Mining Regulatory Framework: Problems and Issues in Indonesia - with Halmahera Case
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of Mining Regulatory Framework: Problems and Issues in Indonesia - with Halmahera Case
Mining Regulatory Framework: Problems and Issues in Indonesia
- with Halmahera Case -
By Joseph Viandrito
March 2013
Questions
1. Regulatory framework: Do the new Mining Law and its subordinate regulations meet your expectations? Which best or worst practices have you seen emerge under the new legal framework so far?
2. Contracts of Works : There is intense pressure from various groups to renegotiate/ terminate Contracts of Works due to various reasons. What is your opinion and position about this?
3. Mining issues: What are the most urgent issues related to mining practices (waste management, land acquisition, forest area used permit, community health, labor, indigenous rights, biodiversity, illegal mining, mining license/ contract, or others )?
The Mining Law No. 9/2009
Good Newsfor mining industry
Bad Newsfor mining industry
More Central Government control over Regional Government
Move from Contract based system to license system
20% (versus 51%) foreign divestment may still be manageable, and enable mining companies to divest in stock market
Too many new subordinate regulations: a strict Divestment Policy, Export Tax Increase, no more raw materials export and complicated procedures for export
Government drives for transparency, avoiding transfer pricing and concession trading
Intrusive controls over mining operations and use of local mining contractors
Starting point for dialogue among stakeholders and a legal cornerstone for Indonesia’s mining industry
Smaller size concession mines affect economies of scale
National government welcomes and supports foreign investment and commitment for MP3EI
Possible discrimination treatment
Opportunity in smelter industry Overly Nationalistic Tone
Clear mapping of mining area, prevent regional governments from easily issuing mining permit
Constant pressure from resource nationalist and regional autonomy figures to change the Mining Law
Overview of major regulatory frameworks on mining...there appears to be a power struggle: Nationalist vs. Localist, Protectionist vs. Liberalist...
Resource
Nationalism
Pressure &
„Hattanomics‟
took a lead
National
Government
Fights
National
Government
Fights Back
Introduce
the CoW
framework
Power struggle:
National vs.
Local govt. &
Nationalist vs.
Liberalist
Regional
Autonomy
Law No. 22
& 25 of
1999, and
No. 32 of
2004
Law No.
9/2009 on
Coal and
Mineral
Mining (the
Mining Law).
Illegal Mining
and Bad
Mining
Practices,
Rush to
Export Raw
Material
Ministerial
Regulation
No. 7/2012
on the
increase in
Value Added/
Smelter
Huge
Mining
Investment
Drives
Competition
ANI and
APKASI
Won a
judicial
Review
from MA
towards
PP 7/2012
ESDM
Minister
Regulation
No. 11/
2012 and
No. 24/2012
?
Small miners
are dying
Disputes
on Mining
Permits,
Extensive
Illegal
Mining,
Illegal
Logging,
Corruption s
Finance Minister
Regulation
75/2012
20% tariff on
exports of 65
types of
minerals
PP No
24/2012:
Divestment
Policy 51%
PP No 23/2010:
Divestment
Policy 20%Pro Market
Supporters:
“Back to the Law
No. 11/1967”
Localist &
Pro Market
Fight
Trade Ministry
Regulation No
29/2012: 20%
Export Tax
Mining Law 1967
CoW status
changes, smelter,
divestment, more
revenue & bigger
role of national
government over
local govt.
Presidential Decree No. 3
of 2012 – Establishment
of “Contract of Work
Renegotiation” Team)
Big Miners
complaints,
even some
refused the
smelter policy
Contract of Work
Renegotiation
What makes it different now?
CoWs and CCoWs will be extended as IUPs, not by an extension of the CoW or CCoW itself.
• IUP issued by the Minister, not Regional Government
• Minister must consider the reserves within the work area and the maximum benefit in the interests of the State when granting an IUP
• Minister can reject applications for extension if the holder of the CoW or CCoW has not shown good performance in mining exploitation
• Any land area of a CoW or CCoW that is not included in the IUP will become a State Reserve – contemplates that it will be necessary to reduce size of CoWs and CCoWs to maximum size permitted for IUPs
working contract area
timetable for operation-production
processing obligation (nickel purification)
participation of local/national mining
service companies
divestment obligation
state revenue
The Key ActorsThe team is led by Coordinating Minister for the Economy Hatta Radjasa. Its members consist of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Jero Wacik,who is also currently the chairman of the board. There is also Finance Minister Agus Martowardoyo, Interior Minister Gamawan Fauzi, Justice Minister Amir Syamsudin, Industry Minister MS Hidayat, Trade Minister Gita Wirjawan, Forestry Minister Zulkifli Hasan, Minister of SOEs Dahlan Iskan, Cabinet Secretary Dipo Alam, Attorney General Basrief Arief, BPKP Mardiasmo Head and Head of BKPM Chatib Basri. Meanwhile, Director General of Mineral and Coal Thamrin Sihite act as the secretary.
Regulatory Framework & TimeframeThe establishment of this team is based on Presidential Decree No. 3 of 2012 which was signed last January 10, 2012. The team is tasked with evaluating the work agreement contract work and mining business. The team provides report to the president every six months or whenever necessary. The team will work until December 2013.
The Power of Regional Autonomy
- and the risk for WBN -
The regional authorities of the provinces, regencies and municipalities shall
administer and manage their own affairs according to the principles of regional autonomy and the duty of assistance
(1945 CONSTITUTION Article 18 (2)
Many mining companies operate inside or close to WBN mining areas. They already have IPPKH (Permits for Forest Borrow & Use for mining exploration activity - Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan Untuk KegiatanEksplorasi Tambang) from the Ministry of Forestry:
1. PT Adita Nickel Indonesia (#1)2. PT Adidaya Tangguh (#2 – Blok 6, dan #3 – Blok A1) 3. PT Bintara Hardasurya #4 – Blok D1, dan #6 – Blok D4)4. PT Gane Tambang Sentosa (#7)5. PT Indotama Mineral Indonesia (#11 – Blok H 3)6. PT Nusa Halmahera Minerals (#12)7. PT Zouk (#15 – Blok G2)(Source: Forestry Ministry)
• Will they create possible threats to WBN (permits, concession, etc.)?• How are their ties with the local government? • Who owns those companies?
The provincial government has the right to cancel the license if the mining
activities destroy the environment (Law No. 32 of 2009 on the Protection and
Management of the Environment).
State-Owned Enterprise and Foreign Enterprises usually lose in court against local governments: 1). PT Tambang Batu Bara Bukit Asam Tbk. lost against 16 new mining licenses in Lahat South Sumatera. 2) PT Aneka Tambang Tbk. (Antam) lost against one local company in Konawe Utara. 3) Rio Tinto Indonesia lost against 14 new mining licenses in Morowali, Sulawesi Tengah. 4). PT Inco Tbk lost against PT Hotman Internasional in Morowali
5). Churchill Inc. lost against PT Nusantara (owned by Prabowo) in East Kutai.
Overlapping of Government RegulationsPossible impact
to WBN
A consortium of NGO filed a lawsuit against Law 41/1999 that allow 13 companies (including WBN) to have open-pit mining in protected forest area.
Key Actors to target
NGO Hardliners and Parliament members – Commission V continue to pressure for the revision of Law No. 19/2004 back to Forestry Law No. 41/1999, since the law gives too much leniency to miners, while the previous law strictly forbids open-pit mining in the protected forest. The law creates many disasters, such as landslides and flooding due to excessive logging.
NGO: ELSAM, Walhi, Jatam. They once filed a lawsuit against this law, but failed.Parliament: -Com.V :BahrumDaido (F-PD)
CoW remains valid for their stating period but must ‘adjust’ to the new Mining Law. This ‘adjustment’ has not been resolved yet, as well as with WBN. However, the government aims to conclude in 2013.
A team has been formed by Presidential Decre, led by Hatta Rajasa
An NGO consortium TAPHL, whichconsist of 92 NGO activists
IUPs may be issued for different minerals to different parties in the same concession area, or may also overlap with plantation companies or with government rights to construct transmission lines. This ‘coexist’ situation can be faced by WBN, since concession for 7 other companies can also exist in WBN concession area.
Local govt., BPN, Thamrin Sihite (now manage IUP reconciliation, Minister of Forestry, PLN)
Law
No.19/2004
Forestry
Pressure continues to revise the current Forestry Law No.
19/2004 to be back to the Forestry Law No. 41/1999. The Law
no. 19/2004 has provided legal certainty for the continuation
of mining activities, which in turn provides employment
opportunities, and ensure the regional economic growth.
Landscape of Issues
Issues at the National Level
Contract of Work Renegotiation
IssueRegional
Autonomy Power Issue
Overlapping Government Regulations
The Mining Law No. 4/2009
Divestment Policy
(Regulation No. 24/2012)
Mining Permits and Disputes
Smelter policy & Ban on Raw
Material Export(Regulation No.
7/2012)
Biodiversity Conservation
and NRMControversy on WBN’s Forest-
use Permit
Indigenous Rights and Local
Community Issues
Hatta-nomicsand Resource Nationalism
Labor issues
Land acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement
Waste issues and environment
management
Export Tax and Royalty Policy
Community Health, Safety, Security and
Welfare
Mining Area & Time period
Mapping of issues and stakeholdersNo. Issues PRO CONS
1. Contract of Work Renegotiation
National Government (President, Minister of ESDM, Trade, Industry), Parliament (DPR/DPD), Local Government, NGOs, Associations
CoW Holders
2. Open-pit Mining in Protected Forest Area
Megawati & President SBY, Ministry of ESDM, Trade, Industry
Local Governments in Kalimantan, TAPHL (NGO Consortium), WALHI, JATAM, KIARA, KAU.
3. Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement
Association of 17 head of villages from Central Halmahera
WALHI, JATAM, KIARA, WALHI MALUKU UTARA, LBH PRO YUSTISIA.
4. Indigenous Rights and Local Community Issues
None Marzuki Alie (DPR), AMAN, Forest Watch, JKPP, Greenpeace, Komnas HAM, Achmad Santosa (UKP4), BirdLife. and Supporters Alliance for Pagu (Halmahera) Indigenous People.
5. Biodiversity Conservation (of WBN)
None WALHI, JATAM, WWF, CI, TNC, BirdLife, DirGenof Forest Conservation – Forestry Ministry, University of Pattimura, NGO Hualopu, KAU,Walhi Maluku Utara (13 local NGOs)
6. Community Health, Safety and Security
None PB HMI, WALHI, JATAM, KAU, KIARA, FORMADA.BirdLife, Walhi Maluku Utara (13 local NGOs)
7. Labor Issues Parliament (Commission VII, HIPPI,National Government
Manpower and Transmigration Department -East Halmahera District.
8. Waste & Environmental Management
None NGOs (JATAM, WALHI and Kiara), Parliament (Satya - Commission VII).
- Mapping from: interviews & desk review -
Divestment Policy
PRO: National/ local govt., Indonesia businessmen, NGO, media, Marwan (expert)
AGAINST: Multi-National Corporations, CoW Holders
Export Tax Regulation
PRO: National Government, Expert (Marwan), DPR (Satya), NGOs.
AGAINST: Local Government, National/ Local Companies and Importers of Indonesia’s Minerals
(For Nickel, biggest importers : China, Japan,Europe).
Regulation No. 7/2012 on the increase in Value Added/ Smelter
PRO: NATIONAL GOVERNMENT, Marwan (Expert), DPR (Satya), DPD (Stefi)
AGAINST: BUSINESS/ASSOCIATION – (ANI, IMA), KNPI, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Controversy of The Mining Law No. 9/2009
NEED REVISION FOR BIGGER ROLE OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT: National Government (ESDM),
Parliament, Business Assosiation
NEED REVISION FOR NATIONALISM IDEA: GMKN, Muhammadiyah, Nahdlatul Ulama, Expert
Stakeholders’ standpoint
Mining in the years aheadHuge investment, but unprepared
companies towards smelter era and small miners are dying
Halmahera in the years
ahead
Mining and Plantation areas over Indigenous
People Areas
Tribes of Halmahera Island