29 05 2020 Sh Gagandeep Singh ADJ Duty Judge.pdf

Bail Application No.1400/20 FIR No.575/19State v. Arti @ Kanchan PS Jahangir PuriU/s 376/328/384/109/120B/34 IPC & 67A IT Act

29.05.2020

The proceedings are being conducted through video conferencing withthe consent of the parties in terms of the directions of the Ld. District andSessions Judge, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi.

Present: Ld. Additional PP for the state.

Sh. Avadh Narayan , Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Reply to the application have been received.

Notice to the complainant be issued through SHO concerned for the

next date.

Accordingly, put up on 01.06.2020.

(Gagandeep Singh) ADJ01/Duty Judge, North

Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1399/20FIR No.17/20State v. ParvinderPS Adarsh Nagar U/s 356/379/411/120B/34 IPC

29.05.2020



Sh.J.K Dalal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Heard on the bail application preferred on behalf of the applicant

Parvinder.

It is pleaded on behalf of the applicant that he has been falsely

implicated and is in J/c since 23.01.2020. It is further stated that the coaccused has

already been admitted to interim bail vide order dated 08.04.2020. It is further stated

that the parents of the applicant are old and suffering from various diseases.

Ld. APP has opposed the said application stating that the accused

refused to undergo TIP.

Heard and perused the record

The recovery of the stolen articles have been affected.

The coaccused is already admitted to bail. No other involvement of

the applicant is reported. No useful purpose would be served in keeping the accused

in J/C and in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Suo

Moto Writ petition no. ©.1/2020 in RE: contagion of Covid19 Virus in persons and

that of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in W.P(C) 2945/2020 in the matter of Shobha

Gupta v. Union of India & Ors. Dated 23.03.2020 as well as decisions of High

Powered Committee of Hon'ble High Court dated 28.03.2020, 07.04.2020,

18.04.2020 and 18.05.2020, considering the fact that the accused is in JC since

23.01.2020 and has no previous involvement, the accused Parvinder is admitted to

interim bail for a period of 45 days from the date of release subject to furnishing of

personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/ to the satisfaction of concerned Jail

Superintendent.

The interim bail order is allowed subject to the conditions that the

applicant shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent on expiry of

interim bail period.

The applicant be also properly briefed by the Jail authorities with

respect to the prevalent situation and observing the norms of social distancing.

Application is accordingly disposed off.

Copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent as well as one

copy be sent to the concerned court for information and necessary action.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No.1403/20 FIR No.187/19State v. Sushil Kumar Pandey PS Crime Branch U/s 21/22/25/29 NDPS Act & 120B IPC

29.05.2020



Sh. S.K Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Partly heard on the application on behalf of the accused Sushil.

It is pleaded that he is seeking interim bail on the ground of delivery

of the child by wife of the applicant on 18.04.2020. She is alone at her house and

requires the company of the applicant / accused.

Ld. APP for state submits that the reply is silent with respect to the

said ground pleaded in the application and report in this regard be called from the IO

with respect to the veracity of the documents as well as the other members in the

family.

Notice be issued to the IO for calling of the report with respect to the

verification of the medical documents as well as other family members present in the

house of the family of the applicant for 02.06.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1391/2020FIR No.240/19State v. Jaswinder Singh PS Crime Branch U/s 406/420/467/468/471/34/120B IPC

29.05.2020



Sh. Suresh Tomar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Partly heard on the application on behalf of the accused Jaswinder.

It is pleaded that the co accused persons namely Sumit Goel, Lalit

Mohan Goel, Naveen Yadav, Gurmeet Singh, Ajay are admitted to regular bail. The

applicant is merely one of the minor coconspirator who is still behind the bars.

Ld. APP for state submits that the reply with respect to the status of

the coaccused is silent in this regard.

Notice be issued to the IO for filing reply with respect to the status of

the other accused persons for 30.05.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No.1390/2020 FIR No.68/2020State v. Anil Kumar PS Jahangir Puri U/s 306/498/34 IPC

29.05.2020



Sh. Suresh Tomar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Heard on the application preferred on behalf of the accused u/s 439

Cr.P.C.

It is pleaded that the accused is lying in J/C since 19.02.2020 and trial

is yet to began. The trial will take some time due to the present circumstances of the

COVID19.

It is further stated that the children of the applicant are very young

and there is no one in the whole family after death of his wife.

Ld. APP for the state opposed that the allegations are serious against

him.

Heard and perused the record.

Accused has been charge sheeted for offence u/s 306/498A/34 IPC

after being arrested on 19.02.2020. The first application was dismissed as withdrawn

before the Ld. Trial court. The allegations against the applicant are serious in nature.

No ground for interim bail is made out.

Application is accordingly dismissed.

Copy of the order be sent to the Jail Superintendent as well as uploaded

as per rules.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 3111/19FIR No.498/18State v. Kuldeep PS Mahendra Park U/s 302/34 IPC

29.05.2020The proceedings are being conducted through video conferencing with the consent

of the parties in terms of the directions of the Ld. District and Sessions Judge, NorthDistrict, Rohini Courts, Delhi.


Sh.H.S Sahni, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Heard on the application preferred u/s 439 Cr.P.C on behalf of the applicant.

It is pleaded on behalf of the applicant that the accused was arrested on

14.01.2019 and since then, he is in J/C. He was a young aged boy of 18 years. It is further stated

that the applicant also suffered serious injury of stabbing on the left thigh for which he has

already been operated upon. Further, it is stated that he can not walk properly and requires further

specialized treatment.

Lastly, it is argued that the material eye witness have already turned hostile and

were cross examined by the Ld. APP for the state.

Ld. APP for state opposed the present application stating that the same is not

covered within the guidelines of the HPC of the Hon'ble High Court. It is further argued that the

question on merits in the present case can not be decided at this stage as scientific evidence is yet

to be appreciated.


The case of the applicant is not covered within the scope of the guidelines of the

HPC of the Hon'ble High Court. The other ground on which bail has been sought is specialized

medical treatment in this regard. The medical documents which have been placed on record are

of year 201819. None of the medical documents have been filed showing requirement of the

specialized medical treatment. The allegations are serious in nature.



Copy of the order be sent to the Jail Superintendent as well as uploaded as per

rules.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1204/20FIR No.0392/19State v. AfrojPS Jahangir Puri U/s 498A/306/354/376 IPC

29.05.2020



Ms. Swati Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

No report regarding notice to the complainant received.

Issue fresh notice to the complainant through IO for the next date.

Put up on 02.06.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1401/2020FIR No.485/19State v. Seema PS Mahindra Park U/s 376/506/323/328/120B/34 IPC

29.05.2020



Sh.Mukesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Partly heard on the application moved on behalf of the applicant

Seema.

The accused has been charge sheeted for the offence u/s 376 IPC.

Accordingly, issue notice to the complainant through IO for the

NDOH.

Put up on 01.06.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1200/2020FIR No.94/2020State v. Ranjeet @ Honey PS Adarsh Nagar U/s 376 IPC & 4 POCSO Act

29.05.2020



Sh Prashant Diwan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Heard and considered the record.

The present application is filed u/s 376/54 IPC and Section 4 of

POCSO Act. Hence, the complainant is to be mandatory heard.

Notice be issued to the complainant through the IO for the

NDOH.

At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that he is seeking

interim bail on the ground of condition of his family and fresh report with respect to

the family conditions be also called for the next date.

Notice be issued to the IO for filing the report with respect to the

family condition and number of the family members of the applicant be also

filed for 02.06.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1274/2020FIR No.638/15State v. Manish Singh Chauhan @ Bhoora PS Mahindra Park U/s 302 IPC

29.05.2020The proceedings are being conducted through video conferencing with the consent

of the parties in terms of the directions of the Ld. District and Sessions Judge, NorthDistrict, Rohini Courts, Delhi.


Sh.Sanjeev Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Heard on the application preferred on behalf of the applicant u/s 439 Cr.P.C.

It is pleaded on behalf of the applicant that the case of the applicant is covered

within the guidelines of the Hon'ble HPC of 18.05.2020. It is further stated that there is no other

involvement except the present case. He is in J/c since 01.08.2015.

Ld. APP for the state submits that if the case of the applicant is covered within

the scope of guidelines of HPC of the Hon'ble High Court, he has no objection.

In view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Suo Moto

Writ petition no. ©.1/2020 in RE: contagion of Covid19 Virus in persons and that of Hon'ble

High Court of Delhi in W.P(C) 2945/2020 in the matter of Shobha Gupta v. Union of India &

Ors. Dated 23.03.2020 as well as decisions of High Powered Committee of Hon'ble High Court

dated 28.03.2020 and 07.04.2020, 18.04.2020 and considering the fact that the accused is in JC

since 01.08.2015 and has no previous involvement, the accused Sunder @ Sagar is admitted to

interim bail for a period of 45 days from the date of release subject to furnishing of personal bond

in the sum of Rs.50,000/ to the satisfaction of concerned Jail Superintendent. It is further

ordered that he will not contact or try to influence the witnesses of the present matter in any

manner.

The interim bail order is allowed subject to the conditions that the applicant shall

surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent on expiry of interim bail period.

The applicant be also properly briefed by the Jail authorities with respect to the

prevalent situation and observing the norms of social distancing.


Copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent as well as one copy be sent

to the concerned court for information and necessary action.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1784/2020FIR No.645/15State v. Naveen Dabas PS Bawana U/s 302 IPC

29.05.2020The proceedings are being conducted through video conferencing with the

consent of the parties in terms of the directions of the Ld. District and Sessions Judge,North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi.


Sh.Yashvir Singh, Ld. LAC for DLSA for the applicant.





In view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Suo

Moto Writ petition no. ©.1/2020 in RE: contagion of Covid19 Virus in persons and that of

Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in W.P(C) 2945/2020 in the matter of Shobha Gupta v. Union

of India & Ors. Dated 23.03.2020 as well as decisions of High Powered Committee of

Hon'ble High Court dated 28.03.2020 and 07.04.2020, 18.04.2020 as well as on 18.05.2020

and considering the fact that the accused is in JC since 01.10.2015 and has no previous

involvement, the accused Naveen Dabas is admitted to interim bail for a period of 45 days

from the date of release subject to furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/ to

the satisfaction of concerned Jail Superintendent. It is further ordered that he will not contact

or try to influence the witnesses of the present matter in any manner.

The interim bail order is allowed subject to the conditions that the applicant

shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent on expiry of interim bail period.

The applicant be also properly briefed by the Jail authorities with respect to

the prevalent situation and observing the norms of social distancing.


Copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent as well as one copy be

sent to the concerned court for information and necessary action.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1760/2020FIR No.246/14State v. Pushpak Rana PS Alipur U/s 302/34 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act















involvement, the accused Pushpak Rana is admitted to interim bail for a period of 45 days












Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1759/2020FIR No.246/14State v. Rupak Rana PS Alipur U/s 302/34 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act















involvement, the accused Rupak Rana is admitted to interim bail for a period of 45 days












Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No.1406/2020 FIR No.537/17State v. Paras @ Ram Babu PS Jahangir Puri U/s 20 NDPS Act

29.05.2020The proceedings are being conducted through video conferencing with

the consent of the parties in terms of the directions of the Ld. District andSessions Judge, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi. Present: Ld. Additional PP for the state.

Sh.Parkash Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Heard on the application moved on behalf of the applicant seeking for

bail for the applicant Paras @ Ram Babu.

It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that report regarding

the conduct of the applicant be called from the Jail Superintendent. IT is further

submitted that applicant is falsely implicated and no recovery has been effected in

the present matter. He has no previous involvement. It is further stated that the

CCTV footage of the area of the said alleged date of recovery has not been provided

deliberately by the prosecution.

Ld. APP for the state opposed the present application stating that the

allegations are serious in nature. It is further stated that the case is not covered by the

guidelines of the HPC of the Hon'ble High Court and there is no requirement of the

calling of the good conduct report from the Jail Superintendent.


The recovery of the commercial quantity of the 134 kgs Ganja has been

recovered from the applicant / accused. He is involved in eight more serious criminal

cases.




as per rules.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1392/2020FIR No.338/2020State v. Neeraj PS Adarsh Nagar U/s 392/411/34 IPC

29.05.2020



Ms. Archana Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Heard on the application moved on behalf of the applicant seeking

bail on behalf of the applicant Neeraj.

It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that FIR is silent with

respect to the role of the applicant. The applicant was arrested on the next day and

the recovery has been planted upon him. Hence, prayer is made for grant of bail.

Ld. APP for the state opposed the present application stating that the

allegations are serious in nature.


The applicant was arrested subsequent to the arrest of one of the

accomplice Ravi at the spot. The recovery of the photocopy of the stolen PAN card has

been affected from the applicant. The applicant is previously involved in a similar nature

of case at PS Adarsh Nagar. Keeping in the view the previous conduct of the applicant,

no ground for interim bail is made out.



as per rules.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1785/20FIR No.638/15State v. Manish Singh Chauhan PS Mahendra Park U/s 302 IPC

29.05.2020



Sh.Yashvir Singh, LAC from DLSA for the applicant.

The matter in question has already been heard at serial no.5 on the

application preferred by the private counsel namely Sanjeev Kumar.

The present application is thereby disposed off as infructuous.

Order be given dasti as prayed for.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No.1386/2020 FIR No.79/16State v. Naveen Khatri PS Model Town U/s 302/201 IPC

29.05.2020



Sh. Viney Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Heard on the application moved on behalf of the applicant.

Reply has been received.

Issue notice to the Jail Superintendent for filing the good conduct

report of the applicant for the NDOH.

Put up on 30.05.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1280/20FIR No.467/17State v. Sunder @ Sagar PS Adarsh Nagar U/s 302/307/324/34 IPC

29.05.2020The proceedings are being conducted through video conferencing with

the consent of the parties in terms of the directions of the Ld. District andSessions Judge, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi.


Sh.Suraj Prakash, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Report has also been received from the Jail Superintendent regarding

conduct of the applicant / accused. It is pleaded that the same is unsatisfactory.

Several punishments have been recorded.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the report is not clear as the

applicant has no other involvement except the present case.

The report does not gives the details as to the punishment and in what

context, the conduct is unsatisfactory. It is also apparent from report by the IO that

there is no other involvement and the case of the applicant is covered within the

scope of the guidelines of the HPC of the Hon'ble High Court.

In view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in

Suo Moto Writ petition no. ©.1/2020 in RE: contagion of Covid19 Virus in persons

and that of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in W.P(C) 2945/2020 in the matter of

Shobha Gupta v. Union of India & Ors. Dated 23.03.2020 as well as decisions of

High Powered Committee of Hon'ble High Court dated 28.03.2020, 07.04.2020,

18.04.2020 and 18.05.2020, considering the fact that the accused is in JC since

27.11.2017 and has no previous involvement, the accused Sunder @ Sagar is

admitted to interim bail for a period of 45 days from the date of release subject to

furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/ to the satisfaction of

concerned Jail Superintendent. It is further ordered that he will not contact or try to

influence any of witnesses of present matter in any manner.





respect to the prevalent situation and observing the norms of social distancing etc.





Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1268/2020FIR No.285/19State v. Sumit PS Adarsh NagarU/s 307/34 IPC & 25/54/59 Arms Act

At 2:30 PM29.05.2020



Sh. Tarun Gahlot, Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused.

No report of Good Conduct of the applicant/ accused has been

received from the Jail Superintendent.

Notice be issued to the Jail Superintendent to file the report of Good

Conduct of the applicant/ accused for 30.05.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1405/2020FIR No.537/17State v. Lal Babu @ Ravi @ PappuPS JahangirpuriU/s 20.61/85 NDPS Act

29.05.2020



Sh. Parkash Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused.

Heard on the interim bail filed on behalf of the applicant/ accused.

No reply to the bail application has been received from IO/SHO.

Notice be again issued to the IO/ SHO concerned to file the report on

next date of hearing.

Notice be also issued to the Jail Superintendent to file the report of

Good Conduct of the applicant/ accused for 03.06.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1404/2020FIR No.388/2020State v. Vishal Saini @ Bunty & Ors.PS Adarsh NagarU/s 411/392/34 IPC

At 2:40 PM29.05.2020



None for the applicant/ accused Vishal Saini @ Bunty.

The Mobile Number provided by the Counsel for the applicant is

incomplete and hence, he could not be contacted.

No reply has been received from the IO/SHO.

Notice be again issued to the IO/SHO to file the reply to the

application for 03.06.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1762/2020FIR No. 129/15State v. Bhanu RaghavPS AlipurU/s 302/34 IPC

29.05.2020



Sh. Yashvir Singh, Ld. Counsel from DLSA for the applicant.

Heard on the application preferred on behalf of the applicant

u/s 439 Cr.P.C.

It is pleaded on behalf of the applicant that the case of the applicant is

covered within the guidelines of the Hon'ble HPC of 18.05.2020. It is further stated

that there is no other involvement except the present case. He is in J/c since

06.02.2015.






18.04.2020 and 18.05.2020 as well as considering the fact that the accused is in JC

since 06.02.2015 and has no previous involvement, the accused is admitted to



Superintendent. He shall in no manner contact or try to influence the witnesses of the

present matter.




Cont.....

2







Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1422/2020FIR No. 792/18State v. Sanjay s/o AshokPS NarelaU/s 304/34 IPC

29.05.2020The proceedings are being conducted through video conferencing

with the consent of the parties in terms of the directions of the Ld. District andSessions Judge, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi.


Sh. Yashvir Singh, Ld. Counsel from DLSA for the

applicant/accused.


u/s 439 Cr.P.C.




29.11.2018.











present matter.




Cont.....

2







Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1421/2020FIR No. 373/17State v. Heera Lal Wati S/o Sh. Tek ChandPS JahangirpuriU/s 302 IPC





applicant/accused.


u/s 439 Cr.P.C.




16.08.2017.











present matter.




Cont.....

2







Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1396/2020FIR No. 247/17State v. Robin @ VickyPS AlipurU/s 302/34 IPC





applicant/accused.


u/s 439 Cr.P.C.




25.08.2017.











present matter.




Cont.....

2







Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1758/2020FIR No. 356/15State v. Devinder @ KalePS Samaypur BadliU/s 302/34

29.05.2020




No reply has been received from the IO with respect to the previous

involvement of the applicant.

Issue notice to the IO to file the previous conviction report for

30.05.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

Bail Application No. 1398/2020FIR No. 161/15State v. AnishPS BawanaU/s 302 IPC

29.05.2020




Heard on the bail application preferred on behalf of the applicant

Anish.

Ld. Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant submits that he has filed on

record the custody details as well as the conduct certificate of the applicant Anish

and hence, he may be admitted to bail as the case of the applicant is covered within

the guidelines of the Hon'ble HPC of 18.05.2020.

Ld. APP for the State opposed the said application stating that as per

the previous involvement of the applicant, he is involved in FIR No. 161/15 PS

Bawana.

Heard and considered the record.

The case of the applicant is not covered within the scope of the

guidelines of the HPC of the Hon'ble High Court.


Copy of the order be sent to the Jail Superintendent as well as

uploaded as per rules.


Rohini, Delhi

FIR No.320/12State v. SantramPS Bawana U/s 302/34 IPC

29.05.2020

Fresh bail application received. Be checked and registered.



This is a fresh application for interim bail moved by placing reliance

has been guidelines of the HPC of the Hon'ble High Court.

Notice be issued to the IO / SHO for filing previous involvement

report for 30.05.2020.


Rohini, Delhi

FIR No.283/14State v. Suraj @ Radhey PS Jahangir Puri U/s 302/34 IPC

29.05.2020

Fresh bail application received. Be checked and registered.








Rohini, Delhi

FIR No.345/15State v. Shiv Nandan Rathore PS Adarsh Nagar U/s 302/201 IPC

29.05.2020









Rohini, Delhi

FIR No.185/16State v. Sunil @ Golu PS Samaypur Badli U/s 302/201/34 IPC

29.05.2020









Rohini, Delhi

FIR No.133/18State v. Sunil Dutt @ Anne PS Narela U/s 302/307/120B/34 IPC

29.05.2020









Rohini, Delhi

FIR No.285/19State v. Sumit PS Adarsh Nagar U/s 307/34 IPC & 25/27/54/59 Arms Act

29.05.2020









Rohini, Delhi

FIR No.383/17State v. Sarvesh PS Alipur U/s 302 IPC

29.05.2020









Rohini, Delhi

29 05 2020 Sh Gagandeep Singh ADJ Duty Judge.pdf

Documents

Transcript of 29 05 2020 Sh Gagandeep Singh ADJ Duty Judge.pdf