Harmonic mappings for which co-analytic part is a close-to-convex function of order b

8
Polato ˜ glu et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:18 DOI 10.1186/s13660-014-0543-x RESEARCH Open Access Harmonic mappings for which co-analytic part is a close-to-convex function of order b Ya¸ sar Polato ˜ glu 1 , Yasemin Kahramaner 2 and Melike Aydogan 3* * Correspondence: [email protected] 3 Department of Mathematics, Isik University, Sile Campus, ˙ Istanbul, Turkey Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Abstract In the present paper we investigate a class of harmonic mappings for which the second dilatation is a close-to-convex function of complex order b, b C/{0} (Lashin in Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 34(7):1101-1108, 2003). MSC: 30C45; 30C55 Keywords: harmonic mappings; complex dilatation; distortion theorem; growth theorem 1 Introduction A planar harmonic mapping in the open unit disc D = {z||z| <} is a complex-valued har- monic function f which maps D onto some planar domain f (D). Since D is a simply con- nected domain, the mapping f has a canonical decomposition f = h(z)+ g (z), where h(z) and g (z) are analytic in D and have the following power series expansions: h(z)= n= a n z n , g (z)= n= b n z n , z D, where a n , b n C, n = , , , .... As usual, we call h(z) analytic part and g (z) co-analytic part of f , respectively. An elegant and complete account of the theory of planar harmonic mappings is given in Duren?s monograph []. Lewy [] proved in that the harmonic mapping f is locally univalent in D if and only if its Jacobian J f = |h (z)| |g (z)| is different from zero in D. In view of this result, locally univalent harmonic mappings in the open unit disc are either sense- reversing if |g (z)| > |h (z)| or sense-preserving if |g (z)| < |h (z)| in D. Throughout this pa- per, we restrict ourselves to the study of sense-preserving harmonic mappings. We also note that f = h(z)+ g (z) is sense-preserving in D if and only if h (z) does not vanish in the unit disc D, and the second dilatation w(z)= g (z)/h (z) has the property |w(z)| < in D. The class of all sense-preserving harmonic mappings in the open unit disc D with a = b = and a = is denoted by S H . Thus S H contains the standard class S of analytic univalent functions. The family of all mappings f S H with the additional property that g () = , i.e., b = , is denoted by S H . Thus it is clear that S S H S H []. Let be the family of functions φ(z) regular in the open unit disc D and satisfying the conditions φ() = , |φ(z)| < for all © 2015 Polato ˜ glu et al.; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Transcript of Harmonic mappings for which co-analytic part is a close-to-convex function of order b

Polatoglu et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:18 DOI 10.1186/s13660-014-0543-x

R E S E A R C H Open Access

Harmonic mappings for which co-analyticpart is a close-to-convex function of order bYasar Polatoglu1, Yasemin Kahramaner2 and Melike Aydogan3*

*Correspondence:[email protected] of Mathematics, IsikUniversity, Sile Campus, Istanbul,TurkeyFull list of author information isavailable at the end of the article

AbstractIn the present paper we investigate a class of harmonic mappings for which thesecond dilatation is a close-to-convex function of complex order b, b ∈C/{0} (Lashinin Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 34(7):1101-1108, 2003).MSC: 30C45; 30C55

Keywords: harmonic mappings; complex dilatation; distortion theorem; growththeorem

1 IntroductionA planar harmonic mapping in the open unit disc D = {z||z| < } is a complex-valued har-monic function f which maps D onto some planar domain f (D). Since D is a simply con-nected domain, the mapping f has a canonical decomposition f = h(z) + g(z), where h(z)and g(z) are analytic in D and have the following power series expansions:

h(z) =∞∑

n=

anzn, g(z) =∞∑

n=

bnzn, z ∈D,

where an, bn ∈ C, n = , , , . . . . As usual, we call h(z) analytic part and g(z) co-analyticpart of f , respectively. An elegant and complete account of the theory of planar harmonicmappings is given in Duren?s monograph [].

Lewy [] proved in that the harmonic mapping f is locally univalent in D ifand only if its Jacobian Jf = |h′(z)| – |g ′(z)| is different from zero in D. In view ofthis result, locally univalent harmonic mappings in the open unit disc are either sense-reversing if |g ′(z)| > |h′(z)| or sense-preserving if |g ′(z)| < |h′(z)| in D. Throughout this pa-per, we restrict ourselves to the study of sense-preserving harmonic mappings. We alsonote that f = h(z) + g(z) is sense-preserving in D if and only if h′(z) does not vanish inthe unit disc D, and the second dilatation w(z) = g ′(z)/h′(z) has the property |w(z)| < in D.

The class of all sense-preserving harmonic mappings in the open unit disc D with a =b = and a = is denoted by SH. Thus SH contains the standard class S of analyticunivalent functions.

The family of all mappings f ∈ SH with the additional property that g ′() = , i.e., b = ,is denoted by S

H. Thus it is clear that S ⊂ SH ⊂ SH []. Let � be the family of functions

φ(z) regular in the open unit disc D and satisfying the conditions φ() = , |φ(z)| < for all

© 2015 Polatoglu et al.; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproductionin any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Polatoglu et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:18 Page 2 of 8

z ∈D. We denote by P the family of functions p(z) = + pz + pz + · · · regular in D suchthat p(z) in P if and only if

p(z) = + φ(z) – φ(z)

(.)

for some φ(z) ∈ � and every z ∈D.Let s(z) = z + cz + cz + · · · and s(z) = z + dz + dz + · · · be analytic functions in D.

If there exists a function φ(z) ∈ � such that s(z) = s(φ(z)) for every z ∈ D, then we saythat s(z) is subordinate to s(z) and we write s ≺ s. We also note that if s ≺ s, thens(D) ⊂ s(D) [, ].

Next, let A be the class of functions s(z) = z + ez + · · · which are analytic in D. A func-tion s(z) in A is said to be a convex function of complex order b, b ∈ C/{}, that is,s(z) ∈ C(b) if and only if s′(z) �= , and

Re

( +

b

zs′′(z)s′(z)

)> (z ∈ D). (.)

We denote by S∗( – b) the class of A consisting of functions which are starlike of com-plex order b, that is,

Re

( +

b

(z

s′′(z)s′(z)

– ))

> (z ∈D). (.)

Moreover, let s(z) be an element of A, then s(z) is said to be close-to-convex of complexorder b, b ∈ C/{} if and only if there exists a function ϕ(z) ∈ C(b) satisfying the condi-tion

Re

( +

b

(s′(z)ϕ′(z)

– ))

> (z ∈D). (.)

The class of such functions is denoted by CC(b).The classes C(b) and S∗( – b) were introduced and studied by Nasr and Aouf [, ], and

the class CC(b) was introduced by Lashin [].

Remark .(i) For b = we obtain S∗() = S∗, C() = C , and CC() = CC are well-known classes of

starlike, convex and close-to-convex functions, respectively [].(ii) S∗( – ( – α)) = S∗(α), C( – α), and CC( – α), ≤ α < , are the classes of starlike,

convex and close-to-convex functions of order α, respectively [].(iii) If we take b = e–iλ cosλ, |λ| < π/, we obtain the following classes: λ-spirallike,

analytic functions for which zf ′(z) is λ-spirallike and λ-spirallike and λ-spiralclose-to-convex functions [].

(iv) S∗( – ( – α)e–iλ cosλ), C∗(( – α)e–iλ cosλ), CC∗(( – α)e–iλ cosλ), ≤ α < ,|λ| < π/, are the classes of λ-spirallike functions of order α, analytic functions forwhich zf ′(z) is λ-spirallike of order α and λ-spiral close-to-convex functions oforder α, respectively [].

Polatoglu et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:18 Page 3 of 8

Finally, the aim of this investigation is to obtain some properties of the class of harmonicfunctions defined by

SHCC(b) ={

f = h(z) + g(z)∣∣∣w(z) =

g ′(z)h′(z)

≺ b + (b – )z

– z

⇔ Re

[ +

b

(g ′(z)h′(z)

– b

)]> , b, b ∈C/{}, h(z) ∈ C(b)

}

for all z in D.For the purpose of this paper, we need the following lemma and theorem.

Lemma . [] Let φ(z) be regular in the unit disc D with φ() = . If the maximum valueof |φ(z)| on the circle |z| = r < is attained at point z, then we have zφ

′(z) = kφ(z) forsome k ≥ .

Theorem . [] If s(z) ∈ C(b), then

[

+b

(z

s′(z)s(z)

– )]

– = p(z) = + φ(z) – φ(z)

for some φ(z) ∈ � and every z in D, and

∫ π

Re

(z

s′(z)s(z)

)dθ = pnπ (.)

for every z ∈ D. A member of S∗(p, n) is called p-valent starlike function in the unit disc D.

Finally, a planar harmonic mapping in the open unit disc D is a complex-valued har-monic function f , which maps D onto some planar domain f (D). Since D is a simply con-nected domain, the mapping f has a canonical decomposition f = h + g , where h(z) andg(z) are analytic in D and have the following power series expansion:

h(z) = zp + anp+znp+ + anp+znp+ + · · · + anp+mznp+m + · · ·

and

g(z) = bnpznp + bnp+znp+ + bnp+znp+ + · · · + bnp+mznp+m + · · · ,

where |bnp| < , p ≥ and n ≥ are integers, anp+m, bnp+m ∈ C and every z ∈ D. As usual,we call h(z) the analytic part and g(z) the co-analytic part of f , respectively, and let theclass of such harmonic mappings be denoted by SH(p, n). Lewy [] proved in that theharmonic mapping f is locally univalent in D if and only if its Jacobian Jf = |h′(z)| – |g ′(z)|is strictly positive in D. In view of this result, locally univalent harmonic mappings in theopen unit disc are either sense-reversing if |g ′(z)| > |h′(z)| or sense-preserving if |g ′(z)| <|h′(z)| in D. Throughout this paper, we restrict ourselves to the study of sense-preservingharmonic mappings. We also note that an elegant and complete treatment theory of theharmonic mapping is given in Duren?s monograph [].

Polatoglu et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:18 Page 4 of 8

The main aim of this paper is to investigate some properties of the following class:

S∗H(p, n) ={

f = h + g ∈ SH(p, n)∣∣∣w(z) =

g ′(z)h′(z)

≺ bnp + φ(z) – φ(z)

,

φ(z) = znψ(z),ψ(z) ∈ �, h(z) ∈ S∗(p, n), z ∈D

}

and for this aim we need the following lemma.

Lemma . [] Let w(z) = anzn + an+zn+ + an+zn+ + · · · (an �= , n ≥ ) be analytic in D.If the maximum value of |w(z)| on the circle |z| = r < is attained at z = z, then we havezw′(z) = pw(z), where p ≥ n and every z ∈D.

2 Main resultsLemma . Let h(z) be an element of C(b), then

F

(|b|,

Re b, –r

)≤ ∣∣h(z)

∣∣ ≤F

(|b|,

Re b, r

)(.)

and

F(|b|, Re b, –r

) ≤ ∣∣h′(z)∣∣ ≤F

(|b|, Re b, r), (.)

where

F

(|b|,

Re b, –r

)=

( + r)|b|–Re b

( – r)|b|+Re b (.)

and

F(|b|, Re b, r

)=

( + r) |b|–

Re b

( – r) |b|+

Re b. (.)

These inequalities are sharp because the extremal function is h(z) = (–z)b with z = r(r– b

b )/

–r( bb )/

.

Proof Using Theorem ., the definition of class C(b) and the definition of the subordina-tion principle, we obtain

zh′(z)h(z)

= + (b – )φ(z)

– φ(z)⇒ z

h′(z)h(z)

≺ + (b – )z – z

or∣∣∣∣z

h′(z)h(z)

–br

– r

∣∣∣∣ ≤ |b|r – r , (.)

and similarly

zh′′(z)h′(z)

=bφ(z) – φ(z)

⇒ zh′′(z)h′(z)

≺ bz – z

Polatoglu et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:18 Page 5 of 8

or

∣∣∣∣zh′′(z)h′(z)

–br

– r

∣∣∣∣ ≤ |b|r – r . (.)

Using (.) and (.), we get (.) and (.), respectively. �

Theorem . Let f = h(z) + g(z) be an element of SHCC(b), then

g(z)h(z)

≺ b + (b – )z

– z(z ∈D).

Proof Since f = h(z) + g(z) is an element of SHCC(b), then we have

g ′(z)h′(z)

≺ b + (b – )z

– z⇔ Re

[ +

b

(g ′(z)h′(z)

– b

)]> ,

so

g ′(z)h′(z)

= b + (b – )φ(z)

– φ(z)(.)

for some φ(z) ∈ � and every z in D. Now, we define the function φ(z) by

g(z)h(z)

= b + φ(z) – φ(z)

(z ∈ D),

then φ(z) is analytic in D and g(z)h(z) |z= = b = b

+φ()–φ() , then φ() = and

w(z) =g ′(z)h′(z)

= b

( + φ(z) – φ(z)

+zφ(z) – φ(z)

· + (b – )φ(z)

)(z ∈D).

Now it is easy to realize that the subordination g′(z)h′(z) ≺ b

+(b–)z–z is equivalent to |φ(z)| <

for all z ∈ D. Indeed, assume to the contrary, that there exists z ∈ D such that |φ(z)| = .Then by Jack?s lemma (Lemma.), zφ

′(z) = kφ(z), k ≥ , for such z ∈D, we have

w(z) =g ′(z)h′(z)

= b

( + φ(z) – φ(z)

+kφ(z) – φ(z)

· + (b – )φ(z)

)= w

(φ(z)

)/∈ w(D)

because |φ(z)| = and k ≥ . But this is a contradiction to the condition g′(z)h′(z) ≺ b

+(b–)z–z ,

and so assumption is wrong, i.e., |φ(z)| < for all z ∈ D. �

Corollary . Let f = h(z) + g(z) be an element of SHCC(b), then

F

(|b|,

Re b, –r

) |b| – |b|r – |b – b|r

– r

≤ ∣∣g(z)∣∣ ≤F

(|b|,

Re b, r

) |b| + |b|r + |b – b|r

– r (.)

Polatoglu et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:18 Page 6 of 8

and

F(|b|, Re b, –r

) |b| – |b|r – |b – b|r

– r

≤ ∣∣g ′(z)∣∣ ≤F

(|b|, Re b, r) |b| + |b|r + |b – b|r

– r (.)

for all |z| = r < , where F and F are defined by (.) and (.), respectively.

Proof Since f = h(z) + g(z) ∈ SHCC(b), we have

Re

[ +

b

(g ′(z)h′(z)

– b

)]> ⇔ g ′(z)

h′(z)≺ b

+ (b – )z – z

or∣∣∣∣

g ′(z)h′(z)

–b + (b – b)r

– r

∣∣∣∣ ≤ |b|r – r ,

then

|b| – |b|r – |b – b|r

– r ≤ |g ′(z)||h′(z)| ≤ |b| + |b|r + |b – b|r

– r , (.)

and using Theorem . we obtain

∣∣∣∣g(z)h(z)

–b + (b – b)r

– r

∣∣∣∣ ≤ |b| – r

or

|b| – |b|r – |b – b|r

– r ≤ |g(z)||h(z)| ≤ |b| + |b|r + |b – b|r

– r (.)

for all |z| = r < . Considering Lemma ., (.) and (.) together, we obtain (.) and(.). �

Lemma . If f = h(z) + g(z) ∈ SHCC(b), then

|b| – r + |b|r ≤ ∣∣w(z)

∣∣ ≤ |b| + r + |b|r , (.)

( – r)( – |b|)( + |b|r) ≤ –

∣∣w(z)∣∣ ≤ ( – r)( – |b|)

( – |b|r) , (.)

( – r)( + |b|) – |b|r ≤ +

∣∣w(z)∣∣ ≤ ( + r)( + |b|)

+ |b|r (.)

and

( – r)( – |b|) + |b|r ≤ –

∣∣w(z)∣∣ ≤ ( + r)( – |b|)

– |b|r (.)

for all |z| = r < .

Polatoglu et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:18 Page 7 of 8

Proof Since f = h(z) + g(z) ∈ SHCC(b), it follows that

w(z) =g ′(z)h′(z)

=b + bz + · · · + az + · · · so w() = b and

∣∣w(z)∣∣ < .

So, the function

φ(z) =w(z) – w() – w()w(z)

=w(z) – b

– bw(z)(z ∈D)

satisfies the conditions of Schwarz lemma. Therefore, we have

w(z) =b + φ(z) + bφ(z)

if and only if w(z) ≺ b + z + bz

(z ∈D).

On the other hand, the linear transformation b+z+bz maps |z| = r onto the disc with the cen-

ter C(r) = ( (–r) Re b–|b|r , (–r) Im b

–|b|r ) and the radius ρ(r) = (–|b|)r–|b|r . Then we have (.), which

gives (.), (.) and (.). �

Corollary . Let f (z) be an element of SHCC(b), then

( – r)( – |b|)

( + |b|r)

(F

(|b|, Re b, –r)) ≤ Jf ≤ ( – r)( – |b|)

( – |b|r)

(F

(|b|, Re b, r))

and

( – |b|

)∫ r

– ρ

+ |b|ρF(|b|, Re b, –ρ

)dρ

≤ |f | ≤ ( + |b|

) ∫ r

+ ρ

+ |b|ρF(|b|, Re b,ρ

)dρ

for all |z| = r < , where F is defined by (.).

Proof Since

( –

∣∣w(z)∣∣)∣∣h′(z)

∣∣ ≤ Jj ≤( +

∣∣w(z)∣∣)∣∣h′(z)

∣∣

and

( –

∣∣w(z)∣∣)∣∣h′(z)

∣∣|dz| ≤ |df | ≤ ( +

∣∣w(z)∣∣)∣∣h′(z)

∣∣|dz|,

thus using Lemma . and Lemma . in the last two inequalities we obtain the desiredresult. �

Theorem . Let f (z) be an element of SHCC(b), then

n∑

k=

|bk – bak| ≤n–∑

k=

∣∣bk + b(b – )ak∣∣.

Polatoglu et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:18 Page 8 of 8

Proof Using Theorem ., we obtain the following relation:

g(z)h(z)

≺ b + (b – )z

– z⇒ g(z)

h(z)=

b + b(b – )φ(z) – φ(z)

or

g(z) – bh(z) =(g(z) + b(b – )h(z)

)φ(z)

(z ∈D,φ(z) ∈ �

). (.)

Equality (.) can be written in the following form:

n∑

k=

(bk – bak)zk +∞∑

k=n+

dkzk =

( n–∑

k=

(bk + b(b – )ak

)zk

)φ(z) (z ∈D). (.)

Since the last equality has the form f(z) = f(z)φ(z) with |φ(z)| < , it follows that

π

∫ π

∣∣f(reiθ )∣∣ dθ ≤

π

∫ π

∣∣f(reiθ )∣∣ dθ (.)

for each r ( < r < ). Expressing (.) in terms of the coefficients in (.), we obtain theinequality

n∑

k=

|bk – bak|rk +∞∑

k=n+

|dk|rk ≤n–∑

k=

∣∣bk + b(b – )ak∣∣rk , (.)

where dk = (bk – bak) – (bk + b(b – )ak)φ(z). By letting r → – in (.) we obtain thedesired result. The proof of this method is due to Clunie []. �

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors? contributionsAll authors contributed equally and significantly to writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author details1Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Istanbul Kültür University, Istanbul, Turkey. 2Department ofMathematics, Istanbul Commerce University, Üsküdar Campus, Istanbul, Turkey. 3Department of Mathematics, IsikUniversity, Sile Campus, Istanbul, Turkey.

Received: 27 October 2014 Accepted: 22 December 2014

References1. Duren, P: Harmonic Mappings in the Plane. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 156. Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge (2004)2. Lewy, H: On the non-vanishing of the Jacobian in certain in one-to-one mappings. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 42, 689-692

(1936)3. Goodman, AW: Univalent Functions, vol. I. Mariner Publishing, Tampa (1983)4. Goodman, AW: Univalent Functions, vol. II. Mariner Publishing, Tampa (1983)5. Nasr, MA, Aouf, MK: On convex functions of complex order. Mansoura Sci. Bull. 9, 565-582 (1982)6. Nasr, MA, Aouf, MK: Starlike function of complex order. J. Nat. Sci. Math. 25(1), 1-12 (1985)7. Lashin, AY: Starlike and convex functions of complex order involving a certain linear operator. Indian J. Pure Appl.

Math. 34(7), 1101-1108 (2003)8. Jack, IS: Functions starlike and convex of order α . J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 3, 469-474 (1971)9. Polatoglu, Y, Bolcal, M, Sen, A: The radius of starlikeness for convex functions of complex order. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.

2004(45), 2423-2428 (2004)10. Clunie, J: On meromorphic schlicht functions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 34, 215-216 (1959)