LEARNING AT THIRD GRADE OF MAN 2 PADANG ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of LEARNING AT THIRD GRADE OF MAN 2 PADANG ...
STUDENTS’PERCEPTION ON LEARNING ENGLISH BY USING E-LEARNING AT THIRD GRADE OF MAN 2 PADANG PANJANG
ACADEMIC YEARS 2020/2021
A Thesis
Submitted as a partial fulfillment of the requirements to obtain strata one (S1)
Degree on English Education Department
Submitted by:
Dinda Olienpia
NIM. 2316.016
Advisor :
Dr. Arifmiboy, S.Ag, M.Pd
NIP. 197905052007101002
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TARBIYAH AND TEACHER TRAINING
STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF BUKITTINGGI
ABSTRACT
Dinda Olienpia, 2316.016. Students’Perception on Learning Englishby Using E-learning at Third Grade of MAN 2 Padang Panjang AcademicYear 2020/2021 . A thesis, English Education Department, State Islamic Instituteof Bukittinggi, 2021.
The background of the problem of this research is the obstacle on learningprocess during pandemic Corona Virus Dieses (COVID-19). It caused traditionallearning process or face to face in class move to using E-learning. The using of E-learning in learning English automatically makes the teacher and students shock.It caused the teacher and students there is no the knowledge about the way to dolearning process by using E-learning. Thus, it carried out the differences students’perception on learning English by using E-learning.
The purpose of this research is to know students’perception on learningEnglish by using E-learning related to the learning purpose, assignment andfeedback. It caused the first experience for the students doing learning processusing E-learning especially that used network.
This research was survey research. The data were collected by onlinequestioner. The subjects of this research were students of IPA Class at ThirdGrade of MAN 2 Padang Panjang with the total 111 students and students whowill be used as research samples 28 students. In analyzed the data usedquantitative descriptive techniques with percentages and mean formula.
The result of this research was the researcher conducted with the titlestudents’perception on learning English by using E-learning at third grade ofMAN 2 Padang Panjang. The researchers did this research because to know whatare students’perception on learning English by using E-learning related tolearning purpose, assignment and feedback. The result of this result is good. Itcaused the mean of learning purpose 72,29%, assignment 70,28%, and feedback60,03%. It means the average of each indicator was 67,6% based on interpretationdata 61% - 80% is good category..
Keywords:students’perception,E-learning
ABSTRAK
Dinda Olienpia, 2316.016. Persepsi Siswa Terhadap PembelajaranBahasa Inggris Menggunakan E-learning di Kelas Tiga MAN 2 PadangPanjang Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021 . skripsi, Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, InstitutAgama Islam Negri Bukittinggi, 2021.
Latar belakang masalah dari penelitian ini adalah rintangan dalam prosespembelajaran selama pandemic Corona Virus Dieses (COVID-19). Itudikarenakan proses pembelajaran tradisional atau tatap muka di kelas di ubahmenjadi E-learning. Penggunaan E-learning dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggrissecara otomatis membuat guru dan siswa merasa terkejut. Itu dikarenakan gurudansiswa tidak memiliki pengalaman belajar bahsa Inggris menggunakan E-learning.Jadi, itu memebawa perbedaan persepsi siswa dalam belajar bahasa Inggrismenggunakan E-learning.
tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui persepsi siswa dalampembelajaran bahasa Inggris dengan menggunakan E-learaning berhubungandengan tujuan pemebelajaran, tugas, dan umpan balik. Itu dikarenakanpengalaman pertama untuk siswa melakukan proses pembelajaran menggunakan E-learning terutama menggunakan jaringan internet.
Ini adalah penelitian survey. Data dikumpulkan melalui online kuesioner.Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa-siswa dari kelas dua belas IPA MAN 2Padang Panjang dengan jumlah 111 siswa da siswa yang menjadi sample daripenelitian berjumlah 28 siswa. Dalam menganalisa data menggunakan kuantitatifdeskrisptif teknik dengan rumus percenan dan mean.
Hasil dari penelitian ini telash peneliti kumpulkan melalui judul students;perception on learning English by using E-learning at third grade of MAN 2Padang Panjang peneliti melakukan penelitian ini karena untuk mengetahui apasaja persepsi siswa terhadap pembelajaran bahsa Inggris dengan menggunak E-learning berhubungan dengan tujuan pemebelajaran, tugas dan umpan balik. Hasildari penelitian ini adalah baik. Itu dikarenakan rata-rata dari tujuan pemebelajaran72,29%, tugas 70.28%, and umpan balik 60, 03%. Jadi rata-rata dari ketigaindikator adalah 67% berdasarkan data interpretasi 61% - 80% adalah termasukkategori baik.
Kata Kunci : persepsi siswa, E-learning
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Bismillahirrohmanirrohiim. Alhamdulillahirabbil ‘alamin, praised to Allah,
The Entirely and Especially Merciful, who always gives all the goodness and
charity also the strength to the researcher in completing this thesis. Shalawat and
Salam to the most honorable prophet Muhammad SAW, the messenger, and his
followers who has opened our mind to study until now. This thesis is finished by
helping and supports of many people contribution. Therefore, the researcher wants
to present her great thanks and sincere gratitude to these following persons:
1. Dr. Ridha Ahida, M. Hum as the Rector of IAINBukittinggi.
2. Dr. Asyari, M. Si as the first Vice Rector, Dr. Novi Hendri, M.Ag as the
second Vice Rector and Dr. Miswadi, M.Hum as the third Vice Rector of
IAIN Bukittinggi.
3. Dr. Zulfani Sesmiarni, M.Pd as the Dean of Faculty of Tarbiyah and
Teacher Training and also her first, second and third vicedean.
4. Loli Safitri, M. Pd as the Head of English Education Department Program.
5. Dr, Arifmiboy S.Ag, M.Pd as an advisor who has given attention, help,
guidance, advice and golden time for the researcher to accomplish this
thesis.
6. Eliza, S.S, M.Pd as the PA who always guide me in IAIN Bukittinggi,
and as examiner who have given attention, critics and suggestion to this
thesis.
7. Mery Prima Dewi, M.Pd as the examiners who have given attention, critics
and suggestion to this thesis.
8. My lovely Mom Sri Ananda and Dad Saparudin, and also my six sisters,
Indah Dea Amanda, Ade Wulandari (Almh), Suci Ramadani, Aura
Afriantika, Cinta Aprilia, and Syakira Azzahra.who always give the best
pray, love and support.
9. My best friends pipit, ayy, and honey who always hugging in a joy and in
a sorrow condition to the researcher along the study process in IAIN
Bukittinggi.
My ex-roommate at Flamboyan, and my bobrok friends at the end semester
and my ukhti2. Also my friends at PBI A 16, ENGLISH DEPARTEMENT
2016. Thanks to always accompany me on learning process.
10. All of staff, teacher, and students at MAN Padang Panjang, especially
English teacher at IPA third grade and all of students of IPA third grade as
a population and sample in this research.
The researcher hopes that Allah SWT always blesses all of
them,who have been mentioned or not. Indeed, the writer believes that this
thesis might still have some weaknesses. Therefore, researcher hopes that
there will be some critiques and suggestions tomake thisthesis better.
Bukittinggi, Maret 2021
Dinda Olienpia
NIM. 2316.016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT....................................................................................................i
ABSTRAK.....................................................................................................ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT............................................................................. iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................ iv
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of The Problem...............................................................1
B. Identification of Problem.................................................................... 7
C. Limitation of Problem.........................................................................7
D. Formulation of The Problem...............................................................8
E. Purpose of The Research.................................................................... 8
F. Significance of The Research............................................................. 8
G. Definition of Key Term...................................................................... 9
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
A. Review of Related Theory
1. The Nature of Students’Perception
a. The Definition of Perception10............................................ 10
b. The Factors That Include in Perception................................12
c. Process of Perception............................................................13
d. Organization of Perception................................................... 15
e. Object of Perception............................................................. 15
f. Consistency of Perception.................................................... 16
2. The Nature of Learning
a. The Definition of Learning................................................... 17
b. Kinds of Learning................................................................. 18
c. The Factor that Influence Learning...................................... 20
d. The ways to Effective Learning............................................21
3. The Nature of E-learning
a. Definition of E-learning........................................................22
b. Modes of E-learning............................................................. 26
c. Types of E-learning.............................................................. 26
d. The Advantages of E-learning.............................................. 30
e. The Disadvantages of E-learning..........................................31
f. Learning Goals......................................................................32
g. Assignment........................................................................... 34
h. Feedback............................................................................... 36
B. Review of Related Study.................................................................. 39
C. Conceptual Framework.....................................................................41
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD
A. Design of The Research.................................................................... 42
B. Population and Sample..................................................................... 42
C. Instrument......................................................................................... 44
D. Technique of Data Collection........................................................... 46
E. Technique of Data Analysis..............................................................46
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING
A. Finding..............................................................................................48
B. Discussion.........................................................................................56
CHAPTER V DISCUSSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion........................................................................................ 57
B. Suggestion.........................................................................................59
REFERENCE........................................................................................60
APPENDIXE......................................................................................... 65
12
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of The Problem
In the middle of March the government releases a handbill. In this
handbill number 440/2436/SJ point 1 B declare that “Learning process,
training and orientation is conducted through long distance education by
using technology and information.”1) This handbill is released because
there is a pandemic. Therefore, learning process changed to learn through
long distance education.
During pandemic learning process is changed. Change in this case
means the way. The ways to learn, usually students and teacher did
learning process at the school in the class but during pandemic it have
been changed. Change to long distance learning. According to Mackenzie,
Postage, Schupham in Suparman and Zuhairi long distance education
based on its mission is an idea in creating an opportunity for people who is
hindered to learn in the classroom. It is because of some reasons that are:
limitation in acquiring formal education, material, cost, and retarded area.2)
Moreover, Indrayati states that long distance education is an education in
which the learning process is conducted by people in different place and
1) Handbill of Ministry of Home Affairs. No.440/2436/SJ. Jakarta, 17 March 2020.2)M. Atwi Suparman and Aminudin Zuhairi. Pendidikan Jarak Jauh (Teori dan Praktek).
Pusat penerbitan universitas terbuka departemen pendidikan nasional. March 2004. P. 8
13
time.3) This activity needs some instructional media such as, television,
radio, recording, telephone, and computer. In conclusion, long distance
education can be defined as learning process that is not needed the
classroom.
Long distance education does not need the classroom but need the
other media for instance internet, television, and mobile phone. These
media include to e-learning. Almarabeh says that e-learning is a learning
that uses information and communication technology such as internet,
mobile phone, learning management system, television, radio, and others
in order to enhance the teaching and learning activities.4) Generally, people
use internet and mobile phone in various applications for example,
whatsApp, google classroom, and zoom cloud meeting. Those all
applications are used to overcome educational problem during pandemic.
In fact, teachers and students are not already prepares about this system.
They were difficult to do the effective learning because they did not ever
have any experiences of learning process outside the classroom through e-
learning.
E-learning has two types. The first is synchronous. Synchronous is
a type of e learning that students and teacher do learning process at the
same time. The second is asynchronous. In asynchronous students can
learning any time. Hence, between synchronous and asynchronous has
3) Ibid.P. 74) Almarabeh, Tamara. Students’Perception of E-learning at The University of Jordan.
(iJET, Vol.9, Issue.3, 2014) P.31
14
different process in learning.
E-learning is one of the ways to make students still learning before
pandemic. The learning goals in learning process have the same goals even
thought different ways to learn. It means learning process by using e-
learning has the learning goals also. Learning goals can be measured
through three aspects. The first is cognitive aspect. In cognitive aspect the
teacher measure about activity in brain such as knowledge, comprehension,
application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The second is affective
aspect. In affective aspect that measured is about attitude and value. The
last is psychomotor aspect. Psychomotor aspects relate to skill and practice
after get the learning experience. It can be concluded, learning goals can
be measured through three aspects.
In cognitive, affective and psychomotor aspects are relates the way
teacher measure it. Assignment is one of the ways to measure three aspects
above. Assignment is important part in learning activity. Assignment can
show the student understanding about the material. Beside that the teacher
needs to give the feedback based on students’assignment.
According to Apreuebo in Windarsih state that Feedback is
information that athletes would receive from coach/trainer or environment
regarding the level of their motor skill or performance. It serves as a round
work for the athletes learning development. Feedback also can give the
certainty to students. It means students can get the feedback from their
assignment and they will know their assignment good or not.
15
Furthermore, learning English by using e-learning has the learning
goals likes learning in the class. To know learning goals has done achieve
or not the teachers needs to measure it. Measure the learning goals can be
done by measure three aspects. They are cognitive, affective and
psychomotor and to measure that teacher needs give the assignment. It can
be concluded to know the leaning goals can be reached or not the teacher
need tom measure all of the part of learning process.
In this education era learning process is doing by using some
electronic tool for instance using television, computer, and cell phone.
Based on online interview with some students at third grade in MAN 2
Padang Panjang almost student using cell phone with some application
there. The application they are use in learning English are zoom cloud
meeting, whatsApp, google foam, and youtube. According to the
explanation above about type of e-learning the application that students
use in learning English can be classified. Zoom cloud meeting and
WatsApp include in synchronous type. It caused the using of zoom coud
meeting and whatsApp appropriate with the definition of synchronous.
Google foam and youtube include in asynchronous. Because these
application used after the teacher give the command. It means these
application will students used after get the instruction to do something
from the teacher. It is usually after the time of their learning process
schedule. Thus, every application in cell phone that students use in
learning process can be categorized based on the use of application.
16
Based on online interview that researcher has done with some of
the students at third grade of MAN 2 Padang Panjang. There are some
problems in learning English by using e-learning. The first is about the
goals of learning English by using e-learning. It is supported by the teacher
statement “dengan menggunakan media dan aplikasi yang tersedia tujuan
pembelajaran tidak tercapai secara maksimal”.5) This statement is contrast
with a student opinion. It is can be seen by the student statement “aplikasi-
aplikasi yang digunakan memadai untuk menunjang pembelajaran”6). This
student said if the application that they use is useful. It means that students
can build their understanding about the material. The other hand student
said “kurang paham dengan pembelajaran dikarenakan tidak bisa bertanya
langsung dan kurang penjelasan”.7) It means when the students learn by
using internet they don’t have chance to ask everything like in the
classroom. It can be concluded some students think if e-learning can help
student to achieve the learning goals and some of them contrast of it.
The next problem is about the assignment. The researcher found
that the assignment is the problem in learning by using e-learning. It was
supported by the student statement “pemberian tugas kadang melalui file
dan video tidak ada penjelasan hanya langsung diberikan tugas ”8). It
5)Isra, S.Pd6) Putri Rasydah Muslim. Students of MA N 2 Padang Panjang. Personal Online Interview.
22 Juli 20207) Ariska Azizan. Students of MA N 2 Padang Panjang. Personal Online Interview. 22 Juli
2020
8)Afadil Arnandes Putra. Students of MA N 2 Padang Panjang. Personal Online Interview.22 Juli 2020
17
means the students sometime think they didn’t get the explanation about
their assignment. It caused the teacher just gives assignment without clear
instruction. In the other hand the other students contrast it“setelah
diberikan materi baru di berikan tugas dengan bentuk google form “.9) This
student said they get the assignment after given the material. It means
students can do the assignment well because have got the material first.
This statement is same with the teacher statement. It can be supported by
teacher statement “tugas di buku latihan di foto dan dikirim kan ke link
google form dan instruksi tugas di berikan d grups kelas masing-masing.
Furthermore, some student has the problem in the task that teacher given
because there is no clear instruction.
The last, in e-learning the researcher found that the teacher was
not maximum when give the feedback to every student. It supported by
student statement “karna memakai google form jadi tidak ada hasil dari
tugas nya dan gurupun tidak ada ngasih tau”.10) It means students think if
they did not get anything feedback from the teacher. It caused the teacher
just instruct the students to do assignment through google form. The other
students have the other opinion about the feedback from the teacher. It is
supported by the statement from the student. “sebagian di kasih sebagian
tidak”.11) This statement is same with teacher statement that said in the
9) Ariska Azizan. Students of MA N 2 Padang Panjang. Personal Online Interview. 22 Juli2020
10) Afadil Arnandes Putra. Students of MA N 2 Padang Panjang. Personal OnlineInterview. 22 Juli 2020
11) Putri Rasydah Muslim. Students of MA N 2 Padang Panjang. Personal Online
18
giving the feedback the teacher not always give the feedback. It caused
teacher think if student have the other assignment from the other subject of
study. Thus, some problem that researcher found by online interview.
Based on the different perception above the researcher is interested
to find out about students’perception in learning English by using e-
learning. Therefore the researcher will conduct a research under the title “
Students’Perception on Learning English by Using E-Learning at
Third Grade Students of MAN 2 Padang Panjang in Academic Years
2020/2021
B. Identification of The Problem
The background of the problem above signifies that there are some
problems found by the researcher:
1. E-learning used by teacher seems could not able to achieve learning
goals
2. Teacher gave the assignment with the unclear instruction
3. Teacher was not maximal or not efficient in giving feedback
C. Limitation of The Problem
Based on the identification of the problem above, the researcher
limits the problem to the learning English by using e-learning that relate to
learning goals, assignment, and feedback.
D. Formulation of The Problem`
Interview. 22 Juli 2020
19
The formulation of this research are :
1. What is students’perception on learning English by using e-
learning to achieve learning goals?
2. What is students’perception on learning English by using e-
learning about the assignment given by teacher?
3. What is students’perception on learning English by using e-
learning about feedback given by teacher?
E. Purpose of The Research
The purposes of this research are :
1. To know the students’perception on English learning goals by using
e-learning.
2. To know students’perception on learning English relate to the
assignment given by teacher.
3. To know students’perception on learning English by using e-
learning relate to the feedback given by teacher .
F. Significance of The Research
By doing this research is expected that the result can give
contributions as follow:
1. For researcher
This research can give contribution to the researcher in getting
experience and more knowledge.
2. For college
The researcher hopes that it will be useful to add the library sources
20
and as the reference to the next researcher.
G. Definition of Key Terms
The key terms used in this research are defined as follows:
1. Perception
Perception is a related process of brain and senses that will perceive
everything they get from the senses.
2. Learning English
Learning English is a process of the language learning especially
English language to build students knowledge skill about other
language.
3. E-learning
E-learning is a learning that uses electronic as a media in learning
process such as Television, Computer, and Mobile Phone.
21
BAB II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITELATURE
1. Review of Related Theory
A. The Nature of Students’Perception
a. Definition of Perception
Perception is a related process of brain and senses that will
perceive everything they get from the senses. According to
Desiderato in Jalaludin, perception is the experience about object,
incident, or something that relate to conclude the information and
interpret the message. Perception is a sensory stimulus that relate to
sensation. Meaning of sensory stimulus is not only involves
sensation it is also about attention, expectation, motivation, and
memory.12) Hence, perception is the experiment that gotten by
sensory stimulus.
According to Walgito, perception is the process that is
preceded by the sensory process.13) This process is continued to the
stimulus and then be the perception. Sensory stimulus is the first
process before perception process. Sensory processes by individual
happen every time. Individual get the stimuli of the five senses are
eyes to see, ears to hear, nose to smell, tongue to labeling, and skin
to feel. Thus, perception is the process that using senses.
12) Rahmat, Jalaludin. Paikologi Komunikasi, Edisi Revisi. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.Bandung, 2005. P. 51
13) Bimo Walgito. Pengantar Psikologi Umum.C.V ANDI OFFSET. Yogyakarta,Desember 2005. P. 99
22
According to Moskowitz and Orgel in Walgito, perception
is the integrated process in individual self based on stimulus that he
or she accepts.14) It said integrated process because process of
perception cannot happen without sensory stimulus process that
using five of senses. Perception is process of organization and
interpretation toward stimuli which they sensory to be something
important and it is the integrated respond in individual self. Thus,
perception in every human can be different each other.
According to Sarwono in Arifmoboy research, perception is
a process that individual used to appreciate their opinion and skill
to compare it with the other opinion and skill.15) Perception
everyone is different. It is caused they have different experiment.
Hence, the result of perception of the people is difference based on
their experiment. Besides, according to Young in Kuswana,
perception is a process of senses, integrate, and give the value to
physic objects or social object. This sensation depends on physic
stimuli and social stimuli around them.16)
Based on the explanation above perception is the integrated
process that using senses. The using of five the senses it is called
sensory stimulus. It is the process of seeing, hearing, smelling,
14) Ibid. p. 10015) Arifmiboy, Khairuddin. Persepsi Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IA IN
Bukittinggi Terhadap Penerapan Model Pmbelajaran Micro Teching Berbasis ICT. IA INBukittinggi. 2017. P. 96
16) Wowo Sunaryo Kuswana. Taksonomi Berfikir. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung,2011.P. 220
23
labeling, and hearing. Perception is integrated process based on
their experiment from senses. Perception is the process of cognitive,
affective. It caused the process of perception is the activity of brain.
Hence, perception can influence the learning process of the student
if they have good perception they will be good learner and if they
have bad perception it will influence their attitude when learning
process.
b. The Factors That Include in Perception
In process of perception have factors that influence this
process. According to Jalaludin There are 3 factors that including
in perception as follows:17)
1. Attention
According to Kennet in Jalaludin attention is a mental
process when stimuli or the series of stimuli become
prominent in self awareness at the same time the other stimuli
is weaken. The attention happens when individual concentrate
their self in the one of senses and ignore the other that come to
five of senses.
2. Object
Object surface the stimuli that concerning five of sense
or receptor.18) Stimuli come from inside or outside individual.
17) Rahmat Jalaludin. Paikologi Komunikasi, Edisi Revisi. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.Bandung, 2005. P. 52
18) Bimo Walgito. Pengantar Psikologi Umum.C.V ANDI OFFSET. Yogyakarta,
24
The most stimuli come from outside. Thus, object is one of
factor that include in perception.
3. Senses, neural, and the main structure of neural.19)
Senses or receptor is a tool to receipt the stimuli. Besides, it is
also needs sensory neural as a tool to continue the stimuli that
receptor receipt to the main structure of neural, and brain as the
main awareness. It is a tool to do respond that needs of motorist
neural. Thus, in process of perception have some factors there
are attention as requisite of psychologist, objects or stimulus
which their percept, senses and main structures of neural as a
fisiologis.
c. Process of Perception
Perception is not something that suddenly happens but
something that happens through a process. According to Miftah
Thoha in Arifmiboy and Khairuddin, there are some processes
in perception.20) First is stimulation. Perception happens when
the stimulation comes around them. Second is registration. In
the registration process the symptom that can see is a
mechanism physic as a sensory. Third is interpretation.
Interpretation is a cognitive aspect. It means give the meaning
Desember 2005. P. 10119) Bimo Walgito. Pengantar Psikologi Umum.C.V ANDI OFFSET. Yogyakarta,
Desember 2005. P. 10120) Arifmiboy, Khairuddin. Persepsi Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IA IN
Bukittinggi Terhadap Penerapan Model Pmbelajaran Micro Teching Berbasis ICT. IA INBukittinggi. 2017. P. 96
25
to the stimulus accepted. Interpretation process depends on
motivation and personality. Fourth is feedback. After
interpretation process the information that has accepted will be
perception become feedback to stimulation. Thus, there are
fourth processes in perception.
According to Walgito, process of perception begin with
stimuli arouse from the object, and go straight to the receptor
senses.21) Stimuli and object is different but object and stimuli
rarely will be united for example pressure. Thing as object will
go straight to the skin so that it can be sensed. Stimuli process
about senses as a process naturally or psychical process. The
stimuli receive by senses will continue to sensory neural and go
to the brain. This process is called as physiology process.
Process in brain as the main of awareness so individual know
that their see, hear, or feel. The processes which happen in the
brain or the main of awareness called psychological process. It
can be concluded the last process in the perception is individual
awareness about their see, hear, or their feel. Respond of
perception can get from individual in some form. In the
perception process needs attention as a way to percept. It
caused individual not only get one stimuli but many stimuli that
21) Bimo Walgito. Pengantar Psikologi Umum.C.V Andi Offset Yogyakarta, Desember 2005. P.102
26
arise around them.
d. Organization of perception
In organization or individual is related to the way
someone organized what they perceive. According to Walgito,
there are two kinds of organization in perception.22) The first is
primer organization. Primer organization is the way someone
percept part by part then totality. The last is secunder
organization. In secondary organization the way to perception
is from totality to part. For example, when people percept a
motorcycle. Some of them percept whole of motorcycle and
some of them percept certain part. It depends on individual.
Hence, when someone organized their perception there are two
differences organization.
e. Object of perception
Object is one of important part when people perceive
something. It caused people will not perceive something that
they do not know. Object of human perception is everything
they see, hear, smell, touch, and taste. Object that can be
perceived is everything around of human.23) People can be
object of perception. People can perception their own self. It is
22) Bimo Walgito. Pengantar Psikologi Umum.C.V ANDI OFFSET. Yogyakarta,Desember 2005. P. 101
23) Bimo Walgito. Pengantar Psikologi Umum.C.V ANDI OFFSET. Yogyakarta,Desember 2005. P. 108
27
called self-perception. There are two object of perception,
human and non-human. Human object it is called person
perception or social perception and non-human perception
called non-social perception or things perception. The
similarity of social perception and non-social perception is the
human as an object of thing that related time and place. The
differences of social and non-social, when perception is human
so the objects of perception have aspects like that perception
and this not happen in non social perception. Thus, objects of
perception are social perception and non-social perception.
f. Consistency in perception
People will consistent with their perception. It
supported by theory from Walgito. According to
Walgito, there are three consistences in perception.24)
1. Consistency of shape
Experience give the meaning that shape of coin is
circle. It is the result of perception. Coin is circle and it
save in their memory even their rarely see coin with the
other shape they will still think if coin is circle. The
result of perception not only gets from objective stimuli
only but individual that active in the result of perception.
24) Bimo Walgito. Pengantar Psikologi Umum.C.V ANDI OFFSET. Yogyakarta,Desember 2005. P. 109
28
Thus, this case is called consistency shape in perception.
2. Consistency of color
The people always think if milk is white color based
on their experience. When someone put milk in the red
room so milk be florid but she or he still think if milk is
white. People perception about milk based on their
experience always thinks milk is white. This is called as
a consistency of color.
3. Consistency of size
Experience give the meaning if animal that name
elephant is big. When someone sees elephant from far
distance elephant will see small. More far someone sees
elephant it will see smaller. Although, it is seen small
she or he perception still think if elephant is big. Hence,
this is named of consistency of size.
Consistency shape, color, and size gives the
illustration that when people perception something not
only definite from objective stimuli but that has in their
self involved will give the result of perception include
experience.
B. The Nature of Learning
a. Definition of learning
29
Learning is a process of getting the knowledge.
Learning can be happen in every way, every time, and every
moment. It caused in life people always learn from the small
thing until the big thing. Learning not always about cognitive
but many things that people gets from the other people or
their experience. Learning also can build people knowledge
and change the behavior. According to Slameto, based on
psychology learning is the process of the behavior change as
the result of interaction with the surrounding to complete
their life need.25) In the other hand, learning is process that
the people do to get a new behavior as a result from their
experience interaction from around them. Hence, learning is
the behavior changed.
b. Kinds of learning
In learning there are some kinds that happen in process
of learning. According to Slameto, there are eleven
kinds of learning.26)
1. Part learning is a way to learning part by part for
example a student learning a poem. In this material a
student will divide it in some part like read and the
25) Slameto. Belajar and Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi. PT Rineka Cipta. Jakarta2015. P. 2
26) Slameto. Belajar and Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi. PT Rineka Cipta. Jakarta2015. P. 5
30
motion when read a poem. As the opponent of part
learning is global whole learning.
2. Learning by insight. According to Gesalt theory
insight as a process organized patterns of behavior that
relate with how to solve a problem.
3. Discriminative learning can be define as an effort to
chose some situation or stimuli and then be a compass
in behavior.
4. Global whole learning is a way to learn whole of the
material until they master it.
5. Incidental learning is a learning that does not have a
instruction that given to individual about the material
will learn later.
6. Instrumental learning in this kind reaction of student
can be seen by some sign that direct to the student gets
gift, punish, and succeed or failed.
7. Intentional learning is a kind that antipodes with
incidental learning.
8. Latent learning is a learning that changes the
behavior not automatically but need a process.
9. Mental learning is a learning that changes the
behavior someone based on something that they do.
10. Productive learning is a learning that transfers a
31
behavior from one situation to the other situation.
Learning can be said productive if individual can
transfer a principle how to solve the problem in one
situation to other situation.
11. Verbal learning is learning about verbal material
with do the exercise and memorizing.
c. The factors that influence learning
In learning process have some factors that will influence
the learning. It caused process of learning need the time so
when learning process occur has a something that will
influenced it. According to Slameto, there are two factors
that influenced learning.27) The first internal factor, internal
factor is a factor that has in student self. The last is external
factor, external factor is a factor come from surroundings of
student.
There are three internal factors. The first is bodily factor.
The health of someone is influential to her or his learning.
The second is psychology. In psychology have seven
factors that influenced learning. The factors are:
intelligence, attention, interest, aptitude, motive, ripeness,
preparedness. The last is fatigue factor. In fatigue factor
27) Slameto. Belajar and Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi. PT Rineka Cipta. Jakarta2015. P. 54
32
there are two factors fatigue in physical and fatigue in
psychological. Thus, in internal factor have three factors
that influenced.
In factor external have three factors. Family, in family
that influenced are how parent give the education, link in
family, situation at home, the family economy, and the
background of culture. School became factor of learning
because school is one of place to get do leaning process.
Society is one of factor that can build behavior of student.
Thus, external factor that influence learning has three.
d. The ways to effective learning
Effective is a good condition or comfortable condition.
In learning process people need a good condition to build
learning process that effective. Effective learning can be
occurred through some ways. Slameto said, three ways to
make effective learning.28) To build effectiveness learning
needs a leadership. It caused besides give the directed how
to learn the student also get the control. It can make the
result of learning process better. The next is condition and
learning strategy. The effectiveness learning can help
student to improve their skill that appropriate with
28) Slameto. Belajar and Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi. PT Rineka Cipta. Jakarta2015. P. 73
33
instructional. To improve it needs the good condition and
good learning strategy. The last is learning method. Method
is the way that passed to reach certain goal. Learning has a
purpose to get knowledge, attitude, and skill. A habit in
learning will influenced learning itself. Hence, effective
learning can build with apply three ways above.
C. The Nature of E-learning
a. Definition of E-learning
E-learning is a learning process that use electronic as a
learning media for instance mobile phone, internet, and etc.
According to Almarabeh, e-learning is a learning that uses
information and communication technology such as internet,
mobile phone, learning management system, television,
radio, and others in order to enhance the teaching and
learning activities.29) According to Almarabeh, E-learning is
a unifying termed to describe the fields of online learning,
web-based training and technology delivered instructions.
Jenkins and Hanson in Almarabeh, indicated that E-learning
facilitated and supported the learning process through
information and communication technologies. According to
29) Almarabeh, Tamara. Students’Perception of E-learning at The University of Jordan.(iJET, Vol.9, Issue.3, 2014) P.31
34
Maslin in Almarabeh, defined E-learning is when use
information and communication technologies (ICTs) for
knowledge seeking or delivering we refer this method as E-
learning.30) Thus, E-learning is a technology tool that used
internet to learning.
Rosenberg in Meirani states that E-learning refers to the
use of Internet technologies to deliver a broad array of
solutions that enhance knowledge and performance. E-
learning can be used in almost every level of education,
especially higher education. It can be an effective way for
students to explore knowledge more than what they can get
from a class room. E-learning is also called Web-based
learning, online learning, distributed learning, computer-
assisted instruction, or Internet-based learning.
According to Claire, E-learning as the use of online tools
designed to help or improve student learning such as can
download the material and other resources in learning
experience.31) Besides, according to Boumans in Ogbona
and Ibezim, e-learning as an umbrella term describes any
type of learning that depends on or is enhanced by
30) Ibid.P.31
31) Claire Loh David H Wong Ali Quazi Russel Philip Kingshot. Re-Examining Students’Perception of E-learning: an A ustralian Perspective. International Journal of EducationalManagement. Vol.30 ISS.1 PP. P.
35
electronic communication using the latest information and
communication technologies (ICT).32) It is also defined
Hambrecht in Ogbona and Ibezim e-learning as a generic
term covering a wide range of ICT technology-based
applications and processes, including computer-based
learning, web-based learning, virtual classrooms, digital
collaboration and networking. According to Garrison and
Kanuka, define e-learning as web-enabled teaching and
learning.33) E-learning can be defined as learning facilitate
and supported by using information and communications
technology.
According to Chen et al in Liu, explained e-learning as
applying networks to facilitate learning, including the
production, delivery, and acquisition of learning contents,
the management of learning experiences, and the exchange
between learning communities.34) Different from traditional
learning, e-learning integrates all activities related to
learning, such as the production of teaching materials and
32) Ogbonna , Ibezim, and Obi. Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching
word processing: A n experimental approach. South A frican Journal of Education, V olume 39,
Number 2, May 2019. P. 2
33) Ibid34) Hsu Kuan (Jonathan) Liu. Correlation Research on the A pplication of E-Learning to -
Regulated Learning A bility, MotivationalBeliefs, and A cademic Performance . Eurasia Journal ofMathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2016, 12(4), 1091-1100. P. 1093
36
their delivery, as arching of data in libraries, registration,
and paying fees, through information technologies of the
Internet, Web-Service, and databases. According to the
report of the US WR Hambrecht, Hwang et al in Liu,
classified e-learning into computer-assisted learning, online
learning, e-learning, and distance learning:
1. Computer-assisted learning was a sub-set of online
learning, which compacted communication contents in CDs
or floppy disks.
2. Online learning, as a sub-set of learning, compacted
communication contents in the Internet and the internal
network of a company.
3. E-learning, as a sub-set of distance learning, generally
referred to all learning methods transmitting contents
through electronic media, including the Internet, internal
network of a company, satellite, tapes, video tapes, and
interactive TV and CDs.
4. Distance learning was an educational context when
teachers and students were separated because of time or
space limitations. The education or training courses were
delivered synchronously or asynchronously, including
emails, text, figures, sound, video tapes, CDs, online
learning, video conferencing, interactive TV, and facsimile,
37
to a distant location.
From definitions above it can be concluded e-
learning is an online tool that use to learn. E-learning can
be said learning that use technology. Likes, computer,
internet, video conference online. Thus, e-learning is
learning process by using online technology.
b. Modes of E-learning
Mode is a form or type. Mode in E-learning has two.
They are distance learning and computer assisted
instruction that usually people use. According to Ruiz in
Meirani stated, there have been two common e-learning
modes: distance learning and computer assisted instruction.
35) Distance learning uses information technologies to
deliver instruction or materials to learners who are at
remote locations from a central site. Computer assisted
instruction also called computer-based learning and
computer based training uses computers to aid in the
delivery of stand-alone multimedia packages for learning
and teaching. These two modes are subsumed under e-
learning as the Internet becomes the integrating technology.
36) Hence, Elearning have two modes distance learning and
35) Meirani, Harsasi. The Use of Open Educational Resources in Online Learning: AStudy of Students’Perception. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE July 2015ISSN 1302-6488 Volume: 16 Number: 3 Article 6.p. 76
38
computer assisted instruction.
c. Type of E-learning
In E-learning not only has the mode but has the type
also. Type or kind in Elearning has two. They are
Asynchronous and synchronous. According to Mahanta
and Ahmed, there are two types interaction between
learner and tutor or learner and learner in e-learning.37)
The first one is synchronous interaction. In this type
require all the participants of online interaction at the
same time. Examples include internet voice telephone,
video teleconferencing, text based chat system, text based
virtual learning environment, and net based virtual
auditorium or lectures room system. The second one is
asynchronous interaction. In this type all of participant
have freedom of time and location to participate it.
Examples include e-mail, discussion forum, and bulletin
board system. Thus, synchronous and asynchronous are
type interaction of e-learning.
1. Synchronous
According to Fita et al, synchronous virtual e-
36)ibid. P. 7637)Devajit Mahanta, Majidul Ahmed. E-Learning Objectives, Methodologies, Tools
and its Limitatio. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering(IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-2, Issue-1, December 2012. P. 48
39
learning tools are those intended for online studies
that permit the real-time interaction between students
and teachers using some kind of communication
channel, like chat, voice or videoconferencing.38) SVL
tools create a virtual classroom in which students may
ask and teachers can reply instantly, making learning
a so-called synchronous experience. As compared
with asynchronous e-learning tools, the student
experience that they are not taking lessons alone,
rather they can interact with other classmates and their
teachers during the class.
Furthermore, synchronous Virtual e-Learning tools
(SVL), also known as webinar tools, can overcome
this limitation as they provide, for instance, the
opportunity to watch the teacher and talk to him/her
share documents instantly and directly follow what
the teacher types onto the computer (as in a e-
blackboard).39) Therefore, synchronous tools are able
to provide an experience similar to that of a regular
class or a meeting, and are useful for tutorships, on-
38) Ana Fita , Jose F. Monserrat , Germán Moltó , Eva M. Mestre , Adrián Rodriguez-Burruezo. Use of Synchronous e-Learning at University Degrees. Computer A pplications inEngineering Education.p. 4
39) Ibid. p.4
40
line courses, regular courses (for students who cannot
physically attend the class), or seminars provided by
colleagues in videoconferencing format. International
companies worldwide are adopting SVL, not only for
meetings but also for training and refresher courses
aimed at their employees, being webinars more and
more common. With these tools, companies save on
travelling expenses and can access knowledge and
technology in an efficient way.
Karen et al state that, synchronous learning is live,
real-time (and usually scheduled), facilitated
instruction and learning-oriented interaction.40) I’ve
emphasized “learning-oriented interaction”in order to
differentiate synchronous learning from lecture,
product demonstrations, and other “knowledge
dispersal”activities. my opinion (backed by plenty of
research findings),the interaction is essential to
learning. Thus, synchronous e-Learning is
synchronous learning that takes place through
electronic means.
2. Asynchronous
40) By Karen Hyder, Ann Kwinn, Ron Miazga, and Matthew Murray. Handbook onSynchronous e-Learning. The eLearning Guild’s. 375 E Street,Suite 200 Santa Rosa,CA 95404,2007. P. 1
41
Papachristos et al explained asynchronous means
that the students can interact at any time without
teacher presence.41) Most of online course use this
type. It caused asynchronous can used everywhere,
every time that make the learner more flexible to learn.
This type gives the freedom for learner to participate
the learning process for instance, freedom time of
time and place.
d. The advantages of e-learning
Every learning media has the advantage. The
advantage of learning media is different. It is depend on
the necessary. Tudorache et al explained, from the main
advantages of e-learning are the possibility of work in a
flexible way regarding other home activities, the
reducing of time and money spent on travelling from
home to school, e-learning gives to students the
possibility of taking the responsibility for being treated.
42) It is essential for an adult to be responsible for his
own actions. On the other hand, another big advantage
41) D. Papachristos , N. Alafodimos , K. Arvanitis , K. Vassilakis , M. Kalogiannakis , P.Kikilias , E. Zafeiri. A n Educational Model for A synchronous E-Learning. A case study in HigherTechnology Education. P. 32.
42)Ionela-Catalina Tudorache, Ana-Maria Mihaela Iordache, Mihai-Tiberiu Iordache. TheA dvantages and The Disadvantages of E-learning in European Union. JISOM. 2006.
42
is that students can work at their own place, or
anywhere they have access to a computer. This is very
important because it creates the proper environment for
the student to work, some of them might be shy
working in groups or coming to school study. The final
advantage is very important due to the manner in which
the students are being treated. It is essential for an adult
to be responsible for his own actions.
On the other hand, another big advantage is that
students can work at their own place, or anywhere they
have access to a computer. This is very important
because it creates the proper environment for the
student to work, some of them might be shy working in
groups or coming to school.
e. The disadvantages of e-learning
Learning media also has disadvantage. According to
Tudorache et al, there are some disadvantages.43) The
main obstacle for e-Learning is that the students "with
low motivation or bad study habits may fall behind".
Some students are comfortable with the classic way of
43) Ionela-Catalina Tudorache, Ana-Maria Mihaela Iordache, Mihai-Tiberiu Iordache. TheA dvantages and The Disadvantages of E-learning in European Union. JISOM. 2006.
43
learning: going to school, answer is class, be active, and
be motivated by teachers to study harder. This motivation
is usually concretized into bonus points, good grades or
other benefits (even candies or sweets). This is the main
reason that makes the eLearning a little bit dangerous:
some active and social students may lose their motivation
of studding.
Another disadvantage is also met at psychological point
of view and it is about isolation. Some students may feel
isolated from the teacher and other students. This
isolation may create a long-term barrier of
communication.
f. Learning goals
Learning goal is a purpose of the learning process or
something that should be reached after learning process by
students. it is also occur in e-learning. According to Dweck and
Legget in Froiland said students who have learning goals or
mastery goals are much more likely to enjoy learning than are
those who are focused primarily on avoiding failure or getting
good grades. Besides that Kover and Worrel in Froiland also
stated that students who emphasize learning goals also obtain
higher Grades than do students who focus on their performance.44)
44) John Mark Froiland. INTRINSIC MOTIV A TION, LEA RNING GOALS,
44
In learning goals there are three domains that teachers’need
to identify. The first is cognitive domain. Cognitive domain is the
domain that includes brain activity. Taxonomy Bloom in
Nurbudiyani states there are six stages in thinking process.45)
There are knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis,
synthesis, and evaluation.46) The purpose of measure cognitive
domain is to get accurate information about achievement in
instructional purpose. Cognitive domain can be measured through
two kinds of test. There are subjective test or essay test and
objective test. The next is affective domain. According David R
Kratwohl in Nurbudiyani said affective domain is the domain that
relates to attitude and value.47) Depdiknas 2008 in Nurbudiyani
states five main characteristics in this domain there are attitude,
interest, self-concept, value, and morality.48) The last is
psychomotor domain. This domain is the domain that relates to
skill. In psychomotor domain there are three processes to measure
this domain. According to Ryan in Nurbudiyani states there are
during learning and teaching process, after learning process, and
several times after learning process.49) Hence there are three
ENGAGEMENT,A ND A CHIEV EMENT IN A DIV ERSE HIGH SCHOOL. Psychology in theSchools,V ol.53(3),2016
45) Iin Nurbudiyani. PELA KSA NAA N PENGUKURAN RA NA H KOGNITIF, A FEKTIF,DA N PSIKOMOTOR PA DA MA TA PELA JA RA N IPS KELA S III SD MUHA MMADIY AHPA LA NGKARA Y A . A nterior Jurnal. V ol.13 (1). Desember 2013. P.89
46) Ibid47)Ibid. P. 9048) Ibid
45
domains that must be measured to know the students learning
goals can be reached or not.
g. Assignment
Assignment is one of important part in learning process.
Generally, teacher will give the assignment when learning process
and it can be given based on the material that learned. Assignment
can improve students’understanding the material, make teacher
knows the students achievement, and can build the feeling to learn
the material more. Moh. Uzer Usman in SutrIyah states that
assignment is the way to show the material with give the certain
assignment in time that has given and the student responsibility it.
50) According to Wijaya Kusuma In Sutriyah state that the
assignment is good if as the purpose to make students
understanding deeply after learning, train the students to
independent learning, the students can divide the time continuity,
the students can utilize unoccupied of time to do the assignment,
train student to do the assignment well by their self, build the
3experience out of school.51) According to Rositiyah in Sutriyah
there are some steps to give the assignment. The first, formulates
49)ibid.p. 9150) Sutryah. Pengaruh Metode Pemberian Tugas dengan Bimbingan Guru Terhadap
Kompetensi Menjahit Blazer. Yogya karta 2012.p. 1151)Ibid
46
the specific purpose. The next, consider the technique to give the
assignment. The last, formulate the assignment that easy to
understand and comprehend.52) Hence, assignment can build
students more understanding about the material but the assignment
that too much it can build students feel bored.
According to Roseshine in to give the effective assignment
the teacher should appropriate the total of student, ability of
student, and kinds of assignment that given.53) According to
Sumantri and Permana in Suci there are some factors that
influence to implement giving the assignment.54) First is the clarity
of assignment that given. Second is the appropriate with student
level cognitive. The next is considers to students’differences
includes intelligent, interest, motivation, talent, gender, and habit.
The next is book sources. The last is the skill of teacher to
distribute the assignment. Thus, teacher needs to consider some
factors above to give the assignment and those ways can be
implemented in e-learning assignment.
The assignment in e-learning has some form that can be
used for instance by using google form, search some material from
the google, or watch the video from youtube. Those examples of
52) Ibid. p. 1353) Siska Prawati. Penerapan Metode Pemberian Tugas Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil
Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPS . Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako Online. Vol.4, No.1. P.654) Suci Erningsih. Kefektifan Pengggunaan Metode Pemberian Tugas dan Retirasi
dengan Model Pembelajaran Investigasi Kelompok Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi BelajarSejarah. Universitas Negri Semarang. 2019.
47
the form the assignment that teacher give to student. In the way
give the assign most of teacher gives the instruction based on the
application in their mobile phone or computer used.
h. Feedback
Feedback in learning is defined as information that is
communicated to students that aims to change the thinking or
behavior to improve the learning process. Giving feedback by
teachers in teaching is an important activity to improve their
knowledge and acquisition capabilities, accomplishments, and
motivate learners. The characteristics of effective feed-back in
learning must be non-evaluative, supportive, timely, and specific.
Feedback provided in the form of learning on the learner
information in response to action learning activities that have been
carried out. Feedback can be presented in various forms, for
example in the form of verification of the accuracy of the answers,
an explanation of the correct answer, instructions and examples as
well as performed at any time during the learning process, such as
it provides answers, or after a certain time lag. According to Hattie
and Timperley in Kasenda states that feedback from the teacher
can bring many profits in learning process for the students.
Winnie and Butler in Kasenda also states the success and better
learning process can be obtained from the feedback. It is like a
48
comment about the students’out comes.55)It can be concluded
feedback is the one of important part in learning process.
According to Maria at all state that there are four semantic
dimensions of feedbacks.56) The first is Error identification and
correction. The feedback informs about the correction of errors
made. The second is correct answer. The feedback shows the
correct answer or gives the right solution. The third is task
improvement. The feedback recommends contents and strategies
in order to improve the work, or the test that has been submitted.
The last is in-depth information. The feedback suggests in-depth
information in order to continue to move forward in learning in
the future. It can be concluded in feedback there are four semantic
dimensions.
According to Arifmiboy there are three ways to give
feedback.57) The first is verbal. Verbal feedback as a respond that
teacher given to student with oral for instances good job, great,
and the others accolade words. The second is non verbal feedback.
It is a feedback with the activity and signs that relate to students
55) Kasenda, Amalia, and Ardaniah. Students’Errors and Teachers’Oral CorrectiveFeedback in Teaching Speaking Skills at SDN Wonorejo 274 Surabaya. Mozaik Humaniora,Vol.19 (1),109.123. 2019
56) Maria at all. Usefulness of feedback in e-learning from the students’perspective.Intangiable Capital. IC,2015 –11(4): 627-645 –Online ISSN: 1697-9818 –Print ISSN: 2014-3214.
57)Arifmiboy. Pedoman Tdaluring Microteaching Learning Model (TMLM).Bukittinggi.2017. P. 19
49
learning process for instance give the gift or cheerful axpression.
The last is variation feedback. In this way the teacher combine
both of the feedback. Hence, there are three ways to give the
feedback to student.
The problem in distance education is not the technology
format, but the teaching and support from the instructor.
Feedback could provide learners the outcome information
regarding the correctness of the teachers’response and
additional information regarding the nature of outcomes
and the qualities of their cognitive processing. In online
course, the instructor’s presence with giving feedback has
the potential to reduce the insecurity of lonely study keep
awareness of learning purpose and improve self-
confidence and self-esteem of students.
According to Ross in Article CALL there are three
characteristics of feedback quality provided by the teacher,
first, feedback should be timely. Second, feedback should
be helpful. Last, feedback should be developing.58) Hence,
Feedback is the most important factor of many kind of
communication, especially in learning. While designing
58) Goerge Ypsitandi. Goerge Ypsilandis. Feedback in Distance Education. Aristotle University ofThessaloniki. Article CALL.2010
50
and implementing learning activities teachers need to be
very aware of providing good feedback. In distance
learning also e-learning the feedback has more
importance because the lack of face to face interaction.
D. Review of Related Study
In support this research, there are several studies about e-
learning which was conducted by some researchers. The first, the
research by Almarabeh entitled “Students’Perception of E-learning
at University Jordan”.59) This research is descriptive quantitative
research. This research to k now students’perception of using e-
learning based on technology accepting. The result of this research
the students are highly qualified and accepting the E-learning
system with the desire to use it in more advanced manner. Thus,
using e-learning in learning process is good for student to highly
qualified and accepting it.
The second, the research by Ogbona et al entitled “
Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word
processing: An experimental approach”60) In this research the
researcher used quasi experimental design with pre-test and post
59) Almarabeh, Tamara. Students’Perception of E-learning at The University of Jordan.(iJET, Vol.9, Issue.3, 2014
60) Ogbonna , Ibezim, and Obi. Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teachingword processing: A n experimental approach. South A frican Journal of Education, V olume 39,Number 2, May 2019.
51
test. The result of this research revealed that both synchronous and
asynchronous e-learning significantly increased student
achievement and skills acquisition in word processing irrespective
of the gender of the students. It can be concluded that e- learning
had positive effect on academic achievement of students enrolled in
the subject of education.
The last, a research conducted by Sun et al entitled ”What
drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the
critical factors influencing learner satisfaction.”61) This study
discussed about the identified critical factors influencing e-
Learners’satisfaction. The result of this study indicated that were
some factors that influenced e-learners satisfaction.”Hence, e-
learners’satisfaction can be influenced some factors.
Based on the researches conducted above, the differences
between this research and those researches above are: the first
research to know students at Jordan perception by using e-learning
whereas this research to know students’perception in learning
English by using e-learning at MAN 2 Padang Panjang. The second
research to compare both synchronous and asynchronous e-
learning whereas in this research to know student perception. The
61) Pei-ChenSun , Ray J. Tsai , Glenn Finger , Yueh-Yang Chen , DowmingYeh. Whatdrives a successful e-Learning?A n empirical investigation of the critical factors influencinglearner satisfaction.Elsevier. Received 16 August 2006; received in revised form 20 November2006; accepted 22 November 2006.
52
last research is about what drives successful e-learning. The
similarity of this research to other researches above is investigate E
-learning. Besides, the place of this research is in MAN 2 Padang
Panjang which differs from the other researches.
A. Conceptual Framework
The framework of the research is conceptually illustrated in the following
figure 2.1:Students’Perception on learning English by using E-learning
The Assignment
First is the clarity ofassignment that given. Secondis the appropriate with studentlevel cognitive. The next isconsiders to students’differences includes intelligent,interest, motivation, talent,gender, and habit. The next isbook sources. The last is theskill of teacher to distribute theassignment.
Sumantri and Permanain Suci, 2019
Feedback
There are three ways togive the feedback firstverbal, second non verbaland last variety feedback.
Arifmiboy, 2017
Learning Purpose
To know the learning
purpose can be
reached or not there
are three aspects
needed to measure.
1. Cognit ive aspect
2. Affective aspect
3. Psychomotor
aspect
Worrel in Froiland,2016
Instrument
According to Desiderato in Jalaludin, perception is the experienceabout object, incident, or something that relate to conclude theinformation and interpret the message.
Desiderato in Jalaludin
53
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD
A. Design of the Research
The design of this research used survey research. Gay, Mills, and Airasian
states that survey research is the research that involves collecting data to test
hypothesis or to answer questions about people’s opinions on some topic or
issue.62) Moreover, Gay. Mills, and Airasian also explain that a survey
research can be used to gather information about a group’s beliefs, attitudes,
behaviors, and demographic composition. Survey data are collected by asking
members of a population a set of questions, which can be administered in a
questionnaire that is mailed or emailed or in an interview over the phone or in
person.63) Hence, survey research is a research that is used to get the
information about people opinions, beliefs and also perceptions. This is the
reason of the researcher to collect information about students’perception in
learning English through e-learning.
B. The Population and Sample
Finding
Data Analysis
62) L.R. Gay, Geoffrey. E Mills, and Peter. W. Airasian, Educational Research(Competences for A nalysis and A plication Tenth Edition) Pearson Education. P. 183
63) Ibids. P. 185
54
1. Population
Population is one of the essential things in conducting the research.
Sugiyono states that population defined as a general area that consist of
object and subject which has quality and certain characteristic
determined by the researcher to be concluded.64) The population of
this research is the total students of third grade of IPA classes at MAN
2 Padang Panjang in academic years 2020/2021. The population is
described in the following table:
Table 3.1 : The Population of Third Grade of IPA Classes Students
at MAN 2 Padang Panjang in Academic years 2020/2021.
No Class Total of Students1. XI IPA 1 252. XI IPA 2 293. XI IPA 3 294. XI IPA 4 28
Total 111
Source : The School Administration Staff
The table above signifies that the population of this research is 111
students. It is the total of third grade of IPA classes students at Man 2
Padang Panjang in academic years 2020/2021.
2.Sample
Sample is a part of population. According to Sugiyono sample is a
part of amount and characteristic that has the population.65) There are
64) Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.Bandung: Alfabeta, Maret, 2016. P. 117
65) Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.Bandung: Alfabeta, Maret, 2016. P. 118
55
some techniques in determining the sample. The researcher used
incidental sampling to determine the sample. According to Sugiyono
explain that incidental sampling is a sample in which the sample taken
from the population based on incident or all of the population who can
be the sample.66) In this research the researcher used incidental
sampling to take sample. The sample will be taken 25% from the
population and 25% of 110 = 28.
Table 3.2 : The Sample of Third Grade of IPA Classes Students at
MAN 2 Padang Panjang in Academic years 2020/2021.
No Class Total of Students Sample1. XI IPA 1 25 72. XI IPA 2 29 73. XI IPA 3 29 74. XI IPA 4 28 7
Total 111 28
C. Instrument
Instrument is a tool in collecting the data. According to Suharsimi
in Sudaryono, Margono, and Rahayu, instrumentation of collecting the
data is a tool that is chosen and used by the researcher in order to make
the research systematic and simple.67) The researcher used the
questioner as the instrument. According to Gay, Mills, and Airasian,
66) Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.Bandung: Alfabeta, Maret, 2017. P. 82
67)Sudarsono, Gaguk Mrgono, and Wardani Rahayu. Pengembangan Intrumen PenelitianPendidikan. (Y ogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2013) p. 104
56
surveys generally takes one of the two forms questioners and
interviews.68) It means that the questioner can be used to collect the
data in this research. The instrument that is used in this research is the
questioner in which created to identify students’perception in learning
English through e-learning. The questioner used Likert Scale. Likert
Scale is used to measure attitude, opinion, and perception from
individual or group about social phenomenon.69) The answer each item
of instrument that use Likert Scale has negative and positive statement.
Table 3.3 Likert Scale
Likert Scale CodeScore ofPositive
Statement
Score ofNegative
StatementSelalu SL 5 1Sering SR 4 2Jarang JR 3 3
Kadang-kadang KD 2 4Tidak pernah TD 1 5
Source: Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan
Kuantitatif , Kualitatif , dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, Maret, 2016. P. 135
Validity is the properness of a test to measure what should be
measured in accordance to the particular criteria.Validity is used to know
how far the instrument valid to be applied in the research. According to
Siregar, validity indicates how far the instrument is able to measure what
should be measured.70)To measure validity of the test, the researcher will
68) L.R. Gay, Geoffrey. E Mills, and Peter. W. Airasian, Educational Research(Competences for A nalysis and A plication Tenth Edition) Pearson Education. P. 186
69) Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.Bandung: Alfabeta, Maret, 2016. P. 134
57
use expert judgment validity. It is used to measure the validity of the
questioner by the researcher. It can be concluded that if the items is valid
so that the items can be used in measuring students’perception in learning
English by using e-learning.
D. Technique of Data Collection
In collecting the data the researcher gave the questioner to the
student. In giving questioner the researcher did the following step:
1. Gave the online questioner to the students.
2. The explanation about questioner have given together with the
instruction to do the questioner.
3. Gave the time to fill the questioner.
4. The researcher correction the online questioner.
E. Technique of Data Analysis
In analyzing the data researcher used descriptive quantitative.
Arikunto explains that there are some processes to analyze the data.
The step is as the following:71)
1. Tabulate the data by using tallies.
2. Calculate the percentage of the data. Percentage technique is by
using a formula which is as the following:
P=fnx100%
70)Syofian Siregar. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada MediaGroup, 2013) p.46
71)Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pedekatan Praktek, P. 245-246.
58
P= percentage
f= frequency of total score
n= number of respondent
3. The finding mean of the data by using formula suggested
Subana as follow:
Mx= mean
N=total of percentage
n= Amount of item
4. Drawing the conclusion
The researcher concluded about students’ perception in
learning English by using e-learning, and interpreted the data
based on percentage range from I’Anatut Thoifah.72)
Table 3.4 Interpretation data from I’Anatut Thoifah
Percentage Explanation
81% - 100% Very Good61% - 80% Good41% - 60% Enough21% - 40% Poor0% - 20% Very Poor
72) I’Anatut Thoifah. Statistika Pendidikan dan Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif.Madani.Malang.2015. p. 42
59
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH FINDING
A. Finding
In this section, the researcher explains what the researcher found during
the research by analyzed and interpreted the data to answer the research question.
It was about the perceptions of the students on learning English by using e-
learning that relate to learning goals, assignment, and feedback by using E-
learning. The finding is intended to know students’perception by using E-learning
on learning English at third grade IPA Class of Man 2 Padang Panjang in
Academic Years 2020/2021.
The collected data of this research is based on percentage from students’
answer of the questioner. The questionnaire consists of 30 items where the answer
has been provided to be chosen by the respondents. The questionnaire has been
spread to 28 respondents. The data descriptions of the students’perception on
learning English by using E-learning as follows.
60
1. Description of The Data
This research was conducted in MAN 2 Padang Panjang at Third Grade of
IPA classes and 28 sample from the 25% of population. The researcher used
online questioner to collect the data. The final research of the data is numerical
data because the kind of the research was survey research through descriptive
quantitative.
The data was in form questionnaire which relates to students’answer in
questionnaire. In distributing the online questionnaire, the researcher gave
explanation and time to the students to answer the questionnaire honestly. The
researcher found the description of the students’perception on learning English by
using E-learning.
The first step after the researcher got the data, the researcher calculated the
frequencies and the percentages of each indicator. To find the percentages of each
question, the researcher use the formula which is proposed by Anatutoifah. After
got the percentages of the each statement, the researcher found the frequencies for
every statement in the questionnaire to got the percentage the final result. More
detailed description of the students’perception on learning English by using E-
learning could be seen on the chart below.
According to the research question about the students’perception on
learning English by using E-learning the researcher described with general
explanation. Students’perception on learning English by using E-learning have
chosen into three indicators. There are learning purpose, assignment, and feedback.
61
According to the students’answer for questionnaire there are 30 questions
for students’perception on learning English by using E-learning. The chart below
shows the percentage of three indicators and each indicator with different level of
frequency. The description of the data about students’perception on learning
English by using E-learning at third grade of MAN 2 Padang Panjang are as
follow:
The Chart 4.1 : General Percentage of Students’Answer
Source: research data
The chart above explained the total percentage of the students’
perception on learning English by using E-learning. The highest was
learning purpose (72,29%), assignment (70,28%) and the lowest was
feedback (60,3%). The percentage was gotten by finding the average
of each indicator that chosen by the students. The total percentage
above would be revealed further in the analysis of the data. For more
62
detail description in each frequency, the chart above divide
frequencies into always, often, sometime, seldom, and never.
Based on the interpretation data in chapter three learning
purpose and assignment was good category, and feedback was
enough category.
2. Analysis the Data
Analyzing of the data is useful to answer the research
question in this research. The question is answered by analyzing
the questionnaire. The items in questioner were 10 for learning
purpose, 10 for assignment, and 10 for feedback. Each item had
five options. There are always, often, sometime, seldom, and
never. The researcher analyzed the data through finding
percentage and mean of the data.
Based on the questionnaires of respondent answered, the
researcher found how the level of students’perception on
learning English by using E-learning at third grade of MAN 2
Padang Panjang. The result of the respondent answer could be
seen in the following chart below:
a. Learning purpose
The first is Learning Purpose. In learning purpose consist of
three domains. There are cognitive domain, psychomotor doain,
and affective domain. The detailed description in frequencies of
63
learning purpose it can be seen in the chart below:
Chart 4.1
The Percentage of Students’Perception on Learning English by
Using E-Learning Related to Learning Purpose
Source: research data
Based on table of learning purpose above described the
percentage of learning purpose. There are three domains of
learning purpose. The first was cognitive domain with 76,25%.
The next was psychomotor domain with 71, 95%, and the last was
affective domain with 60%. The higher percentage was cognitive
domain with 76,25%. The lowest percentage was affective domain
64
with 60%. The mean of this indicator was 69,4%. It can be
concluded the students’perception on learning English by using E
-learning related to learning purpose was good based on
interpretation data 61% - 80% was good.
b. Assignment
The second indicator is Assignment. In this indicator consist of
the clarity, consider the student differences, and skill to distribute the
assignment. The detailed of the percentage from assignment can be
seen on the chart below:
Chart 4.3
The Percentage of Students’Perception on Learning English by Using E-
Learning Related to Assignment
65
Source : Research Data
Based on chart above students’perception on learning English by using E-
learning consist of four aspects should be consider on the learning process related
to assignment. There are clarity with 70%, level of cognitive with 67,48%, student
differences with 67,2%, and skill to distribute the assignment with 72,2%. The
highest percentage was skill to distribute the assignment with 72,2% and the
lowest percentage was consider to the student differences with 67,2%. The mean
of this indicator was 69,22%. It can be concluded the students’perception on
learning English by using E-learning relate to assignment was good category
based on the interpretation data 61% - 80% was good category.
c. Feedback
The last indicator is feedback. In giving feedback there are two aspect
about that. The first the way give and the second the feedback verbal, non verbal
and variety. It can be seen on the chart below:
Chart 4.4
The Percentage of Students’Perception on Learning English by Using E-
Learning Related to Feedback
66
Source : Research Data
Based on chart above students’perception on learning English by using E-
learning related to feedback consist of two aspects should be consider on the
learning process. There are the way to give the feedback with 58,84%, and kind of
feedback with 60,44%. The mean of this indicator was 59,64%.it means the
percentage of this indicator included to the enough category. It is caused in the
interpretation data 41% - 60% was enough category. It can be concluded the
students’perception on learning English by using E-learning relate to assignment
was good category based on the interpretation data 41% - 60% was enough
category.
67
B. Discussion
This section showed the discussion according to the findings of the
research. There are several things that can be noted down related to the
student’s perception on learning English by using E-learning. E-learning is
the kind of learning process that use electronic as a media. This is included
computer, television, cellphone, laptop, and many others that used network
or not. In this case E-learning that students and teacher use to do learning
and teaching process is the network media. It is caused there is pandemic
in Indonesia ( covid 19). Because of that the government asked to all of
instance of education use E-learning, but it is trigger the differences
perception and opinion from the students related to the using of E-
leaarning on learning English.
According to Omrod in Meirani said distance education has
become an opportunity and concern for many colleges and universities. It
refers to technology-based instructions in which the students are at the
location physically separated from their teacher during the class of
teaching and learning process. Especially, distance education was created
for the students who were unable to attend school. It means E-learning
appropriate in Indonesia situation to keep do teaching and learning process
during pandemic.
To know students’perception on learning English by using E-
learning related to learning purpose. There were three domains. The first
68
was cognitive. Usually, in cognitive domain there were some stages of
thinking. It is kwon Taxonomy Bloom. In taxonomy bloom showed six
stage process of thinking. There were knowledge, comprehension,
application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Thus, in cognitive domain
told about the stage process of thinking.
The second was psychomotor domain. In psychomotor domain
talked about the practice of the learning material. Especially, in learning
English be better if practice the material directly. Hence, psychomotor
domain is one of the aspect of learning purpose.
The last was affective domain. Affective domain related to the
moral value the student. For instance, student needs to be discipline
student. Likes, used uniform, arrive at school on time did not late, respect
to the teacher, and etc. Thus, affective domain was one of the important
domain in learning process.
The next is about assignment. Assignment was one of the important
steps in teaching and learning process. It is caused the assignment was the
tool to measured student understanding. The last was feedback. Feedback
is the important one in teaching and learning process. It caused feedback
can give the stimulus to the student to build students motivation. In
learning process by using E-learning the student need to get the feedback.
To make student know how far their understanding about the material.
Hence, learning purpose, assignment, and feedback was the important
thing in teaching and learning process that should be improved.
69
This research is aimed to answer the research question, to answer
the research question, researcher conducted a descriptive research to
describe the phenomena in numerical data in order to get the detail
information. Then, instrument to collect the data is online questionnaire
with using likert scale. To find the result of research, data are analyzed
with using percentage and mean formula. From the finding of the research,
it shown the student’s perception on learning English by using E-learning
related to learning purpose, assignment, and feedback was 67,62%. Based
on interpretation data 61% - 80% is good category. It means the result of
the data is good category.
70
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
Based on the finding and discussion that presented on the previous
chapter it could be concluded that students at IPA Class Third Grade of MAN
2 Padang Panjang have some perception about using E-learning on learning
English. It was conducted by mean score of each indicator. Students’
perception on learning English by using E-learning relate to learning purpose
was good category with 72,29% , assignment was good category with 70,28%,
and feedback was enough category with 60,3%.
B. Suggestion
Based on the finding of the research about students’perception on
learning English by using E-learning that was conducted at MAN 2
Padang Panjang. The researcher would like to give the suggestion. In
teaching and learning process need to consider the way, procedure, and
media because it is influence the leaning outcomes. Also consider about
the assignment and always give the feedback during teaching and learning
process. Hence, as the teacher also need to know the learning purpose,
consider when give the assignment, and give the feedback during learning
process. it can be build student motivation, understanding and developing
their knowledge.
71
REFERENCES
Adityo Susilo, et al. Coronavirus Deseases 2019: Riview of CurrentLitelature. (Jurnal penyakit dalam Indonesia. Vol.7, No. 1, Maret 2020)
Almarabeh, Tamara. Students’Perception of E-learning at The Universityof Jordan. (iJET, Vol.9, Issue.3, 2014
Ana Fita , Jose F. Monserrat , Germán Moltó , Eva M. Mestre , AdriánRodriguez-Burruezo. Use of Synchronous e-Learning at University Degrees.Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Arifmiboy, Khairuddin. Persepsi Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan BahasaInggris IAIN Bukittinggi Terhadap Penerapan Model Pmbelajaran Micro TechingBerbasis ICT. IAIN Bukittinggi. 2017.
Arifmiboy. Pedoman Tdaluring Microteaching Learning Model(TMLM).Bukittinggi. 2017.
Bimo Walgito. Pengantar Psikologi Umum.C.V Andi Offset. Yogyakarta,Desember 2005.
By Karen Hyder, Ann Kwinn, Ron Miazga, and Matthew Murray.Handbook on Synchronous e-Learning. The eLearning Guild’s. 375 E Street,Suite200 Santa Rosa,CA 95404, 2007.
Claire Loh David H Wong Ali Quazi Russel Philip Kingshot. Re-Examining Students’Perception of E-learning: an Australian Perspective.International Journal of Educational Management. Vol.30 ISS.1
Devajit Mahanta, Majidul Ahmed. E-Learning Objectives, Methodologies,Tools and its Limitatio. International Journal of Innovative Technology andExploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-2, Issue-1, December2012.
D. Papachristos , N. Alafodimos , K. Arvanitis , K. Vassilakis , M.Kalogiannakis , P. Kikilias , E. Zafeiri. An Educational Model for AsynchronousE-Learning. A case study in Higher Technology Education
Handbill of Ministry of Home Affairs. No.440/2436/SJ. Jakarta, 17 March2020.
Hsu Kuan (Jonathan) Liu. Correlation Research on the Application of E-
72
Learning to -Regulated Learning Ability, MotivationalBeliefs, and AcademicPerformance . Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,2016, 12(4), 1091-1100.
I’Anatut Thoifah. Statistika Pendidikan dan Metode Penelitian
Kuantitatif .Madani. Malang.2015.
Iin Nurbudiyani. Pelaksanaan Pengukuran Ranah Kognitif, Afektif, danPsikomotor Pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Kelas III SD Muhamadiyah Palangkara.Anterior Jurnal. Vol.13 (1). Desember 2013.
Ionela-Catalina Tudorache, Ana-Maria Mihaela Iordache, Mihai-TiberiuIordache. The Advantages and The Disadvantages of E-learning in EuropeanUnion. JISOM. 2006.
John Mark Froiland. Intrinsic Motivation, Learning Goals,Engangement,and Achievement in Adiverse High School. Psychology in theSchools,Vol.53(3),2016
Kasenda, Amalia, and Ardaniah. Students’Errors and Teachers’OralCorrective Feedback in Teaching Speaking Skills at SDN Wonorejo 274Surabaya. Mozaik Humaniora, Vol.19 (1),109.123. 2019
L.R. Gay, Geoffrey. E Mills, and Peter. W. Airasian, Educational Research(Competences for Analysis and Aplication Tenth Edition) Pearson Education.
M. Atwi Suparman and Aminudin Zuhairi. Pendidikan Jarak Jauh (Teoridan Praktek). Pusat penerbitan universitas terbuka departemen pendidikannasional. March 2004.
Maria at all. Usefulness of feedback in e-learning from the students’perspective. Intangiable Capital. IC,2015 –11(4): 627-645 –Online ISSN: 1697-9818 –Print ISSN: 2014-3214.
Meirani, Harsasi. The Use of Open Educational Resources in OnlineLearning: A Study of Students’Perception. Turkish Online Journal of DistanceEducation-TOJDE July 2015 ISSN 1302-6488 Volume: 16 Number: 3 Article 6
Ogbonna , Ibezim, and Obi. Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learningin teaching word processing: An experimental approach. South African Journal ofEducation, Volume 39, Number 2, May 2019.
Pei-ChenSun , Ray J. Tsai , Glenn Finger , Yueh-Yang Chen ,DowmingYeh. What drives a successful e-Learning?An empirical investigation ofthe critical factors influencing learner satisfaction.Elsevier. Received 16 August2006; received in revised form 20 November 2006; accepted 22 November 2006.
73
Rahmat, Jalaludin. Paikologi Komunikasi, Edisi Revisi. PT RemajaRosdakarya. Bandung, 2005.
Rozaini Nasution, Teknik Sampling. USU Digital Library, 2003.
Siska Prawati. Penerapan Metode Pemberian Tugas Untuk MeningkatkanHasil Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPS. Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako Online.Vol.4, No.1.
Sudarsono, Gaguk Mrgono, and Wardani Rahayu. PengembanganIntrumen Penelitian Pendidikan. (Y ogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2013)
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif ,
Kualitatif , dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, Maret, 2016.
Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pedekatan Praktek.
Suci Erningsih. Kefektifan Pengggunaan Metode Pemberian Tugas danRetirasi dengan Model Pembelajaran Investigasi Kelompok UntukMeningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Sejarah. Universitas Negri Semarang. 2019.
Syofian Siregar. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif . (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada
Media Group.
Sutryah. Pengaruh Metode Pemberian Tugas dengan Bimbingan GuruTerhadap Kompetensi Menjahit Blazer. Yogya karta 2012
Wowo Sunaryo Kuswana. Taksonomi Berfikir. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.Bandung,2011.
APPENDIXES
74
RESEARCH GUIDELINE
Variable Sub Variable Indicators Descriptors
Students’perception
in English
Learning English
by using E-
learning
1. Learning
purpose
2. Assignment
3. feedback
a. Cognitive
b. Affective
c. Psychomotor
a. The clarity
b. Student level
cognitive
c. Consider to
students differences
d. Skill to distribute
the assignment
a. the way give the
feedback
b. Verbal, non verbal
and variety
3.
T
h
e
f
e
e
c
75
INSTRUMENT GUIDELINE
Variable Sub
Variable
Indicator Descriptor Number Sum
of
Item
Students’
perception
in
learning
English
Learning
English
by using
E-
learning
1.Learning
Purpose
a. Cognitive
b. Affective
c.
Psychomotor
1, 3, 20, 4
2, 16, 17, 18,
5, 19,
10
2.Assignmen
t
a. The clarity
b. Student
level
cognitive
c. Consider to
students
differences
d. Skill to
distribute the
assignment
8, 24
9, 22, 25, 23
7, 21
6, 10
10
3. Feedback a. the way
give the
feedback
b. Verbal, non
verbal and
variety
11, 13, 14, 27,
30
12, 15, 26, 28,
29
10
ANGKET
76
Nama :
Kelas :
A. Pengantar
Assalamualaikum wr wb. Angket ini berguna untuk mengetahuibagaimana persepsi siswa dalam belajar bahasa Inggris secara onlinedengan menggunakan E-learning selama pandemic covid-19. E-learningadalah pembeljaran yang menggunakan media elektronik seperti TV,komputer, dan Handphone dengan Aplikasi-aplikasi yang di gunakanuntuk PBM seperti: Google Classroom, WA, Youtube, Google Form danlain-lain. Agar penelitian ini bisa memberikan manfaat yang optimal,peneliti berharap saudara mengisi dan menjawab sesuai dengan keadaanyang sebenarnya. Terima kasih atas bantuan, waktu, dan kesediaannya.
B. Petunjuk
1. Mulailah dengan membaca Basmallah.
2. Bacalah pernyataan pada angket kemudian pilihlah salah satu item
yang telah tersedia dengan memberikan tanda checklist (√) sesuai
dengan keadaan yang sebenarnya.
3. Keterangan item :
Skala Linkert Code Score
Selalu SL 5
Sering SR 4
Jarang JR 3
Kadang-kadang KD 2
Tidak pernah TP 1
77
C. Contoh Pengisian Kuisioner
N
O
Pernyataan SL SR JR KD TP
1. Saya memeperoleh penjelasan materi
yang jelas selama menggunakan E-
learning.
√
Setelah memilih salah satu opsi yang di berikan seperti contoh makasaudara bisa lanjut ke pernyataan selanjutnya.
78
ANGKET
No Pernyataan SL SR JR KD TP
1 Saya belajar bahasa Inggris menggunakan E-
learning Selama pandemic
2 Saya memperoleh materi pemebelajaran bahasa
Inggris selama belajar menggunakan E-learning
3 Siswa memperoleh materi pembelajaran bahasa
Inggris yang banyak selama menggunakan E-
learning
4 Saya menjadi aktif saat belajar bahasa Inggris
selama menggunakan E-learning
5 Saya mempraktekan materi pembelajaran bahasa
Inggris yang butuh dipraktekan dengan baik
selama menggunakan E-learning
6 Saya mengerjakan tugas bahasa Inggris yang
banyak selama menggunakan E-learning
7 Saya memahami tugas bahasa yang diberikan
selama menggunakan E-learning
8 Saya mngerjakan tugas bahasa Inggris dengan
instruksi yang jelas selama menggunakan E-
learning
9 Saya kesulitan memahami tugas bahasa Inggris
79
yang diberikan selama menggunakan E-learning
10 Saya memiliki sedikit waktu untuk mengerjkan
tugas Bahasa Inggris selama menggunakan E-
learning
11 Saya memperoleh umpan balik/ respon di setiap
tugas bahasa Inggris selama menggunakan E-
learning
12 Saya membangun kemampuan bahasa Inggris
karna umpan balik/respon yang membangun
selama belajar menggunakan E-learning.
13 Saya memperoleh umpan balik/ respon dalam
bentuk nilai selama menggunakan E-learning.
14 Saya memperoleh umpan balik/respon dalam
bentuk kalimat tertulis selama menggunakan E-
learning.
15 Saya memberikan tugas-tugas dan memperoleh
umpan balik/respon di setiap tugas selama
menggunakan E-learning.
16 Saya tidak mengerti materi pembelajaran selama
menggunakan E-learning.
17 Saya tidak mengikuti pembelajaran dengan
maksimal selama menggunakan E-learning.
18 Saya tidak dapat mengejar ketertinggalan materi
80
pelajaran saya selama memnggunakan E-learning.
19 Saya tidak memperoleh penjelasan materi bahasa
Inggris dengan jelas selama menggunakan E-
learning.
20 Saya tidak menghadiri proses pembelajaran tepat
waktu selama belajar menggunakan E-learning.
21 Saya tidak mengerjakan tugas bahsa Inggris
dengan cepat selama menggunakan E-learning.
22 Saya tidak memperoleh tugas yang sesuai dengan
materi yang diberikan saat proses pembelajaran
menggunakan E-learning.
23 Saya mengumpulkan tugas tepat waktu selama
menggunakan E-learning .
24 Saya mem peroleh tugas sesuai dengan jadwal
pelajaran selama menggunakan E-learning.
25 Saya memahami tugas yang diberikan selama
menggunakan E-learning.
26 Saya tidak mendapatkan umpan balik/ respon yang
tanggap selama menggunakan E-learning.
27 Saya tidak mendapatkan umpan balik/respon yang
bermakna selama menggunakan E-learning.
28 Saya tidak memperoleh umpan balik/respon yang
langsung selama pembeljaran menggunakan E-
81
learning.
29 Saya tidak mendapatakan umpan balik/respon
selama proses pembelajran bahasa Inggris dengan
menggunakan E-learning.
30 Saya tidak memperoleh umpan balik/ respon yang
membangun pemahaman selama belajar
menggunakan E-learning.
90
APPENDIX
LEARNING PURPOSE
NO p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10TOTALP
1 5 5 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 3.9
2 3 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2.3
3 3 4 2 3 2 5 4 3 3 5 3.4
4 5 5 4 3 3 2 4 4 5 5 4
5 5 5 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 5 4.5
6 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2.8
7 4 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 3.7
8 4 3 4 3 2 3 4 3 4 4 3.4
9 5 4 4 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 3.1
10 5 4 4 2 2 4 5 5 2 5 3.8
11 5 4 3 2 2 5 2 4 2 3 3.2
12 5 5 5 4 3 2 5 5 3 5 4.2
13 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 5 5 3 4
14 3 4 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 2.2
15 5 4 5 3 5 2 2 2 4 2 3.4
16 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3.5
17 4 3 4 4 4 2 3 4 2 3 3.3
18 4 5 5 5 2 4 4 5 2 4 4
19 3 5 3 2 2 4 4 3 2 4 3.2
20 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 4 3.2
21 5 5 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 4 3.4
22 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 5 4 5 3.8
23 5 5 5 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 4.3
24 5 5 5 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 3.9
25 5 5 4 3 3 3 2 3 2 4 3.4
26 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 2 4 3.5
27 5 5 5 5 3 2 5 4 4 5 4.3
28 5 4 4 3 2 2 5 3 4 3 3.5
ASSIGNMENT
91
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10TOTALQ
5 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 3 4.1
3 3 3 5 3 2 2 3 2 2 2.8
3 4 4 5 2 3 2 3 3 2 3.1
5 3 5 3 4 3 4 5 4 4 4
5 4 5 3 2 5 5 5 5 4 4.3
4 4 4 2 4 3 3 3 4 4 3.5
5 4 4 2 4 4 5 1 4 3 3.6
5 4 4 3 3 4 3 2 4 3 3.5
4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 2 3.4
4 1 3 4 1 3 5 5 5 2 3.3
4 2 3 4 3 3 5 3 2 2 3.1
5 3 4 3 3 3 5 3 4 3 3.6
5 4 5 3 2 3 4 4 4 5 3.9
3 3 3 3 4 1 3 2 5 1 2.8
2 3 2 2 5 3 5 3 4 2 3.1
3 4 4 3 3 3 5 2 5 4 3.6
5 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 3.5
5 3 3 4 3 4 5 4 3 2 3.6
4 3 2 5 1 3 2 1 5 2 2.8
4 3 4 3 2 4 5 4 5 3 3.7
5 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 3 3.9
3 4 4 2 2 5 4 4 4 4 3.6
5 3 4 4 2 2 5 4 3 3 3.5
5 3 3 3 4 3 5 4 5 3 3.8
5 3 4 5 5 4 4 1 4 4 3.9
5 3 3 4 3 5 5 4 3 3 3.8
5 5 5 2 3 5 5 5 4 4 4.3
4 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 4 3 3.6
92
FEEDBACK
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 TOTAL R
3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 3.3
2 2 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 2
1 2 2 2 4 3 3 4 3 4 2.8
3 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 3.9
5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4.5
3 2 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3.2
2 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2.3
3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3.6
2 3 3 2 4 2 3 1 3 3 2.6
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 2 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3.2
2 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 2.2
4 4 4 2 4 3 3 3 3 4 3.4
3 3 3 2 3 1 3 2 4 3 2.7
2 3 4 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 2.7
2 3 3 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 2.4
3 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2.7
3 3 5 2 3 4 3 2 2 1 2.8
2 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2.9
3 3 3 3 4 3 4 2 3 3 3.1
4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4.1
3 4 1 1 5 2 1 3 3 3 2.6
2 3 2 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 3.7
3 3 3 4 5 4 3 3 3 3 3.4
4 3 3 3 4 3 2 2 2 3 2.9
4 4 5 3 5 4 4 4 5 5 4.3
4 2 4 2 5 5 4 4 5 4 3.9
Frequencies
93
Notes
Output Created 19-JAN-2021 11:29:12
Comments
Input
Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 28
Missing Value Handling
Definition of MissingUser-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases UsedStatistics are based on all cases
with valid data.
Syntax
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=P1
P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 Q1
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10
/HISTOGRAM
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
ResourcesProcessor Time 00:00:11.15
Elapsed Time 00:00:26.33
P2
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
JR 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
KD 4 14.3 14.3 17.9
SR 12 42.9 42.9 60.7
SL 11 39.3 39.3 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
P3
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
ValidJR 3 10.7 10.7 10.7
KD 6 21.4 21.4 32.1
94
SR 12 42.9 42.9 75.0
SL 7 25.0 25.0 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
P4
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
JR 4 14.3 14.3 14.3
KD 12 42.9 42.9 57.1
SR 9 32.1 32.1 89.3
SL 3 10.7 10.7 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
P5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
JR 9 32.1 32.1 32.1
KD 13 46.4 46.4 78.6
SR 5 17.9 17.9 96.4
SL 1 3.6 3.6 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
P6
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
JR 9 32.1 32.1 32.1
KD 11 39.3 39.3 71.4
SR 6 21.4 21.4 92.9
SL 2 7.1 7.1 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
P7
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
JR 6 21.4 21.4 25.0
KD 5 17.9 17.9 42.9
SR 11 39.3 39.3 82.1
95
SL 5 17.9 17.9 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
P8
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
JR 4 14.3 14.3 17.9
KD 9 32.1 32.1 50.0
SR 8 28.6 28.6 78.6
SL 6 21.4 21.4 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
P9
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
JR 10 35.7 35.7 39.3
KD 5 17.9 17.9 57.1
SR 10 35.7 35.7 92.9
SL 2 7.1 7.1 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
P10
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
JR 2 7.1 7.1 10.7
KD 7 25.0 25.0 35.7
SR 11 39.3 39.3 75.0
SL 7 25.0 25.0 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q1
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
ValidJR 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
KD 5 17.9 17.9 21.4
96
SR 7 25.0 25.0 46.4
SL 15 53.6 53.6 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q2
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
JR 1 3.6 3.6 7.1
KD 15 53.6 53.6 60.7
SR 10 35.7 35.7 96.4
SL 1 3.6 3.6 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q3
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
JR 2 7.1 7.1 7.1
KD 9 32.1 32.1 39.3
SR 13 46.4 46.4 85.7
SL 4 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q4
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
JR 5 17.9 17.9 17.9
KD 10 35.7 35.7 53.6
SR 9 32.1 32.1 85.7
SL 4 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 2 7.1 7.1 7.1
JR 7 25.0 25.0 32.1
KD 10 35.7 35.7 67.9
97
SR 6 21.4 21.4 89.3
SL 3 10.7 10.7 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q6
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
JR 2 7.1 7.1 10.7
KD 14 50.0 50.0 60.7
SR 7 25.0 25.0 85.7
SL 4 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q7
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
JR 3 10.7 10.7 10.7
KD 4 14.3 14.3 25.0
SR 8 28.6 28.6 53.6
SL 13 46.4 46.4 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q8
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 3 10.7 10.7 10.7
JR 3 10.7 10.7 21.4
KD 8 28.6 28.6 50.0
SR 10 35.7 35.7 85.7
SL 4 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q9
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
ValidJR 2 7.1 7.1 7.1
KD 4 14.3 14.3 21.4
98
SR 13 46.4 46.4 67.9
SL 9 32.1 32.1 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
Q10
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
JR 8 28.6 28.6 32.1
KD 10 35.7 35.7 67.9
SR 8 28.6 28.6 96.4
SL 1 3.6 3.6 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R1
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 2 7.1 7.1 7.1
JR 8 28.6 28.6 35.7
KD 12 42.9 42.9 78.6
SR 5 17.9 17.9 96.4
SL 1 3.6 3.6 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R2
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
JR 6 21.4 21.4 25.0
KD 15 53.6 53.6 78.6
SR 5 17.9 17.9 96.4
SL 1 3.6 3.6 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R3
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid TP 4 14.3 14.3 14.3
99
JR 2 7.1 7.1 21.4
KD 10 35.7 35.7 57.1
SR 8 28.6 28.6 85.7
SL 4 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R4
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 5 17.9 17.9 17.9
JR 8 28.6 28.6 46.4
KD 11 39.3 39.3 85.7
SR 2 7.1 7.1 92.9
SL 2 7.1 7.1 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 3 10.7 10.7 10.7
JR 2 7.1 7.1 17.9
KD 8 28.6 28.6 46.4
SR 7 25.0 25.0 71.4
SL 8 28.6 28.6 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R6
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 2 7.1 7.1 7.1
JR 6 21.4 21.4 28.6
KD 9 32.1 32.1 60.7
SR 10 35.7 35.7 96.4
SL 1 3.6 3.6 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R7
100
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 2 7.1 7.1 7.1
JR 3 10.7 10.7 17.9
KD 14 50.0 50.0 67.9
SR 9 32.1 32.1 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R8
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 2 7.1 7.1 7.1
JR 9 32.1 32.1 39.3
KD 8 28.6 28.6 67.9
SR 9 32.1 32.1 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R9
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 1 3.6 3.6 3.6
JR 4 14.3 14.3 17.9
KD 14 50.0 50.0 67.9
SR 7 25.0 25.0 92.9
SL 2 7.1 7.1 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
R10
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
TP 2 7.1 7.1 7.1
JR 3 10.7 10.7 17.9
KD 13 46.4 46.4 64.3
SR 9 32.1 32.1 96.4
SL 1 3.6 3.6 100.0
Total 28 100.0 100.0
101
Table The Frequences and Percentage of Students’Perception on Learning
English by Using E-Learning Related to Learning Purpose
No
Item
Always Often Sometime Seldom Never
N % N % N % N % N %
1 23 82,1% 4 14,3
%
1 3,6% - 0% - 0%
211
39,3% 12 42,9
%
4 14,3% 4 14,3
%
- 0%
37
25,0% 12 42,9
%
6 21,4% 3 10,7
%
- 0%
43
10,7% 9 32,1
%
12 42,9% 4 14,3
%
- 0%
51
3,6% 5 17,9
%
13 46,4% 9 32,1
%
- 0%
6 2 7.1% 6 21,4
%
11 39,3% 9 32,1
%
- 0%
7 5 17,9% 11 39,3
%
5 17,9% 6 21,4
%
1 3,6
%
8 6 21,4% 8 28,6
%
9 32,1% 4 14,3
%
1 3,6
%
102
9 2 7.1% 10 35,7
%
5 17,9% 10 35,7
%
1 3,6
%
10 7 25,0% 11 39,3
%
7 25,0% 2 7.1% 1 3,6
%
MEA
N
239,2% : 10 =
23,92%
314,4% : 10
= 31,44%
260,8 : 10 =
26,08%
182% : 10
= 18,2%
14.4% :
10=
1,44%
Table The Total Frequences and Percentage of Students’Perception on
Learning English by Using E-Learning Related to Learning Purpose
NO Always Often Sometime Seldom Never Total
Score
Percentage Interpretasi
N N N N N
1 23 4 1 0 0 134 95,7% Very Good
2 11 12 4 4 0 123 87,9% Very Good
3 7 12 6 3 0 107 76,4% Good
4 3 9 12 4 0 95 67,9% Good
5 1 5 13 9 0 82 58,6% Enough
6 2 6 11 9 0 85 60,7% Good
7 5 11 5 6 1 97 69,3% Good
8 6 8 9 4 1 98 70% Good
9 2 10 5 10 1 86 61,4% Good
103
10 7 11 7 2 1 105 75% Good
MEAN 1,012 722,9% : 10
= 72,29%
Good
Table The Frequences and Percentage of Students’Perception on Learning
English by Using E-Learning Related to Assignment
No
Item
Always Often Sometime Seldom Never
N % N % N % N % N %
1 15 53,6% 7 25,0% 5 17,9% 1 3,6% - 0%
2 1 3,6% 10 35,7% 15 53,6% 1 3,6% 1 3,6%
3 4 14,3% 13 46,4% 9 32,1% 2 7,1% - 0%
4 4 14,3% 9 32,1% 10 35,7% 5 17,9% - 0%
5 3 10,7% 6 21,4% 10 35,7% 7 25,0% 2 7,1%
6 4 14,3% 7 25,0% 14 50,0% 2 7,1% 1 3,6%
7 13 46,4% 8 28,6% 4 14,3% 3 10,7% - 0%
8 4 14,3% 10 35,7% 8 28,6% 3 10,7% 3 10,7%
9 9 32,1% 13 46,4% 4 14,3% 2 7,1% - 0%
10 1 3,6% 8 28,6% 10 35,7% 8 28,6% 1 3,6%
MEAN 207,2% : 10 =
20,72%
324,9% : 10
= 32,49%
317,9% : 10 =
31,79%
121,4% : 10
= 12,14%
28,6% : 10=
2,86%
104
Table The Total Frequencies and Percentage of Students’Perception on
Learning English by Using E-Learning Related to Assignment
NO Always Often Sometime Seldom Never Total
Score
Percentage Interpretasi
N N N N N
1 15 7 5 1 0 120 85,7% Very Good
2 1 10 15 1 1 93 66,4% Good
3 4 13 9 2 0 103 73,6% Good
4 4 9 10 5 0 86 61,4% Good
5 3 6 10 7 2 85 58,6% Enough
6 4 7 14 2 1 95 67,9% Good
7 13 8 4 3 0 115 82,1% Good
8 4 10 8 3 3 93 66,4% Good
9 9 13 4 2 0 113 80,7% Very Good
10 1 8 10 8 1 84 60% Enough
MEAN 987 702,8% : 10
= 70,28%
Good
Table The Frequences and Percentage of Students’Perception on Learning
English by Using E-Learning Related to Feedback
105
No
Item
Always Often Sometime Seldom Never
N % N % N % N % N %
1 1 3,6% 5 17,9% 12 7,1% 8 28,6
%
2 7,1%
21
3,6% 5 17,9% 15 53,6% 6 21,4
%
1 3,6%
34
14,3% 8 28,6% 10 35,7% 2 7,1% 4 14,3
%
42
7.1% 2 7.1% 11 39,3% 8 28,6
%
5 17,9
%
58
28,6% 7 25,0% 8 28,6% 2 7,1% 3 10,7
%
6 2 7.1% 6 21,14
%
9 32,1% 10 35,7
%
1 3.6%
7 - 0% 9 32,1% 14 50,0% 3 10,7
%
2 7,1%
8 - 0% 9 32,1% 8 28,6% 9 32,1
%
2 7,1%
9 2 7.1% 7 25,0% 14 50,0% 4 14,3
%
1 3,6%
10 1 3,6% 9 32,1% 13 46,4% 3 10,7
%
2 7,1%
106
MEA
N
75% : 10 =
7,5%
206,84% :
10 = 20,68%
371,4 : 10 =
37,14%
196,3 : 10
= 19,63%
82,1% :
10= 8,21%
Table The Total Frequencies and Percentage of Students’Perception on
Learning English by Using E-Learning Related to Feedback
NO Always Often Sometime Seldom Never Total
Score
Percentage Interpretasi
N N N N N
1 1 5 12 8 2 79 56,4% Enough
2 1 5 15 6 1 83 59,3% Enough
3 4 8 10 2 4 87 62,1% Good
4 2 2 11 8 5 72 51,4% Enough
5 8 7 8 2 3 99 70,7% Good
6 2 6 9 10 1 82 58,6% Enough
7 0 9 14 3 2 86 61,4% Good
8 0 9 8 9 2 80 57,1% Enough
9 2 7 14 4 1 88 62,9% Good
10 1 9 13 3 2 88 62,9% Good
MEAN 987 602,8% : 10
= 60,3%
Enough