Annual Report FY-2005-06.pdf

Program Management Unit Annual Monitoring Report 2005-06

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This report aims to provide an account of physical and

financial achievements made during the second year (2005-06)

of the program implementation. It encompasses district wise

information along with details of activities, performed for

execution of works on watercourses. It also analyzes the

quantum of work accomplished against the targets assigned for the year. Given

the magnitude & the size of the Project, naturally, it required a lot of data

collection, information analysis & commitment on part of the entire team

members of Program Management Unit (PMU).

This annual report in your hand, is the result of team efforts of all the

PMU officers and officials. The report in its present form would not have been

possible without the dedicated efforts, commitment & support of all them. I am

appreciative of the professional input & analysis of Dr. Ijaz Mansoor, Director

(Finance). I also thank Hafiz Muhammad Ilyas, Director (M&E) and Mr. Tariq

Mahmood Assistant Director (M&E) for their contribution. In addition, all the

officers viz. Mr. Hassan Abdullah Khan, Director (MIS), Mr. Ijaz Ahmed Minhas,

Deputy Director (Finane), Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Kharal, Assistant Project Director, Dr.

Ahmad Afnan, Assistant Director (Admin) made substantial contribution in

bringing out this report. My thanks and appreciations are especially due for Mr.

Zafar Abbas, Deputy Director (Technical), Mr. Ahmad Kamal, Assistant Director

(Technical) and Mr. Yasir Mushtaq, Assistant who have been a driving force

behind this report, giving sterling service in preparing this report and were

extremely helpful in providing any information that was needed. Infact, efforts

of all these officers made this document worth reading. I hope that they shall

continue to work in their respective areas of responsibility in a highly

professional and zealous manner as they have been doing, this before.

National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component) i

(Dr. Pervez Ahmed Khan) Project Director /

Additional Secretary to CM


National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component) ii


National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component) iii

CONTENTS

SECTION Page No.

1 Acknowledgements i

2 Contents iii

3 Abbreviations & Acronyms iv

4 Executive Summary v

5 Performance Analysis for the year 2005 – 06 1-148

6 Fixation & Analysis of Construction Material Rates 149-156

7 Financial Aspects of NPIW – Demanding Attention 157-161

8 Performance Management System – A Prime Challenge 162-174

9 Role of Media – Building the Motivation Level of Farmers 175-184

10 The Role of Water User Associations (WUAs) 185-188

11 Management Information Services (MIS) at PMU 189-199

12 Implementation of LAN / WAN at PMU 200-210

13 Precast Parabolic Lining (PCPL) 211-218

14 Activities of the Program (Pictorial View) 219-225

15 Introduction of Officers of PMU 226-


National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component) iv

ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS

AAE ARM DAO DCO DIC DGA (WM) DO DRAC EDO EIS F&P FCRs FGW FITMAS GIS ICR-I ICR-II LAN MIS MonEva NPIW NRSP NTC OFWM PAFs PC PC-I PCPL PITD PMS PMU PRSP PSDP PWMC RM SGW TBAP TERMS W/C WAN WM WMO WUAs

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Assistant Agriculture Engineer Assistant Regional Manager District Accounts Officer District Coordination Officer District Implementation Committee Director General Agriculture (Water Management) District Officer District Rates Assessment Committee Executive District Officer Enterprise Information Service Finance & Planning Department Final Completion Reports Fresh Ground Water Financial Tracking & Monitoring System Graphical Information System Initial Completion Report-I Initial Completion Report-II Local Area Network Management Information Services Monitoring & Evaluation Application National Program for Improvement of Watercourses National Rural Support Program National Telecommunication Corporation On Farm Water Management Performance Appraisal Forms Punjab Component Planning Commission Proforma-I Precast Parabolic Lining Performance Management System Punjab Information Technology Department Program Management Unit Punjab Rural Support Program Public Sector Development Program Punjab Water Management Consultants Regional Manager Saline Ground Water Time Bound Action Plan Technical Rectification & Monitoring System Watercourse Wide Area Network Water Management Water Management Officer Water User Associations


National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component) v

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This Annual Monitoring Report reflects on salient aspects of performance

of NPIW (PC) during the second year of its execution i.e. FY 2005-06. In this

year, chasing an assigned target of 5000 watercourses & Irrigation schemes, the

NPIW (PC) registered completion of 5015 watercourses & irrigation schemes in

terms of final certifications by PWMC. As such this is the second consecutive

year that the assigned targets have been met. The FY 2005-06 target (5000) was

more than twice the target of FY 2004-05 (2000). As FY 2005-06 is characterized

by deployment of requisite Human Resources as envisaged in PC-I, achievements

in current financial year may, therefore, define the limits of performance and

capacity of On Farm Water Management.

During the year under review, both the executing agencies i.e.

OFWM/District Governments have achieved 102% whereas PRSP/NRSP managed

to attain 88% of their targets respectively. Briefly speaking, OFWM was assigned

a target of 4025 watercourses & 350 irrigation schemes against which they

achieved 4101 (102%) & 364 (104%) respectively. The completion as such stands

at 102% of the target. Similarly, the work outsourced to NRSP/PRSP comprised of

275 watercourses & 350 irrigation schemes, their achievements stood at 240

(87%) & 310 (89%) respectively. The completion as such stands at 88% of the

target. The target of 5000 watercourses & irrigation schemes was 250% than last

year’s target of 2000, yet given the deployment status of NPIW staff, the target

was not an uphill task. As a matter of fact, availability of 1371 operational

supervisors (NPIW & OFWM combined) translates into 3.3 watercourses per

supervisor; much less than initially conceived average of 5 watercourses per

supervisor (in OFWM). Availability of financial resources with the Federal

Government played a major role in achievement of the said target.

Second major indicator that directly hints that the services of NPIW &

water management staff were under-utilized is hyperactive, accelerated pace at

which the work is done in the last quarter. This shows that the staff was not

performing at their peak output level during the entire year. Against all the


National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component) vi

attempts by the executing department for planning & scheduling of work, most

of the work remained concentrated in second half of the year, especially the

last quarter. This is evident from the fact that 26% of ICR-I, 93% of ICR-II & 99%

of FCRs were submitted after March 2006 i.e. last quarter & onwards.

Erratic pace of work poses some unusual challenges. Interestingly, the last

quarter of the financial year (April-June) coincides with wheat harvesting season

when farmer community is neither inclined to devote time, energy & effort

towards watercourse improvement work nor is there plenty of labour available.

Moreover, in order to certify the release of second government installment, and

final completion report, engineers of PWMC have to physically visit the site &

take measurements. An achievement of 5015 watercourses/irrigation schemes

translates into 20,060 mandatory visits by PWMC engineers certifying each phase

and enabling the work to progress into next phase. A look at the daily progress

report transpires that out of 20,060 certifications, 51% were conducted after

March, 2006 i.e. last quarter & onwards. Sudden increase of work followed by

submission of ICR-II & FCRs caused undue strain on PWMC staff. This

phenomenon may well be appreciated by noting the fact that during one day i.e.

on 24-06-2005, 1720 FCRs were submitted to PWMC that accounts for 42% of the

entire year’s work. In the last three months of the financial year, PMWC had to

certify almost 4400 cases of ICR-II & 4865 cases of FCRs in sharp contrast with

613 ICR-II & 149 FCRs during the first nine months of the year.

For certain purposes, watercourse improvement work has been divided

into various phases. Quantum of work and effort in each phase gives a clear

indication that collection of share by the farmers and especially earthen

improvement of katcha section done by the farmers is the step that is not so

easier. This component of the program has gone so wayward that now the

district governments are regularly employing the Revenue machinery to keep

progress on track. It also reflects upon the efficacy of role of WMOs and the

approaches undertaken by the Agriculture Department in mobilizing and

generating awareness amongst the farmers. In future, this factor may become a

significant bottleneck unless some critical confidence building measures are


National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component) vii

introduced to revive the interest of farmer’s community leading to voluntary

undertaking of work and sharing of their contribution.

The need for re-validating, refreshing & updating the current inventory of

all the watercourses has assumed greater importance. With each passing year, it

is becoming difficult to identify sufficient number of watercourses for

improvement. This exercise of refreshing the inventory may take a while to

complete, it is therefore, imperative that spade work is started at the earliest.

Throughout the year, Program Management Unit continued to play its role

of coordinating, facilitating & monitoring at various tiers. At district & field

team level, the Regional Managers & Assistant Regional Managers, through

countless interventions, field visits and meetings played their role, interalia,

motivating the district functionaries and ensuring that the quality of works is not

compromised at any stage. PMU head office played the key role in providing

strategic & tactical leadership simultaneously interacting with Federal

Government, Provincial Agriculture Department, OFWM Directorate General

(Agriculture) and 35 District Governments. In more than 7000 references that

the PMU initiated during FY 2005-06, all types of issues relating to policy

matters, quality aspects, human resource management etc. were taken up with

the relevant stakeholders.

Concept of monitoring & evaluation in public sector in developing

countries is not configured & employed on modern lines. PMU team, however,

attempted to introduce MIS concepts & tools within monitoring, coordination &

facilitation framework, thus enriching its scope & dimensions. To add a flavor of

objectivity, visual aids to monitoring were introduced. All the Regional Offices

have been equipped with latest image capturing devices (camcorders). Aspects

of monitoring that can be visually captured are received by the Headquarter and

are analyzed & fed into a rectification mechanism. Besides,

watercourses/irrigation schemes improved during FY 2005-06 have been

captured as a visual evidence of the works done as well as serving as an aid to

future impact analysis exercises. A total of 6956 pictures capturing 2646


National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component) viii

watercourses / irrigation schemes were aggregated in an organized database

designed with the help of MIS Wing along with essential identifiers.

Upon completion of project cycle for two years i.e. FY 2004-05 & 2005-06,

next financial year 2006-07 would prove a test case for Sponsors, Executors &

Monitors alike to exhibit performance reflective of & based upon the lessons

learnt during previous years. It would also test our abilities to exhibit

adaptability & dynamic re-fixing of priorities necessitated by the past

experiences.


National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component) 1

2005 - 06PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

ANALYSIS PAGE NO

PUNJAB OVERVIEW 02-03

OFWM OVERVIEW 04-06

PRSP/NRSP OVERVIEW 07-08

OFWM REGION WISE 09-32

• GRAPHICAL MEASURES 33-35

OFWM DISTRICT WISE 36-140

• GRAPHICAL MEASURES 141-148



PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW OF PUNJAB During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, Punjab achieved 127% of the targets by completing 2541 watercourses / schemes against the assigned target of 2000.

During the year under review, the performance has been excellent. The target was set 2.5 times than last year, i.e. 5000, yet Punjab registered completion / verification of 5015 watercourses / schemes (100.3%). Overall Watercourse Statistics:

Improved under NPIW Total W/Cs Improved Un-

improved

Planned for improvement under NPIW FY 2004-5 FY 2005-6 Total

Remaining W/Cs

*57879 24405 33474 27557 2209 4341 6550 21007

Barani Areas 332 674 1006 -

Total (irrigated & barani) 2541 5015 7556 -

* b e c au s e o f n e w f i g u r e s i n N an k a n a S a h i b

Civil Works executed in FY 2005-06 (major indicators):

IRRIGATED BARANI TOTAL

Target FY 2005-06: 4300 700 5000

Achievement / FCRs verified: 4341 (101%) 674 (96%) 5015 (100.3%)

Quantum of Civil Works (Verified):

Irrigated Area:

Earthen improved length: 12803 km

Lined length: 3698 km (0.85 km per w/c)

Total length of 4341 w/cs: 16500 km

Nakkas installed (Nos.): 176517 (40.7 per w/c)

Culverts constructed (Nos.): 8616 (1.98 per w/c)

Av. length of improved w/c: 3.80 km

Barani Area:

Total lining of 674 schemes: 270.37 km

Water storage tanks (Nos.): 34


Culverts constructed (Nos.): 13

Av. lining of improved schemes: 0.40 km



This graph depicts the percentage lining of the watercourses improved & verified in the irrigated area.

Utilization of Funds in Civil Works:

In the Irrigated area, on an average, Rs. 632,882 have been expended on each watercourse as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 743.

In the Barani area, on an average, Rs. 134,648 have been expended on each scheme as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 335.

Government Funds (Rs.) Av. material cost (Rs.) Area Verified

w/cs

Farmers' share

Deposited (Rs.) Utilized on verified w/cs per w/c per meter

Irrigated 4341 740,003,000 2,747,341,126 632,882 743

Barani 674 56,365,000 90,752,520 134,648 335

Total 5015 796,368,000 2,838,093,646 - -

Bricklining %age

78% 22%

BrickliningEarthen works



PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW OF OFWM (PUNJAB)

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, On-Farm Water Management (OFWM) overall achieved 129% of the targets by completing 2350 watercourses / schemes against the assigned target of 1820.

During the year under review, the performance has been excellent. The target was set to 2.4 times than last year, i.e. 4375, yet OFWM registered completion / verification of 4465 watercourses / schemes (102%) with the deployment of following staff.

AAEs/DDOs : 242 WMOs : 256 Supervisors : 1371 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.3 watercourses

Overall Watercourse Statistics:

Improved under NPIW

FY 2004-5 FY 2005-6 Total

Irrigated Areas 2122 4101 6223

Barani Areas 228 364 592

Total (irrigated & barani) 2350 4465 6815



Target FY 2005-06: 4025 350 4375

Civil works undertaken: 4495 379 4874

FCRs submitted: 4207 367 4574

Achievement / FCRs verified: 4101 (102%) 364 (104%) 4465 (102%)

Watercourses deferred: 106 3 109


Irrigated Area:




167710 (40.9 per w/c)





Barani Area:






This graph depicts the percentage lining of the watercourses improved & verified in the irrigated area under OFWM.

PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS: PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse / scheme in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 4375 translates into 17500 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 9648 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months.

Bricklining %age

78% 22%BrickliningEarthen works

ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR Verifications

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Veri

ficat

ions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR



FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, A sum of Rs. 3381.16 million was allocated to the OFWM under various heads, against which Rs. 2962.85 million (88.6%) were utilized.

Head Allocation (Rs.) Exp. (Rs.) Balance (Rs.) Utilization

Establishment Charges 391,566,429 264,178,770 127,387,659 67% Purchase of Durable Goods 3,949,417 3,501,505 447,912 89% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 46,728,356 32,643,510 14,084,846 70% Civil Works (Irrigated) 2,880,702,685 *2,612,203,000 268,499,685 91% Civil Works (Barani) 58,217,792 *50,326,825 7,890,967 86% Total Civil Works 2,938,920,477 *2,662,529,825 280,390,679 91%

Total 3,381,164,679 2,962,853,610 418,311,069 88%

*Total Amount transferred to WUAs for Civil Works.


An amount of Rs. 2,938.92 million was allocated for civil works, against which an amount of Rs. 2,662.52 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 90% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses / schemes.



Government Funds (Rs.) Av. material cost (Rs.) Area

Civil works started

Verified w/cs

Farmers' share

Deposited (Rs.) Allocated Transferred to WUAs

Utilized on verified w/cs

Verified Utilization

%age per w/c per meter

Irrigated 4495 4101 725,705,000 2,880,702,685 2,612,203,000 2,606,329,102 90% 635,535 745

Barani 379 364 14,298,000 58,217,792 50,326,825 52,670,908 90% 144,700 330

Total 4874 4465 740,003,000 2,938,920,477 2,662,529,825 2,659,000,010 90% - -

Status of Recovery from WUAs (Irrigated & Barani Areas):

Recovery due for FY 2004-05 : 34,737,282


Total recoverable amount : 110,015,458

Amount recovered : 86,633,332

Amount yet to be recovered (Rs.) : 23,382,126

Cost Sharing (Govt & Farmers)

22%

78% Farmers'ShareGovt's

Share



PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW OF PRSP/NRSP (PUNJAB)

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, PRSP / NRSP achieved 106% of the targets by completing 191 watercourses / schemes against the assigned target of 180.

During the year under review, the performance is satisfactory. The target was set to 3.5 times than last year, i.e. 625, yet the region registered completion / verification of 550 watercourses / schemes (88%).


Improved under NPIW

FY 2004-5 FY 2005-6 Total

Irrigated Areas 87 240 327

Barani Areas 104 310 414

Total (irrigated & barani) 191 550 741



Target FY 2005-06: 275 350 625



Irrigated Area:

Earthen improved length: 680.9 km

Lined length: 201.3 km (0.84 km per w/c)

Total length of 240 w/cs: 882.3 km




Barani Area:








This graph depicts the percentage lining of the watercourses improved & verified in the irrigated area under PRSP/NRSP.




Government Funds (Rs.) Av. material cost (Rs.) Area Verified

w/cs

Farmers' share

Deposited (Rs.) Utilized on verified w/cs per w/c per meter

Irrigated 240 53,339,000 141,012,024 746,224 700

Barani 310 3.026,000 38,081,612 122,844 343

Total 550 56,365,000 179,093,636 - -

Bricklining %age




BAHAWALPUR REGION

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this region overall achieved 103% of the targets by completing 282 watercourses against the assigned target of 274.

During the year under review, the performance is appreciable. The target was set to 3.3 times than last year, i.e. 910 watercourses, yet the region registered completion / verification of 930 watercourses (102%) with the deployment of following staff.


:

3.25 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

13289 5723 7566 6743 282 930 1212 5531


Target FY 2005-06: 910

Civil works undertaken: 994

FCRs submitted: 940

Achievement / FCRs verified: 930 (102% of the target)

Watercourses deferred: 10










This graph depicts the percentage lining of the watercourses improved & verified in the region.

PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS: PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercouse in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 910 translates into 3640 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 2111 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months. FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, A sum of Rs. 793.78 million was allocated to the region under various heads, against which Rs. 692.48 million (87%) were utilized.


Establishment Charges 87,265,358 58,481,745 28,783,613 67% Purchase of Durable Goods 2,340 0 2,340 0% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 9,274,418 5,187,398 4,087,020 56% Civil Works (Total) 697,238,130 *628,813,360 68,424,770 90% Total 793,780,246 692,482,503 101,297,743 87%


Bricklining %age

73%27%BrickliningEarthen works


-50

150

350

550

750

950

1150

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR




An amount of Rs. 697.23 million was allocated for civil works in the region, against which an amount of Rs. 628.81 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 95% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses.

In the region, on average, Rs. 711,461 have been expended on each watercourse as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 747.

Government Funds (Rs.) Av. material cost (Rs.) Civil works started

Verified w/cs

Farmers' share




%age per W/C per meter

962 930 194,368,000 697,238,130 628,813,360 661,658,738 95% 711,461 747

Status of Recovery from WUAs:0







24%


Share



DERA GHAZI KHAN REGION

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this region achieved 100% of the targets by completing 230 watercourses against the assigned target of 230. During the year under review, the performance is again good. The target was 2.7 times than last year, i.e. 627 watercourses, yet the region registered completion / verification of 625 watercourses (99.7%) with the deployment of following staff.


:

2.8 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

10765 5110 5655 4954 230 625 855 4100


Target FY 2005-06: 627


FCRs submitted: 628

Achievement / FCRs verified: 625 (99.7% of the target)












PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS: PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 627 translates into 2508 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 1295 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months.

FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, A sum of Rs. 547.69 million was allocated to the region under various heads, against which Rs. 501.37 million (92%) were utilized.


Establishment Charges 64,296,600 44,062,211 20,234,389 69% Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 6,325,640 5,643,181 682,459 89% Civil Works (Total) 477,070,996 *451,664,880 25,406,116 95% Total 547,693,236 501,370,272 46,322,964 92%


Bricklining %age

74%26%



-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR





In the region, on an average, Rs. 572,413 have been expended on each watercourse as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 710.


Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





675 625 97,450,000 477,070,996 451,664,880 357,758,333 75% 572,413 710

Status of Recovery from WUAs:







18%82%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



FAISALABAD REGION


During the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. The target was set to 1.2 times than last year, i.e. 440 watercourses, yet the region registered completion / verification of 438 watercourses (99.5%) with the deployment of following staff.


:

3.1 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

6479 3493 2986 2509 338 438 776 1733


Target FY 2005-06: 440


FCRs submitted: 458







Nakkas installed (Nos.): 5476.2 (12.50 per w/c)






PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS: PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 440 translates into 1760 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 888 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months. FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, A sum of Rs. 362.53 million was allocated to the region under various heads, against which Rs. 323.98 million (89%) were utilized.


Establishment Charges 42,400,816 29,525,802 12,875,014 70% Purchase of Durable Goods 740,000 668,270 71,730 90% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 4,913,584 3,693,097 1,220,487 75% Civil Works (Total) 314,480,728 *290,101,971 24,378,757 92% Total 362,535,128 323,989,140 38,545,988 89%


Bricklining %age

80%20%



-50

50

150

250

350

450

550

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Veri

ficat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR





In the region, on average, Rs. 651,455 have been expended on each watercourse as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 734.


Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





464 438 59,197,000 314,480,728 290,101,971 285,336,873 91% 651,455 734








17%83%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



GUJRANWALA REGION


During the year under review, the performance is again up to the mark. The target was set to 1.2 times than last year, i.e. 407, yet the region registered completion / verification of 422 watercourses / schemes (104%) with the deployment of following staff.


:

3.94 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

4820 1766 3054 2415 277 341 618 1797





Target FY 2005-06: 333 74 407






Irrigated Area:









Barani Area:





Av. length of improved schemes: 0.31 km

This graph depicts the percentage lining of the watercourses improved & verified in the irrigated area of the region.


Bricklining %age

83%

17%



-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR



FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, A sum of Rs. 249.06 million was allocated to the region under various heads, against which Rs. 194.15 million (78%) were utilized.


Establishment Charges 33,326,291 22,968,458 10,357,833 69% Purchase of Durable Goods 1,330,500 1,329,881 619 100% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 6,264,265 3,398,582 2,865,683 54% Civil Works (Total Irrigated) 193,842,411 156,357,400 37,485,011 81% Civil Works (Total Barani) 14,305,486 10,105,217 4,200,269 71% Total 249,068,953 194,159,538 54,909,415 78%



An amount of Rs. 208.14 million was allocated for civil works in the region, against which an amount of Rs. 166.46 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 69% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses / schemes.

In the Irrigated area of the region, on an average, Rs. 392,144 have been expended on each watercourse as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 718.

In the Barani area of the region, on an average, Rs. 131,376 have been expended on each scheme as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 424.


Civil works started

Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





Irrigated 441 341 59,290,000 193,842,411 156,357,400 133,721,264 69% 392,144 718

Barani 93 81 3,407,000 14,305,486 10,105,217 10,641,482 74% 131,376 424

Total 534 422 62,697,000 208,147,897 166,462,617 144,362,746 69% - -


Recovery due for FY 2004-05 : 3,572,245Recovery due for FY 2005-06 : 2,196,192Total recoverable amount : 5,768,437Amount recovered : 2,780,383Amount yet to be recovered (Rs.) : 2,988,054


27%

73%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



LAHORE REGION

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this region overall achieved 98% of the targets by completing 310 watercourses against the assigned target of 317. During the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. The target was set to 1.5 times than last year, i.e. 465, yet the region registered completion / verification of 489 watercourses (105%) with the deployment of following staff.


:

2.6 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

6425 2489 3936 3328 310 489 799 2529


Target FY 2005-06: 465


FCRs submitted: 499















Establishment Charges 53,230,733 32,305,707 20,925,026 61% Purchase of Durable Goods 182,000 - 182,000 - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 5,965,401 4,462,244 1,503,157 75% Civil Works (Total) 331,455,702 *331,105,678 350,024 100% Total 390,833,836 367,873,629 22,960,207 94%


Bricklining %age

82%18%



-50

50

150

250

350

450

550

650

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR




An amount of Rs. 331.45 million was allocated for civil works in the region, against which an amount of Rs. 331.10 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 84.5% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses.



Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





587 489 93,361,000 331,455,702 331,105,678 280,124,593 84.5% 572,852 814








22%

78%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



MULTAN REGION


During the year under review, the performance is again up to the mark. The target was set to 2.2 times than last year, i.e. 845 watercourses, yet the region registered completion / verification of 858 watercourses (101.5%) with the deployment of following staff.


:

3.8 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

10405 3806 6599 4772 453 858 1311 3461


Target FY 2005-06: 845


FCRs submitted: 863















Establishment Charges 73,456,691 48,184,809 25,271,882 66% Purchase of Durable Goods 1,160,457 1,019,970 140,487 88% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 6,943,673 5,290,436 1,653,237 76% Civil Works (Total) 641,500,876 *534,691,749 106,809,127 83% Total 723,061,697 589,186,964 133,874,733 81%


Bricklining %age



-50

50

150

250

350

450

550

650

750

850

950

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





883 858 149,730,000 641,500,876 534,691,749 575,156,493 90% 670,345 664








22%


Share



SARGODHA REGION


During the year under review, the performance has advanced. The target was set to 1.7 times than last year, i.e. 405 watercourses, yet the region registered completion / verification of 420 watercourses (104%) with the deployment of following staff.


:

2.6 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

5696 2018 3678 2836 232 420 652 2184


Target FY 2005-06: 405


FCRs submitted: 432















Establishment Charges 37,589,940 28,650,038 8,939,902 76% Purchase of Durable Goods 110,672 109,947 725 99% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 3,436,875 2,351,780 1,085,095 68% Civil Works (Total) 225,113,842 *215,467,935 9,645,907 96% Total 266,251,329 246,579,700 19,671,629 93%


Bricklining %age

81%19%



-50

50

150

250

350

450

550

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





451 420 72,309,000 225,113,842 215,467,935 236,573,005 105% 563,269 737


Recovery due for FY 2004-05 : 843,570




Amount yet to be recovered (Rs.) : 297,648


25%

75%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



RAWALPINDI REGION

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this region overall achieved 114% of the targets by completing 142 schemes against the assigned target of 125. During the year under review, the performance is again up to the mark. The target was set to 2.2 times than last year, i.e. 276, yet the region registered completion / verification of 283 schemes (102.5%) with the deployment of following staff.


:

13.5 watercourses


Watercourses improved under NPIW

FY 2004-5 FY 2005-6 Total

135 283 425


Target FY 2005-06: 276


FCRs submitted: 283








Av. length of improved schemes: 0.48 km



PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS:

PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse / scheme in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 276 translates into 1104 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 562 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months. FINANCIAL PROFILE:

During financial year 2005-06, A sum of Rs. 47.94 million was allocated to the region under various heads, against which Rs. 43.21 million (90%) were utilized.


Establishment Charges - - - - Purchase of Durable Goods 423,448 373,437 50,011 88% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 3,604,500 2,616,792 987,708 73% Civil Works (Total) 43,912,306 *40,221,608 3,690,698 92% Total 47,940,254 43,211,837 4,728,417 90%





-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR



In the region, on average, Rs. 148,514 have been expended on each scheme as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 313.


Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





286 283 10,891,000 43,912,306 40,221,608 42,029,426 96% 148,514 313


Recovery due for FY 2004-05 : 596


Total recoverable amount : 40,278

Amount recovered : 40,278

Amount yet to be recovered (Rs.) : 0


27%

73%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



OFWM Regions: Allocation of Targets (Share Percentage)

Bahawalpur20.8%

D.G. Khan14.3%

Faisalabad10.1%Gujranwala

9.3%

Lahore10.6%

Multan19.3%

Sargodha9.3%

Rawalpindi6.3%

BahawalpurD.G. KhanFaisalabadGujranwalaLahoreMultanSargodhaRawalpindi

OFWM Regions: Achievements (Share Percentage)

Bahawalpur20.8%

D.G. Khan14.0%

Faisalabad9.8%Gujranwala

9.5%

Lahore11.0%

Multan19.2%

Sargodha9.4%

Rawalpindi6.3%

BahawalpurD.G. KhanFaisalabadGujranwalaLahoreMultanSargodhaRawalpindi



OFWM: Targets vs Achievements (Region wise)

627

440

407 46

5

845

405

276

930

625

438

422 48

9

858

420

283

910

0

200

400

600

800

Baha

wal

pur

D.G

. Kha

n

Fais

alab

ad

Guj

ranw

ala

Laho

re

Mul

tan

Sarg

odha

Raw

alpi

ndi

Wat

erco

urse

s

Target

Achievement

OFWM: Percentage Achievements (Region wise)

99.5 99.7 101.5 102.2 102.5 103.7 103.7 105.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Fais

alab

ad

D.G

. Kha

n

Mul

tan

Bah

awal

pur

Raw

alpi

ndi

Guj

ranw

ala

Sar

godh

a

Laho

re

Perc

enta

ge A

chie

vem

ent



OFWM: Bricklining / Lining per Watercourse (Region wise)

0.850.95

0.810.89

0.77

1.01

0.70

0.55

0.400.48

0.31

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

Irrig

ated

Are

as

Bah

awal

pur

D. G

. Kha

n

Fais

alab

ad

Sar

godh

a

Mul

tan

Laho

re

Guj

ranw

ala

Bar

ani

Are

as

Raw

alpi

ndi

Bar

ani

Guj

ranw

ala

Bar

ani

Bric

klin

ed /

Line

d Le

ngth

(Km

)

OFWM: Cost per Meter of Lining (Region wise)

743664

710 718 734 737 747814

335 313

414

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Irrig

ated

Are

as

Mul

tan

D.G

. Kha

n

Guj

ranw

ala

Fais

alab

ad

Sar

godh

a

Bah

awal

pur

Laho

re

Bar

ani A

reas

Raw

alpi

ndi

Gjw

Bar

ani

Cost

per

Met

er o

f Wat

erco

urse

(Rs.

)



BAHAWALNAGAR

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district achieved 106% of the targets by completing 109 watercourses against the assigned target of 103.

During the year under review, the performance is again up to the mark. Although the target was 3 times than last year i.e. 319 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 319 watercourses (100%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Gulzar Muhammad : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Maqbool Ahmad Gill : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 13 WMOs : 17 Supervisors : 94 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.4 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

4078 2138 1940 1688 109 319 428 1260


Target FY 2005-06: 319


FCRs submitted: 319







Nakkas installed (Nos.): 13082 (41 per w/c)





This graph depicts the percentage lining of the watercourses improved & verified in the district.

PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS: PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 319 translates into 1276 site visits for certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 651 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months. FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, an amount of Rs. 262.97 million was allocated to the district under various heads, against which Rs. 239.87 million (91%) were utilized .


Establishment Charges 21,401,000 16,941,751 4,459,249 79%

Purchase of Durable Goods - - - -

Repair, Maintenance, C & S 2,452,000 1,561,868 890,132 64%

Civil Works (Total) 239,119,237 *221,370,870 17,748,367 93%

Total 262,972,237 239,874,489 23,097,748 91%


Bricklining %age

72%

28% BrickliningEarthen works


-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR




A sum of Rs. 239.11 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 221.37 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the expenditure utilization comes to 102% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses, signifying some amount is yet to be paid to the WUAs.

In the district, on an average, Rs. 766,998 have been expended on each watercourse as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 751.

Government Funds (Rs.) Av. material cost (Rs.) Civil

works started

Verified w/cs

Farmers' share Deposited (Rs.) Allocated Transferred

to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



327 319 63,762,000 239,119,237 221,370,870 244,672,363 102% 766,998 751






Amount yet to be recovered (Rs.) : -


22%

78%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



BAHAWALPUR


During the year under review, the performance has been much better than last year. Even though the target was 3.4 times the previous year, i.e. 272 watercourses, yet the district registered completion/verification of 278 watercourses (102%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Ali Ahmad Mehais : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad Gill : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 12 WMOs : 15 Supervisors : 99 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.8 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

3844 1739 2105 1944 79 278 357 1587


Target FY 2005-06: 272


FCRs submitted: 282













PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS: PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 272 translates into 1088 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 651 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months. FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, an amount of Rs. 233.37 million was allocated to the district under various heads, against which Rs. 192.43 million (82%) were utilized .


Establishment Charges 26,377,573 18,148,122 8,229,451 69%

Purchase of Durable Goods 300 - 300 -

Repair, Maintenance, C & S 3,042,271 1,420,767 1,621,504 47%

Civil Works (Total) 203,952,959 *172,864,110 31,088,849 85%

Total 233,373,103 192,432,999 40,939,804 82%


Bricklining %age

73%

27%BrickliningEarthen works


-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR




A sum of Rs. 203.95 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 172.86 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the expenditure utilization comes to 97% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses.

In the district on an average, Rs. 605,967 have been expended on each watercourse as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 775.


Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





272 278 44,123,000 203,952,959 172,864,110 168,458,938 97% 605,967 775








20%80%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



RAHIM YAR KHAN


During the year under review, the performance is again up to the mark. The target was set to 3.5 times than last year, i.e. 319 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 333 watercourses (104%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Zafar Yab Shah : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Saif-ur-Rehman : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 14 WMOs : 21 Supervisors : 94 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.5 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

5367 1846 3521 3111 94 333 427 2684


Target FY 2005-06: 319


FCRs submitted: 339













PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS: PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 319 translates into 1276 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 820 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months. FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, A sum of Rs. 297.43 million was allocated to the district under various heads, against which Rs. 260.17 million (87%) were utilized.


Establishment Charges 39,486,785 23,391,872 8,229,451 59% Purchase of Durable Goods 2040 - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 3,780,147 2,204,763 1,621,504 58% Civil Works (Total) 254,165,934 *234,578,380 31,088,849 92% Total 297,434,906 260,175,015 37,259,891 87%


Bricklining %age

75%25%



-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR




An amount of Rs. 254.16 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 234.57 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 98% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses.



Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





363 333 86,483,000 254,165,934 234,578,380 248,527,437 98% 746,328 728

Status of Recovery from WUAs







27%

73%Farmers'

Share

Govt'sShare



DERA GHAZI KHAN

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district had achieved 100% targets by completing 55 watercourses against the assigned target of 55.

During the year under review, the district has performed well. Even though the target was 3.6 times the last year, i.e. 200 watercourses, yet the district registered completion/verification of 198 watercourses (99%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Zafarullah Sindhu : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Zafarullah Sindhu : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 5 WMOs : 19 Supervisors : 75 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.6 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

2840 753 2087 1861 55 198 253 1608


Target FY 2005-06: 200


FCRs submitted: 201













PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS: PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 200 translates into 800 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 460 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months. FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, an amount of Rs. 176.48 million was allocated to the district under various heads, against which Rs. 154.88 million (88%) was utilized.


Establishment Charges 23,722,217 14,439,419 9,282,798 61% Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 2616635 2,891,429 (274,794) 111% Civil Works (Total) 150,148,775 *137,556,832 137,556,832 92% Total 176,487,627 154,887,680 21,599,947 88%


Bricklining %age

74%26%



-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR




A sum of Rs. 150.14 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 137.55 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 76% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses.



Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



217 198 30,478,000 150,148,775 137,556,832 113,616,760 76% 573,822 967








18%82%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



LAYYAH

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district accomplished 100% of the targets by completing 32 watercourses against the assigned target of 32.

During the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. The target was smaller than last year, i.e. 22 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 22 watercourses (100%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Abdul Majeed : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Sadiq Raza Cheema : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 3 WMOs : 2 Supervisors : 4 Watercourses per supervisor

:

5.5 watercourses



improved


Access W/Cs

Improved

1121 1028 93 51 32 22 54 3


Target FY 2005-06: 22


FCRs submitted: 22













PHYSICAL VERIFICATIONS: PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 22 translates into 88 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 37 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months. FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, an amount of Rs. 20.32 million was allocated to the district under various heads, against which Rs. 19.86 million (98%) were utilized.


Establishment Charges - - - 0% Purchase of Durable Goods - - - 0% Repair, Maintenance, C & S - - - 0% Civil Works (Total) 20,326,382 *19,866,942 459,440 98% Total 20,326,382 19,866,942 459,440 98%


Bricklining %age

73%



-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



25 22 4,624,000 20,326,382 19,866,942 18,970,631 93% 862,301 735








19%81%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



MUZAFFARGARH


During the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. Although the target was 3 times than last year i.e. 270 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 270 watercourses (100%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Zafar Ahmad Nasir : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Rahim Bakhsh Khan : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 17 WMOs : 20 Supervisors : 104 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.6 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

4447 2390 2057 1929 90 270 360 1569


Target FY 2005-06: 270


FCRs submitted: 270















Establishment Charges 24,996,162 19,317,815 5,678,347 77% Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 2055416 1,689,043 366,373 82% Civil Works (Total) 216,483,926 *212,908,225 3,575,701 98% Total 243,535,504 233,915,083 9,620,421 96%


Bricklining %age

74%26%



-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR




A sum of Rs. 216.48 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 212.90 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 104% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses, signifying that some amount is yet to be paid to WUAs.



Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



278 270 38,048,000 216,483,926 212,908,225 225,170,942 104% 833,966 835








15%85%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



RAJANPUR


During the year under review, the performance is again satisfactory. The target was 2.5 times than last year i.e. 135 watercourses, yet the district registered completion/verification of 135 watercourses (100%). Following team in the district accomplished the task

Mr. Noor Ahmad Khan : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Munir Ahmed Khan : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 10 WMOs : 11 Supervisors : 39 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.5 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

2357 939 1418 1113 53 135 188 925


Target FY 2005-06: 135


FCRs submitted: 135














FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, an amount of Rs. 107.34 million was allocated to the district under various heads, against which Rs. 92.70 million (86%) were utilized.




Bricklining %age



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





155 135 24,300,000 90,111,913 81,332,881 75,999,804 84% 562,961 830








23%

77%Farmers'

Share

Govt'sShare



FAISLABAD During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district had achieved only 90% of the targets by completing 161 watercourses against the assigned target of 179.

However during the year under review, the performance has advanced. Chasing the target of 120 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 129 watercourses (107%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. M. Ashraf : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Muhammad Aleem Rao : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 9 WMOs : 9 Supervisors : 35 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.7 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

2741 1733 1008 733 161 129 290 443


Target FY 2005-06: 120


FCRs submitted: 130
















Establishment Charges 14,424,216 10,279,675 4,144,541 71% Purchase of Durable Goods 700000 629000 71,000 90% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1842884 1,484,071 358,813 81% Civil Works (Total) 99,394,225 *95,524,864 3,869,361 96% Total 116,361,325 107,917,610 8,443,715 93%


Bricklining %age

75%25%



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR




A sum of Rs. 99.39 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 95.52 million was transferred to WUAs. A bit higher amount was verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses than the budgetary allocation which is to be paid to WUAs.



Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





130 129 20,889,000 99,394,225 95,524,864 99,745,873 100% 773,223 721








18%82%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



JHANG


During the year under review, the performance has been satisfactory again. The target was almost 3.6 times than last year i.e. 230 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 213 watercourses (93%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Nazeer Hussain Javed : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Sabtain Farooq Cheema : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 12 WMOs : 10 Supervisors : 79 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.7 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

2377 904 1473 1405 65 213 278 1127


Target FY 2005-06: 230


FCRs submitted: 230


















Bricklining %age

83%

17%



-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



234 213 24,826,000 142,591,225 127,957,997 114,116,937 80% 669,442 954








16%84%Farmers'

Share

Govt'sShare



TOBA TEK SINGH

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district was able to achieve 93% of the targets by completing 112 watercourses against the assigned target of 120. However during the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. Chasing the target of 90 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 96 watercourses (107%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Shafiq Ahmad : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Muhammad Rafiq Amjad : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 6 WMOs : 5 Supervisors : 28 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.4 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1361 856 505 371 112 96 208 163


Target FY 2005-06: 90


FCRs submitted: 98
















Establishment Charges 8,376,842 5,031,240 3,345,602 60% Purchase of Durable Goods 40000 39270 730 98% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1086458 812,625 273,833 75% Civil Works (Total) 72,495,278 *66,619,110 5,876,168 92% Total 81,998,578 72,502,245 9,496,333 88%


Bricklining %age



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Veri

ficat

ions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





100 96 13,482,000 72,495,278 66,619,110 71,474,063 98% 744,521 703








17%83%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



GUJRANWALA During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district attained only 88% of the targets by completing 79 watercourses against the assigned target of 90.

However during the year under review, the performance has advanced. Chasing the target of 95 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 109 watercourses (115%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Shah Muhammad Alvi : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Muhammad Zikriya Shah : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 9 WMOs : 7 Supervisors : 40 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.7 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1868 698 1170 842 79 109 188 654


Target FY 2005-06: 95


FCRs submitted: 129
















Establishment Charges 12,323,264 7,728,856 4,594,408 63% Purchase of Durable Goods 800000 800000 - 100% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1102416 759,809 342,607 69% Civil Works (Total) 47,630,761 *41,570,358 6,060,403 87% Total 61,856,441 50,859,023 10,997,418 82%


Bricklining %age

86%

14%Bricklining

Earthen works


-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



141 109 13,681,000 47,630,761 41,570,358 34,389,273 72% 315,497 744








25%


Share



GUJRAT

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district achieved 94% of the targets by completing 60 watercourses / schemes against the assigned target of 64.

However during the year under review, the performance is good. Chasing the target of 31, the district registered completion / verification of 37 watercourses / schemes (119%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Shahid Awan : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Safader Ali Cheema : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 2 WMOs : 0 Supervisors : 3 Watercourses per supervisor

:

12.3 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

248 125 123 55 23 16 39 16





Target FY 2005-06: 15 16 31






Irrigated Area:









Barani Area:





Av. length of improved schemes: 0.36 km This graph depicts the percentage lining of the watercourses improved & verified in the irrigated area of district.


Bricklining %age

84%

16%Bricklining

Earthen works


-505

101520253035404550

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Veri

ficat

ions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR





Establishment Charges - - - - Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 2,622,311 790,881 1,831,430 30% Civil Works (Total Irrigated) 7,540,381 *7,758,326 (217,945) 103% Civil Works (Total Barani) 4,773,402 *2,903,958 1,869,444 61% Total 14,936,094 11,453,165 3,482,929 77%



A sum of Rs. 12.31 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 10.66 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 86% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses / schemes.

In the Irrigated area of the district, on an average, Rs. 211,594 have been expended on each watercourse as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 738.

In the Barani area of the district, on an average, Rs. 130,473 have been expended on each scheme as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 367.


Civil works started

Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





Irrigated 19 16 4,213,000 7,540,381 7,758,326 7,828,990 104% 211,594 738

Barani 24 21 714,000 4,773,402 2,903,958 2,739,941 57% 130,473 367

Total 43 37 4,927,000 12,313,783 10,662,284 10,568,931 86% - -


Recovery due for FY 2004-05 : 136,562 Recovery due for FY 2005-06 : 48,844


Amount recovered : 54,325 Amount yet to be recovered (Rs.) : 131,081


32%

68%

Farmers'ShareGovt's

Share



HAFIZABAD

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district managed to achieve 92% of the targets by completing 35 watercourses against the assigned target of 38.

Now during the year under review, the operations remained successful. Chasing the target of 60 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 61 watercourses (102%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Tanveer Ahmad : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Gulzar Muhammad : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 5 WMOs : 3 Supervisors : 17 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.6 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

840 338 502 443 35 61 96 347


Target FY 2005-06: 60


FCRs submitted: 64


















Bricklining %age

86%

14%Bricklining

Earthen works


-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Veri

ficat

ions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





79 61 9,942,000 36,998,197 25,560,715 21,983,966 59% 360,392 758








28%

72%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



MANDI BAHA-UD-DIN


However during the year under review, the performance is not as good. Chasing the target of 113 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 95 watercourses (84%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Rasheed Ahmad Gondal : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Akhtar Ali Kamboh : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 6 WMOs : 6 Supervisors : 46 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.0 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1218 457 761 700 80 95 175 525


Target FY 2005-06: 113


FCRs submitted: 116
















Establishment Charges 9,450,584 7,775,353 1,675,231 82% Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 25050 363,474 (338,424) 1451% Civil Works (Total) 63,478,547 *63,254,943 223,604 100% Total 72,954,181 71,393,770 1,560,411 98%


Bricklining %age

75%25%



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR




A sum of Rs. 63.47 million was allocated for civil works in the district, which was completely transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 87% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses.



Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





130 95 24,578,000 63,478,547 63,254,943 55,080,546 87% 579,795 695








28%


Share



NAROWAL

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district achieved only 84% of the targets by completing 41 watercourses/schemes against the assigned target of 49.

Providentially during the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. Chasing the target of 41, the district registered completion / verification of 42 watercourses / schemes (102%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Hazoor Ahmad Hazoor : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Muhammad Nasir Shah : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 2 WMOs : 2 Supervisors : 4 Watercourses per supervisor

:

10.5 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

172 29 143 83 23 18 41 42





Target FY 2005-06: 18 23 41






Irrigated Area:









Barani Area:





Av. length of improved schemes: 0.29 km This graph depicts the percentage lining of the watercourses improved & verified in the irrigated area of district.


Bricklining %age

86%

14%Bricklining

Earthen works


-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR





Establishment Charges - - - - Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 750,994 510,000 240,994 68% Civil Works (Total Irrigated) 14,912,437 7,023,116 7,889,321 47% Civil Works (Total Barani) 3,967,675 3,230,603 737,072 81% Total 19,631,106 10,763,719 8,867,387 55%



A sum of Rs. 18.88 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 10.25 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization remained 43% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses / schemes.




Civil works started

Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





Irrigated 25 18 3,260,000 14,912,437 7,023,116 4,902,185 33% 272,346 710

Barani 33 24 1,016,000 3,967,675 3,230,603 3,245,977 82% 135,249 464

Total 58 42 4,276,000 18,880,112 10,253,719 8,148,162 43% - -






29%

71%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



SIALKOT

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district achieved 108% of the targets by completing 68 watercourses / schemes against the assigned target of 63. During the year under review, the performance is again exceptional. Chasing the target of 67, the district registered completion / verification of 78 watercourses / schemes (116%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Ehsanullah Ahmad : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Muhammad Asghar : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 3 WMOs : 4 Supervisors : 13 Watercourses per supervisor

:

6.0 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

474 119 355 292 37 42 79 213





Target FY 2005-06: 32 35 67






Irrigated Area:









Barani Area:





Av. length of improved schemes: 0.29 km This graph depicts the percentage lining of the watercourses improved & verified in the Irrigated area of district.


Bricklining %age

86%

14%Bricklining

Earthen works


-100

10203040

506070

8090

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR





Establishment Charges 4,295,225 2,841,999 1,453,226 66% Purchase of Durable Goods 305,00 29,941 559 98% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1,061,480 734,011 327,469 69% Civil Works (Total Irrigated) 23,282,088 *11,189,942 12,092,146 48% Civil Works (Total Barani) 5,564,409 *3,970,656 1,593,753 71% Total 34,233,702 18,766,549 15,467,153 55%



A sum of Rs. 28.84 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 15.16 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization remained 49% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses / schemes.




Civil works started

Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





Irrigated 47 42 3,616,000 23,282,088 11,189,942 9,536,304 41% 227,055 667

Barani 36 36 1,677,000 5,564,409 3,970,656 4,655,564 84% 129,321 439

Total 83 78 5,293,000 28,846,497 15,160,598 14,191,868 49% - -






26%

74%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



KASUR


However during the year under review, the performance has matched again. Chasing the target of 95 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 94 watercourses (99%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Ch. Muhammad Ashraf : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Manzoor Ahmad : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 9 WMOs : 6 Supervisors : 48 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.0 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1628 500 1128 874 98 94 192 682


Target FY 2005-06: 95


FCRs submitted: 100
















Establishment Charges 14,858,164 10,161,917 4,696,247 68% Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1741836 1,578,664 163,172 91% Civil Works (Total) 75,942,905 *80,218,431 (4,275,526) 106% Total 92,542,905 91,959,012 583,893 99%


Bricklining %age

78% 22%



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





110 94 30,883,000 75,942,905 80,218,431 61,471,807 81% 653,955 941








28%

72%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



LAHORE


During the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. Chasing the target of 35 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 48 watercourses (137%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Mumtaz Ahmad Awan : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Malik Muhammad Akram : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 2 WMOs : 6 Supervisors : 16 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.0 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

644 144 500 378 52 48 100 278


Target FY 2005-06: 35


FCRs submitted: 48
















Establishment Charges 6,524,591 4,483,329 2,041,262 69% Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 695409 572,576 122,833 82% Civil Works (Total) 26,396,556 *24,667,075 1,729,481 93% Total 33,616,556 29,722,980 3,893,576 88%


Bricklining %age

73%



-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Veri

ficat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





51 48 8,810,000 26,396,556 24,667,075 23,123,226 88% 481,734 838








26%


Share



NANKANA SAHIB

After becoming a separate district from District Sheikhupura, upon the basis of survey data received, the watercourse statistics were updated. During the FY 2005-06, chasing the target of 100 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 102 watercourses (102%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Abdul Ghafoor : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Mansha Ali : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 8 WMOs : 5 Supervisors : 34 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.0 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1014 550 464 464 45 102 147 317


Target FY 2005-06: 100


FCRs submitted: 102














FINANCIAL PROFILE: During financial year 2005-06, an amount of Rs. 61.74 million was allocated to the district under various heads, against which Rs. 61.84 million were utilized.


Establishment Charges 5,038,264 4,990,538 47,726 99% Purchase of Durable Goods 182000 - 182,000 - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1046870 877,378 169,492 84% Civil Works (Total) 55,480,000 *55,977,582 (497,582) 101% Total 61,747,134 61,845,498 (98,364) 100%


Bricklining %age

85%

15%

Bricklining

Earthen works


-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Veri

ficat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR




A sum of Rs. 55.48 million was allocated for civil works in the district, but a little higher amount (101%) was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 88% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses.

In the district on an average, Rs. 479,805 have been expended on each watercourse as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 826.


Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



126 102 18,188,000 55,480,000 55,977,582 48,940,199 88% 479,805 826








25%

75%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



OKARA

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district achieved 94% of the targets by completing 77 watercourses against the assigned target of 82. However during the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. Chasing the target of 150 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 152 watercourses (101%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Gulzar Muhammad : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Rashid Hamid Zafar : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 10 WMOs : 9 Supervisors : 59 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.6 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1903 513 1390 1158 77 152 229 929


Target FY 2005-06: 150


FCRs submitted: 154















Establishment Charges 17,797,932 12,119,788 5,678,144 68% Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1590068 1,225,277 364,791 77% Civil Works (Total) 120,084,943 *119,281,460 803,483 99% Total 139,472,943 132,626,525 6,846,418 95%


Bricklining %age

81%19%



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





180 152 23,160,000 120,084,943 119,281,460 100,770,026 84% 662,960 738








16%84%Farmers'

Share

Govt'sShare



SHEIKHUPURA

After the break up of the district into District Sheikhupura & District Nankana Sahib, upon the basis of survey data received, the watercourse statistics were updated. During the FY 2005-06, chasing the target of 85 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 93 watercourses (109%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Abdul Razzaq : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Allah Ditta Mansoor : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 5 WMOs : 4 Supervisors : 32 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.9 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1236 782 454 454 38 93 131 323


Target FY 2005-06: 85


FCRs submitted: 95
















Establishment Charges 9,011,782 550,135 8,461,647 6% Purchase of Durable Goods - - - - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 891218 208,349 682,869 23% Civil Works (Total) 53,551,298 *50,961,130 2,590,168 95% Total 63,454,298 51,719,614 11,734,684 82%


Bricklining %age

86%

14%

Bricklining

Earthen works


-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





120 93 12,320,000 53,551,298 50,961,130 45,819,335 86% 492,681 818








19%81%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



KHANEWAL


Again during the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. Even though target was 2.8 times than last year i.e. 173 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 174 watercourses (101%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. M. Saleem Nahang : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Abdul Ghani : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 8 WMOs : 11 Supervisors : 43 Watercourses per supervisor

:

4.0 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

2017 759 1258 809 73 174 247 562


Target FY 2005-06: 173


FCRs submitted: 174


















Bricklining %age

80%20%



-200

20406080

100120140160180200

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





176 174 25,540,000 125,782,474 99,407,397 104,182,598 83% 598,750 708








20%80%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



LODHRAN


During the year under review, again the performance is good. Although the target was 3.8 times than last year i.e. 140 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 142 watercourses (101%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Habib-ur-Rehman : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Muhammad Ramzan : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 5 WMOs : 5 Supervisors : 37 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.8 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1542 411 1131 755 60 142 202 553


Target FY 2005-06: 140


FCRs submitted: 144
















Establishment Charges 11,080,738 7,567,389 3,513,349 68% Purchase of Durable Goods 238 - 238 - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1087878 710,597 377,281 65% Civil Works (Total) 111,964,267 *90,223,261 21,741,006 81% Total 124,133,121 98,501,247 25,631,874 79%


Bricklining %age

74%26%



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Veri

ficat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



148 142 25,130,000 111,964,267 9,022,3261 102,421,793 91% 721,280 635








22%

78%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



MULTAN


During the year under review, the performance has been admirable. Although the target was 2.8 times than last year i.e. 158 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 158 watercourses (100%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Rana Farman Ali Khan : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Rais Ahmed Rais : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 8 WMOs : 9 Supervisors : 44 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.6 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

2233 565 1668 1301 82 158 240 1061


Target FY 2005-06: 158


FCRs submitted: 158
















Establishment Charges 17,663,277 10,214,230 7,449,047 58% Purchase of Durable Goods 140185 - 140,185 - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1643342 1,065,928 577,414 65% Civil Works (Total) 110,646,872 *100,555,192 10,091,680 91% Total 130,093,676 111,835,350 18,258,326 86%


E


-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





159 158 25,080,000 110,646,872 100,555,192 105,769,636 96% 669,428 710








20%80%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



PAKPATTAN

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district had achieved 100% of the targets by completing 22 watercourses against the assigned target of 22.

During the year under review, the performance has been exceptional. Even though the target was 7.3 times than last year i.e. 160 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 160 watercourses (100%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Zafar Iqbal Mirza : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Javeed Iqbal : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 5 WMOs : 7 Supervisors : 44 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.6 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1192 315 877 800 22 160 182 618


Target FY 2005-06: 160


FCRs submitted: 162
















Establishment Charges 11,628,000 7,971,072 3,656,928 69% Purchase of Durable Goods 34 - 34 - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 748500 671,557 76,943 90% Civil Works (Total) 127,959,101 *96,266,624 31,692,477 75% Total 140,335,635 104,909,253 35,426,382 75%


Bricklining %age

77% 23%



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





165 160 33,030,000 127,959,101 96,266,624 109,123,082 85% 682,020 660


Recovery due for FY 2004-05 : -






26%

74% Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



SAHIWAL


During the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. Chasing the target of 94 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 94 watercourses (100%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Liaqat Ali : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Ahmed Ali Khitchi : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 4 WMOs : 3 Supervisors : 26 Watercourses per supervisor

:

3.6 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1568 749 819 416 124 94 218 198


Target FY 2005-06: 94


FCRs submitted: 95


















Bricklining %age

77% 23%



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



97 94 16,650,000 75,187,960 61,821,469 63,724,935 85% 677,925 630








21%79%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



VEHARI


During the year under review, the performance has improved more. Chasing the target of 120 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 130 watercourses (108%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Qamar Muhayyudin : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Mehar Allah Ditta : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 5 WMOs : 4 Supervisors : 32 Watercourses per supervisor

:

4.1 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1853 1007 846 691 92 130 222 469


Target FY 2005-06: 120


FCRs submitted: 130
















Establishment Charges 13,097,488 7,527,619 5,569,869 57% Purchase of Durable Goods 220000 220000 - 100% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1256512 996,464 260,048 79% Civil Works (Total) 89,960,202 *86,417,806 3,542,396 96% Total 104,534,202 95,161,889 9,372,313 91%


Bricklining %age

76%24%



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR




A sum of Rs. 89.96 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 86.41 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 99.9% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses.



Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





138 130 24,300,000 89,960,202 86,417,806 89,934,449 99.9% 691,803 631








22%78%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



BHAKKAR

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district managed to achieve 96% of the targets by completing 56 watercourses against the assigned target of 58.

During the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. Although the target was 2 times than last year i.e. 120 watercourses, yet the district registered completion / verification of 122 watercourses (102%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Dr. Abdul Rauf : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Ch. Muhammad Rafiq : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 7 WMOs : 9 Supervisors : 44 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.8 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1238 328 910 679 56 122 178 501


Target FY 2005-06: 120


FCRs submitted: 122


















Bricklining %age

86%

14%

Bricklining

Earthen works


-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





127 122 18,873,000 56,997,864 55,237,126 58,488,325 103% 479,412 713








25%

75% Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



KHUSHAB

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district achieved 100% of the targets by completing 35 watercourses against the assigned target of 35. During the year under review, the performance has enhanced and is up to the mark. Chasing the target of 50 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 52 watercourses (104%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Malik Waqar : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Malik Sher Muhammad : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 2 WMOs : 3 Supervisors : 22 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.4 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

788 362 426 279 35 52 87 192


Target FY 2005-06: 50


FCRs submitted: 52
















Establishment Charges 4,249,756 2,757,870 1,491,886 65% Purchase of Durable Goods 200 - 200 - Repair, Maintenance, C & S 437375 290,642 146,733 66% Civil Works (Total) 23,718,819 *23,211,762 507,057 98% Total 28,406,150 26,260,274 2,145,876 92%


Bricklining %age

81%19%



-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Veri

ficat

ions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR







Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



54 52 8,304,000 23,718,819 23,211,762 25,371,493 107% 487,913 716








26%

74% Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



MIANWALI


During the year under review, the performance is again up to the mark. Chasing the target of 90 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 91 watercourses (101%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Faiz Ahmad Kundi : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Zaffar Iqbal Hussain Shah : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 9 WMOs : 7 Supervisors : 36 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.5 watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

1081 216 865 678 50 91 141 537


Target FY 2005-06: 90


FCRs submitted: 98


















Bricklining %age

83%

17%



-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR







Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





104 91 16,112,000 42,950,901 35,598,166 41,218,355 96% 452,948 765








31%

69% Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



SARGODHA

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district achieved 95% of the targets by completing 91 watercourses against the assigned target of 96. However during the year under review, the performance has enhanced. Chasing the target of 145 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 155 watercourses (107%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Abdul Majeed : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Afzal Bajwa : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 13 WMOs : 10 Supervisors : 59 Watercourses per supervisor

:

2.6 Watercourses



improved


Remaining W/Cs

2589 1112 1477 1200 91 155 246 954


Target FY 2005-06: 145


FCRs submitted: 160
















Establishment Charges 14,599,200 10,788,294 3,810,906 74% Purchase of Durable Goods 110472 109947 525 100% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1314500 827,870 486,630 63% Civil Works (Total) 101,446,258 *101,420,881 25,377 100% Total 117,470,430 113,146,992 4,323,438 96%


Bricklining %age

76%24%



-50

0

50

100

150

200

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR




A sum of Rs. 101.44 million was allocated for civil works in the district, which was almost completely transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 110% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses, demonstrating that some amount is yet to be padi to WUAs.



Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



166 155 29,020,000 101,446,258 101,420,881 111,494,832 110% 719,321 743








22%

78%Farmers'

ShareGovt'sShare



ATTOCK

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district achieved 100% of the targets by completing 40 watercourses / schemes against the assigned target of 40.

During the year under review, the performance is up to the mark. Chasing the target of 68, the district registered completion / verification of 68 watercourses / schemes (100%) with the deployment of following staff.

Dr. Muhammad Anwar : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Muhammad Ishfaq : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 5 WMOs : 2 Supervisors : 7 Watercourses per supervisor

:

9.7 watercourses



FY 2004-5 FY 2005-6 Total

40 68 108


Target FY 2005-06: 68


FCRs submitted: 68













During financial year 2005-06, an amount of Rs. 12.00 million was allocated to the district under various heads, against which Rs. 11.26 million (94%) were utilized.


Establishment Charges - - - - Purchase of Durable Goods 123122 121030 2,092 98% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 1074218 798,839 275,379 74% Civil Works (Total) 10,805,954 *10,347,896 458,058 96% Total 12,003,294 11,267,765 735,529 94%



A sum of Rs. 10.80 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 10.34 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 96% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses / schemes.


-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-IIFCR



In the district, on an average, Rs. 152,084 have been expended on each watercourse / scheme as the government’s share. The average cost per meter of construction comes to Rs. 324.


Verified w/cs


to WUAs Utilized on

verified w/cs



68 68 2,740,000 10,805,954 10,347,896 10,341,695 96% 152,084 324








21%79%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



CHAKWAL

During the last year, i.e. FY 2004-05, this district accomplished 105% of the targets by completing 21 watercourses / schemes against the assigned target of 20.

During the year under review, the performance is again up to the mark. Although the target was 3.5 times than last year i.e. 70, yet the district registered completion / verification of 70 watercourses/schemes (100%) with the deployment of following staff.

Mr. Iftikhar Qureshi : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Bashir Ahmed Sara : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 2 WMOs : 1 Supervisors : 5 Watercourses per supervisor

:

14 watercourses



FY 2004-5 FY 2005-6 Total

21 70 91


Target FY 2005-06: 70


FCRs submitted: 70















Establishment Charges - - - - Purchase of Durable Goods 87021 68912 18,109 79% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 696351 489,251 207,100 70% Civil Works (Total) 10,993,534 *7,995,776 2,997,758 73% Total 11,776,906 8,553,939 3,222,967 73%



A sum of Rs. 10.99 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 7.99 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 89% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses/schemes.


-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Ver

ifica

tions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR





Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





70 70 2,696,000 10,993,534 7,995,776 9,739,377 89% 139,134 256




Total recoverable amount : 256

Amount recovered : 256



25%

75% Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



JHELUM


During the year under review, the performance is again outstanding. Chasing the target of 70 watercourses, the district registered completion / verification of 74 watercourses/schemes (106%) with the deployment of following staff.

Dr. Khalid Khan : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Muhammad Azam Virk : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 3 WMOs : 2 Supervisors : 3 Watercourses per supervisor

:

24.6 watercourses



FY 2004-5 FY 2005-6 Total

56 74 130


Target FY 2005-06: 70


FCRs submitted: 74












PWMC has to conduct four mandatory visits to each under improvement watercourse / scheme in order to certify the works executed at site. A target of 70 translates into 280 site visits certifying S&D, ICR-I, ICR-II & FCR. Following graph portrays that 137 certifications were made after March, 2006 i.e. during last quarter & onwards. The chart given below depicts activity level during various months.

FINANCIAL PROFILE:



Establishment Charges - - - - Purchase of Durable Goods 123000 115430 7,570 94% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 980000 794,336 185,664 81% Civil Works (Total) 11,215,111 *11,087,706 127,405 99% Total 12,318,111 11,997,472 320,639 97%



A sum of Rs. 11.21 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 11.08 million was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to a 99% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses/schemes.


-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR





Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





74 74 2,560,000 11,215,111 11,087,706 11,094,124 99% 149,920 354








19%81%

Farmers'Share

Govt'sShare



RAWALPINDI


During the year under review, the performance is again good. Chasing the target of 68, the district registered completion / verification of 71 watercourses/ schemes (104%) with the deployment of following staff.

Dr. Abdullah Shah : EDO (Agriculture) Mr. Bashir Ahmad : DO (OFWM) AAEs/DDOs : 4 WMOs : 2 Supervisors : 6 Watercourses per supervisor

:

11.8 watercourses



FY 2004-5 FY 2005-6 Total

25 71 96


Target FY 2005-06: 68


FCRs submitted: 71















Establishment Charges - - - - Purchase of Durable Goods 90,305 68,065 22,240 75% Repair, Maintenance, C & S 853,931 534,366 319,565 63% Civil Works (Total) 10,897,707 *10,790,230 107,477 99% Total 11,841,943 11,392,661 449,282 96%



A sum of Rs. 10.89 million was allocated for civil works in the district, against which an amount of Rs. 10.79 was transferred to WUAs. However, the exependiture utilization comes to 99.6% (of budgetary allocation) as verified by PWMC on the verified watercourses/schemes.


-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

01-1

2-05

02-0

1-06

01-0

2-06

01-0

3-06

04-0

4-06

29-0

4-06

01-0

6-06

01-0

7-06

02-0

8-06

30-0

8-06

Period

Verif

icat

ions

ICR-I ICR-II

FCR





Verified w/cs

Farmers' share





74 71 2,895,000 10,897,707 10,790,230 10,854,230 99.6% 152,876 329




Total recoverable amount : -

Amount recovered : -



21%


Share



OFWM: Target vs Achievement (District Wise)

319

278

333

198

22

270

135

129

213

96

109

37

61

95

42

78

94

48

102

152

93

174

142

158

160

94

130

122

52

91

155

71

70

74

68

319

272

319

200

22

270

135

120

230

90

95

31

60

113

41

67

95

35

100

150

85

173

140

158

160

94

120

120

50

90

145

68

70

70

68

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Bahawalnagar

Bahawalpur

R. Y Khan

D.G. Khan

Layyah

Muzaffargarh

Rajanpur

Faisalabad

Jhang

T.T. Singh

Gujranwala

Gujrat

Hafizabad

M.B.Din

Narowal

Sialkot

Kasur

Lahore

Nankana Sahib

Okara

Sheikhupura

Khanewal

Lodhran

Multan

Pakpattan

Sahiwal

Vehari

Bhakkar

Khushab

Mianwali

Sargodha

Rawalpindi

Chakwal

Jhelum

Attock

Dis

trict

s

Watercourses

Target

Achievement



OFWM: Percentage Achievement (District Wise)

137.1

119.4

116.4

114.7

109.4

108.3

107.5

106.9

106.7

105.7

104.4

104.4

104.0

102.4

102.2

102.0

101.7

101.7

101.4

101.3

101.1

100.6

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

99.0

98.9

92.6

84.1

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Lahore

Gujrat

Sialkot

Gujranwala

Sheikhupura

Vehari

Faisalabad

Sargodha

T.T. Singh

Jhelum

Rawalpindi

R. Y Khan

Khushab

Narowal

Bahawalpur

Nankana Sahib

Bhakkar

Hafizabad

Lodhran

Okara

Mianwali

Khanewal

Attock

Bahawalnagar

Chakwal

Layyah

Multan

Muzaffargarh

Pakpattan

Rajanpur

Sahiwal

D.G. Khan

Kasur

Jhang

M.B.DinD

istri

cts

Percentage Achievement



OFWM: Watercourses per Supervisor (District Wise)

24.7

14.0

12.3

11.8

10.5

9.7

6.0

5.5

4.1

4.0

3.8

3.7

3.6

3.6

3.6

3.6

3.5

3.5

3.4

3.4

3.0

3.0

2.9

2.8

2.8

2.7

2.7

2.6

2.6

2.6

2.6

2.5

2.4

2.1

2.0

0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5

Jhelum

Chakwal

Gujrat

Rawalpindi

Narowal

Attock

Sialkot

Layyah

Vehari

Khanewal

Lodhran

Faisalabad

Pakpattan

Sahiwal

Multan

Hafizabad

R. Y Khan

Rajanpur

T.T. Singh

Bahawalnagar

Lahore

Nankana Sahib

Sheikhupura

Bahawalpur

Bhakkar

Gujranwala

Jhang

D.G. Khan

Sargodha

Muzaffargarh

Okara

Mianwali

Khushab

M.B.Din

Kasur

Dis

trict

s

Watercourses per Supervisors

On an average, there were 3.3 watercourses per supervisors in the OFWM.

Barani Areas or Irrigated+Barani Areas



OFWM: Watercourses per Supervisor & % Achievement (District Wise)

137.1

119.4

116.4

114.7

109.4

108.3

107.5

106.9

106.7

105.7

104.4

104.4

104

102.4

102.2

102

101.7

101.7

101.4

101.3

101.1

100.6

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

99

98.9

92.6

84.1

3.0

12.3

6.0

2.7

2.9

4.1

3.7

2.6

3.4

24.7

11.8

3.5

2.4

10.5

2.8

3.0

2.8

3.6

3.8

2.6

2.5

4.0

9.7

3.4

14.0

5.5

3.6

2.6

3.6

3.5

3.6

2.6

2.0

2.7

2.1

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0

Lahore

Gujrat

Sialkot

Gujranwala

Sheikhupura

Vehari

Faisalabad

Sargodha

T.T. Singh

Jhelum

Rawalpindi

R. Y Khan

Khushab

Narowal

Bahawalpur

Nankana Sahib

Bhakkar

Hafizabad

Lodhran

Okara

Mianwali

Khanewal

Attock

Bahawalnagar

Chakwal

Layyah

Multan

Muzaffargarh

Pakpattan

Rajanpur

Sahiwal

D.G. Khan

Kasur

Jhang

M.B.DinDi

stric

ts

Watercourses per Supervisor & %Age Achievement

W/Cs per Supervisor

Achievement



OFWM: Lined Length in Irrigated Areas (District Wise)

1.02

0.78

1.03

0.59

1.17

1.00

0.68

1.07

0.70

1.06

0.67

0.68

0.59

0.97

0.84

1.14

0.94

1.03

1.08

1.10

0.69

0.57

0.58

0.90

0.60

0.42

0.66

0.48

0.83

0.38

0.34

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00

Bahawalnagar

Bahawalpur

R.Y. Khan

D.G. Khan

Layyah

M. Garh

Rajanpur

Faisalabad

Jhang

T.T. Singh

Bhakkar

Khushab

Mianwali

Sargodha

Khanewal

Lodhran

Multan

Pakpattan

Sahiwal

Vehari

Kasur

Lahore

Nankana

Okara

Sheikhupura

Gujranwala

Gujrat

Hafizabad

M.B. Din

Narowal

SialkotD

istri

ct

Bricklined length (Km)



OFWM: Average Cost per Meter of Lining (District Wise)

751

775

728

967

735

835

830

721

954

703

744

738

367

758

695

710

464

667

439

941

838

826

738

818

708

635

710

660

630

631

713

716

765

743

324

256

354

329

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Bahawalnagar

Bahawalpur

R. Y Khan

D.G. Khan

Layyah

Muzaffargarh

Rajanpur

Faisalabad

Jhang

T.T. Singh

Gujranwala

Gujrat (Irrigated)

Gujrat (Barani)

Hafizabad

M.B.Din

Narowal (Irrigated)

Narowal (Barani)

Sialkot (Irrigated)

Sialkot (Barani)

Kasur

Lahore

Nankana Sahib

Okara

Sheikhupura

Khanewal

Lodhran

Multan

Pakpattan

Sahiwal

Vehari

Bhakkar

Khushab

Mianwali

Sargodha

Attock

Chakwal

Jhelum

RawalpindiD

istri

cts

/ (A

rea)

Construction Cost (Rs.)



OFWM: Average Cost per Meter of Lining (District Wise)

967

954

941

838

835

830

826

818

775

765

758

751

744

743

738

738

735

728

721

716

713

710

710

708

703

695

667

660

635

631

630

464

439

367

354

329

324

256

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

D.G. Khan

Jhang

Kasur

Lahore

Muzaffargarh

Rajanpur

Nankana Sahib

Sheikhupura

Bahawalpur

Mianwali

Hafizabad

Bahawalnagar

Gujranwala

Sargodha

Gujrat (Irrigated)

Okara

Layyah

R. Y Khan

Faisalabad

Khushab

Bhakkar

Multan

Narowal (Irrigated)

Khanewal

T.T. Singh

M.B.Din

Sialkot (Irrigated)

Pakpattan

Lodhran

Vehari

Sahiwal

Narowal (Barani)

Sialkot (Barani)

Gujrat (Barani)

Jhelum

Rawalpindi

Attock

ChakwalD

istri

cts

/ (A

rea)

Construction Cost (Rs.)

Barani Areas



OFWM: Percentage Farmers’ Share (District Wise)

32

31

29

28

28

28

27

27

26

26

26

26

25

25

25

23

22

22

22

22

21

21

20

20

20

20

19

19

19

18

18

17

16

16

15

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Gujrat

Mianwali

Narowal

Hafizabad

M.B.Din

Kasur

Chakwal

R. Y Khan

Khushab

Lahore

Sialkot

Pakpattan

Bhakkar

Gujranwala

Nankana Sahib

Rajanpur

Bahawalnagar

Sargodha

Vehari

Lodhran

Sahiwal

Attock

Khanewal

Bahawalpur

Multan

Jhelum

Sheikhupura

Layyah

Rawalpindi

D.G. Khan

Faisalabad

T.T. Singh

Okara

Jhang

MuzaffargarhD

istri

cts

Percentage Share by Farmers



FIXATION & ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL RATES

1. FIXATION OF RATES BY DRACs: At every district, a District Implementation Committee (DIC) has been

constituted to implement the program. Its chairman is District Coordination

Officer while EDO (F&P), EDO (Agri), DO (OFWM) and Executive Engineer

(Irrigation) are its member. This committee is required to meet on monthly

basis. Its functions among others are to

1. Review physical and financial progress. 2. Review progress about the flow of funds. 3. Monitoring of physical progress. 4. Ensure effective implementation of program.

In order to keep constant vigilance on rates and review / refix them a

unique arrangement is existing. In every district, DIC has constituted its sub-

committee named District Rates Assessment Committee (DRAC) which constantly

meets and reviews/refixes rates of construction material. Its chairman is EDO

(F&P) while DO (Buildings), DO (OFWM), Field Engineer (PWMC) are its members.

All the members are required to make analysis of rates prevailing in local

areas/markets. Field Engineer PWMC is also required to analyze rates and

present in the meeting. DRAC fixes rates for a specific period and

reviews/refixes rates keeping in view the fluctuation of rates in local

areas/markets.

2. MONITORING OF RATES BY PMU:

Due to great significance of the rates of construction material PMU, NPIW

(PC) has been keeping constant vigilance and monitoring on the rates fixed by

DRACs. Assistant Regional Managers, PMU, NPIW (Punjab Component) have been

assigned the duty to monitor the rates in their respective regions by comparing

with prevailing market rates. In case if an abnormal increase in rates is found, it

is conveyed to the concerned DCO, DO (OFWM), EDO (F&P) and consultant of

PWMC for its rectification.

Mr. Ijaz Ahmed Minhas Deputy Director (Finance)



Rates of analysis is also being made regularly by PMU, NPIW (PC)

headquarter. If any abnormal difference is observed it is conveyed to Secretary,

Government of the Punjab, Agriculture Department, Director General,

Agriculture (WM), DCOs concerned for rectification.

3. RATES OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL FOR 2005-06: Rates of construction material fixed by DRACs in different districts of the

Punjab during the year 2005-06 are shown in table no. 1

Table No. 1: Rate of Construction Material for the year 2005-06

Sr. # Districts Bricks/1000 Sand (C.M) Cement/ Bag

Nakkas 20"

Nakkas 24"

1 Bahawalpur *1650-1800 400 310 410-435 510-535 2 Bahawalnagar *1420-1700 320-405 300-305 435 535 3 R. Y. Khan *1920 293 305 380 490 4 D. G. Khan 2100-2200 300 300 390 490 5 Muzaffargarh 2000-2500 450 280-320 415 520 6 Layyah 3000 350 320 415 520 7 Rajanpur 2250-2450 200-250 295 365 465 8 Multan 1900-2300 340 325 410 510 9 Lodhran 1850 315 330 395 490 10 Khanewal 2400 265 300 400 500 11 Vehari 2080 290 320 400 500 12 Pakpattan 2050-2300 240 310 340 440 13 Sahiwal 2650 320 300 425 525 14 Lahore 3750 340 315 425 525 15 Sheikhupura 3250 350 320 400 500 16 Kasur 3100 212 292 345 451 17 Okara 2300-2900 315 330 395 490 18 Nankana Sahib 2950-3240 320 300 425 525 19 Faisalabad 2691-2789 328-362 311 380 480 20 Jhang 2500-2700 325 310 390 490 21 T.T. Singh 2300-2650 325 292 412 515 22 Sargodha 3050-3200 340 350 385 450 23 Khushab *2500-2700 400 315 400 500 24 Bhakkar *1800-1900 300 290 425 525 25 Mianwali 2300-2500 380 290 425 525 26 Gujranwala 3000-3200 250-300 295 375 490



27 Hafizabad 3050 330 320 375-425 490-525 28 Narowal 2800-3000 350-420 315-335 375 450 29 Sialkot 3000-3200 250-300 325-330 390 450 30 M.B.Din 3000 340 325 360 455 31 Gujrat 2800-3200 240 290-310 330 430

Source: Regional Manager's Reports. * rate at source Graph No.1 demonstrates the Maximum rates of construction material in

various districts.

Graph No. 1

1800

1700

1920

2200

2500

3000

2450

2300

2650

2300

2400

2080

1850

3750

3250

3100

2900

3240

2789

2700

2650

3200

2700

1900

2500

3200

3050

3000

3200

3000

3200

400

405

293

300

450

350

250

340

320

240

265

290

315

340

350

212

315

320

362

325

325

340

400

300

380

300

330

420

300

340

240

310

305

305

300

320

320

295

325

300

310

300

320

330

315

320

292

330

300

311

310

292

350

315

290

290

295

320

335

330

325

310

435

435

380

390

415

415

365

410

425

340

400

400

395

425

400

345

395

425

380

390

412

385

400

425

425

375

425

375

390

360

330

535

535

490

490

520

520

465

510

525

440

500

500

490

500

451

490

525

480

490

515

450

500

525

525

490

525

450

450

455

430

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500

Bahawalpur

Bahawalnagar

R.Y.Khan

D.G.Khan

Muzaffargard

Layyah

Rajanpur

Multan

Sahiwal

Pakpattan

Khanewal

Vehari

Lodhran

Lahore

Sheikhupura

Kasur

Okara

Nankana Sahib

Faisalabad

Jhang

T.T.Singh

Sargodha

Khushab

Bhakkar

Mianwali

Gujranwala

Hafizabad

Narowal

Sialkot

M.B.Din

Gujrat

Bricks/1000

Sand

Cement

Nakkas 20"

Nakkas 24"



4. ANALYSIS OF RATES OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL:

4.1 Rates of Bricks:

Bricks rates were found different in different areas. In the districts of Ex-

Bahawalpur division, Bricks rates ranged from Rs.1420 – 1920. In districts of Ex-

D.G.Khan division, rates were from Rs.2000 – 3000. In districts of Ex-Multan

division rates were from Rs.1850 – 2650. In districts of Lahore division rates were

from Rs.2300 – 3750. In districts of Ex-Faisalabad division, rates remained from

Rs.2300 – 2789. In districts of Ex-Sargodha division rates ranged from Rs.1800 –

3200. In districts of Ex-Gujranwala division, rates were from Rs.2800 – 3200.

Highest bricks rate in Punjab was Rs.3750 in district Lahore while lowest bricks

rate was Rs.1420 which was found in district Bahawalnagar. Graphically

maximum brick rates are shown in Graph No.2.

Graph No.2

Comparison of Maximum Rates of Bricks

1800

1700 19

20

2200

2500

3000

2450

2300

2650

2300 24

00

2080

1850

3750

3250

3100

2900

2789

2700

2650

3200

2700

1900

2500

3200

3050

3000 32

00

3000 32

00

3240

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Baha

wal

pur

Baha

wal

naga

r

R.Y

.Kha

n

D.G

.Kha

n

Muz

affa

rgar

d

Layy

ah

Raj

anpu

r

Mul

tan

Sahi

wal

Pakp

atta

n

Khan

ewal

Veha

ri

Lodh

ran

Laho

re

Shei

khup

ura

Kasu

r

Oka

ra

Nan

kana

Sah

ib

Fais

alab

ad

Jhan

g

T.T.

Sing

h

Sarg

odha

Khus

hab

Bhak

kar

Mia

nwal

i

Guj

ranw

ala

Haf

izab

ad

Nar

owal

Sial

kot

M.B

.Din

Guj

rat



4.2 Rates of Sand:

Sand rates were different in different areas. In the district of

Ex-Bahawalpur division, Sand rates ranged from Rs.320 – 405. In districts of Ex-

D.G.Khan division, rates were from Rs.200 – 450. In districts of Ex-Multan division

rates were from Rs.240 – 340. In districts of Ex-Lahore division rates were from

Rs.212 – 350. In districts of Ex-Faisalabad division, rates remained from Rs.325 -

362. In districts of Ex-Sargodha division rates were ranged from Rs.300 – 400. In

districts of Ex-Gujranwala division, rates were from Rs.250 – 420. Highest sand

rate in Punjab was Rs.450 in district Muzaffargarh while lowest sand rate was

Rs.200 which was found in district Rajanpur. Graphical representation of

Maximum Sand rates in different districts is as shown in Graph No. 3.

Graph No.3

4.3 Rates of Cement:

Cement rates were different in different areas. In the district of Ex-

Bahawalpur division, Cement rates ranged from Rs.300 – 310. In districts of Ex-

D.G.Khan division, rates were from Rs.280 – 320. In districts of Ex-Multan division

Comparison of Maximum Rates of Sand (C.M)

400

405

293

300

450

350

250

340

320

240 26

5 290 31

5 340 350

212

315

320

362

325

325 34

0

400

300

380

300 33

0

420

300

340

240

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Baha

wal

pur

Baha

wal

naga

r

R.Y

.Kha

n

D.G

.Kha

n

Muz

affa

rgar

d

Layy

ah

Raj

anpu

r

Mul

tan

Sahi

wal

Pakp

atta

n

Khan

ewal

Veha

ri

Lodh

ran

Laho

re

Shei

khup

ura

Kasu

r

Oka

ra

Nan

kana

Sah

ib

Fais

alab

ad

Jhan

g

T.T.

Sing

h

Sarg

odha

Khus

hab

Bhak

kar

Mia

nwal

i

Guj

ranw

ala

Haf

izab

ad

Nar

owal

Sial

kot

M.B

.Din

Guj

rat



rates were from Rs.300 – 330. In districts of Ex-Lahore division rates were from

Rs.292 – 320. In districts of Ex-Faisalabad division, rates remained from Rs.292 –

311. In Ex-Sargodha division rates were ranged from Rs.290 – 350. In districts of

Ex-Gujranwala division, rates were from Rs.290 – 335. Highest cement rates in

Punjab was found Rs.350 which was in district Sargodha while lowest Cement

rate was Rs.290 which was found in Bhakkar and Mianwali districts. Graphical

representation of Maximum Rates of Cement in various districts is shown in

Graph No. 4.

Graph No.4

4.4 Rates of Nakkas 20”:

Nakkas 20” rates were different in different areas. In the district of Ex-

Bahawalpur division, nakkas 20”rates ranged from Rs.380 – 435. In districts of

Ex-D.G.Khan division, rates were from Rs.365 – 415. In districts of Ex-Multan

division rates were from Rs.400 – 425. In districts of Ex-Lahore division rates

were from Rs.345 – 425. In districts of Ex-Faisalabad division, rates remained

from Rs.380 – 412. In districts of Ex-Sargodha division rates were ranged from

Rs.385 – 425. In districts of Ex-Gujranwala division, rates were from Rs.350 –

Comparison of Maximum Rates of Cement/Bag

310

305

305

300 32

0

320

295 32

5

300

310

300 32

0 330

315

320

292 33

0

300 311

310

292

350

315

290

290

295 32

0 335

330

325

310

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Baha

wal

pur

Baha

wal

naga

r

R.Y

.Kha

n

D.G

.Kha

n

Muz

affa

rgar

d

Layy

ah

Raj

anpu

r

Mul

tan

Sahi

wal

Pakp

atta

n

Khan

ewal

Veha

ri

Lodh

ran

Laho

re

Shei

khup

ura

Kasu

r

Oka

ra

Nan

kana

Sah

ib

Fais

alab

ad

Jhan

g

T.T.

Sing

h

Sarg

odha

Khus

hab

Bhak

kar

Mia

nwal

i

Guj

ranw

ala

Haf

izab

ad

Nar

owal

Sial

kot

M.B

.Din

Guj

rat



425. Highest rate of Nakkas 20” in Punjab was Rs.435 which was found in

districts Bahawalpur & Bahawalnagar while lowest Nakkas 20” rate was Rs.340

which was found in district Pakpattan. Graphical representation of Maximum

Rates of Nakkas 20” has been shown in Graph No. 5.

Graph No.5

4.5 Rates of Nakkas 24”:

Nakkas 24” rates were different in different areas. In the district of Ex-

Bahawalpur division, Nakkas 24” rates ranged from Rs.490 – 535. In Ex-D.G.Khan

division, rates were from Rs.465 – 520. In districts of Ex-Multan division rates

were from Rs.440 – 525. In districts of Ex-Lahore division rates were from Rs.451

– 525. In districts of Ex-Faisalabad division, rates remained from Rs.480 – 515. In

districts of Ex-Sargodha division rates ranged from Rs.450 – 525. In districts of

Ex-Gujranwala division, rates were from Rs.450 – 525. Highest Nakkas 24” rate in

Punjab was found to be Rs.535 which was in districts Bahawalpur &

Bahawalnagar while lowest Nakka 24” rate was Rs.440 which was found in

Comparison of Maximum Rates of Nakkas 20"

435

435

380 390 41

5

415

365

410 42

5

340

400

400

395 42

5

400

345

395 42

5

380 390 41

2

385 40

0 425

425

375

425

375 39

0

360

330

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500



district Pakpattan. Graphical representation of Maximum Rates of Nakkas 24” in

various districts have been shown in Graph No.6.

Graph No.6

5. CONCLUSION:

One of the important activities of NPIW is the fixation of rates of

construction material on the basis of which estimates for the

construction/improvement of watercourses are finalized. It is required that

rates may be fixed rationally on the basis of market rates. It will have an

economical benefit on the program. Regular monitoring of rates of construction

material by PMU, NPIW (PC) has certainly resulted in controlling unrealistic

prices of items of construction material in the Punjab. It would also result in

keeping the prices close to the cost estimates provided in PC-I.

Comparison of Maximum Rates of Nakkas 24"

535

535

490

490 52

0

520

465 51

0

525

440 50

0

500

490 52

5

500

451 49

0 525

480

490 51

5

450 50

0 525

525

490 52

5

450

450

455

430

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Baha

wal

pur

Baha

wal

naga

r

R.Y

.Kha

n

D.G

.Kha

n

Muz

affa

rgar

d

Layy

ah

Raj

anpu

r

Mul

tan

Sahi

wal

Pakp

atta

n

Khan

ewal

Veha

ri

Lodh

ran

Laho

re

Shei

khup

ura

Kasu

r

Oka

ra

Nan

kana

Sah

ib

Fais

alab

ad

Jhan

g

T.T.

Sing

h

Sarg

odha

Khus

hab

Bhak

kar

Mia

nwal

i

Guj

ranw

ala

Haf

izab

ad

Nar

owal

Sial

kot

M.B

.Din

Guj

rat



FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF NPIW

1. FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF NPIW DEMANDING ATTENTION:

1.1 Govt & Farmers’ Share Proportions: During the year 2005-06 Rs. 740.003 million were contributed by the

farmers against the government releases of Rs. 2662.530 million. Government

releases to the WUAs amounting to Rs.75.278 million remained un-utilized and

were outstanding against these WUAs at the end of the year 2005-06. If an

amount of Rs.34.737 million recoverable from the year 2004-05 is also added, a

total of Rs.110.015 million was outstanding on 1st July 2006 against the WUAs. It

means that this much amount was paid to the WUAs in excess of the actual

requirements. Reasons for these amounts being surplus with the WUAs and

recoverable, interalia, includes the following:

• Incorrect cost estimation of work by the DO (OFWM) and PWMC.

• Lack of effective financial monitoring which led to release of 2nd and 3rd

installment without looking into the actual expenditure/requirement.

• Certification of lesser amount by the PWMC owing to certain shortfalls.

• Advance payments for the Pre-cast Parabolic Lining (PCPL) segments to

the manufacturing firms.

Recovery of this huge amount of Rs. 110.015 million has turned out to be

one of the major issues faced by the NPIW during the first six months of the

financial year 2006-07. An effective campaign for the recovery was initiated by

the PMU for speedy recovery of the government revenues. As a result of this

campaign, along with the active participation of Secretary Agriculture and

sincere efforts made by the Water Management Department and the district

government, 78% of the total recoverable amount had been recovered and

deposited into the government account by the end of December 2006. Recovery

Dr. Ijaz Mansoor Director (Finance)



position of the fifteen districts having the highest recoverable amount is given

below:-

Sr.# Districts

Total Amount recoverable for the year 2004-05 & 2005-06

Amount Recovered (RM & DOs

figures)

Percentage Recovery Balance

1 Kasur 12,030,079 8,327,837 69.23 3,702,242

2 Muzaffargarh 11,855,636 11,401,326 96.17 454,310

3 D.G.Khan 11,330,852 9,600,125 84.73 1,730,727

4 Bahawalpur 8,012,859 7,597,052 94.81 415,807

5 Faisalabad 7,157,469 5,210,503 72.80 1,946,966

6 Sahiwal 6,537,982 4,555,180 69.67 1,982,802

7 T.T.Sing 5,022,108 4,232,241 84.27 789,867

8 Bahawalnagar 4,964,757 4,964,757 100.0 -

9 Okara 4,952,709 3,081,896 62.23 1,870,813

10 Jhang 4,555,024 2,779,460 61.02 1,775,564

11 Vehari 3,985,004 3,834,835 96.23 150,169

12 Lahore 3,886,613 3,682,908 94.76 203,705

13 Rajanpur 3,402,750 2,727,464 80.15 675,286

14 R.Y.Khan 2,936,382 1,617,909 55.10 1,318,473

15 Multan 2,737,838 1,355,291 49.50 1,382,547

16 Other Districts 16,647,396 11,664,548 70.07 4,982,848

GRAND TOTAL 110,015,458 86,633,332 78.75 23,382,126

No doubt this progress is a great success as compared to the recovery

position in the previous projects of same nature where crores of rupees are still

recoverable, it does not relieve the water management department and the

consultant of their duties of being vigilant and watchful about the correct

assessment of the capital requirements for a particular water course and the

actual expenditure being incurred. Quality of work, which was one of the factors



for increase in recoverable amount as mentioned above, is to be ensured by the

consultants and the NPIW staff through periodical site visits and application of

quality checks.

Water management department and the consultants are required to

strengthen and devise an elaborate system for correct cost estimation, financial

monitoring and quality assurance to avoid such overpayments to the WUAs in

future. By avoiding repetition of the same financial mismanagement precious

man hours of the PMU, the department and the district governments being

consumed on effecting recoveries would be saved for utilization on some

positive and more productive work.

1.2 Maintenance of NPIW Accounts:

Basic purpose of accounting is to provide decision makers with correct

information useful in making economic decisions. An accounting system consists

of the personnel, procedures, devices and records used by an entity in

developing accounting information and communicating this information to the

decision makers/stakeholders.

An elaborate accounting system to maintain the accounts of the NPIW

does not seem to exist at departmental level. Maintenance of accounting record

and flow of accounting information from the WUA and the DO (OFWM) is not well

structured. Professional accountants are not available at the grass root level of

the water management department and same is the situation at the supervisory

level at the top. The main document maintained in the DO (OFWM) office is a

small register in which the budget, expenditure and the balance is entered.

Expenditure is entered when advice to the District Accounts Office (DAO) for

payment to the WUAs is issued. Definitely, it is not the cash book and is not

signed by the authorized officer. Monthly reconciliation of expenditure with the

Accounts Office, which plays pivotal role in good financial management, is not in

vogue as per codal requirements in many districts. In one of the districts this



reconciliation process was confined only to taking the figures from DAO for

acceptance by the department.

As a result of absence of an adequate and comprehensive system of

accounting in the department, the accounting information being produced by

the department and the consultant usually does not tally and leads to confusion

and raises doubts on reliability of the accounting data. Example of difference of

figures of unspent balance at the end of the year 2005-06 and expenditure on

civil works during the same year, as given below, are sufficient to prove this

point.

Expenditure head Departmental

figures (Rs. in million)

Consultant’s figures

(Rs. in million)

Difference (Rs. in million)

Un-spent balance (civil works as on 30. 6.06)

243.497 283.173 39.676

Expenditure on civil works (2005-06) 2667.251 2662.530 4.721

In order to establish reliability of the accounting data and to report the

correct figure to the decision makers in time, an elaborate & comprehensive

accounting system is indispensable for this program. Having a financial outlay of

more than Rs. 28000 million, the program definitely deserves a better

accounting system.

1.3 Strengthening Internal Control System/Internal Audit:

Internal controls are all measures taken by an organization for the

purpose of (1) protecting its resources against waste, fraud or inefficient use; (2)

ensuring the reliability of accounting data; (3) securing compliance with the

management’s policies; and (4) evaluating the performance of all employees,

managers and the departments within the organization.



As already mentioned the primary objective of the accounting system is to

provide useful information to the decision makers. The objective of the internal

control system is to keep the activities “on track”. These two systems are

closely related; in fact each depends greatly on the other. Internal controls fall

into two broad categories: accounting controls and administrative controls.

Accounting controls are measures that relate directly to the protection of assets

or to the reliability of accounting information while the administrative controls

are measures designed to increase operational efficiency.

Internal audit, a management tool to evaluate the organizational

performance, is an important part of the internal controls. With a good internal

audit system in place, a lot of improvement in the organizational performance

can be achieved. Every large organization has an internal auditing wing which

test and evaluate both accounting controls and the administrative controls in all

areas of the organization and report to the top management. The internal audit

reports serve as wake up calls for the management about possibility of any

wrong doings within the organization. Thus timely corrective measures become

possible with the help of these reports.

Water management department and the district governments, which are

the executing agencies of this multi billion rupees program, lack a well defined

system of internal controls/internal audit. It is required that the agencies

executing this program should strengthen their internal controls and set up

internal audit wing which should regularly submit reports to the management.



PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

A PRIME CHALLENGE

Performance appraisal remains the corner stone of Human Resource

Management. The Admin Wing of Program Management Unit, National Program

for Improvement of Watercourses has designed a Performance Management

System by devising Performance Appraisal Forms (FY- 2005-06) for three critical

posts in NPIW Field Teams i.e. Assistant Agriculture Engineer, Water

Management Officer & Supervisor.

Systematic evaluation of development program is generally conceived and

formulized with an idea to have ‘Objective’ assessments done by ‘Independent’

persons using ‘Professional’ methods of data collection and analysis. This is a

formative evaluation commonly done more than once for a particular scheme.

The concepts of “Evaluation”, “Appraisal” and “Monitoring”

interchangeable as they may seem, are different in connotation and nuances.

Appraisal is the critical examination of a proposal / Program / Project. The first

step in the performance appraisal process is identifying what is to be measured.

This process seems fairly simple at the first glance. In practice, however, it can

be quite complicated. Identification of performance dimensions is the important

first step in the performance appraisal process. If a significant dimension is

overlooked, employee’s morale is likely to suffer because one who does well on

that dimension will not be recognized or rewarded. If otherwise, employee may

perceive the whole appraisal process as meaningless. Moreover, it is often

difficult to quantify performance dimensions.

METHODOLOGY / OUT LOOK:

There are 260 NPIW field teams in the irrigated areas of Punjab. Each

field team is constituted by an Assistant Agriculture Engineer, Water

Management officer, five Supervisors and a Data Entry Operator. However, in

field constitution of teams in terms of number of Supervisors is different in every

Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Kharal Assistant Project Director



district. Target assigned to each team depends upon number of Supervisors.

Normally, it does not exceed five watercourses per supervisor.

Given this back ground, the Performance Appraisal Forms (PAFs) were

designed in a manner that suited the requirements of the program involving

various stakeholders. Key performance indicators / dimensions were carefully

selected. Performance Appraisal Forms (PAFs) were circulated throughout

Punjab where NPIW Field teams are currently working. These were meant for

gauging performance of AAEs, WMOs & Supervisors during the FY 2005-06. NPIW

targets for each supervisor, WMO & AAE were made a yardstick. After retrieval

of PAFs, entries were made in customized software for the purpose of analysis.

The response from field was overwhelmingly encouraging and the quality

of assessment was satisfactory. The PAFs retrieved reflect that overall

performance of the key NPIW staff responsible for the achievement of targets

remained satisfactory as depicted by the graphs below.

Recommendation for AAEs

Total, 96

No, 5

Yes, 91

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

No.

Of A

AEs

TotalYesNo

Recommendations

Recommended

Recommended



Recommendations

Recommended

Recommended

Recommendation for WMOs

No, 4

Total, 130 Yes, 126

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

No. o

f WM

Os Total

YesNo

Recommendation for Supervisors

Total, 946 Yes, 899

No, 47

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

No.

of S

uper

viso

rs

Total

Yes

No

Recommendations

Recommended

Recommended



This is the first performance appraisal exercise in this program. It will help key

stakeholders in assessing the performance of key team members and comparing

them with the actual targets as per the Time Bound Action Plan (TBAP). The

PMU has intentionally kept these PAFs simple, focused and target oriented.

However, in the FY 2006-07, some major changes will be brought about in the

said forms taking stock of present year’s performance and key lessons learned in

FY 2005-06. The Performance Appraisal forms have achieved the fundamental

purpose of monitoring i.e. assessing performance of personnel, relating to

various components of watercourse improvement.

The specimens of PAFs for AAEs, WMOs and Supervisors have been enclosed in

the following pages.



ROLE OF MEDIA

This mega project with a record allocation is meant solely, for the

welfare of the farming community of Punjab. This community has to be

mobilized and motivated to fully participate in the implementation of the

program by organizing active and dynamic watercourse associations for this

purpose.

The salient feature and benefits of the project need to be highlighted to

persuade the farmers. Besides programs of awareness in the shape of seminars,

workshops, festivals, farmers’ days etc, print and electronic media, as per plan

given here, will be used for motivating farmers through highlighting envisaged

benefits of the program, procedures and prescribed standards with

specifications.

Though Mass media can reach a common farmer easily at comparitivelly

lesser cost. Television & Radio are now available in almost every nook and

corner of the Province and people are tuned to this powerful media. It can pay

high dividends in the shape of high productivity and prosperity to common

farmer, if the mass media outlets are fully utilized in propagation of agriculture

messages in time.

Role of Media in NPIW is significant because of the vast magnitude of the

program. In the present world of Globalization no one can ignore importance of

Media and advertising. Accordingly Media campaign was launched to create

awareness about NPIW amongst the masses.

1. ROLE OF PRINT MEDIA: a) Newspapers: Newspapers are most important component of Media campaign and are

being used to disseminate the message of NPIW. Advertisements with the

captions of improved Watercourses and photographs of President and C.M. were

published in all Newspapers having national circulation. The procedure and

Dr. Ahmad Afnan Assistant Director (Admin)



specifications of Construction of Watercourses were given in these

advertisements in a very simple but convincing manner. The farmers were

advised to organize WUA (Water users association) and get the same registered

with concerned DO (OFWM).

Newspapers with wide range of circulation are vital in Media campaign.

These are effective even in remote areas where other Medias like T.V are

unavailable for want of electricity. These advertisements were given in Urdu

that is easily understandable by farmers.

In the last quarter of financial year 2006 Media campaign was launched

with full vigour. Advertisements were given in Newspaper having wide

circulation like “Daily Jang”, “Nawa-e-waqt” & “Khabrain” at the cost of

Rs.804117/-. Message for improvement of Watercourses for water conservation

was widely spread out. It created great impact for watercourses completion by

persuading the community to participate volunatarily in the program of National

interest.

b) Newsletter: PMU took an initiative to bring out a newsletter on monthly basis with an

objective to depict program activities. Newsletters were published in October &

December, 2006. October edition contained message of C.M, Report of meeting

of Federal Coordination Committee, Visit of PMU by Federal Secretary

Agriculture, details of Regional Managers Conference, Visit of Federal Project

Director to Barani districts, installation of local area Network in PMU, Assistant

Regional Manager’s Conference and tours of D.G. Agriculture. Overview of

progress of NPIW, made during two years along with strategy of this year was

also included. December edition contained message of canal closure, details of

meeting of Chief Secretary and meetings of Secretary Agriculture, Punjab to

review the progress of districts, along with the report on training of WUAs.

Dr. Pervez Ahmed Khan (Project Director, PMU) as Patron, Mr. Zafar

Abbas (Deputy Director Technical, PMU) as Editor and Dr. Ahmad Afnan



(Assistant Director Admin, PMU) being Co-editor participated for its publications.

Copies of Newsletters were sent to Ministers, Secretaries, Heads of departments

and stakeholders. Regional officers of PMU were given the task to disseminate

NPIW message at Tehsile & WUA level.

2. ROLE OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA: a) T.V: Television is the most powerful medium of communication now-a-days. Its

importance in Media in today’s world is many folds. Both audio and visual

techniques are used in T.V. Any advertisement in T.V. has more effect on

audience as message is delivered in seconds. It is important that video clip

should be purpose oriented and eye-catching. It should be displayed on timings

when farming is accustomed to watch it.

b) Radio: It is the most favorite medium of our rural community. Farmers and

agriculturists in far flung areas are used to listen radio & transistors. Crisp

messages were broadcasted to create awareness among villagers to make them

familiar with the program. Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation was paid

Rs.908227/- out of NPIW funds.

3. OBJECTIVES OF MEDIA CAMPAIGN:

To create awareness among target audience regarding NPIW.

To establish goodwill between the Government Departments & Farming community.

To persuade farmers to take part in development activities.

To disseminate information regarding modalities and procedures of

program implementation.

To provide information material to target audience continuously.

To sensitize the general public about water shortage, prevention of its

wastage and ways to conserve it.

To motivate stakeholders for effective participation & implementation.

To solicit farmers interaction in the building of water courses



To build up an atmosphere for proper utilization of public money.

4. MEDIA STRATEGY: a) Electronic:

Television ads

Video Documentaries

News, Flashes

Interviews & Talk shows

b) Radio:

Radio ads

Jingles

News Bulletins

Interviews & Talk shows

c) Print:

Newspapers

Supplements

Advertisement

Ads in Agricultural Magazines

Pamphlets, Brochures, Posters & leaflets

d) Cinema Publicity:

e) Publicity through C.C. T.V. at Railway Stations:

f) Mass awareness through Farmer’s day & Conventions:

5. TARGET AUDIENCE:

NPIW staff

Irrigation/Agriculture Department

NGO’s/Development Agencies

Journalists/Opinion leaders

FARMERS

WHAT WILL HELP US GET THERE?



6. COMMUNICATION:

a) For NPIW Staff:

In-house Meetings/Presentation

Periodical updates

Notice Board (local rural level)

Newsletter b) For Agriculture Departments:

Presentation

Periodical updates flyer/presentation

Newsletter

Workshops c) For NGO’s/Development Agencies:

NPIW

Radio ads

TVC/

Documentaries

Workshops/

Seminars

Caravans/ Awareness

Walks

Press Ads

Hoardings/ Banners/ Posters

PR Articles/ Newspaper

Supplements Farmer’s Days Fairs/

Panchayat



Presentation

Periodical updates

Newsletter

Workshop

Banners

Awareness walks d) For Journalists/Opinion Leaders:

Press Conferences

Press Ads

Seminars

Internet

TV Documentary

News features

Newsletter

News Items

PR Articles

Opinion Making Columns

e) For Farmers:

TV Commercials

Radio Spots

Newsletters

Outdoor Signage

Fairs

Banners

Posters

Celebrity Endorsement

Wall Chalking

Milestone Chalking

Farmers days

FEW SAMPLES OF PRINT MEDIA COMPAIGN:



THE ROLE OF WATER USER ASSOCIATIONS (WUAs)

1. INTRODUCTION:

The National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (NPIW) started in

2004-05, designed for effective utilization of the available water at the farm

level for enhancing productivity of scarce irrigation resources through

improvement of 28000 watercourses in canal commanded and barani areas of the

Punjab province. Funds have been arranged entirely through local resources;

federal government being the main sponsor contributing Rs. 20,823 million in the

total estimated cost of Rs. 28,233 million. Farmers are the second major

contributor having proposed share of Rs. 7,400 million in the program.

One of the main objectives of the program is strengthening the farmer’s

participation in the program implementation for better management of water at

the farm level. As compared to the previous projects of similar nature, farmers

have been assigned far greater role in implementation of this program including

handling of all the financial matters and execution of all the civil works. They

have also been entrusted to pay the entire labour cost which is about 36% of the

total project cost.

Government has restricted its role to provide funds and technical

assistance only. Funds are provided to the registered WUAs through district

government while the technical assistance is being rendered by Punjab Water

Management Consultants (PWMC). As the main source of funds is the federal

government, the funds are transferred from the federal government to Account-I

of the provincial government. Provincial Steering Committee distributes these

funds to all the district governments depending upon their needs. In the district

government the DCO, being principal accounting officer, authorizes the DO

(OFWM) to utilize these funds in accordance with the applicable rules and

regulations. On the advice of the DO (OFWM) funds are transferred by the

District accounts Office from Account-IV to the accounts of WUAs.

Hafiz Muhammad Ilyas Director (M& E)



Major responsibility of Program Management Unit (PMU) is monitoring and

evaluation of the work being done under the program. PMU is also serving as a

linkage, not only between the PWMC, Water Management Department & WUA

but also between the federal, provincial and district governments.

2. ROLE OF WATER USERS ASSOCIATIONS (WUAs):

It is imperative that role of WUA in implementation of this program is the

understood properly for better understanding of the overview of the financial

administration of the NPIW which is the main theme of this paper.

A WUA, registered under “On Farm Water Management and Water Users

ordinance 1981”, is responsible for the following vital program activities:

• Collection of farmer’s share.

• Arrange skilled and un-skilled labor required for improvement of

watercourses/irrigation schemes.

• Procure construction material for carrying out civil works out of the

project funds.

• Settle matters of disputes between the water users.

• Carry out work in accordance with the specifications.

• Regularly undertake O&M of improved watercourses.

To carry out the above mentioned functions the WUA opens a bank account

jointly operated by the Chairman and Treasurer of that WUA. The government

share for the program, as already mentioned, is transferred from Account-IV of

the district government to the account of the WUA on the authorization by the

DO (OFWM). Farmers’ share is also deposited in the same account. All the

financial transactions required to be carried out for improvement of that water

course are carried out by the WUA itself. Release of funds to the WUA is in

three installments. Each installment is released subject to completion of already

designed protocol of verification by the consultant.



3. MONITORING LEVEL OF COMMUNITY:

NPIW is a development program involving effective participation of the

community in all field activities. This hoped that better results will be achieved

due to community’s interest in the program. In order to sensitize the WUAs

about their role in the program implementation, following activities were

made:-

i. Capacity building through short training courses.

ii. Meetings with the Community.

iii. Interviews of the shareholders of the watercourse.

iv. Photographs of the watercourse at different times during improvement.

v. Brochures / Guidelines for the NPIW staff and the members of WUAs.

4. COMMENTS OF COMMUNITY ABOUT THE NPIW:

i. Farmers’ community have appreciated and welcomed the National

Program for Improvement of Watercourses in Pakistan. The rural

community is of the view that the project is unmatched in the history of

the country when compared with the projects previously launched for the

purpose.

ii. It is appreciated by the Water Users that the procurement of the material

as well as the construction has been left at the disposal of WUA. Farmers’

participation to such an extent has helped a lot towards motivation and

sensitization of the community for the task.

iii. Timely release of Govt share to the WUAs has been highly appreciated by

the community. Earthen improvement work after removal of trees from

the watercourse is a factor which often hinders the pace of work.

iv. The involvement of the District Govt through Revenue field staff for

earthen improvement work as well as collection of farmers’ share is

another aspect appreciated by the farmers’ community.



v. Certain short comings have also been pointed out by the farmers’

community, which are considered by them against the provision/spirit of

the program.

vi. It has been criticized in most of the districts that maximum lining length

to the extent of 30% and 15% in SGW (Saline Ground Water) & FGW (Fresh

Ground Water) areas respectively does not serve the purpose particularly

in sandy areas where katcha watercourse can not be maintained properly.

vii. The water users falling in the earthen portion of the watercourses are of

the view that they have double work as compare to the water users of the

portions to be lined. They often show their willingness to pay farmers’

share even at a higher rate if the lining work is extended beyond the

maximum limit of 30% & 15%.

viii. The cold behaviour of the Forest Department showing reluctance in the

necessary removal of trees growing on the portions irrigating their lands is

another fact or which offends the farmers’ community.

The farmers are of the considered view that if the shortcomings

mentioned above are made up, the program can prove gate way to a green

revolution in the country.

5. CONCLUSION:

All possible efforts were made by all corners i.e. OFWM staff, PMU,

District Administration for the full involvement of the community. All financial

activities were carried out by farmers so that they can have feeling of ownership

and responsibility. By active community involvement, better quality of civil

works and better utilization of financial resources have been achieved.



MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SERVICES AT PMU

INTRODUCTION:

A Management Information Services or MIS wing has been set up at the

Program Management Unit of National Program for Improvement of Watercourses

(Punjab Component). The mandate for the MIS wing is to create watercourse

database system and an application that should assist in analyzing the progress

and status of the project.

This document provides an overview of the Local Area Network (LAN), the

databases and the reporting mechanism that the MIS wing has developed. This

document also provides an overview of the software and design of the software

developed.

THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SERVICES AT THE PMU:

There are four departments or wings at the PMU namely, Administration,

Finance, Technical and MIS. Each of the other wings depend on the MIS wing for

relevant and timely information on technical aspects, financial status,

watercourse improvement activities, and performance of the field teams. The

PMU management team envisions a web based application which allows them to

retrieve this information on their desktops instantaneously.

To serve these requirements, the MIS wing has developed the application

in two phases. In the first phase, we set up an intranet and a Local Area Network

(LAN) at the PMU office. It provides internet connectivity, intra and inter office

email communications, and file/data sharing.

In the second phase we developed the watercourse database and the web

application. This application enabled the decision makers to get real time

Mr. Hasan Abdullah Khan Director (MIS)



reports on watercourse technical data, its financial status, region and individual

level performance etc.

PHASE ONE – MIS INFRA STRUCTURE SETUP:

In this phase, a LAN was set up in the PMU office. The LAN provides the

following functionality.

Hardware Interconnectivity:

The LAN interconnects all the hardware like desktop PCs, laptop PCs,

printers, faxes, scanners etc. This allows us to share hardware resources among

all the users. For example, one can print a document from his or her PC without

being directly connected to the printer. The document may be sent to the

networked printer for printing. Logical view of a typical LAN is shown below.

Databases

Desktop PCs

InternetFirewallWeb Server

Email Server Laptops

Printers, Scanners & Faxes

User Authentication

Ethernet Network



All networked hardware is connected to each other by standard

10/100mbs CAT5 Ethernet cabling and connectors. When a user wants to use a

PC, he must log in the PC using his user name and password. After the user has

been authenticated, he is allowed to use the resources available to him on the

network. Users can also send emails to internal and external users and surf the

internet. Follwing are the main components of the LAN that have been

established at the PMU office.

Ethernet:

Ethernet is LAN technology that transmits information between computers

at 10, 100 or 1000 million bits per second (10/100/1000 mbps). There are

several LAN technologies (token ring, daisy chaining etc.) but Ethernet is by far

the most popular technology for departmental networks. The vast majority of

computer vendors provide equipment with Ethernet attachments making it

possible to link all manner of computers with each other and with peripherals

like printers, scanners and copiers.

The equipment connected to Ethernet, also called stations, operates

independently of all other stations on the network and there is no central

controller. All attached stations are connected to a shared media system. Signals

are broadcasted over the medium (usually a CAT5 cable) to every attached

station. A station listens to the medium and receives signals addressed only to

itself. A station may transmit only when the medium is quiet and no other

station on the network is transmitting. This way all stations get a fair chance at

using the network resources.

User Machines: Users are connected to the network through their machines like laptops

and desktops. Once the machine is plugged in, it becomes part of the network. It

can view and use other resources on the network as per the roles and privileges

assigned to it. In most Ethernet configurations, by default, no other station on



the network may look at any data on the machine. The user must grant explicit

permission to share files and data on his machine.

Email Server:

This server will provide email services to the users. Each user who is

allowed to log in can use his username as his or her email address. Emails may

be sent to internal or external users. Email is not only used to exchange

messages but it can also be used to exchange documents as attachments to

messages.

Currently this functionality has not been implemented rather email

services provided by Punjab Information Technology Department (PITD) are

being used.

Authentication Server:

In a networked environment, all resources and data are visible to all users

all the time. Someone with ill intentions or even accidentally can damage the

resources. For security purposes, all users intending to use the network are

authenticated and then assigned an access privilege level. What this means is

that all users have to log in the system and once they have been identified as

authentic by the server, they have limited access to resources. For example they

are not allowed to access other users’ PCs, if there is a color printer with

expensive print outs, only officers and stenographer may be allowed to print to

it. This is accomplished by assigning roles to users. These roles may be officers,

system administrator, secretary, data entry operator etc.

Web Server:

A web server houses all the information that the general public as well as

internal users can access. This information is served up as web pages in web

browsers. Anyone with an internet connection is allowed to access them. Since



this server also houses internal documents for intra office consumption, only the

users with appropriate access privileges are allowed to view them.

The Firewall:

Since the internal network and the web server are connected to the wide

open Internet, some malicious outside users and hackers might try to break into

our network and cause damage. A software called firewall has been installed to

protect our network from hackers. Firewall allows only certain well known

internet protocols (http, ftp etc.) through and blocks all other

applications/protocols. If an external user wants to access our internal network,

he or she must be authenticated by the system.

PHASE TWO - APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT:

Once the infra structure was set up, the next phase was the development

of the Monitoring and Evaluation Application called MonEva Application from

here on.

There are three databases envisioned, Technical Rectification and

Monitoring System (TERMS), Human Resource (HR), and Financial Tracking and

Monitoring System (FITMAS). These three databases together contain all the

technical, HR, and financial data to enable the decision makers in the four PMU

wings to better do their jobs. These three databases are front ended with a web

based application to enter and view data as well as generate reports as shown in

the figure below.

The whole application is organized into a layered and multi tiered

architecture. Application is split into three tiers to help distribute running loads

into three different server processes. It also enhances security, control, and

efficient use of available resources such as application execution threads,

database connections, memory etc. This Monitoring and Evaluation Application

as a whole is MonEva.



MonEva has three tiers as explained below.

1. Enterprise Information Service (EIS) Tier:

This tier represents the organization’s business information. This tier is

considered the most critical and fundamental part of an enterprise. This tier

must be given the most amount of thought and design time. The EIS essentially

represents the organization’s business and since the business rarely changes

radically, the EIS tier tends to be the most stable tier. Other tiers might evolve

with time but the EIS tier remains relatively stable.

In our case the three databases will constitute the EIS tier. Here is a brief

overview of these databases.

Technical Rectification and Monitoring System (TERMS):

The technical wing of the PMU, NPIW collects data on such aspects of

watercourses as location of watercourse, command area, WUA, civil works

details like how much cement, sand, bricks etc. are being used, progress of the

watercourse improvement over time and so on. Different sections of this

database are shown below.

• Location of the watercourse in terms of village, district, tehsil etc.

EIS Tier Middle Tier

Dat

abas

e A

cces

s L

ayer

(PH

P)

Web

Acc

ess L

ayer

(PH

P, H

TML)

Web Server TERMS

FITMAS HR/PT

Intranet Access To Analytical Reports

Public Access Web Site

Region Data Entry

Internet



• Various attributes of the water course like, amount of allocated water

discharge from the canal, command area, total length.

• WUA details like number of members, names of the members, etc.

• Watercourse Improvement progress details like, sanction date, start and

end dates, etc.

• Civil works details like amount of building material (cement, sand, bricks

etc.) used.

• Monitoring activities like PMU staff visits.

Financial Tracking and Monitoring System (FITMAS): The finance wing of the PMU, NPIW is required to monitor flow of Rs.28.22

billion over a four year period of 2004 to 2008 from federal PSDP all the down to

the 28000 WUAs. The FITMAS database keeps all the data necessary to track and

consolidate flow of funds. A break down of financial information is given below.

• WUA is required to pay its 36% share in two installments. These

installments are recorded.

• The remaining 64% of the expense is paid by the government in three

installments. These installments are tracked in this database.

• Building material costs such as price of cement, sand, bricks and nakkas.

• Labor rates.

• Estimated cost of completion of a water course.

• Actual cost of completion of a water course.

• Monthly balance of WUA bank accounts.

Human Resource (HR) Database:

The admin wing is required to coordinate, monitor, and facilitate the 260

field teams. All personal and professional information about every member of

each team is stored in this database. In addition to this information, a

performance tracking system is built upon this database. Contents of this

database are as shown below.



• Personal details such as name, address, phone numbers, health related

information etc.

• Academic qualifications.

• Performance evaluation information provided by the district offices.

2. The Middle Tier:

The middle tier contains all the business logic associated with the EIS tier.

For example, the data for HR is in the EIS tier but the business logic of

procedures and formulae to calculate performance and incentives is kept in the

middle tier. This tier may be a full blown application server with transaction

control, connection pooling, messaging, business objects etc. or simply SQL

scripts, javascript or PHP. For performance and security reasons, access to the

EIS tier is provided only through the middle tier. No user or application may

connect to or access data directly from EIS.

Database Access Layer: This layer provides isolation of the EIS tier and provides a consistent

interface to the information. A JDBC driver, or a standard API by the database

vendor are examples of this layer. This layer is not developed by the application

developers instead it is provided by the database vendor.

3. The Client Tier:

The client tier provides user interface and access points to the

application. Client tier might be a thin client like a web browser; a fat client

like GUI based application connected to the middle tier, or a communication

application like hyperterminal etc.

MonEva provides access to data only through web browsers. The Data

Entry Operators in different regions are external users who are given a secure

access to the intranet. This allows them to submit their watercourse data via

dial up.

Reporting:



All types of reports are distributed over the intranet to internal PMU users

and through internet to all external users. There are two types of reports, fixed

and real time.

Fixed reports like fortnightly and monthly reports are pre-generated and

available as html documents and in PDF downloadable format which may be

instantly viewed or printed from the web browser. The other group of reports is

real time reports, meaning that a report may be generated at any time and

spanning any period of time.

There is one exception to this web access rule…sometimes a report is

needed that doesn’t fit into the pre-defined report format and contents. In this

case, a special request is made to the MIS wing and the report will be generated

by directly accessing the Database Access layer of the middle tier.

PHASE THREE:

There is a third phase in the development of MonEva. The management of

NPIW has also envisioned graphical information system (GIS) based

representation of a multi-dimensional information system. This system will link

census database, NPIW database and a digital maps database together. This will

allow the decision makers to click on map of an area and get watercourses

information for the area, they can find out what impact OFWM has had on the

area’s residents, and they can find out what has been the impact on poverty

reduction in the area. The possibilities of applications of such a

multidimensional database are unlimited.

Phase three is being designed at this time therefore it is beyond the scope

of this document.



Physical Architecture of MonEva:

The figure below shows physical architecture of the MonEva application

components as deployed over different networked resources.

Web Server:

Currently the web server hosted at the PITD offices. PMU web site is

deployed there along with the PHP dlls. Once the PMU has enough resources, the

web server shall be moved to the HQ premises.

This server hosts the web pages for information, data entry and reporting

screens. The entire user interface of MonEva is through this server.

Database Server:

This machine hosts MonEva database server. All access to end users to this

database is only through MonEva web screens.

Desktop PCs and Laptops:

These machines are interconnected and connected to the servers via LAN.

The end users at the PMU HQ access MonEva via these machines on web

browsers. Regional offices access MonEva though the web site by logging in and

then perform data entry operations.



Network Server:

This is the server machine that enables all the above servers and clients

to talk to each other securely but transparently. This machine is a proxy server,

authentication server and also performs functionality of a firewall.

OPEN SOURCE TECHNOLOGIES EMPLOYED:

Currently there are two schools of thought in software development

business. One claims that software is intellectual property and must be

protected by copyrights and the source code is closed and proprietary.

Businesses are built around selling software licenses to the users. Users have

limited rights as far as copying and installation of software is concerned. Users

have no right as far as ownership of source code is concerned.

The other school believes that software should be open sourced and

shared by all. Users must be allowed to view, change and use the software as

they please thus the term Open Source and Free(OSF) software. Even though

most of the open source software is free of cost, but free here does not

necessarily mean free of cost. It just means that one is free to modify and use

the software as one wants. Also software may open sourced but not free. But

OSF is not allowed to be sold. Businesses are built around selling support services

and not around selling licenses to use the software.

The MIS wing has decided to use the OSF for all of the software installed

in the central server. Examples are, GNU/Linux Operating System, iptables

firewall, Samba file sharing, PHP and various other GNU utilities. This has saved

PMU large amount of cost in license fees.



IMPLEMENTATION OF LAN / WAN AT PMU

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The MIS Department, Program Management Unit, NPIW (PC) have

configured a LAN/ WAN environment in Client/Server mode using Open Source

based Red Hat Linux Advanced Server AS 4.0. Latest Dell PowerEdge 2800, which

was purchased with three hot swappable SCSI hard drives configured in RAID 5

configuration. A high speed DSL connection was purchased from NTC to fulfill

the Internet needs of head office in shared manners. To establish the LAN in

domain based client/server environment (intranet) and to configure the email

and web domain of the organization we need:

1. Latest branded server based Pentium IV Computer

2. Hardware Accessories

3. Software Packages

4. Email and Web domain registration with coordination of Punjab I.T

Department

5. High speed Internet Link

6. Direct Telephone Lines

Mr. Nadeem Ashraf System Analyst



The official website of NPIW (http://npiw.punjab.gov.pk) has been

registered and official email accounts are setup (e.g. [email protected]),

we consulted the representatives from Punjab I.T Department who provided us

these WAN based facilities. The website and emails are hosted on their servers

and are accessed through using Internet. In future we may modify and update

this setup according to our needs. As we have implemented the Open source

technologies, so changes in the setup, like switching to in house email server

setup, web server etc, would not be problematic and we need not to purchase

email or web server.

2. INTRODUCTION:

According to the preliminary analysis of existing setup, present in head

office of PMU (Punjab), there were total thirteen computers, which included

eight Desktop and five laptops, present in this office. Windows Xp based

computers are interlinked as workgroup environment. No central authentication

and control was established in the network. Every user was an administrator of

its own computer. If users needed to use Internet then separate dialup

connections were used from these computers as no high speed Internet Link &

common Internet sharing was available. No official email account was available

and for official correspondence yahoo or ISP based email accounts were used.

Security against viruses was not implemented. No monitoring and control

mechanism was present, which can log the user’s activities, such as Internet

surfing, data sharing, security checks etc.

To overcome all these problems a Client/Server based network was

proposed and configured in PMU head office. This was one of the mandates of

MIS Wing of PMU.

2.1 LAN Topology of Network:

In order to interconnect the computers at PMU office we need to establish

a Local Area Network (LAN) so that these computers can communicate with in



the client server environment. The Star topology has been implemented to

establish this LAN setup. Each computer (Client as well as Server) is connected

directly to the Ethernet switch through UTP cables. The basic layout of this

topology is shown in the following diagram.

Figure 1 Generic Star Topology of LAN

The cabling and layout for this topology was already configured but

neither the environment nor the server computer existed. Because of which all

desktop as well as laptop computers were working as detached entities. The

sharing of data was not proper and the most important was the security issue.

Every user was logged in and authenticated from its own computer thus no

central control was available. No common computer existed which could act as a

server to serve all the security, authentications and resource management

centrally. Resources, such as common Internet access, domain based email

access, access control policy implementation, were not available in this

scenario.

3. TOPOLOGY COMPONENTS:

To meet all the organizational needs we had to re-configure the existing

topology. Following were the requirements in this regard.



1. Domain Server

2. Domain Registration and Email setup with coordination of Punjab IT

Department

3. High Speed Internet Link (DSL or Cable net)

4. Backup Dialup Connection

5. Accessories

3.1 Domain Server Computer:

To address the major issues Client/ Server environment was established

by using server computer. All client computers then logged in to this server

which validates these clients and provide central management of whole

network. By introducing this Server the LAN topology looks like as depicted in

the following diagram.



The Description of this figure 2 is mentioned in following table

Device Name Device User

Desktop PC1 Receptionist Computer

Desktop PC2 Private secretary to PD

Desktop PC3 Data Entry Operator (Technical)

Desktop PC4 Data Entry Operator (Finance)

Desktop PC5 Stenographer

Desktop PC6 Data Entry Operator (Admn.)

Desktop PC7 Data Entry Operator (MIS)

Laptop 1 Asstt. Director (Monit.)

Laptop 2 Director (MIS)

Laptop3 Director (Technical)

Laptop 4 Director (Finance)

Laptop 5 Deputy Project Director

In this diagram there is an “Added New Services” block shows the

required network objects. There is another Ethernet Switch, shown in this block,

which is required to connect server computer with the present network via

existing Ethernet switch. The server is a domain controller and performs the

following tasks:

• Authenticate the client computers

• Resolve the computer names into IP addresses

• Give controlled access to the users on the network objects (Shared

folders, printers, Internet etc)

• Allocate IP Addresses to the connecting computers

• Provide single shared Internet connection

• Domain based Email access.

• Logs the user’s activities

• Central Data sharing



The logical view, which depicts some of functionalities performed by the

server, is shown in the following diagram.

Figure 3: Logical representation of Domain

Server functionality and LAN Topology

Server Specifications:

We needed both hardware and software to configure this server.



3.1.1 Software:

In general, to configure this server following software packages are

required:

i. Server Based Operating System

ii. Anti Virus

iii. Proxy Server

iv. Firewall/ Access Control List

v. Office tools

vi. Network Management utilities

To specify the actual packages there were two proposals given to the

management for consideration in this regard.

3.1.1.1 Proposal 1 --- Open Source Technologies:

We can configure the required server using open source technologies. The

primary benefit of this option is that all the software packages fall in this

category are free to use and there is no need to purchase any license to

use them at corporate level without violating the software piracy policy &

copy rights. Second advantage is that their development is also open

which gives a chance of development and bug fixing to large number of

developers so the bug fixing is faster as well as the stability and reliability

is more than the software developed by some specific organization with

limited development resources.

In these technologies “Linux Red Hat Advanced Server AS 4.0” was

used. This operating system has built in

i. Proxy server, named as Squid Server, for Single Internet connection

sharing.

ii. Open Office for Word, Excel and Power point applications.

iii. Access control list for Firewall and network traffic control.



iv. Versatile Network management tools are also available in this

operating system.

v. DHCP Server for automatic IP address allocations.

vi. SAMBA server, which integrates Windows XP clients with Linux

Server.

3.1.1.2 Proposal 2 --- Microsoft based Technologies:

We have to purchase the License of each and every product for this setup

implementation. We need to buy

i. MS-Windows 2003 server or MS- Windows 2000 Advanced Server.

ii. MS- Internet Security & Acceleration Server (ISA) 2000 to use the

proxy services.

iii. MS-Office 2003.

iv. Third party network utilities.

Even after spending the cost of ownership of their license the risk of

instability of these products is higher than the Linux Red Hat.

3.1.1.3 Comparison of these Platforms:

Advantages & drawbacks of both proposals are as in the following table.

Open source Platform Microsoft Platform

Free of cost. Need to buy.

Stable and versatile. Risk of failure is higher.

Most of the big organizations are

using them.

Used in small organizations.

As the open source technology

approach is not popular in Pakistan so

its support and expert opinion is rare.

As Microsoft technologies are very

common so experience is easily

available.

Versions up gradation in these

technologies are not completely

different than the previous. So the

New versions can differ greatly from

the existing one so another

certification course may be required



expertise in existing used version the

updated versions can be handled.

to handle newer one in some cases.

Bug fixing is very rapid and stable as

it is developed by large and open

community.

Buy fixing and patching installations

produces some conflicts with the

existing setup.

These technologies are used in the

large environment but these are not

common so expert opinion may not be

available easily in Pakistan.

These setups are used very common

and large numbers of communities in

Pakistan are using them so their

expertise is not a problem.

Future Aspects

As in the current proposed network

topology we will use the services of

Email which will be provided by

Punjab I.T Department. If we want to

setup our own mail server then

“Sendmail” is available in Linux which

can be configured without purchasing

any of its licenses. However SPAM

guard and some security software

packages may be required to

purchase for its smooth and stable

operations.

To configure in house Email Server we

need to purchase MS-Exchange server

2003 and SPAM guard for this mail

server. Its Administration and working

is more time consuming if we need its

complete functionality.

3.1.2 Hardware:

Branded Intel based Pentium IV computer, Dell PowerEdge 2800, was

purchased to install our Domain server whose specifications are mentioned

below.

1. Intel based Pentium dual processors Board



2. Pentium IV Processors

3. 1 Giga Byte RAM

4. 3 x 73 GB SCSI Hard disks

5. Raid Adapter

6. CD- Writer

7. 1.44 MB Floppy

8. 2 x 100/1000 Mbps Ethernet Card

9. VGA Card

10. 17 “ Color monitor

11. Keyboard

12. Mouse

3.2 Domain Registration & Email Setup:

To economize the budget and resources domain

(http://npiw.punjab.gov.pk) was registered with collaboration of Punjab I.T.

department. They provide these facilities by registering our domain

(http://npiw.punjab.gov.pk) and configure POP based Email accounts in their

email server. These accounts are accessible to officers/ officials of PMU through

Internet.

3.2.1 High Speed Internet Connection (DSL/ Cable):

To access Internet we need Internet connection with high bandwidth

(with at least 128 kbs downlink and 64 kbs uplink). This is accomplished

by Digital Subscriber Link (DSL) from NTC.

3.3 Accessories: Following accessories were also configured.

http://npiw.punjab.gov.pk/



Software: Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition version 10:- This software

provides security to existing Windows based clients. This setup can be

configured in Server based mode to manage and control all the securities

centrally. We actually designate any of the windows clients as Symantec

Anti virus server and all other computers will become its clients. If we

update the virus definition on server then it will automatically be updated

on all clients.

Hardware: 1. UPS for Server Computer

2. Heavy duty Electric Wires extension board (5 sockets)

3. 4 Power cables

4. 3 USB Cables with jacks A & B

5. 2x 80 GB Hard disks

6. 2 x 256 MB RAM (Server Compatible)

7. Network interface card

8. 10/100/1000 mbps 3Com Ethernet Switch with 8 ports

9. Mouse pad

10. Multimedia speakers

11. Infrared mouse



PRECAST PARABOLIC LINING (PCPL)

BACKGROUND:

In order to cartail huge water losses from 54000 watercourses of the

Punjab, On Farm Water Management (OFWM) project was initiated during the

year 1976-77. It involved partial brick lining of watercourses alongwith

installation of structures. This project gained wide acceptance from the farming

community owing to its tangible benefits.

Rapid depletion of underground water resources due to excessive pumping

and low rainfalls in the country has threatened agriculture, the back bone of our

economy. Resultantly, on the directions of the President of Pakistan, a program

has been launched to conserve the scare water being lost through seepage from

unlined watercourses, throughout the country. National Programme for

Improvement of Watercourses in Pakistan (Punjab Component) is being

implemented for improvement of 28000 watercourse in irrigated areas and 2000

irrigation schemes in Barani areas. Lining is the most essential component of

watercourse improvement work, aimed to minimize water losses and to enhance

water conveyance efficiency.

1. RATIONALE:

Traditional brick lining with 23 cm thick walls is being practiced since

inception of the OFWM project. In earlier watercourse improvement projects,

availability of construction material at local level coupled with ease in finding

appropriate skilled labour supported brick lining. Consequently, brick lining was

preferred over other techniques. The present scenario is however,

comparatively different that demands for seeking an innovated alternative due

to:-

i. The prices of bricks are increasing continuously.

Mr. Zafar Abbas Deputy Director (Technical)



ii. The available capacity of kiln industry will not suffice to meet the heavy

demand of bricks for construction of 30000 watercourses/irrigation

scheme. More than 2 billion bricks are required per year for the project to

complete the targets. The Government has launched many other

infrastructure development projects, which are consuming a large

quantity of bricks. Private sector development projects are the third

major consumer of bricks.

iii. Continuous rise in demand for bricks has created monopoly of the kiln

owners. There is no price control and the kiln owners demand rates of

their own choice.

iv. Quality of the produce is dwindling day by day. Mineral coal is rarely used

for firing of bricks. Dry bushes, weeds, rice husk and raw wood are used

by most of the brick kilns for the purpose which do not create uniform

heat in the kiln chambers. As a result, outer side of brick, facing towards

fire is over burnt while the opposite side does not fetch enough heat.

v. Twin meanance of water logging & salinity is bringing considerable

damage to cultivable lands in the country. The areas where underground

water is brackish vis-à-vis soils contains injurious salts in abundance, brick

lining denotes deterioration even in early stages. Plaster starts chipping

off, followed by distortion of bricks.

vi. Brick lining requires adequate curing which is not generally practiced by

WUAs.

Under such circumstances, there is need to adopt an innovative approach

in selecting alternate technique for lining to address the multifarious problems

being faced in the field.

The following factors are required to be kept in view while making choice

for a particular type of lining.

• Hydraulic efficiency

• Economic viability

• Durability



• Availability of materials.

• O&M requirements

• Acceptability by the users

In order to overcome the anticipated shortage of good quality bricks in

the wake of unprecedented development projects in the province, Precast

Parabolic Lining (PCPL) could be an alternative option. It is being implemented

successfully in NWFP for the last 7 – 8 years and has been widely accepted by the

WUAs. The purpose of quality assurance vis-à-vis cost and speed of work is being

achieved there.

2. MERITS & DEMERITS:

• PCPL is an emerging technology. Its manufacturing in Punjab is yet to be

established. There is only limited number of manufacturers producing

PCPL segments.

• The quality can be managed as the production is in controlled

environment with very less manufactures.

• Skilled manpower is required which is not so commonly available.

Therefore, project staff has to impart training to the masons.

• Effective supervision is needed on segment lying and jointing.

• The segments can be re-adjusted, in case an error is detected in bed

elevation.

• PCPL is two to three times faster than brick lining.

• Curing is only involved in jointing the PCPL segments.

• PCPL segments are difficult to handle due to their weight and size.

Therefore, transportation is difficult and costly.

• PCPL has limitation for

o Watercourse sections passing through populated area.

o Having less slope.



3. WATERCOURSE DESIGN IN PARAPBOLIC SHAPE:

The consultants have developed computer worksheet/spreadsheet to

make it easier and time saving for preparation of watercourse design. Design

worksheet developed for the purpose is shown as figure 1; and procedure to use

the same is given in the following section.

Procedure to Use Design Worksheet:

• Open “Parabolic-Des” Worksheet.

• Fill watercourse identification information in Part “A”.

• Input Data: In part B, enter the followings:

o Watercourse Section (Main or Branch).

o Watercouse RD (from:to)

o Design Discharge (Q), Manning’s Coefficient (n) and Longitudinal

Slope (S).

• Select the Segment No. (from amongst the segment sizes available as

given in the Table and Press “Ctrl P”.

• Output Data:

o Selected Flow Depth, d.

o Max Allowed Flow Depth, Max d.

o Difference (in the Selected Flow Depth and max Allowed Flow

Depth).

o Free Board, FB.

o Check for FB and decide (if the FB is sufficient, select the Segment

Size and if not, then select the next Segment Size & Press “Ctrl P”.

o Repeat till the FB is sufficient and Segment Size is selected.



Watercourse Section

lpsQ 65.00nS

12345678

389 mm410 mm21 mm91 mm

FB is Sufficient. Select This Segment

Fig. 1

616 0.523 0.002097

1.00

Ratio (m)

1.016

460

920 X 610 920760 X 530 760

cu.m0.065

Size

0.01400.00040

DischargeRoughness CoefficientLongitudinal Slope (m/m)

2.296

No.

R P P_cal

0.412

(m/sec)

A. Identification

0.155 1.016

0.004214Segment No.

d

cfs

70

1144 X 686

(mm) (mm) (sq.m)

389.01 607.66 0.158

70

(m)

Select when "P" and "P_cal" are almost equalt A

1144 686

(m) (P_cal/P)

V

Constant "a"Maximum "d" 410.00

5

390 0.19670

460 0.269 0.003670610 70 540 0.0028830.374

0.004492675 X 480 675 480 70 410 0.216 0.004214640 X 460 640

0.005842600 X 360 600 360 70 290 0.144 0.004000

457 305

Eq. Coefficient (a)

(mm) (sq.m)

Total Depth (D)(mm) (mm)

0.093

Length (m)4500

235

Max. Flow Depth (d)

Flow Area(A)

155

From (RD) 00 0

To (RD)450

Free Board, FBCheck for FB and Decide

70

Segment Size AvailableFree Board

(FB)

70457 X 305

Segment

530

Difference

Punjab Water Management ConsultantsDesign Work Sheet for Parabolic Shaped Watercourse

National Program for Improvement of Watercourses in Pakistan (The Punjab Component)

Max. Allowed Flow Depth, Max. d

0.054 0.006944

Branch

Select Flow Depth, d

(mm x mm) (mm)

Watercourse No.Chak No./ VillageMinor/Disty.Tehsil

B. Design Requirement

Hydraulic Data

Main

Fiscal YearImplementing AgencyField Team/UnitDistrict

SEGMENT NO. 5

INPUT DATA

Select the Segment No. and Press "Ctrl P"

Top Width (T)

360 X 225 360 225

T

D d

t F.BF.B

T

t

d D



4. SPECIFICATIONS:

Concrete:

i. Suggested mix ratio of 1:1:2.

ii. 28 days curing cylinder compressive strength of 4500 psi.

iii. 70% of specified strength after 7 days & 85–90% after 14 days curing.

iv. Maximum 1” slump.

v. Precast only under approved conditions, with compaction by

vibrating table, to be cast in only PWMC approved steel moulds.

vi. Recommended water cemet ration of 0.36.

vii. Minimum 5 days curing (water) or fully covered by steam.

viii. Aggregate sizes vary from minimum 3/8” to maximum of 3/4".

Manufacturer wil adjust proportions of aggregate size to achieve

the specified strength. For Segment No. 1, 2 and 3, maximum

aggregate size recommended is 1/2".

Mortar in Joints (placed at site):

Mortar of 1:3 cemet sand ratio. Cement to be of fine ground quality. Sand

grain size not greater than 0.20 mm (US Sieve 70).

5. EXECUTION OF PCPL ON WATERCOURSES DURING FY 2005-06:

During the year 2005-06, 386 watercourses were improved with PCP

lining, mainly in the districts of Kasur, Bahawalpur, Bahawalnagar, Muzafargarh

and D. G. Khan. The rates for the segments were decided by the concerned

district rate committee (DRACs). In the meantime, considerable reduction in

cost of cement (a major cost component in PCPLs being 80% of material cost)

made it imperative to review and rationalize existing rates. Moreover, the scope

of work attracted various firms that started PCP segment production on



commercial scale locally. In view of the above narrated facts, existing rates

applied by the various districts were monitored and found on higher side.

In order to rationalize the same, Punjab Water management Consultants

(PWMC) were assigned the task of assessment of reasonable rates. On receipt of

report from PWMC, representative of firms fabricating PCP segments, Team

Leader PWMC, DOs (OFWM) Kasur, Bahawalpur, Muzaffargarh, D. G. Khan &

representative of PMU attended a meeting on 23-05-06 in the chairmanship of

DGA (WM) wherein rates were rationalized as given below.

SEGMENT NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

size in inches (14 x 9)

(18 x 12)

(24 x 14)

(24 x 18)

(27 x 19)

(30 x 21)

(36 x 24)

Ex-factory Rate (Rs.) 297 352 420 557 592 781 977

Carriage charges upto 50 Km (Rs.) 44 50 62 87 83 87 182

Carriage charges beyond 50 Km (Rs.) 61 69 85 120 115 120 250

This exercise resulted in brining the rates at reasonable level in all the

districts. It also provided a guideline in deciding rates for this newly adopted

technology.

The detail of watercourses improved with PCPL in various districts is given

as under. OFWM

Sr. District No. of Watercourses

Length lined (km) Total Cost

1 Bahawalpur 69 43.886 44,130,113 2 Bahawalnagar 19 19.588 19,462,830 3 D. G. Khan 158 92.795 94,421,948 4 Muzaffargarh 49 41.425 44,076,506 5 Layyah 5 6.018 5,084,676 6 Bhakkar 6 2.804 2,332,409 7 Mianwali 1 0.41 362,890 8 Multan 2 1.966 1,913,965 9 Lahore 1 1.089 786,378 10 Sheikhupura 2 0.877 701,789



11 Nankana Sahib 12 8.016 7,812,831 12 Kasur 47 31.258 30,722,476 13 Okara 4 3.711 3,033,166 14 Gujranwala 5 2.755 2,479,626

Total 380 256.60 257,321,603

PRSP/NRSP

Sr. District No. of Watercourses

Length lined (km) Total Cost

1 Muzaffargarh 2 2.596 3,307,947 2 Layyah 2 1.777 1,489,290 3 Bahawalpur 2 0.8 855,091

Total 6 5.173 5,652,328

Grand Total (OFWM+PRSP/NRSP) 386 262 262,973,931

Source: PWMC Reports

6. CONCLUSIONS:

i. As PCP lining has been executed mainly in five districts of Punjab during the

year, its impact, advantages, disadvantages and farmers’ response is

required to be studied carefully.

ii. Monitoring of PCP segments’ rate in certain districts revealed that same

were on much higher side. A ban on percent parabolic lining was, therefore,

imposed by the Federal PMU. The rates for these segments were

rationalized by the DGA (WM) and were implemented apart from recovery of

excess amounts; a committee has been constituted to accord permission

only for justified cases where PCPL was in progress.

iii. A committee has also been constituted to examine its technical and

economical aspects apart from evolving strict measures for quality control.

A final decision may therefore be made on the receipt of report from the

said committee.



ACTIVITIES OF THE PROGRAM (PICTORIAL VIEW)

Mr. Ismail Qureshi Federal Secertary Agriculture

& Mr. Nasir Mahmood Khosa, Federal Project Director, During their visit to PMU Lahore

Meeting with PWMC Consultants at PMU Lahore

Assistant Regional Managers’ Conference



Assistant Regional Managers’ Conference

Regional Managers’ Conference

NWFP Delegation visiting PMU Lahore



Dr. Pervez Ahmed Khan, Project Director in a Meeting with WUA

Dr. Pervez Ahmed Khan, Project Director Visiting a Watercourse

Inspection of an Irrigation Scheme in District Chakwal



Farmers’ Gathering at Water User Association Meeting

Earthen Work in-progress

Watercourse Lining in-progress





Nakkas installed at Watercourse



Nakkas Installed at junction

Irrigation Scheme in Barani Area

Pre-cast Parabolic Lining



Improved Watercourse at a Glance





INTRODUCTION OF OFFICERS OF PMU

Project Director Dr. Pervez Ahmed Khan is a career civil servant belonging to District Management Group. He has been educated at prestigious institutes of learning like Cadet College Hassanabdal, & KE Medical College Lahore. He enjoys a vast management & administrative experience ranging from serving as Assistant Commissioner, Additional Deputy Commissioner General & Deputy Secretary in Punjab Civil Secretariat. He has also done his MBA (Marketing) from IBA, Punjab University, Lahore. Before joining PMU, he was serving as Additional Secretary (Health) GoP. Due to his sound academic & professional profile, he was selected for this challenging assignment. He has been serving as Project Director / Additional Secretary to CM since the establishment of PMU in August, 2004.

Director (M&E) Hafiz Muhammad Ilyas joined the PMU in January 2006. He is a PCS officer and was posted as City Magestrate, Traffic Magestrate and Colony Assistant at different stations, i.e. Bahawalnagar, Lodhran, Pakpatan, Multan, and Khanewal. Then he worked as Assistant Commisioner Khanewal, Mian Channo and Chishtian. After the devolution he was posted as DDOC/Secratary TRA Jhang. Then he was promoted to Deputy Secratary and posted as DOC Jhang. He has multiple degrees of M.A. in Islamiat, Political Science and LLB. As Director (M&E) at PMU, he is resposible for monitoring of watercourse improvement progress in all of Punjab. He makes frequent visits to all the districts to monitor and evaluate watercourse improvement.

Director (Finance) Dr. Ijaz Mansoor, an officer of Pakistan Audit and Accounts Service. He is an MBA (Finance) and Masters in Accounting from University of Stockholm. He has represented Pakistan SAI at various international seminars and conferences. The officer has gained vast experience in the fields of Accounting and Auditing through serving the federal & provincial governments and autonomous organizations. Before joining the PMU in October 2006, he has served as Assistant Accountant General (Punjab), Director Finance Shaikh Zayed Hospital Lahore, Director Finance Parks and Horticulture Authority, Director Audit WAPDA and Director Audit Revenue Receipts. As Director Finance, PMU he is responsible for monitoring of all the financial matters of NPIW in Punjab and monitoring of physical activities in Gujranwala region.



Director (MIS) Mr. Hasan Abdullah Khan joined the PMU head office in August 2005. He has done M.Sc. in Physics (1987) from Government College, Lahore and M.S. in Computer Science (1993) from Kent State University, Ohio, U.S. He has over ten years of software development and project management experience in the software industry in the U.S.A. He has developed large scale web based applications in the field of e-commerce, content management systems and online banking systems. At the PMU, he is developing NPIW, Punjab Component website which will have advanced features like direct data entry from the regions and intelligent real time reporting system.

Deputy Director (Technical) Mr. Zafar Abbas belongs to provincial Agriculture Department. He did his B.Sc (Hons.) from University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. He got his Master’s degree in Agriculture Irrigation from the University of California (USA). He joined Water Management Wing of Agriculture Department since its inception and worked on executive positions in various OFWM projects launched throughout the province. He is well experienced in implementation of Water Management techniques for improvement of watercourses. He also got training on “Water Management” from the International Institute of Irrigation, Logan (USA). He joined PMU in October 2004 and is responsible to look after the technical matters.

Deputy Director (Finance) Mr. Ijaz Ahmed Minhas is a career civil servant belonging to PMS, Punjab. Basically he is Sociologist. He did his Masters in Rural Sociology from University of Agriculture, Faisalabad with distinction. He served as Administrator of Auqaf Faisalabad division, Administrative Officer, Punjab Benevolent Fund, Section Officer/Under Secretary and S&GAD. Prior to joining PMU, he was serving as Deputy Secretary in LG&RD Department Government of Punjab. He is also a researcher having publications in journals of international repute. He visits Management & Professional Development Department (MPDD) as guest speaker. He is working as Deputy Director (Finance), PMU, NPIW (PC) since September, 2006. He is performing assignments relating to financial monitoring and monitoring & evaluation of field activities of the program.



Assistant Project Director Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Kharal is a carreer civil servant belonging to provincial management service (PMS). He joined provinicial service on 19-09-99. He has been working in the provincial civil secretariat and autonomous bodies on a variety of assignments ranging from section officer, labor and human resource department, S&GAD, health department and as Assistant Director Education, Punjab Workers Welfare Board. As APD at PMU his role is that of advisor for eight regional offices on administrative matters. Besides his administrative duties he has been disignated as monitoring officer of the head office for Sargodha region responsible for providing information regarding various issues concerning NPIW activities in the said region.

Assistant Director (Admin) Dr. Ahamd Afnan is a career civil servant belonging to PCS (Executive). He did his F.Sc. from Cadet College Hasan Abdal and graduation from Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore. He joined civil service on 03-09-01. He served as DDO(G) and Secretary District Public Safety Commision, Sheikhupura. Then he was appointed as Assistant Director (Inv) Anticorruption, as Assistant Director (Inv) NAB, Punjab and District Monitoring Officer (PESRP) Kasur. He joined the PMU, NPIW on 24-12-2005. His responsibilities at the PMU include admnistration and media management. He also has responsibility of monitoring of Multan Region.

Assistant Director (Technical) Mr. Ahmed Kamal is a career civil servant belonging to Provincial Management Service. Prior to joining PMU, he has worked in Local Government & Rural Development Department & Communication & Works Department, Government of the Punjab Lahore. His three year tenure at LG&RD Department was during the transition to new local government system under PLGO-2001 where he remained actively involved in resolution of various administrative issues that emerged as a result of implementation of devolution plan. He did his BSc. in mathematics & physics from Punjab University & studied for his Masters in Physics from Government College Lahore. He joined PMU in January, 2005 as Assistant Director (Technical) and remained actively involved in preparation of Progress Status Reports / Monitoring Plan etc.

http://npiw.punjab.gov.pk/pg/officers/images/apd.jpg



Assistant Director (M&E) Mr. Tariq Mahmood belongs to Punjab Agriculture Department. He did his B.Sc. in Statistics & Applied Psychology from Punjab University & studied for his Masters in Statistics at Islamia University, Bahawalpur. He started his career as Statistical Investigator at Barani Agricultural Research Institute, Chakwal. After serving there for one year he joined Planning & Evaluation Cell of Agriculture Department in September, 1990 and has been working in various local and foreign funded projects launched throughout the province. He is well experienced in PC-I preparation and monitoring & evaluation of on-going projects. He joined PMU in January 2007 and is engaged in monitoring & evaluation of the NPIW activities in the districts Chakwal, Jehlum, Okara, Sheikhupura and Lahore.

Regional Manager (Bahawalpur) Mr. Ghazi Aman Ullah belongs to district Rahim Yar Khan. After

completing his education, he served as lecturer in Federal

Government’s Sir Syed College Rawalpindi form 1981 to 1989.

Afterwards, he joined Provincial Executive Service and has been

working on different assignments in Provincial Government as EAC,

DO (Cooperative), DDO(R) & Assistant Director (Investigation)

NAB. As such he has a diversified experience of administration. He

joined Program Management Unit in September, 2004.

Regional Manager (D. G. Khan) Mr. Ghulam Yaseen is a PMS Officer. He did his Master’s Degree

from Punjab University, Lahore. He served as section officer in

various Departments e.g. FWF&T department, Industries Mines and

Mineral department, Services and General Administration and Sports

department. He also served as District Monitoring Officer (PESRP)

Layyah. He has joined PMU in January 2007.



Regional Manager (Faisalabad) Muhammad Irshad Hussain Shah has done his Masters in

Chemistry from Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad. He has

previously served in Mianwali, Bhakkar, Jhang, Faisalabad &

Rawalpindi as EAC/Magistrate. Mr. Shah is an officer with rich and

diversified experience on managerial & administrative assignments.

On the basis of his profile he was selected for posting as Regional

Manager Faisalabad where he has been serving since September

2004.

Regional Manager (Gujranawala) Mr. Rai Javed Ahmad before joining provincial executive service in 1988-89 he served as a lecturer in English in Government Islamia College Gujranwala & Government Dial Singh College, Lahore for three years. He has not only served on administrative posts as Extra Assistant Commissioner / DDO (Coordination), Assistant Commissioner but also has the privilege to serve in important policy making & controlling departments such as Finance, Home & Board of Revenue. Before joining the PMU in November, 2004 as RM Gujranwala, he was serving as Assistant Director in Anti Corruption Establishment.

Regional Manager (Lahore) Ahmed Mustjab Karamat initially served in merchant navy form

1984 to 1988. He did his Bachelor in Law from Punjab University.

He also holds a masters degree in arts from Punjab University. Later

on, he joined provincial executive service as EAC/Magistrate in

1992. He has been serving in various parts of the province in that

capacity. He also remained associated with NAB as investigation

officer. He is a widely traveled person having the privilege to visit

more than 25 countries across the globe.



Regional Manager (Multan) Mr. Muhammad Amin Chaudhary belongs to district Khanewal.

He joined the Provincial Executive Service in 1986. To his credit are

number of assignments relating to administration and management

mostly at district & tehsil level. He has also worked as District Food

Officer and Assistant Director Anticorruption. He is very good at

numbers being a B.Sc in mathematics & physics. He joined Program

Management Unit in October, 2004.

Regional Manager (Rawalpindi) Mr. Abdur Rasheed Razi joined service as a PCS (Executive)

officer in 1987. He has served as EAC / Magistrate in Rawalpindi,

Gujar Khan & Chakwal and remained working with Food

Department as District Food Controller from April 1998 to July

2004. As such he has vast experience of administration. He joined

PMU in August, 2004 as Regional Manager Rawalpindi.

Regional Manager (Sargodha) Mr. Ubaid Ullah Sial belongs to the Provincial Executive Service.

He is Masters in English as well in Islamic Studies. He started his

career as lecturer but later on chose to serve the province as an

administrator. In a career spread over 30 years he has been serving

the Government of the Punjab on various positions viz. Extra

Assistant Commissioner, District Food Controller, Assistant

Commissioner & DDO(R). He joined PMU as Regional Manager

Sargodha in August, 2004.

NATIONAL PROGRAM FOR IMPROVEMENT OF WATERCOURSES

(PUNJAB COMPONENT)

Program Management Unit, CHIEF MINISTER SECRETARIATE,

41-A, Lawrance Road, Lahore. Ph: +92 42 6271249-50

http:.npiw.punjab.gov.pk

National Program for Improvement of Watercourses (Punjab Component)

Annual Report FY-2005-06.pdf

Documents

Transcript of Annual Report FY-2005-06.pdf