EIA Report for Addition in the Existing Plant by M/s. Deepak ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of EIA Report for Addition in the Existing Plant by M/s. Deepak ...
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED
EIA Report for Addition in the Existing Plant by M/s. Deepak Phenolics Limited on Plot No. 12/B/1, GIDC Dahej, Taluka Vagra, District Bharuch
JUNE 2017
Kadam Environmental Consultants w w w . ka d a m en v i r o . c o m
E n v i r o n m e n t f o r D e v e l o p m e n t
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC QUALITY CONTROL
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 2
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED
EIA Report for Addition in the Existing Plant by M/s. Deepak Phenolics Limited on Plot No. 12/B/1, GIDC Dahej, Taluka Vagra, District Bharuch © Kadam Environmental Consultants (‘Kadam’), June, 2017
This report is released for the use of the M/s. Deepak Phenolics Limited, Regulators and relevant
stakeholders solely as part of the subject project’s Environmental Clearance process. Information provided,
unless attributed to referenced third parties, is copyrighted and shall not be used for any other purpose
without the written consent of Kadam.
QUALITY CONTROL
Name of
Publication
EIA Report for Addition in the Existing Plant by M/s. Deepak Phenolics Limited on Plot
No. 12/B/1, GIDC Dahej, Taluka Vagra, District Bharuch
Project Number 1523088110 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 0 Released June, 2017
DISCLAIMER
Kadam has taken all reasonable precautions in the preparation of this report as per its auditable quality plan. Kadam
also believes that the facts presented in the report are accurate as on the date it was written. However, it is
impossible to dismiss absolutely, the possibility of errors or omissions. Kadam therefore specifically disclaims any
liability resulting from the use or application of the information contained in this report. The information is not
intended to serve as legal advice related to the individual situation.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND ............................................................................................. 29
1.1 Purpose of the Report ........................................................................................................................ 29
1.2 Identification of the Project Proponent and the Project ......................................................................... 29
1.2.1 About Deepak Phenolics Limited. .................................................................................................. 29
1.2.2 The Project ................................................................................................................................. 29
1.3 Brief Description of Nature, Size, Location of the Project and its Importance to Country, Region ............. 30
1.3.1 Nature of the Project ................................................................................................................... 30
1.3.2 Size of the Project ....................................................................................................................... 30
1.3.3 Location...................................................................................................................................... 30
1.4 Importance of the Project to the Country/Region ................................................................................. 31
1.4.1 Investment ................................................................................................................................. 36
1.4.2 Direct Jobs .................................................................................................................................. 36
1.4.3 Indirect Jobs ............................................................................................................................... 36
1.5 Status of EC Process .......................................................................................................................... 36
1.6 Scope of the Study ............................................................................................................................ 36
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 46
2.1 Type of Project ................................................................................................................................. 46
2.2 Need for the project .......................................................................................................................... 46
2.3 Location (maps showing general location, specific location, project boundary & project site layout) ......... 46
2.4 Approach and Connectivity to Facility .................................................................................................. 52
2.5 Size or Magnitude of the Project ......................................................................................................... 53
2.5.1 Magnitude of the Project .............................................................................................................. 53
2.5.2 Cost of the Project ....................................................................................................................... 53
2.6 Best Available Technologies (BAT) ...................................................................................................... 53
2.7 Manufacturing Processes with Flow Diagram and Mass Balance ............................................................ 54
2.7.1 Phenol & Acetone ........................................................................................................................ 54
2.7.2 Cumene ...................................................................................................................................... 55
2.7.3 MIBK .......................................................................................................................................... 57
2.7.4 Cyclohexanone ............................................................................................................................ 58
2.7.5 Isopropyl Alcohol ......................................................................................................................... 60
2.7.6 Acetophenone ............................................................................................................................. 61
2.8 End use of Products........................................................................................................................... 62
2.9 Cleaner Production Technology .......................................................................................................... 62
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 7
2.10 Properties of Raw Materials .......................................................................................................... 64
2.11 Storage Details of Raw Materials & Products .................................................................................. 65
2.12 Transportation Details .................................................................................................................. 66
2.13 Infrastructure Facility ................................................................................................................... 67
2.13.1 Power ..................................................................................................................................... 67
2.13.2 Water Supply .......................................................................................................................... 67
2.13.3 Effluent Disposal Facility ........................................................................................................... 67
2.13.4 Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility ............................................................................................ 67
2.14 Water Consumption and Wastewater Generation for Proposed Expansion ........................................ 67
2.14.1 Wastewater Disposal ................................................................................................................ 71
2.14.2 Wastewater Treatment Scheme ................................................................................................ 71
2.14.3 Ultra-Filtration System ............................................................................................................. 74
2.14.4 Reverse Osmosis System .......................................................................................................... 74
2.14.5 Adequacy of proposed ETP ....................................................................................................... 77
2.14.6 Water Conservation Measures .................................................................................................. 78
2.14.7 Management Plan for effluent generated from spillage, leakages, vessel washing etc. .................. 78
2.15 Fuel Consumption ........................................................................................................................ 79
2.16 Stack Details ............................................................................................................................... 79
2.16.1 Air Pollution Control Measures .................................................................................................. 80
2.17 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management ...................................................................................... 83
2.17.1 Quantification, Classification, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid / Hazardous Waste .. 83
2.17.2 Measures to be taken to Minimize Manual Handling .................................................................... 85
2.17.3 Methodology of de-contamination and disposal of discarded containers ....................................... 86
2.17.4 Other Solids Wastes ................................................................................................................. 86
2.18 Project scheduling ....................................................................................................................... 86
3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................... 87
3.1 General ............................................................................................................................................ 87
3.2 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 87
3.3 Study Area ........................................................................................................................................ 87
3.4 Land use / Land cover ....................................................................................................................... 87
3.4.1 Classification of Land use and Land cover ...................................................................................... 87
3.4.2 Study Area .................................................................................................................................. 88
3.4.3 Methodology of Land use Pattern Studies ...................................................................................... 88
3.4.4 Ground Survey ............................................................................................................................ 89
3.4.5 Land use and Land cover Pattern Studies ...................................................................................... 89
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 8
3.4.6 Class Wise Area Statistics ............................................................................................................. 92
3.5 Proximity to Sea / Water Body ............................................................................................................ 93
3.5.1 Important Features within the Study Area ..................................................................................... 94
3.6 Meteorology and Air Quality Modelling ................................................................................................ 94
3.6.1 Climate of the Study Area ............................................................................................................ 94
3.6.2 Site specific Meteorology .............................................................................................................. 95
3.7 Ambient Air Quality ........................................................................................................................... 97
3.7.1 Season and Period of Monitoring .................................................................................................. 97
3.7.2 Selected Sampling Stations .......................................................................................................... 97
3.7.3 Sampling Frequency .................................................................................................................... 98
3.7.4 Results of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring .................................................................................... 101
3.8 Noise Environment .......................................................................................................................... 103
3.8.1 Monitoring Methodology of Noise Level ....................................................................................... 103
3.8.2 Noise Level Results .................................................................................................................... 103
3.9 Water Environment ......................................................................................................................... 105
3.9.1 Analysis Method Adopted ........................................................................................................... 105
3.9.2 Primary Data Collection .............................................................................................................. 106
3.9.3 Details of Surface Water Sampling Locations ............................................................................... 106
3.9.4 Quality of Surface water ............................................................................................................ 106
3.9.5 Observation of Surface water (Pond & River) quality .................................................................... 110
3.9.6 Groundwater Monitoring Methodology ......................................................................................... 110
3.9.7 Groundwater Sampling Location ................................................................................................. 111
3.9.8 Quality of Water (Physical, Chemical and Bacteriological) ............................................................. 112
3.9.9 Observations ............................................................................................................................. 114
3.10 Hydrology & Geology ................................................................................................................. 114
3.10.1 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 114
3.10.2 Topography and Geomorphology ............................................................................................ 114
3.10.3 Regional Geology ................................................................................................................... 114
3.10.4 Geological and Hydrogeological conditions ............................................................................... 115
3.10.5 Seismicity.............................................................................................................................. 115
3.11 Soil ........................................................................................................................................... 116
3.11.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 116
3.11.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 116
3.11.3 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 116
3.11.4 Soil sample collection Methodology ......................................................................................... 116
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 9
3.11.5 Methodology of Soil Sample Analysis ....................................................................................... 117
3.11.6 Analysis Results of Soil ........................................................................................................... 117
3.11.7 Soil Quality............................................................................................................................ 118
3.11.8 Interpretation ........................................................................................................................ 118
3.12 Ecology and Biodiversity ............................................................................................................ 118
3.12.1 Scope, Aim and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 118
3.12.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................ 119
3.12.3 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 119
3.12.4 Terrestrial Ecosystem ............................................................................................................. 120
3.12.5 Agriculture and Horticulture .................................................................................................... 126
3.12.6 Aquatic Ecosystem ................................................................................................................. 126
3.13 Socio-Economics ....................................................................................................................... 126
3.13.1 Demographic Profile............................................................................................................... 127
3.13.2 Social Profile ......................................................................................................................... 127
3.13.3 Basic Infrastructure Facility .................................................................................................... 128
3.13.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................................... 130
3.13.5 Historical and Cultural Profile .................................................................................................. 131
4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES....................................... 132
4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 132
4.2 Details of Investigated Environmental Impacts .................................................................................. 132
4.2.1 Methodology of Impact Assessment ............................................................................................ 132
4.2.2 Identification of Impacting Activities for the Proposed Project ....................................................... 142
4.3 Land Environment ........................................................................................................................... 144
4.3.1 Identification of Impacting Activities for the Proposed Expansion .................................................. 144
4.3.2 Indirect Impact ......................................................................................................................... 144
4.3.3 Mitigation Measure .................................................................................................................... 145
4.4 Air Environment .............................................................................................................................. 145
4.4.1 Operational Phase ..................................................................................................................... 145
4.4.2 Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................................... 151
4.4.3 Fugitive Emissions ..................................................................................................................... 151
4.4.4 Odour Control ........................................................................................................................... 152
4.4.5 Leak Detection and Repair Programme (LDAR) ............................................................................ 152
4.5 Traffic Survey ................................................................................................................................. 153
4.6 Noise Environment .......................................................................................................................... 153
4.6.1 Assessment of Noise using SoundPlan ......................................................................................... 156
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 10
4.6.2 Consideration during the analysis ............................................................................................... 156
4.6.3 Observations ............................................................................................................................. 159
4.6.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 159
4.6.5 Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................................... 160
4.7 Surface Water and Hazardous Waste ................................................................................................ 160
4.7.1 Impacts Scoring on Surface Water & Hazardous Waste Management ............................................ 160
4.7.2 Mitigation Measures for Impacts on Surface Water Sources and Quality ......................................... 161
4.8 Ground Water and Geology .............................................................................................................. 161
4.8.1 Impact...................................................................................................................................... 162
4.8.2 Mitigation ................................................................................................................................. 162
4.9 Ecology & Bio-diversity .................................................................................................................... 163
4.9.1 Likely Impacts on Flora fauna ..................................................................................................... 163
4.10 Soil Environment ....................................................................................................................... 164
4.10.1 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................... 164
4.11 Socio-economic Environment ...................................................................................................... 164
4.12 Occupational Health and Risk to Surrounding Communities ........................................................... 167
4.12.1 Hazard Identification and Proposed Safety Measures ................................................................ 167
5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (Technology & Site) ...................................................................... 169
6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................................................ 170
6.1 Environmental Monitoring Programme .............................................................................................. 170
6.2 Regulatory Framework ..................................................................................................................... 171
7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES ................................................................................................................. 172
7.1 Public Consultation .......................................................................................................................... 172
7.2 Risk Assessment (Hazard Identification and Consequence Analysis) .................................................... 172
7.2.1 Background............................................................................................................................... 172
7.2.2 Key Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 172
7.2.3 Methodology for Risk Assessment ............................................................................................... 173
7.2.4 Hazard Identification ................................................................................................................. 173
7.2.5 Selection of Maximum Credible Loss Scenarios (MCLs’) ................................................................. 175
7.2.6 Simulation of Release and Development of Contours .................................................................... 177
7.2.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 190
7.2.8 Risk Assessment for Pipeline ...................................................................................................... 191
7.3 Disaster Management Plan ............................................................................................................... 192
7.3.1 Objective .................................................................................................................................. 192
7.3.2 Mode of Emergencies ................................................................................................................ 192
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 11
7.3.3 Fire & Explosion ........................................................................................................................ 193
7.3.4 Major Accident & Dangerous Occurrences ................................................................................... 193
7.3.5 Stages of an Emergency Plan ..................................................................................................... 194
7.3.6 Emergency Alert Codes .............................................................................................................. 196
7.3.7 Roles and Responsibilities during Emergency ............................................................................... 197
7.3.8 Standard Procedures for Evacuation ............................................................................................ 204
7.3.9 Emergency Control Centre ......................................................................................................... 205
7.3.10 About medical arrangements .................................................................................................. 207
7.3.11 Accounting for Personnel / Head count .................................................................................... 207
7.3.12 About Fire System ................................................................................................................. 208
7.3.13 Action at Site in case of Emergency ........................................................................................ 210
7.3.14 Antidotes .............................................................................................................................. 211
7.3.15 Emergency Do’s and Don’ts .................................................................................................... 212
7.4 Occupational Health Surveillance ...................................................................................................... 214
7.4.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................... 214
7.4.2 Scope ....................................................................................................................................... 214
7.4.3 Responsibility ............................................................................................................................ 214
7.4.4 Procedure ................................................................................................................................. 214
7.4.5 Cross Reference ........................................................................................................................ 215
7.5 Social Impact Assessment. R&R Action Plans ..................................................................................... 216
8 PROJECT BENEFITS ...................................................................................................................... 217
9 ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 218
10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP).......................................................................... 219
10.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................... 219
10.2 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................. 219
10.3 Noise Environment .................................................................................................................... 220
10.4 Surface Water & Solid Waste Management .................................................................................. 221
10.5 Land and Soil Environment ......................................................................................................... 224
10.6 Ecological Management.............................................................................................................. 224
10.6.1 Green Belt Development ........................................................................................................ 224
10.6.2 Greenbelt Designing .............................................................................................................. 224
10.6.3 Locations of the Proposed Greenbelt ....................................................................................... 224
10.6.4 Plantation Technique and Care ............................................................................................... 226
10.7 Rainwater Harvesting ................................................................................................................. 226
10.8 Occupational Health Management Plan ....................................................................................... 227
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 12
10.8.1 Noise .................................................................................................................................... 227
10.8.2 Heat ..................................................................................................................................... 227
10.8.3 Dust, other Chemicals being suspended in the Environment ...................................................... 227
10.8.4 Occupational Hazards Specific Pre-placement and Periodic Monitoring ....................................... 227
10.9 Socio-Economic Environment ...................................................................................................... 228
10.9.1 Budgetary Provision ............................................................................................................... 229
10.10 Expenditure on Environmental Matter ......................................................................................... 230
10.11 Environmental Management Cell ................................................................................................. 230
11 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 232
11.1 Introduction and Background ..................................................................................................... 232
11.2 The Project ............................................................................................................................... 232
11.3 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................................... 232
11.4 Project details ........................................................................................................................... 232
11.4.1 Cost of the Project ................................................................................................................. 232
11.4.2 Area Statement ..................................................................................................................... 232
11.4.3 Power Requirement ............................................................................................................... 233
11.4.4 Water Resources and Water Quality ........................................................................................ 233
11.4.5 Air Emission .......................................................................................................................... 233
11.4.6 Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility .......................................................................................... 233
11.5 Description of Environment ........................................................................................................ 233
11.5.1 Study Period ......................................................................................................................... 233
11.5.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................ 233
11.5.3 Landuse of the Study Area ..................................................................................................... 234
11.5.4 Climatology ........................................................................................................................... 234
11.5.5 Noise .................................................................................................................................... 236
11.5.6 Ground Water Quality ............................................................................................................ 236
11.5.7 Surface Water Quality ............................................................................................................ 236
11.5.8 Soil ....................................................................................................................................... 237
11.5.9 Biological Environment ........................................................................................................... 237
11.5.10 Socio- Economics ................................................................................................................... 237
11.6 Environment Impact Identification, Prediction and Mitigation ........................................................ 237
11.6.1 Air Environment ..................................................................................................................... 237
11.6.2 Noise Environment................................................................................................................. 239
11.6.3 Surface Water ....................................................................................................................... 240
11.6.4 Ground Water and Geology .................................................................................................... 240
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 13
11.6.5 Land Environment ................................................................................................................. 240
11.6.6 Biological Environment ........................................................................................................... 241
11.6.7 Socio-Economic Environment .................................................................................................. 241
11.6.8 Hazard Identification and Consequence Analysis ...................................................................... 241
11.7 Project Benefits ......................................................................................................................... 241
11.8 Environmental Management and Monitoring Plant ........................................................................ 242
11.8.1 Environmental Management Plan ............................................................................................ 242
11.8.2 Environmental Monitoring Plan ............................................................................................... 242
11.9 Summary and Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 243
12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ............................................................................................... 244
12.1 Brief Resume and Nature of Consultancy Rendered by Kadam Environmental Consultants .............. 244
12.2 EIA Team Members ................................................................................................................... 245
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 14
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure 1: Terms of Reference Issued by SEIAA, Gujarat .............................................................................. 247
Annexure 2: Copy of Existing Environmental Clearance ................................................................................... 257
Annexure 3: Existing Consent to Established Issued by GPCB........................................................................... 268
Annexure 4: Licensor’s Note on Proposed Capacity Utilization .......................................................................... 276
Annexure 5: Land Possession Documents from GIDC ...................................................................................... 277
Annexure 6: Undertaking Provided by Deepak Phenolics Limited ...................................................................... 280
Annexure 7: Toposheet of the Project site with Demarcation of Nearest Habitation in 1: 50000 Scale ................. 281
Annexure 8: Toposheet of the Project site in 1: 50000 Scale ............................................................................ 282
Annexure 9: Map Showing Separate Entry, Exist and Tanker Movement at Site ................................................. 283
Annexure 10: Certificate of PESO, Nagpur ...................................................................................................... 284
Annexure 11: Land use/cover classification ..................................................................................................... 289
Annexure 12: Photo Documentation ............................................................................................................... 293
Annexure 13: Ambient Air Monitoring Results ................................................................................................. 296
Annexure 14: Long-term climatological Table, Surat (Gujarat) ......................................................................... 302
Annexure 15: Dispersion Modeling Results ...................................................................................................... 304
Annexure 16: Compliance of Consent to Establish ........................................................................................... 329
Annexure 17: Layout of Fire Water Network ................................................................................................... 338
Annexure 18: Map showing Gas Detectors Location ........................................................................................ 338
Annexure 19: Undertaking of Project Proponent on the Ownership of the Report .............................................. 340
Annexure 20: Existing EC Compliance ............................................................................................................ 341
Annexure 21: Certificate of Accreditation Issued by the NABET, QCI ................................................................ 405
Annexure 22: Application of Certified Compliance Report to MOEFCC, Bhopal ................................................... 406
Annexure 23: Agreement with Cement Manufacturing Unit .............................................................................. 407
Annexure 24: Equipment List of Various Process ............................................................................................. 408
Annexure 25: Environmental Policy of DPL ..................................................................................................... 413
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 15
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Production Capacity ........................................................................................................................ 29
Table 1-2: Project Status till Date .................................................................................................................... 36
Table 1-3: Compliance with the Proposed Terms of References .......................................................................... 37
Table 2-1: Product and importance. ................................................................................................................. 46
Table 2-2: Latitude and Longitude of Project Site .............................................................................................. 49
Table 2-3: Area Break up at Site ...................................................................................................................... 51
Table 2-4: Material Balance for Phenol and Acetone .......................................................................................... 55
Table 2-5: Material Balance for Cumene ........................................................................................................... 56
Table 2-6: Material Balance for MIBK ............................................................................................................... 58
Table 2-7: Material Balance for Cyclohexanone ................................................................................................. 59
Table 2-8: Material Balance for Isopropyl Alcohol .............................................................................................. 60
Table 2-9: Material Balance for Acetophenone .................................................................................................. 62
Table 2-10: End use of the Products ................................................................................................................ 62
Table 2-11: Properties of Raw Material ............................................................................................................. 64
Table 2-12: Details of Storage of Raw Materials ................................................................................................ 65
Table 2-13: Details of Storage of Products ........................................................................................................ 65
Table 2-14: Transportation Details of Raw Materials .......................................................................................... 66
Table 2-15: Details of Water Consumption........................................................................................................ 68
Table 2-16: Details of Wastewater Generation .................................................................................................. 68
Table 2-17: Stream Wise Quality of Wastewater Generated from Entire Plant ...................................................... 71
Table 2-18: Design Inlet & Outlet Characteristics of Proposed ETP ..................................................................... 72
Table 2-19: List of ETP Units with Sizing .......................................................................................................... 72
Table 2-20: Adequacy of ETP .......................................................................................................................... 77
Table 2-21: Details of Water Saving ................................................................................................................. 78
Table 2-22: Details of Fuel Consumption .......................................................................................................... 79
Table 2-23: Details of Flue Gas Stack ............................................................................................................... 79
Table 2-24: Details of Process Vents ................................................................................................................ 80
Table 2-25: Details of Air Pollution Control Measures ......................................................................................... 80
Table 2-26: Hazardous Waste Generation and disposal Details ........................................................................... 84
Table 3-1: Synopsis of Landuse / Landcover Classification Used for the Project ................................................... 87
Table 3-2: GPS readings within study area ....................................................................................................... 89
Table 3-3: Classification system ....................................................................................................................... 89
Table 3-4: Area Statistics for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area .............................................. 92
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 16
Table 3-5: Proximity to Sea / Water Bodies ...................................................................................................... 93
Table 3-6: Important Features and Sensitive Ecological Locations in the Study Area ............................................ 94
Table 3-7: Predominant Wind Direction ............................................................................................................ 95
Table 3-8: Monitoring Methodology of Meteorological Data ................................................................................ 96
Table 3-9: Average Mean Meteorological Data for Summer Season 2017 ............................................................ 96
Table 3-10: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Details............................................................................................ 98
Table 3-11: Methodology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring .............................................................................. 99
Table 3-12: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results ......................................................................................... 101
Table 3-13: Monitoring methodology .............................................................................................................. 103
Table 3-14: Ambient Air Quality Standards in respect of Noise for Different Areas/Zones ................................... 103
Table 3-15: Noise Level distance, direction, lat./ long & Readings .................................................................... 104
Table 3-16: Analysis Methods Adopted for Surface Water Samples ................................................................... 105
Table 3-17: Details of Surface Water Sampling Locations ................................................................................. 106
Table 3-18: Analysis Result of Pond Water Samples ........................................................................................ 107
Table 3-19: Analysis Result of Estuary Water Samples ..................................................................................... 108
Table 3-20: Monitoring Methodology of Groundwater ...................................................................................... 110
Table 3-21: Groundwater Sampling Locations ................................................................................................. 111
Table 3-22: Groundwater analysis results ....................................................................................................... 112
Table 3-23: Soil Sampling Locations ............................................................................................................... 117
Table 3-24: Methodology of Soil Sample Monitoring ........................................................................................ 117
Table 3-25: Soil Analysis Results .................................................................................................................... 117
Table 3-26: Floral species reported from the proposed project site / Core Zone................................................. 120
Table 3-27: Flora Reported from Buffer Zone of the Study Area ....................................................................... 120
Table 3-28: Herpetofauna Reported from Buffer Zone ..................................................................................... 124
Table 3-29: Avifauna Reported from Core Zone / Project Site .......................................................................... 124
Table 3-30: Birds Reported from Buffer Zone .................................................................................................. 124
Table 3-31: Mammals Reported from the Buffer Zone ..................................................................................... 126
Table 3-32: Villages in Study Area with Households and Population .................................................................. 127
Table 3-33: Population and Sex ratio details in 2011 ....................................................................................... 127
Table 3-34: Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Population in 2011 .................................................................. 128
Table 3-35: Literacy Rate in Study Area in 2011 .............................................................................................. 128
Table 3-36 : Education Facility ....................................................................................................................... 129
Table 3-37: Medical Facility ........................................................................................................................... 129
Table 3-38: Medical Facility ........................................................................................................................... 129
Table 3-39: Communication Facility ............................................................................................................... 130
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 17
Table 3-40: Transport Facility ........................................................................................................................ 130
Table 3-41: Occupation Patterns .................................................................................................................... 131
Table 4-1: Overall Impact Scoring System due to Proposed Project – Consequence Assessment ......................... 134
Table 4-2: Magnitude Assessment (Ecology & Biodiversity) .............................................................................. 137
Table 4-3: Occurrence Frequency Assessment for EB ...................................................................................... 139
Table 4-4: Probability of Occurrence for Others .............................................................................................. 139
Table 4-5: Environmental Impact Significance Criteria ..................................................................................... 139
Table 4-6: Ecological Impact Significance Criteria ............................................................................................ 140
Table 4-7: Environmental Risk Categorization ................................................................................................. 140
Table 4-8: Ecological Risk Categorization ........................................................................................................ 141
Table 4-9: Environmental Impacts ................................................................................................................. 142
Table 4-10: Aspect – Impact Identification ..................................................................................................... 144
Table 4-11: Impact Scoring - Land use/cover ................................................................................................. 144
Table 4-12: Flue Gas Stack details and emission rate of pollutants after proposed expansion ............................. 147
Table 4-13: Process Vents details and Pollutant’s Emission Rate ....................................................................... 147
Table 4-14: 24 hr average Incremental Increase in GLC .................................................................................. 149
Table 4-15: Impact Scoring of Air Environment ............................................................................................... 151
Table 4-16: Details of Traffic Survey of 24 Hours ............................................................................................ 153
Table 4-17: Environmental Impact Scoring ..................................................................................................... 155
Table 4-18: Sources of noise with their sound pressure levels .......................................................................... 156
Table 4-19: Noise level at receptor locations ................................................................................................... 159
Table 4-20 Impact Scoring for Surface Water Management .............................................................................. 160
Table 4-21: Impact scoring Ground water ...................................................................................................... 162
Table 4-22: Activity-Aspect Based Determination of Impacting Ecological Components ...................................... 163
Table 4-23: Impact Assessment and Mitigation Measures ................................................................................ 163
Table 4-24: Impact scoring for Soil ................................................................................................................ 164
Table 4-25: Socio-economic Impact Assessment ............................................................................................. 164
Table 4-26: Issues Raised During Community Consultation .............................................................................. 165
Table 4-27: Impact Scoring of Occupational Health, Community Health and Safety ........................................... 168
Table 6-1: Environment Monitoring Program ................................................................................................... 170
Table 6-2: Environmental Monitoring Plan-Soil Pollution .................................................................................. 170
Table 6-3: Applicable EHS Regulatory Requirements ....................................................................................... 171
Table 7-1: Important Hazardous Events ......................................................................................................... 173
Table 7-2 : Damage due to Radiation Intensity ............................................................................................... 174
Table 7-3: Overpressure Damage .................................................................................................................. 175
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 18
Table 7-4: Storage Details of Hazardous Material ............................................................................................ 176
Table 7-5: Scenario Selected for Simulation .................................................................................................... 176
Table 7-6: Failure Frequency for Storage Tanks .............................................................................................. 177
Table 7-7: Broadly Accepted Frequency .......................................................................................................... 177
Table 7-8: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Acetone ........................................................ 177
Table 7-9: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Acetone ................................................................. 178
Table 7-10: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Benzene ...................................................... 180
Table 7-11: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Benzene ............................................................... 180
Table 7-12: Distance to Equivalent Toxic Dose due to Release of Benzene ........................................................ 181
Table 7-13: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Phenol ........................................................ 183
Table 7-14: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Phenol .................................................................. 183
Table 7-15: Distance to Equivalent Toxic Dose due to Release of Phenol .......................................................... 183
Table 7-16: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Propylene .................................................... 186
Table 7-17: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Propylene ............................................................. 186
Table 7-18: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Cumene ...................................................... 188
Table 7-19: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Cumene ............................................................... 189
Table 7-20: Maximum Distance of 20 mm Leak ............................................................................................... 190
Table 7-21: Maximum Distance of Catastrophic Rupture .................................................................................. 191
Table 7-22: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Hydrogen .................................................... 191
Table 7-23: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Hydrogen ............................................................. 191
Table 7-24: Details of Alarms & Siren ............................................................................................................. 203
Table 7-25: Fire Water Storage & Pumping Capacity ....................................................................................... 208
Table 7-26: Fire Alarm Systems ..................................................................................................................... 209
Table 7-27: GAS Detection System................................................................................................................. 209
Table 7-28: Fire Extinguisher ......................................................................................................................... 209
Table 7-29: Auxiliary Equipment in Fire Station ............................................................................................... 209
Table 7-30: Details of Antidotes ..................................................................................................................... 211
Table 10-1: Environmental Management Plan for Air Quality ............................................................................ 220
Table 10-2: Environmental Management Plan for Noise Environment ............................................................... 221
Table 10-3 Details of Activities responsible for Impact on Water Environment and Management Plan .................. 222
Table 10-4: Environmental Management Plan -Soil Environment ...................................................................... 224
Table 10-5: Plant Species Suggested for Greenbelt and Landscaping at Various Locations .................................. 225
Table 10-6: Budget for Proposed Greenbelt Development within Project Site .................................................... 225
Table 10-7: Land Area Breakup and Estimation of Runoff ................................................................................ 226
Table 10-8: Enterprise Social Commitment (Initial 5 Years) .............................................................................. 229
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 19
Table 10-9: Expenditure on Environmental Matters ......................................................................................... 230
Table 10-10: Environment Management Cell ................................................................................................... 230
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 20
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Site Location Map .......................................................................................................................... 48
Figure 2-2: Map Showing Project Boundary ...................................................................................................... 48
Figure 2-3: Site Layout Map ............................................................................................................................ 50
Figure 2-4: Pie Chart of Area Break up at Site ................................................................................................... 52
Figure 2-5: Water Balance Diagram – After Proposed Expansion ........................................................................ 69
Figure 2-6: GIDC Permission for Water Supply, Power Supply and Drainage ........................................................ 70
Figure 2-7: Process Block diagram of ETP ......................................................................................................... 76
Figure 2-8: Diagram of Incineration ................................................................................................................. 81
Figure 2-9: Diagram of ESP ............................................................................................................................. 82
Figure 2-10: Diagram of Bag Filter ................................................................................................................... 83
Figure 2-11: Membership of Saurashtra Enviro Projects Pvt. Ltd., Samkhyali ....................................................... 85
Figure 2-12: Project Scheduling for the Project ................................................................................................. 86
Figure 3-1: Landuse Map of the Study Area ...................................................................................................... 91
Figure 3-2: Pie Chart of Area Statistics for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area ........................... 93
Figure 3-3: Windrose Diagram for Summer season 2017 ................................................................................... 97
Figure 3-4: Sampling Location Map ................................................................................................................ 100
Figure 3-5: Earthquake zoning map of Gujarat ................................................................................................ 116
Figure 4-1: Isopleths for Incremental Noise Generated during Daytime ............................................................ 157
Figure 4-2: Isopleths for Incremental Noise Generated during Night Time......................................................... 157
Figure 7-1: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Acetone due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E ............................................................................................................................................... 179
Figure 7-2: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Acetone due to 20mm leak leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E ............................................................................................................................................... 179
Figure 7-3: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Acetone due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E ............................................................................................................................................... 179
Figure 7-4: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Acetone due to Catastrophic Rupture at Weather Condition 2/E
................................................................................................................................................................... 180
Figure 7-5: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Benzene due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 5/D ............................................................................................................................................... 181
Figure 7-6: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Benzene due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E ............................................................................................................................................... 182
Figure 7-7: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Benzene due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 5/D ............................................................................................................................................... 182
Figure 7-8: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Benzene due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E ............................................................................................................................................... 182
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 21
Figure 7-9: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Phenol due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather Condition
5/D ............................................................................................................................................................. 184
Figure 7-10: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Phenol due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 5/D ............................................................................................................................................... 184
Figure 7-11: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Phenol due to Catastrophic Rupture of Storage Tank at
Weather Condition 5/D ................................................................................................................................. 184
Figure 7-12: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Phenol due to Catastrophic Rupture at Weather Condition 3/B
................................................................................................................................................................... 185
Figure 7-13: Risk contour for Maximum concentration of Phenol in the environment due to 10mm leak in Phenol
Storage tank at weather condition 2/E ........................................................................................................... 185
Figure 7-14: Risk contour for Maximum concentration of Phenol in the environment due to 20mm leak in Phenol
Storage tank at weather condition 2/E ........................................................................................................... 185
Figure 7-15: Risk contour for Maximum concentration of Phenol in the environment due to Catastrophic Rupture of
Phenol Storage tank at weather condition 2/E................................................................................................. 186
Figure 7-16: Jet Fire Consequence Contour of Propylene due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather Condition
2/E .............................................................................................................................................................. 187
Figure 7-17: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Propylene due to 10 mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E ............................................................................................................................................... 187
Figure 7-18: Jet Fire Consequence Contour of Propylene due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather Condition
2/E .............................................................................................................................................................. 187
Figure 7-19: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Propylene due to 20 mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E ............................................................................................................................................... 188
Figure 7-20: Late Pool Consequence Contour of Cumene due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather Condition
5/D ............................................................................................................................................................. 189
Figure 7-21: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Cumene due to 20 mm leak in Storage Tank at
Weather Condition 3/B ............................................................................................................................ 190
Figure 7-22: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Cumene due to Catastrophic Rupture at Weather Condition
3/B .............................................................................................................................................................. 190
Figure 7-23: Types of Emergencies ................................................................................................................ 193
Figure 7-24: Stages of an Emergency Plan ..................................................................................................... 195
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC TABLE OF CONTENTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 22
LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS
Photographs 1-1: Photographs Showing to the Project Site ................................................................................ 31
Photographs 10-1: CSR Activities ................................................................................................................... 229
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ABBREVIATION & ACRONYMS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 23
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AAQM Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
AERMOD Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System
BOD Biological Oxygen Demand
CPCB Central Pollution Control Board
COD Chemical Oxygen Demand
CO Carbon Monoxide
DGVCL Dakshin Gujarat Vij Corporation Limited
DISH Department of Industrial Safety Health
DMP Disaster Management Plan
DPL Deepak Phenolics Limited
EC Environmental Clearance
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
ESMPs Environmental and Social Management Plans
EHS Environment, Health and Safety
EER Evacuate, Escape and Rescue Plan
EPRG Emergency Response Planning Guidelines
ECC Emergency Control Center
FMECA Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis
GIDC Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation
GOI Government of India
GPCB Gujarat Pollution Control Board
GLC Ground Level Concentration
HAZOP Hazard and Operability Study
IAA Impact Assessment Authority
IMD Indian Meteorological Department
ICUN International Union for Conservation of Nature
IDLH Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health
KLD Kilo Liters per Day
LFT Liver Function Test
LEL Lower Flammability Limits
LCLo Lethal Concentration Low
MSIHC Manufacture, Storage, Import & Hazardous Chemical Rules
MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forests
MCLs’ Maximum Credible Loss Scenarios
MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet
NOC No Objection Certificate
NDT Non Destructive Testing
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
NOx Oxides of Nitrogen
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PEL Permissible Exposure Limits
PM Particulate Matter
PPEs Personnel Protective Equipment
PDCR Plan, Do, Check, Act
SEIAA State Level Environmental Impact Assessment Authorities
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ABBREVIATION & ACRONYMS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 24
SS Suspended Solid
SOx Oxides of Sulphur
SPL Sound Pressure Level
SMC Site Main Controller
STEL Short Time Exposure Limit
ToR Terms of References
TCLo Toxic Concentration Low
TLV Threshold Limit Value
TDS Total Dissolved Solid
TSDF Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility
USEPA United States Environment Protection Agency
UFL Upper Flammable Limits
VOC Volatile Inorganic Carbon
ZSI Zoological Survey of India
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 25
GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED
ACCIDENT: An accident may be defined as “an undesirable and unplanned event with or without or major or
minor damage consequence to life and/or property.”
AMBIENT: Ambient temperature is temperature of the surrounding area.
AN INCIDENT: An incident is emergent situation of any critical deviation in the process control or otherwise that
may lead to a major accident / potential emergency and disaster.
ANEMOMETER: A device used to measure speed of wind or any other moving gas.
ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY: Atmospheric Stability is defined in terms of vertical temperature gradient in the
atmosphere. It is usually described using the system of categories developed by Pasquill. The categories of stability
class are identified by the letter A to F (or sometimes A-G)
Neutral stability occurs typically, when there is total cloud cover and is designed by category D (The temperature
gradient = adiabatic lapse rate) Unstable conditions occur when the sun is shining. The unstable conditions are
designated by the letters A-C with A is the least stable condition stable conditions occur on clear, calm nights, when
the air near the ground is stratified and free from turbulence and are designated by the letter E &F. Sometimes an
additional category G is used for exceptionally stable conditions. Neutral conditions correspond to a rate of decrease
in temperature with height of about 1°C per meters, vertically. For the dispersion study D & C stability class has
been considered.
BLEVE (BOILING LIQUID EXPANDING VAPOUR CLOUD EXPLOSION):The event may have two folds, one;
flammable liquid under pressure rapidly spread in to the open area in form of vapour cloud, two; if this spreading
vapour cloud gets any source of ignition, then violently explosion took place produce missiles effect with secondary
fires and create heavy damages to the surrounding area. The phenomenon is called as BLEVE.
BUND/DYKE: Raised ground or a wall built around a tank or tank farm, to retain spills and prevent their spread,
thus reducing hazards.
BURNING RATE: The value is the rate (in millimeters per minute) at which the depth of a pool of liquid decreases
as the liquid burns.
CAS (CHEMICAL ABSTRACT SERVICE REGISTRY NUMBER): The unique identification number assigned each
compound/chemicals registered with the Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) is listed to aid in quick identification of
the compound.
CARCINOGEN: A substance capable of producing cancer (carcinoma).
CHRONIC: Of long duration or having frequent recurrence. Chronic health effects are those that become apparent
or continue for some time after exposure to hazardous chemicals.
Class ‘A’: Means petroleum having a flash point below 23°C. (e. g. Petrol, Hexane, Toluene, Naphtha)
Class ‘B’: Means petroleum having a flash point of23°C and above but below 65°C. (e. g. HSD, SKO, MTO etc.)
Class ‘C’: Means petroleum having a flash point of 65° C and above but below 93° C.
COMBUSTION PRODUCT: Material produced or; generated during the burning or oxidation of a material.
CONTAMINANT: A harmful, irritating or moisture material that is foreign to the normal atmosphere.
DANGEROUS OCCURRENCE: Dangerous Occurrences include bursting of vessel collapse of crane, derrick, hoist,
explosion, fire, leakage, escape of any molten metal / hot liquid, explosion of receiver /container, collapse of
building/ structure, as specified under schedule of Rule 103 of GFR 1995 and provision under section 88-A of the
Factories Act 1948, where in a factory any dangerous occurrence as specified occurs weather causing any bodily
injury or disability or not.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 26
DENSITY: The mass of Unit Volume of a substance e.g. kg/m3
DISASTER:A disaster is catastrophic consequence of a major emergency / accident that leads to, not only
extensive damage to life and property but also disrupts all normal human activity for a pretty long time and
requires a major national and international effort for rescue and rehabilitation of those affected.
DISTRICT CRISIS GROUP (DCG): The District Crisis Group is the apex body in the district to deal with major
chemical accidents and to provide expert guidance for handling chemical accidents.
Ref; Schedule 7 of Rule 8 of Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness & Response) Rule, 1996
DOMINO EFFECT: An effect by which a small hazardous incidence in a unit can escalate to surrounding area
causing heavy damages to man, properties &environment.
EMERGENCY: Emergency means a situation leading to a circumstance or set of circumstances in which there is
danger to the life or health of persons or which could result in big fire or explosion or pollution to the work and
outside environment, affecting the workers or neighborhood in a serious manner, demanding immediate action.
(Ref. Para 2(j) of Part I of Schedule XIX of Gujarat Factories Rules 1963(1995).
EMERGENCY INFORMATION PANEL: Every Goods carriage used for transporting any dangerous or hazardous
goods shall be legibly and conspicuously marked with an emergency information panel in each of three places of
the carriage.
ENDOTHERMIC PROCESS: A process accompanied by the absorption of heat.
EVACUATION: Removal of residents and other persons from an area of danger.
FIRE BALL: The burning of a flammable gas cloud, the bulk of which is initially over-rich i.e. (UFL). The whole
cloud appears to be on fire as combustion is taking place at eddy boundaries, when air is entrained.
FLAMMABILITY LIMITS (UFL- LFL): In fuel-air system a range of composition exists outside which a flame will
not propagate a substantial distance from an ignition source. The limiting fuel concentrations are termed the upper
flammable limit (UFL) and lower Flammable Limit (LFL)
FLASH FIRE: A burning of a flammable vapour cloud at very low flame propagation speed.
FLASH POINT: This is defined as the lowest temperature at which vapours above a combustible substance will
ignite in air when exposed to a flame.
Depending on the test method used, the values given are either Tag closed cup (C. C.) or Cleveland open cup (O,
C.) The values, along with those in 6.2 and 6.5 give an indication of the relative flammability of the chemical. In
general, the open cup value is about 10o to 15oF higher than the closed cup value.
HAZARD: Hazard may be defined as “the potential of an accident.” Hazard exists in man and the system of
materials and machines.
HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS: Any substance or material in a quantity or form which may be harmful to humans,
animals, crops, water systems, or other elements of the environment if accidentally released. Hazardous chemicals
include explosives, gases (compressed, liquefied or dissolved), flammable or combustible liquids, flammable solids
substance, toxic, corrosives, oxidizing substance, poisonous and insecticides substances.
“Hazardous Chemicals” means
Any Chemical, which satisfies any of the criteria, laid down in Part I of Schedule I and is listed in column 2 of Part II
of the schedule.
Any Chemical listed in Column 2 of Schedule 2.
Any Chemical listed in Column 2 of Schedule 3, as per provisions given below;
Rule 68J 1 (a) of GUJARAT FACTORIES RULES 1963 (Amended-1995)
Rule 2(e) of MANUFACTURE, STORAGE AND IMPORT OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL RULES, 1989.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 27
Rule 2(b) of Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness & Response) Rule, 1996.
HAZARDOUS PROCESS: Any process or activity in relation to an industry specified in the First Schedule under the
Section 2(cb) of the Factories Act 1948 (1987).
HAZCHEM CODES: The HAZCHEM code system was developed by the British Fire Service for use on vehicles
transporting dangerous substances. It consists or either two or three characters. The first character is a numeral in
the range of 1 to 4.
1 – Jets, 2 – Fog, 3 – Foam, 4 - Dry Agent
The second character is a letter selected from the range P, R, S, T, W, X, Y, Z.
Personnel Protection – 1The letter P, R, W or X indicate that a full chemical suit and breathing apparatus should be
warn. 2. The letters S, T, Y & Z indicate that breathing apparatus need only be warn if the substances are involved
in a fire.
Contain or dilute – The letters P, R, S, & T indicate dilution while W X Y & Z indicate containment.
The third character when appearing is E indicates that evacuation of persons in the neighboring areas must be
taken into consideration.
IC (INCIDENT CONTROLLER): He has to tackle the situation of operations on process/storage/event/occurrence
by taking technical decisions to control the emergency by responding the requisite experienced persons.
IDLH (IMMEDIATELY DANGEROUS TO LIFE AND HEALTH): The level of concentration immediately
dangerous to life or health from which a worker could escape without any impairing symptoms or any irreversible
health effect (NIOSH/OSHA). The concentrations are reported either parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per cubic
meter (mg/m3).
IGNITION TEMPERATURE: This is the minimum temperature at which the material will ignite without a spark or
flame being present. Along with the values in 6.1 and 6.2 above, it gives an indication of the relative flammability of
the chemical. It is sometimes called “auto ignition temperature”.
LC50 (LETHAL CONCENTRATION): Lethal Concentration level for air Bourne toxic substance.
LD50 (LETHAL DOSE): The term LD50 signifies that about 50% of the animals given the specified dose by mouth
will die. Thus for a grade 4 chemical (below 50 mg/kg) the toxic dose for 50% of animals weighting 70 kg (150 lb)
is 70 50 = 3, 500 mg=3.5 gr or less than 1 tea spoonful, it might be as little as a few drops. For a Grade 1 chemical
(5 to 15 g/kg) the LD50 would be between a pint and a quart for a 150 lb man.
LOCAL CRISIS GROUP (LCG): It is body constituted by Government, in the industrial pocked to deal with
chemical accidents and co-ordinate efforts in planning, preparedness and mitigation of chemical accidents.
Ref: Schedule 8 of Rule 8 of Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness & Response) Rule1996.
MAJOR ACCIDENT: Major Accident means an incident involving loss of the life inside or outside the site or ten or
more injuries inside and/or one or more injuries outside or release of toxic chemical or explosion or fire of spillage
of hazardous chemical result in ‘On Site’ or ‘Off Site’ emergencies or damage too equipment leading to stoppage of
process or adverse effects to the environment. (Ref. 1Rule 68(J)(1)(d) of Gujarat Factories Rules 1963(2004), 2.
Rule 2(j) of Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules, 1989. 3. Rule 2(f) of Chemical
Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness & Response) Rule, 1996).
MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDOUS (MAH) INSTALL ION: Isolated storage and industrial activity at a site,
handling (including transport through carrier or pipeline) of hazardous chemicals equal to or in excess of the
threshold quantities specified in column 3 of Schedule 2 and 3 respectively.
Ref: Rule 2(g) of Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness & Response) Rule1996.
ODOUR THRESHOLD: The lowest concentration of an air contaminant that can be detected by smell.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 28
OFF-SITE EMERGENCY PLAN: The objective of an Off Site Emergency Plan is to protect the life and property of
the neighborhood areas of the industrial unit. Off Site Emergency Plan shall be prepared by Government Authorities
as per Rule 14 of MSIHC Rules 1989 and follow the instruction under provision of CA(EPPR) Rules 1996.
ON SITE EMERGENCY PLAN: On Site Emergency Plan is to be prepared by occupier of industrial Units as per
Schedule 8A under Rule 68(J)(12) of Gujarat Factories Rules 1963(2004). Ref: Section 41(B)(4) of The Factories Act
1948, Schedule XI under Rule 13 of MSIHC Rules 1989, and Rule 5,7, & 9 of CA(EPPR) Rules 1996.
OSHA: Occupational Safety and Health Administration – U. S. Federal Agency
OVER PRESSURE: Maximum pressure above atmosphere pressure experienced during the pressure of a blast
wave from an explosion.
PLUME: Hazardous gas / vapour / cloud resulting from a continuous source release.
PUFF: Plum is instantaneous release of a gas / vapour from the source.
POOL FIRE: A pool of flammable liquid burning with a stationary diffusion flame
RESPONSE: The efforts to minimize the risks created in an emergency by protecting the people, the environment
and the property, and the efforts to return the scene to normal pre-emergency conditions. Persons who perform
the various response functions are termed “RESPONDERS”.
RISK: Risk of an accident may be defined as “the chance or probability or likelihood of an accident being caused in
a given man-material-machine system.
SENSITIVE POPULATIONS: Groups of people that may be more susceptible than the general population to the
toxic effects of the release due to pre-existing health condition (patients in hospitals, pregnant women etc.) or age
(elderly people infants, handicaps).
SPILL: Spill is large liquid releases from a bulk storage tank/process vessel.
SMC (SITE MAN CONTROLLER): He is overall responsible for directing operations & decides the actions,
consulting with incident controller &seniors, and handle &control the emergency.
SHORT – TERM INHALATION LIMIT (STEL): The parts of vapour (gas) per million parts of contaminated air by
volume at 25OC (77OF) and at one atmosphere of pressure is given. The limits are given in milligrams per cubic
meter for chemical that form a fine mist or dust. The values given are the maximum permissible average exposures
for the time periods specified.
SPECIFIC GRAVITY: The specific Gravity of a chemicals is the ratio of the weight of the solid or liquid to the
weight of an equal volume of water at 4OC (or at some other specified temperature) If the specific gravity is less
than 1.0 (or less than 1.03 in sea water) the chemical will float, if higher it will sink.
TLV (THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUE): TLV refer to airborne concentration of substances. There are three categories
of TLV.
TLV – TWA – Time Weighted Average.
TLV – STEL – Short term Exposure limit
TLV – for gases and vapour is usually expressed in PPM. (Part of the gas/vapour/million parts of air)
TOXIC CLOUD: Air borne mass of gases, vapours, fumes, dust or aerosols of toxic materials.
TOXICITY: The ability of a substance to cause damage to living tissue, impairment of the central nervous system,
serve illness or death when ingested, inhaled or absorbed by the skin.
VAPOUR CLOUD: Air borne dispersing hazardous vapours, which may or may not be visible as a “Cloud”
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 29
1 INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND
1.1 Purpose of the Report
Products falling under project/activities listed within the Schedule to the EIA notification dated September 14th 2006
(amended till date) requires prior Environmental Clearance (EC) from the Impact Assessment Authority (IAA) at the
Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) (for Category A project) or the State Level
Environmental Impact Assessment Authorities (SEIAA) (for Category B projects).
The existing EC on the name of Deepak Phenolics Limited is No. SEIAA/GUJ/EC/5(f), 4(d) & 1(d)/634/2016 dated
29th October 2016 is attached as Annexure 2. This report is prepared for EC for proposed expansion of Schedule
5(f) and 5(e) namely “Synthetic Organic Chemical” and “Petrochemical based Processing” requiring Environmental
Clearance from SEIAA, Gujarat as the project site is located within Notified Industrial Area. So it is considered as B
category project.
1.2 Identification of the Project Proponent and the Project
1.2.1 About Deepak Phenolics Limited.
Deepak Phenolics Limited (formerly known as Deepak Clean Tech Limited) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Deepak
Nitrite Limited.
The proposed expansion of Cumene/Phenol project is located at existing site of Dahej, Gujarat INDIA. Technology
and engineering services are being provided by Kellogg, Brown & Root International Inc. (KBR), USA for Phenol and
by UOP LLC, USA for Cumene. The EPCM contractor is ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly
known as UHDE, India) for both Phenol and Cumene. This is being set up as per MOU with the Government of
Gujarat during Vibrant Gujarat Summit 2011.
The company has also decided to put up Cyclohexanone plant, Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK) plant, Isopropyl
Alcohol (IPA) plant and Acetophenone Plant at Dahej, Gujarat within the same plot. This is being submitted for
Vibrant Gujarat Summit 2017.
1.2.2 The Project
The proposed project is an expansion project to expand the Cumene/Phenol plant and to put up Phenol and
Acetone derivative products like Cyclohexanone plant, Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK) plant, Acetophenone and iso-
propyl alcohol Plant as a part of downstream derivatives at the same location. The proposed expansion is located at
Plot No. 12/B/1, GIDC Dahej, Taluka Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat. The estimated cost of the proposed expansion
is INR ~400 Crores. Total plot area is 1,63,645 m2. Out of that, 1,40,125.73 m2 is owned by Deepak Phenolics
Limited and balance 23,519.27 m2 area is taken on lease from Deepak Nitrite Limited. The detailed production
capacities are given as below in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1: Production Capacity
S. No.
Name of Product Production Capacity in MT/ Month
Remarks Existing Proposed Total
1 Phenol 16667 4723 21390 The design capacity and plant machinery
will remain same.
Amendment in capacities is
considered based on full utilization of
2 Cumene 25000 2807 27807
3 Acetone 10000 2834 12834
4 Propane Return Stream 0 4367 4367
5 Alpha Methyl Styrene (AMS) 500 313 813
6 Benzene Rich Cut 175 -48 127
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 30
S. No.
Name of Product Production Capacity in MT/ Month
Remarks Existing Proposed Total
7 Recovery Column Bottoms / Heavies 730 1428 2158 design capacities considering design
margin.
A communication from licensor
confirming the proposed capacity
utilization is attached as Annexure 4.
8 Acetone Purge 0 17 17
9 Lights Hydrocarbon Purge 0 35 35
10 Poly- iso propyl Benzene (PIPB)
Drag 0 88 88
11
Hydrogenation Products : Cyclohexanone, cyclohexanol,
Methyl Iso-butyl Ketone (MIBK), Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA)
2650 14836 17486
12 Cyclohexanol Rich Stream 0 257 257
13 Acetone Rich Stream 0 289 289
14 Acetophenone 0 353 353
15 Wet IPA 0 250 250
Total 55722 32549 88271
16 Power (MW) 42 0 42
17 Steam (TPH) 100 100 200
1.3 Brief Description of Nature, Size, Location of the Project and its Importance to Country,
Region
1.3.1 Nature of the Project
The proposed project is an expansion project to expand the Cumene/Phenol plant and to put up Phenol and
Acetone derivative products like Cyclohexanone plant, Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK) plant and Acetophenone
Plant as a part of downstream derivatives at the same location. The estimated cost of the proposed project is INR
~400 Crores.
1.3.2 Size of the Project
The proposed project will cover a plot area of 1,63,645 m2. Out of that, 1,40,125.73 m2 is owned by Deepak
Phenolics Limited and balance 23,519.27 m2 area is taken on lease from Deepak Nitrite Limited. The Production
capacities are as mentioned in Table 1-1. Unit has consent to establish for existing facility which attached as
Annexure 3.
1.3.3 Location
The proposed project is located at plot no. 12/B/1 of GIDC Dahej, in Bharuch District of Gujarat state. Photographs
showing the project site are presented in Photographs 1-1.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 31
Photographs 1-1: Photographs Showing to the Project Site
1.4 Importance of the Project to the Country/Region
Phenol: Global market
In the next five years, global phenol capacity is expected to increase by a total of 12%, with Northeast Asia
accounting for about 72% of this capacity increase, to raise its share of total global capacity to 46% in 2020.
Overall, phenol production has increased at an average annual rate of 1.8% since 2010. Production growth is
expected to increase at a higher average rate of 2.7% per year. The following pie chart shows world consumption
of phenol globally.
Phenol: Domestic market
Phenol Market in India
Phenol Capacity: 85 KTA (HOC 45 KTA & SII 40 KTA)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 32
Phenol Production: 75 KTA
Phenol Demand: 300 KTA
Phenol Imports: 225 KTA
A key point to be noted is that the proposed phenol plant would substitute an equivalent volume which currently
being imported into India. Therefore, marketing uncertainties are minimal. This is import substitute product which
will save foreign exchange of 40 MMUSD/ Year and is truly in line with “Make in India” initiative.
India will be a very close second after China in terms of demand growth, with phenol consumption increasing at an
average rate of 7.7% per year over the next five years. Imports into India have also grown significantly, at 16%
per year over the past five years.
Phenol: Demand supply gap
In India there is a gap of 225 KTPA Phenol which is covered through import. Out of 300 KTPA Cumene produced,
about 270 KTPA will be captively used for phenol production and rest will be sold. There is enough gap in country
for this small quantity of Cumene sale.
Acetone: Global market
Globally, production growth of acetone is expected to increase at a higher average rate of 3.0 % per year. For Asia
region, Acetone growth rates will be 4% per year. The below figure shows the world acetone demand based on the
application.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 33
Source: RAJEEV M. PANDIA, “THE PHENOL-ACETONE VALUE CHAIN: PROSPECTS AND OPPORTUNITIES”, SEOUL,
2013
Acetone: Domestic market
The demand for acetone in the domestic market has almost doubled in the last decade. Due to static production
capabilities, the dependency of the country on imports has increased as domestic production struggles to keep up
with the demand. A huge disparity in domestic demand and supply status is visible due to lack of any planned
projects for acetone production. Since a majority of domestic acetone is fulfilled through imports from other
countries, acetone pricing is vulnerable to international demand, supply situation and volatility in the international
market. Acetone Market in India
Acetone Capacity: 51 KTA (HOC 27 KTA & SII 24 KTA)
Acetone Production: 45 KTA
Acetone Demand: 200 KTA
Acetone Imports: 180 KTA
Phenol Plant Clear Case for India
Phenol Demand in India – 300000 MT/ Annum
Acetone Demand in India– 200000 Mt / Annum
Expected growth of Phenol is 8%
No manufacturing facility for BPA& Polycarbonate in India
Import Duty on Phenol in India – 7.5%
Import duty on Cumene in India – 5%
Phenol and Acetone are key precursors to a host of other chemicals which are highly correlated to the GDP and
Income growth taking place in India. Expected growth rate in India of Phenol / Acetone will be around 8% CAGR
for next few years.
Acetone: Demand supply gap
Acetone demand in India is 200 KTPA against production of 45 KTPA and there is sufficient gap for production.
Acetone is also import substitute product and shall save foreign exchange of 15 MMUSD/year for the country.
Cyclohexanone: Global market
Cyclohexanone is captively consumed on site for the production of adipic acid and caprolactam (over 95%), so only
a small amount enters the world’s trade markets.
Less than 4% is consumed in markets other than nylon. This includes use as solvents for paints and dyes, in
pesticides, and as an intermediate for pharmaceuticals, films, soaps, and coatings.
The following pie chart shows world consumption of Cyclohexanone:
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 34
Much of this demand is sustained by its consumption in caprolactam (69% of total demand in 2014), which is the
main precursor to supply the expansive nylon production. Other chemical demand includes cyclohexylamines;
isobornylcyclohexanol, which is used in the perfumery industry; polyester polyols; and other small chemical
applications.
Cyclohexanone: Domestic Market
Cyclohexanone Capacity: 0 KTPA
Cyclohexanone Production: 0 KTPA
Cyclohexanone Demand: 35 KTPA
Cyclohexanone Imports: 35 KTPA
Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK): Global market
Total consumption of MIBK grew at an average annual rate of almost 7% during 2011–14. World MIBC statistics
are difficult to estimate, but overall, MIBC will experience positive growth in lube oil applications and as a flotation
frother (especially in actively mined regions). Consumption of MIBC worldwide is forecast to grow at an average
annual rate of 2.5-3.0% during 2014-19.
The following pie chart shows world consumption of MIBK:
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 35
Consumption of MIBK is expected to stay relatively flat in the developed regions. Its use in rubber antiozonants has
grown over the last three years (from approximately 25% of total MIBK consumption in 2011 to 32% in 2014 in the
major consuming countries/regions), driven by increased tire production Asia.
Stronger demand and higher feedstock costs helped boost prices for MIBK and MIBC throughout 2010 and 2011
after the economic downturn.
Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK): Domestic Market
MIBK Capacity: 0 KTPA
MIBK Production: 0 KTPA
MIBK Demand: 30 KTPA
MIBK Imports: 30 KTPA
Isopropyl alcohol (IPA): Global market
Consumption of industrial-grade IPA (as a direct solvent and for chemical derivatives) accounted for 77% of total
IPA demand in the major consuming regions in 2014, and direct solvent applications accounted for approximately
63% of total industrial-grade demand.
The following pie chart shows world consumption of isopropyl alcohol:
The IPA market will continue to be oversupplied during 2014-19, especially with global demand growing at an
estimated average annual rate of 1.9% through 2019 and capacity growing at an average annual rate of 2.9%.
Isopropyl alcohol (IPA): Domestic Market
IPA Capacity: 60 KTPA
IPA Production: 60 KTPA
IPA Demand: 130 KTPA
IPA Imports: 70 KTPA
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 36
Acetophenone: Global Market
One of the key drivers for the global acetophenone market can be attributed to the application of precursor to
resins. Also, increasing demand from end use industries such as use in pharmaceuticals, food & beverages,
consumer goods (detergent, soaps, lotions and creams) are fuelling the growth of the acetophenone market.
The global acetophenone market is dominated by Asia Pacific (excluding Japan) region in terms of global
consumption of acetophenone. The emerging economies such as China and India witness an increased demand for
high end and luxury products as a result of increase in disposable income and living standard.
Acetophenone: Domestic Market
Acetophenone Capacity: 0.48 KTPA
Acetophenone Production: 0.48 KTPA
Acetophenone Demand: 3.5 KTPA
Acetophenone Imports: 3.02 KTPA
1.4.1 Investment
An investment of ~ INR 400 crores will be done in the project.
1.4.2 Direct Jobs
The employment generation due to the Phenol and Cumene project will be more than 150 people.
1.4.3 Indirect Jobs
During the construction and execution phase of the project, it is estimated that about ~2000 workers will be
involved for a period of about 24 months. During operation phase of the project, it is estimated that about ~250
workers will be involved.
1.5 Status of EC Process
The status of the progress of Deepak Phenolics’s EC application is provided in Table 1-2.
Table 1-2: Project Status till Date
S. No. Process Date
1 Submission of Form I along with Proposed ToR to SEAC, Gujarat 11th January 2017
2 Presentation for Terms of References (ToR) for EIA study at SEAC, Gujarat 17th February 2017
3 Receipt of ToR Letter from SEAC, Gujarat 24th April 2017
1.6 Scope of the Study
As per ToR letter No. SEIAA/GUJ/TOR/5(f)&5(e)/329/2017 dated 24th April,2017 issued by SEIAA, Gujarat, attached
as Annexure 1, the scope of work for this EIA includes collection of baseline data with respect to major
environmental components, viz. air, noise, water, land, biological and socio-economic components for three
months, undertake impact assessment using appropriate computational modelling and propose appropriate
Mitigation measures for any potential environmental impacts.
This EIA report complies with the directions of the Expert Appraisal Committee as per the approved Terms of
Reference. Summarized details of the same are provided in Table 1-3.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 37
Table 1-3: Compliance with the Proposed Terms of References
S. No.
ToR points Action plan
1 A tabular chart with index for point-wise compliance of below
mentioned TORs. It is provided in this table
2
Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal, use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of EIA report, including EMP and the post-project monitoring plan in brief.
Summary of the project is provided in Chapter 11, Page 232.
3 Justification for selecting the proposed product and unit size. Details are provided in Chapter 1, Section 1.3,
Page 30.
4 Land requirement for the project including its break up for
various purposes, its availability and optimization.
Land allotment letter from GIDC is given in Annexure 5. Break up of land at site is given in
Chapter 2, Figure 2-3 & Table 2-3, Page 50 & 51. GIDC letter for providing infrastructure to
Deepak Phenolics Limited is given in Chapter 2, Figure 2-6, Page 70.
5
Land possession documents. Copy of NA order showing permission to use the project land for industrial purpose. If
located in GIDC, copy of plot holding certificate obtained from GIDC Authority.
GIDC letter for providing infrastructure to Deepak Phenolics Limited is given in Chapter 2, Figure
2-6, Page 70.
6 Location of the project site and nearest habitats with distances
from the project site to be demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).
Toposheet of the project site with demarcation of nearest habitation with distance is provided as
Annexure 7.
7 Topography details of the project area. Toposheet of the project site is provided as
Annexure 8
8 Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study
area.
Geological features and geohydrological status of the study area is given in Chapter 3, Section
3.10, Page 114.
9
In case of project located outside notified area: Legal Undertaking stating that unit is complying the three conditions [i.e. water consumption less than 25 M3/day; Fuel consumption less than 25 TPD; and not covered in the category of MAH units
as per the Management, Storage, Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules (MSIHC Rules), 1989] as per the amendment to
EIA Notification, 2006 vide SO 1599 (E) dated 25/06/2014.
No application is required as unit is located in notified industrial estate
10 Present land use pattern of the study area shall be given based
on satellite imagery.
Landuse patter of the study area is given in Chapter 3, Figure 3-1, Table 3-4, Page 91 &
92 .
11
Layout plan of the factory premises clearly demarcating various units within the plant. Provision of separate entry & exit and
adequate margin all round the periphery for unobstructed easy movement of the emergency vehicle / fire tenders without
reversing back. Mark the same in the plant layout.
Site layout and its break up is provided in Chapter 2, Figure 2-3 & Table 2-3, Page 50 & 51.
Map showing separate entry, exist and tanker movement during emergency without reversing
back is provided as Annexure 9.
12 Technical details of the plant/s along with details on best
available technologies (BAT), proposed technology and reasons for selecting the same.
Details of BAT is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.6, Page 53.
13 Product spectrum (Proposed products along with production
Capacity) and processes.
Details of production capacity is given in Chapter 1, Section 1.3.2, Page 30.
Process description is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.5, Page 53.
14 Chemical name of each proposed product to be manufactured. Details on end use of each product. (Provide CAS number of all
the products & raw materials. In case of Dyes, CI number).
Name of products is given in Chapter 1, Table 1-1, Page 29.
End use of the product is given in Chapter 2, Table 2-10, Page 62.
15 Details on raw materials, source and storage within the
premises. Properties of raw material is given in Chapter 2,
Section 2.10, Page 64.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 38
S. No.
ToR points Action plan
Source of material is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.12, Page 66.
Storage of raw material and products are given in Chapter 2, Section 2.11, Page 65.
16
Details of complete manufacturing process / operations of each product along with chemical reactions, process flow diagram describing each unit processes and unit operations along with
material balance, consumption of raw materials etc.
Process description along with flow diagram and material balance is given in Chapter 2, Section
2.5, Page 53.
17 Details on strategy for the implementation of cleaner
production activities. Implementation of cleaner production activities are
given in Chapter 2, Section 2.9, Page 62.
18 Assessment of source of the water supply with adequacy of the same to meet with the requirements for the project. Permission obtained from the concern authority for supply of raw water.
GIDC permission for water supply is given in Figure 2-6, Page 70.
19 Undertaking stating that no bore well shall be dug within the premises (If project is located within the Industrial estate).
Undertaking stating that no bore well shall be dug within premises is given as Annexure 6.
20 Details on water balance including quantity of effluent generated, recycled & reused. Details of methods to be
adopted for the water conservation.
Water balance showing effluent generation, recycled and reuse is given in Chapter 2, Figure
2-5, Page 69.
21 Explore the possibilities for Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) or
Efforts to minimize effluent discharge and to maintain quality of receiving water body.
ZLD is not applicable
Water conservation will be proposed to reduce fresh water demand given in Chapter 2, Section
2.14.6, Page 78.
22
Segregation of waste streams, characterization and quality with specific treatment and disposal of each stream including action plan for maximum recycle of treated waste water and minimum
discharge for effluent.
Wastewater characterization is given in Chapter 2, Table 2-17, Page 71.
23
Capacity of ETP in KL/day. Details of ETP including dimensions of each unit along with schematic flow diagram. Inlet,
transitional and treated effluent qualities with specific efficiency of each treatment unit in reduction in respect of all
concerned/regulated environmental parameters. Inlet effluent quality should be based on worst case scenario considering
production of most polluting products that can be manufactured in the plant concurrently.
Details of ETP is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.14.2, Page 71.
24
In case of discharge into GIDC drainage / Pipeline:
I. Copy of permission letter with quantity (KL/day) from the concern authority of drainage network / pipeline with confirmation for spare capacity available to take
additional effluent.
II. Characteristics of the combined effluent and treated water to be sent to Common pipeline with reference
to the MoEFCC/CPCB/GPCB discharge norms.
I. GIDC permission for use of drainage is given in Figure 2-6, Page 70.
II. Combine inlet quality and treated water quality is given in Chapter 2, Table 2-18, Page 72.
25
In case of wastewater sent to Common Facilities (CF) like CETP, MEE, Spray Dryer etc. Details of Common facilities including;
1) Total capacity of the CF
2) Copy of CC&A of the CF.
3) Actual load at present (Qualitative and Quantitative – KL per day)
4) Booked quantity & Spare capacity of CF
5) Copies of XGN generated Inspection reports with analysis reports of the water/ Air/ Hazardous samples collected by GPCB (Last 2 year). Copies of instructions issued by GPCB in last 2 year and point wise compliance thereof.
6) Copies of Show- cause notices, closure notices etc. served by the GPCB and its compliance
Not applicable as unit will not sent wastewater to common facilities.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 39
S. No.
ToR points Action plan
7) Recommendations and suggestions of the last two Environment Audit reports of CETP and its compliance report.
8) Common Facility Upgradation scheme, if any.
26
In case of Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) :
i. Action plan for ‘Zero’ discharge of effluent shall be included. Notarized undertaking for assuring that underground drainage connection will not be taken in the unit.
ii. Economical and technical viability of the effluent treatment system to achieve Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD).
iii. Certification of adequacy of proposed ZLD scheme through credible institutes of National repute.
iv. To estimate & monitor ground water quality & its contamination status, piezometer wells, one on up gradient of the groundwater flow and other three on the down gradient side of the ground water flow of the proposed project at different depth based on available ground water depth shall be established and all the parameters mentioned in IS 10:500 for potable water standard shall be monitored.
Not applicable as unit is not ZLD
27
In case of in-house MEE for waste water treatment: Capacity of MEE in KL/hr. Technical details of MEE including evaporation capacity, steam required for evaporation, adequacy of the
proposed boiler to supply steam for evaporation in addition to the steam required for the process etc. Techno-economical
viability of the evaporation system. Control measures proposed for the evaporation system in order to avoid/reduce gaseous
emission/VOC from evaporation of industrial effluent containing solvents & other chemicals.
Not applicable as unit will not installed MEE in-house
28 Technical details of ATFD/Crystallizer/Dryer, RO/NF system etc.
(If any).
Unit will not install ATFD, Crystallizer, Dryer, NF. Unit will install RO. Details of RO System is
provided in Chapter 2, Section 2.14.4, Page 74.
29 Undertaking stating that a separate electric meter will be
provided for the waste water treatment system viz. ETP, RO, MEE, Spray dryer etc. (Whichever is applicable)
Undertaking provided stating that separate Electric meter will be provided is given as Annexure 6
30 Economical and technical viability of the effluent treatment
system.
The scheme of effluent treatment is used based on treatability study by selecting best techno
commercial option of treatment.
31
Plans for management, collection and disposal of waste streams to be generated from spillage, leakages, vessel
washing, used container washing etc. Measures proposed for preventing effluent discharge during unforeseen circumstances.
Spill control mechanism is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.14.7, Page 78.
32
Action plan for reuse of waste streams like Spent acids, Poly Aluminium Chloride etc. within premises to convert into
valuable products instead of sending outside to actual end-users.
Spend acids and poly aluminium chloride will not be generated. Hence, action plan for the same is not
applicable.
33 One season Site-specific micro-meteorological data using
temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be incorporated.
One season Site-specific micro-meteorological data of summer season is given in Chapter 3, Section
3.6, Page 94.
34
Anticipated environmental impacts due to the proposed project/production may be evaluated for significance and based
on corresponding likely impacts VECs (Valued Environmental Components)
may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted within the study area for all the concerned/identified VECs and likely
impacts will have to be assessed for their magnitude in order to identify mitigation measures.
Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures are given in Chapter 4, Page 132.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 40
S. No.
ToR points Action plan
35
One complete season base line ambient air quality data (except monsoon season) to be given along with the dates of monitoring. The parameters to be covered shall be in
accordance with the revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) as well as project specific parameters like NH3, HCl, CL2, HBr, VOC etc. Locations of the monitoring stations should be so decided so as
to take into consideration the pre-dominant downwind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors. There should
be at least one monitoring station in the upwind direction. There should be
at least one monitoring station in the pre dominant downwind direction at a location where maximum ground level
concentration is likely to occur.
Monitoring was done in summer 2017. Details of AAQM are provided in Chapter 3, Section 3.7,
Page 97.
36
Modeling indicating the likely impact on ambient air quality due to proposed activities. The details of model used and input parameters used for modeling should be provided. The air
quality contours may be shown on location map clearly indicating the location of sensitive receptors, if any, and the
habitation. The wind rose showing pre-dominant wind direction should also be indicated on the map. Impact due to vehicular
movement shall also be included into the prediction using suitable model. Results of Air dispersion modeling should be superimposed on satellite Image /geographical area map.
Detail of air dispersion modelling is given in Annexure 15.
37 Base line status of the noise environment, impact of noise on
present environment due to the project and proposed measures for noise reduction including engineering controls.
Baseline status of noise monitoring is provided in Chapter 3, Section 3.8. Page 103.
Impact of noise is given in Chapter 4, Section 4.6, Page 153.
38
Specific details of
a) Process gas emission from each unit process with its quantification.
b) Air pollution Control Measures (APCM) proposed for process gas emission. Adequacy of the air pollution control measures (APCM) for process gas emission
measures to achieve the GPCB norms.
c) Details of the utilities required.
d) Type and quantity (MT/hr & MT/Day) of fuel to be used for each utility.
e) Flue gas emission rate emission from each utility.
f) Air Pollution Control Measures (APCM) proposed to each of the utility along with its adequacy
g) List the project specific sources of fugitive emission along with its quantification and proposed measures to control
it.
h) Details on tail gas treatment.(If any)
a) Process gas emission with its quantification is given in Chapter 4, Section 4.4, Page 145.
b) Details of APCM is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.16.1, Page 80.
c) Details of the utilities are given in Chapter 2, Section 2.13, Page 67.
d) Fuel used is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.15, Page 79.
e) Flue gas emission details are given in Chapter 4, Section 4.4, Page 145
f) Adequacy of stack is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.16, Page 79.
g) Details of fugitive emission is given in Chapter 4, Section 4.4.3, Page 151.
h) Details of tail gas treatment: There will not be generation of tail gas hence treatment is not
required.
39 Action plan for odour control to be submitted. Details of odour control is given in Chapter 4,
Section 4.4.4, Page 152.
40
Management plan for solid/hazardous waste including storage, handling, utilization and safe disposal as per the Hazardous and
Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016. CPCB guidelines in respect of specific treatment,
such as solar evaporation, incineration, etc., need to be followed. How the manual handling of the hazardous wastes
will be minimized. Methodology of de-contamination and disposal of discarded containers and its record keeping
Details of hazardous waste management is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.17, Page 83.
41 Membership of Common Environmental Infrastructure like
TSDF, Common Incineration Facility (CHWIF) etc. Membership of SEEPL is given in Chapter 2,
Figure 2-11, Page 85.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 41
S. No.
ToR points Action plan
42
Name and quantity of each type of solvents to be used for proposed production. Details of in-house solvent recovery
system including mass balance, solvent loss, recovery efficiency (% recovery), feasibility of reusing the recovered solvents etc.
for each type of solvent.
Not applicable
43 Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and
proposed, to assess the possible residual impacts on VECs. Monitoring Plan is given in Chapter 6, Section
6.1, Page 170.
44
A detailed EMP including the protection and mitigation measures for impact on human health and environment as well
as detailed monitoring plan and environmental management cell proposed for implementation and monitoring of EMP. The EMP should also include the concept of waste minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, energy conservation, and
natural resource conservation. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum earmarked for environment pollution control
measures.
Detailed EMP is given in Chapter 10, Page 219.
Cost on environment matter is given in Chapter 10, Table 10-9, Page 230.
45 Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and the recognized
agencies if proposed for conducting monitoring.
a) Continuous online monitoring system will be installed on the flue gas and process stacks to monitor the pollutant concentration with an arrangement to reflect the online monitoring result on the company's server, which can be accessed by the GPCB on real time basis. Typical parameters will be monitored as per GPCB norms.
b) Wastewater quality monitoring for all GPCB parameters will be done through in-house laboratory.
c) LDRA surveys for fugitive emission controls.
d) Benzene monitoring with dragger tubes will be carried out.
e) All the measuring instruments shall be GPCB approved type.
f) Unit will do third party monitoring on periodic basis or as per the requirement of regulatory authority.
46 Permission from PESO, Nagpur for storage of solvents, other
toxic chemicals, if any. PESO approval is provided as Annexure 10
47
Occupational health impacts on the workers and mitigation measures proposed to avoid the human health hazards along
with the personal protective equipment to be provided. Provision of industrial hygienist and monitoring of the
occupational injury to workers as well as impact on the workers. Plan for periodic medical check-up of the workers
exposed. Details of work place ambient air quality monitoring plan as per Gujarat Factories Rules.
Details of impact on occupational health of the workers are given in Chapter 10, Section 10.8,
Page 227.
Competent personnel will be hired for the monitoring of the occupational injury to the
workers.
Periodic and pre- employment medical check- up of the workers is carried out. List of the tests are given in Chapter 7, Section 7.4, Page 214.
Periodic work place monitoring will be carried out as per the Gujarat Factories Rules.
48
Details on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the plant operations and occupational safety and health protection measures. Proposal for Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR)
program as per the CPCB guidelines.
Details of LDAR is given in Chapter 4, Section 4.4.3, Page 152.
49
Risk assessment including prediction of the worst-case scenario and maximum credible accident scenarios should be carried out. The worst-case scenario should take into account the
maximum inventory of storage at site at any point of time. The risk contours should be plotted on the plant layout map clearly showing which of the facilities would be affected in case of an accident taking place. Based on the same, proposed safeguard
Consequence analysis is given in Chapter 7, Section 7.2, Page 172.
Disaster management plan is given in Chapter 7, Section 7.3, Page 192.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 42
S. No.
ToR points Action plan
measures including On-Site / Off-Site Emergency Plan should be provided.
50 MSDS of all the products and raw materials. MSDS is given in the soft copy
51
Details of hazardous characteristics and toxicity of raw materials and products to be handled and the control measures proposed to ensure safety and avoid the human health impacts.
This shall include the details of Antidotes also.
Details of control measures to handle chemicals are given in Chapter 4, Section 4.4.3, Page 151. And detail of antidotes are given in Chapter 7,
Table 7-30, Page 211.
52
Details of quantity of each hazardous chemical (including solvents) to be stored, Material of Construction (MoC) of major
hazardous chemical storage tanks, dyke details, threshold storage
quantity as per schedules of the Manufacture, Storage & Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules of major hazardous chemicals, size of the biggest storage tank to be provided for each raw
material & product etc. How the manual handling of the hazardous chemicals will be minimized?
Storage details are given in the Chapter 2,
Section 2.11, Page 65.
All the storage tanks are provided with adequate
safety measures to prevent any fugitive emissions,
spillage, and any accident related to the handling of
chemicals. Manual handling of the chemicals shall
be minimized by having a closed system of transfer
of materials through pipelines which shall be
properly metered. Hazard identification and
proposed safety measures are given in Chapter 4,
Section 4.12.1, Page 167.
53
Details of the separate isolated storage area for flammable chemicals. Details of flame proof electrical fittings, DCP
extinguishers and other safety measures proposed. Detailed fire control plan for flammable substances and processes showing hydrant pipeline network, provision of DG Sets, fire pumps,
jockey pump, toxic gas detectors etc.
DPL shall employ a dedicated firefighting system covering all the sections of the plant feeding to
various hydrants, monitors and deluge water spray systems. Total of 6 (4+2) fire pumps and 2 jockey pumps shall be employed. Out of the 6 fire pumps 3 shall be diesel engine driven and other 3 shall be
motor driven. The entire fire water system is designed for a minimum pressure of 7 kg/cm2 (g).
Details related to Firefighting system is given in Chapter 7, Section 7.3.12, Page 208.
Proper fire network layout, gas detectors locations are attached as Annexure 17 and Annexure 18
respectively.
Fire alarm points, fire hydrants, foam pourers, CO2 cylinders will also be provided.
54 Submit checklist in the form of Do’s & Don’ts of preventive
maintenance, strengthening of HSE, manufacturing utility staff for safety related measures.
List of Do’s and Don’ts are given in Chapter 7, Section 7.3.15, Page 212.
55
Detailed five year greenbelt development program including annual budget, planning schedule, species, width of
plantations, number of trees to be planted, area under green belt development [with map], budgetary outlay etc. along with
commitment of the management to carry out the tree plantation activities outside the premises at appropriate places
in the nearby areas and elsewhere.
Detailed five year greenbelt development program is given in Chapter 10, Table 10-6, Page 225.
56 Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width of plantations, planning schedule, etc., in accordance to CPCB
published guidelines.
Detail of greenbelt is given in Chapter 10, Section 10.6.1, Page 224.
57
Detailed socio-economic development measures including community welfare program most useful in the project area for the overall improvement of the environment. Submit a detailed
plan for social corporate responsibilities, with appropriate budgetary provisions for the next five years and activities
proposed to be carried out; specific to the current demographic status of the area.
Detailed socio-economic development measures are given in Chapter 10, Section 10.9, Page 228.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 43
S. No.
ToR points Action plan
58
a) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be
detailed in the EIA report.
b) Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to bring into focus any
infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the
EIA.
Environment policy is given as Annexure 25
59
What is the hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for
ensuring compliance with the EC conditions. Details of this system may be given.
Hierarchical system to deal with the environmental issues is given in Chapter 10, Section 10.11,
Page 230.
60
Does the company have a system of reporting of non- compliances / violations of environmental norms to the Board
of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be
detailed in the EIA Report.
As unit have reporting mechanism, the non-compliance report goes to board of director & stack
holders of the company as and when required.
61 Phase wise project implementation schedule with bar chart and
time frame, in terms of site development, infrastructure provision, EMS implementation etc.
Bar chart of project implementation is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.18, Page 86.
62 Certificate of accreditation issued by the NABET, QCI to the environmental consultant should be incorporated in the EIA
Report.
Certificate of accreditation issued by the NABET, QCI is attached as Annexure 21
63
An undertaking by the Project Proponent on the ownership of the EIA report as per the MoEF&CC OM dated 05/10/2011 and
an undertaking by the Consultant regarding the prescribed TORs have been complied with and the data submitted is
factually correct as per the MoEF&CC OM dated 04/08/2009.
Undertaking of PP on the ownership of the report is attached as Annexure 19
64
In case of Expansion of the project
a. Need for the proposed expansion should be justified in detail.
b. Records of any legal breach of Environmental laws i.e. details of show- cause notices, closure notices etc. served
by the GPCB to the existing unit in last five years and actions taken then after for prevention of pollution.
c. Copies of Environmental Clearances obtained for the existing plant, its point wise compliance report.
d. Environmental audit reports for last 3 years and compliance of its recommendations/Suggestions. (Include
latest audit report and its compliance.)
e. Copy of Consent to Operate (CC&A) obtained along with point wise compliance status of all the conditions
stipulated therein.
f. Compliance of MoEFCC circulars vide No: J-11011/618/2010-IAII (I) dated 30/05/2012 and J-
11013/41/2006-IA-II (I) dated 20/10/2009.
g. Copies of XGN generated Inspection reports with analysis reports of the water/Air/Hazardous samples collected by
GPCB (Last 2 year). Copies of instructions issued by GPCB in last 2 year and point wise compliance thereof.
a. Need for the proposed expansion is given in Chapter 1, Section 2.2, Page 46.
b. There is no any litigation pending.
c. Existing EC is given in Annexure 2 and compliance of the same is given in Annexure 20.
d. Unit yet not have Consent to Operate. So environmental audit is not applicable.
e. Unit yet not have Consent to Operate.
f. Unit had applied for Certified compliance report to MoEFCC, Bhopal. Inward letter for the same is
attached as Annexure 22.
g. Not applicable as unit has just obtained consent to establish
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 44
S. No.
ToR points Action plan
65
In case of project is located in Ankleshwar-Panoli, Vatva- Narol & Vapi GIDC.
A. Compliance of MOEFCC’s OM no. J-11013/5/2010-IA.II (I) dated 25/11/2016 regarding lifting of moratorium on the consideration of projects for environmental clearance.
B. Compliance of direction under section 18 (1) (b) of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1974
issued by CPCB dated 31/03/2016 regarding compliance of CETP.
a) Action initiated by GPCB, if any, against proposed unit regarding non-compliance of prescribed standards
under the various environmental laws.
b) Performance of CETP with respect to current hydraulic load & prescribed standards with No Objection
Certificate of CETP regarding incorporation of the proposed unit for acceptance of waste water.
c) Performance of TSDF site with respect to current load & prescribed standards with No Objection Certificate of TSDF site regarding incorporation of the proposed
unit for acceptance of hazardous waste to the common infrastructure.
d) Copies of quarterly action report taken for the above points submitted to the CPCB.
e) Report of GPCB which have conducted monitoring as per the said direction by CPCB dated 31/03/2016.
Not applicable as unit is not located in Ankleshwar, Panoli, Vatva, Narol & Vapi GIDC
A SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EIA STUDIES FOR
SYNTHETIC ORGANIC CHEMICALS INDUSTRY
1 Details on solvents to be used, measures for solvent recovery
and for emissions control Not applicable
2 Details of process emissions from the proposed unit and its
arrangement to control Details of APCM is given in Chapter 2, Section
2.16.1, Page 80.
3 Ambient air quality data should include VOC, other process-specific pollutants* like NH3*, chlorine*, HCl*, HBr*, H2S*,
HF*,etc.,(*-as applicable)
Monitoring will be done in summer 2017. Details of AAQM are provided in Chapter 3, Section 3.7,
Page 97.
4 Work zone monitoring arrangements for hazardous chemicals Unit will do third party monitoring on periodic basis or as per the requirement of regulatory authority.
5 Detailed effluent treatment scheme including segregation of
effluent streams for units adopting 'Zero' liquid discharge Details of ETP is given in Chapter 2, Section
2.14.2, Page 71.
6 Action plan for odour control to be submitted SO2 from boiler stack will be controlled by
neutralisation of lime. No other control measures are required
7 A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding signed with
cement manufacturers indicating clearly that they co-process organic solid/hazardous waste generated.
Agreement with cement manufacturing unit is given as Annexure 23.
8 Authorization/Membership for the disposal of liquid effluent in
CETP and solid/hazardous waste in TSDF, if any Membership of SEEPL is given in Chapter 2,
Figure 2-11, Page 85.
9 Action plan for utilization of MEE/dryers salts Not applicable as MEE/ dryers salts is not installed
at site
10 Material Safety Data Sheet for all the Chemicals are being
used/will be used MSDS is given in the soft copy
11 Authorization/Membership for the disposal of solid/hazardous
waste in TSDF Membership of SEEPL is given in Chapter 2,
Figure 2-11, Page 85.
12 Details of incinerator if to be installed Details of incinerator is given in Chapter 2,
Section 2.16.1, Page 80
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC INTRODUCTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 45
S. No.
ToR points Action plan
13 Risk assessment for storage and handling of hazardous
chemicals/solvents. Action plan for handling & safety system to be incorporated
Storage of raw material and products are given in Chapter 2, Section 2.11, Page 65.
Details of control measures to handle chemicals are given in Chapter 4, Section 4.4.3, Page 151.
14 Arrangements for ensuring health and safety of workers
engaged in handling of toxic materials Handle chemicals are given in Chapter 4, Section
4.4.3, Page 151
B
SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EIA STUDIES FOR PETROCHEMICAL BASED PROCESSING (PROCESSES
OTHER THEN CRACKING AND REFORMATION AND NOT COVERED UNDER THE COMPLEXES)
1 Details on requirement of raw material, its source of supply and
storage at the plant. Transportation of raw material is given in Chapter
2, Section 2.12, Page 66.
2 Complete process flow diagram for all products with material
balance.
Product details with flow diagram and material balance is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.7, Page
54.
3 Details on requirement of auxiliary chemicals, solvents,
catalysts, reactors and utilities to support the unit processes.
Raw materials details are given in Chapter 2, Section 2.11, Page 65.
Details of utilities provided in Chapter 2, Section 2.13, Page 67.
Equipment list is given as Annexure 24.
4 Brief description of equipments for various process. Equipment list is given as Annexure 24.
5 Details of proposed source- specific pollution control schemes
and equipments to meet the national standards. Details of APCM is given in Chapter 2, Section
2.16.1, Page 80.
6 Details on VOC emission control system from vents, stacks,
fugitive emissions and flare management, etc. Details for VOC emission control system is provided
in Chapter 4, Section 4.4.3, Page 151.
7 Details on proposed LDAR protocol. LDAR will be carried out fortnightly basis. Details are provided in Chapter 4, Section 4.4.4, Page
152.
8 Ambient air quality should include hydrocarbon (methane and
non-methane), VOC and VCM (if applicable). Details of AAQM are provided in Chapter 3,
Section 3.7, Page 97.
9 Risk Assessment & Disaster Management Plan
Consequence analysis is given in Chapter 7, Section 7.2, Page 172.
— Identification of hazards
— Consequence Analysis
— Measures for mitigation of risk.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 46
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This chapter provides a condensed description of those aspects of the project likely to cause environmental effects.
Details are described in following sections with regards to type, need, location, size or magnitude of project
operations, technology and other related activities.
2.1 Type of Project
The proposed project is an expansion project to expand the Cumene/Phenol-Acetone plant and to put up Phenol
and Acetone derivative products like Cyclohexanone plant, Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK) plant, Iso-propyl alcohol
(IPA) and Acetophenone Plant as a part of downstream derivatives at the same location. This project activity is
covered under Category 5(f), 4(d) & 1(d) “B” projects of SEIAA, Gujarat, as per new EIA Notification vide gazette
no. S.O. 1533 dated 14th September 2006 and its amendments till date.
2.2 Need for the project
The following products will be manufactured. All these products are import substitution and will make the country
self-reliant and shall serve to save huge foreign exchange for the country.
Table 2-1: Product and importance.
S. No Product Application
1 Phenol Building Block for Phenolic, Resins, BPA, Epoxy resins, Agrochemicals, Alkyl Phenol,
Pharmaceuticals
2 Acetone Building Block for BPA, MIBK, MIBC, IPA, Pharmaceuticals
3 AMS Used as a co-monomer in polymerization process, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS)
resins, perfumes, antioxidants, drying oils and lubricating oils, For production of low molecular weight polymers
4 Cyclohexanone Consumed in production of precursors to Nylon 6,6 and Nylon 6. for production of adipic
acid, for production of Cyclohexanone Oxime
5 Methyl-isobutyl-ketone
Used as a chemical intermediate, a solvent for manufacturing paints, rubbers, pharmaceuticals, other chemicals, and industrial cleaners, used in the semiconductor
industry, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indirect food additive for adhesives, paper and paperboard, and polymers
6 Isopropyl Alcohol Used as a solvent for coatings or for industrial processes, pharmaceutical applications, used as a chemical intermediate, used as a gasoline additive, used as a cleaning fluid, A major
ingredient in "gas dryer" fuel additives, As a biological specimen preservative
7 Acetophenone Used for fragrance in soaps and perfumes, as a flavoring agent in foods, solvent for plastics
and resins, Used as a flavoring, solvent, and polymerization catalyst
2.3 Location (maps showing general location, specific location, project boundary & project site
layout)
Proposed project is located at Plot No. 12/B/1 of GIDC Dahej in District Bharuch of Gujarat State. The general
location of the proposed project in India is presented in
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 47
Figure 2-1.
Map showing the project boundary on Google image is shown as Figure 2-2, whereas the site co-ordinates are
shown in Table 2-2. Similarly the site layout map is presented as Figure 2-3 and area breakup at site is given in
Table 2-3.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 48
Figure 2-1: Site Location Map
Figure 2-2: Map Showing Project Boundary
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 49
Table 2-2: Latitude and Longitude of Project Site
Legend Latitude Longitude Legend Latitude Longitude
A 21°41'55.86"N 72°35'32.70"E K 21°41'55.61"N 72°35'39.55"E
B 21°41'56.39"N 72°35'35.22"E L 21°41'55.09"N 72°35'39.53"E
C 21°41'56.58"N 72°35'40.91"E M 21°41'55.08"N 72°35'38.83"E
D 21°41'57.18"N 72°35'44.70"E N 21°41'51.31"N 72°35'38.65"E
E 21°41'56.93"N 72°35'49.13"E O 21°41'51.31"N 72°35'37.77"E
F 21°41'41.67"N 72°35'50.85"E P 21°41'50.39"N 72°35'33.35"E
G 21°41'42.14"N 72°35'38.94"E Q 21°41'52.55"N 72°35'33.38"E
H 21°41'52.28"N 72°35'39.32"E R 21°41'52.51"N 72°35'36.14"E
I 21°41'52.12"N 72°35'41.83"E S 21°41'54.59"N 72°35'36.35"E
J 21°41'55.52"N 72°35'42.07"E T 21°41'54.80"N 72°35'32.72"E
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 50
Figure 2-3: Site Layout Map
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 51
Table 2-3: Area Break up at Site
S. No. Area After Proposed Expansion Area in m2 % of Plot Area
1 Production 27395 16.74
2
Storage
Product Storage 12145 7.42
Raw Material
Mounded Bullets 8653 5.29
Drum Storage 774 0.47
3 Boiler (including C&A handling and STG) 11325 6.92
4 Substation 1269 0.78
5 DG Room 77 0.05
6 Security Room 570 0.35
7 Office
8 Cooling Tower 1350 0.82
9 Effluent Treatment Plant 2377 1.45
10 Road & open area 32435 19.82
11 Green belt Area 50935 31.13
12 Fire water tank 2260 1.38
13 Raw Water 5367 3.28
14 Flare 180 0.11
15 Process water/ DM water 461 0.28
16 Chilled water 168 0.28
17 CCR 452 0.28
18 Engg Store / Warehouse 560 0.34
19 Coal storage 2877 1.76
20 N2 storage 300 0.18
22 Chemical Store 420 0.26
23 Other 1295 0.79
Total 163645 100.00
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 52
Figure 2-4: Pie Chart of Area Break up at Site
2.4 Approach and Connectivity to Facility
Proposed Project Site is located at GIDC- Dahej, Taluka Vagra, and District Bharuch in south Gujarat. Dahej has
now become a well-known industrial region and developing very fast, it has also a PCPIR region. Bharuch, is a
district Headquarter as well as major Town and proposed site is located at an aerial distance of 38 km towards E
direction.
By Road
SH 6 is the main approach road from Bharuch to Project site. It is six lane state highway from Bharuch up to Dahej.
Dahej Village is main center of this industrial region, at an aerial distance of about 1.87 km towards NW direction
from site. Dahej is well connected to Bharuch by State Transport Buses and Private vehicles.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 53
By Rail
Site is also approachable by railway which connected Bharuch and Dahej via Samni & Vagra. Dahej is nearest
railway station at an aerial distance of about 1.43 km in NW direction from project site. District Head Quarter
Bharuch is a Major railway station lies on Mumbai-Vadodara mainline, at an aerial distance of about of 42 km in E
direction from projects site. Bharuch is well connected with various parts of the country.
By Air
Nearest domestic airport from proposed project site is located at Vadodara, at an aerial distance of about 95 km
towards NE direction. Vadodara is well connected with Mumbai and Delhi with daily multiple flights.
Ahmedabad Airport (Domestic as well as international) is located at about 151 km towards N direction from project
site. Regular flights to all aver India and abroad are available from here.
By Water
Dahej is a port Village lying on the Bay of Cambay, having a small jetty under maritime board. There are several
other private jetties developed by industries.
2.5 Size or Magnitude of the Project
2.5.1 Magnitude of the Project
The proposed project is an expansion project to expand the Cumene/Phenol plant and to put up Phenol and
Acetone derivative products like Cyclohexanone plant, Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK) plant and Acetophenone
Plant as a part of downstream derivatives at the same location. Production capacity is given in Table 1-1.
2.5.2 Cost of the Project
The estimated cost of the project is ~ INR 400 crores.
2.6 Best Available Technologies (BAT)
Phenol Plant
Licensor: - M/s KBR
During technology selection 4 licensors were scrutinized out of which finally KBR was selected because of inherent
technology advantages from HSE point of view and almost 55% market share globally. The process inherently has
environmental control features like integrated vent scrubber system and oxidizer relief drum to care during any
abnormalities, incineration of oxidation off-gas during normal operation and efficient dephenolation and waste
water management systems. M/s KBR has developed new and improved safety systems leveraging continuous
advances in process automation and control system capabilities.
KBR phenol plant comprises of 2 main sections;
1. Front End, where cumene is oxidized to form cumene hydroperoxide (CHP) which is subsequently concentrated
and cleaved to produce phenol and acetone.
2. Back End, which employs fractionation to recover and purify phenol and acetone products as per the desired
specifications.
Cumene Plant
Licensor: - M/s UOP
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 54
M/s UOP is a globally known player in the supply of process technology, catalysts, engineered products and services
to the petroleum refining and petrochemical industries. Currently, 13 plants globally are using UOP’s Q-Max process
for producing cumene. The design incorporates improved yield, selectivity, greater reliability and latest control
systems making the process inherently safe from personnel and environment point of view.
The overall Q-Max unit consists of 3 main sections: - feed pre-treatment, reaction and fractionation. In the feed
pre-treatment section guard beds are used for removing contaminants from the propylene and benzene feed which
are detrimental to the downstream reactor catalyst. After pre-treatment benzene and propylene are reacted in an
alkylation reactor following which the reactor effluent is fractionated to recover cumene as a final product.
2.7 Manufacturing Processes with Flow Diagram and Mass Balance
2.7.1 Phenol & Acetone
Cumene is oxidized with air at high efficiency to produce Cumene hydro peroxide (CHP). CHP is then concentrated
and cleaved to phenol and acetone in the presence of an acid catalyst. Once the acid catalyst is neutralized &
decomposition completed, the decomposed mixture is fractioned to produce high-purity products phenol & acetone.
The process produces extremely high-quality phenol and acetone suitable for all applications. The fractionation train
can be designed to either separate alpha methyl styrene (AMS) as a pure co-product or hydrogenate AMS to
Cumene for recycle to oxidation. Phenol and, optionally, co-product Acetophenone (AP) are recovered from a
heavy’s stream, which is a useful fuel. The aqueous effluent is pre-treated to allow efficient bio treatment of plant
wastewater.
The plant is designed also for recovery of 0.03 MT of Alpha Methyl Styrene (AMS) per MT of Phenol.
If AMS is recovered and sold, the Cumene feed consumption will proportionately increase.
Chemical Reaction
Process Flow Diagram
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 55
Table 2-4: Material Balance for Phenol and Acetone
S.
No.
Input/MT of Product Phenol + Acetone
Raw Materials Quantity (MT)
1 Cumene 1.39
2 Oxygen (Air) 1.876
3 Hydrogen 0.00116
4 Caustic Soda (30% wt) 0.0244
5 Sulfuric Acid (as 98% H2SO4) 0.0082
6 Process Water & Steam 0.27924
7 Absorbed Nitrogen 0.001
8 Process Nitrogen 0.00916
9 N2 Purge/ Diluents 0.003
10 Column Air Leak 0.003
11 Resin 0.0001
12 Activated Carbon 0.00007
13 MSHP Catalyst 0.00001
Total (Ton) 3.60
S. No.
Output/MT of Product Phenol + Acetone
Remark Product
Liquid Effluent
Air Emission Recovery/
Product Solid
Waste
1 Phenol 1 Sale
2 Acetone 0.6090 Sale
3 Recovery column bottoms/heavies
0.0776 sale
4 Alpha Methyl Styrene (AMS) 0.0380 Sale
5 Acetone Purge 0.0008 Sale
6 Lights Hydrocarbon Purge 0.0016 Sale
7 Waste Water 0.38 Sent to ETP
8 Spent Air 1.4920 Sent to Incinerator
9 Spent Resin 0.0001 Sent to TSDF
10 Spent Carbon 0.00007 Sent to TSDF
11 Spent Catalyst 0.00001 Sent for metal
recovery
Total (Ton) 0.38 1.492 1.72703 0.00018 -
3.60
2.7.2 Cumene
Benzene is Alkylated with Propylene in the Alkylation reactor to produce Iso Propyl Benzene or Cumene.
Zeolite catalyst is used as the catalyst for the Alkylation reaction. Reaction takes place in liquid phase. Benzene and
Propylene are fed to the reactor with a molar ratio of 2:1 Excess Benzene is recycled to the reactor through
Benzene column .Di Iso Propyl Benzene (DIPB) and Tri Iso Propyl Benzene (TIPB) are also formed as side reaction
products in the reactor. These are collectively called PIPB.
DIPB is formed by the reaction of Propylene with Cumene and TIPB is formed by the reaction of Propylene with
DIPB.
Both DIPB and TIPB are converted to Cumene in the Transalkylation reactor by reaction with Benzene.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 56
Chemical Reaction
Process Flow Diagram
Table 2-5: Material Balance for Cumene
Input/MT of Product
S. No.
Raw Materials Quantity (MT)
1 Propylene 0.510
2 Benzene 0.657
3 N2 purge for vacuum system 0.0005
4 Air Leak into system 0.00016
5 Adsorbent/ Clay 0.0005
6 Catalyst 0.000007
Total (Ton) 1.17
S. No.
Output/MT of Product Cumene
Remark Product
Liquid Effluent
Air Emission
Recovery/ Product
Solid Waste
1 Cumene 1 To be used as feed for phenol plant.
2 Propane Return Stream 0.157 Sale
3 Benzene Rich Cut 0.00455 Sale
4 Poly- iso propyl
Benzene (PIPB) Drag 0.00326 Sale
5 Off gases 0.00233 Sent to Flare
6 Water 0.00092 Sent to ETP
7 Spent Adsorbent 0.0005 Sent to TSDF
8 Spent Catalyst 0.000007 Sent to TSDF
Total (Ton) 0.00092 0.00233 1.16481 0.000507 -
1.17 -
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 57
2.7.3 MIBK
Raw material: Acetone, Hydrogen
Process Description
Methyl-Isobutyl-ketone (MIBK) is produced by reacting acetone and hydrogen over a palladium doped resin catalyst
in multi-tubular trickle bed reactor. The reaction effluent consisting MIBK product, by-products and unreacted
reactants are further sent at DMK recovery section. The unconverted acetone is recycled back to reaction section
and crude MIBK stream is sent to MIBK purification section. Pure MIBK product stream is drawn off as a side
stream from the overhead section of the distillation column while heavies are obtained as bottom product. Water
phase from DMK recovery & crude MIBK section is treated in water stripping and by-product fractionation section to
strip out all hydrocarbons i.e. lights & thus obtaining a waste water stream adequate to be disposed off to battery
limit in order to be treated in a conventional waste water treatment system to match with any environmental
requirement.
Chemical Reaction
Process Flow Diagram
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 58
Table 2-6: Material Balance for MIBK
Input/MT of Product
S. No.
Raw Materials Quantity (MT)
1 Acetone 1.31
2 Hydrogen 0.025
3 Catalyst 0.00028
Total (Ton) 1.34
S. No.
Output/MT of Product MIBK
Remark Product
Liquid Effluent
Air Emission
Recovery/ Product
Solid Waste
1 MIBK 1 Sale
2 Acetone Rich stream 0.029 Sale
3 Heavies 0.0629 Send to Authorized Vendor / CHWIF
4 Gaseous Effluents
0.0037 Sent to
Flare/Incinerator
5 Water 0.242 Sent to ETP
6 Spent Catalyst 0.00028 Sent for metal recovery
Total (Ton) 0.2421 0.0037 1.0919 0.0003 -
1.34 -
2.7.4 Cyclohexanone
Raw material: Phenol, Hydrogen
Process Description
Hydrogen and phenol, preheated using reaction effluents, are sent to the phenol evaporators and then to the
hydrogenation reactors with a well-defined molar ratio. The effluent from the reactor is then cooled and sent to the
separators where the liquid phase is fed to the main distillation unit. The gas phase, less the vents necessary to
eliminate inert introduced with fresh hydrogen, is recycled to reactors. The lights removal column is fed with
effluents from reaction section. Light products and water is removed from top and bottom stream consisting
cyclohexanone, cyclohexanol, phenol and heavies is sent to cyclohexanone column. Pure cyclohexanone from top is
stored in storage tank while bottom stream consisting cyclohexanol, phenol and heavies with some cyclohexanone
is sent to cyclohexanol column. The top stream consisting of cyclohexanol with some cyclohexanone is recycled to
cyclohexanone column. The pure cyclohexanol is taken out as side stream and is stored in the storage tank. The
phenol recovery column is fed with bottom stream of cyclohexanol column. Top product of phenol recovery column
i.e. phenol with some cyclohexanol is recycled to hydrogenation unit. Bottom stream i.e. heavies
Chemical Reaction
Main Reaction
(Phenol)
(Cyclohexanone)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 59
Side Reaction
Process Flow Diagram
Table 2-7: Material Balance for Cyclohexanone
Input/MT of Product
S. No. Raw Materials Quantity (MT)
1 Phenol 1.055
2 Hydrogen 0.05099
3 Catalyst 0.000074
Total (Ton) 1.1
S. No.
Output/MT of Product Cyclohexanone
Remark Product
Liquid Effluent
Air Emission
Recovery/ Product
Solid Waste
1 Cyclohexanone 1 Sale
2 Cyclohexanol 0.035 Sale
3 Heavies 0.024 Sale
4 Gaseous Effluents 0.0090 Sent to
Incinerator/Flare/Scrubber
5 Water 0.0712 Sent to ETP
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 60
6 Spent Catalyst 0.000074 Sent for metal recovery
Total (Ton) 0.0712 0.0090 1.059 0.000074 -
1.1 -
2.7.5 Isopropyl Alcohol
Raw material: Acetone, Hydrogen
Process Description
The hydrogenation reactor operates in mixed phase, in trickle bed flow regime, and is operated at a moderately
high pressure. Higher pressures aid the hydrogenation reaction by increasing hydrogen solubility in acetone.
Acetone feedstock is mixed with the effluent recirculation. Hydrogen feedstock is compressed to the required
pressure using a two-stage reciprocating compressor. The combined reactor feed is heated against the effluent and
fed to the top of the reactor. A cooling water cooler helps remove the heat of reaction from the effluent, which is
then directed to a vapor/liquid separator where unreacted hydrogen is recovered for recycle back to the reactor. An
IPA Column recovers commercial grade IPA from the hydrogenation reactor effluent, removing impurities such as
water, acetone, methanol etc. Hydrogenation reactor effluent flows to the IPA column. Wet IPA purge is removed
as distillate under reflux drum level control, and is routed to battery limits. IPA product is recovered as bottoms
liquid and it is cooled in a cooling water exchanger prior to being routed to battery limits.
Chemical Reaction
Process Flow Diagram
Table 2-8: Material Balance for Isopropyl Alcohol
Input/MT of Product
S. No. Raw Materials Quantity (MT)
1 Acetone 0.9863
2 Catalyst 0.00012
3 Hydrogen 0.0348
Total (Ton) 1.02
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 61
S. No.
Output/MT of Product Isopropyl Alcohol
Remark Product
Liquid Effluent
Air Emission
Recovery/ Product
Solid Waste
1 Isopropyl Alcohol 1 Sale
2 Wet IPA 0.0208 Sale
3 IPA vapor vent 0.00373 Sent to Flare
4 Spent Catalyst
0.00012 Sent for metal recovery/
TSDF
Total (Ton) 0 0.00373 1.0208 0.00012 -
1.02 -
2.7.6 Acetophenone
Raw material: Recovery column bottoms/heavies, Sulfuric acid
Process Description
Acetophenone (AP) is produced as a by-product in the oxidation and cleavage reactions of the phenol process. The
salts and sodium phenates is removed by washing with acid and steam condensate in a wash drum. The aqueous
phase from wash drum is purged to dephenolation feed tank in the phenol plant. The washed heavies product is
sent to distillation. In the AP heavies removal column, heavies are removed from bottom as a purge and
hydrocarbon exits as an overhead product. Water obtained from the wash system is removed from reflux drum
boot and from vent condenser to a drain. The distillate from AP heavies removal column is further treated under
atmospheric pressure in the AP Light Stripping Column to remove phenol and other light components. This light
stream is sent to light storage tank in the phenol plant. The bottom product is sent to the next column for further
treatment. Dimethyl Benzyl Alcohol (DMBA) in the stream is close boiling to AP and thus is difficult to be
fractionated from AP. Therefore, it is removed in an AP Purification Reactor using acidic type catalyst. This reactor
takes feed from a total trap-out tray from AP Light Stripping Column and returns the product to the tray below.
Lights, water, and heavies are formed from the reaction. Water is removed from the boot of reflux drum. The
bottom stream of AP Lights removal column, containing approximately 90% of AP, is further purified in the AP
product column. AP product is withdrawn as a side draw from a tray near top of the column. Bottom stream
containing azeotrope of phenol/AP is recycled back to AP Heavies Removal Column for recovery of AP
Process Flow Diagram
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 62
Table 2-9: Material Balance for Acetophenone
Input/MT of Product
S. No. Raw Materials Quantity (MT)
1 Recovery column bottoms/heavies 5.7
2 Sulfuric acid (98 %wt ) 0.1
3 Catalyst 0.00085
4 Steam condensate 0.8
Total (Ton) 6.60
S. No.
Output/MT of Product Acetophenone
Remark Product
Liquid Effluent
Air Emission Recovery/
Product Solid Waste
1 Acetophenone 1 sale
2 Heavies from Acetophenone
process 3.9
Send to Authorized Vendor / CHWIF
3 Lights from Acetophenone
process 0.8
4 Aqueous purge 0.9 Sent to ETP
5 Spent Catalyst 0.00085 Sent to TSDF
Total (Ton) 0.9 0 5.7 0.00085 -
6.60 -
2.8 End use of Products
End use of the proposed products are listed as below;
Table 2-10: End use of the Products
S. No Product Application
1 Phenol Building Block for Phenolic, Resins, BPA, Epoxy resins, Agrochemicals, Alkyl Phenol,
Pharmaceuticals
2 Acetone Building Block for BPA, MIBK, MIBC, IPA, Pharmaceuticals
3 AMS Used as a co-monomer in polymerization process, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS)
resins, perfumes, antioxidants, drying oils and lubricating oils, For production of low molecular weight polymers
4 Cyclohexanone Consumed in production of precursors to Nylon 6,6 and Nylon 6. for production of adipic
acid, for production of Cyclohexanone Oxime
5 Methyl-isobutyl-ketone
Used as a chemical intermediate, a solvent for manufacturing paints, rubbers, pharmaceuticals, other chemicals, and industrial cleaners, used in the semiconductor
industry, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indirect food additive for adhesives, paper and paperboard, and polymers
6 Isopropyl Alcohol Used as a solvent for coatings or for industrial processes, pharmaceutical applications, used as a chemical intermediate, used as a gasoline additive, used as a cleaning fluid, A major
ingredient in "gas dryer" fuel additives, As a biological specimen preservative
7 Acetophenone Used for fragrance in soaps and perfumes, as a flavoring agent in foods, solvent for plastics
and resins, Used as a flavoring, solvent, and polymerization catalyst
2.9 Cleaner Production Technology
Vent Chillers and activated carbon bed adsorber system is employed as a part of the process to recover
most of the VOC’s and improve yield of the process.
Use of advanced zeolite based catalysts to improve the yield in Cumene process and overall utility
consumption.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 63
Use of self-cleaning type side stream filters which reduces the water consumption for backwashing.
Heat integration is employed wherever possible in the process to reduce the steam consumption.
No open draining of process chemicals
No vending of process chemicals in open
Benzene tanks- Internal floating roof with double seal
Hazardous chemicals pumps with double mechanical seals
Hydrocarbon and toxic gas detectors are provided at strategic locations
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 64
2.10 Properties of Raw Materials
The properties of raw materials are given in Table 2-11.
Table 2-11: Properties of Raw Material
S. No.
Raw Materials/ Products
CAS No. Formula State Odour Mol. Wt. (g/mole)
Flash Point
(˚C)
Melting Point
(˚C)
Boiling Point
(˚C)
IDLH (ppm)
Stability Hazard Color Sp. Gr (g/cc)
UEL %
LEL %
Odour Thresold (ppm)
Raw Material
1 Benzene 71-43-2 C6H6 Liquid aromatic 78.1 -11.11 5.56 80 500 Stable Flammable Colorless to light-yellow
0.88 7.8 1.2 4.68
2 Caustic soda Lye 1310-73-2 NaOH Solid Odourless 40 NA 12 1390 2.5 Stable Non
combustible Colorless to
white 2.13 NA NA NA
3 Hexa-methylenamine
(Dytek or HMDA 100-97-0 C6H12N4 Solid Odourless 140.19 250 260 Sublimes Stable Combustible Coloureless 1.35 NA
4 Propylene 115-07-1 CH2CHCH3 Gas aromatic 42.081 -162 -185 -48 2000 Stable Flammable Colorless 0.5 9.5 2.1 39.6-116.27 mg/m3
5 Sulphuric acid (98%) 7664-93-9 H2SO4 Liquid Odourless 98.1 NA 10.31 290 15
mg/m3 Stable
Non-Combustible
Colorless to dark-brown
1.84 NA NA 1.0 mg/m3
6 HCl (30 %) 7647-01-0 HCL Liquid Strong Tarry 36.458 100 -114.22 -85.1 50 Pale Yellow
Products
1 Cumene 98-82-8 C6H5CH(CH3)2 Liquid Characteristic 120.195 31 -96 152 900 Volatile Flammable Colourless 0.86 6.5 0.9 0.012
2 Acetone 67-64-1 CH3-CO-CH3 Liquid Characteristic 58.08 -16.99 -95 56 2500 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.78 12.8 2.6 20
3 Alpha Methyl Styrene
(AMS) 98-83-9 C9H10 Liquid Characteristic 118.179 45 -23 164 700 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.91 6.1 1.9 5.20 X 10-2
4 Light Hydrocarbon Purge
5 Acetone Purge 67-64-1 CH3-CO-CH3 Liquid Characteristic 58.08 -16.99 -95 56 2500 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.78 12.8 2.6 20
6 Poly- iso propyl Benzene
(PIPB) Drag
7 Phenol 108-95-2 C6H5OH Liquid Characteristic 94.113 79 40.9 182 250
Prone to redden on exposure to air and light, hastened by
presence of alkalinity.
Flammable Colourless 1.06 8.6 1.8 0.006-0.024
8 Recovery Column Bottoms / Heavies
9 Propane return stream 115-07-1 CH3CH2CH3 Liquid Characteristic 44.097 -104 -189.7 -42 2100 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.5 9.5 2.5 5,000-20,000
10 Benzene Rich Cut 71-43-2 C6H6 Liquid aromatic
odour 78.1 -11.11 5.56 80 500 Stable Flammable
Colourless to light-yellow
0.88 7.8 1.2 4.68
11
Hydrogenation Products
Cyclohexanone 108-94-1 C6H10O Liquid Characteristic 98.145 44 -31 156 700 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.95 8.1 1.2 0.88
Cyxlohexanol 108-93-0 C6H11OH Liquid Characteristic 100.161 68 25.4 161 400 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.96 NA NA 0.07
Methyl Iso-butyl Ketone 108-10-1 C6H12O Liquid Characteristic 100.161 14 -84 116.5 500 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.8 7.5 1.4 0.1
Isopropyl Alcohol 67-63-0 C3H8O Liquid Pleasant 60.096 11.7 -90 83 2000 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.79 12 2 20-40
Cyclohexanol Rich Stream
108-93-0 C6H11OH Liquid Characteristic 100.161 68 25.4 161 400 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.96 NA NA 0.07
Acetophenone 98-86-2 C8H8O Liquid Characteristic 120.151 77 20 203 ND Stable Flammable Colourless 1.03 6.7 1.1 65
Acetone Rich Stream 67-64-1 CH3-CO-CH3 Liquid Characteristic 58.08 -16.99 -95 56 2500 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.78 12.8 2.6 20
Wet IPA 67-63-0 C3H8O Liquid Pleasant 60.096 11.7 -90 83 2000 Stable Flammable Colourless 0.79 12 2 20-40
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 65
2.11 Storage Details of Raw Materials & Products
Information about the means of storage of raw materials and products are provided in Table 2-12 & Table 2-13 respectively.
Table 2-12: Details of Storage of Raw Materials
S. No. Raw Materials / Product State Consumption, MTPM Mode of Storage Capacity of each
storage in m3 No. of Tanks/Bullets Total Capacity (m3)
Storage Condition
Temp, °C Press, atm
As per EC received
1 Propylene Liquid 7916 Mounded Bullet 2100 4 8400 Atm. 18-22
2 Benzene Liquid 14666 Tank 2800 2 5600 Atm. Ambient
3 Caustic soda Lye Liquid 165 Tank 43 1 43 Atm. Ambient
4 Sulphuric acid 98% Liquid 206 Tank 34 1 34 Atm. Ambient
5 Hexa-methylenamine (Dytek or HMDA) Liquid 16 Tank 6 1 6 Atm. Ambient
6 Cumene Liquid 1316 Tank 50 3 150 Atm. Ambient
Amendment Required for
1 Propylene Liquid 14188 Mounded Bullet 4293 2 8586 Ambient 18-22
2 Benzene Liquid 18274 Tank 3418 2 6836 Ambient Atm.
3 Caustic soda Lye Liquid 347 Tank 127 1 127 Ambient Atm.
4 Sulphuric acid 98% Liquid 175 Tank 53 1 53 Ambient Atm.
5 HCl (30 wt%) Liquid 39 Tank 22 1 22 Ambient Atm.
6 Hydrogen (Through pipeline Gaseous 578 Cylinder battery 0.270 MT 1 0.270 MT Ambient 100 bar
Table 2-13: Details of Storage of Products
S. No. Chemicals State Consumption (MT/Month) Hazard Involved Means of Storage Operating Condition (Storage) Capacity of Vessel
in m3 No. of Vessels
Storage Capacity (m3) Press Kg/Cm2 Temp ºC
As per EC received
1 Cumene Liquid 23000 Flammable Atm. storage tank Ambient Atm. 6872 3 20616
2 Phenol Liquid 16666 Toxic Atm. storage tank Ambient 50 5409 2 10818
3 Acetone Liquid 10000 Flammable Atm. storage tank Ambient Atm. 4523 2 9046
Amendment Required
1 Cumene Liquid 27807 Flammable Tank Atm. Ambient 6927 1 6927
2 Phenol Liquid 21390 Toxic Tank Ambient 55 4276 2 8552
3 Acetone Liquid 12834 Flammable Tank Atm. Ambient 3079 2 6158
4 Propane return stream Liquid 4367 Flammable Mounded Bullet 13.6 Ambient 2875 1 2875
5 Alpha Methyl Styrene (AMS) Liquid 813 Flammable Tank Atm. Ambient 225 1 225
6 Benzene Rich Cut Liquid 127 Flammable Vessel Atm. Ambient 40 1 40
7 Recovery Column Bottoms /
Heavies Liquid 2158 Flammable Tank Atm. 95 456 1 456
8 Light Hydrocarbon Purge Liquid 35 Flammable Vessel Atm. 50 12 1 12
9 Acetone Purge Liquid 17 Flammable Vessel Atm. 5.4 6.2 1 6.2
10 Poly- iso propyl Benzene (PIPB)
Drag Liquid 88 Flammable Tank Atm. Ambient 26 1 26
11
Hydrogenation Products
Cyclohexanone Liquid 10695 Flammable Tank Ambient Atm. 992 2 1984
Cyxlohexanol Liquid 374 Flammable Tank Ambient Atm. 319 2 638
Methyl Iso-butyl Ketone Liquid 3209 Flammable Tank Ambient Atm. 518 2 1035
Isopropyl Alcohol Liquid 3209 Flammable Tank Ambient Atm. 518 2 1035
12 Cyclohexanol Rich Stream Liquid 257 Flammable Tank Ambient Atm. 83 1 83
13 Acetophenone Liquid 353 Flammable Tank Ambient Atm. 114 1 114
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 66
S. No. Chemicals State Consumption (MT/Month) Hazard Involved Means of Storage Operating Condition (Storage) Capacity of Vessel
in m3 No. of Vessels
Storage Capacity (m3) Press Kg/Cm2 Temp ºC
14 Acetone Rich Stream Liquid 289 Flammable Tank Ambient Atm. 93 1 93
15 Wet IPA Liquid 250 Flammable Tank Ambient Atm. 81 1 81
2.12 Transportation Details
Transportation details of raw materials are given in Table 2-14.
Table 2-14: Transportation Details of Raw Materials
Raw Material Consumption(MTPM) Source Mode of Transport
As per EC received
Propylene 7916 Indigenous Sea/Pipeline/Road
Benzene 14666 Indigenous Sea/Pipeline/Road
Caustic soda Lye 165 Indigenous Road
Sulphuric acid 98% 206 Indigenous Road
Hexamethylenamine (Dytek or HMDA) 16 Indigenous Road
Cumene 1316 Captive/ Export/ Domestic Sea/Pipeline/Road
Amendment Required for
Propylene 14188 Refineries Road tanker / Pipe line/ Sea
Benzene 18274 Refineries Road tanker / Pipe line/ Sea
Cumene 27807 Captive/ Export/ Domestic Sea/Pipeline/Road
Caustic soda Lye 347 Manufacturer Road tanker
Sulphuric acid 98% 175 Manufacturer Road tanker
HCl (30 wt%) 39 Manufacturer Road tanker
Hydrogen 578 Neighboring industry Pipeline
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 67
2.13 Infrastructure Facility
2.13.1 Power
DPL has applied for 19 MW (20 MVA) power connection to Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (DGVCL). A captive
power plant of 42 MW (Existing) is also there. Existing 1 DG Set of Capacity of 1500 kVA is used as a backup in
emergency. Another 1 DG Set of Capacity of 1500 kVA is proposed in amendment.
2.13.2 Water Supply
For the proposed expansion, main source of water is available from GIDC Dahej. Existing water requirement is 2048
KLD (Environment Clearance received) which will be increased up to 8481 KLD after proposed expansion. Out of
8481 KLD, fresh water used will be 7099 KLD and 1382 KLD will be recycled water. Source of water for proposed
amendment will be GIDC water supply. The permission letter is given in Figure 2-6.
2.13.3 Effluent Disposal Facility
Existing wastewater generation as per Environment Clearance received is 949 KLD. Additional wastewater
generation will be 1417 KLD which will be recycled. So after amendment total wastewater generation will be 2366
KLD out of which 1417 KLD will be recycled and 949 KLD will be discharged to GIDC drain for final disposal.
2.13.4 Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility
Due to proposed amendment hazardous waste generation will increase. Hazardous waste generated will be
disposed in nearby Waste Management landfill facility. The unit has membership of M/s. Saurastra Enviro Projects
Pvt. Ltd. (SEPPL) for Integrated Common Hazardous Waste Management Facility.
2.14 Water Consumption and Wastewater Generation for Proposed Expansion
In the proposed paint manufacturing unit, the water will be mainly used for following areas:
Process & Washings
Utilities
Domestic Usage
Gardening and fire fighting
Existing water requirement is 2048 KLD (Environment Clearance received) which will be increased up to 8481 KLD
after proposed expansion. Out of 8481 KLD, 7099 KLD fresh water will be used and 1382 KLD will be recycled water
from RO & UF. Source of water for proposed amendment will be GIDC water supply.
Existing wastewater generation as per Environment Clearance received is 949 KLD. Additional wastewater
generation will be 1417 KLD which will be recycled. So after expansion total wastewater generation will be 2366
KLD out of which 1417 KLD will be recycled and 949 KLD will be discharged to GIDC drain for final disposal.
Domestic wastewater of 50 KLD will be treated separately in STP and treated sewage will be used for on land
irrigation (gardening).
The breakup of water consumption and wastewater generation from the proposed unit is described in Table 2-15
and Table 2-16 the water balance diagram is presented in Figure 2-5.
.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 68
Table 2-15: Details of Water Consumption
S. No.
Description Water Consumption in KLD
Existing Proposed Total
1 Raw water to DM Plant 677 485 1162
a Process 177 103 280
b Boiler 500 230 730
2 Cooling & Chilling 1299 5979 7278
3 Washing 35 -25 10
4 Domestic 12 0 12
5 Gardening 25 -6 19
6 Total Gross 2048 6433 8481
7 Recycle water from RO 0 1382 1382
8 Total Fresh water
Consumption 2048 5051 7099
Table 2-16: Details of Wastewater Generation
S. No.
Description Waste water generation in KLD
Remarks Existing Proposed Total
1 Process 405 172 577 To ETP
2 Boiler 144 0 111 35 KLD Not accounted as it shall
be used internally for dust suppression and 111 KLD to ETP.
3 CPU Regeneration 0 139 139 To ETP
4 Backwash from Raw
Water Treatment Plant 0 324 324 To ETP
5 DM Regeneration & 0 152 102
50 KLD UF back wash Not accounted as it shall be used for cooling Tower Make up and 102
KLD to ETP
6 Cooling & Chilling 354 654 1008
To ETP 7 Washing 35 -25 10
8 Domestic 10 0 10
9 Total Wastewater
Generation 948 1417 2366
85 KLD directly Recycle and rest 2281 KLD to ETP
10 Recycle water from RO, UF & Boiler blow down
0 1417
(1332 + 50 + 35)
11 Final discharge to
GIDC drain 948 0 949 Discharge to GIDC Drain
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 69
Figure 2-5: Water Balance Diagram – After Proposed Expansion
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 70
Figure 2-6: GIDC Permission for Water Supply, Power Supply and Drainage
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 71
2.14.1 Wastewater Disposal
After proposed expansion 949 KLD will be discharged to GIDC drain for final disposal.
2.14.2 Wastewater Treatment Scheme
The Effluent Treatment Unit is basically a bio-treatment system consisting of an equalization tank, aeration basins
and clarifiers to reduce the BOD, COD and the phenol contents to the acceptable levels before discharging it to
common GIDC facility.
Also, a recycle system post ETP is considered to meet the discharge limit requirements and to optimize the fresh
water intake.
Since the process effluents have a high COD/BOD ratio, provision of dilution with cooling tower blow-down or
DM/CPU regeneration waste is there for meeting the bio-treatability requirements.
Quality of Wastewater Generated from Manufacturing Process & Utilities
The wastewater generated from the manufacturing process and other utility areas are described below.
Table 2-17: Stream Wise Quality of Wastewater Generated from Entire Plant
S. No. Name of plant Phenol Plant Cumene Plant Hydrogenated Phenol Plant
1 pH 5.0 5.5 5.5
2 COD (mg/l) 11754 4000 1000
3 BOD (mg/l) 4352 - -
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 72
S. No. Name of plant Phenol Plant Cumene Plant Hydrogenated Phenol Plant
4 TDS (mg/l) 33194 - -
5 Phenol (mg/l) 40 - -
Design Inlet & outlet Characteristics of ETP
The design base inlet and outlet characteristics of the wastewater are presented in below table.
Table 2-18: Design Inlet & Outlet Characteristics of Proposed ETP
S. No. Parameters Unit ETP Inlet ETP Outlet
1 pH pH unit 5.5 6.5-8.0
2 BOD mg/l 1421 100
3 COD mg/l 3929 250
4 TSS mg/l 101 100
5 TDS mg/l 11709 -
6 Phenol mg/l 13 5
Wastewater Treatment Units with Capacity
The list of ETP units with sizing is given in below table.
Table 2-19: List of ETP Units with Sizing
S. No. Unit No. Name of the Unit No.
Inside size (m) x SWD (m)/
Inside size (m) x Height (m)
Dimensions (L x B x H)
(m x m x m) Total Capacity (m3)
1 T-02 Reaction Tank - 1 1 - 2.75 x 2.75 x 2.0 15
2 N-01 Primary Clarifier 1 4 x 3 - 113
3 T-03/04 Equalization Tank 2 - 9.2 x 8.7 x 5.0 800
4 T-01 Collection Tank - 1 with Oil Trap 1 - 2.0 x 1.9 x 2.5 10
5 T-05 Extended Aeration Tank - 1 1 - 25.9 x 18.0 x 6.0 2830
6 N-02 Secondary Clarifier - 1 1 11 x 3.5 - 332
7 T-06 Extended Aeration Tank - 2 1 - 18.0 x 8.2 x 6.0 890
8 N-03 Secondary Clarifier - 2 1 11 x 3.5 - 332
9 T-07 Collection Tank - 2 1 - 5.8 x 3.0 x 3.5 33
10 N-04 Lamella Clarifier 1 - - 331
11 T-08 SMFT 1 - - 32
12 T-09 Clarified Water Tank 1 - 9.7 x 3.3 x 3.5 113
13 F-01 A/B Multi Grade Filter 2 2.6 x 1.875 - 20
14 F-02 A/B Activated Carbon Filter 2 2.8 x 2.5 - 31
15 T-10 Filtered Water Tank 1 3.2 x 3.0 - 24
16 T-11 Guard Pond + RO Reject Tank 1 - 13 x 3.0 x 4.0 156
17 T-12 UF Feed Tank 1 - 6.0 x 5.0 x 3.8 114
18 T-13 RO Feed Tank 1 - 6.5 x 5.0 x 2.5 85
19 T-15 RO Permeate Tank 1 - 9.0 x 9.0 x 3.0 243
20 T-16 Sludge Sump 1 - 3.0 x 1.5 x 4.5 10
21 T-17 Sludge Drying Bed - 1 1 - 13 x 6.5 x 1.0 85
22 T-18 Sludge Drying Bed - 2 1 - 13 x 6.5 x 1.0 85
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 73
Process Description of ETP
Effluent generated from the industrial use will be treated in proposed ETP followed by RO. Stage wise process
description is given as below.
Primary Treatment
The process effluent is led to the reaction tank where lime dosing is done to increase the pH from 5.5 to 7-8.
Addition of lime results in the formation of sludge which is removed in the primary clarifier. The sludge formed due
to lime is settled at the bottom of the primary clarifier which will be separated and pumped to the sludge sump.
The clarified effluent flows to the equalization tank.
The oil bearing streams from the plant will be pumped to the Oil Trap Tank to separate the free oil following which
it is mixed with other streams in the equalization tank.
Two Equalization Tanks are provided which operate on a fill and draw principle. Part flow of the cooling tower blow-
down or DM-CPU regeneration waste is directed to the Equalization Tank to dilute the process effluent for reducing
the TDS to ~ 12000 ppm for the sake of bio-treatability.
Secondary Treatment
The Equalized effluent is transferred to Extended Aeration Tanks system for biological treatment where the organic
matter is degraded aerobically by the microbes. It’s a two stage Extended Aeration Process working in series. The
equalized effluent is introduced into the Extended Aeration Tank-1 where aerobic bacterial culture is maintained in
suspension in the form of bio-sludge. The reactor contents are referred to as mixed liquor. In the reactor the
bacterial culture carries out the conversion as:
COHNS + O2 + NUTRIENTS CO2 + NH3 + C5H7NO2 + Degraded Colour
C5H7NO2 + 5O2 5CO2 + 2H2O + NH3 + energy
Diffused aeration system is used for providing the desired oxygen to microbes which also serves to maintain the
reactor contents in a completely mixed regime & Dissolve Oxygen (DO) level of 2 ppm. At the end of the aeration
period the wastewater biological mass mixture (mixed liquor) reaches the effluent end of the chamber and flows in
a trough to the Secondary Clarifier-1 for the separation of sludge and liquid. In order to ensure required population
of bacteria in extended aeration System, i.e., Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) and also Food to Micro-
organisms ratio (F/M), part of the settled sludge from the Secondary Clarifier-1 is re-circulated back to Extended
Aeration tank-1 while the liquid effluent overflows over weir into Extended Aeration System II.
Here, further reduction in BOD takes place as per the mechanism described above.
A part of the separated solids is returned to the Extended Aeration tank-II as return sludge while the liquid
overflows over weir into Collection Tank-II where other streams like cooling tower blow-down and DM-CPU
regeneration waste are mixed with it.
Tertiary Treatment
The Mixed Liquor from Collection Tank II enters the Lamella Clarifier for separation of sludge and liquid via SMFT
(Static Mixer and Flocculation Tank). Flocculant and Coagulant is added in SMFT. The main purpose of this tank is
to mix the FeCl3 and Polymer with the effluent so that flocs will be formed in Lamella Clarifier which will help in
settling suspended solids. The clarified water from the lamella clarifier is taken to the clarified water tank which also
acts as a chlorine contact tank. Here hypochlorite dosing is done to further reduce the BOD for preventing bio-
fouling in downstream filters.
The effluent from clarified water tank is pumped into Multi Grade filter (MGF) for the reduction of suspended solids
& turbidity before taking the effluent to downstream membrane systems. This unit works on the phenomenon of
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 74
surface filtration. At a pre-determined pressure drop the backwash of filter is initiated to clean the filter bed.
Backwash cycle can also be manually initiated.
The effluent from Multi Grade filter is the fed to Activated Carbon filter (ACF) to ensure reduction in excess chlorine,
colour, residual recalcitrant & organics. Activated carbon is a porous material, mainly consisting of elementary
carbon in a graphite-like structure. The internal surface area typically amounts to 500 up to 1500 m2/g.
Treated water from ACF will be collected in filtered water tank which will act as collection tank, from where one
stream will go to Guard Pond + RO Reject Tank and the other stream will go to for processing in the UF-RO
system.
Ultra Filtration system: Ultra-filtration is a low pressure membrane process for the removal of colloidal silica and
colloidal particles (measured in terms of Silt Density Index). The feed water flows from the inside of the fibres,
permeates through the membrane and is removed as the product from the shell side.
In Ultra-filtration, small molecules such as water, monosaccharide, simple alcohol and all ionic species pass through
the membrane while larger molecules, colloidal particulate matter and bacteria are retained.
Ultra-filtration is the best pre-treatment technique for cost effective performance of the Reverse Osmosis System as
it leads to increased RO membranes life and reduced cleaning frequency. This ultimately reduces the operating
expenditure incurred on the RO system.
2.14.3 Ultra-Filtration System
Ultrafiltration is a pressure driven unit operation often employed upstream of the RO system to increase the RO
membrane life and reduce the cleaning frequency of the same thereby reducing the operating costs for RO system.
UF will remove suspended solids, colloids and macromolecules from liquid streams by using a porous semi-
permeable membrane. The treated water from the UF will be collected in the RO feed tank and will be pumped to
the RO unit for further treatment as well as used for cleaning the UF system.
Technical features:
Description Value
No. of skids 2
Recovery 86%
Feed flow rate 48.5 m3/hr
No. of membranes 12 in each skid
Skid dimensions L = 3815 mm
W = 1276 mm
The treated water from Ultra-filtration system will be collected in the RO feed tank for temporary storage & the
treated water will be transferred to Reverse Osmosis System through pump for further treatment as well as will be
used during cleaning of Ultra-filtration system.
2.14.4 Reverse Osmosis System
The treated water from the RO feed tank is subjected to sodium Bi-sulphite (SBS) and Antiscalant dosing prior to
feeding in the cartridge filter. The Antiscalant Dosing System is provided to prevent precipitation of sparingly
soluble salts and hence to inhibit scale formation on RO membranes.
The SBS (sodium bisulphite) Dosing System is provided to remove traces of chlorine present in raw water to protect
the membranes. Also provision of shock dosing of SBS is made in case of any excess free chlorine coming in to safe
guard RO membranes. The RO unit comprises of cartridge filters & high pressure pump.
Technical Details
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 75
Effluent stream from UF system will be stored temporarily in RO feed tank from where it will be pumped to RO
system for further reduction of dissolved solids. The RO system comprises of cartridge filters and high pressure
pumps. Prior to cartridge filters Sodium- metabisulfite (SMBS) and antiscalant will be dosed for efficient operation of
the RO unit. SMBS dosing removes traces of chlorine in the feed water to protect the membranes while antiscalant
serves to inhibit the scale formation on the membranes. The cartridge filters will reduce the suspended solids
further to a level acceptable to the downstream RO membranes. From the cartridge filters effluent will be fed to the
RO skid comprising of 2 trains. Permeate from the RO unit will be stored in the RO permeate tank while the reject
will be stored in the RO reject tank.
Cartridge Filters are used to further reduce suspended solids to a level acceptable to the downstream
Reverse Osmosis Membranes
High pressure pumps are used to feed the Reverse Osmosis skid which is an integrated assembly of high-strength
thermally cured fibre glass reinforced epoxy pressure tubes housing the RO membrane elements, feed, product and
concentrate piping, all mounted on a high-strength steel structure. The skid comprises of two trains having a total
of 108 modules. The operation of each RO train shall be semi-automatic with a provision for membrane cleaning by
chemical re-circulation if the pressure drop across the system exceeds a pre-set value.
The RO is designed for 70% recovery and will be PLC operated. The RO reject is sent to the Guard Pond + RO
Reject Tank from where it will be pumped to GIDC common treatment facility. The RO permeate or the recovered
water will be recycled back for internal usage.
Technical features
Description Value
No. of trains 2
Recovery 74%
Feed flow rate 75 m3/hr
No. of RO tubes 9 in each train, Total 18
No. of membranes 54 in each train, Total 108
Skid dimensions L = 4156 mm
W = 1800 mm
Sludge Treatment
Sludge from Lamella Clarifier, primary clarifier, Secondary Clarifier I and II shall be collected in sludge sump and
pumped to Filter Press for further treatment. The filtrate from the Filter Press is sent back the Equalization Tank
while the sludge cake formed will be disposed of as landfill. Additionally sludge drying beds are provided for drying
the sludge cake formed from the Filter Press.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 76
Figure 2-7: Process Block diagram of ETP
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 77
2.14.5 Adequacy of proposed ETP
The adequacy of the proposed Effluent Treatment Units is presented in below table.
Table 2-20: Adequacy of ETP
S. No ETP Treatment Units No of Unit Volume (m3) Total Volume (m3) Flow (m3/day) Retention time (hrs) Retention time (day)
1 Reaction Tank - 1 1 15 15 577 - -
2 Primary Clarifier 1 113 113 577 4.7 -
3 Equalization Tank 2 800 1600 1633 23.5 -
4 Collection Tank - 1 with Oil Trap 1 10 10 - - -
5 Extended Aeration Tank - 1 1 2830 2830 1633 - 1.7
6 Secondary Clarifier - 1 1 332 332 1633 4.9 -
7 Extended Aeration Tank - 2 1 890 890 1633 13.1 -
8 Secondary Clarifier - 2 1 332 332 1633 4.9 -
9 Collection Tank - 2 1 33 33 564 1.4 -
10 Lamella Clarifier 1 331 331 564 14.1 -
11 SMFT 1 32 32 - - -
12 Clarified Water Tank 1 113 113 2197 1.2 -
13 Multi Grade Filter 2 20 40 2197 - -
14 Activated Carbon Filter 2 31 62 2197 - -
15 Filtered Water Tank 1 24 24 2197 0.3 -
16 Guard Pond + RO Reject Tank 1 156 156 949 3.9 -
17 UF Feed Tank 1 114 114 - - -
18 RO Feed Tank 1 85 85 - - -
19 RO Permeate Tank 1 243 243 - - -
20 Sludge Sump 1 10 10 - - -
21 Sludge Drying Bed - 1 1 85 85 - - -
22 Sludge Drying Bed - 2 1 85 85 - - -
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 78
2.14.6 Water Conservation Measures
Adequate measures are taken to reduce fresh water demand by following measures;
Use of treated water by installing recycling RO which will reduce the fresh water demand.
Explore the possibility condensate recovery from the boiler.
Use of equipment washing water for further cleaning.
Use of high pressure wash systems, reducing wash waters.
Use of drip irrigation system for gardening to conserve water.
Table 2-21: Details of Water Saving
S. No.
Area of water Usage
Initial estimation
of Total Water
demand in ToR (KLD)
Action taken for water
conservation
Total Reduction in
water demand (KLD)
Total Water demand after efforts made
for water conservation
(KLD)
Remarks
1 Raw Water Make up in DM Plant
1724 Condensate
recovery from the boiler
562 (32%) 1162
Condensate recovery will be taken at
maximum extent upto 90 % and same will be
reused for steam generation. So make up demand for DM plant will Reduced.
2 Cooling Tower 7278
Reuse of treated water from RO & UF
for cooling tower make up
323 (5%) 6955
Total water demand will be reduced by
recycling and reuse of treated water from RO
& UF
3 Domestic 12 - 0 12 -
4 Gardening 25 Drip irrigation technology
7 (28%) 18 Drip irrigation system
will be proposed
5 Washing area 35
Optimum use of water,
Recycling of washing water
25 (71%) 10
Washing wastewater will be again reused for
drum, vessel and reactor cleaning to reduce fresh water
demand
7 Water Make up in
Raw Water Treatment plant
0 - 0 324 -
8 Total Water
Consumption 9074 - 8481 -
9 Recycled water from RO & UF
1260 Increase the
Recovery 122 (2%) 1382 -
10 Net water Demand
7814 - 1039 7099 Total saving water will be 9% of initial
water demand
2.14.7 Management Plan for effluent generated from spillage, leakages, vessel washing etc.
Underground trenches are provided periphery of every plant as well as total plot, whatever the waste water
generated from spillage, leakage, equipment washing etc. will be disposed into trenches and all these trenches are
connected by a collection pit and then waste water is to be treated in proposed ETP with other streams.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 79
2.15 Fuel Consumption
Details of fuel consumption are given in Table 2-22.
Table 2-22: Details of Fuel Consumption
S. No.
Stack Attached to
Capacity Stack Nos.
Stack Height
Type of Fuel used
Fuel consumption
(Kg/hr.)
Air Pollution Control Measures
As per EC received
1 Cogen Plant
Boiler 100 TPH 1 81
Indian/Imported Coal
17300/11500 ESP & Adequate
Stack Height
2 Boiler for phenol & Cumene
100 TPH 1 81 Indian/Imported
Coal 21000/14000
ESP with adequate stack height will be
provided
3 Incinerator for 304 Nm3/hr.
Vent gas
304 Nm3/hr.
1 30 Gas 25 m3/ hr. Adequate Stack Height will be
provided
4 DG Set (1 no.) 1500 KVA 1 25 HSD 500 lit/hr. Adequate Stack Height will be
provided
Amendment Required for (Total after amendment)
1 Boiler-1 100 TPH
1 81
Indian/Imported Coal/
Imported Coal+ Lignite
46000/42000/ 16000+38000
ESP & Adequate Stack Height
2 Boiler-2 with
Power Generator
100 TPH
3 Incinerator 36440
Nm3/hr. 1 30 Gas 29
Adequate Stack Height will be
provided
4 DG Set 1500 KVA 1 30 HSD 500 lit/hr. Adequate Stack Height will be
provided
5 DG Set 1500 KVA 1 30 HSD 500 lit/hr. Adequate Stack Height will be
provided
2.16 Stack Details
Details of flue gas stacks and process vent emissions are provided as below;
Table 2-23: Details of Flue Gas Stack
S. No.
Stack Attached to Capacity Stack Nos.
Stack Height
Air Pollution Control Measures
As per EC received
1 Cogen Plant Boiler 100 TPH 1 81 ESP & Adequate Stack Height
2 Boiler for phenol &
Cumene 100 TPH 1 81
ESP with adequate stack height will be provided
3 Incinerator for 304 Nm3/hr. Vent gas
304 Nm3/hr. 1 30 Adequate Stack Height will be provided
4 DG Set (1 no.) 1500 KVA 1 25 Adequate Stack Height will be provided
Amendment Required for (Total after Amendment)
1 Boiler-1 100 TPH
1 81 ESP & Adequate Stack Height 2
Boiler-2 with Power Generator
100 TPH
3 Spent air Incinerator 36440 Nm3/hr. 1 30 Adequate Stack Height will be provided
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 80
S. No.
Stack Attached to Capacity Stack Nos.
Stack Height
Air Pollution Control Measures
4 DG Set- 1 1500 KVA 1 30 Adequate Stack Height will be provided
5 DG Set- 2 1500 KVA 1 30 Adequate Stack Height will be provided
Note: DG Sets will be used only during Power failure.
Table 2-24: Details of Process Vents
Stack Attached to Nos. of Stack
Stack Height in m
Pollutants Emitted Air Pollution Control Measure
As per EC received
Process vent 1 30 VOC Incinerator
Amendment required for (Total after Amendment)
Process vent 1 30 VOC Incinerator
Process Emergency Relief (Intermittent)
1 65 HC Flare
Coal Handling-1
(Crusher House) 1 17 PM Bag Filter
2.16.1 Air Pollution Control Measures
Details of air pollution control measures are given in Table 2-25.
Table 2-25: Details of Air Pollution Control Measures
APCM Attached with Process
Plant Frequency of emission Description of APCM
Incinerator Phenol Continuous Regenerative type thermal incinerator
with destruction efficiency of 98%.
Flare Cumene Continuous / Intermittent Derrick supported, steam assisted flare
with 20% smokeless capacity
Incinerator / Flare
Cyclohexanol, MIBK, IPA Continuous / Intermittent -
Bag Filter Coal Handling-1
(Crusher House) Continuous / Intermittent -
ESP Boiler Continuous / Intermittent Efficiency will be 99.928 %
Incinerator
Incinerators are an important Air Pollution Control Measure (APCM) used to restrict the emission of volatile organic
compounds (VOC) in the environment. VOCs are the common air pollutants emitted by the chemical and
petrochemical industries. Emissions of VOCs originate from breathing and loading losses from storage tanks,
venting of process vessels, leaks from piping and equipment, waste water streams and heat exchange systems.
Incinerators destruct the VOCs in the vent streams by oxidation which can be thermal oxidation or catalytic. M/s
DPL shall employ regenerative type thermal oxidizers for destructing the VOCs. The entire assembly consists of 3
tanks filled with ceramic media for the exchange of heat, combustion chamber with burner system and related air
ducting system equipped with valves and fan. The tanks are connected via a combustion chamber.
The solvent laden air is driven through the RTO by the fan and led, in sequence via time controlled valves to one or
other of the regeneration tanks. The solvent laden air flows through the hot heat exchanger material (ceramic bed)
bottom to top and gets pre heated, in the process undergoing oxidation here itself. Further oxidation takes place in
the combustion chamber. From here the hot purified air flows through other tanks transferring its heat to the
ceramic packing. In this manner the entire cycle continues. The solvent free air is discharged through a stack of
adequate height to the environment. On the stack are attached analysers for SOx, NOx, THC and CO.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 81
Figure 2-8: Diagram of Incineration
Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)
Electrostatic precipitators (ESP) are commonly used on coal fired boilers to remove and collect suspended particles
from the flue gas coming from the boiler and helps limit particulate emission at the stack outlet to a required
minimum.
The ESP uses electrical forces to move the particles out of the flowing gas stream and onto the collector electrodes.
The SPM in the incoming flue gas are given an electric charge by forcing them to pass through a corona, a region in
which the gaseous ions flow. A strong electric field exists due to the discharge electrodes held at a high voltage.
This electric field forces the charged particles to the walls which are further removed from the surface.
M/s DPL shall use (4+1) field electrostatic precipitator for keeping a check on the suspended matter. The ESP shall
be designed for maximum continuous rating of the boiler and 70% Lignite + 30% Imported coal case which shall
be the governing case. Also, the ESP shall be designed for outlet dust concentration (ODC) of 30 mg/Nm3.
Basic components of the system shall be;
Housing
Funnels
Ash hoppers
Gas distribution screens
Emitting electrodes
Collecting electrodes
Rapping system
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 82
Figure 2-9: Diagram of ESP
Bag Filter
Bag filters are a reliable, efficient and economic dust extraction system employed in the coal handling area to
capture any dust emanating during coal transportation. The suspended particles in the dust laden stream are
deposited on the filter media due to combined activity of diffusion and electrostatic attraction and eventually the
particles get separated by gravity settling.
Bag filters consist of numerous vertical bags. They are suspended with open ends attached to a manifold. The
hopper at the bottom serves as a collector for the dust. The gas entering through the inlet duct strikes a baffle
plate, which causes the larger particles to fall due to gravity. The carrier gas then flows to the tubes and then
outward through the fabric leaving the particulate matter as a cake on the bag surface.
M/s DPL shall install bag filter with a design capacity of 6300 m3/hr. with inlet load to the tune of 15-20 gm/m3.
Typical components shall include:
Housing assembly
Inlet duct
Outlet duct
Hopper
Rotary valve with motor
Bag plate assembly
Efficiency of the above system shall be to the tune of 99.8%.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 83
Figure 2-10: Diagram of Bag Filter
2.17 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
2.17.1 Quantification, Classification, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid / Hazardous
Waste
The solid / Hazardous Waste will be collected and temporarily stored in Hazardous Waste Storage Area as per
hazardous waste rules within the plant premises. The details of the solid and hazardous waste generation,
quantification, classification, collection, transportation and disposal facility as per Hazardous Waste Rules 2016 and
its amendment are mentioned in Table 2-20. Hazardous waste will be disposed to M/s. Saurastra Enviro Projects
Pvt. Ltd. (SEPPL) for Integrated Common Hazardous Waste Management Facility. Acceptance letter is given as
Figure 2-11.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 84
Table 2-26: Hazardous Waste Generation and disposal Details
S. No.
Type of Waste
Hazardous Waste Category Waste Quantity in MTPA
Treatment / Disposal As per Rule 2008
As per Rule 2016
As per EC received
Addition Amendment
Required
1 ETP Sludge 34.3 35.3 3120 -2553 567 Collection, Storage, Transportation and Disposal at TSDF
site. Salt Sale/ TSDF Site
2 Used Oil 5.1 5.1 3000 0 3000 L Collection, storage, Transportation & Disposal by selling to
Registered Re-processor
3 Boiler Ash 36.2 37.2 48396 100782 149178 Collection, storage, Transportation & Disposal by selling to
brick manufacturer or cement industry
4 Spent Carbon from process &
from DM/CPU/ETP 35.3 36.2 66 -25 41
Collection, Storage, Transportation and Disposal at TSDF site.
5 Discarded Container/ bags 33.3 33.1 240000 0 240000 Collection, decontamination, storage, transportation & sell
to registered vendor
6 Spent Resin 19.1 35.2 0 9 9 Collection, Storage, Transportation and Disposal at TSDF
site.
8 Spent Catalyst/ Adsorbent 35.1 19.2 0 163 163 Collection, Storage, Transportation and Disposal at TSDF
site.
9 Heavies from MIBK plant H 3 C 1 0 2424 2424 Send to Authorized Vendor / CHWIF
10 Heavies from Acetophenone
plant H 3 C 1 0 50 50 Send to Authorized Vendor / CHWIF
11 Lights from Acetophenone
plant H 3 C 1 0 10 10 Send to Authorized Vendor / CHWIF
12 Spent resin from DM/CPU 34.2 35.2 0 7 7 Collection, Storage, Transportation and Disposal at TSDF
site.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 85
Figure 2-11: Membership of Saurashtra Enviro Projects Pvt. Ltd., Samkhyali
2.17.2 Measures to be taken to Minimize Manual Handling
The Solid/ Hazardous waste will be collected and stored in Hazardous waste storage area within the plant in the line
of Hazardous waste management rules.
Solid Wastes will be properly handled in closed containers and properly stored in hazardous waste storage areas as
per rules having suitable lining and also bunding to avoid overflow of spillage waters which can contaminate the
surroundings.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 86
All waste is being handled with proper PPEs ensuring safety of the individuals working with the solid waste
handling.
The wastes are handed in drums and HDPE Bags and further transferred at the storage location in the Solid cum
Hazardous Waste Storage.
Kitchen/Canteen wastes and other biodegradable wastes will be sent to Vermi-composting
2.17.3 Methodology of de-contamination and disposal of discarded containers
The procedure of shifting empty drums and carboys from the Plant to the hazardous scrap yard and final disposal
to an authorized/approved scrap dealer will be as follows. All required PPE must be worn by the person during the
entire process of the decontamination of the drums and carboys. (i.e. suitable hand gloves, chemically resistant
boots, safety helmet, chemical splash goggles, a face shield, etc.
2.17.4 Other Solids Wastes
Bio-medical Wastes
Occupational Health Center is provided at site. It is managed by qualified Doctor and Nursing staff round the clock.
Very small quantity of waste comprises of discarded medicines, soiled waste such as dressing, bandages and
material contaminated with blood will be generated. The generated waste will be periodically handed over to
authorized vendors as per SPCB regulations and biomedical waste management rules 1998.
Electronic Wastes
E-waste/ Electronic waste will mainly be generated from the computer lab and administrative buildings. E-Waste
comprises of discarded computers, copiers, fax machines, inverters, cell phones, CD’s, LAN Cables, Keyboards,
Mouse, SMPS, Fuses, Data cables, mobile/laptop peripherals like earphones, chargers, circuit boards, printer
cartridges etc. Electronic wastes will be handled as per the provisions of the E-Wastes (Management and Handling)
Rules, 2011
2.18 Project scheduling
Project schedule is given as following;
Figure 2-12: Project Scheduling for the Project
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 87
3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
3.1 General
This chapter describes of the existing environmental status of the study area with reference to the prominent
environmental attributes. The study area covers 10 km radius around the project site. The landuse and socio-
economic aspects were studied with respect to 10 km radius around the site.
The existing environmental setting is considered to adjudge the baseline conditions which are described with
respect to climate, atmospheric conditions, water quality, soil quality, ecology, socio-economic profile, landuse and
places of archaeological importance.
3.2 Methodology
The methodology for conducting the baseline environmental survey obtained from the guidelines given in the EIA
Manual of the MoEF. Baseline information with respect to air, noise, water and land quality in the study area was
collected by conducting primary sampling/field studies during the summer season i.e. March, 2017- May, 2017.
3.3 Study Area
The study area is considered to be the area within 10 km radius of the site. The EIA guidelines of the MoEF
mandate the study area in this manner for EIA’s.
3.4 Land use / Land cover
3.4.1 Classification of Land use and Land cover
The National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA), Government of India, conducted a land use survey using Remote
Sensing Techniques in the year 1988-89 at the behest of the Planning Commission for classifying land by visual
interpretation techniques and digital techniques. NRSA’s output resulted in a two-level system of classification,
comprising seven first level of classification of land use / landcover categories. Some of these categories required
further classification, leading to a second level of classification that resulted in further sub-categories.
This system of classification has been the basis for Kadam’s landuse / landcover studies. Whilst these categories are
generally found relevant with respect to describing landuse and landcover classes in the Indian context, sometimes
modifications are required, and made, to include additional sub-categories which are more relevant in describing
the landuse and landcover for a particular study. Such sub-categories are defined, in any case.
A synopsis of the above discussion is summarized and presented in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1: Synopsis of Landuse / Landcover Classification Used for the Project
S. No. First Level Classification Second Level Classification
1. Built-up Land or Habitation Residential / Commercial
Industrial
2. Agricultural Land
Crop Land
Fallow Land
Plantations
3. Forests
Evergreen / Semi-Evergreen Forests
Deciduous Forests
Degraded Forest or Scrub
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 88
S. No. First Level Classification Second Level Classification
Forest Blank
Forest Plantations
Mangroves
4. Wastelands
Salt-Affected Land
Waterlogged Land
Marshy / Swampy Land / Mud Land Area
Gullied / Ravenous Land
Land without Scrub
Sandy Area (Coastal and Desertic)
Barren Rocky / Stony Waste / Sheet Rock Area
5. Water Bodies Reservoir / Lakes / Ponds / Tanks
River Beds
6. Others
Shifting Cultivation
Salt pan
Grassland / Grazing Land/ Grass cover
Snow Covered / Glacial Area
Mining Area
7. Vegetation Cover
Scrub
Open vegetation
Close vegetation
3.4.2 Study Area
The study area has been defined as an area covering the buffer distance of 10 km of project site at Dahej, Gujarat.
3.4.3 Methodology of Land use Pattern Studies
The methodology employed for preparation of Land use/ cover map included:
Data Collection
Interpretation of satellite data
Ground truth study
Final Map preparation
Data Collection
Downloading of Google Earth images.
Topographical maps as base map.
Quick reconnaissance survey of the study area to get a feel of the entire ground area which can aid in the
preliminary interpretation of the data.
Interpretation of Satellite Data
The downloaded Google Earth images was interpreted considering the basic elements of interpretation such as
tone, size, shape, texture, pattern, location, association, shadow, aspect and resolution along with ground truth and
ancillary information collected during the preliminary reconnaissance survey the interpretation was accomplished.
Ground truth study
The aim of ground truth studies is to confirm whether the interpreted landuses are correct thus improving the
quality of the output. It also allows interaction with local parties and stakeholders, thereby giving background
information on the landuse.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 89
Final Map preparation
The proportional presence of different land uses and land cover in terms of statistical percentages was derived for
the study area. Appropriate legends were used to represent the various categories of land use and land cover, and
were then written on the prepared land use and land cover maps.
3.4.4 Ground Survey
The field survey was carried out around radial distance of 10 km from the project site. The survey consisted of
traversing the study area, cross-checking of identified features with those represented on the map. Field notes
were kept in the form of log sheets that recorded information pertaining to co-ordinates, photographs and identified
landuses. Additional features identified or remarks made against existing interpretation were also recorded.
GPS readings were taken during the surveys wherever it was felt that additional confirmation in interpretation of
the data and also observations of land features were noted. Additionally, spot checks were also done to confirm the
land use / land cover interpretation even where confidence of interpretation was high. Table 3-2 enumerates the
land features and its corresponding GPS readings of all the ground truthing locations selected.
Table 3-2: GPS readings within study area
S. No. Latitude (N) Longitude (E) Location Classes
1 21° 41’ 41.9” 72° 35’ 50.5” Ambetha Project site - Deepak Phenolics
2 21° 44’ 39.0” 72° 40’ 11.4” Samatpore Agricultural land - Sorghum grown for fodder
3 21° 40’ 48.9” 72° 35’ 40.3” Ambetha Mudflat
4 21° 41’ 06.4” 72° 38’ 31.5” Suva Barren land
5 21° 41’ 03.1” 72° 39’ 56.4” Rahiyad Agricultural land
6 21° 45’ 07.6“ 72° 38’ 40.9” Wav Water body
3.4.5 Land use and Land cover Pattern Studies
The land use and land cover of the above mentioned study area comprises of various categories. The features
identified have been presented, considering the discussion provided in Table 3-3.
Table 3-3: Classification system
S. No. Primary Classification Secondary Classification
1. Built-up Land or Habitation Residential / Commercial
Industrial
2. Agricultural Land Crop/Fallow Land1
Plantation
3. Wastelands Land without Scrub
Mudflat
4. Water Bodies
Reservoir / Lakes / Ponds / Tanks
River Beds
Creeks
Sea
5. Vegetation Cover
Scrub
Open Vegetation
Close Vegetation
Marshy Vegetation
Mangroves
6. Forest Scrub (Forest)
1 Fallow land was not separately identified owing to its seasonal nature.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 90
S. No. Primary Classification Secondary Classification
Open Forest
Close Forest
7. Others Salt Pans
The images classified into the above-mentioned classes for different regions of interest are given in Figure 3-1. It
was observed that the landuses generally exhibit similar characteristics across the region, whilst certain land uses
differs. Land use/ cover classification is given in Annexure 11.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 91
Figure 3-1: Landuse Map of the Study Area
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 92
3.4.6 Class Wise Area Statistics
The area statistics of these classes are presented in Table 3-4.
Table 3-4: Area Statistics for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area
S. No.
Primary Classification
Secondary Classification Area, Secondary Class Area, Primary Class
km2 Ha. ~% km2 Ha. ~%
1 Built-up Land or
Habitation
Residential / Commercial 2.9 290 0.874 20.1 2010 6.06
Industrial 17.2 1720 5.186
2 Agricultural Land Crop Land/Fallow Land 24.96 2496 7.526
25.13 2513 7.58 Plantation 0.17 17 0.051
3 Wastelands Land without Scrub 19.03 1903 5.738
72.57 7257 21.88 Mudflat 53.54 5354 16.143
4 Water Bodies
Reservoir/Lakes/Ponds/ Tanks 2.94 294 0.886
95.81 9581 28.89 River Beds 72.54 7254 21.872
Sea Area 19.17 1917 5.78
Creeks 1.16 116 0.35
5 Vegetation Cover
Scrub 45.82 4582 13.815
84.51 8451 25.48
Open Vegetation 20.82 2082 6.278
Close Vegetation 4.55 455 1.372
Marshy Vegetation 1.93 193 0.582
Mangroves 11.39 1139 3.434
6 Forest Area
Scrubs (Forest) 1.14 114 0.344
4.71 471 1.42 Open Forest 1.24 124 0.374
Close Forest 2.33 233 0.703
7 Others Salt Pans 28.83 2883 8.693 28.83 2883 8.69
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 93
Figure 3-2: Pie Chart of Area Statistics for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area
The most observed category in the region was agriculture followed by Scrub, as per area covered. This concludes
the land use identification and description component of study. Photographs showing ground truth survey done at
project site and within study area is given in Annexure 12.
3.5 Proximity to Sea / Water Body
The proximity to sea / water bodies for the study area is tabulated in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5: Proximity to Sea / Water Bodies
Sea / Water Body Aerial Distance from the Centre of the Project Site
Bay of Cambay ~7.0 km in W
Narmada Estuary ~1.80 km in S
Ambheta Pond ~1.43km in SSW
Dahej Pond-1 ~1.90 km in NW
Dahej Pond -2 ~2.21 km in NW
Suva Pond ~6.03 km in ESE
Jolwa Pond ~5.98 km in NE
Vadadla Pond ~5.26 km in NE
Lakhigam Pond ~4.49 km in W
Vav Pond ~8.0 km in NE
Source: Google Earth and Ground Truth Survey
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 94
3.5.1 Important Features within the Study Area
Important Features within the Study Area
Details of the important features along with other sensitive ecological locations in the study area are provided in
Table 3-6.
Table 3-6: Important Features and Sensitive Ecological Locations in the Study Area2
S. No.
Sensitive Ecological Features Location Distance (~km)
Direction
1. National Park/Wildlife Sanctuary No - -
2. Tiger Reserve/Elephant Reserve /
Turtle Nesting Ground No - -
3. Core Zone of Biosphere Reserve No - -
4. Habitat for migratory birds Narmada Estuary 1.80 S
5. Reserved / Protected / Social Forests Reserve Forest 5.90 W
6.
Lakes / Reservoir / Dams / Canals / Ponds
Ambheta Pond 1.43 SSW
Dahej Pond-I 1.90 NW
Dahej Pond-II 2.21 NW
Suva Pond 6.03 ESE
Jolwa Pond 6.19 ENE
Vadadla Pond 5.26 NE
Lakhigam Pond 4.49 W
Kadodara Pond 9.0 NE
Vav Pond 8.0 NE
7. Stream/Rivers/Drains Narmada River 1.2 S
8. Estuary/Sea/Mangroves
Narmada Estuary 1.80 S
Bay of Cambay 7 W
Mangroves- Nr. Dahej Coast 7 W
9. Mountains/Hills No - -
10. Notified Archaeological sites No - -
11. Any other Archaeological sites No - -
12. Defense Installations No - -
13. Densely populated or built-up area Dahej 1.87 NW
14. Airports Vadodara 95 NE
15. Railway Station Dahej Railway Station 1.43 NW
3.6 Meteorology and Air Quality Modelling
3.6.1 Climate of the Study Area3
The general agro-climatic zone of the study area is Semi-Arid.
Information presented in subsequent paragraphs is from the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), Long Term
Climatological Tables, 1981-2010, Surat. These tables give useful information about a region’s weather, since they
are collected over a 30-year period. A copy of the long-term climatological data is enclosed as Annexure 14.
2 All information is based on satellite imagery and ground truth survey, Source of Table: Questionnaire by
MoEF
3 Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), Long Term Climatological Tables, 1981-2010, Surat.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 95
Temperature
Mean daily maximum temperature is recorded in the month of April at 33.4 °C.
January is generally the coldest month, with a minimum temperature of 11.4 °C.
During the post-monsoon months of October and November, day temperatures remain between 18-24 ºC. In
winters, i.e. December, January and February, average day temperatures remain between 11.4-12.6 ºC.
Wind
The first, second and third predominant wind direction are shown in Table 3-7. It shows that Northwest (NW) is
predominant wind direction during daytime and during night time/evening time.
Table 3-7: Predominant Wind Direction
Month
Predominant Wind Direction (From)
First Second Third
Morning Evening Morning Evening Morning Evening
January N NW NE N NW NE
February N NW NE N NW W
March N NW NE W NW N
April SW SW N W S NW
May SW SW W W S S
June SW SW W S S W
July SW SW W W S S
August SW SW W W S S
September SW SW W W S S
October NE NW E SW S W
November NE NW E NE SE N
December NE NW N N E NE
Rainfall
The total rainfall in year is observed to be 459.2 mm. Distribution of rainfall by season is 0.8 mm in winter
(December, January, February), 1.5 mm in summer (March, April, May), 286.7 mm in monsoons (June, July,
August, September) and 24.4 mm in post-monsoons (October - November).
Cloud Cover
The area remains cloudy between July-August, which is the active period of the monsoon season. Generally cloud
cover ranges up-to 13-17 OKTAS during this monsoon season. During post-monsoon season, cloud cover almost
becomes 0 OKTAS occasionally going to 3-5 OKTAS. In the summer season cloud cover is predominantly 0 OKTAS.
Humidity
Most humid conditions are found in the monsoons, followed by summer, post-monsoons, and winter in that order.
Mornings are more humid than evenings and humidity ranges from a high of 64-86% in monsoon mornings to a
low of 33-80% in winter evenings. During post-monsoon season, in morning humidity remains between 65-83 %
and in the evening it remains between 43-70%.
3.6.2 Site specific Meteorology
Site-specific meteorological data for Summer season, 2017 has been collected at the site of M/s. Deepak Phenolics
Limited, Dahej located adjacent to the proposed site. The parameters for which data has been collected are:
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 96
Wind Speed
Wind direction
Temperature
Relative Humidity
Cloud Cover
Monitoring Methodology for Meteorological data is given in Table 3-8.
Table 3-8: Monitoring Methodology of Meteorological Data
S. No.
Env. Component
Location Parameters Period Frequency Methodology
1. Meteorology Dahej SEZ
Wind speed, wind direction,
temperature and rainfall
March 2017 – May 2017
Hourly for all parameters
EPA 454.
Cloud cover is done by visual interpretation of the
sky by the observer.
Site Specific Data of Season
Site specific meteorological data shows that average wind speed in summer season of year 2017 is 3.5 m/s
and maximum wind speed of 8.3 m/s.
Wind rose diagram prepared for the same is shown as Figure 3-3.
It can be observed that in summer season, wind blows mostly from West South West sector.
Average temperature recorded for summer season was 33.2°C with maximum temperature of 44°C and
minimum of 11°C which is a characteristic of this study area.
The data obtained has been compiled to obtain average data. Compiled mean meteorological data is represented in
Table 3-9.
Table 3-9: Average Mean Meteorological Data for Summer Season 2017
Hour Temperature
(°C) Relative
Humidity (%) Wind Speed
(m/sec) Wind Direction
(from) Cloud Cover,
(Oktas)
Rainfall in Total,
(mm)
1 29.0 47.8 3.0 WSW 0.0 0.0
2 29.6 49.8 3.1 WSW 0.0 0.0
3 29.3 49.5 3.2 W 0.0 0.0
4 29.3 49.7 3.1 WSW 0.0 0.0
5 29.4 49.7 2.9 WSW 0.0 0.0
6 29.7 49.5 2.9 WSW 0.0 0.0
7 31.2 48.0 2.9 WSW 0.0 0.0
8 32.7 45.0 3.0 WSW 0.0 0.0
9 33.4 40.3 3.0 WSW 0.0 0.0
10 34.7 38.9 3.1 WSW 0.0 0.0
11 36.1 35.0 3.1 WSW 0.0 0.0
12 36.7 29.7 3.3 WSW 0.0 0.1
13 36.9 30.6 3.3 WSW 0.0 0.0
14 37.2 30.2 3.6 WSW 0.0 0.0
15 37.1 29.2 4.2 WSW 0.0 0.0
16 36.8 33.1 4.3 WSW 0.0 0.0
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 97
Hour Temperature
(°C) Relative
Humidity (%) Wind Speed
(m/sec) Wind Direction
(from) Cloud Cover,
(Oktas)
Rainfall in Total,
(mm)
17 35.8 36.8 4.4 WSW 0.0 0.0
18 35.2 36.4 4.5 WSW 0.0 0.0
19 34.9 40.7 4.2 WSW 0.0 0.0
20 33.7 44.9 4.2 WSW 0.0 0.0
21 32.7 47.9 4.0 WSW 0.0 0.0
22 32.0 48.0 3.9 WSW 0.0 0.0
23 31.1 49.0 3.7 WSW 0.0 0.0
Average/ Predominant
33.2 41.7 3.5 WSW 0.0 0.0
Figure 3-3: Windrose Diagram for Summer season 2017
3.7 Ambient Air Quality
3.7.1 Season and Period of Monitoring
The ambient air monitoring work was carried out in month of from March, 2017 to May, 2017.
3.7.2 Selected Sampling Stations
Depending upon the purpose of the study IS: 5182 (Part XIV) lays down various criteria for selecting sampling
stations. For this EIA, the purpose is to ascertain the baseline pollutant concentrations in ambient air. Accordingly,
the criterion was selected to ascertain quality of air at important human settlement. The annual wind direction has
been considered for selecting AAQM stations. The annual first predominant wind direction would be from WSW,
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 98
second would be from W, third would be NW, fourth would be from N. Locations selected for ambient air quality
monitoring are presented in Table 3-10 . Sampling location is given in Figure 3-4.
Table 3-10: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Details
AAQM Station
Location Latitude Longitude
Distance from Project
Site in Km
Direction w. r. t. Project
Site
Justification for selection of station
AA01 At DPL Project
Site 21°41’48.01”N 72°35’44.32”E 0.00 Base Selected as Base station
AA02 Ambheta Village
21°41’11.86”N 72°35’29.08”E 0.85 SSW Adjusent Habitation from the project site Downwind station
AA03 Lakhigam
Village 21°41’24.10”N 72°33’16.25”E 3.86 W
Habitation from the project site upwind station. Area is
also having a GIDC industrial estate as well as transport
hub.
AA04 Dahej Village 21°41’51.85”N 72°34’57.52”E 1.64 NW Downwind station. Purely rural habitation having agriculture land area.
AA05 Suva Village 21°41’16.98”N 72°39’14.84”E 6.00 ESE Downwind station on the border of industrial area.
AA06 Expanded Site 21°43’4.20”N 72°36’18.25”E 2.11 NNE Upwind station having
industrial area & habitation.
AA07 Vajapura Village
21°45’18.95”N 72°36’39.37”E 6.4 NNE Upwind station having
industrial area, Habitation and Agriculture lands.
AA08 Vadadla Village
21°43’44.70”N 72°38’2.44”E 4.93 NE
Crosswind Station having rural habitation with
commercial as well as agriculture land use.
3.7.3 Sampling Frequency
The frequency of monitoring was 24 hrs twice a week at each station spread over the season, with gaseous
samples being changed six times (at 48-hour intervals).
Parameters Monitored and Methods Used
The parameters monitored were Particulate Matter (PM10), Particulate Matter (PM2.5), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Oxides
of Nitrogen (NOX), Hydrocarbon (HC) and Carbone Monoxide (CO). The detailed monitoring methodology for
ambient air quality is given in Table 3-11.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 99
Table 3-11: Methodology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
S. No.
Env. Component
Sampling location
Total Sampling
Period
Sampling Frequency
Sampling Parameters
Sampling equipment
Sample Analysis
Method Analytical Equipment
Sensitivity Detection
Limit
1. Ambient Air
Quality
8
Locations
March, 2017 – May, 2017
Two 24 –hour samples every week at each
station
PM10 Respirable Dust Sampler (RDS)
APM - 460
Electronic balance
0.001 mg 1 μg Gravimetric (HVS) –
IS: 5182: Part 4, with cyclone
PM2.5 Fine particulate
sampler AAS- 127 Electronic balance
0.001 mg 1 μg WINS Impactor
Method
SO2
Gaseous Flow Meter with
impinger module (attached to RDS)
Spectro-photometer
1.27 µg/m3 8 μg IS: 5182:
Part 3
NOX
Gaseous Flow Meter with
impinger module (attached to RDS)
Spectro-photometer
0.19 µg/m3 10 μg IS: 5182:
Part 6
CO & HC Bladder with
pump Gas
chromatograph 1 ppm 1 ppm
Gas Chromatography method
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 100
Figure 3-4: Sampling Location Map
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 101
3.7.4 Results of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Complied average results of ambient air monitoring are presented in Table 3-12. Detailed AAQM results at 8 locations are given in Annexure 13.
Table 3-12: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results
Station Code
Sampling Location
NAAQM Standards
[CPCB]
Average Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3 and VOC in ppm)
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX NH3 HBr HCL Cl2 HCs CO VOC
[24 Hours] [1 Hour] [8 Hours] [1 Hour]
100 60 80 80 400 NS NS NS NS 2 NS
AAQ001 DPL
Project Site
Maximum 108 48 10.3 23.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1510 <1.142 <1.0
Minimum 58 21 <8.0 13.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1187 <1.142 <1.0
Average 82 33 <8.0 17.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1327 <1.142 <1.0
98%tile 105 48 10.2 22.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1494 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ002 Ambheta Village
Maximum 125 60 9.6 24.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1501 <1.142 <1.0
Minimum 58 18 <8.0 13.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1163 <1.142 <1.0
Average 83 32 <8.0 18.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1282 <1.142 <1.0
98%tile 119 55 9.4 23.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1485 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ003 Lakhigam
Village
Maximum 150 63 25.9 27.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1681 <1.142 <1.0
Minimum 76 28 9.0 17.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1435 <1.142 <1.0
Average 98 43 14.5 20.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1567 <1.142 <1.0
98%tile 146 61 23.6 26.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1679 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ004 Dahej Village
Maximum 126 52 9.4 31.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1432 <1.142 <1.0
Minimum 73 21 <8.0 16.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1137 <1.142 <1.0
Average 91 37 <8.0 22.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1334 <1.142 <1.0
98%tile 123 51 9.3 30.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1431 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ005 Suva
Village
Maximum 107 39 10.9 20.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1305 <1.142 <1.0
Minimum 58 18 <8.0 14.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 992 <1.142 <1.0
Average 77 27 <8.0 17.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1185 <1.142 <1.0
98%tile 103 38 10.6 20.1 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1295 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ006 Maximum 91 35 10.3 23.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1510 <1.142 <1.0
Minimum 44 15 <8.0 13.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1187 <1.142 <1.0
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 102
Station Code
Sampling Location
NAAQM Standards
[CPCB]
Average Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3 and VOC in ppm)
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX NH3 HBr HCL Cl2 HCs CO VOC
[24 Hours] [1 Hour] [8 Hours] [1 Hour]
100 60 80 80 400 NS NS NS NS 2 NS
EPL Project
Site
Average 71 26 <8.0 17.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1327 <1.142 <1.0
98%tile 91 35 10.2 22.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1494 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ007 Nr.
Vajapura Village
Maximum 76 34 10.6 18.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1252 <1.142 <1.0
Minimum 47 18 <8.0 <10.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 987 <1.142 <1.0
Average 65 25 8.5 12.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1114 <1.142 <1.0
98%tile 75 33 10.4 18.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1243 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ008 Vadadla Village
Maximum 103 43 18.9 44.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1164 <1.142 <1.0
Minimum 62 25 <8.0 19.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 972 <1.142 <1.0
Average 81 32 11.0 30.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1075 <1.142 <1.0
98%tile 101 41 18.5 44.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1164 <1.142 <1.0
Observations
The above results with the value range indicators provided by CPCB for Industrial, residential, rural & other area indicates:
In summer season an average concentration;
PM10 was observed to be varying from 65 to 98 µg/ m3. An average concentration of PM10 levels are well within the permissible limits for all locations.
PM2.5 levels was observed to be in range of 25 to 43 µg/m3 which is less than the permissible limits for all locations.
SO2 and NOX is observed to be within the specified limit of CPCB.
HC is observed to be in range of 1075 to 1567 µg/m3.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 103
3.8 Noise Environment
3.8.1 Monitoring Methodology of Noise Level
Monitoring of noise is done by identifying suitable number of noise quality monitoring locations. Background noise
quality is monitored in dB (A) Leq (d) and dB (A) Leq (n) at the selected locations
Methodology for Noise level analysis
Identification of sources of noise and vibrations at proposed project.
Identification of baseline monitoring station within study area.
Noise sampling during study period and report its results.
To run SoundPLAN software for assessment of noise levels.
Determining possible impacts of Noise & Vibrations on the environment.
Checking whether the increase of SPL in the locations surrounding the project.
Suggestions of mitigation measures of Noise/Vibrations and to reduce noise/vibrations of sources exceeding the
allowable limits of SPL.
Table 3-13: Monitoring methodology
Env. Component
Sampling location
Sampling Frequency
Methodology
Sample collection Sampling
Parameter Sampling equipment
Detection Limit
Ambient Noise 8
Locations
Once during the study (Hourly
reading for 24 hours at each
location)
Sound Level Measurement
(SLM)
Noise Level Meter
0.1 dB (A) Decibels –
dB (A)
The standard for monitoring ambient noise level as per CPCB guidelines is as given in Table 3-14.
Table 3-14: Ambient Air Quality Standards in respect of Noise for Different Areas/Zones
Ambient Air Quality Standards in Respect of NOISE
Area Code
Category Limits in dB(A) Leq*
Day Time Night Time
THE NOISE POLLUTION (REGULATION AND CONTROL) RULES,
2000
A Industrial 75.0 70.0
B Commercial 65.0 55.0
C Residential 55.0 45.0
D Silence 50.0 45.0
Note: Day Time: 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM; Night Time: 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM
dB(A) Leq*: denotes the time weighted average of the level of sound in decibels on scale A which is relatable to human hearing.
3.8.2 Noise Level Results
Locations for noise monitoring were identify by desktop study and fix the location during field survey at 2 km
maximum from the source of noise generation and at sensitive locations ambient noise monitoring i.e. habitation
area. The average noise level are presented in Table 3-15.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 104
Table 3-15: Noise Level distance, direction, lat./ long & Readings
Location Code
Location Date Category Distance (km) Direction Lat./ Long CPCB Limits in dB (A)
Average Noise levels in dB (A)
Day Time Night Time Day Time Night Time
NL01 At project Boundary (NE) 11-Apr-17 Industrial - - 21°41'55.08"N 72°35'47.70"E
75.0 70.0 69.0 60.9
NL02 At project site (ETP) 11-Apr-17 Industrial - - 21°41'55.29"N 72°35'42.66"E
75.0 70.0 69.1 66.0
NL03 At Project boundary (East) 09-Apr-17 Industrial - - 21°41'48.93"N 72°35'48.95"E
75.0 70.0 65.5 63.7
NL04 Admin Office 10-Apr-17 Industrial - - 21°41'42.40"N 72°35'42.59"E
75.0 70.0 65.5 63.7
NL05 Nr. DG Set 09-Apr-17 Industrial - - 21°41'45.40"N 72°35'42.17"E
75.0 70.0 69.7 65.5
NL06 Main gate 10-Apr-17 Industrial - - 21°41'42.06"N 72°35'50.29"E
75.0 70.0 69.8 65.4
NL07 Ambetha village 12-Apr-17 Residential 0.80 SW 21°41'17.88"N 72°35'31.30"E
55.0 45.0 55.5 44.9
NL08 Dahej village 12-Apr-17 Residential 1.63 NW 21°42'37.18"N 72°34'58.86"E
55.0 45.0 54.8 45.1
Observations
Noise level during day time & night time, in Industrial area & Residential area was observed within CPCB standards i.e. Industrial area (75 dBA (d) & 70 dBA (n)) and
residential area (55 dBA (d) & 45 dBA (n)).
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 105
3.9 Water Environment
3.9.1 Analysis Method Adopted
Surface and Ground water samples are collected using manual grab sampling technique.
The samples were further analysed as per the APHA Standard Methods (22nd Edition). Table 3-16 below describes
analytical methodology for parameters to be analysed and with minimum detection limit of the instruments
available at KEC laboratory.
Table 3-16: Analysis Methods Adopted for Surface Water Samples
S. No
Parameters Methodology Minimum
Detection Limit
1 pH APHA: 4500-H+ B (22nd Edition), pH meter 1
3 Temperature APHA: 2550 B (22nd Edition), Standard Thermometer 1 °C
4 Turbidity APHA: 2130 B (22nd Edition), Nephelometric <0.1 NTU
5 TDS APHA: 2540C (22nd Edition), Gravimetric 20 mg/l
6 Electrical conductivity APHA: 2510 B (22nd Edition), Conductivity meter 1µmoh/cm
7 COD APHA: 5220 B(22nd Edition), Titrimetric Open reflux method <5 mg/l
8 BOD IS: 3025(part-44), Iodometric <3 mg/l
9 Chlorides APHA:4500Cl- B (22nd Edition), Titrimetric 1.5 mg/l
10 Phenol APHA: 5530-D(22nd Edition), colorimetric 0.001 mg/l
11 Sulphates APHA:4500-E as SO4 2-(22nd Edition), Turbid metric < 1 mg/l
12 Total Hardness APHA: 2340-C (22nd Edition), Titrimetric(EDTA method) < 10 mg/l
13 Ca++ Hardness APHA: 3500-B-Ca (22nd Edition) Titrimetric,(EDTA method) < 4 mg/l
14 Mg++ Hardness APHA: 3500-B-Mg (22nd Edition), By difference 8 mg/l
15 Total Alkalinity APHA: 2320 B (22nd Edition), Titrimetric <10 mg/l
16 Nitrate IS:3025 (part-34),3.3, colorimetric <0.1 mg/l
17 Fluoride APHA:4500 F-D(22nd Edition), Colorimetric <0.1 mg/l
18 Sodium APHA:3500 Na-B (22nd Edition), Flame emission Photometric <1 mg/l
19 Potassium APHA: 3500 K-B (22nd Edition) Flame emission Photometric <1 mg/l
20 Calcium APHA Edition 22 (3500 Ca- B) Titrimetric (EDTA Method) 1 mg/l
21 Magnesium APHA Edition 22 (3500 Mg- B), by difference 3 mg/l
22 Salinity APHA: 2520 B (22nd Edition), Electrical Conductivity method -
23 Total Nitrogen APHA: 4500 N Org, Micro Kjeldahl Distillation (22nd Edition),Titrimetric 0.06 mg/l
24 Total Phosphorous APHA: 4500 P-C (22nd Edition), colorimetric <1 mg/l
25 Dissolved Oxygen APHA: 4500O-C(22nd Edition), Iodometric 0.5 mg/l
26 Ammonical Nitrogen APHA: 4170-B (22nd Edition)/ IS:3025 (part-34), 1988, Distillation &
colorimetric <0.01 mg/l
27 SAR Flamephotmetric & EDTA method -
28 Heavy Metals
a Arsenic (as As) APHA: 3500-As-A (22nd Edition)/ APHA: 3111-B(AAS)(22nd Edition) <0.002 mg/l
b Cadmium (as Cd) APHA: 3500-Cd-A (22nd Edition)/ APHA: 3111-B(AAS)(22nd Edition <0.003 mg/l
c Chromium (as Cr) APHA: 3500-Cr-B(22nd Edition), colorimetric <0.003 mg/l
d Copper (as Cu) APHA: 3500-Cu-A (22nd Edition)/ APHA: 3111-B(AAS)(22nd Edition)
IS:3025(part 42):1992 <0.05 mg/l
e Cyanide (as CN) APHA: 4500 CN- D & E (22nd Edition), colorimetric 0.003 mg/l
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 106
S. No
Parameters Methodology Minimum
Detection Limit
f Iron (as Fe) APHA: 3500-Fe-B (22nd Edition), colorimetric <0.1 mg/l
g Lead (as Pb) APHA: 3500-Ld-A (22nd Edition)/ APHA: 3111-B(AAS)(22nd Edition) <0.01 mg/l
h Mercury (as Hg) APHA: 3500-Hg-A (22nd Edition)/ APHA: 3111-B(AAS)(22nd Edition) <0.001 mg/l
i Manganese (as Mn) APHA: 3500-Mn-A (22nd Edition)/ APHA: 3111-B(AAS)(22nd Edition) <0.04 mg/l
j Nickel (as Ni) APHA: 3500-Ni-A (22nd Edition)/ APHA: 3111-B(AAS)(22nd Edition <0.02 mg/l
k Zinc (as Zn) APHA: 3500-Zn-A (22nd Edition)/ APHA: 3111-B(AAS)(22nd Edition) <0.08 mg/
l Boron (as B) APHA: 4500 B-C (22nd Edition), colorimetric <0.02 mg/l
29 Total Coliform APHA: 9221-B (22nd Edition), Multiple Tube Fermentation Absent
30 Fecal Coliform APHA: 9221-E (22nd Edition), Multiple Tube Fermentation Absent
3.9.2 Primary Data Collection
Water samples were collected during the Baseline study period. The details of ground water and surface water
sampling, analysis results and observations of baseline water quality is given in further details.
3.9.3 Details of Surface Water Sampling Locations
Surface water sampling locations are selected based on review of land use plan, surface drainage pattern/ground
water flow direction & nearby site habitation village /locations in 10 km radius of project.
The details of surface water sampling locations are presented in below table
Table 3-17: Details of Surface Water Sampling Locations
Code Location Source Date of
Sampling
Latitude
(N) Longitude (E)
Justification of Sample collection
SW 1 Vadadala Pond 27.04.17 21°43'48.09" 72°37'55.85" To check water quality of the stagnant water body coming in the study area
SW 2 Vav Pond 27.04.17 21°45'10.04" 72°38'45.36" To check water quality of the stagnant water body coming in the study area
SW 3 Kadodara Pond 27.04.17 21°45'50.47" 72°38'45.68" To check water quality of the stagnant water body coming in the study area
SW 4 Narmada river
(D/s) near Ambeta Estuary 27.04.17 21°40'47.69" 72°35'44.56"
To check water quality of the flowing water body
coming in the downstream of the study
area
SW 5 Narmada river
(U/s) near Suva Estuary 27.04.17 21°40'48.66" 72°39'33.87"
To check water quality of the flowing water body coming in the upstream
of the study area
Photographs of surface water sampling locations are given in Annexure 12.
3.9.4 Quality of Surface water
Analytical results of the surface water /Pond /River (Estuary) water samples are presented in Table 3-18 & Table
3-19.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 107
Table 3-18: Analysis Result of Pond Water Samples
S. No.
Parameters Unit
Classification for Inland Surface Water4 Surface water Quality
A B C D E SW1
Vadadala Pond
SW2
Vav Pond
SW3
Kadodara Pond
1 pH pH Scale 6.5 to 8.5 6.5 to 8.5 6.0 to 9.0 6.5 to 8.5 6.5 to 8.5 7.9 8.1 8.19
2 Total Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 6.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 NS 3.8 3.2 3.5
3 Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 500.0 NS 1500.0 NS 2100 512 488 421
4 Electrical Conductivity μmohs/cm NS NS NS 1000 2250 493 817 745
5 BOD mg/l 2.0 3.0 3.0 NS NS 5 8 6
7 Total Hardness mg/l 300 NS NS NS NS 160 300 150
8 Ca++ Hardness mg/l 200 NS NS NS NS 46 56 100
9 Mg++ Hardness mg/l 100 NS NS NS NS 114 244 50
10 Copper mg/l 1.5 NS 1.5 NS NS <0.03 <0.03 <0.03
11 Iron mg/l 0.3 NS 50 NS NS <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
12 Manganese mg/l 0.5 NS NS NS NS <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
13 Chlorides (as Cl) mg/l 250 NS 600 NS 600 106 169 178
14 Sulphates mg/l 400 NS 400 NS 1000 5 13 19
15 Nitrate (as NO3) mg/l 20 NS 50 NS NS 36.92 25.61 23.84
16 Fluoride mg/l 1.5 1.5 1.5 NS NS 0.52 0.71 0.50
17 Phenolic Compound mg/l 0.002 0.005 0.005 NS NS <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
18 Free Ammonia mg/l NS NS NS 1.2 NS Nil Nil Nil
19 Mercury mg/l 0.001 NS NS NS NS <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
20 Cadmium mg/l 0.01 NS 0.01 NS NS <0.003 <0.003 <0.003
21 Arsenic mg/l 0.05 NA 0.2 NS NS <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
22 Cyanide mg/l 0.05 0.05 0.05 NS NS <0.003 <0.003 <0.003
23 Lead mg/l 0.1 NS 0.1 NS NS <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
24 Zinc mg/l 15 NS 15 NS NS <0.03 <0.03 <0.03
25 Chromium mg/l 0.05 1 0.05 NS NS <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
26 Boron mg/l NS NS NS NS 2 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
4 IS 2296 – 1982 Inland Surface Water Standards
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 108
S. No.
Parameters Unit
Classification for Inland Surface Water4 Surface water Quality
A B C D E SW1
Vadadala Pond
SW2
Vav Pond
SW3
Kadodara Pond
27 Sodium Absorption Ratio mg/gm NS NS NS NS 26 1.54 1.87 3.08
28 Total Coliform MPN/100ml 50 500 5000 NS NS 2700 3300 3100
Note: Ns- Not Specified
Table 3-19: Analysis Result of Estuary Water Samples
S. No.
Parameters
Unit
Water Quality Standards for Coastal Waters Marine Outfalls
SW4- Nr. Ambeta Village
SW5- Nr. Suva
Narmada Estuary (D/s)
Narmada Estuary (U/s) SW-I SW-II SW-III SW-IV SW-V
1 pH - 6.5 to 8.5 6.5 to 8.5 6.5 to 8.5 6.0 to 9.0 6.0 to 9.0 7.41 7.21
2 Total Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 5.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.2 4.5
3 Colour and Odour - No Colour No Odour
No Colour No Odour
No Colour No Odour
No Colour No Odour
No Colour No Odour
No Colour No Odour
No Colour No Odour
4 Floating Matters mg/l None None None 10 NS None None
5 Suspended Solids mg/l None from Sewage or Industrial waste Origin
NS NS NS NS 39 26
6 Turbidity NTU NS 30 30 NS NS 2.8 1.7
7 BOD mg/l NS 3 NS 5 NS 5 7
8 Oil and Grease
(including Petroleum Products) mg/l 0.1 NS NS NS NS <0.4 <0.4
9 Mercury (as Hg) mg/l 0.001 NS NS NS NS <0.001 <0.001
10 Lead (as Pb) mg/l 0.001 NS NS NS NS <0.01 <0.01
S. No. Class Intended Use
1 A Drinking water source without conventional treatment but after disinfection
2 B Outdoor bathing (organized)
3 C Drinking water source with conventional treatment followed by disinfection
4 D Propagation of wild life, fisheries
5 E Irrigation, industrial cooling etc.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 109
S. No.
Parameters
Unit
Water Quality Standards for Coastal Waters Marine Outfalls
SW4- Nr. Ambeta Village
SW5- Nr. Suva
Narmada Estuary (D/s)
Narmada Estuary (U/s) SW-I SW-II SW-III SW-IV SW-V
11 Cadmium (as Cd) mg/l 0.01 NS NS NS NS <0.001 <0.001
12 Dissolved Iron (as Fe) mg/l NS NS 0.5 NS NS <0.1 <0.1
13 Dissolved Manganese (as Mn) mg/l NS NS 0.5 NS NS <0.04 <0.04
14 Faecal Coliform ml (MPN) NS 100/100 500/100 500/100 500/100 43 48
15 Sludge Deposits, Solid refuse floating Solids, Oil Grease and
Scum NS NS NS NS NS
None except for treated Sewage and Industrial waste Effluent
None None
Classification of Coastal/Marine Waters for Designated Best Uses
Class Designated Best Use
SW-I Salt
SW-II Bathing, Contact Water Sports and Commercial Fishing
SW-III Industrial Cooling, Recreation (Non-contact) and Aesthetics
SW-IV Harbor
SW-V Navigation and Controlled Waste Disposal
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 110
3.9.5 Observation of Surface water (Pond & River) quality
The baseline quality of water based on the results of the surface water quality monitoring within the study area, it
is observed that;
Pond water: Quality of pond water can be compared with class D as per classification of Inland Surface Water and
use for propagation of wild life and fisheries. If there is no alternate source for potable water then it can be used
for drinking purpose with suitable treatment
Estuary Water: The Quality of Narmada estuary is nearly matching with class SW-II as per costal water marine
standards.
3.9.6 Groundwater Monitoring Methodology
Monitoring methodology for groundwater is given in Table 3-20. The grab samples were manually collected and
analysed as per APHA Standard Methods (22nd Edition, 1998) for the parameters given in the EIA Manual of MoEF
(January 2001).
Table 3-20: Monitoring Methodology of Groundwater
Sampling Parameters Sample Analysis Methodology
pH pH meter 4500 H+ B
Temperature Thermometer 2550 B
Turbidity Nephlometer 2130 B
TDS Gravimetric 2540 C
Electrical Conductivity Conductivity Meter 2510 B
COD Volumetric 5220 B
BOD Volumetric IS 3025
Ammonical Nitrogen Nessler method 4500 NH3
Phenol S. Photometer 510 C *
Chlorides Argentometric 4500 cl- B
SO4-2 S. Photometer 4500 SO4-2
SAR F. Photometer (Na, K)
Titration ( Ca and Mg) Calculation
Total Hardness Titration 2340 C
Ca++ Hardness Titration EDTA 3500 Mg B
Mg++ Hardness Titration EDTA 3500 Mg B
Nitrate S. Photometer 4500 NO3-2
Sodium F. Photometer 3500 Na B
Potassium Flame photometer 3500 K B
Calcium Titration EDTA 3500 ca B
Magnesium Titration 3500 Mg B
Salinity Volumetric 4500 cl- B
Cu (Copper) S. Photometer 3500 Cu B
Zn (Zinc) S. Photometer / AAS 3500 Zn B
Coliform Count Fermentation Tube 9221 B
Faecal Coliform Multiple Tube Technique 9230 B
Boron S. Photometer 4500 B C
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 111
3.9.7 Groundwater Sampling Location
Sampling Location of groundwater is given in Table 3-21.
Table 3-21: Groundwater Sampling Locations
Code No.
Location Date of
Sampling Source
Distance in km from Site
Direction in km from Site
GW 1 Vadadla 12.05.2017 Dug well 4.82 NE
GW 2 Dahej 12.05.2017 Dug well 2.05 N
GW 3 Galenda 12.05.2017 Dug well 9.18 NE
GW 4 Rahiyad 12.05.2017 Dug well 7.56 E
GW 5 Jolva 12.05.2017 Dug well 5.77 E
GW 6 Koliyad 12.05.2017 Dug well 9.74 E
GW 7 Ambetha 12.05.2017 Bore well 0.90 S
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 112
3.9.8 Quality of Water (Physical, Chemical and Bacteriological)
Groundwater analysis results are given vide in Table 3-22.
Table 3-22: Groundwater analysis results
S. No.
Parameters Unit
IS 10500 Standard Limits for drinking water
Ground Water Quality
Acceptable Limit Permissible Limit GW 1 GW2 GW 3 GW 4 GW 5 GW 6 GW 7
1 pH pH scale 6.5-8.5 NR 7.69 7.88 7.03 7.28 7.32 7.71 7.01
2 Temperature °C - - 30 30 30 30 30 30 27
3 Turbidity NTU 1 5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
4 TDS mg/lit 500 2000 321 845 359 1455 1132 395 1412
5 Electrical
conductivity µmho/cm - - 497 1417 697 2356 1900 652 1850
6 COD mg/lit - - <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <5
7 BOD mg/lit - - <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <3
8 Phenol mg/lit 0.001 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
9 Chlorides mg/lit 250 1000 149 265 111 444 453 207 643
10 Sulphates mg/lit 200 400 102 67 33 194 34 37 61
11 Total Hardness mg/lit 200 600 130 340 200 390 290 280 230
12 Ca++ Hardness mg/lit - - 48 70 112 192 176 54 176
13 Mg++ Hardness mg/lit - - 82 270 88 198 114 226 54
14 Total Alkalinity mg/lit 200 600 140 220 50 100 110 180 40
15 Nitrate mg/lit 45 NR 29.52 38.1 34.42 23.08 38.87 40.94 <0.1
16 Fluoride mg/lit 1 1.5 1.57 0.71 0.75 1.21 2.27 1.94 0.34
17 Sodium mg/lit - - 79.0 132.4 61.4 287.1 221.7 112.7 420.4
18 Potassium mg/lit - - 8.0 15.6 7.20 16.2 11.3 9.60 22.3
19 Calcium mg/lit 75 200 19.24 28.06 44.89 76.65 70.54 21.64 70.5
20 Magnesium mg/lit 30 100 19.93 65.61 21.38 48.11 27.7 54.92 13.1
21 Salinity mg/lit - - 269.32 477.83 199.82 799.28 816.65 373.58 1159
22 Total Nitrogen mg/lit 0.5 NR 6.98 8.96 8.38 5.59 8.94 9.66 <0.01
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 113
S. No.
Parameters Unit
IS 10500 Standard Limits for drinking water
Ground Water Quality
Acceptable Limit Permissible Limit GW 1 GW2 GW 3 GW 4 GW 5 GW 6 GW 7
23 Total
Phosphorous mg/lit - - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
24 Dissolved Oxygen
mg/lit - - 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.9
25 Ammonical Nitrogen
mg/lit NS NS <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01
26 SAR - - - 3.00 3.11 1.88 6.30 5.64 2.91 12.03
27 Heavy Metals
a Arsenic (as As) mg/l 0.01 0.05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.002
b Cadmium (as
Cd) mg/l 0.003 NR <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003
c Cromium (as Cr) mg/l 0.05 NR <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.003
d Copper (as Cu) mg/l 0.05 1.5 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05
e Cyanide (as CN) mg/l 0.05 NR <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003
f Iron (as Fe) mg/l 0.3 NR <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.3
g Lead (as Pb) mg/l 0.01 NR <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
h Mercury (as Hg) mg/l 0.001 NR <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
i Manganese (as
Mn) mg/l 0.1 0.3 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
j Nickel (as Ni) mg/l 0.02 NR <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
k Zinc (as Zn) mg/l 5 15 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.08
28 Total Coliform MPN/100ml Shall not be detectable
in any 100 ml sample Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
29 Faecal Coliforms MPN/100ml Shall not be detectable
in any 100 ml sample Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 114
3.9.9 Observations
These are aquifers in the close proximity to sea. These aquifers contain saline water containing high TDS.
Only those wells located near the surface water bodies are yielding relatively good quality water. This is
observed and confirmed from above chemical analysis of groundwater samples collected during field visit.
From this observation it is confirmed that dilution in water quality is likely.
In past most of the wells located near the surface water bodies like pond, streams were in use for drinking
purpose. After commencement of water supply for drinking purpose from Narmada canal/pipeline these
became redundant. The saline water yielded from wells is used for domestic purposes other than drinking
water.
3.10 Hydrology & Geology
This chapter illustrates the description of the existing environmental status of the study area with reference to the
prominent environmental attributes. The study area covers an area equal to 10 km radius around the project site.
The existing environmental setting covers baseline conditions with respect to geology and groundwater quality.
3.10.1 Methodology
The Geology and Ground Water
Collection of existing maps and data
District Resource Map, (Survey of India), if available
CGWB reports
State Groundwater report
IMD data
Land-use maps
Google Earth and/or Topographic maps (drainage patterns, water bodies, topography, morphology and
vegetation cover)
The integrated study of above maps leads to identification of specific issues related to geology and its effect on
topography, morphology, drainage pattern and groundwater. It further gives an idea about water quality i.e.
soluble salts. It further explains relation between surface and ground water.
Based on these inferences field visit, observation points and sampling locations are decided and acted upon.
The objective of studying the geology is to assess and estimate the likely impact of proposed plant on surface and
underground environment.
3.10.2 Topography and Geomorphology
Topographically, the entire area is almost flat with gentle dipping toward west. Geomorphologically the area
belongs to flood plains of Gulf of Khambhat. The average elevation is 6 – 8 m above MSL.
3.10.3 Regional Geology
A concise description of Geology is given by Geological Survey of India is given below:
The stratigraphic sequence as given by Geological Survey of India is given below:
Soils brown sands, younger alluvium Holocene Quaternary
Older alluvium Pleistocene
Agate conglomerate Pleistocene Tertiary
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 115
Jhagadia formation Upper Miocene
Kand formation Middle Miocene
Balaguru formation Lower Miocene
Nummulitive limestone Oligocene
laterite Palaeocene
Deccan trap basalts with dykes Lower Eocene to upper cretaceous
Bagh beds Cretaceous
3.10.4 Geological and Hydrogeological conditions
Dahej GIDC is located on west of Bharuch at Gulf of Khambhat. Geologically, entire area is covered with recent age
deposits of fluvial and marine origin. Major part of the study area is covered with gray to yellow coloured silty
loam.
The main hydrogeological unit in the area is alluvium formation. The alluvium formation mainly comprises of
alternate bands of sand and clay. The sand formation consists of medium to fine-grained material and works as an
aquifer. The ground water in area is highly saline so no efforts are seen to extract ground water.
The groundwater occurrence in this area is under water table and semi-confined. As per discussion with local
people and well owners, depth to water level, within study area is 8 to 10 m and total depth of wells ranging from
15 to 20 m. At site the applicable transmissibility value may ranging from 60-90 m2/day and permeability may range
form 3-6 m/day and specific yield value may range from 3-4%.
3.10.5 Seismicity
Most of Gujarat, which include the study area of the project, is categorized in the seismic zone III, which is
classified as having a fairly high probability of earthquake shocks measuring 5 or 6 on the Richter scale, low
probability of shocks of 6 or 7 on the Richter scale.
Source: www.gujarat.earthquake.gov.in
Earthquake zoning map of Gujarat is shown as Figure 3-5.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 116
Figure 3-5: Earthquake zoning map of Gujarat
Note: Zone V: Very High Risk Zone; Zone IV: High Risk Zone; Zone III: Moderate Risk Zone; Zone II: Low Risk
Zone
3.11 Soil
3.11.1 Introduction
The project area falls under South Gujarat Agroclimatic Zone (GJ-2) and Agro-ecological zone-21, characterized by
700-800 mm rainfall, 1-3 % soil slope and soil depth is >100 cm. The predominantly soils are heavy black (62.52
%), heavy black coastal (14.46 %) and sandy loam (23.12 %). The principal crops grown are cotton, paddy,
sugarcane, sorghum, wheat, pigeon pea and other pulses like wal and green gram. In the project area neither
vegetable are cultivated on large scale nor plantation crops. The irrigation is mainly through canal and open wells
as underground waters are saline due to proximity of sea in the project area. The cropping intensity is 117 %. The
farmers grow rainfed cotton, sorghum, pigeon pea and wheat.
3.11.2 Objectives
To know physical and chemical properties of soils
To identify soil pollution and suggest mitigation measures
To give monitoring plan for improving soil quality
3.11.3 Methodology
A field visit conducted to study site-specific soil quality and condition includes soil colour, texture mineralogical
content, plasticity and any possible impact to the environmental setting due to project
3.11.4 Soil sample collection Methodology
The locations for soil sample collection were randomly selected from the surrounding areas namely Soil-1 to Soil-07.
The soil samples from 0-15 cm depth were collected by using spade and pawada. The samples were homogenized
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 117
and about 1 Kg soil sample was collected in the polyethylene bag. Labelled with sample ID which includes site
numbers and project name. The samples were brought to the laboratory for analysis of physical (porosity, water
holding capacity, permeability, and particle size distribution) and chemical properties (cation exchange, electrical
conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, pH, Ca, Mg, Na, K).
Table 3-23: Soil Sampling Locations
S. No. Sampling Location Sampling date Distance from site (km) Direction w.r.t site
S 1 Galenda 12-05-2017 9.18 NE
S 2 Rahiyad 12-05-2017 7.56 E
S 3 Jolva 12-05-2017 5.77 E
S 4 Vadadala 12-05-2017 4.82 NE
S 5 Koliyad 12-05-2017 9.74 E
3.11.5 Methodology of Soil Sample Analysis
Methodology of soil sample monitoring is given in Table 3-24.
Table 3-24: Methodology of Soil Sample Monitoring
Sampling Parameters Sample collection Analytical Equipment
Methodology Remarks
Porosity
Manual sample collection using hammer and
container tube for collecting undisturbed
top soil.
- IS: 2720 Part 7
Trial pit method for topsoil sample
collection; disturbed samples
Water holding capacity Keen Apparatus HMSO, UK
Permeability - IS: 2720 Part 17
Moisture content Electronic Balance IS: 2720 Part 2
Texture - IS: 2720 Part 4
Particle size Distribution Glass wares IS: 2720 Part 4
5% Leachate to be made and
analyzed as per APHA, “Standard
Methods”
All method numbers are as
per APHA “Standard
Methods” (21st edition, 2005)
Cation Exchange Capacity Centrifuge IS: 2720 Part 24 (1976)
SAR F. Photometer (Na, K)
Titration ( Ca & Mg) Calculation
pH pH Meter 4500 H+B
Electrical Conductivity Conductivity Meter As per IS 14767 -2000
Calcium Glass wares 3500 Ca B
Magnesium Glass Wares 3500 Mg B
Sodium (Na) F. Photometer 3500 Na B
Potassium F. Photometer 3500 K B
3.11.6 Analysis Results of Soil
The soil sampling analysis results are given in Table 3-25.
Table 3-25: Soil Analysis Results
S. No
Parameter Unit S1
Galenda
S2
Rahiyad
S3
Jolva
S4
Vadadala
S5
Koliyad
1 Porosity % 56 48 61 50 49
2 Water Holding Capacity % 53.10 53.20 48.80 61.50 61.30
3 Permeability mm/hr 11.8 20.1 27.1 30.1 22.2
4 Particle Size distribution
a Sand % 36 45 55 42 68
b Silt % 22 13 12 19 13
C Clay % 42 42 33 39 19
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 118
S. No
Parameter Unit S1
Galenda
S2
Rahiyad
S3
Jolva
S4
Vadadala
S5
Koliyad
d Texture -- Clay loam Clay loam Sandy
clay loam Clay loam Sandy loam
5 Cation Exchange
capacity meq/100gm 27 26 20 18 22
6 Electrical Conductivity dS/m 0.371 0.174 0.217 0.252 0.414
7 Exchangeable Sodium % 0.27 0.44 0.04 0.32 1.02
8 pH 7.54 7.48 7.40 7.80 8.15
90 Calcium g/kg 0.16 0.22 0.22 0.16 0.11
10 Magnesium g/kg 0.97 1.18 0.84 0.73 1.15
11 Sodium g/kg 0.71 0.88 0.58 0.65 1.13
12 Potassium g/kg 0.29 0.28 0.17 0.19 0.27
3.11.7 Soil Quality
The analysis of physicochemical properties of soil samples collected from surrounding area indicated that porosity
ranged from 48-61 % and WHC varied from 50.30 – 61.30 %, while permeability ranged from 11.8 -30.1 mm/hr.
The highest porosity and WHC and the moderately low permeability was on account of sandy loam to clay loam
texture of soils. The EC (0.147 - 0.414 dS/m) and ESP (0.04 – 1.1) were well within the safe limits of <0.8 dS/m
and <5.0 %, respectively. The pH ranged from 7.35 – 78.15, indicating that soils do not pose a problem of either
salinity or sodicity. Among water soluble cations predominance of Mg (0.63 to 1.18 g/kg) was seen followed by
sodium (0.39 to 1.13 g/kg), Ca (0.11 to 0.24 g/kg) and K (0.17 to 0.29 g/kg).
3.11.8 Interpretation
Soils in the surrounding areas are having sandy loam to clay loam texture having moderately low permeability and
does not pose problem of either salinity or sodicity at present.
3.12 Ecology and Biodiversity
As a part of EIA, this report represents existing biodiversity status of the project site (core zone) and its
surrounding environ of the project study area (buffer zone of 10 km. radius). Also, an effort has been made to
predict likely impacts of project and its associated activities, and suggests mitigation measures to reduce impacts
on various biological components of the project study area.
3.12.1 Scope, Aim and Objectives
To inventorise floral and faunal components of project area (project site / core zone and buffer zone).
To locate / demarcate and understand ecological setting of the project area in terms of national parks /
wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests / tiger reserve / Eco-sensitive Areas / wetlands etc. within 10 km. radius
from project site (if any).
To identify schedule-I, rare, endemic and endangered species within the project study area and prepare
conservation plan for same.
To identify impact zone and evaluate the likely impact of the proposed project on flora, fauna and
ecological setting of the project study area.
To prepare green belt development plan / conservation plan to mitigate likely impacts and to conserve
ecology and biodiversity.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 119
3.12.2 Study Area
Delineation of the study area
Project Site / Core Zone and Buffer Zone
Project site as a core zone and surrounding 10 km. radius considered as a buffer zone for study.
Ecological Sensitivity / Habitats of the Study Area
Buffer zone encompasses following different ecologically important features within 10 km radius from proposed
project site boundary.
Forest /National Park / Sanctuary
No National Park or Sanctuary falls within buffer zone. However, two Reserve Forest (RF) areas falls in the buffer
zone of the study area i.e. Dahej RF and Lakhigam. These forest areas encompass mainly common species like
Prosopis juliflora (invasive species) and shrubs like Datura metel, Calotropis gigantea and Lantana camera are
common.
Mangroves
Nearest patch of mangrove from the project site boundary falls at a distance of 12.8 km towards WSW direction.
3.12.3 Methodology
Literature Review
Since the proposed project surrounding environ (buffer zone) encompasses various industries, some studies have
been conducted by other agencies to carryout EIA projects. In this report, secondary information on ecology and
biodiversity aspect has been used from following two reports. However, efforts have been made to verify same in
the field and interaction with local people.
1. Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment Report For Special Economic Zone of Dahej SEZ Ltd. located at
Taluka: Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat Appended With Marine Environmental Impact Assessment & Mitigation
Measures For CRA Area (August 2010), Prepared By Ramans Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. SF– 23 & 24,
Camps Corner, Near Auda Garden, Prahaladnagar, Ahmedabad 380 051.
2. EIA, EMP & DMP for Industrial Plant at GIDC Dahej (M/s. SRF Limited), Bharuch District Gujarat (2008),
prepared by Kadam Environmental Consultants, Makarpura GIDC, Vadodara, Gujarat.
3. EIA / EMP and RA / DMP Report for Proposed Surfactants Manufacturing Facility (M/s. Galaxy Surfactants
Limited) at Dahej SEZ-II (June 2014), prepared by Kadam Environmental Consultants, Makarpura GIDC,
Vadodara, Gujarat.
4. EIA Report for Environmental Clearance of Proposed Manufacturing of Chlorinated and Hydrogenated
Derivatives (11000 MTM) for Agro Intermediates Plant at Plot No. D-2/CH/6, Survey No. 843/P, 844/P, 845/P,
850/P, 851/P, 852/P, GIDC Industrial Estate, Town Dahej-II, Tehsil Vagra, District Bharuch.
Field Data Collection / Inventory
Terrestrial Ecology
Since project site falls in the industrial area and no natural vegetation exists at site, efforts have been made to
enlist existing species. The Proposed site is dominated by Prosopis juliflora. Similarly, the buffer zone is mainly
dominated with crop / fallow land while forest area is entirely invaded by an invasive species Prosopis juliflora
(monoculture) which does not require quantification. So, secondary data from various EIA reports have been
extracted and verified through ground surveys.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 120
Threat Assessment Criteria
Indian wild Life Protection Act, 1972, ENVIS Database, IUCN Database, Red Data Book etc.
3.12.4 Terrestrial Ecosystem
Flora
Core Zone / Project site
Project site was reported with six common species of flora / plants; taxonomic account is given in the Table 3-26.
Table 3-26: Floral species reported from the proposed project site / Core Zone
S. No. Habit Species Name Local Name Family
1 Shrub Alhagi maurorum Javaso, Javas Fabaceae
2 Shrub Prosopis chilensis Gando Baval Mimosaceae
3 Shrub Calotropis procera Akado,Aak Asclepiadaceae
4 Herb Cressa cretia Bukan, Un Bakano Convolvulaceae
5 Grass Aleuropus lagopoides khariyu gah Poaceae
6 Grass Cynodon dactylon Dhrab, Dhoob Grass Poaceae
Buffer Zone
Buffer zone has been reported 155 floral species, which includes 53 species of trees (25 families), 30 species of
Shrubs (21 families), 50 species of herbs (27 families), 8 species of grasses (one family) and 14 species of climbers
(6 families). Taxonomic account for all life forms is tabulated in following Table 3-27.
Table 3-27: Flora Reported from Buffer Zone of the Study Area
S. No. Family Botanical Name Common Name
Trees
1 i. Fabaceae Acacia auriculiformis Austrianbaval
2 ii. Fabaceae Acacia leucophloea Hermobaval
3 iii. Fabaceae Acacia nilotica Baval
4 iv. Fabaceae Acacia Senegal Goradiobaval
5 v. Bombacucae Adonsonia digitata Rukhdo Choramli
6 vi. Simaroubaceae Ailanthus excelsa Aurdso
7 vii. Fabaceae Albizia lebbeck Siris
8 viii. Fabaceae Albizia procera Kalo siris
9 ix. Avicenniaceae Avecinnia marina Sundari
10 x. Avicenniaceae Avicennia alba Patcheradi
11 xi. Meliaceae Azadirachta indica Limbado
12 xii. Balanitaceae Balanites aegptica Ingorio
13 xiii. Caricaceae Carica papaya Papaya
14 xiv. Caesalpiniaceae Cassia fistula Garmalo
15 xv. Caesalpiniaceae Cassia siamea Kasid
16 xvi. Casuarinaceae Casuarina equisetifolia Sharu
17 xvii. Arecaceae Cocos nucifera Narial
18 xviii. Caesalpiniaceae Delonix elata Sandsro
19 xix. Caesalpiniaceae Delonix regia Gulmohar
20 xx. Papilionaceae Erythrina variegata Pagario
21 xxi. Myrtaceae Eucalyptus Nilgiri
22 xxii. Moraceae Ficus benghalensis Vad
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 121
S. No. Family Botanical Name Common Name
23 xxiii. Moraceae Ficus racemosa Umaro
24 xxiv. Moraceae Ficus religiosa Piplo
25 xxv. Verbenaceae Gmelina arborea Sevan
26 xxvi. Fabaceae Leucaena leucocephala Subaval
27 xxvii. Anacardiaceae Mangifera indica Keri
28 xxviii. Sapotaceae Manilkara hexandra Rayan
29 xxix. Sapotaceae Manilkara zapota Chikoo
30 xxx. Meliaceae Melia azadirachta Bakan Neem
31 xxxi. Bignoniaceae Millingtonia hortensis Desi Buch
32 xxxii. Moringaceae Moringa oleifera Sargavo
33 xxxiii. Fabaceae Parkinsonia aculeata Rambaval
34 xxxiv. Caesalpiniaceae Peltophorum pterocarpum Sonmukhi, Pila Gulmohar
35 xxxv. Arecaceae Phoenix sylvestris Kajuri
36 xxxvi. Fabaceae Pithecellobium dulce Gorasmli
37 xxxvii. Apocynacea Plumeria rubra Chambo
38 xxxviii. Annonaceae Polylathia longifolia Asopalav
39 xxxix. Papilionaceae Pongamia pinnata Karanj
40 xl. Fabaceae Prosopis cineraria Khijado
41 xli. Fabaceae Prosopis juliflora Gando baval
42 xlii. Euphorbiaceae Ricinus communis Castor, Arundo
43 xliii. Salvadoraceae Salvadora oleoides Mithi Jar
44 xliv. Salvadoraceae Salvadora persica Pilva, Piludi
45 xlv. Caesalpiniaceae Sesbania sesban Shesri
46 xlvi. Myrtaceae Syzygium cumini Jambu
47 xlvii. Caesalpiniaceae Tamarindus indica Amli
48 xlviii. Verbenaceae Tectona grandis Sag
49 xlix. Combretaceae Terminalia catappa Badam
50 l. Malvaceae Thespesia populnea Paras piplo
51 li. Verbenaceae Vitex negundo Nagod
52 lii. Rhamnaceae Zizyphus glabrata Bor
53 liii. Rhamnaceae Zizyphus mauritiana Chani Bor
Shrubs
54 i. Acanthaceae Hygrophila auriculata Akhro
55 ii. Apocynaceae Nerium indicum Lalkaren
56 iii. Apocynaceae Thevetia peruviana Pili karan
57 iv. Asclepediaceae Calotropis gigantea Safed Ankdo
58 v. Asclepediaceae Calotropis procera Ankdo
59 vi. Balanitaceae Balanites aegyptiaca Ingorio
60 vii. Bignoniaceae Tecoma stans Peilafol
61 viii. Cactaceae Opuntia elatior Fafdo Thor
62 ix. Caesalpiniaceae Cassia auriculata Tarwar, Awala
63 x. Capparidaceae Capparis decidua Kerdo, Ker
64 xi. Compositae Xanthium strumarium Gokhru
65 xii. Convolvulaceae Ipomoea fistulosa Nasarmo, Besharam vel
66 xiii. Euphorbiaceae Euphorbia neriifolia Thor
67 xiv. Euphorbiaceae Jatropha curcas Ratanjot
68 xv. Euphorbiaceae Jatropha gossypifolia Pardesi Devalo
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 122
S. No. Family Botanical Name Common Name
69 xvi. Euphorbiaceae Ricinus communis Devalo
70 xvii. Alhagi maurorum Javaso, Javas Fabaceae
71. xviii. Lythraceae Lawsonia inermis Mendhi
72. xix. Malvaceae Abelomoschus manihot Jagali bhindi
73. xx. Malvaceae Abutilon indicum Khapat, Kanski
74. xxi. Malvaceae Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Jasund
75. xxii. Mimosaceae Prosopis juliflora Gando baval
76. xxiii. Musaceae Musa paradisiaca Kela
77. xxiv. Nyctaginaceae Bougainvillea spectabilis Bougainvel
78. xxv. Papilionaceae Sesbania sesban Shevari
79. xxvi. Rhamnaceae Zizyphus nummularia Chanibor, Bor
80. xxvii. Solanaceae Datura metel Daturo
81. xxviii. Solanaceae Solanum incanum Ubhi ringan
82. xxix. Verbenaceae Clerodendrum inerme Madhi
83. xxx. Verbenaceae Lantana camara Ganthai
Herbs
84. i. Amaranthaceae Achyranthes aspera Anthedi
85. ii. Amaranthaceae Aerva javanica Bur, Gorakh Ganjo
86. iii. Liliaceae Aloe barbadensis Kunvarpato
87. iv. Amaranthaceae Alternanthera sessilis Jar Bhaji, Jar Bhangaro
88. v. Amaranthaceae Amaranthus viridis Adbau Rajgaro, Rajgaro
89. vi. Lythraceae Ammannia baccifera Jal Agiyo
90. vii. Apiaceae Anethum graveolens Suva
91. viii. Papaveraceae Argemone mexicana Darudi
92. ix. Scrophulariaceae Bacopa monnieri Brahmi
93. x. Asteraceae Blumea lacera Kolhar, Pilo Kapurio
94. xi. Nyctaginaceae Boerhavia diffusa Satodi
95. xii. Caesalpiniaceae Cassia tora Kuvandio
96. xiii. Amaranthaceae Celosia argentea Lampdi
97. xiv. Capparidaceae Cleome gynandra Ghandhatu, Dholi Talwani
98. xv. Tilaceae Corchorus aestuans Kag Shing, Chunch, Chhadhari
99. xvi. Papilionaceae Cortalaria medicaginea Ran methi
100. xvii. Convolvulaceae Cressa cretica Khariyu
101. xviii. Cyperaceae Cyperus bulbosus Kal
102. xix. Cyperaceae Cyperus difformis --
103. xx. Cyperaceae Cyperus rotundus Bara-nagar-motha, Korehi-jhar
104. xxi. Cyperaceae Cyperus stoloniferus --
105. xxii. Solanaceae Datura innoxia Dhatura
106. xxiii. Asteraceae Echinops echinatus Shulio, Utkanto
107. xxiv. Asteraceae Ecipta alba Bhangro
108. xxv. Asteraceae Eclipta prostrata Bhangro
109. xxvi. Pontederiaceae Eichhornia crassipes Kanphutti
110. xxvii. Boraginaceae Heliotropium indicum Hathisundhi
111. xxviii. Acanthaceae Hygrophila auriculata Kanta shelio
112. xxix. Papilionaceae Indigofera oblongifolia Zil
113. xxx. Asteraceae Launaea procumbens --
114. xxxi. Molluginaceae Mollugo pentaphylla --
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 123
S. No. Family Botanical Name Common Name
115. xxxii. Nymphaeaceae Nymphaea pubescens Kamal
116. xxxiii. Nymphaeaceae Nymphaea stellata Kamal
117. xxxiv. Lamiaceae ( Labiatae) Ocimum basilicum damaro
118. xxxv. Lamiaceae ( Labiatae) Ocimum sanctum Tuli
119. xxxvi. Asteraceae Pentanema indicum Sonasali
120. xxxvii. Poaceae (Gramineae) Phragmites karaka --
121. xxxviii. Asteraceae Pulicaria wightiana Sonela
122. xxxix. Malvaceae Sida cordifolia Bala
123. xl. Solanaceae Solanum surattense Bhoringini
124. xli. Asteraceae Spheranthus indicus Gorakh mundi
125. xlii. Chenopodiaceae Suaeda nudiflora Moras
126. xliii. Chenopodiaceae Sueda fruticosa --
127. xliv. Aziaceae Trianthema monogyna Satodo
128. xlv. Zygophyllaceae Tribulus terrestris Gokhru
129. xlvi. Boraginaceae Trichodesma indicum Undha fuli
130. xlvii. Asteraceae Tricholepis amplexicaulis --
131. xlviii. Asteraceae Tridax procumbens Pardesi bhangro
132. xlix. Typhaceae Typha angustata Gha-Bajariyu
133. l. Asteraceae Vernonia cineraria Sahdevi
Grasses
134. i. Poaceae (Gramineae) Aleuropus lagopoides khariyu gah
135. ii. Poaceae Apluda mutica Phophal
136. iii. Poaceae Aristida sps. Lapdu
137. iv. Poaceae Cenchrus biflorus Dhaman
138. v. Poaceae Chloris barbata Bidelpuchh
139. vi. Poaceae (Gramineae) Cynodon dactylon Dhrab, Dhoob Grass
140. vii. Poaceae Dactylotenium indicum Tarakiyu
141. viii. Poaceae Heteropogon contortus Kagadiu
Climbers
142. i. Asclepediaceae Pergularia daemia Chamar dudheli
143. ii. Convolvulaceae Ipomoea pes-caprae Dariani vel
144. iii. Convolvulaceae Ipomoea pes-tigridis wagpadi
145. iv. Convolvulaceae Ipomoea aquatica Nali ni Bhaji
146. v. Convolvulaceae Ipomoea nil Kaladana
147. vi. Convolvulaceae Ipomoea obscura Vad fudardi
148. vii. Convolvulaceae Merremia emarginata Undarkani
149. viii. Cucurbataceae Trichosanthes cucumerina Jungli parval
150. ix. Cucurbataceae Citrulus colocynthis Indravarna
151. x. Cucurbataceae Coccinia grandis Ghiloda
152. xi. Cucurbataceae Luffa cylindrica Galku
153. xii. Cuscutaceae Cuscuta chinensis Amarval
154. xiii. Menispermaceae Cocculus hirsutus Vevdi
155. xiv. Vitaceae Vitis trifolia Khachatumbo
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 124
Fauna
Herpetofauna
Core Zone / Project Site
No herpetofauna reported from the project site.
Buffer Zone
Overall 8 herpetofaunal species have been reported from the buffer zone.
Table 3-28: Herpetofauna Reported from Buffer Zone
S. No. Family Common Name Scientific Name IWPA-1972 & IUCN
1 Agamidae Common garden lizard Calotes versicolor
2 Colubridae Common rat snake Ptyas mucosus Schedule-IV
3 Gekkonidae Yellow-Green House Gecko Hemidactylus flaviviridis --
4 Agamidae Fan-Throated Lizard Sitana ponticeriana LC
5 Elapidae Spectacled cobra Naja naja Schedule-II
6 Viperidae Russell’s Viper Daboia russelii Schedule-II, LC
7 Elapidae Common Indian Krait Bungarus caeruleus Schedule-IV, LRnt
Avifauna
Core Zone
Only 4 common species of birds were reported from the project site (flying across site). Bird activity was very poor
in adjacent area.
Table 3-29: Avifauna Reported from Core Zone / Project Site
S. No. Family New Common Name Scientific Name IWPA-1972 Schedule
1 Ardeidae Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis Schedule-IV, LC
2 Sylviidae Common Babbler Turdoides caudatus Schedule-IV, LC
3 Corvidae House Crow Corvus splendens Schedule-IV, LC
4 Pycnonotidae Red-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer Schedule-IV, LC
Buffer Zone
Overall 47 species of birds from 24 families have been reported from the buffer zone area.
Table 3-30: Birds Reported from Buffer Zone
S. No. Family New Common Name Scientific Name IWPA-1972 Schedule
1 Cuculidae Asian Koel Eudynamys scolopacea Schedule-IV, LC
2 Sturnidae Bank Myna Acridotheres ginginianus Schedule-IV, LC
3 Corvidae Black Drongo Dicrurus macrocercus Schedule-IV, LC
4 Accipitridae Black-winged Kite Elanus caeruleus Schedule-IV, LC
5 Charadriidae Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus Schedule-IV, LC
6 Meropidae Blue-cheeked Bee-eater Merops persicus Schedule-IV, LC
7 Ardeidae Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis Schedule-IV, LC
8 Meropidae Chestnut-headed Bee-
eater Meropsles chenaulti Schedule-IV, LC
9 Sylviidae Common Babbler Turdoides caudatus Schedule-IV, LC
10 Sturnidae Common Myna Acridotheres tristis Schedule-IV, LC
11 Corvidae Common Raven Corvus corax Schedule-IV, LC
12 Apodidae Common Swift Apus apus Schedule-IV, LC
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 125
S. No. Family New Common Name Scientific Name IWPA-1972 Schedule
13 Sylviidae Common Tailorbird Orthotomus sutorius Schedule-IV, LC
14 Nectariniidae Crimson-backed Sunbird Nectarinia minima Schedule-IV, LC
15 Cuculidae Drongo Cuckoo Surniculus lugubris Schedule-IV, LC
16 Columbidae Eurasian Collared-Dove Streptope liadecaocto Schedule-IV, LC
17 Corvidae Eurasian Golden-Oriole Oriolus oriolus Schedule-IV, LC
18 Paridae Great Tit Parus major Schedule-IV, LC
19 Centropodidae Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis Schedule-IV, LC
20 Phasianidae Grey Francolin Francolinus pondicerianus Schedule-IV, LC
21 Corvidae House Crow Corvus splendens Schedule-IV, LC
22 Passeridae House Sparrow Passer domesticus Schedule-IV, LC
23 Phasianidae Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus Schedule-I, LC
24 Ardeidae Indian Pond-Heron Ardeo lagrayii Schedule-IV, LC
25 Muscicapidae Indian Robin Saxicoloides fulicata Schedule-IV, LC
26 Ardeidae Intermediate Egret Mesophoyx intermedia Schedule-IV, LC
27 Sylviidae Jungle Babbler Turdoides striatus Schedule-IV, LC
28 Corvidae Large Cuckoo-shrike Coracina macei Schedule-IV, LC
29 Ardeidae Little Egret Egretta garzetta Schedule-IV, LC
30 Apodidae Little Swift Apus affinis Schedule-IV, LC
31 Laniidae Long-tailed Shrike Lanius schach Schedule-IV, LC
32 Laniidae Northern Shrike Lanius excubitor Schedule-IV, LC
33 Columbidae Oriental Turtle-Dove Streptope liaorientalis Schedule-IV, LC
34 Ciconiidae Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala NT
35 Muscicapidae Pied Bushchat Saxicola caprata Schedule-IV, LC
36 Nectariniidae Purple Sunbird Nectarinia asiatica Schedule-IV, LC
37 Threskiornithidae Red-naped Ibis Pseudibis papillosa Schedule-IV, LC
38 Pycnonotidae Red-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer Schedule-IV, LC
39 Charadriidae Red-wattled Lapwing Vanellus indicus Schedule-IV, LC
40 Pycnonotidae Red-whiskered Bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus Schedule-IV, LC
41 Columbidae Rock Pigeon Columba livia Schedule-IV, LC
42 Psittacidae Rose-ringed Parakeet Psittacula krameri Schedule-IV, LC
43 Corvidae RufousTreepie Dendrocitta vagabunda Schedule-IV, LC
44 Columbidae Spotted Dove Streptope liachinensis Schedule-IV, LC
45 Strigidae Spotted Owlet Athene brama Schedule-IV, LC
46 Rallidae White-breasted Water
hen Amaurornis phoenicurus Schedule-IV, LC
47 Dacelonidae White-throated
Kingfisher Halcyon smyrnensis Schedule-IV, LC
Mammals
Core Zone
No direct or indirect evidences of mammals were reported from the site.
Buffer Zone
Totally 9 species from six families have been enlisted from buffer zone of the study area.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 126
Table 3-31: Mammals Reported from the Buffer Zone
S. No. Family Common Name Scientific name IWPA-1972 & IUCN
1 Cercopithecidae Common Langur Semnopithecus entellus Schedule-II, LC
2 Canidae Indian Fox Vulpes bengalensis Schedule-II, LC
3 Felidae Jungle cat Felis chaus Schedule-II, LC
4 Herpestidae Common Mongoose Herpestes edwardsii Schedule-IV, LC
5 Leporids Indian Hare Lepus nigricollis Schedule-IV, LC
6 Muridae Indian field mouse Mus booduga Schedule-V, LC
7 Muridae Black rat Rattus Rattus Schedule-V, LC
8 Sciuridae Five striped Palm squirrel Funambulus pennantii Schedule-IV, LC
9 ciuridae Nilgai Boselaphus tragocamelus Schedule-III, LC
3.12.5 Agriculture and Horticulture
The Tuver (Cajanus indica), Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Cotton (Gossypium herbaceum) are cultivated as major
crops in this area. Bajra (Pennisetum typhoides) and Jowar (Sorghum bicolar) are cultivated in few pockets
immediately after monsoon period.
Major Crops: Major crops in the study area are Tuver (Cajanus indica), Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Cotton
(Gossypium herbaceum).
Minor crops: The minor crops of this region are Bajra (Pennisetum typhoides), Jowar (Sorghum bicolar) and Divel
(Ricinus communis)
Vegetables: The vegetables grown in the study area are, Rigan (Solanum melongena), Tomato (Lycopersicon
lycopersicum) and Val, Valpapadi (Lablab purpureus).
Major horticultural crops: Horticulture activity is very less. Keri (Mangifera indica), Chikoo (Manilkara zapota),
Papaya (Carica papaya) and Banana (Musa Paradisiaca).
3.12.6 Aquatic Ecosystem
Status of fishery and mangroves of the study area buffer zone is described as follows,
Fishery: Marine and Narmada Estuary
Bharuch District contributes less than 1% to the total state marine production. Bombay duck (Harpadon nehereus)
constitutes the dominant fishery (13%) of the region of the total marine catch. The coastal water also serves as the
migratory route for the clupeid Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) on their way to the Narmada River for breeding and the
outward route for the newly hatched juveniles and some of the adults. This makes Hilsa fishery an important
activity inside the Gulf and the estuarine region of Narmada.
Water near confluence is heavily silted and turbid. No commercial fishery takes place in river or along the coast due
to strong water currents. Pagadiya type fishing is operational in intertidal zones. Very few fishing boats present are
seen in the coastal villages which operate only during rainy season when large fishes are available.
Mangrove and Other Costal Vegetation
Mangrove flora is dominated by Avicennia marina and Rhizophora mucronata. Healthy growth of mangroves has
been reported from the banks of Ban Khadi and Ghugar Khadi. However, no mudflats sustaining dense growth of
mangroves have been reported. Similarly, obligate halophytes like Sueda maritima and Salichornia brachyata are
very common in the coastal area. Photographs of Mangroves are given in Annexure 12.
3.13 Socio-Economics
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 127
3.13.1 Demographic Profile
There is around 17 villages/hamlets/habitation within the entire study area. The proposed project is falling within
the Dahej GIDC, where there is presence of already several chemical industries. The villages which may come in
direct impact zone are Ambheta, Dahej, Jageshwar, Luvara and Lakhigam. The list of identified villages in the study
area with households and population are reflected in Table 3-32.
Table 3-32: Villages in Study Area with Households and Population
S. No. District Sub- district Distance (Km) Habitation House Hold Population
1 Bharuch Vagara 0 - 3 Ambheta 347 1,552
2 Bharuch Vagara 0 - 3 Dahej 3,426 13,495
3 Bharuch Vagara 0 - 3 Jageshwar 383 1,571
Sub Total 4,156 16,618
4 Bharuch Vagara 3 - 5 Luvara 385 1,663
5 Bharuch Vagara 3 - 5 Lakhigam 1,217 4,938
6 Bharuch Vagara 3 - 5 Vadadla 201 822
Sub Total 1,803 7,423
7 Bharuch Vagara 5 - 7 Suva 413 1,920
8 Bharuch Vagara 5 - 7 Jolva 338 1,442
9 Bharuch Vagara 5 - 7 Vajapura - -
Sub Total 751 3,362
10 Bharuch Vagara 7 - 10 Padariya 131 647
11 Bharuch Vagara 7 - 10 Kadodara 420 1995
12 Bharuch Vagara 7 - 10 Vav 155 727
13 Bharuch Vagara 7 - 10 Sambheti 82 416
14 Bharuch Vagara 7 - 10 Samatpor 79 367
15 Bharuch Vagara 7 - 10 Galenda 120 611
16 Bharuch Vagara 7 - 10 Rahiad 355 1694
17 Bharuch Vagara 7 - 10 Koliad 152 676
Sub Total 1,494 7,133
Grand Total 8,204 34,536
Source: Primary Census Abstract 2011
Note: Vajapur habitation details is absent in PCA-2011.
According to Primary Census Abstract-2011 there is around 8,204 households and 34,536 population in the study
area. During social survey it was revealed that number of households are increasing at Dahej, Ambheta Lakhigam
etc. the probable reason may due to rapid in immigration rate the demand might have increased.
3.13.2 Social Profile
Population and Sex ratio details
The statistics regarding the population and sex ration of the study area are given in Table 3-33.
Table 3-33: Population and Sex ratio details in 2011
Distance in km Male Female Sex Ratio
0 -3 9,970 6,648 2461
3 - 5 4,436 2,987 673
5 - 7 1,780 1,582 889
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 128
Distance in km Male Female Sex Ratio
7 - 10 3,641 3,492 959
Total 19,827 14,709 742
Source: Primary Census Abstract2011
From the socio-economic study it can be revealed that the study area consists of 17 census villages/habitations.
Total Population of study area is 34,536. Out of the total population, male are 19,827(57.40%) and female
population is 14,709(42.60%) and the sex ratio is 742 females per 1000 males in the study area.
Social Characteristics
The prominent caste prevailing in 0-3 Km villages are Patel, Darbar along with SC/ST population. The statistics
regarding the Social Characteristics of villages in the study area are given in Table 3-34.
Table 3-34: Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Population in 2011
Distance in km
2011
% SC % ST
Total Male Female Total Male Female
0 - 3 3.77 51.67 48.33 15.03 52.34 47.66
3 - 5 3.66 53.31 46.69 25.43 50.95 49.05
5 - 7 8.98 54.64 45.36 16.45 52.62 47.38
7 - 10 3.81 50.00 50.00 19.75 49.68 50.32
Total 3.17 51.87 48.13 15.79 51.40 48.60
Source: Primary Census Abstract 2011
As per census 2011 average scheduled caste population in Study area is 3.17% of the total population. Out of the
total SC population, males are 51.87% and female population is 48.13 %. In case of scheduled tribe the population
15.79% of the total population. Out of the total ST population, male are 51.40% and female population is 48.60%.
Literacy Rate in Study Area
The statistics regarding the literacy rate in the study area are given in Table 3-35.
Table 3-35: Literacy Rate in Study Area in 2011
Distance in km % Literacy
Total Male Female
0 - 3 75.12 64.59 35.41
3 - 5 77.66 63.87 36.13
5 - 7 74.42 57.71 42.29
7 - 10 73.64 56.10 43.90
Total 66.31 62.72 37.28
Source: Primary Census Abstract 2011
According to Census of India 2011, it is calculated that average literacy rate of the study area in 2011 is 66.31%.
Out of total Literate population male literacy is 62.72% and female literacy is 37.28% of total population.
3.13.3 Basic Infrastructure Facility
Education Facility
In the study area it was observed that the each village has school up to primary level whether government or
private. For further education students have to travel to nearby town like Dahej, and Bharuch. The basic
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 129
infrastructure of school is in fair condition. The quality of education and teachers are good. The education facilities
that are prevailing in the study area are shown in Table 3-36.
Table 3-36 : Education Facility
Distance in km
Government Private
Primary School
Secondary School
Senior Secondary
School College
Primary School
Secondary School
Senior Secondary
School College
0- 3 4 2 1 1 1 - - -
3 - 5 3 - - - - - - -
5 - 7 2 - - - - - - -
7 - 10 8 1 - - - - - -
Total 17 3 1 1 1 - - -
Source: Primary Census Abstract 2011
According to primary census abstract 2011 it is revealed that the pre-primary school and middle schools are absent
in the study area. There are 18 primary school (17 Govt. + 1 private), 3 secondary, 1 senior secondary and 1
college in the study area.
Medical and Health Facility
According to Census Data 2011, in the study area villages TB Clinic, Dispensary, Community Health Centre,
Maternity and Child Welfare Centre, Allopathic Hospital, Mobile Health Clinic and Family Welfare Centre is absent.
To avail the better medical facility they have to visit Amod/Vagra taluka or Bharuch for better medical services. The
medical facilities available in the study area are shown in Table 3-37.
Table 3-37: Medical Facility
Distance in km Primary Health
Centre Primary Health
Sub Centre Veterinary Hospital
Non-Government Medical facilities Out Patient
0 - 3 1 1 1 8
3 - 5 - 1 - 3
5 - 7 - 1 - 2
7 - 10 - - - -
Total 1 3 1 13
Source: Primary Census Abstract 2011
During field survey few medical stores or maternity hospital were observed at Amod and Vagara taluka. The DHWS
Hospital is the newly built multi-speciality available at Dahej GIDC. The Jubilant and Grasim industries are providing
medical support at regular interval through CSR.
Source of Drinking Water
The main source of water are untreated tape water, tube well /Bore well, Open Wells, Panchayat’ s Overhead
Water tank, ponds etc. The drinking water is supplied through WASMO projects in villages of study area.
Table 3-38: Medical Facility
Distance in km
Tap Water Untreated
Covered Well
Uncovered Well
Hand Pump
Tube Wells/ Borehole
River/ Canal
Tank/ Pond/
Lake Others
0 - 3 √ √ √ × √ √ √ ×
3 - 5 √ √ √ × √ √ √ ×
5 - 7 √ × √ √ × × √ ×
7 - 10 √ × √ √ × × √ √
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 130
Source: Primary Census Abstract, 2011
During the field survey it found that the well and tank facilities are sufficiently present in the study area villages but
the water requirement of the village is not adequately supported because of it being saline unsuitable for the
drinking purpose. According to field survey Tube well or Borehole facility is absent in the 7-10 kms villages of study
area. The cultivators totally depend on rain water for the agricultural purpose. In the villages falling in the close
proximity of the proposed project site the drinking water is supplied through pipe line and water tanker provided by
GIDC.
Means of Communication
The table below shows the means of communication in the study area.
Table 3-39: Communication Facility
Distance in km
Post Office
Sub- Post office
Telephone (landlines)
Public Call Office /Mobile
(PCO)
Mobile Phone
Coverage
Internet Cafes / Common Service
Centre (CSC)
Private Courier Facility
0 - 3 √ √ √ √ √ √ √
3 - 5 × √ √ √ √ √ ×
5 - 7 × √ √ × √ √ ×
7 - 10 × √ √ √ √ √ ×
Source: Primary Census Abstract, 2011
The villages have adequate communication facilities in form of post office, post & telegraph and phone. Many
villagers have telephonic connections. However, people now also own mobile phones, which has become a
necessity, for quick and easy communication.
Transportation Facility
The internal villages of the study area is well connected. The proximity to the national highway (Delhi Mumbai
Industrial Corridor) shall provide easy access to the targeted destination of its product. The nearest airport from the
proposed project site is Surat and Vadodara Airport.
Table 3-40: Transport Facility
Distance in km Bus Service Railway
Station Autoricksaw Taxi
Government Private
0 - 3 √ × √ √ √
3 - 5 √ × × √ ×
5 - 7 √ × × √ ×
7 - 10 √ × × √ ×
Source: Primary Census Abstract, 2011
Internal Infrastructural
The project site is well connected by 4-lane internal road network, street lights, plantations, water supply and
power supply distribution network, CC storm water drainage system
3.13.4 Economic Profile
Agriculture Condition in Study Area
Agriculture is totally depended on monsoons in the study area. The major crops grown are Wheat, Cotton, Pulses
and Bajri. Agriculture provides employment in the form of daily wage labour during the harvesting season. People
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 131
who have less or no land do labour in others field on daily wage basis. The average wage for the male is Rs. 250
per day and for the female is Rs. 200 per day.
Animal Husbandry & Poultry
Livestock rearing profession is also followed in some parts of the study area. Most of the animals tamed by them
are cows, buffaloes, goats, bullock etc. Even the poultry profession is also followed at few places.
Industries/Factories
PCPIR located at Dahej, is spread over the blocks of Vagra and Bharuch, South Gujarat. The major company
existing in GIDC Dahej Phase II are Reliance, OPAL, ONGC, GACL, HINDALCO, LANXESS, Welspun, GAIL, BASF,
GSPC, SRF,GCPTCL, ABG Shipyard, Jubilant, Torrent, GSFC, Pidilite, Adani Power, GFL, Meghmani, Indofils etc.
Occupational Pattern
The statistics regarding the Occupational Pattern in the study area are given in Table 3-41.
Table 3-41: Occupation Patterns
Distance in km
% Occupational Status (2011)
Total Working Population
Cultivators Agricultural
Labour Household Workers
Others Marginal Workers
0-3 37.52 2.11 0.25 1.15 79.93 16.56
3-5 42.13 1.80 1.54 0.41 91.49 4.76
5-7 34.15 7.91 10.22 0.35 58.15 23.37
7-10 36.63 29.12 12.36 0.65 30.54 27.32
Total 38.02 8.04 4.08 0.77 70.76 16.35
Source: Primary Census Abstract 2011
According to Census Data 2011, there is 16.35% marginal workers, 0.77% household workers, 4.08% agricultural
labour and 8.04% cultivators. About 38.02% are the total working population out total population of study area.
During field survey it could be revealed that due to rapid industrialization cultivation occupation is decreasing day
by day
3.13.5 Historical and Cultural Profile
In the study area there is no Archaeological or Historical sites except few temples at Dahej, Jageshwar, Lakhigam,
considered to be the places of religious importance for the local people.
Village life has always been the resemblance of simple society, informal relations, traditional livelihood patterns and
contented lives. The socio-economic changes are evident in progressive industrial development that is trans versing
the whole of the developing nations.
Photographs of infrastructure, medical facility, animal husbandry, agriculture fields, FGD, etc. is included in
Annexure 12.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 132
4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION
MEASURES
4.1 Introduction
Objective of this chapter is to:
Identify project activities that could beneficially or adversely impact the environment
Predict and assess the environmental impacts of such activities
Examine each environmental aspect-impact relationship in detail and identify its degree of significance
Identify possible mitigation measures for these project activities and select the most appropriate mitigation
measure, based on the reduction in significance achieved and practicality in implementation.
4.2 Details of Investigated Environmental Impacts
4.2.1 Methodology of Impact Assessment
Key Definitions
Environmental Aspects
These are elements of an organization’s activities or products or services that can interact with the environment.
Environmental aspects could include activities that occur during normal, abnormal and emergency operations.
Environmental aspects selected for further study should be large enough for meaningful examination and small
enough to be easily understood.
Environmental Impacts
Environmental impacts are defined as any change to the environment, whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or
partially resulting from an organization’s environmental aspects.
Environmental Indices
The environment includes surroundings in which an organization operates such as air, water, land, natural
resources, flora, fauna, humans and their interrelation.
The environmental indices (or parts of the receiving environment on which impacts are being assessed) include:
Land use/land cover, air quality, noise quality, surface water environment, ground water environment, soil, ecology
and bio diversity, socio economics, occupational health, community health and safety
After the identification of impacting activities, impacts require to be assessed based on subjective / objective criteria
to assess the impacting activities. This is done in the following steps.
Identification of Impacts
This entails employing a simple checklist method requiring:
1. Listing of environmental aspects (i.e. activities or parts thereof that can cause environmental impacts)
2. Identifying applicable components of the environment on which the environmental aspects can cause an
environmental impact
3. Making notes of the reason / possible inter-relationships that lead to environmental impact creation
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 133
4. Listing the environmental components likely to receive impacts, along with the key impacting activities on each
component.
Component Wise Environment Risk Assessment and Mitigation
A component wise approach to environmental risk assessment and mitigation is now applied. For each
environmental component this is carried through a series of steps as follows.
Step 1: Review and Assessment of the Specific Aspects Generating Environmental Risk
Several scientific techniques and methodologies are also used to predict impacts on the environment. Mathematical
models are useful tools (where applicable) to quantitatively describe the cause and effect relationships between
sources of pollution and different components of environment. In cases where it is not possible to identify and
validate a model for a particular situation, predictions have been arrived based on logical reasoning / consultation /
extrapolation or overlay methods. In any case, for each component of the environment, the methods used to arrive
at the likely impacts require to be described.
Step 2: Quantifying the Environmental Risk, Identifying Aspects Causing Unacceptable Levels of Risk
and Prioritizing Aspects Requiring Mitigation Measures
Once a general understanding of the impacts has been studied and understood, efforts are made to compare
different impacts so as to prioritize mitigation measures, focusing on those impacting activities (i.e. aspects) that
require urgent mitigation. For ease of comparison across different activities, a summary environmental risk score is
calculated. Two key elements are taken into consideration based on standard environmental risk assessment
methodologies:
Severity / consequence: The resultant effect of an activity and its interaction with the physical, biological and/or
socio-economic environments
Probability: The likelihood that an impact may occur due to the project activity/aspect
A combination of severity / consequence with probability gives a reasonable measure of environmental risk, which
aids in decision making. It must always be kept in mind that any scoring methodology howsoever well-defined is
subjective and different persons can arrive at different impact risk scores based on their understanding / opinion.
Therefore end results should be evaluated against past experience, professional judgment as well as project and
activity specific conditions to ensure adequacy and equity. Kadam has made an effort to ensure that the scoring
does not change significantly assuming that different evaluators are equally well informed on the project as well as
knowledgeable on the concerned issues. The steps in identifying environmental risk is as follows.
1. Scoring the Overall Impact Severity / Consequence
The consequences on various environmental receptors have been ranked into 5 levels ranging from insignificant to
catastrophic consequence and are given in Table 4-1.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 134
Table 4-1: Overall Impact Scoring System due to Proposed Project – Consequence Assessment
S. No.
Environmental Component Impacted
Impact and Score5
Insignificant Consequence
(+/-) 1 point
Minor Consequence
(+/-) 2 points
Moderate Consequence
(+/-) 3 points
Major
Consequence
(+/-) 4 points
Catastrophic Consequence
(+/-) 5 points
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
1 Landuse / Landcover
Very short term (< 3 months) and reversible
change in landuse and / or landcover
Short term (3 months – 1 year) and reversible change in landuse and / or landcover
Medium term (1 - 3 years) and reversible change in
landuse and / or landcover
Long term (>3 years) irreversible change in
landuse and / or landcover
Permanent and irreversible adverse change in landuse
and / or landcover
2 Air Quality
Temporary nuisance due to controlled/uncontrolled
release of air emissions, odor / dust or greenhouse gases
Minor environmental impact due to
controlled/uncontrolled release of air emissions, odor / dust or greenhouse gases with no lasting detrimental
effects
Moderate environmental impact due to
controlled/uncontrolled release of air emissions, odor / dust or greenhouse gases leading to visual impacts, at significant nuisance levels
Significant environmental impact due to release of air emissions, odor / dust or
greenhouse gases leading to exceeding of limits specified
in EP Rules’
Unacceptable environmental impact due to release of air
emissions, odor / dust leading to possibility of
chronic / acute health issues, injuries or fatalities
3
Ambient Noise - give the mean score from the three categories,
rounded to the nearest decimal
Background Noise Levels, with respect to Applicable Limit6 as per The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, as Measured at Boundary of Relevant Noise Generating Unit
<10% or more Between <10 to <5% <5% or the limit Upto 5% above the limit >5% above the limit
Incremental Noise Levels, as Predicted at Boundary of Relevant Noise Generating Unit
1 dB(A) or less 1 dB(A) – 2 dB(A) 2 dB(A) – 3 dB(A) 3 dB(A) – 4 dB(A) 4 dB(A) or more
Incremental Noise Levels, as Predicted at Boundary of Nearest Human Settlement / Sensitive Receptor from Boundary of Relevant Noise Generating Unit
0.5 dB(A) or less 0.5 dB(A) – 1 dB(A) 1 dB(A) – 1.5 dB(A) 1.5 dB(A) – 2 dB(A) 2 dB(A) or more
4
Surface Water - give the mean score from the three categories,
rounded to the nearest decimal
Water Consumption (KL/D)
< 50 51 – 100 101 - 250 250 – 500 501 and more
Water Consumption, Duration
< 1 year 1 – 3 years 3 – 5 years 5 – 10 years 10 years or more
Wastewater Discharge Quality
5 In case none of the impacts are applicable, then Not Applicable (NA) is written in the appropriate cell
6 For leq (day) or leq (night), whichever is higher
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 135
S. No.
Environmental Component Impacted
Impact and Score5
Insignificant Consequence
(+/-) 1 point
Minor Consequence
(+/-) 2 points
Moderate Consequence
(+/-) 3 points
Major
Consequence
(+/-) 4 points
Catastrophic Consequence
(+/-) 5 points
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
No wastewater generation Zero Discharge7 Discharge to an authorized,
functional CETP Other discharge within limits
specified by the EP Rules
Other discharge, outside limits specified by the EP
Rules
5
Ground Water - give the mean score from the three categories,
rounded to the nearest decimal
Location of Drawl, as per CGWA / CGWB Regulations
Safe Semi-critical Critical Over-exploited Notified
Water Drawl (KL/D)
< 50 51 – 100 101 - 250 250 – 500 501 and more
Water Drawl, Duration
< 1 year 1 – 3 years 3 – 5 years 5 – 10 years 10 years or more
Wastewater Discharge Quality
No wastewater generation Zero Discharge Discharge to an authorized,
functional CETP Other discharge within limits
specified by the EP Rules
Other discharge, outside limits specified by the EP
Rules
Accidental Discharge
Negligible leakages of chemicals/oil that only
require periodic maintenance for both storage / transport
routes
Minor but frequent leakages of chemicals/oil that require provision safety measures and proper maintenance
Moderate leakages of chemicals/oil that may
contaminate groundwater if proper safety measures not
provided
Major leakages of chemicals/oil that
contaminate groundwater if safety measures not
provided
Heavy leakage that can adversely contaminate groundwater and must
require urgent remediation actions
6 Soil Quality
Loss of upto 20% topsoil, or minor contamination of soil that can be easily restored
close to original condition for volume <10 m3
Loss of upto 40% topsoil, or actual or possible
contamination of soil volume <25 m3 but belowDutch
Intervention Values
Loss of upto 60% topsoil, or actual or possible
contamination of soil volume <25 m3 but aboveDutch
Intervention Values
Loss upto 80% topsoil, or actual or possible
contamination of soil volume >25 m3 and above Dutch
Intervention Values, but not deemed to require urgent
remediation
Loss upto 100% topsoil, or actual or possible
contamination of soil volume >25 m3 and above Dutch Intervention Values8 and deemed to require urgent
remediation
7 Meaning that any wastewater generated is recycled and any non-recycled water is disposed without discharge, through an appropriate means such as thermal
destruction
8 Source: Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning and the Environment, Netherlands; Soil Remediation Circular 2009, Annex A.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 136
S. No.
Environmental Component Impacted
Impact and Score5
Insignificant Consequence
(+/-) 1 point
Minor Consequence
(+/-) 2 points
Moderate Consequence
(+/-) 3 points
Major
Consequence
(+/-) 4 points
Catastrophic Consequence
(+/-) 5 points
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
7.1
Socio-economic Environment: Social Aspects - give the
mean score from the categories, rounded
to the nearest decimal
Possible Temporary or Permanent Migration, Persons as a % of Population of Study Area
<0.5% <1% <1.5% <2% 2.5%
Possible Change in Ethnicity, vis-à-vis Major Existing Ethnicities Present in Study Area
Not Likely Possible Limited Significant Severe
Gender Imbalance, as a Proportion to Existing Sex-Ratio
Not Likely Possible Limited Significant Severe
Possibility of Return to Original Status in Terms of Any or All of the Above Changes
<1 year <2 years <3 years <5 years Permanent Change
7.2
Socio-economic Environment:
Economic Aspects - give the mean score from the categories,
rounded to the nearest decimal
No of Jobs Gained or Lost
<50 Up to 75 Up to 100 Up to 250 Up to 500 or more
Persons Having Loss or Gain in Income
<50 100 250 500 1000 or more
Land Losers
<10 <20 <50 <100 >100
Losers of Homesteads
<5 <10 <25 <50 >50
7.3 Socio-economic Aspects: Cultural
Minor repairable damage to commonplace structures
Minor repairable damage to structures/ items of cultural
significance, or minor infringements of cultural
values
Moderate damage to structures/ items of cultural significance, or significant,
infringement of cultural values/ sacred location
Major damage to structures/ items of cultural significance,
or major infringement of cultural values/sacred
locations
Irreparable damage to highly valued structures/ items/
locations of cultural significance or sacred value
Consequence Distance
8.1 Risk to People
Slight injury or health effects (including first aid case and
medical treatment case). Not affecting work performance
or causing disability
Minor injury or health effects- Affecting work
performance, e.g. restriction to activities, or need to take a time off work to recover. Limited, reversible health effects e.g. skin irritation,
food poisoning
Major injury of health effects (including permanent
disability)- Affecting work performance in the longer
term. e.g. prolonged absence from work.
Irreversible health damage without loss of life, e.g.
Single fatality or permanent total disability- from an accident or occupational
illness
Multiple Fatalities-From an accident of occupational
illness
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 137
S. No.
Environmental Component Impacted
Impact and Score5
Insignificant Consequence
(+/-) 1 point
Minor Consequence
(+/-) 2 points
Moderate Consequence
(+/-) 3 points
Major
Consequence
(+/-) 4 points
Catastrophic Consequence
(+/-) 5 points
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
noise induced hearing loss, chronic back injuries
8.2 Risk to Environment
Slight Effect- Local Environment damage. Within the fence and within system.
Negligible financial consequences
Minor effect- contamination. Damage sufficiently large to
attack the environment. Single exceeding of statutory
or prescribed criterion. Single complaint. No
permanent effect on the environment
Localized effect- Limited loss of discharges of known
toxicity. Repeated exceeding of statutory or prescribed
limit. Affecting neighborhood. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage
within one year
Major effect- Severe environmental damage. The company is required to take
extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged environment to its original
state. Extended exceeding of statutory or prescribed limits
Massive effect-Persistent severe environmental
damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area. In terms of commercial or recreational use or nature
conservation, a major economic loss for the
company. Constant, high exceeding of statutory or
prescribed limits
Table 4-2: Magnitude Assessment (Ecology & Biodiversity)
S. No.
Ecological Components
Likely Impacted
Magnitude Rating (M)
Insignificant Consequence
(+/-) 1 point
Minor Consequence
(+/-) 2 points
Moderate Consequence
(+/-) 3 points
Major
Consequence
(+/-) 4 points
Severe Consequence
(+/-) 5 points
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
1 Flora /
Fauna
Habitat / Ecosystem
Terrestrial Flora
Terrestrial Fauna
Aquatic Flora
Aquatic Fauna
Marine Flora
Marine Fauna
Site specific loss (removal) of common floral species (but
not any tree or trees).
Vegetation composition does not form a habitat character
for any species of conservation significance.
No short term or long term impacts are likely to adversely affect the surrounding habitat
/ ecosystem.
Site specific disturbance to common / generalist faunal
Site specific loss (removal) of some saplings of trees.
Minor temporary impacts on ecosystem
functioning or habitat ecology of common / generalist species.
Minor short term / long term impacts on
surrounding / immediate / adjacent habitats and are resilient to changes
Site specific loss (removal) of some common well grown
tree / trees species.
Site specific loss of nesting / breeding habitat of common /
generalist species of flora-fauna but will not result in permanent loss of habitat.
Short term or long term impacts are likely to adversely affect the surrounding habitat
character/ habitat ecology/ functioning of ecosystem.
Site specific impact on threatened species but
impacted species is widely distributed outside the project site. Short term impacts may lead to loss of abundance or extent, but unlikely to cause local population extinction.
Site specific habitat loss of fauna listed in IUCN, WCMC, Birdlife International, or any
other international literature - secondary information.
Impact on threatened species listed in as a endemic / Schedule-I as per IWPA 1972, BSI, Red Data Book, ZSI, BSI or literature published by
any State Govt. Institute, University and Collage etc.
Loss of habitat of above said flora-fauna.
Impact on genetic diversity Impact on NP /PF /WLS /ESZ /IBA / tiger
reserve / elephant corridor / corridor.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 138
S. No.
Ecological Components
Likely Impacted
Magnitude Rating (M)
Insignificant Consequence
(+/-) 1 point
Minor Consequence
(+/-) 2 points
Moderate Consequence
(+/-) 3 points
Major
Consequence
(+/-) 4 points
Severe Consequence
(+/-) 5 points
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
species (e.g. movement pattern, displacement etc.).
No negative impacts on surrounding ecosystem functioning or habitat
ecology.
in habitat structure or condition.
Impact on surrounding agro-ecosystem / agriculture when
environmental data / parameters are within
permissible limits.
Impact on surrounding agro-ecosystem / agriculture when
physical parameters with marginal increase but can be
mitigated.
Impacts on habitats / ecosystems of international
importance.
Impact on ecosystem like river, forest, wetland (e.g. RAMSAR site
etc.) etc.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 139
2. Quantifying the Probability of Occurrence of the Impact
After identifying the consequence severity as shown in Table 4-1 & Table 4-2, the probability of occurrence also
needs to be estimated to arrive at a complete picture of environmental impact risk. Table 4-3&Table 4-4 provides
probability / likelihood ratings on a scale of 1-5. These ratings are used for estimating the likelihood of each
occurrence.
Table 4-3: Occurrence Frequency Assessment for EB
Description Occurrence Frequency Occurrence Frequency Rating (F)
Regular Continuous occurrence / each day 5
Frequent Occurs several times each year 4
Periodic Might occur a few times each year 3
Occasional Might happen few times during the project life cycle 2
Rare One time or one-off event during the project life cycle 1
Table 4-4: Probability of Occurrence for Others
Description Environment Health and Safety
Likelihood of Containment Failure,
Event / Year9
Probability
C1 C2 C3.1 OR C3.2 C4
Frequent Continues or will
happen every time
Has happened more than once per year at the location (in case of
expansion projects) or less than once per year in the organization /
similar installations
1 x 10-3 5
Often Occur several
times
Has happened at the location (in case of expansion projects) or more than once per year in organization /
similar installations
1 x 10-4 4
Likely Might occur at
least once
Has happened once in organization or more than once per year in
Industry 1 x 10-5 3
Possible Might occur Heard of in the Industry 1 x 10-6 2
Rare Very rarely
encountered Never heard of in the Industry 1 x 10-7 or lower 1
3. Quantifying Environmental Impact Risk
The level of environmental impact risk is calculated by multiplying the consequence score and the probability of
occurrence together. Thus
Significance of Impact = Consequence Score × Probability of Occurrence
The final score is in relative point score, rather than actual impact. Table 4-5 below assigns significance criteria,
based on the scale of 1-25, used for prioritizing mitigation measures for reducing the environmental impact risks
and thereafter, formulating and implementing Environmental Management Plans (EMPs).
To do this, environmental impact risk levels are first scored and identified as mentioned earlier and then evaluated
on the evaluation scale that follows in Table 4-5.
Table 4-5: Environmental Impact Significance Criteria
Probability Consequence (Risk)
Insignificant (1) Minor (2) Moderate (3) Major (4) Catastrophic (5)
Rare (1) 1 2 3 4 5
Possible (2) 2 4 6 8 10
9Based on published failure data, per recognized failure unit (such as km-years, unit of operation or others).
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 140
Probability Consequence (Risk)
Insignificant (1) Minor (2) Moderate (3) Major (4) Catastrophic (5)
Likely (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Often (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Certain (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Quantifying Ecological Impact
The level of environmental impact risk is calculated by multiplying the consequence score and the probability of
occurrence together. Thus,
Significance of Impact = Consequence Score × Probability of Occurrence
The final score is in relative point score, rather than actual impact. The impact estimation is carried out assuming
an implementation of sound management programmes to maintain healthy ecological conditions. Table 2-3 assigns
significance criteria, based on the scale of 1-25, used for prioritizing mitigation measures for reducing the
environmental impact and thereafter, formulating and implementing Environmental Management Plans (EMPs).
To do this, environmental impact risk levels are first scored and identified as mentioned earlier and then evaluated
on the evaluation scale that follows in Table 4-6.
Table 4-6: Ecological Impact Significance Criteria
Probability Severity
Insignificant (1) Minor (2) Moderate (3) Major (4) Extensive (5)
Indefinite / Rare (1) 1 2 3 4 5
Improbable (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Possible (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Probable (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Definite / Every day (5) 5 10 15 20 25
4. Identifying Activities Causing Unacceptable Levels of Environmental Risk
Environmental risks are now clubbed into four levels from extreme risk to low risk activities. Extreme risk activities
are unacceptable and therefore need to be either stopped or modified such that they are brought to a lower level of
environmental risk.
High and moderate risk activities, although acceptable, require being evaluated and mitigated in a manner that
their consequences / probabilities are lowered, with more focus on high risk activities vis-à-vis moderate risk
activities. Low risk activities do not require further mitigation. This is summarized in Table 4-7.
Table 4-7: Environmental Risk Categorization
Score Type of Risk Action Required
15-25 Extreme Risk Activity should not proceed in current form
8-12 High Risk Activity should be modified to include remedial planning and actions and be subject to
detailed EHS assessment
4-6 Moderate Risk Activity can operate subject to management and / or modification
1-3 Low Risk No action required unless escalation of risk is possible
Categorization of Ecological Risk
Ecological risk is categorized in to three levels from Less, Moderate and High ecological risk (Table 4-8). Activities
expected high ecological risk activities are unacceptable in current form and need to be eliminated or activity should
be modified to include remedial planning such that they are brought to the lower level of ecological impact
significance. Similarly, activities having less ecological risk require periodic monitoring / surveillance and an activity
having moderate ecological risk requires operational controls.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 141
Table 4-8: Ecological Risk Categorization
Impact Score Severity Mitigation Measures Required
> 20 High Activity / Aspect should be eliminated or Activity should be modified to include remedial planning
11 to 20 Moderate Operation subject to management by operational controls
1 to 10 Less Operation subject to periodic monitoring / surveillance
5. Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures require being formulated and implemented for all high risk and moderate risk activities. A
programme to implement all mitigation measures is then prepared and presented as an Environmental Management
Program.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 142
4.2.2 Identification of Impacting Activities for the Proposed Project
As discussed earlier, environmental impacts have been identified based on an assessment of environmental aspects associated with the project. The symbol ‘●’ indicates a
negative impact and ‘o’ indicates a beneficial (positive) impact. Identified environmental impacts have been listed in Table 4-9.
Table 4-9: Environmental Impacts
S. No.
Project Activity
Impact (Type: O, N, A, E;
Duration: T, P)
Potential Environmental Impacts on Environment
Remarks LU/LC AQ NV SW GW S EB SE RH SHW
OH/ CH&S
1. Construction Phase Not considered as no additional construction will be required
2. Operation Phase
2.1 Storage of propylene Leakage:
(A,T) ● ● ● ● ●
AQ: emission from storage tanks(i.e. scrubbed in scrubber); GW / S: Possibility of ground water and soil
contamination if leakage; RH & OH/OH&S: Risk to community health due to spillage
2.2 Storage of other
hazardous materials Leakage:
(A,T) ● ● ● ● ●
AQ: emission from storage tanks(i.e. scrubbed in scrubber); GW / S: Possibility of ground water and soil
contamination if leakage; RH & OH/OH&S: Risk to community health due to spillage
2.3 Transportation of Raw Materials and Products
Leakage: (A,T)
● ● ● ● ● ● o ● ●
AQ/GW/SW/ S/ OH: Possibility of due to leak or spillage of chemicals/ materials; NV: due to increase in traffic; EB: effect on vegetation due to leak or spillage of chemicals/
materials; RH: Risk of fire and dispersion if spillage of hazardous chemicals; SE: Indirect job
2.4 Manufacturing Process (N,P) ● ● ● ● ● ●
AQ: Process gas emission; NV: due to production operation; SW: Usage of water for process and waste
water generation; RH/OHS: Possibility of due to leak or spillage of hazardous material; SHW: Generation of
Process waste,
2.5 Operation of power plant and production
of steam (N,P) ● ● ● ● ● ●
AQ: Flue gas emission; NV: due to production operation; SW: Water consumption for production of steam; RH/OHS:
Possibility of due to leak or spillage of raw materials; SHW: Generation of Process waste,
2.6 Usage of Water (N,P) ● SW: Water will be supplied by Dahej GIDC.
2.7 Storage, handling and
disposal of solid/hazardous waste
(N,P) ● ● S: Possibility of soil contamination due to improper disposal of solid and Hazardous waste; OH/OH&S: Risk to
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 143
S. No.
Project Activity
Impact (Type: O, N, A, E;
Duration: T, P)
Potential Environmental Impacts on Environment
Remarks LU/LC AQ NV SW GW S EB SE RH SHW
OH/ CH&S
community health due to spillage in surrounding area if not stored properly
2.8 Operation of DG Set (N,P) ● ● ● AQ: Air emission from flue gas stacks, NV: Noise from operation of DG Set; SHW: Generation of used oil from
operation of DG set.
2.9 Operation of Boilers
and Incinerator (N,P) ● ● ●
AQ: Air emission from flue gas stacks, NV: Noise from operation of DG Set; SHW: Generation of used oil from
operation of Boilers and incinerator ash.
2.10 Handling of Coal (N,P) ● AQ: Fugitive emission due to coal handling
2.11 Operation of ETP (N,P) ● ● ● ● NV: due to ETP operation; GW/S: Untreated water leakage
and oil spilling; SHW: Generation of ETP Sludge
2.12 Landscaping and greenbelt area development
(N,P) o EB: Development of greenbelt will generate positive
impact
3. Decommissioning Phase
3.1 Dismantling of
structures of the project components
(O&T) ● ● ● ● ●
LU: Change in Landcover; AQ/NV: Dust and noise generation due to dismantling activity; SHW: Generation
of dismantling waste; OH/OH&S: Risk to community health due to dismantling
Type of Impact –O: One Time; N: Normal; A: Abnormal; E: Emergency; Duration of Impact –T: Temporary; P: Long-Term/ Permanent
LU/LC: Landuse/ Landcover; AQ: Air Quality; NV: Noise and Vibration; SW: Surface Water; GW: Ground Water; S: Soil; EB: Ecology & Bio-diversity; SE: Socio-Economic; RH: Risk & Hazard; SHW: Solid &Hazardous waste generation; OH/CH&S: Occupational Health, Community Health & Safety
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 144
4.3 Land Environment
4.3.1 Identification of Impacting Activities for the Proposed Expansion
As discussed earlier, environmental aspects and impacts have been identified based on an assessment of
environmental aspects associated with the project. Potential impacts on land use and land cover are given in Table
4-1.
Table 4-10: Aspect – Impact Identification
S. No.
Project Activities / Aspects Potential Environmental; Impacts on Land Use / Land
Cover (LU / LC)
1 Construction Phase Not considered as no additional
construction will be required
Land is already acquired and EC is already received. Proposed expansion will be done in same premises and same
plant/ machineries.
2 Operation Phase No additional required as clearance of site and preparation of
approach road is going on for EC already received
3 Decommissioning Phase
3.1 Dismantling of structures of the project components Minor change in landuse
Considering the above impact as well as the operating and other conditions mentioned above, the likely impact
scores on land environment are mentioned in Table 4-11.
Table 4-11: Impact Scoring - Land use/cover
Code
Land use Impacting
Activity
Aspect of activity that will impact
Land use/cover
Impact and Type – Direct (D) / Indirect
(I)
Impact Scoring
Remarks C P C x P
3.1
Dismantling of structures of the project components
change in landuse
D -1 1 -1 Minor
C: Consequence; P: Probability; C x P: Final Score
The impact scoring results shows that only one activity comes under minor or negligible impact of activity which
can operate
4.3.2 Indirect Impact
Operation and Maintenance
The main environmental issue for proposed expansion will be air pollution. So the effect of air pollution on land
use/ cover pattern was studied by overlaying the model of air pollutant isopleths on land use/cover map.
Effect of Ambient Air
The air modeling prediction for concentration of PM, SOx, NOx, HC are as shown in Annexure 15.
This area includes land use/cover i.e. Agriculture, Scrub, Open vegetation, close vegetation, River tributaries, Water
body, Industrial Area, Land without scrub, Habitation, Scrub (Forest), Open forest, Close forest, and Rocky area.
The vegetation in the region is of mixed type and in some area dominated by Prosopis juliflora species.
The scrub with scattered Prosopis juliflora species were seen.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 145
4.3.3 Mitigation Measure
Considering the above impact as well as the operating and other conditions mentioned above. It shows that there is
no considerable change likely in the land use and cover due to air pollution from the project. The likely indirect
impact would happen if the pollutants limit increases and for long time. This aspect will be dealt with each
functional area wise.
4.4 Air Environment
4.4.1 Operational Phase
Impacts on ambient air, during operation phase, would be;
1. Flue gases emission due to operation of boilers, use of DG sets of various capacity & due to operation of
Incinerator. Imported coal, lignite and HSD used as fuel
2. Particulate matter emission from exhaust / vent attached to boilers, incinerator, flare and coal handling etc.
The purpose of impact predictions on air environment, emission sources can be classified as point source. Emissions
from the above mentioned point sources will be predicted for its impacts on the Ground Level Concentration (GLC)
at various distances using the dispersion modeling guidelines given by the Central Pollution Control Board, New
Delhi and i.e. by using AERMOD view software.
About the Software
The American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model Improvement Committee
(AERMIC) was formed to introduce state-of-the-art modeling concepts into the EPA's air quality models. Through
AERMIC, a modeling system, AERMOD, was introduced that incorporated air dispersion based on planetary
boundary layer turbulence structure and scaling concepts, including treatment of both surface and elevated
sources, and both simple and complex terrain.
AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD) is a steady-state plume model. It is designed to apply to source releases and
meteorological conditions that can be assumed to be steady over individual modeling periods (typically one hour or
less). AERMOD has been designed to handle the computation of pollutant impacts in both flat and complex terrain
within the same modeling framework. In fact, with the AERMOD structure, there is no need for the specification of
terrain type (flat, simple, or complex) relative to stack height since receptors at all elevations are handled with the
same general methodology. To define the form of the AERMOD concentration equations, it is necessary to
simultaneously discuss the handling of terrain.
AERMET is an input data processor that is one of the regulatory components of the AERMOD modeling system. It
incorporates air dispersion based on planetary boundary layer turbulence structure and scaling concepts.
Meteorological Parameters
Surface meteorological data at project site was collected for 3 months (March-May, 2017). The hourly
meteorological data considered during this period were:
Wind speed;
Wind Direction;
Ambient atmospheric temperature;
Cloud cover;
Solar insolation;
Relative Humidity
Following parameters were considered for dispersion modelling;
1. Point source:
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 146
Quantity of fuel;
Emission rate of pollutants
2. Stack:
Internal diameter at top of stack;
Height of stack;
Exit gas velocity;
Exit gas temperature
Source of Emission
Impacts on ambient air, during operation phase, would be due to emissions due to operation of boilers using
imported coal as fuel. Also, during power failure, the DG sets of different capacity will be used as power backup.
The fuel will be HSD in DG sets and imported coal in Boiler. The flue gas stacks will be considered as point of
pollutants’ emission source.
Process vents are considered and done air dispersion modeling separately.
Emission from Flue Gas Stacks
The stack details along with emission rate of Pollutants are given as Table 4-12.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 147
Table 4-12: Flue Gas Stack details and emission rate of pollutants after proposed expansion
S. No.
Stack Attached to
Capacity
Stack Height
(m)
Stack Diameter
(m)
Stack Gas Exit Velocity,
(m/s)
Stack Gas Exit Temp,
K
Type of Fuel Used
Fuel Consumption
(Kg/Hr)
APCM Reduction Efficiency
(%)
SO2 Emitted, (gm/sec)
PM Emitted, (gm/sec)
NOx Emitted,
(g/s)
1 Boiler-1
100 TPH 81 3.02 15 423
Indian Coal 46000 99.9 0.10 4.9 0.01
Imported Coal
42000 99.5 0.58 4.7 0.06
2 Boiler-2
Imported Coal
16000 99.5 0.22 1.8 0.06
Lignite 38000 99.5 2.11 9.3 0.06
3 Incinerator 36440 Nm3/hr
30 0.89 15 423 Gas 40 m3/hr 98 0.026 0.007 0.053
4 DG Set 1500 KVA 30 0.35 10 423 HSD 500 lit/hr 0 0.5 0.01 11.4
5 DG Set 1500 KVA 30 0.35 10 423 HSD 500 lit/hr 0 0.5 0.01 11.4
Emission from Process Vents
The results of incremental GLC for HC from the Process Vents and isopleth of HC are shown as Annexure 15. The process vents details and emission rate of pollutant are
given as Table 4-13.
Table 4-13: Process Vents details and Pollutant’s Emission Rate
S. No.
Stack Attached to Stack Height
(m)
Stack Diameter (m)
Stack Gas Exit Velocity, (m/s)
Stack Gas Exit Temp, K
HC Emitted, (gm/sec)
PM Emitted, (gm/sec)
1 Process Emergency Relief (Intermittent) 61 1 67 308 0.7637 -
2 Coal Handling-1 (Crusher House) 17 0.10 1.20 308 - 0.00137
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 148
Assumptions
The dispersion modeling assumptions considered are as follows:
The emission rate for SO2 was calculated based on 0.41% Sulphur content in the Indian Coal, 0.5%
sulphur in Imported Coal & 0.25% sulphur in HSD.
The emission rate for PM was calculated based on 38.63% ash content in the Indian Coal, 8% ash in
Imported Coal & 0.01% ash in HSD.
The terrain of the study area was considered as FLAT.
Stability class was evaluated based on solar insolation and cloud cover.
The mathematical equations used for the dispersion modeling assumes that the earth surface acts as a perfect
reflector of plume and physic-chemical processes such as dry and wet deposition and chemical transformation of
pollutants are negligible.
Study has been conducted for summer season March – May, 2017. The stack emission concentrations used for
dispersion modeling were taken as per CPCB guidelines.
Air Quality Modeling
Results
The incremental increase in GLC of SOx, NOx, PM & HC due to expansion activity is presented in Table 4-14.
The worst combined environmental situation is predicted as the sum of maximum monitored value of a parameter
and the incremental GLC at the monitoring location. This is a conservative estimate and probability of such
occurrence is unlikely. The predicted results are summarized below. Further detailed results and Isopleth in
Annexure 15.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 149
Table 4-14: 24 hr average Incremental Increase in GLC
S. No.
Name of Village/ Industry
(Distance in km/
Direction)
Pollutant
Average Monitored Baseline
Concentration
(µg/m3)
Incremental GLC
(µg/m3)
Total Predictive GLC due to expansion
(µg/m3)
Indian Coal Imported
Coal Imported Coal
+ Lignite Indian Coal
Imported Coal
Imported Coal + Lignite
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C4 + C5 C4 + C6 C4 + C7
AA 1
At Project Site
(0.00/Base)
(Industrial, Residential, Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 82 1.07 1.026 2.41 83.07 83.026 84.41
SO2 <8.0 0.053 0.151 0.53 <8.053 <8.151 <8.53
NOX 17.2 0.082 0.087 0.095 17.282 17.287 17.295
HC 1327 0.619 1327.619
AA 2
At Ambheta Village
(0.85/SSW)
(Industrial, Residential, Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 83 0.42 0.403 0.95 83.42 83.403 83.95
SO2 <8.0 0.019 0.058 0.21 <8.019 <8.058 <8.021
NOX 18.5 0.025 0.028 0.057 18.525 18.528 18.557
HC 1282 0.328 1282.328
AA 3
At Lakhigam Village
(3.86/W)
(Industrial, Residential, Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 98 0.15 0.147 0.35 98.15 98.147 98.35
SO2 14.5 0.005 0.019 0.07 14.505 14.519 14.57
NOX 20.4 0.003 0.004 0.006 20.403 20.404 20.406
HC 1567 0.033 1567.033
AA 4
At Dahej Village
(1.64/NW)
(Industrial, Residential, Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 91 0.22 0.209 0.49 91.22 91.209 91.49
SO2 <8.0 0.007 0.028 0.11 <8.007 <8.028 <8.11
NOX 22.2 0.009 0.010 0.011 22.209 22.21 22.211
HC 1334 0.083 1334.083
AA 5
At Suva Village
(6.00/ESE)
(Industrial, Residential, Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 77 0.18 0.173 0.41 77.18 77.173 77.41
SO2 <8.0 0.008 0.024 0.09 <8.008 <8.024 <8.09
NOX 17.8 0.009 0.011 0.013 17.809 17.811 17.813
HC 1185 0.075 1185.075
AA 6
EPL Project Site
(2.11/ NNE)
(Industrial, Residential, Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 71 0.21 0.198 0.47 71.21 71.198 71.47
SO2 <8.0 0.007 0.027 0.10 <8.007 <8.027 <8.10
NOX 17.2 0.013 0.013 0.013 17.213 17.213 17.213
HC 1327 0.088 1327.088
AA 7 At Vajapura Village
(6.4/NNE)
PM10 65 0.10 0.091 0.22 65.10 65.091 65.22
SO2 8.5 0.004 0.012 0.05 8.504 8.512 8.55
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 150
S. No.
Name of Village/ Industry
(Distance in km/
Direction)
Pollutant
Average Monitored Baseline
Concentration
(µg/m3)
Incremental GLC
(µg/m3)
Total Predictive GLC due to expansion
(µg/m3)
Indian Coal Imported
Coal Imported Coal
+ Lignite Indian Coal
Imported Coal
Imported Coal + Lignite
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C4 + C5 C4 + C6 C4 + C7
(Industrial, Residential, Rural & Other Areas)
NOX 12.8 0.006 0.007 0.007 12.806 12.807 12.807
HC 1114 0.045 1114.045
AA 8
At Vadala Village
(4.93/NE)
(Industrial, Residential, Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 81 0.40 0.383 0.90 81.40 81.383 81.90
SO2 11.0 0.018 0.054 0.20 11.018 11.054 11.20
NOX 30.9 0.025 0.028 0.031 30.925 30.928 30.931
HC 1075 0.172 1075.172
It is observed that:
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for SO2 when Indian Coal will be used as fuel is observed to be 0.10 µg/m3. These GLC’s are expected to occur at
a distance of 500 m from the source towards the ENE direction.
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for SO2 when Imported Coal will be used as fuel is observed to be 0.273 µg/m3. These GLC’s are expected to
occur at a distance of 500 m from the source towards the ENE direction.
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for SO2 when Imported Coal + Lignite will be used as fuel is observed to be 0.962 µg/m3. These GLC’s are
expected to occur at a distance of 500 m from the source towards the ENE direction.
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for NOx when Indian Coal will be used as fuel is observed to be 0.169 µg/m3. These GLC’s are expected to occur
at a distance of 500 m from the source towards the ENE direction.
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for NOx when Imported Coal will be used as fuel is observed to be 0.178 µg/m3. These GLC’s are expected to
occur at a distance of 500 m from the source towards the ENE direction.
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for NOx when Imported Coal + Lignite will be used as fuel is observed to be 0.188 µg/m3. These GLC’s are
expected to occur at a distance of 500 m from the source towards the ENE direction.
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for PM when Indian Coal will be used as fuel is observed to be 1.96 µg/m3. These GLC’s are expected to occur at
a distance of 500 m from the source towards the ENE direction.
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for PM when Imported Coal will be used as fuel is observed to be 1.88 µg/m3. These GLC’s are expected to occur
at a distance of 500 m from the source towards the ENE direction.
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for PM when Imported Coal + Lignite will be used as fuel is observed to be 4.40 µg/m3. These GLC’s are expected
to occur at a distance of 500 m from the source towards the ENE direction.
The maximum incremental 24 hourly average GLC’s for HC is observed to be 3.51 µg/m3. These GLC’s are expected to occur at a distance of 250 m from the source towards
the SSW direction.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 151
4.4.2 Mitigation Measures
General Mitigation Measures incorporated in the project for Air Quality Control during Operation Phase:
Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) is provided on two boilers.
DPL has provided chilled water condensers and activated carbon bed adsorbers to remove VOCs from
spent air. However, to make sure that no VOCs is released to atmosphere and for additional protection
spent air incinerator is provided.
To burn lighter hydrocarbon from process emergency relief system a flare is provided. Flare height is 65 m
and it is decided to take care of maximum possible relief from the plant.
Bag-filter is provided on crusher house to reduce PM emission.
Greenbelt will be developed at the facility.
Attenuation of pollution/protection of receptor through greenbelt/green cover.
Regular monitoring of air polluting concentrations.
All vehicles shall be PUC Certified from time to time.
Proper PPE like dust masks will be provided to workers.
Considering the above mitigation measures as well as the operating and other conditions mentioned in the above
sections, the impact scores on air environment is presented in Table 4-15 as below:
Table 4-15: Impact Scoring of Air Environment
S. No. Impacting Activity Impact Scoring
Remarks C P C x P
1 Construction Phase Not considered as no additional construction will be required
2 Operation Phase
2.1 Production of Phenol, Cumene
and other products -2 3 -6
Air emissions of pollutants such as PM, SOx, NOx, HC within norms specified by the SPCB ensured
by
Adequate stack height
ESP, Incinerator, Flare and Bag
2.2 Storage and transportation of Raw Materials and Products
-2 3 -6 Online HC detectors will be installed to take
immediate corrective action.
2.3 Usage of Fuel for Operation
Boiler, Incinerator, DG set, Flare -2 2 -4
Adequate stack height and proper APCM will be provided. DG sent will be operated only during
power failure
C: Consequence; P: Probability; C x P: Final Score
4.4.3 Fugitive Emissions
Source of the Fugitive Emission
The fugitive emissions may be attributed to the following sources;
Equipment leaks like pumps, pipelines, vessels, columns, reactors etc.
Process venting
Evaporation losses
Disposal of waste gas streams
Accident and equipment failures
Control Measures
Control measures adopted are;
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 152
In Process Plant
All vessels used in the manufacturing areas shall be closed and the transfer of material within the plant
shall be through pipelines.
Gas detectors shall be installed near all potential sources of leakage to detect and provide alarm in case of
any leakage.
Upon operation of the plant, M/s DPL shall prepare a schedule for leak detection and repair (LDAR) and
implement the program.
All the sampling points shall have closed loop sampling to prevent any emission.
The process vents shall be directed to vent chillers employing chilled water at 2oC and carbon bed
adsorbers to recover most of the VOC’s following which the air stream shall be directed to the incinerator
for final destruction of the VOC’s.
Vent scrubber and oxidizer relief drum (with a cold condensate seal loop) shall be provided for scrubbing
and preventing any liquid carryover to the ambient atmosphere during normal and emergency scenarios
DPL shall have a dedicated flare system for the cumene plant for routing any hydrocarbon vent from the
plant. Flaring is essential for combusting the hydrocarbon vent prior to release in the atmosphere.
Some typical service pumps like those of benzene and propylene shall have double mechanical seal to
prevent any chance of emission. In addition, some valves in the cumene plant shall also have special
packing to prevent any leakage of media to the exterior.
Storage Tanks Area
Gas detectors shall be installed near all potential sources of leakage to detect and provide alarm in case of
any leakage.
Benzene storage tanks shall be internal floating roof kind with double seal to prevent benzene vapour
emission.
Nitrogen blanketing is provided for all the tanks and storage vessel to prevent fugitive emissions.
Vent condenser is provided for acetone storage tanks to arrest the release of acetone vapour to the
ambient atmosphere.
Propylene and propane shall be stored in mounded bullets.
4.4.4 Odour Control
Vessel drains are routed to closed drain system.
All the sampling points shall have closed loop sampling.
The process vents shall be directed to vent chillers employing chilled water at 2oC and carbon bed
adsorbers to recover most of the VOC’s following which the air stream shall be directed to the incinerator
for final destruction of the VOC’s.
LDAR program will be implemented to monitor and control fugitive emission and hence odour control.
Some typical service pumps like those of benzene and propylene shall have double mechanical seal to
prevent any chance of emission. In addition, some valves in the cumene plant shall also have special
packing to prevent any leakage of media to the exterior. Hence it will help in odour control.
4.4.5 Leak Detection and Repair Programme (LDAR)
Leak detection and repair programme (LDAR) is a work practice designed to quantify and control fugitive emissions
from potential sources like pumps, open ended lines, sampling connections, valves, flanges etc. Leaking equipment
is a major source of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and volatile hazardous air pollutants.
A component that is subjected to LDAR requirements shall be monitored at specified, regular intervals to determine
any leakage. Any leaking component then shall be repaired or replaced within a specified time frame. Once the
plant is commissioned, M/s DPL shall prepare a schedule for LDAR and implement the programme.
Procedure to be followed;
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 153
Identifying the components: All possible components that can leak shall be properly identified and tagged.
Leak definition: - Thresh hold leak definition shall be lower than what is prescribed in the regulations. Weekly visual
inspections of pumps, valves shall be done for indications of liquids leaking.
Monitoring the components: As per the frequency the component shall be monitored for leak possibility using a
portable detecting instrument.
Repairing the components: After a leak is detected, the component shall be modified or replaced to correct the
leakage. The component shall be considered repaired only after it has been monitored and shows leakage below
the thresh-hold limits.
Record keeping: All record of the above steps shall be maintained for future use.
M/s DPL has used effective techniques for the control of fugitive emissions like use of;
Special packing in pumps and valves, and internal floating roof tanks with double seals for benzene service.
Gas detectors at potential locations to alert the operators in case of any leak scenario.
Closed loop sampling systems.
Closed lines for process fluid transfer.
Flare system for routing of any process relief from cumene plant.
Air quality shall be regularly monitored and data on fugitive emissions shall be regularly monitored and recorded
and appropriate action shall be taken if the air quality is found to be deteriorating.
4.5 Traffic Survey
Traffic survey is very important parameter to assess the impact due to proposed project on local existing
transportation. Right now adjacent road is 12m wide. GIDC has initiated work on North and East side of the plot
constructing 18m wide road for smooth movement of vehicles. Traffic survey is presented in Table 4-16.
Table 4-16: Details of Traffic Survey of 24 Hours
S. No
Sampling Location
Traffic Flow
Mechanized Vehicle Non -Mechanized
Vehicle
All Category
2W 3W 4W 2W 3W 4W
Bik
e/
Mo
pe
d
Ric
ksh
aw
Ca
r/ J
ee
p
Bu
s
Tru
ck
Tra
cto
r
Cycle
Tri
cycle
Ca
rt
1 Vadadla
Bus Stand
Towards Dahej
3010 90 2860 627 4707 68 1610 0 5 12977
Towards Bharuch
2686 75 2367 645 4115 53 1381 6 15 11343
4.6 Noise Environment
The proposed expansion related activities will lead to emission of noise that may have minor impact on the
surrounding communities in terms of minor increase in noise levels. The potential impacts on noise level may arise
out of the following:
Noise from Vehicle /Traffic
Vehicle movement for transportation of materials and work force to the site will cause minor noise emission as the
frequency of vehicular movement is few times in a week.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 154
Noise from DG Set, Boiler, Incinerator, etc.
Noise generated from DG Set, Boiler, Incinerator, etc. will have a permanent effect to the workers working in the
nearby vicinity, if they will work for more hours in a day.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 155
Table 4-17: Environmental Impact Scoring
S. No.
Project Activity Identified
Aspect N/AN/E Legal
Impact Scoring Significance/ Consequence
Operation Controls/Mitigation Measures
EMP required Consequence,
C
Probability,
P
Final Score,
C×P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14
1 Construction Phase Not considered as no additional construction will be required
2 Operational Phase
2.1 Transportation of Raw Materials and Products
Noise Generation
N No -2 5 -10 Moderately
Severe
Project activities to be undertaken during regular working hours, Erection of temporary barriers
No
2.2 Manufacturing Process Noise
Generation N No -2 5 -10
Moderately Severe
Project activities to be undertaken during regular working hours, Erection of temporary barriers
No
2.3
Operation of power plant and production
of steam
Noise Generation
N No -2 5 -10 Moderately
Severe
Periodic Maintenance and servicing of mechanized
equipment and vehicles used.
PUC certified vehicles will be used
No
2.4 Operation of DG Set, Boilers, Incinerator,
ETP pumps
Noise Generation
N No -2 5 -10 Moderately
Severe
Use of Good equipment, periodic servicing of mechanized
equipment No
3 Decommissioning Phase
3.1 Dismantling of
structures of the project components
Noise generation
N No -2 3 -6 Less Severe
SOP’s will be followed. Acoustic enclosures will be provided.
Earplugs and Earmuffs will be provided to workers.
Yes
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 156
4.6.1 Assessment of Noise using SoundPlan
Noise modeling study was done using the Software tool called “Sound Plan” which predicts the Noise Map
generated due to the sources present at the project site, and predicts the Noise Levels at various receiver points
due to the sources present at the project site.
To analyse the Noise Map of the project site, first, the geometrically coordinated Google Earth images of the Project
site were imported into the software. Various Sources of noise were added with their approximate Sound Pressure
Levels, and the “Receiver points” were added at various locations where Noise Monitoring was conducted.
“SoundPlan” generates the Noise Map with coloured pattern isoplates, which indicate whether or not the SPL in that
particular region is above the limits mentioned by CPCB or not. If the Limit for Sound Pressure Level indicated by
CPCB for that particular area is 75 dB during the day, and if the predicted SPL is below that, the Noise Map will
show Green colour for that area. But if the SPL is above the “user set” allowable limit, the same will be shown in
Red colour depending upon the Difference between then Predicted SPL and the Allowable SPL, and the “Conflict” in
SPL is mentioned in the table if any conflict is predicted.
4.6.2 Consideration during the analysis
The sources considered at the project site for the analysis with their approximate Sound Pressure Levels are
considered slightly on the higher side for more critical analysis. The sources of noise considered are as Table 4-18.
Table 4-18: Sources of noise with their sound pressure levels
S. No. Sources Levels dB(A)
1. DG Sets 85
2. Cooling Tower 85
3. Pump 85
4. Boiler 95
5. Incinerator 95
Using above consideration the isopleths generated during daytime and night time are as given in Figure 4-1 and
Figure 4-2.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 157
Figure 4-1: Isopleths for Incremental Noise Generated during Daytime
Figure 4-2: Isopleths for Incremental Noise Generated during Night Time
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 158
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 159
4.6.3 Observations
The sound pressure levels were predicted at different sources as mentioned above. The observations are:
The project site is located in a designated industrial area, where the CPCB limits defined for Noise Levels are 75 dB during the day and 70 dB during the night.
However, sound pressure levels are considered on higher side for more critical analysis.
Since the sources of noise are present within the project site, and the boundary wall of the project site being present, increase beyond 75 dB at the site was not
observed.
From Figure 4-1 and Figure 4-2, it can be observed at project site, noise is predicted in the range of 60 dB(A) - 70 dB(A) which is within the permissible limit for
industrial area.
The predicted noise levels along with the conflict are as given in Table 4-19.
Table 4-19: Noise level at receptor locations
S. No.
Receiver Name Category
CPCB Limits in dB (A)
Baseline Average Noise levels in dB (A)
SPL predicted at Receiver by Proposed Activities (dB)
Predicted Cumulative incremental increase in Noise level dB (A)
Incremental increase in Noise level dB (A)
Day Night Day Night
Day Night Day Night Day Night
A B C
Result from SoundPlan Algorithmic Calculation C=A-B
1 At project site NE corner Industrial 75.0 70.0 69.0 60.9 51.5 45.3 69.1 61.0 0.1 0.1
2 At project site (ETP) Industrial 75.0 70.0 69.1 66.0 52.2 49.7 69.2 66.1 0.1 0.1
3 At Project boundary (East) Industrial 75.0 70.0 65.5 63.7 48.4 46.3 65.5 63.7 0.1 0.1
4 Admin Office Industrial 75.0 70.0 65.5 63.7 54.0 44.8 65.8 63.7 0.3 0.1
5 Nr. DG Set Industrial 75.0 70.0 69.7 65.5 49.2 45.8 69.7 65.6 0.0 0.0
6 Main gate Industrial 75.0 70.0 69.8 65.4 55.1 46.2 70.0 65.5 0.1 0.1
7 Ambetha village Residential 55.0 45.0 55.5 44.9 37.8 27.7 55.6 45.0 0.1 0.1
4.6.4 Conclusion
From above, during the day time and night time only 0.1 dB increase are noticed in the Industrial area and Residential area, i.e. No increase to maximum increase of 0.1 dB
which is negligible considering that the minimum increase noticeable by a human ear is 0.5 dB.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 160
4.6.5 Mitigation Measures
Although there was no increase beyond the allowable limit predicted at any of the noise monitoring locations
outside the project site, the noise environment also includes the people who are working within the project site,
and who may face permanent hearing damage in case they face the Noise Dosage beyond the allowable level of
Noise. Therefore, it is important to implement the following mitigation in order to avoid any permanent hearing
damage to the people working inside the project site.
Acoustic Enclosures on all major equipment in the plant will have to be provided for noise attenuation
Workers should also be provided with suitable personal protective equipment (PPE) such as earmuffs and
earplugs.
Rotation of workers in the high noise area.
High noise generating areas would be identified and tags marked.
Green belt will be developed to reduce noise.
Vehicle trips to be minimized to the extent possible.
Acoustic mufflers / enclosures to be provided in large engines/machineries.
Equipment to be maintained in good working order.
Implement good working practices (equipment selection) to minimize noise and reduce its impacts on
human health (earmuffs, safe distances, and enclosures).
Noise to be monitored in ambient air within the premises.
All equipment operated within specified design parameters
4.7 Surface Water and Hazardous Waste
Based on this preliminary identification, environmental indices that are likely to be impacted on ground and surface
water quality during the operation phase and which are discussed in further detail.
4.7.1 Impacts Scoring on Surface Water & Hazardous Waste Management
Likely impact scores on surface water environment and Hazardous waste management are presented in Table 4-20.
Table 4-20 Impact Scoring for Surface Water Management
S. No.
Impacting Activity
Impact Scoring
Remarks Consequence, C
Probability, P
Final Score, C x P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
1 Construction Phase Not considered as no additional construction will be required
2 Operation Phase
1 Transportation of Raw Materials and
Products -2 1 -2
Minor impact as proper care shall be taken during raw material transportation and handling to avoid spillage and leakage.
2
Manufacturing process – pre-
dispersion, dispersion, mixing & tinting, packing,
etc.
-2 5 -10
Moderate impact. Wastewater generated from the process will be treated in ETP
followed by RO and treated water will be recycled in plant which will reduce the fresh water demand. Surplus treated water will be discharged into GIDC drain with prior
permission.
Process waste will be disposed at approved TSDF site or handed over to authorized
vendors. .
3 Operation of power plant and
-2 2 -4 Low impact. Steam condensate will be recycled and reused for makeup water in
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 161
S. No.
Impacting Activity
Impact Scoring
Remarks Consequence, C
Probability, P
Final Score, C x P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
production of steam
boiler. Boiler ash will be sold to nearest cement industries.
4 Usage of Water -3 5 -15
High impact. To reduce fresh water demand recycling RO will be installed and
permeate water will be used in cooling tower make up. Adequate measures to be taken to reduce the fresh water demand. condensate recovery from the boiler shall
be increased.
5 Operation of DG
Set -2 2 -4
Low impact as DG set will be operate during power failure only and used oil
generated from the DG set will store in a drum and handed over to authorized
vendor.
6 Operation of Incinerator
-2 4 -8 Moderate impact. Incineration ash will be
disclosed at approved TSDF facility.
7 Operation of ETP -2 2 -4
Low impact. Proper operation and maintenance of effluent treatment plant will
be done to ensure meeting specified disposal standards
8 Spillage of diesel,
oil, lubes, etc. -2 2 -4
Low impact. Oil will be collected properly and sold to authorized recyclers.
C Dismantling of structures of the project components
1
Dismantling of structures of the
project components
-1 2 -2 Minor impact
4.7.2 Mitigation Measures for Impacts on Surface Water Sources and Quality
Following mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce surface water related impacts:
Treated water will be recycled and reused in plant premises through recycling RO.
Explore the possibility of condensate recovery from the boiler which will reduce the overall water demand.
Wastewater from the washing activities will again reuse in washing purpose.
Drip irrigation system will be proposed to reduce fresh water demand for gardening.
Proper operation and maintenance of effluent treatment plant & RO will be done to ensure meeting
specified disposal standards and also no discharge of untreated waste water on land, avoiding leakages;
Provide separate drainage for storm water and effluent to avoid any contamination of surface water
sources;
All chemical and fuel storage and handling areas will be provided with proper bunds to avoid run-off
contamination.
Hazardous Wastes will be properly handled in containers and properly stored in hazardous waste storage
areas as per rules and also bunding will be provided to avoid overflow of spillage waters which can
contaminate the surroundings.
Recyclable waste will be handed over to authorized recyclers and other hazardous waste will be disposed
at approved TSDF facility
4.8 Ground Water and Geology
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 162
4.8.1 Impact
The water supply to propose industry is to be arrange from surface water i.e. Narmada water which is supplied by
Dahej GIDC Water Supply System.
Therefore from resources utilization point of view on groundwater there will not be any likely direct impact. But as
this is a Chemical industry the proposed landuse Storage area (13.18 %), Chemical store (0.26 %) and N2 storage
(0.18 %) area is planned and mentioned. From the aforesaid information it may be concluded that these will be a
probable source of point solution that may likely to have adverse impact, in eventuality of any leakage as geological
formation being alluvial.
The observation on historical water level data indicates in these alluvial aquifer dilution in water quality is likely.
This area is under Narmada canal command, therefore apart from rainfall recharge, return seepage from irrigated
field and canal seepage may likey increase recharge quantum to underground aquifer which may improve
groundwater quality and therefore care need to be taken to restrict/control any likely pollution.
4.8.2 Mitigation
The special care need to be taken to make the subsurface area impermeable/impervious below likely foundation
depth, by providing a thin layer (20-25 mm thickness) made up of bentonite, fly ash, fine sand and cement to
reduce the possibility/probability of any likely leakage of pollutant into underground environment
As mentioned as this being a notified area the concept of water conserve is water produce can be used here. The
stored run off water from green belt are roof top and Paved are can be used as a supplemental water supply to
reduce fresh water consumption to some extent.
Based on the above discussion, the post mitigation impact score is presented in Table 4-21.
Table 4-21: Impact scoring Ground water
Code Impacting
Activity
Impact Scoring
Remarks Consequence, C
Probability, P
Final Score
C x P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
1. Construction Phase Not considered as no additional construction will be required
2. Operation Phase
2.1 Storage of propylene
-2 2 -4
Low risk
The subsurface area will made impermeable/ impervious below providing a thin layer (20-25 mm
thickness) made up of bentonite, fly ash, fine sand and cement to reduce the possibility/probability of any likely
leakage of pollutant into underground environment
2.2 Storage of other
hazardous materials -1 2 -2
Low risk
It is assumed that storage is having impervious foundation base and guard around the structure to restrict flow
2.3 Transportation of Raw Materials and
Products -1 2 -2 Low risk
2.4 Storage and handling of
Hazardous waste -2 2 -4
Low risk
Storage and handling will be done on impermeable/ impervious area
2.5 Storage, handling and disposal of
-1 2 -2 Low risk
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 163
Code Impacting
Activity
Impact Scoring
Remarks Consequence, C
Probability, P
Final Score
C x P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
solid/hazardous waste
It is assumed that storage is having impervious base and guard around the
structure to restrict flow
3. Decommissioning Phase No impact identified
4.9 Ecology & Bio-diversity
4.9.1 Likely Impacts on Flora fauna
Identification of Impact Zone
As Though the concentrations of the emitted pollutants will be kept within permissible levels through the various
engineering controls, it is essential to have eco-management in the Likely Impact Zone (LIZ) for safeguard and
enhanced of ecological environment of the project area. So, EIA coordinator suggested assuming LIZ of 1.5 km
around the project site.
Determination of Ecological Components Likely Impacted
Following components are determined which may face likely impacts in different phases due to various project
activities. Details are tabulated in the Table 4-22.
Table 4-22: Activity-Aspect Based Determination of Impacting Ecological Components
S. No. Activity Aspect Ecological Components
TFL TFA AFL AFA MFL MFN
1. Construction Phase Not considered as no additional construction will be required
2. Project operation Phase
2.1 Transportation Raw material
Leakage of raw material
√ -- -- -- -- --
3. Decommissioning Phase No impact identified
Likely Impacts on Ecological Components
As discussed earlier, environmental aspects and impacts have been identified based on an assessment of
environmental aspects associated with the project. Potential impacts on Ecology and Biodiversity are given in Table
4-23.
Table 4-23: Impact Assessment and Mitigation Measures
S.
No
.
Asp
ect
Descri
pti
on
Lik
ely
Im
pa
cts
on
Eco
log
y a
nd
Bio
div
ers
ity (
EB
)
Imp
act
Co
nse
qu
en
ce
- P
rob
ab
ilit
y
De
scri
pti
on
/
Ju
sti
fica
tio
n
Impact Scoring
Re
ma
rks
Mit
iga
tio
n M
ea
su
res
EM
P R
eq
uir
ed
Ma
gn
itu
de
, M
Fre
qu
en
cy,
F
Fin
al
Sco
re,
M x
F
C1 C2 C3 C4 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
1. Construction Phase Not considered as no additional construction will be required
2. Operation Phase
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 164
S.
No
.
Asp
ect
Descri
pti
on
Lik
ely
Im
pa
cts
on
Eco
log
y a
nd
Bio
div
ers
ity (
EB
)
Imp
act
Co
nse
qu
en
ce
- P
rob
ab
ilit
y
De
scri
pti
on
/
Ju
sti
fica
tio
n
Impact Scoring
Re
ma
rks
Mit
iga
tio
n M
ea
su
res
EM
P R
eq
uir
ed
Ma
gn
itu
de
, M
Fre
qu
en
cy,
F
Fin
al
Sco
re,
M x
F
2.1 Leakage of Raw material
Impact-5: Impact on
surrounding vegetation
and associated
biodiversity.
Impact-5: in case of leakage proper Disaster management plan has been prepared by the
company and immediate action will be
taken
-3 1 -3 Less
Severe
Implementation of proper safety measures and control devices (engineering
control) will be implemented.
3. Decommissioning Phase No impact identified
4.10 Soil Environment
Impact Identification
Impact identified for soil is given in Table 4-24.
Table 4-24: Impact scoring for Soil
Code Impacting Activity
Impact Scoring
Basis of scoring Consequence, C
Probability, P
Final Score
C x P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
1 Construction Phase Not considered as no additional construction will be required
2 Operation Phase
2.1 Storage of propylene -2 3 -6 Moderate impact due to
spillage
2.2 Storage of other
hazardous materials -2 3 -6
Spillage may have moderate impact on soil quality
2.3 Transportation of Raw Materials and Products
-2 2 -4 Moderate impact due to
spillage
2.7 Storage, handling and
disposal of solid/hazardous waste
-2 3 -6 Moderate impact due to
spillage
2.11 Operation of ETP -2 2 -4 Spillage of ETP waste may
have minor impact
3 Decommissioning Phase No impact identified
4.10.1 Mitigation Measures
Spillage of materials may be taken care of to avoid soil contamination and deterioration on soil quality as
cement is highly alkaline
Spillage of paints, oil, diesel etc. take care to avoid soil contamination
If soil becomes saline/alkaline due to fall of construction materials, use of ETP waste water/municipal solid
waste etc.; use gypsum, organic manures and provide drainage for removal of excess salt
4.11 Socio-economic Environment
Table 4-25: Socio-economic Impact Assessment
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 165
Code Impacting Activities Nature, N/AN/E
Consequence, C Probability, P Final Score, C X
P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
1 Construction Phase Not considered as no additional construction will be required
2 Operation Phase
2.3 Transportation of Raw Materials and Products A,T 4 1 4
Note: The socio-economic impact scoring has been based on considering following assumptions:
Environment guidelines given by MoEF will be followed by the project proponent.
Project proponent will recruit local people.
The Social Corporate Responsibility will be carried on and monitored regularly
Community Consultation
The Community consultation has been carried out at Dahej, Ambheta, etc. on various topics/issues related to social
development in the surrounding areas. The CSR activities with budgetary provisions has been shown in the Table
4-26.
Table 4-26: Issues Raised During Community Consultation
Name of Participant
Designation
Village Date Issues/Requirements
Discussed Measures Proposed
Mr. Jaideep Sinh S Rana
(Mobile No. 8511516506)
Sarpanch Dahej 29/03/2017 • Employment for the land losers
& PAFs. Initiatives taken by the
industrialist to improve the
employability of local peoples.
• Details of CSR spend in the
preceding year activities wise.
• List of Activities to be carried
out by the industrialist in Dahej
GIDC/PCPIR are as follows:-
• Beautification of village pond
with sitting arrangement and
solar light facilities.
• Renovation of Anganwadis and
purchase of utensils & toys at
regular interval.
• Interval village roads
development (RCC) with paver
blocks on the both sides of
road.
• Construction of Overhead tanks
for 50,000 population (Dahej)
and underground drainage
system.
• Construction & Renovation of
toilets for approx. 300 houses of
APL/BPL communities.
• Distribution of garbage bucket
to all the families in surrounding
• At regular interval the
project proponent will
conduct internal skill
development training
to increase the
employability.
• The project proponent
shall put every effort
to improve the Quality
of life of the people of
surrounding Villages
through commitment
made in the ESC fund
meant for the
Community Welfare
Programme (phase
wise manner).
• All the developmental
activities will be
carried out in
consultation with
Village Panchayat/TDO
and collector.
• The Primary Schools
will be provided with
educational aids &
uniforms at regular
interval by the project
proponent.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 166
Name of Participant
Designation
Village Date Issues/Requirements
Discussed Measures Proposed
areas and provision of major
garbage.
• Promotion of Sports activities in
Dahej GIDC areas with sports
complex.
• Construction of RCC roads with
communities’ hall up to
Bhootnath Mandir, which is
place of religious importance for
the surrounding areas
population.
Mr. Pravinbhai J Chavada (Sanjay Chavada Mobile
No. 9909015134)
Mr. Nand Sinh Gohil (Mobile No.
9925222961)
Mr. Kanubhai Gohil (Mobile No.
8511103241)
Mr. Budhabhai Gohil (Mobile
No.9974724236)
Mr. Gamil Sangh Padhiyar (Mobile No. 9727720757)
Mr. Vipulbhai Kokani
Sarpanch
Head Master (Govt.
Prathamik Shala)
Ambetha 23/6/2017
29/03/2017 • Construction of Adivasis House-
200 Nos. (1 Room Kitchen)
• Beautification of Village
Panchayat Pond with seating
arrangement and Solar Light
provison.
• Requirement of Wi-fie facilities
and Gymnastics Equipment for
villagers.
• Job Opportunities for the
qualified youth of Ambetha
village.
• Repair of roof of the school
building.
• Requirement with respect to the
school and the students are as
follows:-
• School Uniform (200 Nos.)
• Distribution of School Bags &
Shoes (200 Nos.)
• Sports Equipment
• Color Printer
• Cordless Mike 2
• Fridge & Water Cooler (1 No’s)
• Sitting mats for children
• Provision of 1 teacher from
company’s Pay Roll.
Source: Community Consultation- March 2017
The above table reveals that major issues in the communities are inadequate supply of drinking water, open
defecation, unemployment etc.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 167
4.12 Occupational Health and Risk to Surrounding Communities
Due to storage tank and pipeline Leakage of Hazardous Chemicals
This includes,
Hazards Identification,
Selection of Potential Loss Scenarios,
Simulation of release source model, and
Plotting of contour maps
A detailed risk assessment and consequence analysis study is presented in chapter 7 i.e. Additional Studies of this
report (please refer Section).
On the basis of that study MLCs (as shown in Table 7-4), have been selected and studied. On the basis of the
outcomes of the study a detailed impact scoring was under taken and presented in Table 4-25, including the
following general safety measures and mitigation measures.
4.12.1 Hazard Identification and Proposed Safety Measures
M/s DPL have selected world class licensors like UOP and KBR for cumene and phenol plant who have unmatched
record in terms of health, environment and safety. The technology takes care of any hazard emanating from the
process by constant up-gradation and high level of automation. The process inherently has various safety features
like interlock systems, PSV’s, optimized operating conditions, spent air treatment, scrubbers, incinerator etc. which
ensures the protection of personnel, machinery and also the surrounding environment.
Proposed safety measures adopted are;
Thorough HAZOP study for both cumene and phenol plants was successfully conducted separately to
identify potential hazards which can arise in the process and provide any safeguards.
A well designed fire network shall be designed to take care of fire related accidents in any section of the
plant.
High level of automation shall be there to minimize operator intervention and also advanced and improved
technology to maintain the integrity of the system.
Proper Alarm system shall be provided at various levels to alert the operator before shut down of the plant.
Necessary interlocks shall be provided in various sections of the plant to safely shutdown the unit in case
of any emergency.
Utility stations having supply of potable water and nitrogen, safety showers shall be provided at various
locations in the plant to aid in event of accident.
The equipment used in the plant shall be designed as per the latest norms of API, ASTM etc. to ensure the
integrity of the equipment. Equipment layout shall be as per guidelines stipulated in OISD, PESO etc.
Gas detectors are installed in various sections of the plant to alert the operator in case if any leakage.
Storage area shall be classified as Class A, Class B and Class C storage to separate the licensed area from
the other areas.
Adequate safety measures shall be provided in the tank farm areas and storage tanks to minimize any
chances of emission and accident.
Storage tanks for chemicals shall be selected on the basis of properties of the same like IFRT with double
seal for benzene,
The personnel working in the plant shall be equipped with all the necessary PPE’s for safety.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 168
Table 4-27: Impact Scoring of Occupational Health, Community Health and Safety
Code Impacting Activity Impact Scoring
Basis of Scoring Mitigation Measures C P C × P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
1 Acetone Leak -2 2 -4 C=2 as Flash point is low
P=2 as sufficient safety measures
Breather valve, gas detectors, foam chamber, deluge system, Nitrogen blanketing, vent condenser to arrest the
release of VOC and dual level indicators
2 Hydrogen Leak -3 1 -3
C=3 as highly flammable gas
P=1 as hydrogen is transferred through pipeline
Transferred through pipeline so risk is low
3 Benzene Leak -3 2 -6
C=3 as low flash point and toxic liquid
P=2 as sufficient safety measures provided
Internally floating roof tanks for Benzene
Dual level indicators for avoiding overflow.
Gas detector, deluge system, foam chamber
4 Phenol Leak -2 2 -4 C=2 as flammable and toxic liquid
P=2 as sufficient safety
Dual level indicators for avoiding overflow.
Breather valve, foam chamber, gas detector, nitrogen blanketing and dual level indicators
5 Propylene Leak -3 1 -3 C=3 as Highly Flammable gas
P=1 because mounded bullet
Mounded Bullet
Nitrogen blanketing and breather valves
Deluge System
Gas Detectors
6 Cumene Leak -2 2 -4 C=2 as Flash point is low
P=1 as sufficient safety measures
Dual level indicators for avoiding overflow.
Breather valve, gas detectors, foam chamber, deluge system, nitrogen blanketing and dual level indicators
C: Consequence; P: Probability; C x P: Final Score
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 169
5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (Technology & Site)
This is proposed expansion at existing site. Hence this exercise is not required.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 170
6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
6.1 Environmental Monitoring Programme
Environment monitoring program is given in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1: Environment Monitoring Program
S. No. Activity Schedule
Air Pollution Monitoring
1 Ambient air monitoring of parameters specified by GPCB in their air
consents from time to time within the premises Once in Month or as per EC and CTO
2 Stack Monitoring of process stacks/ vents & flue gas stacks as given in
air consent from time to time Once in Month or as per EC and CTO
3 Ambient air monitoring of parameters specified by GPCB in their air
consents from time to time at stations outside the premises Once in Month or as per EC and CTO
4 Work Place Monitoring Once in quarter
Water Pollution Monitoring
1 Monitoring of water consumed in various activities and waste water
generated from various areas of plants Daily
2 Monitoring of wastewater inlet and outlet at ETP plant for the principal
parameters (such as pH, SS, TDS, COD, BOD). Daily
3 Monitoring of other parameters as per PCB consent conditions in outlet
of ETP Waste Water Once in every month or as per EC and
CTO
4 Monitoring of STP inlet and outlet for the parameters (such as, pH,
COD, BOD, TDS & SS) Daily
5 Monitoring of ground water samples at site. Parameters are essential
parameters as per IS: 10500:2012. Once in a year
Noise Quality Monitoring
1 Work Place Noise Monitoring Once in six months
2 Ambient Noise Monitoring Once in six months
Solid Waste Generation Monitoring/Record Keeping
1 Monitoring of solid / hazardous waste generated from process and ETP
area. Quarterly
2 Records of generation of Solid / Hazardous Wastes Daily
3 Record of storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid /
hazardous wastes to recyclers, Reprocessor, and CTDF. Daily
Environmental Statement
1 Environmental Statement under EP(Act) 1986 Once in a year
Soil Monitoring Plan
Table 6-2: Environmental Monitoring Plan-Soil Pollution
S. No.
Potential Impact Action Parameters for
Monitoring Parameters for Monitoring Timings
1 Soil Erosion Level the land by cutting &
filling or by importing soil from out side
Soil WHC & porosity Prior to vegetation & site
clearance as well as completion of work
2 Soil contamination Control spillage of
construction materials EC, pH and ESP (exchangeable
sodium per cent) Completion of
construction work
3 Soil contamination
Use of ETP waste water for landscape
EC, pH and ESP (exchangeable sodium per cent)
Before plantation & once in a year post monsoon
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 171
Ecological Monitoring Plan
The plantations need to be managed by regular watering, soil enrichment work, applying manure, weeding
and provide proper protection.
Replacement of sapling (replanting) required whenever mortality occurs in the plantation during the growth
stage.
Plantation requires after care for a period of minimum five years till the saplings attain matured tree stage.
Any damage to the developed greenbelt due to any natural or cattle activity should be redeveloped and maintained
by the agency.
6.2 Regulatory Framework
The following EHS regulatory requirements are applicable to the activities being planned, and the checklist given in
Table 6-3 may be taken into consideration prior to actual commencement of operations. This checklist requires to
be reviewed at quarterly intervals.
Table 6-3: Applicable EHS Regulatory Requirements
S.
No. Applicable Legislation / Rule / Permit Requirement
Action Required /
Timing of Action
1 Environmental Clearance as per the EIA Notification dated 14th Sept 2006 and
amended till date Permit to establish facility
Before commencement of the project
2 Consent to Establish/ NOC from the GPCB
under water and air act Permit to establish facility
Before commencement of the project
3 Consent to Operate under the Air Act from
the GPCB
Permit to discharge air emissions from the flue gas stacks and process vents
Application to be filed with the GPCB once the EC and NOC is
obtained after the commencement of the project
4 Consent to Operate under the Water Act
from the GPCB
Permit to generate/discharge wastewater resulting from the
project activities
Application to be filed with the GPCB once the EC and NOC is
obtained after the commencement of the project
5 Authorization to generate, transport and dispose hazardous wastes from the GPCB
Permit to generate and dispose hazardous wastes
Application to be filed with the GPCB once the EC and NOC is
obtained after the commencement of the project
6 Applicable permits from the CCoE, Nagpur
for storage of explosive / flammable material
Requirements of permits to be ascertained prior to
establishment of facilities.
Application to be filed and required permits to be obtained.
7 The Manufacture, Storage and Import of
Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989 (as amended till date)
Listing of hazardous materials; thresholds against which Safety Audit and Safety Report has to be maintained; Requirements of
disclosure of information; Availability of MSDS’
If required, safety audit and safety report to be prepared as per
Gujarat Factories Act.
8 The Public Liability Act, 1991 (PLI) Insurance to be taken Unit will take insurance under PLI
9 Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness and Response) Rules, 1996
Preparation of Local/District Level Crisis groups, for management of offsite
emergencies.
Identify whether Local or District Level Crisis Groups exist and take proactive part in preparing Offsite
DMP.
10 Factory License from the DISH
(Department of Industrial Safety Health) License to run the Factory
Application prior to construction and also commissioning
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 172
7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES
7.1 Public Consultation
It will included after public hearing.
7.2 Risk Assessment (Hazard Identification and Consequence Analysis)
7.2.1 Background
Key issues in Risk Assessment (RA) of the expansion of Synthetic Organic chemical based processing and
Petrochemical based processing unit (M/s Deepak Phenolics Limited.) i.e. Category 5 (f) & 5(e) of the Schedule to
the EIA Notification dated Sept. 14, 2006 (amended till date), for proposed manufacturing activities are discussed in
this chapter. The risk assessment process is intended to identify probable hazards in the work environment and all
operations, to quantify the hazards and to assess the risk levels of those hazards in order to prioritize those that
need an immediate attention.
In the unlikely event that an abnormal consequence has occurred, the disaster management kicks in. This includes
prescribing the procedures pertaining to a number of issues such as communication, encounter, rescue,
rehabilitation and further steps to prevent recurrence of such consequence in future. These issues are addressed in
the disaster management plan.
Both, the RA and DMP are living documents and need to be updated whenever there are changes in operations,
equipment or procedures.
7.2.2 Key Definitions
The terminologies used in this Risk Assessment (RA) study are defined below.
Consequence: Magnitude or size of the damage or loss. In terms of health and safety, it is the degree of harm
that could be caused to the people exposed to hazard, the potential severity of injuries or ill health, and/or the
number of people who could be potentially affected. Consequence of hazard need not only be in terms of human
safety criteria, but could also be in terms of a financial loss due to production and incurred costs due to
repairs/replacement, environmental impacts as well as public outrage.
Disaster: A catastrophic consequence of a major emergency/accident that leads to not only extensive damage to
life and property, but also disrupts all normal human activity for a significant period of time and requires a major
national and/or international effort for rescue and rehabilitation of those affected.
Emergency: A situation of process deviation that, if uncontrolled, may lead to a major accident/disaster with
potential short term and/or long term risk damage consequence to life and property in and/or around the
workplace.
Emergency Response Planning Guidelines1 (EPRG1): The maximum airborne concentration below which it is
believed that nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to 1 hour (without a respirator) without experiencing
other than mild transient adverse health effects or without perceiving a clearly defined objectionable odour.
Emergency Response Planning Guidelines2 (ERPG2): The maximum airborne concentration below which it is
believed that nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to 1 hour without experiencing or developing irreversible
or other serious health effects or symptoms that could impair their abilities to take protective action.
Emergency Response Planning Guidelines3 (ERPG3): The maximum airborne concentration below which it is
believed nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to 1 hour without experiencing or developing life-threatening
health effects.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 173
Hazard: Source of potential harm, injury or loss to man and machines.
Immediately Dangerous to life and health (IDLH): It represents the maximum concentration of a chemical
from which, in the event of respiratory failure, one could escape within 30 minutes without a respirator and without
experiencing any escape/impairing (e.g. severe irritation) or irreversible health effects.
Lethal Concentration Low (LCLo): It is the lowest concentration of a material in air, other than LC50, which has
been reported to cause death in human or animals.
Risk: Combination of the likelihood of a specific unwanted event and the potential consequences, if it occurs.
Risk Assessment: A process that involves estimation and measurement of risk to determine priorities and to
enable identification of appropriate level of risk treatment (used also to describe the overall process of risk
management).
Risk Control: Implementation of strategies to prevent, control and minimize hazards.
Risk Management: Overall description of the steps taken to manage risk, by identifying hazards and
implementing controls in the workplace.
Risk Rating: The category, level, or risk assigned following risk assessment (e.g. High, Medium, or Low).
Threshold Limit Value (TLV): it is the permitted level of exposure for a given period on a weighted average
basis (usually 8 hrs for 5 days in a week)
Short Time Exposure Limit (STEL): it is the permitted short-term exposure limit usually for a 15 minutes
exposure.
Toxic Concentration Low (TCLo): It is the lowest concentration of a material in air, to which humans or animals
have been exposed for any given period of time that has produced a toxic effects in humans or produced
carcinogenic, neoplastigenic or tetratogenic effect in humans or animals.
7.2.3 Methodology for Risk Assessment
The methodology includes,
1. Hazard identification,
2. Selection of potential loss scenarios,
3. Simulation of release source model on DNV’s PHAST 7.0,
4. Plotting the damage contour on site map
These steps undertaken to carry out risk assessment for this project are described in following sections.
7.2.4 Hazard Identification
The project description, and other project related data provided by the client have been comprehensively reviewed
to identify the hazardous operations. Also the information on the hazardous properties (MSDS) of all the chemicals
handled at the site has been reviewed to identify the hazards associated with the same.
At present DPL is going to set up an synthetic organic chemicals manufacturing facility with a maximum production
capacity of 60,000 MTPA. This involves storage of some of the raw material at the site which can lead to
uncontrolled release of hazardous material causing hazard. On the basis of this, the important hazards that can lead
to accident in the proposed project are described in Table 7-1.
Table 7-1: Important Hazardous Events
Type of Event Explanation
BLEVE
Boiling Liquid Evaporating Vapor Explosion; may happen due to catastrophic failure of refrigerated or
pressurized gases or liquids stored above their boiling points, followed by early ignition of the same,
typically leading to a fire ball
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 174
Type of Event Explanation
Deflagration Is the same as detonation but with reaction occurring at less than sonic velocity and initiation of the
reaction at lower energy levels
Detonation A propagating chemical reaction of a substance in which the reaction front advances in the
unreacted substance at or greater than sonic velocity in the unreacted material
Explosion A release of large amount of energy that form a blast wave
Fire Fire
Fireball
The burning of a flammable gas cloud on being immediately ignited at the edge before forming a
flammable/explosive mixture.
Flash Fire A flammable gas release gets ignited at the farthest edge resulting in flash-back fire
Jet Fire
A jet fire occurs when flammable gas releases from the pipeline (or hole) and the released gas
ignites immediately. Damage distance depends on the operating pressure and the diameter of the
hole or opening flow rate.
Pool Fire Pool fire is a turbulent diffusion fire burning above a horizontal pool of vaporizing hydrocarbon fuel,
where the fuel has zero or low initial momentum
Spill Release ‘Loss of containment’. Release of fluid or gas to the surroundings from unit’s own equipment / tanks
causing (potential) pollution and / or risk of explosion and / or fire
Structural Damage Breakage or fatigue failures (mostly failures caused by weather but not necessarily) of structural
support and direct structural failures
Vapor Cloud Explosion Explosion resulting from vapor clouds formed from flashing liquids or non-flashing liquids and gases
Hazard and Damage Assessment
Toxic, flammable and explosive substances released from sources of storage as a result of failures or catastrophes,
can cause losses in the surrounding area in the form of:
Toxic gas dispersion, resulting in toxic levels in ambient air,
Fires, fireballs, and flash back fires, resulting in a heat wave (radiation), or
Explosions (Vapours Cloud Explosions) resulting in blast waves (overpressure).
Consequences of Fire/Heat Wave
The effect of thermal radiation on people is mainly a function of intensity of radiation and exposure time. The effect
is expressed in term of the probability of death and different degree of burn. The consequence effects studied to
assess the impact of the events on the receptors are provided in Table 7-2.
Table 7-2 : Damage due to Radiation Intensity
Radiation (kW/m2) Damage to Equipment Damage to People
4.0 - Causes pain if duration is longer than 20 sec. But
blistering is unlikely.
12.5 Minimum energy to ignite wood with a
flame; melts plastic tubing.
1% lethality in one minute. First degree burns in 10
sec.
37.5 Severe damage to plant
100% lethality in 1 min.
50% lethality in 20 sec.
1% lethality in 10 sec.
Consequences of Overpressure
The effects of the shock wave vary depending on the characteristics of the material, the quantity involved and the
degree of confinement of the vapor cloud. The peak pressures in an explosion therefore vary between a slight over-
pressure and a few hundred kilopascals (kPa). Whereas dwelling are demolished and windows and doors broken at
overpressures as low as 0.03- 0.1 bar. Direct injury to people occurs at greater pressures. The pressure of the
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 175
shock wave decreases rapidly with the increase in distance from the source of the explosion. The overpressure
damage is shown in Table 7-3.
Table 7-3: Overpressure Damage
Overpressure (bar) Damage
0.02068 Limited minor structural damage
0.068 to 0.136
Corrugated asbestos shattered; corrugated steel or aluminum
panels, fastenings fail, followed by buckling, wood panels (standard
housing) fastenings fail, panels blown in
0.204 to 0.272 Frameless, self -framing steel panel building demolished; rupture of oil storage tanks
Source: CCPS Consequence Analysis of Chemical Release
Consequences of Toxic Release
The effect of exposure to toxic substance depends upon the duration of exposure and the concentration of the toxic
substance.
Short-term exposures to high concentration give Acute Effects while long term exposures to low concentrations
result in Chronic Effects.
Only acute effects are considered under hazard analysis, since they are likely credible scenarios. These effects are:
Irritation (respiratory system, skin, eyes)
Narcosis (nervous system)
Asphyxiation (oxygen deficiency)
System damage (blood organs)
7.2.5 Selection of Maximum Credible Loss Scenarios (MCLs’)
Following important points should be considered for the selection of release scenarios.
Flammability and the flash point of the material
Phase of material i.e. liquid or gas
Threshold quantity of the chemicals as prescribed in MSHIC Rule
Operating temperature and pressure of the material
Total inventory of the material
On the basis of study of chemical properties (MSDS) of the chemicals those are selected for simulation are
presented Table 7-4. Properties of these chemicals are given in Table 2-11.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 176
Table 7-4: Storage Details of Hazardous Material
S.
No.
Containment
(Vessel)
Flash
Point
(°C)
IDLH
(PPM)
Max.
Storage
Capacity
(MT)
No. of
Storage
Vessels
Total Storage
Capacity (MT)
Dyke
Pressure Temperature Height,
m Area, m2
1 Acetone -16.99 2500 3079 2 6158 1.8 6750.76 Atm. Amb.
2 Benzene -11.11 500 4023 2 8046 1.8 6750.76 Atm. Amb.
3 Phenol 79 250 4276 2 8552 2 2795 Atm. Amb.
4 Propylene -162 2000 4293 2 8586 NA NA Atm. 18-22
5 Cumene 31 900 6927 1 6927 1.8 6750.76 Atm. Amb.
6 Hydrogen NA NA 2500 Nm3/hr 1 2500 Nm3/hr NA NA Atm. 50
On the basis of the information provided in Table 7-4, and as discussed over failures sceneries given in publications like World Bank Technical Paper 55 and TNO
Purple Book and the experience of the consultant, MCLs’ which may take place are presented in Table 7-5.
Table 7-5: Scenario Selected for Simulation
S. No. Containment (Vessel) Types of Failure Possible Consequences Studied
1 Acetone 10 mm dia hole leak in tank, 20 mm dia hole leak in tank and Catastrophic Rupture Jet Fire, Pool Fire & Explosion
2 Benzene 10 mm dia hole leak in tank, 20 mm dia hole leak in tank and Catastrophic Rupture Jet Fire, Pool Fire & Explosion
3 Phenol 10 mm dia hole leak in tank, 20 mm dia hole leak in tank and Catastrophic Rupture Jet Fire, Pool Fire & Explosion
4 Propylene 10 mm dia hole leak in tank, 20 mm dia hole leak in tank and Catastrophic Rupture Jet Fire, Pool Fire & Explosion
5 Cumene 10 mm dia hole leak in tank, 20 mm dia hole leak in tank and Catastrophic Rupture Jet Fire, Pool Fire & Explosion
6 Hydrogen 10 mm dia hole leak in tank, 25 mm dia hole leak in tank and Catastrophic Rupture Jet Fire, Fire ball & Explosion
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 177
Failure Rates
A leak or rupture of a tank, release some or all of its content, can be caused by brittle failure of the tank wall, welds or
connected pipework due to use of inadequate materials, combined with loading such as wind, earthquake or impact.
Failure rates for selected MCLS’ are provided in Table 7-6.
Table 7-6: Failure Frequency for Storage Tanks
Categories
Catastrophic Rupture
Frequency
(per tank per year)
Leak Frequency (per year)
Refrigerated Storage Tank (Single Wall) 2.3 × 10-5 1.0 × 10-5
Refrigerated Storage Tank
(Double Walled) 2.5 × 10-8
1.0 × 10-5
(for primary containment)
Atmospheric Storage Tank 3.0 × 10-6 2.8× 10-3
Pressure Vessels 4.7 × 10-7 1.2 × 10-5 (for Hole Size 3 to 10 mm)
7.1 × 10-6 (for Hole Size 10 to 50 mm)
Reference: International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP); Report No. 434-3, March 2010
Also, the risk assessment is considered using certain internationally recognized yardsticks for measuring risk. These first
need to be explained, and this is done as Table 7-7.
Table 7-7: Broadly Accepted Frequency
Annual Fatality risk level
per year Conclusion
10-3 Unacceptable to everyone. Immediate action shall be taken to reduce the hazards
10-4 Willing to spend public money to control hazards, such as traffic signs, fire departments etc.
10-5 People still recognize as risk. Safety slogans have precautionary rings. Such as never swim
alone, never point a gun
10-6 Not of great concern to everyone. People are aware of these hazards but feel that they cannot
happen to them. Such as Lightning Never Strikes twice an Act of God.
7.2.6 Simulation of Release and Development of Contours
As the MCLS’ were developed for the selected set of chemicals, the next step is to carry out the consequence analysis.
The consequence analysis results along with their contours are presented in the following sections.
Acetone
Radiation level and effect distance due to the release of Acetone are presented in Table 7-8, whereas the
overpressure effect distance are presented in Table 7-9.
Table 7-8: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Acetone
Chemical
(Storage Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence
Met
Data
Effective Distance in meter to Radiation Level
4 kW/m2 12.5 kW/m2 37.5 kW/m2
Acetone 10 mm leak Jet fire
2/E 6 4 NR
3/B 5 4 NR
5/D 5 4 NR
Late pool fire 2/E 31 20 10
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 178
Chemical
(Storage Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence
Met
Data
Effective Distance in meter to Radiation Level
4 kW/m2 12.5 kW/m2 37.5 kW/m2
3/B 30 20 10
5/D 30 21 10
20 mm leak
Jet fire
2/E 11 9 NR
3/B 11 8 NR
5/D 10 8 7
Late pool fire
2/E 60 39 20
3/B 59 38 21
5/D 58 39 22
Catastrophic
Rupture Late pool fire
2/E 232 146 87
3/B 235 150 93
5/D 236 153 101
Table 7-9: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Acetone
Chemical (Storage
Tank) Failure Scenario Consequence Met Data
Overpressure Distances in Meters
0.02 0.21 1.00
Acetone
10mm Leak Late Ignition
2/E 25 13 11
3/B 21 12 11
5/D
20mm Leak Late Ignition
2/E 54 27 23
3/B 23 13 11
5/D 19 12 11
Catastrophic
rupture Late Ignition
2/E 500 232 201
3/B 408 180 166
5/D 409 190 178
The contours for effect distance generated for the release of Acetone are presented in Figure 7-1 to Figure 7-4
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 179
Figure 7-1: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Acetone due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E
Figure 7-2: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Acetone due to 20mm leak leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E
Figure 7-3: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Acetone due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 180
Figure 7-4: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Acetone due to Catastrophic Rupture at Weather Condition
2/E
Benzene
Radiation level and effect distance due to the release of Benzene are presented in Table 7-10, whereas the
overpressure effect distance are presented in Table 7-11 whereas distance to Equivalent Toxic Dose due to release of
Ethylene Oxide are given in Table 7-12.
Table 7-10: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Benzene
Chemical
(Storage Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence
Met
Data
Effective Distance in meter to Radiation Level
4 kW/m2 12.5 kW/m2 37.5 kW/m2
Benzene
10 mm leak
Jet fire
2/E 4 NR NR
3/B 3 2 NR
5/D 3 2 NR
Late pool fire
2/E 36 20 9
3/B 36 22 9
5/D 37 25 9
20 mm leak
Jet fire
2/E 7 6 NR
3/B 7 5 4
5/D 6 5 4
Late pool fire
2/E 47 20 NR
3/B 49 21 NR
5/D 51 23 NR
Catastrophic
Rupture Late pool fire
2/E 113 47 NR
3/B 122 48 NR
5/D 132 50 NR
Table 7-11: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Benzene
Chemical (Storage
Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence Met Data
Overpressure Distances in Meters
0.02 0.21 1.00
Benzene 10 mm leak Late Ignition 2/E 27 13 11
3/B 22 12 11
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 181
Chemical (Storage
Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence Met Data
Overpressure Distances in Meters
0.02 0.21 1.00
5/D
20 mm leak Late Ignition
2/E 57 27 23
3/B 50 26 22
5/D 21 12 11
Catastrophic
rupture Late Ignition
2/E 441 206 182
3/B 359 164 155
5/D 346 160 148
Table 7-12: Distance to Equivalent Toxic Dose due to Release of Benzene
Chemical
(Storage
Tank)
Failure Scenario Met Data
Effective Distance in meter to Toxic Level
EPRG 1
(50 ppm)
EPRG 2
(150 ppm)
EPRG 3
(1000 ppm)
IDLH
(500 ppm)
Benzene
10 mm leak
2/E 221 110 30 271
3/B 65 39 19 76
5/D 87 46 12 104
20 mm leak
2/E 404 193 48 495
3/B 119 70 32 141
5/D 174 89 30 207
Catastrophic Rupture
2/E 2984 1266 260 3814
3/B 665 313 115 825
5/D 1154 468 104 1471
The contours for effect distance generated for the release of Benzene are presented in Figure 7-5 to Figure 7-8.
Figure 7-5: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Benzene due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 5/D
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 182
Figure 7-6: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Benzene due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E
Figure 7-7: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Benzene due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 5/D
Figure 7-8: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Benzene due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 183
Phenol
Radiation level and effect distance due to the release of Phenol are presented in Table 7-13, whereas the
overpressure effect distance are presented in Table 7-14 whereas distance to Equivalent Toxic Dose due to release of
Ethylene Oxide are given in Table 7-15.
Table 7-13: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Phenol
Chemical
(Storage Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence
Met
Data
Effective Distance in meter to Radiation Level
4 kW/m2 12.5 kW/m2 37.5 kW/m2
Phenol
10 mm leak
Jet fire
2/E NR NR NR
3/B NR NR NR
5/D NR NR NR
Late pool fire
2/E 32 19 11
3/B 33 21 11
5/D 34 23 11
20 mm leak
Jet fire
2/E NR NR NR
3/B NR NR NR
5/D NR NR NR
Late pool fire
2/E 44 21 NR
3/B 46 22 NR
5/D 48 23 NR
Catastrophic
Rupture Late pool fire
2/E 99 47 NR
3/B 104 48 NR
5/D 109 50 NR
Table 7-14: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Phenol
Chemical (Storage
Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence Met Data
Overpressure Distances in Meters
0.02 0.21 1.00
Phenol Catastrophic
rupture Late Ignition
2/E 57 27 23
3/B 59 28 23
5/D 55 27 23
Table 7-15: Distance to Equivalent Toxic Dose due to Release of Phenol
Chemical
(Storage Tank) Failure Scenario Met Data
Effective Distance in meter to Toxic Level
EPRG 1
(10 ppm)
EPRG 2
(50 ppm)
EPRG 3
(200 ppm)
IDLH
(250 ppm)
Phenol
10 mm leak
2/E 37 4 4 9
3/B 11 2 2 2
5/D 12 2 2 2
20 mm leak
2/E 207 104 25 47
3/B 45 33 21 26
5/D 40 20 11 15
Catastrophic
Rupture
2/E 535 50 18 20
3/B 89 21 16 18
5/D 100 21 16 18
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 184
The contours for effect distance generated for the release of Phenol are presented in Figure 7-9 to Figure 7-15.
Figure 7-9: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Phenol due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 5/D
Figure 7-10: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Phenol due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 5/D
Figure 7-11: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Phenol due to Catastrophic Rupture of Storage Tank at
Weather Condition 5/D
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 185
Figure 7-12: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Phenol due to Catastrophic Rupture at Weather Condition
3/B
Figure 7-13: Risk contour for Maximum concentration of Phenol in the environment due to 10mm leak in
Phenol Storage tank at weather condition 2/E
Figure 7-14: Risk contour for Maximum concentration of Phenol in the environment due to 20mm leak in
Phenol Storage tank at weather condition 2/E
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 186
Figure 7-15: Risk contour for Maximum concentration of Phenol in the environment due to Catastrophic
Rupture of Phenol Storage tank at weather condition 2/E
Propylene
Radiation level and effect distance due to the release of Propylene are presented in Table 7-16, whereas the
overpressure effect distance are presented in Table 7-17.
Table 7-16: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Propylene
Chemical (Storage
Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence
Met
Data
Effective Distance in meter to Radiation Level
4 kW/m2 12.5 kW/m2 37.5 kW/m2
Propylene
10 mm leak Jet fire
2/E 36 28 24
3/B 34 27 22
5/D 32 25 20
20 mm leak Jet fire
2/E 67 53 45
3/B 64 50 42
5/D 61 46 38
Catastrophic
Rupture Fireball
2/E 2372 1299 539
3/B 2372 1299 539
5/D 2372 1299 539
Table 7-17: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Propylene
Chemical (Storage
Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence Met Data
Overpressure Distances in Meters
0.02 0.21 1.00
Propylene
10 mm leak Late Ignition
2/E 72 46 43
3/B 59 36 32
5/D 58 36 32
20 mm leak Late Ignition
2/E 175 115 106
3/B 168 113 105
5/D 168 113 105
Late Ignition 2/E 4013 1018 664
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 187
Chemical (Storage
Tank)
Failure
Scenario Consequence Met Data
Overpressure Distances in Meters
0.02 0.21 1.00
Catastrophic
rupture
3/B 3955 1000 626
5/D 4098 1137 947
The contours for effect distance generated for the release of Propylene are presented in Figure 7-16 to Figure 7-19
Figure 7-16: Jet Fire Consequence Contour of Propylene due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E
Figure 7-17: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Propylene due to 10 mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E
Figure 7-18: Jet Fire Consequence Contour of Propylene due to 20mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 188
Figure 7-19: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Propylene due to 20 mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 2/E
Cumene
Radiation level and effect distance due to the release of Cumene are presented in Table 7-18, whereas the
overpressure effect distance are presented in Table 7-19.
Table 7-18: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Cumene
Chemical (Storage Tank)
Failure Scenario
Consequence Met Data Effective Distance in meter to Radiation Level
4 kW/m2 12.5 kW/m2 37.5 kW/m2
Cumene
10 mm leak
Jet fire
2/E NR NR NR
3/B NR NR NR
5/D NR NR NR
Late pool fire
2/E 65 41 24
3/B 65 42 27
5/D 65 44 29
20 mm leak Jet fire
2/E 1 NR NR
3/B 1 NR NR
5/D 1 NR NR
Late pool fire 2/E 121 76 46
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 189
Chemical (Storage Tank)
Failure Scenario
Consequence Met Data Effective Distance in meter to Radiation Level
4 kW/m2 12.5 kW/m2 37.5 kW/m2
3/B 121 77 49
5/D 121 79 53
Catastrophic Rupture
Late pool fire
2/E 321 199 123
3/B 323 202 130
5/D 323 207 137
Table 7-19: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Cumene
Chemical (Storage Tank)
Failure Scenario
Consequence Met Data Overpressure Distances in Meters
0.02 0.21 1.00
Cumene Catastrophic
rupture Late Ignition
2/E 71 30 24
3/B 77 31 25
5/D 70 30 24
The contours for effect distance generated for the release of Cumene are presented in Figure 7-20 to Figure 7-22
Figure 7-20: Late Pool Consequence Contour of Cumene due to 10mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 5/D
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 190
Figure 7-21: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Cumene due to 20 mm leak in Storage Tank at Weather
Condition 3/B
Figure 7-22: Late Explosion Consequence Contour of Cumene due to Catastrophic Rupture at Weather
Condition 3/B
7.2.7 Conclusion
From the above study following conclusion can be made.
Table 7-20: Maximum Distance of 20 mm Leak
Chemical Effect Distance in Meters at Weather condition 5.0/D
At Radiation Level 4 kW/m2 due to Late Pool Fire ERPG 3
Acetone 58 -
Benzene 51 30
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 191
Chemical Effect Distance in Meters at Weather condition 5.0/D
At Radiation Level 4 kW/m2 due to Late Pool Fire ERPG 3
Phenol 48 11
Propylene - -
Cumene 121 -
Table 7-21: Maximum Distance of Catastrophic Rupture
Chemical
Effect Distance in Meters at Weather condition 5.0/D
At Radiation Level 4 kW/m2 due to
Late Pool Fire
At Overpressure 0.02 bar due to Late
Ignition ERPG 3
Acetone 236 409 -
Benzene 132 346 104
Phenol 109 55 16
Propylene - 4098 -
Cumene 323 70 -
7.2.8 Risk Assessment for Pipeline
Hydrogen
Radiation level and effect distance due to the release of Hydrogen are presented in Table 7-22, whereas the
overpressure effect distance are presented in Table 7-23.
Table 7-22: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Hydrogen
Chemical Failure
Scenario Consequence Met Data
Effective Distance in meter to Radiation Level
4 kW/m2 12.5 kW/m2 37.5 kW/m2
Hydrogen
10 mm leak Jet fire
2/E 12 9 NR
3/B 13 10 NR
5/D 13 11 NR
25 mm leak Jet fire
2/E 31 24 18
3/B 32 25 19
5/D 32 26 22
Catastrophic
Rupture Fire Ball Ellipse
2/E 483 265 121
3/B 483 265 121
5/D 483 265 121
Table 7-23: Overpressure Effect Distance due to Release of Hydrogen
Chemical Failure
Scenario Consequence Met Data
Overpressure Distances in Meters
0.02 0.21 1.00
Hydrogen Pipeline
10 mm leak Late Ignition
2/E 36 15 12
3/B 34 15 12
5/D 33 15 12
25 mm leak Late Ignition 2/E 107 53 45
3/B 90 42 35
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 192
Chemical Failure
Scenario Consequence Met Data
Overpressure Distances in Meters
0.02 0.21 1.00
5/D 89 42 35
Catastrophic
rupture Late Ignition
2/E 989 258 165
3/B 982 256 165
5/D 992 271 195
7.3 Disaster Management Plan
7.3.1 Objective
The objectives of the plan are as follows;
1. To provide resource and methods for effective control of emergencies arising out of leakage, explosion and fire due
to hazardous chemicals.
2. To prevent the emergency turning into a disaster.
3. Synchronized action from all the coordinating agencies with least possible delay.
4. To minimize damages to the property, people and environment.
5. Effective rescue operation and treatment of the causalities.
6. To train the people to act efficiently and with confidence in an emergency.
7. To bring back normal situation in the least possible time.
8. To provide authorities information to the news media and Govt. Agencies.
9. To minimize its occurrence.
7.3.2 Mode of Emergencies
An emergency is an extra-ordinary administrative situation, which is not confronted by the administration in its routine.
It could also be defined as an event that causes a temporary break in the normal life of an industry or community.
Term such as disaster, emergency, or Natural calamity etc. is also used depending on the particular context and the
circumstances, however, by and large, this is a question of interpretation only and the terms are interchangeable.
The emergency can be broadly classified as natural or man-made, according to origin creator. The type of emergency
can be identified as given in Figure 7-23.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 193
Figure 7-23: Types of Emergencies
7.3.3 Fire & Explosion
Fire ranks first among the major hazards in the operational Plant. Major fires arise out of leakages of flammable
materials from the system and their getting ignited from some source of ignition & it may turn into large scale of fire.
In case of large discharge of flammable material formation of vapour clouds, the cloud travelling to another location
and causing a fire or explosion is possible. This poses danger threat to communities nearby or even at some distance.
The damage in both cases could be extensive. One of the hazards identified in our system is a potential leakage of Oil
& Gas from the Plant.
Another danger from fire is that when flammable material get ignited, there is the possibility of release of combustion
gas (being toxic) in large quantities. Major fire with no danger of explosion hazards form prolonged high levels of
thermal radiation heat & smoke.
7.3.4 Major Accident & Dangerous Occurrences
Flammable Gas Release
If Flammable gas leaks/ releases and come into contact with any source of ignition, like spark, frication, static charge,
hot surface, it may explode and may result into fire, blast wave radiation heat.
Oil Leakage
Hydrocarbon leaks from operational plant are very danger and it can lead to a major fire in the Plant. Other units within
the plant then process each of those components into different products, including Phenol & other flammable materials.
Serious Bodily Injury/Fall from Height
“Serious Bodily injury” means an injury, which involve, or in all probability will involve, the permanent loss of the use of,
or permanent injury to, any limb or the permanent loss, of or, injury to, sight or hearing or the fracture of any bone,
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 194
but shall not include the fracture of bone or joint (not being fracture of more than one bone or joint) of any phalanges
of the hand or foot.
Tsunami
Tsunamis are water waves or seismic sea waves caused by large-scale sudden movement of the sea floor, usually due
to earthquakes and on rare occasions to landslides, volcanic eruptions, or man-made explosions.
Earthquake
Earthquakes are caused by the sudden release of slowly accumulated strain energy along a fault in the earth's crust.
Cyclone
Cyclones cannot be irradiated from the western coast of India. There is excessive length of coastline across the western
coast of India and moreover the topographical features of the Indian coast and existent of Ghats in the southern part.
This could get in a cyclone from low to Very heavy strength.
7.3.5 Stages of an Emergency Plan
The plan consists of the actual performance of duties & responsibilities by designated personnel and other agencies.
Therefore, the plan is divided into three stages.
The stage one is pre-emergency period preparedness, awareness and training parts during normal activities and prior
to emergency.
While stage second explains actions during emergency period i.e. during actual emergency period, specific duties and
responding actions are to be performed by designated person by using available resources to control the emergency by
various persons in systematic ways within shortest period.
The third stage indicates post-emergency period which describes rehabilitation and normalcy after the emergency and
to preserve evidences and records for remedial measures, and to face inquiry as required by various authorities. It also
explains corrective steps learnt from the incident and investigation of reasons behind the emergency to prevent re-
occurrence of such type emergency.
Basic Structure
There are four basic structures or stages to be considered for emergency planning, as described earlier, which are
reproduced as Figure 7-24.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 195
Figure 7-24: Stages of an Emergency Plan
Pre-Emergency
This is the first stage of the plan. Planning is the most important factor of the plan, which will reflect during actual
performance. The subjects cover mostly on preparatory action, awareness, preventive & maintenance measures,
preparedness, resource development, training, and rehearsal etc.
1. Disaster Management
The effective control and command during the emergency, the structure of organization should be developed precisely
and very clearly. This includes the organizational aspect of the plan; clearly stating the line of command, each person’s
specific responsibilities, and organizational set up available to tackle the Emergency effectively. There will be single line
of control.
2. Emergency Resources
It is the part of preparedness and awareness created during the first stage. The plan is prepared to meet the various
types of the emergencies. The type of equipment, appliances and neutralizing can be ascertained from properties of
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 196
chemicals being stored/ handled at unit. It should be ensured that the sufficient inventories should be maintained and
kept in order
Action Plan
It prescribes the role & responsibility of designated persons. The action plan describes the different actions and
performance by the various emergency services, persons and agencies during emergency. This part gives guidelines to
prevent, control and mitigate the emergency by various agencies / persons in the specific way. It describes the actual
response procedure to be followed by different categories of persons / services for different types of the emergencies.
No duplication of work or duties.
1. During Emergency
The real actions by using available resources at the earliest and performance of work in prescribed way must be carried
out by emergency services, trained persons and different agencies. The control room will be activated. There will be
declaration regarding the type of emergency. The designated persons will direct and handle the situation to control
emergency.
2. Post-Emergency
After controlling the emergency, pending actions and other incidental works are to be carried out in prescribed manner.
The process or work after emergency is called as Post-Emergency, which includes,
Safe termination of emergency
Resumption of normalcy & Rehabilitation
Essential & authentic information
Investigation and preparation of report
Corrective action
Risk Assessment on the Incident to introduce more control measures
7.3.6 Emergency Alert Codes
For the purpose of determining the level of emergency response support required the following three emergency alert
codes are used for the notification of emergencies:
Alert I Emergency
Any incident which is considered to be minor in nature and has no potential risk of threatening lives or facilities in the
plant and it is within the capability of the ERT to conduct initial containment for spills, suppression of fires, or rescue
operations for personnel shall be classified as Alert I emergency. Typical examples are:
Minor fires involving plant equipment which can be extinguished easily
Minor gas or toxic releases which can be isolated easily within a short period of time
Minor building fires or fires involving non-process/plant equipment
Minor hazardous material spills or releases from road tankers or storage tanks which can be contained by dike or
absorbent materials or recovered by vacuum cleaner.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 197
Alert II Emergency
Any incident which is considered to be serious in nature and, though it is still within the capability of the ERT to handle,
has a potential risk of threatening other facilities or buildings on site or off-site shall be classified as Alert II emergency.
Typical examples are:
Fires involving flammable storage tanks or plant equipment
Gas or toxic releases of relatively large quantity but can be isolated safely
Spillage of flammable or hazardous substances which requires substantial resources for cleaning up or recovery.
Alert III Emergency
Any incident considered being beyond the capability of the ERT to handle and it requires the assistance from external
emergency agencies such as Fire Services shall be classified as Alert III emergency. Typical examples of Alert III
emergency are:
Major and prolonged fires involving the plants or storage tanks.
Major and prolonged gas or toxic releases due to catastrophic failure of process equipment or storage tanks which
warrant a site-wide evacuation
Major hazardous materials spills due to catastrophic failure of process equipment, storage tanks or road tankers
7.3.7 Roles and Responsibilities during Emergency
In order to achieve above objectives the role of key personnel is clearly defined to avoid confusion and to meet the
emergency effectively. The Shift In charge and the Incident Controller are the personnel for effective control of an
emergency. As per the emergency preparedness chart the success of control of an emergency situation depends upon
their timely action. The action for these persons and Emergency Do’s and Don’ts are given in this section.
Key Person and their Responsibilities
Person Noticing Emergency
Keep himself safe
He will inform Shift In-charge / other colleagues
Break MCP at the nearest location or use PA system to inform Shift Incharge
Try and mitigate the situation by not endangering himself and if with required personal protection. As far as
possible SIC / colleagues should be called even if he thinks that it is possible to deal with the situation by himself.
On hearing the emergency siren, the plant emergency key personnel shall carry out the functions as defined in
Flowchart for Emergency Handling
Site Main Controller
Assisted by Incident Controller and other services coordinators.
Overall emergency coordination.
Review and approve tactical plan.
Communicate with incident coordinator and mobilize supporting groups.
Call out and mobilize key personnel
Direct plant emergency actions (e.g. Plant /equipment isolation plant shutdown, etc.)
Monitor personnel accounting status and activate rescue operations through incident coordinator if necessary.
Assess on/off-site impact and alert neighbouring companies if necessary.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 198
Decide on plant-wide evacuation if needed.
Continuous review and assess possible developments.
Control rehabilitation of affected areas and victims on cessation of emergency.
Announce “All Clear” message.
Site recovery and post incident critique
Incident Controller
Rush to the site and size up emergency situation and decide response strategy and tactical plan.
Deputing Deputy Incident Controller on emergency site.
Coordinating with Deputy Incident Controller.
Organize emergency response team.
Size up control zones.
Set up field incident post.
Command and direct emergency response actions.
Deploy emergency equipment.
Direct rescue operations upon getting instruction from site main controller.
Communicate with site main controller & update on incident status.
Monitor safety of operations & decide to stop unsafe operations.
Monitor personnel fatigue and stress.
Ensure decontamination is established.
Ensure that outside emergency services including mutual aid have been called in.
Coordinate with external agencies after their arrival in case of emergency.
Inform the emergency team leaders about the situation.
Deputy Incident Controller
Direct all operations within the affected area with the priority of,
Secure the safety of personnel
Minimize the damage to plant, property and environment
Minimize the loss of material
Decide whether on-site emergency action plan is to be initiated depending upon the process control and severity of
the incident.
Direct rescue, spill control, fire fighting team leaders.
Monitor the incident as a whole.
Ensure that emergency control centre / security supervisor and complementary communicating officer are
informed.
Evacuate non-essential persons to assembly point.
Appraise ECC about the developments of emergency control continuously by personal approach or messenger or
telephone.
Search for the causalities using PPE.
Appraise the situation to a senior office whoever reaches first at site.
Preserve evidences that will be necessary for subsequent inquiry into the cause of emergency and concluding
preventive measures.
Remark:
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 199
Plants are running in three shifts and shift in charges is available round the clock in each shift. As Shift in charge is
having thorough knowledge of the plant and has capability to take decisions both for process and incident control, he
will be Dy. Incident controller in absence of H.O.D.
Duties of NDO
Assisted by Incident Controller and other services coordinator.
Overall emergency coordination in absence of site main controller SMC.
Communication with SMC regarding emergency.
HSE Staff
Take instructions from the site main controller
Liaison with hospital to handle emergency cases related to injury and illness
Assist the site main controller to alert and coordinate with external emergency organizations.
Assist the site main controller to make announcement.
Call out key personnel.
Assist in handling incoming phone calls, quires from external agencies and employee family.
Ensure communication aids are provided for effective communication at ECC.
Evaluate the spill.
Mobilize all necessary and suitable spill control equipment.
Take instruction from the site main controller.
Assign spill control responders.
Provide direction for spill control responders.
Suitably rotate spill control responders to avoid fatigue.
Monitor and maintain essential supplies to the incident site.
Perform spill control activates.
Coordinate with first aid / fire fighting team if required.
Check the conditions of the PPE provided for spill control.
Inform about the situation to incident coordinator.
Suitably dispose all contaminated items after spill control.
Medical Care/ First Aid Coordinator (Medical Centre)
After hearing the siren two people will bring stretcher & medical oxygen kit to incident place.
Arrange for additional oxygen sets / cylinders required from neighbouring factories.
Get ready with the list of blood group donors and arrange to send the donors if required.
It shell be ensure that telephone traffic is controlled.
Arrange for refreshment / food for the personnel engaged in the emergency action.
Get the relevant data of the victims and inform their relatives.
Inform nearly by Hospital / medical institutions about the required help.
Provide support for first aid and rescue operations.
Update the site main controller on the first aid operations.
Monitor and assist the incident first aid canter and the medical canter.
Assembly Point In Charge
Shall evacuate the area and report to a specified assembly point
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 200
Assembly point in-charge will be any of key personal or in his absent available senior most personal takes this
responsibility.
At reaching the designated assembly points after considering the wind direction, the workers and the staff must be
instructed to queue according to the plant and the department they belong to.
Each section senior person must then count the heads and match with their daily attendance record to see if
anyone is left missing in the plant.
If so then the fire and rescue personnel must be informed accordingly with is most probable place of being.
Key Personnel
On receipt of emergency message / siren departmental in-charge shall arrange to spare and ensure to send
personnel trained in Fire Fighting, First Aid and Rescue for emergency activity at incident place.
Departmental in-charge arranges to vacate the shop floor or work place keeping necessary employees to operate
continuous process and evacuated personal should assemble at the assembly point.
The individual concern shall leave the work place as safe as possible like switching of welding machines, gas
cylinders, electrical light or appliances in their room.
Proactively takes charge of various activities (Fire & Safety, gas spill control, communication, medical services,
transport, engineering and technical help, utilities and outside help) being carried out at the time of emergency.
Coordinate and ensure the activities related to perform show (at incident control, assembly point, emergency
control, communication, security main gate) appropriately.
Direct and help securities to handle crowed / mass with proper discipline.
Non- Emergency Personnel
Do not get panic. Act accordingly to the prevailing situation.
Check the wind direction and decide the escape route if it is required to do so.
Do not approach the scene of accident as a spectator.
Do not engage phone unnecessarily somebody may be trying to pass on some information.
Non operations employee shall approach assembly points after receiving instructions.
Visitors shall move out of the factory on hearing the siren
Security Staff
Keep main gate closed till all clear siren and normalcy is restored.
Do not allow any vehicle or tanker inside the factory, except essential vehicles such as fire tenders/ foam tender,
ambulance, Govt. Agencies, Statutory Authorities, Mutual aid staff, etc.
In case of toxic gas release send two watch guards to alert the neighboring factories depending upon wind
direction.
Check about public in vicinity and ask them to evacuate on upwind at a safe place.
Help fire squad team to evacuate non-essential personnel and non-technical staff.
Depute security guards to control traffic on the internal road.
Depute security guards to help firefighting, if necessary.
Lead the external helping teams to reach the accident site.
Do not engage phone unnecessarily somebody may be trying to pass on some information.
Control the crowd.
Cordon off the affected site
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 201
Essential Staff
Fire Fighting, gas leak and spill control till fire brigade takes the charge.
To help the fire brigade and mutual aid teams, if it is so required.
Shutting down plant and making it safe.
Emergency engineering work e.g. isolating equipment, materials, process, providing temporary by-pass lines, safe
transfer of material, urgent repairing or replacement, electrical work etc.
Provision of emergency power, water, lighting, instruments, equipment, material etc.
Movement of equipment, special vehicle and transport to or from the scene of the incident.
First aid and medical help.
Moving tankers or other vehicles from areas of risk.
Carrying out atmospheric test and pollution control.
Manning of assembly points to record the arrival or evacuated personnel.
Manning for outside shelters and welfare of evacuated person there.
To look after the rehabilitation of affected persons after withdrawal of emergency at the site.
Assistance at casualties’ reception areas to record details of casualties’.
Assistance at communication centers to handle outgoing and incoming calls and to act as messengers if necessary.
Manning of works entrances in liaison with the police to direct emergency vehicles entering the work, to control
traffic leaving the works and to turn away or make alternative safe arrangements for visitors, contractors and other
traffic arriving at the works.
Informing surrounding factories and the public as directed by the site main controller
Procedure for emergency call out of key personnel (After office hours)
The shift in charge shall call the respective incident coordinator and provide the following information and record the
same and incident coordinator shall call to site main controller.
What happened ( e.g. fire, spillage, explosion, etc)
Time and location of incident
Alert level
On receiving the information from the fire alarm, Trained Security personnel shall rush to the incident location to help
the shift in-charge in handling the emergency.
If the Unit Head is not available, the Shift In charge will call the respective Incident coordinator at his home phone
number.
Upon receipt of such emergency calls, the key personnel shall call out their respective team members who need to
render assistance in the emergency in the same manner.
The Site Main Controller, Safety Officer and Incident Coordinator shall depart immediately to the site depending on the
alert level of emergency.
Important Note
Till the Site Main Controller or his designate reach the site during and after office hours Emergency, the respective HOD
shall act as a Site Main Controller and take decisions regarding the external agency call-out and on handling the
emergency.
If the key personnel, especially the Functional heads are outstation or out of the country where they can’t be reached
by mobile phone they shall delegate their responsibility to their resources or members.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 202
Recognition of Problem
The first action in case of a chemical spill and critical to subsequent actions, is early, accurate identification of what
is being spilled, the extent of the spillage, the expected duration and potential for the incident to worsen. This can
sometimes be determined quickly. Other incidents may require some investigation time. Activate alarm through
phone call to security to alert the emergency response team.
A quick “size-up” is required if effective notification, and possible evacuation of employees or contractor are
needed. Attempt to stop leak only if personal safety is not endangered stop all work in the vicinity and ensure no
source of ignition. Evacuate all workers to up-wind location.
If in your best judgment, based on the initial known factors, there is potential to cause harm to anybody, you
should alert them as quickly as possible. To delay this action greatly increases the level of possible harmful results.
Generally, if you feel the leak can be controlled in a short time (30 minutes or less) you should advise them of the
situation. If you feel the leakage will continue for longer than that and the spilled material is very toxic or highly
corrosive you should advise immediate but orderly evacuation
Safety of Personnel
The first concern in the event of any spillage must always be the safety of people, both employees and our
contractors.
All must be counted for as quickly as possible. If anybody is missing, organize search and rescue operation with the
instruction of the emergency incident controller.
Personnel who are not needed to cope with the problem should be removed from the emergency area to an area
of safety as quickly as possible.
Persons remaining in the spill area must wear the appropriate level of personal protective equipment (PPE) to
protect them from exposure to the chemical involved before attempting any emergency action.
This PPE would include either a self-contained berating apparatus (SCBA) or an airline respirator with an
emergency egress unit. Body protection would depend on the chemical involved with reference to the MSDS.
Traffic control and barricade off accessible roads.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 203
Communication Aid and Emergency Siren
Details of alarms and sirens are given in Table 7-24.
Table 7-24: Details of Alarms & Siren
SI
Plant wise alarm points Alarm
Signal
is heard
up to
Sound difference, if any
Plant /
Dept./
Location
S. No.
of
Alarm
Point
Location
of Alarm
Type of the Alarm / Siren
Period of
checking In Case of
emergency All Clear Testing
Type of
Emergency
Types of
Alarm
Type of
Sound
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 CCR CCR
(01)
On Terrace
On Terrace
30 Sec ON, 15
Sec Off, For 3
min.
Continuous 2
min.
Continues 1
min.
Weekly
(Every
Monday)
400mtr
Radius
Fire, Explosion,
Toxic & Gas
Release
Electrical Wailing &
Continues 2
Fire &
Safety
Building
F&S
(02)
3 Power Plant PPCR
(03)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 204
7.3.8 Standard Procedures for Evacuation
A plant emergency may require various evacuation steps by employees. Depending on the seriousness of the
emergency or by specific instruction, employees must be prepared to evacuate:
Various kinds of emergencies that can warrant limited or total plant area evacuation are:
Severe Fire
Severe toxic-flammable gas release
Threatening calls, civil unrest or curfew
Earthquake, flood, storm
The Site Main Controller / Coordinator shall use his judgment and discretion to decide; as far as reasonable
practicable consult with the Management Leaderships, to effect a partial or total evacuation of personnel from the
site.
Some spillage could be serious enough to either evacuate the affected area and possibly site or have them take
shelter in safe places until the spillage passes.
Evacuation of employees and contractors should be initiated by fire alarm and then advising appropriately,
specific evacuation information and instruction. Evacuation routine shall be cross-wind and up-wind relative to
the gas cloud.
Evacuation Classification
Stage I
On hearing the siren, respective area team will make quick check for any abnormality and verify the affected
zone.
On verification shift in-charge / incident coordinator shall decide further course of action. If the fire is small and
in alert level 1, then the shift in charge / incident coordinator will engage the fire fighting team to put off fire
and need not evacuate all the people.
Stage II
On hearing the siren, respective area shift in-charge/ incident coordinator shall verify the affected area. If the
fire stage is evaluated as Alert II, then the shift in-charge / incident coordinator shall retain fire fighting team
and first aid team at incident location and evacuate rest of the people to the assembly point.
Stage III
On hearing the siren, respective area shift in-charge / incident coordinator shall verify the affected area. If the
fire stage is evaluated as Alert III level, then the shift in charge / incident coordinator shall take instruction
from Site Main Controller to do further fire fighting or to evacuate the incident location.
Plant evacuation will take time to execute. If there is adequate warning time, normal shutdown procedures will
be used as outlined in the operations manual.
Orderly evacuation steps may then take place. When time is limited, crash type shutdown procedure will be
used.
Information to evacuate will be passed down through supervision to all personnel in the plant.
Assembly Points and Evacuation Routes
There are total 4 Assembly points as below mention locations.
Assembly Point No. Location
A-1 North side of Central Warehouse
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 205
Assembly Point No. Location
A-2 West side of Cooling Tower
A-3 South-West Side of Control Room Boiler
A-4 North side of Effluent Treatment Plant ( ETP)
These are the locations where all personnel on site will assemble in case of an emergency and the head count
will be conducted by the security supervisor at the main gate.
In normal situation, evacuation route for stage III, evacuation is by the main gate.
In a critical situation, evacuation may be carried out via the existing route as plan. Assistance from external
emergency agencies shall be sought to mobilize resources for evacuation.
The Incident Coordinator and the Designated Rescuers
Respond to the scene of the release or incident and communicate with the operation team of the affected area.
Determine the needs of the area, which could include searching, rescue and transporting of victims to area
where medical assistance is available.
Determine extent of release.
Develop a plan of action with the site main controller and review plan with operation Heads.
1. Determine scope of search
Decide whether search is needed
Decide on size of area to search (downwind)
Do not search unoccupied or locked buildings unless someone is believed to be inside
2. Consider resources available
Extra manpower available
Vehicles available for transportation
Extra safety equipment available
3. Determine use of manpower and protective gear worn
Minimum of two persons per team
Donned proper protective gear
Ambulance and First Aider on Standby
4. Execute Plan – revise plan as needed
7.3.9 Emergency Control Centre
The Emergency Control Centre (or Room) is the place from which the operations to handle the emergency and
directed and coordinated. It will be attended by the site main controller, key personnel and senior officer of the
Fire, Police, Dy. Director – Industrial Safety and Health, District Authorities and Emergency Services. The Centre
should be equipped to receive and transmit information and directions from and to the incident controller and areas
of the works as well as outside. It should also have Equipment for logging the development of the incident to assist
the controllers to determine any necessary action.
In addition to the means of communication, the centre should be equipped with relevant data and equipment which
will assist those manning the centre to be conversant with the developing situation and enable them to plan
accordingly.
It should be sited in an area of minimum risk and close to a road to allow for ready access by a radio-equipped
vehicle for use if other systems fail or extra communication facilities are needed.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 206
For large sites, or where toxic releases might be anticipated, consideration should be given to setting up 2 control
centres to ensure, so far as is possible, that one will be available for use, should the other be disabled. If necessary
the police will assist to set up an Emergency Control Centre remote from the works.
The Centre should therefore contain:
1. An adequate number of external telephones. It is strongly recommended that at least one should be ex-
directory or capable of use for outgoing calls only. This will avoid the telephone switchboard being overloaded
with calls from anxious relatives, the press etc. the latest telephone directories with a separate list of important
numbers.
2. An adequate number of internal telephones.
3. Radio equipment, hot lines, walky-talky etc.
4. Plans of the factory to show:
Areas of large inventories of hazardous materials including tanks, reactor drums and compressed gas
cylinders.
Location of radioactive sources.
Sources of sirens and safety equipment including fire, explosion, spill and gas controls.
Stock of other fire extinguishing materials.
The fire-water system and additional sources of water.
Site entrances and road system, updated at the time of the emergency to indicate any road that is
impassable.
Assembly points, shelters, lunch room and canteen.
Casualty treatment centres, first aid centres and ambulance.
Parking points, rail sidings and visitors room.
Location of the factory in relation to the surrounding community.
Site main controller will operate from ECC; details regarding ECC are given as below:
S. No. Materials kept in the ECC Quantity Person who’ll handle /operate
1 External Telephones 2 Nos. Head HSE
2 Internal Telephones 2 Nos. Head HR & Admin
3 Telephone Directory – Internal &
External 1 No. Head HR & Admin
4 Wireless 2 Nos. Head HSE
5 Map of the Site 1 No. Head Engineering
6 Factory Layout 1 No. Head Engineering
7 Layout of Fire Hydrant &
Extinguishers 1 No. Head HSE
8 Layout of Emergency Control Center
& Assembly Point 1 No. Head HSE
9 Stock sheet of Fire Extinguisher
material and its availability 1 No. Head HSE
10 Muster role of employees 1 No. Head HR & Admin
11 Work Permit Book 1 No. Head O&M
12 Gate Passes book 1 No. Head HR & Admin
13 List of employee blood group 1 No. Head HR & Admin
14 Stationery (i.e., Note Pads, Pens,
Pencils, Rubbers, etc.) Adequate Head HR & Admin
15 Copy of On-site emergency Plan 1 No. Head HSE
16 Copy of Off-site emergency Plant 1 No. Head HSE
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 207
S. No. Materials kept in the ECC Quantity Person who’ll handle /operate
17 Torches 3 Nos. Head HR & Admin
18 Umbrella 5 Nos. Head HR & Admin
19 Raincoat 10 Pairs Head HR & Admin
20 Safety Shoes 5 Pairs Head HR & Admin
21 Helmets 10 Nos. Head HR & Admin
22 Goggles 10 Nos. Head HR & Admin
23 Ear Muffs 10 Pairs Head HR & Admin
24 Aprons 5 Nos. Head HR & Admin
25 Digital Camera with Memory Card 1 No. Head HR & Admin
26 Stop Watch 1 No. Head HR & Admin
27 Self-Breathing Apparatus 2 Nos. Head HSE
7.3.10 About medical arrangements
Occupational Health Centre (OHC) with all the required facilities with 1 nos. of Ambulances is available, which runs
round the clock. Qualified Medical Officer and 4 Male nurses are available at OHC.
Following equipment are available at OHC:
Central Oxygen Line
Separate Oxygen Cylinders
ECG Machine
PFT Machine
Audiometry Machine
Vision Test
Suction Machine
7.3.11 Accounting for Personnel / Head count
It is necessary to know that everyone on site has been accounted for and that the relatives of casualties if any
have been appropriately informed. Holidays and sickness absence will have to be taken into account and
adequate personnel for relief are made available including replacement for some others who may be at off site
at time engaged on other work.
Records of the employee (normal roll) present on a particular day or shift can be known from timekeeper
office. Officers’ presence can be known in departments.
Shift schedules are also maintained in the department and in time office for each person.
Shift change time will create confusion. In such case to record will help depending on outgoing or incoming
punches.
Records of arrival and departure of all visitors is maintained by the security department together will the names
of persons/ officers of the company to whom they have come to meet. Etc.
In charge of assembly point will record the names & department of people reporting at assembly point.
A responsible person will collect the list to compare them against the normal roll or list of those believed to be
on-site inform the police of any believed to the missing. IC will be informed and arrangement will be made for
further search.
Visitors should be accompanied by responsible member of the works staff. Designated to perform emergency
duty. Display proper board for storage area.
In the immediately affected area incident controller etc. will arrange for a search to locate any injured persons
or causalities.
Other workers / colleagues also will give information regarding the same.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 208
Head count at the respective assembly point shall be tallied by head count coordinator and communicate to
communicator wait for further instruction from the emergency response incident commander or communicator.
Any person who is not accounted for will be located by the officer ( HR & Safety) on instruction from
communicator and the rescue team will carry out search and rescue operations to locate the missing person or
persons upon the instruction of the incident commander.
Public Relations
Inevitably a major incident will attract the attention of the press, television and radio services and anxious
inquiries from friend and relatives will be flooding the factory.
It is essential to make arrangements for authoritative release of information to them.
Declaration of cessation of emergency
The security officer or guard will not signal the end of the emergency until that all the spillage / leakage are
arrested or fires are extinguished and there is no risk of re-ignition in case of fire, in case of gas; the all clear
will be declared only when the source of emission has been effectively isolated and gas cloud dispersed well
above safe level.
Even when the all clear signal has been given, great care is needed while entering in affected areas and no
work in connection with salvage, collection of evidence should be commenced until a thorough examination of
the area has been carried out.
The siren code will follow for declaring the cessation of an emergency. Source of leakage, spillage or re-
ignition such as diesel engine, and / or power operated tools, flame cutting equipment and so on until it has
been established that no flammable materials remain where they could be ignited. All clear shall be given by
site main controller.
Traffic Controller
The security incharges or guard shall contact site incharge and shall make himself available at main gate for
traffic control. Till local authorities help is available. In case of diverting the traffic of nearby roads or stoppage,
security guard shall coordinate site incharge with outside agencies as police ADM etc. Unwanted traffic and
public gathering shall be controlled and avoided by security personnel till local help from police is available.
7.3.12 About Fire System
The plant is equipped with a comprehensive fire protection system, following facilities have been provided for
the fire protection.
To meet and control the emergency and to minimize the dangerous consequences, ready to use tools and
equipment are essential. A list of fire fighting equipment is prepared and their location is indicated in the list.
All buildings and process areas are provided with hand-held fire extinguishers. Depending on the type of
hazards, Foam Type, CO2 or Dry Chemical are installed and spaced in accordance with the regulatory
requirements
Details of Fire Fighting & Life Saving Equipment
Table 7-25: Fire Water Storage & Pumping Capacity
Fire Pumps Fire Water
Type of Pump Nos. Type of Storage
Engine Driven ( 780 m3/Hr) 3 Water Reservoir
Motor Driven ( 780 m3/Hr) 3 Water Reservoir
Jockey Pump ( 160 m3/Hr) 2 Water Reservoir
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 209
Table 7-26: Fire Alarm Systems
Sr. No. Detectors Nos.
1 Beam Detector 8
2 Smoke Detector 266
3 Heat Detector 6
4 MCP 87
5 Hooter 25
Table 7-27: GAS Detection System
Sr. No. Detectors Nos. Detection Range Minimum Detection Limit
1 HC Detector 102 0-100 % 1%
2 Benzene Detector 8 0-100 ppmv 1 ppmv
3 H2 Detector 4 0 -100 % 3 %
Table 7-28: Fire Extinguisher
Sr. No. Item Description Nos.
1 Fire Bucket 4
2 Fire Extinguisher – DCP – 6 Kg 145
3 Fire Extinguisher – DCP – 9 Kg 252
4 Fire Extinguisher – DCP – 50 Kg, Trolley Type 41
5 Fire Extinguisher – CO2 – 4.5 Kg 15
6 Fire Extinguisher – CO2 – 6.8 Kg 39
7 Fire Extinguisher – CO2 – 22.5 Kg, Trolley Type 7
Table 7-29: Auxiliary Equipment in Fire Station
Sr. No. Item Description Nos.
1 Breathing Apparatus Set (45 minutes/300bar with 15 space cylinder) 6
2 Breathing Apparatus set compressor with air quality monitoring kit 1
3 Fire Proximity Suit 2
4 Fire Entry Suit 2
5 Multi Gas Monitor 2
6 Area Gas Monitor 2
7 Fire Siren with Controller 1
8 Hand Operated Siren 1
9 Hand Held PA System 1
Fire Suppression and Control
Most site employees receive training on basic fire fighting. Any employee is capable of extinguish a small fire.
Larger fires will require coordinated effort cantered around the specially trained emergency response team on each
shift. Due to our remote location from outside assistance, our response plan is premised on handling our own fire
fighting.
Immediate action for quick fire fighting
Think! Can I extinguish the fire? Do I need help?
If fire is in incipient stage, use hand held fire extinguisher, hose reel or fire monitor to extinguish fire.
If Fire is too large – get Help! Activate fire alarm and report the location of the fire. If you know, give wind
direction.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 210
Stop all work in the area. Secure all ignition sources in the area.
Emergency Response Team report to staging area upwind of incident and don PPE and receive instruction from
incident coordinator.
Account for all personnel.
Site Main Controller / Emergency Incident coordinator and emergency response team determine course of
action.
Uninvolved employees report to one of the assembly points. Do not enter the site of the emergency unless you
have a specific emergency assignment there.
7.3.13 Action at Site in case of Emergency
Site Main Controller
The site main controller will have the responsibility for directing the emergency until the emergency is brought
under control. He will be responsible for manning the command post and coordinating all site activities which could
impact upon the control of the emergency. He will work with the incident coordinator to develop a plan of action
and will direct him in whatever duties are required. He will be responsible for directing the emergency response
team in all fire fighting in the field. He must also be kept advised on all operations at the unit that might affect fire
control or endanger personnel.
Incident Controller
The Incident coordinator will take charge of the incident site and instruct Fire team & First aid Team and maintain 2
way communications with Emergency Control Centres and report to the site main controller.
List of Rescue / Safety Equipment (Respiratory & Non- Respiratory PPE)
Safety Helmet
Safety Goggles
Safety Hand Gloves
Face Shield & Gum Boots
SCBA (Self – Contained Breathing Apparatus)
Respirators
Safety Shoes
Full Body safety Harness with double lanyard and shock absorber
System elements or Events
Control of Spillage
Efforts must be undertaken where safely possible to minimize the effect of the spillage until it can be secured.
If the spill is creating a vapour cloud and the material is water soluble, a water fog curtain can dramatically
reduce the concentration of escaping vapour.
Even water reactive materials can be handled this way in some cases by keeping the water fog curtain away
from direct contact with the spill area.
If the spill is liquid, run-off of the spill and/or any applied water can be confined by closing isolation valves in
the drainage systems.
Once the spillage is controlled and the emergency is over, clean up and recovery can then be handled by
vacuum cleaners, excavations, adsorbent, drumming, etc.
Spills of volatile liquid materials may be successfully controlled by the application of stabilized foam.
The gelled foam blanket will effectively suppress vapour release from many spills for periods of several hours to
several days. The gel can be penetrated and a suction hose used to remove the liquid beneath it.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 211
In some cases of airborne dust, a properly applied water fog curtain downwind can also provide an effective
barrier.
In all cases, any action that can be safely attempted by properly protected personnel to reduce or terminate
the chemical release will be carried out.
As in all emergencies communication, clearly understood responsibilities and roles, and an action plan are all
critical to a safe, effective response.
Clean – Up
Following any accidental release, all spilled materials will be recovered and disposed of safely in accordance
with established regulatory permits, standards and proper practices.
All contaminated items will be either thoroughly decontaminated or properly disposed off by incineration.
Contaminated clothing should also be incinerated.
Spill Emergency Reporting
Location
Name of Material (spilled)
Equipment from which the spillage occurred
Rate and size of spill./spill control media
Emergency actions in case of spillage
Access the situation and blow siren depending upon the situation
Stop operation if required.
Stop hot job in surrounding area; suspend operations which are likely to create sparks.
Check wind direction and approach from upward direction
Inform effluent treatment plant about the possibility of hydrocarbons coming into the effluent plant.
Be prepared for fire- fighting if required start evacuation
Cool down surrounding equipment /vessel with water
Vapours travelling in downwind directions should be knocked down with the fire water spray.
Cordon off the area if required
Evacuate non-essential persons from the surrounding depending upon the emergency.
In case of liquid pool advise fire personnel to cover it with foam.
Control of toxic release:
A slow or intermittent release of toxic may affect the people who are at outside the site.
A major event leading to a sudden release of a large quantity of a toxic substance, which would form a large
toxic cloud e.g. release to atmosphere of most of the contents of a storage vessel through the failure of a tank
shell, man hole cover etc.
Although the probability of occurring of such event is extremely low, the consequence would be severe for the
people living close to the incident and in the path of cloud.
The role of emergency service would be rescue, treatment of the injured, making safe the affected area etc.
7.3.14 Antidotes
DPL has agreement with nearby hospital and all antidotes will be made available at hospital. Details of antidotes are
given as below;
Table 7-30: Details of Antidotes
Chemicals Antidotes
Benzene, Xylene & Toluene Diazem – 1 mg/kg. (Intravenous), Epenephia, Ephedrine
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 212
Chemicals Antidotes
Phenol and derivatives
Take the patient in clean air,
activated charcoal and 240ml milk,
if the eye or skin affected than wash with plenty of water,
clean the skin with poly ethylene glycol (PEG)
Hydrochloric Acid Drink Large quality of water,
Milk of Magnesia
Sulphuric Acid 98%
Milk of Magnesia,
4% Sodium Hydro Carbonate Solution, milk
Phenol Diphoterine
7.3.15 Emergency Do’s and Don’ts
Do’s Don’ts
For Safer Operation
Store used oil at proper place as per plant guidelines.
Use lubricating oil carefully to avoid spillage on ground.
Use lubricating oil as per requirement.
Use minimum amount of water wherever it is required
as per plant guidelines.
Waste disposal system for all plants should be separate.
Avoid spillage of coal, liquid, hand gloves, cotton waste
on road, which will cause pollution. Recycle or dispose
that material.
Use cleaning equipment carefully. (i.e. cotton waste, oil
& chemicals)
Place all the equipments (i.e. Fire Hose, Rubber Pipe
and Chisel) at proper place.
Handling of chemicals should be as per plant guidelines
to avoid undesired chemical reaction.
Safety training and correct use of PPE’s must for all the
employees.
Environment guidelines should follow during cleaning of
vessels, Tank, channels etc.
Follow shift in charge’s instructions during loading or
unloading of chemicals.
In case of fire or any accident, immediately inform
responsible person,
In case of emergency, inform operator as well as control
room.
Area of work during excavation, radiography, sand
blasting shall be cordoned with warning tags of "work in
progress”, “no entry”, “radiography” in progress' etc.
Switch off lights and computers when not in use.
Shut the water cock properly when not in use.
Always follow safety rule during the plant operation.
Do not use fire hydrant water for washing/bath purpose.
Do not use water for cleaning purpose, use broomstick if
possible.
Do not wash or clean trolley, tractor or trucks which are
used for chemical/fertilizer’s transportation. Wash them
at proper place.
Smoking & carrying matchbox, cigarettes, lighter, bidis
etc. are prohibited.
Photography & carrying cameras/Mobile phones are
strictly prohibited in all areas.
Do not spill liquid or chemicals in open atmosphere.
The use of Radio Active Source within the plant shall not
be allowed without obtaining valid permission/work
permit and intimation in the form of a circular to all plant
persons shall be given in advance.
Unauthorized entry into any battery limit of plant is
strictly prohibited.
Sitting or walking on rail tracks, crossing between
wagons, taking rest under stabled wagons, crossing the
rail through the openings underneath the stationary
wagons are strictly prohibited.
During Shutdown
All equipment, vessels, lines where hot work is
envisaged shall be purged, flushed thoroughly and
positively isolated. Similar precautions should be taken
for vessel entry also.
Back flow of materials from sewers, drains should be
avoided by proper isolations.
Do not use gasket or other blinds as it can fail during
job. All blinds should be metallic.
No toxic/corrosive/irritating materials should remain
plants or sections where hot work is to be carried out.
No hot work should be permitted in battery limits near
sewers till areas have been cleaned flushed properly.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 213
Do’s Don’ts
In case of confined space entry and other cleaning,
catalyst removal, sludge removal jobs etc. which are to
be carried out by the process department, vessel entry
permit should be issued to immediate supervising
officer/operator by shift in charge. This permit should be
renewed by incoming shift in charge during every shift.
Hoist, Platform, cages used for lifting persons or to send
persons inside vessels by such means must be of sound
construction with wire ropes slings, etc. to avoid failure.
All steam, condensate, hot water connections should be
made tight with clamps.
All underground sewers shall be flushed, protected from
sparks.
Full PPEs like PVC suits, gum boots, face shield & other
required shall be used while draining, flushing and other
reclaiming activities to avoid burn, poisoning etc.
Wet asbestos cloth/metallic plate should be used to
collect flying sparks.
Water, steam flushing, nitrogen blanketing shall be
continued where spontaneous combustion takes place.
Precautions should be taken for pyrophoric nature of
material.
Temporary electrical connections, cords, boards and
other electrical fixtures should be of sound material to
prevent electrical shock.
Oil spillage in the pit of oil slope tank should be cleaned
with water/sand.
Proper approach like aluminum ladder should be
provided to reach to the platforms of scaffolding and
ladder must be tied.
All clumps of scaffolding should be tightened properly
and planks should be tied at both ends and supported at
proper distances along span to avoid sagging and
failure.
Always use safety belt while working at height of more
than 2 meters and ensure tieing the life line of safety
belt with firm support.
Ensure area cordoning for hot work, X-ray, excavation,
hazard material temporary storage.
Ensure proper tagging of valves, switches etc to prevent
its use.
Ensure proper guidance to workman and make him
aware about local area hazards before start of the job.
All welding machines should be provided with power
isolation switch of suitable rating.
Portable electrical appliances/tools earthing should be in
good working condition. Insulation portion should be
free from damages.
All electrical cables should be joints free and connection
taken by using three pin plugs.
While inserting fuse all care should be taken so that no
one touches conductor to avoid the shock to the
persons.
No hot work irrespective of place of area shall be done
without valid permit.
No combustible material shall be there in flare line for
taking up of flare line job. Isolations shall be ensured.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 214
Do’s Don’ts
During hydro jetting work workers should wear hand
gloves, safety helmet goggles and PVC suit.
7.4 Occupational Health Surveillance
7.4.1 Purpose
Health assessment procedure is a particular method or technique for assessing health. Health assessment of ability
to do a job is the combination of procedures undertaken to ensure that the work does not endanger the health and
safety of the employee and that of others who may be affected by the actions of the employee. Health assessment
as a supplement to control of health risks in the working environment is undertaken in order to:
Measure the absorption of toxic substances or their metabolites in body tissues or fluids as a means of
evaluating exposure control;
Look for adverse health effects at an early stage;
Identify work related disease from clinical or personnel records;
Identify and protect those with an increased risk of developing adverse health effects, before they commence
any activity that could result in exposure.
7.4.2 Scope
The procedure is applicable to Deepak Phenolics Limited, Dahej Site.
7.4.3 Responsibility
Company Medical Officer shall ensure that the health assessment program is carried out as stated in the
procedure.
Departmental Heads shall responsible to ensure that the persons working under them shall be medically
examined regularly and they shall aware of hazards of chemicals and about occupational diseases.
7.4.4 Procedure
Pre-employment Health Assessment:
This shall be carried out for all categories of DPL employees and contractors workmen before employment to
ascertain physical fitness of the person for the purpose. Pre-employment Health Assessment shall be done by
qualified medical practitioner.
The objective of Pre-employment Medical Check-up is:
Ensure that the individual is fit-to-work and fulfill assigned duties at minimal risk to himself and to the assets
prior to recruitment and internal job transfer.
Advise on the significance to employment of past or existing medical conditions.
Ensure that individual disability does not present a risk to themselves or other persons.
Establish adequate baseline health data.
Comply with the requirements of Gujarat Factory Rules.
Periodic Health Assessment:
This shall be carried out
once in a period of six months for the persons employed in `hazardous process' in order to ascertain the health
status of workers in respect of occupational health hazards to which they are exposed.
Once in a year for those who are not exposed to `hazardous process'.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 215
Periodic Health Assessment shall be carried out by qualified medical practitioner.
The attendance of employees at the necessary routine health assessments is monitored and reported by
Company Medical Officer.
Examination on transfer:
When an existing worker is transferred to a job which requires specific standards then a further health assessment
shall be carried out.
Medical check-up after prolong sickness
Any employee resuming duty after prolonged illness (15 days) shall first report to Company Medical Officer with all
details for check-up and then report to his Manager.
Following Special Health Checks shall be carried out at DPL, Dahej Works (This shall be in addition to
routine tests):
Physical examination
Vision
Color vision
Audiometry
Chest X-ray
ECG
Pulmonary function test
CBC
ESR
Blood sugar
Creatinine
Uric acid
Blood urea nitrogen
SGOT, SGPT, serum bilirubin,
Serum cholesterol
Urine routine microscopic
TSH
Confidentiality of Information
Employees have rights on the confidentiality of the health records or any other clinical information that pertains to
him and it is ensured at all times. The disclosure, that too with the employee’s consent, shall be made only under
exceptional situations where:
The disclosure is a legal requirement;
In the opinion of the Company Medical Officer, such a disclosure is necessary for the protection and benefit of
the individual concerned or others.
7.4.5 Cross Reference
The details of pre-employment and periodical medical examinations carried out as aforesaid shall be recorded in the
Health Register in Form 7.
The medical records shall be preserved in the Occupational Health Centre in an individual files by Medical Officer.
A copy of up to date health and medical records shall be made available to worker on application in writing.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ADDITIONAL STUDIES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 216
7.5 Social Impact Assessment. R&R Action Plans
Not applicable as this is expansion of existing unit.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC PROJECT BENEFITS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 217
8 PROJECT BENEFITS
The proposed Cumene/Phenol project is located at Dahej, Gujarat INDIA. Technology and engineering services are
being provided by Kellogg, Brown & Root International Inc. (KBR), USA for Phenol and by UOP LLC, USA for
Cumene. The EPCM contractor is ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as UHDE,
India) for both Phenol and Cumene. This is being set up as per MOU with the Government of Gujarat
during Vibrant Gujarat Summit 2011.
The company has also decided to put up Cyclohexanone plant, Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK) plant, Isopropyl
Alcohol (IPA) plant and Acetophenone Plant at Dahej, Gujarat within the same plot. This is being submitted for
Vibrant Gujarat Summit 2017.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 218
9 ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Environmental cost benefit analysis has not been recommended at the scoping stage, and has therefore not been
carried out.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 219
10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)
10.1 Purpose
The Environment Management Plan (EMP) is prepared with a view to facilitate effective environmental management
of the project, in general and implementation of the mitigation measures in particular. The EMP provides a delivery
mechanism to address potential adverse impacts and to introduce standards of good practice to be adopted for all
project works. For each stage of the programme, the EMP lists all the requirements to ensure effective mitigation of
every potential biophysical and socio-economic impact identified in the EIA. For each impact or operation, which
could otherwise give rise to impact, the following information is presented:
Role of Croda and its contractors;
A comprehensive listing of the mitigation measures (actions) that DPL shall implement;
The parameters that shall be monitored to ensure effective implementation of the action;
The timing for implementation of the action to ensure that the objectives of mitigation are fully met
10.2 Air Quality
The environmental management plan for air quality is given as Table 10-1.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 220
Table 10-1: Environmental Management Plan for Air Quality
Objective To ensure that air emissions due to the site preparation, installation of proposed project and operation phase will be minimum
Concern Operation phase can deteriorate air quality
Benefit of EMP Reduced air pollution and protection of health of workers and local community
Impacting Activities
Mitigation Measures and
Rationale
Implementation and Management Remarks
Location Timing Responsibility Monitoring Records
Transportation of raw materials and
products
Ensure that vehicles have a Pollution
Under Control (PUC) Certificate
Along the vehicle
movement track
At all times during
operational phase
Safety department Checks by security staff at the entry
gate PUC Certificate -
Adequate safety measures along with
spill control mechanism
At site During
Transportation EHS Officer
Periodic monitoring by a party acceptable
to regulatory authority
Type of chemicals, operating condition of chemicals transported, Periodic Workplace air
quality monitoring
Record of leak detection
Proper personnel protective equipment to
be worn by workers at all times
Manufacturing process
Adequate safety measures, adequate
stack height for exhausted gases like VOC, Pigment dust will be controlled by
equipment like scrubbers, dust
collectors (Bag filters), etc.
At processing areas of the plant premises
At all times during
operational phase
EHS Officer
Periodic stack monitoring,
ambient air quality monitoring, work place monitoring
Stack, ambient air quality monitoring reports, work place monitoring report
PPEs to be provided to workers and will be used
by workers in process area; regular health
checkups of the employees/workers
Operation of Boiler and DG set (and
incinerator)
Adequate safety measures, adequate
stack height At site
At all time, during the production
process
Safety department Periodic stack
monitoring Ambient air monitoring
records of the stack -
10.3 Noise Environment
The environmental management plan for noise generated due to the proposed project is as presented in Table 10-2.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 221
Table 10-2: Environmental Management Plan for Noise Environment
Objective To reduce noise level due to the proposed expansion
Benefit of EMP Noise environment of the area will not be impacted by the proposed activity
Impacting Activity
Mitigation Measures
Implementation and Management
Remark Data Analysis
Measurement Methodology
Frequency Location
Reporting Schedule/
Responsibility
Emergency Procedure
Procurement Schedule
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C11 C12
Vehicular movement for
transportation of materials and
equipment
Vehicles trips during daytime only fixing route by avoiding populated area
Vehicle movement
records Manual Daily
At material
gate Security officer
Route for safe exit will be in
place.
During construction and operation phase
-
Start-up activities like operation of equipment for all
the proposed expansion
Acoustic enclosures will be used. Ear
plugs and Ear muffs will be provided to
workers
Noise Levels
SLM
Once during week (Hourly reading for 24 hours at each
location)
Inside plants
Plant in charge & Third
Party/Contractor
Regular Maintenance of equipment to
be done.
During operation phase
Ear plugs/Ear muffs to be
worn by workers at all
times.
Operation of other utilities like
Cooling Tower, Pumps, Blowers etc. & Equipment
maintenance
SOP’s will be followed. Acoustic enclosures will be
provided. Ear plugs and Ear muffs will
be provided to workers
Noise Levels
SLM
Once during week (Hourly reading for 24 hours at each
location)
All plants Plant in charge &
Third Party/Contractor
Periodic Maintenance of all equipment
will be scheduled
During operation phase
Proper personal protective
equipment to be worn by
workers at all times.
10.4 Surface Water & Solid Waste Management
Chapter 4 has identified impacts that are likely to arise. Where moderate impacts have been identified, the FAE has examined the extent to which these impacts would be
mitigated through the adoption of industry standard practice and guidelines and following legislative requirements of PCB. The Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
describes both generic good practice measures and site specific measures, the implementation of which is aimed at mitigating potential impacts associated with the proposed
activities.
Details of expected impact from various activities, and its management plan are given in Table 10-3.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 222
Table 10-3 Details of Activities responsible for Impact on Water Environment and Management Plan
Objective To reduce surface water pollution
Concern Pollution to surface water
Benefit of EMP Surface water quality will not be impacted by the proposed activity
Impacting Activities
Mitigation Measures and Rationale
Implementation and Management Remarks
Location Timing Responsibility Monitoring Records
Usage of Water
Water conservation practice shall be done by recycling of treated water through recycling RO in plant premises to reduce water demand as well as
to conserve natural resources.
Drip irrigation systems shall be proposed for
gardening.
Online flow meters shall be installed at each of raw water consumption
point.
Explore the condensate recovery from the boiler.
At site All time Site EHS
Manager / EHS Team
Monitoring of water
consumption at intake points
Records of Water consumption at each unit
to be carried out -
Wastewater generation,
treatment and disposal
Wastewater generated from the proposed project
shall be segregated at source and treated in ETP
followed by RO and treated water shall be
reuse in plant.
Online flow meters shall be installed at inlet and
outlet of the ETPs.
Use of PPE’s shall be mandatory while handling the chemicals in ETP to
avoid spillages.
ETP Sludge shall be disposed into approved
Landfill site and STP
At Site All time
Site EHS Manager / EHS
Team/ETP incharge
Monitoring of inlet and outlet quality
of wastewater
Records of wastewater generation and discharge quantity to be maintained.
Also records for recycled treated wastewater to be
maintained.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 223
Objective To reduce surface water pollution
Concern Pollution to surface water
Benefit of EMP Surface water quality will not be impacted by the proposed activity
Impacting Activities
Mitigation Measures and Rationale
Implementation and Management Remarks
Location Timing Responsibility Monitoring Records
sludge shall be used as a manure.
Hazardous waste Management and
Disposal
Hazardous waste shall be segregated at source and stored in hazardous waste
storage area.
Proper area shall be demarcated for the
storage of hazardous waste facilitate with
impervious flooring and bunding to avoid leakage
problem.
Spill control mechanism shall be in place. PPE’s shall be mandatory wile handling the hazardous waste during loading & unloading of wastes.
At Site All time Site EHS
Manager / EHS Team
Periodic Workplace
monitoring shall be carried out
Records of hazardous waste generation and disposal
quantity to be maintained.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 224
10.5 Land and Soil Environment
Table 10-4: Environmental Management Plan -Soil Environment
EI No.
Environmental Indicator (EI)
Monitoring Parameter
Location Period & Frequency Responsibility
B. SITE DEVELOPMENT
B.1 Top Soil
Area occupied for top soil storage/ Area
planned for top soil storage, height of top
soil stockpile
Site Till it is used for green belt, once in a month
I/C Civil works
B.2
Soil used for Land Filling (Soil quality)
EC (Salinity), pH, Organic Carbon (OC),
ESP(Exchangeable sodium percentage)
Site After land is levelled I/C Civil works
B.2 Soil Quality
EC (Salinity), pH, Organic Carbon (OC),
ESP(Exchangeable sodium percentage)
Green belt site
Before raising plantation & once in a
year after post monsoon
Garden-in-Charge
10.6 Ecological Management
10.6.1 Green Belt Development
Green belt not only provides habitat for faunal species but also helps to suppress air and noise pollutants up to
some extent. This will not only mitigate the ecological problem but also enhance the beauty of project area that will
attract avifauna, small mammals & insect species, and by this way ecological balance can be maintained to great
extent.
10.6.2 Greenbelt Designing
Following parameters have been considered to design green belt,
Selection of Plant Species
Considering the environmental status of project area four main parameters like salinity, draught, fire resistance,
species with faster growth rate and ever green nature have been considered while selecting the species. Facts
considered during selection of plant species for greenbelt development are:
Agro climatic zone (Semi-arid to dry sub humid – as per CPCB) of the project area
Evergreen species to mitigate cumulative impacts due to other industries also.
Type of pollutant (mainly air) likely to disperse from project activities.
Biological–filter Efficiency: Absorption of gases, Dust capturing and Noise control.
10.6.3 Locations of the Proposed Greenbelt
Greenbelt will be developed within project site boundary and within various identified locations of LIZ of 1.5 km.
Greenbelt in Within Project Boundary
Total greenbelt area of 50935 (33%) square meters has been allotted for greenbelt development within project
boundary. Considering 16 square meter area (4x4) for one tree, project area will have plantation of 3183 plants of
suggested species. Plantation will be carried out around periphery, near / around built-up areas and along internal
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 225
roads of the project area as well as the plantation of 10000 trees in GIDC land outside the plant premises is also
suggested.
Table 10-5: Plant Species Suggested for Greenbelt and Landscaping at Various Locations
S. No Scientific Name Common Name Ecological
performance Type
Location of Plant
1. Aegle marmelos Bel CN, DC Evergreen A
2. Azardirachta indica Neem CN, OGE, DC Evergreen A,B
3. Delbergia sissoo Shesham DC, DR, FR Evergreen A,B
4. Ficus bengalensis Banyan, Vad CN, DC Evergreen B
5. Ficus religiosa Peepal CN, OGE, DC Evergreen B
6. Syzygium cumini Jamun CN, DC Evergreen B,A
7. Tamarindus indica Emali CN, OGE, DC Evergreen B
8. Morus alba Shetur DC Evergreen B
9. Prosopis cineraria Khejri -- Evergreen B
10. Terminalia arjuna Arjun CN, OGE, DC Evergreen B
11. Anona squamosa Sitafal DC Evergreen A
12. Phoenix sylvestris Palm DC Evergreen A
13. Nerium indicum Landscaping: these species will be planted with in interspaces of trees at various
locations like along road side, around built-up areas and around outer boundary of the project area (not near to fire prone places)
14. Lawsonia inermis
15. Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
Ecological performance: CN –Control Noise level, OGE – Absorb Gas Emission (Sexena 1991)10 and (Abbasi & Khan 2000)11, DC - Dust Controller (CPCB 2007)12.
Location of Plant: A-Around built-up area and along internal road, B-on Project periphery / boundary
Budget Allocation for Greenbelt within Project Site
Greenbelt around the project site will be developed with in initial two years. Detailed budget break-up is given in
Table 10-6.
Table 10-6: Budget for Proposed Greenbelt Development within Project Site
S. No Work or Activity
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year Budget (INR)
Within Project Site, totally 3183 saplings will be planted (Approx. Cost @ Rs. 100 per sapling / plant)
Saplings Required 635 635 635 635 635 3,17,500
Amount 63500 63500 63500 63500 63500
Outside Plant Premises 500 trees will be planted (Approx. Cost @ Rs. 100 per sapling / plant
Saplings Required 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 10.00,000
Amount 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
Total Budget 13,17,500
10 Saxena, V.S. 1991. Afforestation as a tool for environmental improvement. In: Executive development program on greening the townships. Vaniki Prashikshan
Sansthan, Jaipur. Pp 13-44.
11 Greenbelts for Pollution Control: Concepts, Design, Applications. 2000. Abbasi, S.A. and F.I. Khan. Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi.
12 Phytoremediation of particulate matter from ambient environment through dust capturing plant species. Published 2007 by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB),
Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India in Delhi.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 226
Greenbelt in the LIZ Area (within 1.5 Km. Radius)
Additional plantation for green belt development will be carried out in the various places (around water bodies, in
school and temple premises) of LIZ to improve habitat status of the project area. This activity will be carried out as
a part of conservation plan of Schedule-I reported from the study area, so species recommended for plantation and
budget allocation for same is given in the conservation plan section.
10.6.4 Plantation Technique and Care
Plantation Technique
Following basic procedures need to be followed for greening the area.
Since the project area having poor / slightly saline soil quality, plantation of tree species required approx.
1m3 pit for soil enrichment
Pit should be filled with imported soil with 3:1:1 the ratio of sand, silt and form yard manure
Procure well grown saplings of recommended species from the nearby Forest Department nursery
Make 1m diameter ring bund around the planted saplings for water retention
Watering of sapling is species specific, therefore watering need to be done daily in monsoon and once in 2
days in other seasons for a period of two years.
10.7 Rainwater Harvesting
For rainwater collection and recharge calculations, areas like process and storage, Godown, scrap yard etc. are
excluded due to having chances of contamination. Storm water generated from such areas must be stored,
internally used and not allowed to drain outside premises.
Storm water generated from admin buildings, paved area and green belt area can be used to recharge ground
water. In order to use rainwater to meet the water requirement for some period, construction of rainwater
harvesting as well as rainwater recharging may be possible at the site.
As per IMD data average rainfall of Bharuch is 912.1 mm/annum (0.912 m). The estimated runoff quantum using
different run off coefficient applicable for roof top, Green belt and Roads is given below;
Table 10-7: Land Area Breakup and Estimation of Runoff
S. No. Title Area, m2 Rainfall intensity
(m) Runoff coefficient
Runoff generated (m3)
1
Roof top
(admin & security building)
570 0.912 0.8 415.87
2 Road 32,435 0.912 0.5 14,790.36
3 Greenbelt 50,935 0.912 0.2 9,290.54
Total 24,496.77
From the above it is inferred that ~24,496.77 m3 effective run off water may likely to be available that can be
stored in the proposed tank for reuse.
Average rainwater available per day = 24,496.77 m3/365 rainy days/annum =67 m3/day
The likely storing capacity of proposed pond/tank will be 5 m×5 m×3 m i.e. to store 75 m3/day
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 227
10.8 Occupational Health Management Plan
10.8.1 Noise
Noise will be regularly monitored plant boundary for checking compliance against environmental noise parameters
as per CPCB norms. It will also be monitored near noise generating equipment to ensure that all noise generating
equipment do not emit noise in excess of the statutory norms.
All workmen will be provided with required set of PPEs like ear plug, ear muff etc. where noise levels in excess of
80 db (A) are regularly generated.
Preventive maintenance of noise generating equipment shall be regularly carried out to ensure that noise levels are
minimized to the extent possible. To the extent feasible, equipment will be purchased considering noise generation
as one of the parameters.
10.8.2 Heat
The project does not envisage conditions that could lead to excess heating. Consequently, special requirements for
protection against heat stress are not anticipated. However, the following shall be carried out:
Ventilation shall be provided to take care of heat evacuation.
Drinking water availability shall be ensured at several locations within the plant to ensure workers have
easy access to the same.
In case of occasional handling of heated equipment or materials, suitable PPEs such as heat resistant
gloves will be used.
10.8.3 Dust, other Chemicals being suspended in the Environment
The possibility of suspended particles going into the body of the workmen, either in the form of inhalation,
ingestion or through skin absorption are least and negligible as because the entire operation at the plant will be
performed under closed loop condition, right from charging till discharging, hence it’s a rare possibility that the
workmen will come in direct contact with raw material or final goods.
At the same time the level of SPM and RPM will definitely be of least and nominal value. But even though the same
will be under closed monitoring and periodical surveillance as per EIA norms and applicable legislations and any
minor deviation from the same will be dealt immediately and will be corrected.
Further to this all of the workmen will be provided with complete set of appropriate PPEs, like nose musk / nose
respirator, gloves, helmet, protective uniform and clothing, eye protections etc.
10.8.4 Occupational Hazards Specific Pre-placement and Periodic Monitoring
As per policy and norms all of the workmen are put to medical examination and testing periodically and at set
interval and based on the medical report actions are taken, if at all anything is necessary and required. Even based
on the medical examination report/feedback, workmen are counselled and put in different area /job rotation kind of
activities. Following are the periodic tests conducted by DPL.
Physical examination
Vision
Color vision
Audiometry
Chest X-ray
ECG
Pulmonary function test
CBC
ESR
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 228
Blood sugar
Creatinine
Uric acid
Blood urea nitrogen
SGOT, SGPT, serum bilirubin,
Serum cholesterol
Urine routine microscopic
TSH
10.9 Socio-Economic Environment
As a corporate social responsibility DPL will do some following activities with the cooperation with Deepak
Foundation. Deepak Foundation has carried out so many activities till date in various areas. From that, mobile
health unit is major activity they started;
Mobile Health Unit
Objective
Provide primary health care services to population residing in remote areas.
Activities Undertaken
Provide preventive, promotive and curative services through OPD services and free medications
Organizing periodic medical camps
ANC/PNC screening & basic diagnostic tests
Counseling Services
Awareness of government health schemes & facilitates its utilization
Referrals for complicated cases
Features Dahej
Years since Inception 4 years (Initiated in Nov 2013)
District Bharuch
Area Vagra
Population Type Rural
Total Population 46,728
Coverage: villages 36
No. of Staff 4
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 229
Photographs 10-1: CSR Activities
10.9.1 Budgetary Provision
In addition to the existing infrastructure further improvement will be carried out in the field of providing new
crematorium/burial grounds, hospital, veterinary centre, sanitation facilities, renovation of the internal village roads
etc. The project proponent is committed towards the Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC). Various community
development/Social Welfare activities will be implemented with a total provision of Rs. 10 crores (approx.) of the
capital expenses for the next 5 years.
The project proponent is committed to spend 2.5% of the cost of project on ESC as mentioned in the Table 10-8.
Table 10-8: Enterprise Social Commitment (Initial 5 Years)
S. No.
Proposed Activity
Amount (Rs/Lakhs) per year
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
2020-2021
2021-2022
Total Amount
1 Educational Activities 34.75 38.23 42.05 46.25 50.88 212
2 Medical & Health Facilities 27.55 30.31 33.34 36.67 40.34 168
3 Safe Drinking Water 21.35 23.49 25.83 28.42 31.26 130
4 Infrastructure Development/Sanitation
& Drainage System 52.50 57.75 63.53 69.88 76.87 321
5 Skill Development/Training Program 27.60 30.36 33.40 36.74 40.41 169
Total Amount per Year 163.75 180.13 198.14 217.95 239.75 1,000
Total provision for 5 years - Rupees One Thousand Lakhs (10 Crores)
In addition to above the project proponent shall retain 2% CSR expense as per section 135 of the Companies Act
2013 for the socio-economic development of the study area.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 230
10.10 Expenditure on Environmental Matter
The expenditure to be incurred by DPL on environmental matters is given in Table 10-9.
Table 10-9: Expenditure on Environmental Matters
S. No.
Head Approximate recurring cost per annum (Rs. in
lacs)
Approximate Capital cost (Rs. In Lacs)
Basis for cost estimates
1. Air pollution
control 5.50 1200.0
The capital cost would include cost of providing adequate height of the stack,
ladder and platform and recurring cost would include cost of monitoring of air environment.
2. Water pollution
control 4.3 725.2
Capital cost would include cost of ETP. In capital cost civil work, mechanical work,
electrical work and piping work is included. Recurring cost is cost of treatment of
wastewater at site
3. Noise pollution
monitoring 0.12 10.0
Assuming that DG sets used will be new and will be provided with acoustic enclosures, the
recurring cost would include cost of noise monitoring
4. Solid and
hazardous waste management
0.5
5.00
Capital cost would include cost of providing storage space for hazardous waste and
membership of TSDF Fee. Recurring cost would include cost of land filling and
transportation.
5. Environment
monitoring and management
0.18
0.25 The recurring cost would be incurred on
hiring of consultants and payment of various statutory fees to regulatory agencies.
6. Green belt 2.38 24.55 -
Total 12.98 1965
The total estimated cost of project is INR ~400 crores. Approximate capital cost on environmental issue will be INR
~1965 Lac and recurring cost INR ~12.98 Lac/ Annum.
10.11 Environmental Management Cell
An environment management cell shall be created which shall perform the following functions:
Achieve objectives of the ‘Environment Protection Policy’ of the management.
Collect information from regular monitoring and create a database.
Analyze the data and decide thrust area.
Based on the data collected, decide target for each thrust area.
Carry out ‘Projects’ in each thrust area to arrive at practical solutions to environmental problems.
Discuss the reports of study on environment and disseminate the information.
Work out ‘Action plan’ for implementation of the recommendations made in the reports.
Prepare Management Information System (MIS) reports and budget for environment management
program.
The Plant Manager will be responsible for environmental issues at plant. The responsibilities of the various
members of the environment management cell are given in Table 10-10 .
Table 10-10: Environment Management Cell
S. No. Designation Proposed responsibility
1. Managing Director / Director Environmental policy and directions
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 231
S. No. Designation Proposed responsibility
2. General Manager (Operations) Overall responsibility for environmental management and decision
making for all environmental issues
3. Plant Manager Overall in-charge of operation of environmental management facilities
of respective sections.
4. Manager (Utilities) Secondary responsibility for environmental management and decision
making for all environmental issues
5. EHS in-charge
Ensure environmental monitoring as per appropriate procedures
Ensure correct records of generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of solid hazardous wastes.
Ensuring legal compliance by properly undertaking activities as laid down by various regulatory agencies from time to time and interacting
with the same and arranging awareness programme among the workers
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 232
11 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
11.1 Introduction and Background
Deepak Phenolics Limited (formerly known as Deepak Clean Tech Limited) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Deepak
Nitrite Limited.
The proposed expansion of Cumene/Phenol project is located at existing plant of Dahej, Gujarat INDIA. Technology
and engineering services are being provided by Kellogg, Brown & Root International Inc. (KBR), USA for Phenol and
by UOP LLC, USA for Cumene. The EPCM contractor is ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly
known as UHDE, India) for both Phenol and Cumene. This is being set up as per MOU with the Government of
Gujarat during Vibrant Gujarat Summit 2011.
The company has also decided to put up Cyclohexanone plant, Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK) plant, Isopropyl
Alcohol (IPA) plant and Acetophenone Plant at Dahej, Gujarat within the same plot. This is being submitted for
Vibrant Gujarat Summit 2017.
11.2 The Project
The proposed project is an expansion project to expand the Cumene/Phenol plant and to put up Phenol and
Acetone derivative products like Cyclohexanone plant, Methyl-Isobutyl-Ketone (MIBK) plant and Acetophenone
Plant as a part of downstream derivatives at the same location. The proposed expansion is located at Plot No.
12/B/1, GIDC Dahej, Taluka Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat. The estimated cost of the proposed expansion is INR
~400 Crores. Total plot area is 1,63,645 m2. Out of that, 1,40,125.73 m2 is owned by Deepak Phenolics Limited and
balance 23,519.27 m2 area is taken on lease from Deepak Nitrite Limited.
11.3 Regulatory Framework
Products falling under project/activities listed within the Schedule to the EIA notification dated September 14th
2006 (amended till date) requires prior Environmental Clearance (EC) from the Impact Assessment Authority (IAA)
at the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) (for Category A project) or the State Level
Environmental Impact Assessment Authorities (SEIAA) (for Category B projects).
The existing EC on the name of Deepak Phenolics Limited is No. SEIAA/GUJ/EC/5(f), 4(d) & 1(d)/634/2016 dated
29th October 2016. Proposed expansion is for Schedule 5 (f) and 5 (e) namely “Synthetic Organic Chemical” and
“Petrochemical based Processing” requiring Environmental Clearance from SEIAA, Gujarat as the project site is
located within Notified Industrial Area. So it is considered as B category project.
11.4 Project details
11.4.1 Cost of the Project
The cost of the proposed expansion is INR ~ 400 Crores.
11.4.2 Area Statement
Total plot area for the project is 163645 m2, which includes 50935 m2 for greenbelt development, 32435 m2 as road
area and open area.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 233
11.4.3 Power Requirement
DPL has applied for 19 MW (20 MVA) power connection to Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (DGVCL). A captive
power plant of 42 MW is also there. Existing 1 DG Set of Capacity of 1500 kVA is used as a backup in emergency.
Another 1 DG Set of Capacity of 1500 kVA is proposed in amendment.
11.4.4 Water Resources and Water Quality
Source
For the proposed expansion, main source of water is available from GIDC Dahej. Existing water requirement is 2048
KLD (Environment Clearance received) which will be increased up to 8481 KLD after proposed expansion. Out of
8481 KLD, fresh water used will be 7099 KLD and 1382 KLD will be recycled water. To reduce fresh water demand
adequate measures will be proposed at site as below.
1. Recycling RO will be installed and RO permeate will be used for cooling tower make up.
2. Drip irrigation system will be provided to reduce fresh water demand.
3. Condensate recovery from the boiler will be increased.
4. Washing wastewater will be again reuse in washing activities wherever possible.
By adopting all these measures overall water demand will be reduced so natural resource will be conserved and
minimum water will be sourced from the surface water body.
Wastewater
Waste water generation from the proposed expansion will be segregated at source and treated in proposed ETP
followed by RO which will reduce the discharge quantity of treated wastewater. The permeate water from the RO
will be reused in cooling tower make and reject water will be discharged into GIDC drain. There will be no disposal
of untreated wastewater outside the plant premises. Hence will have no adverse impact on surface water quality.
Existing wastewater generation as per Environment Clearance received is 949 KLD. Additional wastewater
generation will be 1417 KLD which will be recycled. So after expansion total wastewater generation will be 2366
KLD out of which 1417 KLD will be recycled and 949 KLD will be discharged to GIDC drain for final disposal.
11.4.5 Air Emission
After proposed expansion 2 boilers, 1 incinerator and 2 DG sets will be instated at site.
11.4.6 Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility
Hazardous waste will be disposed to M/s. Saurastra Enviro Projects Pvt. Ltd. (SEPPL) for Integrated Common
Hazardous Waste Management Facility.
11.5 Description of Environment
Baseline environmental studies were carried out during 12 weeks of the summer season of the year 2017.
11.5.1 Study Period
The study period is summer season i.e. March- May of the year 2017.
11.5.2 Study Area
The study area is defined as area within 10 km radius from the project site.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 234
11.5.3 Landuse of the Study Area
Landuse within 10 km radius of the study area has been determined with the help of satellite imagery.
11.5.4 Climatology
The climatological data presented on the basis of information collected by the meteorological station set up in the
study area for a period of three months.
Site specific meteorological data shows that average wind speed in summer season of year 2017 is 3.5 m/s
and maximum wind speed of 8.3 m/s.
It can be observed that in summer season, wind blows mostly from West South West sector.
Average temperature recorded for summer season was 33.2°C with maximum temperature of 44°C and
minimum of 11°C which is a characteristic of this study area.
Ambient Air Quality
Ambient air monitoring was carried out at 8 locations in the study area in the month of March to May of year 2014-
15 i.e. the winter season. A comparison of results obtained during monitoring with the range indicators provided by
CPCB indicates the followings.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 235
Sta
tio
n C
od
e
Sa
mp
lin
g
Lo
ca
tio
n
Dis
tan
ce
in
Km
fro
m
Ce
ntr
e o
f
Pro
ject
Sit
e
Dir
ecti
on
Average Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3 and VOC in ppm)
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX NH3 HBr HCL Cl2 HCs CO VOC
[24 Hours] [1 Hour] [8 Hours] [1 Hour]
100 60 80 80 400 NS NS NS NS 2 NS
AAQ001 DPL Project
Site 0.00 Base 82 33 <8.0 17.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1327 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ002 Ambheta Village
0.85 SSW 83 32 <8.0 18.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1282 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ003 Lakhigam
Village 3.86 W 98 43 14.5 20.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1567 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ004 Dahej Village 1.64 NW 91 37 <8.0 22.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1334 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ005 Suva Village 6.00 ESE 77 27 <8.0 17.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1185 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ006 EPL Project
Site 2.11 NNE 71 26 <8.0 17.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1327 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ007 Nr. Vajapura
Village 6.4 NNE 65 25 8.5 12.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1114 <1.142 <1.0
AAQ008 Vadadla Village
4.93 NE 81 32 11.0 30.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1075 <1.142 <1.0
A comparison of the above results with the value range indicators provided by CPCB indicates that all the parameters are well within the limit.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 236
11.5.5 Noise
Noise monitoring was done at 8 locations within the study area. The results are given in following table,
Location Code
Location Date Category
CPCB Limits in dB (A) Average Noise levels
in dB (A)
Day Time
Night Time
Day Time Night Time
NL01 At project Boundary (NE) 11-Apr-17 Industrial 75.0 70.0 69.0 60.9
NL02 At project site (ETP) 11-Apr-17 Industrial 75.0 70.0 69.1 66.0
NL03 At Project boundary (East) 09-Apr-17 Industrial 75.0 70.0 65.5 63.7
NL04 Admin Office 10-Apr-17 Industrial 75.0 70.0 65.5 63.7
NL05 Nr. DG Set 09-Apr-17 Industrial 75.0 70.0 69.7 65.5
NL06 Main gate 10-Apr-17 Industrial 75.0 70.0 69.8 65.4
NL07 Ambetha village 12-Apr-17 Residential 55.0 45.0 55.5 44.9
NL08 Dahej village 12-Apr-17 Residential 55.0 45.0 54.8 45.1
Noise level during day time and night time, in Industrial area was observed within the CPCB standards i.e. industrial
area (75 dBA (d) & 70 dBA (n)).Noise level during daytime and night time, in Residential area was observed within
the CPCB standards i.e. residential area (55 dBA (d) & 45 dBA (n)).
11.5.6 Ground Water Quality
Ground water samples were collected at 7 locations as shown in following table.
Code Location Date of
Sampling Source
Distance in Km from Centre of Project Site
Direction Results Higher than Permissible Limits
GW 1 Vadadla 12.05.2017 Dug well 4.82 NE Fluoride
GW 2 Dahej 12.05.2017 Dug well 2.05 N -
GW 3 Galenda 12.05.2017 Dug well 9.18 NE -
GW 4 Rahiyad 12.05.2017 Dug well 7.56 E -
GW 5 Jolva 12.05.2017 Dug well 5.77 E Fluoride
GW 6 Koliyad 12.05.2017 Dug well 9.74 E -
GW 7 Ambetha 12.05.2017 Bore well 0.90 S -
11.5.7 Surface Water Quality
Surface water samples were collected at 5 locations as shown in following table.
Code Location Source Date of
Sampling
Distance in Km from Centre of
Project Site Direction
Results Higher than Permissible Limits
SW 1 Vadadala Pond 27.04.17 5.26 NE Quality of River water can be compared with class D as per classification of Inland Surface Water and use for propagation
of wild life and fisheries.
SW 2 Vav Pond 27.04.17 8.10 NE
SW 3 Kadodara Pond 27.04.17 9.08 NNE
SW 4
Narmada river (D/s)
near Ambeta
Estuary 27.04.17 1.82 S The Quality of Narmada
estuary is nearly matching with class SW-II (Bathing, Contact Water Sports and Commercial Fishing) as per causal water
marine standards. SW 5 Narmada river (U/s) near Suva
Estuary 27.04.17 6.68 ESE
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 237
11.5.8 Soil
Surface soil samples were taken from 5 locations as mentioned in following table.
Code Location Date of Sampling Distance in Km from Centre of Project Site
Direction Type of Soil
S 1 Galenda 12-05-2017 9.18 NE Clay loam
S 2 Rahiyad 12-05-2017 7.56 E Clay loam
S 3 Jolva 12-05-2017 5.77 E Sandy clay loam
S 4 Vadadala 12-05-2017 4.82 NE Clay loam
S 5 Koliyad 12-05-2017 9.74 E Sandy loam
11.5.9 Biological Environment
No National Park or Sanctuary falls within buffer zone. However, two Reserve Forest (RF) areas falls in the buffer
zone of the study area i.e. Dahej RF and Lakhigam. These forest areas encompass mainly common species like
Prosopis juliflora (invasive species) and shrubs like Datura metel, Calotropis gigantea and Lantana camera are
common.
Flora
Project site was reported with six common species of flora / plants. Buffer zone has been reported 155 floral
species, which includes 53 species of trees (25 families), 30 species of Shrubs (21 families), 50 species of herbs (27
families), 8 species of grasses (one family) and 14 species of climbers (6 families).
Fauna
Core Zone / Project Site
No herpetofauna or mammals reported from the project site.
Buffer Zone
Overall 8 herpetofaunal species have been reported from the buffer zone.
Overall 47 species of birds from 24 families have been reported from the buffer zone area.
Totally 9 species from six families have been enlisted from buffer zone of the project area.
11.5.10 Socio- Economics
The project study area consists of 17 villages /habitation falling in Vagra taluka of Bharuch district.
11.6 Environment Impact Identification, Prediction and Mitigation
11.6.1 Air Environment
Impact Identification
Activities causing air emissions of various pollutants due to operation of proposed expansion.
24 hr. Average Incremental Increase in GLC
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 238
S. No.
Name of Village/ Industry
(Distance in km/
Direction)
Pollutant
Average Monitored Baseline
Concentration
(µg/m3)
Incremental GLC
(µg/m3)
Total Predictive GLC due to expansion
(µg/m3)
Indian Coal
Imported Coal
Imported Coal + Lignite
Indian Coal
Imported Coal
Imported Coal + Lignite
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C4 + C5
C4 + C6 C4 + C7
AA 1
At Project Site
(0.00/Base)
(Industrial, Residential,
Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 82 1.07 1.026 2.41 83.07 83.026 84.41
SO2 <8.0 0.053 0.151 0.53 <8.053 <8.151 <8.53
NOX 17.2 0.082 0.087 0.095 17.282 17.287 17.295
HC 1327 0.619 1327.619
AA 2
At Ambheta Village
(0.85/SSW)
(Industrial, Residential,
Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 83 0.42 0.403 0.95 83.42 83.403 83.95
SO2 <8.0 0.019 0.058 0.21 <8.019 <8.058 <8.021
NOX 18.5 0.025 0.028 0.057 18.525 18.528 18.557
HC 1282 0.328 1282.328
AA 3
At Lakhigam Village
(3.86/W)
(Industrial, Residential,
Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 98 0.15 0.147 0.35 98.15 98.147 98.35
SO2 14.5 0.005 0.019 0.07 14.505 14.519 14.57
NOX 20.4 0.003 0.004 0.006 20.403 20.404 20.406
HC 1567 0.033 1567.033
AA 4
At Dahej Village
(1.64/NW)
(Industrial, Residential,
Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 91 0.22 0.209 0.49 91.22 91.209 91.49
SO2 <8.0 0.007 0.028 0.11 <8.007 <8.028 <8.11
NOX 22.2 0.009 0.010 0.011 22.209 22.21 22.211
HC 1334 0.083 1334.083
AA 5
At Suva Village
(6.00/ESE)
(Industrial, Residential,
Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 77 0.18 0.173 0.41 77.18 77.173 77.41
SO2 <8.0 0.008 0.024 0.09 <8.008 <8.024 <8.09
NOX 17.8 0.009 0.011 0.013 17.809 17.811 17.813
HC 1185 0.075 1185.075
AA 6
EPL Project Site
(2.11/ NNE)
(Industrial, Residential,
Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 71 0.21 0.198 0.47 71.21 71.198 71.47
SO2 <8.0 0.007 0.027 0.10 <8.007 <8.027 <8.10
NOX 17.2 0.013 0.013 0.013 17.213 17.213 17.213
HC 1327 0.088 1327.088
AA 7
At Vajapura Village
(6.4/NNE)
PM10 65 0.10 0.091 0.22 65.10 65.091 65.22
SO2 8.5 0.004 0.012 0.05 8.504 8.512 8.55
NOX 12.8 0.006 0.007 0.007 12.806 12.807 12.807
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 239
S. No.
Name of Village/ Industry
(Distance in km/
Direction)
Pollutant
Average Monitored Baseline
Concentration
(µg/m3)
Incremental GLC
(µg/m3)
Total Predictive GLC due to expansion
(µg/m3)
Indian Coal
Imported Coal
Imported Coal + Lignite
Indian Coal
Imported Coal
Imported Coal + Lignite
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C4 + C5
C4 + C6 C4 + C7
(Industrial, Residential,
Rural & Other Areas)
HC 1114 0.045 1114.045
AA 8
At Vadala Village
(4.93/NE)
(Industrial, Residential,
Rural & Other Areas)
PM10 81 0.40 0.383 0.90 81.40 81.383 81.90
SO2 11.0 0.018 0.054 0.20 11.018 11.054 11.20
NOX 30.9 0.025 0.028 0.031 30.925 30.928 30.931
HC 1075 0.172 1075.172
Total predicted GLC for proposed expansion is compared with CPCB limits. All parameters are well within prescribed
limit.
Mitigation Measures
Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) is provided on two boilers.
DPL has provided chilled water condensers and activated carbon bed adsorbers to remove VOCs from
spent air. However, to make sure that no VOCs is released to atmosphere and for additional protection
spent air incinerator is provided.
To burn lighter hydrocarbon from process emergency relief system a flare is provided. Flare height is 65 m
and it is decided to take care of maximum possible relief from the plant.
Bag-filter is provided on crusher house to reduce PM emission.
Greenbelt will be developed at the facility.
Attenuation of pollution/protection of receptor through greenbelt/green cover.
Regular monitoring of air polluting concentrations.
All vehicles shall be PUC Certified from time to time.
Proper PPE like dust masks will be provided to workers.
11.6.2 Noise Environment
Impact Identification
Generation of noise from the proposed project during operation will occur due to machinery, vehicle movement, DG
Set, boiler and incinerator etc. However their effect will be localized and transient in nature and will principally
affect the facilities adjacent to the access road.
Mitigation Measures
Acoustic Enclosures on all major equipment in the plant will have to be provided for noise attenuation
Workers should also be provided with suitable personal protective equipment (PPE) such as earmuffs and
earplugs.
Rotation of workers in the high noise area.
High noise generating areas would be identified and tags marked.
Green belt will be developed to reduce noise.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 240
Vehicle trips to be minimized to the extent possible.
Acoustic mufflers / enclosures to be provided in large engines/machineries.
Equipment to be maintained in good working order.
Implement good working practices (equipment selection) to minimize noise and reduce its impacts on
human health (earmuffs, safe distances, and enclosures).
Noise to be monitored in ambient air within the premises.
All equipment operated within specified design parameters
11.6.3 Surface Water
Impact Prediction
No any untreated water will be disposed of outside the plant area to avoid impact on surface water quality and
land.
Mitigation Measures
Following mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce surface water related impacts:
Treated water will be recycled and reused in plant premises through recycling RO.
Explore the possibility of condensate recovery from the boiler which will reduce the overall water demand.
Wastewater from the washing activities will again reuse in washing purpose.
Drip irrigation system will be proposed to reduce fresh water demand for gardening.
Proper operation and maintenance of effluent treatment plant & RO will be done to ensure meeting
specified disposal standards and also no discharge of untreated waste water on land, avoiding leakages;
Provide separate drainage for storm water and effluent to avoid any contamination of surface water
sources;
All chemical and fuel storage and handling areas will be provided with proper bunds to avoid run-off
contamination.
Hazardous Wastes will be properly handled in containers and properly stored in hazardous waste storage
areas as per rules and also bunding will be provided to avoid overflow of spillage waters which can
contaminate the surroundings.
Recyclable waste will be handed over to authorized recyclers and other hazardous waste will be disposed
at approved TSDF facility
11.6.4 Ground Water and Geology
No adverse impact on ground water. Impact on ground water due to leakage during chemical transportation,
storage of chemicals and storage of hazardous waste.
Mitigation Measures
This being a notified area the concept of water conserve is water produce can be used here. The stored run off
water from green belt are roof top and Paved are can be used as a supplemental water supply to reduce fresh
water consumption to some extent.
11.6.5 Land Environment
Impact Identification& Mitigation Measures
Spillage of materials may be taken care of to avoid soil contamination and deterioration.
Spillage of paints, oil, diesel etc. take care to avoid soil contamination
If soil becomes saline/alkaline due to use of ETP wastewater/ municipal solid waste etc.; use gypsum,
organic manures and provide drainage for removal of excess salt
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 241
11.6.6 Biological Environment
Impact Identification& Mitigation Measures
As Though the concentrations of the emitted pollutants will be kept within permissible levels through the various
engineering controls, it is essential to have eco-management in the Likely Impact Zone (LIZ) for safeguard and
enhanced of ecological environment of the project area.
11.6.7 Socio-Economic Environment
Impact Identification
The plant does not have any potential negative impact on the habitations. The Social Management Plan (SMP)
therefore concentrates on mitigation of perceived impacts during the running of plant.
Mitigation Measures
Emphasizes will be given on the followings;
Health,
Hygiene,
Education issues.
Overall, the project would improve quality of life of the villages in the vicinity and also the surroundings.
The project proponent is committed towards the Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC). Various community
development/Social Welfare activities will be implemented with a total provision of Rs. ~10 crores of the capital
expenses for the next 5 years.
11.6.8 Hazard Identification and Consequence Analysis
On the basis of the study of the chemical properties like flash point, phase of chemical, operating conditions and
total inventory etc. following chemicals have been selected to carry out consequence analysis.
Acetone, Benzene, Phenol, Propylene, Hydrogen & Cumene.
Major failures selected for the analysis are 10 mm& 20mm leak as maximum credible scenario and catastrophic
rupture as worst case.
Mitigation Measures
Medical check-up would be carried out at a regular intervals
Appropriate PPEs will be provided to site workers and staff members
Appropriate personnel protective clothing to be used to prevent skin contact.
Safety Goggles will be used to prevent eye contact.
Hand gloves of natural rubber, neoprene, and polyvinyl chloride will be used as and when required
Acoustic enclosures will be provided to DG sets and other noise generating equipment
DPL will develop and implement a spill management plan to prevent risk of spill which may cause health
problem.
11.7 Project Benefits
The project benefits are summarized as follows:
Substantial Socio-economic benefits
Good Techno-commercial viability
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 242
Employment to the semi-skilled and unskilled workmen located around the project site during operation
phase.
Infrastructural facilities will be improved due to the proposed expansion.
11.8 Environmental Management and Monitoring Plant
11.8.1 Environmental Management Plan
The EMP is prepared with a view to facilitate an effective environmental management of the project in general and
implementation of the mitigation measures in particular. The EMP provides a delivery mechanism to address
potential adverse impacts and to introduce standards of good practice to be adopted for entire project works. For
each stage of the programme, the EMP lists all the requirements to ensure effective mitigation of every potential
biophysical and socio-economic impact identified in the EIA. For each impact or operation that could otherwise give
rise to impact, the following information is presented:
A comprehensive listing of the mitigation measures (actions) that DPL will implement;
The parameters that will be monitored to ensure effective implementation of the action
11.8.2 Environmental Monitoring Plan
Environmental monitoring plan is given below:
S. No. Activity Schedule
Air Pollution Monitoring
1 Ambient air monitoring of parameters specified by GPCB in their air consents from
time to time within the premises Once in Month or as per EC
and CTO
2 Stack Monitoring of process stacks/ vents & flue gas stacks as given in air consent
from time to time Once in Month or as per EC
and CTO
3 Ambient air monitoring of parameters specified by GPCB in their air consents from
time to time at stations outside the premises Once in Month or as per EC
and CTO
4 Work Place Monitoring Once in quarter
Water Pollution Monitoring
1 Monitoring of water consumed in various activities and waste water generated
from various areas of plants Daily
2 Monitoring of wastewater inlet and outlet at ETP plant for the principal parameters
(such as pH, SS, TDS, COD, BOD). Daily
3 Monitoring of other parameters as per PCB consent conditions in outlet of ETP
Waste Water Once in every month or as
per EC and CTO
4 Monitoring of STP inlet and outlet for the parameters (such as, pH, COD, BOD,
TDS & SS) Daily
5 Monitoring of ground water samples at site. Parameters are essential parameters
as per IS: 10500:2012. Once in a year
Noise Quality Monitoring
1 Work Place Noise Monitoring Once in six months
2 Ambient Noise Monitoring Once in six months
Solid Waste Generation Monitoring/Record Keeping
1 Monitoring of solid / hazardous waste generated from process and ETP area. Quarterly
2 Records of generation of Solid / Hazardous Wastes Daily
3 Record of storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid / hazardous
wastes to recyclers, Re-processor, and CTDF. Daily
Environmental Statement
1 Environmental Statement under EP(Act) 1986 Once in a year
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 243
11.9 Summary and Conclusion
It can be concluded from overall assessment of the impacts in terms of positive and negative effects on various
environmental components that the project activities will not have any adverse effect on the surrounding
environment.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 244
12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS
12.1 Brief Resume and Nature of Consultancy Rendered by Kadam Environmental
Consultants
Kadam Environmental Consultants (KEC) was established in 1981 and has more than 3 decades of varied
experience in the field of environment. The mission of company is providing sustainable solutions on “Environment
for Development”.
The company has a dedicated and experienced team of more than 200 technical staff. The team comprise of
Environmental Planners and Engineers, Chemical and Civil Engineers, Geologist, Socio-Economic Experts,
Microbiologists, Zoologists, Botanists and Industrial/Analytical Chemists. The company’s strength lies in Project
Management, Performing Risk Assessment, Formulating Environmental Disaster Plans, Use of Satellite Imagery in
Impact Assessment, Use of Mathematical Models for Air, Water and Soil Assessment and Expertise in Public
Consultation.
Customer services are mainly categorized into:
Consultancy services in the field of environmental impact assessment, environmental site assessment and
due diligence, Enviro legal services, statutory environmental audits/ statements, risk assessments and
HAZOP, energy audit, environmental health and safety management systems and waste management
systems.
Engineering Services for collection and conveyance of liquid and solid wastes, designing and executing
effluent and sewage treatment plants, municipal solid waste studies and solid waste management
systems, bio gas plants, rain water harvesting systems and deep sea marine disposal systems.
Laboratory services in chemical and waste testing, microbiology, soil testing and Field sampling (we have
amongst the highest number of environmental field sampling equipment amongst environmental
companies in the country). The company has a well-equipped laboratory with modern instruments and
experienced staff catering to the need of statutory and advisory environmental testing for air, water and
wastewater and hazardous solid waste. Laboratory has received NABL Accreditation.
The group has a varied industrial clientele encompassing Indian and Multinational Companies covering the industrial
and services spectrum viz. Bulk Drugs and Pharmaceuticals, Paints, Chemicals, Oil and Gas, Real Estate, Hospitality
and Infrastructure sectors. Whilst the heart of our clientele encompasses the top 50/Blue Chip Indian companies (
Reliance Industries, ONGC, Infosys, ITC, ICICI, Indian Oil, GAIL, GSPC/GSPL, Sun Pharma, NTPC, Reliance
Energy/Reliance Power, Welspun and many others) who have placed implicit trust in us over the decades. We are
increasingly working with several multinationals (such as : ABB, Alstom , Areva , GM, Hindustan Lever, Honeywell,
Kohler, Sabic and Tyco amongst others) who value our deep rooted general domain and India centric functional
knowledge, reasonable costs and comparable services as those offered by our multinational competitors. Their
continued patronage is our biggest testimonial.
The Group has branch offices at Delhi and other places in Gujarat.
KEC has received ISO 9001:2008 certification for its Quality Management System.
The company is accredited EIA Consultant organization by NABET, Quality Council of India under EIA accreditation
scheme as per mandatory requirement of the MOEF, Govt. of India for carrying out Environmental Clearance
studies. It has approved EIA coordinators and Field Area Experts for undertaking Environmental and related studies
in eleven approved sectors.
Kadam’s laboratory is accredited with NABL and also gazette by MoEF under EP Act.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 245
12.2 EIA Team Members
Work presented in this report was carried out by KEC with active co-operation from M/s. Deepak Phenolics Limited.
The names of the EIA co-ordinator and FAEs deployed for the project are mentioned at the start of the report (in
Quality Control section). KEC team members (along with their role in the project) include:
Name Areas NABET Designation (if
any) Involvement / Tasks
Dhara Patel AEC EIA Coordinator ‘B’ & FAE
RH
Site Visit, assist in identification of impact of the
project & suggesting mitigation measures, preparation
of EMP & environment budget, key issue identification
in the project, EIA documentation, Identification of
water & effluent generation sources, water balance,
site visit, finalization of monitoring locations, impact
identification, EIA documentation
Heta Bhatt &
Arpana Patel
Air Pollution
Monitoring &
Control (AP)
-
Identification of impacting activities, identification,
checking of air quality data, EIA documentation in
chapter 3 includes checking and compiling of AAQ
results, description of mitigation measures, description
of climate, site specific data
Heta Bhatt &
Arpana Patel
Air Quality
Modeling and
Prediction (AQ)
-
Preparation of emission estimate for stacks,
preparation of MET file, preparation of windrose
diagram, running AERMOD for dispersion modelling,
preparation of contour maps, interpretation of results
Arpana Patel Water Pollution
(WP) -
water balance for the project and contribution to EIA
documentation
Dhara Patel Noise and Vibration
(NV)
EIA Coordinator ‘B’ & FAE
RH
Site visit, communication with client, Assisted the FAE
in calculating Leq, analysis of data, running Noise
software SoundPlan Essential 3.0 for noise modeling,
assisting in identifying impacts and suggesting
mitigation measures
Anup Oza -
Heta Bhatt Risk and Hazards
(RH) -
Site visit, identification of hazardous inventories, study
of MSDS of chemicals, identification of possible
scenarios, running of PHAST for consequence analysis,
generation of contour maps, interpretation of results
Dhara Patel
Solid and
Hazardous Waste
Management
(SHW)
EIA Coordinator ‘B’ & FAE
RH
Identification of waste generated from the industry,
studying adequacy of mitigation measures for
management of hazardous waste
Bhavisha
Pandya Laboratory -
Sample analysis of water, soil and air collected from
the study area as per MoEF requirements.
Kunal Kharva &
Chetan Panchal Drafts Man -
Preparation of landuse maps of study area using GIS /
related tools
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 246
ANNEXURES
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 247
Annexure 1: Terms of Reference Issued by SEIAA, Gujarat
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 248
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 249
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 250
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 251
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 252
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 253
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 254
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 255
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 256
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 257
Annexure 2: Copy of Existing Environmental Clearance
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 258
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 259
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 260
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 261
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 262
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 263
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 264
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 265
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 266
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 267
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 268
Annexure 3: Existing Consent to Established Issued by GPCB
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 269
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 270
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 271
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 272
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 273
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 274
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 275
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 276
Annexure 4: Licensor’s Note on Proposed Capacity Utilization
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 277
Annexure 5: Land Possession Documents from GIDC
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 278
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 279
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 280
Annexure 6: Undertaking Provided by Deepak Phenolics Limited
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 281
Annexure 7: Toposheet of the Project site with Demarcation of Nearest Habitation in 1: 50000 Scale
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 282
Annexure 8: Toposheet of the Project site in 1: 50000 Scale
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 283
Annexure 9: Map Showing Separate Entry, Exist and Tanker Movement at Site
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 284
Annexure 10: Certificate of PESO, Nagpur
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 285
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 286
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 287
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 288
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 289
Annexure 11: Land use/cover classification
The definitions for the first and second level of classification are provided in the following sections.
Built up Land or Habitation
It is defined as an area of human habitation developed due to non-agricultural use and that which has a cover of
buildings, transport, communication utilities in association with water vegetation and vacant lands.
Kadam has chosen to further define this landuse category into additional categories, namely residential and
industrial.
Residential / Commercial
Structures used by humans for living and working, but not including structures used exclusively for manufacturing.
Industrial
Structures used for manufacturing products.
Agricultural Land
It is defined as the land primarily used for farming and for production of food, fibre, and other commercial and
horticultural crops. It includes land under crops (irrigated and un-irrigated), fallow land and plantations. These are
further defined.
Crop Land
It includes those lands with standing crop (per se) as on the date of the satellite imagery. The crops may be of
either Kharif (June-September) or Rabi (October – March) or Kharif Rabi seasons.
Fallow Land
It is described as agricultural land which is taken up for cultivation but is temporarily allowed to rest un-cropped for
one or more seasons, but not less than one year. These lands are particularly those which are seen devoid of crops
at the time when the imagery is taken during Rabi and Kharif.
Plantations
Plantations are described as an area under agricultural tree crops (for e.g. mango plantations) planted adopting
certain agricultural management techniques. It includes tea, coffee, rubber, coconut, arecanut, citrus, orchards and
other horticultural nurseries.
Forests
It is an area (within the notified forest boundary) bearing an association predominantly of trees and other
vegetation types capable of producing timber and other forest produce. Forests can be further divided into sub-
categories mentioned as follows.
Evergreen / Semi-Evergreen Forests
These are forests which comprise thick and dense canopy of tall trees, which predominantly remain green
throughout the year. Such forests include both coniferous and tropical broad-leaved evergreen trees. Semi-
evergreen forests are often a mixture of both deciduous and evergreen trees but the latter predominate.
Deciduous Forests
These are described as forests which predominantly comprise of deciduous species and where the trees shed their
leaves once in a year.
Degraded Forest or Scrub
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 290
It is described as a forest where the vegetative (crown) density is less than 20% of the canopy cover. It is the
result of both biotic and abiotic influences. Scrub is a stunted tree or bush/shrub.
Forest Blank
A forest blank is an opening amidst forests without any tree cover. It includes openings of assorted size and shapes
as seen on the imagery.
Forest Plantations
It is described as an area of trees of species of forestry importance and raised on notified forest lands. It includes
eucalyptus, casuarinas, bamboo, etc.
Mangroves
Mangroves are described as a dense, thicker or woody, aquatic vegetation or forest cover occurring in tidal waters
near estuaries and along the confluence of delta in coastal areas. Mangroves include species of the genera
Rhizophora and Aviccunia.
Wastelands
Wastelands are described as degraded lands which can be brought under vegetative cover with reasonable water
and soil management or on account of natural causes. Wastelands can result from internal / imposed constraints
such as by location, environment, chemical and physical prosperities of the soil or financial or management
constraints.
Different types of wastelands include salt-affected lands, waterlogged lands, marshy/swampy lands, mudlands,
gullied / ravenous lands, land with or without scrub, sandy areas and barren rocky / stony waste / sheet rock areas.
Salt-Affected Land
The salt-affected land is generally characterized as the land that has adverse effects on the growth of most plants
due to the action or presence of excess soluble or high exchangeable sodium. Alkaline land has an exchangeable
sodium percentage (ESP) of about 15, which is generally considered as the limit between normal and alkali soils.
The predominant salts are carbonates and bicarbonates of sodium. Coastal saline soils may be with or without
ingress or inundation by seawater.
Waterlogged Land
Waterlogged land is that land where the water is at/or near the surface and water stands for most of the year.
Such lands usually occupy topographically low-lying areas. It excludes lakes, ponds and tanks or in the context of
the Wetlands (Conservation and Management Rules, 2010) such areas that could be considered as ‘protected
wetlands’.
Marshy / Swampy Land / Mud Land Area
Marshy land is that which is permanently or periodically inundated by water and is characterized by vegetation,
which includes grasses and weeds. Marshes are classified into salt/brackish or fresh water depending on the salinity
of water. These exclude Mangroves.
Gullied / Ravenous Land
The ‘gullies’ are formed as a result of localized surface runoff affecting the friable unconsolidated material in the
formation of perceptible channels resulting in undulating terrain. The gullies are the first stage of excessive land
dissection followed by their networking which leads to the development of ravenous land. The word ‘ravine’ is
usually associated not with an isolated gully but a network of deep gullies formed generally in thick alluvium and
entering a nearby river, flowing much lower than the surrounding high grounds. The ravines are extensive systems
of gullies developed along river courses.
Land with / without Scrub
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 291
They occupy (relatively) higher topography like uplands or high grounds with or without scrub. These lands are
generally prone to degradation or erosion. These exclude hilly and mountainous terrain.
Sandy Area (Coastal and Desertic)
These are the areas, which have stabilized accumulations of sand in-site or transported in coastal riverine or inland
(desert) areas. These occur either in the form of sand dunes, beaches, channel (river/stream) islands, etc.
Barren Rocky / Stony Waste / Sheet Rock Area
It is defined as the rock exposures of varying lithology often barren and devoid of soil cover and vegetation and not
suitable for cultivation. They occur amidst hill forests as openings or scattered as isolated exposures or loose
fragments of boulders or as sheet rocks on plateau and plains. It includes quarry or gravel pit or brick kilns.
Water Bodies
It is an area of impounded water, areal in extent and often with a regulated flow of water. It includes man-made
reservoirs/lakes/tank/canals, besides natural lakes, rivers/streams and creeks.
River / Stream
It is a course of flowing water on the land along definite channels. It includes from a small stream to a big river and
its branches. It may be perennial or non-perennial.
Reservoir / Lakes / Ponds / Tanks
It is a natural or man-made enclosed water body with a regulated flow of water. Reservoirs are larger than
tanks/lakes and are used for generating electricity, irrigation and for flood control. Tanks are smaller in areal extent
with limited use than the former. Canals are inland waterways used for irrigation and sometimes for navigation.
Others
It includes all those landuse and landcover classes which can be treated as miscellaneous because of their nature of
occurrence, physical appearance and other characteristics.
Shifting Cultivation
It is the result of cyclic land use practice of felling of trees and burning of forest areas for growing crops. Such
lands are also known as jhoom lands and cultivation called jhoom cultivation.
Grassland / Grazing Land
It is an area of land covered with natural grass along with other vegetation, often grown for fodder to feed cattle
and other animals. Such lands are found in river beds, on uplands, hill slopes, etc. Such lands can also be called as
permanent pastures or meadows. Grazing lands are those where certain pockets of land are fenced for allowing
cattle to graze.
Snow Covered / Glacial Area
These are snow-covered areas defined as a solid form of water consisting of minute particles of ice. It includes
permanently snow covered areas as on the Himalayas. Glacier is a mass of accumulated ice occurring amidst
permanently snow-covered areas.
Ports/ Harbours
A harbour is a place where ships may shelter from the weather or are stored. Harbors can be man-made or natural.
A man-made harbor will have sea walls or breakwaters and may require dredging. A natural harbor is surrounded
on most sides by land.
A port is a man-made coastal or riverine facility where boats and ships can load and unload. It may consist of
quays, wharfs, jetties, piers and slipways with cranes or ramps. A port may have magazine buildings or warehouses
for storage of goods and a transport system, such as railway, road transport or pipeline transport facilities for
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 292
relaying goods inland. In short a port is used mainly for marine trading and a harbour is used as a parking space or
a storage space for ships
Vegetation Cover
It is a land area predominantly covered with vegetation and is not part of Protected / Reserved Forests. This
includes scrub, open and close vegetation.
Scrub
It is described as a vegetative cover having density is less than 10% of the canopy cover. Scrub is area covered by
grasses or herbs and scattered tree or shrubs.
Open Vegetation
This is also categorized based on the vegetation cover having density between 10% to 20% of the canopy cover.
Close Vegetation
This is also categorized based on the vegetation cover having density greater than 20% of the canopy cover.
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 293
Annexure 12: Photo Documentation
Mudflat with scattered Mangroves at Ambetha Cotton cultivation
Mangroves along the creek Salt pans at Kadodara
Mangroves in Khadi (Creak) Area Mangroves in Khadi (Creak) Area
Vadadala Pond Vav Pond
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 294
Kadodara Pond Narmada Estuary near Suva
Education Facility at Ambheta Village Skill Development Centre at Dahej
Dahej Health & Welfare Society Hospital Primary Health Centre at Ambetha village
Animal Husbandry Agricultural Field at the Study area
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ
GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 295
Primary School at Ambehta Village Consultation with Dahej Sarpanch
Meeting with Ambetha Village Sarpanch Interaction with Adivasis Community
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 296
Annexure 13: Ambient Air Monitoring Results
S. No.
Station Code
Sampling Date
Sampling Location
Area/ Category
Average Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3 and VOC in ppm)
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX NH3 HBr HCl Cl2 HCs CO VOCs
1 AAQ01 08.03.17 DPPL Site Industrial 86 43 8.0 13.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1582 <1.142 <1.0
2 AAQ01 09.03.17 DPPL Site Industrial 81 32 8.0 14.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3 AAQ01 18.03.17 DPPL Site Industrial 98 47 8.0 14.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1163 <1.142 <1.0
4 AAQ01 19.03.17 DPPL Site Industrial 95 41 8.0 14.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5 AAQ01 28.03.17 DPPL Site Industrial 81 35 9.5 25.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1421 <1.142 <1.0
6 AAQ01 29.03.17 DPPL Site Industrial 75 32 8.4 18.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7 AAQ01 07.04.17 DPPL Site Industrial 65 28 10.3 27.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1763 <1.142 <1.0
8 AAQ01 08.04.17 DPPL Site Industrial 88 37 8.0 17.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9 AAQ01 17.04.17 DPPL Site Industrial 108 48 8.0 19.1 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1532 <1.142 <1.0
10 AAQ01 18.04.17 DPPL Site Industrial 84 35 8.0 18.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11 AAQ01 27.04.17 DPPL Site Industrial 61 23 10.2 16.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1498 <1.142 <1.0
12 AAQ01 28.04.17 DPPL Site Industrial 98 36 8.0 18.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
13 AAQ01 07.05.17 DPPL Site Industrial 87 33 8.0 16.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1533 <1.142 <1.0
14 AAQ01 08.05.17 DPPL Site Industrial 65 25 9.7 16.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
15 AAQ01 17.05.17 DPPL Site Industrial 58 21 8.0 15.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1610 <1.142 <1.0
16 AAQ01 18.05.17 DPPL Site Industrial 73 26 8.0 14.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
17 AAQ01 27.05.17 DPPL Site Industrial 78 23 8.0 15.1 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1387 <1.142 <1.0
18 AAQ01 28.05.17 DPPL Site Industrial 87 28 8.0 13.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1 AAQ02 08.03.17 Ambheta Village Residential 89 33 8.0 15.4 <10 <1.0 1.2 <1.0 1163 <1.142 <1.0
2 AAQ02 09.03.17 Ambheta Village Residential 125 60 8.0 15.3 <10 <1.0 1.4 <1.0
3 AAQ02 18.03.17 Ambheta Village Residential 93 35 8.0 13.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1235 <1.142 <1.0
4 AAQ02 19.03.17 Ambheta Village Residential 67 26 8.0 19.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5 AAQ02 28.03.17 Ambheta Village Residential 82 36 9.6 18.3 <10 <1.0 1.4 <1.0 1398 <1.142 <1.0
6 AAQ02 29.03.17 Ambheta Village Residential 75 32 8.0 22.5 <10 <1.0 1.3 <1.0
7 AAQ02 07.04.17 Ambheta Village Residential 62 28 8.0 19.1 <10 <1.0 1.2 <1.0 1255 <1.142 <1.0
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 297
S. No.
Station Code
Sampling Date
Sampling Location
Area/ Category
Average Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3 and VOC in ppm)
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX NH3 HBr HCl Cl2 HCs CO VOCs
8 AAQ02 08.04.17 Ambheta Village Residential 58 18 8.2 16.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9 AAQ02 17.04.17 Ambheta Village Residential 73 23 8.0 21.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1237 <1.142 <1.0
10 AAQ02 18.04.17 Ambheta Village Residential 84 27 8.0 21.2 <10 <1.0 1.6 <1.0
11 AAQ02 27.04.17 Ambheta Village Residential 77 25 8.0 17.2 <10 <1.0 1.1 <1.0 1501 <1.142 <1.0
12 AAQ02 28.04.17 Ambheta Village Residential 75 25 8.0 20.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
13 AAQ02 07.05.17 Ambheta Village Residential 92 31 8.8 17.7 <10 <1.0 1.4 <1.0 1252 <1.142 <1.0
14 AAQ02 08.05.17 Ambheta Village Residential 88 37 8.9 15.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
15 AAQ02 17.05.17 Ambheta Village Residential 107 47 8.0 19.7 <10 <1.0 1.4 <1.0 1310 <1.142 <1.0
16 AAQ02 18.05.17 Ambheta Village Residential 95 38 8.0 17.5 <10 <1.0 1.2 <1.0
17 AAQ02 27.05.17 Ambheta Village Residential 83 33 8.7 24.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1186 <1.142 <1.0
18 AAQ02 28.05.17 Ambheta Village Residential 78 30 8.8 18.4 <10 <1.0 1.0 <1.0
1 AAQ03 08.03.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 150 63 13.0 24.2 <10 <1.0 1.4 <1.0 1668 <1.142 <1.0
2 AAQ03 09.03.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 138 56 10.3 19.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3 AAQ03 18.03.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 98 42 9.0 27.9 <10 <1.0 1.3 <1.0 1510 <1.142 <1.0
4 AAQ03 19.03.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 86 38 15.3 21.4 <10 <1.0 1.6 <1.0
5 AAQ03 28.03.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 92 43 13.0 18.3 <10 <1.0 1.5 <1.0 1681 <1.142 <1.0
6 AAQ03 29.03.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 83 35 16.0 18.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7 AAQ03 07.04.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 76 28 10.7 21.9 <10 <1.0 1.6 <1.0 1518 <1.142 <1.0
8 AAQ03 08.04.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 117 53 11.2 19.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9 AAQ03 17.04.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 94 48 14.6 21.1 <10 <1.0 1.0 <1.0 1587 <1.142 <1.0
10 AAQ03 18.04.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 107 56 25.9 19.3 <10 <1.0 1.3 <1.0
11 AAQ03 27.04.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 116 52 10.8 17.0 <10 <1.0 1.0 <1.0 1435 <1.142 <1.0
12 AAQ03 28.04.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 83 47 15.3 19.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
13 AAQ03 07.05.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 78 33 16.5 18.5 <10 <1.0 1.2 <1.0 1498 <1.142 <1.0
14 AAQ03 08.05.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 92 38 19.2 21.7 <10 <1.0 1.3 <1.0
15 AAQ03 17.05.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 84 33 11.6 18.9 <10 <1.0 1.5 <1.0 1667 <1.142 <1.0
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 298
S. No.
Station Code
Sampling Date
Sampling Location
Area/ Category
Average Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3 and VOC in ppm)
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX NH3 HBr HCl Cl2 HCs CO VOCs
16 AAQ03 18.05.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 98 43 16.5 21.1 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
17 AAQ03 27.05.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 91 37 13.3 20.7 <10 <1.0 1.6 <1.0 1541 <1.142 <1.0
18 AAQ03 28.05.17 Lakhigam Village Residential 87 31 18.6 18.8 <10 <1.0 1.1 <1.0
1 AAQ04 01.03.17 Dahej Residential 78 28 8.0 31.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1310 <1.142 <1.0
2 AAQ04 10.03.17 Dahej Residential 117 35 8.9 24.1 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1432 <1.142 <1.0
3 AAQ04 11.03.17 Dahej Residential 73 27 8.0 22.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4 AAQ04 20.03.17 Dahej Residential 97 48 8.2 29.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1137 <1.142 <1.0
5 AAQ04 21.03.17 Dahej Residential 112 52 8.0 23.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6 AAQ04 30.03.17 Dahej Residential 83 37 8.0 19.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1252 <1.142 <1.0
7 AAQ04 31.03.17 Dahej Residential 85 35 8.0 21.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8 AAQ04 09.04.17 Dahej Residential 92 41 8.0 18.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1285 <1.142 <1.0
9 AAQ04 10.04.17 Dahej Residential 88 36 8.0 16.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10 AAQ04 19.04.17 Dahej Residential 74 21 8.4 17.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1353 <1.142 <1.0
11 AAQ04 20.04.17 Dahej Residential 82 32 8.0 21.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12 AAQ04 29.04.17 Dahej Residential 91 37 8.0 19.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1365 <1.142 <1.0
13 AAQ04 30.04.17 Dahej Residential 103 41 8.0 22.5 <10 <1.0 1.3 <1.0
14 AAQ04 09.05.17 Dahej Residential 73 32 9.2 20.5 <10 <1.0 1.0 <1.0 1321 <1.142 <1.0
15 AAQ04 10.05.17 Dahej Residential 81 35 9.4 22.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
16 AAQ04 19.05.17 Dahej Residential 95 38 8.8 29.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1427 <1.142 <1.0
17 AAQ04 20.05.17 Dahej Residential 98 41 8.0 19.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
18 AAQ04 29.05.17 Dahej Residential 126 47 8.6 23.1 <10 <1.0 1.6 <1.0 1396 <1.142 <1.0
19 AAQ04 30.05.17 Dahej Residential 84 34 8.0 19.2 <10 <1.0 1.5 <1.0
1 AAQ05 01.03.17 Suva Village Residential 84 28 9.5 18.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 992 <1.142 <1.0
2 AAQ05 10.03.17 Suva Village Residential 71 22 8.9 18.4 <10 <1.0 1.4 <1.0 1137 <1.142 <1.0
3 AAQ05 11.03.17 Suva Village Residential 107 37 8.0 17.7 <10 <1.0 1.8 <1.0
4 AAQ05 20.03.17 Suva Village Residential 91 32 8.0 16.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1245 <1.142 <1.0
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 299
S. No.
Station Code
Sampling Date
Sampling Location
Area/ Category
Average Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3 and VOC in ppm)
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX NH3 HBr HCl Cl2 HCs CO VOCs
5 AAQ05 21.03.17 Suva Village Residential 59 18 10.3 20.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6 AAQ05 30.03.17 Suva Village Residential 67 23 8.0 19.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1197 <1.142 <1.0
7 AAQ05 31.03.17 Suva Village Residential 62 25 8.0 18.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8 AAQ05 09.04.17 Suva Village Residential 58 21 8.0 19.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1305 <1.142 <1.0
9 AAQ05 10.04.17 Suva Village Residential 83 31 8.0 17.8 <10 <1.0 1.3 <1.0
10 AAQ05 19.04.17 Suva Village Residential 74 27 9.1 14.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1252 <1.142 <1.0
11 AAQ05 20.04.17 Suva Village Residential 65 22 8.0 19.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12 AAQ05 29.04.17 Suva Village Residential 72 25 8.0 18.1 <10 <1.0 1.1 <1.0 1080 <1.142 <1.0
13 AAQ05 30.04.17 Suva Village Residential 68 21 9.1 16.8 <10 <1.0 1.4 <1.0
14 AAQ05 09.05.17 Suva Village Residential 71 23 8.6 18.0 <10 <1.0 1.0 <1.0 1235 <1.142 <1.0
15 AAQ05 10.05.17 Suva Village Residential 88 28 8.5 19.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
16 AAQ05 19.05.17 Suva Village Residential 97 39 10.9 16.4 <10 <1.0 1.4 <1.0 1195 <1.142 <1.0
17 AAQ05 20.05.17 Suva Village Residential 92 33 8.0 16.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
18 AAQ05 29.05.17 Suva Village Residential 83 28 9.6 17.5 <10 <1.0 1.6 <1.0 1208 <1.142 <1.0
19 AAQ05 30.05.17 Suva Village Residential 65 21 8.6 15.0 <10 <1.0 1.3 <1.0
1 AAQ06 01.03.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 44 21 8.0 14.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1421 <1.142 <1.0
2 AAQ06 10.03.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 54 18 8.0 17.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1292 <1.0
3 AAQ06 11.03.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 71 26 9.2 17.2 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.142
4 AAQ06 20.03.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 63 21 8.0 23.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1510 <1.0
5 AAQ06 21.03.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 58 15 9.8 16.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.142
6 AAQ06 30.03.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 78 27 8.0 18.1 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1187 <1.0
7 AAQ06 31.03.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 56 25 8.0 17.1 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.142
8 AAQ06 09.04.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 61 21 8.0 17.1 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1310 <1.142 <1.0
9 AAQ06 10.04.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 71 29 8.9 20.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 300
S. No.
Station Code
Sampling Date
Sampling Location
Area/ Category
Average Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3 and VOC in ppm)
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX NH3 HBr HCl Cl2 HCs CO VOCs
10 AAQ06 19.04.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 87 31 8.0 13.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1292 <1.142 <1.0
11 AAQ06 20.04.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 90 35 8.0 13.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12 AAQ06 29.04.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 82 32 10.3 21.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1247 <1.142 <1.0
13 AAQ06 30.04.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 77 28 8.1 18.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
14 AAQ06 09.05.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 68 23 9.9 18.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1365 <1.142 <1.0
15 AAQ06 10.05.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 63 20 8.7 16.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
16 AAQ06 19.05.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 91 35 9.2 15.7 <10 <1.0 1.3 <1.0 1351 <1.142 <1.0
17 AAQ06 20.05.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 85 32 8.0 17.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
18 AAQ06 29.05.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 78 26 8.0 13.8 <10 <1.0 1.1 <1.0 1296 <1.142 <1.0
19 AAQ06 30.05.17 Expanded
Plymers Limited Industrial 81 28 8.0 14.3 <10 <1.0 1.0 <1.0
1 AAQ07 02.03.17 Vajapura Residential 57 29 8.0 18.6 <10 <1.0 1.2 <1.0 987 <1.142 <1.0
2 AAQ07 03.03.17 Vajapura Residential 52 24 8.0 13.5 <10 <1.0 2.0 <1.0
3 AAQ07 12.03.17 Vajapura Residential 47 27 8.0 10.8 <10 <1.0 1.2 <1.0 1156 <1.142 <1.0
4 AAQ07 13.03.17 Vajapura Residential 59 34 8.5 15.0 <10 <1.0 1.2 <1.0
5 AAQ07 22.03.17 Vajapura Residential 62 25 8.8 17.7 <10 <1.0 2.3 <1.0 1202 <1.142 <1.0
6 AAQ07 23.03.17 Vajapura Residential 68 21 8.3 14.5 <10 <1.0 1.9 <1.0
7 AAQ07 01.04.17 Vajapura Residential 65 23 9.7 14.0 <10 <1.0 1.9 <1.0 1056 <1.142 <1.0
8 AAQ07 02.04.17 Vajapura Residential 74 27 8.0 15.6 <10 <1.0 1.5 <1.0
9 AAQ07 11.04.17 Vajapura Residential 61 29 10.0 15.1 <10 <1.0 1.8 <1.0 1162 <1.142 <1.0
10 AAQ07 12.04.17 Vajapura Residential 68 24 10.0 16.9 <10 <1.0 2.9 <1.0
11 AAQ07 21.04.17 Vajapura Residential 65 21 8.0 12.1 <10 <1.0 2.2 <1.0 1134 <1.142 <1.0
12 AAQ07 22.04.17 Vajapura Residential 73 26 8.0 10.0 <10 <1.0 2.0 <1.0
13 AAQ07 01.05.17 Vajapura Residential 71 31 9.1 10.0 <10 <1.0 2.2 <1.0 1252 <1.142 <1.0
14 AAQ07 02.05.17 Vajapura Residential 74 25 9.9 16.2 <10 <1.0 3.5 <1.0
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 301
S. No.
Station Code
Sampling Date
Sampling Location
Area/ Category
Average Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3 and VOC in ppm)
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX NH3 HBr HCl Cl2 HCs CO VOCs
15 AAQ07 11.05.17 Vajapura Residential 65 22 8.0 11.0 <10 <1.0 1.6 <1.0 1123 <1.142 <1.0
16 AAQ07 12.05.17 Vajapura Residential 76 26 8.9 10.8 <10 <1.0 2.5 <1.0
17 AAQ07 21.05.17 Vajapura Residential 74 29 9.6 10.0 <10 <1.0 2.0 <1.0 1075 <1.142 <1.0
18 AAQ07 22.05.17 Vajapura Residential 65 23 10.1 10.1 <10 <1.0 2.5 <1.0
19 AAQ07 31.05.17 Vajapura Residential 62 20 10.6 10.0 <10 <1.0 3.1 <1.0 989 <1.142 <1.0
20 AAQ07 01.06.17 Vajapura Residential 58 18 9.8 10.0 <10 <1.0 2.6 <1.0
1 AAQ08 04.03.17 Vadadla Village Residential 82 31 8.0 19.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1141 <1.142 <1.0
2 AAQ08 05.03.17 Vadadla Village Residential 98 35 8.0 18.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3 AAQ08 14.03.17 Vadadla Village Residential 73 28 8.7 22.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1077 <1.142 <1.0
4 AAQ08 15.03.17 Vadadla Village Residential 87 32 8.0 24.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5 AAQ08 24.03.17 Vadadla Village Residential 85 35 8.0 21.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 972 <1.142 <1.0
6 AAQ08 25.03.17 Vadadla Village Residential 62 27 8.0 25.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7 AAQ08 03.04.17 Vadadla Village Residential 81 33 9.9 24.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1064 <1.142 <1.0
8 AAQ08 04.04.17 Vadadla Village Residential 74 31 8.0 17.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9 AAQ08 13.04.17 Vadadla Village Residential 63 25 8.1 19.6 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1048 <1.142 <1.0
10 AAQ08 14.04.17 Vadadla Village Residential 67 26 8.0 21.1 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11 AAQ08 23.04.17 Vadadla Village Residential 84 32 8.0 18.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1162 <1.142 <1.0
12 AAQ08 24.04.17 Vadadla Village Residential 98 38 8.0 15.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
13 AAQ08 03.05.17 Vadadla Village Residential 103 43 10.4 24.5 <10 <1.0 1.1 <1.0 989 <1.142 <1.0
14 AAQ08 04.05.17 Vadadla Village Residential 82 32 9.2 25.9 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
15 AAQ08 13.05.17 Vadadla Village Residential 87 35 8.0 22.3 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1052 <1.142 <1.0
16 AAQ08 14.05.17 Vadadla Village Residential 95 39 8.0 23.4 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
17 AAQ08 23.05.17 Vadadla Village Residential 63 28 8.3 21.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1164 <1.142 <1.0
18 AAQ08 24.05.17 Vadadla Village Residential 88 33 8.0 24.8 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
19 AAQ08 02.06.17 Vadadla Village Residential 74 31 8.0 25.7 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1078 <1.142 <1.0
20 AAQ08 03.06.17 Vadadla Village Residential 83 34 8.0 25.5 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 302
Annexure 14: Long-term climatological Table, Surat (Gujarat)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 303
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 304
Annexure 15: Dispersion Modeling Results
Table 1: Incremental GLC of Particulate Matter (PM10) from Flue Gas Stacks & Process Vent (fuel-Indian Coal)
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 1.24 0.88 0.50 0.28 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.09
20 1.22 0.98 0.55 0.31 0.21 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08
30 1.20 1.11 0.88 0.59 0.43 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.17 0.14 0.13 0.10
40 1.17 1.62 1.29 0.80 0.54 0.42 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.17
50 1.15 1.87 1.82 1.28 0.97 0.80 0.71 0.63 0.58 0.55 0.52 0.48 0.44 0.41 0.38
60 1.22 1.96 1.32 0.86 0.66 0.56 0.50 0.46 0.43 0.42 0.40 0.36 0.33 0.29 0.24
70 1.23 1.57 1.20 0.76 0.59 0.53 0.49 0.45 0.43 0.40 0.38 0.34 0.30 0.26 0.21
80 1.09 1.24 0.97 0.60 0.38 0.34 0.33 0.30 0.32 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.32 0.28
90 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.40 0.31 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.16
100 0.98 0.78 0.48 0.42 0.34 0.29 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.08
110 0.97 1.05 0.66 0.62 0.52 0.44 0.37 0.33 0.29 0.25 0.22 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.13
120 0.99 1.05 0.65 0.56 0.47 0.39 0.34 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.11
130 1.11 1.27 0.71 0.43 0.31 0.24 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.09
140 1.06 1.26 0.74 0.55 0.41 0.31 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14
150 1.19 1.30 0.78 0.49 0.40 0.35 0.31 0.28 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.09
160 1.16 1.41 0.79 0.52 0.43 0.43 0.41 0.39 0.36 0.34 0.31 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.18
170 1.00 1.34 0.79 0.50 0.34 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.18 0.15
180 0.91 0.97 0.75 0.52 0.37 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.18 0.14
190 0.91 0.59 0.45 0.52 0.54 0.53 0.50 0.47 0.44 0.41 0.38 0.34 0.30 0.27 0.22
200 0.91 0.55 0.42 0.40 0.41 0.39 0.36 0.33 0.30 0.27 0.25 0.22 0.19 0.16 0.13
210 0.92 0.51 0.38 0.43 0.47 0.48 0.47 0.45 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.33 0.30 0.27 0.22
220 0.93 0.51 0.50 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.65 0.62 0.59 0.56 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.38 0.31
230 0.94 0.52 0.49 0.54 0.53 0.49 0.45 0.41 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.27 0.23 0.21 0.17
240 0.95 0.52 0.39 0.37 0.33 0.28 0.25 0.22 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.07
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 305
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
250 0.97 0.54 0.41 0.40 0.35 0.28 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.07
260 0.98 0.65 0.43 0.45 0.42 0.37 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.16 0.13 0.11 0.08
270 1.00 0.73 0.41 0.34 0.28 0.24 0.20 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08
280 1.02 0.76 0.41 0.27 0.21 0.17 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06
290 1.04 0.73 0.39 0.25 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05
300 1.06 0.65 0.32 0.21 0.18 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05
310 1.09 0.81 0.33 0.22 0.16 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05
320 1.12 0.88 0.35 0.22 0.18 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04
330 1.16 0.84 0.36 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.04
340 1.19 0.72 0.38 0.23 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.07
350 1.21 0.70 0.35 0.24 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.07
360 1.24 0.76 0.46 0.25 0.22 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11
Table 2: Incremental GLC of Oxides of Sulphur (SO2) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Indian Coal)
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 0.042 0.029 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.006
20 0.042 0.031 0.017 0.011 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002
30 0.042 0.047 0.035 0.022 0.016 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004
40 0.049 0.062 0.049 0.035 0.026 0.021 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.005
50 0.070 0.091 0.087 0.063 0.049 0.040 0.033 0.030 0.029 0.027 0.025 0.022 0.020 0.018 0.015
60 0.082 0.099 0.078 0.052 0.036 0.027 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.009
70 0.083 0.075 0.056 0.038 0.028 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.006
80 0.080 0.077 0.051 0.030 0.024 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.009
90 0.066 0.059 0.031 0.022 0.016 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006
100 0.065 0.042 0.024 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004
110 0.062 0.048 0.030 0.022 0.017 0.014 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 306
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
120 0.055 0.053 0.037 0.026 0.019 0.015 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004
130 0.056 0.048 0.029 0.018 0.012 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.003
140 0.060 0.059 0.027 0.019 0.015 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.007
150 0.072 0.058 0.032 0.022 0.017 0.014 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006
160 0.068 0.067 0.041 0.029 0.023 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.005
170 0.063 0.060 0.029 0.019 0.016 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.004
180 0.057 0.059 0.031 0.018 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005
190 0.057 0.037 0.025 0.021 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.006
200 0.057 0.033 0.019 0.016 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005
210 0.055 0.031 0.020 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007
220 0.052 0.026 0.024 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.009
230 0.049 0.021 0.017 0.017 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005
240 0.047 0.024 0.018 0.013 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002
250 0.045 0.027 0.022 0.017 0.013 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002
260 0.044 0.029 0.027 0.022 0.017 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002
270 0.043 0.029 0.013 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002
280 0.040 0.027 0.013 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
290 0.038 0.024 0.011 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001
300 0.038 0.022 0.009 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001
310 0.037 0.025 0.010 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001
320 0.038 0.028 0.013 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001
330 0.039 0.028 0.015 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
340 0.041 0.025 0.013 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002
350 0.043 0.023 0.012 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003
360 0.044 0.027 0.015 0.009 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005
Table 3: Incremental GLC of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Indian Coal)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 307
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 0.057 0.032 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.013 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010
20 0.056 0.031 0.017 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.004
30 0.068 0.063 0.036 0.022 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005
40 0.085 0.070 0.050 0.041 0.033 0.026 0.022 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.006
50 0.122 0.127 0.109 0.091 0.073 0.059 0.049 0.047 0.044 0.041 0.038 0.033 0.029 0.025 0.020
60 0.156 0.169 0.113 0.073 0.050 0.037 0.034 0.031 0.028 0.025 0.023 0.019 0.016 0.014 0.011
70 0.157 0.123 0.069 0.050 0.039 0.031 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.008 0.007
80 0.148 0.124 0.075 0.055 0.045 0.036 0.030 0.025 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.007
90 0.125 0.102 0.063 0.044 0.032 0.024 0.020 0.017 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.005
100 0.111 0.056 0.031 0.028 0.027 0.024 0.021 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.006
110 0.101 0.068 0.040 0.025 0.024 0.021 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006
120 0.090 0.080 0.053 0.032 0.024 0.020 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004
130 0.089 0.087 0.046 0.027 0.017 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004
140 0.097 0.070 0.030 0.020 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.009
150 0.117 0.081 0.043 0.027 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010
160 0.114 0.104 0.066 0.043 0.030 0.023 0.018 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.006
170 0.102 0.086 0.045 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003
180 0.081 0.083 0.033 0.023 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007
190 0.082 0.062 0.035 0.023 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007
200 0.080 0.047 0.025 0.018 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.006
210 0.076 0.049 0.027 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.005
220 0.070 0.041 0.029 0.023 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.009
230 0.064 0.027 0.018 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004
240 0.065 0.031 0.029 0.017 0.011 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003
250 0.065 0.038 0.031 0.020 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002
260 0.060 0.033 0.038 0.027 0.018 0.013 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003
270 0.052 0.030 0.011 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 308
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
280 0.047 0.026 0.010 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
290 0.044 0.026 0.009 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
300 0.043 0.025 0.011 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
310 0.054 0.029 0.015 0.010 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001
320 0.057 0.037 0.015 0.009 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001
330 0.051 0.035 0.015 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.003
340 0.047 0.033 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002
350 0.059 0.040 0.018 0.013 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
360 0.063 0.039 0.017 0.009 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.008
Table 4: Incremental GLC of Particulate Matter (PM) from Flue Gas Stacks & Process Vent (fuel-Imported Coal)
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 1.189 0.847 0.483 0.265 0.180 0.152 0.138 0.128 0.121 0.115 0.109 0.105 0.100 0.091 0.082
20 1.173 0.938 0.527 0.300 0.198 0.155 0.129 0.115 0.104 0.095 0.092 0.091 0.090 0.087 0.079
30 1.147 1.064 0.848 0.568 0.417 0.338 0.287 0.252 0.228 0.208 0.190 0.160 0.138 0.121 0.095
40 1.123 1.557 1.234 0.764 0.517 0.407 0.355 0.323 0.301 0.283 0.266 0.239 0.214 0.193 0.162
50 1.100 1.794 1.746 1.227 0.931 0.772 0.677 0.608 0.561 0.526 0.499 0.461 0.426 0.396 0.360
60 1.169 1.878 1.266 0.823 0.634 0.534 0.477 0.440 0.417 0.402 0.384 0.348 0.313 0.279 0.227
70 1.180 1.505 1.152 0.727 0.568 0.505 0.468 0.436 0.410 0.386 0.364 0.324 0.286 0.253 0.203
80 1.048 1.185 0.929 0.573 0.369 0.328 0.313 0.292 0.308 0.326 0.334 0.334 0.321 0.303 0.264
90 0.960 0.958 0.570 0.383 0.301 0.249 0.216 0.197 0.198 0.200 0.205 0.206 0.196 0.181 0.157
100 0.941 0.750 0.462 0.400 0.327 0.280 0.246 0.216 0.192 0.170 0.151 0.122 0.105 0.093 0.078
110 0.927 1.012 0.629 0.592 0.502 0.421 0.359 0.312 0.274 0.241 0.214 0.173 0.154 0.144 0.128
120 0.951 1.008 0.621 0.540 0.450 0.378 0.327 0.292 0.265 0.241 0.222 0.186 0.158 0.136 0.104
130 1.072 1.224 0.678 0.417 0.297 0.231 0.198 0.191 0.181 0.168 0.155 0.132 0.113 0.098 0.091
140 1.014 1.214 0.710 0.527 0.390 0.297 0.233 0.212 0.197 0.187 0.179 0.167 0.157 0.148 0.134
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 309
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
150 1.139 1.243 0.752 0.470 0.388 0.338 0.299 0.264 0.236 0.210 0.189 0.155 0.129 0.110 0.091
160 1.116 1.356 0.755 0.495 0.413 0.409 0.396 0.372 0.347 0.322 0.299 0.260 0.230 0.206 0.171
170 0.959 1.283 0.762 0.481 0.328 0.249 0.234 0.227 0.222 0.217 0.211 0.199 0.185 0.169 0.142
180 0.870 0.929 0.724 0.496 0.356 0.319 0.297 0.275 0.255 0.237 0.221 0.203 0.185 0.168 0.139
190 0.871 0.566 0.428 0.498 0.519 0.508 0.482 0.452 0.421 0.392 0.366 0.322 0.286 0.257 0.212
200 0.875 0.523 0.403 0.387 0.391 0.371 0.343 0.314 0.287 0.263 0.242 0.207 0.180 0.158 0.128
210 0.881 0.489 0.364 0.411 0.451 0.460 0.450 0.430 0.406 0.382 0.360 0.319 0.286 0.258 0.215
220 0.889 0.493 0.476 0.603 0.652 0.651 0.627 0.595 0.563 0.534 0.507 0.455 0.406 0.364 0.300
230 0.900 0.498 0.468 0.521 0.506 0.469 0.429 0.391 0.356 0.326 0.299 0.256 0.223 0.197 0.159
240 0.912 0.503 0.370 0.354 0.312 0.271 0.236 0.207 0.184 0.164 0.148 0.122 0.104 0.089 0.069
250 0.927 0.521 0.394 0.386 0.334 0.271 0.221 0.187 0.166 0.151 0.140 0.122 0.104 0.091 0.071
260 0.943 0.622 0.409 0.433 0.399 0.352 0.308 0.268 0.235 0.207 0.184 0.149 0.124 0.106 0.080
270 0.960 0.698 0.394 0.330 0.270 0.226 0.194 0.168 0.147 0.131 0.118 0.105 0.095 0.086 0.073
280 0.979 0.728 0.397 0.261 0.199 0.163 0.139 0.123 0.111 0.101 0.094 0.082 0.073 0.066 0.055
290 0.998 0.700 0.370 0.240 0.181 0.147 0.125 0.109 0.098 0.089 0.082 0.071 0.062 0.055 0.046
300 1.017 0.626 0.310 0.198 0.169 0.140 0.117 0.099 0.084 0.073 0.067 0.062 0.058 0.054 0.048
310 1.041 0.780 0.317 0.208 0.156 0.118 0.099 0.086 0.075 0.067 0.063 0.057 0.055 0.053 0.048
320 1.075 0.842 0.336 0.209 0.172 0.138 0.111 0.097 0.087 0.078 0.070 0.057 0.048 0.042 0.034
330 1.111 0.802 0.344 0.216 0.167 0.136 0.116 0.101 0.096 0.088 0.081 0.070 0.061 0.054 0.043
340 1.139 0.690 0.362 0.223 0.173 0.143 0.122 0.107 0.097 0.090 0.084 0.073 0.064 0.062 0.065
350 1.163 0.668 0.336 0.232 0.183 0.155 0.138 0.128 0.122 0.116 0.111 0.100 0.090 0.082 0.067
360 1.185 0.729 0.442 0.244 0.207 0.184 0.160 0.146 0.141 0.139 0.136 0.131 0.125 0.117 0.102
Table 5: Incremental GLC of Oxides of Sulphur (SO2) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Imported Coal)
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 0.163 0.114 0.063 0.034 0.024 0.020 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.017 0.018 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.014
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 310
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
20 0.159 0.126 0.069 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.010
30 0.155 0.148 0.121 0.080 0.058 0.046 0.039 0.034 0.030 0.028 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.016 0.012
40 0.152 0.215 0.174 0.113 0.078 0.061 0.053 0.047 0.044 0.041 0.038 0.033 0.030 0.027 0.022
50 0.157 0.256 0.264 0.187 0.141 0.116 0.100 0.088 0.080 0.074 0.070 0.063 0.058 0.054 0.049
60 0.170 0.273 0.194 0.133 0.096 0.077 0.067 0.061 0.057 0.055 0.052 0.046 0.041 0.037 0.030
70 0.178 0.215 0.166 0.111 0.085 0.074 0.066 0.061 0.056 0.053 0.049 0.043 0.038 0.033 0.026
80 0.168 0.169 0.127 0.079 0.057 0.049 0.045 0.046 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.047 0.044 0.041 0.035
90 0.144 0.139 0.081 0.055 0.044 0.036 0.031 0.028 0.027 0.028 0.028 0.028 0.027 0.025 0.021
100 0.135 0.116 0.069 0.056 0.045 0.038 0.033 0.029 0.025 0.022 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.012
110 0.134 0.150 0.094 0.082 0.068 0.056 0.048 0.041 0.036 0.032 0.028 0.024 0.023 0.021 0.018
120 0.134 0.154 0.092 0.081 0.065 0.053 0.046 0.040 0.036 0.032 0.030 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.014
130 0.153 0.170 0.090 0.055 0.040 0.031 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.021 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012
140 0.159 0.180 0.099 0.073 0.055 0.042 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.031 0.030 0.027 0.025 0.024 0.021
150 0.175 0.181 0.102 0.067 0.056 0.048 0.042 0.036 0.032 0.028 0.025 0.021 0.017 0.015 0.012
160 0.180 0.198 0.107 0.070 0.065 0.061 0.057 0.052 0.048 0.044 0.041 0.035 0.031 0.027 0.023
170 0.158 0.190 0.105 0.065 0.043 0.036 0.032 0.031 0.030 0.029 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.019
180 0.145 0.153 0.104 0.068 0.048 0.043 0.039 0.036 0.034 0.031 0.029 0.027 0.024 0.022 0.018
190 0.145 0.093 0.067 0.072 0.072 0.069 0.065 0.060 0.056 0.052 0.049 0.043 0.038 0.034 0.028
200 0.145 0.086 0.058 0.055 0.053 0.050 0.046 0.041 0.038 0.035 0.032 0.027 0.024 0.021 0.017
210 0.144 0.076 0.055 0.059 0.062 0.062 0.061 0.058 0.054 0.051 0.048 0.042 0.038 0.034 0.029
220 0.142 0.069 0.072 0.085 0.089 0.088 0.084 0.080 0.075 0.071 0.067 0.060 0.054 0.048 0.040
230 0.140 0.069 0.065 0.070 0.067 0.062 0.056 0.051 0.046 0.042 0.039 0.033 0.029 0.026 0.021
240 0.139 0.069 0.052 0.046 0.041 0.035 0.031 0.027 0.024 0.021 0.019 0.016 0.013 0.012 0.009
250 0.138 0.079 0.057 0.057 0.047 0.037 0.030 0.025 0.022 0.020 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.009
260 0.137 0.092 0.068 0.065 0.057 0.049 0.042 0.036 0.032 0.028 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.014 0.011
270 0.137 0.100 0.053 0.043 0.035 0.029 0.025 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.010
280 0.138 0.101 0.053 0.035 0.026 0.021 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.007
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 311
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
290 0.140 0.095 0.049 0.032 0.024 0.019 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006
300 0.141 0.085 0.041 0.027 0.022 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.006
310 0.143 0.105 0.042 0.028 0.020 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.006
320 0.147 0.112 0.044 0.028 0.022 0.018 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.004
330 0.151 0.106 0.049 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006
340 0.156 0.092 0.050 0.029 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009
350 0.161 0.090 0.045 0.031 0.024 0.020 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.009
360 0.164 0.101 0.058 0.034 0.028 0.025 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.019 0.018 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.014
Table 6: Incremental GLC of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Imported Coal)
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 0.059 0.037 0.016 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.015 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.010
20 0.061 0.038 0.022 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004
30 0.072 0.072 0.045 0.028 0.019 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006
40 0.087 0.082 0.063 0.049 0.038 0.030 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.007
50 0.127 0.142 0.125 0.101 0.080 0.065 0.053 0.051 0.048 0.045 0.041 0.036 0.032 0.028 0.023
60 0.159 0.178 0.125 0.081 0.056 0.041 0.037 0.034 0.030 0.027 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.016 0.013
70 0.158 0.126 0.081 0.055 0.042 0.034 0.028 0.023 0.020 0.017 0.016 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008
80 0.152 0.132 0.083 0.055 0.045 0.038 0.032 0.028 0.025 0.022 0.020 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.009
90 0.127 0.107 0.064 0.044 0.033 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007
100 0.113 0.064 0.036 0.029 0.028 0.025 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.014 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.006
110 0.107 0.070 0.044 0.028 0.024 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007
120 0.095 0.083 0.059 0.038 0.026 0.020 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005
130 0.095 0.089 0.050 0.029 0.019 0.014 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004
140 0.103 0.083 0.034 0.023 0.020 0.019 0.019 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.011
150 0.125 0.091 0.049 0.031 0.023 0.018 0.017 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 312
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
160 0.119 0.109 0.070 0.047 0.034 0.027 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.006
170 0.109 0.092 0.049 0.033 0.025 0.019 0.016 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005
180 0.090 0.093 0.040 0.025 0.019 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008
190 0.091 0.066 0.039 0.028 0.023 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007
200 0.089 0.052 0.028 0.022 0.024 0.024 0.022 0.020 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.007
210 0.085 0.053 0.031 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.007
220 0.079 0.044 0.034 0.030 0.027 0.025 0.024 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.010
230 0.073 0.031 0.021 0.018 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.004
240 0.071 0.036 0.030 0.019 0.013 0.010 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.003
250 0.072 0.040 0.035 0.024 0.016 0.011 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002
260 0.068 0.040 0.042 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.013 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.003
270 0.061 0.038 0.015 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002
280 0.053 0.034 0.014 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001
290 0.048 0.029 0.012 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001
300 0.048 0.028 0.012 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001
310 0.056 0.033 0.016 0.010 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001
320 0.059 0.042 0.018 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001
330 0.053 0.040 0.019 0.011 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003
340 0.048 0.034 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003
350 0.060 0.042 0.019 0.013 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003
360 0.064 0.043 0.020 0.012 0.012 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.009
Table 7: Incremental GLC of Particulate Matters (PM) from Flue Gas Stacks & Process Vent (fuel-Imported Coal + Lignite)
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 2.79 2.00 1.14 0.63 0.42 0.36 0.32 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.19
20 2.76 2.21 1.24 0.71 0.47 0.36 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 313
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
30 2.70 2.50 2.00 1.34 0.98 0.80 0.68 0.59 0.54 0.49 0.45 0.38 0.33 0.28 0.22
40 2.64 3.67 2.90 1.79 1.21 0.96 0.83 0.76 0.71 0.67 0.63 0.56 0.50 0.46 0.38
50 2.58 4.21 4.10 2.88 2.19 1.81 1.59 1.43 1.32 1.24 1.18 1.09 1.00 0.93 0.85
60 2.73 4.40 2.97 1.93 1.49 1.25 1.12 1.03 0.98 0.94 0.90 0.82 0.74 0.66 0.53
70 2.75 3.54 2.71 1.71 1.33 1.19 1.10 1.03 0.96 0.91 0.86 0.76 0.67 0.60 0.48
80 2.43 2.78 2.18 1.35 0.87 0.77 0.74 0.69 0.72 0.77 0.78 0.79 0.76 0.71 0.62
90 2.26 2.25 1.34 0.90 0.70 0.58 0.50 0.46 0.47 0.47 0.48 0.48 0.46 0.43 0.37
100 2.21 1.75 1.08 0.94 0.77 0.66 0.58 0.51 0.45 0.40 0.36 0.29 0.24 0.22 0.18
110 2.17 2.37 1.48 1.39 1.18 0.99 0.85 0.74 0.65 0.57 0.51 0.41 0.36 0.34 0.30
120 2.22 2.36 1.46 1.27 1.06 0.89 0.77 0.69 0.62 0.57 0.52 0.44 0.37 0.32 0.25
130 2.49 2.86 1.59 0.97 0.69 0.54 0.47 0.45 0.43 0.40 0.37 0.31 0.27 0.23 0.21
140 2.37 2.83 1.66 1.24 0.92 0.70 0.55 0.50 0.46 0.44 0.42 0.39 0.37 0.35 0.31
150 2.66 2.92 1.77 1.10 0.91 0.80 0.70 0.62 0.56 0.50 0.44 0.36 0.30 0.26 0.21
160 2.60 3.19 1.78 1.16 0.97 0.96 0.93 0.88 0.82 0.76 0.70 0.61 0.54 0.49 0.40
170 2.24 3.01 1.79 1.13 0.77 0.59 0.55 0.53 0.52 0.51 0.50 0.47 0.44 0.40 0.34
180 2.04 2.17 1.70 1.17 0.84 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.56 0.52 0.48 0.44 0.40 0.33
190 2.04 1.33 1.01 1.17 1.22 1.20 1.14 1.07 0.99 0.92 0.86 0.76 0.67 0.61 0.50
200 2.05 1.22 0.95 0.91 0.92 0.87 0.81 0.74 0.68 0.62 0.57 0.49 0.42 0.37 0.30
210 2.06 1.15 0.86 0.97 1.06 1.08 1.06 1.01 0.96 0.90 0.85 0.75 0.67 0.61 0.51
220 2.09 1.16 1.12 1.42 1.54 1.53 1.48 1.40 1.33 1.26 1.19 1.07 0.96 0.86 0.71
230 2.11 1.17 1.10 1.23 1.19 1.11 1.01 0.92 0.84 0.77 0.71 0.60 0.53 0.46 0.37
240 2.14 1.19 0.87 0.83 0.74 0.64 0.56 0.49 0.43 0.39 0.35 0.29 0.24 0.21 0.16
250 2.18 1.22 0.93 0.91 0.79 0.64 0.52 0.44 0.39 0.36 0.33 0.29 0.25 0.21 0.17
260 2.22 1.46 0.96 1.02 0.94 0.83 0.72 0.63 0.55 0.49 0.43 0.35 0.29 0.25 0.19
270 2.26 1.64 0.93 0.78 0.64 0.53 0.46 0.40 0.35 0.31 0.28 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.17
280 2.30 1.71 0.94 0.62 0.47 0.38 0.33 0.29 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13
290 2.35 1.65 0.87 0.57 0.43 0.35 0.29 0.26 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.11
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 314
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
300 2.39 1.47 0.73 0.47 0.40 0.33 0.28 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.11
310 2.45 1.84 0.75 0.49 0.37 0.28 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.11
320 2.53 1.98 0.79 0.49 0.41 0.33 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.08
330 2.62 1.89 0.81 0.50 0.39 0.32 0.27 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.10
340 2.68 1.63 0.85 0.52 0.41 0.34 0.29 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.15
350 2.74 1.57 0.79 0.55 0.43 0.36 0.32 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.16
360 2.78 1.72 1.04 0.58 0.49 0.43 0.38 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.28 0.24
Table 8: Incremental GLC of Oxides of Sulphur (SO2) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Imported Coal + Lignite)
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 0.60 0.43 0.24 0.13 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04
20 0.59 0.47 0.26 0.15 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04
30 0.58 0.54 0.43 0.29 0.21 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05
40 0.57 0.79 0.63 0.39 0.27 0.21 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.08
50 0.56 0.91 0.91 0.64 0.48 0.40 0.35 0.31 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.18
60 0.60 0.96 0.65 0.43 0.33 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.11
70 0.61 0.77 0.58 0.38 0.29 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.10
80 0.55 0.60 0.47 0.29 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.13
90 0.49 0.49 0.29 0.20 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08
100 0.48 0.39 0.24 0.20 0.17 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04
110 0.48 0.52 0.33 0.30 0.25 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.07
120 0.48 0.52 0.32 0.28 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05
130 0.54 0.62 0.34 0.21 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05
140 0.52 0.62 0.36 0.27 0.20 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07
150 0.59 0.64 0.38 0.24 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05
160 0.59 0.70 0.39 0.25 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.09
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 315
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
170 0.51 0.66 0.39 0.24 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.07
180 0.46 0.49 0.37 0.25 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07
190 0.46 0.30 0.22 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.11
200 0.47 0.28 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06
210 0.47 0.25 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.11
220 0.47 0.25 0.25 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.15
230 0.47 0.25 0.24 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.08
240 0.48 0.26 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03
250 0.48 0.27 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.14 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04
260 0.49 0.32 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04
270 0.49 0.36 0.20 0.17 0.14 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04
280 0.50 0.37 0.20 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03
290 0.51 0.35 0.19 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02
300 0.52 0.32 0.16 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02
310 0.53 0.39 0.16 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02
320 0.55 0.42 0.17 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02
330 0.56 0.40 0.18 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02
340 0.58 0.35 0.18 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03
350 0.59 0.34 0.17 0.12 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03
360 0.60 0.37 0.22 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05
Table 9: Incremental GLC of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Imported Coal + Lignite)
DIRECTION DISTAANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 0.066 0.045 0.021 0.014 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.011
20 0.071 0.049 0.027 0.017 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 316
DIRECTION DISTAANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
30 0.076 0.082 0.056 0.035 0.024 0.018 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.006
40 0.090 0.101 0.078 0.059 0.045 0.035 0.029 0.024 0.021 0.019 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.009
50 0.133 0.161 0.147 0.113 0.089 0.071 0.059 0.056 0.052 0.049 0.046 0.040 0.036 0.032 0.026
60 0.162 0.188 0.140 0.091 0.063 0.047 0.040 0.036 0.032 0.029 0.027 0.024 0.021 0.019 0.015
70 0.162 0.136 0.095 0.064 0.046 0.037 0.030 0.026 0.023 0.020 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.009
80 0.156 0.142 0.091 0.055 0.046 0.040 0.035 0.031 0.029 0.026 0.024 0.021 0.018 0.016 0.013
90 0.130 0.113 0.064 0.044 0.033 0.025 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009
100 0.120 0.073 0.041 0.030 0.029 0.026 0.023 0.020 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.007
110 0.115 0.081 0.051 0.034 0.026 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.008
120 0.103 0.090 0.065 0.044 0.032 0.024 0.019 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006
130 0.104 0.093 0.054 0.032 0.021 0.016 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.005
140 0.110 0.098 0.043 0.030 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.022 0.022 0.022 0.021 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.012
150 0.135 0.102 0.055 0.037 0.028 0.022 0.018 0.017 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.012 0.011
160 0.124 0.116 0.075 0.052 0.040 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.020 0.018 0.016 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.007
170 0.117 0.103 0.053 0.036 0.028 0.022 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.006
180 0.101 0.104 0.049 0.028 0.021 0.017 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009
190 0.102 0.070 0.044 0.034 0.029 0.026 0.023 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.009
200 0.100 0.059 0.033 0.026 0.029 0.028 0.026 0.023 0.021 0.019 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.008
210 0.096 0.057 0.035 0.029 0.026 0.025 0.023 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.010
220 0.091 0.048 0.040 0.037 0.035 0.033 0.031 0.029 0.027 0.025 0.023 0.020 0.018 0.016 0.013
230 0.085 0.036 0.027 0.025 0.022 0.020 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.006
240 0.079 0.041 0.033 0.021 0.015 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004
250 0.080 0.046 0.039 0.029 0.020 0.015 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003
260 0.077 0.048 0.047 0.037 0.027 0.021 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.003
270 0.072 0.047 0.020 0.014 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003
280 0.065 0.043 0.019 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002
290 0.060 0.037 0.017 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 317
DIRECTION DISTAANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
300 0.059 0.033 0.014 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002
310 0.058 0.038 0.017 0.011 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002
320 0.061 0.048 0.021 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001
330 0.059 0.047 0.023 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003
340 0.063 0.040 0.020 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004
350 0.067 0.044 0.021 0.013 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004
360 0.069 0.048 0.024 0.015 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009
Table 10: Incremental GLC of HC (in μg/m3) from Process Vents
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
10 0.395 0.234 0.122 0.105 0.097 0.091 0.085 0.079 0.074 0.070 0.067 0.065 0.065 0.065 0.064
20 0.398 0.258 0.118 0.102 0.088 0.076 0.066 0.059 0.057 0.054 0.051 0.045 0.043 0.040 0.035
30 0.401 0.292 0.224 0.180 0.140 0.110 0.093 0.087 0.080 0.073 0.066 0.056 0.047 0.041 0.036
40 0.403 0.363 0.264 0.227 0.193 0.163 0.144 0.133 0.124 0.115 0.106 0.091 0.085 0.079 0.068
50 0.424 0.528 0.463 0.411 0.369 0.335 0.314 0.296 0.278 0.257 0.238 0.205 0.177 0.154 0.133
60 0.454 0.601 0.464 0.375 0.303 0.251 0.219 0.193 0.184 0.172 0.162 0.144 0.130 0.118 0.101
70 0.438 0.608 0.400 0.380 0.319 0.261 0.226 0.200 0.177 0.157 0.141 0.116 0.096 0.081 0.060
80 0.464 0.508 0.397 0.336 0.321 0.298 0.264 0.234 0.208 0.186 0.168 0.140 0.118 0.101 0.081
90 0.474 0.453 0.228 0.184 0.198 0.194 0.175 0.156 0.139 0.126 0.115 0.099 0.086 0.077 0.063
100 0.486 0.393 0.199 0.158 0.127 0.117 0.100 0.086 0.079 0.078 0.076 0.070 0.062 0.057 0.050
110 0.499 0.322 0.258 0.218 0.163 0.124 0.118 0.109 0.100 0.092 0.084 0.075 0.068 0.063 0.060
120 0.516 0.347 0.313 0.274 0.212 0.164 0.130 0.108 0.104 0.099 0.093 0.081 0.070 0.061 0.048
130 0.539 0.408 0.217 0.161 0.135 0.110 0.090 0.074 0.068 0.062 0.056 0.047 0.040 0.036 0.030
140 0.560 0.542 0.303 0.181 0.133 0.112 0.103 0.102 0.104 0.104 0.106 0.109 0.110 0.106 0.092
150 0.578 0.515 0.267 0.208 0.154 0.118 0.095 0.078 0.074 0.080 0.084 0.091 0.094 0.093 0.082
160 0.591 0.482 0.302 0.278 0.224 0.184 0.156 0.136 0.120 0.106 0.095 0.077 0.064 0.054 0.041
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 318
DIRECTION DISTANCE (METERS)
(DEGREES) 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 10000
170 0.598 0.435 0.269 0.165 0.134 0.125 0.114 0.100 0.088 0.078 0.070 0.056 0.050 0.045 0.037
180 0.600 0.392 0.293 0.178 0.131 0.107 0.092 0.081 0.073 0.066 0.060 0.051 0.044 0.039 0.034
190 0.595 0.555 0.368 0.260 0.210 0.175 0.150 0.132 0.117 0.106 0.097 0.083 0.072 0.064 0.052
200 3.512 0.845 0.328 0.231 0.180 0.149 0.127 0.111 0.099 0.089 0.081 0.069 0.060 0.053 0.042
210 2.868 3.324 1.434 0.953 0.715 0.568 0.470 0.399 0.346 0.304 0.271 0.221 0.185 0.159 0.122
220 0.550 0.511 0.532 0.446 0.363 0.303 0.259 0.225 0.200 0.179 0.162 0.137 0.119 0.105 0.085
230 0.528 0.252 0.230 0.182 0.146 0.122 0.104 0.091 0.081 0.073 0.066 0.056 0.049 0.043 0.035
240 0.504 0.292 0.140 0.131 0.111 0.085 0.064 0.050 0.041 0.034 0.031 0.025 0.023 0.022 0.020
250 0.480 0.330 0.131 0.160 0.138 0.108 0.085 0.068 0.056 0.047 0.041 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.016
260 0.457 0.343 0.193 0.223 0.192 0.153 0.121 0.096 0.078 0.065 0.055 0.042 0.033 0.027 0.020
270 0.435 0.329 0.140 0.079 0.065 0.052 0.042 0.036 0.033 0.030 0.028 0.024 0.021 0.019 0.016
280 0.416 0.294 0.128 0.072 0.049 0.038 0.031 0.026 0.023 0.020 0.019 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.010
290 0.404 0.244 0.107 0.061 0.041 0.032 0.026 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.008
300 0.398 0.200 0.111 0.067 0.044 0.034 0.030 0.026 0.023 0.020 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010
310 0.394 0.208 0.091 0.082 0.068 0.056 0.046 0.039 0.033 0.029 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.015 0.012
320 0.390 0.205 0.119 0.084 0.067 0.054 0.044 0.037 0.031 0.027 0.023 0.018 0.014 0.012 0.009
330 0.387 0.195 0.141 0.098 0.070 0.052 0.041 0.033 0.028 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.019
340 0.385 0.184 0.103 0.079 0.069 0.059 0.051 0.050 0.049 0.048 0.047 0.041 0.036 0.032 0.026
350 0.387 0.191 0.142 0.107 0.091 0.079 0.068 0.058 0.051 0.044 0.039 0.031 0.025 0.021 0.021
360 0.391 0.202 0.154 0.106 0.085 0.071 0.063 0.060 0.058 0.057 0.056 0.055 0.053 0.052 0.049
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 319
Figure 1: Isopleth for Incremental GLC of Particulate Matter (PM10) from Flue Gas Stacks & Process Vents (fuel-Indian Coal)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 320
Figure 2: Isopleth for Incremental GLC of Oxides of Sulphur (SO2) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Indian Coal)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 321
Figure 3: Isopleth for Incremental GLC of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Indian Coal)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 322
Figure 4: Isopleth for Incremental GLC of Particulate Matters (PM) from Flue Gas Stacks & Process Vent (fuel-Imported Coal)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 323
Figure 5: Isopleth for Incremental GLC of Oxides of Sulphur (SO2) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Imported Coal)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 324
Figure 6: Isopleth for Incremental GLC of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Imported Coal)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 325
Figure 7: Isopleth for Incremental GLC of Particulate Matters (PM) from Flue Gas Stacks & Process Vent (fuel-Imported Coal + Lignite)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 326
Figure 8: Isopleth for Incremental GLC of Oxides of Sulphur (SO2) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Imported Coal + Lignite)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 327
Figure 9: Isopleth for Incremental GLC of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) from Flue Gas Stacks (fuel-Imported Coal + Lignite)
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 328
Figure 10: Isopleth for incremental GLC (in μg/m3) of HC from Process Vents
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 329
Annexure 16: Compliance of Consent to Establish
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 330
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 331
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 332
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 333
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 334
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 335
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 336
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 337
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 338
Annexure 17: Layout of Fire Water Network
Annexure 18: Map showing Gas Detectors Location
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 339
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 340
Annexure 19: Undertaking of Project Proponent on the Ownership of the Report
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 341
Annexure 20: Existing EC Compliance
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 342
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 343
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 344
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 345
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 346
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 347
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 348
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 349
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 350
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 351
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 352
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 353
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 354
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 355
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 356
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 357
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 358
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 359
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 360
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 361
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 362
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 363
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 364
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 365
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 366
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 367
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 368
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 369
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 370
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 371
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 372
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 373
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 374
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 375
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 376
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 377
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 378
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 379
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 380
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 381
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 382
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 383
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 384
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 385
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 386
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 387
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 388
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 389
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 390
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 391
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 392
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 393
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 394
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 395
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 396
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 397
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 398
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 399
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 400
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 401
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 402
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 403
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 404
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 405
Annexure 21: Certificate of Accreditation Issued by the NABET, QCI
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 406
Annexure 22: Application of Certified Compliance Report to MOEFCC, Bhopal
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 407
Annexure 23: Agreement with Cement Manufacturing Unit
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 408
Annexure 24: Equipment List of Various Process
Equipment of Phenol
Exchangers Pump
Primary Stripper Reboiler OWS pit transfer pump
Primary Stripper Condenser Recycle Cumene Caustic Wash Pumps
Secondary Stripper Reboiler Air Scrubber Circulation Pumps
Secondary Stripper Condenser Oxidizer Feed Pumps
Cleavage Reactor Condenser Oxidizer - 1 Circulation Pumps
Crude Acetone Column Feed Heater Oxidizer - 4 Circulation Pumps
Acetone Product Column Condenser CHP Drain Drum Pump
Hydrocarbon Removal Column Condenser Secondary Stripper Bottoms Pumps
Hydrocarbon Removal Column Side Reboiler/Steam Flash Acetone Drum Pumps
Hydrocarbon Removal Column Side Reboiler/PFC Cleavage Product Pumps
Oxidation Unit Vent Chiller Flash Acetone Condensate Pumps
Oxidizer Feed Circulation cooler Neutralizer Circulation Pumps
AMS Topping Column Reboiler Neutralizer Wash Drum Circulation Pump
Oxidizer Feed Preheater Crude Acetone Column Feed Pumps
Oxidizer 1 Cooler Phenol Drain Drum Pumps
Oxidizer Overhead Vapour Cooler Recovery Surge Tank Pumps
Spent Air Chiller Crude Acetone Column Bottoms Pumps
Spent Air Exchanger Crude Acetone Column Reflux Pumps
Adsorber Regeneration Condenser Acetone Product Column Reflux Pumps
Flash Acetone Recycle Cooler Light Hydrocarbon Purge Pump
Cleavage Circulation Cooler Acetone Product Column Bottoms Pumps
Neutralizer Trim Cooler Acetone Product Transfer Pumps
Oxidizer 4 Cooler Crude Phenol Column Reflux Pumps
Crude Acetone Column Reboiler Crude Phenol Column Bottoms Pumps
Crude Acetone Column Condenser Hydrocarbon Removal Column Bottoms Pumps
Acetone Product Column Reboiler/HRC Overhead Hydrocarbon Removal Column Reflux Pumps
Acetone Product Column Reboiler Phenol Water Pumps
Concentrated CHP Cooler Hydrocarbon Removal Column Side Reboiler Pumps
Second Stage Cleavage Reactor Phenol Finishing Column Bottoms Pumps
Crude Phenol Column Reboiler Phenol Finishing Column Reflux Pumps
Fractionation Startup Cooler Phenol Product Pumps
Acetone Product Column Vent Chiller Phenol Product Transfer Pumps
Hydrocarbon Removal Column Reboiler Hydrated Phenol Transfer Pumps
Acetone Product Column Bottoms Cooler Caustic Wash Circulation Pumps
Acetone Product Cooler AMS Water Wash Circulation Pump
Phenol Finishing Column Reboiler AMS Topping Column Feed Pumps
Acetone Stripper Bottoms Cooler AMS Topping Column Bottoms Pumps
Crude Phenol Column Condenser AMS Topping Column Reflux Pumps
AMS Topping Column Condenser AMS Tailing Column Bottoms Pumps
AMS Tailing Column Reboiler AMS Tailing Column Reflux Pumps
Hydrocarbon Removal Column Overhead Trim Cooler AMS Hydrogenation Reactor Feed Pumps
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 409
Equipment of Phenol
MHP Decomposer AMS Hydrogenation Reactor Product Pumps
MHP Decomposer Product Cooler AMS Product Column Bottoms Pumps
Hydrocarbon Removal Column Side Reboiler/CPC AMS Product Column Reflux Pumps
Phenol Purification Feed/Effluent Exchanger AMS Product Transfer Pumps
Phenol Purification Feed Cooler Recovery Column Bottoms Pumps
Phenol Finishing Column Condenser Dephenolation Feed Pumps
Phenol Product Cooler Dephenolation Solvent Pumps
Stripper Area Vent Chiller First Stage Solvent Regen Aqueous Pumps
Cleavage Reactor Vent Chiller Second Stage Solvent Regn Aqueous Pump
AMS Topping Column Feed Preaheater Aqueous Dephenolation Circulation Pump
AMS Hydrogenation Reactor Feed Cooler Relief Scrubber Pump
AMS Hydrogenation Reactor Vent Condenser Caustic 30%wt pump
AMS Product Cooler Sulphuric Acid Pump
AMS Hydrogenation Product Cooler Hot Condensate Transfer Pumps
Recovery Column Reboiler Tempered Water Pumps
Vent Chiller R&D Emergency Quench Water Pumps
AMS Tailing Column Condenser Vessels
AMS Product Column Reboiler Recycle Cumene Wash Drum
AMS Product Column Condenser Oxidizer Relief Drum
MHP Vent Condenser Spent Air Separator
Atmospheric flash condenser Adsorber Knockout Drum
Columns Adsorber Condensate Separator
Recovery Column Oxidate Degasser
Crude Acetone Column CHP Drain Drum
Acetone Product Column CHP Receiving Drum
Crude Phenol Column Flash Acetone Recycle Drum
Hydrocarbon Removal Column Sulfuric Acid Head Drum
Phenol Finishing Column Neutralizer
AMS Topping Column Neutralizer Wash Drum
Air Scrubber Phenol Drain Drum
AMS Product Column Crude Acetone Column Reflux Drum
AMS Tailing Column Acetone Product Column Reflux Drum
Acetone Stripper Crude Phenol Column Reflux Drum
Extraction Column Hydrocarbon Removal Column Reflux Drum
Vent Scrubber Phenolic Water Drum
Primary Stripper Phenol Finishing Column Reflux Drum
Secondary Stripper Acetone Product Column Bottoms Separator
Vessels Crude AMS Caustic Wash Drum
LP Steam Flash Drum AMS Topping Column Reflux Drum
Atmospheric Flash Drum AMS Tailing Column Reflux Drum
CAC Reboiler Condensate Pot AMS Hydrogenation Reactor Knockout Drum
CPC Reboiler Condensate Pot AMS Hydrogenation Relief Drum
HRC Reboiler Condensate Pot AMS Product Column Reflux Drum
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 410
Equipment of Phenol
HRC Side Reboiler Condensate Pot Dephenolation Solvent Drum
PFC Reboiler Condensate Pot Solvent Regeneration Drum
AMS Tailing Column Condensate Pot 30 WT % Caustic Storage Drum
AMS Product Column Condensate Pot Sulfuric Acid Storage Drum
Recovery Column
Equipment list for Cumene
Exchangers Columns
Propylene Feed Column Condenser (Phase-1) /Propylene Rerun Column Condenser (Phase-2)
PROPYLENE FEED COLUMN (PHASE 1)/ DEETHANIZER (PHASE 2)
Propylene Feed Column Reboiler (Phase-1) / Deethanizer Reboiler (Phase-2)
PROPYLENE RERUN COLUMN
Propylene Feed Column Steam Reboiler (Phase-1) /Propylene rerun Column Steam Reboiler (Phase-2)
DEPROPANIZER
Propylene Feed Column Bottoms Cooler (Phase-1) /Propylene Rerun Column Bottoms Cooler (Phase-2)
BENZENE COLUMN
Propylene Feed Column Vent Condenser (Phase-1) / Deethanizer Vent Condenser (Phase-2)
CUMENE COLUMN
Propylene Feed Guard Beds Cooler PIPB COLUMN
Deethanizer Condenser Vessels
Propylene Rerun Column Reboiler Propylene Feed Column Receiver (Phase-1)
/ Deethanizer Receiver (Phase-2)
Alkylation Reactor Feed Heater Propylene Feed Surge Drum (Phase-1) /
Propylene Rerun Column Receiver(Phase-2)
Recycle Benzene-Reactor Effluent Recycle Exchanger Propylene Feed Guard Beds
(Nitrogen/Sulfur)
Depropanizer Feed-Bottoms Exchanger Propylene Feed Guard Bed (Arsine)
Depropanizer Condenser Depropanizer Receiver
Depropanizer Reboiler Water Break Drum
Transalkylation Reactor Feed Exchanger Benzene Feed Guard Beds (Clay)
Benzene Feed Guard Beds Exchanger Benzene Feed Guard Beds (NiGuard)
Benzene Feed Guard Beds Heater Benzene Column Receiver
Benzene Column Condenser Cumene Column Receiver
Benzene Column Drag Cooler PIPB Column Receiver
Benzene Column Reboiler Fuel gas knock out drum
Cumene Column Steam Generator MP Flash Drum
Cumene Product-Circulating Condensate Exchanger LP Flash Drum
Cumene Product-Recycle Benzene Exchanger LLP Flash Drum
Cumene Product Trim Cooler Closed Drain Drum
Cumene Column Reboiler Cumene rundown storage vessels
PIPB Column Condenser Degasser drum
PIPB Column Reboiler Reactors
Fuel gas vaporizer Alkylation Reactor
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 411
Equipment list for Cumene
Alkylation Reactor Effluent Recycle Cooler Transalkylation Reactor
PIPB Column Bottoms Cooler Package Units
Pumps PIPB Column Vacuum System
Propylene Feed Column Reflux Pumps (Phase 1)/Deethanizer Reflux Pumps (Phase 2)
Miscellaneous
Propylene Charge Pumps Benzene Feed Coalescer
Propylene Rerun Column Reflux Pumps (Phase 2)
Propylene Deinventory Pump (Phase 1)
Alkylation Reactor Effluent Recycle Pumps
Depropanizer Overhead Pumps
Benzene Feed Water Injection Pumps
Benzene Column Overhead Pumps
Benzene Recycle Pumps
Benzene Column Bottoms Pumps
Cumene Column Overhead Pumps
Cumene Column Bottoms Pumps
PIPB Column Overhead Pumps
PIPB Column Sidedraw Pumps
PIPB Column Bottoms Pumps
LLP Condensate Transfer Pump
Closed drain drum Pumps
Cumene Transfer Pumps
Offspec Cumene Pumps
Degasser Drum Pump
Equipment List of OSBL
Exchangers Vessels
Hot Condensate / DMW Exchanger Plant Air Receiver
Condensate Cooler Instrument Air Receiver
Caustic Cooler N2 Receiver
Compressed Air Cooler Acetone Purge Storage Vessel
Acetone Vent Condenser Light Hydrocarbon urge Vessel
Residue Cooler Tankfarm Phenol Drain Drum
Pumps Tankfarm Cumene Drain Drum
Condensate Transfer Pump Tankfarm Benzene Drain Drum
Polished Condensate Transfer Pump Flare Knock out drum
Caustic Unloading /Transfer Pumps Benzene drag storage vessel
98wt% H2SO4 unloading / Transfer Pumps
30wt% HCl Unloading /Transfer Pump Tanks
Cooling Tower Circulation Pumps Condensate Storage Tank
Drain Pump for Cooling Tower Polished Condensate Storage Tank
Chilled Water Circulation Pump 48wt% Caustic Storage Tank
Raw Water Transfer Pumps 30wt% Caustic Dilution Tank
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 412
Equipment List of OSBL
Service Water Transfer Pumps 98wt% H2SO4 Storage Tank
Potable Water Transfer Pumps 30 wt% HCl Storage Tank
DM Water Transfer Pumps Chilled Water Storage Tank
Neutralization Pit Transfer Pump Service Water Storage Tank
Waste Water Transfer Pumps Potable Water Storage Tank
Treated Effluent Transfer Pump DM Water Storage Tank
Product Phenol Loading Pumps Product Phenol Storage Tank
Hydrated Phenol Loading Pumps Hydrated Phenol Storage Tank
Product Acetone Loading Pump Product Acetone Storage Tank
Cumene Unloading Pumps Cumene Storage Tank
Cumene Transfer Pumps Cumene / Benzene Storage Tank
Product AMS Loading Pump Product AMS Storage Tank
Heavies Loading Pump Heavies Storage Tank
Purge Loading Pump Propylene Bullets
Tankfarm Phenol Drain Pump Propylene Bullets
Tankfarm Drain Pump Propane Bullet
Fire Water Pumps (DE) PIPB storage tank
Fire Water Pumps (EL) Package Units
Jocky Pump Condensate Polishing Unit
Benzene transfer pumps Cooling Tower
Tankfarm Benzene Drain Pump Side Steam Filtration
Flare KOD Pumps Cooling Tower Dosing Unit
Propylene Feed Charge Pumps Chilled Water Glycol Package
Propane Loading Pumps Raw Water Treatment / DM Water
Package
PIPB Drag Transfer Pumps Air Dryer Unit
Benzene Drag Transfer Pumps N2 PSA
Liquid Nitrogen Package
Effluent Treatment Package
Boiler Package
Coal Handling System
DEEPAK PHENOLICS LIMITED ADDITION IN THE EXISTING PLANT AT
DAHEJ GIDC ANNEXURES
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | JUNE 2017 413
Annexure 25: Environmental Policy of DPL
CONTACT DETAILS
Vadodara (Head Office)
871/B/3, GIDC Makarpura, Vadodara, India – 390 010.
E: [email protected]; T:+91-265-6131000
Delhi / NCR
Spaze IT Park, Unit No. 1124, 11th Floor, Tower B-3, Sector 49, Near Omaxe
City Center Mall, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, India – 122 002
E: [email protected]; T: 0124-424 2430-436
Kadam Environmental Consultants w w w . ka d a m en v i r o . c o m
Envi ronment for Deve lopment