Post on 17-Jan-2023
Lessons Learned US 36 Express Lanes
CDOT Project No. NH0361-093 17516|18194|18195
June 2016
Colorado Department of Transportation US 36 Express Lanes Project
500 Eldorado Blvd., Suite 2301 Broomfield, CO 80021
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Introduct
Lessons L
US 36 Ex
US 36 Ex
US 36 Ph
Disadv
Docum
Draina
Earthw
Enviro
Intellig
Landsc
Mainte
Mainte
Modifi
Partne
Project
Project
Procur
Public
Quality
Right o
RTD C
Signing
Structu
Survey
Third-P
Utility
Acronym
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
tion ..............
Learned Ove
xpress Lanes
xpress Lanes
hase 1 Lesson
vantaged Bus
ment Control
age ................
work, Geotec
onmental ......
gent Transpo
caping and Ir
enance Durin
enance of Tra
ications to St
r Coordinati
t Controls/Sc
t/Contract M
rement/Evalu
Information
y Manageme
of Way .........
Coordination
g, Striping, S
ures ..............
y ....................
Party Agreem
Relocations
m List ............
es Project eport
.....................
erview ..........
Project Back
Project Less
ns Learned ...
siness Enterp
.....................
.....................
chnical, and P
.....................
ortation Syste
rrigation .....
ng Construct
affic (MOT)
tandard Spec
ion (CDOT a
cheduling ....
Management
uation/Select
n ....................
ent ................
.....................
....................
Signals, and L
.....................
.....................
ments ..........
.....................
.....................
Table
.....................
.....................
kground and
sons Learned
.....................
prises (DBE)
.....................
.....................
Pavements ...
.....................
em and Elect
.....................
tion ...............
.....................
cifications ....
and Contract
.....................
.....................
tion Phase ....
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
Lighting ......
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
e of Conten
......................
......................
d Overview ..
d – Master C
......................
and Workfo
......................
......................
......................
......................
tronic Toll C
......................
......................
......................
......................
tor) ...............
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
nts
.....................
.....................
.....................
Contact List .
.....................
orce Develop
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
Collection .....
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
pment ............
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
2
....... 3
....... 3
....... 3
....... 7
....... 8
....... 8
....... 9
..... 11
..... 13
..... 14
..... 18
..... 21
..... 22
..... 23
..... 26
..... 26
..... 27
..... 29
..... 31
..... 33
..... 35
..... 38
..... 39
..... 42
..... 43
..... 46
..... 46
..... 47
..... 49
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Any projexperiencincludes Coloradolocal jurilearning own lessoa $317M
After thebest pracand projeconstructLessons LPertinent
Lessons Lthat are sareas for
Effectivelessons lethe remai
The US 3part of a Alternaticleared pidentifiedUS 36 RO
The US 3an expresLouisvillTransit (Bcommutefor tollinRTD.
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ect the size ces. The USmultiple fun
o Departmenisdictions – wfrom past prons, which a
M design-buil
e initial year ctices, and coect phases artion of most Learned fromt additional l
Learned are shared to proimprovemen
e organizatioearned compining project
US 36
36 Corridor wFinal Enviro
ive for the coplanned imprd as “Phase IOD has been
36 Express Lss lane in eale/Superior. BRT) and toer bikeway, ag, transit and
es Project eport
of the US 3636 Express
nding partnernt of Transpowhich adds tractices. Eacare captured ld project an
of constructontinue to bure completedof the Phase
m the Phase lessons from
L
general statomote repeatnt that are sh
ons use past epiled in the rt and on futu
6 Express L
was the subjonmental Imorridor. A Rerovements frI” of the FEIn separated i
Lanes Phase ch direction The lanes w
olled vehicleadd BRT imd traveler in
Int
6 Express LaLanes Projers – High-Peortation (CDto the complch agency bri
in this repord Phase 2 is
tion, CDOT uild upon it ad. As of earlye 2 elements1 project, m
m Phase 2 hav
Lessons Le
ements that t applicationhared to prov
experience areport will beure CDOT p
Lanes Pro
ject of numempact Statem
ecord of Decrom Federal IS. For constinto two pha
1 Project is on US 36 fr
will accommos. In addition
mprovementsformation, a
roduction
anes Project ect is a $450erformance T
DOT), Regionlexities of things their unrt. The Projea $180M Pu
decided to bas Phase 1 coy 2016, Phass is also commany of whicve been adde
earned Ov
describe goo. They may vide continu
as a guide toe used as a trojects.
oject Back
erous studiesment (FEIS) e
cision (RODBoulevard ttruction, Pha
ases (Phase 1
a $317 millirom Federal odate High On, the projec, and install
and incident
n
has somethimillion, mu
Transportatinal Transpor
he project, asnique expertiect is brokenublic Private
begin documonstruction cse 1 is substa
mplete. This dch were appled though to
verview
od practices also be desc
uous improve
improve futtool for impr
kground an
s between 20effort. The F
D) was signedto Foothills Pase I of the P1 and Phase 2
ion, multi-mBoulevard t
Occupancy Vct will replacIntelligent Tmanagemen
ing to learn fulti-modal pron Enterprisrtation Distris well as the ise to the tea
n into two Phe Partnership
menting lessocontinues, Pantially comdocument folied to the Pho later versio
or innovativcriptions of cement.
ture performrovement on
nd Overvi
002 and 2009FEIS resultedd in DecembParkway in BPreferred Al2).
modal projectto 88th StreeVehicles (HOce several brTransportationt. It is led by
from its roject that se (HPTE), ict (RTD) animportance
am and has thases – Phasp (P3) projec
ons learned aPhase 2 beginmplete, and thocuses on thehase 2 projecons.
ve approachechallenges or
mance. The n construction
iew
9 conducted d in a Preferrber 2009 whBoulder, ternative in
t that will buet in OV), Bus Raridges, build on Systems (y CDOT and
3
nd of
their e 1 is ct.
and ns, he e ct.
es r
n of
as a red
hich
the
uild
apid a
(ITS) d
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
CDOT sethe Phasepublic in
Phase 2 oBoulder. and finanand I-25 same as fschedule
Phase 1
ABpv
Rsh
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
elected the Ae 1 project an July 2015.
of the US 36Plenary Roa
nce the PhaseExpress Lanfor the Phased to be comp
Project Ele
Add a buffer-Boulevard an
eople total inehicle;
Reconstruct ahoulders;
es Project eport
Ames Granitnd they bega
6 Express Laads Denver we 2 US 36 Enes for 50 yee 1 project. Cpleted by ear
ements
-separated exnd 88th Streetn the car), an
and widen th
e Joint Ventan constructi
anes Project iwas selectedxpress Laneears. The conConstructionrly 2016.
xpress lane it (See Figurend tolled veh
he highway t
Figure 1 ‐ P
ture (AGJV)ion in July 2
is extendingd in mid-201es. They willnstruction ann on Phase 2
in each direce 1) for BRThicles travell
to accommod
Phase 1 Location
) team as the2012. The m
g the express3 as the con
l also operatend design me
2 began in lat
ction of US 3T, with two oling with tw
date 12-foot
n Map
e design-builmanaged lane
s lanes to Tabncessionaire e and maintaembers of thte 2013 and
36 between For more pass
wo or less peo
t-wide inside
ld contractors opened to
ble Mesa in to design, buain the Phasehe team are tthe project i
Federal sengers (threople in the
e and outside
4
r for the
uild e 1, 2 the is
ee
e
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
RSN
WP
Apr
In
In
Impr
Phase 2
AFpv
RT
W
Rov
Win
Apr
In
In
Im
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Replace the Wheridan Bou
Northern San
Widen the USromenade D
Add BRT impriority impro
nstall ITS fo
nstall a separ
mprove RTDrotection.
Project Elem
Add a buffer-oothills Parkeople total inehicle;
ReconstructinTable Mesa;
Widening the
Replacing thever South B
Widening thenterchange to
Adding BRT riority impro
nstalling ITS
nstalling a se
mproving the
es Project eport
Wadsworth Pulevard bridgnta Fe Railwa
S 36 bridgesDrive;
provements,ovements at
r tolling, tra
rate commut
D stations alo
ments
-separated exkway (See Fn the car), an
ng two gener
e highway to
e US 36 overoulder Creek
e McCaslin Bo a diverging
improvemenovements at
S for tolling,
eparate comm
e RTD statio
Parkway, Wages over US ay and Lowe
s over West F
, including nramps;
ansit and trav
ter bikeway
ong the corri
xpress lane iFigure 2) for nd tolled veh
ral purpose l
o accommoda
r Coal Creekk bridge;
Boulevard ovg diamond in
nts includingramps;
transit and t
muter bikew
on at McCas
adsworth Bo36, and the
ell Boulevar
Flatiron Cro
new electroni
veler informa
along much
idor, includi
in each direcBRT, HOV
hicles travell
lanes in each
ate 12-foot-w
k Bridge and
ver US 36 brnterchange;
g new electr
traveler info
way along the
slin Boulevar
oulevard (at US 36 bridg
rd;
ssing, East F
ic display si
ation and inc
h of the corrid
ing new cano
ction of US 3with two or
ling with tw
h direction b
wide inside a
d rehabilitati
ridge and rec
ronic display
ormation and
e rest of the
rd.
112th Avenuges over the
Flatiron Cro
gnage at stat
cident mana
dor; and
opies with en
36 between 8r more passe
wo or less peo
between 88th
and outside
ing and wide
constructing
y signage at s
d incident ma
corridor; an
ue), and Burlington
ssing and
tions and bu
gement;
nhanced wea
88th Street aengers (threeople in the
h Street and
shoulders;
ening the US
g the existing
stations and
anagement;
d
5
us
ather
and e
S 36
g
bus
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Phase 1
CDOT hafor ColorPhase 1 p
M
M
M
Mpu
Mco
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Project Goa
as made it thrado that moproject, the t
Maximize sco
Minimize ope
Meet or beat
Minimize incublic
Maximize engonstruction a
es Project eport
als
he agency’s most effectivelteam set the
ope and imp
erating and l
schedule to
convenience
gagement ofand sustaina
Figure 2 ‐ P
mission to ply and safelyfollowing go
rovements w
life cycle ma
be fully ope
to the pub
f local workeability of imp
Phase 2 Location
provide the by moves peopoals early in
within the pr
aintenance co
rational by J
blic, and ma
ers, businessprovements
n Map
best multi-mople, goods an
n the project
roject budget
osts and pro
July 1, 2015
aximize safe
ses and com
odal transpond informatidevelopmen
t
ovide a qualit
ety of worke
mmunities in
ortation systeion. For the nt process:
ty product
ers and trav
the developm
6
em
veling
ment,
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
US
Scott Re
CDOT PScott.Re
Mark Tal
Function
Mark.Tal
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
S 36 Expre
ees
Project Direcees@state.co
lvitie
nal Lead/Coo
lvitie@jacob
es Project eport
ess Lanes
ctor o.us
ordinator
bs.com
Project
Project L
t website: w
Lessons Le
Bob H
CDOT
Robert
RTD P
Nadine
Svetlan
www.us36exp
earned – M
ays
T Design Ma
t.Hays@state
Project Direc
e.Lee@rtd-d
na.Grechka@
presslanes.co
Master Con
anager
e.co.us
ctor
denver.com
@rtd-denver
om
ntact List
r.com
7
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
The follothe US 3contain aor best prDevelopm
DisadvDevelo
1. Ove
The projecontract, submit asWorkforcidentifyinrelated tocommunWorkforc(WIN)” p
2. Back
A commiThey comexpectedparticipatperformaincluding The WFDThereforthus, requman hour
3. The
RFP
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
owing section6 Phase 1 Ex
an Overviewractices for ement/Procur
vantageopment
rview
ect had a DBequates to a
s a part of thce Developmng and incoro the fifth prities in the dce Developmprogram.
kground/S
itment to memmitted to ud to surpass tting. Two D
ance issue. Ag DBEs, to h
D goal was se, the goal wuiring more rs increased.
Lessons
Developmen
es Project eport
US 3ns contain Lxpress Lanes
w of the elemeach elemenrement Phase
dBusine
BE goal of 12approximatelheir proposalment Programrporating traioject goal: “
developmentment Program
Status
eet the 12% utilizing six Dhe 12% goal
DBE firms haA report is suhelp paint the
set at 10% ofwas a “movintraining hou.
nt/Procurem
36 Phase Lessons Lears Project. Th
ment, some Bnt, generally e and Implem
essEnter
2 percent, wly $27.7 mills, their apprm that descriining opport
“Maximize e, constructiom requireme
DBE goal wDBE design l at project c
ave been replubmitted mone big picture
f the total mng” goal. Thurs. This be
ment Phase
1 Lessonrned for manhe sections aackground aseparated inmentation/C
rprises(D
which of the olion. In addi
roach and coibes the Proptunities in thengagement oon and sustaient was base
was providedfirms and 16
completion. laced – one nthly that sh
e of the proje
an hours. The contractorecame more
ns Learneny of the discare organizedand Status onnto lessons leonstruction
(DBE)an
original $23ition, the ITP
ommitments poser’s inno
he Project woof local worinability of id on RTD’s
d by AGJV p6 DBE consThey currenvoluntarily a
hows the statect.
he contractor more than difficult for
ed ciplines and d alphabetican the elemenearned from Phase.
ndWorkf
1 million coP required prelated to a
ovative approork force. Thrkers, busineimprovemen“Workforce
prior to awartruction firmntly have 47and the othetus of all sub
or committeddoubled thethe contract
key elemenally, and eacnt, and Lessothe RFP
force
onstruction roposers to proposed
oach to his requiremesses, and nts.” The e Initiative N
rd of the conms AGJV is DBE firms
er was a bcontractors,
d to 14%. eir man hourstor to meet a
8
ts of ch ons
ment
Now
ntract.
,
s; as the
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
VD
Ainprcoco
Wcoin
D(i
Cd
Wan
Imple
Eth
Docum
1. Ove
The RFPand otheruse Aconutilizes oCDOT, JAconex, they are t
2. Back
Several pvia Aconmails in A
3. The
RFP
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Verify that feDBE particip
Add to requirnformation. Troject, becauontractor bidontractor to
When reviewommitmentsncluded in E
Define total wincluding ma
Clarify what etermination
When determnd a contrac
ementation/
Ensure that whrough the p
mentCon
rview
P Book 2 Secr documentsnex for docuon the FasTraJacobs, RTDas well as altransmitted t
kground/S
processes havnex. The projAconex.
Lessons
Developmen
es Project eport
ederal and CDation (i.e. tru
rements a repThe WFD gouse the origind required simeet becaus
wing commitms are only coxhibit J on P
workforce hoanagement a
contractor stn (all staff, o
mining the gotor to accom
/Constructio
workforce derogram.
ntrol
ction 2 requir to CDOT vment controacks program
D, AGJV andll responses through Aco
Status
ve been docuject has accu
nt/Procurem
DOT DBE rucking).
port of all suoal on this pnal proposalgnificantly mse of trained
ments, reinfoounted for truPhase 1 but i
ours to includnd superviso
taff is includor excluding
oal a total numplish which
on Phase
velopment s
red that “theia CDOT’s Dl during con
m. All organd HDR). All
to submittalonex.
umented forumulated nea
ment Phase
requirements
ubcontractorsroject was bl hours weremore trainingwork force,
orce to the cucks that areit wasn’t poi
de professionory positions
ded in the Wproject man
umber of traih would bene
staff is doing
e contractor sDocument M
nstruction, wnizations are documents als, and docum
r a variety ofarly 40,000 d
s do not conf
s including Dbased on totae doubled theg hours. Th,
ontractor thae owned andinted out till
nal and skills).
Workforce Denagement).
ning hours wefit the traini
g the duties t
shall transmManagementwhich is the w
registered thare required ments are no
f different sudocuments a
flict in regar
DBEs with pal man hourse WFD goal his was diffic
at DBE truckoperated bylater in the p
led craft emp
evelopment P
would be beting program
they are assi
mit all requiret System.” Cweb-based syhat are on thto be transm
ot considered
ubmittals thaand nearly 2
rds to eligibl
payment s worked on of 14% that
cult for the
king y DBEs. It isproject.
ployees
Program hou
tter to monitm in general.
gned to do
ed deliverablCDOT electeystem that R
he project (i.emitted using d official unl
at are transm8,000 inform
9
le
the t the
urs
tor
les d to
RTD e.
less
mitted mal
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
BCdthwHo
BCPinC
Pprat
RP
Dis
Imple
S
Efo
D
Unu
Pco
San(m
Um
Uthsyac
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Be clear in RFCDOT-provid
ocumentatiohe project. P
were not locaHPTE rather
f documents
Be specific inContractor to
roject. CDOncorporating
Change (FDC
rovide guiderocessed betttachments f
Require Contlan (QMP).
Developing as key to utiliz
ementation/
et up placeh
Ensure use stor the docum
Document pro
Use referenceumbering m
erform qualiontractor/sub
et up procesnd that NDCmonthly/qua
Utilizing a pamaintain plan
Using an estahan 40,000 dystem wouldccess docum
es Project eport
FP requiremded documenon be submitPhase II was ated at the prthan utilizin
s which mad
n the RFP on maintain up
OT must audig the latest fiCs).
elines for thetween the defor review).
tractor to util
and implemezing the CD
/Constructio
holders for do
atus field to ment.
ocesses in th
e column formechanism.
ity checks tobcontractor.
ss for insurinCs and FDCsarterly).
aperless job in sets and do
ablished Intedocuments ind require sign
ments from re
ments what thnt control sytted via documore challe
roject site. Tng the documde it more dif
n as-built drapdated Compit this procesles for Notic
e oversight oesigner and t
lize Project I
enting a consOT-provided
on Phase
ocuments th
track the do
he PIM in Ac
r documents
o make sure
ng that Releas are incorpo
is very efficiocuments.
rnet based dn Aconex. Mnificant staffemote locati
he CDOT exystem. In adument controenging becauTherefore, a ment control fficult to trac
awing requirputer-aided dss regularly tce of Design
of the Releasthe contracto
Instruction M
sistent namind document
hat need to be
ocument with
conex.
that will be
there is cons
ased for Conorated into R
ient and dec
document conManaging theff time. The Ions (other o
xpectation is ddition, requiol system. Tuse of involvlot of documsystem. Thck all docum
rements includesign (CADto insure tha
n Change (ND
sed for Inforor (require si
Manual (PIM
ng conventiocontrol syst
e submitted
h regard to w
submitted c
sistency in ti
nstruction (RRFC sets on a
creases staff t
ntrol systeme document cInternet-baseffices, home
for the contire that all o
This was easivement of HPmentation wahis required amentation.
uding requirD) files durinat the ContraDCs) and Fi
rmation (RFIignatures/nec
M) per Quali
on for all protem.
by contracto
who needs to
consistently s
itle names fo
RFC) plans ara regular bas
time require
m is a must. Tcontrol proceed system ale, the field, e
tractor usingfficial ier in Phase PTE staff thas sent directa lot of chas
ring the ng the life ofactor is usingield Design
Is) documencessary
ity Managem
oject docume
or/team.
o be responsi
so there is a
or the same
re transmittesis
ed to update
There are moess without tlso allows stetc.).
10
a
I of hat tly to
sing
f the g and
nts
ment
ents
ible
ed
and
ore this aff to
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
UcoresiM
Draina
1. Ove
The 11-mdrainage quality oaccommocompanierequired
2. Back
As part oencompadesign wsystems, forth in iTechnica
3. The
RFP
Bbeximwpponuco
Futh
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Using the RTomments onesolution of imilar for fut
Management
age
rview
mile stretch odesign. RFPn the projectodate the ultes are to be rthe CLOMR
kground/S
of the US 36 assed the find
was taken to apreliminarydentifying a
al Requireme
Lessons
Developmen
Be more spececause propoxample, "all mplied havin
would not neeonds built tolacement shaf the work inoise walls." ltimate buildompanies an
or storm draltimate confhat detains fl
es Project eport
TD Quality Mn design submdesign issueture design bsection belo
of reconstrucP Book 2 Sect. Eighteen ttimate roadwreplaced. Th
R/LOMR pro
Status
EIS, a concdings in the at least a 30
y pond locatiareas of concents.
nt/Procurem
cific on whatosers see theponds shall
ng the contraed to be re-go the ultimatall accommoncluding butWhat this st
d-out configund ROW nee
ains, the requfiguration. Alows to their
Management mittals has bes and commbuild projectow for additi
ction along Uction 12 incltotal water qu
way configurhe project alsocess to mod
eptual drainROD. As a ppercent leveons and asso
cern during d
ment Phase
t "accommodese items as accommoda
actor build thgraded in thee volume. Aodate the ultt not limited tatement impuration with
eds are addre
uirement waAll flows, incr historic rate
Oversight (been very effments. Recom
ts that can beional inform
US 36 Phaseluded specifuality and de
ration. Eightso includes tdify floodpla
age analysispart of the Rel to verify feociated ROWdesign so tha
date" meansvalue-addedate the ultimhe pond to the future. At t
Another examimate configto bikeway,
plied was to h this project essed with th
s to convey cluding the 1e. The follow
(QMO) databfective in orgmmend that Ce implement
mation.
e 1 touched nfic requiremeetention pontotal irrigati
three major Fain boundari
s was prepareRFP developmfeasibility of W needs. Conat those areas
s for drainagd features rat
mate configurhe ultimate vthe end of thmple is, "struguration and, guardrail, bbuild all irri such that fu
his project.
flows from U00-year, mu
wing stateme
base to log aganizing andCDOT develted statewide
nearly everyents for drainnds are to beion crossingFEMA crossies.
ed in May 2ment, prelim
f on-site and nsiderable es could be re
e and irrigatther than reqration." Thisvolume suchhe day, we aructure lengthd shall considbarrier, retainigation crossuture agreem
US 36 for thust be conveyent was adde
and track d recording tlop somethine. See Quali
y aspect of nage and wa constructed
gs of 4 indivisings that
009 that minary draina
off-site stormffort was pueferenced in
tion crossingquirements. Fs statement h that the ponre getting thehs and headwder other feaning walls ansings to the
ments with di
he 10-year yed to any ped in the Pha
11
the ng ity
ater d to idual
age m
ut the
gs For
nds e
wall atures nd
itch
pond ase 2
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
tegrdal
RRci
Bsydthar“ispan
RR
R
CreinEfaovof
NTtuloin
Ftrmreloab
InimF
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
echnical requradient belowischarge. Thllowable spr
Revise SectioRCP shall be ircular.
Be clearer onystems are reesign storm he 10-year stre typically ninlets shouldpread to withnd limit flow
Revise scheduReport to read
Revise the Dr
Considerable eferring the rnterpretation
Examples incactors for inlf “Area Specarious locatif specific req
Need to have The software urn have muook into this nclude a min
or temporaryrack all temp
monthly repoequirement focation and tbandonment
nclude a statmplications dloodplain D
es Project eport
uirements, "sw the top of
he hydraulic read width pe
on 12.3.2 Promade with c
n inlet requireequired for his exceeded torm.” This inarrower thad be spaced thin a depth tw across exp
ule column id “Prior to P
rainage Repo
detail was areader to var
n and provideclude providilets and defincific Drainagions along thquirements n
some type owill continultiple inlets sfurther to se
nimum allow
y drainage, rporary drainaort that tracksfor future protype of pipe t of removal
tement similadue to any thevelopment
storm drainsf pavement agradient forer Table 12.
oject Specialconfined rub
ements for bhighway bridand to limit
isn’t always an on a roadwto coincide wtwo inches aansion joint
in the deliveProject Accep
ort Outline t
added to Secrious referened the contraing a rainfalning where wge Requiremhe corridor thneeds to be b
of threshold ue to requirespaced closeee if either th
wable bypass
requirementsage that is ins all temporaojects. The pand connectafter the per
ar to, “CDOhird party pePermits, etc
s under US 3and inlet gratr the 100-yea2-2 is not ex
l Provisions bber gaskets
bridges. Sectdges when mt flow acrosspractical on
way. Statemwith piers to at the curb ors to less than
erable table fptance.”
to include a R
ction 12 as tonce manuals.actor and CDl table for thwater quality
ments” sectiohat were idebalanced aga
for spread u inlets until
ely together he language s flow.
s should be anstalled and pary pipe andplan would ntion to existirmanent drai
OT will not bermit processc.
36 shall be dtes for the 10ar return freqxceeded.”
under 603.0to include e
tion 12.2.4.8maximum alls expansion jn bridges sin
ment should b keep the mar shoulder pln one cfs for
for the Final
References S
o what we ex. This minimDOT a “blache entire corry ponds are
on provided sentified in prainst potenti
using the Stothere is a truat the end offor bypass f
added to theprovide loca
d inlet installneed to be aping if requireinage is in p
e held accouses.” For exa
designed with0-year returnquency shall
07(a) to incluelliptical pipe
8 states “decklowable flowjoints to less
nce bridge shbe revised toaximum allolus half of thr the 10-year
Drainage an
Section.
xpect to be bmized the amck and white”ridor, defininto be locatedspecific requ
reliminary deially limiting
orm and Saniue 0.00 cfs bf storm seweflow can be
e RFP to havations via as-led on the prpproved anded, and resol
place.
untable for sample: CLO
h the hydraun frequency l be such tha
ude all jointse as well as
k drainage w spread for s than 1 cfs fhoulder widtho something owable flow he adjacent lar storm.”
nd Water Qu
built rather thmount of
” approach. ng clogging d. The additiuirements ofesign. Definig innovation
itary softwarbypass. We iner runs. Needchanged or
ve the contra-built plans. roject shouldd should inclulution for
chedule OMR, LOMR
12
ulic peak
at the
s for
the for hs like
ane
uality
han
ion f ition .
re. n d to
ctor A
d be a ude
R,
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
ItMseC
Ifas
Imple
TstOdr
Aacin
Dcooncob
Acost
N“a
Earthw
1. Ove
MainlinePavemenMix AspgrubbingmitigatinBase Cougeotechn
2. Back
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
t should be rManager for tegments, and
CDOT and th
f a project iss “if required
ementation/
Temporary drtrategy for d
Otherwise, thrainage beco
Acceptance occeptance. Tnstalled line
During the beompaction tef the pipe, ifeed to have ompaction inackfill even
As-built drainompleting thtarted on the
Need to speciadequate cov
work,Ge
rview
e US 36 pavent) while ramhalt base top
g, excavationng soils that hurse. RFP Bonical and pav
kground/S
es Project eport
required to dthe contractod each segmhe contractor
using UDFCd by the eng
/Constructio
rainage plandrainage untihe contractoromes a piece
of permanentThis test wou
for alignmen
edding and best on the arf the pipe diaa thicker liftn this zone. Awith the top
nage plans shhem as constem.
ify minimumver” or confo
eotechnic
ement is beinmps and mostpped with Stn and embankhave swell pook 2 Sectio
vements on th
Status
define one peor. Large des
ment will havr it minimize
CD criteria, gineer” in the
on Phase
ns need to bel the new pe
r starts instale-meal system
t drainage shuld require thnt issues.
backfill proceea of the bacameter exceet above the pA solution c
p of the pipe.
hould have atruction prog
m cover on pform to AAS
cal,and
ng constructt side roads tone Matrix Akment work
potential, plaons 10 and 1he project.
erson in the csign build pre a lead. Wh
es inconsiste
need to be se contract.
tied into theermanent syslling pipe whm that is oft
hould includhe Quality A
ess the contrckfill from seds 24 inchepipe for protecould be that.
a schedule pgresses and n
pipe for metaSHTO requir
Paveme
ed with rigidare being coAsphalt). Ea
k to build up acing R-valu1 included th
contract as throjects will uhen there is oencies and im
specific and
e MOT phasstem is onlinhenever proben insufficie
de lamp testinAssurance (Q
ractors shouspring line (res. The contrection, havet the contract
er the RFP tnot waiting u
al/plastic/RCrements.
ents
d pavement onstructed warthwork conthe roadway
ue 20 materiahe requirem
he Drainageultimately beone point of mproves com
address any
sing plans, sone and functiblems arise aent for larger
ng as a requiQA) to look t
uld be requirerequired on Rractor has stae seemed to stor has a hol
that ensures until the end
CP. M-603-1
(Portland Cewith flexible p
nsists of cleay section. Thal and placin
ments for eart
e Design e split into
f contact betwmmunication
items called
o there is a cioning. and temp r storm flow
irement for through the
ed to documRCP) to the ated that theystruggle gettld point at th
the contractod of the job t
&2 call out
ement Concrpavements (aring and his includes ng Aggregatethwork,
13
ween n.
d out
clear
ws.
ment top y ting he
or is o get
rete Hot
e
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Preliminaand crossRFP docuthe work A life-cyand appromainlineminimum
3. The
RFP
InVAintr
In
Fw
Imple
Nsoop
Imb
CO
Atr
Ed
Enviro
1. Ove
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ary geotechns road pavemuments. The
k.
ycle cost analoved which . Preliminary
m pavement,
Lessons
Developmen
nitial RFP inValues. ManyATCs to altern a short timreatments tha
nclude speci
urther definewidenings as
ementation/
Need a betteroils-cuts, fillptions would
mprove QA een satisfact
Construction Owner Verifi
Allow for Quraditional CD
Emphasize anoubling as Q
onmenta
rview
es Project eport
nical investigment and strue contractor
lysis (LCCAdocumentedy pavement base, and su
nt/Procurem
ncluded fairlyy proposer ter the requiremeframe. For at may be pr
fications/req
e the use of needed.
/Constructio
r tracking anls, swelling sd be key map
acceptance dtorily proces
schedule neication Testin
uality ControDOT survey
nd enhance tQC.
al
gations wereucture areas.is responsib
A) was condud the justificadesign reporubgrade thic
ment Phase
y prescriptiveams expresments, whichfuture proje
roposed and
quirements f
SMA on stru
on Phase
d documentasoils, etc., tops and area o
documentatissed at each
eeds to be accng and CDO
ol (QC) to uthub requirem
the QC mate
e conducted The prelimi
ble for any su
ucted by the ation for selerts were alsoknesses wer
ve requiremesed desire toh the RFP d
ects, try to anwill be acce
for temporary
uctures, iden
ation requireo allow for bor station-sp
ion requiremstage – mois
curate enougOT Audits.
ilize GPS/Uments, and i
erial testing r
in 2009 andinary reportsupplemental
RFP designecting concro prepared byre specified i
ents for subgo have more esign team hnticipate the eptable.
y pavements
ntifying wha
ement for thebetter QA andpecific check
ments to clearsture treat, R
gh to allow f
UTS survey teinclude subs
role to reduc
d 2010 for ses were provil investigatio
n team and a rete pavemeny the RFP dein the RFP.
grade and selflexibility s
had to reviewrange of opt
s.
at is expected
e different ad CDOT moklists.
rly define wR20, Base, et
for consisten
echnology instantial test s
ce the tempta
lected mainlided with theons to compl
report prepant for the USesign team a
lect materialo proposed w and decidetional subgr
d for bridge
areas and typonitoring. A
what areas havtc.
nt and proper
n place of sections.
ation of QA
14
line e lete
ared S 36 and
l R
e on ade
pes of few
ve
r
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
SecuringAs part ocommunprepared elementsenvironmCDOT’s 5 include
2. Back
The RFPcontractolists moreimplementhis resoua challen
3. The
RFP
Sev
Imple
NmSD
Esedth
TMwcoisisMso
SP
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
g the environof obtaining tity groups, san Environm, impacts, an
mental commcredibility i
ed the requir
kground/S
P included allor needs to tre than 100 spnted, the DBurce, keeping
nge.
Lessons
Developmen
ee items disvaluation cri
ementation/
Note about comeeting perfo
ometimes wDB contracto
Environmentaection whereesign packaghe EIS and R
The RFP stateManager.” It would be invoontractor has involved. Ts taking a ris
Manager’s inolidify this p
uggested lanroject Mana
es Project eport
nmental apprthe ROD in
state agenciemental Reevnd commitm
mitments, notis maintainedrements for e
Status
lowable imprack and propecific Mea
B Contractorg track of th
nt/Procurem
covered in citeria.
/Constructio
ontract requiormance stan
we will need tor room to be
al Compliane the contracge submittal
ROD each m
es the “The Cwas CDOT’olved with es limited the
There is no insk because covolvement. F
person’s role
nguage to adager shall lea
rovals for thi2009, many
es and the fedvaluation, wh
ments includet only for thed, allowing fenvironment
pacts for resoovide evidencsures to Min
r is required hese commitm
ment Phase
construction
on Phase
irements -- Rndards ratherto be prescrie innovative
nce Work Plactor’s Envirols have been
month.
Contractor s’s intention teverything the number of nvolvement ommitmentsFor future co
e on the cont
dd to the temad a cross dis
is project way commitmenderal governhich documeed in the ROe success of for approval tal and permi
ources such ace of compli
nimize Harmto employ anments in the
phase below
Remember inr than being iptive, howeand exceed
an and/or Quonmental Co
reviewed fo
shall employthat the conthat falls undeareas in whion noise, lan
s could be ovontracts, contractor’s team
mplate for futscipline envi
as a process tnts were madnment. In 20ented change
OD. It is vitalf this project, of future pritting on the
as wetlands iance with.
m. To help asn Environmfast-paced D
w that may im
n DB to fram prescriptive
ever in a perfour minimu
uality Assuraompliance Mor complianc
y and utilize tractor’s Enver the NEPAich the Envirndscape or wverlooked wnsider additim.
ture DB projironmental r
that took mode to local g11, the RFPes or refineml that the pro, but also to rojects. RFP e project.
and T&E spAppendix H
ssure these mmental Manag
Design Build
mpact conten
me the langue. It is a tougfect world w
um expectatio
ance ProcessManager repo
ce with the c
an Environmvironmental A umbrella. Ironmental Prwater quality
without the Enonal languag
jects: “The Ereview of all
ore than 10 ygovernments, design team
ments to the oject honor itassure that Book 2 Sec
pecies, whichH of the RODmeasures areger. Even wid environme
nt of RFP or
uage in termsgh balance.
we will give tons
s -- Add a orts on whichcommitments
mental ProjeProject ManIn practice, oroject Mana
y. The contranvironmentage in the RF
Environmentl major desig
15
years. ,
m
ts
tion
h the D
ith ent is
r
s of
the
h s on
ect nager our ager actor al P to
tal gn
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
susuthonM
T
Emtoexthd
Neninbondco
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ubmittals to ummary of the Environmn the Project
Manager morThe EnvconstrucenvironenvironThe conparticipDuring review omonthlyreview wManage The monnarrativwhich hinclude spills, scommunenvironarticles.
The Environm
Environmentamonitoring. To effectivelyxperience sohe back burno this and co
Noise (and otngineering dn a drainage een incompln their reporesign-build ontractor’s n
o Line-oreplac
es Project eport
confirm comthese cross d
mental Compt an Environre involved avironmental ction phasesmental lawsmental decis
ntractor’s Enpate as needeconstructionof the entire y update of thwith CDOT’er’s weekly f
nthly updateve of specialhave occurre
adjusting cotream diversnications. Tmental actio.
mental Mana
al QA – RevThe contracto monitor wa
o far is that thner. For futuronsider maki
ther disciplindisciplines, lireport. In no
lete or minimrt rather thansection, whinoise report w
of-sight analced or remov
mpliance witdiscipline revliance Work
nmental Manadd the folloManager sh
s to assure cos, permit requsion documenvironmentaed. n, the Enviroproject. A s
he Environm’s staff can bfield review.
e of the Envirl environmened during theonstruction asions, stakeh
The narrativeons on the pr
ager should b
view the QAor’s QA grou
ater quality ahe QA groupre projects, eing it part of
nes) – What ike drainageoise, the Conmal. Their strn complying ch is very gowhich may h
lysis for everved.
th all environviews shall bkplan. The Cnager. In ordowing languahall actively pompliance wuirements, a
ents. l Manager s
onmental Maummary of t
mental Compbe counted as
ronmental Cntal compliane reporting pactivities to aholder commes shall incluroject and to
be on the cri
A RFP requireup does not
and the rest op will let envemphasize thf the selectio
constitutes ae, the Contrantractor’s inirategy has bwith the req
ood. Additiohave to be sp
ry location w
nmental desibe included i
Concessionaider to get theage: participate
with contractand the comm
shall attend a
anager shallthe field revipliance Works a substitut
Compliance Wnce actions
period. Examavoid nestin
munications aude enough do serve as the
itical positio
ements for eseem to be s
of the envirovironmental he need for Qon criteria.
a complete “actor seems ditial and sub
been to rebutquests. CDOonal items thpelled out di
where existin
ign commitmin each montire shall empe contractor’s
in both the dt requiremenmitments ma
all public me
l conduct a wiews shall bek Plan. The mte for the Env
Work Plan sand environ
mples of thesng birds, respand regulatodetail fully de basis of rep
ons list.
environmentstaffed to theonmental req complianceQA to have s
“Report”? Indialed into wbsequent subt every comm
OT’s 2011 guhat should beirectly are:
ng mitigation
ments. A thly update o
ploy and utils Environme
design and nts, ade in the
eetings and
weekly field e included inmonthly fieldvironmental
shall includenmental activse activities ponding to fuory agency document theeports and
al compliance level neces
quirements. Oe issues slidesufficient sta
n some of thewhat is expecmittals have
ment and requidance has ae in the
n is being
16
of ize ental
n the d l
e a vities
fuel
e
ce ssary Our e to aff to
e cted e quest a
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Imshla
CseBacrep
Ndurearb
Wfefrocadan
Wdthgudfe2
W
Wcopr
Hifalli
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
o Identi
o Statemgeome
mportance ohould be conanguage in th
Construction eem to take f
Be aware thatccountable fequirements lays a role in
Noise during uring constrelocated, or rreas (hotels, arriers.
Wildlife Croseatures to mariendly. Specf putting ledapacity and mifficult gettinnimals in the
Wildlife Crosetails on thehe FHWA guuidance for irection the eatures are w.
Wildlife Cros
Wildlife Frienontractor warecedence.
Historical – df preservatiolter them unines will be d
es Project eport
ification of th
ment certifyietry of the D
f Noise Linenducted in evhe RFP.
Noise -- Thifull advantagt this can hapfor their comfor their No
n the implem
constructionruction in arereplaced. Aresidential a
ssings I – Beake the culvcifically, one
dges in abovemaintenanceng these featese locations
ssings II – O wildlife crouidance docuindividual ancontractor se
wanted in eac
ssings III—S
ndly Fencingas required to
ditches (evenn of the ditcless specificdisturbed un
he datum us
ing that geomDB project.
e-of-sight Anvery location
is is an area ge of the wigppen and co
mmitments inoise Control mentation of
n – Require eas where ex
Add languageareas, etc) un
e aware that erts carryinge of the irrige the ordinare. Since theirtures approvs.
On Phase 1, thossings, but fuments. Thenimal specieeems to expech crossing a
See note abo
g-- We did ho consult wi
n abandoned ch is implied cally prohibitnless specific
ed for all ele
metry in the
nalysis – As n where an e
where the cggle words (nsider strong
n this area. APlan that thethe plan.
Contractor txisting noise e to the Contnless the Co
the irrigationg their ditchegation compary high water approval o
ved. Conside
here is a havfor the remaie FHWA guies, but it doeect. For futuand call them
out shelves in
have a conflith had differ
ones) need in the gradi
ted. Assumecally prohibi
evations in th
submitted m
noted aboveexisting wall
ommitments(where practger language
Add languagee contractor’
to provide te barriers exitract limiting
ontractor prov
n companieses under the anies on the er mark. Theof the design er a parallel c
ve a hybrid oining detailsidance is gooes not providure projects, m out, simila
n Irrigation d
ict here wherrent opinion
to be fenceding plans, coe that any groited.
he submitted
model is the a
e, a Line-of-l is replaced
s of the contticable, whee to hold thee in the cont’s Public Inv
emporary noiist and are beg work at nigvides tempo
s may not achighway moproject obje
eir concern wis required,
crossing for
of calling ous the contracod for providde the type oCDOT shouar to what w
ditch box cu
re the two ens. Consider
d (similar to ontractors wiound within
d model.
approved
-sight review. Clarify this
tractor’s propere feasible, ee contractor tractor’s volvement T
ise protectioeing removeght in sensitiorary sound
ccept certainore wildlife ected to the iwas hydraulic
it could be small to me
ut some specictor is directeding general
of specific uld decide wh
was done on P
ulverts.
ntities that thgiving CPW
wetlands). Eill feel free tthe right-of
17
w s
posal etc).
eam
on ed, ive
dea c
edium
ific ed to l
hat Phase
he W
Even o
f-way
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Walmhd
Cexcocob
Rdrfu
QcoSw
Intellig
1. Ove
The purpelementsmaintenaproject’s Active T
The ITS Circuit T(MVRD)Road WeCounterscomponeEthernet
The ETCTransponRecognitStatus InETC field
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Water Qualitylways kept u
management ave to demoisturbance.
Consider Addxample, the ould also reqontractors metter and com
Require handrainage strucuture injurie
Quality Manaontractor’s Qection 17 ite
will put addit
igentTra
rview
pose of the In are to inform
ance and opefunding souraffic Manag
system incluTelevision (C), Travel Timeather Informs, and a Regeents that makswitches.
C system inclnders, Automtion (ALPR)dicator Beacd devices to
es Project eport
y – The contup. Considerreview. For
onstrate that t
ditional RequRFP could d
quest ARE emay see this ammit to addi
drails or othectures and bis.
agement—CQuality Manems into the tional eyes o
ansporta
ntelligent Trm the roadw
eration of theurces. RFP Bgement (AT
udes variousCCTV), Ramme Indicatorsmation Systeeneration Buke up the com
ludes additiomatic Vehicl) Cameras, Lcons. The ETthe ETC ba
tractor has exr using a mecexample, if they have in
uested Elemdescribe the elements thatas a relativeling these ele
er fall protectikeway cros
CDOT Environagement Pla
plan so the Qon some of th
ationSys
ransportationway users, coe facility, an
Book 2 SectioM) on the pr
s devices, sucmp Meter Sta
s (TTI), Autems (RWIS),uilding. In admmunication
onal items sue Identificat
Loop DetectoTC system wck-office.
xpended conchanism to lithe 34-acre
ncreased thei
ments (AREs)minimum ret would makly inexpensivements.
tion for CDOsings in the
onmental Staan. This is thQA staff wilhe areas on c
stemand
n System (ITollect variousnd to collect ton 19 includroject.
ch as Variabations (RMS)tomatic Traff, Bus on Shoddition, the In system, su
uch as Variabtion (AVI) Rors, Lane Cowill rely on th
nsiderable reink acreage limit is surp
ir resources t
) for environequirements ke it a better ve way to m
OT maintenaRFP langua
aff should rehe opportunitll have themconcern duri
dElectro
TS) and Elecs data to assithe tolling re
ded the requi
ble Message ), Microwav
ffic Recorderoulders (BOITS system i
uch as condu
able Toll MeReaders, Autontroller Cabhe communi
esources but disturbed w
passed, the coto match the
nmental elemfor a wildlifcrossing. Bi
make their pro
ance works age to elimin
eview the firty to get man
m on their cheing construct
onicToll
tronic Toll Cist agencies evenue to suirements for
Signs (VMSve Vehicle Rrs (ATR), DoS), Bicycle aincludes the it, fiber opti
ssage Signs tomatic Licenbinets, and Tications netw
still has notwith a higher-
ontractor woe area of
ments – For fe crossing, bidding oposals look
at all large nate potential
rst draft of thny Section 5ecklists. Thition.
Collectio
Collection (Ein the
upport the r ITS, ETC, a
S), Closed Radar Detecti
oppler Radaand Pedestrivarious c cable, and
(VTMS), nse Plate
Transaction work to link
18
t -level ould
but it
k
l for
he 5 and s
on
ETC)
and
ion ar, ian
the
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
2. Back
The US 3separatedof Operathe perspguide for
Late in thexpandedframewo
To date, house fibCDOT he
A numbeuse and pproject.
3. The
RFP
Uteeq
Dapea
IT
Ifto
Imple
IT
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
kground/S
36 Project wd managed lations was pr
pective of ther the design,
he RFP deved on via adderk of an ATM
the extent ofber optic wireadquarters
er of ATM syplanned oper
Lessons
Developmen
Use performaechnology, equipment un
Define what Ipproval requach minor el
TS Design an
o Includ
o Includline-o
o Includcontrathat sh
f CDOT/RTDo the Contrac
ementation/
TS Design an
es Project eport
Status
was to be the ane concept.repared whice operator, Cimplementa
elopment phaendum durinM system in
f ITS construre that make in Denver an
ystem featurration of this
nt/Procurem
ance-based respecially onnless includin
ITS elementuirement tranlement.
nd Submitta
de RFP requ
de RFP requf-sight and s
de a more deactor to creathows when t
D preferred ctor with con
/Constructio
nd Submitta
first project . As a part ofch described CDOT, HPTEation, and op
ase, ATM elng the procurncluded in th
uction on theup the ITS bnd will prov
res and enhas system has
ment Phase
equirementsn multi-year ng “or appro
ts require revnsfers risk to
als:
irement to sh
irements forspacing.
etailed ITS dte a list of mthe deliverab
vendor pricintact inform
on Phase
als:
in Coloradof the early dthe characte
E, and the usperation of th
lements wererement phas
he project’s B
e project invbackbone. Thvide commun
ancements ha been develo
s for any ITSprojects. Do
oved equival
view and who CDOT and
how utilities
r deliverable
deliverables lmilestone datbles will be s
ing is availabmation.
o to plan anddesign and RFeristics of thser. It servedhe US 36 ma
e added to thse. The intenBasic Config
volves installhis backbonnication and
ave been addoped during
S elements do not specifylent” languag
hat elements d requires sig
s on ITS plan
s that show
list in the RFes within a csubmitted.
ble for ITS e
d implement FP developm
he managed ld as a high-lanaged lane
he RFP, whint was to get guration.
lation of conne will run fr
controls for
ded via chanthe first two
due to rapidlyy specific moge.
require accegnificant staf
ns.
Camera and
FP, and requcertain timef
elements, pro
a buffer-ment, a Conclane system level concepsystem.
ich were a basic
nduit that wirom Boulderr US-36 and
nge order as to years of the
y changing odel number
eptance. Blanff time to rev
d ATM gantr
uire the frame of NT
ovide this op
19
cept from tual
ill r to I-25.
the e
s or
nket view
ry
TP
ption
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
IT
Eisinm
Rbchtib
In
E(i
M
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
o Enforconsisdiscip
TS Submitta
o Enforwork
o Ensurfollow
Enforce the us installed. Tntrusion of w
microduct and
Require detaiegins (includhecklists weime they wereen installed
nclude/enfor
Enforce that Qincluding the
Maintaining E
o Includcontra
es Project eport
ce cross-discstently consiplines.
als and Paym
ce the submbegins (inclu
re that the cowing areas of
ProcuremeSMVMS, schedule if
Installationand deviceof time. Fthan segm
Integrationintegrationdifferent poverlookedacceptance
Maintain Eout separaincrementathe contracwith the pe
Software –
use of watertThe plugs thwater, soil, dd/or cabling
iled quality cding the und
ere created tore updated wd with compo
rce ITS expe
QA establishe undergroun
Existing/Tem
de timeframeactor plans to
ciplinary revider ITS, and
ment:
ission of a duding the un
ontractors prof work:
ent (MaterialLUS, have af this is brok
n – Best to se installation
For the devicment of roadw
n – Once even into the conpeople than td by the cone test period
Existing/Temately from theally over thector wants toermanent co
– Any softwa
ight conduitat twist to seebris, rodent.
control checkderground coo meet projecwith approprionents that w
erience requi
hes the ITS hnd conduit a
mporary Dev
e requiremeno do to fix it
views for ITSd the ITS pla
detailed ITS cnderground c
ogress paym
ls on Hand)a high materken out separ
separate undn since they aces, it may beway.
erything is inntrol systemthe installationtractor on ths are shown
mporary Deve permanente life of the po be paid foronstruction it
are modifica
t plugs that aeal with a rubts, etc… that
klists to be conduit and puct requiremeiate detail a were not in c
irements for
hold points pand pull box
vices
nt for respont), and timefr
S design. Oans consisten
constructionconduit and p
ment schedul
– ITS devicrial cost and rately
derground infare typicallye better to br
nstalled, the m is typically
on. This itemhe schedule. on the sched
vices – Ensut constructioproject. It car, but it is vetems.
ations (e.g. F
are to be instubber gasket t will later c
created for ITull box infraents and starlarge portioncompliance w
QA inspecto
prior to any Iinfrastructur
nse to issues frame require
Other disciplintly had con
n schedule bepull box infr
e distinctly b
ces, particulait is easier f
frastructure, y separated break up type
configuratioy a large effom is usually Verify thatdule.
ure that this ion, so it can ban be a signiery complica
FLIR, CTMS
talled as soonare reusable
cause issues w
TS before anastructure). Prt construction of the condwith the con
ors
ITS construcre).
that come uement for re
ines did not nflicts with o
efore any ITrastructure).
breaks out th
arly VMS, for progressin
poles/suppoby large perie of device ra
on of deviceort and by y underbid ant all the
item is brokebe paid for ificant effort
ated to includ
S etc..)
n as the cone and prevenwith pulling
ny ITS workPreliminary on, but by thduit system h
ntract.
ction beginn
up (what the solving the i
20
ther
TS
he
ng a
orts, ods ather
es and
nd
en
t that de it
duit nt g
k
he had
ning
issue
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
DdClopu
Lands
1. Ove
LandscapThe LandremovalsBook 2 S
The Landhealth, anor replacproject.
2. Back
Many difacquired specific fplanted, aothers (su
3. The
RFP
See itevalu
Imple
Tlaeacothar
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
o Includrequir
Drawings shaata points –
Contractors aocations of full box and m
scapinga
rview
ping on the pdscaping Plas, and replacSection 17 in
dscape Plan nd a recommement. The
kground/S
fferent typesproject ROW
formal landsand irrigateduch as Westm
Lessons
Developmen
tems discoveuation criteri
ementation/
The contract andscape plaarthwork wiould be preshe contract mre approved.
es Project eport
de $ penalty rements are w
all clearly dethey shall no
are very relucfinal infrastrumanhole loc
andIrrig
project involan includes thements of Pr
ncluded the r
documents amendation focontractor is
Status
s of landscapW, such as nscaped areas d areas. Formminster, Bro
nt/Procurem
ered in consta.
/Constructio
states that tran is acceptell start long erved are vu
mark good sp.
for not meetworthless)
efine ITS infot be concepctant to updaucture (deviccations, later
gation
lves replacinhe areas to broject-impacrequirements
all vegetatioor remaining s responsible
ping and vegnative seed a
at selected bmal landscapoomfield, or
ment Phase
truction pha
on Phase
rees that are d.” (Book 2,before they
ulnerable durpecimen tree
ting timefram
frastructure lptual in naturate these place locations,als, etc).
ng plant matebe final seedcted trees, shs for landsca
n locations aundisturbed
e for comple
getation wereareas, informbridges, and
pe areas withInterlocken)
ase below tha
not to be im, Section 17.submit a lanring this peries early, pref
me requirem
locations onre. During t
ans to reflect, fiber alignm
erial in all dided; and the lhrubs, landscaping on the
and identified areas, pruneting all land
e present witmal “volunteed significant hin CDOT R).
at may impa
mpacted will b.2.2) In the d
ndscape planiod. There shferably right
ments (withou
the plans, inthe as-built pt actual condment, fiber s
isturbed arealocations, mcapes and irrproject.
es species, coning, removadscaping nee
thin the exister” trees andareas of form
ROW are mai
act content of
be marked “design build n. Subsequenhould be somt after the fir
ut teeth, the
ncluding survprocess, ditions and splice locatio
as on the Promitigations,
rigation. RFP
ondition, sizal, transplanteded on the
ting and d shrubs, sitemal sodded, intained by
f RFP or
“after the d environmenntly, trees thame mechanisrst grading p
21
vey
ons,
oject.
P
ze, ting,
e
nt at sm in lans
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Thfothsum
RfifoT
Cthad
RarmCtyir
Maint
1. Ove
Maintenaroadway roadside
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
The EIS requave to stay oor planting ahe language urrounding o
maintenance.
RFP Clarificairst plan docuormally land
The second p
Consider defihe design-buddressing ea
o Area Tbe revanticip
o Area TadjoinlandscArea Tand ir
o Area Tland hmaintlandownecess
Require Contreas where e
maintaining iContractor toypically not prrigation syst
tenanceD
rview
ance During in a safe confeatures suc
es Project eport
uired a 1 for on CDOT ROall of the replthat will steeopen space la
ations: In subuments exist
dscaped arealan is the pla
ining the threuild project fach is lumpedType 1: Arevegetated witpated. Type 2: Areaning landowncape. These Type 1. The rrigation systType 3: Areahad been formained as Arewners irrigatsary to repai
tractor to maeither CDOTrrigation dur hand water provided. Ptem during C
DuringC
Constructiondition for th
ch as signs an
1 tree mitigaOW, since thlacements. Wer the contraands where t
bsection 17.ting conditios, and identianting plan f
ee specific Cfootprint. (Thd together.)eas within thth the typica
as within theners have a fareas are oftcontractor w
tem in kind.as of new ROmally landscea Type 1. Intion system,ir adjust syst
aintain irrigaT, local entityring the longexisting veg
Potentially adConstruction
Construc
on consists ohe traveling nd guardrail
ation commihere will notWhile alloweactor to plantthe local gov
1.1, split reqons. It will inify any landsfor the new p
Categories ofhese were in
he CDOT ROal CDOT low
e CDOT ROformal agreeten irrigated will be requi
OW acquisitcape and irrin these areas the contracttem so it fun
ation during ty, or RTD lag constructiogetation is nodd a liquidatn.
ction
f maintaininpublic. This, keeping d
itment whicht always be sed as an optit a percentagvernments w
quirement innclude the trscape featureproject.
f landscape n the contrac
OW (both exw maintenan
OW where thement with Cand landsca
ired to replac
tion for the pigated, but ins, if the projetor is require
nctions for th
the Construcandscaping don period (mot effective ated damage f
ng the existinis includes ndrainage inlet
h is very harsuitable/sustion, considerge of the mit
will take over
nto two Landree inventoryes and areas
areas (Area t, however t
xisting and nnce plantings
he local goveCDOT to maaped at a higce any distur
project whern the future wect impacts ted to performhe adjoining
ction period.died due to C
multiple yearsand documefor not main
ng roadway anot only the pts clean and
d to meet if tainable locar strengthenitigation treesr the
dscape Plansy, identify thto be preser
Types) withthe language
new) that ares. No irrigati
ernment or aintain the gher level tharbed landsca
re the acquirwill be the adjoiningm the work landowner.
. NumerousContractor nos). Option fntation is
ntaining the
and temporapavement, bufunctional,
22
you ations ing s on
. The he rved.
hin e
e to ion is
an aping
red
g
s ot
for
ary ut and
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
evaluatinrequirem
2. Back
Maintenaongoing
3. The
RFP
Ete
In
C
SS
Lm
Rsu
Imple
Maint
1. Ove
RFP BooSafe and to one ofworkers a
2. Back
The contsequence
1. Pco
2. S3. S
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ng and makinments for mai
kground/S
ance activitieas problems
Lessons
Developmen
Enhance and emporary co
nclude timet
Clearly identi
pecify acceppecifically s
Limit the amominimize traf
Require the Cubmit a log t
ementation/
tenanceo
rview
ok 2 Section efficient Ma
f the goals ofand traveling
kground/S
ractor’s MOe, with nume
lace temporaonstruct EB hift EB traffhift WB traf
es Project eport
ng repairs tointenance du
Status
es such as re arise.
nt/Procurem
modify the cnditions.
ables for rep
ify the limits
ptable timelisidewalks an
ount of crossffic weaving
Contractor toto CDOT we
/Constructio
ofTraffic
16 includedaintenance of the project:g public.”
Status
OT phasing serous sub-ph
ary pavemenpermanent p
fic to new EBffic to new m
bridges anduring constru
epairing poth
ment Phase
current Leve
pairs in RFP
s of mainten
ines for tempnd length of d
sovers/phaseg and paveme
o identify andeekly.
on Phase
c(MOT)
d the requiremof Traffic is i: “Minimize
cheme in gehases:
nt widening pavement. B pavement,
middle portio
d structures.uction on the
holes and rep
el of Service
and contrac
nance respon
porary pavemdetours.
es/traffic reaent scarring.
d track main
ments for Mimportant toinconvenien
eneral was ba
in WB direc
, construct mon, complete
RFP Book 2e project.
pairing conc
e survey to m
ct.
nsibility- top
ments and al
alignments to.
ntenance dur
Maintenance oo CDOT and nce to the pu
ased on a thr
ction, shift tr
middle portioe WB perma
2 Section 18
crete barriers
make it appli
of ramps, cr
lignments, an
o maximize w
ring construc
of Traffic ond other stakehublic and ma
ree phase co
raffic to WB
on and mediaanent paveme
included the
s have been
cable for
ross roads, e
nd closures.
works zones
ction items a
n the project.holders, and aximize safe
onstruction
B side, and
an ent
23
e
etc.
s and
and
. ties ty of
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
3. The
RFP
PcothcoC
PLaflaP
Em(bpitRQ
Rlarew
D
Parbrpor
TorravmTth
Ptetem
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Lessons
Developmen
rovide strictontractor wihe week. Theonsequence,
Control Subc
rovide languLevel 2 MOTffect the Conanguage statierhaps liqua
Establish a prmake it very cblunt ends, moor shouldert be submitte
Require a safQA, and CDO
Require that tanguage in thequires that g
we need glare
Define MOT
er the CDOTre within 4’ ridge piers, ermanent bar temporary
This project Rr at .5-mile samp gore to ery clear on
midpoint to mThis needs tohe Contactor
rovide strictemporary paemporary ma
month.
es Project eport
nt/Procurem
ter language ll tend to repey use “blan, the travelinontractor can
uage in the cT NCs (missintractor’s pring that the N
ated damages
rocess for saclear in the R
missing delinring, etc). Reed to and accfe to open waOT in Book
the Contracthe contract fglare screense screens thr
clear zone in
T specificatiof the centerstockpiles, e
arrier. Definebarrier.
RFP states, “spacing, whiramp gore inwhere to me
midpoint? Is be clarified
r to be able t
ter requiremevement markarkings were
ment Phase
in the contraport numerou
nket” closureng public tennnot plan fo
contract that ing signs, dirroduction so NC-2 will bes should be i
afely openingRFP. Avoid neators, poorequire a safecepted by CDalk that shall2 Section 16
tor assess glafor determinis only need troughout the
n the RFP u
ions, the Conr of the barri
etc.). Providee the require
“Emergency ichever is lesn the same deasure emergit from the e
d in the contrto fit emerge
ents (applicakings in the e initially pla
act with regaus closures t
es to make upnds to take la
r anticipated
provides morty barrels, dthey tend toe elevated toincurred if th
g new segmeopening a n
r striping, une-to-open chDOT prior tol be attended6 RFP langua
are screens thing where glto be assesse corridor for
sing AASHT
ntractor is reier. Define ae details on hements when
pullouts shass. Interchan
direction of tgency pull-oendpoint of tract languageency pullouts
ation rates, mRFP. The pr
aced instead
ards to the Lthat they donp for their in
ane closures d closures.
ore teeth witdelineators, co take their tio an NC-1 ifhe NC-2 is n
ents of roadwnew section onsafe roadwa
hecklist for bo opening and by represenage.
hroughout thlare screens ed at cross-or vertical pro
TO guidance
equired to pinan obstructiohow to conn
n temporary b
all be providnge distance travel.” Thisout to emergthe first to the and some ws properly.
mil thicknessroject would
d of having th
Lane Closuren’t end up usnternal plannless seriousl
th level 2 MOconflicting sime fixing thf not addressnot fixed in a
way to the trof roadway way transition
both QA/QC ny mainline tntatives from
he project. Pare needed.
overs, but weofile related
e.
n barrier whon in the connect temporabarrier overl
ded between shall be me
s language dogency pullouthe starting powiggle room
s, bead gradad be better sehe Contracto
e Report. A sing throughning issues. Aly and the Tr
OT NC/NCRsigns, etc.) dhe issue. Persed in a weeka certain tim
raveling pubwith safety ins, poor light
and require traffic switch
m the Contra
Provide detaiThis project
e have foundissues.
here obstructntract (drop-oary barrier wlaps perman
each interchasured fromoes not makt. Is from oint of the n
m is needed f
ations, etc.) erved if the gor refresh on
24
hout As a raffic
R’s. do not rhaps k.
me.
lic, ssues ting that hes.
actor,
iled t d that
tions off, ith
nent
hange m
e it
next? for
for good
nce a
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Pp
R
Imple
Aafsu
Mfacoavst
Cthonw
Wmoth
Ecla
Tte7
P
Ind
Cre
PthmmE
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
rovide a meavement (e.g
Require that T
ementation/
Add requiremfter notificatubcontractor
More coordinaces i.e. direoordination vailable per tandardized
Contractor rehe contractorn site within
what is expec
Working Timmake it clear
f time. The chey can get o
Ensure that allearly defineLane Closur
Temporary Temporary sig2-hours of fi
lace some fo
nclude detailistinction of
Clarify requirelocation of
erhaps requihe project en
member of thmodified throEngineers, QA
es Project eport
asurable smog. 3/8” with
Temporary L
/Constructio
ment for Contion by CDOr had to orde
nation with Cction of travshould identsign. This inform for the
sponse timer for this? Ren thirty minucted.
me Violation to the contra
contractor isoff the road p
ll sections ofed including re Strategy,
raffic Controgn stand. Recfirst use if the
orm of limit
led requiremf task specifi
rements for texisting sign
ire that a wengineer on tohe Contractoroughout the pA, QC, etc.
oothness reqa 4’ straight
Lighting Plan
on Phase
ntractor to repOT or QA, toer a sign or s
CTMC for lovel affected,tify panel siznformation se contractor t
: make sure ecommend m
utes, not just
Incidents - Aactor that CDs responsibleprior to the e
f roadway, inallowable titake time be
ol Devices -commend cley are not re
construction
ments for trafc vs. project
temporary cons, new cons
eekly MOT sop of the sectrs Staff comproject based
quirement fot edge).
ns are shown
pair or instalo avoid delaytand or was
ocations of Dwithin and aze, number oshould be incto complete
that this langmaking it cle“respond to
Always stricDOT will noe for managinestablished t
ncluding ramimes for closefore release
- Specify holarifying thatemoved daily
n access poin
ffic control it wide.
onditions – dstruction sign
safety inspection 630.11 r
mpletes this red off of inpu
or pavement
n on the MO
ll signs withys in correctinot actively
DMS panels,approaching of lines and ncluded in theand send to
guage is cleaear that the c
o an incident
ctly enforce wot tolerate viong their wortimes.
mps or sectiosures. If these of the RFP
ow long a pet signs be pey.
nts as approp
inspection- Q
distance fromns, exit sign
ction report arequirementeport. Deveut from the M
transitions o
OT plans.
hin a specifieing issues be
y working on
, including dg the project number of ce RFP, incluCTMC for u
ar. What is econtractor wwithin 30 m
working timolations regark and timing
ons betweense areas are nto come up
rmanent signermanently m
priate.
QA and QC-
m traveled wns, etc.
and/checklists. Ensure thelop a templaMOT design
on temp
ed time perioecause a n the Project
direction signlimits. This haracters
uding a use of signs.
expected frowill have somminutes" if th
me violations ardless of leng the work s
n highways anot spelled owith times.
n can be on mounted wit
with clear
way for
st is submittehat a qualifieate that can ber, CDOT
25
od
.
n
om meone hat is
and ngth
so
are out in
a thin
ed to d be
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Modifi
1. Ove
RFP Booand BridgDivision 200 throuapplicablbuild pro
2. Back
StandardRFP, simthe procu
3. The
RFP
Bsu
Bonot
OPhysp
Csp
Partne
1. Ove
The RFP
2. Back
A formalformal se
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
fications
rview
ok 2 Section ge Construct100 of the S
ugh 700 of thle to the Projojects.
kground/S
d Special Promilar to typicurement phas
Lessons
Developmen
Be cautious wuperseded or
Be very specinly changingther provisio
Only include rovisions in ydraulics, ITpecial provis
Come up withpecified in 6
erCoord
rview
P included CD
kground/S
l Partnering essions have
es Project eport
toStand
20 set forth tion for desi
Standard Spehe Standard ject. This se
Status
ovisions applal CDOT prse.
nt/Procurem
when modifyr replaced by
ific on what g a small porons of the sp
minor modiBook 2 Sec
TS, etc.) shousions in Sect
h a reasonab626 may not
dination
DOT’s Stand
Status
Session was been condu
dardSpe
modificatioign-build proecifications. Specificatioction was ge
licable to therojects. Upda
ment Phase
ying standardy the modific
is changing rtion of the S
pec section st
ifications to ction 20. All uld be includtion 19)
ble plan for hbe adequate
(CDOTa
dard Special
s conducted bucted since th
ecificatio
ns to the CDojects. The fiThe second
ons, as well aenerally cons
e project werated SSP’s a
d special procation, only
in the 100 sStandard Sptill apply.
Standard SpProject Specded in these
how to handle.
andCont
l Provision f
by the contrahen.
ons
DOT Standarfirst section c
section contas Standard sistent with
re selected das appropriat
ovisions so ththe intended
section of Boecification (
pecifications cial Provisiospecific sec
le mobilizati
tractor)
for Partnerin
actor at the b
rd Specificatcontained revtained revisiSpecial Provprevious CD
during the prte were via a
hat the entird text.
ook 2 Sectio(i.e. spec boo
and Standarons (e.g. for ctions of the
ion. Mobiliz
ng, dated Feb
beginning of
tion for Roavisions to ions to Divisvisions DOT design-
reparation ofaddendum du
e section is n
n 20. If you ok), state tha
rd Special bridge, RFP (e.g. IT
zation as
bruary 3, 201
f project. No
26
d
sions
-
f the uring
not
are at all
TS
11.
o
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
3. The
Efoloco
Pst
Plo
Ifnrew
Pmar
Rco
Projec
1. Ove
RFP Booproject. TProject S
2. Back
The ContRevised IScheduleand the T
3. The
RFP
ClamC
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Lessons
Establish partollow it on booking for anounterparts u
artnering ladtaff.
artnering apowest level p
f an issue canext level on elationships.
written summ
artnering semaintains goorises.
Remind staff onflicts, etc)
ctContro
rview
ok 2 Section The requiremSchedules, R
kground/S
tractor has sInitial Sched
es are the basTIFIA report
Lessons
Developmen
Cost loading anguage in th
minimum. ThContractors w
es Project eport
tnering laddeboth CDOT any available unless there
dder should
pproach shoupossible.
n’t be resolvthe partnerin In order for
mary of the is
ssions/activiod communi
to always fo) that are con
ols/Sched
2 included tments covere
Reporting to T
Status
ubmitted a Pdules, Monthsis for creatit.
nt/Procurem
all schedulehe RFP that his will allowwill load thei
er/counterpaand Contractbody to resoare absolute
include all l
uld encourag
ved at a loweng ladder to r the next levssue may be
ities should cication chann
ocus on the sntributing to
duling
the requiremed managemTIFIA, and o
Preliminary Ihly progress ing the Mont
ment Phase
s to Level Vrequires all
w the Projectir schedule to
arts at beginntor sides. Diolve issues –ely no other
evels from P
ge staff to res
er level, it shavoid delay
vel to fully uhelpful to p
continue thronels among P
specific issuethe inability
ments for Projment of the Pr
other Project
Initial Schedschedules an
thly Invoice
VI was not clschedules tot’s progress o Level VI t
ning of Projeiscourage sta– staff shouldoptions.
Project Direc
solve issues
hould be escays to the Projunderstand thprovide.
oughout the Project parti
e, not other y for the part
oject Controlroject Invoict Manageme
dule, an Origand Current I
as well as th
learly requireo be Cost Loto be trackedtypically for
ect and requaff on both sd always wo
ctor to desig
with their co
alated immeject and damhe issue, a p
life of the Picipants if a
aspects (perticipants to r
ls and Schedces, management tasks.
ginal Initial SInitial Schedhe Monthly
ed in the RFoaded to leved much mortheir own co
uire staff to sides from ork through
gn and inspec
ounterparts a
ediately to thmage to work
osition pape
Project. Thisfuture issue
sonality resolve the i
duling on thement of the
Schedule, sedules. The Progress rep
FP. Include el VI at a re accuratelyost projectio
27
ction
at the
he king er or
s
ssue.
e
everal
port
y. ons
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
anlo
Inmco
SacanV
Imple
Mhsuim
Tacthti(a
Ttosc
Fco
Vre
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
nd tracking, oaded to this
nclude additimore effectivontractor nee
trengthen thccurate weeknticipated qu
Verification T
ementation/
Meeting the melpful to meubmission. Wmpact on the
The Contractoctivities. Thihe RFP. It wies back to thaudits, owne
The Scheduleo build the Pchedule.
or any itemsompensation
Verify that thealistic. Thi
es Project eport
therefore is s level.
ional requireve schedule meds to submi
he language rkly look-aheuantities. ThTesting prog
/Constructio
monthly invoet with the C
When the Coe review time
or uses a 3 wis Schedule
would be helphe Project Scer’s verificati
e is required Project. Do n
s that the Con, a specific
he Contractors includes C
not unreaso
ements in themanagementit recovery s
regarding theead schedulehis schedule gram and to p
on Phase
oice due dateContractor prontractor is ce for CDOT
week or a 5 wis not tied to
pful if contrachedule and ion testing (O
to be an accnot allow am
ontractor inteactivity mus
r’s schedule CLOMR, Dit
onable to requ
e RFP for ret, especially schedules.
e requiremene based off th
is critical foplan audits.
e has been arior to NTP
continuouslyand subsequ
week scheduo the Project actor is requiis accurate tOVT), and i
curate represmbiguous or u
ends to seek st be include
durations fotch Compani
quest the sche
esource loadiif schedule b
nt for the Cohe current inor CDOT to
a challenge foto discuss a
y late with thuent submis
ule to plan neSchedule an
ired to showto aid in CDindependent
sentation of hunclear activ
Stockpiled Med in the Sch
or permit appies, etc.
edule submi
ing, which wbecomes a c
ontractor to pnitial schedulmanage the
for the contrarealistic mo
he invoice it sion to FHW
ear term connd it is not a
w how the 3 wDOT staff res
assurance te
how the Convities to rem
Materials/Prhedule for ea
provals is ac
itted to CDO
would allow concern or
provide an le with Owner’s
actor. Wouldonthly date fohas a negati
WA, TIFIA, e
nstruction a requiremenweek schedusource plannesting (IAT)
ntractor intenmain in the
rocurement ach item.
ccurate and
28
OT be
for
d be for ive etc.
nt in ule ing
)).
nds
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Projec
1. Ove
RFP Booprocess fBook 1.
2. Back
The US 3conditionand as poproceedechange oelementsAs a resuproject.
3. The
RFP
SCre
Sfo
Rw
Rgpr
Inrebcoprthwth
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ct/Contra
rview
ok 2 Section for requestin
kground/S
36 Phase 1 pn of obtaininotential owneed, a portion order. In addi (such as enh
ult, there hav
Lessons
Developmen
pecify ContrCDOT standaegulations.
pecify that Cor easy comp
Remember towriting techn
Require firm iving proposracticable” o
n order for thegulations, aetween CDOonstruction oroject scopehe local agen
with this apprhe project.
es Project eport
actMana
2 included tng, processin
Status
program budng the TIFIAer-risk itemsof the continition, the lochanced struc
ve been many
nt/Procurem
ractor mark-ard practice.
Contractor Cparison to CD
o be prescripical requirem
commitmensal points foror “when po
he project toan IntergoverOT and all loof the projec. This docum
ncies to controach is iden
agemen
the requiremng, and execu
get includedA loan for a ps were eliminngency was cal agencies cture aesthety change ord
ment Phase
-up on Chan This needs
Change estimDOT cost da
tive only whments.
nts from the Cr commitmessible”. The
o remain in crnmental Agocal agenciesct to accommment shall idtribute to thentifying the l
t
ments for Projuting change
d an approximportion of thenated or mitallowed to balong the co
tics) throughders requeste
ge Orders into be clearly
mates shall beata books.
hen needed a
Contractor inents or accepse are not en
compliance wgreement tems prior to the
modate any pdentify a bude project for local enhanc
oject Managee orders on th
mate 6% cone project. Ontigated as debe used to adorridor electeh CDOT and ed by CDOT
n Contract bay defined an
e submitted
and focus on
n managemepting plans wnforceable co
with the Statmplate shall be commencinpotential locadget cap andthese enhan
cements duri
ement on thehe project w
ntingency tonce the projesign and condd elements ed to fund cethe change
T to add elem
ased on valund in accorda
in CDOT st
n performanc
ent plans andwith qualifierontractually
te Controllerbe created anng the designal enhancemd payment mcements. Thing the procu
e project. Thwas defined i
o be set asideect was procnstruction of work via ertain additioorder proces
ments to the
ue of CO or ance with FH
andard form
ce criteria in
d RFP. Avoirs such as “w.
r’s procuremnd executedn and
ments to the mechanisms fhe challengeurement pha
29
he n
e as a cured
onal ss.
HWA
mat
n
id when
ment d
for e ase of
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Imple
Mpris
Vph
HbrefC
PIGinearemfa
Rtypre
RrearC
Ure
Mu
Dstpr
Accep
Ba
Dmau
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ementation/
Managing conrocess and ns expected th
Verify that thhase.
Having a weering up and ffectiveness
Contractor – P
rior to execuGA will neednstructions). ach enhanceequired, this
make sure allashion.
Request for Cypical sectioossible (i.e. equired to de
Require stricteview/responre completed
Contractor to
Utilize a trackesult in futur
Maintaining aseful for staf
Developing staff during throject manag
ptance/Com
Begin acceptacommon un
Develop a memeet FHWA uditing appr
es Project eport
/Constructio
ntract changnegotiate. Alhat excess pr
he Contractor
ekly project mresolve issue: CDOT – PrProject Man
ution of any d to be execu This may b
ement. Due tapproach w
l approvals (
Change Propns/details rabikeway sigevelop ROM
t conformancnse times ond in a timely use change
king log to mre change req
an updated Pff as they co
tandard besthe life of thegement perfo
mpletion Pha
ance discussnderstanding
ethod to valirequirement
roach (check
on Phase
ges requires allocate approroject funds w
r is followin
managemenes. Participaroject Direct
nager, Constr
change ordeuted by both
be completedto the nature
will need to bi.e. City Cou
osals shouldather than fulgnage). ThisM estimates.
ce with the Cn all change ry fashion. N
orders as an
monitor all pquests.
Project Manaome and go f
t managemene Project. Thformance ove
ase
sions early ing of requirem
idate the Quats for accept
king a percen
a significantopriate staff rwill be avail
ng the as-buil
nt meeting wants should btor, Design Mruction Man
ers for local h CDOT andd via an optie of design-bbe vetted withuncils or Sta
d include direll design pacs would decr
Contract requrequests andot following
n excuse for
potential Proj
agement Planfrom the Proj
nt processeshis allows Cer the life of
n Project witments and exp
ality Assuranance early in
ntage of the d
t amount of sresources tolable to fund
lt process th
with the Contrbe limited to Manager, Co
nager, and De
enhancemend the local agon letter wit
build projecth both CDO
ate Controlle
ection to theckages for Rrease the leve
quirements fod directive leg these requiother delays
ject issues, i
n and the asject to give t
and proceduCDOT to perff the Project.
th the Contrapectations.
nce data devn the Projectdocuments)
staff time to o this activityd additional
hroughout the
tractor is an ethe followin
onstruction Mesign Manag
nts, an amengency (per Sth a proposedts and the qu
OT and the loer) can be ma
e Contractor ROM estimat
el effort (bot
or content anetters so that irements allos in completi
including tho
sociated Risthem history
ures is usefuform self-au.
actor, so that
veloped on tht. Recommeto validate t
track, prepay, especially elements.
e Constructi
effective wang to maintaManager; ger.
ndment to thetate Controld cap amoun
uick decisionocal agenciesade in a time
to develop tes where th time and c
nd these chang
ows the ing the Proje
ose that may
sk Matrix is y on the proj
ul for the CDudits and imp
t all parties h
he Project toend using anthe data. Thi
30
are, if it
ion
ay to ain
e ler’s nt for ns s to ely
cost)
ges
ect.
y
ect.
DOT prove
have
o n is
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
caC
Procu
1. Ove
The Desifollowing
M
M
A
S
O
Ja
F
The RFPbuild pro
B
B
B
B
R
The ITP instructioselection
2. Back
The US 3Price, Bein the GMany Addiwithin thFederal athe propobridges w
Certain pValue sel
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
an be time cCDOT staff i
rement/
rview
ign-Build Prg key elemen
March-April
May-July 201
August-Septe
eptember 29
October 2011
anuary 27, 2
ebruary 29,
P included thojects:
Book 1 – Con
Book 2 – Tec
Book 3 – App
Book 4 - Con
Reference Do
issued with ons for propon teams.
kground/S
36 Phase 1 pest-Value SeMP was the “itional Requ
he GMP. Theand the Interosals, ranginwhich were p
proposal elemlection were
es Project eport
onsuming ans leaving for
/Evaluat
rocurement pnts and mile
2011 – Lette
11 – RFQ iss
ember 2011 –
9, 2011 – Iss
1-January 20
2012 – Propo
2012 – Cont
e following
ntract
chnical Requ
plicable Stan
ntract Drawi
ocuments (fo
the RFP incosal preparat
Status
project evalulection”. Th“Basic Conf
uested Elemee Basic Confrlocken Loopng from extenpinch points,
ments were ee based on th
nd difficult tr other Proje
tion/Sele
process utilizestones:
er of Interest
suance, SOQ
– Issue Draf
sue RFP to p
012 – 1 on 1
osals Submit
tractor Selec
standard com
uirements
ndards, Data
ings
or informatio
luded informtion and sub
uation and see GMP state
figuration” oents (ARE) ofiguration prp interchangension of the , and upgrad
evaluated onhe Technical
to complete ects.
ectionPh
zed on the U
t request, me
Q submittals,
ft RFP for in
proposers
meetings, R
tted
cted
mponents us
a, and Report
on only)
mation aboutbmission, and
election was ed in the ITPof the projector portions orimarily conse. Five AREmainline fur
ding amenitie
n a pass/fail bProposal ele
at later stage
hase
US 36 Phase
eeting, and s
, SOQ evalu
nternal review
RFC response
sed on most
ts
t the project,d evaluation
based on a “P was $231Mt (defined in
of AREs thatsisted of rec
Es were definrther to the wes at BRT st
basis. The poements.
es of the Pro
1 project inc
submittals
uation, and sh
w, prepare fi
e, ATC revie
previous CD
, the project n criteria to b
“GuaranteedM. The work n RFP Book 2t the proposeonstructing Uned for optiowest, reconstations.
oints availab
oject when
cluded the
hortlisting
inal RFP
ews
DOT design-
goals, be utilized by
d Maximum to be includ
2, Section 1)er could provUS 36 betwe
onal inclusiotructing exis
ble for Best-
31
-
y the
ded ) and vide een
on in sting
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
3. The
RFQ/
Dchrem
Swre
FdPmmprstth
IfnP
DPprre
Cpr
Tanresu
Ffe
Prop
Dacpranacal
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Lessons
Q/RFP Devel
During the RFheck processesources nee
may likely be
tart RFP wowith similar feview for ele
or developmefined protohase 1, CDO
management members cou
roposed or ptatus is, whohe change w
f multiple auomenclaturePP projects
Draw upon prlan. On US roposal-writevisions wer
Co-location orocess greatl
The VE Studynd ITP (rathequirements uggestions w
or PPP type eedback may
osal Prepara
Document poccess RFP droprietary innd all file tyccess to postll RFP docum
es Project eport
lopment Pha
FQ phase - Ns with clear eds to be acce a significan
ork with a gofeatures. Obtements whic
ment of controcols for initiOT’s Sharepteam coordi
uld always finpending chano is responsibas incorpora
uthors are to e, consistent vs. typical D
revious proje36 Phase 1, ter for clarityre made as a
of project tealy.
y conductedher than the p
to manage rwere implem
projects incy modify the
ation and E
osting for prodocuments renformation. Spes (.zip, CAt items to thements and ad
ase
Need to deveexpectationsounted for in
nt factor for
ood base doctain docume
ch may be ap
ract and techiating, reviewoint system inated, reviewnd the latestnges to each ble for makinated.
be preparingorganization
D-B.
ect documenthe project ty of proposaresult which
am key perso
d for the projpreliminary drisk and obta
mented.
clude all disce approach an
Evaluation P
oposers: Utilead-only, witSystem needAD, etc.). A e site. For Pddendums an
elop a details. An appropn the schedushortlisting
cument from nts from oth
pplicable to y
hnical sectionwing, updatiwas used fowed, acceptet document vdraft docum
ng the chang
g the technicn and approa
nts and proceteam had theal requiremenh improved t
onnel during
ect was basedesign) for sain better val
ciplines in rend/or cost-b
Phase
lize a web-bth separate s
ds to be able limited num
Phase 1, CDOnd seemed to
ed proposer priate length ule, since quasome teams
m a recent CDher projects ayour project
ns, implemeing, and finar all documeed, and finalversion. Maiment that incge or answer
cal sections, ach, and clar
esses for ITPe draft ITP rents and evaluthe documen
g RFP develo
ed on the teasuggestions olue from the
eview of the enefit.
ased systemsecure areas to accommo
mber of owneOT’s Sharepo work well
key personn of time andalifications ovs. others.
DOT design-also as appro.
ent a shared falizing each ents and the lized all chanintain a trackcludes a descring the ques
provide trairify differenc
P and Propoeviewed by auation criternt.
opment bene
am reviewingon how to re
e proposals. M
O&M sectio
m with an arefor each teamodate a file fer-side staff point system l.
nel referenced proper of key perso
-build projecopriate and
file system wdocument. Fproject nges. Team king list of cription, whastion, and wh
ining on propces needed f
sal Evaluatioan independ
ria. Numerou
efitted the
g the draft Refine the Many of the
ons, as their
a for all teamm to exchanfolder structuwould havewas used to
32
e
onnel
ct
with For
at the hen
per for
on dent us
RFP
ms to nge ure
o post
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Prop
The fsessio
Wev
ITonmp
RAthfrfu
OafC
AhreEstin
IThre"Escisthv
AA
Public
1. Ove
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
osal Debrief
following coons after the
Was overall cvaluation.
TP did not rene team sug
more critical,ossibly to ev
Requiring theAREs (specifhe type of rerom looking unds for ROW
One team waffect (positiv
CDOT could
Adjectival ratow they are esults in a fa
Excellent-) retill be carefuncluding mo
TP could be ad five pointesulted in "GExcellent" 9chedule to bs available fohey had to res. the cost to
ATC ProcessATC meeting
cInforma
rview
es Project eport
f Feedback
omments and selection:
considered a
equire submgested that C or interim m
valuation bet
e contractor tfically ARE sponsibility at these areaW in the AR
s surprised tvely or negatconsider sta
tings for evacurrently de
airly small raeducing the oully weighedre scope or p
clearer on hts available,
Good" 68 per5 percent, onegin with, coor every twoeally guess ao do it.
– Proposersgs.
ation
d feedback w
a positive tha
ittal of a CPCDOT requimilestones artween propo
to develop R#1 and #2) pthey are accas closer. CD
REs, but cou
that includintively) rating
ating this cle
aluations shoefined apply ange that moopportunity t
d on future prprice vs. valu
how points wbut due to a
rcent of the pnly a 1.35 poould conside
o months of aat how much
s would pref
was received
at CDOT inv
M schedule.re it to be sure more criti
osals, this cou
ROW plans, placed a greacustomed to DOT went thld consider o
ng or not inclgs on other sarer in futur
ould maybe bto all items
ost teams seeto differentirojects to weue added fro
would be distadjectival ratpoints, and toint differener saying meacceleration
h benefit they
fer to get mo
from propo
volved stakeh
. Teams havubmitted. Onical and CDOuld be consi
acquire, andat deal of rishaving so m
his route sincother approa
luding specifsections/goare ITPs.
be reviewed being rated.
em to fall witate between eight appropom other pro
tributed on ittings, meetinthe best schence. Since soeeting RFP is
(or somethiy may get fro
ore immediat
ser teams du
holders in pr
ve to build thn projects whOT needs midered.
d pay for thesk on the promay have disc
ce there wasaches for futu
fic AREs coals like safety
for future p. The currentthin (from Gteams. App
priately the boposal eleme
tems like schng the RFP redule accelero few points s 0 points, aning similar). om a schedu
te and direct
uring debrief
roposal
hem anywayhere schedul
more detail
e ROW for anoposers and icouraged sos no additionure projects.
ould significay or MOT.
roject to seet approach
Good+ to roach should
balance betwents.
hedule. CDOrequirement ration got were assignnd another pOne team sa
ule accelerati
t feedback at
33
f
so le is
ny is not me
nal .
antly
e if
d ween
OT
ned to point aid ion
t
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
RFP BooelementscommunManagemContracto
2. Back
During thwere receand respoproject inCDOT si
3. The
RFP
B
Aen
Phel
Cv
Imple
A
AorC
DP
NOet
Bsh
Mtr
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ok 2 Section included pricating proje
ment (TDM)or is respons
kground/S
he proposal eeived and raonsibilities snformation. Tide in additio
Lessons
Developmen
Be more pres
Allow key stansures buy-i
rovide measelp both RTDlements to se
Clearly defines. CDOT).
ementation/
Always coord
All responsesr RTD prior
Contractor su
Do not have Creference is
Need to makeOperations dutc).
Better planninhould be sha
Make sure coraveler alerts
es Project eport
4 included treparation ofect progress ) strategies. Csible for dev
Status
evaluation pted them acc
shifted into mThe Public Ion to a PI M
nt/Procurem
criptive in th
akeholders toin and compr
surable perfoD and CDOee if the TDM
e roles and r
/Constructio
dinate with R
s to public coto distributi
upport, as ne
Contractor Pfor PI to pro
e sure the Couring closure
ng on large, ared with CD
ontractor does, newsletter
the requiremf a Public Infand coping d
CDOT’s projvelopment of
process, CDOcordingly. Omainly commInformation
Manager and a
ment Phase
he RFP.
o provide inprehensive fe
ormance meaT in future pM methods a
responsibiliti
on Phase
RTD on item
omplaints drion. RTD prcessary.
PI issue RTDovide a link t
ontractor is pes (any chan
impactful coDOT and RT
es a quality crs, etc.).
ments for Pubformation Plduring the p
oject PI teamf most comm
OT PI team mOnce construcmunicating a(PI) team coa Specialist w
put into majeedback.
asures as reqprojects wheare effective
ies for the te
ms that impac
rafted by thereference is t
D detour infoto the RTD w
providing acnges to sched
onstruction eTD ahead of t
check on item
blic Informatlan, which w
project work m is in place amunication to
members revction began,
about construonsists of twworking for
or elements
quirement ofen locals ask e and worthw
eam (what is
ct them – big
e Contractor to handle cu
ormation as twebsite.
ccurate informdule, early or
events and ptime for inpu
ms before CD
tion on the pwas to includ
and Transpoas oversightools.
viewed the p, the CDOT uction impac
wo representar the contract
(like projec
f TDM progrk for fundingwhile.
s contractor’
g or small.
shall be appustomer com
this is not alw
mation to RTr late openin
public meetinut.
DOT review
project. PI de strategies ortation Dem, while the
proposals thaPI team’s rocts and overaatives on thetor.
t logo). It
ram. This wig for these
s responsibil
proved by CDmplaints with
ways correct
TD Bus ng, cancellat
ngs. Those p
ws (flyers,
34
for mand
at oles all
ill
lity
DOT
t.
tions,
plans
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Sre
Dco
E
Ebre
C
P
M
Ban
Ereh
EA
W
In
Einw
D
Eth
Cpr
Pfo
Qualit
1. Ove
RFP Boothe projeand Qual
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
et meeting tevisit quarter
Develop stronommunicatio
Establish rela
Establish bi-weginning. Thelationship in
Coordinate w
air the right
Meet early w
Be flexible wnd often, and
Establishing aesponsibilityeading in the
Establish morApplications,
Weekly trave
nformation k
Establishing an the project
with the bran
Develop grap
Even if they ahe team to be
Celebrate majroject up and
roject eventor special ev
tyManag
rview
ok 2 Section ct. The contrlity Assuranc
es Project eport
o review Strrly. Just send
ng internal con helps to k
ationships wi
weekly coordhey had a den the long ru
with jurisdicti
person with
ith large emp
when workingd establish c
a Transportay of CDOT ae right direct
re maintenan, websites, et
el advisories
kiosks need t
a project bra– contractor
d – new proj
phic standard
aren’t alwaye proactive a
jor milestond running.
s are not fedvents.
gement
3 included tractor is respce (QA). D
rategic Commding for app
communicatikeep the team
ith key stake
dination meeesire and a neun.
ions on majo
h the right sta
ployers alon
g with retail construction
ation Demanand RTD. Mtions.
nce control ftc.
are extreme
to be update
and at the ber, owner, elejects must ad
ds manual fo
ys used, deveand anticipat
nes with com
derally funde
the requiremponsible for
During constr
municationsproval may m
ions. Establim informed
eholders earl
etings with 3eed to be inv
or constructi
akeholder.
ng the corrid
stakeholderhours outsid
nd Managemake sure age
for communi
ely effective.
d frequently
ginning enabected officialdhere to the
or appropriat
eloping key mte issues.
mmunity even
ed. Set aside
ments and respreparing a
ruction, CDO
s Plan with Cmean it gets l
shing and mand resolve
ly on.
36 Commutivolved and a
ion activities
dor.
rs during the de of the mal
ment (TDM) tencies are ob
ication tools
.
y.
bles cohesivls, etc. . (USCDOT bran
te use of the
messages is
nts to keep th
state funds
sponsibilitiesQMP addre
OT performs
CDOT Publiclost in inbox
maintaining sissues early
ing Solutionsallowing that
s and associa
holiday seall’s business
task force tobservers to e
s like Smart
veness for allS 36 was grannd guidelines
project logo
a good pract
he momentu
as part of th
s for Qualityessing Qualits audits to m
c Relations axes.
trong interna.
s in the t helped the
ated detours
ason. Meet eas hours.
ook the nsure group
Phone
l parties invondfathered is).
o.
tice that allo
um and keep
he project bu
y Managemety Control (Q
monitor the
35
and
al
.
arly
olved n
ows
dget
ent on QC)
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Contractotakes theContractoContract Quality AverificatirequiremContracto
2. Back
Satisfyinutilizatioauthoritaof these spreclude
The transbut is tak
3. The
RFP
In ma
ReCoprosu
Reanan
Delia
Re
ThCshtoCcore
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
or’s quality m form of survor’s QMP toDocuments
Assurance (Qion and docu
ments. Qualityor tests, insp
kground/S
ng the need fon of comple
ative quality systems to pproblems.
sition from Qking on the in
Lessons
Developmen
the RFP, reqaterial testin
equire Controntrol resouroduction stach as traffic
equire Contrnd Notice of nd review per
efine At-Riskability, etc).
equire the Ac
he lack of suContractors tyhould not allo follow the
Contractor toonsistency oesource alloc
es Project eport
managemenveillance of
o assess (andand the QM
QA) efforts iumentation thy Control ef
pections, che
Status
for safe, efficx systems reoversight prerform satis
Quality Assuntended func
nt/Procurem
quire Contrang trends, etc
ractor to idenrces on the Paff is ideal). M
control, ero
ractor to defiDesign Chanriods.
k Process in
cceptance Pr
ubcontractor ypically requlow this and Contractors provide all
on the Projeccation, etc) a
nt efforts durthe construc
d confirm) coMP. Monitori
is intended tohat products
fforts that areecklists, and
cient, cost-efequires the imrogram. Earlfactorily, an
urance to Quction over tim
ment Phase
actor to holdc. Better def
ntify staffingProject in ProMake sure thsion control
ine Request nge (NDC) p
n the RFP (w
rocess to be
quality proguire their subshould provquality progQC and QA
ct for all quaand puts acco
ing construcction operatiompliance wing of the Coo confirm ths, systems, ane monitored reports.
ffective transmplementatiy identificat
nd timely cor
uality Oversime.
d weekly quafine purpose
g numbers fooposal (a stahat QA resou, and ITS.
for Informatprocesses in
when it can be
defined in th
grams is alwabs to providevide Contracgram. The la
A for the subclity efforts (ountability b
ction of the Uions, and the
with both the ontractor’s Qhat the Contrnd subsysteminclude (but
sportation seion of a pro-tion of condirrective actio
ight has dem
ality task forof these me
or Quality Aated ratio of qurces are ide
tion (RFI), Fn the QMP, in
e used, comm
he QMP.
ays a problee their own Qct language ranguage shocontractors. documentati
back on to th
US 36 Corride activities ou
requiremenQuality Contractor providms conform t are not lim
ervices throu-active, systeitions that afons, are nece
monstrated a
ces to discuseetings.
Assurance andquality assurentified for s
Field Designncluding CD
munication w
em on ProjecQC/QA resorequiring all ould also req This will prion, inspectihe Contracto
dor. Auditinutlined in th
nts of the trol (QC) anddes completeto Project
mited to)
ugh the ematic, ffect the abilessary to
few challeng
ss NCs, NCR
d Quality rance staff to
specialty item
n Change (FDDOT involve
with CDOT,
cts (General ources). CDsubcontract
quire the rovide ion, schedulior.
36
ng he
d e
lity
ges,
RS,
o ms
DC), ement
,
OT tors
ing,
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Imple
Do
NeCo
Au
Deau
Au
Recothecothe
Fo
Es
RTRe
De
Prba
Hafol
Quan
IdeTa
De
Hama
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ementation/
o not direct t
eed to have dontractor and
udits should
evelop a riskuditing.
udit frequenc
equire the Coonstruction ae QA proces
onstruction. ese (a specif
ocus should b
stablishing c
TD’s QMO decommend C
evelop an au
oduce projecasis is time c
ave frequentllowing the e
uality task fond those need
entify qualitask Force Me
evelop a high
aving a desigany of these
es Project eport
/Constructio
the Contract
defined cound QA staff o
be focused o
k matrix for e
cy should be
ontractor to pctivities prio
sses/checklisThis is not r
fic example i
be primarily
ommunicati
database is aCDOT devel
udit schedule
ct quality reponsuming. T
t refresher coestablished p
orce and comding improve
ty trends andeetings.
h level Qual
gnated CDOitems above
on Phase
or’s means a
nterpart/partnn who is in c
on Contract
each project
e based off ri
provide QA or to CDOT sts be allowerecommendeis ITS eleme
y on process
on protocols
a good tool fop somethin
e based on co
port on a quaThe Contract
ourses on theprocesses.
mmunicationement.
d how to cha
lity Managem
OT Quality Me to remain a
and methods
nering laddecharge of a s
requirement
element and
isk level of t
processes inapproval. T
ed to be submed as the Conents).
audits and le
s and CDOT
for tracking ang with simil
ontractor’s s
arterly basistor’s quality
e auditing pr
ns should hig
nge or conti
ment Audit T
Manager on tha focus throu
s. Rely on th
er to eliminaspecific area
ts.
d use this as
the particula
n the QMP fThe Contractmitted at a lantractor is le
ess on constr
T expectation
and resolvinlar capabiliti
scheduled ac
s. Producing report shoul
rocess to ma
ghlight both
inue these, a
Training (ex
the Project isughout the P
he Contractu
ate confusiona or disciplin
a priority pl
ar work item
for all foresetor may requater date closess likely to a
ruction audi
ns early on th
ng quality issies for statew
ctivities.
this documeld still be pr
ake sure all s
areas of goo
s appropriat
xample: Ashb
s a good ideaProject.
al requireme
n with the ne.
lanning tool
m to the Proje
eeable uest that somser to actually dev
ts.
he Project is
sues. wide use.
ent on a monroduced mon
taff are
od performan
e, in the Qua
brooke)
a as it allows
37
ents.
for
ect.
me of
velop
s key.
nthly nthly.
nce
ality
s
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Right
1. Ove
RFP (ROWCDOdatesrespopropo
2. Back
CDObe abpercedelivconst
3. The
RFP
Hprpr
Hflpr
Harac
Aprscabju
Mteacbu
APas
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ofWay
rview
Book 2 SectW) acquisitio
OT was respo that acquire
onsible for thosal, or any R
kground/S
OT prepared Rble to deliverentage of theery of ROWtruction activ
Lessons
Developmen
Having projecroject schedroject of this
Having key inlow of commroject.
Having sufficrise is an imcquisition.
A challenge freliminary Rchedule. Havbility to quicustification t
Many areas oeam utilized cquiring poruilding more
A potential riurchase (totassistance, th
es Project eport
tion 8 includon on the proonsible for deed propertieshe cost of ROROW or eas
Status
ROW plans r the new ROe project imp
W for the maivities.
nt/Procurem
ct specific pdule while ads magnitude
ndividuals wmunication a
cient, dedicaportant com
from a ROWRFP design tving team mckly ascertaio upper man
of US 36 borthe ROW ac
rtions of deve or taller ret
isk was mitigal acquisitioe risk is that
ded the requioject. For thefinition ands would be mOW plans ansements need
based on theOW to the coprovements fn project are
ment Phase
ersonnel assddressing the.
with related eand coordina
ated resourcemponent at lea
W perspectivethat are typic
members within the validitnagement wh
rdered establcquisition teeloped proptaining wall
gated by the n) parcels. A
t the prelimin
irements ande main projed acquisitionmade availabnd acquisitioded beyond t
e RFP designontractor witfell within theas did not e
signed for alle numerous a
expertise andtion between
es available tast as it relat
e is addressincal of a DB ph previous Dty of adminishen needed.
lished resideam to help aerties (parkis to avoid co
early identifAs most of thnary design
d responsibilect’s Basic Cn of ROW. Sble to the conon needed forthe limits be
n and beganthin 6 monthhe existing Uend up being
l functions iand ongoing
d past experin the various
to immediatetes to ROW
ng the numeproject while
DB experiencstrative settl
ential or comassess the coing spaces, bostly acquisi
fication and hese requiredchanges sign
lities for RigConfigurationSection 8 incntractor. Ther AREs inclu
eing provided
n acquisition hs of NTP. AUS 36 corridg a constraint
s critical to mg issues that a
ience greatlys partners w
ely address aplans, surve
erous revisioe maintainince greatly imlements and
mmercial areaost tradeoff bbuildings, acitions.
acquisition d some typenificantly en
ght-of-Way n elements, luded a tablee contractor uded in theird by CDOT.
early enougA large or ROW, sot to the main
maintaining arise on a D
y benefits theorking the
any issues they, appraisal
ons to the ng the projecmproved the
to provide
as. The desigbetween cesses, etc.)
of the Advae of relocationough that th
38
e of was r .
gh to
n
the -B
e
hat l, and
ct
gn
vs.
ance on hese
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
pad
Imple
Fwco
RTDC
1. Ove
RTD curapproximcorridor atraffic dusmall winThe RTDrequires t
2. Back
The Contprovide a
3. The
RFP
RinrelaRn
NCca
Ah(m
R
InR
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
arcels are nodvance of th
ementation/
or additionawas concludeonduct the a
Coordina
rview
rently operamately 10,00as it remove
uring construndows of tim
D bus stationthat US 36 a
kground/S
tract requirea temporary
Lessons
Developmen
Revise RFP lnterruptions elocations, reast minute, re
RTD Bus Opotice.
Need realisticContractor. Rause major i
Add languagours in advamany of the
Require Cont
nclude workRTD costs if
es Project eport
o longer requhe remaining
/Constructio
al ROW or ped it was moracquisition, a
tion
ates a robust 0 daily passe
es a number ouction. This me for the cons are locatedand the affec
Status
s the contracstation locat
nt/Procurem
anguage to rat least 1 weequire 2 weeequire the Cerations – th
c schedule daRTD distribuissues if it is
ge to RFP reqance prior to RTD utilitie
tractor to use
king time vioa station is c
uired. The reg parcels.
on Phase
ermanent eare efficient f
and just be re
express and engers. Thisof single occservice oper
ontractor to cd at the US 3cted ramps st
ctor to mainttion.
ment Phase
require Conteek prior to ieks of notice
Contractor to hese addition
ates for closutes this infonot accurate
quiring Contimpacting e
es are not on
e RTD stand
olations incidclosed due to
eward is that
asements thafor the CDOeimbursed b
local bus ses bus service cupant vehicrates throughclose ramps 36 off and ontay open dur
tain access t
tractor to notimplementate. For closupay for the
nal resources
ures, detourormation to te.
tractor to noexisting RTDn UNCC) and
dard detour s
dents for RTo Constructio
t any relocat
at the contracOT ROW team
y the contra
ervice along is critical to
cles from thehout the day and completn ramps throring service h
to the RTD b
tify RTD of tion. For majures or detouadditional bs can’t be ca
s, constructithe public vi
otify RTD FaD facilities. Td eliminates
signage for te
TD impacts inon. Recomm
tions are clea
ctor needs fom to prepare
actor for the t
US 36 that so the TDM ee roadway, thand night, le
te constructioughout the chours.
bus stations a
f any detoursajor closures urs that are cuses that we
ancelled with
ion impacts, ia the RTD w
acilities ManThis aids in usecurity con
emporary sta
nto the Contmend a mini
ared well in
or their worke the plans atotal cost.
serves efforts alonghereby reduceaving only ion activitiescorridor, wh
at all times o
s or route or station ancelled at t
ere scheduledhout 24 hour
etc. from thwebsite and c
nagement 24utility locatincerns.
ations and st
tract to coverimum of $3,0
39
k, it and
the cing
s. hich
or
the d by rs
he can
4 ions
tops.
r 000
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
pm
Cfastmth
SR
N
Imple
Hre
Rdto
TtrNal
Tco
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
er day to covmajor detour.
Clearly defineacility minimtation and co
multiple weekhe permanen
tation designRecommenda
o Windsanothemore
o Combadditi
o Use stpanels
o Recomdevelowouldcustompanelscommdiffererequir
Need to invol
ementation/
Having RTD esolution tim
RTD has woretail time sloo perform so
The contractoraveling pub
Need to very ll times durin
The contractoompleted on
es Project eport
ver the addit.
e RTD scopemum requiremonsider the dks or months
nt station).
n requiremenations from R
screens shouer set of glasprotection w
bining the caonal protecti
tandard or eas instead of g
mmend that op a RTD Std reduce longm station eles, furniture, r
mercially avaent ways to pring custom p
lve RTD FM
/Constructio
staff on the me for issues
rked with theots when sta
ome work act
or has agreedlic but allowclear to conng operation
or has also prn the ramps i
tional impac
e elements inments. Nee
duration that s, the tempor
nts should bRTD FM inc
uld provide bss panels sta
when prevaili
anopy and thion for patro
asily availabglass, standa
RTD FM antandard Specg term constements. FM replacement
ailable stationprovide uniqparts.
M and Bus Op
on Phase
project cons, design revi
e contractor ations have btivities durin
d to provide wing RTD bu
tractor that Rns unless app
rovided temin phases.
cts to Bus Op
n the RFP, ined to clearly the temporarary station
e strengthenclude:
better protecaggered on thing winds co
e windscreenons.
ble componeard shapes an
nd RTD Engicifications dtruction and would only
t parts, etc. Fn componenque architect
perations in
struction teamiews, etc.
to provide thbreaks betweng these brea
flagging seruses to continRTD bus accproved other
mporary statio
perations ass
ncluding ADdefine the r
ary facility wshould prov
ned in the Co
ction from thhe loading siome from th
ns into one s
ents for all stnd sizes, stan
ineering grodocument for
maintenance have to stocFM believes
nts (Toler, ettural feature
the scoping
m aids in co
he current bueen services.aks.
rvices at ramnue to use thcess to the strwise.
ons at some
sociated with
DA criteria arequirementswill be in servide equivale
ontract docum
he wind. Potide of the wi
hat side of the
structure wo
tation elemenndard mater
oups work tor use on all Pe costs assocck specific ps that some otc.) can be cs at each sta
phase of the
oordination a
us service sc This allows
mp closures, dhe ramps to tations must
locations so
h a closure o
and temporars for a temporvice (if for ent facilities
ments.
tentially addindscreens toe platform.
ould provide
nts: Lexan ials, paint, e
ogether to Projects. Thciated with paints, glass of the combined in ation without
e Project.
and improve
chedules thas the Contrac
detouring thaccess statiot be maintain
that work c
40
or
ry orary
to
d o add
etc.
is
t
s
at ctor
he ons. ned at
an be
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Topp
Rgrcowpu
ToRco
Kacim
Inmth
Intoan
Ndrev(s
Samd
NcoRfiC
Nthrest
AthC
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
The contractoperations infassengers kn
Require Controups prior tomplaints by
with the new ublic and tha
The contractof any upcom
RTD Securityonstruction a
Keeping RTDctivities is chmprove com
nvolve RTDmaintenance he Project pr
ncluding Woo RTD facilind compensa
Need to clarifesigner specesulting in reerifying ADsurveying on
et up a way menities on etermine thi
Need to estabonstruction (
RTD propertyind it once it
Contractor lo
Need to devehis as a courtequested by tate utility re
Access to RThe Contracto
Contractor ha
es Project eport
or and US 36forming themnow what to
tractor to perto opening tey RTD patrofacilities. Tat bus operat
or is also proming work at y to aid in idactivity at th
D Bus Operahallenging. Imunication
FM group iproblems pr
rior to turn o
orking Time ities would eate RTD for
fy ADA critecified an ADemoval and r
DA compliann a defined g
for RTD FMthe Project is and will sp
blish a proce(a tracking sy was suppot was removest it).
lop a better utesy for Conthe Contract
egistration da
TD secure facor for the statas not done a
6 project stafm of upcomiexpect on th
rform safe toemporary orons and allowThis also provtions will be
oviding 24-hthe stations
dentifying unhe stations.
ations and FaIdentify poinand issue res
in the designrior to constrover.
Violation Inencourage thr operations i
eria during dDA slope that
replacementce of constru
grid instead o
M to identifyin case of dapeed up the r
ss for removsystem or chsed to be saled (either pic
utility locatintractors in thtors is makinatabase in th
cilities needstion electricaa good job of
ff also proviing closures he corridor.
o open walkr new stationw bus operatvides verific
e able to func
hour notices t. This allow
nidentified ut
acilities Mannt of contactsolution.
n review procruction. This
ncident charghe Contractorimpacts asso
design procet left no roomt of the concructed work aof using a lev
y ownership aamage. This repair proces
val of amenitain of custodlvaged or stocked up by R
ion process ohe past, but lng this unfeahe near futur
s to be addreal and compf returning th
de regular uand detours
with RTD bns. This willtions and faccation that evction correct
to the RTD Fs the Facilititilities and to
nagement not for each gro
cess to assists also allows
ges or Liquir to plan statociated with
ess. Numerom for typicalrete. Also nat the beginnvel over sma
and mainten will save FMss.
ties and furndy process). ored by FM,RTD and sto
on RTD propliability andasible. RTDre, so this iss
essed. RTD puter rooms ahese keys an
updates to RTs, so that bus
bus operationl reduce the ncilities to becverything is tly.
Facilities Mies Maintenao be made a
otified of conoup early in
t in identifyis FM to beco
idated Damation work mdetours.
ous instancesl constructio
need to definning of the Pall distances
nance of shelM a lot of st
niture from s Numerous but Contrac
ored mistake
perty. RTD d the quick tuD is planningsue may be m
FM providealong the cornd these key
TD bus s operators a
ns and facilitnumber of come familiasafe for the
aintenance gance group a
aware of any
nstruction process to
ing long termome familiar
ages for impaore effective
s where the on tolerancesne process foProject s).
lters and stattaff time tryi
stations durininstances w
ctor could noenly or
FM has donurnaround on joining t
mitigated.
ed master kerridor. The
ys provide ac41
and
ties
ar
group and
m r with
acts ely
s or
tion ing to
ng where ot
ne
the
eys to
ccess
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
tonRprola
Nwsywatreto
Bprthfrev
Pd
Dto
Rdimbre
RcuP
Vlobu
In
Signin
1. Ove
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
o RTD facilieed to re-key
RTD FM recoroject and FMf the temporanguage.
Need to makeworking on uystems at sta
would be to pt each stationesponse to ouo be restored
BRT project tresent were he very end orom the begiveryone on w
rovide projeay to aid in g
Detour and clo guarantee c
RTD Bus Opone more qumpacts. Thee precisely seject any pro
Recognize thaustomers of roject.
Value engineong term imput can cause
nclude RTD
ng,Stripi
rview
es Project eport
ities throughy many of thommends thM will switcrary locks sh
e sure that thutilities. Manations when provide the Cn prior to theutages was n
d within 24 h
team activatvery helpfulof the Projecinning of thewhat was oc
ect staff out aguiding the b
losure signagconsistency
erations is ouickly and efese instancesscheduled anoposals from
at, along witthe Project.
ering propospact evaluatie long term s
FM in desig
ing,Sign
hout the RTDhe rooms in tat temporarych them backhould be som
he Contractony instances tying into th
Contractor we start of connot prompt –hours of an o
tion meetingl. Typically ct. Both parte project to cccurring on th
at any stationbus operator
ge for RTD with RTD st
pen to discufficiently, rats need to be ind executed.
m the Contrac
th the traveli Need to kee
sals should bion prior to aservice and m
gn review to
nals,and
D District (nothe district (y lock cylindk to permane
mething that R
r has a goodwhen the C
he existing uwith better asnstruction ac– potentially outage.
s (internal toRTD FM anties thought
close out washe project.
n that is detors and the pu
stations shoutandard prac
ussing closurther than a pidentified at RTD Bus O
ctor.
ing public, Rep that in mi
be vetted witacceptance. maintenance
minimize lo
d Lighting
ot just the Uthis is time cders be instaent at the enRTD can inc
d understandContractor knutilities. Potes-builts and tctivities. In add contrac
o RTD) whend Bus Operthat having s beneficial
oured, closedublic.
uld be provictices throug
res at stationprolonged cot the beginninOperations r
RTD FM andind when ma
th both RTD These may impacts to R
ong term ma
g
S 36 corridoconsuming a
alled at the bnd of the Projclude in futu
ding of the Rnocked out eential to mitito hold pre-ageneral the C
ct language r
ere all departrations are nall departmeand a good w
d, or modifie
ided by the Rghout the dist
ns if construconstruction png of the Pro
retains the rig
d Bus Operaaking decisio
D FM and Busound good
RTD.
aintenance is
or). RTD wiand costly). eginning of ject. The su
ure Contract
RTD system wmergency igate this risactivity meetContractor requiring util
tments were ot included uents involveway to infor
ed for the fir
RTD Sign Shtrict.
ction work cperiod with doject and mught to approv
ations are theons on the
us Operationd in the short
ssues.
42
ill
a upply
when
sk tings
lities
until d
rm
rst
hop
an be daily ust ve or
e end
ns for t run,
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
RFP Booand LighProject asigns, an
2. Back
At this po
3. The
RFP
Aco
Imple
Struct
1. Ove
RFP projeStruc
2. Back
US36culvecomp112thbridg
The pMechwallsprovi
The pstruct(desigBridg
3. The
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ok 2 Section hting on the prea. These pd additions,
kground/S
oint in the pr
Lessons
Developmen
At the presenompleted on
ementation/
tures
rview
Book 2 Sectct and Sectio
ctures on the
kground/S
6 Phase 1 incerts (major anpleted: Struch Avenue ovges are still b
project incluhanically Stas, Post-and-Piding a noise
project also itures were bgned by the ge, Sign Brid
Lessons
es Project eport
14 includedproject. The plans include
removals, o
Status
roject, no pe
nt/Procurem
nt time, theren the job
/Constructio
tion 15 incluon 15A incluproject.
Status
cludes five bnd minor strture E-16-Y
ver US 36, anbeing constru
udes about 50abilized EartPanel (PP) we wall.
includes signoth standardcontractor).
dge with Can
d the requiremcontractor is
e all necessarr modificatio
ermanent sig
ment Phase
e are no lesso
on Phase
uded the requuded revisio
bridge replacructures com
YB Wadswornd E-16-HKucted by pha
0 major wallth (MSE) wa
walls and land
n structures d (meeting C
The contracntilever, and
ments and res required tory guide, waons to existi
gnage or ligh
ons learned,
uirements anns or additio
cements, thrembined). At trth Pkwy (SH
K West Flatirased construc
ls and severaalls, Soil Naidscape walls
for new signCDOT S-stan
ctor utilizedd Butterfly ty
esponsibilitieo prepare traarning, suppling signs and
hting has bee
as very little
nd responsibons to the St
ee bridge withis time, thr
H 121) over ron Crossingction for traf
al minor walil walls, Cass. The walls
nage, VMS ondard limitatd Cantilever, ype sign stru
es Signing, Saffic designs lemental, and appurtenan
en installed.
e permanent
ilities for Strtandard Spec
idenings, andree bridges hUS 36, Stru
g Dr over USffic access.
lls. Wall typst-in-place (Care either fo
or ITS equiptions) and noSign Bridge
uctures.
Striping, Sigand plans fo
nd regulatorynces.
t work has be
ructures on tcifications fo
d eleven boxhave been fucture E-16-Y
S 36. All oth
pes include CIP) cantilevor retaining f
pment. The son-standard e, M-Sign
43
gnals, or the y
een
the or
x ully YC her
ver fill or
sign
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
RFP
Pchlothacsp
TRin4mLcudcl
S1Hwra
Bthpuprap
Cinwinpr
Fpm2S
Twprw
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
Developmen
recast Box Choose betweot of joints inhan the floorcceptable. Ifpecification.
The RFP SectRFP based onn the future. ’ span.) CD
meet ASTM CLRFD Specifulverts desigoes not havelear.
imilarly, AS2 for Reinfo
However, whwithin VIRTIating through
BOXCAR wahis is not a Cublished outrograms, or pproved pro
Cross-referennformation d
written in botnformation. Srovides over
or Non-Staner 2012 CDO
manufactured) Bend radii -standards.
There was amwas written. I
recludes conwritten as req
es Project eport
nt/Procurem
Culverts as Peen cast-in-pn the floor wr of a cast-inf not, the RF
tion 15.2.4.2n discussions(in late 2015
DOT M-stanC1433, whicfications as rgned by the ce this require
STM C1577 orced Concrehen this thrusIS (BrR). Thh VIRTIS (B
as used by thCDOT-approtside of Staffrequire proggram list.
nce and reviedoes not existh Section 15Section 10 crlay options.
ndard Sign SOT S-standad in the USA
for non-stan
mbiguity withItems to be anformance wquired for Se
ment Phase
Pedestrian Ulace or preca
where the pren-place box. T
P should cal
2 requires los with Staff 5, FHWA nodards (July 2ch is AASHTrequired per contractor toement update
tables are deete Pipes, whst load is conhe RFP shalBrR).
he precast booved programf Bridge for gram verifica
ew other RFPst. For exam5 and Sectioncalls for SMA
Structures: 1ard. SeamlesA, which requndard design
h how “Reviadded to futu
with Section ection 628, w
Underpasses –ast box culvecast sectionThe managell for a leveli
ad rating forBridge that to requires ra2012) for prTO StandardRFP, the co
o meet ASTMed, which re
esigned usinhich includesnsidered in pl state LF =
ox culvert dem. Howeverthe contract
ation for any
P sections tomple, vertical
n 19 (ITS &A mixture on
) Cantileverss pipe is onuired thickerns should not
ision to Secture Section 6509, QA req
whether this
– Generally,verts. If they ns fit togetheement team ning surface o
r all box culvthis may bec
ating all culvrecast box cud Specificatintractor used
M C1577. Cequires a stat
ng thrust per s circular, elprograms, it 0.0 for thrus
esigner. In dr, this approvtor. The RFPy programs t
o verify dupll clearance f
& Tolling), wn bridge dec
r sign structunly available r pipe sectiot be smaller
tion 628 Brid628 specificaquirements bsection appl
, the contracchoose precr. These tendneeds to decor some othe
verts. This wcome an FHW
verts greater ulverts less tions. To med ASTM Pre
Current CDOtement in the
AASHTO Llliptical, andwill not ratest on box cul
discussion wved programP shall state that are not i
licate or confor VMS sign
with contradiccks, while Se
ures require sup to 24” dins for non-sthan those s
dge Deck anations: whet
by referencinlies to all pre
tor is able tocast, there ard to be bumpide if this is er smoothne
was added toWA requiremthan or equathan 20’ spaet AASHTOecast box
OT M-standae RFP to be
LRFD Chaptd arch shapese above 1.0 lverts when
with Staff Brim list is not
any unapproncluded on t
ntradictory n structures ctory ection 15
seamless pipiameter whe
standard desishown in CD
nd Girder Unther Section ng Section 50efabricated
44
o e a pier
ss
o the ment al to an O
ard
ter s.
idge,
oved the
was
pe en igns.
DOT
nit” 628 09 or
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
br5re
SfrspSsoth
Fp
Rar
Mvto
Bin(R
CRco
Can
Imple
Peiprin
A
Epr
E
Cww
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ridge or just09.17, 509.1eference or p
ection for Strom CDOT Gpecific requipecs/Manuaome requiremhe reports, in
urther definearticularly w
Reconsider mre expected.
Modify structerified by viowards rehab
Based on a rinspection beReference So
Consider elimReference Drontractor.
Consider whand approved
ementation/
rocedure forither added trecast elemencluded in th
All soil nail w
Existing soil nrior to any w
Ensure CVN
Consistently mwork to be pework to inclu
es Project eport
t prefabricate18, 509.19, 5part of the sp
tructure FouGeotech Brairements or pals. (CDOT ments.) CDncluding all a
e the use of when definin
minimum decContractor
ture rehabilitisual inspectbilitation sho
sk analysis wyond that shouth Boulde
minating conrawings of R
at variance red Aesthetic T
/Constructio
r shop drawito the RFP oents are desighe plan sets s
walls shall ha
nail walls shwork within t
testing (as a
monitor the erformed. Wude.
ed pedestrian509.21, 509.2pecification.
undation Anaanch during rpreferences tis currently OT Geotechapplicable fa
“architecturang what code
ck thickness consistently
tation sectiotion, which mould not be h
with Staff Brhown in curreer Creek and
ncept plans, aRFP and the u
equests or chTreatment Pl
on Phase
ing review anor discussed gned by a vesent to CDO
ave a project
hall have appthe reinforce
applicable) h
structure damWork perform
n bridges, et22, 509.27 a
alysis and Dereport reviewthat are not cwriting a Ge
h Branch reqactors and re
al elements e requiremen
requirementargued for 6
on to indicatemay or may nhindered by
ridge, determent SIA is re20th St HOV
as this is a duupcoming Pr
hanges durinlan.
nd requiremearly in the p
endor, the deOT for review
t standard sp
propriate soied zone.
has been don
mage of exismed during w
tc. In particuand 509.28 sh
esign: Basew, this sectiocurrently speeotechnical M
quested all mesults.
and componnts are applic
t of 8” if ped6” deck thick
e that structunot modify tproviding a
mine whetheequired for bV as exampl
uplicate or hreliminary D
ng design req
ments for CDproject. Bec
etails shown w.
pecification w
il nail survey
ne prior to ste
sting structuwidenings ma
ular, Sectionhould be inc
ed on the comon should anelled out witManual, whi
methodology
nents” in the cable.
destrian/bikekness on the
ure damage lthe scope. Inprescriptive
er a detailed bridges to remes of this sce
hybrid of whDesign Packa
quire an upd
OT involvemcause some w in shop draw
written.
y or location
eel shipment
ures to verifyay present ad
ns 509.14, cluded as
mments receny CDOT-thin existingich may cleato be define
RFP,
eway structuese structure
listed must bnnovation
e list.
bridge main. enario.)
hat was showage by the
date to the fin
ment should wall types awings are no
n verification
t.
y list of rehabdditional reh
45
eived
g ar up ed in
ures s.
be
wn in
nal
be and ot
n
b hab
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
Survey
1. Ove
RFP projesurveweste
2. Back
The cphaseneede
3. The
RFP
Bth
Fbfr
TdD
Imple
Eeq
Apr
Third‐
1. Ove
RFP AgreAgenOwneto ageof the
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
y
rview
Book 2 Sectct. CDOT pr
ey (Federal tern project li
kground/S
contractor we; during theed for increa
Lessons
Developmen
Be clear in RFhere is no mi
or utility surased on acturom key map
The accuracyiscrepancies
Days of NTP
ementation/
Ensure that prquipment is
Allow for optroviding the
‐PartyAg
rview
Book 2 Sectements on th
ncies, Railroaers. In additiency-fundede Bikeway o
es Project eport
tion 9 includrovided exiso US 287) aimit). A cont
Status
was able utilize D/B phase ased detail or
nt/Procurem
FP what the isunderstand
rveys, be cleual locates anps, owner fil
y of the RFP s in control p1 will be res
/Constructio
roject QA hoin good wor
tion of usingey meet spec
greemen
tion 6 includhe project. Tad, Irrigationion, CDOT ed enhancemeor selected in
ded the requisting topograand aerial matrol diagram
ze the CDOTthey have sur extents.
ment Phase
basis and mding.
ear in RFP (vnd surveys, ales, etc.
topo and surpoint informasurveyed or c
on Phase
olds a pre-surking order a
g Universal Tified toleran
nts
ded the requiThird-party cn Ditch Comentered into ents or additinterchange fe
irements andaphic informapping suppl
m was also pr
T-provided supplemented
methods are o
via separate and which ar
rvey was noation providcorrected by
urvey conferand have bee
Total Stationnces.
irements andcoordination mpanies, Pub
IGAs with lions to the peatures.
d responsibilmation based lemented wirovided.
survey informd with additio
of topo surve
files, etc.) wre based on b
ot guaranteedded that is repy CDOT at n
rence and thaen certified p
n for fine gra
d responsibiland approva
blic Utility Olocal agencie
project, and f
lities for Suron a combin
ith field surv
mation for thonal field su
ey provided
which utility best availab
d, but the RFported to CD
no cost to the
at contractorper CDOT S
ading/blue to
lities related als were requ
Owners and Pes along the for local age
rvey on the nation of fie
vey (US 287
he proposal urvey where
by CDOT so
informationle informatio
FP stated thaDOT within e Contractor
r’s survey Survey Manu
opping,
to Third-Pauired from LPrivate Utilitcorridor relancy mainten
46
ld to
o
n is on
at any 60 .
ual.
arty Local ty ated nance
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
2. Back
Initiacurrewhich
3. The
RFP
AprpranUriin
Ifthcoasop
Sen
Imple
TA
Vth
Utility
1. Ove
RFP projeprojeworkowneident
2. Back
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
kground/S
al coordinationt status or dh would affe
Lessons
Developmen
Although coorocess to putromising at tnd a change
US36 bridge.isk to these in place if the
f local agenchese featuresonfigurations a bid optioption prices
ee discussionhancement
ementation/
The IGA procAccount for t
Verify that CDhe IGA.
yRelocat
rview
Book 2 Sectct. In additioct identified
k with these eers, and four ification num
kground/S
es Project eport
Status
on with mosdraft agreemect the design
nt/Procurem
ordination wt a crossing the start andorder issued Approvals f
items, especie original con
cies request bs ahead of timn. For some on hoping to
were much
on on IGAs inprocess.
/Constructio
cess is time cthis time in y
DOT accoun
tions
tion 7 includon, Book 1 i
d six private uentities, fourmore with p
mbers were i
Status
st entities waments were in
n-build prop
ment Phase
ith the Railrunder the ra
d was suppord during confrom railroadially if they ncept becom
betterments me and then features, theget a lower higher.
n the Contra
on Phase
consuming ayour project
nting is billin
ded the requincluded sectutility owner utility relocpublic utilityidentified in
as started durncluded in thposals.
oad was starailroad for thrted by the Rnstruction to ds will alwaare critical p
mes infeasibl
which they wjust include
e local agencprice than th
act Managem
and lengthy schedule.
ng 3rd partie
irements andtions and ders and five pcation agreemy owners. Du
the utility m
ring the devehe RFP docu
rted by CDOhe Bikeway, Railroad ultim
put the bikeays be a chalpath items, ale.
will fund, we the work incy requestedhe CDOT es
ment section
for negotiati
es per the pa
d responsibilfinitions app
public utilityments were uring projectmatrix.
elopment ofuments, espe
OT very earlya concept thmately had teway over thlenge; assign
and have a co
work to agreen the basic prd we include timate, but t
of this docu
ion and 3rd p
ayment sched
lities for Utilplicable to uty owners in texecuted wit developme
f the RFP, anecially for ite
y in the RFPhat looked to be discardhe railroad onn appropriatontingency p
e on a cost foroject their betterm
the resulting
ument for loc
party approv
dule defined
lities on the tility work. Tthe corridor.ith private utnt, 329 utilit
47
nd ems
P
ded n the te plan
or
ments
cal
val.
d in
The To
tility ty
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
The uEnergidentamou
4. The
RFP
Witp
Abr
Ddre
Cthisutnbu
Eut2
Imple
Tonnupoppwavfuin
Wwth
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
utilities impagy has the mified 353 uti
unt of utilitie
Lessons
Developmen
When doing pt difficult to otential utili
A more detailreaks would
During the deiscussions welocated and
Consider provhe RFP deves for CDOT tility ownerseeds to be reudget for the
Educate utilittility owners- 3 years to g
ementation/
There seems tne work ordumber can hotential utilif the utility hlans (storm potential utili
work orders avoidance/imuture (i.e. Can 10 years an
When groupework elementhe RFC proc
es Project eport
acts in the comajority of thility conflictes has proven
nt/Procurem
preliminary properly ideity relocation
led Utility Md be beneficia
evelopment/pwith the utilitd potential sc
viding the abelopment produring the ses and possiblelocated durie utility relo
ty owners dus to understaget a project
/Constructio
to be a miscder or one nohave multipleity conflicts has been apppipes, bridgeity impacts wand no-confl
mpact processan CDOT retnd understan
ed in a singlets associatedcess is segme
orridor are 2he dry utilitys or resolution to be a cha
ment Phase
utility investentify the utin.
Matrix, with mal.
procurementty owners aschedules and
bility (schedocess. The melection procly have theming construccation, or re
uring the devand CDOT's t to physical
on Phase
onception tho-conflict fore work order(grading, pippropriately ae, retaining wwith each utilict forms wos, and have mtrieve projec
nd what deci
e work orderd with the onented with m
5 percent wey impacts. Ason impacts oallenge, espe
tigation, maplity and und
many more u
t stage, it wos to how/whed costs, and i
dule and budgmore detailed
cess. This wm more recepction. The utilocate the ut
velopment stD-B procureconstruction
hat a utility irm associatedrs and no-copes, foundatavoided or rewalls, gradinility needs toould providemore retrievact documentasions were m
r, it is very dne work ordemultiple pote
et utilities ans of Septembon the projececially on a c
apping is schderstanding th
utility identi
ould beneficen the potentidentify it on
get) to pothod the Utility Mwould also prptive to a timility owner ctility prior to
tage about Dement procen.
identificationd with that u
onflicts assoctions, etc.) toelocated. As ng, lighting) o be processee a completeable documeation (work made during
difficult to ider. Utilities aential impact
nd 75 percenber 2013, thect. Working corridor of th
hematic at behe complexi
ification num
cial to have mtial utility w
n the Utility
ole more keyMatrix is, throvide more mely responscould also apo the project
D-B. It is veryess, and that
n number coutility. A utilciated to addo assure that the particulaare develop
ed. In additioe explanationentation for order and no
g construction
dentify all ofare a reactionts from multi
nt dry. Xcel e contractor on such a vahis size.
est, which mity of the
mbers at logi
more detailedwould be
Matrix.
y utilities duhe lower the assurance to
se when a facppropriately .
y difficult foit typically t
ould only havlity identific
dress the the entire lear separate R
ped, a reviewon, multiplen of the utilitCDOT in tho-conflict fon?)
f the potentian to design, iple project
48
has ast
makes
ical
d
uring risk
o the cility
or takes
ve cation
ength RFC
w of e ty e
orms)
al and
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
elww
TRB
BWanagrereAbtoexOnObyTcowdapdas
Tonwto14repfacob
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
lements. Adwork associatwet utilities).
There are newRelocation ABuy America
Book 2 SectioWork that is r
n agreementgreement anesponsible foesponsible to
Agreement.” een executedo have the Cxecuted. Th
Owner refuseot entered in
Orders/DRALy permit and
There are circontract proce
where a URAeveloping expplicable thiocumentatiossociated wi
The US 36 prnce subsurfa
when reviewio understand4.1.4.1 (Permequired to beermanent Wacilities, struonsider inclueing shown
ARE
es Project eport
ditional worted with the
w requiremengreements (U
a language an
on 7.6.1 (Utirequired fromt with such Und shall not bfor drafting ao coordinate On the US d and a utilitontractor co
he Contractores to sign thento an executL and CRALd that any prcumstances wess when ex
A can take upxhibits that ris would alloon/justificatioith the utility
roject has haace investigaing design pad the potentiamanent Lighe shown on t
Work and shauctures, and uding similaaccurately a
Additio
rk orders/no-impacted ut
nts for Buy AURA) will nnd requireme
ility Agreemm a Utility OUtility Ownebe responsiband negotiatie with such U36 D/B projty has been iordinate witr has tried to
e No Conflicted URA. S
Ls) that referrotections unwhere the precuting URA
p to two yearrefer to provow for the Con to docum
y matrix.
ad difficulty ation has beeackage submal impacts tohting Designthe plans. “Tll include exall other exi
ar language uand cross dis
Acr
onal Requeste
-conflicts wotility (i.e. ma
America andneed to have ents.
ments) states Owner withoer. The Contble for negoting the agre
Utility Owneect we have identified onth the utility o coordinate ct/Work OrdSuggest inclur to accommnder C.R.S. 4rocurement dA’s with Utirs to executeisions of theontractor to
ment control w
getting the cen completedmittals and do utilities, den) is the onlyThe plans shxisting topogisting and prunder other Bciplinary rev
ronym List
ed Elements
ould also assanhole adjust
d utility relolanguage in
“If the Conout an agreemtractor shalltiating such aeement. The er as if it had ran into ins
n the utility mowner as if with the Utier/DRAL an
uding exhibitmodation of u
43-1-1401 ardeadlines doility Ownerse with varioue CDOT permprovide prowith regards
contractor tod. There ha
determining iesign, projecy section thathall address graphy, ROWroposed faciBook 2 Sectiview is occu
t
sist in definintment vs. tot
cation’s. Ann the URA’s
tractor idenment, CDOTl not be a paagreement. Contractor
d an executedtances whermatrix. The a utility agrility Owner,
nd CRAL bets (No-Conf
utilities withire no longer
o not allow fo. There hav
us utility owmit when a Uper project s to schedule
o update the uave been somif a utility is ct schedule, et specificallyboth tempor
W, Utilities ailities.” Mayion’s to assu
urring.
ng the type otal relocation
ny future Utthat include
tifies Utility T may enter arty to any
CDOT shalwill be d Utility
re a URA hasRFP is writeement has b and the Util
ecause they hflicts/ Work in CDOT ROapplicable.
for the lengthve been insta
wners. By URA is not
e and billing
utility base fme challenge
shown correetc. Section y states whatrary and and drainagey want to ure utilities a
49
of n on
tility es
into
ll be
s not tten been lity have
OW
hy ances
s
file es ectly
t is
e
are
US 36 ExLessons
Final: Jun
xpress LaneLearned Re
ne 2016
ATC ATMBOS BRT CDOTCLOMCPM DB DBE EIS ETC FDC HMAHPTEHOV ITP ITS MHTMOTNDC NEPAPI PCCPQA QC QMORFC RFI RFP ROD ROWRTD TDM
es Project eport
Alterna
ActiveBus onBus R
T Colora
MR Condit
Critica
Design
Disadv
Enviro
ElectroField D
A Hot ME High-P
High OInstruc
Intellig
Method
Mainte
Notice
A Nation
Public
P Portlan
Quality
Quality
O QualitRelease
Reques
Reques
Record
W Right-o
Region
Transp
ative Technic
e Traffic Man Shouldersapid Transitdo Departmen
tional Letter o
l Path Method
n-Build
vantaged Busi
nmental Impa
onic Toll CoDesign Chan
Mix AsphaltPerformanceOccupancy Vctions to Propo
gent Transpor
d of Handling
enance of Tra
of Design Ch
al Environme
Information
nd Cement Co
y Assurance
y Control
ty Managemed for Constr
st for Informa
st for Proposa
d of Decision
of-Way
nal Transporta
portation Dem
cal Concept
anagement
t nt of Transpo
of Map Revisi
d
iness Enterpri
act Statement
ollection nge
e TransportatVehicles
osers
rtation System
g Traffic
ffic
hange
ental Policy A
oncrete Pavem
ent Oversighruction
ation
als
ation District
mand Managem
ortation
ion
ise
t
ation Enterpr
ms
Act
ment
ht
ment
rise
50