Post on 07-May-2023
STRUCTURALDETACHMENTSINLIME-BASEDWALLPAINTINGS:CAUSES,IDENTIFICATIONMETHODSAND
DECISION-MAKING–CASESTUDYOFMARIACHURCH,NISSE
MScThesisinConservationandRestorationofCulturalHeritage|HistoricInterior
Name:ValentinaGatto|StudentNo°:11445351|Date:08/2020
ContactEmailAddress:valentina.gatto@student.uva.nl
Supervisor:MerelSchrojensteinLantmanMA|PDRes
SecondReader:Dr.HermandenOtter
ExternalRCEAdvisors:BerniceCrijns,RutgerMorelissen
STRUCTURAL DETACHMENTS IN WALL PAINTINGS: CAUSES, METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION
AND DECISION-MAKING – CASE STUDY OF MARIA CHURCH, NISSE.
M.Sc. Thesis
Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage, Historic Interiors
Author: Valentina Gatto
Student No°: 11445351
Contact Email Address: valentina.gatto@student.uva.nl
Thesis Supervisor: Merel Schrojenstein Lantman MA|PDRes
Second Reader: Dr. Herman den Otter
External RCE Advisors: Bernice Crijns, Rutger Morelissen
Word Count (pp. 6-79 and 88), excluding figure captions and tables: 17997
University of Amsterdam
Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed | Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands
Original version submitted on: 24/08/2020
Cover: Visible light photography of the wall paintings representing the coronation (centre) and the annunciation of
Mary (left) and the Tree of Jesse (right) on the triumphal arch in Maria Church. Photo Credit: The Cultural Heritage
Agency of the Netherlands (RCE) and Jorien Duivenvoorden.
P A G E | 2
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S _____________________________________________________________________________ 5
A B S T R A C T ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 6
S A M E N V A T T I N G _____________________________________________________________________________________ 6
1. Introducution ________________________________________________________________________________________ 7
1.1. Research focus __________________________________________________________________________________ 7
1.2. Relevance to the field___________________________________________________________________________ 8
2. Case study: maria church and the wall paintings _____________________________________________ 10
2.1. Brief history and iconography _______________________________________________________________ 12
2.2. Composite materials and techniques ________________________________________________________ 18
2.3. Previous conservation treatments___________________________________________________________ 18
2.4. Current condition of the wall paintings _____________________________________________________ 19
2.5. Environmental parameters in maria church ________________________________________________ 24
3. Causes and description of structural detachments in wall paintings ______________________ 25
3.1. Description ___________________________________________________________________________________ 25
3.2. Intrinsic causes _______________________________________________________________________________ 28
3.2.1. Instability of materials ____________________________________________________________________ 29
3.2.2. Defective application of materials and technique________________________________________ 30
3.2.3. Geological condition and composition of the ground ____________________________________ 31
3.3. Environmental factors _______________________________________________________________________ 32
3.3.1. Frost damage ______________________________________________________________________________ 33
3.3.2. Migration and re-crystallisation of soluble salts _________________________________________ 33
3.3.3. Chemical deterioration ____________________________________________________________________ 39
3.3.4. Fungi and biodeterioration _______________________________________________________________ 41
3.4. Extrinsic causes _______________________________________________________________________________ 42
3.4.1. Adverse effects of previous conservation treatments ___________________________________ 43
3.4.2. The influence of vibrations________________________________________________________________ 44
3.5. Conclusion ____________________________________________________________________________________ 45
4. Methods of identification of structural detachments ________________________________________ 46
4.1. Visual approach and percussion method ____________________________________________________ 46
4.1.1. Discussion _________________________________________________________________________________ 47
P A G E | 3
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
4.2. Infrared thermography (IRT) ________________________________________________________________ 49
4.2.1. Passive thermography ____________________________________________________________________ 49
4.2.2. Active thermography ______________________________________________________________________ 49
4.2.3. Discussion _________________________________________________________________________________ 50
4.3. Acoustic methods _____________________________________________________________________________ 51
4.3.1. Ultrasonic pulse velocity __________________________________________________________________ 53
4.3.2. Ultrasonic pulse echo______________________________________________________________________ 53
4.3.3. Ultrasonic tomography ____________________________________________________________________ 53
4.3.4. Discussion _________________________________________________________________________________ 54
4.4. Electromagnetic imaging techniques ________________________________________________________ 55
4.4.1. Ground penetrating radar _________________________________________________________________ 56
4.4.2. Therahertz imaging _______________________________________________________________________ 56
4.4.3. Discussion _________________________________________________________________________________ 56
4.5. Digital speckle pattern interferometry (DSPI) ______________________________________________ 58
4.5.1. Discussion _________________________________________________________________________________ 58
4.6. Conclusion ____________________________________________________________________________________ 58
5. Decision-making: determining treatment needs _____________________________________________ 62
5.1. Conservation methodology of structural delamination _____________________________________ 62
5.2. The establishmente of need for structural treatment _______________________________________ 62
5.2.1. Injection grouting: risks and limitations _______________________________________________ 62
5.3. Development of decision-making model_____________________________________________________ 62
5.4 Prototype of decision-making model ________________________________________________________ 62
6. Maria Church and the wall paintings: a revision ______________________________________________ 73
6.1. Potential causes of structural delamination ________________________________________________ 73
6.2. Suitable methods for the identification of structural delamination ________________________ 75
6.3. Structural delamination: How to determine treatment needs? ____________________________ 77
7. Conclusion and further research________________________________________________________________ 78
8. Reference list ______________________________________________________________________________________ 80
8.1. Books, chapters of edited books, journal articles, conference papers and dissertations _ 80
8.2. Website contents and unpublished documents _____________________________________________ 86
S U M M A R Y _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 88
Appendix I: Iconography of the wall paintings in Maria Church _______________________________________ 89
P A G E | 4
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Appendix II: Local newspaper ‘Provinciale Zeeuwse Courant’ _________________________________________ 91
Appendix III: History and restoration history of Maria Church ________________________________________ 93
Appendix IV: SEM-EDX of samples no 1,2 and 3 _______________________________________________________ 97
Appendix V: Introduction to composite materials in wall paintings __________________________________ 104
Appendix VI: Moisture passage through porous building materials __________________________________ 106
Appendix VII: Questions of the prototype of decision-making model ________________________________ 109
Appendix VIII: Glossary _________________________________________________________________________________ 113
P A G E | 5
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S
Desperate times call for exceptionally long acknowledgments; writing a thesis during a pandemic is a
remarkably challenging task that can only be combined with a list of thanks just as significant. This
thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and supports of many supervisors,
colleagues and friends: I would like to extend my gratitude to everyone who helped me and listened
to me. I would like to start by thanking my supervisor, Merel Schrojenstein Lantman for helping me
finalising the subject of this thesis both the first time and also post COVID-19; her suggestions on how
to re-establish a meaningful research focus for this thesis have been unique and her through guidance
during this whole process has been just priceless.
Furthermore, I would like to express my gratitude to my external RCE advisor, Bernice Crijns, for
introducing me to the complex subject of structural delamination in wall paintings and for presenting
me the suitable case study of the wall paintings in Maria Church that allowed me the opportunity to
place this challenging subject into a realistic context. To Roger Groves from TU Delft, who accepted to
collaborate with me on the future assessment of DSPI and ultrasonic techniques to document
structural delamination in Maria Church and who has always been available whenever I had technical
questions. Gratitude is also due to Rutger Morelissen for his support during the initial phase of
development of this thesis and to Adri Spruit, volunteer at Maria Church, for allowing us to visit the
church..
I would like to thank all tutors, lecturers and professors of the Conservation and Restoration
Department at the UvA, who supported me during the shifting of research focus that had to be
implemented due to the arrival of COVID-19. In particular, I would like to thank: Rene Peschar, for
providing initial feedback and improvements to the structure of this thesis, Miko Vasques Dias, for
taking the time to read this thesis, giving me an insightful list of suggestions to apply and for correcting
some of the typos on the text, Maarten van Bommel and Ella Hendriks, for their constant
encouragement during this project, and Maartje Stols-Witlox for being able to manage the general
COVID-19 chaos, organise useful supporting workshops and for being always available.
I would like to express my gratitude to all my friends, colleagues and family for being there for me
during this peculiar time. Many thanks: to Jasmijn, Edith, Francesca, Laura, Sarah-Jane, Eugenia,
Raffaele, Sara, Antonia and Marjolijn. In conclusion, I would like to thank my mum Rosmarie and my
dad Guido for always supporting me during my studies, my brother Claudio, for always being there
for me and Angelo, for tolerating me during this stressful time and for always being by my side.
P A G E | 6
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
ABSTRACT
Structural detachments in wall paintings: Causes, methods of identification and decision-
making – Case study of Maria Church, Nisse.
Valentina Gatto, University of Amsterdam, August 2020.
Structural detachments in wall paintings are investigated to evaluate potential causes, methods of
identification and means of determining their treatments needs. The case study of the wall paintings
of Maria Church exemplifies the relevance of analysing this topic. Lastly, a prototype of decision-
making model to approach the conservation of this phenomenon is introduced.
SAMENVATTING
Structurele delaminatie van muurschilderingen: Oorzaken, identificatiemethodes en
besluitvorming – Casestudy van Mariakerk, Nisse.
Valentina Gatto, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Augustus 2020.
Structurele delaminatie van muurschilderingen zijn onderzocht om potentiële oorzaken,
identificatiemethodes en manieren om de benodigdheden voor hun behandeling te evalueren. De
casestudy van de muurschilderingen van de Mariakerk illustreert de relevantie van het analyseren
van dit onderwerp. Ten slotte is een prototype van het besluitvormingsmodel geïntroduceerd voor
het behoud van dit fenomeen.
P A G E | 7
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
1. INTRODUCUTION
Delamination or detachments are terms implemented to indicate the presence of a decaying process
that is gradually causing the loss of adhesion and cohesion of heterogeneous layers in the structure of
wall paintings, resulting in the partial separation between plaster layers, pictorial layers and their
support (Wang 2011, 121; Fricke-Begemann, Gu, and Joost 2000, 538). Currently, common
conservation approaches are based on the identification of areas of delamination and their remedial
conservation treatment, often involving the injection of either lime-based or other synthetic grouts
(Biçer-Şimşir and Rainer 2011; Biçer-Şimşir et al. 2009; Pasian et al. 2018). This procedure is
frequently described in the literature as an obvious treatment and very little explanation and
justification of such choice are provided (Rainer et al. 2017, 10, 71; Rickerby et al. 2004, 471–77;
Tringham et al. 2013, 94-95; Asp 2001, 41-44; Suneson 2001, 45-51). Moreover, the evaluation of the
structural integrity of wall paintings is usually based on the localisation of delaminated areas by
means of subjective and empirical methods such as the percussion approach (Preusser 1991, 4;
Hinsch et al. 2009, 96; Guelker, Hinsch, and Joost 2001, 188; Tornari et al. 2013, 4; More and Philippot
1968, 170). The need for a more scientific method to identify and characterize delamination in wall
paintings has been expressed since the 1960’s (Preusser 1991, 4) and generated into an area of
research involving the use (sometimes combined) of: IRT (Infrared Thermography), DSPI (Digital
Speckle Pattern Interferometry), ultrasound and other forms of non-destructive techniques.
Therefore, interests for the overall assessment of possible causes and identification methods of
structural detachment in lime-based wall paintings spawned from the case study of the mural
paintings in Maria Church in Nisse: despite injection grouting, the structural condition of the
aforementioned wall paintings appear quite poor. This case study is considered to extensively
illustrate the current problematics encountered in conservation practice. Usually, the identification of
causes, location and progress of detachments is based on approximate methods that can generate
conflict results. Consequently, their remedial treatment is rarely justified and their long-term effects
need to be evaluated.1
1.1. RESEARCH FOCUS
The main goal of this research project is to obtain an insightful understanding of the process of
formation of structural detachments, the current methods of their identification, and how, by
exploiting case specific factors (such as; previous conservation treatments, environmental parameters
and in situ logistics) specific treatment needs can be determined. Conventionally, conservation
1 For the sake of simplicity, the term lime-based wall paintings has been shortened into wall paintings throughout
this thesis. Therefore, whilst lime-based wall paintings are the main core of this research, several general notions
can be pertinent to wall paintings of different structural composition. Consult the glossary in Appendix VIII.
P A G E | 8
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
treatments of wall paintings were based on preconceived assumptions about condition and, since
some remedial treatments are believed to have caused additional long-term damages, the necessity of
their implementation, together with their long-term efficacy are brought into question (Kaszewski
2018; Wong and Rickerby 2013; Cather 2003, 412).
Therefore, three main areas of research and related aims were determined: (I) a description of
potential causes associated with structural detachments; (II) an evaluation of traditional and modern
methods of identification of delamination with an overview of associated advantages and
disadvantages; (III) the need for developing a decision-making model to establish specific
treatment needs for structural detachments including risks and limitation of present methods.
Additionally, the case study of the wall paintings in Maria Church exemplifies the need of
investigating the aforementioned areas of research; Chapter 6 elaborates the probable causes,
method of identification of structural detachments and the possibility of implementing a decision-
making model to determine their treatment needs.
Consequently, the resulting research questions were framed:
I. What are the possible causes leading to the formation of structural detachments in lime-
based wall paintings?
II. What are the methods available for the identification of structural detachments in wall
paintings? What are their advantages and disadvantages and are there any possible areas
of research/improvement?
III. How can one determine the treatment needs for structural delamination in wall paintings?
1.2. RELEVANCE TO THE FIELD
Structural delamination affecting heterogeneous layer compounds of wall paintings is a commonly
observed degradation phenomenon (Hinsch et al. 2009, 184). While the nature of their occurrence is
often described, methods for their identification are frequently based on empirical and subjective
approaches, which only provides an approximate indication of the location of detached areas (Lasyk
et al. 2012, 3–4; Hinsch et al. 2009, 96; Fricke-Begemann, Gu, and Joost 2000, 537). Hitherto,
conservation treatments of structural detachments frequently involve the injection (through either
existing or pre-drilled holes) of a variety of adhesive mixtures, with several researches focusing on
the evaluation of methods and materials (Biçer-Şimşir and Rainer 2011; Biçer-Şimşir et al. 2009;
Pasian et al. 2018; Biçer-Şimşir and Rainer 2014). Generally, conservation treatments of this
phenomenon are considered to be executed rather ‘blindly’, with a great lack of description of
decision-making, reasoning and justification of the choice for injection grouting (Mancinelli 1991, 56-
66; Rainer et al. 2017, 10, 71; Asp 2001, 41-44; Suneson 2001, 45-51).
P A G E | 9
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Since the identification and consequent consolidation of structural delamination are considered the
most urgent and difficult problems in the field of wall paintings conservation, further understanding
of the formation process of this phenomenon and an evaluation of its specific treatment needs are at
the core of this research.
P A G E | 10
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
2. CASE STUDY: MARIA CHURCH AND THE WALL PAINTINGS
Maria Church is a protestant church, built during the first half of the fifteenth century (St.Mary’s
church Nisse 2020). The church, a brick building constructed in the shape of a cross, has been
registered as a national monument since 1967 (see Table 2.1) (RCE National Monument Register
2020). Maria Church is located in the picturesque village of Nisse, in Zeeland, part of the municipality
of Borsele (Fig.2.1,2.2). The church adorns and dominates, with its majestic presence, the square of
the small village of Nisse, Dorpsplein conveying an atmosphere of grandeur to its landscape.
Nowadays, the church has retained its original religious function; weekly church services occur in
collaboration with two other protestant churches (in 's-Heer Abtskerke and in Hoedekenskerke, both
in Zeeland) and joint services are held occasionally.
In addition to the already established historical, national and sentimental significance attributed to
Maria Church, the discovery of a cycle of wall paintings during a restoration campaign in the 1920s,
conveyed further artistic, educational and research values to the church. The study of the iconography
and themes depicted in the wall paintings together with their dating, identification of material
composition, degradation phenomena and conservation treatments were central subjects of two other
conservation campaigns (executed in the 1980s and in 2017 respectively) and a more recent
diagnostic investigation, carried out by the RCE in 2019. Therefore, these mural paintings represented
an ideal case study for the purpose of this research project; the presence of detachments appeared to
be a phenomena affecting the structure of the wall paintings since their uncovering in the 1920s
(Crijns, Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020).
Fig.2.1, 2.2: Location of Maria Church in Nisse, Zeeland and its rear elevation. Photo credit:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mariakerk_(Nisse)6.JPG
P A G E | 11
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Table 2.1. Building and Monument Identification
Name of Building Maria Church, Dorpsplein 49, Nisse
Address Dorpsplein 49, 4443 AG Nisse
Status of the
Building National monument
Monument
Number 10008
Cadastral
Part/Number 1578/77
Description
Gothic cross church; single-aisle nave approx. 1425, choir second half of the
15th century, south transept approx. 1500, northern transept a few decades
later. Arched vestry somewhat later than the choir. Interior: between the
nave and the choir a low narrow triumphal arch of the older choir can be
observed together with carved apostle figures under the ribs of the choir
vault. Both ribs and wall studs are painted. Mural on the triumphal
arch: The Holy Trinity, Tree of Jesse and Annunciation. Wall painting on the
north side of the ship: approx. 1430 St. Christopher. Late gothic carved gate
on the north transept approx. 1525. Bench with gothic panel work and
shield-bearing lions approx. 1500. Fences in the ship and in the south arm,
1st half 17th century. Richly carved pulpit 1679.
Function and
Current Use Religious building, Protestant church, Dutch Reformed church
Owner of the
Building Municipality of Borsele
P A G E | 12
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
2.1. BRIEF HISTORY AND ICONOGRAPHY Maria Church was built in the fifteenth century, as a replacement of a much older church, which was
demolished in 1425 (St.Mary’s church Nisse 2020). Consequently, the construction of Maria Church is
known to have started right after 1425, and is believed to have lasted almost one hundred years. The
present church, which is the result of several expansions and reconstructions, consists of: (I) a nave,
original architectural element dating from a time lapse between 1425 and 1525; (II) a choir, a fifteenth
century expansion most likely to have occurred after the completion of the church in 1525,
presumably commissioned by Hendrik II Van Borselen, who requested the addition with the aim of
creating a more sophisticated church, that would have reflected his high status; (III) a transept, an
early sixteenth century addition; (IV) a tower, which underwent invasive modifications during a
restoration in 1805 (such as the removal of three pinnacles).
The attribution of a date to the wall painting in Maria Church appears to be somewhat problematic as
no historical records of their creation have been found: their origin is assumed to be dated around the
second half of the fifteenth century, approximately during the extension of the church commissioned
by Van Borselen. Therefore, a speculated connection between the lord and the creation of the wall
paintings in Maria Church can be expressed. Moreover, the whitewashing of the paintings presumably
occurred during the second half of the sixteenth century, during the Protestant Reformation (Crijns,
Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020). The cycle of wall paintings in Maria Church consists of two
wall paintings, depicting a total of four religious themes: three scenes portraying the Coronation of
Mary, the Tree of Jesse and the Annunciation of Mary are respectively located in the centre, on the
lower right and on the lower left side of the triumphal arch (Fig.2.3,2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9), whilst the
fourth theme represented, St. Christopher, is positioned on the north wall (Fig.2.3,2.4, 2.10) (Crijns,
Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020). A more detailed iconography description of these wall
paintings can be found in Appendix I.
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
P A G E | 13
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Fig.2.3,2.4, 2.5: Floor plan of Maria Church, showing the location of the wall paintings in the arch (red)
and the wall painting on the north wall (blue). Photo credit: Rob Crevecouer and Jorien Duivenvoorden.
P A G E | 14
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.2.6, 2.7: Wall paintings on the triumphal arch in Maria Church in Nisse in 2019 (colour photo) and in 1987 (black and
white). Photo credit: Bernice Crijns and Rutger Morelissen, edited by Valentina Gatto.
P A G E | 15
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.2.8 (A-D): Wall paintings on the triumphal arch, located on the lower right depicting the Annunciation of Mary. A and B are
details of the stained glass window and chequered floor, while C and D are details of Mary and the Archangel Gabriel with remnants
of letters on a nameplate next to his shoulder. Photo credit: Jorien Duivenvoorden, edited by Valentina Gatto.
edited by Valentina Gatto.
B
A
D C
P A G E | 16
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.2.9 (A-D): Wall paintings on the triumphal arch, located on the lower left depicting the Tree of Jesse, each coloured area
correspond to the respective detail picture with matching coloured letter. D shows the representation of King David. B and C
portrays two other ancestors within the Tree of Jesse, together with a burning candle (highlighted in B). A depicts Mary within a
pointed oval, at the top of the tree. Photo credit: Jorien Duivenvoorden, edited by Valentina Gatto.
A
B
C
D
P A G E | 17
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.2.10 (A-D): Wall paintings on the north wall representing St. Christopher, more clearly visible in picture A. The palm trees on
the background and the hermit exiting from a dome building, are visible in B and C. D depicts a detail of a pictorial element at the
bottom of the wall painting. Photo credit: Jorien Duivenvoorden, edited by Valentina Gatto.
A
B C
D
P A G E | 18
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
2.2. COMPOSITE MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUES
The exact material composition and painting technique of the wall paintings in Maria Church are still
somewhat unclear; further research and investigation are necessary to obtain a more in-depth
understanding of the material composition and properties of the structural support of the murals and
to allow the full comprehension of the formation process of structural delamination.
The initial investigation carried out by the RCE in 2019 determined the presence of lime for the
structural support of the wall paintings, although the number of layers, differences in composition and
their respective thickness is still unknown (Crijns, Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020). Analysis of
the samples collected during the first phase of investigation revealed the presence of several layers of
lime plaster with different aggregates, such as sand and, possibly, plant fibres; the last two layers of
plaster appeared to be relatively thinner than the underlying ones, therefore suggesting the presence
of a conventional layered structure of arriccio and intonachino, typical of lime-based wall paintings
(see Chapter 3 and Appendix V)(Mora, Mora and Philippot 1999, 12). The painting technique involved
for the creation of these wall paintings is also unknown. Generally, the presence of frescoes in the
Northern countries is somewhat limited and it can be assumed that the wall paintings in Maria Church
were executed in secco technique. Furthermore, the presence of common soluble salts was detected
on all samples analysed.
2.3. PREVIOUS CONSERVATION TREATMENTS
The wall paintings in Maria Church were discovered by restorer Jacob Por in 1920 and have since
endured two further restoration campaigns, in 1984 and in 2017, and a recent diagnostic investigation
in 2019.
The uncovering of the mural paintings executed by Por presumably entailed the mechanical removal
of concealing whitewash together with the filling of losses and their subsequent pictorial
reintegration. The documentation of this conservation campaign is considered too general and lacking
in useful descriptive details of the treatment executed. However, according to Por, the wall paintings
were ‘treated and preserved’ during restoration. Moreover, water infiltrations on the north wall, on
the roof above the wall painting of St. Christopher and on both sides of the triumphal arch, deemed to
presumably cause damages to both the structure and the pictorial layers of the wall paintings, were
documented and repaired (Crevecoeur 2017).
The second main conservation phase occurred between 1984 and 1986 (Crijns, Morelissen, and
Duivenvoorden 2020). This conservation campaign was executed by conservator John Post and a
team of long-term unemployed, untrained people and is considered the most invasive one.
P A G E | 19
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Conservation treatments involved extensive reintegration of losses by means of tratteggio with the
casein/oil emulsion paint ‘ETA’ from Royal Talens, filling and cleaning with acetic acid (80% in
deionised water). Furthermore, structural detachments were treated by drilling small holes in the
painted surface and the successive injection with a two-component synthetic adhesive. The final
application, over the entire surface of both wall paintings, of a polyvinyl acetate resin named
DupaGrund was carried out with the aim of securing both the original paint and the pictorial
reintegration. This PVA resin is currently sold as an ideal primer for outdoor porous paint systems,
plasters, cement and mortars (Technical data sheet Dupa-grund, n.d.). The overall restoration project
lasted approximately 6 months, and as described on the local newspaper ‘Provinciale Zeeuwse
Courant’ (see Appendix III), a vast number of holes was drilled to allow the injection of the two-
component synthetic adhesive. The identification of such holes results rather difficult, potentially, due
to the current poor state of preservation of the pictorial layers of the murals.
The poor condition of the wall paintings spawned the need for further investigation of the causes of
decay and tests for conservation treatments in 2017. These were executed by Rob Crevecoeur who
documented the presence of structural detachments on both wall paintings by means of percussion
approach. This was executed by implementing a self-made equipment consisting of a flexible rod and
a small steel ball, attached to the rod with a silicone tubing (Rob Crevecoeur, email to author, June 3,
2020). The approach relied on the documentation of the different sounds generated to identify
delaminated areas, after carefully striking the surface of the wall painting with the steel ball (see 4.3).
The additional test of a remedial treatment, which involved the injection of an acrylic adhesive
(thickened Plextol B500 in xylene) through pre-drilled holes was also implemented (Crevecoeur
2017).
Because of the presence of paint flakes and plaster debris found nearby both wall paintings, the RCE
begun an in investigation into the current condition of the murals, the environmental parameters of
the church, the possible causes of decay and whether an effective and sustainable treatment plan could
be developed (Crijns, Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020). A more exhaustive description of the
history and restoration history of Maria Church and its cycle of wall paintings can be found in
Appendix III.
2.4. CURRENT CONDITION OF THE WALL PAINTINGS
The stability of the wall paintings in Maria Church has been the subject of the previous restoration
and diagnostic campaigns carried out since the 1920’s. According to the most recent investigation
performed by the RCE, the structure of the wall paintings is considered rather stable (Crijns,
Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020), whereas opposite opinions have been expressed in the
condition report executed by Crevecoeur (2017). Whilst both documentations agree on the presence
P A G E | 20
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
of active deterioration affecting the pictorial layer of the paintings, these seem to differ on the degree
of structural delamination present. It is striking to observe that the study executed by Crevecoeur
(2017) determined the presence of ninety-six locations of structurally delaminated areas on the wall
paintings on the triumphal arch, whereas only forty-four were detected during the RCE research in
2019 (Crijns, Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020). This remarkable difference was caused by the
implementation of two different percussion methods to identify delaminated areas; the first one
involved the use of a small steel ball whilst the second one was executed by gently tapping the painted
surface with the finger tips. In both cases the acoustic response to the tapping was evaluated as
indicative of the presence or lack of structural detachments. Therefore, due to the presence of
conflicting results, it is currently difficult to determine the level of stability of the wall paintings. This
dilemma is extremely representative of the present problematics encountered in wall painting
conservation practice: the identification of structural detachments is relied on empirical methods,
their conservation approach is hardly ever justified and it usually aims at consolidating damages
without relating these to their possible causes or evaluating the long-term effects on the preservation
of the wall paintings.
The surface appearance of the wall paintings in Maria Church appears heavily affected by previous
restorations: extensive retouching executed in the form of tratteggio are visible, often overlapping
with the original paint (Fig.2.11, 2.12) (Crijns, Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020). Moreover,
numerous infills can be observed, possibly applied to cover previous losses and pre-drilled holes
carried out during the injection grouting of the 1980s. The material composition of this type of infills
was analysed during the RCE investigation and resulted to be gypsum based (Crijns, Morelissen, and
Duivenvoorden 2020).2 The hardness and brittleness of this filling material did not match with the
softness usually associated with gypsum; the addition of an organic adhesive must have been
implemented. The presence of these fillings is considered somewhat problematic: their hardness is
found to have an adverse effect on the original plaster, creating cracks and the loss of original material.
The different reactions of the two materials to fluctuations of relative humidity and moisture passage,
due to differences in porosity and density, might be the associated cause of this phenomenon (see
3.4.1.).
Generally, it could be argued that the current condition of the wall paintings has been severely affected
by both environmental conditions and by previous restorations treatments. Table 2.2 summarises the
different damages and associated triggering cause of the wall paintings on the triumphal arch.
2 See Appendix IV.
P A G E | 21
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Table 2.2. Damages and Decay of the Wall Paintings on the Triumphal Arch
Damage/Decay Area Description Cause
Cracks
Over the entire arch
The number of large cracks (larger
than 3 mm) is limited, most major
cracks were repaired in the 1920s
Environmental
conditions
Centre (Coronation
of Mary)
Vertical crack following historical
filling from 1920 on the right,
causing instability in the plaster at
the bottom of the arch, probably
once caused by sinking in the
foundations
Environmental
conditions
Cracks/Loss of
plaster, paint
Low right side
(Annunciation of
Mary)
Cracks between filling and original
surface, a recent loss of original
plaster is visible in this area, the
filling material is more brittle and
stiffer than the original plaster,
leading to the formation of cracks
and losses
Environmental
conditions/
Previous
restorations
Delamination Over the entire arch
Unstable around the tip of the arch,
cracks and wooden end of the
vaulted ribs
Environmental
conditions/
Previous
restorations/
Inherent faults
Blistering and loss
of plaster, paint
Left side and centre
(Coronation of
Mary, Tree of Jesse)
Causes severe deformation of the
surface topography and losses, only
visible in the original plaster, not on
fillings, probably caused by salt
activity
Environmental
conditions/
Previous
restorations/
Inherent faults
Surface
deformation Over the entire arch
The entire surface appears three-
dimensional and very rough,
possibly connected to salt activity
and structural detachments
Environmental
conditions/
Previous
restorations/
Inherent faults
Salt efflorescence
Left side and centre
(Coronation of
Mary, Tree of Jesse)
Not widespread, visible on original
and filling material
Environmental
conditions/
Previous
restorations/
Inherent faults
Surface Gloss Over the entire arch Widespread, not on fillings, caused
by fixative applied in the 1980’s
Previous
restorations
P A G E | 22
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.2.11 (A-H): Wall paintings on the triumphal
arch, showing some degradation phenomena such
as: deformed surface topography (A, C and F normal
light, B, D and E raking light) and visible extensive
retouching in form of tratteggio (G, H). Photo credit:
Jorien Duivenvoorden, edited by Valentina Gatto.
A B
C
D
E
F
G H
P A G E | 23
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.2.12 (A-F): Wall paintings on the north wall,
showing some degradation phenomena such as:
widespread surface gloss (A), large areas of loss and
retouching (B, C) extensive retouching and
delamination (D, E black area and F). Photo credit:
Jorien Duivenvoorden, edited by Valentina Gatto.
A
B
C F
E
D
P A G E | 24
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
2.5. ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS IN MARIA CHURCH
Because of the strong vulnerability to environmental conditions of both wall paintings and structure
of the church, an initial assessment of the hygrothermal conditions of Maria Church was executed by
the RCE in November 2019 (Crijns, Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020). The air temperature (T, in
C) and relative humidity (RH) were measured before and after the instalment of a portable heather
usually implemented during religious functions in the church. The main purpose was to obtain an
indication of the prevailing indoor climate conditions and its potential changes induced by the heating
system. Moreover, an infrared thermal camera was used to record the thermal distribution over the
surface of the wall paintings. This diagnostic technique is particularly useful to obtain a starting
indication of the potential weak areas of the fabric of the church and to determine the likelihood of
condensation forming over a specific surface (see 4.2.1).3
The initial climate measurement revealed the presence of a fairly constant RH at 70%, despite an
increase in temperature from 8 C to 12 C (Crijns, Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020). The
occurrence of an unchanged RH can be explained by observing the mechanism of heating involved: a
gas burning heather which releases steam, therefore increasing the overall absolute humidity (AH).
Eventually, the AH increased due to the heating system but, since also the T increased, the RH
remained unchanged. Therefore, condensation would have been prevented by the presence of
temperatures higher than the dew points, which were allocated between 2.9 C and 6.7 C (TIS
Climate/Humidity Table, n.d.). According to measurements recorded by the infrared camera, it was
possible to document the following surface temperatures: on the triumphal arch initial temperatures
of 6-7 C were observed with an increase up to 11 C after the heather was started and similarly,
temperatures on the wall painting on the north wall were recorded approximately at 6 C with an
increase up to 8 C after the use of the heather. This initial climate monitoring demonstrated that the
overall internal air and surface temperatures in Maria Church are just above the dew point
temperatures, although the presence of condensation is a documented phenomenon: the relationship
of the outdoor and indoor climate is in need of further monitoring to understand both the yearly
fluctuations of T and RH and the buffering function of the church.
3By recording the temperature of the surface and the relative humidity of the environment the dew point
temperature, temperatures below which water will start to condensate, can be calculated.
P A G E | 25
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3. CAUSES AND DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURAL DETACHMENTS IN WALL PAINTINGS
Generally, the causes of deterioration affecting mural paintings are multiple and their occurrence is
commonly simultaneous and interdependent: the presence of some usually triggers the manifestation
of others (Mora 1974, 11). A classification and a connection between fundamental (main triggering
factors) and secondary causes (those triggered by the fundamental causes) can be established.
Consequently, the successful treatment of any damage greatly relies on the correct classification and
identification of its cause; since wall paintings are integral part of the structure of their building, any
form of decay affecting the latter is also influencing both aesthetic and stability of the other (Mora,
Mora and Philippot 1999, 3). Thus, during the elaboration of any conservation plan this correlation
should be retained, especially during the documentation of causes of decay.
Structural detachments are physical forms of damage induced by either external or internal
mechanical stresses. Their main causes are the following: (I) intrinsic causes related to faults of
structural materials, defective techniques and the geological condition and composition of the ground
of the building; (II) environmental factors, primarily associated with the presence of moisture and
fluctuations of relative humidity; (III) extrinsic causes related to human factors, mainly connected to
the adverse effects of previous conservations and the influence of external vibrations (D’Ossat 1982,
8-24). The secondary causes, decaying reactions spawned by the single or combined action of the main
causes, are: frost damage, migration and re-crystallisation of soluble salts and fungi.
3.1. DESCRIPTION
Structural detachments are complex phenomena, considered among the most frequent types of
damage found in mural paintings. The most commonly observed types of delamination can affect both
structure and pictorial layer of a wall painting: discussions regarding the second type are not included
in this research, despite their occurrence being often generated by the same factors responsible for
the first type.
Structural delamination, detachment, defect or even disintegration are terminologies used to define
damages involving: the loss of cohesion within the same structural layer, the loss of adhesion between
two different layers and the loss of adhesion between different applications of the same layer (Fig. 3.1,
3.2, 3.3) (Adams et al. 2005, 525). A categorisation of the different types of detachments that can affect
both pictorial layers and structure of lime-based wall paintings with a brief description of their causes
is retrieved from the literature (Mora, Mora and Philippot 1999, 254; Calicchia and Cannelli 2005,
116). Table 3.1 summarises these two concepts, providing a linear representation of the different
types of delamination and their possible causes (see 3.2., 3.3., and 3.4., for an elaboration of the three
P A G E | 26
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
types of causes described). Furthermore, for clarity reasons, a brief description of the different
materials historically used for the structural realisation of wall paintings can be found in Appendix V.
Table 3.1. Types of delamination, description and causes in lime-base wall paintings
Type of delamination Description Causes
Within the same
structural layer such
as: within the rinzaffo,
arriccio, intonaco
Material is friable and almost
disintegrated. Delamination
occurs in form or relatively
small blisters/gaps
Intrinsic/ Environmental
Lack of cohesion between binding agent
(lime) and aggregates (sand), different
rates of carbonisation between different
layers leading to the hardening of the
pictorial surface and its consequent
lifting, the exposure and direct contact
of these structural layers with water/
air/pollution is facilitated
Between different
structural layers such
as: between the
intonaco and arriccio
or rinzaffo and the
brick wall
Relatively big pockets/gaps
Extrinsic/ Environmental
Exposure to repeated cycles of relative
humidity, crystallisation of salts, re-
deposition of calcite and vibrations
Between different
applications of the
same layer: between
different application
of intonaco or arriccio
Friability of the aggregate
material and delamination in
form of relatively big
pockets/gaps
Intrinsic/ Extrinsic / Environmental
Lack of adhesion and cohesion between
layers of the same material, exposure to
repeated cycles of relative humidity,
crystallisation of salts, re-deposition of
calcite and vibrations
Between pictorial
layer and intonaco
Both blisters and larger
areas of delamination
Intrinsic/ Extrinsic / Environmental
Lack of cohesion within the paint layer
(between pigments and binder) and
adhesion to intonaco, exposure to
repeated cycles of relative humidity,
crystallisation of salts, re-deposition of
calcite and vibrations
P A G E | 27
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.3.1, 3.2, 3.3: Simplified representation of three main types of structural delamination within the layer
archaeology of wall paintings. Sizes, shapes of delamination and their effect on the surface topography are only
indicative; the aim of this illustrations is to portray locations and highlight differences in space of delamination. Photo
credit: Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 28
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3.2. INTRINSIC CAUSES
Intrinsic causes generate damages strictly connected to the origin and nature of the wall painting. In
particular, faulty materials, defective techniques and the geological composition of the ground of the
building are elements considered to be directly responsible for the formation of structural
delamination (D’Ossat 1982, 11–12).
Mortars and building supports can have inherent defects that might lead to the formation of structural
delamination. However, the pictorial layer can also suffer forms of decay that might facilitate the
development of detachments. For instance, any loss of the pictorial surface enables the exposure of
the intonaco to moisture, air, dust and pollution (see 3.3). Finally, it is important to note that, due the
great variation in their composition, each type of lime mortar can exhibit different hydraulic and
mechanical properties and that their durability depends on the grain size distribution of their
admixtures (Stambolov and van Asperen de Boer 1976, 14).
Fig.3.4: Reiterative diagram of the intrinsic causes connected to the formation of structural detachments. Photo credit:
Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 29
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3.2.1. INSTABILITY OF MATERIALS
A failure of the mechanical properties of both mortar and building support might result in the
manifestation of structural delamination. This process might be instigated by two factor: (I) mortars
with equally sized small grains; (II) the mechanical failure caused by excessive external stresses (load
and thermal expansion) (Torraca 2005, 19–29).
The presence of well-rounded, well-sorted small pores in lime-based mortars can have detrimental
effects on the setting process of lime. This occurs by the reaction of lime (calcium hydroxide) with
carbon dioxide in the air, leading to the formation of calcium carbonate (Stambolov and van Asperen
de Boer 1976, 14) (see Appendix V).
Mortars composed of the admixture of small grains possess large specific surface areas; the amount
of binder needed to create structurally stable mortars is larger than that suggested in the literature
and risks of creating mortar with weaker mechanical properties might occur (see 3.2.2.). Moreover,
an excess of fine grains in mortars might lead to densely carbonised layers at the surface, which could
hinder the passage of carbon dioxide within the material and prevent the success of the setting
reaction throughout the layered structured of the wall painting. This can result in the formation of
weakened areas and, consequently, delamination.
Structural detachments can form due to mechanical behaviours instigated by external stresses
imposed by architectural elements like lintels or beams (Torraca 2005, 19–29). Bricks and lime-
mortars are defined as brittle, rigid and fragile, however, they partially exhibit plastic behaviours in
the form of irreversible deformations. For example, the external load exerted by a lintel can induce
tensile stress that would result in the permanent deformation of the structure of the underlying wall
painting (Fig.3.6.,3.7.). The heterogeneity of lime-based mortars is responsible for this behaviour:
these aggregates are composed of several different crystals and glasses held together by bonds with
variable strength. Consequently, these bonds would inevitably break unevenly causing localised
fractures (i.e. the rupture of bonds between binder and aggregates), leading to the formation of weak
areas prone to be irreversibly deformed. Therefore, tensile stress can eventually generate a lack of
cohesion properties of lime-based mortars that would unavoidably result in the formation of
structural detachments.
Fig.3.5: Carbonation reaction representing the setting of lime-based mortar.
Ca(OH)2 + CO2
Calcium hydroxide + carbon dioxide
CaCO3 + H2O Calcium carbonate + water
P A G E | 30
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Moreover, stress within a building might not be equally distributed between its components, leading
to different areas being differently affected by stress related deformations and detachments.
According to Torraca (2005, 19-29), brittle materials which exhibits areas of permanent deformation
are likely to have developed micro-cracks. As a consequence, the access of moisture is facilitated
triggering further deterioration processes (see 3.3). Thus, due to the heterogeneous nature of lime-
based mortars, it is understood how each composite material might endure different deformations.
This way, structural delamination both within and between layers can be explained: if two structural
layers suffer different deformation, a lack of adhesion between them might occur, whilst the rupture
of bonds between lime and sand can generate a lack of their cohesion leading to both detachment and
disaggregation within the same structural layer. This phenomenon can be further enhanced by the
action of moisture (see 3.3).
3.2.2. DEFECTIVE APPLICATION OF MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUE
Structural detachments might form due to mistakes occurred during the preparation of both building
support and rendering (Mora 1974, 13). The classical literature describes the cleaning and subsequent
application of abundant water on the building support as a crucial step. Dust and other debris might
hinder the adhesion of mortar to the building support whilst a dry support, especially a highly porous
one, might eventually absorb water from the mortar and inhibit the carbonation of lime. This way, the
adhesion of superimposed layers of mortars is also prevented. The presence of un-set mortar (i.e.
calcium hydroxide) within renderings is a somewhat common phenomenon that can be also caused
by the presence of small pores within the aggregates.
Fig.3.6, 3.7: Simplified representation of how the external load from two lintels can lead to the deformation of the
building support and the consequent detachment to the first structural layer (rinzaffo) of the wall painting. Sizes and
shapes of delamination are not realistically representative. Photo credit: Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 31
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Furthermore, the correct composition of mortar is essential for the long-term preservation of the wall
painting (Mora 1974, 13). Both an excess and lack of binder can form structural instabilities: an excess
in lime might result in the formation of cracks and detachment between layers whilst a lack of lime
might cause a reduced cohesion with its aggregates, leading to powdery disintegrations within the
same layer. The choice of inadequate aggregates (such as sand containing salts), the incorrect
proportions of the mix and the excessive thickness of layers can contribute to the failure of the
adhesive properties of mortars and, hence, delamination (D’Ossat 1982, 16).
3.2.3. GEOLOGICAL CONDITION AND COMPOSITION OF THE GROUND
The stability of a building relies on the condition and nature of the ground on which it is erected
(D’Ossat 1982, 15). The presence of geo-topographical elements (such as streams, aquifers or the
vicinity of the sea) can influence the composition of the ground and its ability to withstand the load of
the building. Arguably, the formation of structural detachments can be connected to three causes
related to the ground of a building: (I) the inability of the ground to sustain load transmitted to the
foundations of the building resulting in the partial sinking of these with consequent deformation of
building supports and renderings; (II) the rising of moisture and water from either a nearby source of
water or from a highly hygroscopic ground (see 3.4); (III) the presence of friable or weakened
materials (such as a deteriorated clay-based ground) unsuitable to resist the load of the building with
subsequent collapse of parts of its foundations.
P A G E | 32
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3.3. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
The formation of structural delamination in wall paintings can be caused by three secondary reactions
induced by the synergetic action of environmental factors: (I) frost action; (II) the migration and re-
crystallisation of soluble salts; (III) the chemical deterioration of calcareous materials. Therefore, both
physical and chemical mechanisms can be responsible for the development of structural detachment;
the first process exposes the porous structure of building materials to large internal stresses, whilst
the second one involves the acid corrosion of the calcium carbonate, its dissolution and subsequent
re-deposition, creating weak areas more susceptible to external stresses (Torraca 2009, 83-88).
The main environmental factors directly responsible for the abovementioned phenomena are the
presence of moisture4 and atmospheric pollutants (Mora 1974, 16–22). However, secondary reactions
like fungi and biological accretions, might play a fundamental role both on the formation of structural
delamination and also on the process of re-crystallisation of salts (Garg, Jain, and Mishra 1995, 263).
Therefore, the combined action of several environmental factors can lead to the development of
structural detachments, however none of them would occur without the presence of moisture (Mora
1974, 16-22). The mechanism of passage of moisture thorough porous building materials is rather
complex and a simplified description is found in Appendix VI.
4 For simplicity reasons, this term is used to define the passage of water in its gaseous and liquid phase through
building materials and cycles of relative humidity.
Fig.3.8: Reiterative diagram of the environmental factors connected to the formation of structural detachments. Photo
credit: Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 33
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3.3.1. FROST DAMAGE
The formation of ice crystals within porous building materials is facilitated by low temperatures
(below 0C). The mechanical compression exercised by the growing crystals and the subsequent
resistance of the materials surrounding them can lead to large internal stresses, resulting in both
adhesive and cohesive failures (Torraca 2005, 31).
The development of ice crystals can follow two mechanism: frost heave and water entrapment
(Torraca 2005, 31). Generally, the formation of ice crystals occur easily in large pores, whilst their
growth in capillaries occurs only in presence of strong pressure. Water molecules inside small pores
(capillaries) are strongly attracted to the surrounding hygroscopic building material and, due to their
restrained movement, cannot move into the crystallised structure typical of ice. Oppositely, in large
pores, the water molecules have more freedom to re-arrange themselves and form ice crystals. During
this process, water from the capillaries moves to the growing crystals by means of diffusion: if the
crystal has formed and there is still water available in the capillaries, enough pressure is developed to
allow the growth of ice crystals also in the small pores. Frost heave damage is endured by materials
with a high percentage of small pores: the amount of pressure generated can lead to large internal
stresses, resulting in mechanical failures.
The development of ice crystals by means of water entrapment is slightly different, although,
eventually, similar internal stresses are formed. Liquid water can remain confined between already
frozen areas generating enough stresses to overcome the material tensile strength leading to both
adhesive and cohesive failures (Torraca 2005, 31). Interestingly, the increase in volume of water
molecules upon freezing is not regarded as the major cause of development of internal stresses:
liquids that do not exhibit an increase in volume after freezing resulted in imposing similar stresses
as water (Torraca 2009, 84). Therefore, the primary reasons behind the development of structural
delamination is the pressure exerted by the crystals to the surrounding material.
3.3.2. MIGRATION AND RE-CRYSTALLISATION OF SOLUBLE SALTS
The evaporation of water from porous building materials can cause both structural and pictorial
damages due to the re-crystallisation of its dissolved salts (Torraca 2009, 85). The mechanism of salt
and ice crystals development is similar: the growth of crystals occurs first within large pores, whilst
capillaries diffuse water to the growing crystals, eventually leading to large internal stresses caused
by an increase in pressure. Moreover, internal stresses can be caused by an increase in volume of a
salt crystal due to either thermal expansions or to the re-dissolution and re-crystallisation into a
different hydration state (Doehne and Price 2010, 15). The latter can follow two mechanisms: (I) the
hydrated salt re-crystallises into a less hydrated form (anhydrous), thus releasing water molecules
P A G E | 34
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
and increasing its volume (triggered by an increase in temperatures); (II) the anhydrous salt crystal
draws water from the surrounding capillaries, becoming a more voluminous hydrated form (caused
by an increase in relative humidity) (Torraca 2005, 33). However, the majority of internal stresses are
caused by repeated cycles of evaporation, re-dissolution and re-crystallisation of salts and their
accumulation at the point of evaporation (Doehne and Price 2010, 16).
Generally, the process of migration and re-crystallisation of salts is quite complex and its
destructiveness depends on the location of the evaporation zone (Mora 1974, 18). Two main types of
crystalline formations can be classified: (I) efflorescence, where salts re-crystallise over the surface of
the mural; (II) sub-efflorescence, where salts crystals develop within the structure of the mural. The
latter is considered the most destructive mechanism and also the one associated with the formation
of structural detachment. Both phenomena are determined by the mechanism of moisture
evaporation from building materials, which is directly influenced by the environmental conditions and
the porosity of the materials. During the formation of sub-florescence, the evaporation zone of
Fig.3.9, 3.10: Schematic representation of the increase in volume a salt crystal can undergo, inside a pore: by re-
crystallising into a less hydrated form (dehydration) or by re-crystallising into a more hydrated form (hydration) .
Photo credit: Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 35
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
moisture is located below the surface of the wall painting. Therefore, the water vapour generated has
to travel through the remaining porous material, where further chemical reactions can be triggered
(see 3.3.4) before it can reach the surface and evaporate. Generally, a fast moisture evaporation is
necessary for the formation of sub-florescence, a circumstance which appears to be favoured by the
presence of strong wind, relatively warm temperatures and low relative humidity (Torraca 2009, 86).
However, the location of the evaporating front below the surface of the wall painting can also be
formed by a drop in moisture supply which can be caused by an abrupt increase of high temperature
due to seasonal cycles (Mora 1974, 17). When the source of moisture is scarce, its speed of movement
decreases leading to a premature evaporation. In this instance, both efflorescence and sub-florescence
might occur simultaneously due a shift of the evaporation zone from the surface of the wall painting
to its rendering.
Furthermore, the different composition of soluble salts can have diverse destructive effects on lime-
base mortars, according to their increase in volume after re-crystallisation and their ability to
deliquesce and react with other ions to form other salts of different hygroscopicity (Piqué, Ferroni,
and Dei 1992, 217). Table 3.2 summarises the salts most commonly found in wall paintings, their form
of crystallisation, provenance and associated damage.
It is important to note that, both crystalline formations of salts can lead to the development of
structural detachments: efflorescence can cause pictorial losses which can lead to further weakening
of the mortar structure due to its facilitate exposure to the atmosphere, whilst sub-florescence can
generate internal stresses, due to the volume expansion of salt crystals and an overall increase in
pressure, which can lead to the adhesive and cohesive failure of the mortar (Mora 1974, 21). Finally,
the enhancement of the chemical degradation of lime-based mortar exerted by salt activity is
discussed in the next paragraph.
P A G E | 36
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Table 3.2. Composition of soluble salts and common damages affecting lime-mortar
I. Sulphates
Salt usual
hydration
state
Chemical
Name
Mineral
Name Origin
Form of
crystallisation Damage
Na2SO4 . 10
H2O
Sodium
sulphate
hydrate
Thenardite
Derivate of
construction
materials or their
decomposition,
from bats/bird
excreta
Efflorescence
Sub-florescence
Physical damage,
pictorial losses
and structural
detachments
Na2SO4 Sodium
sulphate Mirabilite
K2MgSO4 .
6H2O
Potassium
magnesium
sulphate
hexahydrate
Picromerite
K2MgSO4 .
4H2O
Potassium
magnesium
sulphate
tetrahydrate
Leonite
K3Na(SO4)2
Potassium
sodium
sulphate
Aphthitalite
K2SO4 Potassium
sulphate Arcanite
MgSO4 .
7H2O
Magnesium
sulphate
heptahydrate
Epsomite
MgSO4 .
6H2O
Magnesium
sulphate
hexahydrate
Hexahydrate
CaSO4. 2
H2O
Calcium
sulphate
hydrate
Gypsum
Derivate of
construction
materials, from
bats/bird excreta,
previous
conservation
treatments,
atmospheric
pollutants
Formed by
chemical
reaction with
CaCO3, can cause
pictorial losses
and structural
detachments
P A G E | 37
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
II. Carbonates
III. Silicates
IV. Chlorides
Salt usual
hydration
state
Chemical
Name
Mineral
Name Origin
Form of
crystallisation Damage
CaCO3 Calcium
carbonate
Calcite/
Aragonite
Derivate of
construction
materials or their
decomposition,
from bats/bird
excreta (surface re-
deposition of
calcite)
Surface
incrustations
Chemical
reaction with
CO2 leading to
the re-deposition
of calcite, which
can cause
pictorial losses
and structural
weakening
Salt usual
hydration
state
Chemical
Name
Mineral
Name Origin
Form of
crystallisation Damage
CaSiO3 Calcium
metasilicate Wollastonite
Derivate of
construction
materials or their
decomposition,
previous
conservation
treatments
Surface
incrustations
Formed by
chemical
reaction with
CaCO3, can cause
structural
weakening and
pictorial losses
Salt usual
hydration
state
Chemical
Name
Mineral
Name Origin
Form of
crystallisation Damage
NaCL Sodium
chloride Halite
From the
atmosphere
(vicinity of the
sea), from
bats/bird excreta
Efflorescence
(more common),
Sub-florescence
No disintegrating
effect, can react
with other ions
to form more
damaging salts
P A G E | 38
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
V. Nitrates
VI. Oxalates
Salt usual
hydration
state
Chemical
Name
Mineral
Name Origin
Form of
crystallisation Damage
NaNO3 Sodium
nitrate Soda nitre
From the soil, from
bats/bird excreta,
atmospheric
pollutants
Efflorescence
Disintegrating
action inferior to
that of the
sulphates,
pictorial losses
which can lead to
structural
detachments
KNO3 Potassium
nitrate
Nitre or
Saltpetre
Ca(NO3)2 .
4H2O
Calcium
nitrate
tetrahydrate
Nitrocalcite
Salt usual
hydration
state
Chemical
Name
Mineral
Name Origin
Form of
crystallisation Damage
CaC2O4 .H2O
Hydrated
calcium
oxalate
Whewellite
From fungal
metabolic activity
Efflorescence
Formed by
chemical
reaction with
CaCO3, can lead
to pictorial
losses and
structural
detachments
CaC2O4
.2H2O
Calcium
oxalate
dihydrate
Weddellite
P A G E | 39
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3.3.3. CHEMICAL DETERIORATION
The cementing properties of mortars can be severely damaged by the chemical reaction of lime with
acids found in water (rain, dew or groundwater) or in the atmosphere (pollutants) (Torraca 2009,
87). Furthermore, soluble salts can enhance the dissolution of calcite, depending on the pH of the
aqueous solution formed (Doehne and Price 2010, 19). It is essential to remind that, since chemical
reactions can only occur in the presence of water, the chemical deterioration of mural paintings is
possible only if the latter is exposed to moisture.
Rainwater and groundwater are usually slightly acidic because of the presence of carbon dioxide
(Mora, Mora and Philippot 1999, 198). The latter originates either from the atmosphere or from the
respiration of living organism in the soil and, when dissolved in water, forms a very weak acid,
carbonic acid. Calcium carbonate can be dissolved by this acid, giving rise to the soluble calcium
bicarbonate. This, decomposes during drying depositing a layer of calcium carbonate at the
evaporation zone. (Fig.3.11). This process, also known as the re-deposition of calcite, often accounts
for the formation of white hard surface crusts affecting both mortar and pictorial layer. Repeated
cycles of this chemical reaction can severely affect the structural stability of wall paintings, leading to
two decay processes: (I) the loss of pictorial material, and the subsequent exposure of the rendering
to atmospheric degradation; (II) the structural delamination between the pictorial layer and the
intonaco.
Two strong acids can be formed by the reaction of pollutants with water: sulphuric acid and nitric
acid, both derived from the reaction of their respective anhydrides and oxides with water (Fig. 3.12,
3.13) (Torraca 2009, 88). These can affect the structure of building materials and wall paintings by
means of acid rains. Therefore, calcium carbonate can be transformed into calcium sulphate and
calcium nitrate by reacting with the respective acids (Fig.3.12/3.13). Consequently, structural
degradation can occur as a result of both cycles of dissolution and re-deposition of the salts at the
evaporation front (both below and above the surface of the wall painting) and also due to expansion
in volume and increase in pressure after re-crystallisation of the calcium carbonate.
CO2 + H2O
carbon dioxide + water
H2CO3 carbonic acid
CaCO3 + H2CO3
calcium carbonate + carbonic acid
Ca(HCO3)2 calcium bicarbonate evaporation
CaCO3 calcium carbonate
Fig.3.11: Re-deposition of calcite, caused by the dissolution of calcium carbonite by carbonic acid formed by carbon
dioxide and water.
P A G E | 40
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
The presence of salts can enhance the dissolution of calcium carbonate depending on the composition
and ionic concentration once in solution (Ruiz-Agudo et al. 2010, 1256). Acidic aqueous solutions are
formed by the action of sulphuric and nitric acids in the atmosphere and can lead, not only to the
dissolution calcium carbonate (Fig. 3.12/3.13) but also to the dissolution of other salts found in the
structure of the wall painting, through a double-replacement reaction. During this chemical process,
the salt rearranges into its associated acid and into a new salt (Fig.3.14). It is understood that the
presence of specific cations and anions such as Mg2+ and SO42- can enhance the solubility of calcite;
therefore any reaction that can lead to the formation of such ions, will increase the dissolution of
calcium carbonate (Fig.3.15) (Dabb, 1971, 5).
2SO3 + 2H2O
sulphur dioxide + oxygen+ water
2H2SO4 sulphuric acid
CaCO3 + H2SO4 + H2O
calcium carbonate + sulphuric acid + water
CaSO4 . 2H2O + CO2
calcium sulphate dihydrate (gypsum)
Fig.3.12: Chemical reaction of calcium carbonate with sulphuric acid and subsequent formation of
calcium sulphate.
4NO2 + O2 + 2H2O
nitrogen dioxide + oxygen +water
4HNO3 nitric acid
CaCO3 + 2HNO3
calcium carbonate + nitric acid
Ca(NO3)2 + H2O + CO2
calcium nitrate
Fig.3.13: Chemical reaction of calcium carbonate with nitric acid and subsequent formation of calcium
nitrate.
2NaNO3 + H2SO4
sodium nitrate + sulphuric acid
2HNO3 + NaSO4
nitric acid + sodium sulphate
Fig.3.13: Example of a double-replacement reaction between a salt commonly found in wall paintings and
sulphuric acid. This reaction produce a new salt and nitric acid, which can further dissolve calcite.
MgSO4 + H2NO3
magnesium sulphate + nitric acid
Mg(NO3)2 + H2SO4
magnesium nitrate + sulphuric acid
Fig.3.14: Example of a double-replacement reaction between a salt commonly found in wall paintings and nitric acid. This reaction produce a new salt and sulphuric acid, which can increase the solubility of calcite.
P A G E | 41
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3.3.4. FUNGI AND BIODETERIORATION
The development of fungal mycelia and fruiting bodies within the structure of lime-based wall
paintings can be favoured by three main factors: (I) high relative humidity, above 65 % to initiate
growth and between 75% and 95% to germinate into a mycelium; (II) temperatures, generally
between 20 C and 35 C, to support the presence of moisture in the air; (III) organic nutrients, found
in the accumulation of dust on the surface(Garg, Jain, and Mishra 1995, 257). The formation of
structural delamination can be connected to the presence of fungi due to their physical and chemical
decays.
The growth of fungal mycelia and fruiting bodies can occur both within and over the surface of mural
paintings (Garg, Jain, and Mishra 1995, 257). When growing within the structure, layers dislodgments
can occur due to the physical growth of the fungi and by expansion and contraction of their thallus
caused by fluctuations of relative humidity (Doehne and Price 2010, 22). Consequently, structural
weakening and increased susceptibilities to external stresses are caused, leading to the development
of structural detachments. Oppositely, the formation of fungi over the surface generates long
filaments, responsible for the chemical decay of the pictorial layer.
The assimilation and dissimilation of nutrients of fungi can generate the chemical degradation of the
structural materials of wall paintings by producing enzymes and acids (Garg, Jain, and Mishra 1995,
263). During the assimilation of carbon based nutrients, fungi can produce a variety of enzymes that
can transform complex proteins into water soluble substances. Therefore, organic paint binders,
mortar aggregates (such as animal hair and plant fibres) and restoration materials of organic origin
might suffer disintegration resulting in their pulverisation and the subsequent weakening of the
structure of the wall painting . The excretion of waste products and metabolic activity of the fungi can
release organic acids like gluconic, citric and oxalic acids. The chemical reaction of such acids with
calcium carbonate can severely impair mortar; not only this can suffer decalcification by the action of
citric acid (this would act as a chelator of calcium ions) but the formation of salts, like calcium oxalate,
is strongly favoured (see 3.3.3).
The role of autotrophic and heterotrophic bacteria can be linked to chemical reactions that can cause
the formation of structural detachments (Doehne and Price 2010, 23). Autotrophic bacteria,
microorganisms that derive their carbon based nutriment from carbon dioxide in the air, have the
ability of oxidising sulphur and nitrogen oxides and produce sulphuric and nitric acids. The damaging
effect of such acids on lime-based mortars is described in paragraph 3.3.4. Oppositely, heterotrophic
bacteria assume their nutriments from organic materials composing the wall paintings, resulting in
the possible degradation of organic binders and mortar aggregates of organic origin.
P A G E | 42
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3.4. EXTRINSIC CAUSES
Extrinsic causes consist of all forces connected to natural and human activities (D’Ossat 1982, 13).
Whilst the main natural phenomena associated with structural delamination occurring in wall
paintings were covered in paragraph 3.3, this section primarily describes the influence of vibrations
and previous restorations on the development of structural damages. The term ‘previous restorations’
is here included as an umbrella term to categorise all deliberate modifications to the original structure
and function of both buildings and wall paintings as well as variations in the surrounding environment
and soil. In other words, it gathers all consequences of previous interventions that could have altered
the structural stability of the wall painting.
Fig.3.15: Reiterative diagram of the extrinsic causes connected to the formation of structural detachments. Photo credit:
Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 43
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3.4.1. ADVERSE EFFECTS OF PREVIOUS CONSERVATION TREATMENTS
Physical alterations of a building can disturb the load balance between its architectural elements
(D’Ossat 1982, 23). The presence of excessive loads can generate permanent deformations, resulting
in the adhesive failure of composite materials in wall paintings and, hence, structural detachments.
Similar damages can be obtained due to modification of the ground, leading to distresses of the
delicate balance with the foundations of the building (see 3.2).
More specifically, structural problems could be caused by the use of incompatible materials involved
in previous conservation treatments (Torraca 2009, 69). This concept refers to the action of materials
considered to damage the original artefact whilst contributing to its conservation. Therefore,
materials deemed to influence the development of structural detachments can be classified according
to their physical or chemical incompatibility with the original ones.
Physical incompatibilities between materials entail the mechanical alteration of the original ones by
the action of the conservation materials whilst chemical incompatibilities are associated with induced
chemical reactions which would not otherwise occur (Torraca 2009, 69). Three main alterations are
related to the physical and chemical action of incompatible conservation materials and are hereby
discussed.
1. The formation of salts can be facilitated by the introduction of salt containing materials like
cement or gypsum or by the use of acids or alkaline solutions as cleaning agents (Torraca 2005,
118). These materials, once introduced within the structure of the wall paintings, will react with
moisture: salts present in cements and gypsum based materials will be solubilised whilst acids
and alkaline materials will react with both water and calcium carbonate, forming soluble salts.
The fundamental role of salts into the formation of structural detachments is discussed in 3.3.3.
2. The deflection or interruption of moisture passage can lead to severe structural and pictorial
damages (Torraca 2005, 119). This is correlated to the previous use of hydrophobic materials
(such as epoxy or acrylic based synthetic mortars and most types of varnishes) and materials
exhibiting different permeability properties due to different pore size and pore size distribution
(cement or dense filling materials with low porosity). The use of hydrophobic materials can cause
the accumulation of moisture behind the surface and the consequent development of internal
stresses due to the re-crystallisation of salts. Generally, the diversion of moisture flow can lead to
a change of the evaporation zone resulting in localised internal stresses to areas nearby the
incompatible materials (Torraca 2009, 69–86).
P A G E | 44
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
3. Mechanical failure of composite materials is among the main causes of structural delamination.
This can be triggered by differences in thermal expansion and elasticity between original and
conservation materials. Cement or synthetic materials (epoxy or acrylics) possess larger thermal
expansion coefficients than lime-based mortars. These would inevitably endure mechanical
damage, eventually resulting in deformations (Torraca 2009, 69,86; Torraca 2005, 119).
Due to the intertwined relationship of the physical and chemical incompatibilities between original
and conservation materials, a summary of these and the alterations they may cause is provided in
Table 3.3.
Table. 3.3. Alterations caused by incompatible conservation materials
Alteration Type of
incompatibility Conservation material
Causes of structural
detachment
Formation of
soluble salts
Chemical – due to salt
contamination or
presence of salt in the
conservation material
or by chemical reaction
Cement used for grouting or
filling , inorganic
consolidants containing
sands or contaminated by
salts or gypsum based, acids
(acetic acid) or alkali
(caustic soda) as cleaning
agents
Dissolution of calcite,
and physical damage
due to internal
stresses
Diversion or
interruption of
moisture passage
through the wall
painting
Chemical/ Physical –
due to the different
morphological
properties of the
conservation material
Cement, synthetic mortars
(epoxy/ acrylic based),
material with different pore
size and pore size
distribution or material with
different permeability used
for grouting , filling or
varnishing
Deflection of moisture
flow and change of
evaporation zone,
consequent
accumulation of
moisture and salts in
localised areas and
damage of the original
material
Mechanical failure
Physical – due to
different thermal
expansion and low
elasticity of the
conservation material
Cement, synthetic mortars
(epoxy/acrylic based) and
non-porous stiff material
used for grouting or filling
Different reaction to
thermal, external or
internal stresses, the
weaker original
material is damaged
3.4.2. THE INFLUENCE OF VIBRATIONS
External or nearby vibrations, caused by traffic, machinery or sound, can induce mechanical stresses
to building materials (Torraca, 2005, 53). Whilst their individual effect is considered insufficient to
P A G E | 45
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
generate damage to buildings, vibration induced stress, if superimposed on other types of stresses
acting on buildings (such as mechanical and thermal stresses), can generate an increase in their
deterioration rate. A common source of vibration is originated by traffic and the impact of vehicles
over irregularities of the road. The intensity of the stress generated is directly proportional to the
weight and speed of the vehicle, the height of the irregularities of the road and its distance to the
building (Torraca 2009, 77). Generally, the damage that a building might endure due to any source of
vibration depends on the phenomenon of resonance: this indicates the event in which the exciting
frequency (the one generated by the vibration) is close to the natural frequency (the one of the
building) causing an amplification of the oscillation of the building and an overall increase in
mechanical stress. Consequently, it is argued that structural elements, such as plaster and mortar, are
extremely susceptible to vibration damage, especially if their state of repair is already compromised
(Torraca, 2005, 62).
3.5. CONCLUSION
Causes of structural delamination in lime-based wall paintings are complex and their occurrence is
generally concurrent and interdependent. As a result, their precise identification can be a rather
intricate task. The importance of establishing a connection between degradation phenomena affecting
wall paintings and their causes is expressed in the literature (Calicchia and Cannelli 2005, 116; Mora
1974, 11; Mora, Mora and Philippot 1999, 173). Consequently, conservation treatments implemented
in-situ without subsequent environmental control and amelioration of causes are deemed insufficient
to achieve long-term effects (Brajer and Larsen 2008, 219). Whilst this concept appears to be
powerfully articulated in conservation literature, descriptions of causes of structural delamination are
scarcely found with only a few articles and books generally describing this issue (Calicchia and
Cannelli 2005; Mora 1974; Torraca 2009; Torraca, 2005). It is remarkable to observe that several
areas of research appeared to be centred around the different identification methods and remedial
treatments of structural delamination, rather than around their causes (Biçer-Şimşir and Rainer 2011;
Hinsch et al. 2009; Dandolo and Jepsen 2016; Kordatos et al. 2013).
Therefore, this chapter aimed at elaborating the general statements stipulated in the literature to
provide a more meaningful and complete understanding of the correlation between intrinsic, extrinsic
and environmental factors and the development of structural detachments. Additional fields of
research should involve laboratory testing to corroborate the chemical dissolution of calcite and
subsequent formation of delamination, induced by acidic conditions and the migration and re-
crystallisation of salts.
P A G E | 46
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
4. METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF STRUCTURAL DETACHMENTS 4000
Assessing the preservation state of wall paintings is one the most challenging and important technical
problems faced by conservators (Tornari et al. 2013, 3). Proficient approaches not only require the
identification of damages but should also provide reliable results about their progress. Only through
the understanding of materials characteristics, the technology of execution of the murals and by the
accurate recording of their damages, rate of degradation and associated causes, an effective treatment
plan can be established (Pereira et al. 2011, 2145). Therefore, achieving a precise knowledge of the
overall subsurface condition of wall paintings is necessary for conservation purposes. The following
chapter provides a description of the current methods of identification of structural detachments,
outlining the associated advantages and disadvantages. It is crucial to note that any investigative
method should be ‘non-destructive’, i.e. it must not cause any irreversible alteration to the artefact.
Lastly, further studies should focus on widening the scope of results obtainable by including
qualitative information about delamination and understanding of the possible correlation between
structural and surface damages affecting the wall painting.
4.1. VISUAL APPROACH AND PERCUSSION METHOD
The initial examination of the structure of a wall painting is often executed by means of visual
observations, followed by the involvement of the so called percussion method (Fig.4.1). According to
Mora (Mora and Philippot 1999, 23), the initial inspection of the adherence between the pictorial layer
and the intonachino is easily achievable with a raking light examination; this way the overall surface
topography of the mural can be observed, and deformed raised areas should be considered indicative
of the presence of detachments. The adhesion and cohesion between mortar layers and between these
and the building support can be verified with the abovementioned percussion method. This, otherwise
known as the ‘tap and listen’ or acoustic approach, represents the most common technique involved
in conservation practice (Hinsch et al. 2009, 96). Generally, it implies the gentle tapping of the painted
surface with a nail, a finger, knuckle or a suitable light weight instrument (Hinsch et al. 2009, 96; Mora,
Mora and Philippot 1999, 23).5 However, different ways of executing this approach are described in
the literature, some mentioning the traversing of the surface with a pencil or a stick rather than its
tapping. The acoustic response generated needs to be interpreted: usually a hollow sound is attributed
5 A demonstration of how to carry out a percussion test for the identification of structural detachments is shown
by Mora in a video describing the conservation of the Tomb of Queen Nefertari. See ‘Conservation process of the
wall paintings in the Tomb of Queen Nefertari’, minute 16:00: https://www.nefertaritomb.com/process
P A G E | 47
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
to the presence of detachments, however, differences in intensity can be specific of a large (low-
pitched) or relatively small delamination (high-pitched).
Whilst this method appears to be an extremely common approach for the identification of
detachments in wall paintings, only a few publications describe it in a meaningful way (Hinsch et al.
2009, 96; Guelker, Hinsch, and Joost 2001, 188; Fricke-Begemann, Gu, and Joost 2000, 538; Mora and
Philippot 1968, 170), with many others simply mentioning it (Lasyk et al. 2012, 3; Tornari et al. 2013,
4; Collini 2011, 868; Mancinelli 1991, 57; Adams 2006, 35) and potentially, believing to refer to a
standardized method. Eventually, the quality of the results and interpretations directly corresponds
to the experience of the conservator. Hinsch provides a detailed description of the different features
observed during a test performed on a wall painting (Hinsch et al. 2009, 96). These should be regarded
as an indicative suggestion of the variety of sounds originated by this type of test. Additionally, its
suitability relies on the condition of the pictorial layer, since mechanical pressure is inevitably exerted,
involving some degree of unintentional damage.
4.1.1. DISCUSSION
To this day, the use of the percussion method, despite being referred to as cumbersome, empirical and
subjective, appears to be widespread during diagnostical investigations in conservation projects
(Tornari et al. 2013, 4). The lasting presence of this method might be associated with the will to retain
traditional approaches and also, due to its ease of execution. Furthermore, it represents a customized
way of approaching this type of damage: the presence of structural detachments is almost always
associated with an intrinsic and unquestionable need for their treatment, putting in second place the
need for a correct diagnosis and quantification of these. Whilst results obtained by this technique do
not inform about the rate of deterioration or the extension of the detachments, its use, combined with
thorough observations of the surface, can provide a holistic picture of the general condition of the
mural in question (see Table 4.1) (Hinsch et al. 2009, 94).
P A G E | 48
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Table 4.1. Advantage and disadvantages of percussion method
Advantages Disadvantages
Cost – executing the technique is free Cost – reaching the pictorial surface might
involve costly scaffolding
Ease of execution Need for expert interpretation to somewhat
good but still subjective results
Results provide an overall indication of the
state of preservation of the painting
Mechanical pressure exerted on the surface
can lead to damages
No information about the rate of
deterioration or dimensions of the
detachments
Poor repeatability and time consuming
Fig.4.1: Drawing illustrating the execution of the percussion method. Photo
credit: Mora and Philippot, 'The Conservation of Wall Paintings' in The
Conservation of Cultural Property, with Special Reference to Tropical
Conditions, 171.
P A G E | 49
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
4.2. INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY (IRT)
The presence of subsurface damages can be identified and mapped through the use of thermal
imaging; the temperature variation of structural materials is monitored allowing the assessment of
damage distribution (Kordatos et al. 2013, 1261). The technique is characterised as a non-destructive,
non-contact method and can be achieved by two different approaches: active and passive
thermography.
4.2.1. PASSIVE THERMOGRAPHY
The temperature distribution within structural materials in wall paintings or, more generally, in
historical buildings, can be monitored by means of passive thermography (Hinsch et al. 2009, 97). A
camera capable of detecting thermal radiations is used to generate visual images of the temperature
distribution within an object. Thermal imaging is considered a useful tool for the evaluation of
buildings performance, where heat input, heat loss, solar gain and air infiltration can be monitored.
However, its use for the identification of structural detachments is somewhat difficult to obtain. Due
to the low conductivity of building materials and lime-based mortars, a lack of consistent temperature
variations, within a homogeneous temperature environment, between detached and integral layers is
observed (Drácky and Lesák 2006, 594).
4.2.2. ACTIVE THERMOGRAPHY
More accurate results can be acquired with the use of active thermography (Mercuri et al. 2015, 1189).
This technique is based on the excitation of the surface of the wall painting with infrared radiation
emitted by a light source. Four subcategories are described: pulsed phased, transient, vibro-
thermography and lock-in thermography. Generally, active thermography delivers structural
information of an object by documenting the emitted infrared reflection which is detected by an IR
camera; this provides two-dimensional mapping of the reflected radiation (thermograms), showing
the temperature distribution within the mural. Material discontinuities, like cracks, voids and
detachments, can either decrease or accelerate the propagation of the thermal waves generating
visual contrasts in thermograms (Ibarra-Castanedo et al. 2009, 2).
Differences between subcategories involve variations in the methods of surface irradiation and the
elaboration of results. For instance, during the ‘Lock-in Thermography’ (LT) the surface of the mural
is periodically subjected to the thermal excitation of a halogen lamp, which produces a signal at a fixed
frequency, i.e. a sinusoidal wave (Ibarra-Castanedo et al. 2009, 10). The IR camera monitors the
emitted signal and the hardware, which is ‘locked’ on the known excitation frequency, elaborates it by
measuring the phase variation which is then transformed into a visual representation. Differently, in
P A G E | 50
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
‘Pulsed Phased Thermography’ (PPL), structural damages are identified by the monitoring of the
thermal response of the object, once submitted to a heat pulse of a high power source, such as Xenon
flash. Therefore, both the response to increase and decrease in heat can be monitored, allowing the
visual representation of damages according to the principle that these can conduct thermal waves
differently. Similarly, ‘Transient’ or ‘Gradual Thermography’ involves analogous elaboration of results
as PPL by using similar light sources as LT for a longer duration of time (Kordatos et al. 2013, 1262).
Therefore, the wall painting is heated through a halogen lamp until a predetermined increase in
temperature is reached (between 3C to 10 C) and its subsequence decrease is recorded. This
subcategory is regarded as the cheapest and easiest to operate among the other active thermography
techniques. Finally, the ‘Vibro-thermography’, a technique also known as ultrasound thermography,
exploits the use of sonic or ultrasonic waves to detect internal defects (Ibarra-Castanedo et al. 2009,
13). This mechanical signal will produce a complex combination of absorption, scattering and
dispersion of the waves once in contact with material inhomogeneities, and their main consequent
reaction will be the manifestation of heat. According to Kordatos et al. (2013, 1264), most effective
results can be obtained by the combined used of different subcategories (see 4.3).
4.2.3. DISCUSSION
The applicability of active thermography for the identification of structural detachments can be a
rather complex procedure, however, excellent results have been obtained in conservation practice
when different subcategories are integrated (Kordatos et al. 2013, 1264) or coupled with other non-
destructive techniques, such as DSPI (Sfarra et al. 2014, 3480) or ultrasonic (Amanatiadis et al. 2019,
472). The main drawbacks entail: high costs associated with the equipment, the extensive amount of
time required for both test executions and interpretations of data; the need for experienced
professionals to elaborate results, which can be severely disturbed by the moisture content within
building materials (Drácky and Lesák. 2006, 596); ununiform heating of the structural materials;
reflectivity of the surface (due to a highly glossy surface) and surface topography (highlighted
undulations or surface damages) (Ibarra-Castanedo et al. 2009, 29). Finally, active thermography is
primarily involved to investigate the structural properties of materials to a depths up to 10 cm
(Dandolo and Jepsen 2016, 199). Table 4.2 offers a summary of associated advantages and
disadvantage.
P A G E | 51
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Table 4.2. Advantage and disadvantages of active thermography
4.3. ACOUSTIC METHODS
Non-destructive sonic and ultrasonic techniques have been implemented for the past thirty years to
monitor the state of conservation of building materials (McCann and Forde 2001, 73). Both techniques
exploit the transmission and interpretation of elastic waves at sonic and ultrasonic frequencies, to
document the mechanical behaviour and the structure of materials. Unlike electromagnetic waves
(see 4.4), mechanical elastic waves do not propagate in a vacuum and travel faster in solids and liquid
than through the air; for this reason, acoustic methods require a coupling medium (such as a water-
based gel or a sheet of aluminium) between the transducer (piezoelectric sensor) and the surface of
the artefact (Ibarra-Castanedo et al. 2009, 12). Therefore, these techniques, despite being non-
destructive, require the direct contact with the surface of the artefact.
Advantages Disadvantages
Results give valuable information about the
building performance Costly and time consuming technique
Non-contact technique, no risks of damages
caused by pressure
Raw data are difficult to interpret and
elaborate
Best results are obtained by integration
with other subcategories/techniques
Results might be disturbed by moisture
content of materials, irregular heating of the
surface, high surface gloss and irregularities
of its topography
Allows the inspection of large surface areas Need for expert or professional figure to
interpret data
Quantitative results Risks associated with potential overheating
of the surface
Technique allows reproducible results
(objectiveness)
High depth of measurements of up to 10
cm depths
P A G E | 52
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Typical frequencies for sonic techniques are between 20 Hz and 20kHz whilst the range for ultrasonic
waves is between 20kHz and 1MHz (Ibarra-Castanedo et al. 2009, 12). Higher frequencies have
shorter wavelengths, which lead to greater attenuation from the material analysed.6 Therefore, high
frequencies can detect small defects and generate high resolution images, but will only provide
topographical information of shallow depths (Stockwell Berriman 2004, 32). Oppositely, low
frequencies, with long wavelengths, will result in less attenuation, further penetration but a reduced
sharpness of defects. For this reason, sound techniques became less desirable and relatively low
ultrasonic frequencies, above 20 kHz and up to 200 kHz, prevailed in practical applications.
Variations in ultrasonic techniques can be classified according to the different arrangements of
sensors or based on the different modes of propagation of the ultrasonic waves (Karaiskos et al. 2015,
4). The different positions of the piezoelectric transducer and receiver are influenced by the
accessibility of the object tested and can be: (I) direct, where these are on opposite faces of the object
(Fig 4.3); (II) semi-direct, where the emitter and receiver are located at a given angle (Fig.4.4); (III)
indirect, where these are on the same surface (Fig.4.5)(Menéndez 2016, 187). Based on the way
particles oscillate, ultrasonic waves can propagate through a material in three modes: (I) longitudinal
waves (or compressional), which vibrate in parallel direction to that of the wave; (II) shear waves (or
transverse), which oscillate perpendicularly to the direction of wave propagation; (III) surface waves
(or Rayleigh), which propagate along the surface vibrating in an elliptical motion (Karaiskos et al.
2015, 4). The ultrasonic signal analysis can occur in three methods: (I) ultrasonic pulse velocity; (II)
ultrasonic pulse echo; (III) ultrasonic tomography.
6 This factor can be heavily enhanced by the presence of heterogeneous materials like lime-base mortars.
Fig.4.3, 4.4, 4.5: Representation of the different arrangements of piezoelectric transducers and receivers in a wall
painting: direct, semi-direct and indirect. Restrict accessibility might influence the choice of one arrangement over
another. Photo credit: Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 53
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
4.3.1. ULTRASONIC PULSE VELOCITY
This method, one of the most common non-destructive technique in civil engineering used for the
detection of material defects, exploits longitudinal waves and consists in the monitoring of the travel
time of such waves between the source point and the receiver (these can be positioned according to
Fig.4.3,4.4 and 4.5) (Menéndez 2016, 187). By measuring different points in the material, the wave
velocity can be determined and compared: material inhomogeneities, such as cracks, small cavities
and detachments, are characterised by low ultrasonic velocity, oppositely to their surrounding
integral areas (Fais et al. 2017, 72). Acoustic velocity is considered one of the easiest and most reliable
techniques for in situ characterisation of building materials.
4.3.2. ULTRASONIC PULSE ECHO
The identification of structural flaws in building materials can be achieved by the use of ultrasonic
pulse-echo. This method might be preferred due to the restricted accessibility of the wall painting, as
it consists of a single piezoelectric element that acts both as a transducer and a receiver (Karaiskos et
al. 2015, 7). Ultrasonic stress waves emitted are reflected and backscattered once in contact with
material defects, which can be detected and documented. The efficacy of this form of testing is
somewhat reduced, due to the presence heterogeneous materials in wall paintings with high
attenuation characteristics, which will result in the need for low frequency signals (around 20 kHz)
(McCann and Forde 2001, 76). The main drawback of this technique is the formation of scattering, due
to the material heterogeneity, which can lead to confusing results.
4.3.3. ULTRASONIC TOMOGRAPHY
This type of application, despite being widely used for the examination of metals and mainly involving
high frequencies (around 1MHz), have been successfully adopted for the analysis of building materials
using low frequency transducers (20kHz to 70kHz) (Menningen et al. 2018; Maev, Green, and Siddiolo
2006, 200; Menéndez 2016, 190). Ultrasonic tomography, like X-ray tomography, can provide images
of any desired layer through a solid object, by performing a large number of measurements of different
wave paths covering the volume in need of investigation (Menéndez 2016, 189). The technique
generates either 2D or 3D images portraying damaged regions like detachments, by documenting
areas of lower ultrasonic velocity. Due to the need for multiple measurements, this technique is
regarded as expensive and time consuming.
P A G E | 54
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
4.3.4. DISCUSSION
Acoustic techniques are commonly used to document the elastic characteristics and dynamic
properties of building materials; the interpretation of data is rather complex with several factors
considered highly disadvantageous for the successful propagation of sonic and ultrasonic waves
(McCann and Forde 2001, 73). The presence of moisture, the material heterogeneity, the density,
porosity and anisotropy of composite materials can generate backscattering of the waves that can lead
to confusing results (Fais et al. 2017, 72). Moreover, one of the main drawbacks of this type of
techniques is their need to maintain contact with the surface of the mural involving a coupling
medium, usually a water-based gel. Therefore, the state of preservation of the pictorial layer of the
mural and its topography have a great influence on the suitability of acoustic techniques: flaking paint
can be further damaged by the mechanical pressure applied by the sensor, whilst the presence of
undulations can hinder the correct contact of the transducer with the surface, leading to gaps in the
measurements.
Images of high resolution are the main advantage of involving acoustic techniques for the
identification of structural delamination, despite an approximate range of 2 to 10 cm depth of
measurements can be achieved (Dandolo and Jepsen 2016, 199). Some hindrances, like the high signal
attenuation spawned by material heterogeneity, can be overcome by the use of shear waves, instead
of longitudinal: these can produce images with higher resolution since they have lower propagation
velocity than longitudinal waves and, thus, smaller wavelengths that can generate less attenuation
from heterogeneous materials like lime-based mortars. Furthermore, the development of non-contact
ultrasound techniques is still a prominent area of research and resulted in the advancement of
techniques such as pulse laser generators and electromagnetic techniques (see 4.4). Table 4.3
illustrates a summary of the main advantages and disadvantages.
P A G E | 55
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Table 4.3. Advantage and disadvantages of acoustic techniques
4.4. ELECTROMAGNETIC IMAGING TECHNIQUES
Several non-destructive techniques exploit the properties of electromagnetic waves to document both
the surface and structure of building materials. Oppositely to acoustic waves, electromagnetic waves,
which are the result of interactions between an electric and a magnetic field, can propagate in a
vacuum and, hence, do not require a medium to travel (Ibarra-Castanedo et al. 2009, 12). This
component is considered a significant advantage especially in wall painting conservation practice,
where in situ logistics and restricted accessibility might prevent a close contact with the surface of the
artefact. Similar to acoustic methods, electromagnetic imaging techniques consist in the propagation
of electromagnetic waves within a material, and the subsequent monitoring of the reflected signals
received. Two electromagnetic imaging techniques, working at different frequencies, are involved for
the monitoring and mapping of the structural integrity of building materials: Ground penetrating
radar (GPR) and TheraHertz imaging (THz).
Advantages Disadvantages
High resolution images of structural
defects and inhomogeneities
Cost –reaching the pictorial surface might
involve costly scaffolding
Semi-quantitative or quantitative results
Contact technique – the transducer needs to
be in contact with the surface of the painting
together with a coupling medium to
propagate both sonic and ultrasonic waves
Best results are obtained by integration
with other techniques
Surface irregularities can hinder the correct
contact between the transducer and the
surface, generating gaps in the
measurements
Allows the inspection of large surface areas
Flaky and vulnerable pictorial layers are
prone to damages induced by the pressure
applied by the sensor
Technique allows reproducible results
(objectiveness)
Results might be hindered by the presence
of moisture, the material heterogeneity, the
density, porosity and anisotropy of
composite materials
Signal attenuation – the use of shear waves
could overcome this
P A G E | 56
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
4.4.1. GROUND PENETRATING RADAR
GPR is a special radar (RAdion Detection And Ranging), which exploits the propagation of microwaves
(signals with a frequency between 300MHz and 300GHz) to investigate composite building materials
reaching a depth of a few centimetres up to some meters (according to the wavelength
involved)(Catapano et al. 2020, 677). GPR is regarded as a suitable technology to characterise the
inner structure of wall paintings and identify anomalies such as cracks, voids and iron elements. Two
antenna pairs are used to send microwave pulses within the material investigated and record the
returning echoes. As the two antennas move over the surface of the artefact, a radargram is generated.
This is a bi-dimensional graph depicting the positions of the antenna as x-coordinate and the two-
ways travel times as y-coordinate (these indicate the time employed by the signal to travel along the
sensor, go through the material, be reflected and eventually be registered by the receiver)(Nuzzo et
al. 2008, 3). Eventually, 2D and 3D images can be developed.
4.4.2. THERAHERTZ IMAGING
THz techniques have been employed since 2010 to document subsurface features of wall paintings
(Dandolo and Jepsen 2016, 199). The device exploits radiations belonging to the spectral range from
about 1011 to 1013 Hz to possibly characterise the structural delamination of wall paintings, proved
that these are occurring within 1cm from the surface, i.e., the maximum depth of measurement.
Despite this limitation and the strong influence of the thickness of the overall layered structure of the
wall painting investigated, it is essential to remind that such technique allows the characterisation of
internal features and defects with a sub-millimetric spatial resolution (Catapano et al. 2020, 675).
The signal analysis is based on the same mechanism as GPR: the propagation of terahertz waves within
the material through a transducer and the consequent interpretation based on the reflected signal.
Both 2D and 3D representations of results can be obtained, with accurate characterisation of inner
features, position and thickness of inner layers (Catapano et al. 2020, 676).
4.4.3. DISCUSSION
Electromagnetic imaging techniques are based on the propagation of waves of different frequencies
(300MHz to 300 GHz for GPR and around 1 THz for THz Imaging). These technique are affected by the
same main drawbacks associated with the acoustic methods, due to the similar mechanisms of
obtaining results through the exploitation of waves. In depth penetration up to a few metres can be
achieved with GPR, whilst high resolution images of subsurface defects can be obtained with THz
Imaging; both techniques can generate 2D and 3D representations of data.
P A G E | 57
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Specifically, the successful performance of GPR is influenced by the electromagnetic features of the
material tested (Catapano et al. 2020, 677). The propagation of the microwave signals depend on the
dielectric permittivity and electrical conductivity of the material: the first, , describe the capability of
materials to polarise themselves under the influence of an electromagnetic field, whilst the second, ,
quantifies the material capability to allow the flow of an electric current. Since these parameters
depend on the atomic, molecular and granular behaviours of composite materials, it is understood
how the presence of heterogeneous materials like lime-based mortar can hinder the flow of
microwave signals.
Furthermore, backscattering and signal attenuation are limitations usually associated with both
techniques. Generally, the interpretation of radargrams is a complex task, which heavily depends on
the experience of the user.
Table 4.4. Advantage and disadvantages of electromagnetic imaging techniques
Advantages Disadvantages
High resolution images of structural
defects (THz Imaging) Low depth of measurements – THz Imaging
High depth of measurements – GPR Less resolution and sharpness of images
obtained – GPR
Best results are obtained by integration
with other techniques
Results might be hindered by the presence
of crystallised salts, the material
heterogeneity, the density, porosity and
anisotropy of composite materials
Allows the inspection of large surface areas Signal attenuation and backscattering
Non-contact technique, no risks of damages
caused by pressure
The thickness of the structure can hinder
the efficacy of the technique – THz Imaging
Need for expert or professional figure to
interpret data
Moderately high costs – higher than acoustic
techniques
P A G E | 58
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
4.5. DIGITAL SPECKLE PATTERN INTERFEROMETRY (DSPI)
The use of Digital Speckle Pattern Interferometry (also knowns and Electronic Speckle Pattern
Interferometry, Laser Speckle Interferometry or TV Holography) is well documented in the literature
as a non-destructive technique for monitoring deformations and delamination in historic buildings
and monuments (Paoletti and Spagnolo 1993; Boone et al. 1997; Boaglio et al. 2012; Lasyk et al. 2012;
Gülker et al. 1996; Guelker, Hinsch, and Joost 2001; Fricke-Begemann, Gu, and Joost 2000; Hinsch et
al. 2009; Graves et al. 2017). In particular, the size of material discontinuities can be accurately
identified before the occurrence of any macroscopic damage (Zanetta and Facchini 1997, 222).
This technique, which is used for the first time by Casazza (and Giovannoni 1991, 15) to monitor loose
structural areas in the wall paintings in the Brancacci Chapel in Florence, is composed of four basic
parts: a laser light source (usually a continuous wave Nd:YAG laser in the green spectral range or a
HeNe laser, both with a variety of wavelengths)7, a video camera, a hardware (to process the resulting
images), and a loud speaker to introduce mechanical energy within the structure of the wall painting
and induce the oscillation of the detachments. The laser beam is passed through a microscope
objective, before being divided by a beam splitter. One beam irradiates the artefact, whilst the second
is used as a refence one: the first beam, once in contact with the rough surface of the wall painting, is
reflected in all sorts of directions and its superimposition with the reference beam creates the speckle
pattern image (Hinsch et al. 2009, 98; Guelker, Hinsch, and Joost 2001, 188). The latter is created by
an evaluation of phase change between the reflected beam and the reference one, once the surface of
the wall painting is deformed by the acoustic excitation of the speaker (usually in the frequency range
between 100 and 1000 Hz). Therefore, the phase change of the optical waves is recorded by the
camera and final images are processed by the hardware.8
4.5.1. DISCUSSION
DSPI has been used in the field of conservation to map structural detachments in a variety of artworks
(Boone et al. 1997). The high sensitivity of this technique allows the registration of vibration patterns
generated by extremely low sources of sound like voices and the air movement. Generally, results can
be altered by unfavourable ambient conditions such as: mechanical instability of the floor, adjacent
traffic, external acoustic and optical interferences (i.e. echoing of external noises and natural light
7 Generally the longest the wavelength, the lowest the frequency and the lowest the energy irradiated on the
surface of the wall painting.
8 The Getty Conservation Institute posted a short video explaining the basic mechanism of DSPI. This briefly
describes its uses, limitations and further improvements. See ‘Laser Speckle Interferometry for Conservation
Science’, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDzMB27XVxQ.
P A G E | 59
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
irradiating the mural from a window)(Hinsch et al. 2009, 103). Furthermore, data processing and
interpretation of results require specialised professionals or trained conservators.
The use of DSPI allows to accurately identify structural detachments in wall paintings without
requiring contact and, hence, expensive scaffoldings or risks associated with the pressure exerted on
the pictorial layer are avoided. However, as pointed out by Hinsch et al. (2009, 103), the scope of the
results obtained is limited; delamination is precisely mapped, although no categorisation among
different types and degree of delamination is possible. This is considered a potential area of research
in the diagnosis of structural detachments affecting wall paintings (see 4.6). Finally, the technique
provides quantitative results and their interpretation together with previous results from percussion
tests and the evaluation of other damages observed and monitored, were crucial to determine
whether delamination was in progress in the wall paintings in St. John’s convent at Müstair,
Switzerland (Guelker, Hinsch, and Joost 2001; Hinsch et al. 2009).
Table 4.4. Advantage and disadvantages of DSPI
4.6. CONCLUSION
The use of non-destructive techniques to monitor and identify structural delamination in wall
paintings is documented in the literature, with many examples showing the advantages usually
obtained when these are combined (Menéndez 2016, 198; Amanatiadis et al. 2019, 472-481; Sfarra et
al. 2014, 3480; Casazza and Giovannoni 1991, 15). Generally, the disadvantages associated with one
Advantages Disadvantages
Technique allows reproducible results
(objectiveness)
Results might be hindered by the presence
of unfavourable ambient conditions:
mechanical instability of the floor, adjacent
traffic, external acoustic and optical
interferences
Quantitative results No categorisation among different types and
degree of delamination is possible
Allows the inspection of large surface areas Need for expert or professional figure to
interpret data
Non-contact technique, no risks of damages
caused by pressure
Moderately high costs – these are likely to
be reduced should the technique become
portable and more commonly adopted
P A G E | 60
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
technique can be overcome by the advantages of another. For example, both passive and active
infrared thermography were used to identify possible regions of material inhomogeneity in two
frescoes in Santa Maria della Croce di Roio in L’Aquila (Italy) (Sfarra et al. 2014). Successively, these
were documented and categorised as delamination with the use of DSPI. Moreover, the use of a
technique that provides an holistic overview of the state of preservation of both the wall painting and
the adjacent architectural elements is described as favourable. GPR and Infrared Thermography can
both give valuable information about the internal features of structural elements and the building
performance, thus indicating possible weak areas and suggesting potential causes of delamination.9
The identification of structural delamination in wall paintings is a complex and difficult procedure,
which only reflect the intricate nature of this type of damage. Whilst the non-destructive techniques
described in this chapter offer several methods of achieving a more holistic knowledge of the
structural preservation of the wall painting considered, their involvement during conservation
practice is still quite scarce and most results are based on the traditional percussion method (Hinsch
et al. 2009, 96). Furthermore, results obtained with any of the techniques available are limited: no
qualitative information are provided and no categorisation among different types and degree of
delamination is offered (Hinsch et al. 2009, 103). Finally, understanding the correlation between
structural detachments and the presence of cracks or surface irregularities is a dynamic that needs to
be further researched and studied: hitherto, this potential connection is expressed by Tornari (et al.
2013, 2-3) and Graves (et al. 2017, 219-222).
It can be concluded that obtaining an accurate identification of structural detachments is one of the
most difficult parts of the diagnostic investigation of damages affecting wall paintings. Finally, Table
4.5 is included as a final part of this chapter, to provide a general comparison of the results obtainable
with the described techniques.
9 For instance, cold regions on a thermogram can indicate areas of the building that underwent permanent
deformation and might facilitate the access of external water.
P A G E | 61
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Table 4.5. Comparison of results, advantages and disadvantages of current techniques
Technique Main Advantages Main Disadvantages Results Costs
Visual approach and percussion method
Ease of execution, results
provide an overall indication
of the state of preservation
of the wall painting
Subjective results, mechanical
pressure exerted on the surface,
poor repeatability
Graphic representation
based on the subjective
interpretation of results
Moderate/low – executing the
technique is free, the need of
being able to reach the surface
might involve costly scaffolding
Infrared thermography (IRT)
Valuable information about
the building performance,
non-contact technique, high
depth of measurements (up
to 10 cm depths)
Results might be disturbed by
moisture content of materials,
ununiform heating of the surface,
high surface gloss and irregularities,
need for experts to interpret data
Thermograms –
illustration of the
temperature distribution
Moderately High – Active IRT
Low – Passive IRT
Acoustic methods
High resolution images of
structural defects and
inhomogeneities
Contact technique, results might be
hindered by moisture, the material
heterogeneity, the density, porosity
and anisotropy of materials, surface
irregularities and flaky paint
2D or 3D visual
representation
Moderately High
Electromagnetic imaging techniques
High resolution (THz), high
depth of measurements
(GPR), non-contact
Low depth of measurements (THz),
results might be hindered by
crystallised salts, the material
heterogeneity, the density, porosity
and anisotropy of materials
2D or 3D visual
representation High
Digital speckle pattern interferometry (DSPI)
Non-contact, portable and
easy to operate, quantitative
results easily interpreted
Results might be hindered by
unfavourable ambient conditions:
mechanical instability of the floor,
adjacent traffic, external acoustic and
optical interferences
2D visual
representation/video Moderately High
P A G E | 62
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
5. DECISION-MAKING: DETERMINING TREATMENT NEEDS
Despite the current unsatisfactory state of knowledge of both causes of delamination and methods for
their identification, conservation treatments have been executed in the past mainly by injecting
different types of grouts (Biçer-Şimşir et al. 2009). However, since any conservation treatment
implemented in-situ for the preservation of wall paintings, if carried out without any climate control,
monitoring and mitigation of causes, is considered insufficient to obtain long-term effects (Brajer and
Larsen 2008, 219), questions regarding the successful development of a conservation strategy to treat
this type of damage are raised.
Discussing general conservation approaches of wall paintings can be complex, since both passive and
active treatments can only be formulated according to specific needs and characteristics of the wall
painting examined. This subject is out of the scope of this thesis although it is briefly discussed in 5.1.
This chapter argumentation is based on the following notions: (I) the introduction of current
conservation methodology of structural delamination; (II) the need for developing a decision-making
model to establish specific treatment needs for structural detachments including risks and
limitations of present methods.
5.1. CONSERVATION METHODOLOGY OF STRUCTURAL DELAMINATION
Wall paintings are integral elements of building structures and form an interface between the fabric
of the building and its environment (Mora, Mora and Philippot 1999, 3). Correspondingly, the stability
of both buildings and their environmental conditions are directly correlated to the preservation state
of the wall painting. Therefore, any attempt at treating wall paintings as isolated items, separate from
their building structure and their environment is doomed to failure (Kaszewski 2018).
Traditionally, conservation methodologies and treatments of wall paintings were mainly executed to
fulfil aesthetical requirements and were often based on assumed needs and preconceived
assumptions about condition (Kaszewski 2018; Wong and Rickerby 2013). According to Cather (2003,
412) both causes and risks associated with major damages frequently found in wall paintings have
not been sufficiently studied nor understood, and thus, not all previous treatments might have been
necessary, with some causing further long-term damages. The literature describes a general shift in
both approaches and treatments from remedial interventions to preventive and passive ones (Cather
2003, 412; Tringham et al 2013, 86). These are defined as interventions implemented to address
causes of decay (preventive) and their activation mechanisms (passive). However, it must be
highlighted that these principles should be based on the assumption that conservators can intervene
only to ameliorate ongoing detrimental change and not stop it altogether (Cather 2003, 413).
P A G E | 63
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Denoting this general change in methodology is essential when considering how structural
delamination in wall paintings was diagnosed and treated. Whilst this tendency led to a general
reduction of remedial interventions regarded as potentially invasive (such as overpainting or
extensive retouching), the investigation of structural delamination involved improvements brought
by technological advances (see Chapter 4) whilst their treatment underwent changes mainly related
to the composition of the grouts injected. According to Arnold’s hierarchy of conservation approaches,
remedial treatment, like injection grouting, are only effective at strengthening the object (Cather 2003,
413). Therefore, in the following paragraph the practice of executing such treatment is brought into
question: it felt necessary to outline a method to determine whether remedial treatment is indeed
required and eventually understand whether its effectiveness can be enhanced by passive and
preventive measures or even exceeded by these.
5.2. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEED FOR STRUCTURAL TREATMENT
The aim of this section is to elaborate a method of determining the treatment needs for wall paintings
affected by structural delamination, taking in consideration the limitations outlined in Chapters 3 and
4.10 Since each wall painting is considered a unique case study, with specific needs and challenges, this
argumentation is developed as a broad point of reflection. The need for structural treatments should
be formulated by the interpretation of results obtained through a diagnostic investigation comprised
of four procedures (Cather 2003, 416; Tringham et al. 2013, 86; Wong et al. 2013, 215):
I. Conservation history of the wall painting: to document previous conservation treatments,
gather archival photos to evaluate the progress of decay of the wall painting and identify
previous adverse remedial treatments. A research on the composition of these materials and
their potential influence on the development of delamination should outlined.
II. Identification of original and previous conservation materials: to obtain information
about binders and aggregates used, to identify previous conservation materials, allow their
distinction from original ones, assess their stability and potential compatibility with current
conservation materials. Ideas on the overall materials stability and potential intrinsic and
extrinsic causes of damage and delamination should be formulated.
III. Condition monitoring: ideally carried out over an extended period of time (at least one year)
to allow documentation and mapping of changes in relation to seasonal cycles, by obtaining
10 i.e. difficulties in obtaining reliable results regarding the identification of detached areas and the challenge of
determining the causes or activation mechanisms that generated the structural detachments.
P A G E | 64
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
environmental measurements of RH and T (ideally both external and internal), and
understand the buffering function of the building. An overall picture of the relation between
building and wall painting should be framed together with an hypothesis on the potential
causes of structural delamination.
IV. Assessment of rate of change: this should provide information on the evolution of
delamination over time. One or a combination of technical analysis (as described in Chapter
4) should be implemented at regular intervals over an extended period of time (at least one
year) to understand if delamination is in progress, quantify its severity and frequency and
reinforce or weaken the previously formulated hypothesis on the potential causes of damage.
Due to the complexity of the system analysed (formed by the building, the wall painting and both
external and internal environments) this initial diagnostic approach should be flexible and allow the
re-assessment and re-interpretation of data accumulated (Cather 2003, 416). Executing diagnostic
research in situ is far more easily advocated than practised, due to limitations of site-specific logistics
and potential complications in implementing technical analysis. Generally, diagnostic investigation
can be extremely challenging and the possibility of retaining certain questions unanswered is likely
(Wong et al. 2013, 215). Consequently, the need for elaborating a decision-making model that can
incorporate case-specific characteristics is expressed. The model should not provide a single and
definitive answer regarding the severity of structural delamination, but it should be designed in such
a way that all questions can be independently answered and that only by the ultimate interpretation
of results, the user can allocate a ‘type of delamination’11 and its consequent need for treatment
(Bolhuis et al. 2017, 1-7). To further outline the necessity of establishing a decision-making model to
assess the need for remedial treatment of delamination in wall paintings, a brief evaluation of the risks
associated with the current treatment (i.e. injection grouting) is provided in the next paragraph.
5.2.1. INJECTION GROUTING: RISKS AND LIMITATIONS
Currently, structural treatments of delamination in wall paintings involve the injection of grouts, a
bulked fluid material with adhesive properties, through pre-drilled holes specifically executed to
allow the access of either a syringe or a small tube. Despite being an irreversible treatment, grouting
is considered an important method for the stabilisation of architectural surfaces in situ (Biçer-Şimşir
et al. 2009, 3). The latter started to be implemented as an alternative to detaching wall paintings and
mosaics approximately in the late 1970s, with the earliest published research dating back to the
11 This should not be confused with the different types of delamination described in 3.1. The name ‘type’ here is
taken from the terminology ‘type of risks’ expressed by Waller in his article about risk assessments, and it is used
to describe the extent of damage (i.e. structural delamination) based on its severity and frequency (see 5.3).
P A G E | 65
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
1980’s. Because of the invasive and irreversible nature of injection grouting, much of its development
focused on two main parameters: the compatibility with original materials and the re-treatability.
Therefore, a variety of materials combination, usually involving a binder, a filler, a suspension medium
and sometimes some additives (such as plasticisers, fluidisers and retarders) together with a variety
of commercially available products have been used to reinstate the adhesive and cohesive properties
of mortars and renderings (Pasian et al. 2018, 1).
Generally, conservators tend to generate grouts with similar material composition of the mortar
involved in the structure of the wall painting treated, with the aim of replicating its working properties
and performance characteristics. However, these types of grout would not produce properties
desirable for injection and would possess stronger adhesive properties then the original mortar, since
this would be in a weak and deteriorated state (Biçer-Şimşir et al. 2009, 4). As a result, additives were
involved with the aim of increasing flow and modify the curing properties of grouts. Currently, only
one analytical study regarding their working properties and performance characteristics exist (Biçer-
Şimşir and Rainer 2011).
A few general risks, both intrinsic and extrinsic, can be described. According to Rickerby et al. (2004,
481), the successful injection of grouts mainly depends on the experience and judgment of the
conservator. Therefore, the level of inexperience of the practising conservator can be a factor of risk,
especially when considering that the treatment involves the drilling of injection holes. Other adverse
effects can be caused by the specific material composition of the grout injected (Biçer-Şimşir et al.
2009, 4). In particular, the need for creating a fluid material required the addition of both fluidisers
and diluents, like water. The latter can potentially generate the harmful re-dissolution and re-
crystallisation of salts (see 3.3.1 and 3.3.3) . Finally, as aforementioned, grouts can exhibit excessive
adhesive and mechanical strengths, due to their composition. This can generate mechanical damages
with consequent permanent deformations, due the to the different reaction of grouts and original
mortar to thermal, external or internal stresses (Torraca 2009, 69,86; Torraca 2005, 119). Ironically,
it can be concluded that injection grouting can hypothetically result in additional damages to the
structure of wall paintings.
5.3. DEVELOPMENT OF DECISION-MAKING MODEL
The identification and treatment of structural delamination is a substantially complex task to execute.
A decision-making model should be formulated as an aiding tool to help conservators to address this
phenomenon from two perspectives: (I) diagnostic investigation; (II) comparison of remedial, passive
and preventive interventions. The first part of the decision-making model should be framed to
accurately document and interpret data acquired during a diagnostic investigation, assess the severity
of damage and a correspondent treatment needs and urgency. Ideally, the model should be flexible
P A G E | 66
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
and allow a ‘custom-made’ design so that it can be shaped around case specific characteristics. Finally,
to help conservator in assessing the need for treatment of delamination, a table, such as the one
illustrated by Waller (1994, 12), depicting different grades of frequency and severity of damage is
included in the model (see Table 5.1). This way, the user would be able to allocate a ‘type of
delamination’ and therefore judge the treatment need for the wall painting studied. The second part
of the decision-making model should be formulated to allow the comparison of different existing
remedial, passive and preventive interventions. This should include an evaluation of grouts
composition, their affinity with original materials and application as indicated by Turk et al. (2019).
The latter is out of the scope of this thesis, however its elaboration and implementation during
conservation practice are considered advantageous and represent an area of study in need of further
research.
Examples of decision-making models (The Foundation for the Conservation of Contemporary Art
(SBMK) 1999; Bolhuis et al. 2017, 1-7), guidelines for the conservation of wall paintings (ICOMOS
Principles for the Preservation of Wall Paintings 2003; Historic England 2002) and other publications
(Wong et al. 2013, 15; 2012, 1) have been consulted to allow the initial argumentation of the first part
of the decision-making model. As suggested by Bolhuis et al (2017, 2), the decision-making model
should be designed as a series of open questions that need to be answered and weighed so that the
user can both interpret the results obtained and also decide if certain aspects are more or less
important to the specific case-study analysed. The questions composing the model should be built
around the four categories outlined in 5.2: (I) Conservation history of the wall painting; (II)
Identification of original materials; (III) Condition monitoring; (IV) Assessment of the rate change.
Other parameters, such as, budget and significance, would be included in the second part of the
decision-making model.
Lastly, the structure of the model should allow the user to make his/her own assessments based on
the interpretation of results and to allocate a ‘type of delamination’ as shown in Table 5.1. The
flexibility of the questionnaire would allow the creation of a table with specific characteristics of
severity and frequency, that are within the scope of the wall painting studied and that reflect the
results obtained. This is due to the ascertained complexity of the phenomenon of structural
delamination and the need for elaborating results and interpretations that are individual to the case
study. As a result, the conservator would be able to add detailed observations peculiar to the type of
delamination identified or to damages triggered by this, especially in relation to the presence of
surface cracks and irregularities.
P A G E | 67
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Table 5.1: Example of table involved to define treatment needs for structural delamination
Finally, the conservator should be able to allocate one of the four treatment needs described in the
Guidelines for Assessment and Recommendations of Wall Paintings in Danish Churches of the National
Museum of Denmark (n.d.). It must be reminded that the ultimate choice on the type of treatment to
implement should be executed by completing the second part of the decision-making model.
I. Acutely in need for treatment: indicating an enhanced plaster instability and urgency of
treatment together with the need for ameliorating causes and activation mechanisms of
delamination (passive/preventive measures) (as in the case of the Cave 85 in the Mogao
Grottoes, Rickerby et al 2004, 480-486).
II. In need for treatment: referring to an unstable condition of the structure of the wall
paintings where a combination of passive and preventive interventions need to be
implemented with the aim of reaching a status as described in sections III and IV.
III. Possibly in need for treatment: where delamination is only moderately present and any
intervention should aim at stabilising the system by addressing causes and activation
mechanisms (passive/preventive measures).
IV. Satisfactory condition: describing a situation where delamination might be identified as
stable, thus, indicating the need for maintaining a regular inspection and monitoring strategy.
Severity
Fre
qu
ency
Structural
Delamination
1: Ongoing
progress: unstable
2: No visible signs of
ongoing progress: unstable
3: Inactive:
stable
1: Widespread
2: Major
3: Moderate
4: Limited
P A G E | 68
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
5.4. PROTOTYPE OF THE DECISION-MAKING MODEL
An initial prototype of the decision-making model described in the previous section is here presented.
This should only be regarded as a first layout of the model, which would require consequent editing
and re-formatting, both of its content and shape. Ideally, the model would consists of a total of four
sheets, each indicating an area of diagnostic investigation, as described in section 5.2. Moreover, the
model would include a manual for use and a glossary (see Appendix VIII) .
The four tables comprising this prototype are reported in this section (Fig. 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4) and a list
of all the questions composing the model is reported in Appendix VII. Whilst all the information
gathered from the decision-making model are considered essential for the purpose of establishing the
need for treatment of delamination, several questions are highlighted throughout the model. These
are deemed particularly meaningful to achieve the aforementioned scope of the model and ultimately
appoint one of the four treatment needs described in 5.3. Further research should focus on
establishing the suitability of the questions included and the overall effectiveness of the model in
conservation practice.
P A G E | 69
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.5.1: Table 1 of the prototype of decision-making model. Photo credit: Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 70
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.5.2: Table 2 of the prototype of decision-making model. Photo credit: Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 71
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.5.3: Table 3 of the prototype of decision-making model. Photo credit: Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 72
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig.5.4: Table 4 of the prototype of decision-making model. Photo credit: Valentina Gatto
P A G E | 73
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
6. MARIA CHURCH AND THE WALL PAINTINGS: A REVISION
The case study of the wall paintings in Maria Church in Nisse exhaustively represents the limitations
encountered when approaching the diagnosis of structural detachments. The identification of this
type of structural damage is often approached in conservation practice with the percussion method,
a cumbersome technique, which often generates incongruent results (Guelker, Hinsch, and Joost 2001,
184). Furthermore, conservation treatments, often based on preconceived assumptions of the state of
preservation of the murals, mainly involve the injection of different type of grouts. As described in
Chapter 5, the long-term effectiveness of such remedial treatments are in need of further research and
evaluation.
The aim of the final chapter of this thesis is to accomplish an assessment of the information gathered
from the previous conservation reports of the wall paintings in Maria Church, to elaborate the
succeeding concepts: (I) potential causes of structural delamination; (II) suitable identification
methods for the identification of delamination. Lastly, this case study offers the opportunity to
implement and test, for the first time, the potential effectiveness of the prototype of the decision-
making model outlined in section 5.4.
6.1. POTENTIAL CAUSES OF STRCUTURAL DELAMINATION
As described in Chapter 3, the causes usually associated with the development of structural
delamination are complex and their occurrence is often simultaneous and interdependent. Generally,
it can be argued that the current condition of the wall paintings in Maria Church have been severely
affected by both environmental conditions and previous adverse conservation treatments.
The main environmental factors considered potentially responsible for the formation of detachments
are the previous leaking of water from the roof and fluctuations of relative humidity (Crijns,
Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden 2020). Moisture in building is considered the main cause of
degradation of wall paintings and a fundamental trigger of secondary reactions responsible for the
disintegration of their structure (Mora, Mora and Philippot 1999, 174). Therefore, the role of moisture
is essential for the phenomenon of migration and re-crystallisation of salts and for the consequent
chemical degradation and dissolution of lime (see 3.3 and Appendix VI). Moreover, the formation of
structural detachments in the wall paintings in Maria Church can be correlated to the presence of bats.
Bats droppings and urine can have deleterious effects on porous materials like lime, marble or stone
(Hales 2014, 98). Droppings were documents on the upper area of the wall paintings on the triumphal
arch (Jorien Duivenvoorden, email to author, March 19, 2020) and on the door below the wall painting
P A G E | 74
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
of St. Christopher (Fig. 6.1, 6.2, 6.3). The main influence of bats dropping and urine on the formation
of delamination are attributed to the subsequent deposition of salts and dissolution of lime.
Additionally, the location of the wall painting of St. Christopher is considered favourable for the
development of structural delamination. The mural is positioned on the north side of the church and
is integrated within a wall that is directly exposed to the outer environment. The formation of
condensation, caused by the positioning of the wall painting on the coldest area of the church and the
direct exposure of the building support to atmospheric agents, might contribute to the development
of delamination.
Previous conservation treatments executed in Maria Church are argued to have strongly influenced
the development of delamination in the structure of the wall paintings. The cleaning of their pictorial
surface with acetic acid (80% in aqueous solution) is believed to have generated structural damages.
Acetic acid can dissolve calcium carbonate to form a salt, calcium acetate (Fig. 6.4),thus contributing
to the formation of structural delamination.
2CH3COOH + CaCO3
acetic acid + calcium carbonate
(CH3COOH)Ca + CO2 + H2O calcium acetate + carbon dioxide + water
Fig.6.4: Reaction of acetic acid and calcium carbonate. The latter is dissolved to form a salt, calcium acetate
Fig.6.1, 6.2, 6.3: Door below the wall painting depicting St. Christopher showing signs of bats droppings and
possible degradation of the polychrome surface due to urine and high relative humidity.
P A G E | 75
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Furthermore, the injection of a two-component synthetic adhesive to re-establish the adhesive and
cohesive properties of the structure of the wall paintings, the filling of lacunae with a hardened
gypsum-based material and the final application of a PVA resin to consolidate the pictorial surface
could have strongly contributed to the formation of delamination. Whilst all these materials possess
different permeability properties, only the synthetic grout and PVA resin become hydrophobic, once
cured. As a result these materials can generate the deflection or interruption of moisture passage with
the subsequent change of the evaporation zone leading to localised internal stresses that can cause
the mechanical failure of the surrounding original material.
The accurate identification of the causes of structural delamination in the wall paintings in Maria
Church would require a through in-situ assessment and, potentially, the interpretation of samples to
obtain more precise information regarding the layer archaeology of the murals and the hydraulic and
mechanical properties of its constituent materials. Therefore, the argumentation of this paragraph
represents an initial assumption of the potential causes of delamination.
6.2. SUITABLE METHODS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF STRUCTURAL DELAMINATION
The wall paintings in Maria Church significantly exemplify the need for implementing, during
conservation practice, a more scientific and objective method to document structural detachments.
The involvement of different executions of the percussion method to document delaminated regions
in the wall paintings on the triumphal arch are described by Crevecoeur (2017) and by Crijns,
Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden (2020) respectively (see 2.4). The results obtained are strikingly
conflicting, with one implementation indicating the presence of 96 locations of structurally detached
areas (Crevecoeur, 2017) and another one detecting only 44 (Crijns, Morelissen, and Duivenvoorden
2020). The scarce repeatability of this method and the pronounced influence of the experience of the
conservator involved during the investigation are clearly outlined in the remarkable difference of
these results.
The layout of the historical building, the surface topography and the pictorial preservation state of the
wall paintings considered can have a profound influence on the choice of the identification technique.
The wall paintings in Maria Church are differently integrated within the building and, thus, different
approaches might be in need. The wall painting of St. Christopher appears more easily reachable than
the murals on the triumphal arch. As a result, techniques that require the direct contact with the
surface of the mural, such as the ultrasonic method, could be considered for this mural (see Chapter
4). The wall paintings on the triumphal arch are more difficult to reach, hence, the implementation of
a technique that can be used remotely, such as DSPI, GPR and THz Imaging, would be ideal. As
aforementioned, the state of preservation of the pictorial surface and its topography are crucial factors
to consider, when selecting a suitable technique. Whilst the pictorial surface of all murals is considered
P A G E | 76
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
in a good state of conservation, hence, possibly indicating the suitability of a technique that requires
the close contact with their surface, their topography appears quite irregular and undulated (see
section 2.4 and Fig.2.11). This aspect might hinder the adequate contact between the sensor and the
surface, thus interfering with the successful attainment of results. Moreover, the use of an ultrasonic
technique for the identification of structural detachments in the wall paintings on the triumphal arch
would require the construction of either a scaffolding or a movable platform. The potential influence
of the vibrations generated by a movable platform could produce an increase of the deterioration rate
of the wall paintings and worsen its structural instability (see 3.4.2).
Consequently, during a preliminary inspection of the church, conducted with Merel Schrojenstein
Lantman12 and Roger Groves13, the most suitable technique to identify structurally delaminated areas
in the wall painting in Maria Church was deemed to be DSPI. However, this method presents some
disadvantages that require some adjustments. The distance between the floor and the wall paintings
on the triumphal arch is too great and the equipment needs to be placed closer by using a ladder or a
zip-up scaffold. Furthermore, the wall painting of St. Christopher is located on the north wall, in front
of a glass window. The solar light might interfere with the laser beam of the technique, ultimately
compromising the results. For this reason, testing of the wall painting of St. Christopher, might have
to be performed either after sunset or with the use of a shielding material to be placed over the
windows. Due to its positioning on the north area of the church and the direct exposure of its building
structure to the outer environment, structural delamination in the wall painting of St. Christopher is
hypothesised to be more enhanced than in the wall paintings on the triumphal arch.
Lastly, the lower area of the wall painting of St. Christopher can be easily reached and inspected with
a ladder; this will allow the additional assessment of the suitability of the ultrasonic method, to verify
whether the transducer can be appropriately placed in contact with the surface. Specifically, the
method of phased array ultrasonic testing will be involved in this phase. This portable equipment
consists of many small ultrasonic transducers that can be activated independently, thus allowing the
progressive steering of the beam and the formation of images showing material inhomogeneities
(Roger Groves, personal communication, 26 March, 2020) (see 4.3). The main advantages of this
method are the following: the absence of any gel or liquid between the transducer and the surface (as
this is already present within the transducer) and the possibility of controlling the direction of
ultrasonic beam electronically (and not manually), thus conveying results in a faster manner.
12 Lecturer of the Conservation of Historic Interior specialisation at the University of Amsterdam and freelance
accredited conservator.
13 Associate Professor of the Aerospace Engineering Department at TU Delft.
P A G E | 77
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
6.3. STRUCTURAL DELAMINATION: HOW TO DETERMINE TREATMENT NEEDS?
The treatment needs for a wall painting affected by structural delamination should be elaborated by
the interpretation of results obtained through a diagnostic investigation based on the four procedures
described in 5.2. and 5.4 (see Fig. 5.1- 5.5). The RCE started a diagnostic investigation to determine
the general treatments needs for the wall paintings in Maria Church in 2019. Only the initial phase of
this investigation was executed and, as a result, an argumentation to whether the wall paintings are
in need for structural treatments is currently unattainable. However, this case-study offers the
opportunity to test the implementation of the prototype of the model for the first the time and,
potentially, assess its effectiveness. Furthermore the initial steps of the decision-making model can be
completed, thus allowing the elaboration of hypothesis regarding causes of delamination (see 6.1) and
the identification of a suitable method for their identification (see 6.2).
P A G E | 78
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
7. CONCLUSION AND FURTHER RESEARCH
The main purpose of this master’s thesis is to obtain an insightful understanding of the process of
formation of structural detachments in wall paintings. This study is considered a literature review of
potential causes of structural detachments and methods of their identification. Additionally, it is
regarded as a starting point for the development of a decision-making model to establish specific
treatment needs for structural detachments.
Detachments are physical forms of damage induced by either external or internal mechanical stresses
resulting in the progressive loss of adhesive and cohesive properties of heterogenous layers in the
structure of wall paintings (Wang 2011, 121; Fricke-Begemann, Gu, and Joost 2000, 538). Causes of
delamination are complex and their occurrence is generally concurrent and interdependent (Mora
1974, 11). As a result, their precise identification can be a rather intricate task. A correlation of
intrinsic, extrinsic and environmental factors can cause physical and chemical degradation processes
that can generate structural delamination (D’Ossat 1982, 8-24). Future research should focus on
corroborating the influence of acidic conditions and the migration and re-crystallisation of salts on
the chemical dissolution of calcite. Lastly, an elevated presence of moisture in building materials is
regarded as a fundamental activation mechanism of causes of delamination: its monitoring and
control should always be prioritised.
In conservation practice, the identification of structural detachments in wall paintings is
predominately obtained by documenting the acoustic response generated by the tapping of the
pictorial surface and its subsequent interpretation (Hinsch et al. 2009, 96; Guelker, Hinsch, and Joost
2001, 188). This method, known as the percussion approach, can generate confusing results due to its
poor repeatability and subjectivity; the case study of the wall paintings in Maria Church exhaustively
illustrates the limitations of this methods. Suitable and effective techniques to identify structural
damages involve the implementation of: IRT (Infrared Thermography), ultrasonic techniques, GPR
(Ground penetrating radar), THz Imaging (Terahertz Imaging) and DSPI (Digital Speckle Pattern
Interferometry). All the above-mentioned techniques, excluding ultrasonic ones, are non-contact and
offer a variety of resolution of images (the sharpest being THz Imaging) and depth of measurements
(the highest being GPR). Signal attenuation and backscattering are considered the most significant
disadvantages and are caused by the heterogeneity of structural materials of wall paintings.
Furthermore, results obtained with any of these techniques are limited: no qualitative information are
provided and no categorisation among different types and degree of delamination is offered (Hinsch
et al. 2009, 103). Finally, understanding the correlation between structural detachments and the
presence of cracks or surface irregularities is a dynamic that needs to be further researched (Tornari
et al. 2013, 2-3; Graves et al. 2017, 219-222).
P A G E | 79
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
The case study of the wall paintings in Maria Church is considered to extensively illustrate the present
problematics encountered in conservation practice. Current conservation treatments mainly involve
the injection of different types of grouts to re-establish the structural cohesiveness of wall paintings
affected by delamination (Biçer-Şimşir et al. 2009). However, the implementation of this irreversible
procedure is rarely justified and long-term effects of the adhesive mixtures injected need to be
evaluated; it is hypothesised that some of these materials could have adversely affected the structural
stability of murals. Therefore, interests for the development of a decision-making model to establish
the specific needs for treatment of structural delamination is deduced: a prototype of decision-making
model is outlined in this thesis and the effectiveness of both contents and layout needs to be assessed.
P A G E | 80
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
8. REFERENCE LIST
8.1. BOOKS, CHAPTERS OF EDITED BOOKS, JOURNAL ARTICLES, CONFERENCE PAPERS, AND
DISSERTATIONS
Adams, G., J. Bucaro, E. Esposito, A. J. Kurdila, B. Marchetti, E. P. Tomasini, and J. F. Vignola. 2005. "A
Case Study of Frescoes Diagnostics by Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometry (SLDV): The
Brumidi Corridors and The President’s Room at The United States Capitol." In Lasers in the
Conservation of Artworks: LACONA V Proceedings, Osnabrück, Germany, 15-18 September 2003,
edited by Klaus Dickmann, Costas Fotakis, and John F. Asmus, 525–528.. Berlin, Heidelberg:
Springer.
Adams, George W. 2006. "A Practical Technique for Injection of Consolidants behind Wall and Ceiling
Paintings." APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology 37, (2/3): 33–36.
Amanatiadis, Stamatios, Georgios Apostolidis, and Georgios Karagiannis. 2019. " Fusion of the Infrared
Imaging and the Ultrasound Techniques to Enhance the Sub-surface Characterization." In
Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural
Heritage: First International Conference, TMM_CH 2018, Athens, Greece, October 10–13, 2018,
Revised Selected Papers, Part II, edited by Antonia Moropoulou, Manolis Korres, Andreas
Georgopoulos, Constantine Spyrakos, and Charalambos Mouzakis. Cham: Springer
International Publishing.
Asp, Misa. 2001. "Test of Injectable Mortars in Laboratory and Field." In Conservation of Mural
Paintings, edited by Ulf Lindborg, 39–44 . Stockholm: National Heritage Board.
Biçer-Şimşir, Beril, and Leslie Rainer. 2011. Evaluation of Lime-Based Hydraulic Injection Grouts for the
Conservation of Architectural Surfaces: A Manual of Laboratory and Field Test Methods. Los
Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
Biçer-Şimşir, Beril, and Leslie Rainer. 2014. "Field Test Methods for Comparative Evaluation of Lime-
Based Hydraulic Injection Grouts for the Conservation of Architectural Surfaces." In ICOM-CC
17th Triennial Conference Preprints, Melbourne, Australia, 15-19 September 2014, edited by J.
Bridgland, 10 pp. Paris: International Council of Museum.
Biçer-Şimşir, Beril, Isobel Griffin, Bénédicte Palazzo-Bertholon, and Leslie Rainer. 2009. "Lime-Based
Injection Grouts for the Conservation of Architectural Surfaces." Studies in Conservation 54
(sup1): 3 17.
Boaglio, E., J. Lamas, Ana J. López, A. Ramil, L. Pereira, B. Prieto, and B. Silva. 2012. "Development of a
Portable ESPI System for the Analysis in Situ of Mural Paintings." In SPECKLE 2012: V
International Conference on Speckle Metrology, Vigo, Spain, 11 September 2012, vol. 8413,
edited by Ángel F. Doval, Cristina Trillo, J. Carlos Lopez-Vazquez, 8413141–8413146. Vigo:
International Society for Optics and Photonics.
P A G E | 81
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Bolhuis, Jan, B.Lubelli, R. van Hees, M. van Hunen, Y. Vanhellemont. 2017. "Decision support tool – Een
Humlpmiddel voor Architecten, Aannemers en Gebouweigenaren om een Goed Onderbouwde
Keuze te Kunnen Maken voor een (Combinatie van) Interventie(s) Tegen Optrekkend Vocht."
In Optrekkend Grondvocht, Roosendaal, Netherlands, 21 April, 2017, edited by Yves
Vanhellemont, Rob van Hees, and Nathalie Vernimme, 1-7. Roosendaal: Delft University of
Technology, KULeuven.
Boone, Pierre M, B Markov, M Burykin, and V Ovsyannikov. 1997. "Coherent-Optical Localization and
Assessment of Importance of Damage and Defects of Cultural Heritage." NDT&E International
30, (2): 61– 67.
Brajer, Isabelle, and Poul Klenz Larsen. 2008. "The Salt Reduction Treatment on the Wall Paintings in
Tirsted Church." In Salt Weathering on Buildings and Stone Sculptures (SWBSS), The National
Museum Copenhagen, Proceedings from the International Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark,
22-24 October, 2008, 219-228. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
Calicchia, Paola, and Giovanni Bosco Cannelli. 2005. "Detecting and Mapping Detachments in Mural
Paintings by Non-Invasive Acoustic Technique: Measurements in Antique Sites in Rome and
Florence." Journal of Cultural Heritage 6 (2): 115–124.
Casazza Ornella, and Sabino Giovannoni. 1991. "Preliminary Research for the Conservation of the
Brancacci Chapel, Florence." In The Conservation of Wall Paintings: Proceedings of a
Symposium Organized by the Courtauld Institute of Art and the Getty Conservation Institute,
London, United Kingdom, 13-16 July, 1987, edited by Sharon Cather, 13–20. London: The Getty
Conservation Institute.
Catapano, I., G. Ludeno, C. Cucci, M. Picollo, L. Stefani, and K. Fukunaga. 2020. "Noninvasive Analytical
and Diagnostic Technologies for Studying Early Renaissance Wall Paintings." Surveys in
Geophysics 41 (3): 669–693.
Cather, Sharon. 2003. "Assessing Causes and Mechanism of Detrimental Change to Wall Paintings." In
Archaeological Sites: Conservation and Management, 412–424. Los Angeles: The Getty
Conservation Institute.
Cennino Cennini. 1940. The Book of Art of Cennino Cennini: A Contemporary Practical Treatise on
Quattrocento Painting. London: George Allen, Ruskin House.
Collini, L. 2011. "A Non-Destructive, Contactless Technique for the Health Monitoring of Ancient
Frescoes." In Structural Dynamics, Volume 3: Conference Proceedings of the Society for
Experimental Mechanics Series, edited by Tom Proulx, 867–74. New York, NY: Springer New
York.
D’Ossat, Guglielmo De Angelis. 1982. Guide to the Methodical Study of Monuments and Causes of Their
Deterioration. 2nd edition. Rome: Faculty of Architecture University of Rome, ICCROM.
Dabb, Lyle M. 1971. "Calcium Carbonate Dissolution and Precipitation in Water: Factors Affecting the
Carbonate Saturometer Method." MSc Thesis, Utah State University.
P A G E | 82
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Dandolo, Corinna Ludovica Koch, and Peter Uhd Jepsen. 2016. ‘Wall Painting Investigation by Means
of Non-Invasive Terahertz Time-Domain Imaging (THz-TDI): Inspection of Subsurface
Structures Buried in Historical Plasters’. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves
37 (2): 198–208.
Doehne, Eric Ferguson, and Clifford A. Price. 2010. Stone Conservation: An Overview of Current
Research. 2nd edition. Los Angeles, California: The Getty Conservation Institute.
Drácky M., and J. Lesák. 2006. " Non-invasive Survey of Detachment of Historic Rendering." In
Heritage, Weathering and Conservation, Volume II: Proceedings of the International Heritage,
Weathering and Conservation Conference (HWC-2006), Madrid, Spain, 21-24 June, 2006, edited
by Rafael Fort, Monica Alvarez de Buergo, Miguel Gomez-Heras, and Carmen Vazquez-Calvo,
591–598. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Fais, Silvana, Francesco Cuccuru, Paola Ligas, Giuseppe Casula, and Maria G. Bianchi. 2017. "Integrated
Ultrasonic, Laser Scanning and Petrographical Characterisation of Carbonate Building
Materials on an Architectural Structure of a Historic Building." Bulletin of Engineering Geology
and the Environment 76 (1): 71–84.
Fricke-Begemann, Thomas, Gerd Gu, and Holger Joost. 2000. "Mural Inspection by Vibration
Measurements with TV-Holography." Optics and Lasers in Engineering 32 (6): 537-548.
Garg, K.L., Kamal K. Jain, and A.K. Mishra. 1995. "Role of Fungi in the Deterioration of Wall Paintings."
Science of the Total Environment 167 (1–3): 255–71.
González, José María Salvador. 2013. "The Iconography of the Coronation of the Virgin in Late
Medieval Italian Painting. A Case Study." Eikón Imago 2 (1): 1-48.
Güelker, Gerd, Klaus D. Hinsch, and Holger Joost. 2001. "Large-Scale Investigation of Plaster
Detachments in Historical Murals by Acoustic Stimulation and Video-Holographic Detection."
In Laser Techniques and Systems in Art Conservation, Munich, Germany, 22 October, 2001, vol.
4402, edited by Renzo Salimbeni, 184–193. Munich: International Society for Optics and
Photonics.
Gülker, G., H. Helmers, K.D. Hinsch, P. Meinlschmidt, and K. Wolff. 1996. "Deformation Mapping and
Surface Inspection of Historical Monuments." Optics and Lasers in Engineering 24 (2–3): 183–
213.
Hales, James. 2014. "Bats in Churches: Objective Assessment of Associated Damage Mechanisms."
Archaeology International 17: 94–108.
Hinsch, Klaus D., Konrad Zehnder, Holger Joost, and Gerd Gülker. 2009. "Monitoring Detaching Murals
in the Convent of Müstair (Switzerland) by Optical Metrology." Journal of Cultural Heritage 10
(1): 94–105.
Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente, Jean-Marc Piau, Stéphane Guilbert, Nicolas P. Avdelidis, Marc Genest,
Abdelhakim Bendada, and Xavier P. V. Maldague. 2009. "Comparative Study of Active
Thermography Techniques for the Nondestructive Evaluation of Honeycomb Structures."
Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 20 (1): 1–31.
P A G E | 83
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Karaiskos, G., A. Deraemaeker, D. G. Aggelis, and D. van Hemelrijck. 2015. "Monitoring of Concrete
Structures Using the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Method." Smart Materials and Structures 24
(11): 113001 – 113018.
Kordatos, E.Z., D.A. Exarchos, C. Stavrakos, A. Moropoulou, and T.E. Matikas. 2013. "Infrared
Thermographic Inspection of Murals and Characterization of Degradation in Historic
Monuments". Construction and Building Materials 48 : 1261– 1265.
Lasyk, Łukasz, Michał Łukomski, Tone Marie Olstad, and Annika Haugen. 2012. "Digital Speckle
Pattern Interferometry for the Condition Surveys of Painted Wood: Monitoring the Altarpiece
in the Church in Hedalen, Norway." Journal of Cultural Heritage 13 (3): S102–108.
Lucia, A.C., P.M. Zanetta, and M. Facchini. 1997. "Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry Applied to
the Study and Conservation of Paintings". Optics and Lasers in Engineering 26 (2–3): 221–33.
Maev, R. G., R. E. Green, and A. M. Siddiolo. 2006. "Review of Advanced Acoustical Imaging Techniques
for Nondestructive Evaluation of Art Objects." Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 17 (4):
191–204.
Mancinelli, Fabrizio. 1991. "The Frescoes of Michelangelo on the Vault of the Sistine Chapel:
Conservation Methodology, Problems, and Results." In The Conservation of Wall Paintings:
Proceedings of a Symposium Organized by the Courtauld Institute of Art and the Getty
Conservation Institute, London, United Kingdom, 13-16 July, 1987, edited by Sharon Cather, 57–
66. London: The Getty Conservation Institute.
McCann, D.M., and M.C. Forde. 2001. "Review of NDT Methods in the Assessment of Concrete and
Masonry Structures." NDT & E International 34 (2): 71–84.
Menéndez, Beatriz. 2016. "Non-Destructive Techniques Applied to Monumental Stone Conservation."
In Non-Destructive Testing, edited by Fausto Pedro Garcia Marquez, Mayorkinos Papaelias,
and Noor Zaman, 173–211. InTechOpen.
Menningen, Johanna, Siegfried Siegesmund, Daryl Tweeton, and Markus Träupmann. 2018.
"Ultrasonic Tomography: Non-Destructive Evaluation of the Weathering State on a Marble
Obelisk, Considering the Effects of Structural Properties." Environmental Earth Sciences 77
(17): 601-1–601-25.
Mercuri, F., C. Cicero, N. Orazi, S. Paoloni, M. Marinelli, and U. Zammit. 2015. "Infrared Thermography
Applied to the Study of Cultural Heritage." International Journal of Thermophysics 36 (5–6):
1189–1194.
Mora, Paolo, Laura Mora, and Paul Philippot. 1999. La Conservazione Delle Pitture Murali. Bologna:
ICCROM, International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and the Restoration of Cultural
Property.
Mora, Paolo. 1974. Causes of Deterioration of Mural Paintings. Rome: ICCROM, International Centre for
The Study of the Preservation andf the Restoration of Cultural Property.
Nuzzo, Luigia, Nicola Masini, Enzo Rizzo, and Rosa Lasaponara. 2008. "Integrated and Multiscale NDT
for the Study of Architectural Heritage". In Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS
P A G E | 84
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Applications, and Geology VIII, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 13 October, 2008, vol. 7110, edited by
Ulrich Michel, Daniel L. Civco, Manfred Ehlers, and Hermann J. Kaufmann, 711015-1– 711015-
8. Cardiff: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Paoletti, D., and G. S. Spagnolo. 1993. "Application of Fibre Optic Digital Speckle Interferometry to
Mural Painting Diagnostics." Measurement Science and Technology 4 (5): 614–618.
Pasian, Chiara, Michele Secco, Francesca Piqué, Gilberto Artioli, Stephen Rickerby, and Sharon Cather.
2018. "Lime-Based Injection Grouts with Reduced Water Content: An Assessment of the
Effects of the Water-Reducing Agents Ovalbumin and Ethanol on the Mineralogical Evolution
and Properties of Grouts." Journal of Cultural Heritage 30: 70–80.
Pereira, A., F. Palha, J. de Brito, and J.D. Silvestre. 2011. "Inspection and Diagnosis System for Gypsum
Plasters in Partition Walls and Ceilings." Construction and Building Materials 25 (4): 2146–
2156.
Philippot, Paul, and Paolo Mora. 1968. "The Conservation of Wall Paintings." In The Conservation of
Cultural Property, with Special Reference to Tropical Conditions, 169–189. Rome: ICCROM,
International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and the Restoration of Cultural
Property.
Piqué, Francesca, E. Ferroni, and L. Dei. 1992. "Physicochemical Aspects of the Deliquescence of
Calcium Nitrate and Its Implications for Wall Painting Conservation." Studies in Conservation
37 (4): 217–227.
Preusser, Frank. 1991. "Scientific and Technical Examination of the Tomb of Queen Nefertari at
Thebes." In The Conservation of Wall Paintings: Proceedings of a Symposium Organized by the
Courtauld Institute of Art and the Getty Conservation Institute, London, United Kingdom, 13-16
July, 1987, edited by Sharon Cather, 1–12. London: The Getty Conservation Institute.
Rainer, Leslie, Kiernan Graves, Shin Maekawa, Mark Gittins, and Francesca Piqué. 2017. Conservation
of the Architectural Surfaces in the Tablinum of the House of the Bicentenary, Herculaneum:
Phase 1, Examination, Investigations, and Condition Assessment. Los Angeles: The Getty
Conservation Institute.
Rickerby, Stephen, Lisa Shekede, Fan Zaixuan, Tang Wei, Qiao H ai andYang Jinjian. 2004.
"Implementation of Grouting and Salts-Reduction Treatments of Cave 85 Wall Paintings." In
Conservation of Ancient Sites on the Silk Road: Proceedings of the Second International
Conference on the Conservation of Grotto Sites, Mogao Grottoes, Dunhuang, People’s Republic of
China, June 28–July 3, 2004, edited by Neville Agnew, 480–487. Los Angeles: The Getty
Conservation Institute.
Rickerby, Stephen, Lisa Shekede, Fan Zaixuan, Tang Wei, Qiao Hai, Yang Jinjian and Francesca Piqué.
2004. "Development and Testing of the Grouting and Soluble-Slats Reduction Treatments of
Cave 85 Wall Painting." In Conservation of Ancient Sites on the Silk Road: Proceedings of the
Second International Conference on the Conservation of Grotto Sites, Mogao Grottoes,
P A G E | 85
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Dunhuang, People’s Republic of China, June 28–July 3, 2004, edited by Neville Agnew, 471–479.
Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
Ruiz-Agudo, E., M. Kowacz, C.V. Putnis, and A. Putnis. 2010. "The Role of Background Electrolytes on
the Kinetics and Mechanism of Calcite Dissolution."Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 74 (4):
1256-1267.
Sfarra, S., C. Ibarra-Castanedo, D. Ambrosini, D. Paoletti, A. Bendada, and X. Maldague. 2014. "Non-
Destructive Testing Techniques to Help the Restoration of Frescoes." Arabian Journal for
Science and Engineering 39 (5): 3461–3480.
Stambolov, T., and J.R.J. van Asperen de Boer. 1976. The Deterioration and Conservation of Porous
Building Materials in Monuments: A Review of the Literature. Rome: ICCROM, International
Centre for the Study of the Preservation and the Restoration of Cultural Property.
Stockwell Berriman, James Robert. 2004. "The Application of Air-Coupled Ultrasonic Systems and
Signal Processing to the Interrogation of Concrete." Ph.D dissertation in Engineering,
University of Warwick.
Suneson, Carola. 2001. "Hydraulic Lime Based Injectable Mortars." In Conservation of Mural Paintings,
edited by Ulf Lindborg, 39–44. Stockholm: National Heritage Board.
The Foundation for the Conservation of Contemporary Art (SBMK). 1999. The Decision-Making Model
for the Conservation and Restoration of Modern and Contemporary Art.
Tornari, V., E. Bernikola, E. Tsiranidou, K. Hatzigiannakis, M. Andrianakis, V. Detalle, and J.L. Bodnar.
2013. "Micro-Mapping of Defect Structural Micro-Morphology in the Documentation of Fresco
Wall Paintings." International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 2 (1): 1–22.
Torraca, Giorgio. 2005. Porous Building Materials: Materials Science for Architectural Conservation. 4th
edition. Rome: ICCROM, International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and the
Restoration of Cultural Property.
Torraca, Giorgio. 2009. Lectures on Materials Science for Architectural Conservation. Los Angeles: The
Getty Conservation Institute.
Tringham, Sibylla, Charlotte Martine de Fonjaudran, Sharon Cather, and Cynthia de Giorgio. 2013.
"Passive and remedial approaches to salt damage and biodeterioration of wall paintings and
monuments in the Crypt of the Grand Masters, St. John's Co-Cathedral, Valletta." In
Wandmalereien in Krypten, Grotten, Katakomben: Zur Konservierung Gefasster Oberflächen in
Umweltgeschädigten Räumen ; Symposium, Germain National Committee of ICOMOS,
Quedlinburg, Germany, 3-6 November, 2011, edited by Thomas Danzl, Matthias Exner, Ralph-
Günther Patocka, Elisabeth Rüber-Schütte, Uwe Steinecke, and John Ziesemer, 85–96.
Quedlinburg: ICOMOS.
Turk, Janez, Alenka Mauko Pranjić, Andrew Hursthouse, Robert Turner, and John J. Hughes. 2019.
"Decision Support Criteria and the Development of a Decision Support Tool for the Selection
of Conservation Materials for the Built Cultural Heritage." Journal of Cultural Heritage 37: 44–
53.
P A G E | 86
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Waller, Robert. 1994. "Conservation Risk Assessment: A Strategy for Managing Resources for
Preventive Conservation." Studies in Conservation 39 (sup2): 12–16.
Wang, Wanfu. 2011. "Detection of Delamination in Wall Paintings by Ground Penetrating Radar." In
Behaviour of Electromagnetic Waves in Different Media and Structures, edited by Prof. Ali
Akdagli, 121–140. InTechOpen .
Wong, Lori, and Neville Agnew. 2013. The Conservation of Cave 85 at the Mogao Grottoes, Dunhuang: A
Collaborative Project of the Getty Conservation Institute and the Dunhuang Academy. Los
Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
Wong, Lori, Stephen Rickerby, Amarilli Rava, A. Sharkawi, and Alaa El-din M. Sharkawi. 2012.
"Developing Approaches for Conserving Painted Plasters in the Royal Tombs of the Valley of
the Queens" In Proceedings of Terra 2012: 11th International Conference on the Study and
Conservation of Earthen Architetcure Heritage, Lima, Peru, 22-27 April, edited by Mariana
Correia, Pamela Jerome, Marcial Bondet, Maddalena Achenza, 1–14. Lisbon: Argumentum.
8.2. WEBSITE CONTENTS AND UNPUBLISHED DOCUMENTS
BibleGateway. N.d. “King James Version (KJV).”Accessed August 20, 2020.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Kings%2011%3A36&version=KJV
Crevecoeur, Robert. 2017. “ Schilderingen in de Mariakerk te Nisse: Nader Bekeken.
Crijns Bernice, Rutger Morelissen, and Jorien Duivenvoorden. 2020. “Mariakerk Nisse DRAFT Report.”
Dupa-grund: Fissativo consolidante a solvente per esterni. N.d. “Prodotti.” Accessed August 20, 2020.
https://www.caparol.it/prodotti/preparazioni-risanamenti-e-rasature-armate/fondi-a-
solvente-trasparenti/dupa-grund
Historic England. 2020. “ The Production of Wall Painting Conservation Documents: Practical
Information.” http://www.proyectopatrimonio.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Wall-
painting-conservation-documents.pdf
ICOMOS: International Council on Monuments and Sites. 2003. “ICOMOS Principles for the
Preservation and Conservation/Restoration of Wall Paintings.”
https://www.icomos.org/en/what-we-do/focus/179-articles-en-
francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/166-icomosprinciples-for-the-preservation-
and-conservationrestoration-of-wall-paintings
Kaszewski, Lucy. 2018. “Wall Paintings and Environment.”
https://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/wallpainting/wallpainting.html
Mariakerk Nisse: Protestant Congregation in Nisse. 2020. “Church Building, History.”
https://www.mariakerk-nisse.nl/de-kerk/historie/
Mariakerk Nisse: Protestant Congregation in Nisse. 2020. “Church Building, Exterior.”
https://www.mariakerk-nisse.nl/de-kerk/exterieur/
P A G E | 87
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Mariakerk Nisse: Protestant Congregation in Nisse. 2020. “Church Building, Interior.”
https://www.mariakerk-nisse.nl/de-kerk/interieur/
National Museum of Denmark. N.d. “Wall Paintings in Danish Churches: Assessment and
Recommendation.” Accessed August 20, 2020. https://en.natmus.dk/sales-and-
services/museum-services/wall-paintings-in-danish-churches/assessments-and-
recommendation/
Nefertari Tomb. N.d. “Conservation Process of the Wall Paintings.”
https://www.nefertaritomb.com/process
Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed (RCE), National Monuments Register. 2020. “Monument
number: 10008, Dorpsplein 49, 4443 AG in Nisse.”
https://monumentenregister.cultureelerfgoed.nl/monumenten/10008
TIS Climate/Humidity Table. N.d. Accessed August 16, 2020.
https://www.tis-gdv.de/tis_e/misc/klima-htm/
Wong, Lori, and Stephen Rickerby. 2013. “Conservation and Management of the Tomb of
Tutankhamen: Conservation Planning and Implementation.”
https://www.getty.edu/conservation/our_projects/field_projects/tut/planning.html
YouTube, Getty Conservation Institute. 2013. “Laser Speckle Interferometry for Conservation
Science.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDzMB27XVxQ
P A G E | 88
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
SUMMARY
Structural detachments in wall paintings: Causes, methods of identification and decision-
making – Case study of Maria Church, Nisse.
Valentina Gatto, University of Amsterdam, August 2020.
Detachments are physical decaying processes that gradually cause the loss of adhesion and cohesion
of heterogeneous layers in the structure of wall paintings. Consequently, the partial separation
between pictorial layers, plaster layers and their support is a phenomenon frequently affecting the
structure of murals. Common conservation approaches are based on the identification of areas of
delamination by means of subjective and empirical methods, such as the percussion approach. The
latter is based on the gentle tapping of the surface of the wall painting and the manual documentation
of the acoustic response generated. Successively, delaminated regions of the structure of murals are
consolidated by injecting a variety of adhesive mixtures. This procedure is frequently described in the
literature as an obvious treatment and very little justification and evaluation of the long-term effects
of such adhesives are provided.
Therefore, three main areas of research and related aim were determined: (I) a description of
potential causes associated with structural detachments is found in Chapter 3; (II) an evaluation of
traditional and modern methods of identification with an overview of associated advantages and
disadvantages is formulated in Chapter 4; (III) the need for developing a decision-making tool to
establish treatment needs for structural detachments is expressed in Chapter 5. Additionally, the case
study of the wall paintings in Maria Church exemplifies the need for investigating the aforementioned
areas of research; Chapter 6 elaborates the probable causes, methods of identification of structural
detachments and the possibility of implementing a prototype of decision-making model to determine
their treatments needs.
Generally, causes associated with structural delamination are induced by either internal or external
mechanical stresses. Their main causes are: (I) intrinsic causes related to inherent fault of materials;
(II) environmental factors, primarily associated with the presence of moisture and fluctuations of
relative humidity; (III) extrinsic causes related to human factors. Suitable and effective methods to
characterise delamination usually involve the implementation (often combined) of: IRT (Infrared
Thermography), ultrasonic techniques, GPR (Ground penetrating radar), THz Imaging (Terahertz
Imaging) and DSPI (Digital Speckle Pattern Interferometry). Lastly, the formulation of a prototype of
decision-making model to determine the need for treatment of delamination is outlined: its
effectiveness needs to be evaluated.
P A G E | 89
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
APPENDIX I: ICONOGRAPHY OF THE WALL PAINTINGS IN MARIA CHURCH
The detailed study and interpretation of the saints and symbols depicted on the wall paintings in Maria
Church is out the scope of this thesis. However, it was deemed necessary to include an introduction of
the main themes represented to provide further information regarding the historical and artistic
context of this fascinating church.
I.I. THE WALL PAINTINGS ON THE TRIUMPHAL ARCH
The wall paintings on the triumphal arch represent three scenes depicting the life of the Virgin Mary,
to whom the church is dedicated.
The Coronation of Mary is a popular religious theme expressed in Christian art since the twelfth
century (González 2013, 4). In Maria Church, this subject is represented on the centre of the triumphal
arch (Fig.2.6, 2.7); here two figures are portrayed standing on a black and white chequered tile floor,
the only pictorial component preserved able to convey spatial suggestion and perspective. The two
figures are respectively: Mary, depicted on the left side wearing a red robe, a pink undergarment and
a crown, and God the Father represented with an adorned yellow brocade dress and two crowns, one
on his head and Mary’s crown, held by his hand. Jesus Christ was assumingly part of this composition
and was originally painted on the lap of his mother, Mary. Furthermore, two other elements are
depicted: a peculiar harp is discernible on the left of Mary whereas the remnants of a red stick with a
yellow flag and a red pennant can be seen on the right side of God. The composition is framed within
two pink pillars on either sides and a pink and yellow stripe with stylised plant motives on the top.
The lower right side of the triumphal arch exhibits another recurrent artistic Christian subject; the
announcement by the Archangel Gabriel to the Virgin Mary of the conception and further incarnation
of Jesus (Fig.2.8). In the church, this theme is portrayed by Mary and the Archangel Gabriel painted
next to each other in a seemingly simple room. The latter is exemplified by the presence of a small
stained glass window on the left. A few letters can be distinguished around the shoulder of the
Archangel Gabriel; a,i, and either a T or an F. Spatial suggestion is furthermore enhanced by the
presence of a red and white chequered floor.
The last theme represented within the arch is located on the lower left side. Here the Tree of Jesse, the
schematic representation of the ancestors of Jesus, can be observed (Fig.2.9). A total of eight figures
are depicted surrounded by flowers, leaves and branches, therefore forming a tree-like composition,
showing some of Mary’s descendants. The first figure visible at the bottom of the tree is Jesse of
Bethlem, now hardly recognisable, followed by his son, King David, who is portrayed as a bearded
youth wearing a crown, a red cloak and holding a harp. His name is written on a nameplate to the right
of his head and it is currently still visible. The composition terminates with the representation of Mary,
P A G E | 90
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
the last descendant of David. Mary is represented wearing a red dress, holding Jesus Christ, within a
pointed oval shape, made of branches and leaves. Special pictorial elements of this wall paintings are
the burning candles, painted next to several figures of the tree; their symbolic meaning is potentially
related to a biblical passage (1 Kings,11:36, from the King James version) which states as follow: “and
unto his son will I give one tribe, that David my servant may have a light always before me in
Jerusalem, the city which I have chosen me to put my name there (BibleGateway n.d.).”
I.II. THE WALL PAINTING ON THE NORTH WALL A wall painting depicting Saint Christopher, patron saint of travellers and pilgrims, can be seen on the
left side of the main entrance (Fig. 2.10). The location of this is tightly connected to the significance of
this saint; worshippers could appreciate viewing a representation of the martyr responsible for the
protection of pilgrims the moment they entered the church. In Maria Church, the saint is depicted
standing nearby a river. On the background, two rows of palm trees and a building with a round dome
are visible. A hermit is painted exiting the this building, wrapped in a yellow cloak, admiring the
gesture of the martyr whilst he crosses the river carrying the infant Jesus Christ on his right shoulder,
now almost entirely disappeared. Saint Christopher is portrayed wearing a red dress, a turban
wrapped around his curly hair and a golden-yellow beard. The martyr is holding a tree trunk with
both hands, while his head is leaned over his shoulder and slightly turned to the right, to look at the
infant Jesus Christ.
P A G E | 91
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
APPENDIX II: LOCAL NEWSPAPER ‘PROVINCIALE ZEEUWSE COURANT’
Fig. I.I: Local newspaper ‘Provinciale Zeeuwse Courant’, issued on December 9th, 1986.
P A G E | 92
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Fig. I.II: Local newspaper ‘Provinciale Zeeuwse Courant’, issued on November 4th, 1986.
P A G E | 93
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
APPENDIX III: HISTORY AND RESTORATION HISTORY OF MARIA CHURCH
The following information were gathered during the RCE investigation in 2019, and are the outcome
of an archival research. They are here included and summarised in Table II, to provide a further
description of the history and previous restorations of Maria Church and its wall paintings.
Table II. History and Restoration History of Maria Church
Year Event Source
2nd half of the 15th
century
Potential date of execution of the wall
paintings commissioned by the Lord of
Borssele
De Ruiter 1987: 26
2nd half of the 16th
century
Potential date of lime-washing of the
wall paintings because of the
Reformation (first minister appointed in
Nisse on December 1, 1578)
De Ruiter 1987: 41
Before 1920
Water infiltration on the north wall,
behind and on the roof of the wall
painting of St. Christopher;
Further water leakage above wall
paintings on triumphal arch, loss of
paint, cracks
Por 1920: 1
Post 1984: 2
Por 1920: 2
1920 Paintings uncovered by restorer Jacob
Por Por 1920: 1
1920
Restoration of paintings by Jacob Por
Work (inter alia):
St. Christopher:
• Removal of whitewash that covered
the painting
• Restoration of northern wall from
outside
• Fillings on yellow band at the bottom
• Entire painting "treated and
preserved"
• Fillings, retouches
Triumphal arch:
• Renovation of column
• Wall paintings "treated and preserved
as a fragment"
Por 1920: 1-3
Post 1984: 2
Before 1984 Metal hanging system for curtains
installed for triumphal arch paintings
RCE photos 252,044, 252,045
RCE Image library
P A G E | 94
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Between 1984 and
1986 Removal of hanging system
RCE photo 296,905, 262,955
RCE Image bank
1984-86
Restoration of paintings by John Post:
St. Christopher (based on a
restoration plan):
• Injection glue ("Korrekor van Tollens")
• Clean with 95% alcohol prior to
injection
• Fixing original paint and retouches
(with “Dupa-Grund from Caparol”)
• Removal of covering lime and stucco
• Retouches (with “ETA paint from
Talens” or Keimverf)
• Replace of previous cement
restorations
• Cleaning (80% acetic acid in distilled
water)
Both paintings:
• 6 month restoration project
• "Hundreds of thousands" of holes
drilled for injection
• Use of electric drill and injection
needle with 2-component adhesive
Post 1984
Provinciale Zeeuwse Courant
December 9, 1986
Provinciale Zeeuwse Courant
November 4, 1986
2009
"However, the condition of these
paintings [on the north face and
triumphal arch] leaves something to be
desired" W.H.P. Scholten
Mail exchange W.H.P. Scholten
(Stichting Cultureel Erfgoed
Zeeland) and M. Polman
(Specialist color and paintings,
RCE)
2010 Restoration exterior and tower
Mail exchange Renate Pekaar
(Regional Consultant
Architecture, RCE) and M.
Polman
(Specialist color and paintings,
RCE)
2011 Restoration roof
Church website,
https://www.mariakerk-
nisse.nl/de-kerk/historie/
2012-2013 Restoration interior choir church and
ceiling
Church website,
https://www.mariakerk-
nisse.nl/de-kerk/historie/
P A G E | 95
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Before 2017
Placement of Plexiglas separation
between the choir church and the nave
(probably during 2012-2013
restoration);
Instability of the plaster layers were
observed and reported
Crèvecoeur 2017: 2
2017
Condition assessment and injection
grout tests.
Observations regarding condition:
Triumphal arch:
• Many detached areas
• "Quite thick and glossy fixative layer
[...] that never seemed interrupted"
• No injection holes were observed
• Small cracks “with fixative coverage”
• Large, open, older crack starting to the
right of the middle at the vault
• Bat debris in the middle above the arch
• "Very large tratteggio retouchings that
over the entire painting"
St. Christoffel:
• Full of injection holes
• Severely retouched with tratteggio
technique
• Deposition of dirt at the top
• Presence of detachments, but less than
triumphal arch painting
Injection grout tests (i.s.m.
restoration painter of the Fa. Franse,
Kwadendamme):
• Bottom right triumphal arch with 40
cm diameter
• Drilled 2 mm holes at a distance of 10-
15 cm
• Injection 1: 1 ethanol: water mixture
• Injection of thickened Plextol B500
with 5% toluene
Cleaning tests and sampling fixer
layer:
• Tests with ethanol and acetone with
cotton swabs
Crèvecoeur 2017: 2-5
Crèvecoeur 2017: 2-5
Crèvecoeur 2017: 8
Crèvecoeur 2017: 5-7
Crèvecoeur 2017: 4
P A G E | 96
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
• Sample of fixative layer to analyse for
composition that may show whether
there are long-term concerns, for
example with regard to yellowing or
becoming insoluble
P A G E | 97
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
APPENDIX IV: SEM-EDX OF SAMPLES NO 1,2 AND 3
The following samples were taken by Jorien Duivenvoorden and analysed by means of SEM-EDX by Luc Megens in the RCE laboratories in the Ateliergebouw,
Amsterdam. Pictures of the SEM-EDX analysis and their interpretations are hereby included to provide a better understand of the material composition and
layer archaeology of the wall paintings in Maria Church, Nisse.
Nummer Overzicht Beschrijving locatie Monster 1
Pleisterschol rank rechts van Annunciatie Naamgeving
2019-205-1
Datum monstername 22 november 2019
Locatie monstername Mariakerk Nisse
Datum analyse 12 december 2019
Microscopie los monster Voorkant Achterkant Observaties
• 2-3 dunne pleisterlagen • Rode en donkere inclusies • Witte, glimmende inclusies
P A G E | 98
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Microscopie dwarsdoorsnede 2019-205-1
50x VIS 500x UV Observaties
• Twee lagen • Blauwe deeltjes (30
m), glasachtig Smalt? • Rode en gelige deeltjes
Okers? • Biologische structuur
(sterke luminiscentie onder UV) (70 m) met zeshoekige cellen en oranje materiaal erin Hout, plant?
• Doorzichtig deeltje (met felrode luminiscentie onder UV) (5 m) Meerkrap? Organische kleurstof?
Elektronenmicroscopie 65x 330x Observaties
• Twee lagen zichtbaar • Oranje deeltje (a) hoge
dichtheid • Celstructuur (b) lage
dichtheid
P A G E | 99
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
SEM-EDX metingen 2019-205-1
Uitwerking metingen Interpretatie Uitwerking metingen Interpretatie
Area 1: Ca, Si, (Mg) Point 2: Ca, Fe, (Na, Si, S, Cl) Area 3: Ca, Si, (Na, Al, S, Cl) Area 4: Ca, Si, (Mg, S) Point 5: Si, (Ca, Na) Point 6: Si, Ca, (Mg, Fe, Na, Al, K) Point 7: Si, Fe, Al, K, Ca, (Mg, Na) Point 8: Ca, Si, (Mg, K) Point 9: Ca, Si
• IJzer in rode/gelige plekken • Sporen van Mg, Cl, Na, S
Zouten • Calcium overal aanwezig • Silicium overal in kleine
mate aanwezig • Punt 5 is waarschijnlijk een
kwartsdeeltje
Area 1: Ca, (Mg, Al, Si, S, Cl) Area 2: C, Ca, (Si, S, K) Point 3: Al, (S, Ca) Point 4: Ca, (Si, S)
• Aluminium in felrood luminscerend deeltje Organische kleurstof
• Zeshoekig cellulaire structuur is organisch
Conclusies monster 1 Twee dunne lagen kalkpleister die elementen van veelvoorkomende zouten, kwartsdeeltjes (zandkorrels) en waarschijnlijk een plantaardig vezel bevatten. Ook zijn er sporen van waarschijnlijk okerpigmenten in dit monster gevonden.
P A G E | 100
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Nummer Overzicht Beschrijving locatie Monster 4
Stopsel boven de annunciatie
Naamgeving 2019-205-4
Datum monstername
22 november 2019
Locatie monstername Mariakerk Nisse
Datum analyse 12 december 2019
Microscopie los monster Foto 1 Foto 2 Observaties
• Hard materiaal, monster was lastig te nemen
• Fijn, wit poeder • Donkere, glimmende
inclusies (100 m)
P A G E | 101
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Elektronenmicroscopie 2019-205-4 75x Observaties
• Ruw oppervlak omgeven door fijner oppervlak met een hogere dichtheid
SEM-EDX metingen Uitwerking metingen Interpretatie Conclusies monster 4
Area 1: Ca, S, (Si) Area 2: Ca, (Mg, Si, S, Cl, K) Area 3: Ca, (Na, Mg, Al, Si, S, K) Point 4: S, Ca, (Mg) Point 5: Si, Ca, (Al) Area 6: Ca, S, (Na, Mg, Al, Si)
• Calcium en zwavel zijn meest voorkomend
• Stopsels bestaat daarom waarschijnlijk uit gips (calcium sulfaat)
• Ook andere elementen van veelvoorkomende zouten zijn aanwezig
Stopsel is hoogstwaarschijnlijk gemaakt van gips. Dit komt overeen met het witte, gladde uiterlijk van de stopsels. Echter, gips is een zacht materiaal en het stopsel was erg hard. Het zou kunnen dat het stopsel is gemaakt van een mengsel van gips en een lijm. Een lijm is lastig te ontdekken met SEM-EDX. Ook zijn er elementen van veelvoorkomende zouten aanwezig in dit monster.
P A G E | 102
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Nummer Overzicht Beschrijving locatie Monster 5
Fixatief rechts van God de Vader
Naamgeving 2019-205-3
Datum monstername
22 november 2019
Locatie monstername Mariakerk Nisse
Datum analyse 12 december 2019
Microscopie los monster Foto 1 Foto 2 Observaties
• Glimmende, gladde laag met geel/oranje kleur op witte pleisterlaag
P A G E | 103
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Elektronenmicroscopie 2019-205-5
75x 150x Observaties
• Twee lagen • (a) fijn oppervlak met
kleine deeltjes erop • (b) ruwer oppervlak • Laag (a) lijkt onder laag
(b) te zitten
SEM-EDX metingen Uitwerking metingen Interpretatie Conclusies monster 5
Area 1: C, O, (Al, Si, S, Ca) Area 2: C, O, (F, Na, Mg, Al, Si, C, Cl, Ca) Area 3: Ca, (Na, Mg, Al, Si, S, Cl) Point 4: Ca, (F, Na, Mg, Al, Si, S, Cl, K) Point 5: -
• Materiaal (a) is een organisch materiaal
• Dat komt overeen met het vermoeden dat het een kunsthars is
• Materiaal (b) is kalkpleister
• Elementen van veelvoorkomende zouten zijn aanwezig op het fixatief en in de pleisterlaag
De SEM-EDX metingen bevestigen dat het fixatief een organisch materiaal is. Bovendien zijn er elementen van veelvoorkomende zouten op het flintertje fixatief aanwezig, wat duidt op een problematische combinatie van een afsluitende coating en een zoutprobleem.
P A G E | 104
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
APPENDIX V: INTRODUCTION TO COMPOSITE MATERIALS IN WALL PAINTINGS
A brief description of the different materials historically used for the structural realisation of wall
paintings is included with the aim of achieving a better understanding of the formation process of
structural detachments.
Historically, the main constituent materials involved during the formation of structural foundations
of wall paintings were: clay, gypsum and lime (as binding agents) mixed with aggregates such as sand
of different granulometries, pozzolanic ash (or similar volcanic ashes), marble dust and different
vegetable or animal fibres. Generally, several applications of mixtures of the desirable binder and
aggregates, often starting with a low binder to aggregate ratio, were required to create a flat surface
suitable for the application of paint. Despite the enormous variety of techniques and material
combinations in use in different countries throughout history, the main artistic process diffused in the
West originated from the fresco technique (Mora, Mora and Philippot 1999, 116). The latter involved
the preparation of a structural support with different applications of lime, sand and marble dust at
varying ratios. Whilst this painting process reached its maximum expression in Greece, Italy and other
southern countries, the structural composition typical of frescoes can also be observed in wall
paintings executed with the secco painting technique.
Therefore, the preparation of a typical lime-based structural support for wall paintings consists in the
following three steps: (I) one layer of rough mortar called rinzaffo, composed of lime and sand of big
granulometry at a ratio of 3:1 applied directly over the wet bricks; (II) a denser layer called the
arriccio, where the sinopia, or preparatory drawing was usually executed, consisting of a mixture of
lime and sand of medium granulometry at a varying ratio of either 3:1 or 2:1; (III) finally the smooth
layer, the intonachino, often involving an even mixture of lime and very fine sand and/or marble dust
(Calicchia and Cannelli 2005, 116; Cennino Cennini 1940, 215). The lack of one or more of these
structural layers and variations in their thickness can be observed and can be correlated to the artist’s
background, purpose, and material availability, whilst composing the structure of the wall painting.
As elaborated in the introduction of this thesis, the main focus of this research is framed around the
understanding of the formation process of delamination in lime-based wall paintings. Hence, a
description of the cycle of formation of lime is considered essential to obtain an holistic
comprehension of potential damages affecting lime-based materials. Lime is a binding material
frequently found in architectural elements produced by the initial burning of limestone (Torraca
2009, 50). The manufacture of lime involves three steps: (I) calcination, or firing of the limestone,
where this is usually submitted to elevated heath (above 700 C) to allow the decomposition of
calcium carbonated and the formation of a paste-like material referred to as quicklime; (II) slaking,
P A G E | 105
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
the process of submersion of quicklime paste in water, to create a smooth white lime-paste that mainly
contains calcium hydroxide, water and little calcium carbonate; (III) carbonation, the final process in
which the slaked lime or lime-paste is hardened by reacting with carbon dioxide present in the air and
is transformed back into calcium carbonate (Fig.V.I) (Torraca 2009, 51-53). The final step usually
involve a reduction in volume, which can be counteracted by the addition of the right proportional
amount of sand. Moreover, the presence of impurities in the limestone used in the firing process can
reduce the plasticity of the lime-paste formed during slaking and the ultimate failure of mortar
(Torraca 2009, 52).
Fig. V.I: The cycle of formation of lime involves three steps: firing, slaking and carbonation. Lime is formed by the firing
of limestone and is eventually transformed back into calcium carbonate by the final reaction of calcium hydroxide with
carbon dioxide in the air.
P A G E | 106
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
APPENDIX VI: MOISTURE PASSAGE THROUGH POROUS BUILDING MATERIALS
Moisture in buildings is regarded as the main cause of degradation of wall paintings. The majority of
materials involved in the traditional construction of murals are porous and hydrophilic, hence their
direct susceptibility to moisture induced damage (Torraca 2009, 81). Generally, moisture is
considered a fundamental trigger of secondary reactions leading to the disintegration of both
structure and pictorial surface of wall paintings: its presence activates a sequence of physical and
chemical reactions which would simply not take place otherwise (Mora, Mora and Philippot 1999,
174). Therefore, since all chemical reactions damaging wall paintings need moisture, the identification
of its provenance and subsequent removal should be primary interventions.
The passage of moisture through building materials occurs due to their hydrophilic and polar natures.
The phenomenon of distribution of moisture through building materials is referred to as capillary
suction (Torraca 2005, 8). This force is indirectly correlated to the size of the pores in which moisture
is passing through: the smaller the diameter of the pore, the stronger the suction force. In this
circumstance, the average pore diameter is between 0.1 and 1 m and, as a result, the attraction of
water molecules to the walls of the pore is stronger than the attraction between water molecules.
Because of this, capillary rise in building materials with small pores can reach the height of many
metres (Torraca 2009, 82).
It is important to denote two fundamental concepts: (I) moisture is distributed within a porous
medium thus to reach the lowest energy state, which is achieved by reaching both an equilibrium of
the attraction forces between water molecules and building materials and a balance between the
amount of moisture uptake and subsequent evaporation; (II) the physical and chemical deterioration
of building materials induced by moisture is directly related to the pore size and pore distribution
within the material (Torraca 2009, 82). In conclusion, the most frequent way in which moisture is
distributed within building materials is the one that favours the equilibrium of attractions between
these elements. This is achieved in the following way: (I) only small pores (with diameter between 0.1
and 1 m) are completely filled with water and the nearby large pores (with diameter larger than 10
m) are dry; (II) small pores are completely filled, hence, water flows to the large pores where it is
only adhered to the surface and air fills most of the internal volume; (III) both small and large pores
are completely filled with water (Torraca 2005, 9- 11).
The movement of moisture within building materials can occur both in its liquid and gaseous phase
and is determined by several types of forces (Torraca 2005, 11). Table VI.I and VI.II summarise the
mechanisms responsible for the movement of moisture in both liquid and gaseous phase respectively,
as described by Torraca (2005, 11-15).
P A G E | 107
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
Table VI.I Forces responsible for the movement of moisture in the liquid phase
Table VI.II Forces responsible for the movement of moisture in the gaseous phase
Type of force Description
Suction
Movement from a region in which water is occupying all small pores and only
adhering to the surface of the large ones to a dry (or drier) region. Air is
removed from the dry material so that water can occupy the vacant space.
Diffusion The natural movement of water from a region with higher water content to one
with lower water content.
Osmosis
This force occurs when salts are dissolved in water and are dissociated into ions.
These ions attract water molecules due to their electrical charge and
consequently, water moves from regions of low ionic concentration to regions of
high ionic concentration.
Heat The movement of water from warmer regions to colder ones.
Type of force Description
Condensation
If the surface temperature is below the dew point of the surrounding air,
water vapour in the air is released in form of water droplets on the surface
itself. The liquid water can then move within the porous system by one of the
mechanisms described (see Table VI.I).
Vapour diffusion
Water can move from regions with high vapour pressure (many water
molecules in gaseous form in the air) to regions with lower vapour pressure
(fewer water molecules in gaseous form in the air). This can generate the
evaporation of water from surfaces nearby air with high vapour pressure and
the condensation on surfaces nearby air with low vapour pressure.
Hygroscopicity
Also defined as ‘hygroscopic adsorption’, this describes the attraction
between hydrophilic materials and water molecules. This is strongly
influenced by the relative humidity: for instance, at RH below 100%, small
pores endure hygroscopic adsorption and can fill up with water.
Furthermore, soluble salts can adsorb water molecules from the atmosphere
at RH below 100%. For example, sodium chloride can adsorb water from the
air at RH above 75%.
Evaporation
This can occur on wet surfaces due to the presence of RH below 100% or
when the air is continuously moving, transporting water molecules away
once in gaseous phase.
Desorption
The release of water molecules due to low RH and air circulation. Desorption
always occurs at RH lower than the lowest RH at which adsorption is
possible. For example, sodium chloride can adsorb water at 75% RH but only
starts releasing it below 70% RH.
P A G E | 108
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
The presence and passage of moisture through architectural elements can be classified according to
its origin: (I) rainwater affecting the outer building structure; (II) capillary rise due to rising damp
from the ground; (III) condensation on cold surfaces (below dew point temperature of the air); (IV)
diffusion of water induced by hygroscopic materials; (V) water vapours deriving from the ground
(Mora 1974, 38-43).
In conclusion, the identification of the source of moisture affecting building materials can be extremely
difficult and complex as this can be originating from different mechanisms occurring simultaneously.
Environmental monitoring is an essential component of the diagnostic investigation of historic
interiors and buildings and its main goal is the identification and documentation of sources of
moisture and their correlation to temperature parameters and outer environmental conditions.
P A G E | 109
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
APPENDIX VII: QUESTIONS OF THE PROTOTYPE OF DECISION-MAKING MODEL
1. Conservation history
1.1. Documentation of previous conservation treatments:
1.1.1. Conservation phase executed in (year/s) by (name of conservator/s or company)
1.1.2. Report description of previous condition of the wall painting. Include archival photos and
original documents here.
1.1.3. Based on these initial observations and current condition of the wall painting how would you
describe its progress of decay?
1.1.4. Short summary of all investigation/research:
1.1.5. Short summary of all tests:
1.1.6. Shor summary of all treatments (remedial, passive, preventive):
1.1.7. Description of adverse remedial treatments:
- Short description of adverse treatments
- What material/s was/were used? For what purpose? Include composition of such
material/s, msds sheet/s and manufacturer information.
- What damage do you think this material caused?
- How can this material be connected with the formation of structural delamination? I.e.
epoxy resin as protective coating → deflection of moisture passage → salts → internal
stress → mechanical and chemical failure → structural detachment
2. Identification of original/ previous conservation materials
2.1. Summary of description of composite materials and technique as found from archival research:
2.1.1. Structural materials: binder and aggregates
2.1.2. Pictorial material: binder, pigments, varnish, glaze etc.
2.2. Investigation of original materials
2.2.1. Dino-lite/microscopic photos and observations.
2.2.2. Decision-making for sample taking:
- How many samples do you need?
- Sample location (coordinates)
- Location description
- Purpose/ remark
2.3. Investigation of previous conservation materials
2.3.1. Dino-lite/microscopic photos and observations.
2.3.2. Decision-making for sample taking:
- How many samples do you need?
P A G E | 110
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
- Sample location (coordinates)
- Location description
- Purpose/ remark
2.4. Samples taken:
- Sample name/number
- Sample description before embedding
- Expected layer build-up and composition
- Embedding material
- Additional notes/remarks
2.4.1. Microscopic observations of sample
- Number of layers, thickness (m) and type (i.e. arriccio and intonaco)
- Description of each layer: particles and colour
- Visible light, raking light, UV pictures and observations
- Identification of materials: include analysis and images
- Notes/ remarks
2.5. Evaluation of re-treatability of previous conservation materials
2.5.1. Can previous adverse materials be removed? Can their removal be effectuated without risks
to the original materials?
2.5.2. What are the permeability/mechanical/chemical properties of adverse materials?
2.5.3. Based on these properties can you assess their compatibility with other conservation
materials?
3. Condition monitoring
A. Description of current condition
3.1. Based on which technique is delamination believed to affect the structure of this wall painting?
3.2. Where are delaminated areas believed to occur?
3.2.1. Is there an area/areas of the wall painting more heavily affected?
3.3. Where is the wall painting located within the church?
3.3.1. Is it integrated in a load-bearing wall?
3.3.2. Is the building support of the wall painting directly exposed to the outer environment?
3.4. How would you describe the overall state of preservation of the structure of the wall painting?
3.5. What damages are affecting the pictorial layer? Carry out a damage mapping at regular intervals.
Take regular pictures of damages on the same location of the painting. Include all files here.
- Cracks (describe size and location)
- Microcracks (describe size and location)
- Flaking paint (describe which area is more affected and which pigment/paint)
- Efflorescence/ Sub-efflorescence (if visible)
P A G E | 111
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
- Paint loss (describe size, location and amount of material missing i.e. paint loss including
painted surface, intonaco and part of the underlying layer/ paint loss revealing part of the
building support)
- Surface irregularities (describe the irregularity and location)
3.6. How would you describe overall state of preservation of the pictorial layer of the wall painting?
B. Documentation of environmental monitoring
3.7. Document the following parameters for each month for at least a year
- Internal air temperature (T, C): average min, daily mean, average max
- External air temperature (T, C): average min, daily mean, average max
- Internal relative humidity (RH %)
- External relative (RH %)
3.7.1. In presence of heating system report any change of air temperature (T, C) induced
3.8. Document the surface temperature of the wall painting with passive thermography
3.9. Document the changes induced by the heating system/other to the surface temperature of the
wall painting with passive thermography
3.9.1. Do you think condensation is occurring on the surface?
3.10. Document the building performance with passive thermography. Include pictures here.
3.10.1. What are the weak areas surrounding the wall paintings?
3.10.2. Is water leaking or has leaked in the past from these weak spots?
3.11. What damages are affecting the architectural elements surrounding the wall painting?
- Cracks (describe size and location)
- Microcracks (describe size and location)
- Efflorescence/ Sub-efflorescence (if visible)
- Delamination
- Sulphation
3.12. Based on results obtained by sheet 1,2 and 3, can you hypothesise causes of delamination?
4. Assessment of rate of change
A. Interpretation of results obtained during condition monitoring
4.1. Compare damage mapping and pictures of damages and describe observation
- Are there more damages occurring?
- Which ones?
4.2. Compare images obtained with passive thermography. What differences do you see?
4.3. How would you describe the environmental conditions of the church/building?
P A G E | 112
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
- Do you think RH and T are contributing factors to the decay process affecting the wall
painting? Specify which parameter should be addressed i.e. rising damp, condensation etc.
- Is RH and T affecting one particular damage?
B. Assessment of structural delamination
4.4. What is the most suitable technique?. Check the following parameters:
- Condition of the pictorial layer
- Surface topography
- Accessibility of the wall painting
- Budget
- In-situ logistics i.e. window in front of the mural, nearby source of vibrations, restricted
accessibility etc.
4.5. Once selected the most suitable technique/techniques this/these should be used at regular
intervals (at least twice in a year) to assess the progress of delamination. Document your
observations:
- Visually document delaminated areas and include photos here.
- Can delamination be quantified?
- Where in the layer archaeology is delamination occurring?
4.6. How would you describe the overall state of preservation of the structure of the wall painting
based on these results? Check difference with 1.4.
- Describe the severity by which the wall paintings is affected by delamination
- Describe the frequency by which the wall paintings is affected by delamination
4.7. How would you describe the progress of delamination?
- Create a customised table with severity and frequency (see Table 5.1).
4.8. Can you draw a parallel between delaminated areas and damages on the pictorial layer? Describe
this here, include pictures.
4.9. Based on the obtained results, can you confirm what stated regarding the causes of delamination
in 3.21?
P A G E | 113
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
APPENDIX VIII: GLOSSARY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY (AH): Mass of water vapour divided by the mass of dry air in a certain volume
at a specific temperature. It is expressed as grams of water vapour/moisture per cubic metre of air
(g/m3). For instance: the maximum AH of warm air at 30 C is approximately 30 g/m3, whilst the
maximum AH of cold air at 0 C is approximately 5 g/m3. Warmer air holds more water, whereas cold
air hols less.
ACTIVATION MECHANISMS: This term is used to indicate all those mechanisms responsible to
initiate deterioration. The presence of condensation on the surface of a wall painting is an activation
mechanism of several forms of decay; therefore the causes of such decays are to be found in the causes
of the formation of condensation, most likely fluctuation of RH and the presence of microclimates.
ARRICCIO: Italian term, used to indicate the second fundamental structural layer of fresco and lime-
based wall paintings. The sinopia, or preparatory drawing is usually executed on this layer which is
formed of a mixture of lime and sand of medium granulometry at a varying ratio of either 3:1 or 2:1.
ATTENUATION: The reduction of the amplitude of a signal, electric current or other oscillation within
a material, in this case, within the structure of a wall painting. During the implementation of non-
destructive techniques to documents the presence of delamination, lime-based structural rendering
can cause signal attenuation due to their heterogeneity.
BAT DROPPINGS: Otherwise known as guano, it indicates the accumulated presence of excrement
of bats. It contains exceptionally high contents of nitrogen, phosphate and potassium.
BUILDING SUPPORT: The supporting material of a building (bricks, concrete, wood etc.) where the
structure of a wall painting has been applied.
CEMENT: A binder used for construction that hardens and adhered to other structural materials to
bind them together. Cements used in construction is composed of a mixture of inorganic materials
such as lime, calcium silicate and aluminates and can be non-hydraulic (do not require the presence
of water to harden) and hydraulic (in need of water to set).
CLAY: Fine-grain natural soil material that contains hydrous aluminium phyllosilicates that develop
plasticity when wet and become hard and brittle once dry. The typical pores arrangement of clay is
describe as platy and compressed; water molecules can be easily trapped between these plates of clay
mineral, hence explaining its plasticity.
P A G E | 114
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
DECISION-MAKING MODEL: Series of questions, schemes and tables that need to be fill in to be able
to interpret complex results and information and possibly help the user to formulate a decision
regarding a specific topic.
DELIQUESCE: The process of change of phase of a water soluble solid to liquid by absorption of
moisture from the air. Soluble salts can often endure this mechanism in presence of high RH.
DEW POINT TEMPERATURE: Temperature the air needs to be cooled to achieve a RH of 100%. At
this point the air cannot hold more water vapour, therefore, if it was cooled even more (below the dew
point) water vapour would be released in the liquid form creating condensation or dew.
ELASTIC WAVE: A motion in a medium in which, when particles are displaced, a force proportional
to the displacements acts on these particles to restore them to their original position. For example: a
gas is an elastic medium and sound is transmitted through a gas as an elastic wave.
ELECTRIC FIELD: A region around a charged particles within which a force would be exerted on other
charged particles or objects.
ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE: Waves created by the interaction of an electric field and a magnetic field.
Electromagnetic waves are composed of oscillating magnetic and electric fields perpendicular to each
other. They can travel in a vacuum and, therefore, do not need a medium to travel through (as opposed
to acoustic waves). As a result their involvement in non-destructive techniques to document
delamination in wall paintings is advantageous.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS: Factors deriving from the environment that are deemed to cause decay
and damages to artefact, such as wall paintings. See 3.3.
EXTRINSIC FACTORS: Factors connected to both natural and human activities that are deemed to
cause decay and damages to artefact, such as wall paintings. These can include natural catastrophes
(earthquakes, tsunamis, storms etc.) and human activities that are considered adverse for the long-
term preservation of such artefacts (terrorism, vandalism, vibrations and adverse conservation
treatments). See 3.4.
FREQUENCY: In physics, it refers to the number of occurrences of a repeating event per unit of time.
It is measured in units of hertz (Hz) and 1 Hz equals to one occurrence of a repeating event per second.
This term is used in this thesis to described the different frequencies a wave can have.
P A G E | 115
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
FROST DAMAGE/FREEZE THAW: The development of ice crystals within building materials
facilitated by low temperatures. This can cause severe increase of internal stresses with the
consequent mechanical failure of lime renderings and the ultimate formation of delamination.
FUNDAMENTAL CAUSES OF DAMAGE: Main triggering factors of damages occurring in wall
paintings. When describing structural detachments, the main fundamental causes are the following:
(I) intrinsic; (II) environmental; (III) extrinsic. See Chapter 3.
GYPSUM: Soft mineral implemented in the structural composition of architectural surfaces and wall
paintings. It is composed of calcium sulphate dihydrate, CaSO4 .2H2O.
HeNe LASER: Helium- neon laser, which most commonly operates at a wavelength of 632.8 nm, in the
red part of the visible spectrum.
HOLOGRAPHY: A method of creating a three-dimension image of an object by recording the pattern
of interference formed by a split-laser beam and then illuminating this pattern with either a laser or
ordinary light. It measures not only the intensity, but also the phase information of the light recorded.
It is the fundamental operating mechanism behind the non-destructive technique referred to as: DSPI,
ESPI or TV Holography. See 4.4.
HYDROPHILIC: A molecule or portion of this, that can interact with water or other polar substances.
They are typically charged-polarised and capable of forming hydrogen bonding.
HYDROPHOBIC: A molecule or portion of this, that repel water or other polar substances and can
interact with oil or other non-polar substances. They are typically non-polar.
INFRARED RADIATION: Electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 700 nm to 1 mn.
These extends from the red edge of the visible spectrum and are, therefore, invisible to the human eye.
INJECTION GROUT: Bulked fluid material with adhesive properties injected through pre-drilled holes
in a wall painting to treat structural delamination. A variety of material combination, usually involving
a binder, a filler, a suspension medium and sometimes some additives (such as plasticisers, fluidisers
and retarders) together with a variety of commercially available products have been used to treat this
form of damage.
INTERFEROMETRY: A family of techniques in which waves, usually electromagnetic waves, are
superimposed, causing the phenomenon of interference. This is used in DSPI, ESPI or TV Holography:
two laser beams are split into two with one being used a reference beam and the other being reflected
P A G E | 116
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
by the wall painting. Once these are superimposed, their phase change is recorded and an interference
pattern is formed: this way the different optical path endured by the reference beam is documented
and is indicative of material inhomogeneities.
INTONACO/INTONACHINO: Italian term, used to indicate the last fundamental structural layer of
fresco and lime-based wall paintings. This layer often involve an even mixture of lime and very fine
sand and/or marble dust, to create a smooth surface optimal for the application of paint.
INTRINSIC/ INHERENT: Factors generating damages strictly connected to the origin and nature of
the artefact/ wall painting. In particular, faulty materials, defective techniques and the geological
composition of the ground of the building are elements considered to be directly responsible for the
formation of structural delamination. See 3.5.
LAYER ARCHAEOLOGY: The layered structure of a wall painting.
LIME: Term commonly used in the chemical language to indicate calcium oxide (CaO). However, it is
also used by architects and engineers to refer to a range of materials derived from calcium oxide that
can exhibit striking differences of mechanical and chemical properties. The correct use of the technical
names of lime materials is described below.
QUICKLIME: Calcium oxide, CaO.
LIME PUTTY: Calcium hydroxide + water, Ca(OH)2 + H2O
HYDRATED LIME: Calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)2.
HYDRAULIC LIME: Calcium silicate and aluminates + calcium hydroxide and/or calcium
oxide, Ca(OH)2 + C2S + C3S + CH and others.
LOSS OF ADHESION: Failure of adhesion from a bonding surface or between two adhered layers.
Structural delamination is caused by failure of the adhesive properties between different structural
layers of the wall paintings or between the binder (lime) and its aggregates (sand, fibres etc.).
LOSS OF COHESION: Failure of adhesive properties within particles of the same substance. Structural
delamination is caused by failure of the adhesive properties of the binder itself.
MAGNETIC FIELD: A region of space near a magnet, electric current, or moving charged particle in
which a magnetic force acts on any other magnet, electric current, or moving charged particle.
Nd:YAG LASER: Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser, which most commonly operates
at a wavelength of 532 nm, in the green part of the visible spectrum.
P A G E | 117
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
NON-DESTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUE: Wide groups of analysis and techniques used in science and
technology industry to evaluate the properties of a material without causing any irreversible
alteration.
PHASE DIFFERENCE: The difference in degrees (angle) or time of two sinusoidal waves with the same
frequency.
PIEZOELECTRIC TRANSDUCER/SENSOR: Device that generate or record electromagnetic and
ultrasound energy. These can be divided into three broad categories: transmitters, receivers and
transceivers. Transmitters convert electrical signals into ultrasonic or electromagnetic waves,
receivers convert ultrasonic or electromagnetic waves into electrical signal while transceivers can
execute both mechanism.
POROSITY: measure of the void spaces within the material. It is a fraction of the volume of the voids
over the total volume of the material and it is expressed as a percentage.
PVA RESIN: Polyvinyl acetate resin.
RELATIVE HUMIDITY: Ratio of the absolute humidity (AH) at a given time, compared to the
maximum amount of moisture that air can hold at a given temperature and pressure. It is expresses
as a percentage. For example: at 25 C and with an AH of 23 g/m3, the RH is 100%. This means that
the air is holding the maximum capacity of water vapour at that temperature. If the AH was 11.5 g/m3,
consequently the RH would have been 50 % (the air is holding half the amount of water vapour of its
maximum capacity at that temperature).
RINZAFFO: Italian term, used to indicate the first fundamental structural layer of fresco and lime-
based wall paintings. This layer of rough mortar is composed of lime and sand of big granulometry at
a ratio of 3:1 applied directly over the wet bricks/building support.
SECONDARY CAUSES: Decaying reactions spawned by the single or combined action of the main
causes. When describing structural detachments the secondary causes are the following: frost
damage, migration and re-crystallisation of soluble salts and fungi. See Chapter 3.
STRUCTURAL DETACHMENTS/DELAMINATION: Physical forms of damage induced by either
external or internal mechanical stresses. They are complex phenomena, considered among the most
frequent types of damage found in mural paintings. The most commonly observed types of
delamination can affect both structure and pictorial layer of a wall painting. Structural delamination,
detachment, defect or even disintegration are terminologies used to define damages involving: the
P A G E | 118
Gatto | UvA | 2020
Structural Detachments in Wall Paintings: Causes, Methods of Identification and Decision-Making.
loss of cohesion within the same structural layer, the loss of adhesion between two different layers
and the loss of adhesion between different applications of the same layer.
SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA: Property of solids defined as the ratio of the surface area of a material to
either its mass or apparent volume. Materials with rough surface texture have higher specific surface
area than materials with smooth surface topography.
SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY/TEXTURE/FINISH: The quality of a surface, in terms of its roughness,
microscopic pattern (lay) and macroscopic pattern (waviness).
WAVELENGTH: The distance between two successive crests of a wave, which may be electromagnetic,
ultrasonic or thermal. It is measured in units of lengths such as metres, centimetres, millimetres and
nanometres.
WELL-ROUNDED WELL-SORTED GRAINS: Pores with similar size and corners completely rounded.
Materials with these properties are generally porous, as opposed to poorly sorted sediments, which
have low porosity.