Environmental Clearance

33rd MoM held on 18th – 19thMay, 2020 Page 1 of 34

Minutes of 33rdmeeting of Expert Appraisal Committee for the proposal involving violation of EIA Notification, 2006 held on 18th - 19th May, 2020 through video conferencing Day 1: 18th May, 2020 Time: 11.00 AM to 04:30 PM

33.1. Opening remarks of the Chairman 33.2. Confirmation of the minutes of the 32ndmeeting held on 22nd- 23rd April, 2020 at Indira ParyavaranBhawan, JorBagh Road, New Delhi 33.3 Proposal for consideration 33.3.1 Proposed manufacturing unit of bulk drugs and intermediates at Plot No. E12, Chincholi

MIDC, Taluk Mohol, District Solapur (Maharashtra) by M/s Sree Kartikeya Kameshwari Industries – Further consideration for Environmental Clearance

[IA/MH/IND2/110313/2018 dated 14.10.2018] [F. No. 23-130/2018-IA.III] Details submitted by the Project Proponent

i. The Project Proponent and the Accredited Consultant M/s. Equinox Environments (I) Pvt. Ltd.

made a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and informed that:

ii. The proposal is for Environmental Clearance (EC) to the proposed project ofestablishment of Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit at Plot No. E-12,Chincholi MIDC, Tal: Mohol, Dist: Solapur, Maharashatra by Sree Kartikeya Kameshwari Industries (SKKI).

iii. Standard ToR has been issued by Ministry vide letter no. 23-130/2018-IA-III (V) dated20thJuly,

2018.

iv. All Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Industry are listed at S.N. 5 (f) ofSchedule of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification under category „B‟.But due to applicability

of General Condition i.e. the Great Indian Bustard (GIB)Sanctuary is located within 5 Km of the project area. Hence, the project is appraised atCentral Level by Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) as category A as per Ministry ofEnvironment, Forest & Climate Change Notification No. S.O. 1598 (E), dated25.06.2014.

v. Total plot area acquired by industry is 2.405 Ha.

vi. Industry will develop an area of 0.88 Ha under green belt during establishment ofproposed

project which accounts for 36 % of total plot area.

vii. The estimated cost for proposed project is Rs.5.28 Crores. Total capital costearmarked towards environmental pollution control measures is Rs. 2.3 Crores and theRecurring cost (operation and maintenance) will be about Rs. 0.45 Crores per annum.

viii. Total Employment is of 100 persons as direct as well as indirect under proposed SKKIproject.

Industry proposes to allocate Rs.0.15 Crores @ of 2.84 % of total investmenttowards Corporate Environmental Responsibility.

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-A

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text


Day 2: 19th May, 2020 Time: 12.00 PM to 5.30 PM

33.4.1 Proposed expansion of Insecticide (Insecticide Active Ingredients) production plant at

Brahmanpara, P.O. & P.S. - Haripal, District Hooghly, west Bengal by M/s Solex Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. – Terms of Reference [IA/WB/IND2/70221/2017] [F. No. J-11011/511/2017-IA-II(I) ]

Project Proponent did not attend the meeting. 33.4.2 Sponge Iron Plant (4X100 TPD), Induction furnace (2×12T +1X12T), Rolling Mill

(90,000 TPA) and 18 MW power plant [6 MW WHRB, 2 MW Coal char based and 10 MW Coal based] of M/s Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited located at Hesla, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand – Terms of Reference [F. No. J-11011/41/2013-IA.II(I)]

Details submitted by the project proponent:

1. M/s Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited (JIPL) has established 2 x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant at Village Hesla, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand after obtaining CTE from Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board (JSPCB) on 31.07.2003. Environmental clearance for installation of the Plant, as per EIA Notification 1994, was not required as the project cost was less than 100 Crores.

2. JIPL installed another 2 x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant (2x12 Ton Induction Furnace with Billet caster) after obtained CTE from JSPCB on 06.11.2006

3. JSPCB issued Consent to Operate (CTO) for operation of all installed Units till 30.09.2012. At the time of renewal of CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013, JSPCB directed the proponent to stop operation of the 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant installed during 2006 till Environmental Clearance is obtained. JSPCB granted CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013 only for operation of 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant, installed during the year 2003.

4. JIPL submitted application on 11.01.2013 for grant of TOR for obtaining EC vide letter no. JIPL/1124/12-13 on for 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant which are under violation and 1x12 Ton Induction Furnace, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill & 12 MW Power Plant under expansion.

5. Proposal was considered in 7th Reconstituted EAC Meeting of MoEF&CC on 04.04.2013 and as the proposal is for violation, MoEF&CC vide letter dated 12.06.2013 directed JIPL to submit compliance as per OM dated 12/12/2012. JIPL submitted the Board Resolution and Credible action to MoEF&CC on 04.01.2014.

6. The proposal was considered in 31st Reconstituted EAC meeting held on 08.01.2015 and again on 1st EAC Meeting held on 20.11.2015 and TOR for the project was recommended. MoEF&CC vide letter dated 08.01.2016 granted TOR.

7. FINAL EIA was submitted to MoEF&CC on 25.04.2018. Public Hearing for the project was held on 06.05.2017. EDS issued by MoEF&CC on 17.01.2019 mentioned;

VCOMGGM104

Highlight


“The proposal is involved Violation for EIA Notification, 2006. Therefore, you are requested

to make application under violation after issue of such notification for dealing of violation proposals”

The proposal is delisted the proposal from Ministry‟s website on 07.06.2019

8. JIPL requested MoEF&CC to relist the project and transfer the same to the violation committee as „Lateral Proposal Entry‟, as per MoEF&CC OM 09/09/2019.

9. The total land area of the plant is 14.38 Ha (35.54 Acres). The existing land of the plant is 25.54 Acres (10.34 Ha.). Additional 10 Acres (4.04 Ha.) is taken on 30 years lease from M/s Durga Cements Co. Ltd., Ramgarh for installation of the proposed units.

10. No national park/wildlife sanctuary/biosphere reserve/tiger reserve/elephant reserve etc. are reported to be located in the core and buffer zone of the project. The area also does not report to form corridor for Schedule-I fauna.

11. Capital cost of proposed project is Rs. 186.63 crores. Cost of the non-violating and Violating installed Units is Rs. 86.39 Cr. Hence total cost of the project is Rs. 273.02 Cr. Proposed employment generation from the project will be 174 direct employments and approx. 250 indirect employments.

12. The targeted production capacity of the plant will be as follows:

Sl.No.

Units Existing Units Units under Violation

Proposed Units Total Units after Expansion

Facility Prod. (TPA)




1. Sponge Iron

2x100 TPD DRI

Kilns

60000 2x100 TPD DRI

Kilns

60000 - - 4x100 TPD DRI

Kilns

120000

2 SMS

Induction Furnace - -

2x12T 1x12T 3X12T

Billet Caster - - 2x6/11 80000 1x 6/11 40000 3x 6/11 120000 3. Rolling Mill

- - - - 300 TPD

90000 300 TPD 90000

5. Captive Power Plant

AFBC Boiler - - - - 1 No. 12 MW 1 No. 12 MW WHRB 4 Nos. 6 MW 4 Nos. 6 MW

13. Total power requirement will be 17.6 MW. Initially power will be sourced from Grid. After commissioning of Captive Power Plant 16.2 MW power will be available from 18 MW Power Plant and balance 1.4 MW power shall be taken from the Grid.

14. The raw material requirement and fuel requirement after the project expansion are:

S.No. Item Requirement in TPA Non-

Violating Units

Violating Units

Proposed Units


1. Iron Ore 102,000 102,000 - 2. Non-Coking Coal 84,000 84,000 65,000 3. Limestone 3,000 3,000 - 4. Ferro Alloys - 1,224 612 5. Scrap - 19,957 3,978

The iron ore for the plant will be procured from West Singhbhum, Jharkhand &Barbil, Odisha and non-coking coal from CCL. The transportation of Ore & Coal will be done by rail up to Barkakhana Railway siding then by road. Fuel consumption will be mainly HSD.

15. Total water consumption for the project will be 2906 KLD (Existing: 532KLD, Proposed: 2374 KLD) and will be sourced from Damodar River. Domestic waste-water will be treated in Septic Tank with Soak Pit and Industrial waste water generated will be treated in Neutralisation Pit and reused for slag cooling and dust separation etc.

Observations and recommendations of 33rd EAC meeting held on 18th -19th May 2020 (Present meeting)

Proposal was not discussed on technical aspect by the EAC as PP has not submitted the violation details in Form 1 which is mandatory and a prerequisite to appraise the project for ToR. Further, details of the projects including kml file were circulated late to the EAC members by the PP. EAC therefore deferred the project for submission of following:

1. Revised Form 1 and PFR having details of violation. 2. Year wise production details including total cost of the project,prior to September 2006. 3. Hard copies of all the documents duly signed be submitted to the Ministry.

33.4.3 Kadadiha China Clay Mine of M/s Jagdish Mines & Metals Pvt. Ltd. For exploration of

China Clay occurring in the ML area of 367.058 Ha located at villages Kadadiha No.26, Khandabandha No. 43, Kudarbisida No.45 and Rugudi No. 44, TehasilJashipur, District Mayurbhanj, Odisha - Terms of Reference [IA/OR/MIN/73975/2018 dated 04.04.2018] [F. No.23-233/2018-IA.III (V) ]

Details submitted by the Project Proponent

1. Project description

The Proposal of M/s Jagdish Mines & Metals Pvt. Ltd is for Mining of China Clay from Kadadiha China Clay Mine of M/s Jagdish Mines & Metals Pvt. Ltd. for total Excavation of 3,02,931 Ton per annum (TPA) along with existing Beneficiation Plant. The Beneficiation plant is consisting of Washing Plant of Washed China Clay production capacity of 12,000 MT per month, Calcined China Clay Plant of monthly production capacity 2,700 MT and production of Silica Sand of Capacity 8,500 MT per month from mining lease area of 367.058 ha located at Villages Kadadiha and spread over in the villages Kadadiha No.26, Khandabandha No. 43, Kudarbisida No.45 and Rugudi No. 44, under Tehasil: Jashipur, District Mayurbhanj, State Odisha by Jagdish Mines & Metals Pvt. Ltd.

2. Project Background

The proposal of M/s Jagdish Mines & Metals Pvt. Ltd is for production of 0.302931 Million Ton per annum (MTPA) or 3,02,931 TPA of China Clay along with existing Beneficiation Plant. The Beneficiation plant is consisting of Washing Plant of Washed China Clay production capacity of 12,000 MT per month, Calcined China Clay Plant of monthly production capacity 2,700 MT and production of

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

J A KHAND I SPAT PRIV A E LIMITE ADMN. OFFICE : Near P.N. Bank, Main Road.Ramgarh Gantt. 15:2830 WORKS:

Dist Ramgarh (Jharkhand) -829 122

CIN : U34102UP1991PTC012872

Telephone : 06553-226846, Fax:226845

Viii. & P.O.- Hesla,Argada Ramgarh Cantt. -829 122 Qist. -Ramgarh (Jharkhand)

E-mail: [email protected]

Ref. No ............. . ·, '&' ~- ~-~. c,. c'.·v~'l'!t::\ '\~ Ct~G!II\e

,.,r" -:.1 . f ,"'. : r.;\lt•·"'\e Q.eC? ' u"l .. (· If ..

• .\lJ\ttt'~\ . . , ,,.... . .. ~"a<jjil~ ~A\!Ii:,H'j; , ., > 1(!~1

To • '\\1<a •1 . •• • ilt · The Director, ~ ··: · ,·., ·. { '3

Date . .. ... ...................... . JIPl/455/2020-21

Expert Appraisal Committee (Violation) ~~/ <:"' t·:· \!. · Ministry of Environment~!, Forest_ and Climate Ch~ge (MoEF&CC) --fD f. ~~ l ~/2-P Indira ParyavaranBhawan, JorBag~, New Delhi

Subject: Submission of Reply of the Observations and Recommendations made in 33111 EAC (Violat ion) meeting held on 181

h -19m May, 2020 for the proposal no. 33.4.2 "Sponge t'ron Plant (4dOOTPD), Induction Furnace (2x12T + 1x12T), Rolling Mill (90000TPA) and 18MW Captive Power Plant (6MW WHRB & 12 MW AFBC) of M/s Jharkhand lspat Pvt ltd located at village: Hesla, P.O.: Argada, District: Ramgarh, Jharkhand."

Reference: Minutes of 33niEAC (Violation) meeting held on 18"'-t9mMay, 2020 . Dear Sir,

The above mentioned project was considered in the 33rd EAC (Violation) meeting held on 181h -

19mMay, 2020 at agenda no. ~3.4.2.

We are hereby submitting the reply of the observations of the Committee made durin~ the meeting:

S.No~ Observations by EAC (Violation) Reply

1. Revised Form-1 and PFR having Violation Form-1 and PFR has been revised, giving details details of existing (non-violating), Violating

and proposed Units, separately. Attached as Annexure 1&2.

2. Year-wise production details including total Attached as Annexure -3 cost of the project, prior to September 2006.

3. Hard Copies of the all the documents duly Hard copies of all documents, duly signed signed be submitted to the ministrv.. by the project proponent are being .

submitted to the Ministry.

We request you to kindly consider our proposal in the EAC meeting.

Thanking You

Yours Sincerely

For Jharkhand lspat yvt td.

\...-- "' • ( I

DIRECTOR DIN-G0185807

Regd Office: Flat No 209, 2nd Floor, Tirupati Tower, SA 7/13-2 Aktha, Paherlya, Veranasl- 221007 (Uttar Pradesh)

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-B

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-1

Form 1 For

Expansion of Jhar~h~nd lspat (P) Ltd. for

enhancement o' Sponge Iron Production from

60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production

108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along

with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB • 6 MW

& AFBC -12 MW)

At

Village- Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Distt. - Ramgarh, Jharkhand -829122

Submitted to

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

Govt. of India

Project Consultant:

Vardan EnviroNet Plot-82A, IMT Manesar, Sector-S,

Gurugram, Haryana - 122052

Jharkhand \spat E p Ltd .

. 1(_ .-- ~ ' ..,-ector

M/s Jharkhand /spat {P) Ltd

(I) Basic Information

S. No. Item

Whether it is a violation case and

application is being submitted under

Notification No. 5.0.804 (E) dated 14.03.2017.

Form 1

Details

Yes

Annexure-1 Form1

Type of Violation a. Started the work onsite without prior EC under

1.

2.

3.

a. Started the work ansite without notification 2006. prior EC under notification 2006.

b. Expanded the production beyond the limit of EC

c. Change of product mix without obtaining prior EC

d. others

Details of Violation

Name of the Project

Brief Summary of the Project

Proposed Project Cost (In Crs.)

S.No. in the schedule

Project Sector

Proposed capacity/area/length/

tonnage to be handled/command area/ lease area/number of Wells to

be drilled.

Installed 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 2x12 Ton

Induction Furnaces after grant of NOC by JSPCB on 06.11.2006, without obtaining prior Environmental

Clearance from MoEF&CC as per EIA Notification, 2006.

Expansion of Jharkhand lspat (P) ltd. for

enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA,

Rolling Mill for production of 90,000 TPA TMT Bar

along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB - 6 MW & AFBC - 12 MW)

Attached as Annexure-/

Existing (Non-violating): Rs. 22.41 Crs.

Existing (Units under Violation): Rs. 31.71 Crs.

Proposed Units: Rs.186.63 Crs.

Total : 240.75 Crs

3(a) Metallurgical Industries (Ferrous and Non

Ferrous)

Industrial Projects-1

1. MS Billets - 36,000 TPA

2. TMT Bars - 90,000 TPA

3. Captive Power Plant -18MW

WHRB -6 MW & AFBC-12 MW

Jharkhand lspat Pv~. 'd .Page-1

~ , c < J

Olr ctor

M/s Jhorkhond /spot {P} Ltd

S.No. Item

4. Project Type (Fresh EC/

Modernization/Expansion/Expansion

under 7(ii}/Modernization under

7(ii}/Change of product mix under

7(ii}}

5. Existing Capacity/Area etc.

6. Category of Project i.e.' A' or 'B'

7. Does it attract the general

condition? If yes, please specify

8. Does it attract the specific

condition? If yes, please specify

9. Location of the project

Shape of Project Land

Upload GPS file

Uploaded copy of survey of India

Toposheet

Plot/Survey/Khasra No.

Town I Village

State of the project

No. Item

Details

Fresh EC

(?

Existing (Non-violating Units)

Annexure-1 Form1

1. DRI Units 2x100 TPD- 60,000 TPA Sponge Iron

Existing (Units under Violation)

1. DRI Units 2x100 TPD - 60,000 TPA Sponge Iron

Induction Furnace 2x12 Tons with CCM -72,000 TPA

Billets

A

No

No

Latitude: 23°38' 48.47"N & Longitude: 85°27'37.77"E

Block (Polygon)

Attached as Annexure-//

Attached as Annexure-Ill

Khata No. - 4 & 64,

Khasra I Plot No: 4, 46, 47, 48, 49, SO & 53

Village: Hesla, P.O: Argada, District: Ramgarh,

Jharkhand- 829122

Details

Details of state of the project

State Name District Tehsil

(i) Jharkhand Ramgarh Argada

10. Nearest railway station along with Argada Railway Station is at 600 meter in SE

Distance in kms. direction

Nearest airport along with distance in Birsa Munda Airport, Ranchi is at distance of 45

kms. kms

Jharkhand !spat Pvt£ Cf.98"2

~ ' ~ . --Oire tor

M/s Jharkhand /spat (P) Ltd

No. Item

11. Nearest Town, city1 District Headquarters

Along with distance in kms.

12. Village Panchayats, Zila Parishad,

Municipal Corporation, local body

(Complete postal address with telephone

nos. to be given)

13. Name of the applicant

14. Registered Address

15. Address for correspondence

i. Name of the Company

ii. Name of the Applicant

iii. Designation (Owner /Partner /CEO)

iv. Pin Code

v. E-mail

vi. Telephone No.

vii. Fax No.

viii. Copy of documents in support of the

competence/authority of the person

making this application to make

application on behalf of the User Agency

16. Details of Alternative Sites examined, if

any. location of these sites should be

shown on a toposheet.

17. Whether part of Interlinked projects?

18. Whether separate application of

Interlinked project has been submitted?

19. If Yes, MoEFCC file number

Date of submission

20. If No, Reason

Details

Annexure-1 Form1

Nearest Town is Ramgarh at 6 km distance in East

direction

Nearest City is Ranchi at 40 Km distance

Nearest District Headquarters is at Ramgarh - 6

l<.ms in distance from site.

Ramgarh (Nagar Parishad) at 6 km distance in

East direction

Postal Address: Ramgarh Nagar Parishad, Sub-

Division Office Ramgarh, Distt.

Ramgarh, Jharkhand - 829122

Ram Chandra Rungta

Near P.N.Bank, Main Road, Ramgarh Cantt, Distt

Ramgarh, Jharkhand-829122

Jharkhand lspat Pvt ltd.

Ram Chandra Rungta

Director

829122

[email protected]

06553-226846

06553 ~226845

Attached as Annexure-IV

Not Applicable as it is an expansion project

No Interlinked projects

NA

NA

NA

NA

Jharkhand lspat Pvt.f .ge-l 1\ (._ ~

, ' . Direc r


No. Item Details

Annexure-1 Farml

21. Whether the proposal involves approval I clearance under: if yes, Details of the same and

their status to be given.

I. Whether the proposal involves

approval/clearance under the Forest No

(Conservation) Act, 1980? ~

')

ii. Whether the proposal involves

approval/clearance under the wildlife No

(Protection) Act, 1972?

iii. Whether the proposal involves

approval/clearance under the C.R.Z No

notification, 2011?

22. Whether there is any Government Order/ No

Policy relevant/ relating to the site?

23. Whether any Forest Land Involved? NA

Area of Forest land Involved (hectares) No forest land is involved

24. Whether there is any litigation pending

against the project and / or land in which Yes

the project is propose to be set up?

(a) Name of the Court High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi

(b) Name of the Sub Court Principal Bench, Jharkhand . {c) Case No. W.P.(C) No. 1125/ 2014

(d) Orders/directions of the court, if Pray for quashing direction of JSPCB direction

any and relevance with the dated 10.12.2012 to stop operation of 2x100 TPD

proposed project DRI Kiln and 240 TPD Billet Caster.

The Court di rected to keep the direction in

abeyance and no coercive action be taken. Last hearing was held on 03.12.2019.

(e) Upload Court case document Attached as Annexure-V

Jharkhand lspat Pvt

'\ ' . '

Page-4

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight


(II) Activity

Annexure-1 Form1

1. Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving actions, which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes in water bodies, etc.)

S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

/No quantities /rates, wherever possible)

;, with source of Information data

1.1 Permanent or temporary change in land The existing land of the plant is 25.54

use, land cover or topography including Acres (10.34 Ha.). Additional 10 Acres

increase in intensity of land use (with No (4.04 Ha.) is taken on 30 years lease from

respect to local land use plan) M/s Durga Cements Co. Ltd., Ramgarh for installation of the proposed units. Hence there is no change in land use, land cover or topography.

1.2 Clearance of existing land, vegetation and The land is flat terrain without many

buildings? No undulations. No clearance of land,

vegetation and buildings is envisaged.

1.3 Creation of new land uses? No Already land is under industrial use. Hence, no creation of new land use.

1.4 Pre-construction investigations e.g. bore Geophysical investigation, including In-situ

houses, soil testing? Yes testing for the characterization of surface

and sub-surface soi l properties.

1.5 Construction works? Construction/erection work for the Yes proposed facilities to be taken up after

getting environmental clearance 1.6 Demolition works? No No demolition envisaged

1.7 Temporary sites used for construction No Temporary sites or Housing for

works or housing of construction workers? No construction workers are required since the workers for the construction work will be sourced from the nearby villages.

1.8 Above ground buildings, structures or Yes Earth work and above ground building,

earthworks including linear structures, cut structures are required for installation of

and fill or excavations the new facilities, building sheds for the

proposed facilities. The amount of

excavations during construction will be

used for filling the low-lying area.

1.9 Underground works including mining or No underground work except tunneling tunneling?

No for laying of cables.

1.10 Reclamation works? No Not required

1.11 Dredging? No Not Applicable

1.12 Offshore structures? No Not Applicable

Jh k Page-5 ar hand lspat Pvt;C.

"' ( ~ - I

Dire or

M/s Jharkhand /spat (P) Ltd Annexure-1

Form1



with source of Information data

1.13 Production and manufacturing processes? Production process is:

Yes

1. Production of Sponge Iron through DRI Kilns

2. Production of MS billets through Induction furnaces and billet caster

3. Production of Rolled products through

direct rolling of hot billets.

4. Power generation through WHRB

utilizing sensible heat of DRI flue gases

and through AFBC Boiler utilizing Dolo

char (by-product) and Coal.

1.14 Facilities for storage of goods or Facilities for storage of goods or materials

materials? Yes will be installed. All material and goods

will be stored under covered sheds having

RCC flooring.

1.15 Facilities for treatment or disposal of solid Slag from Induction Furnace Shall be used

waste or liquid effluents? as aggregates for area development after

metal recovery. Bag Filter dust and Mill

Scale shall be sold to the nearby

Sinter/Pellet Plants. Fly Ash shall be sold

Yes to nearby Cement Plant. Bottom Ash shall

be sold to nearby Brick Kilns to be used as

fuel in their kilns. Dolochar shall be used

in AFBC Boiler.

Cooling tower Blow-Down shall be used in

slag cooling and dust suppression.

1.16 Facilities for long term housing of local labours will be hired from nearby

1.17

1.18

1.19

operational workers? No villages during the operational stage.

New road, rail or sea traffic during No

construction or operation?

New road, rail, air waterborne or other

transport infrastructure including new or No

altered routes and stations, airports etc?

Closure or diversion of existing transport

routes or infrastructure leading to No

changes in traffic movements?

Hence no long-term housing for

operational workers is required.

Existing infrastructure will be utilized

Not Required. Existing facilities are

adequate.

Not Applicable

Page-6

Jharkhand lspat Pvt. .~. "-._ r c -

Direct r

M/s Jhorkhond /spat (P) Ltd

S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation

1.20 New or diverted transmission lines or pipelines?

1.21 Impoundment, damming, culverting,

realignment or other changes to the "

Hydrology of watercourses or aquifers?

1.22 Stream crossings?

1.23 Abstraction or transfers of water from

ground or surface waters?

1.24 Changes in water bodies or the land

surface affecting drainage or run-off?

1.25 Transport of personnel or materials for

construction, operation or

decommissioning?

1.26 Long-term dismantling or

decommissioning or restoration works?

1.27 Ongoing activity during decommissioning

which could have an impact on the

environment?

1.28 Influx of people to an area in either

temporarily or permanently?

1.29 Introduction of alien species?

1.30 Loss of native species or genetic diversity?

Yes

/No

No

~No

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

No

Annexure-1 forml

Details thereof (with approximate

quantities /rates, wherever possible)

with source of information data

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

No stream crossing

Total Water requirement of the proposed

plant and for the existing plant is 2906

KLD (For Non-Violating units: 170KLD, For

Violating units: 406KLD, For Proposed

Units: 2330KLD) and shall be met by

sourcing water from Oamodar River

Permission for drawl of 0.65 MGD from

Damodar River has been obtained from

Damodar Valley Corporation vide lr. No.

MRO/Tariff Ceii/JIPL/66 dated

04/02/2019

No change envisaged

No transportation of personnel.

Transportation of construction materials

by truck. Transportation of raw materials

for operation will be by Rail up to railway

siding at Barkakana and then by road

Not applicable

Not applicable

The additional manpower will be required

for proposed expansion which will create

influx of people from the nearby villages.

None

Not Applicable

M/s Jhorkhand /spat (P) Ltd Annexure-1

Form1




1.31 Any other actions? No No

2. Use of Natural resources for construction or .. operat ion of the Project (such as land, water, materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-renewable or in short supply):

S.No Information/checklist confirmation

Yes/ Details thereof (with approximate

No quantities /rates, wherever possible)

2.1

2.2

Land especially undeveloped or agricultural

land (ha)

Water (expected source & competing

users) unit: KLD


No agricultural land is used. The total area of the plant is 14.38 Ha. of which 10.34 Ha. of land is owned by M/s

No Jharkhand lspat Pvt. ltd. and additional 4.04 Ha. of Land which is adjacent to the plant is taken on 30 years lease with M/s Durga Cements. Hence total land use is industrial.

Total Water requirement of the proposed

plant and for the existing plant is 2906

KLD (For Non-Violating units: 170KLD, For

Violating units: 406 KLD, For Proposed

Units: 2330 KLD) and shall be met by

Yes sourcing water from Damodar River.

Permission for drawl of 0.65 MGD from

Damodar River has been obtained from

Damodar Valley Corporation vide letter

no MRO/Tariff Ceii/JIPL/66 dated

04/02/2019.

2.3 Minerals (MT) The requirement is as follows:

Yes

S.No. Item Requirement in TPA

1. Iron Ore

2. NonCoking Coal

3. Limestone

Non- Violating Proposed Violating Units Units

Units

102,000 102,000 -84,000 84,000 58,750

3,000 3,000

Page-8

Jharkhand /spat P~Ltd.

~ • L • '

D ector


Yes/

S.No Information/checklist confirmation No

2.4 Construction material -stone, aggregates,

sand I soil (expected source- MT) Yes ~

2.5 Forests and timber (source- MT) No

2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels

(source, competing users) Unit: fuel (MT),

energy (MW) Yes

2.7 Any other natural resources (use

appropriate standard units) No

Details thereof

quantities /rates,

(with

Annexure-1 Farm1

approximate

wherever possible)


The const ruction material for the proposed project will be sourced from the local market and shall be transported t o site in covered trucks.

Not envisaged

Total power requirement is 18 MW. For

Existing units (Violating & Non-Violating)

will be 10.5MW and for Proposed Units

will be 7.5MW. nil the commissioning of

CPP the power will be taken grid power.

No other natural resources are used.

3. Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or materials, which could be harmful to human health or the environment or raise concerns about actual or perceived risks to human health


S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation quantities /rates, wherever possible) with No

source of information data

3.1 Use of substances or materials, which are

hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) to human No No hazardous substance as per MSIHC health or the environment (flora, fauna, Rules shall be used

and water supplies)

3.2 Changes in occurrence of disease or affect Project will not bring any change in

disease vectors (e.g. insect or water borne No occurrence of disease or affect disease diseases) vectors.

3.3 Affect the welfare of people e.g. by Additional employment opportunities will

changing living conditions? be created by operation of the plant. This

will be benefited by direct and indirect

Yes employment which would improve the

living conditions of the people and also

through socio economic measures taken up by the proponent

3.4 Vu lnerable groups of people who could be

affected by the project e.g. hospital No Not envisaged patients, children, the elderly etc.,

3.5 Any other causes No Nil

M/s Jharkhand /spat {P} Ltd Annexure-1

Form1

4. Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or Decommissioning (MT /Month)

S.No. Yes/

Details thereof (with approximate

Information/Checklist confirmation quantities /rates, wherever possible) with No


4.1 Spoil, overburden or mine wastes No No mine or separation activity ... 4.2 Municipal waste (domestic and or No domestic or commercial municipal

commercial wastes) waste generation as no housing facility

No envisaged. Municipal waste, if any

generated will be segregated and

disposed-of as per the SW Rules, 2016.

4.3 Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous No Hazardous waste shall be generated

Waste Management Rules) No from the project, except Used Oil which

shall be sold to the registered recycler.

4.4 Other industrial Yes Type of Waste Quantity in Tons (TPA)

process wastes Existing Existing Proposed

(Non- Violating Units

Violating) Units

Sponge Iron Plant

Dolochar 15,000 15,000 ---Dedusting 11,040 11,040 -Dust

Wet Scrapper 1,800 1,800 ---Sludge

Steel Melting Shop

IF Slag -- 11,000 5,500

IF Bag Filter -- 2,200 1,100

Dust

Scale - 500 250

Rolling Mill

Mill Scale - -- 840

CPP

Fly-ash from - - 13,780

WHRB

Fly-ash from -- -- 38,000 AFBC

Bottom Ash - -- 9,500

from AFBC

Coal fines from - - 4,500

CHP

Total 27,840 41,540 73,470


S.No.

Information/Checklist confirmation

4.5 Surplus product

4.6 Sewage sludge or other sludge from '

effluent treatment

4.7 Construction or demolition wastes .

4.8 Redundant machinery or equipment

4.9 Contaminated soils or other materials

4.10 Agricultural wastes

4.11 Other solid wastes

Yes/

No

No

. .., No

Yes

No

No

No

No

Details thereof (with

Annexure-1 Farm1

approximate

quantities /rates, wherever possible) with


None

Domestic waste shall be treated in Septic

tank & Soak Pit, effluent if any will be used

for Plantation

Construction waste generated wi ll be used

for landfilling and leveling.

No Redundant machinery.

No contamination of soil or other materials

envisaged.

Not Applicable.

No other solid waste generation

5. Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air (Kg/hr)

S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/ Details thereof (with approximate

No quantities /rates, wherever possible) with


5.1 Emissions from combustion of fossil fuels Combustion of coal in DRI Kiln and AFBC Yes

Boiler from stationary or mobile sources.

Stack emissions (PM, S0 2, NOx) from DRI

5.2 Emissions from production processes Yes Kiln, Induction Furnace and AFBC boiler in

power plant.

Fugitive dust emission from storage,

Emissions from materials handling handling, transportation of raw materials.

5.3 Yes Gases emissions (S02, NOx & HC) during including storage or transport.

transportation of raw materials and

finished product.

5.4 Emissions from construction activities From construction equipment aided with

including plant and equipment. Yes fossil fuel (diesel) are Cranes, Compressor,

Mortar mixing drums etc.

5.5 Dust or odours from handling of Dust generation as mentioned above.

materials including construction Yes No odour problems. materials, sewage and waste.

Jharkhand lspat Pvt. Lt~8f11

{\ ~ (

Director '


S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation

5.6 Emissions from incinerat ion of waste

5.7 Emissions from burning of waste in open

air (e.g. slash materials, construction'

debris)

5.8 Emissions from any other sources

Yes/

No

No

-No

No


Annexure-1 Form1

approximate

quantities /rates, wherever possible) w ith


Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

6. Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat:


S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation No quantities /rates, wherever possible) with source of information data with source of information data

6.1 From operation of equipment e.g. Overall noise level shall be limited to 85

engines, venti lation plant, crushers Yes dB(A)

6.2 From industrial or similar processes Noise will be generated from Compressors,

Caster, Induction Furnace, Rolling Mills, Yes

Power Plant, etc. Suitable measures shall

be taken to control the noise at source.

6.3 From construction or demolition Noise due to operation of Cranes, Trucks, Dumpers, Construction machineries etc.

Yes The noise generated from the construction activities will be confined to the plant premises. The workers will be provided with PPEs.

6.4 From blasting or piling No

Not Applicable.

6.5 From construction or operational t raffic Yes Overall noise levels shall be limited to 85

dB (A).

6.6 From lighting or cooling systems No Not applicable

6.7 From any other sources No No other sources envisaged

Jharkhand lspat Pv~. td.

<\ . ~ ~ Dir tor

1

Page-12

M/s Jhorkhond /spot (P) Ltd Annexure-1

Form1

7. Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the ground or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea.

S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Details thereof (with approximate

Yes/ quantities /rates, wherever possible) with

No source of information data

7.1 From handling, storage, use or spillage of -·~o No Hazardous waste shall be generated

7.2

hazardous materials from the project, except Used Oil which will

From discharge of sewage or other

effluents to water or the land (expected mode and place of discharge)

be temporarily stored (for maximum 90

days) on the concrete flooring with bund

wall and oil collecting pit and shall be

suitably disposed-off through registered

recyclers, as per Hazardous and Other

Wastes (Management & Transboundary

Movement) Rules, 2016 and subsequent amendments.

No Sewage discharge shall be treated in septic

tanks with soak pits, overflow, if any, shall

be used for plantation.

Waste water from other sources shall be used in the plant for different purposes like

slag cooling, dust suppression, etc.

Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) from the plant.

7.3 By deposition of pollutants emitted to air No State of art pollution control facilities will be

7.4

7.5

into the land or into water installed. Stacks of adequate height will be

installed for proper dispersion of pollutants.

From any other sources

Is there a risk of long-term buildup of pollutants in the environment from these

sources?

No No

No Not envisaged

Jharkhand !spat PEt Ltd.

l( c , 0 rector

Page-13


Farml

8. Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which could affect human health or the environment.

S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/ Details thereof (with approximate

No quantities /rates, wherever possible) with


From explosions, spillages, fires etc from ~

No

8.1 storage, handling, use or production of Not applicable

hazardous substances

8.2 From any other causes No No

8.3 Could the project be affected by natural No No such event is known to have occurred disasters causing environmental damage in the area. Area falls under (e.g. floods, earthquakes, landslides,

Indian Standard Cloudburst etc)?

Seismic Zone-Ill as per

Seismic Zoning Map.

9. Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development) which could lead to

environmental effects or the potential for cumulative impacts with other existing or

planned activities in the locality

9.1


Lead to development of supporting

facilities, ancillary development or development stimulated by the project

which could have impact on the environment e.g.

• Supportjng infrastructure (roads,

power supply, waste or waste water

treatment etc.)

• housing development

• extractive industries

• supply industries

• other

Details thereof (with approximate Yes/

quantities /rates, wherever possible) with No


Yes The development of the project does not envisage any impact on supporting

facilities like road, power, housing,

extractive or supply industries. Supporting facilities are available as it is an operating

plant. No additional supporting facilities

proposed.

The proposed project will have a positive

effect and enhance the growth of the

region and positive impact on the

supporting infrastructure.

The industry will provide employment to

the locals and likely to improve the socio

economic status of the area. There will be

growth of supply and extractive industries.

9.2 Lead to after-use of the site, which could No No impact on environment is envisaged have an impact on the environment due to after use of the site

Page-14

Jharkhand !spat P~td.

(_ r < ' .:'r' ' Director

M/s Jhorkhond /spot (P) Ltd


9.3 Set a precedent for later developments

9.4 Have cumulative effects due to proximity to other existing or planned

projects with similar effects

(Ill) Environmental Sensitivity

S.No. Areas

1. Areas protected under international

conventions, national or local legislation

for their ecologicat landscape, cultural or

other related value

2. Areas which are important or sensitive

for ecological reasons - Wetlands,

watercourses or other water bodies,

coastal zone, biospheres, mountains,

forests

3. Areas used by protected, important or

sensitive species of flora or fauna for

breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over

wintering, migration

4. Inland, coastal, marine or underground

rvvaters

5. State, Nat ional boundaries

6. ~outes or facilities used by the public for

lac cess to recreation or other tourist,

pilgrim areas

7. Defense installations

Yes/ No

Yes

-~

No


Annexure-1 Form1

approximate

quantities /rates, wherever possible) with source of information data

The proposed project will install state of

art pollution control measures to reduce pollution and likely to set a precedent for

later development using advanced control

technologies

Not envisaged

Name/ Aerial distance {within 15 km.)

Identity Proposed project location boundary

No None

River Damodar at distance of 0.30 Yes

kms in south direction.

None No

No None

No Nil within 15 kms

No None

No None

Jharkhand lspat Pvt.~age-15

r\ . ~ . Oirec or


Farm1

Aerial distance 15 Name/ (within km.) S.No. Areas

Proposed project location boundary Identity

8. Densely populated or built·up area Yes Ramgarh is at distance of 6 kms

9. Areas occupied by sensitive man·made CCL Hospital at a distance of 3 km &

land uses (hospitals, schools, places of 11 Yes

worship, community facilities) Primary school by 1 km

10. Areas containing important, high quality

or scarce resources (ground water No None

resources, surface resources, forestry,

agriculture, fisheries, tourism, minerals)

11. Areas already subjected to pollution or

Environmental damage. No None

12. Areas susceptible to natural hazard

which could cause the project to present

environmental problems (earthquakes, None No

subsidence, landslides, erosion, flooding Area comes under Seismic Zone-Ill

or extreme or adverse climatic

conditions)

(IV} Proposed Term of Reference for EIA Studies - Copy of Proposed ToR File is attached as

Annexure- VI

(V) Declaration

l, hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and

enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief and I am aware that if any part of

the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be

rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost.

Date:

Place: District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand

Jharkhand !spat Pvtfl d.

r\ _ L _

Olre or

For Jharkhand lspat Pvt Ltd

Village: Hesla, P .0: Argada,

District: Ramgarh, Jharkhand

Page-16

Annexure-/ Expansion of Jharkhand !spat (P) Ltd, for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA RoUing Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB- 6 MW &AFBC- 12 MW) by Mfs Jharkhand !spat Private Limited

MoEF&CC F.No. - J -1 1011/4 1/20 13-IA.II(I )

Brief Summary

1.0 M/s jharkhand lspat Private Limited QIPL) has established 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant at Village Hesla, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand after obtaining CTE from Jharkhand State Pollution Control-BOard (JSPCB) on 31.07.2003. Environmental clearance for installation of the Plant, as per EIA Notification 1994, was not required as the project cost was less than .100 Crores.

2.0 JIPL installed another 2 .x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant (2x12 Ton Induction Furnace with Billet caster) after obtained CTE from JSPCB on 06.11.2006

3.0 )SPCB issued Consent to Operate (CTO) for operation of all installed Units till 30.09.2012. At the time of renewal of CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013, JSPCB directed the proponent to stop operation of the 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant installed during 2006 till Environmental Clearance is obtained. JSPCB granted CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013 only for operation of2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant, installed during the year 2003.

4.0 JIPL submitted application on 11.01.2013 for grant of TOR for obtaining EC vide letter no. JIPL/1124/12-13 on for 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant which are under violation and 1x12 Ton Induction Furnace, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill & 12 MW Power Plant under expansion.

5.0 Proposal was considered in 7th Reconstituted EAC Meeting of MoEF&CC on 04.04.2013 and as the proposal is for violation, MoEF&CC vide letter dated 12.06.2013 directed JIPL to submit compliance as per OM dated 12/12/2012. JIPL submitted the Board Resolution and Credible action to MoEF&CC on 04.01.2014.

6.0 The proposal was considered in 31st Reconstituted EAC meeting held on 08.01.2015 and again on tst EAC Meeting held on 20.11.205 and TOR for the project was recommended. MoEF&CC vide letter dated 08.01.2016 granted TOR.

7.0 FINAL EIA was submitted to MoEF&CC on 25.04.2018. Public Hearing for the project was held on 06.05.2017. EDS issued by MoEF&CC on 17.01.2019 mentioned;

"The proposal is involved Violation for EIA Notification, 2006. Therefore, you are requested to make application under violation after issue of such notification for dealing of violation proposals"

The proposal is delisted the proposal from Ministry's website on 07.06.2019

8.0 JIPL requested MoEF&CC to relist the project and transfer the same to the violation committee as 'Lateral Proposal Entry', as per MoEF&CC OM 09/09/2019.

9.0 The total land area of the plant is 14.38 Ha (35.54 Acres). The existing land of the plant is 25.54 Acres (10.34 Ha.). Additional 10 Acres ( 4.04 Ha.) is taken on 30 years lease from M/s Durga Cements Co. Ltd., Ramgarh fo r installation of the proposed units.

o/ardim tEn·vironet Jhatkhand lspat Pvt. r·

{(_ .. ~ , .,

Direct r

Page !No.1

Annexure-/ Expansion of Jharkhand !spat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB - 6 MW & AFBC- 12 MW) by M/s Jharkhand !spat Private Limited

MoEF&CC F.No.- J-11011/41/2013-IA.ll(I)

10.0 No national park/wildlife sanctuary / biosphere reserve/tiger reserve/elephant reserve etc. are reported to be located in the core and buffer zone of the project The area also does not report to form corridor for Schedule-I fauna.

11.0 Capital cost of proposed project is Rs. 1EJ6.Ei3 crores. Cost of the non-violating units is 22.41Crs and violating Units is Rs. 31.71 Cr. Hence total cost of the project is Rs. 240.75 Cr. Proposed employment generation from the project will be 174 direct employments (in addition to 220 for operation of non-violating & violating units) and approx. 250 indirect employments. ·

12.0 The targeted production capacity of the plant will be as follows:

Sl. Units Existing Units Units under Proposed Units Total Units after No. Violation Expansion

Facility Prod.

Fadlity Prod. Facility Prod. Facility Prod. (TPA) {TPA) (TPA) (TPA)

1. Sponge 2x100 60000 2x100 60000 - - 4x100 120000 Iron TPD DRI TPD DRI TPD DRI

Kilns Kilns Kilns 2 SMS

Induction 2x12T 1x12T 3X12T Furnace - -Billet Caster - - 2x6/11 72000 1x 6/11 36000 3x 6/11 108000

3. Rolling Mill 300 90000 300TPD 90000 - - - - TPD 5. CaptJve

Power Plant AFBC Boiler - - - - 1 No. 12MW 1 No. 12MW WHRB 4 Nos. 6MW 4Nos. 6MW

13.0 Total power requirement will be 18 MW. Initially power will be sourced from Grid. After commissioning of Captive Power Plant 18 MW power will be available from Power Plant.

14.0 The raw material requirement and fuel requirement after the project expansion are:

S.No. Item Requirement in TPA Non-Violating Units Violating Units Proposed Units

1. Iron Ore 102,000 102,000 -2. Non-Coking Coal 84,000 84,000 58,750

3. Limestone 3,000 3,000 -4. Scrap - 16540 8270

The iron ore for the plant will be procured from West Singhbhum, Jharkhand & Barbil, Odisha and non-coking coal from CCL. The transportation of Ore & Coal will be done by rail up to Barkakhana Railway siding then by road. Fuel consumption will be mainly HSD.

Vardim 'Eitllironet Jharkhand lspat Pvt.~ Paoe:No. 2

~ t '- • -

Oirec r

Annexure-/ Expansion of Jharkhand !spat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA. 90,000 TPA RoUing Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB- 6 MW & AFBC- 12 MW) by M/s Jharkhaud I spat Private Limited

MoEF&CC F .No.- J -11011 / 4 1/2013-IA.U(I )

15.0 Total water consumption for the project will be 2906 KLD (For Non-Violating units: 170KLD, For Violating units: 406 KLD, For Proposed Units: 2330 KLD) and will be sourced from Damodar River. Domestic waste-water will be treated in Septic Tank with Soak Pit and Industrial waste water generated wiJI be treated in Neutralisation Pit and reused for slag cooling and dust se~aration etc.

16.0 Name of Environment Consultant- M fs Vardan Environet with NABET accreditation Certificate No. NABET /EIA/1922/RA 0166 valid up to 06.11.2022.

Vardim f£1rvironet

fiPage :No. 3

Jharkhand lspat Pvt. L

~ r C ' ~ Directo

Gccglc Earth Pro

file £dit Yiew Iools ~dd t!elp

,. Se.:Jrch

G t Oarections History

"' Pl.:~ce-

" A3

" A4

" AS

" A6

" A? A8

" Untitled Placemark

• " .... JIPL_210-1201e.kml

" Untitled Placemark D E5l TemporarJ Places

• ~ JIPL_21042018.kml

'"' " ""-' JIPL 21042 lS.kml " L 1 JI PL 2 1 0-1~01 e

Primary Database B Announcements

+ +

• " f Bcrd~r> and Labels

" 0 Places - Photos

~ R.oads

• o ~ 3D Buildings Q Weather

~ Gallery ~Jkre

" Terrain

Annexure-//

GPS FILE- M/s Jharkhand lspat Pvt. ltd.

X

Jharkhand !spat Pvt.~.

~ . ~ ~ Direct ·

z . 0 r.. .. :., N

z . 0

"' !" .., N

z 6 io !" .., N

z 6 ;., !" ..,

85"24'0"E

85"24'0"E

85"27'0"E 85"30'0"E

85"2TO"E 85"30'0"E

85"33'0"E

N

W~E ~

s

z . 0 r.. ~ .., N

z . 0

"' !" .., N

z . 0

~ .., N

Jharkhand lspat P~. Ltd.

""L • -Di ctor z 6 ;.,

85"33'0"E !" ..,

TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP OF 1 OKM BUFFER AREA

Toposheet I OSM No:

73 E/6 & 73 E/10

Legend

Q Police Station ~ Settlements

1::-s-1 Streams

~ Post Office B Roads

~ School ~ Forest

1----=1 rn Waterbody Hospital

.3Q G=:J Vegetation

Temple ~ Contours -- Highway I KtKIId Locations

c::J Project Site El Railway ~Study Area

Project:

Expansion of Existing Sponge Iron Unit, Induction Furnace, Rolling Mill & Captive Power Plant VIH11f1e: Hesl•, P.O.: Arg.d•. District: R.wtgarlt, Jlulrl<hond

Project Proponent:

Mls Jharkhand lspat Pvt. Ltd.

Environment Consultant: Vardan Environet QCI-NABET Accredillted EnvlronemfHll Consultant C...mc.r. No. NABETIEIA/1419/RA.0031

Graphical Scale: 0 1,100 2,200 3,300 4,400 5,500 m

Prepared By: Approved By:

Mr. Bhagwan Sahay Mr. S.K. Sharma

JHARKHAND ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED ADMN. OFFICE : Near P.N. Bank, Main Road.Ramgarh Cantt. IS :2830

WORKS:

C/N Telephone

Dist Ramgarh (Jh?rkhand) -829 122

: U341 02UP1991 PTC012872 :06553-226846, Fax:226845

E-mail: jiplramgarh@gmail. com

OM.· 5406356

Viii, & P.O.- Hesla, Argada Ramgar~ Cantt. -829 122 Dist.-Ramgarh (Jharkhand)

Ref. No ...... ................... ...... ......... . Date ......... .. .. .... .. ... ...... .. .

JIPL I 453 I 2020-21 31.08.2020

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

. . Ram Chandra Rungta designated as Director of "Jharkhand I spat Pvt. Ltd." located at Village & PO:.Hesla, Via: Argada, District: Ramgarh, fharkhand is hereby authorized for all matters related, to Enyironmental Clearance of the proposed project. He is also authorized to all acts, deeds and things as may be required from time to time for obtaining clearance under EIA Notification, 2006 on behalf of the company. His Undertaking and decisions will be binding

on the company.

Date: 31/08/2020

Place: District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand

For Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd

~eeAJ~~~ (Rajeev Kumar Agarwal) Director DIN-00185959

. . Regd Office : Flat No 209, 2nd Floor, Tirupati Tower, SA 7/13-2 Aktha, Pahariya, Varanasi- 221007 (Uttar Pradesh)

. "

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1125 of 2014

M/s Jharkhand lspat Pvt. Ltd. Versus

The State of Jharkhand & Ors .

. ... . Petitioner

. ... Respondents

Coram:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAR!:NDRA NATH TIWARI

For the Petitioner For Respondent Nos. 2 & 3

: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate : Mr. A.K. Pandey, Advocate

Annexure-V

02/24.3.2014 In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of

letter dated 10.12.2012, particularly clause 27, whereby the

respondent nos. 3 and 4 have directed the petitioner not to operate 2

x 100 TPD DRI Ki ln & 240 TPD Billet Plant, which they have been

operating since 2005 along with their 2 x 100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant.

It has been submitted that condition has been imposed that the

petitioner cannot operate those Plants without environment clearance

and prior consent from the Board. The petit ioner has already ·applied

for environment clearance before the competent authority but till

date the same has not been issued to him. It has been further

submitted t hat sudden closure of the Plants shall cause irreparably

loss and injury to the petitioner and unemployment to hundreds of

employees.

Learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3 prays for four weeks'

time to seek instruction and file counter affidavit.

Time, as prayed for, is allowed.

Put up this case on 5th May, 2014.

In t he meantime, enforcement of clause 27 of Annexure-6,

which is against the petitioner, shall be in abeyance and no coercive

action shall be taken against the petitioner.

The petitioner also in the meanwhile shall take all steps for

getting environment clearance from the competent authority and the

prior consent of the Ministry of Environment & Forest, so that the

same may be produced before thE' respondent nos. 2 and 3, as I tPv~. td. expeditiously as possible. Jharknand spa .

""- • ' Pi ctor '

S~ r ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J)

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1125 of 2014

M/s Jharkhand lspat Pvt. Ltd. .. ... Petitioner Versus

The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .. .. Respondents

03/5.5.2014

Coram:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

For the Petitioner For Respondent Nos. ·2 & 3

: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate : Mr. A.K. Pandey, Advocate

Put up this case after Summer Vacation.

Annexure-V

Till the writ petition is taken up next, interim order dated

24.03.2014 shall continue.

~ /..-( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J)

Rakesh/

Jharkhand lspat Pvtfd. ( r £ ,

Dire tor 1

J

..... . ' .

Annexq_re-V J

--

Annexure-V

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1125 of 2014

M/s Jharkhand !spat Pvt. Ltd. -Versus

State of Jharkhand & Others

. . . Petitioner

Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

For the Petitioner For the Respondents

------ ~ Mr. Piyush Chitresh, Advocate A.C. to Mr. Jai Prakash, A.A.G.-1

04/03.12.2019. Let this matter go out of my list, to be placed before another Bench with

prior approval of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

(San jay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

A jay;

5/1412020

Case Type Filing Number Registration Number CNR Number

First Hearing Date Next Hearing Date Stage of Case Coram Bench State District Judicial Causelist Name

Case status : Search by Case Number

High Court of Jharkhand

Principal Bench Jharkhand Case Details

:WPC : 5103/2014 Filing Date: 21 -02-2014 : 1125/2014 Registration Date: 22-02-2014 : JHHC01..014883-2014

Case Status

: 05th May 2014 -· : Next Date is not given : Admission : 24854H~n'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Owivedi : Single Bench : JHARKHAND : Ramgarh : Civil Section • Daily

Petitioner and Advocate 1) MS JHARKHAND ISPAT PVT LTD THROUGH ONE OF ITS DIRECTOR SIR RAMCHANDRA RUNGTA

Annexure-V

Advocate- RAJIV RANJAN,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDIVISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI ,SHRESTH GAUTAM,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI ,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI,SHRESTH GAUTAM,SHRESTH GAUTAM,SHRESTH GAUTAM, VIS HAL KUMAR TRIVEDI

Respondent and Advocate 1) STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ORS

Advocate- A.A. G. -1 , ,AJAY KR PANDEY,MD MOKHTAR KHAN,MD MOKHTAR KHAN,AJAY KR PANDEY,MD MOKHTAR KHAN,MD MOKHTAR KHAN,AJAY KR PANDEY,AJAY KR PANDEY 2) The Jharkhand State Pollytion Control Board Ranchi

3) The Member Secretary Jharkhand Stat Pollution Cont

4) The Union Of India Through Its Secretary

History of Case Hearing

Cause List Type Judge Business On Date Hearing Date Purpose of hearing

Hon'ble Mr Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari 05-05-2014 Fresh Filing

Hon'ble Mr Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari ~dmission

Daily Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi ~dmission

Orders

Order I Judge Order Date Order Details Number

1 I 1 24-03-2014

2 Not Available 05-05-2014

3 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Owivedi 03-12-2019

Category Details

Category CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION-11300 ( 113)

Sub Category Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-11301 ( 1) Sub Sub Category Quashing Matter ( 25 )

OBJECTION

Jharkhand I spat..,~ ,( 4 L .

,

Sr.No. !Scrutiny Date jOBJECTION jCompliance Date {Rectfi)i~fpr 1 122-02-2014 1) Other Defects ... .. - 01-03-2014

https://services.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaH C/cases/case_no .php ?state_ cd= 7 &dist_ cd=1 &court_ code=1 &stateNm=Jharkhand# 1/2

Annexure-VI

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EINEMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ ACTNITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

3(a):STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTING ENVIRONMENT IIvlPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR METALLURGICAL INDUSTRIES (FERROUS & NON FERROUS) PROJECTS AND INFORMATION :'0 BE INCLUDED IN EIA/EMP REPORT '- ~

A STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR)

1) Executive Summary

2) Introduction

i. Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET accreditation

ii. Information about the project proponent

iii. Importance and benefits of the project

3) Project Description

i. Cost of project and time of completion.

H. Products with capacities for the proposed project.

iii If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and whether adequate Jand is available for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any.

iv. List of raw materials required and their source along with mode of transportation.

v. Other chemicals and materials required with quanUties and storage capacities

vi. Details of Emission, effluents. hazardous waste generation and their management.

vii. Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram, man-power requirement (regular and contract)

viii. Process description along with major equipments and machineries, process flow sheet (quantative) from raw material to products to be provided

ix. Hazard identification and details of proposed safety systems.

x. Expansion/modernization proposals:

a. Copy of all the Environmental Clearance(s) including Amendments thereto obtained for the project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure. A certified copy of the

latest Monitoring Report of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests as per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions stipulated

in all the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be provided. In addition, status of compliance of Consent to Operate for the ongoing !existing operation of the project from SPCB shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report.

~ Jharkhand lspat Pv~t. td. --------~----------------~~r----------~~~-------+-~

~( , ~ - J

Oir tor ._ ___ _

Annex ure-VI

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIAIEMPREPORT FOR PROJECTS/ ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANC8

b. In case the existing project has nor obtained environmental clearance, reasons for not taking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and/or ElA Notification 2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to Establish/No Objection Certificate and Consent to Operate (in case ofunits operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE and CTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from _the~SPCB shall be submitted. Further. compliance report to the conditions of consents from the SPCB shall be submitted.

4) Site Details

i . Location of the project site covering village, Taluka!fehsil, District and State, Justification for selecting the site. whether other sites were considered.

ii. A toposheet ofthe study area of radius of lOkm and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/ A2 sheet. (including all eco-sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places)

iii. Details w.r.t. option analysis for selection of site

iv. Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site.

v. Google map-Earth downloaded of the project site.

vi. Layout maps indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an Industrial area/Estate/Complex, layout of fudustrial Area indicating location of unit within the Industrial area/Estate.

vii. Photographs of the proposed and existing (if applicable) plant site. If existing, show photo~raphs of plantation/greenbelt, in particular.

viii. Landuse break-up of total land of the project site (identified and acquired) , govenunent/ private - agricultural. forest, wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc shall be included. (not required for industrial area)

ix. A list of major industries with name and type within study area (lOkm radius) shall be incorporated. Land use details of the study area

x. Geological features and Ceo-hydrological status of the study area shall be included.

xi. Details of Drainage of the project upto 5km radius of study area. If the site is within 1 km radius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of the project site and maximwn Flood Level of the river shall also be provided. (mega green field projects)

xii. Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition process and expected time of complete possession of the land.

xiii. R&R details in respect of land in line with state Government policy

5) Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable):

i. Permission and approval for the use of forest land (forestry clearance) , if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Department. {if appUcable)

ii. Land use map based on High resolution satellite imagery ( G PS) of the proposed site delineating the forestland (in case of projects involving forest land more than 40 ha)

Jharkhand lspat Pvt

~ ' t. -

Annexure-VI

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR ElAffiMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS! ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVlRONMENT CLEARANCE

iii. Status of AppHcation submitted for obtaining the stage I forestry clearance along with latest

status shall be submitted.

iv. The projects to be located within I 0. km of theN ational Parks. Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, th~ project proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden sho'.~ing these features vis-a-vis the project location and the recommendations or comments of the ChiefWildUfe Warden-thereon

v. Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the State

Government for conse!"ation of Schedule I fauna, if any exists in the study area

vi. Copy of application submitted for clearance under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to the Standing Committee of the National Board for WildLife

6) Environmental Status

i. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and site-specific micrometeorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall.

ii. AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PMlO, PM2.5, S02, NOX, CO and other parameters relevant to the project shall be coJiected. The monitoring stations shall be based CPCB guidelines and take into account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone

and sensitive receptors including reserved forests .

iii. Raw d!lta of allAAQmeasurement for 12 weeks of aU stations as per frequency given in the NAQQM Notification of Nov. 2009 along with- min., max., average and 98% values for each oft he AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be provided as an annexure to the EIA Report.

iv. Surface water quality of nearby River (lOOm upstream and downstream of discharge point) and other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/MoEF&CC guidelines.

v. Whether the site fa.lls near to polluted stretch of river identified by the CPCB/MoEF&CC, if

yes give details.

vi.

vii.

viii.

ix.

x.

xi.

Ground water monitoring at minimum at 8 locations shall be included.

Noise levels monitoring at 8 locations within the study area.

Soil Characteristic as per CPCB guidelines.

Traffic study of the area, type of vehicles, frequency of vehicles for transportation of materials,

additional traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement etc.

Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study area shall be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species. If Schedule

! fauna are found within the study area. a Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be prepared and

furnished. Jharkhand lspat Pvt.~· Socio-economic status of the study area. • (

""-_ ., L .

Dire or

-------------------------------4~~-------------------------------

Annexure-VI

S1'ANDARD TERMS OF PE~ ERENCE {TOR) FOREIA/EMPREPORT FOR PROJECTS/ ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENV'ffiO 'MEN 1 CLEARANCE

7) Impact and Environment Management Plan

i. Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological features. In case the project is located on a hilly terrain, the

AQIP ModeJling shall be done using meuts of the specific terrain characteristics for determining the potential impacts of the pr6je(lt on the AAQ. Cumulative impact of all sources of emissions (including transportation) on the AAQ of the area shall be assessed. Details of

the model used and the input' data used for modelling shall also be provided. The air quality contours shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any.

ii. Water Quality modelling - in case of discharge in water body

iii. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment shall be assessed and provided. 1n this regard, options for transport of raw materials and finished products and wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road transport or conveyorcum-rail transport shall be examined.

iv. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plant operations, extent recycled and reused for different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme of effluent treatment. Characteristics

of untreated and treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E(P) Rules.

v. Detail~ of stack emission and action plan for control of emissions to meet standards.

vi. Measures for fugitive emission control

vii. Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage, utilization and management. Copies of MOU regarding utilization of solid and hazardous waste in cement plant shall aJso be included. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.

viii. Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash Notification, 2009. A detailed plan of action shall be provided.

ix. Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than

I ,500 trees per ha. Giving details of species. width of plantation, planning schedule etc. shall be included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening

of the roads used for the project shall also be incorporated.

x. Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall be submitted to harvest

rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources.

xi. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures shall be included.

xii. Action plan for post-project environmental monitoring shall be submitted.

-

8)

Annexure-VI

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR illA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJEC'ISIACnVTilES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

xiii. Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency

Management Plan including Risk Assessment and damage control. Disaster management

plan should be linked with District Disaster Management Plan.

Occupa tiona l health -· -· !)

i. Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and casual

workers

ii. Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the workers' health is being

evaluated by pre designed fonnat, chest x rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far

& Near vision, colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and

periodkal examinations give the details of the same. DetaiJs regarding last month analyzed

data of above mentioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department

wise.

Ui Details of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of hazards

and whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,

what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of the workers

can be preserved,

iv. Annual report of heath status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health and

Safety.

9) Corporate Env ironment Policy

i. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of

Directors? If so. it may be detailed in the EIA report.

li. Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process I procedures to bring

into focus any infringement I deviation I violation of the environmental or forest norms I conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

iii. What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the

environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearance

conditions? Details of this system may be given.

iv. Does the company have system of reporting of non compliances I violations of environmental

norms to the Board of Directors of the company and I or shareholders or stakeholders at

large? This reporting mechanism shalJ be detailed in the EIA report

1 0) Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel , restroom etc. to be provided to the

labour force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers during

operation phase.

11) Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC)

i. Adequate funds (at least 2.5 % of the project cost) shall be earmarked towards the Enterprise

SociaJ Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise details aJong with time

--------------------------~~~----------~J~h-ar~~--an-d~ls-p-at~P~v~i~.~d .

"' ' L- J I Dire or

Annexure-VI

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIAlEivfP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIROI\'MENT CLEARANCE

bound action plan shall be included. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.

12) Any litigation pending against the proj ect and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of Law

against the project. if so, details thereof sha iJ alsp be included. Has the unit received any notice >I

under the Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and Water Acts? If so, details thereof and compliance/ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case.

13) A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TOR.

B. SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EIA STUDIES FOR METALLURGICAL INDUSTRIES (FERROUS & NON FERROUS)

1) Complete process flow diagram describing each unit, its processes and operations. along with material and energy inputs & outputs (material and energy balance).

2) Details on blast furnace/ open hearth furnace/ basic oxygen furnace/ladle refining. casting and rolling plants etc.

3) Details on installation/activation of opacity meters with recording with proper calibration system

4) Details on toxic metals including mercury, arsenic and fluoride emissions

5) Details on stack height requirement for integrated steel

6) Details on ash disposal and management -Non-ferrous metal

7) Complete process flow diagram describing production of lead/zindcopper/ aluminium, etc.

8) Raw materials substitution or elimination

9) Details on smelting, thermal refming. melting. slag fuming. and Waelz kiln operation

1 O) Details on Holding and de-gassing of molten metal from primary and secondary aluminum, materials pre-treatment, and from melting and smelting of secondary aluminium

11) Details on solvent recycJjng

12) Details on precious metals recovery

13) Details on composition, generation and utilization of waste/fuel gases from coke oven plant and their utilization.

14) Details on toxic metal content in the waste material and its composition and end use (particularly of s lag).

15) Trace metals Mercury. arsenic and fluoride emissions in the raw material.

16) Trace metals in waste material especially s lag.

17) Plan for trace metal recovery

18) Trace metals in water

Jharkhand lsp: 1-'Vl. .'-J· {( ' Oir~ '

--------------------------~~~---------------------------

Annexure-2

Pre-Feasibility Report of

JHARKHAND ISPAT (P) LTD.

for

Expansion of Jharkhand lspat (P) Ltd. for

enhancement of Sponge Iron Production

from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet

Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling

Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant

(WHRB- 6 MW & AFBC- 12 MW)

at

Village- Hesla, P .0. - Argada, Distt. - Ramgarh,

Jharkhand - 829122

Prepared By:

Environment Consultant 0""' '

Vardan Environet (QCI and NABET/EIA/1619/SA 077)

82-A, IMT, SECTOR-S, MANESAR, HARYANA

MaiiiD: [email protected]

fLtd

.Jbttkpand \ap

"' · L- 1 rect

Contact N.o. 0124-4291036, 09899651342

Annexure-2

]harkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Pre-Feasibility Report

Chapter

1.

2.

3.

4

CONTENTS

Description Page no .

... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .. ., 4

INTRODUCTION OF PROJECT & BACKGROUND INFORMATION

2.1 Identification of Project & Project Proponent 8

2.2 Project ·Proponent 9

2.3 Need for the project and importance to the region 9

2.4 Imported Vs. Indigenous Production 10

2.5 Demand Supply Gap 10

2.6 Domest ic I Export Market 10

2.7 Employment Generation due to the Project 10

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

3.1 Type of Project including Interlinked and Independent 12 Project

3.2 location

3.3 Details of Alternative Site Considerations

3.4 Size and Magnitude of Operations

3.5 Project Description with Process Details

3.6 Process Details

3.7 Raw Materials Requirement

3.8 Resource Optimization

3.9 Solid Waste Generation & M anagement

3.10 Plant Layout

SITE ANALYSIS

4.1 Connectivity

4.2 Land Form, Land Use and Land Ownership

4.3 Topography of the Land

4.4 Existing & Proposed Land Use Pattern

4.5 Existing Infrastructure

12

12

13

13

14

23

24

25

27

28

28

28

29

29

Page No.2

Jharkhand lspat Pvt

v(, , t ~

Annexure-2

[harkhand lspat Pvt. Ltd. Pre-Feasibility Report

Chapter Description Page no.

4.6 Soil Classification 29

4.7 Climate - 29 :f. ,

5 PLANNING BRIEF

5.1 Planning Concept 30

5.2 Population Projection 30

5.3 Land Use Planning 30

5.4 Assessment of Infrastructure Demand 31

5.5 Amenities I Facilities 31

6 PROPOSEDINFRASTRUTURE

6.1 Industrial Area (Processing Area) 32

6.2 Residential Area (Non-processing Area) 32

6.3 Greenbelt 32

6.4 Connectivity 32

(j.5 Drinking Water Management 32

6.6 Sewage System 32

6.7 Industrial Waste management 33

6.8 Power Requirement & Supply I Source 33

7. REHABILITATION & RESffiLEMENT (R&R) PLAN 35

8. PROJECT SCHEDULE & COST ESTIMATE

8.1 Project Schedule 36

8.2 Cost Estimate 36

9. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL 38

Page No.3

[harkhand I spat Pvt. Ltd.

Annexure-2

Pre-Feasibility Report

1.0 PREFACE

CHAPTER 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

M/s Jharkhand lspat Pvt. Lt~. (JIPL) is a registered company under the Company's Act,

established at village - Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand in the year 2003

for production of sponge iron.

JIPL had installed 2xlOOTPD (Sponge Iron Plant) DRI Units in the year 2003 for production

of 60,000 TPA Sponge Iron after obtaining Consent to Establish from Jharkhand State

Pollution Control Board vide letter No. N-8 dated 31.07.2003.

In the year 2006, another 2x100TPD DRI Kilns for production of 60,000 TPA sponge Iron and

2xl2T Induction furnaces along with Continuous Casting Mill for 80,000 TPA Billet

production were installed after getting NOC from Jharkhand Pollution Control Board

(JSPCB) on 6th November, 2006 vide letter no. 3558 and subsequently obtained Consent to

Operate from the JSPCB till 24.12.2011. As these Units were installed without obtaining

prior environmental clearance under EIA Notification, 2006, hence installation of 2x100

TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 2x12 Ton Induction Furnaces comes under Violation of the EIA

Notification,2006.

j\PL management has realized that for its business to survive, the Company should stop

selling billets and should produce TMT Reinforcement Bars as value added product and also

take measures to reduce cost of production. Accordingly, JIPL has now proposed to install

downstream facilities; a 12T induction furnace, a 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill and 18MW Power

Plant to utilize sensible waste heat energy from the DRI flue gases and dolochar produced

in these Kilns, supplemented by coal.

The present proposal is to obtain Environmental clearance for the Units under Violation as

well for the proposed units.

2.0 THE PROJECT PROPONENT

Mr. Ram Chandra Rungta and Mr. Rajeev Kumar Agarwal are presently the Directors of

Jharkhand lspat Private Umited.

Sri Ram Chandra Rungta, a renowned industrialist from Jharkhand, hails from the reputed

Rungta family having diversified business exposure in mining, excavation, real estate,

transportation, highway & civil projects, steel industry, cement industry, irrigation system

etc. The group owned Iron and Steel Industries are the key Companies under the name

rendering t he group an identity, presence and unparalleled success in t he short span of

time. Jharkhand lspat Pv~- d .

(( r t 'f

Olre tor

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Page4

[harkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd.

3.0 lOCATION & LAND

Annexure-2


The project will be located at Khata No.-4 & 64, Khasra/Piot No.4, 46, 47, 48, 49, SO & 53

in village: Hesla, P.O.-Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand State. The total area of the

project will be 14.38 Ha. (35.54 Acres) out of which 25.54 Acres is already under possession

of M/s Jharkhand lspat Pvt. Ltd. and adjacent 1P Acres of land is taken on lease for 10 years II

from M/s Durga Cement Company Limited.

4.0 MANPOWER

Manpower requirement fo,r existing Non-Violating and violating units are 120 and 100

respectively. Additional manpower required for the proposed units will be 174. Total

manpower after the proposed expansion shall be 394 comprising Technical Managerial &

Supervisory Staff.

5.0 POUUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT

Following pollution control measures will be taken up for steel project of M/s Jharkhand

tspat Pvt. Ltd.:

• Dust Settling Chamber {DSC) with After Burning Chamber (ABC) and ESP (4 nos.), one

each with 4 DRI Kiln, connected with 2 nos. of stacks (Existing)

• 8 Nos. of Bag Filters at Material handling areas, Intermediate Bin, Cooler Discharge

areas & Product house (Existing).

• Installed silo system of 100 m3 capacities for ash/ dust handling within closed circuit for

handling of dust from ESP & Bag filters outlet to silo (Existing).

• 80 nos. of water sprinklers (Existing).

• ESP (1 no.) with separate stack at AFBC Boiler (Proposed)

• Bag Filter (1 no.) with stack in Coal Handling area of Power plant (Proposed)

• Venturi scrubber (1 no.) with 2x12 Ton Induction Furnace connected with a stack

(existing)

• Venturi scrubber (1 no.), one with proposed Induction Furnaces of 12 Tons, connected

with single stack.

• Dust suppression in Raw material handling areas. This will result in reduction in fugitive

dust emission.

• Settling Pond with Venturi Scrubber with Induction Furnace (Existing & Proposed)

• Neutralization Pit at Power Plant for OM Plant waste water (Proposed).

• ETP for Rolling Milling effluent (Proposed)

Water shall be mainly used for cooling water and shall be recycled after cooling in Cooling

Towers. Softening Plant back wash water, OM Plant waste water and Cooling Tower Blow

down water shall be used for slag cooling and dust suppression. Zero effluent discharge

(ZLD) shall be maintained.

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand lspal Pvt L~age s

vl ~ I{

Of recto

]harkhand I spat Pvt. Ltd.

Annexure-2


6.0 PROJECT COST AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE

Cost of the existing non-violating facilities is Rs. 22.41 Crores which includes 2.45 Crs. for

pollution control facilities. Cost for units installed in the year 2006 and under violation is Rs.

31.71 Crores and cost of the proposed unit is Rs. 186.63 crores.

After getting CTE from JSPCB and EC from MQEF~CC, tenders will be floated for purchase,

installation and commissioning of equipment and earth work will start parallel. Estimated

completion schedule of project is 24 months.

7.0 SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT '

S.No. Particulars Details

1. The Project Expansion of Jharkhand I spat {P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB - 6 MW & AFBC - 12 MW)

2. Location of the Project Village: Hesla, P.O, Argada, Ramgarn District, Jharkhand

3. Topo-sheet Nos. 73 E/6,73 E 10

4. AMSL 335 m above MSL

5. Latitude 23°38' 48.47" N

6. Longitude 85°27'37.77" E

7. Area of the Plant Existing Land Proposed Land Total Land

10.34 Ha. 4.04 Ha. 14.38 Ha.

(25.54 acre) (10 acre) (35.54 acre)

8. Biosphere Reserve I National Nil Park I Wildlife Sanctuary I Ecological sensitive area

9. Reserve Forest I Protected No Reserve forest present in 10 Km radius of plant Forest area. Few protected forests present in 10 km

radius

10. Existing Units and capacities Existing (No-violating Units)

1. DRI Units 2x100 TPD- 60,000 TPA Sponge Iron

Existing (Units under Violation)

1. DRI Units 2x100 TPD - 60,000 TPA Sponge Iron 2. Induction Furnace 2x12 Tons with CCM-

72,000 TPA Billets

11. Proposed Expansion 1. Induction Furnace lx12 Tons along with Billet Caster - 36,000 TPA Billets

2. Installation of 300 TPD Rolling Mill - 90,000 TPA

M/s Vardon Environet~ Gurugram Jhark.hand !spat Pvt. Lt~

~ . -~ -Cfrector

Page6

[harkhand !spat Pvt. Ltd.

S.No. Particulars

12. Cost of the proposed expansion

13. Manpower Requirement

14. Requirement of Water

15. Requirement of Power I Fuel

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram

Annexure-2


Details

TMT Bars 3. CPP -18 MW (Total)

-WHRB-6MW

-AFBC-12 MW

Existing (Non-violating): Rs. 22.41 Crs.

Existing (Units under Violation): Rs. 31.71 Crs.

Proposed Units: Rs.186.63 Crs.

Total : 240.75 Crs.

Existing (Non-violating): 120 nos.

Exiting (Violating): 100 nos.

Proposed: 174

Total : 394

Existing (Non-violating): 170 KLD

Existing (Violating): 406 KLD

Proposed: 2330 KLD

Total after Expansion: 2906 KLD

Power Requirement

Existing (Non-Violating & Violating): 10.5 MW (DRI

1.6 MW & Induction Furnace 8.9 MW)

Total after expansion: 18.00 MW

DGSet

Existing: 2xSOOKVA, 1 x320KVA & 1x7SOKVA

Proposed:lxSOOKVA

Fuel: HSD: 1000 liters I day (For Emergency and

Start up only)

Jharkhand \spat P~v. td.

rv\ , L ) • Olr ctor

Page7

SN

1

2

3

4

5


CHAPTER- 2

Annexure-2


INTRODUCTION OF PROJECT AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION

2.1 IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT AND PROJECT PROPONENT

The Project ....

M/s Jharkhand lspat (P) Ltd. is a private limited company incorporated on 29.04.2003 for

production of 60,000 TPA Sponge Iron through 2><100 TPD Coal Based DRI Kilns at village

Hesla, P.O.- Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand after obtaining 'Consent to Establish'

(CTE) form Jharkhand State pollution Control Board vide lr.N-8 dated 31.07.2003.

Another 2x100TPD DRI Kilns for production of 60,000 TPA sponge Iron and 2x12T Induction

furnaces along with Continuous Casting Mill for production of 72,000 TPA Billet were

installed after getting NOC from Jharkhand Pollut ion Cont rol Board (JSPCB) on 6th

November, 2006 vide letter no. 3558, without obtaining Environment Clearance under EIA

Notification-2006 and comes under violation.

JIPL also proposed to install1x12Ton Induction Furnace with CCM, 300 TPD Rolling Mill and

18 MW Captive Power Plant.

Details of Existing (Violating & Non-Violating Units) and proposed facilities vis-a-vis

production capacities is given below:

Existing Installed Units Final Configuration

Non-Violating Violating Units Proposed Units

(Seeking EC for) Project

Details Prod. Prod. Prod. Prod. Unit

(TPA) Unit

(TPA) Unit

(TPA} Unit

(TPA)

Sponge Iron 2X100 2Xl00 4xlOO 60,000 60,000 - - 120,000

Plant TPD TPD TPD

Induction -

Furnaces 2X12T 1X12T 3X12T

2strand 1strand 3strand Billet caster

6/llm 72,000

6/llm 36,000

6/11m 108,000

Rolling mill - - 300 TPD 90,000 300 TPD 90,000

Captive

Power Plant - -

AFBC Boiler 1 12 MW 1 12 MW

WHRB 4 6MW 4 6MW

The project is listed as activity 3 (a) 'Metallurgical Industries (Ferrous & Non-ferrous)' under

Schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and falls under category 'A'. The project shall be

appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Violation) at Ministry of Environment, Forest

M/s Vardan Environet, Gurugram Jharkha7d I spat Pvt. ~t • Page 8

~\ ~ £ r '

Direct


Annexure-2


& Climate Change for prescribing TOR for undertaking detailed EtA Study for violation and

the expansion project.

2.2 PROJECT PROPONENT

Presently the Directors of Jharkhand tspat Private Limited are:

a) Mr. Ram Chandra Rungta

b) Mr. Rajeev Kumar Agarwal

A member of Rungta group of companies with their works located in Ramgarh District in

Jharkhand State. The objective of the Company is to produce Sponge Iron coal and semi-

finished and finished steel products.

Sri Ram Chandra Rungta, a renowned industrialist from Jharkhand, hails from the reputed

Rungta family having diversified business exposure in mining, excavation, real estate,

transportation, highway & civil projects, steel industry, cement industry, irrigation system

etc. The group owned Iron and Steel Industries, are the key Companies under the name

rendering the group an identity, presence and unparalleled success in the short span of

time.

The Group owns the following Iron & Steel Plants - all located in Ramgarh District in the

State of Jharkhand:

1. Jharkhan~ lspat Private Limited was formed on 29.04.2003 situated at Hesla, P.O,

Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand State.

2. Aloke Steels Industries Private Limited was formed on 06.05.2004 and it is situated at

Village: Budhakhap, Karma, Ramgarh Cantt, Jharkhand.

3. Maa Chhinnmastlka Cement & tspat Private limited was formed on 02.06.2004 and is

situated at Village: Hehal, Barkakana, Ramgarh Cantt, Jharkhand.

2.3 NEED FOR THE PROJECT AND IMPORTANCE TO THE REGION

Steel is crucial to the development of any modern economy and is considered to be the

backbone of the human civilization. The level of per capita consumption of steel is treated

as one of the important indicators of socio-economic development and living standard of

the people in any country. All major industrial economies are characterized by the existence

of a strong steel industry and the growth of many of these economies has been largely

shaped by the strength of their steel industries in their initial stages of development.

The Crude steel production in India has grown from a mere 1.5 million tons in 1951 to

106.56 million tons in 2018-19. During the first two decades of planned economic

development, i.e. 1950-60 and 1960-70, the average annual growth rate of steel production

exceeded 8%. According to Ministry of Steel reports, the total production of Crude Steel in

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand I spat Pvt. ?rt ~ \ ~ L

Cfrect

Page9

,

Jharkhand lspat Pvt. Ltd.

Annexure-2


India has been 106.56 million tons in 2018-19 as compared to 57.8 million tons in 2007-08

indicating an increase of 91% in the last 10 years (i.e. annual growth rate of above 9%).

2.4 IMPORT Vs INDIGENOUS PRODUCTION

Global Crude steel production has recorded an annual growth of 3.46% during last 10 years

(2008 to 2018). Annual growth rate of crude .st~l production was above 8.5% in India, in

last 10 years in compare to 3.46% world growth rate and this will continue.

2.5 DEMAND-SUPPLY GAP

The per capita steel consum,:>tion in India continues to remain at a level 68 kg in comparison

to World average of about 208 Kg and 350 kg in developed countries. Though, India Is 2nd

largest producer of steel in the World, India's contribution is only 17% of the world steel

production. Hence long term and short-term strategies are necessary in planning the

development of the st eel industry in the country to improve the level of per capita steel

consumption. Private sector is playing an important role in supplementing the requirement

of steel in the country. Their contribution in finished steel production has increased to

58.9% in 2017-18 as compared to 45% in 1992-93.

In order to meet the increasing steel demand, new steel plants shall be established. It has

been observed that a combination of small, medium and large capacity steel plants can

contribute in big way in achieving the national interest of self-reliance.

Considering the demand for steel in these sectors M/s Jharkhand lspat Pvt ltd has planned

to expand the production capacity of its existing plant.

The State can be benefited from the project as there will be direct employment of large

people in the Steel plant. Preference will be giveri to the people of the state possessing

requisite skill and qualification criteria. Also, there will be lot of scope for indirect

employment of the people of the state in and around the project site.

2.6 DOMESTIC / EXPORT MARKET

Instead of selling Billets to Rolling Mills of other Units1 it is now proposed to set-up its own

Rolling Mill to produce Thermo-Mechanically Treated (TMT) High Strength Steel

Reinforcement Bars in a most energy efficient and cost-effective manner. These Rebars are

always in high demand in the construction sector. The finished product will be sold in the

Steel Markets of Major states in India especially Bengal, Jharkhand, Bihar, Sikkim, Uttar

Pradesh and North Eastern States. The products will be produced indigenously and will be

consumed in the country and also outside the country as per the demand.

2.7 EMPLOYMENT GENERATION (DIRECT AND INDIRECT} DUE TO THE PROJECT

Existing manpower of the plant is 220 (including manpower for operation of violating

Units).The estimated additional direct manpower required after the proposed expansion

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand !spat Pvt ft . Page

10

J ~ ~ ' ~-Direct r


Annexure-2


shall be 174, comprising administrative, technical, non-technical, skilled and unskilled

workforce. Approx. SO persons will be employed during construction phase.

The total requirement of manpower in the plant will be avaflable without much difficulty as

the area has industrial exposure in Iron & steel sector. However, specialized training for

operation and maintenance will have to be gi~en to selected candidates well in advance

before commissioning of the plant. / ~

In addition to this there shall be indirect requirement of manpower in transportation sector

for transportation of raw material. Development of nearby industries also envisaged for

supply of additional requirement of Pig Iron I Scrap.

M/s Vardon Environet,. Gurugram Pagell

Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd.

CHAPTER 3

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Annexure-2


3.1 TYPE OF THE PROJECT INCLUDING INTERLINKED AND INTERDEPENDENT PROJECTS, IF ANY

The project is Industrial project listed under activity 3(a) Metallurgical Industries (Ferrous &

Non-ferrous) as per EIA Notification, 2006 and falls under Category 'A'.

Project is standalone project for creating additional Steel Making and Rolling facility at one

location without dependence on other 'j:m~jects. There is no interlinked project or

interdependent project.

3.2 LOCATION

The project is an expansion of existing works at Village - Hesla, P.O, Argada, Ramgarh

District, Jharkhand State and will be located in the same location where the existing plant is

and for which the area is available. The total land required for the project is 35.54 Acres

(14.38 Ha.). The existing land of the plant is 25.54 Acres (10.34 Ha.). Additional 10 Acres

(4.04 Ha.) is taken on 30 years lease with M/s Durga Cements Co. Ltd., Ramgarh.

. ' '

. ......

·-

Village: Hesla District: Ramgarh latitude: 22° 38' 48.47" N longitude: 85°27'37. 77"E

Fig: Location Map for the Project

3.3 DETAILS OF ALTERNATE SITE CONSIDERED

Alternate site has not been examined as the project is for expansion of the existing plant

within the existing plant area.

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Page12 Jharkhand lspat Pvt. ~t .

~ r- ( ~ ' "'

Of recto

SN

1

2

3

4

5


3.4 SIZE OR MAGNITUDE OF OPERATION

Annexure-2

Pre-Feasibilittt Report

The project is expansion of existing plant. The project size is as follows:

Table 3.1: Existing and Proposed Plant Configuration and Capacities

Existing Installed Units '

Vlolatlng Units Proposed Units Final Configuration

Project Non-Violating (Seeking EC for)

Details Prod. Prod. Prod. Prod.

Unit (TPA)

Unit (TPA)

Unit (TPA)

Unit (TPA)

Sponge Iron 2X100 2X100 4x100 60,000 60,000 - - 120,000

Plant TPD TPD TPD

Induction - 2X12T 1x12T 3X12T Furnaces

Billet Caster 2strand

6/llm 72,000

1strand

6/11m 36,000

3strand

6/llm 108,000

Rolling mill - - 300TPD 90,000 300TPD 90,000

Captive

Power Plant - -

AFBC Boiler 1 12MW 1 12MW

WHRB 4 6MW 4 6MW

Products:

Product Existing (including Violating Units (TPA) After proposed expansion (TPA)

Sponge Iron 120,000

MS Billets 72,000

Rolled Product -(TMT Bar)

Power -

3.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION WITH PROCESS DETAILS

Plant Technical Feature

-

108,000

90,000

18 MW (WHRB- 6 MW & AFBC-

12 MW)

The existing Plant (including violating units) is having 4x100 Ton DRI Kilns and 2x12 Ton

Induction Furnace with Billets Casting facility.

The present proposal is for obtaining environmental clearance fori

Unit s installed in the year 2006 and are under violation (2x100 Ton Sponge Iron plant

for 60,000 TPA Sponge Iron production and 2xl 2 Ton Induction Furnaces for 72,000

TPA Billets production)

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand lspat r-vt ~t .

( ~ ¢- ~ orrect r

Pagel3


Annexure-2


Expansion of the plant for production of Rolled products (TMT Bars) by installation

lx12 Ton Induction Furnace for production of 36,000 TPA Billets, 300 TPD Rolling Mill

for production of 90,000 TPA TMT Bar and 18 MW Captive Power plant (6 MW through

WHRB and 12 MW through AFBC Boiler).

3.6 Process Details •• >I

3.6.1 Sponge Iron Plant (Existing 2x100 TPD, Under Violation 2x100 TPD)

Sponge iron or DRI (direct reduced iron ) is the product obtained from direct reduction of

iron ore. Reduction causes .elimination of oxygen leaving behind a honeycomb like porous

structure which is "Spongy" in nature. Hence the name is Sponge Iron. Sponge Iron or

Direct Reduced Iron, DRI as it is popularly known, is a high ferrous content charge material

and is used as a substitute for steel scrap as the primary raw material in the Induction

Furnace, during the process of manufacture of steel. Sponge Iron is becoming increasingly

important around the world as a raw material source for high quality steel; India being no

exception. In the mid- seventies, the Department of Steel had identified that sponge iron

would play a major role in the growth of the secondary steel sector. Apart from making the

secondary steel sector less vulnerable to fluctuations in the international scrap prices by

reducing dependence on imports, increased domestic production of sponge iron and the

consequent reduction of scrap imports have led to substantial savings in foreign exchange.

There are two well-established processes for the manufacture of sponge iron, namely:

(a) The reformed natural gas process i.e. by the gaseous reduction of the iron ore.

(b) Coal based Rotary Kiln process- Solid reduction.

DRI or Sponge Iron process can use either gas or coal as a reducing agent. Since, in India

availability of gas is limited, coal based DRI are predominant. Proven technology of Coal

based Rotary Kiln process: Solid waste reduction is being used in the existing Sponge Iron

kilns of 4x100 TPD and comprises the following major facilities:

• Raw Material Handling & Feeding System

• Main Processing System - Kiln

• Cooling System

• Product Separation System

• Waste Gas Cleaning System

• Plant De dusting

Four numbers of 100 TPD each rotary kiln is producing 120,000 metric tons of sponge iron

annually considering 300 working days. The raw materials required for sponge iron

production are high grade ores, non-coking coal and dolomite. The annual requirement of

raw material for the production of 120,000 MT of sponge iron is as below. Sponge iron is

presently being used in Steel melting Shop for production of Billets and rest sold. However,

M/s Vardan Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand lspat f'vr L~td

j\ r- (_ ' :

Ofrecta

Page14

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

Jharkhand I spat Pvt. Ltd.

Annexure-2


after t he proposed expansion complete sponge iron produced in the plant will be used in

the steel m elt ing shop.

Table 3.2: Capacities and Raw Materials Requirements

Unit Installed Capacity Working Days Annual Production

Sponge Iron Plant 4x100TPD - 300 120,000 MT

Water Requirement Make Up Water 300 324m3/day

Raw Material Size (mm) Ratio Quantity (MT/Annum)

Iron Ore/Pellet 5-18 1.7 204000

Non·Coking Cool 2: 20 1.4 168,000

Dolomite/Limestone 2-4 0.05 6,000

Sponge Iron Process Flow Diagram along with WHRB

M/s Vardon Environet .. Gurugrom Jharkhand I spat Pvt. ~t .

( ~ L - ,

Direct r

Poge15

Jharkhand IspatPvt. Ltd.

3.6.2 Steel Melting Shop

Annexure-2


Induction Furnace (Under Violation 2xl2 Ton, Proposed lxl2 Ton)

IF are basically furnaces meant for use of Sponge Iron as major raw material to produce

mild steel. These furnaces work on the principal of electromagnetic induction. After the

furnace is switched on, current start flowing ar 41 high rate and comparatively low voltage

through the induction coil of the furnace, producing an induced magnetic field inside the

central space of the coils where the crucible is located. The induced magnetic field thus

generated cut through the packed charge in the crucible. As the magnetic flux cut through

the scrap/pig iron and complete the circuit, they generate an induced current in the scrap.

The induced current as it flows the highly resistive path of scrap mix, generate tremendous

amount of heat and melting the scrap. When these additives have melted completely, the

power input may be increased to bring the temperature of metal up to the point most

desirable for pouring. The current is then turned off and the furnace is tilted for pouring

into the ladle. As soon as pouring has ceased, the crucible is cleaned completely from any

slag or metal droplets adhering to the wall of the crucible and the furnace is now ready for

charging again. An induction crucible furnace differs from arc furnace in the ways, which are

important metallurgy, though both types of furnaces are used for making steel from scrap

and alloys. Induction furnace do possess the following characteristics:

- High relatively, narrow melting vessel

- Low Crucible wall thickness

- Relatively small area of metal in contact with slag

- Low slag temperature

- No carburizing during melting down

- Powerful bath motion

Two nos. 12T induction furnaces (each with two crucibles and a common power supply)

are in operation through which production of 72000 TPA MS Billets is done. Additional

lx12Ton Induction Furnace is proposed for increasing the MS Billet production by 36000

TPA.

Table 3.3: Product Details of Induction Furnace

Production from 2x12 T Production from 1x12 T Parameters Induction Furnace under Induction Furnace

Violation Proposed

Production of MS Billets (98% Yield) 72,000 36,000

Production of liquid steel (Tons/yr) 73,500 36,750

Operating days 300 300

Tap-to-tap time, min 120-130 120-130

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand lspal Pvt. L~ z. r1 L '

or recto

Poge16

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

[harkhand !spat Pvt. Ltd.

Production from 2x12 T Parameters Induction Furnace under

Violation

No. of Heats (per day) 20-21

Furnace capacity (Tons) 2x12

Annexure-2


Production from 1x12 T Induction Furnace

Proposed

10 * 11

lx12

It may be seen from the Table above that tap~t6 tap time has been aimed at approx. UO

minutes enabling production of lQ-11 heats per day from each Induction Furnace. The

Induction Furnace lining will require repair I replacement after about 15-16 heats. Lining

repair will be done in-situ. )n order to ensure uninterrupted operations a second crucible,

lined and ready should be available. Thus, each furnace station will consist of two crucibles,

complete with all fitting and auxiliaries, installed adjacent to each other.

Continuous Casting Machine (Under Violation- 2x6/11m, Proposed- lx6/11m)

The existing continuous caster is capable of serving the three induction furnaces.

However, for ensuring uninterrupted operations and to improve productivity of the shop,

one additional 6/llm Billet Caster is proposed.

The ladle containing liquid steel is placed on the turret and brought over the tundish. The

tundish act as a buffer and enable the liquid steel to move homogeneously down through

nozzles, provided at the bottom of the tundish into moulds. The automatic mould level

controller controls the steel level in the mould. The subsequent primary and secondary

cooling transform the liquid steel into billets of the required dimensions and is drawn out

with the help of a withdrawal and straightener unit and cut into required length by the

shear provided in each strand. Once a ladle is emptied another ladle is brought into the

casting position and the casting continues. The billets are gradually shifted to the cooling

beds and then stacked orderly at the dispatch end for outside dispatch. The details about

the cast number and quality of billets are marked on the billet stack.

CCM fs used to produce billets of cross-sections 100 sq. mm to 135 sq. mm. as per

demand.

Jnar\t.nand \spat ' v . - ~td· ( ' l ~Ire tor ~

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Pagell

[harkhand lspat Pvt. Ltd.

Annexure-2


Steel Melting Shop Process Flow Diagram

3.6.3 Rolling Mill (Proposed)

The company proposes addition of 300 TPD Hot Rolling Mill unit. Red hot billet from CCM

will be directly fed to Rolling mill for production of TMT Bar. Production of Billets from the

proposed plant will be 108,000 TPA. Out of this approx. 91,800 TPA Billets will be fed to the

Rolling Mill for production of 90,000 TPA TMT Bars and rest will be sold in the market.

It is envisaged that hot billets coming out from billet caster at 950-1000°( will be directly

rolled without re-heating. Billets which will not be rolled directly due to mill being down or

any other reason will be sold in the market.

Rolling Mill has been envisaged to produce about 90,000 tons per annum of TMT Bar. It

will use 100 x 100 mm to 135 x 135 mm continuous cast billets from the Steel Melting

shop. The product range from the mill will cover rebars 8-32 mm.

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram PagelS

Jharkhand lspat Pvl. !-t . {~ . (_ '

Direct r


Annexure-2


The bar mill will be cross country mill to roll plain and ribbed bars. The proposed mill is a

12-stand mill, the stands arranged in a cross-country fashion. The mill will be designed to

roll at a maximum finishing speed of about 20 m per second. The rolled bars are cooled

when required by a water-cooling stretch for controlling the cooling rate to achieve the

desired tensile strengths. This enables production of high-quality reinforcing bars, without _,. having to take recourse to the subsequent coltl ~isting operations.

Rolling Mill Process Flow Diagram

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Page1.9 Jharkhand !spat Pvt. Ltd.

Z ~ (L ~ I~ Direct~r


Annexure-2


3.6.4 Captive Power Plant (Proposed)

Total power generation for the proposed power plant is 18 MW using Steam Turbine

Generator set. Production of steam required for power generation is proposed from

following sources:

• Installation of four (4) nos. of Waste Heat ijeQ)very Boilers capable of producing 9-lOT/h

of steam each from the hot flue gases produced from exist ing 4 x lOOTon DRI Rotary

Kilns. Power generation from WHRB will be 6 MW.

• Installation of AFBC type boiler for steam generation using waste char as fuel

supplemented by coal firing to the extent required. Capacity of the boiler is proposed as

60 T /h of steam to ensure production of 12 MW power even when three out of four

kilns are in operation.

Power is generated through Waste Recovery Boiler (WHRB) & Atmospheric fluidized Bed

Combustion Boiler (AFBC).

S. No. Particulars Capacity

1. With steam from WHRB 6MW

2. With steam from AFBC 12MW

TOTAl POWER GENERATION (Common T.G.) 18MW

Waste Heat Recovery Steam Generators {WHRSGs) for Sponge Iron Kilns

Each Kiln has a Waste Gas Volume of 22,000 to 25,000 Nm3 discharged at 900 to 950°C

(950°C maximum).The gas is presently being cooled in a Gas Cooler to a temperature of

about 180°C and then cleaned in an electrostatic precipitator before released into

atmosphere through Induced Draught Fan and Steel Chimney. The heat of the gases is

presently not utilized for any useful purpose.

It is possible to utilize the heat of waste gases by installing a Waste Heat Recovery Steam

Generator (WHRSG) for each Kiln. The well tried out configuration for WHRB is comprised

of an Evaporator, Super-heater in two (2) sections and an Economizer which will bring

down the temperature of gases from 900-950°C to 180°C and produce 9 to 10 TPH Steam

at a pressure of 66 Ata and 490°C.

Technological Features of WHRSGs

The technological features of the WHRSG shall be as follows:

Type: Single Drum Water Tube with Radiant Chamber

Type of Water Circulation: Natural Circulation

Atmospheric Bubbling Fluidized Bed Combustion {AFBC) Boiler

The boiler is envisaged to use the following solid fuels:

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugrom Jharkhand lspat Pvt. Ltd.

,!( ~ ,(_ , I -o trectr

Page20


Annexure-2


a. Char generated as solid waste in the existing Kilns. It has average calorific value of 1200

Kcai/Kg. The annual generation of Char is 30,000 Tons.

b. Coal with an average calorific value of 3800 Kcai/Kg. Annual requirement is expected to

be about 61,500 Tons

Selection of Type of Boiler

Based on the experience of working of boilers for identical application in similar plants, an

Atmospheric Bubbling Fluidized Bed Combustion (AFBC) Boiler is considered to be the ideal

choice. It has the following advantages:

• No need to grind the coal as required for Pulverized fuel firing. The boiler uses a fuel

size of -6 mm.

• As a result of better heat transfer, the unit size and hence the capital costs are reduced.

• It can respond rapidly to changes in load demand since thermal equilibrium between the

fuel particles in the bed is quickly established.

• Low combustion temperature of 800 to 900°C inhibits formation of nitrogen oxides.

• Due to low bed temperature, it can use coal of high ash content upto SO%. Even coals

with 70% ash can be efficiently burnt.

• Dolomite I Lime are used in the bed material to take care of sulphur in the fuel from

pollution ppint of view. Hence high sulphur coals can be used. The Flue Gas

Desulphurization System is not required, thus reducing the capital cost.

• Combustion temperature can be controlled accurately which helps in achieving better

life of tubes in boiler components.

Description of Proposed AFBC Boiler

The Boiler selected for Coal & Char firing is atmospheric bubbling type fluidized bed

combustion boilers of 60 TPH steaming capacity to ensure total 12 MW Power even when

three kilns are in operation.

The Boiler is designed for firing coal and char as the main fuel. The Boiler is lighted up

using Diesel Oil. The complete furnace section is made of water-cooled membrane wall

construction arranged as a gas & pressure tight envelope. Refractory i.s provided inside the

furnace on the water wall for a suitable height.

The steam drum is designed and provided simple and efficient drum internals, resulting in

high steam purity at all load condition of boiler output.

Electrostatic precipitators are envisaged for dust collection. The ESP is designed to limit the

outlet emission to 30 mg/Nm3. The blow down system for the boiler includes one of CBD

and one lBO tank with all associated drains and vents, level gauges, temperature and

pressure gauges etc. The boiler is provided 2 nos. of feed pump along with motor drive.

One spray-cum-tray deaerator with storage tank is provided.

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand. lspat i- •Jt lt~d Page21

""- --, (_ ' /

Ofrecto


T.G. SET

Annexure-2


There will be two (2) nos. of Turbo-Generators in the CPP, rated 6MW & 12MW. The

generators proposed will be air cooled, three- phase, star connected, two pole machines

directly driven by the steam turbines. The rotor winding is directly cooled by air whereas

the stator winding is indirectly cooled.

Fuel Requirement

Calculat ion of mixed fuel requirement:

Table 3.4: Fuel Requirement for Power plant

WHRB

Hot Flue Gases 4 x 25,000 Nm3 /hr from ABC of DRI kilns

AFBC

ttem Composition per Requirement Requirement

unit of fuel MT per day MT per year

CHAR (CV -1200 Kcai/Kg) 0.34 100.0 30,000

COAL (CV- 3800 Kcai/Kg) 0.66 195.8 58,750

Source of Power

The mainstay for the power supply will be the captive generation facility. However, there

will be link with the grid for both the receipt of power as well as export of excess power.

The plant substat ion will be connected over 132 KV overhead transmission lines from the

nearest Grid substation of the power supply authority. The 132 KV overhead line feeders

will be terminated at the Main Receiving and Step-down Substation (MRSS) to be

established at the plant site.

The TG sets will be connected to the MRSS 11 kV Main Distribution Board. A measure of

optimization will be required between the amount of power purchased and the power

exported to the grid.

3.6.6 Other Facilities

Plant Water System: Water required in Cooling Tower as make up, OM Plant as Boiler

feed and in Softening Plant. Water is also required to produce treated water to maintain

its ppm or hardness or conductivity, increased due to contamination in cooling line. Raw

water requirement shall be met from Damodar River. It is proposed to adopt fully re

circulating systems in all areas of the plant. As a result, the net water requirement will get

limited to the losses in the system only. The water system shall be designed for 'Zero

discharge' outside the plant.

Compressed Air System: Compresses air is required primarily at three locations in the


J harkhand !spat Pvt. ~t .

""' t L, "' Oirect r


Annexure-2


plant viz. in Induction Furnace, in CCM & in Dust Extraction System (bag filters). One

number non-lubricated screw compressor along with refrigerated air dryers of 600

Ncum/hr. capacity shall be provided for power plant.

Fire Protection System: Adequate fire-fighting equipment has been provided for each

production unit. An FDA system shall be housed in Power plant Main Control Room with ' ...

smoke detectors installed in sub-station, PLC room, etc. Portable C02 fire extinguishers,

sand buckets etc. shall be provided in MCC rooms. A firewater ring main is proposed as

required by TAC. Different types and sizes of portable fire extinguishers will be installed in

various areas of plant as per the relevant Indian standards.

Following systems of fire protection has been provided in the steel plant:

• Water hydrants network around all the shops.

• Smoke detectors in critical areas such as control rooms

• C02type portable fire extinguishers for electrical rooms flooding system and

• Foam type fire extinguishers near lubrication, hydraulic and fuel oil installation.

Adequate number of portable fire extinguishers will be provided at various locations in the

plant shed, LT panel room & DG set room.

Plant Electrical System: Plant Electrical System will have a 33 or 132 kV outdoor type sub

station. The power supply through furnace transformers will be supplied to furnace

whereas power supply through auxiliary transformer which will be used for EOT crane

operations, CCM operations, furnace auxiliaries, pumps for cooling water, lighting etc.

Emergency Back-up Power: Two {2) nos. of 500 KVA each & 1 no of 320 & 750 KVA

respe.ctively silent type DG set has been provided for power to the auxiliaries of plant when

grid power is not available. Another 1 no. of 500 KVA DG Set will be provided. This will also

be useful for emergency power to take care of safe shut down of important auxiliaries of

plant. During total power failure, above DG set will also support for emergency lighting for

personnel movement in some main location of steel plant.

Storage Yard: Raw material shall be brought to the yard in trucks are unloaded and stacked

indifferent piles by pay loaders.

3.7 RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENT

The proposed site is located near the National Highway. The Raw materials and products

can easily be transported to the site. The site Is also close to the raw material availability

area for the project. Since the total quantity of raw material to be transported is about 3.0

to 3.5 times the quantity of projected finished products; it affects the production cost

substantially. The main mode of transportation is by rail till Barkakana railway siding and

then by road (approx. 2.71 Km).

M/s Vardon Environet~ Gurugrom ~ , j 'd Page 13 Jharkhand lspa~ r \o\ . ... \~-

"" r , t ~ r Olrect


Annexure-2


Table 3.5: Raw Material Requirement of Existing and after the Proposed Expansion

Sl. Item Per MTof Requirement MT per Year

No. Product Existing (Non- Existing Proposed

Sponge fron

1. Iron Ore 1.7

2. Coal 1.4

3. Dolomite 0.05

Total ·3.15

SMS-Induction Furnace- liquid Steel

1. Sponge Iron 1.0

2. Scrap 0.225

3. Revert Scrap

Total 1.225

Continuous casting Machine- Billets

1. Liquid Steel 1.02

Total 1.02

Rolling Mill Plant

1. MS Billet 1.02

Total 1.02

Captive Power Plant 18MW (Proposed)

WHRB

1. DRI Gas- 4x25,000Nm3 /hr

AFBC Boiler

1. Dolochar

2. Coal

Total

3.8 RESOURCE OPTIMISATION

Water Requirement

Violating (Violating

Units} Units)

60000 60000 -10_?;0,PO 102,000 -

84,000 84,000 -

3,000 3,000 -189,000 189,000 -

73,500 36,750

- 73,500 36,750

- 15,540 6,810

1,000 1,460

- 90,040 45,020

72,000 36,000

- 73500 36750

- 73500 36750

- - 90000

- - 91800

- - 91800

6MW

12MW

Ratio- 0.34 30,000

Ratio -0.66 58,750

1.0 88,750

Total

-204,000

168,000

6,000

378,000

110,250

110,250

22,350

2,460

135,060

108,000

110,250

110,250

90,000

91,800

91,800

6MW

12MW

30,000

58,750

88,750

Total Water requirement of the proposed plant and for the existing plant is 2906 KLD and

shall be met by sourcing water from Damodar River. Water will be received at the plant

through a rising main from the river.

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand !spa\ Pvt.~Ltd . .J r (_ '" ~"'- Oire tor

Page24


Annexure-2


Permission for drawl of 0.65 MGD from Damodar River has been obtained from Oamodar

Valley Corporation vide letter no MRO/Tariff Ceii/ JIPL/66 dated 04/ 02/2019. Agreement

copy enclosed.

Table 3.6: Water Requirement for the Existing & Proposed Plant

Water Requirement(m3/day)

Unit Existing (Non- Existing Total Make-up V!olating (Violating Expansion water

Units) Units) requirement

Sponge Iron (DRI) Plant 162 162 324

SMS - Induction Furnace 170 85 255

SMS- CCM 67 33 100

Power Plant 2052 2052

Rolling Mill 150 150

Drinking & Sanitation 8 7 10 25

Total 170 406 2330 2906

3.9 SOLID WAm GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT

Type of Waste Quantity in Tons (TPA) Mode of Disposal

Existing Existing Proposed

(Non- Violating

Violating Units

Units)

Sponge Iron Plant

Dolochar 15,000 15,000 --- Will be used in AFBC Boiler

Oedusting Dust 11,040 11,040 - Will be given to nearby Sint er

plant

Wet Scrapper 1,800 1,800 --- -Sludge

Steel Melting Shop

IF Slag -- 11,000 5,500 After metal recovery (approx.

10%), remaining slag shall be

crushed and will be used as

aggregates

IF Bag Filt er -- 2,200 1,100 Shall be given to nearby Sinter

Dust Plant or Pellet Plant

Scale -- 500 250 Shall be given to nearby Sinter

Plant


]harkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd.

Type of Waste Quantity in Tons (TPA)

Existing Existing Proposed

(Non- Violating

Violating Units

Units)

" Rolling Mill

Mill Scale -- --- 840

CPP . Fly-ash from - - 13,780

WHRB

Fly-ash from -- - 38,000

AFBC

Bottom Ash -- - 9,500

from AFBC

Coal fines from -- - 4,500

CHP

Total 27,840 41,540 73,470


Annexure-2


Mode of Disposal

Shall be given to nearby Sinter

Plant

Will be sold to nearby Cement

Plant

Will be sold to nearby Cement

Plant

Will be sold to the nearby Brick

kiln owners, to be used as fuel in

their Kilns

Will be used for Coal injection in

DRI Kilns

Page26

Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Pre-Feasibility Report

M/s Vardan Environet, Gurugram Page 27

3.10 PLANT LAYOUT DRAWING

4SON

350N

!SON

lOON

OON

) .. _ ....... ,_ .. _ .. ___ _ ......... -.. -- .. ----.. -· ....

L

T

· lOll£ ·~E OE IOOE

!

NON-VIOlATING AREA 1

.,. . ~ ·~ ...

ISOE

.. . .

T

,,

250£ 300E

T

s

EXISTING UNITS

1 SPONGE IRDN4• !00T t.lf.!JUCOOP<t FUAHACf WffiiCCM Z•"%'"

PROPOSED UNITS

:J r.i0U.::: ~ ~\JFtHAC£ I

• PCM'E.R PlANT 11 W.. ~~o MOU.NJWIU..IOOOOTPA

J harkhand lspat Pvf. td.

1/..... r c.. '

Direc r

400E

]harkhattd Ispat Pvt. Ltd.

4.1 CONNECTIVITY

Site Location

Height above MSL

Road Connectivity

Rail Connectivity

Nearest Airport

Nearest Habitation

Nearest River

National Park, Wildlife Sanctuary,

Reserve Forest within 10 kms.

CHAPTER4 SITE ANALYSIS

Village: Hesla, P.O.: Argada,

Annexure--2


District- .RatJ~garh, State - Jharkhand

335m

SH-2 is at a distance of 2.56 kms. in South direction &

NH-20 is at a distance of 7kms in East direction

Argada Railway Station is at 600 meter in SE direction

Birsa Munda Airport Ranchi is at 45 kms in SW direction

Argada Village is at 500 m distance in West direction

Damodar River is at 300 meter distance in South direction

Nil within 10 kms.

4.2 LAND FORM, LAND USE AND LAND OWNERSHIP

The land use is Industrial. The total land required for the project is 35.54 Acres (14.38 Ha.).

The existing land of the plant is 25.54 Acres (10.34 Ha.). Additional 10 Acres (4.04 Ha.) is

taken on 30 years lease with M/s Durga Cements Co. ltd., Ramgarh.

4.3 TOPOGRAPHY OF THE LAND

The district is a part of Chotanagpur Plateau. Important physiographic feature of the

district is the Damodar Trough/ Basin/Rift zone. This E-W trending rift zone of Damodar

valley, presently filled by Gondwana sediments, dissects the Chotanagpur Plateau in to two

parts-Ranchi and Hazaribag Plateau. Barka Pahar (Marang Buru) 1,049m (3,442 ft) high

above sea level located along the Ramgarh-Ranchi border is probably the highest peak and

it also separates the districts.

The general topography of Ramgarh is undulating. The physiographic characterist ics of the

district are rich with waterfalls, hills, and land with avalanches. Southern fringes of

Ramgarh are surrounded by green forest. River Damodar flows through the town

The district covers 487.93 Sq. Km. forest area. The district is Rich in Flora and Fauna.

Government has planned a deer park in the district. The park will come up on 25 acres (10

Ha.) on Gola-Muri Road in Gola Block. 30 Villages in the district is Tuskers affected.

atPVt~td. J~ar\<.hand \sp ~ r L t '

O\r \or

M/s Vardon Envlronet Gurugram Page28


4.4 EXISTING & PROPOSED LAND USE PATTERN

Land use details of the project is as follows:

Annexure-2


Table 4.1: Land Use of Plant Layout

Sl. Non-

Violation Proposed Total area in Item Violation

No area in Ha.

1lfea in Ha. area in Ha. Ha.

1. Plant and Machinery 1.42 1.62 1.84 4.88

2. Raw material storage 0.67 0.49 0.76 1.92

3. Admin building and •

0.49 1.23 0.20 1.92 others

4. Roads 0.15 0.42 0.34 0.91

5. Greenbelt area 0.50 0.65 3.6 4.75

Total Area 3.23 4.41. 6.74 14.38

4.5 EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE

Infrastructure available for water supply, power (including back-up power), Lab, weigh

Bridge, Drinking Water, Rest Room, Toilets, Medical Unit, Staff Quarters. No additional

facilities required

4.6 SOIL CLASSIFICATION

Mainly two type of soil found in District -Red Soil and Sandy loam. Three soil orders namely

Entisols, lnceptisols and Alfisols were observed in the district.

4.7 CLIMATE DATA

The area lies in the sub-humid region of Chotanagpur Plateau and enjoys semi-extreme type

of climate. The day temperature rises around 40°C during the summers and drops down to

around 10°( during the winter.

The average annual rainfall of the district is 1104.42 mm. More than 80% of the

precipitation is received during the monsoon months.

Maximum dry bulb temperature 40°(

Minimum dry bulb temperature 10°C

Maximum Relative Humidity % 80%

Minimum Relative Humidity % 60%

Rainfall during monsoon About 125 em annually

M/s Vardan Environet~ Gurugram Jharkhand lspat Pvt. L?;pge29 ~ t t L - ~

Olrecto

Tharkha1td I spat Pvt. Ltd.

5.1 PLANNING CONCEPT

CHAPTERS

PLANNING BRIEF

Annexure-2

Pre-Feasibiliht Report

The project is for obtaining environmental clearance for the Units installed in the year 2006

which are under violation (2x100 Ton SpongE!I Iron plant for 60,000 TPA Sponge Iron

production and 2x12 Ton Induction Furnaces for 72000 TPA Billets production) and

Expansion of the plant for production of 90,000 TPA Rolled products (TMT Bars) by

installation l x12 Ton Induction Furnace foe production of 36,000 TPA Billets, and 18 MW . Captive Power plant (6 MW through WHRB and 12 MW through AFBC Boiler).

The project shall be implemented within 24 months after grant of Environmental Clearance

from Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change and Consent to Establish from

Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board.

Material will be transported by Rail till Barkakana railway siding and then by road (approx.

2.71 Km). For transportation purpose the company shall arrange a few vehicles of their

own.

5.2 POPULATION PROJECTION

Total Manpower on full operation of the plant will be 394. Manpower requirement for

operation of ,the non-violating and violating units is 220. Manpower of about 174 nos. will

be required for operation of the project under the expansion. As locally unavailable

professionals, skilled, semi-skilled with their families will contribute in increase in

population from this project. The increase in population may further increase lively hood

associated activities in the project nearby area.

5.3 LAND USE PLANNING

The existing and proposed land use plan is as follows:

s. Item

Non· Violation Violation Proposed Total area No area in Ha. area in Ha. area in Ha. in Ha.

1. Plant and Machinery 1.42 1.62 1.84 4.88

2. Raw material storage 0.67 0.49 0.76 1.92

3. Admin building and

0.49 1.23 0.20 1.92 others

4. Roads 0.15 0.42 0.34 0.91

5. Greenbelt area 0.50 0.65 3.6 4.75

Total Area 3.23 4.41. 6.74 14.38

M/s Vardon Enviranet, Gurugram Jharkhand lspat Pvt.~t .

~ fl ¢: ,. Olrect r

"

Page30

[harkhand I spat P11t. Ltd.

5.4 ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEMAND

Annexure.-2


Project is located in area with already available infrastructure. The plant has well connected

National Highway as mentioned in the above chapters. Plant has also well-developed

connecting roads inside plants for movement of raw material, storage areas for raw

materials and finished products since the plant is under operation. ' "

There is no additional infrastructure required for the proposed expansion.

S.S AMENITIES I FACIUTIES

The following facilities are ah"eady available at the project site as it is an operational plant:

• Administration Building

• Stores

• Time and security offices

• First aid and fire-fighting station

• Canteen and welfare center

• Toilets and Rest rooms

• Car parks and cyde I scooter stands

No other additional facilities are proposed.



CHAPTER6

PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE

6.1 INDUSTRIAL AREA (PROCESSING AREA}

Annexure-2


The processing area will comprise of various pl'Wt facilities within the existing plant area

they are - DRI Kilns, Induction Furnace, Rolling Mill and Captive Power Plant Areas, TG

House, Raw Material Storage are~s. etc. Thus, total area of 6.8 Ha. will be developed as

processing area. .

6.2 RESIDENTIAL AREA (NON-PROCESSING AREA)

There will be no residential area for the proposed project as the required manpower will be

sourced from local population. Facilities like Canteen, Rest room, Toilets are already exists.

Non processing area of the plant is 7.58 Ha. which comprise of facilities within the premises

such as -Administrative block, Road and Greenbelt

6.3 GREEN BELT

Out of 14.38 Ha (35.54 Acres) of the total area, 4.75 Ha (11.73 Acres) will be developed as

greenbelt. This greenbelt will serve as a buffer between the peripheries and the industry,

there by controlling the air emissions and noise levels.

6.4 CONNECTIVITY

The site is mainly connected by Ranchi Nai Sarai road which gets connected to NH-20.

However, the nearest major City being Ranchi, which is connected by Road, Rail, and

Airways will play a major role in the development of the area. Rail and road network will be

useful for transportation of raw materials and finished products.

6.5 DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT

Water requirement of the proposed power plant and that for the existing plant facilities

shall be met by sourcing water from Damodar river. Water will be received at the plant

through a rising main from the river, will be treated in Water Treatment Plant and is being

supplied for drinking purpose in Offices, Canteen and Work place. Employees are being

provided potable water for drinking.

6.6 SEWAGE SYSTEM

Sufficient and suitable toilet facilities of proper standard and hygiene have been provided.

These facilities are connected with Septic Tank with Soak Pit. ~~ lsnat P'IJt . L~td. JnarK.nan\.1 I"

.fl l \

'' "- Olrec r

M/s Vardan Environet~ Gurugram Page32


6.7 INDUSTRIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT

Annexure-2


There is no waste water discharge from the plant. Cooling water is being recycled after

cooling in the Cooling Towers. Blow down water from Cooling Towers are being used for

slag cooling and dust suppression. Zero discharge shall be maintained after the proposed

expansion. -~ Table 6.1: Solid Waste Management

Type of Waste Management

Dolo-char Shall be used in AFBC Boiler . Induction Furnace Slag Shall be used as aggregates for area development

after metal recovery

Bag Filter Dust Will be sold to nearby Sinter Plant I Pellet Plant

Mill Scale Will be sold to nearby Sinter Plant

Fly-ash Will be sold to the Cement Plants

Bottom Ash Will be given to the nearby Brick Kilns to be used as fuel in their Kilns

6.8 POWER REQUIREMENT & SUPPLY/ SOURCE

Power Requirement

Power to the Induction furnaces, the principal consumer will be provided at 11 kV. It is

expected that all the other requirements including roll ing mill drives will be LT. These will

be supplied through 11/0.433 KV load center substations (LCSS). There will be three (3)

nos. 415V LCSS to cater to the DRI plant, and Induction furnace auxiliary loads and rolling

mills.

The TG sets of the CPP will be connected to the CPP 11 kV Distribution Board which in turn

will be connected to the MRSS 11 kV Main Distribution Board through one (1) no. 11 kV tie

feeder for import and export of power from CPP. Besides the llkV Distribution board, one

(1) no. 11/6.9kV and one (1) no. llkV /0.433kV Load Centre Substations fed from the above

Distribution board will be formed in the CPP to cater to all HT and L T auxiliary loads.

Power will be generated at 11 kV and will be stepped up to 11 kV with interconnection to

the existing panel and provision for receiving power from grid or feed power back to the

grid when surplus. Power requirement for operation of the existing plant is 18 MW after

auxiliary power consumption of Power Plant.

Emergency Back-up Power: Two nos. of 500 KVA each & one no of 320 & 750 KVA

respectively silent type DG set has been provided for power to the auxiliaries of plant when

grid power is not available. Another 1 no. of 500 KVA DG Set will be provided. This will also

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand lspat Pvt. L~td

(_ "' L~ -

Dfrect r

Page33

Jharkhand lspat Pvt. Ltd.

Annexure-2


be useful for emergency power to take care of safe shut down of important auxiliaries of

plant. During total power failure, above DG set will also support for emergency lighting for

personnel movement in some main location of steel plant.

Table 6.2: Hourly Power requirement for Existing & Proposed Plant (MWH)

Power Power

requirement for requirement for Unit

Existing Non- Existing Violating

Violating Units Units .

DRI Sponge 0.80 0.80

Steel Melting -- 8.90

Rolling Mill -- ---CPP Auxiliary

TOTAL 0.80 9.70

Power avai lable from Captive Power Plant

Balance electric power from grid


Power requirement for Total Power

Proposed Units Requirement (MWH)

- 1.6

4.45 13.35

1.25 1.25

1.8 1.8

7.5 18

18

Nil

atP\Jt.~t · Jhar\<.nand \sP

.. \.. .. '- ~irec r ~

Page 34


CHAPTER 7

Annexure-2


REHIBILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R&R) PLAN

As there is no displacement of any human settlement, rehabilitation and resettlement plan

does not arise.

M/s Vardon Environet1 Gurugram Page 35


CHAPTERS PROJECT SCHEDULE & COST ESTIMATE

8.1 PROJECT SCHEDULE

Annexure-2


It will be noted that the schedule envisages commissioning of the entire plant in 24 months

from 'go-ahead'. The advance actions on the ptoject which will provide the appropriate

foundation for cost effective and timely implementation are:

a. Site clearance as required

b. Environmental impact -assessment study and clearance for implementation of the

project.

c. Finalization of the adequate details of the project to enable site activities to

commence from the date of 'go-ahead'

d. Issue of enquiries for the major packages and finalization of the orders for the same

e. Actions for linkages of coal, power, and water

S.No. Activity Schedule In Months

1 Consent to Establish Zero date

2 Placement of Order 1 months

3. Civil & Structural work 5 months

4. Procurement, Installation & Commissioning 18 months

Total 24 months

8.2 COST ESTIMATE

The estimated capital cost for the complete plant facilities including engineering,

contingency interest during construction, and margin money for working capital is given in

Table 8.1.

Table 8.1: Proposed Project Cost Estimate

Item of cost Rs Crs

Non-Violating Units (2x100 TPD DRI Kiln) 22.41

Violating Units 31.71

Proposed Unit

IF Shop 12.00

Bar Mill 40.00

Power Plant 80.00

Utilities and auxiliaries 8.00

Engineering and project management 4.50

Contingency 7.50

M/s Vardan Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand Jspat Pvt~d.

(\ ' ( .

Dire or

Poge36


Item of cost

Interest during Construction

Margin money for WC

Total

TOTAL COST (Non-violating+ Violating tiflits +

Proposed)

M/s Vardon Environet1 Gurugram

Annexure-2


Rs Crs

13.66

20.97

186.63

240.75

(22.41 + 31.71 + 186.63)

Page37

]harkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd.

CHAPTER 9

ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL

Annexure-2


Over the last few years, there has been a great change in the Indian Economic Scenario due

to Global slowdown which affected the whole world including India. The major sector which

took the toll was Steel & Power Sector. -(>

M/s Jharkhand !spat Pvt. Ltd. (JIPL) is presently operating 4 nos. of 100 Ton DRI Kilns for

production of 120,000 TPA Sponge Iron and two number of 12 Ton Induction Furnace with

Billet Caster for annual production of 72000 TPA MS Billets.

To make end product economically viable in present fluctuating market, JIPL have decided

to go for expansion for production of 90,000 TPA TMT Bars through installation of 1x12 Ton

Induction Furnace with Billet Caster and 300 TPD Rolling Mill.

Also, to utilize the sensible heat of DRI Flue gas, Waste Heat Recovery Boilers have been

proposed for production of 6 MW Power and AFBC Boiler production of 12 MW to utilize

the dolochar produced as by-product in DRI Kilns. This will reduce the dependency for the

power requirement on Grid.

The Directors of JIPL are experienced Industrialist, dynamic, practical, hardworking & self·

made entrepreneur. They have excellent reputation in & around Jharkhand, Bengal, Bihar,

Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh and North Eastern States. The products will be produced indigenously

and will be consumed in the country and also outside the country as per the demand.

The management team consists of experienced and matured professionals. The team is

quite capable of managing the business. Therefore, no financial problem is envisaged.

The technology involved in expansion project is well proven and reliable. Many plants are

operating all over the country in this pattern are successful. All equipment purchased shall

be brand new & latest in model and will be purchased from reputed suppliers. For O&M of

the plant, experienced Engineers /Technicians are available in the region.

The demand for TMT Bar which is about 30% of the total Steel Consumption in the country

is expected to grow from 22.0 Million Tons per annum to about 44.0 Million Tons per

annum by 2020.TMT Rebar are used as Steel Reinforcement Bars in the construction sector

for building the houses, industrial buildings, bridges for highways, roads & railways, schools,

airports, recreation centers, power plants & electrical distribution, civil works etc. The product

has demand in domestic and international market.

Profitability of project is quite attractive. Project is technically and financially viable with

positive impact on the local infrastructure.

M/s Vardon Environet, Gurugram Jharkhand !spat r-'vt f-t . Page 38

{ • L I

Olrect r

VCOMGGM104

Highlight


Annexure-2


The region shall also be benefited from the project as there will be direct employment of

people in the Steel plant. Preference will be given to the people of the state possessing

requisite skill and qualification criteria. Also, there will be lot of scope for indirect

employment of the people of the state in and around the project site like in transportation

sector.

In view of the above the Expansion Project of M/s Jharkhand lspat Private Umited is

technically feasible and financially viable} hence recommended for implementation. We

request EAC to recommend _TOR for conducting the EIA Study for obtaining Environmental

Clearance from Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change.

M/s Vardon Envlronet, Gurugram Page39

Annexure-3

Production Details and Cost of Project- M/s Jharkhand lspat Pvt Ltd

Cost of Project (Rs. In Crore) Land & Site Factory Plant & Total Development Building Machinery

1. Cost of Non-Violating Units 0.42 1.84 20.15 22.41

(2x100TPD Sponge Iron)

2. Cost of Violating Units - 5.84 25.87 31.71

(2x100TPD Sponge Iron + 240TPD MS Billets)

Details of Year-Wise Productjot11Details Prior violation

S.No Year of Production Description of Production Production Quantity (TPA)

1. 2004-05 Sponge Iron 36996.000

2. 2005-06 Sponge Iron 28049.000 Details of .Year-Wise Production Details after Violation

S.No Year of Production Description of Production Production Quantity

1. 2006-07 Sponge Iron 29672.000 2, 2007-08 Sponge Iron 27076.000

3. 2008-09 Sponge Iron 21225.000

4. 2009-10 Sponge Iron 20295.000

5. 2010-11 Sponge Iron 16996.000

6. 2011-12 Sponge Iron 21007.000

7. 2012-13 Sponge Iron 32735.000

8. 2013-14 Sponge Iron 56377.000

9. 2014-15 Sponge Iron 66177.000

lC 2015-16 Sponge Iron 71404.000

1l 2016-17 Sponge Iron 54818.600

12 2017-18 Sponge Iron 61225.000 1;:l 2018-19 I Sponge Iron 70873.000

14 2019-20 Sponge Iron 78134.000

Details of Year-Wise Production Details after Violation

S.No Year of Production Description of Production Production Quantity

1. 2006-07 Billet 32858.390

2. 2007-08 Billet 32627.275

3. 2008-09 Billet 41611.970

4. 2009-10 Billet 41518.500

5. 2010-11 Billet 40058.730

6. 2011-12 Billet 41755.400

7. 2012-13 Billet 39048.510

8. 2013-14 Billet 49740.000

9. 2014-15 Billet 41934.000 1( 2015-16 Billet 53073.500

1 2016-17 Billet 53694.000

1 .. 2017-18 Billet 52605.400

1 2018-19 Billet 62448.600 1~ 2019-20 Billet 72045.600

Jharkhand lspat Pvt&-Lt .

~ - L '

Dlrec or ...

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

OWIVEDI GUPTA & co_ Chartered Accounlants

29 A Sova Balar Stree 1~ Floor l(ol)(ata 7000!

Ph No.033-2554119·, Ema11. skdWived L [email protected]. lr

Annexure-3

MIS JHARKHANO ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH, 2006

Particulars

SOUR~S OF FUNDS : SHAREHOLDER'S FUNDS

Share Cap~al

R~~ & Surplus DEFER~~ TAX LIABILITY

LOAN FUNDS S.cured Loan UnsecurOO Loan

APPUCATION OF FUNDS FIXED ASSETS

Gross Block Less : Depreciation Net Block Capital Work -in-progress

CURRENTS ASSETS, LOANS & ADVANCES:

Schedule

1 2

3 4

TOTAL

5

tnventone~ 6 Sundry Debtor& '7 Cash & Bank Balances 8 Loans & Advanc&$ 9

Leu:CURRENT LIABILffiES AND PROVISIONS iO NET CURRENT ASSETS

MISCEt.J.ANEOUS EXPENOlTURE , (To ttu~ extent not written off) Pre·~mlnary Expenses Preoperative Elcpenses

Slgnjllunt Accounting Policies

NOTES ON ACCOUNTS As per our report of even date For OWIVEOI GUPTA & CO.

C"allad Accounta~-;::-: -.. ., ~ /l ' .. ~~~~>!;.\

PA :'ft" l---/. " .. ~ :; ) • 'I ·, -- -· · -; ~··j ~ .

PLACE : KOLKATA ·.' ->::~··</ DATED : ,: · 1 ',i nl.~ t:r:t.· ···-'

TOTAL: 19

20

Rs.

As at 31 .03.0&

171,670,000.00 4,593,381 .05 1,924,059 00

242.050,72.3.34 71 ,573,000.00

491 ,8 11 ,163.39

245.386,082.19 49,516.232.07

195,869,850.12 325,032,222.81 520,902,072:93

84,684.094.79 54,250,276.00

3,623,793.69 56,352,528.96

198,910.693.44 ~29,104 ,~.55 . (30.193,753. 12)

1.102,843.57

491 ,81, '163.39

Rs.

As at 31.03.05

141.020,000 00 3,8!l6.262.50 1,588,50 1 00

113,086,361.23 419,1 08,000.00

308,669,124 73

209,144,699.35 27 ,746)86 35

, 81.404.313.00 80,267',815.91

261 ,672', 128,91

44,454,067.34 72,568,955.00 2.667,926.34

47,930,577.08 167,621 ,525.76 122.n1 .032.93 44,850,492.83

1,470,459,00 676,043.99

308.669,124.73

For JHARKHAND ISPAT PVT. lTD

( ,(' j ,£1, • ft ,a.-v ;ur,~v-JJI,.f DIRECT~ DIRECTOR

H.O · C·1 , Vishwanath i<unj, DIG Co!c!ny, M A. Road, Vardnasi-02, Ph.No.0542~2502525.5540212

Jharkhand I spat ? J\ ~t ;l . (. . \_ Oirec r

-OWIVEOI GUPTA & CO

MIS JHARKHAND !SPAT PRIVATE li~ITED SCHEDULES FORMING PART OF THE BALANCE SHEET

Continuation Sht

Ra. F --------- - - -------. -- _______________ ...:..;.;:..;._ _____ ..:. Particulars Schedule As at 31.03.06 As at 31.03.0!

..... - - ·------'--r-----------SCHEDULE - 1 SHARE CAPITAL ; Authori•M St"re Capital 15,00,000 Eqwty Share of Rs. 100 each) (Previ~ year 15,00,000 Equity Shares)

t.•ued. Subscribed & Paid Up : 5,00,000 Equity Share of Rs. 100J- each snare Application Money

SCHEDULE - 2 RESERVES & SURPLUS : Profrt'& Lo" A/c. bff Add Transferred during the year

SCHEDULE· 3 SECURED LOANS A· State sank of India, C.B.Ranchi

(Secured by equitable mortgage of factory land & Building, hypothecation of Plant & Machinery. hypothecation of Stock & boOk debts of Sponge lron plant and Induction Fumace Plant at Hesla, Argada and also by the personal guarantee of diredOt'$.)

Tenn Loan Wortclng Capital loan

B· PunJ•b National Bank Working Capn.t Loan (Secured by hypothecation of Plant & Machinery.

Sto<:k & book debts of Crusher Plant al Meralg~dha, Novamundi and also by the personal ~guarantee of directors.)

c. Equipment Financ;e

(s~red by hypothecation of o1 vehicle~/equipments

1. ~rei International Finance Ltd. 2. HOFC Bank 3. fCICI Bank

SCHEDULE ·4 UNSECURED LOAN

150,000,000,00

50,000.000.00 121 ,670,000.00 171.670,000.00

3.586.262.5{) 727,118.55

4,593,381 .05

174,526.918.86 40,411.204.00

26,295.574.00

230.177 30 586,849.18

ZA2,050,723 .~

71 ,573,000 00

71,573,000.00

150,000,000:

50,000,000.1 91,020,000.1

141.020,000.4

1,030,065.! 2,836,197.1 3.868,262.!

88,579,617: 20,512,768 I

1,009.537.( 2,321 ,197.:

663 .• Z<f1.( 113,088,361.2

49.1 08.000.0

49,108,000.0

Annexure-3

Jharkhand lspat Pvt~· z . (_ . Olrec r

Annexure-3

--··-~-- - --- -OWIVEDI GUPTA & CO. Continuation Sheet

~ .. - .. --... ·---~ . ....... -----.. -·w. MIS. JHARKHAHD !SPAT PRIVATE liMITED

§EQ!fi& OIVISIQM

eld5uttrt 2005-2006

M* Ql!.tD!ll9 f'~ Q<~j

-IIJB!W ~ ~rod ~ales

lrOf'IOre nut. raG 46595 118 47640.00(\ Coli 7765 892 35187 5 10 3J578.000 DoloiT!ilc... 74 471) 13411555 1;\] 4 001}

amtl~ OS..Lir fEoducts iM. T.l Sponge Iron 630.370 18264.000 ~ 8288 SC\0 Lumps

Sponge ftun 475.565 9711 5,000 ~0146.3:'\CJ

f lf\eS Iron Ora Fin• 11111 .9J5 11567.290 1912.91(1

~BUSHER 12b!l§l~

ea~I,Yiit~ lOOS-2006

4

~CI!!!!.I Q.11m!lll PI.ICiibiH! ~ f.cQit.

{.M,!:l

Iron Ole lumps NIL 24672 280

fi!SIIj~ GOO~lDll er!!!Siwa.IM:I·I tron Ore SiZe/ NIL 23116 520 Fines

(SI(!Mture lo the Schedules Anrtexed)

(AI per our report of eve11 date).

For C>WIV!DI GUPTA & CO., Chamre<t Aceountants

" . "'~·~, i '·, \_l .. -·

- .-1 • • • • t

(P J----2' . \ .. /

PLACE:KOLKATA- . : ·.~;

I . ·-·-··· DATED: ~ r u \-' f ( ·~·

!t..<?m.: G~

224•3 810

12;.52 .0fl:l

(4 i

.. ;oo4-20os <.;!9.J!M ~ e!H~ ~.!l!!ll c~ ~~ ~ elllll ~ ~~

nu74 904 2919.216 70314.390 65513.520 7719.736 !I!J75 402 3510.126 46947.768 42692.000 7765 !192

-1 0.033 216 74(\ 1<42 1.322 1563.590 7~ .478

li05.710 70.535 24058 000 23498 !65 630,370

114.235 36.~85 12930.000 1249a.no <475.!165

8~26.3 1 ~ 7722.355 5940.420 1181.935

2ftHOOI ~wg ~ Purro.u/ ContJ ~ S!.~ 011 ~ ~ ~

~

2228 450 Nil NIL NIL NIL

t06M.440 Nil NIL Nl~ NIL

For AND ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

t '\ it\ . DIRECT~

II

(}.yt U·v 1/(.IA-v~ ... :~. "'

DIReCTOR

Jhatkhano tspat Pvl ~· \z.( . ~ ,. 0 1rec r

Annexure-3

WS JIIAMOIAIIIII»ATPIIIIIAn I.MTD i<: .. DtA,aO' RUl)AIUT'fAS A"15TIIMCH': I

l'aaJMaJI ._. . !iftO~ BUlCit DI~TII)N . Nlif ILDCK

/Uon0\,114.011 --~ s.loolf .... ~, TOTAL \JI>lO 01 .04 Oil llurlllg lilt .... TOTAl. AI en Aao~ , •• OJ.oe Aaan 3103~

.... j4laiiT ' ' "''"' / :II .OS.OC

~· ... ~ . 3.toe.lle?.S7 l57~JGO - ~~-11 . ~ 10,<140.57 1.eoe.Oa157 ,-'1.....,. 10.00% 14,4!St.lM.I7 l . 12C. Ill GO 1Un.aR4..t t I,SQ.WJ.l~ 1,$23.5ll3l 3.1CS.S7Q~ 15271.453.&1 13.,074,l!i()t)

()lllao ..... SOC% 224,!a&600 :rl4.liii&.OO )073 30.13 114,1'3717 ....... _..ty '"''~ 175.&31,21!6.82 22.!92.7311110 . 10',.$)0m¥1 ZZ.IlUOUl 1!41UI!~ 3oUI6.221• •n .meo:ue IS.,l1~6$2. ..

Jai Me- IT._ 30.001(, 9,11(19,571 .30 3, lecl.OOO.OO . ll ,IISS,&71.30 ),fto!.~e3 '1 714,831!.111 6~11)234 SJ60,'MT6 0.315.301167

C«l1ppAw 40 00'4 4.011,210.00 223,3t!O'J . 82i.GI!5.00 14U!P" 148,4:iUi 2iC.lS423 :lla.oon ~eU12.83

,uonke i F-• 1&10~ 5Ql.7lt.OO 2Tl,OH.W 77~ 75.300 U«H .• 114.111!0.31 110.6VS ~ ~- .&38.90:1 97 - C..Molar C)do' 256t% 60.lll 00 sso.~l co ~1 301.00 19,S77.C7 !>9,:l7S.~ 7t055e2 512,252.'t 30,7:..1 r.l ._ ~Equopr!WR rt1~ »! 803.!10

061 IU~ I 7t7,$2UO »~n n•loJO 126811063 ~2.0lol.l1 lt'!3'J,. - T- IJ tl% 7l1,moo . nr,e,3.oo 281),~15.25 n.enoo JC.~~ Jtal,llk74 411,6(!74

TCQio &T- 11111~ ·~.OII!i$ ·-·'!600 ·~-~51 B9 2011011 !la3at OS ~·S2 18 4,0!Z,IIIldll '00:10.SO

1 . TOTAL•

I 2:li. '« li!IV.3S 36 74 1 ,18~ ... ~·! :t&,C182. 111 2)740~.36 • 21.776~•~ '12 09,5 1S,2J1.0' ·~.li09~1~ i ii1.<C4,3:~.fN

C.plul W<trtlln 1'•1>819U ', l ,

Clri W11111 uncw Conal;,,.,_,~ I I 5.J11.30~15 5,311 ,501~ ; 5,311,106.66

,...,~lll*t Cl,ill l &17W I ~-1'/IQin

. - .,,,11,41110 . .l .tH.417.SO

I'IIOaln Cclrrtlol&!u~ 1,047.1115.20 u.r.se.~ 411.l011.Muol 20 E06.34HO .. ~.-20

laoiiiCiioft....,_", .. 70. So&9J! '5 15 l~&.m,ee•l . ~7.20l,15e,48 Ul.~), f5&48 10.S4UISS~ c--

c......~ t,STO,+It.08 ~,~, .. ~ UM.J5108 . 1.610.~01

Tlrull. · 80.217.81&.tl 14t.05U57.11& 4.2ti,IS1 OS lU,DSl.22211 . 32U:It222 11 1!0267,tl5.&1

CI!Ael OTAL . ..._.,Uf6JII 2tS.ltJ.70UO o,ue,J51.1!' - .• t .. 105.CO 11>40.-U :nnuun 4!1JJ16D2.07 s.l.to2.an .Q ~un.1n.t1

"'-Y- '"-'15.W.~ 2•1.m.u1 n tn,J20,2rtt.Jt • • 412,51S 2S 1 440.SII:UI ~1~.51 Z3381.81221 l1,1<0.118M lfl.e7l,12UI

tMIIVEOI GUPTA & CO Continuation Shet

MIS JHARKHANO ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED SCHEDULES FORMING PART OF THE BALANCE SHEET

Rs. Rs _______________________________ ___;;.;.;_ _____ ~ Particulars

SCHEDULE - & INVENTORIES : (A$ taken. vai\M and certified by the management)

Raw~rial Finished Goods & Stock in Process Storea, SparM & Coosumables Iron & S1eel Scrap

SCHEOULE.- 7

S<:hedule

SUNORV OEBTORS (Unsecured considered Good)

More thM Six Month Others

SCHEDULE · 8 Cesh tn Hanel (As certified by the management)

Bank Balances With Scheduled Banks :

In current Ale

FORa

As at 31 .03.06

40,616,395.25 32,452,575.0 3 11 ,061 ,624.51

553 500.00 84,684,0M, 79

15,390,127.00 38,860,149.00 54,250.276.00

1,666,918.42

146,675.2'7

1,810,000.00

3,623, 793.69

As at 31.03.05

30,883,922.0t 6,354,441.5( 5.215, 703.8-

16,750,749.0( 55,818.206.0( 12,561,956.00

986,936.44

1.292,542.90

388,447.00

2,87,921.34

Jhar~hano !spa\ Pvtf · ~ ' C-.

Dire tor

Annexure-3

-------,.,...,...---,-,.------------····· - OWIVEOI GUPTA & CO Continuation Sht

MISJHARKHAND ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED SCHEDULES FORMING P~RT OF THE BALANCE SHEET

Rs. F ·----·-·-------~;.;__----~

Particulars

,iCHEDULE • 9 LOANS & ADVANCES Unsecured.Contldered good)

Balanc') with Excise Balance with Jhanchand sales Tax Secunly Deposit Advane~ !noome Tax TDS R~ivable Fringe Benefit Tal( (Advance) Sundr-Y Advance for Capital Goods Advance to Raw Matenal Suppliers AdVance!l (Staff) Advance for Expenses Others Advances & Rec1evables Prepaid Expenses

SCHEDULE - 10 CURReNT LIABIUT1ES AND PROVISIONS

(A) CURRENT LIABILITIES ' Sundry'Creditor9 for Capital Goods & Suppliers SuCldry. Credd.ol'i for e.xpenses Advance from customers TDS Payable Dutie& & TaX4!s Payable OUtstanding Uabities liabllilies for Cheques issued

(B) PROVISIONS Provisions for Tuation: (Ass. Yr ~06-07, 05-06) Provisions for F.B. T

Schedule A.s at 31 .03.08

9,127,929.00 95,639.70

1,314.934.30 126,225.00

4.702.00 112,200.00

6,517,777.34 20,746,006.04

7,589,398.87 10,428,533.71

289.163.00

56,362,528..96

142,712,075.06 9,959,967.89

69,021,522.95 207.640.00 57 • . 056.00 597,041 ~00

5.ti91 ,143.65

228,753,448.56

121.000.00

220 000.00 ~1,000.00

....... ...

Aa at 31 .03.0!

3,935,358.

1.262,304, 11 ,794. 3.447.

21.825,933. 2,907,549.

55,480. 4;172,464.

13.438,620. 317,625.

47,930,577.

59,532,494. 10,058,351. 37,804,326.

567,359.1 3,939,305. 2,477,637.• 8,022,652 • ·.

122.402,325:

368,707 ';

368,707.1 .

Jharkhand lspat Pvt. ~/_ .

'/( ' '- O;re~

Annexure-3

(

·.

~ liDlTORS' ltf..I'OA1: 1:o nn: MtM6ERs qF MIS. ,llfA!lKFI.A J'il) IS PAT e RI VA•Tit liMITE II

'-'• n:,,.., Jodi!~'<! the ~t).MJ Oaur.cc Shed ot ~tf• J)iAR.KHANO I.Sf'AT PlUVi\l''Ji:

Ll<'Un:D Q> m Hs:t M: 'tb 2007 ~IIIli olt;OIIie Pro lit !11\d Lv$0' AceNIIIt f<Jt the JQI ~'lldc:d ~'ll lllal

~1: .w~eJ>cJ tl).cn-h) ·l>~<c titlcOI><:i.aJ >Wio:tl' . ..m• ~It' tbt- rt"ln..,~tlbitir) r.f tile Comran~·,

mJ~.Xfll 011r ,~,rlbilit) i< ~; ~\J'fe« oo opnu011 t\1! 11\1:"" t;n•n.. •"' •1:11• rnr•''' h.l'<Cd oo

wr ~Jodtl.

1\ e cvn.Juct<\'1 v<li ~td•J '" ...X..'Ifda!l« wilt: 1ada:"'~ .u~l'dJ ,awnfl~ a.:c~rce<J iltlodit.. 0..-..c

~~ft<l.,,k fftltlt£<' IIUtl '"" poo ud ~rtor,.,. !If~ ~~~ to eNII•" n:'""'!~N• •wor~ alluou

"h(lhc:r the fttUiroci.l.l '113'-lmaasArc:. (~~of 111mcri•l ola.<ta(tm~•·t . ''" ~udil tf1(fude< eu•llnJ'll:·

.m a ~~ Nio. c•~<<' ~\II)I:Ot\lt_f die iOOOCJ'h Al\•l ti~L-.w•c-. at> '''• fnal>C."'I ~tem<l\4 .\11

~~~ alo~ II'(IWc$ UR' '¥1_! tM a._(Ql~Dtln: J'OIIdpic- U>Cd ,,nJ •ljll\>r~Wt l~-:•1.11•·, ·-· I>~

.,~··•J;CJJI('t:l a< w~ll '" v::!tulin~ Jt-e o•cr.Jif (jn;q~<;tal ~·~•em<~• rl'l!.<.o:ntiiii()O We ~·~· .... lhot

O.<f' 3t•Jil (1'\"r.k-~ 1 ra." ruble bas.J, IQt !lror OCJin~l!'

A,; rt<jllmtd !lv tile CQII>•'aJI~ [Auolttor' ' Re~~o,nl/)tdo;r. 2(\(13, a> Mf<'l!ll(d by the: Co<>>p~nw.

(j\\ldot~-rs' Rcj)<)t'l j (AI\IeJ,dl!lf:lll) ()i--dcl, 200. ISSued by 111.: f CJllrttl ( ti'•,IMI<III 1\1 ln<ioa r;, lctnl$

01 sut<-scch(llrl lA}nfu :Ji!lrtln Q(tltt:: C011>p:m'•' 1\<'1, 1?.~1'1. "'< en;:ll'!l~ '" rloc: Ar.I!C.""~ a

li:!UIJ\eJll tift lilt nl~l'<'r.M.XIlJiicd m-p.)l'ap'aptu 4 •Mil \ l'fd~ ... ld cttdu

~ ~ We }l.we JJhl<l•-14-d all tile lllltull\lition ~•x1 e'.ploln~·,,,., .. ~< hoclt t(' lite tx·~t of ' ''"

~nul~lcdg~ -and ':lchti'W¢1\"ll<I:C!lery for the purpoSt ot' <M .urdl!.

b}

' •llliJ

litH I. \'ub,.'l.nal!t Kunj. >l.li.t GoJonr, M A. R 7, I'II.:USU·l.Wl~~$. 6S4!>21l flO I.C~ • .__,_, _ _ .._~ IDCl'.n,( '.$5"!.S....,.,..-62; ' talll Btdl ~.Pir(m))9191J07345

2~S.S...MnoC,~--.IIe'\.>ft!Oltt:_ I(~R<D<l 11--">•IJ-IOOI.n.cq:~JOaaSt,.l

Annexure-3

Jharkhand \spat Pvti:·

"" . ~ -otre tor

UWfVEDI GUPTA & CO. Con tinLt~Cioo Sbcet

c) Til< lll\l&n<:e Sheet and Profit & Loss Accoul\t <Jealt wo11t '" lilt· n;('<:rt ou: in

~trlitolt \\·ill\ 1111: books of. account.

olj In ou' t)rintoon. th< B~lilO<:A: Shcet1nd profit lll>d Loss 1\~tnt deah with b)• thlf rcfl<'(l

(•ll•tply w rth the Ae<:oun1ing S!V'd.•rds ref¢~ 10 in Sub-~cctl011 (3C) of S«tlon !I I

(I( til< CMlJXllllt$ Act, 1956.

c) In ~r vl)illit>O. ;md ba~d on infOrmliiiOII and CJ.p!ao~ti.-ns ~··•n hi "'· N•n~ o•l' tkr

din:~;too. are dt:Ktualirlt<l .u on ~~h 31. 2007 frM belns ~ppotntcd as di~ctOr$ ill

• terms ofdous.: {g} of s~b-scctoor. (I) ot' s:ct10<1 274 of til< C¢n>panics Act 1956.

(I 111 our·CI)'noon .\J\d It' lhe heM (I( our inform~ and llo"(conlof\i to the Ctpl~TDtltllt}

S"CJ' IO U$. the ~ accounu to;.cthcr Wolh the Si&fl<l~:m ,,,~ ..... 1\lhl r ....... ,. oltl4

41<>14 lbelton, Sl'" the in!QrrnYJion requued hy !1-...: ..:o'onpanoc> AU 14)~4\ '"the "'alllll:f

<..'> ~ :aod pr~ 1 3 tn;c; and f3ir v;.:,. in ~Of\fl.)l'llli t)' " ilh lhc -.nHnJI

pnn.:•plc$ gen<' rnll)- I>CC<!f'ltd in India.

(I) In ~ fi:lr ~It rci.J4e;._~ to t~.c 8:llJ.1.:.: S!lcd. of the SUI< or Affair; of the C<>ml)'lny

JS lt J i .03 :!007 .llld:

till fn w·far ~sit rct~1~ to the J>rutil & l.os~ Accouot. ofth.: i'Mfit of U1c <.:ompaN

for the yo;ar ended on thnt dare.

rl.ACE : KOt..KAT,\ DA1l:D.: 06.09.1007

I' or OWIVF.ON }I!PTA & C().

Annexure-3

\ at Pvt.~ L Jharkhand sp

(\ <- ~ire or

DWlVf.DI GUPTA & CO. ----------------------------------AI'I.'IEXliRF.

TOTll£ AUPITOR'S R£PORT OF' Mi!>JIIftkKiiAND lSI' AT PRIVATF.kll'>f(Tt'D

'11>< < ump.lll} hu ma~ntai~J J>f"'lt' ~<>nls 10 sf10w full p.1111t:tl';u$ incl~d1111:

qumlti~U<'t d::wls and ~iru~ti(ln ol th fhcd ~scu on th<' oos.- o( •••ubhlc

informal tOO

b The thcd OSS<"'.S have bc:tn ph)•!ica11y ve<lfied dllting the year by the tn.ar.accment and

nl) trtau:md d~cttp.l!ltiCS were ttOIICt•l l.l" s~~t·t; l'hysic.~l verillcllion.

In our •"'l••l\ln. lht COinp;Jn~ h :lllf(>l Jis~J of W.brJUtnal (tllrl of fi"lcd asse1s r!urin&

lh<' )'C':U lm<llbe SQtJii C()rlctm lt~lu~ 121' l~ ro<npar>) 11 Mt affoeted

• · The invc<\!ory of I he c.ottlpany hM been ptty,;tca!ly •etifttd during tile yeat by the

mMaJr-:tll(l)l. In our opinion ll•< frtqucncy I'! I verificariot• it reasonablt.

b In our OI"Dtc:lin nud lK'~Otding to the utli:lrm3JoCt•l Ji•l<l ot\t>'~''m ''" gh•n b) the

n\atl~n<:nt. the proceduru '"'lo ... ~d ~rt ~.:rnmab~ ~1\d tult-l)uat<' '" ,..Jabon to slllt

of t!le eum;,>any and nature Mit~ ~-

c. In <IUr opiniC'l' tile compltly I~ rn~oniAini~ pruper rcwrd>. o( ht'Cttloty • ..u c.<plalned

t¢ '"· no ma:c;ri-;11 dl$e<(:pandc~ "'-e"' nl)ticed 011 pn)'ll.;al vcrllicntl.,n or tnV<.-otory as

cornp.vtd 10 the bQ.,)k rcc:Md>.

} l11 r~1 ?f the 1-.ull..<.. =rc:d or or.~ur;d. l:tBnM or t~kw b} th: '1.<'"'114''>" tolf;om

cootp:mlt'$. 11rms or ()!bel pi!l\i<s w' e:ed tn t!tc reg'<te.r mam:aintd 111\tlu Sc:i:llon 30 I of~~

compan;e. aa. 1956.

a. n,e compatl)' b~ U!keo ~s lr<~m three pouti<>. In rcspc•• .. r tl~<· ~i<l Ilion, the

mo.><\ntum alllO~>ni ou1$1al)dina at any ~ duting •I~ year i~ lh.l<l 1l;l!9 Ia;)~. Th.:

C(•mp~ny h.rs nol.lO'lnttd any I06nt to ~ny ~uch panics.

Annexure-3

-Jharkhand I spat Pvtj d· ~

..\_' "- .Oil:

·.

(2)

1>. In our opini()tl and :JCcOTding to the. tnfmmat\on and e.xrt3f\311Cil$ gtv(o U> 1lli. o f<1<e~a!d ioa.n is int.,rest lh:e ond o11)cr terms & conditions on which tile loan; have P<:e.n t:;~ken are

nOlj>rw~u l.cit. pr<,iodtcial-t<> 1he lnt~:rffi of tho comp•ny.

c. In re~ll<=Ct of \he loo.ns tttkr.<n by !!'!~ company, the prill(:ipat ·j5 n:psy&b!e on Jemi\lld

cJ. TI~tre a~ no overdue >mountm rcspecl•ofthe loan~· taken by the compart} ,

4 II> our ()IJinion and according to the information nnd explanations jl(ver. tn us. rllrn; '"" a•l..:<ll!!liG

•m~rMI con1rol procedure$ comme~~~un~tc Witn the ~ize of the company amllbt n,&lllrJ: of il•

bl,~fness with re_gard to pur~hase of lnvMI.ory, filltd A~ art!! with regar<! ro ille sale of

gl)<)d$. During the course. or our audil. •vc ltavc 11<>t obscned any a.>n(tn~g l.ail<m: to correc~

1najor w<!a~ nc;sscs in internal cvnlfOis.

In re£pecf of Hw ecmtmcts 0( arran11,enl·cnts feferred 10 in Se"tion Jfil ol the Compani<'S'

ACU9S6:

.1. lol om opinion •nd according to tnfonnation and explan~loOM gh<en 10 us. ~~~

tranS&C!!H:'nS.<Ilild<> 111 pvrsuant~o( e<J!ll~ets or ~!T4ngem~rils. l..ils! rte-.:dtti 10 ~entered in

the reg'l';ter malr,t:\oo~d under sea ton l!l l of l.h~ ~ot>~pr.J~es Acl.. 1')$6 ba\.~ be~il so.

cnlt red .

b. In ourt>pinion, the$e tmttsqctioiiS ha~c: been m~de .aJ prices wh.t~t are reasoMblel1aving.

~gnrd to ih~ prevllillngJl>arkel prices.

6 Acco1'd.1ng ro the mformatl¢rt Gnd ex~lai'ISliQn g;,·~~ to us. tllC Cilll1PM~ htts 1101 ~cceptcd !ny

deposits from the ptiblic, Therefore ttl~ pl'll•i~JO<l of-GI~Ils.e (vi) of the Cllf'>;>atlic> ~Auditor's

Re{l(lrt} Order-. 2001 3t'fill.6t appfiuli[<t to tht!company.

7 Iii ou~ opinion me comp~~ny 1\llun ~dequate lntemAI Aud~ Systc.m tommcnsucatc: with the &ize

~tld nature oflts llllslll~s. ...

Jl We havt beero illfonned b:y Ute managemcm Uta< rm ~::r record~ IU\vt be¢11 pfi:.>4ribc\1 ml(ler

S<'Ctttlll 200 I I) fd) bf 1M Cbn•l>anlc• A~\. 1954 in re-<p<<t of thO.!lrcduot$ '""m<ltO<:tur~J h} ttic

1::0111pally.

~ Jn r~;:pecr Qf $lllllflory-dues;

OWIV~OI GUPTA & CO.

1\cCMbn!; IQ Ill~ r«~rd~ Of ·!he .:.u:npany, tile tMII'~n~• ,, ~\!llft~ll)' rcgUil\1 in .

dcposiaing wllh appmprt•tr audlf.)tttic~ undhpulc.J ~stlll<l(,V dvc• llk.lo•Jin~ I'"'' o .. '<"nl

fund,,incom" 1.41<. uk.s rax. excise duty, coss and ocher sututory dll<$ oppli.:able 1.0 il ~ .

b. Ac~t!rding 10 the infurmration & cxplllnMi<>ns giwt.n to u,, no un-dl~l)(tted xmount

p4)'t1Plk ln ! dpci:l Of l r.tontc 1/l.l;, W<:UI\1\ IM. f'dC\ Ia)(, C<USIOOll dHI)' Md CJ<Ct>C duty

•vc<e oul.\tandl•t!r a.( M JI"'M~n:h 21)()7 for • putod nf mor-e alun "' mnnrlt< from the

dlltc J.lte> l:c1:amc payable.

c Ac<'<mlrng m the recordi of the eotnpan~ there •~ no due< of salts Ia,_, ·~ t.u.

'"'t"'n> uxlw~lth tax. t'l<tose dllt~lec$$. which hxvt noc ~m dcpotil«< on aocou,.

n f ;lR}' dtl;pUll:-

10. 1iv. COOl~y tf<x:s 1!01 ~c O«UmuJ~tcd lossc.~ II thc cnd of fh< fii\Ane1~l ~Nr The

'~' Its> not •ncurttd ln)' cJsll.losses d\tttn:: I lie fin:~nct!l yc:11 eo•cred by the audit w in

the orn'"lcdi:ud)· p<eetding lia'lCial }flt .

! f h..onlt~.t: In utft::mo1!ion & C\pl~IJlHO.~S Ji•;on 10 11!> ;and on lhc basis Of our lltdtl, .-e ;m: Of

tilt ~llli<lf> !tAll '"" comp..lny has II(){ lkfau l!W on repa~mel\1 .,( dliC'' " ' a tir>ancial

tn.U.iM}c)n.cbanl: or dci'len1ure l\OI!Urs :ss at 11!;: batan<:e sttee1 d1.1c,

IZ In <>Uf opunon anJ according lo I~ aplanalioo Si,cn to u~ and based on lhc !nf~ion

uva•l.\b!e. M lo~ns and advanots bavc been £1'3111cd by th( compan)' on the basis of sewril)l

b} "'~)' of pl~c: of ~h~res. ~lltu~s and OlllCT ~o«urh ot~.

IJ . In our opinion c:ompan.y i6 ncl\ltcr a .:l\ia iund nor a nldhil mutu~l be11ctit «lC•e•) 1 fence "'

Ollr opinion Para.4(xJi•}ofthe Companies (AIIdilot~ ~cpon ) Onl.:t. 200J 1\ 1101 ~Pilheable

H A~ per tilt: I'Crotds of the company and ac<:Ordina to informalion and cxplaMttOJ\$ givc:JI to u~

M the management. eot;!)C41\Y is nnt deahng " ' 11'3din~ 111 share$, «::<:uru•n. aAd de.~nlitrcs

uKf Olher in•estt!!Ctits.

IS ~ c.o<np••n)' has gkCA .g!RraMetl for loan cal;ca b~ l)th"IS f1om ~k~ ,\cca«lint 10

'"forntottk>n and expiMatioM given ro u.s. , . ., "'" or the opini011 '"'" the term$ and cOndtticos

lhcrcoi ai'C not prima bcie pn:judic<al •) lhe imtrw o { the compao) .

Annexure-3

Jharkhand \spat Pvt.~· ~ • e •

Oire tor

OWl\"EOl GtrP'T A & CO.

16

17

(11)

Th• rornlll'll> b:u noc raim! any ttlmloan during !he yur covm:d '"" '"~WI!.

A~mdllli,t :c fnfonnation and explanations Qi•en to us. ~oil l)n overnll <:lllllninlllion of the

OD~'UICCI She~ of the Comp .. ny;\ve t(re of the opinion thM th<re are no OtnJs nsi.~ed 1'111 ~<ln ttnn bn~" that 1\ave. been used for long term investmcnl by the eomp:~ny.

I X. A$ Jle!r ro:.:ords of 1/oe comp.tny and acoordi~a 1.0 ln!l.>rm~ticl~ ao<.l t~rf4M1101l$ given tv us.

tltc ~p;mJ> .has no! made any preferentoat alloton~m •1f Ul~res to P"'''', Jull "'""P'l~'~<'>

covt!.rcd In the resister nulnuined ti~ =lion )()t of the .'let

I<) As l)(r the rcc"'-.:1~ of the company, the company has not In~ any debmtutcl>.

20. Tru, comfW!lly hasJIOI raised any mooe,- by '"1:1" of public '"""during~~ rc:r~ co..-ml by

our audit rcr;:>n

H In ••ur ()~)!noon and accordine 10 tnfonn1tion & cxplanlltl\ll) '"~" 10 "" "'' fraud on •If b,

the com~oy has !)<!en noticed or I"C90"ed durint til< ~eat CO\( ted trrolef our oudil

I'LAC£ : KOI. KATA OA T£1) : 06.09.!0117

Jharkhand \spat Pvt. tJ!..· (\_ ~ ~i~

Annexure-3

DWIV£01 GUPTA & CO. Char~eG Aet.cU!I\ai\!S

29 J, SoY• S.r.v Stteel w r~eet llof\N 7000$

P:> Nn Oll-2$5-C 1197

£mMf ~~ aov.nooco"' MIS. JHARKHANO ISPAT PRIVATE l.IMITEO BAUUICE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2007

SOUkC!iS OF FUNDS · SHAREIIOL.OER'$ FUNDS

S~l)rC CIP•tal R~e1 & &,:rptll5

OEr -l:J{f<EO TAX UAallllY

LOAN FUNDS Sfocu'"" t.oo.-. lh:sc:uie<SlDotn

APPLICA.TION OF FUNDS ; Fl)(ED ASSEYS

Gto~~ E!loc~

Lest 0ell<eGI.9UD<1 Nnt8'<>tk 0\p..lill Work o!n·progress

CURRENTS A9SUS, LOANS & ADVANCE:$.

Sche~lul•

1

2

l .. TOTAL

5

l~IOMJ 8 &.rdoy Deooors 7 Ca•'> & 83<-· Baia-.ees 8 loam&.-.,~~ 9

l. .. a: CUARENT LlA8U.JTieS ANO f'ltOIIlSION$ 10 NE:l CUAAEtiT ASSETS

MISCELLANEOUS E)(PE.NOITURE (1 o ~ e•tcl"t not wr,ne." off) Pt~-l~rn•'I;IIV lix,11en~es

Rs. R&. 31.01.1007 As at 31.03.06

2~;} 140,00000 111 670.000 00 12.'191!.79:166 <4.593.36 1 .OS 4.7 \2,.t16.00 (' 1,924050 00

218 100,422 29 2<~2.050 n3 34 IH, 54l .:134 00 7' 573.000 00

669.035.565 14 491,ll11 , 1&3 39

;;1 1 .~86260 l<~ S.3U,08119 ~411~1)34 $$ 49 5 16,232 07

4 1:t,ll82.928 OS t9S,8SSI.8SO 12 67.60a~<ltl 32M~.2228 1 500~.117&4~ 1>20 902.0 72 93

158.514,620 17 84 684.094 79 103,38:&.236,&<! 54.2S0.2?8 00

4.611,610 56 3.643,793 69 33 9:!7,&57 7l 58.352 528.~

300..C1~3z.5.30 19e 910,693 44 •32.952;8&3 75 Z29 10<1 448 S5 t67 463,"61 55 Cl O 10:1763. 12)

735228 '" I. 102114357 TOTAL

Signlllcaf!l .A"-ounting Policies · ~~S6:614 ~91 811.1&3 :19

19

NOTES ON ACCOUNTS ·~

(,( -t · ~e.M~ ~I:CT DIRECTOR

Jharkhand !spat Pvt

~ I' l-- '

Annexure-3

OWIVfDI GUPTA & CO. Clte;lloled ~nraru

.. 'I

29 ~Sow 8aur SIIHI Ill 'F'Ioo< K~Mll 70006

Ph No 033·25M1197 Elna•l st~..oOyal\00 co"'

MIS. JHARKHANO ISPA"T PfUVA TE UMITEO PAOFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THI! YEAR I!NOI!O 31ST MARCH 2007

Ita.

Particulllrs Schtdulo Year tndtd

Year t.nded 31.03.0$ 31.03.07

INCOME ~ Slfel a Oltw;V Reeclcts 11 '1!02.31:!401 25 272.44 .. ,39900 I 'IGfellaf/O«r~>ase 1n Flmshed eoo<is & .SlP 12 (7,573.881.03) 2 <t,098 133 SJ M•s.:e~s tnc:ome 13 1.83~. ,.2 23 9~.486 76

rorAL ' A' 796 47<1 668 45 :W7.5271vtll29 EXPENDITURE

R~w Male~ !ill COnsumed • 14 • I 1.306 980 54 t8fj.247.8.l5 so Manuf~tu~EJ(~ 15 ?.nGtOS07t! 56,915 403 6!> Pilyo>e<>t too&~ 101 Emr::oyees 16 8 3~31117 50 ~ 274 &.!I 00 Ad<M>Sirilllli, Selhng & i)os(tlbullOn E~peru4l$ l7 8)'1•06•2 .t820 tta3! r o"-li'CI<lt &cei'ISC$ 18 3A 493 103 12 16 t!O !5~ Oil ~6Ctall0f\ 5 4.9,095 702 '8 21.1'75.&45 7'2 Ptehrr rQtY ~, .. , "'*' 36781543 367.61543

TOTA.l. '8' 711-4,048 432.64 :HI6,01!,5()8 74

Ntl Prolil 8tfore h• IA · 8 ) 12 4:>5 e35 e• 14~5 !>105£ Les~ Flo~:..,on f<t' Ta~aooo

Cwre~~l I !>10 187 00 121,00000 Oel~ned 2 784 35700 3J5.S5800 f'nnge Bene61 Ta• 21.4 58200 220.00000

Prot.! aller faa 7.S02.709 8! 788.95255 •T ax~s IOf ... afloet y~.v-s 2 703 00 (41 ,834.001 S:r~at~ee Cau'(od to ~11Ce S~~eet 7.905,412.81 727,11 • . 5$

S1gnlfleen\ Aoe~untlng Polk:lw 19

NOTES ON ACCOUNTS : 20

A$ per our repon of ev t n date F~1 0\1/IVEOt GUPTA & CO

PLP.CE K OA TEO ~ 09 2007

Annexure-3

Jharkhand lspat Pv~ttd. - z (_ . Oir ctor

Annexure-3

OWI:VE'Dl OIJP1' A & CO Conbnuotlon Shu1

/ ~ MIS. JHARI<HAHO I SPAT J>RIVA TE UMITEO

SCHE.OUL£5 FORJ,IING PART OF THI! BALAHCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2007

SCHEDUL£ · I SHARE CAPITAL · -"iithoriMd Share CtP<Illl 15,00 00<:1 £qul!y S">>II'l: 01 Rs 100 ucni CPrev.o<!• year • $ 00 OC» E~ S"'ares)

luu.ct. Subacribtd & Paid Up : 5.00.1100 Eqtl!ly S~ate of Rs 1001· each Sl\a<tt ''ppllcatton ~

SCHEDJ.:L.E · l R~SE'RVES & SURPLUS : P~c~t & l~s AJ<: M Add T~re-d o.l!lfl911leveol

SCHEOULE·l SECURED LOAHS A· St.ate S..k ollndla, C.B.Ranelll

(SeCured by equ.tall!e ll"'())1~ of {3C10fy 181\d a eulldin~. llypoll>ee6t<>n ol Plant & MKI•Inery, hypoll>ouban of Stoek & boOI< debts o! Spen~ Iron plant jaN) IMuclion ~l.l111ace Plant at· Hesta, A·roada and itlso by the j)f)I'$OI\lll gu..-anteo of d'•ll!detS )

Term loao Worltino C..pit.al Loan

B· Punjab National Bank Wodtin1 Cal)lttt loan

!Secured cy nypollleeabOII ol Plant & M~hl!'>Vy, Stocl( & book debts of Cru5het' Plant nl ~&dha. l'lov11miJI\dl 11nd also by tne per501'\el giJ81'Mtee ol cflfer.!Ofs.) c. Equipment Financt

(~:tV "'r~lOtl ol\lel\iciW ~) HOFC 841AA

2 IC'CI Bank

SCHE0ULE · 4 UNSECUR!O LOAN

Ra. .. • •

As a1l1 .03.07

150 000,000 00

~.000.000 00 200.UO,~OO 259.140.000 00

4,593.381 06 7.90~.•12.4 1

12.4!18,793 86

17 535.450 00

t74 ,543,93<f00( 174,5oC3,i34.00

AS at31,0:UI

I 50.000.000 00

50.000.000 00 121,670,000 00 171,670 000 00

3.866,262.50 727, 1 UI.S5

4.593.381 OS

174 526.918 86 40. 4 11,204 00

26.195.674 00

230,177 30 586.~ ,,

Ul,050,7U.34

7t.sn.ooo.oo 11,473,000.00

Jharkhand !spat Pvt.f.

( f ~ -

Dire tor

[ It ~m~~~~~·- :2 $ . ..... ~ ... ~- . ""'""'~ a ~ e~~~~~~ii I~/

_,. -~

.. ! ~ ~~ i: i! ~ ~ a ~~~ ~ J 8P ~ ~ -" "\."

~~ ~ ~ ;;; '; ;;. -;:! ;1; ~ $ ~ ":: ~ ~· . a~;;~~~!~~ ;-~ ~ fi

M s~~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ... ;i ~ .~ •. ~ ~ . ~

f. $>. ,?; :l 2 8 g s tl ~ ;I So ;!~t\tl~J ~ ~~~ ! ;t& ~:~E!1~~~~~ - • lS 0. ~ .., .... I .-;:;

12 ~ l:l~;ta~~ 1 ~te ~ - "' ., 'IJ ,, ~ " ~ it i i' ·~. <IQ "' ,:, 'a /"" ~

~~~~~~ i~~~ ~ a · 'Q Jt .,. ~

!I ~t:r.~ ~ l~~i~ s <l ~ - ·r ~g - ~ ~ a ~ ~ E g ~! ~~ ~ ~ Si ~

~ ... ;l! :-~ r:.C! it: ~ ~ s s ~s• : ; ~ ~ ~ ~fi~f~~~ «\. 1!:)!~~ ~~ ..-.... ~{J ~ l q ~ .. ~ 21~ ~ ... .. "' ~ - ... - .. ! ~ \ . ' - •.

'lf s . i g

&l I " ~

~ ~

m .. ~ ,~ ..... ! ~ s~ !§ ~ !; ~

t~~ ~ll !~ 1!1

' ~ ... t;~Sl~B~~ ~*Sl · 12 ~ ~ ~Sf-i ~ ~ f~ ~ ... c;; "'t r-. ....: -:ao,. , ~·

~~ ~ ~~- ~::: fi 1: p ~ :it ~

i .. .. t . * ~ it

aj - ;,!~,~ ~~~ '! ~ . .- .dJt.. ~ 01

~-· ~$(~~ ~ ~~ ~

-I l <4 ' ~ i l .~

go

d 0:

! ! l I !t I j I .5 .. ; ~ ~ ~~ .. J lu~~:f· 'i i .. I l .: ~ l, ~ - .i I 1 i J - e ~

Annexure-3

'::\ g , ~ ~

~ m· .

~ ':: - ~ .. ;\ . ~ .

\ ~\~ i ~ l!l ..-: . ~ \ .... !i! ~

~ f t; $ ~ ~ ""

" ~ ~ ' i i ~ ~ g ~ ~ - ;<; :e ~

·"' . ,_ ' ! ;

- . I ' §, t

t s I 1;

i "

: ~ - $1 I 8

~ J ~ .. ~ I t ~

'3 • .. ~ ~ ~ ~

, 1.-- 'T fl 'l ~ ; i

1t 11 ~ Ji! ~ ~ .. § ill ~ 8: . ~ ~

~ i! ~ I ~ ,., ~ 0

~ a f ~ f "' ~ "' ..., ~

"' ·-- i-- .,.,.. .. ;1! ~ ~

I . ~

~ !:' ~ ~ s -. ~ tit e :;

~ j5

~

1 f j f ! .~ .It l! i .. ~ ~ f a ~ h 8 -.. li a ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ oe f ~ ~ $ ! at~l ~ e I>

Jharkhand \spat Pvt.t · {\ I L . -

Oirec or

OWI\/£01 GUPTA & CO

MIS. JHARKHAN'O !SPAT ..tftvATe L.-..ITEO SCI'1EDULeS FORMING .PART OF THE BALANCE SHeET AS AT 31ST MA.RCH 2007

P antc.ul.ars

SCHEDULE • $ INII£NTORIE$ : <M taMn '@illt!l a!\d cer1!fresl b'f the managemeoH R~wM.II!JI!I[~

Flt"$1\ed Goods & S!Oelt ·~ Process S~otes. Spare-s & Conwmables Goo<ls ln trar>M lrat~ & St~ S~p

SCHEDULE . 7 SUNDRY DEBTORS (Una~ul11d. conaiderwd Good) More tllal\ S.x UctltM Olllf!IS

SCHEDULE • I CasillO HllllC! (Aa~ljjlic.'d rry 11M! m~e.-nenO Bani< 8al;anus Wtth Scheduled ~nlll • 1i' Cumet\1 A.'G

FOR$

SCHEDUlE ·I LOANS I. ADVANCES

Unucured.Consider.cl good) Balaooe wttn El(el$e

9a~/1CCI W\tll Jr.atkhaoo ule~ 1 a. s~~ "4•1lr>CG lr~QQme T,u (A. '("'2006.;()7) Aav~ lr\(ll)m~t Tax {A 'f 200l·OII) l'OS & lCS ~ecetv®IO-AY, (2007..()8) T~ Am~nl Rece;v;;aelil Fn~e: 9em:(4 TlllC (A '(.2006.·07) F11nge !lentt!ll 'r3x (A Y, 2007·08} Sur>dl) JI4V:>ru 101 Cap>llll G<lQ4s ArJv:,t>ee ro Raw ~a~ s:upp~ Aavance iot i;JoenRs Other$ Ad"anc.cs & Rec;evobles Ptepaod E~nses

~.

,t,s at 3 t.03.07

101,470 502 00 24 778(i9C 00 32.252 187 31

13,2388&

tU,514.620.17

38.293.306 •04 85,088.930 40

103,382,236 ...

1 81$.33400

100!> 0 9:.8 1.790.69700 4,81t .810.56

~.884,0 18 00 401 ,068 82

1,759,934 30 •. / 11,22500

581,000.00 $8,9$200 41,\03 00

188,30000 ~.028 057 23

20.169.553 so 1.000.510 63

559,359 25 370.576 00

ll,907,657.73

At at 31.03.04

-40,016.395 2:. 32,452.575 03 1 1.061,5?4 !> I

553.!'>00 00 14,684,014.79

1539012700 38.880 149.00 54.2SO.l:76.00

I 668.918 42

148.87!> 21 1810,00000 3,623,7tl.69

9.127.92$,00 95,6':39 70

1,31.,934,30 126.225,00

4,702.00

112.200.00

6,517,7n 34 20.748,006 04

7,!.89.398 87 10,428.533.71

289.183.00

Annexure-3

Jharkhand lspat Pvt§;.

~ . (_ .

Dire or

OWIVEOIGOPTA & CO

" >~ MIS. JHAAI<HANO ls.o:lT Pfii'IIATE LIMITED

SC!iEOULES FO-tNG PART OF TH£ &AL.ANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2007 Rs. Ra.

~~u~~~~--------------------------------~As~a~t3~1~.o~J~.0~7----~A~s~a=•~l~t .~O~l.~e&~· -

SCHEOUlE • 10 CURRE!oiT UABiliTIES ANO PROVISIONS

(A) CURRE-N-T l.iAEIILITIES Su!ld!'l C~noos fQ< Capo!ilf &>ads & Supplltl•s Sur.dly C«!dotofS for e'ICI)IM~es 1\IN.a~ l1om customera Sr.l'lCIII Ow~n

Se<ur•:V~ iOS Payable Ooloet & Taxes Pavellle Ou1Sian411\Q l.:.'obllles lJ•brhtJt; for Ch"<l\i'" issuvd

(8 1 PROVISIONS • Provisions lor Taxallon; ( AV QS.07, 0>061 AY 07.Qll Pt011>W11S IC)( F 8 T (AV 07.00)

SCHEDULE- 11 SALES

Sa.rs-& ethel Rec;eiPIS Add E>-c:tse Out)l oneld E Cess & tt E <;u$

SCHI!OU!_f ·U MI$C£l LANEOUS INCOM'E MM Rec.!l;ll O;sCCUIIl reoe;vec Amou:11 wnttcn ~lc Su1'dry Da! Wloff l<lu!resl ~ Malgro Muoe'f ko..,scrap

SCHEDULE . , l INCREASEI(OECREASE) IN STOCK (FirtloMd Gc.O<M & SIPI Clo" ng SloGk O~Stocll.

42,501,886 33 9.386.301.92

72 237,414 00 !S3 750 00 ~000 00 18682900

3!!&C24()00 7~0.8a1 ()()

I 58111186 50 1ll.218.094.75

142,712,075 06 9,9!>9.9!rl 89

59.021.522 95

207.54000 574.0$.00 S97.0o41 Oil

5691 14365

121.()(.'000

1.7l4.7u.oo. ____ _;;.l4;;..;t::.::.oo=o·::ooo::..

- 717 833 191 25 !}:' 415.216 QO

802 313,407 25

573 •~32 349.59600

790.24191 121,&07 co

24,778 694 00 31.45?.~75 03 (7 .673,!81.03!

236,481.327 00 J!,&e3.072.00

2n,«<~.39900

4 8.30.00 35680.6!1

273.6SOOO 90.11~06 20,990 00

SS3 50:1.00 984,486.76

32,o&S2,57S 03 &..354,<141 50

24,091,133.53

Annexure-3

Jharkh:( ls~a~vt.,.

oirr

MIS . .JHARI(HANO IS .. A;~VAT! liMirfo SCHEDULES FOI'IM.ING PART OF THE BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MAACti 2007

R-s. Re. Paroculan

SCHEDULE ·14 RAWWilERIA.L CONSUMED .

OpenJll!li Sl~jt Of Rtf"' M<'li111>Di Add : Cotu of· Purcna,.

U,'tt!p$11ron Otco Coal ~Ill! R:J\v Ma:fm3f fi~O<>ctiO!l Fumaee)

LtU : Closi"ll Stocil

SCHEDULE · 15 M~NUFACTURING EXPENSES

P-owe/ 8: FoAl Conca~\! R•Jn'I)J'.g CMtgM Sji~i!S I c~roab!Cs

Re;~alt & A!.alntenancc S11iMy & Wagf:s (I"3ClOIY) Of~•e1 & t..ublteal\ls Cot>sumeo E)fcise OIJ!'( llleld. E Cess & H.E.Cest Llllld R.ent

SCHEDUL.E · 16 PAYMENT TOAt{O PROV-ISIONS FO~ 'EMPLOYEE Sali4ry & Ot~ Bl!llefils Ernp!Qye-r's Conltll>llffon lo P f' Canteet'l, Expmses Med!QiR~ .

Stall & L'a!>oot Welfare anu Betlefi1s

40.&16 -395 2 5

200,611 .683..54 82;.457.975.SO

L083;S 78.50 18$.087,8A9 .35

512.8!17;48254

101,470,.502.00

148.~62;233 00 3.94'3,007.00

2U1S!U3000 1.553.165 so 3,108.139 00 11.1,76,716.86

84.(75.216.00 192,800.00

272,010,!!)7.15

7 .s:TG -578 00 :?3&. ~85,00 .lt1.962 ro 11<1,72860 ltl,.l64 OQ

8,~.:U17.50

Aa .all1.03:.06

30.8&3,922 00

IJC), ?89. 764 26 59,679.171 99

979.092 50 t.53Ul60,00

229.86¢.030,75

40.6 16.395 25

s.ge:s,38.5 56

4,395. 7~e.30 1,260.168.1i8 2,519.7 10.00 4.~91,340.81

35.963,072.00 100,000,00

5,!506.245,00 f91.422.00 2~.906;00

H!5,62i.oo 181,461.00

Annexure-3

Jharkhand \spat ~v~. d.

~ . (

Dir tor

..

Annexure-3

tJif/11/EDI GOPT A&, CO

M/S, JliARKHAN01SFAT ~IV ATE UMITEO SCHEDULES FORMJNG,PAAT OF THE BALANCE SKEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2007

As. R.. A& 3131.03 07 ~!lal 31.03.06

SCHEDULE • 17 ADMIN!STRA TIVE A~D SElLING & OfSTRI8UTION EXPENSES

Otte:~'J"rt Rttl'tu.'leratton Hec:.s & Pel\o:l~$ tc:S~Ol Chll(!lOif Fell$ ar><l 1"aJ<Ct$ General E~pen&es ln5<Jrl1"-'e Ch.1ifli!'S Payments 10 Audltor,s :

AIJQol fti '• POS(II?I' & 1 ~~~m Pt~ntot>g & SllltrONL")' P!cle~ F~ Re"(

C1<Jclt<f.t,.c>'Jii1"$H RellO>I !. Mlll'llt!t'at>Ce fo;tl)llene Exp;mes Tlli\'Oib!g & Comrey:~~~ Vtl!\lclo UI)-KeeQ Con-~en: S31es El(P61)5!!$

Wa!U>!Wara Fr~tit;ht & ~nage ClcNlr;o." Poo)o~se" DuM~ Pnxno·10n Mvcutr-..-nenl \\ P~ II'JlO!<t'<ll A\1011 r .-e & EJtpe~~ses O!lml' E'~llJ!llt.sO<m~l\l Charge'

SCHEDUI.E • 18 fiNANCIAL EXPENSES

lt1U!tilel on C<1$/l C.~dd Lu'lltt lnit<1!c>l Q<l Tell'!' L~o tnl'll!eSI IO Other$ B¥11! Comml51>1011 & Ch:uges

84000000 \4-42 1 00

257 l'fll()() 87.755 00

786 1199 00

e11192oo ea. 1'$00

:>o3. a:n 50 150.000 00 m OOilW 130 7S300

!16.533 00 16 7 772 00 3 13 16J 00

I !».> 039 $4 1.9!7~ 00

' ·' ' ' 2h 00 149 &311 00

e.coo oo

198.70S 28 1!17,00000 15.000 00

4.390 00 8.3<11 ,10G.42

'80000.~ 13.54100

278.489.00 100.35100 385.721 00

39.26<1 00 73.00100

309.39500

' 99.581.00 141.671 00

4,300.00 277.84S.OO 532.~07.00

479.995 52

64.2.13200 14944.00 34,00100 15.50500

307.544 88 178,1;0000 210,879 00

.... 20.188.38

11.993 635 49 4.903.904,. I 0.003 1135 06 10.204.:Y.lS fl7

Ill ~ . 1(13 00 944<352' 18

____ 2_.•!!~~5~,----~~e~2~7~s~06~a~7~ 34,411G,103.12 16;&80.159.06

Jharknand sp I atPv~. d.

. ( L · V\... Oir ctor

OWI VEDI Gtff"TA & CO. Conu.ou.aw11 Sbeet

MIS . .ffiARKHAND lSP.(T -;JIVAT£ LIMJTBD SCHEDULE FORMJNG PART Of Jlil'IAL " CCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR £:'/Oto O"

31ST MARCWl007

scm:.oULE- 19:

J., SIGNl fiCt\"": ACCOUNTING POLtCf£S :

3~ B.tsls ol P t·•pnslfon of Flnaati•~Stotemoot !

Tht ftno.oc::tal $1llteu1ent ha1 ne<lll prepor~d under lhe hblcrlc~l cost cMventic>n. tl\

ac~ordanu with \he ll•nerall; aeceptcd ~eouotlf\1 l>ftnciplcJ 111 \l>di.'l and \he provisi\>ns

of the: Co'!';:anie's ~cl. 19S6. as adopted consislenUy by lbr COtll~bny.

b) fl'i•~d Assets and OtprcdarJon:

f_,penditu~ I'« additit.'!l. improvemtl>l ~ ren~J tof ih.(d l!«~t~ •~ Nt"tahl<d ••

COS! tm:luding fonanctal and Olhcr OO;( till the COOin>CIICemt'nt of com~rcial

pro.tU<'tioro tess CENV AT cndit O'l purd-.au of ~h osuts Expenditure f01 repeirs

and ma1nte.n.ance an: charged to rev~nuc..

l. ()q)Tcc:~alian on ftltCd asse~ is pr<n id<xl by WOV M\'lhr'<l )l t I( r.t<" and tn the

m~nnes presuibed undei Sch<odule-XIV to the Companoes Aa. 1956 No depccciation

lS pro•ided on CE.NV AT credit of F.~c.ue Duty on Purchase of U.pical Ooodt.

c) Bs1b or Mcouniing ;

All income a...-d expenditure irtnl$ -h~•in11 o mlltrial burmg on the finaneil!l sta.ltmems

lt\: r.ccogniud on acc:ru:d ~><\sis ln re!pe<:l of sales or charc:oal n hns b<:c11 Jl!COI'"rcd fr>r

on ac1ual sales basi~.

d) Tnvcnu~ries;

Raw. M~terials. SWTes & ~res Me valued al cost. Stoci. in l>;r!Ces.s are v~lucrt a1 eo$1

f!nished ~ods -aru valued at lower or coS4 or mnrlc et p<oct. By r~<xfuct Me •nlucd at net

rcal!uJ)h! value.

c) Reveuut Recoenition :

Sate• it recogniuG-~n sign11ic.a.111 ntlcs aod rew.mls of ow~rship we transfe<Ttd,

wtnch is a1 the pomt of dispatch of goocb to the c.ustomers and ulclut'.es <:lCc•s.e duty

·chctcon md is = of ~es and dt.sc:oums.

Annexure-3

Jharkhand lspat Pvt. L~d /( • L ·

Oirecto

OWJVEDI GUt'TA & CO. Conliaultmn S~c~t

fl bd~t"f)Ot)':

Ct:J•vat. CrtdtC on iJI?Ut (tl any) 11 M)U~t«l wrtll the cost of materials. Cett~t credit on

IJtJI'('h~se of c-~piut goods.ls l'f:<lo.:ed fmm the cost of st.JCIIas~ts and ;;._ lle1"«ititkn is

c\Jmged lh<rcoo.

l:lo,.owing ~ ~nril>vtablc tO atquislcfun of l'l•cd AS~;Ct$ are ll'l:lllt.d fti ~ 1>f cost of

~1cl1 MSCtS and capita lim~!. All orhq i.>-1\'tOI\ing co>ll ar-c ~~(~()J to rt:V\!111\l~

i) Tucs on l lltome:

T"ilx on income for the curJ~Ol yo;" 1~ determined on the basis ofT n.~~blc l~me and

TM Ra.t• in aocorJancc With tho ptOvisiOIIS of II'COme Tax Act, 19(\ I

r;kfared t;;,x c~p<~ ,fJ)(! tllC()o1~ >$ recogmt.cd on tlming dlff=ncc htiW•:.~n tl~t:

:Kcountiilg i~~C-Jinc ~nd ~x...bte i11coote ~the year ba$c:d on applit~blc tl!X r•tcs 1)0<1·

laws on the .B~Ltn<<' Shcel d;,te.

SCHEDUL!i: : 20

2, NOTES ON ACCOUNTS:

I, Cootlagt.nt Llabllltlt;l;

8) '

b)

c)

0) C)

Contmge!ll l\abilhit~ r\01 lltCWidtd for. i) l;:lectricit')"$ur!'lwlle

I) E.slimattW-am'Q~IJ11 of ' ooll'acts te!l\.1ttjulf{ toM c:otccutcd o'nblpit:il»CX.'!JU"I filld, ·~l pn)\•idt!d fo.r.

Clai!ll> •g~~lnS1 Jh~ WntPlfniesldiSj!!!u::d tfmilitl~ MJ

.a.cknowled~ ••tkl~

ASON ~ l t.03.CI7 31.(1,.}.96

NIL 78.2538 Nil.

NIL NIL

NIL NlL

NIL NIL

15 •. t'.O.OOO 15-.1!0,000 9<~,48,00() 1,1.8.10.000·

Annexure-3

Jharkhand !spat Pvt~. ~ l--

Dire tor

·.

DWIVEOt GUPTA & CO. Con,tlnuadoa Sloeet

A ~~-----------------------------MIS. JHA.RKHAND lSPA T PRIVAT€ LIMITI:lD

2 Dcrrecration hu not bttn chul(td on one tOO Tl'O SPOil&< plam. SiiiCt the ~me has not been put ro ll'iC for comrncrcial production. However CMI or mtt I 00 ll>O pla111 of Rs.5,12..92.??0.~4 h~s been mcludeil in 111<: (>lam and miiChiocry. Gm~ bloc~ o( }tlant mach!ncry include$ Rs.2. 78,5-9. 788.)'1 of crll$-her division at Nm·aonundr on which PNR Rarnga'h has exclusive chAt&~ 10 «<ure tho working upiw limit of rbc cru>he< dlvr~o()rl

3'.

4 .

In tht opinion of Ill<: board. the vtl~ of d>< ral~tlOfl of INM arid illdvancc.s ~rvl current

useu in rt>e otdin.try-COUI1t of the bw\~~eu will n<M be lc:s£ dtao Ole amo'JOl a1 wbic:h they .n:

<talC\! •n d>c pa~ance sbtel.

pircctors 1\3\'C foregooc their sinofli rees for the Soard mectiog~ •ttended hythcon.

o expendlttuc h:~S beect htcu rn:d on employ~$ .._.h., wco~ in r~cetpt o ( :emuncr:ulon

4j!lr<ftlli'1j! to Rs.24-.00.0001· p.a. or nton: or Rs.l.OO,OOOI· p.m. or ntore, if empl~d for a

part ofthr ~~ar

CJ.F. ,.aluc of Imports Nil

Earnings in foreign £xchan~e NIL '-II.

36.4~,44~.06 7.09.099.00

~- 1M dosct....\1"'~ "( T<M>«Iio<ls woth rewed p;utic:s . as rcquln:d by Accoontiflg, Sl.andard 18.

·~sued b) ln"llllte of ~ered t\CC<lUnlMIJ; ofln<h., lire ~ivc:n 1-ek>t• _

- f Name "f Rei.\iedi>~- l Rclallon

I t I Aklk C<)O I AgenciuLl<l A~.Jii'iecu.

Nature of ! Am®'i:ii"fifi) Ttanwction ! l'urchasc~epai" ,- I !6620.$0 & MJont<:nanct' I

'"'='-=---:--::--;-:---:~:+-:----:--::---4-;~~~t~o:.:.i.:.l.!!' ;.c.;.:._ 1 ~10000.00 2 R~;u·b Gyml;~na Club Auooa~ Co. B..smus l'mav>l101o 106QO~ 90

I (l'l Lid 1 Abluwk Run;u.

I. l R (' Rung,r, Di~or

~ ~lukR'imslll ~---..,....___,,.. ~ _Shr~OUrgLi£!~CP -~~A~S~l~~~~~~Co~-~~~~------L--

t 1 !!(~_llllS!!!,.tCf:S. 0~~ I As.:oc ate Finn •·s Alo~t ~tceb Itt~ 1'111 I ASS<JC•:a.te CCI.

r_.•d------------~·--------~--~~----------~~~~

Annexure-3

Jharkhand I spat Pvt. ~t .

~ . ~ -Dire or

Annexure-3

11). Qoatrtir:atin Detail~.

-Spo11~ J,-op O.ivbion. : ! t)nlt I 3Ul~.2007 SI.Ol-2006 I L•~eilsed- - - - -- \>'1 T. l N.A. r-r A. -

l11$m.lled- ----- M. T. l 90000 -----oo.ooo ln.!a:ctioo Fut'flac•: DMsianl

l~ ' ·-f-•---A-c.Ze'l'sec! - M.r. -l N. A.

! lnsblkd M.T. l 72000 .

""' ~c;:;;;hcr .Oh/ISion : -- ! I ~ - - - ~

' I Weeu;ed ~~ T _j_ ---~~-"'_t•:n""e_a'f':_ -_-_-_-_ -_ -::~-_-:_-_-_ -_ i.:...-:_ -_M_. r_._ J

N. l'\.

4500()0

~rONGEIHVISIOJII: Port' .......

R.-'W Op~-..,,B·~- r···r~• (:Q., •• S.a<_lf/C CIO>l'lig OpHIO hi<M C<~N.t Cl6da' MATI>RJ,\LS Stoek •d ... · plitJq , "PP1"• Stode .. , <<>! S.lu s ........ !M,T·.l t•rod. ..... .~. Stod< I' rod.

lm .. '\{)t-c. (f',J.1 .. ... ti'U ))))Olti\ ~·J'A1 •\.et-15Ut: 171~'*-' J~ta'$ ,,. JJiU(,tf/'1. 6;.~.0. c. .. l ~~40) -41"1~ J:lma.r.a 1~-"-7*') l'm~n ll*"t~} ~~.1.r$.Ta llS1lf.(0 -19li<f!':~

fj.x,m~,~e.o ~~Jl I.J.U7\U fl>< i'«J• ,q; n-• t).n~ (U~)' 'J t),i ~l l'll!:ll

I'JXI~IftO GOO II$ i 8!

w .... ,.,.,l"""' lt<l·~ S;j<1<1o,:fr"" ··~· 'l!+ti'n<H> l<i:ll'I •H <IJ..iO ilc.J..!Jl~ J"li).fq f~-~ 71,9$($

l:<!l> Or,F"!r.ICS ~}~.$ ·~~'II> U,);l·• r.; >'Hll 11!1 t); i U 1..J9t) >?U91• t4J6.J:U ~ 'I.L J\f tt Jib eSj &J. ~O.

R\l>VCnON .FIJRNAC£ 01\'JSIO~:

Vtrtit: .• dArl ~~1001 ~Oll£-06

R,.\\\ O!ttolo" 1'.01.1'(~· c~••• s ..... Clooklr o-· "''"'&.;; c ... u Ooslll& 1>1~ Tf.RJ'AU· $10<1. ,.;I m-f'l611 Sl~~ ioc n / s.. ... S!Od< {M.r .\ l'rl>l!. StMk l'rl>d

~OO'!\!t:' 'IIC JI'1 NIL ~I J!(Il!/1> l.lo1< !J>> ;...JI'' ""- *"~'" •lh l'!l

"'*r""' !IlL ~~~·<><> "''-"0 )•II.. 1<1\ 1•Jt ~1.l

:~1> !ilL 1\&l-t) l lbF..O'f') >;!l M~ ~l~ >tit.

F1SL$l!VJ> ~ODS! Br ftO<Itt<>(\J.T.I M $--adltr ·•n. lllliNl )t$ji1· 1~ 1(!00~ I'lL )JH !-llt. I'lL

., .

~ a Jhatkhand lspat Pvt.?

I( ' L -

Dire or

OWtVt:OI GtJI"T A & CO. Coolinualioa Sllett

/ ~ MJS.JR.o\RJ<HA.IIID ISrAT rRf1i'ATE UMrf£.0

C'ROSHER OIVISIOI'\ : 11)06.1007

RAW .)-1>\TEIUALS (M:'t. !

-(:':')-... -•.• ~ .. -,--:po-:.-r<ll~.-('=-.-.-,. """'i.Te· Stot~ ,t,J ••·rtlon

nx:-m:o coom' a. -t>Nl l lrot1 0rc Ske.Fillt'S

I 1. Va lue wiu del~iiJ:

~.!.

Opto· ,ttrc:hutJ C'MJ.i Clool•t I•~ P,W, SSI<• StO<lc ~~~

RAW MA'T'EIUAL SIJMMARY FOR T.HF VtAR 1006-ii? r ' VAtu€:

. ~~,

Co."'-' 'ilk• \'aht< -\ l':kl>i!li

.-, , OWI\'EI)[ Gl!PT .... & CO, f or ... ,.0 01' 8£liAl.POf'THfii04Rl)

~u.J~ DIRF.CTOR

Annexure-3

Jharkhand lspat Pvtfl . t\_ t<- "

Oire tor

�� !��"�#�� $�� %��!�� &�� '�(��%��&�)

!��(&��*��+��,�-.�/��*�0��1.(�0&��*!.��0(��&��.�&��2��/33��/3��34��0&��(�.�&��2��/33�) ��

567899:;<=�>8;?8@�AB67899:;<=CD8;?8@EFGEH@IJ<6@?8�K76B�LGE�MNEOEP�GQ�MN7R�SJT�U>HG987HG@V�B667H@<�7G�W6�R69?�G@�XYZ7[XX@?\6]76BW6;�X_X_�[�5Z�aR8;bR8@?�KZ]87�c;HD876�dHBH76?�567899:;<=�>8;?8@�e��+��fg�� *��h i+��'�(��j�i��&��&!1��g��*��&��!�g��*��k +g��*�� 4��g��*��1�(( ��g��*��&��-�g�� *��(�� -+��gf!��*��+-��k� �%!��/��g��*��&+%��fg��*��&!�-l%�-gf!��*�� k!�gf!��*��k+g �*�� !��&m� g�� **��g��*��"*��n��&! ��! �n!��e-�-!��g�� *��h�� &!+��o��e &!+��f��g�� *��hp��'��&�(��!�� !��!��"�#�� $�� %��!�� /�� !�(��k�*�� q'(� �� j� ��#�m��ijp$�� +*�� r+� *��#�m��i�s��m��i$��t�� #/��ij�$� ��4��u(�1��(� ��v��u�uwtx��u�"��"!��%&�� u�"��%&��y�� z!�-! ��&(��j��{��*��w�&��j�|��p�&��*��t��!��z!�-! ��vr��z��#�$�yq��1��!��%f�&+%�� }6]9=�7G�;6FGBB6@?87HG@Z�B8?6�H@�MM;?�B667H@<�SJT�~��x�� 1��+(�� m�+��"�+��*&��p�*+�� "��%��*�� p�*+�� &��j��&� �� &�i! -&�0�t��&�� 8778FRB6@7ZaKcd�c;6Z6@787HG@��}E]]7��nJ<6@?8�LGE�MMEOEPE]?Q��nJ@@6�:;6[>KK�aR8;bR8@?�KZ]87E?GF��n�;H6Q� ;H76:]�aR8;bR8@?�KZ]87E?GF�3�nT;6?HW96�JF7HG@�[�aR8;bR8@?�KZ]87E]?Q��n¡5d�aKcdEbB9��nLG?89�¢678H9ZE?GF��4n}6]9=�7G�}6FGBB6@?87HG@Z�GQ�MM;?�SJT�U>HG987HG@VE]?Q��3��n

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-C

1

Minutes of 36th meeting of Expert Appraisal Committee for the proposal involving violation of EIA Notification, 2006 held on 21st -22nd September, 2020 Following members were present in the meeting:

(i) Dr. Satish R Wate - Chairman

(ii) Dr. G.V. Subrahmanyam - Member

(iii) Dr. A.L. Ramanathan - Member

(iv) Shri K Gowarappan - Member

(v) Dr. Dilip S. Ramteke - Member

(vi) Dr. Poonam Kumria - Member

(vii) Dr. Bharat Jain - Member

(viii) Dr. Subrata Maity - Member

(ix) Shri Ashok Agrawal – Member

(x) Shri Anil Kumar Jha - Member

(xi) Shri Amardeep Raju - Member Secretary

Dr. Ramana Murthy could not join the meeting Day 1: 21st September, 2020 Time: 11.00 AM to 04.30 PM

36.1. Opening remarks of the Chairman 36.2. Confirmation of the minutes of the 35th meeting held on 06th – 07th August, 2020 at Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jor Bagh Road, New Delhi 36.3 Proposal for consideration 36.3.1 Expansion of Manufacturing of Bulk Drug & Intermediates (from 12.85 TPM to 34.8658 TPM) at Gut No. 204, Nashik-Mumbai Highway, Vadivarhe, Taluka Igatpuri, District Nashik, Maharashtra by M/s Vadivarhe Specialty Chemicals Ltd. –reconsideration of Environmental Clearance. [Proposal no. IA/MH/IND2/87354/2016 dated 05.10.2019] [F. No. J-11011/123/2016-IA.II(I) ]

The Project Proponent and the accredited Consultant M/s Green Circle INC, made a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and informed that: i. The proposal is for environmental clearance for the expansion of manufacturing of Bulk Drug & Intermediates (from 12.85 TPM to 34.8658 TPM)at Gut No.204, Nashik-Mumbai highway, A/P-Vadivarhe, Tal-Igatpuri, Dist- Nashik-422403 (Maharashtra), by M/s. Vadivarhe Speciality Chemicals Ltd. ii. The project proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-2) in its Meeting held during 21-24 October, 2018 & 29-31 January 2019 and recommended Terms of References (ToRs) for the Project. The ToR has been issued by Ministry vide letter No.J-11011/123/2016-IA II (I); dated 19th July 2019. Proposal for EC was submitted to the Ministry on 05.10.2019.

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-D

78

EAC in view of the R.O report recommended that instant proposal in not under violation of

EIA Notification 2006 and therefore may be referred to the Industry-I sector for further

necessary action at their end.

36.4.5. Sponge Iron Plant (4X100 TPD), Induction furnace (2×12T +1X12T), Rolling Mill (90,000 TPA) and 18 MW power plant [6 MW WHRB, 2 MW Coal char based and 10 MW Coal based] of M/s Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited located at Hesla, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand – Further consideration for Terms of Reference. [F. No. J-11011/41/2013-IA.II(I)]

Project proponent alongwith the consultant M/s Vardan Environet made the detailed presentation and submitted the following information: i. M/s Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited (JIPL) has established 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant at

Village Hesla, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand after obtaining CTE from Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board (JSPCB) on 31.07.2003. Environmental clearance for installation of the Plant, as per EIA Notification 1994, was not required as the project cost was less than 100 Crores.

ii. JIPL installed another 2 x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant (2x12 Ton Induction Furnace with Billet caster) after obtained CTE from JSPCB on 06.11.2006, which is in violation to EIA Notification issued by the Ministry on 14th September, 2006

iii. JSPCB issued Consent to Operate (CTO) for operation of all installed Units till 30.09.2012. At the time of renewal of CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013, JSPCB directed the proponent to give clarification in person to Member Secretary as to why the application for grant of CTO for 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant installed during 2006. Thereafter, JSPCB granted CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013 only for operation of 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant, installed during the year 2003.

iv. JIPL submitted application on 11.01.2013 for grant of TOR for obtaining EC vide letter no. JIPL/1124/12-13 on for 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant which are under violation and 1x12 Ton Induction Furnace, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill & 18 MW Power Plant under expansion.

v. Proposal was considered in 7th Reconstituted EAC (Ind) Meeting of MoEF&CC on 04.04.2013 and as the proposal is for violation, MoEF&CC vide letter dated 12.06.2013 directed JIPL to submit compliance as per OM dated 12/12/2012. JIPL submitted the Board Resolution and Credible action to MoEF&CC on 04.01.2014.

vi. The proposal was considered in 31st Reconstituted EAC meeting held on 08.01.2015 and again on 1st EAC Meeting held on 20.11.2015 and TOR for the project was recommended. MoEF&CC vide letter dated 08.01.2016 granted TOR.

vii. Final EIA was submitted to MoEF&CC on 25.04.2018. Public Hearing for the project was held on 06.05.2017. EDS issued by MoEF&CC on 17.01.2019 mentioned; “The proposal is involved Violation for EIA Notification, 2006. Therefore, you are requested to make application under violation after issue of such notification for dealing of violation proposals”. The proposal is delisted the proposal from Ministry’s website on 07.06.2019.

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

79

viii. JIPL requested MoEF&CC to relist the project and transfer the same to the violation committee as ‘Lateral Proposal Entry’, as per MoEF&CC OM 09/09/2019.

ix. Proposal was considered in 33rd meeting of EAC (Violation) held on 18.05.2020. Committee recommended to submit the duly signed hardcopy of the following documents: a) Revised Form-1 and PFR having details of Violation, b) Year-wise production details including total cost of the project, prior to September, 2006.

x. Duly signed by authorized person of company, hardcopy of Form-1, PFR having details of violation, Year-wise production and project cost details and other documents were submitted to MoEF&CC on 08.09.2020.

xi. The total land area of the plant is 14.38 Ha (35.54 Acres). The existing land of the plant is 25.54 Acres (10.34 Ha.). Additional 10 Acres (4.04 Ha.) is taken on 30 years lease from M/s Durga Cements Co. Ltd., Ramgarh for installation of the proposed units.

xii. No national park/wildlife sanctuary/biosphere reserve/tiger reserve/elephant reserve etc. are reported to be located in the core and buffer zone of the project. The area also does not report to form corridor for Schedule-I fauna.

xiii. Capital cost of proposed project is Rs. 186.63 crores. Cost of the non-violating units is 22.41 Crs and Violating installed Units is Rs. 31.71 Crs. Hence total cost of the project is Rs. 240.75 Cr. Proposed employment generation from the project will be 174 direct employments and approx. 250 indirect employments.

xiv. The targeted production capacity of the plant will be as follows:

Sl. No.

Units Existing Units Units under Violation

Proposed Units Total Units after Expansion





1. Sponge Iron

2x100 TPD DRI Kilns

60000 2x100 TPD DRI Kilns

60000 - - 4x100 TPD DRI Kilns

120000

2 SMS Induction

Furnace - - 2x12T 1x12T 3X12T

Billet Caster

- - 2x6/11 72000 1x 6/11 36000 3x 6/11 108000

3. Rolling Mill - - - -

300 TPD

90000 300 TPD 90000

5. Captive Power Plant

AFBC Boiler

- - - - 1 No. 12 MW 1 No. 12 MW

WHRB 4 Nos. 6 MW 4 Nos. 6 MW

xv. Total power requirement will be 18 MW. Initially power will be sourced from Grid. After commissioning of Captive Power Plant 18 MW power will be available from Power Plant.

80

xvi. The raw material requirement and fuel requirement after the project expansion are:

S.No. Item Requirement in TPA

Non-Violating Units

Violating Units Proposed Units

1. Iron Ore 102,000 102,000 - 2. Non-Coking Coal 84,000 84,000 58,750 3. Dolomite 3,000 3,000 - 5. Scrap - 15,540 6,810

The iron ore for the plant will be procured from West Singhbhum, Jharkhand &Barbil, Odisha and non-coking coal from CCL. The transportation of Ore & Coal will be done by rail up to Barkakhana Railway siding then by road. Fuel consumption will be mainly HSD.

xvii. Total water consumption for the project will be 2906 KLD (For Non-Violating units: 170KLD, For Violating units: 406 KLD, For Proposed Units: 2330 KLD) and will be sourced from Damodar River. Domestic waste-water will be treated in Septic Tank with Soak Pit and Industrial waste water generated will be treated in Neutralisation Pit and reused for slag cooling and dust separation etc.

Observations and recommendations of 31stEAC meeting held on 28th Feb, 2020 Project proponent did not attend the meeting.

Observations and recommendations of 33rd EAC meeting held on 18th -19th May 2020 Proposal was not discussed on technical aspect by the EAC as PP has not submitted the violation details in Form 1 which is mandatory and a prerequisite to appraise the project for ToR. Further, details of the projects including kml file were circulated late to the EAC members by the PP. EAC therefore deferred the project for submission of following: 1. Revised Form 1 and PFR having details of violation.

2. Year wise production details including total cost of the project,prior to September 2006.

3. Hard copies of all the documents duly signed be submitted to the Ministry.

Observations and recommendations of the EAC in the present meeting (36th) EAC after detailed presentation by the PP, observed that project proponent has installed 2 x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant, 2x12 Ton Induction Furnace with Billet caster violating the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006. The EAC, after detailed deliberations appraised the instant proposal and confirmed the case to be of violation of the EIA Notification, 2006 and recommended for issuing Standard Term of Reference, applicable to such project along with the following Specific Term of Reference for undertaking EIA and preparation of Environment Management Plan (EMP):

i. The State Government/SPCB to take action against the project proponent under the provisions of section 19 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and further no consent to operate to be issued till the project is granted EC.

81

ii. The project proponent shall be required to submit a bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan with the SPCB prior to the grant of EC. The quantum shall be recommended by the EAC and finalized by the regulatory authority. The bank guarantee shall be released after successful implementation of the EMP, followed by recommendations of the EAC and approval of the regulatory authority.

iii. Assessment of ecological damage with respect to air, water, land and other environmental attributes. The collection and analysis of data shall be done by an environmental laboratory duly notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, or an environmental laboratory accredited by NABL, or a laboratory of a Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) institution working in the field of environment.

iv. Preparation of EMP comprising remediation plan and natural and community

resource augmentation plan corresponding to the ecological damage assessed and economic benefits derived due to violation.

v. The remediation plan and the natural and community resource augmentation plan to be prepared as an independent chapter (13) in the EIA report by the accredited consultants.

vi. Budget of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan corresponding to the ecological damage shall be completed within three years and to be prepared accordingly.

vii. Economic benefit accrued during violation period with certification from concerned finance department

viii. Public Hearing (PH) has been conducted on dated 06.05.2017 and was valid at the time of earlier EAC meetings and submission of application to the Ministry, committee felt that one time PH as per the order of Hon’ble High Court of Madras has already taken care and hence repeat PH is not required, if it is conducted for the capacity for which the application for EC is referred to the violation committee.

ix. One-season fresh base line data (BLD) to be generated for preparation of EIA/EMP report. PP may use the data already collected BLD, subject to its validity of three years at the time of submission of EC application.

x. The PP should also address the all the issues raised during public hearing along with commitments made and with fund provision to address above issues in tabular form to be submitted along with EIA/EMP report.

xi. CTO conditions compliance report from concerned region office of SPCB.

xii. Detailed Risk Assessment studies with modelling to be submitted in the EIA/EMP report.

xiii. Water requirement, waste water generation, water balance and waste water treatment.

82

xiv. Traffic density study to be carried out and impact prediction modelling to be submitted in the EIA/EMP report.

xv. Layout plan earmarking space for 33% greenbelt with in Industry, around the compound wall.

xvi. Details as per Annexure XI as mentioned in the agenda shall be submitted.

xvii. Greenbelt Development & Ecology Restoration programme with Budgetary provisions (for the 1st two years) to mitigate the Predicted impacts.

36.4.6. Mining of 1003 m3/annum of Black Granite in ML Area 166.920 Ha, located at

Survey No. 917(Part) & 921(Part), village Mahimandalam, Katpadi Taluk, District Vellore, Tamil Nadu by M/s Tamil Nadu Minerals Limited - Environmental Clearance

[Proposal No. IA/TN/MIN/112499/2017] [F. No. 23-203/2018-IA.III (V) ]

Project proponent alongwith the consultant (Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd. Chennai

(NABET/EIA/1619/RA 0083 validity 29.09.2020)made the detailed presentation before the EAC

and submitted the following information:

Black Granite Quarry of M/s. Tamil Nadu Minerals Limited Located at Survey No. 917 & 921, Mahimandalam Village, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore District, Tamil nadu state. 1. Name of the project: - Mahimandalam Black Granite Quarry over an extent of 166.92.0

Ha. Production Capacity 1003 m3/Annum) of Tamil Nadu Minerals Limited

2. Name of the Company, Address Tele No. & E-mail Head of organization M/s. Tamil Nadu Minerals Limited (A Government of Tamil Nadu Undertaking) Tmt. R. Gajalakshmi I.A.S Managing Director, M/s. Tamil Nadu Minerals Limited, 31 Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 600005, Tamil Nadu E mail: [email protected] Telephone : 044 - 28524563, 044 - 28525113 Fax No. : 044-28524960 Mobile : 9488855535

3. If a Joint venture, the names & addresses of the JV partners including their share :- Nil

4. Latitude and Longitude of the project :- 13°4'53.86"N to 13° 5'27.78"N, 79°12'0.63"E to

79°13'54.09"E 5. Whether the project is in the Critically Polluted Area (CPA):- No 6. Cost of the project :- Rs. 100 Lakhs 7. Whether new or expansion project. If expansion: No (i) from ……. MT to …….. MT Existing Quarry. (ii) What is the % of expansion

�� !��"��#�$�� %�� &��"�� '�� (�)��&��'�*

"��)'��+��,��-�./�0��+�1��2/)�1'��+"/��1)��'��/�'��3�� 40��0��41'��)�/�'��3�� 40* ��

567899:;<=�>8;?8@�AB67899:;<=CD8;?8@EFGEH@IJ<6@?8�K76B�LGE�MNEOEP�GQ�MN7R�SJT�U>HG987HG@V�B667H@<�7G�W6�R69?�G@�XYZ7[XX@?\6]76BW6;�X_X_�[�5Z�aR8;bR8@?�KZ]87�c;HD876�dHBH76?�567899:;<=�>8;?8@�e��,��fg�� +��h i��(�)��4��j��'��'"2��g��+��'��"�g��+��k ,g��+�� g��+��2�)) ��g��+��'��.�g��!!��+��)�� .,��gf"��+��,.��k� �&"��0 �g��+��',&��fg��+��'"�.l&�.gf"��+�� k"�gf"��+��k,g �+�� "��'m� g�� !++��g��+��#+�� '",��n��e '",��f��g�� +��h��k�)��o��ek�)��g��+��hp��(��'��+��,�� "��"��#�$�� %�� "�� 0��2��"��&f�',&�� "��aR8;bR8@?�qH<RTG:;7�T8Z6�UYYXPX_YOV��+,�� +�� "��&�f +��!�+�,'�� 4��!�#� '� ��j�r)��stuvwxyvxvz�wy�{wy|�w}u�y|u~�wxyv�y��vxw{��v�u~��xy��wxyv�� &f��(�#�� +"�� "�." ��"�#�,��#'��$�� %��#� '� ��j��r)��,��m��"�� X�8778FRB6@7ZqH<R�TG:;7�T8Z6�aR8;bR8@?�KZ]87�UcV�d7?E]?Q��4��T��Y_EYXEX_YX�aR8;bR8@?�KZ]87�UcV�d7?EE]?Q��

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-E

11/3/21, 12:09 AM Report Part 1

environmentclearance.nic.in/auth/ECgeneral_report.aspx?pid=41165 1/9

Form-2

APPLICATION FOR PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCES.

No. Item Details

1.

Whether it is a violation case and application is beingsubmitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated14.03.2017 ?

Yes

Details of Project:Type of Appraised -1Details of Project:Type of Violation Started the work onsite without prior EC under EIA notification,2006.

Details of ViolationCompany has installed 2x100 TPD DRI Kiln and 2x12 Ton Induction Furnace afterobtaining NOC from JSPCB on 06.11.2006 and is operating the same till date,without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance as per EIA Notification 2006

Upload document of Damage Assessment Report Annexure-Damage Assessment ReportUpload document of Remediation Plan and Natural &Community augmentation plan Annexure-Remediation Plan and Natural & Community augmentation plan

Upload TOR Letter(if issued earlier)Upload EC Letter(if issued earlier)Details of Project:

(a)Name of the project(s)

Expansion of Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Productionfrom 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA RollingMill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB–6MW & AFBC–12MW at village- Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand

(b)Name of the Company / Organisation JHARKHAND ISPAT PVT LTD

(c)Registered Address Jharkhand Ispat Pvt Ltd Village: Hesla, P.O: Argada, Distt. Ramgarh,Jharkhand,,Ramgarh,Jharkhand-829122

(d)Legal Status of the Company Private(e)Joint Venture No

2.

Address for the correspondence:(a)Name of the Applicant Ram Chandra Rungta(b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) Director

(c)Address Near P.N Bank, Main Road, Ramgarh Cantt, Distt. Ramgarh,Jharkhand,,Patratu,Ramgarh,Jharkhand-829122

(d)Pin code 829122(e)E-mail [email protected](f)STD Code. 0(f)Telephone No.(g)Fax No.(h)Copy of documents in support of thecompetence/authority of the person making thisapplication to make application on behalf of the UserAgency .

Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of thecompetence/authority

3.

Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006:(a.I)Project/Activity 3(a) Metallurgical industries (ferrous & non ferrous)Minor Activity(b)Category A(c)Proposal Number IA/JH/IND/236898/2020(d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) SW/236881/2021(e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) Industrial Projects - 1(f)Project Type Fresh EC

4. Location of the Project:(a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. Khata No. – 4 & 64, Khasra / Plot No: 4, 46, 47,(b)Pincode 829122(c)Bounded Latitudes (North)FromDegree 23Minutes 64Second 99FromDegree 23Minutes 64Second 54(d)Bounded Longitudes (East)FromDegree 85

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMgDBMlSV7uto3u70UrREm7cw4HwzSt8XkTlGu3Z2w944dC3YrM8K07V2hmUjl/WqvA==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzWEg5krvYDBGh93XnKqWA8seD4MtaNw0LUiciA11QmqMQYG97XmFQhY2Rjqih8D1PE=

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMsz31AKDOHClD0ouNjJS1Io2+kptLOEL062U+xtsVbZElul1Jsuzk7xrB7I8Dp2nMA==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzWEg5krvYDBGh93XnKqWA8seD4MtaNw0LUiciA11QmqMQYG97XmFQhY2Rjqih8D1PE=

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=aXYUDadBaf44OO75ZdENfiaHZiQcET16HnSRtf6rK/kFGmOwKxFrNlIQdLz6wINPHsLdd+WHg0BemZ93uNhpC5KkR3AZivxUfeQDdRHpm2BiyKy4agYrboAtepYGnSe2OJqAcXWPZzMb2GMlNvmjwQ==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXmG8GlihX6H9UP1HygCn3p/41fTQPSrCxchmj8kKGKfA==

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-F

11/3/21, 12:09 AM Report Part 1


Minutes 46Second 09FromDegree 85Minutes 46Second 52(e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. 73E/6 & 73E/10(f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File Copy of Topo Sheet File(g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) 335

(h)Uploaded (kml) File Copy of Kml File (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundarywithin the study area 31

(j)Seismic Zone 3

5.(a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed 1(b)Main State of the project Jharkhand

Details of State(s) of the project

S.No. State Name District Name Tehsil Name Village Name

(1.) Jharkhand Ramgarh Patratu Hesla

6.

Details of Terms of Reference (ToR):(a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number J-11011/41/2013-IA.II(I)(b)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR 09 Nov 2020(c)Previous TOR Letter Copy of Previous TOR letter

7.

Details of Public Consultation:(a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? No(b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? Yes(c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officerof the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above Yes

7.1. Details of Public Hearing

S.No. Details of Advertisement Details of Public

Hearing Venue Location DetailsNo. ofPeople

Attended

IssuesRaised

Designationof Presiding

Officer

OtherDesignationof Presiding

Officer

(1.)

Date ofAdvertisement:

01 Apr 2017

Copy ofadvertisement:

Copy ofAdvertisement

Copy ofPublicHearing:

Copy ofPublicHearing

Date : 06 May2017

Distanceof PublicHearingVenuefrom theProposedProject :

4.9

PanchayatBhawan,Village &P.O Marar,RamgarhDistrict,Jharkhand

State : Jharkhand

District: Ramgarh

Tehsil: Patratu

Village: Hesla

83

IssuesraisedduringPublicHearingwereregardingtheEmploymentfor Locals,PollutionControlMeasures,MedicalFacility andsafedrinkingwater

Others AdditionalCollector

8. Details of Project Configuration/Product:

8.1. Project Configuration

S.No. Plant/Equipment/Facility Configuration Remarks

(1.) Sponge Iron Plant 4x100TPD Under Violation: 2x100TPD Non-Violating: 2x100TPD

(2.) Induction Furnace withContinuous Casting Machine 3x12Ton Under Violation: 2x12Ton Proposed: 1x12Ton

(3.) Captive Power Plant 18MW AFBC Boiler 12MW & WHRB 6MW

(4.) Rolling Mill 300TPD Proposed

8.2. Product

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=vjAtu3Zsgz31nH2YuNDR7xwq82wKwxztMH+i/TT/AfTxf2sZ/0bKapj6HbKY9Ue4u5/e9d06DdwHFUp9cel/Lg==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL62ENmUY5KDC08HB1haqKJXKAK5VWGpc3hZkilpwgu/l6g=

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/auth/Testmap1.aspx?type=sf&fname=0111202121715359KML_JIPL.kml

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/download.aspx?files=writereaddata/Form-2/GPS/0111202121715359KML_JIPL.kml

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=vjAtu3Zsgz31nH2YuNDR78AOWYZog1rF7O0WZ8kLjFL2/Whw0Kh4rRqAktaz8UBsqNI5zWm5bmh9/1IhXW2QGA==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzUI4D0y0DyH4SbeEYqwvEmbw63j4fms9Murl/YnHqFqoQ==

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=vjAtu3Zsgz31nH2YuNDR79gHUMn5EoI8mRHa9pykRt65XL8OzvVfT7QjddtolvnEi2qN2l8AemmSIMkOvgvQ7p0qtsS0WsNhG9eTo2eSbm0=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzU58BnhvJgYCZmnh7L8vuUpAjRlPQFm4dqIX0YXm9oQdIXvs4CpAbUBzBFrV7e1RFE=

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=vjAtu3Zsgz31nH2YuNDR72PXbSAolKuhO/qjYQ6dOMwQpMsdRL3aTtN3UokFeXQHNrZZ5yqN99clAGIQhADF/201UzDmHAlxKicGojFl8qY=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzU58BnhvJgYCZmnh7L8vuUpAjRlPQFm4dqIX0YXm9oQdIXvs4CpAbUBzBFrV7e1RFE=

11/3/21, 12:09 AM Report Part 1


S.No.

Product/Activity(Capacity/Area)

Quantity Unit Other Unit Mode of Transport /Transmission of Product

Other Mode ofTransport /

Transmission ofProduct

(1.) Sponge Iron 120000 Tons per Annum Conveyor Belt

(2.) MS Billets 108000 Tons per Annum Conveyor Belt

(3.) Rolled Products 90000 Tons per Annum Road

9.

In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) /Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii):

Details Not Applicable

9.1.

Details of Consent to Operate(i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? NA(ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception NA(iii)Date of Issue 10 Oct 2020(iv)Valid Upto 30 Sep 2021(v)File No. JSPCB/HO/RNC/CTO-8096413/2020/1706(vi)Application No. JSPCB/HO/RNC/CTO-8096413/2020/1706(vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date Copy of Consent to Operate

10.

Project Cost:(a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) 240.75(b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital)(in Crores) 5.701

(c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate EnvironmentResponsibility) (in Crores) 1.6019

(d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan(EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) 47.5

11. Whether project attracts the General Conditionspecified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? No

12. Whether project attract the Specific Conditionspecified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? No

13.

Raw Material / Fuel Requirement:(a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel 472750(b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel N/A(c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel 472750

13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile

S.No.

RawMaterial/ Fuel

Quantity Unit OtherUnit

Source(incase

ofImport.pleasespecifycountry

andName ofthe port

fromwhichRaw

Material/ Fuel isreceived

)

Mode ofTransport

OtherMode of

Transport

Distance ofSourcefrom

Project Site(in

Kilometres)(In case of

import,distancefrom theport fromwhich the

rawmaterial /

fuel isreceived)

Type ofLinkage

OtherType ofLinkage

UploadedCopy ofLinkage

(1.) Iron ore 204000 Tons perAnnum

Arya Iron& SteelCo. PvtLtd,Odisha

Rail 170 OpenMarket

Copy ofLinkage

(2.) Dolomite 6000 Tons perAnnum

LocalMarket Rail 50 Open

MarketCopy ofLinkage

(3.) Coal 238000 Tons perAnnum

CCL,Saunda Rail 18 Open


(4.) Scrap 24750 Tons perAnnum

LocalMarket Rail 20 Open


http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=vjAtu3Zsgz31nH2YuNDR76ehaQ3CDoUCgCbnQy/YvPERiDnq76isvuZfMX4d2ST+4kmw1Z9t0Uv0SK1ujmOxiQ==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL62ENmUY5KDC08HB1haqKJXKAK5VWGpc3hZkilpwgu/l6g=

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=vjAtu3Zsgz31nH2YuNDR7xeA9yAkeSGsUiGjvAlZs/KR0Ve/zswNgA5GYeNY5ERPghzmMVjwxCKdAG5Djm1/AQ==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL62I6BUeakiRSZ1RDw3zRMLfQ==

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=vjAtu3Zsgz31nH2YuNDR7znfB5duH7IF6krrZ9VoIiACjWJMkaF+XzIuNlxxroCJyodTPLNGeSuGPnjGF1X1tA==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL62I6BUeakiRSZ1RDw3zRMLfQ==

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=vjAtu3Zsgz31nH2YuNDR7yvtvFcOGYDLt7CjiIwQGy1G7GC8DmvkcTNfAFA2zzUYJyZXdKKDzKBw1fnRByhs6w==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL62I6BUeakiRSZ1RDw3zRMLfQ==

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=vjAtu3Zsgz31nH2YuNDR73y6Gi2VrfV3LIB1RkyJlNok3ZpQpYt3a1vgbiKX3PUpWii/jS0/o9y4M0N5oIHtpg==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL62I6BUeakiRSZ1RDw3zRMLfQ==

11/3/21, 12:09 AM Report Part 1


14.Baseline Data :(a)Period of Base Line Data Collection FROM 01 Oct 2020 To 31 Dec 2020(b)Season Post-Monsoon

14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8

S.No. Criteria Pollutants Other Criteria Pollutants Unit Maximum

ValueMinimum

Value98 Percentile

ValuePrescribedStandard

(1.) PM10Micro Gramper MeterCube

95.8 87.2 95.7 100

(2.) PM2.5Micro Gramper MeterCube

56.8 48.6 56.4 60

(3.) SO2Micro Gramper MeterCube

36.8 27.5 35.8 80

(4.) NOxMicro Gramper MeterCube

54.8 40.8 54.7 80

(5.) Others COMicro Gramper MeterCube

1.45 0.84 1.43 4

14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8

S.No.

CriteriaPollutants

OtherCriteria

Pollutants

HeavyMetal Unit Other Unit Maximum

ValueMinimum

ValueDesirable

Limit

MaximumPermissible

Limit

(1.) pH NA 7.62 7.15 6.5 8.5

(2.) TDS mg/l 489 342 500 2000

(3.) TSS mg/l 0 0 0 0

(4.) Chlorides mg/l 61 50 250 1000

(5.) TotalHardness mg/l 235.10 185 200 600

(6.) Others Zinc mg/l 1.42 0.39 5 15

(7.) Fluoride mg/l 0.38 0.22 1.0 1.5

14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 8

S.No. Criteria Pollutants Other Criteria Pollutants Unit Other Unit Maximum

ValueMinimum

Value

Classificationof inland

water body

(1.) DO mg/l 5.20 4.61 C

(2.) COD mg/l 30 24 C

(3.) pH NA 7.68 7.42 C

(4.) BOD mg/l 10 6 C

14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 8

S.No. Parameter Unit Maximum Value Minimum Value Prescribed

Standard

(1.) Leq(Day) A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) 69.9 45.1 75

(2.) Leq(Night) A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) 56.6 34.9 70

14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 8

S.No. Parameter Unit Other Unit Maximum Value Minimum Value

(1.) Electric Conductivity Millisiemens per Centimetre 0.38 0.29

(2.) pH 7.98 7.24

(3.) N(Nitrogen) Kilogram per hectare 365 272

(4.) P(Phosphorus) Kilogram per hectare 18.94 14.05

(5.) K(Potassium) Kilogram per hectare 792 342

14.6. Details of Ground Water Table:

11/3/21, 12:09 AM Report Part 1


(a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (MetersBelow Ground Level (m bgl)) From 6.23 To 7.1

(b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (MetersBelow Ground Level (m bgl)) From 3.1 To 4.3

(c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? No

15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation)

S.No. Source Source

Other

RequiredQuantity(Kilolitreper Day(Kld))

Distancefrom

Source

Copy ofPermission

fromCompetentAuthority

Mode ofTransport

OtherMode of

Transport

Method ofWater

Withdrawal

OtherMethod of

WaterWithdrawal

Letter No.Date

ofIssue

PermittedQuantity

(1.) Surface 2906 0.3Copy ofPermissionLetter

Pipeline Others Pipeline MRO/Tarifcell/JIPL/66

04 Feb2019 2955

15.1. (a)Whether Desalination is proposed No

16. Waste Water Management(During Operation)

S.No. Type/Source

Quantity ofWasteWater

Generated(Kilolitreper Day)

TreatmentCapacity(Kilolitreper Day)

TreatmentMethod

Mode ofDisposal

Other Mode ofDisposal

Quantity ofTreated Water

Used inRecycling/Reuse

(Kilolitre per Day)

Quantity ofDischarged

Water (Kilolitreper Day)

(1.)

Back washfromSofteningPlant

168 180 NeutralizationPit Others Slag cooling and

dust suppression 168 0

(2.) Cooling TowerBlow-down 80 0 None Others Slag cooling and

dust suppression 80 0

(3.) DomesticWaste water 4 4 Septic Tank Others Septic Tank 4 0

16.1.(a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) 252(b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) 0(c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) 252

17. Solid Waste Generation/Management

S.No.

Name ofWaste Item Other

Item

Quantityper

AnnumUnit

Distancefrom

Site(KM)

Mode ofTransport

Other Modeof

Transport

Mode ofDisposal

Other Mode ofDisposal

(1.)WetScrapperSludge

Others Sludge 3600 Tons 0 Others Inhouse Others reused Inhouse

(2.)Fly AshfromWHRB

Fly Ash 27500 Tons 20 Road Others Will be sold tonearby Cement Plant

(3.)BottomAsh fromAFBC

BottomAsh 10500 Tons 40 Road Others

Will be sold to thenearby Brick kilnowners

(4.) Dolochar Others Char 30000 Tons 0 ConveyorBelt Others Will be used in AFBC

Boiler

(5.) IF Slag Others Slag 16500 Tons 2 Road Others slag will be used asaggregates

(6.) Mill Scale Others Scales 600 Tons 93 Road Others Shall be given tonearby Sinter Plant

(7.) Scale Others Scales 750 Tons 93 Road Others Shall be given tonearby Sinter Plant

(8.)

SludgefromVenturiScrubber

Others Sludge 3300 Tons 93 Road Others Shall be given tonearby Sinter Plant

(9.) DedustingDust Others Dust 22080 Tons 93 Road Others Will be given to

nearby Sinter plant

(10.)Fly AshfromAFBC

Fly Ash 41500 Tons 20 Road Others Will be sold tonearby Cement Plant

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMoVkch+fC4abYNv0vaug7337hqca3dN719Ddjc3G4oGO1tKasUosuY30n4jfoieDQhiVvWcFn70b/WKbmSWhAWA=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL62ddD3VwimJSiMgzy0qCkbEJAfcVqn2Bcp1Hh2XG0PCrM=

11/3/21, 12:09 AM Report Part 1


18.

18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction

S.No.

CriteriaPollutants

OtherCriteria

PollutantsUnit Baseline

Concentration Distance GLC IncrementalConcentration Total GLC Prescribed

Standard

(1.) NOx Microgram per Meter Cube 54.80 0.2 0.12 54.92 80

(2.) PM2.5 Microgram per Meter Cube 56.50 0.2 0.28 56.78 60

(3.) SO2 Microgram per Meter Cube 36.80 0.2 0.25 37.05 80

(4.) PM10 Microgram per Meter Cube 95.80 0.2 0.71 96.51 100

18.2. Stack Details

S.No. Source Fuel Stack Height(m) Stack

Diameter(m) Pollutants Other Pollutants Emission (GLS)

(1.)

Coal Crusherand CoalHandlingPlant

- 30 0.7 PM10 0.1318

(2.) DRI Kiln 3 &4 Coal 55 1.8 PM10 0.7727

(3.) AFBC Boiler - 30 0.8 PM10 1.372

(4.)InductionFurnace 2x12T

Electricity 30 0.7 PM10 0.0445

(5.)CoolerDischarge 3&4

- 30 0.7 PM10 0.1796

(6.)InductionFurnace 1x12Ton

electricity 30 0.7 PM10 0.0445

(7.)CoolerDischarge 1&2

- 30 0.7 PM10 0.1796

(8.) ProductHouse 1&2 - 30 0.7 PM10 0.1840

(9.) DRI Kiln 1 &2 Coal 55 1.8 PM10 0.8133

(10.) Stock House - 30 0.7 PM10 0.1318

(11.) IntermediateBin 1 & 2 - 30 0.7 PM10 0.1203

19.

Power Requirement:(a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) 18000(b)Source DVC & JESB(c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement Copy of Agreement(d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) 2x500KVA, 1x320KVA, 1x750KVA(e)Stack Height (in m) 35

20.

Land Ownership Pattern:(a)Forest Land (ha.) 0(b)Private Land (ha.) 14.38(c)Government Land (ha.) 0(d)Revenue Land (ha.) 0(e)Other Land (ha.) 0 Total Land (ha.) 14.38

21. Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha:(a)Agriculture Area (ha.) 12375(b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) 2838(c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) 6215(d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) 1200(e)Settlements (ha.) 2052(f)Industrial (ha.) 154

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMuDinnxw2lqWtIADnxjTuEotL5e+wJm7lN4a/zvuYTtQ2EZNsS49xTkpu5ytAOKnvBr9yUQQCQuqrWfB1i2UAlg=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL62I6BUeakiRSZ1RDw3zRMLfQ==

11/3/21, 12:09 AM Report Part 1


(g)Forest (ha.) 5014(h)Mangroves (ha.) 0(i)Marine Area (ha.) 0(j)Others (ha.) : Mining Area, Fallow Land 5285 Total (ha.) 35133.0000

22. Land requirement for various activities

S.No.

Description of Activity /Facility / Plant / Others Others Land Requirement (ha.) Remarks

(1.) Main Plant 4.69

(2.) Green belt 9.69 Green Belt & Open Area for Garden / Fountain

Total (ha.) 14.38

23. Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-EcoSensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones :

23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity :

S.No.

Details of EcologicalSensitivity Name Distance from the Project (Km) Remarks

(1.) ESAs None 0 No ESAs within 10 km radius of Project site

(2.) ESZs None 0 No ESZs within 10 km radius of Project site

(3.) Corridors None 0 No Corridors within 10 km radius of Projectsite

(4.) NPA None 0 No NPA within 10 km radius of Project site

(5.) WLS None 0 No WLS within 10 km radius of Project site

(6.) Wildlife Corridors None 0 No Wildlife corridors within 10 km radius ofProject site

(7.) Critically Polluted Area None 0 No Critically Polluted area within 10 kmradius of Project site

23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity :

S.No.

Details of EnvironmentalSensitivity

Other Details ofEnvironmental Sensitivity Name Distance from the Project (Km) Remarks

(1.) Archaeological Sites No ArchaeologicalSites 0

No Archaeologicalsites within 10 kmradius of Project site

(2.) Defence Installations No DefenceInstallation 0

No DefenceInstallation within 10km radius of Projectsite

(3.) Others Hospitals CCL Hospital 3 NW

(4.) Forest No Forest 0No Forest within 10km radius of Projectsite

23.3.(a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authorityis required? No

(b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? No

24.Forest Land:Whether any Forest Land involved? No

25.

Tree Cutting:(a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land notInvolved) 0

(b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees Not Applicable

26.

Land Acquisition Status:(a)Acquired Land(Ha) 14.38(b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) 0(c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired 0

27. Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R):(a)No. of Villages(b)No. of Households

11/3/21, 12:09 AM Report Part 1


(c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families)(d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families)(e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs)(f)Status of R&R NA

28.

Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species:(a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? No(b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species hasbeen prepared ? No

(c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species hasbeen approved by competent authority ? No

29.

Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area:(a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area? No

(b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? No(c)Whether permission has been obtained from competentauthority ? No

30.

Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area:(a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in BufferArea ? Yes

(i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area Damodar River(ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area South(iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area 0.3

31.

Manpower Requirement:(a)Permanent Employment-During Construction 30(b)Permanent Employment-During Operation 314(c)Temporary Employment- During Construction 20(d)Temporary Employment- During Operation 30(e)No. of working days 300(f)Total Manpower 394

32.

Green Belt in Ha:(a)Total Area of Green Belt 5.76(b)Percentage of Total Project Area 40.06(c)No. of Plants to be Planted 14400(d)Funds Allocated for Plantation 4960000(e)Uploaded Green Belt plan Copy of Green Belt Plan

33. Project Benefits

S.No. Type of Project Benefits Details of Project Benefits

(1.) Social

The proposed project will have a positive effect and enhance the growth of theregion and positive impact on the supporting infrastructure. The industry willprovide employment to the locals and likely to improve the socio-economic statusof the area. There will be growth of supply and extractive industries

34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable

35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE

35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 1

S.No. Item Details

S.No. Item Details

36. Details of Court Cases:(a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against theproject and/or land in which the project is proposed to beset up ?

Yes

(b)Name of the Court High Courts(c)Name of the Sub Court Jharkhand(d)Case No. Case no. 255/2021

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMnsnPsHsya4oDX1XZLnzEjRQab2w9X9T/7zQfePPNmXAODBsQbpZIqE/WksP+QdNLA==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL620kNhBAPVxHF2qRISlz98ReyZ3ioYY0NhVYDbHCYZAHg=

11/3/21, 12:09 AM Report Part 1


(e)Orders/Directions of the court ,if any and its relevancewith the proposed project

Case has been filed against Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. L

(f)Case Details case has been filed(g)Uploaded Court Order Copy of Court Order

37.

Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water(Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act:(a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/AirAct/Water Act ? Yes

(b)Details of Direction Issued Under Environment(Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution))Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act

Case no. 255/2021 dated 25.03.2021 has been filed against Jharkhand Ispat Pvt.Ltd at Mauza-Hesla, PS Ramgarh, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand in the Court ofChief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh for the offence committed u/s 15 ofEnvironment (Protection) Act, 1986 cognizance u/s 19 of Environment (Protection)Act, 1986.

(c)Uploaded Copy of Direction Issued Under Environment(Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution))Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act

Copy of Direction Issued

(d)Compliance status of the directions Hearing is awaited due to ongoing Covid-19 Pandemi

38.

Details of EIA Consultant:(a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? Yes(i)Accreditation No. NABET/EIA/1922/RA0166(ii)Name of the EIA Consultant Vardan Environet(iii)Address Plot 82A, IMT Manesar, Sector-5(iv)Mobile No. 9953147268(v)Landline No. 0124429103(vi)Email Id [email protected](vii)Category of Accreditation A(viii)Sector of Accreditation Industrial Projects - 1(ix)Validity of Accreditation 06 Nov 2022(x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified byQCI/NABET Copy of Certificate of Accreditation

39.

Documents to be Attached:

(a)Uploaded Copy of EIA/EMP ReportCopy of EIA/EMPCopy of EIA/EMP(Annexures)Copy of EIA/EMP(Plans/Figures)

(b)Uploaded Copy of Risk Assessment Report Copy of Risk Assessment(c)Uploaded Copy of Feasibility Report/ Detailed ProjectReport(DPR) /Detailed Engineering Report /DetailedConceptual Plan /Approved Mining Plan

Copy of Feasibility Report/ Detailed Project Report(DPR) /Detailed EngineeringReport /Detailed Conceptual Plan /Approved Mining Plan

(d)Uploaded Copy of Final Layout Plan Copy of Final Layout Plan(e)Uploaded Cover Letter Copy of Cover Letter(f)Uploaded Copy of documents in support of thecompetence/authority of the person making this applicationto make application on behalf of the User Agency

Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person makingthis application to make application on behalf of the User Agency

(g)Uploaded Additional File Copy of Additional File(h)Uploaded Proposal Presentation (To be given in EACmeeting) Copy of Uploaded Proposal Presentation

Essential Detail Sought : NIL

Additional Detail Sought : NIL

UndertakingI hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of myknowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, theproject will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, Ihereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up.

Name of Applicant Ram Chandra RungtaDesignation DirectorName of Company (Applicant Name should not begiven here) JHARKHAND ISPAT PVT LTD

Address Jharkhand Ispat Pvt Ltd Village: Hesla, P.O: Argada, Distt. Ramgarh, Jharkhand

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMuV/6UD6lAeeqNK4zOoWU7mY34af+8Q6pgW7ULP4jT8jxXKmr+QoOsIAboKhOuuGe03FviQcd2BDUOv65mcwXyo=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL620kNhBAPVxHF2qRISlz98ReyZ3ioYY0NhVYDbHCYZAHg=

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMv+QFgh1LfblixguBCSCv5u0DIr60DQAFtOBJEI4s2V35UPYORmkirBu/5DPbVAwIMLw6DIUwmlzMLWminonai8=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL620kNhBAPVxHF2qRISlz98ReyZ3ioYY0NhVYDbHCYZAHg=

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMg7EPWysor5P0KirdHuZ5iCp4f8C6WONF81xFa6N19VGgyCKz7SnKypQG/6AKNnDDg==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXNvGkdT0PfxJ9apij6yL620kNhBAPVxHF2qRISlz98ReyZ3ioYY0NhVYDbHCYZAHg=

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMh8fVTCA7l2Q3tGUsWrrFjSmMaKFJoKdU0WjNk8PLeXOUCjWey0YkuSE8TySMY5lzk551dmfYDzM1blEUjDiPjc=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzUeqEISsDpNmaozay3MPM7v

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMq+mh61gJqGJCVluiyBPKt9xTZpQj8dEEdxD7TkkqDp9zqYZg0s9CKJSWDBn4HPEph/YIPOtGftPK6yPxn1pmRs0UepfQF7CEAueQ8gnAKhj1zPOalQ1lMTegQOXPV8/Nw==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzUeqEISsDpNmaozay3MPM7v

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=rXDkHPJiPmLr4h4l/LcGMpvjw+AcoTTnAsWkEtnEi243JtS5YlYlO5QHApLJJvrkjFTUNkklt2qJq3EqaUtnv0G4Fc2ZCN+jcmYsEMVLGF7DkzPSLrs9QR1Ml5Mx/NU6&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzUeqEISsDpNmaozay3MPM7v

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=aXYUDadBaf44OO75ZdENfn2/hSCk4LbN20UfnOcCsE4O0CtHeQ+iQPqHujs0bWke9kjw7ODcPzJmwPU+TOYmBYt/Po70rnT+YjxVJOFmBnM=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXKUKNiYED19hF6l1JsjsB/5dvgiqKqMhxiRaJ4LDlmYKePH7vlqdxpbU7f9F+vYSM=

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=aXYUDadBaf44OO75ZdENfpgb+V+5FNFQHIhYyimvLlJup0jeBjakvD5lzNFJ1Y/YSWsrgMQnkmYEUXaoektXPQigE84c/zZCga2XzWyZlIQ=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzWF1OLE6RXe5MiAhSH8vdQ1

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=aXYUDadBaf44OO75ZdENfiWN/vR7CccX24jtBULvxlZC4teinhAgfENYs9Ku6lQqV5xmCZ0Tcw/aBZt97x1sMT9V6rkD/Ptx2NtbzTKM7C8=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzWF1OLE6RXe5MiAhSH8vdQ1

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=aXYUDadBaf44OO75ZdENfjuvIygNjJr59qU7Qj8+sYdNR4pPtb3cYLLEZnxURchi4hHVHMh2OGZGRKiabf082eH0c5kjIeRb908dqnE0fURpTAYYdaVQb5I2SIM2A4Rp&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXKUKNiYED19hF6l1JsjsB/b6J7ZR0UGxec5pPkeNg5uw==

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=aXYUDadBaf44OO75ZdENfiaHZiQcET16HnSRtf6rK/kFGmOwKxFrNlIQdLz6wINPHsLdd+WHg0BemZ93uNhpC5KkR3AZivxUfeQDdRHpm2BiyKy4agYrboAtepYGnSe2OJqAcXWPZzMb2GMlNvmjwQ==&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXKUKNiYED19hF6l1JsjsB/b6J7ZR0UGxec5pPkeNg5uw==

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=aXYUDadBaf44OO75ZdENfjLgiJ2t7yqI9aJLyfgxN/sERuUMSdeasWTzklw3NTOpisnaNAigF3s6mJG+6TlxrX9b39QEjzhVileHCEhKwUM=&FilePath=93ZZBm8LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXKUKNiYED19hF6l1JsjsB/b6J7ZR0UGxec5pPkeNg5uw==

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/presentation/03112021g30ivahjjfp18265942JIPLPPT.pptx

Environment Impact Assessment/EMP-FINAL REPORT Chapter-2 Project Description

M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (JIPL) at village - Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand Proposal: Expansion of Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB – 6 MW & AFBC – 12 MW

Document No. 2020_VI_009_FINAL EIA M/s VARDAN ENVIRONET, Plot No. 82A, Sec-5, IMT Manesar, Gurugram, Haryana-122052

Page | 25

Installation of 300 TPD Rolling Mill for direct rolling of MS Billets to produce 90,000

TPA Rolled products (TMT Bar).

Additionally, Captive Power Plant of capacity 18MW by installation of 4 nos. of WHRB

to utilize sensible Heat from Sponge Iron DRI Kiln Waste Gases and 1 no. of AFBC

Boiler for utilizing char produced as solid waste from Sponge Iron Production Process

producing 6 MW and 12 MW power, respectively.

2.6.2 Process Description

2.6.2.1 Sponge Iron

Sponge iron or DRI (direct reduced iron) is the product obtained from direct reduction of

iron ore. Reduction causes elimination of oxygen leaving behind a honeycomb like

porous structure which is “Spongy” in nature. Hence, it was given name as ‘Sponge Iron’.

Sponge Iron or Direct Reduced Iron, DRI as it is popularly known, is a high ferrous

content charge material and is used as a substitute for steel scrap as the primary raw

material in the Induction Furnace, during the process of manufacture of steel.

There are two well-established processes for the manufacture of sponge iron, namely:

(a) The reformed natural gas process i.e. by the gaseous reduction of the iron ore.

(b) Coal based Rotary Kiln process- Solid reduction.

DRI or Sponge Iron process can use either gas or coal as a reducing agent. Since, in India

availability of gas is limited, coal based DRI are predominant.

Proven technology of Coal based Rotary Kiln process comprises of the following major

facilities:

Raw Material Handling System

Raw Material Feed System

Main Processing System – Kiln

Cooling System

Product Separation System

Waste Gas Cleaning System

Plant De dusting

Four numbers of 100 TPD each rotary kiln is producing 120,000 MT of sponge iron

annually considering 300 working days. The raw materials required for sponge iron

production are high grade ores, non-coking coal and dolomite. The annual requirement

of raw material for the production of 120,000 MT of sponge iron is as below. Sponge

iron is presently being used in Steel melting Shop for production of Billets and rest sold.

However, after the proposed expansion complete sponge iron produced in the plant will

be used in the steel melting shop.

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-G

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Environment Impact Assessment/EMP-FINAL REPORT Chapter-2 Project Description

M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (JIPL) at village - Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand Proposal: Expansion of Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB – 6 MW & AFBC – 12 MW


Page | 28

2.6.2.2 Steel Melting Shop

I. Induction Furnace (Under Violation 2x12 Ton, Proposed 1x12 Ton)

Induction Furnace is basically furnaces meant for use of Sponge Iron as major raw

material to produce mild steel. These furnaces work on the principal of electromagnetic

induction. After the furnace is switched on, current start flowing at a high rate and

comparatively low voltage through the induction coil of the furnace, producing an

induced magnetic field inside the central space of the coils where the crucible is located.

The induced magnetic field thus generated cut through the packed charge in the

crucible. As the magnetic flux cut through the scrap/pig iron and complete the circuit,

they generate an induced current in the scrap. The induced current as it flows the highly

resistive path of scrap mix, generate tremendous amount of heat and melting the scrap.

When these additives have melted completely, the power input may be increased to

bring the temperature of metal up to the point most desirable for pouring. The current

is then turned off and the furnace is tilted for pouring into the ladle. As soon as pouring

has ceased, the crucible is cleaned completely from any slag or metal droplets adhering

to the wall of the crucible and the furnace is now ready for charging again. An induction

crucible furnace differs from arc furnace in the ways, which are important

metallurgically, though both types of furnaces are used for making steel from scrap and

alloys. Induction furnace do possess the following characteristics:

High relatively, narrow melting vessel

Low Crucible wall thickness

Relatively small area of metal in contact with slag

Low slag temperature

No carburizing during melting down

Powerful bath motion

Two nos. 12T induction furnaces (each with two crucibles and a common power supply)

are in operation through which production of 72000 TPA MS Billets is done. Additional

1x12Ton Induction Furnace is proposed for increasing the MS Billet production by 36000

TPA.

Table: Product Details of Induction Furnace

Parameters

Production from 2x12 T

Induction Furnace under

Violation

Production from 1x12 T

Induction Furnace

Proposed

Production of MS Billets (98% Yield) 72,000 36,000

Production of liquid steel (Tons/yr.) 73,500 36,750

Operating days 300 300

Tap-to-tap time, min 120-130 120-130

No. of Heats (per day) 20 ˜ 21 10 ˜ 11

Furnace capacity (Tons)

2x12 1x12

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

Environment Impact Assessment/EMP-FINAL REPORT Chapter-11 Summary and Conclusions

M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (JIPL) at village - Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand Proposal- Expansion of Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB – 6 MW & AFBC – 12 MW)


Page | 248

The present proposal is for;

Installation of new 1x12 Ton Induction Furnace with 1strand 6/11m of Billet Caster

for production of 36,000 TPA Billets

Installation of 300 TPD Rolling Mill for direct rolling of MS Billets to produce 90,000

TPA Rolled products (TMT Bar).

Additionally, Captive Power Plant of capacity 18MW by installation of 4 nos of

WHRB to utilize sensible Heat from Sponge Iron DRI Kiln Waste Gases and 1 no. of

AFBC Boiler for utilizing char produced as solid waste from Sponge Iron Production

Process producing 6MW and 12 MW power respectively

11.2.2.2 Process Description

I. Sponge Iron

Sponge Iron or Direct Reduced Iron, DRI as it is popularly known, is a high ferrous

content charge material and is used as a substitute for steel scrap as the primary raw

material in the Induction Furnace, during the process of manufacture of steel.

DRI or Sponge Iron process can use either gas or coal as a reducing agent. Since, in

India availability of gas is limited, coal based DRI are predominant. Proven technology

of Coal based Rotary Kiln process comprises of the following major facilities:

Raw Material Handling System

Raw Material Feed System

Main Processing System – Kiln

Cooling System

Product Separation System

Waste Gas Cleaning System

Plant De dusting

Four numbers of 100 TPD each rotary kiln is producing 120,000 metric tons of sponge

iron annually considering 300 working days. The raw materials required for sponge

iron production are high grade ores, non-coking coal and dolomite. Sponge iron is

presently being used in Steel melting Shop for production of Billets and rest sold.

However, after the proposed expansion major portion of sponge iron produced in the

plant will be used in the Steel Melting Shop and rest will be sold in the market.

II. Steel Melting Shop

Induction Furnace is basically furnaces meant for use of Sponge Iron as major raw

material to produce mild steel. These furnaces work on the principal of

electromagnetic induction. Induction furnace do possess the following characteristics:

High relatively, narrow melting vessel

Low Crucible wall thickness

Relatively small area of metal in contact with slag

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

Environment Impact Assessment/EMP-FINAL REPORT Chapter-11 Summary and Conclusions

M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (JIPL) at village - Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand Proposal- Expansion of Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB – 6 MW & AFBC – 12 MW)


Page | 249

Low slag temperature

No carburizing during melting down

Powerful bath motion

Two nos. 12 Ton induction furnaces (each with two crucibles and a common power

supply) are in operation through which production of 72000 TPA MS Billets is done.

Additional 1x12Ton Induction Furnace is proposed for enhancing the MS Billet

production from 72,000 to 108,000 TPA.

The ladle containing liquid steel is placed on the turret and brought over the tundish.

The tundish act as a buffer and enable the liquid steel to move homogeneously down

through nozzles, provided at the bottom of the tundish into moulds. The subsequent

primary and secondary cooling transform the liquid steel into billets of the required

dimensions and is drawn out with the help of a withdrawal and straightener unit and

cut into required length by the shear provided in each strand. The existing continuous

casters 2x6/11m are capable of serving the three induction furnaces. However, for

ensuring uninterrupted operations and to improve productivity of the shop, one

additional 6/11m Billet Caster is proposed.

III. Rolling Mill

It is envisaged that hot billets coming out from billet caster at 950-10000C will be

directly rolled without re-heating. Production of Billets from the proposed plant will be

108,000 TPA. Out of this approx. 91,800 TPA Billets will be fed to the proposed Rolling

Mill of 300TPD for production of 90,000TPA TMT Bars and rest will be sold in the

market. The proposed mill is a 12-stand cross country type mill to roll plain and ribbed

bars. The mill will be designed to roll at a maximum finishing speed of about 20 m per

second.

IV. Captive Power Plant

Total power generation for the proposed power plant is 18 MW using Steam Turbine

Generator set. Production of steam required for power generation is proposed from

installation of four (4) nos. of Waste Heat Recovery Boilers and AFBC type boiler.

a) Waste Heat Recovery Boilers (WHRB) for Sponge Iron Kilns

Each Kiln has a Waste Gas Volume of 22,000 Nm3 to 25,000Nm3 discharged at 9000C to

9500C (9500C maximum). It is possible to utilize the heat of waste gases by installing a

Waste Heat Recovery Boilers (WHRB) for each Kiln. The well tried out configuration for

WHRB is comprised of an Evaporator, Super-heater in two (2) sections and an

Economizer which will bring down the temperature of gases from 900-9500C to 1800C

and produce 9 to 10TPH Steam at a pressure of 66 Ata and 4900C. Proposed Waste Heat

Recovery Boilers will be capable of producing 9-10T/h of steam each from the hot flue

gases produced from existing 4x100Ton DRI Rotary Kilns. Power generation from WHRB

will be 6MW.

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

Environment Impact Assessment/EMP-

FINAL REPORT Chapter-13

Assessment Of The Ecological Damage, Remediation Plan And Natural And Community Resource Augmentation Plan

M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (JIPL) at village - Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand Proposal- Expansion of Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB–6MW & AFBC–12MW

Document No. 2020_VI_009_FINAL EIA M/s VARDAN ENVIRONET, Plot No. 82A, Sec-5, IMT Manesar, Gurugram, Haryana- 122052

Page | 281

Community resource augmentation plan (NCRAP) is required to pay for the ecological

damage as well as economic benefits derived at the cost of the environment and the

local community. Both of these, with respect to violation units, have been elaborated in

the subsequent sections.

As per the ToR, the following studies were carried out with respect to the violation

activities within the premises of M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt Ltd.

Ecological/environmental damage assessment

Remediation plan

The natural and community resource augmentation plan

Violation Details

JIPL has installed 2x100 TPD DRI Kilns and 2x12 T Induction furnace along with 2 strand

of 6/11m billet caster in the year 2006 without obtaining prior environmental clearance

as per EIA Notification, 2006. Installation was done based on ‘Consent to Establish’

obtained from Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board (JSPCB) and operation after

obtaining ‘Consent to Operate’, valid till December, 2011. However, at the time of

renewal of CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013, JSPCB vide Consent order No.

D-5045 dated 10/12/2012, directed the proponent to stop operation of the 2x100 TPD

Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant installed during 2006 till Environmental

Clearance is obtained. JSPCB also informed that CTO for 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant

and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant will be granted only after obtaining EC from MoEFCC.

Accordingly, the proposal was submitted at MoEFCC on 03.06.2021 for obtaining EC

under violation.

13.3 ECONOMIC BENEFIT DERIVED

Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd has been in operation since 2003. The violation units (2x100

TPD DRI Kilns, 2x12T Induction furnaces with 2 strand 6/11m billet casters) were

installed in the year 2006 and production from DRI unit started on 2012 and Billet

production started on 2006 and is continued till date. The Violation units are still in

operation as per the High court stay order [W.P.(C) No. 1125 of 2014] dated 24.03.2014

on Clause No. 27 of CTO dated 10/12/2012. Due to the production of violation units

(2x100 TPD DRI Kilns and 240 MT Billet Casters) the industry has gained a profit of

approximately Rs. 104,347,553 (Table 13.1). As a part of damage assessment, three

percent (3%) of economic profit derived from production of violation units shall be

added to Damage Assessment cost. Accordingly, a sum of Rs.3,130,427 (3% of profit

earned) will be added to Damage assessment cost.

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

�� !�"� �#$��%��&�� '�� (��)#�%��$�)��*� ��+

��,$��-��#��.�*/�0��1�2-�3��4/,�3$��-�/��3,��$��/�$��52��61�2�(��10�(0��(�3$��,�/�$��52��61�2�(��+ ��

789:;;<=>?�@:=A:B�CD89:;;<=>?EF:=A:BGHIGJBKL>8BA:�M98D�NIG�OPGQ�IR�OP9S�TULV�WMBA<X9=?YQZ�D889JB>�9I�[8�S8;A�IB�Q\9S�]<;?_P_Q�Y�7X�]S:=aS:BA�MXb:9�cF9�d9A�789:;;<=>?�@:=A:B�e��#��%f�� -��g h#��)#��1��(�(��i�h�� --f�� $# ��f �-�� - , ��%f�� -�� *�j-,,��f��-��-��-,,��f��-��$��$� ��6�f��-��k*�$�4 f��-��k$4� ��-�f��-��$��f��-��#,��%f��-��,$�2f��-��-$��f%��-��$*$� ��-�f��-��,�-� �� 1�f��-��$��k� f��-��*�%��f%��-�� $# ��2f��-��-,,��f��-��!-��k�,��l��ek�,��f��-��g�� $�#��m��e $�#��%��f�� -��g�$�,�� !�"� �#$��%��&�� '�� (��6��,��k�-�� n�o, $�� )��*� ��$,��i��l�� -�� p,� �� i��#-�� 1��hi��q��i��#-�� hi��0��hi�� 4��r�!,��i�4��i� ��"rs qt1�r�3��uq!t��r��s�$��i�v�� w�$��-��)��*� ��xv �� i��,�$��)s��w��0��u��)��2��"�&yn��4��'%�$#'�� z�l�u�� ,�� 4�� o#��$��!�i��$� �� u�� 4�� o#��$��w��$� ��q��r��#,��z� ��%�� -�� ,�� o#��$�� ,�� z�l�u��h�� -#�� $�"�!�iih��u�� 4�� o#��$��w��$� ��q��r��#,&��-�� X<[X8{<8B9�D:J;�h� *$�3� ��$w#$�% ��i�$��2�(�1��444�� -�� |�:99:HSD8B9XUML]McdGbAR�601(zLBB8}<=8~]McdGbAR��(0z�7d~]McdGaD;��z

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-H

�� !��"#�$��%��&��'��("�$��#�(�)��*

��+#��,��"��-�).�/��0�1,�2��3.+�2#�,�.��2+��#��.�#��41��'55'5�'5'��/��5�662#��+�.�#��41��'55'5�'* ��

789:;;<=>?�@:=A:B�CD89:;;<=>?EF:=A:BGHIGJBKL>8BA:�M98D�NIG�OPGQ�IR�OP9S�TULV�WMBA<X9=?YQZ�D889JB>�9I�[8�S8;A�IB�Q\9S�]<;?_P_Q�Y�7X�]S:=aS:BA�MXb:9�cF9�d9A�789:;;<=>?�@:=A:B�e��"�$f��,��g h"��("��0��'�'1�i�h��,,f��#"��f��,��,�+��$f��,��)�j,++�f��,��,��,++�f��,��#��#��5�f��,��k)�#�3�f��,��k#3��,�f��,��#��f��,��"+��$f��,��+#�1f��,��,#��f$��,��#)#��,�f��,��+�,��0�f��,��#�k��f��,��)�$��f$��,��#"��1f��,��,++�f��,�� ,��k�+��l��ek�+��f��,��g��#�"��m��e�#�"��$��f��,��gn��o��p��#+�,��)��$��,�� iih��q��p��"+��r��3��s"�#��#��+�k�,��(�)��#+��i��l��!��(t��n��6/��%�h��)#�2��#n"#�$��i#�uv"��s��wO�:99:HSD8B9Xx=J8R�y=J98�zb{]McdGAIH|��/}UV�cc~{]McdGbb9|�501�}�I=DY_{]McdGbAR�'/�6}NIA:;��89:J;X{]McdGAIH|��5}

�� !��"#�$��%��&��'��("�$��#�(�)��*

��+#��,��"��-�).�/��0�1,�2��3.+�2#�,�.��2+��#��.�#��41��5�5��/�/'0660��0�2#��+�.�#��41��5�5��* ��

789:;;<=>?�@:=A:B�CD89:;;<=>?EF:=A:BGHIGJBKL>8BA:�M98D�NIG�OPGQ�IR�OP9S�TULV�WMBA<X9=?YQZ�D889JB>�9I�[8�S8;A�IB�Q\9S�]<;?_P_Q�Y�7X�]S:=aS:BA�MXb:9�cF9�d9A�789:;;<=>?�@:=A:B�e��"�$f��,��g h��("��/��'��i�j��,,f��#"��f��,��,�+��$f��,��)�k,++�f��,��,��,++�f��,��#��#��6�f��,��l)�#�3�f��,��l#3��,�f��,��#��f��,��"+��$f��,��+#�1f��,��,#��f$��,��#)#��,�f��,��+�,��0�f��,��#�l��f��,��)�$��f$��,��#"��1f��,��,++�f��,��3++��e��3++��f��,��g��m �n��imopq��e��+�"�3�f��g ,��l�+��p��el�+��f��,��g��#�"��r��e�#�"��$��f��,��g��s�#��s��e)�)��f��,��g��#+�,��t�q��,��"��0�6��$�"�,��#�u"��$��+��#��,��"+��+�#��"+��&��3��"+��(�)��#+��i��p��+�+�#��#�&��,��#��,��,��'�6��vw"��x��y_�:99:HSD8B9Xz=J8R{|=J98Y<b{]Mcd{P}GP~G_P_QGAIH��''sUV�cc�{]McdGbb9��6'��s

Expansion of Jharkhand Ispat Pvt Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB–6MW & AFBC–12MW at village- Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand

MoEF&CCF.No. - J-11011/41/2013-IA. II (I)

1. M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt Ltd. has made an online application vide proposal no.

IA/JH/IND/212892/2020 dated 03/06/2021 along with copy of EIA/EMP report and

Form – 2 seeking Environment Clearance (EC) under the provisions of the EIA

Notification, 2006 for the project mentioned above. The proposed project activity is

listed at schedule no. 3(a) Metallurgical industries (ferrous &non-ferrous) under

Category “A” of the schedule of the EIA Notification, 2006 and attracts provisions of

S.O. 804 (E) issued by MoEF&CC dated 14.03.2017 for the projects under Violation.

2. The detail of the ToR is furnished as below:

Date of application Consideration Details Date of accord

JIPL vide letter no. JIPL/1236/2019-20 dated 27/11/2019 requested MoEF&CC to transfer the proposal made in EAC (Industry-1) to violation committee as ‘Lateral Proposal Entry’ as per MoEF&CC OM 09/09/2019.

36thmeeting of EAC (Violation) held on 21.09.2020

Terms of Reference

09.11.2020

vide F.No.

J-11011/41/2013-IA-II(I)

3. The project of M/s Jharkhand IspatPvt. Ltd.located in HeslaVillage, P.O. - Argada,

Ramgarh District, Jharkhand State is for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production

from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill

along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB–6MW & AFBC–12MW).

4. Chronology of the Project:

I. M/s Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited (JIPL) has established 2x100 TPD Sponge

Iron Plant at Village Hesla, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand after

obtaining CTE from Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board (JSPCB) on

31.07.2003. Environmental clearance for installation of the Plant, as per EIA

Notification 1994, was not required as the project cost was less than 100

Crores.

II. JIPL installed another 2 x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet

Plant (2x12 Ton Induction Furnace with Billet caster) after obtained CTE from

JSPCB on 06.11.2006

III. JSPCB issued Consent to Operate (CTO) for operation of all installed Units till

30.09.2012. At the time of renewal of CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to

30.09.2013, JSPCB directed the proponent to stop operation of the 2x100 TPD

Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant installed during 2006 till

Environmental Clearance is obtained. JSPCB granted CTO for the period

01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013 only for operation of 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant,

installed during the year 2003.

IV. JIPL submitted application on 11.01.2013 for grant of TOR for obtaining EC

vide letter no. JIPL/1124/12-13 on for 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-I



TPD MS Billet Plant which are under violation and 1x12 Ton Induction Furnace,

90,000 TPA Rolling Mill & 12 MW Power Plant under expansion.

V. Proposal was considered in 7th Reconstituted EAC Meeting of MoEF&CC on

04.04.2013 and as the proposal is for violation, MoEF&CC vide letter dated

12.06.2013 directed JIPL to submit compliance as per OM dated 12/12/2012.

JIPL submitted the Board Resolution and Credible action to MoEF&CC on

04.01.2014.

VI. The proposal was considered in 31st Reconstituted EAC meeting held on

08.01.2015 and again on 1st EAC Meeting held on 20.11.2015 and TOR for the

project was recommended. MoEF&CC vide letter dated 08.01.2016 granted

TOR.

VII. Public Hearing for the project was held on 06.05.2017. FINAL EIA was

submitted to MoEF&CC on 25.04.2018. EDS issued by MoEF&CC on 17.01.2019

mentioned; “The proposal is involved Violation for EIA Notification, 2006.

Therefore, you are requested to make application under violation after issue of

such notification for dealing of violation proposals”. The proposal was delisted

from theMinistry’s website on 07.06.2019.

VIII. JIPL requested MoEF&CC to relist the project and transfer the same to the

violation committee as ‘Lateral Proposal Entry’, as per MoEF&CC OM

09/09/2019.

IX. The Expert Appraisal Committee (Violation) deliberated the project during its

36th meeting held on 21.09.2020 and recommended for grant of TOR. Terms of

Reference for the proposed project was granted by MoEF&CC on 09.11.2020

vide F.No. J-11011/41/2013-IA-II(I).

5. Environmental site settings

Sl.No.

Particulars Details Remarks

i. Total land 14.38 ha

[Private land: 14.38 ha]

ii. Land acquisition details as per MoEF&CC O.M. dated 7/10/2014

Existing units in the plant are installed in 10.34 Ha. of land

JIPL has taken adjacent land area of 4.04 Ha. on 30 years lease from with M/s Durga Cements Co. Ltd, Ramgarh on 12.03.2018

The entire project

will be installed in total area of 14.38 Ha.

iii. Existence of habitation & involvement of R&R, if any.

No R&R is involved

iv. Latitude and Longitude of the project site

Latitude: 23O38’ 48.47”N

Longitude: 85O27’37.77”E

v. Elevation of the project site 335 meters

vi. Involvement of Forest land if any Not Applicable

vii. Water body exists within the There is no water body within



Sl.No.


project site as well as study area the project site

Damodar River is present in the study area which is 0.3 km from the project site

viii. Existence of ESZ/ESA/national park/wildlife sanctuary/biosphere reserve/tiger reserve/elephant reserve etc. if any within the study area

None within study area

6. Consent to Operate for the existing non-violating units was accorded by Jharkhand

State pollution Control Board vide Ref. no. JSPCB/HO/RNC/CTO-

8096413/2020/1706. The validity of CTO is up to 30/09/2021.

7. Implementation status:

The Existing Units were installed after obtaining CTE from JSPCB. The Existing Units

of 2x100 TPD DRI kilns is installed and is in operation. Another 2x100TPD DRI Kilns

for production of 60,000 TPA sponge Iron and 2x12T Induction furnaces along with

Continuous Casting Mill for 240 TPD Billet productions were installed after getting

NOC from JSPCB on 06.11.2006. JIPL obtained CTO from the JSPCB till 31.12.2011.

8. The unit configuration and capacity of existing and proposed project is given below:

Sl.

No

Project

Details

Existing Installed Units Proposed Units

Total

(Existing + Proposed) Non-Violating Violating Units

Unit Prod.

(TPA) Unit

Prod.

(TPA) Unit

Prod.

(TPA) Unit

Prod.

(TPA)

1. Sponge

Iron Plant

2X100

TPD 60,000

2X100

TPD 60,000 - -

4x100

TPD 120,000

2. Induction

Furnaces - 2X12T 1x12T 3X12T

3. Billet

Caster

2strand

6/11m 72,000

1strand

6/11m 36,000

3strand

6/11m 108,000

4. Rolling

Mill - -

300

TPD 90,000 300 TPD 90,000

5.

Captive

Power

Plant - -

AFBC

Boiler 1

12

MW 1 12 MW

WHRB 4 6 MW 4 6 MW



9. The details of the raw material requirement for the proposed expansion project

along with its source and mode of transportation is given as below:

Sl. No.

Item Requirement MT per Year Source Mode of Transport

(Distance w.r.t. plant

Existing (Non-

Violating Units)

Existing (Violating

Units)

Proposed Total

1. Iron Ore

102,000 102,000

- 204,000 Arya Iron & Steel

Co. Pvt. Ltd.,

Odisha

170 km by Rail

10 km from Railway Siding (Barkhakhana)

2. Coal

84,000 84,000

70,000 238,000 CCL, Saunda 18 km by Rail

10 km from Railway Siding (Barkhakhana)

3. Dolomite 3,000 3,000 - 6,000 Local Market 50 km by Road

4. Scrap - 16,500

8,250

24,750

Local Market 20 km by Road

10. The make-up water requirement for the project is estimated as 2,906KLD.

Permission for drawl of 0.65MGD (2955KLD) from Damodar River has been obtained

from Damodar Valley Corporation vide letter no MRO/Tariff Cell/JIPL/66 dated

04/02/2019

11. The power requirement for the project is estimated as 18 MW, which will be met

from Captive Power Plant. Prior to commissioning of CPP additional power will be

sourced from DVC and JBVNL.

12. Baseline Environmental Studies

Period 01.10.2020 to 31.12.2020

AAQ parameters at 8 locations PM2.5 = 32.6 to 56.5 μg/m3

PM10 = 61.4 to 95.8μg/m3 SO2 = 8.2 to 36.8 μg/m3

NO2 = 12.8 to 54.8 μg/m3 CO = 0.66 to 1.45 mg/m3

AAQ modelling (Incremental GLC)

PM10 = 2.08μg/m3

PM2.5 = 0.83 μg/m3

SO2 = 1.08 μg/m3 NOx = 0.55μg/m3

Ground water quality at 8 locations

pH: 7.15 to 7.62,

Total Hardness: 185to 235 mg/l, Chlorides: 50.0 to 61.0 mg/l,

Fluoride: 0.22 to 0.38 mg/l,

Heavy metals are within the limits

Surface water quality at 8 locations

pH: 7.42 to 7.68;

DO: 4.61 to 5.20 mg/l



BOD: 6.0 to 10.0 mg/l COD: 24.0 to 30.0 mg/l

Noise levels 45.1 to 69.9 dB(A) for the day time and 34.9 to 56.6 dB(A) for the Night time

Traffic assessment study findings

Two Roads were considered for Traffic study i.e. MDR-106 (Ranchi- NaisaraiRoad) and SH-2 (Ranchi Patratu Ramgarh Road)

After proposed Expansion the additional 270 PCU/day will be distributed among both the roads.The Level of Service of SH-2 is ‘A’ i.e. Free-flow and of MDR-106 is ‘D’ i.e.Medium Flow. Therefore, the proposed expansion will not have any significant impact in terms of Road Performance and its Capacity.

Flora and fauna No Schedule -1 Fauna is present within the study area.

13. The details of solid and hazardous waste generation along with its mode of

treatment/disposal is furnished as below:

Sl. No.

Type of Waste

Source Quantity in Tons (TPA)

Mode of Disposal Existing

(Non-Violating

Units)

Existing (Violating

Units)

Proposed

1 Dolochar Sponge Iron Plant

15,000 15,000 --- Will be used in AFBC Boiler

2 Dedusting Dust Sponge Iron Plant

11,040 11,040 --- MoU with Narsingh Ispat, Ramgarh for use in Sinter Plant or Pellet Plant

3 Wet Scrapper Sludge

Sponge Iron Plant

1,800 1,800 --- Non-hazardous and in small quantity. Used for filling of low-lying area.

4 IF Slag Steel Melting Shop

--- 11,000 5,500 After metal recovery (approx. 10%), remaining slag shall be crushed and will be used as aggregates

5 Sludge from Venturi Scrubber

Steel Melting Shop

-- 2,200 (in dry

condition)

1,100 (in dry

condition)

MoU with Narsingh Ispat for use in Sinter Plant or Pellet Plant

6 Scale Steel Melting Shop

-- 500 250 MoU with Narsingh Ispat for use in Sinter Plant

7 Mill Scale Rolling Mill -- --- 600 MoU with Narsingh Ispat for use in Sinter Plant

8 Fly-ash from CPP -- -- 27500 MoU with Durga



Sl. No.

Type of Waste

Source Quantity in Tons (TPA)

Mode of Disposal Existing

(Non-Violating

Units)

Existing (Violating

Units)

Proposed

WHRB Cement 9 Fly-ash from

AFBC CPP -- -- 41500 MoU with Durga

Cement 10 Bottom Ash

from AFBC CPP -- -- 10500 Will be given to the

nearby Brick kiln owners, to be used as fuel in their Kilns

14. Public Consultation:

Details of advertisement given 01.04.2017

Date of public consultation 06.05.2017

Venue Panchayat Bhawan, village & P.O. Marar, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand

Presiding Officer Additional Collector

Major issues raised Major Issues raised during the Public Hearing were regarding the Employment to Locals, Pollution Control Measures, Medical Facility and Safe Drinking Water.

Action plan as per MoEF&CC O.M. dated 30/09/2020

Sl.No

Concerns raised

during the Public

Hearing

Activity and Action Plan

Tentative Budget, Rs Lacs Target date for

implementation of action

plan

1st Year 2nd Year Total

1 Safe Drinking

Water

Installation of one

nos. of bore-well

based on Solar Pump

system along with

water storage Tank

each in Village Hesla

and Mahuatand,

District: Ramgarh

3,068,360

[Complete

installation of bore-

well having pump

based on Solar

power and water

storage tanks]

- 3,068,360

Oct 2023

2

Medical

Facility

Establishment of 16

Bedded Hospital

with advance

medical facilities

with affordable and

quality services in

village & P.O Marar,

District: Ramgarh

4,278,631

[Civil work for two

floor building]

8,222,479

[Hospital

equipment, Lift,

Furniture,

Electrification,

Air Conditioner,

etc]

12,501,110

Oct 2023

Grand Total in Lakhs 15,569,470



15. The total capital cost of the project is Rs 240.75 Crores and the capital cost for

environmental protection measures is proposed as Rs4.71Crores. The annual

recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures is proposed as Rs

0.34 Crores. The total employment generation from the proposed project is394. The

details of cost for environmental protection measures is as follows:

S.No. Description of Item Budget (Rs. In lakhs)

Capital Cost Recurring

Cost/Year

1 Air Pollution Control/Noise 200.0 10.0

2 Water Pollution Control 50.0 5.0

3 Environmental Monitoring and

Management

- 11.0

4 Green Belt Development 33.5 3.5

5 Solid Waste / Hazardous Waste

Management

4.0 1.5

6 OH & S 27.5 3.0

Total 315.0 34

Activity to Address Public Concerns 7 Installation of one nos. of bore-well based

on Solar Pump system along with water

storage Tank

30.68360

8 Establishment of 16 Bedded Hospital with advance medical facilities with affordable and quality services

125.01110

Total 155.69470

Total EMP Budget 470.6947

16. Greenbelt will be developed in 5.76 ha which is about 40% of the total project area.

A 10 m wide greenbelt, consisting of at least 3 tiers around plant boundary will be

developed as greenbelt and green cover as per CPCB/MoEF&CC, New Delhi

guidelines. Local and native species will be planted with a density of 1500 trees per

hectare. Total no. of 6700 saplings will be planted and nurtured in 5.76 hectares in

two years.

17. The Damage to the environment due to the various aspects of the environment

during construction and operation phase of the violation project was assessed and

the total damage cost was evaluated. The Damage Remediation Plan is proposed at

the estimated cost of Rs. 254.57 Lakhs and Natural Resource Augmentation Plan

and Community Resource Augmentation Plan are proposed at Rs. 101.3 Lakhs, each.

Hence, the damage cost is estimated at Rs. 355.87 Lakhs for Remediation Plan and

Natural and Community Resource Augmentation Plan



Summarized Total Damage Remediation plan Budget

A. Environment Damage Cost (in Rs. Lakhs)

Air Environment 89.00

Water Environment 110.00

Noise Environment 12.45

Land Environment 12.00

Biological Environment 21.50

Socio-Economic Environment 09.62

Damage Cost Evaluated 254.57

B. Profit Share from Violation Production (in Rs. Lakhs)

3% of Profit earned from violation production

31.30

C. Expenditure saved on Environment Management (in Rs. Lakhs)

Expenditure saved on recurring cost of EMP in violation period

70.00

Total cost of Damage assessment [A+B +C] Rs. 355.87 Lakhs

Yearly Budget for Remediation Plan

S.No. Environment Component

Activity Description

Total Budgetary Provision in Rs.

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd year Total

1

Land Environment

1. Assistance to

farmers by

providing

seedlings,

manure and

Bio-fertilizers

=

Rs.300,000/-

2. Concrete

flooring with

Shed for

storage of Raw

Materials,

Solid

wastes/slag/u

sed oil etc. Rs

200,000/-

3. Domestic

waste

collection

system in

village Argada:

Rs 200,000/-

500,000

(Assistance to farmers and

Concrete flooring)

300,000

(Domestic waste

collection system and

colour coded dustbins )

400,000

(Providing Bund maker,

Ridger, plough for agriculture purpose)

1,200,000






1st Year 2nd Year 3rd year Total 4. Providing 10

Nos. colour

coded

dustbins in

nearby villages

Rs. 100,000/-.

5. Providing

Bund maker,

Ridger, plough

for agriculture

purpose to

villagers Rs.

400,000/-

2

Air Environment

1. Sprinkling of

water on roads

of Chaingara,

Manuan and

Hathimara

villages = Rs

1,500,000/-

2. Total of 1200

trees will be

planted along

the approach

road of plant =

Rs.

1,000,000/-

3. Providing one

E-Rickshaw

for public

transport in

each

Hathimara and

Hesla village =

Rs

1,600,000/-.

4. Distribution

and

Maintenance

of air purifier

at panchayat

office of Hesla,

Chapri and

3,900,000

(Sprinkling of water on roads and

Battery operated

Road Sweeping

Machine for the main

road)

2,500,000

(Providing fixed water sprinklers/

fog canon on the

connecting roads

andProviding E-Rickshaw

for public transport)

2,500,000

(Plantation of 1200

Trees and Distribution

& Maintenance

of air purifier)

8,900,000






1st Year 2nd Year 3rd year Total Manuan

villages = Rs.

1,500,000/-.

5. Battery operated Road Sweeping Machine for the main road carrying mineral uptoBarkakhana railway siding (2 Machines @ Rs 12 lakh each) = Rs. 2,400,000

6. Providing

fixed water

sprinklers/ fog

canon on the

connecting

roads of Hesla,

Chhotakana

and Piri

villages = Rs.

900,000

3

Water Environment

1. Providing

drinking water

purifiers

(Aquafresh RO

system) for

Hathimara,

Chapri and

Barakana

villages (Rs.

800,000 x 3 +

200,000) = Rs.

2,600,000/-

2. Construction

of toilets

under Swatch

Bharat Mission

in Hathimara

5,100,000

(Providing drinking

water purifiers,

Construction of one solar

powered bore well and

Construction of two

Sedimentation tanks)

2,500,000

(Construction of toilet and Rain water harvesting

pond)

3,400,000

(Providing Health camp

for water borne and

Renovation of Ponds and construction of wharf and platforms in

ponds diseases)

11,000,000






1st Year 2nd Year 3rd year Total and Durgi

villages Rs.

1,000,000/-.

3. Construction of one solar powered bore well each in Chapri, Marar and Bumri villages for agriculture purpose = Rs. 1,000,000/-

4. Rain water harvesting pond at Panchayat office of Chhotakana, Piri and Durgi village = Rs.1,500,000/

5. Construction of two Sedimentation tanks for collection of surface water runoff in monsoon for Hesla, Pochra and Chosdhara villages Rs. 1,500,000/-

6. Providing Health camp for water borne diseases in Hesla, Piri, Marar, Sirka and Chainghara villages = Rs. 1,100,000/-

7. Renovation of Ponds and construction of






1st Year 2nd Year 3rd year Total wharf and platforms in ponds of Chaingara and Sirka villages(Rs. 1,000,000 x 2 + 300,000) = Rs. 2,300,000/-

4

Noise Environment

1. Health camp

for

Audiometry

Test in nearby

villages = Rs

500,000/-

2. Distribution of

Hearing aids to

the needed Sr.

Citizens of the

nearby area @

1000 x 500

person = Rs.

500,000/-

3. Plantation at

the Argada

village

periphery =

Rs.245,000/-

500,000

(Health camp for

Audiometry Test)

500,000

(Distribution of Hearing

aids)

245,000

(Plantation at the

Argada village)

1,245,000

5

Biological Environment

1. Tree

plantation at

Hesla and

Sirka villages =

Rs 650,000/-

2. Development

of Park and

plantation of

fruit bearing

trees in

Chhotakana

village = Rs.

700,000/-

3. Funds for

conservation

700,000

(Development of Park)

650,000

(Tree plantation

and)

800,000

(Funds for conservation

of aquatic life & Funds

for conservation

of fauna)

2,150,000






1st Year 2nd Year 3rd year Total of fauna

residing in

NaisaraiProtec

ted forest to

the District

Forest Office =

Rs. 400,000/

4. Funds for

conservation

of aquatic life

in Damodar

River to the

District

collector/

Water

resource

Department =

Rs. 400,000/-.

6

Socio-economic Environment

1. Organizing

health camps

for labourers =

Rs 100,000/-

2. Providing

medical camp

for domestic

animals = Rs

100,000/-.

3. Sports facility

i.e. Badminton

and Basketball

court will be

constructed for

promoting

sports/ games

in High school

of Chaingara

and Bumri

villages = Rs.

762,000

100,000

(Providing medical camp for domestic

animals)

100,000

(Organizing health

camps)

762,000

(Sports facility)

962,000

Total 10,800,000 6,550,000 8,107,000 25,457,000



Natural Resource Augmentation Plan along with budget

Sl. No.

Proposed Activities Budget (Rs.)


1

Installation of Bio-degradable

waste converter in Bumri and Hesla

village 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000

2

Renovation of community wells

along with water troughs for

animals at Durgi and Hesla villages 300,000 300,000 200,000 800,000

3 Providing Apiary facility in Manuan

and Durgi village 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000

4

Development of drainage system of 2 km in length and Repair of culverts in Argada and Hathimara villages

1,000,000 700,000 300,000 2,000,000

5 Installation of Cow sheds (Dimensions 30x10 m) in Piri and Chaingara villages

400,000 400,000 200,000 1,000,000

Total 2,100,000 1,800,000 1,100,000 5,000,000

Community Resource Augmentation Plan along with budget

Sl. No.



1 10 Computers with accessories will be provided to high school of Ramgarh

500,000 500,000 500,000 1,500,000

2

Providing Health Checkup camp and

materials related to Covid-19

prevention to the Hesla, Argada, Durgi

and Manuan villages. (Masks

Distribution @ Rs.50/mask, Sanitizers

@ Rs.500/sanitizer, Scientific

equipment (Shycocan@50000/Unit) in

four villages for enclosed public spaces

like hospital, schools, community hall,

etc. to prevent viral disease air & surface

transmission including Corona family of

viruses

1,000,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000

3 Provision of solar panel lighting (10 Lamps) in community areas of Sirka and Argada villages

400,000 200,000 200,000 800,000

4 Construction of Kalyan Mandap at Durgi and Chaprivillages

415,000 215,000 200,000 830,000

Total 2,315,000 1,415,000 1,400,000 5,130,000



Summary of Remediation Plan, Natural Resource Augmentation Plan and

Community Resource Augmentation Plan

S.No. Aspects Budget (Rs.)

1. Estimated Cost on remediation plan based on the damage assessment due to violation

25,457,000

2. Natural resource augmentation plan for 3 years 5,000,000

3. Community resource augmentation plan for 3 years 5,130,000

Total 35,587,000

18. The proponent has reported following cases:

Detail of Court Cases Case1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

a. Name of the court (District court/High Court/NGT/Tribunals /Supreme Court of India)

High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi

District Court of Ramgarh

District Court of Hazaribagh

High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi

b. Name of the Sub-court

- Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh

-

c. Case No. W.P.(C) No. 1125 of 2014

Complaint case No. 255/2021

Complaint case No. 331/2013

Cr. M.P. No. 760 of 2014

d. Orders / Directions of the court, if any and its relevance with the proposed project

The writ is pending for final disposal. Meanwhile Hon’ble High Court has passed interim order on 24.03.2014 for stay on clause no. 27 of Consent To Operate of JSPCB dated 10.12.2012, allowing the PP to operate the expanded part of unit.

Case has been filed on 25.03.2021 to initiate credible action against the project proponent however hearing is awaited to due to ongoing covid scenario.

Case has been filed on 21.12.2013 to initiate credible action against the project proponent

The writ is pending for final disposal. Meanwhile Hon’ble High Court has passed interim order on 08.05.2014 for stay on arrest of project proponent in connection with Complaint case no. 331/2013 .

e. Case Details Writ petition filed against clause no. 27 of Consent To Operate issued by

Case has been filed for the offence committed u/s 15 of Environment

Case has been filed for the offence committed u/s 15 of Environment

Writ petition filed on 11.03.2014 related to stay

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight



Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board on 10.12.2012 asking the unit to stop the operation of expanded part (2x100TPD DRI Kiln and 240TPD Billet Plant)

(Protection) Act, 1986 cognizance u/s 19 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 in compliance of MoEF & CC TOR letter J-11011/41/2013-IA.II(I) dated 09.11.2020

(Protection) Act, 1986 cognizance u/s 19 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 in compliance of MoEF & CC letter J-11011/41/2013-IA.II(I) dated 12.06.2013.

on proceedings of the complaint case 331 of 2013 in the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh against the project proponent.

19. Name of the EIA consultant: M/s Vardan Environet [S.L. No. 164 in QCI list of

accredited consultants dated 11.07.2020. Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1922/RA

0166].

20. Certified compliance report from Regional Office:

The Status of Compliance of CTO was obtained from JSPCB Regional Office,

Hazaribagh vide letter no. 476, dated 05/04/2021 in the name of M/s. Jharkhand

Ispat Pvt Ltd.

MoM of 40th meeting of the Re-constituted EAC (Industry-I) held on 15 – 16th July, 2021

Page 1 of 152

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change Impact Assessment Division

(Industry-1 Sector)

Date of zero draft MoM sent to Chairman: 20/07/2021 Approval by Chairman: 27/07/2021

Uploading on PARIVESH: 27/07/2021

Summary record of the Fortieth (40th) meeting of Re-Constituted Expert Appraisal Committee (REAC) held on 15 – 16th July, 2021 for environment appraisal of Industry-1 sector projects constituted under the provisions of Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification, 2006. The Fortieth meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for Industry-1 Sector constituted as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 for Environment Appraisal of Industry 1 Sector Projects was held on 15- 16th July, 2021 in the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) through video conferencing in view of the ongoing Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) issue. The list of EAC attendees is as follows:

S. No.

Name Position 15/07/2021 16/07/2021

1. Dr. Chhavi Nath Pandey Chairman Present Present 2. Dr. M.K. Gupta,

Director, CPPRI. Member Present Present

3. Dr. Siddharth Singh, Member Present Present 4. Dr. Jagdish Kishwan Member Present Present 5. Dr. Tejaswini Ananth

Kumar Member Present Present

6. Dr. G.V. Subramanyam Member Present Present 7. Shri. Ashok Upadhyaya Member Present Present 8. Shri. Rajendra Prasad

Sharma Member Present Present

9. Dr. Sanjay Deshmukh Member Absent Absent 10. Prof. S.K. Singh Member Present Present 11. Dr. R. Gopichandran Member Absent Absent 12. Shri Jagannadha Rao

Avasarala Member Present Present

13. Shri. J.S. Kamyotra Member Present Present Officials from MoEF&CC 14. Shri. Sundar Ramanathan Member

Secretary Present Present

15. Dr. Mahendra Phulwaria Scientist ‘C’ Present Present After welcoming the Committee Members, discussion on each of the agenda items was taken up. The minutes of 39th meeting held during 30th June -1st July, 2021 were confirmed by the EAC as already uploaded on PARIVESH.

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-J


Page 2 of 152

15th July, 2021 40.1 Sponge Iron Plant (4x100 TPD), Induction furnace (2x12T +1x12T), Rolling Mill (90,000

TPA) and 18 MW power plant [6 MW WHRB, 2 MW Coal char based and 10 MW Coal based] of M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited located at Hesla, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand - [Online Proposal No. IA/JH/IND/212892/2020; File No. J-11011/41/2013-IA-II(I)] – Environment Clearance – regarding.

40.1.1 M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited has made an online application vide proposal no. IA/JH/IND/212892/2020 dated 03/06/2021 along with copy of EIA/EMP report and Form – 2 seeking Environment Clearance (EC) under the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 for the project mentioned above. The proposed project activity is listed at schedule no. 3(a) Metallurgical industries (ferrous &non-ferrous) under Category “A” of the schedule of the

EIA Notification, 2006 and attracts provisions of S.O. 804 (E) issued by MoEF&CC dated 14.03.2017 for the projects under Violation.

40.1.2 It was apprised to the EAC that aforesaid proposal was transferred from IA-Violation sector to IA-Industry 1 sector on 1/07/2021 for appraisal by the sectoral EAC. With the prior consent of the Chairman, EAC – Industry 1 sector, Shri K. Gowrappan, Member, EAC – Violation sector have been co-opted for appraisal of the instant proposal consideration.

Details submitted by Project proponent

40.1.3 The detail of the ToR is furnished as below: Date of application Consideration Details Date of accord PP made online application dated 25/04/2018 to (Industry-1). Later on, PP requested the MoEF&CC on 27/11/2019 to transfer the proposal made in EAC (Industry-1) to EAC (Violation) as ‘Lateral Proposal

Entry’ as per MoEF&CC Office Memorandum dated 09/09/2019.

31st EAC (Violation) held on 28th Feb, 2020, 33rd EAC (Violation) held on 18-19th May, 2020, 36th meeting of EAC (Violation) held on 21.09.2020

Terms of Reference

09/11/2020

40.1.4 The project of M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited located in Hesla, P.O. Argada, District

Ramgarh, Jharkhand is for Sponge Iron Plant (4x100 TPD), Induction furnace (2x12T +1x12T), Rolling Mill (90,000 TPA) and 18 MW power plant [6 MW WHRB, 2 MW Coal char based and 10 MW Coal based].

40.1.5 Environmental site settings SNo Particulars Details Remarks

i. Total land 14.38 ha [Private land: 14.38 ha]

ii. Land acquisition details as per MoEF&CC O.M. dated 7/10/2014

Existing units in the plant are installed in 10.34 ha. of land JIPL has taken adjacent land area of 4.04 ha on 30 years lease from with M/s. Durga Cements Co. Ltd, Ramgarhon

The entire project will be installed in total area of 14.38 ha.

VCOMGGM104

Highlight


Page 3 of 152

SNo Particulars Details Remarks 12/03/2018

iii. Existence of habitation & involvement of R&R, if any.

No R&R is involved

iv. Latitude and Longitude of the project site

Latitude: 23O38’ 48.47” N Longitude: 85O27’37.77” E

v. Elevation of the project site 335 meters above MSL vi. Involvement of Forest land if

any Nil

vii. Water body exists within the project site as well as study area

Project site: Nil Study area: Damodar River : 0.3 km/South

viii. Existence of ESZ/ESA/national park/wildlife sanctuary/biosphere reserve/tiger reserve/elephant reserve etc. if any within the study area

Nil. Following forest are exists in the study area: Protected forest located at 5.0km (SW), 5.5km (NNE), 8.4km (South), 9.2 km (NNW)

40.1.6 Chronology of exiting NOC/ Clearances:

S No Date NOC/ Clearance

Detail

1. 31/07/2003 NOC* Issued by Jharkhand State pollution Control Board (JSPCB) for Sponge Iron Plant: 200 MT/day (DRI Kiln: 2x100 TPD)

2. 06/11/2006 NOC** Issued by JSPCB for another Sponge Iron unit: 200 MT/day (DRI Kiln: 2x100 TPD) and MS Billets: 240 TPD (IF: 2x12 T with Billet Caster)

3. 24/12/2011 CTO Issue by JSPCB for Sponge Iron- 4x100 TPD, M.S. Billet-240 TPD.

4. 10/12/2012 CTO*** renewal

Issued for Sponge Iron Plant: 200 MT/day (DRI Kiln: 2x100 TPD).

5. 10/10/2020 CTO renewal

Issued for Sponge Iron Plant: 200 MT/day (DRI Kiln: 2x100 TPD) and valid up to 30/09/2021.

Note: * As the project cost was less than 100 Cr., the environmental clearance as per EIA Notification, 1994 was not required.

** PP has been committed Violation under EIA Notification 14th September, 2006. *** JSPCB directed to PP to give clarification in person to Member Secretary as to

why the application for grant of CTO for 2x100 TPD sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billets plant installed during 2006 should not be revoked. Thereafter, JSPCB granted CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013 only for operation of 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant, installed during the year 2013.

40.1.7 After revoked the facilities under violation by JSPCB during CTO renewal, PP sought for Environment Clearance for the following: M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited submitted application on 11/01/2013 for grant of

ToR to Obtaining Environmental clearance for the enhancement of sponge iron


Page 4 of 152

production from 60,000 TPA to 120,000 TPA and production of 72,000 TPA MS Billets through already installed 2x100 TPD DRI Kiln and 2x12T Induction Furnace under violation; and for the proposed 1x12T Induction furnace for production of 36,000 TPA MS Billets along with installation of additional 300 TPD Rolling Mill for production of 90,000 TPA TMT bars along with 18MW Captive Power Plant (12MW AFBC & 6MW WHRB), under expansion.

Proposal was considered in 7th Re-EAC (Industry) held on 04/04/2013 and as the proposal was for violation, MoEF&CC vide letter dated 12/06/2013 directed PP to submit compliance as per OM dated 12/12/2012. Accordingly, PP submitted the Board resolution and credible action to MoEF&CC on 04/01/2014.

Proposal was considered in 31st Re-EAC (Industry) held on 08/01/2015 and again considered on 1st meeting of EAC held on 20/11/2015 and ToR for the project was recommended, subsequently MoEF&CC granted the ToR on 08/01/2016.

After conducting the public hearing on 06/05/2017 final EIA submitted on 25/04/2018. EDS was issued by MOEF&CC dated 17/01/2019 mentioned “the proposal is involved

violation under the provisions of EIA notification, 2006. Therefore, PP was requested to make application under violation after issue of such notification for dealing of violation proposals”. The proposal is delisted from Ministry’s website on 07/06/2019.

PP requested MoEF&CC to relist the proposal and transfer the same to the violation committee as ‘lateral Proposal Entry’, as per MoEF&CC Office Memorandum dated 09/09/2019.

Proposal was considered in 33rd meeting of EAC (Violation) held on 18.05.2020. committee recommended to submit the duly signed hard copy of the following documents:

a) Revised Form-1 and PFR having details of Violation. b) Year-wise production detail s including total cost of the project, prior to

September, 2006. PP submitted the sought documents by EAC (Violation) to MoEF&CC on 08/09/2020. Proposal was considered in 36th meeting of EAC (Violation) held on 21-22nd September,

2020. The EAC, after detail deliberation appraised the instant proposal and confirmed the case to be of violation of the EIA Notification, 2006 and recommended for issuing the ToR. Accordingly, MoEF&CC granted the ToR on 09/11/2020.

40.1.8 The unit configuration and capacity of existing and proposed project is given as below:

Sl. No

Project Details

Existing Installed Units Proposed Units Total (Existing + Proposed) Non-Violating Violating Units

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

1. Sponge Iron Plant

2x100 TPD

60,000 2x100 TPD

60,000 - - 4x100 TPD

120,000

2. Induction Furnaces

- 2x12T 1x12T 3x12T

3. Billet Caster 2strand 6/11m

72,000 1strand 6/11m

36,000 3strand 6/11m

108,000

4. Rolling Mill - - 300 TPD 90,000 300 TPD 90,000 5. Captive

Power Plant - -

AFBC Boiler 1 12 MW 1 12 MW WHRB 4 6 MW 4 6 MW


Page 5 of 152

40.1.9 The details of the raw material requirement for the proposed expansion cum proposed project along with its source and mode of transportation is given as below:

Sl. No.

Item Requirement MT per Year Source Mode of Transport

(Distance w.r.t. plant

Existing (Non-Violating

Units)

Existing (Violating

Units)

Proposed Total

1. Iron Ore 102,000 102,000 - 204,000 Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd., Odisha

170 km by Rail 10 km from Railway Siding (Barkhakhana)

2. Coal 84,000 84,000 70,000 238,000 CCL, Saunda 18 km by Rail 10 km from Railway Siding (Barkhakhana)

3. Dolomite 3,000 3,000 - 6,000 Local Market 50 km by Road 4. Scrap - 16,500 8,250 24,750 Local Market 20 km by Road

40.1.10 Existing (Non-violating): 170 KLD, Existing (Violating): 406 KLD, Proposed: 2330 KLD

Total after Expansion: 2906 KLD. Thus the make-up water requirement for the project is estimated of 2,906 KLD. Permission for drawl of 0.65MGD (2955KLD) from Damodar River has been obtained from Damodar Valley Corporation vide letter no MRO/Tariff Cell/JIPL/66 dated 04/02/2019.

40.1.11 Existing – 10.5 MW (Non-Violating – 0.8 MW & 9.7 MW for violating Units) Proposed – 7.5 MW (Expansion) Total after expansion: 18.00 MW, which will be met from Captive Power Plant. Prior to commissioning of CPP additional power will be sourced from DVC and JBVNL.

40.1.12 Baseline Environmental Studies Period 01/10/2020 to 31/12/2020 AAQ parameters at 8 locations

PM2.5 = 32.6 to 56.5 μg/m3 PM10 = 61.4 to 95.8μg/m3 SO2 = 8.2 to 36.8 μg/m3 NO2 = 12.8 to 54.8 μg/m3 CO = 0.66 to 1.45 mg/m3

AAQ modelling (Incremental GLC)

PM10 = 2.08μg/m3 PM2.5 = 0.83 μg/m3 SO2 = 1.08 μg/m3 NOx = 0.55μg/m3


pH: 7.15 to 7.62, Total Hardness: 185 to 235 mg/l, Chlorides: 50.0 to 61.0 mg/l, Fluoride: 0.22 to 0.38 mg/l, Heavy metals are within the limits

Surface water quality at 8locations

pH: 7.42 to 7.68; DO: 4.61 to 5.20 mg/l BOD: 6.0 to 10.0 mg/l COD: 24.0 to 30.0 mg/l

Noise levels 45.1 to 69.9 dB(A) for the day time and 34.9 to 56.6 dB(A) for the Night time


Page 6 of 152


Two Roads were considered for Traffic study i.e. MDR-106 (Ranchi- Naisarai Road) and SH-2 (Ranchi Patratu Ramgarh Road) After proposed Expansion the additional 270 PCU/day will be distributed among both the roads. The Level of Service of SH-2 is ‘A’ i.e. Free-flow and of MDR-106 is ‘D’ i.e. Medium Flow. Therefore, the proposed expansion will not have any significant impact in terms of Road Performance and its Capacity.

Flora and fauna No Schedule -1 Fauna is present within the study area.

40.1.13 The details of solid and hazardous waste generation along with its mode of treatment/disposal is furnished as below:

Sl. No.

Type of Waste Source Quantity in Tons (TPA) Mode of Disposal Existing

(Non-Violating

Units)

Existing (Violating

Units)

Proposed

1 Dolochar Sponge Iron Plant

15,000 15,000 --- Will be used in AFBC Boiler

2 De-dusting Dust Sponge Iron Plant

11,040 11,040 --- MoU with Narsingh Ispat, Ramgarh for use in Sinter Plant or Pellet Plant

3 Wet Scrapper Sludge

Sponge Iron Plant

1,800 1,800 --- Non-hazardous and in small quantity. Used for filling of low-lying area.

4 IF Slag Steel Melting Shop

--- 11,000 5,500 After metal recovery (approx. 10%), remaining slag shall be crushed and will be used as aggregates

5 Sludge from Venturi Scrubber

Steel Melting Shop

-- 2,200 (in dry condition)

1,100 (in dry condition)

MoU with Narsingh Ispat for use in Sinter Plant or Pellet Plant

6 Scale Steel Melting Shop

-- 500 250 MoU with Narsingh Ispat for use in Sinter Plant

7 Mill Scale Rolling Mill -- --- 600 MoU with Narsingh Ispat for use in Sinter Plant

8 Fly-ash from WHRB

CPP -- -- 27500 MoU with Durga Cement

9 Fly-ash from AFBC

CPP -- -- 41500 MoU with Durga Cement

10 Bottom Ash from AFBC

CPP -- -- 10500 Will be given to the nearby Brick kiln owners, to be used as fuel in their Kilns

40.1.14 Public Consultation:

Details of advertisement given 01/04/2017 Date of public consultation 06/05/2017


Page 7 of 152

Venue Panchayat Bhawan, village & P.O. Marar, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand

Presiding Officer Additional Collector Major issues raised i. Plantation

ii. Employment to Locals and adequate wages, iii. Agriculture affected due to pollution iv. Pollution Control Measures, v. Medical Facility and Safe Drinking Water.

Action plan as per MoEF&CC O.M. dated 30/09/2020

SNo

Concerns raised during

the Public Hearing

Activity and Action Plan

Tentative Budget, Rs Lacs Target date for implementation of action plan

1st Year 2nd Year Total

1 Safe Drinking Water

Installation of one nos. of bore-well based on Solar Pump system along with water storage Tank each in Village Hesla and Mahuatand, District: Ramgarh

3,068,360 [Complete installation of bore-well having pump based on Solar power and water storage tanks]

- 3,068,360 Oct 2023

2

Medical Facility

Establishment of 16 Bedded Hospital with advance medical facilities with affordable and quality services in village & P.O Marar, District: Ramgarh

4,278,631 [Civil work for two floor building]

8,222,479 [Hospital equipment, Lift, Furniture, Electrification, Air Conditioner, etc]

12,501,110 Oct 2023

Grand Total in Lakhs

15,569,470

40.1.15 The total capital cost of the project is Rs 240.75 Crores and the capital cost for environmental

protection measures is proposed as Rs4.71Crores. The annual recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures is proposed as Rs 0.34 Crores. The total employment generation from the proposed project is 394. The details of cost for environmental protection measures are as follows:

S. No.

Description of Item Budget (Rs. In lakhs) Capital Cost Recurring

Cost/Year 1 Air Pollution Control/Noise 200.0 10.0 2 Water Pollution Control 50.0 5.0 3 Environmental Monitoring and Management - 11.0 4 Green Belt Development 33.5 3.5 5 Solid Waste / Hazardous Waste Management 4.0 1.5 6 OH & S 27.5 3.0

Total 315.0 34 7 Addressal of Public Consultation concerns 155.695

Total EMP Budget 470.695


Page 8 of 152

40.1.16 1.54 ha area covered with 2000 trees as existing green belt program. After expansion greenbelt will be developed in 5.76 ha which is about 40% of the total project area. A 10 m wide greenbelt, consisting of at least 3 tiers around plant boundary will be developed as greenbelt and green cover as per CPCB/MoEF&CC, New Delhi guidelines. PP proposed total no. of 6700 (Density: 1510 trees/ ha) saplings for 5.76 hectares to be planted in two years.

40.1.17 Summary of violation under EIA, 2006 furnished below:

Company has installed 2x100TPD DRI Kiln and 2x12T Induction Furnace after obtaining NOC from JSPCB on 06.11.2006 and is operating the same till date, without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance as per EIA Notification 2006. The Damage Assessment was carried out for violation period for Construction and Operation Phase. The total amount to be spent on Remediation plan and Natural Resource Augmentation Plan and Community Resource Augmentation Plan will be Rs.355.87 Lakhs. This plan will be implemented in three years after obtaining all necessary clearances. Detail is as given below: Damage Assessment and Remediation Plan Activity/ Causes of

pollution Probable Impacts Environmental

measures already taken

Damage Assessment Remediation plan Budget (Rs. Lakhs)

Land Environment 1. Land Acquisition 2. Excavation 3. Generation of

Hazardous waste like empty cans of paints, fuel/oil

4. Land contamination due to spill of oil, paint, varnishes etc., during construction phase

5. Generation of construction solid wastes

6. Slag deposition from IF

7. Waste from Kilns

1. Change in Land use/ Land cover of site

2. Change in topography and drainage pattern

3. Land contamination due to deposition of dust

4. Soil erosion 5. Impact on

productivity and fertility of the soil

6. Contamination of Soil. Leaching may affect Ground water quality.

7. Land contamination due to unmanaged disposal of solid waste/ Construction waste.

1. No change in land use as land taken for expansion is Industrial

2. Sprinkling of water to reduce fugitive dust emission.

3. Material storage on RCC flooring and under sheds.

4. Separate bins for onsite collection and segregation of domestic waste.

5. Filling of low-lying area with construction wastes

6. Construction of storm water drains to divert storm water from flowing over the construction areas.

7. Installation of oil and grease traps in construction workshop

8. IF slag was used for Construction. Kiln waste, Wet Scrapper Sludge used for filling low lying area and PC dust and

1. Removal of top soil

2. Dust pollution in dry season

3. Contamination of land / soil/ water due to no use solid wastes like dolochar and PC dust.

4. Effects on Flora/ Fauna

5. Health effects on workers handling chemical/ oil / fuel / paints etc.

6. Health effects on workers handling slag and solid waste.

1. Assistance to farmers by providing seedlings, manure and bio fertilizers = Rs.300,000/-

2. Concrete flooring with Shed for storage of Raw Materials, Solid wastes/ slag/ used oil etc. Rs 200,000/-

3. Domestic waste collection system in village Argada: Rs 200,000/-

4. Providing 10 Nos. colour coded dustbins in nearby villages Rs. 100,000/-.

5. Providing Bund maker, Ridger, plough for agriculture purpose to villagers Rs. 400,000/-.

VCOMGGM104

Highlight


Page 9 of 152

Activity/ Causes of pollution

Probable Impacts Environmental measures

already taken


dolochar were other plants

Total Cost On Remediation Measures For Land Environment 1,200,000

Air Environment

1. Site Clearance (removal of shrubs)

2. Soil Excavation 3. Loading and

Unloading of construction material

4. Operation of DG Sets

5. Transportation of construction materials through Vehicles

6. Operation of construction machineries like Mixer and others

7. Transportation of Raw materials

8. Operation of DRI Kilns and Induction Furnaces

1. Dust emission during site cleaning

2. Dust emission during loading & unloading of construction material

3. Dust and gaseous emission from transportation of construction material

4. Dust emission during loading & unloading of raw materials

5. Dust and gaseous emission from transportation of raw materials.

6. Emissions from DRI Kilns and Induction Furnaces

1. Water sprinkling on haul road.

2. Only PUC certified vehicles were allowed to enter the site.

3. Material were transported with covered trucks

4. Wheel Wash arrangement was provided.

5. ‘Pacca road’ inside plant

6. Water sprinkling on ‘kaccha road’

7. Venturi Scrubber and ESP system was provided to IF and DRI Kilns, respectively for control of air emissions

1. Air Pollution due to installation of two Kilns and IFs

2. Air pollution due to operation of two Kilns and IFs

1. Sprinkling of water through water tankers on roads of Chaingara, Manuan and Hathimara villages = Rs 1,500,000/-.

2. Total of 1200 trees will be planted along the approach road of plant = Rs. 1,000,000/-

3. Providing E-Rickshaw for public transport in Hathimara and Hesla villages = Rs 1,600,000/-.

4. Distribution and Maintenance of air purifier at panchayat office of Hesla, Chapri and Manuan villages = Rs. 1,500,000/-.

5. Battery operated Road Sweeping Machine for the main road carrying mineral up to Barkakhana railway siding (2 Machines @ Rs 12 lakh each) = Rs. 2,400,000

6. Providing fixed water sprinklers/ fog canon on the connecting roads of Hesla, Chhotakana and Piri villages = Rs. 900,000.

Total Cost of Remediation Measures for Air Environment 8,900,000

Water Environment

Fresh water requirement 1. Water requirement

for Site Preparation and Infrastructure development

2. Water requirement for construction activities

3. Water requirement for domestic use.

4. Water requirement for operation of Induction Furnaces & DRI Kilns

1. Approximately 960 KL water has been used in various construction activities like dust suppression RMC Production, Cement Blocks Brick Preparation, Plastering etc and domestic water for 120 days.

2. Approx. 375,000 KL was used during operation of 2 Induction Furnaces and DRI kilns

1. Curing compounds was used to reduce the usage of water during construction purpose.

2. Industrial and domestic waste water was reused after treatment.

The rain water during construction/ Operation phase was neither used for storage/ recharge and wasted completely Ground water was used during construction and Operation phases

1. Providing drinking water purifiers (Aquafresh RO system) through borewell and storage tank for Hathimara, Chapri and Barakana villages (Rs. 800,000 x 3 + 200,000) = Rs. 2,600,000/-.

2. Renovation of Ponds and construction of wharf and platforms in ponds of Chaingara and Sirka villages (Rs. 1,000,000 x 2 + 300,000) = Rs. 2,300,000/-


Page 10 of 152



already taken


Waste Water 1. Generated due to

domestic use 2. Generated during

construction activity 3. Waste water

generated during operation of Induction Furnace and DRI Kilns

1. Water Logging & Mosquito breeding

2. Soil Contamination

3. Odor issues 4. Ground water

contamination.

1. Existing toilet facilities with Septic tank with Soak pit was used by construction labours.

2. Waste water was treated in neutralization pit during operation of Induction Furnace

3. Training of staff & labours on the site for proper usage of water through signage

1. Leaching of waste water in the soil

2. Runoff during rains will lead to increase in pollutants in surface

1. Construction of toilet under Swatch Bharat Mission in Hathimara and Durgi villages = Rs. 1,000,000/-

2. Construction of one solar powered bore well each in Chapri, Marar and Bumri villages for agriculture purpose = Rs. 1,000,000/-

Storm Water 1. Increase in Sediment load

2. Contamination of Soil due to run off from construction site.

1. Separate storm water drainage to avoiding mixing of plant effluent with storm water

1. Water logging in area leading to breading of mosquito

2. Deterioration of the water channel/ drain and impact on aquatic life.

3. Reduction in ground water recharge quantum due to coverage of land with impervious materials

1. Rain water harvesting system at Panchayat office of Chhotakana, Piri and Durgi villages = Rs.1,500,000/-

2. Construction of two Sedimentation tanks for collection of surface water runoff in monsoon for Hesla, Pochra and Chosdhara villages Rs. 1,500,000/-

3. Providing Health camp for water borne diseases in Hesla, Piri, Marar, Sirka and Chainghara villages = Rs. 1,100,000

Total Cost on Remediation Measures for Water Environment 11,000,000

Noise Environment

1. Movement and operation of construction equipment

2. Construction activities

3. Transportation of construction materials in Trucks and Dumpers

4. Transportation of raw materials and finished products

5. Operation of Induction Furnaces and DRI Kilns

Generation of Noise may lead to: • Hearing loss, • Increase in blood

pressure • Stress • Sleep

interference

1. Construction workers working at site were provided with PPEs like ear plugs and ear muffs

2. Plant boundary wall, which is >3m has act as noise barrier, to reduce the level of noise outside the plant premises.

3. PPE were provided to the employees during operation phase, working in the high noise areas

1. Increase in ambient noise levels, causing discomfort to nearby residents’

and fauna.

1. Health camp for Audiometry Test in Hesla and Argada villages = Rs 500,000/-

2. Distribution of Hearing aids to the needed Sr. Citizens of the nearby area @ 1000 x 500 person = Rs. 500,000/-

3. Plantation at the Argada village periphery = Rs. 245,000/-

Total Cost On Remediation Measures For Noise Environment 1,245,000 Socio- Economic Environment


Page 11 of 152



already taken


1. Occupational Health and Amenities

2. Other social attributes

1. Impact on the heath and comfort of nearby residents.

2. Impact on the health of the construction and operational workers

3. Pressure on the existing infrastructure

4. Reduction in crop yield

5. Increased employment opportunities (direct & indirect)

6. Activities under CSR for the benefits of locals

1. PPEs were provided to all construction and operational workers

2. Periodical health examination of workers

3. Existing Medical Establishments in the area are adequate (There are 10-15 hospitals present in the vicinity of project site.)

1. Reduction in crop in the nearby agriculture field due to pollution.

2. Effect on the health of local residents

3. Pressure on the available resource like water

4. Injuries to labours while working at site

5. Health issues of construction and operational workers due to pollution

6. Health issues of cattle due to pollution

1. Organizing health camps for labourers = Rs 100,000/-

2. Providing medical camp for domestic animals = Rs 100,000/-.

3. Sports facility i.e. Badminton and Basketball court will be constructed for promoting sports/ games in High school of Chaingara and Bumri villages = Rs. 762,000

Total Cost On Remediation Measures For Socio-Economic Environment 962,000 Biological Environment 1. Clearing of shrubs

for installation of facilities

2. Air and Noise pollution during construction

3. Air & Noise pollution during operation of violation units

1. Habitat Fragmentation and other ecological attributes

2. Key species likely to be disturbed.

3. Loss of herbs and shrubs

1. No tree felling or removal of vegetation was involved for installation of the facilities under violation. Only shrubs were removed

2. No construction work was undertaken during night time.

1. Reduced photosynthesis due to air pollution has affected plant growth of nearby areas.

2. There may be loss of native species (flora & fauna)

1. Tree plantation at periphery of Hesla and Sirka villages = Rs 650,000/-

2. Development of Park and plantation of fruit bearing trees in Chhotakana village = Rs. 700,000/-

3. Funds for conservation of aquatic life in Damodar River to the District collector/ Water resource Department = Rs. 400,000/-.

4. Funds for conservation of fauna residing in Naisarai Protected forest to the District Forest Office = Rs. 400,000/-.

Total Cost On Remediation Measures for Biological Environment 2,150,000

Total Damage Cost on Remediation measures for Land, Air, Water, Noise, Socio & Biological Environment

25,457,000

Yearly Budget for Remediation Plan


Page 12 of 152

S No

Environment Component

Activity Description Total Budgetary Provision in Rs.

1st

Year 2nd

Year 3rd

year Total

1

Land Environment

1. Assistance to farmers by providing seedlings, manure and Bio-fertilizers = Rs.300,000/-

2. Concrete flooring with Shed for storage of Raw Materials, Solid wastes/ slag/ used oil etc. Rs 200,000/-

3. Domestic waste collection system in village Argada: Rs 200,000/-

4. Providing 10 Nos. colour coded dustbins in nearby villages Rs. 100,000/-.

5. Providing Bund maker, Ridger, plough for agriculture purpose to villagers Rs. 400,000/-

500,000

(Assistance to farmers and

Concrete flooring)

300,000

(Domestic waste

collection system and

colour coded dustbins )

400,000 (Providing Bund maker, Ridger,

plough for agriculture purpose)

1,200,000

2

Air Environment

1. Sprinkling of water on roads of Chaingara, Manuan and Hathimara villages = Rs 1,500,000/-

2. Total of 1200 trees will be planted along the approach road of plant = Rs. 1,000,000/-

3. Providing E-Rickshaw for public transport in Hathimara and Hesla village = Rs 1,600,000/-.

4. Distribution and Maintenance of air purifier at panchayat office of Hesla, Chapri and Manuan villages = Rs. 1,500,000/-.

5. Battery operated Road Sweeping Machine for the main road carrying mineral upto Barkakhana railway siding (2 Machines @ Rs 12 lakh each) = Rs. 2,400,000

6. Providing fixed water sprinklers/ fog canon on the connecting roads of Hesla, Chhotakana and Piri villages = Rs. 900,000

3,900,000 (Sprinkling of water on roads

and Distribution and Battery

operated Road Sweeping

Machine for the main road)

2,500,000

(Providing fixed water

sprinklers/ fog canon on the connecting roads and

Providing E- Rickshaw for

public transport)

2,500,000

(Plantation of 1200 Trees and Maintenance of

air purifier)

8,900,000

3 Water Environment

1. Providing drinking water purifiers (Aquafresh RO system) for Hathimara, Chapri and Barakana villages (Rs. 800,000 x 3 + 200,000) = Rs. 2,600,000/-

2. Construction of toilets under Swatch Bharat Mission in Hathimara and Durgi villages Rs. 1,000,000/-.

3. Construction of one

5,100,000

(Providing drinking water

purifiers, Construction of one solar

powered bore well and

Construction of two

Sedimentation tanks)

2,500,000 (Construction of toilet and Rain water harvesting

pond)

3,400,000

(Providing Health camp for water borne and Renovation of

Ponds and construction of

wharf and platforms in

ponds diseases)

11,000,000


Page 13 of 152

S No



1st

Year 2nd

Year 3rd

year Total

solar powered bore well each in Chapri, Marar and Bumri villages for agriculture purpose = Rs. 1,000,000/-

4. Rain water harvesting pond at Panchayat office of Chhotakana, Piri and Durgi village = Rs.1,500,000/

5. Construction of two Sedimentation tanks for collection of surface water runoff in monsoon for Hesla, Pochra and Chosdhara villages Rs.1,500,000/-

6. Providing Health camp for water borne diseases in Hesla, Piri, Marar, Sirka and Chainghara villages = Rs. 1,100,000/-

7. Renovation of Ponds and construction of wharf and platforms in ponds of Chaingara and Sirka villages (Rs. 1,000,000 x 2 + 300,000) = Rs. 2,300,000/-

4

Noise Environment

1. Health camp for Audiometry Test in nearby villages = Rs 500,000/-

2. Distribution of Hearing aids to the needed Sr. Citizens of the nearby area @ 1000 x 500 person= Rs. 500,000/-

3. Plantation at the Argada village periphery = Rs.245,000/-

500,000 (Health camp

for Audiometry Test)

500,000 (Distribution

of Hearing aids)

245,000 (Plantation at

the Argada village)

1,245,000

5 Biological Environment

1. Tree plantation at Hesla and Sirka villages = Rs 650,000/-

2. Development of Park and plantation of fruit bearing trees in Chhotakana village= Rs. 700,000/-

3. Funds for conservation of fauna residing in Naisarai Protected forest to the District Forest Office = Rs. 400,000/

4. Funds for conservation of aquatic life in Damodar River to the District collector/ Water resource Department = Rs. 400,000/.

700,000 (Development

of Park)

650,000

(Tree plantation and)

800,000

(Funds for conservation of

aquatic life & Funds for

conservation of fauna)

2,150,000


Page 14 of 152

S No



1st

Year 2nd

Year 3rd

year Total

6

Socio- economic Environment

1. Organizing health camps for labourers = Rs 100,000/-

2. Providing medical domestic animals = Rs 100,000/-.

3. Sports facility i.e. Badminton and Basketball court will be constructed for promoting sports/ games in High school of Chaingara and Bumri villages = Rs. 762,000

100,000 (Providing medical camp for domestic animals)

100,000 (Organizing

health camps)

762,000 (Sports facility)

962,000

Total 10,800,000 6,550,000 8,107,000 25,457,000


Sl. No. Proposed Activities Budget (Rs.)

1st

Year 2nd

Year 3rd

year Total

1 Installation of Bio-degradable waste converter in Bumri and Hesla village

200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000

2

Renovation of community wells along with water troughs for animals at Durgi and Hesla villages

300,000 300,000 200,000 800,000

3 Providing Apiary facility in Manuan and Durgi village

200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000

4 Development of drainage system of 2 km in length and Repair of culverts in Argada and Hathimara villages

1,000,000 700,000 300,000 2,000,000

5 Installation of Cow sheds (Dimensions 30x10 m) in Piri and Chaingara villages

400,000 400,000 200,000 1,000,000

Total 2,100,000 1,800,000 1,100,000 5,000,000


Sl. No.


1st

Year 2nd

Year 3rd

year Total

1 10 Computers with accessories will be provided to high school of Ramgarh

500,000 500,000 500,000 1,500,000

2 Providing Health Checkup camp and materials related to Covid-19 prevention to the Hesla, Argada, Durgi and Manuan villages. (Masks Distribution @ Rs.50/mask, Sanitizers @ Rs.500/sanitizer, Scientific equipment (Shycocan) in four villages for enclosed public spaces like hospital, schools, community hall, etc to prevent viral disease air & surface transmission Including Corona family of viruses@50000/Unit)

1,000,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000

3 Provision of solar panel lighting (10 Lamps) in community areas of Sirka and Argada villages

400,000 200,000 200,000 800,000

4

Construction of Kalyan Mandap at Durgi and Chapri villages

415,000 215,000 200,000 830,000

Total 2,315,000 1,415,000 1,400,000 5,130,000

40.1.18 Name of the EIA consultant: M/s. Vardan Environet [S.L. No. 38 List of ACOs with their

Certificate / Extension Letter no. Rev. 12, July 09, 2021]. Certified Compliance report from Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board

40.1.19 The Status of compliance of earlier CTO was obtained from Jharkhand State Pollution

mailto:viruses@50000


Page 15 of 152

Control Board vide letter no. 476 dated 05/04/2021 in the name of M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited. As per inspection report of JSPCB, the PP is complying CTO conditions.

Observations of the Committee

40.1.20 The Committee noted the following: i. Water balance diagram for DRI shall be checked and corrected. The water balance

diagram for monsoon season shall be submitted and explained. ii. In transportation study report, the Level of Service (LOS) in MDR-106 is “D” which

has to be improved by working out alternate route or by other measures to bring the LOS to at least B.

iii. In Public hearing Grievances one of the main requirements raised was to reduce dust impact in nearby villages which needs to be addressed by an action plan like providing greenbelt / thick plantation-surrounding nearby villages like Argada, eski, etc. A detailed study of these areas to be conducted to find out the requirements to mitigate the same and the budgetary provision with specific quantity and period shall be incorporated.

iv. Details of management of effluent and storm water during monsoon to be furnished. v. Action plan for green belt development needs to be revisited as the density proposed

for green belt is 1500 trees per ha which is not as per the CPCB norms. vi. PM10 at site, Argada and Sirka in post project scenario shall exceed 100 µg/m3 under

worst case scenario. No specific EMP has been suggested to bring it down. vii. AAQ modelling shall be again carried out as same mixing height is used for day and

night time which is not correct. viii. Damage assessment report

a. Lump sum Cost taken for topsoil damage of quantity 25100 cum to be revised by assigning unit cost per Cum (I.e. Rs.15 Per cum) against total quantity.

b. Table 13.5 to be revised and damage due to emission of Sox & NoX during construction to be included. Details of equipment / machinery operating hours, working hours per day, vehicle lead distance, total open area / non constructed area under impact of wind erosion and fuel consumption to be included.

c. Emission from all sources and for total production since 2006 to be considered for calculation of impact due to air emission. Emission from material handling, internal transportation, and impact of wind erosion from stockyard to be included for calculation of total impact.

d. Monetary value in Table 13.13 to be corrected as per revised total emission under controlled environment.

e. Rainwater runoff to be revised based on specific land use runoff coefficient for different types of land cover, covering total plot area for both construction and operation period.

f. For compensation of rainwater loss, total cost of construction of RWH structures shall be taken as damage cost. Cost of RWH structure can be referred from respective state guidelines.

g. Table 13.9 to be revised as per standard water requirement of not less than 1 KL per 1 SqMtr constructed area for total area of 2.97 ha and water usage for other activities


Page 16 of 152

to be included as per water balance table apart from DRI Kiln and induction furnace with CCM for complete operation period since 2006.

h. The damage cost taken for noise to be revised and damage to be calculated as per CPCB guidelines / Noise rules 2000 and NGT directions on same.

i. The damage cost taken for biodiversity and crop damage to be revised as per Indian standards and reference.

j. The damage cost taken against gap plantation to be revised @2500 trees per hectare. k. The amount allotted against PH grievance as per OM dated 30/09/2020 should be

worked out considering Greenbelt / thick plantation for nearby two villages as mentioned above and to be included in the EMP cost.

l. The activities and corresponding cost proposed under Remediation plan, Natural and Community resource augmentation plan to be revisited, and actual cost as per market standards to be included for same. The proposed activity to each village needs to be quantified.

m. The activities under the above shall be specific with time period of 3 years and monitorable.

ix. Argada Village is 200 m from site in west. Raw material yard is located adjacent to boundary facing the village. Hels village is 400 m from site in east. Environmental safeguards to be adopted has not been mentioned.

x. Table number 3.16, 3.17 and 3.18 of EIA report pertaining to analysis of soil samples, land use pattern, villages selected for socio-economic survey needs to be revisited and corrected.

xi. Damodar river is located at a distance of 0.3km from the project site in southern direction. Authenticated HFL details of the river, protection measures to be adopted along river side and impact on riverine ecology has not been submitted.

Recommendations of the Committee

40.1.21 In view of the foregoing and after deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal to be returned in its present form to address the technical deficiencies enumerated above.

40.2 Proposed Expansion of Ferro Alloy Plant (SAF 1x9 MVA) by installation of 3x5 MVA SAFs

and Ferro-Chrome Briquetting Plant (10 TPH) by M/s. Metsil Exports Private Limited located at Basudebpur (North), Barjora, District Bankura, West Bengal [Online Proposal No. IA/WB/IND/51722/2010; File No. J-11011/371/2009-IA.II (I)] – Environment Clearance – regarding.

40.2.1 M/s. Metsil Exports Private Limited has made an online application vide proposal no. IA/WB/IND/51722/2010 dated 28/06/2021 along with copy of EIA/EMP report and Form– 2 seeking Environment Clearance (EC) under the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006. The proposed project activity is listed at schedule no. 3(a) Metallurgical industries (ferrous & nonferrous) under Category “A” of the schedule of the EIA Notification, 2006 and appraised at Central Level.

Details submitted by the project proponent

40.2.2 The detail of the ToR is furnished as below:

�� !�"��#$�%��&��'��(��)�*��'��+�,��-

��.$��*��#��/�,0��(�1*�2��30.�2$�*�0��2.��$��0�$��41��5�56(�7�5�6��(�7�2$��.�0�$��41��5�56(�7- ��

89:;<<=>?@�A;>B;C�DE9:;<<=>?@FG;>B;CHIJHKCLM?9CB;�N:9E�OJH�PQHR�JS�PQ:T�UVMW�XNCB=Y:>@Z[\�E99:KC?�:J�]9�T9<B�JC�[:T_9I9E]9>�RR[�Z�aT;>bT;CB�NYc;:�dG:�e:B�89:;<<=>?@�A;>B;C�f��#�%g��*��h i��)�*��7��j�k��,�l*..�g��*��*�.��%g��*��*��*..�g��*��$��$��5�g��*��m,�$�3�g��*��m$3��*�g��*��$��g��*��#.��%g��*��.$�1g��*��*$��g%��*��$,$��*�g��*��.�*��(�g��*��$�m��g��*��,�%��g%��*��**g��$#��g��*��$#��1g��*��!*��$�#��n��f�$�#�g��*��h��m�.��o��fm�.��g��*��h)��p��$�.�� !�"��#$�%��&��'��(��.�m�*��q�p.��j��"�r��kj)&��#*��#�*��"�r��k�s�r��k&�� "��kj�&��6�t�.�3��.��u(��t�tv w��t�!��*��'$��t�!��'$��x��$��+�,��$.��j��o��*��v�$��j�y��)�$��*�� +�,��uy��j�.�$��+v��)��1(6�6��i��+��1��"�&xq��3��'%�$#'��y��i�� !�j�$��)p� �.�%��)��$��w��t��#.�k��,$�2� ��$zT=]T;E�{@;?KXQ|QQ}QQ~P~\~�;::;ITE9C:YOJB;<�_9:;K<Y�aNdeHBJI��5��>K9S��>K:9=c�aNde�URHBJI��5��aNde�VW�M_z�dd{Hcc:��5��J>EZR�WJEc<K9BHcBS��(��M_zaNdeHcBS��6��

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-K

�� !��"�#� �$%��&��'�� (�� )� �*�+��(��, �- �.

��/%��+��$��0�-1��)��+�2��31/�2%��+ 1��2/��%��1�%��4��5))6��67�7��6�2%��/�1�%��4��5)). ��

89:;<<=>?@�A;>B;C�DE9:;<<=>?@FG;>B;CHIJHKCLM?9CB;�N:9E�OJH�PQHR�JS�PQ:T�UVMW�XNCB=Y:>@Z[\�E99:KC?�:J�]9�T9<B�JC�[:T_9I9E]9>�RR[�Z�aT;>bT;CB�NYc;:�dG:�e:B�89:;<<=>?@�A;>B;C�f��$��&g�� +�� h i��*�+��5��j�k�� ++g�� %$ ��g��+��+ / ��&g�� +�� +��+//��g��+��%�� %� � 7�g��+��l-�% 3 g��+��l%3� ��+�g��+��%�� g��+�� $/� &g��+��/% �g ��+��+%��g& ��+��%-%� � �+�g��+��/�+ �� )�g��+��%��l� g��+��-�&��g& ��+�� -�m+//��g��+��"+��l�/��n��fl�/��g��+��h�� % $��o��f % $�g�� +�� h*��p��%�/�� !��"�#� �$%��&��'�� (�� )�� /��l�+�� q�p/� �� j� ��#�r��kj*'�� $+�� $� +��#�r��k�s�r��k'��!�� #��kj�'� ��6�t�/�3��/� ��u)��t�tv!w��t�"��+ ��(%�� t�"��(%��x��%��, �- ��%/��j��n��+��v�%��j�y��*�%��+��!�� , �- ��uy �� j��/�%��,v��*��)6�6��i��,��#�'xq��3�� (&�%$(�� !�/�� r$��%�k -%�2�!��%zT=]T;E�{@;?KXQ|QQ}QQ~P~\R�;::;ITE9C:YVNM�XR\HcBS��7��MCC9�=>9HcBS��5��

Expansion of Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB – 6 MW & AFBC – 12 MW) at Village- Hesla,

P.O.- Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand

MoEF&CC F.No. - J-11011/41/2013-IA.II(I)

Brief Write-Up (Environment Clearance) (Agenda No. 49.2)

1. M/s. Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd has made an online application vide proposal no. IA/JH/IND/236898/2020 dated 03.11.2021 along with copy of EIA/EMP report, Form – 2 and Certified compliance report seeking Environment Clearance (EC) under the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 for the project mentioned above. The proposed project activity is listed at 3(a) Metallurgical Industries under Category “A” of the schedule of the

EIA Notification, 2006 and will be appraised at Central Level.

2. The details of ToR are provided below:

Date of Application Consideration Details

Date of Accord ToR Validity

25.04.2018

36th Meeting of EAC (Violation)

held on 22.09.2020

Terms of Reference

recommended 09.11.2020 08/11/2024

3. The project of M/s Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd located in village - Hesla, P.O. - Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand is for enhancement of Production of Sponge Iron from 0.06 to 0.12 million tons per annum (MTPA), Production of 0.108 MTPA Billets, production of 0.09 MTPA Rolled products along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB – 6 MW & AFBC – 12 MW).

4. Environmental site settings

Sl. No.


1 Total land 14.38 ha [Private:14.38 ha] Land Use: Industrial

2

Land acquisition details as per MoEF&CC O.M. dated 7/10/2014

Land has been acquired and documents are provided in the EIA

3

Existence of habitation & involvement of R&R, if any.

Not applicable

4

Latitude and Longitude of all corners of the project site.

Point Latitude Longitude

A 23039‟00.0”N 850

27‟48.8”E

B 23038‟53.5”N 850

27‟42.8”E

C 23038‟50.3”N 850

27‟45.0”E

D 23038‟44.0”N 850

27‟39.4”E

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-L




Sl. No.


E 23039‟46.1”N 850

27‟54.3”E

F 23038‟51.2”N 850

27‟55.5”E

G 23038‟53.5”N 850

27‟52.9”E

H 23038‟57.4”N 850

27‟54.9”E

5 Elevation of the project site

335 m above mean sea level

6 Involvement of Forest land, if any

No Involvement of Forest

7

Water body (Rivers, Lakes, Pond, Nala, Natural Drainage, Canal etc.) exists within the project site as well as study area

Project Site: No water bodies within the project site Study area

Water Body

Distance Direction

River Damodar

0.3 km South

HFL Details for the Site: The project site level is 335 meters above MSL which is higher than the HFL (316.68 meters) of River Damodar reported on 09/1976 at G&D Site, CWC, Naisarai, Ramgarh Cantt as per Letter obtained from Dept of Water Resources, CWC, Damodar Division

8

Existence of ESZ/ ESA/ national park/ wildlife sanctuary/ biosphere reserve/ tiger reserve/ elephant reserve etc. if any within the study area

None within 10 km radius study area

5. The existing project was accorded Consent to Establish vide lr.no. N-8 dated 31.07.2003. The Existing unit doesn‟t require prior Environmental Clearance as per EIA Notification

1994, since the project cost was less than 100 Crores. Later on, JIPL has installed 2x100 TPD DRI Kilns and 2x12 T Induction furnace along with 2 strands of 6/11m billet caster in the year 2006 without obtaining prior environmental clearance as per EIA Notification, 2006, Hence, violation of EIA Notification. Consent to Operate for the existing non-violating units was accorded by Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board vide lr. no. JSPCB/HO/RNC/CTO-8096413/2020/1706 dated 10.10.2020. The validity of CTO is up to 30.09.2021.




6. Implementation status of the existing EC – Not applicable as there is no EC for the existing project

7. The unit configuration and capacity of existing and proposed project is given as below:

Project Details

Existing Units Proposed Units Total Capacity

Non-Violating Units

Violating Units

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Sponge Iron Plant (DRI Kilns)

2x100 TPD

60,000 2x100 TPD

60,000 - - 4x100 TPD

120,000

Steel Melting Shop Induction Furnace

-- -- 2x12 Ton

1x12 Ton

3x12 Ton

Billet Caster

-- -- 2x6/11 72,000 1x6/11 36,000 3x6/11 108,000

Rolling Mill

-- -- -- -- 90,000 90,000

Power Plant WHRB AFBC

-- -- -- -- 4 1

6 MW 12 MW

4 1

6 MW 12 MW

8. The details of the raw material requirement for the proposed expansion project along with its source and mode of transportation is given as below

Raw Material

Raw Material

Source Distance

(w.r.t. Plant)

Mode of Transport Existing

(TPA)

Existing Violating

(TPA)

Proposed (TPA)

Total after

expansion (TPA)

Iron Ore 102,000 102,000 - 204,000

Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt Ltd, Odisha,

170 km.

Rail

10 -15 km.

Coal 84,000 84,000 70,000 238,000

CCL, Saunda,

18 km. 10 -15 km.

Dolomite 3,000 3,000 - 6,000 Local Market 50 km.




Scrap / Revert Scrap

- 16,500 8,250 24,750 Local

Market, 20 km.

9. Total Water requirement of the proposed plant and for the existing plant is 2906 KLD and

shall be met from Damodar River. Water will be received at the plant through a rising main from the river. Permission for drawl of 0.65 MGD (2955KLD) from Damodar River has been obtained from Damodar Valley Corporation vide letter no MRO/Tariff Cell/JIPL/66 dated 04/02/2019

10. Power requirement for operation of the existing plant is 10.5 MW (Non-violating + Violating). Power is being sourced from Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) and JSEB. Permission of the same has been obtained. Power requirement after the proposed expansion will be met from 18 MW Captive Power Plant

11. Baseline Environmental Studies

Period 1st Oct 2020 to 31st of Dec 2020 Additional study (if

any) AAQ parameters at 8 Locations (min and max)

PM10 = 87.2 to 95.8 μg/m3 PM2.5 = 48.6 to 56.8 μg/m3 SO2 = 27.5 to 36.8 μg/m3 NOx = 40.8 to 54.8 μg/m3 CO = 0.84 to 1.45 μg/m3

--

Incremental GLC level

PM10 = 96.51 μg/m3 (Project Site) PM2.5 = 56.78 μg/m3 (Project Site) SO2 = 37.05 μg/m3 (Project Site) NOx = 54.92 μg/m3 (Project Site)

--


pH: 7.15 to 7.62, Total Hardness: 185 to 235.1 mg/l, Chlorides: 50 to 61 mg/l, Fluoride: 0.22 to 0.38 mg/l. Zinc: 0.39 to 1.42 mg/l

--


pH: 7.42 to 7.68, DO: 4.61 to 5.20 mg/l BOD: 6 to 10 mg/l. COD: 24 to 30 mg/l

--

Noise levels Leq (Day and Night)

45.1 to 69.9 dB(A) for the day time and 34.9 to 56.6 dB(A) for the Night time

--


Traffic study has been conducted at SH-2 and MDR-106 which are approximately 0.5 and 3.5 km from the plant site. Existing PCU and level of service (LOS) is:

--




Road V

(Volume in PCU/hr)

C (Capacity in

PCU/hr)

Existing V/C Ratio

LOS

MDR 2000.5 15000 0.13 A

SH-2 3591 15000 0.24 B

After Expansion the LOS will be

Road V

(Volume in PCU/hr)

C (Capacity in

PCU/hr)

Existing V/C Ratio

LOS

MDR 2072.5 15000 0.14 A

SH-2 3663 15000 0.24 B

M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt Ltd has submitted an application to East Central Railways, Barkakana vide letter dated 24.08.2021 for starting the work for construction of common user railway siding. In future, on completion of the work, the material will be transported by Railways. This will help in reducing the existing vehicular traffic on MDR-106 for transportation of Raw Material and Product.

Flora and fauna There is no Schedule-1 Species of Flora and Fauna in the study area --

12. The details of solid and hazardous waste generation along with its mode of treatment/disposal is furnished as below

S.N

Type of Waste

Source Name

Quantity in TPA Treatment Before

Disposal

Mode of Disposal

Agreement Details for Disposal

Non-Violating

Violating Proposed

1. Dolochar DRI Kiln 15,000 15,000 -- -- In-House

AFBC Boiler

MOU with Inland Power

2. Dedusting

Dust DRI Kiln 11,040 11,040 -- --

Sold to Sinter Plant

MOU with Narsingh

Ispat

3. Wet

Scrapper Sludge

DRI Kiln 1,800 1,800 -- -- Non-

hazardous. Land filling

--

4. Slag Induction Furnace

-- 11,000 5,500

Metal recovery approx.

10%

Remaining slag,

crushed and used as

aggregate

--

file:///C:/Users/VCOMGGM104/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word/MOU%20Dolochar.pdf



file:///C:/Users/VCOMGGM104/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word/Narsingh%20Ispat.pdf









S.N

Type of Waste

Source Name


Disposal

Mode of Disposal


Non-Violating

Violating Proposed

5. Sludge Venturi

Scrubber --

2,200 (In dry

condition)

1,100 (In dry

condition) --


MOU with Narsingh

Ispat

6. Scale CCM -- 500 250 -- Sold to

Sinter Plant

MOU with Narsingh

Ispat

7. Mill Scales Rolling

Mill -- -- 600 --


MOU with Narsingh

Ispat

8. Fly-ash

from WHRB

CPP -- -- 27500 -- Sold to Cement

Plant

MOU with Durga

Cement

9. Fly-ash

from AFBC


Plant

MOU with Durga

Cement

10 Bottom

Ash from AFBC

CPP -- -- 10500 --

Sold to Brick kiln

manufacturing

--

13. Public Consultation

Details of advertisement given 01.04.2017

Date of public consultation 06.05.2017

Venue Panchayat Bhawan, Village and P.O. Marar, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand

Presiding Officer Additional Collector

Major issues raised Employment for Locals Pollution control measures Medical facility Safe drinking water

14. Action plan as per MoEF&CC O.M. dated 30/09/2020

S.No. Activities Amount Rs.

1st

Year 2nd

Year Total

1 Community Development Installation of one number of

bore-well based on Solar

3,068,360 [Complete

- 3,068,360







FLY%20ASH.pdf

FLY%20ASH.pdf

FLY%20ASH.pdf

FLY%20ASH.pdf

FLY%20ASH.pdf

NOC%20Borewell.pdf

NOC%20Borewell.pdf




S.No. Activities Amount Rs.

1st

Year 2nd

Year Total Pump system along with water

storage Tank each in Village

Hesla and Mahuatand,

District: Ramgarh

installation of

bore-well having

pump based on

Solar power and

water storage

tanks] Greenbelt of 15m width,

covering an area of 0.45 ha.

will be developed along the

periphery of the village

Argada, District: Ramgarh,

Jharkhand

450,000.00 [Greenbelt

Development

along the

periphery of

Argada Village]

- 450,000

2 Health Development

Establishment of 16 Bedded

Hospital with advance

medical facilities with

affordable and quality services

in village & P.O Marar,

District: Ramgarh

4,278,631 [Civil work for

two floor

building]

8,222,479 [Hospital

equipment, Lift,

Furniture,

Electrification,

Air Conditioner,

etc]

12,501,110.0

Grand Total in Lakhs 16,019,470.0

15. Existing capital cost of project was 54.12 Cr. (Non-violating + Violating). The capital cost of the proposed project is Rs. 186.63 Crores and the capital cost for environmental protection measures along with the budget of activities to address Public Hearing Issues is proposed as Rs. 5.7011 Crores. The annual recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures is proposed as Rs 0.475 Crores. The employment generation from the proposed project / expansion is 394. The details of cost for environmental protection measures are as follows.

Sl. No.

Description of Item Existing (Rs. in lakhs) Capital Cost Recurring Cost

1 Air Pollution Control/ Noise Management 259.32 15.5

2 Water Pollution Control 68.0 6.0

3 Solid Waste / Hazardous Waste Management 4.0 1.5

4 Environmental Monitoring and Management 11.0 11.0

5 Green Belt Development 49.60 2.0

6 OH & S 18.0 11.5

7 Addressal of Public Consultation concerns 160.19 --

Total 570.11 47.5

NOC%20Borewell.pdf

NOC%20Borewell.pdf

NOC%20Hospital.pdf

NOC%20Hospital.pdf




16. Existing green belt has been developed in 1.54 ha area which is about 10.7 % of the total project area of 14.38 ha with total sapling of 2000 trees. Proposed greenbelt will be developed in 4.22 ha which is about 29.3 % of the total project area. Thus total of 5.76 ha area (40 % of total project area) will be developed as greenbelt. A 3 m wide greenbelt, consisting of at least 3 tiers around plant boundary will be developed as greenbelt and green cover as per CPCB/MoEF&CC, New Delhi guidelines. Local and native species will be planted with a density of 2500 trees per hectare. Total no. of 14400 saplings will be planted and nurtured in 5.76 hectares in three years.

17. Summary of Violation under EIA Notification,2006

2x100 TPD DRI Kiln and 2x12T Induction Furnace units of the project were installed without prior environmental clearance therefore the proposal attracts provisions of S.O. 804 (E) issued by MoEF&CC dated 14.03.2017 for the projects under Violation.

Chronology of the events under violation is given below:

M/s Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited (JIPL) has established 2x100 TPD Sponge

Iron Plant at Village Hesla, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand after

obtaining CTE from Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board (JSPCB) on

31.07.2003. Environmental clearance for installation of the Plant, as per EIA

Notification 1994, was not required as the project cost was less than 100 Crores.

JIPL installed another 2 x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant

(2x12 Ton Induction Furnace with Billet caster) after obtained CTE from JSPCB on

06.11.2006

JSPCB issued Consent to Operate (CTO) for operation of all installed Units till

30.09.2012. At the time of renewal of CTO for the period 01.10.2012 to

30.09.2013, JSPCB directed the proponent to stop operation of the 2x100 TPD

Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billet Plant installed during 2006 till

Environmental Clearance is obtained. JSPCB granted CTO for the period

01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013 only for operation of 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant,

installed during the year 2003.

JIPL submitted application on 11.01.2013 for grant of TOR for obtaining EC vide

letter no. JIPL/1124/12-13 on for 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS

Billet Plant which are under violation and 1x12 Ton Induction Furnace, 90,000

TPA Rolling Mill & 12 MW Power Plant under expansion.

Proposal was considered in 7th Reconstituted EAC Meeting of MoEF&CC on

04.04.2013 and as the proposal is for violation, MoEF&CC vide letter dated

12.06.2013 directed JIPL to submit compliance as per OM dated 12/12/2012. JIPL

submitted the Board Resolution and Credible action to MoEF&CC on 04.01.2014.

The proposal was considered in 31st Reconstituted EAC meeting held on




08.01.2015 and again on 1st EAC Meeting held on 20.11.2015 and TOR for the

project was recommended. MoEF&CC vide letter dated 08.01.2016 granted TOR.

Public Hearing for the project was held on 06.05.2017. FINAL EIA was submitted

to MoEF&CC on 25.04.2018. EDS issued by MoEF&CC on 17.01.2019 mentioned;

“The proposal is involved Violation for EIA Notification, 2006. Therefore, you are

requested to make application under violation after issue of such notification for

dealing of violation proposals”. The proposal was delisted from theMinistry’s

website on 07.06.2019.

JIPL requested MoEF&CC to relist the project and transfer the same to the

violation committee as ‘Lateral Proposal Entry’, as per MoEF&CC OM 09/09/2019.

The Expert Appraisal Committee (Violation) deliberated the project during its

36th meeting held on 21.09.2020 and recommended for grant of TOR. Terms of

Reference for the proposed project was granted by MoEF&CC on 09.11.2020 vide

F.No. J-11011/41/2013-IA-II(I).

M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt Ltd. has made an online EC application vide proposal no.

IA/JH/IND/212892/2020 dated 03/06/2021 along with copy of EIA/EMP report

and Form –2.

The Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) deliberated the project during its

40th meeting held on 15th July, 2021 and raised some observations along with

additional details.

ADS reply along with revised Form 2 and EIA report was submitted through an

online EC application vide proposal no. IA/JH/IND/236898/2020 dated on

03.11.2021

The details of Court Cases are provided below:

Detail of

Court Cases Case1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Name of the

court High Court of

Jharkhand,

Ranchi

District Court

of Ramgarh District Court of

Hazaribagh High Court of

Jharkhand,

Ranchi Name of the

Sub-court - Chief Judicial

Magistrate,

Ramgarh

Chief Judicial

Magistrate,

Hazaribagh

-

Case No. W.P.(C) No. 1125

of 2014

Complaint

case No.

255/2021

Complaint case

No. 331/2013

Cr. M.P. No. 760

of 2014

HC%20case%201125-2014%20(24.03.2014).pdf

HC%20case%201125-2014%20(24.03.2014).pdf

Credible%20Action_JIPL.pdf



Hazaribagh%20Court%20case%20(331.pdf

Hazaribagh%20Court%20case%20(331.pdf

HC%20760-2014.pdf

HC%20760-2014.pdf

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight




Detail of

Court Cases Case1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Orders /

Directions of

the court, if

any and its

relevance

with the

proposed

project

The writ is

pending for final

disposal.

Meanwhile

Hon‟ble High

Court has passed

interim order on

24.03.2014 for

stay on clause no.

27 of Consent To

Operate of JSPCB

dated 10.12.2012,

allowing the PP to

operate the

expanded part of

unit.

Case has been

filed on

25.03.2021 to

initiate

credible

action against

the project

proponent

and next

hearing date

is scheduled

07.10.2022.

Case has been

filed on

21.12.2013 to

initiate credible

action against

the project

proponent and

next hearing

date is scheduled

28.01.2022.

The writ is

pending for final

disposal.

Meanwhile

Hon‟ble High

Court has

passed interim

order on

08.05.2014 for

stay on arrest of

project

proponent in

connection with

Complaint case

no. 331/2013 .

Case Details Writ petition filed

against clause no.

27 of Consent to

Operate issued by

Jharkhand State

Pollution Control

Board on

10.12.2012 asking

the unit to stop the

operation of

expanded part

(2x100TPD DRI

Kiln and 240TPD

Billet Plant)

Case has been

filed for the

offence

committed u/s

15 of

Environment

(Protection)

Act, 1986

cognizance u/s

19 of

Environment

(Protection)

Act, 1986 in

compliance of

MoEF & CC

TOR letter J-11011/41/2013-IA.II(I) dated

09.11.2020

Case has been

filed for the

offence

committed u/s

15 of

Environment

(Protection)

Act, 1986

cognizance u/s

19 of

Environment

(Protection)

Act, 1986 in

compliance of

MoEF & CC

letter J-11011/41/2013-IA.II(I) dated

12.06.2013.

Writ petition

filed on

11.03.2014

related to stay

on proceedings

of the

complaint case

331 of 2013 in

the Chief

Judicial

Magistrate,

Hazaribagh

against the

project

proponent.

18. Name of the EIA consultant: Vardan EnviroNet [S.No. 37 in List of ACOs with their Certificate / Extension Letter no., Rev. 09, April 12, 2021].

19. Certified Compliance Report from Regional Office: Not applicable

VCOMGGM104

Highlight




20. ADS Information in chronology

M/s. Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd made an online application vide proposal no. IA/JH/IND/212892/2020 dated 03.06.2021. The proposal was initially considered in 40th meeting of Re-constituted EAC (Industry-1) held on 15.07.2021. Proposal was deferred for want of additional information.

The proponent submitted the ADS reply vide letter dated 31.10.2021 along with Revised Form-2 and EIA report uploaded on PARIVESH on 03.11.2021 Point-wise reply of ADS is given as below

S. No

ADS POINTS REPLY

1. Water balance diagram for DRI shall be checked and corrected. The water balance diagram for monsoon season shall be submitted and explained.

Water balance diagram for DRI is corrected and revised water balance diagram for the monsoon and non-monsoon period is provided in Section 2.7.2 of Chapter 2 in EIA Report.

2. In transportation study report, the Level Of Service (LOS) in MDR-106 is „D‟ which has to be improved by

working out alternate route or by other measures to bring the LOS to at least B.

The Level of Service (LOS) and the capacity of the Roadway segments has been now revised as per the Indian Roads Congress (IRC) standards sourced from Guidelines for Capacity of Roads in Plain Areas IRC 64-1990. Under existing traffic load on MDR the Level of Service falls under category „A‟ which implies to road with

„Excellent‟ performance. Due to increased production at M/s JIPL after the expansion, there will be increase in the traffic to and from the site. M/s JIPL has decided to adopt Railways as an alternate mode for transport of Raw Material and product. This will help in reducing the existing vehicular traffic on MDR-106 for transportation of Raw Material and Product and will also avoid any additional load on the existing traffic scenario. Details are provided in EIA Section 4.5.6 of Chapter-4.

3. In Public Hearing Grievances one of the main requirements raised was to reduce dust impact in nearby villages which needs to be addressed by an action plan like providing greenbelt/thick plantation –

In order to address the public hearing concern to reduce the dust impact in the nearby villages, greenbelt of 15m width, covering an area of 0.45 ha. with tree density of 2500 trees/ha., comprising of trees with medium and large canopy will be developed along the periphery of




S. No

ADS POINTS REPLY

surrounding nearby villages like Argada, eski, etc. A detailed study of these areas to be conducted to find out the requirements to mitigate the same and the budgetary provision with specific quantity and period shall be incorporated.

the village Argada. Detailed action plan of greenbelt development in the Argada village is provided in Section 7.4 of Chapter 7 in EIA Report.

4. Details of management of effluent and storm water during monsoon to be furnished.

Detailed effluent management and storm water management during monsoon period is provided in Section 4.6.2.2, 4.12 & 4.13 of Chapter 4 in EIA Report.

5. Action plan for greenbelt development needs to be revised as the density proposed for greenbelt is 1500 trees per ha which is not as per CPCB norms.

Revised action plan for greenbelt development in 5.76 Ha area (40% of the plant area) within the plant premises, with tree density of 2500 trees/hectare with capital budget of Rs. 49.60 lakhs is provided in Section 4.11 of Chapter 4 in EIA Report.

6. PM10 at site, Argada and Sirka in post project scenario shall exceed 100µg/m3 under worst case scenario. No specific EMP has been suggested to bring it down.

M/s JIPL has proposed a three way management plan to deal with failure scenario i). Developed On-site and Off-Site Emergency Management Plan to deal with worst case scenario ii). Provision of Vehicle mounted Fog Canon system iii). Ambulance with latest medical facilities stationed within the plant to deal with medical emergencies. The detailed implementation plan is provided in Section 4.5.5.1 of Chapter 4 & in Section 7.11 of chapter 7 of EIA Report.

7. AAQ modeling shall be again carried out as same mixing height is used for day and night time which is not correct.

AAQ Modeling is provided in Section 4.5.3 of Chapter 4 in EIA Report. On comparing the mixing height values used for Air Quality Modelling by Aermod Software with those obtained from secondary source (Urban Emission) were found to have variation of 16.66%. Hence, it can be said that the mixing height data is consistent.

8. Damage Assessment Report a) Lump sum Cost taken for topsoil

damage of quantity 25100cum to Revised Damage Assessment Report updating all the corrections is provided as Chapter 13 of




S. No

ADS POINTS REPLY

be revised by assigning unit cost per cum (i.e Rs. 15 per cum) against total quantity

EIA Report.

b) Table 13.5 to be revised and damage due to emission of Sox & NOx during construction to be included. Details of equipment / machinery operating hours, working hours per day, vehicle lead distance, total open area/non constructed area under impact of wind erosion and fuel consumption to be included.

c) Emission from all sources and for total production since 2006 to be considered for calculation of impact due to air emission. Emission from material handling, internal transportation and impact of wind erosion from stockyard to be included for calculation of total impact.

d) Monetary value in Table 13.13 to be corrected as per revised total emission under controlled environment.

e) Rainwater runoff to be revised based on specific land use runoff coefficient for different types of land cover, covering total plot area for both construction and operation period.

f) For compensation of rainwater loss, total cost of construction of RWH structures shall be taken as damage cost. Cost of RWH structure can be referred from respective state guidelines.

g) Table 13.9 to be revised as per




S. No

ADS POINTS REPLY

standard water requirement of not less than 1KL per 1Sqm constructed area for total area of 2.97Ha and water usage for other activities to be included as per water balance table apart from DRI Kiln and Induction Furnace with CCM for complete operation period since 2006.

h) The damage cost taken for noise to be revised and damage to be calculated as per CPCB guidelines/ Noise rules 200 and NGT directions on same.

i) The damage cost taken for biodiversity and crop damage to be revised as per Indian standards and reference.

j) The damage cost taken against gap plantation to be revised @2500 trees per hectare.

k) The amount allotted against PH grievance as per OM dated 30.09.2020 should be worked out considering greenbelt/thick plantation for nearby two villages as mentioned above and to be included in EMP Cost.

The revised EMP for the proposed project including the amount allotted for implementing the activities to address PH issues (including greenbelt/thick plantation in nearby villages) is provided in Table No. 10.1 of Chapter 10 in EIA Report.

l) The activities and corresponding cost proposed under Remediation Plan, Natural and Community Resource Augmentation Plan to be revised and actual cost as per market standards to be included for the same. The proposed activity to each village needs to be quantified.

The action plan for the activities to be carried under the Remediation Plan and Natural & Community Resource Augmentation Plan along with yearly budget provisions has been revised and is provided in Table No. 20, 21 & 22 of Revised Damage Assessment Report is provided as Table No. 13.23, 13.24 & 13.25 of Chapter 13 in EIA Report. The activities proposed are with specific time period and monitorable.

m) The activities under the above shall be specific with time period




S. No

ADS POINTS REPLY

of years and monitorable. 9. Argada Village is 200m from site in

west. Raw material yard is located adjacent to boundary facing the village. Hesla village is 400m from the site in east. Environmental safeguards to be adopted have not been mentioned.

M/s JIPL has proposed to install 22 numbers of fixed water sprinklers along the boundary wall within the plant premises towards Argada and Hesla villages. The detailed implementation plan along with the budget provision is provided in Section 4.5.5.2 of Chapter 4 of EIA Report.

10. Table number 3.16, 3.17 & 3.18 of EIA report pertaining to analysis of soil samples, land use pattern, villages selected for socio-economic survey needs to be revised and corrected.

Soil sampling location table has been provided with the type of land use of the sampling locations. Interpretation based of the soil sample analysis has been provided as interpretation in Section 3.3.5 of Chapter 3 in EIA Report. Summarized details of the Opinion and Expectation of the respondents in the villages during the Socio-economic survey are provided in Section 3.3.8.7 of Chapter 3 in EIA Report.

11. Damodar river is located at a distance of 0.3km from the project site in the southern direction. Authenticated HFL details of the river, protection measures to be adopted along river side and impact on the riverine ecology has not been submitted.

The project site level is 335meters above MSL which is higher than the HFL (316.68m) of River Damodar reported on 09/1976 at G&D Site, CWC, Naisarai, Ramgarh Cantt as per Letter obtained from Dept of Water Resources, CWC, Damodar Division and; The detailed information of riverine ecology of river Damodar along with the impact of proposed project on river and the mitigation measures proposed are provided in attached Annexure-XII of EIA Report.

21 The Damage to the environment due to the various aspects of the environment

during construction and operation phase of the violation project was assessed

and the total damage cost was evaluated. The Damage Remediation Plan is

proposed at the estimated cost of Rs. 433.069 Lakhs and Natural Resource

Augmentation Plan and Community Resource Augmentation Plan are proposed

at Rs. 69.0 and 60.16 Lakhs respectively. Hence, the damage cost is estimated at

Rs. 562.29 Lakhs for Remediation Plan and Natural and Community Resource

Augmentation Plan.




Summarized Total Damage Remediation plan Budget

A. Environment Damage Cost (in Rs. Lakhs)

Air Environment 38.78

Water Environment 339.62

Noise Environment 9.864

Land Environment 38.705

Biological Environment 6.10

Damage Cost Evaluated 433.069

B. Profit Share from Violation Production (in Rs. Lakhs)

3% of Profit earned from violation production as directed by EAC 31.30

C. Expenditure saved on Environment Management (in Rs. Lakhs)

Expenditure saved on recurring cost of EMP in violation period 97.86

Total cost of Damage assessment [A+B +C] 562.229

Expansion of Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd. for enhancement of Sponge Iron Production from 60,000 to 120,000 TPA, Billet Production 108,000 TPA, 90,000 TPA Rolling Mill along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB – 6 MW & AFBC – 12

MW) at Village- Hesla, P.O.- Argada, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand


Damage Assessment and Remediation Plan along with Yearly Budget for Remediation Plan




1

Land Environment

1. Assistance to farmers by providing seedlings, manure and Bio-fertilizers to villagers of Hesla and Maraar = Rs.46,000/-

2. Providing one tractors (Make Mahindra) with hydraulic trolley and Rotavator to be provided to each Nagar panchayat of village Hesla and Maraar = Rs. 34,00,000/-

3. Providing Bund maker, Ridger, plough for agriculture purpose to villagers of Hesla and Maraar = Rs. 4,24,500/-

19,35,250 (Providing

Tractor, Bund maker, Ridger,

Plough and Seedlings,

manure in Nagar panchayat of

Hesla)

19,35,250 (Providing

Tractor, Bund maker, Ridger,

Plough and Seedlings, manure in

Nagar panchayat of

Maraar)

--

38,70,500

2

Air Environment

1. Providing four E-Rickshaw (4 seater, Make: Mac Auto) with charger for public transport in each Barkakana, Maraar, Phulsarai and Argada villages = Rs 25,00,000/-

2. Solar stove, solar street light & solar fan in Argada & Hesala village = Rs. 13,78,000/-

12,50,000

(Providing 4 E-Ricksaw each in Barkakana and Maraar

villages)

12,50,000

(Providing 4 E-Ricksaw each in

Phulsarai and Argada

villages)

13,78,000

(Solar stove, solar street light & solar fan in

Argada & Hesala village)

38,78,000

3

Water Environment

1. Drinking water plant (10 nos) including borewell with solar power with water cooler including RO & UV in Argada & Hesala village.- Rs 1,50,00,000/-

1,68,00,000

(Drinking

water plant (10 nos) including

1,02,00,000

(Renovation of Ponds (Includes

Cleaning/

69,63,000

(Construction of Covered Drainage

3,39,63,000






1st Year 2nd Year 3rd year Total 2. Sewage treatment plant in village

Hesla Rs 50,00,000/- 3. Rain water harvesting pit (@ Rs. 3

lakhs/location) at Panchayat office of Hesla, Argada, Barkakana, Manuan, Maraar and Phulsarai villages = Rs.18,00,000/

4. Renovation of Ponds (Includes Cleaning/ desiltation, concrete Lining) and construction of wharf and platforms in pond located in each of Argada, Hesla, Manuan, and Maraar villages (Rs. 2,500,000 x 4 + 200,000) = Rs. 1,02,00,000/-

5. Construction of Covered Drainage system along with sewage pits within village Hesla = Rs. 19,63,000 /-

borewell with solar power with water

cooler including RO

& UV in Argada &

Hesala village

& Rain water

harvesting pit at Panchayat

office of Hesla, Argada,

Barkakana, Manuan,

Maraar and Phulsarai villages)

desiltation, concrete

Lining) and construction of

wharf and platforms in

pond located in each of Argada, Hesla, Manuan,

and Maraar villages)

system along with sewage pit within village

Hesla &

Sewage treatment plant

in village Hesla)

4

Noise Environment

1. Providing ENT clinic along with Doctor in Hesla and Argada villages = Rs 4,86,000/-

2. Distribution of Hearing aids to the needed Sr. Citizens of the Hesla, Maraar and Argada villages @ 1000 x 500 person = Rs. 5,00,000/-

4,86,000

(Providing ENT specialist

clinic along with Doctor in

Hesla and Argada

villages)

5,00,000

(Distribution of Hearing aids to the needed Sr. Citizens of the Hesla, Maraar

and Argada villages)

-- 9,86,000

5 Biological Environment

1. Funds for conservation of fauna in Phulsarai Protected forest to the

6,10,000 (Funds for

--

-- 6,10,000






1st Year 2nd Year 3rd year Total District Forest Office = Rs. 6,10,000/

conservation of fauna residing

in Naisarai Protected

forest) Total 2,10,81,250 1,38,85,250 83,41,000 4,33,07,500





Sl. No. Proposed Activities

Budget (Rs.)

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year Total

1

Installation of Bio-degradable waste converter (Make: Reddonatura, Capacity: 75 kg/day) in Argada, Manuan and Hesla village

10,00,000 (Argada)

10,00,000 (Manuan)

10,00,000 (Hesla)

30,00,000

2 Cattle food processing plant with veterinary hospital at Hesla villages

10,00,000

5,00,000

-- 15,00,000

3 Biogas plant in Manuan, Barkakana and Maraar village

8,00,000 (Manuan)

8,00,000 (Barkakana)

8,00,000 (Maraar)

24,00,000

Total 28,00,000 23,00,000 18,00,000 69,00,000


Sl. No.


1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year Total

1. Oxygen plant at Hesla village

30,00,000 30,00,000 16,000 60,16,000

Summary of Remediation Plan, Natural Resource Augmentation Plan and Community Resource Augmentation Plan

S.No. Aspects Budget (Rs. in Lakhs)

1. Estimated Cost on remediation plan based on the damage assessment due to violation

433.075

2. Natural resource augmentation plan for 3 years 69.0

3. Community resource augmentation plan for 3 years 60.16

Total 562.235

-----------

�� !�"�#�$%#��$%�&��'�( �)��*�!�� &�� +�&�,�-�!.

&��!��#��#-�!�!��)��/�01$%��+$2-�3��41��3��-&1��3��!!��1!��52��6�%6��26�7+66�7�$63��!��1!��52��6�%6��26�. ��

89:;<<=>?@�A;>B;C�DE9:;<<=>?@FG;>B;CHIJHKCLM9N<@�JO�PQR9>G;:KJCR�OJ>�S?9CB;�T:9E�UJH�VWHX�JO�VW:Y�MZS[�\TCB=R:>@]_�E99:KC?Y9<B�JC� :Y�a9I9EQ9>�XbX�]�cY;>dY;CB�TRN;:�eG:�f:B�gKN<�f9?;<�hi��j�!��#-�!k l)��,�-��m�l��n) ��! �& �h�#�) ��j �-#� k'-��)�� h!��)��j�� #-�#� k��) ��2j�!��#-�!�� &)��o��h �&)�j�� #-�#� kn��pq��rst�uvwxyvwz{�|t}w~��x��w~��~�{��u|��vwt��t~w��tv�{��p��}�z��|x�z��wz~�w~��w��t�w��q�q��x�w{w��t~x��~��w��wxv��uvwxyvwz{�w�~�x��~w�z�z��x��uvwxyvwz{��~w~��~��z��z~x��wx{��u��z��pq��q��q��z��x�z��z~w��wxwz��x��zt~w��w~��z��~v��wz~��wt�}�x��|��~� ��w~��z�p¡¡¢��£wt�z�~�x�¤��x�{�wt�~v��}x�¥��~��t~�£wt��tt�~vwz�p��x�x�tq��zz��x�¦p��q��u|��zt~w��{�wz�~v�x��p��}�z��|x�z��wz~�wz{��¢��r��~��wz~��p��z|z{��~��z�§�xzw��£�~v��~��wt~�x��w�~�x��~w�z�{��x��u��z��qppq��q��zz��x�¦��q��u��tt��{��zt�z~�~��}�xw~��x��}�xw~��z��w��zt~w��{�©z�~t�~��q�¡q��p�q��x�~v��ª�wx��pp¦��p��zz��x�¦��¢q��~�~v��~��x�z�£w��x�~v��}�x��{��pqp�q��p��~��q�¡q��p��u��{�x��~�{�~v�}x�}�z�z~�~��t~�}��}�xw~��z��~v��p��}�z��|x�z��wz~�wz{��¢��r��~��wz~�zt~w��{�{�x�z��~��z��x�z��z~w��wxwz��t��~w�z�{q�u��xwz~�{��x�~v��}�x��{�pqp�q��p��~��q�¡q��p��z�ª��x��}�xw~��z��p��}�z��|x�z��wz~��zt~w��{�{�x�z��~v�ª�wx��q��zz��x�¦¢�q«¬��®°�±²³³µ�¶�·²¹�²º�»¶¼»¶ºµ�½²¾»�¿ÀÁ¹�ÂÃ�·²¹�Ä¹²¹²Àº�ºÀ¬�ÅÅÆ«ÇÆÈÅÉ�ÊÀËÁ¶Ì»²º¾�ÀÊ�Í¿Î�³¹¹ �µ¶¹µ�ÅÈ¬ÅÆ¬ÆÈÅÆ�ÏÄ¶¹²ÐÁ³¶³Ã�Ð³¶ÁÌ�ºÀ¬�ÆÑ�·»¸ÂÃ�¹»�®°·¶Ì�µ²Ð¹µ�ºÀ¹�¹À�ÀÄ ¶¹�ÆÒÅÈÈ�ÓÔ�ÔÕ®�Ö²³º�¶ºµ�ÆÉÈÓÔ�Î²³³¹�Ð¶Ì¹ ×�¶ºµ�ÀÂ¹¶²º¹»�Ì¹¶Ã�Àµ �µ¶¹µ�Àº�ÆÉ¬ÈØ¬ÆÈÅÉ¬�ÏÙººÒÁ Ú«×¬�Ó»�³¶Ì¹�»¶²º¾�²º�¹»²Ì�Û¶¹¹ �·¶Ì»³µ�Àº�Ø¬ÅÆ¬ÆÈÅÜ�·»¸²º�²¹�·¶Ì�ËÁÀ¹µ�¹»¶¹�Ý°¹�¹»²Ì�Û¶¹¹ �¾À�ÀÁ¹�ÀÊ�ÛÃ�³²Ì¹Þ�¹À�ÂÄ³¶Ðµ�ÂÊÀ �¶ºÀ¹» �ÎºÐ»�·²¹»�Ä²À�¶ÄÄÀß¶³�ÀÊ�½ÀºàÂ³�¹»�¿»²Ê�ÁÌ¹²Ð¬á�Ï¿ÀÄÃ¶¹¹¶Ð»µ�¶Ì�ÙººÒÁ �«×�Ó»�Ì¹¶Ã�Àµ �µ¶¹µ�ÆÉ¬ÈØ¬ÆÈÅÉ�²Ì�Ì¹²³³�ÀÄ ¶¹²ß¬q��v�x��x��~v��z�~t��p��|�â��z��â��z��ã�¢��£wt��z��z~�z��t��}�xw~��z�~��rwx�v��pwz{�~v��p��|z{��~��z�§�xzw��w��z��£�~v��r�£wt��z��}�xw~��z�~��x��pq�q��|z�~v��}x�t�z~w~��z��w{��x��~v��|z{�t~xª¦p��z�pqp�q��p��tw��}�xw~�z��t~w~�t�vwt��z�}x�t�z~�{��z�~v��t��{��z��x�¢��~v��}x�t�z~w~��z��{��w~~w�v�{�wt��zz��x�¦��l& 0��3��'��) ��,��-��ä&�0& �� m��å��#�!��&��ä&�0& �#æç)��è��&�� é�;::;IYE9C:R SCC9ê=>9�HgN9?��7ë

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-M

�� !�"�#�$%#��$%�&��'�( �)��*�!�� &�� +�&�,�-�!.

&��!��#��#-�!�!��)��/�01$%��+$2-�3��41��3��-&1��3��!!��1!��52��6�%6��26�7+66�7�$63��!��1!��52��6�%6��26�. ��

89:;<�8==>9?@A�%2$BC9<D;E�8=F8EFG9?@A��$��BF9:;<�8==G9?@A��$2�BH9�I<�JKLM�FF8HE8=FC�N8C9=G98=FCO9?@A��$$2BG9<D;�8=FFEF89?@A��227B

MoM of 49th meeting of the Re-constituted EAC (Industry-I) held on 16 – 17thDecember, 2021

Page 1 of 175

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change Impact Assessment Division

(Industry-1 Sector)

Date of zero draft MoM sent to Chairman: 22/12/2021 Approval by Chairman: 28/12/2021

Uploading on PARIVESH: 28/12/2021 Summary record of the Forty Ninth (49th) meeting of Re-Constituted Expert Appraisal Committee (REAC) held on 16-17th December, 2021 for environment appraisal of Industry-1 sector projects constituted under the provisions of Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006. The Forty Ninth (49th) meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for Industry-1 Sector constituted as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 for Environment Appraisal of Industry-1 Sector Projects was held on 16-17th December, 2021 in the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) through video conferencing in view of the ongoing Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) pandemic. The list of EAC attendees is as follows:

S. No.

Name Position 16/12/2021 17/12/2021

1. Dr. Chhavi Nath Pandey Chairman Present Present 2. Dr. Kawaljeet Singh,

Director, CPPRI. Member Present Present

3. Dr. Siddharth Singh, Member Present Present 4. Dr. Jagdish Kishwan Member Present Present 5. Dr. Tejaswini Ananth

Kumar Member Absent Absent

6. Dr. G.V. Subramanyam Member Present Present 7. Shri. Ashok Upadhyaya Member Present Present 8. Shri. Rajendra Prasad

Sharma Member Present Present

9. Dr. Sanjay Deshmukh Member Absent Absent 10. Prof. S.K. Singh Member Present Present 11. Dr. R. Gopichandran Member Absent Absent 12. Shri Jagannadha Rao

Avasarala Member Present Present

13. Shri. J.S. Kamyotra Member Present Present Officials from MoEF&CC 14. Shri. Sundar Ramanathan Member

Secretary Present Present

15. Dr. Sandeepan B.S. Scientist ‘B’ Present Present After welcoming the Committee Members, discussion on each of the agenda items was taken up. The minutes of 48th meeting held during 11-12th November, 2021 were confirmed by the EAC as already uploaded on PARIVESH. It was apprised to the EAC that Competent Authority has extended the tenure of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) of Industry 1 sector by three months beyond 12/11/2021 (or) until reconstruction of new EAC, whichever is earlier.

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-N


Page 12 of 175

conditions. The project authorities should extend full cooperation to the officer (s) of the Regional Office by furnishing the requisite data / information/monitoring reports.

xiv. Any appeal against this EC shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

49.2 Sponge Iron Plant (4x100 TPD), Induction furnace (2x12T+1x12T), Rolling Mill (90,000 TPA)

and 18 MW power plant [6 MW WHRB, 2 MW Coal char based and 10 MW Coal based] of M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited located at Hesla, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand [Online Proposal No. IA/JH/IND/236898/2020, File No. J-11011/41/2013-IA-II(I)]– Environment Clearance as per S.O. 804(E) dated 14/03/2017 – regarding.

49.2.1 M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited has made an online application vide proposal no.

IA/JH/IND/236898/2020 dated 15/11/2021 along with copy of EIA/EMP report, Form – 2 and Certified compliance report seeking Environment Clearance (EC) under the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 for the project mentioned above. The proposed project activity is listed at schedule no. 3(a) Metallurgical Industries (ferrous & non-ferrous) under Category “A” of the schedule of the EIA Notification, 2006 and attracts provisions of S.O.

804 (E) issued by MoEF&CC dated 14/03/2017 for the projects under Violation.

49.2.2 The aforesaid proposal was recommended for grant of ToR by the EAC – Violation and accordingly ToR was accorded on 9/11/2020. The proposal for EC is being appraised by the sectoral EAC. With the prior consent of the Chairman, EAC – Industry 1 sector, Shri K. Gowrappan, Environment Expert has been co/opted for appraisal of the instant proposal consideration. However, he could not attend the meeting and his comments/views on Damage Assessment and Remediation Plan was received by email on 16/12/2021. Details submitted by Project proponent

49.2.3 The details of the ToR are furnished as below:

Date of Application Consideration Details Date of Accord

ToR Validity

PP made online application dated 25/04/2018 to (Industry-1). Later on, PP requested the MoEF&CC on 27/11/2019 to transfer the proposal made in EAC (Industry-1) to EAC (Violation) as ‘Lateral Proposal Entry’ as

per MoEF&CC Office Memorandum dated 09/09/2019.

31st EAC (Violation) held on 28th Feb, 2020, 33rd EAC (Violation) held on 18-19th May, 2020, 36th meeting of EAC (Violation) held on 21.09.2020

Terms of Reference recommended

09/11/2020 08/11/2024

49.2.4 The project of M/s. Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd (JIPL) located in village-Hesla, P.O. -Argada,

Ramgarh District, Jharkhand is for enhancement of Production of Sponge Iron from 0.06

VCOMGGM104

Highlight


Page 13 of 175

to 0.12 million tons per annum (MTPA), Production of 0.108 MTPA Billets, production of 0.09 MTPA Rolled products along with 18 MW Captive Power Plant (WHRB – 6 MW & AFBC – 12 MW).

49.2.5 Environmental Site Settings:

S No


1 Total land 14.38 ha

[Private:14.38 ha] Land Use: Industrial

2

Land acquisition details as per MoEF&CC O.M. dated 7/10/2014.

The existing units is installed in 25.54 Acres (10.34 Ha.) of land which is owned by JIPL. Company has taken adjacent land area of 10 Acres (4.04 Ha.) on 30 years lease. Thus, the total land after expansion will be 14.38 ha and total land is under possession of JIPL.

3

Existence of habitation & involvement of R&R, if any.

Project Site: Nil Study area: Habitation Distance Direction Argada Vilage 0.08 km NW MahuwaTand 0.26 East

No R&R is involved.

4

Latitude and Longitude of all corners of the project site.

Point Latitude Longitude A 23039’00.0”N 85027’48.8”E B 23038’53.5”N 85027’42.8”E C 23038’50.3”N 85027’45.0”E D 23038’44.0”N 85027’39.4”E E 23039’46.1”N 85027’54.3”E F 23038’51.2”N 85027’55.5”E G 23038’53.5”N 85027’52.9”E H 23038’57.4”N 85027’54.9”E

5 Elevation of the project site

335 m above mean sea level

6 Involvement of Forest land, if any

No involvement of Forest land.

7

Water body (Rivers, Lakes, Pond, Nala, Natural Drainage, Canal etc.) exists within the project site as well as study area

Project Site: No water bodies within the project site. Study area Water Body Distance Direction River Damodar 0.3 km South

HFL Details for the Site: The project site level is 335 meters above MSL which is higher than the HFL (316.68 meters) of River Damodar reported on 09/1976 at G&D Site, CWC, Naisarai, Ramgarh


Page 14 of 175

S No


Cantt as per Letter obtained from Dept of Water Resources, CWC, Damodar Division.

8

Existence of ESZ/ ESA/ national park/ wildlife sanctuary/ biosphere reserve/ tiger reserve/ elephant reserve etc. if any within the study area

Nil. However, following forests are existing in the study area: PF at 5.0km (SW), PF at 5.5km (NNE), PF at 8.4km (South), PF at 9.2 km (NNW).

49.2.6 Chronology of exiting NOC/ Clearances:

S No

Date NOC/ Clearance

Detail

1. 31/07/2003 NOC* Issued by Jharkhand State pollution Control Board (JSPCB) for Sponge Iron Plant: 200 MT/day (DRI Kiln: 2x100 TPD)

2. 06/11/2006 NOC** Issued by JSPCB for another Sponge Iron unit: 200 MT/day (DRI Kiln: 2x100 TPD) and MS Billets: 240 TPD (IF: 2x12 T with Billet Caster)

3. 24/12/2011 CTO Issue by JSPCB for Sponge Iron/ 4x100 TPD, M.S. Billet/240 TPD.

4. 10/12/2012 CTO*** renewal

Issued for Sponge Iron Plant: 200 MT/day (DRI Kiln: 2x100 TPD).

5. 10/10/2020 CTO renewal Issued for Sponge Iron Plant: 200 MT/day (DRI Kiln: 2x100 TPD) and valid up to 30/09/2021.

Note: * As the project cost was less than 100 Cr., the environmental clearance as per EIA Notification, 1994 was not required.

** PP has been committed Violation under EIA Notification 14th September, 2006. CTO was granted till 31/12/2011.

*** JSPCB directed to PP to give clarification in person to Member Secretary as to why the application for grant of CTO for 2x100 TPD sponge Iron Plant and 240 TPD MS Billets plant installed during 2006 should not be revoked. Thereafter, JSPCB granted CTO only for operation of 2x100 TPD Sponge Iron Plant, installed during the year 2013.

49.2.7 After revoked the facilities under violation by JSPCB during CTO renewal, PP sought for

Environment Clearance for the following: M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited submitted application on 11/01/2013 for grant

of ToR to Obtaining Environmental clearance for the enhancement of sponge iron


Page 15 of 175

production from 60,000 TPA to 120,000 TPA and production of 72,000 TPA MS Billets through already installed 2x100 TPD DRI Kiln and 2x12T Induction Furnace under violation; and for the proposed 1x12T Induction furnace for production of 36,000 TPA MS Billets along with installation of additional 300 TPD Rolling Mill for production of 90,000 TPA TMT bars along with 18MW Captive Power Plant (12MW AFBC & 6 MW WHRB), under expansion.

Proposal was considered in 7th Re-EAC (Industry) held on 04/04/2013 and as the proposal was for violation, MoEF&CC vide letter dated 12/06/2013 directed PP to submit compliance as per OM dated 12/12/2012. Accordingly, PP submitted the Board resolution and credible action to MoEF&CC on 04/01/2014.

Proposal was considered in 31st Re-EAC (Industry) held on 08/01/2015 and again considered on 1st meeting of EAC held on 20/11/2015 and ToR for the project was recommended, subsequently MoEF&CC granted the ToR on 08/01/2016.

After conducting the public hearing on 06/05/2017 final EIA submitted on 25/04/2018. EDS was issued by MoEF&CC dated 17/01/2019 mentioned “the

proposal is involved violation under the provisions of EIA notification, 2006. Therefore, PP was requested to make application under violation after issue of such notification for dealing of violation proposals”. The proposal is delisted from

Ministry’s website on 07/06/2019. PP requested MoEF&CC to relist the proposal and transfer the same to the violation

committee as ‘lateral Proposal Entry’, as per MoEF&CC Office Memorandum dated 09/09/2019.

Proposal was considered in 33rd meeting of EAC (Violation) held on 18/05/2020. committee recommended to submit the duly signed hard copy of the following documents: a) Revised Form/1 and PFR having details of Violation. b) Year/wise production detail s including total cost of the project, prior to

September, 2006. PP submitted the sought documents by EAC (Violation) to MoEF&CC on

08/09/2020. Proposal was considered in 36th meeting of EAC (Violation) held on 21-22nd

September, 2020. The EAC, after detail deliberation appraised the instant proposal and confirmed the case to be of violation of the EIA Notification, 2006 and recommended for issuing the ToR. Accordingly, MoEF&CC granted the ToR on 09/11/2020.

49.2.8 The unit configuration and capacity of existing and proposed project is given as below: Sl. No

Project Details

Existing Installed Units Proposed Units Total (Existing + Proposed)

Non/Violating Violating Units

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

1. Sponge Iron Plant

2x100 TPD

60,000 2x100 TPD

60,000 -- -- 4x100 TPD

120,000

2. Induction Furnaces

-- 2x12T 1x12T 3x12T

3. Billet Caster 2strands 6/11m

72,000 1strand 6/11m

36,000 3strand 6/11m

108,000

4. Rolling Mill -- -- 300 TPD 90,000 300 TPD 90,000 5. Captive

Power Plant -- --


Page 16 of 175

Sl. No

Project Details

Existing Installed Units Proposed Units Total (Existing + Proposed)

Non/Violating Violating Units

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

Unit Prod. (TPA)

AFBC Boiler 1 12 MW 1 12 MW WHRB 4 6 MW 4 6 MW

49.2.9 The details of the raw material requirement for the proposed project along with its source

and mode of transportation is given as below: Sl. No.

Item Requirement MT per Year Source Mode of Transport (Distance w.r.t.

plant Existing

(Non/Violating Units)

Existing (Violating

Units)

Proposed Total

1. Iron Ore 102,000 102,000 -- 204,000 Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd., Odisha

170 km by Rail 10 km from Railway Siding (Barkhakhana)

2. Coal 84,000 84,000 70,000 238,000 CCL, Saunda 18 km by Rail 10 km from Railway Siding (Barkhakhana)

3. Dolomite 3,000 3,000 -- 6,000 Local Market 50 km by Road 4. Scrap/

Revert Scrap

-- 16,500 8,250 24,750 Local Market 20 km by Road

49.2.10 Existing water requirement for Non/violating unit: 170 KLD, and Violating unit: 406 KLD,

Proposed: 2330 KLD. Total after Expansion: 2906 KLD. Thus, the make-up water requirement for the project is estimated of 2,906 KLD. Permission for drawl of 0.65MGD (2955KLD) from Damodar River has been obtained from Damodar Valley Corporation vide letter no MRO/Tariff Cell/JIPL/66 dated 04/02/2019.

49.2.11 Existing – 10.5 MW (Non-Violating – 0.8 MW & 9.7 MW for violating Units) Proposed –

7.5 MW (Expansion) Total after expansion: 18.00 MW, which will be met from Captive Power Plant. Prior to commissioning of CPP additional power will be sourced from Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) and JBVNL.

49.2.12 Baseline Environmental Studies:

Period 01/10/2020 to 31/12/2020 AAQ parameters at 8 locations (min and max)

PM2.5 = 32.6 to 56.5 μg/m3 PM10 = 61.4 to 95.8μg/m3 SO2 = 8.2 to 36.8 μg/m3 NO2 = 12.8 to 54.8 μg/m3 CO = 0.66 to 1.45 mg/m3

Incremental GLC level

PM10 = 2.08μg/m3(at 0.4 km in West) PM2.5 = 0.83 μg/m3(at 0.4 km in West) SO2 = 1.08 μg/m3(at 0.4 km in West) NOx = 0.55μg/m3(at 0.4 km in West)


pH: 7.15 to 7.62, Total Hardness: 185 to 235 mg/l, Chlorides: 50.0 to 61.0 mg/l,


Page 17 of 175

Fluoride: 0.22 to 0.38 mg/l, Heavy metals are within the limits


pH: 7.42 to 7.68; DO: 4.61 to 5.20 mg/l BOD: 6.0 to 10.0 mg/l COD: 24.0 to 30.0 mg/l

Noise levels Leq (Day and Night)

45.1 to 69.9 dB(A) for the day time and 34.9 to 56.6 dB(A) for the Night time


Traffic study has been conducted at SH-2 and Major District Road (MDR)-106 which are approximately 0.5 and 3.5 km from the plant site. Transportation of raw material, fuel & finished product will be done 100% by road. Existing PCU is 2000.5 PCU/day on MDR-106 and 3591 PCU/day on SH-2. Existing level of service (LOS) is:

Road V

(Volume in PCU/Day)

C (Capacity in PCU/Day)

Existing V/C Ratio

LOS

MDR 2000.5 15000 0.13 A SH-2 3591 15000 0.24 B

PCU load after proposed project will be 2135.5 PCU/Day (2000.5+ 135) on MDR-106 and 3726 PCU/Day (3591+135) on SH-2. level of service (LOS) will be:

Road V

(Volume in PCU/Day)

C (Capacity in PCU/Day)

Existing V/C Ratio LOS

MDR 2135.5 15000 0.14 A SH-2 3726 15000 0.25 B

Note:M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Pvt Ltd has submitted an application to East Central Railways, Barkakana vide letter dated 24/08/2021 for starting the work for construction of common user railway siding. In future, on completion of the work, the material will be transported by Railways. This will help in reducing the existing vehicular traffic on MDR-106 for transportation of Raw Material and Product.

Flora and fauna There is no Schedule-1 Species of Fauna and Endangered Flora species present in the study area.

49.2.13 The details of solid and hazardous waste generation along with its mode of treatment/disposal is furnished as below:

SN Type of Waste

Source Name


Disposal

Mode of Disposal


Non/ Violating

Violating Proposed

1. Dolochar DRI Kiln 15,000 15,000 -- -- In/House

AFBC Boiler MOU with

Inland Power

2. Dedusting

Dust DRI Kiln 11,040 11,040 -- --


MOU with NarsinghIspat










Page 18 of 175

SN Type of Waste

Source Name


Disposal

Mode of Disposal


Non/ Violating

Violating Proposed

3. Wet

Scrapper Sludge

DRI Kiln 1,800 1,800 -- -- Non/hazardous.

Land filling -

4. Slag Induction Furnace

-- 11,000 5,500

Metal recovery approx.

10%

Remaining slag, crushed and

used as aggregate

--

5. Sludge Venturi

Scrubber --

2,200 (In dry

condition)

1,100 (In dry

condition) --


MOU with Narsingh

Ispat

6. Scale CCM -- 500 250 -- Sold to Sinter

Plant

MOU with Narsingh

Ispat

7. Mill

Scales Rolling

Mill -- -- 600 --


MOU with Narsingh

Ispat

8. Fly-ash

from WHRB


Plant

MOU with Durga

Cement

9. Fly/ash from

AFBC CPP -- -- 41500 --

Sold to Cement Plant

MOU with Durga

Cement

10 Bottom

Ash from AFBC

CPP -- -- 10500 -- Sold to Brick

kiln manufacturing

--

49.2.14 Public Consultation:

Details of advertisement given

01/04/2017

Date of public consultation

06/05/2017

Venue Panchayat Bhawan, Village and P.O. Marar, Ramgarh District, Jharkhand

Presiding Officer Additional Collector Major issues raised i. Plantation

ii. Employment to Locals and adequate wages, iii. Agriculture affected due to pollution iv. Pollution Control Measures, v. Medical Facility and Safe Drinking Water.

Action plan as per MoEF&CC O.M. dated 30/09/2020:

SNo Activities Amount in INR

1stYear 2ndYear Total 1 Community Development Installation of one number of

bore/well based on Solar Pump C:\Users\HP\OneDrive\Desktop\49 EAC\l\NOC Borewell.pdf system

along with water storage Tank

3,068,360 [Complete

installation

of bore/well

having pump

-- 30,68,360






file:///C:/Users/HP/OneDrive/Desktop/49%20EAC/l/FLY%20ASH.pdf





file:///C:/Users/HP/OneDrive/Desktop/49%20EAC/l/NOC%20Borewell.pdf






Page 19 of 175

SNo Activities Amount in INR

1stYear 2ndYear Total each in Village Hesla and

Mahuatand, District: Ramgarh based on

Solar power

and water

storage

tanks] Greenbelt of 15m width, covering

an area of 0.45 ha. will be

developed along the periphery of

the village Argada, District:

Ramgarh, Jharkhand

450,000.00 [Greenbelt

Development

along the

periphery of

Argada

Village]

-- 4,50,000

2 Health Development Establishment of 16 Bedded

Hospital with advance medical

facilities with affordable and

quality services in village & P.O

Marar, District: Ramgarh

4,278,631 [Civil work

for two floor

building]

8,222,479 [Hospital

equipment, Lift,

Furniture,

Electrification,

Air Conditioner,

etc]

1,25,01,110

Grand Total in INR 16,019,470.0

49.2.15 Existing capital cost of project was 54.12 Cr. (Non/violating + Violating). The capital cost of the proposed project is Rs. 186.63Crores (after proposed expansion total capital cost of the project is Rs 240.75 Crores) and the capital cost for environmental protection measures along with the budget of activities to address Public Hearing Issues is proposed as Rs. 5.7011 Crores. The annual recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures is proposed as Rs 0.475 Crores. The employment generation from the proposed project / expansion is 394 Nos. The details of cost for environmental protection measures are as follows: Sl. No.

Description of Item Existing (Rs. in lakhs) Capital Cost Recurring Cost/

Year 1 Air Pollution Control/ Noise Management 259.32 15.5 2 Water Pollution Control 68.0 6.0 3 Solid Waste / Hazardous Waste Management 4.0 1.5 4 Environmental Monitoring and Management 11.0 11.0 5 Green Belt Development 49.60 2.0 6 OH & S 18.0 11.5 7 Addressal of Public Consultation concerns 160.19 //

Total 570.11 47.5

49.2.16 Existing green belt has been developed in 1.54 ha area which is about 10.7 % of the total project area of 14.38 ha with total sapling of 2000 trees (@ 1298 trees/ha). Proposed greenbelt will be developed in 4.22 ha which is about 29.3 % of the total project area. Thus, the total of 5.76 ha area (40 % of total area) will be developed as greenbelt. A 3 m wide

file:///C:/Users/HP/OneDrive/Desktop/49%20EAC/l/NOC%20Hospital.pdf

file:///C:/Users/HP/OneDrive/Desktop/49%20EAC/l/NOC%20Hospital.pdf


Page 20 of 175

greenbelt, consisting of at least 3 tiers around plant boundary will be developed as greenbelt and green cover as per CPCB/MoEF&CC, New Delhi guidelines. Local and native species will be planted with a density of 2500 trees per hectare. Total no. of 14400 saplings will be planted and nurtured in 5.76 hectares in three years.

49.2.17 Summary of violation under EIA, 2006 furnished below:

Company has installed 2x100TPD DRI Kiln and 2x12T Induction Furnace after obtaining NOC from JSPCB on 06.11.2006 and is operating the same till date, without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance as per EIA Notification 2006. The Damage Assessment was carried out for violation period for Construction and Operation Phase. The total amount to be spent on Remediation plan and Natural Resource Augmentation Plan and Community Resource Augmentation Plan will be Rs.562.235 Lakhs. This plan will be implemented in three years after obtaining all necessary clearances. Detail are given as below: Yearly Budget for implementation of Remediation Plan SNo Environment

Component Activity Description Total Budgetary Provision in Rs.

1stYear 2ndYear 3rd Year Total 1 Land Environment 1.Assistance to

farmers by providing seedlings, manure and Bio-fertilizers to villagers of Hesla and Maraar=Rs.46,000/- 2.Providing one tractor (Make Mahindra) with hydraulic trolley and Rotavator to be provided to each Nagar panchayat of village Hesla and Maraar =Rs.34,00,000/- 3.Providing Bundmaker, Ridger, plough for agriculture purpose to villagers of Hesla and Maraar=Rs.4,24,500/-

19,35,250 (ProvidingTractor, Bundmaker, Ridger, Plough and Seedlings, manure inNagarpanchayat ofHesla)

19,35,250 (Providing Tractor, Bundmaker, Ridger, Plough and Seedlings, manure in Nagar panchayat of Maraar)

-- 38,70,500

2 Air Environment 1. Providing four E-Rickshaw (4-seater, Make: Mac Auto) with charger for public transport in each Barkakana, Maraar, Phulsarai and Argada villages =Rs25,00,000/- 2. Solar stove, solar street light & solar fan in Argada & Hesala village=Rs.13,78,000/-

12,50,000 (Providing 4E-Ricksaweach inBarkakanaand Maraarvillages)

12,50,000 (Providing 4E-Ricksaweach in Phulsarai and Argada villages)

13,78,000 (Solar stove, solar street light & solar fan in Argada & Hesala village)

38,78,000

3 WaterEnvironment 1.Drinking water plant (10nos.) including bore well with solar power

1,68,00,000 (Drinking water plant (10 nos)

1,02,00,000 (Renovation of Ponds

69,63,000 (Construction of Covered

3,39,63,000

VCOMGGM104

Highlight


Page 21 of 175

SNo Environment Component

Activity Description Total Budgetary Provision in Rs. 1stYear 2ndYear 3rd Year Total

with water cooler including RO & UV in Argada & Hesala village- Rs1,50,00,000/- 2. Sewage treatment plant in village Hesla Rs 50,00,000/- 3. Rain water harvesting pit (@Rs.3lakhs/location) at Panchayat office of Hesla, Argada, Barkakana, Manuan, Maraar and Phulsarai villages=Rs.18,00,000/ 4. Renovation of Ponds (Includes Cleaning/ desiltation, concrete Lining) and construction of wharf and platforms in pond located in each of Argada, Hesla, Manuan, and Maraar villages (Rs.2,500,000x4 +200,000) =Rs.1,02,00,000/- 5. Construction of Covered Drainage system along with sewage pits within village Hesla =Rs.19,63,000/-

including borewell with solar power with water cooler including RO& UV in Argada & Hesala village & Rainwater Harvesting pit at Panchayat office of Hesla, Argada, Barkakana, Manuan, Maraar and Phulsarai villages)

(Includes Cleaning /desiltation, concrete Lining) and construction of wharf and platforms in pond located in each of Argada, Hesla, Manuan, and Maraar villages)

Drainage system along with sewage pit within village Hesla & Sewage treatment plant in village Hesla)

4 Noise Environment

1. Providing ENT clinic along with Doctor in Hesla and Argada villages= Rs 4,86,000/- 2. Distribution of Hearing aids to the needed Sr. Citizens of the Hesla, Maraar and Argada villages @ 1000x500 person =Rs.5,00,000/-

4,86,000 (Providing ENT specialist Clinic along with Doctor in Hesla and Argada villages)

5,00,000 (Distribution of Hearing Aids to the needed Sr. Citizens of the Hesla, Maraar and Argada villages)

-- 9,86,000

5

Biological Environment

1.Funds for conservation of fauna in Phulsarai Protected Forest to the District Forest Office=Rs.6,10,000/

6,10,000 (Funds for conservation of fauna residing in Naisarai Protected forest)

-- -- 6,10,000

Total 2,10,81,250 1,38,85,250 83,41,000 4,33,07,500


Page 22 of 175

Natural Resource Augmentation Plan along with budget Sl. No.

Proposed Activities Budget (Rs.) 1stYear 2ndYear 3rd Year Total

1

Installation of Biodegradable waste converter (Make: Reddonatura, Capacity: 75kg/day) in Argada, Manuan and Hesla village

10,00,000 (Argada)

10,00,000 (Manuan)

10,00,000 (Hesla)

30,00,000

2

Cattle food processing plant with veterinary hospital at Hesla villages

10,00,000 5,00,000 -- 15,00,000

3

Biogas plant in Manuan, Barkakana and Maraar village

8,00,000 (Manuan)

8,00,000 (Barkakana)

8,00,000 (Maraar)

24,00,000

Total 28,00,000 23,00,000 18,00,000 69,00,000

Community Resource Augmentation Plan along with budget S.

No. Proposed Activities Budget (Rs.)

1stYear 2ndYear 3rdYear Total 1. Oxygen plant at Hesla village 30,00,000 30,00,000 16,000 60,16,000

Summary

S.No. Activity proposed Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total (in Lakhs)

a. Damage remediation plan

2,10,81,250 1,38,85,250 83,41,000 433.07500

b. Natural Resources Augmentation plan

28,00,000 23,00,000 18,00,000 69

c. Community Resources Augmentation plan

30,00,000 30,00,000 16,000 60.16

Total 562.23500

Violation aspect: In compliance to the specific ToR No. i, the SPCB has undertaken credible action against M/s.JIPL under the provisions of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, by filing a court case no. 255 of 2021 before the Hon’ble District Court of Ramgarh.

49.2.18 Summary of court cases related to the project are furnished given as below: Detail Case1 Case 2 Case 3

Name of the

court High Court of Jharkhand,

Ranchi District Court of

Ramgarh District Court of

Hazaribagh Name of the

Sub/court -- Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Ramgarh Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Hazaribagh Case No. W.P.(C) No. 1125 of

2014 Complaint case No.

255/2021 Complaint case No.

331/2013 Orders /

Directions

of the court,

The writ is pending for

final disposal.

Meanwhile Hon’ble

Case has been filed on

25/03/2021 to initiate

credible action against

Case has been filed on

21/12/2013 to initiate

credible action against

file:///F:/Industry%201/49%20meeting/HC%20case%201125-2014%20(24.03.2014).pdf

file:///F:/Industry%201/49%20meeting/HC%20case%201125-2014%20(24.03.2014).pdf

file:///F:/Industry%201/49%20meeting/Credible%20Action_JIPL.pdf

file:///F:/Industry%201/49%20meeting/Credible%20Action_JIPL.pdf

file:///F:/Industry%201/49%20meeting/Hazaribagh%20Court%20case%20(331.pdf

file:///F:/Industry%201/49%20meeting/Hazaribagh%20Court%20case%20(331.pdf

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight


Page 23 of 175

Detail Case1 Case 2 Case 3 if any and its

relevance

with the

proposed

project

High Court has passed

interim order on

24/03/2014 for stay on

clause no. 27 of Consent

to Operate of JSPCB

dated 10/12/2012,

allowing the PP to

operate the expanded

part of unit.

the project proponent

and next hearing date is

scheduled 07/10/2022.

the project proponent

and next hearing date is

scheduled 28/01/2022.

Case Details Writ petition filed

against clause no. 27 of

Consent to Operate

issued by Jharkhand

State Pollution Control

Board on 10/12/2012 asking the unit to stop

the operation of

expanded part

(2x100TPD DRI Kiln

and 240TPD Billet

Plant)

Case has been filed for

the offence committed

u/s 15 of Environment

(Protection) Act, 1986

cognizance u/s 19 of

Environment

(Protection) Act, 1986 in

compliance of

MoEF&CC TOR letter

J/11011/41/2013/IA.II(I)

dated 09/11/2020

Case has been filed for

the offence committed

u/s 15 of Environment

(Protection) Act, 1986

cognizance u/s 19 of

Environment

(Protection) Act, 1986 in

compliance of MoEF&

CC letter

J/11011/41/2013/IA.II(I)

dated 12/06/2013

49.2.19 Name of the EIA consultant: M/s. Vardan EnviroNet [S.No. 41 in List of ACOs with their

Certificate no. NABET/EIA/1922/RA 0166; valid up to 06/11/2022, Rev. 16, November 15, 2021].

Certified Compliance report from Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board

49.2.20 The Status of compliance of earlier CTO was obtained from Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board vide letter no. 476 dated 05/04/2021 in the name of M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited. As per inspection report of JSPCB, the PP is complying with the prescribed CTO conditions except management of dolochar generated from DRI kilns.

49.2.21 M/s. Jharkhand Ispat Private Limited has earlier made an online application vide proposal

no. IA-JH/IND/212892/2020dated 03/06/2021. The proposal was considered in 40th

meeting of the Re/constituted EAC (Industry-I) held on 15-16th July, 2021. The observations and recommendations of EAC is given as below:

Observations of the Committee held on 15-16th July, 2021

49.2.22 The Committee noted the following: i. Water balance diagram for DRI shall be checked and corrected. The water balance

diagram for monsoon season shall be submitted and explained. ii. In transportation study report, the Level of Service (LOS) in MDR/106 is “D” which

has to be improved by working out alternate route or by other measures to bring the LOS to at least B.

iii. In Public Hearing Grievances one of the main requirements raised was to reduce dust impact in nearby villages which needs to be addressed by an action plan like providing greenbelt / thick plantation/surrounding nearby villages like Argada, eski, etc. A

VCOMGGM104

Highlight


Page 24 of 175

detailed study of these areas to be conducted to find out the requirements to mitigate the same and the budgetary provision with specific quantity and period shall be incorporated.

iv. Details of management of effluent and storm water during monsoon to be furnished. v. Action plan for green belt development needs to be revisited as the density proposed

for green belt is 1500 trees per ha which is not as per the CPCB norms. vi. PM10 at site, Argada and Sirka in post project scenario shall exceed 100 µg/m3 under

worst case scenario. No specific EMP has been suggested to bring it down. vii. AAQ modelling shall be again carried out as same mixing height is used for day and

night time which is not correct. viii. Damage assessment report

a. Lump sum Cost taken for topsoil damage of quantity 25100 cum to be revised by assigning unit cost per cum (i.e. Rs.15 Per cum) against total quantity.

b. Table 13.5 to be revised and damage due to emission of Sox & NOX during construction to be included. Details of equipment/ machinery operating hours, working hours per day, vehicle lead distance, total open area/ non constructed area under impact of wind erosion and fuel consumption to be included.

c. Emission from all sources and for total production since 2006 to be considered for calculation of impact due to air emission. Emission from material handling, internal transportation, and impact of wind erosion from stockyard to be included for calculation of total impact.

d. Monetary value in Table 13.13 to be corrected as per revised total emission under controlled environment.

e. Rainwater runoff to be revised based on specific land use runoff coefficient for different types of land cover, covering total plot area for both construction and operation period.

f. For compensation of rainwater loss, total cost of construction of RWH structures shall be taken as damage cost. Cost of RWH structure can be referred from respective state guidelines.

g. Table 13.9 to be revised as per standard water requirement of not less than 1 KL per 1 Sqm constructed area for total area of 2.97 ha and water usage for other activities to be included as per water balance table apart from DRI Kiln and induction furnace with CCM for complete operation period since 2006.

h. The damage cost taken for noise to be revised and damage to be calculated as per CPCB guidelines / Noise rules 2000 and NGT directions on same.

i. The damage cost taken for biodiversity and crop damage to be revised as per Indian standards and reference.

j. The damage cost taken against gap plantation to be revised @2500 trees per hectare. k. The amount allotted against PH grievance as per OM dated 30/09/2020 should be

worked out considering Greenbelt / thick plantation for nearby two villages as mentioned above and to be included in the EMP cost.

l. The activities and corresponding cost proposed under Remediation plan, Natural and Community resource augmentation plan to be revisited, and actual cost as per market standards to be included for same. The proposed activity to each village needs to be quantified.

m. The activities under the above shall be specific with time period of 3 years and monitorable.


Page 25 of 175

ix. Argada Village is 200 m from site in west. Raw material yard is located adjacent to boundary facing the village. Hels village is 400 m from site in east. Environmental safeguards to be adopted has not been mentioned.

x. Table number 3.16, 3.17 and 3.18 of EIA report pertaining to analysis of soil samples, land use pattern, villages selected for socio/economic survey needs to be revisited and corrected.

xi. Damodar river is located at a distance of 0.3km from the project site in southern direction. Authenticated HFL details of the river, protection measures to be adopted along river side and impact on riverine ecology has not been submitted.

Recommendations of the Committee held on 15-16th July, 2021 49.2.23 In view of the foregoing and after deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal

to be returned in its present form to address the technical deficiencies enumerated above.

49.2.24 M/s. Jharkhand Ispat (P) Ltd has made an online application vide proposal no. IA/JH/IND/236898/2020 dated 15/11/2021. The proposal was considered in 49th meeting of the Re/constituted EAC (Industry-I) held on 16 - 17th December, 2021. The observations and recommendations of EAC is given as below:

Observations of the Committee

49.2.25 The Committee noted the following: i. The proposal was accorded ToR on 9/11/2020 as per the provisions contained under

S.O. 804 (E) dated 14/03/2017. As per para 13(3) of the said notification, no consent to operate or occupancy certificate will be issued till the project is granted the environmental clearance for the units under violation.

ii. Violation aspect involved in the instant proposal is “PP had installed 2x100TPD DRI Kiln and 2x12T Induction Furnace without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance as per EIA Notification 2006”.

iii. As per the information made available by the proponent i.e. page no.13 of the final EIA report and slide no. 40 of the presentation, the aforementioned units which are under violation are being operated continuously by the proponent without obtaining requisite environment clearance which is not in conformity to the provisions contained under S.O. 804 € dated 14/03/2017. Further, as per the undertaking submitted by the proponent, it has been stated that the violating units are not under operation. Thus, conflicting statements have been made by the proponent and EIA consultant regarding the operation of the violating units since grant of ToR and misled the EAC as well as the Ministry deliberately with a malafide intention to obtain EC.

iv. The court cases reflected at para no. 49.2.18 are not given in s.no. 37 of Form 2 except case no. 255 of 2021.

Recommendations of the Committee

49.2.26 In view of the foregoing and after detailed deliberations, the committee recommended to defer the proposal and sought following additional information from the proponent.


Page 26 of 175

i. Details regarding operation of the violating units namely 2x100TPD DRI Kiln and 2x12T Induction Furnace since from the date of grant of CTE dated 6/11/2006 to till date.

ii. Explanation shall be submitted by the proponent as well as the EIA consultant for suppressing the information in Form 2 regarding the ongoing court cases as reflected at para no. 49.12.8.

iii. Explanation shall be submitted by the consultant regarding suppression of information regarding the operation of violating units at the time of grant of Terms of Reference accorded on 9/11/2020 under the provisions of S.O. 804 (E) dated 14/03/2017.

iv. Action plan for the utilization of dolochar generated from the DRI kiln shall be submitted.

49.3 Expansion of existing Integrated steel plant to final capacity of Sponge Iron –2,054,000

TPA, Billets (Mild & Alloy Steel) / 23,73,566 TPA, Rolled Products – 15,60,000 TPA, Captive Power – 308 MW, Pellets – 30,00,000 TPA, Producer Gas Plant / 96,450 Nm3/hr, Sinter Plant / 5,90,625 TPA, Blast Furnace / 3,93,750 TPA by M/s. Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited located at Village – Pandloi, Block /Lapanga, District / Sambalpur, Odisha [Online Proposal No. IA/OR/IND/5330/2008, File No. J/11011/495/2006/IA.II(I)] – Environment Clearance – regarding

49.3.1 M/s. Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited has made an online application vide proposal no. IA/OR/IND/5330/2008, dated 15/11/2021 along with copy of EIA/EMP report, Form – 2 and certified compliance report seeking Environment Clearance (EC) under the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 for the project cited above. The project activity is listed at schedule no. 3(a), Metallurgical Industries (ferrous & non/ferrous) and 1(d) Thermal Power Plants under Category “A” of the schedule of the EIA Notification, 2006.

Details submitted by Project proponent

49.3.2 The details of the ToR are furnished as below: Date of

application Consideration Details Date of

accord ToR

validity

14/12/2020 27th meeting of EAC held on 30-31th December, 2020

Recommended for grant of ToR

14/01/2021 13/01/2025

49.3.3 The project of M/s. Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited is located at Village/Pandloi,

Block Lapanga, Tehsil Rengali, District Sambalpur, Odisha is for expansion of existing integrated steel plant to final capacity of Sponge Iron– 20,54,000 TPA, Billets (Mild & Alloy Steel)/ 23,73,566 TPA, Rolled Products – 15,60,000 TPA, Captive Power/ 308 MW (CFBC/ 188 MW & WHRB/ 120 MW), Pellets/ 30,00,000 TPA, Producer Gas Plant/ 96,450 Nm3/hr, Sinter Plant/ 5,90,625 TPA, Blast Furnace/ 3,93,750 TPA, Coal Washery/ 10,00,000 TPA, Ferro Alloy/ 2,50,000 TPA, Billet Caster/ 2,00,000 TPA, Bloom Caster/ 3,53,000 TPA, Lime Plant/ 60,000 TPA.

Violation Production Data

Year

Production Capacity (MT) post EIA notification 2006

Non Violating Production

(MT) Violated production (MT)

Sponge Iron (Kiln 1 to 4)

M.S.Billet Total Kiln 1 & 2 Kiln 3 & 4 M.S.Billet Total

2006-07 29672.0 32858.4 62530.4 29672.0 0.0 32858.3 32858.4

2007-08 27076.0 32627.3 59703.3 27076.0 0.0 32627.2 32627.3

2008-09 21225.0 41611.9 62836.9 21225.0 0.0 41611.9 41611.9

2009-10 20295.0 41518.5 61813.5 20295.0 0.0 41518.5 41518.5

2010-11 16996.0 40058.7 57054.7 16996.0 0.0 40058.7 40058.7

2011-12 21007.0 41755.4 62762.4 21007.0 0.0 41755.4 41755.4

2012-13 32735.0 39048.5 71783.5 31373.0 1362.0 39048.5 40410.5

2013-14 56377.0 49740.0 106117.0 56377.0 0.0 49740.0 49740.0

2014-15 66177.0 44735.3 110912.3 59000.0 10852.0 44735.3 55587.3

2015-16 71404.0 53073.5 124477.5 59000.0 10327.0 53073.5 63400.5

2016-17 54777.0 53694.0 108471.0 54777.0 4935.0 53694.0 58629.0

2017-18 61225.0 52605.4 113830.4 59000.0 9729.0 52605.4 62334.4

2018-19 70873.0 62448.6 133321.6 58900.0 16908.0 62448.6 79356.6

2019-20 80135.0 71045.6 150179.6 58700.0 21615.0 71045.6 92660.6

2020-21 66017.0 69149.5 135166.5 57416.0 8601.0 69149.5 77750.5

2021-22 (Up to 30.11.2021)

44192.0 49060.0 93621.0 44192.0 0.0 49060.0 49060.0

Total 740183 775031 1514582 675006 84329 775030 859360

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-O

5/14/2020 Case Status : Search by Case Number

https://services.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/case_no.php?state_cd=7&dist_cd=1&court_code=1&stateNm=Jharkhand# 1/2

Case Type : WPCFiling Number : 5103/2014 Filing Date: 21-02-2014Registration Number : 1125/2014 Registration Date: 22-02-2014CNR Number : JHHC01-014883-2014

1) MS JHARKHAND ISPAT PVT LTD THROUGH ONE OF ITS DIRECTOR SIR RAMCHANDRA RUNGTA

Advocate- RAJIV RANJAN,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDIVISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI ,SHRESTH GAUTAM,VISHAL KUMARTRIVEDI,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI,SHRESTH GAUTAM,SHRESTH GAUTAM,SHRESTHGAUTAM,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI

1) STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ORS

Advocate - A.A.G. -1, ,AJAY KR PANDEY,MD MOKHTAR KHAN,MD MOKHTAR KHAN,AJAY KR PANDEY,MD MOKHTARKHAN,MD MOKHTAR KHAN,AJAY KR PANDEY,AJAY KR PANDEY2) The Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board Ranchi 3) The Member Secretary Jharkhand Stat Pollution Cont 4) The Union Of India Through Its Secretary

High Court of JharkhandPrincipal Bench Jharkhand

Case Details

Case StatusFirst Hearing Date : 05th May 2014Next Hearing Date : Next Date is not givenStage of Case : AdmissionCoram : 24854Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediBench : Single BenchState : JHARKHANDDistrict : RamgarhJudicial : Civil SectionCauselist Name : Daily

Petitioner and Advocate

Respondent and Advocate

History of Case HearingCause List Type Judge Business On Date Hearing Date Purpose of hearing

Hon'ble Mr Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari 05-05-2014 Fresh FilingHon'ble Mr Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari Admission

Daily Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi Admission

Orders

OrderNumber Judge Order Date Order Details

1 24-03-2014 2 Not Available 05-05-2014 3 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi 03-12-2019

Category DetailsCategory CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION-11300 ( 113 )Sub Category Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-11301 ( 1 )Sub Sub Category Quashing Matter ( 25 )

OBJECTIONSr.No. Scrutiny Date OBJECTION Compliance Date Receipt Date1 22-02-2014 1) Other Defects..... -- 01-03-2014

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-P

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1125 of 2014

M/s Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner-Versus-

State of Jharkhand & Others … Respondents-----

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI -----

For the Petitioner : Mr. Piyush Chitresh, AdvocateFor the Respondents : A.C. to Mr. Jai Prakash, A.A.G.-I

-----

04/03.12.2019. Let this matter go out of my list, to be placed before another Bench with

prior approval of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

Ajay/

PREVIOUS EC DETAILS & COMPLIANCE STATUS • EC Granted on - No EC granted for the Existing Units

Sl. Facilities Consent Status Implementation Remark No Envisaged CTE/CTO Status

•

1. 2x100TPD DRI Kiln CTE from JSPCB Installed and Non-Violating (Sponge Iron dated 31.07.2003 operational Units as units 60,000 TPA) CTO was valid till installed prior to

30.09.2021. CTO 2006 and the renewal application project cost was dated 02.06.2021 less than Rs. 100 submitted to JSPCB Crs.

2. 2x100TPD DRI Kiln CTE fr om JSPCB Installed and Under Violation as (Sponge Iron dated 06.11.2006 operating on the the Units were 60,000 TPA) CTO was granted till basis stay order installed after

3. 2x12Ton Induction 31.12.2011. No valid of Hon'ble High November, 2006

Furnace CTO at present Court order dated and no prior

(MS Billets 24.3.2014 Environment Clearance was 72000TPA) taken

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Highlight

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-Q

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-R

Dolochar Management Plan

The Dolochar quantity of 30000 TPA having calorific value of 1400 Kcal/Kg will

be generated from the 4x100 TPD DRI Kilns, which will be used as raw material

in AFBC Boiler (60 TPH) along with Coal (Calorific Value – 3800 Kcal/kg) for

power generation of 12 MW. If in case, the production of DRI kiln is low, the

entire dolochar generated and coal in fixed ratios (Dolochar - 30% & Coal -

70%) shall be used to generate power accordingly. No Dolochar shall be

wasted or stacked inside or outside

Table: Fuel Requirement for Power plant

AFBC

Item Composition per

unit of fuel Requirement MT per day

Requirement MT per year

CHAR (CV – 1400 Kcal/Kg) 0.30 100.0 30,000

COAL (CV – 3800 Kcal/Kg) 0.70 233.3 70,000

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

VCOMGGM104

Typewritten Text

Annexure-S

Environmental Clearance

Documents

Transcript of Environmental Clearance