Post on 11-Apr-2023
1
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN READING TEXT WITH FAMILIAR AND UNFAMILIAR TOPIC AND STUDENTS’
COMPREHENSION (A CASE STUDY AT SMK COMPUTER MUTIARA ILMU
MAKASSAR)
HUBUNGAN ANTARA TEKS DENGAN TOPIK YANG FAMILIAR DAN YANG TIDAK FAMILIAR DAN PEMAHAMAN
MEMBACA SISWA (STUDI KASUS DI SMK COMPUTER MUTIARA ILMU
MAKASSAR)
BESSE HARDIANTI
P0600215024
ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDY PROGRAM FACULTY OF CULTURAL SCIENCES
POST GRADUATE PROGRAM HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY
2017
ii
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN READING TEXT WITH FAMILIAR AND UNFAMILIAR TOPIC AND STUDENTS’
COMPREHENSION (A CASE STUDY AT SMK COMPUTER MUTIARA ILMU
MAKASSAR)
HUBUNGAN ANTARA TEKS DENGAN TOPIK YANG FAMILIAR DAN YANG TIDAK FAMILIAR DAN PEMAHAMAN MEMBACA SISWA
(STUDI KASUS DI SMK COMPUTER MUTIARA ILMU MAKASSAR)
T h e s i s
Submitted as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Magister Degree
in English Language Studies Program
Written and submitted by :
BESSE HARDIANTI
P0600215024
To
ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDY PROGRAM FACULTY OF CULTURAL SCIENCES
POST GRADUATE PROGRAM HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY
2017
iv
PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN TESIS
Yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini:
Nama : Besse Hardianti
Nomor pokok Mahasiswa : P0600215024
Program Studi : Bahasa Inggris
Menyatakan dengan sebenar-benarnya bahwa tesis yang saya tulis ini
benar-benar merupakan hasil karya saya sendiri, bukan merupakan
penganbilan tulisan atau pemikiran orang lain. Apabila kemudian hari
terbukti atau dapat dibuktikan bahwa sebagian atau keseluruhan tesis ini
adalah karya orang lain, saya bersedia menerima sanksi atas perbuatan
saya.
Makassar, 12 Agustus 2017
Yang menyatakan,
Besse Hardianti
v
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The long journey of this study would not have been completed
without the bless from the almighty Allah SWT and from the people who
have provided the writer with guidance, advice, support as well as
supervision. I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation to Dr. Abidin
Pammu, M.A. Dipl. TESOL, the main supervisor, for his valuable
feedback during the writing of the thesis. I also would like to convey my
most sincere gratitude to Dr. H. Fathu Rahman, M. Hum., my co-
supervisor who has provided me with substantial academic direction
during my hard time at ELS program. His constant concern and attention
provides me with resistance to complete this study at the English language
Study Program at Hasanuddin University.
My deep appreciation also goes to the three examiners, Dr. H.
Mustafa Makka, M. S., Dra. Nasmilah, M. Hum., and Dr. H. Sudarmin
Harun, M. Hum. For their feedback, corrections, as well as constructive
criticism to provide further improvement of the thesis. I would like to
express my thankfulness to my classmates in ELS 2015 who have
provided me with useful insights and suggestions as well as useful
references to complete the thesis.
vi
Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere
and profound gratitude to the most valuable people in my life, my beloved
parents, Hj. St. Rohana and the late Ambo Lolo for their endless pray for
my success. The last but not least, I would like to pass my special thanks
to my husband, Muhammad Sukarno and my daughter, Besse Nurul
Fatin for their patience and love during the writing of the thesis.
Makassar, 1 July 2017
Besse Hardianti
vii
ABSTRACT
BESSE HARDIANTI. The Relationship between Reading Text with Familiar and Unfamiliar Topic and Students’ Comprehension: A Case Study at SMK Computer Mutiara Ilmu Makassar (Supervised by Abidin Pammu and Fathu Rahman).
The aims of this research were (1) to found out the relationship between familiar and unfamiliar topic and the students’ reading comprehension and (2) to determined how text familiarity and unfamiliarity affected the students’ reading comprehension on those expository texts as complex cognitive process.
The method was a qualitative and quantitative research method. The primary data were from direct observation, in depth interview, field notes, and as results of reading tests performed directly to the samples of 5 selected samples from SMK Computer Mutiara Ilmu Makassar. Supplementary data were from open-ended questionnaire. The determination of familiar and unfamiliar texts was performed by means of topics delivery, and familiarity and unfamiliarity were indicated from 16 sample topics presented. The level of difficulty of the text used from the study was carefully considered. The data were analyzed by means of descriptive qualitative based on interpretative research paradigm.
The results of this research showed that text familiarity and unfamiliarity were determined by their prevalence, their frequency of exposure in written and electronic media and degree of reading experience by the individual. The findings confirmed positive effect of familiar topic on the reading test results in almost all the samples. The five samples exhibited a relatively high score on the correct answers from the total 10 questions. In addition, unfamiliar topic seemed to provide more destructive effects rather than detrimental effect where almost all samples exhibited unsatisfactory results on reading text with unfamiliar ones. The reason for the differences was in reference to cognitive explanations where strategies and prior knowledge play the roles.
Key words: Relationship; familiarity; unfamiliarity; reading text; comprehension
viii
ABSTRAK
BESSE HARDIANTI. Hubungan antara Teks Bacaan dengan Topik yang Familiar dan yang Tidak Familiar dan Pemahaman Membaca Siswa: Studi Kasus di SMK Komputer Mutiara Ilmu Makassar (Dibimbing oleh Abidin Pammu dan Fathu Rahman). Penelitian ini bertujuan (1) menemukan hubungan antara topik yang familiar dan tidak familiar, serta pemahaman membaca siswa; dan (2) menentukan pengaruh keakraban dan ketidakakraban teks terhadap pemahaman membaca siswa sebagai proses kognitif yang kompleks terhadap kinerja tersebut. Metode penelitian adalah metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Data primer diperoleh berdasarkan pengamatan langsung, wawancara mendalam, catatan lapangan, dan hasil tes baca yang dilakukan langsung pada kelima sampel terpilih di SMK Komputer Mutiara ilmu Makassar. Data tambahan berasal dari tanggapan tertulis sampel menggunakan kuesioner terbuka. Penentuan teks yang akrab dan tidak akrab dilakukan dengan melihat pilihan para sampel dari enam belas contoh topic yang disajikan. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif berdasarkan paradigma penelitian interpretatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keakraban dan ketidakakraban teks ditentukan oleh prevalensinya, frekuensi keterpaparannya dalam media tertulis dan elektronik, serta tingkat pengalaman membaca secara individu. Temuan tersebut mengkonfirmasi efek positif dari topik yang familiar pada hasil tes baca di hampir semua sampel. Kelima sampel tersebut menunjukkan skor yang relatif tinggi terhadap jawaban yang benar dari sepuluh pertanyaan. Selain itu, ketidakakraban terhadap topik tampaknya memberi efek yang lebih destruktif, yakni hampir semua sampel menunjukkan hasil yang tidak memuaskan pada teks bacaan yang tidak mereka kenal. Alasan perbedaannya mengacu pada penjelasan kognitif, yakni strategi dan pengetahuan sebelumnya memainkan peran. Kata kunci: Hubungan; keakraban; ketidakakraban; membaca teks; pemahaman
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page ................................................................................................... i
Submission Sheet .................................................................................... ii
Approval Sheet ........................................................................................ iii
Pernyataan Keaslian Tesis ..................................................................... iv
Acknowledgement .................................................................................. v
Abstract .................................................................................................. vii
Abstrak .................................................................................................. viii
Table of Contents .................................................................................... ix
List of Tables ........................................................................................... xi
List Of Figures ........................................................................................ xii
List Of Abbreviation .............................................................................. xiii
List Of Appendices .............................................................................. xiv
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1
A. Background ...................................................................................... 1
B. Research Questions ....................................................................... 11
C. Objectives of The Research ........................................................... 12
D. Significance of The Research ........................................................ 12
E. The Scope of The Research .......................................................... 13
F. Organization of The Paper ............................................................ 14
G. Research Terms ............................................................................ 14
x
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE ................................................ 17
A. Previous Related Studies ............................................................... 17
B. Theoretical Background ................................................................. 24
C. Conceptual Framework .................................................................. 45
D. Operational Definition .…………………………………..….….…….. 45
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ........................................ 47
A. Research Design ........................................................................... 48
B. Subject of the Research …………..……….….……………………. 50
C. Research Instruments…………………………..….………………….51
D. Sampling Techniques ……………………………………………….. 54
E. Determination of Familiar & Unfamiliar Topic…………….…………54
F. Data Collection Procedure…………………………...…………….…55
G. Data Analysis Techniques…………………………………………….56
CHAPTER IV: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION …...……….……………. 57
A. Finding ………………………..…...…………………………………….57
B. Discussion… ….………………………………………………...……....72
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ………………..…...86
A. Conclusion ….. ………………………………………………………...86
B. Suggestion ……,.………………………………………………....……...87
BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................... 89
APPENDICES
xi
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. Distribution of Topics and Subject Response Learner 1 58
2. Distribution of Topics and Subject Response Learner 2 60
3. Distribution of Topics and Subject Response Learner 3 62
4. Distribution of Topics and Subject Response Learner 4 63
5. Distribution of Topics and Subject Response Learner 5 65
6. Distribution of Familiar & Unfamiliar Topics 67
7. Test Results of reading with Familiar Topics 69
8. Test Results of Reading with Unfamiliar Topics 71
9. Effect of Familiar and Unfamiliar Topic 83
xiii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
1. EFL English as Foreign Language 2
2. ESL English Second Language 2
3. L2 Second Language 2
4. RCS Reading Comprehension Strategies 3
5. LGBT Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender 60
6. PDST Professional Development Service for Teacher 31
xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES
Number
1. List of Topics
2. The Visual Basic Programming
3. The Incredible Flea
4. Open ended Questionnaires
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the background study and the problem
statement, such as the status of English as a foreign language in
Indonesia and the context of reading as a core component within the
national curriculum. This part also addresses the research questions,
objectives of the research, the significance of the research, scope of the
research, research terms, and organization of the paper.
A. Background
Over the years, teaching and learning of English Language can be
considered to be an integral part of Indonesia educational system for a
long time to now (Mappiasse & Sihes , 2014: 114). The status of English
in Indonesia is well documented in the state decree number 096/1967 of
the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. This
status clearly defines English as a foreign language and as a compulsory
subject within the curriculum from secondary schools to tertiary levels
throughout the country. For over more than two decades from 1950 to
1975, the objective of teaching English has been to enhance reading skills
for dealing with English academic text. As core content within the national
curriculum, English contents included other skills, such as listening,
speaking, writing, and with still greater emphasis on reading in year 1984
2
up to 1994. A shift of content orientation underwent slight changes with
moderate emphasis on communication and writing at both curriculum year
2004 and 2006 (Minister of Education and Culture, 2012).
English also gives access to the latest ideas and opportunities to
enhance professional credibility through participation in international
meetings, forum, and partnership. In this respect, distance seems to be no
longer a serious handicap as if countries constantly come closer to each
other. In addition, advancement in technology has enabled the people to
enter different countries and come home for dinner in the same day. In this
context, different nations will be able to establish a good relationship that
is only possible if countries share one language for communication. It is
commonly known that that communication offers us an opportunity to
engage in cultural interaction that will enrich the culture in more global
sense. Reading necessity does not only prevail within EFL setting such as
Indonesia but also in ESL context.
From among the four language skills, namely such as reading,
writing, speaking, and listening. Reading comprehension is considered to
be the most important skill, especially for L2 learners. This skill was so
important to language learning and teaching that by the end of the first
quarter of the twentieth century an approach named the “reading
approach” emerged which underlined reading as a tool for language
learning and emphasized reading skills for foreign languages (Brown,
2000). The importance of reading is proven by the emerging needs of EFL
3
learners willing to pursue better education overseas. They have to deal
with a lot of readings in English that requires strategies to comprehend
those texts. Often the learners are prevented from the opportunities to go
abroad because they did not fulfill the standard of TOEFL score required
by the university overseas.
In an EFL context such as Indonesia, reading is considered to be
one of the most important language skills to be acquired because of lack
of enough exposure to the spoken form of the target language. Zhang
(2001:175), stated that Reading in Indonesia context is not only essential
in the comprehension of textbooks but also essential to perform
professional jobs, such as doing translation because there are too many
university or undergraduate students are not able to read. This is probably
one of the main reasons that the government is trying to integrate Reading
subject into the curriculum starting from secondary school to tertiary level.
Reading is a major academic skill that is introduced to students
during the early school years. Therefore reading instruction should prepare
students to interact in a meaningful manner with a variety of texts. Good
readers focus their attention on the major ideas as they incorporate the
metacognitive skills needed to accomplish the task of understanding text.
Consequently, good readers are strategic readers who have developed
the necessary skills to benefit fully from the decoding process of reading.
That is why reading comprehension strategies (RCS) have been given
ample attention in research on language learning strategies. Koda (2005:)
4
believes that skillful readers continuously adjust their reading behaviors to
cope with the text difficulty, task demands, and other contextual variables.
They monitor their reading process carefully and take immediate steps
when encountering comprehension problems. They are aware of their own
cognitive and linguistic resources and are capable of directing their
attention to the appropriate clues in the texts. These and similar behaviors
which separate skilled from less-skilled readers are called strategic
reading.
The imposition of Reading as a core subject within the secondary
school curriculum implies that reading is an important skill for all learners
regardless of their educational and social background. In Indonesia, the
main objective of English language education is to promote discourse
competence (i.e., students’ communicative ability, both in oral and written
language in any communicative events). In order to achieve the goal,
learners also have to learn other competences: actional competence,
linguistic competence, socio-linguistic competence, and strategic
competence. Thus, discourse competence is the final goal oflanguage
learning while the other competences are treated as the supportive
competences but should be firstly acquired (Depdiknas, 2004). The
imposition of reading may benefit the students in all level of education
because the current curriculum does not seem to provide sufficient skills to
deal with the demands of literacy skills. The ability to comprehend
textbooks in English has been the main concern of Indonesian educators
5
and teaching professionals. They often urge the government especially the
Department of Education and Culture to make revision of the curriculum.
English as a foreign language aims to equip the learners with
decent communication as well as literacy skills in order to be able to
pursue further education overseas. However, proficiency in English is
difficult to achieve because English is not the official language of the
country and is only in use within school instruction under the English
subject and exposure to the target language is relatively rare outside
classroom setting. This condition has made it difficult for EFL learners in
Indonesia to make sufficient practice required for the language proficiency.
Besides, the learners from all level of education in this country needs other
skills, such as speaking in order to deal with the global demands. The
global demands require that people from all over the world understand
spoken English because it has been the major language used in
international events, such as conferences, seminars and workshops.
At present, the Indonesian government demands its people to
acquire high standard of English in reading. The government has become
well aware of the need of literacy skills to establish political and economic
engagement with other countries. More recently, the government of
Indonesia through the Department of Education and Culture has urged its
people all over the country to improve their literacy skills in order to be
able to challenge the dynamic development of globalization era.
Meanswhile, Whitehead (2008) confirms that this mission is relevant to the
6
need of language proficiency as an essential condition for its people in
order to gain resistant survival in this fast changing society. This mission is
relevant to the need of language proficiency as an essential condition for
its people in order to gain resistant survival in this fast changing society.
Whitehead (2008) confirms that in large part of the world, the use of
English creates a space that enables communication and debates to take
place.
The vitality of the language skills and its importance in the world of
global economy is apparent in a scholar’s statement. Richards (2008)
argues that one of the simple facts of life in the present time is that the
English language skills of a good proportion of its citizenry are seen as
vital if a country is to participate actively in the global economy and to have
access to the information and knowledge that provide the basis for both
social and economic development. He convinces that central to this
enterprise are English teaching and English language teacher education.
However, the learning and teaching of English in Indonesian tertiary
education has faced some challenges. More and more tertiary learners
find it difficult to read and understand academic text in their respective
subject disciplines. Recent investigation of the reading behaviour of EFL
learners in Indonesia demonstrated that their main motivation to read was
for fulfilling the assignment (Erna, 2012:3).
The apparent under performance of tertiary learners has raised
questions about current development of teaching and learning a foreign
7
language in Indonesia. The development of language teaching does not
seem to provide significant impact on the improvement of learners’ poor
standard of EFL performance particularly in reading skills. There has been
strong perception among teaching practitioners, teachers, and educators
regarding poor standard of English achievement at all levels of education
(Syatriana, 1998; Hamra, 1996; Kweldju, 2001). They claimed that most
university graduates are not able to read with full comprehension. Such
perception is also justified through the profile of many tertiary graduates
who could not meet the TOEFL score of 500 and above in the admission
test for the postgraduates studies at Hasanudin University. The learners’
failure to achieve the TOEFL band score provides a clear outlook that a
large majority of university graduates have poor performance on reading
skills. As Lie (2007) claims that even though English is officially taught
through the country from secondary schools to tertiary levels, competence
in the English language among learners at both schools and universities is
generally low.
Successful comprehension monitoring requires the detection of
unknown or inconsistent information and an awareness of strategies that
can be utilized to alleviate the problem. Effective readers are able to
monitor their own comprehension and take the necessary steps to cope
successfully with difficulties encountered in comprehending text. The
public perception of Indonesia scholars and researchers show that the
majority of Indonesia students are not even able to comprehend textbooks
8
in almost all disciplines. They often claim that the failure of teaching
English in Indonesia context is due to the lack of teacher training and the
complexity of geographical conditions that make it difficult for the
government to provide such needs. It is even difficult for the government to
establish standard of curriculum suitable for Indonesian context with
diverse cultural and social background.
The students’ attitudes toward reading can influence achievement.
The parents play a major role in promoting and sustaining children's
enthusiasm for reading. Regularly, children observe their parents and
other individuals reading. Therefore by observing their parents and others
interacting with print, children learn that reading and writing have
functional environmental uses (Brown, 2000 and Briggs, 1987). The
children easily ascertain the attitude that others have toward reading and
the importance of reading in daily life. Over a period of time, students have
gradually assimilated their attitudes toward reading from the actions and
beliefs of those with whom they regularly come in contact (Briggs, 1987).
Students who develop positive attitudes toward the value of reading will
approach reading instruction with a greater possibility for success.
Extensive research has been conducted on the teacher's influence in
helping to foster students’ attitudes toward reading. Schofield (1980) found
that teachers who value reading tend to promote positive attitudes and
higher achievement among their students. Obviously, when learning to
read, children are also developing attitudes toward reading and their own
9
reading proficiency. Children are also affected by the instructional behavior
of their teachers.
Allington (1980), discovered that teacher-pupil interaction was
different for good and poor readers. He found that teachers are more likely
to interrupt poor readers who err when reading aloud than good readers
who err similarly. As a result, the actual instructional time allocated for
reading tasks is much less for the poor readers. In general, research (e.g.,
Kennedy & Halinski, 1978), has shown that good readers have a more
positive attitude toward reading than poor readers do. The poor attitude of
disabled readers may have a negative effect on reading achievement.
High interest in reading tends to be associated with high achievement, and
low interest in reading tends to be associated with failure in reading. The
failure in reading therefore must have relevance with the quality of
teachers, insufficient infrastructures, and professionalism. Reading must
be integrated with all sectors of education and as such teacher training is
important to deal with such problem.
An Indonesian researcher, such as Artsiyanti (2010) mentioned that
in Indonesia, most of the students got some problems in mastering English
language. Firstly, teachers rarely speak English in the classroom. The
second, Lessons are emphasized on grammar (and not in conversation),
but students are rarely given direction such as how and what the functions
of the grammatical elements that they are learning. Third, the
Vocabularies, which given by teachers ware not very useful in daily
10
conversations. The last, the material of English lesson in junior high school
and high school was unsustainable. The students stated that there was a
repetition of the material (such as tenses) that had been taught at junior
high school, but the functions and applications were unclear enough.
Some of above problems, commonly found by all students in Indonesia,
the English language became important to learn but it is rather difficult for
students to learn especially junior high school students even in senior high
school or vocational school English language becomes a test of
determining their graduation.
The vitality of reading also applies for vocational secondary school
in South Sulawesi Province. An example of this is the vocational high
school of computer students of Makassar who are required to read the
written text of English language. This is because there is a lot of
information and knowledge about computers written in English. The public
have perceived that the students' performance in reading skill is still
unsatisfactory. The students of Computer Department in “SMK Computer
Mutiara Ilmu Makassar are regarded to have very poor reading ability and
they possess very little interest in English reading text. The vocational
school need to be the object of research and investigation in order to find
the existing problems that may inhibit the attainment of goals stipulated in
such institution. Researchers and educational practitioners in this region
need to consider improvement of vocational education in order to provide
better education for all people regardless their social and economic
11
background. The result of research may be useful at the institution and
therefore the students’ literacy skills could be improved.
In this case the researcher was investigate whether reading text
with familiar and unfamiliar topic affect their comprehension over the
English expository text. This is crucial for such institution because
Computer Department will deal a lot of text written in English. Basically, if
students read a lot of English texts, they will get more language input from
the reading activity. Students can also enrich their vocabularies that can
help them understand the science of computer. Finally, the students of
computer school need the reading skill in English in order to equip them
with knowledge on computer as demanded by the school. The integrating
theory and practice in order to improve the students’ reading performance
to enable them pursue education not only at tertiary level in their own
country but also pursue education overseas.
B. Research Questions
The present study attempts to explore whether students’ familiarity
and unfamiliarity over the topic of particular English text bridges
comprehension. Therefore, the following are formulated as research
questions (RQ).
1. What is the relationship between familiar and unfamiliar textual topic
and students’ comprehension at vocational high school of Computer
Mutiara Ilmu Makassar?
12
2. How do topic familiarity and unfamiliarity affect students’
comprehension at vocational High School of Computer Mutiara Ilmu
Makassar?
C. Objectives of The Research
The main objectives of the research is to find out the profiles of
students’ reading comprehension ability in the two types of text, familiar
and unfamiliar topic, so that conclusion can be made in which aspect of
reading the teacher can be recommended to improve their teaching
performance that leads to students’ improvement in reading. In particular,
the objective of current research are formulated as follows:
1. To explore whether there is a relationship between familiarity and
unfamiliarity of textual topic and students’ comprehension of students
of vocational high school of computer Mutiara Ilmu Makassar.
2. To elaborate arguments as to why text familiarity or unfamiliarity affect
students’ comprehension over the text.
D. Significance Of The Research
The present study deals with the relationship between topic
familiarity and unfamiliarity and students’ comprehension. The research
will have significant contribution to the development of research in EFL
reading in Indonesian context in general and in South Sulawesi Province
in particular. The finding from this research will add the existing literature
13
regarding roles of text genre towards text comprehension. At least, the
present research contributes to the development of research in EFL
context in Indonesia so that it can bridge the research and classroom
pedagogical practices. The present research is expected to bring a
positive teaching implication to improve students’ reading skills at the
institution where the research is undertaken. Finally, the research will
benefit both teachers and students in terms of teaching and learning
improvement to enable them (students) comprehend textbooks in various
disciplines. At least, teachers from this institution can learn from the
research to improve their teaching methodologies in reading to enable
their students pursue education at higher level.
E. The Scope of the Research
The focus of the present study is the relationship between familiar
and unfamiliar topic of the English texts and students’ comprehension. The
concept of familiarity and unfamiliarity will be based on the subject
perception over the expository text that will be selected for this study. The
familiarity of text may derive from lexical item already possessed by
students during the data collection process. The familiarity may also derive
from students’ better awareness due to their experience in reading an
English text. The subject familiarity and unfamiliarity will be crosschecked
with their level of comprehension on the given English text. Finally,
14
familiarity over the text may also derive from available reading strategies
used to assess the text.
F. Organization of the Chapters
In this paper consists of three chapters. Chapter One comprises the
background, problem statement, objective of the research, significance of
the research, scope of the research, and organization of the paper and
research terms. Chapter Two consists of literature review that consist of
previous research and theoretical background (reading skill and schema
theory). Chapter Three includes research design, research instruments,
technique of data collection, and technique of data analysis.
G. Research Terms
1. Reading comprehension is the process of constructing meaning is
the process in which the reader combines their prior knowledge with
the additional information from a text, draw the meaning of words, and
connect it to reach the clear understanding of 8 9 the written text
(Pang, et al., 2003:14).
2. Familiar is something or someone is easy to recognize because of
being seen, met, heard, etc. before. We can say that we know about
something or someone well. (Cambridge Advanced Learner’s
Dictionary & Thesaurus).
15
3. Familiarity is a measure of how frequently a linguistic item is thought
to be used, or the degree to which it is known. This may be measured
by asking people to show on a RATING SCALE whether they think
they use a given word or structure never, sometimes, or often. Word
familiarity has been used as a way of selecting vocabulary for
language teaching. (Richards Jack C and Schmidt Richard,2002: 198).
4. Topic is in language teaching, a curriculum, course or syllabus in
which content and teaching and learning activities are centered around
topics or themes, such as family, leisure, music, etc. Other aspects of
the course (skills, grammar, etc.) are all linked to the core topics of
the course. (Richards Jack C and Schmidt Richard, 2002: 198). In this
study, the writer focus on topic in reading skill.
5. Schema Theory is The theory that in comprehending language
people activate relevant schemata allowing them to process and
interpret new experiences quickly and efficiently. Schemata serve as a
reference store from which a person can retrieve relevant existing
knowledge and into which new information is assimilated. When
encountering a topic in reading or listening, the reader activates the
schema for that topic and makes use of it to anticipate, infer, and
make different kinds of judgments and decisions about it. Schema
theory plays an important role in theories of second language reading
and listening comprehension. (Richards Jack C and Schmidt Richard,
2002). Then they continuous, they consist in two types of schema
16
theory that are: 1).content schemata and 2). Formal schemata. A
difference is sometimes made between content schemata and
formal schemata. Content schemata deal with general background
knowledge related to the topic such as might be associated with the
topic of an earthquake. Formal schemata deal with the rhetorical
structure of language and a person’s knowledge of the structure of a
particular genre, such as news reports or journal articles.
17
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
This chapter addresses fundamental information regarding previous
research that have been conducted in relation to the topic of the research.
This part clearly shows the gaps that make the present research is
different from the previous research. It also deals with theoretical
discussion that addresses the background information regarding familiar
and unfamiliar topic of reading. In addition, it also addresses the whole
conception about familiar and unfamiliar topic based on experts and
researcher. Every part sums up the whole ideas that will clearly show the
core component of each sub titles.
A. Previous Related Studies
There has been an overwhelming of research already done in
relation to topic familiarity and unfamiliarity and students comprehension..
These studies have already provided significant implication on the
teaching of Reading subject in various EFL contexts notably in Indonesia.
Despite the massive development of research on this issue,
researchers all over the world are still exploring the arguments as to why
relationship between familiarity and unfamiliarity of text topic contribute to
comprehension. Therefore, the present study attempts to fill the gap and
explore the role of familiar topic in L2 reading. However, most of the
research centers on the discussion of reading difficulty and reading
18
strategies. Little attention has been paid to reading especially in relation to
text familiarity. Therefore, the present study attempts to fill the gap and
explore the role of text familiarity in L2/EFL reading. The present research
presents those research findings so that researchers have the scenario
about segment of reading that needs to further explored and investigated.
Chang (2006) investigated the effects of topic familiarity and
linguistic difficulty on the reading strategies and mental representations of
nonnative readers of Chinese. The research design employed a qualitative
research design because the researcher intended to reveal the holistic and
deep information about Chinese students in handling familiar topic. The
results suggest that subjects in all four groups predominantly engaged in
local-level processing with the exception of two types of global-level
processing: monitoring one’s comprehension and generation of inferences.
While monitoring efforts were motivated by both topic familiarity and
linguistic difficulty, inferencing events were primarily facilitated by topic
familiarity. In addition, topic familiarity was also found to have a facilitative
effect on the mental representations of the reading passages whereas no
effects due to linguistic difficulty was found.
Another important research about topic familiarity is by Chansri
(2008) who included gender perspectives. In this research, Chansri
(2008) investigated the relationship between topic familiarity, gender
differences, vocabulary, and English reading comprehension of students at
the university level in Thailand. By utilizing questionnaires and interviews
19
as the research instrument, he came up with the finding that showed
positive relationship between the reading comprehension test of familiar
and unfamiliar topics and on the vocabulary test. In addition, the
participants also obtained a higher mean score on the topics that were
familiar to them than on the topics that were not familiar to them,
regardless of gender. This research confirmed that female participants
performed better than the mean score of the male participants on female-
related topics. On the reading comprehension test of familiar and
unfamiliar topics, the male participants obtained better score than the
mean score of the female participants on male-related topics. This
research confirmed that gender related readers helped in enhancing
comprehension.
Cultural context has also been under investigation on research
regarding familiar and unfamiliar topic. In this context, Erten and Razi
(2009) conducted research about “The effects of cultural familiarity on
reading comprehension”. The result of this study concluded that firstly,
cultural familiarity facilitates comprehension. Secondly, although reading
activities do activate schematic knowledge and promote strategic reading
behaviors, the influence of cultural familiarity still needed. Therefore, if
readers lack the relevant cultural schema, reading activities cannot fully
compensate for the discrepancy or help readers comprehend a text.
Research focusing on content familiarity of text has also been done
in the context of English as a foreign language in a Spanish institution.
20
Martínez (2014), for example, conducted her research on the analysis of
the effect of content familiarity and gender on English as a foreign
language reading comprehension with Spanish University Students. The
result of the study showed that gender and content familiarity significantly
affected the students' overall comprehension of the texts. This study
showed that the linguistic threshold hypothesis as both the elementary
level and intermediate level readers of the study could read and
understand better when the text was familiar, irrespective of their language
knowledge and also it seems to support the interactive view of L2 reading
comprehension.
A more recent investigation of the relationship between topic
familiarity and comprehension has been under documentation in another
context of English as a foreign language. Yu-Jiao (2014), for example,
conducted a research on the effect of topic familiarity on L2 Incidental
vocabulary acquisition (IVA) in reading- an experimental study based on
path analysis”. This research explores the relationship between topic
familiarity, reading comprehension and L2 incidental vocabulary
acquisition with the help of path analysis SPSS 17.0. The result of this
research showed that topic familiarity has a significant influence on
reading performance and reading performance has a significant effect on
vocabulary learning and then topic familiarity has an indirect influence on
incidental vocabulary acquisition. The research confirmed that the
acquisition of vocabulary may occur through topic familiarity.
21
A more dynamic investigation of the relationship between topic
familiarity and comprehension has been under investigation with the
involvement of test taking strategies. Lee (2011), conducted research on
second language reading topic familiarity and test score: test-taking
strategies for multiple-choice comprehension questions. The substance of
the study refers to describing what students do when they are taking
reading comprehension tests by asking students to verbalize their
thoughts. The research came up with the finding that the strategies used
by participants in the test-taking situation to process text were similar
regardless of topic familiarity. Besides that this study contributed toward
L2 reading assessment by presenting the test-taking strategies in regard
to different topic familiarity and by demonstrating the validity of multiple-
choice reading tests.
Research involving pre-reading activity and topic familiarity has also
been under investigation in the field of reading research. Rouhi A. &
Asghari F. (2011) conducted a research on the effect of topic familiarity
and pre-reading activities on reading comprehension and lexical
inferencing”. A review of the research literature indicated that superiority
of +F–P group over the –F+P group in terms of both reading
comprehension and lexical inferencing tests further implied that providing
readers with pre-reading activities on an unfamiliar topic could barely
make up for the lack of topic familiarity in either reading comprehension or
lexical inferencing.
22
Investigation of topic familiarity and gender perspective has been
performed in the context of English as a foreign language. Jalilehvand et
al (2014) conducted a study an content familiarity and gender-neutral texts
in foreign language reading comprehension. The result from this study
was a two-way interaction effect between familiarity and gender. It was
found that females scored higher on familiar texts whereas males
outperformed the females on the unfamiliar texts. The study confirmed that
gender differences contribute to students’ performance in reading
comprehension. There was no account reported as to why females
outperformed the males in that context. One could be the main reason was
probably due to reading experience where males have more exposure to
reading text before the research was conducted.
The most recent development of reading research involving topic
familiarity has been performed in the context of English as a foreign
language. Mahmoudi & Mahmoudi (2017), conducted a study entitled,
“Can Topic Familiarity Override Language Proficiency in Reading
Comprehension?”. The obtained results indicated that topic familiarity
cannot override language proficiency in reading comprehension; that is,
low-proficiency students could not catch up with high proficiency students
even in familiar topics. The research confirmed that proficiency in the
language had stronger implication to understand text than familiarity of the
topic.
23
Based on the research perspective involving topic familiarity and
comprehension, researcher from all over the world are convinced about
the effectiveness of text familiarity and comprehension. As mentioned in
the previous research, there has been a positive relation between topic
familiarity and students’ comprehension and thus these studies will have
significant teaching implication both in the context of English as a second
language and as a foreign language. In addition, some researchers
believe that there is correlation between familiar topic, schema theory,
gender, and vocabulary in reading comprehension. Despite a range of
studies that have been performed, little has been addressed regarding
what types of text genres contribute to comprehension.
In order to contextualize the research on reading particularly in
relation to text familiarity and comprehension, the present study explores
the relationship between text familiarity, unfamiliarity, and students’
comprehension. The focus of the present study is on the vocational
secondary school located in Makassar as the capital of the province of
South Sulawesi. The setting will be on SMK Computer Mutiara Ilmu
because the institution also impose the subject of Reading as a core
component in the curriculum. The study is expected to contribute to the
development of research on the field of reading particularly in relation to
text familiarity.
24
B. Theoretical Background
1. Concept of Reading
a. Definition Reading
Experts in the field of language teaching and learning have
provided a wide range of reading definitions. Most available definitions are
based on the concept of reading that derive from both top-down and
bottom-up process of reading. Therefore, the meanings are often identical
because these definitions relate to the concept of reading as cognitive
process. The following definitions of reading are based on the notion of
reading as cognitive process, which take into account the process of
information transfer.
Reading is a process of manipulating phoneme-grapheme
relationships as described by a structural linguist Leonard Bloomfield
(Dubin & Bycina, 1991). The bottom-up model of reading, basically,
fostered practices in reading instruction which built up learners decoding
abilities from the bottom up, starting with the smallest units, single letters,
letters blends , and building up to words and phrases. With the emergence
of the more recent model, that is, the top-down model, this model of
reading which viewed that reading takes place by matching sounds and
letters became outdated
Anderson (1999) stated that reading is as an interactive, fluent
process which involves the reader and the text in building comprehension
of meaning. Such interactive processing also implies the interaction
25
between reader and text. Recently, researchers view the reading
comprehension process as an interaction between the reader’s
background knowledge and text. Schema theorists have examined the
importance of background knowledge in the system called bottom-up and
top-down processing in order to facilitate reading comprehension.
Reading is an indirect communication between the author and the
reader, using the linguistic symbol and the prior knowledge by reader has
had to produce reading comprehension. From the previous conception of
reading, it may be understood that reading is a complex process which
involves the coordination of a multitude of skills. Strategic readers can be
distinguished from the less-skilled readers by their methods of interacting
with text. The mental processes of good readers must be understood in
order to make assumptions concerning the nature of reading.
b. Definition of Reading Comprehension
Reading comprehension processes was one of the goal of self-
reading skills. According to Tankersley ( 2003: 90 ) stated that in reading
comprehension, there are three factors which influence the level of
reader’s comprehension among other things, the first factor is the reader
has command of the linguistic structures of the text. The second factor is
the reader is able to monitor and reflect his or her own level of
understanding while reading the material. And The third factor and most
important criterian influencing the comprehension is the reader has
adequate background in the content and vocabulary being presented.
26
Elizabeth (2003:15) stated that comprehension is the process of
deriving meaning from connected text. It involves word knowledge
(vocabulary) as well as thinking and reasoning. It means that Indeed the
reader's understanding in reading foreign language text is not based on
the content of his writing but the knowledge, they have already had it.
According to Research and Development (RAND) Reading Study Group
(RRSG, 2002) in Snow (2010) stated that the process of simultaneously
constructing and extracting meaning through interaction and engagement
with print. As addition, Watter Kerrin, et al. (2016:3) stated that Reading
comprehension is the act of interpreting written information from a text; this
involves using prior knowledge to interfere information, making a
representation in mind about the text and its content, and then applying
this information to a new situations.
c. The psycholinguistic model toward reading for English foreign
learner
Reading process is an interactive between readers and writers
through writing text media under the control of psycholinguistics. Good
reader is the reader to understand fully what he has read. Understanding
greatly aided by reflection or thinking about what they read. Coady
mentioned that the basic of psycholinguistics in the process of
comprehension by the reader can be seen from consolidation of three
important things, namely the aspects of the reader’ background
27
knowledge Interact with the concept of the reader' ability to produce
comprehension and process strategy (Michael and Richards, 1989: 219).
we can see in figure 1.
Figure 1. Coady’s Model Of The ELS/EFL Reader
The first, the conceptual abilities refer to intellectual ability, it is the
ability needed to perform various mental activities such as thinking,
reasoning, and problems solving. Actually, Individuals need to use the
intelligence and for the right reasons for assessing or determining
something. So, it should be emphasized, that the reading skills is not only
to know the vocabulary one by one from the reading text but it also needs
to be reasoning. The second, knowledge background refers prior
knowledge by the reader. According to Coady in Michael and Richards,
(1989:220) noted that knowledge background is important variable, we
have seen many students with western knowledge background of some
kind learn English faster On average compared with those without the
background knowledge. Coady mentioned also the interest and
BACKGROUND
KNOWLEDGE
PROCESS
STRATEGIES
CONCEPTUAL
ABILITIES
28
background knowledge will bring through for the learner to understand at a
plausible rate and keep him embroiled in The material despite the
difficulties syntax. And the last, process strategy refers to actions taken to
achieve specific objectives to obtain comprehension.
d. Establishing Reading Goals
Establishing a goal for reading is a prerequisite for monitoring the
reading process and planning appropriate strategies for understanding the
text. By setting goals, students are able to generate hypotheses and
formulate expectations which will guide their reading. Anderson and
Armbruster (1982) suggested that surveying the text and determining the
goal can improve both enjoyment and comprehension. Seeing a definite
need for goals, Stauffer (1969) emphasized the importance of goal setting
in his Directed Reading-Thinking Activity. Because of setting goals,
students gain experience in structuring the specific objectives, which will
guide and aid them in reading. Reading must be goal-directed because
readers must determine strategies for utilizing texts in various ways and
must establish appropriate goals.
Once goals are formulated, students will be able to make use of
their knowledge of the topic to stimulate the background knowledge
required for comprehension.. These goals of reading either explicitly or
implicitly can influence students’ understanding of text. In general, good
readers are constantly determining reasons for reading, performing an
overview and determining the intention of the author before they begin to
29
read. Finally, setting the purpose of reading will confirm better
understanding of text. This cognitive process requires readers to depend
heavily upon their experiential background to comprehend what they are
reading. Therefore, students need to make themselves familiar with the
topic by increasing their vocabulary and reading awareness.
e. Teaching Reading Comprehension for Senior High School
In teaching English for EFL senior high schools, the students need
some strategies to comprehend the English text, so that messages
delivered by the author can be understood by the reader. Refer to
guideline English curriculum of reading comprehension for teacher
(PDST: professional development service for teacher) mentioned that in
fact the process of reading comprehension is seen instead of having
started reading. But before we read until reading resolved. As a reader
apply pre-reading for previewing text and post-reading for obtaining the
Information is needed.
In Indonesia, English for senior high lever has aim based on
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2006) is understanding students
interpersonal, ideational, and textual meanings in various written text.
Written text is in the form of descriptive, narrative, recount, procedure,
report, news item, anecdot, exposition, explanation, and discussion.
(Yuniarti, 2013:3).
Next Pardo (2004) stated that separating guideline into pre-reading,
when reading and post-reading, for the teacher can outline exercises for
30
each phase that will enhance students comprehension and furthermore
give chances to teacher to exhibit procedures that readers apply at each
stage. He mentioned also comprehension is a procedure in which readers
build up signification by socialize with text by applying the reader' prior
knowledge and past experience, the output of the text and the
establishment of the reader pick up relationship to the content of text.
English teacher should teach strategy comprehension to their students
because it is mental processes.
f. Level of Reading Comprehension
Generally, there are three level toward reading comprehension.
Basaraba et all. (2012:352) stated that there are three levels of
comprehension, namely: the first is literal. the second is Inferential and the
last Evaluative.
1) Literal Comprehension
This first level, students are required to know the vocabularies and
synthetic in the reading text and also understand the meaning presented.
According to Rupley and Blair (in Basaraba et al., 2012:352) mentioned
that literal comprehension have two strategies, namely recall and
recognition. Recall is the ability to provide an idea (e.g., main idea or
detail) that was part of passage. Recognition is the ability to recognize
whether specific information is provided in a passage.
Guideline of English curriculum of the reading comprehension for
teacher (PDST: professional development service for teacher) mentioned
31
that in the level literal comprehension of the four strategies. First, creating
images is “ to use the senses to help them to draw conclusions, make
predictions, interpret information, remember details and assist overall
comprehension”. (PDST: professional development service for teacher).
Second, skimming is “To involve glancing quickly through a text to gain a
general impression of the content. Graphics, italics and headings are
useful cues when skimming a text”. (PDST: professional development
service for teacher). Third, scanning is glancing through material to locate
specific details, such as names, dates, places or some particular content.”
(PDST: professional development service for teacher). Fourth, self
questioning is to encourage readers to constantly think of questions
before, during and after reading to assist them to comprehend text. Self-
formulated questions provide a framework for active reading and
engagement as students go in search of the answers.” (PDST:
professional development service for teacher).
2). Inferential Comprehension
Inferential comprehension is the reader comprehend for making
meaning toward text . At this level, the reader applies the information
available to predict the readings, draw conclusions and the reader can
explain the information from what he has read. so that readers can find
the attachment between the idea of reading text. make interpretations
about the author’s intended meaning and/or understand the relationships
between the elements presented in the text (Basaraba et al , 2012: 352).
32
Guideline of English curriculum of reading comprehension for
teacher (PDST: professional development service for teacher) mentioned
that in the level literal comprehension of the four strategies. First,
connecting is to comprehend text by making strong connections between
their prior knowledge and the new information presented in text. (PDST:
professional development service for teacher). Second, comparing is “
closely linked to ‘Connecting’. When making connections to the text, self,
other texts and the outside world, pupils also make comparisons. There is
an emphasis on identifying similarities and differences.” (PDST:
professional development service for teacher). Third, inferring is “the
readers to comprehend text by making strong connections between their
prior knowledge and the new information presented in the reader to move
beyond the literal text and make assumptions about what is not explicitly
stated in the text. It can involve predictions, conclusions and
interpretations that are neither confirmed nor rejected.” (PDST:
professional development service for teacher). Fourth, predicting helps
readers to activate their prior knowledge about a topic, so they begin to
combine what they know with the new material in the text. Predictions are
based on clues in the text such as pictures, illustrations, subtitles and plot.”
(Reading Booklet. PDST: professional development service for teacher).
33
3). Evaluative comprehension
In the last level, the reader is required to give criticism and explain
their understanding, so that this level is a follow up of the literal and
inferential. As applying the last level some of the action can be doing
(Reading Booklet. PDST: professional development), such as:
Synthesising is piecing information together as students read a text, to
keep track of what is happening. Next, determining the important important
information from phrase, sentence, paragraph, chapter or whole text.Then,
summarizing and paraphrasing is reducing larger texts to focus on
important elements and re-stating/re-writing text in own words using key
words to capture main focus. Finally, Self Questioning is providing a
framework for active learning as students engage with the text to find
answers.
2. The concept of Schema theory
a. Definition of Schema Theory
Actually schema theory is introduced by Frederic Bartlett (1932).
Bartlet (1932:2) stated that remembering consist of perceiving study, and
all of thinking, they are cognitive process and part of individual. This
Theory is the involvement of background knowledge and experience in the
past as an initial interpretation of the understanding. Schema theory
started from theory remembering by Bartlett, in his study about
experimental and social Psychology. It was foundation of schema theory.
34
besides that, in his study claimed that two method from remembering.
Namely, repeated reproduction and serial reproduction. repeated
reproduction : The same individual repeatedly reproduces the same story,
than Bartlett Centered to how people remember the story and how their
memories will change over time, finally their ability for retelling. serial
reproduction used the children’s game of rumor or telephone. The first
person whispers a word or phrase into the ears of a second person, until it
reaches the last player, The last player says the word or phrase out loud.
From the this, we can hear how much it has changed from the first whisper
at the beginning. Another book by Bartlett, his book’s (1958) namely
Thinking: An Experimental and social study. Without, it’s book not enjoy
the first book “Remembering”. It is called Human Chain ( Roediger, 2003).
Then related with the definition of schema theory is the active role
of the organization as the influence of the past, it means that there is an
active role organizing the background knowledge or experience of the past
could be the foundation of one's understanding (Bartlett:1932).
Continued Goodman (1976)’s schema theory is the model
“guessing games”, that refers to the human which consist of memory high
level structure like structure abstract in heir mind. Continued Coady
(1979)’s basic psycholinguistic model is elaborate in three important
aspect they are conceptual abilities, process strategies, and background
knowledge for producing reading comprehension (in Michael and
Richards C. Jack, 1987: 219). Also, Richards C. Jack (1987: 220) stated
35
that schema theory is the process of interpretation which guided by the
principle that every input is mapped against some existing schema and
those all aspects of the schema must be compatible with input
information. Finally, schema theory is abstract structure in brain of human
which organized by the comprehension of existing or past experience with
new knowledge and comprehension. Then, according to Brown (2011)
mention that The hallmark of the theoretical schema is The text of reading
does not give meaning by itself but, In the reader's brain there is already
information, experience, culture, emotions that are abstract shapes. This is
called the schema theory.
From the all, the writer conclude that schema theory is interactive
between readers with text readings. Readers read using abstract schema
(combination prior knowledge, experience, culture) in their minds. So that
it can get the available information of meaning in the text.
b. Types of Schema Theory
Michael and Richards (1987: 223), stated that just two type of
schema theory, they are formal schemata and content schemata. There
are three major types of schema theory, they are formal of schema theory,
content of schema theory and cultural of schema theory (carrel,
1983.1987, carrel and Eisterhold:1983). As general, there are three types
of schema theory, namely (Yousef et al.,2014; Hui et al., 2007). The
explanation of the each types are:
36
1). formal of schema theory or textual schema is defined as knowledge
background which refers to comprehend the linguistic, organization
between text, rhetorical organization. Formal schemata is knowledge
background of the reader and comprehension about rhetorical
organization structure of the text (Michael and Richards, 1987: 223).
Formal schemata are the organizational forms and rhetorical structures
of written texts (Hui et. al., 2007). Formal schemata or textual schema
is knowledge of linguistic structure, rhetorical structure and knowledge
of the text how it is organized and what the main features of a
particular genre of written ( Yousef et. al., 2014). Recently, Weliati
(2015), stated that Formal schemata is The structures rhetorical and
text organizational. Like language structures, vocabulary, grammar and
level of formality differently. It described as expectation in our
attempts to understand a meaning abstract, encoded, internalized,
coherent patterns of meta-linguistic, discourse and textual organization.
2). Content of schema theory is knowledge background including text
area, such as text topic. Content schemata refers to the background
knowledge of the content area of a text, or the topic of a text talks
about (Hui et. al, 2007). Generally content schemata contain in
formation about topic text (Zhang : 2010). Next, Weliati (2015) stated
that content of schema theory refers on knowledge background
discusses the contents of the text and topics in the text, such as
familiar topics, knowledge background, and experience aspect.
37
3). Linguistic of schema theory included knowledge background about
linguistic, like vocabulary and grammar. Hai (2007) stated that linguistic
schema is the foundation of other schemata, because linguistic
knowledge plays an essential part in text understanding. Then, Weliati
(2015) stated that This schema is the main foundation of other schema
because it has an important role in understanding the text. without
knowledge of language (linguistic)the reader does not know the
meaning of the text.
However, dissimilar with Brown (2001), defined that there are two
types of schema theory, as follow first, content schemata refers to
knowledge about people, the world, culture, and the universe. and
second, formal schemata is knowledge about discourse structure of the
text.
c. Schema Theory in Reading Comprehension
The process of the occurrence of schema theory for reading
comprehension has been presented by several experts. One of them,
Michael and Richards C. Jack (1987: 221) stated that two basic modes of
information possessing they are bottom up and top down. Bottom up (data
driven) is processing is evoked by the incoming data, the features of data
enter the system through the best fitting. Top down (conceptually driven)
occurs as the system makes general predictions based higher level,
general schemata and then searches the input for information to fit into
these partially satisfied, higher order schemata. Hui (2007) stated that in
38
psychologists distinguished three kinds of processing: bottom-up model,
top-down model and interactive model.
Brown (2007) stated that there are three processes that cover
how reading skill. Firstly, bottom-up processing refers to how readers read
by knowing the meaning of every word in the text to get the idea.
Secondly, top-down processing is the process in which readers are aware
of core information submitted by the author although the reader is not
familiar with all the vocabulary contained in the reading text. Thirdly,
interactive reading processing is Readers combine between Bottom-up
Processing and Top-down Processing. The reader can know linguistic
structure include the meaning each vocabulary and comprehend discourse
knowledge
In addition, Mikulecky (2008:1) identifies that all of a person’s prior
knowledge, experience, and values are organized in categories, or
schemata. Finally, Knowledge has been obtained and the experience that
is passed through will be stored in the human brain in the form of abstract
structures which are called schemata theory. The schema theory admits
the importance of background knowledge in in the comprehension
process. Experts often argue that the background knowledge is essential
in visualizing the object being described in the text.
So previous information affects new information that involves the
schemes stored in our minds. According to Rumelhart (1976: 6) there are
three kinds in the modification of schema theory in learning process, as
39
follows. Firstly, accretion refers to the process of encoding with new
information with an existing schema. This process is the interpretation of
new information with the existing scheme, this is called the process of
interpretation. it is as the basis for reconstruction of information
processing to change the system, answering questions that cannot be
answered before. It like cognitive dissonance (Adekoya, 2013). Secondly,
tuning or Schema Evolution refers to the function of applying the scheme
is slowly improving. So the combination of new information and
experience can not be fully accommodated in the existing scheme, As a
result the scheme should be more consistent with the new
experience.Thirdly, restructuring or Schema Creation refers to the process
of creating a new scheme from the new information.
d. Reading as Cognitive Process
As part of receptive skill, reading has been widely perceived as a
process of cognition that works within the mind. As a cognitive process,
reading involves processes that constitute a beginning state, an
intervening transformation, and an end state (Bernhardt, 1991). Taking
into account Just and Carpenter’s (1987) view, a reading process involves
what information in the text that accounts for as a point of departure, how
long the process takes, what information used during the process, and
what the reader has learned when the process is finished. This implies that
understanding cognitive process means examining the reading process as
40
an interpersonal problem-solving task that takes place within the brain
knowledge structures (Bernhardt, 1991).
Reading is simply a receptive language process that requires
cognitive process. Goodman (1998), stated that reading is a
psycholinguistic process that starts with a linguistic surface representation
encoded by a writer and ends with meaning which the reader constructs.
As such, there is an essential interaction between language and thought in
reading. The writer encodes thought as language and the reader decodes
language to thought. Goodman (1998) argues that proficient readers, for
example, are both efficient and effective in constructing the meaning that
they can assimilate or accommodate that bear some level of agreement
with the original meaning of the author. As a cognitive process, reading
constitutes a social process that involves cultural transmission (Bloome &
Greene, 1984).
Language comprehension is generally viewed in cognitive theory
as consisting of active and complex processes in which individual
construct meaning from written information (Anderson 1985; Byrnes 1984;
Call 1985; Howard 1985; Pearson, 1985; Richards 1983). The mental
processes necessary for comprehending aural and written text are
sufficiently similar to comprehension of both can generally be discussed as
a common phenomenon. Anderson (1985) distinguishes comprehension
into three interrelated processes that include perceptual processing,
41
parsing, and utilization. The meaning of each interrelated process may be
elaborated in subsequent paragraphs.
In perceptual processing, learner’s attention focusses on oral or
written text with portion of the text being retained in short term memory.
The capacity limitation of short term memory prevents specific word
sequences from being retained longer than a few seconds. This happens
due to incoming infromation that tends to replace the old information that
had been retained in short term memory. While the text is still in short term
memory some initial analysis of the language code may begin and
encopding process gradually convert the text to meaningful
representations. During this process, attention may be directed selectively
to aspect of the tasks or the context that will be useful in comprehension.
(O’Malley & Chamot, 1999).
In parsing, words and phrases are used to construct meaningful
mental representation of the text . Individuals first decode individual words
by matching the aural or visual pattern of the word with its representation
in the declarative knowledge stored in long term memory (Gagne, 1985).
The result of decodning is lexical access, or a matching between words in
short term memory and a type of dictionary in long-term memory that
enables to identify the meaning of individual words. There are existence of
variations in the amount of information retained in long term memory, the
way in which information in long term memory is organized (Rabinowitz
& Chi, 1987).
42
The third process is what they call as utilization where a learner
relates a mental representation of the meaning of the text to declarative
knowledge in long term memory. This propcess is referred to as
elaboration in other description of the reading process (Gagne, 1985). In
this process, declarative knowledge is stored in long term memory in
terms of either propositions or schemata. Utilization is the key to
comprehension process. In any message, according to this expert, there
may be an interplay between information that already stored and
information that is entirely new. Anderson (1985), refers to this as a
distinction between suppositions, ideas that writer or speaker presume we
already know and assertion, information the speaker or writer consider
either new or warranting emphasis. There are linguistic devices for
conveying that information which is supposed or asserted (O’Malley &
Chamot, 1999).
e. Comprehension in Reading
The theoretic views of comprehension in reading have been widely
acknowledged in the literature of reading to account for as bottom-up and
top down process. Johnston (1981), states that reading comprehension
involves conscious and unconscious use of various strategies. Carrell
(1998), reminded that new views of the nature of the reading process have
revitalized both theory and practice in second language reading. According
to this view, reading is an interaction of both top-down and bottom up
processes. These processes utilize background knowledge that can be
43
termed as concept-driven. The interaction between top-down and bottom-
up process may be examined from the perspectives of theory, research
and instruction. Overall, the new insight of reading process has
emphasized the role of schema or background knowledge in the process
of reading comprehension. The study employs top-down process as the
theoretical framework that views the schema as element to be central of
inferring meaning from the text. The view is relevant to the existing study
that takes adult learners whose background knowledge is already
sufficient to derive meaning from the text by employing strategies for
understanding written texts.
The top down model is influenced by schema theory, which
emphasizes the importance of the reader’s background knowledge in the
reading process (Carrell, 1998). According to this theory, to comprehend
the text, readers make use of both the text and their background
knowledge. Therefore, interaction of the background knowledge and the
text is important for effective and efficient reading. According to some
experts, a number of processes repeatedly occur in readers’ mind while
reading. The schema or background knowledge under top-down process
makes sufficient account for comprehension of the text. With the help of
such strategies and with the use of pre-reading information readers will be
able to make some predictions about the text. The process of
comprehension begins at the sentence level where readers identify the
meaning and grammatical category of a word and text details. While the
44
sentence provides information for further process, readers will check
whether the information fits again by employing both top-down and bottom
up process to make prediction about the text
The theoretical framework of the reading comprehension model is
presented in the following diagram based on top-down process. The
theoretical framework of comprehension in reading developed for this
study is what the so-called a schema-theoretic view that incorporates both
knowledge and input governed system. Goodman (1973) and Smith
(1971) addressed this view as the ‘psycholinguistic model of reading’. This
term is what Goodman also calls as ‘psycholinguistic guessing game’. The
very essential notion of this model is that the reader reconstructs a
message, which a writer has encoded as a graphic display (Goodman,
1972). The model is viewed as an act of the reconstruction of meaning as
being an on-going process of sampling from the input text involving
prediction. The better the reader is able to make correct prediction the less
confirming via the text necessary and the less visual perceptual
information the reader requires (Goodman, 1972) cited in Patricia et al.
(1998). This view is widely taken as an important reference in the field of
second language reading research.
Coady (1979), further elaborated this psycholinguistic view to
reading who claimed that the model of the EFL/ESL reader’s background
knowledge interacts with conceptual abilities. He incorporates conceptual
abilities with processing strategies that involve various components of
45
reading ability including general language processing skills. Coady’s
framework of reading has provided essential reference to the present
study with EFL background because he is the one that integrates the
emphasis of background knowledge with EFL situation. The following is
Coady’s (1979) model of the reading process.
C. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Figure 2. The theoretical framework of this research
D. OPERATIONAL DEFINITION
1. Schema theory is combination between prior knowledge, existing
information and experience in our mind, like abstract schema, in
interpreting new knowledge and information.
2. Students’ perception is students’ opinions about topic familiar in
reading text toward the students comprehension.
46
3. Topic familiar is something has known well, closely with as.
4. Topic unfamiliar is something has not known with as even we never
find something that.
5. Students’ reading comprehension is the ability to understand the
meaning of the text and capable to get implicit of information in the
text.
47
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the research design, research instruments,
subject of the study, sampling techniques, pilot study, data collection
process, and technique of data analysis.Two important considerations,
such as reliability and validity of data are seriously taken into account to
ensure valid and reliable research findings. To provide a holistic view
regarding the methodology of the present study, this chapter addresses
the research approach that includes how the subjects were determined,
what characteristics and subject eligibility were considered, the sampling
technique, research instrumentations and their suitability, data collection
procedure, and data analysis.
To provide a holistic view regarding the methodology of the present
study, this chapter addresses the research approach that includes how the
subjects were determined, what characteristics and subject eligibility were
considered, the sampling technique, research instrumentations and their
suitability, data collection procedure, and data analysis. To cater for
degree of research validity and reliability, Cresswell’s (2009)
recommendations that include all forms of potential intervention that may
affect the research outcome, such as research treatment as well as task
design have been given due care. These mentioned aspects will provide
48
justifiable arguments that guide the researcher to obtain reliable and valid
data thus present high acceptability of these current research findings.
A. Research Design
The present research is mainly exploratory in nature where a
mixture of both quantitative and qualitative method was employed. The
strength of qualitative research, for example, is its ability to provide
complex textual descriptions of how people experience a given research
issue. According to Weijer et al. (1999) qualitative research provides
information about the “human” side of an issue that is the often-
contradictory behaviors, beliefs, opinions, emotions, and relationships of
individuals. Qualitative method is also effective in identifying intangible
factors, such as social norms, socioeconomic status, gender roles,
ethnicity, and religion, whose role in the research. When used along with
quantitative methods, qualitative research can help us to interpret and
better understand the complex reality of a given situation and the
implications of quantitative data (ibid, 1999). Quantitative methods, on the
other hand, may play a subsidiary role in that they provide quantified
background data to contextualize small scale project, they may test
hypothesis derived from qualitative work and finally can provide a basis for
case sampling. Both qualitative and quantitative research can aim at
description of social reality and they are complementary rather than
contradictory.
49
There is a need to present a number of philosophical assumptions
regarding the nature of these two forms of research. Wierisma (2000), for
example, states that qualitative and quantitative researchers represent two
distinctly different approaches to understanding of the phenomena.
Krathwohl (1993) cited in Hadianto (2011) points out that qualitative
research describes phenomena in word instead of number or measures
while quantitative research describes phenomena in number, category and
classification as well as measures. In this respect, the different research
methods can have a number of implications. However, certain scholar,
such as Lincoln and Guba (1985) posited arguments against the mixed
method and stated that these virtually represent different worldviews. They
remind that qualitative method is effective for triangulation whether the
results of quantitative results are consistent with the findings. They also
argue that both qualitative and quantitative share equal weights in the
case of integrated in one study, or they are conducted simultaneously or
consecutively. The mixed methods adopted for this study are integrated in
one study where the cognitive and metacognitive investigation on reading
has different treatments in terms of form and process of data collection.
The design of the present research is a qualitative and quantitative
research design commonly used as mixed method research design. The
design is because the subjects of the research are very limited that does
not involve a large number of populations. The instrument utilized involves
open-ended questionnaire and in-depth interview in order to suit the nature
50
of the research design. The selection of limited number of subject that
requires the research design to be a qualitative design is due to the fact
that not many students have good proficiency in reading at the vocational
education of Mutiara Ilmu Makassar. Therefore, the present research limits
the number of the subjects in order to have holistic view of the relationship
between familiar and unfamiliar topic and the students’ comprehension.
The two types of text will be the basis for comparing whether students’
comprehension is affected by the familiarity and unfamiliarity.
B. The Subject of the Research
The subjects were senior secondary school education whose age
ranges from 16-18 and who have studying English at the institution for two
years. At the commencement of the research, the subjects were towards
the end of their third year of education and the researcher assumed that
they have possessed substantial language proficiency. The subjects were
selected in such a way that they could represent the large population
needed for the study. Therefore, they were eligible to take part in the study
because they have had level of reading and to report in what they have
read. The subjects’ previous experiences at school were considered
sufficient to provide data about familiar and unfamiliar topic.
The determination of the subject based on the considerations
mentioned above matched the consideration as advised by Cohen (1995)
to take the subject’s language proficiency, maturity, and knowledge of the
51
task and instruction into account. Overall, the subjects have had
substantial ability in a problem-solving task as well as verbalizing ability in
making assessment about familiar and unfamiliar topic. The subjects were
eligible to meet what Someren et al. (1994) have advised that the
important property of subjects with regard to the applicability to provide
assessment of what familiar and unfamiliar topic are. There is a need to
pinpoint that the subjects’ level of proficiency does not necessarily reflect
the proficiency level of learners with ESL background. There is a reliance
on types of considerations used for classifying level of proficiency. Overall,
the educational and social background of the subject are taken into
account and therefore they could provide reliable and valid data needed
for the study.
C. Research Instruments
In order to comply with the expected data needed for the study, a
cluster of research instruments was employed. These include familiar and
unfamiliar reading text, open-ended interview and questionnaire as well as
field notes. The use of range of instruments is fundamental for the study
that mixes both quantitative and qualitative paradigm. The validity and
reliability of adopted research instruments is then important to ensure
accountable process in order to obtain results of academic and trustworthy
investigation. The academic reading text or an expository text was the
most appropriate genre of text selected to suit the collection of verbal
protocols for some reasons.
52
Firstly, expository texts have characterized the reading section of
the entrance test when the students first enrolled in their tertiary education.
Secondly, lecturers had often used expository texts as textual drills in
assigning the students with the reading comprehension exercises at most
tertiary studies in Indonesia. Finally, expository texts were the most often
encountered in the reading part of the test in the recruitment of
employment in the government offices and for admission test for the
postgraduate level. In addition, the academic reading text is an appropriate
means of stimulating the learners’ verbal report data. Finally, EFL learners
were constantly in contact with texts of this nature during their course of
study.
The academic reading text or an expository text was the most
appropriate genre of text selected to suit the collection of verbal protocols
for some reasons. Firstly, expository texts have characterized the reading
section of the entrance test when the students first enrolled in their tertiary
education. Secondly, lecturers had often used expository texts as textual
drills in assigning the students with the reading comprehension exercises
at most tertiary studies in Indonesia. Finally, expository texts were the
most often encountered in the reading part of the test in the recruitment of
employment in the government offices and for admission test for the
postgraduate level. In addition, the academic reading text is an appropriate
means of stimulating the learners’ verbal report data. Finally, EFL learners
53
were constantly in contact with texts of this nature during their course of
study at tertiary level.
Another important research instruments as mentioned before
include open-ended questionnaire and in-depth interview. The utilization of
the instruments matches the research qualitative design of the present
research. In addition, field notes and interview were also utilized to provide
more reliable qualitative data from the samples. The second semester
students account for as the samples of the study because at this stage
they are vulnerable to familiarity and familiarity of text.
The third important instrument, background questionnaire, was
employed as a tool to gather additional data about the subject. The
background questionnaire is an essential research tool for qualitative
inquiry that helps in the provision of secondary data and for triangulation
purposes. It was considered important to obtain extent of information from
the informants regarding their family, background study and their
motivation towards learning English as a foreign language to ensure
reliable and valid gain of data about the learners’ cognitive reading
characteristics. This additional information was especially helpful in
providing supplementary information when insufficiency occurred during
the think-aloud session. The background questionnaire was designed in
semi-structured form to account for as written field notes for triangulation
purposes. Data gained from the background questionnaire is important for
justifying that the subjects were homogenous.
54
D. Sampling Technique
The sampling technique adopted for the present research employs
purposive sampling technique. Five students regarded as the best
students representing the total population of the second year students
were selected as the research samples. The criteria set up for the
principles of selection include homogeneity of the students, level of
maturity, and their academic performance including their academic
achievement during schools and reading test to be performed prior to data
collection. At least, there are additional criteria for selecting the samples in
order to gain reliable and valid data about what counts as familiar and
unfamiliar topic.
E. Determination of Familiar and Unfamiliar Topic
To determine what constitutes familiar and unfamiliar topic, a list of
topical issues ranging from daily life to academic life were delivered to all
the second year students (about 50 students). These learners were asked
to provide a tick (those that include familiar issue and without a tick those
that include unfamiliar). Some students might not have the same rating of
the familiarity and unfamiliarity but the researcher should be able to
determine what issues that received the greatest tick. From this, familiar
and unfamiliar topic were determined. From this basis, two reading texts
were prepared for collecting data according to familiar issue and unfamiliar
issue. These two different texts were used as reading test for the selected
55
samples and the responses upon the reading questions were matched
between level of correct answers and topic familiarity and unfamiliarity.
From doing this, the trend of familiar and unfamiliar topic could be
determined.
To see the students’ reading comprehension, the researcher used
reading test. The researcher took reading text from printed book for
vocational school grade XI (curriculum 2013). It is because the samples of
the research have used curriculum 2016.
F. Data Collection Procedure
The data collection procedure was performed directly at the setting
of the research in the campus of SMK Mutiara Computer Makassar
sometime towards the end of June 2017. Two determined English
expository texts (familiar and unfamiliar text) were prepared and used as
reading test for 5 selected samples for the study. The first reading text
entitled, “Visual Basic Programming” as familiar topic and the second text
entitled, “The Incredible Flea” treated as unfamiliar topic. The first day of
data collection, familiar text was given to 5 selected samples and they
were given 60 minutes to respond to the accompanying questions. The
second day of data collection, the samples were provided with unfamiliar
text and given 60 minutes to complete the accompanying questions. The
samples’ responses to each type of text (familiar and unfamiliar) were
examined, assessed, and crosschecked with one type of the text to obtain
the relationship between the responses and text familiarity.
56
G. Data Analysis Technique
As the study employed two different methods of data collection, the
quantitative and qualitative, then the treatment of data analysis would be
different. Insights from research reference of the methods of data analysis
are used as a guide for this purpose. With reference to the coding system
in the qualitative research, Merriam (2009:169) suggests managing
system for organizing data with the involvement of coding system.
Information gained from this system will be analysed inductively by means
of interpretation and description. The nature of data analysis that concerns
verbal reporting will be content analysis.
The level of difficulty of the text used from the study was carefully
considered. The data were analyzed by means of descriptive qualitative
based on interpretative research paradigm. The data obtained from open-
ended questionnaire, direct observation and test results were described
and compared. Responses obtained from interview were critically
evaluated and assessed before concluding the relationship between
students’ responses and topic familiarity and unfamiliarity.
57
CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter addresses the findings gained from doing field
research on Mutiara Computer Ilmu Makassar based on a number of
research instrument used for the present study that include observation,
in-depth interview, and open ended questionnaire. These findings are the
basis for presenting the discussions involving the subject perceptions of
familiar and unfamiliar topics. How these familiarity and unfamiliarity affect
their comprehension of expository text are also discussed in this chapter.
A. Findings
The findings of the present study came up with two determined
issues that base the analysis between familiarity and unfamiliarity and
reading performance. The followings are data where reliability and validity
have been considered in order to have real picture of the relationship
between text familiarity and unfamiliarity and reading performance. The
presentation of finding are based on the actual study and data evidence
that were gained from utilizing several research instruments, such as
interview, field notes, open-ended questionnaire and reading test results
that were performed directly in the research setting in one of the vocational
high school at Makassar.
58
Table 1: Distribution of Topics and Subject Response (N=5)
LEARNER 1 (ARP)
NO TOPIC FAMILIARITY UNFAMILIARITY REASON
1 Travelling Unfamiliar Not interested and rarely travel
2 Transportation Familiar Prevalence and availability in daily live
3 Tourism Unfamiliar Prevalence but not interested
4 Business Unfamiliar Prevalence but not interested
5 Politics Familiar So pervasive in social media
6 Media and Communication
Unfamiliar Not my study destination
7 Gender Unfamiliar Not my interest
8 Language Familiar My interest and study destination
9 Music Unfamiliar Not talented in this area
10 Technology Familiar So pervasive in mass media
11 Sport Familiar It is one of my hobby
12 LGBT Unfamiliar Not really concerned
13 Global Warming Unfamiliar Never read text about it
14 Health Familiar It is often a problem in myself and
59
my family
15 Computer Familiar It is the daily topic in my school
16 Agriculture Unfamiliar It is not mentioned at all in my school
The table confirms areas in which the learner (LEARNER 1) is
familiar and unfamiliar with a range of topics presented to him. This learner
has 6 topics familiar and 8 topics unfamiliar. The range of familiarity and
unfamiliarity is generated by a range of reasons, such as interest,
prevalence, hobby, availability, frequency and so on. These reasons may
not be the case with other learners under this investigation most probably
due to differences in economic, education, and social background. Despite
the differences, the learner’s reasons for responding to this investigation
must be considered as valid and reliable findings. Learner 1 seems to be
more realistic in terms of his own knowledge of the so called familiarity. He
makes use of his reading experiences to make justification about the topic.
To sum up, this learner is able to make assumption regarding familiar and
unfamiliar topic.
60
Table 2: Distribution of Topics and Subject Response (N=5)
LEARNER 2 (YAW)
NO TOPIC FAMILIARITY UNFAMILIARITY REASON
1 Travelling Familiar I like travelling
2 Transportation Familiar Prevalence and availability in daily live
3 Tourism Unfamiliar Prevalence but not interested
4 Business Unfamiliar Prevalence but not interested
5 Politics Unfamiliar Prevalence of corruption
6 Media and Communication
Familiar This is an important issue
7 Gender Unfamiliar Not my interest
8 Language Familiar I simply like it
9 Music Unfamiliar Not talented in this area
10 Technology Familiar So pervasive in mass media
11 Sport Unfamiliar It is not my interest & hobby
12 LGBT Unfamiliar Disgusting topic
13 Global Warming Unfamiliar Never read text about it
14 Health Unfamiliar Not interested because it’s expensive
61
15 Computer Familiar It’s the major course in my school
16 Agriculture Unfamiliar Not the main topic in my school
Learner 2 as illustrated in this table is rather unique compared with
the rest of the learner in this investigation. He makes almost 80% of the
total topics presented to him as unfamiliar. Among of those are health,
global warming, LGBT, sport, music, gender, politics, business and
tourism. This learner is different from learner 3 in terms of two main
issues, such as politics and global warming. This learner has some
similarities and differences with the rest of other learners, such as making
the importance and availability in TV channels to be the reference for
making it familiar or unfamiliar. It may be inferred from this list that topic
familiarity and unfamiliarity is relatively different from one learner to the
other learners. The difference may concern with reading experience, topic
preference, and availability in mass media. This learner is also able to
make justification about familiar topic and unfamiliar one based on his
reading experience at school that revolves around texts about computer.
62
Table 3: Distribution of Topics and Subject Response (N=5)
LEARNER 3 (MRJ)
NO TOPIC FAMILIARITY UNFAMILIARITY REASON
1 Travelling Unfamiliar Seldom travel
2 Transportation Unfamiliar Not prevalence in social media
3 Tourism Familiar Prevalence and interested
4 Business Familiar Prevalence and it’s my father’s main job
5 Politics Familiar So pervasive in social media
6 Media and Communication
Unfamiliar Not my study destination
7 Gender Familiar There is a lot of written materials about it
8 Language Familiar My interest and study destination
9 Music Unfamiliar Not talented in this area
10 Technology Unfamiliar Not my interest
11 Sport Familiar It is one of my hobby
12 LGBT Unfamiliar Not really concerned
13 Global Warming Familiar Available in TV channels
63
14 Health Unfamiliar Not interested in discussing about it
15 Computer Familiar I deal with it every day
16 Agriculture Unfamiliar Not the major course in my school
As illustrated in this table, learner 3 makes an equal balance
between familiar and unfamiliar topics out of 14 topics presented to him.
Among the unfamiliar ones include health, LGBT, technology, music,
media and communication, transportation and travelling. The reference for
classifying those topics as unfamiliar and familiar resemble with some of
the learner in this investigation, such as availability in social media and
prevalence as public issues. This learner does not really make any
difference between the rest of the topics presented to him. As senior
secondary vocational school, he is also able to make justification regarding
text familiarity. He is not much different from the rest of other learners in
this group who based his justification on daily experience.
Table 4: Distribution of Topics and Subject Response (N=5)
LEARNER 4 (TAP)
NO TOPIC FAMILIARITY UNFAMILIARITY REASON
1 Travelling Unfamiliar Never do any travelling
2 Transportation Familiar Prevalence in TV channels
64
and social media
3 Tourism Familiar Prevalence and interested
4 Business Familiar So prevalence in TV and social media
5 Politics Familiar So pervasive in social media
6 Media and Communication
Familiar Interested in reading about it
7 Gender Unfamiliar Not my interest
8 Language Unfamiliar Don’t like English at all
9 Music Unfamiliar Not talented in this area
10 Technology Unfamiliar Not my favorite area
11 Sport Familiar It is one of my hobby
12 LGBT Unfamiliar Not really concerned
13 Global Warming Familiar It is an important world issue
14 Health Familiar It is important in life
15 Computer Familiar The main course of my school
16 Agriculture Unfamiliar It is not my interest
65
As can be seen in this table, learner 4 makes 6 topics as unfamiliar
topics, such as LGBT, technology, music, language, gender and travelling.
The main reason for including such topics as unfamiliar includes interests,
prevalence, availability in TV channels and social media. Learner 4 makes
the rest of the topic as familiar when they are important and interesting.
However, despite of the range of reason available in this investigation this
learner is not so different with the rest of the learners in terms of
perception and judgment. The types of justification differ in some respect
from other learners because he makes use of interest as the basis for
making justification of familiar and unfamiliar topic.
Table 5: Distribution of Topics and Subject Response (N=5)
LEARNER 5 (MNH)
NO TOPIC FAMILIARITY UNFAMILIARITY REASON
1 Travelling Unfamiliar I am not rich and never travels
2 Transportation Familiar It is so important during holidays
3 Tourism Familiar Prevalence and interested
4 Business Familiar Prevalence and interested
5 Politics Familiar So pervasive in TV channels
66
6 Media and Communication
Unfamiliar Not interested in it
7 Gender Unfamiliar Not my interest
8 Language Unfamiliar Not my destination of study
9 Music Familiar Many people like it
10 Technology Familiar So pervasive in mass media
11 Sport Unfamiliar It is not my interest
12 LGBT Unfamiliar Not really concerned
13 Global Warming Unfamiliar Never read text about it
14 Health Unfamiliar It is not a good topics
15 Computer Familiar It is the major course of my study
15 Agriculture Unfamiliar Not my interest
Learner 5 as illustrated in this table is rather different from the rest
of learners in this investigation. He assumed sport, LGBT, global warming
and health as unfamiliar topics with reference to his interest and their
availability in TV channels and social media. This learner consider other
topics, such as technology, music, politics, business, tourism and
transportation as familiar topics because they are available in TV channels
and mass media. Despite differences in terms of interest and perception
about familiarity of topics, this learner has identical reference for making
67
judgment about specific topics. This learner makes use of personal
justification, such as economic background and personal interest.
Appearance in TV channels is one of the fundamental aspect for film to
justify whether a topic is familiar or unfamiliar.
Table 6: Distribution of Familiar & Unfamiliar Topics
LEARNER FAMILIAR UNFAMILIAR
LEARNER 1 Transportation, politics,
language, technology,
sport, health, computer
Travelling, Tourism,
Business, Media &
Communication,
Gender, Music, LGBT,
Global Warming,
Agriculture
LEARNER 2 Travelling,
Transportation, Media
& Communication,
Language, Technology,
Computer
Tourism, Business,
Politics, Gender, Music,
Sport, LGBT, Global
Warming, Health,
Agriculture
LEARNER 3 Tourism, Business,
Politics, Gender,
Language, Sport,
Global Warming,
Computer
Travelling,
Transportation, Media
& Communication,
Music, Technology,
LGBT, Agriculture
LEARNER 4 Transportation,
Tourism, Business,
Politics, Media &
Communication, Sport,
Global Warming,
Travelling, Gender,
Language, Music,
Technology, LGBT,
Agriculture
68
Health, Computer
LEARNER 5 Transportation,
Tourism, Business,
Politics, Music,
Technology, Computer
Travelling, Media,
Gender, Language,
Sport, LGBT, Global
Warming, Health,
Agriculture.
As can be seen from the table, the concept of familiarity and
unfamiliarity differs from one learner to the other learners in the
investigation. The distribution of familiar and unfamiliar topics occurs in the
five learners and therefore the researcher can not make conclusive
statement regarding the topics. The main reason is most probable due to
the fact that learners have different social, economic, and educational
background. This implies that learners’ background contributes to the
concept of familiar or unfamiliar topics which are important in the
comprehension process of a text.
The most prevalent issue among the learners is about
transportation because almost all learners put the issue as their familiar
topic. While the most unfamiliar topic concerns LGBT because it occurs in
almost 5 learners. The reasons for the classification of familiar and
unfamiliar topics range among the learners and therefore familiarity and
unfamiliarity of the text presents a very subjective judgment depending on
the social context of the individual learner. The finding confirms an
important explanation as to why familiarity of topics needs to be taken into
69
account when encouraging text comprehension to the senior high school
learners.
Learner 1 and Learner 2 differs in that learner 1 makes travelling
and media and communication as unfamiliar topics which are familiar
topics by learner 2. Overall, transportation accounts for the majority as
familiar topic in the view of four learners (Learner 1, 2,4, 5). In contrast,
travelling also accounts for as the major unfamiliar topic in the four
learners (Learner 1, 3,4 and 5). The two different topics have actually been
quite popular because travelling and transportation are closely related.
Therefore, the concept of familiarity and unfamiliarity may account for as
an important reference to improve students’ comprehension. The
differences found among the learners are probably due to differences in
the way they perceive text and also due to their academic, social and
economic background.
Table 7: Test Result of Reading with Familiar Topic (The Visual Basic
of Computer)
N
O
LEARNE
R (N=5)
CORREC
T
ANSWER
% INCORREC
T ANSWER %
JUSTIFICATIO
N
1 Learner 1
(ARP) 8
80
% 2
20
% Satisfactory
2 Learner 2
(YAW) 9
90
% 1
10
%
Very
satisfactory
70
3 Learner 3
(MRJ) 7
70
% 3
30
% Satisfactory
4 Learner 4
(TAP) 8
80
% 2
20
% Satisfactory
5 Learner 5
(MNH) 7
70
% 3
30
% Satisfactory
As can be seen from the table, all learners exhibit a range of
satisfactory answer in the reading text of familiar topic about computer.
Learner 1 performed satisfactory answer with 8 correct answers (80%) out
of 10 questions provided and only missed 2 questions (20%). Learner 2
performed better than learner 1 and she even the best learner in terms of
number of correct answer on reading test about computer (90%). Two
other learners (Learner 3 and 7) have equal performance with 70% correct
answer on the reading questions. There seems to be a positive correlation
between text familiarity and reading performance.
One of the main reason is probably due to lexical familiarity that
helps learner to interpret the messages put forward by the author. It is
often the case that vocabulary acquisition helps significantly in
understanding the main idea of the text. Another reason could be the
reading frequency that often helps the reader anticipate the idea within the
text. Overall, familiarization of the text will help reader to perform better
reading strategies, such as previewing, skimming and scanning. These
71
strategies are helpful in making inference of the meaning or ideas the
author is trying to communicate through text. Text familiarity is so helpful
because in encourages motivation to predict and resolve the problem
while reading. Therefore, teachers of reading must be made aware of the
importance of text familiarity in order to improve students’ comprehension.
Table 8: Test Result of Reading with Unfamiliar Topic
(The Incredible Flea)
N
O
LEARNE
R (N=5)
CORREC
T
ANSWER
% INCORREC
T ANSWER %
JUSTIFICATIO
N
1 Learner 1
(ARP) 5
50
% 5
50
% Fair
2 Learner 2
(YAW) 4
40
% 6
60
% Unsatisfactory
3 Learner 3
(MRJ) 6
60
% 4
40
% Fair
4 Learner 4
(TAP) 3
30
% 7
70
% Unsatisfactory
5 Learner 5
(MNH) 2
20
% 8
80
% Unsatisfactory
As can be seen from the table, the majority of learners performed
unsatisfactory results in the reading text with unfamiliar topic that concern
72
an insect. Two learners (Learner 1 and 3) performed relatively fair result
(50% and 60%) from the total questions presented. Learner 1, 4 and 5
exhibited unsatisfactory answer (40%, 30%, and 20%) from the total 10
questions presented to them. The reading text that constitutes as an
expository text has only 10 questions but it generates a level of difficulty to
the learners because the nature of the text is unfamiliar to them.
The text that concerns insect is not the issue that frequently
presented to the students who are majoring on computer. This text
presents a number of vocabulary and lexical items which are not familiar to
them and therefore they could not make sense of what they read. They are
not even able to use appropriate reading strategies that can be used any
time when reading text presents a level of difficulty. This implies that
employing strategies will work properly when readers are aware of the
text. Because reading involves a complex cognitive process then it seems
that text familiarity will help cognitive ability in processing information from
the text. Finally lexical as well as content familiarity will not only help
readers to understand and process the information but also help readers
to access their reading strategies when text generates difficulty.
B. Discussion
The discussion of findings focuses on the results of two forms of
reading tests that concern familiar and unfamiliar topics (The Visual Basic
Programming and The Incredible Flea). The analysis of the results of the
reading tests also takes reference to the supplementary data taken from
73
informal interview with the selected subjects and open-ended
questionnaire. The data taken from field notes are also used to make
analysis of the relationship between text familiarity and students reading
comprehension.
a. What Is The Relationship Between Familiar and Unfamiliar Textual
Topic And Students’ Comprehension?
The analysis of the first Research Question refers to the types of
questions addressed in familiar topic entitled “The Basic Visual
Programming” based on 10 reading questions. The reliability and validity
of such familiar text is evident in the previous tables 7 (see also
appendices reading text “The Basic Visual Programming” ). The questions
are as follows: 1. The primary purpose of the passage is to…..2.The
author tone in this passage is best described as….3. In the passage,
framework was used by visual basic is……4. The advantages of visual
basic when we compare with another programming are….5. In the
passage, there is no the differences between Visual Basic for Applications
and Visual Basic because…..6. According to the passage, which of the
following statements is true?...7. From the passage, we can conclude
that……8. What is the function of IDE? 9. “it requires an interpreter to
read the “P-code” created through the compilation process” (paragraph 4)
The word interpreter is closet meaning with…… 10. What is the reason if
you learn programming in windows, you returned to Visual Basic?
74
Since the selected learners are students of vocational secondary
school of Computer Mutiara Ilmu Makassar then the topic of Visual Basic
Programming is quite familiar for them. The whole questions do not posit
any difficulty because the text contains vocabulary which are familiar to
them. In responding to question 1 that addresses the purpose of the
passage, almost all of the five learners attempted the correct answer
because these learners are already aware of terms, such as the word
‘programming’. These learners can simply choose one out of four
statements because they have advanced knowledge in relation to the
statements provided. Therefore, familiarity encourages background
knowledge needed for making inference from a reading text.
In responding to question 2 (The author tone in this passage is best
described as….) almost all learners attempted correct answer because
these learners could infer something from reading a title about computer.
The sentence in the third paragraph that reads, “Visual Basic for
Applications is not an entirely different language from Visual Basic.
Rather, as the name suggests, VBA is a specialized implementation
of the Visual Basic language that is designed to be used within
existing….etc.…empower the learners to make prediction about the
tone of the passage. Reading the third paragraph facilitates these
learners that the author’s tone is to inform the benefit of the Basic
Visual Programming. The terms have been heard at least many
times as far as the students are concerned. Familiarity, therefore,
75
encourages prediction and anticipation of implied and explicit
questions.
In responding to question number 3 that reads, “In the
passage, framework was used by visual basic is…” these learners
did not have problem because the nature of the question requires an
understanding of referential question where the answer is explicitly
stated in the text. As learners are well aware of the two key words
related to computer (framework/visual) then they could attempt the
correct answer. Here, the familiarity of text helps them make an
inference and make use of scanning strategy to resolve the problem.
Therefore, familiarity encourages solution to reading problems in
order to comprehend the text.
In responding to question number 4 that reads, “The
advantages of visual basic when we compare with another
programming are…” these learners simply refer to two key words,
such as ‘advantage’ and ‘compare’. The answer for this question is
explicitly stated within the paragraph with reference to two key
words. The students’ familiarity with the text helps them visualize the
two key words and their relevance with the text helps them to
resolve the reading difficulty. There is of course certain instance
where these learners need to reread the sentence to make sure that
their comprehension is true.
76
In responding to question number 5 that reads, “In the
passage, there is no the differences between Visual Basic for
Applications and Visual Basic because….” These learners also take
reference to two important phrases, such as ‘visual basic’ and
‘application’. Since these two key words are explicitly stated in the
paragraph then these learners actually do not have problem in
finding the correct answer. Therefore, familiarity with text also helps
learners make use of available strategy in resolving the reading
problem. When the researcher asked how they came up with the
correct answer they simply responded that they had been familiar
with such terms long before so that they could easily make
prediction and guessing to provide reading with better
comprehension.
In responding to question number 6 that reads, “According to
the passage, which of the following statements is true?” these
learners also did not have problem because the nature of the
question is about validation whether the statement is true or false
and the four alternative answer provided revolves around visual
basic that has been quite familiar with the students. Therefore,
despite the difficulty due to sentence complexity they resolved the
question successfully because their schema or prior knowledge work
in this system to attempt correct answer. Therefore, familiarity
77
encourages the background knowledge needed for comprehension
of the text.
In responding to question number 7 that reads, ‘From the
passage, we can conclude that…the learners have been well aware
of the context about computer programming so that the question did
not encourage any difficulty to them. An account of reading difficulty
reports that unfamiliarity with the topic will inhibit the
comprehension mechanism. The nature of this question is more
difficult than the rest of other questions because it is an inferential
question that requires a holistic understanding to respond. Because
these learners have advanced knowledge about the reading content,
then they could anticipate and make a correct guessing.
In responding to question number 8 that reads, “What is the
function of IDE?” the majority of learners could anticipate the answer
because they are well aware of the term IDE even before start
reading the text. The IDE stands for Integrated Development
Environment that has come up in the first paragraph of the text.
Although the term has nothing to do with computer programming, its
appearance in the first two paragraph makes it less difficult for
students to get the answer. With scanning technique the key word
may be found quickly in the text because it is written using capital
letters and as such it is easy to find somewhere in the text.
78
In responding to question 9 that reads, ““it requires an
interpreter to read the “P-code” created through the compilation
process” (paragraph 4) The word interpreter closet meaning
with……most of the learner taking computer science are well aware
of the meaning of ‘interpreter’ because this word often explicitly
appears in most textbooks of computer. Therefore, the learners do
not have difficulty in making sense of the word and as such they
attempted a correct answer out of this question.
The final question regards question 10 that reads, “What is the
reason if you learn programming in windows, you returned to Visual
Basic?” learners could make meaning from this question because
they easily link the two key words, such as ‘programming windows”
and “visual basic”. The two key words are so common in the world of
computer science and as such students are quite familiar with this
term. Overall discussions confirm that topic familiarity encourages
students to make meaning from the text and make necessary
guessing when text generates difficulty.
b. What Is The Relationship Between Unfamiliar Textual Topic And
Students’ Comprehension?
The answer of the Research Question 2 refers to unfamiliar textual
topic entitled, “ The Incredible Flea” with 10 accompanying questions. The
ten questions have identical level of difficulty with the familiar textual topic
that include: 1. Primary purpose of the passage is to………2. The author’s
79
tone in the passage is best described as…3. According to the passage,
fleas are resistant to sprays and chemicals because they…..4. Fleas are
difficult to squish because they have…5. According to the passage, fleas
are able to jump..6. Based on information in the passage, the reader can
understand that …7. The author mentions the Washington monument in
order to….8. It can be inferred that fleas will emerge from eggs as
adults……9. Using the information in the passage as a guide, it can be
concluded….10. According to the passage, fleas are able to jump…
From the profile of students’ correct answer for this text, it is evident
that text unfamiliarity relates to the students’ performance in responding to
the questions. As indicated in the table, the majority of students’ response
to the questions presented were not correct. In other words, most students
made misleading attempts to the question because they were not familiar
with the topic being addressed by the author. As such, most students did
not make prediction over the unfamiliar lexical items and thus could make
any inference or could make meaning from the text.
Other possible argument with reference to the unfamiliarity is that
the students could not access the available reading strategy because they
were not interested in the topic and as such they could utilize the proper
reading strategies when reading problem arise. Other available reading
strategies are not properly utilized when the text is unfamiliar because
reading is a complex cognitive process. Because reading is a complex
cognitive process, learners could not make sense of it because they were
80
not aware of the importance of such text. Therefore, unfamiliarity and
familiarity should be made clear when presenting a reading text to
students. The nature of questions that accompany the unfamiliar text does
not encourage guessing and prediction because the learners did not have
background knowledge to encourage meaning from the text.
The nature of second language reading requires that students
identify content instruction to understand the content of reading. However,
reading with unfamiliar content does not allow an understanding of content
instruction because learners lose their receptive skills and thus cannot
make sense of reading. Interest in reading also plays a very important role
because interest encourages prediction that enables background
knowledge to operate within a normal condition. Reading according to
some experts is a process of meaning construction and therefore readers
should make use of all potential to understand the messages. Therefore,
familiarity of the text is important to generate the process of meaning
construction especially content and lexical familiarity. To sum up,
unfamiliarity blocks the cognitive process of meaning construction.
2. How Do Textual Topic Familiarity And Unfamiliarity Affect The
Students’ Comprehension?
Text familiarity and unfamiliarity appears to affect the students’ level
of comprehension and this has been explained in the first research
questions. The familiarity affects the students’ level of comprehension in a
more positive way while unfamiliarity affects their comprehension in
81
destructive way. The two aspects are addressed in more details under this
heading. The explanation will take reference to some of the ideas that
have been given in the two previous Research Questions (RQ)
addressing, “What is the relationship between text familiarity and students’
comprehension?” and “What is the relationship between text unfamiliarity
and students’ comprehension?”.
Text familiarity encourages prediction necessary for meaning
construction. The construction of meaning is possible as background
knowledge operates to drive comprehension. As one of the students
stated that “I could predict what the intention of the author if I am familiar
with the topic”. The statement is relevant with the result of reading test
where familiar topic receives the highest score in almost all the 5 students.
In contrast, the unfamiliar topic on “The Incredible Flea” receives the
minimum score in almost all of the students. Prediction therefore plays an
important role here because it is not possible to make prediction when the
reader could not understand the context of text in which he or she is
reading.
Text familiarity also encourages high awareness over the lexical
item in terms of word meaning. The text often generates difficulty when it
contains a lot of strange words that make it impossible to make meaning
construction. As stated by one of the learner being investigated that, “ If
text is familiar to me I could translate the paragraph into Indonesian easily
but if it is unfamiliar I have to see dictionary very often”. The statement
82
implies that there are some steps taken by the reader to improve
comprehension when he or she is familiar with the reading text. Lexical
item often generates difficulty for readers especially when it contains a lot
of difficult words or technical terms. Therefore, word meaning is another
aspects that often inhibits comprehension.
Text familiarity generates the two reading process as top-down and
bottom up process of reading. Every reader regardless his/her social and
economic background will employ one of the reading processes mentioned
above. As text is familiar, the reader could associate the complexity of the
text and find methods and strategies to overcome the difficulty. Reading
encourages some difficulties especially for EFL readers where English is
not their first language. Therefore, the nature of text can be the source of
difficulty and thus meaning construction is blocked. The bottom up process
which some of the learners investigated use to answer some of the
questions in the text entitled, “Visual basic Programming” presents a very
satisfactory result. While the text entitled “The Incredible flea” presents
unsatisfactory result because the text is unfamiliar for them.
Text unfamiliarity, in contrast, does not generate prediction because
the reader is not well aware of what to predict and how to make prediction.
Text unfamiliarity does not bridge utilization of any reading strategies
because the cognitive process does not work properly. As one of the
student interviewed stated that, “If I am not familiar with the text I do not
have any interest in reading it”. The statement implies that unfamiliarity
83
does not encourage receptive skill including reading. When text is familiar,
such as with “The Basic visual programming” the students make use of
available reading strategies and therefore it encourages solution to any
difficulties in the reading text. To sum up, unfamiliarity affects the
comprehension in more destructive way because it does not encourage
motivation, interest and willingness to read. This is evident in the
responses of the 5 students mentioned in the previous tables.
The findings and discussions have been addressed in moderate
ways and data used to make elaboration and statement about the positive
and negative effect of text familiarity and unfamiliarity are considered
reliable. As such, the present research is will have a very positive
implication to the teaching of English as a foreign language especially the
teaching of reading in EFL context. The positive effect is evident in the
satisfactory result on the familiar topic and the negative effect is evident in
the unsatisfactory result of unfamiliar topic (See the table).
Table: 9. Effect of Familiar and Unfamiliar Topic
NATURE OF TEXT EFFECT JUSTIFICATION
FAMILIARITY
It encourages prediction,
motivation, and
willingness in the
process of meaning
reconstruction. It also
provides guessing ability
when the text presents
complexity in the
If readers have interest and motivation because the text is familiar, he or she will be able to make meaning
84
comprehension process.
It encourages utilization
of available reading
strategy to provide
solution to emerging
problems while reading.
It also enables
association to make
inferences and make
synthesis of difficult
paragraph so that
enables the process of
meaning reconstruction
reconstruction. This is because reading as part of receptive skills involves a complex cognitive process.
UNFAMILIARITY
Unfamiliarity
discourages motivation
and as such reduce
degree of motivation
among the learners. It
also reduces the chance
of guessing and
prediction which are so
powerful in the
comprehension process.
It also inhibit association
to predict the meaning of
difficult words necessary
As readers become unfamiliar with the topic, they will not be able to make prediction and guessing as part of reading resolution. Unfamiliarity also discourages motivation and blocks the chance of using available reading strategies, such as previewing, scanning and skimming. Finally, it does not allow schema or background knowledge to work effectively because the cognition fails to function well
86
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
Positive relation between familiar textual topic and students’
reading comprehension. Topic familiarity generates a range of reading
strategies among the learners. Learners are constantly aware of the
importance of familiarity of the texts to improve their level of
comprehension. Familiar topic facilitates learners to use various types of
reading strategies, such as scanning, skimming, monitoring
comprehension and evaluating comprehension.
Negative relation between unfamiliar textual topic and students’
reading comprehension. The unfamiliar topic does not encourage
maximum use of reading strategies and as such, readers are not able to
comprehend the text successfully. Unfamiliarity, on the other hand,
presents complexity to the students especially in making sense of the text.
They seemed to be bothered by complexity of the text, unfamiliar
vocabularies, and unfamiliar phrases. These learners did not even want to
make prediction to resolve the reading problem and this is true that their
cognitive process is hindered while reading.
The positive effect is evident in the satisfactory result on the familiar
topic. It is because familiarity of the text will activate the readers’
background knowledge and this is only possible when the readers make
87
relevant association to the reading content. Familiarity here bridges
between the readers and the text content in order to construct
comprehension over the text. The construction of comprehension is built
through activation of prior knowledge and reception of the readers to make
sense of their reading. Besides, there is negative effect is evident in the
unsatisfactory result of unfamiliar topic.
B. Suggestion
Having known the effect of familiarity and unfamiliarity topic on
students reading comprehension, reading training program is especially
necessary for EFL context because reading process needs self-direction
that requires reinforcement through training. Sharing the knowledge
through reading training program will make learning more meaningful
because the options will be available for learning and teaching. Reading
program will also provide an important basis for highly practical rather than
merely theoretical learning program. Two domains need consideration for
the implementation that includes reading strategy itself and how to develop
the strategy suitable for students at Mutiara Ilmu Computer Makassar.
In the future, there will be another researcher to study about the
comparison between topic familiarity and unfamiliarity for adult learner
(university students) and young learner (students High School). In the
future, there will be another researcher to study about the comparison
between topic familiarity and unfamiliarity for adult learner (university
students) and young learner (students High School). Besides, the
88
underlying factors that cause the reading strategy dan based on the
student’s prior knowledge should be considered.
89
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adekoya, Helen Odunola. 2013. Journal of Research and Development Vol. 1,No.2. Accesse at https://www.arabianjbmr.com/pdfs/RD_ VOL_1_3/1.pdf Retrieved on 15th October 2015.
Allington, R. L. 1980. Teacher interruption behaviors during primary-
gradeoral reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 371-377. Ana Cristina Lahuerta Martínez. 2014. Analysis of the Effect of Content
Familiarity and Gender on English as a Foreign Language Reading Comprehension by Spanish University Students.
Anderson, N. 1999. Exploring second language reading: Issues and
Strategies.Toronto. Canada: Heinle & Heinle Publisher. Anderson, J.R. 1985. Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. 2nd ed. New York. Freeman. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian. Penerbit PT. Rineka
Cipta: Jakarta. Artisiyanti, D. 2010. Bagaimana Meningkatkan Mutu Hasil Pelajaran
Bahasa Inggris Di Sekolah. Accessed at http://researchengines.com/artsiyant. html. Retrieved on 2nd February 2017.
Bartlett, F.C. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social
Psychology. Cambridge University Press. Barton, Mary Lee, & Deborah L. Jordan. 2001.Teaching reading in
science: a supplement to Teaching reading in the content areas teacher's manual. ASCD.
Basaraba Deni, et al. 2012. Examining the structure of reading
comprehension: do literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension truly exist?. Reading and Writing 26.3: 349-379.
Bernhardt, E.B. 1991. Reading Development in Second Language. New
Jersey. Alex Publishing Corporation. Briggs,L.1987. A poorattitude: A deterrent to reading
improvement.Reading Horizons, 27,202-208. Brown, H.D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning & Teaching. 4th
edition. Pearson Education & Ltd.
90
___________. 2001. Teach ing by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
__________. 2007. First Language Acquisition. Principles of Language
Learning and Teaching. 5th Ed. Pearson ESL. Bernhardt, E. B.1991. Reading Development in Second Language. New
Jersey. Alex Publishing Corporation. Bloom, D. & Green,J.1984. Direction in the sociolinguistic study of reading.
In Bernhardt,E.B.1991. Reading Development in Second Language. New Jersey. Alex Publishing Corporation.
Byrnes, H. 1984. The role of listening comprehension: A theoretical base.
Foreign Language Annals 17: pp.317-329. Call, M.E. 1985. Auditory short term memory, listening comprehension and
the input hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly 19: pp.765-781. Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus © Cambridge
UniversityPress) Accessed at http://dictionary.cambridge.org /dictionary/english/familiar#translations Retrieved on 15th October 2016.
Carrell, P. L. 1983. Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or
background knowledge, in second language comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 1, 81–92.
__________. 1987. Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL
Quarterly 21.3, 461-481. __________. 1998. Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading.
Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Carrell, P. L. & J. C. Eisterhold. 1983. Schema Theory and ESL Reading
Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly 17.4, 553-573. Chang Cecilia . 2006. Effects of Topic Familiarity and Linguistic Difficulty
on the Reading Strategies and Mental Representations of Nonnative Readers of Chinese. Journal of Language and Learning Volume4Number22006ISSN14758989.http://webspace.buckingham.ac.uk/kbernhardt/journal/jllearn/4_2/LEARN%203.pdf.
Carrell, P.L., Devine, J., Eskey, D.E. 1988. Interactive Approach to Second
Language Reading. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
91
Cohen, A.D. 1995. The role of language in thought in foreign language
learning. Working Papers in Educational 11 (2), pp.1-23. __________. 1998. Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language.
Edinburg. Longman Limited. Cresswell, J.W. 2009. Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and
Mixed Methods Approaches: Third edition. California. Sage Publication Ltd.
____________. 2012. Educational research : planning, conducting, and
evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. the United States of America: Pearson Education.
Depdiknas. 2004. Kurikulum 2004: Standar kompetensi mata pelajaran
bahasa Inggris sekolah menengah atas dan madrasah aliyah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
_________. 2007. Kurikulum 2004: Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran
Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta. Depdikbud. Dubin, F., & Bycina,D. 1991. Academic Reading and the ESL/EFL
Teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign language (2nd ed.) (pp. 195-215). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Erna I. 2012. A Survey of the English reading habits. TEFLIN Journal,
Volume 23, Number 2, July 2012. Erten İsmail Hakkı and Razı Salim. 2009. The effects of cultural familiarity
on reading comprehension. April 2009, Volume 21, No. 1 ISSN 15390578pp.6077.
Gagne, E.D. 1985. The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning. Boston.
Little Brown. Gay L. R., Mills Geoffrey E. and Airasian Peter W. 2012. Educational
Research Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Pearson Education, Inc: the United States of America.
Gilakjan Pourhosein Abbas and Ahmadi Masoumeh Seyedeh. 2011. The
Relationship between L2 Reading Comprehension and Schema Theory: A Matter of Text Familiarity. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 1, No. 2.
92
Goodman, K. 1998. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist. 6: pp.126-135.
Hadianto. 2011. The Students’ Core Competencies Development at
University: A Comparative Study Between National University of Malaysia and Indonesia. A Ph.D. Unpublished Dissertation. Faculty of Education. UKM.Bangi.
Hamra, A. 1996. Developing questioning competencies through radio
reading. Journal Jaringan. 1 (3): pp.195-199. Harmer, J. 2001. How to Teach English. England: Longman Limited. Howard, D. 1985. Cognitive Psychology. New York: Mackmilan. Hui et al. 2007. Analysis of schema theory and its influence on reading.
Volume 5, No.11 (Serial No.50). US-China Foreign Language, ISSN1539-8080, USA.
Jack C. Richards and Richard Schmidt. 2002. Longman Dictionary Of
Language Teaching And Applied Linguistics: New york. Jalilehvand Maryam and Samuel Moses. 2015. Content Familiarity and
Gender-Neutral Texts in Foreign Language Reading Comprehension. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science Volume 2, Issue 3.
Jitendra, A. K., & Gajria, M. 2011. Reading comprehension instruction for
students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children. 43(8), 1-16.
Johnson, P.1981. Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of text. TESOL Quarterly 15: 169-181. Julie S. Amberg and Deborah J. Vause. Introduction: What is language?:
Cambridge University Press. Accessed at www.cambridge.org Retrieved on 2nd October 2016.
Kehoe Jerard. 1995. Practical assessment research and evaluation.
Volume 4, access on http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=4&n=10 Retrieved on 15th October 2016.
Kennedy, L. D., & Halinski, R. S. 1978. Measuring attitudes: An
extradimension. Journal of Reading, 18,518-522.
93
Koda, K. 2005. Insights into Second Language Reading: A cross-Linguistic
Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kusumi vasantha Dhanapala. 2010. Sri Lankan University Students’
Metacognitive Awareness of L2 Reading Strategies. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, Vo1.l6, No.1, pp. 65-82.
Kweldju, S. 2001. Vocabulary and lexicogramatical unit: Graduate
students’ main problems in reading their textbooks. Journal Ilmiah Masyarakat Linguistic Indonesia. 1, pp.35-56.
Lande S. K. & Astuti E. M. 2013. Forward for vocational school grade XI.
Erlangga: Jakarta. Lie, Anita. 2007. Education policy and EFL curriculum in Indonesia:
between the commitment to competence and the quest for higher test scores. TEFLIN Journal, Volume 18, Number 1, February 2007.
Lie Jia-Ying. 2011. Second language reading topic familiarity and Test
score: test-taking strategies for multiple-choicecomprehension questions. available at Iowa Research Online: http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/2737.
Lie, K. Yew. & Kell, P. (2006). Language, literacy and education in diverse
contexts: theory, research and practice. 3L Journal of Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, 11 1-13.
Lincoln Yvonna, & Guba Egon G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. In Moleong,
L.J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung. P.T. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mahmoudi Soheil, Mahmoudi Asgar. 2017. Can Topic Familiarity Override
Language Proficiency in Reading Comprehension?. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 496-506, May 2017 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.07.
Mansfield Gillian. 2012. The English as a Foreign Language / Lingua Franca Debate: Sensitising Teachers of English as a Foreign Language Towards Teaching English as a Lingua Franca. Vol. 14, No. 1,April 2012. ISSN 1657-0790. Bogotá, Colombia. Pages 159-172.. Retrieved on 15th October 2016.
Mappiasse Syamsinar Sitti & Sihes Johari Ahmad. 2014. Evaluation of
English as a Foreign Language and Its Curriculum in Indonesia: A
94
Review. Canadian Center of Science and Education. Vol. 7, No. 10; 2014: ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750
Merriam B. Sharan. 2009. Research A Guide to Design and
Implementation Revised and Expanded from Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. the United States of America: jossey-Bass.
Mikulecky Beatrice S. 2008. Teaching Reading in a Second Language.
Accessed at http://www.longmanhomeusa.com/content/FINAL-LO%20RES-Mikulecky-Reading%20Monograph%20.pdf Retrieved on 15th October 2016.
Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. 2012.
Garis-Garis Besar Program Pembinaan SMK tahun 2012. Jakarta. Natthicha Chansri. 2008. A Relationship between Topic Familiarity,
Gender Differences,Vocabulary, and English Reading Comprehension of Students at the University Level in Thailand. Master thesis, M. A. (English). Bangkok: Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University.
O’Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. 1999. Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. USA: Cambridge University Press. Pang, S. et al. 2003. Teaching Reading. Brussels: International Academy
of Education (IAE).
Pardo. 2004. The effect of ESL students’ perceptions of their cognitive strategies on reading achievement. TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), pp.146-150.
Perason, P.D. 1985. Changing the face of reading comprehension
instruction. Professional Development Service for The Teacher. 2012. Guiding
Comprehension Teaching for Meaning. Accessed at . http://www.pdst.ie/node/ 482 Retrieved on 15th October 2015
O’Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. 1999. Learning Stratgies in Second
Language Acquisition. USA. Cambridge University Press. Rabinowitz, M & Chi, M.T. 1987. An Interactive Model of Strategic
Processing. In O’Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. 1999. Learning Strategies in Second language Acquisition. Oxford. OUP.
95
Randy Elliott Bennett. 2003. Online Assessment and the Comparability of
Score Meaning. ETS research prior to publication https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-03-05-Bennett.pdf Retrieved on 15th October 2015.
Richards, J.C. 1983. Listening comprehension: Approach, design,
procedure. TESOL Quartyerly. 17, pp. 219-239. ____________. 2008. Teaching Listening and Speaking From Theory to
Practice. Cambridge University Press: the United States of America.
Roediger H.L. 2003. Introduction Biographical Detail Remembering.
Washington University, ST Louis, Missouri, USA. Rumelhart E. David, Norman A. Donal. 1976. Accretion, Tuning And
Restructuring: Three Modes Of Learning. University Of California, San Diego.
Shanahan, T., et al. 2010. Improving reading comprehension in
kindergarten through 3rd grade: Apractice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education valuation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department Of Education.
Schofield, H. 1980. Reading attitude and achievement: Teacher-pupil
relationships. Journal of Educational Research, 74,111-119. Snow C. E. (2010). Reading Comprehension: Reading for Learning.
Accessed at http://www.cal.org/create/conferences/2012/ pdfs/reading-comprehension.pdf Retrieved on 2nd Mei 2017.
Someren, Maarten W. et al. 1994. A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Process. London: Academic Press.
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Syatriana, E. 1998. The Levels of Reading Comprehension of the Fifth
Semester Students of STKIP YPUP Makassar. Unpublished Sarjana Thesis. Makassar.
96
Tankersley Karen. 2003. The Threads Of Reading Strategies For Literacy Development. Alexadria, Virginia USl/A: The Association For Supervision And Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. M., & Therriault, D. 2003. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66. Watter K. et al. 2016. Treating reading comprehension deficits in sub-
acute brain injury rehabilitation: identifying clinical practice and management. Journal of Communication Disorders http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.07.006.
Weijer C, Goldsand G, Emanuel EJ. 1999. Protecting communities in
research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nature Genetics; 23 (3), pp.275-80.
Welianti, Vera. 2015. The Effectiveness Of Students’ Reading
Comprehension Achievement Of Narrative Text Through Schema Activation Strategy At The First Year Of Sman 1 Seputih. University Of Lampung Bandar Lampung: Thesis.
Whitehead, J. 2008. The British Council and English Language in East Asia: Setting the Context. In Primary Innovations Regional Seminar. A collection of papers. Hanoi: The British Council.
Wierisma, W. 2000. Research Method in Education: An Introduction. Nedham Heights: Allin & Bacon.
Wittrock, M. C. 1992. Knowledge Acquisition and Comprehension. In M. C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of educational research. Sixth Edition. pp. 699-705. New York: Macmillan.
Yousef Hadieh et al,. 2014. The Relationship Between Culture
Background And Reading Comprehention. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 707-714.
Yuniarti, Eko. 2013. Improving The Students’ Reading Comprehension
Through Know-Want-Learn Technique At The Eleventh Grade Of Sma Negeri 1 Sanden In The Academic Year Of 2012/2013. State University of Yogyakarta.
Zhang, L.J. 2001. Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012. Published online 6 January 2012.
98
Appendix 1 :The List of the Topic
NO. TOPIC FAMILIARITY UNFAMILIARITY REASON
1 Travelling
2 Transportation
3 Tourism
4 Business
5 Politics
6 Media and Communication
7 Gender
8 Language
9 Music
10 Technology
11 Sport
12 LGBT
13 Global Warming
14 Health
15 Computer
16 Agriculture
99
Appendix 2 : Reading text
The Visual basic programming
Microsoft’s Visual Basic is an evolution of the BASIC
programming language that is designed to be used with a richly
featured programming interface called an Integrated Development
Environment (IDE). Prior to the development of IDEs, programming
with languages like BASIC relied heavily upon the DOS command-
line. Programmers were required to write out their code manually
and use DOS to compile their programs into executable files a
somewhat arduous process with much room for error. An IDE,
however, simplifies the process dramatically by providing a unified
interface that facilitates coding and allows one-click compilation into
an executable file.
Coding with an IDE can be done manually or by dragging and
dropping popular commands and procedures. This is a significant
difference from languages like C++ where the user is responsible for
writing code from scratch. The IDE can also check for potential
errors in code and suggest improvements and corrections. Because
of its simplicity, Visual Basic tends to be very approachable for
beginning programmers interested in writing simple programs.
As a programming language designed by Microsoft, Visual Basic is
used primarily in a Windows environment for writing system-specific
applications. In 2008, Microsoft implemented Visual Basic within its
.NET framework, dubbing the new release Visual Basic .NET. For
many users, however, it is worth pointing out that Visual Basic .NET
is often still referred to as Visual Basic today for simplicity.
Visual Basic for Applications is not an entirely different
language from Visual Basic. Rather, as the name suggests, VBA is a
specialized implementation of the Visual Basic language that is
designed to be used within existing applications. Often bundled with
Microsoft applications like the Office Suite and third-party programs
like AutoCAD, VBA is designed to provide simple programming
options to extend the functionality of popular programs.
The key word is “extend.” VBA cannot compile into a system
executable file on its own. Rather, it requires an interpreter to read
the “P-code” created through the compilation process. A VBA
program can be embedded in a Microsoft Word document, for
example, but cannot stand on its own as a program run from the
100
Windows Start Menu. For users wishing to write programs from
scratch, Visual Basic would normally be used rather than VBA.
As with other intermediate language environments like Java, VBA
suffers a speed disadvantage when compared to the native
programs written in Visual Basic. The reason for this is that VBA
requires the additional step of interpretation by another program.
The extra steps and corresponding system resources required to
execute VBA programs mean that VBA is normally not used if speed
is an issue.
As you learn more about programming in Windows, you will
likely continue to return to Visual Basic as a simple and accessible
way to write basic programs. Any experience with VBA, however, is
likely to depend on whether or not you tend to use programs that can
be used with VBA, such as Microsoft Word or Excel. You will benefit
not only from an understanding of languages like Visual Basic, but
the countless applications of computer programming that can help
advance your career.
CHOOSE THE CORRECT ANSWER
1. Primary purpose of the passage is to…………..
a. Educate the reader about the development of visual basic
b. Compare visual basic and another language programming
c. Relate the problems if the programmer don’t understand visual
basic
d. Explain why a visual basic is important for Technician
2. The author’s tone in the passage is best described as…
a. Informative
b. Opinionated
c. Concerned
d. Passionate
3. In the passage, framework was used by visual basic is…
a. .DOS b. .NET c. .C++ d. .DOC
4. The advantages of visual basic when we compare with another
programming are….
I. Visual Basic have feature programming interface called
IDE
II. Facilitate encoding
III. compiling their programs into executable files
a. I , II, III c. III only
101
b. II only d. I and III
5. In the passage, there is no the differences between Visual Basic
for Applications and Visual Basic because…..
I. The special implementation language in Visual Basic has
been designed in Visual Basic for Applications.
II. VBA is designed as programming options to extend the
functionality of popular programs.
III. VBA often bundled with Microsoft applications.
a. I only c. II and III
b. II only d. I, II, and III
6. According to the passage, which of the following statements is
true?
a. Visual basic for intermediate level of programmer
b. Visual Basic for Applications can compile a system
executable file by its own.
c. Visual Basic for Applications needthe interpreter to read
the “P-code”.
d. Visual basic, Visual Basic for Applications and java are the
same programming language.
7. From the passage, we can conclude that………..
a. Visual basic cannot be separated from beginner of programmer
b. Understanding language programming can success in your
carrier
c. Long process to become programmer
d. Using visual basic for Applications for starting
programming.
8. What is the function of IDE?
a. To avoid errors
b. Adding the features in programming
c. To check for potential errors in code
d. Starting the programming
9. “it requires an interpreter to read the “P-code” created
through the compilation process” (paragraph 4)
The word interpreter closet meaning with……
a. English teacher
b. Translator
c. Presenter
d. Traveler
10. What is the reason if you learn programming in windows, you
returned to Visual Basic?
102
a. Because visual basic as regeneration Visual Basic for
Applications.
b. Because visual basic often bundled with Microsoft
applications.
c. Because visual basic is simple and accessible way to write basic
programs.
d. Because visual basic has IDE
Source: https://www.floridatechonline.com/blog/information-technology/programming-languages-
visual-basic-and-visual-basic-for-applications/
103
Appendix 3 : Reading text
The Incredible Flea
Fleas are perfectly designed by nature to feast on anything
containing blood. Like a shark in the water or a wolf in the woods, fleas are
ideally equipped to do what they do, making them very difficult to defeat.
The bodies of these tiny parasites are extremely hard and well suitable for
their job.
A flea has very hard exoskeleton, which means the body is covered
by a tough, tile like plate called a “Sclerite”. Because of these plates, fleas
are almost impossible to squish. The exoskeletons of fleas are also
waterproof and shock resistant, and therefore fleas are highly resistant to
the sprays and chemicals used to kill them.
Little spines are attached to this plate. The spines lie flat against the
flea’s thin, narrow body as the flea scurries through an animal’s fur in
search of food. However, if anything (like fingers or self-grooming pet) tries
to pull a flea of through the hair coat, these spines will extend and stick o
the fur like Velcro.
Flea are some of the best jumpers in the natural world. A flea can
jump seven inches, or 150 times its own length, either vertically or
horizontally. An equivalent jump for person would be 555 feet, the height
of the Washington monument. Fleas can jump 30.000 times in a row
without stopping, and they are able to accelerate through the air at an
incredibly high rate-a rate which is over ten times what humans can
withstand in airplane.
Fleas have very long rear legs with huge thigh muscles and multiple
joints. When they get ready to jump, they fold their long legs up and
crouch like a runner on starting block. Several of their joints contain a
protein called “Resilin” which help catapult fleas into the air as they jump,
similar to the way a rubber band provides momentum to a slingshot.
104
Outward facing claws on the bottom of their legs grip anything they touch
when they land.
The Adult female flea mates after her first blood meal and begins
producing eggs in just 1 to 2 days. One flea can lay up to 50 eggs in one
day and over 2000 in her lifetime. Flea eggs can be seen with the naked
eye, but they are about the size of grain of salt. Shortly, after being laid,
the eggs begin to transform into cocoons. In the cocoons state, fleas are
fully developed adult, and will hatch immediately if conditions are
favorable. Fleas can detect warmth, movement, and carbon dioxide in
exhaled breath, and these three factor stimulate them to emerge as new
adults. If the flea does not detect appropriate conditions, it can remain
dormant in the cocoon state for extended periods. Under ideal conditions,
the entire life cycle may only take 3 weeks, so in no time at all, pets and
homes can become infested. Because of these characteristics, fleas are
intimidating opponents. The best away to control fleas, therefore, is to take
step to prevent an infestation from ever occurring.
11. Primary purpose of the passage is to…………..
e. Educate the reader about the physical characteristics of fleas
f. Compare fleas to other members of the animal kingdom
g. Relate the problems that can result from a flea infestation
h. Explain why a flea infestation is hard to get rid of
12. The author’s tone in the passage is best describe as…
a. Concerned
b. Passionate
c. Informative
d. opinionated
13. according to the passage, fleas are resistant to sprays and
chemicals because they…..
a. have waterproof “sclerites”
b. are excellent jumpers
105
c. reproduce very rapidly
d. can stick to fur like Velcro
14. fleas are difficult to squish because they have:
I. sclerites
II. tough spines
III. resilin in their joints
a. I only c. II and III only
b. I and II only d. I , II and III
15. according to the passage, fleas are able to jump:
I. with a high rate of acceleration
II. up and down and from side to side
III. because the blood they eat contain resilin
a. I only c. II and III only
b. I and II only d. I , II and III
16. according to the passage, which of the following statements is true?
a. Fleas extend their the little spines if threatened.
b. Fleas have the ability to jump higher than humans.
c. Humans can jump higher if they consume foods containing
resilin.
d. The resilin found in fleas is used in fleas is used to make rubber
bands.
17. Based on information in the passage, the reader can understand
that ……..
a. Fleas will die without access to blood
b. Fleas survive at a higher rate in outdoor habitats
c. Flies will die after they produce 2.000 eggs
d. Newly hatched fleas are the size of grain of salt
18. The author mentions the Washington monument in order to….
a. Estimate the extreme distance that a flea is able to jump
b. Illustrate a comparison made between fleas and humans
c. Clarify a point made regarding fleas and acceleration
106
d. Demonstrate the superiority of flies over humans
19. It can be inferred that fleas will emerge from eggs as adults………
a. When they out grow the cocoon
b. After a period of 3 weeks
c. When they sense there is access to blood
d. If there is too much carbon dioxide in the cocoon
20. Using the information in the passage as a guide, it can be
concluded….
a. Humans do not possess the physical characteristics of the flea
because they have no use for them.
b. Human do not pay much attention to fleas because they do not
pose a serious threat.
c. Fleas have many physical advantages, although there are
outweighed by their many disadvantages.
d. Fleas are designed in such a way as to give them unique
physical advantages in life.
Source: (Lade S. K. & Astuti Eka Mulya: 20013)
107
Appendix 4 : Questionnaire
LEARNER 1 Topic "The Visual basic programming "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Visual basic programming " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Visual basic programming"
Familiar dengan anda?
Jawaban
1. Iya, saya tahu dengan Bahasa Pemrograman Visual...
2. Karna saya sering memakai salah satu aplikasi di antara berbagai
macam Bahasa Pemrograman Visual, yakni Bahasa C++ yang di buat
dalam Aplikasi Dev C++... aplikasi ini saya pakai di dalam salah satu mata
kuliah Pemrograman Terstruktur saya pada semester ini
Topic "The Incredible Flea "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Incredible Flea " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Incredible Flea " Familiar
dengan anda?
jawaban
1. Saya baru mendengar tentang topik ini, jadi saya tidak terlalu familiar
2. alasan saya mengatakan bahwa saya tdk terlalu familiar karna mungkin
saya jarang membaca tentang hal-hal biologis atau mungkin dikarnakan
hal tersebut kurang menarik untuk saya cari tahu
108
LEARNER 2
Topic "The Visual basic programming "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Visual basic programming " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Visual basic programming"
Familiar dengan anda?
Jawaban
1. iya sangat familiar
2. karena visual basic adalah ilmu dasar yang kami gunakan
untuk membuat program sederhana dan aplikasi visual basic
mudah digunakan. Ilmu ini duajarkan awal semester masuk
sekolah.
Topic "The Incredible Flea "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Incredible Flea " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Incredible Flea " Familiar
dengan anda?
Jawaban
1. Tidak familiar
2. Karena tidak pernah saya pelajari atau jumpai sebelumnya materi
tersebut sebelumnya. Disiplin ilmu computer tidak mempelajari
tentang ilmu tersebut.
109
LEARNER 3
Topic "The Visual basic programming "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Visual basic programming " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Visual basic programming"
Familiar dengan anda?
Jawaban
1.iya familiar.
2.karena visual basic sudah diperkenalkan sejak awal meskipun
tidak terlalu dikuasai. Visual basic juga merupakan dasar pembuatan
program dalam ilmu computer.
Topic "The Incredible Flea "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Incredible Flea " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Incredible Flea " Familiar
dengan anda?
Jawaban
1.tidak familiar
2.karena saya tidak pernah mendengar atau menjumpa materi
tersebut karena tidak dipelajari disekolah, saya biasa mendengar
perkembangan kupu-kupu saja, tapi kalau kutu tidak pernah saya
jumpai.
110
LEARNER 4 Topic "The Visual basic programming "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Visual basic programming " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Visual basic programming"
Familiar dengan anda?
Jawaban
1. iya sangat familiar
2. karena topik ini sesuai dengan jurusan saya, sehingga ketika saya
menemukan topik tentang materi visual basic sudah ada gambara-
gambaran umum tentang dasar aplikasi pembuatan program oleh
seorang programming. Selain itu bagi programming atau jurusan
computer rekayasa perangkat lunak sangat menarik membaca
tentang dasar –dasar dari visual basic dan pemahaman saya harus
mendalam karena merupakan dasar membuat program yang juga
jurusan saya..
Topic "The Incredible Flea "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Incredible Flea " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Incredible Flea " Familiar
dengan anda?
jawaban
1. tidak familiar
2. karena materi tersebut memiliki istilah-istilah ilmiah yang tidak
dipelajari, bahkan tidak pernah kami jumpai sebelumnya,
sehingga tidak diketahui apa artinya. Berbeda dengan visual
basic yang merupakan jurusan saya, selalu saya gunakan.
111
LEARNER 5
Topic "The Visual basic programming "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Visual basic programming " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Visual basic programming"
Familiar dengan anda?
jawaban
1. Ya sangat familiar.
2. Karena materi tersebut adalah tentang bahasa pemrograman yang
merupakan salah satu bahasa tingkat tinggi yang mengumpulkan
sintaks dan simantik yang digunakan manusia untuk memudahkan
karyanya dalam membuat program di komputer. Dan itu adalah
jurusan saya sebagai siswa jurusan computer tepatnya rekayasa
perangkat lunak
Topic "The Incredible Flea "
1. apa topik bacaan dengan judul "The Incredible Flea " adalah familiar menurut anda? 2. apa alasan anda mengatakan topik "The Incredible Flea " Familiar
dengan anda?
Jawaban:
1.saya baru mendengar dan tidak familiar dengan topic itu
2. karena saya baru pertama kali membaca topic ini dan banyak kata yang
saya tidak pahami.