Post on 21-Apr-2023
Asension Torres
Globalizing Water and Solutions to Water Scarcity:
Alternate Perspectives; Alternate Values
Introduction
The hydrologic cycle is global and it makes water present everywhere that
people can naturally live. That means water is one of the most ubiquitous ideas
about nature that humans share. How do people understand water as a resource to
their lives, their community and their economic well-being? What ideas about our
local understanding of water scale to the global space? How is water, something
that is so fundamentally natural, globalized? These questions were the basis of my
approach to the globalization of water. Through consultation, it became clear that
my early exploratory questions could not be the basis for a thesis or research
question. Therefore the intent of my early research was to educate myself
sufficiently in order to define a research problem or gap in the available literature.
These early explorations were as much an education on water issues as they were
an education on how things are globalized.
Method
My method of approach to understanding the issues surrounding water will
be to examine books, case studies, news reports and investigative journalism,
industry advertisements, and published participant research. At a macro level,
reading the literature revealed a set of themes that didn’t respect the boundaries of
2 of 28
2
the types of literature. Ideas that were alluded to in one source were often
reinforced in another. I will apply the qualitative methods of analysis of authorship
and audience, suspending belief, coding, and textual analysis. Coding will involve
organizing and interpreting the literature surrounding water. The other methods
will be conducted by making use of Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. It is defined
as everything written (or created) that has an effect, to include groups of writings
that are shown to be commonly themed with a unified effect, and the structures of
those statements. This is differentiated from everyday speech as the aggregate of
concepts and classifications through which context is given to phenomena, and
which is produced and reproduced though an identifiable set of practices.
Discourse analysis reveals those practices. It can reveal the underlying patterns of
influence which can change according to different contexts. Therefore they are not
really patterns. If the explanations of the roots of influence change according to the
observed conditions then the explanations aren’t really objective. They are simply
expressions of the context in which the structures of discourse took form. (Waitt
2010). This method allowed me to identify the themes that produce and circulate
ideas and knowledge about the water crisis. The method allowed me to consider
the limits or rules that govern an approach to a crisis or permit one solution over
another. Through method, I observed themes that were shared among and within
the sources. These themes illustrated a set of targets for analysis. I have grouped
the literature into themes of ideas about water, water crises, solutions, and
criticisms.
3 of 28
3
Early queries to a Library catalog of “(water) AND (globalization)” provided
scholarly sources and articles, the earliest of which was from a report by Raymond
Nace in the USGS Circular 536 in 1967. This early report led to a related result in
the library search called Water in Crisis by Peter Gleick. I then searched for “Peter
Gleick” through the Amazon online store which provided highly relevant results
and recommendations. The results were provided first by the initial results list but
also by other Amazon generated results titled “Frequently Bought Together”,
“Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought”, and “What Other Items Do
Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?” I include these initial steps as they were
the central theme of a lecture and course at the University of Maryland (Linden,
Smith and York 2003). The efficiency of the associated algorithms that were
intended to aid a customer in making a book purchase, ironically allowed me to
optimally explore the case studies and issues surrounding water around the world.
Early research, readings and consultations with advisors provided some literature
and sources that began to coalesce into a question about the urgencies surrounding
water issues around the world.
Literature
From here began the formation of my eventual research question. There
were many scholarly articles, books, investigations, documentaries, and businesses
addressing the issues of water in crisis. But first I needed to understand if it was
reasonable to assume that water was valued by all people.
Ideas About Water
4 of 28
4
There are numerous examples that describe water as a substance of divine
and spiritual embodiment. “Water symbolizes the whole of potentiality: it is the
fons et origo, the source of all possible existence … water symbolizes the primal
substance from which all forms came and to which they will return” (Eliade 1979,
130). Water is a central theme of identity in Indian culture and informs Indian
people’s behaviors and practices with water. The Mahabharata, one of the Sanskrit
epics, says that
“The creator first produced water for the maintenance of life among human beings. The water enriches life and its absence destroys all creatures and plant-life.”” Charity of water is greater than charity of food. Life cannot exist without water. Charity of water means charity of life. Charity of water will lead to fame, success, long life, defeat of enemies, freedom from sins and gain of punya. Water bodies are a resting place for everybody. This includes gods, man, demigods, forefathers, demons, animals, birds and aquatic life. Charity of water will lead to the prosperity of the future generations.” (Østigård and Tvedt 2010, 2)
Water is a core element in purification rituals of Abrahamic and non-
Abrahamic religions from Shinto to Judaism to Islam (UNESCO 2005), and is a
central character in human foundation mythologies as evidenced by different
forms of flood stories (Jastrow and Clay 1920) (Doniger 2004). We baptize ourselves
in water and equate it with salvation and a divine spirit. “Truly, truly, I say to you,
unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of
God.” (John the Baptist 1546). We begin (coffee) and end (beer) our day with water,
our vacations are pilgrimages to it, and we are transfixed by waves of water
crashing on the shore. (Fishman 2011) .Speaking on behalf of many sailors, I have a
5 of 28
5
strong reaction to bodies of water and often experience an emotional pull to the
ocean, rivers and even pools (I embarrassingly admit) and have endured a deep
nostalgia from having to live so far inland.
There are numerous examples but these sufficiently espouse the irreducible
importance of water that all groups of people share which can be seen or revealed
through origin myths, beliefs systems and daily practices of life. (Doniger 2004);
(Jastrow and Clay 1920); (Østigård and Tvedt 2010). It is reasonable to assume that
water has been valued by all people. Given peoples’ ideas about water as
fundamentally natural, ubiquitous and universally valued, why and how can there
be a crisis of water?
Crises and Solutions
I sought the answer through literature that describes water crises, which
included government reports, scholarly research and participant research. The
themes of crisis have been floating in the discourse for at least 50 years, as a U.S.
policy concern (Nace 1967, 1). A U.S. government agency researcher, circa 1967,
relates the hydrologic cycle in terms of an oil barrel representing all water on earth
and a micro syringe representing water available for biological consumption.
Stemming the waste of water, managing future demand, the criticism of water as a
means of waste disposal in core countries are early propositions to answer the
limits of water availability, as well as suggesting that water pollution is an
economic issue over a health issue, and that countries in the periphery have a
water development and management shortage as opposed to simply a water
6 of 28
6
shortage. (Nace 1967). Going even further back, in the 1892 Supreme Court case
Illinois Central R. Co. v. Illinois, the Illinois state legislature granted deed for
ownership of a one-mile strip of the Chicago harbor shoreline to Illinois Central
Railroad Company. (Barlowe and Clarke 2003). The following legislature had a
different opinion on the sale and cancelled the deed. The Supreme Court decision
was based on the right of the public to maintain control of their water, as it is held
in public trust by their government. (United States Reports 1892, 40).
Such a case seems a natural development of common law and the values of
democracy. However, water as a territorial leverage or tool is evident in the
literature as well. Examples of intrastate violence at the Cauvery River in India,
conflicts between indigenous peoples of the Americas and early settlers, Israel’s
ongoing turbulence with its neighbors of Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, with whom it
shares the Jordan River basin, (Giordano, Giordano and Wolf 2002) (Wolf 1999, 8),
demonstrate the geopolitical nexus that water disputes can represent. Before Israel
was formed, the World Zionist Organization specifically addressed the desire for a
pending Jewish state to have primary control over its water resources as well as the
sources of those water flows. (Giordano, Giordano and Wolf 2002) (Wolf 1999, 8).
"Watersheds come in families; nested levels of intimacy." … " As you work upstream toward home you're more closely related. The big river is like your nation, a little out of hand. The lake is your cousin. The creek is your sister. The pond is her child. And, for better or worse, in sickness and in health, you're married to your sink." (Parfit 2003)
Today, Israel applies disparate water management and access practices,
illustrated by Israeli citizens and Israeli settlers having continued and unrestricted
7 of 28
7
access to water. The conditions are realized by denying permits for construction or
maintenance of water infrastructure, which is not enforced for Israeli settlers,
whose settlements in the occupied territories are kept connected to the Israeli
support network. Water collection systems have also suffered damage from Israeli
military air strikes and ground incursions. (Koek 2013)
From elementary school through university we learn how the hydrological
cycle is an eternally (geologically speaking) renewing process of precipitation,
evapotranspiration, percolation, stream runoff, evaporation, condensation and
precipitation (Stephens 2012) (Gallagher 2013, 7). This Gaian vascular cycle is cross
indexed with other processes of carbon and solar radiant heat transfer such that a
shift in energy of one cycle has a change in distribution or quantity of another,
“dry places will become more dry, & wet places wetter”. (Gallagher 2013, 8).
Because the hydrological process is a system/cycle, it frames water as a finite
resource to which we apply the operations of life on a “budget” (Nace 1967, 5).
This is a key description that I would draw attention to for its limited use in the
literature. It is significant in that it definitively characterizes the scarcity of water
as a crisis and it is seemingly and unexpectedly avoided throughout the rest of the
literature regardless of source.
Industrialized agriculture and its monoculture approach to food production
represent what is referred to as nonpoint pollution, which is differentiated by point
pollution such as other industrialized manufacturing. Non-point pollution also
includes logging and large-scale development. This is an obvious source of water
8 of 28
8
degradation when considering more easily identifiable and manageable human
habit of collocating with bodies of water into which people have diluted societal
waste and pollutants. (Carpenter, et al. 1998); (Office of Wetlands, Oceans and
Watersheds 2013). The conditions for pollution have persisted in spite of attempts
at legislation that may have been a response from an earlier and more ethical civil
service corps à la Raymond Nace. (Nace 1967). Consider a story related by Scott
Racek, a Supreme Court scholarly researcher, who worked on Capitol Hill and
encountered legislative bills haunted by the ghosts of dead trees due to their
encumbering thickness. He observed that the legislator did not always directly
perform the review of drafted legislation, as it was his role as a lowly staffer to
report to the member on the contents of the proposed legislation. Racek related his
knowledge about the Clean Water Act while working on a Senate Judiciary
committee and assigned to the staff of Senator Joe Biden of Delaware. The crux of
the bill was that manufacturing byproducts shall be rendered chemically inert
prior to discharge into water bodies. Dupont Chemical Co., of Delaware, was a
strong financial supporter of Biden. Understanding that Biden is publicly expected
to vote favorably on the bill, the company explicitly did not ask Senator Biden to
vote against a bill that is so obviously in line with the Senator’s constituency and
voting record, in exchange for continued campaign support. DuPont instead
proposed that they be exempted by description, without being directly named. A
continued framework of exemptions written into U.S. Code has had the effect of
creating the conditions for pollution for a nearly infinite nonpoint pollution
9 of 28
9
sources (A. Lustgarten 2013) that permit the borders of the U.S. and Mexico to
become a toxic drainage basin that not even Border Patrol agents will contact in
spite of a battery of inoculations. (M. Barlowe 2008). The conditions and precursors
for the state of our pollute-able environment aren’t strictly a result of the ability of
money to secure exemptions to legislation and access to legislators. (Racek 2010).
The literature also makes clear that nonpoint pollution is not in need of a
technological solution but in fact requires a social, political or institutional one, as
it is the sources of pollution through the use of chemical fertilizers to artificially
increase crop yields that enable the high volumes of water to be a pollutant, to a
degree that 55% of rivers and streams are in poor condition. (Carpenter, et al. 1998,
3) (Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds 2013). While industrial agriculture
is wasteful (and that waste is the medium for nonpoint pollution) - new methods of
irrigation that preserve the methodological goal of delivery while moving away
from archaic methods of ground traveling stream diversion or field channels for
providing water to croplands. In Rising City, Nebraska, a farmer named Eugene
Glock, has applied a networked array of sensors, which measure the moisture
content of the soil supporting crop development. The sensors also measure crop
canopy temperatures. With the right centralized software (that can be modified
tweaked or entirely re-written for a specific crop's needs) a pivoting overhead
sprinkler system that is integrated with the centralized software can respond to
specific and variable conditions within the crop. That can save up to two-thirds of
10 of 28
10
available water resources while also increasing the crop yield because of more
focused and responsive irrigation. (Markey, Leal and Rogers 2010, 48-50)
The source for Glock’s rotating sprinklers is an artesian well that is sourced
by the Ogallala Aquifer. (Markey, Leal and Rogers 2010, 51) Part of the landscape
for the polluting conditions has been an outdated view of groundwater and deep
aquifer geology that has not evolved for nearly 30 years. It has retained a
confidence in a theory of geologic impermeability between groundwater and
surface waters (that are the source of many reservoirs and wells) and fossilized
water located in heretofore-inaccessible geologic recesses. (Texas Railroad
Commission, Oil and Gas Division 2003); (A. Lustgarten, Injection Wells: The
Poison Beneath Us 2012) (A. Lustgarten, Poisoning the Well: How the Feds Let
Industry Pollute the Nation’s Underground Water Supply - ProPublica 2012). The
use of injection wells to sequester waste threatens to pollute sources of water that
are being depended upon more and more as surface waters become polluted.
Water crises are viewed differently in different areas but the common theme
seems to be that the solutions that people are considering are steered toward a
private answer or at least a technical answer and it’s implied, privatized licensing
or otherwise indirect ownership. I also considered how water privatization is
played out in different areas.
In the literature of solutions, the example of Saudi Arabia is presented as a
model for transplant to other non-core countries with water scarcities. Saudi
Arabia approach is to see water scarcity as an economic development issue where
11 of 28
11
the central goal is to manage a life fulfilling need. That is seen as manageable by
balancing the economic demands of oil revenue in favor of the social demands for
water. Oil money pays for water. The relationship is complexly illustrated as “an
interactive model of general equilibrium involving an aggregate petroleum
production function, the derived revenue equation, water subsidy and water
pricing.” (Choudhury 2004). Essentially the model that is proposed is that the
market demand for oil provides a predictable growth of oil revenue from which
water subsidies can be supported. This model is seen as a case from which a state
supported, privatized solution can answer water scarcity in developing countries,
and can be transposed to other regions to manage scarcity. The Saudi Arabian
approach uses desalination technology as the means to address water scarcity but
not all approaches can be attributed to desalination. The example of England and
Wales privatization of their water infrastructure makes use of a certain kind of
privatization called market environmentalism, where the solution to water
scarcities are seen as best managed through a neoliberal valuation of water. Market
environmentalism applies commodity attributes to environmental concerns. By
specifically applying to water the attributes of a product, a new framework of
solutions can materialize in answer to market demand for water availability.
(Bakker 2005). This idea also envisions global food markets as a potential way to
address localized hydrological stresses by seeing the water imbedded in food
exports as a way to transport water into areas with less available water. (Gallagher
2013, 26). The typical production of 1kg of grain uses 1KL of water. Given that
12 of 28
12
grain is easier to transport then the small quantity of water included in the grain is
brought into the local atmosphere and watershed. Selling grain or corn to Saudi
Arabia can improve their hydrological cycle because the product has water
embedded in it. That water will be added to their local water cycle by exporting it
from an area of abundance to an area of scarcity of water and the resulting
consumption offset is seen in less use in other areas of industry in the importing
country. It may even decrease societal resilience to drought. (Gallagher 2013, 27 &
31)
Through a market environmentalism lens, opportunities for alternate
technologies beyond desalination can be explored. Ric Davidge, an entrepreneur in
the water solutions industry, coordinated the exploration of using water bladders
as floating moveable catchments that could be used to transfer water via sea routes,
after being staged offshore to catch the stream flow of rivers that empty to the sea.
"Right now, there are no economic incentives to conserve," Davidge said. "The
more you use, the more you should pay. Water is essential for economic life and
freedom." (Rossi 2003).
Criticisms
Revisiting the case of Ric Davidge, reveals more than an effort at addressing
water supply opportunities. It reveals a geography of power where the Ric
Davidges of the world are jockeying for position in a new landscape of a global
market of water scarcity. Ric Davidge was a political strategist for Ronal Reagan,
Alaska Senator Ted Stevens and Alaska Governor Walter Hickel. (Snitow and
13 of 28
13
Kaufman 2007). He has served as the Secretary of the Department of the Interior
under Ronald Reagan (Snitow and Kaufman 2007), and developed a body of work
that qualified him as a proponent of market environmentalism (WaterBank 2011).
With Margaret Thatcher's move to privatize England Wales water infrastructure, a
new geography of water in the marketplace was made available to transnational
corporations. Previously only country specific or national entities, where
privatization was applied, had sought to profit from water infrastructure.
(McDowel, et al. 2009). Market actors like Ric Davidge make use of a new
landscape of water scarcity, formed by a convergence of changes in government
policy such as the privatization of national water infrastructure in England and
Wales, as well as his own contributions to policy changes here in the United States,
which became a cornerstone of Dept. of Interior policy following Reagan's election
as President.
For a moment, I want to diverge into the sociopolitical ideas inherent to
dependency theory as developed from Raul Prebisch and Hans Singer (Prebisch
1949). Dependency Theory states that the benefits enjoyed in a capitalist economy
of core and developed countries are built on a foundation of abundance of basic
commodities in underdeveloped or periphery countries that also participate in the
capitalist economics. The product or commodity is a factor of production that
enables profitable enterprises due to its abundant presence in periphery countries
and has greater scarcity and greater value in core countries. In the matrix of a
global water market, the geography of abundance and scarcity don’t strictly rely on
14 of 28
14
a physical core and physical periphery to set the conditions of potential profit. The
hydrologic cycle doesn’t respect the political, economic, cultural and otherwise
constructed boundaries of human geography. The hydrological cycle is firmly
based on physical geography. It can however be affected by human geography as
the conditions of pollution addressed above have illustrated. Given the finite
availability of a continually renewing resource, the conditions of water scarcity are
in fact imposed on the resource by human action. Previously the observed water
scarcities were seen as isolated conditions of isolated human effects. In the
aggregate lens of the world system, the water crises can be seen as an eventual
target for additional profit models. Using a Foucauldian discourse analysis one can
identify the themes that produce and circulate ideas and knowledge of the water
crises. What are the limits or rules that govern an approach to a crisis or permit one
solution over another?
Overall, there is less of a water crisis and more of varied water crises. While
some of the cases are about the balance between water use versus the rate of
renewal to the local reservoirs or lakes, others are about whether the aging water
infrastructure is affordable to the community, and others still briefly reframe the
conversation about the industrial use of water, which is rarely addressed. This is
significant because if you raise the water utility bill that households must pay then
individual households will make a limited attempt to curtail water use. The limited
change in behavior is not a function of resistance but a function of the limited
options that households have to affect water consumption. Individuals can’t stop
15 of 28
15
drinking water and showering. They can be forced to not water their lawn nor
wash their cars but that is the extent of the household’s control over water
consumption. The huge use of water is not in our individual use. It is in the
industrialization of our food chain, as well as manufacturing and other private
uses of water in the marketplace. Those consumers of water are protected by a
ubiquitous laissez-faire view of business ownership. We have a marketplace that
doesn’t permit non-owners to dictate to owners how they use their factors of
production. People don’t flush enough to make up for industrial and macro-market
uses of water.
The research is comprised of various examples and case studies that make
the case that water is in crisis. It is polluted, overused, privatized, commercialized
and politicized. Most of the literature addresses the importance of defining or
proving that water as we know it is in jeopardy. There are issues of over
consumption, insufficient renewal, poor stewardship and pollution prevention as
well as scarcity. Some of the literature says that government must provide ideal
conditions for commercial development of water delivery infrastructure. Most of
the literature accepts that there is a crisis. But in light of water’s universal value to
everyone and the well documented conditions of consumption, pollution and
developing scarcity, why is there still a crisis? The FAO and the MNIO projects
have theorized certain conditions or attributes of access to water as a means of
showing that a population is vulnerable or at risk for development failure. (Food
and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. 2013); (Statistics Division, Department of
16 of 28
16
Economic and Social Affairs, U.N. 2012). Should not knowledge of the
aforementioned conditions of crises sufficiently inform the public to solicit their
representative authorities for changes that address the underlying crises?
In fact, in the U.S., public resistance to preceding actions that can enable
improvements are consistently predictable because most people see the water and
then they see their water utility bill but never make the connection to the
supporting infrastructure and service. Most strongly resist paying a bill that
reflects the work that goes into providing the cleanest water in the world, right to
their tap. In the U.S., that represents such a well-orchestrated convenience wherein
the water is synonymous with the means of delivery; it’s free or at least priced as
artificially low as possible. We feel so strongly that water is fundamental and yet
we create conditions where longer-lived corporations can isolate the water for their
own use and profit. Nestle can bus out truckloads of water from a community and
repackage it to cost more than oil. (Soechtig 2010).
First I showed the lens of people’s view of water and its universal value.
Next I illustrated the lenses of crises such as scarcity, pollution, consumption, and
access. Then I related the lens of privatization, presented as the means of
controlling or curtailing consumption by market forces and market scarcity, as the
proposed solution to these crises. Next I will critique some of the approaches and
discourses that surround the water crisis. I will do this within a theme of
rethinking commodification as a distinct quality of the neo-liberalization of nature
as well as the geographical contradictions resulting from commoditizing water.
17 of 28
17
I will start with criticism of the technological approaches that purport to
address scarcity. Desalination, reverse osmosis plants, water exports and water
condoms are technologically owned processes. They are an infrastructure that
requires factors of production. It is proffered as a solution to pollution conditions.
While solutions that address pollution co-opt the language of environmentalism (of
which pollution is a primary target) they obfuscate the question of preventing
pollution as a solution. The UN Water Convention focus areas do not directly
address standards or goals to ameliorate pollution thereby avoiding a discussion of
the conditions from which water scarcity propagates. (United Nations 2013).
Pollution creates scarcity to which technological solutions are the proposed
answer. Pollution is a threat to water and to people while it is simultaneously and
indirectly a sub factor of production, in the privatization model. In a similar vein,
Virtual Water Trading borrows from the language of the market place and logistics.
It isn’t really a solution because it merely attempts to reinforce the existing global
exchanges of agricultural goods by injecting additional value into the existing
product and the global exchange of that product which may carry its own
discordant core versus periphery flow. It further attempts to add credibility to
other wise irreconcilable abstractions of free trade versus actual trade policies like
core countries agribusiness subsidies. These approaches don’t address issues of
pollution because the discourses of neo-liberal economic policy are meant to
reinforce economic ideas, not engage in self-criticism.
18 of 28
18
We’ve allowed other ideas that are normally encapsulated in our markets
and commodities to infiltrate our ideas of water. A critical review of the following
quote sees such an example.
“Guiding Principles Concerted action is needed to reverse the present trends of
overconsumption, pollution, and rising threats from drought and floods. The Conference Report sets out recommendations for action at local, national and international levels, based on four guiding principles.” (United Nations 1992, 1)
… “Principle No. 4: Water has an economic value in all its competing uses and should be
recognized as an economic good Within this principle, it is vital to recognize first the basic right of all human
beings to have access to clean water and sanitation at an affordable price. Past failure to recognize the economic value of water has led to wasteful and environmentally damaging uses of the resource. Managing water as an economic good is an important way of achieving efficient and equitable use, and of encouraging conservation and protection of water resources." (United Nations 1992, 2)
This is the first instance that water has been categorized as a product in the
international discourse (McDowel, et al. 2009). The statement constructs the idea
that the crises of water (listed here as “overconsumption, pollution”, and increased
“drought and floods”) can be reversed through action. That action is defined as
“local, national and international”. Further, one of the principles that should guide
the different scales of action (by localities, countries, and the world) is to see water
as being an economic good. It further asserts that crises of water are the result of
not classifying water as an economic product with market value. Having economic
value will encourage users of water to not pollute nor overuse.
19 of 28
19
The discourse is formed by framing water as in crisis and that solving these
crises means taking action. Action is defined as being local (where all individual
people can associate themselves as local), national (where all people live under a
government to which they have already entrusted their well-being in some form),
and international (where all people must trust the unseen negotiations undertaken
by their own entrusted national governments as being in their own interests). I
assess that the Virtual Water Trade mentioned earlier has formed from the
discourse of water as commodity, injecting it into the existing market of
industrialized agriculture.
Another example to analyze is the report on the energy costs of water
delivery in California. The report is an example of the economic language used in
discourses about water and its unwitting participants/propagators like the Natural
Resources Defense Council. The report relates that most California residents don't
realize how closely related water delivery is to power use. Treating, heating,
cooling and delivering water to the rest of the state desert costs a great deal of
electricity. The California State Water Project uses up to 3% of all the electricity
used in the state just to deliver water to San Francisco Bay-Delta and Southern
California. Transporting water over the Tehachapi Mountains is the highest lift of
any water system in the world and costs the equivalent of 1/3rd the total average
household electricity use in the region. Pumping groundwater for irrigation on
farms uses 90% of total electricity in the region. State and municipal planners don't
consider these energy costs. This represents wasteful resource management which
20 of 28
20
creates higher than necessary costs for the citizens to whom the water is delivered.
Knowing the logistics of water delivery can save both money and water.
Considering and incorporating the energy used into water planning can reduce
total costs and lessen water waste. (Cohen, Nelson and Wolff 2004). While the
feasibility of large urban and industrial infrastructures continually being
developed in arid regions is a worthy target for analysis, the report doesn’t address
that theme of criticism. It instead attempts to use the language of logistics
management and business models in order to qualify the discourse of conservation
of water resources. Saving water for everyone because everyone needs it is not seen
as a credible argument for water conservation in its own right, in this instance. It
has to be couched in rhetoric of business planning and reducing business costs.
An example of a participant and constructor of the discourse is the
corporation Nestlé Waters. Listed on their website are classifications of water that
serve to position their water commodity in language that sets it apart from
municipal water. Natural mineral water is defined but also described using leading
descriptors of "pure" and "untouched". The majority of European sales are of
natural mineral water. Spring Water is defined as origin water where the source of
the water is part of the descriptor. It is the majority of the brands sold in the U.S.
Prepared Water is described as any water that has been processed to include
municipal water (tap water) where processing serves to qualify the product as safe
to drink. This is the standard for emerging countries (developing, periphery)
whose markets equate purity with safe to drink. (Nestlé Waters 2013). Nestlé
21 of 28
21
Waters also engage with the discourse on the environmental front as well. The
rhetoric used borrows from environmentalism as they describe their involvement
with water resource protection. Nestlé Waters extolls the virtue of their
involvement in protecting water resources. An example in Vittel, France is given in
which the success of the Agrivair program has protected three of Nestlé Waters
springs. (Nestlé Waters 2013). The language used suggests that local people’s water
is protected but only within a context of transnational corporate ownership of a
local resource as a precondition of successful protection in the form of water
resource management. These statements might not be impactful in isolation but in
the larger discourse they occur in concert with other corporations using other
methods to favorably position themselves to take advantage of water scarcities.
One such example is Maplecroft. Their business is issue and risk analysis
and their customers have a vested interest in preserving existing processes and
initiatives for profit. That means they identify key emerging economies and oil rich
nations in order to export water issues to ensure food security through an updated
“land grab” model. They have evaluated certain Middle East countries at extreme
risk such as Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. (Maplecroft 2013). Using a
basic understanding of precipitation levels measured against aquifer renewal (or
even consumption) can easily show a delicate hydrological balance in arid regions.
Maplecroft dazzles with numbers what is already well understood. Desserts are
dry and don’t get much rain so water must be carefully managed.
22 of 28
22
Referring to statements from Ric Davidge as the one listed earlier “"Right
now, there are no economic incentives to conserve", Davidge said. "The more you
use, the more you should pay. Water is essential for economic life and freedom."
(Rossi 2003). In a discourse context, Davidge’s statements suggest that conserving
water requires a marketplace of scarcity and managed demand. Greater use should
mean paying more. Freedom, and our ability to conduct ourselves in the economy,
requires water. He has associated water with freedom which can be difficult to
disagree with or see past as many people could agree that our freedom should be
associated with water. But, he also associates our economic options with freedom.
That association is provided by the larger discourse of freedom which is pervasive
in our culture. That construct is the means by which solutions to water can be
framed or formed to eliminate local access or availability.
Another example of Davidge efforts at constructing discourse can be seen
from this quote in response to the question of whether water should be defined as a
human right. "Water has its own value, just like other commodities," Davidge
answered. “The problem is, if water is a human right, then it doesn't have value,
and it gets wasted." (Rossi 2003). Ric Davidge frames the issue of resistance to
water privatization by critiquing whether people have a right to water. He
considers rights as unvalued abstractions. Solving the water crisis requires
commoditizing it because a commodity has value. He carefully performs a bait and
switch with the public need for a solution and the private need for a profitable
scarcity.
23 of 28
23
Conclusion Section
The purpose of the paper has not been to solve the water crisis. The goal has
been to challenge the assertion that the current discourse of crisis and solution are
the only alternatives to consider; I’m challenging whether the crisis is accurately
depicted and whether the solutions are answering the crisis.
As I have considered the literature that describes water crises, and the
proffered solutions, I believe the gap I have attempted to identify has not been a
gap of research. It is a gap made vacant by our Lockeian defined inalienable human
rights. Water has moved into crisis because we have allowed our values
surrounding commodity exchange to infiltrate our biological need for water.
“The things which have the greatest value in use have frequently little or no value in exchange; and, on the contrary, those which have the greatest value in exchange have frequently little or no value in use. Nothing is more useful than water; but it will purchase scarce any thing; scarce any thing can be had in exchange for it. A diamond, on the contrary, has scarce any value in use; but a very great quantity of other goods may frequently be had in exchange for it.” (Smith 1776)
We don’t really value water because we have adopted into our culture the
values of commodification as expressed in our inalienable right to life liberty and
property or the more abstract and popular "pursuit of happiness". We have
positioned property as the embodiment of our identity, philosophy and purpose. It
is property that we now struggle to acquire, whereas it was water that we here to
fore struggled to access.
Western thought can exhibit an undercurrent or theme has continually
attributed human inevitability regarding the mastery of the environment, or
24 of 28
24
surrounding landscapes and ecology that people inhabit. Gravitating toward
private solutions may not simply be an expression of the current neo-liberal
primacy and self-propagating discourse of profit driven solutions but may in fact
be a cultural quality endemic to the currently unfettered capitalist thought. In any
case, whenever solutions are proposed, they are often proposed from within a
discourse that includes the rhetoric of economic costs, economic strengths,
economic values, and conditions of the market. Solutions that attempt to address
water crises by using market forces are in denial of the goals of market actors. As
longs as profit is the virtue, then the vices of corporate pathology will remain
invisible.
25 of 28
25
An Exploration of Flood Myths. 2004. All Things Considered.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4253797. Associated press. 1916. Dry Barcelona forced to ship in water - Weather | NBC
News. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24629154/#.UWL3zqMnh8F (last accessed 8 April 2013).
Bakker, K. 2005. Neoliberalizing Nature? Market Environmentalism in Water Supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (3):542–565.
Bakker, K. J. 2001. Paying for Water: Water Pricing and Equity in England and Wales. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26 (2):143–164.
———. 2010. Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World’s Urban Water Crisis First ed. Cornell University Press.
Barlow, M. Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Coming Battle for the Right to Water. New Press.
Barnett, C. 2012. Blue Revolution: Unmaking America’s Water Crisis. Beacon Press. Bozzo, S. 2009. Blue Gold: World Water Wars. Carpenter, S., N. F. Caraco, D. L. Correll, R. D. Howarth, A. N. Sharpley, and V. H.
Smith. 1998. Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen. Issues in Ecology 8 (3):559–563.
Choudhury, M. A. 2004. Oil and Water Do Mix: The Case of Saudi Arabia. The Journal of Developing Areas 37 (2):169–179.
Clarke, T., and M. Barlow. 2003. Blue Gold: The Fight to Stop the Corporate Theft of the World’s Water. New Press.
Eliade, M. 1979. The Sacredness of Nature and Cosmic Religion. In The Sacred and the Profane, 116–161. New York, New York, U.S.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Elisabeth, K. 2013. Water For One People Only: Discriminatory Access and “Water-Apartheid” in the OPT. http://www.alhaq.org/publications/publications-index/item/water-for-one-people-only-discriminatory-access-and-water-apartheid-in-the-opt (last accessed 19 April 2013).
Epic of Gilgamesh. 1920. Fagan, B. 2011. Elixir: A History of Water and Humankind. New York: Bloomsbury
Press. Fishman, C. 2011. The Big Thirst: The Secret Life and Turbulent Future of Water 1st
ed. Free Press. http://www.thebigthirst.com/. Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. FAO Aquastat Database. Rome,
italy. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/ (last accessed 15 February 2013). Gallagher, J. 2013. The Global Economics of Water. http://dahlgren.umw.edu/
(last accessed 26 February 2013). Giordano, M., M. Giordano,, and A. Wolf. 2002. The Geography of Water Conflict
and Cooperation: Internal Pressures and International Manifestations. The Geographical Journal 168 (4):293–312.
26 of 28
26
Gleick, P. H. 1993. Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodman, A. 1918. Spain suffers worst drought - CNN.com. CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/04/18/spain.drought/index.html (last accessed 8 March 2013).
Irena Salina, and Vandana Shiva. 2008. Flow How did a handful of corporations steal our water. www.flowthefilm.com/.
Jackson, R. B., S. R. Carpenter, C. N. Dahm, D. M. McKnight, R. J. Naiman, S. L. Postel, and S. W. Running. 2001. Water in a Changing World. Ecological Applications 11 (4):1027–1045.
John the Baptist. 1546. Gospel of John. In New Testament. Trent, Italy: Roman Catholic Church.
Keeley, G. 2013. Barcelona forced to import emergency water | World news | The Guardian. The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/14/spain.water (last accessed 8 April 2013).
Kris Christen. 2000. Global Freshwater Scarcity: Is Privatization a Solution? Environmental Science & Technology 34 (15):340–345.
Linden, G., B. Smith, and J. York. 2003. Amazon.com Recommendations: Item-to-Item Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Computer Society :76–80.
Lustgarten, A. 2012. Injection Wells: The Poison Beneath Us. ProPublica. http://www.propublica.org/article/injection-wells-the-poison-beneath-us (last accessed 15 April 2013).
———. 2003. Poisoning the Well: How the Feds Let Industry Pollute the Nation’s Underground Water Supply - ProPublica. Propublica. http://www.propublica.org/article/poisoning-the-well-how-the-feds-let-industry-pollute-the-nations-undergroun (last accessed 15 April 2013).
Maplecroft. 1926. Maplecroft index identifies Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia as world’s most water stressed countries. Maplecroft. http://maplecroft.com/about/news/water_stress_index.html (last accessed 26 March 2013).
Maplecroft | Home | About Maplecroft | Media room | Maplecroft news | Maplecroft index identifies Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia as world’s most water stressed countries. 1926. Maplecroft. http://maplecroft.com/about/news/water_stress_index.html (last accessed 26 March 2013).
Nace, R. L. 67-. Are we running out of water? Washington: U.S. Geological Survey, DOI. http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1967/0536/report.pdf.
Nestlé Waters. Our 3 categories of water. http://www.nestle-waters.com/brands/types-of-water#.UVHowaNSma4 (last accessed 26 March 2013a).
27 of 28
27
———. 19:07:40. Water resource protection : involving local communities. http://www.nestle-waters.com/water/communities#.UVHxqqNSma4 (last accessed 26 March 2013).
———. Water resource protection : involving local communities. http://www.nestle-waters.com/water/communities#.UVHxqqNSma4 (last accessed 26 March 2013b).
Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds. 2013. National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2008-2009. Washington D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Østigård, T. A History of the Ideas of Water: Deconstructing Nature and Constructing Society. In The Ideas of Water from Antiquity to Modern Time, 2., 1–36. http://oestigaard.com/books/.
Page, B. 2005. Paying for Water and the Geography of Commodities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (3):293–306.
Parfit, M. 2003. Quotation. In Blue Gold, by Barlowe, Maude and Clarke, Tony, 296. New Press.
Prebisch, R. 1949. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. Havana.
Racek, S. 2010. Money: Exemptions from Legislation and Access to Legislators. Rogers, P., and S. Leal. 2010. Running out of Water: The Looming Crisis and
Solutions to Conserve Our Most Precious Resource. Palgrave Macmillan. Ronnie Cohen, Barry Nelson, Gary Wolff, and Emily Cousins. 2004. NRDC: Energy
Down the Drain - Executive Summary. Natural Resources Defense Council. http://www.nrdc.org/water/conservation/edrain/execsum.asp (last accessed 11 April 2013).
Rossi, J. 2003. Is the water bag proposal a Trojan horse? North Coast Journal. http://www.northcoastjournal.com/020603/cover0206.html (last accessed 18 March 2013).
Shiva, V. 2002. Water Wars: Privatization, Pollution and Profit. South End Press. Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and the Causes Of The Wealth Of
Nations. Adam Smith. Snitow, A., D. Kaufman, and M. Fox. 2007. Thirst: Fighting the Corporate Theft of
Our Water 1st ed. Jossey-Bass. Soechtig, S. 2010. Tapped. Disinformation. Statistics Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, U.N. 2012.
Millennium Development Goals Indicators. Stephens, L. M. A. 2012. Quiz on the Water Cycle. Texas Railroad Commission, Oil and Gas Division. 2003. Permit to Dispose of Non-
Hazardous Oil and Gas Waste by Injection into Porous Formation not Productive of Oil and Gas. http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/371128-well-cae-file-1-341-001-000111-38.
28 of 28
28
United Nations. 1992. The Dublin Statement on Water and Sustainable Development - UN Documents: Gathering a body of global agreements. 5. Dublin: United Nations http://www.un-documents.net/h2o-dub.htm (last accessed 1 March 2013).
———. 2013. Water Convention | Water Cooperation: Making it Happen! International Annual UN-Water Zaragoza Conference 2012/2013. Preparing for the 2013 International Year. United Nations. http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/water_cooperation_2013/water_convention.shtml (last accessed 29 April 2013).
United States Reports. 1892. Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois. Waitt, G. 2010. Doing foucauldian discourse analysis-revealing social realities. In
Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, ed. I. Hay, 217–240. Don Mills, Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
Water, Religions and Beliefs. 2005. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://www.unesco.org/water/news/newsletter/122.shtml (last accessed 2 March 2013).
WaterBank. News Letter V1 #12 Bulk Water. Water Exports. http://www.waterbank.com/Newsletters/nws12.html (last accessed 2 March 2013).
Waterwise. 2013. Waterwise. Waterwise. http://www.waterwise.org.uk/pages/about-us.html (last accessed 1 February 2013).
Wolf, A. 1999. Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict. Natural Resources Forum 23 (1):3–30.
World Water Assessment Programme. Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk. Paris: UNESCO. http://www.unwater.org/documents.html.