Focus Group - Sample
Transcript of Focus Group - Sample
GS/HRM 6600
FOCUS GROUPS
By:
Michael Burzynski Daryn Dyer Eni Gjermeni Larry Indovina Mandana KhandanCyrus Paykar
AGENDA
History / EmergenceOverview Data Analysis & InterpretationMethodology & ApplicationAdvantages Limitations Conclusion References
FOCUS GROUPS
Operational Definition
A focus group is a small group discussion in which participants respond to a series of questions focused on a specific topic. A skilled facilitator typically meets with five to twelve people to collect in depth qualitative information about the group’s ideas, perceptions, attitudes, and experiences on the defined topic
(Subramony, Lindsay, Middlebrook, & Foose, 2002)
History/Emergence
Origins of Focus Groups
Focus group methodology emerged in the social science filed
Bronislaw Malinowski (left) cultural anthropologist and native Trobriand Islanders
Street corner society, William Foote Whyte employed group interviews with gang members in Boston
Early Focus Groups
History/Emergence Cont’d
Paul Lazarfeld and Robert Merton and media’s impact on people’s attitudes towards the
involvement of the U.S. in World War II.
Groups of individuals listening and responding to pro war radio programmes were observed.
Social Sciences, since 1941
Paul Lazarfeld
Robert Merton
History/Emergence Cont’d
In 1960’s Market Research Focus Groups
Example: New Coke
1960’s Market Research and 1980’s Sciences
In 1980’s • Focus groups re-gained popularity again in the 1980s in the fields of Health and Social Sciences
Overview of Focus Groups
Focus Group discussions duration: 1 to 2 hours
Limited number of participants Single or Multiple meetings
FOCUS GROUP STRUCTURE
Role of “Moderator””Facilitates discussionEngages participants in exercises : •team-building •brainstorming
Presents materials (i.e. newspaper article, video clip, or audio clip)Asks questions and probes
Role of “Note-Taker”” • Records session (notes, audio, or videotape)• Records observations • Assists moderator in verifying, analyzing and
interpretation of data
Characteristics of “Participants” or Group• Randomly selected • Homogeneous in various aspects (i.e.: ethnicity, language,
literacy levels, income and gender)
Types of Focus Groups
Focus Groups Types Client participant focus group Two-way focus group Mini Focus group Dueling- moderator focus groups Respondent moderator focus group Two way mirror
Types of Focus Groups Cont’d
Modern-day Focus GroupsOnline (virtual) focus group Participants share information and responses via computer Typically include a moderator, participant, and an observer
Teleconference focus group Participants from different geographic locations Time efficient Group’s body language interaction is limited
Focus Group Interview Questions
Characteristics of Questions Five to six Short Open ended One-dimensional Clear
5 Types of Questions Opening questions Introductory Questions Transition Questions Key Questions Ending Questions
Analysis/Interpretation of Data
Indexing Reading session notes and assigning codes or “labels” Link together pieces of info which represent a common
viewpoint
Management Assembling together data with the same code or label Methods of data management:
• Organizing responses and compiling them into similar clusters
• Use of software specifically designed for analysis of qualitative data
Interpretation Analytic Induction
Application in Research
Determine Market needs Evaluate opinions Employee engagement (Human Resources)
Generate or introduce new ideas, products, services
(Gain insights)
Focus Groups
Focus Groups
Yes!
Focus Groups follow research principles:
a methodology exists
hypothesis or objectives are established
logical process for collecting information
analysis of the results
Are Focus Groups empirical?
Focus Groups
Key planningconsiderations:
Clear Objective(s) Train the Moderator and Note taker The right participants Appropriate location Cultural considerations
These factors will determine the level of success for a given focus group.
Planning for Success
Focus Groups
The Objective • Clear and concise • Drives the planning processes
Example objective statements used by focus group researchers:
“…to evaluate strategies and elements that can be employed in Cardio Vascular Disease (CVD) intervention programs that are tailored to low socio-economic status (SES) women.”
(Gettleman, 1990)
The Objective Drives the Process
Focus Groups
Recruitment Challenges • Recruit representative sample
of the target population• Recruiting sufficient
participants to meet the sample size and power requirements of the study
• Driven by the objective statement
Recruitment Tools• Online ads• Posted ads in target
areas/locations
Recruitment and Selection of Participants
Focus Groups
Location• Comfortable atmosphere • Convenient and accessible
Environment• Comfortable • Inclusive of necessary:
• materials• lighting• temperature
CultureAffects perceptions, behaviours, communication values and opinions. This must be considered during the planning process
Location, Environment and Culture
Synergy vs. Group Effect
Synergy Whole greater than the sum of its parts
Group Effect Participants interact with each other Ability to observe non-verbal cues Ability to investigate complex behaviours and motivations
Ability to observe “consensus” and “diversity” reactions of participants
Insights occur
Homogeneous Groups
Representative Sample
• The homogeneous nature of Focus Groups contributes toward increasing the Internal Validity of the study.
Pre-existing differences in knowledge, skill, ability and attitudes are minimalized.
Therefore, the difference in data is less likely to be attributed to individual differences
Focus Group Environment
Flexible Environment Allows for participants to relax and talk openly and honestly even about sensitive issues or difficult topics
ADVANTAGES CONT’D
The Moderator: Ensures conversation is always on track
Increases interviewee participation and involvement
- through encouraging participants to engage and
- the “Hawthorne Effect”
“Hawthorne Effect” – 1950
The Moderator’s presence and the motivational impact of the interest shown toward the participants increases involvement and engagement.
Other Advantages of Focus Groups
Cost effective Focus groups are less costly and involve less time* to conduct compared to other interview methodologies.
Ability to access target groups Important especially in the field of medicine where focus groups have the advantage not to discriminate against those who cannot read or write because of their verbal nature.
Focus Groups Limitations
Generalizability of findings
o Non-representative sample (non-random sampling)
o Selected on basis on convenience (threat to external validity)
o Artificial environment
External Validity Issues
Limitations/Disadvantages
Focus Groups Limitations Cont’d
Individuals interrupting each other Fear of judgment
conformity forced compliance
Polarization of ideas
Selective listening
Groupthink
Trying to please the moderator
Disadvantages of the Group Effect
Limitations/Disadvantages
Focus Groups Limitations Cont’d
Data coding
Transcribing and analyzing data
Difficult
Time consuming
Issues with Data Analysis
Limitations/ Disadvantages
Focus Groups Limitations Cont’d
Scheduling and attendance Limited time
Number of topics Probing questions
Requires highly trained moderators Finding a neutral location Employee productivity loss Confidentiality issues
Low-trust
Logistical issues
Limitations/ Disadvantages
Focus Groups: Ethical Issues
Confidentiality When participants know each other
Stress Experienced from discussing
sensitive topics Participants receiving incorrect info from other participants
Expectations for action not realized Regret & anger
Researcher should anticipate, describe, & address consequences
Ethics
Researchers must consider:
Focus Groups
Conclusion
While there are many qualitative research methods to choose from, focus groups have proven to be a formidable asset to social sciences and must be considered a strategic tool for Human Resources professionals.
References
Buggie, F. D. (1981). Focus groups: Searching for the 'right' product. Management Review. Carey, M. A., & Smith, M. W. (1994). Capturing the group effect in focus groups: A special concern in
analysis. Qualitative Health Research. Côté‐Arsenault, D., & Morrison‐Beedy, D. (2005). Maintaining your focus in focus groups: Avoiding
common mistakes. Research in nursing & health, 28(2), 172-179. Gettleman, L., & Winkleby, M. A. (2000). Using focus groups to develop a heart disease prevention
program for ethnically diverse, low-income women. Journal of Community Health, 25(6), 439-453. Hughes, D. L., & DuMont, K. (2002). Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research. In
Ecological Research to Promote Social Change (pp. 257-289). Springer US. Ivey, J. (2011). Focus groups. 37(5), 250-251. Retrieved from http://uclhadolcancer.wikispaces.com/file/view/focus
groups Ivey.pdf . Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ: British medical journal, 311(7000),
299. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). A practical guide for applied research. A practical guide for applied
research. Langer, J. (2001). The mirrored window: focus groups from a moderator's point of view. Paramount Market Publishing. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual review of sociology, 129-152. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). Toward more rigor in focus
group research: A new framework for collecting and analyzing focus group data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1-21.
Powell, R. A., & Single, H. M. (1996). Focus groups. International journal for quality in health care, 8(5), 499-504.
Rennekamp, R. A., & Nall, M. A. (2006). Using focus groups in program development and evaluation. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension, Lexington. http://www. ca. uky. edu/AgPSD/Focus. pdf.
Wagner, M. (2009). Planning successful focus groups. Retrieved from www.promotionswest.com .