INFORMATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT ...

INFORMATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT REPORTS August 2007

VICTORIA’S AUDIT SYSTEM An environmental audit system has operated in Victoria since 1989. The Environment Protection Act 1970 (the Act) provides for the appointment by the Environment Protection Authority (EPA Victoria) of environmental auditors and the conduct of independent, high quality and rigorous environmental audits.

An environmental audit is an assessment of the condition of the environment, or the nature and extent of harm (or risk of harm) posed by an industrial process or activity, waste, substance or noise. Environmental audit reports are prepared by EPA-appointed environmental auditors who are highly qualified and skilled individuals.

Under the Act, the function of an environmental auditor is to conduct environmental audits and prepare environmental audit reports. Where an environmental audit is conducted to determine the condition of a site or its suitability for certain uses, an environmental auditor may issue either a certificate or statement of environmental audit.

A certificate indicates that the auditor is of the opinion that the site is suitable for any beneficial use defined in the Act, whilst a statement indicates that there is some restriction on the use of the site.

Any individual or organisation may engage appointed environmental auditors, who generally operate within the environmental consulting sector, to undertake environmental audits. The EPA administers the environmental audit system and ensures its ongoing integrity by assessing auditor applications and ensuring audits are independent and conducted with regard to guidelines issued by EPA.

AUDIT FILES STRUCTURE Environmental audit reports are stored digitally by EPA in three parts: the audit report (part A), report appendices (part B) and, where applicable, the certificate or statement of environmental audit and an executive summary (part C). A report may be in colour and black-and-white formats. Generally, only black-and-white documents are text searchable.

Report executive summaries, findings and recommendations should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole, including any appendices and, where applicable, any certificate or statement of environmental audit.

AUDIT REPORT CURRENCY

Audit reports are based on the conditions encountered and information reviewed at the time of preparation and do not represent any changes that may have occurred since the date of completion. As it is not possible for an audit to present all data that could be of interest to all readers, consideration should be made to any appendices or referenced documentation for further information.

When information regarding the condition of a site changes from that at the time an audit report is issued, or where an administrative or computation error is identified, environmental audit reports, certificates and statements may be withdrawn or amended by an environmental auditor. Users are advised to check EPA’s website to ensure the currency of the audit document.

PDF SEARCHABILITY AND PRINTING EPA Victoria can only certify the accuracy and correctness of the audit report and appendices as presented in the hardcopy format. EPA is not responsible for any issues that arise due to problems with PDF files or printing.

Except where PDF normal format is specified, PDF files are scanned and optical character recognised by machine only. Accordingly, while the images are consistent with the scanned original, the searchable hidden text may contain uncorrected recognition errors that can reduce search reliability. Therefore, keyword searches undertaken within the document may not retrieve all references to the queried text.

This PDF has been created using the Adobe-approved method for generating Print Optimised Output. To assure proper results, proofs must be printed, rather than viewed on the screen.

This PDF is compatible with Adobe Acrobat Reader Version 4.0 or any later version which is downloadable free from Adobe’s Website, www.adobe.com.

FURTHER INFORMATION For more information on Victoria’s environmental audit system, visit EPA’s website or contact EPA’s Environmental Audit Unit.

Web: www.epa.vic.gov.au/envaudit

Email: [email protected]

of 282

http://www.epa.vic.gov.au/envaudit/environmental_audits.asp

http://www.adobe.com/

http://www.epa.vic.gov.au/envaudit

mailto:[email protected]?subject=Electronic Audit Report Enquiry - PDF Info Sheet

Y0005:JPM:18820 EAR CARMS 71254-2 May 2016

Appendix A: Certificate of Title and

Planning Permit Documentation

of 282

VOLUME 08943 FOLIO 219 Security no : 124057567744T Produced 26/10/2015 11:57 am

LAND DESCRIPTION

Lot 4 on Plan of Subdivision 042861. PARENT TITLE Volume 05931 Folio 123 Created by instrument E467809 21/07/1972

REGISTERED PROPRIETOR

Estate Fee Simple Joint Proprietors TERENCE YUEN JENNY YUEN both of 25 JOHN STREET CLIFTON HILL VIC 3068 AL663358M 05/02/2015

ENCUMBRANCES, CAVEATS AND NOTICES

MORTGAGE AL663359K 05/02/2015 WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION Any encumbrances created by Section 98 Transfer of Land Act 1958 or Section 24 Subdivision Act 1988 and any other encumbrances shown or entered on the plan or imaged folio set out under DIAGRAM LOCATION below.

DIAGRAM LOCATION

SEE LP042861 FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND BOUNDARIES

ACTIVITY IN THE LAST 125 DAYS

NIL ------------------------END OF REGISTER SEARCH STATEMENT------------------------ Additional information: (not part of the Register Search Statement) Street Address: 25 JOHN STREET CLIFTON HILL VIC 3068 DOCUMENT END

Copyright State of Victoria. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the CopyrightAct and for the purposes of Section 32 of the Sale of Land Act 1962 or pursuant to a written agreement. The information is only valid at the time and in the formobtained from the LANDATA REGD TM System. The State of Victoria accepts no responsibility for any subsequent release, publication or reproduction of theinformation.

REGISTER SEARCH STATEMENT (Title Search) Transfer of Land Act 1958

Page 1 of 1

Title 8943/219 Page 1 of 1

of 282

of 282


Appendix B: Proposed Development

Plans

of 282

of 282


Appendix C: Assessor Reports

of 282

16 March 2016 Jenny Yuen 25 John Street Clifton Hill Vic 3068 Email: [email protected] Dear Jenny,

RE: 25 John Street, Clifton Hill

Please find attached the Environmental Site Assessment report for works conducted at the above site. Should you require further information regarding this report or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely,

Tony Connolly Environmental Consultant

4 Allee Street Brighton Vic. 3186 Telephone: 03 9503 0107

Mobile: 0431 533480 Email: [email protected] Web: www.enviroassess.com.au

of 282

Environmental Assessment Services Pty Ltd ESA March 2016

DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION

Report File I.D.

Date Version Issued To No. Copies Initials

ESA March 2016

16/03/2016 2 Jenny Yuen 1 Electronic Copy

TC

Sally Bonham Jeremy McDonnel (Prensa Pty Ltd)

1 Electronic Copy

TC

of 282

JENNY YUEN

JOB NO: 15029 MARCH 2016

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

25 John Street,

Clifton Hill

4 Allee Street Brighton Vic. 3186 Telephone: 03 9503 0107

Mobile: 0431 533 480 Email: [email protected] Web: www.enviroassess.com.au

of 282


ABBREVIATIONS

ASLP Australian Standard Leachate Procedure

BH Borehole

EIL Ecological Investigation Level

EPA Environmental Protection Authority

ESA Environmental Site Assessment

GQRUZ Groundwater quality restricted use zone

MAHs Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

mg/kg Milligrams per kilogram

mg/L Milligrams per litre

NATA National Association of Testing Authorities

NEPC National Environment Protection Council

NEPM National Environment Protection Measure

OCPs Organochlorine pesticides

PAHs Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

PCBs Polychlorinated biphenyls

PID Photo-ionisation detector

QA/QC Quality assurance / quality control

RHSV Royal Historical Society of Victoria

RPD Relative percentage difference

SEPP State Environment Protection Policy

TPHs Total petroleum hydrocarbons

TRHs Total recoverable hydrocarbons

VHCs Volatile halogenated compounds

of 282


i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document is an Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report prepared by Environmental Assessment Services Pty Ltd (EAS) for Jenny Yuen. The report relates to assessment works conducted at the subject site located at 25 John Street, Clifton Hill (Site). The works were undertaken during the period November 2015 to February 2016. The existing terrace house is proposed for renovation, which utilises the existing building footprint and adds an extension to the rear of the premises. The site resides in an Environmental Audit Overlay. Accordingly, Yarra City Council requires the issuance of a Certificate or Statement of Environmental Audit in accordance with Section IXD of the Environment Protection Act 1970. The objective of the ESA was to assess the contamination status of the Site to facilitate the requirements of the Statutory Environmental Audit, through background investigations and site assessment works. Site History & Potential Site Contamination Background investigations identified that the existing terrace house has been occupied by several land owners since the turn of the twentieth century with very little (if any) development works. Potential sources of on-site contamination were identified to include imported fill and building materials. Completed audit sites in the area commonly reported raised levels of metals (including barium, cobalt, chromium, lead, nickel, and zinc) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs in site filling material. During the Statutory Environmental Audit of at the adjacent land parcel (No. 2 Spensley Street), asbestos containing materials were identified in site filling material. No asbestos containing materials were identified in site filling material encountered at the subject site. Off-site historical sources of potential contamination were identified to include a fuel merchant, steel equipment manufacturers and timbers yards. Soil Assessment During the course of the site investigation works, five soil boreholes were established in accessible areas of the site. Results of soil sample analysis identified a number of metals (cadmium, lead, tin and zinc), Total PAHs and benzo(a)pyrene in fill material above the adopted ecological and/or health based criteria. There were no vapour intrusion exceedances. The reported concentrations of lead and carcinogenic PAHs as B(a)P TEQ in fill material samples were reported above the adopted “Standard-Density Residential” land use criteria with concentrations of Carcinogenic PAHs as B(a)P TEQ also exceeding the adopted “High-Density Residential” land use criteria. Consequently, a site specific Human Health Risk Appraisal (HHRA) was carried out on the identified contaminants of concern. The proposed rear extension increases the size of the existing building footprint, further reducing access to soils at the site. In addition, paving is to be applied in open areas along with the introduction of 100 – 200 mm of top soil in areas where soil would remain accessible.

of 282


Human Health Risk Appraisal Based on the raised contaminants of concern identified at the site, Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd completed at Human Health Risk Appraisal to quantify potential risks to human health associated with the presence of contamination that remains beneath the site and identify if any additional risk management measures may be required. Based on the findings of the HHRA, it was determined that “Given the concentrations of lead reported, it is recommended that a layer of clean fill (0.1-0.2 metres deep) is laid over existing surface soils in the front yard and those areas in the back yard where accessible soils will remain is sufficient to limit exposure for residents. Applying such a layer will also limit exposure to other contaminants in the soil”. In addition to the proposed extension works and outdoor paving, in accordance with the recommendations of the HHRA, 100 – 200 mm of top soil is to be applied across areas where soil would remain accessible. Groundwater Assessment A desktop appraisal of available groundwater information identified that groundwater was generally intersected at approximately 10.0 metres below ground level in Newer Volcanic Basalt. The inferred direction of local groundwater flow was to the south east. A review of groundwater chemical data generated at nearby completed audit sites indicated elevated concentrations of several metals, ammonia, nitrate and cyanide which were considered to be either background conditions or representative of regional groundwater quality. Given the local groundwater conditions, the groundwater is considered to be polluted. Accordingly, an Auditor determined Clean Up to the Extent Practicable (CUTEP) process will be necessary and the site be designated a Groundwater Quality Restricted Use Zone (GQRUZ) which would require appropriate groundwater testing prior to any future use. Based on background investigations and results of soil sample analyses, the subject site is not considered a source of local groundwater pollution.

The on-site groundwater beneficial uses are considered unlikely.

The beneficial uses of the land is not impacted by polluted groundwater.

As no clean-up of groundwater is considered necessary, there is no requirement to access to the site to clean up polluted groundwater. Conclusion Based on the findings of the background investigations and the intrusive soil investigation works, the on-going use of the site for standard residential proposes, which will extend the existing building footprint and reduce access to soils via application of outdoor paving and 100-200 mm top soil, would not be precluded.

of 282


TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY….………………………………………………………………………..…………i

1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1

2 SCOPE OF WORK ....................................................................................................................... 1

2.1 Objective............................................................................................................................... 1

2.2 Scope for Background Investigation ..................................................................................... 1

2.3 Scope for Site Assessment .................................................................................................. 1

3 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 2

3.1 Site Description .................................................................................................................... 2

3.2 Site History Review .............................................................................................................. 3

3.3 Review of Statutory Environmental Audits ........................................................................... 6

3.4 Potential Site Contamination ................................................................................................ 9

3.5 Geology & Hydrogeology Review ....................................................................................... 10

4 SITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ................................................................................................ 11

4.1 Soil Component .................................................................................................................. 11

4.2 Groundwater Component ................................................................................................... 13

5 SITE ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................. 15

5.1 Soil Component .................................................................................................................. 15

5.2 Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) ..................................................................... 17

6 RESULTS OF SITE ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................... 19

6.1 Soil Component .................................................................................................................. 19

6.2 Quality Assurance / Quality Control .................................................................................... 20

7 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 22

8 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................. 23

8.1 Soil Component .................................................................................................................. 23

8.2 Groundwater Component ................................................................................................... 25

9 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................... 29

9.1 Site History & Potential Site Contamination ....................................................................... 29

9.2 Soil Assessment ................................................................................................................. 29

9.3 Human Health Risk Appraisal ............................................................................................. 29

9.4 Groundwater Assessment .................................................................................................. 30

9.5 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 30

10 LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................................. 31

11 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 31

of 282


FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Locality Plan

Figure 2 Site Investigation Plan

TABLES

Table 1 Soil Analytical Results (and accompanying Quality Control Tables)

Table 2 Soil ASLP Analytical Results APPENDICIES A Proposed Development Plans

B Planning Permit

C Certificates of Title

D Extract of the EPA Priority Sites Register

E Aerial Photographs

F MMBW Sewer Plan

G EnergySafe Victoria Certification

H WorkSafe Victoria Certification

I Visualising Victoria’s Groundwater Portal Map

J Groundwater Quality Restricted Zone Pans

K Groundwater Resources Map

L State Groundwater Bore Database Reports

M Data Quality Objectives

N Soil Borehole Log Sheets

O Field Equipment Certificates

P Site Photographs

Q Ecological Investigation Level Calculation Sheets

R Analytical Laboratory Reports & Chain of Custody Forms

S Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd Human Health Risk Appraisal

of 282


Page 1

1 INTRODUCTION

This document is an Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report prepared by Environmental Assessment Services Pty Ltd (EAS) for Jenny Yuen. The report relates to assessment works conducted at the subject site located at 25 John Street, Clifton Hill (Site). The works were undertaken during the period November 2015 to February 2016. The existing terrace house is proposed for renovation, which utilises the existing building footprint and adds an extension to the rear of the premises. Appendix A presents the proposed development plans. The site resides in an Environmental Audit Overlay. Accordingly, Yarra City Council requires the issuance of a Certificate or Statement of Environmental Audit in accordance with Section IXD of the Environment Protection Act 1970. Appendix B provides the Planning Permit for the site.

2 SCOPE OF WORK

2.1 Objective

The objective of the ESA was to assess the contamination status of the Site to facilitate the requirements of the Statutory Environmental Audit, through background investigations and site assessment works.

2.2 Scope for Background Investigation

The scope of the background investigation included: Site description. Site history review. Review of nearby Statutory Environmental Audit reports. Potential site contamination review. Geology and hydrogeology review.

2.3 Scope for Site Assessment The scope of the site assessment included: Soil assessment component. Provide sufficient information to allow for a Human Health Risk Appraisal to be prepared for the

site. Provide sufficient information to allow for the preparation of Environmental Audit Report to

relevant Authorities.

of 282


Page 2

3 BACKGROUND

3.1 Site Description

Address: 25 John Street, Clifton Hill

Local Council: Yarra City Council

Title Information: Volume: 08943 Folio: 219. Certificates of Title are presented in Appendix C, along with the plan of subdivision (Lot 4 LP42861)and titles researched from 1890.

GIS coordinates of site centroid:

GDA94 Decimal Degrees: - Latitude 37.7882°; - Longitude 144.996003°

Surface area: Approximately 140 m2

Planning zone: Mixed Use Zone (MUZ)

Planning overlay: Environmental Audit Overlay (EAO) Heritage Overlay (HO)

Current occupant/s: The site is currently occupied by a two storey brick house with residential occupants.

Priority site registry: The site nor adjacent sites are currently listed. Appendix D presents an Extract of Priority Sites Register dated November 2015).

Figure 1 provided at the end of this report presents the Site Locality Plan. Figure 2 presents the site Investigation Plan. The current site description and layout includes: An elongated rectangular parcel of land. One double storey brick house occupies the majority of the site. A small landscaped garden is present along the John Street frontage. At the rear of the house is a backyard with artificial grass, vegetation, garden areas and paving. The site is flat with no distinct slope. Access is gained from John Street to the west. Surrounding land uses include: Standard-density residential premises to the north. Relatively recently constructed double storey high-density residential premises to the east. Standard-density residential premises to the south. Over John Street is Clifton Hill Railway station to the west of the site. A locality review of existing reserves for potential former landfilling activities was undertaken, which identified the following reserves: Coulson Reserve to the approximately 200 metres to the north. Quarries Park, Hall Reserve & Ramsden Street Reserve approximately 550 metres to the

east-south east. Victoria Park approximately one kilometre the south. Mayors Park and Collingwood Leisure Centre approximately 125 metres to the west Darling Gardens approximately 275 metres to the south west.

of 282


Page 3

A review of the Appendix 1 of Victorian EPA Publication 1270 Assessment of the Potential for Methane Gas Movement from Victorian Landfills (February 2009), did not identify any nearby former landfill sites. Although Quarries Park has been backfilled to allow for the existing parkland use. Given the distance and inferred south easterly flow of local groundwater, beneficial uses associated with the subject site are not expected to have been impacted by former landfilling activities.

3.2 Site History Review

3.2.1 Royal Historical Society of Victoria Search & Review The Royal Historical Society of Victoria was contracted to undertake a desktop review of former land use at the subject site which identified the following historical information: This site is located on the east side of John Street, in the block between Spensley St to the south and George Street to the north. This site is occupied by a Victorian two-storey terrace, the middle in a row of seven. The site is currently in a predominantly residential area with a parking lot and railway station, built in 1888, situated on the west side of John Street. The Sands & McDougall Directories first list John Street in 1887. There are only three properties recorded at this stage, and all are noted as residential. In 1889 “Railway Terrace” comprising of numbers 1 to 7 is listed. The house numbers are changed in the early 1890s to the current street addresses. There are other properties in the area worth noting as follows: Throughout the early 1900s until circa 1940, other properties in John Street included a plaster

manufacturer, engineers and toy manufacturers, as well as timber merchants and a timber yard.

The Lilley Brothers Engineers was established at #33 in the 1920s, becoming metal stampers temporarily in 1940.

Millson & Sons plaster manufacturers occupied #14 to #18 between 1930 and 1940. From 1889 until 1925, #3 was occupied by W. J. Brewer, timber merchants. The timber yard for this company was initially located on the west side of John Street in 1889 before moving to #37 in the early 1920s.

Since the 1940s, Sands & McDougall lists these properties as residential.

of 282


Page 4

3.2.2 Review of Historical Aerial Photos

A review of available historical aerial photographs dated 1931, 1945, 1960, 1979, 1989 and 2009 was undertaken. Appendix E presents the aerial photographs. The findings of the review are presented below.

Year Description of Site and Surroundings

1931

The set of seven terrace houses (constructed Circa 1890) are present in the 1931 photograph, with the subject site situated in the middle. The railway line is present to the west. Open parkland is further west with what appears to be tennis courts. A commercial/industrial premises are located to the east of the site. Although the layout of the site is difficult to depict, a larger building appears to reside at the northern end of the premises. The surrounding area appears to be a mixture of residential and commercial/industrial properties.

1945

The terrace houses are clearly identified in the 1945 photograph. The land use to the east remains a railway, parkland and a set of four tennis courts. The commercial/industrial property to the east contains a larger building at the north end and open land and possibly sheds over the southern portion of the site. The site/s directly north of the terrace houses do not appear to be residential type uses, with the area being either open of covered by commercial/industrial buildings. Over Spensley Street to the south is a commercial/industrial premises with several buildings and structures indicative of such a use.

1960

The terrace houses remain. Similar surrounding conditions remain, although not notable, the layout of the commercial/industrial premises to the east has altered to some degree. The Heidelberg Road overpass is evident to the north of the site.

1979 The terrace houses remain. Similar surrounding conditions remain, although once again, the layout of the commercial/industrial premises to the east has altered with a commercial/industrial building occupying the entire site.

1989 The terrace houses remain. Again similar surrounding conditions remain, including the layout of the commercial/industrial premises to the east still being occupied by commercial/industrial building across the entire site.

2009

The terrace houses remain. Again similar surrounding conditions remain, including the layout of the commercial/industrial premises to the east still being occupied by commercial/industrial building across the entire site. A review of aerial images from 2009, identified that the commercial premises to the east was demolished in 2010 and left vacant until 2014 when building works commenced on the existing apartment building.

of 282


Page 5

3.2.3 Review of Land Titles A review of the historical land titles regarding site proprietorship between 1890 – 2015 has been undertaken. Appendix C presents the Certificates of Title, which provide the following details:

Year Details Site Proprietorship

Volume 2277 Folio 455391 (land parcels between Spensley and northern ROW)

1890 John Vale – land agent & William Frederick Vale – auctioneer

1899 William Henry Spry & Samuel Edwin Spry – boot manufacturers

1909 James Augustus Barrett – clerk & William Thomas Ahern – clerk & Herbert Gill Howgate – boot manufacturer

1918 James Augustus Barrett – clerk & William Thomas - clerk

1921 James Augustus Barrett

Volume 5931 Folio 1186123 (land parcels between Spensley and northern ROW)

1934 Joint proprietors Frank Augustus Barrett – bank clerk and Albert John Willim Ahern – medical practitioner

1936 Samuel Bodington Tottle - gentleman

1938 Six joint proprietors, all ladies referenced as either married woman, spinster, widow or private secretary

1954 Five surviving joint proprietors, again all ladies and referenced as either married woman, spinster, widow or private secretary

1956 Four surviving joint proprietors, again all ladies and referenced as either married woman, spinster or widow

1957 Winifred Frances Carnegie - spinster

1964 Three men proprietors – tenants in common.

1969 Housing commission

1972 Land transfer registered

Volume 8943 Folio 219 (Lot 4 - No. 25 John Street)

1972 Toni Bros Investments Pty Ltd

1973 Thomas and Emmy Papadopoulos – Joint proprietors

1973 William Bell – policeman

1977-1988 Several mortgage institutions.

1988 Caveat from Police Association Credit Co-operative Limited

1989 Kelli-Jane Green & Ross Graham Hume - proprietors

of 282


Page 6

Year Details Site Proprietorship

2000 Kelli-Jane Green & Paul Kenneth Barclay – joint proprietors

2002-2006 Caveats and Mortgage registers

2006 Kate Louse Ryan – sole proprietor

2015 Terrance & Jenny Yuen - joint proprietors

In summary the site has been occupied by several land owners since the turn of the twentieth century with very little (if any) development works. 3.2.4 Review of Historical Sewer Plan A review of the 1904 MMBW historical sewer plan sourced from the State Library database shows the existing terrace house footprints as we see it today. All houses (including the subject site) have baths, toilets, kitchens and rear culverts. Appendix F presents the 1901 sewer plan. The adjacent site to the rear (east) is a commercial / industrial premises (identified in the completed audit report as being a dairy from 1890’s – 1920’s when the MMBW plan was produced). All other areas of the site are devoid of below ground services at this time. 3.2.5 Energy Safe Victoria Cathodic Protection System Search The results of the Energy Safe Victoria Cathodic Protection System Database failed to identify any cathodic protection systems at the subject site. Appendix G presents the EnergySafe Victoria certification. 3.2.6 WorkSafe Dangerous Goods Database Review The results of the WorkSafe Victoria Dangerous Goods Database review returned no results of records for dangerous goods storage and handling for the subject site. The WorkSafe certification is presented in Appendix H.

3.3 Review of Statutory Environmental Audits

A review of Visualising Victoria’s Groundwater Portal identified eight completed Environmental Audits (i.e. Statements and Certificates) sites within 150 metre radius of the subject site. Appendix I presents Visualising Vitoria’s Groundwater Portal Map depicting the location of the eight Audit sites in relation to the subject site. The eight sites reviewed as part of this appraisal included: 2 Spensley Street, Clifton Hill (CARMS No. 68214-1) located behind the site to the east.

Statement issued 02.07.2011. Intrusive groundwater investigation was conducted. 5 Spensley Street, Clifton Hill (CARMS No. 51607-1) located approximately 40 m to the south.

Statement issued 4.06.2003. Intrusive groundwater investigation was not conducted. 7-9 Spensley Street, Clifton Hill (CARMS No. 38091-1) located approximately 40 m to the

south. Statement issued 29.09.1999. Intrusive groundwater investigation was not conducted. 33 Spensley Clifton Hill (CARMS No. 26266-1) located approximately 115 m to the south east.

Certificate issued 10.10.1995. Intrusive groundwater investigation was not conducted. 43 Grant Street, Clifton Hill (CARMS No. 71174-1) located approximately 60 m to the north.

Statement issued 23.04.2014. Intrusive groundwater investigation was not conducted.

of 282


Page 7

43 John Street, Clifton Hill (CARMS No. 39416-1) located approximately 70 m to the north. Statement issued 17.12.1999. Intrusive groundwater investigation was not conducted.

3 Heidelberg Road, Clifton Hill (CARMS No. 2834-1) located approximately 100 m to the north-north west. Statement issued 17.10.2003. Intrusive groundwater investigation was not conducted.

5 Heidelberg Road, Clifton Hill (CARMS No. 55093-1) located approximately 110 m to the north. Statement issued 07.12.2004. Intrusive groundwater investigation was not conducted.

3.3.1 Soil Conditions The sites were identified to contain some residual metal and PAH contamination associated with former land use and importation of poor quality fill. Previous land uses were identified to include a timber yard, printer, textile cutting, use of an incinerator, leather manufacturer and a boning factory. Local soils typically included a relatively shallow fill profile underlain by basaltic clays associated with the underlying Newer Volcanics basalt. A representation of fill quality in the area is provided at No. 43 John Street, which returned raised concentrations of lead (ranging between 738 – 1,400 mg/kg), zinc (ranging between 851 – 1,200 mg/kg), total PAHs (ranging between 40 – 44.3 mg/kg) and benzo (a) pyrene (ranging between 4.5 – 4.7 mg/kg). 3.3.2 Groundwater Conditions Only one of the above eight sites included an intrusive groundwater investigation, as the findings of the most audits considered that groundwater in the area is likely to be polluted although the sites had not been considered a source of groundwater pollution. Fortunately, the site directly adjacent to the subject site to the east (No. 2 Spensley Street) had an intrusive groundwater investigation carried out during 2011. The intrusive groundwater investigation included the installation of a groundwater monitoring well to 22.5 metres which recorded a standing water level of 19.0 metres. Although not being able to be calculated at the site, the inferred groundwater flow direction was nominated to be to the south east (i.e. cross/down-gradient to the subject site). The groundwater was identified to be polluted with ammonia, cyanide and nitrate as well as containing elevated concentrations of copper and zinc), which were considered to represent background conditions of regional pollution and not sourced from the site and were likely to be associated with leaking sewers. Three other audits have been completed more than 200 metres further north of the subject site, over Heidelberg Road which included intrusive groundwater investigations are summarised below:

217 - 241 Queens Road, Fitzroy North: investigation works were carried out in 2014 which identified historical land uses to include automotive repairs. Groundwater was intersected at 17.0 metres with a calculated to flow to the south east. Elevated levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons, monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ammonia were reported in groundwater samples. Leaking sewer or stormwater considered to be the source of ammonia and an unknown off-site source of the petroleum contamination (potentially Dummett Crescent, Fitzroy North).

243 - 247 Queens Road, Fitzroy North: investigation works were carried out in 2015 which identified historical land uses to include automotive repairs. Groundwater was intersected at 16.0 metres with a calculated to flow to the south. Elevated levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons and monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were reported in groundwater samples. The contamination was attributed to an unknown off-site source (potentially Dummett Crescent, Fitzroy North).

of 282


Page 8

18 - 20 High Street Northcote: investigation works were carried out in 2009 which identified historical land uses to include shoe manufacturing and textile works. Groundwater was intersected at 8.0 – 14.0 metres with a calculated to flow to the south – south west. Concentrations of selenium, nitrate, trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene were reported above the adopted criteria. The subject site was not considered the source of the pollution.

The chemical condition of groundwater at each site did not require clean-up or preclude the proposed residential land use. The closest site with a Groundwater Quality Restricted Use Zone (GQRUZ) is 26-36 High Street, Northcote located approximately 625 metres to the north of the subject site. The next closest site with a GQRUZ is 204 Noone Street, Clifton Hill located approximately 725 metres to the south east and then 163-175 Noone Street, Clifton Hill located approximately 750 metres to the south east. Appendix J presents the GQRUZ maps. A summary of the groundwater investigations is provided below:

26 - 36 High Street: investigation works were carried out in 2002 which identified historical land uses to include dying chemical works. Polluted groundwater was intersected at 14.0 metres with a calculated to flow to the south.

204 Noone Street: investigation works were carried out in 2007 which identified historical land uses to include fabric dying. Polluted groundwater was intersected between 6.6 metres and 9.9 metres with a calculated to flow to the south east.

163-175 Noone Street: investigation works were carried out in 2009 which identified historical land uses to include a tannery, shoe manufacturer and fabric dying. Polluted groundwater was intersected at an average depth of 7.0 metres with a calculated to flow to the south east.

Based on the findings of the audits and distance to the subject site (i.e. over 600 metres down-hydraulic gradient to the High Street site and over 700 metres up-hydraulic gradient from the Noone Street sites), the polluted groundwater is not considered a potential risk to beneficial uses at the subject site. 3.3.3 Findings All sites commonly reported raised levels of metals and PAHs in site filling material. The intrusive groundwater investigations generally intersected groundwater at approximately 10.0 metres below ground level in Newer Volcanics Basalt. The inferred direction of groundwater flow was to the south east. A review of groundwater chemical data generated at near-by completed audit sites indicted elevated concentrations of several metals, ammonia, nitrate and cyanide which were considered to be either background conditions or representative of regional groundwater quality. The environmental conditions of the completed audit sites are not expected to impact on the existing or proposed uses of the subject site for residential land use.

of 282


Page 9

3.4 Potential Site Contamination Based on the background information, a summary of potential site contamination is provided below:

Potential Source Potential Contaminants

On-Site:

Imported fill: Metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons, pH, sulphate.

Building materials: Asbestos containing materials (i.e. cement sheet).

Off-Site:

Fuel Merchant (2 Spensley St):

Total petroleum hydrocarbons, monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and lead.

Steel equipment manufacturer (2 Spensley St):

Total petroleum hydrocarbons, monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and metals.

Textile cutting workshop (5 Spensley St):

Chromium, titanium, cobalt, sulfur and nitrogen organic compounds, sulfates, solvents.

Former timber yards along Grant Street:

Chromium, copper, arsenic, naphthalene, ammonia, pentachlorophenol, dibenzofuran, anthracene, biphenyl, ammonium sulphate, quinoline, boron, creosote, organochlorine pesticides

Leaking sewer: Ammonia, nitrate, metals, total petroleum hydrocarbons, monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons.

of 282


Page 10

3.5 Geology & Hydrogeology Review

3.5.1 Regional Geology The “Melbourne” 1:63,360 map indicates that the site is underlain Quaternary Newer Volcanics basalt, comprising vesicular fine to medium grained olivine basalts. Clay and highly weathered basalt occupy the upper confines of these deposits. The New Volcanics basalt are underlain by Silurian Aged sandstones, interbedded massive siltstones and shales. 3.5.2 Hydrogeology, Surface Water Receptors & Groundwater Use The closest surface water body is Merri Creek, located approximately 340 metres to the north of the subject site. The Yarra River is located approximately one kilometre to the south east. Intrusive groundwater investigation carried out in the area generally intersected groundwater at approximately 10.0 metres in the fractured Newer Volcanics basalt aquifer. A review of the Department of Environment Land, Water and Planning on-line Groundwater Resource Report indicated that groundwater occurs at 10 - 20 metres with total dissolved solids values considered to be in the range of 1,001 – 3,500 mg/L. The Groundwater Resource Report is presented in Appendix K. A search of the State Groundwater Bore Database carried out in February 2016 returned a total of 119 bore records within a 2.0 kilometre radius of the site. Appendix L presents the State Groundwater Database Bore Reports, sourced from Visualising Victoria’s Groundwater on-line database. Bore installation depths ranged between 3.4 – 64.2 metres. Bores installed into basalt had screens installed between 1.5 – 28 metres. Bores installed into siltstone had screens installed between 6 – 58.7 metres. Bores installed into clay had screens installed between 9 - 16 metres. One bore installed into sand had a screen installed between 37.5 – 40.5 metres. There were no aquifer depths, standing water levels or chemical data reported. No bores were listed for domestic use. The only listed bore use were investigation and observation.

of 282


Page 11

4 SITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

4.1 Soil Component 4.1.1 Beneficial Uses The Victorian Government State Environment Protection Policy (SEPP) Prevention and Management of Contamination of Land, June 2002 (Land SEPP), nominates the following beneficial uses of the land to be protected: Maintenance of ecosystems (in this case, ‘highly modified’ ecosystems); Human health; Buildings and structures; Aesthetics, and Production of food, flora and fibre (not protected for the proposed Sensitive Use – Low Density). The primary criteria referenced for each beneficial use are listed below in Sections 4.1.2 - 4.1.7. Where a guideline reference does not exist for a particular analyte, reference has been made to alternative guidelines1 as nominated on the relevant analytical results tables. 4.1.2 Maintenance of Ecosystems The National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) developed the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure [NEPM] during 1999. The NEPC agreed to a revision of the NEPM during April 2013 (ASC NEPM). This document (and guidelines therein) has been adopted as the primary reference to interpret results of analyses with respect to the protection of the beneficial land use ‘Maintenance of Ecosystems’. The ASC NEPM 2013 provides guidelines for both ecological investigation levels (EILs) and ecological screening levels (ESLs). EILs are referenced to establish where further investigation may be required for various contaminants and are dependent upon specific soil characteristics. The most relevant EILs applied using the ASC NEPM is considered to be ‘Aged’ urban residential/public open space, which protects 80% of species and soil microbial processes appropriate to this modified urban setting and are generally relatable to the top two metres. The site specific parameters utilised to establish ecological investigation levels for site filling material and natural soils are presented in the following table (overleaf).

1 Alternative guidelines include: Environmental Investigation Levels from the joint Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council/National

Health and Medical Research Council 1992 publication Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites.

USEPA 2012 Preliminary Remediation Goals for the support of Residential and Industrial Land Uses. Netherlands Soil Remediation Circular – Intervention Values (2013) Residential and Commercial Land Use criteria from the 2002 Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment Health Screening Levels for

Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil and Groundwater 2011 (Health Screening Levels for Vapour Intrusion) The Victorian EPA 2009 Publication IWRG621 “Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines - Soil Hazard Characterisation and

Management”. New South Wales EPA 1994, “Guidelines for Assessing Service Station Sites” (Threshold Concentrations for Sensitive Land Use)

– document replaced by NSW EPA Technical Note: Investigation of Service Station Sites (2014).

of 282


Page 12

Soil Type CEC

(cmolc/kg dwt)

pH (CaCl)

Organic Carbon

Content (%)% Clay

Iron Content (%)

State Traffic Volume

FILL: 39 6.8 6.8 7.5 2.6

Victoria

“HIGH” - Railway station has relatively high traffic volume during working week. Heidelberg Road located approximately 125 metres to the north.

NATRUAL: 23 7 1.5 30 2.3

ESLs are referenced for petroleum hydrocarbons and benzo (a) pyrene to establish where further investigation may be required. ESLs are assigned to fine and course grained soils and are generally relatable to the top two metres. 4.1.3 Human Health The ASC NEPM (and guidelines therein) has been adopted as the primary reference to interpret results of analyses with respect to the protection of the beneficial land use ‘Human Health’. The ASC NEPM nominates Health Investigation Levels (HILs) for the protection of human health. Based on the proposed / continued standard-density residential landuse, primary reference is made to Setting ‘A’ (where accessible soils exist), to assess potential health risks to construction workers and where accessible soils may remain. Consideration has also been given to Setting ‘B’ (for residential with minimal opportunities for soil access; includes dwellings with fully and permanently paved yard space such as high-rise buildings and apartments) should there be no access available to soils. 4.1.4 Buildings and Structures Buildings and structures are usually assessed through site observations and analytical results such as pH and sulphate. The Land SEPP indicates that “contamination must not cause the land to be corrosive to or adversely affect the integrity of structures or building materials”. Soil pH and sulphate levels can also be compared to guidance provided in Section 6 of the Australian Piling Code (AS2159-2009). 4.1.5 Aesthetics No chemical soil guidelines currently exist for the protection of this beneficial use. Aesthetics are usually assessed through site observations such as colour, odour and presence of waste (i.e. building and industrial wastes). The Land SEPP indicates that “contamination must not cause the land to be offensive to the senses of human beings”. 4.1.6 Production of Food, Flora and Fibre The intended use of the site does not include the production of food, flora or fibre; accordingly, the criteria specified in the Australia New Zealand Food Authority, Food Standards Code has not been incorporated into the analytical results tables.

of 282


Page 13

4.1.7 Classification of Waste Soils Classification of soils proposed for off-site disposal should be undertaken in accordance with the Environment Protection (Industrial Waste Resource) Regulations (2009), applied in conjunction with the Victorian EPA (2009) Publication IWRG621, Industrial Waste Resource Guideline - Soil Hazard Categorisation and Management”.

4.2 Groundwater Component 4.2.1 Beneficial Uses Although an intrusive groundwater investigation was not conducted at the subject site, a desktop appraisal of local groundwater data has been undertaken. The Victorian Government State Environment Protection Policy (SEPP) Groundwaters of Victoria, 1997 (Groundwater SEPP), nominates the following beneficial uses of groundwater to be protected according to the total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration of the groundwater:

Beneficial Use

Segments According to TDS Concentrations (mg/L)

A1 (0-500)

A2 (501-1,000)

B (1,001-3,500)

C (3,501-13,000)

D (>13,000)

Maintenance of ecosystems:

Potable water supply-desirable:

Potable water supply-acceptable:

Potable mineral water supply:

Agriculture, parks and gardens:

Stock watering:

Industrial water use:

Primary contact recreation:

Buildings and structures:

NOTE: shading applied to Segment B as being applicable to the subject Site.

The primary criteria referenced for each beneficial use are listed below in Sections 4.2.2 - 4.2.9. Where a guideline reference does not exist for a particular analyte, reference has been made to alternative guidelines2.

2 Alternative guidelines include: Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council / Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia

and New Zealand 2000, “National Water Quality Management Strategy” (95% Level of Protection trigger values). Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council 1992 Australian Water Quality Guidelines for Fresh and Marine

Waters Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment 2013 “Environmental quality standards in the Netherlands

- A review of environmental quality standards and their policy framework in the Netherlands” (Dutch values). Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination and Remediation of the Environment - Groundwater Health Screening Levels for

Vapour Intrusion (2011)

of 282


Page 14

4.2.2 Maintenance of Ecosystems Victorian Government State Environment Protection Variation of the State Environment Protection Policy (Waters of Victoria) – (Schedule F7) - Waters of Yarra River and Tributaries (1999), along with the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council / Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand 2000, “National Water Quality Management Strategy” (95% Level of Protection trigger values). 4.2.3 Potable Water Supply The National Health and Medical Research Council / National Resource Management Ministerial Council 2016 “Australian Drinking Water Guidelines” (Health & Aesthetic values). 4.2.4 Potable Mineral Water Supply The subject site is not located within a recognised mineral water supply zone. Accordingly, no criteria have been applied for this beneficial use. 4.2.5 Agriculture, Parks and Gardens The Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council / Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand 2000, “National Water Quality Management Strategy” (Primary Industries Irrigation & General Water Use; Long Term Trigger Values). 4.2.6 Stock Watering The Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council / Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand 2000, “National Water Quality Management Strategy” (Primary Industries Livestock values).

4.2.7 Industrial Water Use Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council 1992 Australian Water Quality Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Waters. Section 6 of the document segregates a number of industrial processes. 4.2.8 Primary Contact Recreation The Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council / Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand 2000, “National Water Quality Management Strategy” (Recreational Water & Aesthetics values). Consideration has also been given to guidance provided in the National Health and Medical Research Council (2008) Guidelines for Managing Risks in Recreational Water. 4.2.9 Buildings and Structures No chemical groundwater guidelines currently exist for the protection of this beneficial use. Buildings and structures are usually assessed through site observations and recordings as well as analytical results such as pH and sulphate. The Groundwater SEPP indicates that “introduced contaminants shall not cause groundwater to become corrosive to structures or building materials”.

of 282


Page 15

5 SITE ASSESSMENT

Sampling procedures for the collection of all soil samples are to be conducted in accordance with the following standard procedures: National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) (1999) National Environment Protection

(Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM) and 2013 variation amending instrument;

Standards Australia AS 4482.1 (2005) Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil - Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds;

Standards Australia AS 4482.2 (1999) Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil - Volatile substances;

Victorian EPA Publication IWRG702 (2009) ‘Industrial Waste Resource Guideline - Soil Sampling’:

Victorian EPA Publication (2009) WRG621, Industrial Waste Resource Guideline - Soil Hazard Categorisation and Management

Industrial Waste Management Guidelines IWRG701 EPA Victoria (2009) Sampling and analysis of waters, waste-waters, soils and wastes;

5.1 Soil Component 5.1.1 Field Protocols Standards Australia (2005) AS4482.1 “Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil, Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds” provides guidance for the collection of sufficient and reliable data for potentially contaminated sites. In addition, the NEPM requires the development of site specific data quality objectives (DQO’s). The DQO’s applied during the ESA are provided in Appendix M. The following table provides field protocols employed during the ESA.

Work Performed Description

Initial planning:

The scope of works was developed to assess the contamination status of the site, taking into consideration all data quality objectives stated in the NEPM (2013) and AS4482.1 (2005) and the appointed Environmental Auditor (Contaminated Land).

Boreholes:

Soil boreholes (BH) were established at selected accessible sample points across the site using hand auger equipment with split spoon sampling. Boreholes were completed via the sequential backfilling of spoil in the same order in which soils were encountered.

Field screening:

Headspace recordings of duplicate sub-samples were collected from a calibrated photo-ionisation detector (PID) to qualitatively assess the presence of volatile organic compounds. Recorded PID readings are presented in individual borehole logsheets presented in Appendix N. The field equipment certificates are presented in Appendix O.

Decontamination: Prior to the collection of each soil sample, sampling equipment was decontaminated (or latex glove replaced) in accordance with Section 7.5 of AS4482.1 (2005).

Handling and containment:

Samples were collected in clean laboratory supplied 250 mL glass sample jars. The sample jars were appropriately sealed and labelled for transport and storage.

of 282


Page 16

Work Performed Description

Sample preservation and storage:

Samples were placed into an esky away from sources of heat and light and placed on ice prior to transport to a NATA registered laboratory. The primary laboratory for soil samples was Eurofins-MGT and the secondary laboratory was ALS.

Chain of custody: Prior to submission for laboratory analysis, a chain of custody form was completed to demonstrate that the samples were properly received, documented, processed and analysed within specified holding times.

5.1.2 Site Investigations

Five ‘systematic’ soil boreholes (BH01-BH05) were established in accessible areas of the site, meeting the minimum sample density requirements of AS4482.1. Figure 2 presents the soil sample locations. Appendix N presents the relevant logsheets completed during the field works. Appendix P presents the Site Photographs. Samples of near-surface fill and underlying natural soils were collected from each borehole to a maximum depth of 1.1 metres, penetrating at least 0.5 metres into undisturbed natural soils. At borehole locations BH02 and BH03 near the southern boundary, an earthen sewer line was intersected which prevented natural undisturbed soils to be sampled. No odours or staining or asbestos containing materials were observed in all five boreholes established to a maximum depth of 1.1 metres.

5.1.3 Laboratory Analysis

All five near surface fill samples were analysed for a metal screen (comprising 17 metals) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), two of which were also selected from a comprehensive suite of analytes including 17 metals, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (MAHs), PAHs, volatile halogenated compounds (VHCs), cyanide, fluoride, pH, sulphate, phenols (halogenated), phenols (non-halogenated), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). A representative sample of near-surface soil and a natural clay sample were submitted for sulphate, pH and chloride along with a NEPM 2013 Screen for Soil Classification including % Fe, cation exchange capacity, pH (CaCl2), total organic carbon and % clay content. One representative fill sample underwent analysis for VHCs. The sample of fill collected adjacent to the sewer line was also analysed for nitrate. Australian Standard Leachate Procedure (ASLP) was carried out on all near-surface samples for PAHs and zinc, four samples for lead and one sample for cadmium. Vertical delineation analysis was also carried out on all near-surface samples for PAHs and zinc, four for lead and one for cadmium. Quality control soil samples collected during the assessment underwent analysis for PAHs.

of 282


Page 17

5.2 Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Quality control procedures were employed as part of the quality assurance program undertaken during the ESA. Such procedures included the collection and assessment of quality control soil samples, an assessment of intra and inter laboratory sample handling and analyses. 5.2.1 Blind Replicates Details of the blind replicate samples collected during the assessment works are presented below:

No. Recommended Samples1

No. Blind Replicate Samples Collected & Analysed Compliance

Achieved

1 every 20 samples analysed

1 from 12 primary soil samples analysed.

Yes

1 - As per AS4482.1 (2005) 5.2.2 Split Samples Details of the split samples collected during the assessment works are presented below:

No. Recommended Samples1

No. Split Samples Collected & Analysed Compliance

Achieved

1 every 20 samples analysed

1 from 12 primary soil samples analysed.

Yes

1 - As per AS4482.1 (2005) 5.2.3 Rinsate Blanks Details of the rinsate blank samples collected during the assessment works are presented below: No. Recommended Samples1

No. Rinsate Blank Samples Collected & Analysed Compliance

Achieved

1 per day for each piece of equipment used

One from the one day of soil sampling.

Yes

1 - As per AS4482.1 (2005) 5.2.4 Trip Blanks Details of the trip blank samples collected during the assessment works are presented below: No. Recommended Samples1

No. Trip Blank Samples Collected & Analysed Compliance

Achieved

1 per day for each batch sent to laboratory

One from the single batch sent to the laboratory

Yes

1 - As per AS4482.1 (2005)

of 282


Page 18

5.2.5 Quality Control Data Assessment Quality control data was assessed by calculating the relative percentage differences (RPDs) between data entries using the following equation:

RPD = Result 1 – Result 2 x 100 Mean result

An RDP value of up to 50% is considered acceptable. Higher RPD values can be expected for heterogenous samples (i.e. fill material) and low level analytes. Where primary or secondary samples reported concentrations below the detection limit, where necessary, 50% of the detection limit was applied to enable RPD calculations to be completed. Internal quality control conducted by each laboratory included duplicate and blank sample analyses, along with spike samples (to assess analyte recovery).

of 282


Page 19

6 RESULTS OF SITE ASSESSMENT

6.1 Soil Component 6.1.1 Site Geology Geological mapping indicates that the site is underlain by Quaternary Aged Newer Volcanics basalt, with the upper confines of which comprising clay and highly weathered basalt. Soils encountered during the investigations correlated with the geological map indications. Appendix P presents photographs taken during the investigation which identify typical soil stratigraphy encountered at the site. The general geological profile encountered at site is summarised below.

Depth (m) Description

0.0 – 0.5

FILL: dark grey sand, organic matter, occasional silt. The fill encountered in the north eastern garden bed contained glass, slate and crushed rock Disturbed brown clay is present adjacent to the earthen sewer line located along the sites southern boundary to a depth of at least a metre.

0.5 – 1.1 CLAY: firm, brown, moist of medium plasticity.

Although asbestos containing materials had been identified on near-by audit sites, there was no asbestos containing materials encountered at all five boreholes, nor in other areas of exposed soil. There were no stains or odours encountered in all five boreholes, coinciding with the absence of detectable readings from field PID screening. 6.1.2 Interpretation of Analytical Laboratory Results Tables 1 and 2 presented at the rear of the document (following Figures), provide the results of laboratory analysis for soil samples collected during the ESA. Results tables are best viewed in A3 format due to the default assembly of ESdat data output. The relevant Ecological Investigation Level (EIL) calculation sheets are presented in Appendix Q. The NATA certified analytical reports and corresponding chain of custody forms are presented in Appendix R. During the ESA results of soil sample analysis identified a number of metals (cadmium, lead, tin and zinc), Total PAHs and benzo(a)pyrene in fill material above the adopted ecological and/or health based criteria. There were no vapour intrusion exceedances. A summary of the analytes which exceeded the adopted criteria during the ESA is provided overleaf.

of 282


Page 20

Contaminant

Current Reported

Concentration Range (mg/kg)

Adopted Beneficial Use Criteria / Exceeding Samples

NEPM 2013 EIL / ESL

NEPM 2013 Residential A

NEPM 2013 Residential B

Cadmium: <0.4 – 1.7 1.4 20 150

BH01/0.05 - -

Lead: 6.9 – 1,000 1100 300 1200

- BH01/0.05, BH03/0.1, BH4/0.05 & BH5/0.05

-

Tin: <10 - 86 5 47,000 -

BH01/0.05, BH03/0.1, BH4/0.05 & BH5/0.05

- -

Zinc: 9.5 – 1,700 810 7,400 60,000

BH01/0.05, BH03/0.1, BH4/0.05 & BH5/0.05

- -

Total PAHs: <0.5 – 130

40 300 400 BH01/0.05 (+BR1 & SPLIT),

BH01/0.2, BH02/0.05 & BH03/0.1

- -

Carcinogenic PAHs as B(a)P TEQ(1):

<0.5 – 18.51

0.7 3 4

BH01/0.05 (+BR1 & SPLIT),BH01/0.2, BH02/0.05, BH02/0.9, BH03/0.1,

BH03/0.35, BH04/0.05 & BH05/0.05

BH01/0.05 (+BR1 & SPLIT), BH01/0.2,

BH02/0.05, BH02/0.9, BH03/0.1, BH03/0.35,

BH04/0.05 & BH05/0.05

BH01/0.05 (+BR1 & SPLIT), BH01/0.2,

BH02/0.05, BH03/0.1, BH04/0.05 & BH05/0.05

(1) TEQ – Total Equivalence Quotient used to associate other PAHs carcinogenic potential with

that of benzo (a) pyrene. Concentrations of lead, tin, zinc, Total PAHs and benzo(a)pyrene exceeded the Vic EPA maximum Fill Material Threshold for offsite management. Concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in four fill samples also exceeded the Vic EPA maximum Category C Threshold for off-site management. All elutriation results returned concentrations of all analysed parameters below the Vic EPA IWRG621 maximum Category C Threshold. Results of samples of representative analysis of fill reported near neutral pH levels in the range of 6.8 – 7.2. A representative clay sample also reported a near neutral pH level of 7.7.

6.2 Quality Assurance / Quality Control 6.2.1 Discussion - Soil QC Results Separate quality control tables are presented at the rear of this document (following Soil Results Tables) which provide details of a count of quality control samples, field duplicates and field blanks collected during the ESA. The NATA certified analytical reports and chain of custody forms are presented in Appendix R. A summary of the calculated RPDs for blind replicate and split samples are presented overleaf.

of 282


Page 21

Quality Control Sample Type Calculated RPDs (%)

Comments

Blind replicate sample BR1-20.01.16 (BH01/0.05):

0.0 - 35

All reported within acceptable limits.

Split sample BH01/0.05 (SPLIT):

0.0 - 50

All reported within acceptable limits.

Results of the rinsate blank and trip blank samples reported levels below the laboratory limit of reporting during each of the five soil sampling events. A summary of the analytical laboratory internal soil quality duplicate and spike sample results reported is presented below.

Quality Control Sample Type

Calculated RPDs Duplicates /

% Recovery for spikes

Comments

(Lab Reports 480951, 482203, EM1517636)

Duplicate samples: <1 – 96

Two internal duplicate samples exceeded the acceptable limits in Report 480951 for dieldrin and cadmium. Ten PAH compounds also exceeded the acceptable limits in Report 482203. However, the interpretation had not been affected due to the low levels reported being below the adopted criteria. In addition, passed Eurofins / MGT's Acceptance Criteria as stipulated in SOP 05.

Spiked samples: 71 – 128 Reported within acceptable limits

All analytical laboratory method blank samples were reported below the detection limit. Based on the quality control sample analyses, where elevated RPDs were identified, due consideration has been given to these results in their interpretation. Sample analysis was undertaken within the specified holding times and where no analytical limitations were applied, all detection limits were reported at lower concentrations than the adopted criteria. A detailed review of the quality assurance / quality control program undertaken during the ESA verifies that the interpreted soil data set can be relied upon to satisfy the objectives of the assessment.

of 282


Page 22

7 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT

Based on the raised contaminants of concern identified at the site, Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd was contracted to carry out a Human Health Risk Appraisal (HHRA). The “Risk Appraisal – 25 John Street, Clifton Hill” report (February 2016) is presented in Appendix S. The purpose of HHRA was to: To conduct an on-site risk appraisal to quantify potential risks to human health associated

with the presence of contamination that remains beneath the site, based on the proposed development plans.

On the basis of the appraisal, identify if any additional risk management measures may be required.

The review incorporated the following work elements: Screening level risk assessment. Detailed assessment of contaminants of concern [lead and Carcinogenic PAHs (BaP) TEQs]. Summary of exposure parameters adopted. Summary of risk. The findings of the HHRA associated with the identified contaminants of concern are provided below: Lead: Although it was not possible to do a site specific risk assessment for lead due to

limitations in the international literature regarding the toxicology of lead and recommendations for acceptable exposure levels, a conclusion could still be drawn that soil management measures were required to minimise potential exposure.

PAHs: Based on the proposed use of the site for ongoing low density residential purposes, no unacceptable risks were identified to human health due to the presence of carcinogenic PAHs. Accordingly, there are no requirements to undertake any risk management measures on the site in relation to carcinogenic PAHs.

Based on the findings of the HHRA, although a management plan was not considered necessary, the following recommendations were provided “Given the concentrations of lead reported, it is recommended that a layer of clean fill (0.1-0.2 metres deep) is laid over existing surface soils in the front yard and those areas in the back yard where accessible soils will remain is sufficient to limit exposure for residents. Applying such a layer will also limit exposure to other contaminants in the soil”.

of 282


Page 23

8 DISCUSSION

8.1 Soil Component 8.1.1 Appraisal of Site Contamination on Beneficial Uses of Land The Land SEPP nominates the following beneficial uses of the land to be protected: Maintenance of ecosystems (in this case, ‘highly modified’ ecosystems); Human health; Buildings and structures; Aesthetics, and Production of food, flora and fibre. Based on the results of soil sample analysis conducted and in accordance with the Land SEPP, an appraisal of the likely impact to the beneficial uses of the land is presented below.

Beneficial Use Comments

Maintenance of Highly Modified Ecosystems:

Results of soil sample analysis identified metals (cadmium, tin and zinc), Total PAHs and benzo(a)pyrene in fill material samples above the adopted “Maintenance of Ecosystems” criteria. The proposed rear extension increases the size of the existing building footprint, further reducing access to soils at the site. In addition, paving is to be applied in open areas along with the introduction of 100 – 200 mm of top soil in areas where soil would remain accessible.

Human Health:

Results of soil sample analysis identified concentrations of lead and carcinogenic PAHs as B(a)P TEQ in fill material samples above the adopted “Standard-Density Residential” land use criteria with concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs as B(a)P TEQ also exceeding the adopted “High-Density Residential” land use criteria. A site specific Human Health Risk Appraisal (HHRA) was carried out on the identified contaminants of concern, as present in Section 7 of this report. The HHRA found that:

“Given the concentrations of lead reported, it is recommended that a layer of clean fill (0.1-0.2 metres deep) is laid over existing surface soils in the front yard and those areas in the back yard where accessible soils will remain is sufficient to limit exposure for residents. Applying such a layer will also limit exposure to other contaminants in the soil”.

In addition to the proposed extension works and outdoor paving, in accordance with the recommendations of the HHRA, 100 – 200 mm of top soil is to be applied across areas where soil would remain accessible.

Precluded

Not Precluded - ‘Subject to adherence to Statement Conditions’

of 282


Page 24

Beneficial Use Comments

Buildings and Structures:

Results of samples of representative analysis of fill reported near neutral pH levels in the range of 6.8 – 7.2. A representative clay sample also reported a near neutral pH level of 7.7. A representative sample of fill at the site reported a concentration of sulphate of 20 mg/kg. A representative sample of underlying clay at the site reported a concentration of sulphate of <10 mg/kg. No on-going soil management would be required for soils with pH levels above 6.5, and sulphate levels below 2,000 mg/kg.

Aesthetics:

Site filling material encountered in the north eastern corner of the site (BH01) was identified to contain glass, slate and crushed rock. The proposed rear extension increases the size of the existing building footprint, further reducing access to soils at the site. In addition, paving is to be applied in open areas along with the introduction of 100 – 200 mm of top soil in areas where soil would remain accessible.

Production of Food, Flora and Fibre:

Results of soil sample analysis identified metals (cadmium, tin and zinc), Total PAHs and benzo(a)pyrene in fill material samples above the adopted “Maintenance of Ecosystems” criteria. Consideration is to be given to unrestricted use including the production of food, flora and fibre, applying New Zealand Food Authority, Food Standards Code. Accordingly, the existing near-surface soils would restrict the use for the production of food, flora and fibre. The proposed rear extension increases the size of the existing building footprint, further reducing access to soils at the site. In addition, paving is to be applied in open areas along with the introduction of 100 – 200 mm of top soil in areas where soil would remain accessible. In addition, the findings of the HHRA also identified that the contamination (i.e. lead and PAHs) would not affect this beneficial use as the contaminants are not taken up by plants through root systems and into plant shoots.

Not Precluded

Not Precluded - ‘Subject to adherence to Statement Conditions’

Not Precluded

of 282


Page 25

8.2 Groundwater Component 8.2.1 Protected Beneficial Uses of Groundwater Although an intrusive groundwater investigation was not conducted at the subject site, given the presence of available groundwater data provided from the completed Statutory Environmental Audit site behind the subject site (at No. 2 Spensley Street), a desktop appraisal of sites beneficial uses of groundwater could still be undertaken. Total dissolved solids concentrations reported at the adjacent site was 3,200 mg/L. Accordingly, groundwater falls within Segment B of the Groundwater SEPP. Protected beneficial uses under Segment B include: Maintenance of ecosystems; Potable mineral water supply; Agricultural parks and gardens; Stock watering; Industrial water use; Primary contact recreation; and Buildings and structures. Although only the Victorian EPA can determine the relevance of each beneficial use, a summary of the likelihood of groundwater beneficial uses being realised (applying Segment B) is presented below.

Beneficial Use On-Site(1) Off-Site(1)

Maintenance of Ecosystems

(‘PROTECTED’)

An aquatic surface water ecosystem not on-site.

The closest surface water body is Merri Creek, located approximately 340 metres to the north of the subject site. The Yarra River is located approximately one kilometre to the south east. Concentrations of copper, zinc, cyanide, ammonia and nitrate were reported to exceed criteria adopted for the protection of this beneficial use at the adjacent land parcel (No. 2 Spensley Street). Based on background investigations and results of soil sample analyses (including vertical delineation and low elutriable fractions of metals), the site is not considered the source of pollution.

Unlikely Existing

of 282


Page 26


Potable Water (Acceptable)

(‘NOT PROTECTED’)

The on-going use of the site for standard residential living is not expected to utilise groundwater for this use as a high quality low cost reticulated water supply available on-site.

The State Groundwater Database search did not identify any registered bores within a 2km radius of the site that utilise groundwater for this beneficial use. Concentrations of ammonia and nitrate were reported to exceed criteria adopted for the protection of this beneficial use at the adjacent land parcel (No. 2 Spensley Street). Based on background investigations and results of soil sample analyses, the site is not considered the source of pollution. Land use in the area is mixed with residential and commercial uses which most likely utilise the readily available, high quality, low cost reticulated water supply.

Mineral Water

(‘PROTECTED’)

Not in a recognised mineral water supply zone.

Not in a recognised mineral water supply zone.

Agriculture, Parks

and Gardens

(‘PROTECTED’)

The on-going use of the site for standard residential living is not expected to utilise groundwater for this use as a high quality low cost reticulated water supply available on-site

Although Mayors Park, Darling Gardens and Coulson Reserve are located in close proximity to the site, a high quality low cost reticulated water supply is available in this locality. The State Groundwater Database search did not identify any registered bores within a 2km radius of the site that utilise groundwater for this beneficial use. Concentration of all analytes returned concentrations below criteria adopted for the protection of this beneficial use. Groundwater is unlikely to provide sufficient yield for this use off-site.

Unlikely Unlikely

Unlikely Unlikely

Unlikely Unlikely

of 282


Page 27


Stock Watering

(‘PROTECTED’)

Not likely given the Sites’ locality in an urban setting. The on-going use of the site for standard residential living is not expected to utilise groundwater for this use as a high quality low cost reticulated water supply available on-site.

The State Groundwater Database search did not identify any registered bores within a 2km radius of the site that utilise groundwater for this beneficial use. Concentrations of nitrate were reported to exceed criteria adopted for the protection of this beneficial use at the adjacent land parcel (No. 2 Spensley Street). Based on background investigations and results of soil sample analyses, the site is not considered the source of pollution. Not likely given the urban setting.

Industrial Use

(‘PROTECTED’)

The on-going use of the site for standard residential living is not expected to utilise groundwater for this use as a high quality low cost reticulated water supply available on-site A high quality low cost reticulated water supply available on-site.

Land use in the area is primarily which most likely utilise the readily available, high quality, low cost reticulated water supply. The State Groundwater Database search did not identify any registered bores within a 2km radius of the site that utilise groundwater for this beneficial use. Groundwater is unlikely to provide sufficient yield for this use off-site.

Primary Contact Recreation

(‘PROTECTED’)

The on-going use of the site for standard residential living is not expected to utilise groundwater for this use as a high quality low cost reticulated water supply available on-site (i.e. filling pools and spas).

The closest surface water body is Merri Creek, located approximately 340 metres to the north of the subject site. The Yarra River is located approximately one kilometre to the south east. Although not known as a ‘swimming’ zones, the water bodies are used by recreation watercraft (i.e. row boats).

Unlikely Unlikely

Unlikely Unlikely

Unlikely Existing

of 282


Page 28


Swimming pools and spas are likely to be filled using the high quality low cost reticulated water supply. Concentrations of ammonia and nitrate were reported to exceed criteria adopted for the protection of this beneficial use at the adjacent land parcel (No. 2 Spensley Street). Based on background investigations and results of soil sample analyses, the site is not considered the source of pollution.

Buildings and Structures

(‘PROTECTED’)

Groundwater is at depths greater than that which would be expected to come in contact with any proposed on-site development.

Groundwater is at depths greater than that which would be expected to come in contact with any proposed off-site development.

(1) Shading applied to ‘Existing’ beneficial uses In summary, there are no existing on-site beneficial uses of groundwater considered likely, although the existing off-site beneficial uses of ‘Maintenance of Ecosystems’ and ‘Primary Contact Recreation’ are likely to be realised. 8.2.2 Clean Up to the Extent Practicable With reference to Victorian Environment Protection Authority (2015), Publication 759.3 - Environmental Auditor (Contaminated Land) Guidelines for the Issue of Certificates and Statements of Environmental Audit, the following key points are addressed: Based on a review of groundwater data generated at nearby audit sites (i.e. raised levels of

nitrate, ammonia and cyanide) and the inferred direction of groundwater flow, the groundwater is likely to be polluted. Based on background investigations and results of soil sample analyses, the site is not considered a source of local groundwater pollution.

An Auditor determined Clean Up to the Extent Practicable (CUTEP) process will be necessary and the site be designated a GQRUZ which would require appropriate groundwater testing prior to any future use.


The beneficial uses of the land are not impacted by polluted groundwater.

As no clean-up of groundwater is considered necessary there is no requirement to access to the site to clean up polluted groundwater.

Unlikely Unlikely

of 282


Page 29

9 CONCLUSIONS

9.1 Site History & Potential Site Contamination Background investigations identified that the existing terrace house has been occupied by several land owners since the turn of the twentieth century with very little (if any) development works. Potential sources of on-site contamination were identified to include imported fill and building materials. Completed audit sites in the area commonly reported raised levels of metals and PAHs in site filling material. During the Statutory Environmental Audit of at the adjacent land parcel (No. 2 Spensley Street), asbestos containing materials were identified in site filling material. No asbestos containing materials were identified in site filling material encountered at the subject site. Off-site historical sources of potential contamination were identified to include a fuel merchant, steel equipment manufacturers and timbers yards.

9.2 Soil Assessment During the ESA results of soil sample analysis identified a number of metals (cadmium, lead, tin and zinc), Total PAHs and benzo(a)pyrene in fill material above the adopted ecological and/or health based criteria. There were no vapour intrusion exceedances. The reported concentrations of lead and carcinogenic PAHs as B(a)P TEQ in fill material samples were reported above the adopted “Standard-Density Residential” land use criteria with concentrations of Carcinogenic PAHs as B(a)P TEQ also exceeding the adopted “High-Density Residential” land use criteria. Consequently, a site specific Human Health Risk Appraisal (HHRA) was carried out on the identified contaminants of concern. The proposed rear extension increases the size of the existing building footprint, further reducing access to soils at the site. In addition, paving is to be applied in open areas along with the introduction of 100 – 200 mm of top soil in areas where soil would remain accessible.

9.3 Human Health Risk Appraisal Based on the raised contaminants of concern identified at the site, Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd completed at Human Health Risk Appraisal to quantify potential risks to human health associated with the presence of contamination that remains beneath the site and identify if any additional risk management measures may be required. Based on the findings of the HHRA, it was determined that “Given the concentrations of lead reported, it is recommended that a layer of clean fill (0.1-0.2 metres deep) is laid over existing surface soils in the front yard and those areas in the back yard where accessible soils will remain is sufficient to limit exposure for residents. Applying such a layer will also limit exposure to other contaminants in the soil”. In addition to the proposed extension works and outdoor paving, in accordance with the recommendations of the HHRA, 100 – 200 mm of top soil is to be applied across areas where soil would remain accessible.

of 282


Page 30

9.4 Groundwater Assessment A desktop appraisal of available groundwater information identified that groundwater was generally intersected groundwater at approximately 10.0 metres below ground level in Newer Volcanic Basalt. The inferred direction of local groundwater flow was to the south east. A review of groundwater chemical data generated at near-by completed audit sites indicted elevated concentrations of several metals, ammonia, nitrate and cyanide which were considered to be either background conditions or representative of regional groundwater quality. Given the local groundwater conditions, the groundwater is considered to be polluted (i.e. raised nitrate, ammonia and cyanide). Accordingly, an Auditor determined CUTEP process will be necessary and the site be designated a GQRUZ, which would require appropriate groundwater testing prior to any future use. Based on background investigations and results of soil sample analyses, the subject site is not considered a source of local groundwater pollution.


The beneficial uses of the land are not impacted by polluted groundwater.

As no clean-up of groundwater is considered necessary, there is no requirement to access to the site to clean up polluted groundwater.

9.5 Conclusion

Based on the findings of the background investigations and the intrusive soil investigation works, the on-going use of the site for standard residential proposes, which will extend the existing building footprint and reduce access to soils via application of outdoor paving and 100-200 mm top soil, would not be precluded.

of 282


Page 31

10 LIMITATIONS

Works conducted for the assessment were done in accordance with the agreed scope of works between Environmental Assessment Services Pty Ltd and Jenny Yuen. The scope was designed in consultation with the appointed Environmental Auditor (Contaminated Land) and current guidelines and practices. Site assessment works were undertaken at discrete sample points. Accordingly, data generated does not characterise the entire Site. This report shall not be used for purposes other than those agreed in the scope of works and distribution of the report shall be presented in full with permission.

11 REFERENCES

Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council/National Health and Medical Research Council (1992) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) (2002) Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health. Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC Care) (2011) Health Screening Levels for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil and Groundwater (Health Screening Levels for Vapour Intrusion) National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) (2013), National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure April 2013. Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (2013) Soil Remediation Circular. New South Wales Environmental Protection Authority (1994), Guidelines for Assessing Service Station Site – document replaced by NSW EPA 2014 Technical Note: Investigation of Service Station Sites. Standards Australia (2005) AS4482.1 Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil, Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds. Standards Australia. (1999) AS 4482.2 Guide to the Sampling and Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Soil. Part 2: Volatile Substances. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2015) Region 9 Regional Screening Levels. Victorian Government (1997). State Environment Protection Policy (Groundwaters of Victoria) No S160, 1997. Victorian EPA Publication (2009), Publication 1270 - Assessment of the Potential for Methane Gas Movement from Victorian Landfills.

of 282


Page 32

Victorian Environment Protection Authority (2014), Publication 840.1 – The Clean Up and Management of Polluted Groundwater. Victorian Environment Protection Authority (2015), Publication 759.3 - Environmental Auditor (Contaminated Land) Guidelines for the Issue of Certificates and Statements of Environmental Audit. Victorian Environment Protection Authority (2009), Industrial Waste Management Guidelines IWRG701 - Sampling and analysis of waters, waste-waters, soils and waste. Victorian Environment Protection Authority (2000), Publication 669 - Groundwater Sampling Guidelines. The Victorian EPA 2009 Publication IWRG621 “Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines - Soil Hazard Characterisation and Management”.

of 282

FIGURES

of 282

Figure 1

Site Locality Plan

of 282

of 282

Figure 2

Site Investigation Plan

of 282

of 282

TABLES

of 282

Table 1

Soil Analytical Results

(and accompanying Quality Control Tables)

of 282

TABLE 1 - SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Chlorin

ated

hyd

rocarbon

s EP

AVic

Other chlorinated

hyd

rocarbon

s EPA

Vic

1,1,1,2‐tetrachloroe

than

e

1,1,1‐trichloroe

than

e


than

e

1,1,2‐trichloroe

than

e

1,1‐dichloroetha

ne

1,1‐dichloroethe

ne

1,2,3‐trichlorop

ropa

ne

1,2‐dichloroetha

ne

1,2‐dichloroprop

ane

1,3‐dichloroprop

ane

Brom

ochlorom

etha

ne

Brom

odichlorom

etha

ne

Brom

oform

Carbon

tetrachloride

Chlorodibrom

ometha

ne

Chloroetha

ne

Chloroform

Chlorometha

ne

cis‐1,2‐dichloroethe

ne

cis‐1,3‐dichloroprop

ene

Dibromom

etha

ne

Dichlorom

etha

ne

Hexachlorob

utad

iene

Trichloroe

then

e

Tetrachloroe

then

e

tran

s‐1,2‐dichloroethe

ne

tran

s‐1,3‐dichloroprop

ene

Viny

l chloride

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

EQL 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.2 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

NEPM 2013 EIL Urban residential and public open space ‐ FILL

NEPM 2013 EIL Urban residential and public open space ‐ NATURAL SOIL

NEPM 2013 Table 1B(6) ESLs for Urban Res, Fine Soil

0‐2m

NEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Res A Soil

NEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits in Res / Parkland

NEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Res B Soil

NEPM 2013 Table 1A(3) Res A/B Soil HSL for Vapour Intrusion

0‐1m

IWRG621 Fill 1IWRG621 Cat C 10 2.8 1.2IWRG621 Cat B 50 11 4.8

Field_ID Sampled_Date Matrix_DescriptionBH01/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) <1.1 <0.85 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH01/0.05 (SPLIT) 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) <0.7 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

BH03/0.35 25/11/2015 Disturbed CLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) <1.1 <0.85 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Statistical SummaryNumber of Results 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3

Number of Detects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Minimum Concentration <0.7 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Minimum Detect ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Maximum Concentration <1.1 <0.85 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Maximum Detect ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Average Concentration 0.48 0.39 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

Median Concentration 0.55 0.425 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.1 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

Standard Deviation 0.12 0.058 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Number of Guideline Exceedances 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Number of Guideline Exceedances(Detects Only) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NOTE: Shading applied to the higher criteria value

a ‐ ANZECC B Environmental Investigation Level (1992)b ‐ Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines ‐ Agricultural Use (2013)c ‐ USEPA Region 3,6,9 Residential (2015)d ‐ Netherlands Soil Remediation Circular ‐ Intervention Value (2013)

Exceeds adopted EIL

Exceeds adopted HIL ‐Standard Residential Exceeds adopted HIL ‐High Density Residential Exceeds adopted HSL ‐ Vapour Intrusion

High Density Residential

Chlorinated Hydrocarbons

Page 1

of 282


EQL




0‐2m





0‐1m

IWRG621 FillIWRG621 Cat CIWRG621 Cat B

Field_ID Sampled_Date Matrix_DescriptionBH01/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.05 (SPLIT) 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.35 25/11/2015 Disturbed CLAY

BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY

Statistical SummaryNumber of Results

Number of Detects

Minimum Concentration

Minimum Detect

Maximum Concentration

Maximum Detect

Average Concentration

Median Concentration

Standard Deviation

Number of Guideline Exceedances

Number of Guideline Exceedances(Detects Only)



Exceeds adopted EIL



Herbicides

1,2,4‐trichlorob

enzene

1,2‐dichlorobe

nzen

e

1,3‐dichlorobe

nzen

e

1,4‐dichlorobe

nzen

e

4‐chlorotoluen

e

Brom

oben

zene

Chlorobe

nzen

e

Hexachlorob

enzene

1,2‐dibrom

oethan

e

Brom

ometha

ne

Dichlorod

ifluo

rometha

ne

Iodo

metha

ne

Trichlorofluorom

etha

ne

2,4,5‐trichlorop

heno

l

2,4,6‐trichlorop

heno

l

2,4‐dichloroph

enol

2,6‐dichloroph

enol

2‐chloroph

enol

Pentachlorop

heno

l

tetrachlorop

heno

ls

Dinoseb

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.2 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 20

10 100

15 130

<0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <20

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <20

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

<0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <20

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

<0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <20


0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

0.1 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 10

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Halogenated Benzenes Halogenated Hydrocarbons Halogenated Phenols

Page 2

of 282


EQL




0‐2m





0‐1m



BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY


Number of Detects


Minimum Detect


Maximum Detect



Standard Deviation





Exceeds adopted EIL



Particle Size Lead

CEC

Iron (%

)

TOC

% Clay*

Cond

uctiv

ity (1

:5 aqu

eous extract)

Chlorid

e

Cyan

ide To

tal

Fluo

ride

Moisture

Moisture Co

nten

t (dried @ 103

°C)

Nitrate (as N)

pH (a

queo

us extract)

pH (Lab

)

Sulpha

te as S

Lead

Arsenic

Beryllium

Boron

Cadm

ium

Chromium (h

exavalen

t)

Chromium (III+

VI)

Coba

lt

Copp

er

Man

gane

se

Mercury

Molyb

denu

m

Nicke

l

Selenium

Silver

Tin

Vana

dium

Zinc

meq/100g % mg/kg % uS/cm mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % mg/kg pH_Units pH_Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.05 0.01 50 1 10 5 5 100 0.1 5 0.1 0.1 10 5 2 2 10 0.4 1 5 5 5 5 0.1 10 5 2 5 10 10 5

200b 2000b 1100 100 4a 2b 1.4b 0.4b 370 40b 230 500a 6.6b 5b 430 1b 20b 5b 130b 810

200b 2000b 1100 100 4a 2b 1.4b 0.4b 580 40b 220 500a 6.6b 5b 300 1b 20b 5b 130b 830

250 3100C 130,000C 300 100 60 4500 20 100 120,000 100 6000 3800 7 390C 400 200 390c 47000c 390c 7400

300 1200 500 90 40000 150 500 600 30000 14000 120 1200 1400 60000

50 450 300 20 3 1 100 1 40 60 10 10 50 2002500 10000 1500 500 100 500 5000 75 1000 3000 50 180 500 3500010000 40000 6000 2000 400 2000 20000 300 4000 12000 200 720 140000

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <5 170 ‐ 12 ‐ 6.8 ‐ ‐ 830 16 <2 <10 1.7 <1 34 6.6 91 370 0.3 <10 21 <2 <5 20 99 1700 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.7 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 11.8 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

23 2.3 1.5 30 81 27 ‐ ‐ ‐ 13 ‐ 14 ‐ 7.7 7 <10 16 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 30

39 2.6 6.8 7.5 110 22 ‐ ‐ ‐ 14 ‐ 7.2 6.8 20 120 8.8 <2 <10 <0.4 <1 ‐ 9.6 27 130 <0.1 <10 19 <2 <5 <10 74 500 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 11 ‐ 13 <5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 200

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 14 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 960 9.4 <2 <10 0.9 <1 ‐ 9.2 47 210 0.4 <10 25 <2 <5 11 55 1200 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 16 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 19 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 120

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <5 150 ‐ 7.9 ‐ 7.1 ‐ ‐ 1000 4.6 <2 <10 0.9 <1 69 11 61 360 0.5 <10 32 <2 <5 38 24 1100 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 11

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 830 8.3 <2 <10 0.6 <1 ‐ 6.8 46 170 0.2 <10 22 <2 <5 86 55 860 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 16 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.9 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9.5

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 12 1 4 2 2 9 5 5 5 6 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10

2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 12 0 4 2 1 9 5 0 0 4 0 2 5 5 5 4 0 5 0 0 4 5 10

23 2.3 1.5 7.5 81 22 <5 150 11.8 7.7 <5 6.8 6.8 <10 6.9 4.6 <2 <10 <0.4 <1 34 6.6 27 130 <0.1 <10 19 <2 <5 <10 24 9.5

23 2.3 1.5 7.5 81 22 ND 150 11.8 7.7 ND 6.8 6.8 20 6.9 4.6 ND ND 0.6 ND 34 6.6 27 130 0.2 ND 19 ND ND 11 24 9.5

39 2.6 6.8 30 110 27 <5 170 11.8 16 <5 7.7 7 20 1000 16 <2 <10 1.7 <1 69 11 91 370 0.5 <10 32 <2 <5 86 99 1700

39 2.6 6.8 30 110 27 ND 170 11.8 16 ND 7.7 7 20 1000 16 ND ND 1.7 ND 69 11 91 370 0.5 ND 32 ND ND 86 99 1700

13 7.2 421 9.4 1 5 0.75 0.5 8.6 54 248 0.29 5 24 1 2.5 32 61 573

31 2.45 4.15 18.75 95.5 24.5 2.5 160 11.8 13.75 2.5 7.15 6.9 12.5 120 8.8 1 5 0.75 0.5 51.5 9.2 47 210 0.3 5 22 1 2.5 20 55 350

3 0.37 464 4.1 0 0 0.56 0 1.9 24 111 0.17 0 5.1 0 0 33 28 606

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5

MetalsInorganics

Page 3

of 282


EQL




0‐2m





0‐1m



BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY


Number of Detects


Minimum Detect


Maximum Detect



Standard Deviation





Exceeds adopted EIL



4,4‐DDE

a‐BH

C

Aldrin

b‐BH

C

chlordan

e

d‐BH

C

DDD

DDT

Dieldrin

Endo

sulfa

n I

Endo

sulfa

n II

Endo

sulfa

n sulpha

te

Endrin

Endrin aldeh

yde

Endrin keton

e

g‐BH

C (Linda

ne)

Hep

tachlor

Hep

tachlor e

poxide

Metho

xychlor

Toxaph

ene

Organ

ochlorine pe

sticides EPA

Vic

Other organ

ochlorine pe

sticides EPA

Vic

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1

180

180

50 10 6 300 20

90 20 10 500 30

14 1.2 1016 4.8 50

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 0.535 <0.75

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.75

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 0.535 <0.75

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.06 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.535 ND

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.75


0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.05 0.025 0.025 0.0425 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.5 0.5175 0.375

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Organochlorine Pesticides OCP

Page 4

of 282


EQL




0‐2m





0‐1m



BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY


Number of Detects


Minimum Detect


Maximum Detect



Standard Deviation





Exceeds adopted EIL



PAH

Benzo(b+

j)fluoran

then

e

Benzo(a)py

rene

TEQ

(LOR)

Benzo(a)py

rene

TEQ

calc (Half)

Benzo(a)py

rene

TEQ

calc (Zero)

2,4‐dimethy

lphe

nol

2,4‐dinitrop

heno

l

2‐methy

lphe

nol

2‐nitrop

heno

l

3‐&4‐methy

lphe

nol

4,6‐Dinitro‐2‐methy

lphe

nol

4‐chloro‐3‐m

ethy

lphe

nol

4‐nitrop

heno

l

Acen

aphthe

ne

Acen

aphthy

lene

Anthracene

Benz(a)anthracen

e

Benzo(a) pyren

e

Benzo(g,h,i)p

erylen

e

Benzo(k)flu

oran

then

e

Chrysene

Diben

z(a,h)an

thracene

Carcinog

enic PAH

s as B(a)P TEQ

Fluo

ranthe

ne

Fluo

rene

Inde

no(1,2,3‐c,d)pyren

e

Nap

htha

lene

PAHs (Sum

of total)

Polycylic aromatic hyd

rocarbon

s EP

AVic

Phen

anthrene

Phen

ol

Phen

ols (non

‐halog

enated

) EPA

Vic

Phen

ols(ha

loge

nated) EPA

Vic

Pyrene

4,6‐Dinitro‐o‐cycloh

exyl phe

nol

Phen

ols (Total Halog

enated

)

Phen

ols (Total Non

Halog

enated

)

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5 0.2 1 0.4 5 1 5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 20 1 20

170 40d 3.5a

170 40d 3.5a

0.7

3 300 3000

4 400 45000

3

1 20 60 15 100 560 1020 400 2200 320

3.1 8.9 8.9 8.9 <0.5 <5 <0.2 <1 <0.4 <5 <1 <5 <0.5 0.7 0.9 3.6 6.4 3.7 3.1 3.7 1.1 8.894 7.2 <0.5 3.4 <0.5 48 45.75 3.4 <0.5 <57.2 <5.5 7.8 <20 <1 <20

4.7 7.4 7.4 7.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 1 1.2 4.1 4.9 2.8 4.1 3.7 0.9 7.415 7.3 <0.5 2.6 <0.5 48 43.85 4.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.3 ‐ ‐ ‐

5.6 7.4 7.4 7.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 0.8 1.5 4.1 5 3.6 2.5 3.6 0.8 7.392 8 <0.5 3 <0.5 49.8 44.95 3.8 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.5 ‐ ‐ ‐

5.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 1.1 1.5 4.4 5.5 3.7 3.8 3.9 1.1 8.356 8.1 <0.5 3.3 <0.5 54 49.25 5.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.8 ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.5 1.2 0.6 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <7.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐

8.5 16 16 16 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 2.8 4.7 11 11 5.4 8 9.2 2 16.42 22 1.9 5.2 1.2 130 119.7 17 ‐ ‐ ‐ 18 ‐ ‐ ‐

2 4 3.8 3.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 0.5 0.8 2.4 2.7 1.5 2 2 <0.5 3.775 4.5 <0.5 1.5 <0.5 26 25.2 2.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3.9 ‐ ‐ ‐

11 19 19 19 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 1.7 2 10 13 6 7.7 9.1 1.9 18.51 13 0.5 5.9 <0.5 100 91.4 7.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 13 ‐ ‐ ‐

1.9 4.1 3.8 3.6 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 0.5 2.5 2.8 1.3 1.8 2.1 <0.5 3.834 5.1 <0.5 1.3 <0.5 26 25.15 1.7 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.8 ‐ ‐ ‐

3.5 6.9 6.9 6.9 <0.5 <5 <0.2 <1 <0.4 <5 <1 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.9 4.6 3.1 3.9 3.2 0.9 6.863 3.9 <0.5 2.7 <0.5 35 32.25 1.9 <0.5 <57.2 <5.5 3.9 <20 <1 <20

<0.5 1.2 0.6 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <7.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐

4.6 7.2 7.2 7.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 0.5 3.3 4.8 3.3 3 3.3 1 7.246 5.6 <0.5 2.9 <0.5 40 36.2 2.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 5.4 ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.5 1.2 0.6 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <7.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐

13 13 13 13 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 2 2 2 13 2 2 2

10 13 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 9 10 10 10 10 10 8 10 10 2 10 1 10 10 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0

<0.5 1.2 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <0.2 <1 <0.4 <5 <1 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <7.5 <0.5 <0.5 <57.2 <5.5 <0.5 <20 <1 <20

1.9 1.2 0.6 3.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 0.5 2.4 2.7 1.3 1.8 2 0.8 3.775 3.9 0.5 1.3 1.2 26 25.15 1.7 ND ND ND 3.9 ND ND ND

11 19 19 19 <0.5 <5 <0.2 <1 <0.4 <5 <1 <5 <0.5 2.8 4.7 11 13 6 8 9.2 2 18.51 22 1.9 5.9 1.2 130 119.7 17 <0.5 <57.2 <5.5 18 <20 <1 <20

11 19 19 19 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.8 4.7 11 13 6 8 9.2 2 18.51 22 1.9 5.9 1.2 130 119.7 17 ND ND ND 18 ND ND ND

3.9 7.1 7 6.9 0.25 0.78 1.1 3.8 4.7 2.7 3.1 3.4 0.84 7 6.6 0.4 2.5 0.32 43 40 3.8 6

3.5 7.2 7.2 7.2 0.25 2.5 0.1 0.5 0.2 2.5 0.5 2.5 0.25 0.5 0.8 3.3 4.8 3.1 3 3.3 0.9 7.246 5.6 0.25 2.7 0.25 40 36.2 2.4 0.25 28.6 2.75 5.4 10 0.5 10

3.2 5.4 5.6 5.7 0 0.76 1.2 3.3 3.9 1.9 2.5 2.9 0.6 5.6 5.9 0.46 1.8 0.26 38 34 4.5 5.1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PAH/Phenols Phenolics

Page 5

of 282


EQL




0‐2m





0‐1m



BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY


Number of Detects


Minimum Detect


Maximum Detect



Standard Deviation





Exceeds adopted EIL



Arochlor 101

6

Arochlor 122

1

Arochlor 123

2

Arochlor 124

2

Arochlor 124

8

Arochlor 125

4

Arochlor 126

0

PCBs (S

um of total)

Methy

l Ethyl Keton

e

4‐Methy

l‐2‐pen

tano

ne

Aceton

e

Allyl chloride

Carbon

disulfid

e

C10‐C1

6

C16‐C3

4

C34‐C4

0

F2‐NAP

HTH

ALEN

E

C6 ‐ C9

C10 ‐ C

14

C15 ‐ C

28

C29‐C3

6

+C10

‐ C3

6 (Sum

of total)

C6‐C10

Benzen

e

Ethy

lben

zene

Toluen

e

Xylene

(m & p)

Xylene

(o)

Xylene

Total

C6‐C10

less BTE

X (F1)

Mon

ocylic aromatic hyd

rocarbon

s EPA

Vic

1,2,4‐trim

ethy

lben

zene

1,3,5‐trim

ethy

lben

zene

Isop

ropy

lben

zene

Styren

e

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 50 100 100 50 20 20 50 50 50 20 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 20 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

1b

1b

1300 5600 120 65 105 180

125 45

1 1.2c 5.8c 490C 65c

1000 2500 10000 700

1

110 0.5 55 160 40 45

2 100 1000 1 70 650 10000 4 700 2600 40000 16 240

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <50 280 <100 <50 <20 <20 200 130 330 <20 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.3 <20 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <50 190 <100 <50 <20 <20 140 110 250 <20 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.3 <20 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <50 190 <100 <50 <20 <20 140 110 250 <20 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.3 <20 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 190 ND ND ND ND 140 110 250 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <50 280 <100 <50 <20 <20 200 130 330 <20 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.3 <20 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05


0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 25 235 50 25 10 10 170 120 290 10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.15 10 0.325 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MAHBTEXPolychlorinated Biphenyls Solvents TPH

Page 6

of 282

ContentsCount of Samples

Matrix Type SOIL WATERFirst Sample Date 25/11/2015 25/11/2015Last Sample Date 25/11/2015 25/11/2015Sampling Period (days) 2 1Number of Samples Submitted 20 2Number of Non QA Samples Submitted 18 0Number of Field Blanks 0 0Number of Trip Blanks 0 1Number of Rinsates 0 1Number of Field Duplicates 1 0Number of Trip Spikes 0 0Number of Lab Duplicates 11 0Number of LCSs 5 1Number of CRMs 0 0Number of Method Blanks 6 1Number of Storage Blanks 0 0Number of Matrix Spikes 9 1Number of Matrix Spike Dupes 0 0

Page 1

of 282

Field Duplicates (SOIL) SDG 15101 15101 15101 Interlab_DField ID BH01/0.05 BR1-25.11.15 RPD BH01/0.05 BH01/0.05 (SPLIT) RPDSampled Date/Time 25/11/2015 25/11/2015 25/11/2015 25/11/2015

Chem_Group ChemName Units EQL

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (LOR) mg/kg 0.5 8.9 7.4 18 8.9 7.4 18 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (Half) mg/kg 0.5 8.9 7.4 18 8.9 7.4 18 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (Zero) mg/kg 0.5 8.9 7.4 18 8.9 7.4 18

PAH/Phenols Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0 <0.5 <0.5 0 Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 0.7 1.0 35 0.7 0.8 13 Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 0.9 1.2 29 0.9 1.5 50 Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 3.6 4.1 13 3.6 4.1 13 Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5 6.4 4.9 27 6.4 5.0 25 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 3.7 2.8 28 3.7 3.6 3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 3.1 4.1 28 3.1 2.5 21 Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 3.7 3.7 0 3.7 3.6 3 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 1.1 0.9 20 1.1 0.8 32 Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 7.2 7.3 1 7.2 8.0 11 Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0 <0.5 <0.5 0 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 3.4 2.6 27 3.4 3.0 13 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0 <0.5 <0.5 0 PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 48.0 48.0 0 48.0 49.8 4 Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 3.4 4.2 21 3.4 3.8 11 Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 7.8 6.3 21 7.8 7.5 4

*RPDs have only been considered where a concentration is greater than 1 times the EQL.

**High RPDs are in bold (Acceptable RPDs for each EQL multiplier range are: 80 (1-10 x EQL); 50 (10-30 x EQL); 30 ( > 30 x EQL) )

Filter: ALL

***Interlab Duplicates are matched on a per compound basis as methods vary between laboratories. Any methods in the row header relate to those used in the primary laboratory

Page 1

of 282

Field Blanks (WATER) SDG 15101 15101Field ID RB1-25.11.15 TB1-25.11.15Sampled_Date/Time 25/11/2015 25/11/2015Sample Type Rinsate Trip_B

Chem_Group ChemName Units EQLPAH Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene mg/l 0.001 <0.001 <0.001

PAH/Phenols Acenaphthene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Acenaphthylene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Anthracene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Benz(a)anthracene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Benzo(a) pyrene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Chrysene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Fluoranthene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Fluorene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Naphthalene µg/l 1 <1 <1 PAHs (Sum of total) µg/l 1 <1 <1 Phenanthrene µg/l 1 <1 <1 Pyrene µg/l 1 <1 <1

Filter: ALL

Page 1

of 282

Table 2

Soil ASLP Analytical Results

of 282

TABLE 2 - ASLP SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Inorganics Lead PAH

pH (Initia

l)

Lead

Cadm

ium

Zinc

Benzo(b+

j)fluoran

then

e

Acen

aphthe

ne

Acen

aphthy

lene

Anthracene

Benz(a)anthracen

e

Benzo(a) pyren

e

Benzo(g,h,i)p

erylen

e

Benzo(k)flu

oran

then

e

Chrysene

Diben

z(a,h)an

thracene

Fluo

ranthe

ne

Fluo

rene

Inde


e

Nap

htha

lene

PAHs (Sum

of total)

Phen

anthrene

Pyrene

pH_Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L

EQL 0.1 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.001 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

IWRG621 Cat C Leached 1 0.2 300 1

IWRG621 Cat B Leached 4 0.8 1200 4

Field_ID Sampled_Date‐Time Matrix_DescriptionBH01/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 8.6 0.1 <0.005 4.6 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 9.1 ‐ ‐ 2.4 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 9.2 0.12 ‐ 1.7 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 8.8 0.2 ‐ 2.1 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 8.9 0.15 ‐ 1.6 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Metals PAH/Phenols

Page 1

of 282

APPENDICIES

of 282

Appendix A

Proposed Development Plans

of 282

of 282

Appendix B

Planning Permit

of 282

of 282

Appendix C

Certificates of Title

of 282

VOLUME 08943 FOLIO 219 Security no : 124057567744T Produced 26/10/2015 11:57 am

LAND DESCRIPTION

Lot 4 on Plan of Subdivision 042861. PARENT TITLE Volume 05931 Folio 123 Created by instrument E467809 21/07/1972


Estate Fee Simple Joint Proprietors TERENCE YUEN JENNY YUEN both of 25 JOHN STREET CLIFTON HILL VIC 3068 AL663358M 05/02/2015


MORTGAGE AL663359K 05/02/2015 WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION Any encumbrances created by Section 98 Transfer of Land Act 1958 or Section 24 Subdivision Act 1988 and any other encumbrances shown or entered on the plan or imaged folio set out under DIAGRAM LOCATION below.

DIAGRAM LOCATION

SEE LP042861 FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND BOUNDARIES

ACTIVITY IN THE LAST 125 DAYS

NIL ------------------------END OF REGISTER SEARCH STATEMENT------------------------ Additional information: (not part of the Register Search Statement) Street Address: 25 JOHN STREET CLIFTON HILL VIC 3068 DOCUMENT END


REGISTER SEARCH STATEMENT (Title Search) Transfer of Land Act 1958

Page 1 of 1


of 282

Imaged Document Cover Sheet

The document following this cover sheet is an imaged document supplied by LANDATA®, Land Victoria.

Document Type plan

Document Identification LP042861

Number of Pages

(excluding this cover sheet)

1

Document Assembled 26/10/2015 12:01

Copyright and disclaimer notice:© State of Victoria. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process exceptin accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act and for the purposes of Section 32 of the Saleof Land Act 1962 or pursuant to a written agreement. The information is only valid at the time and inthe form obtained from the LANDATA® System. The State of Victoria accepts no responsibility forany subsequent release, publication or reproduction of the information.

The document is invalid if this cover sheet is removed or altered.

of 282

of 282

Produced 26/10/2015 12:16 PM

Volume 08943 Folio 219Folio Creation: Created as paper folio continued as computer folioParent title Volume 05931 Folio 123

THE IMAGE OF THE FOLIO CEASED TO BE THE DIAGRAM LOCATION ON 10/11/2005 03:18 PM

RECORD OF ALTS DEALINGS

Date Lodged for Date Recorded Dealing Imaged Dealing Type andRegistration on Register Details

RECORD OF VOTS DEALINGS

Date Lodged for Date Recorded Dealing ImagedRegistration on Register

29/10/2002 29/10/2002 AB660631Y Y

WITHDRAWAL OF CAVEAT CAVEAT W578692W REMOVED

29/10/2002 29/10/2002 AB660632W Y

DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE MORTGAGE(S) REMOVED W509000W

29/10/2002 29/10/2002 AB660633U Y

MORTGAGE OF LAND MORTGAGE AB660633U 29/10/2002 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED

13/01/2006 13/01/2006 AE117620L Y

DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE MORTGAGE(S) REMOVED AB660633U

13/01/2006 13/01/2006 AE117621J Y

TRANSFER OF LAND BY ENDORSEMENT FROM: KELLI-JANE GREEN PAUL KENNETH BARCLAY TO: KATE LOUISE RYAN RESULTING PROPRIETORSHIP: Estate Fee Simple Sole Proprietor KATE LOUISE RYAN of 25 JOHN STREET CLIFTON HILL VIC 3068 AE117621J 13/01/2006

13/01/2006 13/01/2006 AE117622G Y

MORTGAGE OF LAND MORTGAGE AE117622G 13/01/2006 COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA


HISTORICAL SEARCH STATEMENT Land Victoria Page 1 of 8


of 282

17/11/2014 17/11/2014 AL492700E (E) N

CAVEAT CAVEAT AL492700E 17/11/2014 Caveator JENNY YUEN TERENCE YUEN Grounds of Claim PURCHASERS' CONTRACT WITH THE FOLLOWING PARTIES AND DATE. Parties THE REGISTERED PROPRIETOR(S) Date 11/10/2014 Estate or Interest FREEHOLD ESTATE Prohibition ABSOLUTELY Lodged by V LIN & CO Notices to VIVIAN MAY LIN of 316 VICTORIA STREET RICHMOND VIC 3121

16/12/2014 18/12/2014 AL565241G (O) Y

CAVEAT CAVEAT AL565241G 16/12/2014 Caveator AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD Grounds of Claim MORTGAGE WITH THE FOLLOWING PARTIES AND DATE. Parties THE REGISTERED PROPRIETOR(S) Date 02/10/2014 Estate or Interest INTEREST AS MORTGAGEE Prohibition ABSOLUTELY Lodged by ANZ RETAIL BANKING Notices to ANZ RETAIL BANKING of LEVEL 4 833 COLLINS STREET MELBOURNE VIC 3008

05/02/2015 05/02/2015 AL663356R (O) Y

WITHDRAWAL OF CAVEAT CAVEAT AL565241G REMOVED

05/02/2015 05/02/2015 AL663357P (O) Y

DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE AFFECTED ENCUMBRANCE(S) AND REMOVED MORTGAGE(S) MORTGAGE AE117622G

05/02/2015 05/02/2015 AL663358M (O) Y

TRANSFER OF LAND BY ENDORSEMENT AND REMOVAL OF CAVEAT AL492700E FROM: KATE LOUISE RYAN TO: TERENCE YUEN JENNY YUEN RESULTING PROPRIETORSHIP: Estate Fee Simple




of 282

Joint Proprietors TERENCE YUEN JENNY YUEN both of 25 JOHN STREET CLIFTON HILL VIC 3068 AL663358M 05/02/2015

05/02/2015 05/02/2015 AL663359K (O) Y

MORTGAGE OF LAND MORTGAGE AL663359K 05/02/2015 WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION

STATEMENT END

VOTS Snapshot

Volume 08943 Folio 219 124003636347B Produced 29/10/2002 03:13 pm

LAND DESCRIPTION

Lot 4 on Plan of Subdivision 042861.PARENT TITLE Volume 05931 Folio 123Created by instrument E467809 21/07/1972


Estate Fee SimpleJoint Proprietors KELLI-JANE GREEN PAUL KENNETH BARCLAY both of 25 JOHN ST CLIFTON HILL 3068 W508999L 07/01/2000


MORTGAGE W509000W 07/01/2000 VICTORIA TEACHERS CREDIT UNION LTD

CAVEAT W578692W 07/02/2000 Caveator JANET LORRAINE GREEN GRAHAM CLARENCE GREEN Capacity FEE SIMPLE SEE CAVEAT Lodged by M K STEELE & GIAMMARIO Notices to M K STEELE & GIAMMARIO; SUITE 1 1ST FL CNR CHURCH & GRIMSHAW STS GREENSBOROUGH 3088

Any encumbrances created by Section 98 Transfer of Land Act 1958 or Section 24 Subdivision Act 1988 and any other encumbrances shown or entered on the plan or imaged folio set out under DIAGRAM LOCATION below.

DIAGRAM LOCATION




of 282

SEE DIAGRAM ON IMAGED FOLIO VOLUME 8943 FOLIO 219 FOR FURTHER DETAILS ANDBOUNDARIES

Paper Title Images

8943/219 - Version 0, Date 03/04/2000




of 282

of 282

Produced 26/10/2015 12:06 PM

Volume 05931 Folio 123Folio Creation: Created as paper folio continued as computer folioParent title Volume 02277 Folio 391

STATEMENT END

Paper Title Images

5931/123 - Version 0, Date 10/11/1999




of 282

of 282

Produced 26/10/2015 12:10 PM

Volume 02277 Folio 391Folio Creation: Details UnknownParent titles : Volume 01689 Folio 774 Volume 01981 Folio 198

STATEMENT END

Paper Title Images

2277/391 - Version 0, Date 29/02/2000




of 282

of 282

Appendix D

Extract of the EPA Priority Sites Register

of 282

PROPERTY INQUIRY DETAILS:

STREET ADDRESS: 25 JOHN STREETSUBURB: CLIFTON HILLMUNICIPALITY: CITY OF YARRAMAP REFERENCES: Melways 40th Edition, Street Directory, Map 2C Reference K1 Melways 40th Edition, Street Directory, Map 44 Reference E1

DATE OF SEARCH: 26th October 2015

PRIORITY SITES REGISTER REPORT:

A search of the Priority Sites Register for the above map references, corresponding to the address given above, has indicated that this site is not listed on, and is not in the vicinity of a site listed on the Priority Sites Register at the above date.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRIORITY SITES REGISTER:

You should be aware that the Priority Sites Register lists only those sites forwhich EPA has requirements for active management of land and groundwater contamination. Appropriate clean up and management of these sites is an EPA priority, and as such, EPA has issued either a: Clean Up Notice pursuant to section 62A, or a Pollution Abatement Notice pursuant to section 31A or 31Bof the Environment Protection Act 1970 on the occupier of the site to require active management of these sites.

The Priority Sites Register does not list all sites known to be contaminated inVictoria. A site should not be presumed to be free of contamination just becauseit does not appear on the Priority Sites Register.

Persons intending to enter into property transactions should be aware that manyproperties may have been contaminated by past land uses and EPA may not be awareof the presence of contamination. EPA has published information advising of potential contaminating land uses. Municipal planning authorities hold information about previous land uses, and it is advisable that such sources of information also be consulted.

For sites listed on the Priority Sites Register, a copy of the relevant Notice,detailing the reasons for issue of the Notice, and management requirements, is available on request from EPA for $8 per Notice.

For more information relating to the Priority Sites Register, refer to EPA contaminated site information bulletin: Priority Sites Register & Contaminated Land Audit Site Listing (EPA Publication 735). For a copy of this publication, copies of relevant Notices, or for more information relating to sites listed onthe Priority Sites Register, please contact EPA as given below:

EPA Information CentreHerald & Weekly Times Tower40 City Road, Southbank 3006Tel: (03)9695 2700 Fax:(03)9695 2710

Extract of EPA Priority Site Register

**** Delivered by the LANDATA® System, Department of Environment, Land, Water &Planning ****

Page 1 of 1

[Extract of Priority Sites Register] # 20532457 - 20532457115749 '25 John Street, Clifton Hill'

of 282

Appendix E

Aerial Photographs

of 282

of 282

Appendix F

MMBW Sewer Plan

of 282

of 282

Appendix G

EnergySafe Victoria Certification

of 282

27 October, 2015 TO: Tony Connolly Environmental Assessment Services Pty Ltd Ph: 9503 0107 M: 0431 533 480 SEARCH FOR CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS With reference to your email of 26/10/2015, a search of the CP database has failed to identify any cathodic protection systems that have been registered at the following location:

25 John Street, Clifton Hill. Yours sincerely

Peter Wade MANAGER ELECTROLYSIS MITIGATION

Disclaimer Energy Safe Victoria provides this information in good faith, but cannot guarantee the accuracy or validate the information provided. The Cathodic Protection (CP) database is a register of currently operating Cathodic Protection systems in Victoria and was established in 1970. The CP database is administered under the Electricity Safety Act 1998 and the Electricity Safety (Cathodic Protection) Regulations 2009. Some underground fuel tanks may not be listed in the CP database including: if the tank is not metallic (therefore not requiring CP); the tank is metallic but CP was not installed; the CP system was not registered, or the CP system has been de-commissioned. If you believe underground tanks may be present and not shown on ESV’s database you should conduct your own tests and investigations.

of 282

Appendix H

WorkSafe Victoria Certification

of 282

of 282

Appendix I

Visualising Victoria’s Groundwater Portal Map

of 282

Scale = 1 : 3386 144.99758, -37.78700 EPSG:900913

Query mode:

Advanced aquifer tools (new)

Layers

Depth to watertable (DEPI)

Groundwater salinity (DEPI)

Elevation of basement (DEPI)

Surface elevation (DEPI)

Bores - DSDBI GSV GEDIS (minerals)

Bores - DEPI FFSR Salinity

Bores - DEPI WMIS (groundwater)

Bores - FedUniSpatial (groundwater)

Mineral Springs

EPA Victoria Sites

Geology (DSDBI GSV)

Results by HERE

Address:

25 John St, Clifton Hill VIC 3068

Bore search:

Info Legend Search Comment

Google Streets

Google Hybrid

Google Streets Greyscale

3D Scene

Visualising Victorias Groundwater - Portal Map

1 of 1

2 Spensley St

5 Spensley St

7-9 Spensley 33 Spensley

43 Grant St

43 John St

5 Heidelberg 3 Heidelberg Rd

SUBJECT SITE

of 282

Appendix J

Groundwater Quality Restricted Zone Pans

of 282

This zone has been cleaned up to therelevant environmental standards (section53X environmental audit) but is stillsubject to restricted groundwater uses.

NORTHCOTE

WALKERST

CUNNINGHAM ST

SOUT

H CR

WALKER ST

EVAN

S CR

ROSS

ST

CUNNINGHAM ST

WALKER ST

HIGH

STWALKER ST

LITTL

EHI

GH ST

CUNNINGHAM ST

ROSS

ST

WALKER ST

CUNNINGHAM ST

HIGH

ST

ROSS

ST

LITTL

E HIG

H ST

LITTL

EHI

GH ST

HIGH

ST

WESTGARTH ST

HIGH

ST

46

42

38

73

52 52

48

3414

6

3345 44

46

38

56

41

39

36

52

67

17

41

43

46

37

24

19

29

41

13

46 50

46

46

7

27

52

45

5347

25

22

22

30

21

45

48

23

39

31

23

12

24

36

27

5153

26 32

55

40

35

52

3441

46

39

47

30

48

51

29

49

69

8

27

25

11

37

17

19

47

35

63

50

32

50

61

28

32

51

18 44

38

21

35

21 25

34

10

54

31

26

33

28

65

27

43

28

28

22

30

52

24

11

33

53

9

54

71

26

29

45

23

31

42

Groundwater zonewith restricted usesNORTHCOTE

For more informationcontact 1300 EPA VIC ± This map may

also containdata from:

Disclaimer: The map represents an approximate estimation of an area where groundwater quality has been impacted byhuman activities. It does not provide information on the naturally occurring quality of groundwater, which can also haverestrictions on its use. The environmental audit boundary and groundwater zone are based on land parcel boundaries at thetime of mapping. Subsequent changes to land parcel boundaries do not change the location of the zone. Map generated on: 27 Oct 2015

0 5025Metres

EPA CARMS ID: 42336 PARTS 1 & 2

Environmental audit site26 - 36 HIGH ST NORTHCOTE VIC 3070

Restrictions on useDrinking waterWater used for recreational purposes (e.g.swimming)Water used for industrial purposes

Site historyElectrical/electrical components manufacture

LegendEnvironmental audit siteGroundwater zone with restricted usesPropertiesUnit/house/building number452Primary road

EPA IBIS ID: 7000050

of 282


CLIFTONHILL

ABBOTSFORD

FAIRFIELD

KIEWA

ST

TRENERRY CR

MERR

I CRE

EK TR

LCL

IFFOR

D PL

STAN

ST

HARRYS LANE

YAMB

LA ST

MAIN

YARR

A TRL

LOUISE ST

ROSENEATH ST

NOONE ST

GRAY

ST

YARRABINGLANE

GROO

M ST

REILLYS WAY

GROO

M ST

BARR

IES PL

NOONE ST

ALEXANDRA PDE EAST

EASTERNFWY

EASTERN FWYHODDLE -EASTERNOUT RAMP

13

6

222

118

9

3

12

208

116

118

146

176

11

2

129

1

19

37

2

20

10

204

2

140

79

23

77

9

21

2925

165

15

12 12

22

151 155

10

31

21

204

1

3

162

10

179

5

198

4

10

7

15

11

4

37

16

17

8

133

127143

11

176

100

11

5

19

9

121

81

7

140

88

1323

2117

171

158

35

11

114

218176

7

197

1

152

1

139

157

131

73

242

23

43144

8

246

149

7

24

9

7

204

8

135

2013

39

15

111

94

168

61

14

137

5

161

187

3

2

168

90

212

248

107

149

19

34

135

31

9

2 8

37

167

3 270

1711

122

3

83

153

23

2

167 171

13

15121

18

165

184172

Groundwater zonewith restricted usesCLIFTON HILL



Disclaimer: The map represents an approximate estimation of an area where groundwater quality has been impacted byhuman activities. It does not provide information on the naturally occurring quality of groundwater, which can also haverestrictions on its use. The environmental audit boundary and groundwater zone are based on land parcel boundaries at thetime of mapping. Subsequent changes to land parcel boundaries do not change the location of the zone. Map generated on: 27 Oct 2015

0 5025Metres

EPA CARMS ID: 56350-1

Environmental audit site204 NOONE ST CLIFTON HILL VIC 3068

Restrictions on useDrinking waterLivestock water supplyWater used for recreational purposes (e.g.swimming)

Site historyTextile manufacturer/operations



of 282


CLIFTONHILL

ABBOTSFORD

FAIRFIELD

GROO

M ST

MAIN YARRA TRL

MERRI CREEK TRL

TRENERRY CR

STAN

ST

HARRYS LANE

MAUGIE ST

MAIN

YARR

A TRL

GRAY

ST

NOONE ST

REILLYS WAY

GROO

M ST

BARR

IES PL

NOONE ST

ALEXANDRAPDE EAST

EASTERN FWY

EASTERN FWY

EASTERN IN - HODDLE RAMP

HODDLE -EASTERNOUT RAMP

226

1321

1

11

26

1

137

179

5

198

16810

158

118

204

11

4

204176

9 7

45

31

23204

35

3

248

135

176172

14616

17

123 133

2

10

153

236 25

15

22

10

175

15

1

115

24

244

19

8

13

35

21

29

222

9

3

12

208 218

169

7

165

5

126

29

176

157

2

37

246

1

149

24

9

18

184172

2707

2524

16

20

135

20 5

Groundwater zonewith restricted usesCLIFTON HILL



Disclaimer: The map represents an approximate estimation of an area where groundwater quality has been impacted byhuman activities. It does not provide information on the naturally occurring quality of groundwater, which can also haverestrictions on its use. The environmental audit boundary and groundwater zone are based on land parcel boundaries at thetime of mapping. Subsequent changes to land parcel boundaries do not change the location of the zone. Map generated on: 17 Feb 2016

0 5025Metres

EPA CARMS ID: 62848-2

Environmental audit site163 - 175 NOONE ST CLIFTON HILL VIC3068

Restrictions on useDrinking waterLivestock water supplyIrrigation of crops (including domestic gardens)and parksWater used for recreational purposes (e.g.swimming)

Site historyDyeworks



of 282

Appendix K

Groundwater Resources Map

of 282

For further information about this report contact:Department of Environment, Land, Water & PlanningEmail: [email protected]

For further information on groundwater licensing in this area contact:Southern Rural Water CorporationPhone: 1300 139 510Email: [email protected]: www.srw.com.au

Groundwater catchment : East Port Phillip Bay VICGRID94 Easting: 2499642 Northing: 2412529

Depth to Water Table: 10 - 20m Water Table Salinity (mg/L): 1001-3500

DepthBelow Surface

(m)

GroundwaterSalinity(mg/L)

Groundwater Layers (Aquifers and Aquitards)

(GMU) Depth Below

Surface (m)

Groundwater ManagementUnit (GMU)

PCV(ML/yr)

UTB Upper Tertiary / Quaternary Basaltbasalt (fractured rock)

0

Unknown

13

Unincorporated Area

BSE Mesozoic and Palaeozoic Bedrock (basement)sedimentary (fractured rock): Sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, shale. Igneous (fractured rock): includes volcanics, granites, granodiorites.

13

1001-3500

213

Unincorporated Area

Printed: 27 Oct 2015Date Updated: 31 May 2014

DisclaimerThis publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.

Groundwater Resource Report of 282

Introduction

Groundwater is part of the water cycle. When rain or snow falls on land, some of it evaporates, some flows to streams and rivers, and some seeps into the soil. Some of the water in the soil is used by plants but some continues to move down through the soil and rock until all the pores and cracks are full of water. This is known as the water table and this water is called groundwater.

Groundwater is a finite resource that, like surface water, is allocated under the Water Act (1989). A Bore Construction Licence is required to drill for groundwater including for domestic and stock purposes. Taking and using groundwater for commercial or irrigation purposesrequires an additional licence.

Purpose of this report

This report has been prepared to provide potential groundwater users with basic information about groundwater beneath theirproperty. This includes the different geological layers, the depths of the layers and the salinity of groundwater in the layers. Information on the groundwater management units (GMU) and any associated caps on the volume that can be licensed (the PCV) are also provided.

Definitions and context

Term Description

Groundwater Catchment An identified area of the State within which groundwater resources are connected.

Easting / Northing The VICGRID 94 coordinates of the spot that was selected on the interactive map.

Groundwater Salinity Indicates the possible concentration of salts within the groundwater. The salt content indicates the possible uses of the water (see the Beneficial Use Table below). Fertilisers and other contaminants can also enter groundwater and affect its use. It is up to you to make sure that the groundwater you use is suitable for your purpose.

Aquifer An aquifer is a layer of soil or rock which stores usable volumes of groundwater. Aquifers are generally limestones, gravels and sands, as well as some fractured rocks where the cracks in the rock are open and connected (some basalts, sandstones and limestones). How much water can be pumped from an aquifer depends on how much water is stored in pores and cracks, how well connected the pores and cracks are, and how thick the layer is. It is more likely that volumes of water for irrigation and urban water supply will come from gravels, sands, limestones and basalts that are at least 30 metres thick. Low volumes of water for domestic and stock use are likely from any aquifer greater than 10 metres thick. The advice above is a guide only, as the amount of water available can be highly variable. Actual pumping volumes can only be determined from drilling, appropriate construction and testing of a bore.

Aquitard An aquitard is a layer of rock or soil that does not allow water to move through it easily, limiting its capacity to supply water. Aquitards are generally silts, clays and fractured rocks (where there are few cracks in the rock or the cracks are poorly connected).

Groundwater Management Unit (GMU)

A collective term for groundwater management areas (GMAs) and water supply protection areas (WSPAs). GMAs and WSPAs are defined areas and depths below the surface where rules for groundwater use may apply. WSPAs often have caps on groundwater use and plans describing how the resource is managed. GMAs usually have caps on groundwater use and may have local plans and rules. All other areas are managed directly through the Water Act (1989). Always check with your local Rural Water Corporation to be sure that the information on the GMU is correct for your specific location.

Permissible Consumptive Volume (PCV)

A cap that is set under the Water Act (1989) declaring the total volume of groundwater that may be taken from the area. Once the PCV is reached, no additional extraction can be licensed for use within the area unless traded from another groundwater licence holder.

Depth to Water Table This is an indication of the depth at which groundwater might first be encountered when drilling a bore. The depth can vary from year to year, and from place to place and may vary significantly from that indicated in this report.

Beneficial use table

AccessibilityIf you would like to receive this publication in an alternate format, please telephone or email the DELWP Customer Service Centre 136 186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au.

© The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning 2015This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968.

DisclaimerThis publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.

How to read this report of 282

Appendix L

State Groundwater Bore Database Reports

of 282

bore_idbore_cod

eparish_n

amemonitoring

statuszone

longitude_gda94

latitude_gda94

mga easting

mga northing

datecompconstructed

depthboretype uses1 uses2 uses3 driller drillmth initial_swl

digitisedelevation

Distance (m) Direction

4016107 119915 N 55 144.995 ‐37.7906 323454.2 5815529 12/02/1992 9 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation CROWDER GREGORY R Down‐Hole Hammer Percussion 32.5 275 SSW

4016108 119916 N 55 144.995 ‐37.7909 323456.2 5815492 12/02/1992 7 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation CROWDER GREGORY R Down‐Hole Hammer Percussion 31.7 309 SSW

4016109 119917 N 55 144.995 ‐37.7905 323454.2 5815532 21/01/1992 5 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation CROWDER GREGORY R Hand Auger 32.75 272 SSW

4016110 119918 N 55 144.995 ‐37.7908 323454.2 5815504 21/01/1992 6.8 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation CROWDER GREGORY R Rotary Air 31.48 298 SSW

4016111 119919 N 55 144.995 ‐37.7908 323460.2 5815497 21/01/1992 8 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation CROWDER GREGORY R Rotary Air 32.19 303 SSW

4018961 124166 N 55 144.9792 ‐37.7883 322063.2 5815754 14/09/1994 8 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation TURNBULL L A Hand Auger 28.46 1477 W

4022880 131161 N 55 144.9854 ‐37.7923 322613.2 5815314 29/11/1995 12 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation CROWDER GREGORY R Down‐Hole Hammer Percussion 25.58 1042 WSW

4022881 131162 N 55 144.9836 ‐37.7931 322463.2 5815224 30/11/1995 11.5 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation CROWDER GREGORY R Down‐Hole Hammer Percussion 23.67 1216 WSW

4027488 140104 N 55 144.9908 ‐37.7911 323090.2 5815461 31/08/1999 4 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation DAMON SCOFFERN Hand Auger 31.12 557 SW


4027490 140106 N 55 144.9908 ‐37.7913 323088.2 5815435 6/09/1999 8.8 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation DAMON SCOFFERN Hand Auger 30.66 574 SW

4027491 140116 N 55 144.9908 ‐37.7911 323090.2 5815464 21/12/1999 4 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation DAMON SCOFFERN Not Known 31.14 555 SW

4027492 140117 N 55 144.9908 ‐37.7912 323090.2 5815454 21/10/1999 3.4 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation DAMON SCOFFERN Not Known 30.98 561 SW


4027494 140119 N 55 144.9909 ‐37.7911 323098.2 5815461 21/10/1999 4 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation DAMON SCOFFERN Not Known 31 551 SW

4027780 140459 N 55 144.9908 ‐37.7911 323091.2 5815461 8/02/2000 4 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation DAMON SCOFFERN Mechanical Auger 31.09 556 SW



4027800 140480 N 55 144.9908 ‐37.7913 323089.2 5815443 8/02/2000 6.2 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation DAMON SCOFFERN Mechanical Auger 30.77 569 SW

4027802 140482 N 55 144.9909 ‐37.7914 323100.2 5815423 8/03/2000 8.5 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation DAMON SCOFFERN Hand Auger 30.3 573 SW


4027812 140492 N 55 144.9906 ‐37.7914 323068.2 5815423 2/05/2000 10 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation DAMON SCOFFERN Rotary Air 30.43 598 SW



4029517 142795 N 55 144.9842 ‐37.7921 322513.2 5815334 28/01/1999 15 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation BURWALD SIMON Mechanical Auger 24.99 1123 WSW



4029520 142798 N 55 144.9842 ‐37.7921 322513.2 5815334 1/02/1999 15.25 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation BURWALD SIMON Mechanical Auger 24.99 1123 WSW

4029527 142810 N 55 144.9842 ‐37.7921 322513.2 5815334 6/02/1999 6 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation FRY I G Mechanical Auger 24.99 1123 WSW





4029651 142976 N 55 144.9834 ‐37.7818 322413.2 5816484 28/01/2000 12.8 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation HANNAKER CHRIS A Mechanical Auger 34.59 1323 WNW

4156445 WRK052160 N 55 144.9777 ‐37.7781 321905 5816877 1/06/2011 14.5 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 1963 WNW

4156446 WRK052161 N 55 144.9777 ‐37.7783 321905 5816853 22/02/2010 14.5 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Down‐Hole Hammer Percussion 40.04 1950 WNW

4157120 WRK054840 N 55 144.9799 ‐37.7984 322149 5814634 10/02/2010 13 Groundwater Observation DANIEL BRODY Mechanical Auger 26.35 1809 SW

4157435 WRK055763 N 55 144.9829 ‐37.7846 322379 5816170 23/03/2010 14 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Mechanical Auger 32.87 1222 WNW

4157706 WRK056562 N 55 145.0106 ‐37.7845 324816 5816227 27/04/2010 12.2 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Hand Auger 34.36 1349 ENE

4157796 WRK056951 N 55 145.0106 ‐37.7845 324818 5816227 28/07/2010 12 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 34.35 1351 ENE






4157802 WRK056957 N 55 145.0106 ‐37.7844 324814 5816244 2/02/2011 12 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 1352 ENE

4157987 WRK057456 N 55 144.9929 ‐37.7939 323281 5815153 19/07/2010 8.5 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Hand Auger 20.7 688 SSW

4158144 WRK057834 N 55 144.9779 ‐37.7843 321941 5816192 12/07/2010 21 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Down‐Hole Hammer Percussion 33.73 1649 WNW

4158153 WRK057847 N 55 144.9854 ‐37.7952 322626 5814993 7/07/2010 10 Groundwater Observation TURNER B Hand Auger 21.1 1213 SW

4159191 WRK060089 N 55 144.9769 ‐37.7963 321874 5814863 16/12/2010 11.5 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Hand Auger 1907 WSW

4159192 WRK060090 N 55 144.9768 ‐37.7963 321873 5814854 16/12/2010 11 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Hand Auger 1912 WSW

4159414 WRK060438 N 55 144.9962 ‐37.7882 323558 5815774 1/01/2011 25 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 24 SE

4159495 WRK060685 N 55 144.9948 ‐37.7912 323440 5815459 24/01/2011 10 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Mechanical Auger 346 SSW

4160072 WRK062366 N 55 144.9798 ‐37.7983 322138 5814644 13/05/2011 12 Groundwater Observation DANIEL BRODY Mechanical Auger 1811 SW

4160227 WRK063158 N 55 144.9777 ‐37.7781 321908 5816877 8/07/2011 14 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Down‐Hole Hammer Percussion 1961 WNW

4161789 WRK069605 N 55 144.977 ‐37.796 321890 5814895 7/06/2012 13 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Rotary Air 1877 WSW

4161790 WRK069606 N 55 144.9771 ‐37.7959 321895 5814900 7/06/2012 13 Groundwater Observation DANIEL BRODY 1870 WSW

4161797 WRK069628 N 55 144.9906 ‐37.7943 323078 5815104 22/05/2012 22 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 827 SW

4161798 WRK069629 N 55 144.9961 ‐37.7955 323566 5814980 30/05/2012 20 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Rotary Mud 810 S

4161799 WRK069630 N 55 144.9868 ‐37.794 322740 5815130 23/05/2012 31 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 1037 SW

4161800 WRK069631 N 55 144.983 ‐37.7936 322407 5815167 5/06/2012 27 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Rotary Mud 1293 WSW

4161801 WRK069632 N 55 144.978 ‐37.7931 321969 5815214 14/06/2012 25.5 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 1673 WSW

Bore Location Repot

of 282

bore_idbore_cod

eparish_n

amemonitoring

statuszone

longitude_gda94

latitude_gda94

mga easting

mga northing

datecompconstructed

depthboretype uses1 uses2 uses3 driller drillmth initial_swl

digitisedelevation

Distance (m) Direction

Bore Location Repot

4161802 WRK069633 N 55 144.9961 ‐37.7955 323566 5814980 13/07/2012 29.5 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 810 S

4161831 WRK069722 N 55 144.9797 ‐37.7931 322113 5815201 14/06/2013 46 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Diamond Core 1544 WSW

4162034 WRK070420 N 55 144.9847 ‐37.7939 322562 5815141 14/08/2012 40.5 Groundwater Observation HOGAN DAVID Hand Auger 1174 WSW

4162035 WRK070421 N 55 144.9885 ‐37.794 322895 5815116 17/07/2013 64.2 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Mechanical Auger 933 SW

4162040 WRK070451 N 55 144.9925 ‐37.7946 323246 5815066 9/07/2013 58.5 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Mechanical Auger 781 SSW

4162041 WRK070453 N 55 144.9755 ‐37.7928 321749 5815247 13/06/2012 31.7 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 1872 WSW

4162064 WRK070617 N 55 144.977 ‐37.796 321890 5814895 5/09/2012 6 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Mechanical Auger 1877 WSW






4162137 WRK070855 N 55 144.9943 ‐37.7865 323390 5815980 29/08/2012 17.1 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Mechanical Auger 242 NW

4162138 WRK070856 N 55 144.9943 ‐37.7865 323390 5815980 29/08/2012 17.3 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 242 NW

4162730 WRK073452 N 55 144.998 ‐37.7984 323741 5814664 1/01/2011 21 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 1144 S

4162752 WRK073636 N 55 144.9911 ‐37.7784 323084 5816874 27/04/2012 13 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 1176 NNW




4162843 WRK074221 N 55 144.9839 ‐37.7853 322467 5816079 4/04/2013 11 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Mechanical Auger 1111 WNW





4162862 WRK074435 N 55 144.9899 ‐37.7943 323021 5815093 8/05/2013 13.5 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Rotary Mud 869 SW



4162997 WRK075058 N 55 144.9867 ‐37.7939 322732 5815131 7/08/2013 19 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN Mechanical Auger 1043 SW

4162999 WRK075060 N 55 144.9824 ‐37.7934 322357 5815172 1/08/2013 28 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 1335 WSW

4163000 WRK075061 N 55 144.9838 ‐37.7936 322478 5815154 15/08/2013 28 Groundwater Observation NOT KNOWN 1238 WSW

4132914 WRK962699 N 55 144.9768 ‐37.7859 321846 5816011 13/09/2003 24 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation BARWALD SIMON Mechanical Auger 30.97 1708 W

4132915 WRK962700 N 55 144.9768 ‐37.7867 321844 5815921 13/09/2003 24 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation BARWALD SIMON Mechanical Auger 30 1701 W



4133031 WRK963459 N 55 144.9854 ‐37.7953 322620 5814980 18/11/2003 9.9 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation HANNAKER CHRIS A Rotary Air 21 1226 SW

4133032 WRK963460 N 55 144.9856 ‐37.7949 322640 5815030 18/11/2003 15.9 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation HANNAKER CHRIS A Rotary Air 21.01 1178 SW

4133917 WRK966500 N 55 144.9834 ‐37.7969 322450 5814800 29/07/2004 10.5 Groundwater Groundwater Investigation NOONAN MATT Rotary Air 23.7 1472 SW

4137720 WRK979415 N 55 144.9836 ‐37.793 322462 5815234 25 Groundwater NOT KNOWN 23.66 1213 WSW

4139193 WRK982211 N 55 144.9997 ‐37.7947 323881 5815076 25 Groundwater NOT KNOWN 20.99 791 SSE

4139213 WRK982312 N 55 145.0148 ‐37.7836 325189 5816339 25 Groundwater NOT KNOWN 35.01 1738 ENE



4140096 WRK984185 N 55 144.9829 ‐37.7846 322379 5816173 25 Groundwater NOT KNOWN 32.93 1223 WNW

4140273 WRK984624 N 55 144.98 ‐37.7971 322149 5814770 25 Groundwater NOT KNOWN 25.01 1725 SW






4141526 WRK987474 N 55 144.9969 ‐37.7831 323606 5816366 25 Groundwater NOT KNOWN 36.81 580 N

4141544 WRK987514 N 55 145.0041 ‐37.7889 324254 5815735 25 Groundwater NOT KNOWN 32.02 716 E



4142161 WRK988597 N 55 144.9997 ‐37.7947 323882 5815077 25 Groundwater NOT KNOWN 21.04 791 SSE




of 282

bore_code aq_from aq_to water_from water_to lithology pdepth prate ptime ddown rtime ptype tdate transmissivityhydraulic

conductivitystorativity yield

parameter source

119916 BASA 0 0 12/02/1992

119917 BASA 0 0 21/01/1992

119918 BASA 0 0 21/01/1992

119919 BASA 0 0 21/01/1992

140105 15 PUM 3/09/1999 0.1

140106 15 PUM 6/09/1999 0.1

140106 15 6/09/1999 0.1

140116 15 PUM 21/12/1999 0.1

140117 15 PUM 21/10/1999 0.1

140118 15 PUM 21/10/1999 0.1

140119 15 PUM 21/10/1999 0.1

140459 15 PUM 8/02/2000 0.1

140459 15 PUM 8/02/2000 0.1

140461 15 PUM 8/02/2000 0.1

140461 15 PUM 8/02/2000 0.1

140462 15 PUM 8/02/2000 0.1

140462 15 PUM 8/02/2000 0.1

140480 15 PUM 8/02/2000 0.1

140480 15 PUM 8/02/2000 0.1

140482 15 PUM 8/03/2000 0.1

140482 15 PUM 8/03/2000 0.1

140485 15 PUM 2/05/2000 0.1

140492 15 PUM 2/05/2000 0.1

140492 15 PUM 2/05/2000 0.1

140493 15 PUM 8/05/2000 0.1

140493 15 PUM 8/05/2000 0.1

140494 15 PUM 8/05/2000 0.1

140494 15 PUM 8/05/2000 0.1

Bore Aquifer Report

of 282

bore_code screen_number screen_typescreen

diameterscreen

aperturescreen from

screen to screen infilter from

filter_tofilter_

materialcomments source

119915 0 FILTER 4 9 Filter Gravel GMS import

119915 1 PVC 50 0.4 6 9 BASA GMS import


119916 1 PVC 50 0.4 4 7 GMS import

119917 0 FILTER 1.5 5 Filter Gravel GMS import

119917 1 P18 50 0.8 1.5 4.5 BASA GMS import

119918 0 FILTER 1.8 6.8 Filter Gravel GMS import

119918 1 P18 50 0.8 3.8 6.8 BASA GMS import


119919 1 P18 50 0.8 5 8 BASA GMS import

131161 0 FILTER 7.5 12 Filter Gravel GMS import

131161 1 PVC 50 0.6 9 12 GMS import


131162 1 PVC 50 0.6 7 11.4 GMS import


140104 1 P18 32 0.5 1 4 GMS import


140105 1 P18 50 1 3 8 GMS import

140106 0 FILTER 3 8.8 Filter Gravel GMS import

140106 1 P18 50 1 3 8.8 GMS import


140116 1 P18 50 1 1 4 GMS import


140117 1 P18 50 1 0.4 3.4 GMS import


140118 1 P18 50 1 1 4 GMS import


140119 1 P18 50 1 1 4 GMS import


140459 1 P18 50 1 1 4 GMS import


140461 1 P18 50 1 1 4 GMS import


140462 1 P18 50 1 1 4 GMS import


140480 1 P18 50 1 3.2 6.2 GMS import


140482 1 P18 50 1 5.5 8.5 GMS import


140485 1 P18 50 1 4 10 GMS import


140492 1 P18 50 1 4 10 GMS import



140494 1 P18 50 1 4 10 GMS import


142795 1 P18 50 0.4 12 15 SIST GMS import


142796 1 PSC 50 0.4 12 15 SIST GMS import


142797 1 P18 50 0.4 12 15 SIST GMS import


142798 1 P18 50 0.4 11.25 14.25 BASA GMS import


142976 1 PVC 50 0.4 9.8 12.8 GMS import

WRK052161 0 FILTER 8 14.5 Filter Gravel GMS import

WRK052161 1 PVC 1 8.5 14.5 BASA GMS import

WRK054840 0 FILTER 8 13 Filter Gravel GMS import

WRK054840 1 PVC 1 9 13 CLAY GMS import

WRK055763 0 FILTER 7.5 14 Filter Gravel GMS import

WRK055763 1 PVC 8 14 BASA GMS import








WRK057511 1 PVC 10 16 CLAY GMS import


WRK057834 1 PVC 1 14 21 BASA GMS import




WRK057858 1 PVC 1 6 10 SIST GMS import


WRK057859 1 PVC 6 10 SIST GMS import





Bore Screen Report

of 282

bore_code screen_number screen_typescreen

diameterscreen

aperturescreen from

screen to screen infilter from

filter_tofilter_

materialcomments source

Bore Screen Report








WRK063158 1 PVC 0 7 14 GMS import



WRK066369 0 FILTER 2.3 5.8 Filter Gravel GMS import








WRK069722 1 PVC 0 42.5 45.5 SIST GMS import



WRK070419 1 PVC 0 45.6 48.6 GMS import




WRK070421 1 PVC 0 37.5 40.5 SAND GMS import




WRK070617 1 PVC 1 3 6 SAST GMS import













WRK074433 1 PVC 1 30 32 GRAV GMS import


WRK074434 1 PVC 1 43 49 CONG GMS import








WRK075058 1 SST 0 16 19 BASA GMS import


WRK075060 1 SST 0 25 28 SIST GMS import


WRK075061 1 SST 0 25 28 GMS import


WRK962699 1 PVC 50 0.4 9 24 BASA GMS import







WRK963459 1 PVC 50 0.4 6 9.9 GMS import

WRK963460 1 PVC 50 0.4 10 15.9 GMS import


WRK966500 1 PVC 50 0.4 7.5 10.5 GMS import


WRK988819 1 PVC 11 20 GMS import







of 282

Appendix M

Data Quality Objectives

of 282

The subject site is located in a primarily residential area. The site may be considered to be potentially contaminated due to previous land use (i.e. importation of fill and building materials and paving).

The purpose of the assessment was to assess the contamination status of the soil and groundwater components at the subject site to facilitate the requirements of a Statutory Environmental Audit, through background investigations and site assessment works.

The assessment works were carried out by a suitably qualified environmental consultant under the review of an Environmental Auditor (Contaminated Land).

The environmental assessment has been undertaken to confirm (or otherwise) that the site has been contaminated by previous land use and where necessary determine site management requirements to allow for the intended land use.

Inputs to the decision included:

Desktop study (site history review, geology review, hydrogeology review, review of former site assessment reports, review of completed environmental audit reports, review of below ground service information). Site reconnaissance (inspection of entire site, locality review, site liaison).

Soil and groundwater investigation (incorporating a quality assurance / quality control program).

Reference to existing criteria.

The physical site boundary is depicted in Figure 2. The temporal boundary relates to the sites existing conditions encountered during the assessment works. Sampling constraints were encountered below existing buildings, services and structures. Borehole refusal was encountered due to the occurrence of shallow rock / impenetrable sub-surface. Site assessment works were undertaken at discrete sample points. Accordingly, data generated does not characterise the entire Site.

Following a comparison of the data with the adopted criteria (i.e. NEPC), determine actions required. Additional appraisal through statistical evaluation (i.e. 95% calculation of 95% Upper Confidence Level) may be required,

Where action levels are breached, consideration will be given to risk assessment, remedial measures and the development and implementation of site management procedures.

Decision errors were limited through the application of AS4482 applying systematic sampling in accessible areas to sufficiently characterise the chemical stauts of the site.

Sample analysis was undertaken within the specified holding times and where no analytical limitations were applied, all detection limits were reported at lower concentrations than the adopted criteria.

The Quality Assurance / Quality Control program undertaken during the assessment were conducted in accordance with the requirements of AS4482.1 (2005) and the appointed Environmental Auditor. Quality control procedures employed during the ESA included the collection and assessment of quality control samples, an assessment of intra and inter laboratory sample handling and analyses. Quality control data is assessed by calculating the relative percentage differences (RPDs) between data entries using the following equation:

RPD = Result 1 – Result 2 x 100 Mean result

An RPD value of up to 50% is considered acceptable. Higher RPD values can be expected for heterogenous samples (i.e. fill material) and low level analytes.

Internal quality control is conducted by each laboratory which includes duplicate and blank sample analyses, along with spike samples (to assess analyte recovery). Accuracy of spike samples is expected to be within the range 75-125%.

DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES

State the Problem:

Identify the Decision:

Optimise the Design for Obtaining Data:

Identify Input to the Decision:

Define the Study Boundaries:

Develop a Decision Rule:

Specify Limits on Decision Errors:

The sample design was conducted with reference to AS4482.1 and the environmental auditor, applying systematic sampling to satisfy the objective of the assessment, allowing for the enhancement of the design though additional sample analysis (i.e. elutriation testing) and a comprehensive appraisal of the inter and intra laboratory sample handling and analysis

of 282

Appendix N

Soil Borehole Log Sheets

of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:

SITE: 25 John Street, Clifton Hill

SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH01BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 1.00m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:

Hand Auger / split core sampling

TC

FILL: dark brown sand, minor organic matter, glass, slate, crushed rock

FILL: dark brown sand, disturbed brown clay

CLAY: brown, firm, medium plasticity0.5

1.0

BH01/0.05

BH01/0.20

BH01/0.50

BH01/0.90

Borehole terminated at: 1 metres

0.0 - 0.2m, No odour (+BR1 & SPLIT)

0.2 - 0.3m, No odour



0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

REMARKS

of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:


SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH02BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 1.00m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:


TC

FILL: dark brown sand, minor organic matter

FILL: dark brown sand, disturbed brown clay, organic matter

0.5

1.0

BH02/0.05

BH02/0.30

BH02/0.90





0.0

0.0

0.0

REMARKS

Borehole terminated at 1.0m on earthen sewer line

of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:


SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH03BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 0.60m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:


TC

CONCRETE:

FILL: dark grey sand, minor organic matter

FILL: disturbed brown clay

0.5

BH03/0.10

BH03/0.35

Borehole terminated at: 0.6 metres




0.0

0.0

REMARKS


of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:


SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH04BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 1.00m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:


TC

FILL: dark brown sand, silt, organic matter

CLAY: brown, firm, medium plasticity

0.5

1.0

BH04/0.05

BH04/0.40

BH04/0.90





0.0

0.0

0.0

REMARKS

of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:


SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH05BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 1.10m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:


TC




0.5

1.0

BH05/0.05

BH05/0.30

BH05/0.60






0.0

0.0

0.0

REMARKS

of 282

Appendix O

Field Equipment Certificates

of 282

of 282

Appendix P

Site Photographs

of 282

Photograph 1 – BH01 Location & Profile

Photograph 2 – BH02 Location

of 282

Photograph 3 – BH02 Profile


of 282


Photograph 6 ‐ BH04 Location & Profile

of 282



of 282

Appendix Q

Ecological Investigation Level Calculation Sheets

of 282

Fill

of 282

InputsSelect contaminant from list below

Cr_III Land useBelow needed to calculate fresh and aged ACLs (mg contaminant/kg dry soil)

Fresh Aged

39

National parks and areas of high conservation value

80 130

6.8

Commercial and industrial 280 610

6.8

Enter % clay (values from 0 to 100%) 0

7.5Below needed to calculate fresh and aged ABCs 80 130

Measured background concentration (mg/kg). Leave blank if no measured value 180 370

or for fresh ABCs only 280 610Enter iron content (aqua regia method) (values from 0 to 50%) to obtain estimate of background concentration

2.6

or for aged ABCs only

Enter State (or closest State)

VIC

Enter traffic volume (high or low)

high actual result 82.43448523 126.7206863

Outputs

Urban residential and open public spaces

180 370

Cr III soil-specific EILs

of 282


Cu Land useBelow needed to calculate fresh and aged ACLs (mg contaminant/kg dry soil)

Enter cation exchange capacity (silver thiourea method) (values from 0 to 100 cmolc/kg dwt) Fresh Aged

39


65 85

Enter soil pH (calcium chloride method) (values from 1 to 14)

6.8

Enter organic carbon content (%OC) (values from 0 to 50%)


6.8

0

10Below needed to calculate fresh and aged ABCs 65 85



2.6



VIC



Outputs


130 230

Cu soil-specific EILs

of 282


Ni Land useBelow needed to calculate fresh and aged ACLs (mg contaminant/kg dry soil)


39


30 80

6.8


6.8

0




2.6



VIC



Outputs


140 430

Ni soil-specific EILs

of 282


Zn Land useBelow needed to calculate fresh and aged ACLs (mg contaminant/kg dry soil)


39


90 220


6.8


6.8

0

7.5Below needed to calculate fresh and aged ABCs 90 220



2.6



VIC



Outputs


310 810

Zn soil-specific EILs

of 282

Natural Soil

of 282


Cr_III Land useBelow needed to calculate fresh and aged ACLs (mg contaminant/kg dry soil)

Fresh Aged

22


110 190

7


1.5

Enter % clay (values from 0 to 100%) 0




2.3



VIC



Outputs


260 580

Cr III soil-specific EILs

of 282


Cu Land useBelow needed to calculate fresh and aged ACLs (mg contaminant/kg dry soil)


23


65 80


7

Enter organic carbon content (%OC) (values from 0 to 50%)


1.5

0



or for fresh ABCs only 170 320

Enter iron content (aqua regia method) (values from 0 to 50%) to obtain estimate of background concentration

2.3



VIC



Outputs


120 220

Cu soil-specific EILs

of 282


Ni Land useBelow needed to calculate fresh and aged ACLs (mg contaminant/kg dry soil)


23


25 60

7


1.5

0





2.3



VIC



Outputs


100 300

Ni soil-specific EILs

of 282


Zn Land useBelow needed to calculate fresh and aged ACLs (mg contaminant/kg dry soil)


23


95 220


7


1.5

0





2.3



VIC



Outputs


320 830

Zn soil-specific EILs

of 282

Appendix R

Analytical Laboratory Reports

& Chain of Custody Forms

of 282

Certificate of Analysis

Environmental Assessment Serv

4 Allee Street

Brighton

VIC 3186

Attention: Tony Connolly

Report 480951-S

Project name 15029

Received Date Nov 26, 2015

Client Sample ID BH01/0.05 BH01/0.2 BH01/0.5 BH02/0.05

Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M15-No21772 M15-No21773 M15-No21774 M15-No21775

Date Sampled Nov 25, 2015 Nov 25, 2015 Nov 25, 2015 Nov 25, 2015

Test/Reference LOR Unit

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions

TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg 200 - - -

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg 130 - - -

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg 330 - - -

Volatile Organics

1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

1.1-Dichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.1-Dichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.1.1-Trichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.1.2-Trichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.2-Dibromoethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.2-Dichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.2-Dichloropropane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.2.3-Trichloropropane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.2.4-Trimethylbenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -


1.3-Dichloropropane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

1.3.5-Trimethylbenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -


2-Butanone (MEK) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

2-Propanone (Acetone) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

4-Chlorotoluene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Allyl chloride 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Bromobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Bromochloromethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Bromodichloromethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Bromoform 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Bromomethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Carbon disulfide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Date Reported: Dec 03, 2015

Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166

ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Facsimile: +61 3 8564 5090

Page 1 of 20

Report Number: 480951-S

NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 1254

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.The results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.

of 282






Volatile Organics

Carbon Tetrachloride 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Chlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Chloroethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Chloroform 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Chloromethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

cis-1.2-Dichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

cis-1.3-Dichloropropene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Dibromochloromethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Dibromomethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Iodomethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Isopropyl benzene (Cumene) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Methylene Chloride 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Styrene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Tetrachloroethene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

trans-1.2-Dichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

trans-1.3-Dichloropropene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Trichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Vinyl chloride 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 - - -

Fluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 81 - - -

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 81 - - -


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 - - -

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 8.9 8.4 - 16

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 8.9 8.4 - 16

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 8.9 8.4 - 16

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 - < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg 0.7 1.1 - 2.8

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 0.9 1.5 - 4.7

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 3.6 4.4 - 11

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 6.4 5.5 - 11

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg 3.1 5.3 - 8.5

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg 3.7 3.7 - 5.4

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg 3.1 3.8 - 8.0

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg 3.7 3.9 - 9.2

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 1.1 1.1 - 2.0

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg 7.2 8.1 - 22

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 - 1.9

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 3.4 3.3 - 5.2




Page 2 of 20


of 282







Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 - 1.2

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg 3.4 5.3 - 17

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 7.8 6.8 - 18

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg 48 54 - 130

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 95 89 - 90

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 149 82 - 85

Organochlorine Pesticides

Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg 0.06 - - -

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 97 - - -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 83 - - -

Polychlorinated Biphenyls

Aroclor-1016 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1221 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1232 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1242 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1248 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1254 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1260 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Total PCB* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 97 - - -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 83 - - -

Phenols (Halogenated)

2-Chlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

2.4-Dichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

2.6-Dichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Pentachlorophenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -




Page 3 of 20


of 282







Tetrachlorophenols - Total 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Total Halogenated Phenol* 1 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Phenols (non-Halogenated)

2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-dinitrophenol 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

2-Nitrophenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

2.4-Dimethylphenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

2.4-Dinitrophenol 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 - - -

4-Nitrophenol 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

Dinoseb 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

Phenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

Total Non-Halogenated Phenol* 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

Phenol-d6 (surr.) 1 % 70 - - -


TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 - - -

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg 280 - - -

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 - - -

% Clay 1 % - - 30 7.5

Chloride 5 mg/kg - - 27 22

Chromium (hexavalent) 1 mg/kg < 1 - - < 1

Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C) 10 uS/cm - - 81 110

Cyanide (total) 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

Fluoride 100 mg/kg 170 - - -

pH (1:5 Aqueous extract) 0.1 pH Units 6.8 - 7.7 7.2

pH (units)(1:5 soil:CaCl2 extract) 0.1 pH Units - - 7.0 6.8

Sulphate (as S) 10 mg/kg - - < 10 20

Total Organic CarbonM10 0.1 % - - 1.5 6.8

% Moisture 0.1 % 12 9.3 14 14

Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 16 - - 8.8

Beryllium 2 mg/kg < 2 - - < 2

Boron 10 mg/kg < 10 - - < 10

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg 1.7 - - < 0.4

Chromium 5 mg/kg 34 - - -

Cobalt 5 mg/kg 6.6 - - 9.6

Copper 5 mg/kg 91 - - 27

Iron 5 mg/kg - - 23000 26000

Lead 5 mg/kg 830 - - 120

Manganese 5 mg/kg 370 - - 130

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg 0.3 - - < 0.1

Molybdenum 10 mg/kg < 10 - - < 10

Nickel 5 mg/kg 21 - - 19

Selenium 2 mg/kg < 2 - - < 2

Silver 5 mg/kg < 5 - - < 5

Tin 10 mg/kg 20 - - < 10

Vanadium 10 mg/kg 99 - - 74

Zinc 5 mg/kg 1700 - - 500




Page 4 of 20


of 282






Heavy Metals

Iron (%) 0.01 % - - 2.3 2.6

Ion Exchange Properties

Cation Exchange Capacity 0.05 meq/100g - - 23 39







TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg - - < 20 -

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg - - < 20 -

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg - - 140 -

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg - - 110 -

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg - - 250 -

Volatile Organics

1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene 0.2 mg/kg - - < 0.2 -

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.2 mg/kg - - < 0.2 -

1.1-Dichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.1-Dichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.1.1-Trichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.1.2-Trichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.2-Dibromoethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.2-Dichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.2-Dichloropropane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.2.3-Trichloropropane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.2.4-Trimethylbenzene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -


1.3-Dichloropropane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

1.3.5-Trimethylbenzene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -


2-Butanone (MEK) 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

2-Propanone (Acetone) 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

4-Chlorotoluene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Allyl chloride 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Bromobenzene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Bromochloromethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Bromodichloromethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Bromoform 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Bromomethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Carbon disulfide 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Carbon Tetrachloride 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Chlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -




Page 5 of 20


of 282






Volatile Organics

Chloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Chloroform 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Chloromethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

cis-1.2-Dichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

cis-1.3-Dichloropropene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Dibromochloromethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Dibromomethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Iodomethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Isopropyl benzene (Cumene) 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg - - < 0.2 -

Methylene Chloride 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Styrene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Tetrachloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

trans-1.2-Dichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

trans-1.3-Dichloropropene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Trichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Vinyl chloride 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg - - < 0.3 -

Fluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % - - 87 -

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % - - 91 -

Halogenated Volatile Organics

1.1-Dichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.1-Dichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.1.1-Trichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.1.2-Trichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.2-Dibromoethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.2-Dichloroethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.2-Dichloropropane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

1.2.3-Trichloropropane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -


1.3-Dichloropropane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -


Bromodichloromethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Bromoform 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Bromomethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Carbon Tetrachloride 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Chlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Chloroform 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Chloromethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

cis-1.2-Dichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

cis-1.3-Dichloropropene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -




Page 6 of 20


of 282






Halogenated Volatile Organics

Dibromochloromethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Dibromomethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Iodomethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Methylene Chloride 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Tetrachloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

trans-1.2-Dichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

trans-1.3-Dichloropropene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Trichloroethene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Vinyl chloride 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 - -

Fluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % - 82 - -


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg - - < 0.5 -

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg - - < 20 -

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg - - < 20 -

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg - - < 50 -


Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 19 6.9 7.2

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 19 6.9 7.2

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 19 6.9 7.2

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg - 1.7 < 0.5 < 0.5

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - 2.0 < 0.5 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - 10 2.9 3.3

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - 13 4.6 4.8

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg - 11 3.5 4.6

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg - 6.0 3.1 3.3

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - 7.7 3.9 3.0

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg - 9.1 3.2 3.3

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - 1.9 0.9 1.0

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - 13 3.9 5.6

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg - 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - 5.9 2.7 2.9

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg - 7.1 1.9 2.1

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - 13 3.9 5.4

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg - 100 35 40

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % - 97 94 93

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % - 97 94 86


Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -




Page 7 of 20


of 282







Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg - - < 0.05 -

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg - - < 1 -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % - - 132 -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % - - 93 -

Polychlorinated Biphenyls

Aroclor-1016 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Aroclor-1221 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Aroclor-1232 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Aroclor-1242 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Aroclor-1248 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Aroclor-1254 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Aroclor-1260 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Total PCB* 0.1 mg/kg - - < 0.1 -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % - - 132 -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % - - 93 -


2-Chlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - - < 0.5 -

2.4-Dichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - - < 0.5 -

2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 1.0 mg/kg - - < 1 -

2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 1.0 mg/kg - - < 1 -

2.6-Dichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - - < 0.5 -

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1.0 mg/kg - - < 1 -

Pentachlorophenol 1.0 mg/kg - - < 1 -

Tetrachlorophenols - Total 1.0 mg/kg - - < 1 -

Total Halogenated Phenol* 1 mg/kg - - < 1 -

Phenols (non-Halogenated)

2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-dinitrophenol 20 mg/kg - - < 20 -

2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol 5 mg/kg - - < 5 -

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) 0.2 mg/kg - - < 0.2 -

2-Nitrophenol 1.0 mg/kg - - < 1 -

2.4-Dimethylphenol 0.5 mg/kg - - < 0.5 -

2.4-Dinitrophenol 5 mg/kg - - < 5 -

3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) 0.4 mg/kg - - < 0.4 -

4-Nitrophenol 5 mg/kg - - < 5 -

Dinoseb 20 mg/kg - - < 20 -

Phenol 0.5 mg/kg - - < 0.5 -

Total Non-Halogenated Phenol* 20 mg/kg - - < 20 -

Phenol-d6 (surr.) 1 % - - 66 -




Page 8 of 20


of 282







TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg - - < 50 -

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg - - 190 -

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg - - < 100 -

Chromium (hexavalent) 1 mg/kg - < 1 < 1 < 1

Cyanide (total) 5 mg/kg - - < 5 -

Fluoride 100 mg/kg - - 150 -

Nitrate (as N) 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

pH (1:5 Aqueous extract) 0.1 pH Units - - 7.1 -

% Moisture 0.1 % 13 14 7.9 15

Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg - 9.4 4.6 8.3

Beryllium 2 mg/kg - < 2 < 2 < 2

Boron 10 mg/kg - < 10 < 10 < 10

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg - 0.9 0.9 0.6

Chromium 5 mg/kg - - 69 -

Cobalt 5 mg/kg - 9.2 11 6.8

Copper 5 mg/kg - 47 61 46

Lead 5 mg/kg - 960 1000 830

Manganese 5 mg/kg - 210 360 170

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 0.2

Molybdenum 10 mg/kg - < 10 < 10 < 10

Nickel 5 mg/kg - 25 32 22

Selenium 2 mg/kg - < 2 < 2 < 2

Silver 5 mg/kg - < 5 < 5 < 5

Tin 10 mg/kg - 11 38 86

Vanadium 10 mg/kg - 55 24 55

Zinc 5 mg/kg - 1200 1100 860

Client Sample ID BR1-25.11.15

Sample Matrix Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M15-No21780

Date Sampled Nov 25, 2015



Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 7.4

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 7.4

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 7.4

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg 1.0

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 1.2

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 4.1

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 4.9

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg 4.7

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg 2.8

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg 4.1

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg 3.7

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 0.9




Page 9 of 20


of 282

Client Sample ID BR1-25.11.15

Sample Matrix Soil





Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg 7.3

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 2.6

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg 4.2

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 6.3

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg 48

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 98

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 93

% Moisture 0.1 % 7.7




Page 10 of 20


of 282

Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results (regarding both quality and NATA accreditation).

If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.

Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time

Vic EPA IWRG 621 (Solids)

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 14 Day

- Method: TRH C6-C36 - LTM-ORG-2010

Volatile Organics Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 7 Day

- Method: USEPA 8260 - MGT 350A Volatile Organics by GCMS



Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 14 Day

- Method: USEPA 8270 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Organochlorine Pesticides Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 14 Day

- Method: USEPA 8081 Organochlorine Pesticides

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 28 Day

- Method: USEPA 8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls

Phenols (Halogenated) Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 14 Day

- Method: USEPA 8270 Phenols

Phenols (non-Halogenated) Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 14 Day

- Method: USEPA 8270 Phenols



Chromium (hexavalent) Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 28 Day

- Method: APHA 3500-Cr Hexavalent Chromium- (Extraction:- USEPA3060)

Cyanide (total) Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 14 Day

- Method: LTM-INO-4020 Total Free WAD Cyanide by CFA

Fluoride Melbourne Nov 27, 2015 28 Day

- Method: NEPC 404 (Fusion followed by ISE)

pH (1:5 Aqueous extract) Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 7 Day

- Method: LTM-GEN-7090 pH in soil by ISE

IWRG 621 Metals : Metals M12 Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 28 Day

- Method: LTM-MET-3030 by ICP-OES (hydride ICP-OES for Mercury)

Halogenated Volatile Organics Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 7 Day

- Method: USEPA 8260 MGT 350A Halogenated Volatile Organics

Chloride Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 28 Day

- Method: MGT 1100A

Nitrate (as N) Melbourne Nov 30, 2015 28 Day

- Method: APHA 4500-NO3 Nitrate Nitrogen by FIA

Sulphate (as S) Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 28 Day

- Method: In house MGT1110A (SO4 by Discrete Analyser)

Heavy Metals Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 180 Day


NEPM Screen for Soil Classification

% Clay Brisbane Nov 27, 2015 6 Day

- Method: LTM-GEN-7040

Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C) Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 7 Day

- Method: LTM-INO-4030

pH (units)(1:5 soil:CaCl2 extract) Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 7 Day

- Method: LTM-GEN-7090 pH in soil by ISE

Total Organic Carbon Melbourne Nov 30, 2015 28 Day

- Method: APHA 5310B Total Organic Carbon

Ion Exchange Properties Melbourne Nov 27, 2015

% Moisture Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 14 Day

- Method: LTM-GEN-7080 Moisture




Page 11 of 20


of 282

.Company Name: Environmental Assessment Serv Order No.: Received: Nov 26, 2015 6:02 PMAddress: 4 Allee Street Report #: 480951 Due: Dec 4, 2015

Brighton Phone: 9503 0107 Priority: 5 DayVIC 3186 Fax: 9503 0156 Contact Name: Tony Connolly

Project Name: 15029

Eurofins | mgt Client Manager: Onur Mehmet

Sample Detail

Chloride

HO

LD

Molybdenum

Nitrate (as N

)

pH (1:5 A

queous extract)

Silver

Sulphate (as S

)

Tin

Vanadium

Polycyclic A

romatic H

ydrocarbons

NE

PM

2013 Metals : M

etals M13

Halogenated V

olatile Organics

Moisture S

et

NE

PM

Screen for S

oil Classification

Vic E

PA

IWR

G 621 (S

olids)

Laboratory where analysis is conducted

Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217

Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794 X

External Laboratory

Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime

Matrix LAB ID

BH01/0.05 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21772 X X X X

BH01/0.2 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21773 X X

BH01/0.5 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21774 X X X X X

BH02/0.05 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21775 X X X X X X X X X X X

BH02/0.9 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21776 X X

BH03/0.1 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21777 X X X X X X X X


BH05/0.05 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21779 X X X X X X X

BR1-25.11.15 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21780 X X

RB1-25.11.15 Nov 25, 2015 Water M15-No21781 X

ABN – 50 005 085 521 e.mail : [email protected] web : www.eurofins.com.au

MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne3-5 Kingston Town CloseOakleigh VIC 3166Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271

SydneySydneySydneySydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217

BrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794

Date Reported:Dec 03, 2015



Page 12 of 20


of 282

Company Name: Environmental Assessment Serv Order No.: Received: Nov 26, 2015 6:02 PMAddress: 4 Allee Street Report #: 480951 Due: Dec 4, 2015


Project Name: 15029


Sample Detail

Chloride

HO

LD

Molybdenum

Nitrate (as N

)

pH (1:5 A

queous extract)

Silver

Sulphate (as S

)

Tin

Vanadium

Polycyclic A

romatic H

ydrocarbons

NE

PM

2013 Metals : M

etals M13

Halogenated V

olatile Organics

Moisture S

et

NE

PM

Screen for S

oil Classification

Vic E

PA

IWR

G 621 (S

olids)





External Laboratory

TB1-25.11.15 Nov 25, 2015 Water M15-No21782 X

BH01/0.9 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21783 X

BH02/0.3 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21784 X

BH03/0.35 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21785 X

BH04/0.4 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21786 X

BH04/0.9 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21787 X

BH05/0.3 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21788 X

BH05/0.6 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21789 X








Page 13 of 20


of 282

Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary

General

Holding Times

Units

Terms

QC - Acceptance Criteria

QC Data General Comments

1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on

request.

2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.

3. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.

4. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries.

5. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.

6. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis. 7. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.

Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).

For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample

Receipt Advice.

If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.

Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.

**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD

mg/kg: milligrams per Kilogram mg/l: milligrams per litre

ug/l: micrograms per litre ppm: Parts per million

ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage

org/100ml: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units

MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres

Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.

LOR Limit of Reporting.

SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.

RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.

LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery

CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery

Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands.

In the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.

Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.

Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.

Batch Duplicate A second piece of analysis from a sample outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis.

Batch SPIKE Spike recovery reported on a sample from outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis.

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

APHA American Public Health Association

ASLP Australian Standard Leaching Procedure (AS4439.3)

TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

COC Chain of Custody

SRA Sample Receipt Advice

CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report

NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within

TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient

RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:

Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit

Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%

Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%

Surrogate Recoveries : Recoveries must lie between 50-150% - Phenols 20-130%.

1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within

the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.

2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent

and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.

3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxophene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.

4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxophene is not added to the Spike.

5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported

in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.

6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.

Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.

7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.

8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Arochlor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS's.

9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.

10. Duplicate RPD's are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.




Page 14 of 20


of 282

Quality Control Results

Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits

PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank


Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Method Blank

Chloride mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Acenaphthene % 82 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene % 93 70-130 Pass

Anthracene % 79 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene % 101 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene % 91 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene % 82 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 71 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene % 91 70-130 Pass

Chrysene % 117 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 85 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene % 77 70-130 Pass

Fluorene % 86 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 83 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene % 91 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene % 78 70-130 Pass

Pyrene % 75 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

Chloride % 92 70-130 Pass

Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance

LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1

4.4'-DDD M15-No21772 CP % 103 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE M15-No21772 CP % 96 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT M15-No21772 CP % 124 70-130 Pass

a-BHC M15-No21772 CP % 116 70-130 Pass

Aldrin M15-No21772 CP % 92 70-130 Pass

b-BHC M15-No21772 CP % 96 70-130 Pass

d-BHC M15-No21772 CP % 88 70-130 Pass

Dieldrin M15-No21772 CP % 101 70-130 Pass




Page 15 of 20


of 282


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Endosulfan I M15-No21772 CP % 121 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan II M15-No21772 CP % 128 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate M15-No21772 CP % 87 70-130 Pass

Endrin M15-No21772 CP % 107 70-130 Pass

Endrin aldehyde M15-No21772 CP % 109 70-130 Pass

Endrin ketone M15-No21772 CP % 104 70-130 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) M15-No21772 CP % 125 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor M15-No21772 CP % 117 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide M15-No21772 CP % 88 70-130 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene M15-No21772 CP % 108 70-130 Pass

Methoxychlor M15-No21772 CP % 115 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Result 1

Fluoride M15-No21772 CP % 76 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Result 1

Chloride M15-No21775 CP % 94 70-130 Pass

Sulphate (as S) M15-No21775 CP % 107 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Heavy Metals Result 1

Arsenic M15-No21779 CP % 93 75-125 Pass

Beryllium M15-No21779 CP % 91 75-125 Pass

Boron M15-No21779 CP % 83 75-125 Pass

Cadmium M15-No21779 CP % 89 75-125 Pass

Chromium M15-No21779 CP % 89 75-125 Pass

Cobalt M15-No21779 CP % 88 75-125 Pass

Copper M15-No21779 CP % 124 75-125 Pass

Mercury M15-No21779 CP % 114 70-130 Pass

Molybdenum M15-No21779 CP % 86 75-125 Pass

Nickel M15-No21779 CP % 91 75-125 Pass

Silver M15-No21779 CP % 96 75-125 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD

TRH C6-C9 M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass

TRH C10-C14 M15-No20317 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass



Duplicate

Volatile Organics Result 1 Result 2 RPD

1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Hexachlorobutadiene M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

1.1-Dichloroethane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.1-Dichloroethene M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.1.1-Trichloroethane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.1.2-Trichloroethane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.2-Dibromoethane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.2-Dichloroethane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.2-Dichloropropane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.2.3-Trichloropropane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

1.3-Dichloropropane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Bromochloromethane M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Isopropyl benzene (Cumene) M15-De01184 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass




Page 16 of 20


of 282

Duplicate

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Chlordanes - Total M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDD M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDE M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDT M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

a-BHC M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Aldrin M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

b-BHC M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

d-BHC M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Dieldrin M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg 0.06 < 0.05 45 30% Fail Q15

Endosulfan I M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan II M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan sulphate M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin aldehyde M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin ketone M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor epoxide M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Hexachlorobenzene M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Methoxychlor M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Toxaphene M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Aroclor-1016 M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass







Total PCB* M15-No21851 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD

TRH >C10-C16 M15-No20317 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass



Duplicate

Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Chromium (hexavalent) M15-No21755 NCP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Cyanide (total) M15-No21849 NCP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

Fluoride M15-No21760 NCP mg/kg 150 130 14 30% Pass

Duplicate

Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Chromium M15-No20317 NCP mg/kg 17 17 1.0 30% Pass

Duplicate

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Acenaphthene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 1.1 1.1 3.0 30% Pass

Anthracene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 1.5 1.9 29 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 4.4 4.8 9.0 30% Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 5.5 6.1 10 30% Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 5.3 5.7 8.0 30% Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 3.7 3.7 2.0 30% Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 3.8 4.5 16 30% Pass




Page 17 of 20


of 282

Duplicate


Chrysene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 3.9 4.5 13 30% Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 1.1 1.2 5.0 30% Pass

Fluoranthene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 8.1 9.0 11 30% Pass

Fluorene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.5 0.6 9.0 30% Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 3.3 3.5 5.0 30% Pass

Naphthalene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 5.3 6.3 17 30% Pass

Pyrene M15-No21773 CP mg/kg 6.8 7.8 14 30% Pass

Duplicate

Phenols (Halogenated) Result 1 Result 2 RPD

2-Chlorophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

2.4-Dichlorophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

2.4.5-Trichlorophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

2.4.6-Trichlorophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

2.6-Dichlorophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Pentachlorophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Tetrachlorophenols - Total M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Phenols (non-Halogenated) Result 1 Result 2 RPD

2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-dinitrophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass

2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

2-Nitrophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

2.4-Dimethylphenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

2.4-Dinitrophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass

4-Nitrophenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

Dinoseb M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass

Phenol M15-No21773 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


% Moisture M15-No21773 CP % 9.3 8.7 7.0 30% Pass

Duplicate


Chloride M15-No21774 CP mg/kg 27 29 9.0 30% Pass

Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extractat 25°C) M15-No21774 CP uS/cm 81 82 1.0 30% Pass

pH (1:5 Aqueous extract) M15-No21774 CP pH Units 7.7 7.5 pass 30% Pass

pH (units)(1:5 soil:CaCl2 extract) M15-No21774 CP pH Units 7.0 7.0 pass 30% Pass

Sulphate (as S) M15-No21774 CP mg/kg < 10 < 10 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


Nitrate (as N) M15-No21776 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


Arsenic M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 4.6 5.9 25 30% Pass

Beryllium M15-No21778 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Boron M15-No21778 CP mg/kg < 10 < 10 <1 30% Pass

Cadmium M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 0.9 1.2 34 30% Fail Q15

Cobalt M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 11 8.0 30 30% Pass

Copper M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 61 72 16 30% Pass

Lead M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 1000 1000 1.0 30% Pass

Manganese M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 360 360 1.0 30% Pass




Page 18 of 20


of 282

Duplicate


Mercury M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 0.5 0.5 8.0 30% Pass

Molybdenum M15-No21778 CP mg/kg < 10 < 10 <1 30% Pass

Nickel M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 32 26 21 30% Pass

Selenium M15-No21778 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Silver M15-No21778 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

Tin M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 38 43 13 30% Pass

Vanadium M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 24 29 18 30% Pass

Zinc M15-No21778 CP mg/kg 1100 1200 8.0 30% Pass

Duplicate


Lead M15-No21779 CP mg/kg 830 840 1.0 30% Pass

Mercury M15-No21779 CP mg/kg 0.2 0.2 10 30% Pass

Zinc M15-No21779 CP mg/kg 860 890 4.0 30% Pass




Page 19 of 20


of 282

Comments

Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A

Attempt to Chill was evident Yes

Sample correctly preserved Yes

Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes

Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes

Samples received within HoldingTime Yes

Some samples have been subcontracted No

Qualifier Codes/Comments

Code DescriptionM10 NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service in soil matrices

N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).

N02

Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.

N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.

N07Please note:- These two PAH isomers closely co-elute using the most contemporary analytical methods and both the reported concentration (and the TEQ) apply specifically tothe total of the two co-eluting PAHs

Q15 The RPD reported passes Eurofins | mgt's QC - Acceptance Criteria as defined in the Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary page of this report.

Authorised By

Onur Mehmet Analytical Services Manager

Carroll Lee Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC)

Carroll Lee Senior Analyst-Volatile (VIC)

Emily Rosenberg Senior Analyst-Metal (VIC)

Huong Le Senior Analyst-Inorganic (VIC)

Richard Corner Senior Analyst-Inorganic (QLD)

Glenn Jackson

National Operations Manager

- Indicates Not Requested

* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service

Uncertainty data is available on requestEurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but notlimited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.




Page 20 of 20


of 282



4 Allee Street

Brighton

VIC 3186


Report 480951-W

Project name 15029


Client Sample ID RB1-25.11.15 TB1-25.11.15

Sample Matrix Water Water

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M15-No21781 M15-No21782

Date Sampled Nov 25, 2015 Nov 25, 2015



Acenaphthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Acenaphthylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Benz(a)anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Chrysene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Fluoranthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Fluorene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Naphthalene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Phenanthrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

Total PAH* 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 84 65

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 92 72




Page 1 of 8

Report Number: 480951-W



of 282




Vic EPA IWRG 621 (Solids)






Page 2 of 8


of 282

.Company Name: Environmental Assessment Serv Order No.: Received: Nov 26, 2015 6:02 PMAddress: 4 Allee Street Report #: 480951 Due: Dec 4, 2015


Project Name: 15029


Sample Detail

Chloride

HO

LD

Molybdenum

Nitrate (as N

)

pH (1:5 A

queous extract)

Silver

Sulphate (as S

)

Tin

Vanadium

Polycyclic A

romatic H

ydrocarbons

NE

PM

2013 Metals : M

etals M13

Halogenated V

olatile Organics

Moisture S

et

NE

PM

Screen for S

oil Classification

Vic E

PA

IWR

G 621 (S

olids)





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID


BH01/0.2 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21773 X X

BH01/0.5 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21774 X X X X X

BH02/0.05 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21775 X X X X X X X X X X X

BH02/0.9 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21776 X X

BH03/0.1 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21777 X X X X X X X X


BH05/0.05 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21779 X X X X X X X

BR1-25.11.15 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21780 X X

RB1-25.11.15 Nov 25, 2015 Water M15-No21781 X








Page 3 of 8


of 282

Company Name: Environmental Assessment Serv Order No.: Received: Nov 26, 2015 6:02 PMAddress: 4 Allee Street Report #: 480951 Due: Dec 4, 2015


Project Name: 15029


Sample Detail

Chloride

HO

LD

Molybdenum

Nitrate (as N

)

pH (1:5 A

queous extract)

Silver

Sulphate (as S

)

Tin

Vanadium

Polycyclic A

romatic H

ydrocarbons

NE

PM

2013 Metals : M

etals M13

Halogenated V

olatile Organics

Moisture S

et

NE

PM

Screen for S

oil Classification

Vic E

PA

IWR

G 621 (S

olids)





External Laboratory

TB1-25.11.15 Nov 25, 2015 Water M15-No21782 X

BH01/0.9 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21783 X

BH02/0.3 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21784 X

BH03/0.35 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21785 X

BH04/0.4 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21786 X

BH04/0.9 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21787 X

BH05/0.3 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21788 X

BH05/0.6 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-No21789 X








Page 4 of 8


of 282


General

Holding Times

Units

Terms




request.








Receipt Advice.




















































Page 5 of 8


of 282



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank


Acenaphthene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Acenaphthylene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Anthracene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Chrysene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Fluoranthene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Fluorene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Naphthalene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Phenanthrene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Pyrene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

LCS - % Recovery



















LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1

Acenaphthene M15-No22584 NCP % 83 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene M15-No22584 NCP % 86 70-130 Pass

Anthracene M15-No22584 NCP % 93 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M15-No22584 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M15-No22584 NCP % 96 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M15-No22584 NCP % 114 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M15-No22584 NCP % 79 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M15-No22584 NCP % 99 70-130 Pass

Chrysene M15-No22584 NCP % 98 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M15-No22584 NCP % 103 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene M15-No22584 NCP % 98 70-130 Pass

Fluorene M15-No22584 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass




Page 6 of 8


of 282


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M15-No22584 NCP % 96 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene M15-No22584 NCP % 80 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene M15-No22584 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

Pyrene M15-No22584 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate


Acenaphthene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Anthracene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Chrysene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Fluoranthene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Fluorene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Naphthalene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Pyrene M15-No23617 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass




Page 7 of 8


of 282

Comments









Code Description


Authorised By



Glenn Jackson








Page 8 of 8


of 282



4 Allee Street

Brighton

VIC 3186


Report 482203-S

Project name 15029

Received Date Dec 03, 2015



Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M15-De04801 M15-De04802 M15-De04803 M15-De04804




Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 3.5 3.6 < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 3.8 3.8 0.6

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 4.0 4.1 1.2

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 0.8 0.5 < 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 2.4 2.5 < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 2.7 2.8 < 0.5

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 2.0 1.9 < 0.5

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 1.5 1.3 < 0.5

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 2.0 1.8 < 0.5

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 2.0 2.1 < 0.5

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 4.5 5.1 < 0.5

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 1.5 1.3 < 0.5

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 2.4 1.7 < 0.5

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 3.9 4.8 < 0.5

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 26 26 < 0.5

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 100 91 96 101

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 106 96 105 106

Heavy Metals

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 - - -

Lead 5 mg/kg 16 - 19 7.0

Zinc 5 mg/kg 30 200 120 11

% Moisture 0.1 % 13 11 16 15




Page 1 of 8




of 282

Client Sample ID BH05/0.6

Sample Matrix Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M15-De04805




Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2


Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5



Heavy Metals

Lead 5 mg/kg 6.9

Zinc 5 mg/kg 9.5

% Moisture 0.1 % 16




Page 2 of 8


of 282




Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Melbourne Dec 04, 2015 14 Day


Heavy Metals Melbourne Dec 04, 2015 180 Day


% Moisture Melbourne Dec 04, 2015 14 Day





Page 3 of 8


of 282

.Company Name: Environmental Assessment Serv Order No.: Received: Dec 3, 2015 5:10 PMAddress: 4 Allee Street Report #: 482203 Due: Dec 10, 2015


Project Name: 15029


Sample Detail

Cadm

ium

Lead

Reverse H

OLD

Charge

Zinc

Polycyclic A

romatic H

ydrocarbons

AU

S Leaching P

rocedure

Moisture S

et


Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X X X X


Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794

External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID

BH01/0.5 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-De04801 X X X X X

BH02/0.9 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-De04802 X X X




BH01/0.05 Nov 25, 2015 ASLP M15-De04806 X X X X X

BH02/0.05 Nov 25, 2015 ASLP M15-De04807 X X X

BH03/0.1 Nov 25, 2015 ASLP M15-De04808 X X X X










Page 4 of 8


of 282


General

Holding Times

Units

Terms




request.








Receipt Advice.




















































Page 5 of 8


of 282



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank


















Method Blank

Heavy Metals

Cadmium mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass

Lead mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Zinc mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


















LCS - % Recovery

Heavy Metals

Cadmium % 98 80-120 Pass

Lead % 103 80-120 Pass

Zinc % 102 80-120 Pass




Page 6 of 8


of 282


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery


Acenaphthene M15-De02689 NCP % 78 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene M15-De02689 NCP % 79 70-130 Pass

Anthracene M15-De02689 NCP % 85 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M15-De02689 NCP % 79 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M15-De02689 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M15-De02689 NCP % 72 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M15-De02689 NCP % 71 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M15-De02689 NCP % 81 70-130 Pass

Chrysene M15-De02689 NCP % 82 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M15-De02689 NCP % 85 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene M15-De02689 NCP % 76 70-130 Pass

Fluorene M15-De02689 NCP % 82 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M15-De02689 NCP % 85 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene M15-De02689 NCP % 74 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene M15-De02689 NCP % 77 70-130 Pass

Pyrene M15-De02689 NCP % 72 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Cadmium M15-De02741 NCP % 76 75-125 Pass

Lead M15-De02741 NCP % 78 75-125 Pass

Zinc M15-De02741 NCP % 75 75-125 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate


Acenaphthene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Anthracene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 0.7 < 0.5 55 30% Fail Q15

Benzo(a)pyrene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 0.8 0.6 34 30% Fail Q15

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 0.8 < 0.5 75 30% Fail Q15

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 0.5 < 0.5 44 30% Fail Q15

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 0.8 < 0.5 60 30% Fail Q15

Chrysene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 0.7 < 0.5 49 30% Fail Q15

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Fluoranthene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 1.3 0.7 61 30% Fail Q15

Fluorene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 0.5 < 0.5 48 30% Fail Q15

Naphthalene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 0.7 < 0.5 96 30% Fail Q15

Pyrene M15-De02658 NCP mg/kg 1.2 0.7 56 30% Fail Q15

Duplicate


Cadmium M15-De03774 NCP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass

Lead M15-De03774 NCP mg/kg 170 180 7.0 30% Pass

Zinc M15-De03774 NCP mg/kg 38 49 26 30% Pass

Duplicate


% Moisture M15-De04805 CP % 16 16 3.0 30% Pass




Page 7 of 8


of 282

Comments









Code Description


Q15 The RPD reported passes Eurofins | mgt's QC - Acceptance Criteria as defined in the Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary page of this report.

Authorised By




Mele Singh Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC)

Glenn Jackson








Page 8 of 8


of 282



4 Allee Street

Brighton

VIC 3186


Report 482203-L

Project name 15029

Received Date Dec 03, 2015


Sample Matrix ASLP ASLP ASLP ASLP

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M15-De04806 M15-De04807 M15-De04808 M15-De04809




Acenaphthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Acenaphthylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Benz(a)anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Chrysene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Fluoranthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Fluorene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Naphthalene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Phenanthrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Total PAH* 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 74 77 78 77

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 96 104 109 113

Heavy Metals

Cadmium 0.005 mg/L < 0.005 - - -

Lead 0.01 mg/L 0.10 - 0.12 0.20

Zinc 0.01 mg/L 4.6 2.4 1.7 2.1

AUS Leaching Procedure

Leachate FluidC01 comment 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

pH (initial) 0.1 pH Units 8.6 9.1 9.2 8.8

pH (Leachate fluid) 0.1 pH Units 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

pH (off) 0.1 pH Units 5.2 5.2 5.7 5.2




Page 1 of 8

Report Number: 482203-L



of 282

Client Sample ID BH05/0.05

Sample Matrix ASLP

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M15-De04810




Acenaphthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Acenaphthylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benz(a)anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Chrysene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Fluoranthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Fluorene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Naphthalene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Phenanthrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Total PAH* 0.001 mg/L < 0.001



Heavy Metals

Lead 0.01 mg/L 0.15

Zinc 0.01 mg/L 1.6

AUS Leaching Procedure

Leachate FluidC01 comment 1.0

pH (initial) 0.1 pH Units 8.9

pH (Leachate fluid) 0.1 pH Units 5.0

pH (off) 0.1 pH Units 5.1




Page 2 of 8


of 282




Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Melbourne Dec 08, 2015 7 Day


Heavy Metals Melbourne Dec 04, 2015 180 Day


AUS Leaching Procedure Melbourne Dec 04, 2015 7 Day

- Method: LTM-GEN-7010




Page 3 of 8


of 282

.Company Name: Environmental Assessment Serv Order No.: Received: Dec 3, 2015 5:10 PMAddress: 4 Allee Street Report #: 482203 Due: Dec 10, 2015


Project Name: 15029


Sample Detail

Cadm

ium

Lead

Reverse H

OLD

Charge

Zinc

Polycyclic A

romatic H

ydrocarbons

AU

S Leaching P

rocedure

Moisture S

et


Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X X X X



External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID


BH02/0.9 Nov 25, 2015 Soil M15-De04802 X X X




BH01/0.05 Nov 25, 2015 ASLP M15-De04806 X X X X X

BH02/0.05 Nov 25, 2015 ASLP M15-De04807 X X X











Page 4 of 8


of 282


General

Holding Times

Units

Terms




request.








Receipt Advice.




















































Page 5 of 8


of 282



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank

Heavy Metals

Cadmium mg/L < 0.005 0.005 Pass

Lead mg/L < 0.01 0.01 Pass

Zinc mg/L < 0.01 0.01 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery


Zinc M15-De03838 NCP % 104 75-125 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Cadmium M15-De04807 CP % 110 75-125 Pass

Lead M15-De04807 CP % 109 75-125 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Acenaphthene M15-De04810 CP % 75 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene M15-De04810 CP % 85 70-130 Pass

Anthracene M15-De04810 CP % 71 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M15-De04810 CP % 83 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M15-De04810 CP % 75 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M15-De04810 CP % 78 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M15-De04810 CP % 113 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M15-De04810 CP % 80 70-130 Pass

Chrysene M15-De04810 CP % 86 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M15-De04810 CP % 115 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene M15-De04810 CP % 70 70-130 Pass

Fluorene M15-De04810 CP % 80 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M15-De04810 CP % 114 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene M15-De04810 CP % 82 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene M15-De04810 CP % 73 70-130 Pass

Pyrene M15-De04810 CP % 71 70-130 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate


Cadmium M15-De04807 CP mg/L < 0.005 < 0.005 <1 30% Pass

Lead M15-De04807 CP mg/L 0.04 0.04 8.0 30% Pass

Zinc M15-De04807 CP mg/L 2.4 2.2 10 30% Pass

Duplicate


Acenaphthene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Anthracene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Chrysene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Fluoranthene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Fluorene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass




Page 6 of 8


of 282

Duplicate


Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Naphthalene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Pyrene M15-De04809 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass




Page 7 of 8


of 282

Comments









Code DescriptionC01 Leachate Fluid Key: 1 - pH 5.0; 2 - pH 2.9; 3 - pH 9.2; 4 - Reagent (DI) water; 5 - Client sample, 6 - other


Authorised By



Mele Singh Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC)

Glenn Jackson








Page 8 of 8


of 282

2 2.00 True

Environmental

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISWork Order : Page : 1 of 3EM1517636

:: LaboratoryClient ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES PTY LTD Environmental Division Melbourne

: :ContactContact MR TONY CONNOLLY

:: AddressAddress 30 WILLIAM ST

BRIGHTON VIC 3186

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected]

:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 9503 0107 +61-3-8549 9600

:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 9503 0156 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 15029 QC Level : NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard

:Order number ---- Date Samples Received : 26-Nov-2015 08:40

:C-O-C number 15101 Date Analysis Commenced : 27-Nov-2015

Sampler : ---- Issue Date : 01-Dec-2015 12:31

Site : ----

1:No. of samples received

Quote number : ---- 1:No. of samples analysed

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted.

This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:

l General Comments

l Analytical Results

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been

carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.

Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Chris Lemaitre Non-Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics

Xing Lin Senior Organic Chemist Melbourne Organics

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825

Accredited for compliance with

ISO/IEC 17025.

R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R

of 282

True

Environmental

QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality ReviewWork Order : EM1517636 Page : 1 of 4

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES PTY LTD

:Contact MR TONY CONNOLLY Telephone : +61-3-8549 9600

:Project 15029 Date Samples Received : 26-Nov-2015

Site : ---- Issue Date : 01-Dec-2015

----:Sampler No. of samples received : 1

:Order number ---- No. of samples analysed : 1

This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated

reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this

report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance.

Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability.

Summary of Outliers

Outliers : Quality Control Samples

This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report.

l NO Method Blank value outliers occur.

l NO Duplicate outliers occur.

l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur.

l NO Matrix Spike outliers occur.

l For all regular sample matrices, NO surrogate recovery outliers occur.

Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance

l NO Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist.

Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples

l NO Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.


of 282

2 of 4:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1517636

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES PTY LTD

15029:Project

This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container

provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.

Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics

14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.

Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and

should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.

Analysis Holding Time Compliance

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.

AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EA055: Moisture Content

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA055-103)

BH01/0.05 (SPLIT) 09-Dec-2015---- 27-Nov-2015----25-Nov-2015 ---- üEP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP075(SIM))

BH01/0.05 (SPLIT) 09-Jan-201609-Dec-2015 30-Nov-201530-Nov-201525-Nov-2015 ü ü

of 282

3 of 4:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1517636


15029:Project

Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to

the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.

Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type

ExpectedQC Regular Actual

Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method

Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)

NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üMoisture Content EA055-103

NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 10.001 6 üPAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM)

Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)


Method Blanks (MB)


Matrix Spikes (MS)


of 282

4 of 4:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1517636


15029:Project

Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house

developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the

Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.

Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

In-house. A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 103-105 degrees C.

This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Section 7.1 and Table 1 (14 day holding time).

Moisture Content EA055-103 SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 8270B) Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in Selective Ion Mode (SIM) and

quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with

NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 502 and 507)

PAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM) SOIL

Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

In-house, Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 30mL 1:1

DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the

desired volume for analysis.

Tumbler Extraction of Solids ORG17 SOIL

of 282

False 2 2.00True

Environmental

QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EM1517636 Page : 1 of 4

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES PTY LTD

:Contact MR TONY CONNOLLY :Contact

:Address 30 WILLIAM ST

BRIGHTON VIC 3186

Address : 4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected]

::Telephone +61 03 9503 0107 +61-3-8549 9600:Telephone

:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 9503 0156 +61-3-8549 9601

QC Level : NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard:Project 15029

Date Samples Received : 26-Nov-2015:Order number ----

Date Analysis Commenced : 27-Nov-2015:C-O-C number 15101

Issue Date : 01-Dec-2015Sampler : ----

No. of samples received 1:Site : ----

No. of samples analysed 1:Quote number : ----

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted.

This Quality Control Report contains the following information:

l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits

l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

l Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been carried out in

compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.

Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Chris Lemaitre Non-Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics

Xing Lin Senior Organic Chemist Melbourne Organics

NATA Accredited

Laboratory 825

Accredited for

compliance with

ISO/IEC 17025.


of 282

2 of 4:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1517636


15029:Project

General Comments

The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house

developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot

CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.

LOR = Limit of reporting

RPD = Relative Percentage Difference

# = Indicates failed QC

Key :

of 282

3 of 4:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1517636


15029:Project

Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges

for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:

No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR:- 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR:0% - 20%.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 291899)

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1 % 20.8 21.3 2.53 0% - 20%Anonymous EM1517625-009

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1 % 20.0 17.9 11.2 0% - 20%Anonymous EM1517625-033

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 293559)

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1517593-001

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2

205-82-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

of 282

4 of 4:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1517636


15029:Project

Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC

parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target

analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB)

Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 293559)

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1053 mg/kg 11468

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1073 mg/kg 12561

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1103 mg/kg 11668

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1053 mg/kg 11662

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1013 mg/kg 11464

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2

205-82-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 96.63 mg/kg 11464

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 82.53 mg/kg 11759

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1093 mg/kg 11567

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1143 mg/kg 11963

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 85.03 mg/kg 11462

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1123 mg/kg 11567

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1063 mg/kg 12062

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 85.73 mg/kg 11662

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 95.03 mg/kg 11965

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1103 mg/kg 11369

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1123 mg/kg 11666

Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on

analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report

SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike

HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 293559)

Anonymous EM1517593-005 83-32-9EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 86.73 mg/kg 11767

129-00-0EP075(SIM): Pyrene 1113 mg/kg 14852

of 282

2 of 3:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1517636

15029:Project


General Comments

The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house

developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.

CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.

LOR = Limit of reporting

^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting

ø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.

Key :

Benzo(a)pyrene Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) is the sum total of the concentration of the eight carcinogenic PAHs multiplied by their Toxicity Equivalence Factor (TEF) relative to Benzo(a)pyrene. TEF values

are provided in brackets as follows: Benz(a)anthracene (0.1), Chrysene (0.01), Benzo(b+j) & Benzo(k)fluoranthene (0.1), Benzo(a)pyrene (1.0), Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene (0.1), Dibenz(a.h)anthracene (1.0),

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene (0.01). Less than LOR results for 'TEQ Zero' are treated as zero, for 'TEQ 1/2LOR' are treated as half the reported LOR, and for 'TEQ LOR' are treated as being equal to the reported LOR.

Note: TEQ 1/2LOR and TEQ LOR will calculate as 0.6mg/Kg and 1.2mg/Kg respectively for samples with non-detects for all of the eight TEQ PAHs.

l

of 282

3 of 3:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1517636

15029:Project


Analytical Results

----------------BH01/0.05 (SPLIT)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

(Matrix: SOIL)

----------------[25-Nov-2015]Client sampling date / time

--------------------------------EM1517636-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

Result Result Result Result Result

EA055: Moisture Content

11.8 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons

<0.5Naphthalene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3

0.8Acenaphthylene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8

<0.5Acenaphthene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9

<0.5Fluorene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7

3.8Phenanthrene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8

1.5Anthracene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7

8.0Fluoranthene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0

7.5Pyrene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0

4.1Benz(a)anthracene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3

3.6Chrysene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9

5.6Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2 205-82-3

2.5Benzo(k)fluoranthene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9

5.0Benzo(a)pyrene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8

3.0Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5

0.8Dibenz(a.h)anthracene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3

3.6Benzo(g.h.i)perylene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2

49.8^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

7.4^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (zero)

7.4^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (half LOR)

7.4^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (LOR)

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates

89.0Phenol-d6 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.513127-88-3

92.42-Chlorophenol-D4 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.593951-73-6

83.42.4.6-Tribromophenol ---- ---- ---- ----%0.5118-79-6

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates

97.92-Fluorobiphenyl ---- ---- ---- ----%0.5321-60-8

113Anthracene-d10 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.51719-06-8

99.14-Terphenyl-d14 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.51718-51-0

of 282

of 282


MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne3-5 Kingston Town CloseOakleigh Vic 3166Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271



Environmental LaboratoryAir AnalysisWater AnalysisSoil Contamination Analysis

NATA AccreditationStack Emission Sampling & AnalysisTrade Waste Sampling & AnalysisGroundwater Sampling & Analysis

38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience

Sample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt Advice

Company name: Environmental Assessment ServEnvironmental Assessment ServEnvironmental Assessment ServEnvironmental Assessment Serv

Contact name: Tony ConnollyProject name: 15029COC number: 15101Turn around time: 5 DayDate/Time received: Nov 26, 2015 6:02 PMEurofins | mgt reference: 480951480951480951480951

Sample informationSample informationSample informationSample information

☑ A detailed list of analytes logged into our LIMS, is included in the attached summary table.

☑ Sample Temperature of a random sample selected from the batch as recorded by Eurofins | mgtSample Receipt : 24 degrees Celsius.

☑ All samples have been received as described on the above COC.

☑ COC has been completed correctly.

☑ Attempt to chill was evident.

☑ Appropriately preserved sample containers have been used.

☑ All samples were received in good condition.

☑ Samples have been provided with adequate time to commence analysis in accordance with therelevant holding times.

☑ Appropriate sample containers have been used.

☑ Sample containers for volatile analysis received with zero headspace.

☒ Some samples have been subcontracted.

N/A Custody Seals intact (if used).

Contact notesContact notesContact notesContact notes

If you have any questions with respect to these samples please contact:

Onur Mehmet on Phone : (+61) (3) 8564 5026 or by e.mail: [email protected]

Results will be delivered electronically via e.mail to Tony Connolly - [email protected].

of 282

of 282









Company name: Environmental Assessment ServEnvironmental Assessment ServEnvironmental Assessment ServEnvironmental Assessment Serv

Contact name: Tony ConnollyProject name: 15029COC number: Not providedTurn around time: 5 DayDate/Time received: Dec 3, 2015 5:10 PMEurofins | mgt reference: 482203482203482203482203














Onur Mehmet on Phone : (+61) (3) 8564 5026 or by e.mail: [email protected]

Results will be delivered electronically via e.mail to Tony Connolly - [email protected].

of 282

Appendix S

Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd

Human Health Risk Appraisal

of 282

1 | P a g e

10 February 2016

Jenny Yuen 25 John Street Clifton Hill Vic 3068 CC: Tony Connolly Environmental Assessment Services Pty Ltd 30 William Street Brighton VIC 3186

Re: Risk Appraisal – 25 John Street, Clifton Hill, Victoria

1.0 Introduction Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd (enRiskS) has been commissioned to conduct a risk appraisal in relation to the presence of contamination identified in soil at the property located at 25 John Street, Clifton Hill, Victoria (“the site”).

The site is affected by an Environmental Audit Overlay which means an audit is required for any works at the site. An extension to the current terrace building is being proposed. The history of the site has been investigated and appears to indicate that the Overlay is in place at this site as it is in a buffer around other sites that may be contaminated rather than any expectation that this site, in particular, has been subject to contamination.

Investigation of soil contamination has been undertaken at the site. The investigation found a number of contaminants common in soil in Melbourne due to the historical use of fill including lead and PAHs to be present at levels requiring further evaluation.

The site is currently used for low density residential purposes and this is not proposed to change. The development at the site proposes to extend the current building leaving less access to soil at the site than is currently possible (see Appendix A).

This appraisal of risks from contamination present at the site is being undertaken to confirm the suitability of the site for the proposed development.

2.0 Objectives The objectives of the risk appraisal presented in this letter are:

To conduct an on-site risk appraisal to quantify potential risks to human health associated with the presence of contamination that remains beneath the site, based on the proposed development plans;

On the basis of the appraisal, identify if any additional risk management measures may be required.

The risk appraisal will address on-site human health risk issues associated with the proposed development (as provided in the development plans). The assessment will not address off-site human health risks, nor any environmental risk issues.

Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd PO Box 2537 Carlingford Court NSW 2118 Phone: +61 2 9614 0297 Fax: +61 2 8215 0657 Email: [email protected] [email protected] www.enrisks.com.au

of 282

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.enrisks.com.au/

2 | P a g e

3.0 Methodology The approach taken for the quantitative assessment of human health risks is in accordance with guidelines/protocols endorsed by Australian regulators, including:

enHealth (2012a) Environmental Health Risk Assessment, Guidelines for Assessing Human Health Risks from Environmental Hazards (enHealth 2012a)

enHealth (2012b) Australian Exposure Factor Guide (enHealth 2012b) NEPM (1999 amended 2013) National Environmental Protection Measure – Assessment of Site

Contamination including: o Schedule B1 Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (NEPC 1999 amended 2013a) o Schedule B4 Guideline on Health Risk Assessment Methodology (NEPC 1999 amended

2013b) o Schedule B7 Guideline on Health-Based Investigation Levels (NEPC 1999 amended 2013c)

The above documents draw on and reference more detailed protocols and guidelines developed by international agencies such as the USEPA (USEPA 1989, 1996, 2002, 2004, 2009). These documents have also been consulted to provide supplementary guidance, where required.

4.0 Site Identification and History Site identification details are provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Site Identification Details

Parameter Site Identification Description Address 25 John Street, Clifton Hill Local Council Yarra City Council Title Information Volume: 08943 Folio: 219 Surface Area Approximately 140 m2 Planning Zone Mixed use zone (MUZ) Planning Overlay Environmental Audit Overlay (EAO)

Heritage overlay (HO) Current Use Site is currently occupied by a two storey brick house with residential occupants Priority Site Registry

The priority sites register extract indicates that the site nor sites within the vicinity of the site are registered.

The current site description and layout includes:

An elongated rectangular parcel of land. One double storey brick house occupies the majority of the site. A small landscaped garden is present along the John Street frontage. At the rear of the house is a backyard with vegetation, garden area and paving. The site is flat with no distinct slope Access is gained from John Street to the west.

Figure 1 shows the site layout.

of 282

3 | P a g e

Figure 1 Site Layout

of 282

4 | P a g e

Surrounding land uses include:

Standard-density residential premises to the north. Relatively recently constructed double storey high-density residential premises to the east. Standard-density residential premises to the south. Over John Street is Clifton Hill Railway station to the west of the site.

The terrace house that exists at the site was constructed around 1890. It forms part of a set of seven terrace houses. A review of the site history indicates that the property has been used for residential purposes since that time. At locations around the site a variety of commercial and industrial facilities can be seen in the historical photographs including a railway line, tennis courts, parkland and some larger buildings.

5.0 Conceptual Site Model

5.1 Geology/Hydrogeology

The “Melbourne” 1:63,360 map indicates that the site is underlain Quaternary Newer Volcanics basalt. A review of nearby completed audit sites indicates that the uppermost aquifer system resides in the underlying Silurian Age Dargile Formation. Bore logs are included in Appendix B. The bore logs collected during soil sampling show that there is 0.5-0.9 m of fill material at the site underlain by firm clays.

The closest surface water body is Merri Creek, located approximately 320 metres to the north of the subject site. The Yarra River located approximately one kilometre to the south east.

A review of the Department of Environment Land, Water and Planning on-line Groundwater Resource Report indicated that groundwater occurs at 10 - 20 metres with total dissolved solids values considered to be in the range of 1001 – 3500 mg/L.

5.2 Sources of Contamination

The site has been used for residential purposes since the late 1800s. Consideration of potential sources of contamination is provided in Table 2.

Table 2 Potential Sources that might contribute to Site Contamination

Potential Source Potential Contaminants On-site

Imported fill Metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons, pH, sulfate

Building materials and paving Asbestos containing materials (i.e. cement sheeting) Off-site

Fuel merchant (2 Spensley St) Total petroleum hydrocarbons, monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and lead.

Steel equipment manufacturer (2 Spensley St)

Total petroleum hydrocarbons, monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and metals.

5.3 Nature and Extent of Soil Contamination

The site investigation has included the collection of soil samples from 5 locations across the site. Given the size of the site (140 m2) this is an appropriate number in accordance with AS4482.1. Soil sampling locations are shown in Figure 2. At each soil sampling location samples were collected at a number of depths – 2-3 depths at each location. Soil samples were analysed for metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds and organochlorine pesticides in line with normal requirements in Victoria.

of 282

5 | P a g e

Figure 2 Soil Sampling Locations

of 282

6 | P a g e

The available soil data has been reviewed with the aim of identifying chemicals of potential concern (CoPCs) relevant to the quantification of risks to human health. The review of available soil data has been undertaken to identify the following:

Whether the analyte detected is considered volatile1; and Whether the concentration reported exceeds available human health risk based investigation

levels, or screening guidelines. In relation to the review of soil concentrations, the following guidelines have been adopted:

o NEPM Health Based Investigation Levels. The NEPM (1999 amended 2013) provides risk-based Health Investigation Levels (HIL) and Health Screening Levels (HSLs) for selected organic and inorganic chemicals in soils. Different levels are provided for a variety of exposure settings including residential, open-space / parks / recreational and commercial / industrial land uses. The NEPM HILs and HSLs have been developed to be protective of human health and do not take into account environmental concerns (in line with the scope of this assessment). Soil results have been compared to NEPM Level A (low density residential) HILs and HSLs (NEPC 1999 amended 2013a).

o USEPA Screening Levels (USEPA RSLs), 2015. Where no guideline value was available from the above sources, the USEPA RSLs have been used – for residential soil (assuming HI of 1 for non-carcinogenic effects and 1x10-5 for carcinogenic effects). The RSLs are conservative, human health risk-based values for soil, tap water and air. It should be noted that the RSLs are currently not recognised in Australia. However, the RSLs have been used in this assessment to provide a screening level for the purpose of identifying contaminants that may be at levels that could be of concern (USEPA 2015).

Table 3 presents a summary of the maximum soil concentrations that remain on the site with review against the above criteria. Only those chemicals detected in at least one sample have been included in this table. In addition, the locations of these maximum concentrations have been listed.

Table 3 Screening level risk assessment – soil data

Chemicals Maximum Concentration

(mg/kg)

Sampling Location

Screening Criteria (mg/kg)

Volatile (Y/N?)

CoPC (Y/N?)

Naphthalene 1.2 BH02 0.05 m 3 N Y N Acenaphthylene 2.8 BH02 0.05 m 3600 US N N Anthracene 4.7 BH02 0.05 m 18000 U N N Fluorene 1.9 BH02 0.05 m 2400 U N N Phenanthrene 17 BH02 0.05 m 1800 US N N Fluoranthene 22 BH02 0.05 m 2400 U N N Pyrene 18 BH02 0.05 m 1800 U N N Benzo[a]anthracene 11 BH02 0.05 m See BaP TEQs N -- Chrysene 9.2 BH02 0.05 m See BaP TEQs N -- Benzo[bk]fluoranthene 8 BH02 0.05 m See BaP TEQs N -- Benzo[a]pyrene 13 BH03 0.1 m See BaP TEQs N -- Indeno[123cd]pyrene 5.9 BH03 0.1 m See BaP TEQs N -- Dibenzo[ah]anthracene 2 BH02 0.05 m See BaP TEQs N -- Benzo[ghi]perylene 6 BH03 0.1 m See BaP TEQs N -- Benzo[a]pyrene TEQs 18.5 BH03 0.1 m 3 N N Y

Total PAHs 130 BH02 0.05 m 300 N N N Arsenic 16 BH01 0.05 m 100 N N N Cadmium 1.7 BH01 0.05 m 20 N N N Chromium 69 BH04 0.05 m 100 N N N

1 A chemical is considered sufficiently volatile if it has a Henry’s law constant greater than 1 x 10–5 atm m3/mol and the vapour pressure is greater than 1 mm Hg at room temperature (NEPM 1999 amended 2013 and DECCW 2010).

of 282

7 | P a g e

Chemicals Maximum Concentration

(mg/kg)

Sampling Location

Screening Criteria (mg/kg)

Volatile (Y/N?)

CoPC (Y/N?)

Cobalt 11 BH04 0.05 m 100 N N N Copper 91 BH01 0.05 m 6000 N N N Lead 1000 BH04 0.05 m 300 N N Y

Manganese 370 BH01 0.05 m 3800 N N N Mercury 0.5 BH04 0.05 m 40 N N N Nickel 32 BH04 0.05 m 400 N N N Tin 86 BH05 0.05 m 47000 U N N Vanadium 99 BH01 0.05 m 390 U N N Zinc 1700 BH01 0.05 m 7400 N N N DDT 0.06 BH01 0.05 m 240 N N N TRH >C16-C34 280 BH01 0.05 m 2500 M N N

Notes: N = NEPM HIL/HSL for residential soil and recreational soil M = NEPM Management Limit for TRH >C16-C34 fraction in coarse soil U = USEPA RSL for residential soil (HQ=1) as no NEPM HIL S = USEPA RSL for residential soil as no NEPM HIL for surrogate compound (acenaphthene for acenaphthylene and pyrene for

phenanthrene)

Based on the review presented in this screening assessment, carcinogenic PAHs (BaP TEQs) and lead have been identified as CoPCs requiring more detailed consideration.

6.0 Detailed Assessment – CoPCs

6.1 Lead

The most recent reviews of the toxicology of lead by WHO and USEPA have highlighted gaps in understanding and both organizations have withdrawn their toxicity reference values (see Appendix C). The assessment of the risk posed by lead can now only be undertaken using detailed blood lead modelling – the USEPA IEUBK model. However, there are few parameter values needed for this model that can be adjusted from those used in the development of the NEPM health investigation levels for low density residential sites. The values for the parameters used in the NEPM represent the best information available for such situations (enRiskS 2011; NEPC Toolbox 2014). The only value that can be adjusted is the value assumed for bioavailability/bioaccessibility of the lead in soil. Determining the bioaccessibility of the lead requires specialized analytical procedures not widely available and, depending on the source, may not be much different from that assumed in the NEPM calculations. As a result, management actions to prevent access to soil to minimise exposure to elevated levels are usually the best approach to limiting potential risks from exposure to lead.

The location with the highest lead concentration at this site is located in the front garden of the site but other sampling locations had similar levels. Lead is a common contaminant in historic fill used in Sydney and Melbourne. This fill was placed at the site prior to the construction of the building in the late 1800s so has been in place for more than 100 years. Additional sources of lead in inner city areas which may have added to surface concentrations particularly near buildings and close to roads include use of lead paint on the building and lead in petrol.

Currently, the building at the site covers approximately half the site surface (65 m2). The redevelopment proposed for this site includes the construction of extension on the house covering an additional 20 m2 of the site. The development plans indicate that the majority of the site that is not covered by the building will be paved. The remaining small amount of the site that may have accessible soil significantly reduces the potential for residents to come into contact with contaminated soil at the site.

of 282

8 | P a g e

Adding some additional clean fill onto the surface of the areas of the site where soil will remain accessible will minimise any ongoing exposure to lead in soil at the site.

Normal protective measures used during construction or intrusive maintenance such as wearing long sleeves, long pants and work boots will also be sufficient to minimise contact with the soil for workers involved in the redevelopment.

6.2 Carcinogenic PAHs (BaP TEQs)

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are often found in soil in urban areas, particularly the older suburbs in larger cities. PAHs exist naturally in the environment and are also man-made. PAHs are produced during combustion processes and, as a result, are present in ash materials from fireplaces and from more industrial uses such as coal fired boilers and waste from power generation (coal fired power plants). In addition, PAHs are also present in many urban materials including asphalt used in roadways, sealants used in homes and products such as oils and creosote (e.g. Creosote timber products in landscaping). PAHs are also present in vehicle exhaust.

The urbanisation of cities over time required the use of fill to level off low lying areas or fill in dips and hollows to make the area suitable for housing. In the past this often meant that waste from power stations was commonly used (e.g. Richmond, Spencer Street and Newport Power Stations (now decommissioned) were common sources in Melbourne). This fill contained ash materials that also included PAHs. Bitumen dust and sweepings from the construction and maintenance of urban roadways often ended up in soil in urban areas too. In addition, use of household products and the placement of ash from fireplaces in backyards all contribute to the PAHs concentrations commonly reported in urban soil.

PAH contamination in urban soil (derived from many of the above sources) is a common issue in suburbs in Sydney and Melbourne.

There are some areas where specific industries such as gasworks are located which produced large amounts of high level PAH contaminated materials and waste. Such contamination mostly remained at the location of manufacture and was not used in fill. Based on the site history collected for this site, there is no indication that it is located where a high level source of PAH contamination was located.

When undertaking an assessment of soil contamination at a property, soil samples are collected and sent to a laboratory for detailed analysis. The analysis of PAHs reports 16 of the most common PAHs that are found from many of the sources noted above. The concentrations that are reported in soil are then compared against Health Investigation Levels (HILs) for residential land-use. The HILs are established by the National Environment Protection Council (NEPC 1999 amended 2013c), and all of the state Health Ministers have agreed to these levels. The HILs are risk based values that indicate the need to undertake more work to understand the source, extent and potential for exposure to occur. The HILs are not a dividing line between a safe level and where health effects may occur. The HILs are specifically developed to be conservative criteria that provide a good margin of safety.

For the development of the HILs for PAHs in a residential area the following was assumed:

Residents live at a property from birth to the age of 35 years

As young children (aged 0-5 years) they play outside every day of the year, where they get around

44% of their body covered in dirt, which then stays on the skin for at least 24 hours. They also ingest

around 50 mg of soil. They also come in and out of the house regularly (and may have pets that also

come in and out of the house) so that the soil outside also comes inside as household dust where it

is assumed that the young child ingests another 50 mg of this dust every day of the year.

of 282

9 | P a g e

As older children and adults it is assumed that they are still at home every day of the year and still

access outside every day of the year. When outside it is assumed that around 30% of their whole

body gets covered in dirt, which stays on their skin for at least 24 hours. It is also assumed they

ingest around 25 mg soil. It is assumed that older children and adults come in and out of the home

regularly where they ingest another 25 mg of dust indoors every day.

It is also assumed that some dust from the soil on the property may also be present in the air

(generated from the wind) and that all children and adults inhale this dust all day, every day of the

year.

When exposed to PAHs as young children and older children, additional exposure factors have been

used to account for children being more susceptible to the carcinogenic effects associated with

exposure to some of the PAHs. This is done to ensure that the HIL is protective of all health effects,

even those that may be of greater significance for developing children.

For children and adults the PAHs they are exposed to in soil are assumed to be in a form that can

easily get into the body once exposed. So for the development of the HIL, 100% of the PAHs people

are exposed to, are assumed to be able to get into the body. However, for PAHs that come from

combustion sources such as ash and coal, or are present in bitumen, the PAHs are known to be well

bound to the soil so that even when people are exposed, very little of the PAH chemicals can come

off the soil and get into the body.

All the above assumptions mean that the residential HIL is very conservative for more typical/ common uses of residential properties.

The highest concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs at this site were reported for the shallow depth sample taken at BH02 and BH03. Both of these locations will be underneath the building once the redevelopment has been completed so will no longer be accessible by residents when making use of the outdoor area. Most other soil samples have 7-8 mg/kg present for carcinogenic PAHs – approximately half of the maximum values. The 95% upper confidence limit has been calculated for this data set using ProUCL5. This upper estimate of the average concentration at the site was calculated to be 9.7 mg/kg.

Calculations have been undertaken using more site specific parameter values to get a more realistic estimate of risk for this site. Given that the most contaminated locations will be covered by buildings after the redevelopment, an estimate of the average across the site is more relevant when considering long term exposures through normal use of a backyard. Consequently, the 95%UCL concentration has been used in the site specific risk calculations. The risk calculations and the ProUCL5 output are provided in Appendix D.

The site specific parameter values used in calculating risks to human health from exposure to soil at the site containing carcinogenic PAHs are provided in Table 4.

Table 4 Summary of Exposure Parameters Adopted

Exposure Parameter Value adopted for Child Resident Value adopted for Adult Resident Ingestion rate (soil) 100 mg/day of soil and dust assuming

time is spent outdoors and indoors on the site (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

50 mg/day of soil and dust assuming time is spent outdoors and indoors on the site (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

Skin surface area 2 700 cm2 based on the surface area for hands, legs, arms (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

6 300 cm2 based on the surface area for hands, legs, arms (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

Soil to skin adherence factor 0.5 (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013) 0.5 (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013) Fraction of day exposed 0.5 – assumes that the child remains dirty

for 12 hours 0.5 – assumes that the adult remains dirty for 12 hours

Exposure frequency 265 days per year assuming outdoor areas only accessed on dry days. The

265 days per year assuming outdoor areas only accessed on dry days. The average

of 282

10 | P a g e

Exposure Parameter Value adopted for Child Resident Value adopted for Adult Resident average number of days with rainfall over 1 mm is 100 per year (based on data from Melbourne Regional Met Station).

number of days with rainfall over 1 mm is 100 per year (based on data from Melbourne Regional Met Station).

Exposure duration 6 years as a young child (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

29 years as an adult assuming 35 years residency at the same location (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

Body weight 15kg (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013) 70 kg (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013) Exposure time 4 hours per day spent outdoors where

dust may be inhaled (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

4 hours per day spent outdoors where dust may be inhaled (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

Fraction inhaled 1 – assumes 100% of dust inhaled during a day will be dust from the outdoor area (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

1 – assumes 100% of dust inhaled during a day will be dust from the outdoor area (ASC NEPM 1999 amended 2013)

Appendix D provides the calculation spreadsheets used to estimate risks at the site from exposure via ingestion, dermal exposure and inhalation of dust for carcinogenic PAHs. The spreadsheets also include the equations used in calculating risk.

Table 5 presents a summary of the non-threshold risk for each pathway assessed and the total risk calculated for all exposures evaluated in relation to the proposed use of the site. The values presented in Table 5 (and all other risk calculations) are rounded to 1 or 2 significant figures reflecting the level of certainty/uncertainty inherent in risk calculations. Detailed calculations are presented in Appendix D.

Table 5 Summary of Risk

Receptor/Exposure Pathway Non-Threshold Risk Threshold Risk (HQ/HI)

Ingestion of PAHs in soil and dust - Young children - Adults

5x10-6

5x10-7

NA

Dermal contact with PAHs in soil and dust - Young children - Adults

2x10-6 2x10-6

NA

Inhalation of PAHs in dust - Young children - Adults

2x10-11

3x10-11

NA

Total Risk

- Young children

- Adults

- Lifetime

7x10-6

3x10-6

1x10-5

NA

Acceptable Risk ≤1x10-5 ≤1

Based on the risk estimates in Table 5, the risk posed by the presence of PAHs in soil at the site is low and acceptable.

6.3 Land SEPP

The Victorian Government has issued a State Environment Protection Policy in regard to contaminated land (Vic Govt 2002). This Policy indicates that beneficial uses of land for low density residential land include:

maintenance of natural ecosystems, modified ecosystems and highly modified ecosystems;

human health;

buildings and structures;

aesthetics; and

production of food, flora and fibre.

of 282

11 | P a g e

The potential risks in regard to most of these uses have been covered by the discussion above apart from production of food, flora and fibre. The most likely activity that includes the production of food or flora at the site would be if the resident at the site wanted to have a vegetable garden. This beneficial land use is not affected at this site because the contaminants identified as being of potential concern, namely lead and carcinogenic PAHs are not taken up into plants. Appendix A1 and A2 of Schedule B7 of the ASC NEPM provide detailed reviews of the potential of lead and carcinogenic PAHs to be taken into plants. In both cases the toxicity profiles indicate that the international literature notes that these chemicals are not readily taken up into roots or moved from the roots into the shoots of plants (NEPC 1999 amended 2013c). Consequently, it is not expected that the contamination found at the site would affect this land use.

Also the site is quite small and will be almost entirely covered by the building or paving which also limits the potential for a vegetable garden.

7.0 Conclusions Review of the available data in relation to the presence of contamination in soil that may be present beneath portions of the site located at 25 John Street in Clifton Hill, Victoria, has not identified any unacceptable risks to human health due to the presence of carcinogenic PAHs. The assessment is based on the proposed use of the site for ongoing low density residential purposes. Hence there are no requirements to undertake any risk management measures on the site in relation to carcinogenic PAHs.

In relation to the presence of lead in soil at the site, limitations exist in the international literature regarding the toxicology of lead and recommendations for acceptable exposure levels. Consequently, it is not possible to do a site specific risk assessment for lead. Given the concentrations of lead reported in some locations at the site some management of lead exposure is required. A layer of clean fill (0.1-0.2 m deep) laid over existing surface soils in the front yard and those areas in the back yard where accessible soils will remain is sufficient to limit exposure for residents. Applying such a layer will also limit exposure to other contaminants in the soil.

8.0 Limitations Environmental Risk Sciences has prepared this letter for the use of Jenny Yuen and Environmental Assessment Services Pty Ltd in accordance with the usual care and thoroughness of the consulting profession. It is based on generally accepted practices and standards at the time it was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this letter.

The methodology adopted and sources of information used are outlined in this letter. Environmental Risk Sciences has made no independent verification of this information beyond the agreed scope of works and assumes no responsibility for any inaccuracies or omissions.

This letter was prepared in January 2016 and is based on the information provided and reviewed at that time. Environmental Risk Sciences disclaims responsibility for any changes that may have occurred after this time.

This letter should be read in full. No responsibility is accepted for use of any part of this letter in any other context or for any other purpose or by third parties. This letter does not purport to give legal advice. Legal advice can only be given by qualified legal practitioners.

of 282

12 | P a g e

If you require any additional information or if you wish to discuss any aspect of this letter please do not hesitate to contact Therese on (02) 9614 0297.

Yours sincerely,

Therese Manning (Fellow ACTRA) Principal Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd

Jackie Wright (Fellow ACTRA) Principal/Director Environmental Risk Sciences Pty Ltd

of 282

13 | P a g e

8.0 References Abdel-Rahman, MS, Skowronski, GA & Turkal, RM 2002, 'Assessment of the dermal bioavailability of soil-aged benzo(a)pyrene', Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 8, pp. 429-441.

ATSDR 1995, Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), (Update), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

ATSDR 2007, Toxicological Profile for Lead, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. <http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp13.pdf>.

Baars, AJ, Theelen, RMC, Janssen, PJCM, Hesse, JM, Apeldorn, MEv, Meijerink, MCM, Verdam, L & Zeilmaker, MJ 2001, Re-evaluation of human-toxicological maximum permissible risk levels, RIVM.

CCME 2008, Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines, Carcinogenic and Other Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Environmental and Human Health Effects), Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.

CCME 2010, Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines, Carcinogenic and Other Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Environmental and Human Health Effects), Scientific Criteria Document (revised), Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Quebec.

CDC 2012, Low Level Lead Exposure Harms Children: A Renewed Call for Primary Prevention., Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA. <http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/acclpp/acclpp_main.htm>.

CEPA 1999, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines, Part II, Technical Support Document for Describing Available Cancer Potency Factors: benzo[a]pyrene, Californian Environmental Protection Agency.

enHealth 2012a, Environmental Health Risk Assessment, Guidelines for assessing human health risks from environmental hazards, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. <http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/804F8795BABFB1C7CA256F1900045479/$File/DoHA-EHRA-120910.pdf >.

enHealth 2012b, Australian Exposure Factors Guide, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. <http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-pubhlth-publicat-environ.htm>.

enRiskS 2011, IEUBK Modelling for Establishing HIL-A and Site-Specific Adjustments, Environmental Risk Sciences P/L. <http://www.enrisks.com.au/resources-view/ieubk-modelling-for-establishing-hil-a-and-conducting-site-specific-adjustments-to-the-model/>.

Fitzgerald, DJ 1991, Setting Response Levels for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) In: El Saadi, O & Langley, A (eds) The Health Risk Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites, , Contaminated Sites Monograph Series, South Australian Health Commission, Adelaide, Australia.

Fitzgerald, DJ 1998, The Benchmark Dose Approach and Health-Based Investigation Level for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) In: Langley, A, Imray, P, Lock, W & Hill, H. The Health Risk Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites, Contaminated Sites Monograph Series No. 7, South Australian Health Commission, Adelaide, Australia.

Fitzgerald, DJ, Robinson, NI & Pester, BA 2004, 'Application of Benzo(a)pyrene and Coal Tar Tumor Dose–Response Data to a Modified Benchmark Dose Method of Guideline Development', Environmental health perspectives, vol. 112, no. 14, pp. 1341-1346.

FSANZ 2003, The 20th Australian Total Diet Survey, Food Standards Australia and New Zealand. <http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx>.

FSANZ 2011, The 23rd Australian Total Diet Study, Food Standards Australia and New Zealand. <http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx>.

of 282

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp13.pdf%3e

http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/acclpp/acclpp_main.htm%3e

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/804F8795BABFB1C7CA256F1900045479/$File/DoHA-EHRA-120910.pdf

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/804F8795BABFB1C7CA256F1900045479/$File/DoHA-EHRA-120910.pdf

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-pubhlth-publicat-environ.htm%3e

http://www.enrisks.com.au/resources-view/ieubk-modelling-for-establishing-hil-a-and-conducting-site-specific-adjustments-to-the-model/%3e

http://www.enrisks.com.au/resources-view/ieubk-modelling-for-establishing-hil-a-and-conducting-site-specific-adjustments-to-the-model/%3e

http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx%3e

http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx%3e

14 | P a g e

IARC 2006, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 87, Inorganic and Organic Lead Compounds, World Health Organisation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

IARC 2010, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol 92. Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

MfE 2011, Toxicological intake values for priority contaminants in soil, New Zealand Ministry for the Environment, Wellington. <http://mfe.govt.nz/publications/hazards/toxicological-intake-values-priority-contaminants-soil>.

Moody, RP, Joncas, J, Richardson, M & Chu, I 2007, 'Contaminated soils (I): In vitro dermal absorption of benzo[a]pyrene in human skin', J Toxicol Environ Health A, vol. 70, no. 21, Nov, pp. 1858-1865.

NEPC 1998, National Environment Protection (Ambient Air Quality) Measure. <http://scew.gov.au/nepms/ambient-air-quality>.

NEPC 1999 amended 2013a, Schedule B1, Guideline on Investigation Levels For Soil and Groundwater, National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, National Environment Protection Council. <http://scew.gov.au/nepms/assessment-site-contamination>.

NEPC 1999 amended 2013b, Schedule B4, Guideline on Health Risk Assessment Methodology, National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, National Environment Protection Council. <http://scew.gov.au/nepms/assessment-site-contamination>.

NEPC 1999 amended 2013c, Schedule B7, Guideline on Health-Based Investigation Levels, National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, National Environment Protection Council. <http://scew.gov.au/nepms/assessment-site-contamination>.

NEPC Toolbox 2014, Guidance Note on Lead, National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, NEPC. <http://scew.gov.au/node/941#hils>.

NHMRC 1999, Toxicity Assessment for Carcinogenic Soil Contaminants, National Health and Medical Research Council.

NHMRC 2009, Blood lead levels for Australians. <https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/eh55>.

NHMRC 2011 Updated 2015, Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, National Water Quality Management Strategy, National Health and Medical Research Council and Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

NHMRC 2015a, NHMRC Statement: Evidence on the effects of lead on human health, National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra. <https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/eh58>.

NHMRC 2015b, NHMRC Information Paper: Evidence on the effects of lead on human health, National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra. <https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/eh58>.

NSW EPA 2003, Ambient Air Quality Research Project (1996-2001), Internal working paper no. 4, Ambient concentrations of heavy metals in NSW, Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW). <http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/air/heavymetals.pdf>.

Safe Work Australia 2014, Review of hazards and health effects of inorganic lead – implications for WHS regulatory policy., Safe Work Australia.,Canberra. <http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/about/publications/pages/review-of-hazards-and-health-effects-of-inorganic-lead-implications-whs-regulatory-policy>.

UK DEFRA & EA 2002, Contaminants in Soil: Collation of Toxicological Data and Intake Values for Humans. Lead.

UK DEFRA & EA 2014, SP1010 – Development of Category 4 Screening Levels for Assessment of Land Affected by Contamination, Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE), UK DEFRA. <http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Module=More&Location=None&ProjectID=18341>.

UK DEFRA and EA 2002, Contaminants in Soil: Collation of Toxicological Data and Intake Values for Humans. Benzo(a)pyrene, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.

of 282

http://mfe.govt.nz/publications/hazards/toxicological-intake-values-priority-contaminants-soil%3e

http://scew.gov.au/nepms/ambient-air-quality%3e

http://scew.gov.au/nepms/ambient-air-quality%3e

http://scew.gov.au/nepms/assessment-site-contamination%3e



http://scew.gov.au/node/941#hils>

https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/eh55%3e



http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/air/heavymetals.pdf%3e

http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/about/publications/pages/review-of-hazards-and-health-effects-of-inorganic-lead-implications-whs-regulatory-policy%3e

http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/about/publications/pages/review-of-hazards-and-health-effects-of-inorganic-lead-implications-whs-regulatory-policy%3e

http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Module=More&Location=None&ProjectID=18341%3e

15 | P a g e

USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2015.

USEPA 1989, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington.

USEPA 1996, Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, United States Environmental Protection Agency.

USEPA 2002, Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites, Unites States Environmental Protection Agency, Soilid Waste and Emergency Response.

USEPA 2004, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual, (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

USEPA 2005, Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens, Risk Assessment Forum, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington.

USEPA 2009, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual, (Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

USEPA 2014, Toxicological Reivew of Benzo[a]pyrene. In support of Summary Information on IRIS. External Review Draft, National Centre for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Authority. <http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris_drafts/recordisplay.cfm?deid=280022>.

USEPA 2015, Regional Screening Levels for Chemical Contaminants at Superfund Sites, US Environmental Protection Agency. <http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rb-concentration_table/Generic_Tables/index.htm >.

Vic Govt 2002, State Environment Protection Policy (Prevention and Management of Contaminated Land - most recent amendment, Victorian Government. <http://www.epa.vic.gov.au/about-us/legislation/~/media/Files/about_us/Legislation/docs/SEPP-Contam-Land-consolidated.pdf>.

Wester, RC, Maibach, HI, Bucks, DA, Sedik, L, Melendres, J, Liao, C & DiZio, S 1990, 'Percutaneous absorption of [14C]DDT and [14C]benzo[a]pyrene from soil', Fundam Appl Toxicol, vol. 15, no. 3, Oct, pp. 510-516.

WHO 1989, Environmental Health Criteria 85 - Lead (Environmental Aspects). <http://inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc85.htm>.

WHO 1998, Environmental Health Criteria 202 , Selected Non-Heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, World Health Organization, Geneva.

WHO 2000, Air Quality Guidelines for Europe, Second Edition, Copenhagen. <http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/air-quality-guidelines-for-europe>.

WHO 2006, Evaluation of Certain Food Contaminants, 64th Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, WHO Technical Report Series 930, Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, World Health Organisation. <http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_930_eng.pdf>.

WHO 2010a, JECFA 73rd Meeting, Summary and Conclusions. <http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/chem/summary73.pdf>.

WHO 2010b, WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality, Selected Pollutants, WHO Regional Office for Europe.

WHO 2011, Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, Fourth Edition, International Program on Chemical Safety, World Health Organisation. <http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2011/dwq_guidelines/en/>.

of 282

http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris_drafts/recordisplay.cfm?deid=280022%3e

http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rb-concentration_table/Generic_Tables/index.htm

http://www.epa.vic.gov.au/about-us/legislation/~/media/Files/about_us/Legislation/docs/SEPP-Contam-Land-consolidated.pdf%3e

http://www.epa.vic.gov.au/about-us/legislation/~/media/Files/about_us/Legislation/docs/SEPP-Contam-Land-consolidated.pdf%3e

http://inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc85.htm%3e

http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/air-quality-guidelines-for-europe%3e

http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_930_eng.pdf%3e

http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/chem/summary73.pdf%3e

http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2011/dwq_guidelines/en/%3e

Attachment A Development Plans

of 282

of 282

Attachment B Soil Monitoring Results and Bore Logs

of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:


SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH01BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 1.00m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:


TC

FILL: dark brown sand, minor organic matter, glass, slate, crushed rock

FILL: dark brown sand, disturbed brown clay

CLAY: brown, firm, medium plasticity0.5

1.0

BH01/0.05

BH01/0.20

BH01/0.50

BH01/0.90


0.0 - 0.2m, No odour (+BR1 & SPLIT)




0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

REMARKS

of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:


SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH02BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 1.00m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:


TC

FILL: dark brown sand, minor organic matter

FILL: dark brown sand, disturbed brown clay, organic matter

0.5

1.0

BH02/0.05

BH02/0.30

BH02/0.90





0.0

0.0

0.0

REMARKS


of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:


SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH03BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 0.60m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:


TC

CONCRETE:

FILL: dark grey sand, minor organic matter


0.5

BH03/0.10

BH03/0.35





0.0

0.0

REMARKS


of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:


SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH04BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 1.00m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:


TC



0.5

1.0

BH04/0.05

BH04/0.40

BH04/0.90





0.0

0.0

0.0

REMARKS

of 282

Created: 01/12/15 3:50:34 PM

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by

Ge

roc

DESCRIPTION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

DE

PT

H (

m)

SAMPLES

15029JOB NO.:


SOIL BOREHOLELOG

BH05BOREHOLE ID.:

SHEET 1 OF 1

25/11/2015DATE:

HOLE DEPTH: 1.10m

COMMENTSPID (ppm)

DRILL TYPE:

LOGGED BY:


TC




0.5

1.0

BH05/0.05

BH05/0.30

BH05/0.60






0.0

0.0

0.0

REMARKS

of 282


Chlorin

ated

hyd

rocarbon

s EP

AVic

Other chlorinated

hyd

rocarbon

s EPA

Vic


than

e

1,1,1‐trichloroe

than

e


than

e

1,1,2‐trichloroe

than

e

1,1‐dichloroetha

ne

1,1‐dichloroethe

ne

1,2,3‐trichlorop

ropa

ne

1,2‐dichloroetha

ne

1,2‐dichloroprop

ane

1,3‐dichloroprop

ane

Brom

ochlorom

etha

ne

Brom

odichlorom

etha

ne

Brom

oform

Carbon

tetrachloride

Chlorodibrom

ometha

ne

Chloroetha

ne

Chloroform

Chlorometha

ne

cis‐1,2‐dichloroethe

ne

cis‐1,3‐dichloroprop

ene

Dibromom

etha

ne

Dichlorom

etha

ne

Hexachlorob

utad

iene

Trichloroe

then

e

Tetrachloroe

then

e

tran

s‐1,2‐dichloroethe

ne

tran

s‐1,3‐dichloroprop

ene

Viny

l chloride

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

EQL 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.2 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05



0‐2m





0‐1m

EPAVic Fill 1Vic448 Cat C 10 2.8 1.2Vic448 Cat B 50 11 4.8

Field_ID Sampled_Date Matrix_DescriptionBH01/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) <1.1 <0.85 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH01/0.05 (SPLIT) 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) <0.7 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

BH03/0.35 25/11/2015 Disturbed CLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) <1.1 <0.85 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Statistical SummaryNumber of Results 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3

Number of Detects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Minimum Concentration <0.7 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Minimum Detect ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Maximum Concentration <1.1 <0.85 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Maximum Detect ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Average Concentration 0.48 0.39 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

Median Concentration 0.55 0.425 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.1 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

Standard Deviation 0.12 0.058 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Number of Guideline Exceedances 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Number of Guideline Exceedances(Detects Only) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Exceeds adopted EIL



Chlorinated Hydrocarbons

Page 1

of 282


EQL



0‐2m





0‐1m

EPAVic FillVic448 Cat CVic448 Cat B


BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY


Number of Detects


Minimum Detect


Maximum Detect



Standard Deviation





Exceeds adopted EIL



Herbicides

1,2,4‐trichlorob

enzene

1,2‐dichlorobe

nzen

e

1,3‐dichlorobe

nzen

e

1,4‐dichlorobe

nzen

e

4‐chlorotoluen

e

Brom

oben

zene

Chlorobe

nzen

e

Hexachlorob

enzene

1,2‐dibrom

oethan

e

Brom

ometha

ne

Dichlorod

ifluo

rometha

ne

Iodo

metha

ne

Trichlorofluorom

etha

ne

2,4,5‐trichlorop

heno

l

2,4,6‐trichlorop

heno

l

2,4‐dichloroph

enol

2,6‐dichloroph

enol

2‐chloroph

enol

Pentachlorop

heno

l

tetrachlorop

heno

ls

Dinoseb

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.2 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 20

10 100

15 130

<0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <20

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <20

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

<0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <20


<0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <20


0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

0.1 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 10

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Halogenated Hydrocarbons Halogenated PhenolsHalogenated Benzenes

Page 2

of 282


EQL



0‐2m





0‐1m



BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY


Number of Detects


Minimum Detect


Maximum Detect



Standard Deviation





Exceeds adopted EIL



Heavy Metal Particle Size Lead

CEC

Iron (%

)

TOC

% Clay*

Cond

uctiv

ity (1

:5 aqu

eous extract)

Chlorid

e

Cyan

ide To

tal

Fluo

ride

Moisture

Moisture Co

nten

t (dried @ 103

°C)

Nitrate (as N)

pH (a

queo

us extract)

pH (Lab

)

Sulpha

te as S

Lead

Arsenic

Beryllium

Boron

Cadm

ium

Chromium (h

exavalen

t)

Chromium (III+

VI)

Coba

lt

Copp

er

Man

gane

se

Mercury

Molyb

denu

m

Nicke

l

Selenium

Silver

Tin

Vana

dium

Zinc

meq/100g % mg/kg % uS/cm mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % mg/kg pH_Units pH_Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.05 0.01 50 1 10 5 5 100 0.1 5 0.1 0.1 10 5 2 2 10 0.4 1 5 5 5 5 0.1 10 5 2 5 10 10 5

200b 2000b 1100 100 4a 2b 1.4b 0.4b 370 40b 230 500a 6.6b 5b 430 1b 20b 5b 130b 810

200b 2000b 1100 100 4a 2b 1.4b 0.4b 580 40b 220 500a 6.6b 5b 290 1b 20b 5b 130b 800

250 3100C 130,000C 300 100 60 4500 20 100 120,000 100 6000 3800 7 390C 400 200 390c 47000c 390c 7400

300 1200 500 90 40000 150 500 600 30000 14000 120 1200 1400 60000

50 450 300 20 3 1 100 1 40 60 10 10 50 2002500 10000 1500 500 100 500 5000 75 1000 3000 50 180 500 3500010000 40000 6000 2000 400 2000 20000 300 4000 12000 200 720 140000

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <5 170 ‐ 12 ‐ 6.8 ‐ ‐ 830 16 <2 <10 1.7 <1 34 6.6 91 370 0.3 <10 21 <2 <5 20 99 1700 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.7 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 11.8 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

23 2.3 1.5 30 81 27 ‐ ‐ ‐ 13 ‐ 14 ‐ 7.7 7 <10 16 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 30

39 2.6 6.8 7.5 110 22 ‐ ‐ ‐ 14 ‐ 7.2 6.8 20 120 8.8 <2 <10 <0.4 <1 ‐ 9.6 27 130 <0.1 <10 19 <2 <5 <10 74 500 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 11 ‐ 13 <5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 200

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 14 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 960 9.4 <2 <10 0.9 <1 ‐ 9.2 47 210 0.4 <10 25 <2 <5 11 55 1200 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 16 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 19 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 120

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <5 150 ‐ 7.9 ‐ 7.1 ‐ ‐ 1000 4.6 <2 <10 0.9 <1 69 11 61 360 0.5 <10 32 <2 <5 38 24 1100 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 11

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 830 8.3 <2 <10 0.6 <1 ‐ 6.8 46 170 0.2 <10 22 <2 <5 86 55 860 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 16 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.9 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9.5

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 12 1 4 2 2 9 5 5 5 6 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10

2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 12 0 4 2 1 9 5 0 0 4 0 2 5 5 5 4 0 5 0 0 4 5 10

23 2.3 1.5 7.5 81 22 <5 150 11.8 7.7 <5 6.8 6.8 <10 6.9 4.6 <2 <10 <0.4 <1 34 6.6 27 130 <0.1 <10 19 <2 <5 <10 24 9.5

23 2.3 1.5 7.5 81 22 ND 150 11.8 7.7 ND 6.8 6.8 20 6.9 4.6 ND ND 0.6 ND 34 6.6 27 130 0.2 ND 19 ND ND 11 24 9.5

39 2.6 6.8 30 110 27 <5 170 11.8 16 <5 7.7 7 20 1000 16 <2 <10 1.7 <1 69 11 91 370 0.5 <10 32 <2 <5 86 99 1700

39 2.6 6.8 30 110 27 ND 170 11.8 16 ND 7.7 7 20 1000 16 ND ND 1.7 ND 69 11 91 370 0.5 ND 32 ND ND 86 99 1700

13 7.2 421 9.4 1 5 0.75 0.5 8.6 54 248 0.29 5 24 1 2.5 32 61 573

31 2.45 4.15 18.75 95.5 24.5 2.5 160 11.8 13.75 2.5 7.15 6.9 12.5 120 8.8 1 5 0.75 0.5 51.5 9.2 47 210 0.3 5 22 1 2.5 20 55 350

3 0.37 464 4.1 0 0 0.56 0 1.9 24 111 0.17 0 5.1 0 0 33 28 606

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5

Inorganics Metals

Page 3

of 282


EQL



0‐2m





0‐1m



BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY


Number of Detects


Minimum Detect


Maximum Detect



Standard Deviation





Exceeds adopted EIL



4,4‐DDE

a‐BH

C

Aldrin

b‐BH

C

chlordan

e

d‐BH

C

DDD

DDT

Dieldrin

Endo

sulfa

n I

Endo

sulfa

n II

Endo

sulfa

n sulpha

te

Endrin

Endrin aldeh

yde

Endrin keton

e

g‐BH

C (Linda

ne)

Hep

tachlor

Hep

tachlor e

poxide

Metho

xychlor

Toxaph

ene

Organ

ochlorine pe

sticides EPA

Vic

Other organ

ochlorine pe

sticides EPA

Vic

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1

180

180

50 10 6 300 20

90 20 10 500 30

14 1.2 1016 4.8 50

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 0.535 <0.75

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.75

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 0.535 <0.75


<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <1 <1 <0.75


0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.05 0.025 0.025 0.0425 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.5 0.5175 0.375

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Organochlorine Pesticides OCP

Page 4

of 282


EQL



0‐2m





0‐1m



BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY


Number of Detects


Minimum Detect


Maximum Detect



Standard Deviation





Exceeds adopted EIL



PAH

Benzo(b+

j)fluoran

then

e

Benzo(a)py

rene

TEQ

(LOR)

Benzo(a)py

rene

TEQ

calc (Half)

Benzo(a)py

rene

TEQ

calc (Zero)

2,4‐dimethy

lphe

nol

2,4‐dinitrop

heno

l

2‐methy

lphe

nol

2‐nitrop

heno

l

3‐&4‐methy

lphe

nol

4,6‐Dinitro‐2‐methy

lphe

nol

4‐chloro‐3‐m

ethy

lphe

nol

4‐nitrop

heno

l

Acen

aphthe

ne

Acen

aphthy

lene

Anthracene

Benz(a)anthracen

e

Benzo(a) pyren

e

Benzo(g,h,i)p

erylen

e

Benzo(k)flu

oran

then

e

Chrysene

Diben

z(a,h)an

thracene

Carcinog

enic PAH

s as B(a)P TEQ

Fluo

ranthe

ne

Fluo

rene

Inde


e

Nap

htha

lene

PAHs (Sum

of total)

Polycylic aromatic hyd

rocarbon

s EP

AVic

Phen

anthrene

Phen

ol

Phen

ols (non

‐halog

enated

) EPA

Vic

Phen

ols(ha

loge

nated) EPA

Vic

Pyrene

4,6‐Dinitro‐o‐cycloh

exyl phe

nol

Phen

ols (Total Halog

enated

)

Phen

ols (Total Non

Halog

enated

)

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5 0.2 1 0.4 5 1 5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 20 1 20

170 40d 3.5a

170 40d 3.5a

0.7

3 300 3000

4 400 45000

3

1 20 60 15 100 560 1020 400 2200 320

3.1 8.9 8.9 8.9 <0.5 <5 <0.2 <1 <0.4 <5 <1 <5 <0.5 0.7 0.9 3.6 6.4 3.7 3.1 3.7 1.1 8.894 7.2 <0.5 3.4 <0.5 48 45.75 3.4 <0.5 <57.2 <5.5 7.8 <20 <1 <20

4.7 7.4 7.4 7.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 1 1.2 4.1 4.9 2.8 4.1 3.7 0.9 7.415 7.3 <0.5 2.6 <0.5 48 43.85 4.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.3 ‐ ‐ ‐

5.6 7.4 7.4 7.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 0.8 1.5 4.1 5 3.6 2.5 3.6 0.8 7.392 8 <0.5 3 <0.5 49.8 44.95 3.8 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.5 ‐ ‐ ‐

5.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 1.1 1.5 4.4 5.5 3.7 3.8 3.9 1.1 8.356 8.1 <0.5 3.3 <0.5 54 49.25 5.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.8 ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.5 1.2 0.6 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <7.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐

8.5 16 16 16 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 2.8 4.7 11 11 5.4 8 9.2 2 16.42 22 1.9 5.2 1.2 130 119.7 17 ‐ ‐ ‐ 18 ‐ ‐ ‐

2 4 3.8 3.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 0.5 0.8 2.4 2.7 1.5 2 2 <0.5 3.775 4.5 <0.5 1.5 <0.5 26 25.2 2.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3.9 ‐ ‐ ‐

11 19 19 19 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 1.7 2 10 13 6 7.7 9.1 1.9 18.51 13 0.5 5.9 <0.5 100 91.4 7.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 13 ‐ ‐ ‐

1.9 4.1 3.8 3.6 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 0.5 2.5 2.8 1.3 1.8 2.1 <0.5 3.834 5.1 <0.5 1.3 <0.5 26 25.15 1.7 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.8 ‐ ‐ ‐

3.5 6.9 6.9 6.9 <0.5 <5 <0.2 <1 <0.4 <5 <1 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.9 4.6 3.1 3.9 3.2 0.9 6.863 3.9 <0.5 2.7 <0.5 35 32.25 1.9 <0.5 <57.2 <5.5 3.9 <20 <1 <20

<0.5 1.2 0.6 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <7.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐

4.6 7.2 7.2 7.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 0.5 3.3 4.8 3.3 3 3.3 1 7.246 5.6 <0.5 2.9 <0.5 40 36.2 2.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 5.4 ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.5 1.2 0.6 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <7.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐

13 13 13 13 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 2 2 2 13 2 2 2

10 13 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 9 10 10 10 10 10 8 10 10 2 10 1 10 10 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0

<0.5 1.2 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <0.2 <1 <0.4 <5 <1 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <7.5 <0.5 <0.5 <57.2 <5.5 <0.5 <20 <1 <20

1.9 1.2 0.6 3.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 0.5 2.4 2.7 1.3 1.8 2 0.8 3.775 3.9 0.5 1.3 1.2 26 25.15 1.7 ND ND ND 3.9 ND ND ND

11 19 19 19 <0.5 <5 <0.2 <1 <0.4 <5 <1 <5 <0.5 2.8 4.7 11 13 6 8 9.2 2 18.51 22 1.9 5.9 1.2 130 119.7 17 <0.5 <57.2 <5.5 18 <20 <1 <20

11 19 19 19 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.8 4.7 11 13 6 8 9.2 2 18.51 22 1.9 5.9 1.2 130 119.7 17 ND ND ND 18 ND ND ND

3.9 7.1 7 6.9 0.25 0.78 1.1 3.8 4.7 2.7 3.1 3.4 0.84 7 6.6 0.4 2.5 0.32 43 40 3.8 6

3.5 7.2 7.2 7.2 0.25 2.5 0.1 0.5 0.2 2.5 0.5 2.5 0.25 0.5 0.8 3.3 4.8 3.1 3 3.3 0.9 7.246 5.6 0.25 2.7 0.25 40 36.2 2.4 0.25 28.6 2.75 5.4 10 0.5 10

3.2 5.4 5.6 5.7 0 0.76 1.2 3.3 3.9 1.9 2.5 2.9 0.6 5.6 5.9 0.46 1.8 0.26 38 34 4.5 5.1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PAH/Phenols Phenolics

Page 5

of 282


EQL



0‐2m





0‐1m



BR1‐25.11.15 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH01/0.2 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH01/0.5 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH02/0.9 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)


BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH04/0.4 25/11/2015 CLAY

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy)

BH05/0.6 25/11/2015 CLAY


Number of Detects


Minimum Detect


Maximum Detect



Standard Deviation





Exceeds adopted EIL



Arochlor 101

6

Arochlor 122

1

Arochlor 123

2

Arochlor 124

2

Arochlor 124

8

Arochlor 125

4

Arochlor 126

0

PCBs (S

um of total)

Methy

l Ethyl Keton

e

4‐Methy

l‐2‐pen

tano

ne

Aceton

e

Allyl chloride

Carbon

disulfid

e

C10‐C1

6

C16‐C3

4

C34‐C4

0

F2‐NAP

HTH

ALEN

E

C6 ‐ C9

C10 ‐ C

14

C15 ‐ C

28

C29‐C3

6

+C10

‐ C3

6 (Sum

of total)

C6‐C10

Benzen

e

Ethy

lben

zene

Toluen

e

Xylene

(m & p)

Xylene

(o)

Xylene

Total

C6‐C10

less BTE

X (F1)

Mon

ocylic aromatic hyd

rocarbon

s EPA

Vic

1,2,4‐trim

ethy

lben

zene

1,3,5‐trim

ethy

lben

zene

Isop

ropy

lben

zene

Styren

e

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 50 100 100 50 20 20 50 50 50 20 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 20 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

1b 1300 5600 120 65 105 180

1b 1300 5600 120 65 105 180

125 45

1 1.2c 5.8c 490C 65c

1000 2500 10000 700

1

110 0.5 55 160 40 45

2 100 1000 1 70 650 10000 4 700 2600 40000 16 240

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <50 280 <100 <50 <20 <20 200 130 330 <20 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.3 <20 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <50 190 <100 <50 <20 <20 140 110 250 <20 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.3 <20 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <50 190 <100 <50 <20 <20 140 110 250 <20 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.3 <20 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05


<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <50 280 <100 <50 <20 <20 200 130 330 <20 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.3 <20 <0.65 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05


0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 25 235 50 25 10 10 170 120 290 10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.15 10 0.325 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Solvents TPH MAHBTEX

Page 6

of 282

TABLE 2 - ASLP SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Inorganics Lead PAH

pH (Initia

l)

Lead

Cadm

ium

Zinc

Benzo(b+

j)fluoran

then

e

Acen

aphthe

ne

Acen

aphthy

lene

Anthracene

Benz(a)anthracen

e

Benzo(a) pyren

e

Benzo(g,h,i)p

erylen

e

Benzo(k)flu

oran

then

e

Chrysene

Diben

z(a,h)an

thracene

Fluo

ranthe

ne

Fluo

rene

Inde


e

Nap

htha

lene

PAHs (Sum

of total)

Phen

anthrene

Pyrene

pH_Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L

EQL 0.1 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.001 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Vic448 Cat C Leached 1 0.2 300 1

Vic448 Cat B Leached 4 0.8 1200 4

Field_ID Sampled_Date‐Time Matrix_DescriptionBH01/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 8.6 0.1 <0.005 4.6 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

BH02/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 9.1 ‐ ‐ 2.4 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

BH03/0.1 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 9.2 0.12 ‐ 1.7 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

BH04/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 8.8 0.2 ‐ 2.1 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

BH05/0.05 25/11/2015 FILL (Sandy) 8.9 0.15 ‐ 1.6 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Statistical SummaryNumber of Results 5 4 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Number of Detects 5 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Minimum Concentration 8.6 0.1 <0.005 1.6 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Minimum Detect 8.6 0.1 ND 1.6 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Maximum Concentration 9.2 0.2 <0.005 4.6 <0.001 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Maximum Detect 9.2 0.2 ND 4.6 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Average Concentration 8.9 0.14 2.5 0.0005 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Median Concentration 8.9 0.135 0.0025 2.1 0.0005 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Standard Deviation 0.24 0.043 1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Number of Guideline Exceedances 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Number of Guideline Exceedances(Detects Only) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Metals PAH/Phenols

Page 1

of 282

Attachment C Toxicity Profiles – Lead and Carcinogenic PAHs

of 282

General

The quantitative assessment of potential risks to human health for any chemical requires the consideration of the health end-points and where carcinogenicity is identified; the mechanism of action needs to be understood.

For chemicals that are not carcinogenic, a threshold exists below which there are no adverse effects (for all relevant end-points). The threshold typically adopted in risk calculations (a tolerable daily intake [TDI] or tolerable concentration [TC]) is based on the lowest no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL), typically from animal or human (e.g. occupational) studies, and the application of a number of safety or uncertainty factors. Intakes/exposures lower than the TDI/TC is considered safe, or not associated with an adverse health risk (NHMRC 1999).

Where the chemical has the potential for carcinogenic effects the mechanism of action needs to be understood as this defines the way that the dose-response is assessed. Carcinogenic effects are associated with multi-step and multi-mechanism processes that may include genetic damage, altering gene expression and stimulating proliferation of transformed cells. Some carcinogens have the potential to result in genetic (DNA) damage (gene mutation, gene amplification, chromosomal rearrangement) and are termed genotoxic carcinogens. For these carcinogens it is assumed that any exposure may result in one mutation or one DNA damage event that is considered sufficient to initiate the process for the development of cancer sometime during a lifetime (NHMRC 1999). Hence no safe-dose or threshold is assumed and assessment of exposure is based on a linear non-threshold approach using slope factors or unit risk values.

For other (non-genotoxic) carcinogens, while some form of genetic damage (or altered cell growth) is still necessary for cancer to develop, it is not the primary mode of action for these chemicals. For these chemicals carcinogenic effects are associated with indirect mechanisms (that do not directly interact with genetic material) where a threshold is believed to exist.

Dose-response values (threshold or non-threshold) that are considered relevant to the characterisation of potential health effects associated with exposure to the key chemicals identified have been selected from credible peer-reviewed sources as outlined in enHealth and NEPC (enHealth 2012a; NEPC 1999 amended 2013b). With respect to the CoPC identified at this site, the following sections present summary of the key health effects and aspects relevant to the identification and selection of an appropriate toxicity reference value. It is noted that the focus of this assessment is on the inhalation pathway; hence the following sections have focused on toxicity reference values that are relevant for this pathway.

C1.0 Identification of Dose-Response Values for Lead

C1.1 General

Several comprehensive reviews of lead in the environment and toxicity to humans are available (ATSDR 2007; IARC 2006; NHMRC 2015b, 2015a; WHO 1989, 2000). These evaluations have been considered in the following summary.

Lead (Pb) is a naturally occurring element found in the earth’s crust at an average concentration of approximately 15 to 20 mg/kg. It is most commonly found in ores such as galena (PbS), anglesite (PbSO4) and cerussite (PbCO3). Lead is a bluish-grey, soft, dense, malleable, corrosion resistant metal that is solid at room temperature and has a low melting point. It exists in three oxidation states, Pb(0) (metallic lead) Pb(II) and Pb(IV). The most common oxidation state of lead is Pb(II) (ATSDR 2007).

Lead is of primary use in a wide range of materials including batteries, metal alloys, x-ray shielding materials, ammunition, chemical resistant linings and pigments. Lead has been widely used historically as an additive in petrol and also in many paints (ATSDR 2007).

of 282

Health effects associated with exposure to inorganic lead and compounds include, but are not limited to: neurotoxicity, developmental delays, hypertension, impaired haemoglobin synthesis, and male reproductive impairment. The most sensitive targets for lead toxicity are the developing nervous system, the haematological and cardiovascular systems, and the kidney. However, due to the multiple modes of action of lead in biological systems, lead could potentially affect any system or organs in the body. The effects of lead exposure have often been related to the blood lead content, which is generally considered to be the most accurate means of assessing exposure (MfE 2011).

C1.2 Background Intakes

Information available from Australian in relation to background intakes of lead includes the following:

Dietary intakes of lead have been reported from (FSANZ 2003, 2011). Intakes reported in this study range from 0.02-0.4 µg/kg/day for adults to 0.01-1.2 µg/kg/day for infants. This data are the most current from FSANZ and is noted to comprise up to 33.3% of the adopted TDI (the same as is recommended oral TRV). The average of the range presented has been considered in calculations presented using the IEUBK model.

The ADWG (NHMRC 2011 Updated 2015) notes that lead concentrations in drinking water range up to 0.01 mg/L with typical concentrations less than 0.005 mg/L. Data available from South Australia (based on 5 years of data) suggest concentrations of lead in drinking water are on average 0.0007 mg/L, with a maximum of 0.014 mg/L. Intakes derived for a young child (consuming 1 L/day and a body weight of 15.5 kg) is approximately 0.04 µg/kg/day.

Concentrations of lead in air have been derived from Australian data on lead levels in urban, suburban and rural areas. (NSW EPA 2003) report concentrations of lead in air that range from 2.4-99 ng/m3 with an average of 30 ng/m3. Intakes derived from urban air are considered negligible in comparison with that derived from dietary and water sources.

Total intakes from sources other than soil are estimated to be 0.44 µg/kg/day for adults based on intakes from dietary and water sources. This comprises approximately 6% of the adopted threshold value (as discussed below).

C1.3 Classification

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC 2006) has classified inorganic lead as Group 2A: probably carcinogenic to humans. Organolead was classified as Group 3: not classifiable.

It is noted that the USEPA IRIS Database (available from (USEPA)) has classified lead and compounds (last reviewed in 1993) as Class B2: probable human carcinogen.

C1.4 Toxicity Reference Values

Some evidence of carcinogenic effects has been associated with exposure to lead (in experimental animals, with inadequate evidence in humans). It is noted however that there is evidence from human studies that adverse effects other than cancer may occur at lower lead levels (WHO 2011). Hence the adoption of a guideline that addresses the most sensitive non-carcinogenic effects is considered to also be adequately protective of carcinogenic effects.

Blood lead levels have been found to be a good indicator of exposure to lead. A blood lead level reflects lead’s dynamic equilibrium between adsorption, excretion and deposition in soft and hard tissues. Epidemiological studies (and expert groups) do not provide definitive evidence of a threshold in relation to blood lead levels and neurotoxic effects (ATSDR 2007; Baars et al. 2001; UK DEFRA & EA 2002; USEPA), however, blood lead goals and associated intakes have been identified by various agencies for the assessment of lead exposures by the general public. The NHMRC has noted that there are no benefits of human exposure to lead and that all demonstrated effects of exposure are adverse.

of 282

The following threshold values are available from Level 1 Australian and International sources:

Table C1 Toxicity Reference Values

Source Value Basis/Comments

Australian

ADWG (NHMRC 2011 Updated 2015)

PTDI = 0.0035 mg/kg/day PTDI considered in the ADWG is based on the evaluation provided by JECFA and WHO DWG associated with a PTWI of 0.025 mg/kg/week (see comments below).

FSANZ (FSANZ 2003)

PTDI = 0.0035 mg/kg/day As for ADWG above.

NHMRC (NHMRC 2015b, 2015a)

PbB investigation level > 5 µg/dL

The NHMRC evaluation in 2015 noted that it is well established that blood lead levels greater than 10 µg/dL can have harmful effects on many organs and functions. The evidence for health effects occurring as a result of blood lead levels less than 10 µg/dL is less clear. An association has been found between levels below 10 µg/dL and effects on Intelligence Quotient and academic achievement in children, behavioural problems in children, increased blood pressure in adults and a delay in sexual maturation in adolescent boys and girls. However, the evidence is insufficient to conclude lead at these levels is causal for any of these effects. Hence the revised guidance reflects that 5 µg/dL is considered representative of background and a level greater than 5 µg/dL warrants further evaluation, i.e. investigation (NHMRC 2015b, 2015a). This advice replaces the previous blood lead goal of 10 µg/dL (NHMRC 2009)

NEPM (NEPC 1998)

Air Quality Goal = 0.5 µg/m3

Air guideline (based on an annual average) set by NEPM. Basis or the value is not stated; however it is the same as that set by the WHO Air Quality Guidelines.

Safe Work Australia (Safe Work Australia 2014)

Target PbB goals of 20 µg/dL Blood lead removal level 30 µg/dL

Relevant for nearly all workers, including females of non-reproductive capacity and males. For females of reproductive capacity a lower blood lead goal is recommended, namely 10 µg/dL

International

JECFA (WHO 2010a)

PTWI = 0.025 mg/kg In 1972 the JECFA set a PTWI of 0.05 mg/kg. The current PTWI was established in 1986 for infants and children based on metabolic studies showing a mean daily intake of 3-4 µg/kg was not associated with an increase in blood lead levels or in the body burden of lead. An intake of 5 µg/kg was associated with an increase in lead retention. The PTWI was reconfirmed in 1993 and extended to all age groups. The PTWI was estimated to be responsible for a blood lead concentration of 5.6 µg/dL for a 10 kg child, which is thought to be below that associated with effects on intellectual performance. This PTWI was withdrawn by JECFA in 2010 as the committee could no longer consider the value to be health protective. The committee estimated that the previous PTWI was associated with a decrease of at least 3 intelligence quotient (IQ) points in children and an increase in systolic blood pressure of approximately 3 mmHg in adults. Both these effects were considered important within a population. The committee did not provide any indication of a suitable threshold for the key adverse effects of lead and no alternate PTWI was established.

WHO DWG (WHO 2011)

No value provided WHO has adopted a provisional guideline of 0.01 mg/L based on treatment performance and analytical achievability. The WHO evaluation notes the withdrawal of the JECFA PTWI and that no new value is available. The review notes that there does not appear to be a threshold for the key effects of lead.

WHO (WHO 2000)

TC = 0.5 µg/m3 Air guideline (based on an annual average) established for lead based on an objective of 98% of the general population having a blood lead concentration of < 10 µg/dL, where the median blood lead levels would be no more than 5.4 µg/dL.

RIVM (Baars et al. 2001)

PTWI = 0.025 mg/kg Adopted the JECFA evaluation.

UK DEFRA (UK DEFRA & EA 2014)

PbB goals of 1.6 to 5 µg/dL

Conversion of blood lead criteria to intake dose levels of lead based on the IEUBK model for children and two different adult lead models for adults, as follows: Children: 1.6 µg/dL as BMD10 (renal effects) = 0.6 ug/kg/day 3.5 µg/dL as BMDL01 (cardiovascular), BMD01 (neurobehavioral) and BMD20 (renal effects) = 1.4 ug/kg/day 5 µg/dL adopted as CDC action level = 2.1 ug/kg/day Adults: 1.6 µg/dL as BMD10 (renal effects) = 0.6 ug/kg/day 3.5 µg/dL as BMDL01 (cardiovascular), BMD01 (neurobehavioral) and BMD20 (renal effects) = 1.3 ug/kg/day 5 µg/dL adopted as CDC action level = 1.8 ug/kg/day

CDC (CDC 2012) PbB goal of 5 µg/dL Recommends that the PbB goal be used to identify children aged 1-5 years may have elevated blood lead levels. The level is intended to trigger education, investigation and monitoring.

of 282

C1.5 Summary

On the basis of the discussion above, the health investigation levels already calculated in the ASC NEPM using the IEUBK blood lead model have been adopted for this assessment. Management actions to limit potential exposure have also been discussed.

C2.0 Identification of Dose-Response Values for Benzo(a)pyrene

C2.1 General

Several comprehensive reviews of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) in the environment and toxicity to humans are available (ATSDR 1995; CCME 2008; WHO 1998).

PAHs are a large group of organic compounds with two or more fused aromatic rings made up of carbon and hydrogen atoms. PAHs are formed from incomplete combustion of organic materials such as processing of coal, crude oil, combustion of natural gas, refuse, vehicle emissions, heating, cooking and tobacco smoking as well as natural processes including carbonisation. The natural background level is due to PAH production in plant species. Because of such widespread sources, PAHs are present almost everywhere. Food is considered to be the major source of human exposure to PAH due to the formation of PAH during cooking or from atmospheric deposition of PAHs on grains, fruits and vegetables (WHO 1998).

There are several hundred PAHs, including derivatives of PAHs. The best known (and studied) is benzo[a]pyrene (BaP). While there are hundreds of PAHs, typically only 16 individual PAHs are analysed in site contamination investigations. These individual PAHs address a broad range of the equivalent carbon spectrum and are therefore more commonly reported and assessed (WHO 1998).

The major sources of PAHs in soil at any given location invariably contribute a mixture of PAHs, not just single compounds. Various PAH source types can be distinguished based on the characteristic compositions of PAH mixtures and information on the site history, but the contaminated soil matrix is nonetheless challenging from an environmental risk assessment perspective, since in a PAH contaminated soil there is likely to be a diverse compositional range of non-carcinogenic, and carcinogenic PAHs of varying potency (WHO 1998).

The major approach advocated by regulatory agencies such as the NEPC (Fitzgerald, D.J. 1991, 1998; Fitzgerald, D. James, Robinson & Pester 2004; NEPC 1999 amended 2013c), California EPA (CEPA 1999), Netherlands (Baars et al. 2001), the UK Environment Agency (UK DEFRA and EA 2002), Canada (CCME 2008, 2010) and USEPA (USEPA 2014) for assessing the human health risks of PAH-containing mixtures involves the use of “toxicity equivalence factors” (TEFs). This approach relates the toxicity of other (potentially carcinogenic) individual PAHs to that of BaP, the most widely studied carcinogenic PAH.

There are more than a dozen sets of equivalency numbers that have been proposed over the last two decades. The most recent (published final) review of TEFs and their basis, presented by CCME suggests the use of TEFs recommended by the World Health Organization, with minor modifications (CCME 2008, 2010; WHO 1998). This is a scheme based on order of magnitude cancer potency.

Any finer-scale assertions about relative potency for more generic application are hard to justify given the current state of knowledge and confounding influences such as the route of exposure, or non-additive effects in complex PAH mixtures. It is not currently possible to develop different relative potency schemes across different exposure routes (oral, dermal, inhalation), owing to a lack of data. Hence, the TEFs adopted have been applied for all routes of exposure for the carcinogenic PAHs assessed. Application of the TEFs are relevant to the assessment of PAHs that are considered to be carcinogenic. Other PAHs that are not carcinogenic should be assessed separately on an individual basis using a threshold approach.

The following table presents a summary of the TEFs adopted for the assessment of carcinogenic PAHs:

of 282

Table C2 TEFs for PAHs (CCME 2010)

PAH IARC Classification

US EPA Classification

TEF

Benzo(a)anthracene 2B B2 0.1 Benzo(a)pyrene 1 B2 1 Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 2B B2 0.1 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2B B2 0.1 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene* 3 D 0.01 Chrysene 2B B2 0.01 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2A B2 1 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2B B2 0.1

Notes: 1/A= Human Carcinogen, 2A/B2= Probable Human Carcinogen, 2B/C=Possible Human Carcinogen, 3/D= Not classifiable. * Benzo(g,h,i)perylene included due to positive findings in genotoxicity studies (WHO 1998). Note there are insufficient data available to determine carcinogenicity.

The toxic effects of different PAH compounds in a mixture are additive. Experimental evidence suggests that this is a fair assumption (CCME 2008, 2010; Fitzgerald, D.J. 1991, 1998).

The following relates to the approach used to assess BaP (which can be used for the assessment of BaP alone or for carcinogenic PAHs using the above TEFs).

C2.2 Background

Intakes of BaP from sources other than soil have been considered to range from 0.166-1.6 µg/day with intakes derived from food identified as the most significant (Fitzgerald, D.J. 1991). In 2006 the WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) reviewed potential intakes and health effects of PAHs in food. They found that intake of benzo[a]pyrene was on average 0.28 µg/day with a high level intake of 0.7 µg/day (WHO 2006). Background intakes of BaP are not used in the characterisation of risk as BaP is evaluated on the basis of a non-threshold dose response relationship, where an incremental risk is calculated.

C2.3 Classification

The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified BaP as 1: human carcinogen (IARC 2010). The US EPA has classified BaP as B2: probable human carcinogen (USEPA 2014).

C2.4 Toxicity Reference Values

BaP has been shown to be carcinogenic via all routes of exposure. BaP is an indirect carcinogen, that is, its carcinogenicity results from its metabolites, primarily various epoxides, as opposed to BaP itself. Several different types of tumours have been observed as a result of exposure to BaP, although tumour development is closely related to route of administration, i.e., dermal application induces skin tumours and oral administration induces gastric tumours. Exposure to BaP causes disruption to cellular genetic material, in particular, DNA adducts are formed as a result of exposure and BaP is considered to be a genotoxic carcinogen (WHO 1998).

In addition, BaP has been demonstrated to be a skin irritant and dermal sensitiser (WHO 1998).

The USEPA has concluded that BaP (and carcinogenic PAHs assessed on the basis of TEFs) acts via a mutagenic mode of action and recommends that susceptibility associated with early lifetime exposures be addressed. No non-threshold values available for BaP have been derived to specifically address early lifetime susceptibility and hence this issue needs to be addressed when characterising exposure to BaP at a particular site depending on the age of people who may be users of the site (USEPA 2005).

of 282

On this basis a peer-reviewed non-threshold reference value is recommended for BaP. The following non-threshold values are available from relevant Australian and International sources:

Table C3 Adopted Toxicity Reference Values for PAHs/Benzo[a]pyrene

Source Value Basis/Comments Australian

ADWG (NHMRC 2011 Updated 2015)

Not available Current guideline of 0.00001 mg/L is based on the consideration of health effects in relation to the limit of determination for analysis. The assessment provided by the WHO is noted.

OCS No evaluation available International

WHO (WHO 2000, 2010b, 2011)

SF = 0.5 (mg/kg/day)-1 UR =8.7x10-5 (ng/m3)-1

A drinking water guideline of 0.0007 mg/L was derived on the basis of an excess lifetime cancer risk of10-5 from an oral carcinogenicity study and a two-stage birth-death mutation model. Slope factor has been calculated on the basis of a 70kg adult and consumption of 2 L water per day. Inhalation unit risk derived based on observations in coke oven workers to mixtures of PAHs. It is noted that the composition of PAHs to which coke oven workers are exposed may differ from that present in ambient air, or derived from soil contamination. It is noted that an inhalation UR is in the same order of magnitude as that derived using a linear multistage model associated with lung tumours in a rat inhalation study of coal tar/pitch condensation aerosols.

MfE (MfE 2011)

SF = 0.233 (mg/kg/day)-1 Review of the carcinogenic reference values available for oral intakes by MfE considered the range of values available and differences in approaches adopted for low dose extrapolation. The application of cross-species scaling appeared to be the most significant factor affecting the cancer potency estimates. While not applying cross-species scaling is consistent with the approach outlined in NHMRC, the MfE review recommended that it is appropriate for BaP (NHMRC 1999). The toxicological profile provided in the ASC NEPM noted that the correct value for use in Australia was the unscaled slope factor in conjunction with the age specific adjustment factors recommended by the USEPA for mutagenic carcinogens (NEPC 1999 amended 2013c; USEPA 2005)

UK (UK DEFRA and EA 2002)

Derived index doses from WHO evaluations

Oral index dose derived on the basis of WHO approach and a lifetime cancer risk of 10-5. Inhalation index dose based on WHO approach and adopting an air guideline of 0.25 ng/m3. The air guideline is equivalent to a lifetime cancer risk of 4x10-5.

RIVM (Baars et al. 2001)

SF = 0.2 (mg/kg/day)-1

Oral SF derived by RIVM based on a chronic oral carcinogenic rat study and linear multistage model. The study considered was more recent than that considered by the WHO. No inhalation assessment is provided by RIVM.

CCME (CCME 2010)


Oral SF derived from a less than lifetime diet study on inbred CFW-Swiss mice associated with incidence of papillomas and squamous cell carcinomas and linear extrapolation. This is the same study as used by the US EPA in the derivation of their oral slope factor. The CCME review also noted that dermal exposures and primary oral exposures result in different kinds of cancers. Health Canada is currently reviewing data with respect to the derivation of a dermal cancer slope factor, which may require consideration when peer-reviewed and published. The oral slope factor has been used to derive a soil guideline associated with exposures via oral, dermal and inhalation exposures.

OEHHA (CEPA 1999)

SF = 11.5 (mg/kg/day)-1 UR =0.0011 to0.0033 (ug/m3)-1

Oral SF derived using the same model and study as reported by the US EPA (IRIS 2010) and CCME (2008), with the upper end of the range of values adopted by OEHHA. Inhalation UR derived on the basis of respiratory tract tumours in an inhalation study in hamsters and a linearised multistage model.

USEPA (USEPA 2014)


Oral SF (last reviewed in 1994) derived on the basis of the same study considered by CCME (above) where a range of slope factors were derived (4.5 to 11.7 (mg/kg/day)-1). The geometric mean was adopted as the recommended slope factor for derivation of a drinking water guideline. No assessment of inhalation toxicity is available.

There are a wide range of non-threshold reference values available for oral intakes of BaP. The most recent review was conducted by MfE and the methodology used for low dose extrapolation was reviewed (MfE 2011). This evaluation considered all the available and relevant studies noted in the above tables and identified an oral reference value based on the geometric mean of all the studies reviewed. This value has

of 282

been adopted in this assessment as recommended in Appendix A2 of Schedule B7 of the ASC NEPM (NEPC 1999 amended 2013c).

The data available on inhalation exposures are dominated by occupational studies associated with exposure to coke oven emissions or coal tar pitch aerosols. BaP is not volatile and hence the relevance of these studies to the assessment of dust issues derived from a contaminated site where the BaP has been shown to be well bound to particulates (i.e. not available as a fume) is not clear. It is, therefore, recommended that the geometric mean of the oral slope factor (discussed above) be considered for the assessment of all pathways of exposure including inhalation.

C2.5 Dermal Exposures

The standard USEPA approach to assessing risks from dermal contact via systemic mechanisms is appropriate for use for BaP found in historic fill (BaP usually sourced from ash in such fill).

Review of dermal absorption of BaP has been conducted by MfE (MfE 2011). This review has identified the following, based on studies on animals and humans (rather than modelled as presented by CCME (2008)):

As BaP is actively metabolised in the skin it is relevant to include both the amount that passes through the skin and that which remains bound to the skin to estimate dermal uptake.

The USEPA (USEPA 2004) recommends a dermal absorption factor of 0.13 (13%), which is based on data from Wester et al. (Wester et al. 1990). These authors indicate that 13.2% of BaP in soil was absorbed by rhesus monkeys over a 24-h period. However, they also indicate that a reduced amount (1.4%) was absorbed into human skin from soil over the same time period, although no partitioning into human plasma occurred, i.e., the BaP remained bound to the skin.

Another study on the dermal absorption of BaP from soils also showed that a minimal amount (0.1%) of BaP was absorbed through pig skin and 1.7% and 3.5% remained bound to the skin when BaP respectively in aged sandy and clay soils was applied to the skin (Abdel-Rahman, Skowronski & Turkal 2002). A higher amount (3.3% and 8.3% in clay and sandy soils, respectively) was absorbed when non-aged soil (i.e., freshly spiked) was applied to the skin.

A more recent study with human skin showed greater absorption through the skin, with approximately 7% of BaP passing through when applied as freshly spiked soil (Moody et al. 2007). A further 7% remained bound to the skin.

As aging soils decrease the bioavailability of BaP, the dermal absorption data from freshly spiked soils can provide a “worst-case” estimate of dermal absorption. The geometric mean of dermal absorption using freshly spiked soils from the above studies (including in vivo studies) is 6%, while using data for aged soils yields a geometric mean of 2.6% (Abdel-Rahman, Skowronski & Turkal 2002).

Based on the above, the PAH impacts identified are considered to be well bound to the soil and more consistent with aged contamination. Even so, a dermal absorption factor of 6% has been assumed for use in this assessment.

C2.6 Summary

On the basis of the discussion above, the following toxicity reference values (TRVs) have been adopted for BaP:

Oral TRV (TRVO) = 0.233 (mg/kg/day)-1 (MfE 2011) for all routes of exposure Dermal absorption factor (DAF) = 0.06 (or 6%) (MfE 2011) BaP equivalents to be determined for carcinogenic and potential genotoxic PAHs only using TEFs

presented by CCME (2008)

Include the use of age specific adjustment factors to account for childhood exposure

of 282

Attachment D Risk Calculations

of 282

(mg/kg/day)

Ingestion Rate (IRs, mg/day) 50 As per enHealth (2012) for adults (soil ingestion outdoors)Fraction Ingested from Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assumed to be 100%Bioavailability (B) 1Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 265 Average number of dry days per year (Melbourne Regional Met Station)Exposure Duration (ED, years) 29 Assumed duration of exposureBody Weight (BW, kg) 70 As per enHealth (2012)Conversion Factor (CF) 0.000001 conversion from mg to kgAge Dependent Adjustment Weighting Factor 1.7 3 fold for rest of childhood and 1 fold for adultAveraging Time - NonThreshold (Atc, days) 25550 USEPA 1989 Averaging Time - Threshold (Atn, days) 10585 USEPA 1989

Daily Intake Calculated RiskNon-Threshold

Slope Factor

Threshold

TDI

Background

Intake (% TDI)

TDI Allowable for

Assessment (TDI-

Background)

NonThreshold Threshold Non-Threshold

Risk

Chronic Hazard

Quotient

(mg/kg-day)-1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless)Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalents 2.3E-01 9.7 2.1E-06 5.0E-06 4.9E-7 --

TOTAL 4.9E-7

Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Soil - Adult Resident

Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Resident

Key Chemical

Toxicity DataConcentration

in Soil (Cs)

ATBW

EDEFBCFFIIRCIntakeChemicalDaily S

SIS

of 282

Dermal Exposure to Chemicals via Contact with Soil - Adult Resident

(mg/kg/day)

Surface Area (SAs, cm2) 6300 Based on hands, legs and arms getting dirty, NEPM 1999 amended 2013Adherence Factor (AF, mg/cm2) 0.5 Value relevant for soil as per NEPMFraction of Day Exposed 0.5 Assume the dirt remains on the skin for 12 hoursConversion Factor (CF) 0.000001 Conversion of unitsDermal absorption (ABS, unitless) Chemical-specific (as below)Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 265 Average number of dry days per year (Melbourne Regional Met Station)Exposure Duration (ED, years) 29 Assumed duration of exposureBody Weight (BW, kg) 70 As per enHealth (2012)Age Dependent Adjustment Weighting Factor 1.7 3 fold for rest of childhood and 1 fold for adultAveraging Time - NonThreshold (Atc, days) 25550 US EPA 1989 Averaging Time - Threshold (Atn, days) 10585 US EPA 1989


Slope Factor

Threshold

TDI

Background

Intake (% TDI)

TDI Allowable for

Assessment (TDI-

Background)

Dermal

Absorption

(ABS)

Non-

Threshold

Threshold Non-Threshold

Risk

Chronic Hazard

Quotient

(mg/kg-day)-1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless)Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalents 2.3E-01 0.06 9.7 6.7E-06 9.5E-06 1.6E-6 --

TOTAL 1.6E-6 --


Key Chemical


in Soil (Cs)

ATBW

EDEFCFABSFEAFSACIntakeChemicalDaily S

SDS

of 282

Soil to Air Particulate Emission Factor (PEF) - Outdoors(Reference: US EPA Soil Screening Guidance (1996), Supplemental Guidance (2002))

where: Site Data Comments

A area of site (acres) 0.01 Area of concern - part of site not covered by building Q/C = dispersion factor (g/m2/s per kg/m3) 203.68 Calculated using equations for outdoor worker from US EPA, 2001V = fraction of vegetative cover (unitless) 0.5 Assume half of the area has vegetation cover Um = mean annual windspeed (m/s) 3.4

Ut = equivalent threshold value (m/s) 11.3 Calculated for a threshold velocity of 1 m/s (US EPA, 1996)Ut/Um = ratio of threshold value to windspeed 3.3 RatioFx = windspeed distribution function (unitless) 1.87E-03 Value based on Ut/Um ratio, Cowherd (1985)

PEF = 8.04E+11 (m3/kg)

COPC

Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalents

Mean windspeed from 9am and 3pm readings from Melbourne Regional Met Station

9.70

Soil Concentration,

Csoil (mg/kg)

Dust Concentration

Cdust [=Csoil/PEF]

(mg/m3)

1.2E-11

PEF for fugitive dust emissions considered relevant for the quantification of inhalation exposures by outdoor workers on a residential or commercial/industrial site (including gardening and landscaping activities). However it is noted that the fugitive model may not be relevant for activities and conditions that may result in the generation of potentially high dust emissions such as dry soils (MC<8%) , fine soils (high silt or clay content), high annual average winds (>5.3 m/s) and less than 50% vegetative cover.

x

t

m FU

UV

CQPEF

-

3)()1(036.0

3600/

of 282

(mg/m3)

Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 4 Assumed time spent outdoors at the site each dayFraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of dust is from site related soilDeposition Fraction (DF, unitless) 0.75 Assume 75% inhaled dust reaches lungsCilliary Clearance (CC, unitless) 0.5 Assume 50% small enough to penetrate deep enough for absorptionExposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 265 Average number of dry days per year (Melbourne Regional Met Station)Exposure Duration (ED, years) 29 Duration of exposure as adultAge Dependent Adjustment Weighting Factor 1.7 3 fold for rest of childhood and 1 fold for adultAveraging Time - NonThreshold (Atc, hours) 613200 US EPA 2009Averaging Time - Threshold (Atn, hours) 254040 US EPA 2009

Concentration Daily Exposure Calculated RiskInhalation

Unit Risk

Chronic TC

air

Background

Intake (%

Chronic TC)

Chronic TC Allowable

for Assessment (TC-

Background)

in Air (Ca) Inhalation

Exposure

Concentration - NonThreshold

Inhalation Exposure

Concentration - Threshold

Non-Threshold

Risk

Chronic Hazard

Quotient

(mg/m3)-1 (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (unitless) (unitless)Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalents 8.7E+01 9.6E-12 3.1E-13 4.3E-13 2.7E-11 --

TOTAL 2.7E-11

Exposure to Chemicals via Inhalation of Vapours and Dust (derived from Soil Source) - Adult Resident


Key Chemical

Toxicity Data

AT

EDEFCCDFFIETCConcExposureInhalation aP

AT


of 282

(mg/kg/day)

Ingestion Rate (IRs, mg/day) 100 As per enHealth (2012) for adults (soil ingestion outdoors)Fraction Ingested from Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assumed to be 100%Bioavailability (B) 1 Assumed to be 100%Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 265 Average number of dry days per year (Melbourne Regional Met Station)Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Assumed duration of exposureBody Weight (BW, kg) 15 As per enHealth (2012)Conversion Factor (CF) 0.000001 conversion from mg to kgAge Dependent Adjustment Weighting Factor 5.3 10 fold for first 2 years of life and 3 fold for next 4 yearsAveraging Time - NonThreshold (Atc, days) 25550 US EPA 1989 Averaging Time - Threshold (Atn, days) 2190 US EPA 1989


Slope Factor

Threshold

TDI

Background

Intake (% TDI)

TDI Allowable for

Assessment (TDI-

Background)

NonThreshold Threshold Non-Threshold

Risk

Chronic Hazard

Quotient

(mg/kg-day)-1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless)Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalents 2.3E-01 9.7 2.1E-05 4.7E-05 5.0E-6 --

TOTAL 5.0E-6

Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Soil - Child Resident

Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure to Child Resident

Key Chemical


in Soil (Cs)

ATBW

EDEFBCFFIIRCIntakeChemicalDaily S

SIS

of 282

Dermal Exposure to Chemicals via Contact with Soil - Child Resident

(mg/kg/day)

Surface Area (SAs, cm2) 2700 Based on hands, legs and arms getting dirty, NEPM 1999 amended 2013Adherence Factor (AF, mg/cm2) 0.5 Value relevant for soil as per NEPMFraction of Day Exposed 0.5 Assume the dirt remains on the skin for 12 hoursConversion Factor (CF) 0.000001 Conversion of unitsDermal absorption (ABS, unitless) Chemical-specific (as below)Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 265 Average number of dry days per year (Melbourne Regional Met Station)Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Assumed duration of exposureBody Weight (BW, kg) 15 As per enHealth (2012)Age Dependent Adjustment Weighting Factor 5.3 10 fold for first 2 years of life and 3 fold for next 4 yearsAveraging Time - NonThreshold (Atc, days) 25550 US EPA 1989 Averaging Time - Threshold (Atn, days) 2190 US EPA 1989


Slope Factor

Threshold

TDI

Background

Intake (% TDI)

TDI Allowable for

Assessment (TDI-

Background)

Dermal

Absorption

(ABS)

Non-

Threshold

Threshold Non-Threshold

Risk

Chronic Hazard

Quotient

(mg/kg-day)-1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless)Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalents 2.3E-01 0.06 9.7 8.6E-06 1.9E-05 2.0E-6 --

TOTAL 2.0E-6 --


Key Chemical


in Soil (Cs)

ATBW

EDEFCFABSFEAFSACIntakeChemicalDaily S

SDS

of 282

(mg/m3)

Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 4 Assumed time spent at the site each dayFraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of dust is from site related soilDeposition Fraction (DF, unitless) 0.75 Assume 75% inhaled dust reaches lungsCilliary Clearance (CC, unitless) 0.5 Assume 50% small enough to penetrate deep enough for absorptionExposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 265 Average number of dry days per year (Melbourne Regional Met Station)Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure as young child and adultAge Dependent Adjustment Weighting Factor 5.3 10 fold for first 2 years of life and 3 fold for next 4 yearsAveraging Time - NonThreshold (Atc, hours) 613200 US EPA 2009Averaging Time - Threshold (Atn, hours) 52560 US EPA 2009

Concentration Daily Exposure Calculated RiskInhalation

Unit Risk

Chronic TC

air

Background

Intake (%

Chronic TC)

Chronic TC Allowable

for Assessment (TC-

Background)

in Air (Ca) Inhalation

Exposure

Concentration - NonThreshold

Inhalation Exposure

Concentration - Threshold

Non-Threshold

Risk

Chronic Hazard

Quotient

(mg/m3)-1 (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (unitless) (unitless)Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalents 8.7E+01 9.6E-12 2.0E-13 4.3E-13 1.7E-11 --

TOTAL 1.7E-11

Exposure to Chemicals via Inhalation of Vapours and Dust (derived from Soil Source) - Child Resident


Key Chemical

Toxicity Data

AT


AT


of 282


Appendix D: Auditor Verification Sample

Documentation

of 282

Y0005: 18820

25 John Street

Clifton Hill

Table D1: Auditor Verification RPD Results

Sample ID 18820_BH1_0.05 BH01_0.05 RPD%

Sample Type Auditor Sample Assessor Sample

Matrix Type Soil Soil

Sample Date 25/11/2015 25/11/2015

Laboratory Eurofins_mgt Eurofins_mgt

Lab Report ID 480995‐S 480951‐S

Analyte Units

PAH

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 9.8 6.4 42.0

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.7 <0.5 NC

Total PAH mg/kg 120 48 85.7

Metals

Arsenic mg/kg 9.9 16 47.1

Beryllium mg/kg <2 <2 NC

Boron mg/kg <10 <10 NC

Cadmium mg/kg 1.6 1.7 6.1

Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg <1 <1 NC

Cobalt mg/kg 7.6 6.6 14.1

Copper mg/kg 100 91 9.4

Lead mg/kg 2000 830 82.7

Manganese mg/kg 320 370 14.5

Mercury mg/kg 0.8 0.3 90.9

Nickel mg/kg 27 21 25.0

Selenium mg/kg <2 <2 NC

Zinc mg/kg 1400 1700 19.4

Notes:

NC ‐ indicates RPD unable to be calculated due to either one or both sample pairs below LOR or no result available

‐ indicates no analysis performed

Shading indicates exceedance of 50% acceptance limit between replicate pairs (AS4482.1‐2005

SOIL

Y0005: 18820

18820 EAR CARMS 71254‐2Page 1 of 1

of 282


Prensa VIC

261-271 Wattletree Rd

Malvern

VIC 3144

Attention: Jeremy McDonnell

Report 480995-S

Project name EA

Project ID 18820


Client Sample ID 18820_BH1_0.05

Sample Matrix Soil





Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 15

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 15

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 15


Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg 1.7

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 11

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 9.2

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 9.8

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg 9.7

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg 6.0

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg 9.0

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg 8.2

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 1.7

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg 20

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg 0.9

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 5.7

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg 0.7

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg 11

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 17

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg 120



Chromium (hexavalent) 1 mg/kg < 1

% Moisture 0.1 % 10

Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 9.9

Beryllium 2 mg/kg < 2

Boron 10 mg/kg < 10

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg 1.6

Cobalt 5 mg/kg 7.6

Copper 5 mg/kg 100

Lead 5 mg/kg 2000

Manganese 5 mg/kg 320

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg 0.8




Page 1 of 9




of 282

Client Sample ID 18820_BH1_0.05

Sample Matrix Soil




Heavy Metals

Nickel 5 mg/kg 27

Selenium 2 mg/kg < 2

Zinc 5 mg/kg 1400




Page 2 of 9


of 282






Chromium (hexavalent) Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 28 Day

- Method: APHA 3500-Cr Hexavalent Chromium- (Extraction:- USEPA3060)

Heavy Metals Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 180 Day


% Moisture Melbourne Nov 26, 2015 14 Day





Page 3 of 9


of 282

.Company Name: Prensa VIC Order No.: Received: Nov 25, 2015 12:36 PMAddress: 261-271 Wattletree Rd Report #: 480995 Due: Dec 2, 2015

Malvern Phone: 9508 0100 Priority: 5 DayVIC 3144 Fax: Contact Name: Jeremy McDonnell

Project Name: EAProject ID: 18820

Eurofins | mgt Client Manager: Sarah Gould

Sample Detail

Polycyclic A

romatic H

ydrocarbons

NE

PM

2013 Metals : M

etals M13

Moisture S

et


Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X



External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID

18820_BH1_0.05

Nov 25, 2015 11:00AM Soil M15-No22224 X X X








Page 4 of 9


of 282


General

Holding Times

Units

Terms




request.








Receipt Advice.




















































Page 5 of 9


of 282



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank


















Method Blank

Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg < 1 1 Pass

Method Blank

Heavy Metals

Arsenic mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Beryllium mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Boron mg/kg < 10 10 Pass

Cadmium mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass

Cobalt mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Copper mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Lead mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Manganese mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Mercury mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Nickel mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Selenium mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Zinc mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


















LCS - % Recovery




Page 6 of 9


of 282


PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Chromium (hexavalent) % 98 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

Heavy Metals

Arsenic % 86 80-120 Pass

Beryllium % 91 80-120 Pass

Boron % 84 80-120 Pass

Cadmium % 86 80-120 Pass

Cobalt % 89 80-120 Pass

Copper % 90 80-120 Pass

Lead % 103 80-120 Pass

Manganese % 106 80-120 Pass

Mercury % 115 75-125 Pass

Nickel % 90 80-120 Pass

Selenium % 83 80-120 Pass

Zinc % 111 80-120 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery


Acenaphthene M15-No24370 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene M15-No24370 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass

Anthracene M15-No24370 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M15-No24370 NCP % 93 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M15-No24370 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M15-No24370 NCP % 83 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M15-No24370 NCP % 79 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M15-No24370 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass

Chrysene M15-No24370 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M15-No24370 NCP % 96 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene M15-No24370 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass

Fluorene M15-No24370 NCP % 98 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M15-No24370 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene M15-No24370 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene M15-No24370 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Pyrene M15-No24370 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Result 1

Chromium (hexavalent) M15-No21884 NCP % 81 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Arsenic M15-No22065 NCP % 87 75-125 Pass

Beryllium M15-No22065 NCP % 84 75-125 Pass

Boron M15-No22065 NCP % 75 75-125 Pass

Cadmium M15-No22065 NCP % 82 75-125 Pass

Cobalt M15-No22065 NCP % 80 75-125 Pass

Copper M15-No22065 NCP % 95 75-125 Pass

Lead M15-No23237 NCP % 85 75-125 Pass

Manganese M15-No24367 NCP % 80 75-125 Pass

Mercury M15-No22314 NCP % 110 70-130 Pass

Nickel M15-No22065 NCP % 80 75-125 Pass

Selenium M15-No22055 NCP % 84 75-125 Pass

Zinc M15-No23237 NCP % 93 75-125 Pass




Page 7 of 9


of 282


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate


Acenaphthene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Anthracene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Chrysene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Fluoranthene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Fluorene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Naphthalene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Pyrene M15-No22691 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


Chromium (hexavalent) M15-No22229 NCP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

% Moisture M15-No22224 CP % 10 11 9.0 30% Pass

Duplicate


Arsenic M15-No22221 NCP mg/kg 9.0 8.4 7.0 30% Pass

Beryllium M15-No22221 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Boron M15-No22221 NCP mg/kg 120 110 7.0 30% Pass

Cadmium M15-No22221 NCP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass

Cobalt M15-No22221 NCP mg/kg 9.2 8.4 9.0 30% Pass

Copper M15-No22221 NCP mg/kg 22 21 5.0 30% Pass

Lead M15-No20577 NCP mg/kg 12000 13000 3.0 30% Pass

Manganese M15-No22065 NCP mg/kg 380 340 11 30% Pass

Mercury M15-No22314 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Nickel M15-No22221 NCP mg/kg 12 11 12 30% Pass

Selenium M15-No22221 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Zinc M15-No20315 NCP mg/kg 400 380 6.0 30% Pass




Page 8 of 9


of 282

Comments









Code Description


Authorised By

Sarah Gould Analytical Services Manager




Glenn Jackson








Page 9 of 9


of 282









Company name: Prensa VICPrensa VICPrensa VICPrensa VIC

Contact name: Jeremy McDonnellProject name: EAProject ID: 18820COC number: Y0005Turn around time: 5 DayDate/Time received: Nov 25, 2015 12:36 PMEurofins | mgt reference: 480995480995480995480995














Sarah Gould on Phone : (+61) (8) 8154 3100 or by e.mail: [email protected]

Results will be delivered electronically via e.mail to Jeremy McDonnell - [email protected].

of 282

of 282

INFORMATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT ...

Documents

Transcript of INFORMATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT ...