Is the Function of Yewden Villa Apparent Through the Investigation of the Possible Practice of...
Transcript of Is the Function of Yewden Villa Apparent Through the Investigation of the Possible Practice of...
Independent Study
Figure 1: Excavation area of the first house from the first excavation byAlfred Cocks in 1912.
Chiltern archaeology
Brothel or Temple:
Is the Function of Yewden Villa Apparent Through theInvestigation of the Possible Practice of Infanticide at the
Site?
1
Contents
1. Introduction
1.1. Research Aims
1.2. Previous investigations
2. Archaeological Background
2.1. The First Excavation
2.1.1. First House
2.1.2. Second House
2.1.3. Third House
2.1.4. The Fourth ‘House’
2.3. The Villa at Mill End
3. Infant Bones
3.1. Scientific Analysis
3.2. The Practice of Infanticide in the Roman Empire
4. Children in the Roman Empire
4.1. Childbirth
4.2. Gods and Goddesses of Childbirth
4.2.1. The possibility of a Temple at the site ofYewden Villa
4.3. Infant Mortality2
4.4. Infant Commemoration and Burial
5. Conclusion
1. Introduction
The topic of this study focuses on the Roman site of Yewden
Villa, located in Hambleden, Buckinghamshire (Figure 1). The
site was first excavated by Alfred Cocks in 1912, upon which
he excavated the
majority of the
site, uncovering
several interesting
archaeological features. These features consisted of several
roman houses,
ranging in size and function, along with the revelation of
outbuildings, main buildings, surrounding walls, trackways and
large, varying collections of artefacts (Eyers, G. 2008, pp.
5). The most intriguing discovery made on this site was the
abundance of human remains that were buried there. At first
glance the occurrence of numerous human remains seems
3
Figure 2: Satellite image of Hambleden, Buckinghamshire, and its relationto the river Thames near Mill End. Google
relatively indifferent, taking into consideration the
occupational span of the site stretches from the middle of the
1st century up until the end of the 4th century (Cocks, A. 1921,
pp. 141). However, at closer inspection 97 out of over 100
remains found at the site, were later analysed revealing that
they were in fact, infant remains.
1.1. Research aims
The fact that this excavation uncovered so many human remains
is enough to raise interest about the site itself. Taking into
consideration that the majority of these remains belonged to
infants, the deliberation of why and how these bones came to
be there in the first place raises questions about the
function of the site and the reasoning behind why so many
infant bones were found here. Using archaeological evidence
and scientific analysis from Yewden Villa and surrounding
areas, this study will determine whether the site was home to
a fully operational brothel or was the site of a religious
temple, and whether this evidence supports the claims that
infanticide was practiced during the occupation of the site.
1.2 Previous Investigations
4
The excavations at Yewden Villa have already generated
attention among many archaeologists, including Dr. Gill Eyers
who investigated the site in 2008, publishing a report on the
geophysics of the site (Eyers, G. 2008). This report aimed to
evaluate and uncover more about the Romano British activity at
the site (Eyers, G. 2008, pp. 5). Upon discovering more about
the site it was confirmed that two Romano British villas were
recorded at close proximity, approximately 670m apart, in the
Hambleden Valley; Yewden Villa and Mill End.
Dr. Eyers also published a report With Simon Mays, analysing
the infant remains at the site (Mays, S. and Eyers, G. 2011).
In these reports the focus mainly centres on the infant bones
themselves and the possible evidence that suggests the
practice of infanticide at the site. The paper shows that the
Romano British perinates showed a strong peak in their age
distribution at around 38-40 weeks. This age generally
corresponds to that of a full term infant (Mays, S. and Eyers,
G. 2011, pp. 1932). The infant bones found at Hambleden
yielded the most perinatal burials from any Roman site in
Britain. The sheer number of bones found, caused the excavator
of the site to come to the conclusion that it suggested
5
infanticide due to the surreptitious disposals of the bodies
(Mays, S. and Eyers, G. 2011, pp. 1932). Other people who have
looked at the reports have also repeated this interpretation
of the suggested practice of infanticide, and specifically
added the notion that the infants may have been the unwanted
offspring of slaves working at the villa (Mays, S. and Eyers,
G. 2011, pp. 1933). These papers also allowed Dr. Eyers to
conclude that the high number of infant mortality resulted as
a consequence of a brothel operating at the site.
2. Archaeological Background
As previously stated, the site was excavated in 1912 by Alfred
Cocks. The majority of the site was excavated during this
time, revealing several archaeological features. Although the
site has not been re-excavated, there have been several
investigations into the geophysics of the site, and analysis
of the infant bones.
2.1. The First Excavation
The first excavations were carried out in 1921. During these
excavations, Alfred Cocks discovered a site with a rich
6
archaeological and historical background. The artefacts found
during these excavations range from the Palaeolithic right
through to Medieval times (Eyers, G. 2008, pp. 5). During the
excavations it was confirmed that the homestead was built
before the middle of the 1st century AD and occupied until the
end of the 4th century. The latest coins belonging to the site
dated to around 392-5 AD (Cocks, A. 1921, pp. 141).
2.1.2. The First House
The first house, also known as the principle dwelling house
measured around 96ft by 82ft (Figure 1). The excavator and
author of the excavation report, Alfred Cocks, describes the
house to be shaped like a block letter ‘E’ with the bottom of
the shape turning north and the open right side facing the
west (Cocks, A. 1921, pp. 144). The longest portion of the
‘letter’ is formed by long parallel, tessellated corridors
(Figure 4) between which are four rooms. Cocks (1921), writes
about how the four rooms have important alterations deviating
from
7
8
Figure 3: Excavated area of the main buildingshowing an extending bathroom. Original bathroom on the right, the extended portion
Figure 4: An excavated tessellated floor found in the first house. Chiltern archaeology
original plan,
probably the
result of additions made in the middle of the 3rd century. Two
of the four rooms appear to be bathrooms (Figure 3).
2.1.2. The Second House
The second house was discovered on the inner side of the South
Enclosure wall. The excavation report describes it as
resembling a large workshop or barn, most likely dating back
to the late 1st century (Cocks, A. 1921, pp. 148). Cocks, also
writes how the west of the building was probably converted
into a cottage in the early 4th century. The second house
uncovered a large coin hoard. Over 294 coins were found hidden
inside a small dark pot, placed on its side. This suggests
that the villa may have been used as a trading point for near-
by towns and villages, with relatively good business from
these towns.
2.1.3. The Third House
9
Figure 5: Excavated well and grid iron furnace, possibly used for corn drying. Chiltern archaeology
The third house is probably the most interesting,
archaeologically. Outside the house was a flint floor
measuring around 12ft square and a small shed, bellow which
was a gravel floor (figure 6). Two gravel paths were also
revealed, one positioned running behind the outer wall of the
house, diverting to what appears to be a faint 7m by 4m
structure (Eyers, G. 2008, pp. 26). The second of the gravel
pathways leaves the edge of the annexe to the 3rd House which
is joined by a side shoot from another house. This path
continues North-West, taking it directly to a small building
in the adjacent field recorded on the HER as a temple, this
feature has not however been surveyed. The gravel floor found
beneath the house was uncovered and further investigation took
place. Upon which, a large pit was discovered mostly filled
with heavy building materials, masses of large flint and many
roofing tiles along with others. Another 14ft below this
investigation of the pit, just below the water level at that
time, revealed the skeletons of three adult persons and two
children, all of which were found together (Cocks, A. 1921,
pp. 149). The bones found had to be felt for under the water,
therefore little could be said about the positions of the
10
individuals other than the fact they were more or less intact
(Cocks, A. 1921, pp. 149). The artefacts placed with the
bodies give a good impression of the age of the bodies. The
pottery found in association with the individuals dated
roughly to around the second or first or second half of the 3rd
century, probably no earlier than 250 AD.
2.1.4. The Fourth ‘House’
The fourth ‘house’ excavated by Cocks, is the smallest house
found during the excavations, measuring at approximately 6.7m
x 4.6m (figure 7). The outer wall was built with flint and
mortar, with the inner wall built using flint and mud. The
house is situated in a central courtyard placed in between the
1st and 3rd houses (Eyers, G. 2008, pp. 43). Due to its small
size and placement in relation to the villa, it can be
interpreted as a shrine. This is also supported by the fact
that it only holds one room which is an unusual architectural
feature in roman homesteads (Rivet, A. L. F. 1969, pp. 52).
Supportive evidence of the apparent shrine is noticed in the
form of a miniature votive statue found by a metal detectorist
around 200m north of the location of the building. The
11
possibility of a temple and the importance of the votive
offering will be discussed in later sections.
2.2. The Villa at Mill End
Mill End was the second Romano-British villa found in
association with the villa complex at Hambleden (figure 8).
The villa was first recorded in July 1921 by E. Payton,
alongside the excavations at Yewden Villa. The villa at Mill
End has not previously been excavated; the field is usually
under pasture making excavation limited, it is now a scheduled
ancient monument (Farley, M. E. 1983, pp. 256). The presence
of two villas in the Hambleden Valley is of some interest.
Generally there is a rough space of around 1 and a half to 2
miles between them (Branigan, K. 1968, pp. 152). It was
considered that this may be due to estate size. The fact that
two villas existed in such close proximity to one another
makes it unlikely that they were operating for the same
reasons. This interpretation does not correlate unless the
dates of occupation of both villas coincided with each other
(Farley, M. E. 1983, pp. 258). However, the likelihood of
these two villas running together is highly plausable as both
seem to be in use from the 1st to the 4th centuries. The
12
location of the Mill End villa in comparison to Yewden villa
also arouses interest. The close proximity of Mill End to the
River Thames makes it the better situated of the two. It is
possible that the Mill End Villa was a secondary development
made for the exploitation of sources from the river (Farley,
M. E. 1983, pp. 258). In terms of the artefacts gained,
certain aspects of the finds indicate that Hambleden may have
been a farming unit where production was the result of
government requirements (Applebaum, C. 1966). The high number
of styli found at Hambleden, as well as the numerous corn
dryers, evidence of pig fattening and cattle breeding are
particularly indicative of farming, it could be the case that
there was a bureaucratic checking of produce, giving use to
the number of styli associated with the site (Farley, M. E.
1985, pp. 258).
13
Figure 6: excavated area of the 3rd houses showing
14
Figure 6: excavated area of the 3rd houses showing
Figure 7: excavated image of the fourth 'house' facing north east, showing the single room. Chiltern archaeology report 117
Figure 8: The layout of the villa at Mill End. Chiltern archaeology report 117
3. Infant Bones
The most remarkable feature of the excavation is the number of
infant bones found ‘littering’ the site on the Northern side
(Cocks, A. 1921, pp. 150). Most of them appeared to be new
born with the occasional being slightly older. A few of the
bodies were laid out at full length, where as some were
evidently carried and buried wrapped in a cloth or burial
garment huddled, and bundled up with the head being central,
the knees above it. There was no evidence found to suggest
that the graves of the infants were marked, in some cases a
second body was placed in an already occupied grave. After
dark burials of children and infants were not uncommon in the
Roman world but rather widely practiced as a burial rite. With
this in mind it would not be surprising that newly deceased
infants were placed in occupied graves due to the ceremony
being held at night time (Hope, V. 2007).
3.1. Scientific Analysis
15
Scientific analysis of the Hambleden burials was carried out
upon their discovery in 1912. The results were presented in
the report written by Cocks. Sir, Arthur Keith, found that the
bones of the adult skeleton displayed no marks of violence. In
all three of the adult skeletons the bones had impressions
which were suggestive of muscular strength. The bones of the
fingers and hand were thick, also suggestive that the
individuals were accustomed to manual labour. With this in
mind it is likely that the individuals were associated with
the complex, presumably as labourers (Keith, A. 1921, pp.
159). No further investigation had been carried out to
ascertain details about the infant bones found at Yewden Villa
until recently. In 2011, Simon Mays and Gill Eyers carried out
detailed analysis of the infant bones. Mays, had already
established that it was possible to infer whether infanticide
was practiced on a regular basis by analysing the age at death
of perinatal burials (Mays, S. 2001, pp. 555). The aim of
their research was to shed light on the idea that infanticide
was practiced at that site. This site was chosen for analysis
for two reasons: the first being that the site shows
occupation during the Roman period, the second reason being
16
that there are multiple sources of evidence that suggest
infanticide was a widely practiced phenomenon in the Roman
Empire (Langer, W. L. 1974, pp. 555).
The infants were mainly found on the North side of the villa
complex (Figure 9). Many of the infant bones cannot be
directly dated; however of the 16 that could be dated more
closely, they dated to approximately 120-200AD, with the
burials accumulating over a period of 280 years (Mays, S. and
Eyers, G. 2011, pp. 1933). After looking more closely at the
infant bones on the site, an observation was made that the
infants involved did not get proper burial treatment but were
rather cast into a sewer that ran beneath a brothel that was
operating there (Mays, S. and Eyers, G. 2011, pp. 1931).
However the only body of water found at Hambleden only yielded
two child burials. Whether or not the water ran beneath a
brothel or not is something that will also be looked into
during this study.
The most common motive for infanticide in the Roman world was
because the child was not of the desired sex, limiting family
size or because the child was deformed. In the case of the
Hambledon infants this seems unlikely. The theory of a brothel
17
operating at the site would arouse the suspicion that the
motivation, if any, for practicing infanticide, was due to the
simple reason of not wanting to bring children into a highly
slave driven environment.
To investigate whether or not infanticide is a likely
interpretation in the case of the Hambleden infants, the long
bone lengths of the infants and their estimated ages at death
are looked at and compared with the site of Ashkelon, a late
Roman, early Byzantine period which both share the same
indication of infanticide at the site (Mays, S. and Eyers, G.
2011, pp. 1933). Infanticide was usually carried out as close
to birth as possible, in order to prevent the mother-infant
bonding. This would allow for the victims to fall between a
narrow age range (Tooley, M. 1983). The investigation into
infanticide and Romano-British perinates found that the
infants showed a strong peak in their age distribution at
about 38-40 weeks. This age corresponds to that of a full term
infant (Mays, S. and Eyers, G. 2011, pp. 1932). The age
distributions being clustered tightly around that of a full
term infant is highly indicative of infanticide. The ages at
death were estimated from long bone lengths. In terms of
18
central tendency and dispersion, the Hambleden infants
strongly resembled the infants found at Ashkelon. The infants
found at Ashkelon also represented a strong chance that the
infants were the victims of infanticide (Mays, S. and Eyers,
G. 2011, pp. 1336). Infant bones found in usual burial
conditions are often very fragile and rarely found intact in
their original context. However at Ashkelon, the skeletons
were in good condition, indicating that their disposal
occurred fairly soon after birth while the soft tissue was
still present (Smith, P. and Kahila, G. 1992, pp. 669).
As well as analysing the long bone lengths, the few prevailing
dental remains were also analysed and compared to the dental
samples found at Ashkelon. Out of the infant bones taken from
Hambleden, only 12 had surviving dental remains. The teeth
from 6 of the perinates were sectioned in order to look for
the neonatal lines – none of which were found, indicating that
the infants were either born dead or died within around 14
days of birth (Whittaker, D. K. and Richard, D. 1978).
The main conclusion reached in the case of the Ashkelon sample
was that the infants were victims of infanticide, due to the
callous nature of their disposal. Another conclusion reached,
19
suggested that the infants were victims of a mass disaster
that somehow cause the breakdown of normal burial practices
(Smith, P. and Kahila, G. 1992, pp. 670), however there is not
enough conclusive evidence, literary or archaeological to
suggest any ‘mass disaster’ taking place during the time
period or over such a large period of time. In the Hambleden
sample, it was found that the infants indicated evidence for
infanticide. It is clear from the studies of the infant bones
that infanticide was practiced in Britain during its time as
part of the Roman Empire. Comparative evidence from the site
of Ashkelon also gives archaeological evidence that suggests
infanticide was practiced in the Eastern part of the Empire
(Mays, S. and Eyers, G. 2011, pp. 1337). However, evidence for
infanticide in other parts of the Roman Empire is not apparent
thus far.
4. Children in the Roman Empire
4.1. Childbirth
Childbirth is a challenging aspect of life for women in any
time. In the Roman period however there were a number of
things that could and often would go wrong during childbirth.
20
The women responsible for the delivery and care of the mother
and child after birth would have to ensure that every aspect
was taken care of; they would often go to extreme lengths to
do so. The training and skill of the midwives varied, many
rural women would combine the act of midwifery with witchcraft
and the use and of herbal medicines (Lindsay, A. J. 1989, pp.
35). In roman medicine the life of the mother was of paramount
importance. In cases of difficulty it was often necessary to
focus the attention on the mother, even if it meant the child
dying as part of this process (Lindsay, A. J. 1989, pp. 36).
4.2. Gods and Goddesses of Childbirth
Juno was the first and foremost goddess that Roman women would
relate to during major events in their lives, including
marriage and childbirth (Lindsay, A. J. 1989, pp. 143). The
goddesses Postverta and Prosa were also called upon by women
who feared childbirth; these specifically were invoked in
order to avert the dangers of a breach birth (Turcan, R. 2000,
pp.
21
22
Figure 9: reconstruction of the Yewden Villa complex showing the distribution of infant remains at the site. Chiltern archaeology
19). Sacrifices
were also made to the
nymph Egeria, who allowed
the woman to give birth without difficulty (Turcan, R. 2000,
pp. 19). Credit must be given first and foremost to Juno in
the form of Lucina who overlooked all areas of life for women.
Offerings were often given to Juno in the form of coins at her
Esquilline temple, when a mother gave birth to a male child
(Turcan, R. 2000, pp. 19). Other offerings were also given to
goddesses during and after childbirth in the form of pipeclay
statuettes. Using evidence from other sites where pipeclay
statuettes were also found in association with infant and
child burials, it may be the case that the statuettes were
used as offerings when children or women had died during
childbirth (Lindsay, A. J. 1989, pp. 143). A number of
pipeclay figurines were found on a site in Kent. Upon
excavation it seemed likely that the figurines had been
deliberately broken before being added to the burial. After
doing so, it was believed that the spirit portrayed by the
23
Figure 10: votive offering showing awoman holding a child, possibly representing a mother goddess, foundin association with the fourth 'house'. Chiltern archaeology
figurines would also die making them available to accompany
the deceased into the afterlife (Lindsay, A. J. 1989, pp.
148). Terracotta figurines were also found at Colchester,
where archaeologists excavating in that area discovered a
child’s grave which yielded figurines made out of terracotta
rather than pipeclay. In this context it was suggested that
these terracotta figurines were also used as offerings in the
religious beliefs of women during the 2nd century (Eckardt, H.
1999, pp. 60).
This seems to be a likely suggestion in the case of the
Hambleden infants. A broken figurine of a woman in a woven
chair nursing a child was found in association with the villa
excavated at Hambleden. The original placement of the broken
figurine is not known. However, using existing knowledge of
pipeclay figurines and their importance during childbirth it
is highly likely that the figurine found at Hambleden was used
in a similar manner. This also suggests that a number of
children may not have been the victims of infanticide, but the
victims of a difficult and fatal birth.
24
4.2.1. The possibility of a Temple at the site of Yewden Villa
As previously discussed throughout this study, the most
common, conclusion reached for the high number of infant
burials found at the site is due to running of a brothel. Dr.
Gill Eyers first suggested this idea that the villa also
operated as a brothel in an article for the BBC. Dr. Eyers
also suggested that infanticide resulted as a means of
disposing unwanted offspring conceived by the women working
within the brothel. A similar idea was also proposed by Frere,
where he suggested that the babies were the illegitimate
offspring of illicit affairs with slaves (Frere, S. 1967).
Other people have however disputed these claims, due to the
fact that the villa was situated too far away from any highly
populated areas.
It is clear to see after further investigation into the site,
how Dr. Eyers came to her conclusions. However, the only link
between brothels and Yewden Villa is the fact that there is
archaeological evidence for multiple bathrooms/wet-rooms in
the villa itself. It is already known from literary sources
that brothels were usually situated next to or near public
bath houses (Lindsay, A. J. 1989, pp. 81). Although this is a
25
very ambiguous link connecting the two, it is a possibility
that the villa had multiple functions. It is viable, that the
villa operated as a communal public entertainment centre, with
both small but various baths/wet-rooms where people would
convene, and rooms where men working in the area would go to
find a female companion.
Again, it is understandable how this conclusion was reached,
but there is another possibility as to what purpose the site
maintained. Yewden Villa yielded many sources of evidence that
suggest the villa had connections with multiple mother
goddesses from different parts of the Roman Empire. Although
there were very few, however, significant religious and votive
objects they may be indicative of a temple or shrine operating
at the site. Votive offerings are the most likely form of
evidence when locating a nearby shrine or temple (Smith, J. B.
1995, pp. 1). The temple would have been used when women would
give birth, acting as a birthing room and a place where the
women could get protection from the goddesses in cases of
difficult or fatal births. The large number of infant bones
found at the site would, in this case, be an example of the
26
high number of fatalities during childbirth or still births
who were then buried at the site where they had died.
In the same BBC article, Dr. Alice Roberts talks about
indentations and marks found on a number of the infant bones,
possibly due to a sharp implement. Dr. Roberts also goes on to
say how the cut marks may be an example of anything from the
human sacrifices of a religious ritual to the more extreme
possibility of the dismemberment of a child during birth, in
order to save the life of the mother. In the case of the
Hambleden infants, it could be the case that these
indentations and marks on the bones resulted as a consequence
of a difficult birth. Where the mother was possibly having
trouble giving birth herself, midwives present may have used
insufficient medical equipment in order to help deliver the
baby. During this time the babies’ bones would have still been
rather fragile, causing any type of force on the bones to
leave a mark.
4.3. Infant Mortality and Infanticide
27
During this time period infant mortality rates were
particularly high for babies and children. Many infants did
not survive childbirth; the weeks after childbirth were
therefore the most critical for infants who had gone through
difficult births (Hope, V. 2007, pp. 10). The main reasons for
such high mortality resulted from unwanted children. For
example, a father could decide to choose whether or not he
brought up a child. The exact motives for this are little
evaluated however it can be assumed factors including poverty,
disability, gender or illegitimacy were taken into
consideration beforehand (Harris, W. V. 1994, pp. 13).
As previously stated there are numerous forms of literary
evidence that suggests infanticide was practiced in the Roman
Empire, with strong reasoning supposing the exposure of
infants was a common practice (Harris, W. 1982, pp. 114). Some
writers have even postulated the importance of such acts as a
form of population control, especially where it was though
that too many children of one sex were being born (Engels, D.
1980). Many academics who have previously written about the
favourability of one sex, suggest that female infants were the
most likely victim of the practice. The exposure of children
28
also served as a form of limiting family size in general,
usually being practiced by women or slaves in order to try and
stop the children being brought into the same labour intensive
world as the parents (Harris, W. 1994, pp. 3).
While in modern times the idea of infanticide is an utterly
abhorrent concept, in the roman world, the practice of
infanticide or exposure of infants was tolerated in cases
where people believed that too many children of the same sex
were being born (Harris, W. V. 1982, pp. 115). When exposure
was the case, rather than the practice of infanticide it was
usually the work of women or slaves (Harris, W. V. 1994, pp.
2). This is supported by the site of Yewden Villa, as there
are multiple sources of evidence which suggest a high majority
of women labourers working at the site (Farley, M. E. 1983,
pp. 259).
4.4. Infant Commemoration and Burial
Due to lack of evidence, it is not possible to ascertain what
proportion of infants received a formal burial. There is
however evidence that suggests infants were buried, not
outside the town, as with regular roman burial customs
29
according to the twelve tables, but were buried in the town
and even in some circumstances under the threshold or
foundations of a house (Wiedemann, T. 1989, pp. 179). The lack
of statistical analysis of epitaphs also indicates the
underrepresentation of infants in commemorative burials,
possibly due to the frequency of their deaths (Valerie, H.
2007, pp. 11).
5. Conclusion
This study has aimed to shed light on the purpose and function
of Yewden Villa, Hambleden. Throughout this study, different
avenues have been explored in order to highlight the evidence
found at Hambleden, which suggest its differing functions
throughout its occupation from the 1st through to the 4th
century AD. The most important archaeological discovery found
at Hambleden was the high number of infant remains found
buried in the area surrounding the villa. This has
subsequently been the primary focus of interest for
archaeologists conducting further research on both the Villa
and the infant remains. This study, however, has taken a
different approach toward conceptualising the importance of
the infant remains, and has sought to interpret available
30
information as a stepping stone in order to formulate a better
understanding of the function of the site.
After researching the site further and incorporating other
interpretations made by archaeologists, such as Dr. Gill
Eyers, and Sheppard Frere, it became clear throughout the
analysis that two main functions have been forwarded. The
first is that Yewden Villa operated as a brothel, and as a
result of the women conceiving whilst working there, they
would consequently turn to the practice of infanticide in
order to prevent the children growing up in such a harsh
environment. The second, more plausible explanation, suggests
that Yewden Villa was an industrial complex dependant on
female workers. Due to the high population of females, there
would have been an increase in births in the area. It would
have therefore been necessary to incorporate some sort of
religious building – a temple, or shrine -where women could go
to give birth and seek the comfort of certain goddesses in
times of difficulty.
From the research assessed in this investigation, the latter
suggestion seems to be a more plausible interpretation. A
variety of different industrial equipment was discovered at
31
the site, along with evidence that suggests the trade and
produce of cattle and other animals. Additionally, the high
number of styli found implies a particularly well educated
area and the perception that bureaucratic checking and
documenting of trade occurred within the area.
In order for a conclusive interpretation for the function of
this site, and whether it does in fact prove that infanticide
was practiced in the Roman world, it would be necessary to
look further into other aspects of the site, especially its
industrial history. The fourth ‘house’ or temple, as this
study would also suggest, has not been fully surveyed at
present. With the fulfilment of the acknowledgement
limitations noted above, in the future it may be possible to
obtain a definitive interpretation of the Yewden Villa as a
primary an important trading centre for the surrounding areas,
rather than a site unusual for its high level of infant
deaths.
32
Bibliography
Applebaum, C. 1966. In: Thomas, C. ed. Rural Settlement in Roman
Britain. CBA Res.
Branigan, K. 1968. Romano-British Rural Settlement in the West
Chilterns. Journal of Archaeology, pp. 124-152.
Cocks, A. 1921. A Romano-British Homestead in the Hambleden
Valley. Archaeologia 74, pp. 141-198.
Eckhardt, H. 1999. The Colchester ‘Childs Grave’. Britannia 30,
pp. 57-90.
Eyers, G. 2008. Romans in the Hambleden Valley Project. Geophysical and
Desktop Study. Report 1. Chiltern Archaeology Report Number 117.
Chiltern Archaeology, High Wycombe.
33
Farley, M. E. 1983. The Villa at Mill End, Hambleden,
Buckinghamshire, and its Neighbour. Britannia 14, pp. 256-259.
Frere, S. 1967. Britannia, a History of Roman Britain. Routledge, & Kegan
Paul, London.
Gowland, R. L. & Chamberlain, A. T. 2002. A Bayesian Approach
to Ageing Perinatal Skeletal Material from Archaeological
Sites: Implications for Evidence for Infanticide in Roman
Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science 29(6), pp. 677-685.
Harris, W. V. 1994. Child Exposure in the Roman Empire. The
Journal of Roman Studies 84, pp. 1-22.
Hope, V. M. 2007. Death in Ancient Rome: A Sourcebook. Routledge.
Langer, W. L. 1974. Infanticide: A Historical Survey. History of
Childhood Quarterly 1, pp. 353-365.
Lindsay, A. J. 1989. Women in Roman Britain. British Museum
Publications. London.
Mays, S. 1993. Infanticide in Roman Britain. Antiquity 84(257),
pp. 883-888.
34
Mays, S. 2000. The Archaeology and History of Infanticide and
its Occurrence in Earlier British Populations. In: Derevenski,
J. S. ed. Children and Material Culture. Routledge, London.
Mays, S. 2001. Sex Identification in Some Putative Infanticide
Victims From Roman Britain Using Ancient DNA. Journal of
Archaeological Science 38(8), pp. 1931-1938.
Mays, S. & Eyers, J. 2011. Perinatal Infant Death at the Roman
Villa Site at Hambleden, Buckinghamshire, England. Journal of
Archaeological Science 38(8), pp. 1931-1938.
Richmond, I. 1969. The Plans of Roman Villas in Britain. In:
Rivet, A. L. F. ed. The Roman Villa in Britain. Routledge & Kegan and
Paul, London.
Smith, J. B. 1995. Interim Report on the Votive Material From
Romano Celtic Temple Sites in Oxfordshire. Oxoniensia 60, pp. 1-
27.
Smith, P. & Kahila, G. 1992. Indentification of Infanticide in
Archaeological Sites: A Case Study From the Late Roman, Early
Byzantine Periods at Ashkelon. Journal of Archaeological Science 19(6),
pp. 667-675.
Tooley, M. 1983. Abortion and Infanticide. Claredon Press. Oxford. 35