Post on 23-Apr-2023
Controls on the marketing offood and non-alcoholicbeverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design
December 2020
imag
e: F
reep
ik.c
om
Acknowledgements
This publication was prepared through the support of the UNICEF Thailand Country Office. Valuable input was received from colleagues at the Bureau of Nutrition, Department of Health, Thailand, the International Health Policy Programme and WHO Thailand Office.
Lead Authors:
Kathryn Backholer, Deakin University and Fiona Sing, University of Auckland.
Technical advisory group:
Payao Phonsuk, International Health Policy Programme Thanapan Suksa-ard, WHO Thailand Office Fiona Watson, UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office.
Acronyms
HFSS High in fat, sugar and salt
NCD Non-communicable disease
UNCRC United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund
WHO World Health Organisation
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 3
Table of Contents
Executive summary 6
Part 1: Rationale for strengthening legislation on food and non-alcoholic beverage marketing in Thailand 10
1.1 Government of Thailand commitments for supporting controls on marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages 10
1.2 Non-communicable diseases and childhood overweight in Thailand 12
1.3 Dietary factors and the increase of childhood overweight in Thailand 13
1.4 Influence of food and non-alcoholic beverage marketing on children’s health 15
1.5 Evidence for HFSS food marketing in Thailand 16
1.6 Existing food and marketing regulation and legislation in Thailand 17
Part 2: Required scope of legislation to protect children from the harmful impacts of HFSS food marketing 18
2.1 Regulatory approach 18
2.2 Governance 20
Managing external stakeholders 24
2.3 Objectives 24
2.4 Key provisions 25
Definition of children 25
Definition of marketing to children 25
Definition of child-directed marketing 26
Settings, times and media covered by marketing regualtion 27
Settings-based regulation 28
Time-based regulations 31
Medium-based regulations 33
Classification of ‘permitted’ foods 36
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design4
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 5
Part 3: Monitoring, evaluation and enforcement of legislation 383.1 Monitoring overview 38
3.2 Monitoring for compliance with regulation 40
Standards and indicators 40
Responsible agencies 40
Penalties for non-compliance 42
Communication of monitoring and compliance 42
3.3 Monitoring intended impact of regulation on policy objectives 43
Identification of institution for evaluation of legislation 43
Data collection types and timelines 44
Communication of the evaluation 45
Appendix 1: Thai commitments for supporting action on HFSS food marketing 46
Appendix 2: Existing food and advertising restrictions in Thailand 48
Appendix 3: Thailand’s multi-sectoral working groups for tobacco and breast milk substitute control 50
References 51
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design6
Executive summary
The purpose of this report is to provide background evidence to the Government of Thailand as it considers the introduction of stronger controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children. The report sets out i) the rationale for strengthening legislation ii) the required scope of legislation and iii) the mechanisms for legislation monitoring, evaluation and enforcement.
Rationale for strengthening legislationThe Government of Thailand has committed to a ban on inappropriate marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages1 high in saturated fats, trans-fatty acids, free sugar and salt (HFSS) (1). This is in response to rapidly rising rates of overweight and obesity2, particularly among Thai children. Excess weight is linked to reduced educational achievements, increased risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and negative impacts on quality of life (2-4). The alarming increase in overweight violates Thailand’s commitment to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), ratified by Thailand in 1992, which states that parties should act appropriately to combat disease and malnutrition, of which overweight is one form.
The rise in childhood overweight is associated with changes in diet (5). Thailand now ranks highest among 54 low and middle income countries for adolescent fast food intake (6) and Thai sales of ultra-processed foods are rapidly increasing (7). Strong evidence shows that children who are exposed to HFSS food marketing are more likely to desire, request and eat those foods and thereby increase their total daily energy intake (8-10), leading to excess weight gain and overweight over time. Children are exposed to high volumes of HFSS food marketing every day as they go about their daily lives, through various settings, including schools, sports, supermarkets, television and the internet. The amount of
1 Food and non-alcoholic beverage food marketing will be referred to as ‘HFSS food marketing’ from herein.2 Overweight defined as a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 23.0 and 24.9kg/m2 and obesity of BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 will be collectively referred to as overweight.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design6
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 7
television advertisements for HFSS foods across 22 countries was found to be highest for Thailand (11). In the online environment, marketing by the most popular Thai food and beverage brands (across confectionery, soft drinks, and chain-restaurant foods) have been found to contravene Government regulations and industry’s self-regulatory codes of practice (12).
Thailand is a leader in global health (13) with progressive legislation restricting the marketing of tobacco and breast milk substitutes and a tiered tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Progress has been made to restrict food marketing in schools and improve the marketing on food labels. However, to adequately protect all children from HFSS food marketing and to uphold commitments to the UN Interagency Taskforce for NCDs in Thailand, controls on HFSS food marketing must be strengthened.
Recommendations for strengthening legislationThe report makes the following recommendations for strengthening legislation to control the marketing of HFSS foods and non-alcoholic beverages:
1. Adopt mandatory government legislationMandatory government legislation is more effective than government-led voluntary regulation or industry-led codes as shown by strong and consistent independent evaluations assessing the effectiveness of marketing restrictions globally (14-25).
2. Assign the Ministry of Public Health as the lead government agencyThe Ministry of Public Health has a strong mandate from the United Nations Interagency Taskforce on NCDs to lead a steering group of other relevant government agencies on the design, implementation and monitoring of the legislation. This aligns with international examples where the Ministry of Health has been the main implementing government body, along with other associated health regulatory bodies (26).
3. Set reduction in children’s exposure to HFSS food marketing as the overarching objectiveSetting clear and specific objectives that can be realistically achieved and monitored will help protect the legislation from legal challenge. It will also help the government to evaluate the effectiveness of the law against the objectives. Reducing children’s exposure to HFSS food marketing should be the overarching objective with other outcomes such as reducing purchases of HFSS food and reducing childhood overweight as secondary outcomes. Once the objectives are defined, the reach, goal and scope of the legislation can be drafted.
4. Protect all children up to 18 years of ageChildren up to 18 years old must be protected from HFSS food marketing in line with the UNCRC. Younger and older children are exposed to large volumes of HFSS food marketing, which has shown to increase preference and consumption of targeted products among all children up to 18 years of age (8, 9). Younger children do not have the cognitive ability to interpret the persuasive intent of marketing (27) and older children are particularly vulnerable to marketing that promotes products that provide immediate gratification (28, 29).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design8
5. Include all marketing of HFSS foods regardless of target audience Legislation should cover all marketing that children are exposed to, regardless of the intended audience or whether it is ‘directed to’ children or not. Children and adults share many of the same physical spaces, communication platforms and exposure times (11, 30-32). Legislation that is narrowly focused on marketing that is ‘directed to children’ will not adequately protect children from all HFSS marketing to which they are exposed (33).
6. Implement comprehensive legislation covering all settings, times and media channels when children are exposed to marketing of HFSS food and beveragesAll marketing strategies including advertising, sponsorship, direct marketing (e.g. mail, text), product placement and branding, and product packaging should be covered by the legislation. This can be achieved by applying a settings-based, time-based or media-based approach to legislation. Evidence from tobacco and breast milk substitute marketing controls shows that when limited settings or channels are subject to legislation, companies shift their marketing practices from regulated to unregulated media, which undermines the legislation’s impact (34).
7. Restrict HFSS food marketing in all settings where children are present These settings-based restrictions should include:
a) Child-centred settings
Child-centred settings include, but are not limited to, schools, early childhood settings, playgrounds, family and child services, children’s sports sponsorship and cultural activities. Thailand’s Ministry of Education recently (11 June 2020) announced a Notification to ban marketing of all types for foods and beverages in educational institutions. It will be important that this is implemented in full and that regulations are extended to cover the environment around schools and in other settings where children gather.
b) Public spaces, public transport and public events
Marketing in public spaces, on public transport or at public events (e.g. sponsorship or advertising at sporting and cultural events) is highly visible to children as they go about their daily lives and, in most instances, cannot be avoided. Urban areas of Thailand have large volumes of traffic, supporting a strong outdoor advertising sector. Banning the marketing of HFSS foods in these spaces will require action on publicly-owned and privately-owned advertising space.
c) Retail environments
Retail marketing strategies influence children’s consumption through ‘pester power’ which describes children’s relentless requests to parents for marketed food items, and by attracting the attention of older children and adults thereby increasing unplanned or impulse purchases (35-37). Key marketing strategies include product displays in prominent locations (e.g. end-of-aisle, check-out or free-standing displays) and messaging on product packages (36), in addition to price promotions and free tastings.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 9
8. Restrict HFSS food marketing across all broadcast media between the hours of 6am and 12am (midnight)A time-based restriction on the marketing of HFSS foods during the hours that children are viewing broadcast media, including television, cinema and radio, is important to capture the full exposure of children to such marketing.
9. Ban HFSS food marketing across non-digital and digital platformsA whole-of-medium based restriction to HFSS food marketing should be applied to all non-digital and non-broadcast mediums and all digital media when there are mixed-use audiences. Marketing through digital media channels needs to include on-line marketing, which involves a large network of stakeholders (30, 38) and rapid spread of information. Existing mechanisms to protect children (e.g. on-line age verification) are inherently weak and largely ineffective (39). This is particularly important as internet usage is increasing year-on-year among Thai children and youth (40).
10. Categorise food and drink as ‘permitted’ or ‘not permitted’ for marketing based on a robust classification systemThe legislation should be underpinned by an objective and easy-to-use system that classifies foods and beverages as ‘permitted’ (healthy) or ‘not-permitted’ (unhealthy) to be marketed. The Thai nutrient profile model (41) can be used as a starting point as it has been developed based on recommendations from the WHO and tested against other international systems. Marketing using master brand logos, without food items or alongside healthier foods, for brands primarily associated with HFSS foods (e.g. fast food restaurants) should also be banned as evidence shows this type of marketing increases HFSS food consumption (42, 43).
11. Monitor and evaluate the legislation using an independent government agency and robust enforcement mechanismsOnce legislation is implemented, it should be regularly monitored to ensure compliance and to evaluate its effectiveness against the stated objectives. Monitoring, evaluation and enforcement, should be coordinated by an independent government agency with other agencies that are free of conflicts of interest given powers to carry out monitoring and enforcement on that agency’s behalf. Agencies may include government departments, regional departments for local monitoring or civil society groups. Strong enforcement mechanisms, such as fines and prohibitions should be used to ensure compliance.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design10
Part 1:Rationale for strengthening legislation on food and non-alcoholic beverage marketing in Thailand
Overview
Part 1 of this report outlines the rationale for protecting children from the harmful impacts of HFSS food marketing in Thailand. Part 1 is divided into six sections:
1.1 Existing commitments
1.2 NCDs and overweight
1.3 Dietary factors and overweight
1.4 Influence of HFSS marketing
1.5 Evidence for HFSS food marketing
1.6 Existing food and marketing regulation and legislation in Thailand
1.1 Government of Thailand commitments for supporting controls on marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages
Thailand’s commitment to banning the inappropriate marketing of HFSS foods is evidenced in the Government of Thailand’s Framework for Co-operation developed to implement the recommendations arising from the United Nations Interagency Taskforce on NCDs visit in 2018 (1). Recommendation 4.4 states:
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design10
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 11
‘Ban inappropriate marketing of unhealthy food and beverages to children and implement the Act on Control of Marketing of Infant and Young Child Food’
To implement recommendation 4.4, the framework states:
‘Draft regulation to ban inappropriate marketing of unhealthy food and beverages to children be developed.’
This is in addition to many other international resolutions and frameworks that Thailand has signed up to, which call for marketing restrictions (Appendix 1). These commitments reflect the alarming increases in overweight and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Thailand over the past 10-20 years (44) and the recognition that HFSS food marketing influences children’s diets in a negative way, leading to excess weight gain and life-long ill-health (2-4).
Definitions of marketing, HFSS foods, and marketing exposure and power
Marketing: The WHO defines marketing as ‘any form of commercial communication of messages that are designed to, or have the effect of, increasing the recognition, appeal and/or consumption of particular products and services - it comprises anything that acts to advertise or otherwise promote a product or service’ (45). This broad definition of marketing is intended to cover the wide breadth of marketing strategies, including, but not limited to, advertising, sponsorship, direct marketing (e.g. mail, text), product placement and branding and product packaging. Although it is not explicitly stated in the WHO Set of Recommendations on the Marketing of Foods and Non-alcoholic Beverages to Children (46), marketing also encompasses the promotion of brands (usually the only marketing element for sponsorship), as brand loyalty awareness is one of the mechanisms through which marketing increases HFSS food consumption.
HFSS foods and non-alcoholic beverages: Foods and non-alcoholic beverages considered to be harmful to health due to the high content of saturated fat, trans-fatty acids, free sugars or salt (often referred to as ‘unhealthy’ foods and beverages). These are the target foods and beverages for food marketing policies and, throughout this document, are collectively referred to as HFSS foods.
Marketing exposure and power: The impact of marketing is a function of exposure and power (45). Exposure refers to the reach (how many people are exposed to given marketing message or campaign over a specified period) and frequency (how many times people are exposed). Power refers to the content, design and execution of the marketing message (e.g. using techniques of cartoon characters or celebrities, use of competitions or games).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design12
1.2 Non-communicable diseases and childhood overweight in Thailand
Overweight and NCDs are rising at alarming rates in Thailand. This is leading to increased early deaths, illness and is having a profound impact on the economy. NCDs account for 74% of all deaths in Thailand, with most deaths caused by cardiovascular diseases, cancers, chronic respiratory disease and diabetes (44). Overweight, a key risk factor driving Thailand’s rapidly rising burden of NCDs, increased sharply for school-aged children (6-14 years) from 4.9% in 2009 to 13.9% in 2014. Similar increases were observed for pre-school aged children (1-5 years) rising from 5.6% in 2009 to 11.4% in 2014 (Figure 1)(7).
Figure 1: Prevalence of overweight and obesity among Thai children between 1995 and 2014. Source: Wichai Aekplakorn et al. The 5th National Health & Examination Survey 2014: Child Health. Health System Research Institute, Nonthaburi 2018.
Childhood overweight is associated with reduced educational achievements and negative impacts on quality of life (2-4). In 2016, conservative estimates of the costs of obesity (BMI≥25m2) in Thailand were US$0.8-2 billion (0.20-0.37% of Thailand’s Gross Domestic Product) (46). Children who are overweight are more likely to become overweight adults (47), with lifelong health and economic consequences. This alarming increase in overweight violates Thailand’s commitment to the UNCRC (ratified by Thailand in 1992), which states that parties should act appropriately to combat disease and malnutrition, of which overweight is one form.
5.7 5.5 5.6
11.4
2.33.3
4.9
13.91-5 years
1995 2001 2009 2014
6-14 years
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 13
5.7 5.5 5.6
11.4
2.33.3
4.9
13.91-5 years
1995 2001 2009 2014
6-14 years
NCDs and obesity as risk factors for COVID-19
Increasing evidence demonstrates that obesity is associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 complications and hospital admission (48) , intensive care surveillance (48) and a need for invasive mechanical ventilation (49). Building resilient populations to the ongoing threat of COVID-19 and other future pandemics will require prioritisation and implementation of strong comprehensive policies to reduce population levels of obesity and NCDs.
1.3 Dietary factors and the increase of childhood overweight in Thailand
Strong evidence indicates that poor diets are the major cause of overweight among children (50). Excess consumption of HFSS foods combined with inadequate consumption of fruit, vegetables and whole grains, contribute to one in five deaths globally (51). Dietary risk factors drive excess weight gain, leading to overweight and obesity and increased risk of NCDs (52). For example, a strong relationship exists between consumption of a poor diet and premature death (53, 54), diabetes (53-56), cardiovascular disease (53-56), cancer (53, 54, 56-58), in addition to excess weight gain (53, 56, 59, 60).
Data from Thailand demonstrates a positive relationship between HFSS food consumption and children’s body weight. A cross-sectional study of 263 children aged 10–12 years from Bangkok Metropolitan Region found that overweight or obese children were more likely to consume greater quantities of flavoured milk, sugary drinks, street-side snacks (e.g. light meals, local mixed dishes, or local/Western fast food sold by street-side vendors and road-side shop) and confectionary compared to normal weight Thai children (5).
Thailand has undergone a significant nutritional transition over the past 30 years, which has seen a shift from the consumption of traditional diets with high fibre and low fat content towards Western diets characterised by HFSS content and convenience (61). Sales of highly processed HFSS foods and beverages have increased with per capita sales volume of soft (sweet) drinks, savoury and sweet snacks and breakfast cereals increasing steadily between 2013 and 2019 and are projected to continue to rise in the near future (7). In 2019, the Thai population purchased an average of 166 litres of soft drinks (approximately 3 litres, per person, per week including bottled water which is classified as a soft drink by Euromonitor International) (7). Thailand now ranks among the highest Asian countries with regard to consumption of processed convenience foods and reliance on ‘ready meals’ (7). Similarly, a 2020 study ranked Thailand highest among 54 low and middle income countries for adolescent fast food intake, with an estimated 43% of Thai adolescents consuming fast food 4-7 days per week with a mean frequency of 4 times per week (6) (Figure 2).
Rapidly changing diets and the steep increase in childhood overweight in Thailand warrants urgent action. Whilst many factors have contributed to changes in the diet of the Thai population, the high levels of marketing of HFSS food are a key concern (19).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design14
Figure 2: Frequency of fast-food consumption among adolescents 12-15 years. Source: Li et al, 2020 (6).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 15
1.4 Influence of food and non-alcoholic beverage marketing on children’s health
Marketing of HFSS foods increases children’s consumption of these products and total energy intake. HFSS food marketing is ubiquitous around the world (62, 63). Children are constantly exposed to HFSS food marketing as they go about their daily lives, through various settings, including schools, sports, supermarkets, television, the internet and many other settings. Sophisticated marketing techniques, the many and varied communication channels through which marketing is disseminated and the rise of personalised and targeted marketing through digital platforms means the marketing of HFSS foods has never been so prominent and influential.
Research evidence consistently demonstrates that exposure to, and the power of, HFSS food marketing increases consumption of HFSS foods and beverages (8). This occurs by influencing children’s awareness and preferences for products (9, 10), increasing brand loyalty (28, 30), reinforcing the normalisation of HFSS food consumption (9, 64, 65) and by undermining food literacy (66). This in turn increases purchasing of HFSS foods among youth who have independent purchasing power and encourages younger children to relentlessly request the marketed foods (pester power), which undermines parent’s desires and intentions to provide their children with healthy nutritious food (67). Evidence also shows that the increase in HFSS foods that occur shortly after exposure to HFSS marketing (8) is not compensated for later in the day, which means total daily energy intake is also increased (28). This is important as excess energy intake ultimately leads to excess weight gain and overweight (58). As demand for HFSS food increases, market competition increases, and thus the marketing ecosystem is intensified (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Pathway of effects between HFSS food marketing and weight gain and diet-related disease. Blue boxes are supported by direct evidence, green boxes by indirect evidence. All stages of the pathway contradict the UNCRC (ratified by Thailand in 1992) that all children have the right to enjoy the highest attainable standard of health and that parties should act appropriately to combat disease and malnutrition.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design16
1.5 Evidence for HFSS food marketing in ThailandEvidence from Thailand demonstrates high volumes of HFSS food marketing on television and through online social media platforms.
A 2014 nationwide audit of food advertising on Free TV including channels 3, 5, 7, MCOT, and Digital TV including 3 Family, LOCA and MCOT Family), in Thailand found that the majority of food items advertised were classified as non-core, meaning HFSS foods (11). On average, Free TV aired 2.9 non-core food advertisements per hour, per channel, with sugary drinks the most commonly advertised food product (11). For Digital TV, non-core food advertisements were aired on average once per hour, per channel. The rate of non-core food advertising was higher during weekends compared to weekdays (11). A later international benchmarking study found that, across 22 countries, there was on average four times more TV advertisements for HFSS foods or beverages per hour (‘not permitted’ according to the WHO nutrient profiling system) compared to healthier (‘permitted’) items, and that this rate was highest for Thailand with 58 advertisements for HFSS foods and beverages for each single advertisement for a healthier item (63). The most frequently advertised foods in Thailand were beverages (carbonated soft drinks, mineral water, and flavoured waters), ready-made foods and dishes, chocolate and confectionary and yoghurts or sour milks.
Although TV has traditionally been the primary means by which children are exposed to food marketing, increasingly marketing is being complemented by digital mediums. A recent study assessed the marketing of the most popular food brands with young people in Thailand (covering confectionery, soft drinks, and chain-restaurant foods) on Facebook. The study found that none of the food and beverage Facebook brand pages complied with Government of Thailand’s regulations or industry’s self-regulatory codes of practice (12).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 17
1.6 Existing food and marketing regulation and legislation in Thailand
While progress has been made in some areas of HFSS food regulation in Thailand and there is legislation to control the marketing of other harmful commodities, such as tobacco and breast milk substitutes, existing policies do not adequately protect all children from HFSS food marketing.
The current legislative environment in Thailand protects younger children and parents from the marketing of breast milk substitutes, including regulating specific marketing techniques, such as using children under three in an advertisement. Food marketing in the school setting has also been addressed in the latest Notification from the Ministry of Education announced in June 2020. Broadcasting is regulated in some areas, including controls on the frequency and timing of television advertisements, but there is no specific focus on HFSS food marketing. Product packaging regulations require a Guideline Daily Amount label to be displayed and warning messages must be present on certain food labels and television advertisements to inform consumers (e.g. certain foods must display the message “consume little and exercise for good health”). Foods that contain false claims on their labels or advertisements are also regulated. Appendix 2 outlines the current regulations in place in Thailand that relate to advertising laws, restrictions on marketing in school settings, food labels and marketing of breast milk substitutes and tobacco.
New comprehensive legislation is required to regulate all types of HFSS foods in the same way, covering all of the relevant marketing media, settings and times - not just schools, labels or television advertisements featuring children - and to protect children up to 18 years old (see section 2.4 for further discussion).
The Government of Thailand now has an opportunity to make further investments in the future of their children’s health and well-being and to uphold their commitments to protect children from the harmful impacts of HFSS food marketing. The following two sections of this report outlines what a comprehensive legislative response would look like and how to implement one to remedy the gaps in the current regulatory environment. All recommendations are supported by good practice legislative examples from the East Asian and Pacific region, which are supplemented with broader international examples, where regional examples are lacking.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design18
Part 2:Required scope of legislation to protect children from the harmful impacts of HFSS food marketing
Overview
Part 2 of this report sets out the key points and recommendations for effective legislation to protect children from the harmful impact of HFSS food marketing in Thailand. The evidence underpinning each recommendation are presented together with global examples. Part 2 is divided into four sections:
2.1 Regulatory approach
2.2 Governance
2.3 Objectives
2.4 Key provisions
2.1 Regulatory approachRecommendation 1: Adopt mandatory government legislation
A mandatory approach, using a government-led legislative response, is required. This will be much more effective than self-regulatory and government-led voluntary approaches, which have been shown to be largely ineffective at reducing the exposure of HFSS food marketing to children (48-59).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design18
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 19
Definitions of regulatory mechanisms
To date, governments internationally have used a variety of regulatory mechanisms to restrict HFSS food marketing to children. They fall into three categories:
Self-regulatory approach: A collection of food and beverage companies commit themselves to restrict marketing of unhealthy products to children by setting their own guidelines or targets, independent of government.
Government-approved voluntary approach: Government provides guidelines on how companies can regulate their marketing practices and companies decide whether to comply with guidelines or not.
Mandatory approach: Legislation is passed by government to establish the general legal framework of principles to which the relevant stakeholders are required to adhere to, including regulations. A robust legal framework would also include enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance.
Effectiveness of different regulatory mechanismsStrong and consistent independent evaluations assessing the effectiveness of HFSS marketing restrictions globally have shown that mandatory approaches are more effective than government-led voluntary or industry-led regulation (14-25). For example, research in Australia found that the frequency of food advertising and children’s exposure to HFSS food marketing remained unchanged despite the implementation of industry self-regulatory pledges (20, 68). Similar results were found in Canada (22), Germany (18), Spain (14), and the US (19). This contrasts with countries that have implemented mandatory restrictions, such as South Korea and Chile. Research from South Korea found that the volume of HFSS food advertising reduced after the introduction of the Special Act on Safety Management of Children’s Dietary Life (69). Research from Chile shows that a comprehensive mandatory marketing restriction can reduce the exposure of HFSS food marketing to children, with significant decreases found in exposure to HFSS food advertising on TV and a reduction in child-directed marketing strategies on breakfast cereal packages post implementation of the statutory marketing regulation (33, 70).
A mandatory approach, using a government-led legislative response, is also required for a number of reasons. The Government of Thailand is accountable for upholding international and human rights law (such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child) and is required to implement national laws to uphold these international legal obligations. Therefore, it is the Government, not the private sector, that must design and implement marketing restrictions, as industry stakeholders are not accountable under international and human rights law (30, 71, 72).
Mandatory marketing restrictions can be accompanied with enforcement provisions such as fines. Voluntary regulation or self-regulation do not have the same level of enforcement and are therefore much less of a deterrent. Where there is little or no risk of (financial) sanction, a business may decide it is in its interests not to follow the self-regulation (72).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design20
Mandatory regulation creates a level playing field for businesses, where compliance is not left to the voluntary commitment of industry. This removes any possibility of a company attempting to gain market advantage through non-compliance (an option under voluntary or self-regulation) (30, 72).
Internationally, self-regulatory measures and industry pledges are not aligned with the WHO Set of Recommendations (they do not cover the breadth of marketing practices or adequately limit the exposure and power of HFSS advertising). Government-led mandatory mechanisms are more likely, if designed comprehensively, to ensure that the WHO Set of Recommendations are implemented (72).
2.2 GovernanceRecommendation 2: Assign the Ministry of Public Health as the lead government agency
In Thailand, there is a strong mandate for the Ministry of Public Health to carry out the recommendations of the United Nations Interagency Taskforce on NCDs and fulfil the commitments made in the Framework for Co-operation. From the wording of Recommendation 4.4 in the Framework for Co-operation, a ban on inappropriate marketing of HFSS food and beverages to children must be introduced. This is a strong starting point to consider what legislative framing is needed and what legislative objectives will fulfil this recommendation.
In other countries, the Ministry responsible for health has primarily been the main implementing government body, along with other associated health regulatory bodies, because the policy objectives have been health related. When other government departments have led policy development and implementation, these regulations have narrowed in scope. For example, broadcast legislation is often led by broadcast authorities, but this does not cover the full range of marketing of HFSS foods. A wider legislative framing is needed, which requires an implementing body that can cover the full breadth of marketing restrictions. This needs to cover retail settings, online media, brand advertising, outdoor advertising and sponsorship as part of the law, not just the traditional broadcast channels.
Table 1 outlines country examples of the legislative framing used, the lead government agencies, and legislative objectives.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 21
Tab
le 1
: Cou
ntry
exa
mpl
es o
f le
gisl
atio
n tit
les,
lead
gov
ernm
ent
agen
cies
and
legi
slat
ive
obje
ctiv
es
Lead
gov
ernm
ent a
genc
ies
Legi
slat
ive
obje
ctiv
es
Chile
Law
of N
utrit
iona
l Com
posi
tion o
f Foo
d and
its
Adv
ertis
ing (
Ley 2
0.60
6) (F
ood L
abel
ling
and
Adve
rtisi
ng L
aw) (
69)
Min
istry
of H
ealth
1. C
hild
pro
tect
ion
2. P
rom
otin
g in
form
ed s
elec
tion
of fo
od
3. D
ecre
asin
g foo
d con
sum
ptio
n with
exce
ssive
amou
nts o
f crit
ical n
utrie
nts
Irel
and
The C
hild
ren’s
Com
mer
cial C
omm
unica
tions
Co
de
Non
-Bro
adca
st M
edia
Adv
ertis
ing
and
Mar
ketin
g of
Foo
d an
d N
on-A
lcoh
olic
Be
vera
ges,
inclu
ding
Spo
nsor
ship
and R
etai
l Pr
oduc
t Pl
acem
ent:
Volu
ntar
y Co
des
of
Prac
tice
Broa
dcas
ting
Auth
ority
of I
rela
nd
Depa
rtmen
t of H
ealth
1. T
o of
fer
prot
ectio
n fo
r ch
ildre
n fro
m in
appr
opria
te a
nd/o
r ha
rmfu
l co
mm
erci
al c
omm
unic
atio
ns2.
To
ackn
owle
dge
the
spec
ial s
usce
ptib
ilitie
s of c
hild
ren
and
ensu
re th
at
com
mer
cial
com
mun
icat
ions
do
not e
xplo
it th
ese
susc
eptib
ilitie
s3.
To
ensu
re th
at c
omm
erci
al c
omm
unic
atio
ns a
re fa
ir an
d pr
esen
t the
pr
oduc
t or s
ervic
e pro
mot
ed in
a w
ay th
at is
easil
y int
erpr
eted
by ch
ildre
n an
d do
es n
ot r
aise
unr
ealis
tic e
xpec
tatio
ns o
f th
e ca
pabi
litie
s or
ch
arac
teris
tics
of th
e pr
oduc
t or s
ervi
ce b
eing
pro
mot
ed4.
To p
rovid
e una
mbi
guou
s gui
delin
es to
broa
dcas
ters
, adv
ertis
ers,
pare
nts,
guar
dian
s and
child
ren o
n the
stan
dard
s the
y can
expe
ct fr
om co
mm
ercia
l co
mm
unic
atio
ns o
n Iri
sh b
road
cast
ing
serv
ices
UK
Adve
rtisi
ng re
stric
tions
on
TV a
nd o
nlin
e fo
r pro
duct
s hig
h in f
at, s
ugar
and s
alt (
HFSS
) (p
ropo
sed
legi
slat
ion)
Rest
rictin
g pr
omot
ions
of
food
and
drin
k th
at is
hig
h in
fat,
suga
r and
salt
(pro
pose
d le
gisl
atio
n)
Depa
rtmen
t of
Hea
lth a
nd S
ocia
l Ca
re a
nd D
epar
tmen
t fo
r Di
gita
l, Cu
lture
, Med
ia a
nd S
ports
Depa
rtmen
t of
Hea
lth a
nd S
ocia
l Ca
re
1. R
educ
ing
child
ren’s
exp
osur
e to
HFS
S ad
verti
sing
, to
redu
ce ch
ildre
n’s
over
cons
umpt
ion
of th
ese
prod
ucts
2.
Driv
e re
form
ulat
ion
of p
rodu
cts
by b
rand
s 3.
Res
trict
ions
wou
ld b
e pr
opor
tiona
te a
nd ta
rget
ed to
the
prod
ucts
of
mos
t con
cern
to c
hild
hood
obe
sity
, and
lim
it th
e ad
verti
sing
chi
ldre
n se
e4.
Eas
ily u
nder
stoo
d by
par
ents
, so
that
they
can
be su
ppor
ted
in m
akin
g he
alth
y ch
oice
s fo
r the
ir fa
mili
es
Sout
h Kor
eaTh
e Spe
cial A
ct on
the S
afet
y Man
agem
ent
of C
hild
ren’s
Die
tary
Life
Min
iste
r of
Foo
d an
d Dr
ug S
afet
y, Re
publ
ic o
f Kor
eaTo
prom
ote c
hild
ren’s
heal
th by
pres
crib
ing m
atte
rs ne
cess
ary f
or su
pply
ing
safe
and n
utrit
iona
lly ba
lanc
ed fo
ods t
o equ
ip ch
ildre
n with
heal
thy e
atin
g ha
bits
Taiw
anRe
gula
tions
Gov
erni
ng A
dver
tisem
ent a
nd
Prom
otio
n of
Foo
d Pr
oduc
ts N
ot S
uita
ble
for L
ong-
term
Con
sum
ptio
n by
Chi
ldre
n
Min
istry
of H
ealth
and
Wel
fare
Taiw
an Fo
od an
d Dru
g Adm
inist
ratio
n
Aim
s to
prot
ect c
hild
ren
from
unh
ealth
y foo
d an
d ca
rry o
ut b
alan
ced
diet
s fo
r the
m
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design22
The Thailand Framework of Co-operation addressing the United Nations Interagency Taskforce recommendations identified the Ministry of Public Health supported by the Ministry of the Interior, the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission and the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society as the responsible Government agencies for drafting the marketing regulations related to HFSS foods and non-alcoholic beverages.
Table 2: Government agencies and areas of responsibility in Thailand
Note: Areas of responsibility in italic letters means that this area of regulation does not yet exist in Thailand but should be under the responsibility of the selected government agency.
While the Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, can lead the legislative process, a steering group of relevant government agencies should be set up to guide the design, implementation and monitoring of the regulation, where relevant.
Government agency Area of responsibility
Food and Drug Administration • Food labelling and packaging
• Food marketing (age limit of presenter)
• Retail advertising
Department of Health, Ministry of Public health • Nutrient or food classification
Office of The National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission
• Broadcast media (time and content)
Ministry of Education • Marketing in schools
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security • Child Rights
Office of the Consumer Protection Board • Consumer affairs/Consumer protection
Ministry of Interior • Local Government
• Town and City Planning
• Settings where children gather (public parks, playgrounds, etc.)
• Control of food marketing of contests or sweepstakes
Ministry of Transport • Transport (including public transport)
Ministry of Finance • Taxation (SSB, Salt)
Ministry of Commerce • Trade
• Price
Ministry of Digital Economy and Society • Digital marketing (including brand advertising)
Ministry of Tourism and Sports • Sport sponsorship
National NCD Steering Committees • Establish policy and implementation framework for the 5 -year national NCD prevention and control 2017-2021
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 23
Other potential government agencies may include:
• Office of Consumer Protection Board
• Food and Drug Administration
• Ministry of Social Development and Human Security
• Ministry of Education
• Department of Children and Youth
• Department of Health Services Support
• Department of Local Administration
• National Health Commission of Thailand
To aid the decision of which government agencies need to be involved in the working group it would be useful to consider what government agency is responsible for the following areas that are relevant to the comprehensive legislative response outlined in this report (73):
Ensuring the relevant government departments are engaged with the legislative design will ensure the most effective legislative approach is developed and will also increase political buy in and increase the chances of successful implementation. See Appendix 3 for an example of the types of multi-sectoral steering groups that have been set up by the Government of Thailand in relation to the control of tobacco and breast milk substitutes.
Other countries have created agreements between Ministries or agencies who need to partner on implementation and enforcement – such as broadcast agencies and the Ministries of Education. See Table 3 for a case example from Chile outlining which Government departments and agencies were involved throughout the legislative process for the Chilean Food Labelling and Advertising Law.
Table 3: Chile Case Study: who was in charge of different aspects of the legislative process
Steps Chile
Scientific evidence gathering Nutrition Department of the Ministry of Health with an academic institution and experts
Draft legislation Nutrition Department of the Ministry of Health
Consultation with stakeholders Nutrition Department of the Ministry of Health
Implementation Nutrition Department of the Ministry of Health and Regional Ministry of Health Offices
Monitor Ministry of Health regional departments and inter-sectoral network formed of representative from government, academia, NGOs, consumer associations, food marketing institutions and consumers’ rights organisations. School settings: Ministry of Health entered into an agreement with Ministry of Education by asking inspectors of the Superintendents of Education to monitor food offered within schools when carrying out their usual tasksBroadcast: Ministry of Health entered into an agreement with Television National Council to monitor broadcast
Enforcement Ministry of Health and Regional Ministry of Health Offices
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design24
Managing external stakeholdersWhen designing legislation, the government needs to consider the principles of inclusiveness and participation (two core principles of good governance) by consulting with the public and impacted third party stakeholders. It is also important to include mechanisms to shield this process from commercial interests that conflict with the legislation’s purpose – for example, the food and beverage industry who will be financially negatively impacted by such regulations. In other countries, those industries with conflicts of interest have challenged proposed marketing restrictions to prevent their businesses from being regulated by arguing the law is not necessary, or that self-regulation is effective, or that there is not enough evidence to support the legislation, amongst other things (71). Such conflicts of interest may cause delay or undermine the legislation’s impact, especially its scope and potential effectiveness.
Existing tools to help protect policymaking from commercial interference or conflicts of interest are available from the WHO (74). This includes a recommendation for an initial mapping of stakeholders and interests in the policy area, followed by a clear and transparent guidance on who can participate in the policy development process, mechanisms for disclosing interactions with an actual, perceived, or potential conflict of interest, and methods for managing these conflicts of interest. For example, during the development of its marketing restrictions, Canada adopted an openness and transparency policy, which meant that a copy of all communications received or meeting minutes held with external parties about the policy were published online (75).
2.3 ObjectivesRecommendation 3: Set reduction in children’s exposure to HFSS food marketing as the overarching objective
Effective implementation starts with setting clear objectives about what the marketing restrictions will achieve and how the restriction will operate. The WHO advises that an effective marketing regulation should have a stated objective of reducing children’s exposure to, and the persuasive power of, marketing of HFSS food to provide an important standard to measure the performance of the system (76-78). Regulatory systems are weaker if underpinned by vague objectives that are not aligned with reducing exposure and power of marketing practices (76).
Other objectives should be chosen from the short-term and intermediate outcomes on the pathway of effects between HFSS food marketing and human health (Figure 3). For example, another strong objective would be to reduce the purchase or consumption of HFSS foods. Because a strong international evidence base underpins this pathway of effect, the Government of Thailand can rely on this evidence base to demonstrate the need for the legislation. This will help protect the legislation against industry challenge, who typically argue that marketing restrictions are more restrictive than necessary or that there is not enough evidence to support the introduction of regulation and self-regulation is effective enough (71).
Longer term objectives can be identified by the Government of Thailand (for example, ‘to prevent NCDs’), but only if short- and/or medium-term outcomes have been defined. This is because it is difficult, and takes longer, to show how the legislation will meet long-term objectives without addressing the short and intermediate effects the policy will have. Once the objectives are defined, the reach, goal and scope of the legislation can be drawn up based on existing recommendations and evidence.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 25
2.4 Key provisionsRecommendation 4 of the WHO’s Set of Recommendations states that clear definitions for key terms and conditions are essential for successful and uniform policy implementation (45). This section sets out these terms and conditions, with evidence to support each recommendation. In summary, a robust regulatory system that effectively restricts exposure and power of marketing to children would address the following key components:
• Use a definition of children that protects children up to 18 years.
• Accurately capture the full extent of marketing that children are exposed to, regardless of the intended audience, in the scope of the regulation by using time- setting- and medium-based restrictions on HFSS food marketing (without defining a prescriptive list that could be interpreted as exhaustive).
• Use a robust, objective and easy-to-use system to define which food and beverages are permitted and not permitted under the regulatory framework (ensuring that brand marketing is also considered).
Definition of children
Recommendation 4: Protect all children up to 18 years of age.
The definition of children should align with the UNCRC where a child is defined as every human being below the age of 18 years unless, under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier (79). In Ireland, South Korea and the UK the definition of children under marketing regulations are up to 18 years. This definition aligns with scientific evidence. HFSS food marketing increases preference and consumption of targeted products and brands among younger and older children (up to 18 years) (9). Young children (<13 years of age) do not have the cognitive ability to interpret the persuasive intent of marketing (27). Adolescents (aged 13-18 years) are reward driven, impulsive, strongly influenced by their peers and are particularly vulnerable to marketing that promotes products that provide immediate gratification (28, 29). Adolescents of this age have their own purchasing power and purchase and consume high volumes of HFSS foods and drinks (80, 81).
Definition of marketing to children
Recommendation 5: Include all marketing of HFSS foods regardless of target audience
Regulatory scope should cover all marketing that children are exposed to, regardless of the intended audience and/or whether it is ‘directed to’ children or not.
Children and adults share many of the same physical spaces, communication platforms and exposure times (11, 30-32). As the age of children increases up to 18 years, audiences become increasingly mixed with adults and marketing that is ‘directed to children’ becomes increasingly difficult to define.
Legislation that is narrowly focused on marketing that is ‘directed to children’ can be difficult to enforce and is therefore less effective due to the complexities with different interpretations of the intended audience. For example, in 2016 Chile implemented the Food Labelling and Advertising Law, which
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design26
included a ban on advertising for foods and beverages high in sugars, fats and sodium on television programs considered to be i) ‘child-targeted’, ii) where >20% of the audience consists of children aged <14 years and iii) where advertising appeals to children by including characters, toys or other strategies considered to be ‘directed to children’ (82). Analysis of the impact of this law on television advertising revealed that, whilst the legislation resulted in a significant reduction in children’s exposure to television advertising for foods and beverages high in sugars, fats and sodium, it did not eliminate it (33). The legislation was updated in June 2018 to a time-based restriction, where all HFSS food advertising is banned on television programs between the hours of 6am and 10pm. Similar deviations of industry interpretation of ‘child-directed’ marketing with intended regulatory definitions has been noted across marketing mediums and countries (83, 84).
Legislation that focuses on children’s exposure to HFSS food marketing, rather than marketing that is ‘directed to children’, circumvents potential legal challenges by the food industry contesting what is and what is not ‘directed to children’.
Children’s exposure to HFSS food marketing consists of the communication mediums, settings and times whereby a large number of children are exposed.
Country examples of regulation that cover children’s exposure to unhealthy food marketing
Chile (2018 update): Time-based restriction on television programming aired between 6am and 10pm. Outside of these hours child-directed marketing of HFSS food is prohibited.
United Kingdom (Proposed): Television and internet 9pm watershed.
Definition of child-directed marketingWhen the requirement arises, marketing that is directed to children, should include any marketing technique that has appeal to children, including through the use of images, sounds or language designed to appeal to children such as characters or celebrities (licensed or unlicensed), children actors or voices, references to school or play, toys or book give-aways, competitions or promotional giveaways or other child-directed appeals. This definition should be upheld even if the intended audience is adults and/or if the content also appeals to adults. Marketing that occurs in settings where children gather (e.g. schools, sports etc) and that is given or sent directly to a child (e.g. through email, sms, app notification) is also considered to be directed to children. ‘Child-directed’ marketing prohibitions should be used outside of time-based, settings-based and medium-based restrictions and for food and beverage package marketing, where the content of the marketing is specifically directed to children.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 27
Settings, times and media covered by marketing regulation
Recommendation 6: Implement comprehensive legislation covering all settings, times and media channels where children are exposed to marketing of HFSS food and beverages
The WHO Set of Recommendations state that a comprehensive approach to regulation is required to adequately reduce the power and exposure of HFSS food marketing to children. International evidence shows that HFSS food marketing is highly prevalent and found across a wide range of settings and communications channels (85), which influences food choice and consumption across the life-course (9). In addition, evidence from tobacco and breast milk substitute marketing controls shows that when limited settings or channels are considered in HFSS food marketing restrictions, industry shifts their marketing spend from regulated to unregulated mediums (34).
Whilst Thailand has some marketing regulations in place, these do not adequately cover the full range of settings and communication channels required to protect children from the harmful impacts of HFSS food marketing (see section 1.5). It is recommended that the Government of Thailand develop overarching governing legislation that sets the policy objectives and covers the full range of settings and communication channels such as in the Chile Food Labelling and Advertising Law.
To adequately and effectively capture the full range of communication channels and settings, different types of design approaches are required within the regulation. These design approaches can be categorised into settings-based, time-based or medium-based restrictions. The box below defines each design approach and gives examples of the different types of marketing communication channels that fall under each. The report then goes on to detail these design approaches for all these settings and communication channels listed. A secondary, broad-based ban on all ‘child-directed’ HFSS food marketing across all marketing platforms should also be included to cover all marketing communication channels that do not easily fall into one of these three design approaches.
Definitions for settings-based, time-based and medium-based restrictions
Settings-based restrictions: total ban on HFSS marketing in specific venues and locations
• Child-centred settings (schools, child services, playgrounds, children’s sports, etc)
• Public spaces, public transport and public events
• Retail environments
Time-based restrictions: total ban on HFSS marketing between pre-specified times
• All broadcast media including television, cinemas and radio
Medium-based restrictions: total ban on HFSS marketing disseminated through specified mediums
• Non-digital, non-broadcast media with mixed-use audiences
• Digital media including online environments
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design28
Regulation should be comprehensive in that it should cover a wide range of marketing types and mediums, but it should have some flexibility in the legislation drafting to allow for additional marketing techniques to be covered (86). For example, regulatory frameworks should account for marketing drift – the changing and evolving nature of marketing practices over time – to ensure the capture of new technologies, techniques and communication channels through which children are exposed to HFSS food marketing.
If a stepped-approach is required (i.e. the broad range of marketing types and mediums cannot be legislated all at once), it is recommended that the initial focus be on settings where children gather, such as in schools and during sports, and broadcast channels (building on existing legislation and notifications) (77). Plans should be put in place to broaden the legislative scope soon after. However, it should be recognised that a stepwise approach will create gaps in the regulation and, in countries where this approach has been used, industry has been found to refocus their marketing spend on non-regulated areas, with an overall increase in marketing activity (73, 86). The broad scope of legislation in Chile has been cited as a key enabler to regulatory progress (87).
Country examples of comprehensive coverage of marketing regulation
Chile (2016): HFSS food marketing restrictions cover the use of child-directed marketing techniques across any communication channel and the advertisement of these products on children’s television programs and websites which includes time-based broadcast restrictions.
Quebec, Canada (1980, updated 2012): Under the Consumer Protection Act, it is prohibited to market any commercial product, not only foods, that is intended to appeal directly to children, to attract children’s attention and/or where the placement or timing are such that >15% of the audience is made up of children.
Settings-based regulation
Recommendation 7: Restrict all HFSS food marketing in all settings where children are present (child-centred settings, public spaces and retail environments)
A settings-based regulatory approach should be used in all child-centred settings, public places and retail environments
a) Child-centred settings
Recommendation 5 of the WHO’s Set of Recommendations states that settings where children gather should be free from all forms of HFSS food marketing (45). Further, in the 2016 WHO Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity, it was stated that “settings where children and adolescents gather and the screen-based offerings they watch, should be free of marketing of unhealthy foods and sugar-sweetened beverages” (78).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 29
Children’s settings include, but are not limited to, schools, early childhood settings, playgrounds, family and child services, children’s sports including through sponsorship and through cultural activities. Thailand’s Ministry of Education recently (11 June 2020) announced a Notification to ban promotion activities for all foods and beverages in educational institutions. It will be important that this is implemented in full and that regulations are extended to cover the environment around schools and in other settings where children gather.
Country example of regulations in settings where children gather
India (2020): Foods and beverages high in saturated fat or trans-fat or added sugar or sodium cannot be marketed on a school campus or to school children in an area within 50 meters from the school gate in any direction.
Ireland (2018): Generally, for the voluntary code of practice, locations primarily used by children should be free from all forms of marketing communication for foods high in fat, salt and sugar. Examples of such settings include registered crèches, pre-schools, nurseries, family and child clinics, paediatric services, schools, dedicated school transport, playgrounds and youth centres.
Hungary (2008): All advertising (not just food related) directed at children (<18 years) is prohibited in child welfare and child protection institutions, kindergartens, elementary schools and their dormitories.
b) Public spaces, public transport and public events
Urban areas of Thailand have large volumes of traffic, supporting a strong outdoor advertising sector. This includes billboards reaching up to 100m in length in static or digital formats. Across Thailand, adverting is also considered a key revenue generator for public transport operators and mass transit system stations are often flooded with advertisements. Marketing in public spaces, at public events (e.g. sporting sponsorship or sponsorship and advertising at cultural events) and on public transport is highly visible to children as they go about their daily lives and, in most instances, cannot be avoided.
Whilst much of the HFSS advertising in Thailand is on privately owned property, HFSS food advertising on publicly owned land or assets is under the control of the Government of Thailand and its presence undermines the public and preventive health priorities of the Government. London and Brazil are two jurisdictions that have implemented a ban specifically on publicly owned assets. Outdoor HFSS food advertising restrictions are also inherently captured in other broad-based laws, including the Chilean Labelling and Advertising Law and as part of the consumer protection legislation that several countries have in place, but these are limited to restrictions on food advertising that is considered to be child-directed, and do not cover the full extent of HFSS food marketing that children are exposed to in these settings.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design30
Country examples of regulation in outdoor spaces or on public assets
London (2019): Advertising that promotes (directly or indirectly) food or non-alcoholic drink which is high in fat, salt and/or sugar (‘HFSS’ products) is banned on all publicly owned advertising estate, including on the underground, rail, buses, overground, light railway and roads. Brands can only be included if the advertisement promotes healthy products as the basis of the advertisement.
Brazil (2016): Advertisements and sales promotions of ultra-processed food products are banned on the premises of the Ministry of Health and its entities.
c) Retail environments
Food retail outlets, formal and informal, are the settings where food is obtained for consumption immediately or for storage and later consumption. Children are exposed to these settings whilst shopping with a carer or when purchasing food for themselves.
The key retail marketing strategies that have been found to influence children include product displays in prominent locations (e.g. end-of-aisle, check-out or free-standing displays) and messaging on product packages (36), in addition to price promotions and free tastings. Numerous studies indicate that these retail marketing strategies can influence children’s consumption through ‘pester power’ which is defined as children’s relentless requests to parents or carers for marketed food items, and by attracting the attention of older children or adults, and increasing unplanned or impulse purchases (35-37). It is therefore recommended that in retail settings, a ban should be placed on the placement or authorisation of placement of HFSS food products below a height of 1 metre from the floor (e.g. young children’s eye level), within 2 metres from the point of sale (e.g. at check-outs) or in any other manner that is likely to appeal to children. The advertising of HFSS food products and brands should also be prohibited in these areas.
Product packaging for HFSS food products should also be free from any form of marketing that is directed to children (see above for definition of ‘directed to children’). Product packaging can be defined as the wrapping or box that foods and beverages are contained within for retail sale. Because purchasing decisions at point-of-sale are made fast and without a great deal of cognitive processing, the appeal of product packaging has been shown to influence purchases, particularly when the product is purchased for children (88, 89). For example, the presence of a character on food packaging has been shown to significantly increase requests for that item and results in more favourable taste and snack preferences (90, 91).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 31
Country examples of regulating food packaging
Chile (2016): Tony the Tiger, a significant Kellogg’s brand identity, was removed by Chilean marketing restrictions that ban techniques and incentives that could attract the attention of children, such as cartoons, animations and toys.
UK (proposed): The UK government has committed to legislative ban on unhealthy food price promotions. Specifically, this includes a restriction on multi-buys (buy-one-get-one-free), sale of unhealthy foods at check-outs and at shop entrances and on the sale of unlimited refills of unhealthy foods and beverages in places where they are sold to the public.
Time-based regulationsAs large numbers of Thai children are watching television at times outside of hours when ‘children’s programs’ are aired (92), a ban on all HFSS food advertising between the hours of 6am and 12am midnight is recommended to adequately protect Thai children from exposure to HFSS food marketing on television. This time-based recommendation should be extended to all broadcast media (cinema and radio) for consistency. This watershed approach has been implemented in Chile and is currently proposed in the UK (see country example).
According to the 2008 Thai Mass Media Survey (92), approximately 3.4 million (41%) Thai children aged 6-14 years watched television on weekdays between 8pm-12am midnight and almost 1.7 million (20%) Thai children watched television on weekend evenings between 8pm-12am midnight (Figure 4). These data should be updated to better understand children’s TV consumption between the hours of 8pm and 12am midnight to better inform the upper time limit of the regulation. Children are exposed to television from a young age. Results from the Prospective Cohort Study of Thai Children (260 children and parents recruited between 2000 and 2002), revealed that almost all Thai children watched television at the age of 6 months (98.0%), 12 months (95.3%) and 2 years (96.7%) (93).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design32
Figure 4: Proportion of Thai Children (6-14 years) reporting television viewing. Source: 2008 reported television viewing time data from the National Statistical Office, Ministry of Information and Communication technology and single year population counts from 2010 Census data.
Free-to-air and digital television are key platforms through which HFSS food marketing is disseminated. A 2014 nationwide audit of HFSS food advertising on Free TV (channels 3, 5, 7, MCOT between 6-10am and 3-8pm on weekends and 3-8pm on weekdays) and Digital TV (3 Family, LOCA and MCOT Family) in Thailand found that the majority of food items advertised were non-core HFSS items (11). On average, Free TV aired 2.9 non-core food advertisements per hour, per channel, with sugary drinks the most commonly advertised food product (11). For Digital TV, non-core food advertisements were aired on average once per hour, per channel. The rate of non-core food advertising was higher during weekends compared to weekdays (11).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 33
Country examples for regulation restricting HFSS food marketing on broadcast mediums
UK (proposed): Statutory ban on all foods and beverages considered to be high in fat, salt or sugar between the hours of 5.30am and 9pm.
Chile (2018 update): Statutory ban on all HFSS food advertising on television between 6am and 10pm. Outside of these hours, HFSS food advertising is not permitted on devoted children’s channels, during programs targeting children, or when children make up >20% of the audience.
Taiwan: Statutory ban on television advertising of foods high in sodium (per serving) and high in calories from fats, saturated fats or free sugar (%) on children’s channels from 5pm and 9pm.
South Korea: Statutory ban on advertising foods high in calories, total sugar, saturated fat and sodium of children’s preferred foods (thresholds defined by Korean Food and Drug Administration) before, during and after programs aired 5pm-7pm and during children’s programming.
Medium-based regulations
Recommendation 9: Ban HFSS food marketing across non-digital and digital platforms
A medium-based restriction for HFSS food marketing should be applied to any non-digital, non-broad-cast mediums, including print publications, direct mail and unsolicited documents, if it is a mixed-use medium, and to all digital media channels. For non-mixed-use media (i.e. a medium used almost exclusively by adults) then all HFSS marketing that is directed to children or designed to appeal to children should be banned.
Focused attention is now being given to HFSS food marketing on digital mediums. Restriction of digital marketing will ensure that all marketing to which children are exposed is captured within the regulation. This includes exposure on internet sites, social media platforms, apps and other digital communication channels that children use, regardless of whether they are the intended audience or not (see country example for a comprehensive digital media ban on alcohol advertising in Finland).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design34
Figure 5: Percentage of the Thai population aged 6+ who used the internet in 2014-2018, by age group. Source: 2018 household survey on the use of information and communication technology
Online marketing differs from traditional marketing – it is more targeted and personalised, highly engaging and can be virally spread, exposing large volumes of children to marketing content in a very short period. The mechanisms by which online marketing is produced and disseminated is extremely complex, involving a large network of stakeholders (including users) (30, 38). The audience across online platforms are highly mixed with regard to age, and online age verification by companies and platforms are inherently weak and largely ineffective (39). Regulations must reflect this unique online marketing environment. Internet and social media use is prevalent across all age groups in Thailand (Figure 5 and 6).
Internet usage is high and increasing year-on-year among Thai children. Approximately 80% of Thai children aged 6-19 years used the internet in 2018 (40). The majority of young people in Thailand used the internet 5-7 days per week (58.5% of children aged 6-14 years and 87.4% youth aged 15-24 years). Among the population aged 6 and over, 39.7% use the internet for approximately 2-4 hours per day with 30.5% using it for 1-2 hours per day (40). In 2018, 18% of children aged 6-9-years and 65% of 10-14-years reported engaging with social media platforms in Thailand (Figure 6), despite an age verification of 13 years required for most social media platforms. Social media use increases to 92% for those aged 15-19-years.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 35
Figure 6: Proportion of Thai population that engaged with social media platforms during 2018, by age group. Source: Data derived from ‘The 2018 household survey on the use of information and communication technology report (Quarter 1)’.
At the same time, online platforms are increasingly being used to market HFSS foods and beverages as part of a combined marketing approach. Research findings from Thailand demonstrates extensive use of social media platforms to market HFSS foods and beverages (12). Because food marketing through digital platforms is more targeted, personalized and engaging than traditional marketing channels, the adverse influence on children’s health is amplified (30). European data shows that combining online marketing with marketing on television and in cinemas can increase returns on investment by approximately 70% (94). Social media platforms claim that marketing through their platforms increase target audience reach, ad memorability, brand linkage and likeability (95).
The mechanisms for delivering paid HFSS food advertisements are extremely complex and lack transparency with neither the brand, media agency, nor publisher fully understand which advertisements have been served to whom. This, in combination with other practical challenges, makes it currently impossible to block all paid-for HFSS food advertisements to children and youth on digital platforms (62). Exposure to user-generated content (content created by members of the general public - paid or unpaid - or content that is spread through sharing, following and commenting) is also impossible to regulate once the marketing material is available in the digital ecosystem.
Because of the rapid (real-time) and wide-spread generation and spread of digital marketing, it is essential that regulatory terms and conditions are unambigous to minimise subjective interpretations and potential challenges with enforcement. The time taken to deal with such interpretation and enforcement challenges will by far surpass the time required for the marketing campaign in question to reach and impact large numbers of children and youth.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design36
It is important that all marketing techniques and digital platforms are included in regulatory design, otherwise online marketing (and marketing innovation) is likely to shift from regulated to unregulated digital mechanisms (34, 38). There is little precedent for regulating HFSS food marketing in digital mediums, however, and the need for regulation is globally recognised (62) and technical guidance is becoming increasingly available.
Country examples of regulation of digital marketing
South Korea (2010): Internet advertising, not limited to, but includes, unhealthy food, that includes “gratuitous” incentives to purchase (e.g. free toys) is prohibited.
UK (2020 proposed): To harmonise regulation of both broadcast and non-broadcast media (media neutrality) the UK has proposed to ban online unhealthy food advertising, including banner and video advertising, between 5.30am and 9pm. It is proposed that brands and marketers may be responsible for compliance and complaints for potential breach to be referred to the Advertising Standards Authority.
Finland (2015): Law prohibits use of advertising, indirect advertising or sales promotion for alcohol using online games and apps, online competitions, requests of users to share content from brand-controlled sites and social media accounts and for content intended to be virally shared. Banner and pop-up advertising is permitted if it is not aimed at children, does not contain high alcohol content and does not contain irresponsible messages. User-generated content is permitted but there must be no financial ties with the alcohol industry. Marketers cannot op-opt users to participate in the marketing process. The National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health is tasked with enforcement of regulations, with breaches of compliance largely indicated through a third-party complaints system.
Classification of ‘permitted’ foods
Recommendation 10: Categorise food and drink as ‘permitted’ or ‘not permitted’ for marketing based on a robust classification system
A key aspect of any regulatory framework is that marketing restrictions target foods and non-alcoholic beverages that have been shown to be harmful to health. The Government of Thailand should adopt a government-led and evidence based food classification system. Systems that have been developed by industry have been less strict and shown to be less effective. Food classification systems fall into two broad types: Nutrient profiling and foods-based classifications.
Nutrient profiling: The WHO South-East Asian region has developed a nutrient profile model (96) to implement the WHO Set of Recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children. This evidence based nutrient profile model provides an objective method of categorizing foods that are more likely to be constituents of a healthy diet from those that are less likely to be constituents of a healthy diet. The model was developed through three key steps: 1) pilot testing of the draft model in five Member States (India, Indonesia, Maldives, Myanmar and Sri Lanka) by comparing
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 37
it to a range of foods commonly consumed by children in each country, through stakeholder discussion on the applicability, feasibility, strengths and weaknesses of the draft model in each country and alignment of the model with country’s food based dietary guidelines; 2) a technical workshop to review and finalise the model and 3) consolidation and consideration of WHO South-East Asian Member States input into the model.
The model includes nutrient thresholds for different food and non-alcoholic beverage categories as well as several food categories where all marketing, regardless of nutrient thresholds, is ‘not permitted’ (chocolate and sugar confectionery, energy bars, and sweet toppings and desserts; cakes, sweet biscuits and pastries; other sweet bakery wares, and dry mixes for making such; juices; energy drinks; edible ices). Similarly, there are categories where all items are ‘permitted’ (fresh and frozen meat, poultry, fish and similar; fresh and frozen fruit, vegetables and legumes). The WHO nutrient profile models have been found to be stricter in which foods and beverages are classified as ‘not permitted’ compared to other nutrient profile models so would permit fewer products to be marketed to children (97), than systems developed by industry (31). It is recommended that this model is used as a guide and adapted and tested to reflect the Thai country context.
The Thai nutrient profile model (41) has been developed to align with the WHO nutrient profile model and can be used as a starting point for classification of foods and non-alcoholic beverages under food marketing legislation. When tested against other international systems, the Thai nutrient profile model performed well (41), but must be tested with a larger number, and broader range, of foods and non-alcoholic beverages for alignment with the WHO South-East Asian model. It will also be important to update the model to reflect the WHO food and beverage categories where nutrient thresholds are not applicable and blanket bans are applied. The Government of Thailand may also consider extending the non-nutrient threshold categories to sweetened beverages as evidence suggests that non-nutritive sweeteners are also likely to increase the risk of adverse health outcomes (98). These updates to the Thai nutrient profile model will be important to ensure the system adequately protects children from the marketing of all foods and non-alcoholic beverages considered to be harmful to health.
Food-based classification: The evidence for food-based classification systems (e.g. food-based dietary guidelines or level of processing) is increasing as an alternative classification system to the nutrient profile models. In fact, the WHO nutrient profile model is in effect a combination of nutrient profiling and food-based classification as there are whole category bans for some food categories. Classifying foods according to the level of processing is associated with poorer diet quality and adverse health outcomes (99), regardless of the nutrient content of foods and beverages. This is important as emerging evidence shows that in countries where a nutrient profile model has been used to classify foods and beverages, there has been an increase in the use of artificial sweeteners and other artificial ingredients so that products can fall under nutrient thresholds and can then be marketed (100).
Inclusion of brands: Classification of what is ‘not permitted’ under marketing restrictions should also include Master brands that are primarily associated with HFSS food products (regardless of whether a food and/or beverage product is marketed alongside the brand). Brand marketing for brands that are strongly associated with HFSS foods (e.g. for quick service restaurants or confectionary) has been shown to increase reward pathways in the brain and to increase selection and consumption of HFSS products (42, 43). Brands can be classified as ‘permitted’ or ‘not permitted’ by assessing the top five selling items by market share against the food classification system – if the majority of these products are classified as ‘not permitted’, then the master brand should also be prohibited from marketing.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design38
Part 3:Monitoring, evaluation and enforcement of legislation
Overview
Part 3 of this report outlines the steps required for a robust monitoring system to ensure compliance with the regulation and to evaluate the effectiveness of the regulation over time. Part 3 is divided into three sections:
2.1 Monitoring overview
2.2 Monitoring for compliance with the regulation
2.3 Monitoring intended impact of regulation on objectives
3.1 Monitoring overviewRecommendation 11: Monitor and evaluate the legislation using an independent government agency and robust enforcement mechanisms.
Monitoring marketing restrictions after policy implementation is important for two reasons. Firstly, to ensure companies are complying with the legislation and being penalised for breaching the law. Secondly to ensure the regulation is effective at meeting its objectives, having the intended impact and to review any loopholes in the legislation.
The Government of Thailand should forecast and allocate an appropriate budget to support ongoing monitoring, which should be reviewed periodically so that monitoring can be sustained over time.
Table 5 summarises the types of data to be collected, the frequency that data should be collected, the agencies responsible and the actions to be taken after analysis of monitoring data.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design38
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 39
Tab
le 5
: Sum
mar
y of
mon
itorin
g fo
r co
mpl
ianc
e an
d ev
alua
tion
Mon
itori
ng in
tent
Type
of d
ata
colle
cted
Freq
uenc
y of
da
ta c
olle
ctio
nA
genc
ies
resp
onsi
ble
Act
ions
from
m
onito
ring
Com
plia
nce
with
re
gula
tion
Audi
t of m
arke
ting
prac
tices
of a
dver
tiser
s ac
ross
all
med
ium
s/se
tting
s co
vere
d by
legi
slat
ion:
•
Insp
ectio
ns o
f sc
hool
s, s
ports
and
oth
er s
ettin
gs r
egul
ated
(e
nsur
e di
vers
e re
pres
enta
tion
acro
ss u
rban
and
reg
iona
l lo
catio
ns a
nd a
reas
of h
igh
and
low
soc
ioec
onom
ic s
tatu
s)
•
Mon
itorin
g of
bro
adca
st m
edia
•
Mon
itorin
g of
soc
ial m
edia
and
oth
er d
igita
l for
ms
•
Mon
itorin
g of
reta
il pr
actic
es
Ongo
ing
Info
rmed
by
annu
al m
onito
ring
of p
olic
y ob
ject
ives
Inde
pend
ent c
ompl
aint
s ag
ency
Vary
ing
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts (e
duca
tion,
br
oadc
astin
g et
c)
Regi
onal
dep
artm
ents
for
loca
l mon
itorin
g
Civi
l soc
iety
gro
ups
&
NGO
s
Sanc
tions
for b
reac
hes
of
regu
latio
ns
Iden
tifica
tion
and
rect
ifica
tion
of lo
opho
les
in re
gula
tions
Inte
nded
impa
ct o
f re
gula
tion
on th
e po
licy
obje
ctiv
es
Audi
t of m
arke
ting
prac
tices
acr
oss
all m
ediu
ms/
setti
ngs
(rega
rdle
ss o
f wha
t is
cove
red
by le
gisl
atio
n to
mon
itor s
hifts
in
mar
ketin
g to
unr
egul
ated
med
ium
s):
•
Insp
ectio
ns o
f sc
hool
s, s
ports
and
oth
er s
ettin
gs r
egul
ated
(in
clud
ing
anal
ysis
of s
ub-g
roup
diff
eren
ces,
e.g
by
leve
l of
soci
oeco
nom
ic d
isad
vant
age)
•
Mon
itorin
g of
bro
adca
st m
edia
•
Mon
itorin
g of
soc
ial m
edia
and
oth
er d
igita
l for
ms
Nat
iona
l die
tary
inta
ke s
urve
ys fo
r cha
nges
in H
FSS
food
inta
ke
Hous
ehol
d sa
les
data
for c
hang
es in
HFS
S pu
rcha
sing
Mar
ketin
g sp
end
of m
ajor
food
bra
nds
and
com
pani
es (c
an b
e ob
tain
ed th
roug
h m
anda
tory
repo
rting
as
part
of le
gisl
atio
n)
Cros
s-bo
rder
mar
ketin
g pr
actic
es
Prio
r to
polic
y im
plem
enta
tion
(for b
asel
ine
data
)
Ever
y 12
to 2
4 m
onth
s (w
ith
addi
tiona
l ev
alua
tion
for a
ll po
licy
amen
dmen
ts)
Gove
rnm
ent A
genc
ies
(Min
istry
of P
ublic
Hea
lth,
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion,
M
inis
try o
f Int
erio
r, M
inis
try o
f Soc
ial
Deve
lopm
ent a
nd H
uman
Se
curit
y, M
inis
try o
f Dig
ital
Econ
omy
and
Soci
ety,
Offic
e of
Con
sum
er
Prot
ectio
n Bo
ard,
etc
), IH
PP
Acad
emic
col
labo
rato
rs
com
mis
sion
ed b
y le
ad
agen
cy
Nat
iona
l Sta
tistic
al O
ffice
s
Iden
tifica
tion
and
rect
ifica
tion
of a
ny
regu
lato
ry lo
opho
les
to
impr
ove
inte
nded
impa
ct
Com
mun
icat
e re
gula
tory
ef
fect
iven
ess
to
stak
ehol
ders
and
pub
lic
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design40
3.2 Monitoring for compliance with regulationIn keeping with recommendation 10 of the WHO Set of Recommendations, marketing restrictions should include a monitoring system to ensure compliance with the legislation, using clearly defined indicators (45). Recommendation 9 of the WHO Set of Recommendations, notes that the regulation should specify enforcement mechanisms and establish systems for their implementation (45). This should include clear definitions of sanctions for violations of the legislation and a system for monitoring compliance. The administrative body in charge of enforcement should possess a wide range of enforcement sanctions and the full mandate to carry out the enforcement function. It is important that monitoring and enforcement is independent, transparent and free from any commercial influence (101).
When monitoring for compliance, the Government of Thailand can take the following steps:
Step 1: Develop standards and indicators for compliance with the legislation and ensure these are readily available for industry bodies.
Step 2: Identify responsible agencies.
Step 3: Define penalties for non-compliance and mechanisms for enforcement.
Step 4: Develop methods for communicating findings to stakeholders and the public.
Standards and indicatorsStandards and indictors should align with definitions derived from the regulatory terms and conditions so that ‘permitted’ and ‘not permitted’ marketing practices are clearly understood. Doing so will increase the effectiveness of the monitoring and auditing process. Standardised data collection templates should be developed to ensure consistency across media, settings and data collectors.
Responsible agenciesTwo forms of monitoring should be put in place: government-led monitoring and a public complaint’s system. Adequate resources should be allocated to establish and maintain the monitoring system and ensure resources are sufficient to carry out ongoing monitoring. It is important that a complaints system is not the only mechanism to monitor compliance because the onus should not be placed on the public to enforce government legislation by carrying out the monitoring function. Moreover, the process from complaint to judgement to action can take considerable time, at which point the marketing message has already had its intended effect which is particularly relevant for digital media.
Government led monitoring
A mandatory ban on marketing of HFSS food to children requires the government to carry out its own compliance monitoring to ensure that industries are complying with the law. This requires ongoing auditing of marketing practices across all media and settings covered by the legislation. Monitoring compliance of comprehensive legislation will be extensive, and it is recommended that monitoring responsibilities are devolved to regional departments and agencies in coordination with civil society groups, when appropriate (e.g. schools, sports, retail) and integrated into existing systems (e.g. with food safety audits of schools). For broadcast and digital media, periodic random audits should be conducted of broadcast media during the regulated hours and an audit of a cross section of digital media to check for breaches of the regulation. The Government of Thailand could also introduce legal mechanisms to compel regulated industries to disclose data on their marketing spend on brands or products that fall under the regulation and their related marketing practices. This would increase industry accountability and reduce the resources required by the Government to monitor marketing practices.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 41
Public complaints system
Most countries that have restrictions on marketing of HFSS foods have a complaints system in place where the public can identify examples of marketing that potentially breach the regulation in place and file a complaint with a designated complaints-handling body. The complaints-handling bodies manage the complaints process by taking the decision to a Complaints Board or an advisory panel who make a decision on whether the complaint will be upheld and the industry body responsible penalised.
A complaints-handling scheme should be independent and credible so that the public feel confident using it and so that any amendments can be made to improve the system. Publishing the decisions on each complaint ensures the system is transparent and that a series of precedents can be developed to help understand the regulatory schemes’ terms and conditions.
Case examples of monitoring for compliance
Chile: In Chile, regional departments of the Ministry of Health are tasked with monitoring the implementation of the regulations co-ordinating with an inter-sectoral network including government agencies, academia, civil society, consumer associations, food marketing and consumers’ rights organisations. Recent reports state that 3,000 inspections had been made of food distribution companies, supermarkets, food processors, schools, cinemas, and different media such as TV, internet, radio, street advertising, magazines and newspapers. The government found that 70% of the inspections made complied with the regulations. In relation to broadcast media monitoring, the Ministry of Health and the Television National Council have entered into an agreement, where the Television National Council provide the Ministry of Health with the following information: all content broadcast between 6am and 12am for all open and paid TV channels targeting at a young audience; information specifically aimed at identifying audiences under 14 years old; information about the advertising offered on channels split by block time, day of the week, type of product and hours of advertising.
Canada: Health Canada is considering putting in place reporting obligations that would compel industry to provide data on advertising practices on a scheduled basis.
United Kingdom: The Advertising Standards Authority has primary responsibility for ensuring compliance with the restrictions on food advertising to children contained in the 253 codes within the Committee of Advertising Codes and the UK Code of Broadcast Advertising. The Advertising Standards Authority undertakes spot checks on advertising in all media and conducts surveys of advertisements published by sectors where there is unsatisfactory compliance with the codes.
International: An international toolkit (102) has been developed to monitor continued inappropriate promotion of breast milk substitutes in violation of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. It is used by 10 countries including Thailand (Brazil, Chile, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Nigeria, Panama, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Uruguay).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design42
Penalties for non-compliance A range of enforcement mechanisms including incentives to encourage compliance and strict measures such as fines should be used to increase compliance (76) . Penalties can take the following formats and must be expressly stated and defined in the governing legislation (103):
• Name and shame the offending company in media and on public websites.
• Requiring the offending company to modify or withdraw their marketing campaign.
• Make any offending company pass a pre-clearance of further advertisements before using them.
• Prohibit an offending company from using a particular communication channel, like broadcast television, for a specific time period.
• Prohibit an offending company from marketing or selling a product for a specific time period.
• Suspend or revoke the license of the broadcaster.
• Prosecution – criminal or civil charges for company officers or company directors.
• Impose monetary fines for infringement, with different levels of severity graded for seriousness of breach or repetition of non-compliance, so that they are effective and dissuasive. The size of the fine could be proportionate to the global turnover of the entity or corporate group that has violated the restrictions, or as above could be applied to individuals for corporate offences.
• Criminal liability including imprisonment.
Case examples of penalties for non-compliance
Chile: enforcement provisions for the Food Labelling and Advertising Law include penalties for violation, reprimands, fines, and prohibition from selling the advertised product, and, in the UK, persistent violators can be fined or have their broadcasting license withdrawn for non-compliance with broadcast regulations.
South Korea: advertisers who breach the regulations are liable to fines up to ten million won (270,000 Baht)
Communication of monitoring and compliance It will be important that the Government of Thailand fund and implement a system to communicate the complaints system and its mechanics, including educational materials on how to use the complaints system, to community groups and organisations. Communication of violations to the law to stakeholders and the public will be important for ongoing engagement and to encourage continued ownership of the issue.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 43
Case example of communicating monitoring and compliance
Philippines: The Department of Health has partnered with World Vision to establish a system for communicating violations of the Milk Code with stakeholders and the public using mobile application and text messages.
3.3 Monitoring intended impact of regulation on objectivesRecommendation 11 of the WHO Set of Recommendations states that policy frameworks should include a system to evaluate the impact and effectiveness of the legislation to meet the overall policy objectives, using clearly defined indicators (45). This is important to understand if the legislation is having its intended effects, to identify and amend any regulatory loopholes and to communicate findings back to stakeholders and the public. The following steps can be taken by the Government of Thailand and partners to ensure a robust and comprehensive evaluation of the legislation.
Step 1: Identify an independent institution for evaluation that is free from conflict of interest.
Step 2: Evaluation institution to work with the Government of Thailand to identify data sources and to develop new methods of data collection.
Step 3: Develop a timeline for data collection and undertake data collection.
Step 4: Develop methods for communicating findings to stakeholders and the public.
Identification of institution for evaluation of legislationThe Ministry of Public Health, who has oversight of the legislation, should be responsible for ensuring that it is evaluated, but the task of evaluation should be commissioned to an independent academic institution or similar body. The appointed institution for evaluation should be free from any actual, perceived or potential conflict of interest. The Ministry of Public Health (and other relevant government departments) should work with the appointed institution to identify data sources and assist with data procurement, but should not be involved with evaluation design, analysis or interpretation of findings.
Country examples of independent policy evaluation
Mexico: The National Institute of Public Health Mexico, along with other academic institutions, civil society and the Ministry of Health are currently monitoring and evaluating the effect of the sugar sweetened beverage taxes on prices, consumption and the use of fiscal revenues for obesity-related programs.
Chapel Hill: The Global Food Research Programme based at the University of North Carolina is working in partnership with the Institute of Nutrition and Food Science at the University of Chile to evaluate the short and long term outcomes of the Food Labelling and Advertising Law.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design44
Data collection types and timelinesThe appointed institution should work with government bodies to identify specific, quantitative, measurable and reliable indicators for the evaluation. Data may be pre-existing (e.g. household purchase data, national dietary surveys), newly reported (e.g. the legislation may stipulate mandatory reporting of marketing spend and activities by all food companies on a scheduled basis (62) ) or newly collected (audit of marketing practices using standardized tools and protocols (104)). The incorporation of mandatory reporting requirements of marketing spend and practices by the food industry will substantially reduce the resources required for monitoring and will provide a mechanism for industry accountability. Regardless of the regulatory scope, monitoring and evaluation should capture a wide breadth of marketing mediums, settings and times to monitor shifts from regulated to unregulated mediums, settings and times.
Baseline data, prior to evaluation, should be collected as soon as possible after the legislation is announced, with repeated data collection at 12, 24 and 36 months, using the same tools and indicators to enable comparable data. Indicators for the evaluation should be chosen along the policy pathway of effect (Figure 3) and should capture the stated objective of the legislation. It is not appropriate to solely evaluate the effectiveness of the legislation based on overweight rates, as this is a long-term outcome in the pathway of effect. If the evaluation includes analysis of outcomes at the long-term end of the policy pathway (e.g. prevalence of overweight) it is important to allow sufficient lag time for impacts to occur (3+ years) and to recognise that the mechanisms causing overweight are highly complex with many drivers and therefore impact is likely to be small. This has been illustrated by tobacco control regulation, where a comprehensive approach, covering many different drivers, has been essential to the decline in smoking rates and improvements in heart and lung disease over time (105).
Monitoring of the legislation should also consider cross-border marketing (as per WHO recommendation 8) and ensure the effectiveness of the legislation is not compromised by food marketing in bordering nations (45).
Country examples of amending regulatory loopholes after policy evaluation
Hungary: Public health experts from the Ministry of Health, National Institute for Health Development, National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science, the Ministry of Finance, and WHO worked together to design a sugar sweetened beverage tax policy and together saw it through several revisions after implementation. The refinements of the policy ensured the tax was having optimal impacts on product reformulation after it was identified that superficial modifications were being made for tax evasion.
Chile: In the initial 2016 Labelling and Advertising Law only TV advertising considered to be ‘child-directed’ was restricted. This was updated in 2018 to time-based restriction of all HFSS food marketing between 5.30am and 10pm.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 45
Communication of the evaluationThe Government of Thailand should communicate all evaluation results to stakeholders and the public to maintain ongoing support for the policy and to provide explanation of any regulatory refinement that may occur to remedy any inconsistencies or inefficiencies in the legislation.
The results of the evaluation can also be included in the Government of Thailand’s reporting to the Committee of the Rights of the Child in each UN Convention of the Rights of the Child reporting cycle.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design46
App
endi
x 1:
Tha
i com
mitm
ents
for s
uppo
rting
act
ion
on H
FSS
food
mar
ketin
g
Nam
e an
d da
te o
f com
mitm
ent
Det
ails
of c
omm
itmen
t
1992
(rat
ified
by
Thai
land
) UN
Con
vent
ion
on th
e Ri
ghts
of t
he C
hild
(38,
39)
The
UN C
onve
ntio
n on
the
Righ
ts o
f the
Chi
ld is
the
mos
t rat
ified
hum
an ri
ghts
trea
ty in
the
wor
ld (r
atifi
ed b
y al
l bu
t tw
o UN
Mem
ber S
tate
s). S
tate
s tha
t hav
e ra
tified
the
Conv
entio
n ha
ve th
e le
gal o
blig
atio
n to
fulfi
l the
righ
t of
the
child
to e
njoy
the
high
est a
ttain
able
sta
ndar
d of
hea
lth a
nd th
at p
artie
s sh
ould
act
app
ropr
iate
ly to
com
bat
dise
ase
and
mal
nutri
tion.
Artic
le 2
4 of
the
Conv
entio
n st
ates
that
:
‘all
child
ren
have
the
right
to e
njoy
the
high
est a
ttain
able
sta
ndar
d of
hea
lth. S
tate
s sh
ould
com
bat d
isea
se a
nd
mal
nutri
tion
and
prov
ide
acce
ss to
ade
quat
e an
d nu
tritio
us fo
ods
and
clea
n dr
inki
ng w
ater
.’
It al
so re
quire
s th
at a
ll pa
rent
s an
d ch
ildre
n:
‘hav
e ac
cess
to e
duca
tion
and
are
supp
orte
d in
the
use
of b
asic
kno
wle
dge
of c
hild
hea
lth a
nd n
utrit
ion…
’
and
that
:
‘sta
te p
artie
s sh
all t
ake
all e
ffect
ive
and
appr
opria
te m
easu
res
with
a v
iew
to a
bolis
hing
trad
ition
al p
ract
ices
pr
ejud
icia
l to
the
heal
th o
f chi
ldre
n.’
2010
(ado
pted
by
Thai
land
)W
orld
Hea
lth O
rgan
izatio
n (W
HO) S
et o
f Re
com
men
datio
ns o
n th
e M
arke
ting
of F
ood
and
Beve
rage
s to
Chi
ldre
n
In M
ay 2
010,
Mem
ber S
tate
s (in
clud
ing
Thai
land
) of t
he W
orld
Hea
lth A
ssem
bly u
nani
mou
sly e
ndor
sed
the
Wor
ld
Heal
th O
rgan
izatio
n (W
HO) S
et o
f Rec
omm
enda
tions
on
the
Mar
ketin
g of
Foo
d an
d Be
vera
ges
to C
hild
ren
) to
redu
ce th
e ex
posu
re a
nd th
e po
wer
of m
arke
ting
of fo
ods
high
in s
alt,
suga
r and
fat t
o ch
ildre
n (W
HA63
.14)
(30)
.
2013
(ado
pted
by
Thai
land
)W
HO G
loba
l Act
ion
Plan
for t
he P
reve
ntio
n an
d Co
ntro
l of N
CDs
2013
-202
0 (4
0)
Incl
udes
a c
omm
itmen
t to
halt
the
rise
of o
besi
ty b
y 20
25.
2017
WHO
pub
lishe
d th
e ‘B
est B
uys’
out
linin
g th
e re
com
men
ded
inte
rven
tions
for m
eetin
g th
e Gl
obal
Act
ion
Plan
(41)
.
In th
e 20
17 ‘B
est B
uys’
list
, im
plem
entin
g th
e W
HO S
et o
f Rec
omm
enda
tions
on
unhe
alth
y fo
od m
arke
ting
is
reco
mm
ende
d as
an
over
arch
ing/
enab
ling
actio
n.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 47
Nam
e an
d da
te o
f com
mitm
ent
Det
ails
of c
omm
itmen
t
2014
(end
orse
d by
Tha
iland
)Ro
me
Decl
arat
ion
- UN
Dec
ade
of A
ctio
n on
N
utrit
ion
and
Fram
ewor
k fo
r Act
ion
to g
uide
the
Decl
arat
ion’s
impl
emen
tatio
n at
the
Seco
nd
Inte
rnat
iona
l Con
fere
nce
on N
utrit
ion
ICN
2 (4
2).
In 2
014,
Mem
ber S
tate
s en
dors
ed th
e Ro
me
Decl
arat
ion
for t
he U
N D
ecad
e of
Act
ion
on N
utrit
ion
whi
ch s
tate
s th
at im
prov
emen
ts in
diet
and n
utrit
ion r
equi
re re
leva
nt le
gisl
ativ
e fra
mew
orks
for a
void
ing i
napp
ropr
iate
mar
ketin
g an
d pu
blic
ity o
f foo
ds a
nd n
on-a
lcoh
olic
bev
erag
es to
chi
ldre
n. It
sta
tes
gove
rnm
ents
sho
uld
prot
ect c
onsu
mer
s,
espe
cial
ly c
hild
ren,
from
inap
prop
riate
mar
ketin
g an
d pu
blic
ity o
f foo
d.
Reco
mm
enda
tion 4
0 of t
he Fr
amew
ork f
or A
ctio
n sta
tes:
Reg
ulat
e the
mar
ketin
g of f
ood a
nd no
n-al
coho
lic be
vera
ges
to c
hild
ren
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith W
HO S
et o
f Rec
omm
enda
tions
.
2015
(ado
pted
by
Thai
land
)Su
stai
nabl
e De
velo
pmen
t Goa
ls (4
3, 4
4)Th
e Su
stai
nabl
e De
velo
pmen
t Goa
ls (S
DGs)
are
an
impo
rtant
inte
rnat
iona
l mea
sure
that
gov
ernm
ents
mus
t wor
k to
war
ds a
chie
ving
. The
goa
ls in
clud
e ta
rget
s on
endi
ng m
alnu
tritio
n in
all
its fo
rms (
whi
ch in
clud
es o
besi
ty a
s wel
l as
und
ernu
tritio
n) in
SDG
2.2
and
redu
cing
pre
mat
ure
deat
h fro
m d
iet r
elat
ed N
CDs i
n SD
G 3.
4. H
eads
of S
tate
and
go
vern
men
ts, i
nclu
ding
Tha
iland
, hav
e co
mm
itted
to d
evel
opin
g na
tiona
l res
pons
es to
the
over
all i
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
the
SDGs
, and
rest
rictin
g th
e m
arke
ting
of fo
ods
is a
n im
porta
nt p
olic
y op
tion
to m
eet t
he S
DGs.
2016
(ado
pted
by
Thai
land
)St
rate
gic
Actio
n Pl
an to
redu
ce th
e do
uble
bu
rden
of M
alnu
tritio
n in
Sou
th-E
ast A
sia
Regi
on 2
016–
2025
(SEA
/RC6
9/R5
) (45
).
In S
epte
mbe
r 201
6, M
embe
r Sta
tes
of th
e Re
gion
al C
omm
ittee
, inc
ludi
ng T
haila
nd, e
ndor
sed
a re
solu
tion
on th
e St
rate
gic A
ctio
n Pl
an to
redu
ce th
e do
uble
bur
den
of M
alnu
tritio
n in
Sou
th-E
ast A
sia
2016
–202
5 (S
EA/R
C69/
R5)
. Al
igne
d with
the t
imef
ram
e for
the W
HO G
loba
l Act
ion P
lan a
nd th
e UN
Dec
ade o
f Act
ion o
n Nut
ritio
n, th
e res
olut
ion
prov
ides
gui
danc
e to
ena
ct le
gisl
atio
n/re
gula
tions
and
impl
emen
t act
ions
to p
rom
ote
nutri
tious
food
s to
redu
ce
unde
rnut
ritio
n an
d ov
erw
eigh
t an
d ob
esity
am
ong
wom
en a
nd c
hild
ren
and
to im
plem
ent
the
WHO
Set
of
Reco
mm
enda
tions
.
2016
WHO
Com
mis
sion
on
Endi
ng C
hild
hood
Obe
sity
(E
CHO)
(46)
In 2
016,
the
WHO
rele
ased
its
final
repo
rt fro
m it
s Co
mm
issi
on o
n En
ding
Chi
ldho
od O
besi
ty (E
CHO)
. Rec
ogni
sing
th
e co
mpl
ex n
atur
e of
obe
sity
, the
ECH
O re
port
outli
ned
a co
mpr
ehen
sive
, int
egra
ted
pack
age
of re
com
men
datio
ns
to a
ddre
ss c
hild
hood
obe
sity
acr
oss
six
area
s. O
n th
e to
pic
of fo
od m
arke
ting
to c
hild
ren
the
repo
rt st
ated
:
‘Any
atte
mpt
to ta
ckle
chi
ldho
od o
besi
ty s
houl
d…in
clud
e a
redu
ctio
n in
exp
osur
e of
ch
ildre
n to
, and
the
pow
er o
f, m
arke
ting’
The
Com
mis
sion
urg
ed M
embe
r Sta
tes
to im
plem
ent t
he W
HO S
et o
f Rec
omm
enda
tions
.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design48
App
endi
x 2:
Exi
stin
g Fo
od a
nd a
dver
tisin
g re
stric
tions
in T
haila
ndTh
e fo
llow
ing
tabl
e ou
tline
s th
e cu
rren
t re
gula
tions
in p
lace
in T
haila
nd t
hat
rela
te t
o ad
vert
isin
g la
ws,
res
tric
tions
on
mar
ketin
g in
sch
ool
sett
ings
, fo
od la
bels
and
mar
ketin
g of
bre
ast
milk
sub
stitu
tes
and
toba
cco.
Thi
s is
to
unde
rsta
nd t
he m
arke
ting
and
food
land
scap
e ac
ross
di
ffere
nt a
reas
of
conc
ern
in T
haila
nd.
Type
Nam
e D
escr
iptio
n
Adv
ertis
ing
Food
and
Dru
g Ad
min
istra
tion
Not
ifica
tion
rega
rdin
g Ru
les
on A
dver
tisin
g Fo
ods
B.E.
2551
(200
8)
Rest
ricts
the
abili
ty to
adv
ertis
e fa
lse
clai
ms a
bout
food
s inc
ludi
ng o
n fo
od la
bels
. The
Not
ifica
tion
stat
es th
at p
rese
nter
s in
TV
adve
rtise
men
ts, p
artic
ular
ly fo
r jel
ly, m
ust n
ot b
e m
edic
al o
r pub
lic
heal
th e
xper
ts o
r chi
ldre
n un
der t
hree
yea
rs o
ld (i
nsta
nt je
lly a
nd je
lly c
andy
) or 1
2 ye
ars
old
for
(inst
ant j
elly
and
jelly
from
glu
com
anna
n).
Thai
Pub
lic B
road
cast
ing
and
Tele
visi
on
Busi
ness
Act
B.E
. 255
1 (2
008)
This
Act
gov
erns
the
dura
tion
and
frequ
ency
of t
elev
isio
n ad
verti
sing
that
is a
llow
ed p
er h
our,
per
day,
on b
oth
free
and
paid
tele
visi
on c
hann
els.
Thi
s Ac
t doe
s co
ver a
ll fo
od p
rodu
cts,
but
ther
e ar
e no
spec
ific r
ules
on th
e fre
quen
cy of
HFS
S fo
od ad
verti
sem
ents
. It st
ates
that
in th
e cas
e of n
eces
sity
to
pro
tect
child
ren
and
yout
hs, t
he C
omm
issi
on m
ay p
resc
ribe
in th
e N
otifi
catio
n th
e br
oadc
ast t
ime
for c
erta
in c
ateg
orie
s of
pro
gram
mes
.
Not
ifica
tion
on C
riter
ia a
nd P
roce
dure
s for
Ch
art L
ist i
n Br
oadc
astin
g B.
E. 2
556
(201
3)Re
gula
tes
the
broa
dcas
ting
times
for c
hild
ren’s
, you
th a
nd fa
mily
pro
gram
mes
, whe
re c
hild
ren
are
defin
ed a
s be
low
15
year
s ol
d an
d yo
uth
as b
elow
18
year
s ol
d. T
his
Not
ifica
tion
does
not
con
trol
food
and
non
-alc
ohol
ic b
ever
age
adve
rtisi
ng d
urin
g th
ese
prog
ram
mes
.
Scho
ol s
ettin
gsN
otifi
catio
n of
the
Min
istry
of
Educ
atio
n Re
: Mea
sure
s and
App
roac
hes t
o En
hanc
e Kn
owle
dge a
nd S
kills
Rela
ted t
o Ora
l Hea
lth
Care
and
Sel
ectio
n of
Den
tal S
ervi
ces
(Ann
ounc
ed o
n 11
Jun
e 20
20)
Intro
duce
s a ba
n on m
arke
ting p
rom
otio
n act
iviti
es of
all t
ypes
of fo
ods a
nd be
vera
ges i
n edu
catio
nal
inst
itutio
ns. S
choo
ls a
re a
lso
aske
d to
avo
id s
ellin
g su
gary
drin
ks w
ith a
hig
h su
gar c
onte
nt (m
ore
than
5%
) as
wel
l as
swee
t and
cris
py s
nack
s an
d av
oid
mak
ing
them
ava
ilabl
e fo
r con
sum
ptio
n in
ed
ucat
iona
l ins
titut
ions
, and
pro
mot
e un
ders
tand
ing
amon
g re
tail
shop
s rig
ht o
utsi
de th
e sc
hool
co
mpo
und
to g
ain
coop
erat
ion
from
sel
lers
.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 49
Type
Nam
e D
escr
iptio
n
Food
labe
lsM
inis
teria
l Not
ifica
tion
(B.E
. 255
0) (2
007)
on
“Lab
ellin
g of C
erta
in Pr
e-co
oked
Rea
dy-
to-e
at F
ood”
Stat
es th
at re
ady-
to-e
at fo
od an
d ext
rude
d sna
ck ad
verti
sem
ents
mus
t dis
play
text
or vo
ice m
essa
ges
incl
udin
g “C
onsu
me
little
and
exe
rcis
e fo
r go
od h
ealth
”. T
his
regu
latio
n do
es n
ot c
over
sug
ar-
swee
tene
d dr
inks
and
HFS
S fo
od p
rodu
cts
othe
r th
an r
eady
-to-e
at f
oods
and
sna
cks.
Als
o,
adve
rtise
men
ts o
f the
se fo
od p
rodu
cts o
n te
levi
sion
mus
t hav
e a
war
ning
mes
sage
with
clea
r sou
nd
and
text
for a
t lea
st fi
ve s
econ
ds.
Not
ifica
tion o
f the
Min
istry
of Pu
blic
Hea
lth
(No.
394
) B.E
.256
1 (2
018)
(foo
d la
belli
ng)
Nut
ritio
n la
belli
ng la
ws h
ave
been
impl
emen
ted
in T
haila
nd w
hich
requ
ire fo
od p
rodu
cts t
o di
spla
y a G
uide
line D
aily
Am
ount
labe
l tha
t pro
vide
s the
cons
umer
with
the i
nfor
mat
ion o
n the
ener
gy, s
ugar
, fa
t and
sodi
um co
nten
t of t
he fo
od. T
he FD
A sp
ecifi
es th
at ce
rtain
food
s mus
t inc
lude
the
text
“eat
m
oder
ate
and
exer
cise
for h
ealth
” to
incr
ease
con
sum
er a
war
enes
s.
Bre
ast M
ilk
Subs
titut
eCo
ntro
l of M
arke
ting
Prom
otio
n of
Infa
nt
and
Youn
g Ch
ild F
ood
Act (
B.E.
256
0)N
o pe
rson
(inc
ludi
ng m
anuf
actu
rers
, pro
duce
rs a
nd d
istri
buto
rs) c
an a
dver
tise
food
for i
nfan
ts. T
his
incl
udes
(but
is n
ot li
mite
d to
) offe
ring
prom
otio
ns, p
rizes
, spo
nsor
ship
and
dis
coun
ts.
Toba
cco
Toba
cco
Prod
ucts
Con
trol A
ct B
.E. 2
560
(201
7)N
o pe
rson
(inc
ludi
ng m
anuf
actu
rers
, pro
duce
rs a
nd d
istri
buto
rs) c
an a
dver
tise
or co
nduc
t mar
ketin
g co
mm
unic
atio
ns o
f tob
acco
pro
duct
s. T
his
ban
incl
udes
:
(1)
tele
visi
on m
ater
ial,
mov
ie, r
adio
bro
adca
st, r
adio
tel
evis
ion,
ele
ctro
nic
med
ia, c
ompu
ter
netw
ork
syst
em o
r adv
ertis
emen
t bill
(2)
in th
eatre
, mov
ie th
eatre
or s
how
, gam
e, co
ntes
t, co
mpe
titio
n, se
rvic
e pr
ovis
ion
or a
ny o
ther
ac
tivity
in th
e sa
me
natu
re
(3)
in a
ny o
ther
med
ia o
r lo
catio
n us
ed f
or a
dver
tisem
ent
or m
arke
ting
com
mun
icat
ions
as
pres
crib
ed a
nd a
nnou
nced
by
the
Min
iste
r upo
n re
com
men
datio
n of
the
Com
mitt
ee.
This
incl
udes
spo
nsor
ship
and
reta
il di
spla
ys.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design50
App
endi
x 3:
Th
aila
nd’s
mul
ti-se
ctor
al w
orki
ng g
roup
s fo
r to
bacc
o an
d br
east
milk
su
bstit
ute
cont
rol
The
follo
win
g ta
ble
outli
nes
the
diffe
rent
mul
ti-se
ctor
al w
orki
ng g
roup
s th
at a
re e
stab
lishe
d in
the
legi
slat
ion
for t
he G
over
nmen
t of T
haila
nd’s
co
ntro
l of
toba
cco
and
brea
st m
ilk s
ubst
itute
s
Bre
ast M
ilk S
ubst
itute
s To
bacc
o
•
Dire
ctor
-Gen
eral
of t
he D
epar
tmen
t of C
hild
ren
and
Yout
h,
•
Dire
ctor
-Gen
eral
of t
he D
epar
tmen
t of H
ealth
,
•
Dire
ctor
-Gen
eral
of t
he D
epar
tmen
t of H
ealth
Ser
vice
s Su
ppor
t,
•
Dire
ctor
-Gen
eral
of t
he D
epar
tmen
t of L
ocal
Adm
inis
tratio
n,
•
Secr
etar
y Ge
nera
l of t
he C
onsu
mer
Pro
tect
ion
Boar
d,
•
Secr
etar
y Ge
nera
l of F
ood
and
Drug
Adm
inis
tratio
n,
•
Secr
etar
y Ge
nera
l of
the
Nat
iona
l Bro
adca
stin
g an
d Te
leco
mm
unic
atio
ns
Com
mis
sion
,
•
Secr
etar
y Ge
nera
l of N
atio
nal H
ealth
Com
mis
sion
of T
haila
nd; a
nd
•
Perm
anen
t Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Ban
gkok
Met
ropo
litan
Adm
inis
tratio
n.
•
Perm
anen
t Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Min
istry
of F
inan
ce,
•
Perm
anen
t Sec
reta
ry of
the M
inist
ry of
Soc
ial D
evel
opm
ent a
nd H
uman
Sec
urity
,
•
Perm
anen
t Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Min
istry
of T
ouris
m a
nd S
ports
,
•
Perm
anen
t Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Min
istry
of A
gric
ultu
re a
nd C
oope
rativ
es,
•
Perm
anen
t Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Min
istry
of C
omm
erce
,
•
Perm
anen
t Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Min
istry
of I
nter
ior,
•
Perm
anen
t Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Min
istry
of J
ustic
e,
•
Perm
anen
t Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Min
istry
of L
abou
r,
•
Per
man
ent S
ecre
tary
of t
he M
inis
try o
f Edu
catio
n,
•
Com
mis
sion
er G
ener
al o
f the
Roy
al T
hai P
olic
e,
•
Secr
etar
y Ge
nera
l of t
he N
atio
nal H
ealth
Sec
urity
Offi
ce; a
nd
•
Man
ager
of t
he T
hai H
ealth
Pro
mot
ion
Foun
datio
n.
References
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 51
1. World Health Organization. Joint Mission of the United Nations Interagency Task Force on the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. 2018.
2. Black N, Johnston DW, Peeters A. Childhood Obesity and Cognitive Achievement. Health Econ. 2015;24(9):1082-100.
3. Chen LJ, Fox KR, Ku PW, Wang CH. A longitudinal study of childhood obesity, weight status change, and subsequent academic performance in Taiwanese children. J Sch Health. 2012;82(9):424-31.
4. Telford RD, Cunningham RB, Fitzgerald R, Olive LS, Prosser L, Jiang X, et al. Physical education, obesity, and academic achievement: a 2-year longitudinal investigation of Australian elementary school children. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(2):368-74.
5. Boonchoo W, Takemi Y, Hayashi F, Koiwai K, Ogata H. Dietary intake and weight status of urban Thai preadolescents in the context of food environment. Prev Med Rep. 2017;8:153-7.
6. Li L, Sun N, Zhang L, Xu G, Liu J, Hu J, et al. Fast food consumption among young adolescents aged 12–15 years in 54 low- and middle-income countries. Global Health Action. 2020;13(1).
7. UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office. The Market for Highly Processed Food and Drink Thailand Report. 2020.
8. Boyland EJ, Nolan S, Kelly B, Tudur-Smith C, Jones A, Halford JC, et al. Advertising as a cue to consume: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acute exposure to unhealthy food and nonalcoholic beverage advertising on intake in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(2):519-33.
9. Smith R, Kelly B, Yeatman H, Boyland E. Food Marketing Influences Children’s Attitudes, Preferences and Consumption: A Systematic Critical Review. Nutrients. 2019;11(4).
10. Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G. The extent, nature and effects of food promotion to children: a review of the evidence to December 2008. Geneva: WHO Press; 2009.
11. Jaichuen N, Vandevijvere S, Kelly B, Vongmongkol V, Phulkerd S, Tangcharoensathien V. Unhealthy food and non-alcoholic beverage advertising on children’s, youth and family free-to-air and digital television programmes in Thailand. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):737.
12. Jaichuen N, Vongmongkol V, Suphanchaimat R, Sasiwatpaisit N, Tangcharoensathien V. Food Marketing in Facebook to Thai Children and Youth: An Assessment of the Efficacy of Thai Regulations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(7).
13. Tuangratananon T, Wangmo S, Widanapathirana N, Pongutta S, Viriyathorn S, Patcharanarumol W, et al. Implementation of national action plans on noncommunicable diseases, Bhutan, Cambodia, Indonesia, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Viet Nam. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(2):129-41.
14. Leon-Flandez K, Rico-Gomez A, Moya-Geromin MA, Romero-Fernandez M, Bosqued-Estefania MJ, Damian J, et al. Evaluation of compliance with the Spanish Code of self-regulation of food and drinks advertising directed at children under the age of 12 years in Spain, 2012. Public Health. 2017;150:121-9.
15. Roberts M, Pettigrew S, Chapman K, Miller C, Quester P. Compliance with children’s television food advertising regulations in Australia. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:846.
16. Ronit K, Jensen JD. Obesity and industry self-regulation of food and beverage marketing: a literature review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(7):753-9.
17. Jensen JD, Ronit K. The EU pledge for responsible marketing of food and beverages to children: implementation in food companies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(8):896-901.
18. Effertz T, Wilcke AC. Do television food commercials target children in Germany? Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(8):1466-73.
19. Clark H, Coll-Seck AM, Banerjee A, Peterson S, Dalglish SL, Ameratunga S, et al. A future for the world’s children? A WHO-UNICEF-Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):605-58.
20. King L, Hebden L, Grunseit A, Kelly B, Chapman K, Venugopal K. Industry self regulation of television food advertising: responsible or responsive? Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6(2-2):e390-8.
21. Vergeer L, Vanderlee L, Potvin Kent M, Mulligan C, L’Abbe MR. The effectiveness of voluntary policies and commitments in restricting unhealthy food marketing to Canadian children on food company websites. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019;44(1):74-82.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design52
22. Kent MP, Dubois L, Wanless A. Food marketing on children’s television in two different policy environments. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6(2-2):e433-41.
23. Galbraith-Emami S, Lobstein T. The impact of initiatives to limit the advertising of food and beverage products to children: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2013;14(12):960-74.
24. Chambers SA, Freeman R, Anderson AS, MacGillivray S. Reducing the volume, exposure and negative impacts of advertising for foods high in fat, sugar and salt to children: A systematic review of the evidence from statutory and self-regulatory actions and educational measures. Prev Med. 2015;75:32-43.
25. Harris JL, LoDolce M, Dembek C, Schwartz MB. Sweet promises: Candy advertising to children and implications for industry self-regulation. Appetite. 2015;95:585-92.
26. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. Sobre Composicion Nutricional de los Alimentos y su Publicidad. Ley Num. 20.606 (Law no. 20.606) [in Spanish] [Available from: https://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma¼1041570
27. Bargh JA, Ferguson MJ. Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychol Bull. 2000;216(6):925-45.
28. Pechmann C, Levine L, Loughlin S, Leslie F. Impulsive and Self-Conscious: Adolescents’ Vulnerability to Advertising and Promotion. American Marketing Association. 2005;24(2):202-21.
29. Freeman B, Kelly B, Vandevijvere S, Baur L. Young adults: beloved by food and drink marketers and forgotten by public health? Health Promot Int. 2016;31(4):954-61.
30. World Health Organization Europe. Evaluating implementation of the WHO set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children: progress, challenges and guidance for next steps in the WHO European Region. WHO. 2018.
31. McAndrew FT, Jeong HS. Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;28(6):2359-65.
32. Harris JL, Sarda V, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Redefining “child-directed advertising” to reduce unhealthy television food advertising. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4):358-64.
33. Dillman Carpentier FR, Correa T, Reyes M, Taillie LS. Evaluating the impact of Chile’s marketing regulation of unhealthy foods and beverages: pre-school and adolescent children’s changes in exposure to food advertising on television. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(4):747-55.
34. Munafo M. Tobacco Marketing by Stealth. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(6):1389.
35. Sigurdsson VS, H.; Foxall, G. Brand placement and consumer choice: An in-store experiment. Journal of Applied Behaviour. 2009;42:741-5.
36. Harris JL, Webb V, Sacco SJ, Pomeranz JL. Marketing to Children in Supermarkets: An Opportunity for Public Policy to Improve Children’s Diets. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(1284).
37. Inman JJW, Ferraro R. The Interplay among Category Characteristics, Customer Characteristics, and Customer Activities on in-Store Decision Making. Journal of Marketing. 2009;73:19-29.
38. World Health Organization. Tackling food marketing to children in a digital world: trans-disciplinary perspectives: Children’s rights, evidence of impact, methodological challenges, regulatory options and policy implications for the WHO European Region. Geneva; 2016.
39. Hastings G, Sheron N. Alcohol marketing: grooming the next generation: children are more exposed than adults and need much stronger protection. BMJ. 2013;346:f1227.
40. Thailand National Statistical Office. The 2018 household survey on the use of information and communication technology report (Quarter 1) 2017 [Available from: http://www.nso.go.th/sites/2014en/Pages/Statistical%20Themes/ICT.aspx.
41. Pongutta S, Sirichakwal P, Chittchang U, Puwastien P, Rojroongwasinkul N, Sranacharoenpong K, Inthararak P, Chongviriyaphan N, Saleephan S, Moh-Suwan L, Suthutvoravut U. (2017). Nutrient Profiling: a Tool to Strengthen Nutrition Intervention in Thailand. Journal of Health Science, 24(6), 1030-1040. Retrieved from https://thaidj.org/index.php/JHS/article/view/556.
42. Boyland EJ, Kavanagh-Safran M, Halford JC. Exposure to ‘healthy’ fast food meal bundles in television advertisements promotes liking for fast food but not healthier choices in children. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(6):1012-8.
43. Masterson TD, Stein WM, Beidler E, Bermudez M, English LK, Keller KL. Brain response to food brands correlates with increased intake from branded meals in children: an fMRI study. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019;13(4):1035-48.
44. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD) Country Profile: Thailand. 2018.
45. World Health Organization. Set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children. Geneva, Switzerland; 2010.
46. The Economist Intelligence Unit CbtArofifin. Tackling obesity in ASEAN: Prevalence, impact and guidance on interventions. 2016.
47. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The relation of childhood BMI to adult adiposity: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 2005;115(1):22-7.
48. Petrilli. M., Jones. S.A., Yang. J., Rajagopalan. H., O’Donnell. L., Chernyak. Y., et al. Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal. 2020;369:m1966.
49. Simonnet A, Chetboun M, Poissy J, Raverdy V, Noulette J, Duhamel A, et al. High Prevalence of Obesity in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020;28(7):1195-9.
50. Swinburn BA, Jolley D, Kremer PJ, Salbe AD, Ravussin E. Estimating the effects of energy imbalance on changes in body weight in children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(4):859-63.
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design 53
51. Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L, Anderson HR, Bachman VF, Biryukov S, Brauer M, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386(10010):2287-323.
52. Mozaffarian D, Hao T, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(25):2392-404.
53. Cordain L, Eaton SB, Sebastian A, Mann N, Lindeberg S, Watkins BA, et al. Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005;81(2):341-54.
54. Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, Cornaby L, Ferrara G, Salama JS, et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1958-72.
55. Micha R, Shulkin ML, Peñalvo JL, Khatibzadeh S, Singh GM, Rao M, et al. Etiologic effects and optimal intakes of foods and nutrients for risk of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses from the Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group (NutriCoDE). PLOS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0175149.
56. Nishida C, Uauy R, Kumanyika S, Shetty P. The Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation on diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: process, product and policy implications. Public Health Nutrition. 2004;7(1a):245-50.
57. Norat T, Chan D, Lau R, Aune D, Vieira R, Corpet DJWASLRCUPRLWCRFAIfCR. The associations between food, nutrition and physical activity and the risk of colorectal cancer. 2010.
58. World Cancer Research Fund. Diet, nutrition, physical activity, and cancer: a global perspective. Continuous update project expert report. 2018.
59. Mozaffarian D, Hao T, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Changes in Diet and Lifestyle and Long-Term Weight Gain in Women and Men. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;364(25):2392-404.
60. Swinburn BA, Caterson I, Seidell JC, James WP. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of excess weight gain and obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(1a):123-46.
61. Kelly M, Banwell C, Dixon J, Seubsman SA, Yiengprugsawan V, Sleigh A. Nutrition transition, food retailing and health equity in Thailand. Australas epidemiol. 2010;17(3):4-7.
62. World Health Oragnization. Monitoring and restricting digital marketing of unhealthy products to children and adolescents. 2019.
63. Kelly B, Vandevijvere S, Ng S, Adams J, Allemandi L, Bahena-Espina L, et al. Global benchmarking of children’s exposure to television advertising of unhealthy foods and beverages across 22 countries. Obes Rev. 2019;20 Suppl 2:116-28.
64. Kelly B, Baur LA, Bauman AE, King L, Chapman K, Smith BJ. “Food company sponsors are kind, generous and cool”: (mis)conceptions of junior sports players. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:95.
65. Murphy G, Corcoran C, Tatlow-Golden M, Boyland E, Rooney B. See, Like, Share, Remember: Adolescents’ Responses to Unhealthy-, Healthy- and Non-Food Advertising in Social Media. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7).
66. National Academies of Sciences E, and Medicine Food Literacy: How Do Communications and Marketing Impact Consumer Knowledge, Skills, and Behavior? Workshop Summary. 2016.
67. Campbell S, James EL, Stacey FG, Bowman J, Chapman K, Kelly B. A mixed-method examination of food marketing directed towards children in Australian supermarkets. Health Promot Int. 2014;29(2):267-77.
68. Hebden LA, King L, Grunseit A, Kelly B, Chapman K. Advertising of fast food to children on Australian television: the impact of industry self-regulation. Med J Aust. 2011;195(1):20-4.
69. Kim S, Lee Y, Yoon J, Chung SJ, Lee SK, Kim H. Restriction of television food advertising in South Korea: impact on advertising of food companies. Health Promot Int. 2013;28(1):17-25.
70. Mediano Stoltze F, Reyes M, Smith TL, Correa T, Corvalan C, Carpentier FRD. Prevalence of Child-Directed Marketing on Breakfast Cereal Packages before and after Chile’s Food Marketing Law: A Pre- and Post-Quantitative Content Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22).
71. Fund WCR. Building Momentum: lessons on implementing robust restrictions of food and non-alcoholic beverage marketing to children. . 2020.
72. Garde A, HJeffery B, Rigby N. Implementing the WHO recommendations whilst avoiding real, perceived or potential conflicts of interest. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2017;8(2):237-50.
73. World Health Oragnization Eastern Mediterranean Region. Regulating Marketing of Food and Beverages to Children in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Implementing the WHO recommendations on marketing of food and nonalcoholic beverages to children in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. 2018.
74. World Health Oragnization. Addressing and managing conflicts of interest in the planning and delivery of nutrition programmes at country level: Report of a technical consultation convened in Geneva, Switzerland, on 8–9 October 2015. 2015.
75. Corporate Consultation Secretariat, Health Policy and Communications Branch, The Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision Making. Government of Canada. 2000. [Available from: Available at https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/abouthealth-canada/reports-publications/health-canadapolicy-toolkit-public-involvement-decision-making.html
76. Reeve BM, Regulation of Food Advertising to Children in Six Jurisdictions: A Framework for Analyzing and Improving the Performance of Regulatory Instruments. Ariz J Int Comp Law. 2018;35(71).
Controls on the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children in Thailand:legislative options and regulatory design54
77. World Health Organization. A framework for implementing the set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children. 2012.
78. World Health Organization. Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. Geneva; 2016.
79. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 [Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx.
80. Borraccino A, Lemma P, Berchialla P, Cappello N, Inchley J, Dalmasso P, et al. Unhealthy food consumption in adolescence: role of sedentary behaviours and modifiers in 11-, 13- and 15-year-old Italians. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26(4):650-6.
81. Ochola S, Masibo PK. Dietary intake of schoolchildren and adolescents in developing countries. Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;64 Suppl 2:24-40.
82. Taillie LS, Busey E, Stoltze FM, Dillman Carpentier FR. Governmental policies to reduce unhealthy food marketing to children. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(11):787-816.
83. Sing F, Mackay S, Culpin A, Hughes S, Swinburn B. Food Advertising to Children in New Zealand: A Critical Review of the Performance of a Self-Regulatory Complaints System Using a Public Health Law Framework. Nutrients. 2020;12(5).
84. World Health Organization. Evaluating implementation of the WHO set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children. Progress, challenges and guidance for next steps in the WHO European Region. Geneva; 2018.
85. Lapierre MA, Fleming-Milici F, Rozendaal E, McAlister AR, Castonguay J. The Effect of Advertising on Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140(Suppl 2):S152-S6.
86. World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic. 2019.
87. Villalobos Dintrans P, Rodriguez L, Clingham-David J, Pizarro T. Implementing a Food Labeling and Marketing Law in Chile. Health Syst Reform. 2020;6(1):1-8.
88. Chandon. P. How package design and packaged-based marketing claims lead to overeating. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2013;35(1).
89. Rettie .R., .C. B. The verbal and visual components of package design. Journal of Product and Brand Management. 2000;9(1):56-70.
90. Roberto CA, Baik J, Harris JL, Brownell KD. Influence of licensed characters on children’s taste and snack preferences. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):88-93.
91. Lapierre MA, Vaala SE, Linebarger DL. Influence of licensed spokescharacters and health cues on children’s ratings of cereal taste. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(3):229-34. s
92. Office NS. Thai Mass Media Survey 2008 [Available from: http://web.nso.go.th/en/survey/massmedia/mdia08.htm.
93. Ruangdaraganon N, Chuthapisith J, Mo-suwan L, Kriweradechachai S, Udomsubpayakul U, Choprapawon C. Television viewing in Thai infants and toddlers: impacts to language development and parental perceptions. BMC Pediatr. 2009;9:34.
94. Exploring digital ROI for FMCG brands. New York; 2013.
95. Brand awareness optimisation. In: Introducing new ways to buy, optimise and measure ads for a mobile world Facebook website post, 30 September 2015 [Available from: https://en-gb.facebook.com/business/news/Ad-Week-UK.
96. World Health Organization. WHO nutrient profile model for South-East Asia Region. 2016.
97. Brinsden H, Lobstein T. Comparison of nutrient profiling schemes for restricting the marketing of food and drink to children. Pediatr Obes. 2013;8(4):325-37.
98. Russell C, Grimes C, Baker P, Sievert K, Lawrence MA. The drivers, trends and dietary impacts of non-nutritive sweeteners in the food supply: a narrative review. Nutr Res Rev. 2020:1-67.
99. Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, Cai H, Cassimatis T, Chen KY, et al. Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake. Cell Metab. 2019;30(1):67-77 e3.
100. Quintiliano Scarpelli D, Pinheiro Fernandes AC, Rodriguez Osiac L, Pizarro Quevedo T. Changes in Nutrient Declaration after the Food Labeling and Advertising Law in Chile: A Longitudinal Approach. Nutrients. 2020;12(8).
101. World Health Oragnization. Marketing of breast-milk substitutes: national implementation of the international code, status report 2020. Geneva; 2020.
102. The netcode monitoring and assessment toolkit: protocol for ongoing monitoring systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IG.
103. UNICEF and WHO. Protecting children from the harmful impact of food marketing: practical guidance on applying a child rights-based approach. In Draft
104. World Health Oragnization. Monitoring of Marketing of Unhealthy Products to Children and Adolescents – Protocols and Templates 2020 [Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/activities/monitoring-of-marketing-of-unhealthy-products-to-children-and-adolescents-protocols-and-templates.
105. Hamann SL, Mock J, Hense S, Charoenca N, Kungskulniti N. Building tobacco control research in Thailand: meeting the need for innovative change in Asia. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10:3.