i THE REGIONAL DIMENSION OF PROTRACTED SOCIAL CONFLICTS: THE CHAOS OF THE AFRICAN GREAT LAKES
Transcript of i THE REGIONAL DIMENSION OF PROTRACTED SOCIAL CONFLICTS: THE CHAOS OF THE AFRICAN GREAT LAKES
i
THE REGIONAL DIMENSION OF PROTRACTED SOCIAL CONFLICTS: THE CHAOS OF THE AFRICAN GREAT LAKES
Mark Vincent Abdilla
140192(M)
This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Bachelor of Arts (Hons.) in International Relations at the Faculty of Arts
University of Malta
Year 2013
ii
UNIVERSITY OF MALTA FACULTY/INSTITUTE/CENTRE: Arts
Declaration Student’s I.D. /Code 140192 (M) Student’s Name & Surname Mark Vincent Abdilla Course B.A. (Hons). International Relations
Title of Long Essay/Dissertation/Thesis
The Regional Dimension of Protracted Social Conflicts: The Chaos of the African Great
Lakes
I hereby declare that I am the legitimate author of this Long Essay/Dissertation/Thesis and that it is my original work. No portion of this work has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other university or institution of learning. ______________________ ______________________ Signature of Student Name of Student (in Caps) _____________________ Date
iv
Acknowledgments
First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Anna Khakee, who
throughout the entirety of my research and even before I had even submitted my
proposal, was there to lend a very valuable helping hand.
I would also like to thank my girlfriend Louise for her love, for supporting me
through thick and thin and without whom this dissertation would certainly have never
been completed.
Last, but certainly not least, I would like to also thank my family, for their constant
assistance towards helping me reach this stage of my education. I couldn’t have done it
without you all.
Thank you!
v
Abstract
The current situation in the African Great Lakes can be described as chaotic.
Ever since the states of the region realised their independence in the years after the
Second World War, conflicts over ethnicity, natural resources and declining state
systems have been the common theme. This dissertation set out to analyse the
situation in the African Great Lakes through the lens of the theories of regional conflict
complexes and protracted social conflicts, with the aim being to emphasise that it is
possible for a protracted social conflict to take place on a regional level rather than just
on the domestic level. This was done through the analysis of both the historical and
contemporary dynamics of the conflicts in the African Great Lakes, focusing primarily on
the Rwandan Genocide, the two Congo Wars and the situation in the DRC after peace
had been brokered. It found that whilst the case of the African Great Lakes is in fact a
very good example of a protracted social conflict, it has a predominant regional basis
which defines the entire conflict in the area. This suggested that a protracted social
conflict can very well take place on a regional dimension, thus resulting in a protracted
regional conflict. This allowed for greater flexibility to the theory of protracted social
conflicts through the use of regional conflict complexes.
vi
Table of Contents
Declaration .................................................................................................................................. ii
Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... iv
Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... v
Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... vi
Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1
The Issues ............................................................................................................................... 1
A map of the dissertation ......................................................................................................... 2
Chapter 1: Literature Review ....................................................................................................... 5
Literature on the African Great Lakes ...................................................................................... 5
Literature on Rwanda .............................................................................................................. 8
Literature on Burundi ............................................................................................................... 9
Literature on the DRC ............................................................................................................ 10
The Report by the Group of Experts ...................................................................................... 12
Where does this dissertation stand in the literature? .............................................................. 14
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 15
Chapter 2: Protracted Social Conflicts and Regional Conflict Complexes .................................. 16
The Theory of Protracted Social Conflicts .............................................................................. 17
Azar’s propositions ............................................................................................................. 17
Regional Conflict Complexes ................................................................................................. 22
The theories and the case study ............................................................................................ 24
Chapter 3: The Methodology ..................................................................................................... 26
The Research Question ......................................................................................................... 26
The case study approach ....................................................................................................... 27
vii
Other methodological options ................................................................................................ 28
Chapter 4: The History of the African Great Lakes .................................................................... 30
The effects of colonisation and independence ....................................................................... 31
Rwanda and Burundi. ......................................................................................................... 32
The Congo. ........................................................................................................................ 34
The Rwandan Genocide ........................................................................................................ 37
The Two Congo Wars ............................................................................................................ 41
Where did Uganda stand? ..................................................................................................... 43
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 44
Chapter 5: The Contemporary Situation .................................................................................... 46
After the peace process ......................................................................................................... 46
Ethnic Dimensions of the Conflict .......................................................................................... 48
The Deprivation of Human Needs .......................................................................................... 49
The weak centralised state system and state-building ........................................................... 51
International influences and involvement ............................................................................... 53
The regional dimension of protracted social conflicts ............................................................. 55
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 58
Bibliography .............................................................................................................................. 61
1
Introduction
The Issues
When discussing issues relating to conflict and regional incompatibilities, one of
the most interesting cases in the world today is the African Great Lakes Region. The
region is arguably not only the most unstable on all of the African Continent, but perhaps
the most problematic and volatile in the world today. The region certainly cannot be
omitted from the ‘intra-national crises and violent inter-ethnic and inter-regional
confrontations’ which dominated post-colonial states after the end of the Second World
War (Rwantabagu: 2001, 41).
The ongoing conflict which this dissertation is concerned about, and which is
taking place at the very heart of the African Great Lakes region, is a product of various
issues which have been present since the area was under the colonial occupation of
Belgium, and the results of this occupation after the achievement of independence. The
conflict is centred on a particular area of the Democratic Republic of the Congo; the Kivu
region.1 The Kivu region, being the eastern-most region of the country, has been the
most vulnerable area subject to the conflict; being dominated by a plethora of armed
rebel groups, human rights violations and displacement issues. Ethnicity, weak
governments and the resources of the Kivu region are some of the factors which make
1 The Kivu Region is the Eastern region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It borders Uganda,
Burundi, Rwanda and Zambia. While there are others regions of interests pertaining to the conflict, the Kivu region will be at focus of this research.
2
the conflict as complex and deadly as it is. The conflict takes both an intrastate and
interstate form, with rebel groups being at the centre of the regions’ problems, with one
of the primary concerns being the financial and military backing on the parts of Uganda
and Rwanda. Particularly, the ongoing conflicts and clashes, between the rebel groups
on the one hand and the Congolese army and United Nations peacekeepers on the
other, are a primary cause of widespread displacement and the creation of refugee
situations (Human Rights Watch: 2010). The roots behind all this confusion take us
back to the 1994 Rwandan genocide, which was the catalyst to the region’s woes, and
the factor which led to the eventual eruption of the Second Congo War, 1998 - 2003
(Prunier: 2009). One must also take into consideration the causes of the Rwandan
genocide and the social, economic and political realities which dominated the region
leading up to these atrocities. The post-war situation was not a favourable one for the
Kivu region and thus, despite the presence of United Nations peacekeeping troops, the
region remained an area defined by violence and rebel groups.
A map of the dissertation
‘The area known as the Great Lakes region of Africa has, since the 1960s, been
the arena of civil strife of an often protracted nature’ (Daley: 2006, 203). In her paper,
Patricia Daley defines the African Great Lakes Region as consisting of the Democratic
Republic of the Congo, the Republic of Rwanda, the Republic of Burundi, the Republic
of Uganda and the United Republic of Tanzania. For the purpose of this dissertation,
3
the same states will be included in the study; with the exception of Tanzania, which shall
be omitted from the analysis.2
The main aim of this dissertation is to apply Edward Azar’s theory of Protracted
Social Conflicts to the African Great Lakes, with an important focus being thrown on
whether there is a regional dimension to this theory. To this end, a discussion on the
theory of regional conflict complexes will also be undertaken. In order to carry out this
application, this dissertation will utilise a case study approach, whereby the discussion
will centre on, firstly, the historical issues which originally created the root causes of the
conflict, and then shift towards the contemporary situation, with the distinct aim of
applying the theory. The reason behind the choice of the African Great Lakes is
because this region is constantly identified as a very volatile and fragile region by
various scholars and it is a worthwhile endeavour to focus on a conflict which at times
can be described as taking a back-seat to other on-going conflicts in the world. Through
the analysis of the region’s history and then a more focused look at the conflict
dynamics which are present at the moment, a relevant and feasible application of the
theory can be made, whilst at the same time pushing the theory from the domestic level
to the regional level.
This dissertation will be structured as follows. The first chapter will focus
specifically on the literature which is already available on this region, discussing more
specifically its relevance to this dissertation’s scope. Then a detailed discussion of the
factors of the theory of Protracted Social Conflicts will be undertaken to create an
understanding of what Edward Azar looked to fulfil through his theory. Another chapter
will then shift the focus on the methodology which will offer a more detailed explanation
2 Throughout the turmoil which the African Great Lakes region has experienced, Tanzania has very rarely
played an active role, neither historically nor contemporarily; and thus it would be misleading to include Tanzania as an active actor within the African Great Lakes.
4
of the research question and the case-study approach being utilised, along with other
methods which could have been relevant to this research. An analysis of the region’s
history will follow, primarily discussing the most important events from the end of the
Second World War to the eruption of the Second Congo War. The final chapter will
focus on the current conflict situation, taking a more specific look at refugee movements
and interests in natural resources since these are highly volatile issues which are
constantly playing an important role in the region. This chapter will also be centred on
applying the theory to the case-study while also discussing the regional dimension of the
conflict, and its relevance to the theory.
The next chapter will thus focus on the literature review, discussing the relevant
literature on the subject, its relevance to this dissertation, as well as the areas where the
literature is either poor or non-existent. In this way, an idea of how knowledge of this
subject can be improved is provided.
5
Chapter 1: Literature Review
Literature on war, conflict and social incompatibilities is aplenty. The vast amount
of literature allows for detailed analysis into various fields of conflict studies. The
purpose of this chapter is to account for the literature which is available on the subject of
conflict in the African Great Lakes Region and which will be utilised throughout the
entirety of this dissertation. The literature which will be discussed and used throughout
this dissertation includes books, journal articles, and reports from the United Nations as
well as international organisations. In order to carry out a more systematic analysis of
the literature, this chapter will be divided according to the subject which the literature is
concerned with, including primarily historical evaluations, literature on refugee
movements and human right situations as well as literature dealing with the
contemporary situation of the African Great Lakes. Most importantly, this chapter will
also address the shortcomings of the literature being utilised in this dissertation and how
the latter can add to the current research in the field of conflict studies.
Literature on the African Great Lakes
Knowledge of the history of the African Great Lakes will prove to be an important
tool of analysis in tackling the research question. Indeed when speaking about the
current conflict raging in the region, it is imperative that the historical dynamics which
6
ultimately caused the chaos rampant in the region is discussed and understood. In his
work World Politics 1945 – 2000 Peter Calvocoressi (2001) looks to tackle the situation
which had dominated the entire world as a result of the end of the Second World War.
His analysis of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Rwanda and Burundi
focus on the political situation in the three states after they had gained their
independence from Belgium. Calvocoressi proves to be an important reference tool on
this subject; however it is important to note that his work is not dedicated only to the
situation in the African Great Lakes, but on the broader context of the post-World War II
era on a global level and thus, some crucial details are missing from his analysis.
Meanwhile, Patricia Daley (2006) in Challenges to Peace: Conflict Resolution in the
Great Lakes Region of Africa focuses on the peace initiatives which were undertaken
throughout the course of the various conflicts in the history of the African Great Lakes
after decolonisation and independence, providing a suitable addition to our knowledge
on the course of events during this period.
‘If the fate of the African continent evokes hopelessness, nowhere is this sense of
despair more evident than in former Belgian Africa’ (Lemerchand: 2004, 61).
Lemerchand’s focus in his chapter in Facing Ethnic Conflicts (2004) takes a lengthy look
at ethnical conflict within the African Great Lakes. His approach is concerned with the
ethnic history of the region, specifically on the consequences of colonial rule and how
this contributed to the situation where ethnic rivalry was assisting towards the
culmination of conflict. Particularly, his focus falls on political exclusion of ethnic
minorities, such as the Tutsis in Rwanda and the Hutu in Burundi (Lemerchand: 2004).
He also looks towards refugee flows and ‘the illicit exploitation of the Congo’s resources’
as main issues which are fuelling ethnic conflicts in the region (Lemerchand: 2004, 76).
The main focus of this dissertation is to ultimately look at how refugee movements and
7
resource gathering are playing into the regional relations between the DRC, Rwanda,
Uganda and Burundi. This chapter is very useful as it provides important insights into
the history of conflict in the region and how societies in this area are divided into the
various ethnic groups, particularly the critical divisions between Hutu and Tutsi ethnic
groups.
Focusing primarily on the instability in the African Great Lakes, Lucy Hovil (2008)
focuses on the concept of displacement and how this contributes towards growing
instability in the African Great Lakes. Her analysis is an important contribution to the
literature on conflict as it ‘explores the relationship between violence that endangers
displacement and the forms of violence that result from displacement’ (Hovil: 2008, 4).
Amongst the most important works on the history of the African Great Lakes,
Gérard Prunier’s Africa’s World War (2009) certainly stands out as one of the most
important. Any research into the African Great Lakes must include Prunier’s work,
which spans from the situation after the Rwandan Genocide and the factors which
dominated the region after the end of the Second Congo War. His analysis is not only
on the domestic level, but also on the international level, where he looks at the effects of
the international world on the situation in the region and what kinds of consequences
these resulted in.
Finally, the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA) presents a report
on the current situation in the African Great Lakes (2004). This can be considered as
being one of the most detailed pieces of literature on the subject, as it takes into account
the entire history of the states in the region, both before colonisation and after their
independence. The report is ultimately aimed at coming up with suggestions towards
creating much stronger prospects for a lasting peace in the region, by carrying out an
8
analysis of both the historical and contemporary conflict dynamics. It certainly fills in a
lot of gaps which are not addressed by academic literature.
Literature on Rwanda
Rwanda is an important case in the region, mainly because along with the DRC, it
has been at the forefront of the conflict situation in the African Great Lakes. Rwanda is
also the site where the ethnic division between the Hutu and the Tutsi culminated into
the most horrific event the world had ever seen since the Holocaust; the Rwandan
Genocide. Helen M. Hintjens (1999), in her article Explaining the 1994 Genocide in
Rwanda, focuses on the causes behind the ethnic rivalry between the Hutu and the
Tutsi and carries out an analysis of how these factors brought about the genocide. This
work is an extremely important piece of literature in the history of the African Great
Lakes as the genocide can be considered as one of the most pivotal moments in the
region’s build-up towards conflict.
Continuing on the subject of the Rwandan Genocide, Bearing Witness to Mass
Murder from René Lemarchand is what he calls a piece of ‘witness literature’, where the
article here is focused specifically on a firsthand account of the various massacres
which were taking place ‘between October 1996 and September 1997’ (2005, 93). It is
an extremely detailed account of what was taking place in the region, primarily
highlighting the constant chaos which was running rampant as a cause of the violence
taking place between Rwanda and its rebel enemies. Also adding to the literature on
the genocide is Peter Uvin (1997), who in his article Prejudice, Crisis, and Genocide in
Rwanda carries out his own analysis on the causes of the tragedy as well as the
consequences which were brought about by this genocide.
9
Villia Jefremovas (1997) carries out an analysis of Rwanda’s pre-colonial history
in comparison to the history which worked its way to the Rwandan Genocide. His
discussion takes into account the various interpretations of the pre-colonial realities of
Rwanda and focuses on the main points which ultimately led to the ethnic issues which
led to the Hutu-Tutsi division.
Literature on Burundi
Literature on Burundi is as important an aspect of the research being carried out
by this dissertation as is the literature on Rwanda. Having been joined to Rwanda as
one colony under Belgian rule, Burundi was subject to the same issues and problems
which plagued Rwanda in the post-independence period. An important author in this
area is Hermenegilde Rwantabagu (2001), whose analysis falls on the civil war in
Burundi. The discussion looks to explain the causes of the civil war, whilst also offering
democratic solutions for the pacification of further threats of conflicts breaking out in the
state, most importantly supported by the international community.
Daniel P. Sullivan (2005) also looks at the civil war in Burundi and why peace
failed on so many occasions. His discussion takes place in the context of consociational
democracy, and while this is not a relevant aspect for this dissertation, it does provide a
good background analysis which provides more insight into the conflict itself.
Perhaps one of the most interesting pieces of literature on the conflicts in both
Burundi and Rwanda is Localized Ethnic Conflict and Genocide: Accounting for
Differences in Rwanda and Burundi by Ravi Bhavnani and David Backer (2000). This
comparative analysis looks to highlight the differences between Rwanda and Burundi in
how the conflicts in their own particular territories were carried out. It is certainly an
10
important article as it aids in the understanding of how conflicts in the region ultimately
relate to each other and how the inherent differences between the two states came to
affect the African Great Lakes on a regional dimension.
Literature on the DRC
Being at the very core of the turmoil in the African Great Lakes, the DRC is an
important entity which definitely cannot be put aside when discussing conflict in the
region. As is the case with Rwanda and Burundi, it is important to look at both the
historical aspects of the DRC as well as the current situation to gain a full understanding
of the current conflict dynamics in the Kivu region. There is a great amount of literature
on ranging aspects of the DRC, some of which will be outlined in this section of the
literature review.
Adam Hochschild (2001) in his article Congo’s Many Plunderers provides a very
good assessment of the current situation in the DRC through the historical looking glass,
ranging from the effects of King Leopold II and his actions in the territory to the fall of
Mobutu and the creation of the DRC. Adding to this, Emizet F. Kisangani (2003)
focuses his analysis on the rebel groups in the DRC, discussing primarily their
ideologies and drive for conflict, as well as the main forces driving these rebel groups on
both the external and internal levels.
Literature specifically on the Second Congo War is also an important area of
research which will highly contribute to this dissertation. Filip Reyntjens (1999)
discusses the causes of the Second Congo War after the fall of Mobutu and the
restructuring of Zaire into the DRC. His analysis is highly important as it provides a
11
good outline of what happened between the end of the First Congo War and the
eruption of its successive war.
Another important article on conflict in not only the DRC, but also Rwanda and
Burundi, can be found in Jean Migabo Kalere (2005). He discusses genocide mainly
from the political, economic and legal perspectives, however the latter is his main focus
and while this piece of literature adds to the already existing body of knowledge on the
area, it is not wholly relevant to this dissertation. The report by the Human Rights Watch
(2010) can help add to this, as it focuses on refugee movements in the DRC and how
the conflict is aiding in the escalation of human rights violations.
On a more contemporary note, Alex Veit (2010) in his book Intervention as
Indirect Rule: Civil War and Statebuilding in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, a
focus on the effects of the United Nations in the Ituri region of the DRC is taken up. It is
one of the most important pieces of literature on international linkages on the DRC,
which as will be seen later on, are an important aspect of this dissertation.
On the issue of refugee movements, Kisangani N. F. Emizet (2000) adds to Veit’s
analysis by highlighting the failures of the UN in its peacekeeping. While his perspective
is primarily a legal one, the literature does contribute to the issue of human rights
violations in the DRC.
Lastly we find a case study by Stephanie Matti (2012) on illegal resource
extraction in the DRC, where she focuses on Operation Lightning Storm, an operation
between Uganda, the DRC and Sudan against the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) in the
Eastern DRC. This continues to add to our knowledge of interaction between states in
the region (in this case the DRC and Uganda), whilst also emphasising the richness of
the DRC in terms of natural resources.
12
The Report by the Group of Experts
Perhaps the most relevant and critical of all the literature on the current situation
in the Great Lakes Region of Africa is the report by the Group of Experts on the DRC
(2012). The main aims of the report include making an analysis of the development of
areas of primary resources, carry out investigations into supposed war criminals and
violators of humanitarian law as well as looking into the provision of armaments for the
various rebel groups (UNSCa: 2012). Yet, the report has one primarily important
outcome, which is having tremendous effects on relations within the region, and this
outcome is expressed within the addendum of the report. According to the Group of
Experts, Rwanda is aiding the rebellion known as March 23 (or M23) in various ways.
(UNSCb: 2012) These include ‘direct assistance in the creation of M23 through the
transport of weapons and soldiers through Rwandan territory’, the provision of sources
of recruitment for M23 and “provision of weapons and ammunition’. (UNSCb: 2012) A
more recent report, which was leaked to Reuters, claims that Uganda is also supporting
the M23 rebellion in the Congo (Reuters: 2012). While it is not the aim of this
dissertation to evaluate whether Rwanda and Uganda are actually supporting the M23
rebellion, there is no doubt that such allegations are having serious effects on the entire
conflict picture in the African Great Lakes and could potentially make it harder for peace
to be found.
On this subject, Times Magazine conducted an interview with Paul Kagame, the
President of Rwanda (Perry: 2012). Such an interview is extremely important as it
presents the point of view of Rwanda on the issue of the war in the Kivu region, in a
scenario where Rwanda is being demonised as a state taking advantage of the chaos in
its neighbour’s territory. As previously stated however, it is not the aim of this
dissertation to prove whether Rwanda is involved in rebel financing or not, yet the
13
interview itself provides a very good viewpoint into Rwanda as a state, as well as how
Rwanda and the DRC relate to each other in terms of the M23 rebellion. Kagame
describes the relationship between these two states as being a ‘blood relationship’ and
states that ‘the relationship between Congo and Rwanda has been there since time
immemorial’ (Perry: 2012). This is an important factor to consider when discussing the
region. Kagame also makes note of the effects security in the DRC are having on
Rwanda, notably stating that ‘Our problem in Congo for 18 years has been a security
problem’ (Perry: 2012). In this case, i.e. the case of bilateral relations between Rwanda
and the DRC, it is clear that the tensions created by the conflict in East Kivu are having
drastic effects on inter-state relations. When one considers that the literature on
regional relations in the African Great Lakes is limited, such an interview is an important
piece of evidence which can point to the shifting dynamics of regional relations.
Kagame also makes the important statement: ‘My relationship with President Kabila has
been gradually eroded by things that have happened in the last few weeks’ (Perry:
2012).
This growing rift between Rwanda and the DRC can be described as an ugly
blow to the progress which had been made since the end of the Second Congo War,
when “there was great hope for the region’s political and economic development.”
(Vorrath: 2011, 2) In a special report by the United States Institute of Peace, Judith
Vorrath focuses on political trends in the African Great Lakes, which could have
important effects in the way the conflict in the Kivu region progresses, and how regional
relationships shift as the conflict itself changes. She speaks of great progress in the
relationship between the DRC and Rwanda, stating that ‘hostility between the formerly
opposed governments has lessened’ (Vorrath: 2011, 2). The focus here ultimately falls
on political and electoral trends and it is prime evidence that the constant conflicts in the
14
region do not allow for legitimate, democratically elected governments to take over in
these states. In Rwanda, Uganda and the DRC, ‘the incumbent was confirmed in office’
in the latest elections (Vorrath: 2011, 4). The contradiction of Vorrath’s report with that
of the Group of Experts is evident. While this would have been relevant in the year
2011, the Security Council report as has already been described renders the previous
report irrelevant and thus, it cannot be utilised for the purpose of aiding towards the
dissertation’s attempts at theoretical application.
Where does this dissertation stand in the literature?
Certainly, we can conclude that the literature on the subject of conflict in the
African Great Lakes is plentiful, especially in terms of the Rwandan Genocide and the
two Congo Wars. Nevertheless, certain limitations can be identified, and these will
become evident throughout this dissertation as well. To start with, details on certain
aspects of the African Great Lakes, such as ethnicity in the Congo, or political and
economic issues in Rwanda and Burundi, are very scarce in terms of academic
literature. On ethnicity, for example, one is forced to rely solely on Lemerchand (2004)
as he gives the best analysis on these issues in terms of a theoretical perspective. This
leads me to believe that research into this area should be given a priority, as it will
definitely serve to heighten our knowledge on the area. Whilst the literature is quite
varied, there is no sense of variety on specific areas, meaning that one needs to be tied
down to certain literature in order to find the required information.
Ultimately this dissertation is planned to provide a new perspective on the African
Great Lakes; a perspective which not only introduces the theory of protracted social
conflicts to the case study, but also looks to utilise the theory of regional conflict
complexes to further enhance the aforementioned theory. This will help in increasing
15
the literature on the area, and hopefully even encourage further research into the
subject at hand.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that there is a very large and varied array of literature on the
African Great Lakes Region, as well as literature focusing on the particular states within
the region. A thorough understanding of this literature is crucial to aid towards the
understanding of conflict dynamics in the region, as well as in aiding our understanding
of conflict theories and their application to the case study of the African Great Lakes. As
was pointed out, there are various different perspectives provided on the subject and
this allows for an even greater understanding of the case study.
Having taken a look at most of the relevant literature which will certainly be
referred to throughout this dissertation, it is now important to take a more detailed and
structured look at the theory which will be used to discuss the conflict in the Kivu
Region, as has already been briefly discussed in this literature review. More
importantly, an analysis of how these theories (i.e. the theory of regional conflict
complexes and the theory of Protracted Social Conflict) can be applied to the factors
and dynamics of the African Great Lakes will also be undertaken.
16
Chapter 2: Protracted Social Conflicts and Regional Conflict Complexes
The African Great Lakes Region comprises a number of states, which for
decades have been ravaged and torn apart by conflict on various lines, particularly
because of ethnic incompatibilities and disagreement with domestic regimes. At the
centre of the African Great Lakes is the Kivu region of the DRC, and as has already
been stated, it is in this region that conflict has always been at its strongest form. There
are two viable theoretical approaches which would provide useful means of analysing
how a domestic conflict took the form of a regional conflict and is today severely
affecting the relationships between the states in the African Great Lakes. These
approaches are the theory of protracted social conflicts and the theory of regional
conflict complexes. The main reason behind my choice of these two theories is that the
former was the first theory of its kind to deal with intrastate conflicts, whilst the latter
tackles conflicts at the regional level. The theory of regional conflict complexes is meant
to complement the theory of protracted social conflicts, by providing the latter with a
regional dimension within which it can be analysed and thus, applied. The ultimate goal
of this research is to give a new regional dimension to the theory of protracted social
conflicts and thus, the regional conflict complex theory is the best regional conflict theory
which could aid in this research as it addresses how conflicts within the same region
relate to each other and how they contribute to the overall complexity of the region’s
stability.
17
The Theory of Protracted Social Conflicts
The theory of protracted social conflicts was first coined by the conflict analyst Edward
Azar, who had correctly predicted that intrastate conflicts would eventually surpass
interstate conflicts in that they would grow in both importance and frequency
(Ramsbotham, Woodhouse & Miall: 2011). ‘The term “protracted social conflict”
emphasized that the sources of such conflicts lay predominantly within (and across)
rather than between states’ (Ramsbotham et. al: 2011, 100). Edward Azar himself
stated that he is ‘using the term “protracted social conflict” to suggest the type of on-
going and seemingly unresolvable conflict’ (Azar: 1985, 59). It is primarily a theory
which outlines the main causes behind the growth of intrastate conflicts, during a period
when interstate conflicts were still dominating the interest of the international system,
which is what ultimately makes this theory so important in the field of conflict studies and
conflict resolution. Nadine Ansorg, in fact, states that “Not until the end of the Cold War
and the breakdown of the Soviet Union did alternative approaches which placed a
greater focus on regions and regional conflict gain in importance.” (2010, 4) In his work
Protracted International Conflicts: Ten Propositions (1985), Azar highlights the most
important factors which would make up the social, economic and political situations
leading to a protracted social conflict. His focus is to highlight the most important series
of factors which typically make up a intrastate conflict.
Azar’s propositions
The primary feature of a protracted social conflict is its length, hence the use of
the term ‘protracted’. Conflicts of a prolonged nature typically have a certain set of
characteristics which make up the main causes for the conflict in question, as well as the
18
reasons for its prolongation (Azar: 1985) Azar’s first proposition highlights the effects
brought about by irregularities in social and political systems, as well as
underdevelopment. Here, the chances of conflict are highly strengthened when political
opportunities and privileges are not available to all social groups, thus resulting in
serious social cleavages (Azar: 1985).
In his second proposition, he emphasises how the factors related to the first
proposition lead up to communal and ethnic cleavages and mass injustice at various
levels. These types of features are the factors which prove that the state is no longer
the sole actor in a conflict situation. For example, if an ethnic group feels that it is being
repressed by society and that its identity is not being respected, then it can very easily
become a primary actor in a conflict situation. Azar terms such problems as being
‘perceived victimization’ (Azar: 1985, 61). Thus, an important observation is made here,
where:
the source of protracted social conflict is the denial of those elements required in the development of all people and societies, and whose pursuit is a compelling need in all. (Azar: 1985, 60)
What really and truly matters in issues of ethnicity and minority subjugation, ‘is
the denial of those human needs that are common to all and whose pursuit is an
ontological drive in all’ (Azar: 1985, 60). This concept of depriving basic human needs is
Azar’s third proposition, and it is the factor ‘that finally emerges as the source of conflict’
(Azar: 1985, 61). What eventually occurs is that the conflict takes precedence over the
diverging groups who are participating in it. Furthermore, the diverging groups started
utilising the concept of ‘perceived victimization’ to their advantage (Azar: 1985, 61). In
this way, it starts determining the actions of the various actors, and here Azar states
19
how ‘conflictual events are clearly more absorbing and have more impact on
determining the consequent actions of groups and nations’ (1985, 62). Because of this,
cooperative events are usually not enough to overcome a protracted social conflict.
According to his fourth proposition, this view of being victims stems from the
identity groups inability to maintain a separate identity within the state’s political process,
‘an absence of security of culture and valued relationships’ and the inability to ultimately
deal directly with the perception of victimisation (Azar: 1985, 61). These three
consequences of conflict are ultimately issues which only serve to further strengthen the
nature of the conflict, thus contributing to its protraction.
In his fifth proposition, Azar makes a further observation to his discussion of
social group cleavages, where ‘human needs and long-standing cultural values’ are non-
negotiable factors in any conflict and thus, the focus must fall on other factors in a
conflict, namely those ‘interests which derive from personal roles and opportunities
within existing political systems’ (Azar: 1985, 61).
Azar’s sixth proposition makes a useful addition to the issues of human needs
deprivation in the third proposition where ‘conflictual and cooperative events flow
together even in the most severe of intense conflicts’ (Azar: 1985, 62). In this context,
cooperative events are quite frequently more numerous than conflictual events, however
the underlying problem is always the fact that the latter type of events are more visible
and absorbing, thus making cooperative events and the positive effects they could have
on the conflict situation invisible. Thus, in relation to ethnic cleavages, negotiations
must centre on grievances and not on the cultural aspects of the opposing groups.
20
For Azar, the most important unit of analysis is the identity groups, which
usually incorporates the group or groups which have a dispute with the national
government of the state in question. These groups are usually also defined by the
aspect which unites the members of this group, such as ethnicity, religion and culture
(Azar: 1985). ‘For the purpose of describing, explaining and predicting the dynamics of
a protracted social conflict situation, the identity group is more informative than the
nation-state’ (Azar: 1985, 62). This is emphasised in his seventh proposition. What
Azar means with this is that when it comes to analysing the main issues which make up
a protracted social conflict, identity groups provide the analyst which much more
information on ‘the societal needs of the individual’, while the state gives a much
broader view as a unit of analysis (Azar: 1985, 63).
Another important issue, which is emphasised in the eight proposition, is the
international system and its contribution and involvement in domestic conflicts. The
involvement of outside states in domestic conflicts could very well have two completely
opposite effects; either they would contribute to a possible resolution of the conflict or
they could very well intensify the conflict. Azar uses the example of Cyprus, where the
conflict revolved around whether the Cypriots should identify themselves with Greece or
Turkey, and this would eventually lead to a division of the state between the Greek and
Turkish Cypriots (Azar: 1985). This is becoming even more prevalent in the
contemporary world, especially with the phenomenon of state-sponsored terrorism.
Conflicts always start out with a primary set of actors and their specific goals, but with
the interference of other states and organisations, new sub-actors and more complex
conflict dynamics become essential parts of the conflict (Azar: 1985).
Finally, one last aspect of protracted social conflicts is the deprivation of human
needs, as is emphasised in the ninth proposition. Here the unit of analysis remains the
21
identity group, however the state has a more important role as it is usually the entity
which has to ensure that basic human needs are being met for its population (Azar:
1985). When these human needs are not met and consequences such as
underdevelopment, disease and poverty become rife within society, then the chances of
a conflict erupting are much higher. Actors act in a conflict “to satisfy their needs” first
and foremost, and thus the state of human needs in society is an essential factor in
determining whether a conflict will take place (Azar: 1985, 64). At the same time, once
the conflict erupts, Azar also makes the assertion that centralised institutions do not
have the effect of lessening the dangers of protracted social conflicts, but at times,
centralised structures contribute to the strengthening of the conflict.
Here, the state becomes the main unit of analysis, as is emphasised in his tenth
and final proposal. This is mainly because they ‘reduce the opportunity for a sense of
community among groups’ (Azar: 1985, 65). At the same time, a more decentralised
system gives more power to local authorities and this would mean that identity groups
would be much more respected since they could quite possibly hold some power at the
local level; which they do not enjoy at the national level. A possible solution here would
be to allow dissatisfied groups more power on a local level however in this regard local
authorities have their own short-comings as they could foster autocratic rule and while
they may be satisfactory on a local level, they may not be able to address important
regional issues (Azar: 1985). Thus, the discussion of protracted social conflicts must
take into account the identity groups on the one hand and the state and the way it works
on the other. Both units of analysis must be present.
Ramsbotham, Woodhouse and Miall summarise the entire theory of
protracted social conflicts, as defined by Azar through his ten propositions, as having
22
four main factors which, when satisfied, would qualify a domestic conflict as being a
protracted social conflict (2011). These are:
i) The presence of dissatisfied identity groups3
ii) A deprivation of basic human needs4
iii) A weak centralised state system or unsatisfactory local authorities5
iv) Negative influence from international forces, including both state and non-
state actors6
Regional Conflict Complexes
The theory of regional conflict complexes is also an important analytical tool in
conflict studies and it is a worthwhile theory to discuss and analyse as the ultimate
scope of this dissertation is to apply the theory of protracted social conflict on a regional
basis. Since the theory of protracted social conflicts deals primarily with domestic
conflicts, it is important to utilise a theory which analyses conflicts at the regional level.
‘Regional conflict systems are characterised by their complexity of actors, causes,
structural conditions and dynamics’ (Ansorg: 2011, 174). The whole idea behind
regions, particularly their importance, became popular with the end of the Cold War,
mainly due to the ‘”regionalization” of world politics’ (Ramsbotham et. al: 2011, 112).
Peter Wallensteen uses the term ‘conflict complex’ to describe a set of interconnected
factors which make up a conflict (Wallensteen: 2007, 193). He describes a regional
conflict complex as being a set of interconnections between two separate conflicts
occurring in the same region. These factors come in different forms and all contribute to
3 Emphasised by propositions #2, #4, #5, #6 and #7.
4 Emphasised by propositions #1, #2, #3 and #5.
5 Emphasised by propositions #1, #4, #9 and #10.
6 Emphasised by proposition #8
23
the creation of a regional conflict complex. Furthermore, Wallensteen emphasises that
‘a particular conflict is rarely left alone to be the concern of only the original parties’
(Wallensteen: 2007, 193). Ansorg outlines one of the more distinctive and important
factors as being the presence of a failed state within a region. (Ansorg: 2010). This
would be even more dramatic and problematic if there are several failed states within
the same region stringed together. Such a definition is very similar to the basic factors
behind a protracted social conflict, in the sense that it prompts the interference of
exterior actors in a domestic conflict. Thus it can be argued that a protracted social
conflict can possess a very strong regional dimension. Nadine Ansorg emphasises how:
massive refugee flows and the economic and political weakness of a conflict area, as after the genocide in Rwanda and the war in Burundi in the 1990s, can cause tensions in a whole region (2011, 175).
These types of situations are what make regional conflict complexes, as
ultimately, states within the region vie for their survival when their neighbours collapse
into conflict situations, usually doing so by interfering directly into the state itself. This
idea will become ever more manifest in later chapters.
Yet the main problem with approaches towards regions and regional conflict
complexes is one of perspective. Ansorg emphasises that most scholarly perspectives
into this area take the views of neo-realism and neo-liberalism, mainly because they
focus primarily, and in some cases just, on the state (2011). Yet, this does not mean
that the theory itself is of either a neo-realist or a neo-liberal nature. In this scenario, as
with Azar’s theory, there are other units of analysis which must be consulted, meaning
that the state is not the only unit of analysis. It is no longer only about the dynamics of
the state but also about regional dynamics which make up a regional conflict complex
(Ansorg: 2011, 176). Issues such as ethnicities and their varying interests are issues
which are on the rise and are constant factors in contemporary intrastate and regional
24
conflicts. It is ultimately the interconnection of these varying factors which come to
formulate a regional conflict complex.
Furthermore, the concept of regional conflict complexes has a deep connection
with one of the major factors of protracted social conflict as has been explained; this
being the role of the international system. As has already been outlined, a conflict in a
state could very well prompt its neighbours to interfere. As such, neighbouring states
eventually become important actors within the conflict itself, whether they involve
themselves directly through military interference, or even through arms exports to either
the state or the rebellious groups.
The theories and the case study
The ultimate aim of this dissertation is to bring together the theories described in
this chapter and utilise the case study of the African Great Lakes Region as a medium
through which the theory of protracted social conflicts may adopt a regional dimension.
What will follow after the next chapter on the research methodology is an analysis of the
case study on both historical and contemporary settings. The reasons behind the
choice of these two theories lies within the fact that I feel they are the perfect way of
understanding the current situation in the African Great Lakes. At the same time, I also
feel that the case study itself will lend itself as a perfect example through which the
relevance of both these theories can be expressed. As will be seen in the next
chapters, a conflict such as that of the African Great Lakes is one which simply cannot
be dealt with simply on a domestic level. The regional level is a factor which must be
analysed for a full understanding of the conflict dynamics of the region. Thus, the
research which is being undertaken here will not only assist in a better understanding of
25
the conflict at hand, but it will contribute to a strengthening of the theories by bringing
them together during the discussion of the case study.
The next chapter will now discuss the main research methods which are being
utilised in this dissertation, along with a closer look at the research question which is the
central concern of this research.
26
Chapter 3: The Methodology
As with any research project which is undertaken, it is important to discuss the
methodology which is being put to use in the writing of this dissertation. This chapter
will be focusing on the type of method that will be utilised to carry out the study, whilst at
the same time discussing the method on a more general level. It will also highlight other
possibilities which would have enriched the study, yet were unfeasible.
The Research Question
The focus of this dissertation is an application of the theory of protracted social
conflicts and the theory of regional conflict complexes to the case of the conflict in the
Kivu region of the DRC. The main scope is to prove that it is possible for a protracted
social conflict to take place at a regional level rather than simply at the domestic level.
Thus, the main research question of this dissertation is as follows: Is it possible for a
Protracted Social Conflict to take place on a regional level rather than just at the
domestic level? In order to carry out such a study, the methodological approach chosen
here is the case-study approach, with the specific case study being the conflict in the
African Great Lakes Region. Also, because the research is focused on a conflict which
is still ongoing this research will take 17 October 2012 as the cut-off date, this being the
27
date that Reuters reported that Uganda were assisting the M23 rebel movement,
alongside Rwanda.
The case study approach
The case-study approach is all about tackling the research question by carrying
out a detailed analysis of one or more particular cases which would be relevant to the
research at hand. As quoted by Blaxter, Hughes and Tight, Yin describes the case
study as being ‘the method of choice when the phenomenon under study is not readily
distinguishable from its context’ (2001, 71). Case studies are extremely useful and
amongst the most popular methodological approaches in the social sciences. Case
studies are a perfect way to “illustrate problems or indicate good practices” and, at the
same time, they are useful in the sense that they help link the theoretical aspects of the
field of study with the practical realities of the social world (Blaxter et. al: 2001, 71).
The case study approach has various advantages as well as disadvantages.
Primarily the use of case studies allows for a stronger and more detailed approach
towards the research question and the field of study, and at the same time, they provide
a very flexible approach towards the subject at hand, allowing for more general views
through the use of numerous case studies or focused and detailed studies through a
minimal number of case studies. More importantly, they ‘can provide a date source from
which further analysis can be made’ (Blaxter et. al: 2001, 73). Thus the case-study
approach not only allows for an extensive approach towards the subject; it also allows
for that research to be built upon in the future, thus widening the subject matter for
further investigation later on.
Yet, as with all other methodological approaches, the case-study has its
drawbacks. Primarily, the context created by the case study could very well be
28
confusing in terms of where it begins and ends (Blaxter et. al: 2001, 73). This makes it
very easy for a researcher to delve away from the focus of his research, and fall into
areas which would be considered irrelevant. At the same time, it can prove difficult to
focus only on the most relevant aspects of the case since everything would seem
relevant. Blaxter, Hughes and Tight compare the case-study approach to a Russian
doll, in the sense that ‘each piece of data rests inside another, separate but related’
(2001, 73). Thus it is essential that the researcher be able to establish which pieces of
data are most relevant to his research, and which pieces of data are not as relevant.
On a final note, in relation to case studies, there are various ways in how one
comes to approach the study, and this differs in terms of the number of case studies and
the method in which the case study will be analysed. In this dissertation, a single case
study will be adopted; which is the conflict in the African Great Lakes Region. The case
study approach will be descriptive; as such it will be an approach which will allow a
better method for applying the theory to the case study and thus provide a satisfactory
answer to the research question.
Other methodological options
The case-study approach offers a viable method at approaching the field and the
research question, yet there are various ways in which one could approach the method
of case studies. This could be done by including interviews as an essential part of the
case study’s analysis. Interviews are particularly useful because they may provide
information which would not be readily available in literature. Yet, I found it extremely
difficult to take up this path mainly because there are no experts on the African Great
Lakes Region in Malta. The relative distance between Malta and the region of interest
29
also meant that I could not make direct contact with experts within the region, and this
would make conducting an interview that much harder. My research into this subject is
also limited by the word count I have to adhere to. A lengthier word count would have
definitely allowed me to venture into other case studies around the globe, for
comparative purposes, such as the case of the Balkans.
Despite the outlined limitations however, the case study of the African Great
Lakes allows for a viable approach towards the research question and allows for the
application of the protracted social conflict and the regional conflict complexes theory.
What will now follow is a discussion on the historical factors which have influenced the
contemporary situation in the region, allowing for a much more in-depth look at what
makes the African Great Lakes region such an important case study in the area of
protracted conflicts.
30
Chapter 4: The History of the African Great Lakes
In order to grasp an understanding of the current issues which are present in the
African Great Lakes Region, it is a worthwhile endeavour to explore the history of the
region. The current situation in the African Great Lakes can be attributed to various
historical factors and the conflict dynamics which have developed as a result of these
factors. Understanding the historical realities of any given region is a necessity when it
comes to gaining an understanding of the contemporary situation in that region. In the
case of this dissertation, the contemporary situation in the African Great Lakes is one
which is a direct result of the region’s history, particularly from the moment of
colonisation onwards, as well as the effects of the quick withdrawal by the colonial
powers, particularly in the DRC, Rwanda and Burundi.
The aim of this chapter will be to carry out an analysis of the effects of
colonisation on the region, and how this has played a role in the conflicts which plagued
the region after the Second World War. Through such an analysis, this chapter will help
discern the origins of ethnic turmoil, the realities of poverty and the weaknesses of the
state systems present in the region. At the same time, this chapter will also allow a view
of the influence of external actors within the region, and how these states have come
together at different points to affect developments within the African Great Lakes.
31
The effects of colonisation and independence
‘Scholars argue that the prospect for conflict in a country depends, to a significant
degree, on the type and fairness of its political system. Closed, authoritarian systems
are likely to generate considerable resentment over time, especially if the interests of
some ethnic groups are served at the cost of others’ (Rwantabagu: 2001, 43). As this
section will focus on, it was ultimately the Belgian belief that the Tutsi group was
ethnically superior to the Hutu group that was the catalyst for all the chaos and conflict
which has dominated the African Great Lakes Region. Peter Calvocoressi (2001)
emphasises how the situation in Central Africa as a result of independence was a
unique phenomenon which did not occur throughout the rest of the continent. While
other regions like West Africa and East Africa having become ‘independent without
anything that could be called an international crisis’, the African Great Lakes was a
completely different story, with ‘the independence of the Belgian Congo having
produced not only internal chaos and civil war but also a serious international crisis’
(Calvocoressi: 2001, 639). What is most important to note here is that the
independence of the states in the African Great Lakes was not a smooth process, so
much so that it led to complete chaos. Yet, what is it that makes the African Great
Lakes region so different to the rest of the continent? Part of the blame for the constant
instability since the independence of the various states in the region must fall on the
colonisers themselves. Gérard Prunier (2009) comments that the main issue, which
was prevalent in the entire colonial picture, was that the Europeans could not
understand that what worked for them would not work for Africa. Boundaries in
particular could not be defined in the traditional western sense of the word. Instead,
they were characterised by ‘linguistic, cultural, military, or commercial’ factors, in what
32
was a very ‘delicate cobweb of relationships’ (Prunier: 2009, xxix). In this sense, Prunier
is emphasising that Africa’s borders were not about the politics of states, but really and
truly, this cobweb was all about people differentiating themselves on the basis of the
various factors as previously described. What the colonisers ultimately did was that they
disturbed this cobweb, and doing this would only lead to havoc and instability, as the
population of the African Great Lakes in particular were not used to this kind of political
setup. SIDA argues that before colonisation, ‘interlinked culturally, economically and
politically’ (2004, 98). One of the consequences of this was the Hutu-Tutsi division,
which will be discussed later on. It is this instability which primarily contributed to the
conflicts which have been rampant in the region, particularly the civil wars in Rwanda
and Burundi, and the much larger Second Congo War, which was the most destructive
conflict not only in the region, but in the entire history of Africa.
The African Great Lakes Region was largely characterised with the Belgians as
the main colonisers. Taking into account the four main actors at the centre of this
dissertation’s case study, Uganda is the only case where Belgium was not in control.
Also, since its role differs to that of Rwanda, Burundi and the Congo within the African
Great Lakes, Uganda will be tackled in a separate section later on in this chapter.
Rwanda and Burundi. Originally a German colony, Rwanda became a Belgian
mandate by the end of the First World War, being jointly administered with Burundi
(Calvocoressi: 2001). Independence led to the creation of a Republic in Rwanda and a
Tutsi monarchy in Burundi (Calvocoressi: 2001). As was the case throughout the rest of
the region, the two dominant ethnic groups in Rwanda where the Hutus and the Tutsis
(Lemarchand: 2004). What makes the case of Rwanda so interesting is that it was in
Rwanda that the Hutu-Tutsi conflict was at its most violent form. Prunier defines the
33
Rwandan Genocide of 1994 as having been the ‘catalyst’ which precipitated what would
become known as Africa’s World War and causing the international crisis previously
mentioned (2009, xxxi).
What made the ethnic rivalry between Hutus and Tutsis so strong in both Rwanda
and Burundi was the fact that throughout Belgium’s mandate, the colonisers made it a
point to elevate the Tutsi group above the Hutus, giving the illusion that the former were
ethnically superior to the latter (Calvocoressi: 2001). This meant that the Hutus were
heavily marginalised in society and thus, a natural resentment against the Tutsi started
to rankle. In fact, the Tutsi hegemony only came to an end with the Hutu revolution of
1959, and it can be argued that at this point, the instability in the African Great Lakes
was starting to rear its ugly head (Lemarchand: 2004). The revolution not only allowed
the Hutu to become the dominant ethnic group in Rwanda, but it also led to the exile of
70,000 Tutsi to Uganda, 50’000 Tutsi to Burundi and 25’000 to the Congo (Lemarchand:
2004, 63).7 The refugees who had escaped towards the neighbouring states would
continue to play an important role in Rwanda’s history, particularly in the run-up to the
genocide. The post-independence state of affairs was already showing signs of
instability, with cross-border movements to neighbouring states as well as genocidal
massacres.
The situation in Burundi was both similar and different with regards to the Hutu-
Tutsi rivalry. Lemarchand states that ‘the “premise of inequality” was far less
institutionalized and social relations were more complex’ and ‘ethnic polarization
proceeded at a slower pace’ (2004, 63). What this ultimately means is that unlike in
Rwanda, where the revolution almost immediately meant that the Tutsi would lose their
7 Here, the Congo refers to the territory which was known as the Belgian Congo before having gained
independence. It would go on to become Zaire and then the Democratic Republic of the Congo, as it is known today.
34
grip on power, the case in Burundi was the Tutsi had an opportunity to consolidate their
hold on power. What ultimately occurred was that while there were various attempts by
the Hutu to overthrow the Tutsi, each attempt ended in failure (Lemarchand: 2004). The
final attempt at taking control from the Tutsi in 1972 led to a large scale massacre of
Hutu, ranging from 100,000 to 200,000 people (Lemarchand: 2004).
The Congo. When analysing the colonial history of the Congo, it becomes very
evident that the post-independence situation was arguably the most fragile in the region,
with Prunier stating that the ‘government structure was so rotten that the brush of a hand
could cause it to collapse’ (2009, xxxi). What makes the Congo so important within the
entire context of the African Great Lakes is that it was the Kivu region, in the eastern
region of the Congo, , which was at the centre of the chaos. The Congo fell under the
direct administration of the Belgian King Leopold II during the conference organised by
the International African Association in 1876 (Hochschild: 2001). Until the territory was
transferred to the Belgian state in 1908, it was known as the Congo Free State, with
Leopold II creating ‘a slave labour regime’ in order to take full advantage of the vast
amounts of wild rubber vines, which could be found in the rainforests of the Congo Free
State (Hochschild: 2001, 287).8
The end of the Second World War brought with it the decline of colonial empires
and Belgium was not excluded from this. Independence for the Congo was an
accelerated affair, with Belgium trying to get it over with as fast as it could possibly
manage (Calvocoressi: 2001). Yet the issue here was very evident; the Congolese were
definitely not ready for independence mainly because Belgium had always made it a
8 This regime has led to excessive poverty, since there were very few people left to actually to take up
farming, fishing and hunting. While men were usually sent into the forest to gather quotas of rubber, their women were held prisoners as ‘insurance’.
35
point to restrict any form of education above elementary level to a very reserved minority
of the population. So on 30th June 1960, the Congo became an independent state, and
before the week was even at an end, there were already mutinies taking place in the
army (Calvocoressi: 2001).
What this mutiny primarily did was that it denied the Congolese government a
way to assert its power and authority, and thus this meant that the government was in a
very vulnerable and fragile position. It also had the effect of encouraging Congolese
politician Moise Tshombe to attempt to separate the rich state of Katanga from the rest
of the Congo. Calvocoressi labels Katanga as an important region because its
resources had made it ‘twice as rich as the whole of the rest of the Congo’ since the
Belgian state had taken over the administration of the territory in 1908 (2001, 640).
Losing a region like Katanga was definitely something which the Congo needed to
avoid. The Katanga issue is important mainly because it had brought in not only the
Belgian authorities but also the United Nations. The chaos which was created by the
attempt at secession led to a coup by Colonel Joseph Mobutu in 1965 (SIDA: 2004).
The secession failed after a year yet its effects were felt strongly throughout the entire
country. It was something that the weak state system, which had come into effect after
independence, was not ready for and it immediately led to a collapse. The coup itself
however was obviously not the end of problems, as the country became split between
those who supported it and those who supported the former government (Calvocoressi:
2001). The UN however was successful here, particularly because it was able to control
Belgium and Russia, two states which were both trying to take advantage of the fragility
of the Congo.9 It was also able to keep ‘the Congolese economy going’ and was able to
9 The presence of Belgium and Russia endangered the Congo, and the UN feared that as a result of this,
Africa could develop into a vast Cold War theatre.
36
stave off various civil wars which but not for its presence would have been much worse
(Calvocoressi: 2001, 650). This was the first instance in the region where there was
international involvement, and in this case it was very successful at ensuring that the
situation did not worsen.10 This fact became even more evident because the coup by
Mobutu had taken place only a year after the UN had departed from the region. In 1971,
he renamed the country Zaire (SIDA: 2004).
An important note must be made at this point about ethnicity in Zaire.
Lemerchand (2004) emphasises how the ethnic groupings in the Kivu region were
characterised through three distinctive communities. Firstly, there were the Hutu and
the Tutsi who had settled in Kivu before the creation of the Congo Free State, although
these were not as numerous as in Rwanda and Burundi. Secondly, during colonial rule
itself, there were the ‘descendants of migrant workers, mostly Hutu, brought in from
Rwanda in the 1930s and 1940s’ (Lemerchand: 2004, 63). Finally, after the Hutu
revolution in Rwanda, there were the Tutsi refugees who had escaped from the
neighbouring state. The importance of ethnicity in Zaire is that it shows us how ethnicity
was not simply a domestic concern, but one which encompassed the entire African
Great Lakes and thus, these issues cannot be analysed solely from the domestic point
of view.
What is evident in the cases of Rwanda and Burundi is that from the moment of
independence, the Hutu looked to seize power from the Tutsi, who had been dominating
society from the very beginning of the Belgian mandate. The situations were similar as
the mandate was run on the concept of jointly administrating both Rwanda and Burundi,
10
The UN was able to control the outbreak of civil war, however its departure left the state susceptible to instability and violence.
37
and thus the effects of colonisation were experienced by both states on the same level.
Yet, the difference here becomes evident in the post-independence period, with the
Hutu revolution in Rwanda succeeding almost instantaneously and leading to a
massacre of Tutsi and large scale cross-border movements. Because of all this, ‘its
political system was now inverted, with a small Hutu elite on top of the political power
structure’ (Uvin: 1997, 96). In Burundi, the exact opposite happened, with Hutu
uprisings constantly failing and eventually leading to a very violent massacre of the Hutu
population. Meanwhile the Congo was a situation where the fragility of the state system,
caused primarily by the speed with which the Belgians withdrew from the country,
dictated the way the situation developed. The situation in the Congo had grown so dire
that the United Nations was forced to intervene, and while it had been effective in its
operations, its withdrawal allowed for Colonel Mobutu to take control of the entire state.
Having taken a look at how the Congo/Zaire, Rwanda and Burundi developed
after their independence and the main issues they faced, the focus of this chapter will
now move to one of the most important developments in the region which changed the
whole dimension of the conflict; the Rwandan genocide.
The Rwandan Genocide
‘The genocide took place under the aegis of the state, and Rwandans were the
main actors involved’ (Hitjens: 1999, 241). The spark which led to the flame that is the
genocide was the death of Hutu President Juvenal Habyarimana (Hitjens: 1999). This
led to the biggest genocide the world witnessed since the Holocaust during the Second
World War. Yet, the death of the Rwandan President was not the sole cause of the
genocide. ‘This genocide was the culmination of a four year period during which civil
38
war and extremist violence cost the lives of tens of thousands of persons’ (Uvin: 1997).
Uvin agrees with Prunier (2009) in assessing that this genocide did not only mean
trouble for Rwanda, but it was only ‘the beginning of further violence in Rwanda, Burundi
and Zaire’ (Uvin: 1997). By this point, the African Great Lakes region was plunged into
a sea of instability, from which it has not yet emerged to this present day.
Hitjens defines a genocide as being:
a form of one-sided mass killing in which the state or other authority intends to destroy a group, as that group and membership in it are identified by the perpetrator (1999, 246).
Thus, it is all about one group, defined by certain characteristics which make it
stand out, carrying out the systematic and thorough elimination of another group. The
genocide was ultimately all about the Hutu regime doing what it could to hold on to the
power it had won during the revolution of 1959. Uvin identifies three processes which
contributed to the run-up to the genocide (1997).
Firstly, Rwanda was dominated by internal discontent, and this was present even
amongst the Hutu who had been excluded from political power which had been won as
a result of the revolution. This discontent was also fuelled by the poor quality of
development in the state, as well as widespread corruption (Uvin: 1997).
Secondly, the Tutsi refugees who had escaped to Uganda during the revolution
were causing a very dangerous problem for the Hutu government. In 1990, the Front
Patriotique Rwandais (FPR) invaded Rwanda (Uvin: 1997). Although the government
was able to push the invasion back, the FPR won control of a section of Rwanda’s
territory and the threat became a permanent one (Uvin: 1997). Although a cease-fire
had been agreed between the FPR and the government, the death of the President in
1994 ended the agreement.
39
Finally, the end of the Cold War also led to changes to Rwanda. The Cold War
had brought with it large periods of time where political development had become frozen
in African states, meaning that there were no external pressures for African
governments to democratise (Prunier: 2009). The end of the Cold War however led to
the international community ‘putting strong pressure on the regime to democratize, to
negotiate power sharing with the FPR and the domestic opposition and to organize free
elections’ (Uvin: 108). This led to the advent of political parties in Rwanda, and today, it
is the FPR which is the dominant political party in Rwanda, with its leader Paul Kagame
holding the position of Rwanda’s President.
The irony is that where before independence, it was the Hutu who were
segregated in society, the situation just before the genocide was the complete opposite.
For example, there were various cases were Hutu and Tutsi would intermarry (Hitjens:
1999). Thus, the rivalry between the Hutu and the Tutsi which led up to the genocide
was being strongly exaggerated by the Hutu. This had the effect of placing Hutu in the
list of casualties caused by the genocide, and as one would come to expect, the
genocide was something which would be retained in the memories of Rwandans, as it
was ultimately ‘a hill-by-hill and a home-by-home thing’ (Prunier: 2009, 1).The genocide
had become ‘intertwined with everyday life’ and this reality dominates Rwandan society
to this very day (Prunier: 2009, 3).
One of the worse consequences of this genocide was that the former Hutu
government escaped to Zaire, while great amounts of refugees crossed the borders to
Zaire, Tanzania and Burundi (Prunier: 2009).11 The consequence of these mass
refugee movements was to continue to foster the region’s instability, whilst the Hutu
11
The former Government eventually became known as the Army for the Liberation of Rwanda, or Interahamwe.
40
government’s flight to Zaire led to mass tensions between that state and Rwanda. This
newly-found tension would only be the beginning of a more complex series of events
which would lead to the most deadly conflict in the history of Africa, as will be discussed
later on.
On the international front, the genocide commanded a lot of interest. Prunier
(2009) identifies two distinct reactions from the international community. Firstly, there
was shock at how the Convention on the Prevention of Genocide of 1948 ‘could be
violated in full view of the United Nations and the world’s TV cameras’ (Prunier: 2009,
29). At the same time though, Rwanda was considered to be an unimportant state and
thus, while the genocide did create awareness, the typical man on the street just did not
care (Prunier: 2009, 29). Despite this however, the international community was quick
to provide aid and assistance, primarily setting up refugee camps on the borders of
Rwanda to assist the people, both Tutsi and Hutu who wanted nothing to do with the
genocide, in fleeing the state (Prunier: 2009). Despite this humanitarian aid, no real
action was taken when it came to the issues between Zaire and Rwanda. The reason
behind this was that the UN Security Council was unable to take action due to the
differing views of France and the USA, with the former wishing to take action against
Rwanda and the latter hoping to take action against Zaire (Prunier: 2009).12 Some sort
of action from the Security Council could have prevented the conflict from escalating in
the way it did however this was not to be. Instead it led to two subsequent wars which
would come to dominate the region for the next decade.
12
Since these two states both possess a veto in the UN Security Council, the latter was unable to proceed with setting up a suitable response to the situation in the region.
41
The Two Congo Wars
The causes of the First and Second Congo War are complex and, as has been
seen so far in this chapter, directly attributable to the ethnic tensions and the weak state
systems in the African Great Lakes. Filip Reyntjens (1999) describes the conflicts as
being amalgamations of three conflicts; the civil wars in Angola and Sudan and the
conflict in the African Great Lakes. The focus here will remain on the African Great
Lakes however, as it is impossible to delve into the details of the other two conflicts due
to the constraints and limitations imposed by the word count.
The First Congo War erupted in 1996 and eventually resulted in the overthrowing
of Mobutu’s government and its replacement with the government of Laurent-Désiré
Kabila. The First Congo War was only the first episode of what would become an
international crisis. Its causes were intimately linked to the Rwandan Genocide and its
aftermath, namely the large number of refugees fleeing to Eastern Zaire. Prunier (2009)
emphasises the weakness of the government in Zaire and this ultimately meant that the
Kivu region was an extremely vulnerable region, which could very easily be exploited by
both rebel groups and neighbouring states alike. The position of the Kivu region at the
very centre of the African Great Lakes made it an attractive location for fleeing refugees
not only from Rwanda, but also Burundian refugees, as a result of the 1993 explosion in
Burundi13 (Prunier: 2009, 53). These refugee camps became the mediums through the
Interahamwe started their operations against Rwanda. While this was not the only
cause of the First Congo War, it did set the stage for Rwanda to intervene in Zaire with
the intention of overthrowing Mobutu (Prunier: 2009). At the same time, it would be able
to act against the Interahamwe. Ultimately however, its interests were highly influenced
by the genocide and its military movements into Zaire were meant at ‘countering the
13
Referring to the civil war in Burundi caused by the assassination of the state’s President.
42
military threat posed to the new Rwandese regime by the remnants of the former regime
who were rearming under the cover of the refugee camps’ (Prunier: 2009, 73). The war
set the scenario for the Second Congo War, with Sudan already slowly pressing its
influence into the region, while Uganda joined Rwanda in supporting Kabila in his push
against Mobutu (Prunier: 2009). Burundi’s stance in the war was also anti-Mobutu but
participation was very limited. In 1997, Angola joined the rebel advance due to the
Mobutu government’s relationship with UNITA14 (Prunier: 2009). Ultimately, the result of
the year-long conflict was the downfall of Mobutu’s government and at this point, Zaire
became known as the DRC.
The Second Congo War is considered to have been the most devastating conflict
in the history of Africa. Reyntjens (1999) emphasises how the overthrowing of the
Mobutu Regime in 1997 lead to a backlash involving states both inside the region, as
well as those on its periphery. As stated at the very start of this section, the Second
Congo War was a result of overlapping conflicts which ultimately came together at the
very centre of the African Great Lakes, such as had happened in the First Congo War
(Prunier: 2009).
One of the top reasons why the tensions in the region did not stop with the fall of
the Mobutu regime was primarily because ‘when the anti-Mobutu crusade started,
practically all the countries surrounding what was then Zaire were in a state either of
extreme fragility or even of open conflict’ (Prunier: 2009, 167). As the Second Congo
War started looming on the horizon, these fundamentals had not changed, and thus the
region was still as fragile and unstable as ever. Another reason may be found in the
difference between Mobutu and Kabila, in the sense that Kabila was able in rallying
14
The National Union for the Total Independence of Angola was a constant menace to the Angolan government during most of the post-independence period.
43
allies, particularly after his falling out with both Rwanda and Uganda (Calvocoressi:
2001). These allies included Namibia, Angola and Zimbabwe and eventually the war
broke out between Kabila and these states, joined by various rebel groups; on the one
hand against opposing rebel groups, under the support of Uganda, Burundi and Rwanda
on the other (Calvocoressi: 2001). The conflict lasted from 1998 – 2003, with Kabila
being assassinated in 2001, leading to his son, Joseph Kabila, taking over (Prunier:
2009). This was a key moment as he was ultimately able to make peace deals which
stopped the war both with Uganda and Rwanda, as well as internal rebels (Prunier:
2009).
Where did Uganda stand?
The scope of this section focusing specifically on Uganda is not to give a detailed
history of the state but rather to connect it to the region which this dissertation has thus
far focused on. The situation in Uganda was very different to that in the Congo, Burundi
and Rwanda. While Uganda is part of the African Great Lakes Region, it formed part of
the Commonwealth, as opposed to its Belgian-dominated neighbours in the African
Great Lakes. Despite this however it has been a constant actor in the region,
particularly in the current M23 rebel movements which will be part of the discussion in
the next chapter.
The fact that Uganda was not under Belgian colonisation meant that it followed a
different path to the one followed by Rwanda, Burundi and the Congo. Before Uganda’s
independence in 1962, it had been a British protectorate since 1914 (Calvocoressi:
2001). Yet, it has been an important actor in the African Great Lakes, and this is
primarily because the region has served as a hub for Ugandan rebel groups to attack
44
Uganda through. For this reason alone, Uganda would immediately look to make its
presence felt in favour of its security interests. At the same time, the refugee crises
which have been rampant in the region, as highlighted throughout the entirety of this
chapter, has been something which has directly affected Uganda, to an extent where it
is expected to increase its presence and influence in the region. Its actions today, like
the actions of Rwanda and Burundi, are ultimately connected to the conflicts known as
the two Congo Wars, as these have left an important mark in anything which happens in
the region.
Conclusion
This chapter has focused on the period from the independence of the states
within the African Great Lakes to the end of the Second Congo War in 2003. It is
evident that the contributions of Belgian colonisation on the ethnic rivalries within
Rwanda, Burundi and the DRC, as well as the weaknesses of these state systems after
independence, were major factors in the instability which came to ultimately dominate
the region. It is also noteworthy that at this stage, the conflicts in the region are
exhibiting the signs outlined in this dissertation’s theoretical chapter, thus making these
conflicts exemplary protracted social conflicts. The Hutu-Tutsi rivalry established ethnic
tensions at the very centre of the regional chaos, whilst the weaknesses of the state of
Zaire only served to add fuel to the fire. At the same time, this chaos was causing a
great influx of refugee movements across borders, with the main focus here falling on
the former Rwandan government escaping to Zaire after the genocide and setting up
operations against Rwanda from eastern Zaire. Last, but definitely not least, the
constant intervention by external forces in eastern Zaire only served to further the
45
complexity of the situation and this definitely did not contribute to a quicker peace
process.
The focus of the next chapter will fall on an analysis of the contemporary
situation, and it will look to first determine whether the conflicts in the region still satisfy
the requirements for a protracted social conflict, whilst also looking to apply the theory
on a regional level through the use of the regional conflict complex theory.
46
Chapter 5: The Contemporary Situation
The previous chapter assisted us in gaining an understanding of the kind of
situation which was prevalent in our case study of the African Great Lakes from the end
of the Second World War to the peace agreement which ended the Second Congo War
in 2003. The focus will now shift to the more recent situation in the DRC’s Kivu region,
the roles of Rwanda and Uganda in this region and particularly on the four main issues
which were outlined in the theoretical chapter from Azar’s ten propositions (1985). The
previous chapter has already offered a glimpse into the idea that the conflict in the
African Great Lakes is not simply a domestic conflict, but a regional one with elements
originating Azar’s theory of protracted social conflicts, which in essence, are domestic
conflicts. Thus, this chapter will look to prove that the current situation is in fact a
perfect example of how a protracted social conflict can be defined at the regional level.
Before this analysis however, this chapter will open with a look at the situation after the
end of the Second Congo War.
After the peace process
‘A year after the war in the Democratic Republic of Congo officially ended on 30
June 2003, more than one thousand civilians continued to die every day’ from health
issues, famine and other conditions which came as a result of the Second Congo War
47
(Autesserre: 2007, 423). Practically, the peace process had completely failed and for
this reason, the conflict continued to ravage the Kivu region of the Democratic Republic
of the DRC. Séverine Autesserre (2007) attributes this to persisting conflicts at the local
level and thus, various areas of the region remained very dangerous and unstable. Yet
it is not the only reason behind the protracted conflict situation.
On the regional level, the whole problem can be traced to Uganda and Rwanda
supporting rebel groups in the Kivu region, with Rwandan troops continuing in their
direct activity in the region (Autesserre: 2007). Meanwhile, Prunier (2009) argues that
this was the result of political leaders being unable to turn the ideas behind the peace
process ‘into some kind of reality’ (301). One must also take into account the fact that
the transitional government in the DRC was showing signs of instability, and this left the
state very vulnerable to the issues which were still to be resolved (Prunier: 2009)15. At
the same time, Rwandan presence was still strong in the Kivu primarily because
Rwanda still felt threatened by Hutu militias operating in the region, and it was hoping to
exploit ‘the Kivus' mineral resources’ (Autesserre: 2007, 426). At various points,
Rwanda threatened to invade the Kivu region again to deal with the Hutu militias,
particularly the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), yet these
threats were dismissed both by the UN and the Congolese transitional government itself,
because they simply did not want Rwanda to involve itself in the DRC again for fear of
triggering another regional crisis (Autusserre: 2007).
Thus the peace process, whilst having been successful at downgrading the
intensity and spread of the conflict, was unable to lead to a complete peace within the
region. Ethnic tensions still flourished between Rwanda and Hutu militias in the Kivu,
the weakness of the central Congolese government made the eastern periphery of the
15
Elections did not take place until 2006.
48
state very vulnerable to outside incursion, the presence of rebel groups led to social
issues which the DRC governments could not address effectively because of both its
weakness and its inability to control the national army, and all this, adding as well the
rich mineral resources in the Kivu region, led to both the direct and the indirect
involvement of Uganda and Rwanda in the region.16
Ethnic Dimensions of the Conflict
Through his seventh proposition, Edward Azar emphasises the importance of
identity groups as the most important unit of analysis in a protracted social conflict
(1985). As was emphasised in the previous chapter, conflict in the African Great Lakes
has been greatly influenced by the divide between the Hutu and Tutsi ethnic groups.
Today, this issue is still at the forefront as can be seen through the composition of rebel
groups in the region, such as the FDLR, which is primarily a Burundian Hutu-based
group, as well as the National Congress for the Defence of the People, which is
composed of Tutsi (Human Rights Watch: 2010, UNSC: 2012a). Certainly, the scale of
the conflict today cannot even begin to be compared with the chaos that had gripped the
region in the 1990s as a result of the Hutu-Tutsi rivalry, yet still it is an issue which is
present today on a smaller scale. From the four factors identified in protracted social
conflicts, this is the currently the weakest one as relates to our case study of the African
Great Lakes because as we will see, the other three conflict factors are present on a
much stronger and more evident scale. This contrasts with the previous chapter, where
the principal issues for regional instability were directly related to ethnic rivalries,
16
These social issues included the fact that the government could not provide security to the civilians residing of the Kivu region, and these civilians were in turn experiencing famine, malnutrition and poverty, which the government could not address.
49
particularly between the Hutus and the Tutsis. The ethnic dimension of the current
conflict is ultimately reserved to the fact that certain rebel groups operating in the area
are based specifically on ethnic beliefs. These ethnic beliefs are the product of the
same ethnic issues between the Hutu and the Tutsi which dominated the post-
independence period in the region, as was emphasised in the previous chapter. The
main ethnic issues in the region were reserved to Rwanda and Burundi, and with the
end of the Second Congo War, the role and influence of these ethnic divisions were no
longer as strong on the regional level and thus, they were no longer the main driving
force for the conflict’s intensity. They only serve to give Rwanda a reason to maintain its
strong influence in the eastern regions of the DRC, through the argument that Rwanda
needs to continue striking against the FDLR for the latter’s role in the genocide.
Nevertheless, these groups contribute to the continuation of ethnic divisions in the
region and thus, this is still an issue which is present in the contemporary conflict. As
Azar stated through his second proposition, ethnic divisions ‘are deep-rooted in the lives
and ontological being of those concerned’ (Azar: 1985, 60).
The Deprivation of Human Needs
The deprivation of human needs is arguably the most common theme in Azar’s
ten proposals, mainly because this theme incorporates other factors such as ethnic
divisions and weak state systems; the former because ethnic minorities are usually
subject to maltreatment and the latter because a weak state system means an even
weaker standard of living for the citizens of the state in question. In his ninth
proposition, Edward Azar (1985) emphasised how depriving basic human needs leads
to resentment amongst those whose needs are not being met, thereby making the
50
perfect environment for a conflict to foster, and then erupt further down the road. One of
the biggest concerns in the African Great Lakes today is the giant wave of refugees
dominating the borders of the Kivu region.
As of April 2010 at least 1.8 million people were displaced—the fourth largest internal displacement in the world—1.4 million of whom were in the volatile provinces of North and South Kivu bordering Rwanda (Human Rights Watch: 2010, 5).
The Human Rights Watch report (2010) emphasises how the constant conflict in
the Kivu has led to widespread abuse of human rights and to recurring displacement.
Thus what we have here is not essentially a case where human needs deprivation
causes a conflict to occur, but rather a case where the failure of meeting basic human
needs is caused by the actual conflict. Thus, the deprivation of human needs in this
case is contributing to the increased complexity and prolongation of the conflict. One
must always keep in mind that ‘conflicts fluctuate in intensity over time’ and in the case
of the Kivu region, the conflict’s intensity is increasing because this deprivation of human
needs is not being tackled properly.
When it comes to human rights violations and weak enforcement the DRC
can be considered as being one of the most dangerous states to live in (Foreign Policy:
2012). Since the end of the Second Congo War, famine and disease were amongst the
greatest concerns of the vast majority of the population, and this was mostly a result of
the post-war chaos which was gripping the country (Prunier: 2009). The state has today
been named the ‘rape capital of the world’, with various reports stating ‘that 48 women
are raped every hour’ (Lloyd-Davies: 2011). One of the principal reasons for this chaos
is because the national army is the largest perpetrator for human rights abuses (Veit:
2010). This is because the FDLR frequently mix in with the Congolese population and
more often than not, this ends in disaster for the villagers, leading to the burning down of
the village and the rape of women by the FDLR (Human Rights Watch: 2010). At the
51
same time, people very rarely find refuge with the army since various soldiers are quick
to accuse them of conspiring with the FDLR (Human Rights Watch: 2010).
These human rights violations, rampant throughout the entire state, ultimately
contributed to the conflict’s complexity and longevity (Hovil: 2008). They also add to the
dangers of having a weak centralised state system as well as an inability to control the
national army. This will be discussed in the subsequent section.
The weak centralised state system and state-building
An important aspect in any domestic or regional conflict is ultimately the power of
the central state system. Azar here makes an important point: ‘Conflict is likely to erupt
once again as soon as there is any change in the balance of forces, in leadership, or in
some other significant ecopolitical conditions’ (1985, 60). After the peace agreement in
2003, a transitional government was set up, yet the transition itself was very lengthy and
actual elections were postponed at various times (Prunier: 2009). At the same time, a
draft constitution was written up by Kabila, and this was to be forwarded to a popular
referendum (Prunier: 2009). The result was ‘a resounding triumph for the transition
process’ as the draft constitution was approved (Prunier: 2009, 304). The system
remained weak however and one major problem which was emerging, and is still an
issue to this very day, is the issue of security (Prunier: 2009). The new government was
thus tasked with building up an efficient national army and an effective police force.
However, the latter were very undisciplined, and this automatically led to heightened
social unrest, thus continuing to contribute to the weakness of the central system.
Prunier emphasises the fact that there were ultimately two Congos; on the one hand you
52
had the area ‘which grumbled and complained but lived roughly in peace’ and then there
was the other area, which constantly wondered ‘if the war had really ended’ (2009, 309).
In this situation, one must also consider the effects of the international world,
particularly the United Nations Organization Mission in the DRC (MONUC) and its
international supporters. What was most necessary after the elections was a positive
process of state-building, and in this area, MONUC ‘aspired to erect a stable, liberal
order’ (Veit: 2010, 209). According to Veit (2010), the most powerful institution in state-
building processes is ultimately the armed forces because it is the armed forces which
establishes and defends the state’s monopoly on violence. The top problem in this
respect is that international institutions ultimately favour states institutions and practices
which most resemble their own beliefs, even though these beliefs do not coincide with
what is best for the state in question (Veit: 2010). Nevertheless, the issue of security
was still an important consideration in the entire process of state-building. To this end,
MONUC centred its focus on the Congolese National Army, eventually leading to an
‘intermediary relationship’ between the two sides, with the Army assisting MONUC in
regions the latter could not control due to limited manpower (Veit: 2010, 221). Yet,
eventually problems started to arise mainly because the army was seemingly pursuing
its own hidden agenda when dealing with rebel groups, while also, as was mentioned in
the previous section, being the main source of human rights violations in the entire state
(Veit: 2010).
The most recent development is the army mutiny, which led to the emergence of
the M23 rebel movement, commanded by Colonel Makenga and General Ntaganda
(UNSC: 2012a). As will be emphasised in the next section, this mutiny has been highly
subjected to involvement on the part of both Rwanda and Uganda. Nevertheless, the
53
weakness of the Congolese government can only add to the chaos and instability of the
state’s eastern regions, whilst also giving neighbouring states incentive to get involved.
International influences and involvement
Azar (1985) gives special attention to the effects and influences of external
presence and influence on protracted social conflicts through his eighth proposition.
From the four principal factors of protracted social conflicts, it is this area which is most
pertinent to our case study; mainly because it is the one factor from the four sets of
factors we have been discussing which has had the most impact on conflict in the
African Great Lakes. On the one hand, we must speak on the role of the United
Nations, particularly through MONUC, as well as the roles of Uganda and Rwanda,
especially with regards to their roles in the M23 rebel movement. Thus what we have
here is the presence of an intergovernmental organisation, together with the influence of
two neighbouring states.
During the Second Congo War, there were various state actors involved in the
conflict, many of which were outside the African Great Lakes region, as defined in this
dissertation. By the time of the 2003 peace process, these actors had withdrawn from
the region, yet Rwanda and Uganda were the two actors which continued to involve
themselves in the Eastern regions of the DRC (Prunier: 2009). The latest developments
today have seen the United Nations Security Council accusing both Rwanda and
Uganda of providing assistance and support to the M23 rebel group, and this can be
summed up through Azar, where he stated that ‘in whatever arena the actors behave,
they do so to satisfy their needs’ (1985, 64). Here, the actions of Rwanda and Uganda,
54
particularly with regards to M23, are all directly attributable to their interests in the DRC,
which again mainly revolve around resource exploitation.
Yet, what are the reasons behind Uganda and Rwanda constantly interfering in
the DRC? Prunier (2009) emphasises how President Museveni, the current President of
Uganda, intervened in the Second Congo War and continued to ensure Ugandan
presence thereafter, for two reasons. Firstly, ‘Museveni’ still cherished a certain image
of himself as the elder statesman of eastern and central Africa’ and thus, a successful
war in what used to be Zaire would have ensured that he is seen as an important
figurehead in Africa (Prunier: 2009, 291). Secondly, various officers within the Ugandan
army had important commercial interests in the DRC, mostly exploiting the natural
resources of the Kivu region, and they commanded enough influence to ensure that
Ugandan presence remain in the DRC, even after the war. Meanwhile, Rwanda was
‘the odd man out, the last country trying to hang on to its bloody chunk of the Congo’
(Prunier: 2009, 293). Rwanda was simply not willing to meet the peace, particularly
because the Interahamwe were still operating. From the Rwandan side, the US was
heavily involved as well, trying to promote MONUC while at the same time trying to
assure Rwanda that MONUC would be able to take care of any Interahamwe which
were still active (Prunier: 2009). In this way it attempted to keep Rwanda away from
involving itself in the DRC as much as possible. Thus, the US would ensure Rwanda
would not get involved in the DRC for the sake of fighting the rebel groups.
The UN made an important distinction between Rwanda and Uganda in their
roles within the region. Both states were accused of illegal exploitation of the resources
of the eastern regions of the DRC. Yet the difference lies in the method through which
these resources where exploited, with the Rwandan government actively coordinating
the exploitation, while from Uganda’s side, this was a more private endeavour by various
55
member of the Ugandan military forces (Prunier: 2009). A good example of the latter
case is Operation Lightning Thunder, which was a mission launched by Uganda, the
DRC and Sudan against the LRA in Congolese territory (Matti: 2012). In this set-up, the
DRC decided to contribute a substantial amount of manpower, to the operation, and in
this way, it was able to ensure against any illegal exploitation which could have been
carried out on the part of the Ugandan forces (Matti: 2012). The DRC realised that
certain entities within the Ugandan army would be looking to take advantage of their
presence in the Kivu, and thus the DRC wanted to ensure that it could protect its own
territory not only from the rebel groups, but also from Ugandan interests. As we have
seen in Azar’s sixth proposition, conflictual events overshadow cooperative events,
because the former are more consuming and absorbing. This is shown not only through
the aforementioned operation, where cooperation between the DRC and Uganda was
not wholly successful because the conflict was still creating tensions, but also in the
interview with Rwandan President Paul Kagame (Perry: 2012). In this, Kagame
emphasises that despite the fact that the DRC and Rwanda do command positive
relations between each other at the best of times, the conflict and the region’s instability
ultimately do more harm than good. Thus what we have here is a scenario where
constant involvement from neighbouring states did not allow for a successful transition
from war to peace to take place. Instead, this constant interference prolonged the
conflict, ensuring that it retains its regional dimension.
The regional dimension of protracted social conflicts
The current ongoing conflict in the DRC can be said to fit perfectly within the
parameters of a protracted social conflict. As was seen from his ten propositions in the
56
theoretical chapter, four principal factors were identified which make up the foundations
of this type of conflict. Ethnic divisions and the demands of specific identity groups had
been the hot topic of the region for various decades after the Second World War, but
these died down after the Second Congo War, making this the weakest of the four
conflict factors. Ethnicity is only an issue in the perception of certain rebel groups, yet
other than this, the issue is no longer one of major concern in the region. The
deprivation of human needs is a factor which has been present in the region whenever
conflict was near, and remained a constant presence even during times when conflict
was not as strong. It is this factor which makes the region so notorious for its human
rights violations as well as its instability. The strength and influence of the central
Congolese government under Joseph Kabila is definitely an important aspect when it
comes to the state’s ability to maintain control of a conflict situation, and since the
government’s strength is very weak in the east, the state is essentially very vulnerable
both to rebel groups as well as outside interference. Finally, the most important and
powerful factor is the issue of external interference, because it is this factor which has
not only strengthened the complexity of the conflict in the Kivu region, but is also the
factor which gives the entire situation a strong regional dimension. In this scenario,
Uganda and Rwanda have been heavily involving themselves in the region even after
the other actors involved in the Second Congo War had withdrawn, and today these two
states are accused of supporting the M23 rebel movement within the DRC. At the same
time, one must not forget about the influence of MONUC, which has also been
discussed in this chapter.
One must also keep Burundi in mind. This state has not been mentioned in this
chapter, mainly because the continued conflict in Burundi does not have a spillover
effect into the DRC and thus it is not as relevant to the research as Rwanda and
57
Uganda, both of which are directly involved in the DRC. Nevertheless, SIDA emphasise
that conflict does have opportunities for a regional settlement, and thus, Burundi forms
part of the regional conflict complex of the African Great Lakes in terms of conflict
resolution (2004). Theorists would ultimately agree that the conflict in Burundi does not
really result in the consequences created by the conflict in the Kivu, because the latter is
a much larger reality and has a large amount of international involvement, while Burundi
does not have such involvement on this scale.
What makes this so interesting is the fact that these four factors intertwine and for
this reason, the conflict becomes that much more complex. At the same time, it is
evident that anything which happens in the DRC will in some way or another affect the
greater area of the African Great Lakes. This is what ultimately makes the conflict as
regional as it was social. Domestic conflicts in the region, such as the LRA rebellion in
Uganda, tend to spill over into the DRC and this can only lead to more chaos and
instability. For this reason, as well as other reasons outlined in this chapter, the conflict
is ultimately a regional one, yet it is one which carries all the evidence of a protracted
social conflict. Arguably, it is the regional dimension of this conflict which makes it
protracted and thus, it is a dimension which certainly must be at the forefront of any
research on the region.
58
Conclusion
The ultimate aim of this dissertation has been to discuss the current ongoing
conflict in the African Great Lakes Region through the lens of the protracted social
conflict theory and the theory of regional conflict complexes, thus offering a new
perspective into the issues the region is currently facing. Through this discussion, this
dissertation sets out to answer the question of whether protracted social conflicts could
adopt a regional dimension. The reason behind adopting this choice of theories is
because on the one hand, the conflicts in the African Great Lakes have constantly
played a role in creating a much larger conflict spanning the entire region, which is
where the theory of regional conflict complexes allows us to gain a better understanding
of the regional dynamics of the conflict itself. The single case study adopted for this aim
was the conflict in the African Great Lakes, focusing on the historical situations which
led to the contemporary conflict, whilst also discussing how this conflict has progressed
since the end of the Second Congo War and how it relates to the theory of protracted
social conflicts. This was done through the four factors which were outlined from
Edward Azar’s ten proposals.
This dissertation has most importantly found that the conflict in the African Great
Lakes is in fact a protracted regional conflict, where all the requirements for a protracted
social conflict are not only met on the domestic level but also on the regional level.
From the preceding two chapters on the history of the region and on the contemporary
situation, it can be concluded that the conflict in the African Great Lakes can never be
confined to only the DRC, because Rwanda and Uganda will always find that whatever
happens in the DRC will come to affect them in some way or another. This has been
59
emphasised by Uganda’s interest in the DRC’s natural resources as well as its role,
along with Rwanda, in assisting the M23 rebel group.
Some weaknesses can be noted in this dissertation. Primarily, it would have
been worthwhile to obtain interviews in order to obtain information which would not have
been available in the literature. However, as was mentioned in the methodology
chapter, this was not possible due the various constraints outlined. Also, due to the
limitations imposed by the word count, the research had to be limited to certain areas of
the case study, as there are certainly more areas which would have contributed to the
fulfilment of the research question.
This dissertation is also aimed at encouraging further research into the African
Great Lakes. As was seen in the literature review, there is already a good amount of
literature on the subject; however there are a lot of opportunities for further research.
Primarily the research of this dissertation could be improved upon through the utilisation
of interviews, either with experts in the field, or with people who are active in the area,
such as aid workers or UN workers, who are much closer to the conflict and can thus
provide the researcher with a much more detailed account on the everyday situation.
Another option would have been to add another case study to the research, and thus
carry out a comparative analysis which would have certainly aided in emphasising the
relevance of the theories concerned with this dissertation. Furthermore, research into
areas such as the UN’s role in the conflict and into its diplomatic methods in attempting
to pacify the situation can be carried out. This would definitely not only contribute to
enriching the literature currently available on the subject, but could also assist towards
the negotiation of a lasting peace through an analysis of possible routes which peace
talks could take. One could also focus their research on the role of the African Union,
60
which was not explored in this dissertation, as well as on humanitarian aid in the region,
which certainly commands a good deal of research on its own.
Ultimately, the scope of this dissertation is not only to prove that protracted social
conflicts can take up a regional dimension, but also to encourage new research into this
area of international relations. Research should never be confined to separate areas of
the world, but should instead tackle the vast amount of areas and subjects which make
up an integral part of the discipline. Being perhaps the most unstable continent in the
world today, Africa will certainly benefit from increased research into the tribulations it
faces on a daily basis.
61
Bibliography
Ansorg, N. (2010). Regional war systems – A challenge for peace and conflict studies.
In: Free University of Berlin, 3rd ECPR Graduate Conference. Dublin, Ireland 30 August
to 1 September 2010. Berlin: Free University of Berlin.
Ansorg, N. (2011). How Does Militant Violence Diffuse in Regions? Regional Conflict
Systems in International Relations and Peace and Conflict Studies. International Journal
of Conflict and Violence. 5 (1), 173-187.
Azar, E. (1985). Protracted International Conflicts: Ten Propositions. International
Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations. 12 (1), 59-
70.
Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. & Tight, M. (2001). How to Research, 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open
University Press.
Calvocoressi, P (2001). World Politics 1945 - 2000. 8th ed. London: Pearson Education
Limited.
62
Daley, P. (2006). Challenges to Peace: Conflict Resolution in the Great Lakes Region of
Africa. Third World Quarterly. 27 (2), 303-319.
Emizet, K. N. F. (2000). The Massacre of Refugees in Congo: A Case of UN
Peacekeeping Failure and International Law. The Journal of Modern African Studies. 38
(2), 163-202.
Hitjens, H.M. (1999). Explaining the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda. The Journal of Modern
African Studies, 37 (2), 241-286.
Hovil, L. (2008). The inter-relationship between violence, displacement and the transition
to stability in the Great Lakes Region. In: CSVR (The Centre for the Study of Violence
and Reconciliation), Violence and Transition Project Roundtable. Johannesburg, South
Africa 7-9 May 2008.
Human Rights Watch, (2010). Always on the Run: The Vicious Cycle of Displacement.
New York: Human Rights Watch.
Lemarchand, R. (2004). Exclusion, Marginalization and Political Mobilization: The Road
to Hell in the Great Lakes. In: Wimmer, A., Goldstone, R.J., Horowitz, D.L., Joras, U. &
Schetter, C. Facing Ethnic Conflicts. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Matti, S. (2012). In Pursuit of the Lord's Resistance Army: How to Deter Illegal Resource
Extraction by Ugandan Forces. AfricaToday. 59 (1).
63
Perry, A. (2012). Q&A: Rwandan President Paul Kagame. [online] Available at: <
http://world.time.com/2012/09/14/qa-rwandan-president-paul-kagame/> [Accessed 10
November 2012].
Prunier, G. (2009). Africa’s World War: Congo, the Rwandan Genocide, and the Making
of a Continental Catastrophe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T. & Miall, H. (2011). Contemporary Conflict Resolution.
3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Reuters, (2012). Exclusive: Rwanda, Uganda arming Congo rebels, providing troops –
U.N. panel. [online] Available at: < http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/17/us-congo-
democratic-rwanda-uganda-idUSBRE89F1RQ20121017> [Accessed 6 November 2013]
Reyntjens, F. (1999). Briefing: The Second Congo War: More than a Remake. African
Affairs, 98, 241-250.
Rwantabagu, H. (2001). Explaining Intra-State Conflicts in Africa: The Case of Burundi,
International Journal on World Peace, 18 (2), 41-53.
SIDA. (2004). A Strategic Conflict Analysis for the Great Lakes Region, Division for
Eastern and Western Africa, s.l., s.n.
64
Sullivan, P.D. (2005). The Missing Pillars: A Look at the Failure of Peace in Burundi
through the Lens of Arend Lijphart's Theory of Consociational Democracy, The Journal
of Modern African Studies, 43 (1), 75-95.
The Group of Experts. (2012a). Interim Report Concerning the Democratic Republic of
the Congo, New York: United Nations Security Council.
The Group of Experts. (2012b). Addendum to the Interim Report Concerning the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, New York: United Nations Security Council.
Uvin, P. (1997). Prejudice, Crisis and Genocide in Rwanda. African Studies Review. 40
(2), 91-115.
Veit, A. (2010). Intervention as Indirect Rule: Civil War and Statebuilding in the
Democratic Republic of Congo. Frankfurt: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek.
Vorrath, J. (2011). Political Trends in the African Great Lakes, Washington: United
States Institute for Peace.
Wallensteen, P. (2007). Understanding Conflict Resolution. 2nd ed. London: SAGE
Publications Ltd..