empirical approach to note taking in academic discourse
Transcript of empirical approach to note taking in academic discourse
1
PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO NOTE-TAKING IN ACADEMIC DICOURSE
Abstract
One of the most daunting challenges confronting and affecting the
performances of students in higher institutions today is
difficulty in grasping and recording accurately, the information
passed unto them during lectures. Most affected by this problem
are the slow writers among the students. In some lecture
situations, notes are dictated, while in some cases, discussion
methods are employed. In either of the situations, each student
is expected to harvest his own bits of information as fast as he
can. Whether it is a dictated or a discussed lecture, it remains
indubitable that no student can achieve any success beyond his
ability to grasp, organize and recollect the information
disseminated in the learning process. Granted that different
methods are being innovated in pedagogical practice today, it is
an undeniable fact that the faintest ink is better than the
sharpest memory. Information items that are scribbled on pieces
of paper will always be available when vagaries of time might
have effaced those that were merely crammed in the brain.
Besides, it has been observed that sometimes, conflict erupts
between listening and writing when the slow writers get confused
in a lecture and cannot cope with the speaking rate of the
lecturer. Ironically however, all students have the potential to
get the best in every academic discourse event irrespective of
their differences in writing speed. The major problem is their
deficiency in note-taking skills. This paper therefore attempts
2
to predict the way out through exploration of some concepts and
principles that are considered germane to note-taking activities
with specific focus on oral academic discourse.
Key words: Note-taking, Academic discourse, Information, Memory
Introduction
Chukwuma and Otagburuagu (1997) posit that “the main purpose of
note-taking is to summarize the content of a lecture or a written
text into its most important points with the aim of reading,
recalling, and evaluating at a later stage.” Royster and Lester
(1996) also to corroborate this view in the following words:
“Taking notes as you listen, is a good way to sort out main ideas
and supporting details. The process of taking notes also helps
you remember what you have heard.” Oyerokan (1993) citing James
(1979) also identified three major components of note-taking;
namely: decoding what is heard, comprehending the message and
writing what is important. Jones and Mort (2010) also observed
that “Good note taking allows a permanent record of relevant
points that you can integrate with your own writing, and that can
be used for exam revision”. From the above understanding, it is
clear that the key elements in note-taking centre on getting
information in an academic discourse, selectively jotting down
the essential points and organizing them for future study.
Therefore, in order to get the best from any academic discourse,
students must be well grounded in some basics in note-taking
skills which form the crux of this paper. For the purpose of
3
clarity, the following topics shall be examined in this paper:
the significance of note-taking in scholarship, steps in note-
taking, delimitation of ideas, encrypting in note-taking,
principle of effective note-taking, basic rules of note-taking
and barriers to effective note-taking.
1.0 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF NOTE-TAKING IN LEARNING PROCESS
The literature is very clear as regards the importance of note-
taking in academic activities. Scholars are agreed on the fact
that there is no reasonable learning process that does not
involve having to take special note of certain cogent points and
jot them down in a concise form. Human memory has been noted to
be fraught with pressures that sometimes result in forgetfulness.
This underscore the general belief that ideas scribbled on a
writing material is better than the one crammed in the memory.
This informed the emphases placed on note-taking in this piece.
The points highlighted below are therefore considered as the
major significance of note-taking in scholarship.
1.1 To enhance effective listening:
Kolawole and Adelabu (2004:25) assert that, “Taking note during a
lecture helps students to concentrate on what the speaker is
saying.” It is reasonable to agree with this view based on the
assumption that in most communicative events, there are lots of
distracting forces that can impede effectiveness in listening. A
listener that is keen on jotting down points as they are being
4
uttered by the speaker would focus more on the source of
information than those who are merely listening with mental
commitment alone. It shows keen interest in collecting
information and recording them on the spot. This assumption is
reinforced by the view of Chukwuma and Otagburuagwu (1997:3) that
“the aim to make note This makes listening more practical and
efficient.
1.2 For future memory jogging
Ideas that are reduced into summary notes are easy to remember in
later days than those not written down. Banjo and Bisong
(1985:171) accentuate this view by asserting that “we make note
because we need to understand what we are reading or listening
to.”It is a common knowledge that key points in every discourse
are usually surrounded by a host of satellites generally called
supporting details. What the listener needs to remember in order
to sum up the totality of the knowledge gained in a specific
discourse event is the key point. Therefore, with a well packaged
note, one’s memory can be easily jogged up at a later day when
the need arise to recollect those ideas for immediate use. Merely
seeing just the major point can remind the writer most of the
issues raised during the original presentation of the discourse.
Therefore, except what are listening to is for mere
entertainment, we cannot but take notes in order to enhance
recollection of some facts whenever the need arises.
1.3 Consolidation of the cogent points
5
It has been mentioned earlier that every discourse comprises
major points and satellites such as explanations, illustrations,
exemplifications, analogies, justifications, and so forth. In a
good listening exercise, the listener’s major focus is supposed
to centre on the key points. He is expected to identify these key
points and how they are substantiated through the supporting
details. The ability to gather the key points into a coherent
whole is therefore the chief concern of note-taking. For
instance, a single point presented in only one sentence can
attract seven other sentences in the process of justification and
clarification. What this implies is that as you listen to the
presenter, your main target is the key points. After you might
have got the true picture of the central point you are to gather
points so presented together into one unit of note. This will
solve the problem of voluminous writing that would have ensued if
you have to write word for word what the presenter is saying.
This of course is not always possible. Through note-taking
therefore, key points that are scattered through a vast stretch
of discourse will be selectively extracted and compiled into only
one comprehensive note.
1.4 To save time at the stage of revision
For every student in academic environment, examination is one of
the immediate central foci of every learning activity. Therefore,
all the knowledge acquired during lessons would need to be
reviewed when examination approaches. Note gathered during the
6
various lectures and reading exercise becomes handy at such
point. Having read and heard on a lot of concepts, it is not
always possible to go back and re-read all the books one has
already read. This time around, the recourse is the summarised
notes obtained in relation to each of the subjects from the
various sources of information. The significance note-taking is
the “charge and bail” role it plays when there is no more enough
time to skim through volumes of books before entering the
examination hall.
1.5 To sift and organise your information to suit your own study
style
Note-taking helps you to sort out the essentials and
nonessentials both in the information you obtained from verbal
discourse and written discourse. This in turn are organised into
different units based on the subject areas in order to define
your mode of study when the examination begins to approach. It
becomes easy for you to pick one after the other, the concise
notes that have been compiled on separate concepts in each
subject for revision. It makes for a well organised study
process than someone who does not bother about notes. It saves
students from reading dilemma at the peak period of examination
preparation.
2.0 BASIC STEPS IN NOTE-TAKING
Chukwuma and Otagburuagu(1997:4) propose three basic steps in
note-taking. These include preparatory step, note-taking activity
7
and reorganisation. The preparatory step according to them
involves physical, emotional and mental preparation. By physical
preparation, you are expected to be well dressed, come to the
venue early enough to secure a seat in a vantage position. Also
you are to get good writing material like notebook and ballpoint
pen for the task. Emotional preparation demands that you should
rid your mind of every psychological burden that could hinder you
from concentration during the discourse. You are also advised to
acquaint yourself with the topic before lecture so as to be able
to follow the train of thought of the speaker. This is referred
to as mental preparation. There however remain some other salient
steps proposed by some other scholars in relation to effective
note-taking. Some of these are highlighted below:
2.1 Approach the lecture with a curious attitude
Approach the lecture with a sincere desire to acquire knowledge.
Have it at back of your mind that you are there to obtain
important information in relation to a specific concept in a
particular area of knowledge. That means you must set a target in
relation to the topic being discussed with intention to grab as
many information units as possible.
2.2 Identify the Purpose of the discourse
8
You are required to identify your reason for participating in the
discourse in order to determine the focus and scope of your note-
taking. If the main goal of participating in a discourse is not
for examination purpose but to widen your horizon of knowledge,
there may not be any need for a meticulous arrangement of points.
But if the goal is purely hinged on academic exercise you have to
employ your best methodology and skills towards mote-taking in
such situation.
2.3 Maintain eyes contact with the speaker
Let your attention be fully focused upon the speaker and watch
with keen interest every point at which he introduces a new idea
in his train of thought. With the above points it can be said
that you are prepared for note-taking activity. However the
activities proper entail some basic skills some of which are
discussed under the sub-topics below:
3.0 PRINCIPLES OF GOOD NOTE TAKING
3.1 Write date, subject, name of lecturer and topic
It is very important to start every note-taking by writing the
date, the topic being discussed and the name of the lecturer at
the top of your note. This will enable you to establish links
between all fragments of notes gathered from different lectures
delivered by the same lecturer on the same topic.
3.2 Use of headings and subheadings
9
It is important to note that every note-taking exercise is
usually based on a specific concept. You must therefore mark each
unit of recording with appropriate heading in order to keep your
materials properly organized for reference at a later stage.
3.3 Watch out for the major divisions of the lecture:
You must be alert to the introduction preambles in order to
recognise the major divisions of the lecture. This will enable
you to address your mind to the possible main points that may
feature in the discourse. You will thus be able to exercise
anticipatory skill of listening in the process of the discourse.
That is, you will be able anticipate what comes next after each
unit of thought and as a result flow effectively with the speaker
rate of speech.
3.4 Watch out for key points and mark supporting details
This implies that you must watch out connectives and discourse
markers that indicate introduction of a new idea so as to know
where a new idea begins and where supporting details are
introduced.
3.5 Distinguish between main points and supporting details
As a strategy towards identifying and jotting down only the main
points in an oral discourse, you are to identify words that are
used for introducing the main idea such as topic sentence as
different from markers of supporting details. Supporting details
10
could be many within a paragraph; but the main point is usually
one.
3.6 Watch out for meaning clarifying cues before writing
In every verbal presentation, there is always the use of
different paraverbal and non verbal cues that serve as
illocutionary force indicating devices. These can be used to
properly decode the unstated meanings associated with the spoken
words of the presenter. These devices include, facial
expressions, transitional words, discourse markers like, emphatic
words such as it is obvious, definitely and of course, hedges:
possible, might, perhaps, maximisers: completely, absolutely,
entirely, or minimisers: only, just, hardly, simply, merely. A
combination of all these with the overtly stated facts will be
required for proper interpretation and formulation of
comprehensive summary of the core message without adding the
unnecessary details. That is, you are to employ the meanings
implications of those devices to draw inferences that will give
you the data to jot down in a concise form.
3.7 Assign separate note book to each subject
You must choose a specific note book for each subject in order to
avoid jumbling your materials in such way that can pose problem
at the stage of revision. A well organized note makes for
11
convenient revision and easy assimilation at the stage of exam
preparation.
3.8 Select what is relevant
You do not need to write down everything that is said by the
speaker in an academic presentation. By paying attention to the
main point, you are to employ the information supplied in the
supporting details as a means to gain better understanding of the
central message and restate it in your own language.
3.9 Use numbering occasionally
Sometimes, it may become necessary to delineate your data through
numbering of points Do not hesitate to do this. Some itemized
points in a discourse usually need to be numbered.
3.10 Include your own thoughts
In note-taking, you are free to insert your pervious ideas that
are relevant to the data supplied by the speaker. State the fact
in your own language buttressing the point from your own logical
perspective.
4.0 BASIC RULES OF NOTE-TAKING
For effective note taking to be achieved, there are some pitfalls
to be avoided. These are highlighted in the rules below for easy
understanding.
12
4.1 Resist distractions
As a general rule, the need for concentration in any
communicative transaction is not negotiable. It is a generally
acknowledged assumption that when a listener tolerates
distraction, there is bound to loss of information. You are
therefore required to avoid distraction and give total
concentration to the presentation.
4.2 Do not write in haste
The general goal of note taking is to get the core messages of
the speaker and summarise them in your own language with maximum
economy of words. In that wise, you are not to jump into writing
until a unit of thought is fully expressed with all its
supporting details. At such time, it will be easy to extract and
summarise the main point and conveniently skip the supporting
details without losing anything. Hasty writing has a way of
swelling the note with unnecessary junks. Besides, you may not be
able to cope with the speaking rate of the presenter; and this
can result in frustration or sacrificing the essential points for
unnecessary details.
4.3 Do not attempt to write everything
This point is akin to the above except that it centres on what
you should focus upon. In any attempt to take note effort must be
made to identify the main points in order to avoid voluminous and
traumatising writing. The essence of note taking is to compile
13
chunks of information that can serve as memory joggers at the
stage of revision. A well organised note can help you to remember
most of what you have read or listened to in a lecture room. Your
focus in writing must therefore be centred on the main points,
and not the supporting details.
4.4 Leave wide margins
In any lecture class, it is not unlikely that error would occur
either in hearing or jotting down what was heard. It is therefore
considered safe to leave margins wide enough to accommodate
correction after the lecture. Also, you are not to cram your
lines together such that insertion of omitted word would become
difficult. Allowance must be made for such eventualities as time
do not always permit going back to fully rewrite all notes after
lectures.
4.5 Do not embark on lengthy writing
In note taking, you are required to keep abreast of the speaker’s
rate of speech so as not to lose any major point he introduces.
For that reason, your attempt to capture a full mental picture of
the core message in your note should not be allowed metamorphose
into long passage writing. You must be concise in your note
taking without sacrificing the need for completeness of the
message. This can be catered for by the point discussed in the
next topic.
14
4.6 Do not leave your note in a jumble
Your notes must be reorganised as soon as possible after each
lecture. You should dot all your i’s and cross all your t’s.
Wrong spellings are to be corrected and encrypted forms that
could pose problem of interpretation at later stages must be
amplified when the memory is still fresh. This is the essence of
providing margins and spaces on the sheet.
5.0 STRATEGIES OF SUMMARISING AND ENCRYPTING IN NOTE-TAKING
The beauty of a good note is brevity and completeness. To achieve
this quality, you must learn and gain mastery in the arts of
paraphrasing, summarising and encrypting. This however cannot be
done without having enough vocabulary of the language of
instruction. For the purpose of clarity, we shall briefly examine
the three terms mentioned above in this section.
5.1 Paraphrasing
This terms simply put denotes restating what you have read or
heard in alternative words. The Longman Dictionary of English
defines this term as: “a restatement in different words of
(something written or said), especially in words that are easier
to understand.” Oloruntoba-Oju (1998:151) also described
paraphrasing as “restating or rephrasing a sentence or statement
in different words, while preserving the meaning of the original
statement” These different definitions succinctly underscores the
15
need for paraphrasing in note making. It implies that you are to
reduce the message to a language you can easily interpret at a
later stage. Paraphrasing does not necessarily imply summarising;
hence it is just an abstract mental step towards writing down
your note. It is a process that goes on in the mind in a rapid
sequence before writing it down in a summarised or encrypted
form. You are to interpret the core point to yourself and then
use your own language in jotting it down as briefly as possible.
5.2 Summarising
To summarise means to contract an expression. Oloruntoba-Oju
defined summary as “rephrasing, restating or re-presentation of a
text or passage in a reduced form”. That is, you reduce the
number of words used in expressing a given idea or message. It is
also defined by the dictionary as: “to make a short general
statement of the main points of (something longer or more
detailed).” This is closely related to paraphrasing, in that,
there is usually alternation of words based how clearly you are
able to interpret the expression. However, while in paraphrasing
there is no emphasis on brevity, summarising insists on brevity
without losing any part of the message. It is also noteworthy
that the main focus of summarising is the main points with less
interest in tangential details. This is where the central task of
note-taking lies; as elaborate writing is excluded while central
message must be protected. This informs the need for encrypting
as discussed under the next subtopic.
16
5.3 Encrypting
This aspect enjoys different appellations from different
scholars. The choice of this term in this piece however stems
from the fact that different forms are usually being adopted in
attempt to reduce the volume of lexemes in the note-taking
process. Generally speaking, the forms recognised by the
literature as appropriate for note-taking include, abbreviation,
symbols and signs (Chukwuma and Otagburuagu1997:9; Tinuoye,
1998:173; Kolawole and Adelabu, 2004:27 etc.). Banjo and Bisong
(1985:210) also acknowledged the use of symbols in note-taking
but limited the usage of these forms to what they referred to as
“rough jottings". By this phrase, what they seem to believe is
that note-taking should be done in two phases; that is, after the
rough jottings students must settle down for a re-write process
whereby the symbols may be replaced with lexical words. Much as
this work is not meant to query their view in this respect, it is
also plausible to mention at this stage that symbols and signs,
if properly utilised can serve as permanent component parts of a
good note without any need for re-writing or replacement. It is a
matter of choice. More so, when considered in the light of time
factor and the work load confronting students in the tertiary
institutions today, the idea of constructing a rough jotting and
re-writing would rather be discarded in favour of accurate note-
taking with proper management of these abbreviations, symbols and
17
signs. A well articulated note with judicious blends of words
with intelligible symbols and signs can serve the same purpose
with scripts that are written without symbols. The term
encrypting in this paper therefore include the use of
abbreviation, symbols and any other acceptable length reduction
strategy in fast and accurate note-taking. Some of these are
further expatiated in the discourse below:
5.4 Abbreviation
The word abbreviation has been described as shorten forms of
words or making a group of words shorter by missing out letters
or only using the first letter of each word (Longman Dictionary
of English Language and Culture, 2003:2). Similar to this is
acronym which is defined by the same dictionary as “a word made
you form the first letters of the name of something.” That means
that the difference between abbreviation and acronym is that,
while abbreviation merely reduces the length of the structure
into few letters, acronym reduces it to a pronounceable word.
Whichever method is employed, the two are useful tools in
accurate note-taking. In fact, Chukwuma and Otagburuagu (1997:9)
argue that before one can write fast and cover all the substance
of what is said, one would not only write few words, but must
abbreviate many of what is written.
18
On the other hand, Kolawole and Adelabu (2004:28) classified
abbreviation into three categories namely, conventional
abbreviation, subject area abbreviation and personal
abbreviation. This implies that you can derive abbreviation from
the inventories of different subject areas, common linguistic
inventory and personally formulated ones, provided these can be
easily remembered at later stage. For a guide, some relevant
abbreviations and symbols are provided below. Students are free
to add to the list as much as possible through individual
creativity.
5.4.1 Common abbreviation
Below are some common or conventional abbreviations that can be
easily remembered when used in a lecture note.
19
The above list
represents a sample of
the
Abbreviations MeaningsNB (notabenne)
Note well
Pre. PreliminaryNo. (numero) NumberUI University of IbadanEtc(etcetera)
and so on
Cf (confer) CompareViz Namelye.g.(exemplagrate)
for example
Max MaximumPpl PeoplePls Pleaseno. Numberi.e. (idest)
that is,
Sos Save our soulBA Bachelor of ArtsAOB Any other businessGonr. GovernnorGovt. GovernmentUSA United States of
AmericaFGN Federal government of
NigeriaSch. SchoolEdu. EducationNECO National Examinaion
CouncilReg. Registery/
RegistrationVeh. VehicleProf. ProfessorIGP Inspector General of
PoliceAGM Annual General
MeetingAcc. Account Coll. College
20
possibilities in the art of generating abbreviations in note-
taking process.
5.4.2 Subject-area abbreviation
Different subjects in various academic disciplines have their
idiosyncratic behaviours in the aspects of abbreviation
formations. For instance, in science, there are different types
of abbreviations that are specific to different concepts such as,
m=metre, kg.=Kilogramme, km.=Kilometre, cl.=centilitre,
lit.=litre, etc. Similarly in linguistic, we have forms like NP=
Noun Phrase, VP=Verb Phrase, PP=Prepositional phrase,
Adj=adjective, Det.=determiner, ADVP=Adverbial Phrase,
AUX=auxiliary, MHQ= Modifier-Head-Qualifier, SVO=Subject-Verb-
Object, RP=received pronunciation, GA=General American, and so
on (Yusuf 1997; Ababio, 2006; Rogers,2000). The individual’s area
of discipline is the major determiner of his focus in subject-
specific abbreviation. You are therefore required to explore your
subject area for more relevant abbreviations in this regard.
5.4.3 Personal abbreviation
This aspect is a matter of individual skill in lexical
manipulation. Morphological skill already acquired by you can
however help you in developing your own list of intelligible
abbreviations that would not elude your memory in time of need.
Nonetheless you may need to take note of the following inventions
that are associated with modern information technology styles
that are almost becoming popular among students. These have been
21
arbitrarily labelled as Ciber language in some quarters. You can
draw upon them to design your own personal abbreviations.
Dis=this Dem=them2= toUr=your9te= night
4=forU=you4U= For youKud=couldGr8=great
Dat=that cos=becauseDi=the diff.=different
(SMS Interpersonal Texts) You can generate as much as you can conveniently employ withoutfalling into error at the time of revision. 5.5 Symbols Below are some samples of conventional and discipline-specificsymbols that may be of help to you in note-taking process:
5.5.1 Conventional symbols
SYMBOLS MEANINGS +/α plus/and---˃ result in/ leads to/
causes --/--˃ does not result in/
lead to/ cause ˂ less than? is the statement
correct= equals/ is/ are/ have.: Because& And@ At2 To4 ForNyt Night* Wrong construction… Ellipsis ... Therefore& And
22
5.5.2 Discipline-specific symbols
As posited by Jones and Mort (2010), while some symbols are
universally relevant in every discourse event, it is also
possible to employ some discipline-specific symbols in note-
taking activity. Some scientific and linguistic symbols below
illustrate this assumption.
(a) Scientific symbols CO2=carbon dioxideH2O=waterI=IodineIr.=IridiumFe=Iron
Pb=LeadHg=MercuryO=OxygenCa=CalciumZn=Zinc
(Ababio, 2006)
(b) Linguistic symbolsIP=sentenceh=aspirated segmentα=main clause (in a complex sentence)β=subordinate clauseø=delete
*=aberrant formN1=noun phrase∂=syllable = can be rewritten as/= in the environment of
(Malmkjær, 2006)
23
The items in the list provided above are samples that can beemployed as guide to form more on your own as you are confrontedwith note-taking task from time to time.
6.0 FACTORS AFFECTING EFFECTIVE NOTE-TAKING 6.1 Unfavourable lecture atmosphere
When the environment in which a lecture is being held is not
conducive, for instance, an over -crowded lecture room where
students scarcely find a suitable seat and thus cannot settled
down for a comfortable writing, note-taking is usually difficult.
The solution to this is to get to the lecture venue as early as
possible and find a vantage position.
6.2 Lecturers’ refusal to repeat an expression
Some lecturers detest having to repeat their utterances, students
in such situations often find such lectures quite difficult to
enjoy. It is however advisable that appropriate steps prescribed
in this piece be followed in order to reduce the rate of deficit
this lapses can cause in the note taking process. Students should
also note that there are usually elements of individual
differences in human behaviours. Each lecturer should be
identified as he is and accepted with his peculiarity in terms of
communication. This form the background consciousness with which
students should prepare for each lecture. Students should be apt
24
to draw inference from expressions with minimum occurrence of
errors. 6.3 Poor articulation in delivery
Generally speaking, the mode of oral articulation is usually
different from person to person. While some people are naturally
introverts and seldom utter all their words, some speak rather
extravagantly that one would need a lot of effort to sift the
relevant out of the irrelevant. Also, the expressions of some
people are fraught with stammering such that listening to them is
usually a tasking exercise. Stammer can also be divided into
categories. One is characterised by halting in speech while the
other is characterised by abnormally rapid flow of utterance.
Both have their individual negative effect on listening. The
latter however poses greater difficulty to note-taking than the
former. In sum, students are required to master the speaking
habit of their teachers and approach their lectures with dynamic
listening strategies.
6.4 Ignorance of the concept being discussed
Students are usually required to acquaint themselves with the
contents of a given lecture before the class. This is because a
lecture one does not have the vaguest idea of may not be clear
enough to offer one a good understanding. Many students attend
some lecture and come out rather confused than ever. Pre-lecture
reading is the only way out. By this strategy, you will be able
25
to comprehend and obtain the appropriate information to compile a
good note in the lecture.
6.5 Vocabulary deficit
Most people assume erroneously that the term vocabulary is used
to denote difficult words or bombastic language. However,
vocabulary, in a simple term, means the total number of the words
of a given language that you have in your linguistic repertoire
which you can conveniently employ in your communication with
limited error. In other words, it implies the entire words that
you know and can use at any time for communicating your ideas or
interpreting others expressions. So, in order to effectively
interpret what the lecturer is saying and also reduce their
instructions to a contracted volume, there is need for a rich
mental lexicon of English. Students are therefore expected to
form the habit of enriching their vocabularies through deliberate
interaction with their dictionary and taking special note of new
words. Unfamiliar words should be checked up while reading with
the aim of adding them to their mental dictionary. This will go a
long way in reducing students’ stress in note-taking activities.
7.0 ESSENTIALS OF PHONEMIC AWARENESS IN LISTENING SKILLS The term phonemic awareness was originally proposed as one of the
skill required by children at the stage of developing reading
skills. It is assumed to depict the “ability to focus on the
separate, individual sounds in words” (Konza, 2011) Similarly,
Tinajero (2012) described the concept as “the ability to hear,
26
identify, and manipulate the individual sounds, or phonemes, in spoken
words.” This implies that phonemic awareness entails proficiency
in the various mutations that the phonemes pass through in
connected speech. On the other hand, Akinjobi, (2009) draws
attention to the fact that there are more sounds than letters in
the English language; and as a result, some letters are
pronounced as different sounds in different contexts, while some
letters combine to form different sounds. Also, Fatusin (2007:29)
observed that, “Letters in English very often do not consistently
represent sounds in English.” This accentuates the general notion
that there is no consistent spelling-sound correspondence in the
English language.The implication of this for note-taking in oral
discourse is that the L2 learner of English, who is deficient in
phonemic awareness will be prone to misinterpreting many words
and recording wrong information. Students therefore need to be
equipped with knowledge about some notions in phonological rules
in the English language in order to address this problem. Few
examples in phonological rule are provided below as a guide for
tackling this phonological problem in listening and note-taking.
7.1 Morphophonemic rules
This rule is particularly interested in what happens to the
phoneme when a word is “–ed” past tense marker or “–s” plural
marker is added to it. The condition upon which this rule
operates is base on the phonation value of the phoneme preceding
the morphemes involved. The different allomorphs that can be
27
generated by the “–ed” past tense marker are /d/, /id/ and /t/
while the allomorphs generated by “–s” plural marker are, /z/,
/iz/ and /s/. Consider the examples below:
7.1.1 Past tense markers
“-ed” after a voiced sound : This is usually pronounced as /d/
e.g. Bow + past= bowed [baud],
Beg+ past=begged [begd] etc.
“-ed” after a voiceless sound : This is usually pronounced as /t/
e.g. slap + past=slapped [slapt],
park+ past = parked [pakt].
“-ed” after a /t/ or /d/ : This is pronounced as /id/
e.g. waste+ past= wasted [weistid],
wade+ past=waded [weidid]
NB: Our major point of interest here is the /t/ form that is
usually pronounced following the voiceless sound. Students are to
note this to avoid being confused in an oral presentation.
7.1.2 Plural markers
“-s” after a voiced sound : this is usually pronounced as /z/
e.g. boy + s = boys [bͻız],
bag +s=bags [bagz]
“s” after a voiceless sound : this is usually pronounced as /s/
e.g. cat +s= cats [kæts]
28
cup +s+ cups [k˄ps]
“s” after sibilants : thisis pronounced as /Iz/
e.g. box+s=boxes [b˄ksIz]
judge+s=judges [dʒ˄dʒIz]
NB: The point to note here is that letter ‘s’ behaves differently
indifferent phonological environment and could be misquoted if
the individual student is not equipped with this phonemic
awareness.
Other sources phonemic confusion that can affect effective note-
taking are words that fall in the category of homophones.
e.g.feet = [fI:t] fit = [fIt]
tail = [teIl] tale=[teIl]
bid = [bId] bead=[bI:d]
steel = [stI:l] steal=[stI:l]
feel =[fI:l] fill= [fIl]
raw = [rɔ:] roar = [rɔ:]
heel =[hI:l] heal = [hI:l]
you =[ju:] ewe= [ju:]
(Jones 2006)
From the above list of words it is noteworthy that words that are
pronounced similarly can be mistaken for each other if not
properly isolated in the process of listening. Therefore, the
principle prescribed in 4.2 above will enable students to employ
29
contextual clues in demystifying any puzzlement created by this
phonemic symmetry.
Conclusion In this paper, various concepts that are germane to note-taking
practice were explicated with a view to equipping students with
skills required to achieve appreciable success in academic
discourse. If properly understood and utilized, the various
concepts discussed under different topics like: basic steps in
note-taking, principles of good note taking, basic rules of note-
taking, strategies of summarising and encrypting, factors
affecting effective note-taking and essentials of phonemic
awareness in listening skills will go a long way in enhancing the
overall performance of students in their various subject areas in
tertiary institutions.
Reference
Ababio, O.Y. (2006). New School CHEMISTRY for Senior Secondary Schools.
Ibadan:
AFRICANA FIRST PUBLISHERS LIMITED.
Akinjobi, A. (2008) Spelling Cued Mispronunciation in Nigerian English.
Banjo, L.A.& Bisong, J.O. (1985:210). Developmental English. Ibadan:
Spectrum Books
30
Limited.
Chukwuma, H. & Otagburuagu, E. (1997:9). English for Academic Purposes.
Onisha:
AFRICANA-FEP PUBLISHERS LTD.
Jones, D. (2006). CAMBRIDGE English Pronouncing Dictionary. (17th ed.).
Cambridge.
Cambridge University Press. Jones, G.& Mort, P. (2010) Note-Taking Skill: An Introduction.
Online Publication. Retrieved
November 2013. http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au
Kolawole, C.O. and Adelabu, B. (2004). A Basic Texton Use of English.Ibadan: Clemeve Media
Konsult.
Konza, D. (2011). Phonological Awareness. Retrieved December 2013from
http//www.decs.sa.gov.au/literacy
Longman, A. W. (2003). Longman Dictionary of English Language and Culture.
England:
Person Education Limited.
Malmkjær, K. (ed.) (2006). THE LINGUISTICS ENCYCLOPEDIA. NewYork.
Online
31
Publication. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/.
Oloruntoba-Oju, T. and Alebiosu, A. T. (1998). ListeningCommunication. In Effective
Communication in Higher Education. Adegbija, E. (ed.) Ilorin: TheGeneral Studies Unit, University of Ilorin.
Oyerokan, S.O. (1993). Listening comprehension skills.Ibadan: TheDepartment of Adult
Education,University of Ibadan
Rogers, H. (2000) THE SOUNDS OF LANGUAGE: AN ITRODUCTION TO PHONETICS.
England: Pearson Education Limited
Royster, J.J. & Lester, M. (1996). WRITER’S CHOICE: GRAMMAR AND
COMPOSITION.
New York: GLENCOE/McGraw-Hill.
Tinajero, J. V. (2013) Teaching the Fundamentals: Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Decoding,
and Spelling. Online Journal. Retrieved November 2013 from http//www.ngsp.net
Tinuoye, M.O. (1998). Note-Taking.in Effective Communication in HigherEducation. Adegbija,
E. (ed.) Ilorin: The General Studies Unit, University ofIlorin.
Yusuf, O. (1997). Fundamentals of Syntax and Study of Nigerian Languages.
Ijebu-Ode:
SEBIOTIMO PUBLICATIONS.