This article was downloaded by:[G e issler, P . Wenze l][G e issler, P . Wenze l]

On: 27 March 2007Access De ta ils: [subscription number 772444224]Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wa les Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House , 37-41 Mortimer S tree t, London W1T 3JH , UK

Journa l of E astern A frican S tudiesPublica tion de ta ils, including instructions for authors and subscription informa tion:http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t770239509

Life Seen: Touch and V ision in the Making of Sex inWestern Kenya

To cite this Article: , 'Life Seen: Touch and V ision in the Making of Sex in WesternKenya', Journa l of E astern A frican S tudies, 1:1, 123 - 149xxxx:journa l To link to this article: D OI: 10.1080/17531050701218924URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17531050701218924

Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf

This article maybe used for research, teaching and priva te study purposes. Any substantia l or systema tic reproduction,re-distribution, re-se lling, loan or sub-licensing, systema tic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expresslyforbidden.

The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representa tion tha t the contents will becomple te or accura te or up to da te . The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should beindependently verified with primary sources. The publisher sha ll not be liable for any loss, actions, cla ims, proceedings,demand or costs or damages wha tsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with orarising out of the use of this ma teria l.

© Taylor and Francis 2007

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

Life Seen:1 Touch and Vision in the Makingof Sex in Western Kenya

P. WENZEL GEISSLER* & RUTH J. PRINCE***London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine & **Institute of Anthropology & Institute for HealthResearch and Development, University of Copenhagen

ABSTRACT This article is part of a project about transformations of relatedness among the Luo ofwestern Kenya, which we examine by observing, in the everyday life of one village, concrete practicesthat constitute and negotiate material contact. In short, villagers understand physical touch andassociated forms of material contact as practices that momentarily merge persons or their bodies bysharing substance. Such moments of merging release creative or transformative force, with its attendantambiguity. To understand this link between merging and emergence, the Dholuo term riwo, is helpful. Itcan designate moments of ‘coming together, mixing, merging’ across all spheres of everyday life. Riwo iscentral to concerns with how things should be done, in everyday and in ritual situations, in order tosustain the order of life, commonly referred to as chike, which directs the ‘growth’ (dongruok) of theliving. Since there is, in these times of death and confusion, little agreement among the villagers abouthow the continuity of life can be maintained, and which order should be created or restored, moments ofphysical contact (or its absence) are nodes around which the present predicament is debated, andalternative visions of past and future are produced. The present paper looks at one aspect of thesedebates: bodily intercourse between woman and man. We discuss how this practice, which among Luotends to be associated with darkness and the absence of words, is increasingly drawn into the light ofdiscourses ! such as Christian, Traditionalist, medical and pornographic ! which have emerged inwestern Kenya at different times during the past century, and which in different ways constitute ‘sex’ asa distinctive imagination of intercourse.

Everyday life in the western Kenyan village of Uhero is marked by a pervasive, yet highlyimplicit, concern with touch.2 JoUhero, the ‘people of Uhero’, touch other people’s bodieswith great care, paying respect to generational and generative relationships. Even gettingin touch with the traces ! intentional and unintentional ! of other people ! living anddead, human or non-human ! and indeed with the traces of other’s touches, such as forexample parental sexual acts, is a matter of great consideration. This preoccupation isfollowed with some discretion, but very persistently, and after some time of fieldwork itbecomes visible as a key theme that runs through everyday life, from cooking and eatingto building and farming, from nurturing children to burying the deceased. It even cutsacross the economic and religious lines that divide the village.3 Although this is rarelymade explicit as a ‘cultural model’, as in ‘We Luo are very concerned with touch’, it can be

Correspondence Addresses : Paul Wenzel Geissler, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University ofLondon, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. E-mail: wenzel.geissler@lshtm.ac.uk; Ruth Prince, Institute ofAnthropology, Copenhagen University, Oster Farimagsgade 5, opgang E, 1353 Kobenhaven K, Denmark. E-mail:ruthprince@gmail.com

ISSN 1753-1055 Print/1753-1063 Online/07/010123!27 # 2007 Taylor & FrancisDOI: 10.1080/17531050701218924

Journal of Eastern African StudiesVol. 1, No. 1, 123!149, March 2007

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

Figure 1. Life Seen! , front and back cover (September 2001)

124P.

W.Geissler

&R.J.Prin

ce

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

understood with reference to the concept of riwo, ‘mixing’ or ‘coming together’, a Dholuoverb describing practices across various dimensions of everyday life that momentarilymerge persons or their bodies by sharing substance. Such moments of merging releasecreative or transformative capacity, which can engender ‘growth’ (dongruok). In a sense,all creativity and all transformation rely upon these effects of touch; merging is thecondition of emergence. This potential makes touch also highly ambiguous: it can makelife as well as destroy it.

Touch in this sense is central to JoUhero’s concerns with how things should be done, ineveryday and in ritual situations, to sustain what some JoUhero refer to as the ‘order oflife’ or ‘custom’ (chike), and the ‘growth’ that is its consequence. However, Uhero is in anarea with growing economic disparities, expanding religious divisions, and with very highrates of sickness and death, presumably due to HIV/AIDS,4 and there is little agreementamong the villagers about how the continuity of life can be maintained and what ordershould be created or restored. In these times of death and confusion, moments of touchare the nodes around which the present condition is debated and alternative visions ofpast and future are produced. This paper looks at one aspect of these debates: sleepingwith the other, bodily intercourse between woman and man ! a vital mode of touchingthe other body, and a particularly strained form of bodily contact in these days of death.

East Africanists have noted that bodily intercourse is the core of social ethics.5 Ourexperiences in Uhero are in agreement with these representations. However, studyingintercourse in Eastern Africa, we should not consider ‘sex’ as a universal, a fact of nature,but instead regard it as one particular discourse about intercourse, which ! in its shiftingmanifestations and local forms ! is to be studied in itself and in relation to other possibleimaginations and practices of intercourse. Moreover, we should not assume thehomogeneity and stability of any particular ‘culture’ of intercourse, but instead explorethe different co-present ‘moral regimes’6 of intercourse in a given society and attempt totrace how ‘sex’ is made and remade under locally specific circumstances.

This paper examines such different imaginations and discourses about bodilyintercourse in Uhero, and the concepts of person and relatedness that underlie them.The aim is to retrace how ‘sex’ has become known as an object of discursive reflection andas the source of a specific ‘modern’, subjectivity.7 After introducing the subject with thecase of Odhis, a young man whose confusion about matters of love occupied JoUheroduring our fieldwork, the first part of the paper explores two main orientations towardsintercourse, which JoUhero refer to as respectively ‘Traditional’ and ‘Christian’, or withmore specific connotations: ‘Earthly’ and ‘Saved’. While these are locally described asmutually exclusive opposites, they are increasingly interdependent, each constituted withreference to the other and together delineating a new discourse on ‘sex’ as a specific, maybe‘modern’, conceptualisation of intercourse. Having thus sketched the field, in whichintercourse is located in contemporary village life, the second part of the paper looks attwo more recent discourses: AIDS-awareness and pornography. These innovations expand(in Foucault’s terms) the ongoing production of a discourse about sex and make bodilyintercourse an object of medical reflection and of commoditisation. Despite some obviousmodifications that each of them entails, they extend the lines drawn by Christiandiscourse, making sex an object of individual moral responsibility. Sex in this sensecontrasts with an understanding of intercourse as riwo ! ‘merging-through-sharing’.However, the departure from riwo that this gradual construction of ‘sex’ in Uhero evokesdoes not necessarily imply an evolutionary transition from supposedly authentic, ‘African’

Life Seen 125

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

intercourse to late modern ‘sex’. Rather, the new knowledge, the new availabilityof different conceptualisations ! and of new conceptualisations of difference !enables new imaginations and practices, and creates confusion, as the following caseillustrates.

Odhis’ Dreams

Odhiambo (b. 1975), called Odhis, worked for a local development initiative and lived inMuthurwa ‘shopping centre’ (a conglomerate of rented accommodation and shops with98 inhabitants in 2001, named after an estate in Nairobi in which many migrant Luorailway workers lived) near the tarmac road which demarcates the administrative area ofUhero village. In the beginning of 2001, Odhis became thin and worried, as he wasstruggling to find his way between two conflicting love relationships. He had had, since1997, a relation with Christine, a girl of his age and daughter of a farmer from Uhero; inlate 2000 she gave birth to a girl and the child’s strikingly beautiful traits left little doubtconcerning Odhis’ paternity. Then there was Beatrice, the slightly older, secondary schooleducated daughter of a teacher, whom he had been going out with for a while. The birthof Odhis’ daughter brought the tension between him and his girlfriends to a head.Initially, Odhis denied paternity and gave JoUhero food for debate by taking an advancepayment and unpaid leave from his job and disappearing with Beatrice to town, allegedlyusing his savings for a hotel and other pleasures of townlife. When he returned he wasbroke, but proudly wearing the fashionable cap of the late Luo political leader Odinga.When we, among others whom he came to for support, asked him why he denied his tiesto Christine and insisted on going out with Beatrice, he responded to our concerns with adefiant: ‘I love her’, and his friends added: ‘He wants an educated, modern girl!’ Odhis’obstinate clinging to Beatrice bewildered JoUhero. People gossiped about the love-potions, produced from unmentionable ingredients and prepared by medicine-men inthe city, that Beatrice had administered to him. When Odhis, who had already beenweakened by his worries (combined with the loss of employment and regular meals), fellseriously ill and refused to speak to anybody, people attributed this to the lethal effects ofthese medicines.

Odhis’ behaviour and his excursions with Beatrice as well as her monetary demands onhim, the talk about an educated girl to show off with, and the particular emphasis, in thiscontext, on love-potions, which according to older JoUhero had not been common in thepast,8 points to a peculiar aspect of this relationship. Both partners, as well as onlookersspeculating about the events, seemed to regard the two people involved and the bondbetween them as something object-like, to be had or made and used, and as somethingthat could be shaped according to individual wills and dreams; and it was clearly Odhis’intention to affirm his autonomy in this matter. Odhis’ ties to Christine were of anothertemper: she had been his first girlfriend and their bond was evident only in the child, and,at least at this stage, not negotiated as object of dream or fancy, nor made a topic of muchpublic speculation. Most JoUhero seemed to acknowledge the self-evident validity of thelatter relation, and only a few supported Odhis’ extravagant choices. His mates fromneighbouring rooms in the rented house at Muthurwa shared many of his dreams andaspirations and understood well the problem of conflicting girlfriends. Like Odhis, severalof them had gone ‘touring’ to town with a girlfriend. However, they joked about hisuntenable denial of fatherhood and recommended that he accepted the mother of his

126 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

child as wife and took care of his family, without necessarily abandoning his less virtuousdreams and desires. One of them even teasingly encouraged the otherwise shy Odhis totry to have both at once, as one of the Muthurwa boys, inspired by pornographic videos,had allegedly tried with his girlfriends (in vain, according to the girls). Others took, halfjokingly, a ‘traditional’ stance and recommended in jest that he married and built a housefor each of the girls (knowing well that he scarcely could afford to build a house for onewife). While she was concerned with his deteriorating health, Nell, Odhis’ slightly older‘sister’, also joked: ‘he is dreaming of the ‘Bold and the Beautiful’!’, a television soap operathat had that had procured younger JoUhero with imaginations of sexual confusion sincethe early 1990s. Despite her misgivings, she eventually negotiated the conflict, talking toeverybody concerned, including the girls’ parents.

Odhis’ mother, who lived in his ‘father’s’ homestead in a nearby village, was in favourof Christine, whom she hoped would move into their home and bring her grandchildrenas well as company and assistance. Odhis was born before his mother had married his‘father’, and since Odhis was her only surviving child, his mother’s place in her husband’shome was precarious.9 Together with her concern about her only daughter-in-law’sfertility, ‘respect’ (luor) was a crucial issue for Odhis’ mother: she regarded Christine as arespectful girl, wishing for proper relations to her child’s father and his people. Odhis’‘father’, a retired railway man, who, as his ‘son’ put it, had ‘become a born-againTraditionalist when he returned to the village’, also stressed that Christine’s home was onethat honoured ‘Luo Tradition’, whereas Beatrice’s educated parents had left the Luo ways.His advice did not really count for much on this occasion; it was highly unusual that hegot involved at all in the debate, and that he seemed to accept Odhis’ belonging to hishome; maybe this was because he was seriously ill and only had one other child. Odhis’other ‘mother’ (his mother’s sister) in Uhero, Mercy Ogumba, with whom Odhis hadlived as a schoolboy, would usually have regarded a good Christian background and somewealth and education as main criteria for choosing a spouse. Yet, on this occasion, evenshe advised him to marry Christine : ‘this child is his, why can he not stick to it?’Concerning the teacher’s daughter, Beatrice, she alluded to the rumours that she wasnot menstruating, that she had ‘bad morals’ and that she might even be ill. Otherwomen similarly pointed out that Odhis’ and Christine’s blood was ‘in agreement’(rembgi owinjore) ! hence the child. The other girl’s blood, by contrast, was ‘different’(rembgi opogore): ‘They may agree in their hearts [giwinjore e chunye], but their blood . . .?!’ One added jokingly, and in English: ‘Odhis and Beatrice, they are in love!’ Thesewomen had no qualms about Odhis sleeping with different girlfriends, but they urgedhim to realise which one his blood agreed with and to acknowledge the fruit of theirmerged blood.

Facing this criticism and rising monetary demands from Beatrice, Odhis kept quiet andrefused to engage with his critics, even after he had overcome his sickness. He continuedto meet Beatrice when he could find the necessary resources, which became increasinglyrare. The common-sense argument of the child was irreconcilable with Odhis’ love, andhis dream of a well-groomed, smart girl. The situation seemed in a deadlock untilChristine took a decisive step and moved with her little daughter into Odhis’ one-roomflat, rearranged the furniture in a manner appropriate for a young family, including twoAIDS education posters, and declared the matter to be settled. Odhis’ mother encouragedher to hold out, and even her parents declared ! ignoring that no bridewealth had beenbrought ! that they would regard their daughter married if he did not send her back

Life Seen 127

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

within days. Odhis complained to his friends, threatened to escape into the army andslept out for a couple of days, but eventually he came back home. Christine set up a littleshop selling food and medicines with the final payments from Odhis’ employment, andOdhis supported this enterprise by bringing the merchandise from the market town.When Christine’s father died, shortly thereafter, he struggled to bring the required firstwedding gifts (ayie, ‘I accept’) to Christine’s home before the father was interred, so as toformalise their marriage. When his own father died a few months later, Christineparticipated in the ceremonies as his wife. However, when she was asked after the funeralto stay on in her mother-in-law’s home, she declined and before the end of the officialmourning period, she returned to her shop and room.

Odhis’ case presents us with an utterly bewildered young man, momentarily paralysedby contradictory imaginations and options, increasingly motionless amongst women’smoves. The story of him and ‘his’ girls, as it was narrated by himself and the relatives andneighbours around him, illustrates the confusion created by different connotations of thebodily union: visions of romantic town love, ‘sexy’ girls and wealthy men confrontimaginations of virtue of various kinds, such as embodied in the ‘rural girl’ or the‘Christian maid’, and seem eventually to be overruled by the unequivocal force ofmotherhood, and a tie of the blood, as well as by the joint pressure of different interestswithin the village community. The case also shows that these different ideas aboutbodily love, in as much as they seem to exclude one another, mix and merge as theyare employed by different people, thus contributing to the overall confusion. Odhis’very Christian, Saved aunt, whose ideology should have insisted upon premarital chastityand whose general orientation would have recommended an educated daughter-in-law,succumbed to the facts and advised that Odhis should stick to the woman whohad proven her fertility, much in agreement with Odhis’ bodily mother’s morekinship-centred view. In her argument, Christian moral concerns with the other girl’svirtues and epidemiological worries were mixed with questions of reproductive capacity,which she shared with many others. The outcome of the case ! as for the moment !also shows how a matrifocal attitude prevails ! or an emphasis on the tie betweenmother and father, created by their child ! that gets the upper hand over the father’saspirations.

Moreover, the case shows in its development that the variety of ideas about sexualityand attachment does not lead to any predictable outcome. In Odhis’ story, the jointdecision of most of the women made Odhis stick to his new family, and he even tookbridewealth to his father-in-laws home to seal the relation (which few of his age mates inMuthurwa had done). Yet, despite this seemingly customary outcome, he and Christinecontinue to reside in the roadside settlement outside the village, partly because of Odhis’unclear position in his ‘fathers’ home, but mainly because Christine did not wish toadhere to customary practices after the burial of Odhis’ father, and maybe because she onthe whole preferred a life as an independent shopkeeper assisted by a husband to that of arural wife digging her fields under the eyes of her mother-in-law. Odhis consented totheir continued residence in town, and instead of following custom and building his wifea house in his father’s home, he aimed to build ‘a straight home’ according to custom, buton his own, bought land.10 In other words, new ideas about the ties between women andmen and about bodily intercourse open debates and create confusion and newopportunities, but they do not produce unequivocal outcomes. With this caveat, let us

128 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

now turn to these changing discourses about intercourse and explore the background ofOdhis’ dreams.

Earthly Ethics and Christian Morality

(i) Riwo:Touch and Transformation

A key to JoUhero’s understanding of bodily intercourse is the verb riwo. According toDholuo dictionaries, riwo means to mix, merge, join, unite, be together and collaborate.Riwo also can mean ‘cross’ or ‘step over’, possibly suggesting an association betweenmerging, and transitions and liminality (or deriving from different etymological roots).In everyday speech, it is the most common verb for intercourse, and it also designates arange of other forms of material contact: to share food (riwo chiemo (food) or riwo lwedo(one’s hands, by eating from one plate); conversation (riwo weche (words) or riwo ji(people)); to join a dance (riwore e miel); to share beer (riwo kong’o) or liquor (riwochang’aa); to share a common grandfather (riwo kwaru) or a kinship bond (riwo wat); toreunite, through shared food and medicine (riwo gi manyasi), people that disturbed theorder of everyday life (see below); or to plant and harvest together (riwore waguru (work-group) or riwo tich (work) or riwo lowo (earth)). All these activities are substantial butalways momentary, associated with a particular act. They relate the creation of substantialbonds between one and an other person to transformative processes such as conception,cooking and fermentation, intoxication and digestion, plant and animal growth, healingand rain. Riwo thus designates contingent events in the double meaning of the word,implying touch and occurring incidentally, uncontrolled by a will; it is these qualities thatenable the momentary consubstantiality between one and other to transform and create.The experience of contingent events such as birth and death, but also of smaller everydayevents such as growth and transformation in agriculture and food preparation, is in thisway related to moments of touch between humans. Instead of answering the questionwhy life exists and perpetuates itself with reference to an external subjectivity, the plannedaction of God or scientific Nature, the awe for the living is here directed towards thetranscendent capacity of the contingent event between one and other. ‘Sharing’, ascaptured by the term riwo, designates a momentary, ambiguous moment of simultaneousunion and differentiation; the moment of sharing marks two people as different, or elsetheir sharing would not make sense, and it makes them one.

It is in terms of these meanings of riwo that Luo concepts of sociality and personhoodmust be understood. Riwo is sharing the substance of the other, or sharing substancewith him ! amoment ofmutual complementation. In this logic, the difference between oneand the other person implies incompleteness, as one is constituted by the other which he isnot (most evidently in the case of man and woman), and this incompleteness contains acreative potential, which is released when it is momentarily transcended ! when onetouches the other. The gendered complementation that occurs in bodily intercourse is animportant case of such creative complementation, but other forms of genderedcomplementation (labour, planting, cooking, commensality, building, ritual) are equallynecessary to maintain creativity and sociality. The creative capacity of touch in this riwosense is ambiguous ! transformations can be towards growth and life, but also towardsdecay and death, and often one implies the other. Therefore, concerns about how to get intouch in the rightway arevital among JoUhero, anddebates anddisagreements are common.

Life Seen 129

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

(ii) Riwruok: Nearness outside Intentionality

While the principle of riwo is omnipresent in everyday practice and conversations aboutit, bodily intercourse itself (riwruok, n.) is not usually spoken about in such termsbetween people who respect each other (especially parents and children).11 Theconstitution of intercourse as an object of discourse is thus restricted. So, too, are othermodalities of bringing the act of intercourse into representation.12 Prohibitions regarding(looking at) nakedness are related to this silence surrounding the bodily union. The otherbody and intercourse should not be made objects of speech or of gaze.13 Seeing theprivate parts of somebody is dangerous: the worst of a mother’s curses is to show herprivate parts to her son.

It seems strange that this power of nakedness should exist in a place where peopledressed scantily (in the sense of hiding the skin) until three generations ago.14 What is atissue, however, is not nakedness itself, but a specific kind of gaze ! looking at the otherbody, especially within particular relations. No deadly risks are involved when men andwomen bathe at some distance but within potential sight of each other. In sensitivesituations, however, even a mental image of the other’s body or, rather, of intercourse canbe detrimental: when a couple moves into a new house, for example, they sneak into it atnight so that nobody could know (or imagine) how they entered and performed theintercourse required on this occasion. The same effort to prevent intercourse andthe naked other from becoming objects of representation and intentionality is evident inthe proscription against touching the other body with one’s hands: little girls caring forsiblings are already taught that touching a boy’s penis will make it wither, young womenare warned that touching their boyfriend’s or husband’s may kill him. Young JoUheroshare this aversion to intentional hand contact, and insist that intercourse ought to takeplace in darkness; girls disliked the idea of touching the boys genitals, and boys tended toagree ‘that is out’.15

These avoidances aim at preventing intentional contact with the other’s private parts.If, as Emmanuel Levinas suggests in his post-phenomenological writings, intentionality ispremised upon one’s identification with the other and the appropriation of the other,then the avoidance, in JoUhero’s dealings with intercourse, of speech, gaze and the hand astools of intention acknowledges the radical otherness of the other in the moment ofbodily union. Instead of assuming identity with the other, and of envisaging sex as anexchange of pleasures between equal agents, such a view acknowledges the absolutedifference between one and another human, especially woman and man, as theprecondition of the bodily encounter and of creation, which results from the momentarytranscendence of difference. Clad in darkness, the touch of intercourse is, like a sacredmoment, kept beyond representation. The nakedness that it protects is not a thing thatoffends or pleases the viewer, but the vulnerability of one human facing the other asirreconcilably different, in Levinas sense of the ‘nakedness’ of the face that creates thehuman relation beyond or before an intentional act and before subjectivity.16 Themaxims and practices derived from the ethics of riwo express respect for the generativepower of complementation, of the moment of difference being brought into touch, whichis conceptualised less as an act (of one agent upon the other) than as an event (betweenthem). This is the core of the notion of what in English, somewhat misleadingly, is called‘respect’, luor, a central concept in JoUhero’s ethical debates. In this sense ! and notprimarily in the sense of seniority or authority ! the notion of East African ‘respect

130 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

cultures’ is apt.17 This respect is an awe for the possibility of the human relation, and itsunpredictable capacity.

(iii) Dongruok and Chira: Growth and Blockage

The place of intercourse and of riwo in Uhero must be further situated in the context ofdongruok (‘growth’) ! the ultimate aim of sociality ! and of chira, the illness thatembodies the opposite of growth: wasting, childlessness, death. To follow chike ! thecustomary ways of performing everyday practices from planting to cooking, building tointercourse, merging the right substances in the right order ! opens the way (yawo yo) fordongruok and continuous transformations. The chike according to which particularpractices (kwer, pl. kweche) must be ordered are not so much ‘rules’ that prescribe orproscribe specific actions ! although they more recently have been reified in such a way(see below). Rather, they are a shared vision of the order of life that allows theparticipants of social life to harmonise their practices and to speculate about possibleviolations of these principles, if an illness or a misfortune has affected one of them.

Chike do not aim at forbidding or confining bodily intercourse, but on the contrary,because of the omnipresence of significant moments of merging in the everyday andbecause of the connections made between different kinds of riwo in ritual and mundanepractices, the creative principle of the bodily union is woven into every social practice andevoked in every meal. The rules do not serve to limit its potential, but to proliferate it.

Growth, dongruok, can be blocked by some mix up of the right sequence of practices.Chira is the bodily manifestation of such blockage as child-death or (increasinglycommonly) as wasting illness, diarrhoea and death. Chira strikes because the temporalorder of things, or their directionality, is confused, preventing the steady downward flowof life. Not sleeping with someone may in this logic be as dangerous as doing so,depending upon the appropriate sequence. Chira and dongruok are the two faces of theambivalent potentiality of riwo that demarcate the potentialities of human touch.

This riwo perspective is in Uhero commonly referred to as ‘Earthly’, emphasising bothits association with the place and with its ancestral forces. According to it, intercourse isan important modality of touch, which as such is neither good nor bad, but necessary tomaintain the processes of life that lead to the constitution of persons and thereproduction of life. These ‘amoral’ ethics of riwo persist in the lives of JoUhero, butthey have not remained unaffected by the social transformations of the past century andthe diversification of discourses related to bodily intercourse that we examine below.18

The interplay of persistence and change within the ‘Earthly’ perspective can be seen in theambiguity of the concepts of chodo and luor and in the recent ‘Traditionalisation’ of Luochike, which we address in turn.

(iv) Chodo and Luor: Continuity and Change

If one looks at the everyday life of the girls sleeping in the house of Mary, a lady in her 90swho lives together with her grandchildren, the girls and young boys of her son’sneighbouring home, one is struck by the continuity of the amoral ethics of riwo. Jokesabout boyfriends’ visits are common and Mary does not prevent her granddaughters’nightly visitors, claiming that some of them even present her with tobacco inappreciation of her generosity. The girls, as well as the older boys of the bachelors’

Life Seen 131

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

house (simba) at the opposite end of the home, take pride in their adventures. So too, itseems, does Mary: she teases the girls, and, when she speaks about the past, recalls herown exploits with relish. Several of the girls have given birth to children, some deliveredby Mary herself; their fathers are not known to the family and they have joined thechildren of the grandmother’s hut. In spite of the material and educational problems theycause for their mothers, these fatherless children are less a moral issue than a proof ofwomanhood and progress in life, to judge by the girls’ pride. In some respects, then,Mary’s house resembles the siwindhe (the house of an old woman, unmarried girls andpre-adolescent boys in the Luo homestead of the past) described by old JoUhero as a placeof grandmotherly education on ethics, social life and the secrets of riwruok, as well as ofencounters between boys and girls.19 Little seems to have changed since the 1930s and1940s when observers noted ‘considerable intermingling’ between girls and boys anddescribed the practice of chodo, ‘incomplete penetration’ or ‘playing between the thighs’,that girls used to learn from elderly women so that they could ‘play’ with boys withoutgetting pregnant.20 In the absence of formal initiation, sexual experiences were and are amark of maturity and not primarily a moral concern in the sense of binary Christianmorality.

Yet, despite these continuities, Mary and other older women in Uhero point outdifferences between the girls of their past (themselves) and their granddaughters. Theyclaim that these days, limitations in terms of penetration and exogamy are all butforgotten and that their granddaughters do not listen to teachings about the playful chodoof the past. Then, girls’ ‘playing’ (tugo) with boys was sharply differentiated from‘marriage’ (kendo); it did not open gendered bodies to fertility and reproduction andtherefore was not associated with any of the concerns in the sense of kweche (see above)that surrounded married people’s intercourse. Today, by contrast, girls ‘play at marriage’(gitugo kendo): ‘getting pregnant in the grass’, moving in with men, calling it marriage,returning home, starting over again.21 These laments about changed mores ! particularlyof girls and women ! use the term chodo in its contemporary sense of ‘prostitution’.22

Between the times of Evans-Pritchard and the end of the century, pleasurable, amoral‘play’ has mutated to immoral ‘fornication’ and commodified ‘prostitution’.23 This is nota total transformation of meanings, but it is through these additional meanings that‘moral’ evaluations permeate speech and thinking about intercourse. The term chodo canno longer be employed in its older amoral sense; as soon as it is spoken, it is situated inthe grid of virtue and vice. Practices around Mary’s house and her defence of hergranddaughters’ right to play with the boys suggest the continuity of an amoralappreciation of intercourse in terms of riwo, but even in Mary’s discourse, what otherwiseappears (and understands itself to be) an unadulterated voice from the past registers thepresence of the ordering principle of sexual morality.

A second concept that JoUhero employ in their evaluation of changing mores is luor(‘respect’), which underwent a similar transformation. While the definition of chodoshifted from play to sin, luor changed from notions of mutual recognition and awe for thepowerful potential of substantial relations activated in touch, which we outlined above, tomeanings that are closer to the English sense of the word: hierarchy and obedience, self-discipline and respectability. Although Anglican bishops and young, authoritarianpoliticians sometimes instrumentalise luor in the latter sense for their political ends,present debates oscillate between these two meanings. If JoUhero lament that people (andagain, especially women) have no luor, they can be referring to their short skirts, their

132 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

sexual voracity and indiscriminate contact with men, or to their lack of generosity,compassion and kindness, or their lack of respect for a particular relation. The polyvalentdiscourses on the loss of luor, like those about the commonness of chodo, must be readnot as a way of telling us whether or not people sleep around more today than they did inthe past, but as a way of talking about the wider transformations that people haveexperienced during their lives: the constitution of a new, binary morality, associated to anew subjectivity and the production of objects this entails. This separation of subject andobject, and of agent and acted-upon, is taken for granted in western sociality (particularlyconcerning sexuality) but it is relatively new to Uhero and a challenge to people’sunderstandings of personhood and relatedness.

(v) Chike Luo: Return to the Modern Order or Progression to the Past?

The challenge to Earthly understandings of sociality is reflected in the tide of Luo‘Traditionalism’, which has accompanied the economic, political and epidemiologicalcrisis that engulfed Kenya and especially the Luo since the 1980s. Although this process ofcultural reification (which is beyond the scope of this paper24) understands itself as a‘return’ to Luo chike, it implies important changes regarding the ethics of riwo and therole of bodily intercourse. In their Traditionalist rendering, chike are fixed, written downand printed as prescriptive ‘Luo Rules’, bearing greater resemblance to the precepts of theChristian moralism that we will turn to below, than to the earlier polyvocal andretrospective debates about the transformative effects of riwo.25

In this process, chira is transformed from a misfortune that, due to confused orruptured social relations, affected the growth of a group through ill-health, child-death orinfertility, into an illness that sanctions individual rule-infringements. Whereas before ithad wider implications in relation to lineage and seniority, here chira becomes focused onthe act of bodily intercourse. David Parkin showed that chira emerged as a dominanttheme of Luo social life in the 1960s, and in particular among urban Luo (it appeared tohave been less important in rural sociality).26 He argued that the effects of labourmigration had challenged male control over their rural possessions, wives and kin, andthat chira, interpreted narrowly as breaches of rules of gender and age seniority, waselaborated and deployed to regain control, as well as to translate new economic resources,gained through urban labour, into power over land and family.

The strong emphasis on chira in rural Luoland forty years later can therefore beconsidered an aspect of the urbanisation of village life and imagination, whichcharacterises the 1990s return of urban Luo to the village. As part of this process, amoralist-Traditionalist discourse about female chastity, led by elderly men who oftenbecame Traditionalists after a long ‘modern’ life in the city, replaces an idiom of mutualrespect, interdependence and gender complementarity. Thereby it shifts the emphasistowards individual responsibility and morality, and to sex. A related shift implied by theTraditionalist ‘return’ concerns the conceptualisation of kwer. These efficacious, and thushighly sensitive, practices that make up chike are increasingly rendered as ‘taboos’,supported by an ethnographic tendency to (mis)interpret concerns with the power oftouch and substance as ‘prohibitions’, as rules to prevent merging rather than asmodalities to elicit its potentials.27

Given this marked Luo Traditionalism, it would be wrong to simply oppose ‘Earthlypractice’ to ‘sexual discourses’, as if the former was entirely implicit. The Earthly

Life Seen 133

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

imagination is increasingly made to produce its own discourse, of Tradition, which makesexplicit what before was implied in gestures and practices, and which speaks to the other,even more explicit, discourses that we will now turn to. Clear dichotomies exist onlywithin these discourses, such as when Traditionalists distance themselves from Christians,or vice versa, Saved Christians from Earthly people. In contrast most JoUhero seethemselves as Christians and as Earthly people, and straddle the resulting gapspragmatically. In other words: there is no underlying, unchanged ‘Luo’ notion ofintercourse in present day Uhero, against which discursive intrusions occur, but alandscape of fragments, which this analysis groups into different narratives, but which aretaken up or dropped less systematically in JoUhero’s everyday life. An important factor inthe proliferation and fragmentation of discursive options pertaining to intercourse wasundoubtedly the intrusion of Christian morality, to which we now turn.

(vi) Cleanness: Sex and Separation

Riwo describes moments of intercourse and other touch in which difference isencompassed by unity ! one person and another complementing each other ! and inwhich the continuity of sociality and life itself is produced. In contrast, the Christian,moralist discourse (in the sense of providing clear distinctions of good and evil) on ‘sex’in Uhero relies on categorical boundaries between persons and bodies, and many a debateamong JoUhero about sex is framed in terms of sin and pollution vis-a-vis chastity andcleanness (maler: ‘clean’, ‘bright’ and, in Christian language, ‘holy’). These debates placeEarthly practices of riwo in opposition to a Christian life of striving for cleanness (notleast from the material contaminations implied by riwo and the earth).

According to the Anglican Church Missionary Society’s (CMS) ‘Instructions toChristian Africans’, to which the Anglican Church of Kenya (ACK) still subscribes,marriage is the core of Christian life, and although Christian marriage is only entered intoby a minority of JoUhero, the morality underlying this document appears in most localdebates about intercourse.28 The purpose of marriage is here limited to procreation andto prevent men from ‘fornication’: ‘The Christian person must be able to control everydesire both of body or soul.’ Sex outside marriage (which includes polygyny) is sin: ‘Yourbody is the temple of God: keep it holy.’ Apart from its uncompromising moralism, theemphasis on intercourse is striking: sex (and the sexual body) is constituted as an isolatedobject of the imagination, separated from the wider productive relations of everyday life;and marriage is identified with the physical union, the control of which is central to theconstitution of a Christian person, the basic unit of Christian society. Talk about thesexual act is more overt here than in the Earthly ways, albeit in a negative light.Intercourse is made to speak, as sex, in Foucault’s sense of a modern, strategic discourse.

These Christian precepts are accompanied by puritan sensibilities about (particularlywomen’s) dress, which have been markers of conversion since the beginning of LuoChristianisation.29 Women’s hair should be covered and skirts long and double layered soas to prevent the thighs and their convergence to be seen; trousers are considered to beimmodest. The contrast between this Christian emphasis on concealment and theconcerns with nakedness, noted above, in the Earthly ways of riwo points to the differencebetween the darkness of bodily mixing and the hiding and separation of Christianmorality. The former concern could be said to be about protecting a vital instant of unityfrom the separating force that gaze, representation and objectification entail; the latter

134 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

concern is about excluding or containing the dangerous potential, within the individualperson, of being joined with the other; it protects the separateness of the individual.

In Uhero, this moral discourse finds its clearest expression among the Saved or ‘born-again’ Anglican Christians. For Saved women, ‘Christ is enough’ (Kristo oromo); forcouples, Salvation entails marital fidelity or abstinence; and unmarried Saved persons aimfor premarital chastity. Being thus relegated to the marital union, sex is further restrictedby an emphasis among Saved Christians on ‘family planning’ and on endogamousmarriage among Saved families’ children. Saved sexual morality in Uhero views sex asfostering impurity and best avoided. The cleanness for which it strives is contingent uponthe maintenance of unambiguous boundaries of the body (through self-restraint andconcealment) and of one’s group (by focusing on the nuclear family, endogamy andclass). Loosening one’s bodily boundaries risks premarital pregnancy, oversized familiesand sickness and reveals a lack of ‘self-discipline’, which is the centre of Saved Christiansubjectivity. Only self-discipline ! chastity, birth control, hard work, savings andinvestment ! brings progress to a person or her family and group. This moral frameworklinks boundaries (of bodies and possessions) and growth in a very different way from thatof riwo: here, separations and confinement facilitate ‘development’ (dongruok), imaginedas augmentation, which excludes its opposites, such as weakness and wastage; there, thepermeation of boundaries by relations of difference is the origin of creation and ofgrowth (also dongruok), imagined as transformation, which encompasses its opposite:decay and decomposition. While Saved sex is about the confirmation of identity,intercourse according to riwo explores the potential of alterity.30

This dichotomous opposition of Saved and Earthly, separation and mixing, is ananalytical fiction. JoUhero move between these orientations: girls replace Jesus withboyfriends; widows decide that Christ is not enough, anyway. As Earthly people arequick to point out, Salvation does not prevent hypocrisy: ‘one sees the mouth pray, butdoes not know the heart’. And there are Christians with diverging views. As one mightexpect, Catholics are less strict with regard to family planning, but they share Anglicanconcerns regarding chastity.31 The new ‘born-again’ charismatic Churches also embraceand invigorate the discourse of bodily boundedness. In contrast, some members ofLegio Maria, an ex-Catholic independent African Church, interpret the death of todayas Divine punishment for the ‘sin of birth control’ that ‘the west’ brought to Africa.32

Thus being a Christian in Luoland need not mean adopting a puritan morality. Thissexual morality is important in Uhero not because the majority of JoUhero wouldadhere to it, nor because it neatly replaces other existing imaginations and practices ofintercourse, but because the polarity between Earthly and Christian imaginations shapesJoUhero’s understandings of intercourse, and because the contrasts that the moralistdiscourse rests upon inevitably reconfigure what is around them, drawing otherdiscourses into their binary frame. Saved practices in Uhero have been shaped bymissionary rejection of ‘pagan rituals’ of complementation and the logic of riwo, andthey rely on the very assumption that they claim not to ‘believe in’ (yie, also ‘to agree’):that physical contact engenders transformation. The new Luo Traditionalists have inturn borrowed Christian notions of sin and chastity in their reformulation of chike intofixed commandments, reconfiguring the Earthly perspective as mirror-image of theChristian discourse. These movements suggest underlying similarities between the twoapparently antagonistic perspectives, at least as far as the realm of explicit discourse is

Life Seen 135

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

concerned. These developments can be further explored in the recent debate aboutAIDS in Uhero.

The Proliferation of ‘Sex’

(i) AIDS and Chira

By 2000 most JoUhero have become familiar with AIDS or ayaki,33 but most consider itinappropriate to suggest that somebody specific has died of this disease. However, debatesabout AIDS and its relation to chira are abundant. Chira ! wasting, diarrhoea and skinsymptoms ! resembles AIDS,34 and intercourse is crucial to explanations for both AIDSand chira, but material contact, touch, has different meaning in the two illnesses.35 Chiraarises from inside, from a confusion in the substantial relations between people thatotherwise are necessary to sustain life. AIDS, by contrast, is an illness from outside, anextreme kind of ‘germ’. It is conceptualised in the metaphors of intrusion, battle anderadication that have shaped tropical medicine, and it reduces the relationship betweenbody and illness to an either!or: contaminated or clean, ‘positive’ or ‘negative’. It rendersillness and touch a matter of life and death, ‘yes’ or ‘no’, as anti-AIDS campaigns tirelesslyproclaim. AIDS is diametrically opposed to an understanding in terms of riwo, chike andchira, according to which illness is ultimately a problem of disturbed flows, of blockagesin the continuity between people and in the processes of life. Accordingly, conceptualisa-tions of illness as AIDS or chira lead potentially to different responses, one of whichdefends the boundaries of one’s body and group in the spirit of hygiene, while the otherone attempts to restore relations. Putting things in such antagonistic terms overlooks,however, the fact that in practice any long-term illness with the above symptoms can beeither or both, and that the two illnesses exist within the same social space. Local ideasabout AIDS have been shaped by chira, and, as we have already indicated, chira itself isnot simply the unchanged illness of long ago: with the re-constitution of Luo Tradition,chira has become a punishment for a bad deed, shifting the emphasis of this concept froma concern with relations, flows and transformative potentials, to one with punishment asa necessary to sanction individual moral transgressions.

(ii) AIDS and Moralism

The ‘moralisation’ of the social imagination and the conceptualisation of intercoursewithin the moral framework of ‘sex’ have undoubtedly been encouraged by educationaldiscourses on AIDS, which have emerged in Uhero during the 1990s. Since the beginningof the public debate about the AIDS epidemic in western Kenya, the Churches have playeda prominent role, reflecting and reinforcing the view of AIDS as a sexual and thus moralproblem.36 Accordingly, the main message on HIV education materials remained for long‘Say No!’ (emphasising in particular girls’ right to remain chaste) or ‘zero grazing’ (re-using a much earlier slogan for home-based cross-breed cattle husbandry). Whileemphasising the dangers of sex and adopting an either/or attitude towards it, thisdiscourse promoted a new openness, representing sex as a ‘natural’ part of life. InFoucault’s terms, it expanded the ongoing production of a discourse about sex that wesuggested Christian mission had initiated.

136 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

The continuity between Christian and AIDS discourses is reflected in Christiansermons about AIDS, particularly during funeral services. Favourite themes here arethe story of Sodom and the Book of Job, who in the face of loss did not lose faith.According to the Dholuo Bible, the devil states here that he is ‘just walking’(abayabaya). Since bayo in contemporary Dholuo also means to ‘move’ or ‘sleeparound’, this passage allows the preacher to enter into a discussion of HIV, linking‘movement’, promiscuity and the devil ! ‘it is the devil who makes people movearound’ ! and casting AIDS as this-worldly punishment. Sex is here linked to whatare seen as new kinds of mobility in terms of migration and labour, and to idlestrolling and dancing that give rise to promiscuity. Moral cleanness has thus becomeequivalent to containment and stasis. Pre-HIV Christian mission ideology largelyfailed to obliterate the social practices of riwo, which are anchored in everydaypractices and, as far as intercourse is concerned, shielded from view and debate.Christian AIDS-work instead assaults intercourse head-on, linking it to death andsuffering. It may be that it thereby lends the Christian message new transformationalpower.

Luo chike, which the Christian discourse had for long constituted as its antagonist, hasbeen drawn into this new, moralised area of discourse: the adherence to ‘Luo culture’,particularly concerning intercourse, is often blamed for the transmission of HIV. Fromthe opposite, Traditionalist angle, the neglect of ‘Luo rules’ is blamed for the widespreaddeath and illness and stricter rule-adherence is called for. The levirate, or ‘widowinheritance’ has an important place in this debate, since Christian AIDS discourses see itas morally and epidemiologically the worst Luo practice.37 In contrast, Traditionalistsattribute women’s resistance to the levirate to their bodily and economic greed, andregard this moral decay as the cause of death. Both discourses focus on the sexual act assomething that must or must not be performed. One insists on widows’ chastity, the otheron intercourse as the execution of a law. As this example shows, the moralisation ofintercourse in AIDS-related discourses on sex powerfully encourages a view of women asmorally endangered and dangerous and proposes ! from both a Saved and aTraditionalist perspective ! constraint and control.

(iii) Bounded Bodies and Open Speech

Condoms play a crucial role in the context of AIDS. Initially, opposition to condom usewas equally vehement among the Churches and among those who held Earthly views.38

They epitomised moral evil, both for Christian moralists, who saw them as thelegitimisation of promiscuity, and for the more Earthly inclined, who thought thatintercourse with a condom was no intercourse at all, as no mixing occurred, and sawthem as a tool of outside intervention into domestic life. However, while Saved Christiansinitially saw condoms as an invitation to infringe the boundaries of chastity, promotingsex, today younger Christians advocate their use, and neither priests nor teenagers find itdifficult to speak about condoms. Within their Christian or especially Saved morality ofboundary-marking and self-discipline, this separating layer of plastic between one personand the other in the sexual act appears to be an acceptable compromise ! Saved sex hasprefigured ‘safe sex’. One could say that AIDS has driven home (to the body) the virtue ofthe individual subject that Christian ideas of the person and of sin have long promoted.39

Along the way, the message has been radicalised as a question of life and death, for the

Life Seen 137

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

HIV virus ! in contrast to Christian concepts of sin ! knows no absolution. Now sins !acts that compromise the disciplined person and her bounded body ! equal death andthis-worldly suffering. Only impenetrable frontiers between one and the other can protectphysical life. The understanding of the ‘death of today’ as AIDS realises thus an olderproject of creating new subjects by separating one person and body from the other,around a specific bodily practice ! intercourse ! and makes personal choice on thatpractice a matter of life and death.

Speaking about HIV means speaking about sex, speaking of the act of intercourse andof the sexual partner, of his/her genitals and substances. A potent message of recent AIDSeducation has been ‘Let’s talk’, a marketing campaign for condoms ! emphasising theneed to speak about sex (Figure 2). Educational cartoons on this theme, displayed at thelocal dispensary, not only show people going to bed with each other (quite against localsensitivities and unheard of a decade ago) but depict a man and a woman sitting atopposite sides of a table, each with a speech-bubble attached to their heads, in which theimage of a condom represents their conversation before going to bed with each other.Condom adverts have even begun to promote condoms and, by implication, sex, as afashionable object of consumption, accompanied by the same iconography as multi-national softdrinks, suggesting that sex ‘. . . is the thing’ (or ‘Obey your thirst!’). Youcould hardly get further away from the discretion of riwruok. These are significant steps inthe production of the discourse on sex, drawing the amoral practice of riwo (specificallyintercourse) into the sphere of moral discourse and judgement, forcing it to speak underthe threat of death. Reluctantly, some younger JoUhero follow the call; while this will

Figure 2. ‘Let’s Talk’, roadside kiosk near Kisumu, western Kenya, 2002 (Authors’ photograph)

138 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7 hopefully reduce HIV transmission, it speaks about what was silent and it will effect widersocial changes.

The outcomes of this repositioning of intercourse and of the extension of the sexualdiscourse are not predictable. There are a few people, who adapt to it, condemn ‘sex’,discuss its evils and praise chastity; how much this tells us about their practice mustremain open. Others claim to adopt what an epidemiologist would call a ‘rational’ (andthus supposedly less moralist) approach and use condoms where they find themappropriate ! that is, where they imagine a danger for their own or the other body. Theystrip ‘safe sex’ of its moralist discourse while, one might argue, nevertheless accepting thelanguage of individual risk, and the imagination of either-or and boundary defence,conforming with Foucault’s evolutionary history of sexuality. However, many othersreject condoms in a gesture of defiance towards Christian preachers and overseasdevelopment workers, teachers and doctors alike. Thus, a number of unmarried girls inUhero, whom we asked for their occupation, defiantly responded ‘I am just walkingabout’ (abayo), evoking this term’s implication of promiscuity. Particularly for youngerpeople, the separation of bodies by condoms seems to be a problem, because it preventsnearness and flows. They know all they need to know about HIV, they bury theirage-mates every week, and yet they say about condoms ‘it’s like not sleeping with eachother’, ‘it must come out’, and many, even among the girls, take a defiant pride in notusing condoms, as captured in their statement (responding to the ‘zero grazing’ slogan,mentioned above): ‘We’d rather die with sweet grass in our mouths!’40 Thus, underneaththe evolving ‘sexualisation’ of intercourse and, with it, of ethics and sociality, theseyoung people search for alternative pathways. On the one hand, they appear hereincommitted to older imaginations of riwo, but on the other hand, the life they are lookingfor is not one of the past, and certainly not of reified Luo Traditions. Where are theyheading?

(iv) Pornography ! the Free View

Pornography, a recent phenomenon that further extends these developments, enragespuritan sensitivities and spurs the imagination of JoUhero, may give us some clues toaddress, though not to answer, this question.41 In the early 1990s, even western‘gentlemen’s’ magazines were illegal in Kenya. Ten years later, one can buy locallyproduced sex-magazines openly even in small market towns, and pornographic videos areshown in many a small, battery-driven VCR-cinema.42 An official ban on pornographyexists, but it is available at affordable prices, and youths of both sexes and many olderpeople are now familiar with these kinds of images, which generally are referred to asshowing ‘bad things’ (gik maricho), inverting the values of Christian morality andcreating a new place for sex in the moral imagination.43

The magazines carry colour images of scantily clad women and are often sealed intransparent plastic, which enhances the aura of the forbidden and has to be torn by thebuyer, underlining the link between gaze, intentional act and appropriation thatpornography consists in (Figures 1 and 4). Buying them is making a lifestyle choice,an act of luxurious consumption linked to identity. The urban, middle-class settings ofthe pornographic narratives (told in English but with Luo names and locations) involvehotels, Viagra, mobile phones and offices; references to ‘other societies’ and ‘the West’

Life Seen 139

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

situate them in terms of global connections. Despite their relative innocence, these imagesand stories cast light on the darkness between bodies, replace blind nearness with visualdistance. The other body and sex itself become tangible and commodified objects,implying the creation of a sexual subject, a self in pleasure. The dominant theme isaccordingly the orgasm, which both man and woman should have to ‘leave satisfied’,requiring discussion and ‘exercise in sexual techniques’ and careful ‘planning of arousaland climax’ (Figure 3). Technical illustrations, ‘wild ratings’ and promises of ‘multiple’,even ‘two-in-one’ orgasms turn intercourse into an object of sexological categorisationand knowledge, which against the backdrop of riwo is indeed extraordinary.44

The close relationship of these discourses to Christian morality is underlined byrecurrent emphasis, in the magazines’ texts, on the ‘badness’ of pornography, whichshould be ‘read only behind closed doors’.45 Most stories are about morally bad sex suchas adultery with a priest, seduction by a teacher, rape by street children, divorce due toViagra, teenage sex, forced circumcision and incest in a Luo village, and the editorcomments: ‘there are lessons here for fornicators: some things are only for those withstamina, and that includes sex’.46 Pornography’s attractiveness is derived from its positionwithin the moralist grid ! to engage with its ‘badness’ equals (male) toughness. A bikini-clad cover-‘Playgirl’ expresses a similar tension when she asks to be ‘dated in High classrestaurants’ but presents the motto: ‘I love my body as much as I hate sex’ (Figure 4).47

The ‘letters to the editor’ in these magazines freely mix Christian morality andTraditionalist reflections, when they search for ‘God fearing’ partners for marriage,express disgust over the ‘indecent dresses of Nairobi women’, rage about the ‘unAfrican

Figure 3. Making sex. Source: Bendo, Sex Curiosities , 29, 34

140 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

habit’ of kissing women ‘imitating alien cultures’, encourage the magazine to depict‘healthy looking, plump women’ whom ‘typical Africans admire’ and exchange sources ofpornographic videos.48 Woven into this pattern of sin and pleasure are warnings aboutAIDS: ‘No sex is worth dying for!’, and full-page advertisements in all the magazinespresent AIDS mortality figures and, seemingly in contrast to the other contents, urgereaders: ‘if you can’t abstain, use a condom, if married stick to one partner, and if not

Figure 4. Playgirl cover (September 2001)

Life Seen 141

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

pleased, be tested. AIDS kills!’ (Figure 1).49 The apparent contradictions between moralprecepts, fears of HIV/AIDS and yearning for satisfaction do not negate the fact that theseintertwined discourses of chastity, infection and pleasure share the idea of a bounded,self-protecting and self-interested person who acts (in sex and otherwise) upon the otherin a subject!object relation, and they rely on a binary morality according to which theindividual subject chooses between good or bad.

A subject of great fascination for young and old in Uhero seems to be oral sex (fellatioonly), which, according to the cited magazines, epitomises western influence. This makessense as oral sex represents the starkest contrast (sado-masochism being as yet unknown)to the non-intentionality and non-objectification of riwore. It focuses intentionality andreduces nearness to an act performed by a subject to a part, a thing (and by reversemetonymy, it turns the whole other who carries that thing into an object). Moreover, oralsex makes the sexual act itself an object of exchange, ‘something he wants’ and the girl‘gives him’, as a young woman put it. In oral sex, eating is turned into a metaphor ofconsumption and appropriation. We noted above that in everyday practice the linkbetween eating and intercourse, familiar from many African societies, relies on themerging-through-sharing that both imply. In oral sex the metaphorical substitution ofeating for sex and the conceptualisation of both as consumption is different: it separatesrather than merges subject and object. As yet, this is as far as one can get in Uhero on theway towards making oneself a subject and the other an object of pleasure.

That pornographic images and texts are condemned by the Anglican Church does notmean that they are antithetical to Christian discourses on sex. In contrast to their parents,young Anglicans (even Saved ones) have begun to discuss sex not as a source of sin thatneeds to be constrained, but as a need that must be allowed to take its course, lest it eruptin sinful ways. According to this view, Saved wives’ chastity risks driving their husbandsinto sin, and women are also perceived as having a right to sexual satisfaction. The latterwas brought home to us in all its novelty when a young Anglican deaconess, chatting withother well-to-do Saved women over tea after the Sunday Service said: ‘How can Jesus beenough for a widow of my age? She cannot live without that sweet feeling.’ The youngwomen agreed that both parts of a Christian couple are obliged to satisfy each othersexually. The deaconess, with whom we had earlier spoken about ‘the problem ofpornography’ (which she then had considered a threat to morality) added: ‘You see, that’swhere those ‘‘bad things’’ can even be of use.’ This ‘liberation’ of sex and its constitutionnot as a danger, but as an obligatory exchange of satisfaction, is a significant step in theevolution of Christian notions of individual bodies and persons.

Different ages see things differently: old ladies suspect their daughters-in-law ofspoiling their sons with unheard of sexual demands; some boys recognise the potential ofpornography to support dominance; some adventurous girls voice new ideas that frightenshy boys, who then claim to be Traditionalists. Worries about taboos and illness minglewith Christian sensitivities, and both feed into debates about what people do wrong, andinto the struggle to make sense of the current crisis. Thus, pornography does not replaceother idioms of sex, but the technical reproducibility of intercourse avails to JoUhero theobservational gaze as a new option, a new distance in what is potentially one of the closestmoments of human touch. It turns bodies into objects, reduces the complexity of riwruokto an ‘orgasm’, and makes sex itself an object, an act and an experience to be producedand exchanged, to be done and had.

142 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

It is ironic that images of pornographic nakedness should strike at the core of Africansociality and relatedness more than a hundred years after the gaze of the colonialoccupiers and their photographers constituted Africa as the ‘naked continent’, and theundressed black body as the object of white pornographic imaginations (as well as ofsocial control). A century after colonial picture postcards and expedition photographshave on the one hand fed into the subjection of Africans to western knowledge, and onthe other hand into the late modern sexual revolution, images of naked white peoplebring the message home to Africa.50 According to some western feminists thispornographic turn may have negative consequences: male domination, sexual violenceand promiscuity.51 More radically, as Kappeler suggests, one might argue that theimplications of pornography reach deeper than this: rather than merely prefiguring newrealities of sex (new modes of men acting upon women), pornography embodies thedeployment of representation for the constitution of a particular subjectivity marked byits distinction from and superiority to the other ! control, that is, unadulterated by thecontingent encounter with the other.52 As such, the advent of pornography in Uherosignals not only changing gender relations, but the progressive development of a way ofseeing that constitutes the opposite of touch.53

It would be premature to conclude, with Kappeler, that the pornographic fantasy or thesubjectivity of sight replaces other modalities of sociality in Uhero. To be sure, the debatesabout sex and pornography are part of larger struggles regarding subjectification, but it isimportant not to make assumptions about where all of this will lead to. At present,pornography is not, it seems, consumed by individuals, but in groups, sometimescomposed of men and women, with a mixture of bewilderment and excitement. It ismaybe more a medium of instruction and imagination about other possible worlds andan issue of debate, a modern symbol and a source of intimate knowledge about ‘whiteways’ (chike wazungu), which provides new sexual imaginaries, new objects of discourseand gaze, but not necessarily another practice (judging by the youths’ accounts, attemptsto make Uhero’s girls into objects are so far not very successful). One should also notethat, in the context of Uhero, pornography could also have beneficial consequences:rather than a mere outlet for the sexual frustrations of AIDS-induced chastity,pornography could be read as market-driven response to AIDS, extending ! in anunforeseen way ! the messages of ‘Let’s talk’ health education. It potentially enablespeople to talk about sex, making it an object of speech, and to look at sex as a thing thatone can make and remake. What will be lost on the way remains in darkness.

Conclusion

In contemporary Uhero, everyday practices of coming together and merging, riwo, sharethe social space around intercourse with other discourses, outlined above as ‘Puritan’ and‘Traditionalist’ (religious/moralist), ‘AIDS’ (medical/political) and ‘pornographic’ (re-presentational/commodified). These intertwined and interdependent discourses make‘sex’ as a discourse in Foucault’s sense, entangling intercourse with governmentality,market and the production of knowledge. They are aspects of Foucault’s ‘polymorphoustechnologies of power’, ‘strategies’ in Certeau’s sense, which have emerged in Uhero in ahistorical sequence similar to that outlined by Foucault, but over a shorter time span andas ready-assembled exports from more distant sources of government.54

Life Seen 143

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

While one could, following Foucault, regard pornography as an intensification of theprocesses of subjectification, objectification and commoditisation that mission, medicineand market have brought to bear upon JoUhero (and such an interpretation is certainlypartially correct), young JoUhero seem to make use of the new, diverse opportunities intheir own ways, rejecting the static rules of Christian or Traditional moralism and hygiene,which they experience as barriers to their own search for a way of life. Their bodily defiancehas a tradition in the same area, as witnessed by the occurrence, around 1932, of a self-assertive, anti-colonial and anti-mission youth movement, ‘The Fornicators’, whosubscribed to nakedness and ‘traditional’ dress, and were described by an English travelleras ‘naughty young men who roam the country having dances and orgies [and] paint roundone eye, which gives them a sinister appearance. [. . .] a reaction against our law andorder’.55 The Uhero youths’ rejection of boundaries and their insistence on continuedmovement and togetherness against the odds ! ‘We’d rather die with grass in our mouths’! also resembles the defiant rejection of ‘safe sex’ among Luo youth in Tanzania: ‘It isbetter both die than to use a condom’.56 However, apart from the obvious danger thatthese young people’s defiance entails, it is difficult to decide whether this should berepresented as a creative search for ways out of being stuck between past and future (a‘tactical’ appropriation of space, as Certeau celebrated), or whether this liberation isalready contained in the imagination of freedom that the new discourses transport (asFoucault and Pasolini argued in their critique of the European ‘sexual revolution’).

Uhero youths challenge modern discourses while simultaneously striving for the newopportunities that these offer to the ‘individual’. While informed by new sources such asvideo films, their search is rooted in another matrix, designated by the term riwo. In thissearch, photographs, narratives and video films such as those mentioned above mightindeed be educative, but the optimism of some ethnographers of modern African youth,such as Richards, who interprets similar imagery as sources of ‘imaginative solutions tothe challenges posed by the global epidemic of drugs and violence’, appears to us naive,neglecting the less palatable transformations of the subject and his imagination, which thenew images ! be they violent or pornographic ! set in motion.57 These need a morethorough examination. A hundred years after colonial occupation, mission andmedicalisation, riwo appears still to be the dominant theme of intercourse in Uhero,despite church and school practices, sexual moralism, AIDS education and pornography.Its persistence may be explained partly by the limited power and reach (compared tonineteenth- and twentieth-century European governmentality) of the strategic institu-tions in Kenya. But it is not just a matter of limited power, but also of the particular waysin which riwo is embedded and reproduced in everyday practices of touch, both fleetingand momentous, reiterated in many daily gestures, which (like intercourse) are inexplicitand often shielded from view. Furthermore, there exists a collective imagination inUhero, which ! although contested and affected by the strategic discourses ofTraditionalism that draw it into the field of discursive power-play ! insists on thecontinuance of riwo in specific practices: chike, the order of life.58

Once these everyday practices are rendered reified Tradition, made into discourse, theybecome the object of reflections and engaged in contests with other discourses ! be theymoralist Christian or libertine Pornographic ! and they potentially lose ground or hardeninto authoritarian rules. For the time being, this has only happened to a limited extent: onlythe ‘ears of the hippopotamus’ have become visible, while most of it remains submerged inthe muddy waters of the everyday, or, in the particular case of intercourse, in the darkness

144 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

of the night. Riwo persists, apart from intercourse, in the many momentary movements ofone person towards the other, producingmyriads of relations in a continuous daily practicein which being or coming together remains the ultimate value. Life springs from riwo, butalso death ! and although one may be enthralled by young JoUhero’s defiance in the face ofmedical rationality and Christian morals in their defence of togetherness, it might be thisvery source of persistence and continuity that brings about its destruction.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the people of ‘Uhero’ and especially to Mercy and her family, and to Mary and her large familyfor their hospitality and patience. Thanks to Philister Madiega and Emmah Odundo who worked with us. Ourlate teacher and friend Susan Benson’s reading of an earlier draft was enormously helpful. The fieldwork wascarried out in association to the Kenyan Danish Health Research Project, and was funded by grants from theDanish Council for Development Research. Additional support came from the Institute of Anthropology(University of Copenhagen), the Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory, the Wenner-Gren Foundation and the Smutsand the Rivers Funds, University of Cambridge. Names of places and persons have been changed.

Notes1 Title of a sex-focused ‘pornographic’ magazine in Kenya.2 In 2002, at the end of our last long-term stay (2000!02) in this village in which we have worked on and offsince 1995, Uhero had 956 inhabitants distributed across 105 scattered patrilineal, virilocal homesteads. Mostpeople engaged in subsistence agriculture, some planted locally marketed cash crops, many of the men fishedand men and women engaged in short-distance fish trade. Many of the older people had lived and worked intowns before settling in their rural homes, and many of Uhero’s young people were moving between villageand town, working or looking for work. Like elsewhere in rural Nyanza, most households in Uhero have reliedon migrants’ remittances for cash needs such as schooling, medical care and even for food (Hay ‘Luo Womenand Economic Change’; Stichter, Migrant Labour in Kenya; Cohen and Odhiambo, Siaya). In the last decadethese remittances have become increasingly unreliable, due to growing urban unemployment and returnmigration, as well as to the burden of illness and death due to AIDS (Francis, ‘Migration and ChangingDivisions of Labour’).

3 See Prince, ‘Salvation and Tradition’.4 Each year of our fieldwork, between 2000 and 2003, thirty JoUhero died (above 3 per cent, a likelyunderestimation due to our census procedures) and about half of these deaths affected young adults, possiblyrelated to HIV/AIDS. Likewise, the age-distribution showed the mark of AIDS, the middle age groups beingreduced by deaths among younger adults. Accordingly, JoUhero recognised ‘the death of today’, which manysaw as but the outcome of a long-term loss and decline captured in the expression: ‘the land [piny, also ‘earth’and ‘community’] is dying’.

5 See Whyte, ‘The Widow’s Dream’, 101!03, or Heald, ‘Power of Sex’, 128!45 for respectively Marachi andGisu, both neighbours of the Luo.

6 Ahlberg, ‘Is there a Distinct African Sexuality?’, 220!42.7 Our emphasis is here on spoken and written discourse, due to the limitations of our fieldwork data, and inorder to be able to provide an overview of several different discourses, between which intercourse isnegotiated. Thus, the sensual, embodied aspects of knowing, undoubtedly important to our topic, are not theobject of the reflections below.

8 According to women of various ages, love-potions (referred to as ‘medicine’ (yath)) used to be employed bywives to attract their husbands with the ultimate aim of conception. In contrast, according to them, there werenow a growing variety of potions, often with foreign origin or connotations (one was recommended to Odhisas ‘Atlantic’, the ‘Luo Viagra’), which aimed to attract men (less frequently women) for sexual satisfaction.

9 Classificatory relations are distinguished by inverted commas to enable the reader, familiar with biologicalkinship reckoning, to realise the extension of kin terms and relations beyond biology.

10 Odhis referred in this debate to ethnographic work on the Luo he had read, arguing that ‘Luo rules’, especiallyin his father’s ‘born-again Traditionalist’ rendering ‘only serve[d] to maintain the old people’s authority andthe stages’ of hierarchy and could not contribute to ‘development’ (see below).

Life Seen 145

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

11 Intercourse can be called riwo only among those who are ‘free’, such as peers or grandmothers and their

grandchildren. Usually, if one talks about it, euphemisms referring to related practices of physical nearness or

sharing are used ! ‘to sleep’ (nindo) or ‘sit together’ (bedo kanyakla achiel), ‘to eat’ (chiemo) or ‘bite’ (kayo) !and even these are not used freely. In the ritual context, tieko (‘to finish’) chik refers to required intercourse.

12 Similar restrictions of speech, vision and touch related to intercourse apply among the Gisu (Heald, ‘Power of

Sex’, 131).13 Even in funeral ‘discos’, boys and girls dance by themselves, and bodily contact occurs in darkness.14 Hay, Who Wears the Pants?, 5!6.15 Some girls complained they ‘could not know’ whether a boy had put on a condom, which (even if it is an

excuse for the girls’ unwillingness to use condoms, which many girls admitted to) only makes sense if it is dark

and if the genitals are not touched.16 Levinas, Die Spur des Anderen, 198!200.17 Heald, ‘Power of Sex’.18 We distinguish the wider field of ‘ethical’ evaluations of human conduct from ‘morality’ as ethical systems

setting up ‘law-like obligations’ in a strictly binary frame. Morality in this sense is but a ‘certain kind of answer

to the question: how ought one to live?’, ‘distinguished among ethical systems’ (Laidlaw, For an Anthropology

of Ethics, 14).19 See Cohen, ‘Doing Social History from Pim’s Doorway’, 191!228; Cohen and Odhiambo, Siaya.20 Ominde, The Luo Girl, 31!32, 37. See also Evans-Pritchard, ‘Marriage Customs of the Luo of Kenya’, 228!44.In the past newly-wed girls were apparently even permitted to sleep with their earlier lovers (chodene, sg.

chotne), i.e. those with whom they previously had only chodo, until the ritual of riso when the husband

brought cattle to the girl’s parents, built a house for her and she began to cook for him (Ocholla-Ayayo,

Traditional Ideology and Ethics, 149).21 See also Cohen and Odhiambo, Siaya, 97. These laments do probably reflect dramatically changed marriage

practices or at least a delay of formal marriage compared to the previous generations. In 2000, very few of the

young couples in Uhero had even commenced wedding visits and only in one case did we witness the bringing

(tero) of a single cow to the bride’s home, whereas the older men and women generally claimed that numerous

cows had been brought for their marriage (up to 15). (A formal ‘bridewealth survey’ was not possible as the

topic was too sensitive).22 When we asked Mary and other old women directly, they confirmed the older ethnographies’ descriptions of

chodo, and that they had been taught about it by their ‘grandmothers’, whereas in contrast, Mary’s

granddaughters and most others who speak English translate chodo as ‘to prostitute’ or ‘sleep around’ with

implications of moral waywardness and danger (of illness). Even old Mary uses it at times in this sense to

chastise the mores of certain contemporary girls. It is also used in this sense in the Luo Bible.23 This transformation was probably linked, like in the case of other socially important concepts, to the

particular use of these terms in the Luo Bible, translated by missionaries, and in Christian speech.24 See Prince, ‘Salvation and Tradition’.25 See e.g. Mboya, Luo Kitigi gi Timbegi; K’Aoko, The Re-Introduction of: Luo Circumcision-Rite; Ogutu, Ker

Ramogi is Dead; Malo, Jaluo; Raringo, Chike jaduong e dalane.26 Parkin, Cultural Definition, 149!63. Parkin’s idea that 1960s rural Luo were predominantly concerned with

witchcraft was born out by JoUhero’s narratives of the 1960s sleeping sickness epidemic, which were full of

witchcraft accusations. This is unlike the present situation, in which witchcraft has become marginal

compared to chira (for a similar argument about witchcraft and taboo in western Kenya see Whyte and Whyte,

‘Cursing and Pollution’).27 Whisson, ‘Some Aspects of Functional Disorders’, 283!304; Douglas, Purity and Danger.28 Wilson, Luo Customary Law and Marriage Customs.29 Hay, Western Clothing and African Identity; Hay, Who Wears the Pants?30 In de Certeau’s terms, Saved sex could be said to rely on a ‘strategic’ imagination focused upon ownership of

‘place’ ! that is, the Saved, self-disciplined person and her body (and the family and the Church) (see Certeau,

The Practice of Everyday Life, 34!42). In contrast, riwo designates a ‘tactical’ engagement with the other within

which relations are reconfigured and remade out of movements that produce moments of touch and

contingence, culminating in ! but not to be reduced to ! conception and birth. Such tactical engagement

does not rely on the possession of power and indeed, in the case of intercourse, it seems purposely withdrawn

from the reach of the calculus of power. In contrast, Christian morality (as well as Tradition) constructs sex

and its control as a domain of self-making and of deployment of power. This power is often employed to

146 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

control women, but, as the case of Saved, independent widows shows, it may also be a means for women to

take control of their lives. Either way, it fashions new persons.31 See Catell, ‘Praise the Lord’.32 Schwartz, Selected Aspects of Legio Maria Symbolism; Schwartz, ‘Christianity and the Construction of Global

History’, 134!74; Prince, ‘The Legio Maria Church in Western Kenya’.33 Ayaki derives from the verb yako, ‘to plunder’, ‘to grab’, ‘to gobble up’.34 These symptoms of chira predate the HIV epidemic (Abe, ‘The Concepts of Chira and Dhoch among the Luo

of Kenya’, 127!39).35 The relationship between chira and AIDS remains a puzzle to villagers. The two illnesses can be glossed as

identical, as when an elderly neighbour remarked: ‘we used to call it chira but now we know it as AIDS’, or

when people argue that: ‘in the old days, chira could be treated with manyasi’, ‘but nowadays’ this is no longer

the case because ‘people move so much (geographically, socially and sexually) that one does not know whom

one sleeps with’ (i.e. one does not know his/her relations and situation in life). Alternatively, the two illnesses

can be regarded as distinct, as in: ‘chira comes from spoiling chike, AIDS is from sleeping with somebody who

has it’. In spoken discourse (especially in interviews) people construct relatively clear relationships between the

two illnesses, but in everyday life distinctions are blurred. The different connotatioins of the two illnesses are

evident in the synonyms used for them: chira is the illness ‘of long ago’ (machon), ‘of home’ (mar dala), ‘of the

land’ (mag piny), associated with Luo identity and expressing the present crisis of Luo life, as people have leftthe Luo ways and lost direction in life. Ayaki is the ‘new illness’ (tuo manien), ‘from outside’ (mar oko), ‘from

town’ (mar taun), also ‘of moving’ (mar bayo), associated with an intrusion from outside, and excessive,undirected movement.

36 During the 1990s the question of teaching schoolchildren about HIV/AIDS was debated in the national media,

schools and homes. Initially, an alliance of government (unwilling to engage with the issue), parents (who felt

that such matters should not be talked about between adults of reproductive age and children) and churches

(who refused to accept the fact of pre- and extra-marital sex) objected to such teaching. Eventually ! and

again to some extent driven by the major churches ! this gave way to some HIV education.37 See Prince, ‘Salvation and Tradition’; Okeyo and Allen, ‘Influence of Widow Inheritance’.38 Sometimes the two positions drew upon each other. Thus, some youths referred to a preacher’s claims that

condoms could not prevent AIDS to justify their reluctance to use them. Especially during the initial condom

donation programmes, when truckloads of condoms appeared in western Kenya without much explanation,

rumours about the impregnation of these condoms with HIV occurred ! tied in with rumours that HIV had

been spread by the Americans to eradicate black people, or by the government to get rid of the Luo (similar

rumours are found in many parts of Africa, e.g. in the Ashanti region of Ghana, Susan Benson, personal

communication).39 It is an awareness of this continuous process of subjectification and individuation that is implicit in JoUhero’s

talk about the ‘death of today’ being caused by a lack of ‘love’ (hera) between people; that is by the neglect of

the practices of relatedness in the sense of riwo, which are synonymous with hera; for them, people die because

they are no longer ‘together’, while from the perspective of AIDS knowledge, they cannot be together because

they will die.40 Taylor describes similar concerns among Rwandans with the ‘blocking’ effects of condoms, preventing‘reciprocal flows of secretions between the two partners’, which he interprets in relation to Rwandan notions

of ‘fractal’ personhood based on substantial continuities between persons, which much resemble the

understanding of personhood captured in the Luo concept of riwo (Taylor, ‘Condoms and Cosmology’, 1023!28, 1026).

41 We refer to different media focusing on sex (mainly magazines and videos) as ‘pornography’ although this

term is not commonly used in Uhero, because the magazines are the most recognisable form of this new

discourse (see Figure 1), and because these expressions all share an emphasis on visual distance and

objectification by gaze, which is central to the pornographic mode of relating to the world. This choice of term

should not gloss over important differences between western pornography and the materials common in

Uhero: for instance, many of the magazines also seem to have an educational aim.42 Internet pornography does not play a role in the rural areas yet. Unlike professionals in Kisumu and Nairobi,

no JaUhero has regular access to private internet facilities. The computers in the two internet cafes in Kisumu

contained no traces of pornographic website use, probably because of the relatively public setting.43 The proliferation of ‘bad’ pictures and texts has been accompanied by ‘bad’ music, dance and lyrics, which are

hotly discussed in Uhero and have a much broader audience (e.g. at the nightly discos at village funerals). Thenew lyrics praise girls’ bodies and refer to sex in a way that horrifies moralists of Christian and Traditionalist

Life Seen 147

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

colours. The 2001 ‘hit’ ‘Adhiambo’s buttocks’ (Adhiambo Sianda), for example, contains lines like: ‘Her pantymakes me so happy ! small and clean ! Your intercooler kills me, your intercooler makes me happy’, whichled the local Anglican Church to denounce this tape as ‘unchristian’. Similarly, ‘Atoti’, a 2002 hip-hop songdwells on the male singer’s pleasure in viewing his girl’s different body parts, which she presents to him in herdance (Prince, ‘Popular Music and Luo Youth’).

44 E.g. Bendo, Sex Curiosities, 29!31.45 Playgirl (September, 2001): 2.46 ‘Life Seen!’ For Those Who Love Life (September, 2001); 2.47 Playgirl (September, 2001): 1.48 ‘Life Seen!’ For Those Who Love Life (September, 2001): 24!27.49 ‘The wildest sex guide’ combines descriptions of venereal diseases and HIV with images of acrobatic sexualpositions and of white couples having sex, to relate a somewhat ambiguous message (Midui, Wildest SexGuide).

50 See e.g. Hay, Who Wears the Pants?; Corbey, ‘Alterity: The Colonial Nude’, 75!92.51 See Dworkin, Pornography. Similarly, local Christian discourses and debates in the Kenyan newspapers (e.g.Daily Nation, Saturday Magazine, ‘Rid us of this Filth’, p.5, 5 Jan. 2002) regarded pornography as a threat tomorality.

52 Kappeler, The Pornography of Representation, 59.53 In other words, rather than constituting a threat to morality, pornography is the apotheosis of the particularform of separating morality, which produces the modern, moral subject.

54 Foucault, History of Sexuality. Vol.1; Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life.55 Perham, East African Journey, 150!51.56 Dilger, ‘Sexuality, AIDS, and the Lures of Modernity’, 23!52.57 Richards, Fighting for the Rain Forest, 114.58 This differs from Certeau’s inner-city ‘tactics’, which he suggests refer to ‘older’ forms but remain inchoate andinarticulate and, maybe more importantly, unaware of their links to past and memory, place and landscape.

References

Abe, T. ‘‘The concepts of chira and dhoch among the Luo of Kenya’’. In Themes in Socio-Cultural Ideas andBehaviour Among the Six Ethnic Groups of Kenya, edited by N. Nagashima. Tokyo: Hitotsubashi University,1981.

Ahlberg, B. M. ‘‘Is there a Distinct African Sexuality? A Critical Response to Caldwell’’. Africa 64, no. 2 (1994):220!42.

Bendo, E. K. Sex Curiosities. Things you Have Nobody to Ask or May be Afraid to Ask. Nairobi: Almega Media,2000.

Cattell, M. G. ‘‘Praise the Lord and Say No to Men: Older Women Empowering Themselves in Samia, Kenya.’’.Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 7 (1992): 307!30.

Certeau, M. de. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Cohen, D. W. ‘‘Doing Social History from Pim’s Doorway.’’ In Reliving the Past: The Worlds of Social History,

edited by O. Zunz. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1985.Cohen, D. W., and E. S. A. Odhiambo. Siaya: The Historical Anthropology of an African Landscape. Nairobi:

Heinemann Kenya, 1989.Corbey, R. ‘‘Alterity: The Colonial Nude. A Photographic Essay.’’ Critique of Anthropology 8, no.3 (1988): 75!92.Dilger, H. ‘‘Sexuality, AIDS, and the Lures of Modernity: Reflexivity and Morality among Young People in Rural

Tanzania.’’ Medical Anthropology 22, no.1 (2003): 23!52.Douglas, M. Purity and Danger. An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Ark, 1984.Dworkin, A. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. New York: The Women’s Press, 1981.Evans-Pritchard, E. E. ‘‘Marriage Customs of the Luo of Kenya.’’ In The Position of Women in Primitive Societies

and Other Essays in Social Anthropology, edited by E. E. Evans-Pritchard. London: Faber & Faber, 1965.Foucault, M. History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: An Introduction. London: Penguin Books, 1990.Francis, E. ‘‘Migration and Changing Divisions of Labour: Gender Relations and Economic Change in Koguta,

Western Kenya.’’. Africa 65 (1995): 197!215.Hay, M. J. ‘‘Luo Women and Economic Change During the Colonial Period.’’ In Women in Africa: Studies in

Social and Economic Change, edited by N. J. B. Hafkin and E. G. Bay, 87!109. Stanford: Stanford UniversityPress, 1976.

148 P. W. Geissler & R. J. Prince

Dow

nloa

ded

By:

[G

eiss

ler,

P. W

enze

l] A

t: 15

:47

27 M

arch

200

7

*** . Western Clothing and African Identity: Changing Consumption Patterns among the Luo. Boston: AfricanStudies Centre, Boston University, 1989.

*** . Who Wears the Pants? Christian Missions, Migrant Labour and Clothing in Colonial Western KenyaII.Boston: African Studies Centre, Boston University, 1992.

Heald, S.Manhood and Morality. Sex, Violence, and Ritual in Gisu Society. London & New York: Routledge, 1999.*** . ‘‘The Power of Sex: Reflections on the Caldwell’s ‘African Sexuality’ Thesis.’’ In Manhood and Morality.

Sex, Violence, and Ritual in Gisu Society, edited by S. Heald. London & New York: Routledge, 1999.K’Aoko, D. O. The Re-Introduction of Luo Circumcision-Rite. Nairobi: Frejos Printers, 1986.Kappeler, S. The Pornography of Representation. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986.Laidlaw, J. ‘‘For an Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom.’’ The Malinowski Memorial Lecture 2001, London,

2001.Levinas, E. Die Spur des Anderen. Munchen: Alber, 1999. Originally published as En decouvrant l’existence avec

Husserl et Heidegger (Paris: Vrin, 1949).‘‘Life Seen!’’ For Those Who Love Life. September. Nairobi: Jondika Properties, 2001.Malo, S. Jaluo. Nairobi: Joseph Otieno Malo, 1999.Mboya, P. Luo Kitigi gi Timbegi (A Handbook of Luo Customs; in Dholuo). Kisumu: Anyange Press, 1983.Midui, J. Wildest Sex Guide. Nairobi: Immediate Media Services, 2001.Ocholla-Ayayo, A. B. C. Traditional Ideology and Ethics among the Southern Luo. Uppsala: Scandinavian Institute

of African Studies, 1976.Ogutu, G. E. M. Ker Ramogi is Dead. Who Shall Lead my People? Reflections on Past, Present and Future Luo

Thought and Practice. Kisumu: Palwa Research Publications, 1995.Okeyo, T. M., and A. K. Allen. ‘‘Influence of Widow Inheritance on the Epidemiology of AIDS in Africa.’’ African

Journal of Medical Practice 1, no. 1 (1994): 20!25.Ominde, S. H. The Luo Girl from Infancy to Marriage. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau, 1952.Parkin, D. The Cultural Definition of Political Response. Lineal Destiny among the Luo. London and New York:

Academic Press, 1978.Perham, M. East African Journey: Kenya and Tanganyika, 1929!30. London: Faber and Faber, 1976.Playgirl. September. Nairobi: Guidepost Information Centre, 2001.Prince, R. J. ‘‘The Legio Maria Church in Western Kenya: Healing with the Holy Spirit and the Rejection of

Medicines.’’ MSc diss., Department of Anthropology, University College London, 1999.*** . ‘‘Popular Music and Luo Youth in Western Kenya: Ambiguities of Modernity, Morality and Gender

Relations in the Era of AIDS.’’ In Navigating Youth, Generating Adulthood. Social Becoming in an AfricanContext, edited by C. Christiansen, M. Utas and H. Vigh. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute, 2006.

*** .‘‘Salvation and Tradition: Configurations of Faith in a Time of Death’’ Journal of Religion in Africa 37,no.1 (2007): in press.

Raringo. Chike jaduong e dalane (The rules of the old man in his home). Nairobi: Three Printers and Stationers,2001.

Richards, P. Fighting for the Rain Forest. War, Youth and Resources in Sierra Leone. Oxford and Portsmouth, N.H.:James Currey and Heinemann, 1996.

Schwartz, N. Selected Aspects of Legio Maria Symbolism: A Case Study from a Village Community in East Alego.Nairobi: Institute of African Studies, 1985.

*** . ‘‘Christianity and the Construction of Global History: The Example of Legio Maria.’’ In CharismaticChristianity and Global History, edited by K. Poewe. Chapel Hill and London: University of North CarolinaPress, 1994.

Stichter, S. Migrant Labour in Kenya: Capitalism and African Response, 1895!1975. Harlow: Longman, 1982.Taylor, C. C. ‘‘Condoms and Cosmology: The ‘Fractal’ Person and Sexual Risk in Rwanda.’’ Social Science and

Medicine 31, no.9 (1990): 1023!28.Whisson, M. G. ‘‘Some Aspects of Functional Disorders Among the Kenya Luo.’’ In Magic Faith and Healing,

edited by A. Kiev. New York: Free Press, 1964.Whyte, Susan Reynolds. ‘‘The Widow’s Dream: Sex and Death in Western Kenya.’’ In Personhood and Agency: The

Presentation of Self and Other in African Cultures, edited by M. Jackson and I. Karp. Uppsala: ActaUniversitatis Uppsaliensis, 1990.

Whyte, S. R. and M. A. Whyte ‘‘Cursing and Pollution: Supernatural Styles in Two Luyia-Speaking Groups.’’ Folk23 (1981): 65!80.

Wilson, G. Luo Customary Law and Marriage Customs. Nairobi: Government Printer, 1968.

Life Seen 149