Comparison of Degumming Techniques of Silk
Transcript of Comparison of Degumming Techniques of Silk
Comparison of Degumming Techniques of Silk
D. Saravanan & G. NalankilliDepartment of Textile Technology
Bannari Amman Institute of TechnologySathyamangalam Erode Dist
Introduction
The various processes involved in the raw silk manufacture
include stifling, cooking, reeling and re-reeling. The sericin
in the silk forms a cementing layer on the surface of the twin
filaments facilitating good adhesion to keep the filament intact.
The gum present in the silk filament is, chemically, a non-
filamentous protein because of which raw silk possesses neither
luster nor the softness that are commonly associated with silk.
Besides fibroin and sericin, raw silk also contains other natural
impurities, which includes small amount of silk wax (0.4 – 0.8
percent), inorganic matter (0.7 percent), carbohydrates (1.2 –
1.6 percent) and coloured pigment (0.2 percent). The nature of
pigment varies with the type of silk [1]. Colour / pigments in
the domesticated silk appear prior to cocoon formation (yellow
pigments, green pigments) or one or two days after the cocoon
1
formation (brown pigments) which is mainly decided by dietary
nature of the worms
Sericin and Fibroin
Sericin plays a major role in the structure of cocoon, binds the
twin filaments together and constitutes about 25% weight of the
cocoon. It is soluble in hot water and gels on cooling. Sericin
has white, greenish or golden-yellow colour depending upon the
breed of the silk spinner. Sericin is a kind of globular protein
with mainly amorphous structure without any crystallization
taking place in it eventhough it is subjected to a similar stress
levels while spinning. Sericin is rich with amino acids such as
serine, glycine and aspartic acid totaling to the extent of 2/3.
These proteins are synthesized, secreted and stored in the middle
gland, form a sheath around the fibroin core during spinning of
the silk filament. The main function of the sericin is to lower
the shear stress and to absorb the water squeezed from the
structured fibroin during the process of fibre formation and
extrusion [2, 3].
2
In the fibre, fibroin chains are aligned along the fibre axis,
held together by a close network of inter-chain hydrogen bonds
amount the –(Ala-Gly)n – sequences leading to formation of beta
sheet crystals, besides the salt linkages / electrovalent bonds
formed between the amino acids of adjacent chains such as
aspartic, glutamic acid and lysine, arginine.
The crystallites of mulberry silk contain both alpha and beta
forms to the extent of 63 – 67 %. Swelling and reactivity are
the lowest in the isoelectric region of pH 4 – 5 [4].
Isoelectric point of sericin is pH 4.0 - 4.1 whereas it is 4.9
for fibroin [5, 6], which is in resonance with higher proportion
of ionizable acidic groups. Compared to fibroin, sericin is
richer in cystine, which varies in gland and cocoon as well as
among the species of silk worms. The sericin content of reeled
filament has been found to vary from the outer to inner layers.
The density of the sericin lies around 1.41 g/cc with a degree of
crystallinity of approximately 15 % and the moisture regain of,
around, 16%. In contrast to fibroin, more polar groups are
3
available in sericin of which 60% are hydroxyl groups, 30% are
acidic groups and 10% are basic groups [5, 7].
Sericin Fraction
The sericin content varies among the various types of the natural
silk with the highest content existing in the mulberry silk [8].
Silk Sericin content (%)Mulberry 20 – 30 Tasar 5 – 15 Muga 7 – 8 Eri 4 – 5
Three different fractions are obtained from sericin based on
their relative solubility and histological staining, which
reveals existence of a three distinct layers of sericin in the
gland [5, 6]. Sericin of tasar silk is reported to contain at
least nine kinds of proteins laid down in a wavy form rather than
in layers. Recently, four stratified fractions have been
obtained from sericin identified using differing rates of
dissolution in hot water and UV absorption methods.
Sericin A – Soluble at pH 4 but insoluble in 75 percent alcoholSericin B – Sparingly soluble in hot water, resists proteolysisSericin C – Extremely insoluble in common solvents and isunaffected by enzymes.Sericin D – Small fraction, soluble in 75 percent alcohol
4
Readily soluble fraction shows random coil conformation and
lesser soluble fraction shows tendency towards beta conformation
and increase in specific gravity and degree of crystallinity.
Association of the inner most fraction of sericin with a wax
constituent secreted by the gland accounts for its lower
solubility. The two outer layers are removed by alkali while the
third layer, which intimately attached to the fibroin is very
difficult to remove, requires longer duration [9]. Sericin
content of the natural silk can be estimated by boiling silk
using Marseille soap and calculating the weight loss [10]. Table
1 gives the composition of the various amino acids present in the
sericin component and its comparison with fibroin and wool
keratin.
Table 1 Amino Acid Composition (mole %) of sericin and fibroin
Amino Acid Sericin I
SericinII
SericinIII
SericinIV
Whole
Fibroin
5
Sericin
Glycine 13.21 12.81 15.69 11.89 13.9 43.7Alanine 4.68 6.69 6.68 9.3 5.9 28.8Valine 2.97 2.21 3.21 4.16 2.7 2.2Leucine 0.86 0.96 1.27 6.26 1.1 0.5Isoleucine 0.59 0.57 0.85 3.50 0.7 0.7Serine 34.03 36.64 28.15 12.40 33.4 11.9Theronine 10.34 8.48 11.36 7.25 9.7 0.9Aspartic Acid 16.94 16.95 16.13 12.64 16.7 1.3Glutamic Acid 4.73 3.64 4.09 11.32 4.4 1.0Phenylanine 0.45 0.44 0.50 2.83 0.5 0.6Tyrosine 2.53 2.43 3.15 2.45 2.6 5.1Lysine 3.28 3.29 2.64 7.11 3.3 0.3Histidine 1.25 1.22 1.49 1.87 1.3 0.2Arginine 3.20 2.65 3.68 3.93 3.1 0.5Proline 0.58 0.63 0.66 2.75 0.6 0.5Tryptophan 0.19 0.20 0.25 0.23 0.2 0.3Cystine 0.17 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.1 0.2Methionine 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.12 0.04 0.1Hydroxy Amino Acids
46.90 47.54 42.66 22.10 45.7 17.9
Acidic Amino Acids
21.67 20.59 20.22 23.96 21.1 2.3
Basic Amino Acids 7.73 7.16 7.81 12.91 7.7 1.0Amino Acids with Sulphur Containing Side Groups
0.1 0.2
Amino Acids with Polar Side Groups
76.3 75.29 70.69 58.97 74.6 21.2
Amino Acids with Non-polar Side Groups
23.74 24.70 29.27 41.03 24.6 76.5
Degumming of Silk
6
Degumming is defined as a process involving “ the removal of
sericin (silk gum) from silk yarns or fabrics, or from silk waste
prior to spinning at controlled conditions intended to have
little or no effect on the underlying fibroin” [8, 11, 12, 13,
14, 15]. Until 1879, silk degumming was carried out using the
solution of straw ash extracts which yielded good whiteness also.
Fibroin is water insoluble while sericin is soluble at elevated
temperatures but swells in presence of many chemicals [16].
Addition of surface active compounds like soap or nonionic
detergents aids the removal of sericin and also improves the
wetting properties of the degummed material. Hydrolysis prevails
when strong alkaline compounds are added to the degumming bath
and therefore control must be exercised over time, pH temperature
and concentration of the agents, which otherwise can adversely
affect the fibres under treatment. The removal of sericin in
chemical degumming is a combination of various effects such as
dispersion, solubilization and hydrolysis of different sericin
polypeptides. Fibroin is sensitive in alkali while sericin is
soluble in alkali [9]. This can lead to fibre degradation and
7
subsequent loss in aesthetics and physical properties such as
dull appearance, surface fibrillation, poor handle, drop in
tensile strength and uneven dyestuff absorption during dyeing and
printing. Degumming can be carried out in a washing machine,
star frames and dyeing machine [17, 14, 18]. Fabrics can be
treated in open width form also, which is useful for printing
purpose [4, 9]. Tasar silk is more difficult to degum than
mulberry silk because of more mineral matters present in tasar
silk and harsh and chemically resistant nature [19, 20]. Table 2
gives the various methods followed for degumming.
Table 2 Methods of Degumming of SilkMethod CharacteristicsClassicalMethod
Treatment with “Marseille soap” followed by aboiling off and weakly ammoniacal rinsing
PhysicalMethod
Treatment with ultrasound at -180o C, Treatmentwith water under pressure at 121o C
EnzymeMethod
Treatment with enzyme (papain, trypsin, alcalase)followed by boiling off with hot water underpressure and weakly alkaline solution like sodiumbicarbonate, ammonia or acidic solution liketartaric, citric acid.
Acid Method Treatment with tartaric, succinic acid, dichloro,trichloro acetic acids for 30 minutes, nearboiling temperatures.
NewestMethod forContinuousProcess
Treatment with powder products containing sodiumcompounds (phosphate and carbonate), sometimeswith a soap additive. Treatment with liquidproducts containing additionally to sodium salts,anionic surfactants, chelating agents and fibre
8
protective agents.Extraction with water
Sericin is water soluble at temperatures above 100o C while
autoclaved for prolonged periods, at least for 2 hours [8, 13,
21]. Since all the sericin is not removed by this method,
addition of nonionic synthetic detergents facilitates the removal
of sericin while maintaining the strength of the yarns [8]. Heat
treatment at high temperature results change in morphology, in
the case of mulberry silk whereas it remains unchanged in wild
silk. Degree of crystallinity and crystalline orientation
function appear to be reduced due to heat treatments in the case
of mulberry silk [22]. Wild silk fibres have noticeable
properties such as high chemical resistance, high Tg and high
thermolysis temperature due to the presence of tanning agents
which are not found in mulberry silk.
Soap Degumming
Conventional methods of degumming involves treatment of silk
fibres with soaps produced using various vegetable oils. A
systematic study of the degumming action of various soaps
obtained from various fatty acids has been carried out in the
9
past [13, 23]. The degumming action of soap solution is due to
the alkali formed on the hydrolysis of soap. Neutralized soaps
solution has practically no scouring or degumming action on silk.
The traditional method of degumming involves the use of olive oil
(Marselle’s soap) soap. In soap degumming, the fabrics are
soaked for 6 hours in a solution of Marselle soap (3-5 g/l) at 40
– 50o C, then, the samples are boiled for 2 – 6 hours using soap
solution of 8 – 10 g/l at 90- 95o C. Though this is the gentlest
way of degumming silk it is expensive.
Acid Degumming
Though, both fibroin and sericin are susceptible for acid
attacks, the preferential attack on sericin over fibroin takes
place due to the specificity of the acid action on only few amino
acids. The dilute acids attack specifically the peptide bonds
adjacent to aspartic acid, and glutamic acid residues, which vary
significantly in the case of sericin and fibroin. Aspartic acid
residue is 1.0 – 1.9% (mol) in fibroin and is 14.6 -16.7 % (mol)
10
in the case of sericin. Glutamic acid content is 0.8 – 1.4 %
(mol) in the case of fibroin and 4.42 – 7.9% (mol) in the case of
sericin. Various acids used for degumming have been categorized
[24] into three groups namely chloracetic acid, dibasic acid and
hydroxyl acid. In terms of weight loss, all the acids are
equally effective; considering weight loss and tenacity together
succinic acid gives the best results followed tartaric acid and
monochloro acetic acid. Acid degummed silks have better
aesthetics, comfort properties and dyeablity. But weight loss in
the case of monochloroacetic acid, acetic acid is less than
dichloroacetic acid and trichloro acetic acid. Degumming has
also been carried out using sulphuric acid, hydrochloric acids in
the pH range of 1 – 2.9. In the case of tartaric acid, at lower
temperature, the sericin removal is not complete irrespective of
the concentration whereas comparable results to that of soap
degumming can be achieved at 98o C and 4 -10 g/l strength.
Enzyme Degumming
In 1918, Kanegurachi Cotton Co., used an enzyme obtained from a
vegetable oil filter cake or from an animal body tissue known as
11
proteolytic enzyme for degumming raw silk. Enzymes are used as
the alternatives for alkalis, acids or soaps to preserve the
physical properties, uniform removal of sericin and to reduce the
pollution levels [21]. The hydrophilic nature of sericin
accounts for relative ease with which it can be solubilized
during degumming and digested by proteolytic enzymes. Enzymatic
hydrolysis of sericin proteins can be achieved using various
types of enzymes namely trypsin, chymotrypsin, pepsin, bacterial
proteinases, papain, carboxypeptidase A & B, degummases and
luecine amino peptidase. Trypsin and (endopeptidase). Papain
has been recommended for degumming of silk and they
preferentially hydrolyse the peptide bonds formed by the carboxyl
groups of lysine and arginine while in neutral conditions,
fibroin is not attacked by the trypsin. The sericin is rich in
lysine content and in the case of mulberry silk, whereas the
arginine content of both sericin and fibroin is very low.
Complete degumming is not possible with these enzymes, so it
requires further soap treatment. Soap together with a
proteolytic enzyme at 50o C and a pH of 9 is found to be
effective for the degumming process [25]. Papain is sulphydryl
12
enzyme, active at 70-90o C and pH of 5 to 7.5 whereas the
bacterial enzyme alcalase is active at 60o C and pH of 9 [26].
Degumming of silk with papain requires the pretreatment with hot
water to swell the sericin. Because of wide specificity, papain
removes most of the protein substrates extensively compared to
trypsin. It also hydrolyses derivatives of glutamine, histidine,
glutamic acid, leucine, glycine and tyrosine [27].
In the case of highly twisted yarns, proteases fail to remove the
sericin completely, which can be enhanced by mechanical
agitation, ultrasonication [14, 15, 28]. A combination of lipase
and protease has also been tried for the degumming [2, 29] in
which lipase is capable of hydrolyzing waxes into fatty acids and
alcohols and provide positive effects on wettability, comparable
to that of Marseilles soap treatment. By use of cellulase enzyme
along with a proteolytic enzyme complete removal of impurities
and improved wettability can be achieved [26]. Comparable dye
uptake and better luster can be obtained in the case of enzyme
treated silk than soap treated silk due to excess of alkali in
such treatments.
13
Combined Degumming and Bleaching
Generally, silk fibre is bleached after degumming. Conventional
two stage process involves degumming of silk followed by
bleaching at 90o C for 1 hour using hydrogen peroxide, sodium
silicate and sodium carbonate [30]. A combined process for
degumming and bleaching has been developed using peroxide as a
means to reduce the time and energy [30, 31]. Combined degumming
and bleaching of silk using hydrogen peroxide in the presence of
sodium lauryl sulphate has been cost effective and also resulted
in lesser strength loss. Addition of sodium lauryl sulphate up to
22 g/l in combined bath improves whiteness level while retaining
similar strength.
Effect of Process Conditions and Parameters on Properties
Degumming imparts softness to silk and also better resistance to
wear in spite of loss in volume and weight. In physical
properties, no change is observed between mulberry and tasar in
terms of bending length, flexural rigidity and tenacity, while
crease recovery decreases [19, 32]. The shape of force-
14
displacement curve changes significantly by degumming with
decrease in initial slope and proportional limit. Changes in
degree orientation and amorphous function in the fibroin is
difficult to measure after the degumming process [33]. Enzyme
degumming results in the separation of the twin filaments,
evident from the microscopic analysis [2]. The dull appearance
and stiff handle of raw fabric disappears and becomes shiny, soft
and scroopy. Mechanical agitation during treatment has proved to
change the aesthetics, tactile, thermal, comfort properties of
the fabrics.
In hard water, the degumming loss increases with increase in
concentration of detergent while no significant increase could be
observed in distilled water. During degumming not only sericin
but also waxes are also removed from the material leaving it
highly absorptive to dyes and chemicals. As the degumming time
increases, whiteness, K/S and fastness grade also increased [34].
In soap degumming process, with increasing time, the weight loss
also increases. Tenacity initially increases and then decreases
with decrease in elongation at break to a marginal extent [35].
15
Degumming of silk with papain results in more dye uptake, in the
case of reactive dyes, 1:1 metal complex dyes. Papain results in
a weight loss of 12-15% even with higher times than with alcalase
under similar conditions, which could be the possible reason for
the higher dye uptake of [34]. Alkaline, acidic and neutral
proteases have different specificity, which are evident from the
molecular weight and its distribution of sericin obtained from
these enzymes [2]. A comparative study of oxidative stable
endopeptidase, bacterial high alkaline strain, papain,
aspergillus pepsin I [2, 23, 36, 37, 38], which revealed very low
degumming efficiency (7.6 % weight loss) in the case of acid
protease compared to the alkali protease.
In the case of acid degummed silk, presence of residual acid
inhibit the dissociation of nucleophilic groups in the fibroin
and thus reduces the reactivity of reactive dyes especially in
the case of vinyl sulphone dyes [24, 39]. Degumming, with
organic acids, results in steep weight loss at high temperatures
and at shorter duration. In acid degummed silk, high tenacity is
16
observed in 30 minute than at higher duration and very high acid
concentration leads to degradation of the sample. Table 6
compares the properties of acid degummed silk with soap degummed
samples.
17
Table 6 Comparison between acid and soap degummed Silk
Parameter Soap Tartaricacid
Degumming Loss(%)
21.5 23.0
Tenacity (g/d) 3.3 3.7Modulus (g/d) 71.1 90.8Strain (%) 12.5 13.0
Assessment methods of degummed silk involve staining techniques,
dissolution methods and physical examinations [1, 4, 5, 6, 40,
41, 42, 43]. The physical methods of assessment include
assessment through handle evaluation, difference in weight of the
material before and after the degumming process and microscopic
examination for change in the cross section. Neocarmine W (Merk)
stains degummed silk into golden yellow and sericin to red.
Picrocarmine colours sericin red and fibroin yellow [20]. Sirium
Red F 3B 200 (Bayer) stains sericin into red colour and degummed
silk remains colourless in this treatment. Sericin in the
partially degummed silk and degummed silk can be identified by
staining with a mixture of CI Acid Blue 40 and CI Acid Orange 56
at 20o C for 10 min. Silk containing more than 10% sericin is
coloured yellow-red, and with less than 10% is coloured blue [5].
18
Degummed silk with more of fibroin can be dissolved in Cuoxam
while sericin remains undissolved. Ninhydrin test is carried out
the identification of primary amine groups. Alpha amino acids,
except proline, react with tri-ketohydrindene hydrate known as
ninhydrin [44]. Purple colour imino derivatives obtained in this
reaction gives an indication of amino acids, which are generally
colourless (Fig. 1).
In the alkali and soap degumming process, degumming co-efficient
(k) of the process depends on factors such as temperature,
denier, agitation, liquor ratio, and the nature of soap and
alkali [1]. For alkalis, the coefficient is nearly independent
of concentration but for soaps, the coefficient decreases with
increasing concentration. The order of effectiveness of some
common alkali is 984 for sodium hydroxide, 827 for sodium
carbonate and 173 for sodium bicarbonate. With soaps, the
19
Fig. 1 Ninhydrin Reaction
degumming coefficient varies from 208 to 516 as the normality of
the solution decreases from 0.032 to 0.004.
Fixation of Sericin and Partial Degumming
Partial fixation or complete fixation of sericin using suitable
cross linking agents prior to degumming, improves the breaking
strength of the material. Fixation is due to the reaction between
amino groups in the proteins and cross linking agent, which
result in poor luster and low degree of whiteness. Cross linking
agents to fix up the sericin include cyanuric chloride,
triglycidyl isocyanurate or hexamethylene diisocynate, N, N
dihydroxy ethylene bisacrylamide, glutaraldehyde but they also
lead to significant discolouration [1, 14]. Chromium salts,
potassium oxalto chromate have, also, been used for this purpose.
Frequently entire silk sericin is not removed and only the
quantities sufficient to make the silk soft and lustrous and
workable in dyeing and bleaching are removed [13, 15, 45]. Cuite
silk represents completely degummed silk, souple silk is defined
as the silk in which the sericin is removed to 10 – 15% and 2 –
5% of the sericin from the raw silk is removed in the case of
20
ecru silk. Half- boiled silk becomes bulky with the residual gum
present in the silk acting as a weak acid and helps in absorbing
more quantities of dyes without any difference in the fastness.
The exhaustion and colour strength of partially degummed silk are
significantly higher than fully degummed silk. The advantages of
partial degumming process [45] include sizing-free weaving
operation, improved colour strength and savings in amount of dye,
no deterioration in fastness properties, greater economy and
reduced pollution.
Applications of Silk Sericin
Silk sericin has potential applications in various fields, which
includes medicine, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics [46]. Silk
sericin blended with polyvinyl alcohol has the ability to form
hydrogel with good mechanical strength and water resistance.
Silk sericin membranes with their good biocompatibility and
adequate flexibility, can be used for wound healing and skin
scaffolds and artificial skin. Sulphonated sericin show
antithrombotic effect. Sericin grafted with methyl methacrylate
or styrene can be used for contact lenses. Sericin containing
21
foods can relieve constipation, accelerates mineral absorption
and suppress bowel cancer and also has anti-tumor activity. In
the cosmetic front, sericin is used in skin, hair and nail
cosmetics. Skin lotions, creams and ointments have the ability
to reduce the wrinkles, aging effects and retain elasticity,
prevent epidermal water loss.
References
1. Marsh J.T. An Introduction to Textile Bleaching, Asia
Publishing, London 1945, 391 – 421
2. Freddi G., Mosotti R., Innocenti R., J. of Biotechnology, 106
(2003) 101 – 112
3. Nalankilli G., Man Made Textiles in India, 37 (1) 1994 11 – 16
4. Flensberg H., Hammers I., Chemiefasern 1987 (11) XV – XX
5. Robson R.M., Fiber Chemistry, Marcel Decker, New York, 2nd
edition, 415 -465
6. Encyclopedia of Textile Finishing (A-F) Springer Publication
2001, German, 496 – 497
7. Murugesh Babu K., Ph.D. Thesis, IIT Delhi, July 2001.
22
8. Hofstetter R., “Modern Silk Finishing”, Melliand English 1991
(5) E151 – E153
9. Encyclopedia of Textile Finishing (A-F) Springer, 2001, German
Page 497
10. Sah N., Textile Dyer and
Printer, March 31, 1993 23 – 25
11. Mc Intyre J.E., Daniel,
P.N., Textile Terms and Definitions 10th Edition 1997 page 93
12. Gulrajani M.L., Gupta S.,
Dyeing, Printing and Finishing, IIT, New Delhi 1989, 54 – 85
13. Lacasse K., Baumann W.,
Textile Chemicals , Springer Publication 2004, 125 – 126
14. Bianchi A.S., Colonna
G.M., Melliand English 1992 (1) E30 – E32, 68 – 75
15. Nalankilli G., The Indian
Textile Journal, C1 (9) 1992 68 – 71
16. Nadiger G.S., Halliyar
V.G., Colourage, Oct 4, 1984, 23 – 32
17. Shankarachary R.R.,
Colourage, Oct 4, 1984, 34 - 40
23
18. Sharma I.C., Chattopadhyay
D.P., Mukhopadhyay A., Bourah R.K., Viswanath, Indian J. of
Fibres and Textile Res. 24 (4) 1999 209 – 293
19. Liddiard A.G., J. of Soc.
of Dyers and Colorists, 98 (11) 1982, 394 – 397
20. Gulrajani M.L., Gupta
S.V., Gupta A., Suri., Indian J.of Fibres &
Text.Res.24(4)1996, 270
21. Kawahara Y., Text. Res.
Journal 68 (5) 1998 385
22. Curie R., Silk, Mohair,
Cashmere and Other Luxury Fibres, CRC Press, England 2001,1–7
23. Gulrajani M.L., Sethi S.,
Gupta S., J. of Soc. of Dyers and Colorists, 108(2) 1992 79 –
86
24. Sonwalkar T.N., Prabhu J.,
Colourage, 1992 (7) 37 – 40
25. Shukla S.R., IJFTR,. 26
(2) 2001 116 -124
24
26. Nalankilli G., The Indian
Textile Journal, C3 (12) 1992 139 – 143
27. Krasowski A., Muller B.,
Fohles J., Hocker H., Melliand Text. 1999 80(6)543–543
28. Gulrajani M.L., Agarwal
R.,Grover A., Suri M., IJFTR, 25 (1) 2000 69 -74
29. Saligram A.N., Shah S.M.,
Sharma R.K., Shukla S.R., Am., Dye. Rep.1993 (4) 34 – 38
30. Saligram A.N., Sawani
P.B., Shukla S.R., Nadiger G.S., Am. Dye. Rep. 1998(11) 47–49
31. Brzezinski S., Malinowska
S., Melliand English 1989 (4) E120 – E121, 291 – 294
32. Rigueiro J.P., Elices M.,
LLorca J. Viney C., J.of App. Poly Sci., 84 (2002) 1431 – 1437
33. Onar N., SarnsikM., 3rd
Indo-Czech Textile Res. Conference, 14 -16 TUT, Czech 2004
34. Reddy G.V.R., Krishnan
T.A., Indian Silk 2003 (10) 26 – 28
35. Chopra S., Gulrajani M.L.,
Indian J. of Fibre and Text. Res., 19 (2) 1994 76 – 83
25
36. Lacasse K., Baumann W.,
Textile Chemicals, Springer Publication 2004, 125 – 126
37. Gulrajani M.L., Sen S.,
Indian J. of Fibre and Text. Res., 21(1) 1998 52 – 58
38. Freddi G., Allara G.,
Candiani G., 112 (7-8) 1996, 191 – 195
39. Pathak S., Prabhu J.,
Somasekhar., Indian J. of Fibres & Text.Res., 21 (4) 1996,
283–285
40. http://www.pi-
info.med9.com/picric.htm, accessed on 20.09.2006
41. http://www.cem.msu.edu/
`reusch/virtualText/protein.htm, accessed on 20.09.2006
42. Nalankilli G., Textile
Trends, 33 (9) 1990, 29 – 31
43. Nalankilli G., The Indian
Journal of Fibre and Textile Research, 19 (3) 1992, 129 – 134
44. Prabhu J., Sanne S.,
Somasekar T.H., J. of Soc. Dyers and Col., 111 (7-8) 1995 245–
247
26