service

Scope: Determine effectiveness, performance criteria, and quality needs of immersion coatings and lining materials used in immersion service.

TG 009 Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic Linings for Aboveground Storage Tank Floors

Assignment: To develop a standard practice for installing fiberglass-reinforced plastic linings within aboveground storage tanks.

TG 031 Pipeline Coating, Plant-Applied Fusion-Bonded Epoxy: Review of NACE Standard RP0394

Assignment: To update and revise NACE Standard RP0394-2002, “Application, Performance, and Quality Control of Plant-Applied, Fusion-Bonded Epoxy External Pipe Coating.”

TG 034 Pipeline Coatings, External: Gouge Test Assignment: To write a test method and criteria for evaluation of gouge resis-tance of a particular coating.

TG 037 Pipelines, Oilfield: Thermoplastic Liners Assignment: To review and revise NACE Standard RP0304-2004 as neces-sary.

TG 141 Coatings and Linings over Concrete for Chemical Immersion and Containment Service

Assignment: To update SP0892-2007 to incorporate current technologies and practices to successfully protect concrete.

TG 246 Thin-Film Organic Linings Applied to Process Vessels and Tankages

Assignment: Develop application technology for applying thin-film linings to prevent corrosion, hydrogen-induced cracking, or other corrosion deteriora-tion by internal corrosion mechanisms.

TG 247 Reaffirm NACE Standard RP0105-2005 Assignment: To reaffirm NACE Standard RP0105-2005, “External Repair, Rehabilitation, and Weld Joints on Pipelines.”

TG 248 Coatings, Heat-Shrink Sleeves for External Repair, Rehabilitations, and Weld Joints on Pipelines

Assignment: To review and revise as needed NACE Standard RP0303-2003, “Field-Applied Heat-Shrinkable Sleeves for Pipelines: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”

TG 249 Review and Revise as Necessary NACE Standard RP0402-2002

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary NACE Standard RP0402-2002, “Field-Applied Fusion-Bonded Epoxy (FBE) Pipe Coating Systems for Girth Weld Joints: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”

TG 250 Coal-Tar Enamel Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitations, and Weld Joints on Pipelines

Assignment: Review and revise/reaffirm as necessary NACE Standard RP0602-2002, “Field-Applied External Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”

TG 263 Review of NACE Standard TM0104-2004 Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE Standard TM0104-2004.

TG 264 Offshore Exterior Submerged Coatings: Standard Test Methods

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE Standard TM0204-2004.

TG 266 Coating and Lining Materials in Immersion Service: Review of NACE Standard TM0174

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary NACE Standard TM0174-2002, “Laboratory Methods for the Evaluation of Protective Coatings and Lining Materials in Immersion Service.”

TG 281 Coatings, Polyurethane for Field Repair, Rehabilitation, and Girth Weld Joints on Pipelines

Assignment: To develop a standard practice for a minimal specification for the field application, repair, and testing for a polyurethane coating to be used on the exterior of buried pipelines.

TG 296 Coating Systems, Wax, for Underground Piping Systems: Review of NACE Standard RP0375

Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE Standard RP0375, “Wax Coating Systems for Underground Piping Systems.”

TG 298 Review and Revise as Necessary NACE Standard RP0399-2004

Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE Standard RP0399-2004, “Plant-Applied External Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”

TG 336 External Pipeline Coatings: Practices, Test Methods, and/or Test Methodologies for High-Operating-Temperature Pipelines, Immersion and Buried Service Only

Assignment: Develop a technical committee report that outlines state-of-the-art practices as described in the title.

TG 337 External Pipeline Coatings: Field Installation and Inspection Criteria for Maximum Performance

Assignment: Develop a standard practice that identifies common aspects of field installation pertaining to quality installation and long-term perfor-mance.

TEG 351X Coatings Under Insulation Material Testing Procedure Recommendations: Discussion

Assignment: Discussion of the development of a recommended test procedure for qualification of coatings used under insulation service.

TG 352 Coating Systems (External) for Pipeline Directional Drill Applications

Assignment: To develop a standard practice for minimum specifications for external coatings for use in directional drill service.

TG 353 External Pipeline Coatings: Multi-Layer Polyolefin Coating Systems

Assignment: Develop a standard to describe requirements for multi-layer polyolefin coating systems for pipelines.

TEG 354X Pipeline Coatings: Underground Blistering Assignment: Discuss blistering of underground pipeline coatings, causes of blistering, and prevention methods.

TG 425 State of the Art in CUI Coating Systems Assignment: Describe available systems, performance, and industry-accepted criteria for coatings under insulation.

Committee Description Scope/Assignment

12 InspectThis! Summer 2014

Coatings Resources

TEG 435X Effects of Bioethanols on Fused Silica Containment Vessels in Immersion and Phase Change Exposures

Assignment: To hold technical information exchanges (TIEs) on the effects of bioethanols, aromatic ethanols, and sulfurous emissions on fused silica containment vessels.

TG 470 Cathodic Disbondment Test for Coated Steel Structures Under Cathodic Protection

Assignment: To develop a standard test method to conduct the cathodic disbondment test.

TG 479 NACE Adoption of ISO 21809-3 Assignment: Review ISO 21809 with the goal to adopt or adopt with changes (amendments) to the standard and create a NACE/ISO, possibly modified, standard.

TG 490 Review and Adoption of API 5L2, “Recommended Practice for Internal Coating of Line Pipe for Non-Corrosive Gas Transportation Service”

Assignment: To review and modify (if and where necessary) API 5L2, “Recommended Practice for Internal Coating of Line Pipe for Non-Corrosive Gas Transmission Service,” with input from NACE user community. The standard will have a dual NACE/API number.

TG 507 Review and Revise as Necessary SP0188-2006 Assignment: To review and revise as necessary SP0188-2006, “Discontinuity (Holiday) Testing of New Protective Coatings on Conductive Substrates.”

TG 508 Review and Revise as Necessary SP0490-2007 Assignment: To review and revise as necessary SP0490, “Holiday Detection of Fusion-Bonded Epoxy External Pipeline Coatings of 250 to 760 µm (10 to 30 mils)

STG 04 Coatings and Linings, Protective: Surface Preparation Scope: Determine effectiveness, performance criteria, and quality needs of various methods of surface preparation for the application of coatings and linings.

TG 006 Blasting: Review of Joint Standards NACE 1-4/SSPC-SP 5, 10, 6, and 7, and NACE No. 8/SSPC-SP 14

Assignment: To review, revise, or reaffirm as necessary joint blasting standards NACE No. 1-4/SSPC-SP 5, 10, 6, 7: “White Metal Blast Cleaning,” “Near-White Metal Blast Cleaning,” “Commercial Blast Cleaning,” and “Brush-Off Blast Cleaning,” and NACE No. 8/SSPC-SP 14, “Industrial Blast Cleaning.”

TG 320 Review and Revise as Necessary NACE No. 13SSPC-ACS-1

TG 323 Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning Assignment: To review and update joint technical committee report NACE 6G198/SSPC-TR 2, “Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning.”

TG 350 Surface Preparation by Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning Assignment: Develop a standard for wet abrasive blast cleaning of steel surfaces that will complement the existing NACE/SSPC joint standards for dry abrasive blast cleaning.

TG 417 Review and Revise as Necessary Joint Surface Preparation Standard NACE No. 6/SSPC-SP 13

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary joint standard NACE No. 6/SSPC-SP 13, “Surface Preparation of Concrete,” to reflect current industry practices and to reflect proper reference to other industry publications.

TG 419 Review and Revise as Necessary NACE Standard RP0287-2002

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary RP0287-2002, “Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Abrasive Blast-Cleaned Steel Surfaces Using a Replica Tape,” and to include other methods of profile measurement now being widely used throughout the industry.

TEG 423X Nonvisible, Nonwater-Soluble Contaminants Affecting Corrosion Protection

Assignment: Discuss the effects of coating performance when applied over nonvisible, nonwater-soluble contaminants and their effects on coating performance.

TG 443 Field Testing for Soluble Salts: Commonly Used Methods

Assignment: Develop a technical committee report detailing commonly used soluble salts field test methods.

TEG 469X Surface Preparation Issues Assignment: To provide a forum to discuss various issues affecting surface preparation.

TG 518 Soluble Salt Testing Frequency and Locations on Previously Coated Surfaces

STG 43 Transportation, Land Scope: To promote the development of techniques to extend the life of land transportation equipment.

TG 061 Revision of NACE SP0592 (formerly RP0592), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Railway Tank Cars in Concentrated (90-98%) Sulfuric Acid Service”

Assignment: To update and revise NACE SP0592 (formerly RP0592), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Railway Tank Cars in Concentrated (90-98%) Sulfuric Acid Service.”

TG 063 Railcars: Corrosion Protection and Control Program Assignment: Develop guidelines for railcar lining requalification.

TEG 064X Railcar Surface Preparation Assignment: To keep abreast of industry changes and techniques and report findings annually.

Committee Description Scope/Assignment

Summer 2014 InspectThis! 13

Coatings Resources

TG 067 Review and Revise or Reaffirm NACE SP0302-2007 Assignment: To review and revise or reaffirm NACE SP0302-2007, “Selection and Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars in Molten Sulfur Service.”

TG 271 Removal Procedures for Nonvisible Contaminants on Railcar Surfaces

Assignment: To prepare a technical committee report describing surface decontamination for railcars prior to coating application.

TEG 291X Land Transportation: Information Exchange on Corrosion and Coating-Related Issues

Assignment: Technical information exchange in conjunction with an STG meeting.

TG 332 Review and Revise or Reaffirm as Necessary NACE SP0386-2007

Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE SP0386-2007 (formerly RP0386), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of Covered Steel Hopper Railcars in Plastic, Food, and Chemical Service.”

TG 333 Review and Revise or Reaffirm as Necessary NACE SP0295-2008

Assignment: To review and revise or reaffirm NACE SP0295-2008 (formerly RP0295), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars.”

TG 339 Railcars: Coating Application on Exterior Surfaces of Steel Railcars

Assignment: Review and revise as appropriate NACE Standard RP0692-2003, “Application of a Coating System to Exterior Surfaces of Steel Rail Cars.”

TG 366 Railcars: Corrosion Under Tank Car Insulation Assignment: Review and revise as appropriate NACE Publication 14C296 to ensure information is still relevant.

TG 378 Waterborne Coatings on Railcars Assignment: To prepare a state-of-the-art report on waterborne coatings on railcars.

TG 379 Surface Preparation by Encapsulated Blast Media for Repair of Existing Coatings on Railcars

Assignment: To prepare a state-of-the-art report on surface preparation by encapsulated blast media for repair of existing coatings on railcars.

TG 394 Guidelines for Qualifying Personnel as Abrasive Blasters and Coating and Lining Applicators in the Rail Industry

Assignment: To review and revise NACE Standard RP0495-2003.

TG 406 Review of NACE SP0398-2006 Assignment: Review and revise as necessary NACE SP0398-2006 (formerly RP0398), “Recommendations for Training and Qualifying Personnel as Railcar Coating and Lining Inspectors.”

TG 437 Maintenance Overcoating of Railcar Exteriors Assignment: To prepare a state-of-the-art report for the application of maintenance overcoating of railcar exteriors.

TG 444 Guidelines for Data Collection and Analysis of Railroad Tank Car Interior Coating/Lining Condition

Assignment: To produce a standard that provides guidelines for inspect-ing, rating, and documenting the condition of interior coatings and linings in railroad tank cars to comply with H-201.

TG 451 Corrosion-Resistant Non-Skid Surfaces for Railcar Exteriors

Assignment: Produce a standard that defines and addresses the essential properties and specifications for corrosion-resistant non-skid surfaces on railcar exteriors.

TG 456 Coating Thickness Measurement, Methods, and Recording—Specific to the Railcar Industry

Assignment: Prepare a state-of-the-art report outlining currently used procedures for dry film thickness measurement and recording for coatings on railcars.

STG 44 Marine Corrosion: Ships and Structures Scope: To study the corrosion mechanisms, causes, effects, and corrosion control remedies for ships, structures, and equipment exposed to marine environments and to disseminate information in the form of industry standards and formal and informal technical information exchanges on the research, development, and performance of materials, coatings, and improved or innovative methods to mitigate problems related to marine corrosion.

TEG 181X Marine Vessel Corrosion Assignment: To study the causes, effects, and remedies of corrosion in various marine vessels.

TG 452 Testing of Coating Suitability, Anode Consumption, and Corrosion Evaluation with Use of BWT Systems

Assignment: To write a standard on evaluation of risk for damage to coatings, increased anode consumption, and corrosion in conjunction with the use of ballast water treatment (BWT) systems.

TG 461 Standard for Hull Roughness Measurements on Ship Hulls in Dry Dock

Assignment: To develop a standard on how to perform both in-docking hull roughness readings (before blasting and cleaning in dry dock) and before out-docking hull roughness readings.

TG 475 Standard for Underwater Evaluation of Degrees of Fouling

Assignment: To develop a pictorial standard to be used to evaluate the (1) extent, (2) location, and (3) type of fouling to ship hulls and propellers.

TG 476 Corrosion Protection of Offshore Wind Power Units Assignment: To write a standard practice that defines a life cycle of corrosion protection for offshore wind power structures.

Committee Description Scope/Assignment

14 InspectThis! Summer 2014

Coatings ResourcesSTANDARDS & REPORTSAtmospheric ServiceStandards Item NumberSP0108-2008 Corrosion Control of Offshore Structures by Protective Coatings 21126RP0281-2004 Method for Conducting Coating (Paint) Panel Evaluation Testing in Atmospheric Exposures 21026SP0297-2012 (formerly RP0297) Maintenance Painting of Electrical Substation Apparatus Including Flow Coating of

Transformer Radiators21081

NACE No. 12/AWS C2.23M/SSPC-CS 23.00

Specification for the Application of Thermal Spray Coatings (Metallizing) of Aluminum, Zinc, and Their Alloys and Composites for the Corrosion Protection of Steel (RP0203-2003)

21100

TM0304-2004 Offshore Platform Atmospheric and Splash Zone Maintenance Coating System Evaluation

21245

TM0404-2004 Offshore Platform Atmospheric and Splash Zone New Construction Coating System Evaluation 21246

Reports Item NumberNACE Publication 80200/SSPC-TR 4 Preparation of Protective Coating Specifications for Atmospheric Service 24209NACE Publication 02103 Liquid-Applied Coatings for High-Temperature Atmospheric Service 24219NACE Publication 02203/ICRI Technical Guideline 03741/SSPC-TR 5

Design, Installation, and Maintenance of Protective Polymer Flooring Systems for Concrete 24220

Immersion/Buried ServiceStandards Item NumberSP0274-2011 (formerly RP0274) High-Voltage Electrical Inspection of Pipeline Coatings Prior to Installation 21010RP0375-2006 Field-Applied Underground Wax Coating Systems for Underground Pipelines:

Application, Performance, and Quality Control21013

SP0185-2007 (formerly RP0185) Extruded Polyolefin Resin Coating Systems with Soft Adhesives for Underground or Submerged Pipe

21029

SP0111-2011 Coating Technical File in Accordance with the IMO Performance Standard for Protective Coatings

21153

SP0188-2006 (formerly RP0188) Discontinuity (Holiday) Testing of New Protective Coatings on Conductive Substrates 21038SP0288-2011 (formerly RP0288) Inspection of Linings on Steel and Concrete 21039SP0490-2007 (formerly RP0490) Holiday Detection of Fusion-Bonded Epoxy External Pipeline Coatings of 250 to 760

µm (10 to 30 mils)21045

SP0892-2007 (formerly RP0892) Coatings and Linings over Concrete for Chemical Immersion and Containment Service 21060RP0394-2002 Application, Performance, and Quality Control of Plant-Applied, Fusion-Bonded Epoxy

External Pipe Coating21064

SP0298-2007 (formerly RP0298) Sheet Rubber Linings for Abrasion and Corrosion Service 21085RP0399-2004 Plant-Applied, External Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application,

Performance, and Quality Control21089

NACE No. 10/SSPC-PA 6 Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Linings Applied to Bottoms of Carbon Steel Aboveground Storage Tanks (RP0202-2002)

21093

RP0402-2002 Field-Applied Fusion-Bonded Epoxy (FBE) Pipe Coating Systems for Girth Weld Joints: Application, Performance, and Quality Control

21096

RP0105-2005 Liquid-Epoxy Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitation, and Weld Joints on Buried Steel Pipelines

21106

SP0181-2006 (formerly RP0181) Liquid-Applied Internal Protective Coatings for Oilfield Production Equipment 21025RP0602-2002 Field-Applied Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application, Performance, and

Quality Control21098

NACE No. 11/SSPC-PA 8 Thin-Film Organic Linings Applied in New Carbon Steel Process Vessels (RP0103-2003) 21099RP0303-2003 Field-Applied Heat-Shrinkable Sleeves for Pipelines: Application, Performance, and

Quality Control21101

RP0304-2004 Design, Installation, and Operation of Thermoplastic Liners for Oilfield Pipelines 21103TM0174-2002 Laboratory Methods for the Evaluation of Protective Coatings and Lining Materials on

Metallic Substrates in Immersion Service21206

TM0102-2002 Measurement of Protective Coating Electrical Conductance on Underground Pipelines 21241TM0104-2004 Offshore Platform Ballast Water Tank Coating System Evaluation 21243TM0204-2004 Exterior Protective Coatings for Seawater Immersion Service 21244SP0109-2009 Field Application of Bonded Tape Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitation, and Weld

Joints on Buried Metal Pipelines21143

TM0109-2009 Aboveground Survey Techniques for the Evaluation of Underground Pipeline Coating Condition

21254

Summer 2014 InspectThis! 15

Coatings ResourcesSurface Preparation

Standards Item Number

SP0178-2007 (formerly RP0178) Design, Fabrication, and Surface Finish Practices for Tanks and Vessels to be Lined for Immersion Service

21022

RP0287-2002 Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Abrasive Blast Cleaned Steel Surfaces Using a Replica Tape

21035

TM0105-2012 Test Procedures for Organic-Based Conductive Coating Anodes for Use on Concrete Structures 21247

NACE No. 1/SSPC-SP 5 White Metal Blast Cleaning (SP0494-2007) 21065

NACE No. 2/SSPC-SP 10 Near-White Metal Blast Cleaning (SP0594-2007) 21066

NACE No. 3/SSPC-SP 6 Commercial Blast Cleaning (SP0694-2007) 21067

NACE No. 4/SSPC-SP 7 Brush-Off Blast Cleaning (SP0794-2007) 21068

WJ-1: SP0212-2012 Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Clean to Bare Substrate (WJ-1)

21158

WJ-2: SP0312-2012 Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Very Thorough Cleaning (WJ-2)

21155

WJ-3: SP0412-2012 Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Thorough Cleaning (WJ-3)

21156

WJ-4: SP0512-2012 Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Light Cleaning (WJ-4) 21157

NACE No. 6/SSPC-SP 13 Surface Preparation of Concrete (RP0397-2003) 21082

NACE No. 8/SSPC-SP 14 Industrial Blast Cleaning (SP0299-2007) 21088

NACE No. 13/SSPC-ACS-1 Industrial Coating and Lining Application Specialist Qualification and Certification 21122

SP0508-2010 Methods of Validating Equivalence to ISO 8502-9 on Measurement of the Levels of Soluble Salts

21134

SP0213-2013 Definition of Set Soluble Salt Levels by Conductivity Measurements 21172

Reports Item Number

NACE Publication 6A192/SSPC-TR 3 Dehumidification and Temperature Control During Surface Preparation, Application, and Curing for Coatings/Linings of Steel Tanks, Vessels, and Other Enclosed Spaces

24083

NACE Publication 6G194/SSPC-TR 1 Thermal Precleaning 24183

NACE Publication 6G197/SSPC-TU 2

Design, Installation, and Maintenance of Coating Systems for Concrete Used in Secondary Containment

24193

NACE Publication 6G198/SSPC-TR 2 Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning 24199

Land Transportation

Standards Item Number

SP0386-2007 (formerly RP0386) Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of Covered Steel Hopper Rail Cars in Plastic, Food, and Chemical Service

21033

SP0592-2006 (formerly RP0592) Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars in Concentrated (90 to 98%) Sulfuric Acid Service

21057

RP0692-2003 Application of a Coating System to Exterior Surfaces of Steel Rail Cars 21058

SP0295-2008 (formerly RP0295) Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars 21070

RP0495-2003 Guidelines for Qualifying Personnel as Abrasive Blasters and Coating and Lining Applicators in the Rail Industries

21072

SP0398-2006 (formerly RP0398) Recommendations for Training and Qualifying Personnel as Railcar Coating and Lining Inspectors

21086

SP0302-2007 (formerly RP0302) Selection and Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars in Molten Sulfur Service

21095

Reports Item Number

NACE Publication 14C296 Protective Coatings for Mitigating Corrosion Under Insulation on Rail Tank Cars 24191

NACE Publication 6G198/SSPC-TR 2 Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning 24199

16 InspectThis! Summer 2014Introducing the 3-Year Warranty on the Model 10/20 Holiday Detector!Introducing the 3-Year Warranty on the Model 10/20 Holiday Detector!Introducing the 3-Year Warranty on the Model 10/20 Holiday Detector!