Contrast agents and mechanisms
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Contrast agents and mechanisms
TECHNOLOGIES
DRUG DISCOVERY
TODAY
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies Vol. 8, No. 2–4 2011
Editors-in-Chief
Kelvin Lam – Blue Sky Biotech Inc., USA
Henk Timmerman – Vrije Universiteit, The Netherlands
Imaging techniques
Contrast agents and mechanismsWalter Dastru, Dario Longo, Aime Silvio*Universita degli Studi di Torino, Dipartimento di Chimica Inorganica, Fisica e dei Materiali, Centro di Imaging Molecolare, via Nizza, 52-10126 Torino, Italy
MRI contrast agents are routinely used in clinical set-
tings. Important advances in their design have been
attained in the past few years to overcome sensitivity
issues and to make possible molecular imaging applica-
tions by means of this modality. Besides the sensitivity
enhancement of paramagnetic relaxation probes, out-
standing results have been obtained in the develop-
ment of novel classes of frequency-encoding agents
such as chemical exchange saturation transfer and
hyperpolarized 13C-enriched molecules.
*Corresponding author.: S. Aime ([email protected])
1740-6749/$ � 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2011.11.013
Guest Editors:Nicolau Beckmann – Novartis Institutes for BioMedicalResearch, Basel, Switzerland.Bert Windhorst – VU Medical Center, Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
tion transfer (CEST) agents, and 19F-containing molecules or
Introduction
Currently, at least one-third of the MRI scans acquired at
clinical settings make use of contrast agents (CAs). Their use
led to remarkable improvements in medical diagnosis in
terms of higher specificity, better tissue characterization,
reduction of imaging artifacts and improved functional infor-
mation. The agents that have entered the clinical practice are
chemicals containing paramagnetic metal ions that markedly
affect the relaxation rates of tissues water protons in the
regions where they distribute. They belong to the class of
paramagnetic metal complexes (mainly Gd3+ chelates) [1]
and to the class of iron oxide particles [2]. The former systems
act predominantly on T1 yielding hyperintensity in the cor-
responding T1-weighted images and are often called T1 or
positive agents. The latter class deals with systems which
mainly cause a shortening of T2 or T2* that result in a
darkening effect on the corresponding T2 or T2* weighted
images and are therefore called T2 or negative agents.
In the past decade, the research activities in the field of MRI
CAs have undertaken several new directions. On one hand
much work has been done in chemical laboratories to
improve the characteristics of T1 and T2 agents, also at the
light of affecting their biodistribution (targeted and nano-
sized systems) and, on the other hand, new achievements
based on alternative modalities to alter the contrast in the 1H-
MR images, such as the case of the chemical exchange satura-
hyperpolarized probes, respectively. Therefore the current
picture of the possibilities of enhancing the contrast in MR
images is now very rich (Box 1) and well suitable to make MRI
more competitive with other imaging modalities in the emer-
ging field of molecular imaging [3].
T1 agents
The efficiency of a paramagnetic metal complex to act as T1
agent is first of all represented by its relaxivity (r1) that, for
commercial CAs such as Magnevist1, Dotarem1, ProHance1
and Omniscan1 is around 3.4–3.5 mM�1 s�1 (at 20 MHz and
398C). r1 is the relaxation enhancement of water protons
brought about by the presence of the paramagnetic agent
at 1 mM concentration [4]. Besides acting as catalyst for the
relaxation of water protons, a paramagnetic MRI CA has to
possess several additional properties to guarantee the safety
issues required for in vivo applications at the administered
doses, namely high thermodynamic (and possibly kinetic)
stability, good solubility and low osmolarity.
Chemists have tackled the task of attaining higher relax-
ivities first by designing highly stable complexes character-
ized by an higher hydration of the paramagnetic center
e109
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies | Imaging techniques Vol. 8, No. 2–4 2011
Box 1.
19F Containing
Probes
MRI
Contrast
Agents
CEST
Agents
Hyperpolarized
Probes
T1
Iron Oxide
Particles
T1
Paramagnetic
Metal Complexes
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
(in principle as r1 scales up with hydration, increasing the
number of water molecules in the inner coordination sphere
of the paramagnetic metal ion from 1 to 2 means doubling
the relaxivity).
In this context remarkable is the work done at Raymond’s
lab [5] in the field of the development of hydroxypyridone-
based ligands (HOPO) designed to fit at best the coordination
preferences of Gd3+ especially as far as it concerns its oxophi-
licity (Fig. 1). The HOPO ligands provide a hexadentate coor-
dination for Gd3+, in which all the donor atoms are oxygens.
Because Gd3+ favors eight or nine coordination geometry, the
structural design offered by HOPO complexes provides two to
three open sites for inner-sphere water molecules coordina-
tion. These complexes also show a very high thermodynamic
stability. The relaxivity improvement provided by Gd(III)
complexes of HOPO-based ligands is two to three times higher
than that of commercial CAs. Other interesting solutions have
been sought in the family of heptadentate ligands that give rise
to Gd-complexes containing two coordinated water mole-
cules. In this context much attention has been given to AAZTA
(6-amino-6-methylperhydro-1,4-diazepinetetraacetic acid)
and derived ligands for their easy synthesis (Fig. 1) [6].
Gd-containing targeting probes
Human serum albumin (HSA) has been the first deeply inves-
tigated target for Gd-complexes with the aim of developing
blood pool agents. Several systems have been investigated over
the past two decades for the set-up of supramolecular adducts
inwhichsuitably functionalizedGd-complexes reversiblybind
to albumin [7]. In addition to a higher vascular retention time,
e110 www.drugdiscoverytoday.com
these macromolecular adducts are often characterized by a
longer relaxivity (at 0.5–1.5 T) thanks to the elongation of the
molecular reorientational time which is a major determinant
of the relaxivity at these fields.
MultiHance1 is a representative example of complexes
that weakly bind to HSA [8] (with a consequent smaller
increase of the observed relaxivity in blood) whereas Vaso-
vist1 represents a system [9] with a high binding affinity with
the serum protein (at the recommended administration
doses, the amount of the bound form approaches 80%).
Much has been done (and is being currently done) in the
field of Gd-complexes designed to target specific epitopes on
the outer cell membrane. Because the MRI visualization of a
cell requires 107–109 Gd-containing units [10], this task has
been often addressed by using nanosized carriers able to
deliver a high payload of CAs. The investigated nanocarriers
include apoferritin [11], low-density lipoproteins (LDL) [12],
viral capsides [13,14] and yeast [15] as naturally occurring
systems as well as several ‘artificial’ supramolecular systems
such as micelles, liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, and
dendrimers, among others [16].
The use of the latter systems has opened the new direction
of MRI-guided drug delivery that is currently under intense
scrutiny. Alternatively, with the use of nano-/micro-sized
carriers, the threshold for the MRI visualization may be
reached by exploiting cellular internalization through high
capacity transporters [11]. Good results have been obtained
with the use of suitably functionalized Gd-complexes that
target the organic anion transport protein (Fig. 2) or amino
acids [17] and folate transporters [18,19], respectively.
Vol. 8, No. 2–4 2011 Drug Discovery Today: Technologies | Imaging techniques
H3C CH3
CH3
CH3
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
HOPO - based ligands
HN
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
OAAZTA
HO
HO
HO
ONH NH
OH OH
OH
OH
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the HOPO-based (top) and
AAZTA (bottom) ligands.
Gd-based responsive agents
The in-depth understanding of the structural and dynamic
determinants of the observed relaxivities has prompted che-
mists to design systems able to modify their ability to
enhance water proton relaxation rates in response to changes
of physicochemical parameters of the microenvironment in
which they distribute [20]. Typical parameters of primary
diagnostic relevance include pH, temperature, pO2, enzy-
matic activity, redox potential. Unfortunately, the in vivo
translation is still uncertain because the transformation of
T1 into r1 maps (the parameter that owns the responsiveness
toward a given physicochemical or biological parameter)
requires to know the actual concentration of the paramag-
netic agent that it is not easily accessible. It has been shown
that, in some instances, this issue can be circumvented by
setting up a proper ratiometric method based on the measure
of T1 and T2 provided that the two relaxation times have
different dependence from the change in the parameters of
interest [21].
Mn(II)-based complexes
Paramagnetic chelates of Mn(II) (five unpaired electrons)
have also been considered. The main drawback appears to
be related to the stability of these complexes. Mn(II) is
an essential metal; therefore, the evolution has selected
biological structures for sequestering Mn(II) ions with high
efficiency. Combined with the fact that Mn(II) forms highly
labile coordination complexes, it has been difficult to design
Mn(II) chelates that maintain their integrity when adminis-
tered to living organisms.
The only approved Mn(II) agent is Mangafodipir (manga-
nese-dipyridoxal diphosphate, Mn-DPDP or Teslascan1) [7].
It is a CA proposed for liver-associated diseases. Mn-DPDP is a
manganese chelate derived from vitamin B6 (pyridoxal 5-
phosphate) and is specifically taken up by the hepatocytes.
In particular, the agent is taken up by normal hepatocytes
resulting in increased signal on T1-weighted images, and is
excreted in the biliary system. It is the only agent that releases
metal ions to endogenous macromolecules. The huge proton
relaxation enhancement brought about by the resulting
Mn(II) protein adducts is responsible for the MRI visualiza-
tion of hepatocytes also at low administered doses of Mn-
DPDP.
T2-susceptibility agents
The term susceptibility refers to the tendency of a certain
substance to become magnetized. The intensity of magneti-
zation (M) is related to the strength of the inducing magnetic
field (B) through a constant of proportionality (k) known as
the magnetic susceptibility (M = kB). The magnetic suscept-
ibility is a unitless constant that is determined by the physical
properties of the magnetic material. It can take on either
positive or negative values. Positive values imply that the
induced magnetic field is in the same direction as the indu-
cing field. Negative values imply that the induced magnetic
field is in the opposite direction as the inducing field. Thus T2
susceptibility agents work upon distorting the applied mag-
netic field leading to a loss of signal in T2 weighted images.
Iron oxide particles
Superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (SPIO) have the gen-
eral formula Fe(III)2O3Fe(II)O [2]. The change in the magnetic
susceptibility caused by the superparamagnetic core induces
a large distortion of the externally applied magnetic field
which, in turn, leads to hypo-intensities in T2 weighted
images. Thus the areas containing particles display fast trans-
verse relaxation rates and low signal intensity (negative
contrast). Because of the large magnetic susceptibility of an
iron oxide particle, the signal void is much larger than the
particle size, enhancing detectability at the expense of reso-
lution. Iron oxide particles for MRI applications are divided
into two classes, namely SPIO and USPIO (ultrasmall super-
paramagnetic iron oxide), on the basis of the overall size of
the protective cover on the surface of the magnetic particle.
In fact, in both types of particles the iron oxide colloidal
particles are encapsulated by organic material such as dextran
and carboxydextran to improve their compatibility with the
biological systems. The difference in the overall size of the
particles cause marked changes in their use as MRI CAs.
www.drugdiscoverytoday.com e111
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies | Imaging techniques Vol. 8, No. 2–4 2011
pre-contrast post-contrast
1.5x10-8
1.0x10-8
O
O
OH
NN
NH
N
O
O
O-
O
O
O
O-
O-O-
O- O-Gd3+
5.0x10-9
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
[Gd-L] mM
Gd(
III)
mol
es /
mg
prot
.
2.0x10-8
2.5x10-8
3.0x10-8
HTC
HEPATOCYTES
37 ºC, 6h
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
Figure 2. The lipophilic Gd(III) complex enters hepatocytes through organic anion transport protein (OATP). Therefore the liver parenchyma appears
hyperintense and the occurrence of colon cancer metastasis is well detectable as a black spot (arrow) in the corresponding post-contrast MR image
(courtesy of Bracco Imaging). HTC, hepatoma tissue culture cells.
USPIO have longer half-life in the blood vessels than SPIO
because their smaller size (<50 nm) makes their uptake from
macrophages more difficult. On the contrary, SPIO (with
diameters of the order of 100–200 nm) are very rapidly
removed from the circulation by the reticuloendothelial
system. In terms of relaxation enhancement properties, the
larger magnetic susceptibility of SPIO yields to larger R2/R1
relaxation rates and higher T2-shortening effects than those
brought about by the smaller USPIO particles. These particles
have been used to track different cell types ‘in vivo’, including
T lymphocytes, macrophages and stem cells [22–24].
CEST agents
The new landscape of molecular imaging applications
prompts the search for new paradigms in the design of
MR-imaging reporters. A possibility relies on the exploita-
tion of the frequency, the key parameter of the NMR phe-
nomenon. The roots for this class of agents go back to the
well established magnetization transfer (MT) procedure,
which makes use of the transfer of saturated magnetization
from tissue mobile protons (primarily from proteins) to bulk
water upon radiofrequency (RF) irradiation of their semi-
solid-like, broad NMR absorption. The use of exogenous,
e112 www.drugdiscoverytoday.com
mobile molecules, dubbed CEST agents, introduces the
possibility of a selective RF irradiation of the sharper
NMR signal of the exchangeable protons of the probe
[25,26]. Thus, one may design protocols in which the con-
trast in the MR image is generated ‘at will’ only if the
appropriate frequency corresponding to the labile protons
of the exogenous agent is irradiated. Importantly, the new
approach offers the possibility of detecting more than one
agent in the same region.
The CEST contrast arises from the decrease in the intensity
of the bulk water signal following the saturation of the
exchanging protons of the CEST agent by means of a selective
RF pulse (Fig. 3).
Hence, the basic requisite for a CEST agent is that the
exchange rate between its mobile protons and the bulk water
protons (kCEST) has to be smaller than the frequency differ-
ence between the absorption frequencies of the exchanging
spins (i.e. kCEST < Dv).
In the CEST experiment, the RF pulse of angular frequency
v2 = g � B2, where B2 is the intensity of the applied RF pulse, is
applied at the Dv frequency offset corresponding to the
resonance of the mobile protons of the CA, to saturate their
longitudinal magnetization (MzCEST).
Vol. 8, No. 2–4 2011 Drug Discovery Today: Technologies | Imaging techniques
H H
H
ωCEST
rf irradiation
at ωCEST
ωbulk water
If Δω ≥ kex
H
H
HCESTagent
O
kex
rf
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.00
10 8 6 4 2
ppm
irradiation time (s)
no irradiation Irradiation at ωCEST
0 -2 -4 10 8 6 4 2
ppm0 -2 -4
1 2 3 4 5
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the origin of the CEST contrast in a MR image. Upon irradiating the NMR resonance of a pool of exchangeable
protons, saturated magnetization is transferred to the ‘bulk’ water signal yielding a hypointensity in the corresponding MR image.
One of the main limiting factors of CEST agents for in vivo
application is represented by their lower sensitivity compared
with the conventional Gd and Fe based agents. Among the
different parameters governing the CEST effect, the exchange
rate of the mobile protons of the agent, kCEST, has received so
far much attention, because this parameter can be easily
modulated by changing the chemical characteristics of the
exchanging group. In addition, kCEST is usually dependent on
physicochemical variables like temperature or pH, thus
allowing CEST agents to be used as responsive reporters.
CEST agents are usually classified into two main groups:
diamagnetic and paramagnetic systems [27]. The members of
each class can be further divided into subgroups depending
on other criteria such as their size or particular chemical
characteristics. All the PARACEST (PARAmagnetic chemical
exchange saturation transfer) agents proposed so far are
lanthanide(III)-complexes endowed with two kinds of mobile
protons: (i) protons of water molecules coordinated to the
Ln(III) ion and (ii) mobile protons belonging to the ligand
structure.
The unique feature of CEST agents, that is, the possibility to
visualize more than one agent in the same image, is extremely
advantageous for designing MRI cell-tracking experiments in
which two (or more) cell lines, each one labeled with a
specific CEST probe, are simultaneously injected and visua-
lized over time by MRI. Analogously, it is possible to visualize
two CEST agents in vivo (Fig. 4) [28].
Hyperpolarized molecules
Both MRI and in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)
suffer from low sensitivity, which is intrinsic in the NMR
experiment. For this reason, the applications of MRI have
been essentially restricted to 1H (100% natural abundance,
high g value). Low g heteronuclei have been used only for
MRS [29,30], but high concentrations and very long acquisi-
tion times are in this case necessary.
Because the NMR signal intensity is proportional to polar-
ization, much attention has been devoted to procedures that
lead to a modification of the spin population distribution to
enhance the response. The non-equilibrium state obtained is
called hyperpolarized state and can be exploited to directly
detect the heteronuclei with fast acquisition of MR images
and spectra which are characterized by high signal to noise
ratios and are free from any background signal [3,31–34].
Hyperpolarized molecules are themselves the source of the
NMR signal, and signal intensity linearly depends upon their
concentration and polarization level. For this reason, a fun-
damental requisite for a hyperpolarized molecule to be used
www.drugdiscoverytoday.com e113
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies | Imaging techniques Vol. 8, No. 2–4 2011
@-17 ppm
@ 7 ppm
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
Figure 4. In vivo visualization of two CEST agents characterized by
absorptions of the exchangeable pools of protons at 7 (green) and
�17 (red) ppm, respectively. The saturation transfer maps are
superimposed over the anatomic image.
as MRI/MRS CA is the long relaxation time of the hetero-
nucleus of interest. In fact, there must be a time long enough
to acquire the image/spectrum before the relaxation pro-
cesses re-establish the equilibrium spin populations, thus
causing loss of signal.
Four different methods have been proposed to produce
hyperpolarized molecules: (i) the brute force method (which
consists of subjecting the sample to a very strong magnetic
field at a temperature close to absolute zero), (ii) optical
pumping and spin exchange, (iii) para-hydrogen induced
polarization and (iv) dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP).
In spite of its technological requirements and expensive-
ness, DNP is the most versatile method, which allows, in
principle, to polarize every nucleus in every molecule. It
consists of the polarization transfer from electrons to nuclei
in solids by irradiation with a proper microwave (mw) fre-
quency, at or near to the electron resonance frequency
[35,36]. In practice, the material to be polarized is dissolved
in a glass-forming solvent, doped with a stable radical species
and placed into the magnetic field. The solution is brought to
very low temperature (1–2 K, liquid helium) to generate high
electron polarization, and irradiated to transfer it to nuclei.
After the polarization transfer has taken place, the mw is
switched off, the sample is raised above the liquid helium
e114 www.drugdiscoverytoday.com
level and is rapidly warmed (usually by dissolution in hot
water) still inside the magnetic field. It is then quickly trans-
ferred for the MRI acquisition.
Several 13C-labeled substrates, hyperpolarized by the DNP
method, have been tested for metabolic applications. Most
attention has been devoted to 13C-labeled pyruvate. Pyruvate
is a key-molecule in major metabolic and catabolic pathways
in the mammalian cells, as it is converted to alanine, lactate
or carbonate by alanine transaminase, lactate dehydrogenase
(LDH) and pyruvate dehydrogenase, respectively, to a differ-
ent extent depending on the status of the cells.
Several papers about metabolic imaging by 13C-enriched
hyperpolarized pyruvate have appeared in the literature since
2006. The most appealing application is its use for tumor
diagnosis, stadiation and monitoring of response to treat-
ment, by exploiting the increased lactate production through
LDH in tumor tissues. Murine lymphoma, P22 rat sarcoma,
adenocarcinoma of mice prostate, glioblastoma and breast
cancer in mice have been studied by this method. Further-
more, the reduction of the conversion of pyruvate to lactate
in tumors has been observed within 24 hours of chemother-
apy in the treatment of lymphoma-bearing mice, suggesting
that hyperpolarized 1-[13C]pyruvate may also find applica-
tion in the evaluation of the response to therapeutic treat-
ment. This result has been recently confirmed by comparing
the response to treatment as measured by hyperpolarized 1-
[13C]pyruvate MRI and by PET determination of 2-[18F]fluor-
odeoxyglucose (FDG). Uptake of [18F]FDG was shown to be a
good reporter of the response immediately after treatment
compared with 1-[13C]pyruvate, while at 24 hours after treat-
ment the results were comparable for both technologies.
Conclusions
Molecular imaging is a new science that will have a tremen-
dous impact in understanding biology and in the develop-
ment of innovative diagnostic tools for early diagnoses and
monitoring therapeutic treatments. In the first stage of its
enrollment it has relied massively on PET/SPECT and Optical
Imaging technologies because of the superior sensitivity of
their tracers. In the long term MRI/MRS approaches may
recover a central role provided that further sensitivity
improvement will be attained. As discussed in this survey,
there are several routes to tackle these issues and the promises
are very positive thanks to the multi-nuclear, multi-para-
metric characteristics of the NMR experiment. Along the
way to improve the competitive asset of MRI with respect
to the other imaging modalities there is the need to endow
the probes with higher sensitivity and targeting specificity.
The development of frequency-encoding CAs will be very
important to make the MRI approach the one that allows the
multi-detection of different reporting agents in the same
image. As molecular imaging is the evolution of biologist
in vitro work that has revolutionized the way living cells and
Vol. 8, No. 2–4 2011 Drug Discovery Today: Technologies | Imaging techniques
intact tissues were investigated, MRI multiplex-visualization
of biological processes appears to be a key task for the forth-
coming years for an efficient translation of such outstanding
achievements. Moreover, new avenues for MRI probes will
have to be undertaken to face the technologies advances, for
instance in the field of dual-modality scanners that will be
soon available to the clinical practice.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the EU
project ENCITE (European Network for Cell Imaging and
Tracking Expertise: HEALTH-2007-1.2-4), the MIUR (Minis-
tero della Istruzione, Universita e Ricerca) project PRIN
2009235JB7 and the regional project PIIMDMT (Regione
Piemonte).
References1 Caravan, P. et al. (1999) Gadolinium(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents:
structure, dynamics, and applications. Chem Rev 99, 2293–2352
2 Muller, R. et al. (2005) Relaxation by metal-containing nanosystems. In
Advances in Inorganic Chemistry (van Eldik, R. and Bertini, I., eds), pp. 239–
292, Elsevier
3 Terreno, E. et al. (2010) Challenges for molecular magnetic resonance
imaging. Chem Rev 110, 3019–3042
4 Laurent, S. et al. (2006) Comparative study of the physicochemical
properties of six clinical low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging 1, 128–137
5 Datta, A. and Raymond, K.N. (2009) Gd-hydroxypyridinone (HOPO)-
based high-relaxivity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents.
Acc Chem Res 42, 938–947
6 Aime, S. et al. (2004) [Gd-AAZTA]: a new structural entry for an improved
generation of MRI contrast agents. Inorg Chem 43, 7588–7590
7 Aime, S. et al. (1998) Lanthanide(in) chelates for NMR biomedical
applications. Chem Soc Rev 27, 19–29
8 Cavagna, F.M. et al. (1997) Gadolinium chelates with weak binding to
serum proteins. Invest Radiol 32, 780–796
9 Uppal, R. and Caravan, P. (2010) Targeted probes for cardiovascular MRI.
Future Med Chem 2, 451–470
10 Aime, S. et al. (2002) Insights into the use of paramagnetic Gd(III)
complexes in MR-molecular imaging investigations. J Magn Reson Imaging
16, 394–406
11 Aime, S. et al. (2002) Compartmentalization of a gadolinium complex in
the apoferritin cavity: a route to obtain high relaxivity contrast agents for
magnetic resonance imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 41, 1017–1019
12 Geninatti Crich, S. et al. (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging detection of
tumor cells by targeting low-density lipoprotein receptors with Gd-loaded
low-density lipoprotein particles. Neoplasia 9, 1046–1056
13 Datta, A. et al. (2008) High relaxivity gadolinium hydroxypyridonate –
viral capsid conjugates: nanosized MRI contrast agents. J Am Chem Soc 130,
2546–2552
14 Hooker, J.M. et al. (2007) Magnetic resonance contrast agents from viral
capsid shells: a comparison of exterior and interior cargo strategies. Nano
Lett 7, 2207–2210
15 Figueiredo, S. et al. (2011) Yeast cell wall particles: a promising class of
nature-inspired microcarriers for multimodal imaging. Chem Commun 47,
10635
16 Delli Castelli, D. et al. (2008) Metal containing nanosized systems for MR-
molecular imaging applications. Coord Chem Rev 252, 2424–2443
17 Stefania, K. et al. (2009) Tuning glutamine binding modes in Gd-DOTA-
based probes for an improved MRI visualization of tumor cells. Chem Eur J
15, 76–85
18 Wang, Z.J. et al. (2008) MR imaging of ovarian tumors using folate-
receptor-targeted contrast agents. Pediatr Radiol 38, 529–537
19 Corot, C. et al. (2008) Tumor imaging using P866, a high-relaxivity
gadolinium chelate designed for folate receptor targeting. Magn Reson Med
60, 1337–1346
20 Aime, S. et al. (2005) Gd(III)-based contrast agents for MRI. In Advances in
Inorganic Chemistry. Elsevier pp. 173–237
21 Aime, S. et al. (2006) A R2/R1 ratiometric procedure for a concentration-
independent, pH-responsive, Gd(III)-based MRI agent. J Am Chem Soc 128,
11326–11327
22 Cunningham, C.H. et al. (2005) Positive contrast magnetic resonance
imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med 53,
999–1005
23 Laurent, S. et al. (2009) Iron oxide based MR contrast agents: from
chemistry to cell labeling. Curr Med Chem 16, 4712–4727
24 Ho, C. and Hitchens, T.K. (2004) A non-invasive approach to detecting
organ rejection by MRI: monitoring the accumulation of immune cells at
the transplanted organ. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 5, 551–566
25 Aime, S. et al. (2006) High sensitivity lanthanide(III) based probes for MR-
medical imaging. Coord Chem Rev 250, 1562–1579
26 Sherry, A.D. and Woods, M. (2008) Chemical exchange saturation transfer
contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 10,
391–411
27 Woods, M. et al. (2006) Paramagnetic lanthanide complexes as PARACEST
agents for medical imaging. Chem Soc Rev 35, 500
28 Terreno, E. et al. (2010) Encoding the frequency dependence in MRI
contrast media: the emerging class of CEST agents. Contrast Media Mol
Imaging 5, 78–98
29 Gadian, D. (1995) NMR and its Applications to Living Systems (2nd edn),
30 Muller, S. and Beckmann, N. (1989) 13C spectroscopic imaging A simple
approach to in vivo 13C investigations. Magn Reson Med 12, 400–406
31 Viale, A. et al. (2009) Hyperpolarized agents for advanced MRI
investigations. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53, 604–617
32 Viale, A. and Aime, S. (2010) Current concepts on hyperpolarized
molecules in MRI. Curr Opin Chem Biol 14, 90–96
33 Kurhanewicz, J. et al. (2011) Analysis of cancer metabolism by imaging
hyperpolarized nuclei: prospects for translation to clinical research.
Neoplasia 13, 81–97
34 Brindle, K.M. et al. (2011) Tumor imaging using hyperpolarized 13C
magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 66, 505–519
35 Abragam, A. and Goldman, M. (1978) Principles of dynamic nuclear
polarisation. Rep Prog Phys 41, 395–467
36 Comment, A. et al. (2007) Design and performance of a DNP prepolarizer
coupled to a rodent MRI scanner. Concepts Magn Reson B 31B, 255–269
www.drugdiscoverytoday.com e115