DREAMS AND AGE
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
7 -
download
0
Transcript of DREAMS AND AGE
DREAMS AND AGING
Marco Zanasi, Simone De Persis, Manlio Caporali, Alberto Siracusano
Unità Operativa di Psichiatria - Università Tor Vergata Roma
Corresponding author: Marco Zanasi, Via Giuseppe Tomassetti, 7 – 00161, Rome, Italy
Email: [email protected]
This paper is not currently under consideration elsewhere
The rather limited data existing on the influence age has on reports of dreams appears to show
that the aging process is associated with a reduced ability to remember and recount dreams.
Zepelin (1973) reported an age–related decrease in dream recall, especially after 50 years of age.
Giambra, (1974, 1977-78; 1979-80) reported decreases in dreams frequency in the elderly for
both men and women, although the women recall more dreams than men (Giambra, Jung,
Grodsky, 1996). Herman and Shows (1983-84) found, based upon retrospective reports, that the
number of days with dreams decreased with age.
These findings can be in part related to the small reduction of REM sleep with increased age
(Miles & Dement, 1980). Reduced dream recall in the elderly could be also a result of memory
decrements associated with senescence or of a failure of initial memory consolidation (Giambra
& Arenberg, 1993).
Other researchers have interpreted these findings as the sign of a diminished interest in dreams,
and not as a consequence of a weakening of the memory (Strunz, 1993). More recent studies
suggest that the ability to recall dreams is an acquired cognitive skill that depends in part on the
development of the neural network responsible for spatial perception in the parietal lobes and
that children's clearer memory of dreams is linked to their visuospatial capacities (Foulkes, 1982,
1983, 1993, 1996a, 1996b, 1999; Solms, 2000; Domhoff, 2001).
The data are less clear concerning dream content, but seem show a change in emotional themes,
for example, with elderly subjects’ dreams characterised by a higher incidence of nightmares
(Salvio, Wood, Schwartz, Eichling, 1992) and, also, a reduction in emotion (aggression,
friendship and activity) (Waterman, 1991). Other studies report greater kindness in the dream
content and emotional content showing greater contentment and less anger, shame, disgust and
contempt (Howe & Blick, 1983; Blick& Howe, 1984).
There is evidence of a small age-related decline in dream distortion (bizarreness) and family-
related content, and slight age-related decline of aggression in dreams. (Zepelin, 1980-81, 1981).
Relatively little is known about the various sensory experiences in dream reports that occur
without known external stimuli and their modifications with aging (Calkins, 1893; Weed &
Hallam, 1893; Hacker, 1911; Bentley, 1913; Kohler, 1913; Knapp, 1956; Snyder, 1970;
McCarley & Hobson, 1979; Zadra, Nielsen, Donderi, 1998).
The above data derive mainly from the analysis of dream content and report frequency. Instead,
the present study investigated age-related modifications in dream activity using an original
approach based on the textual analysis. Such an approach may help clarify which aspects of
dream activity change with aging, and in particular if variations in dream recall are associated
with modifications in the semantic structure of the text of the dreams.
METHODS
Participants were 148 elderly people all over the age of 70 (M age=75.879 ys., SD=8.42) in good
health and 151 control participants between the ages of 18 and 25 (M age=22.45 ys., SD=3.23).
The elderly subjects were recruited from Old Peoples' Clubs and Universities for Senior Citizens
during lectures (these are institutions providing recreational and study facilities for people over
65 in Italy). The control participants were students from the "Tor Vergata" University, Rome.
The research team gave out general information about the aim of our research and people
showing interest in the experiment were contacted a week later. All subjects were asked to
recount the last dream they could remember and this was tape-recorded and transcribed as an
accurate working copy. All participants were asked to sign an informed consent form approved
by the Ethical Committee of the "Tor Vergata" University, Rome.
In order to analyse the dreams according to the Jungian vision (which looks at the dream
as a text produced by the dreamer's unconscious while he sleeps; Jung, 1945) we used
processing techniques deriving from textual analysis (Gigliozzi, 1997). If we consider the dream
as a text, that is, as a well-knit whole, then a fortiori we may consider the dream verbally as a
particular form of text which transforms the oneiric experience into an objective product. The
dream, while it is being dreamed, is experience, not text. Memory of that experience, whether
reported or not, is the text of the dream. The dream becomes a text the moment the initial
experience of it has ended, just as a waking experience can become a text as soon as we are able
to reflect on it as "something that happened" to us (Kilroe, 2000). The fundamental elements of
a narrative have been proposed by Chatman (1978). He divides narrative into two fundamental
parts: the story and the discourse. The story is the content or chain of events (i.e., the actions and
occurrences) and excludes those elements that could be described as contextual variables (i.e.
the characters and setting). The discourse is the form of expression or the means by which the
content is communicated. In simple terms, the story represents what is described in a narrative
and the discourse is concerned with how (Chatman, 1978). In this work we studied the discourse
of the dream. There are numerous studies supporting the belief that reported dreams are a
faithful representation of the dream itself. Jung seems to presuppose the adequacy of the dream
report as a valid object of textual inquiry, (Jung, ibidem).. Numerous studies that have analysed
the contents of dreams show that oneiric content is, in general, analogous to waking thoughts
(Kramer et al., 1975). Experiments in which stimuli administered during sleep were shown to
have been incorporated into the dreams confirm the existence of a relationship between the
oneiric experience and the reported dream. (Kramer et al. 1983). Other experimental research
has confirmed that there is a significant similarity between oneiric experience and the reported
dream (Roffwarg et al., 1962; Taub et al,1978). More recently Kramer (1993) hypothesizes that
verbal accounts accurately represent the original oneiric event. Proceeding from this starting
point, we used some of the textual analysis techniques developed in relation to the analysis of
literary texts for an analysis of our material (Gigliozzi, 1997). In particular, the oneiric text was
evaluated along the general lines as follows:
1. The composition of the text and its definition of character
2. The report’s temporal organisation, i.e., the tenses used in the dream report. The
narrator of a story or episode can choose between two alternatives: he can either state the
facts by following the order in which they occurred within a referential (or pseudo-
referential) universe or manipulate the narrative's temporal sequences.
3. The emotional organisation: the narrative text does not set out a story in an
objective and linear fashion but is, in some way, organised by the sender to fit the
receiver. The sender programs the moments and ways in which the data can be received
and the story is reconstructed by the receiver, as well as the receiver’s emotional
responses. To this end, the sender can choose how to represent the story and make use of
certain artifices: the use of anacronia, particular ways of using quantitative elucidation,
coup de théàtre, narrative paralipsis (passing to one side) and ellipsis (the omission of
information) and the attribution of an emotional charge to determinate syntagmas1. The
sum total of such artifices constitutes the speech's emotional aspect or seiemic (excited)
narrative level. An analysis of the speech's seiemic level can be understood in two
different ways: in the broad sense, as the global analysis of the text's formal organisation
seen from a seiemic perspective or, in the narrower sense, as the analysis of the speech's
emotional unities or seiems.
4. The semantic fields. Semantic fields are groups of words (nouns, verbs,
adjectives or adverbs) that are used to describe a particular situation, environment or body
of objects constituting a part of our everyday life and creating precise associations in our
minds. A semantic field is the area of meaning that a body of words regarding a given
subject has.
In particular, the above categories of analysis are represented by the following measured
parameters (Table I):
Composition of text (Place and Context)
1. The presence or absence of an observation that defined the place in which the oneiric
scene took place and, in the case of such a presence, the further specification of the type
of space defined (open or enclosed).
(b) The definition of the narrative's context or of what could be defined the setting for the
oneiric narrative, paying particular attention (in the case of a well-characterised context) to
the descriptive or emotional quality of such a definition.
Temporal Organization (Chronology, Narrative Sequence and Verb Tenses)
1 syntagma - a syntactic string of words that forms a part of some larger syntactic unit
The presence or absence of chronological observations contributing to a setting of the scene in
which the action takes place.
2. (d) Linearity or lack of it in the narrative sequence (eg. the presence or absence of
flashbacks or of tearing in the narrative texts's continuity and consistency etc). (e)
Uniformity or lack of it in the narrative's verb tenses and, where they are uniform, the
temporal allocation of the action (present or past).
Emotional Organization (Speech, Characters, Situation and Emotivity)
(f) The narrative speech's structure or the prevalence of direct or indirect speech or of
descriptions given from a position outside the narrative sequence. (g) The cast of
characters or definition of the dreamer's position as well as that of other possible actors
in the oneiric scene. (h) Clarification or lack of it regarding the dreamer's emotional state
(fear, anger, anguish etc). (i) A definition of the situation represented as fantastical or
realistic.
The number of words used to compose the narrative was, moreover, counted for every dream.
Semantic Fields
Semantic fields were evaluated by assessing all the lemmas2 relating to the senses (sight,
hearing, smell and taste) and measuring the frequency of their occurrence in the dreams
of the two groups examined. We studied these particular semantic fields to investigate the
modification (if it occured) of the various sensory modes in dreams with aging. A study
of semantic fields faces the problem of polysemy [the ambiguity of an individual word or
phrase that can be used (in different contexts) to express two or more different meanings]. The
computer is only able to supply a list of the frequency with which the lemmas potentially
linked to the semantic field arise in the text. It is not able to assess ambiguity linked to
2 the set of different forms of a word, such as the inflected forms of a verb. Ex. 'sing', 'sang', 'sung' are one lemma,
'boy', 'boys' another.
polysemy and the fact that words often have multiple meanings depending on the context.
For example, in Italian (which was the language spoken by the study's subjects), the term
"Sentire" and its related lemmas can refer to the auditory semantic field ("sento una voce"
- "I can hear a voice"), the olfactory one ( "Sento un odore" - "I can smell something"),
the emotional one ("mi sento male" - "I'm not feeling too good"), etc. If this problem is to
be overcome, it is necessary to have recourse to a process of clarification by human
examiner. Studies carried out by Fortier and Keen (1999, The reliability of human
disambiguation in text markup. ACH- ALLC Conference. KJ Keen PA. Fortier Available
at http://www.iath.virginia.edu/ach-allc.99/schedule.html) confirm that the use of human
examiners for studying semantic fields or literary themes is a justifiable enterprise from
the statistical perspective. To this end, the various lemmas were assessed separately by
two examiners using the Key Word In Context (KWIC) version of the software Textual
Analysis Computing Tools (TACT3), an interactive full-text retrieval system with a
number of analytical tools. Like others of its kind, TACT retrieves segments of text
according to specified word forms. In addition, it can find words or character-strings that
match criteria the user specifies. It was used initially only in the field of literary criticism,
as for an objective method of studying the works of different authors without being
bound by the personal approach of individual researchers. The application of this
software to a text allows identification of single individual words and also the meaning of
the word in particular contexts via the statistical processing of meaningful correlations
between different key words. With TACT it has been possible to obtain the list of KWIC
concordances which is made up of lists of symbol-words or key-words (i.e., the most
meaningful words amongst those which appear most frequently) inserted in their original
context. The methodology described above permits the underlining of the hierarchical
3 Key Word In Context: the drawing up of the concordances i.e. of the word index inserted in the context in which the
word was located
position that symbol-words occupy in dream material by reference to their absolute and
relative frequency of occurrence.
Analyses
The frequency distributions for the dream's descriptive variables were analysed and studied both
individually and by correlations. A two-dimensional Contingency table was created for every
pair of variables and the absolute frequencies for each line/column intersection were entered.
The two-dimensional distributions were processed using the test in order to evaluate the
characteristic distributions.
The length of the dreams' texts (both for elderly subjects and control subjects) was compared
under the various sub-headings created by the descriptive variables. The comparison test was
conducted by analysing the variance from a chosen classification criterion (the ANOVA test).
The T-Test was used to analyse the difference between the number of words in the elderly
subjects' dreams and that in the young peoples' dreams.
Contingency tables provided the dependence degree existing between the different couples of
variables considered. The chosen statistical analysis lead to the mean Cramer index of
contingency. Tables of Contingency with a p>0.05 were excluded. The number of words, both
for elderly subjects and control subjects, was compared under the various subheadings created by
the above parameters. The comparison test was conducted by analysing the variance from a
chosen classification criterion (the ANOVA test).
RESULTS
A modest difference in the total number of words used to recount dreams was found, (t= 1.86, p
= .067), consistent with findings reported by Watermann (1991). Statistics revealed the
following significant differences between the two groups in the measured parameters: enclosed
space, open space, place absent, context descriptive, context emotional, context absent,
narrative linear, narrative broken, action time present, action time absent, situation
fantastic, situation realistic, character/alone, character/actors, speech direct, speech
indirect, speech alternates, verb tens/present, verb tens/alternating, emotivity explicit
statement (Table 2).
Another significant result regards the semantic fields. A significant prevalence in the statements
was made by the younger group regarding sight, (Table 3).
Among the main results of the statistical analysis we mention the relevant difference between the
two groups for the value of the Cramer indexes (Table 4). The index distribution is nearly always
complementary: high values were found in the elderly, whereas in the controls the values were low,
and viceversa. The conclusion we draw is that the two samples dream in a different manner and,
therefore, aging causes evident changes in the oneiric production and dream report.
DISCUSSION
The first result to emerge from a summary analysis of the results, and one which is worth
emphasizing, is the presence of significant associations between the descriptive textual
parameters examined in terms of their mutual relationships. This appears to support the theory of
a narrative principle at work in the process of forming the dream which would organise it as "a
perceived sequence of events that are connected in a non-casual manner" (Toolan's definition of
narrative, 1988). In other words, a careful analysis focusing on the dream text's connecting
constituents indicates that it is structured in the form of a narrative.
The results relative to the single measures are not of easy interpretation and need further
study. Regarding the emotivity, the differences in expressed emotivity across the two age groups
seem to support past results showing a reduction in emotions in elderly subjects' dreams
(Waterman, 1991). This finding can be related to the fact that, as many studies show, in the
elderly there is a reduction in emotions and a greater control of the emotions (Malatesta &
Kalnok, 1984; Diener, Sandvik, Larsen 1985; Barrick, Hutchinson, Deckers 1989; Stacey &
Gatz, 1991; Lawton, Kleban, Rajagopal, Dean 1992; McConatha, Leona, Armstrong 1997;
Deptula, Singh, Pomara 1993; Carstensen, Pasupathi, Mayr, Nesselroade 2000; Birditt &
Fingerman, 2003; Charles, Reynold, Gatz 2001). It is important to consider that these findings
can be explained by cohort effects. The cohort effects show higher positive affect among older
adults than among younger adults (Gross, Carstensen, Pasupathi, Tsai, Skorpen, Hsu, 1997;
Mroczek & Kolarz, 1998 ).
Another finding of great interest concerns the difference between the Control and the
elderly participants in relation to the semantic field Sight. This, in our opinion, signals a decline
in visual sensory experiences experienced during dreams and reported in the elderly participant’s
dream account.
This finding is less easily interpreted. A possible explanation could be tied to a selective
senescence in the neural networks involved in the dream's genesis and those linked to the
visuospatial memory, in particular. Studies using PET (positron emission tomography) show that
different neural networks are recruited when different kinds of information need to be stored in
working memory. The studies show that different networks are used for visuospatial information
and verbal information (Baddeley, 1996; Jonides, Schumacher, Smith, Lauber, Awh, Minoshima,
Koeppe 1997; Smith & Jonides, 1998). Verbal working memory is lateralized in the left
hemisphere; it involves frontal regions and posterior parietal regions. In contrast, spatial working
memory is relatively bilateral, but with a right-hemisphere dominance; it again involves frontal
and parietal areas. (Smith & Jonides, 1997, 1999). Working memory undergoes a modification as
age advances, in the sense that the older adults show a global pattern of anterior bilateral
activation for both types of memory. After the age of 70 the verbal working memory is more
bilateral and visual memory show a complete bilateralization in frontal regions for (Smith,
Jonides, Koeppe, Marhuetz 1998; Reuter-Lorenz, Jonides, Smith, Hartley, Millera, Marshuetza,
Koeppe 2000; Morcom, Good, Frackowiak, Rugg 2003).
These data would seem to demonstrate that aging leads to less reliance on "specialised" areas and
more recruitment of homologous areas in the other hemisphere to compensate for neural decline.
This datum therefore seems to suggest that visuospatial memory becomes increasingly
"vulnerable" with advancing age. It is known that in many situations, visual input tends to
dominate the other sensory modes of expressing memory and perception (Colavita, 1974;
Rollins, Schurman, Evans, Knoph 1975; Arenberg, 1976; Podros, Wyke, Waters 1981; Colley &
Fossey, 1986; Reeve, Mackey, Fober 1986; Penney, 1989; Berkinblit, Fookson, Smetanin,
Adamovich, Poizner 1995; Barry, Bloomberg, Huebner 1997) and in the fastest responses visual
dominance appears to be related to the relatively weak capacity of visual inputs to alert the
organism to their occurrence (Posner, Nissen, Klein 1976) In response to this reduced state of
alert, the subject tends to keep his/her attention "tuned" to the visual system. The reduction in
vision-associated lemmas could be caused by a reduction in the capacity for active tuning, unlike
auditory perception which operates through a more passive reception and does not need to be
kept tuned.
REFERENCES
Alwin, D. (1996) Coresidence beliefs in American society from 1973 to 1991.
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 393-403.
Arenberg, D. (1976) The effects of input condition on free recall in young and
old adults. J Gerontol. Sep 31(5), 551-555.
Baddeley, A.D. (1996) Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 9, 5-28
Barrick, A.L., Hutchinson, R.L., Deckers, L.H. (1989) Age effects on
positive and negative emotions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 421-429.
Barry, S.R., Bloomberg, J.J., Huebner, P.P. (1997) The effect of visual context
on manual localization of remembered targets. Neuroreport, 8(2), 469-473.
Bentley, M. (1915) The study of dreams: method adapted to the seminary.
Amer J Psychol, 26, 196-210.
Berkinblit, M.B., Fookson, O.I., Smetanin, B., Adamovich, S.V., Poizner, H.
(1995) The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and
remembered targets, Exp Brain Res. 107(2), 326-330.
Birditt, K.S., Fingerman, K.L. (2003) Age and gender differences in adults' descriptions of
emotional reactions to interpersonal problems. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 58(4),
237-245.
Blick, K.A., Howe, J.B. (1984) A comparison of the emotional content of
dreams recalled by young and elderly women. J Psychol, 116 (1), 143-146.
Calkins, M.W. (1893) Statistics of dreams. Amer J Psychol, 5, 311-343.
Carstensen, L.L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U., Nesselroade, J.(2000) Emotion
experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 79, 644-655.
Charles, S.T., Reynolds, C.A., Gatz, M. (2001) Age-related differences and
change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. J Pers Soc Psychol. 80(1), 136-151
Chatman, S. (1978) Story and discourse: narrative structure in fiction and film.
Ithaca London: Cornell Univer. Press.
Colavita, F.B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception &
Psychophysics, 16(2), 409–412.
Colley, A., Fossey, J. (1986) Reproduction of complex movements: the effects
of the presence of vision during encoding or at recall. Br J Psychol, 77 (1), 75-84.
Deptula, D., Singh, R., Pomara, N. (1993) Aging, emotional states, and memory.
Am J Psychiatry, 150(3), 429-434.
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Larsen, R.J. (1985) Age and sex differences for
emotional intensity. Developmental Psychology, 21, 542-546.
Domhoff, G.W. (2001) A new neurocognitive theory of dreams. Dreaming, 11,
13-33.
Fortier, P.A., Keen, K.J. (1999) The reliability of human disambiguation in text
markup. ACH- ALLC Conference. KJ. Keen PA. Fortier [on-line] Available at http://
www.iath.virginia.edu/ach- allc.99/schedule.html
Foulkes, D. (1982) Children's dreams. New York: Wiley
Foulkes, D. (1983) Cognitive processes during sleep: evolutionary aspects. In
A. Mayes (Ed.), Sleep mechanisms and functions in humans and animals: an
evolutionary perspective. Wokington UK: Van Nostrand Reinhold pp 313-337.
Foulkes, D. (1993) Data constraints on theorizing about dream function. In A.
Moffitt, M. Kramer, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The functions of dreaming. Albany, NY:
SUNY Press pp 11-20.
Foulkes, D. (1996a) Dream research: 1953-1993. Sleep, 19, 609-624.
Foulkes, D. (1996b) Misrepresentation of sleep-laboratory dream research with
children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 205-206.
Foulkes, D. (1999) Children's dreaming and the development of consciousness.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
Giambra, L.M. (1974) Daydreaming across the life span: Late adolescence to
senior citizen. International Joumal of Aging and Human Development, 5, 115-140.
Giambra, L.M. (1977-78) Adult male daydreaming across the life span:
replication, further analyses, and tentative norms based upon retrospective reports.
International Joumal of Aging and Human Development, 8, 197-228.
Giambra, L.M. (1979-80) Sex differences in daydreaming and related mental
activity from late teens to the early nineties. International Joumal of Aging and Human
Development, 10, 1-34.
Giambra, L.M., Arenberg, D. (1993) Adult age differences in forgetting
Sentences. Psychology and Aging 8, 451-462.
Giambra, L.M., Jung R.E., Grodsky, A. (1996) Age changes in dream recall in
adulthood dreaming: Dreaming:l 6(1). 17-31.
Gigliozzi, G. (1997) Il testo e il computer. Manuale di informatica per gli studi
letterari. Milano: B. Mondadori.
Gross, J.J., Carstensen, L.L., Pasupathi, M., Tsai, J., Skorpen, C.G., Hsu,
A.Y.C. (1997) Emotion and aging: experience, expression, and control. Psychology and
Aging, 12, 590-599.
Hacker, F. (1911) Systematische traumbeobachtungen mit besonderer
berucksichtigung der Gadanken, Arch ges Psychol, 21: 1-21.
Herman, S., Sows,W.D. (1983-84) How often do adults recall their dreams?
International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 18, 243-254.
Howe, J.B., Blick, K.A. (1983) Emotional content of dreams recalled by elderly Women
Perceptual and Moort Skills, 56(1):31-4.
Jonides, J., Schumacher, E.H., Smith, E.E., Lauber, E.J., Awh, E.,
Minoshima S., Koeppe, R.A. (1997) Verbal working memory load affects regional brain
activation as measured by PET, The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 462-475
Jung, C.G. (1945) L'essenza dei Sogni. Opere. Vol.8. Torino: Boringhieri.
Kilroe, P. (2000). The Dream as text, the dream as narrative. Dreaming,Vol.
10(3), 125-138.
Knapp, P.H. (1956) Sensory impressions in dreams. Psychoanal Q, 325-347.
Kohler, P. (1913) Ein beitrag zar traumpsychologie. Arch f.d. ges Psychol, 27,
235-240.
Kramer, M. (1993) Dream translation: an approach to understanding dreams.
In G. Delaney (Ed.), New directions in dream interpretation. Albany, NY: SUNY Press:
pp.155-194.
Kramer, M., Kinney, L., Scharf, M. (1983) Dream incorporation and dream
function. In W. Koella (Ed.), Sleep 1982: the 6th European congress on sleep research,
Zurich, 1982. Basel: Karger. Pp.369-371.
Kramer, M., Roth, T., Czaya, J. (1975) Dream development within a REM
period. In P. Levin and W. Koella (Eds.), Sleep 1974: the 2nd European congress on
sleep research, Rome, 1974. Basel: Karger. Pp. 406-408.
Lawton, M.P., Kleban, M.H., Rajagopal, D., Dean, J. (1992) The dimensions
of affective experience in three age groups. Psychology and Aging, 7, 171-184.
Malatesta, C.Z., Kalnok, M. (1984) Emotional experience in younger and older
Adults. J Gerontol. 39(3), 301-8.
McCarley, R.W, Hobson, J.A. (1979) The form of dreams and the biology of
sleep. In Wolman BB, (ed.) Handbook of dreams: Research theory and applications,
New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.. Pp. 76-130.
McConatha, J.T., Leone, F.M., Armstrong, J.M. (1997) Emotional control in
Adulthood. Psychol Rep. 80(2), 499-507.
Miles, L.E., Dement, W.C (1980) Sleep and aging. Sleep, 3, 119-220.
Morcom, A.M., Good, C.D., Frackowiak, R.S.J., Rugg, M.D. (2003) Age effects
on the neural correlates of successful memory encoding. Brain, 126, No. 1, 213-229.
Mroczek, D. K., Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and
negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 75, 1333-1349.
Penney, C.G. (1989) Modality effects in delayed free recall and recognition:
visual is better than auditory. Q J Exp Psychol A, 41(3), 455-470.
Podros, L.Z., Wyke, M.A., Waters, J.M. (1981) Vision and kinesthesis in
spatial short-term memory. Percept Mot Skills. 53(2), 459-466.
Posner, M.I., Nissen, M.I., Klein, R.M. (1976) Visual dominance: An
information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review,
83(2), 157-171.
Reeve, T.G., Mackey, L.J., Fober G.W. (1986) Visual dominance in the cross-
modal kinesthetic to kinesthetic plus visual feedback condition. Perceptual and Motor
Skills 62(1), 243-252.
Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., Jonides, J., Smith, E.E., Hartley, A., Millera, A.,
Marshuetza, C., Koeppe, R.A. (2000) Age differences in the frontal lateralization of
verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
12, 174-187.
Roffwarg, H., Dement, W., Muzio, J., Fisher, C. (1962) Dream imagery:
Relationship to rapid eye movements of sleep. Archives of General Psychiatry, 7, 235-
258.
Rollins, H.A., Schurman, D.L., Evans, M.J., Knoph, K. (1975) Auditory versus
visual processing of three sets of simultaneous digit pairs. J Exp Psychol [Hum Learn],
104(2), 173-181.
Salvio, M.A., Wood, J.M., Schwartz, J., Eichling, P.S. (1992) Nightmare
prevalence in the healthy elderly. Psychol Aging, 7(2), 324-325.
Smith, E.E., Jonides, J. (1997) Working memory: a view from neuroimaging.
Cognitive Psychol. 33, 5-42.
Smith, E.E., Jonides, J (1999) Storage and executive processes in the frontal
Lobes. Science, 283, 1657-1661.
Smith, E.E., Jonides, J., Koeppe, R.A., Marshuetz, C. (1998) Components of
verbal working memory: evidence from neuroimaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US, 95,
876-882.
Snyder, F. (1970) The phenomenology of dreaming. In Madow L. & Snow LH
(eds.) The psychoanalytic implications of the psychophysiological studies on dreams..
Springfield, III: Charles C. Thomas. Pp. 124-151.
Solms, M. (2000). Dreaming and REM sleep are controlled by different brain
mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(6), 843-850, 904-1018, 1083–1121.
Stacey, C.A., Gatz, M. (1991) Cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal
change on the Bradburn Affect Balance Scale. Journal of Gerontology, 46, 76-78.
Strunz, F. (1993) Dreams in the elderly: contents and clinical usefulness.
Gesundheitswesen, 55(11) 595-601.
Taub, J., Kramer, M., Arand, D., Jacobs, G. (1978) Nightmare dreams and
nightmare confabulations. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 19, 285-291.
Toolan, M.J. (1988) Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. London New
York: Routledge.
Waterman, D. (1991) Aging and memory for dreams. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 73, 355-365.
Weed, S.C, Hallam, F.M. (1893) A study of the dream-consciousness. Amer J
Psychol, 5, 311-343.
Zadra, A.L., Nielsen, T.A., Donderi, D.C. (1998), Prevalence of auditory,
olfactory, and gustatory experiences in home dreams. Perceptual and
MotorSkills, 87, 819-826.
Zanasi M., De Persis, C., (2000) Analisi Testuale dei Sogni. (unpublished)
Zepelin, H. (1973). A survey of age differences in sleep patterns and dream
recall among well-educated men and women [Abstract]. Sleep reviews, 2, 81.
Zepelin, H. (1980-81) Age differences in dreams: I. Men's dreams and thematic
apperceptive fantasy. Int J Aging Hum Dev, 12(3), 171-186
Zepelin, H. (1981) Age differences in dreams: II. Distortion and other variables.
Int J Aging Hum Dev, 13(1), 37-41.
***
TACT (Textual Analysis Computing Tools) is available [on-line] at:
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/cch/TACT/tact0.html
Summary. This work evaluates the association of age and dream reports. The verbal reports of
148 dreams of elderly people (M age=75,8) were compared with 151 dreams of a control group
of young people (M age=22.0). The dreams were analyzed according to the Jungian vision
(which looks at the dream as a text produced by the dreamer's unconscious while sleeping) using
processing techniques deriving from textual analysis. Significant differences were found between
the number of words denoting emotion, with the young people reporting more explicit statements
regarding emotional states. Significant differences were found also in the verb tenses, with the
older people, when an emotional state was explicitly expressed in the dream texts, shifting
between present and past tense more frequently than the young people. A significant prevalence
in the semantic field of visual sense, with younger subjects using more sentences referring to
sight than the elderly participants.
Table 1
COMPOSITION
OF TEXT
Place
L1.1 Place
designation/Enclosed space.
L1.2 Place
designation/Open space.
L 1.3 Place
designation/Shifts. L 2.0 Place absent.
Context
CON 1 Context
descriptive. CON 2 Context emotional.
CON 3 Context absent.
TEMPORAL
ORGANIZATION
Chronology
CH 1 Action time
present.
CH 2 Action time
absent.
Narrative Sequence
SEQ 1 Narrative linear.
SEQ 2 Narrative broken.
Verb Tenses
T 1 Verb tens/present.
T 2 Verb tens/past.
T 3 Verb tens/alternating.
EMOTIONAL
ORGANIZATION
Speech
DIS 1 Speech direct.
DIS 2 Speech indirect.
DIS 3 Speech alternates.
DIS 4 Speech external.
Characters
P 1 Character/alone.
P 2 Character/extras.
P 3 Character/actors.
P 4 Character/observer.
Situation
S 1 Situation fantastic.
S 2 Situation realistic.
Emotivity
E 1 Emotivity explicit.
E 2 Emotivity absent.
NUMBER OF
WORDS
Number of words.
SEMANTIC
FIELDS
Semantic field/SIGHT.
Semantic field/HEARING.
Semantic field/TOUCH.
Semantic field/SMELL.
Semantic field/TASTE.
Table 2
Odds Ratios and other valutation parameters
(interval of confidence α=0,05)
CATEGORIES
PAR.
Elderly
Control
Place
L1.1
Odd Ratio = 0,4171 Odd Ratio = 2,39726
Int. Conf.= n. s. Int. Conf.= [1,4948 ; 17,6292]
χ2 = n. s. χ2 = 14,08; g.l. =1; p-value < 0,001
L1.2 Odd Ratio = 2,193057 Odd Ratio = 0,455984
Int. Conf.= [1,3573; 14,4804] Int. Conf.= n.s
χ2 =10,96; g.l. =1; p < 0,001 χ2 = n.s.
L1.3
Odd Ratio = 0,496813 Odd Ratio = 2,012829
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 = n.s. χ2= n.s.
L2.0 Odd Ratio = 1,843275 Odd Ratio = 0,542512
Int. Conf.= [1,1533; 10,0958] Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 =6,89; g.l. =1; p = 0,001 χ2= n.s.
Context
CON1 Odd Ratio =4,945993 Odd Ratio = 0,2021838
Int. Conf.= [3,1334; 221,9483] Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 = 52,40; g.l. =1; p < 0,001 χ2 = n.s.
CON2
Odd Ratio = 0,292187 Odd Ratio = 3,42246
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= [1,7868; 58,6945]
χ2 = n.s. χ2=15,59; g.l. =1; p < 0,001
CON3
Odd Ratio = 0,349852 Odd Ratio = 2,858349
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= [1,7450; 28,5543]
χ2= n.s. χ2 =18,89; g.l. =1; p < 0,001
Narrative
Sequence
SEQ1 Odd Ratio = 11,90101 Odd Ratio = 0,084026
Int. Conf.= [4,9582; 353831,9] Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2=46,01; g.l. =1; p < 0,001 χ2 = n.s.
SEQ2
Odd Ratio = 0,084026 Odd Ratio = 11,90101
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= [4,9582; 353831,9]
χ2= n.s. χ2 = 46,01; g.l. =1; p < 0,001
Temporal
Organization
CH1
Odd Ratio = 0,289316 Odd Ratio = 3,456422
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= [1,3857; 79,0782]
χ2= n.s. χ2 = 8,18; g.l. =1; p = 0,01
CH2 Odd Ratio = 3,456422 Odd Ratio = 0,289316
Int. Conf.= [1,3857; 79,0782] Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 = 8,18; g.l. =1; p = 0,01 χ2 = n.s.
Situation
S1 Odd Ratio = 3,218891 Odd Ratio = 0,310666
Int. Conf.= [1,9774; 40,6960] Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 = 24,18; g.l. =1; p < 0,001 χ2 = n.s.
S2
Odd Ratio = 0,310666 Odd Ratio = 3,218891
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= [1,9774; 40,6960]
χ2 = n.s. χ2 = 24,18; g.l. =1; p < 0,001
TABLE 2 (continuing)
Characters
P1
Odd Ratio = 0,551076 Odd Ratio = 1,814629 Int. Confid.= n.s. Int. Conf.= [1,0032; 11,1038]
χ2 = n.s. χ2 =4,12; g.l. =1; p = 0,05
P2
Odd Ratio = 0,714471 Odd Ratio = 1,399636
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2= n.s. χ2 = n.s.
P3 Odd Ratio = 2,000989 Odd Ratio = 0,499752
Int. Conf.= [1,3002; 11,3823] Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 = 10,49; g.l. =1; p = 0,01 χ2 = n.s.
P4
Odd Ratio = 0,426785 Odd Ratio = 2,343096
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf. N.s.
χ2 = n.s. χ2 = n.s.
Speech
DS1 Odd Ratio = 2,546584 Odd Ratio = 0,392682
Int. Conf.= [1,5808; 20,5609] Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 =15,86; g.l. =1; p < 0,001 χ2 = n.s.
DS2
Odd Ratio = 0,221383 Odd Ratio = 4,517045
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= 2,0484; 201,9069]
χ2 = n.s. χ2 = 16,77; g.l. =1; p < 0,001
DS3
Odd Ratio = 0,110798 Odd Ratio = 9,025424
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= [1,1315; 66297,5]
χ2 = n.s. χ2 = 6,51; g.l. =1; p = 0,02
DS4
Odd Ratio = 1,118583 Odd Ratio = 0,89398
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 = n.s. χ2= n.s.
Verb tenses
T1 Odd Ratio = 1,954976 Odd Ratio = 0,511552
Int. Conf.= [1,2106; 11,4063] Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 = 7,96; g.l. =1; p = 0,01 χ2 = n.s.
T2
Odd Ratio = 1,533165 Odd Ratio = 0,652245
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 = n.s. χ2 = n.s.
T3
Odd Ratio = 0,367289 Odd Ratio = 2,722646
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= [1,7173; 24,1304]
χ2 = n.s. χ2 = 19,51; g.l. =1; p < 0,001
Emotivity
E1
Odd Ratio = 0,363929 Odd Ratio = 2,747788
Int. Conf.= n.s. Int. Conf.= [1,7654; 24,2924]
χ2 = n.s. χ2 = 21,48; g.l. =1; p < 0,001
E2 Odd Ratio = 2,747788 Odd Ratio = 0,363929
Int. Conf.= [1,7654; 24,2924] Int. Conf.= n.s.
χ2 = 21,48; g.l. =1; p < 0,001 χ2 = n.s.
Table 3
Control and Elderly Groups: Differences in Frequencies of Semantic
Field/Sensory Statements in Dream Texts
GROUP Semantic Field
Sight Hearing Touch Smell Taste
CONTROL 110 * 18 5
0
1
ELDERLY 72 11 5 1
0
TOTAL 182 29 10 1 1
VALUES
= 18.59
p = 0.0001
=1,33
p= 0.247
not
appliable (1)
not
appliable (1)
not
appliable (1)
(1) Due to low number of data for Touch, Smell and Taste
Table 4
Compared Parameters Cramer Index %
Elderly Controls Context / place 39,52 2,68
Narrative sequence / Speech 16,75 -
Narrative sequence / Place 16,23 5,84
Emotivity / Context 15,20 18,61
Characters / Speech 10,95 6,15
Narrative sequence / Characters 9,48 -
Verb tens / Speech 6,22 2,70
Verb tens / Characters 5,19 4,64
Narrative sequence/ Situation 4,08 -
Chronology / Situation - 33,20
Verb tens / Place - 4,43
Narrative sequence / Emotivity - 3,91
Emotivity / Characters - 3,65
Emotivity / Speech - 3,57
Chronology / Speech - 3,37
Narrative sequence / Situation - 3,27
Emotivity / Verb tens - 3,20
Place / Speech - 2,54
Place / Characters - 2,32