Post on 28-Mar-2023
Paddy Altern 2014
1
What are the principle challenges and opportunities that Mediterranean
prehistory faces today?
Introduction
This paper focusses on the modern practice of archaeology, setting aside
definitional debates of “Mediterranean” and “prehistory”. Many challenges
and opportunities for archaeology are of course global, but this paper looks at
two themes which present particular challenges and opportunities for
Mediterranean prehistory.
The first recognises inherited, politicised and appropriating narratives,
institutions and practices, an inescapable context which must be managed,
but which creates paradoxical opportunities. The second theme is the vast
amount of Mediterranean data, much of it old or under-published. The
challenge of preserving data - that previously examined, that awaiting
recording and that within the heritage industry – and of accessing new
opportunities, is often in political and economic contexts over which
archaeologists have little control.
Appropriating Narratives, a witches’ brew
Fig.1. A Mediterranean pre-historian goes to work, or maybe it just feels like
that… Source: Still from The Hurt Locker, bestpictureproject.wordpress.com.
Paddy Altern 2014
2
The Mediterranean’s history has created a treacherous web of narratives
(Fig.1). Not least among those are “objective”, male, Northern European,
academic archaeologists’ perspectives – a fair description of author, whatever
his best intentions.
It is simplistic to only blame “colonial” creations of bias, whether narratives,
definitions (some literal by creating nation states by lines on maps), or foreign
archaeological schools. Mediterranean archaeologists must face something
far more complex, layered and demanding. As Hamilakis argues (2008), post-
colonial discussions could include Greece, a “crypto-colony” (Herzfeld 2002).
The Levantine Mandates experience was varied, by country and by
community (e.g. Druze, Alawite, Copt, Jew etc.). North Africa’s freedoms
were hard-won and then hard to identify under authoritarian rule. Spanish
colonies still sit in “Morocco” and a British colony snubs Spain.
Traditions, mind-sets and the privileging of text matrix through this political
complexity. Orientalism (Said 1979; Scheffler 2003) is as pervasive and long-
lasting as colonial structures (Meskell 2000; Wengrow 2010; Fig.2). Indeed it
has perhaps its greatest impact in the US, which had no Mediterranean
colonies (Fig.3; Segal 2000). The Levantine Mediterranean in particular has an
ambivalent position, stereotyped as a source of Western inheritance, cultural
and Biblical.
A similar web has been spun by Hellenism, another Western narrative,
creating ‘barbarian’ anachronisms for prehistory by using Greco-Roman
sources (Renfrew 1980; van Dommelen 2012,396) which themselves looked
back at a crudely essentialised primitive past (Purcell 1991,31). “Combined
with the classical paradigm, that of ex oriente lux has often diverted
archaeologists’ attention away from contextual analysis of local cultures and
polities beyond the Aegean, as well as their diachronic development” (Bietti
Sestieri et al. 2002,412). Rejection of these traditions has itself created a
mini-industry of narratives, often seeking earlier temporal justifications (e.g.
Bernal 1987; van Binsbergen 1997; Bahrani 1998).
Paddy Altern 2014
3
Fig.2. Bonaparte before the Sphinx (ca.1858), Jean-Léon Gérôme. Source:
Wikipedia:French campaigns in Egypt.
Fig.3 Tympanum of the Chicago Oriental Institute, the baton of civilisation
being passed… Source: oihistory.blogspot.co.uk
Paddy Altern 2014
4
Interacting with long-standing mind-sets and colonial creations are competing
nationalist uses for prehistory, or protohistory (itself stereotyping “primitive”
prehistory). These processes twist research priorities and interpretations,
seeking validation and creating identity from archaeological narratives. This is
a global challenge (Kohl et al. 2007), but perhaps most overt in the Eastern
Mediterranean: from the focus on Iron Age “Biblical” projects in Israel
(Greenberg pers.comm.; www.alt-arch.org; Yahya 2005); to modern day
pharaohs appropriating ancient senses of superiority in Egypt (Fig.4; O’Connor
2003); to Turkish control over permits for foreign fieldwork, campaigns for
artefact repatriation and centralising bureaucracy (Bonini Baraldi et al. 2012).
Governments are making sure that the past is not seen as another country
(Lowenthal 1985).
Identity metanarratives also operate sub-nationally. This has created an
explosion in regional and local museums (Fig.5; Skeates 2005). Separatist or
autonomist political parties also manipulate prehistory (e.g. Sardinia and
Crete: Broodbank 2013,50). Origin narratives even develop locally around
archaeological sites (Robb and Pauketat 2013,30).
To so capture the ability to create prehistoric narratives undermines the
colonial hegemony of the foreign archaeological schools but it is not an
encouragement for best practice or - based as nationalist policies often are on
tourist receipts - a balanced research agenda. The debate over narrative is
not academic in the Mediterranean (S.Sherratt 2005; Herzfeld 1995). Often all
of these biases come together in daily life.
Equally challenging for prehistorians are those modern Mediterranean
populations who do not engage with prehistory, often preferring to date their
identities from Christian or Islamic introductions (e.g. Malta: Sant Cassia
1999). The access to prehistory is incredibly uneven across the region (Fig.5).
Paddy Altern 2014
5
Fig.4. Hosni Mubarak, latterday pharaoh. Mural in Cairo. Source: AP
Photo/Emilio Morenatti (accessed 30/10/2013).
Fig.5. Number of museums in Mediterranean countries in 2001. Source:
Skeates 2005,309.
Paddy Altern 2014
6
Fig.6. The ‘Venus of Malta’, interpreted as a ‘fertility Goddess’. Clay figurine
from Hagar Qim temple, 3500–3000 B.C. Source: Rountree 2001,19.
Last but not least of the appropriators (certainly by number of adherents) are
the narratives of ‘goddess worshippers’ and similar (Rountree 2001; Talalay
2000). Engagement is possible (Hodder 2000), yet these narratives are as
potentially essentialising of Mediterranean prehistory as Orientalist
stereotypes, as well as being empirically questionable.
That we recognise all of these dynamics is the first step to doing valid work in
Mediterranean prehistory and thus realising the many opportunities that we
have. These challenges are generated by the fact that Mediterranean
prehistory matters and has done for at least two hundred years (Fig.2). The
Mediterranean is central to history far beyond its boundaries and relative to
its size (Broodbank 2013,26).
Paddy Altern 2014
7
The explicit debates and the application of post-colonial theory should allow
us to take apart stereotypes and identities (and not just those created by
overt colonialism), creating relational views of the past (Gosden 2007,170).
The “Mediterranean” itself can help as a concept, a diverse unity (Horden and
Purcell 2000). By highlighting connection and commonality, a Mediterranean
prehistory can challenge essentialist modes of thought and exclusive
nationalist practices.
The challenges are not insuperable. Spanish prehistoric archaeology is a fine
example of vibrant recent practice (e.g. Chapman 1990;2008; Aranda et al.
2009; Zilhao et al. 2010). Spain may be marginal in Orientalist discourse, yet it
shares the typical narrative palimpsest of the Mediterranean. Spain is the site
of many Islamic treasures, has its own much longer post-colonial history and a
recent focus on multiple narratives to move away from authoritarianism
(Gonzalez-Ruibal 2007). There is no part of the Mediterranean which can be
disconnected from this web of past connections and narratives but the
challenge can be risen to. Paradoxically, this requirement of reflexivity can
generate opportunities for more ethically and theoretically informed practice.
Data: Collection, Destruction, Preservation
The range of methodologies available to Mediterranean prehistory is vast, on
land and in the sea. No doubt non-exhaustively, they include, with examples:
standing remains (Kolb 2005); climatic data including palynology (Rosen 2007;
Roberts et al. 2001); excavations, including ‘big digs’ (Tringham 2003);
imagery (Shea 2003); geophysics (Sarris and Jones 2000); oceanographic
survey (Ballard 2008); maritime excavation and shipwrecks (Pulak 1998);
survey (Cherry 2003); seafaring analysis (Farr 2006); aerial photography
(Kennedy and Bewley 2009); geology and commercial mineral analyses
(Woodward 2009); GIS and satellite imagery (Bevan 2002); virtual reality
(Jablonka et al. 2002); some text in the precocious east; and ethnography
(Horden and Purcell 2000:463-84).
Paddy Altern 2014
8
This vast data resource is fragmented and uneven. Locally this often reflects
the traditional preoccupation with palace and tomb (Bevan 2002,217) or
survey methodologies not being standardised (Cherry 2003,146; Elefanti et al.
2011). Many excavations are early, and poorly published. North Africa west of
the Nile Delta remains underexplored (Shaw 2003; Broodbank 2013,36-
40,265-268). Conservation, fieldwork and publication are restricted with
much of the basin under austerity budgets (e.g. Kennedy 2012).
Some unstable countries may remain so or are having sites destroyed: the
Lebanon (Naccache 1998); Syria (Cunliffe 2012) and Libya (Bennett and Barker
2011). Importantly, “the identity-bound nature of contemporary wars is
linked to an increased incidence of cultural property destruction” (van der
Auwera 2012,49). Data destruction is not only the product of conflict. Long-
standing local and colonial looting (Galanakis 2012;2013; Gill and Chippindale
1993) serving the art market (Fig.7), and more (or less) legitimate museum
collecting (Skeates 2005) have unhealthy roles.
A CYCLADIC MARBLE RECLINING FEMALE FIGURE NAME-PIECE OF THE SCHUSTER MASTER, EARLY CYCLADIC II, CIRCA 2400 B.C.
Price Realized $16,882,500 (Set Currency)
Estimate $3,000,000 - $5,000,000
Sale Information
SALE 2364 — ANTIQUITIES INCLUDING PROPERTY FROM THE COLLECTION OF
MAX PALEVSKY
9 DECEMBER 2010, NEW YORK, ROCKEFELLER PLAZA
Fig.7. The power of the market, even if unprovenanced works
would achieve a fraction of this price, the appeal is obvious in
an extended recession. Source:
http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/ancient-art-antiquities/a-
cycladic-marble-reclining-female-figure-name-piece-5385394-
details.aspx accessed 26/11/13.
Paddy Altern 2014
9
This hampers our ability to create meaningful ontologies across projects and
crafts. If Mediterranean prehistory is to be understood as the overlaying and
interweaving of networks (Broodbank 2013; Knappett 2011), then having so
many under- or unpublished nodes is to our detriment (Fig.8).
Fig.8. The spread of the Neolithic ‘package’ across the Mediterranean. The
process cannot yet be replicated for want of data on the southern coast. Of
equal concern are the broad bands of apparent stasis, perhaps also data
driven. Source: Broodbank 2013,185.
Property and infrastructure development and environmental degradation are
even more destructive (e.g Meinesz et al 1991). Blondel’s co-evolution of
Mediterranean ecology and society requires a balance that we may have lost
(2006). There seems to be no consistent record for much grey literature this
generates (for its potential see Bradley 2007 in UK), yet exciting discoveries
and opportunities flow from commercial work. Valencina de la Concepcion
and Makryalos are two examples of rescue projects which developed into
major redefinitions of regional prehistory (Figs.9,10).
Paddy Altern 2014
10
Fig.9. Plan of the excavations at Makriyalos, Greece, either side of a major
road, which have altered our understanding of the Greek Neolithic. Source:
Pappa et al 2013,78.
Fig.10.
Valencina de
la Concepcion
outlined
under its
modern
urban
context.
Source: Costa
Caramé et al
2010,88.
Paddy Altern 2014
11
The long tradition of archaeological fieldwork means that the Mediterranean
suffers acutely the global issue of technology-led terminology: Neolithic,
Bronze Age, etc. (Sherratt 2007) and from notions of type-sites, which may
turn out to be atypical or which particularise otherwise valid groupings (e.g.
Tuleilat Ghassul: Rowan and Golden 2009,10). Further, the precocity of larger
scale societies in the region means that dynastic terminologies also confuse
(Broodbank 2013,14).
Access to Mediterranean sites involves multiple challenges. Restriction on
permits is an extension of the nationalist agendas (above). As fundamental is
the value of land near the Mediterranean. Where I dug recently near Paphos,
the site, somewhat smaller than a football pitch, would cost USD250,000
(Crewe pers.comm.). The project is only made possible by long-term access
offered by an absentee landowner.
Conclusion
Of course many archaeologists around the world would kill for such problems!
Challenges are well balanced by opportunities. The richness and time-depth
of Mediterranean material culture may globally be without parallel; its
preservation generally remarkable. The long historiography offers
opportunities to ‘visit’ sites now destroyed by development or to revisit sites
without the expense of fully reopening them.
Conflict and economic fragility, some of it perhaps structural and long-term,
mean that what remains to be explored is under terrible threat. Much of that
conflict, and the political upheavals that remain mostly peaceful, is intricately
woven with national, regional, religious and ethnic identities, many with
narratives from prehistory as foundational elements. By working within that
environment we will become more ethically focussed. By working within
policy and funding parameters we will focus our research questions. There
may be clouds in our azure Mediterranean sky but silver linings abound.
Paddy Altern 2014
12
References
Aranda, G., Montón-Subías, S., Sánchez-Romero, M., & Alarcón, E. (2009).
Death and everyday life. The Argaric societies from Southeast Iberia. Journal
of social Archaeology, 9(2), 139-162.
Bahrani, Z. (1998). Conjuring Mesopotamia: imaginative geography and a
world past. In Meskell, L. (Ed.) Archaeology under Fire, Nationalism, politics
and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London:
Routledge, 159-174.
Ballard, R. D. (2008). Searching for ancient shipwrecks in the deep sea.
Archaeological Oceanography, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 131-147.
Bennett, P., & Barker, G. (2011). Protecting Libya's archaeological heritage.
African Archaeological Review, 28(1), 5-25.
Bernal, M. (1987). Black Athena: Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization,
Volume I: The Fabrication of Ancient Greece, 1785-1985. Rutgers University
Press.
Bevan, A. (2002). The rural landscape of Neopalatial Kythera: A GIS
perspective. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 15(2), 217-256.
Bietti Sestieri, A. M., Cazzella, A., & Schnapp, A. (2002). The Mediterranean.
Archaeology: the widening debate, 411-38.
Blondel, J. (2006). The ‘design’of Mediterranean landscapes: a millennial story
of humans and ecological systems during the historic period. Human Ecology,
34(5), 713-729.
Bonini Baraldi, S., Shoup, D., & Zan, L. (2012). Understanding cultural heritage
in Turkey: institutional context and organisational Issues. International Journal
of Heritage Studies, 1-21.
Paddy Altern 2014
13
Bradley, R. (2007). The prehistory of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University
Press.
Broodbank, C. (2013). The Making of the Middle Sea: A History of the
Mediterranean from the Beginning to the Emergence of the Classical World.
Chapman, R. (2008). Producing Inequalities: Regional Sequences in Later
Prehistoric Spain. Journal of World Prehistory 21:195-260.
Chapman, R. (1990). Emerging complexity: The later prehistory of south-east
Spain, Iberia, and the west Mediterranean. Cambridge University Press.
Cherry, J. (2003). Archaeology beyond the site. In Papadopoulos, J. K., &
Leventhal, R. M. (Eds.). Theory and practice in Mediterranean archaeology:
Old World and New World perspectives. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology,
University of California, Los Angeles.
Costa Caramé, M. E., Díaz-Zorita Bonilla, M., García Sanjuán, L., & Wheatley,
D. W. (2010). The Copper Age settlement of Valencina de la Concepción
(Seville, Spain): demography, metallurgy and spatial organization. Trabajos de
prehistoria, 67(1).
Cunliffe, E. (2012). Damage to the Soul: Syria's Cultural Heritage in Conflict.
Global Heritage Fund.
Elefanti, P., Marshall, G., & Gamble, C. (2010). The Prehistoric Stones of
Greece: a resource of archaeological surveys and sites. Antiquity, 84:323.
Farr, H. (2006). Seafaring as social action. Journal of Maritime Archaeology,
1(1), 85-99.
Galanakis, Y., (2013). Early Prehistoric Research on Amorgos and the
Beginnings of Cycladic Archaeology. American Journal of Archaeology 117.
Galanakis, Y., (2012). “On Her Majesty’s Service: C.L.W. Merlin and the
Sourcing of Greek Antiquities for the British Museum.” Center for Hellenic
Paddy Altern 2014
14
Studies Research Symposium. http://argos.chs.harvard.edu/cgi-
bin/WebObjects/eJournal.woa/wa/dist?dis=170.
Gill, D. W., & Chippindale, C. (1993). Material and intellectual consequences of
esteem for Cycladic figures. American Journal of Archaeology, 601-659.
González-Ruibal, A. (2007). Making things public: archaeologies of the Spanish
Civil War. Public archaeology, 6(4), 203-226.
Gosden, C. (2007). Colonial and Post-Colonial Archaeology. In Meskell, L., &
Preucel, R. W. (Eds.). Companion to social archaeology. Wiley.
Hamilakis, Y. (2008). Decolonizing Greek archaeology: indigenous
archaeologies, modernist archaeology and the post-colonial critique. Museo
Benaki.
Herzfeld, M. (1995). Hellenism and Occidentalism: the permutations of
performance in Greek bourgeois identity. In Occidentalism: images of the
West, 218-233.
Herzfeld, M. (2002). The European self: rethinking an attitude. The idea of
Europe: from Antiquity to the European Union, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Hodder, I. (Ed). (2000). Towards Reflexive Methods in Archaeology: the
Example at Catalhoyuk. McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research/British
Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, Oxbow.
Horden, P. and Purcell, N. (2000). The Corrupting Sea. Blackwell.
Jablonka, P., Kirchner, S., & Serangeli, J. (2002). TroiaVR: A virtual reality
model of troy and the troad. CAA 2002 The Digital Heritage of Archaeology.
Kennedy, D., Bewley, R. (2009). Aerial archaeology in Jordan. Antiquity,
83(319), 69-81.
Kennedy, R. (2012). Greek Antiquities, Long Fragile, Are Endangered by
Austerity. New York Times, 11 June 2012.
Paddy Altern 2014
15
Knappett, C. (2011). An archaeology of interaction: network perspectives on
material culture and society.
Kohl, P. L., Kozelsky, M., & Ben-Yehuda, N. (Eds.). (2007). Selective
remembrances: archaeology in the construction, commemoration, and
consecration of national pasts. University of Chicago Press.
Kolb, M. (2005). The Genesis of Monuments among the Mediterranean
islands. In Blake, E., Knapp, A. (eds.). The Archaeology of Mediterranean
Prehistory.
Lowenthal, D. (1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge University
Press.
Meinesz, A., Lefevre, J. R., & Astier, J. M. (1991). Impact of coastal
development on the infralittoral zone along the southeastern Mediterranean
shore of continental France. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 23, 343-347.
Meskell, L. (2000). The practice and politics of archaeology in Egypt. Annals of
the New York Academy of Sciences, 925(1), 146-169.
Miller, H. M. L. (2007). Archaeological approaches to technology.
Elsevier/Academic Press.
Naccache, A. F. H. (1998). Beirut’s memorycide. In Meskell, L. (Ed.)
Archaeology Under Fire.
O'Connor, D. (Ed.). (2003). Mysterious lands. CRC Press.
Pappa, M. et al. (2013). The Neolithic site of Makriyalos, northern Greece: a
reconstruction of the social and economic structure of the settlement through
a comparative study of the finds. Pharos Supplement 1. Diet, economy and
society in the ancient Greek world.
Pulak, C. (1998). The Uluburun shipwreck: an overview. International Journal
of Nautical Archaeology, 27(3), 188-224.
Paddy Altern 2014
16
Purcell, N. (1991). Mobility and the polis. In Murray (Ed.) The Greek City from
Homer to Alexander. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Renfrew, C. (1980). The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: archaeology
as anthropology?. American Journal of Archaeology, 84(3), 287-298.
Robb, J. Pauketat, T. (2013). From Moments to Millenia. In Robb, J. Pauketat,
T. (eds.) Big Histories, Human Lives. SAR Press.
Roberts, N., Eastwood, W. J., Kuzucuoğlu, C., Fiorentino, G., & Caracuta, V.
(2011). Climatic, vegetation and cultural change in the eastern Mediterranean
during the mid-Holocene environmental transition. The Holocene, 21(1), 147-
162.
Rosen, A. M. (2007). Civilizing climate: The social impact of climate change in
the ancient Near East. Rowman Altamira.
Rountree, K. (2001). The past is a foreigners' country: Goddess feminists,
archaeologists, and the appropriation of prehistory. Journal of Contemporary
Religion, 16(1), 5-27.
Rowan, Y. M., & Golden, J. (2009). The Chalcolithic period of the Southern
Levant: a synthetic review. Journal of World Prehistory, 22(1), 1-92.
Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
Sant Cassia, P. (1999). Tradition, tourism and memory in Malta. Journal of the
royal anthropological institute, 247-263.
Sarris, A., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Geophysical and related techniques applied to
archaeological survey in the Mediterranean: A review. Journal of
Mediterranean Archaeology, 13(1), 3-75.
Scheffler, T. (2003). ‘Fertile Crescent’,‘Orient’,‘Middle East’: The Changing
Mental Maps of Southwest Asia. European Review of History: Revue
Européenne d'Histoire, 10(2), 253-272.
Paddy Altern 2014
17
Segal, D. A. (2000). " Western Civ" and the Staging of History in American
Higher Education. The American Historical Review, 105(3), 770-805.
Shaw, B. D. (2003). A peculiar island: Maghrib and Mediterranean.
Mediterranean Historical Review, 18(2), 93-125.
Shea, J. J. (2003). The Middle Paleolithic of the East Mediterranean Levant.
Journal of World Prehistory, 17(4), 313-394.
Sherratt, A. (2007). Diverse origins: regional contributions to the genesis of
farming. In Colledge, S., Connelly, J. (Eds.) The Origin and Spread of Domestic
Plants in South West Asia and Europe. Pp 1-20.
Sherratt, S. (2005). Ethnicities, ethnonyms and archaeological labels. Whose
ideologies and whose identities?. Archaeological perspectives in the
transmission and transformation of culture in the Eastern Mediterranean.
Oxford: Council for British Research in the Levant and Oxbow Books, 25-38.
Skeates, R. (2005). Museum archaeology and the Mediterranean cultural
heritage. In Blake, E., Knapp, A. (Eds.). The Archaeology of Mediterranean
Prehistory, 303-320.
Talalay, L. E. (2000). Archaeological Ms. conceptions: contemplating gender
and the Greek Neolithic. Representations of Gender from Prehistory to the
Present, 3-16.
Tringham, R. (2003). (Re)-digging the site at the end of the twentieth century:
large-scale archaeological fieldwork in a new millennium. In Theory and
Practice in Mediterranean Archaeology: Old World and New World
Perspectives. Cotsen Advanced Seminars (Vol. 1, pp. 89-108).
van Binsbergen, W. M. (Ed.). (1997). Black Athena: Ten Years After. Dutch
Archaeological and Historical Society.
Paddy Altern 2014
18
Van der Auwera, S. (2012). Contemporary Conflict, Nationalism, and the
Destruction of Cultural Property During Armed Conflict: A Theoretical
Framework. Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 7(1), 49-65.
Van Dommelen, P. (2012). Colonialism and Migration in the Ancient
Mediterranean. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 393-409.
Wengrow, D. (2010). What Makes Civilization?: The Ancient Near East and the
Future of the West. Oxford University Press.
Woodward, J. (Ed.). (2009). The physical geography of the Mediterranean.
Oxford University Press.
Yahya, A. (2005). In E. Blake, & AB Knapp (Eds.) The Archaeology of
Mediterranean Prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Zilhão, J., Angelucci, D. E., Badal-García, E., d’Errico, F., Daniel, F., Dayet, L., ...
& Zapata, J. (2010). Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by
Iberian Neandertals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(3),
1023-1028.