LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT

PREPARED FOR: VENTNOR CITY SCHOOL

DISTRICT 400 N. LAFAYETTE AVENUE VENTNOR CITY, NJ 08406 ATTN: TERRI NOWOTNY

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

PREPARED BY: CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

520 S. BURNT MILL ROAD

VOORHEES, NJ 08043 TELEPHONE: (856) 427-0200

FACSIMILE: (856) 427-6529 WWW.CONCORD-ENGINEERING.COM

CEG CONTACT: KEVIN BLANKENBUEHLER

DIRECTOR, ENERGY SERVICES EMAIL: [email protected]

REPORT ISSUANCE: FINAL, SEPTEMBER 8, 2015

PROJECT NO: 1C15142

Ventnor City School District – Educational Community Complex Energy Audit Report

Concord Engineering 1C15142 September 8, 2015 – FINAL Page 1 of 81

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3

II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 10

III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 11

IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ............................................................... 13

A. ENERGY USAGE / TARIFFS ...................................................................................................................... 13

B. ENERGY USE INDEX (EUI) ...................................................................................................................... 18

C. EPA ENERGY BENCHMARKING SYSTEM ................................................................................................. 20

V. FACILITY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 22

VI. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 24

VII. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 25

VIII. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES ................................................ 59

IX. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY .................................. 63

X. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS.......................................................................... 75

A. INCENTIVE PROGRAMS:........................................................................................................................... 75

B. FINANCING OPTIONS: .............................................................................................................................. 77

XI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 80

XII. ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................. 81

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations

Appendix G – Energy Efficient Transformer Analysis



REPORT DISCLAIMER

The information contained within this report, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this report, in whole or in part, without written authorization from Concord Engineering Group, Inc., 520 S. Burnt Mill Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043.

This report may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this report in error, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.



I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the findings of the energy audit conducted for:

Entity: Ventnor City School District

Facility: Ventnor Educational Community Complex 400 N. Lafayette Avenue

Ventnor, New Jersey 08406 Contact Person: Terri Nowotny, Business Administrator

This audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program for the Ventnor City School District. The purpose of this analysis is to provide the owner insight into the energy savings potential that exists within the facility. Energy Efficiency changes and upgrades requires support from the building occupants, operations personnel and the administrators of the building in order to maximize the savings and overall benefit. The efficiency improvement of public buildings provides a benefit for the environment and the residents of New Jersey. The Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) identified within the report represent the potential annual savings at the facility. It is recommended to consider all ECMs as part of the District’s initiative to save energy, reduce emissions, and lower operating costs. The District should review and be familiar with all measures presented in the report prior to making a decision on which projects to move forward with. This will enable the District to effectively align report recommendations with those outlined in their mid/long range facility plans and financial plans. The District should also review all conventional and unconventional funding, along with all NJCEP funding opportunities for these projects and determine which options fit their budget most positively in the short and long term. The combination of this information will enable the District to put together an effective Energy Savings Improvement Strategy that maximizes the received benefits of the selected projects. The annual energy costs at this facility are as follows: The potential annual energy cost savings for each energy conservation measure (ECM) and renewable energy measure (REM) are shown below in Table 1. Be aware that all ECM’s and REM’s are not additive because of the interrelation of some of the measures. This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE Level 2 energy audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analysis would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing.

Electricity $ 278,210

Natural Gas $ 95,536

Total $ 373,566



Table 1 ECM Summary Table

The estimated demand and energy savings for each ECM and REM is shown below in Table 2. The descriptions in this table correspond to the ECM’s and REM’s listed in Table 1.

ECM #1 Rooftop Unit Replacement $591,258 $3,921 150.8 -90.1%

ECM #2 Vending Miser Controls $800 $622 1.3 1066.7%

ECM #3 High Efficiency Transformers $47,000 $5,082 9.2 116.3%

ECM #4 Plug Load Controllers $15,600 $2,551 6.1 145.3%

ECM #5Central DDC System

Expansion$457,200 $9,429 48.5 -58.8%

ECM #6 Refrigerator Replacement $2,060 $115 17.9 -16.3%

ECM #7 Water Conservation $23,000 $720 31.9 -53.0%

ECM #8 EC Motors $5,100 $105 48.6 -69.1%

ECM #9Walk-In Freezer Fan

Controllers$1,950 $240 8.1 84.6%

ECM #10NEMA Premium Efficiency

Motors$3,050 $91 33.5 -55.2%

ECM #11Split Condensing Unit

Replacement$241,932 $2,402 100.7 -85.1%

ECM #12 Interior Lighting Upgrade $223,718 $29,637 7.5 98.7%

ECM #13 Exterior Lighting Upgrade $36,100 $4,609 7.8 91.5%

REM #1 400 kW Solar Array $1,827,549 $148,321 12.3 21.7%

Notes:

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTIONSIMPLE

PAYBACK (Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTIONNET

INSTALLATION COST

ANNUAL

SAVINGSB

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.



Table 2 Energy Savings Summary Table

ECM #1 Rooftop Unit Replacement 25.0 28,009 0

ECM #2 Vending Miser Controls 0.0 4,446 0

ECM #3 High Efficiency Transformers 9.5 36,303 0

ECM #4 Plug Load Controllers 0.0 18,219 0


Expansion0.0 37,720 3,400

ECM #6 Refrigerator Replacement 0.0 824 0

ECM #7 Water Conservation 0.0 0 590

ECM #8 EC Motors 0.0 753 0


Controllers0.0 1,714 0


Motors0.2 653 0


Replacement10.0 17,159 0

ECM #12 Interior Lighting Upgrade 78.9 211,470 0

ECM #13 Exterior Lighting Upgrade 12.8 38,409 0

REM #1 400 kW Solar Array 374.6 508,811 0


ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)



Table 3 Emissions Summary Table

ECM #1 Rooftop Unit Replacement 42,574 78 182

ECM #2 Vending Miser Controls 6,758 12 29

ECM #3 High Efficiency Transformers 55,181 102 236

ECM #4 Plug Load Controllers 27,693 51 118


Expansion97,114 137 245

ECM #6 Refrigerator Replacement 1,252 2 5

ECM #7 Water Conservation 6,903 5 0

ECM #8 EC Motors 1,145 2 5


Controllers2,605 5 11


Motors992 2 4


Replacement26,082 48 112

ECM #12 Interior Lighting Upgrade 321,434 592 1,375

ECM #13 Exterior Lighting Upgrade 58,382 108 250

Notes:


ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION

CO2 EMISSIONS

(LBS)

NOX EMISSIONS

(LBS)

SO2 EMISSIONS

(LBS)

A. Emissions Reduction based on NJCEP published factors for electric & gas.



Table 4 Facility Project Summary Table

The facility peak electrical demand and total project savings meet the qualifications for the Pay for Performance Program. If the owner were to pursue this program option based on the above measures they would receive an estimated $102,088 in incentive dollars, see the Installation Funding Options Section for more detail.

Rooftop Unit Replacement $3,921 $605,000 $13,742 $591,258 150.8

Vending Miser Controls $622 $800 $0 $800 1.3

High Efficiency Transformers

$5,082 $47,000 $0 $47,000 9.2

Plug Load Controllers $2,551 $15,600 $0 $15,600 6.1

Central DDC System Expansion

$9,429 $457,200 $0 $457,200 48.5

Refrigerator Replacement $115 $2,060 $0 $2,060 17.9

Water Conservation $720 $23,000 $0 $23,000 31.9

EC Motors $105 $5,100 $0 $5,100 48.6

Walk-In Freezer Fan Controllers

$240 $2,100 $150 $1,950 8.1

NEMA Premium Efficiency Motors

$91 $3,050 $0 $3,050 33.5

Split Condensing Unit Replacement

$2,402 $247,000 $5,068 $241,932 100.7

Interior Lighting Upgrade $29,637 $247,038 $23,320 $223,718 7.5

Exterior Lighting Upgrade $4,609 $43,000 $6,900 $36,100 7.8

Total Project $59,524 $1,697,948 $49,180 $1,648,768 27.7

FACILITY PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK

SMART START

INCENTIVES



Overall Assessment: Overall, the Ventnor City Educational Complex is operating less efficiently compared to the National Peer Group Median Source Energy Intensity of 141.4 kBtu/square-foot/year of the closest comparable building type “Other Education”. The District is also paying an average in cost of energy at $2.45 per square-foot, which is above typical average costs of $2.00 per square-foot. On the whole, Concord Engineering recommends the District review and be familiar with all measures presented in each facility report prior to making a decision on which projects to move forward with. This will enable the District to effectively align report recommendations with those outlined in their mid/long range facility plans and financial plans. The District should also review all conventional and unconventional funding options, along with all NJCEP funding opportunities for these projects and determine which options fit their budget most positively in the short and long term. The combination of this information will enable the District to put together an effective Energy Savings Improvement Strategy that maximizes the received benefits of the selected projects. The Installation and Funding Options Section further outlines what programs are potentially available to the District for funding the project. Other Considerations: Renewable Energy Conservation Measures: Renewable Energy Measures (REMs) were also reviewed for implementation at the Educational Complex. There is a potential to install solar panels in the parking lot and available roof area. In total the area could accommodate 375 kW of solar arrays. The solar arrays would produce approximately 508,811 kilowatt-hours annually that could reduce the overall electric usage of the facility by 26%. The potential for wind generation was also reviewed for the complex; however based on historical wind speed data and constructability concerns, it is not a viable option. Energy Procurement Recommendations: It is recommended that the District continue its third party purchasing approach for electric and natural gas for this facility. Furthermore, the District should investigate cooperative purchasing groups in the event future cost savings could be realized. Further recommendations are outlined in the Energy Procurement Section of this report that could assist the District in finding additional savings through their utility bills. Maintenance and Operational Recommendations: In addition to the ECMs and REMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide significant energy savings and provide immediate benefit, many of which the District is already performing. The ECMs listed above represent investments that can be made to the facility which are justified by the savings seen over time. However, the maintenance items and small operational improvements below are typically achievable with on-site staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide substantial operational savings compared to



the costs associated. The following are recommendations which should be considered a priority in achieving an energy efficient building, further recommendations per building our provided in the building reports:

1. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors. 2. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output. 3. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and

maintain better IAQ. 4. Shutdown all non-essential equipment during unoccupied periods. 5. Verify all occupied / unoccupied schedules are being fully utilized to setback space

temperature and shut outdoor air dampers.



II. INTRODUCTION

This comprehensive energy audit covers the entire Ventnor Educational Community Complex. The audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program. The energy audit is conducted to promote the mission of the office of Clean Energy, which is to use innovation and technology to solve energy and environmental problems in a way that improves the State’s economy. This can be achieved through the wiser and more efficient use of energy. Electrical and fuel oil utility information is collected and analyzed for one full year’s energy use of the building. The utility information allows for analysis of the complex’s operational characteristics; calculate energy benchmarks for comparison to industry averages, estimated savings potential, and baseline usage/cost to monitor the effectiveness of implemented measures. A computer spreadsheet is used to calculate benchmarks and to graph utility information (see the utility profiles below). The Energy Use Index (EUI) is established for the Main Building. Energy Use Index (EUI) is expressed in British Thermal Units/square foot/year (BTU/ft2/yr), which is used to compare energy consumption to similar building types or to track consumption from year to year in the same building. The EUI is calculated by converting the annual consumption of all energy sources to BTU’s and dividing by the area (gross square footage) of the building. Blueprints (where available) are utilized to verify the gross area of the facility. The EUI is a good indicator of the relative potential for energy savings. A low EUI indicates less potential for energy savings, while a high EUI indicates poor building performance therefore a high potential for energy savings. Existing building architectural and engineering drawings (where available) are utilized for additional background information. The building envelope, lighting systems, HVAC equipment, and controls information gathered from building drawings allow for a more accurate and detailed review of the building. The information is compared to the energy usage profiles developed from utility data. Through the review of the architectural and engineering drawings a building profile can be defined that documents building age, type, usage, major energy consuming equipment or systems, etc. The preliminary audit information is gathered in preparation for the site survey. The site survey provides critical information in deciphering where energy is spent and opportunities exist within a facility. The entire site is surveyed to inventory the following to gain an understanding of how each facility operates:

Building envelope (roof, windows, etc.) Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC) Lighting systems and controls

The site visit is performed to survey all major building components and systems. The site visit includes detailed inspection of energy consuming components. Summary of building occupancy schedules, operating and maintenance practices, and energy management programs provided by the building manager are collected along with the system and components to determine a more accurate impact on energy consumption.



III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS

This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE Level 2 energy audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analyses would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing. Post site visit work includes evaluation of the information gathered, researching possible conservation opportunities, organizing the audit into a comprehensive report, and making recommendations on HVAC, lighting and building envelope improvements. Data collected is processed using energy engineering calculations to anticipate energy usage for each of the proposed energy conservation measures (ECMs). The actual building’s energy usage is entered directly from the utility bills provided by the owner. The anticipated energy usage is compared to the historical data to determine energy savings for the proposed ECMs. It is pertinent to note, that the savings noted in this report are not additive. The savings for each recommendation is calculated as standalone energy conservation measures. Implementation of more than one ECM may in some cases affect the savings of each ECM. The savings may in some cases be relatively higher if an individual ECM is implemented in lieu of multiple recommended ECMs. For example implementing reduced operating schedules for inefficient lighting will result in a greater relative savings. Implementing reduced operating schedules for newly installed efficient lighting will result in a lower relative savings, because there is less energy to be saved. The project/entity summary tables are based on the implementation of multiple measures. The analysis is reviewed and determined if the nature of the ECMs will cause a major conflict of the overall savings. When additive measures do not cause a major effect on the overall savings the ECMs are included. Where a major conflict is identified, the combined savings is evaluated appropriately to ensure the overall estimates are ± 20%. ECMs are determined by identifying the building’s unique properties and deciphering the most beneficial energy saving measures available that meet the specific needs of the facility. The building construction type, function, operational schedule, existing conditions, and foreseen future plans are critical in the evaluation and final recommendations. Energy savings are calculated based on industry standard methods and engineering estimations. Energy consumption is calculated based on manufacturer’s cataloged information when new equipment is proposed. Cost savings are calculated based on the actual historical energy costs for the facility. Installation costs include labor and equipment costs to estimate the full up-front investment required to implement a change. Costs are derived from Means Cost Data, industry publications, and local contractors and equipment suppliers. The NJ Smart Start Building® Program incentives savings (where applicable) are included for the appropriate ECM’s and subtracted from the installed cost. Maintenance savings are calculated where applicable and added to the energy savings for each ECM. The life-time for each ECM is estimated based on the typical life of the equipment being replaced or altered. The costs and savings are applied and a simple payback, simple lifetime savings, and simple return on investment are calculated. See below for calculation methods:



ECM Calculation Equations:

SimplePaybackNetCost

YearlySavings

SimpleLifetimeSavings YearlySavings ECMLifetime

SimpleLifetimeReturnonInvestment ROI SimpleLifetimeSavings NetCost

NetCost

LifetimeMaintenanceSavings YearlyMaintenanceSavings ECMLifetime

NetPresentValue CashFlowofPeriod

1 DR

InternalRateofReturn IRR → NetPresentValue 0 CashFlowofPeriod

1 IRR

Net Present Value calculations are based on Discount Rate (DR) of 3%.



IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST A. Energy Usage / Tariffs The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the owner. Electric Utility Provider: Atlantic City Electric Electric Utility Rate Structure: Annual General Service Secondary Third Party Supplier: First Energy Natural Gas Utility Provider: South Jersey Gas Utility Rate Structure: General Service Gas Third Party Supplier: N/A The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy. The overall cost for utilities is calculated by dividing the total cost by the total usage. Based on the utility history provided, the average cost for utilities at this facility is as follows: Description Average

Electricity 14.0¢ / kWh

Natural Gas $1.22 / therm Energy Cost Index $2.45 / square-foot



Table 5 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Atlantic City ElectricRate: Annual General Service Secondary

Meter No: KZA011478899Account No: 5501 1781 832

Third Party Utility Provider: Amerada Hess / First EnergyTPS Meter / Acct No: -

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION KWH TOTAL BILL

Jun-13 152,200 $20,211

Jul-13 175,000 $23,572

Aug-13 208,600 $27,861

Aug-13 160,439 $21,939

Sep-13 127,245 $17,400

Oct-13 149,017 $20,992

Nov-13 122,166 $17,292

Dec-13 121,325 $17,396

Jan-14 120,545 $17,291

Feb-14 124,341 $17,492

Mar-14 130,085 $18,280

Apr-14 123,994 $17,807

May-14 142,394 $20,105

Jun-14 199,787 $26,391

Jul-14 221,396 $28,602

Aug-14 198,386 $25,217

Sep-14 203,593 $26,682

Oct-14 149,974 $20,355

Nov-14 139,992 $19,569

Dec-14 130,397 $18,073

Jan-15 170,006 $23,904

Feb-15 130,000 $31,258

Mar-15 144,800 $20,200

Apr-15 125,800 $17,853

Total 3,671,482 619.7 Max $515,742

Current 12 Months 1,956,525 619.7 Max $278,210 \

AVERAGE DEMAND 441.5 KW average

AVERAGE RATE $0.140 $/kWh

343.6

314.8

475.8

436.8

336.7

346.4

350.6

511.0

619.7

563.2

460.8

575.6

468.0

570.0

361.6

312.1

513.0

427.3

354.5

340.9

321.1

536.0

528.4

528.4

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND KW



Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile



Table 6 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: South Jersey GasRate: GSG

Meter No: 0351254 & 0351270Account No: 1 15 32 3389 0 9 / 3878700000

Third Party Utility Provider: -TPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

(THERMS)TOTAL BILL

Mar-13 11,430.74 $13,053.67

Apr-13 4,122.36 $4,938.16

May-13 1,619.75 $1,983.06

Jun-13 303.92 $388.33

Jul-13 244.49 $304.81

Aug-13 169.76 $217.23

Sep-13 913.32 $1,070.35

Oct-13 2,471.04 $2,776.57

Nov-13 8,672.16 $9,700.35

Dec-13 11,045.20 $12,750.06

Jan-14 13,147.20 $15,809.89

Feb-14 15,225.00 $22,715.24

Apr-14 14,546.24 $18,284.89

May-14 7,502.40 $9,183.83

Jun-14 1,310.40 $1,648.33

Jul-14 335.68 $432.71

Jul-14 189.90 $248.27

Aug-14 200.45 $245.51

Sep-14 273.78 $333.88

Oct-14 1,674.27 $1,902.93

Nov-14 8,331.84 $9,177.20

Dec-14 12,754.62 $15,373.05

Total 116,484.52 $142,538.32

Current 12 Months 75,491.78 $95,355.73

AVERAGE RATE: $1.22 $/THERM

-

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY



Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile



B. Energy Use Index (EUI) Energy Use Index (EUI) is a measure of a building’s annual energy utilization per square foot of building. This calculation is completed by converting all utility usage consumed by a building for one year, to British Thermal Units (BTU) and dividing this number by the building square footage. EUI is a good measure of a building’s energy use and is utilized regularly for comparison of energy performance for similar building types. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Buildings Technology Center under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy maintains a Benchmarking Building Energy Performance Program. The ORNL website determines how a building’s energy use compares with similar facilities throughout the U.S. and in a specific region or State. Source use differs from site usage when comparing a building’s energy consumption with the national average. Site energy use is the energy consumed by the building at the building site only. Source energy use includes the site energy use as well as all of the losses to create and distribute the energy to the building. Source energy represents the total amount of raw fuel that is required to operate the building. It incorporates all transmission, delivery, and production losses, which allows for a complete assessment of energy efficiency in a building. The type of utility purchased has a substantial impact on the source energy use of a building. The EPA has determined that source energy is the most comparable unit for evaluation purposes and overall global impact. Both the site and source EUI ratings for the building are provided to understand and compare the differences in energy use. The site and source EUI for this facility is calculated as follows:

BuildingSiteEUIElectricUsageinkBtu FuelUsageinkBtu

BuildingSquareFootage

BuildingSourceEUIElectricUsageinkBtu SSRatio FuelUsageinkBtu SSRatio

BuildingSquareFootage



Table 7 Energy Use Index Summary

The chart above depicts the Site and Source Energy for the facility. The comparable building type in this instance is classified as “K-12 School” with a median Site Energy of 58.2 kBtu/SF and a Source Energy of 141.4 kBtu/SF as obtained from the U.S. National Peer Group Comparison Rating published by Department of Energy in July, 2013. The Median Source Energy Use Intensity is the recommended benchmark metric for all buildings, and is the middle value of the national population meaning half the buildings use more energy, and half use less. The reference source for this data comes from the Department of Energy’s Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS).

kWh Therms Gallons kBtu kBtu

ELECTRIC 1,956,525.0 6,679,576 3.140 20,973,870

NATURAL GAS 75,491.8 7,549,178 1.050 7,926,637

TOTAL 14,228,754 28,900,507

BUILDING TYPE

BUILDING AREA 152,357 SQUARE FEET

BUILDING SITE EUI 93.39 kBtu/SF/YR 58.2 kBtu/SF/YR

BUILDING SOURCE EUI 189.69 kBtu/SF/YR 141.4 kBtu/SF/YR

34%

ENERGY USE INTENSITY CALCULATION

ENERGY TYPEBUILDING USE

SITE ENERGY

SITE-SOURCE RATIO

SOURCE ENERGY

*Site - Source Ratio data is provided by the Energy Star Performance Rating Methodology for Incorporating Source Energy Use document.

AUDITED BUILDING PEER COMPARISON

K-12 School K-12 School

Less Efficient than PEER Comparison



C. EPA Energy Benchmarking System The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in an effort to promote energy management has created a system for benchmarking energy use amongst various end users. The benchmarking tool utilized for this analysis is entitled Portfolio Manager. The Portfolio Manager tool allows tracking and assessment of energy consumption via the template forms located on the ENERGY STAR website (www.energystar.gov). The importance of benchmarking for local government municipalities is becoming more important as utility costs continue to increase and emphasis is being placed on carbon reduction, greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts. Based on information gathered from the ENERGY STAR website, Government agencies spend more than $10 billion a year on energy to provide public services and meet constituent needs. Furthermore, energy use in commercial buildings and industrial facilities is responsible for more than 50 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. It is vital that local government municipalities assess facility energy usage, benchmark energy usage utilizing Portfolio Manager, set priorities and goals to lessen energy usage and move forward with priorities and goals. In accordance with the Local Government Energy Audit Program, CEG has created an ENERGY STAR account for the District to access and monitoring the complex’s yearly energy usage as it compares to facilities of similar type. The login page for the account can be accessed at the following web address; the username and password are also listed below:

https://www.energystar.gov/istar/pmpam/index.cfm?fuseaction=login.login

The above log in information allows the District to continue to utilize Portfolio Manager to track and monitor their energy performance. For further direction on how to use the Portfolio Manager Tool such as adding properties, entering data, and viewing results, see training material and live training sessions provided by Energy Star that can be found on their website at www.energystar.gov/buildings/training



The utility bills and other information gathered during the energy audit process are entered into the Portfolio Manager. The following is a summary of the results for the facility:

Table 8 ENERGY STAR Performance Rating

ENERGY STAR PERFORMANCE RATING

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

ENERGY PERFORMANCE

RATING

NATIONAL AVERAGE

Ventnor City Educational Complex

9 50

Refer to Statement of Energy Performance Appendix for the detailed energy summary for the complex.



V. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The Ventnor Education Community Complex is located at 400 North Lafayette Street in Ventnor City, New Jersey. The 152,357 SF building was originally built in 1969 with renovations in 1974, 1997, and 2001. The building is a single-story facility comprised of a main office, classrooms, gymnasium, a cafeteria, a kitchen, a library, a nurse’s offices, a music room, a band room, a faculty room, restrooms, Board of Education Offices, boiler rooms and other utility/storage rooms. Occupancy Profile

The typical hours of operation for the school are Monday through Friday between 7:00 am and 4:00 PM, with the Community utilizing the facility until 9 PM. The facility is used year round by the community and camps are run throughout the summer. The school has an enrollment of approximately 770 students and 127 staff. Building Envelope

Exterior walls for school are masonry brick faced with concrete block interior walls. The windows throughout are in good condition and are double pane, operable, ¼” coated glass with aluminum frames. The roof is a flat built up roof with rubber overlay. Insulation is estimated to range between 2 and 5 inches. HVAC Systems

The Educational Complex is conditioned through a variety of systems including packaged rooftop units, split system cooling air handlers, Airedale self-contained units, and two central hot water boiler plants. Overall the entire building is heated and cooled via one of these systems. The Boiler Room located in the 600 wing consists of two Paterson Kelley C-2000 natural gas fired condensing boilers. These units are five years old and have an input rating of 2,000 MBH and efficiency rating up to 95%. Each boiler has a primary circulator pump to maintain minimum flow through the boiler rated at 1 horsepower. Heating water is distributed to the systems via two pairs of pumps, one rated at 3 horsepower, and the second at 5 horsepower. The Boiler Room located in the 300 wing consists of two Paterson Kelley C-2500 natural gas fired condensing boilers. These units were installed within the last year and have an input rating of 2,500 MBH and efficiency rating up to 93.4%. Each boiler has a primary circulator pump to maintain minimum flow through the boiler rated at ¾ horsepower. Heating water is distributed to the systems via two pairs of pumps with variable frequency drives, and both sets have 5 horsepower motors. The classrooms in the 100, 200, and 300 wings are conditioned by vertical Airedale unit ventilators with packaged direct expansion cooling, hot water heating, and energy recovery. These units are each rated for 3-tons of cooling and are located in the room they are serving. Areas in these classroom wings not conditioned by an Airedale unit, have a packaged rooftop



unit satisfying the space. Typical rooftops range from 2 to 20 tons of cooling capacity, dependent on the size of the zone they are feeding. The Gymnasium is conditioned by two large 120 ton split rooftop air handling units with gas-fired heating and direct expansion cooling. The existing units were manufactured by McQuay, however the units were slated for replacement during summer 2015. The new units will be identical in capacity, but will be much higher in efficiency compared to the existing units. The Cafeteria is conditioned by a single large 80 ton split rooftop air handling unit with gas-fired heating and direct expansion cooling. The unit is manufactured by Carrier and is constant volume. The Kitchen has a direct make up air unit with gas fired heating manufactured by ARES, in addition to a Carrier packaged rooftop unit that serves the kitchen. Exhaust System

General and toilet exhaust air is removed through roof mounted down blast mushroom style fans. The kitchen exhaust hood is tied to an up blast Cook grease fan with a 2 horsepower motor and approximately 5,000 CFM of exhaust air. HVAC System Controls

The HVAC systems within the building are controlled by two DDC systems including a Schneider Electric and Niagara based system. The old Robertshaw pneumatic control system was integrated into the Niagara system, but still utilizes the end device pneumatic controllers coupled with a single air compressor. The two systems act independently of one another and control different parts and HVAC systems in the facility. Systems not controlled under these, are controlled through local thermostats. Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water is provided by a two systems, one located in each boiler room. The boiler room in the 600 wing has two A.O. Smith Cyclone Model BTH Series 199 MBH high efficiency boilers with 100 gallons of storage. The boiler room in the 300 wing has two Bradford White Model EF Series 399 MBH with 100 gallons of storage. Kitchen Equipment

The kitchen has several pieces of gas fired kitchen equipment including two double stacked convection ovens, a braising pan, a steam kettle, and a four burner combination range. The kitchen has one primary walk-in cooler and freezer, and several reach-in refrigerators and freezers. Dishwashing is done by a Hobart Model CRS66A with a Hatco 58 kW electric booster heater. Lighting

Grade Lighting Audit Appendix for a detailed list of the lighting throughout the facility and estimated operating hours per space.



VI. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the complex and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix. Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.



VII. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES

ECM #1: Replace Rooftop Units with High Efficiency Units

Description:

The Ventnor City Educational Complex has many areas heated and cooled with packaged rooftop units. The facility has two (2) 120 ton McQuay units, six (6) 5 ton Carrier units, five (5) 4 ton Carrier units, eight (8) 2 ton Carrier units, one (1) 20 ton McQuay unit, three (3) 10 ton Carrier units, two (2) 12.5 ton Carrier units, one (1) 7.5 ton Carrier unit, eight (8) 3 ton Carrier units, one (1) 8.5 ton Carrier unit, one (1) 80 ton Carrier unit, and one (1) 20 ton Lennox unit. Each unit is equipped with direct expansion cooling and a gas fired furnace.

The units are in various states of condition and many units in operation are not high efficiency units. Additionally, most of the units are reaching the end of their ASHRAE useful service life.

These units can be replaced with new high efficiency units. New units provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and higher efficiency refrigerants such as R410A.

This ECM includes one-for-one replacement of the older rooftop units with new higher efficiency systems. The 80 ton split unit will be replaced with a single packaged unit. Its existing condensing unit will be demolished. Since Concord has been informed that the two 120 ton McQuay units serving the gymnasium areas are being replaced this summer, these units have been omitted from any recommendations. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of the unit replacement for this ECM can be found in the table below:

ECM INPUTS SERVICE FORNUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/HR

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONSREPLACE UNIT WITH

RTU RTU-9 1 60,000 5.0 Carrier 48LC WeatherExpert 5 Ton Unit

RTU RTU-19, 25, 23 3 48,000 12.0 Carrier 48LC WeatherExpert 4 Ton Unit

RTU RTU-7 1 24,000 2.0 Carrier 48VL-A Performance 2 Ton Unit




RTU RTU 1 102,000 8.5 Carrier 48LC WeatherExpert 8.5 Ton Unit

RTU RTU-14 1 960,000 80.0 Carrier 48N WeatherExpert 80 Ton Unit


RTU RTU-26 1 150,000 12.5 Carrier 48LC WeatherExpert 12.5 Ton Unit

RTU RTU 1 60,000 5.0 Carrier 48LC WeatherExpert 5 Ton Unit

Total 13 2,040,000 178.0

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY



The manufacturer used as the basis for the calculation is Carrier. The unit pricing and install cost were estimated based on current rates quotes and labor rates. The payback may change based on actual unit pricing and install costs if the ECM is implemented. Energy Savings Calculations:

Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

EnergySavings, kWh CoolingCapacity,BTUHr

1SEER

1SEER

OperationHours

1000 WkWh

DemandSavings, kWEnergySavings kWhHoursofCooling

CoolingCostSavings EnergySavings, kWh CostofElectricity$

kWh

ECM INPUTS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

EXISTING UNITS EER

SPLIT UNITS EER

# OF UNITS

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

DEMAND SAVINGS

kW

RTU 60,000 1,131 11 EER 12.7 EER 1 826 0.7

RTU 48,000 1,131 11.05 EER 13.1 EER 3 2,306 2.0

RTU 24,000 1,131 12 SEER 14 SEER 1 323 0.3

RTU 240,000 1,131 10.1 EER 12 EER 1 4,255 3.8

RTU 120,000 1,131 9 EER 13 EER 1 4,640 4.1

RTU 36,000 1,131 11.2 EER 12.8 EER 1 454 0.4

RTU 102,000 1,131 10.8 EER 13.5 EER 1 2,136 1.9

RTU 960,000 1,131 10.1 EER 10.9 EER 1 7,890 7.0

RTU 240,000 1,131 11 EER 12 EER 1 2,056 1.8

RTU 150,000 1,131 10.6 EER 12.4 EER 1 2,323 2.1

RTU 60,000 1,131 11.05 EER 12.7 EER 1 798 0.7

Total 13 28,009 25

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS



Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings

From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the rebate is $92 per ton for a 5 ton unit, $40 per ton for a 50 ton unit, and $72 per ton for a 70 ton unit. Cost estimates are based on RS Means Unit Cost Data.

There is no significant maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $605,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $13,742

Net Installation Cost ($): $591,258

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,921

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,921

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 150.8

Simple Lifetime ROI -90.1%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $58,815

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -21%

Net Present Value (NPV) ($544,449.36)

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY



ECM #2: Vending Miser Controls Description: The Ventnor City Educational Complex currently utilizes vending machines in select areas within the building. Vending machines are located in the faculty lunch room and in the hallway by the gym which can be in use for a limited time during the day. The installation of the Vending Miser system will help reduce the operating hours of vending machines. Cold beverage machines regularly operate inefficiently trying to maintain a constant cool temperature within the machine and snack machines with no cooling usually have lights that operate 24/7. The VendingMiser® system incorporates innovative energy-saving technology into a small plug-and-play device that in conjunction with a passive infrared sensor regulate the operation of the cold beverage and snack machines based on occupancy and room temperature. This ECM approximates the installation of two (2) for the cold beverage machines and one (1) for the snack machine. Energy Savings Calculations:

Energy Analysis Prepared For: Energy Costs ($0.000 per kwh) $0.140Facility Occupied Hours per Week 60

Ventnor City Educationa l Complex Number of Cold Drink Vending Machines 2Number of Uncooled Snack Machines 1

www.VendingMiserStore.com Power Requirements of Cold Drink Machine (avg watts) 427Power Requirements of Snack Machine (avg wa tts) 80VendingMiser Sa le Price (for cold drink machines) $300.00OfficeMiser Sa le Price (for snack machines) $200.00

Savings AnalysisBefore After

Cold Drink Machines $1,048.06 $488.52 Cost of Opera tion

7,486 3,489 kWh

53% % Energy Savings

Snack Machines $97.84 $34.94 Cost of Opera tion699 250 kWh

64% % Energy Savings

Input Variables

Cold Drink and Snack Vending Machine Energy Conservation



Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $800

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $800


Energy Savings ($/Yr): $622

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $622


Simple Payback 1.3

Simple Lifetime ROI 1066.7%



Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 78%

Net Present Value (NPV) $6,628.26




ECM #3: High Efficiency Transformers Description: Electrical distribution transformers play a key role in delivering electrical power to buildings as all the electrical power supplied to the building flows through them. Whether equipment is plugged in and turned on or not transformers continue to operate. Consider their impact on electricity consumption. Some transformers waste as much as 20% of billed electricity. Older transformers in existing buildings may not have been built to meet the load requirements of today. Over the years electrical distribution has changed very little, however the connected equipment has changed dramatically. This dramatic change is derived from both the type of equipment (mostly electronic in nature) and the density of installed equipment. The impact of this change has had a direct impact on power quality and transformer efficiency. When newer electronic equipment is introduced into buildings with older electrical systems power quality and transformer efficiency can suffer. According to a Department of Energy study performed in 1996 electronic equipment can increase losses by as much as 2.7 times. In real terms this would mean that a transformer that has a nameplate efficiency of 97% in reality is operating closer to 90% or lower. The difference represents additional costs to operate the transformer. Replacing your older transformers with Power smiths energy efficient E-Saver-C3 or T1000-C3 transformers can improve the reliability of your electronic equipment and significantly reduce electricity waste. Power smith’s energy efficient transformers have substantially lower losses (higher efficiency) than other transformers. These energy savings mean less kilowatt-hours (kWh) consumed and lower energy bills. Electricity demand charges also decline, thanks to reduced energy losses. These savings pay for the transformer many times over its installed life. There is one (1) transformer rated at 500kVA located in the Ventnor City Educational Complex that is a suitable candidate for replacement. Based on the age and efficiency of this transformer, upgrading it up to today’s standards could reduce losses significantly. Energy Savings Calculations: See Appendix for Manufacturers Transformer Calculation Spreadsheet.

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 9.5Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 36,303

Electric Cost Savings ($) $5,082

TRANSFORMER SAVINGS SUMMARY











Simple Payback 9.2









ECM #4: Plug Load Management Description: The Ventnor City Educational Complex has many types of plug in type equipment from computer monitors, copiers/printers, projectors, and other office equipment. As technology continues to advance and be integrated into society and the work environment, the devices in most instances require electrical power either a battery or power outlet. The increase in use of these devices is contributing vastly to the increase in electric usage at facilities and according to a study performed by the California Energy Commission can account for more than 20% of electricity use. In most instances these devices are left plugged in and sometimes on continuously whether occupants are present or not leading to a significant amount of wasted energy. By managing these loads with intelligent outlet receptacles facility and energy management staff can reduce the consumption of these devices and better control energy waste. The installation of a plug load management system with wireless controlled outlets will enable facility staff and energy managers to control the power draw of these systems during unoccupied periods. For cost estimating purposes a total of 110 outlets would be controlled by this system, further refinement of this number should be performed before installation. The basis of this measure is a “Bert” plug load management system with a network interface control system.

Energy Savings Calculations: Data published by the DOE’s Energy and Information Administration Commercial Buildings Consumption Survey states energy use breakouts for various types of buildings. This survey data was used to estimate the building energy consumption associated with Office Type Equipment. Savings are based on a ten (10%) percent reduction of the electric usage associated with interior equipment usage.




ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Plug Load Usage Electric (kBtu) 621,648 559,483 62,165

Savings Percentage - 10.0%

Electric Site Conversion (kWh/kBtu) 3.412 3.412

Electric Cost ($/kWh) $0.140 $0.140

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Usage (kWh) 182,195 163,975 18,219

Energy Cost ($) $25,507 $22,957 $2,551

COMMENTS:

PLUG LOAD MANAGEMENT SAVINGS CALCULATIONS









Simple Payback 6.1









ECM #5: Digital Energy Management System (DDC EMS) Description:

The Ventnor City Educational Complex currently has a pneumatic control system with front end DDC controls. The installation of a DDC system to control the air handlers, unit ventilators, and integrating the existing DDC Niagara platform equipment could yield significant savings through nighttime setback, temperature reset capability, and improvement maintenance response time to outages and breakdowns. This ECM includes installation of DDC controls on the HVAC equipment in the facility. The system will include new air handler controls, new thermostats, and unit ventilator control valves, exhaust fan on/off controllers, in addition to the existing front end computer and main controller. With the communication between the control devices and the existing Niagara interface, the facility manager will be able to take advantage of scheduling for occupied and unoccupied periods based on the actual occupancy of each space in the facility. Due to the fact that the facility has diverse hours of occupancy, including evening and weekend activities, having supervisory control over all of the equipment makes sense. The DDC system will also aid in the response time to service / maintenance issues when the facility is not under normal maintenance supervision, i.e. after-hours. The Central DDC system installation has the potential to provide significant savings by controlling the HVAC systems as a whole and provide operating schedules and features such as space averaging, night set-back, temperature override control, outside temperature reset, etc. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that public school buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the referenced report:

Energy Management and Control System Savings: 5%-15%. Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 5% of the electricity and 5% of the natural gas utility used to heat and cool the facility.

The basis for the DDC system expansion is the Andover Energy Management System or similar.



Energy Savings Calculations:

Energy savings for each utility is calculated with the equation below.

EnergySavings Utility CurrentEnergyConsumption EstimatedSavings,% Following table summarizes energy savings via implementation of a Digital Energy Management System:


ECM INPUTSPneumatic / Partial

DDCFull DDC Controls

Existing Gas Usage (Therms) 68,003 -

Existing Electricity Usage for HVAC (kWh)

754,395 -

Energy Savings, Gas - 5%

Energy Savings, Electricity - 5%

Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.220 $1.220

Electricity Cost ($/kWh) $0.140 $0.140


Gas Usage (Therms) 68,003 64,603 3,400

Electricity Usage (kWh) 754,395 716,675 37,720

Gas Cost ($) $82,964 $78,816 $4,148

Electricity Cost ($) $105,615 $100,334 $5,281

Energy Cost ($) $188,579 $179,150 $9,429

COMMENTS:

DDC ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSYEM CALCULATIONS




Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based off RS Means Unit Cost data. Energy Savings Summary:








Simple Payback 48.5









ECM #6: Refrigerator Replacement

Description: There are residential style refrigerators located in the teacher’s cafeteria and lounge, nurse’s office, and a classroom. These units are older models that are not nearly as energy efficient as refrigerators manufactured today. The proposed replacement is a one-for-one with a unit of similar size and dimensions that has the most up-to-date Energy Star Rating. The models selected are manufactured by Whirlpool and Kenmore. Energy Savings Calculations:


Quantity 3 3

Manufacturer KenmoreWhirlpool (x2),

Kenmore

TypeSide by Side, Top

Freezer (x3)Side by Side , Top

Freezer (x3)

Model 52512100,

25361462100, 564.891282

WRS325FNAM, WRT134TFD,

WRT134TFD, 99763

Size (Cu-Ft) 25.4, 14.4, 14.4, 2.8 25.4, 14.4, 14.4, 3.1

Electric Rate ($/kWh) $0.140 $0.140

Electric Usage (kWh) 1,996 1,172 824

Energy Cost ($) $279 $164 $115COMMENTS:

ENERGY STAR REFRIGERATOR CALCULATION


Calculations based Energy Star Website http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=refrig.calculator











Simple Payback 17.9


Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0



Net Present Value (NPV) ($687.14)




ECM #7: Water Conservation Description: The Ventnor City Educational Complex utilizes standard plumbing fixtures with manual levers. The typical water faucet consumption only meets the minimum federal required standard for water efficiency. New fixtures are available that use less water than today’s requirements and can add up to significant water reduction over a long period. This ECM includes the replacement of the existing faucets within the facility with new low flow faucets. The estimated usage of the plumbing fixtures is based on the estimated usage per day for each device and the facility operating days per year. The number of plumbing fixtures to be replaced is based on observations of the facility. The proposed retrofit includes installation of new metered sinks rated at 0.5 GPM. Energy Savings Calculations: Faucets:

WaterUsage Quantity OperationDaysyr

UsageMinDay

FixtureGalMin

ElectricUsage

FaucetWaterUsage Gal 8.33lbsGal

SpecificHeat 1 ∆T 70

3,413Btu

1HWHEfficiency

50%

NaturalGasUsage

FaucetWaterUsage Gal 8.33lbsGal

SpecificHeat 1 ∆T 70

100,000Btu

1HWHEfficiency

50%



The cost for installation and materials is based on 60 metered sinks. There are no Smart Start rebates for installation of low flow plumbing fixtures.


Quantity of Sinks 60 60

Flow Rate (GPM) 2.2 0.5 1.7

Device Usage (min per day) 10 8

Facility Operation (days / year) 180 180

Heat Content of Water (Btu/gal/°F) 8.33 8.33

Temperature Rise (°F) 70.0 70.0

Efficiency of Heating System (%) 96% 96%

Natural Gas Rate ($/therm) $1.220 $1.220

Water Rate ($/1000gal) $0.000 $0.000

Natural Gas Usage (Therm) 722 131 590

Water Usage (gallons) 237,600 43,200 194,400

Energy Cost ($) $880 $160 $720COMMENTS:

LOW FLOW WATER SAVING DEVICES


Heating Savings based on 50% Hot Cold Mix. 20% reduction in time based on new metered sinks











Simple Payback 31.9









ECM #8: EC Motors on Small Exhaust Fans Description: Electronically Commutated Motors (ECM) are proven to generate substantial savings on small motor applications. These motors currently are available in sizes up to 1 horsepower, and provide efficiencies similar to how NEMA premium efficiency motor would at a large horsepower. The motor works much like a direct current (DC) motor and is without mechanical brushes and the commuter reduces friction losses in the motor. The motors are programmable and can be used for a wide range of applications. This measure would replace the existing fan motors in the rooftop exhaust fans that have fractional horsepower. In total there are approximately two 1/20 HP motors, one 1/8 HP motor, and one 1/6 HP motor. Energy Savings Calculations: Measured savings for ECM motors has proven that up to 65% reduction in power can be realized through the installation these motors.

ElectricEnergy kWhAmps Volts Phase /

1000 PowerFactor OperatingHours

EnergySavings ElectricEnergy PowerReduction 40%

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 0.0Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 753

Electric Cost Savings ($) $105

EC MOTOR SAVINGS SUMMARY



ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS PSC ECM

Quantity of Motors 2 2

Motor Nameplate HP 1/20 1/20

Full Load Amps 2.5

Voltage 115 115

Phase 1 1

Power Factor 55% 55%

Operating Hrs 2400 2400

Load Reduction - 40.0%

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.140 0.140


Electric Energy (kWh) 759 455 304

Electric Energy Cost ($) $106 $64 $43

ELECTRONICALLY COMMUTATED MOTOR CALULATION


COMMENTS: Rooftop Exhaust Fans






Full Load Amps 2.6

Voltage 115 115

Phase 1 1




Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.140 0.140






COMMENTS: Rooftop Exhaust Fan



Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based off RS Means Unit Cost data.




Full Load Amps 4.8

Voltage 115 115

Phase 1 1




Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.140 0.140






COMMENTS: Rooftop Exhaust Fan











Simple Payback 48.6









ECM #9: Walk-In Controls The Ventnor City Educational Complex has one walk-in cooler/freezer that stores food for the kitchen. The walk-in has a total of six (6) evaporator fans, three (3) per unit, to circulate cold air These fans operate continuously whether the compressor is on or off resulting in unnecessary heat buildup in the box due to the fan motors. This measure would install evaporator fan controllers and EC Motors that features two-speed operation of the evaporator fans – high speed during cooling and low speed or off when not cooling manufactured by Frigitek or equivalent. Energy Savings Calculations: Energy savings calculations are based on New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Protocols to Measure Resource Savings. The energy savings are calculated using existing equipment characteristics.

kWhSavingsEvapFansAmps Volts Phase

1000 0.55 8760 35.52%

kWhSavingsEvapReducedHeat kWhSavingsEvapFans 0.28 1.6 kWhSavingsControls

Amps Volts Phase

1000 0.85

35% 2,195Hrs 55% 6,565Hrs

Amps Volts Phase

1000 0.55 8760 35.52% 5%

CALCULATION CONSTANTS

Evaporator Fan Motor Power Factor 0.55 Conversion kW to ton (Refrigeration) 0.28 Efficiency of Typical System (kW/ton) 1.6 Compressor Power Factor 0.85 Compressor Winter Runtime 2195 Compressor Winter Duty Cycle 35% Compressor Non-Winter Runtime 6565 Compressor Non-Winter Duty Cycle 55% Reduced Runtime due to Controls 5% Percent Time Evaporator is Turned Off 35.52%



ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS No Controller Frigitek Controller

Qty of Evaporator Fans 6 6

Nameplate Amps of Evap Fan 1.0 1.0

Nameplate Volts of Evap Fan 115 115

Phase of Evap Fan 1 1

Nameplate Amps of Compressor

6.0 6.0

Nameplate Volts of Compressor

230 230

Phase of Compressor 3 3

Elec Cost ($/kWh) $0.140 $0.140


Evaporator Fan Usage (KWH) 3,324 2,144 1,181

Evap Fan Heat Usage (KWH) 248 160 88

Compressor Usage (KWH) 8,897 8,452 445

Total Electric Usage (KWH) 12,469 10,756 1,714

Electric Cost ($) $1,746 $1,506 $240

COMMENTS:

WALK-IN COOLER/FREEZER EVAPORATOR FAN CONTROL












Simple Payback 8.1





Net Present Value (NPV) $915.10




ECM #10: Install NEMA Premium® Efficiency Motors Description: The improved efficiency of the NEMA Premium® efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate continuously 24 hours a day, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. The electric motors driving the older hot water pumps are candidates for replacing with premium efficiency motors. These standard efficiency motors run considerable amount of time over a year. This energy conservation measure replaces existing inefficient electric motors with NEMA Premium® efficiency motors. NEMA Premium® is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today.

Energy Savings Calculations:

Electricusage, kWhHP LF 0.746 HoursofOperation

MotorEfficiency

where, HP MotorNameplateHorsepowerRating LF LoadFactor MotorEfficiency MotorNameplateEfficiency ElectricUsageSavings, kWh ElectricUsage ElectricUsage

Electriccostsavings ElectricUsageSavings ElectricRate$

kWh

The calculations were carried out and the results are tabulated in the table below:


EQMTID

FUNCTIONMOTOR

HPHOURS OF

OPERATIONEXISTING

EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCYP-3 Heating Hot Water Pump 5 3,391 87.5% 90.2%P-4 Heating Hot Water Pump 5 3,391 87.5% 90.2%



Project Cost, Incentives, and Maintenance Savings: Project costs are based on RS Means Unit Costs and vendor quote data. There are no SmartStart Building® incentives for premium efficiency motors.


PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR CALCULATIONS

EQMTID

MOTOR HP

LOAD FACTOR

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCY

POWER SAVINGS

kW

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWH

COST SAVINGS

P-3 5 75% 87.5% 90.2% 0.10 326 $46P-4 5 75% 87.5% 90.2% 0.10 326 $46

TOTAL 0.2 652.5 $91








Simple Payback 33.5









ECM #11: Replace Split Condensing Units

Description:

The Ventnor City Educational Complex has fifteen (15) split system air conditioning only units which serve various spaces. Many of these units are nearing the end of their ASHRAE service life expectancy of 20 years. Replacing these units with newer more efficient units could result in significant energy savings.

Most of the units currently installed are lower efficiency compared to modern units. The units can be replaced with new high-efficiency units. New units provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, higher efficiency refrigerants such as R410A. This ECM includes one-for-one replacement of the seven (7) older split system units with new higher efficiency systems as well as replacing the indoor unit or indoor coil. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of the unit replacement for this ECM can be found in the table below:

Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

EnergySavings, kWh CoolingCapacity,BTUHr

1SEER

1SEER

OperationHours

1000 WkWh

DemandSavings, kWEnergySavings kWhHoursofCooling

CoolingCostSavings EnergySavings, kWh CostofElectricity$

kWh

ECM INPUTSNUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/HR

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONSREPLACE UNIT WITH

SS 1 150,000 12.5 Trane TTA 12.5 Ton Condensing Unit

SS 2 36,000 6.0 Carrier 24ANB1 3 Ton Condensing Unit

SS 1 36,000 3.0 Mitsubishi PKAA036

SS 1 120,000 10.0 Trane TTA 10 Ton Condensing Unit

SS 1 300,000 25.0 Trane RAUJ 25 Ton Condensing Unit

SS 1 90,000 7.5 Trane TTA 7.5 Ton Condensing Unit

Total 7 732,000 64




Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings The manufacturers used as the basis for the calculation are Trane, Carrier, Mitsubishi, and/or equal. The unit pricing and install cost were estimated based on RS Means unit cost data and vendor quotes. The payback may change based on actual unit pricing and install costs if the ECM is implemented. From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the replacement of split system AC units and unitary systems with high efficiency AC systems falls under the category “Unitary HVAC Split System” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency (EER/SEER). The program incentives are calculated as follows:

Incentive$/TonTonsCoolingIncentiveStartSmart

No maintenance savings were estimated for this measure.

ECM INPUTS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

EXISTING UNITS

EFFICIENCY

NEW UNITS EFFICIENCY

# OF UNITS

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

DEMAND SAVINGS

kW

SS 150,000 1,131 10.1 EER 11.7 EER 1 2,297 1.4

SS 36,000 1,131 10 SEER 21 SEER 2 4,265 2.5

SS 36,000 1,131 10.8 SEER 14 SEER 1 862 0.5

SS 120,000 1,131 10.1 EER 12.2 EER 1 2,313 1.4

SS 300,000 1,131 10.1 EER 12.1 EER 1 5,553 3.3

SS 90,000 1,131 10.1 EER 12.4 EER 1 1,869 1.1

Total 7 17,159 10


UNIT DESCRIPTION

REBATE $/TON

PROPOSED CAPACITY

TONS

TOTAL REBATE

$≥20 to 30 tons $79 25.0 $1,975

≥11.25 to <20 tons $79 12.5 $987.50

Between 5.4 and 11.25 Tons

$73 17.5 $1,277.50

5.4 tons or less $92 9.0 $828

TOTAL 64 $5,068

Unitary HVAC UNITS REBATE SUMMARY











Simple Payback 100.7









ECM #12: Interior Lighting Upgrades Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout the Ventnor City Educational Complex is provided by 1x4, 2x4, and 2x2 fluorescent fixtures with T12 lamps and newer generation 700 Series 32W T8 lamps, CFL pin based and A-lamp bulbs, and incandescent A-lamp bulbs. The new and old gymnasiums at the Ventnor City Educational Complex are mainly lit by 1x4 pendant-mounted fixtures containing T5 lamps, with the newer gym, in outlying areas, utilizing several 2x2 recessed fixtures containing T8 F17 lamps. It is recommended that almost all fixtures within the building be replaced with LED equivalent tube lamps, screw-in bulbs, and Terralux LED fixtures due to their efficiency and low power usage. It is recommended that areas with minimal burn hours lit by CFLs be left unchanged. For the gymnasium areas, Concord Engineering recommends replacing all of the lamps in the 2x2 fixtures with new 2 foot LED tube lamps. The pendant fixtures containing T5 lamps will remain unchanged due to the high initial cost and minimal savings associated with upgrading these fixtures to an LED equivalent. This ECM includes replacing and retrofitting all of the interior lighting throughout the school with new LED type screw-in bulbs, tube lamps, and Terralux LED fixtures, with the exception that the T5 gymnasium fixtures and CFL-lit areas with minimal burn hours be left as is. It is recommended that the School District consult with a lighting engineer prior to retrofitting or replacing interior fixtures to ensure code required minimum light levels will be met. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed new fixtures/retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of interior fixtures in the school.

Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based off RS Means Unit Cost Data and Vendor quotes.



LIGHTING UPGRADE SAVINGS SUMMARY











Simple Payback 7.5









ECM #13: Exterior Lighting Upgrade Description: The exterior lighting at the Ventnor City Educational Complex includes exterior building and parking lot lighting. The exterior of the building is currently lit by metal halide downlights, metal halide recessed fixtures, metal halide wall packs, metal halide pole-mounted shoebox fixtures, and pin and screw-in compact fluorescent bulbs. Concord Engineering recommends upgrading all of the exterior lighting, except for the compact fluorescent lamps, to an energy-efficient lighting system that includes Terralux and Neptun LED fixtures, LED wall packs, and LED replacement bulbs. This ECM would replace the existing exterior lamps and fixtures, except compact fluorescent fixtures, with equivalent LED lamps and fixtures. Energy Savings Calculations: A detailed Investment Grade Lighting Audit can be found in Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix that outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods.

Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based off RS Means Unit Cost Data and Vendor quotes.



LIGHTING UPGRADE SAVINGS SUMMARY











Simple Payback 6.7









VIII. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES Globally, renewable energy has become a priority affecting international and domestic energy policy. The State of New Jersey has taken a proactive approach, and has adopted in its Energy Master Plan a goal of 30% renewable energy by 2020. To help reach this goal, New Jersey created the Office of Clean Energy under the direction of the Board of Public Utilities and instituted a Renewable Energy Incentive Program to provide additional funding to private and public entities for installing qualified renewable technologies. A renewable energy source can greatly reduce a building’s operating expenses while producing clean environmentally friendly energy. Concord Engineering has assessed the feasibility of installing renewable energy measures (REM) for the Fire Academy Complex utilizing renewable technologies and concluded that there is potential for solar energy generation. Solar Generation Solar energy produces clean energy and reduces a building’s carbon footprint. This is accomplished via photovoltaic panels which are mounted on all south and southwestern facades of the building. Flat roof, as well as sloped areas can be utilized; flat areas will have the panels turned to an optimum solar absorbing angle. (A structural survey of the roof would be necessary before the installation of PV panels is considered). The state of NJ has instituted a program in which one Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) is given to the Owner for every 1000 kWh of generation. SREC’s can be sold anytime on the market at their current market value. The value of the credit varies upon the current need of the power companies. The average value per credit is around $152, this value was used in our financial calculations. This equates to $0.152 per kWh generated. CEG has reviewed the existing roof, ground, and parking lot area potential of the complex for the purposes of determining a potential for a photovoltaic system. The complex was evaluated for the most economical and feasible areas for the installation of a solar array, which included a parking lot array, and roof mounted array. A depiction of the area utilized at the facility is shown in Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. Note this analysis did not include a structural evaluation to determine if the roof could accommodate the additional loading, which would be required to be performed prior to implementation. The total KWH production for the system is 508,811 kWh annually, reducing the overall utility bill for the complex by approximately 26% percent. A detailed financial analysis can be found in the Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. This analysis illustrates the payback of the system over a 25 year period. The eventual degradation of the solar panels and the price of accumulated SREC’s are factored into the payback. The proposed photovoltaic array layout is designed based on the specifications for the Sharp Model ND-240QCJ panel. This panel has a “DC” rated full load output of 240 watts, and has a total panel conversion efficiency of 14.4%. Although panels rated at higher wattages are available through Sharp and other various manufacturers, in general most manufacturers who produce commercially available solar panels produce a similar panel in the 200 to 250 watt range. This provides more manufacturer options to the District if they wish to pursue the proposed solar recommendation without losing significant system capacity.



The array system capacity was sized based on available roof space, ground area, or parking canopy style system area available at the existing complex. Estimated solar array generation is calculated based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1.0 Calculator. In order to calculate the array generation an appropriate location with solar data on file must be selected. In addition the system DC rated kilowatt (kW) capacity must be inputted, a DC to AC de-rate factor, panel tilt angle, and array azimuth angle. The DC to AC de-rate factor is based on the panel nameplate DC rating, inverter and transformer efficiencies (95%), mismatch factor (98%), diodes and connections (100%), dc and ac wiring(98%, 99%), soiling, (95%), system availability (95%), shading (if applicable), and age(new/100%). The overall DC to AC de-rate factor has been calculated at an overall rating of 86%. The PVWatts Calculator program then calculates estimated system generation based on average monthly solar irradiance and user provided inputs. The monthly energy generation and offset electric costs from the PVWatts calculator is shown in the Renewable/Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. The proposed solar arrays for the complex are qualified by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Net Metering Guidelines as a Class I Renewable Energy Source. These guidelines allow onsite customer generation using renewable energy sources such as solar and wind with a capacity of 2 megawatts (MW) or less. This limits a customer system design capacity to being a net user and not a net generator of electricity on an annual basis. Although these guidelines state that if a customer does not generate (produce more electricity than they use), the customer will be credited those kilowatt-hours generated to be carried over for future usage on a month to month basis. Then, on an annual basis if the customer is a net generator the customer will then be compensated by the utility the average annual PJM Grid LMP price per kilowatt-hour for the over generation. Due to the aforementioned legislation, the customer is at limited risk if they generate more than they use at times throughout the year. With the inefficiency of today’s energy storage systems, such as batteries, the added cost of storage systems is not warranted and was not considered in the proposed design. Direct purchase involves the District paying for 100% of the total project cost upfront in lieu of one of the methods noted in the Installation Funding Options section below. Calculations include a utility inflation rate as well as the degradation of the solar panels over time. The financial summary for the complex is as follows:



Concord Engineering recommends that the District review all options available for installation of solar PV systems at the Educational Complex including a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). This option utilizes providers who will own, operate, and maintain the system for a period of 15 years. During this time the PPA Provider would sell all of the electric generated by Solar Array to the District at a reduced rate compared to their existing electric rate. It should be noted that current SREC pricing has significantly impacted the PPA market in addition to the end of the 30% grant in lieu of the investment tax credit. These recent market changes have made it more difficult for entities to secure low cost power purchase price options.

Installation Cost ($): $1,827,549


Net Installation Cost ($): $1,827,549

SREC Revenue ($/Yr): $77,087




Simple Payback 12.3


Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $1,156,301

Simple Lifetime Savings $2,224,811

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 2.6%


REM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY



Wind Generation

In addition to the Solar Analysis, CEG also conducted a review of the applicability of wind energy for the facility. Wind energy production is another option available through the Renewable Energy Incentive Program. Wind turbines of various types can be utilized to produce clean energy on a per building basis. Cash incentives are available per kWh of electric usage. CEG investigated the potential for smaller building mountable wind turbines, and horizontal turbines to maximize the available free space. In order to be economically viable a site requires a minimum average speed of 6 meters per second (13.5 mph). Based on the obtained wind data shown in Figure 3 for Ventnor City, NJ the annual average wind speed is 9.8 mph with a peak of 11.9 mph, making this area unattractive for wind development. While the wind data set provides a lower expectation of power production capability it is likely given the proximity to the coastline wind speeds are suspected to be higher than the data set presents from the onshore weather station and given the success of close by wind installations, such as the Atlantic County Utilities Authority investment in the technology could be warranted. However, given the school’s proximity to residential neighbor hoods, limited land space, and coastal onshore regulation of wind development, significant vetting would be necessary and costly to the district without guarantees of ever installing a system. Therefore, wind energy is not recommend at this juncture.

Figure 3

Ventnor City, New Jersey Average Wind Speeds



IX. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY Load Profile: Load Profile analysis was performed to determine the seasonal energy usage of the facility. Irregularities in the load profile will indicate potential problems within the facility. Consequently based on the profile a recommendation will be made to remedy the irregularity in energy usage. For this report, the facilities energy consumption data was gathered in table format and plotted in graph form to create the load profile. Refer to The Electric and Natural Gas Usage Profiles included within this report to reference the respective electricity and natural gas usage load profiles. Electricity: The electricity usage profile demonstrates a summer cooling dominated load profile from winter to summer. The average summer (May-September) demand is 43% more than the average winter (October-April) demand and the consumption profile follows a similar pattern with a 33% increase. The following table outlines the seasonal average monthly consumption and demand for the facility.

The historical usage profile is less than favorable as typically winter commodity rates are lower due to reduced demand on the grid, compared with summer. Third Party Supplier (TPS) electric commodity contracts that offer a firm, fixed price for 100% of the facilities electric requirements and are lower than the ACE’s BGS-FP default rate are recommended. Natural Gas: The Natural Gas Usage Profile demonstrates a heating load dominated profile, with significant consumption drop off during the summer months. The table below shows the monthly average consumption for gas during the winter and summer seasons.

KWH PER MONTH

KW PER MONTH

Summer (May to September) 178,904 536Winter (October to April) 134,460 374

Avg. Load Increase Winter to Summer 33.1% 43.4%

ELECTRIC UTILITY SEASONAL LOAD PROFILE

DESCRIPTIONSEASONAL AVERAGES



This load profile will yield less than favorable natural gas prices due to the heating dominated profile. Higher winter month consumption will yield higher pricing which will not be offset by the summer month consumption. Nymex commodity pricing is generally higher in the winter months of November – March and lower in the summer months of April – October. Tariff Analysis: Electricity: The facility receives electrical service from Atlantic City Electric (ACE) under commercial rate classifications Annual General Service Secondary (AGS). The facility has contracted a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to provide electric commodity service. First Energy Solutions has been contracted however; the contract particulars such as product structure, price, term and conditions were not available for review or comments. For electric supply (generation) service, the client has a choice to either use ACE’s default service rate BGS or contract with a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to supply electricity. Each year since 2002, the four New Jersey Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs) - Public Service Gas & Electric Company (PSE&G), Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE), Jersey Central Power & Light Company (JCP&L), and Rockland Electric Company (RECO) - have procured several billion dollars of electric supply to serve their Basic Generation Service (BGS) customers through a statewide auction process held in February. BGS refers to the service of customers who are not served by a third party supplier or competitive retailer. This service is sometimes known as Standard Offer Service, Default Service, or Provider of Last Resort Service. The Auction Process has consisted of two auctions that are held concurrently, one for larger customers on an hourly price plan (BGS-CIEP) and one for smaller commercial and residential customers on a fixed-price plan (BGS-FP). This facility’s rate structure is based on the fixed-price plan (BGS-FP). The utility will continue to be responsible for maintaining the existing network of wires, pipes and poles that make up the delivery system, which will serve all consumers, regardless of whom they choose to purchase their electricity or natural gas from. ACE’s delivery service rate includes the following charges: Customer Service Charge, Distribution Charge (kWh and Demand), Societal Benefits Charge (SBC), and Securitization Transition Charge.

THERM PER MONTH

Summer (May to September) 650.2Winter (October to April) 9,444.8

Avg. Load Increase Summer to Winter 93.1%

NATURAL GAS UTILITY SEASONAL LOAD PROFILE

DESCRIPTIONSEASONAL AVERAGES



Natural Gas: The facility currently receives natural gas distribution service from South Jersey Gas under rate schedule General Service Gas. The facility has not contracted with a Third Party Supplier (TPS). For natural gas supply service, the client has a choice to either use the utility’s default service rate BGSS or contract with a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to supply natural gas commodity service. The utility provides basic gas supply service (BGSS) to customers who choose not to shop from a Third Party Supplier (TPS) for natural gas commodity. The option is essential to protect the reliability of service to consumers as well as protecting consumers if a third party supplier defaults or fails to provide commodity service. The utilities are responsible for maintaining the existing network of wires, pipes and poles that make up the delivery system, which will serve all consumers, regardless of whom they choose to purchase their electricity or natural gas from the utility’s delivery service rate includes the following charges: Customer Service Charge, Distribution Charge, & Societal Benefits Charge (SBC).

Electric and Natural Gas Commodities Market Overview:

In our region, electricity is produced by natural gas, nuclear, coal and renewables. Much of the recent electricity price fluctuations can be attributed to the spot natural gas pricing variations on generation that produces electricity and the retirement of coal plants that result in increased production demand from other sources of generation.

It is important to note that both natural gas and electric commodity market prices are moved by supply and demand, political conditions, market technicals and trader sentiment. The market is continuously changing Energy commodity pricing is also correlated to weather forecasts. Because weather forecasts are dependable only in the short-term, prolonged temperature extremes can really cause extreme price swings.

Short Term Energy Outlook - US Energy Information Administration (June 2015):

U.S. Natural Gas Prices. Natural gas spot prices averaged $2.78/MMBtu at the Henry Hub in June, a decrease of $0.07/MMBtu from May. The monthly average natural gas price is expected to reamain lower than $3/MMBtu, and will remain below $4/MMBtu throughout the forecast period. Projected Henry Hub natural gas price averages $2.97/MMBtu in 2015 and $3.31/MMBtu in 2016.

Natural gas futures prices for October 2015 delivery (for the five-day period ending July 1, 2015) averaged $2.85/MMBtu. Current options and futures prices imply that market participants place the lower and upper bounds for the 95% confidence interval for September 2015 contracts at around $1.79/MMBtu and $4.03/MMBtu, respectively.



U.S. Electricity Retail Prices. EIA expects the U.S. residential price of electricity to raise an average 2.5% more than in 2014, with pricing in June 2015 of 13.264 cents per kilowatt-hour. Residential electricity prices are expected to increase 2.4% during 2016.

U.S. Petroleum Product Prices. EIA expected even with the recent cold weather that heating oil prices will be lower than last winter, due to lower projected crude oil prices compared to last winter. Compared to last winter retail heating oil prices are expected to average $3.00/Gal this winter.



Contracting with Third Party Suppliers and BGS Bidding Options Cooperative Purchasing: Cooperative Purchasing agreements allow multiple parties to come together under the premise of using purchasing power in order to reduce the price for goods and services. In this instance the Cooperative is under the unified goal of reducing energy prices for its members. As such members of the cooperative pool their respective energy consumption together into a single bid to obtain low cost energy pricing. Many Cooperatives have a formal bidding process and insure all suppliers provide the required documentation and paperwork necessary per New Jersey Administrative Code and Procurement Law. In addition, a Master Agreement is incorporated into the bid specifications with terms and conditions for the energy supply award protecting Local Government Entities. Concord does not recommend signing any Third Party Supplier contract or agreement unless it has been heavily vetted by an attorney that understands commodity law and regulation. Many government clients that have signed third party supplier contracts are now experiencing regulatory pass-thru charges due to vague or inadvertently agreed terms and conditions. Important information can be found on DCA’s website regarding Cooperative Purchasing. Please visit web link: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lpcl_docs/Procuring_Power_Supply_through_a_Cooperative_Purchasing_System.pdf

It is important with any commodity procurement undertaking that you incorporate a rational, defensible strategy for purchasing commodity in volatile markets based upon the following:

Budgets that reflect sound market intelligence An understanding of historical prices and trends Awareness of seasonal opportunities (e.g. shoulder months) Negotiation of fair contractual terms An aggressive, market based price

Bidding Practices and Processes:

Different bid processes and methodologies can create different objectives, but transparency is always a primary goal. Closed bid competitive purchase RFBs, online bid receipt or online reverse auctions can be utilized. Firms which can provide online bidding and reverse auctions are approved by the New Jersey Division of Local Government Services pursuant to the Local Unit Electronic Technology Program, (P.L.2001, c. 30). Approved firms can be found on the website at: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lpcl.html. The Board of Public Utilities also offers a list of energy suppliers available for each service territory that can be found on the website at: http://www.bpu.state.nj.us/bpu/commercial/shopping.html#nbr1 Over the last decade, Concord Engineering has been involved with numerous approaches to bidding including the Traditional Sealed Bid format and Online Reverse Auction methods. In our experience, Online Reverse Auctions do not always produce optimum results for retail



commodity purchases. The procurement consultant with the Client should determine a bidding practice that will yield optimum results and create a robust competitive environment. Many factors will come into consideration to determine whether the Online Bidding and/or Reverse Auction method is appropriate. Factors such as annual consumption, number and complexity of accounts, potential supplier participation as well as rate tariffs must be taken into consideration. LGE’s Purchasing Options:

Per DCA’s paper entitled “Taking Advantage of Lower Electric Rates for your Government Agency” they state, “First, it is important to emphasize that procurement of power supply must be consistent with the Local Public Contracts Law (LPCL) or for boards of education, the Public School Contracts Law (PSCL). Bottom line: When the estimated amount of spending for power supply is above the contracting unit’s bid threshold, power supply must be publicly bid or purchased subject to an exception to the bid law. “Full text can be found via web link: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lpcl_docs/Taking_Advantage_of_Lower_Electric_Rates_for_your_Government_Agency.pdf

1. Cooperative Purchasing

“When local governments put aside provincial interests in exchange for the broader benefits to be achieved through Cooperative Purchasing, they can secure the provision and performance of goods and services at a lower cost. Cooperative Purchasing has demonstrated a strong ability to serve as an effective tool to assist local officials save taxpayer dollars. Cooperative Purchasing represents viable alternatives to the conventional “go-it-alone” bidding process. “ Many Cooperatives in the state utilize online bidding to secure attractive electricity and natural gas supply service. Utilizing a Cooperative is highly recommended. Benefits can include:

• Increase staff effectiveness • Reduce duplication of bidding and contract processing • Reduce time, effort and costs associated with developing and managing the bid process • Leverage established and large volume pricing of contracted products • Great alternative contract option to save time, money and ensure quality products &

services

2. Online Reverse Auctions and Online Sealed Bids

“For local government entities, the requirement to bid does not mean the solicitation of quotes; it means a formal process where there is a bid specification, notice to bidders, and a level playing field for all potential bidders. The Division’s E-Procurement Pilot program (authorized under P.L. 2001, c. 30) allows local units to purchase commodities and services, including energy supply, through online bidding and reverse auctions programs approved by the Division. Any online organization participating in the online pilot program must be approved by the Division. Once the Division has approved an online service, any local unit can take advantage of the service. When conducted through an online service, however, the local unit is responsible to



ensure that the online service is operating consistent with procurement laws for an individual procurement.”

Both online reverse auctions and online sealed bids can produce significant cost savings results. The process is transparent and seamless. Many platforms are very flexible allowing for full customization to meet the Client’s needs.

All providers of online reverse auction and online bidding charge a fee indirectly to LGE’s. The fee is included in the bid pricing shown by suppliers as a $/kWh or $/therm charge and paid directly by the supplier to the vendor. Although LGE’s do not have to formally bid for this type of service should they utilize a DCA pre-approved vendor, we would recommend that any and all fees paid by the supplier to the vendor be disclosed prior to any engagement of services. An overview of both the Online Reverse Auction vs Sealed bid format was published in the NJBIZ Spring of 2007. To view this article, please go to web link: http://www.nbizmag.com/magarticles/sealedbidvsreverseauction.pdf Benefits can include:

• Provides full transparency during the procurement process with unbiased decision making

• Drives prices down through real-time competition • Allows client to actively participate during the entire auction or online bidding process • Execution of contracts are completed within hours of the auction’s close • Places the focus for suppliers solely on price, since all other factors and related

contracting documentation is received and pre-qualified before the final auction bid due date

• Full audit and archival capabilities to substantiate award decisions • Improves knowledge capture, transfer and re-use capabilities

3. Traditional Sealed Bid Format

This type of bid format is not endorsed by the Division of Local Government Services for the bidding of power supply. However, in a recent review of bidding methodologies and which methodology would likely to produce lower cost results, a NJ Government Agency allowed suppliers to choose the bidding format. The bidding options allowed were either via an Online Reverse Auction or via a Traditional Sealed Bid. The Agency understood that many suppliers will not participate in an online auction format or methodology and wanted to allow all NJBPU suppliers to participate. The Agency is the 2nd largest Cooperative in the state which includes participants from five Counties and over 200 municipalities. After the online reverse auction bid was closed and the traditional sealed bids opened and reviewed, the Agency awarded the electricity contract to a bidder that was the lowest price and submitted their bid via the Traditional Sealed Bid Format.



The below recommendations presented by Concord Engineering are based on current information provided by the owner for their facilities historical energy usage. Any savings presented with these recommendations are estimates only based on that information. It is recommended that further analysis and review of more recent utility data and actual TPS electricity and natural gas supply contracts and historical billings be performed prior to performing any of the presented recommendations. Recommendations: 1. Concord recommends the owner continue its aggregation approach for 3rd party commodity

supply procurement strategies for the purchase of electricity. Aggregating the usage of all facilities for electricity, allows the owner to continue to achieve lower prices in commodity supply costs over the utility default service programs. Energy commodities are among the most volatile of all commodities, however at this point and time, energy is extremely competitive and contract terms longer than 12 months are desirable. Contracts due to expire in the near term would continue to yield very favorable pricing. It is important to aggregate usage where available and take advantage of these current market prices quickly, before energy increases.

2. After review of the utility consumption report and current commodity pricing outlook, Concord recommends that the owner utilize the advisement of a 3rd party unbiased Energy Consulting Firm licensed by the State of New Jersey Board of Public Utilities that is experienced in the procurement of commodities, New Jersey procurement laws, aggregation of facilities and energy supply risk and commodity management. This firm should be able to provide full service advisement over the term of the contract, provide market watch opportunities and identify any additional opportunities that may further reduce costs. Many of these opportunities may include: energy rates; utility bill auditing; energy data analytics; and efficiency improvements. It is important that a rational, defensible strategy for purchasing commodity in volatile markets is incorporated. Examples include:

Budgets that reflect sound market intelligence An understanding of utility and market historical prices and trends Awareness of seasonal opportunities (e.g. shoulder months) Negotiation of fair contractual terms An aggressive, market based price

3. Concord also recommends that the owner consider utilizing a third party utility billing-

auditing service to further analyze historical utility invoices such as water, sewer, natural gas, electricity and fuel oil for incorrect billings and rate tariff optimization services. This service can be based on a shared savings model with no direct cost. The service could provide refunds on potential incorrect billings that may have been passed through by the utilities and paid by the owner.



PJM Demand Response Programs Demand response programs may not fit or be applicable to all clients, however if there is an opportunity to shed load, typically above 100 kilowatts, while not having significant impacts on operations and comfort conditions it could warrant consideration. Concord recommends the owner review the program description below from PJM to see if there is a potential fit, as it can become a substantial revenue source dependent on your ability to curtail. What is PJM? PJM Interconnection is a regional transmission organization that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity in all parts of 13 states and the District of Columbia. As an independent party, PJM operates a competitive wholesale electricity market and manages the high-voltage electricity grid to ensure reliability for more than 51 million people. PJM’s long-term planning process take a broad, interstate perspective that identifies the most effective and cost efficient improvements to the grid to ensure reliability and economic benefits on the system as a whole. PJM’s “Wholesale” market is focused on entities that buy and sell the electricity, but are not the end consumers of the electricity. The retail market is focused on entities that buy electricity from the wholesale market or produce the electricity, and then sell the electricity to a customer that physically consumes it. PJM does not interact directly with the electricity consumers, but with the companies (or Utility) that provides the electricity to consumers. What is Demand Response? Demand Response is a consumer’s ability to reduce electricity consumption at their location when wholesale prices are high or the reliability of the electric grid is threatened. Common examples of demand response include: raising the temperature of the thermostat so the air conditioner does not run as frequently, slowing down or stopping production at an industrial operation or dimming/shutting off lights, basically any explicit action taken to reduce load in response to short-term high prices or a signal from PJM. Demand Response does not include the reduction of electricity consumption based on normal operating practice or behavior. For example, if a company’s normal schedule is to close for a holiday, the reduction of electricity due to this closure or scaled-back operation is not considered a demand response activity in most situations. Retail Customer Program Offerings: PJM’s demand response opportunities enables retail electricity consumers to earn a revenue stream for reducing electricity consumption when either wholesale prices are high or the reliability of the electric grid is threatened. Demand response participation is broken in two broad classifications, Economic and Emergency. An electricity consumer may participate in either or both depending on the circumstances.



Emergency Demand Response primarily represents a mandatory commitment to reduce load or only consume electricity up to a certain level when PJM needs assistance to maintain reliability under supply shortage or expected emergency operation conditions. This is considered a mandatory commitment to which penalties will be applied for non-compliance. The consumer’s resources must be available to respond to PJM’s request to reduce load where the availability depends on the product selected, as follows: Limited DR – resource is available for up to 10 weekdays from June through September,

where each request may be up to six hours in duration. Extended Summer DR – resources is available for all days from May through October,

where each request may be up to ten hours in duration Annual DR - resources is available for all days from June through May of following year,

where each request may be up to ten hours in duration PJM considers these resources similar to a generator and fully expects them to perform at the time when the grid most needs it to avoid brownouts and/or rolling blackouts within the PJM service territory. The revenue stream derived from participation is largely driven by the “Capacity” market as defined under the Reliability Pricing Model (RPM). The revenue earned is a function of the relevant RPM price and the load reduction commitment. The resource is paid to be “available” during expected emergency conditions on a monthly basis for a commitment that is made for one year, which starts on June 1 and ends on May 31 of the following year. Emergency demand response also has the opportunity to participate on a voluntary basis. Under this option, the resources have the option to participate when an emergency is called and will be compensated based on the amount of energy reduced during the emergency. Such resources will not receive revenue from the capacity market. Economic Demand Response primarily represents a voluntary commitment to reduce load in the energy market when the wholesale price is higher than the published monthly PJM net benefits price. The net benefit price represents the price at which the benefits incurred by a reduction in wholesale prices from the economic demand response will exceed the cost to pay for the economic demand response. The economic demand response will be used to displace a generation resource and PJM expect the resource to perform and will assess deviation charges if the amount of load reductions realized is significantly different than the amount of load reductions dispatched by PJM. An economic demand response resource may also provide Ancillary Services to the wholesale market with the appropriate infrastructure and qualification by PJM. There are three Ancillary Services markets in which economic demand response resources may participate: Synchronized Reserves (the ability to reduce electricity consumption within 10 minutes of PJM dispatch), Day Ahead Scheduling Reserves (the ability to reduce electricity consumption within 30 minutes of



PJM dispatch) and Regulation (the ability to follow PJM’s regulation and frequency response signal). Participation in the market is voluntary; however, if a resource clears, performance is mandatory. How to Participate? The first step for a consumer interested in demand response is to contact a Curtailment Service Provider(s) to get a more in-depth understanding of the opportunities and determine whether you have the capability to participate. A list of Curtailment Service Providers is available on PJM’s Web site at Markets & Operations > Demand Response > Curtailment Service Providers (www.pjm.com/markets-and-operations/demand-response/csps.aspx). The list includes contact names at the firms; it also indicates in what states the firms do business. PJM also posts on its website the training materials developed for its members who are interested in the rules and requirements for demand response activity at http://www.pjm.com/training/training-material.aspx, along with a variety of demand response information at http://www.pjm.com/markets-and-operations/demand-response.aspx.



X. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS CEG has reviewed various funding options for the District to utilize in subsidizing the costs for installing the energy conservation measures noted within this report. Below are a few alternative funding methods: A. Incentive Programs: Pay For Performance (www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/pay-performance) The New Jersey Smart Start Pay for Performance Program includes incentives based on savings resulted from implemented ECMs. The program is available for all buildings that were audited as part of the NJ Clean Energy’s Local Government Energy Audit Program. The facility’s participation in the program is assisted by an approved program partner. An “Energy Reduction Plan” is created with the facility and approved partner to shown at least 15% reduction in the building’s current energy use. Multiple energy conservation measures implemented together are applicable toward the total savings of at least 15%. No more than 50% of the total energy savings can result from lighting upgrades / changes. Total incentive is capped at 50% of the project cost. The program savings is broken down into three benchmarks; Energy Reduction Plan, Project Implementation, and Measurement and Verification. Each step provides additional incentives as the energy reduction project continues. The benchmark incentives are as follows:

1. Energy Reduction Plan – Upon completion of an energy reduction plan by an approved program partner, the incentive will grant $0.10 per square foot between $5,000 and $50,000, and not to exceed 50% of the facility’s annual energy expense. (Benchmark #1 is capped at 50% of this value if the entity has completed a local government energy audit.)

2. Project Implementation – Upon installation of the recommended measures along with the “Substantial Completion Construction Report,” the incentive will grant savings per KWH or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum saving must be 15%. (Example $0.11 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.12/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $1.10 / Therm for 15% savings, $1.20 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from projected savings above 15%.

3. Measurement and Verification – Upon verification 12 months after implementation of all recommended measures, that actual savings have been achieved, based on a completed verification report, the incentive will grant additional savings per kWh or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum savings must be 15%. (Example $0.07 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.08/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $0.70 / Therm for 15% savings, $0.80 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from verified savings above 15%.



Disclaimer: The Pay for Performance incentives stated above has been estimated based on the current calculated energy savings for the measures outlined in the report, and shown in Facility Project Summary Table. Qualification for the program has been based on meeting the minimum demand threshold of 100 kilowatts and overall project meeting the minimum 15% source energy reduction requirement. This preliminary qualification analysis does not guarantee program incentives or acceptance into the program. The owner will be required to retain a Program Partner and formally apply to the program to determine final project incentives.

Direct Install Program (www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/direct-install) The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Direct Install Program is a state funded program that targets small commercial and industrial facilities with peak demand of less than 200 kW. This turnkey program is aimed at providing owners a seamless, comprehensive process for analysis, equipment replacement and financial incentives to reduce consumption, lower utility costs and improve profitability. The program covers up to 70% of the cost for eligible upgrades including lighting, lighting controls, refrigeration, HVAC, motors, variable speed drives, natural gas and food service. Participating contractors (refer to www.njcleanenergy.com) conduct energy assessments in addition to your standard local government energy audit and install the cost-effective measures. The Educational Complex does not qualify for the Direct Install Program based on current program criteria. Smart Start Program (www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/nj-smartstart-buildings/nj-smartstart-buildings) Prescriptive Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include unit pricing incentives for installation of energy efficient equipment and controls. Proposed equipment and controls must meet the minimum efficiency requirements as well as other application requirements. The Smart Start prescriptive incentives applicable for new construction, renovations, remodeling and equipment replacements, for a wide range of equipment including:

Electric Chillers Gas Cooling Electric Unitary HVAC Ground Source Heat Pumps Gas Heating Variable Frequency Drives Gas Water Heating Premium Motors Prescriptive Lighting Lighting Controls



Technical Studies Custom Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include all measures not identified in the prescriptive measures category or measures that must have savings verified through additional analysis such as energy model simulations. Custom measures are intended to include savings as a result of unique energy efficiency measures, which are typically facility specific such as waste heat recovery. Custom incentives are provided based on the amount of energy saved and minimum internal rate of return in order to be eligible. B. Financing Options: The following section outlines various funding mechanisms available to fund energy efficiency projects. It is the local government unit’s responsibility to verify these funding sources adhere to all required federal, state, and local finance laws. Municipal Bonds Municipal bonds are a bond issued by a city or other local government, or their agencies. Potential issuers of municipal bonds include cities, counties, redevelopment agencies, school districts, publicly owned airports and seaports, and any other governmental entity (or group of governments) below the state level. Municipal bonds may be general obligations of the issuer or secured by specified revenues. Interest income received by holders of municipal bonds is often exempt from the federal income tax and from the income tax of the state in which they are issued, although municipal bonds issued for certain purposes may not be tax exempt. Municipal Lease Purchase (Long-term Municipal Lease Agreements) A Municipal Lease is a contract that has many of the characteristics of a standard commercial lease, with three primary differences. In a Municipal Lease, the intent of the lessee is to purchase and take title to the equipment. The financing is a full payout contract with no significant residual or balloon payments at the end of the lease term. The lease payments include the return of principal and interest, with the interest being exempt from Federal income taxation to the recipient. Typically, a tax-exempt interest transaction will be financed at interest rates lower than equivalent commercial financing. The Municipal Lease provides for termination for non-appropriation of funds by the Government Agency. A Municipal Lease offers several advantages over alternative methods of financing such as simplicity, speed of delivery, non-appropriation, buyout terms, and cost. Under most state statutes, municipal contracts with terms of over one year require significant investments in time and money in order to comply with municipal debt restrictions. Since a Municipal Lease is, in effect, a year-to-year obligation, many of these requirements do not apply. The ease of executing a Municipal Lease minimizes the elapsed time and the expenses associated with issuing any kind of certificate of indebtedness or bond. Lease to Own (Leaseback)



A lease to own arrangement is where the seller of an asset (i.e. building, equipment, etc.) leases back the same asset from the purchaser. In a leaseback arrangement, the specifics of the arrangement are made immediately after the sale of the asset, with the amount of the payments and the time period specified. Essentially, the seller of the asset becomes the lessee and the purchaser becomes the lessor in this arrangement. A leaseback arrangement is useful when entities need to un-tie the cash invested in an asset for other investments, but the asset is still needed in order to operate. Leaseback deals can also provide the seller with additional tax deductions. The lessor benefits in that they will receive stable payments for a specified period of time. Power Purchase Agreement Public Law 2008, Chapter 3 authorizes contracts of up to fifteen (15) years for energy purchase contracts commonly known as “power purchase agreements.” These are programs where the contracting unit (Owner) procures a contract for, in most cases, a third party to install, maintain, and own a renewable energy system. These renewable energy systems are typically solar panels, windmills or other systems that create renewable energy. In exchange for the third party’s work of installing, maintaining and owning the renewable energy system, the contracting unit (Owner) agrees to purchase the power generated by the renewable energy system from the third party at agreed upon energy rates. On-Bill Financing On-bill financing allows a loan for energy efficiency measures to be repaid over time via an additional line item on the recipient’s utility bill, which decreases repayment risk for the lender. The lender in “classic” utility on-bill financing has traditionally been the utility itself. Hybrid models have also emerged in which public and private funds are pooled to offer low-interest loans, with repayment similarly attached to the utility bill. The utility then collects the payment and returns it to the lender, which lowers the lender’s administrative costs. The utility customer benefits from lower energy costs after retrofits, and typically pays loans back over a period of about 2–5 years. This model has also recently become available with Third Party Commodity Suppliers allowing for energy efficiency project funding to be rolled into their bill for the customer. If the owner is interested in this funding mechanism they should contact their local utility or third party supplier if any such program is offered. Alternatively if the owner’s current third party supply contract is expiring this could be included as an option when bidding for new suppliers. Public-Private Partnerships A public-private partnership is a business relationship between a public entity and a private-sector company for the purpose of completing a project that will serve the public. These types of partnerships can be used to finance, build, and operate various types of projects such as public transportation networks, new buildings, parks, and convention centers. In lieu the traditional path of a public entity funding the project, a private enterprise would fund it in exchange for receiving some type of financial benefit from the project once complete.



Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP): Public Law 2009, Chapter 4 authorizes government entities to make energy related improvements to their facilities and pay for the costs using the value of energy savings that result from the improvements. The “Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP)” law provides a flexible approach that can allow all government agencies in New Jersey to improve and reduce energy usage with minimal expenditure of new financial resources. This program provides public entities to make valuable facility infrastructure improvements that are associated with energy savings. All energy savings projects are eligible as long as the financing period does not extend beyond 15 years. The financing can be utilized for all aspects of energy efficiency project implementation including, energy savings plan development, engineering, construction management, construction management, commissioning, and measurement and verification. This program provides the much needed financing for energy efficiency projects without the burden of increased debt. The program allows for procurement of financing without voter approval or extending existing debt. The program requires evaluation to ensure a positive cash-flow through the entire 15 year financing period. The first phase of implementing an ESIP is the development of an Energy Savings Plan (ESP) to verify the energy savings, construction costs, and overall financial model.



XI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS In addition to the ECMs and REMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide significant energy savings and provide immediate benefit, many of which facility’s staff are already performing. Maintenance items and small operational improvements are typically achievable with on-site staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide substantial operational savings compared to the costs associated. The following are recommendations which should be considered a priority in achieving an energy efficient building.

A. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

B. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output.

C. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better Indoor Air Quality (IAQ).

D. Shutdown all non-essential equipment during unoccupied periods.

E. Verify all occupied / unoccupied schedules are being fully utilized to setback space temperature and shut outdoor air dampers.



XII. ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS The assumptions utilized in this energy audit include but are not limited to following:

A. Cost Estimates noted within this report are based on industry accepted costing data such as RS MeansTM Cost Data, contractor pricing and engineering estimates. All cost estimates for this level of auditing are +/- 20%. Prevailing wage rates for the specified region has been utilized to calculate installation costs. The cost estimates indicated within this audit should be utilized by the owner for prioritizing further project development post the energy audit. Project development would include investment grade auditing and detailed engineering.

B. Energy savings noted within this audit are calculated utilizing industry standard procedures and accepted engineering assumptions. For this level of auditing, energy savings are not guaranteed.

C. Information gathering for each facility is strongly based on interviews with operations personnel. Information dependent on verbal feedback is used for calculation assumptions including but not limited to the Operating Hours, Equipment Type, Control Strategies, and Scheduling.

D. Information contained within the major equipment list is based on the existing owner documentation where available (drawings, O&M manuals, etc.). If existing owner documentation is not available, catalog information is utilized to populate the required information.

E. Equipment incentives and energy credits are based on current pricing and status of rebate programs. Rebate availability is dependent on the individual program funding and applicability. It is the owner’s responsibility to ensure installed measure equipment meets NJOCE program rules and requirements to receive incentives.

F. Equipment (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, & Lighting) noted within an ECM recommendation is strictly noted as a basis for calculation of energy savings. The owner should use this equipment information as a benchmark when pursuing further investment grade project development and detailed engineering for specific energy conservation measures.

G. Utility bill annual averages are utilized for calculation of all energy costs unless otherwise noted. Accuracy of the utility energy usage and costs are based on the information provided. Utility information including usage and costs is estimated where incomplete data is provided.

H. Greenhouse Gas Emissions are calculated for each ECM, the basis for these emissions reductions are NJCEP published standard emissions factors, which are the following:.

a. Electric Savings: 1. CO2: 1.52 lbs/kWh 2. NOX: 0.0028 lbs/kWh 3. SO2: 0.0065 lbs/kWh

b. Natural Gas Savings: 1. CO2: 11.7 lbs/therm 2. NOX: 0.0092 lbs/therm

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK INTERNAL RATE OF

RETURN (IRR)NET PRESENT VALUE

(NPV)

MATERIAL LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) (Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Rooftop Unit Replacement $305,000 $300,000 $13,742 $591,258 $3,921 $0 $3,921 15 $58,815 $0 -90.1% 150.8 -20.65% ($544,449.36)

ECM #2 Vending Miser Controls $500 $300 $0 $800 $622 $0 $622 15 $9,334 $0 1066.7% 1.3 77.77% $6,628.26

ECM #3 High Efficiency Transformers $42,000 $5,000 $0 $47,000 $5,082 $0 $5,082 20 $101,640 $0 116.3% 9.2 8.82% $28,607.33

ECM #4 Plug Load Controllers $11,000 $4,600 $0 $15,600 $2,551 $0 $2,551 15 $38,265 $0 145.3% 6.1 14.09% $14,853.67

ECM #5 Central DDC System Expansion $304,800 $152,400 $0 $457,200 $9,429 $0 $9,429 20 $188,580 $0 -58.8% 48.5 -7.27% ($316,920.29)

ECM #6 Refrigerator Replacement $2,060 $0 $0 $2,060 $115 $0 $115 15 $1,725 $0 -16.3% 17.9 -2.14% ($687.14)

ECM #7 Water Conservation $19,000 $4,000 $0 $23,000 $720 $0 $720 15 $10,800 $0 -53.0% 31.9 -8.24% ($14,404.69)

ECM #8 EC Motors $3,000 $2,100 $0 $5,100 $105 $0 $105 15 $1,575 $0 -69.1% 48.6 -12.04% ($3,846.52)

ECM #9 Walk-In Freezer Fan Controllers $1,800 $300 $150 $1,950 $240 $0 $240 15 $3,600 $0 84.6% 8.1 8.87% $915.10

ECM #10 NEMA Premium Efficiency Motors $1,900 $1,150 $0 $3,050 $91 $0 $91 15 $1,365 $0 -55.2% 33.5 -8.70% ($1,963.65)

ECM #11 Split Condensing Unit Replacement $97,000 $150,000 $5,068 $241,932 $2,402 $0 $2,402 15 $36,030 $0 -85.1% 100.7 -17.80% ($213,257.08)

ECM #12 Interior Lighting Upgrade $147,318 $99,720 $23,320 $223,718 $29,637 $0 $29,637 15 $444,555 $0 98.7% 7.5 10.13% $130,086.58

ECM #13 Exterior Lighting Upgrade $29,850 $13,150 $6,900 $36,100 $4,609 $0 $4,609 15 $69,135 $0 91.5% 7.8 9% $18,921.94

REM #1 400 kW Solar Array $1,096,529 $731,020 $0 $1,827,549 $71,234 $77,087 $148,321 15 $2,224,811 $1,156,301 21.7% 12.3 2.57% ($56,905.80)

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWNCONCORD ENGINEERING

Ventnor City School District - Ventnor City Educational Complex

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGSECM

LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY



APPENDIX B

Appendix B Page 1 of 6

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, further details including how to apply, forms, and calculated incentive values can be found the Clean Energy Website. (www.njcleanenergy.com)

Electric Chillers

Water-Cooled Chillers

Constant Speed: Base: $8 - $30 per ton

Performance Add: $2 - $2.25 per ton Variable Speed:

Base: $12 - $44 per ton Performance Add: $2 - $4.00 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers

Constant Speed: Base: $20 per ton

Performance Add: $3.50 per ton Variable Speed:

Base: $90 - $92 per ton Performance Add: $4.00 per ton

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers (Indirect & Direct-Fired) $185 - $450 per ton

Desiccant Systems

$1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton

Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton

Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton

Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

A/C Economizing Controls < 5 tons $85/unit; >5 tons $170/unit Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007


Gas Heating

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH

Non-Condensing: $0.95 per MBH,

Minimum $400 per unit Condensing:

$2.00 per MBH, Minimum $1000 per unit

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH

Non-Condensing: $1.75 per MBH

Condensing: $2.20 per MBH

Minimum $1000 per unit

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers >1500 - ≤ 2500 MBH



Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers >2500 - ≤ 4000 MBH



Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers < 300 MBH


Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers ≥ 300 – 1500 MBH $1.20 per MBH

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers > 1500 – 2500 MBH $1.20 per MBH

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers > 2500 – 4000 MBH $1.00 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft < 300 MBH


Steam, Natural Draft ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.00 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft >1500 - ≤ 2500 MBH $0.90 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft >2500 - ≤ 4000 MBH $0.70 per MBH

All Types Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH

(Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 95%

Boiler Economizing Controls $1,200 - $2,700

Low Intensity Infrared Heating $300 - $500 per unit

Natural Gas Water Heating Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67

energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit


Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp

Chilled-Water Pumps ≥ 20 hp $60 per VFD rated hp Rotary Screw Air Compressors ≥ 25 hp $5,250 to $12,500 per drive

Centrifugal Fan Applications on Constant Volume HVAC Systems

$80 per VFD rated hp, maximum $6,000 per drive

Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp Boiler Fans > 5 HP $65 to $155 per hp

Boiler Feed Water Pumps > 5 HP $60 to $155 per hp

Commercial Kitchen Hood up to 50 HP Retrofit $55 – $300 per hp New Hood $55 - $250 per hp

Prescriptive Lighting T-8 reduced Wattage

(28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps) Lamp & ballast replacement

$10 per fixture

For retrofit of T-8 fixtures by permanent de-lamping & new reflectors

(Electronic ballast replacement required)

$5 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $25 - $150 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replace with new induction fixture.

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$70 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture


Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED Architectural Floor and Spot Luminaires $50 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs. $150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Linear Ambient Luminaires (Indirect, Indirect/Direct, Direct/Indirect, Direct)

2’ Fixtures - $20/fixture 3’ Fixtures - $30/fixture 4’ Fixtures - $45/fixture 6’ Fixtures - $60/fixture 8’ Fixtures - $75/fixture

LED Linear Replacement Lamps (2’ & 4’ only) $5 per lamp

Luminaires for Ambient Lighting of Interior Commercial Spaces

(1x4, 2x2, 2x4 New Fixtures and Retrofit Kits)

1x4 LED - $15 per fixture 2x2 LED - $15 per fixture 2x4 LED - $25 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area and Roadway Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries $50 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Retrofit Kits for Large Outdoor Pole / Arm-Mounted Area and

Roadway Luminaires $150 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$30 per 4 foot $42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot


LED Stairwell and Passageway Luminaires $40 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures $30 per fixture

LED Wall-Wash Lights $30 per fixture

EnergyStar Commercial Lighting Fixtures $5 to $10 per fixture

EnergyStar Screw and Pine-Based Bulbs $5 to $10 per lamp

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted (Existing Facilities Only) $20 per control

Remote Mounted (Existing Facilities Only) $35 per control

Daylight Dimming Controls $45 per fixture controlled Occupancy Based hi-low Dimming

Control $35 per fixture controlled

Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted High-Bay (Existing Facilities Only) $35 per control

Refrigeration Doors/Covers

Energy-Efficient Doors/Covers for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases $100 per door

Aluminum Night Curtains for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases $3.50 per linear foot

Refrigeration Controls

Door Heater Controls $50 per control Electric Defrost Controls $50 per control Evaporator Fan Controls $75 per control Novelty Cooler Shutoff $50 per control

Refrigerator / Freezer Case Premium Efficiency Motors

Fraction ECM Motor < 1 HP $40 per ECM for replacement of existing shaded-pole motor


Food Service Equipment Combination Oven/Steamer (Electric) $1,000/oven Combination Oven/Steamer (Natural

Gas) $750/oven

Convection Oven (Electric) $350/oven

Convection Oven (Natural Gas) $500/oven

Rack Oven (Natural Gas) $1,000/single oven, $2,000/double oven

Conveyor Oven (Natural Gas) $500/small deck $750/large deck

Fryer (Electric) $200/vat

Fryer (Natural Gas) $749/vat

Large Vat Fryer (Electric) $200/vat

Large Vat Fryer (Natural Gas) $500/vat

Griddle (Electric) $300/griddle

Griddle (Natural Gas) $125/griddle

Steam Cooker (Electric) $1,250/steamer

Steam Cooker (Natural Gas) $2,000/steamer

Insulated Holding Cabinets $200 to $300/unit

Glass Door Refrigerators $75 to $150/unit

Solid Door Refrigerators $50 to $200/unit

Glass Door Freezers $200 to $1,000/unit

Solid Door Freezers $100 to $600/unit

Ice Machines $50 to $500/unit

Dishwashers $400 to $1,500/unit

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000

KWh or 1,500 Therms and an IRR of at least 10%.



APPENDIX C

ENERGY STAR® Statement of EnergyPerformance

9ENERGY STAR®

Score1

Ventnor City Educational Complex

Primary Property Function: K-12 SchoolGross Floor Area (ft²): 152,357Built: 1969

For Year Ending: December 31, 2014Date Generated: July 31, 2015

1. The ENERGY STAR score is a 1-100 assessment of a building’s energy efficiency as compared with similar buildings nationwide, adjusting forclimate and business activity.

Property & Contact Information

Property AddressVentnor City Educational Complex400 N. Lafayette AvenueVentnor, New Jersey 08406

Property OwnerVentnor City School District400 N. Lafayette AvenueVentnor, NJ 08406(____)____-______

Primary ContactTerri Nowotny400 N. Lafayette AvenueVentnor, NJ [email protected]

Property ID: 4495660

Energy Consumption and Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

Site EUI91.6 kBtu/ft²

Annual Energy by FuelElectric - Grid (kBtu) 6,515,225 (47%)Natural Gas (kBtu) 7,438,228 (53%)

National Median ComparisonNational Median Site EUI (kBtu/ft²) 58.9National Median Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) 119.3% Diff from National Median Source EUI 56%

Source EUI185.5 kBtu/ft²

Annual EmissionsGreenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric TonsCO2e/year)

1,267

Signature & Stamp of Verifying Professional

I ___________________ (Name) verify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signature: _______________________Date: ___________

Licensed Professional

Terri Nowotny400 N. Lafayette AvenueVentnor, NJ [email protected]

Professional Engineer Stamp(if applicable)



APPENDIX D

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag RTU-10.2 RTU-9 RTU-19

Unit Type DX/ GAS FURNACE DX/Gas DX/Gas

Qty 1 1 1

Location GYM ROOF ROOF KITCHEN ROOF

Area Served GYM GYM HALLWAY KITCHEN

Manufacturer MCQUAY CARRIER CARRIER

Model No. RAH047CSA 48HJF006---S31NB 48HJF005---631NB

Serial No. FBOU01040077302 1101G20291 11001G24607

Cooling Type Split System DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 120 5 4

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER) 10.1 EER (CU, Est.) 11 EER 11.05 EER

Heating Type Gas Furnace Gas Furnace Gas Furnace

Heating Input (MBH) 417-1250 MBH 150 150

Efficiency - 80% 80%

Supply Fan (HP) 15 - -

Supply Fan VFD

Return/Exhaust Fan (HP) 3 - -

Return/Exhaust Fan VFD

Approx Age 14 14 14

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 1 1 1

Comments

460/3/60

Note:"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A Yes No N/A


Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Ventnor City Educational Complex Page 1 of 37


Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type

Cooling Capacity (Tons)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD

Return/Exhaust Fan (HP)


Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


RTU-8 RTU-7 RTU-6

DX/Gas DX/Gas DX/Gas

1 1 1

ROOF ROOF ROOF FRONT

MUA CAFETERIA HALLWAY

ARES CARRIER MCQUAY

HC2 48GX-02406031 RFS020CSA

A4193 0901G10264 FB0U01040077100

Split System DX Packaged DX Split System DX

- 2 20

- 12 SEER 10.1 EER (Est.)

Gas Furnace Gas Furnace Gas Furnace

235 60 400

- 80.60% 80%

- - 2

1.5

- - 1.5

14 14 14

15 15 15

1 1 1

Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A



Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD



Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


RTU-5 RTU-4 RTU-3


1 1 1

FRONT ROOF FRONT ROOF FRONT ROOF

CARRIER CARRIER CARRIER

48TCDD12A2D6A0A0A0 48TCDD12A2D6A0A0A0 48TCDD14A2D6A0A0A0

3213G20003 3213G20002 213G50125

Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

10 10 12.5

11.1 EER 11.1 EER 10.8 EER


180 180 180

82 82 82

- - -

- - -

2 2 2

15 15 15

13 13 13

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A



Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD



Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


RTU-2 RTU-25


1 1 1

ROOF BY MAIN ENTRANCE ROOF BY MAIN ENTRANCE ROOF


48TCDD08A2C6A0F0F0A0 48TFF012---601NB 48HJF005---631NB

3514P34050 1101G30610 1101G20203


7.5 10 4

11 EER 9 EER 11.05 EER


125 250 150

82 80 80

- - -

- - -

1 14 14

15 15 15

14 1 1

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A



Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD



Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


RTU-24 RTU-23 RAC-20


1 1 1

ROOF ROOF ROOF


48HJF004---631NB 48HJF005---631NB 48ES-A2406030TP

1101G24609 1101G24606 2210C79689


3 4 2

11.2 EER 11.05 EER 11 EER


115 120 60

80 80 80.6

- - -

- - -

14 14 5

15 15 15

1 1 10

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A



Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD



Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


RAC-1 RAC-3 RAC-11


1 1 1

ROOF BACK ROOF ROOF


48TCRA06A1D6A2F2C0 48TCRA06A1D6A2F2C0 48PGLC04DAL60STJ

2310G40244 2310G40247 2610G40026


5 5 3

10.75 EER 10.75 EER 11.7 EER


125 115 51

81 81 81

- - -

- - -

5 5 5

15 15 15

10 10 10

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A



Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD



Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


RAC-13 RAC-17, RAC-14

DX/Gas DX/Gas

1 1 2

ROOF ROOF ROOF


48PGNC03DAL30STJ 50HJ-009-B631HV 48PGNC03DAL30STJ

2610G50012 5002G20598 2610G50008


2 8.5 2

11.4 EER 10.8 EER 11.4 EER

Gas Furnace No Heating Gas Furnace

51 N/A 51

80 N/A 80

- - -

- - -

5 13 5

15 15 15

10 2 10

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes

Yes

No N/A

No N/A



Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD



Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


RAC-5, 6, 9, 8, 7, 10 RAC-18, RAC-15 RAC-12, RAC-16


6 2 2

ROOF ROOF ROOF


48PGLC04DAL60STJ 48PGNC03DAL30STJ 48PGLC05DAL60STJ

2610G40030 2610G50011 2610G40025


3 2 3.96

11.7 11.4 EER 14.8 SEER


51 51 51

80 80 81

- - -

- - -

5 5 5

15 15 15

10 10 10

Yes

Yes

No N/A

No N/A

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No N/A

Yes No

N/A

N/A N/A



Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD



Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


RAC-2, RAC-4 RTU-14 RAC-19

DX/Gas DX/Gas Reheat DX/Gas

2 1 1

ROOF ROOF ROOF

CAFETERIA


48TCRA06A1D6A2F2C0 39NC26 48ES-A2406030TP

2310G40245 2101V102831 2210C79718

Packaged DX Split System DX Packaged DX

4.92 80 2

13 SEER 10.1 EER (CU) 11 EER


115 - 60

81 - 80.60%

- N/A -

- 5 -

5 14 5

15 15 15

10 1 10

x2 Reznor Gas-Fired unitsAO Smith Motor, 1745

RPM, 5HP

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No Yes No

Yes No Yes No N/A

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A



Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD



Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


RTU-12 RTU-26 RTU 10.1

DX/Gas DX/Gas DX/ GAS FURNACE

1 1 1

ROOF ROOF GYM ROOF

RMS N-83 THRU N-88 GYM

LENNOX CARRIER MCQUAY

LGA240HH1G 48HJF015 RAH047CSA

5601D00166 1200F87359 FB0U01040073502

Packaged DX Packaged DX Split System DX

20 12.5 120

11 EER 10.6 EER 10.1 EER (CU, Est.)


470 225 417-1250 MBH

80% 81% -

- - 15

- - 3

14 15 14

15 15 15

1 0 1

7.5 HP Motor

Yes No N/AYes No

Yes No N/A

N/A Yes No

Yes No N/A

N/A Yes No

Yes No N/A

N/A



Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD



Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


DX

1

Courtyard

-

Carrier

50HJ-006---321NB

1101G21105

Packaged DX

5

11.05 EER

No Heating

N/A

N/A

-

-

14

15

1

Yes No

Yes No N/A

N/A



Air Handlers

Air Handler UnitsTag

Unit Type AHU Split Dx/HW

Qty 2

Location Auditorium

Area Served Auditorium

Manufacturer Trane

Model No. -

Serial No. -

Cooling Type Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) -

Heating Type Hot Water

Heating Input (MBH) -

Supply Fan (HP) -

Supply Fan VFD

Return Fan (HP) N/A

Return Fan VFD

Approx Age -

ASHRAE Service Life 20

Remaining Life

CommentsPneumatic Valves; Added

DX Coil; Freeze pump; Suspended above floor,

couldn't read tags


Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A



Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type Console Unit Unit Ventilator

Qty 1 -

Location Nurse's Office 100, 200, and 300 Wing Classrooms

Area Served Nurse's Office 100 & 200 Wing Classrooms

Manufacturer Thermal Zone Airedale

Model No. MSC424HP13230EA CHX3/2-460/410-JD

Serial No. - 733196S3105003551530105821

Cooling Type Split System DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 2 3

Cooling Efficiency -

Heating Type Hot Water

Heating Input (MBH) 24

Heating Efficiency -

Approx Age 14

ASHRAE Service Life 20 20

Remaining Life 6 20

CommentsR410A Refrigerant

V/P/Hz: 460 ‐ 3 ‐ 60;

R410A Refrigerant;

Energy Recovery




Boilers

BoilersTag Boiler 1/ Boiler 2 B-1,B-2

Unit Type Condensing (Water) Condensing (Water)

Qty 2 2

Location Boiler Room 613 Boiler Room by 308

Manufacturer Harsco Industrial/Patterson-Kelley Harsco Industrial/Patterson-Kelley

Model No. C-2000 C-2500

Serial No. R945-10-6170 H934-14-11054

Input Capacity (Btu/h) 2,000,000 2,500,000

Output Capacity (Btu/h) 1,920,000 2,375,000

Approx. Efficiency % 95.0% 93.4%

Fuel Type Natural Gas Natural Gas

Approx Age 5 1


Remaining Life 19 23

CommentsP-K Mach Boilers




Dom HWH

Domestic Water HeatersTag

Unit Type Natural Gas Water Heater

Natural Gas Water Heater

Qty 4 1

Location Boiler Room 613 Boiler Room 613

Area Served - -

Manufacturer A.O. Smith A.O. Smith

Model # BTH 199 966 BTH 199 100

Serial # MF01-1036660-966 0927M000126

Storage Size (Gal) 100 100

Input Capacity (MBH/KW) 199.9 199.9

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 228 230.18

Efficiency % 94% 96%

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas

Approx Age 14 6


Remaining Life 1 9

Comments




Dom HWH

Domestic Water HeatersTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Storage Size (Gal)

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

Recovery (Gal/Hr)

Efficiency %

Fuel

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


H/W Heater #1, #2Natural Gas Water

Heater

2

Boiler Room by 308

-

Bradford White

EF100T399E3NA2

LG34689464

100

399

450.9

96%

Natural Gas

1

15

14



Pumps

PumpsTag P-3,P-4 P-5,P-6

Unit Type Base-mounted Pipe-mounted

Qty 2 2

Location Boiler Room 613 Boiler Room 613

System Served Heating Hot Water Heating Hot Water

Manufacturer - Bell & Gossett

Model # - N/A

Serial # - C133715-01G11

Horse Power 5.0 3.0

Flow Rate (GPM) - 60

Head Pressure (FTHD) - 65

Motor Manufacturer Allis-Chalmers WEG

Motor Frame 184T 182JM

Electrical Power (V/P/HZ)

208 - 3 - 60 208-230/460 - 3 - 60

Motor RPM 1740 1760

Motor Efficiency % 87.5% 86.5%

Pump VFD

Approx Age 18 4


Remaining Life 0 14

Comments





Pumps

PumpsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

System Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Horse Power

Flow Rate (GPM)

Head Pressure (FTHD)

Motor Manufacturer

Motor Frame


Motor RPM

Motor Efficiency %

Pump VFD

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


Pipe-mounted Pipe-mounted

1 2

Boiler Room 613 Boiler Room 613

Domestic Hot Water Heating Hot Water (Boiler)

TACO TACO

- KV 3006

1615B3E1 5.4 -

0.5 1.0

- -

- -

Emerson Baldor

- 143JM

200 - 3 - 60 208-230/460 - 3 - 60

1725 1740

75.5%

4 4

18 18

14 14

Domestic Hot Water Circ Pump Boiler Circ Pump




Pumps

PumpsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

System Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Horse Power

Flow Rate (GPM)


Motor Manufacturer

Motor Frame


Motor RPM

Motor Efficiency %

Pump VFD

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


P-3,P-4 P-1, P-2

Base-mounted Base-mounted

2 2

Boiler Room by 308 Boiler Room by 308

Heating Hot Water Heating Hot Water

Bell & Gossett Bell & Gossett

- -

C193552-02J41 C193551 - 02J41

5.0 5.0

80 170

80 70

WEG WEG

182/4T 182/4T

208-230/460 - 3 - 60 208-230/460 - 3 - 60

1760 1760

89.5% 89.5%

1 1

18 18

17 17

size: e-1510 size: e-1510




Pumps

PumpsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

System Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Horse Power

Flow Rate (GPM)


Motor Manufacturer

Motor Frame


Motor RPM

Motor Efficiency %

Pump VFD

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


Pipe-mounted

2

Boiler Room by 308

Heating Hot Water (Boiler)

Bell & Gossett

-

C193553-01J41

0.8

120

12

Bell & Gossett

56Z

115/208-230 - 1 - 60

1425

1

18

17

Yes No N/A



Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag ACU-10.2-2 ACU-8 ACU-6

Unit Type Standard Air-Cooled Standard Air-Cooled Standard Air-Cooled

Qty 1 1 1

Location GYM ROOF ROOF ROOF FRONT

Area/Unit Served GYM KITCHEN MUA RTU-6

Manufacturer MCQUAY CARRIER CARRIER

Model No. ACR120AS27-ER10 38AKS028---600 38AUDA25A0E6A0A0A0

Serial No. STNU010400062 1901F82744 3414P45893

Refrigerant Type R-22 R-22 R-410a

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 120 25.0 20

Cooling Efficiency 10.1 EER (Est.) 10.1 EER (Est.) 11

Volts / Phase / Hz 460/3/60 460/3/60 460/3/60

Approx Age 14 14 1


Remaining Life 6 6 19

Comments




Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area/Unit Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Refrigerant Type


Cooling Efficiency

Volts / Phase / Hz

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


ACU ACU CU

Standard Air-Cooled Standard Air-Cooled Standard Air-Cooled

1 1 1

ROOF ROOF CENTER ROOF

TRANE TRANE RHEEM

RAUD-C156-A TTA180C30SGA RAKA-036CAS

C840C 8293JEDAD 4959M210106226

R-22 R-22 R-22

12.5 15 3

10.1 EER (Est.) 11.1 EER 10 SEER (Est.)

- 208/230/3/60 208/230/3/60

14 7 14

20 20 20

6 13 6

Off



Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area/Unit Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Refrigerant Type


Cooling Efficiency

Volts / Phase / Hz

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


CU CU CU-1


1 1 1

CENTER ROOF CENTER ROOF ROOF

GOODMAN PAYNE YORK

GS012036E0 PA10JA036A YCJD18S41S1HA

100021315 2300E15602 W1F0995322

R-22 R-22 R-410A

3 3 1.5

12 SEER 10 SEER (Est.) 13 SEER (Est.)

197/253 - 3 - 60 208/230/1/60 208/230 - 1 - 60

4 15 5

20 20 20

16 5 15



Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area/Unit Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Refrigerant Type


Cooling Efficiency

Volts / Phase / Hz

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments



1 1 1

ROOF ROOF ROOF

CARRIER SANYO TRANE

38AH-084---600-- C3632 TTA090A300CC

1301F72764 10071294 M154TF3AH

R-22 R-22 R-22

80 3.0 7.5

10.1 EER 10.8 SEER 10.1 EER (Est.)

460 - 3 - 60 208/230 - 1 - 60 208-230 - 3 - 60

14 16 18

20 20 20

6 4 2



Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area/Unit Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Refrigerant Type


Cooling Efficiency

Volts / Phase / Hz

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


ACU-10.1-2


1 1 1

ROOF ROOF GYM ROOF

GYM

ICP TRANE MCQUAY

CAC060HCA TTA120B300BC ACR120AS27-ER10

E051012369 M175YY4AH STNU010400067

R-22 R-22 R-22

5 10 120

10.15 SEER / 10 EER 10.1 EER (Est.) 10.1 EER (Est.)

208/230 - 3 - 60 208-230 - 3 - 60 460 - 3 - 60

10 18 14

20 20 20

10 2 6



Large Exhaust Fans

Large Exhaust FansTag KX-1 TX-23, TX-3 90C15D

Unit Type Up Blast Down Blast Down Blast

Qty 1 2 1

Location Roof Roof Roof

Area Served Kitchen

Manufacturer Loren Cook Company Cook Cook

Model # 245V9B 70C15DH 90 ACEH 90C15DH

Motor (HP) 2 1/20 1/8

Electrical (V/H/P) - 115 - 60 - 1 115 - 60 - 1

Approx Age 14 - 8


Remaining Life 6 - 12

Comments




Large Exhaust Fans

Large Exhaust FansTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Motor (HP)

Electrical (V/H/P)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments


Down Blast

1

Roof

Cook

100C2B

1/6

115 - 60 - 1

-

20



Transformers

TransformersTag

Unit Type Dry Type Dry Type Dry Type

Qty 1 1 1

Location - - Kiln Room

Manufacturer GE - GE

Catalog No. 9T23L1579 - 9T21B9106

Serial No. K 146992 - -

Rating (kVA) 500.0 - 25.0

Electrical (V/H/P) 480 - 60 - 3 - 480 - 60 - 1

Impedance (%) 3.5% - 2.4%

Approx Age - - -


Remaining Life - - -

Comments Suspended above ground, couldn't read tag




Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type Exhaust Hood Braising Pan Dual-Rack Oven

Qty 2 1 2

Location Kitchen Kitchen Kitchen

Manufacturer Greenheck Blodgett Blodgett

Model No. GHFW-90833-S - -

Serial No. - - -

Fuel Electric Gas Gas

Comments




Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments


Combination Range Kettle Walk-In Cooler/Freezer

1 1 1

Kitchen Kitchen Kitchen Storage

Garland Market Forge -

- - -

- - -

Gas Gas Electric

4 Burners x6 Evap Fans



Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments


Dishwasher Dishwasher Booster Reach-in Refrigerator

1 1 1

Kitchen Kitchen Kitchen

Hobart Hatco Hobart

CRS66A C-58 Q3

85-1025295 8099230110 32-1101667

- Electric Electric

V/P/Hz: 480/3/60 3-Door Refrigerator;V/P/Hz: 120/1/60



Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments


Reach-in Refrigerator Reach-in Refrigerator Warming Cabinet

1 2 2

Kitchen Kitchen Kitchen

- FWE FWE

- - -

- - -

Electric Electric Gas

Blue Bunny Ice Cream Freezer



Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments


Steam Table Reach-in Refrigerator Reach-in Refrigerator

2 1 1

Kitchen Kitchen Snack Stand

Delfield - -

KCSC-60-B - -

- - -

Gas Electric Electric

Ice cream freezer Ice cream freezer



Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments


Reach-in Refrigerator Residential Refrigerator Drink Machine

1 1 2

Snack Stand Faculty Cafeteria Faculty Cafeteria, Gym Hallway

- Kenmore -

- 25361462100 -

- BA20521034 -

Electric Electric Electric

Snapple Drink Refrigerator

Coca-Cola vending machine



Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments


Washer Residential Refrigerator Dryer

1 1 1

Nurse's Office Nurse's Office Nurse's Office

Roper Kenmore Whirpool

RTW4640YQ1 52512100 LER7646EQ2

C24621430 SL2248955 MH1205747


Manufactured: 2012 Manufactured: 1998



Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments


Air Compressor Residential Refrigerator

Residential Refrigerator

1 1 1

Boiler Room by 308 Faculty Room Faculty Room

- Whirlpool Kenmore

- W4TXNWFWQ00 564.891282

- VSY1905742 30520623


(x2) 1.5 HP Baldor Motors;

Attached to Robert Shaw Pneumatics (Old

Gym)

V/P/Hz: 115 - 1 - 60Manufactured: 2009 Mini Fridge



Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments


Kiln Mini Fridge Snack Machine

1 1 1

Kiln Room Break Room Gym Hallway

Blue Diamond GE -

TM-18 - -

94-10 - -


5,760 Watts




APPENDIX E

CEG Project #:Facility Name: Address:City, State, Zip

Fixture Reference # Location

Average Burn Hours

Description Lamps per Fixture

Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures

Total kW Usage kWh/Yr Work Description Equipment Description Lamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref # Controls Description Qty of

Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $ Material Total Labor Total All Rebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

Materials Total Labor Total All Simple Payback

1 500 Gym 3000 4-Lamp T5 Electronic1x4 Pendant Mounted Cage 4 236 30 7.08 21,240 Existing to Remain No Change 4 236 0 7.08 21,240 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 YES -

2 500 Gym 3000 2-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 33 5 0.17 495 Re-Lamp/Reflector

Seesmart LED 2' Tube 9W 4Kwith semi Specular Reflector Kitbypass ballast and provide new

tombstones

2 18 5 0.09 270 0.08 225 $27 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $200.00 $225.00 $425.00 $50.00 13.89 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

3 509 Gym Storage 400 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Pendant Prismatic 1 32 2 0.06 26 Re-Lamp

Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new

tombstones1 15 2 0.03 12 0.03 14 $2 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $90.00 $150.00 $10.00 85.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 508 Gym Office 4000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 3 0.19 744 Re-Lamp / Reflector

Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kwith semi Specular Reflector Kitbypass ballast and provide new

tombstones

2 30 3 0.09 360 0.10 384 $46 1 Existing Occupancy Controls 1 20.0% 72 $9 $180.00 $135.00 $315.00 $30.00 6.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

1 505 Old Gym 3000 4-Lamp T5 Electronic1x4 Pendant Mounted Cage 4 236 12 2.83 8,496 Existing to Remain No Change 4 236 0 2.83 8,496 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

5 505 Old Gym Storage 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Utility 2 62 4 0.25 99 Re-Lamp


tombstones2 30 4 0.12 48 0.13 51 $6 1 Existing Occupancy

Controls 1 20.0% 10 $1 $240.00 $180.00 $420.00 $40.00 61.85 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

6 505 Old Gym Office Boys Locker Room 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic

2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 2 0.19 484 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new


Controls 1 20.0% 47 $6 $180.00 $90.00 $270.00 $30.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

8 504 Boys Locker Room 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic



20 504 Boys Locker Room 2600 FC9T5 Circ-Line Magnetic 1 28 3 0.08 218 Replace Terralux SR8 LED Circular

Surface Fixture Retrofit 1 16 3 0.05 125 0.04 94 $11 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $255.00 $135.00 $390.00 $0.00 34.72 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

8 504 Boys Locker Room Hallway 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic



Controls 1 20.0% 36 $4 $120.00 $90.00 $210.00 $20.00 8.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

2 501 Boys Bathroom 2600 2-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 33 2 0.07 172 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


2 502 Girls Bathroom 2600 2-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 33 2 0.07 172 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


9 D7 Cafeteria/Gym Entrance 3000 3-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"

Recessed Prismatic 3 92 13 1.20 3,588 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones

3 27 13 0.35 1,053 0.85 2,535 $304 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $780.00 $585.00 $1,365.00 $195.00 3.85 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

8 Hallway by Cafeteria 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 8 0.50 1,488 Re-Lamp



10 600 Cafeteria 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Direct/Indirect 2 62 120 7.44 22,320 Re-Lamp


tombstones2 30 120 3.60 10,800 3.84 11,520 $1,382 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $7,200.00 $5,400.00 $12,600.00 $1,200.00 8.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 600 Cafeteria 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 10 0.62 1,860 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones

2 30 10 0.30 900 0.32 960 $115 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $600.00 $450.00 $1,050.00 $100.00 8.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

Ventnor, NJ 08406400 N. Lafayette Ave.

1C15142Ventnor City Educational Complex

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - Ventnor City Educational Complex rev1 Page 1 of 19


Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




11 600 Cafeteria 3000 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 2 0.12 372 Re-Lamp/Reflector

Seesmart LED U-Tube 18W 4K with semi Specular Reflector Kitbypass ballast and provide new

tombstones


12 Cafeteria Storage 400 1-Lamp T8 Electronic0.5x4 Pendant Tube Guard 1 32 6 0.19 77 Re-Lamp



13 Serving Line 600 4-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 4 114 6 0.68 410 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


13 Kitchen 600 4-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 4 114 8 0.91 547 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


14 Kitchen Hoods 600 Incandescent (60W) 1 60 4 0.24 144 Replace Philips LED A19 10.5W 1 10.5 4 0.04 25 0.20 119 $14 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $52.00 $0.00 $52.00 $40.00 0.84 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

15 615 Kitchen Storage Entry 3000 4-Lamp T8 Electronic

1x4 Pendant Prismatic 4 114 4 0.46 1,368 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new


15 614 Kitchen Storage 400 4-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic 4 114 7 0.80 319 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp



16 Freezer 600 Incandescent (53W) 1 53 6 0.32 191 Replace Philips LED A19 10.5W 1 10.5 6 0.06 38 0.26 153 $18 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $78.00 $0.00 $78.00 $60.00 0.98 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

6 Kitchen Office 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 4 0.37 1,488 Re-Lamp



11 Kitchen Bathroom 1 1200 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 74 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


11 Kitchen Bathroom 2 1200 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 74 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


17 Cafeteria Snack Stand 600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Wall Mounted Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 37 Re-Lamp



11 Faculty 2600 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 4 0.25 645 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


13 216 Nurse's Office Waiting 4000 4-Lamp T8 Electronic

2x4 Recessed Prismatic 4 114 1 0.11 456 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


6 Nurse's Office 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 8 0.74 2,976 Re-Lamp


tombstones3 45 8 0.36 1,440 0.38 1,536 $184 1 Existing Occupancy

Controls 1 20.0% 288 $35 $720.00 $360.00 $1,080.00 $120.00 5.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

8 Nurse's Bathroom 1200 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 74 Re-Lamp



6 Nurse Testing 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 2 0.19 744 Re-Lamp





Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




8 Nurse Storage 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 25 Re-Lamp



18 Nurse's Office 4000 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Wall Mounted Prismatic 1 32 4 0.13 512 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 48 $6 $120.00 $180.00 $300.00 $20.00 8.58 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

19 Storage By Cafeteria 400 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Pendant Prismatic 3 93 1 0.09 37 Re-Lamp



20 Storage By Cafeteria 400 FC9T5 Circ-Line Magnetic 1 28 1 0.03 11 Replace Terralux SR8 LED Circular Surface Fixture Retrofit 1 16 1 0.02 6 0.01 5 $1 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $85.00 $45.00 $130.00 $0.00 225.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 214 Supervisor's Office 4000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic

1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 12 0.74 2,976 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new

tombstones2 30 12 0.36 1,440 0.38 1,536 $184 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $540.00 $1,260.00 $120.00 6.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 608 Main Office 4000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 8 0.50 1,984 Re-Lamp


tombstones2 30 8 0.24 960 0.26 1,024 $123 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $480.00 $360.00 $840.00 $80.00 6.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

22 Conference Room 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Opaque Lens 3 93 4 0.37 1,488 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


23 Conference Room Closet 400 Incandescent (75W) 1 75 1 0.08 30 Replace TCP 13W LED A21 LED 1 13 1 0.01 5 0.06 25 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $18.00 $0.00 $18.00 $10.00 2.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Main Office Kitchen 600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 2 0.12 74 Re-Lamp



23 Bathroom ("Powder Room") 1200 Incandescent (75W) 1 75 1 0.08 90 Replace TCP 13W LED A21 LED 1 13 1 0.01 16 0.06 74 $9 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $18.00 $0.00 $18.00 $10.00 0.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Principal's Office 4000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 8 0.50 1,984 Re-Lamp


tombstones2 30 8 0.24 960 0.26 1,024 $123 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $480.00 $360.00 $840.00 $80.00 6.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Principal's Office Storage 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic

1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 25 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new


21 Office 4000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 3 0.19 744 Re-Lamp



23 Principal's Office Bathroom 1200 Incandescent (75W) 1 75 1 0.08 90 Replace TCP 13W LED A21 LED 1 13 1 0.01 16 0.06 74 $9 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $18.00 $0.00 $18.00 $10.00 0.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Hallway F 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 3 0.19 558 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


4 Hallway F2 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 2 0.12 372 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


4 Auditorium 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 27 1.67 4,352 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones

2 30 27 0.81 2,106 0.86 2,246 $270 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,620.00 $1,215.00 $2,835.00 $270.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -



Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




32 Auditorium 2600 PAR Lamp 1 150 7 1.05 2,730 Replace TCP 23W LED Par38 1 23 7 0.16 419 0.89 2,311 $277 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $490.00 $0.00 $490.00 $0.00 1.77 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Stage Storage 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 2 0.12 50 Re-Lamp



23 Stage Storage Bathroom 1200 Incandescent (75W) 1 75 1 0.08 90 Replace TCP 13W LED A21 LED 1 13 1 0.01 16 0.06 74 $9 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $18.00 $0.00 $18.00 $10.00 0.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

2 Hallway F3 3000 2-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 33 2 0.07 198 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


4 Hallway F4 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 9 0.56 1,674 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


23 Hallway F4 3000 Incandescent (75W) 1 75 1 0.08 225 Replace TCP 13W LED A21 LED 1 13 1 0.01 39 0.06 186 $22 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $18.00 $0.00 $18.00 $10.00 0.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Hallway B 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 14 0.87 2,604 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


8 Hallway B 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 5 0.31 930 Re-Lamp



8 Hallway D 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 14 0.87 2,604 Re-Lamp



8 Hallway A 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 13 0.81 2,418 Re-Lamp



4 Hallway A 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 2 0.12 372 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


2 Hallway E 3000 2-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 33 4 0.13 396 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


4 Hallway E 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 13 0.81 2,418 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


2 Hallway I 3000 2-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 33 5 0.17 495 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


26 Hallway H 3000 3-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 3 53 7 0.37 1,113 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


18 Hallway H 3000 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Wall Mounted Prismatic 1 32 80 2.56 7,680 Re-Lamp


tombstones1 15 80 1.20 3,600 1.36 4,080 $490 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $2,400.00 $3,600.00 $6,000.00 $400.00 11.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

2 Hallway G2 3000 2-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 33 4 0.13 396 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones




Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




64 Hallway G2 3000 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 7 0.45 1,344 Replace Terralux DR10 Series 27W LED Circular Recessed Fixture 1 27 7 0.19 567 0.26 777 $93 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $595.00 $315.00 $910.00 $0.00 9.76 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 001 Classroom 2600 3-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 3 53 11 0.58 1,516 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


17 001 Classroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Wall Mounted Prismatic 2 62 4 0.25 645 Re-Lamp



28 001 Classroom 2600 1-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 1 32 13 0.42 1,082 Replace Terralux DR6 Series LED Circular Recessed Fixture 1 17 13 0.22 575 0.20 507 $61 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,040.00 $585.00 $1,625.00 $0.00 26.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

27 001 Classroom 2600 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 8 0.51 1,331 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.51 1,331 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

27 001 Storage 400 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 1 0.06 26 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.06 26 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

27 001 Bathroom 1200 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 1 0.06 77 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.06 77 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones


18 002 Classroom 2600 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Wall Mounted Prismatic 1 32 5 0.16 416 Re-Lamp




27 002 Storage 400 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 1 0.06 26 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.06 26 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

27 002 Bathroom 1200 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 1 0.06 77 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.06 77 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

18 Hallway G 3000 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Wall Mounted Prismatic 1 32 15 0.48 1,440 Re-Lamp


tombstones1 15 15 0.23 675 0.26 765 $92 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $450.00 $675.00 $1,125.00 $75.00 11.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

64 Hallway G 3000 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 8 0.51 1,536 Replace Terralux DR10 Series 27W LED Circular Recessed Fixture 1 27 8 0.22 648 0.30 888 $107 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $680.00 $360.00 $1,040.00 $0.00 9.76 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

28 004 Classroom 2600 1-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 1 32 7 0.22 582 Replace Terralux DR6 Series LED Circular Recessed Fixture 1 17 7 0.12 309 0.11 273 $33 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $560.00 $315.00 $875.00 $0.00 26.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 004 Classroom 2600 3-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 3 53 6 0.32 827 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones




Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal





27 004 Classroom Storage 400 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 1 0.06 26 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.06 26 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

27 004 Classroom Bathroom 1200 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 1 0.06 77 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.06 77 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

27 Storage by 004 400 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 1 0.06 26 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.06 26 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -



tombstones









26 013 Office 4000 3-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 3 53 4 0.21 848 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


29 014 Maintenance Closet 400 2-Lamp T12 Magnetic

1x8 Pendant Utility 2 131 2 0.26 105 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new


Controls 1 20.0% 10 $1 $240.00 $90.00 $330.00 $40.00 42.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




tombstones






27 007 Class Bathroom 1200 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 1 0.06 77 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.06 77 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -



Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




27 007 Class Storage 400 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 1 0.06 26 Existing to Remain No Change 2 64 0 0.06 26 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones











tombstones








4 015 Registration 4000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 4 0.25 992 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


28 008 Classroom 2600 1-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 1 32 9 0.29 749 Replace Terralux DR6 Series LED Circular Recessed Fixture 1 17 9 0.15 398 0.14 351 $42 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $405.00 $1,125.00 $0.00 26.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -



tombstones





Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal






28 009 Classroom 2600 1-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 1 32 11 0.35 915 Replace Terralux DR6 Series LED Circular Recessed Fixture 1 17 11 0.19 486 0.17 429 $51 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $880.00 $495.00 $1,375.00 $0.00 26.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 009 Classroom 2600 3-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 3 53 6 0.32 827 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones











tombstones








30 611 Music 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic 2 62 29 1.80 4,675 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 452 $54 $1,740.00 $1,305.00 $3,045.00 $290.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

17 611 Music 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Wall Mounted Prismatic 2 62 4 0.25 645 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 62 $7 $240.00 $180.00 $420.00 $40.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

15 611 Music 2600 4-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic 4 114 2 0.23 593 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 47 $6 $180.00 $90.00 $270.00 $30.00 5.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00



Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




21 611 Music Drum Room 1 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic



21 611 Music Drum Room 2 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic



6 611 Music Room Office 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic



30 612 Music Room 2 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic 2 62 48 2.98 7,738 Re-Lamp



17 612 Music Room 2 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Wall Mounted Prismatic 2 62 4 0.25 645 Re-Lamp



31 613 Electrical Room 400 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Pendant Direct 1 32 5 0.16 64 Re-Lamp



32 Stage Door Auditorium 2600 PAR Lamp 1 150 4 0.60 1,560 Replace TCP 23W LED Par38 1 23 4 0.09 239 0.51 1,321 $158 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $280.00 $0.00 $280.00 $0.00 1.77 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

33 Stage Door Auditorium 2600 2-Lamp CFL (18W) 2 36 5 0.18 468 Existing to Remain No Change 2 36 0 0.18 468 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 100 Classroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 21 1.30 3,385 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 328 $39 $1,260.00 $945.00 $2,205.00 $210.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00


35 100/102 Classroom Storage 400 1-Lamp T8 Electronic

4' Ceiling Mounted Prsimatic 1 32 5 0.16 64 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new


30 Custodian's Closet 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 25 Re-Lamp



30 Storage 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 25 Re-Lamp



32 Storage 400 PAR Lamp 1 150 1 0.15 60 Replace TCP 23W LED Par38 1 23 1 0.02 9 0.13 51 $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $70.00 $0.00 $70.00 $0.00 11.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




Controls 1 20.0% 406 $49 $1,560.00 $1,170.00 $2,730.00 $260.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00





Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00



Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal








Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00





Controls 1 20.0% 406 $49 $1,560.00 $1,170.00 $2,730.00 $260.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00


35 104/106 Storage 400 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Ceiling Mounted Prsimatic 1 32 5 0.16 64 Re-Lamp






Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00





Controls 1 20.0% 328 $39 $1,260.00 $945.00 $2,205.00 $210.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00





Controls 1 20.0% 218 $26 $840.00 $630.00 $1,470.00 $140.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

35 107 Classroom Board 2600 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Ceiling Mounted Prsimatic 1 32 5 0.16 416 Re-Lamp







Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $1,080.00 $2,520.00 $240.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 250 $30 $960.00 $720.00 $1,680.00 $160.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 265 $32 $1,020.00 $765.00 $1,785.00 $170.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $1,080.00 $2,520.00 $240.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00



Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal







Controls 1 20.0% 265 $32 $1,020.00 $765.00 $1,785.00 $170.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 265 $32 $1,020.00 $765.00 $1,785.00 $170.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

21 Boys Bathroom Hallway E 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic



13 200 Classroom 2600 4-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 4 114 21 2.39 6,224 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones

3 45 21 0.95 2,457 1.45 3,767 $452 1 Existing Occupancy Controls 1 20.0% 491 $59 $1,890.00 $945.00 $2,835.00 $315.00 5.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

23 200 Classroom Storage 400 Incandescent (75W) 1 75 1 0.08 30 Replace TCP 13W LED A21 LED 1 13 1 0.01 5 0.06 25 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $18.00 $0.00 $18.00 $10.00 2.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 201 PT/OT 4000 3-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2x2 Recessed Prismatic 3 53 7 0.37 1,484 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


21 Storage Between Hallway E Restrooms 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic



36 614 Boiler Room 400 4-Lamp T8 Electronic 4' Pendant 4 114 1 0.11 46 Re-Lamp



34 614 Boiler Room 400 2-Lamp 2-Pin 13w CFL 2 26 2 0.05 21 Existing to Remain No Change 2 26 0 0.05 21 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

37 614 Boiler Room 400 Incandescent A-Lamp (100W) 1 100 1 0.10 40 Replace Philips 18W LED A-Lamp 1 18 1 0.02 7 0.08 33 $4 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $15.00 $0.00 $15.00 $10.00 1.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

38 614 Boiler Room 400 CFL (42W) 1 42 1 0.04 17 Existing to Remain No Change 1 42 0 0.04 17 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

39 308 Boiler Room 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Ceiling Mounted Utility 2 62 9 0.56 223 Re-Lamp



9 Administrative Office 4000 3-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 3 92 14 1.29 5,152 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones

3 27 14 0.38 1,512 0.91 3,640 $437 1 Existing Occupancy Controls 1 20.0% 302 $36 $840.00 $630.00 $1,470.00 $210.00 2.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

9 BA Office 4000 3-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 3 92 4 0.37 1,472 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones

3 27 4 0.11 432 0.26 1,040 $125 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $180.00 $420.00 $60.00 2.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

9 Mail Room 4000 3-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 3 92 4 0.37 1,472 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones

3 27 4 0.11 432 0.26 1,040 $125 1 Existing Occupancy Controls 1 20.0% 86 $10 $240.00 $180.00 $420.00 $60.00 2.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

9 Toilet Room 1200 3-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 3 92 1 0.09 110 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


9 Office 4000 3-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 3 92 7 0.64 2,576 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones

3 27 7 0.19 756 0.46 1,820 $218 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $420.00 $315.00 $735.00 $105.00 2.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -



Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




9 Closet 1 400 3-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 3 92 1 0.09 37 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


9 Closet 2 400 3-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 3 92 1 0.09 37 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


21 3rd Grade Commons 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 21 1.30 3,906 Re-Lamp


tombstones2 30 21 0.63 1,890 0.67 2,016 $242 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,260.00 $945.00 $2,205.00 $210.00 8.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

40 3rd Grade Commons 3000 4-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 4 114 10 1.14 3,420 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp






Controls 1 20.0% 156 $19 $600.00 $450.00 $1,050.00 $100.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

35 109 Classroom Board Lights 2600 1-Lamp T8 Electronic

4' Ceiling Mounted Prsimatic 1 32 5 0.16 416 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new





Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

35 110 Classroom 2600 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Ceiling Mounted Prsimatic 1 32 5 0.16 416 Re-Lamp






Controls 1 20.0% 359 $43 $1,380.00 $1,035.00 $2,415.00 $230.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00







Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 39 $5 $150.00 $225.00 $375.00 $25.00 13.20 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

34 Storage Closet 400 2-Lamp 2-Pin 13w CFL 2 26 1 0.03 10 Existing to Remain No Change 2 26 0 0.03 10 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 4th Grade Commons 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 21 1.30 3,906 Re-Lamp



34 IT Server Closet 2600 2-Lamp 2-Pin 13w CFL 2 26 2 0.05 135 Existing to Remain No Change 2 26 0 0.05 135 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00



Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal










Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00







Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00







Controls 1 20.0% 359 $43 $1,380.00 $1,035.00 $2,415.00 $230.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

21 212A Speech Classroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic

1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 12 0.74 1,934 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new


21 Girl's Restroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 4 0.25 645 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 62 $7 $240.00 $180.00 $420.00 $40.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

41 Staff Lavatory 1200 4-Lamp Incandescent (40W) 4 160 1 0.16 192 Replace Philips LED A19 6W 4 24 1 0.02 29 0.14 163 $20 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $0.00 $60.00 $40.00 1.02 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Vestibule D3 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 2 0.12 372 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


6 215 Office / Small Classroom 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic

2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 6 0.56 2,232 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new


Controls 1 20.0% 216 $26 $540.00 $270.00 $810.00 $90.00 5.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

21 Boys Restroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 4 0.25 645 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 62 $7 $240.00 $180.00 $420.00 $40.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

6 Classroom 307 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 16 1.49 3,869 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $720.00 $2,160.00 $240.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

21 Janitor's Closet 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 25 Re-Lamp



4 Boys Restroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 3 0.19 484 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


6 308 Classroom 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 16 1.49 3,869 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $720.00 $2,160.00 $240.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

7 Hall Display Case 1 3000 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Recessed Prismatic 1 32 3 0.10 288 Re-Lamp





Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




42 Hall Display Case 2 3000 1-Lamp T8 Magnetic3' Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 1 33 2 0.07 198 Re-Lamp






Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $720.00 $2,160.00 $240.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

43 310/311 Media Center 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Parabolic 3 93 63 5.86 15,233 Re-Lamp



6 Media Center Office 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 10 0.93 3,720 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 360 $43 $900.00 $450.00 $1,350.00 $150.00 5.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $720.00 $2,160.00 $240.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

6 314 Computer Lab 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 11 1.02 2,660 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 257 $31 $990.00 $495.00 $1,485.00 $165.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 328 $39 $1,260.00 $630.00 $1,890.00 $210.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 281 $34 $1,080.00 $540.00 $1,620.00 $180.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 140 $17 $540.00 $270.00 $810.00 $90.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 211 $25 $810.00 $405.00 $1,215.00 $135.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 211 $25 $810.00 $405.00 $1,215.00 $135.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 211 $25 $810.00 $405.00 $1,215.00 $135.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 211 $25 $810.00 $405.00 $1,215.00 $135.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00







Controls 1 20.0% 211 $25 $810.00 $405.00 $1,215.00 $135.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

43 323 Classroom 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Parabolic 3 93 9 0.84 2,176 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 211 $25 $810.00 $405.00 $1,215.00 $135.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

39 300 Storage 400 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Ceiling Mounted Utility 2 62 6 0.37 149 Re-Lamp





Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal







Controls 1 20.0% 140 $17 $540.00 $270.00 $810.00 $90.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 140 $17 $540.00 $270.00 $810.00 $90.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

44 313-325 Hallway 3000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 4' Pendant Direct/Indirect 3 93 16 1.49 4,464 Re-Lamp



8 313-325 Hallway 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 2 0.12 372 Re-Lamp



45 313-325 Hallway 3000 CFL (26W) 1 26 2 0.05 156 Existing to Remain No Change 1 26 0 0.05 156 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

8 308-312 Hallway 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 13 0.81 2,418 Re-Lamp



8 Boys Restroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 3 0.19 484 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 47 $6 $180.00 $135.00 $315.00 $30.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

8 Girls Restroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 3 0.19 484 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 47 $6 $180.00 $135.00 $315.00 $30.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

6 506 Shop Classroom 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 36 3.35 8,705 Re-Lamp






Controls 1 20.0% 257 $31 $990.00 $495.00 $1,485.00 $165.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




46 Display Case 3000 1-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2' Ceiling Mounted Direct 1 22 2 0.04 132 Re-Lamp

Seesmart LED 2' Tube 9W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new


6 Middle School Office 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 7 0.65 2,604 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 252 $30 $630.00 $315.00 $945.00 $105.00 5.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

47 Middle School Office Restroom 1200 1-Lamp Incandescent (40W) 1 40 1 0.04 48 Replace Philips LED A19 6W 1 6 1 0.01 7 0.03 41 $5 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $15.00 $0.00 $15.00 $10.00 1.02 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

6 Middle School Sub-Office 1 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic



6 Middle School Sub-Office 2 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic



Controls 1 20.0% 108 $13 $270.00 $135.00 $405.00 $45.00 5.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

48 Middle School Sub-Office 2 Closet 400 2-Lamp T12 Magnetic

4' Pendant Utility 2 68 1 0.07 27 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new




Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




13 Conference Room 4000 4-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 4 114 5 0.57 2,280 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones

3 45 5 0.23 900 0.35 1,380 $166 1 Existing Occupancy Controls 1 20.0% 180 $22 $450.00 $225.00 $675.00 $75.00 3.62 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

6 Break Room 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 93 2 0.19 484 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 47 $6 $180.00 $90.00 $270.00 $30.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

49 Hall Display Case 3000 1-Lamp T8 Magnetic4' Recessed Prismatic 1 39 4 0.16 468 Re-Lamp



50 Hall Display by 301 3000 1-Lamp T8 Electronic3' Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 1 27 2 0.05 162 Re-Lamp



6 301 Science Classroom 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic



51 301 Science Classroom 2600 CFL Flood (26W) 1 26 4 0.10 270 Existing to Remain No Change 1 26 0 0.10 270 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

6 301 Science Classroom Office 4000 3-Lamp T8 Electronic



30 Green House 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic 2 62 7 0.43 1,128 Re-Lamp






Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $720.00 $2,160.00 $240.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $720.00 $2,160.00 $240.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

50 Hall Display Case by 304 3000 1-Lamp T8 Electronic

3' Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 1 27 2 0.05 162 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 12W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new





52 303 Kiln Room 2600 3-Lamp T12 Magnetic2x4 Recessed Prismatic 3 130 4 0.52 1,352 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones





Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $720.00 $2,160.00 $240.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




Controls 1 20.0% 374 $45 $1,440.00 $720.00 $2,160.00 $240.00 8.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

8 Girls Restroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 3 0.19 484 Re-Lamp



Controls 1 20.0% 47 $6 $180.00 $135.00 $315.00 $30.00 9.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

8 330-322 Hall 3000 2-Lamp T8 Electronic1x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 6 0.37 1,116 Re-Lamp





Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




53 Lobby by 506 3000 4-Lamp T8 Electronic4x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 4 114 4 0.46 1,368 Re-Lamp



45 Lobby by 506 3000 CFL (26W) 1 26 9 0.23 702 Existing to Remain No Change 1 26 0 0.23 702 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

11 Lobby by 506 3000 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 12 0.74 2,232 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones

2 36 12 0.43 1,296 0.31 936 $112 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $840.00 $540.00 $1,380.00 $120.00 11.22 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

7 Display Case 3000 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Recessed Prismatic 1 32 4 0.13 384 Re-Lamp



54 400 Boys Restroom 2600 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U2x2 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 161 Re-Lamp

Seesmart LED U-Tube 18W 4K bypass ballast and provide new


55 400 Boys Restroom 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 3 93 2 0.19 484 Re-Lamp



54 Girls Restroom 2600 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U2x2 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 161 Re-Lamp

Seesmart LED U-Tube 18W 4K bypass ballast and provide new


55 Girls Restroom 2600 3-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 3 93 2 0.19 484 Re-Lamp



56 Faculty Restroom 1200 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 74 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


4 405 Classroom 2600 2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 15 0.93 2,418 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


56 405 Classroom 2600 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 161 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones




tombstones




tombstones




tombstones


11 403 Classroom 2600 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 161 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones




tombstones




tombstones




Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal






tombstones




tombstones




tombstones




tombstones


11 400 Hallway 3000 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 26 1.61 4,836 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones

2 36 26 0.94 2,808 0.68 2,028 $243 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,820.00 $1,170.00 $2,990.00 $260.00 11.22 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

64 400 Hallway 3000 2-Lamp 4-Pin 32w CFL 2 64 9 0.58 1,728 Replace Terralux DR10 Series 27W LED Circular Recessed Fixture 1 27 9 0.24 729 0.33 999 $120 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $765.00 $405.00 $1,170.00 $0.00 9.76 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

18 400 Hallway 3000 1-Lamp T8 Electronic4' Wall Mounted Prismatic 1 32 16 0.51 1,536 Re-Lamp



56 400 Hall to Gym 3000 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U 1-5/8"Recessed Prismatic 2 62 3 0.19 558 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


11 BOE Office Conference Room 4000 2-Lamp FBO31 T8 U

2x2 Recessed Prismatic 2 62 5 0.31 1,240 Re-Lamp/Reflector


tombstones


57 Front Canopy 3000 HID Down Light (150W)Ceiling Mounted 1 186 5 0.93 2,790 Replace Neptun LED-12060 12" Square

Canopy Fixture 1 61 5 0.31 915 0.63 1,875 $225 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $2,150.00 $450.00 $2,600.00 $500.00 9.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

58 Front Canopy 3000 Metal Halide (100W)12" Fixture Recessed Prismatic 1 122 20 2.44 7,320 Replace

Global Supply 30W LED Retrofit Bulb

Bypass BallastE39 Mogul Base

1 30 20 0.60 1,800 1.84 5,520 $662 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $2,200.00 $900.00 $3,100.00 $0.00 4.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

59 Front Canopy 3000 Metal Halide (30W)4" Fixture Recessed Prismatic 1 36 14 0.50 1,512 Replace Terralux DRV Series LED

Recessed Fixture 1 17.5 14 0.25 735 0.26 777 $93 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,190.00 $630.00 $1,820.00 $0.00 19.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

57 Exterior Rear Canopy 3000 HID Down Light (150W)Ceiling Mounted 1 186 7 1.30 3,906 Replace Neptun LED-12060 12" Square

Canopy Fixture 1 61 7 0.43 1,281 0.88 2,625 $315 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $3,010.00 $630.00 $3,640.00 $700.00 9.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

60 Exterior 3000 CFL (26W)12" Wall Mounted Can 1 26 20 0.52 1,560 Existing to Remain No Change 1 26 0 0.52 1,560 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

61 Parking Lot 3000 Metal Halide (250W)Pole Mounted Shoebox 1 295 30 8.85 26,550 Replace

RAB Shoebox LED 78W ALED2T78 5100K

Replace Fixture in EntiretyRe-Sue Existing Pole and Base

1 78 30 2.34 7,020 6.51 19,530 $2,344 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $12,750.00 $8,100.00 $20,850.00 $3,000.00 7.62 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

62 Exterior 3000 Metal Halide (70W) Wall Pack 1 86 12 1.03 3,096 Replace RAB Exterior 12W LED Wall Pack 1 12 12 0.14 432 0.89 2,664 $320 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $2,184.00 $1,080.00 $3,264.00 $1,200.00 6.46 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

57 Canopy Side 3000 HID Down Light (150W)Ceiling Mounted 1 186 14 2.60 7,812 Replace Neptun LED-12060 12" Square

Canopy Fixture 1 61 14 0.85 2,562 1.75 5,250 $630 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $6,020.00 $1,260.00 $7,280.00 $1,400.00 9.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -



Average Burn Hours


Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings, kWh

Energy Savings, $


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal




34 Canopy Side 3000 2-Lamp 2-Pin 13w CFL 2 26 4 0.10 312 Existing to Remain No Change 2 26 0 0.10 312 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

63 Door #40 3000 Metal Halide (50W)12"x12" Ceiling Mounted Prismatic 1 68 1 0.07 204 Replace RAB 10W VANLED Canopy 1 12 1 0.01 36 0.06 168 $20 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $325.00 $90.00 $415.00 $100.00 15.63 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

TOTAL 2,551 185 501,802 2,350 93 251,698 92 250,104 $30,013 80 17 18,064 $2,168 $177,147 $112,860 $290,007 $30,220 8.66 $0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00




APPENDIX F

Appendix FPage 1 of 5

Location Description

Area (Sq FT) Panel Qty

Panel Sq Ft

Panel Total Sq

FtTotal KWDC

Total Annual kWh

Total KWAC

Panel Weight

(41.9 lbs) W/SQFTVentnor City Educational

Complex152357 SHARP

ND-240QCJ 1669 17.5 29,275 400.56 508,811 374.6 69,931 13.68


Current side parking lot layout

= Proposed PV Roof Layout = Proposed PV Parking Layout

Notes:

1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.


Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Ventnor City Educational ComplexLocation: Ventnor City, NJ

Description: Photovoltaic System 100% Financing - 15 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $1,827,549Annual kWh Production 508,811

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $71,234Average Annual SREC Revenue $77,087

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 15 Financing %: 100%

Discount Rate: 3% Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.140 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Financing Rate: 6.00% Average SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.152Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash Cumulative

Cash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow0 $0 0 0 0 $0 0 0 0 01 $0 508,811 $71,234 $0 $127,203 $107,544 $77,519 $13,374 $13,3742 $0 506,267 $73,371 $0 $126,567 $102,763 $82,300 $14,875 $28,2483 $0 503,736 $75,572 $0 $125,934 $97,687 $87,376 $16,443 $44,6914 $0 501,217 $77,839 $0 $100,243 $92,298 $92,765 ($6,980) $37,7115 $0 498,711 $80,174 $5,137 $99,742 $86,576 $98,486 ($10,283) $27,4276 $0 496,217 $82,579 $5,111 $99,243 $80,502 $104,561 ($8,351) $19,0767 $0 493,736 $85,057 $5,085 $74,060 $74,053 $111,010 ($31,031) ($11,955)8 $0 491,268 $87,608 $5,060 $73,690 $67,206 $117,857 ($28,824) ($40,779)9 $0 488,811 $90,237 $5,035 $73,322 $59,937 $125,126 ($26,539) ($67,319)10 $0 486,367 $92,944 $5,010 $48,637 $52,219 $132,843 ($48,492) ($115,811)11 $0 483,935 $95,732 $4,985 $48,394 $44,026 $141,037 ($45,922) ($161,732)12 $0 481,516 $98,604 $4,960 $48,152 $35,327 $149,736 ($43,267) ($204,999)13 $0 479,108 $101,562 $4,935 $23,955 $26,092 $158,971 ($64,480) ($269,479)14 $0 476,713 $104,609 $4,910 $23,836 $16,287 $168,776 ($61,528) ($331,008)15 $0 474,329 $107,747 $4,886 $23,716 $5,877 $179,186 ($58,485) ($389,492)

Totals: 7,370,743 $1,324,867 $55,112 $1,116,694 $948,392 $1,827,549 ($389,492) ($1,422,047)Net Present Value (NPV)

Photovoltaic System 100% Financing - 15 year

12.32

($254,550)


PVWatts: Monthly PV Performance Data Rooftop ArrayRequested Location: 400 N Lafayette St., Ventnor City, NJLocation: ATLANTIC CITY, NJLat (deg N): 39.45Long (deg W): 74.57Elev (m): 20DC System Size (kW): 212.88Module Type: StandardArray Type: Fixed (roof mount)Array Tilt (deg): 10Array Azimuth (deg): 135System Losses: 14Invert Efficiency: 96DC to AC Size Ratio: 1.1Average Cost of Electricity 0.12Initial Cost 2.6Cost of Electricity Generate 0.13

MonthAC System Output(kWh)

Solar Radiation

(kWh/m^2/day)

Plane of Array Irradiance (W/m^2)

DC array Output (kWh) Value ($)

1 13,742 2.44 75.68 14,455 1649.072 16,242 3.19 89.41 17,040 1949.033 22,943 4.20 130.21 24,008 2,753.114 26,314 5.11 153.33 27,533 3,157.685 30,160 5.79 179.40 31,524 3,619.156 29,658 6.11 183.38 31,028 3,558.967 29,761 6.01 186.45 31,121 3,571.308 27,327 5.47 169.66 28,582 3,279.239 23,292 4.74 142.06 24,376 2,795.00

10 18,925 3.64 112.78 19,843 2270.9711 13,324 2.54 76.20 14,030 1598.8912 11,623 2.11 65.53 12,272 1394.81

Total 263,310 51.36 1564.07 275,811 31597.2


PVWatts: Monthly PV Performance Data Parking Lot ArrayRequested Location: 400 N Lafayette St., Ventnor City, NJLocation: ATLANTIC CITY, NJLat (deg N): 39.45Long (deg W): 74.57Elev (m): 20DC System Size (kW): 199.2Module Type: StandardArray Type: Fixed (open rack)Array Tilt (deg): 7.5Array Azimuth (deg): 135System Losses: 14Invert Efficiency: 96DC to AC Size Ratio: 1.1Average Cost of Electricity 0.12Initial Cost 2.6Cost of Electricity Generate 0.13

MonthAC System Output(kWh)

Solar Radiation

(kWh/m^2/day)

Plane of Array Irradiance (W/m^2)

DC array Output (kWh) Value ($)

1 12,425 2.36 73.14 13,078 1,490.992 14,901 3.12 87.33 15,637 1,788.113 21,327 4.15 128.52 22,319 2,559.234 24,688 5.08 152.45 25,830 2,962.585 28,458 5.78 179.29 29,742 3,414.946 28,078 6.12 183.61 29,371 3,369.357 28,162 6.01 186.46 29,445 3,379.498 25,735 5.45 168.84 26,915 3,088.259 21,747 4.68 140.42 22,760 2,609.64

10 17,423 3.56 110.25 18,272 2,090.7411 12,086 2.46 73.82 12,735 1,450.3812 10,470 2.04 63.21 11,065 1,256.44

Total 245,501 50.81 1547.36 257,169 29460.14



APPENDIX G

The ESP Calculator TM

Toll Free : 1-800-747-9627 or (905) 791-1493 Energy Savings Payback CalculatorProject Description Ventnor City Educational ComplexDate 29-Jul-15

Data Entry QTY kVA15304575

112.5150225300

1 5007501000150020007.5

Available Full Load kW 500Average kVA (calc) 500equipment operating hrs/ day 14equipment operating days/yr 180 Calc Load kW Calc Annual kWhLoad during normal operating hours 60% 300 756,000 Load outside operating hours 10% 50 312,000

Total Annual Load kWh: 1,068,000 Annual Cost to Operate Load OnlykWh rate 0.140$ Annual Consumption: 149,520$ demand rate ($/kW/mo) ex. $10.00 $0.00 Annual Demand: -$

Total Cost to run load 149,520$

Annual Cost of Status Quo Transformer Losses & Associated Air Conditioning (A/C) burdenNameplate Linear efficiency (normal op hrs) 96.0% % electronics or current THD 10.0%Calculated operating efficiency 95.6%Transformer kW Losses (Normal Operation) 13.8 kWStatus quo Efficiency (Outside op. hrs) 94.0%Transformer kW Losses (Outside op. hrs) 3.2 kWAnnual addititional kWh from transformers 54,710 kWhAnnual Cost of Transformer Losses 7,659$

A/C System Performance (kW/ton) - Additional Tons of Cooling (on peak) - tonsAnnual addititional kWh from A/C - kWhAnnual Cost of Associated A/C -$

Summary with Status Quo TransformerAnnual Cost of feeding Building Load 149,520$ Annual Cost of Transformer Losses 7,659$ Annual Cost of Associated A/C -$ Electrical Bill (Status Quo Transformer) 157,179$

IMPORTANT: By using the ESP Calculator™, you are agreeing the TERMS OF USE section on page 3Powersmiths International Corp. is a licensed user. Content subject to change without noticePage 1 of 3 © Power Quality Institute 1998-2007, All rights reserved doc#807-000440-110-A05 17-Jan-09

Transformers on Project


Toll Free : 1-800-747-9627 or (905) 791-1493 Energy Savings Payback Calculator

Using Powersmiths instead of status quo transformersPowersmiths Efficiency (Normal Operation) 98.6%Powersmiths kW Losses (Normal Operation) 4.3 kWPowersmiths Efficiency (Outside op. hrs) 97.6%Transformer kW Losses (Outside op. hrs) 1.2 kWAnnual addititional kWh from transformers 18,406 kWhAnnual Cost of Powersmiths Losses 2,577$

Additional Tons of Cooling (on peak) - tons Annual addititional kWh from A/C - kWhAnnual Cost of Associated A/C -$

Comparing Status Quo & PowersmithsStatus Quo Powersmiths

Annual Cost of feeding Building Load 149,520$ 149,520$ Annual Cost of Transformer Losses 7,659$ 2,577$ Annual Cost of Associated A/C -$ -$ ReductionAnnual estimated Electrical Bill 157,179$ 152,097$ 3%

Peak kW reduction (normal op hours) 9.5 kWAnnual kWh reduction 36,303 kWhReduction in Air Conditioning Load (on peak) - tons

Cost Analysis (calc)

Energy Cost Escalation (above inflation) 2.0%

Annual Power Quality Benefit -$

AnnualOperating Cost 20 years 32 years

Status Quo Transformers $7,659 $227,629 $461,901Powersmiths Transformers $2,577 $76,583 $155,401Savings with Powersmiths $5,082 $151,046 $306,501

Cost CostPowersmiths Transformers $47,000Status Quo Transformers $0

Payback on total cost 9.25 years current kWh rate:Cost of Energy Savings 0.040$ /kWh $0.140Cost - Benefit Ratio 3.5 times less to save a kWh than to buy a kWh

Leasing Option 60 Month Term 48 Month Term 36 Month TermTotal Annual Leasing Payments $11,883 $14,495 $18,443Net Annual Cost with savings $6,801 $9,412 $13,360

Summary of Environmental Benefits

27 tons of CO2 5 Acres trees planted87 tons of Coal 4 Car Emissions

210 kgs of SO2 4 homes heated90 kgs of NOx

IMPORTANT: By using the ESP Calculator™, you are agreeing the TERMS OF USE section on page 3Powersmiths International Corp. is a licensed user. Content subject to change without noticePage 2 of 3 © Power Quality Institute 1998-2007, All rights reserved doc#807-000440-110-A05 17-Jan-09

Life Cycle Operating Cost & Savings

Annual Reduction in Greenhouse Gases (per EPA) Equivalence


Toll Free : 1-800-747-9627 or (905) 791-1493 Energy Savings Payback CalculatorStatus Quo Transformer (Normal Operation)Enter the average efficiency of the transformers. While NEMA TP1 is legislated minimum efficiency, it only applies at a single 35% load point, and under ideal linear load profile. Since most transformers are much less loaded than 35%, be sure to use lower efficiency to reflect load level.Status Quo Transformer (Outside Op. hours)Transformer efficiency is typically lower than normal when lightly loaded (86-89% when 10-15% loaded for most sizes) % electronics or Current THDIEEE Std 1100 and other industry references document transformer losses can more than double when feeding electronicswhen installled compared to ideal linear load in a manufacturer's factory test.Transformer Operating LossesTransformer Losses = kW load/net efficiency - kW load. A/C Performance (kW/ton)Varies widely depending on age and technology of cooling system. As low as 0.5 to over 2kW/ton (1.25-1.5 is often tp)Unlike most substation transformers that are vented to the exterior, most building distribution transformers are ventilated within the building, and their heat losses therefore add to the cooling load.Powersmiths Efficiency (Normal Operation) & (Outside Op. hours)Available on Powersmiths product data sheetEnergy Cost escalation (above inflation)

It is well recognized that energy rates are increasing much faster than inflation. Enter the % over inflationAnnual Power Quality BenefitSavings attributable to reduced downtime, equipment locks & failures associated with poor power qualityCostCost of transformers. Enter dollar figure for transformers under consideration. If the interest is to look at the justification for replacing existing transformers, enter $0 in the conventional transformer cost field.Energy Operating Cost Energy OPERATING COST (normal op) = (transformer + cooling) kW losses x kWh rate x hrs/day x days/yr + demand chargeDemand charge is not included in the calculation of losses outside normal hours to be conservative.Return on Investment (ROI)ROI on Incremental Cost is based on dividing the Incremental Investment in Powersmiths by the Annual SavingsROI on Total Transformer Cost is based on dividing the Total Transformer Cost by the Annual SavingsCost of Energy SavingsIn its simplest form, the cost of energy savings represents the cost to savea kWh as opposed to paying for it according to the prevailing kWh rate.

The equation is: Cost of Energy Savings = (Incremental Product Cost / Lifetime kWh saved)LeasingPowersmiths Leasing has many benefits, including avoiding the use of capital, offsetting monthly leasing payment withthe reduction in monthly energy bill from using PowersmithsEnvironmental BenefitsConversion rates from kWh to emission reduction and equivalent benefits are published by the EPA, and reflect environmental benefits derived from reduced emissions associated with reduced power generation.TERMS OF USEPower Quality Institute has used its best efforts in developing the ESP Calculator ™ with the intent of providing an easyto use and useful calculation tool. However, data entered and assumptions made may not accurately reflect all variablesthat apply in a given facility. The results are therefore estimates only and may differ from actual measurements.The user is responsible for evaluating the suitability and accuracy of the ESP Calculator ™. The Power Quality Instituteand Powersmiths International Corp. make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy orcompleteness of the estimates generated by the ESP Calculator ™ and specifically disclaim any implied warranties ofmerchantability or fitness for any particular purpose and shall in no event be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damage, including, but not limited to special, incidental, consequential or other damages.Page 3 of 3 © Power Quality Institute 1998-2007, All rights reserved doc#807-000440-110-A05 17-Jan-09

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM

Documents

Transcript of LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM