HOW EFFECTIVELY PEER-REVIEWING INFLUENCEJOURNAL ACCEPTANCE

An Academic presentation byDr. Nancy Agens, Head, Technical Operations, PhdassistanceGroup  www.phdassistance.comEmail: info@phdassistance.com

MENTION THE BASIC TENTS OFPEER-REVIEWING

In-Brief

Introduction

Importance of Peer Review

Peer-Review Process

Basic Tenets of Peer-Reviewing

Conclusion

Outline

TODAY'S DISCUSSION

In-Brief

PhD peer review process is similar for all journals. Once author submits amanuscript, it is initially reviewed by the journal editor to determine its relevanceaccording to the guidelines set by the editorial policy. Most of the journals use

some form of a checklist for the reviewer to critically analyze the submitted article.PhD Manuscript Peer Reviewing process generally does not change the

fundamental nature of the submitted manuscript; instead, it assists the authors toimprove the presentation and format of their work.

The PhD Manuscript Pre-Submission Peer Reviewprocess ensures the research findings are validand reliable.

The manuscript can not withstand scientificknowledge without an effective peer review process.

Without the process, the result may includedissemination of false or flawed knowledge.

Introduction

Contd..

It hardly takes about 10 to 12 weeks for publishing the manuscript in the scientificjournal of which most of the time consumed by the peer-review process.

Manuscript Peer Review a Guide helps to know about the reviewers to look forvarious aspects in the manuscript and look for the content that deems thenecessary things for publication.

To select the quality article for publication and filter thestudy that conceived, designed, executed with thefollowing selection method,

The validity of the research article and the methodology

To check the precision of the result obtained whethersupports the conclusion

To check the relevance of the article

To check the structure and format of the article

Importanceof PeerReview

Contd..

PhD Dissertation Peer Reviewing Services to check against misconductwithin the article

PhD Manuscript Peer Review Process provides editors with the evidence todecide whether the articles meet the selection criteria of the journal

The Peer review of the thesis is the critical process toensure the quality and the integrity of the research.

It is the process where researchers ask help to theirexpertise in their field to assess the article and check forits accuracy and rigour to help that the article builds oradds the current literature.

Manuscript Writing Help not only helps to maintain thequality and integrity of the literature in the manuscript.

It's key things that effectively develop your article.

Peer-ReviewProcess

Contd..

It is the way to keep abreast of current research, to impress journals toselect the document submitted.

Manuscript Peer review process helps you to review a manuscript, and spotcommon flaws in research papers, and improve your chances of beingpublished author.

The journal accepts High-value articles by standard formfor separating the fact.

For this particular reason, every researcher should conducttheir work ethically by avoiding conflicts of interest.

From conducting experiments to writing manuscripts andundergoing peer review, researchers must maintain a goodaccount in their work.

Four basic tenets involved in the Peer Review Service for PhDManuscripts,

DECLINE THE REVIEW IF YOU HAVE CONFLICT INTEREST

BasicTenets ofPeer-Reviewing

Contd..

PhD peer reviewing services editors seek out experts in the field to review themanuscript and add the comment.

There are rules for reviewers to avoid conflicts as well as simple rules for writing thathelp authors be clear regarding authorship and sponsorship.

The reviewer acts as the advisor to the journal editor.

When writing a review, one should describe the reason for the recommendation sothe editor can make an informed decision.

REMEMBER YOU'RE ADVISING THE JOURNAL EDITOR, NOT DECIDING ONWHETHER TO ACCEPT OR REJECT.

Contd..

It is more important to comment on the academic content of the paper than ongrammar and punctuation mistakes found in the paper.

However, if the language is too poor and if it is difficult to read the contentsadequately, then alert the journal editor.

The review we make will be sent to the author of the paper.

So, the reviewers are in a strong position to guide the author on how the manuscriptcan be in the standard format.

TRY TO BE HELPFUL TO THE AUTHOR

Contd..

While recommending acceptance or rejections, then the author can be beneficialfrom your review.

The review should intently help the author to make a better decision to make thepaper in the standard format.

Peer review should be collegial and respectful.

Reviewer revises the paper with the great understanding of the concept that theyare handling.

MAINTAIN CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE PAPER

Contd..

And this must be highly confidential as such they should not discuss thereview or disclose any of the content in the paper to other third parties.

The reviewer should not use their interest to develop the study further usingtheir knowledge.

Most of the reputed journal accepts the paper that is peerreviewed.

The increased use of the manuscript peer review is due totwo main factors:

The proliferation of the document is the primary reason todo peer review.

The next reason is the explosion of new information in thefield of study.

PhD Manuscript Writing Peer review service experts helpyou to evade the significant errors that decrease thequality of the manuscript.

Conclusion

Contact Us

+44-1143520021UNITED KINGDOM

INDIA+91-4448137070

EMAILinfo@phdassistance.com