Post on 21-Feb-2023
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0023-6438/$30.0
doi:10.1016/j.lw
�CorrespondE-mail addr
LWT 40 (2007) 1146–1155
www.elsevier.com/locate/lwt
Polyphasic characterization of indigenous lactobacilli and lactococcifrom PDO Canestrato Pugliese cheese
Lucia Aquilanti�, Emanuele Zannini, Annalisa Zocchetti,Andrea Osimani, Francesca Clementi
Department of Food Science, Polytechnic University of Marche, via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
Received 5 April 2006; received in revised form 4 September 2006; accepted 5 September 2006
Abstract
A polyphasic approach, involving both genotypic and phenotypic analyses was used to characterize 33 isolates of lactic acid bacteria
from the raw milk Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) Canestrato Pugliese cheese, in order to select candidate strains that can be
used as autochthonous starter cultures in the dairy industry. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis and clustering by
the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) were used to evaluate the genotypic diversity, while phenotypic
characterization was performed through miniaturized assays and traditional biochemical tests. Technological properties of major interest
for cheese-making (acidification, tendency to lysis, proteolytic and peptidase activity) were also evaluated, and selected subset of data was
statistically examined by the one-way ANOVA and the Tukey–Kramer HSD test, to highlight strain-specific and species-specific
differences among the isolates. A high degree of diversity appeared in the phenotypic and technological traits in opposition to a relatively
low genotypic diversity. Although none of the isolates showed the best performances in all the activities, an appropriate mixture of
strains could be selected for providing an efficacious autochthonous starter culture.
r 2006 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: PDO Canestrato Pugliese cheese; Autochthonous lactic acid bacteria; Starter cultures
1. Introduction
Canestrato Pugliese is a Protected Designation of Origin(PDO) cheese (CEE Regulation 1107/96) that is producedin Southern Italy from whole ewe’s milk. Nowadays,it is mainly manufactured with pasteurized milk that isinoculated with starter cultures, although in some dairyfarms it is still produced from raw milk without theaddition of starters. In the latter case, the ripening processdepends entirely on the indigenous microbial populationsthat contaminated the raw milk and the curd during themilking and cheese-making. The traditional technologythat is applied for the production of Canestrato Pugliesecheese has been previously described (Albenzio et al.,2001). According to its designation as a PDO cheese (CEERegulation 2081/92), the peculiar characteristics of Canes-
0 r 2006 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Pu
t.2006.09.001
ing author. Tel.: +3971 2204985; fax: +39 71 2204858.
ess: l.aquilanti@univpm.it (L. Aquilanti).
trato Pugliese are strictly related to its production area,and particularly to the composition and diversity of theindigenous lactic acid bacteria (LAB) population, which ismainly responsible for the increase in the cheese flavourduring ripening (Steele & Unlu, 1992). The contribution ofthe indigenous LAB population to the biochemical andsensory characteristics of this PDO cheese, coupled to thehigh resistance to the selective conditions of the cheese-making (De Angelis et al., 2001) encourage the selection ofindigenous strains as new starter cultures for the dairyindustry. Accordingly, preservation of the genetic pool ofstrains that have developed in dairy environments that arenot yet affected by selected industrial cultures is of primaryimportance (Mannu & Paba, 2002). As selected startersconsist of either a single or a few well-characterized strains,the natural microbial population of raw milk cheeses isgenerally much more complex.To date, several genotypic and phenotypic methods have
been developed for the characterization of LAB strains
blished by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Aquilanti et al. / LWT 40 (2007) 1146–1155 1147
from dairy products. Randomly amplified polymorphicDNA (RAPD) analysis is a PCR-based method that iswidely used for estimation of the genotypic diversityamong Lactobacillus and Lactococcus strains (Du Plessis& Dicks, 1995), and it provides good levels of discrimina-tion while being applicable to a large number of cultures.However, a comprehensive characterization of thesemicroorganisms cannot ignore the evaluation of some oftheir phenotypic and technological traits (Vandamme et al.,1996), like the fermentation pattern, the acidifying andpeptidase activities, the proteolysis and tendency to lysis.Evaluation of these last traits is particularly important forthe selection of new starter strains, which should be able totransform the principal components of the curd into moresimple substances, either as well-defined cellular entities orthrough the released enzymes.
In the present study, a polyphasic approach for thegenotypic and phenotypic characterization of 33 auto-chthonous LAB isolates from starter-free CanestratoPugliese cheese was developed. Molecular typing by RAPDanalysis, phenotypical and technological tests allowed aneffective strain differentiation to be achieved, enhancingthe sensitivity of each device used and leading to theindividuation of strains that will be potentially utilized asstarter cultures in the dairy industry.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Reference strains
Nine strains from international culture collections wereused as references: Lactobacillus brevis DSM20054,DSM20556, DSM2647, DSM1267; Lactobacillus casei
DSM20011; Lactobacillus plantarum DSM20174,DSM2601; Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris DSM20069,DSM20388; Lb. casei NCIMB4114 and ATCC11578. Theywere purchased from (i) the ‘Deutsche Sammlung vonMikrorganismen und Zellkulturen’ (DSMZ, Braunsch-weig, Germany, http://www.dsmz.de/); (ii) the ‘AmericanType Culture Collection’ (ATCC, Manassas, USA, http://www.atcc.org/); (iii) the ‘National Collections of Industrialand Marine Bacteria’ (NCIMB, Aberdeen, Scotland,United Kingdom, www.ncimb.co.uk/).
2.2. Isolation and identification
The isolates were collected and identified as previouslydescribed by Aquilanti, Dell’Aquila, Zannini, Zocchetti,and Clementi (2006).
2.3. RAPD analysis
Bacterial cells were grown overnight at 30 1C in 5mlMRS broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). Bacterial DNA wasrecovered following the phenol–chloroform extractionmethod described by de Los Reyes-Gavillan, Limsowtin,Tailliez, Sechaud, and Accolas (1992). The amplifications
were performed in 25 ml reaction volume, containing10mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 50mM KCl, 200 mM of eachdATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP, 3mM MgCl2, 1 mMprimer, 80 ng DNA and 2U Taq DNA polymerase(Finnzymes Oy, Keilaniemi, Finland). The PCR reactionswere carried out in a Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (PerkinElmerApplied Biosystem, Foster City, CA) using a 10-merprimer (50AGC AGC GTG G 30) (Cocconcelli, Porro,Galandini, & Senini, 1995), under the following conditions:initial denaturation at 94 1C for 2min, followed by 35cycles of denaturation at 94 1C for 1min, annealing at42 1C for 1min, elongation at 72 1C for 90 s, and a finalelongation step at 72 1C for 10min. The PCR productswere separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% (w/v) agarosegels in TBE (Tris–borate–EDTA [pH 8]) buffer. A 50-bpDNA molecular mass marker (Amersham Pharmacia,Uppsala, Sweden) was used as the size standard. TheDNA fragments were stained with ethidium bromide andviewed under UV light, at 254 nm. Electronic images of thegels were visualized by means of an ImageMaster VDS(Amersham Pharmacia), with capturing through theLISCAP 1.0 program (Amersham Pharmacia), and storedas TIFF files. The reproducibility of the RAPD profileswas tested by replicates in triplicate of all of the referencestrains. The band patterns were normalized and furtherprocessed with the GelCompar 4.0 software (AppliedMaths, Kortrijk, Belgium). Cluster analysis was performedby using the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice, 1945) and theunweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages(UPGMA) (Sokal & Michener, 1958), with the 1.8 NTSYSsoftware (Rohlf, 1993). An 80% similarity was arbitrarilyselected as a threshold for the definition of the homo-geneous RAPD-based clusters.
2.4. Phenotypic characterization
The cultures were propagated in modified APTbroth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, USA) with a16-h-incubation at 30 1C for lactococci and 37 1C forlactobacilli. The acid production from carbohydrates(cellobiose, galactose, maltose, mannitol, melibiose,ribose, sucrose, trehalose, arabinose, glycerol, fructose,glucose, lactose, mannose, melezitose, raffinose, rhamnose,D-xylose), the hydrolysis of esculin (esc), the tolerance to20, 40, 65 g/l NaCl, and the D- or L-lactic acid (D/lac, L/lac)production were evaluated by using a miniaturized assay inmicrotitre plates as previously described (Parente, Rota,Ricciardi, & Clementi, 1997). Arginine hydrolysis wastested in a modified MRS medium (MRS added with 3 g/lof arginine and sodium citrate in place of ammoniumcitrate). The isomer of lactic acid was determined by themethod of Von Krush and Lompe (1982) using 5-day-oldbroth cultures in modified MRS (MRS without meatextract, and added with 10 g/l of tryptone in place ofpeptone). Dextran production was tested as described bySchillinger and Lucke (1987).
ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Aquilanti et al. / LWT 40 (2007) 1146–11551148
2.5. Technological characterization
The acidifying and protease activities were assessed insterilized skim milk (SSM; pH 6.50) (Oxoid) at 37 1C forlactobacilli and 30 1C for lactococci, using standardizedinocula. The cultures were revitalized in MRS broth,harvested at 4000� g for 10min, washed twice with steriledistilled water, and re-suspended in 8.5 g/l NaCl (w/v).Aliquots of 0.5ml of the cell suspensions were inoculated intriplicate into 9.5ml of SSM; these gave optical densities of1.25 at 620 nm after a 1:10 dilution and they containedabout 109 cfu/ml. After 0, 8 and 24 h of incubation, 1-mlsamples were aseptically withdrawn for pH measurements,together with 1-ml aliquots of SSM as the controls, using a9224 model pH-meter (Hanna Instruments, Padova, Italy)that was equipped with an Eppendorf electrode (Hamilton,Reno Nevada, USA). Similarly, after 24 h and 7 days ofincubation, 1.5-ml aliquots were removed from each SSMculture and used for proteolysis assessment using theo-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) assay (Church, Swainsgood,Porter, & Catignani, 1983) after protein precipitation withtrichloroacetic acid (Oberg, Weimer, Moyes, Brown, &Richardson, 1991). The measurements were carried out at340 nm with an 8452 model Hewlett-Packard spectro-photometer (Waldbronn, Germany). The results werecalculated from a calibration curve obtained from dilutionof glycine in distilled water and were expressed as mg/mlglycine (Gly).
Cultures to be subjected to the assessment of thepeptidase activity were revitalized, centrifuged and washed,in duplicate, as described above. The final pellets werere-suspended in 1ml of 25mM 2-N-morpholino-ethanesul-phonic acid (MES) at pH 6.00. This suspension was pre-cooled to 4 1C (Williams, Felipe, & Banks, 1998) andmechanically disrupted by vortexing with glass-beads(150–212-mm diameter) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 cycles of30 s, with each cycle being followed by 30 s cooling. Thecrude cell-free extracts were finally separated by centrifu-gation at 8800� g at 4 1C for 1min, and then stored at�20 1C. The peptidase activities were determined using thefollowing synthetic substrates: L-Lys-, L-Glu-, L-Pro-,L-Gly-L-Pro-, L-Arg-L-Pro-p-nitroanilide (p-NA). The assaymixtures contained 195 ml of a 50mM potassium–pho-sphate buffer, pH 7.90, 90 ml of 0.5 g/l NaNO3 (v/v) and75 ml of the cell-free extract. Thirty ml of a 20mM solutionof each p-NA derivative was added separately to thismixture. After an incubation at 37 1C for 1 h, the reactionwas stopped by adding 0.9ml of an acqueous solution ofacetic acid (100ml/l). The samples were centrifuged at8800� g for 5min, and the absorbance was measuredat 410 nm. The concentrations of p-nitroanilide werecalculated using the molar absorption coefficient value(8800mol/l cm) (Rollan & Font de Valdez, 2001). One unit(U) of enzymatic activity corresponds to the amount ofenzyme that releases 1 mmol of p-nitroanilide/min under theassay conditions used. The specific enzyme activities areexpressed as U mg protein. The total amount of protein in
the cell-free extracts was quantified by the dye-bindingmethod of Bradford (1976). All of the synthetic substrateswere purchased from Sigma Chemical (Pool, UK) andBachem (Saffron Walden, UK). The kinetics of autolysiswere determined as described by Martınez-Cuesta, Pelaez,Juarez, and Requena (1997). Briefly, lactococci andlactobacilli were grown overnight in MRS broth at 30and 37 1C, respectively. Absorbance was measured at650 nm. One-millilitre aliquots of 0.7 O.D. cell suspensionswere centrifuged at 6000� g for 5min. The harvestedpellets were washed twice in 8.5% NaCl (w/v) and finallyre-suspended in 1ml lysis buffer (0.2M NaCl, adjustedto pH 5.5). The autolysis kinetics were monitored bymeasuring the O.D. of the cell suspensions at 650 nm,after 0 and 30min and after 8 h of incubation at40 1C. The results are expressed according to Langsrud,Landaas, & Castberg (1987), in terms of the autolysis ratesper h (AR) and the autolysis percentages (%), using thefollowing formulas, respectively: (AR) ¼ (A3–A2)/0.5;(%) ¼ 100–A1/A3� 100, where A1 is the final O.D., A2is the O.D measured after 30min, and A3 is the initial O.D.
2.6. Statistical analysis
Three repetitions of each phenotypic assay were per-formed. The arithmetic means and standard deviationswere calculated. A one-way analysis of variance (ANO-VA), along with the Tukey–Kramer honestly significantdifference (HSD) based on three replicates was carried outusing the Statistica software package (version 5.1, StatSoftInc., Tulsa, OK) with the following variables: VAR1,species, VAR2, strains within the same species; VAR3,autolysis rate, VAR4, acidifying activity at 8 h, VAR5,release of Gly at 24 h.
3. Results
3.1. RAPD and cluster analysis
Cluster analysis of the RAPD profiles from the 33 LABfrom starter-free Canestrato Pugliese cheese (Table 1), wereperformed separately within each species, since the absenceof a species-specific DNA band or a combination of bandsdid not allow a clear genotypic characterization when thestrains of the four species were all analysed together.As a whole, the 33 isolates were grouped into 14 different
genotypes that corresponded to single strains or clusters ofstrains. In more detail, it was possible to define: 2 clustersand 4 strains for Lb. plantarum (Fig. 1a); 3 clusters and 2independent strains for the species Lb. brevis (Fig. 1b); 1cluster and 1 strain for Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris (Fig. 1c);and 2 strains for Lb. casei (Fig. 1d).
3.2. Phenotypic characterization
Results of the 21 phenotypic tests are shown in Table 2.All of the isolates produced L-lactate either alone or
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 1
The indigenous lactic acid bacteria that were isolated from the raw milk,
curd and 1-, 2- and 4-week-old ripened Canestrato Pugliese cheese from
three dairy farms (F1, F2, F3) in the Apulia region (Southern Italy)
Species Isolate Farm Isolation source
Lactobacillus brevis 8 F1 Milk
14
45 1-week-old cheese
46
48
68 4-week-old cheese
77
81
83
86
49 F2 2-week-old cheese
58
72 F3 4-week-old cheese
73
78
Lactobacillus plantarum 29 F1 Curd
33
55 2-week-old cheese
23 F2 Curd
56 2-week-old cheese
59
17 F3 Milk
18
19
35 Curd
74 4-week-old cheese
Lactobacillus casei 30 F1 Curd
27 F3 Curd
Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris 4 F2 Milk
6 F3 Milk
28 Curd
51 1-week-old cheese
52 1-week-old cheese
L. Aquilanti et al. / LWT 40 (2007) 1146–1155 1149
together with D-lactate, and were resistant to 20 g/l NaCl.At the same time, except for two out of the five isolates thatbelonged to the species Lb. brevis and Lb. plantarum, theywere all able to ferment lactose and galactose, as well asglucose. None of the isolates either produced dextran orfermented D-arabinose.
3.3. Technological characterization
Further characterization of the isolates was carried outwith the aim of evaluating their potential for being used asindigenous starter cultures. As shown in Table 3 a widestrain-to-strain variability was observed with respect toboth the acidifying rate, assessed as the pH values after 8 h,and the acidifying power, assessed as the pH values after24 h. The majority of the isolates showed pH values lowerthan 6.00 within 8 h. Three cultures, namely isolates 56, 59and 73, that were characterized by both high acidifying
velocity and power revealed to be particularly suitable asstarters.The proteolytic activities, which were expressed as the
release of Gly after 24 h, were generally between 98.16 and184.71 mg/ml, except for a few isolates that were character-ized by notably higher (isolates 58 and 33) or lower(isolates 77 and 17) activities. These values did not increasemarkedly after 7 days of incubation, probably due to abalance between release and consumption of Gly that wasbeing progressively established during the assay. Anexception to this behaviour was seen for the isolates thatled to relevant increases in the final Gly levels (isolates 81,74 and 45) and those that, in contrast, led to notabledecreases (isolates 58 and 33).A high degree of diversity among the isolates was also
observed regarding their tendencies to lysis. Most of theisolates with the lowest percentages of lysis were ascribedto the species L. lactis subsp. cremoris, whereas the highestvalues were detected within the species Lb. brevis.Outcomes related to the amino-peptidase and dipeptidyl-
peptidase activities are shown in Table 4. The peptidaseactivities were among the highest found in this study, andthey were towards all of the substrates for isolates 58, 72and 18. Thus, isolate 72 showed the highest activity onL-Lys- and L-Gly-L-Pro-p-NA, whereas isolate 18 showedthe highest activity towards L-Glu- and L-Arg-L-Pro-p-NA.
3.4. Statistical analysis and biotypes definition
To determine if there were significant intra-species andinter-species differences among the isolates, statisticalanalyses by one-way ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer HSDwere carried out on the data sets for the acidifyingvelocities (pH value after 8 h), proteolytic activities (after24 h) and autolysis rates. Significant differences among thefour species under study were seen for the acidifying(Po0.001) and autolytic (P ¼ 0:040) activities, but not forproteolysis (P ¼ 0:749). Lb. brevis was revealed to bethe fastest acidifying species (mean, 5.78), followed byLb. plantarum (mean, 5.92), Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris
(mean, 6.03) and Lb. casei (mean, 6.25). For the autolysisrates, Lb. brevis and Lb. casei were characterized by meanvalues (0.07 and 0.06, respectively) that were markedlylower than those recorded for Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris andLb. plantarum (means, 0.13 and 0.14, respectively).The one-way ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer HSD also
allowed strain-dependent differences to be highlightedwithin each species, and 22 biotypes to be thus defined,each of which included isolates with similar proteolytic,acidifying and autolysis activities (Table 5). No correspon-dence between these biotypes and the RAPD-based clusterswere observed.
4. Discussion
Data of phenotypic characterization clearly demon-strated that these tests are not reliable enough for the
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
55
74
17
35
33
18
19
56
59
23
29
27
30
6
28
4
51
52
Lcl1
Lcl2
Lbc1
Lbc2
8
83
81
68
73
77
78
58
72
86
14
45
46
48
49
Lbb1
Lbb2
Lbb3
Lbb4
Lbb5
Lbp1
Lbp2
Lbp3
Lbp4
Lbp5
(d)
(c)
(b)
(a)
Fig. 1. The clustering of the 33 indigenous lactic acid bacteria isolated from the Canestrato Pugliese cheese on the basis of UPGMA-dendrograms from
RAPD profiles within the species Lb. plantarum (a), Lb. brevis (b), L. lactis subsp. cremoris (c), and Lb. casei (d). An 80% similarity was arbitrarily chosen
as a discriminating threshold to define the homogenous clusters, with each corresponding to a genotype.
L. Aquilanti et al. / LWT 40 (2007) 1146–11551150
identification of LAB at the species level. Indeed, as shownin Table 2, several isolates were characterized by atypicalmetabolic and biochemical behaviours respect to those
reported in the scientific literature for Lactobacillus
(Kandler & Weiss, 1984) and Lactococcus (Bottazzi,1993) species. One major reason for this mismatch might
ARTIC
LEIN
PRES
STable 2
The acid production by the 33 lactic acid bacteria isolated from the Canestrato Pugliese cheeses from 19 carbohydrates: cellobiose (cel), galactose (gal), lactose (lac), maltose (mal), mannitol (mnt),
melibiose (melb), raffinose (raf), ribose (rib), sucrose (suc), trehalose (tre), D-arabinose (D/ara), L-arabinose (L/ara), glycerol (gly), fructose (fru), glucose (glu), mannose (man), melezitose (melz),
rhamnose (rha), D-xylose (xyl)
RAPD cluster Isolate ara cel fru gal suc gly glu lac mal mnt man melz melb raf rha rib tre xil esc NaCl 20 g/l NaCl 40 g/l NaCl 65 g/l D/lac L/lac arg dex
Lbb1 8 + +a + + + � + + + + +a + + + +a + +a� + + + + + + � �
Lbb3 14 + +a + + � � + + + + � � + � � + +a + + + + + + + + �
45 �a� + + + � + + + � � � + � � + � + � + + + + + + �
46 + +a + + � � + + + + � � + � � + +a + + + + + + + + �
48 �a +a + + � � + + �
a� +a
� �a
� � + +a� + + + � + + � �
49 �a +a + + � � + + �
a� +a
� �a
� � + +a� + + + � � + + �
58 + +a + + + � + + + + +a� + � +a + +a + + + + + + + + �
68 + +a + + + + + + + + +a� + � +a + +a + + + + + + + + �
Lbb5 72 + � �a� � � + � + � � � �
a� � + � + � + + � + + + �
73 + � �a� � � + � + � � � �
a� � + � + � + + � + + + �
77 + +a + + + � + + + + +a� + � +a + +a + + + + + + + + �
78 + +a + + + � + + + + +a� + � +a + +a + + + + + + + + �
Lbb2 81 + +a + + + � + + + + +a + + + � + +a + + + + + + + + �
83 + � + + � � + + + � � � + + � �a +a
� + + + + + + + �
Lbb4 86 + � + � � � + � + � � � � � � + � + � + + � + + � �
Lbp3 18 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +a + + + + + + + + + + �
19 + + + + + � + + + + + + + + +a + + + + + + + + + + �
33 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +a + + + + + + + + + + �
35 + + + + + � + + + + + + + + +a + + + + + + + + + + �
56 + + + + + � + + + + + + + �a +a + + + + + + + + + + �
59 + + + + + � + + + + + � + �a� + + + + + + + + + + �
Lbp2 17 + �a + + + � + + + �
a�
a� + �
a +a + �a + + + + � + + � �
74 + �a + �
a�
a� + �
a + �a�
a� �
a�
a� + �
a + � + + � + + + �
Lbp4 23 � + + + �a� + + �
a�
a + � �a
�a� + + � + + + � � + + �
Lbp5 29 + �a�
a�
a�
a� + �
a + �a�
a� �
a�
a� �
a + � � + + � + + � �
Lbp1 55 + + + + + � + + + + + + + �a +a + + + + + + + + + + �
Lbc1 27 � + + + � � + + + + + � � � � + + � + + + � � + + �
Lbc2 30 � + + + � � + + + + + � � � � + + � + + + � � + + �
Lcl1 4 � + + + + � + + +a + + � � � � + +a +a +a + + � � + +a�
Lcl2 6 +a + + + +a� + + +a + + + +a +a
� + +a +a +a + +a +a +a + +a�
28 +a + + + � � + + +a + + + � � � + +a� +a + � � � + +a
�
51 � + + + +a + + + +a + + + +a� � + +a
� +a + +a� � + +a
�
52 � + + + +a� + + +a + + � � � � + +a
� +a + +a� � + +a
�
The hydrolysis of esculin and arginine, the tolerance to 20, 40 and 65 g/l NaCl, the production of L- or D-lactic acid and dextran from these lactic acid bacteria are also shown.
+ Positive reaction.
� Negative reaction.aAtypical behaviour respect to that reported in the scientific literature for Lactobacillus (Kandler & Weiss, 1984) and Lactococcus spp. (Bottazzi, 1993).
L.
Aq
uila
nti
eta
l./
LW
T4
0(
20
07
)1
14
6–
11
55
1151
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 3
The acidifying, proteolytic and autolytic activities of the lactic acid bacteria isolated from the Canestrato Pugliese cheese
Isolate Species Acidification Proteolysis Autolysis
8 h 24 h 24 h 7 days % AR
8 Lactobacillus brevis 6.3870.01 5.4770.01 135.2570.00 141.43730.60 32.1072.69 0.0370.01
14 5.9170.01 4.8070.01 147.62734.97 166.16756.83 39.3770.10 0.0370.01
45 5.6470.01 4.7170.01 147.62717.48 512.3874.37 20.7372.13 0.0670.01
46 5.7670.01 4.9870.00 141.4374.37 153.878.74 90.7771.75 0.0170.00
48 5.4970.01 4.8270.10 141.43713.11 141.43721.85 26.7571.03 0.1570.03
68 5.4870.04 4.4870.01 135.1074.37 150.8070.00 69.4870.73 0.1070.01
77 5.6370.05 4.8270.03 28.2974.37 37.5774.37 45.2072.13 0.1270.03
81 5.7670.00 4.8470.00 129.0570.10 673.40710.20 4.6071.46 0.0770.00
83 5.8670.00 5.1470.10 134.0772.14 153.0870.00 23.2573.93 0.0470.01
86 5.8670.01 5.1470.10 135.2570.00 150.2171.60 31.9571.91 0.0770.01
49 5.7370.02 4.9070.02 98.1674.37 104.3470.00 39.8473.06 0.0270.00
58 5.9170.00 4.7270.01 401.10721.85 184.71713.11 17.7571.38 0.0470.02
72 5.7670.00 4.8470.00 129.077 8.47 147.62730.60 49.0672.82 0.1470.01
73 5.3670.03 4.6070.05 135.2570.00 153.8070.00 38.7471.56 0.0870.03
78 6.1670.01 5.6770.00 122.8970.00 209.4474.37 26.2975.32 0.1470.08
29 Lactobacillus plantarum 5.9570.02 4.9370.22 184.7174.37 209.44748.08 19.7479.20 0.1370.06
33 5.8870.01 4.8870.01 376.37721.85 184.71739.34 24.7674.50 0.0870.00
55 6.1470.01 5.8370.02 116.7070.00 104.3570.00 28.5973.21 0.2270.04
23 6.1870.00 5.3170.01 122.8974.37 98.1674.37 9.2873.44 0.0170.00
56 5.5170.01 4.4170.10 116.8070.00 104.3570.14 24.5875.38 0.0770.03
59 5.5170.01 4.4170.01 135.25721.85 116.70743.71 13.4072.96 0.6070.02
17 6.3870.01 5.4770.01 29.5370.00 51.7970.00 27.0672.04 0.0770.02
18 5.5370.01 4.7670.01 184.7174.37 209.46721.85 17.1173.20 0.0770.02
19 6.2870.01 5.4070.00 135.2570.00 141.43730.60 19.2774.82 0.0570.03
35 6.2970.01 5.7070.01 166.16717.00 104.3474.30 7.0673.25 0.0570.02
74 5.5670.00 4.7970.01 129.077 0.00 673.13721.85 44.1771.14 0.1770.01
30 Lactobacillus casei 6.2970.01 5.7070.01 166.16717.00 104.3474.30 7.0673.25 0.0570.02
27 6.1170.01 5.3670.01 178.5374.37 190.8974.37 13.0675.82 0.0870.05
4 Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris 6.0070.07 4.3970.01 184.717 8.74 246.54717.48 5.2172.62 0.0470.02
6 6.2070.01 4.5570.01 159.9874.37 190.8978.47 0.00 0.0470.01
28 5.9470.01 4.4470.00 166.16717.48 104.3474.37 0.00 0.2470.02
51 5.9470.01 4.7270.00 122.8974.37 98.16726.23 11.1070.96 0.0570.02
52 6.0870.02 4.5270.01 159.9878.74 178.53739.34 9.2873.44 0.3070.01
Mean values7standard deviations are expressed as: pH after 8 and 24 h; mg/ml of Gly released after 24 h and 7 days; autolysis percentages (%) and
autolysis rates (AR).
L. Aquilanti et al. / LWT 40 (2007) 1146–11551152
be ascribed to the loss or gain of plasmids, since somecarbohydrate fermentation capacities are plasmid-encoded(Ahrne, Molin, & Stahl, 1989).
RAPD with a single primer followed by UPGMA clusteranalysis did not allow an efficacious discrimination of theisolates at the strain level. Although, a certain genotypicdiversity was found within each species, the finding of asame RAPD profile for isolates from different sourcesconfirmed the relatively low discriminating power of theRAPD typing technique (Tynkkynen, Satokari, Saarela,Mattila-Sandholm, & Saxelin, 1999), particularly when asingle primer is used. On the contrary, a high degree ofdiversity was observed in the technological traits assayed,as the tendency to lysis, in accordance with what has beenpreviously reported for Lactobacillus (Cibik & Chapot-Chartier, 2004) and Lactococcus (Ouzari, Cherif, & Mora,2002) strains. With respect to the above-cited trait, the
isolates belonging to the species Lb. brevis were the mostsuitable for use as starter cultures, since they showed thehighest percentages of lysis. Indeed, the tendency to lysis ofa starter culture is essential for the release of the bacterialintracellular enzymes into the cheese (Crow et al., 1995)and, in turn, for the increase of the cheese sensory andtextural properties (Sallami, Kheadr, Fliss, & Vuillemard,2004). Assessment of the amino-peptidase and dipeptidyl-peptidase activities, showed that these two technologicaltraits were highly dependent on the strain and thesubstrate, although in all cases the highest levels werefound on L-Lys- and L-Arg-L-Pro-p-NA. Notably (L-Lys)-aminopeptidase was seen in all of the strains, while a lackof activity towards L-Pro, L-Gly-L-Pro, L-Arg-L-Pro andL-Glu was seen for a few Lb. brevis and Lb. plantarum
isolates, although the X-Pro-dipeptidyl aminopeptidaseactivities are known to be active in all of the LAB species
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 4
Peptidase activities of the 33 lactic acid bacteria isolated from Canestrato Pugliese cheese towards L-lysine (L-Lys), L-glucine (L-Glu), L-proline (L-Pro), L-
glycine-proline (L-Gly–Pro), L-arginine-proline (L-Arg–Pro) p-NA
Isolate Species Peptidase activity
L-Lys-pNA L-Glu-pNA L-Pro-pNA L-Gly-L-Pro-pNA L-Arg-L-Pro-pNA
8 Lactobacillus brevis 4.5570.34 1.4170.24 0.00 9.1071.36 19.8971.02
14 17.2070.00 1.5170.19 1.0370.10 0.00 0.00
45 11.3070.30 0.4070.09 0.3470.05 3.4370.09 4.0570.91
46 47.2372.15 0.00 0.5370.02 12.0370.02 11.1270.22
48 16.8871.26 2.4870.38 3.3370.06 0.00 15.5571.89
68 14.9770.16 2.5370.08 0.00 3.9670.32 23.2371.62
77 12.0870.35 0.8170.03 0.00 8.1370.35 8.6370.35
81 73.8473.87 3.5571.16 0.00 3.2870.00 15.5871.55
83 16.1071.85 1.6970.06 8.7070.62 6.0971.23 26.9971.23
86 68.2671.21 1.3270.18 0.5170.07 0.00 19.6271.21
49 37.8670.75 0.0670.00 1.1770.30 17.5070.70 18.1370.00
58 23.4673.02 10.8770.30 13.5171.01 27.0272.01 18.4872.01
72 91.59715.54 2.6170.00 3.4470.10 43.5970.52 39.2071.55
73 12.6573.58 0.5070.10 0.0970.03 0.00 11.2071.53
78 45.5077.04 0.3070.03 1.0870.07 13.5170.00 2.1670.15
29 Lactobacillus plantarum 79.2372.87 0.1270.06 2.3370.43 12.2970.14 24.3775.75
33 12.6570.51 1.4170.15 0.6470.01 10.4870.51 18.0771.02
55 16.5470.35 0.1370.00 3.4470.10 43.5970.52 4.2370.92
23 14.7170.00 0.5570.08 0.00 0.00 27.5872.60
56 8.6370.36 0.7270.05 0.1070.02 5.2070.18 2.1070.25
59 8.7370.00 0.9770.14 0.4770.05 2.7270.05 3.6970.48
17 51.6471.06 0.8270.11 1.4270.11 15.6270.65 16.0970.53
18 24.3473.48 17.7770.77 4.5170.19 25.9871.93 42.3971.93
19 8.8771.21 2.2770.67 2.2470.71 21.3370.20 11.5670.61
35 57.0573.51 5.4570.70 8.1870.35 12.1570.35 24.8070.00
74 39.0570.00 0.3670.08 0.00 0.00 15.0270.00
30 Lactobacillus casei 57.0573.51 5.4570.70 8.1870.35 12.1570.35 24.8070.00
27 33.7772.51 7.1971.89 1.1570.38 12.3570.88 19.5572.51
4 Lactococcus lactis cremoris 29.7171.08 0.3870.05 0.5570.01 16.2570.07 19.0471.08
6 57.3571.98 2.0970.49 1.1570.35 13.2870.00 19.9371.48
28 14.5470.46 0.4370.09 0.6970.09 0.1970.00 0.00
51 10.6671.01 1.5670.20 0.3070.03 0.00 19.1971.01
52 27.7371.01 0.9470.13 0.7770.11 2.6370.30 5.7570.30
Mean values7standard deviation are expressed as absorbance at 410 nm.
L. Aquilanti et al. / LWT 40 (2007) 1146–1155 1153
(Kunji, Mierau, Hagting, Poolman, & Konings, 1996).Particularly, the strong X-Pro-dipeptidyl aminopeptidaseactivities of 58, 72 and 18 isolates make them of potentialinterest for use as starters, because of their capacity torelease large amounts of proline from caseins during thecheese ripening (Swaisgood, 1992).
From the results obtained in the present research work itemerged that although RAPD analysis has been widelyused for typing of LAB, the genotypic diversity highlightedthrough this technique is not necessarily related tobiochemical and metabolic differences among the isolates.This evidence underlines once again the usefulness of apolyphasic approach for the exhaustive characterizationof candidate strains to be used as starter cultures forcheese-making. Indeed, a combined approach that isbased on phenotypic and genotypic techniques increases
the resolution of each independent device, allowingthe detectable levels of strain heterogeneities to bewidened. The reliability of such an approach was alsodemonstrated by several studies focused on theevaluation of both the genetic diversity and technologicalproperties of LAB isolated from different cheeses(Lombardi et al., 2002; Giraffa et al., 2004) and dairyproducts (Mora et al., 2002).Based on the overall results from such a polyphasic
approach, it emerged that none of our isolates showed thebest performances in all of the assays carried out. As aconsequence, it can be concluded that an appropriatemixture of a few isolates, each showing one trait of interest,could be used, also in view of the high heterogeneity of thewild lactic acid populations detected in this traditionalcheese.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 5
The RAPD clusters and biotypes, related to the 33 lactic acid bacteria
isolated from Canestrato Pugliese cheese
Isolate Farm RAPD Phenotypic characterization
AA PA AR Biotype
8 F1 Lbb 1 a c a Lbr A
83 F1 Lbb 2 b c a Lbr B
81 F1 e c a Lbr C
72 F3 Lbb 3 e c a
58 F2 b b a Lbr D
73 F3 f c a Lbr E
78 F3 g c a Lbr F
77 F1 c a a Lbr G
68 F1 d c a Lbr H
45 F1 Lbb 5 d c a
46 F1 b c a Lbr I
48 F1 b c a
49 F2 c c a Lbr M
14 F1 e c a Lbr N
86 F1 Lbb 4 e c a
55 F1 Lbp 1 a a c LbpA
17 F3 Lbp 2 b b c Lbp B
74 F3 c a bc Lbp C
18 F3 Lbp 3 c c c Lbp D
19 F3 d a c Lbp E
33 F1 e d c Lbp F
35 F3 d c c Lbp G
56 F2 g a c Lbp I
59 F2 h a a Lbp L
23 F2 Lbp 4 i a c Lbp M
29 F1 Lbp 5 l c c Lbp N
30 F1 Lbc 1 a a a Lbc A
27 F3 Lbc 2 b a a Lbc B
4 F2 Lcc 1 bc b c Lcl A
6 F3 Lcc 2 a b c Lcl B
28 F3 c b b Lcl C
51 F3 c a c Lcl D
52 F3 b b a Lcl E
The statistical evaluation of the biotypes data related to: acidifying
activities after 8 h (AA); proteolytic activities after 24 h (PA) and autolysis
rates (AR). Within each species and data set, the isolates labelled with the
same letters are not significantly different (Po0.05).
L. Aquilanti et al. / LWT 40 (2007) 1146–11551154
Acknowledgements
The present research work was commissioned by themunicipality of Manfredonia (Foggia, Italy), within ProjectNo. 12/cluster C08-B ‘Valorization of dairy products’,supported by MURST. Thanks are due to ProfessorMarina Pasquini (Department of Food Science, Polytech-nic University of Marche, Italy) for the valuable statisticalelaboration of the phenotypic data.
References
Ahrne, S., Molin, G., & Stahl, S. (1989). Plasmids in Lactobacillus strains
isolated from meat and meat products. Systematic Applied Micro-
biology, 11, 320–325.
Albenzio, M., Corbo, M. R., Rehman, S. U., Fox, P. F., De Angelis, M.,
Corsetti, A., et al. (2001). Microbiological and biochemical character-
istics of Canestrato Pugliese cheese made from raw milk, pasteurized
milk or by heating the curd in hot whey. International Journal of Food
Microbiology, 67, 35–48.
Aquilanti, L., Dell’Aquila, L., Zannini, E., Zocchetti, A., & Clementi, F.
(2006). Resident lactic acid bacteria in raw milk Canestrato Pugliese
cheese. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 43, 161–167.
Bottazzi, V. (1993). Microbiologia lattiero-casearia. Bologna, Italy:
Edagricole.
Bradford, M. M. (1976). Rapid and sensitive method for the quantifica-
tion of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of
protein–dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248–254.
Cibik, R., & Chapot-Chartier, M. P. (2004). Characterisation of autolytic
enzymes in Lactobacillus pentosus. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 38,
459–463.
Cocconcelli, P. S., Porro, D., Galandini, S., & Senini, L. (1995).
Development of RAPD protocol for typing of strains of lactic acid
bacteria and enterococci. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 21, 376–379.
Church, F., Swainsgood, H. E., Porter, D., & Catignani, G. (1983).
Spectrophotometric assay using o-phthaldialdehyde for determination
of proteolysis in milk and isolated milk proteins. Journal of Dairy
Science, 66, 1219–1227.
Crow, V. L., Coolbear, T., Gopal, P. K., Martley, F. G., McKay, L. L., &
Riepe, H. (1995). The role of autolysis of lactic acid bacteria in the
ripening of cheese. International Dairy Journal, 5, 855–875.
De Angelis, M., Corsetti, A., Tosti, N., Rossi, J., Corbo, M. R., &
Gobbetti, M. (2001). Characterization of non-starter lactic acid
bacteria from Italian ewe cheeses based on phenotypic, genotypic,
and cell wall protein analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,
67, 2011–2020.
de Los Reyes-Gavillan, C. G., Limsowtin, G. K. Y., Tailliez, P., Sechaud,
L., & Accolas, J. P. (1992). A Lactobacillus helveticus-specific DNA
probe detects restriction fragment length polymorphisms in this
species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58, 3429–3432.
Dice, L. R. (1945). Measures of the amount of ecological association
between species. Ecology, 26, 297–302.
Du Plessis, E. M., & Dicks, L. M. (1995). Evaluation of random
polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR as a method to differentiate
Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus amylo-
vorus, Lactobacillus gallinarum, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lactobacillus
johnsonii. Current Microbiology, 31, 114–118.
Giraffa, G., Andrighetto, C., Antonello, C., Gatti, M., Lazzi, C.,
Marcazzan, G., et al. (2004). Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis strains of dairy origin. Interna-
tional Journal of Food Microbiology, 91, 129–139.
Kandler, O., & Weiss, N. (1984). Genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901,
212AL. In N. R. Krieg, & J. G. Holt (Eds.), Bergey’s manual of
systematic bacteriology, Vol. II (pp. 1209–1234). Baltimore, USA: The
Williams & Wilkins Co.
Kunji, E. R. S., Mierau, I., Hagting, A., Poolman, B., & Konings, W. N.
(1996). The proteolytic system of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van
Leeuwenhock, 70, 187–221.
Langsrud, T., Landaas, A., & Castberg, H. B. (1987). Autolytic properties
of different strains of group N streptococci. Milchwissenschaft, 42,
556–560.
Lombardi, A., Maistro, L. D., De Dea, P., Gatti, M., Giraffa, G., &
Neviani, E. (2002). A polyphasic approach to highlight genotypic and
phenotypic diversities of Lactobacillus helveticus strains isolated from
dairy starter cultures and cheeses. Journal of Dairy Research, 69,
139–149.
Mannu, L., & Paba, A. (2002). Genetic diversity of lactococci and
enterococci isolated from home-made Pecorino Sardo ewes’ milk
cheese. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92, 55–62.
Martınez-Cuesta, M. C., Pelaez, C., Juarez, M., & Requena, T. (1997).
Autolysis of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis and Lactobacillus casei ssp.
casei: Cell lysis induced by crude bacteriocin. International Journal of
Food Microbiology, 38, 125–131.
ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Aquilanti et al. / LWT 40 (2007) 1146–1155 1155
Mora, D., Fortina, M. G., Parini, C., Ricci, G., Gatti, M., Giraffa, G.,
et al. (2002). Genetic diversity and technological properties of
Streptococcus thermophilus strains isolated from dairy products.
Journal of Applied Microbiology, 93, 278–287.
Oberg, C. J., Weimer, B. C., Moyes, L. V., Brown, R. J., & Richardson,
G. H. (1991). Proteolytic characterization of Lactobacillus delbrueckii
ssp. bulgaricus strains by the O-phthaldialdehyde test and amino acid
analysis. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 398–403.
Ouzari, H., Cherif, A., & Mora, D. (2002). Autolytic phenotype of
Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from traditional Tunisian dairy
products. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92, 812–820.
Parente, E., Rota, M. A., Ricciardi, A., & Clementi, F. (1997).
Characterization of natural starter cultures used in the manifacture
of Pasta Filata cheese in Basilicata (Southern Italy). International
Dairy Journal, 7, 775–783.
Rohlf, F. J. (1993). NTSYS. PC. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate
analysis system, version 1.8. New York, NY: Applied Biostatistics Inc.
Rollan, G., & Font de Valdez, G. (2001). The peptide hydrolase system of
Lactobacillus reuteri. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 70,
303–307.
Sallami, L., Kheadr, E. E., Fliss, I., & Vuillemard, J. C. (2004). Impact of
autolytic, proteolytic, and nisin-producing adjunct cultures on
biochemical and textural properties of Cheddar cheese. Journal of
Dairy Science, 87, 1585–1594.
Schillinger, U., & Lucke, F. K. (1987). Identification of lactobacilli from
meat and meat products. International Journal of Food Microbiology,
4, 199–208.
Sokal, R. R., & Michener, C. D. (1958). A statistical method for
evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansansas Science
Bulletin, 22, 1409–1438.
Steele, J. L., & Unlu, G. (1992). Impact of lactic acid bacteria on cheese
flavour development. Food Technology, 46, 128–135.
Swaisgood, H. E. (1992). Chemistry of the caseins. In P. F. Fox (Ed.),
Advance dairy chemistry (p. 63110). London, UK: Elsevier Applied
Publishers.
Tynkkynen, S., Satokari, R., Saarela, M., Mattila-Sandholm, T., &
Saxelin, M. (1999). Comparison of ribotyping, randomly amplified
polymorphic DNA analysis, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in
typing of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. casei strains. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology, 65, 3908–3914.
Williams, A. G., Felipe, X., & Banks, J. M. (1998). Aminopeptidase and
dipeptidyl peptidase activity of Lactobacillus spp. and non-starter
lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB) isolated from Cheddar cheese. Interna-
tional Dairy Journal, 8, 255–266.
Vandamme, P., Pot, B., Gillis, M., De Vos, P., Kersters, K., & Swings, J.
(1996). Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial
systematics. Microbiological Reviews, 60, 407–438.
Von Krush, U., & Lompe, A. (1982). Schnellest zum qualitativen
nachweiss von L (+) and D (�) milchsaure fur die bestimmung von
milchsaurebakterien. Milchwissenshaft, 37, 65–68.