arX

iv:1

705.

0691

0v2

[gr

-qc]

17

Oct

201

7

Emerging Anisotropic Compact Starsin f(G, T ) Gravity

M. Farasat Shamir ∗and Mushtaq Ahmad †

National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences,Lahore Campus, Pakistan.

Abstract

The possible emergence of compact stars has been investigatedin the recently introduced modified Gauss-Bonnet f(G, T ) gravity,where G is the Gauss-Bonnet term and T is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor [1]. Specifically, for this modified f(G, T ) the-ory, the analytic solutions of Krori and Barua have been applied toanisotropic matter distribution. To determine the unknown constantsappearing in Krori and Barua metric, the well-known three models ofthe compact stars namely 4U1820-30, Her X-I, and SAX J 1808.4-3658have been used. The analysis of the physical behavior of the compactstars has been presented and the physical features like energy densityand pressure, energy conditions, static equilibrium, stability, measureof anisotropy, and regularity of the compact stars, have been discussed.

Keywords: f(G, T ) Gravity; Krori and Barua; Compact Stars.PACS: 04.50.Kd; 04.20.Jb.

1 Introduction

In astrophysics, compact stars are generally being referred to as the whitedwarfs, neutron stars including the hybrid and quark stars, and the black

∗farasat.shamir@nu.edu.pk†mushtaq.sial@nu.edu.pk

1

holes. White dwarfs and neutron stars originated due to the degeneracypressure produced by the fundamental particles responsible for their forma-tion. These stars are massive but volumetrically smaller objects, thereforewith high densities. Usually, the exact nature of these compact stars is notknown to us but they are believed to be the massive objects with a smallradius. Excluding black holes, all the other types of compact stars are some-times also known as the degenerate stars. In general relativity (GR), ananalysis of configured equilibrium is essential due to the reason of compactstars having huge mass and density. This can be started in a general rela-tivistic way by considering the Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations [2] for staticspherically symmetric and hydrostatic equilibrium, given as

dp

dr= −G

(mc2 + 4pπr3)(ρc2 + p)

r2c4 − 2Gmc2rand

dm

dr= 4ρπr2, (1)

where p, ρ, and m is the pressure, density, and mass of the star respectively,varying with radial coordinate r. At r = R ( the coordinate radius of thecompact star), the total mass of compact star is determined as

M(R) =

∫ R

0

4πr2ρdr. (2)

The combination of these Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations with the equationof the sate (EoS) parameter ω = p

ρwhen solved numerically results into

different configurations of the compact stars with divisions of low and highdensities [3, 4].

Schwarzschild [5] was the pioneer to present the spherically symmetricexact solutions of Einstein field equations. The outcome of the first solutionwas the exploration of space-time singularity which gave the idea of a blackhole. The second non-trivial solution predicted the bounded compactnessparameter i.e., µ(R) = 2M(R)

R< 8

9in hydrostatic equilibrium for some static

and spherically symmetric configured structure [6]. Investigation of compactstars (neutron stars, dark stars, quarks, gravastars, and black holes) has be-come now an interesting research pursuit in astrophysics despite being notthe new one. Baade and Zwicky [7] studied the compact stellar objects andargued that supernova may turn into a smaller dense compact object whichcame true later on after the discovery of pulsars which are highly magnetizedrotating neutrons [8, 9]. Ruderman [10] was the first one to explore thatat the core of the compact stars, the nuclear density turns anisotropic. A

2

number of investigations have been made to find the solutions of the fieldequations for spherically symmetric anisotropic configurations in differentcontexts [11]-[13]. The pressure of the fluid sphere splits into the tangentialand radial pressures in anisotropic configurations. Different investigations re-veal that the repulsive forces which construct the compact stars, are produceddue to anisotropy. Kalam et al. [14] showed that the Krori and Barua metric[15] establishes the necessary conditions for the advocacy of an effective andstable approach in modelling the compact objects. From an integrated Tol-man Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) equation, the numerical simulations maybe used to study the nature of the compact stars, using EoS parameter.Rahaman et al. [16, 17] used EoS Chaplygin gas to explore their physicalcharacteristics by extending Krori and Barua models. Mak and Harko [18]used some standard models for spherically symmetric compact objects andexplored exact solutions to find the physical parameters such as the energydensity, radial and tangential pressures concluding that inside these stars,the parameters would remain positive and finite. Hossein et al. [19] studiedthe effects on anisotropic stars due to cosmological constant. Different phys-ical properties such as mass, radius, and moment of inertia of neutron starshas been investigated and a comprehensive comparison has been establishedwith GR and modified theories of gravity [20]. Some interesting investiga-tions related to the structure of slow rotating neutron stars in R2 gravity areaccomplished by making use of two distinct hadronic and a strange matterEOS parameter [21]. For a comprehensive study, some fascinating resultscan be seen in [22]-[28].

As an alternative to the theory of GR, modified theories of gravity haveplayed an important and pivotal role to reveal the hidden facts about theaccelerating expansion of the universe. After being motivated by the orig-inal theory and using the complex lagrangian, modified theories of gravitylike f(R), f(R, T ), f(G), and f(R,G) have been structured, where R is theRicci scalar, G is the Gauss-Bonnet invariant term, and T is the trace ofenergy momentum tensor. Some reviews and important discussions relatingto different modified theories of gravity have been published by different re-searchers [29]-[42]. Das et al. [43] presented exact conformal solutions todescribe the interior of a star in modified teleparallel gravity. In anotherwork, Das et al. [44] explored several physical features of the model admit-ting conformal motion to describe the behavior of the compact stars usingmodified f(R, T ) gravity. Sharif and Yousuf [45] investigated the stabilityconditions of collapsing object by considering the non-static and spherically

3

symmetric space-time. The field equations of f(R, T ) modified theory havebeen explored by implementing the perturbation approach [46]. The possibleformation of compacts stars in modified theory of gravity by using the Kroriand Barua metric for spherically symmetric anisotropic compact stars hasbeen discussed [47, 48]. In a recently published paper [1], Sharif and Ikrampresented a new modified f(G, T ) theory of gravity and studied differentenergy conditions for Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) universe. Theyfound that the massive test particles follow non-geodesic geometry lines dueto the presence of an extra force. It is being expected that the theory maydescribe the late-time cosmic acceleration for some special choices of f(G, T )gravity models. We discussed the Noether symmetry approach to find theexact solutions of the field equations in f(G, T ) theory of gravity [49]. In another paper [50], we investigated the same modified Gauss-Bonnet f(G, T )gravity and used the Noether symmetry methodology to discuss some cos-mologically important f(G, T ) gravity models with anisotropic backgroundreported for locally rotationally symmetric Bianchi type I universe. We usedtwo models to explore the exact solutions and found that the specific modelsof modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity may be used to reconstruct ΛCDM cosmol-ogy without involving any cosmological constant. Thus it seems interestingto further explore the universe in this theory.

This paper is aimed to investigate the possible emergence of compact starsby constructing some viable stellar solutions in f(G, T ) theory of gravity bychoosing some specific models. The plan of our present study is as follows:In section 2, we give the fundamental formalism of f(G, T ) gravity withanisotropic matter distribution. Section 3 is dedicated for the matching ofthe metric conditions. Some physical features of the present study in contextof f(G, T ) gravity model under consideration are given in Section 4. Lastly,we present some conclusive discussions.

2 Anisotropic Matter Distribution in f(G, T )Gravity

The general action for the modified f(G, T ) is [1],

A =1

2κ2

∫

d4x√−g[R + f(G,T)] +

∫

d4x√−gLM , (3)

4

where the function f(G, T ) consists of the Gauss-Bonnet term G and thetrace of the energy-momentum tensor T , κ denotes the coupling constant,g is for the determinant of the metric tensor, R is the Ricci Scalar, andLM represents matter part of the Lagrangian. The Gauss-Bonnet term G isdefined as

G = R2 − 4RζηRζη +RζηµνR

ζηµν , (4)

where Rζηµν , and Rζη is the Reimann and Ricci tensors, respectively. Thevariation of Eq.(3) with respect to gζη, and by setting κ = 1, gives thefollowing fourth order non-linear field equations

Gζη = [2Rgζη∇2 + 2R∇ζ∇η + 4gζηRµν∇µ∇ν + 4Rζη∇2 −

4Rµζ∇η∇µ − 4Rµ

η∇ζ∇µ − 4Rζµην∇µ∇ν ]fG +1

2gζηf − [Tζη +Θζη]×

fT − [2RRζη − 4RµζRµη − 4RζµηνR

µν + 2Rµνδζ Rηµνδ]fG + κ2Tζη, (5)

where � = ∇2 = ∇ζ∇ζ is the d’Alembertian operator, Gζη = Rζη − 12gζηR

is the Einstein tensor, Θζη = gµν δTµν

δgζη, f ≡ f(G, T ), fG ≡ ∂f(G,T)

∂G, and fT ≡

∂f(G,T)∂T

. Einstein equations can be reawakened by putting simply f(G,T) = 0whereas field equations for f(G) are reproduced by replacing f(G,T) withf(G) in Eq.(5). The energy-momentum tensor denoted by Tζη can be definedas

Tζη = − 2√−g

δ(√−gLM)

δgζη. (6)

Moreover, the metric dependent energy-momentum tensor may have the form

Tζη = gζηLM − 2∂LM

∂gζη. (7)

The usual anisotropic energy momentum tensor Tζη is given as

Tζη = (ρ+ pt)VζVη − ptgζη + (pr − pt)ξζξη, (8)

where pt and pr represents the tangential and radial pressures respectivelywhile ρ denotes the energy density. The four velocity is denoted by Vζ andthe radial four vector by ξα, satisfying

V α = e−a2 δα0 , V αVα = 1, ξα = e

−b2 δα1 , ξαξα = −1. (9)

5

In this paper, we have chosen specifically the following f(G, T ) model [49]

f(G, T ) = f1(G) + f2(T ), (10)

where f1(G) is an analytic function comprised of Gauss-Bonnet term. Inparticular, we consider f1(G) = αGn, a power law model of f(G) gravityproposed by Cognola et al. [51] with α being an arbitrary real constant,and n a positive real number. Here we take f2(T ) = λT, with λ being somepositive real number. Further, for the investigations on the compact starswe take the static, spherically symmetric space-time as

ds2 = ea(r)dt2 − eb(r)dr2 − r2dθ2 − r2sin2θdφ2. (11)

We parameterize metric (11) by taking a(r) = Br2+C and b(r) = Ar2, givenby Krori and Barua [15] and with the help of some physical assumptions,the arbitrary constants A,B and C will be calculated. The above set offunctions are established to reach a singularity free structure for compactstars. Therefore, our main concern is to present these functions to the metricin a way to achieve the structure for the compact star under this extendedmodel, free from the singularities in the neighbourhood of r. To investigatethe existence of the compact stars for the model f(G, T ) = αGn + λT, wehave considered α = 1, λ = 2, and n = 2. For these parametric values, theenergy density and all the energy conditions remain positive for the modelunder investigation. It is worth mentioning here that one may opt for someother choices of these values for further analysis. The explicit expressions forthe energy density ρ, radial pressure pr, and the tangential pressure pt are

6

obtained as

ρ =e−2b

8r4(1 + λ)(1 + 2λ)

[

8eb(−1 + eb)r2(1 + 2λ)− 4e2br4(1 + λ)f1 (12)

+ fG

{

− 16(−1 + eb)2λ+ r2{

r2(1 + 2λ)a′4 − 2r2(1 + 2λ)a′3b′

− 4a′b′{

2(−3 + eb)(1 + λ) + r2(1 + 2λ)a′′ + a′2{

8(λ+ eb(1 + λ))}

+ r2(1 + 2λ)(b′2 + 4a′′)}

+ 4{

− 2λb′2 + a′′{4(−1 + eb)(1 + λ)}}

+ r2(1 + 2λ)a′′}}

+ 2r{

4f ′G{−8(2 + 5λ) + r{b′(10 + 27λ− 2rλb′)}

− r{8 + 18λ+ r(2 + 3λ)b′}a′′} − 8r(2 + 5λ)(1− 2rb′ + r2a′′)f ′′G

+ r2a′2{

ebrλ− 2(8 + 18λ+ r(2 + 3λ)b′)f ′G − 4r(2 + 5λ)f ′′

G

}

+ 2eb{

16(2 + 5λ)f ′G + 2rb′{r + 2rλ+ (2 + 3λ)f ′

G}+ r3λa′′ + 4r(2 + 5λ)f ′′G

}

+ ra′{

2(−32− 74λ+ rb′(2λ+ r(2 + 3λ)b′))}

f ′G − ebλ

{

r(−4 + rb′) + 4f ′G

}

+ 4r{

− 2(4 + 9λ) + r(2 + 5λ)b′f ′′G

}}]

,

pr =e−2b

8r4(1 + λ)(1 + 2λ)

[

− 4e2br4(1 + λ)f1 + fG

{

− 16(−1 + eb)2λ (13)

+ r2(

r2(1 + 2λ)a′4 − 2r2(1 + 2λ)a′3b′ − 4a′b′{2(−3 + eb)(1 + λ)

+ r2(1 + 2λ)a′′}+ a′2{

8(−1 + eb)(1 + λ) + r2(1 + 2λ)(b′2 + 4a′′)}

+ 4{

2(1 + λ)b′2 + a′′{4(−1 + eb)(1 + λ) + r2(1 + 2λ)a′′}})}

+ 2r{4eb(−1 + eb)}r(1 + 2λ) + 4f ′G

{

− 8λ+ r{

− b′(4 + λ+ 2rλb′)

+ rλ(−2 + rb′a′′) + r2λa′2{2(−2 + rb′)f ′G + r(eb − 4f ′′

G)} − 8rλ(1− 2rb′

+ r2a′′)f ′′G + ra′

{

− 2{12 + 34λ+ rb′(8 + 14λ+ rλb′)}f ′G

+ eb{

− r(4 + 4λ+ rλb′) + 4(2 + 3λ)f ′G

}

+ 4rλ(−2 + rb′)f ′′G

}

+ 2eb[2{8λ+ r(4 + 7λ)b′}f ′G + rλ(r2a′′ + 4f ′′

G)]}}]

,

7

pt =e−2b

4r4(1 + λ)(1 + 2λ)

[

− 2e2br4(1 + λ)f1 + 2fG

{

4(−1 + eb)2(1 + λ) (14)

+ r2{

{−1 + 2eb(1 + λ)}a′2 − 2(−3 + eb)(1 + λ)a′b′ + b′2 + 4(−1 + eb)(1

+ λ)a′′}}

− r{

4f ′G [8λ+ r{b′(−7λ− 2r(1 + λ)b′) + r(2 + 6λ

+ r(2 + 3λ)b′)a′′}] + 8rλ(1− 2rb′ + r2a′′)f ′′G + 2eb{−16λf ′

G − rb′(r + 2rλ

− 2λf ′G) + r3(1 + λ)a′′ − 4rλf ′′

G}+ r2a′2{

ebr(1 + λ) + 2{

2 + 6λ

+ r(2 + 3λ)b′}

f ′G + 4rλf ′′

G

}

+ ra′ − 2[−10λ+ rb′{2 + 6λ

+ r(2 + 3λ)b′}]f ′G + eb[−r{−2 + r(1 + λ)b′}+ 4λf ′

G ] + 4r(2 + 6λ− rλb′)f ′′G

}]

,

where prime denotes the radial derivative.

3 MatchingWith Schwarzschild’s Exterior Met-

ric

Whatever the geometry of the star is, either derived internally or externally,the intrinsic boundary metric remains the same. Thus, confirming that thecomponents of the metric tensor irrespective of the coordinate system acrossthe surface of the boundary will remain continuous. No doubt, in GR, theSchwarzschild solutions have been pioneer in guiding us to choose from thediverse possibilities of the matching conditions while investigating the stellarcompact objects. Now when we come to the case of modified theories ofgravity, modified TOV equations with zero pressure and energy density, thesolution outside the star can differ from Schwarzschild’s solution. However,it is expected that the solutions of the modified TOV equations with energydensity and pressure (may be non-zero) may accommodate Schwarzschild’ssolution with some specific choice of f(G, T ) gravity model. Perhaps this isthe reason that Birkhoff’s theorem may not hold in modified gravity. Thedetailed investigation of the issue in the context of f(G, T ) gravity can be aninteresting task. Many authors have considered Schwarzschild solution forthis purpose giving some interesting results [52]-[55]. Now to solve the fieldequations under the restricted boundary conditions at r = R, the pressurepr = 0, the interior metric (11) requires these matching conditions. Thiscan be done by taking a smooth match at r = R to Schwarzschild’s exterior

8

metric, given by

ds2 =(

1− 2M

r

)

dt2 −(

1− 2M

r

)−1

dr2 − r2(dθ2 + sin2θdφ2), (15)

yielding

g−tt = g+α , g−rr = g+rr,∂g−α∂r

=∂g+α∂r

, (16)

where (+) corresponds to exterior solution and (−) to the interior solution.Now from the comparison of exterior and interior metrics, the constants A,B, and C are obtained as

A =−1

R2ln(

1− 2M

R

)

, (17)

B =M

R3

(

1− 2M

R

)

, (18)

C = ln(

1− 2M

R

)

− M

R

(

1− 2M

R

)

. (19)

The approximated values of the mass M and radius R of the compact starsHer X-1, SAX J1808.4-3658 and 4U1820-30 are used to calculate the valuesof constants A and B [56, 57]. The result µ = M(R)

Rdefines the compactness

of the star and the expression Zs = (1 − 2µ)−1/2 − 1 determines the surfaceredshift Zs. For the compact stars under consideration, the values of Zs havebeen given below in table as follows.

Compact Stars M R(km) µ = MR

A(km−2) B(km−2) Zs

Her X-1 0.88M⊙ 7.7 0.168 0.006906276428 0.004267364618 0.23SAXJ1808.4-3658 1.435M⊙ 7.07 0.299 0.01823156974 0.01488011569 0.57

4U1820-30 2.25M⊙ 10.0 0.332 0.01090644119 0.009880952381 0.73

Table 1: The approximate values of the masses M , radii R, compactness µ,and the constants A, and B for the compact stars Her X-1, SAXJ 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30

9

Now making use of Krori and Barua metric, Eqs. (12)-(14) take the form

ρ =e−2Ar2

2r4(1 + λ)(1 + 2λ)

[

4{

− λ− e2Ar2λ+ 2eAr2{λ+Br2(1 (20)

+ (−A +B)r2)(1 + λ) + r2{−2A2r2λ+ 2B(−1 + 3Ar2)(1 + λ)

+ B4r6(1 + 2λ)− 2B3r4(−1 + Ar2)(1 + 2λ) +B2r2(1 + 4λ

+ Ar2(−2 + Ar2)(1 + 2λ))}}}

fG + r{

− 4(2 + 5λ) + r2(10A− 24B

− 4B(A+ 2B)r2 + 4A(A−B)Br4 + {27A− 55B − 2(2A2 + 2AB

+ 9B2)r2 + 6A(A− B)Br4}λ) + eAr2[8 + 20λ+ r2(−Bλ + A(2

+ 3λ))]f ′G + r(eAr2(−2 + 4Ar2 − 4λ+ 2r2(4A+ 3B +B(−A

+ B)r2)λ+ eAr2(2 + 4λ− 8nr2

× 1

r2n

(

Be−2Ar2(1 + (−3A +B)r2 + eAr2(−1 + (A− B)r2)))n

× α(1 + λ))) + 4(−2− 5λ+ eAr2(2 + 5λ) + 2r2(A(2 +Br2)(2 + 5λ)

− B(6 + 14λ+Br2(2 + 5λ))))f ′′G)}]

,

pr =e−2Ar2

2r4(1 + λ)(1 + 2λ)

[

4{

− (−1 + eAr2)2λ+ 2A2r4(1 + λ) (21)

− 2Br2(1− 3Ar2 + eAr2(−1 + Ar2))(1 + λ) +B4r8(1 + 2λ)

− 2B3r6(−1 + Ar2)(1 + 2λ) +B2r4(−1 + 2eAr2(1 + λ) + Ar2(−2

+ Ar2)(1 + 2λ))}

fG + r(eAr2r(eAr2(2 + 4λ− 8nr2

× 1

r2n

(

Be−2Ar2(1 + (−3A+B)r2 + eAr2(−1 + (A−B)r2)))n

× α(1 + λ))− 2(1 + 2λ+Br2(2 + (1 + (A− B)r2)λ)))

+ 4(−4λ− r2(4A+ 6B + 8ABr2 + (A+ 19B + 2(2A2 + 6AB +B2)r2

+ 2A(A−B)Br4)λ) + eAr2(4λ+ r2(B(2 + 3λ) + A(4 + 7λ))))f ′G

+ 4r(−1 + eAr2 + 2(A− B)r2(2 +Br2))λf ′′G)]

,

10

pt =e−2Ar2

2r4(1 + λ)(1 + 2λ)

[

4(1 + A2r4 − B2r4 + λ+ e2Ar2(1 + λ) (22)

+ 2Br2(−1 + 3Ar2)(1 + λ) + 2eAr2(−1 +Br2 +B(−A +B)r4)

× (1 + λ))fG + r(eAr2r3(−8neAr2 × 1

r2n

(

Be−2Ar2(1 + (−3A +B)r2

+ eAr2(−1 + (A−B)r2)))n

α(1 + λ)− 2B(2 + λ+Br2(1 + λ)) + 2A

× (1 + 2λ+Br2(1 + λ))) + 4(4(−1 + eAr2)λ+ r2(A(−(−7 + eAr2)λ

+ 4Ar2(1 + λ))− 2B2r2(1 + 3λ+ Ar2(2 + 3λ)) +B(−2− (11 + eAr2))λ

+ 2Ar2(−1 + Ar2(2 + 3λ)))))f ′G − 4r(λ− eAr2λ+ 2r2(B − 2Aλ

+ B(4 + (−A+B)r2)λ))f ′′G)]

,

where (23)

f1 = α[e−2Ar2(−16ABr2 + 2(1− eAr2)(4B − 4ABr2 + 4B2r2))

r2

]n

,

f ′G =

1

r3

[

2−2+3nBe−2Ar2(−1 + n)n(Be−2Ar2(1 + (−3A +B)r2 (24)

+ eAr2(−1 + (A−B)r2)))r2−2+n

(−1 + 6A2r4 − 2A(r2 +Br4)

+ eAr2(1 + Ar2 + A(−A +B)r4))α]

,

f ′′G =

4−1+2ne3Ar2(−1 + n)nα

B(−1 + (3A− B)r2 + eAr2(1 + (−A +B)r2))3(25)

× 1

r2n

(

− Be−3Ar2

2 (Ar2cosh(Ar2

2)) + (1 + (2A+B)r2)sinh(

Ar2

2)))n

× (2− 4n− 3(2B + A(−9 + 4n))r2 + 2A(9B − 6Bn+ A(−21 + 10n))r4

+ A(3B2 − 16ABn+ A2(−15 + 32n))r6 − 2A2(3A2 − 4AB +B2)

× (−3 + 4n)r8 + (−2 + 4n + 3(2B + A(−9 + 4n))r2 + 2A(16A− 9B

− 9An + 6Bn)r4 + A(−3B2 + A2(33− 52n) + 2AB(−3 + 10n))r6

+ 2A2(37A2 − 26AB + 5B2)(−1 + n)r8)cosh(Ar2) + Ar2(11− 4n

+ 2(B(3− 2n) + A(−12 + 7n))r2 + (B2 + 2AB(1− 6n) + A2(−27

+ 44n))r4 − 2A(7A− 3B)(5A− B)(−1 + n)r6)sinh(Ar2)).

Now we investigate the nature and some interesting features of the compactstar, specifically for the assumed model of f(G, T ) gravity.

11

2 4 6 8 10r

0.005

0.006

0.007

0.008

ρ

2 4 6 8 10r

0.010

0.015

0.020

ρ

2 4 6 8 10r

0.008

0.010

0.012

0.014

ρ

Figure 1: Plot of the density evolution of the strange star candidate Her X-1,SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by (left to right) 1st, 2nd,and 3rd graphs, respectively.

2 4 6 8 10r

0.00105

0.00110

0.00115

pr

2 4 6 8 10r

0.00210

0.00215

0.00220

0.00225

pr

2 4 6 8 10r

0.00105

0.00110

0.00115

0.00120

0.00125

pr

Figure 2: Plots of the radial pressure evolution of the strange star candidatesHer X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by (left to right)1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs, respectively.

4 Physical Aspects of f(G, T ) Gravity Model

In this section, some interesting physical aspects of the compact stars suchas the energy density and pressure evolutions, energy conditions, equilibriumconditions, stability and adiabatic index analysis, compactness, and redshiftanalysis shall be discussed.

4.1 Energy Density and Pressure Evolutions

The plot of the energy density for the strange star candidate Her X-1 (Figure1) shows that as r → 0, ρ goes to maximum, and this in fact indicates thehigh compactness of the core of the star validating that our model under

12

2 4 6 8 10r

0.0008

0.0009

0.0010

0.0011

pt

2 4 6 8 10r

0.0010

0.0015

0.0020

pt

2 4 6 8 10r

0.0005

0.0006

0.0007

0.0008

0.0009

0.0010

pt

Figure 3: Plots of the transverse pressure evolution of the strange star can-didates Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by (leftto right) 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs, respectively.

2 3 4 5 6 7r

-0.0005

-0.0004

-0.0003

-0.0002

-0.0001

dρ

dr

2 3 4 5 6 7r

-0.0020

-0.0015

-0.0010

dρ

dr

2 4 6 8 10r

-0.0010

-0.0008

-0.0006

-0.0004

dρ

dr

Figure 4: Plots of dρdr

with increasing radius of the strange star candidatesHer X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by (left to right)1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs, respectively.

investigation is viable for the outer region of the core. The other two graphsin the same row provide us with similar sort of conclusions. Furthermore,from the other plots of the anisotropic radial pressure pr (Figure 2), it isevident that the radius of the star for this model is R = 10 km which furtherwhen used, gives us the density of 1.5828 × 1015 g cm−3, a high value witha small radius of 10 km, showing that our f(G, T ) model is compatible tothe structure of ultra-compact star [10, 59]. A comparison of this with thealready existing data, labels this compact star as quark/strange star [60]. Allthe three plots in Figure (3) indicate that the tangential pressure pt remainspositive and finite and show their decreasing behavior, which is required forthe viability of the compact star model.

The variations of the radial derivatives of the density and radial pressure

13

2 4 6 8 10r

-0.000025

-0.000020

-0.000015

-0.000010

-5.×10-6

d�r

dr

2 4 6 8 10r

-0.00010

-0.00005

0.00005

��r

dr

2 4 6 8 10r

-0.000025

-0.000020

-0.000015

-0.000010

-5.×10-6

��r

dr

Figure 5: Variations of dprdr

with increasing radius of the strange star candi-date Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by (left toright) 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs, respectively.

are shown in Figures (4) and (5) respectively. One can see the decreasingevolution of the first r-derivatives i.e dρ

dr< 0 and dpr

dr< 0. It may be noted here

that at r = 0, these derivatives just disappear except of the radial pressurefor the SAX J 1808.4-3658 candidate. The mathematical calculations for thesecond derivative test both for ρ and pr tell us that d2ρ

dr2< 0 and d2pr

dr2< 0,

indicating the maximum values of the density and radial pressure at thecenter. This further suggests the compact nature of the star.

4.2 Energy Conditions

For the viability of the model, the energy bounds must be satisfied dueto their significant importance in analysing the theoretical data. NEC (nullenergy conditions), WEC (weak energy conditions), SEC (strong energy con-ditions), and DEC (dominant energy conditions) have been given as

NEC : ρ+ pr ≥ 0, ρ+ pt ≥ 0,

WEC : ρ ≥ 0, ρ+ pr ≥ 0, ρ+ pt ≥ 0,

SEC : ρ+ pr ≥ 0, ρ+ pt ≥ 0, ρ+ pr + 2pt ≥ 0,

DEC : ρ > |pr|, ρ > |pt|.

The evolution of all these energy conditions have been well satisfied as rep-resented graphically for the strange star candidate Her X-1 in Figure (6).Hence our solutions are physically viable.

14

2 4 6 8 10r

0.005

0.006

0.007

0.008

ρ

2 4 6 8 10r

0.006

0.007

0.008

0.009

pr +ρ

2 4 6 8 10r

0.006

0.007

0.008

0.009

pt +ρ

2 4 6 8 10r

0.008

0.009

0.010

0.011

0.012

pr +pt +ρ

2 4 6 8 10r

0.004

0.005

0.006

0.007

ρ-pr

2 4 6 8 10r

0.0045

0.0050

0.0055

0.0060

0.0065

0.0070

0.0075

ρ-pt

Figure 6: Plots of energy conditions with respect to radius r (km) of thestrange star candidate Her X-1.

4.3 Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) Equation

In anisotropic case, the generalized TOV equation is given as

MG(r)(ρ+ pr)

r2e

b−a2 +

dprdr

− 2

r(pt − pr) = 0, (26)

where

MG(r) =1

2r2e

a−b2 a′ (27)

is the gravitational mass of a sphere of radius r. Now putting Eq.(27) intoEq.(26), it follows

−a′

2(ρ+ pr)−

dprdr

+2

r(pt − pr) = 0. (28)

Eq.(28) gives the information about the stellar configuration equilibrium un-der the combined effect of different forces like the anisotropic force Fa, thehydrostatic force Fh, and the gravitational force Fg. Their summation tozero eventually describes the equilibrium condition of the form

Fg + Fh + Fa = 0, (29)

15

Fg

Fh

Fa

2 4 6 8 10r

0.0001

0.0002

0.0003

0.0004

0.0005

Fi

Figure 7: The plot of gravitational force (Fg), hydrostatic force (Fh) andanisotropic force (Fa) for the strange star candidate Her X-1 with respect tothe radial coordinate r (km).

where

Fg = −a′

2(ρ+ pr), (30)

Fh = −dprdr

,

Fa =2

r(pt − pr).

From Figure (7), it can be noticed that under the mutual effect of the threeforces Fg, Fh and Fa, the static equilibrium might be achieved. It is men-tioned here that at some point if pr = pt then Fa = 0, which suggests thatthe equilibrium becomes independent of the anisotropic force Fa.

4.4 Stability Analysis

For the stability, the radial and transversal sound speeds denoted by v2sr andv2st respectively, should satisfy the bounds, 0 ≤ v2sr ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ v2st ≤ 1 [61],where dpr

dρ= v2sr and dpt

dρ= v2st. It can be seen from the Figures (8) and (9)

that the evolution of the radial and transversal sound speeds for strange starcandidate Her X-1 are within the bounds of stability as discussed, but in thecase of SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30 strange star candidates, the radialsound speeds evolution which is against the radial coordinate r temporarilyviolates these stability conditions. However, for the same candidates the

16

2 4 6 8 10r

0.035

0.040

0.045

0.050

v2s�

2 4 6 8 10 12 14r

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

v2sr

5 10 15 20 25 30r

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

v2sr

Figure 8: Variations of v2sr with respect radius r (km) of the strange starcandidate Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by (leftto right) 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs, respectively.

2 4 6 8 10r

0.115

0.120

0.125

0.130

0.135

v2��

2 4 6 8 10r

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

v2sr

2 4 6 8 10r

0.062

0.064

0.066

0.068

0.070

0.072

v2�

Figure 9: Variations of v2st with respect radius r (km) of the strange starcandidate Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by (leftto right) 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs, respectively.

17

2 4 6 8 10 12r

0��

0.080

0.081

0.082

�����

0.084

�����

v2�� - v2sr

2 4 6 8 10r

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

v2�� - v2sr

2 4 6 8 10r

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

v2�� - v2sr

Figure 10: Variations of v2st -v2sr with respect to radius r (km) of the strange

star candidate Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by(left to right) 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs, respectively.

transversal sound speeds are satisfied. Within the matter distribution, theestimation of the potentially stable and unstable eras can be had from thedifferences of the propagations of the sound speeds which is the expressionv2st− v2sr satisfying the inequality 0 < |v2st− v2sr| < 1. This can be seen clearlyfrom the plots of Figure (10). Thus, overall the stability may be attained forcompact stars under f(G, T ) gravity model, particularly for the strange starcandidate Her X-1.

4.5 Adiabatic Index Analysis

For the case of anisotropic fluid spherical star, as proposed in [62, 63], thestability depends on the adiabatic index γ, and for the radial and tangentialcases, we respectively have

γr =ρ+ prpr

dprdρ

and γt =ρ+ ptpt

dptdρ

. (31)

The stability of a Newtonian sphere should be satisfied if γ > 43, and γ = 4

3

is the condition for the occurrence of neutral equilibrium [64]. Due to thepresence of the effective pressure, the anisotropic relativistic sphere obeysmore complicated stability condition given as

γ >4

3+[4

3

pt0 − pr0|p′r0|r

+8π

3

ρ0pr0r

|p′r0|]

max, (32)

where ρ0, pt0 , and pr0 are the initial energy density, tangential pressure, andradial pressure in static equilibrium respectively satisfying Eq. (26). In our

18

2 4 6 8 10r

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

M(r)

Figure 11: Evolution of mass-function M(r) for the strange star candidateHer X-1 with respect to the radial coordinate r (km).

case, the adiabatic index has been calculated analytically for strange starcandidate Her X-1 , giving us γr = 1.3757 and γt = 1.0597, which shows thecomplete stability in radial case but some deviation in the tangential case.

4.6 Mass-Radius Relationship

The mass of the compact star as a function of radius r is given as

M(r) = 4

∫ r

0

πr2ρdr. (33)

It can be seen clearly from the profile of the mass function given in Figure(11) that the mass of the star is directly proportional to the radius, andM(r) → 0 as r → 0, which depicts that the mass function is regular atthe centre of the star. Moreover, for the spherically symmetric anisotropicperfect fluid case, the ratio of the mass to the radius, according to Buchdahl[6] should be bounded like 2M

r≤ 8

9. In our case, the situation is very good

as we get 2Mr

= 0.4987 and the condition is clearly satisfied.

4.7 Compactness and Redshift Analysis

Compactness µ(r) of the star is expressed as

µ(r) =4

r

∫ r

0

πr2ρdr. (34)

19

2 4 6 8 10 12r

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

μ(r)

2 4 6 8 10 12r

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

Zs

Figure 12: Plots of the Compactness µ(r) and Surface redshift (Zs) of thestrange star candidate Her X-1 with respect to the radial coordinate r (km).

2 4 6 8 10r

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

ωr

2 4 6 8 10r

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

ωr

2 4 6 8 10r

0.10

0.15

0.20

ωr

Figure 13: Variations of the radial EoS parameter with respect to the radialcoordinate r(km) of the strange star candidate Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658,and 4U 1820-30; represented by (left to right) 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs,respectively.

Therefore, the redshift ZS is determined as

ZS + 1 = [−2µ(r) + 1]−1

2 . (35)

The graphical evolution of the surface redshift has been given in Figure (12).The value of the function ZS for the case of the strange star candidate HerX-1 is calculated as ZS ≈ 0.22 which is within the desired bound of ZS ≤ 2.

20

2 4 6 8 10r

�� !"

#$%&'

0.140

0.142

0.144

0.146

ωt

2 4 6 8 10r

0.088

0.090

0.092

0.094

ωt

2 4 6 8 10r

0.0675

0.0680

0.0685

()*+,-

ωt

Figure 14: Variations of the tangential EoS parameter with respect to theradial coordinate r (km) of the strange star candidate Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by (left to right) 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs,respectively.

4.8 EoS Parameter and the Measurement of Anisotropy

Now for anisotropic case, the radial and transversal forms of EoS parametercan be written as

ωr =prρ

and ωt =ptρ. (36)

The evolution of these EoS parameters with the increasing radius have beenshown in Figures (13 and 14) which clearly demonstrate that all the six plotssatisfy the inequalities 0 < ωr < 1 and 0 < ωt < 1. This further advocatesthe effectiveness of the considered model.

The measurement of the anisotropy denoted by ∆ is given by

∆ =2

r(pt − pr), (37)

which gives the information about the anisotropic behavior of the model. The∆ remains positive if pt > pr, suggesting the anisotropy being drawn outward,and for the reverted situation, i.e., pt < pr, the anisotropy ∆ turns negativewhich corresponds to being directed inward. For our situation, the variationsof the anisotropic measurement ∆ with respect to the radial coordinate rshow the decreasing negative behavior for the strange star candidate HerX-1 and SAX J 1808.4-3658 suggesting that pt < pr. For the 4U 1820-30 candidate, it remains positive for a fraction of the radius r where somerepulsive anisotropic force followed by massive matter distribution appearsand very soon, it gets negative after r = 0.25.

21

2 4 6 8 10r

-0.00006

-0.00005

-0.00004

-0.00003

-0.00002

-0.00001

Δ

2 4 6 8 10r

-0.00030

-0.00025

-0.00020

-0.00015

-0.00010

Δ

2 4 6 8 10r

-0.0003

-0.0002

-0.0001

Δ

Figure 15: Variations of anisotropic measure ∆ with respect to the radialcoordinate r (km) of the strange star candidate Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30; represented by (left to right) 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graphs,respectively.

5 Concluding Discussion

In this paper, we have put some useful discussions related to the emergenceof compact stars in the newly introduced f(G, T ) theory of gravity by con-sidering the model f(G, T ) = αGn + λT . We have tested this model for thestrange star candidates Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30 foranisotropic case by using the Krori and Barua approach of metric function[15], that is, a = Br2 + C, b = Ar2. The arbitrary constants A, B, and Care calculated by smoothly matching the interior metric conditions with theSchwarzschild’s exterior metric conditions. This phenomenon makes us tounderstand the nature of the compact stars by expressing their masses andradii in terms of the arbitrary constants.

By using these constants in our investigation for the strange star candi-dates Her X-1, SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30 the energy density, radialand tangential pressures have been plotted with respect to radial coordinater indicating that when r approaches to zero, the density goes to its maximumfor all the three strange star candidates. The same is the situation for thetangential pressure but different behavior in the case of the radial pressurefor the 4U 1820-30 candidate. Mainly, this situation admits the theory thatthe core of compact stars under consideration, is intensely compact, partic-ularly in case of the strange star candidate Her X-1. We have succeeded todetermine the density of the emerging compact star (≈ 1.5828×1015 g cm−3)after estimating the radius of the star (R ≈ 10) from the evolution of theradial pressure. The evolution of EoS parameters with the increasing radius

22

satisfies the inequalities 0 < ωr < 1 and 0 < ωt < 1 for the radial and tan-gential EoS parameters respectively, which favor the acceptance of the modelunder study. We have also shown through the graphical representation thatall the energy conditions namely NEC, WEC, SEC, and DEC are satisfiedfor the proposed f(G, T ) gravity model in the case of Her X-1 favoring thephysical viability of the model.

The static equilibrium, to some extent, has been established by plot-ting the three forces Fg, Fh, and Fa comprised in the TOV equation. Theevolution of the radial and transversal sound speeds denoted by v2sr and v2strespectively for strange star candidate Her X-1 are within the bounds of sta-bility [61] , but in the case of SAX J 1808.4-3658, and 4U 1820-30 strangestar candidates, the radial sound speed v2sr evolutions temporarily violatethese stability conditions. However, for the same candidates the transversalsound speeds v2st are satisfied. Within the matter distribution, the estimationof the strongly stable and unstable eras from the differences of the propaga-tions of the sound speeds satisfies the inequality 0 < |v2st − v2sr| < 1 for allthe candidates as shown in Figure 11. Thus, overall the stability is attainedfor compact star f(G, T ) model, particularly for the strange star candidateHer X-1.

We have also investigated the dynamical stability by analytically calcu-lating the adiabatic index γ of the model both for the radial and tangentialpressures for strange star candidate Her X-1, giving us γr = 1.3757 > 4/3and γt = 1.0597, which shows the complete stability in radial case but aslight deviation in the tangential case. We have found the direct proportion-ality of the mass function to the radius, and M(r) → 0 as r → 0, suggestingthat the mass function is regular at the center of the star. Moreover, forthe spherically symmetric anisotropic fluid case, the ratio of the mass to theradius has been calculated as 2M

r= 0.4987 satisfying 2M

r≤ 8

9as proposed by

Buchdahl [6]. The evolution of the compactness of the star for Her X-1 favorsthe model. The values of surface redshift function ZS are within the boundof ZS ≤ 2 and for the case of the strange star candidate Her X-1, the redshiftvalue is calculated as ZS ≈ 0.22 which satisfies the upper bound ZS ≤ 2.This further indicates the stability of the model under study. Conclusively,for the case of the strange star candidate Her X-1, all the physical parametershave been more consistent to favor the f(G, T ) gravity model under study ascompared to the other two candidates SAX J 1808.4-3658 and 4U 1820-30.The overall consistency for the model may be improved by considering somemore suitable choices of the physical parameters.

23

Acknowledgement

Many thanks to the anonymous reviewer for valuable comments and sugges-tions to improve the paper. This work was supported by National Universityof Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES).

References

[1] Sharif, M. and Ikram, A.: Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 640.

[2] Oppenheimer, J.R. and Volkoff, G.: Phys. Rev. 55(1939) 374.

[3] Negele, J.W. and Vautherin D.: Nucl. Phys. A 207 (1973) 298.

[4] Akmal, A., Pandharipande, V. R. and Ravenhall, D.G.: Phys. Rev. C58 (1998) 1804.

[5] Schwarzschild, K.: Sitzer. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 189 (1916) 424.

[6] Buchdahl, H. A.: Phys. Rev. 116 (1959) 1027.

[7] Baade, W. and Zwicky, F.: Phys. Rev. 46 (1934) 76.

[8] Longair, M.S.: High Energy Astrophysics (Cambridge Univeristy Press,1994).

[9] Ghosh, P.: Rotation and Accretion Powered Pulsars(World Scientific,2007).

[10] Ruderman, R.: Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10 (1972) 427.

[11] Maurya, S.K. and Gupta, Y.K.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 344 (2013) 243.

[12] Maurya, S.K. and Gupta, Y.K.: Phys. Scr. 86 (2012) 025009.

[13] Maharaj, S.D., Sunzu, J.M., and Ray, S.: Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129 (2014)3.

[14] Kalam, M. et al.: Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2248.

[15] Krori, K.D. and Barua, J.: J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 8 (1975) 508.

24

[16] Rahaman, F. et al.: Gen. Relativ. Grav. 44 (2012) 107.

[17] Rahaman, F. et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2071.

[18] Mak, M.K. and Harko, T.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13 (2004) 149.

[19] Hossein, S.K.M. et al.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 21 (2012) 1250088.

[20] Yazadjiev, S. S., Doneva, D. D. and Kokkotas, K. D.: Phys. Rev. D 91(2015) 084018.

[21] Staykov, K. V., Doneva, D. D., Yazadjiev, S. S. and Kokkotas, K. D.:JCAP 10 (2014) 006

[22] Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Rep. 505 (2011) 59.

[23] Paliathanasis, A et al.: Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 104042.

[24] Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S.D.: Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 4 (2007)115.

[25] Capozziello, S., Laurentis, M. D. and Odintsov, S.D.: Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2068.

[26] Capozziello, S., Laurentis, M. D. Odintsov, S.D. and Stabile, A.: Phys.Rev. D 83 (2011) 064004.

[27] Astashenok, A. V., Capozziello, S., Laurentis, M. D. and Odintsov, S.D.:JCAP 1501 (2015) 001.

[28] Capozziello, S., Laurentis, M. D., Farinelli, R., and Odintsov, S.D.:Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 023501.

[29] Felice, A.D. and Tsujikaswa, S.: Living Rev. Rel. 13 (2010 ) 3.

[30] Bamba, K., Capozziella, S., Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S.D.: Astrophys.Space Sci. 342 (2012) 155.

[31] Astashenok, A.V., Capozziello, S. and Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Rev. D 89(2014) 103509.

[32] Astashenok, A.V., Capozziello, S. and Odintsov, S.D.: JCAP 01 (2015)001.

25

[33] Cognola, G., Elizalde, E., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D. and Zerbini, S.:Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 084007.

[34] Shamir, M.F.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 361 (2016) 147.

[35] Shamir, M.F.: J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 123 (2016) 607.

[36] Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 1.

[37] Chiba, T.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2005) 008.

[38] Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S.D. and Tretyakov, P.V.: Prog. Theor. Phys.Suppl. 172 (2008) 81.

[39] Starobinsky, A. A.: J. Exp. Theor. Phy. 86 (2009) 157.

[40] Harko, T., Lobo, F.S.N., Nojiri, S. and Odinttsov, S.D.: Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 024020.

[41] Sharif, M. and Zubair, M.: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82 (2013) 014002.

[42] Sharif, M. and Zubair, M.: JCAP 03 (2012) 028.

[43] Das, et al.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 358 (2015) 36.

[44] Das, et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 654.

[45] Sharif, M. and Yousuf, Z.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 354 (2014) 471.

[46] Noureen, I. et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 323.

[47] Zubair, M. and Noureen, I.: Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 265.

[48] Zubair, M., Abbas, G. and Noureen, I.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 361(2016) 8.

[49] Shamir, M.F. and Ahmad, M.: Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 55.

[50] Shamir, M.F. and Ahmad, M.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32 (2017) 1750086.

[51] Cognola, G., Elizalde, E., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D. and Zerbini, S.:Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 086002.

[52] Cooney, A., DeDeo, S., and Psaltis, D.: Phys. Rev. D 82(2010) 064033.

26

[53] Ganguly, A., Gannouji, R., Goswami, R., and Ray, S.: Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 064019.

[54] Momeni, D. and Myrzakulov, R.: Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.12(2015) 1550014.

[55] Astashenok, A. V., Capozziello, S., Laurentis, M. D. and Odintsov, S.D.:JCAP 1312 (2013) 040.

[56] Lattimer, J.M. and Steiner, A.W.: Astrophy. J. 784 (2014) 123.

[57] Li, X.D. et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3776.

[58] Glendenning, N.K. Compact Stars: Nuclear Physics, Particle Physics

and General Relativity (Springer, NewYork, 1997).

[59] Herjog, M. and Roepke, F.K.: Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 083002.

[60] Bhar, P., Rahaman, S., Ray, S. and Chatterjee, V.: Eur. Phys. J. C 75(2015) 190.

[61] Herrera, L.: Phys. Lett. A 165 (1992)) 206.

[62] Chandrasekhar, S.: Astrophys. J. 140 (1964) 417.

[63] Heintzmann, H. and Hillebrandt, W.: Astron. Astrophys. 38 (1975) 51.

[64] Bondi, H.: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Series A Math. Phys. Sci. 281 (1964)39.

27