Distribution of the entomopathogenic nematodes from La Rioja (Northern Spain
Transcript of Distribution of the entomopathogenic nematodes from La Rioja (Northern Spain
Journal of
www.elsevier.com/locate/yjipa
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139
INVERTEBRATE
PATHOLOGY
Distribution of the entomopathogenic nematodesfrom La Rioja (Northern Spain)
Raquel Campos-Herrera a, Miguel Escuer a, Sonia Labrador a, Lee Robertson a,Laura Barrios b, Carmen Gutierrez a,*
a Departamento de Agroecologıa, Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales (CCMA,CSIC), c/ Serrano 115 bis, 28006 Madrid, Spainb Departamento de Estadıstica, Centro Tecnico de Informatica (CTI,CSIC), c/ Pinar 19, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Received 22 December 2006; accepted 8 February 2007Available online 22 February 2007
Abstract
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) distribution in natural areas and crop field edges in La Rioja (Northern Spain) has been stud-ied taking into account environmental and physical–chemical soil factors. Five hundred soil samples from 100 sites of the most repre-sentative habitats were assayed for the presence of EPNs. The occurrence of EPNs statistically fitted to a negative binomial distribution,which pointed out that the natural distribution of these nematodes in La Rioja was in aggregates. There were no statistical differences(p 6 0.05) in the abundance of EPNs to environmental and physical–chemical variables, although, there were statistical differences in thealtitude, annual mean air temperature and rainfall, potential vegetation series and moisture percentage recovery frequency. Twenty-sevensamples from 14 sites were positive for EPNs. From these samples, twenty isolates were identified to a species level and fifteen strainswere selected: 11 Steinernema feltiae, two S. carpocapsae and two S. kraussei strains. S. kraussei was isolated from humid soils of cooland high altitude habitats and S. carpocapsae was found to occur in heavy soils of dry and temperate habitats. S. feltiae was the mostcommon species with a wide range of altitude, temperature, rainfall, pH and soil moisture, although this species preferred sandy soils.The virulence of nematode strains were assessed using G. mellonella as insect host, recording the larval mortality percentage and the timeto insect die, as well as the number of infective juveniles produced to evaluate the reproductive potential and the time tooks to leave theinsect cadaver to determinate the infection cycle length. The ecological trends and biological results are discussed in relationship withtheir future use as biological control.� 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Steinernema carpocapsae; Steinernema feltiae; Steinernema kraussei; Biology; Distribution; Ecology; Entomopathogenic nematodes; Spain;Steinernematidae
1. Introduction
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) from Hetero-rhabtidae and Steinernematidae families have a symbioticassociation with enteric bacteria, forming the complexes:Xenorhabdus-Steinernematidae and Photorhabdus-Hetero-rhabditidae. These symbiotic associations result highly vir-ulent to insects, killing them rapidly (Boemare, 2002;Boemare et al., 1997). Entomopathogenic nematodes are
0022-2011/$ - see front matter � 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jip.2007.02.003
* Corresponding author. Fax: +34 915640800.E-mail address: [email protected] (C. Gutierrez).
widely distributed in soils throughout the world (Adamset al., 2006; Hominick, 2002; Hominick et al., 1996), andare considered one of the best non-chemical alternativesto insect pest control due to their ability to actively locateinsect-hosts as well as their high reproductive potential,capacity for mass production and the fact that they areharmless to vertebrates and plants (Burnell and Stock,2000; Gaugler, 2002; Gaugler and Kaya, 1990; Kaya andGaugler, 1993).
The application of non-native EPNs as biocontrolagents is used worldwide. Since environmental condi-tions influence survival, virulence and reproductive
126 R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139
potential of the EPNs strains, the efficacy of biologicalcontrol programs could be decreased. Many countriesand researchers are concerned about release of non-native nematodes, because they may have negativeeffects on non-target organisms and may partially orcompletely displace endemic EPNs (Bathon, 1996; Ehlersand Hokkanen, 1996; Lynch and Thomas, 2000; Millarand Barbercheck, 2001). In order to increase the efficacyof biological control programs and hence reducing theenvironmental risks, several countries are developingsurveys to isolate EPNs strains adapted to local ecolog-ical conditions, thereby restricting non-native nematodeimportations.
Recently, many surveys have been conducted in tem-perate areas of Europe: Austria (Hozzank et al., 2003)Belgium (Midituri et al., 1997), Bulgaria (Shishiniovaet al., 1998, 2000), Czechoslovakia (Mracek et al.,1999a, 2005), Denmark (Nielsen and Philipsen, 2003),Germany (Sturhan and Ruess, 1999), Poland (Bednarek,1998), Russia (Ivanova et al., 2000), Slovakia (Sturhanand Liskova, 1999), Switzerland (Steiner, 1996) and Uni-ted Kingdon (Gwynn and Richardson, 1996). Howeverthere is little information available about on EPNs fromMediterranean countries: Egypt (Shamseldean and Abd-Elgawad, 1994) Greece (Menti et al., 1997), Italy (Tarascoand Triggiani, 1997; Triggiani and Tarasco, 2000), Pales-tinian Territories (Iraki et al., 2000), Spain (De Doucetand Gabarra, 1994; Garcıa del Pino, 2005; Garcıa delPino and Palomo, 1996a,1997), and Turkey (Haziret al., 2003; Kepenekci, 2002; Susurluk et al., 2001,2003). Furthermore, studies of new strains about theirbiology, virulence and habitat preference can improvethe efficacy of field applications, thus it can be selectedvirulent strains with environmental and physical–chemicalsoil requirements compatible with the site for the EPNapplication. In order to contribute to the knowledgeabout these organisms for regional biological control pro-grams, the aim of this survey is to study the distribution,ecological requirements and virulence of EPNs from LaRioja (Northern Spain).
2. Material and methods
2.1. Samples collection and soil analysis
The survey was carried out from March to April of2003. The most representative areas were selected takinginto account environmental and physical–chemical soilfactors. Bioclimatic region in La Rioja include 10 potentialvegetation series (Fig. 1a): Oromediterranean region: 1,Vaccinio myrtilli-Junipereto nanae S.; Supramediterraneanregion: 2, Ilici-Fageto S.; 3, Festuco heterophyllae-
Querceto pyrenaicae S.; 4, Luzulo forsteri-Querceto pyrenai-
cae S.; 5, Junipero oxycedri-Querceto rotundifoliae S.; 6,Cephalanthero longifoliae-Querceto faginiae S.; 7, Juniperothuriferae-Querceto rotundifoliae S.; 8, Spiraeo obovaeta-
Quercetum rotundifoliae S.; and Mesomediterranean
region: 9, Asparago acutifolii-Quercetum rotundifoliae S.;10, Rhamno lycioidis-Quercetum cocciferae S. (Rivas-Martı-nez, 1987; Rivas-Martınez et al., 2001,2002). Soil type wasevaluated following the studies of Guerra and Monturiol(1970) and the Soil Survey Staff (1994) (Fig. 1b) obtaining11 soil types: 1, Haplic Calcisol; 2, Calcaric Cambisol; 3,Dystric Cambisol; 4, Calcaric Fluvisol; 5, Lithic Leptosol;6, Rendzic Leptosol; 7, Calcic Chromic, Luvisol; 8, Calca-ric Phaeozem; 9, Calcaric Regosol; 10, Dystric Regosol and11, Humic Cambisol. Data of annual average air tempera-ture and rainfall were recorded from the maps of Govern-ment of La Rioja (2001a,b) (Fig. 1c and d) and the altitudewas assessed in situ using the GPS system GARMIN�. Atotal of 500 soil samples were colleted from 100 sites partic-ularly those with a high incidence of insect populations(Hominick, 2002), such as natural areas (no. sites = 43),annual crop field edges of cereal and horticultural crops(no. = 38) and perennial crop field edges of fruit orchardand vineyards (no. = 19). Sampling habitats were classifiedas: natural grassland (NG), natural woodland (NW), natu-ral woodland scrub (NWS), natural scrub grassland(NSG), natural scrub (NS), annual crop edge-scrub (AS),perennial crop edge-scrub (PS), annual crop edge-scrub-grassland (ASG), annual crop edge-woodland-scrub(AWS), perennial crop edge-scrub-grassland (PSG), annualcrop edge-grassland (AG), and perennial crop edge-grass-land (PG).
Five soil samples were collected from each site, at leasttwo meters apart in transect sampling formation into an18–20 m2 plot. Each soil sample (approximately 1 kg) wastaken at a depth of 2–20 cm (Campbell et al., 1998; Yos-hida et al., 1998), placed in polyethylene bags to preventwater loss, transported to the laboratory under refrigeratedconditions, and stored at 12–15 �C until EPN evaluation.Each sampling site was characterised by bioclimatic regionswith the potential natural vegetation and soil types, habi-tat, altitude, annual average temperature and rainfall.For each soil sample, a 200 g portion was analysed for dif-ferent edaphological variables. Soil moisture was calcu-lated as: %H = (fresh weigh � dry weigh/dry weigh) ·100, where dry weigh was obtained after over dry soil at70 �C for 5 days. The pH was measured from a 1:2.5soil/mQ-water suspension. The sand, silt and clay contentswere evaluated by Bouyoucos method (MAPA, 1975). Inorder to compare the soil moisture trough different soil tex-ture types, the field capacity (FC) at pF 2.7 and wiltingpoint (WP) at pF 4.2 were determined by Richards’ method(Duchaufour, 1975) to calculate the available water in soil(FC-WP) in those positive samples for EPN presence. Allanalyses were performed by the Analytical Service of theEnvironmental Sciences Centre.
2.2. Isolation of entomopathogenic nematodes
Soil samples were roughly mixed and stored at roomtemperature for 24 h previous to the test for EPN occur-rence, using the insect baiting technique (Bedding and
Fig. 1. Environmental and edaphoecological characterization from La Rioja. (a) Potential vegetation series: 1, Vaccinio myrtilli-Junipereto nanae S.; 2,Ilici-Fageto S.; 3, Festuco heterophyllae-Querceto pyrenaicae S.; 4, Luzulo forsteri-Querceto pyrenaicae S.; 5, Junipero oxycedri-Querceto rotundifoliae S.; 6,Cephalanthero longifoliae-Querceto faginiae S.; 7, Junipero thuriferae-Querceto rotundifoliae S.; 8, Spiraeo obovaeta-Quercetum rotundifoliae S.; 9, Asparago
acutifolii-Quercetum rotundifoliae S.; 10, Rhamno lycioidis-Quercetum cocciferae S. (b) Soil type: 1, Haplic Calcisol; 2, Calcaric Cambisol; 3, DystricCambisol; 4, Calcaric Fluvisol; 5, Lithic Leptosol; 6, Rendzic Leptosol; 7, Calcic Chromic Luvisol; 8, Calcaric Phaeozem; 9, Calcaric Regosol; 10, DystricRegosol and 11, Humic Cambisol. (c) Annual average temperature. (d) Annual average rainfall.
R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139 127
Akhurst, 1975). Three soil subsamples from each samplewere placed in 90 mm · 15 cm diameter Petri dishes (Stuartand Gaugler, 1994), and the soil moisture was adjusted, ifrequired, by adding mQ-water (Milli-Q Water System, Mil-lipore S.A., Molsheim, France). Ten last instars larvae ofGalleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) were placedon the soil surface of each subsamples. Petri dishes wereinverted and incubated in darkness at 24 ± 1 �C with55% relative humidity (R.H.). Insects were recovered after6 days and the dead larvae were washed and individuallyplaced on White traps to allow the emergence of infectivejuveniles stage (White, 1927). In the case of negativeresults, the isolation was repeated two-fold to confirmresults of the first experiment. Emerging infective juvenile(IJs) from White traps was used to infect fresh G. mellonella
to produce nematodes for establishment of cultures andproduce individuals for identification purposes.
2.3. Identification of entomopathogenic nematodes
Morphological and biometric studies were carried outwith 25 juveniles and 25 first generation males from eachisolate (Hominick et al., 1997; Stock et al., 2000). Nema-todes were fixed and processed to glycerine following themethod described by Steinhorst (1966). Semipermanentslides were prepared following the procedures describedby Gomez et al. (2004). The characters for the identifica-
tion were: total length, greatest width, distance from ante-rior end to excretory pore, distance from anterior end tonerve ring, distance from anterior end to base oesophagus,tail length, length of the spicules, length of the gubernacu-lums, and values of ratio a, b, c, d, e, GS and SW (Adamsand Nguyen, 2002; Hominick et al., 1997). As recom-mended by Stock and Reid (2004), the species identificationbased on morpho-biometric studies was confirmed bymolecular analysis, using the PCR amplification conditionsdescribed by Hominick et al. (1997) and the primers 18Sand 26S described by Vrain et al. (1992). The method forPCR-RFLP analysis of the ITS region was carried out asdescribed by Campos-Herrera et al. (2006). The restrictionenzymes used were AluI, HinfI, RsaI and HhaI, due to theirutility for these studies (Reid and Hominick, 1998), EcoRIand HaeIII, frequently used by others authors (Cutler andStock, 2003; Hominick et al., 1997; Mracek et al., 2003;Reid et al., 1997; Stock and Koppenhofer, 2003; Yoshida,2004) and DraI, HincII y MnlI used by Nguyen (2003) andYoshida (2003).
2.4. Entomopathogenic nematodes distribution in relation to
environmental and soil characteristics of La Rioja
To explore the ecology of native EPN isolates, the occur-rence were assessed as recovery frequency (no. positivesamples/no. total samples) and abundance (no. positive
128 R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139
sites/no. total sites) (Liu and Berry, 1995), expressed as per-centage. The distribution of the positive samples in each sitewas adjusted to a negative binomial distribution (Ludwigand Reynolds, 1988) using the XLSTAT 2006 program.The occurrence of EPN was related to the environmentalvariables, vegetation (potential vegetation series and habi-tat) and soil characteristics. To study the influence of thosevariables, Crostabs and Pearson’s v2 tests at p 6 0.05 levelwere carried out to asses significant differences in EPNoccurrence. Two hierarchical cluster analysis betweenEPN strains and environmental variables (altitude, averageof annual temperature and rainfall, potential vegetation ser-ies, habitat and soil type) and physical–chemical soil vari-ables (available water, pH, and percentage of sand, siltand clay), were carried out to explore the associationsamong different EPN strains, using squared Euclidean dis-tance and the values were standardized with Z transforma-tion. Statistics analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0software for Windows XP.
2.5. Virulence, infection cycle length and infective juveniles
production of entomopathogenic nematode native strains
The bioassays were carried out using strains that couldbe maintained and reproduced in laboratory conditions.In this survey, when two or more isolated from the samesite were identified as species level and all were corre-sponded to the same species, only was taken into accountone strain in this site, because it was considered that in thissite the natural occurrence of this EPN species had a widedistribution in the transect than other which only one iso-lated identified to species level per site. The bioassay wasdesigned to evaluate the virulence, infection cycle lengthand IJs production of EPN isolates. A mQ-water suspen-sion of 4900 IJs/mL of each native EPN strain was pre-pared, and 300 lL were applied in two filter paper diskscovering button and lid of 5 cm diameter Petri dishes,obtaining 75 IJs/cm2. Five Petri dishes were used in eachassay, and filter paper disks of control treatment weremoistened with 300 lL of mQ-water. Five G. mellonella lar-vae of 200 ± 13.5 mg fresh weigh were placed in each Petridish and incubated in the dark at 22 ± 1 �C and 55% R. H.The bioassay was repeated 3 times. Insect mortality wasdaily recorded, and dead larvae were washed, individuallyplaced in White traps and incubated at the same conditionsas above. Cadavers were daily observed recording the IJsemergence. Infective juveniles were counted after 10 daysto obtain the total IJs production (Wang and Bedding,1996), and reproductive potential was expressed as no.IJs/mg larva. The days to dead larvae and percent of larvalmortality were recorded to estimate the native EPN viru-lence. The infection cycle length was assessed countingnumber of days from start infection until the first IJs emer-gence. Insect mortality was corrected by Abbott’s formula(Abbott, 1925), and mortality percentages were arc sinetransformed, previous statistical analysis of biological databy SPSS 13.0 software for Windows XP. ANOVA analysis
and Tukey’s test at p 6 0.05 was carried out to assess differ-ences among EPN strains. One hieratical cluster analysisbetween EPN strains and variables: mortality percentage,days to dead larvae, days to IJs emergence and reproduc-tive potential was carried out to establish associationgroups among EPN strains, using squared Euclidean dis-tance and the values were standardized with Ztransformation.
3. Results
3.1. Entomopathogenic nematode distribution in relation to
environmental variables and soil physical–chemical
characteristic from La Rioja
Entomopathogenic nematodes were recovered from 27of 500 soil samples (5.4%) of 14 of 100 sites (14%) spreadwithin La Rioja (Fig. 2), although only 20 isolates couldbe identified at species level. The study of positive samplesfrequency showed that most the sites were negative forEPNs occurrence, some of them had only 1 positive sam-ple, and very few sites had 2 or 5 positive samples. Thusthe positive samples frequency adjusted to a negative bino-mial distribution, showing a patchiness distribution ofEPN.
Table 1 shows the abundance, recovery frequency andnumber of identified samples to species of EPN to eachenvironmental variable. Although EPN abundance didnot show significant differences among altitude ranges,the recovery frequency was significantly different(v2 = 28.410, df = 5, p = 0.001), recording the highestEPN presence at 501–800 m. Below 500 m of altitude therewere not recovered EPNs. Entomopathogenic nematodeabundance was not significantly different in annual averagetemperature or rainfall, although their recovery frequencywas significantly affected by temperature (v2 = 40.513,df = 7, p = 0.001) and rainfall (v2 = 25.038, df = 7,p = 0.003), recovering more nematodes from sites with arange of 9–12 �C, and rainfall ranging 400–700 mm. Thesoil type did not affect nematode occurrence, although sig-nificant differences were observed in the potential vegeta-tion series recovery frequency (v2 = 26.251, df = 9,p = 0.005), and EPN was not recovered from Spiraeo
obovaeta-Quercetum rotundifoliae S. and Rhamno lycioi-
dis-Quercetum cocciferae S. series. Nematode occurrencedoes not significantly affected by habitat type, but nema-todes were not recovered from scrub vegetation fromannual and perennial crop edges. Table 2 shows the abun-dance, recovery frequency and number of identified sam-ples to species of EPN to each physical–chemicalvariables. Soil texture and pH did not significantly affectEPNs occurrence, although they are easier isolated fromsoils with loam, sandy loam, silt, clay loam or loam/sandyloam textures and pH range 5.1–8.0. However the %humidity significantly affected nematode recovery fre-quency (v2 = 9.687, df = 3, p = 0.021), recovering few iso-lates from soil samples 610% humidity.
Fig. 2. EPNs sampling sites map in La Rioja (Northern Spain). d, sites with nematodes. , sites without nematodes. The numbered sites indicate thelocation of sites with nematodes.
R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139 129
3.2. Entomopathogenic nematodes species and their
ecological trends
Twenty-seven soil samples were positive for Steinerne-matids populations of EPNs in this survey, although 7 iso-lates could not be reproduced to be identified at the specieslevel. Twenty isolated were identified as: 11 Steinernema
feltiae (Filipjev), 7 S. carpocapsae (Weiser), 2 S. krausei
(Steiner). Morphological and biometrical characteristicsof isolates are in agreement with information given byAdams and Nguyen (2002). A PCR-RFLP analysis wascarried out to confirm the species identification (Fig. 3).All the S. feltiae isolates belonged to RFLP type A2 asshowed the profile obtained from ITS digestion with HinfIand RsaI enzymes (Hominick et al., 1997; Reid et al.,1997). The S. carpocapsae RFLP profile was the sameobtained by several authors (Cutler and Stock, 2003; Haziret al., 2003; Reid and Hominick, 1998; Reid et al., 1997;Stock et al., 1998) after the digestion with the AluI, EcoRI,HaeIII, HhaI, HinfI and RsaI enzymes. The S. kraussei
RFLP profile obtained from ITS digestion with AluI, HinfIy HhaI was the same recorded by Reid and Hominick(1998) and Reid et al. (1997), and EcoRI produced twobands as in Hominick et al. (1997).
Environmental and soil characteristics of positive sitesand samples for EPN species isolated in La Rioja areshowed in the Table 3. Steinernema feltiae was the mostabundant species representing 55% of positive samples
identified. It was highly distributed in sites ranging 639–1754 m altitude, 5–12 �C and 400–1100 mm annual averagerainfall, with soil types: Calcaric, Dystric and HumicCambisol, Calcaric and Dystric Regosol, Calcaric Pha-eozem, and Haplic Calcisol. The nematode was present inthe Oromediterranean region with Vaccinio myrtilli-
Junipereto nanae S. as potential vegetation series, in theSupramediterranean region with Ilici-Fageto S., Luzulo
forsteri-Querceto pyrenaicae S., Junipero oxycedri-Querceto
rotundifoliae S., Junipero thuriferae-Querceto rotundifoliaeS., Cephalanthero longifoliae-Querceto faginiae S. andAsparago acutifolii-Quercetum rotundifoliae S. series fromthe Mesomediterranean region. It was isolated from natu-ral areas and annual and perennial crop field edges withgrassland, scrub or woodland vegetation. The availablewater in soil samples ranged as 5.88–16.58, the pH as4.9–8.3, and the soil texture was sandy loam, loam orloam/sandy loam. Thus, S. feltiae can be considered as ahighly adaptable species.
Steinernema carpocapsae was finding in 35% of positivesamples associated to crop valley areas. It was recovered ingrassland habitats of annual crop edges 677–602 m alti-tude, 11 �C annual average temperature, and 500–400 mmannual average rainfall. The potential vegetation was Cep-
halanthero longifoliae-Querceto faginiae S. associated toSupramediterranean region, with soil types: CalcaricCambisol and Calcaric Phaeozem. Soil samples showedranges from pH 7.6 to 7.9 and available water from 11.01
Table 2Distribution of EPNs in La Rioja at different physical–chemical variables
Categories(total sites)
Abundance(%)
Recoveryfrequency (%)
No. of identifiedsamples to species
Texture soil type
Loam (48) 8.3 3.3 5a
Sandy Loam(22)
27.3 9.1 7a
Silt (4) 25.0 5.0 0Clay Loam
(12)16.7 11.7 7
Loamy Sand(2)
0 0 0
Silty ClayLoam (1)
0 0 0
Clay (3) 0 0 0Silt Loam (2) 0 0 0Loam/Slit
Loam (2)0 0 0
Loam/ClayLoam (2)
0 0 0
Loam/SandyLoam (2)
50.0 10.0 1
pH
65.0 (7) 14.3 8.6 2a
5.1–6.0 (13) 23.1 6.2 26.1–7.0 (7) 28.6 11.4 27.1–8.0 (50) 14.0 6.0 13a
P8.1 (23) 4.3 0.9 1
Moisture %
610% (16) 18.8 3.8 311–20% (54) 7.4 3.7 921–30% (20) 20.0 7.0 5a
P31% (10) 30.0 14.0 3a
a Presence of two EPN species in the same site, in different samples.
Table 1Distribution of EPNs in La Rioja at different environmental variables
Categories(total sites)
Abundance(%)
Recoveryfrequency (%)
No. of identifiedsamples to species
Altitude (masl)
6500 (15) 0 0 —501–800 (42) 21.4 7.1 14801–1100 (33) 6.1 1.8 11101–1400 (4) 25.0 15.0 2a
1401–1700 (3) 33.3 26.7 2a
P1701 (3) 33.3 13.3 1
Annual averages temperature (�C)
66 (4) 50.0 30.0 3a
7 (7) 0 0 —8 (4) 0 0 —9 (9) 22.2 8.9 2a
10 (25) 12.0 2.4 311 (20) 25.0 11.0 1012 (20) 10.0 3.0 213 (11) 0 0 —
Annual averages rainfall (mm)
300 (9) 0 0 —400 (26) 7.7 4.6 6500 (28) 25.0 7.2 8600 (16) 6.3 1.3 1700 (6) 33.3 13.3 2a
800 (1) 0 0 —900 (8) 0 0 —P1000 (6) 33.3 20.0 3a
Soil typeb
1 (13) 23.1 4.6 32 (24) 8.3 5.0 4a
3 (15) 13.3 5.3 2a
4 (3) 0 0 —5 (3) 0 0 —6 (1) 0 0 —7 (3) 0 0 —8 (9) 22.2 13.3 69 (13) 7.7 1.5 110 (11) 27.3 10.9 311 (5) 20.0 4.0 1
Vegetation Serie typec
1 (2) 50.0 20.0 12 (7) 14.3 11.4 2a
3 (10) 10.0 2.0 04 (14) 21.4 8.6 4a
5 (10) 10.0 2.0 16 (15) 26.7 13.3 97 (9) 11.1 2.2 18 (2) 0 0 —9 (25) 08.0 1.6 210 (6) 0 0 —
Habitat typed
NG (5) 20.0 20.0 1NW (8) 12.5 10.0 2a
NWS (19) 10.0 4.0 1NSG (13) 7.7 1.5 0NS (7) 14.3 8.6 2a
AS (5) 0 0 —PS (5) 0 0 —ASG (12) 8.3 3.3 1AWS (5) 20.0 4.0 1PSG (6) 16.7 3.3 1
Table 1 (continued)
Categories(total sites)
Abundance(%)
Recoveryfrequency (%)
No. of identifiedsamples to species
AG (16) 25.0 11.3 9PG (8) 25.0 5.0 2
a Presence of two EPN species in the same site, in different samples.b Soil type code correspond with Fig. 1b.c Potential vegetation code correspond with Fig. 1a.d Abbreviations are corresponded with Natural (N), Annual crop edge
(A), Perennial crop edge (P), Grassland (G), Woodland (W), Scrub (S).
130 R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139
to 13.48. This species is remarkable for being isolated inagricultural clay loam soils with 30–32% clay content.
Steinernema kraussei was isolated from 2 soil samples,representing 10% of positive samples. It was found associ-ated to natural woodland and scrub habitat areas at 1115–1596 m altitude, 6–9 �C annual average temperature and700–1000 mm annual average rainfall. It was associatedto potential vegetation Ilici-Fageto S. and Luzulo forsteri-Querceto pyrenaicae S. from Supramediterranean region.The soil types were Calcaric Cambisol and Dystric Camb-isol respectively. The pH was higher, ranging from slightlybasic (7.8) to acid (4.9), 13.09 and 11.07 of available water,and soil texture were loam and sandy loam, respectively.
Fig. 3. RFLP-PCR analysis of Steinernematid species from La Rioja, digested with nine restriction enzymes in a 2% (w/v) TBE buffered agarose gel. M1marker 1 kb ladder (band sizes 10,000–500 base pairs) and M2 marker 100 bp ladder (band sizes 1000–80 base pairs). (a) RFLP-PCR S. feltiae type. (b)RFLP-PCR S. carpocapsae type. (c) RFLP-PCR S. kraussei type.
R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139 131
Four association groups were established between EPNstrains occurrence and altitude, annual average tempera-ture and rainfall, potential vegetation series, habitat andsoil type (Fig. 4a). Strains S. feltiae 88A and S. kraussei
88C strains were included in group 1, isolated from a nat-ural woodland habitats at 1115 m altitude, 9 �C annualaverage temperature, 700 mm annual average rainfall, Dys-tric Cambisol soil type and Luzulo forsteri-Querceto pyre-
naicae S. as potential vegetation type. Group 2 includedby 58C of S. kraussei, and 66 and 58A of S. feltiae strains,which were recovered at high altitude (1569–1754 m) innatural grassland and woodland habitats, 5–6 �C annualaverage temperature and 1000–1100 mm annual average
rainfall. The potential vegetation was representative ofOromediterranean (Vaccinio myrtilli-Junipereto nanae S.)and Supramediterranean (Ilici-Fageto S.) regions and soiltypes were Dystric Regosol and Calcaric Cambisol. Group3 is included by S. carpocapsae 98 strain and S. feltiae 23,38 and 75 strains. The strains were isolated at 677–699 maltitude 10–12 �C annual average temperature and 400–500 annual average rainfall from annual and perennial cropedges with grassland and woodland-scrub habitats. Theassociated potential vegetation types were Cephalanthero
longifoliae-Querceto faginiae S., Junipero thuriferae-Quer-ceto rotundifoliae S., Asparago acutifolii-Quercetum rotun-
difoliae S, and soil types were Haplic Calcisol and
Tab
le3
En
viro
nm
enta
lan
dso
ilch
arac
teri
stic
sfr
om
po
siti
vesi
tes
and
sam
ple
sfo
rE
NP
spec
ies
Sp
ecie
s(s
trai
n/
iso
late
d)
+S
ites
/+sa
mp
les
Alt
itu
de
(mas
l)T
emp
erat
ure
(�C
)R
ain
fall
(mm
)V
eget
atio
nty
pea
Hab
itat
bS
oil
typ
ecA
vail
able
wat
erp
H% S
and
%S
ilt
%C
lay
Tex
ture
typ
e
S.
felt
iae
(11/
11)
(1/1
)17
545
1100
1N
G10
16.6
6.6
5344
3S
and
yL
oam
(1/1
)15
696
1000
2N
W2
13.9
7.8
4043
17L
oam
(1/1
)11
159
700
4N
S3
11.8
4.9
5536
9S
and
yL
oam
(1/1
)81
212
500
4N
WS
109.
15.
355
369
San
dy
Lo
am(1
/1)
785
1060
04
AW
1110
.78.
340
4515
Lo
am(1
/1)
699
1050
09
PG
15.
97.
970
1812
San
dy
Lo
am(1
/1)
695
1240
09
AW
S1
9.1
5.7
5433
13S
and
yL
oam
(1/1
)68
611
500
7P
G1
8.6
7.8
5237
11L
oam
/S
and
yL
oam
(1/1
)65
111
500
6A
SG
1110
.56.
537
4518
Lo
am(1
/1)
650
1050
05
PS
G8
8.1
7.7
4940
11L
oam
(1/1
)63
911
500
6A
G9
7.6
7.1
5837
5S
and
yL
oam
S.
kra
uss
ei(2
/2)
(1/1
)15
696
1000
2N
W2
13.1
7.8
4043
17L
oam
(1/1
)11
159
700
4N
S3
11.1
4.9
5536
9S
and
yL
oam
S.
carp
oca
psa
e
(2/7
)(1
/5)
677
1150
06
AG
211
.07.
927
4132
Cla
yL
oam
(1/2
)60
211
400
6A
G8
13.5
7.6
2644
30C
lay
Lo
am
aP
ote
nti
alve
geta
tio
nco
de
corr
esp
on
dw
ith
Fig
.1a
.b
Hab
itat
cod
eco
rres
po
nd
edw
ith
Tab
le1.
cS
oil
typ
eco
de
corr
esp
on
dw
ith
Fig
.1b
.
Fig. 4. Hierarchical cluster analysis between EPN species occurrence andenvironmental, and soil type variables. (a) Environmental variables(altitude, annual mean temperature and rainfall, potential vegetationseries, habitat and soil type). (b) Physical–chemical soil variables(available water, pH, and percentage of sand, silt and clay. Strain codenumber in blood, corresponded with S. kraussei strain, underlined, with S.
carpocapsae and normal, with S. feltiae.
132 R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139
Calcaric Cambisol. The group 4 include 6 strains: S. carpo-
capsae 96 strain and S. feltiae 17, 37, 63, 91 and 100 strains,which were recovered in natural woodland-scrub habitatand in annual and perennial crop edges of grassland, wood-land, scrub-grassland and woodland-scrub habitats, rang-ing their altitude, annual average temperature andrainfall as: 602–812 m, 10–12 �C and 400–600 mm,respectively. The potential vegetation types were Luzuloforsteri-Querceto pyrenaicae S., Junipero oxycedri-Querceto
rotundifoliae S. and Cephalanthero longifoliae-Querceto
faginiae S. and soil types Calcaric Phaeozem, CalcaricRegosol, Dystric Regosol and Humic Cambisol.
Fig. 4b shows the dendrogram which presents theassociation between EPN strain occurrence and the physi-cal–chemical soil variables (available water, pH, and per-centage of sand, silt and clay). Steinernema feltiae 66 and23 strains are regarded as groups A and B out of range,both groups were finding in sandy loam soil texture, pH
Fig. 5. Hierarchical cluster analysis between EPN species and biologicaldata of virulence (days to dead larvae and percentage of larval mortality),days to JIs emergence and reproductive potential. Strain code number inblood, corresponded with S. kraussei strain, in underlined, with S.
carpocapsae and normal, with S. feltiae.
R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139 133
6.6 and 7.9, but with very different available water content:16.58 and 5.88. The S. kraussei 58C, S. carpocapsae 96 and98, and S. feltiae 58A, 63 and 100 strains were joining ingroup 1. The pH appeared ranging 6.5–8.3 and availablewater from 10.53 to 13.90. Steinernema feltiae and S. kraus-
sei strains were isolated from loamy soils with 15–18% claycontent; however, S. carpocapsae was isolated from clayloam soils with high clay content (30–32%). The group 2include S. kraussei 88C and S. feltiae 17, 23, 37, 38, 66,75, 88A and 91 strains. They were isolated from soils withpH range 4.9–7.8 and 7.58–11.77 of available water con-tent, being the soil texture loam, sandy loam, and loam/sandy loam with a 5–13% clay content.
3.3. Virulence, infection cycle length and infective juveniles
production of entomopathogenic nematode native strains
The bioassay results carried out with native strains areshown in Table 4. The virulence was assessed as percentageof larval mortality and time to die larvae from nematodeinfection. The virulence was very similar and significantdifferences were not observed among strains, mortality per-centage (86.25–97.62%) and days to dead larvae (1.94–2.00days). Significant differences were observed in the infectioncycle length, that was measured from larval exposure to JIsemergence (F = 19.635, gl = 12, p = 0.000). The S. feltiae
cycle ranged from 8.44 to 9.84 days, 10.23–10.36 days forS. carpocapsae and 12.83 days for the S. kraussei 88C strainwhich is the largest infection cycle. Significant differenceswere also observed in the reproductive potential(F = 33.050, gl = 12, p = 0.000). The S. carpocapsae 96and 98 strains showed the highest values with 626.29 and831.72 IJs/mg larvae, respectively, in S. feltiae these valueranged from 124.94 to 444.23 IJs/mg larvae, showingS. kraussei 88C strain the lowest reproductive potential84.07 IJs/mg larvae. Fig. 5 shows the dendogram of theassociation groups hierarchical cluster analysis among
Table 4Biological characteristics1,2 of native entomoathogenic nematode isolated based
Species Straincode
Days to deadlarvae
% Larvmortali
S. feltiae 17 1.94 ± 0.035 90.90 ±23 2.00 ± 0.000 88.83 ±37 2.00 ± 0.206 90.67 ±38 2.00 ± 0.000 95.22 ±58A 2.00 ± 0.000 90.91 ±63 2.00 ± 0.000 97.62 ±66 2.00 ± 0.000 86.25 ±75 2.00 ± 0.000 90.73 ±91 2.00 ± 0.000 91.65 ±100 2.00 ± 0.022 95.29 ±
S. kraussei 88C 2.00 ± 0.000 94.20 ±
S. carpocapsae 96 2.00 ± 0.000 95.73 ±98 2.00 ± 0.000 90.91 ±
1 Values are means ± SE.2 Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly differe
EPN strains and the biological variables. The group 1include by S. feltiae 23, 37, 58A, 66, 75, 91 and 100 strainswith the following ranging values: 1.98–2.00 days to deadlarvae, 86.25–95.29% larval mortality, 8.28–9.84 days fromthe infection cycle, and 124.94–362.20 IJs/mg larvae for thereproductive potential. The group 2 includes S. feltiae 38strain (with 2.00 days to dead larvae, 95.22% larval mortal-ity, 9.91 days from the infection cycle and 444.23 IJs/mglarvae) and S. carpocapsae 96 and 98 strains (with 2.00days to dead larvae, 95.73–90.91% larval mortality,10.36–10.23 days from the infection cycle and 626.24–831 IJs/mg larvae). Three strains were out of range: Aand C were S. feltiae 63 and 17 strains, respectively, andvalues of 2.00–1.94 days to dead larvae, 97.62–90.90% lar-val mortality, 8.77–9.57 days from the infection cycle, and
on data recorded from Galleria mellonella larvae infected with 75 JIs/cm2
alty
Days from infectionto JIs emergence
Reproductive potentialno. JIs/mg larvae
0.236 9.57 ± 0.211 bcd 196.73 ± 24.286 bcd1.426 9.84 ± 0.284 cd 225.39 ± 24.286 abcd4.864 9.33 ± 0.185 abcd 261.77 ± 20.413 bcd0.248 9.91 ± 0.232 d 444.23 ± 21.748 e5.248 9.76 ± 0.285 cd 124.94 ± 21.015 ab1.374 8.77 ± 0.164 abc 301.56 ± 44.752 cde4.087 8.44 ± 0.284 ab 362.20 ± 40.389 de2.973 8.28 ± 0.141 a 350.97 ± 26.142 de0.202 9.57 ± 0.285 cd 268.20 ± 34.509 bcd0.710 9.62 ± 0.349 cd 166.01 ± 27.316 abc
3.833 12.83 ± 0.356 e 84.07 ± 9.243 a
0.159 10.36 ± 0.181 d 626.24 ± 61.180 f5.248 10.23 ± 0.159 d 831.72 ± 63.003 g
nt, Tukey test at p 6 0.05.
134 R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139
301.56–196.78 IJs/mg larvae; and B with S. kraussei 88Cstrain with values of 2.00 days to dead larvae, 94.20% lar-val mortality, 12.83 days from the infection cycle, and84.07 IJs/mg larvae.
4. Discussion
The EPNs abundance, distribution and habitat prefer-ence are related to host-parasite relationships, environmen-tal conditions and soil characteristics (Barbercheck, 1992;Mracek et al., 2005; Nielsen and Philipsen, 2003; Peters,1996; Puza and Mracek, 2005). The study of EPN occur-rence, distribution and biology taking into account theenvironmental and soil characteristics in a geographicalarea provide a base knowledge to increase biological con-trol program efficacy in those region. Few studies had beencarried out on this topic through the world, although Gar-cıa del Pino and Palomo (1996a) began these kind of stud-ies in our country in Catalonia, it is the first time that EPNare bio-ecological studied in La Rioja, an important agri-cultural region in Spain with an increasing organic produc-tion (MAPA, 2005).
Over one month (March–April), 500 soil samples werecollected in order to avoid seasonal fluctuations in climaticconditions of the Mediterranean region, which affect EPNspopulations (Garcıa del Pino and Palomo, 1997) andensure a high presence of EPNs (Mracek, 1980; Puza andMracek, 2005; Rio and Cameron, 2000). The positive sam-ples distribution can be adjusted to a negative binomial dis-tribution. This natural patchiness distribution has beenrecorded by other authors (Boag et al., 1992; Bohan,2000; Cabanillas and Raulston, 1994; Campbell et al.,1998; Stuart and Gaugler, 1994). This large variabilityEPN occurrence can be also increased due to insect hostaggregations (Mracek and Becvar, 2000). Consequently,the EPNs occurrence in soil samples can be variable in dif-ferent surveys, ranging the recovery frequency from 0.7 to70.1% (Bruck, 2004; Mracek and Becvar, 2000). PreviousEPN surveys carried out in Spain showed a variable recov-ery frequency, in Catalonia 3.3% (De Doucet and Gabarra,1994) and 11.9% (Garcıa del Pino, 1994), in Galicia 26%, inMallorca Island 6.5%, and in Canary Islands 0.66–11%(Garcıa del Pino, 2005). The recovery frequency valuerecorded in La Rioja (5.4%) was also similar to some valuesobtained in other Mediterranean countries: Greece: 5%(Menti et al., 1997), Egypt: 10% (Shamseldean and Abd-Elgawad, 1994), Mediterranean Turkey region: 5,8% (Kep-enekci, 2002), Italy: 5% (Ehlers et al., 1991), 14% (Tarascoand Triggiani, 1997), and 6% or 15.5% from pinewood orholm-oak wood habitat, respectively (Triggiani and Taras-co, 2000). In La Rioja was recorded a 14% of EPNs abun-dance being this value similar to 12.2% obtained in theUnited Kingdon by Gwynn and Richardson (1996),although in most surveys are recorded higher abundancevalues: 23.0% in Catalonia (Spain) (Garcıa del Pino,1994; Garcıa del Pino and Palomo, 1996a), 23.7% in Ore-gon (USA) (Liu and Berry, 1995), 28.5% in Southeastern
USA (Shapiro-Ilan et al., 2003), 20.3% in Indonesia (Grif-fin et al., 2000) and 33% in Hungria, Estonia and Denmark(Griffin et al., 1999) and sometimes the abundance canraise to 92.3% as in New Jersey (USA) (Stuart and Gau-gler, 1994).
Environmental and soil characteristics had not signifi-cant affect on EPNs abundance; however, altitude, temper-ature, rainfall, potential vegetation series and soil humidityshowed statistical differences in their recovery frequency.Similar effect was recorded for altitude, temperature andrainfall (Constant et al., 1998; Garcıa del Pino and Palomo1996a; Mracek et al., 2005). The soil characteristics alsoinfluence the EPN occurrence being important the moisture(Garcıa del Pino and Palomo, 1996a) and texture (Black-shaw, 1988), producing more EPN isolations from sandysoils (Hazir et al., 2003; Liu and Berry, 1995; Ruedaet al., 1993). Mracek et al. (2005) suggested that clay con-tent of heavy soils could difficult the EPNs movement,affecting their recovery from soil samples. The pH alsohas importance in the EPNs occurrence as reported byConstant et al. (1998) and Stock et al. (1999). The potentialvegetation series has a significant effect nematode distribu-tion and none EPN was recovered from series 8, Spiraeo
obovaeta-Quercetum rotundifolia S., and 10, Rhamno lycioi-
dis-Quercetum cocciferae. Although the habitat did notaffect significantly the nematode occurrence, none EPNwas recovered from soils with scrub vegetation fromannual and perennial crop edges. Moreover, there weremore positive samples in human manipulated habitats thanin natural ones. This trend could be statistically improvedincreasing the sampling effort in the studied sites, betterthan increase the number soil samples per site (Stocket al., 1999). Garcıa del Pino and Palomo (1996a) and Mra-cek and Webster (1993) also observed similar trend, sug-gesting that habitat preference is related to insect hostdistribution. Natural areas have large insect diversity thanagricultural areas, although their population levels arehardly controlled by natural enemies. In highly intensivemonoculture areas can produce outbreaks of insect pestspecies susceptible to EPNs attack, which could leave thecrop field looking for shelter in the crop edge. Thus inedges the EPN population can increase more easily enhanc-ing their recovery frequency from soil samples, so that thecrop field edges could be a good natural stock for EPNspopulations.
In this survey, only the genus Steinernenma (Filipjev)was recovered. It could be probably due to the low preva-lence of Heterohabditis genus as compared with Stein-
ernenma genus, which is adapted to many environments(Hominick, 2002). This fact can be observed through Med-iterranean area too: in Catalonia (Northeast Spain) Garciadel Pino and Palomo (1996a) recorded 1.3% positive sitesfor Heterohabditis vs 22% for Steinernema, in Italy (Taras-co and Triggiani, 1997) 5.3% Heterohabditis vs 8.5% forSteinernema, in Turkey (Hazir et al., 2003) 0.7% Hetero-
habditis vs 1.4% for Steinernema. However, in some cases,when many sampling sites are adjacent to the sea, Hetero-
R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139 135
habditis genus has higher prevalence than Steinernenma
genus: 2.5% Heterohabditis vs 1.4% for Steinernema in theAzores islands (Rosa et al., 2000), 17% Heterohabditis vs
9% for Steinernema in Oregon (USA) (Liu and Berry,1995).
In the distribution surveys sometimes several isolates arenot identified to species level due to they cannot be repro-duced successfully in the laboratory (Blackshaw, 1988; Sali-nas, 2002). In this study were identified 15 strains of 3 speciesfrom 20 Steinernematids isolates, although another 7 isolatescould not be identified to species level. Our survey recovered3 steinernematids species from 500 soil samples of 100 sam-pling sites, being this recovery value similar to another sur-veys (Hominick, 2002). In Spain, Garcıa del Pino andPalomo (1996a) also isolated 3 steinernematids species from750 soil samples of 150 catalonian sites, although De Doucetand Gabarra (1994) isolated 2 Steinernematids species from60 soil samples of 1 site from these region. Similar valueswere recorded from other Mediterranean regions. Triggianiand Tarasco (2000) identified 4 EPN species from 203 Italiansites, in Turkey Kepenekci (2002) identified 2 species from 52samples of 15 sites but Hazir et al. (2003) only identified 3species from 1080 samples of 6 regions. The number of iden-tified species were very variable in others surveys, with arange to one to 13 species (Boag et al., 1992; Mracek et al.,2005; Spiridonov et al., 2004; Stock, 1995; Sturhan, 1999;Sturhan and Liskova, 1999).
In agreement with previous results obtained by Adamsand Nguyen (2002), Hominick et al. (1997), Reid et al.(1997), and Reid and Hominick (1998), Riojan steinerne-matids strains were identified as: 11 populatios of S. feltiae,2 of S. carpocapsae and 2 of S. kraussei. These species hadbeen previously isolated in our country, although also havebeen isolated S. affine, S. intermedium, S. arenarium, andsome isolates unidentified to species level of S. glasseri, S.
feltiae and S. bicornotum groups (Garcıa del Pino, 2005).S. feltiae was the most widely distributed species in La Riojaand this result is agreed with Garcıa del Pino (2005) obser-vations in other Spanish regions. Steinernema feltiae and S.
carpocapsae have a much extended distribution through theworld (Hominick, 2002). Peters (1996) suggested that thisfact could be due to these species are generalist and havea broad range of insect hosts. Studying the environmentaland soil characteristics related to distribution of these spe-cies in La Rioja, it was observed, in agreement with previ-ous results from Hominick’s revision (2002), that S. feltiaeshowed a broad distribution isolating it from fresh-humidhabitats to temperate-dry ones with grassland, scrub orwoodland vegetation from natural areas or crop field edges.The soil texture ranged from sandy to loam, a 5.88–16.58available water, and acid to basic pH. These data showthe high adaptability of this species, thus some of theirstrains, with a good virulence level against local insect pests,could be valuable to develop bioinsecticide products. Veryinteresting result were obtained with S. carpocapsae becauseboth strains were related to temperate crop field edges andheavy soils with a 30% of clay content. Mracek et al. (2005)
suggested that heavy soils decrease the nematode mobilityand thus it can affect their infectivity. Consequently, themost EPN strains used in biological control had been iso-lated from sandy soils (Griffin et al., 1991; Kung et al.,1990; Mracek et al., 2005), so the S. carpocapsae Riojanstrains could be of a great interest to produce commercialproducts to apply in heavy soils. Finally, in agreement withothers authors, S. kraussei showed a more restricted arearelated to Holartic distribution (Hominick, 2002; Mraceket al., 2005; Spiridonov et al., 2004; Stock et al., 2000)occurring in fresh-humid natural habitats with loam andsandy loam soil texture. In Spain, it was recovered fromCatalonian Pyrenees with similar habitat type (Garcıa delPino and Palomo, 1996b). In this survey, it was observedthat both S. kraussei and S. feltiae were isolated in the samesite, so it is recommended to use S. kraussei isolates for bio-insecticide development only if their virulence is higher thanS. feltiae isolates.
The bioassay carried out with Riojan strains showedthat they were highly virulent to G. mellonella larvae pro-ducing a 86.25–97.62% larval mortality in 1.94–2.00 daysafter 75 JIs/cm2 exposition. These results are in agreementwith several authors, although the dose used could changebetween assays. Caroli et al. (1996) observed a 100% of lar-val mortality in the S. feltiae UK strain using 168.4 IJs/cm2, reaching the same result after 12 h of 113 IJs/cm2
applications or 28.3 IJs/cm2 for 48 h (Ricci et al., 1996).Chen and Glazer (2005) observed that S. feltiae IS-6 strainfrom several storage mediums produced 100% larval mor-tality at 113 JIs/cm2. Our study did not showed statisticaldifferences for larval mortality percentage among Riojanstrains. However, Tarasco (1997) observed high intraspe-cific variability in the larval percentage mortality, rangingfrom 37.7 to 71.1%, after applying 3 IJs/ cm2 of ItalianS. feltiae strains. Simoes et al. (2000) observed that S.
carpocapsae Bretain strain was more virulent than AZ27strain, and Bretain strain has also a lethal time twentytimes lower than Az27. Mracek et al. (1999b), carryingout the bioassays at 10 �C, observed that an applicationof 2 JIs/cm2 S. kraussei Canadian strain produced a larvalmortality percentage as high as those produced by the Rio-jan S. kraussei 88C strain.
The days to complete the infection cycle were statisti-cally different among Riojan strains. The S. feltiae strainsranged from 8.44–9.84 days followed to S. carpocapsae
strains that ranged from 10.23 to 10.26 days, showing S.kraussei 88C strain the largest infection cycle with 12.83days. These results are in agreement with the usual timedescribed to the Steinernematid species (Garcıa del Pino,1994), although specific studies are not available yet. Thehigher reproductive potential was recorded by the S. carpo-
capsae 96 and 98 strains, which ranged from 626.29 to831.72 IJs/mg larvae, respectively. They were closed tothe values obtained by Dutky et al. (1964) and Wang andBedding (1996) with the S. carpocapsae DD-136 andLeningrado A24 strains, that produced approximately1000 IJs/mg larvae. However, Sandner and Stanuszek
136 R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139
(1971) observed a wide range among strains, producingsome of them 3091 IJs/mg larvae. The reproductivepotential of the S. feltiae Riojan strains ranged from124.74 to 444.23 IJs/mg larvae, which is into the valuesobserved to the S. feltiae UK strain (226.6–359.2 IJs/mglarvae) by Schirocki and Hague (1997). This is the first timethat the infection cycle length and reproductive potential ofS. kraussei is evaluated. The S. kraussei Riojan 88C strainshowed the largest infection cycle and the lowest reproduc-tive potential recorded in the present study. As the naturaldistribution of S. kraussei is Holartic (Stock et al., 2000),and their occurrence is related to cool-temperate conditions(Hominick, 2002; Spiridonov et al., 2004), thus it ispossible that the normal development of the S. kraussei88C strain could be slow down, due to the bioassay wascarried out at 22 �C. A study using lower temperaturewould provide more accurate information about the infec-tion cycle length and reproductive potential of this species.The best results obtained from this study were for the S.
feltiae strains, adapted to a broad range of environmentaland soil characteristics, proposing to 38 and 63 strainsfor bioinsecticide development. Steinernema carpocapsae96 and 98 strains were related to temperate conditionsand heavy soils, so it could be interesting to explore theirutility as biological control agents. More bioassays withS. kraussei 88C carried out with their optimal temperaturewill be developed to assess their utility as bioinsecticide.
The results of this survey extend the knowledge onEPNs in Spain and provided some ecological observationspotentially useful to develop new commercial strainsadapted to Mediterranean environment for biologicalcontrol of insects. Future studies on the virulence of indig-enous EPNs against local insect pests will be developed.
Acknowledgments
We thank to Antonio Bello and Avelino Garcıa-Alvarezfor their comments on the manuscript and Ana Piedra Bue-na for their English corrections; Milagros Herrera forassisting in the soil collection; Ruben Blanco-Perez forhis help is the EPNs biometric measurements; OctavioCedenilla and Margarita Perez-Penasco for the soil analy-sis and Manuel Fernandez for soil samples preparation.This research was supported by funds of: Spanish Scienceand Technology Ministry (Grants: REN2002-02550 andRTA3-004-C4-4), Riojan Sudies Institute, Consejerıa deEducacion, Cultura, Juventud y Deportes del Gobiernode La Rioja (Grant: 2002/3461) and Union de Agricultoresy Ganaderos de La Rioja-Coordinadora de Agricultores yGanaderos (UAGR-COAG) (Grant: 2003/672). We thankthe Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte for theFPU fellowship.
References
Abbott, W.S., 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of aninsecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18, 265–276.
Adams, B.J., Nguyen, K.B., 2002. Taxonomy and systematics. In:Gaugler, R. (Ed.), Entomopathogenic Nematology. CABI Publishing,Wallinford, UK, pp. 1–33.
Adams, B.J., Fodor, A., Koppenhofer, H.S., Stackenbrandt, E., Stock,S.P., Klein, M.G., 2006. Biodiversity and systematic of nematode-bacterium entomopathogens. Biol. Control 38, 4–21.
Barbercheck, M.E., 1992. Effect of soil physical factors on biologicalcontrol agents of soil insect pests. Fla. Entomol. 75, 539–548.
Bathon, H., 1996. Impact of entomopathogenic nematodes on nontargethosts. Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 6, 421–443.
Bedding, R.A., Akhurst, R.J., 1975. A simple technique for the detectionof insect parasitic rhabditid nemadodes in soil. Nematologica 21, 109–110.
Bednarek, A., 1998. The agricultural system, as a complex factor, effectsthe population of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steiner-nematidae) in the soil. IOBC Bull. 21, 155–216.
Blackshaw, R.P., 1988. A survey of insect parasitic nematodes in NorthenIreland. Ann. Appl. Biol. 113, 561–565.
Boag, B., Nielson, R., Gordon, S., 1992. Distribution and prevalence ofthe entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema feltiae in Scotland. Ann.Appl. Biol. 121, 355–360.
Boemare, N., 2002. Biology, taxomony and systematics of Xenorhabdus
and Phtorhabdus. In: Gaugler, R. (Ed.), Entomopathogenic Nematol-ogy. CABI Publishing, Wallinford, UK, pp. 35–56.
Boemare, N., Givandan, A., Brehelin, M., Laumond, C., 1997. Symbioisisand pathogenicity of nematode-bacterium complexes. Symbioisis 22,21–24.
Bohan, D.A., 2000. Spatial structuring and frecuency distribution of thenematode Steinernema feltiae Filipjev. Parasitology 121, 417–425.
Bruck, D.J., 2004. Natural occurrence of entomopathogens in PacificNorthwest nursery soil and their virulence to the black vine weevil,Otiorhynchus sulcatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environ.Entomol. 33, 1335–1343.
Burnell, A.M., Stock, S.P., 2000. Heterorhabdits, Steinernema and theirbacterial symbionts-lethal pathogens of insect. Nematology 2, 31–42.
Cabanillas, H.E., Raulston, J.R., 1994. Evaluation of the spatial patternof Steinernema riobravis in corn plots. J. Nematol. 26, 25–31.
Campbell, J.F., Orza, G., Yoder, F., Lewis, E.E., Gaugler, R., 1998.Spatial and temporal distribution of endemic and released entomo-pathogenic nematode populations in turfgrass. Entomol. Exp. Appl.86, 1–11.
Campos-Herrera, R., Escuer, M., Robertson, L., Gutierrez, C., 2006.Morphological and ecological characterization of Steinernema feltiae
(Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) Rioja strain, isolated from Bibio
hortulanus (Diptera: Bibionidae) in Spain. J. Nematol. 38, 68–75.Caroli, L., Glazer, I., Glaugler, R., 1996. Entomopathogenic nematode
infectivity assay: comparison of penetration rate into different host.Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 6, 227–233.
Chen, S., Glazer, I., 2005. A novel method for long-term storage of theentomopathogenic nematode Steinernema feltiae at room temperature.Biol. Control 32, 104–110.
Constant, P., Marchay, L., Fischer-Le Saux, M., Briand-Panoma, S.,Mauleon, H., 1998. Natural occurrence of entomopathogenic nema-todes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) in Gua-dalupe islands. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 21, 667–672.
Cutler, G.C., Stock, S.P., 2003. Steinernema websteri sp. n. (Rhabditida:Steinernematidae), a new entomopathogenic nematode from China.Nematol. Mediter. 31, 215–224.
De Doucet, M.M.A., Gabarra, R., 1994. On the occurrence of Steiner-
nema glasseri (Steiner, 1929) (Steinernematidae) and Heterorhabditis
bacteriophora Poinar, 1976 (Heterorhabditidae) in Catalogne, Spain.Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 17, 441–443.
Duchaufour, P., 1975. Manual de Edafologıa. Toray-Masson, Barcelona.Dutky, S.R., Thompson, J.V., Cantwell, G.E., 1964. A technique for mass
propagation of the DD-136 nematode. J. Insect Pathol. 6, 417–422.Ehlers, R.U., Hokkanen, H.M.T., 1996. Insect control with non-endemic
entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema and Heterorhabditis spp.):conclusions and recommendations for a combined OECD and COST
R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139 137
workshop on scientific and regulatory policy issues. Biocontr. Sci.Technol. 6, 295–302.
Ehlers, R.U., Deseo, K.V., Stackebrandt, E., 1991. Identification ofSteinernema spp. (Nematoda) and their symbiotic bacteria Xenorhab-
dus spp. from Italian and German soils. Nematologica 37, 360–366.Garcıa del Pino, F., 1994. Los nematodos entomopatogenos (Rhabditida:
Steinernematidae y Heterorhabditidae) presentes en Cataluna y suutilizacion para el control biologico de insectos. PhD., UniversidadAutonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona.
Garcıa del Pino, F. 2005. Natural occurrence of entomopathogenicnematodes in Spain. In: MC-Meeting and Working Group 4thMeeting: Natural occurrence and evolution of entomopathogenicnematodes and Management Committee Meeting. Ceske Budejovice,The Czech Republic 14–17 Enero 2005.
Garcıa del Pino, F., Palomo, A., 1996a. Natural occurrence of entomo-pathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heteror-habditidae) in Spanish soils. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 68, 84–90.
Garcıa del Pino, F., Palomo, A., 1996b. Steinernema kraussei (Steiner,1923) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) from Spain. Nematropica 26,266–267.
Garcıa del Pino, F., Palomo, A., 1997. Temporal study of naturalpopulations of heterorhabditid an steinernematid nematodes inhorticultural crop soils. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 20, 473–480.
Gaugler, R., 2002. Entomopathogenic Nematology. CABI Publishing,Wallinford, UK.
Gaugler, R., Kaya, H.K., 1990. Entomopathogenic nematodes in biolog-ical control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl.
Government of La Rioja, 2001a. Mapa Isotermas. Temperatura MediaAnual. Comunidad Autonoma de La Rioja. Gobierno de La Rioja.Direccion General del Medio Natural. Area de Sistemas de Informa-cion Geografica. http://www.larioja.org/sig.
Government of La Rioja. 2001b. Mapa Isoyetas. Precipitaciones anuales.Comunidad Autonoma de La Rioja. Gobierno de La Rioja. DireccionGeneral del Medio Natural. Area de Sistemas de InformacionGeografica. http://www.larioja.org/sig.
Gomez, L., Campos, R., Sanchez, L., Rodrıguez, M., 2004. Metodorapido de preparacion de nematodos entomopatogenos para laobservacion en microscopio optico. Rev. Prot. Veg. 19, 67–68.
Griffin, C.T., Chaerani, R., Fallon, D., Reid, A.P., Downes, M.J., 2000.Occurrence and distribution of the entomopathogenic nematodesSteinernema spp. and Heterorhabditis indica in Indonesia. J. Helmin-thol. 74, 143–150.
Griffin, C.T., Moore, J.F., Downes, M.J., 1991. Occurrence of insectparasitic nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae) in theRepublic of Ireland. Nematologica 37, 92–100.
Griffin, C.T., Dix, I., Joyce, S.A., Burnell, A.M., Downes, M.J., 1999.Isolation and Characterization of Heterorhabditis spp. (Nematoda:Heterorhabditidae) from Hungary, Estonia and Denmark. Nematol-ogy 1, 321–332.
Guerra, A., Monturiol, F., 1970. Mapas de suelos de las provincias deZaragoza, Huesca y Logrono. Escala 1:250.000. Consejo Superior deInvestigaciones Cientıficas. Patronatos ‘‘Alonso Herrera’’ y ‘‘JoseMarıa Cuadradro’’ pp. 68.
Gwynn, R.L., Richardson, P.N., 1996. Incidence of entomopathogenicnematodes in soil samples collected from Scotland, England andWales. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 19, 427–431.
Hazir, S., Keskin, N., Stock, S.P., Kaya, H., Ozcan, S., 2003. Diversityand distribution of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Stein-ernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) in Turkey. Biodivers. Conserv.12, 375–386.
Hominick, W.M., 2002. Biogeography. In: Gaugler, R. (Ed.), Entomo-pathogenic Nematology. CABI Publishing, Wallinford, UK, pp. 115–143.
Hominick, W.M., Briscoe, B.R., Garcıa del Pino, F., Heng, J., Hunt, D.J.,Kozodoy, E., Mracek, Z., Nguyen, K.B., Reid, A.P., Spiridonov, S.,Stock, S.P., Sturhan, D., Waturu, C., Yoshida, M., 1997. Biosyste-matics of entomopathogenic nematodes: currens status, protocols anddefinitions. J. Helminthol. 71, 271–298.
Hominic, K.W.M., Reid, A.P., Boham, A.P., Briscoe, B.R., 1996.Entomopathogenic nematodes: biodiversity, geographical distributionand the convention on biological diversity. Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 6,317–331.
Hozzank, A., Wegensteiner, R., Waitzbauer, W., Burnell, A., Mracek, Z.,Zimmermann, G., 2003. Investigations on the occurrence of entomo-pathogenic fungi and entomoparasitic nematodes in soils from lowerAustria. Bull. OILB/SROP 26, 77–80.
Iraki, N., Salah, N., Sansour, M.A., Segal, D., Glazer, I., Johnigk, S.A.,Hussein, M.A., Ehlers, R.U., 2000. Isolation and characterization oftwo entomopathogenic nematodes strains, Heterorhabditis indica
(Nematoda, Rhabditida), from the West Bank, Palestinian Territories.J. Appl. Entomol. 124, 375–380.
Ivanova, T.I., Danilov, L., Ivakhnenko, O.A., 2000. Distribution ofentomopathogenic nematodes of the families Steinernematidae andHeterorhabditidae in Russia and their morphological characteristics.Parazitologiya 34, 323–334.
Kaya, H., Gaugler, R., 1993. Entomopathogenic nematodes. Ann. Rev.Entomol. 38, 181–206.
Kepenekci, I., 2002. Entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida) in theMediterranean region of Turkey. Nematol. Mediter. 30, 13–15.
Kung, S.P., Gaugler, R., Kaya, H.K., 1990. Soil type and entomopatho-genic nematode persistance. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 55, 401–406.
Liu, J., Berry, R.E., 1995. Natural distribution of entomopathogenicnematodes (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae) inOregon Soils. Biol. Control. 24, 159–163.
Ludwig, J.A., Reynolds, J.F., 1988. Statistical Ecology: A Primer onMethods and Computing. John Wiley, NY.
Lynch, L.D., Thomas, M.B., 2000. Non target effects in the biocontrol ofinsects with insects, nematodes and microbial agents: the evidence.Biocontr. News Inform. 21, 117N–130N.
MAPA, 1975. Metodos Oficiales de Analisis. Ministerio de Agricultura.Madrid.
MAPA, 2005. Estadısticas 2005. Agricultura Ecologica Espana. Ministe-rio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentacion, p. 57. http://www.agroec-ologia.net/estadisticas%20ae/estadisticas%20ae%202005.pdf.
Menti, H., Wright, D.J., Perry, R.N., 1997. Desiccation survival ofpopulations of nematodes Steinernema feltiae and Heterorhabditis
megidis from Greece and the UK. J. Helmimthol. 71, 41–46.Midituri, J.S., Waeyenberge, L., Moens, M., 1997. Natural distribution of
entomopathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditidae and Steinernemati-dae) in Belgian soils. Russian J. Nematol. 5, 55–65.
Millar, L.C., Barbercheck, M.E., 2001. Interaction between endemic andintroduced entomopathogenic nematodes in conventional-till and notill corn. Biol. Control 22, 235–245.
Mracek, Z., 1980. The use of ‘‘Galleria trap’’ for obtaining nematodeparasites of insect in Czechoslovakia (Nematoda, Steinernematidae).Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov. 77, 378–382.
Mracek, Z., Becvar, S., 2000. Insect aggregations and entomopathogenicnematode occurrence. Nematology 2, 297–301.
Mracek, Z., Webster, J.M., 1993. Survey of Heterorhabditidae andSteinernematidae (Rhabditida, Nematoda) in Western Canada. J.Nematol. 25, 710–717.
Mracek, Z., Becvar, S., Kindlannd, P., 1999a. Survey of entomopatho-genic nematodes from the families Steinernematidae and Heterorhab-ditidae (Nematoda: Rhabditida) in the Czech Republic. FoliaParasitol. 46, 145–148.
Mracek, Z., Becvar, S., Kindlmann, P., Webster, J.M., 1999b. Factorsinfluencing the infectivity of Canadian isolate of Steinernema kraussei
(Nematoda: Steinernematidae) at low temperature. J. Invertebr.Pathol. 73, 243–247.
Mracek, Z., Becvar, S., Kindlmann, P., Jersakova, J., 2005. Habitatpreference for entomopathogenic nematodes, their insect hosts andnew faunistic records for the Czech Republic. Biol. Control 34, 27–37.
Mracek, Z., Sturhan, D., Reid, A., 2003. Steinernema weiseri n. sp.(Rhabditida, Steinernematidae), a new entomopathogenic nematodefrom Europe. Syst. Parasitol. 56, 37–47.
138 R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139
Nguyen, K. B., 2003. ITS sequence of Steinernema cut by 22 enzymes withnumbers of cuts and fragments lengths. In http://kbn.ifas.ufl.edu/50seqcut.htm.
Nielsen, O., Philipsen, H., 2003. Danish surveys on insects naturallyinfected with entomopathogenic nematodes. Bull. OILB/SROP 26,131–136.
Peters, A., 1996. The natural host range of Steinernema and Heteror-
habditis spp. and their impact on insect populations. Biocontr. Sci.Technol. 6, 389–402.
Puza, V., Mracek, Z., 2005. Seasonal dynamics of entomoapthogenicnematodes of the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis as aresponse to abiotic factors and abundance of insect hosts. J. Invertebr.Pathol. 89, 116–122.
Reid, A.P., Hominick, W.H., 1998. Molecular taxonomy of Steinernema
by RFLP analysis of ITS region of the ribosomal DNA repeat unit. In:Abad, P., Burnell, A., Laumond, C., Boemare, N.E., Coudert, F.(Eds.). Genetic and Molecular Biology of Entomopathogenic Nema-todes. COST 819 Brussels, Belgium, European Communities, pp. 87–93.
Reid, A.P., Hominick, W.M., Briscoe, B.R., 1997. Molecular taxonomyand phylogeny of entomopathogenic nematode species (Rhabditida:Steinernematidae) by RFLP analysis of ITS region of the ribosomalDNA repeat unit. Syst. Parasitol. 37, 187–193.
Ricci, M., Glazer, I., Campbell, J.F., Gaugler, R., 1996. Comparison ofbioassays to measure virulence of different entomopathogenic nema-todes. Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 6, 235–245.
Rio, R.V.M., Cameron, E.A., 2000. Heterorhabditis bacteriophora sea-sonal dynamics and distribution in a sugar maple, Acer saccharum. J.Invertebr. Pathol. 75, 36–40.
Rivas-Martınez, S., 1987. Memoria de las series de vegetacion de Espana.Mapa 8: Burgos. Mapa de las series de vegetacion de Espana. SerieTecnica. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentacion. ICONA.
Rivas-Martınez, S., Fernandez-Gonzalez, F., Loidi, J., Lousa, M.,Penas, A., 2001. Syntaxonomical Checklist of vascular plantcommunities of Spain and Portugal to association level. ItineraGeobotanica 14, 5–341.
Rivas-Martınez, S., Dıaz, T.E., Fernandez-Gonzalez, F., Izco, J., Loidi, J.,Lousa, M., Penas, A., 2002. Vascular plant communities of Spain andPortugal. Addenda to the syntaxonomical checklist of 2001. ItineraGeobotanica 15, 5–432.
Rosa, J.S., Bonifassi, F., Amaral, J., Lacey, L.A., Simoes, N., Laumond,C., 2000. Natural occurrence of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhab-ditida: Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae) in the Azores. J. Nema-tol., 215–222.
Rueda, L.M., Osawaru, S.O., Georgi, L.L., Harrison, R.E., 1993. Naturaloccurrence of entomogenous nematodes in Tennessee nursery soils. J.Nematol. 25, 181–188.
Salinas, S.H., 2002. Entomopathogenic nematodes in Norwegian forestsoil. Nematology 2, 197.
Sandner, H., Stanuszek, S., 1971. Comparative research on the effective-ness and production of Neoaplectana carpocapsae s.1. Zesz. Probl.Post. Nauk. Roln. 121, 209–226.
Schirocki, A.G., Hague, G.M., 1997. The effect of selective culture ofSteinernema feltiae at low temperature on establishment, pathogenic-ity, reproduction and size of infective juveniles. Nematologica 43, 481–489.
Shamseldean, M.M., Abd-Elgawad, M.M., 1994. Natural occurrence ofinsect pathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) inEgyptian soils. Afro-Asian J. Nematol. 4, 151–154.
Shapiro-Ilan, D.I., Gardner, W.A., Fuxa, J.R., Word, B.W., Nguyen,K.B., Adams, B.J., Humber, R.A., Hall, M.J., 2003. Survey ofentomopathogenic nematodes and fungi endemic to pecan orchards ofthe Southeastern United States and their virulence to the pecan weevil(Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environ. Entomol. 32, 187–195.
Shishiniova, M., Budurova, L., Gradinarov, D., 1998. Contribution to thefauna of the entomopathogenic nematodes/rhabditida: Steinernemat-idae, Heterorhabditidae form Bulgaria II. Biotech. Biotechnol. Equip.12, 104–108.
Shishiniova, M., Budurova, L., Gradinarov, D., 2000. Entomopathogenicnematodes from Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae (Nematoda:Rhabditida) in Bulgaria. Bull. OILB/SROP 23, 75–78.
Simoes, N., Caldas, C., Rosa, J.S., Bonifassi, E., Laumond, C., 2000.Pathogenicity caused by high virulent and low virulent strains ofSteinernema carpocapsae to Galleria mellonella. J. Invertebr. Pathol.75, 47–54.
Soil Survey Staff, 1994. Keys to Soil taxonomy. USDA Soil ConservationService, Washington, D.C.
Spiridonov, S., Lyons, E., Wilson, M., 2004. Steinernema kraussei
(Rhabditida, Steinernematidae) from Iceland. Comparat. Parasitol.71, 215–220.
Steiner, W., 1996. Distribution of entomopathogenic nematodes in theSwiss Alps. Suisse J. Zool. 103, 439–452.
Steinhorst, J.W., 1966. Killing nematodes for taxonomic study with hotFA 4:1. Nematologica 12, 178.
Stock, S.P., 1995. Natural populations of entomopathogenic nema-todes in the pampean region of Argentina. Nematropica 25, 143–148.
Stock, S.P., Koppenhofer, A.M., 2003. Steinernema scarabaei n. sp.(Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), a natural pathogen of scarab beetlelarvae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from New Jersey, USA. Nematol-ogy 5, 191–204.
Stock, S.P., Reid, A.P., 2004. Biosystematics (Steinernematidae, Hetero-rhabditidae): current status and future directions. Nematol. Monogr.Perspec. 2, 435–446.
Stock, S.P., Pryor, B.M., Kaya, H.K., 1999. Distribution of entomopath-ogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae) in naturalhabitats in California. Biodivers. Conserv. 8, 535–549.
Stock, S.P., Mracek, Z., Webster, M., 2000. Morphological variationbetween allopatric populations of Steinernema kraussei (Steiner, 1923)(Rhabditida: Steinernematidae). Nematology 2, 143–152.
Stock, S.P., Somsook, V., Reid, A.P., 1998. Steinernema siamkayai n. sp.(Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), an entomopathogenic nematode fromThailand. Syst. Parasitol. 41, 105–113.
Sturhan, D., 1999. Prevalence and specificity of entomopathogenicnematodes in Germany. In: Gwynn, .L., Smits, P.H., Griffin, C.,Ehlers, R.U., Boemare, N., Masson, J.P. (Eds.) COST 819 Applicationand Persistence of Entomopathogenic Nematodes. European Com-mission, DG XII, Luxembourg, pp: 123–132.
Sturhan, D., Liskova, M., 1999. Occurrence and distribution of entomo-pathogenic nematodes in the Slovak Republic. Nematology 1, 273–277.
Sturhan, D., Ruess, L., 1999. An undescribed Steinernema sp. (Nematoda:Steimernematidae) from Germany and the Scandinavian Subartic.Russian J. Nematol. 7, 43–47.
Stuart, R.J., Gaugler, R., 1994. Patchiness in population of entomopath-ogenic nematodes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 64, 39–45.
Susurluk, A., Dix, I., Stackebrandt, E., Strauch, O., Wyss, U., Ehlers, R.-U.,2001. Identification and ecological characterisation of three entomo-pathogenic nematode-bacterium complexes from Turkey. Nematology3, 833–841.
Susurluk, A., Hollmer, S., Mehta, U.K., Han, R., Tarasco, E., Triggian,O., Peters, A., Ehlers, R.-U., 2003. Molecular identification ofentomopathogenic nematodes from Turkey, India, China, Italy,Norway, Albania and Germany by PCR-RFLP. 9th EuropeanMeeting of the IOBC/WPRS Working Group, Schloss Salzau,Germany, 23–29 May 2003.
Tarasco, E., 1997. Infectivity comparison among eight Steinernema feltiae
(Filipjev, 1934) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) isolated from southernItalian soils. Entomologica 31, 171–179.
Tarasco, E., Triggiani, O., 1997. Survey of Steinernema and Heterorhab-
ditis (Rhabditida: Nematoda) in southern Italian soils. Entomologica31, 117–123.
Triggiani, O., Tarasco, E., 2000. Occurrence of entomopathogenicnematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae)in pine and oak Woods in Southern Italy. Entomologica 34,23–32.
R. Campos-Herrera et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95 (2007) 125–139 139
Vrain, T.C., Wakarchuk, D.A., Levesque, A.C., Hamilton, R.I., 1992.Intraspecific rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphims inthe Xiphinema anericanun group. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 15,563–574.
Wang, J., Bedding, R.A., 1996. Population development of Heterorhabdi-
tis bacteriophora and Steinernema carpocapsae in the larvae of Galleria
mellonella. Fundam. Appl. Namatol. 19, 363–367.White, G.F., 1927. A method for obtaining infective nematode larvae from
cultures. Science 66, 302–303.
Yoshida, M., 2003. Intraspecific variation in RFLP patterns and morpho-logical studies on Steinernema feltiae and S. kraussei (Rhabditida:Steinernematidae) from Hokkaido, Japan. Nematology 5, 735–746.
Yoshida, M., 2004. Steinernema litorale n. sp. (Rhabditida: Steinerne-matidae), a new entomopathogenic nematode from Japan. Nematolo-gy 6, 819–838.
Yoshida, M., Reid, A.P., Briscoe, B.R., Homonick, W.M., 1998. Survey ofentomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae andHeterorhabditidae) in Japan. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 21, 185–198.