Cities - Urban Geography
Transcript of Cities - Urban Geography
New York City in fiction
Today: „Sex and the City,‟ „Friends‟ & „How I
met your mother‟
– City is a space for adventure, leisure, creativity,
consumption. A prosperous space
„Law and Order‟ & „Teenage Mutant Ninja
Turtles‟
– City is a dangerous space, crime, decay, gritty
Why do we have cities?
Markets for excess food production
– Better agriculture meant we didn‟t all need to be farmers!
– New opportunities for commerce, production, control, trade, thought, belief (easier to do these things when clustered together)
Defence
Religion
Consumption – markets for products
Trade
Production
Government
Finance
What are cities and why are they important?
Louis Wirth: a city is a – relatively large,
– dense,
– and permanent settlement
– of socially heterogeneous individuals
Growing percentage of world population currently lives in cities
2008 – half the world‟s population lives in cities
As Geographers, what could we add to this definition?
Land use, division of space
Activities/functions
– Residential, commercial, administrative etc.
Connectivity, infrastructure
– From ancient roads to mobile phones
Relationship to hinterland, other places
Kingsley Davis – The Urbanization of the Human Population
Why does urbanisation occur?
Rural settlements reclassified as towns? (rare)
Births exceed deaths (low-birth rates, high mortality)
Rural to urban migration
S curve
Urbanisation has a beginning and end point – Urban growth has no end point
K Davis and Industrialisation
Agriculture – land is the prime instrument of
production – spread out
Non-agricultural activities: use land as a site
(of production, consumption etc)
– Cluster together (agglomerations)
– Specialisation
Developing world: similar process, but rates
of population growth much higher
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
Indonesia
Netherlands
Urbanisation Rates 1960 - 2010 The Netherlands and Indonesia
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
19
60
19
61
19
62
19
63
19
64
19
65
19
66
19
67
19
68
19
69
19
70
19
71
19
72
19
73
19
74
19
75
19
76
19
77
19
78
19
79
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
Belgium
France
Germany
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Urbanisation rates 1960 - 2010 Selected European countries
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
19
60
19
61
19
62
19
63
19
64
19
65
19
66
19
67
19
68
19
69
19
70
19
71
19
72
19
73
19
74
19
75
19
76
19
77
19
78
19
79
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
Canada
United States
Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Mexico
Urbanisation rates 1960 - 2010 Selected North and South American countries
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
19601962196419661968197019721974197619781980198219841986198819901992199419961998200020022004200620082010
Indonesia
Papua New Guinea
Malaysia
Philippines
Thailand
Urbanisation rates 1960 - 2010 South East Asia
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
South Korea
Nigeria
Turkey
China
India
Malawi
Urbanisation rates 1960 -2010 Other selected countries
Question:
How can you explain the development of
spatial land use in Yogyakarta?
Do you see any trends or patterns?
– i.e. zones, rings, corridors, centres?
Urban land-use models
Bid rent curve (Alonso, 1960)
Concentric zone model (Burgess, 1925)
Sectoral model (Hoyt, 1939)
Bid-rent theory
W. Alonso (1960)
Central locations most wanted
Firms/households compete
Highest bid gets most central location
Retail and office generally have highest bids
Trade-off living space/commuting costs
Concentric zone model
E.W. Burgess (1925)
Distribution of social groups within urban areas
Correlation between distance from CBD and wealth of inhabited area
Based on Chicago‟s urban structure
Sectoral model
H. Hoyt (1939)
Urban expansion along
transportation arteries rather
than concentric rings
Rich and poor sections of
cities are segregated
Based urban structure of 40
US cities
The Rise and Fall of Cities
19th Century: Rapid Industrialisation
– Rapid population growth
20th Century: Escape from industrial city
– Modernist ideas for a better urban life
Urban decline in the post-war decades
20th Century Responses
Bro
adacre
City
Ga
rde
n
City
Vill
e
Rad
ieuse
Anti-urban
(decentralist)
Pro-urban
(centralist)
Garden city (Ebenezer Howard)
Ebenezer Howard (1898)
Main principles: – Limited in size
– Self-contained
– Much recreational space
– Range of social institutions
– Segregation of land use
– Land owned by municipality
Examples: Letchworth (1903), Welwyn (1920)
Also applied in many new towns and on local levels („garden neighbourhoods‟)
Post-war Garden Cities: New Towns movement
Milton Keynes (near London)
East Kilbride (near Glasgow)
– Abercrombie Report
Zoetermeer (near The Hague)
– Bedroom community („slaapstad‟) for DH
Amsterdam: Western Garden Cities
(Westelijke tuinsteden)
Ville Radieuse (Le Corbusier)
Satellite towns
Business centre /CBD
Train station
Houses
Factories
Warehouses/distribution
Heavy industry
Ville Radieuse (2)
Le Corbusier (1935)
Main principles: – Large-scale high-rise public housing in green environment
(„towers in the park‟, vertical garden cities)
– Emphasis on geometrics (radial and grid patterns)
– Large industrial zones, seperation of functions (housing, working, recreation, traffic)
– Social mix, collectivism, anti-chaos (strictly regulated, hierarchical society)
Based on CIAM principles: Congres Internationaux d‟Architecture Moderne (1928-1959)
Examples: original plan was never executed, but main principles are applied in e.g. Parisian suburbs, Marseille, Bijlmermeer (Amsterdam)
Postwar influence: Bijlmer, Amsterdam
Egalitarian ideals
Better housing for
ordinary people
Initially very popular
– Big flats, clean,
green space
Quickly declined
Broadacre City
Frank Llyod Wright (1932)
Main principle: solving urban problems by radical decentralisation
Inspired by new technologies (cars, phone)
Ideological: every individual has right to his own acre; back to traditional lifestyle
American vision; hardly pursued in European planning
Edge cities (Garreau) as unplanned or incomplete versions of Broadacre City
So things weren’t looking so good for cities
Post-war period
Suburbanisation
White flight
Redlining
Slum clearances
Deindustrialisation – Job losses
Cities seen as: – Crime
– Decay
– Poverty
Urban resurgence?
Late 20th Century: a return to the city?
– Deindustrialisation (cleaner)
– Changing household preferences
– Changing economic drivers
– Changing land use
– Changing policy ideas
– End of modernism?
Gentrification
„Gentrification is the most politically-loaded
word in urban geography‟ (Davidson and
Lees, 2005)
What is Gentrification?
Ruth Glass, London Sociologist (1964): “One by one many of the working class quarters of
London have been invaded by the middle class…have been taken over when their leases expired, and have become elegant, expensive residences…once this process of „gentrification‟ starts in a district it goes on rapidly until all or most of the working class occupiers are displaced and the whole social character of the district is changed”
(Source: Glass, (1964) London: Aspects of Change)
Neil Smith, Scottish/American Geographer
“
Gentrification is no longer about a narrow and
quixotic oddity in the housing market but has
become the leading residential edge of a
much larger endeavour; the class remake of
the central urban landscape.” Source: Smith (1996) The New Urban Frontier. p.39
Brian Doucet
“An upward class transformation and the
creation of affluent space.” Source: Doucet (2010) Rich cities with poor people: waterfront
regeneration in the Netherlands and Scotland‟
What is Gentrification?
Physical – Upgrading/restoring of old property
– New-build luxury (later)
– Change in retail structure
Spatial – Older inner-city neighbourhoods – proximity to
centre
– Working class districts
– Initially in global cities (London, New York)
– Now global phenomenon
What is Gentrification?
Social – Displacement of poor population
– Class transformation (from poor to middle class)
– Character/function of the neighbourhood changes
Actors – Individual households (sweat equity)
– Developers/investors
– Governments (urban restructuring/state strategy)
Represents upward neighbourhood change
Explanations: Supply Side
Neil Smith
The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. (1996)
Gentrification is a back to the city movement of capital, not people
Production factors
Disinvestment in inner city
„Frontiers of Capital‟
Explanations: Demand Side
David Ley, Canadian Geographer
The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City (1996)
Changes in demand preferences, lifestyles, demographics causes gentrification
Old working class housing remade as symbols of middle class success
Islington, North London, January 2009
Selling Gentrification
Urban professional lifestyle is sold to potential consumers
Media – TV shows: Sex and the City, Fraser, Cosby Show
– Movies: Notting Hill, Bridget Jones‟ Diary
– New York: from crime to glamour
Advertising - Westside Lofts
Evolution of Gentrification
Gentrification moved beyond Ruth Glass‟ observations
– Waves of gentrification (Hackworth and Smith)
Big business (role of developers)
Role of government – municipally-led
Further away from city centre (also new-build)
Lack of criticism