Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Signaling Does Not Modulate Atherogenesis in Mice
Animal–plant–microbe interactions: direct and indirect effects of swan foraging behaviour...
Transcript of Animal–plant–microbe interactions: direct and indirect effects of swan foraging behaviour...
Abstract Wetlands are among the most important
ecosystems on Earth both in terms of productivity and
biodiversity, but also as a source of the greenhouse gas
CH4. Microbial processes catalyzing nutrient recycling
and CH4 production are controlled by sediment phys-
ico-chemistry, which is in turn affected by plant activity
and the foraging behaviour of herbivores. We per-
formed field and laboratory experiments to evaluate
the direct effect of herbivores on soil microbial activity
and their indirect effects as the consequence of
reduced macrophyte density, using migratory Bewick’s
swans (Cygnus columbianus bewickii Yarrell) feeding
on fennel pondweed (Potamogeton pectinatus L.) tu-
bers as a model system. A controlled foraging experi-
ment using field enclosures indicated that swan
bioturbation decreases CH4 production, through a de-
crease in the activity of methanogenic Archaea and an
increased rate of CH4 oxidation in the bioturbated
sediment. We also found a positive correlation be-
tween tuber density (a surrogate of plant density dur-
ing the previous growth season) and CH4 production
activity. A laboratory experiment showed that sedi-
ment sterilization enhances pondweed growth, proba-
bly due to elimination of the negative effects of
microbial activity on plant growth. In summary, the
bioturbation caused by swan grazing modulates CH4
cycling by means of both direct and indirect (i.e. plant-
mediated) effects with potential consequences for CH4
emission from wetland systems.
Keywords Multitrophic interactions Æ Methane
cycling Æ Shallow lakes Æ Bewick’s swans Æ Fennel
pondweed
1 Introduction
Wetlands are among the most productive ecosystems
on Earth, mainly due to the rapid recycling of nutri-
ents mediated by the hydrological regime and the
coupled activity of water and soil bacteria (Mitsch
and Gosselink 2000). Wetlands are also among the
most prominent sources of atmospheric CH4, con-
tributing 55% to the annual global CH4 emission to
the atmosphere (Houghton et al. 2001; LeMer and
Communicated by Christian Korner
Electronic supplementary material Supplementary material isavailable in the online version of this article athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0445-9 and is accessible for authorized users.
P. L. E. Bodelier (&) Æ M. Stomp Æ H. J. LaanbroekDepartment of Microbial Wetland Ecology,Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW),Centre for Limnology, Rijksstraatweg 6,3631AC, Nieuwersluis, The Netherlandse-mail: [email protected]
M. StompAquatic Microbiology, Institute for Biodiversityand Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam,Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018 WS Amsterdam,The Netherlands
L. Santamaria Æ M. KlaassenDepartment of Plant–Animal Interactions,Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW),Centre for Limnology, Rijksstraatweg 6,3631AC, Nieuwersluis, The Netherlands
L. SantamariaMediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies(IMEDEA, CSIC-UIB), Miquel Marques 21,07190, Esporles, Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain
Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244
DOI 10.1007/s00442-006-0445-9
123
PLANT ANIMAL INTERACTIONS
Animal–plant–microbe interactions: direct and indirect effectsof swan foraging behaviour modulate methane cyclingin temperate shallow wetlands
Paul L. E. Bodelier Æ Maayke Stomp ÆLuis Santamaria Æ Marcel Klaassen ÆHendrikus J. Laanbroek
Received: 14 September 2005 / Accepted: 26 April 2006 / Published online: 31 May 2006� Springer-Verlag 2006
Roger 2001; Segers 1998). Both productivity and CH4
emission are facilitated by the simultaneous action of
aerobic as well as anaerobic microbes in the many
oxic–anoxic interfaces in wetlands. The latter are
created by wetland plants which introduce oxygen
into the sediments by radial oxygen loss (cf. Bodelier
2003) thereby influencing rhizosphere microbes di-
rectly. The direct facilitation of microbial activity in
the rhizosphere, mobilizes nutrients and renders them
available to the plants thereby enhancing plant pro-
ductivity (Bodelier et al. 1996; Caffrey and Kemp
1991; Christensen et al. 1994; Karjalainen et al. 2001;
Pedersen et al. 1995; Risgaard-Petersen and Jensen
1997). The enhanced oxidation of NH3 to NO3– in the
rhizosphere of submerged macrophytes (e.g. Ottosen
et al. 1999; Risgaard-Petersen and Jensen 1997),
which is of potential benefit for the plants since it
enhances the supply of N in a form preferred by the
plants, is a good example of the latter.
Since the emission of CH4 is the outcome of the
anoxic production by methanogenic microbes (in part
driven by organic C availability) and the aerobic con-
sumption by methanotrophic bacteria, aquatic macro-
phytes play a significant role in the cycling and
emission of CH4 from wetland ecosystems (Boon and
Mitchell 1995; Heilman and Carlton 2001; Kankaala
and Bergstrom 2004; Sorrell et al. 2002). The previ-
ously mentioned NH3-oxidizing bacteria also have the
ability to consume CH4 (Bodelier and Frenzel 1999)
and have to be taken into account when assessing CH4
cycling in rhizospheres of macrophytes.
Considering the above, herbivores such as ducks and
swans can influence CH4-cycling microbes in a direct
and an indirect way. Grubbing activity of waterfowl
results in spatial and temporal oxygenation of the
sediment thereby directly affecting CH4-consuming
bacteria by providing these obligatory aerobic
microbes with oxygen they need and exposing the
obligatory anaerobic CH4-producing microbes to
harmful habitat conditions. Swans foraging on macro-
phyte tubers may cause bioturbation down to 30 cm
according to the burial depth of the tubers (Santamaria
and Rodriguez-Girones 2002). As already discussed
above waterfowl can thus create oxic/anoxic interfaces
analogous to the roots of macrophytes with similar
impact on sediment microbes. Besides bioturbation
waterfowl can also influence microbial activity directly
by nutrient input via faeces, with possible feedbacks to
vegetation (Bazely and Jefferies 1989; Walker et al.
2003). Grazing by herbivores such as ducks and swans,
is likely to modulate the effects of macrophytes on
CH4-cycling microbes and hence on CH4 emission
from wetland ecosystems, in an indirect way. Grazing
by waterfowl may have severe effects on macrophyte
density (Idestam-Almquist 1998; Santamaria and
Rodriguez-Girones 2002; Sondergaard et al. 1997),
thereby potentially reducing the rhizosphere effect on
sediment microbes as discussed above.
Despite their potential importance, the direct
effects of herbivores and the indirect effects of plant–
herbivore interactions on sediment microorganisms
have received very limited attention, particularly in
aquatic ecosystems. In this study we perform field and
laboratory experiments to evaluate the direct effect of
grubbing activities of herbivorous swans on microbial
activity, and their indirect effects as the result of
herbivore-mediated differences in root density. We
hypothesize that direct effects by bioturbation will
stimulate aerobic while hampering anaerobic
microbes. Indirect effects through reduction of the
rhizosphere effect will reduce all microbial activity.
To test these hypotheses, we manipulated swan
grazing pressure in the field and studied its effects on
sediment physico-chemistry and microbiology. In
addition, a laboratory experiment was used to address
plant-mediated, indirect effects of herbivory on soil
microbiology, mediated by a reduction in plant den-
sity. We pay specific attention to CH4 cycling, both
because this is a process of particular importance in
wetlands and shallow lakes, and because it is likely to
be among the most affected by the herbivores and
plants under study.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study system
The study was performed in the Lauwersmeer
(53�22¢N, 06�13¢E), a shallow freshwater lake
(2,000 ha, of which 750 ha is < 70 cm deep) that
represents one of the most important stopovers of
Bewick’s swans during their autumn migration. The
submerged vegetation that covers its extensive shal-
low areas is dominated by fennel pondweed , a
pseudo-annual angiosperm that survives the winter
by means of asexual propagules (below-ground tu-
bers). Bewick’s swans (Cygnus columbianus bewickii
Yarrell) migrate annually between their breeding
grounds in the Pechora Delta (northern Russia) and
their wintering sites in the Netherlands and the UK
(Beekman et al. 2002). During migration, the swans
make several stopovers in which they feed exten-
sively on the starch-rich, subsurface tubers of Pota-
mogeton pectinatus L. (fennel pondweed). Swans
start feeding on the tubers immediately after their
234 Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244
123
arrival in early October and abandon the lake to
continue their migration or to feed in nearby crops
and grasslands by mid-to-late November.
2.2 Field experiment: direct effects of foraging
swans on microbial processes
Since flocks of foraging Bewick’s swans remain in their
pondweed foraging areas around the clock, progres-
sively exploiting the tuber banks, it is difficult to
measure grubbing effects directly in the field without
disturbing the whole flock or leaving considerable time
between the observations made before and after swan
foraging. For this reason, we decided to cage six cap-
tive animals in an enclosure built in a pondweed field
exploited regularly by swans, which allowed for sam-
pling both immediately before and after the swans’
foraging bout.
The experiment took place during November 2000
in the Nieuwe Robbegat, a protected area within the
Lauwersmeer that is closed to the public and where
hunting is prohibited. A cage (10·10 m, 2 m high,
made of fishing net) was installed in September, before
arrival of the Bewick’s swans to the area. The cage was
made of 13 heavy wooden stakes connected with steel
cables to which the fishing nets were fastened. On
November 15, immediately after the Bewick’s swans’
departure from the foraging area, the plot was sampled
using two different sampling grids covering the com-
plete 10·10 m area equally spaced as displayed in
Fig. 1. To determine the density of fennel pondweed
tubers 25 cores (30 cm length, 10 cm diameter) were
taken. Nine equally spaced (see Fig. 1) cores (20 cm
length, 3.8 cm diameter) were used to for microbio-
logical parameters and sediment physico-chemistry
(see Supplement S1). Subsequently, six Bewick’s swans
were placed inside the enclosure and were allowed to
forage while being observed from a boat at approxi-
mately 150 m distance. The six swans that were re-
leased in this cage originated from the wild but had
been kept in captivity prior to the experiment for
several years. Their behaviour appeared very natural
(Nolet et al. 2002). The treatment resulted in a net
feeding time (i.e. time that the swans had their heads
under water) over the enclosed area of 12.0 foraging
swan hours. The choice of the number of swans used
was based on observations on free-living swans in the
Lauwersmeer area (Nolet et al. 2001). The grazing
pressure observed in the cage is in the same range as
observed in the field (Nolet 2004; Nolet et al. 2001).
Subsequently, swans were removed from the enclosure
on 17 November and cores for tuber and soil samples
were taken again in the plot (as above).
2.3 Grazing pressure
All cores were stored outdoors in a cooling box until 20
November, then transported to the laboratory for
processing. To estimate tuber bank biomass, the sedi-
ment sampled in the cores was washed through a 3-mm
sieve. Tubers were then separated, counted and
weighed individually [fresh weight (f.w.), accuracy
0.001 g], as described by (Nolet et al. 2001). Although
both (i.e. tuber and sediment) sampling grids differed
in grid size and number of nodes (see Fig. 1), they
coincided in the specific locations where sediment
cores were sampled. Since there were more cores
measuring tuber density than those sampled to mea-
sure microbial activity and soil chemistry, grazing
pressure at the different sediment-sampling points was
estimated as the difference in the average number of
tubers (before minus after grazing) using the from six
to nine ‘‘grazing pressure’’ cores in the immediate
vicinity of each ‘‘microbial’’ core. This resulted in a
running window of grazing pressure estimation, single
grazing pressure cores being used in from one to three
grazing pressure estimates at the ‘‘microbial’’ core
location.
2.4 Microbiological activity
Sediment sampled in the cores was sieved ( < 2 mm),
thoroughly mixed, separated into sub-samples (for
10m
10m
Tuber sampling point “Microbial” sampling point
Fig. 1 Schematic presentation of the experimental plot withsampling grids for tuber density analyses (grey circles) andmicrobial and sediment physico-chemical analyses (black squares )
Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244 235
123
microbial incubations and physico-chemical measure-
ments) and incubated immediately for the microbial
activity measurements.
2.4.1 Potential CH4 production
Potential CH4 production (PMP) was determined as
described by (Bodelier et al. 2000a). Ten grams of
sediment was transferred to 150-ml flasks and 10 ml
sterile demineralised water was added. The deminer-
alised water had been deoxygenated with N2 prior to
addition. The flasks were closed with rubber stoppers
and the residual CH4 and O2 was removed by flushing
with N2 for 30 min. The flasks were incubated statically
in the dark. CH4 accumulation in the headspace was
monitored by GC analysis. The CH4 production po-
tential was calculated using the linear regression
coefficient of the linear part of the CH4 increase curve.
2.4.2 Potential CH4 oxidation
The potential CH4 oxidation (PMO) activity of the
sediment was determined as described by Bodelier and
Frenzel (1999). In short, 10 g sediment was transferred
to 150-ml flasks and diluted 1:1 (w/v) with sterile
demineralised water. The flasks were closed with rub-
ber stoppers and 1.3 ml pure CH4 (10,000 p.p.m.v.) was
added. The flasks were incubated on a shaker
(150 r.p.m.) at 20�C. The decrease in CH4 in the
headspace was monitored by GC analysis of regularly
taken sub-samples. Since CH4 depletion curves typi-
cally display bi-phasic kinetics, an initial PMO
(PMOini) and an induced PMO (PMOind) depletion
rate can be distinguished. PMOini indicates active
methanotrophic biomass in the field, whereas the
PMOind is a measure for total methanotrophic abun-
dance in the sample (i.e. including bacteria that were
not active in situ) (Gilbert and Frenzel 1998). The
PMO rates (initial and induced) were calculated using
the slope of the regression analyses on the linear parts
of the CH4 depletion curves.
2.4.3 Potential NH4+ oxidation activity
Potential NH4+ oxidation (PAO) was determined as
described by Bodelier and Frenzel (1999). In short,
10 g sediment was transferred to 150-ml flasks covered
with aluminium foil. Twenty microlitres of PNA med-
ium [0.33 g (NH4)2SO4, 0.14 g K2HPO4, 0.027 g
KH2PO4 per l] was added. The flasks were incubated at
20�C on a shaker at 150 r.p.m. The oxidation of NH4+
was monitored by taking three samples (1 ml) of the
mixture in the first 6 h followed by 14 samples spread
evenly over the following 7 days. The samples were
centrifuged at 13,000 r.p.m. for 10 min and the super-
natant stored at –20�C for analyses of NO3–/NO2
– con-
centrations. The PAO rates were calculated using the
slope of the linear regression analyses on the NO3– and
NO2– increase curves.
2.5 Sediment physico-chemistry
Sediments subsamples used for physico-chemical
measurements were dried at 40�C and analysed to
measure pH (extracted in water and in CaCl2),
%CaCO3, %organic matter, total N, total and avail-
able P, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Fe3+, Cl-, SO42–, NH4
+, NO3– and
conductivity (all according to Troelstra et al. 1995).
Separate subsamples were used to determine water
content (weight loss of 5-g sediment samples dried at
105�C for 24 h).
2.6 Laboratory experiment: indirect effects
of foraging swans on microbiological processes
2.6.1 Experimental design and plant cultivation
The experiment aimed at determining the effect of
plant density on microbial activity rates and the po-
tential effects of the latter (mediated by changes in
sediment chemistry) on plant growth. Plants were
grown in beakers from tubers originally collected in the
Lauwersmeer. Sixteen treatments were used, resulting
from a factorial combination of sediment type (sandy
vs. clay rich), sediment microbiota (control vs. sterile
sediment) and planting densities (0, 1, 3 and 6 plants/
beaker, i.e. including a control without plants). For
every treatment six replicate beakers were used. Plant
densities correspond to the variation in tuber densities
observed in the field as a result of varying grazing
intensities.
Pondweed tubers used in the experiment were ob-
tained from the institute’s tuber stock. They belonged
to six different clonal lines originally collected in the
Lauwersmeer (Hangelbroek et al. 2002), one of each
being used for each replicate aquarium (i.e. integrating
random factors aquarium and clone in a single factor).
Individual tuber mass was standardised to a relatively
narrow range (0.040–0.125 g f.w.). Tubers were sur-
face-sterilised [5 min in NaHClO3 (5%) followed by
thorough rinsing in sterilised water (Bodelier et al.
1997)] and pre-sprouted for 6 days in microtiter trays
filled with clean sand and water. Sprouted tubers were
randomly assigned to beakers and planted in plastic
236 Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244
123
beakers (700 ml volume, 14.4 cm height, 8.9 cm upper
diameter, 6.5 cm lower diameter) filled with approxi-
mately 535 ml sediment. Sandy and clay-rich sediment
were obtained from swan foraging fields at the Lauw-
ersmeer (near Nieuwe Robbengat and Zoutkamp,
respectively) after the swans had left the foraging
areas. Tubers, stones and other large particles were
removed using a 2-mm sieve [for a description of sed-
iment granulometry at those sites, see Nolet et al.
(2001)]. Sterile sediment was obtained by autoclaving
wet sediment samples twice (1 h at 121�C, on 2 sub-
sequent days). In all cases, sediment was placed in the
pots and covered with a layer of sterile aquarium sand
to minimize siltation and nutrient release to the water
column.
Per treatment two replicate beakers were placed in
each of six separate aquaria, this made a total of six
repeated-measures replicates (i.e. treatments and their
interactions were fully nested within each random
factor aquarium). The experiment was labour inten-
sive; hence, replicates were not grown simultaneously
but in a ‘‘ladder’’ design (i.e. we initiated two repli-
cates every fortnight). Each aquaria had a separated
water pump (Eheim Aqua Boss) for mixing and aer-
ation. The aquaria were filled with tap water and
placed in a growth chamber (water temperature 22�C,
day length 16 h, irradiance 150 lmol photons m–2 s–1
at 1 cm under the water surface). Water loss due to
evaporation was compensated for by adding demin-
eralized water. Plants were grown for 6 weeks before
harvesting for plant biomass determination, sediment
microbiological assays and sediment physico-chemistry
measurements.
2.7 Pre-harvest analyses
2.7.1 Plant growth rates
Plant height (length of the longest shoot including the
terminal leaf, to the nearest tip in mm) was measured
weekly and used to obtain non-destructive estimates of
the relative growth rate (RGR; obtained from logistic
regression fits).
2.7.2 Pore water physico-chemistry
Pore water was sampled at weekly intervals in four out
of six aquaria, by means of Rhizon soil solution sam-
plers (Eijkelkamp, the Netherlands) connected to
Venoject blood collecting tubes as described by Bo-
delier et al. (1997). Pore water samples taken during
the experiment were analysed for CO2, CH4, HCO3–,
NH4+, NO–
3 and NO–2 concentrations and pH. HCO3
–
content was determined by titration with HCl. CO2 and
CH4 concentrations in the headspace of the tubes were
determined according to Bodelier and Frenzel (1999),
after which tubes were frozen (–20�C) for further
analyses. Following careful thawing, NH4+, NO3
– and
NO2– were measured using a Technicon Traacs 800
auto-analyser (Technicon Instruments, Tarrytown,
N.Y.).
2.8 Post-harvest analyses
2.8.1 Harvesting procedure
The harvest of six aquaria was carried out in a period
of 6 weeks. Every 2 weeks, two aquaria, containing
two replicate beakers of every treatment, were har-
vested. We removed the aboveground plant parts and
the cover of aquarium sand from every beaker and
transferred the sediment (including plant roots and
rhizomes) to a glass beaker filled with 600 ml auto-
claved and N2-deoxygenated demineralised water.
Agitation for 10 min with a magnetic stirrer was used
to produce a soft slurry, from which the roots were
carefully picked out. Roots and sediment slurries were
used immediately for separate analyses of most
microbiological and physico-chemical variables, while
sub-samples, used to estimate the numbers of CH4- and
NH3-oxidizing bacteria, were stored at 8�C until fur-
ther analyses (usually the next day).
2.8.2 Plant biomass
Aboveground parts (shoots+leaves), roots+rhizomes
and tubers were dried (for 48 h at 70�C) to determine
their respective dry weights.
2.9 Microbiological analyses
2.9.1 PMO of sediment and roots
The PMO activity of the sediment (PMOsediment) was
determined as described above for the field experiment
using 20 g slurry (as described in the harvest procedure
section). The PMO associated with roots (PMOroots)
was determined as follows: 0.3 g root material was
transferred to 12-ml tubes with butyl rubber stoppers
and 120 ll pure CH4 (10,000 p.p.m.v.) was added. The
tubes were incubated in the dark. The concentration of
CH4 in the headspace was monitored twice a day for 8–
9 days by GC analysis. Before removing 100 ll air
from the headspace, 100 ll air was injected to keep the
Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244 237
123
pressure stable. After 6 days 1 ml O2 was added. After
incubation the dry weight of the roots was determined
by drying them at 70�C for 48 h.
2.9.2 PAOsediment and PAOroots
PAOsediment was determined as described for the
field experiment using 20 g slurry. The PAOroots was
determined by transferring 0.3 g root material to 150-
ml flasks covered with aluminium foil. The roots were
incubated with 25 ml PNA medium after which the
same procedure was followed as with the sediment
slurries.
2.9.3 Potential CH4 production of sediment and roots
Potential CH4 production of the sediment (PMPsedi-
ment) was determined as described for the field
experiment using 60 g slurry. The PMP associated with
roots (PMProots)was determined by transferring 0.3 g
root material to 12-ml tubes and flushing them with N2.
The concentration of CH4 in the headspace was mon-
itored twice a day for 8–9 days by GC analysis. Before
removing 100 ll air from the headspace, 100 ll N2 was
injected to keep the pressure stable.
2.9.4 Numbers of CH4 oxidizers in sediment and
associated with roots
The number of CH4 oxidizers (NMO) was determined
by means of the most probable number (MPN) method
according to (Bodelier and Frenzel 1999). In order to
extract the cells from the sediment particles, 10 g slurry
was diluted 1:5 with phosphate buffer saline (PBS). For
the roots, 50 ml PBS was added to 1 g roots. Glass
beads (3 mm, 10 g) were added to both extracts of
sediment and roots. The extracts were shaken for 4 h at
150 r.p.m. and subsequently diluted 1:10 with PBS. A
sub sample of 100 ll of the suspension was serially
diluted 1:1 in sterile microtiter plates (Nunc, Denmark)
containing growth medium for methanotrophs (NMS).
The plates were incubated for 4 weeks at 25�C in gas-
tight jars containing 20% CH4 in air. Inoculated plates
without CH4 served as controls. Wells that were turbid
were considered positive. MPNs were obtained from
statistical tables (Rowe et al. 1977).
2.9.5 Numbers of NH4+ oxidizers in sediment and
associated with roots
The numbers of NH3 oxidizers (NAO) was determined
by the MPN method as described by Bodelier and
Frenzel (1999). The same sediment and root extracts
were used as described for the determination of the
numbers of CH4 oxidizers. A sub sample of 1 ml of the
suspension was serially diluted 1:3.25 in sterile micro-
titer plates (Nunc) containing growth medium for
NH3-oxidizing bacteria (Bodelier and Frenzel 1999).
After an incubation period of 2 months in the dark at
25�C, NH4+ oxidation was scored in each well by
checking for the presence of NO2– and NO3
– by adding
Griess Ilosvay reagents (Spektroquant test, Merck,
Darmstadt) and Zinc powder. MPNs were obtained
from statistical tables (Rowe et al. 1977).
2.10 Sediment physico-chemistry
Sediment-slurry subsamples used for physico-chemical
measurements were dried at 40�C and analysed as
described in the field experiment section on sediment
physico-chemistry.
2.11 Gas analyses
CH4 in headspace samples was analysed using a
HP5340 GC equipped with a flame ionization detector.
He was used as the carrier gas, synthetic air and H2 as
burning gases. The oven temperature was 80�C. Cali-
bration was performed using standard gas mixtures.
CO2 was measured also with a HP5340 GC, equipped
with a thermal conductivity detector. He was used
as the carrier gas, oven temperature was 50�C and
the calibration was performed using a standard gas
mixture.
2.12 Statistical analyses
2.12.1 Field observations
To simplify the analysis and avoid problems of
redundancy and multi-colinearity (arising from the use
of multiple, non-independent and sometimes highly
correlated variables), we reduced all sediment and
pore water variables to the first two to three axes ex-
tracted by a principal components analyses (PCA). The
number of PCA axes used as independent variables in
the multiple regressions discussed below was chosen
based of the proportion of variance explained by each
axis (up to a threshold of 12%, at which the cumulative
percentage of explained variance started to level off).
We performed two different analyses.
First, we estimated the relative change in microbial
activity as (before–after)/before (n=9) and fitted it to
a multiple regression model with grazing pressure
238 Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244
123
[=relative change in tuberbank biomass, in g f.w. m–2,
estimated as (before–after)/before; n=9] and relative
change in sediment physico-chemistry [=first and sec-
ond axes of a PCA based on the relative change in the
physico-chemical variables from before to after graz-
ing, estimated as (before–after)/before; n=9 for each
variable] as independent variables. With this approach,
changes in microbial activity are directly linked to
grazing pressure and changes in sediment chemistry,
and the differences are independent of the spatial
structure on which they are over imposed (under the
assumption that over the 2-day period, the only factor
potentially causing differences in soil microbiology and
physico-chemistry was the experimentally imposed
swan grazing).
Second, we used the initial values (n=9) of microbial
activity to make a multiple regression on the initial
values of tuber density and sediment physico-chemistry
(using the first three axis of a PCA of all sedi-
ment+pore water variables). The purpose was to assess
whether a surrogate of plant density during the growth
season (i.e. tuber density) was correlated with micro-
bial activity in the sediment, after accounting for the
effect of soil heterogeneity in physico-chemical com-
position.
2.13 Laboratory experiment
All variables were compared by means of ANOVAs,
with all fixed factors (sediment type, sterilization, tuber
density and their second- and third-order interactions)
nested within the random factor ‘‘aquarium’’ (=clone,
since each clone was in a different aquarium). In these
ANOVAs, all sediment and pore water variables were
reduced to the first two axes of a PCA (for the same
reason as mentioned above). Data were log-trans-
formed to assure homoscedasticity and normality of
residuals whenever necessary. All statistical tests were
performed using STATISTICA 6.0 for Windows
(Tulsa, Okla.).
3 Results
3.1 Field experiment
Swan grazing resulted in a 9% decrease in average
tuber-bank biomass, from 71.0 to 64.6 g f.w. m–2
which is in the range of foraging yields observed for
free-living swans in the same area (Nolet 2004).
However, due to the strong small-scale spatial vari-
ation in grazing pressure, swan consumption varied
within the plot from zero to 62% of the tuber-bank
biomass removed. Grazing pressure had direct effects
on PMP and PMOini: results of the multiple
regression indicate that grazing pressure affected
PMP significantly and negatively, and PMOini posi-
tively and marginally significantly (Table 1; Fig. 2),
and had no effect on PMOind and PAO. In addition,
there were significant effects of sediment physico-
chemistry on PMP (i.e. a positive correlation with
PCA axis 1, indicating negative correlations with
conductivity, Cl, Na, K and organic matter). The
effect of grazing pressure on PMP is, however, not
attributable to an indirect effect, mediated by chan-
ges in sediment physico-chemistry: separate regres-
sions indicated that axis 1 of sediment physico-
chemistry was not significantly correlated with graz-
ing pressure [axis 1: F(1,7)=0.47, P=0.51], although
the effect of axis 2 was marginally significant
[F(1,7)=4.33, P=0.076; intercept=0.129±0.560, slope=
1.859±0.893].
Tuber density had a marginally significant, positive
effect on PMOind, and no effect on PMOini, PMP, or
Table 1 Results of the multiple regression analyses withbackwards removal of variables, for the effect of burrowingswans and sediment physico-chemistry on the microbial activity
in the sediment of the Lauwersmeer. PMOini Initial potentialCH4-oxidizing activity, PMP potential CH4-producing activity,NS not significant
Intercept Grazing pressure (%) Sediment physico-chemistry Adjusted R2
PCA axis 1a PCA axis 2b
PMOini Estimate±SE 0.047±0.094 0.302±0.150 0.28t (7) 2.01c
PMP Estimate±SE 0.066±0.144 –0.849±0.306 0.172±0.066 0.180±0.098 0.50t (5) –2.77* 2.60* 1.83 NS
*P < 0.05aVariables with loadings >0.7 were organic matter, Na, K, conductivity, Cl, all (–)bVariables with loadings >0.7 were total P, Mg, both (+)cP < 0.10
Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244 239
123
PAO (Table 2). PMP showed a significant correlation
with sediment physico-chemistry, through a positive
correlation with PCA axis 2 (i.e. with conductivity, K
and Mg). Indirect effects of swan grazing, mediated by
a reduction in tuber production, are thus most likely to
affect PMOind.
3.2 Laboratory experiment
PMProots, PAOroots and numbers of NH4+ oxidizers in
the sediment and on roots were undetectable, thus they
were not included in the statistical analyses. Plant
density had significant effects on PMOsediment and
PMOroots (Supplement S2), but did not influence
NMO or PAO. The effect on PMO was, however,
opposite to that found in the field. PMOroots de-
creased with plant density and, while PMOsediment
increased with plant density in sandy sediment, it de-
creased with plant density in clay-rich sediment
(Fig. 3). In the absence of plants, PMOsediment did
not differ between sediment types.
PMP showed a strong heteroscedasticity, largely
caused by the predominance of non-detectable activi-
ties in sandy sediment. In clay-rich sediment, higher
activities were measured; non-parametric analyses
using Friedman ANOVA indicated a marginally sig-
nificant increase in PMP activity when plants were
present, as compared to the treatment without plants
(ANOVA v2=7.20, df=3, P=0.066; n=6).
Plant growth was significantly affected by sediment
microbial activity. Sediment sterilization resulted in
increased biomass yield (total dry weight) and shoot
length, while plant RGR and shoot-to-root ratio de-
creased (Supplement S2; Fig. 4). Concerning sediment
chemistry, tuber density had a significant effect on axis
1 (i.e. a negative correlation with conductivity, inor-
ganic anions and cations, organic matter, total N and P
in the sediment), which showed much larger scores for
the two highest tuber densities. These results are con-
sistent with the depletion of nutrients and ions related
to plant growth. Sediment type and sterilization had
significant and marginally significant effects on axis 2,
respectively (mainly representing pore water variables;
-1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8-0.6
-0.3
0.0
0.3
0.6
-0.8
-0.4
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
Grazing pressure
Rel
ativ
e C
hang
e in
PM
OR
elat
ive
Cha
nge
in P
PMO
MP
PMP
Fig. 2 Effect of swan grazing pressure on the potential activityof CH4-producing Archaea (potential CH4 production; PMP)(upper graph) and CH4-oxidizing bacteria (potential CH4-oxidizing activity; PMO) (lower graph). Upper graph Partialresidual plot derived from a multiple regression model, lowergraph standard regression fit
Table 2 Results of the multiple regression analyses withbackwards removal of variables, to determine the effect oftuber density and soil physico-chemistry on the rates of bacterial
activity measured before swan grazing. Only significant effectsare shown. For abbreviations, see Table 1
Intercept Tuber density Sediment physico-chemistry Adjusted R2
PCA axis 1a PCA axis 2b PCA axis 3c
PMOind Estimate±SE 83.59±8.36 0.23±0.11 0.31t (7) 2.14d
PMP Estimate±SE 1.97±0.14 –0.26±0.07 0.63t (7) –3.84**
**P < 0.01aVariables with loadings >0.7 were SO4 (–0.92), total N (0.91), total P (0.89), Cl (–0.72) and pHH2O (–0.82)bVariables with loadings >0.7 were K (0.91), Mg (0.84) and conductivity (0.82)cVariables with loadings >0.7 were pHCaCl2
(–0.68), CaCO3 (–0.61)dP < 0.10
240 Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244
123
Supplement S2). N and NH4+ concentrations in the pore
water were higher, and CO2 lower in sterile sediment.
CH4 was undetectable in the porewater during the
whole experiment.
4 Discussion
The bioturbation caused by swan grubbing as tested in
the field experiment (i.e. direct effects) seemed to have
little bearing on NH3 oxidation, yet it modulated CH4
cycling microbiological processes through a combina-
tion of effects, with possible consequences for CH4
emission from the studied shallow lake ecosystem. The
direct effect of grubbing was a decrease in the activity
of methanogenic Archaea and an increase in the rate of
CH4 oxidation in the bioturbated sediment, which
confirms our hypotheses with respect to the expected
direct effects. Obviously, this would result in a net
reduction of CH4 emission from the lake under study.
However, theoretically swan grazing may release CH4
that is trapped in the sediment, which may compensate
for the emission reduction as the consequence of the
microbiological processes which are affected.
Although the field experiment was designed to test
the direct effects of bioturbation, tuber density at time
of sampling is regarded as a surrogate for plant density
in the previous growing season and hence also with
respect to the indirect (plant density) effects conclu-
sions can be drawn from the field trial. Interestingly,
swan grazing resulted in a (marginally significant) in-
crease in the initial rate of CH4 oxidation (PMOini,
indicating the active methanotrophic biomass when
taken from the field), while tuber density had marginal,
positive effects on the induced activity of CH4-oxidiz-
ing bacteria (PMOind, representing the total methan-
otrophic biomass present). Hence, in the field situation
direct and indirect effects are thus likely to act at dif-
ferent temporal scales. While the immediate effect of
swan burrowing affects the instantaneous activity of
active methanotrophic biomass in the short-term (i.e.
PMOini), pondweed abundance during the previous
growing season leads to enhanced total methano-
trophic biomass, detectable as higher PMOind over
longer periods of time (several months later).
At first sight, the indirect effects tested in the labo-
ratory experiment seem to be at odds with the positive
effect of tuber density on CH4 oxidation as observed in
the field. In clay-rich sediment, the presence of plants
resulted in increased CH4 production and decreased
CH4 oxidation (in both roots and sediment); in sandy
sediment, PMOroots and PMOsediment showed
opposite trends and PMP was negligible. It is, however,
important to note that such an experiment focuses on
the short-term response of the microbial community to
plant growth, while field data probably indicate its
overall, long-term result. Short-term decreases in
PMO, and increases in PMP in clay-rich sediment are
probably the result of root C exudation and subsequent
oxygen limitation for CH4-oxidizing bacteria due to
heterotrophic microbial respiration. This effect will be
enhanced by the low gas diffusivity of clay-rich sedi-
ment, and the reduced redox potential will lead to even
higher rates of root C exudation by the plants. Since
the increase in PMP did not result in higher CH4
availability in the short-term (CH4 concentration in the
Numbers of tubers per pot
Met
hane
pro
duct
ion
(nm
olC
H4.
g.-1
.h-1
)M
etha
ne o
xida
tion
(µm
ol C
H4.
g.-1
.h-1
)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2B
0 1 3 60.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6C
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
AClay-rich
Sandy
Fig. 3a–c Microbial activity in beakers filled with sandy andclay-rich sediment in which different densities of pondweedplants were cultivated. a CH4 oxidation in sediment. b CH4
oxidation in roots. c CH4 production in sediment. Bars indicatemeans±SEs
Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244 241
123
pore water was undetectable throughout the experi-
ment), we must conclude that the increased PMOind
observed in the field probably reflects a long-term re-
sponse to increased substrate availability, which re-
quires the accumulation of CH4 over much longer
periods of time than the duration of our laboratory
experiment (months instead of weeks). Finally, the
decrease in PMOroots (in both sand and clay) can be
explained by nutrient uptake effects: increased root
density results in decreased nutrient concentrations (N
and P) around the roots, thus decreasing PMO activity.
CH4 oxidation around roots of wetland plants seems to
depend strongly on the availability of N, for which
CH4-oxidizing bacteria can not compete for with plants
(Bodelier and Laanbroek 2004; Bodelier et al. 2000b).
The reduced activity of CH4-oxidizing bacteria with
increasing root biomass would theoretically lead to
higher CH4 emission. The latter will be less strong
when plant density is reduced by swan grazing.
An additional feed-back loop in the network of
relationships relating pondweeds, swans and sediment
microorganisms involves the negative effect that
microbial activity had on plant growth. The reasons for
this effect are unclear. It could be attributed to an
enhanced nutrient supply as a by-product of sediment
sterilization. However, plant shoot-to-root ratio de-
creased in sterilized sediment, contrary to what would
be expected if plants were released from nutrient lim-
itation (given that the sediment is the main source of
nutrients). Alternatively, it could be the result of de-
creased N supply to the pore water caused by bacterial
activity. In particular, N and NH4+ concentrations in the
pore water were higher (and CO2 lower) in sterile
sediment, particularly in clay-rich sediment. Moreover,
while the initial NH4+ concentration was comparable
for the sterile and non-sterile treatments, it decreased
over time in the non-sterile treatment from
0.39±0.12 mM in week 1 to 0.13±0.02 mM in week 4
but did not vary over time in the sterile treatment.
Although several studies have shown that NH3 oxi-
dizers are weak competitors against plants for NH4+
(Bodelier et al. 1998, 2000a), microbial activity could
have reduced the nutrient availability in the pore water
when plants were starting to grow (and thus not able to
compete for nutrients).
Numbers of tubers per pot
Sho
ot-r
oot r
atio
Tot
al p
lant
bio
mas
s (d
ry w
eigh
t)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
A
1 3 60.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5B
Non-sterile, clay-richNon-sterile, sandySterile, clay-richSterile, sandy
Fig. 4 Total biomass yield (a) and shoot-to-root ratio (b) ofpondweed plants grown in beakers filled with sterile and non-sterile, sandy and clay-rich sediment. Bars indicate means±SEs
Swans
Tubers
Pondweed
CH4 productionCH4 consumption
CH4 emission
-
- -++/-
-
--
+/-
+/- = Sand/clay
Fig. 5 Schematic presentation of the modulating mechanism ofdirect and indirect effects of swan grazing on CH4 emission fromthe investigated shallow lake ecosystem. The solid arrowsindicate relationships analysed in this study. The dotted arrowsindicate proposed effects on CH4 emission as the consequence ofthe analysed relationships.+ indicates a positive and – a negativeeffect of the different modules in this multitrophic system as theconsequence of swan grazing. ± indicates that a positive effect isobserved for sandy sediment and a negative effect for clayeysediment
242 Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244
123
In summary, we have demonstrated that the forag-
ing activity of swans modulates CH4 cycling in shallow
wetlands, while it seems to have little bearing on NH3
oxidation. Swan bioturbation decreased CH4 emission
both directly (through a decrease in the activity of
methanogenic bacteria and an increase in the rate of
CH4 oxidation in the bioturbated sediment) and indi-
rectly (through a decrease in the population density of
fennel pondweed, which reduced its positive effect on
the rates of CH4 production). The matrix of direct and
indirect effects of swan grazing on CH4 cycling
microbiological processes and the resultant CH4
emission are presented in Fig. 5. Collectively the
grazing activities of swans can potentially result in re-
duced emission of CH4 from shallow lake ecosystems
(see Fig. 5). The scheme also highlights that the extent
of the swan grazing effect on CH4 emission will partly
depend on the sediment clay content.
Besides its direct importance for CH4 cycling in
wetlands, the interactions between herbivores and
sediment microbes described here is likely to result in
increased stability of the swan–pondweed relationship.
Given that microbial activity seemed to have negative
effects on plant growth, particularly in clay-rich sedi-
ment (which promotes anaerobic conditions), the
combined effects of sediment oxygenation and reduced
activity of anaerobic bacteria are likely to benefit those
tubers surviving swan predation.
Effects of herbivory on belowground processes and
their feedback mechanisms has been intensively
investigated in terrestrial systems (cf. Ayres et al. 2004;
Bardgett and Wardle 2003; Walker et al. 2003). In
these studies microbiological processes are mainly af-
fected by altered input of C by plants as a direct effect
of the action of the herbivores on the plants or by
nutrient input (e.g. N) via faeces of waterfowl. These
kinds of multi-trophic interactions have only rarely
been investigated in aquatic systems (Connors et al.
2000; Walker et al. 2003). Moreover, direct effects of
larger vertebrates on microbiological processes have,
to our knowledge, only been reported in two studies. In
one case muskrats stimulated nitrification through
bioturbation (Connors et al. 2000) and in another N
fixation was stimulated in a tidal saltmarsh as the
consequence of grazing activities by geese (Bazely and
Jefferies 1989). The observed bi-trophic and multi-
trophic relationships in our study may have direct ef-
fects on an important ecosystem function, namely the
emission of the greenhouse gas CH4 to the atmosphere.
In that light the presented swan–pondweed–microbe
system represents an important model system for
studying the importance of multitrophic interactions in
relation to ecosystem functioning.
Acknowledgements Thijs de Boer, Oscar Langevoord andKlaas Siewertsen provided technical support in the field andlaboratory. Special thanks are due to Wiecher Smant (NIOO-KNAW, Centre for Terrestrial Ecology) for carrying out part ofthe chemical analyses. This publication is publication number3839 of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW),Centre for Limnology, Nieuwersluis, the Netherlands. The au-thors declare hereby that all experiments described in the pres-ent study comply with the current laws in the Netherlands.
References
Ayres E, Heath J, Possell M, Black HIJ, Kerstiens G, BardgettRD (2004) Tree physiological responses to above-groundherbivory directly modify below-ground processes of soilcarbon and nitrogen cycling. Ecol Lett 7:469–479
Bardgett RD, Wardle DA (2003) Herbivore-mediated linkagesbetween aboveground and belowground communities.Ecology 84:2258–2268
Bazely DR, Jefferies RL (1989) Lesser snow geese and thenitrogen economy of a grazed salt-marsh. J Ecol 77:24–34
Beekman JH, Nolet BA, Klaassen M (2002) Skipping swans:fueling rates and wind conditions determine differential useof migratory stopover sites of Bewick’s swans Cygnus bew-ickii. Ardea 90:437–460
Bodelier PLE (2003) Interactions between oxygen-releasingroots and microbial processes in flooded soils and sediments.In: de Kroon H, Visser EJW (ed) Ecological studies; rootecology, vol 168. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp331–362
Bodelier PLE, Frenzel P (1999) Contribution of methanotrophicand nitrifying bacteria to CH4 and NH4 oxidation in therhizosphere of rice plants as determined by new methods ofdiscrimination. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1826–1833
Bodelier PLE, Laanbroek HJ (2004) Nitrogen as a regulatoryfactor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments. FEMSMicrobiol Ecol 47:265–277
Bodelier PLE, Libochant JA, Blom CWPM, Laanbroek HJ(1996) Dynamics of nitrification and denitrification in root-oxygenated sediments and adaptation of ammonia-oxidizingbacteria to low-oxygen or anoxic habitats. Appl EnvironMicrobiol 62:4100–4107
Bodelier PLE, Wijlhuizen AG, Blom CWPM, Laanbroek HJ(1997) Effects of photoperiod on growth of and denitrifica-tion by Pseudomonas chlororaphis in the root zone of Gly-ceria maxima, studied in a gnotobiotic microcosm. Plant Soil190:91–103
Bodelier PLE, Duyts H, Blom CWPM, Laanbroek HJ (1998)Interactions between nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria ingnotobiotic microcosms planted with the emergent macro-phyte glyceria maxima. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 25:63–78
Bodelier PLE, Hahn AP, Arth IR, Frenzel P (2000a) Effects ofammonium-based fertilisation on microbial processes in-volved in methane emission from soils planted with rice.Biogeochemistry 51:225–257
Bodelier PLE, Roslev P, Henckel T, Frenzel P (2000b) Stimu-lation by ammonium-based fertilizers of methane oxidationin soil around rice roots. Nature 403:421–424
Boon PI, Mitchell A (1995) Methanogenesis in the sediments ofan Australian freshwater wetland: comparison with aerobicdecay, and factors controlling methanogenesis. FEMSMicrobiol Ecol 18:175–190
Caffrey JM, Kemp WM (1991) Seasonal and spatial patterns ofoxygen production and root-rhizome release in Potamogetonperfoliatus L. and Zostera marina L. Aquat Bot 40:109–128
Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244 243
123
Christensen PB, Revsbech NP, Sandjensen K (1994) Microsensoranalysis of oxygen in the rhizosphere of the aquatic mac-rophyte Littorella uniflora (L.) Ascherson. Plant Physiol105:847–852
Connors LM, Kiviat E, Groffman PM, Ostfeld RS (2000)Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) disturbance to vegetation andpotential net nitrogen mineralization and nitrification ratesin a freshwater tidal marsh. Am Midl Nat 143:53–63
Gilbert B, Frenzel P (1998) Rice roots and CH4 oxidation: theactivity of bacteria, their distribution and the microenvi-ronment. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1903–1916
Hangelbroek HH, Ouborg NJ, Santamaria L, Schwenk K (2002)Clonal diversity and structure within a population of thepondweed Potamogeton pectinatus foraged by Bewick’sswans. Mol Ecol 11:2137–2150
Heilman MA, Carlton RG (2001) Methane oxidation associatedwith submersed vascular macrophytes and its impact onplant diffusive methane flux. Biogeochemistry 52:207–224
Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, Vanderlinden PJ,Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) (2001) IPCC climatechange 2001: the scientific basis. Contributions of theworking group I to the third assessment report of theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge
Idestam-Almquist J (1998) Waterfowl herbivory on Potamog-eton pectinatus in the Baltic sea. Oikos 81:323–328
Kankaala P, Bergstrom I (2004) Emission and oxidation ofmethane in Equisetum fluviatile stands growing on organicsediment and sand bottoms. Biogeochemistry 67:21–37
Karjalainen H, Stefansdottir G, Tuominen L, Kairesalo T (2001)Do submersed plants enhance microbial activity in sedi-ment? Aquat Bot 69:1–13
LeMer J, Roger P (2001) Production, oxidation, emission andconsumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur J Soil Biol37:25–50
Mitsch JW, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, NewYork
Nolet BA (2004) Overcompensation and grazing optimisation ina swan-pondweed system? Freshwater Biol 49:1391–1399
Nolet BA, Langevoord O, Bevan RM, Engelaar KR, KlaassenM, Mulder RJW, Van Dijk S (2001) Spatial variation intuber depletion by swans explained by differences in netintake rates. Ecology 82:1655–1667
Nolet BA, Bevan RM, Klaassen M, Langevoord O, Van derHeijden Y (2002) Habitat switching by Bewick’s swans:maximization of average long-term energy gain? J AnimEcol 71:979–993
Ottosen LDM, Risgaard-Petersen N, Nielsen LP (1999) Directand indirect measurements of nitrification and denitrifica-tion in the rhizosphere of aquatic macrophytes. AquatMicrob Ecol 19:81–91
Pedersen O, Sandjensen K, Revsbech NP (1995) Diel pulses ofO2 and CO2 in sandy lake sediments inhabited by lobeliadortmanna. Ecology 76:1536–1545
Risgaard-Petersen N, Jensen K (1997) Nitrification and denitri-fication in the rhizosphere of the aquatic macrophyteLobelia dortmanna L. Limnol Oceanogr 42:529–537
Rowe R, Todd R, Waide J (1977) Microtechnique for most-probable-number analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:675–680
Santamaria L, Rodriguez-Girones MA (2002) Hiding fromswans: optimal burial depth of sago pondweed tubers for-aged by Bewick’s swans. J Ecol 90:303–315
Segers R (1998) Methane production and methane consumption:a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes.Biogeochemistry 41:23–51
Sondergaard M, Lauridsen TL, Jeppesen E, Bruun l (1997)Macrophyte–waterfowl interactions: tracking a variable re-source and the impact of herbivory on plant growth. In:Jeppesen ESM, Sondergaard M, Christoffessen K (eds) Thestructuring role of submerged macrophytes in Lakes.Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York , pp 298–306
Sorrell BK, Downes MT, Stanger CL (2002) Methanotrophicbacteria and their activity on submerged aquatic macro-phytes. Aquat Bot 72:107–119
Troelstra SR, Wagenaar R, Smant W, Deboer W (1995) Soilnitrogen transformations and nitrate utilization by Des-champsia flexuosa (L.) Trin at two contrasting heathlandsites. Plant Soil 176:81–93
Walker NA, Henry HAL, Wilson DJ, Jefferies RL (2003) Thedynamics of nitrogen movement in an Arctic salt marsh inresponse to goose herbivory: a parameterized model withalternate stable states. J Ecol 91:637–650
244 Oecologia (2006) 149:233–244
123