INF Treaty Coming Apart?
6
pdfcrowd.com open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API Search Search Follow Gatestone: Dansk Deutsch Español Français Italiano Nederlands Português Tweet INF Treaty Coming Apart? by Debalina Ghoshal September 2, 2014 at 3:00 am http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4655/inf-treaty-coming-apart Comment (3) According to former Bush administration official Stephen Rademaker, for the United States to respond to Russian violations of the treaty by pulling out of it would be "welcome in Moscow," which is "wrestling with the question of how they terminate [the treaty]" and thus, the United States should not make it easier for the Russians to leave. After the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, when the Soviet Union and the United States were on the brink of a nuclear catastrophe, both parties apparently realized the need for some nuclear arms control measures. The Intermediate-Rage Nuclear Forces Treaty [INF], which came into force in December 1987, requires that both the Soviet Union and the United States eliminate their ground-launched, nuclear-capable ballistic and cruise missiles of ranges between 500-5500 km. In recent times, however, both parties to the treaty, the United States and Russia, have accused one another of failure to comply with it. The U.S. has apparently been "concerned" regarding Russia's compliance with the treaty since 2011. FREE RAIF BADAWI! Raif Badawi may now be facing the death penalty for apostasy in Saudi Arabia, according to reports that are surfacing. WATCH: Crossing the Line 2 The rise of anti-Israel activity and anti-Semitism on Campus ABOUT US EVENTS EXPERTS AUTHORS ARCHIVES GATESTONE IN THE MEDIA DONATE
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
5 -
download
0
Transcript of INF Treaty Coming Apart?
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Search Search
Follow Gatestone:
Dansk Deutsch Español Français Italiano Nederlands Português
Tweet
INF Treaty Coming Apart?by Debalina GhoshalSeptember 2, 2014 at 3:00 amhttp://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4655/inf-treaty-coming-apart
Comment (3)
According to former Bush administration official Stephen Rademaker,for the United States to respond to Russian violations of the treaty bypulling out of it would be "welcome in Moscow," which is "wrestling withthe question of how they terminate [the treaty]" and thus, the UnitedStates should not make it easier for the Russians to leave.
After the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, when the Soviet Union and the United States were on thebrink of a nuclear catastrophe, both parties apparently realized the need for some nuclear armscontrol measures. The Intermediate-Rage Nuclear Forces Treaty [INF], which came into force inDecember 1987, requires that both the Soviet Union and the United States eliminate theirground-launched, nuclear-capable ballistic and cruise missiles of ranges between 500-5500 km.
In recent times, however, both parties to the treaty, the United States and Russia, have accusedone another of failure to comply with it.
The U.S. has apparently been "concerned" regarding Russia's compliance with the treaty since2011.
FREE RAIF BADAWI!Raif Badawi may now be facing the death penaltyfor apostasy in Saudi Arabia, according to reports
that are surfacing.
WATCH: Crossing the Line 2The rise of anti-Israel activity
and anti-Semitism on Campus
ABOUT US EVENTS EXPERTS AUTHORS ARCHIVES GATESTONE IN THE MEDIA DONATE
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
In July 2014, reports stated that Russia had test-fired intermediate range cruise missiles of themodel called the R-500 or the Iskander-K, and prohibited under the INF treaty. U.S. Rep. MikeRogers, Chairman of the House Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee, called thisviolation "cheating" that could put the United States and its allies in East Asia and Europe "atrisk."
A camouflaged unit of the Russian R-500 (Iskander-K) missile system.
The U.S. seems justifiably alarmed by Russia's violation of the treaty. U.S. President BarackObama rated this violation "a very serious matter." NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe,General Philip M Breedlove, also claimed that the tests should not go "unanswered" and thatthey will be "dealt with."
President Obama, however, wrote a letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin noting that the
Gatestone in Sunday's New York Times:"Beautifying Islam"
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
U.S. would still not violate the INF treaty by deploying the prohibited INF-range missile systems.
According to former Bush administration official Stephen Rademaker, for the United States torespond to Russian violations of the treaty by pulling out of it would be "welcome in Moscow,"which is "wrestling with the question of how they terminate [the treaty]" and thus, the UnitedStates should not make it easier for the Russians to leave.
In addition, Russia also tested its RS-26 Rubezh ICBM several times for distances of about2000 km, a range not permitted under the treaty.
The Russian Defense Ministry, however, responded that the RS-26 missile is a "new type" ofICBM [missiles with range of 5500 km and above] -- and not a prohibited intermediate rangemissile -- and thus "legally unconstrained" by the treaty.
Aleksey Arbatov, a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, chimed in that the missile is"technically beyond suspicion" and that the maximum range of the missile is 5700 km. A missilewith range of 5700 km falls under the ICBM category and not under the intermediate rangecategory. Another Russian military political analyst, Andrey Koshin, added that the UnitedStates had "used" the alleged violation "to boost global tensions in the background of theUkrainian crisis and sanctions imposed on Russia."
And the Russian Foreign Ministry alleged that U.S. claims that Russia violated the treaty arebased on "warped logic," and made "with little or no evidence."
Russia, according to Russia Today, believes it faces threats -- allegedly emanating from China,India, Pakistan, Iran and North Korea -- from medium range missiles.
Russia also might be concerned about the inclusion of Japan in the U.S. missile defensestrategy. As Russia's defense minister stated during the first joint conference ever betweenRussia and Japan in November 2013, "We made no secret of the fact that the creation by theU.S, of a global missile defence system, including a Japanese element, is causing us graveconcern, primarily over the possible destruction of the strategic balance of power in the Asia-Pacific region."
Russia has, however, been provoking clashes with Japan by claiming ownership Japan's KurileIslands. Japan does not possess ballistic missiles at present, however its space capabilitiesinvolve several technologies "that could potentially be adapted to develop long range missiles."
A New Policy of Economic Growth and Job Creation
View videos from the Gatestone Energy Conference
SUBSCRIBE TO MAILING LIST
Email Address Submit
British Girls Raped by Muslim Gangs on"Industrial Scale"by Soeren Kern
Obam a Declares War on Israelby Bassam Tawil
Sweden's Foreign Minister Reviled as anEnem y of the Prophetby Ingrid Carlqvist and Lars Hedegaard
Most Read Most Shared Newest
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Russia has also appeared "concerned" regarding the U.S. missile defense system in Europe,under the European Phased Adaptive Approach. The director of the department of nonproliferation and arms control at the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mikhail Ulyanov,evidently assuming that this missile defense system could negate Russia's nuclear deterrentcapability, has announced that such a policy "can undermine strategic stability."
Despite U.S. assurances that the missile defense system is not intended to be against Russia,but possibly against Iran, Putin, apparently not feeling reassured, has repeatedly threatened towithdraw from the treaty.
"Missile defence systems [in Europe] are defensive only in name" Putin said. He added thatthese systems are a significant component of a "strategic offensive potential," and that thismissile defense deployment was an attempt by the U.S. to "create a new stage of Americansuperiority in Europe" and "neutralize" Russia's nuclear potential.
Russia has also accused the United States of testing Hera missiles, which it claims are medium-range missiles. The production and flight-testing of these, under the Article 6 of the INF Treaty,are banned. The Russians seem concerned that that the United States "could considerablyimprove the capabilities of the Hera."
Washington responded that Article 7 of the Treaty permits the use of "boosters systems."
Yuri Solomonov, a Russian expert and the chief designer of Russia's modern nuclear systems,also accused the U.S. of testing other target missiles -- the Long Range Air Launched Target(LRALT) and the (Medium Range Target) MRT, up to 2000 km and 1100 km range respectively-- which could be a part of the Theater High Altitude Air Defence system to be deployed in U.S.allied territories such as Japan and Taiwan in the Asia-Pacific region.
Using target missiles in these ranges is apparently prohibited in the INF treaty. Despite RussianForeign Ministry complaints about them, Russia was "met with no response."
Russia also raised concerns over the MK41 Vertical Launching System, planned to be deployedin Romania and Poland. Russia apparently believes it could be used to launch intermediate-range cruise missiles.
The INF treaty has proven that it is indeed possible to eliminate an entire class of nuclearweapons systems. However, considering the pace at which INF category missiles are beingdeveloped by states such as China, India, Iran, Israel, and North Korea, how far Russia and the
Tweets by @GatestoneInst
President is not Com m ander in Chief ofForeign Policyby Alan M. Dershowitz
Guess Who's Not Speaking at the J StreetConference?by Alan M. Dershowitz
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
United States will continue to adhere to the treaty remains to be seen.
Debalina Ghoshal is an Associate Fellow at the Centre for Air Power Studies, NewDelhi, India.
Related Topics: Russia | Debalina Ghoshal
RECEIVE THE LATEST BY EMAIL: SUBSCRIBE TO THE FREE GATESTONE INSTITUTE MAILING LIST.
Reader comments on this itemTitle By Date
Treaties [106 words] Jim Sep 2, 2014 21:32
↔ Europe. [148 words] Jim Sep 4, 2014 02:20
The American Doublespeak says it all! [233 words] Alice Maxwell Sep 2, 2014 18:11
Comment on this itemName Email Address
Title of Comments
Comments:
Submit Comment Email me if someone replies to my comment
Note: Gatestone Institute greatly appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right, however, not to
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Copyright © 2015 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved.
The articles printed here do notnecessarily reflect the views of theEditors or of Gatestone Institute.
Both reserve the right not to publishreplies to articles should they so choose
GATESTONE CONTACTS
Contact: [email protected]:[email protected]: [email protected]: [email protected]
Events: [email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
GATESTONE LINKS
About UsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyEventsArchives
publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or any broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnicgroup or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar. Allthoughtful suggestions and analyses will be gratefully considered. Commenters' email addresses will not bedisplayed publicly.
