Post on 07-Feb-2023
Studies on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy
INTERNATIONAL MAX PLANCK RESEARCH SCHOOLon the Social and Political Constitution of the EconomyKöln, Germany
Annette Michaela Hübschle
A Game of Horns
Transnational Flows of Rhino Horn
Studies on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy
Studies on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy
are published online on http://imprs.mpifg.de. Go to Dissertation Series.
Published by IMPRS-SPCE
International Max Planck Research School on the Social and
Political Constitution of the Economy, Cologne
http://imprs.mpifg.de
© Annette Michaela Hübschle, 2016
Annette Michaela Hübschle
A Game of Horns
Transnational Flows of Rhino Horn
ISBN: I978-3-946416-12-8
DOI: 10.17617/2.2218357
Studies on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy
Abstract
A multi-sectorial regime of protection including international treaties, conservation and
security measures, demand reduction campaigns and quasi-military interventions has been
established to protect rhinos. Despite these efforts, the poaching of rhinos and trafficking
of rhino horn continue unabated. This dissertation asks why the illegal market in rhinoceros
horn is so resilient in spite of the myriad measures employed to disrupt it. A theoretical
approach grounded in the sociology of markets is applied to explain the structure and
functioning of the illegal market. The project follows flows of rhino horn from the source
in southern Africa to illegal markets in Southeast Asia. The multi-sited ethnography included
participant observations, interviews and focus groups with 416 informants during fourteen
months of fieldwork. The sample comprised of, amongst others, convicted and active rhino
poachers, smugglers and kingpins, private rhino breeders and hunting outfitters, African
and Asian law enforcement officials, as well as affected local communities and Asian
consumers. Court files, CITES trade data, archival materials, newspaper reports and social
media posts were also analysed to supplement findings and to verify and triangulate data
from interviews, focus groups and observations.
Central to the analysis is the concept of “contested illegality”, a legitimization mechanism
employed by market participants along the different segments of the horn supply chain.
These actors’ implicit or explicit contestation of the state-sponsored label of illegality serves
as a legitimising and enabling mechanism, facilitating participation in gray or illegal markets
for rhino horn. The research identified fluid interfaces between legal, illegal and gray markets,
with recurring actors who have access to transnational trade structures, and who also
possess market and product knowledge, as well as information about the regulatory regime
and its loopholes. It is against the background of colonial, apartheid and neoliberal
exploitation and marginalization of local communities that a second argument is introduced:
the path dependency of conservation paradigms. Underpinning rhino conservation and
regulation are archaic and elitist conservation regimes that discount the potential for
harmonious relationships between local communities and wildlife. The increasing
militarization of anti-poaching measures and green land grabs are exacerbating the rhino
problem by alienating communities further from conservation areas and wild animals. The
third argument looks at how actors deal with coordination problems in transnational illegal
markets. Resolving the coordination problems of cooperation, value and competition are
considered essential to the operation of formal markets. It is argued that the problem of
security provides an additional and crucial obstacle to actors transacting in markets. The
systematic analysis of flows between the researched sites of production, distribution and
consumption of rhino horn shows that the social embeddedness of actors facilitates the
flourishing of illegal markets in ways that escape an effective enforcement of CITES
regulations.
About the author
Annette Michaela Hübschle was a doctoral researcher at the IMPRS-SPCE from 2011 to
2015.
Agameofhorns:Transnationalflowsofrhinohorn
Inauguraldissertationzur
ErlangungdesDoktorgradesder
Wirtschafts-undSozialwissenschaftlichenFakultätderUniversitätzuKöln
2016
vorgelegtvon
AnnetteMichaelaHübschle
aus
Pretoria,Südafrika
3
TableofContentsTableoffigures,graphs,mapsandtables.............................................................................6
Abbreviationsandacronyms................................................................................................7
Acknowledgments..............................................................................................................11
Chapter1:Anunstoppablepathwaytoextinction?............................................................161.1Settingthescene:Wherehavealltherhinosgone?................................................................161.2Problematizingtheresilienceofillegalmarkets......................................................................23
1.2.1Rhinohorntradeasapoachingproblem...............................................................................231.2.2Rhinohorntradeasatransnationalorganizedsupplychain.................................................311.2.3Rhinohorntradeasamulti-actorbusinessenterprise..........................................................391.2.4Synthesizingtheresearchgaps..............................................................................................42
1.3Theoreticalframing................................................................................................................441.3.1Rhinohornmarketsaresociallyembedded...........................................................................451.3.2Defining‘illegalmarkets’andintroducingthenotionof‘flows’............................................471.3.3Thenotionofcontestedillegalityanditsimpactontheemergenceandfunctioningofflows........................................................................................................................................................501.3.4Resolvingcoordinationproblemsinillegalmarkets..............................................................54
1.4Structureofthedissertation..................................................................................................67
Chapter2:Researchingillegalmarkets...............................................................................702.1Introduction...........................................................................................................................702.2Researchingillegalmarkets....................................................................................................71
2.2.1Choosingthequalitativeroute...............................................................................................752.2.2Researchdesign:Amulti-sitedethnography.........................................................................772.2.3Single-casestudyandtheoreticaldevelopment....................................................................81
2.4Methods................................................................................................................................832.4.1Desktopandarchivalresearch...............................................................................................842.4.2Fieldwork................................................................................................................................88
2.5Triangulationanddataanalysis..............................................................................................972.6Grayareasofsocialresearch:Researchethics........................................................................99
2.6.1Informedconsent.................................................................................................................1022.6.2Anonymityandconfidentiality.............................................................................................1042.6.3Positionalityoftheresearcher.............................................................................................1062.6.4Reciprocity...........................................................................................................................1132.6.5Securityconcerns.................................................................................................................116
2.7Concludingremarks..............................................................................................................120
Chapter3:Ofunicornsandrhinohorns:Thedemandforrhinohorn................................1223.1Introduction.........................................................................................................................1223.2Thephysicalandchemicalpropertiesofrhinohorn..............................................................1233.3Aglobalhistoryintothemythologyoftherhino..................................................................1313.4.Huntingtalesandmyths......................................................................................................1483.5TheculturallegacyofthejambiyaanditssymbolicvalueinYemen.....................................1543.7Currentrhinohornuse,consumerprofilesandproductdifferentiation................................158
3.7.1Rhinohornasaninvestmentandmoneylaunderingtool...................................................1583.7.2Rhinohornasastatussymbol.............................................................................................1623.7.3Rhinohornasmedicine........................................................................................................165
3.8Concludingremarks:Sacredvalueandcontestedillegality...................................................169
4
Chapter4:Rhinoprotection:Parks,privatelandandconservationparadigms..................1714.1Introduction.........................................................................................................................1714.2Whyshouldrhinosbeprotected?.........................................................................................1724.3ColonialconservationmeasuresinSouthAfrica...................................................................1734.4Privaterhinos:Thecommodificationandprivatizationoftherhino.....................................180
4.4.1Privateownershiprights......................................................................................................1834.4.2Large-scaleconversiontogameranchinginthe1990s.......................................................1914.4.3Privatizationoftherhino.....................................................................................................1954.4.4Thesaleofliverhinosasafundraisingstrategyfornationalparks.....................................200
4.5Theascendancyofneoliberalconservation?........................................................................2104.5.1Casestudy:ThecreationoftheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark.....................................212
4.6Concludingremarks..............................................................................................................222
Chapter5:Theinternationalpoliticalprotectionregime:Theroadtoextinctionispavedwithgoodintentions........................................................................................................224
5.1Introduction.........................................................................................................................2245.2Theinternationalregulatorybackdrop:CITES.......................................................................2255.3Theinternationalresponse...................................................................................................240
5.3.1TheVietnameseresponse....................................................................................................2455.3.2TheSouthAfricanresponse.................................................................................................247
5.4Concludingremarks..............................................................................................................255
Chapter6:Ridingontheedgeoflegality:Interfacesbetweenlegal,grayandillegalmarkets.........................................................................................................................................257
6.1Introduction.........................................................................................................................2576.1‘Putandtake’andotherhuntingtransgressions..................................................................2586.2Permitfraud.........................................................................................................................266
6.2.1TheGroenewaldgang..........................................................................................................2676.2.2Thepseudo-huntingphenomenon......................................................................................2716.2.3Thaisexworkersastrophyhunters.....................................................................................2746.2.4TheresilienceoftheXaysavangnetwork.............................................................................2786.2.5“Round-tripping”:Rhinohornintransit...............................................................................2826.2.6Theimpactofpseudo-huntingonpricestructuresandtrustissues....................................283
6.3Cooperation:TheAfrican-Asianconnection..........................................................................2856.4Contestedillegality:Legitimizingregulatorybreaches..........................................................2876.5Conclusion...........................................................................................................................292
Chapter7:Poachingrhinos:Illegalflowsofrhinohorn.....................................................2947.1Introduction.........................................................................................................................2947.2Diffusion,expansionandadaptationofflowsfrom2008onwards.......................................2967.3Kingpins,intermediariesandsmugglers:Thelocalstronghold..............................................306
7.3.1Thesocialeconomyintheborderlands:Whatdoesittaketobecomearhinokingpin?....3077.3.2Need,greedandenvironmentaljusticeprinciples..............................................................309
7.4Feedbackloopsofrhinopoachingandanti-poachingmeasures...........................................3147.5Rolesandfunctionswithinpoachinggroups.........................................................................3227.6Cooperation,securityandcompetition:Howkingpinssecurethecontinuityoftheflow......3297.7Smugglingthehorn:Efficiencyversussecurityconcerns.......................................................3357.8Conclusion...........................................................................................................................342
Chapter8:Fakerhinohorn:Trustandtheissueofqualitycontrol....................................3438.1Introduction.........................................................................................................................3438.2LegalactorsandErsatzhorn.................................................................................................3438.3CriminalactorsandfakeorErsatzhorn................................................................................347
5
8.4Trust,qualitycontrolandtheroleofthehornassessor........................................................3498.5Rhinohornpills:Trustinfactory-producedmedicines..........................................................3568.6Fakehornproductionandqualitycontrolatthesource.......................................................3598.7Cooperationbetween‘con-men’anddealers.......................................................................3618.8Fakeantiquelibationcupsandthenotionof‘pre-Convention’rhinohorn...........................3628.9Conclusion...........................................................................................................................363
Conclusion:Howcantherhinobebetterprotected?........................................................365Whyhastherhinonotbeenbetterprotected?..........................................................................365Thesacredvalueofrhinohorn...................................................................................................365Historicallock-in........................................................................................................................366Contestedillegality....................................................................................................................367Theinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegality..............................................................................368Theresilienceofflows...............................................................................................................369Thestructureofthemarket.......................................................................................................370Theoreticalcontribution............................................................................................................370Partingwords............................................................................................................................371
AppendixA:Researchsitesandmaps...............................................................................372
AppendixB:Indemnityformforinterviewswithoffenders...............................................376
Bibliography.....................................................................................................................377
6
Tableoffigures,graphs,mapsandtablesFigure1:CTscanofawhiterhinoceros...................................................................................126Figure2:Rhinohorngrindingbowls........................................................................................127Figure3:ThegoldenrhinocerosofMapungubwe..................................................................133Figure4:AlbrechtDürer's'Rhinoceros'...................................................................................139Figure5:RhinohornlibationcuporiginatingintheQingdynasty..........................................144Figure6:Atraditionaljambiyawithhiltcarvedoutofrhinohorn..........................................156Figure7:Rhinoalcohol............................................................................................................163Figure8:TheborderfencebetweentheKrugerNationalPark,SouthAfrica&Mozambique220Figure9:Thaipseudo-hunter.................................................................................................276Figure10:RhinotrophywithErsatzhorn................................................................................344
Graph1:PricecomparisoninUS$/kgofrhinohorntoothercommodities............................19Graph2:Structureofrhinohornconduits...............................................................................32Graph3:Structureoforganizedrhinohornnetworks.............................................................34Graph4:Nationalityofhuntersapplyingforwhiterhinohuntsjuxtaposedagainstthe
averagepriceoftrophyhunting,2004-2011...................................................................272Graph5:SouthAfrica'sofficiallyreportedexportdataversusVietnam'sofficiallyreported
importdataofrhinohorn(2003-2010)...........................................................................273Graph6:Anti-poachinginterventionsintheKrugerNationalPark........................................317Graph7:Mozambicanarrest,rifleconfiscationandfinesdata,2011-2013.........................341
Map1:Globalpopulationnumbers..........................................................................................18Map2:MapofSouthAfrica....................................................................................................372Map3:MapoftheKrugerNationalPark,LimpopoNationalParkandMassingir...................373Map4:MapofSoutheastAsia................................................................................................375
Table1:SouthAfricanrhinopoachingstatistics(2000–2015)................................................21Table2:Numberofrespondentsbyfunction...........................................................................92Table3:Respondentsbyregion................................................................................................93Table4:WildlifeexportsfromtheportofDurban,1844-1904...............................................153Table5:Thechangingpoliticalecologyofwildlife..................................................................181Table6:AnnualincomeoftheSouthAfricanwildlifeindustryin2011..................................187Table7:SANParks'rhinosales,2007–2014.............................................................................202Table8:SANParks'revenuefromthetotalsaleofwildlifeversusliverhinosales(2011-2014)
.........................................................................................................................................205Table9:PriceofrhinosatVleissentraalprivateauctionsinSouthAfricain2014..................208Table10:ConditionsoftradeundertheAppendicesI,IIandIIIofCITES...............................228Table11:Whendidrhinorange,transitandconsumerstatesjoinCITES?.............................230Table12:ArrestsanddeathsofpoachersintheKrugerNationalPark,2010-2014..............316
7
AbbreviationsandacronymsABSA:AmalgamatedBanksofSouthAfrica
ACTCM:AmericanCollegeofTraditionalChineseMedicine(UnitedStatesofAmerica)
AFD:AgenceFrançaisedeDéveloppement(FrenchDevelopmentAgency)
AoIR:AssociationofInternetResearchers
ANC:AfricanNationalCongress(SouthAfrica)
APNR:AssociatedPrivateNatureReserves(SouthAfrica)
APU:Anti-poachingunit
AfRSG:AfricanRhinoSpecialistGroup
ASEAN-WEN:AssociationofSoutheastAsianNationsWildlifeEnforcementNetwork
BCE:BeforeCommonEra
CAMPFIRE:CommunalAreasManagementProgrammeforIndigenousResources(Zimbabwe)
CCAOM:CouncilofCollegesofAcupunctureandOrientalMedicine
CCR:ConsultationCommitteeonResettlement(LimpopoNationalPark)
CE:CommonEra
CEO:ChiefExecutiveOfficer
CITES:UnitedNationsConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFauna
andFlora
CBNRM:Community-BasedNaturalResourceManagement
CoE:CommitteeofExperts
CoP:ConferenceofParties(CITES)
CRAVED:concealable,removable,available,valuable,enjoyableanddisposable
CT:ComputerizedTomography
DA:DemocraticAlliance(SouthAfrica)
DCS:DepartmentofCorrectionalServices(SouthAfrica)
DDR:disarmament,demobilizationandreintegration
DEA:DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs(SouthAfrica)
DEA:DrugEnforcementAgency(UnitedStatesofAmerica)
DEAT:DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairsandTourism(SouthAfrica)
DPCI:DirectorateforPriorityCrimeInvestigation(SouthAfrica)
8
DNPWLM:DepartmentofNationalParksandWildLifeManagement(Zimbabwe)
DSC:DallasSafariClub(UnitedStates)
DUAT:Direitodeusoeapproveitamentodaterra(Mozambique)
EFF:EconomicFreedomFighters(EEF)
EIA:EnvironmentalInvestigationAgency(conservationNGO)
ESPU:EndangeredSpeciesProtectionUnit(SouthAfrica)
EU:EuropeanUnion
FRELIMO:FrentedeLibertaçãodeMoçambique(Mozambique)
GEAR:Growth,EmploymentandRedistribution(SouthAfrica)
GEF:GlobalEnvironmentalFacility(UnitedNations)
GIS:GeographicInformationSystems
GLTP:GreaterLimpopoTransfrontierPark
ICCWC:InternationalConsortiumonCombatingWildlifeCrime
IFAW:InternationalFundforAnimalWelfare(conservationNGO)
IGO:IntergovernmentalOrganization
ISS:InstituteforSecurityStudies(SouthAfrica)
ITC:informationtechnologycommunication
IUCN:InternationalUnionforConservationofNature
KfW:KreditanstaltfürWiederaufbau(GermanDevelopmentBank)
KNP:KrugerNationalPark(SouthAfrica)
KZN:KwaZulu-Natal(provinceofSouthAfrica)
LATF:LusakaAgreementTaskForce(southernAfrica)
LEDET:LimpopoDepartmentofEconomicDevelopment,EnvironmentandTourism(South
Africa)
LMMC:GroupofLike-MindedMegadiverseCountries
LNP:LimpopoNationalPark
MK:UmkhontoweSizwe(armedwingoftheANC)
MOU:MemorandumofUnderstanding
MPIfG:MaxPlanckInstitutefortheStudyofSocieties
NEMBA:NationalEnvironmentalManagementBiodiversityAct
NEPAD:NewPartnershipforAfrica'sDevelopment
NSA:NationalSecurityAgency(UnitedStatesofAmerica)
9
NGO:Non-GovernmentalOrganizations
NPA:NationalProsecutionAuthority(SouthAfrica)
NWCRU:NationalWildlifeCrimeReactionUnit(SouthAfrica)
PGR:privategamereserve
PH:professionalhunter
PIU:ProjectImplementationUnit(LimpopoNationalPark)
PNL:ParqueNacionaldoLimpopo(LimpopoNationalParkinMozambique)
POCA:PreventionofOrganizedCrimeAct(SouthAfrica)
PPF:PeaceParksFoundation(SouthAfrica)
R:SouthAfricanRand(localcurrency)alsoshortenedtoZAR
RENAMO:ResistênciaNacionalMoçambicana(MozambicanNationalResistance)
RIM:RhinoIssueManager(SouthAfrica)
SADC:SouthernAfricanDevelopmentCommunity
SADCRMG:SouthernAfricanDevelopmentCommunityRhinoManagementGroup
SADF:SouthAfricanDefenceForce(defenceforceduringtheapartheidregime)
SANDF:SouthAfricaNationalDefenceForce(defenceforceinpost–apartheidSouthAfrica)
SANParks:SouthAfricanNationalParks(SouthAfrica)
SAPS:SouthAfricanPoliceService(SouthAfrica)
SARPCCO:SouthernAfricanRegionalPoliceChiefsCooperatingOrganization
SCP:situationalcrimeprevention
SRT:SavetheRhinoTrust(Namibia)
SWAPO:SouthWestAfricanPeoplesLiberationArmy(Namibia)
TCM:TraditionalChineseMedicine
TFCA:TransfrontierConservationArea
TOPS:ThreatenedorProtectedSpeciesregulations(SouthAfrica)
TRAFFIC:TradeRecordsAnalysisofFloraandFaunainCommerce
TVM:TraditionalVietnameseMedicine
UAV:unmannedaerialvehicles(drones)
UAS:unmannedaerialsystems
UNEP:UnitedNationsEnvironmentProgramme
UNITA:UniãoNacionalparaaIndependênciaTotaldeAngola
UNODC:UnitedNationsOfficeOnDrugsandCrime
10
US:UnitedStatesofAmerica
USAID:UnitedStatesAgencyforInternationalDevelopment(US)
VAT:ValueAddedTax
WAZA:WorldAssociationofZoosandAquaria
WTO:WorldTradeOrganization
WWF:WorldWideFundforNature
11
AcknowledgmentsFirstandforemostIwouldliketopayrespecttoallmyresearchinformantswhoagreedto
participateininterviews,focusgroupsandsubsequentfollow-upvisits,chatsorphone
conversations.Yourprecioustimeanddedicationmadethisresearchpossible.Therewere
otherswhohelpedwithintroductions,backgroundinformationandresearchmaterials.Each
oneofyouassistedinshapingthisdissertation.Ithankyouforyourinvaluablecontributions.
Thisresearchprojectwouldnothavebeenpossiblewithoutthegenerousfinancial,
administrativeandintellectualsupportandassistanceofthestaffattheMaxPlanckInstitute
fortheStudyofSocieties.TheFederalGovernmentofGermanythroughitsgenerousfunding
totheMaxPlanckInstitutefortheStudyofSocieties(MPIfG)fundedtheresearch,which
allowedmetofollowrhinohornfromthebushinsouthernAfricatomarketsinSoutheast
Asia.IamparticularlygratefultomysupervisorJensBeckert,whoencouragedandsupported
myuniqueresearchprojectandreturntoacademia.Hisadviceontheoreticalconstructs,
conceptsandmethodshelpedstructurethefinalproduct.MyotheradviserSigridQuackgave
thought-provokingguidanceontheinitialresearchproposalandanearlierversionofthe
dissertation.MycolleaguesandfriendsintheIllegalMarketsresearchgroup,RenateMayntz,
MatíasDewey,NinaEngwicht,ArjanReurinkandFrankWehingerprovidedmuchfood(and
somewine)forthought.TheMPIfGisnotdissimilartothechurch:Manyfascinatingscholars,
researchersandjournalistspassthroughitsdoors.Manyintellectualdiscussionswerehad,
andheapsoffuntoo.AspecialthankstoCarolineLang,AnaCarolaAlfinitoVieira,Lothar
Krempel,IpekGoecmen,AzerKilic,PhilipMader,MarkLutter,ArneDressler,AldoMadriago,
MarcinSarafin,BetsyCarter,AdelDaoud,SolomonZori,AndreNahoumVereta,Maria
Markantonatou,JiskaGojowczyk,KimeyPflücke,MayZuleikaSalao,NicoleRuchlak,Sebastian
Kohl,BabaraFulda,IngaRademacher,AnninaHeringandKarlijnRoex,allofwhommademy
timeinColognememorable.
Theadministrativesupportwasoutstandingandamazinglyaccommodatingwhenitcameto
theintricaciesofundertakingfieldworkinfarawayplaces,whereWesternaccountingnorms
arenotalwaysfollowedandspurofthemomentdecisionshadtobetaken.Thanksverymuch
12
toJürgenLautwein,theadministrativedirector;UrsulaTrappe,theIMPRSresearch
coordinator;DirkBloemenandhisteamforprinting,bindinganddeliverysupport;SilviaOster
forherassistanceingettingtheon-lineversionpublished;andthefabulousaccountingteam:
PetraZimmermann,RenateBlödornandSwetlanaSchander.RuthHanisch,thanksverymuch
formakingsurethatIexperiencedasoftlandinguponarrivalinKöln.GabiBreuniglightened
updarkwinterdayswithhertalesofthecountryofmychildhood,beautifulNamibia.Bruno
EggerandhisITteamwereveryhelpfulinnavigatingaMacdisciplethroughtheworldof
Windows-baseddataprogrammes.ThanksverymuchtoMargaretheHinzmann,Daniel
NeumairandTobiasHeinrichfortheirintrepidsupport.Bruno,Iamstillinaweofyourskillsin
settingupatranscontinentalSkypeconferencewithmythreePh.D.supervisors,who
happenedtobelocatedinAustralia,NorthAmericaandEuropeatthetimeofthecrucial
dissertationcompletionmeeting.GoogleScholartellsus“standontheshouldersofgiants”.
WhilemanyofthoseareinsituattheMPIfG,SusanneHillbringandherteamrunsthemost
impressivelibraryserviceIhavecomeacross,whichconnectedmetootherpublished‘giants’.
TheMPIfGholdsanamazingcollectionofbooksandjournals,aswellasaccesstomultiple
databases.Myliteratureresearchwentfarbeyondtheusualassortmentofsociologicaland
criminologicalliteratures,rangingfromhuntingdiariesof‘greatgamehunters’toancient
booksonChineseart.Ioftenrequestedbooksthathadlonggoneoutofprintandwere
essentiallyunobtainable.ElkeBürgener,CoraMolloy,SebastianLangandthemanylibrary
internsusedtheirmagic–thanksforhelpingwiththemanyinterlibraryloans!Beyondthe
MPIfG,IwouldliketothankNdamonayaOtto(Rutz),myoldschoolfriendfromNamibia,
whomIrediscoveredinCologneaftera20-yearbreak.NdamonaandThorsten,Iameternally
gratefulforyourfriendshipandthesupportyouprovidedduringmyfinalstintinCologne–a
roomwithaviewoftheRhinewasunsurpassable.
AspecialtributegoestoCliffordShearing,myPh.D.supervisorbackhomeinCapeTown,
SouthAfrica.Thanksverymuchforyourhelp,constructivecriticismandpraise.Iamlooking
forwardtofuturejointprojectsattheEnvironmentalSecurityObservatory(ESO).Ihavelearnt
somuchfromourinteractions.ElrenavanderSpuyjoinedthedotsbetweenCliffordandmy
mutualresearchinterests.ElaineAtkins,thankyouforfacilitatingaccesstoon-linedatabases
andassistingwithotheronerousadministrativetasks.Mygratitudealsogoesouttomynew
(and‘old’)colleaguesattheCentreofCriminology,UniversityofCapeTownandtheGlobal
13
InitiativeagainstTransnationalOrganizedCrime:MarkShaw,PeterGastrow,TuesdayReitano
andJulianRademeyer.Julianhasbecomeagoodfriendwhoseinputandadvicewasmuch
appreciatedwhenitcametosteeringthroughthemuddywatersofdifferentrhinonarratives.
SeveralgovernmentdepartmentsandconservationNGOsfacilitateddatacollection.Ithank
GeneralDramatandMajor-GeneralArendseforapprovingmyresearchpermit,whichallowed
theinclusionofmembersoftheDirectorateforPriorityCrimeInvestigationsintheresearch
sample.IwouldalsoliketoexpressmygratitudetotheResearchDirectorateofthe
DepartmentofCorrectionalServicesforauthorizationtoconductinterviewswithrhino
offendersinSouthAfricancorrectionalcentres(prisons).Iamespeciallyindebtedtomy
researchguide,VuyelwaMlomo-Ndlovu,whohelpedtoarrangeandcoordinateresearch
within15correctionalcentresacrossSouthAfrica.Aspecialwordofthanksgoesouttothe
socialworkers,headsofprison,administrativestaffandwardenswhoassistedatindividual
correctionalcentres.TheSANParksScientificCommitteeandMajor-GeneralJohanJooste
(Retired)grantedpermissiontoundertakefieldworkintheKrugerNationalParkandother
nationalparks.IthankyouforallowingmetolearnandobservewhathappensatGround
Zero.DrLouiseSwemmeractedasanamazingfacilitator–thankssomuchforyourhelpand
persistence!AspecialthankyougoesouttomyresearchinformantsintheKrugerNational
Park,allofwhomtooktimefromtheirbusyschedules(protectingrhinos)tosharetheir
experienceswithme.
Iwouldalsoliketorecognize:JoShawofWWFSouthAfricawhoprovidedintroductionsto
themainplayersinthewildlifeindustry;JamesCompton,directorofTRAFFICAsiaandSean
LamtheofficemanageroftheTRAFFICofficeinHongKongforhostingmeforpartofmystay
inHongKong;AnaLeaoforco-presentingwithmeatthe‘One-healthpolicyforGreater
LimpopoTransfrontierConservationArea’workshopandDarrellAbernethyfromtheFaculty
ofVeterinarySciencesattheUniversityofPretoriaforinvitingmetotheworkshop;Rusty
HustlerforextendinganinvitationtotheNationalBiodiversityInvestigators’Forumand
ColonelJohanJoosteforprovidingmysecurityclearance;JeffreyMartinandGordonBrownof
theEastAsianPolicingStudiesForumattheUniversityofHongKongforinvitingmeto
presentmyresearchatalunchtimeseminar;TedReillyandfamilyfortheirhospitalityin
Swaziland;JohnandAlbinaHume,AntandTessBaber,aswellasSelomieMaritzforhosting
14
meontheirfarms;DamianManderforhissupport;JeremyandLizAndersonforofferingmea
bed,deliciousfoodandgreatadviceduringpit-stopsinWhiteRiver;GraemeandDanifor
takingmeundertheirwings;LaurenClifford-HolmesfortheroadtriptoMauricedale;Michael
‘tSas-Rolfes,PaulO’Sullivan,SamFerreira,MichelePickover,MichaelCadman,TheoNel,
PoobalanSavari,MarkusBürgener,JohnHanks,RichardEmslie,EliseDaffue,DeWet
Potgieter,FransvanNiekerk,KevinBewick,KobusduToit,SimonBloch,PelhamJones,Adri
KitshoffandSuneshIndhurforprovidinginvaluableintroductionsandconnections,and/or
researchmaterials;andMiraDutschke,JeffreyBarbeeandNavomiNaidoofor
accommodating,feedingandentertainingmewheneverIpassedthroughJohannesburg.
Manyothershelpedduringtheresearchproject.Forreasonsofanonymityandconfidentiality
linkedtothesensitivityoftheresearchtopic,Icannotlistyournames–youknowwhoyou
are.Withoutyou,theresearchwouldnothavebeenpossible.Aspecialthankyougoesoutto
myresearchassistantsinVietnamandMozambique,theinterpretersincorrectionalcentres
andthetranscribers.Yoursupportwasvitaltothesuccessofthisproject.
IwouldalsoliketopaymyrespecttoBrianSandberg,HoaDuongandStephenEllis,who
passedawayduringtheproject.Theyprovidedsoundadvice,guidanceandinsightsforwhichI
wishIcouldhavethankedtheminpersonbutdosonow.Myheartgoesouttotheirfamilies
andlovedones.
Thisadventurewouldnothavebeenpossiblewithoutthebuy-infrommypartnerMarkand
thesupportofournearestanddearest.TheopportunitytopursueaPh.D.inafarawayplace
arose3monthsintoourmarriageandafurtherthreemonthslaterIwasonboardanairplane
toCologne.Thefollowing42monthswerefilledwithflightstoandfro,dailychatsandphone
calls.Ithastrulybeenadifficultrelationship-strengtheningexercise.Thankssomuchforyour
support,toleranceandlove.IdedicatethisdissertationtoMark,mylatefatherOtto,my
motherMichaela,andmybrotherTim.Theytaughtmetolookatissuesfromdifferentangles,
encouragedcriticalthinking,afairempatheticandethicalengagementwithfellowhuman
beingsirrespectiveofrace,gender,sexualorientationorsocio-economicstrataandlovefor
nature.TomystepdaughterTatum:Yourgenerationwillhavetolivewiththeconsequences
ofourchoicesandthoseofourancestors.Hereistohopingthattomorrow’sworldwillbea
15
happyandhealthyplacewherehumansliveinharmonywiththeirenvironment.Maytherebe
plentyofrhinos,otheranimalsandplants,andsustainableecosystems.
16
Chapter1:Anunstoppablepathwaytoextinction?“Onlywhenthelasttreeiscut,onlywhenthelastriverispolluted,onlywhenthelastfishiscaught,willtheyrealizethatyoucan’teatmoney.” AmericanIndianproverb
1.1Settingthescene:Wherehavealltherhinosgone?
Thedaysoftherhinoceros1,thesecondlargestlivingmammalaftertheelephant,appear
numbered(Rippleetal.2015).BlackrhinopopulationsinSouthAfrica’sKrugerNationalPark
(KNP)arebelievedtobedeclining,andwhiterhinonumbersarelikelytofollowsuitifrhino
poachingtrendscontinue(Ferreiraetal.2015:16).SouthAfricahaslostmorethan5000
rhinossincepoachingsurgedin2008.SomeconservatorsgivetheAfricanrhinospecies
another6to8yearsinthewild(Interviews,2014).Thereafter,thepachydermsmightbe
relegatedtozoosandhigh-securityenclosures;andinyearstocome,possiblytotheannalsof
naturalhistorybooksandnarrativesofthose,whosharedtheplanetwiththerhinoatsome
pointinthepast.Therhino’sprehistoricancestorsandotherspeciesofcharismatic
megafaunahavegoneextinctoverthemillenniaduetoclimatechange,habitatlossand
humanintervention(Lorenzenetal.2011).Whilethesefactorscontinuetoimpacttherhino’s
chancesofsurvival,thesurprisingbountyonitskeratin-likenasalappendage–therhinohorn
–andtheassociatedillegalandgraymarketsconstitutemajorthreatstothemodernrhino’s
existence.Extraordinaryregulatory,institutionalandmilitarymeasureshavebeen
implementedtosavetherhinofromextinctionanddisrupttheillegalmarketinrhinohorn.So
far,thesemeasureshavefailedtostemthetide.Theaimofthisdissertationistoanalyse
rhinohornmarketstructuresandsituatethesewithinsocial,economicandpoliticalstructures
andthebroadersocialsystem,therebyexplainingwhymeasurestodisruptflowsofrhino
hornhaveachievedlimitedsuccess.
1Theterm“rhino”,theshortenedformofrhinoceros,willbeemployedthroughoutthedissertation.
17
Ofthefiveextantrhinospecies(seeMap1),theblackrhino(Dicerosbicornis)andthewhite
orsquare-lippedrhino(Ceratotheriumsimum)liveinSub-SaharanAfrica.Twosubspeciesof
whiterhinoarerecognized:thenorthernwhitespecies(Ceratotheriumsimumcottoni)and
thesouthernwhitespecies(Ceratotheriumsimumsimum).Thenorthernwhitesubspecies
werewipedoutthroughpoachingintheirnaturalrangeinCentralandEastAfricaby2007.
ThelastfourpotentialbreedingnorthernwhiterhinosweremovedfromazoointheCzech
RepublictoarhinosanctuaryinKenya,wherearmedguardsprotectthesurvivorsaroundthe
clock(Jones2015).2Theothersubspecies–thesouthernwhiterhinos–arecurrentlylistedas
“nearthreatened”ontheInternationalUnionforConservationofNature(IUCN)RedList
(IUCN2012a).Withapproximately5000animalsremaininginthewild,theIUCNcategorizes
theblackrhinospeciesas“criticallyendangered”(IUCN2012b).3Thegreatestnumberofblack
rhinos–approximately1850animals–liveinNamibia.Community-basedconservation
initiativesarebelievedtohaveledtopositivegrowthratesafteraperiodofseverepoaching
duringtheborderwarsofthe1970sand1980s.TheNamibianrhinopopulationsrecovered
until2014when24rhinocarcasseswerediscoveredinthenorth-westerndesertregions(New
Era2015).Inlightofafurther81illegalrhinokillingsin2015,rhinosarefacinganuncertain
futureinNamibia.
SouthAfricaishometoaboutthree-quartersofworld’sremainingrhinos(Milliken/Shaw
2012:8).Bythe1960s,anestimated650whiterhinoswereleftinAfrica.TheNatalParks
Boardrescuedthewhiterhinofromalmostcertainextinctionthroughinnovativeconservation
2Scientistswerehopingthatthemovetotherhino’snaturalhabitatwouldencouragebreeding.OneofthetworhinobullsdiedofnaturalcausesinOctober2014,pushingthesubspeciesclosertoextinction(Knightetal.2015:13).
3TheIUCNRedLististheworld'smostcomprehensiveinventoryoftheglobalconservationstatusofplantandanimalspecies.Itusesasetofcriteriatoevaluatetheextinctionriskofthousandsofspeciesandsubspecies.Thesecriteriaarerelevanttoallspeciesandallregionsoftheworld.Withitsstrongscientificbase,theIUCNRedListofThreatenedSpeciesisrecognizedasthemostauthoritativeguidetothestatusofbiologicaldiversity.WithintheRedListtheconcept“threatenedspecies”isusedasanoverarchingconcept.Thefollowingcategoriesofimperilmentarerelevant:
• “criticallyendangered”:speciesfaceanextremelyhighriskofgoingextinctinthewild• “endangered”:speciesfaceaveryhighriskofgoingextinctinthewild• “vulnerable”:speciesfaceahighriskofgoingextinctinthewild(IUCNStandardsandPetitions
Subcommittee2010)
18
measuresinthe1970s(Player2013).Oftheremaining21000rhinos4–19300aresouthern
whiterhinosandapproximately1700animalsbelongtotheblackspecies(Milliken2014:15)
–between8001to9290whiterhinossurviveintheKrugerNationalPark(KNP)(Molewa
2015),SouthAfrica’ssignaturenationalpark.Roughlyone-quarterofSouthAfrica’srhinosis
onprivatelandwhilenationalandprovincialparksauthoritieshostapproximately15700
blackandwhiterhinos(Ferreira2013a).Acriticaltippingpointinrhinopopulationswas
reachedin2014withrhinodeathsoutstrippingbirthsinthatyear.Atthecurrentrateof
attrition(threerhinosarepoachedeachday),rhinosmightbeextinctinthewildinSouth
Africaby2022(Africanrhinoexpert,personalcommunication,2015).Withtheexceptionof
Nepalwheretherhinopopulationincreasedby21percentbetween2011andMay2015
(WWF2015),theAsianrhinospeciesarenotfaringbetterthantheirAfricanrelatives.The
Indianorgreaterone-hornedrhino(Rhinocerosunicornis)–fromwhichtheNepalese
populationstems–isthemostcommonAsianspeciesatanestimated3350animals.The
Javanorlesserone-hornedrhino(Rhinocerossondaicus)andtheSumatranortwo-horned
rhino(Dicerorhinussumatrensis)bothcountlessthan100animals.
Map1:Globalpopulationnumbers
Source:SavetheRhino(2014)
4MillikencollatedrhinonumbersfromIUCN/SSCAfRSGdatathatwaslastupdatedon13October2013.In2015,conservators(personalcommunication,2015)estimatedthatthetotalnumberofrhinoshaddroppedto19700animalsofbothspecies.
19
Atthecoreoftherhinocrisisisthetenaciousdemandforrhinohorninconsumermarkets.
PowderedrhinohornhasbeenusedinTraditionalChinesemedicine(TCM)formorethanfour
millennia.Carvedintohiltsfortraditionaldaggersknownas‘jambiyas’,rhinohornwasalsoin
highdemandinYemenduringthe1970sand1980s(Varisco1989a).Smallpocketsofdemand
remainintheMiddleEasterncountry(seeformoredetailVigne/Martin2008);however
consumerscannotcompetewiththehighpricesofferedinthesoutheastandeasternAsian
markets(Vigne/Martin2013:324).5Anothercenturies-oldtraditionrelatestothetrophy
huntingofrhinos.Theresultanthuntingtrophiesareexportedtothehunter’shomecountry
wheretheyarekeptinprivatecollections,galleriesandmuseums.Whiletheseolduses
enduretolesserdegrees,rhinohornisincreasinglyemployedasaninvestmenttoolandasa
criminalcurrency.Italsoservesasastatussymbol,religiousorculturalartefactandgift
amongsttheupperstrataofAsiansocieties.Thehornofthethree-toedungulateisamongst
themostexpensivecommoditiesintheworld(seeGraph1).
Graph1:PricecomparisoninUS$/kgofrhinohorntoothercommodities
Source:DatacollectedforthisprojectinSoutheastAsiaandBloombergBusiness(2015)
5Infact,therecenteconomiccrisisinYemenhasledtosomejambiyasgettingsoldoff.VigneandMartin(2013:opcit)observedthatYemenisappearedmoreguardedandavoidedshowingofftheirdaggersinpublicforfearoftheft.Whileolddaggersremainincirculationandaremnantdemandfor‘fresh’rhinohornpersists,alternativematerialshavebeendevelopedtoreplacerhinohorn,whichresemblesrhinohornbutischeaperandnotdeadlytorhinopopulations.Gumandsomesecretingredientareusedthatprovidejambiyaswiththeauthenticlookofrhinohorn(Vigne/Martin2008).
20
Asthenumberofliverhinosgrowsless,thepriceforrhinohornappearstobesurging.
AccordingtoreportsfromnorthernVietnam(Amman2015a)consumerswerepaying
between$100to$120/gforrhinohornbanglesandprayerbeadsin2015.However,
fieldworkundertakenforthisprojectinVietnamin2013foundarangeofpricesbetween$25
000to$65000/kg.Thepricewascontingentonthetypeofhorn(AfricanversusAsian/fakeor
real),use(medicinalversusstatus)andsize/composition(wholehorn/disks/powder).Atan
averageweightof5,5kgperpairofrhinohorns(Pienaar/Hall–Martin/Hitchens1991),the
hornsofasinglefree-rangingwhiterhinoareworthclosetohalfamillionDollarson
consumermarkets.Meanwhile,theaverageweightofapairofhornsofblackrhinoinSouth
Africannationalparksandreservesis2,65kg(Pienaar/Hall–Martin/Hitchens1991:102).The
currentpoachingstatisticsprovideanapproximatesizeofillegallyhuntedrhinohornentering
illegalmarketseachyear.InlightofSouthAfricalosing1004,1215and1175rhinosto
poachingin2013,2014and2015respectively(seeTable1),aminimumof4tonsofillegally
andfreshlyharvestedrhinohornenteredillegalflowseachyear.Inaddition,rhinopoaching
hasflaredupinNamibiaandZimbabweandcontinuestotroublesafariparksinKenyaand
otherrhinorangestates,furtheraugmentingfreshhornsupplies.Gangsofthieveshavebeen
stealingrhinohornfromprivatecollections,state-ownedstockpiles,museumsandgalleries
acrosstheglobe.Anunknownamountofpreviouslyharvested,evenantiquerhinohorn,horn
artefactsandhuntingtrophiesareeitherincirculationorsafelystowedaway.Duetothehigh
valueofrhinohorn,entrepreneurshavealsodevelopedfakeor‘ersatz’horn,forwhich
consumersarewillingtopartwithsubstantialsumsofmoney.
Rhinosandtheirbodypartswereamongthefirstspeciestobeaffordedvariabledegreesof
protectionwhentheUnitedNationsConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpecies
ofWildFaunaandFlora(CITES)6enteredintoforcein1975.Inspiteofthepartialtradeban
andvariousotherconservation,protectiveandsecuritymeasures,theillegalhuntingofrhinos
continues.TheKrugerNationalPark(KNP)andseveralpublicallyandprivatelyownedgame
reserveshavebecome‘battlefields’,wherestatesecurityforces,gamerangersandprivate
6CITESprotectsabout5000speciesofanimalsand28000speciesofplantsagainstoverexploitationthroughinternationaltrade.Protectedspeciesareincludedinoneofthreelists,calledtheAppendices.EachAppendixdetailstheextentofthethreattoaspeciesandtradecontrols.SpeciesareconsideredforinclusioninordeletionfromtheAppendicesatmeetingsoftheConferenceofParties,heldapproximatelyonceeverythreeyears.
21
anti-poachingunitsfightfortherhino’ssurvivalintheSouthAfricanbush.TheSouthAfrican
NationalDefenceForce(SANDF),amultitudeofprivatesecuritycompanies,publicandprivate
intelligenceoperatives,lawenforcementagenciesandhundredsofNGOshavesteppedup
measuresto‘save’therhino.Inspiteofalltheseinterventions,financialdonationsandthe
increasingmilitarizationofresponses,morethan5000rhinoshavebeenpoachedinSouth
Africasince2008(seeTable1).
Table1:SouthAfricanrhinopoachingstatistics(2000–2015)
Year KrugerNationalPark
RestofSouthAfrica Total
2000 0 7 72001 4 2 62002 20 5 252003 14 8 222004 7 3 102005 10 3 132006 17 7 242007 10 3 132008 36 47 8372009 50 72 1222010 146 187 3332011 252 196 4482012 425 253 6682013 606 398 10042014 827 388 12152015 826 349 11758
Source:DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs(2014b)&Molewa(2016)
Itisnotonlyrhinosthatarelosingtheirlivesinwhatisdescribedasa“WaronPoachers”in
publicdiscourse:anti-poachingunitshaveshotdeaddozensofsuspectedpoachersintheKNP
since2009.9Aswillbeshowninlatersectionsofthisdissertation,theincreasingmilitarization
72008ishighlightedinredtoindicateasuddenincreaseinthefrequencyofrhinopoaching.8TheDepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs(DEA)isresponsibleforcollatingpoachingstatistics,whichwerereleasedonamonthlybasisuntil2015.Sincethebeginningof2015,thestatisticsarereleasedatirregularintervals.9Meanwhile,aKrugerParkrangerandapoliceofficerwereshotandkilledinApril2012ina“blueonblue”
22
ofanti-poachingresponsescomesatahighcostnotonlyineconomictermsbuthasalsoled
tothefurthermarginalizationandalienationofruralcommunitieslivinginthevicinityof
conservationareas.
Takenatfacevaluetheregulatory,militaryandconservationmeasures,aswellasdemand-
reductioncampaignsemployedtosafeguardtherhinosuggestthatthewildanimalshouldbe
oneofthebest-protectedandcaredforcreaturesintheworld.Whatexplainsthefailureof
regulation,andthelimitedsuccessofmilitaryandotherinterventions?Whatistheroleof
marketsforrhinohorninthis?Towhatextentcanasociologicalunderstandingoftheillegal
globaltradeinrhinohorn,andananalysisofthemechanismsofthemarkethelpus
understandwhythesemeasureshavefailedandcontinuetodoso?
Itisagainstthisbackgroundthattheleadingresearchquestionofthisdissertationfocuseson
theresilienceofillegalwildlifemarkets.Thedissertationexploreswhythemyriadmeasures
employedtodisruptthemarkethavefailedtoprotecttherhinoeffectively.Atheoretical
frameworkgroundedineconomicsociologyisappliedtoexplainthestructureandfunctioning
oftheillegalmarketinrhinohorn.Itwillbearguedthatasociologicalstudyofvaluation,
competition,cooperationandsecurityintheillegalmarketforrhinohorncanassistin
understandingthereasonswhyitissodifficulttodisrupttheflowsofrhinohorn.Centralto
theanalysisistheconceptof“contestedillegality”,alegitimizationmechanismthatactors
employtojustifyillegaleconomicactionincontraventionofthelawonthebooks.Actorsmay
alsouseittodefendtheexploitationoflegalorregulatoryloopholes.Thedissertationshows
howcontestedillegalitytiedtothevaluationoftherhinoanditshornplaysanimportantrole
intheconstitutionandresilienceoftheglobalmarketinrhinohorn.Thenotionof“contested
illegality”isfurtherunpackedandconceptualizedinthetheoreticalframework(section1.3).
Thenextsectionprovidesareviewofscholarlyresearchintotheglobaltradeinrhinohorn,
identifiesgapsintheliteratureandexpandsonthecontributionofthisdissertation.
incident.FivesoldierswerekilledinahelicoptercrashinApril2013.InMay2013,arangerwasaccidentallyshotinthestomachandseriouslywoundedbyasoldier(datasuppliedbyJulianRademeyer).Whilethedeathtolliscomparativelylow,theemotionalandpsychologicalburdenfacedbythoseformerlyemployedtoconserveallwildlifeintheParkandnowre-deployedto“fightawar”tosavethelastrhinosisimmense(InterviewswithKNPofficials,2013).
23
1.2Problematizingtheresilienceofillegalmarkets
Ofinteresttothisdissertationisthequestionwhytheillegalmarketinrhinohornhasnot
beendisruptedinspiteofregulation,lawenforcementandothermethodsofintervention
suchasdemandreductioncampaignsinconsumercountries.Differentstreamsofscholarly
literaturehaveattemptedtoanswerthisquestionthroughdistincttheoreticalorparadigmatic
lenses.Thesheerabundanceofpapersandbooksdealingwiththeplightoftherhinoseemto
suggestthatweshouldhaveaclearunderstandingofhowtheillegalmarketinrhinohornis
structured,howitworksandhowtodisruptit.Thisishowevernotthecase(Nadal2015).10
Manyscholarlyandpolicycontributionssufferfromparadigmaticconvergenceemploying
eitheranthropocentricorecocentricperspectives(Shoreman-Ouimet/Kopnina2015),aswell
asethnocentricorculturalrelativistinterpretationsofsocialfacts(Sitas2014).Scholarswho
employanthropocentricperspectivescentretheiranalysisaroundhumanbeingsandsocial
concernswhereasecocentricscholarsregardtheecosphereasfundamentaltotheplanet’s
existenceandsurvival.Centraltotheargumentofthisdissertationisanelaborationofhow
thesebiasesandinterpretationsweakennormativeclaimsaboutrhinoprotectionand
conservation.Thisdissertationhasbenefittedsignificantlyfrominsightsgatheredfromso-
calledgrayliteraturesuchaspositionpapers,blogsandtechnicalreports.Inthefollowing
subsections,Iwilldiscussaselectionofrelevantscholarlycontributionsandgapswithinthe
literature.Thenetiscastwiderthroughtheinclusionofinsightsfromotherwildlifeandillegal
markets.
1.2.1RhinohorntradeasapoachingproblemThereisanoticeablebiastowardsdescribingthesupplysideofwildlifemarketswithinthe
literature,asmanystudiesfocusalmostexclusivelyonthefirstsegmentorstageofthesupply10Roughly,theliteraturecanbedividedintoreportsaimedatinfluencingpolicywiththeimplicitorexplicitsuggestionthatregulatoryresponsescouldleadtoandisruptionofrhinohornmarkets(‘tSas-Rolfes2012;‘tSas–Rolfes2011;DiMininetal.2014;EconomistsatLarge2013;Eustace2012;Martin2012;Nadal/Aguayo2014;Taylor,Andrewetal.2014),papersthatassessorsuggestresponsestorhinopoaching(Duffy2014;Duffy/Emslie/Knight2013b;Duffy/StJohn2013;Humphreys/Smith2014;Lunstrum2014;Massé/Lunstrum2016;Mouton/deVilliers2012;Lopes2014;Koenetal.2014;Eloff2012;Eloff/Lemieux2014)andanalysesofmarketsegmentsorsupplychainsofrhinohorn(Milliken/Shaw2012;Montesh2013;Rademeyer2012;Swanepoel1998;Milliken2014;Orenstein2013;Milledge2007;IpsosMarketing2013;Ellis2013;Ayling2013).
24
chainwithlittleconsiderationofwhathappensfurtherdowntheline.Scholarsthusportray
“poachers”astheprincipalsuppliersofwildlifecontraband,11ignoringtheroleofthestate,
thewildlifeindustry,NGOsandcriminalnetworksintheoverallmarketstructure.Ananalysis
ofactorconstellationsatthesourceofrhinohornandthestructuralconditionsunderwhich
poachingtakesplacearenonethelessessentialtoanysociologicalstudy.Criminologistshave
setthetoneintheliteratureonwildlifetraffickingbydescribingthecrime,profilingwildlife
offendersandprovidinginstrumentalexplanationswhywildlifecrimeisperpetrated,suchas
motivationstopoach,andstructuralorgeographicdrivers.12
SouthAfricancriminologistGerhardSwanepoel(1998:8–9),forexample,examined45police
dockets,profilingoffendersinvolvedintheillegaltradeinrhinohorninthemid–1990s.13Back
then,closeto80%oftheoffenderswereofSouthAfricanoriginwhile2%hailedfromAsia.
Accordingtorhinocrimeinvestigatorsandprosecutors(Interviews,2013,2014and2015),
about70%ofrhinooffenderswereofMozambicandescent,andtheoverallpercentageof
Asianoffendershadalsoincreasedduringtheactiveresearchphase.GregWarchol(2004)
undertookasimilarstudyabouttenyearslater,focusingonthetransnationalillegalwildlife
tradeinSouthAfricaandNamibia.Althoughobserving“hundredsofconfiscatedivorytusks
andrhinohorns”intheESPU’swarehousesin2004,Warcholregardedthethreattorhinos
andelephantsasmarginalattheselectedresearchsites.Helinkedtheabundanceof
stockpiledrhinohornandivorytoSouthAfrica’sgeographicalposition,whichserved(andstill
does)asatranshipmentnodeforpoachedwildlifefromotherAfricancountries(Warchol
11Iwillproblematizethedistinctionbetweenpoachersandhunterslaterinthedissertation.SufficetonoteherethatthedistinctiondenotesraceandclassdifferencesinthesouthernAfricancontext.12Mainstreamcriminologistshaveshownlimitedinterestinthestudyofenvironmentalsecurityandillegalwildlifemarkets.Therehavebeeneffortstoexpandtheboundariesofthedisciplinetoincludewhathasbeentermed‘greencriminology’,‘conservationcriminology’or‘environmentalcriminology’(Wellsmith2011:126).Eachsub-disciplineappliesdifferenttheoreticalframeworks.Thegreencriminologicalapproachoffersrichanddiversestudiesdealingwithproblematichuman–environmentrelations;however,itlacks“acoresetoftheoreticalconceptsthatexplainthemeaningofgreenandgreencriminologicalorientation”(Lynch/Stretesky2011:293).Moreover,thedefinitionofgreencriminologyperseiscontestedandhasbeenassociatedwithpoliticalperspectivesanda“narrowrangeofassociatedissues”(Gibbsetal.2010:125).ScholarsatMichiganStateUniversityhavedevelopedconservationcriminology,whichoffersamultidisciplinaryandinterdisciplinaryframeworkforthestudyofenvironmentalcrimesandrisks“thatlieattheintersectionofcriminology,naturalresourcesandrisksciences”(Gibbsetal.2010:129).CentraltotheMichigandefinitionof“environmentalcrimes”arepolitical,cultural,economicandsocialinfluences.13Swanepoelobtained45docketsdatingfrom1992to1995fromthenowdefunctEndangeredSpeciesProtectionUnit(ESPU)formerlylocatedwithintheSouthAfricanPoliceService(SAPS).
25
2004:62).Poachersandtraffickerswere“individualoperators”ratherthanbelongingto
organizedcriminalgroupingswithabalonetraffickers14beingtheexception(Warchol2004:
63).Noteworthyistheobservationthat“unsophisticatedpoachers”struggledtolocate
buyersforrhinohorn:“Iftheysucceedinlocatingabuyer,theymaybeofferedaslittleasUS
$50fortherhinohorn”(Warchol2004:63).Thequestionarisinghereis:Howhaverhino
poachersaddressedtheproblemoffindingasuitabletradepartnersincethen?Whathas
changed?
In2011,WarcholcollaboratedwithSouthAfricancriminologistFriedoHerbig.Theresearchers
appliedtheroutineactivitytheorytoexplainthepoachingprobleminSouthAfrica’s
protectedconservationareas.Accordingtothistheoreticalapproach,crimeismorelikelyto
occurwhenamotivatedoffenderispresent,asuitabletargetisnearbyandtheabsenceof
“capableguardians”(Herbig/Warchol2011:5).15Theassumedrationalchoiceconsiderations
ofcriminalactors,togetherwiththecrime’ssituationalfeatures,and“thetarget’sdegreeof
attractivenessinthecontextoflevelsofguardianship”(ibid)areusedtoexplainwhypoaching
occursinsomeplacesandnotinothers.Whilethenotionofopportunitystructuresisuseful,
thestudysayslittleaboutthesocialsetting,theroleofmarketdemandandhowpoachers,
traffickers,andtraderslocateandtradewitheachother.EloffandLemieux(2014)examine
howcriminalopportunitystructuresdevelopandareexploitedbyrhinopoachersinthe
KrugerNationalPark.Conceivedasanextensionoftheroutineactivitytheory,theresearchers
proposesituationalcrimeprevention(SCP).16Thisapproachincorporatesaninterventionthat
attemptstodefuseopportunitystructuresalongthetradechainfromtheAfricanbushto
Asia.Eloff(2012)usesGeographicInformationSystems(GIS)andremotesensingtoplotrhino
poachingincidentsintheKrugerNationalParkinanotherstudy.Hedifferentiatesbetween
“organized”and“foot”poachers:
“Theorganizedpoacherwithhishelicopter,nightvisionandtechnologicallyadvanced
14WarcholfoundthatChineseorganizedcrimegroupscontrolledthetraffickinginabalone.15“Capableguardians”referstothequalityofgamerangersandsupervisors,andpresenceorlackthereofduetolabourlawsorinadequatebudgeting(Herbig/Warchol2011:13).16Situationalcrimepreventionseekstoreduceopportunitiesforparticularformsofcrime(Lemieux/Clarke2009).RonaldClarke’stheory,whichheconceptualisedin1980,hasfoundresonanceamongstcriminologistsandpractitioners.
26
riflesreceivesanestimatedR12000perkgcomparedtotheunorganized“foot”poacherwhoreceivesanestimatedR81000perhorn.17Thefinalbuyerwillpaybetween$20000to$60000perkg,dependingonwhetheritisablackorwhiterhinohorn.18The“money”circleinvolvedwithinthiscriminalactivityleadstovarioussecondarycrimes–thebribingofpubliccustomofficials,theillegalissuingofpoachingpermits,andsoon.”(Eloff2012:4)
Therationalchoiceandtheroutineactivitytheoriesstandoutfromclassicalcriminological
approaches,astheydonotfocusoncriminaloffendersandsuitablecriminaljusticeresponses
only.Thesetheoriesconsidersituationalfeaturesandthetarget,therebybypassingcritiques
ofmono-causalfallacies(Brantingham/Brantingham1993:259).Scholarsclaimtoexplainthe
complexitiesofthecrimeandtheinterconnectednessofoffenders,situationalfeatures,and
thetarget.Theapproach,nevertheless,fallsshortofexplainingthesocialembeddednessof
economicaction,non-economicreasonsforpoaching(suchasdefianceoftherulesorrule–
makers)andtheframingoftheproblem.Anadvantagetomostcriminologicalapproachesis
theaction-orpolicy-drivenagendaunderpinningtheorybuilding.Theroutineactivityand
situationalpreventionapproachesarebothtailoredtowardsofferingpolicyandcriminal
justiceinterventions.Inotherwords,theoreticalconstructsprovideadviceonhowbestto
respondtothecrimeathand.Theaction-orientatedapproachofcriminologycanalso
constituteashortcoming:lawenforcersandregulatorsaretargetedwithimmediateand
oftenshort-termpolicyinterventions,suchastheprovisionofadditionalbootsontheground,
newtechnologies,andmilitaryequipment.Withregardstoillegalwildlifemarkets,there
tendstobelimitedconsiderationoftheoverallmarketstructure,thestructuraldriversof
offendingandthequestionofdemand.Thetheoreticalandnormativeobjectivesofsuch
approachesappeartooverlapwiththepolicyandbudgetobjectivesoflawenforcement
agenciesandthemilitary-industrialcomplex,whichcallsintoquestiontheautonomyand
objectivityofsuchresearch(Abercrombie,Nicholas/Hill,Stephen/Turner,BryanS[1984]
2006:88).
17Thewebsitewww.oanda.comisusedforcurrencyconversionthroughoutthisdissertation.Oandaoffershistoricalcurrencyconversions,whichallowforatruthfulreflectionofthepriceofgoodsinthepast.Whereappropriateandknown,historicalratesofforeignexchangearereflected.Asregardsthecurrentquotation:R12000approximated€1120andR81000wasworth€7600in2012.18Thisinformationisincorrect.Accordingtodatacollectedforthisprojectandindependentlyverified,buyersandsellersdonotdifferentiatebetweenwhiteandblackhornbutbetweenAsianandAfricanhorn.TheformerishighlycovetedinTCMmarketsdueitspotencyandrarity;consumersarehencewillingtopayapremium.Africanrhinohornwastradedfor25000to45000$/kgwhileAsianhorncost45000to65000$/kginVietnaminSeptember2013.
27
Theroleofwildlifeprofessionalsinillegalsupplymarketsisomittedinmanycontributions
withafewnotableexceptions:Milledge(2007)referstotheunregisteredstockpilingofrhino
hornandthelaunderingofhornintoillegalflows.MillikenandShaw(2012)andRademeyer
(2012)describepermitfraudandorganizedpoaching.Beyondwildlifeindustryprofessionals,
therearemyriadNGOs,privatesecuritycompanies,andthemilitary-industrialcomplex,allof
whichhavebecomeinextricablylinkedtoanti-poachingmeasuresandbroaderconservation
issues.Theirroleincreatingpublicawareness(a“moralpanic”ofsorts),andtheframingof
poachingasasecurityissuehasbeenlargelyoverlookedintheliterature.Lunstrum(2014)
observesagrowingandmutually–beneficialpartnershipbetweenpublicconservationofficials
andprivatemilitarycompaniesintheKrugerNationalPark.Sherefersto“theuseofmilitary
andpara-military(military-like)actors,techniques,technologies,andpartnershipsinthe
pursuitofconservation”as“greenmilitarization”(Lunstrum2014:2),whichhas“ledtoa
conservation-relatedarmsrace”(Lunstrum2014:7).Duffy(2014:819)arguesthatparks
agenciesandconservationNGOsare“wagingawartosavebiodiversity.”Accordingto
HumphreysandSmith(2014:795)the“rhinowars”haveledtothe“rhinofication”ofSouth
Africansecurity.Theanti-poachingstrategyhasbeenfusedwith“broaderissuesofnational
security,suchastheconcernoverSouthAfrica’sbordersandtransnationalcrime”(ibid)and
thepersistentlegacyofapartheidintheformof“whiteexceptionalism”,whichprecludes
broad-basedparticipationinwildlifemanagementandconservation(Humphreys/Smith2014:
818).BüscherandRamutsindela(2016)extendthenotionof“greenmilitarization”and
“rhinofication”tothebroaderconceptof“greenviolence”,arguingthatthediscourseofwar
andviolenceunderpinsconservationinitiativesinandbeyondthephysicalboundariesof
conservationareas.Thisdissertationdealswiththeimpactoftheconservation‘armsrace’on
economicandsocialstructures.The“collateraldamage”ofthesemilitaryinterventionson
socialstructures,suchasvillagecommunitieslivinginandaroundconservationareas,remains
under-researched.Moreover,wedonotknowwhethermilitaryandnon–military
interventionsleadtothesocialreproductionofhistoricalinequalities,stigmatization,and
alienationofvillagecommunities,who,underdifferentcircumstancesandframing,mightbe
agentsofchangeanddisruptorsofillegalhornsupplies.
Whatisknownaboutpoachinginthebroaderliteratureonillegalhunting?Scholarsface
severaldilemmaswhenwritingaboutpoachersandtheactofpoaching.VonEssenetal.
28
(2014:7)commentonthedifficultyofcategorizingthemotleyassortmentofactorsinvolved
inpoachinganddefiningcriteriatouseintheprocessofcategorization.Thescholars
distinguishbetweenthreemainapproachesthathavebeenusedtodeconstructpoachingor
illegalhunting:“driversofdeviance”19,“profilingperpetrators”20and“categorizingthecrime”
(vonEssenetal.2014:1).Intheiropinion,theexistingapproachesignorethesocio-political
dimensionsofillegalhunting“thatrenderanumberofhuntingcrimesdifficulttoexplainby
useofeconomicandopportunistmodelsofbehaviour”(vonEssenetal.2014:14–15).
Insteadofstigmatizingpoachersascriminals,21theyproposeasystematicexaminationofthe
socio-politicalcontextthatmayleadtoillegalhunting(vonEssenetal.2014:14).While
19MuthandBowe(1998)provideacomprehensivetypologyofpoachingmotivations,whichincludescommercialgain,householdconsumption,recreationalsatisfactions,trophypoaching,thrillkilling,protectionofselfandproperty,poachingasrebellion,poachingasatraditionalright,disagreementswithspecificregulationsandgamesmanship.20UsinginterviewswithstateconservationofficialsinKentuckyasabasisforclassification,Eliason(2008)providesamotive-groundedtypologyof“backdoorpoacher/hunter”,“experienced/habitualpoacher”,“opportunistpoacher”,“trophypoacher”,“poacherthatmixesuphisschedule”and“thequietone”.Somescholarshavesubsumedthesecategoriesintheiranalyses(Blevins/Edwards2009;Kahler/Gore2012;Filteau2012;Pires/Clarke2012;Crow/Shelley/Stretesky2013;Groff/Axelrod2013).Othersfocusontherural–urbandivide(Brymer1991;Jacoby2003;Ingram2009),trophyorsportshuntingversussubsistencepoaching(Parker/Wolok1992),opportunisticversussophisticatedororganizedpoaching(Ayling2013;Warchol/Zupan/Clack2003;Brymer1991).Whilethesetypologiesprovideusefulanalyticaltools,theyallowlittleflexibilityasregardscategorizationofactorsinmorethanonecategory,actorsmorphingfromonecategorytothenext,ortheirrelationshipswiththestateorwildlifeprofessionals.Forexample,actorsseekingupwardsocialmobilitymaygraduatefromopportunisticpoachingtopre-meditatedorganizedpoaching.IntheAfricancontext,acontinuum(ratherthanatypology)ofsubsistence,opportunity,trophyandorganizedpoachingappearsappropriate(myidea).
21Scholarshavemadenormativedifferentiationsbetween“good”and“bad”poachers,whichtiesintothegreaterdebateonthemoralityofhuntingandgunownership.InWesternfolklore,thenotionofpoachingconjuresupimagesofRobinHoodandhisgangsneakingthroughSherwoodForest,huntingtheKing’sdeerindefianceoftheSheriffofNottingham(Muth1998:5).Inthishistoricalcontext,theactofpoachingisshroudedinmythologiesofresistanceoftheweakagainstthepowerfulortheoppressedagainsttheoppressor.Themythof“good”versus“evil”poachingpersistsinmanysocietiestothisday.“Good”poachersaresociallysanctionedoracceptedbytheircommunityandlawenforcementagents(vonEssenetal.2014;Fischeretal.2013);“badpoachers”areperceivedasmorallyrepugnantandhencelacksocialandinstitutionallegitimization.Huntersthatengageinthrill-seeking(Muth/Bowe1998;Katz1988;Forsyth/Marckese1993),trophyhuntingofprotectedspecies(Eliason2011),organizedpoachingtosupplyillegalmarkets(Cohen1997)orhuntingmorethanwhattheyneedortheuseofunethicalhuntingpractices(e.g.blindinganimalswithbrightlightsatnightorelectrofishing)lacksocialsanctioningamongstlargesectorsofsocietyandthehuntingfraternity(Bell/Hampshire/Topalidou2007).Thepoachersthemselvesmayengageinpoachingforanumberofreasons;somemightbesociallysanctioned,othersnot.Micro-leveljustificationsforpoachingrangefromtheperceivedharmlessness,throughtonecessityandreasonableactionduetounfairrulemaking.Thenormativedifferentiationbetween“good”and“bad”poachersrevealsnotonlywhatisacceptabletothepoachersthemselves,fellowcommunitymembersandlawenforcementbutalsotopoliticalandeconomicelites,whoareresponsibleforsteeringthemoralcompassinsocietyandhence,thedevelopmentandimplementationofwildliferulesandenforcement.
29
observanceofthesocio-politicalandsocio-economiccontextisindeedoverlookedinmany
contributions,somescholarsconsidersocio-politicalfactorsinfluencingcomplianceornon-
compliancewithhuntingorpoachingrules.KahlerandGore(2012)undertookastudyof
stakeholders’perceptionsandmotivationstoupholdwildlifelawsinNamibia.Anumberof
motivationsextendedbeyondwhattheytermed“cookingpotandpocketbook”explanations
forpoachingbehaviour.Somepoachersweremotivatedbyrebellionordisagreementswith
therules.Thesewerelinkedtonegativesentimentstowardstheestablishment,governance
orbenefitsdistributionsystemofcertaincommunityconservanciesinNamibia(Kahler/Gore
2012:115).22Filteau(2012)foundthattheinteractionbetweengamewardensandpoachers
wasanimportantdeterminantofvoluntarycompliancewithconservationrules.Instudying
motivationsforillegalfishinginLakeKerkiniinnorthernGreece,Bellandcolleagues(2007:
415)portraypoachingasaformofcollectiveresistanceand“violationofthecultural
aestheticsofthehuman-natureinteraction”.Poachersareseenassocialactors“withgroup
solidarityforminganimportantpartofpoachingbehaviour”.Withtheaidofacasestudyon
theillegalprotest-drivenhuntingofwolvesinNordiccountries,vonEssenandAllen(2015)
arguethatillegalhuntingshouldbeconstruedasacrimeofdissent.Insteadoffocusingon
crimeandpunishment,theysuggestthattheonusisonregulatoryagenciestobetter
communicatehuntingdirectivesandgarnerbuy-infromhunters.VonEssenetal.(2014:14)
thusrecommendanexaminationofthesetting,thelegitimacyofthelegislationand
interactionsbetweenhuntersandtherestofsociety.Theysuggestdefiancetheory23asa
theoreticalanchoringforthisapproach.Thistheoryhasbeentestedinthebroaderfieldof
criminology;howeverfewwildlifecrimestudies(Bell/Hampshire/Topalidou2007;Filteau
2012;Kahler/Gore2012)classifyillegalhuntingasanexpressionofdefianceorrebellion.24
22KahlerandGore(2015)conductedafollow-upstudyinthenorth-westernZambeziregionofNamibia.Thestudylookedathowhuman-wildlifeconflict(HWC)mightinfluencethevaluationofwildlifeandpotentiallyleadtopoachingdecisions.Thestudyrevisitedinequitablebenefitdistributionsystems,suggestingbroadercommunityengagementandnuancedopencommunicationandmessagingwithlocalcommunities.23Theoriginatorofthetheoryofdefiance,Sherman(1993:460)theorizedthatshamingoffendersandexcessivedesertsincreasedthelikelihoodofreoffendingunderconditionswhereweaksocialbondstothesanctioningsociety,andperceptionofunjustlawsexisted.24Resourcegovernanceandmanagementscholarsapplytheenvironmentaljusticeframeworktoexplainwhyactorsoperateoutsideresourcemanagementrulesandsystems.ThecaseofabalonefisheryinSouthAfrica,forexample,isusedtodemonstratehowmanagementandanti-poachingresponseshavefailedtosuppressabalonepoaching.MariaHauck(2009)arguesthatsocialjusticeprincipleswerenotconsideredwhenfisherieslawandpolicywereformulatedandadoptedaftertheendoftheapartheidregimeinSouthAfrica.Localfishersdonot
30
Onetechnicalreport(Fenio2014)inthebroadliteratureonrhinopoaching,referencesanger
andmarginalizationofcommunitieslivingadjacenttoconservationareasasdriversofrhino
poaching.Thesocio-political,economicandhistoricalcontextofvillagecommunitiesliving
adjacenttoconservationareasandtheirinteractionswiththestate,conservationauthorities
andbroadersociety,aswellasconsiderationofhowthesecontextsmighttieinto
conservationobjectivesandrhinopoaching,constitutegapsintheliterature.
Whilethisstreamofscholarlyworkprovidesimportantempiricalandtheoretical
contributionsregardingpoachingandsupply-sidedynamics,thereislimitedconsiderationof
actorsotherthanpoachers,theconsumermarketordemandforrhinohorn.Asignificant
contributionisacriticalengagementofsomescholarsregardingtheusefulnessofmilitary
interventionstodisruptpoachers(greenmilitarization,greenviolence,rhinofication).Others,
ontheothersideofthenormativespectrum,regardrhinopoachingasanactofwar(Gwin
2012)orasa“matterofnationalsecurity”(Sellar2015),linkingtheresilienceofrhino
poachingtoinsufficientlawenforcement,inadequatelegislationandunjustdeserts,lackof
politicalwillandtheneedformorebootsontheground.Somescholarsproposethe
legalizationorfreemarketregulationofthetradeinrhinohornasaviableoptiontodisrupt
flows.25Theresilienceofthesupplychainishencelinkedtoafailureofregulationonthe
supplyside.
Otheropenquestionsare:Howdopoachersandbuyerslocateoneanother?Orformulatedin
moregeneralterms:Howdosupply-sideactorsfindbuyersforillicitwildlifecontrabandin
supportfishinggovernancearrangementsduetosocio–politicalandculturalfactors,atop–downprocessofrule-makingandimplementationofthenewfisherymanagementsystem(Raemaekersetal.2011;Hauck2009).Inanexpressionofunhappinesswiththestatusquoandthequestforenvironmentalandsocialjustice,fisherscatchprotectedspeciesoffishinprotectedareasorexceedtheirquotas.Inordertosatisfyscientificandconservationagendas,thestateoftenpayslittleattentiontotheneedsoflocalpeoplelivinginornearconservationareas.
25Severalscholarsofferapro-tradestanceinpeer-reviewedjournals(Child2012;Conrad2012;Moyle2013;Biggsetal.2013;DiMininetal.2014),technicalreports(‘tSas–Rolfes2011;Martin2012;Ferreira/Pfab/Knight2014;Vigne2013)andgreyliterature(Eustace2012;‘tSas-Rolfes2012).Thesurgeinrhinopoachingisfrequentlylinkedtothetradeban.Tradeinhorn(andotherwildlifeproducts)issuggestedasaviablepolicyoptiontosavetherhinofromextinction.Proponentsofthisapproachofferdifferenttrademodels,suchaslegaltradethroughacentralsellingorganization(Martin2012),through‘futurestrading’(Interviewwithpro-tradeactivist,2013)oronce-offauctions(Msimang2012).Attheotherendofthespectrumistheanti-tradefaction,whosestanceandassociatedremedialpoliciesdifferinlevelsofpersuasion,explanationandalternativestrategiesoffered(Examplesinclude:Scholtz2012;Nadal/Aguayo2014;Collins,A./Fraser,G./Snowball,J.2013;Mason/Bulte/Horan2012).
31
overseasmarkets?Andviceversa(shouldthemarketbedemand-driven):Howdoesthe
prospectivebuyerofanillicitgoodpinpointasupplierlivingonanothercontinent?Whatare
therolesandfunctionsofotheractorsatthepointofsupply?Isthecontestationofrulesand
rule-makersanissueonlyatthesupply-endofthemarket?Thisdissertationaimstoaddress
theseopenquestions.
1.2.2RhinohorntradeasatransnationalorganizedsupplychainAnotherstreamofliteraturedescribesrhinohorntradeasa“globalsupplychain”or“global
productionchain”thatisdemand–drivenanddominatedbyorganizedcrimenetworks.
AustraliancriminologistAyling(2013)providesanuancedstructureofthisglobalsupplychain.
Shesubsumespoachingandorganizedcrimenetworksunderthecategoryof“harvesting
networks”.Ayling’sclassificationalsoincludestheftnetworksthatobtainrhinohornthrough
theftfrompublicandprivatestockpiles.Bothharvestingandtheftnetworksarelinkedto
distributionnetworksthatdistributerhinohorntoconsumers.Sheattributestheresilience26
oftherhinohornsupplychaintotheinherentfeaturesofcriminalnetworksandthe
operationalenvironmenttheyoperatein.Environmentalfactorsthatfacilitateresilience
include“non-orpartialimplementationofrules”,“socialnormsthatcontradicttherules”and
“theexistenceofcomplexorambiguousrulesandcorruption”(Ayling2013:76–77).She
identifiesgapsinknowledgegapswithregardstohowactorsfindeachotherandproceedto
establishtrust-basedrelationshipsandhowtheycommunicateandtradeacrossnational
borders(Ayling2013:75).Thequestionarisinghereiswhethertheserelationshipsare
necessarilyreliantontrust;orwhetherahealthydoseofdistrust,assuggestedbyGambetta
(1988b:166)inhisanalysisoftheSicilianmafia,accompaniedbysecrecy,duplicity,
intelligencesharingandbetrayal,characterizesuchrelationships.
Thequestionofwhetherrhinohornpoachinginspecificandillegalwildlifemarketsingeneral,
constituteaformoforganizedcrime27orwhetherorganizedcrimenetworksarethemain
26Ayling(2013:69)attributestwocapacitiestotheconceptofresilience,namely“theabilitytoabsorbandtherebywithstanddisruption”and“toadapt,whennecessary,tochangesarisingfromthatdisruption”.27Theconceptof‘organizedcrime’iscontested.Iwillproblematizethisinlatersectionsofthedissertation.Sufficetomentionherethatthetermisusedinterchangeablytodepictagroupofactorsorcriminalactivity.
32
players,isacontestedissueintheliterature.Aylingissomewhatambiguousinheranalysis,
citinganauthoritativereportproducedbyMillikenandShaw(2012)forthetrademonitoring
networkTRAFFIC.TheresearchersprovideadetaileddescriptionofSouthAfricanactors
involvedinthesupplychainbetweenSouthAfricaandVietnamandtheconsumermarketin
Vietnam.Accordingtothem,“theorganizationandplanningofSouthAfrica’srhinohorntrade
hasrapidlyevolvedintoasophisticatedandefficientphenomenon”(Milliken/Shaw2012:76).
Theassertionthatmultinationalcrimesyndicatesspecializinginabouquetofrelatedillicit
trades28havemovedintothelucrativetradeinrhinohorn(Milliken/Shaw2012:12),isnot
furtherexplainedorreferencedinthereport.MillikenandShawprofferahierarchical
structureofthelevelsoforganizedcrimeinvolvedintherhinohorntrade(seeGraph2).29
Graph2:Structureofrhinohornconduits
Source:adaptedfromMillikenandShaw(2012:61and78)anddataprovidedbySouthAfricanlawenforcementofficials
28Theseillicittradesincludedruganddiamondsmuggling,humantraffickingandeconomicexchangeofotherwildlifeproductslikeelephantivoryandabalone.29The‘levels’pyramidreflectsthethinkingofSouthAfricanlawenforcementagenciessuchastheDirectorateforPriorityCrimeInvestigations(DPCI)andtheNationalWildlifeCrimeReactionUnit(NWCRU).
Buyer/Consumer
International Exporter/
Buyer/Courier
National Courier/Middleman/Buyer
National Runner/Buyer
Poaching gangs, pseudo–hunters, stockpiled rhino horn
33
Itissuggestedthatlocal,nationalandinternationallevelsoforganizedcrimemanagethe
transnationaltradechain,ofwhichthehighestlevel“invariablycomprisedAsianindividuals”
(Milliken/Shaw2012:62).Montesh(2013:19)alsopointstotheroleofAfrican-basedAsian
syndicateleadersinthesupplychain,suggestinglinkstoorganizedcrimegroupssuchasthe
ChineseTriadsalreadyresidentinSouthAfrica.Itremainsunclearhowthedifferentlevelsof
organizedcrimeareconnectedtooneanother.Milliken(2014:18)explainsinasubsequent
TRAFFICreportthatLevel4operatives(internationalexporter,buyerorcourierasperGraph
2)are“African-basedAsianoperativeswithpermanentresidentorlong-termstatuswithin
keycountriessuchasSouthAfrica”.Theseoperativesassociatewithcorruptactorswithinthe
privatesectorandstate.Theyarehighlymobileandwell-financed,whichallowsthemto
travelinthesouthernAfricanregionsandAsiatosetupdeals(Milliken2014:18).Whilenot
furtherexplained,theimplicitsuggestionisthattheLevel4operativesfulfillabridging
functionbetweenpoachersandbuyersbywayofcooperativealliancesandcorruption.
Milliken’scontributionisthustheacknowledgmentoftheexistenceofaninterfacebetween
illegalityandlegality(thesignificanceoftheinterfaceisexplainedinthenextsection)andthe
useofcorruptionbycriminalplayerstoensurethecontinuedflowofrhinohornfromthe
sourcetothemarket.InvestigativejournalistJulianRademeyer(2012)30supportsthenotion
ofahierarchicalstructureunderpinningorganizedrhinoandwildlifetraffickingnetworksbut
healsopointstotheflexibilityandchangeabilityoftheoverallnetworkstructureandits
components.Rademeyertrackeddownthe“PabloEscobarofanimaltrafficking”,Laotian
nationalVixayKeosavang,whoisbelievedtoheadtheXayasavangnetwork.31Thekingpin
“remainedintheshadows,adistantpuppet-masterreapingtherewardsofthekillingbut
rarelydirtyinghisownhands”(Rademeyer2014b).Heexplainstheresilienceofthe
XayasavangnetworkbywayofKeosavang’sarms-lengthapproachtorunningthenetwork,
protectionfromarrestbyLaotianlawenforcementofficialsandhugefinancialresourcesas
comparedtothelesserresourcesoflawenforcementagencies,bureaucraticred–tapeand
“investigations[that]stopwherebordersstart”.HendrikandEliseDaffue(2013)providea
30Rademeyerresearchedtheillegalrhinohorntradeovera2-yearperiod,culminatinginthepublicationofhisnon-fictionbookKillingforProfit:Exposingtheillegalrhinohorntradein2012.31USauthoritiesissuedaonemillionDollarrewardforinformationleadingtothedismantlingofthenetworkin2013(Kerry2013).Thecriminalnetworkwasinvolvedinacleverscam,whichinvolvedthefalsificationofhuntingpermits.Theschemewillbediscussedinlatersectionsofthedissertation.
34
nuancedstructureoftheglobaltradechain(seeGraph3)inanewsletterpublicationofa
rhinoconservationNGO(formoredetailssee:Daffue2013).Thenewsletterprovidesa
detailedanalysisofthecompositionofrhinopoachinggroupsandtheirmodusoperandi,
dealingwithwhatistermedthe“collection”stageofthesupplychaininthegraph.The
authorsprovidenofurtherexplanationsastothemechanismsthatconnectthe‘collection’
stagetothesubsequentsegmentsofthehornconduits,otherthanthesidebar“someleaders
havelinksdirectlyintoMozambique”.
Thestatedroleoforganizedcrimeinrhinoandwildlifecrimesechoesthesentimentsof
severalorganizedcrimescholarsandhigh-levelpractitioners(Sellar2008;Bennett2012;
UNODC2010;Nellemannetal.2014;Gosling/Reitano/Shaw2014;Felbab-Brown2011).These
expertsseetransnationalorganizedcriminalsincreasinglyenteringtheillegalwildlifetradeas
a“low-riskandhigh-rewardactivity”(Cook/Roberts2002:4).
Graph3:Structureoforganizedrhinohornnetworks
Source:HendrikandEliseDaffue(2013)
35
RetiredCITESlawenforcementofficialJohnM.Sellar(2014c:2)notestheabilityoforganized
crimenetworkstoinnovateandtoventureintonewcommodities,territoriesandmarkets–
hebelievesthatthetradeinendangeredspeciesoffersalucrativenewbusinessopportunity.
Linkstoterroristandrebelgroupingshavealsobeensuggested,especiallyinrelationto
elephantpoachingandivorytraffickinginEastAfrica(Lopes2014;Cardamone2012;Levey
2007;BrookeDarby2014;Vira/Ewing2014).ViraandEwing(2014:3)argue:
“Atthemostmacrolevel,theivorytradeisessentiallyalarge-scaleillicitresourcetransferfromAfricatoAsia;ontheground,however,ivoryisbushcurrencyformilitants,militias,andterrorists,andoneofthemostvaluablepiecesofillicitcontrabandfororganizedcriminalsandcorruptelites.”
Organizedcrimescholarsandpractitionerslookatthestructureandcompositionoforganized
crimetoprovideanswersastowhythisgroupofactorsisdifficulttodisrupt.Withinthe
literaturefourmodelsoforganizedcrimehavebeensuggested(Standing2006:71–77):the
bureaucratic,network,clanormafia,andbusinessmodel.Thebureaucraticmodel(Cressey
1969)tallieswithMaxWeber’sunderstandingofarationalbureaucracy(Weber[1921]1972:
551–579).Socialorderisachievedthroughrulesandplanning,ahierarchicalawardstructure,
apredeterminedcontractsettingoutnormsandrulesofengagement,andareasof
specialization.Accordingtothenetworkmodel(Chambliss1988;Williams1998),actors
pursueaflat,flexibleandinformalapproachtocoordinatingcriminalactivities.Shared
economicobjectivesareachievedthroughrelationshipsbasedontrustwhilemutual
dependencyoperatesasthecentralcoordinatingmechanism(Standing2006:72–73).
Networksareformedthroughintroductionsandsharedconnections,whichcomplements
Granovetter’stheoryonthestrengthofweakties(Granovetter1983).32Paoli(2001)has
devisedthe‘clan’modeloforganizedcrime.Familyandkinshiptiesdeterminemembership
whilegrouployaltyandsolidarityarethecentralcoordinatingmechanisms.Accordingtothe
‘business’or‘enterprise’modeloforganizedcrime(Reuter1985;Schelling1967;Schelling
1978),rationaleconomicactorscoordinatecriminalactivitiesonthebasisofcost/benefit
32Granovetter(1983:1378)arguesthatweaktiesareessentialtoanindividual’sopportunitiesandintegrationintocommunitieswhilestrongtiesleadtolocalcohesionbutoverallfragmentation.IwillreturntoGranovetter’sassumptionsinthenextsection.
36
calculations.33Marketforcesarebelievedtoshapethecoordinationandorganizationof
crime.Indirectcontradictionoftheotherthreemodels,Reuter(1985)arguesthat‘organized
crime’seldomachievesmonopolycontrolinillegalmarketsduetoeconomicforcesincluding
economiesofscale,andpeculiaritiestoillegalmarkets(suchaslegallyunenforceable
contracts).AccordingtoReuter,organizedcrimemaymakeuseofviolencetoincreaseits
marketshareinillegalmarkets;however,theuseorthreatofviolencecomeswithitsown
potentialpitfallssuchascompetitionbyotherviolentgroupsorunwantedattentionfromlaw
enforcers(Reuter1985:20–21).Bothelements–theuseorthreatofviolenceand
competition–constituteimportantanalyticalconsiderationsinunderstandingillegalmarkets
andhencedeservefurtherattentioninthesectionontheoreticalframing(discussedinthe
nextsection).
Cost/benefitcalculationsconstituteexplicitrationalchoiceassumptionsofthebusinessmodel34-theothermodelsarehoweveralsosteepedinrationalchoiceassumptions.Scholars
presenteachorganizedcrimemodelasasuperiorcrimecoordinationmechanismagainst
regulation(lawenforcement).Moreover,theofficiallyrecognizedbutcontesteddefinitionof
organizedcrimeemphasizestheprofitmotifoforganizedcrimeirrespectiveoftheidealtype
ormodel.35Lawenforcementresponsestodisruptordismantleorganizedcrimearetailored
accordingtotheassumptionsofthepreferredmodeloforganizedcrime,ignoringhybrid
formationsorthetransnationalreachofsomeorganizedcrimegroups.Nonetheless,the
compositionandstructureoforganizedcrimegroups,assuggestedbythesemodels,shed
lightonquestionsoftrust,groupcohesion,andcontrol,andthusontheissueoftheresilience
ofsuchgroups.Theseinsights,however,donotconstituteasufficientexplanationofthe
33Elementsofthepreviousparagraphwereusedaspartofapaperentitled“Economicsociologyandopportunitiesfororganizedcrimeresearch”inEconomicSociology–TheEuropeanElectronicNewsletter.ThenewsletterwaspublishedinJuly2015andisavailableat:http://econsoc.mpifg.de/archive/econ_soc_16-3.pdf#page=38.34Curiously,economistshadinitiallysnubbedorganizedcrimeresearchduetotheperceptionthatcriminalactorswereirrational,andthefieldwasbettersuited“toasociologicalanalysisofpathologiesanddeviances”(Fiorentini/Peltzman1997:2).35StateactorsinvolvedinthePalermonegotiationsleadingtothefinaltextoftheUnitedNationsConventionagainstTransnationalOrganizedCrimeagreedthatfourcharacteristicswereessentialcriteriaofthecrime.Organizedcrimethusinvolvedagroupoftwoormorepersons,whowereactinginconcerttocommita“serious”crimerepeatedlyforfinancialormaterialgain(UnitedNationsGeneralAssembly15November2000).
37
resilienceofillegalmarkets.Theclanmodel,forexample,suggeststhattrustiscontingenton
membershipofthegroupandreproducedthroughfamilyorkinshipties.Theinternalcontrol
structurecentresonomertà36andenforcementofthesameoathagainstthosewhobreakit.
AssuggestedbyGambetta(1988b),distrustofone’sassociatesandbusinesspartnersmight
leadtoadditionalsecurityprecautions.Trustwithinnetworkorbusiness-likestructuresmight
benegotiatedthroughdifferentstrategiessuchasreputationandtherelianceonexistingor
previousnetworkconnectionswithinlegalandillegalmarkets.Anothermechanismrelatesto
thetrickyissueofinformationsharing:operationalinformationmightthusbesharedona
need-to-knowbasiswiththosenetworksornodesnecessaryfortheexecutionofaplanned
activity.Inthecaseofdefectionorneutralization,onlythosedirectlylinkedtothenodeor
network(strongties)mightbetemporarilyorpermanentlydisabled.Thefourmodelsare
presentedasstand-aloneandopposingidealtypesintheorganizedcrimeliterature.Each
model,therefore,carriesexplicitnormativeassumptionswithregardstothebenefitsofits
associatedtypeofcrimecoordinationandsuitablelawenforcementinterventions.Scholars
facethedangerofparadigmaticconvergencebypresentingortailoringdatatosuitthe
normativeandtheoreticalassumptionsoftheirchosenmodel(Standing2003:17).Criminal
entitiesarehoweverunlikelytoconformtoanyoneofthesuggestedmodels(ibid).Infact,
crimecoordinationmayrelyonhybridformationsthatalignwiththegeographic,politicaland
temporalcontext,aswellasthepersonalpreferencesofthoseinvolved(Standing2003:20).
Afinalnoteworthyaspectoforganizedcrimeliteratureisthedominantnarrativeof
stigmatizing“theother”.Althoughtheso-called‘alienconspiracytheory’37hasbeen
discreditedintheliterature(Varese2011;Gambetta2009;Naylor2004(b);Reuter1987);
stereotypicalnotionsof“goodversusevil”oranunderworldofcriminalsversusaseaoflaw-
abidingcitizenspersistsinmuchoftheliterature.38Ofconcernintherhinoliteratureisthe
36‘Omerta’referstothecodeofsilencepractisedbysomemafiagroups,preventingMafiosifromcooperatingwithagentsofthestate.Similaroaths,signs,andsymbolshavebeenobservedintheTriads,Yakuzaandstreetgangs.37ThealienconspiracytheorywasborneoutoffindingsoftheUSSenate’sKefauverCommittee.Thereportidentifiedorganizedcrimewiththemafiaormafia-likegroups(foreigners).Thesegroupsweresupposedlyhierarchicallyorganized,threatenedtheintegrityoflocalgovernmentwhileinfiltratinglegitimatebusinessandsubvertingtheintegrityofafreesociety.38BearepostulatesthatthisnarrativeisalsovisibleintheinternationalconceptualizationoforganizedcrimeaspertheUnitedNationsConventionagainstTransnationalOrganizedCrime(UnitedNationsGeneralAssembly15
38
“othering”andstigmatizationofforeigncriminalswhiletheroleoflocalcrimesyndicates,
wildlifeindustryplayersandstateactorsisdownplayed(Daffue2013;Montesh2013).This
furthercontributestoestablishednotionsofforeignor“transnational”organizedcrime
networksdisruptingpoliticalgovernanceandeconomicstructuresinsouthernAfricawhile
localor“indigenous”criminalgroupsserveasthefootsoldiersoftheseforeigngroups(see
forexample:Standing2003).Corruptionispresentedasakeystrategyoforganizedcrimeto
underminethegovernment,lawenforcement,andtheformaleconomy.Theideaofaforeign-
dominatedparasiticconspiracythatridesontheweaknessesofregulatoryandlegislative
structuresassuggestedintheliteratureiscriticallyinterrogatedinthisdissertation.The
relianceonthistraditionalnotionof‘organizedcrime’asthedrivingforcebehindtheillegal
rhinohornmarketignorestheroleofother‘non-criminal’actorswithinthesupplychain,such
astheroleofconsumers,culturalframesthatinfluencevaluation,tastesandpreferences
(Dewey2014a:5–6).
Whilethesemodelsprovidepartialexplanandaastowhyorganizedcrimeisresilientandwhy
someillegalmarketsaredifficulttodisrupt,thesocialembeddednessofillegaleconomic
action,theimpactofregulationontheorganizationalstructureofillegalmarkets,the
interfacebetweenlegalityandillegality,aswellasculturalexplanationsfortheresilienceof
illegalmarketsconstitutegapsinexistingliteratureandresearch.Animportantanalytical
considerationiswhetherthedifficultyofdisruptingrhinohornmarketsislinkedtotheprofile
oftheactors(suchasthecompositionandstructureoforganizedcrime),orwhetherintrinsic
(valuationofrhinohorn)andstructuralfeaturesrelatingtothemarketanddifferentflowsof
hornprovidesufficientorpartialexplanandaoftheresilienceofrhinohornsupplychains.
Similartotheresearchgappointedoutintheprevioussub-section,thisstreamofliterature
fallsshortofprovidingaconvincinganswerastohowdifferentsegmentsintherhinohorn
supplychainareinterlinked.Putdifferently,usingthesuggestedhierarchicalmodelof
organizedrhinocrimes:Howdothevariouslevelsintherhinohornorganizedcrimehierarchy
connecttooneanother?Putintoasociologicalperspective:Howareillegaleconomicactions
November2000).Accordingtoher,theconvention“reproducesaglobalhegemonicrhetoricandcountermeasuresthatdependonthepublic’sperceptionofagrowingthreatoftransnationalcrimethatoriginatesfromcountriesforeigntothe‘developed’metropolis,ledbyorganized‘mafia’-likenetworksandgangsterswhoareseentothreatenthepeaceandsecurityofthecorecapitalistnations,andrequiringastateresponseofstrictborderandimmigrationcontrols”(Beare2003:XVIII).
39
atthemicro-level(poaching,illegalharvestingandtheft)connectedtotradestructuresatthe
macro-level(horntraffickinganddistribution)?Withregardstotheoverallrhinohornmarket
structure,anopenquestionpertainstowhetherthenotionof“organizedcrime”asconceived
intherhinoandbroaderorganizedcrimeliteratureisausefulconceptualandtheoretical
construct,orwhetheritservestomuddytheanalyticalwatersandfeedsintoregulatory
objectives.
1.2.3Rhinohorntradeasamulti-actorbusinessenterpriseThedominantnarrativeassignsorganizedcrimeasarisingifnotdominantactorinillicit
wildlifemarkets,afewresearchers(Ellis1994;Naylor2004;Wyatt2009;Wyatt2011)
nonethelesspointtothesignificantroleofagentsofthestate,thewildlifeindustryand
conservationNGOsinsuchmarkets.Inthisstreamofliterature,illegalrhinohorntradeis
describedasabusinessenterprisefacilitatedbyamultitudeofdiverseactorswithclose,
limitedornolinksto‘organizedcrime’.Insiderknowledgeofmarketstructuresandexposure
oraccesstopoliticaloreconomicelitesrendersuchactorsimportantfacilitatorsor
intermediariesofillegalwildlifemarkets.Theissueofagencyintheillegalwildlifemarketsis
notonlytheoreticallysignificantbutalsobearspolicyconsequencesintherealworld.
Regulatoryresponsesto‘insidertrading’withinthewildlifeindustry,corruptionandcollusion
betweenstateandindustryplayers,asopposedtoorganizedcrimeandterrornetworks,are
likelytodifferintermsoftheperceivedseriousnessofthecrime,punishmentand
recompenses.
Severalreportsattempttodebunktheascendancyoforganizedcrimeinwildlifecrime.A
reportissuedonbehalfofWWFandTRAFFICin2002forexample,foundlimitedevidenceof
theinvolvementof“major”organizedcrimegroups39inillegalwildlifemarkets(Cook/Roberts
2002).TheauthorsobserveanexceptionwithregardstoillegalcaviarmarketsinRussiaand
“inkeydrugproductionanddistributionstateswhichcoincidewithmajorrangestatesfor
wildlife”(Cook/Roberts2002:23).Schneider(2012:53)postulatesthatduetotransnational39Theauthorsdenoteas“major”organizedcrimegroupswell-knownSouthAmerican,WestAfrican,Chinese,WestIndianandRussiannetworks.
40
criminalshavingmasteredtheartoftraffickinglegalandillegalcontrabandandpeopleacross
borders,theinferencethatsuchcriminalsmightbeinvolvedintheillegalwildlifetradeisnot
far-fetched.Beyondtheillegaltradeinsturgeon/caviar,abalone,sharkfinandtigers,she
found,however,anecdotalandspeculativeevidenceonlytosuggestthelink(Schneider2012:
57).Naylor(2004:263)referstothe“recurrentfables”of“OrganizedCrime”(Naylor’s
capitalization)operatinginillegalwildlifemarkets“alongwithstoriesaboutlinksbetween
wildlifetraffickinganddrugsmuggling,andparallelclaimsthatthecontrabandinwildlife
rankssecondonlytothatindrugsintermsofvalue”.Naylor(2004:opcit)pointstothe
dominantroleofthewildlifeindustryandcorruptstateofficialsintheillegalwildlifetrade:
“Inrealitythisisabusinesslargelyrunbyindustryinsidersfromtheforesttothefactory,fromprimaryacquisitiontofinalsale,althoughitmaybeaidedandabettedbycomplicitpoliticiansandcorruptfunctionaries.”
GreencriminologistTanyaWyatt(2009)foundthatstrictregulationoftheRussianfurtrade
constitutedsignificantbarrierstoentry,preventing‘organizedcrime’andother‘outsiders’
fromenteringthelucrativeillegaltrade.Localimpoverishedvillagersfromthetaiga,
registeredhunters,wealthyindividuals,andlawenforcementofficialspoach,huntorlaytraps
forwildanimalswhosepeltsaredestinedforthefurtrade.Well-heeledpeoplewithpolitical
connectionsorbusinessinterestsinthelegalfurtradeactastheintermediariesandlaunder
illegallyobtainedpeltsintolegaltradechannels.Cook(2002:23)arguesthatfamiliaritywith
tradecontrols,governmentregulations,andtransportrouteswouldprovideactorsalreadyin
thelegaltradewithknowledgeofthe‘tricksofthetrade’andpossiblelegalloopholesto
exploitopportunitiesinillegalmarkets.40
Alimitednumberofscholarscastthenetbeyondthe‘usualsuspects’–poachersand
organizedcrime–inresearchanalysingtherhinohornsupplychain.StephenEllis(1994)
providesasuccinctanalysisoftheSouthAfricanapartheidstate’sinvolvementintheivory
andrhinohorntradestructuresofthe1970sand1980sbyshowinghowtheseillicittrades
financedtheSouthAfricansecretservicesandindividualslinkedtothem.Thehistorian40SomestudiespointtothefalsificationofCITESpermits,import/exportcustomsdocumentsortothemanipulationofdomesticpermittingsystemsregulatingdomesticorcross-bordertradeoflivewildlifeorwildlifeproducts(Naylor2004;Schneider2012;Felbab-Brown2011),andspecificallyinthecaseofrhinos(Rademeyer2012;Falberg2013;Milliken/Shaw2012;Orenstein2013;Leader-Williams2003).
41
providesfascinatinginsightsonthenexusbetweenthemilitaryapparatusandconservation
actorsinsouthernAfrica,whicharenotonlyrelevanttocurrentdebatesrelatingtothe
militarizedconservationparadigmbutalsopointtothepossiblebeginningsofablurring
betweenlegalandillegalmarketexchangesinrhinohorn.Otherresearchers(Rademeyer
2012;Milliken2014;Milliken/Shaw2012;AnimalRightsAfrica2009)depictthecomplicitrole
ofwildlifeindustryactorsalongrhinohornsupplychains.Rademeyer(2012),forexample,
showstheinvolvementofthe“boeremafia”(whiteAfrikanerswhoareinvolvedinthewildlife
industry)intheillegalrhinohorntrade.Whileauthorsdescribepermitfraudandthe
launderingofillegallyharvestedhornintolegalflows,theliteratureremainssilentonthe
socialmechanismsandmarketstructuresthatenabletheseflows.
Italsoremainsunclearhowwildlifeindustryactors(andthe‘usualsuspects’)areconnectedto
Asiandistributionnetworks.Anothergaprelatestohowactorsmakeinitialcontactand
establishbusinessrelationsdespitecleavagesbasedonlanguage,culture,nationality,social
statusandethnicity.Moreover,littleisknownabouttheverticalandhorizontalintegrationof
thesediverseactorsinthetransnationaltradechain.Whilethepublicdiscourseonthe“rhino
crisis”isincreasinglysteeredtowardsthe‘underworld’oforganizedcrimeandterrorism,
importantquestionsrelatingtotheinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegalityremain
unresolved.
Meanwhile,scholarsfromthefieldofantiquitiestraffickinghaveshiftedthetheoreticalfocus
fromstaticstructuralnotionsof‘organizedcrime’toconceivingofhybridformationsthat
movelootedculturalobjectsfromthesourcetothemarket.MackenzieandDavis’research
intotheanatomyofantiquitiestraffickingnetworksinCambodiaprovidessignificantinsights
ontheintegrationof‘groups’and‘networks’ofactorsusingasocialcapitalapproach
(Mackenzie/Davis2014).41Thescholarsidentifytradechannelsalongwhichlootedartefacts
aremovedfromcultural-historicalsitestotheinternationalmarketbuyer(frequentlya
legitimatetradeoutlet).Theresponsibletraffickingnetworksare“stable,hierarchicaland
41WingLo(2010:868)pioneeredasocialcapitalframingandappliedittoastudyofTriadsocietiesinHongKongandChina.Heidentifiedinternal‘bondingcapital’intraditionalhierarchicalorganizedcrimegroups,togetherwithhorizontal‘bridging’andvertical‘linking’capital.Thesesocialcoordinationmechanismsprovideopportunitiesforillegaltrade,includingthecollusionwithotherlegitimateandillegitimategroups,orcorruptstateinterests.
42
repetitivelyfunctioningsupplychains”(Mackenzie/Davis2014:16).Giventhemanyparallels
betweenantiquitiesandwildlifetraffickingsupplychains,42theirconclusion(Mackenzie/Davis
2014:4)provideshelpfulhintsonhowtomodelrhinohornsupplychains:
“Broadlystated,ourconclusionwillbethatwhilethepresentcasestudyisundoubtedlyofanetwork,inwhichnodes,contactsandcertaintypesofsocialcapitalareusefulexplanatoryconcepts,thereisalsoanobservablestability,andidentifiableformsofhierarchy,bothalongthechainofthewholenetworkandwithineachofitsnodes.Weconceptualizethenetworkasarepetitiveprocess,havingdevelopedbywayoflinkingnodalactorsinlong-termtradingrelations,andharnessingthebenefitsatdifferentstagesinthechainofbothlocalizedterritorial‘structure-controlled’organizedcrimeand(asthetradesmoveincreasinglytowardsthetransnational)moreflexibleentrepreneurialtrafficker-dealerswhoarelesstiedintoframeworksinvolvingterritoryorgroup.”
1.2.4SynthesizingtheresearchgapsTheearliersub-sectionswereaimedathighlightingimportanttheoreticalcontributionsand
gapswithintheliterature.Anoverviewoftheliteratureonthedemandorconsumermarket
wasexcludedfromtheliteraturereviewastoolittleisknowntowarrantaseparate
subsection.Whenitcomestothedistributionandtradeofrhinohorninconsumermarkets,
theliteraturepredominantlyreferstothetraditionalmedicinesmarketsinAsia(‘tSas-Rolfes
2012;Nowell2012a;Drury2009;Rademeyer2012).Severaltechnicalreportsandjournalistic
investigations(IpsosMarketing2013;Milliken/Shaw2012;Gwin2012;Amman2013b)
referencenewdemandandusergroupsandareconsideredassuchinthechapterdealing
withthedemandandvaluationofrhinohorn.Withregardstounderstandingthedemandfor
rhinohorn,manyopenquestionsremain.Itisunclearwhyconsumersarewillingtopaya
premiumforakeratin-likesubstanceandhowqualitycontrolisenforcedinlightofthehigh
42AlderandPolker(2005)andBrodie(2003)notesimilaritiesregardingthefunctioningoftheillicitsupplychain,differentiation,themainactorsandroles,exploitativeeffects,smugglingnetworksandcorruptiveinfluences.Bowman(2008:226)arguesthatunlikeothertraffickedgoods,thetradeinantiquitiesislegalperse;however,theillicitsourcehastobedisguisedtorenderthestolenartefactprofitable.Whenitcomestograyflowsofwildlifecontraband,theillicitsource(poaching)isalsochangedtolegalsources(trophyhunting).Moreover,illegalwildlifecontrabandisequallysoldathighpricestobuyersofhighsocio-economicstatus(Bowman2008)orthoseseekingupwardsocialmobility.
43
incidenceoffakerhinohornatthesourceandintheconsumermarket(Amman2013a).Other
unansweredquestionspertaintothestructureandfunctioningofdistributionandtrade
networks.
Insynthesizingthecontributionsofexistingliteratureontheillegalrhinohorntrade,several
gapsandshortcomingshavebeennoted.Thedifferentstreamsofliteraturesufferfrom
theoreticalseparatenessinthatonlyaspecificaspectorsegmentoftheillegaltradechainis
considered.Whilescholarsacknowledgetheexistenceofa“globalsupplychain”orofa
“transnationaltradechain”,itremainsunclearhowthedifferentsegmentsofthesupplychain
arebridgedacrosscleavagesfromdifferentnationalities,ethnicities,socialstrata,languages,
andcultures.Withafewnotableexceptions(Ellis1994;Milliken/Shaw2012;Rademeyer
2012;Naylor2004),scholarsfocusonthe“usualsuspects”–poachersandorganizedcriminals
–withoutinterrogatingtheroleofthestate,thewildlifeindustry,andotheractors.The
resilienceofthesupplychainislinkedtoshortcomingswithintheregulatoryframework.
Scholarsrecommendthatthestateshouldputmore“bootsontheground”(increased
securitizationandmilitarization),amendtheregulatoryframeworkorrefocusattentiontothe
perceivedorganizedcrimethreat.Afewscholars(Büscher/Ramutsindela2016;Lunstrum
2014;Massé/Lunstrum2016)havequestionedtheprudenceofsuchmeasures,thereby
pointingtotheflawedbasisoftheregulatoryframework.Others(Ayling2013;von
Essen/Allen2015)havearguedthattheperceivedillegitimacyofrulesandnormsmight
provideaconduciveenvironmentforwildlifecrimetoflourish.Withtheexceptionofthefinal
streamofliterature(subsection1.2.3),scholarshavepaidlimitedattentiontotheinterface
betweenlegalityandillegality.Anopenquestionrelatestotheroleof‘organizedcrime’inthe
illegalrhinohorntradeandhowregulationimpactstheglobalsupplychain.Noneofthese
streamsofliteraturedeliversasatisfactoryanswerastowhytherhinohasnotbeenbetter
protectedinlightofthemyriadmeasurestodisruptillegalrhinohornmarkets.Itisagainst
thisbackgroundthatatheoreticalframeworkbasedonthesociologyofmarketsinthefieldof
economicsociologyisproposedinthefollowingsection.
44
1.3Theoreticalframing Atheoreticalapproachgroundedineconomicsociologyhasbeenchosentoaddressthegaps
identifiedintheprevioussection.Thistheoreticallensoffersboththeoreticalandempirical
integrationbystudyingnetworks,institutions,andcognitiveframes.Therecognitionthat
marketsaresocially,culturallyandpoliticallyembeddedisofsignificancehere.Economic
sociologistsareconcernedwithunderstanding(“verstehen”)thesocialembeddedness43of
economicactionandinstitutions(Granovetter/Swedberg2011:XIX).Granovetter(1985:487)
explains:
“Actorsdonotbehaveordecideasatomsoutsideasocialcontext,nordotheyadhereslavishlytoascriptwrittenforthembytheparticularintersectionofsocialcategoriesthattheyhappentooccupy.Theirattemptsatpurposiveactionareinsteadembeddedinconcrete,ongoingsystemsofsocialrelations.”
Strategicsitesofinquirywithineconomicsociologyincludemarkets,socialnetworksand
institutions.Whileagrowingbodyofliteratureconsidersthestructureandmechanicsofthe
informaleconomy,44thestudyofillegalandtransnationalmarketsremainsunderstudiedin
thefieldofeconomicsociology.45SpecificcaveatsidentifiedbyBeckertandWehinger(2011),
43Granovetterrevivedtheconceptof“embeddedness”inhismuch-citedarticlepublishedin1985,whichsuggestedthateconomicactionwasembeddedinsocialstructures(Granovetter1985).Thearticleinspiredmanysociologiststobecomeinterestedinthefieldandgaveanewlifetotheconceptof“embeddedness”,whichhadfeaturedinKarlPolanyi’scollaborativebook‘Tradeandmarketintheearlyempires’(Polanyi/Arensberg/Pearson1957).Polanyi’susageoftheconceptwaslimitedtopre-industrialsocieties,whichhedeemedtobeembeddedinsocial,religiousandpoliticalinstitutions.Tohimandotherscholars,theIndustrialRevolutionpresentedawatershed.Asofthen,economictransactionswerenolongerdefined“bythesocialorkinshipobligationsofthosetransactingbutbyrationalcalculationsofindividualgain”(Granovetter,1985:482).44LabouranthropologistKeithHartcoinedtheterm“informaleconomy”afterconductingresearchonurbanlabourmarketsinGhanaduringthe1970s.Hepostulatedadualistsystemofincomeopportunitiesoftheurbanlabourforcebydistinguishingbetweenwagelabourandself-employment.TheWorldBank,theInternationalLabourOrganization(ILO)andmanyothershavesincere-appropriatedtheconcept,andithasbecomesomewhatcontestedindevelopmentliterature.Severalconceptuallyandtheoreticallyinterestingresearchstudieshavebeenpublishedinrecentyears(Hart1990;Portes/Haller2005;Portes2010;Feige1989;DeSoto1989;Jenkins1988;Schneider2002;Fernández-Kelly/Shefner2006).Geertz(1978:120-121)inhisseminaltextoninformaleconomiesshows,forexample,howthequestforinformationinMoroccanbazaars“isanadvancedart(…),amatteruponwhicheverythingturns.”45AmongstthefewpublishedcontributionsareBeckertandWehinger’stheoreticalandconceptualframeworkforillegalmarkets(Beckert/Wehinger2011;Beckert/Wehinger2013);Wehinger’smonographcomprisingadetailedreviewofliteratureonillegalmarkets(Wehinger2011);andjournalarticlesontheemergenceofillegalmarketsafteracrisisscenario(Dewey2014a),policeprotectionintheusedcarpartsmarketinArgentina(Dewey2011),“streetcapital”andcannabisdealinginNorway(Sandberg2008),theimportanceofcultureintheillegal
45
includeamongstothers,theorganizationalfeaturesofillegalmarkets,theinterfacebetween
legalandillegalmarketsandtheroleofthestateinillegalmarkets.Thesecaveatsdovetail
withtheresearchgapsidentifiedintheprevioussection.Inspiteofscholarlyinterestin
globalization,economicsociologistshavealsopaidscantattentionto‘global’or
‘transnational’markets(Aspers2011:175;Quack2009:125).Quack(2009:134)attributesthe
lacunatoscholarlypreoccupationwiththenationstateasthesolepoliticalauthorityandthe
preferenceforperceivingmarketsasunifiedsocialorders.Transnationalmarketsare“likelyto
bepopulatedbyactorswithheterogeneousculturalandinstitutionalorientations”.
Thedisciplineofeconomicsociologyprovidesnuancedideasastothetheoreticalintegration
ofsocialnetworks,institutionsandcognitiveframeswhenexplainingthestructureand
functioningofmarkets.Thefollowingsub-sectionswillhighlighttheoreticalconstructs,the
explanatoryapproachandargumentofthedissertation.
1.3.1RhinohornmarketsaresociallyembeddedOfinteresttomyprojectisthesubfieldofthesociologyofmarkets,whichattemptsto
“understandtheorigins,operations,anddynamicsofmarketsassocial
structures”(Fligstein/Dauter2007:106).Thesubfieldincludes,amongstothers,thestudyof
firmsandcommoditymarkets,relationshipsbetweensuppliers,workersandregulatory
institutionsandtheroleoflocalculturesassystemsofmeaningsinsofarastheyinfluence
productpreferences,andtheroleofmoralnormsinthegenerationofparticularkindsof
markets.Marketsareseenasthecoreeconomicinstitutionsofcapitalisteconomies.While
enablinganeconomicmechanismfortheallocationofgoodsandservices,marketsarealso
socialinstitutions,inseparablyinterwovenwiththepolitical,social,andculturalenvironments
inwhichtheyoperate(Beckert2009).Economicsociologistshaveemployedanumberof
explanatorymechanismstoexplaintheemergenceandfunctioningofmarkets,suchas
marketsasnetworks(Granovetter1985;White1981);marketsasinstitutions
drugeconomy(Sandberg2012)andwhyNorwegiancannabisgrowerskeepasmall-scaleproduction(Hammersvik/Sandberg/Pedersen2012).
46
(DiMaggio/Powell1983;Fligstein2001a);marketsasfields(Bourdieu[2000]2005(a);
Bourdieu2005(b));andtheperformativityapproachwhichexaminestheroleofeconomic
theoryinmarketstructuration(MacKenzie2003;Callon1998).Inemployingoneofthese
explanatorymechanismsorbyfocusingonspecificaspectsofmarkets,scholarlycontributions
maysufferfrom“theoreticalseparateness”(Fligstein/Dauter2007:2).Tocircumventthis
shortcomingandcognizantofthelacunaenotedintheliteraturereview,thenotionof
marketsasfieldsisusedasthetheoreticalbackboneofthedissertation.
Thisapproachintegratessocialnetworks,institutionsandcognitiveframes,andregardsthem
asirreduciblemacrostructureswhilealsoofferinganuancedexplanatorymechanismthat
incorporatesstructureandagency(Beckert2010:611).Accordingtothistrainofthought,
marketsarecomposedof“aheterogeneousgroupofactorsthatconstituteasocialarenaby
orientingtheiractionstowardeachother”(Fligstein2001b:108).Actorsinthemarketfield
areproducers,consumersandintermediaryregulatoryagenciesrangingfromthestateto
unions,lobbying,advocacyandsocialmovementgroups(Beckert2010:611).Beckert(2010:
612)positsthat:“[e]achofthethreestructuringforcescontributestothesocialorganization
ofmarketexchangesbyshapingopportunitiesandconstraintsofagentsaswellas
perceptionsoflegitimacyandillegitimacy.”Theissueofagencyisdealtwiththrough
recognisingthefollowing:
“Agencyinfieldsisstructuredbytheinfluencesthatsocialforcesexerciseontheactorswhopopulatethefield.Theseforcesconsistoftherelationaltopographiesofnetworks,theinstitutionalrulesprevalentinthefield,andcognitiveframesstructuringtheperceptionsofagents”(Beckert2010:611–612).
Althoughtheframeworkwasconceivedforlegalmarkets,itwillbearguedthatthesame
typesofactorsarerelevanttoillegalandgreymarkets.Withregardstothechosenproduct
marketofthisdissertation–rhinohorn–legalandillegalproducers(poachers,hunters,
thieves,wildlifeprofessionalsandagentsofthestate),transporters(organizedcrimegroups,
wildlifeprofessionalsandagentsofthestate),intermediaryregulatoryagencies(the
internationalcommunitythroughCITES,representativesofthestate,conservationNGOs,
privatesecuritycompanies,andbusinesses),aswellasconsumersinteractandstructurethe
marketforrhinohorn.Ofsignificanceisthattheglobalmarketforrhinohornconsistsoflegal,
47
grayandillegalflows,whichraisesintriguingquestionsastowhetherthesameactorsareof
importanceineachflowandwhetherthereareconnectionsbetweenthedifferentflows
(interfacebetweenlegal,grayandillegalmarket),asopposedtounderstandingthe
connectionsbetweendifferentsegmentsofthesupplychainonly.Theinstitutionalrulesare
butoneofthestructuringforcesinfluencingtheflowofrhinohorn.
1.3.2Defining‘illegalmarkets’andintroducingthenotionof‘flows’Theglobalrhinohorntradeisunderstoodintermsofasociologicaldefinitionofmarkets,
whichdescribesmarketsas“arenasofregularvoluntaryexchangeofgoodsorservicesfor
money,[goodsorservicesofequitablevalue]46…underconditionsofcompetition”(Beckert
andAspers(2008)citedin:Beckert/Wehinger2013:7).Marketsarethusnotonly
characterizedbyeconomicexchangebuttheyalsoinvolvecompetitionwherebyatleastthree
actorsarepittedagainstoneanotheratthesupplyanddemandendofthemarket(Beckert
2007:7).Weber(quotedinAbercrombie,Nicholas/Hill,Stephen/Turner,BryanS.[1984]2006)
definedcompetitionasapeacefulconflicttoattaincontroloverscarceresources.Inthe
contextofthisdissertation,Weber’sdefinitionisparticularlyinterestingasrhinosarenotonly
rare,buttheyarealsoendangered.Thequestionarisinghereiswhethercompetitionislikely
tobecomeless‘peaceful’andmoreviolentasrhinonumberscontinuetodwindle.The
subsectiononcompetitionwilldealwiththisinmoredetail.Asignificantfactorleadingtothe
emergenceofmarketsisthatmarketactorsneedtoshowinterestintheexchangeofthe
goodsorservices.Conflictsmay,however,ariseasregardsthepriceorspecificationsofthe
productsorservicestobetraded.Ultimatelytheactorshavetoreachacompromiseforthe
economicexchangetosucceed(ibid).Basedontheassumptionofmutualrespectforproperty
rights,marketexchangesoughttobevoluntaryandpeacefulintheformalsector
(Aspers/Beckert2011:4-5).
46JensBeckerthasadjustedhisdefinitionofmarketstoincludeexchanges,whicharenotsubjecttomoneytransactionsbutcouldinvolvethebarterorexchangeofsimilargoodsorservices(Ph.D.consultationbetweenJensBeckertandAnnetteHübschle,2014).Anobviousadvantageofavoidingmonetarytransactionsisthelackofpaperoraudittrail,thusrenderingobsoletethe“followthemoney”approachoflawenforcementagencies.
48
Marketsareconsideredillegaliftheproductperse,itsexchangeorconsumptionviolateslegal
stipulations.Thestatedeniespropertyrightsinsuchmarkets,setsandenforcesnoquality
standardsandhasthepowertoprosecutemarketactors(Beckert/Wehinger2013:7).47What
rendersamarket“illegal”is,therefore,amatteroflegaldefinitionandmaydifferbetween
legaljurisdictionsandacrosstime(Beckert/Wehinger2013:7).Thefactthatanelementofan
economicexchangeisdeemedillegalinaspecificplaceatacertainpointintimebearsnot
onlyactionableconsequencesfortheactorsbutislikelytoimpactthestructureand
functioningofthemarket(comparewiththesectionon‘contestedillegality’).Adistinction
needstobemadewithregardstoeconomicexchangesthatoccurattheinterfacebetween
legalityandillegality;thesemarketsareneitherlegalnorillegalastheyhoverinan
undeterminedgrayzone.Somemarketactorsmayexploitlegalorenforcementloopholesin
whatIterm‘graymarkets’.Actorscapitalizeonambiguitiesofthelegal/illegalitynexusby
falsifyingtheprovenanceofatradedgoodasaformerlylegalcommodity(e.g.pre-CITEShorn)
orconvertanillegallyacquiredgoodtoa‘legal’commodity(e.g.poachedhornisconverted
intotrophyhuntedrhinohorn).
Afurtherconsiderationrelatestothetransnationalnatureoftheillegalmarketinrhinohorn.
Historically,marketandplacewerecloselyintertwined.Whilemarketsofteninvolvedthe
inclusionoflongdistancetradeandforeignmerchants,marketswereconnectedtothesocial
andeconomiclivesoflocalcommunities,occurringatfixedintervalsandinspecificplaces–
thelocalmarketplace(Zukin1993:6).Withtheemergenceofmigrantlabourandhuttaxes
duringthecolonialerainthesouthernAfricancontext,48marketandplacestartedto
separate.Producers,tradersandconsumersnolongerhadtobeatafixedtimeandlocation
toengageineconomicexchange.Inthecurrentclimateofinstantaneouscapitalflows,global
transactionsandvirtualmarketplaces,economictransactionsarefluidanddifficulttopolice
orlocate.Inrecognitionofthefluidanddynamicstructureofthemarket,theconceptof
transnationalflows(insteadofcommodityorsupplychains)isemployedinthisdissertation.
47Government’sabilitytoprosecutemarketactorsisnotonlyrestrictedtoillegalmarkets.Thestatemayequallyprosecutemarketactorsinlegalorgraymarkets.48AsimilarpatterncanbeobservedinWesternEuropeduringIndustrialization(seeforexamplePolanyi/Arensberg/Pearson1957).
49
Theconceptofflowsisusefulinshowcasingthefluidconnectionsandcrossoversbetween
legal,illegalandgrayeconomicexchanges.Castells(1999:295)introducedtheconceptof
“spacesofflow”,suggesting,“materialarrangementsallowforsimultaneityofsocialpractices
withoutterritorialcontiguity”.Castells(2011:407)andothers(vanSluisetal.2012;Côté-
Boucher2015;vanSluis/Marks/Bekkers2011)usetheconceptofflowswithspecificreference
tothe“networksociety”,49whichischaracterizedbyincreasingfragmentationofindividuals
andcommunities,necessitatinginterdependentrelationshipsbetweenindividuals,public
services,thepolice,informationcommunicationtechnology(ITC)andmodesoftransport.
Accordingtothisview,people,money,goods,andinformationareincirculation,travelingto
andfromdifferentplaces,employingdifferentinfrastructuresandtherebygenerating
different“flows”whichconnect,collideormeetinnodes(vanSluisetal.2012:73).The
governanceofflowsandnodesprovidesacomplexconundrumtoregulatorswhileoffering
immediacy,connectednessandnewopportunitiesforeconomicactorsoperatinginlegal,gray
orillegalmarkets.
Inthecontextofthisdissertation,theideaofdynamicflowsinsteadofsupply,commodityor
tradechainsallowsflexibilitywithregardstotrajectories,influencesandcontingent
relationshipsthatmayevolve,developorperishbetweenactors,flowsandinstitutionsinthe
marketfield.Takeninaliteralsense,theconceptof‘flows’mayinvokedifferent
characteristics,suchasbifurcation(flowssplitbecauseofablockage,disruptionor
intervention),directionalityandinterdependence(whathappensupstreammayhavean
impactdownstream),theconfluenceoftributaries(flowsthatmerge),deadends(flowsthat
dryupordisappear),deltas(aflowsplitsintomyriadoffshoots),dryriverbedsthatflowagain
uponnewrains(re-joiningflows).Theideaofdifferentflowsformingconstitutiveelementsof
theaggregatemarketinrhinohornpresentsadynamicmodelthatintegratesmarket
processes,actors,socialnetworks,andinstitutionswhilealsocoveringspatial-temporal
considerations.Itwillbearguedthatillegal,grayandlegalflowsofrhinohorncannotbe
studiedinisolationbecausetheymerge,convergeanddiverge,impactedbyoneanotherand
byinstitutions,networksandcognitiveframesfoundinthemarketfield.Unliketherather
staticconceptofasingularsupplychain,theconceptof‘flows’allowsfordynamicand
49Castells(2000:5)suggeststhatthenetworksocietyisaspecificformofsocialstructureemblematicoftheInformationAge.
50
interdependentrelationships.
1.3.3Thenotionofcontestedillegalityanditsimpactontheemergenceandfunctioningofflows
Criminologists,anthropologistsandhumangeographershavecommentedontheblurred
boundariesbetweenthelegal/illegal,licit/illicitandlegitimate/illegitimatebinaries(seefor
example:Heyman/Smart1999;Heyman2013;Hall2013;VanSchendel/Abraham2005;Rose-
Greenland/Heatherington2014).Theblurringoftheinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegalityis
ofparticularinterestinthestudyoftransnationalflows.Forexample:whatislegalinone
placemaybeillegalelsewhere.Legalityorillegalitymayalsochangeovertime.Social,moral
andculturalnormsmaydivergefromlegalrules,thusdelegitimizingthem.
Mostscholarsrelyonthestateastheiranalyticalpointofdeparturewhenstudyingregulatory
frameworksandtheirimpact.Whilethestate50delineateswhatitconsidersaslegalorillegal,
theremaybeadisconnectbetweenthestateandsocietyregardingsuchlegaldefinitions,
theirinterpretation,andthelegitimacyofsuchrules.Both,agentsofthestateandmembers
ofsociety,mightfloutsomerules.Onceaneconomicexchangemovesbeyondthepolitical
boundariesofthestate(theexchangemayhappeninseveraldifferentstatesornoneatall–
invirtualmarketplaces),issuesofjurisdictionmuddythewaters.Moreover,theconstructed
andfixeddichotomiesoflegal/illegalorstate-approved/forbiddenignorehowillegal,informal
andgrayeconomicpracticesarefrequentlyintertwinedwithourdailylives(Van
Schendel/Abraham2005:4–6).
Thisdissertationcontributestothedebatebyintroducingtheconceptofcontestedillegality.
Whileaformalpoliticalauthoritymayhavecriminalized(declaredas“illegal”)anactatsome
pointintime,actorsin“illegal”andgrayflowsmaynotagreewiththelabel.Itwillbeargued
thatactors’implicitandexplicitdefianceorcontestationofthestate-sponsoredlabelof
illegalityserveasalegitimizingandenablingmechanism,whichfacilitatesparticipationingray
50Itisacknowledgedthatthestateisnotaunitaryactor.Forthepurposesofthisargument,thestateanddifferentarmsofgovernancearepresentedasahomogenousunit.
51
orillegalflows;occasionallyevenleadingtothecreationofnewgrayorillegalflows(seefor
exampleTaylor2015).Thefollowingsubsectionexpandsonimportantaspects.
Thestatedillegalityofaneconomicexchangemaybesubjecttonormativecontestationand
socialacceptance.Diverseculturalframesassignmoralandnormativemeaningstothe
legitimacyorillegitimacyofeconomicexchanges,thegoodsorservicestobeexchanged,the
actofproducingorexchangingthegoodsorservices,theactorconstellationsinvolvedinany
ofthestages/segmentsofthemarketexchangeortheimpactofthemarket(seefor
examples:Satz2010:91–114).Sociallegitimationofsomegoodsandservicesislikelyto
obtainadditionalchallenges:Whiletheproduction,exchangeorconsumption/useofsuch
goodsorservicesmayhavebeendeclaredtobe‘illegal’,thecommodificationofsuchgoods
orservicesmayalsobeconsideredmorallyorculturallycontested,questionableoreven
repugnant(Beckert2009).Importantactorsalongthesupplychainthushavetoovercome
moralscruples,culturalhurdlesorpersonalinhibitionsassociatedwithtransactinginsuch
illegalorgraymarkets(Beckert/Wehinger2013:7).However,actorsmayfinditlessdaunting
toenter,transactinorestablishmarkets,whichareillegalbutsociallyaccepted.Levelsof
socialacceptanceofthelawonthebooksmayvarybasedonnewinformation,emergentor
ancientculturalpreferencesortrendsorpolitico-legaldevelopments.51Wildlifecontraband
(especiallyrhinohorn)fallsintowhathasbeencalleda“contestedmarket”
(Steiner/Trespeuch2013)ora“contestedcommodity”(Radin1996)elsewhere.52Aswillbe
showninlaterchapters,therearecompetingclaimsastowhetherrhinohornshouldor
shouldnotbeatradablegoodorcommodity,callingintoquestionwhetherthelabelof
illegalityisappropriate,sufficient,orconstitutesacaseofethnocentricvaluation(valuation
thatisbasedonaparticularculturaloutlook).
51Thesmokingofcannabisderivativesasopposedtotheintravenoususeofopioidsubstances,forexample,issubjecttodifferentlevelsofsocietalsanctioning.Thedifferentialranking(progressivesectorsofsocietyaremoreforgivingwithregardstocannabisconsumption)isnotonlylinkedtotheseriousnessoftheoffencebutextendstomoraljudgmentasregardsthebroaderimpactonsociety,thelevelofsocialandotherharmsexperiencedbytheindividual(theoffender)andtheirsocialenvironment.52SteinerandTrespeuch(2013:144)define“contestedmarkets”as“marketsinwhichcontestedcommoditiesareboughtandsold”.TheauthorsbuildonRadin’sconceptionofcontestedcommodities,whicharegoodsthatmaybeopentomoralchallenges.
52
Theprocessofsociallegitimationfortheeconomicexchangeofgoodsandservicesisnotonly
significanttotheemergenceofillegalmarkets;actorsencountersimilardifficultiesinthelegal
field(forexample:organs,sexwork,andgeneticallymodifiedorganisms).Thedifficultyof
transcendingsocietaltaboo’sinestablishingneweconomicventureshasbeenshownin
empiricalstudiesofthelifeinsuranceindustryinnineteenth-centuryAmerica(Zelizer1979;
Zelizer[1978]1992),marketsforadoptingchildren(Zelizer[1985]1994),organsandbody
tissue(Healy2006;Scheper-Hughes/Wacquant2002;Steiner2003/5)andwhalewatching
(Lawrence/Phillips2004).Moralscrupleslinkedtoreligious,culturalorsocietalvalueshadto
bebridgedbeforestablemarketexchangescouldemerge.Regulatorydeterminationsasto
thelegalstatusofagoodorservicemaydifferacrossjurisdictionsandtimedistantiations,
offeringmoralwindfallstoactors.
Thecorollaryisalsotrue:Theeconomicexchangeforcertaingoods–suchaswildlifeproducts
–waslegalandlegitimateuntilregulatorsdeclaredotherwise.Ideally,theregulationofa
formerlylegalactivityorproductshouldinvolveaprotractedprocessofpublicconsultation
withaffectedconstituents,negotiation,drafting,andimplementation.Illegalizationperse
presentsasocio-politicalprocessratherthanastaticcondition,likelytoleadtosocialand
culturalbiasesthattendtofavourthepreferencesoftherule-makers(Heyman2013:304).It
isimportanttonotethesignificantroleofthestate,regulatoryauthoritiesandlaw
enforcementagenciesindetermininglegalrulesandnormsaboutthelegalityorillegalityof
economicexchange.Theinfluenceofprofessionalknowledge,scientificinsights,and
disciplinaryregimesislikewisenottobediscountedintheprocessoflegalizationor
illegalization(Heyman2013:306).Afurtherdimensionrelatestothesponsorsoflegalrules
andnorms,whomaybeeconomicelitesorcorporationsseekingtoprotecttheireconomic
interests.Moreover,thehistoryof“overrulethateithersuspendedlegalitiesordeployed
themtoauthorizepredationandcriminalizeopposition”hasledthepoorandmarginalized
strataofpostcolonialsocietyinsouthernAfricatocontinuetodistrustthestateandits
perceivedanti-poorpoliciesby(Comaroff/Comaroff2006:11).Thefollowingobservationis
insightfulinthisregard:
“Asprivatizationandenclosurecreatenewformsofproperty,theysimultaneouslydefinenewformsoftheft,frompiracyandpoachingtocloningandhacking.Such
53
practicesarenotalwaysdeemedillegitimateacrosssocialandnationaldivides.”(Comaroff/Comaroff2006:11)
Ofsignificancetothisdissertationisthusanotheranalyticalissueconcerningtheillegalstatus
ofaneconomicexchange:Whathappenswhentheeconomicexchangeofagoodisdeclared
illegalataspecificpointintime,outlawingorbanninganexchangethatwaslegaland
legitimateupuntiltheprohibitiontakeseffect?Putdifferently:Howdoesthesociallegitimacy
orillegitimacyofabanaffecttheemergenceandfunctioningofanillegalmarket?Moreover,
prohibitiononlyappliestoonestageorsegmentoftheeconomicexchangeinsomeeconomic
exchanges.Achangedlegalstatusofagoodfurtherdownstreamorupstreammaybe
unknowntomarketactors(Beckert/Wehinger2013:10).Afurtherquestioniswhathappens
inscenarioswhereinternationalactors(suchasamulti-lateraltreatyorganization)imposea
banthatlackslegitimacyatthelocallevel.Thepoachingofendangeredwildlife,forexample,
isillegalinso-calledrangecountries,53whereastradehoversinagrayzonebetweenlegality
andillegality,andconsumptionissociallylegitimateinconsumercountries.Noteworthyisthe
partialbanonthetradeinrhinohorn;thesaleofliverhinosandtrophyhuntingofwhite
rhinosisallowedinafewjurisdictionswhileafulltradebanapplieselsewhere.Pre-
Convention54processedivoryistradedlegallyinmanyjurisdictionswhereasnocommercial
tradeofpost-ConventionrawivoryisallowedinCITESmemberstates.
Thenotionof‘contestedillegality’isintroducedinthisdissertationtocapturealegitimation
strategyemployedbyimportantactorstojustifytheirparticipationinillegalorgrayflowsof
rhinohorn.Suchactorsmightnotacceptthelawonthebooksforavarietyofreasons
includingtheperceivedunfairnessoftheban,divergentsocialorculturalnormsthatclash
withtheban,ortheymightnotacceptthelawforpolitico-historicalreasons.Contestationof
thelawonthebooksmaybelinkedtoissuesofagency.Whoaretherule-makers?Were
importantandaffectedconstituenciesconsultedbeforetheenactmentoftheban?Howisthe
banimplemented?Divergentviewsregardingthelegitimacyofaprohibition-basedsystemare
likelytoinfluencethefunctioningofillegalmarkets.Itwillbearguedthatthemechanismof
53Rangecountiesrefertocountrieswherespecificpopulationsofwildlifeoccurinthe‘wild’.SouthAfrica,Namibia,Kenya,SwazilandandZimbabwearekeyAfricanrhinorangestates.54CITEScameintoforcein1977.AnywildlifeproductsthatpredatedtheenactmentofCITEScanbetradedinmostCITESmembersstatesprovidedthatprovenancecanbeshown.
54
contestedillegalityiscloselylinkedtothevaluationofthebannedgoodorservice.The
coordinationproblemofvaluationisunpackedinthenextsubsection;sufficetomentionhere
thatvaluationofrhinohornasasacralgoodorasamiraclecureislikelytooverrideconcerns
regardingthelegalstatusandprovenanceofrhinohorn.Theothercoordinationproblems
consideredinthisdissertation–competition,cooperation,andsecurity–arealsoinfluenced
bycontestedillegality.Theserelationshipswillbefurtherunpackedintherelevant
subsections.
Followingthetrajectoryoftheargument,actorsmaycontesttheillegalstatusofthegood–
rhinohorn–duetodifferentculturalmeanings,politicaljurisdictionswithconflictingornon-
existentregulationsaboutitslegalstatus,spatial-temporalconsiderationsandothersocial
mechanisms.Thisdissertationwillshowthatimportantactorsrefusetoaccepttheillegalityof
therhinohornexchangebasedontheirvaluationofrhinosandrhinohorn.Insteadofbridging
moralscrupleslinkedtotheillegalityofthetradeinrhinohorn,theseactorsdefythebanand
legitimizetheirtransgressionsthroughtheirvaluationofrhinosandrhinohorn.The
legitimizingmechanismofcontestedillegalitythusfacilitatestheflowofrhinohornfromthe
sourcetothemarket.Chapter5ontheinternationalregulatorysystemhighlightshistorical,
conceptualandpoliticalissuesthatimpactthelegitimacyoftheban.Subsequentchapters
explainhowthetradebanisintertwinedwithlanduseandhuntingrightsoflocal
communitieslivinginorclosetoconservationareas.
1.3.4Resolvingcoordinationproblemsinillegalmarkets
Tostudytheoperationandstructureofillegalmarketssystematically,Beckertand
Wehinger(2013:12)proposetheuseofthetypologyofcoordinationproblems.Thepointof
departureliesintherecognitionthatformarketstooperate“uncertaintyinmarket
transactionsmustbereducedinseveraldimensions”(Beckert/Wehinger2013:12).
Uncertaintyinmarketsstemsfromthethreecoordinationproblemsconcerningvalue,
competition,andcooperation.Actorsinillegalmarketsarelikelytobeconfrontedwith
coordinationproblemssimilartothoseoflegalmarkets,subjecttoadditionalchallengesdue
totheillegalityofthemarketexchanges(Beckert/Wehinger2011:7).WhileBeckertand
55
Wehinger(ibid)arguethatmarketactorsrequire“stableworlds”(Fligsteincitedin:Beckert
2007:23)andcalculabilitytoreproducelegalandillegalmarkets,thisdissertationargues
againstthenotionofstabilityinillegalmarkets.Reuter(1983)introducedthenotionof
‘disorganizedcrime’,suggestingthesupplyofillegalcommoditiestakesplaceina
disorganizedmannerduetotheconstraintimposedbyillegalityandthelackoflarge-scale
criminalenterprisesinillegalmarkets(Paoli2002:52).Marketactorsmayseektoreduce
uncertaintyinillegalmarkets;however,theymightnotbeseeking‘stableworlds’asstability
andpredictabilityconstituteoperationalweaknesses,whichcouldbeexploitedbyregulators
(especiallylawenforcementagencies)whoseektodisruptillegalmarkets.Thecoordination
problemsofvalue,competitionandcooperationareunpackedinthefollowingsections.An
additionalcoordinationproblem–theproblemofsecurity–isintroduced.
a) ThecoordinationproblemofvalueTheproblemofvaluerefersto“theassignmentofvaluetoacertaincategoryofgoods(for
instance,cars,wine,travel)andsecond,totheassignmentofdifferentvaluesto
heterogeneousproductswithinthesamemarket”(Beckert2011b:764).Duringtheprocessof
valuation,productsarerankedaccordingtofunctionalityorstatustheybestowuponthe
consumer.Whileactorsinlegalmarketsmayhaveaccesstomarketing,advertisingresources,
andproductreviews,thesuppliers’roleinpreferenceformationandtheconsumer’saccess
regardingproductqualitymaybelimitedinillegalmarkets(Beckert/Wehinger2013:12).
However,thereputationoftraders,‘wordofmouth’referralsandproductreviewsinonline
market-placeslikethenowdefunctSilkRoad55mayassistmarketactorsonbothendsofthe
supplychaininmakinginformedchoices.Thisdissertationwillshowthatconsumershave
developedinnovativestrategiestoensureprovenanceandqualitycontrolinillegalrhinohorn
markets.
55SilkRoadgainednotorietyasanon–lineglobalmarket–placeforsellingmostlydrugsandrelatedparaphernalia.Operationalsince2011andeffectivelyshutdownin2014,userscouldbuydrugswiththeInternet-basedcurrencyBitcoin.Crowdsourcingtechniqueswereusedtovetbestsellersandidentifyscammers.Consumersavoidedstreet-basedtransactionswiththeassociatedrisksofviolenceandpossiblygetting“rippedoff”.Theyalsocoulddoqualitychecksandpricecomparisons(SilkRoadDrugs2014).Similarsiteshavesprungupsincethemuch-publicizedarrestoftheallegedmastermindofSilkRoadinFebruary2014.
56
Rhinohornfallsintothecategoryofillegalwildlifeproducts.Ithasbothfunctionaland
investmentvalueinthatitisusedintraditionalmedicines,andstatusisattributedtothose
abletoaffordit.Interestingly,AsianrhinohornisvaluedhigherthanthehornofAfrican
species,andevenfakerhinohornisattributedwithvalue.Cognitiveframesplayanimportant
roleintheprocessofvaluationastheyenablethementalorganizationofthesocial
environment.Socialnormsandrulesformpartofsociallyinscribedmeaningstructures
operatinginamarketfieldthroughwhichthevariousactorsassesssituationsanddefinetheir
responses(Beckert2010:9).Thisdissertationexaminessocial,culturalandnormativebeliefs
astheyrelatetotherelationshipbetweenhumansandnature.Withitsprehistoricfeatures
reminiscentofmammothsandothercreatureslonggone,therhinohasbeencomparedto
mysticalimagessuchastheunicorn–(forexample:Unicornsarereal2009)andpopular
memesonsocialmediaplatformsoftherhinoasa“unicornwithcurves”.Actorsalongthe
supplychainassigndifferentphysical(physicalperformanceofagood)andsymbolicvalues
(consistsofimaginativevaluethatactorsascribetoanobjectandpositionalvalueascribedto
anobject,positioningtheownerinthesocialspace)torhinohorn(Beckert2011a).Poachers,
wildlifeprofessionals,conservators,environmentalactivistsandconsumersattachdifferent
cognitivemeaningstotherhinoasawildbeastanditsproduct,therhinohorn.Itwillbe
arguedthatthesecognitiveframesandassociatedmeaningsaresteepedinculturalframes
aboutthehuman-naturenexus.Canthehighpriceofrhinohornbeexplainedinreferenceto
culturalframes?Istheprocessofvaluationaccompaniedbyprocessofsacralization56ofrhino
horn?Inotherwords,haveculturalframesledtothevaluationofrhinohornasasacredor
magicalgood?Zelizerdistinguishesbetween“profane”,“magical”and“sacred”moneyinher
researchonthelifeinsuranceindustryin19thcenturyAmerica(Zelizer[1978]1992:291-
293).InborrowingfromZelizer,profanevaluationreferstothevaluationofgoodsasworldly,
whilesacredvaluationreferstotranscendentalcommunitynorms.Ofimportanceisthusa
cleardelineationofthedifferentfactorsthatbearonthevaluationofrhinohorn,the
instrumentalityofrhinohorn(whatisitusedfor)andhowdifferentactorsvaluerhinohornat
56Sacralizationreferstoaprocessduringwhich“valueshapes[the]price,investingitwithsocial,religiousorsentimentalmeaning”(Zelizer[1985]1994:21).
57
differentstagesofthevaluechain.Moreover,Ishallinvestigatewhetherrhinohornhas
becomeacommodityofconspicuousconsumption.57
Afurtherconsiderationpertainstothenotionofcontestedillegality.Aspertheearlier
section,itwillbearguedthatthevaluationofrhinohorniscloselylinkedtothelegitimization
deviceofcontestedillegality.Thevaluationofrhinohorntrumpsitsillegalstatusacross
importantactorgroups,facilitatingitsflowfromsourcetomarket.
b) Thecoordinationproblemofcompetition
Thesecondcoordinationproblemrelatestotheissueofcompetition.Itisintheinterestof
producersandsupplierstosetupmarketstructuresthatprovideprotectionagainst
competitivepricingastoascertainviableprofitmargins.Producers,intermediariesandthe
statecompeteforpositionsintheformaleconomy,whichmayresultincartelization,
monopolization,productdifferentiation,innovation,first-moveradvantages,barrierstoentry
andlegalregulationsthatdeterminetherulesofengagement(Beckert/Wehinger2013:14).
Whilethestateprovidessomegroundrulesintheformaleconomy,illegalmarketactors
regulatecompetitiontovaryingdegreesthemselves.
Scholarshavelinkedtheself-regulationofcompetitioninillegalmarketstotheuseorthreat
ofviolentmeansofpersuasionandcorruption(corruptionisdiscussedinmoredetailbelow).
Theearlierdiscussionofthedifferentmodelsoforganizedcrimemadereferencetotheuseor
threatofviolencebysomecriminalentitiesinabidtoenforcecontractualobligationsinillegal
markets.Reuter(2009:275)arguesthatviolencemaybeafeatureofsomeillegalmarkets
duetothefollowingcharacteristicstypicalofillegaleconomicexchanges:
“Themarketsforillegalgoodsandservicesoperatewithouttheusualprotectionsagainstfraudandviolenceofferedbythecourtsystem.Thestateinsteadofattemptingtofacilitatetransactions,aimstodisruptthem.Contractscannotbeenforcedthroughwrittendocumentsandthelegalsystem;agreementsaremade
57Inhisthesisonthe“leisureclass”,Veblen(1899)arguedthatwealthyindividualsoftenconsumehighlyconspicuousgoodsandservicesinordertoshowcasetheirwealth,therebyachievinggreatersocialstatus.
58
hurriedly,sometimesinambiguouscode,andorally.Territoriescannotbeallocatedthroughbiddingfordesirablelocations,sincethereisnoenforceableownershipofpropertyforthesepurposes.”
Whilesomeofthementionedcharacteristicsdealwithcontractenforcement,thepower
vacuumandopportunitiesforviolenceduetheabsenceofan“independent”arbitrator58in
illegalmarkets,others(suchasterritorialdisputes)dealimplicitlywithmattersof
competition.Drugmarketsareoftenregardedassteepedinviolence,furtherexacerbatedby
the“WaronDrugs”rhetoricandviolentmeasuresusedtodisruptsuchmarkets.Scholarly
research(Reuter2009;Reuter/Haaga1989)hashowevershownthatdrugmarketsare
surprisinglypeaceful.Severalsourcesmaygenerateviolenceinspecificdrugmarkets,suchas
intra-organizationalissues(successionplanningordisciplinaryaction),inter-organizational
issues(territorialortransactional)andconflictbetweenillegaldrugmarketactorsandthe
stateoritsrepresentatives(Reuter2009:275).ReuterandPollack(2012)showthatthetravel
distancesofsellersandbuyershaveimplicationsforviolenceondrugmarkets.Import
marketsconsistingoflocalbuyersandforeignsellersdisplayedthehighestlevelsofviolence,
suggestingthatsocialtiesbetweenbuyersandsellersmayreducethereadinesstouse
violence.Gambetta(1996:1-2)referstotheSicilianmafia’stradeinprotectionservices.To
him,themafia’sprovisionofprotectionentailsaninsurancepolicyduringeconomic
exchanges,whichfunctionsas“apoorandcostlysubstituteoftrust”(Gambetta1996:2).
AccordingtoPaoli(2002:64-65),illegalentrepreneurswillresorttofraudandviolencetoget
whatevertheycanand“resorttopeacefuldickeringonlywheretheyareconfrontedwitha
powerequaltotheirownorwheretheyregarditasshrewdtodosoforthesakeoffuture
exchangeopportunities”.Thescholarsrelyontheartificialdivisionof‘underworld’and
‘upperworld’typicaloftheorganizedcrimediscourse,allowinglimitedscopeforthenefarious
activitiesoflegalactors.Reuter(1983:187),ontheotherhand,postulatesthatthe“magicof
themarketplace”resolvesthedistributionofillegalgoodsandservicesinillegalmarkets,with
the“visiblehand”ofviolenceandcorruptionoftengettingtrouncedbymarketeconomics.
Afirstglanceattheillegalrhinohornmarketappearstosuggestthatcriminalactorsexudea
propensityforviolentmeansofexecution,whichmayalsoincludefendingoffpotential
58Itisacknowledgedthatregulatorsmaytweakregulationstosuittheinterestsofthestateanditsnon-statepartners.
59
competitors.Theactofharvestingrhinohornillegally59–thepoachingofaliverhino–isa
violentactperse,involvingthewilfulkillingofawildanimal.Thequestionarisinghereis
whetherviolenceisreproducedalongtheflow.Howdopoachers,kingpins,wildlife
professionalsandothersdealwithcompetition?Doesrhinopoachingleadtofurtheractsor
threatsofviolencebetweenillegalmarketactors?Afurtherconsiderationpertainstothe
dwindlingnumbersofrhinos.Ifcompetitionisfoundtobe“peaceful”(asperWeber’s
definitionofcompetition)inthecurrentclimate,whatistheoutlookasrhinonumbersgrow
less?Thedecreasingrhinonumbersmaynotonlyleadtoconflictatthesource(withpoachers
possiblyfightingoneanotheroverthelastrhinos)butalsocompetitivepricingstructuresin
consumermarkets.
Marketactorsmayalsorelyoncorruptionorcollusionwithrepresentativesofthestateto
‘takeout’thecompetition.Inthisinstance,criminalactorsmayworkinconcertwithcorrupt
stateagenciesorindividualagentsofthestate.Thestate“isnolongerabletoimplementlaw
becausestateofficials(theagents)makelawenforcementitselfatradablecommodity”
(Beckert/Wehinger2013:15).Thepracticeofcorruptioninillegalmarketsisnotrelegatedto
unlawfulrelationshipsbetweencriminalactorsandagentsofthestateonly.Itcanalsoinvolve
actorsfromtheformaleconomy,suchasbusinesspeople,representativesofmultinational
corporationsandfromthemilitary-industrialcomplex.Corruptrelationshipsmayreduce
uncertaintyinillegalmarketsbyloweringtheprospectsofeffectivelawenforcementand
criminalprosecution(Dewey2012).Contestedillegalityinthisinstancemayfacilitatethe
participationofagentsofthestateinillegalmarkets.Ifprohibitionweretolacklegitimacyand
henceacceptanceamongstsuchactors,thentheremightbelessmoralscruplestoparticipate
inillegalmarkettransactions.Corruptionofstateagentsandcollusionwithindustry
professionalsplaysasignificantrolealongtherhinohornsupplychain.Suchstrategiesare
employedatseveralnodesfromthepointoforiginthroughtothefinaldestinationofthe
rhinohorn.Aswillbeshowninlaterchapters,targetedorconditionallawenforcementplays
ansignificantrolein‘takingoutthecompetition’.
59Whilecriminalactorscanemploynon-lethalmeansofhornremoval(suchasthedartingofrhinos),theharvestingofhornusuallyinvolvesthekillingoftherhino.
60
Inlookingatthecareeradvancementofacelebrateddrugsmuggler‘MrNice’,Morselli(2001:
228)foundthatBurt’sstructuralholeargument60offeredanuancedalternativetoframing
competitionofcriminalentrepreneurs:
“Structuringone’spersonalworkingnetworktoincludetradememberswhoarenotdirectlyconnectedtoeachotherbutwhomayhaveinterestsindealingwithoneanotherrepresentsacooperativewayofbeingcompetitive.Thecombinationofreputation,know-how,consistentandquickaccesstoprivilegedinformationsources,andnon-redundantpersonalnetworkinggivesaplayerthecompetitiveedgeneededforfurtheradvancement.”
Themaintenanceofsocialtiesthatstretchbeyondone’ssocialgroup(heterogeneoussocial
networks),soMorselliargues,maythusprovideacompetitiveadvantagetocriminalplayers.
Theroleoftheintermediaryandtheiraccesstoprivilegedinformationisofinteresthere.
Gambetta(1996)showstheimportanceofintermediariesinhisanalysisoftheSicilianmafia.
Whilemafiosisellguarantees,patrons(intermediaries)sellinformation.Inthiscontext,the
roleoftheintermediaryisasfollows(Gambetta1996:18):
“Theyprovideintroductions,recommendations,adviceaboutcompetitionforpubliccontracts,thenamesofkeypeopletoapproach;theybacknewlegislationorapplicationforjobsandbenefits;theytranslateclientdemandsintoappropriatelanguage,simplifyrules,andidentifymeansofavoidingsanctionsandobtainingfavours.”
Itwillbearguedthatintermediariesplayafacilitatingrolebetweensourceandmarket.61They
arenotonlyimportanttransmittersofinformation,buttheyareoftenpeopleofsocialranking
thatinspiretrustworthinesstoactorsfurtherdownstreamandupstreamthesupplychain.
60AccordingtoBurt(1992:17-18)negotiatingearlyaccess,timingandreferralstoinformationmayprovideacompetitiveadvantagetosavvyactors.Suchactorscultivatetheirbusinesscontactsprudentlyinordertoseize“structuralholes”.Burtdifferentiatesbetweenredundantandnon-redundantcontacts.Thenumberofnon-redundantcontactsiscrucialasthesemightleadtoprivilegedinformation.Redundantcontactsfailtoprovidethecompetitiveedgeastheyleadtothesamepeopleandhencethesamepoolofinformationavailabletoothers.“Structuralholes”referto“theseparationbetweennon-redundantcontacts”(Burt1992:18).Byoccupyingastructuralhole,actorsareinapositiontobrokeradealwithpreviouslyunconnectedplayers.61Intermediariesaresignificanttoresolvingtheothercoordinationproblemstooduetotheircentralroleinsupplychains.Theyprovidealinkagebetweenactorsfurtherupstreamanddownstreamthesupplychainandtherebyplayanactiveroleinvaluationandcooperation,aswellassecurityofillegalmarketstructures.
61
Intermediariesmaywellhaveseizedstructuralholesinnegotiatingtheirroleinillegaland
grayflows,andaswillbearguedlater,inlegalflows.Assuggestedintheliterature,itwould
appearaxiomaticthatactorsfromthelegalsectorcommandacompetitiveadvantagein
negotiatingtheflowofillegalgoodswherealegalparallelmarketexists.Suchactorswouldbe
apprisedofregulatoryloopholesandthetricksofthetrade.Theyalsohaveintimate
knowledgeofsupplyanddistributiondynamicsalonglegalgoodsflowsandtheavailablepool
oftradepartners.Actorswithheterogeneoussocialnetworks,experienceinlegalflowsand
adaptability(theabilitytoreactswiftlytonewimpulses)aresignificantarbitratorsand
facilitatorsofillegalflowswithacoordinatingrolethatmayaffectcooperation,competition,
valuation,andsecurity.
Afurtherconsiderationrelatestolimitedcompetitionwhenitcomestodeterminingor
acceptingthepricingofgoodsonillegalmarkets.Itbecomesincreasinglydifficultto
determine“theprice/qualitynexus”asgoodsmovealongthevaluechainfromproducerto
consumers.Suppliersandcustomershaveimperfectinformationaboutbothqualityand
pricesofgoods,which“distortscompetition”(Beckert/Wehinger2013:16).Whilethe
demandforrhinohornhasancientculturalroots,onecannotautomaticallyassumethatthe
marketispurelydemand-driven.Duetotheriskassociatedwiththeprocurementand
transportationofrhinohorn,hornproducersandintermediariesmaybeabletoleveragethe
priceofthehorn.Afurthertrainofthoughtpertainstothehighincidenceoffakesenteringat
variousstagesofthesupplychain.Doillegalmarketactorsconsiderfakerhinohornproducers
andtradersascompetition?Whatimpacthasthefakerhinohornmarketondemandand
qualitycontrol?
c)ThecoordinationproblemofcooperationActorsalsohavetofacethecoordinationproblemofcooperation.Thepossibilityofabreach
ofcontractornon–performanceconstitutesarisktoanyeconomicexchange.Inillegal
markets,theserisksarisefrom“asymmetricdistributionofinformationregardingtheprice,
productqualityandthepossibleopportunismofexchangepartnersinlightofincompleteor
non–enforceablecontracts”(Beckert/Wehinger2013:17).
62
PortesandHalleridentifythe“paradoxofembeddedness”intheiranalysisofinformal
economies.Intheabsenceofstateregulationininformaleconomies,thereareopportunities
“forviolationsofnormativeexpectationsandwidespreadfraud”(Portes/Haller2005:406).
Theparadoxliesinthecontentionthatthemoretheinformaleconomyapproachestheideal
ofanunfetteredmarketexchange,“themoreitisdependentonsocialtiesforitseffective
functioning”(Portes/Haller2005:407).Thesignificanceofsocialembeddednessisparticularly
clearintransactions“wheretheonlyrecourseagainstmalfeasanceismutualtrustbyvirtueof
commonmembershipinsomeoverarchingsocialstructure”.Membershipofthesamesocial
networkorsharedsocial/culturalidentitiescombinedwiththecertaintythatwrongdoerswill
bepenalizedorexcludedfromfuturetransactionsbolstersandsustainstrust(Portes2010:
136-137).Gambetta’sdefinitionoftrustisusefulinthisinstance.Gambetta(1988a:217)
definestrustas“aparticularlevelofthesubjectiveprobabilitywithwhichanagentassesses
thatanotheragentorgroupofagentswillperformaparticularaction,bothbeforehecan
monitorsuchaction(orindependentlyofhiscapacityevertobeabletomonitorit)andina
contextinwhichitaffectshisownaction.”
PortesandHalleralludetosignificantdifferencesbetweeninformalandillegalbusiness
practices.62Illegalityrobsactorsoflegalprotectionofpropertyrightsusuallyprovidedbythe
stateforlegalmarkettransactionsandlimitsthebusinessstrategiesandorganizationalforms
availabletoactors(Beckert/Wehinger2011:1).Thestatedoesnotenforcecontractsinillegal
markets;actorsthushavetorelyondifferentenforcementstrategies,suchastheuseor
threatofviolence(Portes/Haller2005).Despitetheabsenceofthestate,PortesandHaller
arguethatactorsinlegalandillegalmarketssharesimilarsystemsofenforcementand
redress.Theenforcementofcontractsorremovalofcompetitorscanbeoutsourcedto
protectionbrackets(Beckert/Wehinger2013:15).IntheAfricancontext,thetradeingems,
gold,ivoryandotherhigh-valueexportproductsisoftenhighlyorganized.Majorexporters
needtobeassociatesormembersoforganizationsthatareeither“quasi-political”or“quasi-
62BeckertandWehinger(2013:11)arguethattherearedifferentresearchfociinstudiesofinformalandillegalmarkets.Conceptually,studiesontheinformaleconomyfocusonhowpoorpeopleekeoutalivingbeyondstateregulation;meanwhile,researchintoillegalmarketslooksintomarketstructuresandcoordinationproblemsbeyondtherealmoflawfulness.
63
criminal”innatureastheexploitationofsuchresourcesrequires“theexerciseorthreatof
physicalforce”(Ellis/MacGaffey1996:36).63
However,notallactorsinillegalmarketsarepronetouseviolencetoenforcecontracts.
Violentbehaviourorthethreatofviolenceislikelytoobtainattentionfromunwanted
spectators,suchaslawenforcementagenciesorthemedia.Unlesstheseactorsareactively
seekingoutattentiontopropeltheirbusinessinterestsortogainareputationfora
propensityforviolence,theyarelikelytoforegounwantedattention.Therelianceupon
relationshipsbasedontrustoreconomicexchangessecuredthroughcorrupttransactions
constitutesanalternativestrategytoenforcecontracts,andmayalsocircumventdetection
fromlawenforcement(seetheprevioussubsection).Moreover,thelegitimizationdeviceof
contestedillegalitymayswayactorstocooperateinillegalmarkets.
Granovetter(1985:481-482)introducesthenotionof“honouramongstthieves”inacase
studyofembezzlementinthebusinesscommunity.Hearguesthatmalfeasancenotbe
possiblewithoutpriorexistingrelationshipsoftrust.Gambetta(1988a)showshoweverthat
trustmaygrowasaresultofcooperationratherthanasapreconditionofcooperation
(comparewiththesectiononsecurity).BeckertandWehinger(2013)arguethatwhileformal
institutions,socialnetworks,andcognitiveframesarenecessaryforthestabilizationof
marketexchangesintheformalsector,illegalmarketsarelikelytorelymoreheavilyon
personalnetworksandtrusttosolvecoordinationproblems.Personalizednetworksbasedon
therightcombinationofarm’slengthandembeddedties(comparewiththenotionof
‘integratednetworks’inUzzi1997)andreputationbasedonsocialkinshiparelikelytofeature
prominently.Whilesomeactorsuseviolenceorthethreatofviolencetoenforcecontractsin
illegalmarkets,othersemploycorruptiontosecureillegalmarkettransactions.The
trustworthinessofnewbusinesspartnersmightalsogettested(Gambetta2009).
Adiverseassortmentofactorswithpotentiallydeepcleavages–stretchingfromdifferent
languages,nationalities,culturalbackgrounds,socialstratatoethnicity–isinvolvedinillegal
andgrayflowsofrhinohorn.Beyondbridgingsocial,culturalandotherdifferenceslocally,
63LiberianwarlordCharlesTaylor,formerUNITArebelcommanderJonasSavimbiandbrokersonbehalfoftheapartheidregimeinSouthAfrica,Mugabe’sregimeinZimbabweandRENAMOnegotiatedimport-exportdeals,whichwereprotectedbythemightofthesword.
64
theseactorsalsohavetoestablishandmaintainrelationshipswithoverseastradingpartners
insuboptimalconditions.Howisthisachieved?Moreover,whatistheroleofintermediaries
(seetheprevioussection)?Thisdiversecollectionofactors,theirpersonalizednetworks,and
mechanismsemployedtoevadedetectionfromlawenforcementshouldgleaninteresting
insightsonhowillegalmarketsarestructuredandoperateunderprecariousconditions.
(d) Thecoordinationproblemofsecurity
Theproduction,distributionandconsumptionofgoodsandservicestradedinillegalmarkets
leadtoanothercoordinationproblem,theproblemofsecurity.Securityinthisinstance
constitutesamulti-dimensionalproblemwithimplicationsforthepersonalsecurityofmarket
actors,securityofthesupplychainandtheillegalgoodsorservicestradedinillegalmarkets
andthepotentialadditionofasecuritypremiumaddedtothecostofillegalgoods.Security
measuresandprotection(seesubsectiononcompetition)canbeprocuredlocallybuthowdo
actorsensurethesecurityofthesupplychain,thesafetransferofillegalgoodsfromsourceto
marketandpaymentforthegoodsandtransfercosts?
Thecoordinationproblemofsecurityproposedhereisqualitativelydifferentfromthe
problemofcooperation.Infact,illegalmarketactorshavetostrikeacarefulbalancebetween
cooperationontheonehand,andsecurityontheother.Whilecooperationmayentail
partnershipsandresourcesharing,securitymaycurtailcooperativeeffortsinfavourof
secrecyandconcealment(Morselli2008:63).KenHawkeyeGross(1992:coverpage)pointsto
thedilemmathatactorsfacebysurmising,“…mistakescancostnotjustdollarsandmarket
share,butyearsofone’slife”.CentraltowhatMorsellietal.(2007:145)describeasthe
“efficiency-securitytradeoff”iswhethercriminalnetworkactorscanrelyexclusivelyon
trustingrelationshipsorwhethertheyhavetoengageinuncertainandpotentiallyrisky
relationships.Reducingriskandtherebyincreasingsecurityleadstoasacrificeintermsof
timeandefficiency,as“eachoperationandthetransmissionofinformationtakelongerto
65
processacrossthenetwork”(ibid).Inreferencetotransactioncosttheory,64Basu(2014:4)
proposesthatduetoregulatoryattemptstodisruptillicittradechains,actorshavetofactorin
“directorindirectcostsofexchange(concealment,corruption,evasion),aswellasbe
preparedtowriteoffacertainpercentageoftheirprofitsduetocircumstancesinvolving
contrabandshipmentsbeingseizedbycustomsorpolice”.Thequestionarisinghereis
whetherthesuggestedsecuritypremiumleadstoanescalationoftheoverallpriceofan
illegalgoodorwhetheractorscanconceiveofinnovativemechanismsthatincreaseboth
efficiencyandsecurityoftheillegalsupplychain.Theillegalandtransnationalstatusofgoods
mayperhapsleadtocostsavingselsewhere,suchastaxandtariffsavoidanceorastructural
adaptationofthesupplychain(e.g.fewersegmentsorshortermoredirectroutes).Afurther
considerationrelatestowhetherallmarketactorsareequallyaffectedbysecurity
considerationsandprecautions.Arecertainflowsorsegmentsofthesupplychainmoreprone
todangerthanothers?Howdosecurityconsiderationsaffecttheflowofgoods?
Theissueofincompleteinformationisalsoofimportancehere.Thenotionofbounded
rationality65isonlypartiallyusefulinassessinghowillegalmarketactorsmightdealwith
assessingsecurityrisksinlightofincompleteinformationavailabletothem,andwhetherthey
encounteranincompleteinformation/securitydilemma.Infollowingthetrajectoryofthe
boundedrationalityargument,theremaybeamismatchbetweenthedecision-making
environment(themarketexchangeisdeemedillegal)andthedecisionmaker’schoice(Jones,
B.D.1999:298).Theimplicitgoal-orientedrationalchoiceapproach(formoredetailssee:
Beckert2003;Dewey2014b)provideslimitedinsightsastohowillegalmarketactors
undertakesecurityassessments,howculturalframesandsocialembeddednessmayinfluence
choices.Thesocialembeddednessofillegalmarketsactors,forexample,mayprovide
operationalinformationabouttheirimmediateenvironmentandtheirsocialnetwork.Howis
64Transactioncostsrelatetothecostsofparticipatinginamarket.Williamson(1989)arguedthatfrequencyoftheexchange,specificity,uncertainty,limitedrationalityandopportunisticbehaviouraredeterminantsofsuchcosts.
65Accordingtothenotionofboundedrationality(Simon1972),thepoolofavailableinformation,theactor’scognitivelimitationsandtimeavailabletotakeadecisionmightexplainan‘irrational’decisionthatdoesnotoptimizeutility(profit).
66
informationaboutactorsandtransactionsupstreamanddownstreamattained?Dothe
goalpostschangeastheproducttravelswiththeflow?Howdoactorsensurepayments?
Insociologicalresearchoncross-bordertradeinMedievalEurope,Quack(2009)foundthat
theprovisionofsecuritywasaprerequisiteforsuchtradetoemerge.Merchantsjoinedin
tradingcommunities.Theseself-regulatoryassociativeorderscontrolledexclusivetrading
rightsintheirhomebaseandprovidedprotection,informationsharingandsocialbonding.
Theemergenceofaninterregionalfinancialcircuit,maritimeinsuranceandearlyformsof
transferpricing,overdraftfacilitiesandcreditnotesfurthereasedtransnationaltrade.Cross-
borderlawandregulatoryenforcementwereequallyimportant,includingtheextra-
jurisdictionalexpansionofdomesticlaw,theemergenceofspecificlocallawsintradehubs
andthesigningofinter-cityagreementsallowingformutualjurisdictioninconflictresolution
(Quack2009:135–136).Africanmigranttradingcommunitieshadcrossedhugeregionsof
Africaonhorseback,donkeyorcamelbeforepoliticalborderlinesdrawnbycolonialrulers
dividedtribes,communitiesandclans.Allianceswereforgedbetweenlocalentrepreneursand
foreignmerchantsduringcolonialtimeswiththeexplicitobjectiveofsupplyingoverseas
marketswithexoticgoodssuchastea,spicesandivory.Theabilitytoengageinillicitcross-
bordertradecontinuestohingeonthesehistoricalconnectionsandsocialtiestoholdersof
politicalofficeandthequalityofsuchpoliticalcontacts(Ellis/MacGaffey1996:31).Ellisargues
thattransnationaltradeoccupiesa“crucialstrategicposition”inAfricaduetoascarcityof
foreignexchangetobuymanufacturedgoods,which“canplayavitalroleintheconstruction
ofapoliticalpower-base”(ibid).TheaccesstohardcurrencysuchasUSDollarsiscrucialto
enterandsustainmarketposition:“…asuccessfulexporterfromAfricarequiresnotonlythe
usualrangeofcommercialskillsandcapital,butalsopolitical,andoftenalsophysical,
protection(Ellis/MacGaffey1996:34).”SimilartothetradeassociationsinMedievalEurope,
EllisalsoidentifiedtheformationoftradeassociationsofAfricanswithfellowAfricanslivingin
thediaspora.Theadvantagesaremanifoldsuchasrestrictingtheprofitstomembersofa
distinctsocialgroup(usuallykin),verticalintegrationofthetrade(e.g.Nigeriansmarketing
drugsinEuropeanorUScitiesonbehalfofNigeriandrugtraffickingnetworks)andsecure
accesstosourceandmarket(Ellis/MacGaffey1996:37).
67
Ofimportancetothisdissertationarethemechanismsemployedbyvariousactorsalongthe
supplychaintoensuretheirsecurityandthatoftheiragents,thesecurityofthesupplychain,
andthatoftheillegalgoods.Aretheabove-mentionedtradeassociationsofsignificancein
illegalflowsofrhinohorn?Securityrisksmayarisefromenvironmental,regulatory,intra-or
inter-organizationalfactors,furtherexacerbatedbythefactthatmarketexchangesareboth
illegalandtransnational.Howdoestheend-userofanillegalgoodensurethatitissafefor
consumption?Howdoesthebuyerensurethatanotheractorupstreamisnotcheatingher?
Doillegalmarketactorsoutsourcesecurity?Whatmechanismsareemployedtoensure
security?Thelegitimizationdeviceofcontestedillegalitymaysecuretheflowofrhinohornin
someinstances.Aswillbeshownlater,diplomatsandagentsofthestatehavesmuggled
rhinohornfromthesourcetothemarket.Itwouldappearaxiomaticthatsecurityconcerns
becomesecondaryifanillegalgoodistraffickedinsideadiplomaticpouch.Thequestion
arisinghereiswhetherdiplomatsarerecruitedbyillegalmarketactors,whetherdiplomats
areinstigators,orperhaps,opportunisticactors.
1.4Structureofthedissertation
Theargumentofthedissertationisthattheconsecutiveconservationregimesandprotection
economieshaveledtoahistoricallock-inthathasallowedtheillegalmarketinrhinohornto
flourish.Scatteredalongtheinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegality,importantactorsdonot
acceptthetradeban.Theyusecontestedillegalityasalegitimizingdevicetojustifygrayor
illegaleconomicactivities.
ThedissertationcontinueswithChapter2,whichprovidesbackgroundandjustificationfor
thechosenresearchapproach,selectionofresearchsites,methodsofdatacollectionand
analysis.Manyethicalissuesaroseduringinceptionandinthecourseoftheresearchproject.
Thesecondpartofthechapterlooksatissuesofanonymityandconfidentiality,informed
consent,powerdifferentialsbetweentheresearcherandrespondents,reciprocityand
securityconcerns.
68
Chapter3contributestoanuancedunderstandingofthevaluationofrhinohornasasacred
goodforwhichconsumersarewillingtopayahighprice.Thequestionofdemandandthe
associatedcoordinationproblemofvaluationarevitaltounderstandingwhyflowsofrhino
hornaresodifficulttodisrupt.Thischapterdealswiththedemandforrhinohornbytracing
thehistoricalrootsofitsvaluationasasacredgoodwithstatus-elevatingqualities.It
continueswithashortoverviewofcurrentuses,consumerprofilesandproduct
differentiation.
Chapter4pointstothepathdependencyofconservationregulators.Wildlifeprotectionwas
closelylinkedtocolonialdispossession,subjugation,exploitationandlossofhuntingrightsof
thelocalandindigenouscommunitiesduringthecolonialperiod.Problematicconservation
approachesandparadigmshaveledtoahistoricallock-in,whereromanticandutopian
notionsof‘Africa’sWildEden’continuetounderminethesupportandbuy-infromlocal
communitiesinwildlifeconservation.Thechapteralsoshowshowlegalrhinohornsupplies
wereestablishedthroughtheeconomicvaluationofrhinosonprivateland.
Chapter5explorestheinternationalpoliticalprotectionregimethatledtotheillegalizationof
thetradeinrhinohorn.Stateactorsconceivedofthemulti-lateralenvironmentaltreatymore
thanfortyyearsago.Thetradebanitselfisambiguousasitonlyconcernsinternationaltrade
ofrhinohorn,leavingspaceforillegalmarketactorstomanoeuvreatthedomesticlevel.
Whilemostcountrieshaveillegalizedrhinohorntrade,hornconsumptioncontinuestohover
inagrayzone.ThechaptershinesalightonwhyCITESislosingcredibilityamongststate
actorsandimportantactorsintheGlobalSouthandwhydiffusionoftradebansmayruninto
obstaclesinthemoderncontext.
Chapter6revolvesaroundgrayandsub-legalflowsofrhinohorn.Theseflowsinvolvewildlife
professionalswithintimateknowledgeofrhinohorn,theinstitutionalandlegislative
frameworkgoverningtheinternationaltradeofrhinohorn.Theseactorsbelongtoinfluential
andtransnationalsocialnetworkswithlinkstopoliticalandeconomicelitesinsupply,transit
andconsumercountries.Akeyfeatureoftheseflowsistheexploitationoflegaland
regulatoryloopholeswithinthesystem,asactorsrideontheedgeoflegality.
69
ThedissertationcontinueswithChapter7,whichdealswithillegalflowsofrhinohorns.Itis
arguedthatrhinopoachingisnotonlyacrimedrivenbygreedandimpoverishmentbutalso
motivatedbyenvironmentalandsocialjusticeprinciples.Thischapterdemonstratesthe
historicallock-inlinkedtoconservationparadigms,whichrendersdisruptionoftheseflowsa
difficultifnotimpossibleundertaking.Theincreasingmilitarizationofanti-poaching
operationsiscontributingtofurtheralienationoflocalcommunities,whichunderdifferent
circumstances,couldactasthefirstlineofdefenceagainstrhinopoaching.Actorsinthisflow
havemasteredthecoordinationproblemsofcompetition,cooperationandsecurity.
Thefinalchapteranalysesfakeand‘Ersatz’rhinohorn.Thechapterbeginswiththe
differentiationofdifferenttypesoffakerhinohornbeforelookingatactorsinvolvedinthe
productionanddistributionofsuchhorns.Theresearchidentifiedtheroleoftherhinohorn
assessor,whofulfilsthefunctionofqualitycontrolandriskmitigation.Thechapterillustrates
howactorsbridgeseveralcoordinationproblems,namelythecoordinationproblemsofvalue,
cooperationandsecurity.Inlightofthehighpriceofrhinohorn,itisnotsurprisingthat
criminalentrepreneursaswellasactorsfromthelegalsector,haveseizedthisthriving
businessopportunity.
Thedissertationconcludeswithanassessmentofwhytransnationalflowsofrhinohornshave
beensodifficulttodisrupt.
70
Chapter2:Researchingillegalmarkets
“Theillegalityofthedrugindustryprecludestheuseofmanycommonresearchsourcesandtechniquesandimposesstrongconstraintsontheinterpretationofavailableinformation.Thecomplexityofthesubjectmatterandthedatalimitationsmakeitimpossibletodrawacompleteandaccuratepictureoftheindustry.Researchingillegaldrugsislikepaintingimpressionisticratherthanrealisticpictures.Thepainterhopesthatthepictureprovidesanapproximateandslightlydistortedvisionofreality,highlightingthemainaspects;heorshedoesnotpretendtopaintanexactreplica.”(Thoumi2003:2)
2.1IntroductionFranciscoThoumi’sopeningquotationtothischaptersuccinctlycapturesthedifficultyof
researchingillegalmarkets.Researchersfacemultiplechallengesrangingfromaccessto
informantstoverificationofdata.Asshowninthepreviouschapter,limitedempirical
researchexistsonillegalrhinomarkets.Withtheexceptionofawell-researchedjournalistic
exposé(see:Rademeyer2012),streamsofscholarlyandpolicyliteraturestakea‘top-down
approach’.Whilecollectingdata,researchersthusengagealmostexclusivelywithrule-makers
includingconservators,governmentregulatorsandothereconomicandpoliticalelites.Asa
resultofthis,thereareonlyahandfulofstudiesthatdealwiththeentiremarketexchange,
from“production”(poaching,huntingortheft)ofrhinohornandtransnational“product”
exchangethroughtounderstandingtheconsumermarkets(Ayling2013;Milliken/Shaw2012).
ItisfromthispointofdeparturethatIchosetostudytheillegalrhinohornmarketinits
entirety,takingabottom-upandsideways66approachtounderstandingeconomic,political
andsocialstructures,powerconstellations,rule-makingandculturalframing.Thefollowing
chapterhonesinonthedifficultiesassociatedwithstudyingillegalmarketsingeneral,andthe
illegalmarketinrhinohorninspecific.Mymethodologicalchoicesareexplainedandhow
impasseswerebridged.Thefinalsectiondelvesintoethicalconcerns.67
66Dubow(1995:8)arguesthatthenotionofbottom-uportop-downideasoversimplifiythetransmissionprocess.Atanygivenpointintimetherearemanyfashionablethoughts;whether“theygetpickedup”andpopularizedbythought-leadersislinkedtotheextent“thattheymayresonatewithwidersocialconcerns”.67Asthischapterdealswithpersonalaswellasscholarlychoices,Ichosetowriteinthefirstperson.Inlaterchapters,Ireverttothelesspersonalthird-personnarrative.
71
2.2Researchingillegalmarkets
Scholarsfromthefieldsofcriminology,sociologyandanthropologyhaveundertaken
intriguingqualitativeandmixedmethodsresearchintoillegalmarketsandassociated
criminal,politicalandeconomicstructures.Thestudyofcrime,criminalactorsandillegal
marketsinsituhasalongtraditioninthesedisciplines(Jacques/Wright2008).Several
ethnographicstudies,includingresearchintocrackcocainedealing(Jacobs1999),hustling
(Pryce1979),Venkatesh’sbookbasedonthedecadehespentwiththe‘BlackKings’gangin
Chicago(Venkatesh2008)orSteinberg’sresearchintoSouthAfricanprisongangs(Steinberg
2004;Steinberg2005b)arerecognizedfortheirscholarlycontributionsontheinnerworkings
ofillegalmarketsandgangsatthelocallevel.However,studyingillegalmarketsandactors
beyondtheconfinesofthenation-state(transnationallyorregionally)isladenwithadditional
logisticalandotherchallenges,andhencedonelessfrequently.Exceptionaltransnational
studiesinclude,amongstothers,researchintoorgantrafficking(Scheper-Hughes2000),
humantrafficking(Chin/Finckenauer2011;Shelley2010;Bales1999),peoplesmuggling
(Zhang/Chin2002;Zhang/Gaylord1996),thecocainetrade(Kenney2007;Thoumi2003),
traffickingofantiquitiesandculturalobjects(Mackenzie/Davis2014),cigarette‘bootlegging’
intheEuropeanUnion(Hornsby/Hobbs2007),theillicitarmsindustry(Ruggiero1996),and
theworldheroinmarket(Paoli/Reuter/Greenfield2009;McCoy[1972]2003).
WiththenotableexceptionofRebeccaWong’sdoctoralresearchintotheorganizationofthe
illegaltigerpartstrade(Wong2013)andMoyle’sstudyonthesamesubject(Moyle2009),
TanyaWyatt’sresearchintotheillegalfurandfalcontradesinRussia(Wyatt2009;Wyatt
2011),researchintoivorymarkets(Gao/Clark2014),caviar(Zabyelina2014),parrots(Pires
2014),abalone(Hauck1997)andafewothers,scholarshavechosentoanalyseillegalwildlife
marketsfromthecomfortoftheiroffices.68Desktopstudiesareattractivewhenample
empiricalandsecondarydataincludingmediaandtechnicalreports,existandareeasyto
access(seeforexampleMoreto/Clarke2014;Moretoetal.2014).Incountrieswherecrime
68Theliteraturereviewacknowledgedexistingresearchintoillegalrhinohorntrades.Rademeyer(2012)didfieldworkatthesourceandinmarkets.Ayling(2013)usedsecondarydatawhileothers(Büscher/Ramutsindela2016;Lunstrum2014;Montesh2013;Massé/Lunstrum2016;Fenio2014)conductedtargetedfieldworkinpoachinghotspots.Technicalreportsreliedlargelyondocumentaryandtradeanalysis(seeforexample:Milliken2014;Milliken/Shaw2012).
72
data,policereportsandcourtmaterialsarereadilyavailable,researchersmightwantto
foregoheadingoutintothefield.Fieldwork,however,doesprovideaccessto“fieldsofaction
andexperiencesthatotherwisereceivescantornoacademicanalysis”(Goldsmith2003:104).
Thecitedscholarsinterviewedactiveorconvictedcriminals,andsometimestheirlaw
enforcementcounterpartswereincludedinthesample,situatingtheillegalmarketinbroader
socialandpoliticalstructures.Engagingwithillegalmarketactorsandregulatorsisnotonly
importantfordataverification;italsoprovidesajuxtapositionof“underworld”versus
“upperworld”views.Thisinclusiveapproachstandsatloggerheadswithtraditionaltop-down
approaches.Inchoosingtheconventionalrouteresearcherswouldtypicallyconductahandful
ofexpertinterviewswithpoliticaloreconomicelites,whichoftenresultsindataassimilation
tosuitpoliticaloreconomicinterests(seeanalysisofhowpolicingnarrativesinfluencedthe
perpetuationofthe“alienconspiracytheory”intheUSinLombardo2013).
Manyoftheaforementionedstudiesextendbeyondthepoliticalboundariesofthenation-
stateandinvolvemonthsofpainstakinglyconductedfieldworkstretchingovermonths,
sometimesyears,oftenfarawayfromtheresearcher’scomfortzone.Researchersface
multiplechallengesinthefieldwhenundertakingmulti-sitedorcross-borderresearchinto
illegalmarkets.Beyondlogisticalconcerns(mobility,languageproficiencyandfinances),
additionalproblemsmayariseduetounfamiliarregulatoryframeworksgoverningdata
collection,securityoftheresearchteam,ethicsandpositionality.Forexample,thelead
researchersresponsiblefortheworldheroinstudyoutsourcedindividualcountrystudiesto
localexperts.Outsourcingdatacollectionmightprovidealocalfootholdbutthelead
researcherhaslimitedcontroloverthequalityofthedata.Localexpertsmightgetexposedto
associationalriskssuchasaccusationsofspyingonbehalfofforeigninterests(Glazer1970).
Theremarksoftheleadauthorsoftheworldheroinstudy(Paoli/Reuter/Greenfield2009:7)
areinstructivewithregardstoundertakingtransnationalresearchintoillegalactivities:
“Itisdifficulttogatherthisinformationevenindemocraticnationswithrelativelyopengovernmentsandsophisticateddatacollectionsystems.Itisexceptionallydifficultinnationsthatareclosed,haveweakdatacollectionsystems,orhavelittletraditionofpublishingpolicy-relevantdata.Drug-relatedcorruptioncreatesstillfurtherobstaclesinsomecountries.”
73
Undertakingfieldworkintothesociallifeofotherscomeswithitschallengesandevenmore
sowhenenteringtherealmofgreyorillegalactivities.Thetargetedassassinationof
sociologistKenPryce(hewasresearchinghighmurderratesinJamaicaatthetimeofhis
death)orthehomicideofa“fixer”(researchfacilitator)involvedinpreparatoryworkfora
studyoftheRussianshippingindustry(Belousovetal.2007)aretheexception.Violationsthat
threatentheresearcher’swell-beingandsafety(Jacobs2006:157)areonefacetofthedanger
spectrum.WhileconductingastudyofpoliceaccountabilityinColombia,Australian
researcherGoldsmith(2003),forexample,wasthoughttobeaUSDrugEnforcementAgency
(DEA)“spy”(intelligenceoperative)whenhewalkedthestreetsofapoorneighbourhoodin
BogotainthecompanyoftwoColumbiancommunitypoliceofficers.Hemanagedtoescape
thetensesituationunharmedbutemotionallyshaken.BruceJacobs(1998)waslesslucky.
Oneofhistrustedsourcesinanon-goingresearchprojectintostreet-levelcrackcocaine
dealingrobbedhimatgunpointandtelephonestalkedhimafterthat.Lessdangerousbut
equallyconcerningistheresearcher’sexposuretolegaldangerssuchasbeingconsideredan
accessorytoacrime(Jacobs2006:158).Polsky(1967:141)capturedhowuncalculatedrisksin
thefieldmightderivefromunexpectedsources:
“[I]fonerefusestobeasociologistofthejailhouseorcourtsystem,takesMalinowskitoheart,andgoesoutintothefield,thereisriskinvolved...Itisthesortofriskthatwritersofcriminologytexts,foralltheireagernesstoputdownfieldwork,surprisinglydon’tmention:mostofthedangerforthefieldworkercomesnotfromthecannibalsandheadhuntersbutfromthecolonialofficials.”
Withafewexceptions(suchastheearliermentioned:Venkatesh2008),ahandfulofscholars
hasundertakenembeddedresearchintoillegalmarketsorgangs.Whilefewacademic
institutionswouldallowtheirstafforstudentstoundertakeovertlydangerousfieldwork,
investigativejournalistsarelikelytofacefewerinstitutionalobstacles(suchasagrillingby
ethicscommitteesatuniversities)whenembarkingonstudytoursofthe“underworld”.
InvestigativejournalistRobertoSaviano(2007),forexample,studiedtheNeapolitanmafia
whileembeddedintheCamorra’sstructures.AfterhisbookGomorrahwaspublished,he
receiveddeaththreatsfromhisformermafiacolleaguesandcontinuestoliveunder24-hour
policeguardtothisday.WhileSaviano’sbookhasprovidedamplematerialforscholarly
74
analysis(seeforexample:Varese2006),scholarshavequestionedthecredibilityofdata
presentedelsewhere(foracritiqueofGlenny's"McMafia"seeLevi2009).Although
journalisticinvestigationsareoftencriticizedforlackinginacademicrigourandverifiable
data,scholarsarenotshieldedfromsuchcritiques.Goffman’sethnography(Goffman2013;
Goffman2009)intothelivesofyoungblackmeninalow-incomeneighbourhoodin
Philadelphiahasledtoapublicwitch-huntagainstthesociologist(seeforexample:Lubnet
2015;Parry2015).Reviewersexpressedconcernsabouttheaccuracyofherportrayalofthe
blackexperience,thesoundnessofhermethods,thepossibilitythatherbookmightharmits
subjects,andshewasevenaccusedofbeinganaccompliceinthecommissionofacrime
(Lubnet2015;Parry2015).Parry(2015)surmises:
“Thedust-uprevealsanxietiesthatgobeyondthecensureofMs.Goffman,openingafreshdebateoverlongstandingdilemmasofethnographicresearch:theethicalboundariesoffieldwork,thetensionbetweendatatransparencyandsubjects'privacy,andthereliabilityofoneethnographer'ssubjectiveaccountofasocialworld.Somesociologistsworrythatthecontroversymayputachillonsensitivefieldwork.Othersfearthatitcoulddamagethecredibilityofethnographyatatimewhensociologistsarebeingexhortedtogetmoreinvolvedinpublicdebates.”
SomeofGoffman’scriticsdisplayalimitedunderstandingoflong-standingdebatesasregards
“goingnative”69ornot(Stoller2015)inthedisciplineofanthropology.Thefallout(and
collegialsupportbysome)fromGoffman’sethnographydemonstratestheimportanceof
documentingandjustifyingmethodologicalandethicalchoicesmadeinpursuitofresearch.
Thisshortreflectionacknowledgespastscholarlyventuresintothefieldwhilealsobeing
mindfulofexposingpotentialdangersandshortfalls.Ihavepurposefullyfocusedonresearch
thatextendedbeyondthereachofthearmchairanddesktop(theproverbialivorytower).It
followsfromtheabovethatdataverification,mediationofpotentialdangersandpositionality
areofparticularimportancewhenstudyingtransnationalillegalmarkets.Personalexperience
andexposuretofieldworkinthepastrenderedthisthepreferredoption,especiallyinlightof
thesparsefirst-handdataregardingsocial,economicandpoliticalstructuresandsystemsof
meaningunderpinningillegalandgrayflowsofrhinohorn.Muchthoughtwentintothe
planningandexecutionofthedatacollectionphaseofthisproject.Givencritiquesof
69‘Goingnative’referstoembeddedresearch.
75
subjectivity(seenextsection)andthelackofreproducibledatasets,triangulationand
verificationofdatawerevitalcomponentsoftheresearchprocess.Therhinofieldissteeped
innarratives,controversiesandmyths.Sortingfactfromfictionandsituatingnarrativesin
specificpolitical,economicorhistoricalcontextswereessentialstepsintheresearchprocess.
Thefollowingsectionswillexpandonthechallenges,opportunities,strengthsandweaknesses
ofthechosenapproach.
2.2.1Choosingthequalitativeroute
Onthebasisoftheearlierobservations,itisperhapsnotsurprisingthatlargefactionsofthe
academiccommunityconsiderthestudyofactivecriminalsandillegalmarketsachallenging
andpotentiallydangerousundertaking.Fieldworkisoftenshunnedbecauseofthedangers
andrisksassociatedwithdelvingintothe“underworld”(Wong2015:1).Scholarsencounter
difficultiesingeneratingtheirdata,astheresearchobjectorsubjectmaynotonlybe
shroudedinsecrecy,butsecurityconcernsmayariseaswell.Thesemayleadtoan
overrelianceoncontestedcrimeandinterdictionstatisticsorsecondarydata,renderingmany
aresearchstudymethodologicallyunsoundorrepetitive.Fioramonti(2014)makesa
convincingargumentregardingthedangersandsometimeshiddenagendasunderpinning
numbersandstatistics,especiallywhensuchnumbersareusedtoreinforcethelogicofthe
marketonsocialandpoliticallife.Statisticsaboutthesizeandvalueofillegalwildlifemarkets
areparticularlycontested(Naylor2004:263;Harken2011:11),thenumbersarenonetheless
co-optedintopolicyandscholarlyliteratureonthesubject.Availablestatisticsinthenarrow
fieldofrhinoresearchfailtoinspireconfidenceandreliability.ConservationNGOsclaimthat
rhinopoachingstatisticsaremanipulated(Schrader2015),arrestdataandconvictionsrates
areunreliable(Interviewwithrhinoexpert,2015;interviewwithpoliceinvestigatorsand
prosecutors,2013),andthecurrentrhinopopulationnumbersarecontested(duToit2015).
Therequestforwhatwouldappeartobe“harmless”numbers(suchasthenumberofanti-
poachingandgeneralstaffdeployedinparks),potentiallyexplosivedata(suchasthesizeof
anti-poachingbudgetsandbasicsalaryinformationofparkemployees)orunequivocally
controversialdata(numberofallegedpoacherskilledinSouthAfricanparksorrhinohorn
traffickersprosecutedandconvictedinVietnam)inpursuitofthisresearchallproved
76
immenselydifficulttoattainifforthcomingatall.Whilethepoliticalsensitivitiesandpotential
falloutunderpinningthelatterrequestareunderstandable,70the‘rhinoissue’hasbecome
securitizedandasaresult,manyprobingquestionsorlegitimaterequestsforquantitative
dataaredismissedas“forprivilegedaccessonly”(Iwillreturntothislaterinthischapter).
Whenstudyingillegalmarkets,traditionalquantitativemethodssuchastheadministrationof
questionnairesandsurveyscouldeasilybemisconstruedaspoliceinterrogations,likelyto
leadtolimitedandbiasedresults(Sissener2001:6).Quantitativeresearcherstendto
disengagefromthepeopleandthesubjecttheyarestudyingbyfocusingonstatistical
correlationsofvariables(Gray2009:165).Thevirtuesofquantitativeapproachesarenot
disputedhere;theliteraturereviewreferredtosubstantialcontributions.Moreover,
qualitativeandquantitativeapproachesarenotmutuallyexclusivegiventherecentinterestin
mixedmethodsresearch(Flick[1998]2014:35).However,numbercrunchingandstatistical
analysesofpotentiallybiasedandincompletedatasetsappearillsuitedinpursuitofa
sociologicalunderstandingofillegalrhinohornmarkets.
Incontrasttotheimpliedobjectivityandvalidityofthequantitativeapproach,qualitative
researcherssustaintheirresearchbyengagingwith“people’ssocialandculturalconstructions
oftheirreality”(Gray,opcit)andtheirlivedexperiences.Theanalysisofspecificcasesintheir
temporalandspatialparticularity(Flick[1998]2014:22)providesusefulsourcesforanalysis
andtheory-building.SomeofthekeyelementsofqualitativeresearchlistedbyMilesand
Huberman(1994:6)illuminatewhythequalitativeapproachiswell-suitedforastudyof
illegalandgrayflowsofrhinohorn:Itisconductedthroughintenseorprolongedcontactwith
thefield.Theresearcher’sroleistogaina“holistic”overviewofthecontextthrougha
“processofdeepattentiveness,ofempatheticunderstanding(Verstehen),andofsuspending
or“bracketing”preconceptionsaboutthetopicsunderdiscussion”.Theresearchercaptures
data“fromtheinside”,whichneedtobereviewedandverifiedwithrespondents.Inlightof
theinsufficientquantitativedataavailable,limitedpossibilitiesofquantitativedata
70Therhinopoachingcrisis,aswellasthegreatnumberofMozambicancitizens,killedinsidetheKrugerNationalPark(accordingtoMozambicansources,400MozambicanshavelosttheirlivesinsidetheKNPsince2009–seeChapter7),haveledtofurthercomplicationsinthealreadyacrimoniousdiplomaticrelationsbetweenSouthAfricaandMozambique.Atthetimeoffieldwork,VietnameseauthoritieswerepointingtoChinaasthemajorconsumermarket.
77
generationandmypreferenceforfieldwork,aqualitativeresearchapproachwasthe
preferredchoice.Theresearchsoughtanalternativetothedominantnarrative,whichcannot
begainedfromcrunchingnumbersbutfromengagingwithpeople’slivedindividual
experiences.Thefollowingsub-sectionexpandsonthechosenresearchdesignofmulti-sited
ethnography.
2.2.2Researchdesign:Amulti-sitedethnography
Thedisciplineofanthropologyisknownforitsfrequentapplicationofethnographicresearch.
Amongstthevirtuesoftheapproacharetheresearcher’sintenseinteractionwithactors,
gettingimmersedinthefield(“goingnative”)andinsituexposuretosystemsofcultural
meaning(seeforexampleHart1988;Malinowski/Young1979).However,theethnographer’s
focusonspecificplacesorgroupshasbeencritiquedforstaticandatomicreproductionsof
socialrelations(Desmond2014)and“methodologicalnationalism”–thereductionoflived
experiencestothenation-stateinsteadofacknowledgingavarietyofmacrosocialand
transnationalcontexts(Weiß/Nohl2012).Forthepurposesofstudyingflowsofrhinohorn,
anethnographicresearchdesignappealedduetoitsfocusonsystemsofculturalmeaning
withintemporal-spatialcontexts.Anuancedvariant–themulti-sitedethnography–eschews
thecritiqueofmethodologicalnationalism,insofarastheethnographerfocusesondynamic
relationshipsandconnectionsthattranscendthelocalcontextandtheconfinesofthenation-
state.
Whenapplyingtheresearchdesignofmulti-sitedethnographies,researchersreplacemicro-
perspectiveswiththestudyofrelationshipsorconnectionsbetweensites,ideas,informants
and/orthings(Marcus1999:7).Proponentsoftheresearchdesignhaveco-optedelementsof
theworld-systemsapproachastheorizedbyWallersteinandothersinthe1970s.71However,
71Wallerstein’sworldsystemsapproachwasnovelandrevolutionaryinthe1970s,questioningkeyelementsofthetheoryofmodernizationsuchasthestate-centredapproachandEurocentricperspectivesonthedevelopmentdiscourse.Theapproachreceivedafairamountofcritique(seeforexample:Skocpol1977);forthepurposesofthediscussionhereWallerstein’snotionoftheworldsystemasasetofmechanismsemployedtoredistributesurplusvaluefromthe‘periphery’(GlobalSouth)tothe‘core’(GlobalNorth)suffices(Wallerstein2011).Withtheexceptionoftrophyhunting,theftofrhinohornandhornartefacts,therhinohornexchangeoccurslargelyoutsidewhatWallersteindefinedas“core”nations.However,inlightofchanginggeopoliticsand
78
forinvestigating“commoditychains”or“flows”,thetheoreticalorientationofemployingthe
world-systemastheunitofanalysiscreatespracticalproblemsasitfocusesatthemacro–
levelonly(Talbot2004:5-6).72TotheculturalanthropologistMarcus(1995),theapplication
ofmulti-sitedethnographiespresentsacomplementaryresearchdesignthatincorporatesthe
structuralelementsoftheworld-systemsapproachwithoutrelyingonitforthe“contextual
architectureframingasetofsubjects”(Marcus1995:96).Italsoprovidesamanageable
researchapproachandunitsofanalysis.Heobserves:
“Multi-sitedresearchisdesignedaroundchains,paths,threads,conjunctionsorjuxtapositionsoflocationsinwhichtheethnographerestablishessomeformofliteral,physicalpresence,withanexplicit,positedlogicofassociationorconnectionamongsitesthatinfactdefinestheargumentoftheethnography(Marcus1995:105).”
Proponentsofmulti-sitedresearchfollowthetrajectoriesofpeople,images,plotsandideas
(Marcus1995:107).Latour(1993)andHaraway(1991)werepioneersinextendingtherealm
andsitesofscientificinquirythroughtheinvestigationofnon-humanactorsandcyborgs.The
“followthething”approachhasgainedrecognitioninrecentyears.73Appadurai(1994:76-91)
demonstratesintheintroductiontoTheSocialLifeofThingshowthestatusofthingsas
“commodities,gifts,andresources”incirculationchangeacrosstimeandspatialcontextby
drawingondifferenttypesof“scapes”(localcontexts).Peopleexperience,defineand
interpretglobalprocessesfromtheirparticularlocalframeofreference;and“globalforces
areplottedagainstconstellationsoflocalcircumstance,fragmentarytoanoutsideobserver
butformingacoherent,fixedview–a“scape”–toalocal”(Bestor2001:80).Kopytoff(1986:
theascendancyofChinaastheworld’ssecondlargesteconomy,thenotionofanunequaldistributionofsurplusvalueattachedtorhinohornfrom“peripheralstates”insouthernAfricatoVietnam(notacorenation)andChina(arguablya‘core’nation)ishenceonlypartiallyvalid.72Talbotusedthecommoditychainapproachforhisanalysisoftheglobalcoffeesupplychain.Thisapproachpresents“anintermediatelevelofanalysis,biggerthanthenation-statebutsmallerthantheentireworldsystem”(Talbot2004:6).Whilefocusingonthespecificcommodityathand,thefloworcommoditychainisinterdependentonotherflows.Hearguesthatitisimpossibletoanalyzeproducers,consumersandotheractorswithoutsituatingthecommodityflowwithinthebroaderworldeconomy(ibid).73TheapproachisnottobeconfusedwithMarx’notionof‘commodityfetishism’,accordingtowhichproducersandsuppliersperceiveofoneanotherintermsofthemoneyandgoodsthattheyexchange(Marx[1867]2015).Criticalfetishism,ontheotherhand,isqualitativelyclosertothe“followthething”approachbecauseitincorporatesa“heightenedappreciationfortheactivematerialityofthingsinmotion”(Foster2006:286).
79
66)addsthatascommoditiestravelacrosstimeandgeographies,theirvalueandmeanings
changeandtheytakeontheirown“culturalbiography”.AccordingtoFoster(2006:285),the
renewedfocusofacademiaonthemovementofcommoditiesshows“howsuchmovement
linksgeographicallyseparatelocalesandconnectsproducersandconsumersstratifiedby
class,ethnicity,andgender”.Theapproachishoweverfarremovedfromamechanicaljoining
thedotsbetween‘a’and‘b’;insteadscholarstrace“socialrelationsandmateriallinkagesthat
thismovementcreatesandwithinwhichthevalueofcommoditiesemerges”(Foster2006:op
cit).Whileglobalizationmayhaveledtoageographicdistancebetweenproducers,
consumersandothermarketactorsasfarastransnationalsupplychainsareinvolved,the
flowofgoods,information,andcapitalconnectactorsonacultural,economicandsociallevel
thattranscendstimeandplace.74Mintz’research(1985)onsugar,forexample,tracesthe
commodity’soriginsbackwardintimefromdomesticationthroughtoitsspreadthroughout
theWesternindustrialworld.Tsing(2005)showshowacomplexexplanationofdeforestation
inIndonesiaisnotfoundintherainforestsofIndonesiaalonebutbyundertakingan
“ethnographyofglobalconnection”.Bestor(2001:92)investigatestheglobalpopularityof
sushiasa“complexeconomicrelationship”betweentheEastandtheWest.Withregardsto
illicitcommoditiesandservices,severalscholarshavelikewise‘followedthething’.Nancy
Scheper-Hughes(2004)explorestheillegalcirculationofhumansandtheirbodypartsacross
theplanet.GordonMathews’(2011)depictionofmigrantsfromacrosstheworldlivingin
ChunkingMansionsinHongKongrevealstheircloseconnectiontotheinternational
circulationofgoods,moneyandideas.CarolynNordstrom(2007:207)sketchestheflowof
“il/legal”goodsandpeople(Nordstrom’swordplay)beyondthereachofthestate,whichshe
depictsas“static”,“bounded”and“defined”.Thestaticnatureofthe‘state’asamonolith
standsatloggerheadswiththedynamicnotionofcircuitsandflowsinwhichnon-stateactors
playasignificantrole,whichislikelytorattlelong-standingconceptionsofpowerand
authorityasespousedinWesterntheoriesofthestateandstatebuilding.
Animportantelementofmulti-sitedethnographiesrelatestothecarefulobservationofhow
goodscirculateinsteadofassumingtheinfluenceofgovernancestructuresapriori.Inthis
74Thistrailofthoughtconnectstooneofthemainthesesofeconomicsociology,namelythatmarketsareembeddedinsocialnetworks.
80
researchproject,Isoughttofollowtheflows(pathways)ofrhinohornfromthesourcetothe
market.Theresearchdesigncomesnotwithoutitsshortfalls.Marcus(1995)providesa
thought-provokingassessmentoftheapproach,detailingmethodologicalproblemswhile
drawingthereader’sattentiontoitsgreatestadvantage,thebridgingofthedualistic“them–
usframeofconventionalethnography”(Marcus1995:100).ToMarcus,thelossofthe
subaltern,thesubstitutionofqualityanddepthwithquantityandsuperficiality,aswellasthe
intensityandimpracticalityoffieldworkduetospreadingtheanalyticallensacrossmultiple
researchsitesarelegitimateconcerns.Heobserves:“Theinevitableconnotationofmulti-sited
asatermissomethingthatisprofligate,impatient,unfocused,emphasizingsurfacerather
thandepth,andrequiringeffortbeyondthecapacityofthesinglefieldworker”(Marcus1999:
7).Bestor(2001:78)likewisewarnsofthedangerofpresenting“drive-byethnography”when
undertakingawhistle-stoptourofresearchsiteswithoutsufficienttimeandpreparationset
asidetounderstandtheintricaciesoftheresearchsite,itsconnections,andsignificancetothe
overallcommoditychain,flowormarket.
Cognizantofthedangersofsuperficialanalysis,thismulti-sitedethnographyiscentredonthe
globalflowsofonespecificthing:rhinohorn.Althoughtheresearchentailedvisitstoseveral
differentresearchsites(describedbelow),greatcarewastakennottodilutetheresearch
focus.Theproverbialcrossingofthebridgebetween“usandthem”ledtoabetter
understandingofactors’motivations,framesandinstitutions.Aswillbeshowninlater
sections,thedesignationofrhinohornasacommodityiscontestedamongstcertainactors,
whobelieverhinohornshouldnotbeforsaleorconsideredacommodityinthefirstplace.
The‘followthething’approachisthusseenasaneutralpointofdepartureinlieuofusingthe
terminologyofcommoditychains.Rhinohornitselfisusedastheintegratingperspective
aroundwhichdiversedataareorganizedandanalysed.Theremainderofthischapterdeals
withmethodologicalandethicalchoicesmadeduringthisproject,someofwhichspeakto
critiquesof(multi-sited)ethnographiesandhowtheywereresolved.
81
2.2.3Single-casestudyandtheoreticaldevelopmentCasestudieshavebeenpraisedfortheachievementofhighconceptualvalidity,thecapacity
toaddresscausalcomplexityandtoderivenewhypotheses(George/Bennett2005:20–22).A
single-casestudyinvolvestheintensiveempiricalinquiryofaparticularcasewiththepurpose
of“shed[ding]lightonalargeclassofcases(apopulation)”(Gerring2007:20).Therearea
numberoflimitationsandpossible“trade-offs”,suchascaseselectionbias,theexchangeof
parsimonyforthickdescriptions,aswellasindeterminacyandlimitationstothe
generalizabilityoffindings(George/Bennett2005:22).Thechoiceofasinglecasestudymay
bequestionedonthebasisoftheabovearguments.However,‘following’several‘things’
(broadeningtheresearchscopebeyondrhinohorn)wouldhaverenderedtheresearch
impracticalanddatavolumesunmanageable;notwithstandingthethreatoffurtheramplifying
thepitfallsof“drive-byethnography”(seeprevioussection).Thisdissertationisorganized
aroundflowsofrhinohorn–thejourneyofrhinohornfromthebushtothemarket.While
theanalysisfocusesonrhinohorn,different‘cases’areinvestigatedandcontextualized.
MultipleresearchsitesandinformantsfromheterogeneousbackgroundsinsouthernAfrica
andSoutheastAsiaenrichthissinglecasestudy.Moreover,Yin(1994:38–40)submitsthatthe
selectionofasinglecasestudyisjustifiedifthecaseconstitutesa“criticalcase”,“anextreme
oruniquecase”ora“revelatorycase”.75
Inthisinstance,Yin’sthree-prongedcriteriaapply.Thecharismaticrhinohasgarnered
worldwideattentionfromconservationNGOs,internationalorganizations,militaryand
securityoutfits,governmentdepartmentsandcivilsociety,andcausedamoralpanicamongst
someoftheseactors.Therhinofieldissteepedincontroversies,rangingfromalacking
acknowledgmentofthecoloniallegaciesunderpinningAfricanwildlifeconservationthrough
tocontestedsolutionsaimedatdisruptingthemarket.Fewsocialscientists(seeliterature
review)haveengagedwiththerhinoissue,renderingthisstudytimeous.Therhinois
emblematicofotherendangeredspeciesoffaunaandflora,andhence,certainfindings
regardingthestructureandfunctioningofgrayandillegalflowsmaybeofrelevanceto
75Arevelatorycaseexistswhentheresearcherhas“anopportunitytoobserveandanalyzeaphenomenonpreviouslyinaccessibletoscientificinvestigation”(Yin1994:40).
82
analysesofotherwildlifemarkets.Forexample,across-caseanalysisofshadowcasesmaybe
usefulindeterminingwhichfactorsleadtospecificmarketoutcomesandassistin
constructinganexplanationastowhytherhinocasemaybedifferentfromotherillegal
wildlifemarkets,orwhyitisthesame.Cross-caseanalysisalsomakessenseofuniquefindings
andassistsinarticulatinghypothesesandtheoriesdiscoveredduringdatacollection
(Khan/VanWynsberghe2008).
InmyformerroleasappliedpolicyresearcherataSouthAfricanresearchinstitute,Ifirst
engagedwiththe‘rhinopoachingproblem’througharegionalprojectonorganizedcrime
trendsinSouthernAfricain2009.76Adecade-longresearchcareerpriortoembarkingonthe
journeytowardsthedoctorateallowedmetobuildupaprofessionalandsocialnetworkof
contactswithinthebroaderfieldofcrimeresearchinthesouthernAfricanregionandbeyond.
Thesenetworks,knowledgeoftheresearchsubjectandfieldworkexperiencefacilitated
(sometimesprivileged)accesstoabroadspectrumofrelevantactors.
Whilethetheoreticalandexplanatoryapproachesofthisdissertationaregroundedin
economicsociology,theresearchapproachwaspartiallyguidedbyprinciplesofgrounded
theory.Inessence,groundedtheoryinvolvesareiterativeresearchprocesswheredata
collectionisinterspersedwithperiodsofdataanalysisandconceptformation.Theunderlying
expectationofgroundedtheoryisthat“theoreticalpreconceptionsshouldbeavoidedin
ordertoallowtheorytoemergefromdata”(Flick[1998]2014:84).Asdataaccumulate,the
researcherbeginstoframeinterpretations.Itwasimportanttocheckdataagainstthose
interpretationsbecause“thedatathemselvesdonotlie”(Strauss/Corbin1998:45).While
groundedtheoryallowsforflexibilityasregardsdatacollectionastheoriesevolve,three
techniquesareessential:“makingcomparisons,askingquestions,andsampling”
(Strauss/Corbin1998:46).
Datacollectionandsamplingwasdrivenbytheoreticalandempiricalgaps;initially,these
relatedtothegeneralstructureandfunctioningofillegalmarkets.Iaddedandcompareddata
76Rhinopoachingwasidentifiedasagrowingorganizedcrimeconcernatthetime.Iprovidedresearchfindingsandpolicyrecommendationstotheregionalpolicingorganization,theSouthernAfricanRegionalPoliceChiefsCooperationOrganization(SARPCCO),andconservationNGOsonrhinopoachinganditsconnectionsto‘organizedcrime’.
83
gleanedfromrespondentstoexploretheoreticalhunchesand“illustratenewvariations”(Flick
[1998]2014:86).Importantconceptualandtheoreticalelementsemerged,suchasthenotion
ofcontestedillegality,thestructuralimportanceoftheinterfacebetweenlegalityand
illegality,andthesecuritizationofrhinoconservation.Theresearchquestionevolvedandthe
theoreticalfocuswassharpenedduringthereiterativeprocess.Groundedtheoryhasbeen
criticizedonmanyaccounts.Criticsdoubtwhetherresearcherscanundertakeresearch
withoutpreconceivedideasandpracticeanunbiased,neutralapproach,nottaintedbypre-
existingvalues,assumptions,andvalues(Flick[1998]2014:94).Ahealthydoseofnaïveté
underpinstheassumedneutralityofgroundedtheory,asitdemandsofresearchersthe
capabilitytoplaywhatDonnaHarawaycalledthe‘Godtrick’(Haraway1991).77Mindfulofthis
limitation,Iconsideredmypositionality(theethicssectiondealswiththisinmoredetail)and
Weltbild(situatedperspectives)inapproachingdatacollectionandanalysis.
2.4MethodsThefollowingsectionconsidersthedifferentmethodsofdatacollectionemployedduringthe
courseofthisresearchproject,including:(a)aliteraturereview,(b)archivalresearch,(c)Web
2.0research,(d)interviews,(e)focusgroups,(f)participantobservationand(g)participation
inmeetings.Eachmethodcomeswithasetoflimitationsandethicalconsiderations.Irefer
brieflytotheseethicalconsiderationsundereachheading;thefinalsectionofthischapteris
dedicatedtobroaderethicalconsiderationsandsecurityconcerns.Theliteraturereview,
archivalandWeb2.0researchwereundertakeninlibrarysettings.Theinterviews,focus
groups,participantobservationsandparticipationinmeetingsformedpartofthefieldwork
component.
77Haraway(1991)arguesconvincinglyagainsttraditionalnotionsofobjectivityinscienceandphilosophy,whichassumethattheinvestigatorcanremoveherselffromtheobjectofinquiry.Shebelievesthatthistypeofobjectivityisimpossibletoachieve;sheassociatesthe“God-trick”withscholars,whoeschewargumentationandtakingaclearpositionbasedontheirperspectivesandpositionality.
84
2.4.1Desktopandarchivalresearch
(a) LiteraturereviewLiteraturereviewsarenotusuallylistedasmethodsfordatacollection.Thisresearchproject,
however,reliedheavilyoninsightsgleanedfromacademiccontributions,technicalreports,
courtrecords,parliamentarysubmissionsandgovernmentdocumentsthroughoutthe
researchprocess.Notallofthesematerialswereeasilyaccessible;insomeinstances,theright
‘gate-keeper’hadtobefound.Unlesswrittenpermissionwasreceivedtoreferencethe
materials,confidentialdocumentsweretreatedasbackgroundinformation.Technicalreports,
arrestandconvictiondatabases,courtfiles,CITESdocumentation,newspaperreportsandop-
edcontributionsprovidedusefulinsightastohowactorsperceiveandframethe‘rhino
problem’.Someinformationwasintegratedintothedissertation;theremainderservedas
backgroundinformationtopreparefortheinterviewingprocess.
(b) ArchivalresearchAttemptsweremadetogainaccesstoevidencegivenatthe“KumlebenCommissionof
InquiryintotheAllegedSmugglingofandIllegalTradeinIvoryandRhinocerosHorninSouth
Africa”.In1994,formerSouthAfricanPresidentNelsonMandelaappointedJusticeKumleben
toinvestigatetheinvolvementoftheSouthAfricanDefenceForceintheillicittradeofrhino
hornandivoryduringthebushwarsinAngola,NamibiaandMozambique.Unfortunately,my
attemptswereunsuccessful.Theoriginalmaterials(suchaseyewitnesstestimony)hadbeen
movedfromthestatearchivestoanundisclosedrepository.Kumleben’sfinalreporthasbeen
scannedandisaccessibleon-line.Thereportwasregardedawhitewashbysome(Interviews,
2013and2014)asallegationsremainedunsubstantiatedandimportantwitnessesfailedto
appearinfrontoftheCommission,leadingtonosuccessfulprosecutions.Isupplemented
potentialknowledgegapsbyinterviewinginformants,whohadintimateknowledgeofthe
proceedingsandfindings.
IalsovisitedthearchivesoftheKrugerNationalParkinSkukuza,whereIaccessedreportsand
articlesthatdealtwithrhinosandthehistoryofthePark.Whilerhinopoachingwasmy
principalinterest,Icastthenetwiderinordertosituatetherhinoissuewithinthebroader
85
socialandpoliticalcontextoftheParkanditsdevelopment.Theworld’smostcomprehensive
on–linearchiveofknowledgeonrhinos,theRhinoResourceCentre78andJulianRademeyer’s
KillingforProfitarchive79wereusefulinaccessingup-to-dateinformationonrhinoissues.
(c) Web2.0researchWeb2.0refersto‘bigdata’(boyd/Crawford2012)or‘user–generatedcontent’onthe
Internet(Snee2008:3).TheuseofWeb2.0technologiesforthepurposesofsocialresearchis
initsinfancy.Somescholarsquestiontheusefulness(boyd/Crawford2012;Bollier2010;
Anderson2008);othersfearthatsocialscientistsmaybeleftbehindinthebravenewworld
ofsocialmediaplatforms(Savage/Burrows2007;Snee2008;Murthy2008;Robinson/Schulz
2009).Ifhistoryisanythingtogoby(theuseoftaperecordingtechnologiesinthe1950s
providedaboneofcontentioninresearchcommunities),thentheinitialtrepidationwillblow
overbytheendofthedecade.80
SocialnetworkssuchasFacebook,TwitterandLinkedInarebuiltupontheprincipleof
establishingnetworksthroughfriendsandcompoundrelations(Murthy2008:844).Murthy
(2008:845)arguesthatsuchnetworkswouldbeusefultoresearchersbecausetheyactas
“virtualgatekeepers”tochainsoffriends,whocanactasresearchinformantsormayhave
connectionstopersonsofinterest.IusedFacebook,LinkedIn,andblogsforthepurposesof
identifyingresearchinformants,researchassistants,transcribersandinterpreters,engagedin
on-linedebatesandaccesseddocumentsandmulti-mediaresources.Whilesome
78DrKeesRookmaakeristheeditorofthearchive,whichcanbeaccessedathttp://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/.79ThearchivewasstartedbyinvestigativejournalistandauthorJulianRademeyerandcanbeaccessedathttp://killingforprofit.com/.80ComputeraccessandthespreadofInternettechnologieshaveledtoawiderrangeofentitiessuchasmarketingcompanies,governmentagenciesandmotivatedindividualstogenerate,analyze,organizeandsharedata.SavageandBurrows(2007)warnofacrisisinempiricalsociologyduetodatasetspreviouslyintheexclusivedomainofsocialscientists“nowbeingaggregatedandmadeeasilyaccessibletoanyonewhoiscurious,regardlessoftheirtraining”(boyd/Crawford2012:664).Regardlessofthetypeoftrainingreceivedbythedatagenerator,alldatasetsshouldbeequallyscrutinizedforpossiblebiasandputincontext(e.g.Whoisbehindtheresearch?Whoisfundingit?Whatistheobjective?).ForthepurposesofdatacollectionontheInternet,alldatawasscrutinizedandtriangulated.
86
ethnographicresearchershidebehindpseudonymsandavatarsinon-lineplatforms
(boyd/Crawford2012:672),Iusedmyfullnameanddisclosedmyresearchinterestwhile
engagingon-line.I‘met’severalinformantson-line,whichledtointerviewsintherealworld.
ThesesocialmediaportalsprovedparticularlyusefulwhenIpreparedforfieldworkinHong
KongandVietnam,researchsitesthatIhadnotvisitedbefore.Throughtheon–line
accommodationserviceAirBnB,Imanagedtofindaffordablelodgingwithlocalsacross
Vietnam,whichgavemealocalfootholdandunexpectedaccesstoinvaluableresearch
informants.On-linefriendsandconnectionsprovidedintroductionstotheirsocialand
professionalnetworksinMozambique,HongKong,andVietnam,manyofwhomImetinface-
to-faceinterviewsandsocialgatherings.
Socialnetworksitesholdvaststoresofmultimedia-resources“regardingeventhemost
marginalsocialmovementsorgroups”(Murthy2008:845).Therhinohasmostcertainlyan
enormoussocialmediapresence.FacebookgroupslikeTheGreatBigNOTrade/PROTrade
Debate,81FocusAfricaFoundation,82OutragedSACitizensagainstPoaching,83RhinoNews,84
RhinoS.O.S./WildandFreeSA,85personalblogs86andtheFacebookandTwitterpagesof
conservationNGOs,Anti-PoachingUnits(APUs)andIntergovernmentalOrganizations(IGOs)
provideusefullinkstodocumentsanddatabases,newsreportsandinsightsastohowthe
rhinoproblemisframedinpublicdiscourse.Severalhardtofindpolicypapersandreports
were‘crowd-sourced’fromsuchplatforms.Moreover,‘on-lineobservation’wasconductedin
81Accessibleathttps://www.facebook.com/groups/RhinoTradeDebate/82Accessibleathttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Focus-Africa-Foundation/640463866006417?fref=nf83Accessibleathttps://www.facebook.com/groups/OSCAP/84Accessibleathttps://www.facebook.com/groups/506340646046722/85Accessibleathttps://www.facebook.com/groups/rhinosos/andhttps://www.facebook.com/groups/WILDANDFREESA/?fref=ts.TheWildandFreeSAgrouphadreplacedRhinoS.O.S.,whichwastheoperationalgroupwhenIundertookscopingresearchfortheproject.86ThepersonalblogofBrianSandbergisagreatexampleofthought-provokingideasbeingsharedviasocialmedia.Brianfrequentlypublishedonrhino–relatedmattersonhispersonalblog(https://vivaafrika.wordpress.com/).IcontactedhimuponreadingablogaboutthevillagesontheMozambicanborderoftheKrugerNationalParkandthevillagers’linkstorhinopoaching.Weconnectedovercoffeeafewdayslater.Unfortunately,BrianpassedawayinApril2014.
87
virtualmarketplaces87,whererhinohornandotherwildlifecontrabandweretraded.Ialso
accessedtheDeepnet(alsoknownastheDarknetorHiddenWeb)throughtheanonymity
networkTortocastthenetwiderandassessopportunitystructuresaccessibletocriminal
players.
Thesenewtechnologiesarenotonlygeneratingnewkindsofdataandgrantingaccessto
difficulttoreachpopulations,buttheycarrywiththemethicalandmethodologicalchallenges
(McKie/Ryan2012:5).Firstly,thereareethicalconcernstiedtoprivacy88–someFacebook
updates,tweetsorchat-roomramblingswerecreatedin“highly-contextsensitivespaces”,
theoriginatorsthusmaynotconsenttotheirdatabeingusedelsewhere(boyd/Crawford
2012:673).89SallyHambridge,developerofthe“NetiquetteGuidelines”(citedin:Ess/AoIR
EthicsWorkingCommittee2002:5)qualifiestheopennessofcommunicationbywarningthat
notevenemailcorrespondenceissafefrompryingeyes:
“Unlessyouareusinganencryptiondevice(hardwareorsoftware),youshouldassumethatmailontheInternetisnotsecure.Neverputinamailmessageanythingyouwouldnotputonapostcard.”90
Iusedcommonsensetojudgewhethertheinteractionsofsocialmediauserswereintended
aspublicand“performative”(Ess/AoIREthicsWorkingCommittee2002:7)orprivateand
protected.Anonymity,protectionofconfidentialityandinformedconsentguideddata
87Usingacrimescriptanalysisapproach,Lavorgna(2014)arguesthattheInternetisnotonlyacommunicationtoolforwildlifetraffickersbuthasalsotransformedthestructureofthecriminalwildlifemarketbyloweringbarrierstoentry.Asianinformantslikewisesuggestedthaton-linemarketplaces,socialnetworkplatformsandauctionwebsitesofferrhinohorninvariousforms(TCM,carvings,unprocessedhorn).MyVietnameseresearchassistantintroducedmetoseveralauctionwebsites,whichostensiblysoldrhinohornproducts.However,criminalinvestigatorsstatedthatrhinohorntradedon-lineismostlyfake(Interviewwithorganizedcrimeexperts,Bangkok,HanoiandHongKong,2013).Severalon-lineauctionandmarketplaceshavebeenshutdown(suchastheformerwww.kerwawa.com),andlistingsonseveralreputableauctionwebsiteshavebeenflagged,reportedanddeleted.MyempiricalinvestigationcouldonlypartiallyconfirmLavorgna’sthesis–thepartoftheInternetbeingusedasacommunicationtool(seechapter8);however,interviewswithrhinohornconsumersrevealedthattheyreliedonpersonalintroductionsandword-by-mouthreferralstoreputablehornsellers.88Theon-goingrevelationstiedtotheNationalSecurityAgency(NSA)scandalhaveshonealightonhowsocialmediaplatformsareusedforintelligencegatheringpurposes.89UnbeknownsttomanyInternetusers,deletinganupdate,tweetorcommentmayremoveitfromone’scomputerscreenwhileback-ups,mirrorimagesandscreenshotsmayremainincirculationlongafter.90Availableathttp://www.pcplayer.dk/Netikette_reference.doc
88
collectionthroughouttheresearchprocess.Inreturn,somesocialnetworkersrequested
assistancewithspecifictasks,suchasreferralstotherelevantliteraturesupportingtheir
stancefororagainstthelegalizationofthetradeinrhinohorn,inputintomoviescriptsand
op–edpieces,orintroductionstosourcesofinformation.91Iassistedwiththerequestsaslong
astheydidnotclashwithmyresearchethicsandtimeconstraints.
Secondly,administratorsofsocialmediainterfaceshavethepowerofthe“delete”button.In
otherwords,on-linecontentsisoftencensored,mediatedandcondensedasnottoupsetthe
mainstreamorcatchtheattentionoflawenforcementandintelligencebodies.Insomecases,
socialmediauserspracticeself-censorshipanddeletetheircommentsuponreceiving
negativesanctioningfromothers.Ihaveoftenwatchedcomments‘disappear’frommylaptop
screen;theseincludeamongstothers,racistremarks,personalattacksaimedatfellowusers
anddeaththreatstopoachersorAsiannationals.The“newdigitaldivide”(boyd/Crawford
2012:673)presentsanotherlimitationbecauseofthegrowingriftbetweenthemostlyurban
wealthystrataofsocietywithhigh-speedInternetaccessanddatavolumesandtheless
fortunateones(ofteninruralsettings)whocannotaffordaccessoruserestrictedwireless
accesstoconnecttotheInternet.Arguably,accesstosocialmediaislargelylimitedtothe
“digitalhaves”while“ethnic/genderdigitaldividesstronglypersist”(Murthy2008:845).
Consciouseffortsweremadetocontact‘digitalhave-nots’anddifficulttoreachpopulations
inthe‘real’world.
2.4.2Fieldwork
Fieldworkreferstoprimaryresearch“thattranspires‘inthefield’…outsidethecontrolled
settingsofthelibraryorlaboratory”(McCall2006:3).Thedurationofthefieldwork
componentstretchedover14monthsandentailedtwophases.Duringtheinitialexploratory
phase,thecasestudyandkeyexpertswereidentified(andinterviewedtoinformtheresearch
approach)andtheresearchsitesweredetermined.Ialsoinitiatedtheprocessofobtaining
researchpermissiontoundertakeresearchinSouthAfrica’snationalparksandcorrectional
91Anumberofjournalistsrequestedcontactdataofrhinocriminals.Forreasonsofanonymity,confidentialityandsafety,thecontactdatawasnotshared.
89
centres(prisons),aswellaswithofficialsfromlawenforcementagenciesandgovernment
departments.Thesecondphaseinvolved12–monthsofimmersedfieldworkinsouthern
AfricaandSoutheastAsia.Thetimingoffieldtripswaslargelyflexible,contingentonthe
availabilityofinformantsandweatherconditions,92andschedulednottocoincidewith
electionsormajorholidays.
Ivisitedseveralresearchsitesmorethanonce,whichallowedtimetoestablishtrustand
rapportwithinformants.Duetothegeographicscopeandtheremotenessofmostresearch
sitesinsouthernAfrica,Iusedcarsandtookoccasionalflightstogetaround.InSoutheast
Asia,Iusedpublictransportation(trains,ferries,busandmotorbikes).MyhometownofCape
TownintheWesternCaperegionofSouthAfricawasthebasefromwhereIembarkedon
immersedfieldtrips(seeAppendixAforadetailedlistofresearchsitesandmaps).Imadepit
stopsatseveralprivategamereservesandrhinofarms,informalsettlementsandvillagesin
thevicinityofconservationareas,aswellasformalandunofficialbordercrossings.Interviews
andfocusgroupswerefrequentlyarrangedawayfromtherespondent’splaceofworkor
officetoencourageanopenandinformalapproach.
WhileIcouldvisitallmajorrhinopoachinghot–spots,criticalthinkingandplanningwere
investedinthe“places”ofresearch.Beyondthephysicalpropertiessuchasthedemarcation
ofboundaries,“figurative”and“metaphorical”aspectswerealsorelevant(Stein2006:61).
Theidentificationofdividedgeographiesandcontestedspacesbecameanimportantaspect
ofattributingmeaningandcontext.
92Duetotheheightenedriskofflooding(leadingtoimpassableroads),malariainfectionandextremelyhotandhumidweatherconditions,itisnotadvisabletotraveltoMozambiqueandtheKNPduringtherainyseason(DecembertoFebruary).IwasalsocautionedtoavoidtravelingtoSoutheastAsiaduringthesouthernsummermonsoonseason.Mooncycleswerealsoimportantconsiderationsaspoachingusedtosurgearoundfullmoon.Poachersusethenaturalmoonlighttoguidethemthroughthebushatnight.Theroleoflunarphaseshasbecomelessimportantduethegreatnumberofpoachingteamsandincursionsoccurringatalltimesofdayandnight.
90
(a) Interviews
Researchinformantswereinterviewedinface-to-facesemi-structuredorunstructured
interviews.Researchinterviewsare“professionalconversations”aboutsociallife,uponwhich
“knowledgeisconstructedintheinteractionbetweentheinterviewerandtheinterviewee”
(Kvale/Brinkmann2009:4).Beforediscussingsampling(whichisalsorelevanttosub-section
(e),whichdealswithfocusgroups),anoverviewoftheinterviewingapproachandprocessis
given.
Theapproachtakenwasoneofsteppingbackand“relinquish(ing)expertstatus”(Simpson
2006:126),listeningtorespondents’lifestories,insightsandascribedmeaningsofillegal
economicactioninvolvingrhinohorn.Thistypeof“responsiveinterview”isusefulineliciting
responsesasitunderscores“theimportanceofbuildingarelationshipoftrustbetweenthe
interviewerandintervieweethatleadstomoregive-and-takeinconversation”(Rubin/Rubin
2012:37).Greatcarewastakentoprovideaninterviewsettingthatwasinformalandrelaxed;
thequestionswereflexible,open-endedand“evolvedinresponsetowhattheinterviewees
havesaid,andnewquestionsweredesignedtotaptheexperienceandknowledgeofeach
interviewee”(Rubin/Rubin2012:37).Oncethesubjectofillegality(forexample:involvement
inpoaching)wasbroached,Ierredonthesideofcautionwhenitcametoaskingfollow-up
questionsorprobingfurther(Flick[1998]2014:208).Duetothepossibilityofinterviewer
effects,93concertedeffortsweremadetoavoid“prompting”respondentstoproducean
answer(Fielding/Thomas:250).Attemptsweremadetodiscourageinformantsfrom
anticipatingtheresponsetheythoughtIwasseeking.Tominimizerespondenteffects
(irreducibleambiguityofquestionsduetodifferentbackgroundsoftheresearcherandthe
researched),localinterpreterswereemployedtohelpexplainquestionsratherthanthe
researchertickingoffquestionsinapredeterminedquestionnaire(Burawoy1998:12).
Researchintosensitiveissuestendstoengenderresistanceamongstthoseintervieweddueto
feelingsofshame,fearofreprisalsandotherconsequenceslinkedtocontinuityinwork–
basedrelationships.Basedonpreviousfieldworkexperience,theuseofcontroversial
terminologyor‘loadedterms’suchascorruptionwashencesidesteppedbydescribingthe
93Personalattributesoftheinterviewer(suchasgender,ethnicityorreligion)ortheinterviewschedule(orderorformofquestions)–so-calledintervieweffects–canimpacttheinterview(issuesofpositionalityoftheresearcherwillbediscussedinthefinalsectionofthischapter).
91
conceptinlooseterms(Hübschle/VanderSpuy2012:326).Theassuranceofconfidentiality
andanonymityinandbeyondthefieldwascrucialtoobtainingdatathatdelvedbeyond
standardone-lineresponses.
Attemptsweremadetointerviewrespondentsmorethanonce.Thefirstinterviewwasused
toestablishrapportwiththeinformant(s)andfollow–upinterviewswouldservethepurpose
ofdatacollectionandverification.Inlightofthegeographicalscope,timeandinstitutional
constraintsofthestudy,thiswasnotalwayspossible.Theresearchpermitstoundertakedata
collectioninthenationalparks,andcorrectionalcentreswereapprovedandprocessed
halfwaythroughtheresearchprocessanddemandedfurtherlogisticalpreparations.
Unfortunately,inthisinstancerespondentscouldonlybeinterviewedonce.However,follow-
upphonecallsandemailsweremadeto‘keepintouch’andverifyinformationwithmany
respondentsbeyondtheinitialinterviewprocess.
Keyinformantsprovidedintroductionstotheirprofessionalnetworks,actingasgatekeepers.
Throughtheinterviewsconductedintheinitialexploratoryphase,Iestablishedrelationships,
whichIcultivatedthroughouttheresearch.Conservators,investigators,officialsand
communityleadersareimportant‘gatekeepers’,whoprovidedintroductionstotheir
professionalandsocialnetworks.Moreover,purposivesamplingwasemployedtotarget
specificpersonsofinterestasameansofassistingwithfillinggapsinthedataand
contributingtowardstheorybuilding(Gray2009:152).Iusedsnowballsamplingtorecruit
otherrespondentsthroughpre-existingsocialandprofessionalnetworks.Typically,the
samplegroupgrowsovertime(likeasnowball)untilenoughdataisgatheredtosatisfythe
researchobjective.Thistechniqueisparticularlyusefulforaccessingdatafromhidden
populations–suchaskingpins,smugglersorpoachers–wheregroupmembershipmaybe
concealedduetotheillegalnatureoftheactivity.Moreover,snowballingcanbeusedto
accessmarginalizedcommunities,liketheruraldwellersinterviewedintheMozambican
borderlands.Thetechniquereliesheavilyonpersonalrecommendationsthat“vouchforthe
legitimacyoftheresearcher”(Sturgis2011:180).Itallowsresearcherstogainaccessand
informationastrustisbuiltamongsthiddenand/ormarginalizedpopulations.Theprocessof
securingentryintoagivensocialnetworkallowsresearcherstounderstandtheinter-group
relationships,hierarchies,andconnectionsbetweenparticipants.Whileitisacknowledged
92
thatsnowballsamplingisinexact(Miller2005:69),itcanofferusefulinsightsintoillegalor
marginalsectorsprovidedthedataisverifiedortriangulated.416interviews(includingfocus
groups)wereconductedduringthisresearch.Thisincludes360face-to-faceinterviewswith
respondents,someofwhomwereinterviewedmorethanonce.Inlightofconfidentialityand
anonymityrequirements,twogeneraltablesofinformants,theirrolewithintherhinosupply
chainandabreakdownbyregionaregiven.Table2liststhefieldofexpertiseofresearch
informants.
Table2:Numberofrespondentsbyfunction
Function NumberofrespondentsPrisoners94 30Criminalactors95 38Community96 43Conservation97 47Lawenforcement&intelligence(public)98
46
Privatesecurity&intelligence99 25Wildlifeindustry100 29Academia 34Journalism 21Socialmovement101 47Total: 360
94Forallintentsandpurposes,the‘prisoner’categorycouldbesubsumedunder‘criminalactors’.Thepurposeofseparatingthetwoservestoindicatethatboth,activeandconvictedrhinocriminals,wereinterviewed.95Poachers,kingpins,traders,corruptofficials,roguewildlifeindustryactorsandconsumersareconsideredinthiscategory.96Criminalactorsareembeddedincommunitystructures.Itwasthusimportanttointerviewcommunitymembersdirectlyaffectedbyillegaltrade.Typically,suchrespondentswouldprovidethebroadersocietalcontextofthestudy.97Acleardelineationwasmadebetweenconservatorsandrespondentsrepresentingsocialmovementsorspecialinterestgroups.Theprimaryfunctionofconservatorsislinkedtonatureconservation.Respondentsinthiscategoryworkinparksorcarryoutofficialdutieslinkedtoconservation.98Thiscategoryincludesstate-runpolice,military,customsandprosecutorialagencies.99Privateanti-poachingunits,intelligencegatherersandprivateinvestigatorsareincluded.100Thiscategoryincludespeoplethatareprofessionallylinkedtotherhinohornexchangesuchaswildlifeveterinarians,professionalhunters,gamecapturersandwildlifeinsurancebrokers.101Representativesofcharities,NGOsandothercivilsocietyorganizationswereinterviewed.
93
Insomeinstances,thecategorizationwasnotstraightforward.Acriminalactor,forexample,
mayalsofitthecommunity,conservationorlawenforcementcategory.Thesalient
categorizationrelevanttotheresearchquestionwaschoseninsuchcases.
Table3providesanoverviewofrespondentsbyregion.Themajorityofrespondentshailfrom
eitherSub-SaharanAfricaorSoutheastAsia.Thecategorizationreliesontheknowledgebase
andcontextoftherespondent.Forexample,someAsianrespondentswereinterviewedin
SouthAfricaandMozambique.Astheinterpretationoftheirdataisrelevanttounderstanding
theAsiandimensionsofthesupplychain,theyfallunderthe“Asia”category.
Table3:Respondentsbyregion
Region NumberofrespondentsSub–SaharanAfrica 239Asia 102Australia 5Europe 10NorthAmerica 4 360
Qualitativestudiesseldomencompassabigsample;thepresentstudyisthusunusual.
Critiquesofcasestudies,snowballingandpurposivesamplingtechniquesfaultthelackof
adherencetostandardsofrepresentativenessandthusgeneralizability(Miller2005:70).
Whilecognizantofsuchcritiques,thebigsizeofthissampleisattributabletotheillegalityof
therhinohornexchange,therelateddifficultyofnegotiatingaccessto‘experts’(rhino
criminals),andmostimportantly,theimportanceassignedtodataverification.Insome
instances,thetrustofgatekeepersortheproverbial‘footinthedoor’hadtobenegotiated
overaseriesofinterviewswithseveraldifferentrespondents.Inotherinstances,ittookafew
interviewsuntilintroductionstothe‘rightperson’weremade.Unstructuredinformal
interviewswereconductedwhentheopportunityarosetospeaktoofficials“offtherecord”
afterworkshopsorformalmeetings.Sometimesimpromptuinterviewsdevelopedat
researchsiteswithinformantsfromunexpectedcorners,suchaspatientswaitingtoseea
TCMdoctororpeoplegoingabouteverydaybusiness.Thelengthofinterviewsvariedfrom10
94
minutestocloseto5hours,averagingatapproximately2hoursperinterview.Theresearch
projectbenefittedgreatlyfromrespondents’goodwill,time,andtrust.
Theneedfordatatriangulationandverificationgrewascollecteddatastarteddivergingfrom
insightsfoundintheliteratureordifferedfromofficialpositionstakenbygatekeepersor
socialcontrolagents.Whilefact-checkingconstitutedoneresearchstrategy,equally
importantwastherequirementtoestablishthe“sociologicalpertinenceandanalytical
adequacyforexplainingthesocialpractices”ofrespondents(Waquant2002:1481).During
theinterviewingprocess,itprovedimportanttoreflectonwhowasbeinginterviewed,their
roleinthecommunityandsociety,andintherhinohornsupplychain.Moreover,I
interrogatedtheprocessandimplicationsof‘othering’,102leadingto“alienationandsocial
distance”betweenkeyactorsand‘supportingroles’(Krumer-Nevo/Sidi2012:300).Earlyin
theresearchphase,thefluidinterfacebetweenillegalityandlegalitywasrecognized.For
example,theambiguousroleofsocialcontrolagentsandbigbusinesswasdulyincludedand
researched.
(b) Focusgroups
Focusgroupswerearrangedwithvillagers,conservation,lawenforcementandgovernment
officials.Gatekeepersandkeyinformantsinitiatedsomefocusgroups;Iorganizedtheothers.
Insomeinstances,focusgroupsconstitutedthefollow-upinteractionofone-on-one
interviewsactivelysoughtoutbyrespondentswhopreferredagroupsetting.Onother
occasions,focusgroupsandmeetingsprovidedthespringboardforone-on-oneexchanges
lateron.BarbourandKitzinger(1999:4–5)regardasfocusgroup“anygroupdiscussion…as
longastheresearcherisactivelyencouragingandattentiveto,thegroupinteraction”.What
differentiatesfocusgroupsfromplaingroupinterviewsisthe“explicituseofgroup
interactiontogeneratedata”(Kitzinger/Barbour1999:4).Thesizeoffocusgroupsranged
102Iusethesociologicalunderstandingoftheconceptof‘othering’,whichrefersto“theprocessofattachingmoralcodesofinferioritytodifference”(Krumer-Nevo/Sidi2012:300).Krumer-NevoandSidi(ibid)identifyobjectification,de-contextualization,de-historicization,andde-authorizationasotheringmechanismsemployedwithregardstowomenlivinginpoverty.
95
fromthreetoeightparticipants.Focusgroupinteractionsprovedparticularlyusefulin
encouragingpeopletotalkfreelyabouttheimpact,drawbacksandbenefitsofpoachingto
thecommunity,governmentpolicyandactionandsensitivetopicssuchaspublicsector
corruption.
Michel(1999:36)warnsthatwhilefocusgroupsareusefulfortheidentificationofcollective
experiencesandsharedidentities,theymaysilencethevoicesofparticipantslowerinthe
social“peckingorder”(especiallywhenon-goingsocialrelationsmaybeaffectedbypublic
disclosure).Contrarytothiswarning,scholarsfromthefeministtraditionhavefoundthat
respondentsweremorelikelyto“self-discloseorsharepersonalexperiencesinagroup
settingthanindyadicsettings”duetofeeling“empoweredandsupportedinagroupsetting”
(Faraquhar/Das)1999:47).Theresearcher’sidentityandlinkedasymmetricpowerrelations
duetorace,genderandagemay,however,amplifythesensitivityoftheresearchtopic.The
presenceofayoungish103whitewomaninfluencedtheprocessofdatacollectionandwillbe
furtherproblematizedinthefinalsection.Focusgroupshelpedtoleveltheplayingfield,as
somerespondentsexpressedcomfortofbeingsurroundedbymembersoftheirpeergroupor
supportstructures.Assuranceofconfidentialityandanonymitywasparticularlyimportantfor
focusgroupsettings.
(c) ParticipantobservationParticipantobservationassistedinunderstandingandinterpretingtheresearchcontextand
howactorsinteractwithinagivenenvironment.Itinvolves“thesystematicviewingof
people’sactionsandtherecording,analysisandinterpretationoftheirbehaviour”(Gray2009:
397).Observationisintegraltomostqualitativeresearcher’stoolboxand,liketheother
methodsemployedcarriesethicalandsecurityconcernsparticularlywhereitinvolvesillegal
activities.Whiletheresearcherobservesthefield,shealsoinfluenceswhatsheisobserving
duetoherparticipation(Flick[1998]2014:312).Covertobservation(whenpeopledonot
knowthattheyarebeingobserved)isfavouredwhenthevalidityoftheresearchresultsmight
103Iwasinmymid-30sduringtheperiodofactivefieldwork.
96
beinfluencedbypriorknowledgeoftheobservation.However,thisformofobservationis
ethicallyquestionableandfallsshortofspyingonothers.
Forthisproject,overtandinvitedparticipantobservationwasthepreferredmethod,which
included,amongstothers:accompanyinginvestigatorstocrimesceneinvestigations;visiting
thefencelinebetweenKrugerNationalParkandprivateconcessionsontheMozambican
side;anti–poachingpatrols;consultationswithTCMdoctors;rhinohornconsumptionandthe
observationoforganizationalandinstitutionalprocessesingovernmentdepartments,law
enforcementagencies,anti-poachingunits,conservationNGOsandIGOs.Duetosecurity
concerns,observationsatsomesitesremainedunannounced,suchasvisitstothemedicines
streetsanddistrictsofHongKong,Hanoi,CatBaandHoChiMinhCity;TCMparaphernalia
stallsandshopsinHanoi,HoChiMinhCityandBatThienh;TCMwholesalersinHanoi;and
observationsofvillagelifeinbordertownsandvillagesinMozambique.Theseobservations
assistedincontextualizingthesocialsettingandthelevelofembeddednessofcriminalactors,
theinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegality,interactionsbetweenrespondents,howthey
carriedthemselvesintheirdailyroutines,andbehavedintheirinteractionswiththestate.
Beyondthelistedobservations,observationaltechniqueswereusedtodeterminethe
credibilityofrespondents(Becker1958:654),whetherrespondentsvolunteeredordirected
information(Becker1958:655)andthesignificanceofbodylanguageofrespondentsinthe
interview,meetingoreverydaysocialsettings.Itisdifficulttocategorizesuchobservations
andusethemasevidentiaryprooffortheoreticalconclusions(Becker1958:666).To
compensateforthisdeficiency,theempiricalsectionsofthisdissertationrelyon‘thick
narratives’andtriangulationofdataandmethods.Theuseofthicknarrativeconveysthe
richnessofthedatacollectedduringthisproject.
(d) Participationinmeetings
Theopportunitytoparticipateinmeetings,workshopsandroundtablediscussionsdealing
withrhino-relatedmatterscontributedgreatlytounderstandingandcontextualizingpolicy
matters.Thisalsoprovidedtheopportunitytonetworkwithkeystakeholders,leadingto
follow-upinterviewsorintroductionstoimportantgatekeepers.Particularlyusefulwere
97
invitationstopresenttheobjectivesofthisresearchprojecttotheSouthAfricanNational
BiodiversityInvestigators’Forum,theDPCI(DepartmentofPriorityCrimeInvestigationsin
SouthAfrica),andstakeholdersoftheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierConservationArea,aswell
asmembersofthePolicingStudiesForumattheUniversityofHongKong.Othermeetings
(suchasattendingtheannualcongressofWildlifeRanchingSouthAfrica,anawarenessraising
campaignundertakenbytheCITESScientificAuthorityataprimaryschoolinHanoior
meetingsofprivaterhinoowners)werelessformalbutequallyinformativeandprovided
insightsonstakeholder’sperceptionsoftherhinoissue.
2.5Triangulationanddataanalysis
Theresearchdesignofmulti-sitedethnographyfacilitatedthegarneringofinsightsand
perspectivesfromdifferentactorsandplacesalongrhinohornflows,allowingfor
juxtapositionandcomparison.Qualitativedataanalysishasbeencriticizedduetosupposed
lackof“methodologicalrigour”,biasduetoresearchersubjectivity,thesmallnessofcases,as
wellas“limitedevidence”toinformempiricalandtheoreticalconclusions(Gray2009:493).
Earliersectionsofthischapterservedtoshowthata“rigorousandlogicalprocess”(ibid)was
followedinattachingmeaningandsubsequentanalysistothecollecteddata.Moreover,
multiplequalitativemethodswereadoptedasastrategytopromotescientificrigour.The
originalideabehindtheso-calledmethodoftriangulationwastoinstitutemeasurement
practicesinsocialandbehaviouralresearch.Triangulationservesasaresearchstrategy“to
comparetheevidencecollectedfromdifferentsourcestobetterunderstandthebiasesor
omissionsofeachandtoproduceamorecomprehensiveviewofthesocialphenomena”
(Espeland2005).Italsoreferstotheuseofdifferentdatasources(suchasstudying
phenomenaatdifferenttimes,indifferentplaces,aswellasgatheringdatafromdifferent
people),theuseofdifferentinterviewersand/ortheuseofmultipleperspectivesand
hypothesestogeneratetheories(Flick[1998]2014:183).104AccordingtoFlick([1998]2014),
104Denzin(1970)differentiatesbetweendata,investigator,theoreticalandmethodologicaltriangulation.ForthepurposesofPh.D.research,theuseofseveralinvestigatorswouldbeconstruedascheating.Nonetheless,
98
triangulationisnotastrategyortooltotestdatavaliditybutservesasanalternativeto
validation.Iuseddifferenttypesandsourcesofdata,approximatingfact-checkingundertaken
byinvestigativejournaliststoverifyinformationandsources(Espeland2005:66),105aswellas
multiplemethodsofdatacollection.Inaddition,theconsiderablenumberofresearch
informants,aswellassnowballandpurposivesamplingledtoheterogeneityoftheoverall
sampleandensuredthathiddenpopulationsreceivedavoice.Thus,theblendofmultiple
methods,empiricalmaterialsandperspectivesadded“rigour,breadthcomplexity,richness,
anddepth”(Denzin2012:82)tothestudy.
Forthepurposesofanalysis,dataemanatingfrombothfieldworkanddesktopresearchwere
analysedthroughoutthedatacollectionphase.Theprocesscontinuedoncetheactive
fieldworkphasehadended.Fieldnotes,audiorecordingsanddocumentsmadeuptheraw
data.Throughoutthedatacollectionprocess,extensivefieldnotesofinterviewsand
observationswerecreated.Interviewswererecorded,dependentontheconsentofthe
researchinformant.106ThetranscribingservicesofnativespeakersofShangaan/Tsonga107and
Vietnamesewereemployedforinterviewsthatwereconductedinlanguagesnotknownto
theresearcher.Localresearchassistantswereaskedtodoinsitutranslationsinthefield.It
washopedthatthetranscriberswouldcatchdetailsthatmayhavebeen‘lostintranslation’in
thefield.Theinterviewsweretranscribed,re-checkedforaccuracy,anonymizedandstoredin
secureandencryptedfolders.Relevantnewspaperarticles,policydocumentsandacademic
articleswerecollectedthroughouttheprojectandinsertedintoaself-deviseddatabaseonmy
laptop.Ialsocreatedmemostoreflectonthought-provokingaspectsofthedata,which
providedthebasisfordeeperanalysis(Miles/Huberman1994:44).
Whileinitialdataanalysisandthedevelopmentoftheconceptualframeworkweredone
collaborativeprojectsusingmorethanoneresearcherareusefulnotonlyfortriangulation,butcouldalsodealwithissuesofpositionalityandrelatedbiases.105Investigativejournalistsusuallyconfirmasetofinformationthroughthreeindependentsources.106Recordingwasnotalwayspossibleduetothesensitivityofthesubjectmatterandtherequestbyrespondentsnottoberecorded.107TsongaandShangaanarelocallanguagesspokenbymanypeoplelivingadjacenttotheKNPonbothsidesoftheborder.Thetwolanguagesaresimilar.
99
manually,theNVivodataanalysissoftwarewasusedinthelaterstages.Opencodingallowed
forthedevelopmentofcodesthatcapturedtheessenceof‘new’theoreticalideasand
meaningsofdatathatcouldnotbeintegratedintopreconceivedcodessuchasthenotionof
contestedillegalityandthecoordinationproblemofsecurity.Thisallowedthedata“tospeak
forthemselves”(Glaser/Strauss1967:101).Ofimportancewastheapplicationoftheoretical
ratherthandescriptivecodes,whichIdevelopedthroughprimarydatacollection.Moreover,
theviewsofrespondentswereverified,criticallyassessedandinterpretedintheprocess
(Gibbs2007:54–55).Data-drivencodingwassupplementedwithconcept-drivencoding
derivedfrompreviousstudiesintheliterature,topicscoveredduringtheinterviewprocess
andhunches(Gibbs2007:44–45).Framesandframingprocesseswerealsoconsideredduring
theanalysisofbothprimaryandsecondarydata.Goffman(1974:21)conceivedofthenotion
offramestodenote“schemataofinterpretation”,whichallowsindividuals“tolocate,
perceive,identifyandlabel”eventsintheireverydaylivesandthewidersocialsystem.He
arguesthataspeopleframethe“organizationoftheirexperience,theybuttress,and
perforce,self–fulfillingly”whichleadsthemto“developacorpusofcautionarytales,games,
riddles,experiments,newsystoriesandotherscenarioswhichelegantlyconfirmaframe–
relevantviewoftheworkingsoftheworld”(Goffman1974:563).Textswerescrutinizedfor
attributionofcausality,blameanddelineationbetween‘good’and‘evil’(adversarialframing)
(Schwellnus2012).Formsofothering,differentiationbetweengoodversusbad(suchasthe
notionof“goodhunters”versus“badpoachers”)andculturalrelativistframeworkswere
significantelementsintheanalysisofcognitiveframes.
2.6Grayareasofsocialresearch:Researchethics
Whenresearchingthesocialworldandpeople,socialscientistsshouldconsidertheimpactof
theirresearchontheresearchparticipants,thesocialenvironment,andtheemotionaland
psychologicalimpactonthemselves.Thisresearchprojectfallsintothecategoryofwhat
SieberandStanley(:49)describeas“sociallysensitiveresearch”:
100
“Sociallysensitiveresearchreferstostudiesinwhichtherearepotentialsocialconsequencesorimplications,eitherdirectlyfortheparticipantsoftheresearchortheclassofindividualsrepresentedbytheresearch.”
Whilethepursuitofgreaterknowledgeislaudable,“respectforhumandignity”shouldbethe
guidingprincipleofsocialresearch(Bulmer2008:146).Intheaftermathofcontroversialsocial
sciencesexperimentssuchasthoseundertakenbyMilgram,ZimbardoandRosenhan,the
infamousProjectCamelot(David/Sutton2011:31–32)andsocialresearchinterpreted
througharacial,racistorideologicallensduringtheapartheidregimeinSouthAfrica
(Bless/Higson-Smith/Kagee2006:140–141),108theneedforanhonestengagementwith
ethicsofanysocialsciencesresearchhasbecomeaxiomatic.SieberandStanley(1988:50)list
fouraspectsofscientificactivitythatrequirescrutiny,including:“theformulationoftheories
orresearchquestions,theconductofresearchandthetreatmentofparticipants,the
institutionalsettinginwhichtheresearchisconducted,andtheinterpretationandapplication
oftheresearchfindings.”
AlthoughtheMaxPlanckSociety109endorsesfreedomofresearch,110restrictionsapply
concerningresearchthatundermines“othersignificantconstitutionallyprotectedvalues”
108TheCarnegieCorporationofNewYorkfundedthefirstmajorsociologicalstudyinSouthAfrica,whichdelvedintothepoorWhitesphenomenon(Welsh1981:28).Inits1932report,theCommissionrecommendedthattransitionaljobreservationshouldbeintroducedinordertoaddressthe“poor-Whiteproblem”(Webster1981:90).Noconsiderationwaspaidtotheproblemsofpoorblackpeople.Theresearchwasdesignedtoprofferideologiesofwhitesupremacyduringthecolonialera(Bless/Higson-Smith/Kagee2006:139).HendrikVerwoerd,theintellectualfatherofapartheid,startedhisdubiouscareerasasociologistattheUniversityofStellenbosch.HedeclaredthatblackSouthAfricansneededto“’administered’and‘properlyserviced’sothattheycanfunctionintheirprescribedrole”(Adam1981:119).Verwoerd’scareerandtheabuseofsocialresearchtofirmlyentrenchtheapartheidideologyisamatterofhistoricalrecord.Duringtheapartheidregime,manyquestionableresearchandscienceprogrammeswereintroducedandusedtoupholdthedominantCalvinistandracistapartheidideology.AnothernotoriousexampleisProjectCoast,thecovertchemicalandbiologicalwarfareprogrammeledbyWouterBasson,alsoknownas‘DoctorDeath’.Theprogrammeproducedandtestednarcoticdrugsandpoisonsfortheuseagainstanti-apartheidactivists(Singh,J.A.2008:5).ScoresofscientistscollaboratedonProjectCoast,whichalsoincludedaeugenicstrategytocontrolpopulationgrowthamongsttheblackpopulationbydevelopingaclandestineanti-fertilityvaccine.ThevaccinewasgoingtobeselectivelyadministeredtoblackSouthAfricans(Singh,J.A.2008:6);fortunately,theendofapartheidsubvertedtheseplans.ChandreGould(2002)arguesthatProjectCoastoffersimportantlessonsonwhyscientistsgetinvolvedinquestionableresearch,suchasprofessionalambition,thedesiretodointerestingscience,patriotismandfinancialgain.Between1960and1991,theSouthAfricanDefenceForcealsoimplementedaversiontherapyto‘heal’gaymenandlesbiansfromtheir‘deviant’sexualpreferences.Thisso-calledtherapyincludedforcedsexchangeoperations,chemicalsterilizationandelectricshocktreatments(Eybers2000;Kaplan2004).109TheMaxPlanckInstitutefortheStudyofSocieties(MPIfG)providedfinancial,administrativeandadvisoryassistanceforthisproject.TheMPIfGisoneof82researchinstitutesthatoperateundertheumbrellaoftheMaxPlanckSociety.
101
(MaxPlanckSociety2010:3).Italsoacknowledgesthedangerofmisappropriationof“neutral
orusefulperse”research“forharmfulpurposes”bythirdparties(ibid).111Allresearch
(includingthisresearchproject)conductedthroughinstitutesaffiliatedwiththeMaxPlanck
Societyaregovernedbystrictethicalandlegallimitations.112AnEthicsCommissionprovides
supporton“issuesofresearchethics,mediatesdifferencesofopinionbetweenresearchers
onrelevantmattersandissuesrecommendationsontheimplementationofresearch
projects”(MaxPlanckSociety2010:10).TheMaxPlanckSociety’sprinciplesofethically
responsibleresearchprovidedtheinstitutionalblueprinttonavigatingthroughethicalissues
duringtheproject.Inaddition,Ihadpreviousexperienceinundertakingfieldworkinto
human,drugandnaturalresourcetraffickingandbroaderorganizedcrimeissuesamongst
vulnerable,disenfranchisedandcriminalpopulationsinsouthernAfrica.Membersofthe
Ph.D.advisorycommittee,fellowresearchersandsociologists,aswellastherelevant
authorities(forexampletheresearchguideappointedbytheDepartmentofCorrectional
Services)advisedonspecificaspectssuchastheinterviewingprocessinprisons.
Manyethicalissueswereencounteredduringinceptionandinthecourseoftheresearch
project.Inthefollowingsubsections,issuesofanonymityandconfidentiality,informed
consent,powerdifferentialsbetweentheresearcherandrespondents,reciprocityand
securityconcernsarediscussed.
110Considerationsofwhatisethicalorunethicalinbroadersocietyinfluencethesuccessofresearchquestionsandproposals(David/Sutton2011:39).Rhinonarrativesarefraughtwithethicalconcerns,suchaswhethertoendorselegaltradeofakeratin-likesubstancewithlimitedprovenmedicaleffects,theuseofrhinohornformedicinalpurposes(cancercure),thehighervaluationofwildanimalsoverhumanbeings,callsforshoot-to-killenforcementagainstpoachers,orcultural-relativistassessmentsovertheuseofanimalproductsintraditionalmedicines.111TheKaiserWilhelmSociety,theMaxPlanckSociety’spredecessor,carriedoutunethicalexperimentsandresearchduringthenationalsocialistregimeinGermany.Thislegacyhasledtothedevelopmentofcomprehensiveguidelinesnotonlydealingwithgeneralresearchethicsbutalsowithclearlydelineatedresponsibilitiesofindividualresearchersandresearchinstitutes(MaxPlanckSociety2001).112AnexcerptfromtheMaxPlanckSociety’sprinciplesofethicallyresponsibleresearchstates:
“TheMaxPlanckSocietyundertakestocarryoutresearchwhichextendstheboundariesofknowledgeandenhancesthewelfareofmankindandtheprotectionoftheenvironment.Scientistsmustthereforepreventorminimizedirectorindirectharmtohumansandtheenvironmentasfaraspossible.Researchersmustnotsatisfythemselveswithadheringtolegalregulationswhenmakingapplicabledecisions,butmustalsotakeaccountofethicalprinciples(MaxPlanckSociety2010:6).”(Author’semphasis)
102
2.6.1InformedconsentTheprincipleofinformedconsentiswell-establishedinthemedicalfraternity.Itbecamea
researchstandardintheaftermathofatrocitiescommittedagainstconcentrationcamp
inmatesinthenameofmedicalsciencesattheNurembergtrials(Gilbert2008:150).Since
then,theprinciplehasbecomeacornerstoneofnaturalandsocialscienceresearchinvolving
humansubjects.AccordingtoBerg(citedinDavid/Sutton2011:43),informedconsententails
“theknowingconsentofindividualstoparticipateasandexerciseoftheirchoice,freefrom
anyelementoffraud,deceit,duress,orsimilarunfairinducementormanipulation.”Whilethe
principleprovidesa“legalremedy”primarilyinhealthresearch,informedconsentisbyno
meansthestopgapforethicalconcerns(Malone2003:813).O’Neillcommentsthatmany
researchdesignsaretoocomplexforlay-personstomakeaninformeddecisionaboutthe
impactoftheresearch(basedonapresentationbyO’Neill,whichiscitedin
Richardson/McMullan2007:1116).Despitethesevalidconcerns,theprincipleofinformed
consentwasupheldinthisresearchproject.
Withtheexceptionofthecovertparticipantobservationsmentionedearlier,allrespondents
consentedtoparticipatingintheresearch.Usuallyanintervieworfocusgroupwaspreceded
byeitheratelephonic,emailintroductionoranintroductoryvisit.Theresearcherpointedout
thatparticipationintheinterviewwasvoluntaryandthattheinformantcouldwithdrawat
anystage.Itiscustomarytoexchangebusinesscardsinsomesettings(e.g.Asia).Ialways
carriedinstitutionalbusinesscards,whichprovidedalocalcontactnumberandemailaddress.
Nophysicaladdress(otherthantheMPIfG’saddressinCologne)wasgivenasasecurity
precaution.Afterpersonalintroductions,theinstitutionalbackgroundandresearchwere
introduced.Priortocommencinganyinterview,Iexplainedtheobjectivesoftheresearch,
issuesofconfidentiality,anonymityanddataprotection.Respondentswereencouragedto
discusstheirconcernsandanyissuesarising.
Researchershavetoapplyforresearchpermitstoconductresearchwithinpublicinstitutions
inSouthAfrica.113Theresearchregistrationprocesscanstretchoverseveralmonths.Permits
113Althoughcommoninothercountries,thestrictresearchpermitsystemappearstobearelicofSouthAfrica’sapartheidpast.BackthenresearcherswererequiredtoobtainresearchpermitsfromeitherthecentralgovernmentorlocalauthoritiestoconductresearchinSouthAfricanhomelandsandtownships.Thepermit
103
stipulatewithwhomtheresearchermayinteract,howthedataistobeusedand
disseminated.Duetothe‘sensitivenature’ofrhinopoaching,therelevantresearchand
scientificcommitteesscrutinizeresearchproposalscarefullyandatlength,vettingprospective
researchersastheymaywellbe‘wolvesinsheepskin’.Thereareobviousandlessobvious
dangerstoconductingfieldworkinnationalparks,wherehighly-armedpoachersandanti-
poachingpersonnelroamthebush.Notonlyistheretheriskofaccidentaldeathofthe
researcherinthefield(apublicitydisasterislikelytoensue),therearejustifiedfearsthat
institutionalweaknessesandoperationalproceduresmaybesharedwiththirdpartiesor
exposedonpublicplatforms.Throughouttheresearchprocess,IhadtoconfirmthatIwasnot
affiliatedwithintelligencebodies,lawenforcementauthoritiesormediahouses.Oncemy
academiccredentialshadbeenconfirmedandfearsofintelligencegatheringhadbeen
dismissed,mypresencewaseitheracceptedorendured–dependingonthegeneralattitude
andapproachabilityoftheresearchparticipants,theirworkload,otherinstitutionalpressures
andidiosyncrasies.Therequesttosharedatasetswiththepermittingauthorities(SANParks
andEzemveloKZNWildlife)wasgentlydeclined,andgraciouslyaccepteduponexplanation
whyitwouldbeunethicaltodoso.Thestandardresearchcontractisaimedatnaturalscience
researchers,whoconductecologicalorbiologicalresearchintheparks.Unlikemostsocial
sciencesresearchthatdealswithpeople,societyandtheirmeanings,naturalsciences
datasetscanbesharedandcheckedforreproducibility.
TheresearchpermissionobtainedfromtheDepartmentofCorrectionalServices(DCS)
stipulatesthatresearchersneedtoobtainwrittenpermissionfromeachoffenderbefore
commencinginterviews.Theresearchguide114providedadepartmental“indemnityform”
(AppendixB),whichwastranslatedintoVietnameseandMandarintoenableoffendersto
readtheformintheirnativetongue.Oneoutofthirtyoffendersrefusedtosigntheformon
groundsofallegedlyhavingbeendupedbylawenforcementagenciesintosigningan
admissionofguiltform.Theinterviewcouldnotproceed.
stipulatedthatpermit-holdershavetosharetheirdraftswiththepermittingauthoritypriortopublication(Welsh1981:34–35).Severaldraftresearchcontractsforthisprojectstipulatedpriorapprovalofthedraftresearchreport(thePh.D.dissertation)priortosubmission.Thesecontractswereamendedtoreflectthatthedissertationwouldbesharedwiththepermittingauthorityonceithadbeensubmittedandaccepted.114TheDCSResearchCommitteeappointsdepartmentalresearchguidesthatactasresearchcoordinatorsbetweentheresearcherandtheDepartment.
104
Informedconsentshouldnotbeaonce-offengagementbutanon-goingprocess(Sieber:38).
Somerespondentswerevisitedmorethanonce;itwashenceimportanttore-checktheir
willingnesstoengagewiththeresearcher,whethertheywerecontentwiththeinterview
processorhadanysuggestionsforimprovement.Moreover,updatesonthefieldworkand
subsequentwritingprocesswereprovidedtosomekeyinformantsandotherswhohad
requestedupdatesontheprogressoftheproject.
2.6.2AnonymityandconfidentialitySincetheeconomicexchangeofrhinohornisillegal,theassuranceofanonymity,
confidentialityanddataprotectionwasveryimportantinestablishingtrustandrapportwith
respondents.Accordingtoveteranscholarsofinformalandillegalmarketsinsub-Saharan
AfricaEllisandMacGaffey(1996:24),thelikelihoodofgainingthetrustofinformants“will
dependinpartonthedegreeofillegalityofthecommoditiesbeingexchanged,onlocal
politics,onstatepoliciesandtheirimplementationorlackofitandontheextentof
involvementofstateofficialsandthedegreetowhichtheyenforcethelaw”.
Theprinciplesofanonymity,confidentialityanddataprotectionwereadheredtothroughout
andintheaftermathofdatacollection.Althoughsomeintervieweeswereindifferentabout
anonymity,forthesakeofconsistencyallquotesfrominterviewsandfocusgroupswere
anonymized.Wheredirectquotesareused,thegeneralattributesandcontextofthe
intervieweearegiven(asperthebreakdowninthesamplingsection).Respondentswhohad
privilegedknowledgeofillegalactivitiesconnectedtorhinopoaching,traffickingortrade
wererequestednottotalkaboutspecificpersons(oratleastnottomentiontheirreal
names),crimelocationsorplannedcriminalacts.Aguidingrulewasthatiftheresearcher
weretolearnaboutaseriousoffencebeingplanned,shewouldinformtheauthorities.Unlike
relationshipsbasedontheprincipleofprivilegedcommunicationfoundbetweendoctorsand
patientsorlawyersandclients,researchersandtheirrespondentsarenotprotectedbythe
sameprinciple(Sandberg/Copes2013:189).Theresearchertookaguardedandcautious
approachduringtheinterviewprocessinSouthAfricanprisonsbecause“indealingwith
105
inmates,aresearcherisinapositionwhereinadvertentlyperhaps,hemightbeinformedof
unresolvedcrimes,ofplanstodisturbprisonroutineortobreakjail,ofcorruptionamongst
guards,orofvicewithinthewalls”(NewmanquotedinSchlosser2008:8).Inmateswere
requestedtofocusontheirlifestoriesandinvolvementwithrhinosonlyandtoforego
mentioningspecificnamesandplaces.Whileassuringprisonersofnolinkagestothepoliceor
media,theywerediscouragedfromdisclosingpotentiallydamaginginformationduringthe
interview.
Duringfieldwork,theNationalAssemblyofSouthAfricapassedthecontroversialProtectionof
StateInformationAct(2010);atthetimeofwriting,theStatePresidenthadnotyetsignedoff
theAct.Concernedwiththeregulation,classification,anddisseminationofstateinformation,
theActisalreadyimpactingdatacollectionofresearchersandnewsgatheringofjournalists.
Onceenacted,obtainingclassifiedstateinformation“unlawfullyandintentionally”is
punishablewithextendedprisonsentences.115Whilelawsgoverningespionagearestandard
aroundtheworld,therearereasonablefearsthatSouthAfricanministersandintelligence
staffwillobtaindiscretionarypowersofclassificationthroughthenewlegislation.South
Africangovernmentrepresentativesareawareofthenewlaw,whichmadetheofficial
authorizationoftheresearchproject,intheformofresearchpermits,anabsolutenecessity.
Manygovernmentofficialstookacautiousapproachbyprovidingtheofficialpositiononrhino
issues.SouthAfricanparkofficials(includinganti-poachingpersonnel)havetosignasecrecy
clauseintheiremploymentcontract.Disclosureofincriminatingorprivilegedinformationto
thirdpartiescouldpotentiallyleadtotheterminationoftheemploymentcontract(Interview
115Section41oftheActdealswiththepossessionanddisclosureofclassifiedinformation:“AnypersonwhounlawfullyandintentionallydisclosesorisinpossessionofclassifiedstateinformationincontraventionofthisActisguiltyofanoffenceandisliabletoafineorimprisonmentforaperiodnotexceedingfiveyears,exceptwheresuchdisclosureorpossession—(a)isprotectedorauthorisedundertheProtectedDisclosuresAct,2000(ActNo.26of2000),theCompaniesAct,2008(ActNo.71of2008),thePreventionandCombatingofCorruptActivitiesAct,2004(ActNo.12of2004),theNationalEnvironmentalManagementAct,1998(ActNo.107of1998),ortheLabourRelationsAct,1995(ActNo.66of1995);(b)isauthorisedintermsofthisActoranyotherActofParliament;or(c)revealscriminalactivity,includinganycriminalactivityintermsofsection45ofthisAct.
106
withparkofficials,2013).Thisclauseseemstoensconceanatmosphereofsecrecyand
concealmentasregardstowhathappensat“GroundZero”inconservationareas.116
Researchassistantsandtranscribershadtosignconfidentialityagreements,andanencrypted
platformwasusedtotransmitrecordingsandtranscriptions.Moreover,oncetheir
assignmentswereconcluded,alldatarelatingtotheprojecthadtobedeleted.Alldevices
usedinthecourseoftheresearcharepasswordprotected;dataisencryptedandsecurely
stored.Atnostagewasinterviewdatasharedwiththirdpartiesalthoughsuchrequestswere
receivedonoccasionfromlawenforcementagentsandjournalists(thesectiononreciprocity
willdealwiththisinmoredetail).
2.6.3PositionalityoftheresearcherThereisaneedtocontextualizethebackgroundoftheresearcherandexplainwhythismay
beimportantinsituatingresearchmethods,datalimitations,andvalidity.Iamawhiteyoung
marriedSouthAfricanwomanwithNamibianandGermanroots,whoconductedtheresearch
withinstitutionalandfinancialbackingbyaGermanresearchinstitute.Thereisnodoubtthat
thesepersonalandinstitutionalattributesinfluencedtheresearchprocessandoutcome.
Anyexplanationofsociallifeis“filteredthroughthelensesoflanguage,gender,socialclass,
raceandethnicity”(Weiner-Levy2009:8).Inessence,aperson’sbackground,socialization,
socialcapitalandpersonalattributesimpactaccessinthefield,choiceofmethodsand
researchoutcomes.Withinthesocialsciences,along-standingriftexistsbetweenproponents
ofeither‘insider’or‘outsider’research.Inhisanalysisofthe‘insiderdoctrine’,RobertMerton
(1972:11)commented:
“Within[the]contextofsocialchange,wecomeuponthecontemporaryrelevanceofalong-standingprobleminthesociologyofknowledge:theproblemofpatterneddifferentialsamongsocialgroupsandstratainaccesstocertaintypesofknowledge.Initsstrongform,theclaimisputforwardasamatterofepistemologicalprinciplethatparticulargroupsineachmomentofhistoryhavemonopolisticaccesstoparticularkindsofknowledge.Intheweaker,moreempiricalform,theclaimholdsthatsome
116Insomeinstances,simplerequestsforuncontroversialdataorfollow-upinterviewshadtobeclearedbytheimmediatesuperiordespitetheresearchauthorization.
107
groupshaveprivilegedaccess,withothergroupsalsobeingabletoacquirethatknowledgeforthemselvesbutatgreaterriskandcost.”
The‘doctrineofinsiderism’emergedinthe1960sasacounterpointtothedominanceof
whitemeninWesternacademicinstitutions.Itholdsthatonlyinsiderscantrulyunderstand
andinterpretthesociallifeofthe‘underdog’,includingstudiesonAfricanAmericans(Merton
1972:13),womenintheGlobalSouth(Narayan1999)orindigenouspeople(Brayboy/Deyhle
2000;Zinn1979).Advocatesofthedoctrinearguethatmembersofthedominantor
privilegedstratacannotrelateorunderstandmechanismsofdomination.Infact,the
‘whiteness’ofresearchersmayreinforcesystemsofexploitation(Zinn1979),perpetuatethe
superiorityof‘theself’juxtaposednextto‘theother’(Cesara1982)ornormalizea
‘homogenized’approach(Abbott2006:326).EdwardSaid(1979:43)addsthefilterof
‘orientalism’–the‘westisbest’–avisionthatpromotes“thedifferencebetweenthefamiliar
(Europe,theWest,‘us’)andthestrange(theOrient,theEast,‘them’).”Followersofthe
positivistscienceparadigm,ontheotherhand,promote“inquiryfromtheoutside”.The
approachrecommendsthatscholarsdetachfromtheresearchsubjectandactneutrally
(Brannick/Coghlan2007:60).Itisarguedthat“overfamiliarity”and“insiderknowledge”
compromisestheresearchprocess(Lawhon/Herrick/Daya2014:18).Moreover,the
assumptionthatinsiders“automaticallyhaveamoresophisticatedandappropriateapproach
tounderstandingsocialrealityin‘their’society”isreferredto‘asfallingintothefallacyof
ThirdWorldism’(Sidaway1992:406).117Itmaybeusefultoavoidbifurcationofinsidersand
outsidersbecauseresourceful‘outsiders’haveshowntheabilitytomovealongthe‘outsider–
insidercontinuum’andachieveacceptance,even‘insider’statusamongsttheresearched–
“goingnative”–asevidencedinlegendaryethnographiesundertakenbyRabinow(1977)in
Morocco,118Malinowski(1979)intheWesternPacificregion,andGeertzandhiswifeonJava
(1976).Pragmatistsarelikelytorecommendthemiddleground;Merton’scall(1972:44)for
insidersandoutsiderstouniteisperhapsinstructiveinthisinstance.
117Thefallacyof‘ThirdWorldism’renegesontheassumptionthatresearchersfromtheGlobalSouthshouldonlyresearchThirdWorldtopics.118Rabinowachievednotorietyorcultstatus(dependingonwhoisjudging)forsharingdetailsofasexualencounterwithaBerberwomaninhisbookreflectingonhisexperiencesduringfieldworkinMorocco–nodoubt,aboldattempttoachieve‘insiderstatus’.
108
Itstandstoarguethatthisresearchprojectcomprisesboth‘insider’and‘outsider’
perspectives.Whilethehermeneutictraditionof“subjectiveinterpretation”(understanding
socialreality“byinterpretingthemeaningsheldbysocialactorsormembersofthesocial
group”)wasfollowed,Iwouldstepbackandconsiderthereliabilityandvalidityofdata
(Brannick/Coghlan2007:63–64),andhowmyownbiasesmightinfluencetheinterpretation
ofmeanings(Maykut/Morehouse1994:123).Despitemyparents’activeoppositiontothe
apartheidregimeinpre-independentNamibia,thereisnodenyingthatIwasborninto“white
privilege”orwhatLawhonandcolleagues(2014:18)label“themostaffluentandempowered
socialstratum”.119Itisnotunusualforresearchersfromaprivilegedbackgroundtotaketop-
down,‘selfversusothers’approachestosamplingandinterviewingwithoutcriticallyassessing
thepowerdifferentialsbetweentheresearcherandtheresearched(Schmid2010:170–172).
GiventhelegacyofapartheidandcolonialisminSouthernAfrica(andinAsia),Iwasconcerned
aboutacknowledgingpossiblebias,dismissingstereotypedperceptionsandItooknoteof
formsof‘othering’expressedduringtheinterviewingprocess.While‘othering’andsituational
powerdynamicscanhappenunknowinglyandsubliminallyininterpersonalinteractions,so
canfeelingsofempathy,understanding,comprehensionofattendantlifeexperiencesand
ideologiescontributetothebridgingofcleavages(Weiner-Levy2009:3).Myapproachwasto
exudeempathyandunderstandingwithoutbeingdismissiveorjudgmentalduringthe
researchproject.Severalscholarshaveshownthat‘emotionwork’canoverrulethe
researcher’spositionalityandleveltheplayingfield(Weiner-Levy2009;Dickson-Swiftetal.
2009).
Inpractice,thewindsofchangeblowslowlythroughmanypartsofsouthernAfrica,where
cleavagesbasedonasymmetricalpowerrelationshipsofyesteryearpersist.Mostofthe
actorsinvolvedintheillegalrhinohorntradechainaremen,whichmayleadtoaone-
dimensionalfocusonmen’slivedexperiences(Chambers1983:77).Themarketisembedded
insociety,andthus,Ipurposefullyincludedwomentoassesshowpoaching,trafficking,and
consumptionofrhinohornimpactedtheirdailylivesandsocietalstructures.Concerted
119Inits2013assessmentofinequalityacrosscountries,theUnitedNationsDevelopmentProgrammefoundSouthAfricatobethemostunequalsocietyintheworld(UnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramme2013).TheassessmentwasbasedonthecontroversialGinicoefficientmethod,whichhasbeencriticizedonmanyaccounts,includingthatitdisregardsthesocialgrantssysteminSouthAfrica(Donnelly2013).Controversiesaside,deepandgrowingeconomicandsocialcleavagespersistmorethan20yearsaftertheendofapartheid.
109
effortsweremadetoleveltheplayingfieldbetweentheresearcherandtheresearched.As
mentionedearlier,theprinciplesofinformedconsent,anonymity,confidentialityanddata
protectionwereethicalcornerstones.Moreover,respondentswereencouragedtotake
controloftheresearchprocessbyhavingtheoptiontowithdrawfromtheinterviewatany
stage,inviteotherstoparticipateintheinterview,directtheflowofinformationby
withholdingoronlypartiallyansweringsensitivequestions(Scheyvens2014:9).Duetothe
unstructured,interactiveandnarrative-conversationalstyleoftheinterviews,research
participantshadconsiderableandimplicitcontrolovertheinterviewprocess(Corbin/Morse
2003:338).Researchinformantsonlytoldtheirstoryiftheyfeltateasewiththeresearcher.
Unlessthereweresecurityconcerns,respondentschosethelocationoftheinterviewand
determinedhowmuchtimetheyweregoingtodedicate.Whenasuitableinterpreterwas
available,theyweregiventheoptionofgettinginterviewedintheirpreferredlanguage.
Itookaccountoftheprioritiesofrespondentsontheground(Raghuram/Madge2006:276)
andreassessedtherelevanceoftheresearchquestion,methodsandapproachthroughout
thedatacollectionprocess.Academicproceduresandprocessesusuallyallowlittleflexibility
onceresearchprojectshavebeenapproved.Inthisinstance,theMPIfG,myadvisors,andthe
researchcoordinatorsupportedunscheduledchangesoradditions,suchasadaptingthe
researchfocus,extendingstaysandaddingadditionalresearchsites.Greatcarewastakento
respectandcomplywithlocalcustomsandtraditionsinsouthernAfricaandSoutheastAsia.
Localresearchassistantswereemployedtobridgecultural,socialandlanguagedivides.
Permissiontovisitandconductinterviewswassoughtfromcommunityleaders,traditional
chiefsorcommunitygatekeeperswhenenteringvillagecommunities.120
120VillagecommunitieslivingontheedgeoftheKrugerNationalParkhavebeenlabelledas“smugglertowns”,“poachingvillages”or“criminalisedcommunities”inpublicnarratives.Manyprivateandpublicspooks,aswellasjournalistsandfilmmakers,havevisitedtheregion,oftendisrespectingthemostbasicrulesofsocialengagementsuchasrespectforthedignityofcommunitymembers,privacyandpoliteness.Ilearntofoutrightdisrespectandtrespassingatthehandofsuchactorsduringfocusgroupswithcommunitymembersin2013.Spooksandjournalistswouldtakerandompicturesofvillagersandtheirdwellingswithouttheirconsent,labellingthemas‘poachers’and‘housesbuiltfromtheproceedsofpoaching’insubsequentpublications.Forexample,aprivateintelligencereport(inmypossession)reproducedthepictureofawell-knownconservatorgoingaboutdailychoresinMassingir,fingeringhimasapersonofinterest.Whilemanycommunitymembersmightbelivingbelowthebreadline,theydohavereadyaccesstothemediafurtheraggravatingasenseof‘othering’,andtheimplicitcriminalizationofthewholecommunityinsteadofafew.InhotpursuitofaninterviewwithapoachingkingpininMozambique,aSwedish-Germanjournalistteamborethebruntofthegrowingangerandfatigueofaffectedcommunities(Grill2015).Theywenttoseekoutapoachingkingpinathisprivateresidencewithoutaninvitationorintroduction.Oninstructionbythekingpin,abiggroupofvillagersaccusedtheduooftrespassing.
110
Attemptsweremadetoseekoutassistantstowhomtheresearchwouldbebeneficialnot
onlyinfinancialtermsbutalsoinfurtheringpersonalambitionssuchascareeradvancement
inthefieldofresearch,translation,transcriptionoractingasa‘fixer’.Astheresearchwas
undertakentowardsaPh.D.,co–authorshiporanyassistancebeyondresearchfacilitation
wouldconstituteabreachofintellectualownershipandisnotallowedbythedoctoraldegree
regulationsoftheUniversityofCologne.121Toshowcourtesyandrespect,Ipickedupbasic
languageskillstobeabletogreetandthankresearchinformantsintheirmothertongue.122
ThesamplealsoincludedtheinterviewingofpoliticalandeconomicelitesinsouthernAfrica
andSoutheastAsia.Theaimwastoassesstheirroleandagencyinthedevelopmentand
implementationofwildlifeconservationpolicies.In-depthknowledgeoftherhinofield,
familiaritywiththerespondent’sbackground,organizationalcultureandculturalnormsof
behaviourfacilitatedgainingtheirtrustandestablishingrapport(Mikecz2012:482).
Decorum,etiquette,punctualityandformaldresssenseassistedinimprovingtheresearcher’s
positionality.Eliteinterviewersrecommendthattheresearchershouldshowflexibilityto
accommodatethebusyschedulesofelites(Odendahl/Shaw2001:312).Theresearcherdid
notdifferentiatebetweeneliteandotherinterviewees.Itwasassumedthateachrespondent
hadmoreimportantthingstotakecareofthantalktoaresearcher.Asaconsequence,I
displayedutmostflexibilityasregardsthetime,lengthandvenueoftheinterview.Ihad
undertakeninterviewswithelitesinthepastdecade.Withincreasingmaturityandagrowing
professionalreputation,elitesappearedto‘takememoreseriously’.Odendahlsharesthis
Theywerearrestedallegedlyoninstructionbytworhinopoachingkingpinsandheldinpoliceholdingcellsforafewdays.Thejournalistsacknowledgedthattheyshouldhaveintroducedthemselvestothecommunityelderinamagazinearticleaftertheirrelease,whichwasbrokeredthroughhigh-leveldiplomaticintervention.BartholomäusGrill’ssideofthestorycanbeaccessedat:http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/investigation-into-rhino-poaching-turns-into-kidnapping-a-1022611.html121IparticipatedinthejointPh.D.programmeoftheInternationalMaxPlanckResearchSchoolontheSocialandPoliticalConstitutionoftheEconomyandtheFacultyofManagement,EconomicsandSocialSciencesoftheUniversityofCologne.The“Promotionsordnung”canbefoundat:http://www.wiso.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/wiso_fak/fakultaet/dokumente/forschung/Promotion/Promotionsordnung_EN.pdf122Respondentsspokethefollowinglanguages:Shangaan,Tsonga,Zulu,Xhosa,Venda,Afrikaans,English,Portuguese,Vietnamese,CantoneseandMandarin.IamfluentinAfrikaansandEnglishandhavesomeverybasicXhosaandPortugueselanguageskills.
111
observation(ibid)andwarnsthatelitesareusedtobeinginchargeandresearchersshould
readnon-verbalcues(2001:312).Althoughconsciousofstatusandpowerdifferentials,Idid
notmakespecialprovisions(beingmoresubmissiveorassertive)whendealingwithelites.An
egalitarianapproachwaspursuedwherebyallrespondentsweretreatedlike“elites”.
Whileempathyandsharedideologiescanbridgepre-existingcleavagesofethnicity,religion,
andgender,sociologistsandcriminologistsareoftenaccusedofbiasinfavourofthe
“underdog”(Becker1967;Liebling2001).Becker(1967:241–242)describesthechargeofbias
asfollows:
“Associologists,weprovokethechargeofbias,inourselvesandothers,byrefusingtogivecredenceanddeferencetoanestablishedstatusorder,inwhichknowledgeoftruthandtherighttobeheardarenotequallydistributed.“Everyoneknows”thatresponsibleprofessionalsknowmoreaboutthingsthanlaymen,thatpolicearemorerespectableandtheirwordsoughttobetakenmoreseriouslythanthoseofdeviantsandcriminalswithwhomtheydeal.Byrefusingtoacceptthehierarchyofcredibility,weexpressdisrespectfortheentireestablishedorder.”
Howdoresearchersdealwithtakingsides?Beckerarguesthatitisimpossiblenottotake
sides.However,researchersshouldensurethatresearch“meetsthestandardsofgood
scientificwork”byusing“precautionarymeasures”designedtoguardagainstthe
manipulationofresearchtools,theories,andtechniques(Becker1967:246).Thedangerof
presentingone’sresearchas“objective,scientificandprecise”(Bosworthetal.2005:258)lies
inthesuperficialtreatmentofpowerdifferentialsbetweentheresearcherandthe
researched.
Nowherearethepowerdifferentialsbetweentheresearcherandtheresearchedmore
evidentthaninaprisonenvironment.Themostcrucialdifferencerelatestotheresearcher’s
abilitytoextractherselfatlibertyandleavethephysicalconfinesoftheprisonatherbehest.
Inmates“sleep,playandwork”inoneandthesameplace,inwhatGoffman([1957]1970:
314)classifiedasa“totalinstitution”.Typicaloftotalinstitutionsaretighttimescheduleswith
noleewayformanoeuvring.Routineactivitiesareimposed“throughasystemofformal
rulingsandabodyofofficials”(ibid).Avisitbyacompletestrangeristhusanextraordinary
event,whichsetsintomotionseveralbureaucraticandsocialprocesses.Inpreparationformy
112
visit,socialworkersattachedtotheindividualcorrectionalcentresintroducedmyprojectand
researchobjectivesinpreliminarymeetings.Ihadseveralcontactpersonsateachprisonwith
whomIinteractedinthemonthsprecedingtheinterviews.Someoftheinmatesexpressed
initialconcerns,fearingthatIwasattachedtothepoliceandthattheirsentencemight
increase,shouldtheysay“somethingwrong”.Conversely,someinmateshopedthatby
openinguptome,Iwouldputinagoodwordtohavetheirsentencereduced.The
significanceofdailyroutinesandscheduleswasalsoapparentwhenitcametoschedulingthe
interviews,whichhadtohappeneitherstraightafterbreakfastandbeforelunchorafter
lunchandbeforelock-down.123Adheringtoinstitutionalregulations,acknowledgingand
accommodatingdailyroutines(suchaslunchorphysicalexercise)wereimportantaspectsof
showingrespecttoinmates.124Interviewstookplaceinprisonoffices(suchastheofficeofthe
socialworker,administratorsorheadofprisonandboardrooms).Insomeinstances,Iwas
allowedtoconductinterviewswithprisonersonaone-by-onebasiswithnooneelsepresent.
Whileperhapslessthanidealconcerningsecurityconsiderations,theseinterviewswerethe
mostopenandfruitful.Inotherinstances,prisonwardens,DCSsupervisorystaff,and
interpreterswerepresent,whichfailedtoinspireconfidentialityandanonymity,and
consequentially(andunderstandably)ledtolessrewardingexchanges.
InthewordsofLiebling(2014:482):”Thisisnoordinaryresearchenvironment”.Eachprison
camewithitsown“barrierstoaccess”(ibid),whichtheresearcherhadtonegotiatewithstaff
andprisoners.Asmentionedinearliersections,theDepartmentofCorrectionalServices
sanctionedtheresearchbywayofaresearchpermit.Numerousregulationsandrestrictions
wereimplementedprior,duringandaftertheresearchprocess.Securityandbackground
checkswereundertaken(criminalrecorddisqualifiesentryontoprisongrounds).Goffman
portraysthe“mortificationofself”whenindividualsfirstentertotalinstitutions.Personal
123Lock-downreferstothetimewheninmateshavetoreturntotheircellsforthenight.Insomecorrectionalcentres,thelockdownprocesshappensasearlyas3or4PM.Thelockdownprocedureinvolvesaheadcount,earlydinnerandreturntotheprisoncellsforthenight.124Ihadtore-scheduleoneinterviewatshortnoticeduetotrafficcongestion,whichledtotheinmate’sgymroutinegettinguprooted.Uponmylatearrival,Isensedangerandunhappiness.Aftersomeprobing,Igottothecoreofmyinterviewpartner’sannoyance.Uponacknowledgingtheinmate’sangerasjustified,apologizingandexplainingwhyIarrivedlate,Icouldgoaheadwiththeinterview–whichturnedouttobehighlyinsightfulandinteresting.
113
belongingsareremovedthrough“strippingprocesses”andinmateshavetosubmittothe
prison“staffclass”,leadingtotheminimizationof“ego-investedseparatenessfromfellow
inmates”(Goffman[1957]1970:317–318).Prisongangsimposeanotherlayerofmortification
throughtheirsocialorder,systemofprivilegesandruleswithintheSouthAfricanprison
system.125UponenteringtheLosAngelescountyjailforthefirsttime(similartomy
experience),sociologistWacquant(2002:373)observes:
“Whatgrabsyouimmediatelyandbeforeallelseuponpenetratingintothishumongoushumanstorehouseisthedeafeninganddisorientingnoise:doorsbanging,boltsopeningandclosing,keysjangling,feetshuffling,shrillshouts,bluntorders,andtatteredshredsofconversationsthatrussle,rippleandresoundinahigh-densitysonicmishmashunlikeanyother.”
Althoughmyentryintoprisonswastemporary,Iexperiencedasenseof“mortification”and
alienationfromtherestofsocietywhileonthe“inside”.Ihadbeenaskedtowearplain
clothing,practicalshoesandnojewellery.Nobagsormobilephonesweretobetakeninto
prisons.Ihadtoobeyinstructionsfromprisonstaff.Whatmadetheseriesofinterviewsless
dauntingwasmyfrequentcontactwithinmatesandformerinmatessinceteenageyearsdue
tomymother’sprofessionalcareerintheprisonsector.
2.6.4ReciprocityTheissueofreciprocityprovidesadifficultconundruminqualitativeresearch.Differentstages
ofresearchrelyon“negotiatingcomplexsocialsituations”(Harrison/MacGibbon/Morton
2001:323),whichrelyondegreesofreciprocitybetweentheinterviewerandinterviewee.
Thissectiondealslesswiththesocialaspectsofprovingtheresearcher’strustworthinessto
respondents;thefocusisdirectedattheresearcher’sabilitytoreciprocateforthetimeand
effortofrespondents.Itcouldbearguedthatresearchperseservesthecommongood,which
initselfsignalsreciprocity.Inhisanalysisoftheconvertibilityofdifferentformsofcapital,
125Similartopenitentiaryinstitutionsaroundtheworld,competingprisongangsareactiveinSouthAfricanprisons.Oftenreferredtoasthenumbergangs,the26s,27sand28sfulfilspecificfunctionsandrunillicitprisoneconomies.Steinberg’s‘Thenumber’offersafascinatingethnographicaccountofthenumbergangsoperatinginCapeTown’sPollsmoorprison(2005b).
114
Bourdieu(1986:48)ponderstheroleofacademicqualificationsinreproducingsocial
structure“bysanctioningthehereditarytransmissionofculturalcapital”.Unlikeotherforms
ofcapital,thetransmissionofculturalcapital(anacademicqualificationisitsinstitutionalized
form)is“neithertransmissiblenornegotiable”(Bourdieu1986:55).126
Whilethedoctoraldegreeisobviouslytotheresearcher’sbenefit,thesubstantialproductof
theresearchisthewrittendissertation.Manyoftherespondentsgavemeseveralhoursof
theirtime(oftenafterhours),whichcouldhavebeenspentatworkorwiththeirfamiliesor
friends.Somealtruisticrespondentshadnoexpectationsofdirectreciprocity:“Everyoneis
tryingtosavetheirrhinotheirway”(Interviewwithconservator,2013).Somerespondents
haverequestedfeedbackorcopiesofthedissertationonceithasbeenfinalized.Iwillwrite
upanexecutivesummaryoftheresearchfindingstobedistributedamongstinterested
respondents,whichismoreaccessibletolaypersonsthanalengthyacademicdissertation.
AnthropologySouthernAfrica,aregionalassociationofanthropologists,hascodifiedthe
practiceofreciprocityinitsprofessionalcodeofethics.127Wherepossible,anthropologistsare
responsible“forfeedingthebenefitsthatflowfromtheresearchbackintotheresearch
communitiesthatparticipatedintheresearch”(AnthropologySouthernAfrica2014:3).Inits
‘CodeofEthics’,theInternationalSociologicalAssociationdealswithissuesofsecurity,
anonymity,andprivacyofresearchsubjects.Perhapsduetotheascendencyofquantitative
methodologiesinsociologyoverthepastdecades,theissueofreciprocityisonlyconsidered
ingeneralterms:
126Bourdieu(1986:55)arguesthatculturalcapitalistransferredcontinuouslywithinthefamilyunit.Itis,however,difficulttomeasureandcontrol.127AsmostofthefieldworkwascarriedoutinsouthernAfrica,itonlyseemstoappropriatetoconsultlocalethicsstandardsandcross–comparingthemwithinternationalstandards.Anthropologistsseemtohavegivenampleconsiderationtoethicalissuesthatmightoccurinfieldwork.TheAmericanAnthropologicalAssociationhasdevelopedseveralpositionpapersandanethicsblog(http://www.aaanet.org/cmtes/ethics/Ethics-Resources.cfm),andtheWorldCouncilofAnthropologicalAssociationshasestablishedanethicstaskforcetoreviewglobalethicsguidelines(http://www.wcaanet.org/about/task_force.shtml#et).Whilesociologicalassociationsalsohaveacodeofethics(e.g.theAmericanSociologicalAssociation:http://www.asanet.org/images/asa/docs/pdf/CodeofEthics.pdfortheabovementionedInternationalSociologicalAssociation),thecodesareaimedatbothqualitativeandquantitativeresearchers.Thus,issuesthatareparticularlypertinenttoqualitativeresearchersaredealtwithingeneralterms,ifatall.
115
“Paymentofinformants,thoughacceptableinprinciple,shouldbediscouragedasfaraspossibleandsubjecttoexplicitconditions,withspecialregardtothereliabilityoftheinformationprovided(InternationalSociologicalAssociation2001).”
WhileInevercompensatedrespondentsforinformationorinterviews,Ipaidforcoffee,lunch
orrefreshmentsonoccasion.Inreturnforthetimeandeffortofthoseinterviewed,requests
forresearchmaterials,adviceongeneralorganizedcrime-relatedissuesandcallsforprogress
reportswereheeded.Anyrequeststoshareresearchdataorfindingsprematurelywere
declined.
Oncepublished,thereisariskthatothersmayuseresearchfindingstofurthertheirpolitical
agendas.Whileitisbeyondtheresearcher’scontrolhowtheworkwillbeusedorinterpreted,
greatcarewastakento“guardagainstabuses”(David/Sutton2011:21).Theguiding
principlesweretheprotectionofresearchrespondentsfrompersonalidentificationand
responsibilityasregardsanyclaimsmadeinthisdissertation(ibid).TheInternational
AssociationofSociologistsfurthermoresuggeststhatincaseof“distortions,simplifications
andmanipulations”ofresearchmaterial,theresearchershould“intervenetocorrectanykind
ofmisinterpretationormisuseoftheirwork”(InternationalSociologicalAssociation2001).I
reservetherighttodoso,shouldtheneedarise.
Theissueofreciprocityconstitutesaseriousethicalchallengeinprisoninterviews.TheDCS
indemnityformstipulates(seeAppendixB):“Idonotwantorexpectanyrewardofany
natureforpartakingintheinterview”.Thereishencelittleincentivetoparticipateinresearch,
otherthantherebeingnopunitiveconsequencesforparticipation,andtalkingtosomeone
“fromtheoutside”maybebeneficialtotheinmate(Schlosser2008:9).USresearchonthe
perceptionsofbenefitsandharmsofprisoninterviewsshowedthatinmatesexperienced
“psychologicalsatisfactions,arespitefromtheboredomofprisonlife,andmonetarygain”
andnoonefeltcoercedintopartakingorharmedduringtheinterview
(Copes/Hochstetler/Brown2013:182).Iofferednomoneyinexchangefortheinterviews.
SeveralinmatesrequestedthatIshouldreturnduringvisitinghoursreservedforfamily
members,perhapssignallingloneliness,stigmatizationandirregularvisitsbyfamilymembers.
Othersrequestedpracticalitemssuchassoaporfood.Iwasveryclearaboutmypersonal
spaceandethicalrestrictions.Duetotimeconstraints,prisonsandinmatescouldonlybe
116
visitedonceforthisresearchproject.Arelationshipbasedonhonestyandtrustworthinessis
difficulttoestablishduringaonce-offvisit.Theresearcherundertooktoshareherdissertation
withsocialworkersresponsiblefortheinmatesthatwereinterviewed.128
2.6.5SecurityconcernsThesecurityofrespondentsandresearchassistantswasofmajorimportance.Beforeentering
thefield,researchersshoulderronthesideofcautionandensurethat“informantsarenot
jeopardizedinanyway”(Ellis/MacGaffey1996:29).Lengthyscopingassessmentswere
undertakentoassessriskstorespondents,researchassistants,andtheresearcher.Afurther
dimensionrelatestothetrustworthinessofresearchassistants,astheymayconstitutea
securityriskormaybelinkedtointelligenceservices.Theresearcherreliedonreferralsfrom
trustedsources.
Researchthatinvestigatesinter-personalviolencecarriestheriskofsecondaryvictimization
ortraumatizationofrespondents.Interestingly,bothpoachersandgamerangersshared
personaltalesoffear,lossanddanger.Whilesomenarrativesweredisturbing(tothe
researcher,researchassistants,andtranscribers),respondentsexpressedgratitude
(sometimesevenrelief)tobeabletosharetheir“versionofthetruth”.Socialworkers
providedpre–andaftercareforincarceratedrespondents,theresearcherdebriefedresearch
assistantsandtranscribers.Iwasconsciousoftheriskofbecomingdesensitizedasa
consequenceofwhatIhadwitnessedinthefield(Dickson-Swiftetal.2007)and“warstories”
sharedbyconvictedrhinocriminalsandanti-poachingpersonnel.Talkswithadvisors,fellow
researchers,andfamilymembers129assistedmyownprocessofdebriefing.Bahnand
Weatherill(2013:22)warnthatdesensitizationcouldleadtoresearchersbecomingless
vigilantabouttheirpersonalsecurity.Thepositionalityoftheresearcherregardinghaving
livedthebetterpartofherlifeinsouthernAfricaandtheunfortunateexperienceof
aggravatedassaultinthepastprecludedrecklessbehaviour.128Theprospectof“teachinganoldcatnewtricks”bydisseminatingtheresearchtoconvictedrhinopoachersandtraffickersisunlikely.Inthisinstance,disseminationoftheresearchwillbehandledatthediscretionoftheresponsiblesocialworkers.129MymotherrunsanNGOthatdealswiththereintegrationofex-prisonersintosociety.
117
Despiteundertakingresearchinfar-flungruralareaswithlittleornophonesignal,Imade
surethatmyhusbandoranassignedpersonknewwhereIwasandhowtogetholdofme.
However,accurateinformationondetaileditinerariesandrespondentswassharedona
‘need-to-know’basis(Felbab-Brown2014:2).Asarule,meetingswerescheduledinpublic
spacesunlessitwouldhavebeenrudetorejectaninvitationtoattenddinnerorasocial
occasionintheprivatespaceofknownrespondents.Sensitiveinformationincludingthe
namesandtelephonenumbersofgatekeepersandrespondentsweredestroyeduponleaving
theresearchsite(Felbab-Brown2014:3).Myhusbandaccompaniedmeonthesecondfield
triptoMozambique,whichaddedalayerofsecurityandwasusefulduringinterviewswith
communitymembers,poachersandkingpins.Mypositionalityasthe“wife”renderedthe
interviewlessthreateningandeventhoughIwasdoingtheinterviewing,respondentswould
oftenaddresstheirresponsestohim.
GainingaccesstorhinopoachersandestablishingtrustwassurprisinglyeasyinMassingirand
surroundingvillagesinMozambique.Afewdayswerespentwalkingaroundthevillage,
chattinginformallytopeopleonthestreets,inbarsandmarkets.130Forsecurityreasons,Iwas
initiallyguardedaboutmyresearchsubject.UponexplainingthatIwaswritingabookthat
dealswiththejourneyofrhinohornfromAfricatoAsiatoaprimarygatekeeper(‘MrBig’131
inavillage),greatopportunitiesaroseandourinitialmeetingservedasan‘icebreaker’.
Respondentswerekeentoprovidetheirsideofthestory.Perhapsmostsignificantly,some
respondentsregardedtheiractivitiesorthoseoftheirfellowvillagersaslegitimateand
providedlegallabels:“poacher”became“hunter”,“kingpin”became“businessman”and
“poachingintheKrugerNationalPark”became“visitingSkukuza”132(thiswillbediscussedin
moredetailintheempiricalchapters).OncewehadbeeninMassingirformorethanone
week,itbecameclearthatweshouldnot‘overstayourwelcome’.Naturally,Ihadinterviewed
thosekingpinsandpoachersthatwerewillingtotalktome.Animosityandcompetition
betweendifferentpoachinggangsandkingpinsmadeforadifficultterrainriddledwith‘turf
130TheservicesofanativeShangaan-speakerwereemployedtoassistwithtranslations.131Organizersofrhinohunts(kingpins)areoftenreferredtoas‘MrBig’(therearenoMrsBig’satthislevel).132SkukuzaisthemaincampandadministrativecentreoftheKrugerNationalPark.
118
issues’.Towardstheendofourstay,rivalpoachersstartedfollowingus,ourphotowastaken,
andwefoundascrewdriverwedgedintothethicktireofourvehicle.Weweresentclear
signalsthatitwastimetoleave.133OurnextstopwasinChokwe,formerlyknownasthe‘Wild
West’ofMozambique‘whereanythinggoes’.134InformantswarnedustocoverupourSouth
Africanvehiclenumberplateatnightdespitethefactthatthecarwasparkedbehindalocked
gatewithasecurityguardinattendance.
Theexpectationof‘teamoney’135providedafurthersecurityandtimeconcern.Certain
popularMozambicanroutesarenotoriousforformalandunofficialroadblocks.Publicofficials
areunderpaidandsomeusetheirofficialstatus(anduniform)toaugmenttheirincome.
Foreign-registeredcarsareeasyprey.Wearrivedatoneofficialbordercrossingonehour
beforeitwasduetoclose.Althoughwewereinpossessionofalltherequiredpaperwork,
traffictriangles,specialstickersandbibs,136theofficialswerestallingtheprocesswithseveral
securityteams‘searching’ourcar.Despitethelegitimatefearthatwewouldnotmakeit
acrosstheborderthatdayandtheprospectofhavingtodrivebacktotheclosestsettlement
about2hoursfromtheborder,wedidnottakethebait.Eventually,oneoftheofficialsasked
foravisibleT-shirtinthecar,whichwehappilypartedwithandthenwereallowedonward
passagemomentsbeforetheborderpostwasduetoclosefortheday.Obviously,corruption
isatwo-sidedaffairofsomeonesolicitingabribeandthecounterpartbeingwillingtopaya
bribetoforegoworsescenariossuchasbeingholedupinthemiddleofnowherewith
133IreturnedtoMassingirafewweeksafterthescrewdriverincident,pursuanttoreceivingconfirmationfromanotherkingpinandhisassociate(anactivepoacherandtransporter)thattheywerewillingtotalktome.Ihadbeenincontactwiththekingpinforseveralweeksaftergettingapersonalintroductionandreferraltohim.MyhusbandhadreturnedtoCapeTowninthemeantime,soItookalongafriendasasecurityprecautiononmythirdtriptoMassingir.Thekingpindidhissecurityverification.Ifeltsafeandwelcomethroughouttheencounter.Basicrulesofengagementhadbeenfollowedonbothsides.Asaresult,theinterviewwaslong,intensiveandinsightful.134AccordingtoSouthAfricanpolicesources,manyvehiclesstoleninSouthAfricaaretraffickedthroughortradedinChokwe.Interestingly,wenoticedthatmanypoachersandkingpinsweredrivingluxuryfour-wheeldrivevehicleswithSouthAfricannumberplateswithnovalidregistrationdisks.LawenforcementsourcesconfirmedtheexistenceofbartertradeofrhinohornforluxuryitemsincludingcarsandseasidepropertiesinMozambique.135Lawenforcementofficialsseldomaskstraightoutforabribe;corruptibilityishiddenbehindmodestdemandsforadonationtowardstea/juice/lunchorvisibleluxuryitemsinone’spossession.136Theomissionofanyofthesecanleadtohefty‘fines’.WemetoneSouthAfricanholiday–maker,whowasfinedR2500(approximately220Euros)foronlycarryingonereflectivebib.
119
nowheretogo.Inthisinstance,partingwithaT-shirtseemedthesmallerpricetopay.We
weresparedfromanyfurtherincidentsdespitedrivingthrough11roadblocksduringthe
Mozambicanfieldtrip.
BeforetravelingtoVietnam,Iwaswarnedthattherhinoissuewas“sensitive”andthatitwas
bestnottomentionmycountryoforigin(SouthAfrica)orresearchtopic.Thefall-back
positionwasinterestinthepracticeofTraditionalChineseMedicine.Ajudgmentcallwas
madeonacase-by-casebasis;I,however,foundthatplayingopencardsaboutthereal
objectiveoftheresearchledtobetteraccessanddata.Moreover,theinterviewquestions
werenevertargetedatobtainingintelligence,namesofcriminalsorinformationthatcould
putrespondents,researchassistantsortheresearcher(myself)atrisk.
Theneedforcheckingsecurityarrangementsatfieldsiteswasnotaone-sidedaffair.Oncean
interviewhadbeensecuredandconfirmedwithtwohigh-levelactorsintheillegalrhinohorn
supplychain,Iwasdirectedtoarestaurantinapublicsquareandwaitedfornearlyfourhours
fortheresearchinformantstoarrive.Theyhadsentseveraladvancepartiestocheckoutthe
researchteam.OncetheyweresatisfiedthatIwasabonafideresearcher,thepairarrived,
andtheinterviewcouldstart.Severalotherrespondentsalsodidtheir‘duediligence’,
phoningupmyreferenceorconfirmingwithlawenforcementthatIwas‘trustworthy’.
Eveninsocietieswheregenderequalityismoreorlessrespected,femaleresearchershaveto
overcomeadditionalhurdleswhenitcomestostudying“hardboiledmen’stopics”suchas
organizedcrimeorillegalmarkets(Felbab-Brown2014:11).Ihadpreviousexperiencein
conductinginterviewswithsecurityforces,lawenforcementagents,andothers.Keyto
conductingsuccessfulinterviewsisto“stay[…]calmbutconfident”andtoestablish“one’s
professionalcredibilityanddepthofknowledge”(ibid)throughouttheinteraction.Ibriefed
localsecurityforcesandlawenforcementagenciesonmyresearch,notonlytoreceivetheir
buyinandparticipationininterviewsbutalsoasaprecautionarymeasuresothatotherlocal
informantscouldnotbeblamedforcollaborationininterviews(Wilson1992:195).While
undertakingmyfieldwork,Icontinuallyassessedwhethermyresearchposedarisktothose
interviewed(Brooks2014:37).
120
Sexualharassmentorsexualadvances,frequentlyencounteredbyfemaleresearchersinthe
field,seldomgetsproblematizedinresearchreportsormethodssections.Thepowerof
wearingaweddingringneedstobeacknowledgedalthoughthismayserveasevenmore
encouragementinsomecircles.Unfortunatelyonceembeddedinthefield,Ihadtoforget
aboutfeminist,religiousorpoliticalbeliefsforthelengthoftheintervieworfieldvisit.Several
sexualadvanceswerelaughedoff.It,however,provedmoredifficulttonavigatethrough
interactionswithrespondentswhoexpressedracistattitudesorincitementtokillalleged
poachers.Innormalcircumstances,thiswouldhaveledtomy,atleast,leavingthe
conversation,ifnotreportingtheoffendingpersontoEqualityCourts137fortheuseof
derogatoryterms,theuseofwhichisbannedunderSouthAfricanlaw.
2.7Concludingremarks
Theaimofthischapterwastoexpandontheresearchdesign,methodologicalchoicesandthe
salientethicalissuesencounteredduringthe14monthsoffieldwork.Thebreadthandlength
offieldworkmeritsengagementwithmethodologicalchoicesandethicalconcerns,andmay
beusefultootherresearcherswantingtoundertakemulti-sitedethnographieswith
respondentsfromdifferentsocialstrata,nationalities,culturalbackgroundsandgender.
Verificationandtriangulationofdatawereessentialelementsofdatacollectionandanalysis,
necessitatingthehugesampleandthedifferentmethodsofdatacollectionemployed.While
ethicalconsiderationscontributelittletotheresearchfindingsandtheoreticalcontributionof
thestudyperse,theyarenonethelessdeemedsignificantinexplainingmethodological
choices,potentialshortcomings,meritsandinterpretationofthedata.Thelegacyofsocial
sciencesexperimentsandresearch‘gonewrong’reverberatestheneedforcriticalreflection
onone’sownreasonsandobjectivesfordoingsensitiveresearch.Despitetheearlier
mentioned‘unethical’researchbeinglabelledas‘misguided’or‘reprehensible’,thescientists
137CreatedthroughthePromotionofEqualityandPreventionofUnfairDiscriminationActof2000,SouthAfricanequalitycourtsarespecializedcourtsthatdealwithmattersofunfairdiscrimination,hatespeechandharassment(seemoreathttp://www.justice.gov.za/EQCact/eqc_faq.html#sthash.Jg72gwSO.dpuf).
121
were“prominentintellectualswhooccupiedinfluentialpositionsandgenerallyconformedto
theacceptedstandardsofacademicrigouroftheday”(Dubow1995:3).
122
Chapter3:Ofunicornsandrhinohorns:Thedemandforrhinohorn
3.1Introduction
Currentlyrhinohorntradesasoneoftheworld’smostexpensivegoods(comparewithGraph
1inChapter1).Accordingtostandardeconomicprinciples,withoutdemandthereisno
supplyandhencenomarket.Thequestionofdemandandtheassociatedcoordination
problemofvaluationarevitaltounderstandingwhyflowsofrhinohornaresodifficultto
disrupt.Thischapterdealswiththedemandforrhinohornbytracingthehistoricalrootsofits
valuationasasacredgoodwithstatus-elevatingqualities.Scholarshavelargelyfocusedonits
useinTraditionalChineseMedicine(TCM).138FromaWesternperspective,thedemandis
difficulttounderstandgivenscientificassessmentsofitsperceiveduselessnessinmedicinal
preparations.However,theancienthistoryofthecurativepropertiesofrhinohorndatesback
severalmillenniaandspansacrosstheOccidental,AfricanandOrientalrealm,evenextending
toEuropeanmythologiesoftheunicorn.Thechapterstartswithanexaminationofthe
physicalandchemicalpropertiesofrhinohornbeforedelvingintoaglobalhistoryof‘belief’
andancientformsofuse.Iconcludewithashortoverviewofcurrentuses,consumerprofiles
andproductdifferentiation.Whiletradestructureswereresearchedduringthisproject,they
areonlydiscussedinreferencetoflowsofrhinohorninlaterchaptersofthisdissertation.139
Achapterisincludedlaterinthedissertation(Chapter8)thatdealswithfakerhinohorndue
toitsimpactonthestructureandfunctioningoftheoverallmarket.Theaimofthischapteris
tocontributetoanuancedunderstandingofthevaluationofrhinohornasasacredgoodfor
whichconsumersarewillingtopayahighprice,whichmayultimatelyleadtotheunfortunate
extinctionofthepachyderm.
138Theterm‘traditional’medicineisusedwithcautioninthisdissertation.Streamofpolicyandacademicliteratureusethetermfrequentlywithoutacknowledgingthejuxtapositionof‘modern’versus‘traditional’.WhenIconducteddatacollectioninSoutheastAsiaandHongKong,Iaskeddoctors,academicsandpolicy-makerswhether‘traditional’wasindeedthecorrectlabel.Theresponsewasthattheuseoftheterm‘traditional’waslegitimateasitrelatedtoamillennia-oldtradition.ThejuxtapositionofWesternversustraditionalmedicinewascontroversial,however,asthedevelopmentofmodernevidence-basedmedicinewasaglobalachievement.139Mypostdoctoralresearchwilldelveintotradeanddistributionstructures,whichwerealsoresearchedduringthecourseofmyfieldworkinSoutheastAsia.Forreasonsofspaceandbrevity,thesetradestructuresareonlydiscussedinreferencetotransnationalflowsofrhinohorn.
123
3.2ThephysicalandchemicalpropertiesofrhinohornManymillenniaago,crashesofrhinosinmanyformsandsizeswereroamingacrossmostof
theplanet’sforests,savannahsanddeserts.Secondinsizeonlytoelephants,rhinosare
resilientandadaptableherbivores.TheforebearsoftheAfricanrhinospeciessplitfromthe
Asianone-hornedspeciesatthepeakoftherhinoevolutionabout17millionyearsago
(Borchert2012).Scientistsbelievethatmostrhinolineageswentextinctattheendof
Mioceneperiodaboutfivemillionyearsagowhenmassiveclimaticchangesoccurred
(Orenstein2013:25).
Oftheremainingfivespecies,thewhiteorsquare–lippedrhinocerosandtheblackrhinoceros
(Dicerosbicornis)liveinsouthernandeastAfrica.Theotherthreespecies(theIndian,Javan
andSumatranRhinos)surviveinAsia;althoughtheAsianspeciesareultimatelyoneofthe
triggersforthedemandforrhinohorninAsia,theyplayalimitedroleincurrentillegalflows.
ThetwoAfricanspeciesareneitherblacknorwhite;140theyaredifferentshadesofgray.
Whilerhinosarenotasasocialandsolitaryaspreviouslythought,theylackthecomplexsocial
structuresfoundinherdsofelephants(Orenstein2013:26).BlackRhinosareknownfortheir
“ferocity,chronicbadtemperandcunning”(Drummond1875:128);theovertlyaggressive
behaviour(suchaschargingwhentheyfeelthreatened)islinkedtotheirpooreyesight,
possiblyservingasadefencemechanism(Orenstein2013:27).
BothAfricanrhinospeciescarrytwohorns,whichserveas“theirchiefweaponsofdefence
andoffense”(ibid).Malerhinosusetheiranteriorhornstofighteachotherfordomination
andterritorialsupremacy.Thelongerandmoreslenderhornsoffemalerhinosareusedto
defendthemselvesandtheircalvesagainstpredators.Femalerhinosguidetheircalveswith
theirhornastheywalkinfrontofthem.Blackrhinosalsousetheirhornstobreakoff
branchestoreachbetterbrowsingortogreetoneanotherbywayofrubbinghornstogether.
140ThereisafairamountofconfusionaboutthedenotationofAfricanrhinospeciesas‘black’or‘white’.Onetheory(whichwasrepeatedandbecametheacceptedexplanation)suggeststhattheDutchword‘wijd’(wide)waswronglytranslatedtowhite(Feely:111).TravelerJohnBarrowwasbelievedtohaveappropriatedtheterm‘whiterhino’torecountGriquaAfrikaner’staleofhuntingsevengiraffesandthreewhiterhinocerosesinoneday(Walker/Walker2012:18).RecentresearchshowsthattheoldestwrittenDutchrecordsunequivocallyreferredto‘black’and‘white’rhinos(Feely:112).Anothertheorysuggeststhatthenamemightnotrefertotheappearanceofthetworhinospeciesbuttheirdifferenttempers(ibid).Whilethedebateofthesemioticoriginremainsunresolved,thenamesremainandhavebeenintegratedintolanguagetraditions.
124
Interestingly,scientistshavenotfoundaspecificexplanationfortheuseofthesmallerhorn
onbothrhinos(AfricaGeographic2012a:14).Unlikethetusksofelephants,rhinohornsgrow
atarateof6to10centimetresor0,6kgto1kginfemalewhiterhinosand0,8kgto1,5kgin
malewhiterhinosperannum(Interviewwithrhinobreedersandwildlifeveterinarians,2013).
Horngrowthiscontingentongender,sex,age,populationtype(i.e.free-rangeversus
captive-bred)andspecies(comparewith:Pienaar/Hall–Martin/Hitchens1991).Theanterior
hornisusuallythebiggerhorninbothspecies:shorterandsturdyinthewhiterhino,and
longerandnarrowerintheblackrhino.Underexceptionalcircumstances,anteriorhornsof
blackrhinosinthewildcangrowaslongas1,2meters(Interviewwithwildlifeveterinarian,
2012).
ThetwohornsontheAfricanrhino’sforeheadhavebecomeoneofthemostexpensive
commoditiesintheworld.Whatexplainsthehighcostofrhinohorn?Scientifictestsshow
thatrhinohornismadeupofkeratin–aconstituentsubstancefoundinhairandnails.It
would,however,beincorrecttosuggestthatrhinohorn,hairandnailsareidentical141asthe
chemicalcompositionofeachisdifferent(Patton2011:2).Rhinohorngrowsinlayersfrom
specializedskincellswithnocellularfunctions.Thecellsbecomekeratinized,inertand
hardened(Nowell2012a:1).Uniqueamonghornedanimals,therhinohornisnotan
extensionoftherhino’sskull.Asamatteroffact,rhinohornhasnobonycorebutconsistsof
afibrouscomposite(comparewithFigure1);itishence“anindependentlyderivedexample
ofacornifiedpapillaryepidermalappendage(Hieronymus/Witmer/Ridgely2006:1176).”
Toprotecttherhinohornagainstphysicalwearandtearitscoreisstrengthenedwithcalcium
saltswhilemelaninoffersprotectionagainstharmfulUVlightexposure(Nowell2012a:6).The
hornalsoconsistsofnuclearDNA,whichallowsforidentificationofindividualsand
traceabilitybymatchingofrhinocarcassestoconfiscatedhornsthroughDNA–analysis
(Harper2011:3).Theconicalshapeofthehornderivesfromrhinosconstantlyrubbingtheir
hornsontheground,andothersurfaces(AfricaGeographic2012b:16),andthedensercore
leadstothepointedstructureofthehorn(Yang2011:8).Theentirehorncanberemoved
141Severalconsumerawareness-raisingcampaignssuggestthatingestingrhinohornislikechewingone’sfingernails,seeforexamplehttp://envietnam.org/our-work/rhino-horn-trade-in-Vietnam.html(accessed18August2014)
125
surgicallywithasmallcuttingknifealongthesoftdermis,whichseparatesthehornfromthe
bonytissueoftheskull(Interviewwithwildlifeveterinarian1,2013)142orinthewordsofan
experiencedpoacher(Interviewwithpoacher17,2013):
“Thehornisnotattachedtotheskull.Itmoves,butitisabitrigid.Itislikeakneecap.Withapanga,143itcantakeovertenminutes.Butifitisanax,ittakeslessthan10minutes,fiveminutesorso.”
TheefficacyofrhinohorninTraditionalChineseMedicine(TCM)orTraditionalVietnamese
Medicine(TVM)144hasbeenthefocusofseveralscientificstudies;withmanymorebeing
conductedinVietnamandChinaatpresent(InterviewsinHongKongandVietnam,2013).
Rhinohornwastraditionallyusedfordispellingheat,coolingblood,relievingconvulsionand
counteractingtoxins(But/Lung/Tam1990:158).Recently,ithasbeenappliedtotreatahost
ofotherdiseasessuchascancer,strokeandimpotence(ĐỗTấtLợi1962;Anonymous2013)–
thenewusesarediscussedinthefinalsectionofthischapter.145Theappearanceand
chemicalcompositionofrhinohornaresimilar(butnotidentical)tothatofthehornsofwater
buffalos,cattle,yakandsaigaantelopes(Shengqing/Endong/Lijun2011),allofwhichareused
tosubstituteorfakerhinohorn.Intakingascience-basedapproach,thechemical
compositionofrhinohornmaybesignificantindeterminingthepharmacologicaleffectsof
rhinohorn.Keratintheconstituentcomponentofrhinohorn,forexample,isbelievedtobe
indigestibleinmammals,astherearenoknowndigestiveenzymes(so-calledkeratinases)
withtheabilitytohydrolysekeratininsidethehumandigestivetract(writtencommunication
withpathologist,2015).146Keratinasesarepresentincertainmicrobes,insectsandfungi
142Noscientificstudieswerefoundthatdescribetheimpactofremovingthehornoffaliverhinointhismanner.Removingthehornafewcentimetresabovethegrowthpoint(dehorning)ispracticedbysomeprivaterhinoownersinSouthAfrica,andinpublicparksinNamibiaandZimbabwe.143A‘panga’isamachete.Skilledpoachersuseknivestoloosenthehornoffthebaseplate.Unskilledpoacherstendtoresorttoaxesandpangas.144AlthoughtherearesomegeographicnuancesinthepracticeofTVM,TVMisessentiallyanoffspringofTCM.Thelabelof‘TCM’isappliedinscholarlyandpolicyliteratureonthematterandisusedforthepurposesofconsistencyandcontinuityinthisdissertation.145TheuseofrhinohornasanaphrodisiacwasaWesternmythuntilfairlyrecent.Thepracticeofusingrhinohorntocurbimpotenceandasasexualstimulantisanewdevelopment,specificallyinVietnam(Interviewswithconsumers,2013).146Bothpepsinandtrypsin,enzymesinthestomachandsmallintestinerespectively,cannothydrolyzekeratin.
126
(Gupta/Ramnani2006);147bezoars(hairballs)andtrichobezoars(theRapunzelsyndrome)can
leadtoobstructionsinthegastrictractandcausecomplicationsinhumans.However,bezoars
originatingfromthewaterbuffalo,oxorcowareprecious,expensiveandrareingredientsin
TCM.
Figure1:CTscanofawhiterhinoceros
Explanatorynote:Redareasshowdenserareasofmelaninandcalciumcontentwhiletheblueareasaretheleastdense.Thescanalsoshowsthatthehornsarenotboneprotrusionsoftheskull.
Source:Yang(2011:6)adaptedfromHieronymus/Witmer/Ridgely(2006)
Likerhinohorn,so-calledniuhuangisusedtoclearheatandtoxicity–andwhenusedin
conjunctionwithrhinohornorthehornofwaterbuffalo,ittreatslegionnaire’sdisease,
meningitisandencephalitis(Borten2014).Todate,nospecificexperimentshavebeen
conductedtotesttheoveralldigestibilityofrhinohorn(Nowell2012a:7).148Itisalsonot
knownwhichorwhethercomponentsofrhinohornneedtobedigestedtoachievecurative
effects.Rhinohorniseithergroundupwithabitofpurifiedorcoldboiledwaterinagrinding
bowl(seeFigure2),149orpoweredrhinohornistakeninconjunctionwithotherherbal
147TheTineafunguscaninfecthumantoenailsbywayofkeratinase,leadingtoathlete’sfoot(Nowell2012a:7).148Nowell(2012a:8),forexample,suggeststhatkeratinmightbedigestedinthealkalineenvironmentofthelargeintestineinsteadoftheacidicstomachenvironment.149Grindingbowlsaremadefromclay.Theclaybowlhasaserratedbottom(feelslikesandingpaper),whichfacilitatesthegrindingprocess.Thebowlscomeinmanyformsandsizes.TheresearchervisitedaceramicfactorynorthofHanoi,where‘organic’grindingbowlswereproduced.Accordingtotheceramicist(Interview,2013),affluentJapaneseandVietnamesebuyerswereorderingthesebowls.Hementionedthatconventionalgrindingbowlswerefinishedwithchemicalpaintsandstamps,whichunderminedthecurativepropertiesof
127
ingredients.Theprocessofgrindingthehornandtheadditionofsupplementaryingredientsis
believedtofacilitateabsorption(InterviewswithTCMdoctors,2013).
Possiblythemostwell-knownseriesofscientificstudiestodatewereconductedbyProfessor
ButandhisresearchteamattheChineseUniversityofHongKonginthe1980s,andpublished
in1990and1991respectively.Thestudiesfoundthatrhinoceroshornextractdemonstrated
antipyretic(fever-reducing)activitiesinratsbutsodidwaterbuffaloextractandtheherbal
mixtureusedinQingyingDecoction150withoutrhinohornasanactiveingredient(But1991).
Figure2:Rhinohorngrindingbowls
Source:TakenbytheresearcherduringfieldworkinVietnam151
Highervolumesofwaterbuffaloandcattlehornhadtobeusedtoachieveantipyreticeffects,
whichisconsistentwithclaimsofChinesedoctorsthatadosageofwaterbuffalohornhadto
beincreasedtenfoldtoachievethesameeffectasrhinohorn(But/Lung/Tam1990:165,
InterviewwithTCMdoctors,HongKongandVietnam,2013).Interestingly,theinjectionsof
thehornofsaigaantelopeintofebrileratsachievedstrongerantipyreticeffectsthanrhino
rhinohorn.MechanicalgrindingmachinesweresoldinmarketplacesinHanoiandHoChiMinhCity–similarinappearancetomanualmeatgrinders.150RhinohornisoftenusedincompoundprescriptionssuchastheQingyingDecoction.FirstmentionedinWu’s1798classicworkWenbingTiaobian(ItemizedDialecticAnalysisofFeverishDiseases),theprescriptionisusedtotreatfeverishdiseasesandcontainseightherbsandrhinohorn(But1991:46).151Thefirstimagedepictsanorganicgrindingbowl,whichcomeswithahigherpricetagthantheconventionalgrindingbowlpicturedinthesecondphoto.
128
hornathighdosages(But/Lung/Tam1990:162).Butandhiscolleagues(1990:166)warned
thatfurtherstudieswerenecessarytodifferentiatebetweenthetwohornsastherewere
differingconceptualandsubjectivemeaningsunderpinningtheuseofeachinChinese
pharmacopeia.152Inabidtocurbrhinopoachinginthe1990s,conservationgroups
encouragedsaigahuntinginsteadandpromotedtheuseofitshornasaviablealternativeto
rhinohorn(Pearce2003;Ellis2013:140).Oncenumerousacrossthevaststeppesofcentral
Asia,thenumbersofsaigaantelopedroppedduetoillegalhuntingfrom1.250.000inthemid-
1970stoanestimated50000mostlyhornlessfemalesatpresent(TheIUCNRedListof
ThreatenedSpecies2014b).Thefateofthesaigaantelopeisdiscussedinmoredetailinthe
chapterdealingwithfakeandersatzrhinohorn(seeChapter8).
AttherequestofboardmemberLucHoffmann(alsoco-founderoftheconservation
organizationWWF),thepharmaceuticalcorporationHoffmann-LaRocheconductedaseriesof
experimentstotestthepharmacologicaleffectsofrhinohornfromAugust1980toFebruary
1981.Aftertheresultsof“thespecialpharmacologicalstudyofrhinohorn”hadbeenreleased
tothepublic,theformerdirectorofconservationatWWF(AnonymousauthorforThe
Environmentalist1983)issaidtohaveremarked:
“Youwouldgetthesameeffectfromchewingyourownfingernails.”
Thenegativetestresultsweredisseminatedtoawideaudience(AnonymousauthorforThe
Environmentalist1983;Nowell2012a;Ellis2013:238).However,thearticlewasneverpeer-
reviewedorpublishedinascientificjournaldetailingfindingsandmethods(thusallowingfor
thereproducibilityandscientificscrutinyoftheexperiments).Thisomissionhasledtosome
actorssuggestingthatthe‘study’mayhavebeenapublicitystunt(Interviews,2013and
2014).153Asitturnsout,scientistsattheRocheBaselandWelwynlaboratoriesdidindeed
conductaseriesofexperiments,testingthepowderedhornofawhiterhinoforantipyretic
andanti-bacterialeffectsinstress-inducedrats.Theresultswerecomparedwiththeeffectsof
152Rhinohornisthusconsideredsuperiorin“coolingbloodandcounteractingtoxins”whilesaigahornisbettersuitedfor“coolingliverandquenchingwind”(But/Lung/Tam1990:166).153Theexperimentswereportrayedas“aspecialpharmacologicalstudyofrhinohorn”(AnonymousauthorforTheEnvironmentalist1983).Suchstudiesareusuallysubjecttoscientificscrutinybypeersandfellowscientists.
129
paracetamol,apharmaceuticaldrugcommonlyusedtoreducefever.Rhinohorntested
inactive(negative)forantipyreticandanti-bacterialactivities(Protocolofexperiments
providedbyRochetotheauthor,2014).Sincetherewerenoplanstodeveloppharmaceutical
drugscontainingrhinohorn,theseriesofexperimentswereatypicalofthediagnosticwork
usuallyundertakenatthepharmaceuticalgiant(Telephonicinterviewwithrepresentativeof
LaRoche,August2014).AstheinitialscreeningresultssupportedHoffmann’shypothesis(that
rhinohornhadnofever-reducingoranti-bacterialqualities),theexperimentswere
abandoned.Allthatremainsisabriefentryofthescreeningresultsinalaboratoryjournalin
thecompanyarchivesofRoche.154
In2012,TRAFFIC-affiliatedresearcherKristinNowellconductedacomprehensiveliterature
reviewandsurveyofNGOinformationonthegeneralpharmacologicaleffectsofrhinohorn
fortheCITESSecretariat.Inrelationtothehandfulofscientificstudiesexamined,155Nowell
(2012a:38)remarked“starkgeographicdifferencesinthepatternofresults”withChinese
researchersdocumentingantipyreticandanti-inflammatoryeffectsofrhinohorn.Twotests
thatwereperformedinSouthAfrica(Laburn/Mitchell1997)andtheUnitedKingdom
(Bell/Simmonds2006)foundnopositiveresults.Thesedifferencesmaybelinkedto
methodologicaldifferencesandperhapstowhatNowell(2012a:38)describedas“publication
biasforpositiveresults”.Itisimportanttonotethatthestudieswerelookingatsubstituting
rhinohornwithotherhornorplant–basedmedicines,thusnotactivelypromotingtheuseof
rhinohorn.Onedouble-blindstudyundertakenatahospitalinTaiwanin1993examined
rhinohorn’santipyreticeffectinhumans(Tsaiquotedin:Nowell2012a),withrhinohorn
154Theseriesofexperimentswouldnotmeetthemodernstandardsofascientificinvestigationorclinicaltrials(whichwasnottheintention)buttheywereundertakeningoodfaithtoinformthedebatewithnofinancialbenefittoHoffmann-LaRoche.AccordingtoaseniorWWFrepresentative(Interview,2014),anyeffortstofurtherengagewiththeresultsofthe“study”andclaimsofthesupposedeffectivenessofrhinohornwouldonlyservethepurposeof“perpetuatingthemythofitsusefulness”.155Ofthesevenstudiesthatlookedintothefever-reducingcapabilitiesofrhinohorn,sixfoundrhinohorntolowerfeverinlaboratoryanimals.Onlyoneclinicaltrialinvolvinghumansubjectshadbeenconducted,whichisdiscussedinmoredetailinfootnote156.Fivestudiestestedforotherpharmacologicaleffects,includinganalgesic,antibacterial,sedative,anti-haemorrhagicandanti-inflammatoryeffects(Nowell2012a:16).AstudysponsoredbytheUKDepartmentforEnvironmentFoodandRuralDevelopmentandconservationgroupInternationalFundforAnimalWelfare(IFAW)foundrhinohorntobeinactiveasanantibacterial,antipyreticandanti-inflammatoryagent(Bell/Simmonds2006).This,however,wastheonlystudytoapplyinvitroratherthaninvivomethodologies(Nowell2012a:16).
130
achievingastatisticallysignificantreductionoffeverintoddlers15minutesafter
administration.156
Theresultsofthevariousstudiesarecontradictory.Theoutcomeappearstobecontingenton
thegeographiccontextandthechosenmethodologicalapproach.Whenevidence-based
scientificstandardsareappliedtotesttheefficacyofChinesemedicineinspecific,or
traditionalmedicinesingeneral,theytendtofallshortofacknowledgingvastepistemological
andontologicaldifferencesunderpinningthepracticesof‘traditional’versusevidence-based
medicine(Shea2006).Inlightoftheparadigmaticdifferences,Sheawarnsofthedangersof
oversimplificationofanextensiveancientknowledgesystemthroughtheapplicationof
scientificstandardslinkedtothepracticeofevidence-basedmedicine.Forexample,thereare
enormousdifferencesinthepathologiesoffeverunderpinningevidence-basedmedicineand
TCM.FebrilediseasesinTCMcanmanifestwithoutanincreaseinbodytemperaturewhereas
theyarelinkedtoanincreaseinbodytemperatureinevidence-basedmedicine(Patton2011:
4).Itstandstoarguethatperhapsnotonlychemicalsubstancesbutalsootherfactors157
contributetotheputativeefficacyofrhinohornmedicines.
Althoughthissub-sectionhasdifferentiatedbetween‘evidence-based’medicineandTCM,it
needstobepointedoutthatregisteredTCMdoctorsinVietnamundergothesamesixyears
ofbasicmedicaltrainingasconventionalmedicalpractitionersbeforespecializinginthefield
ofTCM.ElsewhereinAsia,traditionaldoctorsalsoundergorigorousprofessionaltrainingof
sevenyearsormore(InterviewswithTCMdoctors,HongKongandChina,2013and2014).
Moreover,TCMequallyreliesonyearsofevidence-basedtrialsandresearchforthe
developmentofTCMpharmaceuticalproducts(InterviewswithTCMandTVMpractitioners,
156Nowell(2012a:10–11)summarizedthedetailsofthestudyasfollows:142childrenagedbetween3and114months,sufferingfromfever(averageof39.2°Celsius)weregivenrhinohorn,waterbuffalo,aplacebooracetaminophen(ananti-inflammatorydrug)mixedwithwaterbymeansoforaladministration.Acetaminophenachievedthebestresultswhilerhinohornachievedastatisticallysignificantreductionafterthefirst15minutesbutthereductionstoppedthereafterandendedwitha0.4°Creductionoverall.57%ofthechildrenwhoweregivenrhinohornendedupwithtemperatureslowerthan38.5°Candnofollow-uptreatmentwasnecessary.Tsaifound“sincetheRhinoisgoingtoextinctionandantipyreticefficacyofrhinohornislesseffectivethanacetaminophen,rhinohornisnotrecommendedforisolateduseinfebrilechildren”(TsaiquotedinNowell2012a:11).157The‘placeboeffect’hasbeendocumentedinscientificliterature,showingthatsomepatients’beliefinthetherapeuticqualitiesofmedicinemayleadtoanimprovementintheircondition.Foraninvestigationofthe‘placeboeffect’inalternativemedicines,seeKaptchuk(2002).
131
HongKongandVietnam,2013).TCMdoctorsareprovidingbasicandadvancedhealthservices
toagreatportionoftheSoutheastandEastAsianpopulation.Ridiculingthemas“snakeoil
salesmen”,“quacks”or“charlatans”(excerptsfromsocialmedia)showslittleunderstanding
ofthemethodologiesandancientpracticeofTCM.ItisimportanttonotethatChinabanned
theuseofrhinohornintheTCMpharmacopeiain1993.Thebanisstillinplace.TCMdoctors
andpharmacistsinterviewedinthecourseofthisresearchprojectacknowledgedthecurative
qualitiesofrhinohorn;somewereactivelyprescribingittopatientssufferingfromanumber
ofailments(discussedinthefinalsectionofthischapter).Severalsubstitutessuchasthehorn
ofwaterbuffalo,yakorsaigaantelopeandherbalmedicineswereactivelypromotedinlieuof
usingbodypartsofendangeredanimalspecies.
Inconclusion,thephysicalandchemicalcompositionofrhinohornfailstoexplainits
valuationandthehighprice.Aswillbeshownlaterinthischapter,thescientificproofisof
littleconsequencetopatientswhotrusttheirdoctorsandsupporttheancientpracticeof
traditionalmedicine,orwhoaresimplyseekingamiraclecuretohealorstopthespreadof
cancer,fortheirlovedonesorthemselves.Inaddition,rhinohornuseinVietnamrangesfrom
detoxifier/hangovercuretostatussymbol.Itwillbearguedthatthedifferentusesare
interlinkedbyvirtueofthehorn’svaluationasanextraordinary,sacralgoodtraditionallyused
inmedicinalpreparations.
3.3Aglobalhistoryintothemythologyoftherhino
Ofsignificancetounderstandingthevaluationofrhinohornasasacralgoodistheancient
historyofitsuseasamagicalpotion,linkingtoglobalmythsofrhinos,unicornsandalicorns.
Thefollowingsectionhighlightsbeliefsystemsandculturalmeaningsattachedtotherhino
anditshorn.
Rhinofossilsdatingbackmorethan60millionyearshavebeenfoundinNorthAmerica,
Europe,AfricaandAsia.Theearliestcavepaintingsdepicting53imagesofthewoollyrhino
datebacksome30000yearsagowerediscoveredintheChauvetcaveinthevalleyof
ArdecheinFrance(ClottesOctober2002).TheLascauxcavesnearMontignacinFrancehost
132
anotherimageofthelong-extinctwoollyrhino,alsofromtheUpperPalaeolithicperiod,some
17000yearsago(Kleiner2009:9).Humanremainswerelaidtorestwiththoseofnowextinct
speciesofrhinoinpre-historiccaves(Briggs1931:277).AfterthelastIceAge,therewereno
rhinoslefttohuntorpaintinEurope(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:12)andtherhinoonlyrears
itshornagaininthewritingsofArabtravellerAhmadibnFadlan(towhomIreturnlater)in
the10thcenturyBCE.158Whenrhinohornbecameapopularantidotetopoisoningduringthe
16thcentury,Europeancavesandancientgravesitesweresearchedandemptiedofall
remainingrhinohorn(Briggs1931:277).
OntheAfricancontinent,theSanpeople159leftuniquerock-artdrawingsincavesstrewn
acrosssouthernAfrica,datingbackatleast14000years(Ouzman2001).Comparedtoother
imageryinrockart,thedrawingsandengravingsofrhinosareverydetailed,agreatervariety
ofengravingtechniquesareused,andrepeatedrubbingcanbeobserved(Ouzman2001:
245).160Therhinoandtheelandantelopewereofspiritualsignificance.Therubbingofthe
rockcarryingtheimageryislinkedtotheSan’sbeliefthatsomerocksactedasgateways
betweentheordinaryandspiritworlds(Ouzman2001:244).Archaeologistsattributethe
spiritualsignificanceoftherhinotoitssheerbodysize,itsaggressivenature(inthecaseof
theblackrhino)anditsroleintheSan’simmediateenvironment(Walker/Walker2012:11).
Thegoldenfoilofaone-hornedrhinowasfoundinoneofthreeroyalgravesinMapungubwe
(seeFigure3),aUNESCOworldheritagesiteinSouthAfrica,situatedonthesouthernbanksof
theLimpopoRiverborderingZimbabweinthenorthandBotswanatothewest.Thesmall
rhino(itis152millimetreslong)wascraftedbyanindigenouscivilizationthathaddeveloped158AconsciouschoicewasmadetouseaneutralcalendarterminologyinlieuoftheChristian-inspired‘AnnoDomini’and‘BeforeChrist’denotations.TheCE-denotationorCommonEraequatesthesameperiodasenvisagedby‘AnnoDomini’–“intheyearofourLord”andBCEreferstotheperiodbeforethecommon,currentorChristianera.Bothcalendarsomittheyear0andarenumericallyequivalent.159Dutschke(2015)problematizestheuseoflabelsandnamesdenotingFirstNationspeopleinsouthernAfrica.Thename‘Sanpeople’isappliedcollectivelyheretorefertotheindigenouspeoplesofSouthAfrica.DevelopmentworkersandWesternresearchersusedthetermtomoveawayfromthederogatorylabelof“bushmen”.Forthepurposesofthisdissertation,itisacknowledgedthatindigenouspeoplesrefertothemselvesbytheirchosennames,whichdepicttheirancientcultureandtraditions.Duetotherelianceonarchaeologicalresearchinthissection,therewasregrettablynoinformationavailableastospecificgroupidentities;thecollectivedenotationof‘Sanpeople’wasthusapplied.160Itwasbelievedthattherubbingoftheimageswouldallowaccesstothepotencyoftheanimalinthespiritworld(Ouzman2001:245).
133
sophisticatedpolitical,socialstructuresandtraderelationsbythe13thcentury,161morethan
400yearsbeforethearrivalofEuropeancolonizers(York2012).162ArchaeologistHuffman
believesthatthefoilrepresentsablackrhino.
Figure3:ThegoldenrhinocerosofMapungubwe
Source:TimHauf/Corbis163
Knownforitsunpredictability,pugnaciousnessandpower,theassociationbetweenroyal
Zimbabweanleadershipandtherhinoappearsapt.164Therewere,atleast,anothertworhino
intheroyalgraveyard(Huffman2007:58).Itisnoteworthythattheblackrhinohadsymbolic
161Mapungubwewasabandonedafter400yearsofsettlementin1290CEduetotheonsetofthe‘LittleIceAge’,possiblyasevereboutofdroughtandthecentreofregionalpowerhadshiftedtoGreatZimbabwe(Carruther2006:2).162AlthoughthehillofMapungubweanditstreasureswere“discovered”byagroupoffivewhiteAfrikanersin1932(blackpeoplehadlongreveredthesite),therewasnoroomincolonialorapartheiddiscourseforablackcivilizationthatcreatedsophisticatedandcomplexwalledsitessuchasMapungubweorGreatZimbabwe.Thelandaroundthesitewasgiventowhitefarmersandthemilitaryduringtheapartheidperiod.CharactristicoftheMapungubwecivilization,thegoldenrhinobecamecelebratedonceapartheidhadbeenabolishedin1994andtheOrderofMapungubwehasbecomeSouthAfrica’shighestnationaldecoration,honouringexcellenceinscienceandcreativity(York2012).163Imageavailableathttp://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/17/british-museum-may-seek-loan-of-the-golden-rhinoceros-of-mapungubwe(accessed18August2015)164AlthoughtherewerewhiterhinosintheregionsurroundingMapungubwe,theextraordinarilyone-hornedgoldenrhinomighthavebeeninspiredbytalesofmerchantsfromChina,IndiaortheMiddleEast,whoweretradinggold,copper,ivory,hidesandrhinohornalongtheIndianOceancoastlineofsouthernandEastAfrica(Walker/Walker2012:11–13).
134
valueamongVendaandShona–speakingtribeslivingintheearlyShonastate.Boeyensand
vanderRyst(2014:25),forexample,describethesignificanceoftheceremonialpembera
dance(mimickingthemovementoftheblackrhinoknownaschipembereinShona).Theking
oftheMatupastateandhiswarriorswouldactouttheritualdancetodeterminewhowasthe
mostaccomplishedandcourageouswarrior.Thejuxtapositionofthebehaviouralattributesof
theblackrhino(suchasdangerous,unpredictableandpowerful)withtheleadershipstyleof
theancientleadersofMapungubweandGreatZimbabwehasbeenasserted(Huffman2007:
58).ThesacredpembelaritualorrhinocerosdanceinVendacultureisequallylinkedto
chieftainship(Boeyens/vanderRyst2014:26).TherhinoscapturedinSanrockart,andthe
goldenrhinoofMapungubwesignifythedeepconnection,reverenceandculturalsignificance
oftherhinointhosedays.
ReturningtotheearliermentionedAhmadibnFadlan,whoappearstohavecapturedthefirst
writtenrecordoftherhinobasedonhisjourneyfromBaghdadtotheVolgaregionin922CE.
Heobservedrhinosinthewildernessandfoundthreelargebowlsmadeoutofhorn
(ostensiblyrhinohorn)attheking’spalace(Walker/Walker2012:8).Ctesias,theGreek
privatephysiciantoKingsDariusIIandArtaxerxesIofPersia,givestheearliestWestern
accountoftherhinointhefifthcenturyBCE.165Hisdescriptionoftheone-hornedcreaturesis
widelyinterpretedtorepresentaninspiredcombinationoftheIndianrhinoandIndianass
(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:13).InthewordsofCtesias(quotedinShepard1930):
"ThereareinIndiacertainwildasseswhichareaslargeashorses,andlarger.Theirbodiesarewhite,theirheadsdarkred,andtheireyesdarkblue.Theyhaveahornontheforeheadwhichisaboutafootandahalfinlength.Thedustfiledfromthishornisadministeredinapotionasaprotectionagainstdeadlydrugs.Thebaseofthishorn,forsometwohands'-breadthabovethebrow,ispurewhite;theupperpartissharpandofavividcrimson;andtheremainder,ormiddleportion,isblack.Thosewhodrinkoutofthesehorns,madeintodrinkingvessels,arenotsubject,theysay,toconvulsionsortotheholydisease[epilepsy].Indeed,theyareimmuneeventopoisonsif,eitherbeforeorafterswallowingsuch,theydrinkwine,water,oranythingelsefromthesebeakers.Otherasses,boththetameandthewild,andinfactallanimalswithsolidhoofs,arewithouttheankle-boneandhavenogallintheliver,butthesehaveboththeankle-boneandthegall.Thisankle-bone,themostbeautifulIhaveeverseen,islikethatofanoxingeneralappearanceandinsize,butitisasheavyasleadandits
165SomescholarssuggestthatCtesiasgavethefirstWesternaccountoftheunicorn,whichinfluencedmanyartists’renditionsofthemysticalfigmentoftheirimagination.Itis,however,acceptedthattheIndianrhinoceros(rhinocerosunicornis)inspiredtheGreekdoctor’svividdescription(Nichols2011:128–129).
135
colouristhatofcinnabarthroughandthrough.Theanimalisexceedinglyswiftandpowerful,sothatnocreature,neitherthehorsenoranyother,canovertakeit."
Whiletheaccountisembellishedandmythical,itissignificantinshowingthatrhinohornhas
beenattributedwithspecialhealingpropertiesovermanycenturies(Martin/Martin/Amin
1982:13).Noanimalhasbeenshroudedinasmanymythsandmythcreationastherhinohas.
Adiverseassortmentofone-hornedbeastswassprinkledacrossancientChinese,Egyptian,
Babylonian,IndianandAssyrianmythology,theBible,andGreekandRomanfables
(Prothero/Schoch2002:277).Acrosstheages,therhinohasoftenbeencomparedand
confusedwiththemythicalunicorn.EvenscholarslikeAristotle,PlinyandLeornardodaVinci
firmlybelievedintheexistenceoftheunicorn.Foralongtime,RomansandGreeksupheld
thebeliefthattheunicorn(monocerostotheGreekandunicornistotheRomans)was
differenttotherhinosincetherewasahugemarketforthehornsoftheunicornfromChina
duetoitsmedicinalproperties.BythetimesofthelateAntiquity,theuseofrhinohorn
derivedfromtheone-hornedAsianvarietieshadbeenfirmlyestablishedintheEast
(Prothero/Schoch2002:277),sotheEuropeansmostcertainlywerenotconsumingunicorn.
BeforeEuropeanshadseenactualrhinos,talesofthebeastfedtheirphantasyandledto
bizarremythssuchasrhinosbeingimpartialtomusicandperfume.166Inthe6thcenturyCE,
SaintIsidoreofSevilledeclaredthemonoceros,unicornandrhinocerostobethesame
creature:
“Therhinoceros(rhinoceron)isnamedwithaGreekword;inLatinitmeans‘hornofthenose’.Thisisalsothemonoceron,thatis,theunicorn(unicornus),becauseithasasinglefour-foothorninthemiddleofitsforehead,sosharpandstrongthatittossesintheairorimpaleswhateveritattacks.Itoftenfightswiththeelephantandthrowsittothegroundafterwoundingitinthebelly.Ithassuchstrengththatitcanbecapturedbynohunter'sability,but,asthosewhohavewrittenaboutthenaturesofanimalsclaim,ifavirgingirlissetbeforeaunicorn,asthebeastapproaches,shemayopenherlapanditwilllayitsheadtherewithallferocityputaside,andthuslulledanddisarmeditmaybecaptured(BishopIsidoreofSeville[6thCenturyAD]:252).”
AstherewaslittlecontactbetweenEurope,AfricaandChinaduringthemedievalperiod,the
166Accordingtothemyth,ifamanweretodressuplike“ahighlyperfumedvirgingirl”hewouldbeirresistibletotherhino.Shouldthedisguisefail,hethenshouldclimbontotheclosesttreeandurinateintherhino’seartoavertfurthercharges.Suchmythsmayhavebeenbasedontalesbyfellowtravellerspassingthroughcolonialentrepôts(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:13).
136
classicalknowledgeoftherhinoconvergedwiththeunicornlegend.Itwascommonlyheld
thattheunicornwasendowedwithmammothstrength,whichwasconcentratedinitshorn
(ibid).Contaminatedwatercouldbeclarifiedifstirredwiththehornofaunicorn–amethod
thatwascalled“waterconning”(Mould1996:130).Manyfables,fairytales,paintingsand
tapestries(theMetropolitanMuseumofArtinNewYorkishosttoaseriesofseventapestries
entitledThehuntoftheunicorn)attesttothepopularityoftheunicorn,whichbecamea
symbolofpurityandchastityduringthemedievalperiodandRenaissance.Itisperhapsnot
surprisingthatthehornoftheunicornbecameknownasapowerfulaphrodisiacandwas
usedforvirginitytesting.NoneoftheclassicalmedicalauthorsintheOccidentaltradition
mentionedtheunicornanditscurativepropertiesuntilHildegardofBingeninthe12th
century.Accordingtothemedievalmedicandnun,anointmentmadeofpoweredunicorn
livermixedwitheggyolkscuredleprosy,abeltmadeofunicornhidewornaroundthewaist
protecteditsowneragainstthePlague,feversandsorefeet,anditshoofcoulddetectpoisons
(Throop1998).167Allalong“unicorn”pieces,fragmentsandhornswereusedtotestfoodand
beveragesofthewealthyandroyalsforpoisoning,andabbeys,churchesandprincipalities
werestockpilinghorns,whichweretreasuredpossessions,signifyingstatusandopulence
(Mould1996:130–131).AsnoEuropeanhadseenlions,elephants,panthersorunicornsat
thistimeinhistory,theywereequallycontentandunquestioningintheiracceptanceofthe
existenceofallthesecreatures(Shepard1930:29).
AccordingtoProtheroandSchoch(2002:278),themysticismsurroundinghornsmaybe
linkedtothecurativepropertiesassociatedwiththeimportedtusksofthenarwhal,asmall
articwhale.Thesetuskscanreachalengthofupto3meters168andwerefirstintroducedby
ScandinavianfishermenuponreturningfromexpeditionstotheArctic.WhileArcticwhalers
harpoonedsomenarwhals,mostofthepreciousresourcederivedfrombarteringtradewith
Inuithunters(Ellis2013:83).ApothecariesacrossEuropeproceededtomarketnarwhalhorn
167HildegardofBingenwroteextensivelyabouttheunicornfable,elaboratingherversionofthevirgin-capturelegendandsuggestingtheunicornwassymbolicofJesusChrist.168Unicornwhales(astheyarealsoknown)preferthedeepwatersoftheAtlanticArcticOcean.Whiletheimpactofglobalwarmingandhuntingisnotknown,theIUCNregardstheirpopulationsasstable.Narwhalsarehunted,andtheirtusksaretradedinGreenlandandCanada.Greenlandhashoweverbannedtheexportofthenarwhal’sivory(TheIUCNRedListofThreatenedSpecies2014a).
137
asunicornhornandsolditforitssupposedmedicinalproperties.Asnarwhalswererarely
seensouthofGreenland,theirexistenceremainedtheScandinavianseafarer’sbest-kept
secretfornearly500yearswhiletheywereselling‘unicorn’worthseveraltimesitsweightin
gold(Winick2014).Thehornoftheunicorn,oralicornasitcametobeknown,waslikewise
imputedwithmagicalpowerssuchascounteractingtoxinsandcuringmelancholia.
Apothecarieschaineddownthevaluabletusksandsoldshavingstoaffluentcustomers.169
Alicornwasalsoconvertedintocupsthatwerethoughttoneutralizeanypoisonsslippedinto
beveragesconsumedoutofthecups.Othertypesof‘unicorns’usedinEuropeanapothecaries
wereprobablyIndianrhinohorninpowderedform,prehistoricmammothivoryandfossils
(Mould1996:131).Thevalueofalicorndependedonavailablesupplies.Atthepeakofthe
market,piecesandpowderofalicorncouldsellforuptotentimestheirweightingoldwhile
entirehorns(whichwererare)couldbeworthdouble(ibid).Aswastobeexpected,shrewd
entrepreneursforgedtheexpensivecommoditybysubstitutingalicornwiththehornof
domesticatedanimalsandwalrus,whalebones,stalactitesandlimestone.Toprotect
prospectivebuyers,severaltestsweredevisedtochecktheauthenticityofthealicorn
(ibid).170Chapter8discussesthehighincidenceoffakehorninmodernmarketsandnovel
waysoftestingitsauthenticity.
Unicornremainedofficiallyrecognizedasadrugtobestoredinregisteredpharmaciesin
Englanduntilin1741(Mould1996:131–132),171theFrenchcourtusedalicorntotestwhether
theroyals’foodanddrinkshadbeenpoisonedupuntiltheFrenchRevolution,QueenVictoria
IhadanalicornmountedinherbedroomatWindsorandevenPopeGregoryXIVwasoffered
poweredhornonhisdeathbedin1591(hediednonetheless)(Prothero/Schoch2002:278).
Thebeliefinthecurativepropertiesofalicornwassuchthatthesymboloftheunicorn
169AprinceofSaxonyissaidtohavepaidthesumofonehundredthousandthalersforasinglealicornwhiletheEnglishKingCharlesVpaidhisoutstandingdebttotheMargraveofBayreuthwithtwonarwhalhorns(Prothero/Schoch2002:278).170Onesuchtestinvolvedthesoakingofthesuspicioushorninwaterandthendrawingacirclearoundascorpionwiththesamewaters.Ifthescorpionremainedinsidethecircle,thenthealicornwasconsideredtobetherealdeal(Mould1996:131–132).171TheofficialdrugslistofitemstobekeptinstockbyregisteredpharmaciesinEnglandincludedunicornfrom1651to1741.Itwasdeletedfromthelistin1746(Mould1996:132).
138
becameassociatedwithpharmacopoeiasandapothecariesintheWesternworld(ibid).172
Despitethealicorn’swidespreadpopularity,doubtandscepticismaboutitsefficacybecame
widespreadwhenevidence-basedmedicinebecametheorderofthedayduringtheAgeof
Reason.WhiletheJapanesewereusingalicornforthetreatmentofimpotenceuntilthelate
18thcentury,demandhadtaperedoffbythe18thcenturyelsewhereintheworld(Mould
1996:133).Asthepricedroppedsignificantly,thewealthymovedon,butthepoorcontinued
tobuyalicornforsometimeafterthat(Shepard1930:84).
Therhinowas‘rediscovered’inEuropeaftertheDarkAges.In1292,VenetianexplorerMarco
PolosawIndianrhinosduringhisexpeditionstoAsiaandrelatedthemtothefabledunicorn,
sincerelydoubtingwhetherrhinosandvirginmaidenswouldenjoypropinquity(Mould1996:
130).Finallyin1593,EuropeansgottoseetheirfirstliverhinogiftedtoKingManueltheGreat
ofLisbon,whoupontiringofitsentittoPopeLeoX.Theshipsankenroute,drowning
everyoneonboard,andthepopeeventuallyreceivedthestuffedandskinnedcarcass(an
earlytrophyofsorts)sometimelater(Prothero/Schoch2002:279).GermanpainterAlbrecht
Dürer(seeFigure4)wascrucialindisentanglingtherhinofromtheunicornthroughhis
famouswoodcut,whichwasbasedonadrawingofarhinobyaPortugueseartist(Dürernever
sawaliverhino)(Edwards2008:291).Themysticalelementremained,however,asDürer’s
rhinohadaunicornwithaspiraltwistprotrudingfromitsshoulders.
TherelianceuponhearsayandoraltraditionsisperhapsbestdemonstratedinEdward
Topsell’s‘Thehistoryoffour-footedbeastsandserpents’,anauthoritativenaturalhistory
bookfirstpublishedintheRenaissanceandreproducedinitsoriginalformoverseveral
centuries(Prothero/Schoch2002:279).Amongstthecolourfuldescriptionsofserpents,sea
monsters,unicornsanddragons,Topsellregardstherhinoas“thesecondwonderinnature”
(aftertheelephant).173Topsell(1658)explainsatlengthwhytheunicornandrhinoweretwo
distinctcreatures,alsorefutingthelongstandingmythofthemissingfemalerhino.Early
writersandphilosopherswereofthewrongfulbeliefthatonlymalerhinoswereroamingthe
planet(Keller1909:384).
172TheBritishpharmaceuticalcompanyBurroughsWellcome,forexample,usedtheunicornasitslogobetween1908and1995(Dorman2014).173Theprofileissprinkledwithcuriousdescriptions,suchas:“Onhisforeheadtheregrowhairswhichseemalittlered”;or:“Hisbackisdistinguishedwithcertainpurplespotsuponayellowground(Topsell1658).”
139
TheuseandtradeofrhinohorninEuropeappearstocoincidewithPortugueseseafarers
returningfromIndia.CasparBartholinusobservedthesaleofrhinohorninseveralItalian
citiesin1620,whereitwasprescribedforthetreatmentofpoisoning,fevers,small–pox,
epilepsy,vertigo,worms,impotenceandstomachache.Initiallyrhinohornwasnotaspopular
asalicornasthehornwastooshortandtheimageryoftherhinofailedtoinspirein
comparisontothemythicalunicorn.Thisattitudechangedoverthenextdecades.By1699,
PierrePometrecountsthatrhinohornwasusedinthebeliefthatitwouldbeaseffectiveas
alicorn(Shepard1930:176).
Figure4:AlbrechtDürer's'Rhinoceros'
Source:TheBritishMuseum174
Notsurprising,thefirstfewgenerationsofcolonialsettlersattheCapeofGoodHopeinSouth
Africasharedthosebeliefs.BotanistandavidtravellerCharlesThunberg(1793)observesthat
rhinohornswerekeptasrareornamentsandasameanstodetectpoison.Hewrote:
“Thefineshavingsofthehorns,takeninternally,weresupposedtocureconvulsionsandspasmsinchildren,anditwasfirmlybelievedthatgobletsmadeofthesehornsinaturner’slathewoulddiscoverapoisonousdraughtbymakingtheliquorferment.”
174Availableathttp://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/highlight_objects/pd/a/albrecht_d%C3%BCrers_rhinoceros.aspx(accessed18August2015)
140
Thedifficultiesassociatedwithtranslocatingrhinosinthosedaysprecludedascientific
investigationintothemythicalrhinoanditshornuntilthe19thcentury(Prothero/Schoch
2002:280).Itbearsmentioningthatmanyofthetraitsoftheunicornswouldhavebeen
derivedorembellishedfromstoriestoldbyrhinoceroshunters.Rhinoshavebadeyesight,but
theyhaveanaugmentedsenseofsmell,whichtallieswithelementsofthevirgin-capture
legend(Shepard1930:175).Aswillbeshowninthefollowing,rhinohornhadalonghistoryof
medicinalandalexipharmicuseintheEast.Scholarsoftheunicornlegendtendtoobjectto
thenotionsthattheunicorn,“ananimalofsuchdelicacyandrefinement”wouldbethesame
as“thegross,grunting,slime-wallowingrhinoceros”(Shepard1930:177).Theratherharsh
assessmentintimatescognitiveframesofyesteryear,someofwhichmayhaveaffected
moderndayperceptionsoftheancientcreature.
MuchoftheunicornandrhinomythologyintheOccidentseemstohavebeeninspiredby
talesfromtheFarEast,withtheearlier-mentionedCtesiasbeingthefirstofmanytravellersto
bringbackstoriesandobservations,whichwereeitherassimilated,adoptedorappropriated
intoWesternculturaltraditions.Supernaturaleventsassociatedwiththeunicorndatebackto
2600BCEinChinesemythology(Briggs1931:278).Theearliestrepresentationsoftheunicorn
werefoundonsealsinthenorthernIndusregiondatingbacktothesameeraaround2600
BCE(Abrahametal.2013:107).175TheunicornorsimilarapparitionsalsofeaturedinHindu
andBuddhistwrittenandoraltraditions.TheMahābhārataintroducedthelegendof
Rishyasringa,adeer–hornedanthropomorphiccreaturewhileBuddhistliteraturereferstothe
samecreatureasEkashringa(whichtranslatestounicorn)(Nichols2011:130).The
archaeologistresponsibleforexcavationsthatledtotheunearthingofvastareasoftheIndus
ValleyCivilizationintheearly20thcentury,SirJohnMarshallbelievedthattheunicornand
othermythicalcreaturesderivedfromitwereinspiredbytherhino(citedin:Abrahametal.
2013:122).Indusmerchantswerefrequentandlong-distancetravellers,whomayhave
spreadtheideaoftheunicorntoMesopotamiaandtheMiddleEast.Theoldestunicorn
bronzestatuefoundinthatregiondatesbacktothedaysoftheproto-Iraniancultureof
Amlasharoundthe9thto8thcenturyBC(Tagliatesta2007:176).Fromtheretheideaofthe
mythicalunicornmayhavegraduallydiffusedthroughtheMediterraneanregionfinally
175Scholarshavelongdebatedwhethertheanimalsdepictedonthesealsareunicornorbicorncreatures.Thedebatesareoflittlerelevancehere(Tagliatesta2007:175).ThesignificantaspectisthatSirJohnMarshallandotherarchaeologiststhoughtthatrhinosinspiredthedepictionofthesecreatures.
141
reachingcontinentalEuropeandbeyond(Abrahametal.2013:122).MedievalMuslim
scripturesalsodescribeawingedantelope-likecreaturewithahornonitsforeheadcalled
karkadan,theArabtermforrhinoceros(Ettinghausen1950:6).AccordingtotheShahnama
(theBookofKings),AlexandertheGreatslayedaunicorn-likecreaturefromthelandof
Habash(Ethiopia).Therearemanyaccountsofheroestriumphingoverwhatisoften
describedasamonstrousapparition,perhapsindicativeofhowhunterswereinaweofthe
rhino(Ettinghausen1950:36)–comparewiththenextsectionofthischapter.Theearliest
accountsofrhinohuntsdatebacktotheearliermentionedArabtravellerIbnFadlanin922
AD,whowastoldthatbowmenwouldclimbontopoftreesandkillrhinoswithpoisoned
arrowswhiletheywereasleep(Ettinghausen1950:45).
Arabwritersmentiondifferentusesofrhinohornduringtheearlymedievalperiod.Chinese
royalty,forexample,adornedthemselveswithgirdlesmadeoutofrhinohorn(Ettinghausen
1950:54)176orworenecklacesmadeofrhinohorntofendoffevilspirits(Ettinghausen1950:
55).Japaneseornamentsandcontainerswerecarvedoutofrhinohorn;throneswerecovered
withrhinohorn(notattachedtoaspecificgeographybutmostlikelyinreferencetoChina),
andthehandlesofmedievalMuslimknivesandswordsweremadeoutofrhinohorn
(Ettinghausen1950:56).Thedemandforhornseemstohavebeenmetbysuppliersfrom
IndiaandAfrica(ibid)withArabmerchantsbeingtheprincipalexporterstoChina
(Ettinghausen1950:101).Thereseemslittledoubtthattherhinoandunicornwereoneand
thesamecreatureinArabwritings.Asofthe1500s,theso–calledkarkadanisoftencompared
tobuffalo’sandthedomesticox.177Interestingly,theearliestreferenceinArabtextsofthe
antidotaleffectofrhinohornappearedtohavecoincidedwiththeEuropeandiscoveryofthe
curativepropertiesofalicorn(Ettinghausen1950:111).Beforethat,thehornofkhutuwas
reputedwithalexipharmicqualities(Lavers2009).Al-Qazwinimakesthefirstexplicit
suggestionoftheusefulnessofrhinohornindetectingtoxinswhilealsonotingitssuitability
176Duringthe10thcentury,aroyaldecreeabolishedthecustomofwearinggirdlesmadeofrhinohornandrequiredgirdlestobemadeofgoldandothervaluablematerialsinstead(Ettinghausen1950:55).Itisunclearwhatprecipitatedtheroyaldecree;however,itledtoamassivedropinthepriceofrhinohorn(ibid).177EvenSindbadtheSeafarerprovidesaninspireddescriptionofthekarkadan,whichheencounteredduringhissecondvoyage.Successivetranslatorsof‘ThousandandOneNights’appeartohaveembellishedthelengthofitshorntenfold(CompilationoffolktalesofMiddleEasternandIndiandescent1850):“Itisaremarkableanimalwithagreatandthickhorn,tencubitslong,amiddlewarditshead,wherein,whencleftintwain,isthelikenessofaman.”
142
forknifehandles.Latertextsconfirmthatifthehandlesofroyalkniveswerepleatedwith
rhinohorn,thentheywould“becomemoistandagitated”whenpoisonedfoodwasplacedon
thediningtable(Ettinghausen1950:131).Itseemssomewhatplausiblethatthismayhaveled
totheuseoftheceremonialdaggersintheArabpeninsula.Thehiltsoftheearliermentioned
jambiyaaremadewithrhinohorn(comparewiththesubsectiononjambiyasinthischapter).
Tothisday,theyareindispensabletothetraditionalattireofmenofNorthernYemenand
equallycovetedinOmanandSaudiArabia(Parker2013:Chapter19:6).
IngreaterIndia,hometotheone-hornedIndianrhino,therearemanyreferencestotherhino
asasacredanimalincludingAsokadeclaringitassuchinhisPillarEdicts,itsperceived
similaritytoGanesha(anIndiandeity)orthefamouschorus“Lethimwanderalonelikea
rhinoceros”fromtheSuttaNipata(aBuddhistscripture)(Briggs1931:280).Therhino
becameassociatedwithvirtueandwisdom(Keller1909:388),anditremainedhighlyvalued
asasacredanimalamongstyogisintothe20thcentury.Duringthepracticeofsunsalutations,
yogiswouldweararingmadeoutofrhinohornontherightindexfingerwhileothersadorned
theirearswithhugeringsmadeoutofrhinohornpulledthroughthecartilage.Yogisalsoused
powderedrhinohidefordustingopenwounds(Briggs1938:131–132).
Unliketheearliermentionedcommunitiesornations,theChinesedidnotconflatetherhino
withthemysticalunicorn.Itiscommonlyheldthattheunicornorki–linoriginatesfroma
distantplace,possiblyheaven,atirregularintervals.Accordingtothelegend,theunicorn’s
appearancecoincidedwiththereignorthebirthofagreatman(Shepard1930:66).The
rhino,ontheotherhand,isaccuratelydescribedasaseparatespecies,andsuppliersand
tradersofitshornneverattemptedtosellrhinohornaski–lin,renderingtheunicorna
mysticalcreatureuncontaminatedbytrade(Shepard1930:69).However,rhinoswererarely
seeninChinabythetimesoftheWesternHandynasty,andperhapstheirraritywouldexplain
whytheyacquiredmythicstatusinChinesesociety.Rhinocerosboneswerefoundatfossil
sitesdatingbacktotheNeolithicera(aboutsixthousandyearsago).VariousAsianspeciesare
believedtohaveflourishedinancientChina(Parker2013:Chapter16).Norhinossurvived
northoftheYangtzeRiverbythetimetheHandynasty(206BCE–220CE).WhentheTang
dynastyruledfrom618CEto907CE,rhinoslivedinanareasouthoftheYangtzeRiverandin
143
theregionsthatareknownasmodern-dayGuangdongandGuangxi(Laufer1914:137),and
mayhavesurvivedinSichuanuntilthemedievalperiod(Laufer1914:118).
Inancienttimes,theprimaryinterestintherhinoseemstohavebeenlinkedtoitshide
(Jenyns1954:39).TheGuoyu(‘DiscourseoftheStates’)recordedthat103,000troopsofthe
StateofWuwereequippedwitharmourmadeofrhinohidesandfish–scalesaround400BCE
(citedin:Parker2013).Whilethisaccountappearseversoslightlyembellished,Parker(2013:
Chapter16:5)interpretsthisasanindicationoftheexistenceofsignificantnumbersofrhino
inthesouthernregionsduringtheWarringperiod.Inthosedays,rhinoswerekilledfortheir
hide.Oncethehidehaddriedout,ithardenedandprovidedprotectionagainsttheweapons
oftheday.Deerantlersandrhinohornwerealsousedtoproducebowsinancienttimes
(Parker2013:Chapter16:5).Parker(2013:Chapter6:6)arguesthatrhinonumberswere
greatlyreducedduringtheWarringperiodduetoincreasingdemandforrhinohidearmour.
Moreover,gradualcoolingoftheclimateaffectedtherhino’shabitatandledtoasouthward
migrationinthedirectionofLaosandVietnam.TherelentlessslaughterduringtheEastern
ZhoudynastyledtothedemiseoftherhinoinChina,anditenteredtherealmoflegendsand
myths(Parker2013:Chapter16:6).
TheoldestChineseartpiecedepictingarhinoisanancientbronzewinevesselintheformofa
two–hornedrhino.Thevesselisbelievedtodatebacktothereignofthelastemperorof
Shangduringthefirsthalfofthe11thcenturyBCE(Sickman/Soper1971:30).Accordingto
Bretschneider(1875:19),Chineseclassicsfrequentlyrefertogobletsmadeoutofrhinohorn
andtherhinoingeneral.178ArthistorianJanChapman179arguesthattherituallibationcups
usedduringceremonieshonouringancestorsmayhavebeenmadeofAsianrhinohornbefore
bronzecameintouseinancientChinaaround2000BCE.Curiously,BronzeAgedrinking
vessels(madeoutofbronze)wereshapedintheformoftheirrhinohornprecursors
(Chapman1999:17).FromthedaysoftheEasternZhoudynasty(770–221BCE),carvers
createdintricatebowls,libationcupsandotherdecorationsoutofrhinohorn(Parker2013:
178ThesinologistbelievedthattheIndianandChineseuseofrhinohorninthedetectionofpoisonswasaseparatedevelopmentalbeitbothnationsstartedtheusageatapproximatelythesametime(Bretschneider1875:19).179ChapmanhaspublishedaseminalbookontheartofrhinohorncarvingsinChina‘TheArtofRhinocerosHornCarvinginChina’,whichdocumentsthehistoryandbeautyofancientcarvingsmadeoutofrhinohorn.
144
Chapter17:2).Unlikeotherhorns(antlersofantelopes,coworsheephorns),rhinohornwas
nothollowontheinsideandthuscouldbecarvedintocupsandbowls(Laufer1914:168).180
Libationcupswereusedfortheconsumptionofricewine(seeFigure5).Thebeliefwasthat
thecurativeelementsoftherhinohorn(analgesicandlifelengthening)woulddissolvefrom
thecupsintothewine.Thetwoancientusesofrhinohorn(decorationandmedicine)thus
wereintertwined(Parker2013:Chapter17:2).
Figure5:RhinohornlibationcuporiginatingintheQingdynasty
Source:Sotheby’s181
Asmentionedearlier,theofficialgirdlesofroyalmandarinswerestuddedwithpiecesofrhino
hornduringtheTangdynasty,whichlastedfrom618CEto905CE.Officialattireswereranked
intheorderofjade,gold,rhinohornandivoryduringtheKindynasty(1115–1234CE).The
emperorworeahat-pinmadeofrhinohornandagirdleofblackhornwhiletheimperial
saddleswerepleatedwithgold,silver,rhinohornandivory(Laufer1914:143).Thereisalsoa
religiouselementassociatedwithrhinohorninancientChina,asWangMing(33BCEto23CE)180Bovineandotherhornshavebeentransformedintodrinkingvesselsacrossdifferentcultures.However,usuallytheentirehornisused.181ThelibationcupdepictedintheimageoriginatesfromthetimesoftheQingdynasty(17/18thcentury).Adragonisthemainfeatureofthiscup.Thecupwassoldfor8420000HKDataSotheby’sauctioninHongKong.Theimageandmoreinformationareavailableathttp://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2011/rhinoceros-horn-carvings-from-the-edward-and-franklin-chow-collection-hk0370/lot.2714.html(accessed18August2015).
145
offeredbonesofstorks,tortoiseshellandrhinohorntotheGods(Jenyns1954:45).Jenyns
(1954:45)alsofoundreferencestorhinohornbeads,whichappearedtobelinkedtoholding
animportantofficeinancientChina.Themanufactureofrhinohornprayerbeads(Buddha
beads)andbangleswasobservedinHanoiin2013(Amman2013b),suggestingthatrhino
hornisstillimbuedwithtranscendentalandreligiousvalue.
Theoriginofrhinohorn’sprophylacticvaluationintraditionalmedicineisamatterofdebate.
Huang-tiNeiChing(‘TheYellowEmperor’sClassicofInternalMedicine’),thegenerational
knowledgeoftraditionalmedicinesissaidtohavebeencompiledbyHuang-tiaround2600
BCE.Theancientartofhealingwaspassedonorallyuntilitwasfinallycapturedinwritten
formaroundthe3rdcenturyCE.‘Preventionismoreimportantthancure’wastheunderlying
philosophyoftheNeiChing.Anyhealthissueshadtobeaddressedbylookingatthebodyas
aninterdependentorganicsystem.Itadvocatedtheconsumptionofcertainfoodstoadjust
imbalances;however,noanimalsubstancesorherbswereincludedintheearlyversions(Ellis
2013:35–39).TheChenNungBenCaoChienor‘TheHerbalClassicoftheDivinePloughman’
waspublishedaround100BCE,recommendingtheuseof365differentherbsandanimal
substancesforeachdayoftheyear(Huang1998:3).Itsoriginistracedbacktothemythical
emperorChenNung,whowasbelievedtohavelivedaround2700BCE.Theclassicwork
classifiespowderedrhinohornasacolddrug,whichissuitableforcoolingbloodfromhot
diseases(Parker2013:Chapter17:1)andit“curesthehundredpoisons”(Bretschneider1910:
153).ItisacceptedthattheChineseuseofrhinohornformedicinalpurposesdatesbackto
thetimesofChenNung.Medicinaluseofrhinohornthusdatesbacktoapproximately2700
BCE,renderingitanancientpractiseofmorethan4800years.JeanieParker,theauthorof
‘ThemythicChineseunicorn’,foundmanywrittenreferencesabouttheantidotalpropertiesof
rhinohornduringtheBronzeAgeinChina.Forexample,shenotedthatthezhenbird(the
‘poison-featherbird’)andtherhinolivedinthesamesouthernregionsduringtheSpringand
AutumnPeriod.Poisoncouldbeextractedbypouringricewineoverthefeathersofthezhen
bird.182ThelinkbetweentherhinoandthezhenbirdwasconfirmedinthePiYaduringthe
Songdynasty(960–1279CE),whichstatedundertheentryofthepoison-featherbird:“The
182AnornithologistconsultedbyParkerbelievesthatthezhenmaybethecrestedserpenteagle,aspeciesthatisspreadacrosshugepartsoftropicalcontinentalAsia(Parker2013:Chapter18:2).
146
onlythingthatcancounteractthispoisonisrhinoceroshorn(quotedinParker2013:Chapter
18:1).”183
TaoistphilosopherGeHong(quotedin:Laufer1914:137–138)providesanintriguingaccount
ofrhinohorninthe4thcenturyCE,suggestingthatthehorncouldcommunicatewiththesky.
KoHungassertsinBaopuzi(‘TheMasterwhoembracessimplicity’)underthesectiondealing
with“Methodtobeusedinordertowalkonwaterorstaylongunderwater”:
“The(rhino)hornismadeintoahairpin.Whenpoisonousmedicinesofliquidformarestirredwiththehornhairpin,awhitefoamwillbubbleup.Afterthefoamhasbubbledup,theharmfuleffectofthepoisonisgone.Whennon–poisonoussubstancesarestirredwiththehornhairpin,nofoamwillrise.Inthismannerthepresenceofpoisoncanbeascertained(translatedby:Parker2013:Chapter18:4).”
Whatisofparticularinterestishisexplanationastowhyrhinohorniscapableofneutralizing
poison.Heestablishesalinkofthe“horncommunicatingwiththesky”anditsalexipharmic
propertiesduetotherhino’sdietconsistingofpoisonousplantsandtrees(Jenyns1954:
41).184Thesymbolismattachedtotherhinohorn’scelestialconnection185mayhave
183TheentryinthePiYadescribesthepoison–featherbirdasfollows:
“Ifthereisazhenbirdwithpoisonedfeathers(becauseiteatspoisonoussnakes),andyoudiptheminwine,youwillproducepoison.Thezhenbirdlookslikeagoosebutitscolourisdarkpurple.Itsbeakis7–8cun(Chineseinch)longandcopper–coloured.Iteatssnakeswhichdissolveititsmouth.Ifthedroppingsofthezhenbirdtouchstone,thenthestonewilldissolve.Thefeathershavepoison.Iftheyaremixedinwinethenpoisonisproduced.Theonlythingthatcancounteractthispoisonisrhinoceroshorn.Thereforeintheplacewherethezhenbirdlives,therearealsorhinos(Parker2013:Chapter18:1).”
184SeveralTCMdoctorsconsultedduringdatacollectioninAsialikewiseexplainedtherhinohorn’salexipharmicanddetoxingpropertiesinreferencetotheAsianrhino’sdiet.Accordingtotheintervieweddoctors(Interviews,VietnamandHongKong,2013),Asianrhinoswerefeedingonpoisonousleaves,shrubsandfruitsintropicalrainforests.Unlikecattle,deerorbuffalo,therhinocandigestthesepoisonoussubstances;itshornishenceregardedasanexcellentantidotetopoisons.DoctorspreferAsianrhinohornastheAsianspecies’dietconsistslargelyofmedicinalplantsandherbs,renderingthehornmorepotentandsuperiorintermsofhealingproperties.ThedietsofAfricanspecieswerecheckedforthepurposesofverification.Thewhiterhinoisapuregrazer,survivingongrasswhiletheblackrhino’shookedupperlipallowsittopullofftwigs,branchesandfruitfrommorethan200differentvarietiesoftreesandshrubs(Gibson2015).ManyoftheseplantsareusedinAfricanmedicines(Interviews,2013).Scientistsalsofoundthatdesert-adaptedblackrhinosinNamibiawerelivingonadietrichinthepoisonoussucculentEuphorbiadamaran,alsoknownasmilkbush(Lehmannetal.2013;Luskeetal.2009).Whiletheblackrhinomayhaveamulti-faceteddietthatincludesmedicinalandpoisonousplants,thetraditionaldoctors’preferenceswerebasedongenerationalknowledgeandtraditions,aswellastheirenvironmentalmilieu.Otherpreferencesincludedfreshversusoldhorn(butitneedstobeprocessedassoonaspossible);thehornoftheIndianrhinospeciesversushornfromtheothertwoAsianspecies(whicharetinkeringonthebrinkofextinction);ideallythehornshouldbeharvestedatthepeakofarhino’slife(atmid-agewhentherhinoisabout20yearsold)–preferablyfromaliveanimalastheefficacyofthemedicine
147
contributedtotheunicorn’ssanctityinEurope,wherethehealingpowersofalicornwere
veneratedinchurchesandmonasteriesmorethanonethousandyearslater(Parker2013:
Chapter26:1).
Datingbackfromthe11thtothe7thcenturyBCE,theChijing(theancient‘BookofSongs’)
providespoeticevidencethattherhinowasindeedhuntedinancienttimes.186Laufer(1914:
160)quotesametaphoremployedbysoldierscomplainingabouttheirowncrueltreatment:
“Wearenotrhinoceroses,wearenottigers,tobekeptinthesedesolatewilds.”Oncethe
localreservesofrhinohadbeendepletedduringtheHandynasty(206BCE–220CE),Roman
andArabtradersstartedsupplyingtheChinesemarketswithrhinohorn(Jenyns1954:41).
RhinohorncupshadbecomepreciousartefactsduringtheWesternHandynastyandwere
buriedwiththeirowners.Thoselessfortunatewereburiedwithimitationrhinohorncups
madefromclayorwood(Parker2013:Chapter19:1).Chapman(1999:15)foundevidence
thatChineseentrepreneurscreatedforgeriesofhorncarvings,cupsandgirdlesasearlyasthe
14thcentury,oftensubstitutingrhinohornwiththemuchcheaperhornofthewater
buffalo.187Withthedepletionofrhinonumberscamethesacralisationormythical
transformationoftherhino.Artisticrepresentationsbecamerepletewithimagesofthe
mythicrhinoceros–unicornsandrhinohornwasattributedwithsupernaturalcurative
capabilities(Parker2013:Chapter22).
Thedecimationofindigenousrhinopopulations,aswellasthesouthwardexpansionofthe
empireincreaseddemandforrhinohornduringtheWesternHandynasty.AncientChinese
writingssuggestthatChineseemperorQinShihuang(whoreignedfrom221BCEto209BCE)
decreaseswhenhornisharvestedfromadeadcarcass–;andthetoppartofthehornwasthemostcovetedandexpensivepartofthehornwhenusedformedicinalpurposes.185Parker(2013:Chapter26:1–9)alsoidentifiestheconceptofthe“spiritrhinocerosunicorn”,conceivedbyLiShangyin,apoetduringtheTangdynasty.Thenotionthatthemythicrhinocerosunicornwasusingitshorntocommunicatewiththeskywasrepeatedinmanytextsuntilthe18thcentury.Fromaboutthattime,themythiccreaturesnolongerresembletherhinobutcontinuetogazeupatthemoon.186AhuntingexpeditionofKingSuanisdescribedinthefollowingwords:“Wehavebentourbows:wehaveourarrowsonthestring.Hereisasmallboartransfixed;thereisalargerhinoceroskilled(quotedby:Laufer1914:160).”187Intheirquesttoassemblecuriositiesfromdistantlands,Europeancollectorsoftenfellvictimtofakehornsellers.GermanEmperorRudolfII(1522–1612)wasbelievedtohavepaidhighpricesforhiscollectionofrhinohorntrinkets,whichwasfoundtoincludeseveralwaterbuffaloimitations(Chapman1999:15).
148
sentouthisarmytoopensouth-easttradestoacquirerhinohornandelephantivory(AnLiu
citedin:Chapman1999:26).Duetothetropicalclimateinthesouthernregions,demand
increasedforfever-reducingmedicinesthatcouldlowerlife-threateningtropicalfevers.While
theChineseundertheWesternHandynastywerecolonizingthesouth,seafarersand
merchantsfromtheArabpeninsulaandEuropelearnttousethesouthwestmonsoonwinds
tosailtosouthernIndia,resultinginincreasedcommunicationandtradebetweenAsiaand
EuropealongtheAsiansearoutes(Parker2013:Chapter19:2–3).TributestoChinese
emperorsoftenincludedrhinohorn,ivoryandtortoiseshellduringthoseearlydaysofSino-
Arabtrade(Hirth1885:70–71,79,154,222).
Theroutesdidnotonlyservethepurposeofexchangingspices,silk,ivoryandrhinohornbut
storiesandinformationwerealsopassedon,andhencethemythoftheunicornmoved
westwardalongthesilkroute,filteringthroughIndiancultureandrevivingtheancientIndian
storyofEkashringa(Parker2013:Chapter19:5).Inspiredrhinohorntradersfromsouthern
Asiaarebelievedtohavecomeupwiththemyththatrhinohornhadaphrodisiacqualitiesin
ordertomarkettheirproducttoWesternmarkets.Theaphrodisiacorvirilequalitiesarenot
mentionedinanyoftheancientChinesescriptures(Parker2013:Chapter19:6).
Theobjectiveofthissectionwastoshowthemillennia-longquasi-globalappreciationofthe
rhinoasamythicalcreaturewithtranscendentalandsupernaturalqualities.Interwovenwith
talesoftheunicornandothermythicalapparitions,rhinohornwasimbuedwithalexipharmic,
curativeandstatus-elevatingproperties.Itisnoteworthythatincertainculturesthehornwas
seenasaseparateentityfromtheanimal(EuropeandtheArabworld)whereasothers(such
astheChineseandIndians)acknowledgedtherhinoasapowerfulevensacredanimal.
Historically,theuseofrhinohorn(alicorn)appearstohavebeenaprivilegedaffair.Theruling
politicalandmilitaryeliteswereabletoaffordthehighpriceofrhinohornwhereasthepoor
reliedoncheapknock-offs.
3.4.Huntingtalesandmyths
Thevaluationofrhinohornasapreciousandsacralgoodhadnoimpactonthevaluationof
therhinoastheoriginalownerofthehornduringthecolonialperiod.Wildanimals
149
commandednoextraordinaryorintrinsicvalueatthetime.Thesacralisationofrhinohorn
duetoitsascribedhealthbenefits,aswellaslinkstoEuropeanroyalsandAsianemperors,led
togrowthinglobaldemand.Initially,thedemandcouldbemetwithhorngatheredfrom
naturalmortalitiesandthrough(mostly)sustainablehuntingexpeditions.Whatevermystical
linksweresustainedbetweenhumansandanimalsinmedievalEurope,withtheonsetofthe
AgeofReasonwildanimalswereseenasbeastsincapableofsentienceandthecapacityto
experiencepain(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:29).Asthemythologyoftheunicornandother
animalmythologieswanedintoobscurity,openhuntingseasonwasdeclaredonbiggame
animals,includingthevariousspeciesofrhino.AlthoughEasternbeliefsheldthathumans
“shoulddonoharmtobeastnorbug”(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:opcit),therhinoalso
escapedimmunityfromhuntinginAsiaandwashuntedtoextinctioninmostofitsoriginal
Asianrange.
AsidefromtheextinctionofallrhinospeciesinChinabythelateMiddleAges,therewerevast
numbersofrhinosleftelsewhereinAsia.Conquerorsandbanditsstartedtargetedhuntingof
Indianrhinosinthe16thcentury.ThegreatconquerorBabur,wholaidthefoundationofthe
MughaldynastyintheIndiansubcontinent,wasknownforhisbrutalrhinohunts(Kisling
2000:255).Ashumanpopulationsstartedincreasing,theIndianrhinowaspushedoutof
fertilefloodplainsandgrasslands.ThegovernmentofBengalissaidtohavepaidabountyof
20rupeesforeveryrhinokilleduntil1896.SportshuntinggreatlyreducedIndianrhinos
numbersduringthe19thcentury.Bythelate20th-centuryBritishcolonialforceshadbeen
introducedtomodernfirearmsandsportshuntingbecameadeadlypastimeofboredcolonial
troops.Shootingrhinosandotherwildanimalsbecameassociatedwithmasculinity,status
andprestige(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:29).IndigenousroyalssuchastheMaharajahof
CoochBehar(heshotdead207rhinosbetween1871and1907)matchedthecolonialpastime
withequalvigour(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:30).Atthelastcountin2012,about3500Asian
rhinos(Emslie/Milliken/Talukdar2013:12)survivedthedeadlyimpactofsportshunting,
poachingandhumanencroachment.AstheAsianspeciesarenotthefocusofthis
dissertation,sufficetomentionthattheirdecimation(amongstotherfactors)hadadeadly
dominoeffectontheAfricanrhino.
150
Afairamountofrhinoandelephanthuntinghappenedduringtheearlymodernperiodin
Africa.Indigenouspopulationswerenomadichunter-gatherersduringtheStoneAge.Their
frequentmigrationensuredthatnaturalresourceswereusedsustainably.TheSanrock
paintings(describedearlier)attesttotherespect,evenreverencenomadictribeshadfor
wildlifeandhunting(Carruthers1995:7).AstheIronAgeapproached,manyAfricantribes
settledandledanagriculturalorpastoralistlife-style.Conservationstrategiessimilartothose
inMedievalEuropewereemployedtodealwiththedemandsoftradeandcropprotection.
Wealthaccumulationledtosocialstratification,andhuntingbecameapoliticizedmatter
(Carruthers1995:7).HistorianJaneCarruthers(1995:7–8)arguesthattheimpactofpre-
colonialhuntingwassmallinrelationtotheabundantwildlife:
“Desirablewildlifespeciescametobecontrolledbytheelitewhoalonecouldinitiateahunt,controltradeinwildlifeproducts,andenjoythespoilofcertainspecies.Therewereevenroyalhuntingpreserves,outofboundstocommoners,thebestknownofwhichwasShaka’sreserveintheUmfolozidistrictofZululand,setasideinthe1820s.Strictprotectionproscriptionextendedtoclantotems,suchascrocodileorlion,whichcouldnotbedestroyed.”
Thisstateofaffairschangedwiththearrivalofcolonialsettlers,whointroducedfirearmsand
astrongmarketeconomy.Ultimatelytheincreasingcommodificationofwildlifeledtoits
overexploitation(Carruthers1995:8).ThefirstsuperintendentoftheSouthAfricanMuseum
ofNaturalHistorySirAndrewSmithcommentedontherelationshipbetweenrhinosand
humansin1838:
“Thepresentspecies,underthenameofRhinoster,hasbeenfamiliarlyknowntothecolonialistsoftheCapeofGoodHopeeversince1652.Inthatyear,whentheDutchfirstformedtheirsettlementontheshoresofTableBay,thisanimalwasaregularinhabitantofthethicketswhichclothedthelowerslopesofTableMountain.Theabandonmentbythisanimalasameasureofsafety,probablyconstitutedthecommencementofaforcedmigration,whichhascontinuedtoextendeversince,andwhichhaslednotonlytothedisappearanceofthespeciesfromthedistrictswithinthepresentcoloniallimits,butalsoinagreatmeasuretoitsremovalfromcountriesbeyondthoselimits,asfarashuntersefficientlyarmedareaccustomedtoresort.Ifasystem,suchashashithertoprevailed,continuestoexist,andthelargeranimalspersevereinflyingtoavoidtheeffectsoffirearm,thetimemayarrivewhenthevariousspecieswhichformerlymayhavebeenscattered,each,inapeculiarlocalityofalargecontinent,willbehuddledtogether;andindeedanadvancetowardsthatperiodisinprogress,asmaybeinferredfromtheconcentrationwhichispresenttakingplaceintheinteriorofSouthAfrica(Smith1838:56).”
151
AsEuropeancolonizersandexplorerswerepenetratingmoreremotepartsofAfrica,they
werecommentingontheabundantnumbersofrhinosacrossthecontinent
(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:35).Itisestimated(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:35;Kisling2000)
thattherewerebetween400000toonemillionblackrhinos(theyweremorenumerousthan
thewhitespecies)intheearly1800s.The‘ScrambleforAfrica’wasaccompaniedbythe
colonialarrivalsengagingin‘leisurely’past-timessuchassportsandtrophyhunting.
MacKenziearguesthatthecolonialfrontier“wasalsoahuntingfrontierandtheanimal
resourcecontributedtotheexpansionisturge.”Huntingbecamea“ritualizedandoccasionally
aspectaculardisplayofwhitedominance(Mackenzie1988:7).”
Itisdifficulttoestablishwherethehuntingfraternity’senthrallmentwiththecollectionof
huntingtrophiesoriginates.Thereappearstobeaconfluenceofseveralfactorssuchas
hunterswantingtoshowoffacollectionofwildlifespecimensbackhome,showmanshipand
keepingmementosofspecifichuntingexpeditions.Trophiesalsoservedmorepractical
purposessuchasinteriordecoration,collectingspecimensofspeciesforscientificpurposes
andasproofofbreedingsuccessinlateryears(Mackenzie1988:28–29;Damm2008:6).The
opportunityofbeingintricatelyinvolvedinthewritingofnaturalhistoryofferedhunters,
explorersandcolonialgovernorstheirchanceatfame.Manyhunterscollectedspeciesand
trophiesformuseumsandcollections;afewluckyoneshadspeciesnamedafterthem
(Mackenzie1988:38–39).
Interestinglyintheearlyyearsofthecolonialempire,therhinoinspiredyetanothermyth–a
huntingmyth.Likefiresidetales,huntersareknowntoembellishorromanticisetheirhunts.
Inthecaseoftherhino,colonialhunterswroteabouttheattacksofrhinosoncaravansand
huntingparties,imputingtherhinowithapugnaciousnature.SirAndrewSmith,thefirst
superintendentoftheSouthAfricanMuseumofNaturalHistory,relatedasupposedKenyan
taleofarhinocharge:
“Itsdispositionisextremelyfierceandituniversallyattacksmanifitseeshim.Theusualmethodofescapeadoptedbythenativesistoclimbupahighdensetress,soastoavoid,ifpossible,beingseen.Iftheanimalmisseshissightofthefugitive,heimmediatelygallopsofftohishaunt;fromwhenceitmaybeinferredthatheisnotempoweredwiththepowerofkeenscent.Shouldhe,however,espyhisobjectinthetree,woetotheunfortunatenative,–hebeginstobuttwithhishorns,–strikesandpenetratesthetree,andcontinuespiercingittillitfallswhenhisvictimseldom
152
escapesbeinggoredtodeath.Unlessthetreeisofalargegirth,heneverfailsinbreakingitdown.Havingkilledhisvictim,heleaveshimwithoutdevouringthecarcase[spellingoforiginalauthor].Themaleisonlyprovidedwiththehorn.Thefemalehasnotanythingofthekind(Smith1838:42).”
The“chargeoftherhino”becamenotoriousuntilbiggamehunterslaidthemythtorest.A
passionatehunter,formerUSPresidentTheodoreRooseveltdeclaredthatthesupposed
chargewaslittlemorethanthecuriouswildanimalmovingclosertothestrangehuman
apparitiononaccountofitspooreyesight(Hornaday[1922]1979:358).Theblackrhinois
knownforitsaggressivenature,butthereiscertainlynoevidencetosuggestthatrhinos
regularlyattackedcaravansorhuntingparties.HunterssuchasRoosevelt188andtheauthor
ErnestHemingwaywerenonethelessinaweoftherhino(Enright2008:72).Indescribinga
chatwithhissonKermitduringahuntingsafari,Roosevelt(1910:206–208)mayhave
unwittinglyprophesizedwhatlayaheadfortherhino:
“Lookathim,“saidKermit,“standingthereinthemiddleoftheAfricanplain,deepinprehistoricthought.”Indeedtherhinocerosdoesseemlikeasurvivalfromtheelderworldthathasvanished;hewasinplaceinthePliocene;hewouldnothavebeenoutofplaceintheMiocene;butnowadayshecanonlyexistatallinregionsthathavelaggedbehind,whiletherestoftheworld,forgoodorforevil,hasgoneforward.”
Roosevelt’sremarkpointstothefascinationofWesternhunterswiththerhino.Therhino
assumesasymbolicvalueofaneralonggonewherethepre-historiccreaturehadtheupper
handandwasnoteasilyovercome.Onapoliticallevel,Roosevelt’sassociationoftherhino
with“regionsthathavelaggedbehind”isperhapsironicandinadvertentlypointstothe
divergencebetweentheconservationanddevelopmentparadigms(whichareoftenat
loggerheadsandwillbediscussedinmoredetailinthenextchapter).
ThereweremanysimilaritiesbetweenthedemiseofAsianandAfricanspeciesofrhinoduring
the19thcentury.189AswasthecaseontheAsiansubcontinent,colonialhunters,settlersand
188In1909,RooseveltandhissonKermitembarkedonaone-yearexpeditiontocollectspecimensfortheSmithsonianInstitute.TheglorifiedhuntingsafaristartedinBritishEastAfrica(modernKenya)throughtoBelgianCongo(modernDRCCongoandRepublicofCongo)andendedinKhartoum(Sudan).Roosevelt‘collected’morethan1,100specimens(aftershootingandkillingthem)including20rhinotrophies(AnonymouswriterforEyeWitnesstoHistory1997).189DetailsaboutrhinohuntsundertakenbytheHamranArabsofSudanarenotexplored.Sufficetomentionherethattheyperfectedtheartofhuntingrhinosonhorseback,killingthemwithswords.HundredsofrhinohornswereshippedoutannuallyfromSomaliportsuntiltheendofthe19thcenturywhenrhinosbecamerareandeventuallyextinctinthosepartsofAfrica(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:36–41).
153
theirindigenouscollaboratorshaddecimatedrhinosacrossAfricabythe20thcentury.The
notoriousBritishcolonialbig-gamehunterandmilitaryofficialFrederickSeloussurmised:
“TherecanbenodoubtthattheblackrhinoceroshasbecomeveryscarceorevenceasedtoexistinmanypartsofBritishEastAfrica,whereonlytenyearsagoitwasveryplentiful,andthereturnsofthoseshotonsportsmen'sorsettlers'licensesdonotaltogetheraccountfortheirdisappearance(quotedinCasada1998:179).”
LikeincolonialIndia,theimprovedfirepowerandaccuracyofhuntingriflesallowedeven
amateurstoengageinsports-huntingandbig-gamehunting.Thehornsweresoldtoboth
EuropeanandAsianmarketswhilebothAfricansandEuropeansatethemeat
(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:35).Table4(below)providesabird’seyeviewofexportsof
severalwildlifeproductsfromtheporttownofDurbanincolonialNatalduringthe19th
century,includinghighvolumesofrhinohorn.
Table4:WildlifeexportsfromtheportofDurban,1844-1904
Source:extractedfrom:McCracken(2008:27–28)
154
DurbanwasoneoftheseveralAfricanharbours190thatactedasnodalpointsconnecting
wildlifesupplierstonorthernmarkets.ThemajormarketsforrhinohornwereIndia(which
alsoservedasatransshipmentpointforChinaandSoutheastAsia)andEurope,specifically
GermanyandGreatBritain(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:91).ThemassacreofAfricanrhinos
duringcolonialtimeswassodirethattheybecameextinctinmanyoftheirtraditionalrange
states.InEastAfrica,blackrhinoswereconsideredverminundergamecontrolacts,andopen
huntingseasonwasdeclaredinpursuitoflandclearance(Msimang2012:19).Therewere
limitedconservationmeasuresinplace,thevaluationofwildlifeasanaturalheritage
worthwhileprotectingwasinitsinfancyandnocommonsenseprevailedwhenitcameto
limitinghunting(Chapter4explainshowexcessivehuntingeventuallyledtoearly
conservationinitiatives).
Theaimofthissub-sectionwastoshowthathuntingmetmuchoftheglobaldemandfor
rhinohorninthecolonialperiod.Rhinohuntingconstitutedhowevernotonlyamethodof
attainingrhinohorn,huntersalsostartedtovaluetheactofrhinohunting,trophiesandhorn
collectables.Rhinohuntsandtheresultanttrophieswereeconomicallylucrativeanddenoted
symbolicvalue,suchasmasculinity,191triumphovernatureandcolonialempirebuilding.
Rhinotrophyorsportshuntingrepresentedthehigh-endspectrumoftheconsumermarketat
thetime.
3.5TheculturallegacyofthejambiyaanditssymbolicvalueinYemen
The1970soilboomintheMiddleEastledtoanenormousincreaseinpercapitaincomein
NorthYemen,affordingupwardsocialmobilityanddisposableincometoanewgenerationof
Yemenicitizens.Leadinguptotheboomyears,onlyafewYemenimenofhighsocialstatus
couldaffordtheelaboratively-carvedjambiya,atraditionalceremonialdaggerofwhichthe
190Zanzibar,Mombasa,Mafia,Bagamoyo,PembaandDaresSalaamweremajorIndianOceanharboursservicingbothEuropeanandAsianmarketsthroughoutthecolonialperiod.WhileundertakingresearchintheZanzibararchives,EsmondMartinfoundthatZanzibarimerchantsimportedseveraltonsofrhinohornfromtheTanzanianmainlandannuallyduringthe1800s(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:91).191Whilethehuntressplaysanimportantroleinancientmyths,theriseofthefemaletrophyhunterisarecentphenomenon.
155
hiltiscarvedoutofrhinohorn(seeFigure6).Withitsoriginsdatingbackseveralthousand
years,thejambiyaplaysacrucialroleinYemeniculture.WhiletherearenorhinosinNorth
Yemen,rhinohornhasbeenusedintheMiddleEasterncountryformorethanonethousand
years(Varisco1989a:215).Historically,particulartypesofjambiyasandthewayitwasworn
signalledaman’sstatusinsociety.Thosewhocouldnotclaimtribaloriginsorwereoflow
socialstatuswerenotallowedtowearjambiyas(Martin/Vigne/Allan1997:2).Afterthe
revolutionin1962,jambiyasbecamelessintertwinedwithdeclaringone’sstatus.However,
theyremainedasymbolofYemeniidentity,anexpressionofself-identificationwiththe
dominanttribalcultureandthenewemergingnationalism(Varisco1989a:216).Mostadult
menwerewearingjambiyasforsymbolicratherthanfunctionalpurposesduringtheoilboom.
Thedaggersignifiesthatamaniscapableofdefendinghimselfandhistribe(whichhappens
seldom),andplaysacentralroleofthebar’adanceperformedatimportanttribaland
nationalevents.Itisalsoasymbolofhonourandaman’sword,whichissurrenderedduring
mediationoftribaldisputesasabondtosignalacceptanceofthemediator’sdecision(Varisco
1989a:216).
TheYemeniportofAdenwasasignificantportofcallforArabtradersinvolvedinthetradeof
ivoryandrhinohornfromAfricatoChinaandIndia.Rhinohornmayhaveenteredlocal
YemenimarketsevenbeforetheIslamicperiod(Varisco1989a:opcit).Whatisfascinating
abouttheuseofrhinohorninNorthYemenistheobservationthatitshighvaluationis
directlylinkedtotheculturalsignificanceofthejambiyaandnottotheanimalitderivesfrom
(Varisco1989a:215).WhiletherhinohasnosignificancetoYemenis,rhinohornwashighly
valuedforitsfunctionalvalueasasuperiorhilt.Hiltsmadeofrhinohornaremoreresistantto
wearandtearthanthosemadefromothermaterials,suchascoworbuffalohorn(Varisco
1989b:46).Varisco(1989a:216)explainsthepreferenceforrhinohornoverothermaterials
asfollows:
“Rhinohornisthepreferredmaterialbecauseitissaidtoimprovewithageandhandling.Thereisalsoanaestheticinterest.Afterafewdecadesarhinohornhiltbecomestranslucent,atransformationthattakesnotplacewiththeothermaterialsavailabletodaggermakers.AsitagesthehiltmayalsotakeonayellowishhueresemblingthehighlypizedamberusedinYemenijewellery.Inamaturehilt,after60–100years,individualhairlinesmaybediscernedmoredistinctly.”
156
Unlikejambiyasmadeofothermaterials,thevalueofrhinohorndaggersincreaseswithage.
Jambiyasthatbelongedtokings,tribaleldersandpoliticalleadersarethemosthighlyvalued
andfamousdaggers.Moreover,whileYemenimencouldaffordtowearjambiyasaftertheoil
boom,thebestdaggerswereornateandoverlaidwithgoldandsilver,signallingaman’shigh
socialstatusandwealth(Varisco1989b:46).
Figure6:Atraditionaljambiyawithhiltcarvedoutofrhinohorn
Source:OrientalArms192
Marketexchangesinvolvingrhinohornwerelegaluntilthelate1970s.Martin(1982:92–93)
foundthatrhinohornsoldfor32US$perkgatauctionsinEastAfricain1969.By1978,the
worldmarketpriceforrhinohornhadincreasedtoUS$300perkg.Therhinohorntrade
expertarguesconvincinglythatthepriceinflationwasnotonlylinkedtotheincreased
demandinYemenbutalsotochangesinthestructureandcompositionoftheworldmarket
(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:93).Atthesource(predominantlyinKenyaatthetime),Africans
enteredthetrophiesmarketandbrokethemonopolyoftheGujaratidealers,thereby
introducingcompetition.Moreover,nationalauthoritiesinseveralAfricanrangestatessold
theirstockpilesofivoryandrhinohornatauctions.Protectionistpolicieswereimplemented,
192Thephotodepictsalate19th-centuryjambiyafromOman.Thegripiscarvedoutofrhinohorn,mountedwithfiligreegoldandsilvermountsandadornedwithsilvernailsonthefrontandpommelside.Imageavailableathttp://oriental-arms.com/item.php?id=5248(accessed20August2015).
157
whichdisadvantagedIndiantradersanddisplacedthemonopolisticmarketstructures.Asthe
pricesbegantoincreaseatthesourceinEastAfrica,buyersfromSingapore,Macau,Hong
Kong,Japan,Taiwan,SouthKoreaandlaterNorthYemenhadtoraisetheiroffing,too
(Martin/Martin/Amin1982:93).
Accordingtoofficialstatistics,NorthYemenimportedanaverageof2878kgofrhinohorn
eachyearbetween1969and1977,amountingtoanaverageproductionofapproximately8
750rhinohorndaggersperannum(Martin/Vigne/Allan1997:9).Thewholesalepriceofrhino
hornsurgedduringthe1970sand1980sinYemen,reaching$680perkgin1987.TheYemeni
currencywasdecliningatthetime,renderingjambiyamoreexpensiveinrealterms.Rhino
hornimportsstartedtodropduetothedualeffectsofdecreasingrhinonumbersinAfricaand
theexpansionofEastAsianinterestsinthehorntrade.EastAsianswereabletoofferdouble
thepriceduetothestrengthofAsiancurrenciesatthetime(Martin/Vigne/Allan1997:17).As
aresult,anewrhinohorndaggercostatleast$1500whereasseveralhigh-endspecimens
werevaluedatseveralhundredsofthousandsofDollarsinthe1980s(Varisco1989a:opcit).
Manydaggerswerelockedawayandsafeguardedduetotheirgrowinginvestmentvalue.The
priceofjambiyascontinuedtosurgeafterthegovernmentbannedtheimport,exportanduse
ofrhinohornin1987.Uptothispoint,jambiyaartisanscollectedandsoldrhinohornshavings
totheChinesemarket(Varisco1989b).AftertheMarxistgovernmenthadbeenoustedin
SouthYemenin1990,NorthandSouthYemenbecameonecountry.TheMarxistgovernment
intheSouthhadpreviouslybanneditscitizensfromcarryingweapons,includingthejambiya.
Whiletheunificationofthetwonationsdidnotleadtoanincreaseinthedemandforrhino
horndaggersinthesouthernregions,thecultureofwearingjambiyasinthenorthernpartsof
Yemenremains(Vigne/Martin2008:45).Rhinohornisstillsmuggledintothecountrybutat
much-reducedlevels(Interviews,2013and2014)asYemenibuyersareunabletocompete
withthehighpricesofferedonAsianmarkets.Varisco(1989a:217)warnedinthelate1980s
thatwhilethedemandmightbewaning,arhinohorndaggerpresentedaninvestment
opportunityinaneconomywithhighinflationandfewsafeinvestments.Jambiyashave
becomegenerationalheirlooms,passedonfromfathertoson.Thesonofasheikh,for
example,inheritedajambiyawhichwasvaluedatmorethantwomillionDollarsin2009.193
193DanielMartinVariscoreferredmetothispressclipping,whichwastranslatedfromArabintoEnglish.Availableat:http://marebpress.net/mobile/articles.php?id=5305&lng=arabic(accessed12July2015)
158
Irrespectiveofwhetherrhinohornisprocessedintodaggersornot,theinvestmentvalueof
rhinohornisaseriousmatterinlightofdwindlingrhinonumbersandwillbefurther
discussedinthenextandfinalsectionofthischapter.
3.7Currentrhinohornuse,consumerprofilesandproductdifferentiation
Alengthyprocessofsacralisationhasledtothevaluationofrhinohornasa“sacredobject
withpowerfuldetoxifyingqualities”(Focusgroupwithconsumers,2013).Thevaluationof
rhinohornisthuscloselyintertwinedwithculturalbeliefsthatconferarangeoffunctional
andsymbolicpropertiesuponthecovetedanimalpart.Itstranscendentalvaluehasbeen
transferredandreiteratedviaaglobalhistoryofbelief.Whileaminorityofcurrentconsumers
imputerhinohornwithsupernaturalormythicalproperties,keyconsumergroupshave
acceptedandassimilatedthesacredvalueofrhinohorn.Whilethescarcityofrhinoshas
contributedtothehighpriceofrhinohorn,itshistoricalusewasassociatedwithpolitical,
economicandmilitaryelites,aswellasroyalsacrosstheglobewhocouldaffordtopaythe
highprice.Intimesoflimitedsupply(seeearlysections),thepriceofrhinohornwouldsurge
tonewheights,neverrecoveringtoitsmoreaffordablepreviousprice.Similartothemarket
forivory(seeforexample:Gao/Clark2014;Lemieux/Clarke2009;Harvey2015),rhinohornis
adifferentiatedproductwithaheterogeneousconsumerprofile.Thefollowingsection
providesanoverviewoffindingsgatheredduringfieldworkinsouthernAfricaand
southeasternAsia,aswellasinsightssynthesizedfromscholarlyandpolicyliteratures.A
functionaltypologyispresentedwiththeprovisothatsomeconsumersmayuserhinohorn
forseveralpurposesatthesametime,orhornusemaychangeovertime,forexample:rhino
hornmaybegiftedtoapersonwhothenusesgrounduprhinohornforhealthreasons.
3.7.1RhinohornasaninvestmentandmoneylaunderingtoolBothlegalandcriminalactorsareusingrhinohornasaninvestmenttool.Theearliersection
ontheuseofrhinohorninYemenijambiyasreferredtotheinvestmentvalueofrhinohorn
daggers.Investmentventuresintorhinohorndaggersorobjetsd’artmadefromrhinohorn
159
(suchaslibationcups)presentoneendoftheinvestmentscaleofrhinohorn.Rhinohorn
daggersareoftenfamilyheirlooms,passedonfromfathertoson.Thisprocessedformof
rhinohornonlyre-enterscirculationoncethedaggeriseitherstolenorlegallysold.Similarto
Arabinvestorsbuyingjambiyasasgrowingassets,Asianbusinessentrepreneursarelikewise
pickingupobjetsd’artsuchastheoften-ornatelycarvedlibationcups(seeFigure5),vasesor
otherartisticcreations.KarlAmmanandhisteam(2015b)identifiedfactoriesinHanoithat
wereproducingreligiousartefactsandsymbolssuchasprayerbangles,braceletsandBuddha
beads.SalesofthesereligiousobjectsweretargetedatvisitingChinesetourists.
Whilesomebuyersarelegitimateartcollectorsandlovers,othersaredrivenbylesscultural
andmoreeconomicprinciples.Themathematicsissimple:Astheliverhinonumbersgrow
fewer,theinvestmentvalueofrhinohornandhornproductsgrowsmarkedly.Sincethe2008
globalfinancialmeltdown,stockmarketorconventionalfinancialinvestmentshavebecomea
lessdesirableinvestmentoption.Rhinohornisdeemedasafeinvestmentoptionintimesof
financialuncertainty:Whereassharepricesmaydrop,thevalueofrhinohornisbelievedto
beincreasingandfoolprooffromfinancialmarketcrashes.AccordingtoanAsianwildlife
traffickingintermediary(Interview,2013):“It’slikepayingwithacreditcard.”Saysasmuggler
(Interviewwithintermediary2,2013):
“TheauctionsareonlyinAsiaandattheseauctions,someofthembuythehornsandtakethemintothehouseandputthemonamantelpieceandthentheymakeitveryverysecureandthenleaveitthere.Andthenheknowsthat'sthemoneythatIhavegothere.”
Someofthesetransactionsoccurinthelegalrealmatworld-renownedauctionhouseswith
thecorrectpaperworkandrequiredCITESpermits.However,othertransactionsinvolve
fraudulentactivitiessuchastheprocessingoffreshlyharvestedrhinohorninto“pre-
Convention”libationcupsusinginnovativeagingtechniques(thesectiononfakerhinohorn
providesmoredetail).Apoliceinvestigatorexplains(Interview,2013):
“IfyoulookattheeconomicsofVietnam,theywereverypoor.SowhentheVietnamesecametoSouthAfrica,andyoucanseehowitstartedescalatingin2002,2003,theywerebuyinguprhinohorncheaply.SosimilartowhatwashappeningintheUSAandAustraliaandwithinEurope,rhinohornstartedtosellonauctionsaspre-
160
conventionrhinohorn,aslibationcupsortheychangeitintolibationcups.WiththatyoualsohaveseentheBig5huntersintheUSA,theystartedtosellofftheirtrophies.Andwho'sthebuyersofthetrophies?InOperationCrash,thattheydidthislastyear,youstartedseeingthembuyingupthetrophiesandtheywenttoVietnam.Butonlythehorn.InSouthAfrica,asimilarprocessstartedhappening.Thepeoplethathadstartedtradinginrhinohornapproachedthesemarketsandsaid:‘Iwanttomakemoremoney.’SoalltheseguysthathadaccesstotheVietnamesestartedtobuyalltheserhinohornsfromtheprivatestockpiles.”194
Thepoliceinvestigatoralsotouchesonthediversionoflegalrhinohuntingtrophiesintothe
illegalmarket.Essentially,thelegitimateownerschanneltheirlegallyacquiredandcertified
rhinohorns–thehornsminustherestofthetrophy–intoillegalmarketflows.Thisformof
launderinginvolvesaconversionfromasymbolicvaluationofrhinohorntoaneconomic
valuation,drivenbyprofit-seekingbehaviour.Whereastherhinotrophymayhavebeen
valuedasamementoofahuntingsafariinthepast(seeearliersectiononhuntingtales),
rhinohornsaretransformedintoinvestmenttools,ofwhichthere-sellvalueislikelyto
exceedthecostoftheoriginaltrophyhunt.
Inotherinstances,rhinohornremainsundifferentiated(unprocessed)inbankvaults,strong
roomsorsafelocationsatthesourceinrhinorangestatesorthehornistransferredtosimilar
‘safe’locationselsewhere(predominantlyinAsia).Whilecurrentstreamsofliteraturereferto
the“Asianmarket”asthemainconsumergroupofrhinohorn,rhinohorninvestorscome
fromdifferentculturalandnationalbackgrounds.SouthAfricanlawenforcersbelievethat
roguewildlifeprofessionals(rhinohorn“producers”)presentaportionofthisconsumer
group(Interviews,2013).Upon“harvesting”rhinohorn(dehorning)rhinos,wildlife
professionals(includingprivaterhinoowners)andtheirlocalbuyersstoretheunprocessed
horninasafelocation.195Whileprivaterhinoownersareallowedtoretainrhinohornwhenin
possessionoftherequiredpaperwork–theso-calledThreatenedorProtectedSpecies(TOPS)
194TheU.S.FishandWildlifeServiceisleadinganon-goinginvestigationentitled“OperationCrash”,whichtacklesillegaltraffickingofrhinohornintheUnitedStates.Severalantiquedealersandillegalhornbuyershavebeenarrested(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2014).TheSouthAfricaninvestigatorreferstohuntingtrophiesgettingexportedtoVietnam;however,manyhornsalsowenttoChina.195Becauserhinohornisanaturalmaterial,weevils,mitesanddecompositionmayaffectstockpiles.Zimbabwe’s5-tonnestockpileofrhinohornhasreportedlybeenaffectedbyweevildamage(EyewitnessNews2014).Arsenic,dieselandotherchemicalsareusedtopreserverhinohorn(Interviewswithparkauthoritiesandprivaterhinoowners,2013).
161
regulations,whicharediscussedlater–theyarenotallowedtosellortradeinrhinohornand
theyarerequiredtoregistertheirstockpiles.196Aswillbeshowninlaterchaptersofthis
dissertation,wildlifeactorshavedevisedinnovativestrategiestobypassregulationsand
prohibitions.Awildlifeveterinarianconfirmedthepractice(Interview,2013):“Ifyouhave
rhinohorn,youputitsomewheresafe,it’sagrowingasset.”Theseprivate-owned
unregisteredrhinohornsareeitherkeptinasafelocation(whichcomeswithahighrisk)197or
launderedintoillegalmarketflowsatintervals.Noteworthyofthistypeofuseisthatitisnon-
consumptive;inotherwords,rhinohorncanberepurposedforotherusesfurtherdownthe
lineandre-enterflows(circulation).
Criminalnetworksareusingrhinohornandotherwildlifecontrabandasaformofcriminal
currencyoraninstrumenttolaunderill-gottenfortunes.Thedwindlingliverhinonumbers
andthepossibleextinctionofthespeciesformpartoftheeconomicvaluationofrhinohorn
forsuchcriminalnetworkswhomthemselvesareactivelycontributingtothedemiseofthe
rhino.Suchactorsarespeculatingonthepossibleextinctionofrhinos.198AnAsian
intermediaryexplainstheinvestmenthorizonasfollows:
“Whenyoubuyrhinohorn,youputitinthesafe.Aftertenyears,youtakeoutthesamehorn,yougoingtohaveabiginvestment.Itisdifferentfrommoney.IfyoubuyR500000ofrhinohorn,thenaftertenyearsitisworthR1million.Youputthesamemoneyintothebankandmaybeit’sgoingtobeworthR600000aftertenyears.”
Rhinohornisalsousedasacurrencyincriminalbusinesstransactions:illegalhunters,for
example,userhinohorntobuyhuntingriflesandweapons.
196Nationalgovernmentsofrhinorangestates,aswellaszooandsafariparksacrosstheworld,arealsostockpilingrhinohornalbeitlegally.Theseactorshavemultiplereasonsformaintainingnationalstockpiles,rangingfrommaintainingageneticdatabasetokeepingtheiroptionsopenforthepossibilityofaregulatedlegaltradeinrhinohorninthefuture.197TheftsandarmedrobberieshaveoccurredatseveralprivateandpublicstockpilesinSouthAfrica.Inoneincident,66rhinohornswerestolenafewdaysbeforenatureconservationofficialswereduetoregisterthehorns.198TwoindependentinformantsinSouthAfricaclaimedthatAsiannationalshadapproachedthemtofindoutwhethertheywouldbeinapositiontolocateandkillallremainingrhinosinSouthAfrica.Whilethesupposedhitappearsfar-fetched,interviewswithcriminalactorsreiteratedtheinvestmentvalueofrhinohorn.
162
3.7.2Rhinohornasastatussymbol
Theearliersectiononjambiyasmadereferencetothelargelysymbolicuseofrhinohorn
daggerstodenotesocialstrataandwealthinYemenisociety.MillikenandShaw(2012)notea
similarpatterninVietnamandChina,whereeconomicaffluenceandupwardsocialmobility
haveledtoanincreaseddemandforrhinohornproductsoverthepastdecade.Rhinohornis
usedinthetreatmentofcancer(discussedbelow),asageneralhealthtonic,asahangover
cureandstatussymbol.Thelatterthreeusesarefrequentlyintertwinedaswealthy
individualsshowofftheirstatusandwealthbyconsumingrhinohornasahealthtonicand
hangovercure.Consumptionofrhinohorninthisinstanceislinkedto‘faceconsumption’.199
ThistypeofconsumptionholdssignificantculturalvaluetocertainstrataofAsiansociety,
whichengageinactsofconspicuousconsumptioninorder“toenhance,maintainorsave
face”(Milliken/Shaw2012:135).Accordingtoastudyontheconsumptionofwildanimal
productsinVietnam(Drury2011:247),thepopularityofsuchproductsislinkedtotheir
functionasamedium“tocommunicateprestigeandobtainsocialleverage.”Drury(2011:
254)alludestothechallengecommunitymembersofcollectivesocietiesmayfaceinnot
conformingtosocialnorms.ThefearoflosingfaceholdsswayinAsiansocieties,where
personalpreferencesmayfallsecondtothoseofthegroup.Thisobservationisimportant
withregardstothenotionofcontestedillegality,theearliermentionedstrategyemployedto
legitimizeillegaleconomicactivities.Enforcingnewrulesorregulationsthatcontradictwell-
establishedsocialnormsandpracticesarelikelytoachievelimitedsuccess(thisisdiscussedin
moredetailintheconcludingsectionofthischapter).
ConsumersinterviewedduringfieldworkinVietnamandHongKongconfirmedthese
observationsandthestatus-elevatingpropertiesofrhinohorn.Severalinformants
(Interviews,2013)relatedhowrhinohornfeaturedatexclusiveprivatepartiesandin
executiveclubs.Therhinohornowner(existingresearchsuggeststhatwealthyoldmenare
themainconsumers,womenfeaturehoweverinthepartycontext,too)suppliesshotsof
“rhinowine”,“rhinoalcohol”or“drinkofthemillionaires”–acocktailofgrounduprhinohorn
199The“lossofface”referstogettingembarrassedinfrontofone’sfriendsandpeers.AccordingtoaresearchinformantinHongKong(Interview1,2013):“Ifyoulosefaceonce,itisdifficulttogetitbackunlesssomeonegrantsyouface-achancetoregainyourhonour.”InkeepingupwiththeJoneses,peoplehaveto“fightforface”.
163
andricewineordistilledspirits(seeFigure7).Whileseveralnewspaperarticlessuggestthat
hedonisticconsumerssnortrhinohornuptheirnoses(muchlikecocaine),datacollectionat
thesourceandinterviewswithlawenforcementagentsfailedtoverifytheseclaims.However,
rhinohornisusedinconjunctionwithalcoholandotherillicitdrugs.
Figure7:Rhinoalcohol
Source:PhototakenbyresearcherinHanoi,Vietnam
ThemixingofrhinohornwithalcoholgoesagainstthebasicinstructionsofTCMdoctorswho
warnpatientsnevertomixrhinohornwithalcoholorsalinesolutionsasitunderminesthe
efficacyofthemedicine(InterviewswithTCMdoctors,HanoiandHoChiMinhCity,2013).
Despitethewarning,theunorthodoxapplicationofrhinohornasadetoxificationtonicand
after-partycleanserappearstobethemostpopularuseofrhinohorninVietnam(Interview
withTRAFFICofficer,Hanoi,2015).ThisechoespartiallywithfindingsoftheTRAFFICstudy
(Milliken/Shaw2012),whichidentifiedhabitualmiddle-ageduserswhofrequentlydrink‘rhino
wine’tocountertheeffectsofexcessivedrinking.IntheaftermathoftheinitialTRAFFIC
study,WWFengagedtheservicesofaVietnam-basedmarketingcompanytoassessconsumer
164
preferencesinrhinohornconsumptioninthetwomajorcitiesofHanoiandHoChiMinhCity
inVietnam.Basedonasampleof600people,thestudyfoundthathighly-educatedwealthy
peoplewerethemainbuyersandusersofrhinohornforhealthandstatusreasons.Thestudy
alsoidentified‘intenders’,whocurrentlylackedthefinancialmeanstoaffordrhinohornbut
whowereintendingtobuyitoncetheyhaddisposableincome(IpsosMarketing2013).A
subsequentstudyfound(PSI/Vietnam2015:7):
“Perceivedhealthbenefits,includingbodydetoxificationand/orhangovermanagement,werethemostcommonreasonforrecentrhinohornuse.High-incomeurbanmenaremorelikelytouserhinohorniftheybelieveitcanachieveshort-termhealthimprovements,increasesocioeconomicstatus,orstrengthenprofessionalrelationships.”
Aninterestingsidebaristheuseofrhinohornasagift,whichmaybeofferedtopoliticaland
economicelites,orbusinessassociates.DuetoitssacredvaluewithinAsiancommunities,a
giftofrhinohornreflectsthatthegift-giverholdstherecipientinhighesteem.Thegiftthus
fulfilsthefunctionof‘showingface’,andisinterpretedasatokenofrespectandadmiration.
Whilenodirectreciprocityisexpected,agiftofhorn“mayopenmanydoors.”Aseconomic
andpoliticalelitestendtofallintotheagecategoryofmiddle-agedtoold,thegiftingofrhino
hornsignalsthegiver’swishfortherecipienttoenjoyalong,healthyandprosperouslife
(Interviews,2013).RhinohornalsoservesasacatalysttofacilitatedealsbetweenAfricanand
Asianbusinesspeople.Therarebodypartisusedtoleveragediscountsormaintain
preferentialbusinessrelationships.Itsfunctionisqualitativelydifferentfromprovidingan
altruisticgiftinthatitplaysafacilitativeroleineconomicexchangesbasedonanexpectation
ofreciprocity.Saysanintermediary(Interview,2013):
“TheChinesearebusiness-mindedpeople,sotoattractyoutheyalwayscomewithgifts.So,me,whenIusedtogothere,theyusedtotellmetheyaregoingtogivemeahugediscount,butImustgivethemrhinohorn.Imustbringthemzebraskins,alsotigerskins.‘Ifyouhaveit,tellmeandIwilltellmyagentinAfricatobringitthisside’.Sotheyareusingitasagift.Intheircountry,itissomethingthattheyvalue.Eachandeveryonehashisownpurposeintakingtherhinohornbecausetheygivingitasecondvalue.”
Thissectionfocusedontheuseofrhinohornasastatussymbol.Whilethestatus-elevating
165
qualitiesconstitutethe‘primary’use,secondaryusesmayentailhealth,entertainment,
detoxification/hangovercureandgifting.Afinalobservationrelatestoanotherconsumer
groupinadifferentculturalandgeographicalcontext:Whenarhinotrophyismountedona
wallordisplayedinshowroomsathuntingconventions,itarguablyalsoservesthepurposeof
astatussymbol.Ahuntingtrophysignalsthattheownerisanaccomplishedtrophyhunter
whohasmanagedtobagoneofAfrica’sBigFive.
3.7.3Rhinohornasmedicine
TheuseofrhinohorninTraditionalChineseMedicinehasbeendescribedatlengthinthe
earliersectionsofthischapter.Theimputedalexipharmicandantipyreticpropertiesofrhino
hornbywayofaglobalhistoryofculturalbeliefhavecontributedtoitssacredvalueinAsian
communities.Theuseofrhinohornasmedicineisfrequentlylinkedtoothertypesofuse.For
example,producersofrhinoartefactssellshavingsofrhinohorntotheTCMmarket.Theissue
offakerhinohornisparticularlywidespreadinthissegmentoftherhinohornvaluechainas
processed(groundup)powderisusuallysoldtoTCMconsumers,whohavelittlerecourseto
qualitycontrolwhenpresentedwithanunidentifiablepowderedsubstance(discussedin
detailinChapter8onfakehorn).
WhereasTCMdoctorsusedtoprescriberhinohornforthepurposesofloweringfeverand
inflammation(itisa“bodycooler”),detoxificationandstabilizationofthecentralnervous
system(ĐỗTấtLợi1962),thehealingrepertoirehasbeenextendedtoincludetreatmentof
cancer,strokeandimpotence.Theapplicationofrhinohorntotreatthishostof‘new’
diseasesstandsatloggerheadswithmedicalmasterworkssuchasProfessorĐỗTấtLợi’s‘The
medicinalplantsandherbsofVietnam’ortheLiShizhen’sCompendiumofMateriaMedica.In
awrittenstatementtotheCITESStandingCommittee,thepresidentoftheAmericanCollege
ofTraditionalChineseMedicine(ACTCM)andPresidentoftheCouncilofCollegesof
AcupunctureandOrientalMedicine(CCAOM),LixinHuang(2011:2)declared:
“AccordingtoTCMtheories,rhinohornswereusedtotreattyphoidfever,convulsions,macula,carbuncleandotherdisorders,whichwasthetraditionaluseoverthousands
166
ofyears.However,someindividualsandorganizationswithlittleunderstandingoftheessenceandmoderndevelopmentofTCMmisinterpretandexaggeratethemedicinalpropertiesofrhinohorns.SuchmisinterpretationshowslittlerespectfortheTCMprofessionandmedicalpractices,andisharmfultorhinoconservationefforts…[…]…Whilethisincrease[ofrhinopoaching]maybeinpartattributabletotraditionalmedicine,theoverwhelmingdemandderivesfromanon-traditionalandunprovenuse–asacureforcancer.ThereisnoevidencethatrhinohornisaneffectivecureforcancerandthisisnotdocumentedinTCMnorisitapprovedbytheclinicalresearchintraditionalChinesemedicine.”
Curiously,theuseofrhinohornasanaphrodisiacwasaWesternmythuntilfairlyrecent,and
therehadbeennoempiricalormedicalbasisintheancientscripturesforsuchclaims.Since
thelate2000s,theclaimthatrhinohorn“rendersmenvirile”hashoweverbeenusedasa
marketingtoolaimedatthehigh-endsegmentoftheconsumermarket(Interviewwith
enforcementofficial,2013).Theaphrodisiacuseiscloselylinkedtomiddle-agedandolder
men’sappreciationofrhinohornasastatussymbol.AconsumerinHanoi(Interview,2013)
explainedthattheascribedaphrodisiacqualitiesderivedfromtheanimal’slengthyperiodof
copulationandthephallicfeaturesofrhinohorn.
Severalrhinohornconsumerswereinterviewedwhowereusingrhinohornforthetreatment
ofvariousformsofcancer.Thesecancerpatientsconsumedrhinohornpreparations(mixed
withotherTCMingredients)inconjunctionwithevidence-basedcancertreatments.The
daughterofaStage3cancerpatient,forexample,boughtrhinohornregularly(fromawildlife
crimespoliceinvestigator)tocounteractthedebilitatingeffectsofchemotherapyherdadwas
experiencing(Interviewwithconsumer5,2013).Researchreports(suchasthemuch–cited
TRAFFICreport:Milliken/Shaw2012)refertothe‘cancercuremyth’,whichisseenasthe
catalystforthesurgeinthedemandforrhinohorninVietnam.Itisdifficulttoassesswhether
ahigh-levelpolitician’srecoveryfromcancerafterusingrhinohornisasufficientexplanation
fortheincreaseddemandforrhinohorninVietnamduringthe2000s.Structuralexplanations
suchasthemassivegrowthofwealthyentrepreneurswithdisposableincome,thesacral
valuation,thehighpriceandlinkedinvestmentvalueofrhinohornseemtobethemain
driversofdemandinAsia.However,dissectingthe‘cancercuremyth’shedsalightregarding
theimplicitdisconnectbetweenlegalrules,socialnormsandculturalpracticeswhenitcomes
totheconsumptionofendangeredwildlifeproducts.
167
SeveralTCMdoctorsandcancerpatients(Interviews,2013)madereferencetothemiraculous
recoveryfromprostatecancerofaformerVietnamesepresidentafterconsumingrhinohorn.
Whentheformerpresidentfellill,hesoughtmedicalattentioninSingaporein2004(Winnick
2007;Aggler2008).200Hereportedlyusedrhinohorninconjunctionwithmoderncancer
treatments(Interviewwithanoncologist,2013).Itremainsunclearwhetherstate-of-the-art
cancertreatmentsorrhinohornledtoremissionatthetime.201Withoutthepresident’s
confirmationordenial,itisalsouncertainwhetherheindeedusedrhinohorn.Irrespectiveof
thepresident’scircumstances,manycancerpatientsuseacombinationofmodernand
traditionalmethods.Accordingtoonedoctor(Interview,Hanoi,2013):
“Forthosewithcancer,orevenforthepatientwithveryadvancedstageofthecancer,besideswesternmethod,theywanttogetsometraditionalmedicinetotreatthemselvesandinfactthisoneisverycommoninVietnam.Inmyexperiencestherearemany,manycancerpatientsthatisonwesternmedicinesandtheyuseherbalmedicine,theyusetraditionalmedicinetotreatthemselves.Weunderstand,weknowthis.ButatthemomenttherearenoevidencetoconfirmthattraditionalorsomethinglikethisinVietnamcancurethecancerandcancurethepatients.Forexample,afterchemotherapyorafterradiationtherapy,theygotothetraditionalmedicinehospitalandtheygetmedicationoverthere,traditionalmedicineoverthere.Inprinciple,youknow,traditionalmedicineisok,becauseaccordingtoourtraditionalmedicineandsomemedicationlikethiscanhelp.Forexample,improvingtheimmunesystemormakethepatienteatbetterorfuelappetite,butactuallyatthemomentwedonothaveanystudytoanalysethebenefitoftraditionalmedicinetothecancerpatientwhohavegotwesternmedicine.Atthemoment,wedon’thaveanyevaluationaboutthis.Butverycommonaftertreatmentherethepatientgotothetraditionalmedicinehospitalforfurthertreatment,forsupplementarytreatmentoverthere.Iknowthis.”
Therelianceonalternativestrategiesregardingthetreatmentofcancerisnotsomething
exceptionalorspecifictotheVietnamesecase.Cancerpatientsfromaroundtheworlduse
traditionalandalternativetreatmentsagainstcancer.Onedoctorprovidedaninsightful
assessmentofhowthecancercure‘myth’mayhavespread(Interviewwithoncologist,HoChi
MinhCity,2013):
200AconfidentialcableleakedviaWikileaks(Aggler2008)suggestedthatPresidentNguyenMinhTriet’sprostatecancerreappearedin2008,leadingtoUSconcernsthattheeconomicreformerandanti-corruptionleaderwouldstepdown.Thediseasehadgoneintoremissionbythetimehebecamethecountry’spresidentin2006.Heservedafullfive-yeartermandsteppeddownfromofficein2011.201SeealsoHamHoaiNhan(2013)
168
“Youknow,manypatientsforexamplehere,afterradiationtreatmentandevenafterchemotherapy,thetumourorthemelanomawilldisappear,thirtypercent,eightypercent,butatthetimeofdischargetherewillstillremainasmalltumourhere,verysmall,smallerthanbefore.Butthetumourremainsonsite,somethinglikethis.Andthenthepatientgoestothetraditionalmedicinehospitalfortheirsupplementarytreatmentfromthetraditionalmedicineandafteracoupleofmonths,threemonthslater,thetumourdisappearscompletely,andmanypatientsbelievethatinthiscasewesternmedicinedoesnotworkverywell,becauseattheendofthetreatmentthetumourisstillonsite.Butwhentheygettraditionalmedicinethetumourdisappearscompletely.Theystronglybelievethattraditionalmedicinecouldmakehealthy,couldkillthetumour,youknow,inthethinking,inthemindofmany,manycancerpatientsthinklikethis.Butactually,basically,andweunderstand,inthiscasethebenefitcomesfromwesternmedicinebecauseyouknow,afterradiationandchemotherapythetumourcellwillbecuredbutnotimmediatelyatthesametime.”
PoliticalelitesarereveredandrespectedinVietnam.Thesuggestionthatthepresidentwas
healedthroughtheconsumptionofrhinohornmaywellhaveledtothedisseminationofthe
‘cancercuremyth’.Thesameoncologistrelatedhowthemajorityofhispatientswereseeking
rhinohornTCMasasecondarytreatment,oftenfallingvictimtofraudsters(seethechapter
onfakerhinohorn).Beyondthenarrativeabouttheformerpresident’srecoveryfromcancer,
researchinformantsspokeaboutthelinkbetweenrhinohornandpoliticalelites.One
informantprovidedinterestinginsightintothoselinks(Interview,Vietnam,2013):
“Youknow,buyingorsellingrhinoisillegalinVietnam,butactuallytherearesomeveryVIPwhogotcancerandtheyalsowanttobuyrhino,orevenfortheCommunistParty.Ithinktheyhaverhino.TheserhinoswillbeusedforVIP,whentheygotadiseaseorsomethinglikethis. Yeah,theyhaveliverhinos.Andifsomebodygetsadiseaseforexample,diabeticsorcancer,theywanttouserhinohornandtheywillgetapprovalfromtheCommunistPartyandtheycanuserhino.Butit’snotofficial.InprincipleaccordingtoVietnameselaw,rhinoisillegal.”
Thelinkofrhinohornconsumptiontopoliticaleliteshasdirectimplicationsregardinglegality
andlegitimacy,andtheprofferednotionof‘contestedillegality’.Ifpoliticaleliteswhoare
responsiblefortheenactmentandenforcementofillegalityarecomplicitthemselvesinthe
tradeandconsumptionofrhinohorn,thenthebanovertlylosessocialandpolitical
legitimacy.Ifpoliticalleadersfailtoleadbyexample,canweexpectotherstofollowthe
169
rules?AresearcherforaHanoi-basedNGOexplains(Interview,2013):“ForpeopleinVietnam,
illegalityisoflittlerelevanceasthereislittlecontrol.EverythinginVietnamisanegotiating
process.”TheheterogeneouscompositionofrhinohornTCMusersandthemassiveamount
offakerhinohornmedicinesincirculationrenderitdifficulttoassessthesizeofthemarket.
Consumerscomefromdifferentsocio-economicstrata.Especiallywhenitcomestothe
dreadeddiseaseofcancer,familymembersarewillingtospendtheirlastVietnameseDongin
ordertolengthenthelivesoftheirlovedones.Interestingly,TCMconsumerspaybetween
$25000to$45000perkilogramofrhinohorn(Interviewswithconsumersandtraders,2013)
whereasotherconsumergroupspayahigherpricerangingfrom$65000to$100000perkg
(Interviewswithconsumersandtraders,2013;feedbackfromKarlAmman,2015).
3.8Concludingremarks:Sacredvalueandcontestedillegality
CulturalbeliefsledtothesacralizationofrhinohorninAsiancommunities;however,therhino
itselfisnotimbuedwithsacredvalue.Thevaluationofrhinohorninconsumermarketstends
totrumpconservationandanti-poachinginitiativesinplacesgeographicallyfarremovedfrom
themarket.Thesanctityofancientbeliefsandsociallyacceptednormsnotonlysupersedes
rhinoconservationinitiativesbutalsointernationaltradebansanddomesticrules.Thehistory
oftheculturaluseofrhinohornwasdiscussedinthischapterwiththeobjectiveof
highlightingthedifficultiesassociatedwithattemptstoreversesocialnormsthatare
supportedbyculturalbeliefs.Whilefewconsumersupholdthequasi-mythicalvaluationof
rhinohornasamiraclecureforabouquetofailments,itstranscendentalandsacredvalue
remains,andexplains,inadditiontotheincreasingrarityofthespecies,thehighpriceof
rhinohorn.Thevaluationofrhinohornasaninvestmenttoolandstatussymbolbyactors
outsideAsiaalsoreifiesitshighprice.Moreover,thecomplicityoftheelite(e.g.political
elites,businessentrepreneursandthepolice)intheillegaltrade,distributionand
consumptionunderminethecredibilityofthecomparablynewtradeban.Incollective
societieswheretheeliteholdsconsiderablesway,membersofsocietyarelikelytoemulate
thebehaviourofheroes,businesselitesandrespectedleaders.Withregardstoresolvingthe
coordinationproblemofvalue(anessentialconditionformarketstoemerge),itisevident
thatrhinohornishighlyvaluedandcovetedinconsumermarkets.Thevaluationofrhinohorn
170
asasacredgoodprovidesconsumerswithanexitfrompossiblesocietalsanctionsthatusually
obtainfrombreakingthelaw.Notonlyistheconsumptionofrhinohornsociallylegitimate
andculturallyacceptedbutimportantrole-modelssupplyandconsumerhinohorntoo.
Consumersarecrucialactorsneededtoguaranteethecontinuityofillegalrhinohornflows.In
thisinstance,consumersdonotacceptthetradebanandlegitimizeillegaleconomicactivities
inreferencetoancientculturalbeliefsandsociallyacceptedpracticesthusreiteratingthe
notionofcontestedillegality.Thischapteralsoshowstheinterfacebetweenlegalityand
illegalitywherelegalandillegalusesarehardtodistinguish,andbothcriminalactorsand
upstandingcitizensofsocietypartakeinillegalmarketprocesses.Criticaltotheanalysisisthe
recognitionthattrophyhuntersandartcollectorslikewiseconstituteimportantconsumer
groups.Thecurrentusesofrhinohornarenot‘newuses’butleanonancientpractices
includingtheuseofrhinohornasstatussymbols,objetsd’artandgifting,aswellasforhealth
andmedicinalpurposes.Theinclusionofrhinohornasacancercureandaphrodisiacisa
clevermarketingployintendedtogrowthemarket.
171
Chapter4:Rhinoprotection:Parks,privatelandandconservationparadigms
“IntheAfricanversionofwildlifeconservationhistory,theexperiencehasbeenthatgamereservesarewhiteinventionswhichelevatewildlifeabovehumanityandwhichhaveservedasinstrumentsofdispossessionandsubjugation.NoAfricansbecamepartnersintheconservationistenterprise:eithertheirpresencewassufferedassquattersor‘courageousandloyalnativerangers’,ortheywerecastintheroleof‘evil,cruelpoachers’whowereabletostaveoffwagelabourbylivingofftheland(Carruthers1995:101).”
4.1IntroductionTheaimofthepreviouschapterwastoprovideahistoryofthedemandforrhinohorn,its
valuationasasacredgoodinAsianmarketsandcurrentconsumptionpatterns.Whileclimate
changeandhumanexpansionimpactthechancesofrhinosurvivalinthewild,therapacious
demandforrhinohornmayleadtothepachyderm’sextinctioninthenearfuture.Although
non-lethalmethodsofdehorningexist,illegalhunterskillanddehornrhinosinordertogetto
thehighly-covetedrhinohorn.Conservatorsandregulatorshavedevisedconservation
measurestoprotecttherhinoanddisruptillegalflowsofrhinohorn.Thischapterstartswith
reasonswhythemillennialgenerationmaywanttocontinuewithrhinoprotectioninspiteof
myriadchallengesaffectingconservationobjectives.Itthencontinueswithanassessmentof
protectiveandconservationregimes,includingcolonialconservationregulations,the
proclamationofgamereservesandnationalparks,theconservationofrhinosonprivateland,
aswellasthecreationoftransfrontierparks.Arguably,theestablishmentandexpansionof
conservationareashaveledtostructuralconditionsthatfacilitateratherthanfightrhino
poaching.Itwillbearguedthattheunderpinningconservationparadigmshaveledtoa
situationofhistoricallock-in,whichimpedesharmoniousrelationshipsbetweencommunities
livinginorclosetoconservationareasandwildlife.Infact,relationshipstendtobe
conceptualizedintermsofhuman-wildlifeconflict–alargelyantagonisticrelationship.The
privatizationandcommodificationofrhinoshavefurtherentrenchedconflict-ladensocial
relationsbetweenregulators,localAfricanpeopleandthepredominantlywhitelandowners.
172
4.2Whyshouldrhinosbeprotected?Avarietyofactorsattributesrhinoswithintrinsicand/orinstrumentalvalue.Theformer
relatestothecontentionthatthewildanimalhasavalueinitsownright(anendinitself)
whilethelatterrelatestothefunctionaluseofrhinos(meanstoanend).Whileadiscussionof
animalethicsisbeyondtheremitofthisdissertation,itsufficestomentionthatthe
instrumentalvalueofrhinosislikelytobeofgreaterinteresttoregulators.Theinstrumental
valueappealstoregulators,whotendtorespondtothevagariesofcostandbenefit
calculationswhenconsideringnewregulationsaimedatdisruptingillegalmarkets.Justusand
colleagues(2009:187)defineentitiesasinstrumentallyvaluable“totheextenttheyareorwill
beconsideredvaluablebyvaluers,suchashumansandperhapsothercognitivecomplex
organisms”.Oneoftheinstrumentalvaluesofrhinosisthatwithinitsimmediateenvironment
therhinohassomeimportantfunctions:Thewhiterhinoprovides“grazinglawns”forsmaller
herbivores(itswidemouthandlipshavelawnmower-likequalities)andallrhinospecies
(includingthe3Asiansub-species)assistinspreadingtheseedsandseedlingsofmanyplants
(AfricaGeographic2012a).Arecentacademicpapersuggeststhattherhino,liketheelephant
orwolf,mightbeamightbeakeystonespecies(Cromsigt/teBeest2014).ASouthAfrican
conservatorexplainsthesignificanceofkeystonespeciesasfollows(Interviewwith
Conservator5,2013):
“Therhinoisakeystonespecies,andwearecustodiansofourbiodiversity.Weareinextricablylinked.Ifthehoneybeegoes,wearegoneasaspecies.Soweusetherhinoasasymbolofthebiggerpicture.”
InthecontextoftheKrugerNationalPark,therhinomayhaveanimpactonthestructureand
compositionofthesavannahgrasslands(Cromsigt/teBeest2014).Itsdemisemaythusaffect
thechancesforsurvivalofotherspeciesoffaunaandflora.CromsigtandteBeest(2014:566)
found:
“[O]urresultshighlightthatthecurrentrhinopoachingcrisismaynotonlyaffectthespecies,butalsothreatenthepotentialkeyroleofthismegaherbivoreasadriverofsavannahfunctioning.”
Iftherhinoweretogoextinctinitshomerange,itsdisappearancewouldnotonlyhavean
emotionalimpactonrhinoadmirersbutisalsolikelytoaffectthelocalecosystemand
173
biodiversity.
Thepreviouschaptergaveanoverviewoftheglobalsystemofbeliefleadingtothesacral
valuationofrhinosandrhinohorns.Whiletheanimalrightsmovementfocusesonthe
intrinsicvalueofanimals,culturalbeliefsinsouthernAfricalikewiseappreciatetheanimalper
seasaculturalandspiritualsentientbeing,worthyofreverenceandprotection(seesection
ontheSanandShonapeoplesinsouthernAfricainChapter3).Jones(1999:298)providesan
example:
“LikemanyWesternersfromdevelopedcountries,manyruralAfricansvaluewildlifeforitsexistenceandwishtheirchildrenandgrandchildrentobeabletoenjoyseeingwildanimals.”
Therhinobelongstoagroupofanimalspeciesidentifiedascharismaticmegafauna.Animals
liketheelephantorrhinoinvokeempathy,personificationandanthropomorphismamongst
people.Suchsentimentsmayleadtomaterialassistanceanddonationsforconservation
initiatives.Moreover,therhinoisoneofthemaintouristattractionsingameparks.While
trophyhuntingisthesubjectofnormativeandmoralcontestationinmodernnarratives,for
thesakeofcompleteness,theroleoftherhinoinBigFivetrophyhuntingsafarisisalso
acknowledged.Infact,oneobjectiveofearlyprotectionregimeswastheconservationof
wildlifeforthepurposesofsportshunting,apasttimereservedfortheupperstrataof
colonialsocietyinsouthernAfrica.Theremainderofthechaptertouchesonthespecific
motivationsofwhyactorschoosetoprotecttherhino.
4.3ColonialconservationmeasuresinSouthAfrica
AfterJanvanRiebeeckandtheDutchEastIndiaCompanyarrivedattheCapeofGoodHopein
1652,thelivesandfortunesofindigenous202andlocalpeopleandwildanimalschanged
forever.Intheprocessofcolonization,Africanslostpropertyandhuntingrights,andsystemic
exploitationwasinstitutedfirstbycolonialrulers,andsubsequentlyreinforcedduringthe
202Theterm“indigenous”peopleisusedtodepictFirstNationspeopleinsouthernAfrica(theSanpeople–comparewithChapter3)whereas“local”peoplerefertootherAfricancommunities,whosettledinsouthernAfrica.
174
apartheidregime.Thescalestippedtowardsoverexploitationofthestillabundantwildlife
shortlyaftertheEuropeancolonizersarrived.ThefirstcolonialadministratorJanvanRiebeeck
decreedthefirstpoachinglawamerefiveyearsafterlandingattheCape.Hedeclaredwild
animalsasresnullius.Accordingtothislegalprinciple,whoevercapturedorkilledawild
animal,ownedit(Couzens2003:4).Theearlycolonialsettlerssurvivedthroughhunting,
whichservedthepurposeoflandclearance,incomegenerationandprovisionofmeatto
avoidslaughteringthesettlers’livestock.Settlersoftenemployedtheservicesoflocalpeople
onwhosehuntingskillstheycametorely(Beinart2003:31;Carruthers1993:6).
In1822,LordCharlesSomersetpassedthefirstpieceofBritishcoloniallegislationthatdealt
withtheprotectionofwildlife.203Ofparticularsignificancewasthedelineationofwhowas
allowedtohuntandwhowasproscribedfromdoingso.Oneoftheproclamationsdeclared
specifically:“[I]tisfoundthatmanyidleanddisorderlypersons,ofinferiorclassesoflife,who
oughttobedependentupontheirindustry,wasteandmisspendtheirtimedestroyinggame
(quotedin:Couzens2003:66).”MimickingBritishanti-poachinglaws,thecolonialrulers
assertedhuntingrightsfortheBritishrulingclasses.TheserightsaffectednotonlytheAfrican
communitiesbutalsotheAfrikanerswhocommencedtheGreatTrektoescapeBritishrule
andfoundedtheBoerrepublicsduringthe19thcentury.UponsettlingintheTransvaal,204the
Voortrekkercommunitydependedon“indiscriminatehunting”.LocalAfricansandthe
Afrikanerscollaboratedinkilling,tradingandclearingofwildlifeuntilitbecamearare
resource(Carruthers1993:12).
In1846,thefirstpieceofconservationlegislationwaspassedintheTransvaal.Thelawwas
ostensiblydesignedtopreventwastage;inotherwords,hunterswereaskedto“killonlywhat
theyneeded”–theamountremainedundefined–(Couzens2003:66).Towardstheendof
the19thcentury,astheherdsofwildlifehadbeenseverelydiminished,theAfrikaners
excludedindigenouspopulationsfromthehuntingoffree-rangingwildlifebywayof203Somersetproclaimed,amongstothers,a“closeseason”of5months(nohuntingwasallowedduringthosefivemonths;thehippopotamus,elephantandbontebokweredeclaredroyalgame(aspecialhuntingpermitwasrequired);alicensewasrequiredforhuntingandslaveswerenotpermittedtohunt(Couzens2003:66).204TheTransvaalwasoneofthetwoBoerrepublics(theotherwastheOrangeFreeState),whichwerebothintegratedintotheUnionofSouthAfricain1910.Inpost-apartheidSouthAfrica,vastswathesoftheTransvaalprovinceformpartoftheGautengprovince.
175
conservationregulations.AsthewhiteAfrikanersstartedtoassertlandandfarmingrights,
huntingandlandrightsbecameintertwined.205Wildlifehadthelegalstatusofresnullius;
hence,privatelandownersstrictlyenforcedtrespassingregulationstohaltAfricansandpoor
whitesfromhuntingontheirland(Carruthers1993:13).Enclosureandboundarydemarcation
oflandfurtherdisownedlocalpeople.TheFencingActsof1883and1910afforded
landownersanotherlayerofprotectionandcontroloverthelandanditsproductivecapacity.
TheselawsledtothefurtherdisempowermentofAfricanpeople,foreverchangingthesocial
relationsofruraldwellers.Inparticular,the1887SquattersLawandtheNativeLandActof
1913206laidthefoundationsofapartheidsegregationandbirthednewlegaldesignationsof
trespass,poachingandsquatting(Meskell2012:16–17).Whileonemightthinkthatthese
conservationregulationssoughttoprotectwildlife,inreality,theycanonlybeunderstoodin
thecontextofcolonialexploitationofAfricanpeople.
Despitetherestrictedaccesstofirearms,huntingdogs,aswellasthewithdrawalofhunting
andlandownershiprights,Africanpeoplereceivedtheblamefortheannihilationofwildlifein
theTransvaal.Withhistoricalhindsight,aconfluenceofdestructiveforcessuchasagricultural
transformation,modernizationandindustrializationseemtohaveplayedtheirrolewhilethe
huntingbythelandownerswasequallydevastatingonwildlifenumbers(Carruthers1993:13).
Anothersignificantaimoftheearlyhuntinglawswasthecreationofanindigenousworkforce
thatwasreliantonincomefromwagesfortheirlivelihoods.ManyAfricanshadmaintained
theireconomicindependencefromEuropeansettlersbyhuntingandtradingwildlifeand
carryingonwiththeirpastoralistandagriculturallife-styles.Throughthehuntingbanand
205Landownershipandhuntingrightsbecamecontestedissueswiththearrivalofthecolonialsettlers.LocalcommunitiessuchastheTsongaslivinginthenortheasternpartsofthecountry(inthemodernKrugerNationalParkandLimpopoProvince)hadadifferentperceptionofprivateownershipofproperty.Chiefsallocatedlandtoanypersonwantingtoliveinthechiefdom,subjecttothatpersonabidingbytherulesofthetribe.Peoplewerefreetochoosewheretoreside,buttheyhadtoaskforpermissionfromthechiefwhentheywantedtomovetoanotherchiefdom.Accordingtothisunderstanding,thelandwasneverprivateproperty;however,membershipofthetribeensuredaccesstolandandlanduserights(Nefale2002:19).PeoplecouldnotbeevictedfromtheirplaceofresidenceunlesstheyhadcommittedaseriousoffenceorviolatedarulesetbytheChieforhisheadmen(Nefale2002:12).Thisnotionofcommunallandownershipstoodinstarkcontrasttothecolonialapproachthatpromotedlandappropriationandprivateownershiprights.Insomecases,chiefshadmadeland‘voluntarily’availabletothewhitesettlers;theyhad,ofcourse,theirconceptionoflandownershipinmind.Meanwhile,thenewcoloniallandownerswereatlibertytoevictpeopleoftheirlandwiththefullbackingofthelaw(Nefale2002:12).206AfricanswereprohibitedfrombuyingorleasingpropertyoutsideareasdemarcatedasAfricanreserves.
176
othercolonialmeasures,thecolonial‘masters’hadcreatedaworkforceconsistingof
individualswhowerenolongerself-sufficientanddependedonincomefromworkingin
minesandotherindustrialendeavours(Carruthers1993:13).
Whiletheearlywildlifeprotectionmeasuresservedthecolonialobjectives,latermeasures
weredrivenbythedesiretopreservewildlifeforsportshunting.Attheturnofthe19th
century,gamereservesweredesignedtoprovide“freefromallhumaninterference,a
sanctuaryinwhichcertainspeciesofwildlifecouldprosper”(Carruthers1993:13).Theearly
gamereservesofTransvaal,forexample,weretobelocatedonlandconsideredbarren,
disease-riddenandworthlesstomininginterests.Eventuallythese“stategamefarming
enterprises”weretobeopenedtosportsmen,whowouldpaythestateforhuntingprivileges
(Carruthers1993:14).Whilethelanddevotedtogamereserveswasuninterestingtoother
industries,nationalandprovincialparkswereestablishedonsought-afterrealestate.These
parksentail“theutilizationofanareathroughactivemanagementforthebenefitofthe
ecosystemandvisitors”.Thus,gamereservesandnationalparkshaddifferentaimsandlegal
foundations.Whilegamereservescouldbeestablishedandabolishedbyproclamation,
nationalparkswerelegallysecureandeconomicallyviable(Carruthers1993:13).Indigenous
andlocalAfricanpropertyandhuntingrights,andancestralburialgrounds(whichare
significantculturalsites)werenotconsideredwhenreservesandparkswereproclaimed.207
Awell-knownexamplerelatestotheKrugerNationalPark,whichwasagamereservebefore
itbecamethesignaturenationalparkofSouthAfrica.ThefirstWardenoftheSabiGame
Reservewasofthebeliefthatpeopleandgamereserveswerealethalcombination.
InfluencedbyhisEuropeanheritage,JamesStevenson-HamiltonhadAfricansevictedfromthe
landlocatedinthemodernKNP.HisactionsearnedhimthenameSkukuza(hewhosweeps
clean)208amongthelocalShangaancommunity(Carruthers1995:92).Inofficialnarratives,
thefirstwardenwaslaudedfor“saving”theAfrican“wilderness”.Africanhistoricalnarratives
weresilencedintheprocessofcreatingtheseparksandreserves(Meskell2012:63).Oral
207MorethanhalfoftheareaoftheKrugerNationalParkissubjecttolandclaimsbylocalclaimantsinpost-apartheidSouthAfrica.208Skukuzaisthenameofthemainadministrativerest-campinthepresent-dayKrugerNationalPark.
177
historiesoftheShangaanpeopleandarchaeologicalsitesdocumentthatseveralthousand
indigenouspeoplewerelivingintheareaofthemodernKNPmorethan2000yearsbefore
theEuropeansettlersarrived.Thesetribeswerescatteredinnumeroussettlements.There
werenoboundarieswithMozambique,SwazilandorZimbabweandpeoplemovedfreely
amongstchiefdomsunlesstherewasstrife(Meskell2012;Nefale2002).
Asthereserveswereextendedinsize,thecolonialauthoritiessoonrealizedthatthevast
gamereservescouldnotberunlike“amedievalEuropeandeerpreserve”(Carruthers1993:
14).TheyrequiredAfricanlabourandfundingtorunthereserves.Consequently,thepolicy
wasreversed,andso-calledblack‘tenants’hadtopayrentthroughlabourorcash(Carruthers
1993:14).Inexchangeforanobligatoryperiodofthreemonthsoflabour,tenantswere
allowedtoconductagriculturalandpastoralistactivitiesprovidedthesedidnotcontravene
conservationregulations.Whitegamerangershadthetaskofoverseeingthelabourers,
therebyassertinganotherlayerofcontrol(Carruthers1993:15).Aftertheestablishmentof
theUnionofSouthAfrica,209thepolicyongamereserveswasrevisited.Thelandwasneeded
forAfricanandwhiteagriculturalexpansion,andtosatisfythegrowingdemandsformining
explorationsandindustrialdevelopment.BeforetheproclamationoftheKNPin1926,alarge
areaalongthemodernwesternboundaryoftheKNPwasexcisedfromtheSabiGameReserve
anddeclaredan‘Africanreserve’.210ThelastforcefulremovalfromtheKNPinvolvedthe
MakulekepeoplewhohadbeenlivingbetweentheLevhubuandLimpoporiversinthePafuri
area.TheircommunallandwasincorporatedintotheKNPin1969(Carruthers1995:99)and
becamesubjecttoasuccessfullandclaiminpost-apartheidSouthAfrica.
Whetherbanishedfromthereservesandparksorlivingonitsperipheries,Africanscontested
thecreationoftheseconservationentitiesandassociatedmeasures.Poachingofwildlife
becameameansofexpressingtheirunhappinessasmuchasitbecameanecessitytoprevent
deathfromstarvationafterseveredroughtsandboutsofRinderpest(Carruthers1995:93).
Interestingly,thehistoryofcross-borderpoachingexpeditionslaunchedfromMozambique
canbetracedbacktotheearlydaysofthe20thcentury:
209In1910,thefourcolonieswereamalgamatedintotheUnionofSouthAfricaunderBritishdominion.210DuetotheirproximitytothewesternboundaryoftheKrugerNationalPark,Acornhoek,andmanyothervillagesandtownshipshavebecomethespringboardfromwheremodernpoachingexpeditionsarelaunched.
178
“PoachingpartiesfromMozambiquewerelarge,wellorganizedandaccompaniedbymanydogs.Theyalsohadfirearms,unlikeTransvaalAfricanswhowerenotpermittedtobeararms,andtheAfricanstaffofthegamereserve,carryingonlyassegais,waspowerlessagainstthem(Carruthers1995:93).”
Fromthe1930sonwardsthedominantpolicyofnationalparksandreserveswastopreserve
the“wilderness”withouthumanhabitation.Underpinningthisendeavourwasthemythical
idealofuntamedwildAfricabasedonfictionsofterranullius(emptylands)priortothe
Europeancolonialarrivals.Essentiallythecombinednotionsofterranulliusandresnullius
(wildlifecouldnotbeowned)createdanoppositionalbinaryofnatureversus(African)
culture.Colonialregulatorsstampedlocalpeopleandtheirculturalheritageasintrusiveand
destructiveandoptedtopreservewhatwasleftof‘wildAfrica’withoutindigenousinfluences
(Meskell2012:117).Tosuittheidealofanuntouched,pristinewilderness,millenniaof
Africanhistorywerewipedclear(Meskell2012:18).Acaseinpointistheneglectof
archaeologicalrecords(especiallyinKrugerNationalPark)thatshowthattheseso-called
‘wilderness’areashadbeeninhabitedbyAfricanminingandtradingcommunities(Cock/Fig
2000:133;Meskell2012).Intheprocessoffencingin“fortressreserves”,anirreconcilable
distancewascreatedbetweennatureand(African)culture.AsMeskell(2012:18–19)
observes:
“Themonolithicdesiretosavewildlife,regardlessoftheharmthateffortmightcauselivingcommunities,hasledconservationiststoidealizenationalparksastheultimatemoralgoodwhileeschewingtheimmoralityofdestroyinghumanlifeways(…)Connectionstohistoricorancestralsitesandongoingtraditionsareattenuatedandculturalandnaturalheritagesremainoppositional.”
Africansweremovedtoruralareasontheperipheryofparks,whichwereovercrowdedand
devoidofopportunitiesforsocialmobility.Withtheadventoftheformalizedsystemof
apartheidin1948,Africanpeopleexperienced“doubleexclusion”fromnationalparks.They
weredeniedvisitor’saccesstotheparksandsystematicallyexcludedfromthegovernanceof
parks(Cock/Fig2000:132).211ParkssuchastheKNPcametorepresentanothermechanismof
211Untilthe1980sblackvisitorstotheKrugerNationalParkcouldonlyovernightattherudimentarilyequippedBaluletentedcamp.EconomicdeprivationthroughapartheidrestrictedaccessfurtherasfewAfricanshadaccesstocarsanddispensableincometoaffordvacations(Cock/Fig2000:132).
179
apartheidrule.TheapartheidregimeactivelypromotedtheviewthatAfrikanershadsetup
nationalparksandtheblackpopulationcametoperceiveparksas“manifestationsof
apartheid”.TheterribleironybetweenAfricanshavingtomovetoso-calledhomelandswhile
animalswereprotectedontheirformerlandisstriking.ThegoverningboardoftheKNPdid
littletoelevatethesituation,insteadminutesofmeetingsreflectthatAfricanswerelabelled
as“cannibals”,“bloodthirstybarbarians”and“poachersundoubtedlythemostbloodthirsty,
cruellestandmostruthlessoftheearth’sinhabitants”(citedbyCarruthers1995:100).In
attrition,theKNPalsoservedasaspringboardformilitaryoperationsoftheapartheidregime,
includingthetrainingofSouthAfricanDefenceForce(SADF)soldiers,thecovertsupplyof
militarysupportandsuppliestoResistênciaNacionalMoçambicana(RENAMO)in
MozambiqueandthelaunchofachemicalweaponsattackagainstFrentedeLibertaçãode
Moçambique(FRELIMO),alsoinMozambique(Cock/Fig2000:132).Moreover,boththeKNP
andNdumoGameReservewereconsideredstrategicbufferzonespreventingtheentryof
undocumentedmigrantsandguerrillafighters.TwomilitaryunitswerebasedintheKNP:One
dealtwiththeprotectionofwildlife,theotherwiththedetectionandarrestofundocumented
migrantsfromMozambique(MacKenzie1998).Theapartheidregimeusedso-called
conservationareasthusnotonlyforconservationbutalsoformilitarypurposes.Perhapsnot
surprising,manyoftheformerapartheidmilitarycounter-insurgencyoperativeshavefounda
newhomeinanti-poachingunitsinthenewSouthAfrica,creatingfurtherdistancebetween
localblackcommunitiesandconservation.
TheearlyhistoryofnatureconservationinSouthAfricaisthusdeeplyintertwinedwiththe
colonialprojectandthesystematicexploitationofAfricanpeople,leadingtoland
expropriation,thelossofhuntingrightsandforcedlocalpeopleintoexploitativelabour
relationshipswithcolonialsettlers.Theconnectionofconservation,parksandwildanimals
withstructuralviolenceexperiencedbylocalpeoplerenderswildlifeconservationahighly
contentiousissue,whichrequiresmorethanatacitacknowledgmentthatwrongswere
committed.Thefollowingsectionshighlighthowconsecutiveandparallelconservation
regimesfollowedasimilarpathway,furtheralienatingandside-lininglocalpeople.
180
4.4Privaterhinos:ThecommodificationandprivatizationoftherhinoThissectionprovidesabriefbackgroundtotheemergenceofprivateownershipofrhinosand
thewildliferanchingindustryinSouthAfrica,ZimbabweandNamibia212inthe1960s.Wildlife
numbershadbeengreatlydecimatedoutsidedesignatedconservationareasinSouthAfrica
bythe1950s.Farmersperceivedofwildanimals213asvermin,andtheyappearedtoposea
significantthreattodomesticlivestockbycompetingforwaterandgrazingwhilesupposedly
carryingdeadlydiseases.Theunderlyingmantraof“youcan’tfarminazoo”ledtothe
conversionoflargetractsofsemi-aridsavannahintoagriculturallandduringthe1800sand
early1900s.Individualaswellaspubliclandusedecisionswerelargelymotivatedbyshort–
termeconomicplanningandledtoapreferenceforlandusepracticesthatyieldedtradable,
consumableandprofitablecommodities(Krug2001:5).Theapparentadvantagesofthese
conventionalformsofagriculturalproductionwerefurtherreinforcedbygenerousstate
subsidiesprovidedtowhitelandownersinSouthAfricaandNamibia(whichwasadministered
212NamibiaisthesecondlargestrhinorangestateinAfrica.Asof31December2012,theAfricanRhinoSpecialistGrouprecorded2274rhinos,ofwhich524weresouthernwhiterhinosand1750wereblackrhinos(CITESSecretariat2013).WhileIwasconductingfieldworkin2012and2013,onlyisolatedpoachingincidentshadoccurredinNamibiasincethelate1980s.Atotalof6(known)rhinoswerepoachedbetween2006and2012.InlightofthepoachingcrisishappeninginneighbouringSouthAfrica,thequestionarosewhyNamibiawasbeingsparedfromrhinopoaching.Expertssurmisedthatthiswaslinkedtorhinosbeingscatteredacrossdry,aridandfar-flungregionsofNamibia,theexistenceofasuccessfulcommunityconservancyprogrammeandlackofsupportinfrastructureforcriminalnetworks.Unfortunately,thestatusquohaschanged:In2014,24blackrhinoswerepoached,andaconsignmentof14rhinohornswasintercepted.Afurther81rhinoswerepoachedinthearidcountryin2015.NamibiagaineditsindependencefromSouthAfricain1990.Sincegainingindependence,theNamibiangovernmentdevelopednewconservationinstitutionsandlaws.Thesenewinitiativesincludethefamousprogrammeofcommunityconservancies,forwhichreformedpoachersarerecruitedasrhinoguardians.Thecommunityconservancyprogrammeincorporatescommunitybeneficiationandclosecooperationwithchiefs,headmen/womenandneighbouringfarmers.Namibianconservatorsdevelopedthenovelandsomewhatcontestedmethodofdehorningrhinosasaconservationmethodinthe1980s.Inlightofthepoachingincidentsduring2014,theNamibiangovernmentannounceditsplantodehornallrhinosinnationalparksandprivateconservanciesduring2015(Njini13October2014).InterviewswithroguewildlifeprofessionalsandconvictedpoachersinSouthAfricaindicatedthatillegalhuntinganddehorningwasalsotakingplaceinNamibia,involvingbothNamibianandSouthAfricanwildlifeprofessionals(Interviews,2013).213Alegalandsemanticdifferenceappliestotheterms‘wildanimals’,‘wildlife’and‘game’.Thetermsareoftenusedinterchangeablywithoutregardtothenuancedmeanings.Theterm‘wildlife’isusedforindigenousanimalswhile‘game’isusedforanimalsthatarehuntedforamusementorina‘fairchase’(Carruthers2008:162).AccordingtoSouthAfricancommonlaw,wildanimals(feraebestiae)are:“[T]hoseanimalsthatexistinawildstateanywhereintheworld.Theseanimalsarewildbynatureandincludenotonlythoseanimalsthataresavagebynaturebutalsothoseofamorewildandtimidnatureandcannotbeclassifiedasdomesticanimals”(LAWSA2014b).‘Ordinarygame’and‘protectedwildanimals’aresub-categoriesof‘wildanimals’,whichaffectspropertyrightsandliabilityfortheirbehaviour(LAWSA2014a).
181
bySouthAfrica)aftertheascendancyoftheNationalPartytopowerandtheriseofthe
apartheidregimeinthelate1940s(comparewithTable5).
Table5:Thechangingpoliticalecologyofwildlife
Phase Economicandpoliticalevents Wildlifeconservationandutilization
Pre-industrialeconomy Lowhumanpopulations • Uselimitedbyabilityorcostsofharvesting• Institutionsaimedatsharingspoilsofthehunt
Frontiereconomy Industrialrevolution Europeancolonialexpansion
• Costsofharvestinggreatlyreducedbytechnology• Technologyandglobalizationincreasemarketaccess• Fewrulesornormstocontroluse
Wildlifeisnationalized AgriculturalexpansionafterWorldWarIIUrbanizationofWesternsociety • Controlofwildlifecentralizedinthestate
• Commercialusegreatlyrestricted Sustainableuseapproach Landreforminpostcolonialsocieties
EmergenceoftransfrontierconservationareasLandreformandetransfrontierconservation
• Useofwildlifedevolvedtolandholders(andlater,communities)• Commercialusesencouraged
Source:adaptedfromChild(2012:2)
Commencinginthe1960s,anumberofparallelprocessesresultedinwhatsomehavetermed
“aconservationrevolutioninSouthAfrica”(Bothma/Rooyen/Rooyen2004:840).The
developmentofwildliferanchingcontributedtothecommodificationandprivatizationof
wildlifeingeneral,andtherhinoinspecific;furtherentrenchingpropertyrightsofthewhite
elitewhiledeprivingblackcommunitiesofthesame.Theparallelprocessesincludescientific,
environmental,institutional,legalandbroadersocio-politicalandstructuralprocesses,which
ledtopublicofficials,corporationsandprivateindividualsrecognizingtheeconomicvalueof
wildanimalsthroughconsumptiveandnon-consumptiveformsofwildliferanching.
Essentiallytheseprocessescreatedaformalandlegalmarketforliverhinosandrhino
productsonthesupplysidewhilealsoproducingagrowingpoolofdisenfranchisedblackrural
communitieswithlimitedmeanstogenerateincome.Rhinos(andotherwildanimals)didnot
onlyassistinfillingdepletedstatecoffersthroughthesaleofliveanimalstoconservation
organizationsandprivateinvestors,buttheyalsopresentedalucrativereturnoninvestments
asimmediateprofit-generatingassetstoeconomicelites(Interviewwithwildlifeprofessional,
2013).Inpre-Conventiontimes,thelegalmarketinrhinohorninvolvedthetradeoflive
rhinos,rhinohornsandthehuntingofrhinosforsportstrophies.Aswillbeshowninlater
sections,theearlyyearsprovidedthefoundationsforcertaincriminalactivitiestoflourishand
forgraychannelstodevelopintofully-fledgedillegalsupplychains.
182
Theinstitutionalrecognitionofwildliferanchingasalegitimateagriculturalactivityrequired
boththenationalgovernmentandprovincialpublicservantstoovercomebureaucraticinertia
andpathdependency,whichalsoaffectedtheapartheidbureaucracy.Bureaucratsinthe
nationalMinistryofAgriculturehadrigidideasastowhatconstituted“agriculture”andasa
result,therewaslimitedsupportfortheinclusionofwildliferanchingasaviablelanduse
optioninthe1960s.Moreover,theDepartmentofVeterinaryAffairsconsideredwildanimals
asathreattodomesticanimalsduetothepotentialfortransmissionofdiseases.Scientific
interestingameranchinghademergedintheformerRhodesia(Zimbabwe)andelsewherein
Africainthelate1950sandearly1960s.Possiblyinspiredthroughthediffusionofregional
andinternationaltrends,thethenTransvaalDirectorateofNatureConservation214tookthe
leadandcommissionedseveralscientificstudiestoresearchtheviabilityandsustainabilityof
gameranchingonprivatelandintheearly1960s.Withoutgoingintothefinerdetailsofthe
variousstudies,215scientistscommentedontheunsuitabilityofhigh-intensityfarming
practicesonmarginalfarmland.Whilegameranchingwasneithertoutedasthesilverbullet
tofuturefoodproductioninAfrica,thesustainabilityoftheagriculturalsectornorasawildlife
conservationapproach,itwasperceivedtoofferviablealternativestofailingfarming
enterprises(Carruthers2008:168).Therewasmountingscientificagreementthat“killing
wildlifecommerciallywasecologicallyacceptable(evendesirable)”(ibid).Thepracticeof
cullingandsellingwildlifewasalreadybeingimplementedinSouthAfricannationalparkssuch
astheKNP,wherewildlifemanagersassessedanddeterminedthe“carryingcapacity”ofthe
ecosystem,and“excess”numberswerecroppedtoachieve“acceptable”numbersofwildlife
(Carruthers2008:168).Onaregionallevel,manyconservatorsweremovingfromthe
preservationistconservationparadigmtothesustainableuseparadigm,whichprofferedthe
newmantraof‘useitorloseit’(Child2012:2)orinmodernSouthAfricanparlance‘ifitpays
itstays’(Interviews,2013).Technologicalinnovationssuchasaerialcensusestocountwildlife
214From1910to1994,theSouthAfricanprovinceofTransvaalwaslocatednorthoftheVaalRiveranditscapitalwasPretoria.Afterthefirstdemocraticelectionsin1994,thecountrywasdividedintonine9provinces,andtheTransvaalprovinceceasedtoexist.215Scientists,forexample,pointedtothesuitabilityofwildanimals(especiallyungulates)togrowingreatnumbersonaridandsemi–aridland,whichotherwiselaybarrenorhadbecomeecologicallyandfinanciallyunprofitable,orwherelivestockhadbeenaffectedbydeadlydiseasessuchasthehighlycontagiousherbivorediseaseRinderpestorbytheTsetsefly(carrierofthesleepingsickness).Wildanimalswereimmunetomanydiseasesafflictingdomesticlivestockwhilealsowell–suitedforprovidinganimalproteinforthegrowingpopulationnumbersinSouthAfrica(Carruthers2008:167–168).
183
byfixed-wingaircraftorhelicoptersandthedevelopmentofsedativedartingtechnologies
andopioidtranquilizers,aswellasgamecaptureandtranslocationsmethodsfurtherassisted
theadvancementofwildlifemanagement,whichevolvedinconjunctionwithbiologicaland
ecologicalstudiesintoafully-fledgedfieldofscientificinquiry,conservationapproachand
industry(Carruthers2008:168).Centraltounderstandingwhattheprivatizationand
commodificationofwildlifemeanttolocalcommunitiesisanappreciationoftheresultant
marginalizationandcriminalizationofthesecommunities,whichthefollowingsections
highlight.
4.4.1Privateownershiprights
Theinstitutionalturneventuallyhappenedinthe1970swhenboththeagriculturalandnature
conservationbureaucraciesbegantoappreciatetheprofitabilityofthesector.However,the
issueofproprietyhadtoberesolvedfirst.Itwasalreadymentionedabovethatwildanimals
areconsideredresnulliusunderSouthAfricancommonlaw,meaningthatnobodyowns
them.216Untilthe1960s,twoconditionshadtobemetforownershipofaresnulliustobe
recognized:“[T]heoccupiermusttakecontroloftheobject(occupatio),withtheintentionof
becomingtheowner(animuspossidendi).”(Glazewski2000:opcit).217Theprincipleofres
nulliushadprovidedthebackboneofexpropriationofindigenouslyownedlandandwildlife
duringcolonialtimes.Asanindirectbeneficiary218ofthesaleoflicensesforthehuntingof
wildanimals(vanHoven2015:272),thestatehadlittleincentivetoconvertwildanimalsinto
privatepropertyatfirst.
216Wildanimalsfallintothecategoryofresintracommercium(objectsthatcanbeowned)asopposedtothingsincapableofprivateownership,whichisconnectedtotheprincipleofresextracommercium(suchastheseaandseashore)(Glazewski2000:426).217Becausewildanimalstendtoroamormigratefreelyacrosstheland,itproveddifficulttodeterminetheextentofphysicalcontrolnecessarytoestablishlegalownershipofwildanimals.Anotherquestionrelatedtothespecificpointatwhichanestablishedownerofawildanimallosesownershipshoulditescapeorstray(Glazewski2000:427).218Provincialauthoritieshandlehuntingpermits.
184
However,whiletheprincipleofresnulliusappliedtowildanimals,privatelandowners
showedlimitedinterestinpreservingwildlifewithnotangibleeconomicbenefitsaccruing
otherthantheintrinsic,aestheticandsymbolicvalueofwildlife.Ironically,thelegalprinciple
thathadservedindigenousexpropriationandwhiteappropriationoflandandwildlifeduring
thecolonialperiodfailedtoprotectsufficientlytheinterestsoftheemerginggameranching
industry.Asaresult,therewereabouttenprivately-ownedgameranchesinSouthAfricaby
the1960s(Bothma/Suich/Spenceley2012:147)whilewildlifewasalmostexclusively
conservedonstate-ownedland.Itisparticularlynoteworthythatitwasthestatethat
providedtheimpetustostimulateprivatizationofconservation.Atthetimeconservation
agenciespursuedtheambitiousconservationobjectiveofreinstatingspeciesthathadgone
locallyextinct,totheirhistoricalrangebywayofnewlydevelopedtranslocationmethods.The
rangeexpansionprojectextendedbeyondpublicparksandconservationareas.Especiallythe
formerNatalParksBoard(nowEzemveloKZNWildlife)subsidizedtheprocurementofwild
animalsbyprovidingthemfreeofchargeorbelowmarketvaluetoprivateindividualsinthe
1960sand1970s(discussedinmoredetaillaterinthischapter).Thiswouldnotonlyprovide
speciesteeteringonthebrinkofextinctionwithafightingchanceatsurvivalandrecovery,but
itwouldalsoincreasethetotalareaavailabletoconservationandcreatebufferzones
adjacenttostate-ownedconservationland(Interviewswithconservators10&11,2013).The
TransvaalDirectorateofNatureConservationagaintookupaleadershiprolebyintroducing
the‘certificateofadequateenclosure’in1968,whichwassubsequentlyrolledouttothe
otherprovinces.Thiscertificateexemptedlandownersfromregulationsapplicabletohunting
seasonsandbaglimits,meaningthatwildanimalsthuscouldbehuntedallyearround.
Landownerswereinvitedtoapplyforthecertificateiftheycoulddemonstrateadequate
game-prooffencing(Reilly2014).219Uponprovisionofproofofadequateenclosure,game
rancherscouldalsoapplyforgovernmentsubsidiesintimesofdroughtorothernatural
disasters(vanHoven2015:106).Inessence,gamefarmersweregrantedownershipof
wildlifeandtherighttoderiveincomefromconsumptiveutilization,suchasthekillingofwild
animalsforprofit(Lindsey/Roulet/Romañach2007:463).Beyondfencinginwildanimalsand
claimingownershiprightsbothoverlandandwildanimals,thismovefurthercementedthe
219Amulti-strandnine-footfencedesignedtokeepwildanimalsinsidethegameranchconstitutedtheminimumstandardofadequateenclosure(Reilly2014).
185
alienationanddeprivationofrural,localcommunitiesfromaccesstolandandresources.
Oncethesepropertyandownershiprightshadbeenasserted,subsistencehuntingongame
farmswasinevitablybrandedaspoachingandaccessingprivatelandforthepurposesof
seekinggrazing,waterormedicinalplantswasdeemedasthecriminaloffenceof
‘trespassing’.TheapartheidregimeemployedthiscategoryofcrimetopreventblackSouth
Africansfrommovingaroundfreelyindemarcated“whites-only”areas,whichincludedparks,
privatelandandtowns.Moreover,thephysicaldemarcationbetweenlandforwildanimals
andhumanbeingsentrenchednotionsoffortressconservation(seeminglyatloggerheads
withsustainableuseapproachprofessedbygamefarmers),whichstresstheincompatibility
ofhumansandwildanimalslivinginharmony.Accordingtothisparadigm,wildanimalsand
humansshouldbekeptapartastominimizehuman-wildlifeconflict.Dangerouswildanimals
weretobecontainedwithingamefences,whicheffectivelydemarcated‘no-goareas’forlocal
communities.Ifafarmerweretofindanunknownblackperson‘trespassing’ontheland,
therewasthedangerofgettingshotonsight(Interviews,2013).Thewaiveroftheresnullius
principleentrenchedbythenewregulationalsostrengthenedtherelationshipbetweenthe
apartheidstateandthewhitefarmingcommunity,oneofitsmainpowerbasesandfurther
contributedtosocialre-orderingandengineeringofruralapartheidSouthAfrica.
Gameranchingderivesincomefromconsumptive(huntingandmeatproduction)andnon-
consumptiveuseofwildlife(eco-tourismandsaleofliveanimalsatauctions).Inthe
aftermathofseveredroughts,theoutbreakofRinderpestandthelinkeddeclineoftheprice
ofmeatinthe1960s,aswellasthechangingpropertyrights,livestockfarmersstartedto
migratetogameranchingor‘mixed’farming.Theculturalsignificanceofhuntingamongst
Afrikaners220furtherassistedtheconversionfromtraditionalfarmingmethodstogame
ranching.Thecommercialtrophyhuntingindustrytookoffinthe1960sashuntersstartedto
paytostalkwildanimals(Scriven/Eloff2003:246).Thenewbrandofgamerancherssoon
realizedtheeconomicvalueofcarryingtrophyanimalsontheirland.High-valuespeciessuch
aselephants,lions,buffalosandleopards(togetherwiththerhino,thesefivespeciesare
220DuToit(2011:11)explainstheculturalsignificanceofhuntingasfollows:“ThecultureoftheBoeristohuntandfromtherearethewell-knownwords,“DieBoerensyRoer”(Thefarmerandhisrifle(sic)).Huntingforfoodcanneverbeclassifiedasasportsincethisconstitutesaculturalactionratherthanasport.”
186
knownbythehuntingmarketingbrand‘BigFive’)canbehuntedacrosssouthernAfrica.221
Huntingofblackandwhiterhinosis,however,onlypermittedwiththerequiredpaperworkin
NamibiaandSouthAfrica(Lindsey/Roulet/Romañach2007:457).Sincethentrophyhunting
hasbecomeamajorincomegeneratorongameranches(seeTable6).222Aftertheendofthe
apartheidregime,theindustryexperiencedamajorgrowthspurt,223whichispartiallylinked
totheliftingoftheeconomicsanctionsbytheinternationalcommunityandthedepreciating
valueoftheSouthAfricancurrencyoverthepastdecade.Moreover,whitefarmersregarded
gamereservesassecureinvestmentsthatmightbesparedfromlandclaims224andlabour
unrest(Interviewswithjournalist1,2013;rhinoowner3,2013).In2013,huntingtourists
spentanestimated1.072billionSouthAfricanRand(approximately80million€)on7638
hunts(ProfessionalHunters'AssociationofSouthAfrica9December2014).Trophyhunting
proponentsassertthattheprofitmarginsoftrophyhuntingoutperformothertypesofwildlife
use(Bothma/Suich/Spenceley2012:154);however,suchclaimshavebeenquestioned(see
forexample:Joubert2015).Whilethehuntingfraternitymakesclaimstobeneficiationof
ruralcommunitieslivingnearhuntingreservesthroughtheprovisionofjobsandmeat
(Interviewwithprofessionalhuntingrepresentative,2013),thereislittleevidenceofequitable
incomedistribution.Inaddition,aswillbediscussedinChapter6,someofthe(mostlyillegal)
huntingprofitsneverreachSouthAfricanshores.Thislackofequitableincomedistributionis
linked,amongstothers,tothelackofwildlifelegislationenforcingcommunityinvolvement,
communalownershipofwildlifeorskillstransferallowingcommunitiestoruntheirown
huntingoperationsornegotiatefairtermswithoperatorsandhuntingoutfits(Lindsey2008:
45).221TrophyhuntingisbannedinBotswanaandSwaziland.222Despitethegrowthandinfluenceoftheanimalrightsmovementandtheanti-huntinglobbyinthenorthernhemisphere,therewaslittledebateabouttheethicsofhuntinginSouthAfricaintheearlyyearsofthegameranchingindustry.Thisshortcomingmaybelinkedtothecountry’spariahstatusandisolationfromtheinternationalcommunitywhiletheapartheidregimewasinpower,aswellastheculturalimportanceattachedtohunting(whichisnotspecifictotheAfrikanerpeopleonly).223ManyinternationaltrophyhunterswereunperturbedbythepoliticsoftheapartheidregimeandhadalreadymovedtheirbusinesssouthonceKenya,theformertophuntingsafaridestinationbannedallhuntingtosaveitswildlifefromextinctionin1977.224Theissueoflandrestitutiontoitsformerowners(whohadbeendisownedduringcolonialandapartheidtimes)isacontestedissueandprovidesforon-goingconflictsinpost-apartheidSouthAfrica.Accordingtointerviewswithwhitefarmers,investingingamereserveswasdeemedpreferableovertraditionalagriculturalventuresbecauselocalpeople“wouldnotwanttofarmorliveamongstwildanimals”.Moreover,wildanimals(themainassetsbeyondthelanditself)couldbemovedorsold(Interviewwithrhinoowner7,2013).
187
Moreover,wherecommunitybeneficiationisaffected,conflictshavearisenoverwhoisin
chargeofequitableincomedistributiontomembersorwhonegotiatesonbehalfofthe
community(seealso:Kahler/Gore2012).Thelocalpoliticaleliteintheformoftraditional
leadersorchiefstendstoactasnegotiatorsbetweenoutsidepartiesandthecommunityin
ruralsouthernAfrica,and“ifyouareonthewrongsideofthechief,thenyouwillseeno
moneyorbenefits”(Focusgroupwithcommunitymembers,2013).
Table6:AnnualincomeoftheSouthAfricanwildlifeindustryin2011
Sector Value(ZAR) Value(€) PercentageRecreationalhuntingindustry 3,100,000,000 283,300,000 66
Translocation(capture) 750,000,000 68,542,600 16
Trophyhuntingindustry 510,000,000 46,609,000 11
Taxidermy 200,000,000 18,278,000 4
Liveanimalsales(auctions) 94,000,000 8,590,670 2
Meatproduction 42,000,000 3,838,390 1
Total 4,696,000,000 429,168,000 100
Source:adaptedfromduToit/vanSchalkwyk(2011:11)
WildlifehadbeenimbuedwithmonetaryvalueorcommodifiedinMarxianterms,andby
1987,theDepartmentofAgriculturalDevelopmentrecognizedgameranchingasafully-
fledgedagriculturalactivity.So-called‘shareblocking’legislation(the1988amendmenttothe
ShareBlockControlActof1980)allowedforthejointacquisitionofagriculturallandforthe
purposesofconvertingitintoprivateconservationareas.Agroupofpeoplecouldbuyblocks
ofsharesinacompanythateffectivelyownedallmovableandimmovableassetsonapieceof
agriculturalland(Hearne/McKenzie2000:427).Thisledtonewopportunitiesforcitydwellers
toowntheirownpieceofland‘outinthebush’andmorebusinesspeoplebecame‘weekend
farmers’.So-called‘chequebookingfarming’involvedwealthyexecutives“shieldingtaxable
incomefrombonusesandshareoptionsbyinvestinginfarms”(Lester2014).Thismovealso
strengthenedtheconservation-businessnexusinasfarasgamefarmsbecameincreasingly
managedasbusinesses.Aswillbeshowninlaterchaptersofthisdissertation,thesmart
partnershipbetweensomeroguewildlifeprofessionalsandbusinessentrepreneursledtothe
establishmentoffrontcompaniesandlegitimatecompanies,throughwhichtrophiescouldbe
188
exportedabroad.Whileconservationobjectiveswereadrawingcardformanygamefarmers,
thebusinessofgamefarminghadtobeprofitabletobesustainableandtointerestpotential
investors.
Thelimitsofthecommonlawpositionthatwildanimalscouldnotbeownedremained
unsatisfactorytoinvestors,especiallysincethewildlifeandhuntingindustrieshadgrown
tremendouslysincethe1970s.Whiterhinos,forexample,weresellingforanaveragepriceof
R34713(about7000GermanMarkatthetime)atgameauctionsin1989.Unlessgame
(rhino)ownershipbecamelegallyprotected,wildanimalsingeneralandrhinosinspecific
posedafinancialliabilitytoowners(SouthAfricanLawCommission1990:5)andthusthe
stateintervenedagain.TheSouthAfricanLawCommissiontackledtheissuein1989.Its
recommendationsledtotheGameTheftAct105of1991(Glazewski2000:428),whichstill
appliestoday.TheobjectiveoftheActistoprotectthelandowner’srightsofownershipof
gamewhenthegameescapesorisluredawayfromthelandowner’s“sufficientlyenclosed”
land(Glazewski2000:ibid).Itisrathercuriousthatthecorollarydoesnotapplytowild
animalsthatcrossfromnationalparkstoprivate,communalorprovincialreservesinSouth
Africa.Uponleavingtheconfinesofnationalparks,wildanimalsreverttothestatusofres
nullius,andnotrespublicae(resourcesownedbythestate)orrescommunis(resources
ownedincommon).Thecategoriesofrespublicae(wildanimalsinUSnationalparksare
categorizedasrespublicae)andrescommunisplacerestrictionsontheruleofcaptureand
reservecertainproprietaryrightstothestateorcommunityratherthantoindividuals
(Wodarski2014).WhileSouthAfricanbiodiversityandconservationlegislationprotects
ownershiprightsoftheprivatecommercialgameranchingindustry,itfailstodealwiththe
acquisition,retentionandlossofwildanimalsthatoccurorescapefrompublicwildlife
conservationareasandnationalparks(Hopkinson/vanStaden/Ridl2008:484).Thisomission
hasledtoheateddebatesamongstopposingcampsinthetrophyhuntingdebate,225
especiallysincesomenationalparkshavedroppedtheirboundaryfenceswithprivately-
ownedgamereservesthatallowtrophyhunting.Wildanimalsderivingfrompublicparks
225Themoralityofsportsortrophyhuntingissubjecttomanynormative,moralandethicaldebates,rangingfromcontestedissuespertainingtothekillingofanimalsforpleasure,trophiesorsport,andextendingthroughtobroaderexistentialdiscussionsonwhetheranimalsassentientbeingsshouldenjoythesameinalienablerightsashumanbeings.
189
mightthusbehuntedforprofitonprivateland(seeBox1).Someconservatorsconsiderthe
state’sdroppingoffencesasanincentiveforprivateoperatorstocarryonwiththeirprivate
conservationendeavours226whilealsoincreasingthetotalsurfaceareaavailableto
conservation(Interviews2013).Therehavebeeninstanceswherehuntingoperatorshave
“removed”gamefencesbetweennationalparksandadjacentgamereservesbythrowing
batteryacidonboundaryfences(Interviewwithconservator13,2013;investigativejournalist
1,2012;investigativejournalist3,2013;ownobservationatboundaryfences).Theacid
speedsupcorrosionallowingbiganimalssuchasrhinosorelephantstobreakthroughthe
fenceandmigratetotheothersideofthegamefence.Therehavealsobeenoccasionswhere
huntingoperatorsluredwildanimals(e.g.lions)fromnationalparksbyhangingbaiton
boundaryfences.Whileprivateownershiprightsofwildanimalsareprotectedonprivate
land,thesameownershipprivilegesdonotaccruetothepublic(state).Trespassingand
huntingareforbiddeninnationalparks;however,thestatehasnorecoursetoclaiming
ownershipoverwildanimalsthathaveescapedfromitsconservationareas.Thestrange
disconnectbetweenthehuntingbaninnationalparksandcommercialtrophyhuntingon
adjacentprivatelandisdiscussedinBox1below.Sufficetomentionherethatthesemuddled
huntingandpropertyrightshaveledtoconfusionandunhappinessamongstlocal
communities.Whereasmembersoftheircommunitiesarebrandedas“poachers”when
huntingonprivateorpublicland,wealthyhuntersareallowedtohuntwildanimalsagainsta
pricetagonprivatelandwheretheprovenanceofsuchwildanimalsisnotclear.
226Wildanimalsarethusconsidereda‘gift’orincentivetocarryonconservingthesame.
190
Box1:Whitehunterversusblackpoacher?TheAssociatedPrivateNatureReserves(APNR)isanassociationofprivatelyownedgamereservesborderingontheKrugerNationalPark.SouthAfrica’snationalparksauthoritySANParksagreedtodropKruger’swesternboundaryfenceswithadjacentprivategamereservesin1993,whichaddsapproximately200000hectaresofconservationareatotheso–calledGreaterKrugerNationalPark.Thedroppedfencesallowforthefreemovementofwildanimalsintheenlargedconservationareawhilealsocreatingabufferzonebetweenthenationalpark,privateconservanciesandsurroundingland.ThehuntingofwildanimalsisnotallowedinnationalparkssuchastheKNPwhereastheinternalconstitutionsofindividualprivategamereservesdeterminewhatformsofsustainableusearepermissibleintheirconservationareas.TheAPNRallowscommercialhuntingwithinitsprotectedarea.Huntingpermitsareallocatedthroughaconsultativeprocess,whichinvolvestheKNPandtheLimpopoDepartmentofEconomicDevelopment,EnvironmentandTourism(LEDET)(AfricaHunting.com2010).DavidMabunda,theformerchiefexecutiveofSANParks,declaredthattheparksauthoritywasnotopposedtohuntinginbufferareasprovided“itisdonetransparentlyandaccordingtothemanagementplanandprotocolsagreedtobetweenadjoininglandownersandSANParks”(KrugerNationalPark2009).Accordingtoanimalrightsactivists(Interviews,2013),theincompatibleanimalusephilosophiesofnationalparksandgamereservesconstituteapotentialconflictofinterestas“naturalheritageissoldforprofittotrophyhunterswithlimitedbenefittothestateorcommunity”.AccordingtoAnimalRightsAfrica(2009:22),“[r]hinoceroseslivingintheKrugerNationalParkaremovingacrossunfencedboundariesonthePark’swesternborderintotheAssociatedPrivateNatureReserves(APNR)andonthePark’s[E]asternborderintoMozambiquewheretheycanbeprivatelysoldtoforeigntrophyhuntersforexorbitantsums.”TwoAPNRmemberswereamongstthefirstprivateoperatorstoobtainwhiterhinosfromtheNatalParksBoardinthe1960sand1970s(Buijs1987:1–2).Unlikemanyotherprivaterecipientsofwhiterhinos(seelaterinthischapter),thesetwooperatorscouldaccountforthefateoftheirwhiterhinos,whichincludedtrophyhuntingofrhinobulls(Buijs1987:29).Whilethereisonlyanecdotalevidencethat‘Kruger’rhinosmayhavebeenhuntedingamereservesadjacenttotheKNP(theirprovenanceisdifficulttoestablishaswhiterhinosacrossSouthAfricaaredescendedfromthesamegeneticpoolinKwaZulu–Natal),trophyhuntingofrhinoscontinuestoconstituteaformofrevenuetosomeAPNRreserves(seeforexample:Borchert27February2013).Thismuddledstateofaffairsraisesquestionsofwhytrophyhuntersshouldbeallowedto(potentially)huntKrugerrhinoslegallywithlimiteddirectbenefitsaccruingtostatecofferswhilerhinopoachingisanon-goingconcernintheKNP.Moreover,thispointstoaveryfinelinebetween‘legal’trophyhuntingand‘illegal’poachingandthepolardichotomyof‘blackpoacher’versus‘whitehunter’(foranexcellentanalysisofthisdichotomyandtheassociatedmasternarrativeseealso:Steinhart2006).Essentially,thelawsanctionstheformerinexchangeformoneywhilethelattercommitsacriminalactandhenceispenalizedbythelaw.Accordingtoaprofessionalhunter(Interviewwithprofessionalhunter1,2013),huntingandpoachingdifferinthreesignificantpoints.Ahunterishighlyskilled,strivestoachieveaone-shotkill(aso-calledheart-lungshot)andthemotivationforthehuntisdifferenttothatofapoacher.AswillbeshowninChapter7,thisdistinctionmaybeacademic;inpractice,thesignificantdifference(asperthosenotedbytheprofessionalhunter)relatestothemotivationofthehunterversusthatofthepoacher.Manyso-calledpoachersareequallyhighly-skilledaimingforaone-shotkillasnotattracttheattentionofrangersandothersecuritypersonnel.Thedistinctionthusrelatestohowthetwoarelegallydefined.
191
4.4.2Large-scaleconversiontogameranchinginthe1990sSomestructuralchangesfurtherinfluencedtheconversionofagriculturallandintogame
ranchesinthe1990s.CommercialfarmershadbeenoneofthesocialbasesoftheNational
Party’srisetopowerin1948.Theapartheidgovernmentrantheagriculturalsectorthrough
controlboardsandcooperatives;commercialfarmersweresupportedthroughsubsidies,
grants,transportconcessions,favourablecreditfacilities,marketingboardsandcheaplabour
(SouthAfricanHistoryOnline2014).227Overthecourseofthe1980s,therewasagradual
weakeningofthepoliticalandeconomicpowerofcommercialfarmerswithinthepolitical
economyofSouthAfrica,climaxingwiththeremovaloftheNationalPartyfrompowerafter
thefirstdemocraticelectionsheldin1994(Greenberg2013:1).
Inthepost-apartheidera,commercialfarmerswerefacedwithmulti–layeredchallenges,
includingamongstothers,thecontinuedderegulationoftheagriculturalsector(inlinewith
theWorldTradeOrganization’s(WTO)policyontradeliberalization);thelossofpolitical
leverage(thefarminglobbyheldaboutone-thirdoftheparliamentaryseatsduringtheheight
oftheapartheidregime);theintroductionofnewlabourlegislationinpost-apartheidSouth
Africa(introducingminimumwagesforfarmworkers);theimpactofHIV/Aidsandmalariaon
theproductivityoffarmlabourers;stocktheft,livestockdiseases,bushencroachmentand
climatechange,aswellaslandclaimsforillegallandappropriationduringthecolonialand
apartheidregimes(Absa2003:1–8;Carruthers2008).Theconversiontogameranchingwas
appealing:notonlyhadthemonetaryvalueofwildanimalsincreaseddramaticallybutgame
ranchingislessdependentonunskilledlabour(Smith/Wilson2002:11)andfavourable
weatherconditionswhileostensiblypursuingtheloftygoalofachievinga‘sustainableliving
planet’throughgrowingwildlifenumbers(Absa2003:8).Moreover,gamerancheswereseen
asaninvestmentsafefromlandclaimsafter1994.Thegovernmenthadundertakento
preservepublicandprivateconservationareasastoensurethatthetotalareaavailablefor
conservationwouldnotdecrease(Interviewwithgamefarmers8&9,2015).
227Theapartheidregimeintroducedadualfarmingsysteminruralareas,commercialfarmingbywhitefarmersandcommunalfarminginAfricanreserves.Agriculturalproductionwassupposedlybasedon“pre-colonialforms”offarminginthereserves,“meanttoperpetuatethemythofthecontinuityofrurallifewhileinrealitydenyingAfricansthemeanstosustainthemselvesofftheland”(SouthAfricanHistoryOnline2014).
192
Theconfluenceoftheseprocesseshasledtohealthygrowthofgamefarmsandreserves:In
theearly1960s,therewereapproximately500,000wildanimalsinthewholeofSouthAfrica
(vanHoven2015:104),includinganestimated840whiterhinos(Collins,Alan/Fraser,
Gavin/Snowball,Jen2013:2).228By2015,therewere11600registeredgamefarmsinSouth
Africaholdingsome21millionhectaresofland(vanHoven2015:101)andbetween16to20
millionwildanimals(Reilly2014).Meanwhile,thetotalsizeofprivaterhinoreservesinSouth
Africastretchesoveranareaofabouttwomillionhectaresincorporatingabout380separate
properties,similarinsizetotheKrugerNationalPark(KNP).ByDecember2014,27%(or
about5000animals)ofthenationalpopulationofwhiterhinosand20%(or450animals)of
blackrhinoswereprotectedonprivatelandinSouthAfrica.
Beyondtheneedfortheprovisionofsupportservicesandgoods(suchasgame-prooffencing,
off-streetvehiclesandranchinginfrastructure),wildliferanchingledtothecreationofnew
semi-skilledandskilledjobcategoriessuchaswildlifeveterinarians,gamemanagersand
consultants,andtothegrowthofthetaxidermy,gamecaptureandtranslocationindustries,
aswellassupplementaryfeedmanufacturersandsuppliers(duToit/vanSchalkwyk2011;van
Hoven2015:102).Theclaimthatthewildliferanchingemploysthreetimesmorestaffthan
livestockfarms(Dry2011;Langholz/Kerley2006)deservescriticalexamination.Whilesome
gamereservesandfarmscontinuedtoemployfarmworkersandtheirextendedfamilies(who
hadbeenliving,workingandfarmingontheland),theservicesoftrackers,guides,drivers,
cleaningandcateringstaffwereneededongamefarms(Hearne/McKenzie2000:426).
Insteadofre-skillingorprovidingtrainingcoursestoresidentfarmworkers,labourwasoften
soughtinnearbycitiesandtown(Helliker2013:17).Theconversionoffarmlandtogame
ranchesthusaffectedhundredsofblackfarmworkersanddwellers,229whoseserviceswere
nolongerrequiredongameranches.Similartowhatplayedoutuponthepromulgationof
nationalparksandgamereserves,manyblackfarmworkerswereeitherpaidoff,retrenched
228Thereareconflictingnumberestimates.Wildlifecountswerelessreliableintheabsenceofmoderncensustechnologiesnowavailabletowildlifeprofessionals.ThechoicewasmadetogowiththenumberssuppliedbytheNatalParksBoardandDrIanPlayer,whowereworkingintimatelywithrhinosatthetime.229ThedisplacementofblackfarmerswaspartofthecolonialprojectinSouthAfrica.Aswhitesettlersappropriatedland,huttaxeswereimposed,andeconomicpressureincreased,manypeoplelivingonfarmsbecamefarmworkers,ortheyenteredintocontractualarrangementswithwhitefarmerstoretainaccesstoland(Hall2003:2).
193
and/or(andcontinuetobe)evictedfromprivatelyownedgameranchesandreserves.230
Thesepracticeswereparticularlypronouncedbeforetheendofapartheidwhenfarmworkers
enjoyednolegalprotectionfromtheiremployers.Withtheadventofdemocracyandtheend
ofwhiteminorityrule,thefortunesoffarmworkershavechangedonpaperbutfewknow
theirrightsandcontinuetobevulnerabletoevictionandexploitativelabourconditions
(Berger2011;HumanRightsWatch2011).Beyondthesettingupphase,gameranchesareless
‘hard’labour-intensive(Smith/Wilson2002:11)andfarmworkersanddwellers,andtheir
livestockwereexpelledordeniedaccessundertheguiseof“people,livestockandwildlifeare
alethalcombination”(Interviewswithgameranchersandconvictedpoachers,2013).Lester
(2014)putsthisfurtherintoperspectivebyreferringtothelargepercentageofforeign
ownershipofgamereserves:
“GamefarmingusedtobelargelyconfinedtotheLowveldandnorthernpartsofRSA.ThenwegottothenewSouthAfricaandwecameupwiththewonderfulideathatgamefarmsbringtourists,foreigncurrency,jobsandawholelotmoretothenewRSA.And,yes,someoperatorshavemadeahugecontribution.Butlet’sbehonest,manygamefarmsarepayinglipservicetothetruemeaningofsustainabledevelopment.AnyolddunnywithforeigncurrencycanswanintoRSAandbuyupwhatwasafarmingconcern,selloffthelivestock,payofftheworkersandturnthelandintoapersonalprivatezoo.ThenfindaniceAfricannameandcallita‘conservatory’.”
ThetoleranceoftheSouthAfricanstateforabsenteeandforeignlandownershipfurther
exacerbatesthe‘landquestion’,231andtheraciallyskewedlandownershippatterns.There
230InastudyundertakenonbehalfoftheWildernessFoundation(aprivatefoundationstartedbythelateDrIanPlayer),theauthorsfound“noevidenceoffarmworkersbeinglaidoffintheestablishmentofthePGRs”(Langholz/Kerley2006:10).Theworkerseitherfoundemploymentwiththeprivategamereserve(PGR)ormovedwiththeiroriginalemployers.Approximately52%oftheoriginalfarmworkershadremainedintheemploymentofthePGR.LangholzandKerley’ssurveydataderivedfromcompletedquestionnairesprovidedbytenofthirteenIndalo(EasternCapeAssociationofPrivateGameReserves)membersin2006.Thestudyalsofoundthattheaverageannualsalaryoffulltimeemployeeshadincreased4.8fold,whichisattributedtothehighsalariespaidtoseniorstaff.Interestingly,areportbyalocalNGOprovidesdatathatcontradictsthestudy,documentingevictionsandcaseswherethefarmworkers’socio-economicrightswereerodedbynotallowingthemtokeeplivestock,growvegetables,ordeniedthemaccesstotheland(Naidoo2005:28–30).Thereisscantempiricalevidenceonthefortunesoffarmworkersinprivategamereservesfromothersources.Advocacycampaignsandreportsbyunionsandothershavealsobeenlesspositiveintheirappraisal(Lester2014;Wisborgetal.2013;ParliamentaryMonitoringGroup2011).Sentimentsofdissentandunhappinesswerealsoechoedininterviewsandfocusgroupsundertakenwithruralcommunitiesandconvictedpoachers(someofwhomhadbeenfarmworkersortheirnext-of-kinwere).231The‘landissue’ofresolvingthedispossessionandexpropriationofblack-ownedlandduringthecolonialandapartheidregimesremainsoneofthemostimportantissueswithinthepublicandpoliticaldiscourseinSouthAfrica.
194
hasbeensubstantialforeigninvestmentinsomereserves–suchasRichardBranson’sprivate
lodgeinthewesternSabiSandsgamereserve(heisoneofmanyinternationalinvestorsof
thegamereserveadjacenttotheKNP)or‘DubaiWorld’,theinvestmentarmoftheUnited
ArabEmirates’governmentthatacquiredmajoritysharesintheShamwariGameReservein
theEasternCape(Helliker2013:16).Moreover,thecreationofamalgamatedandcorporate-
ownedgamereserveshaschangedthelandstructuretowardslargertractsofland,which
contradictstheSouthAfricangovernment’slandreformpolicyofpromotingsmallerfarming
units(Wisborgetal.2013:59–60).
Thereisagrowingriftbetweenthestate(whoeffectivelyallowedprivateownershipof
wildlifeforthepurposesofwildlifeconservation)andmembersofthegameranching
fraternitywhohavebranchedoutinto‘lessconservation-orientatedendeavours’.Thisnew
schoolofgameranchershasintroducedexotic(non-indigenous)species,suchasfallowdeer
fromwesternEurasia,Russianwildboar,roanantelopefromWestAfricaandsableantelope
fromZambia.Therealsohasbeenafocusonbreedingtrophyspecimensandthebirthofan
entireindustrybasedonphenotypiccolourvariationswithinaspecies.Thesepractices
concernconservatorsastheselectionofcertaintraitsdepartsfromthenotionofnatural
selectionandfree-rangingwildpopulations(Reilly2014).Theobjectiveofphenotypic
breedingisthediversificationandexpansionofavailabletrophyanimals(Interviewwith
wildlifevet2andfarmmanager1,2013).Thepromulgationoftheearliermentioned
ThreatenedorProtectedSpecies(TOPS)regulations(discussedinChapter5andbelow)were
partiallytriggeredbytheinjudiciousmovementandintroductionofnon-indigenouswild
animals–whichisalsorelevanttotherhinoissueastheTOPSregulationsstipulatethatthe
rhinoshouldnotbemovedtoareasthatfalloutsideitshistoricalrange.
Essentially,theprocessesdescribedaboveledtothesocialre-orderingofruralSouthAfrica,
imbuedwildlifewitheconomicvalue,encouragedtheprivatizationofandthebuy-inof
corporationsinto‘conservation’initiatives,furtheralienatinglocalcommunitiesfromlandand
wildlifeandprovidingtheidealconditionsforpoachingtoflourish(suchasimpoverishment;
lossofagency,landandhuntingrights;unhappinesswiththerules).Italsoledtothe
interdependenceofstateandprivateconservationinitiativesandlaidthegroundworkforthe
lucrativewildlifeindustry.Theprivilegedpositionofobtaininghighlysubsidizedwildlifefrom
195
thestate,assuranceofprivateownershipofthesameandthepoliticalleverageofthefarming
communityduringapartheidledtosomewildliferanchersfeelingunderappreciatedinthe
newdispensation(Interviews,2013).Theincreasedregulationoftheprivatesector(suchas
theTOPSregulations)andtheperceivedthreatofdispossessionoflandandwildlifehaveled
togrowingresentmentamongstwildlifefarmersandlandowners.Insomeinstances,these
feelingsofresentmentandtheperceivedunfairnessoftheruleshaveprovidedfodderto
bendtherules,exploitlegalloopholesorengageinillegalactivities(whichwillbediscussedin
Chapter6).Inpost-apartheidSouthAfrica,thehuntingandwildlifeindustriesarealmost
exclusivelymadeupofahomogenousgroupofwhiteeconomicelites.Attemptstoobtain
statisticsontheleveloftransformationwithinthewildlifeandhuntingsectorswere
unsuccessfulfromimportantgatekeepers(e.g.howmanyblackprofessionalhuntersare
there?Howmanyblack-ownedrhinofarmsandreservesarethere?).Awell-knownexception
isSouthAfrica’scurrentdeputy-presidentCyrilRamaphosawhoisafamouswildlifebreeder
andwhocameinforcritiqueafterhebidona$2millionbuffaloduringawildlifeauction
(Findlay[SAPA-AP]2014).
4.4.3PrivatizationoftherhinoWhiletheprivatizationofrhinoshasbeenportrayedasanunqualifiedconservationsuccess
story(‘tSas-Rolfes2012;Bothma/Suich/Spenceley2012),thedarkersideisoftendisregarded.
Byvirtueoftheapartheidracelaws,blackpeoplewerelegallyexcludedfromowninglandand
wildanimalsuntiltheendofthecolonialapartheidregimein1994.Theprivatizationof
wildlifeinclusiveofrhinoscontributedtoanevengreaterdistancebetweenlocalpeople,wild
animalsandconservationendeavours.Beyondthesystematicexclusionofblackpeople,rhino
conservationonprivatelandwasfraughtwithnotionsofprivilegeandentitlementbyrhino
breedersandconservators.Theprivatelandowners’needtogenerateprofitstorungame
farmsandreservesprovidedthepointofentryforillegaleconomicaction,theexploitationof
legislativeandregulatoryloopholes.Thiscriticalassessmentconstitutesadeparturefromthe
grandnarrativeoftheuncriticalrhinoconservationsuccessstoryinSouthAfricaandisfurther
unpackedinthefollowingsection.
196
Therhinoindeedtakescentrestageintheprivatizationandcommodificationofwildlifein
SouthAfrica,enrichinglandownersandfarmerswithlittlebenefittolocal,ruralcommunities.
ThenumberofwhiterhinosintheHluhluwe-iMfoloziParkinKwaZulu-Natalhadbeenreduced
toabout50to70animalsintheearly20thcentury(InterviewwithIanPlayerbyJeffBarbee,
2013)andhadgonelocallyextinctelsewhereinSouthAfrica.Throughsuccessfulbreedingand
conservationprogrammeswithinthepark,whiterhinonumbershadincreasedbythe1960s.
Infact,rhinonumbersstartedexceedingthecarryingcapacityofthepark,andtherewere
fearsthatanoutbreakofdiseasecouldrevoketherecoveryofthewhiterhino.Itwasatthis
pointthattheNatalParksBoard232commenced“OperationRhino”,whichoverthecourseof
the1960sandearly1970ssawmorethan1,200whiterhinosrelocatedfromtheiMfolozi
GameReservetotheKNP,privategamereserves,aswellaszoosandsafariparksabroad.
Newimmobilizationandtranslocationmethodsgreatlyassistedthisproject(Emslieetal.
2009:22).TheNatalParksBoardhadenvisagedthattheprovisionofwhiterhinosatlowcost
toprivatelandownerswouldrenderthemeffectivecustodiansofrhinos.Thefirstwhite
rhinoswerethussoldtoprivatelandownersathighlysubsidizedpricesandpossiblybelow
marketvaluein1963.Themarketvaluewasunknownatthispointastherhinohadnotbeen
economicallyvaluedinSouthAfrica(unlikeinconsumermarketsintheArabpeninsulaand
Asia).AformerofficialofthethenNatalParksBoardpointedoutthatthestatehadto
persuadesomegamefarmerstotakeonrhinosastheywerebynomeanscovetedwild
animalsinthelate1960sand1970s(Interviewwithconservator10,2013).Theformerparks
officialrecountedthestoryoftryingtosellrhinostoanunwillingbuyer(Interviewwith
conservator10,2013):
“Isaidtohim:‘Lookwe’vegotasurplusofwhiterhinoandit’squiteembarrassingbecausetheyareexceedingthecarryingcapacityandwe’vebeenwarnedthatcertainimpoverishmentoftheecologywouldtakeplaceunlesswemovedthem.’Sothethoughtofcullingtherhinossosoonafterwe’dsavedthemwasn’tverypalatable.Hesaid:‘Well,lookthere’snothingIcandowiththerhino.Ifyouaskme,I’mnotinterestedinone.’ThenIsaid:‘LookwetakeoverR200eachtodeliverit.’Andhesaid:‘I’msorryI’llhavetoputupfences.’Andwesaid:‘Youknowtheyaresobigandwieldy.’Tothathesays:‘Oncetheybreakthroughthefence,theycancauseenormoustroubleformyneighbours.’…”
232TheformerprovinceofNatalisknownasKwaZulu-Natalsincetheendofapartheid,anditsparksauthorityisEzemveloKZNWildlife,theformerNatalParksBoard.
197
Accordingtorhinoowners(Interviews,2013),thestart-upcostsofestablishingagame
reservewithbiganimalslikerhinos,elephants,hipposorbuffaloeswerehigherthanstandard
gamereservesduetothehighercostattachedtoprocurement,translocationand
managementofbiganimals.Thereluctanceoflaw-abidinggamefarmerstokeeprhinosinthe
1970swasalsolinkedtotheblanketbanonthetradeofliverhinosandtheirproducts
imposedbyCITESin1977,showcasinghowthetreatywascounterproductivetoconservation
initiativesintheearlyyears.Asaconsequenceofthetradeban,rhinotrophiescouldnotbe
exportedtointernationaldestinations.Whiletherewasagrowinglocalhuntingindustry(e.g.
culturalhuntingoftheAfrikaners),localhunterspreferredtohuntforfoodorasan
expressionofculturalvalues(duToit/vanSchalkwyk2011).SouthAfricaallowedtheexport
ofhuntingtrophiesofwhiterhinosfrom1979onwardsagain.Asaresultofthehighcost
attachedtokeepingrhinosandlowreturnsoninvestments(initially),rhinoranchingbecame
largelyaneconomicactivityforthewealthyeliteorforrancherswhocouldgainthe
confidenceofforeignandlocalinvestorsortrophyhunters.Oncetheprofitabilityoftherhino
asatrophyanimalbecameknown,theNatalParksBoardstruggledtomeetthedemandfor
rhinos(Interviewwithconservator10,2013)andawaitinglisthadtobeinstituted.Despite
triplingthelistpriceforrhinos,thedemandforrhinosoutstrippedthesupply.Followinginthe
footstepsofaprivateindividualwhoauctionedoffhisrhinos,theNatalParksBoardheldits
firstauctionin1986.Thesixrhinosonauctionachievedmorethandoublethelistprice.In
lightofthesuccessandinresponsetotheBuijsreport(discussedbelow),parksauthorities
startedtobacktheauctionsystem(‘tSas-Rolfes2011:4).
Bythemid-1980s,theNatalParksBoardgrewconcernedoverthelackofgrowthofrhino
numbersonprivateland,andthiseventuallyledtoaninvestigationbyDaanBuijsin1987.The
so-calledBuijsreporttracedandrecordedthehistoriesofalltranslocationsofwhiterhinos
fromNatalGameReserves,BophuthatswanaParks233andprivatesales.Ofthe1,291white
rhinostranslocatedtoprivatelandbetween1961and1987,therewasanunexplainedlossof
510whiterhinosonprivateland.Whilethereweredeathsduringandaftertranslocation,the
annualgrowthrateshouldhavebeenaround6%.Buijs(1987:2)remarked:
233BophuthatswanawasahomelandinthenorthwesternregionofSouthAfricaduringtheapartheidregime.
198
“Thisdatashowsanunexpecteddecreaseof510rhinosandthelossofallrhinoon45ranches(includesunknowndestinies)towhichrhinohavebeendelivered.Thefateoftherhinoof21oftheranchescouldnotbeestablishedandoftheother24alltherhinoswereshot,lostorsold(notalwaysknowntowhom).”
Whilesomefounderpopulationsweredeemedtoosmallforbreedingpurposes,thehabitat
unsuitableforrhinosurvivalorsingleadultmalepopulationsleadingtonoorlittle
procreation,Buijs’reportpointstotheeconomicvaluationoftherhinoasatrophyanimalas
acauseforconcern(Buijs1987:10–11).As‘tSas-Rolfes(2011:3)explains:
“In1982,theNatalParksBoardlistpriceforalivewhiterhinowas1,000SouthAfricanRand(R).Thatsameyear,theaveragetrophypricewasR6,000.Anyprivatelandownerreceivingaliverhinohadaverystrongincentivetosellitasatrophyasquicklyaspossibletopocketa600percentprofit.Thealternativewasallowingittoroamonhispropertywheretherewasariskoflosingittoapoacherorneighbour.”
ThevalueofawhiterhinotrophyhadsurgedtoR35,000(about17000GermanMark)while
thestatecarriedonsellingliverhinosathighlysubsidizedpriceswhenBuijswasconducting
hisresearchin1987.DuetothesteadydeclineoftheSouthAfricanRandandtheadvantages
ofobtainingforeigncurrency,thevalueoftherhinotrophywasfurtherenhanced(Buijs1987:
11).Moreover,trophyhuntingofrhinoselsewhereinsouthernAfricawasaffectedbyintra-
andinterstateconflictsanddiminishednumbersofrhinosavailablefortrophyhuntingdueto
widespreadillegalhunting.ForeigntrophyhunterswereincreasinglydrawntoSouthAfrica.A
drawingcardappearstohavebeenthewell-knownhospitalityofSouthAfricans,whichseems
tohaveextendedtoobligingtrophyhuntersbyallowing‘unconventional’huntingsafaristo
takeplace.234Insomeinstances,rhinoownersfloutedbasicprinciplesofethicalhunting,such
asthetacit‘gentlemen’sagreement’ofnothuntingbreedingrhinocows,rhinocowsandtheir
calvesoryoungbulls(Buijs1987:8–12).Otherssimplyboughttherhinofromthestateand
hadtrophyhuntersshootitsoonthereafter.Thispracticecontinuesintothepresentandis
knownas‘putandtake’:“…buyrhino,killit,replaceit,killit…”(Interviewwithprovincial
governmentofficial1,2013),discussedfurtherinChapter6.
234Buijs(1987:8)describesonesuchincidentwhereanAmericantrophyhuntershotarhinocow,andhissonshothercalf.
199
Buijs(1987:14–31)providesadetailedbreakdownofrecipientsofpublicrhinosbyname,the
locationofthereservesorfarmsandthereasonsgivenforthelackofgrowthofrhino
populations.Itiscuriousthatsomeofthesamefamilynamesandgamereservesarelinkedto
irregularorillegalhuntingoperationsclosetothirtyyearslater.Whatalsostandsoutinthe
Buijsreportisthesenseofentitlementexpressedbysomerhinoowners,asentimentthat
cameupduringinterviewsconductedwithwildlifeprofessionalsin2013.SaysBuijs(Buijs
1987:11):
“Manylandownershaveallowedalltheiradultmalestobeshotbytrophyhunters,andinmanyinstanceshavealsoprovidedbreedingfemalesforhunting.ThishasbeeninmanycasesjustifiedbytheviewthattheywouldbeallocatedmorerhinobytheNatalParksBoard.Insomeinstances,safarioperatorsinNatalmaintaineditwastheProvince’sobligationthattheyshouldbeprovidedwithmorerhinoforhunting.”
AsaresultoftheBuijsreport,theNatalParksBoardreviseditsallocationpoliciesandstarted
sellingitsrhinosatmarket-relatedpricesfrom1989onwards(Emslie/Brooks1999:18).
Conservationeconomist‘tSas-Rolfes(2011:4)arguesthatwiththeintroductionofthe
auctionsystem,thepricingforliverhinosapproachedrealisticmarketvalues.TheBoard’s
auctionachievedanaveragepriceofZAR49,000perrhinoin1989,atenfoldincreaseofthe
listpriceof1986.Meanwhile,trophyhunterswerewillingtopartwithbetweenZAR80,000
tomorethanZAR90,000perrhinotrophyinthelate80sandearly90s(‘tSas-Rolfes2011:4).
Whiletherewereincentivestobreedrhinosinlightofthemassivepriceincreaseoflive
rhinos,thereturnoninvestmentstoavailrhinosfortrophyhuntingremainedequally
appealing.
Animalrightsgrouppickedupontheissueofthe“missingrhinos”tocampaignforahunting
andtradebantobeimposeduponSouthAfricaatCITESCoPmeetingsinthe1990s(Buijs
1998:4).However,subsequentsurveysandassessments(Adcock/Emslie1994;Emslie/Brooks
1999;Buijs/Anderson1989;Buijs1987;Buijs1998;Buijs/Papenfus1996;Buijs2002;
Castley/Hall–Martin2003;Hall–Martinetal.2008;Emslie2008)revealedrealisticgrowth
patternsofrhinopopulationsandfurtherregulatoryrestrictionswerethwarted;infact,the
whiterhinowasdown-listedtoAppendixIIofCITESin1994,whichallowedtrophyhunting
andthesaleofliveanimals(Leader-Williamsetal.2005:4).The1994decisionserved
conservationinitiativesonprivateland,allowingwealthylandownersandhunterstoderive
200
benefitfromrhinos.Meanwhile,localcommunitiesremainedmarginalizedandexcludedfrom
directbeneficiation.
Scientistshavecalculatedanannualrhinopopulationgrowthrateof6,9%forprivateand
state-ownedrhinosinSouthAfricabetween1991and2010(Emslie/Milliken/Talukdar2013:
4).Theaveragepopulationgrowthrateofrhinosincaptivebreedingorintensivefarming
operationsislowerthanthatofrhinoskeptinthe‘wild’;andhence,agrowthrateof5%to
6%wasdeemedasrealisticonprivateland(Interviewswithconservatorsandrhinoscientist
9,2013).Moreover,theannualhuntingratesofapproximately10,5%onprivatelandbefore
1988decreasedrapidly.By1994,theratehaddroppedto3%(Adcock/Emslie1994:1).
4.4.4Thesaleofliverhinosasafundraisingstrategyfornationalparks
ThesurveysconductedbyBuijsandothersareusefultoolstohighlightsomeofthestrengths
andweaknessesofrhinoconservationonprivateland.Aftertheunsubsidizedvaluationof
rhinosatpublicauctions,therhino(andotherwildanimals)becamemajorsourcesofincome
forparksauthorities.Nationalandprovincialparksauthoritieshavebeendealingwith
decreasingbudgetallocationsfromthenationalgovernment(Interviewswithparksofficials
2013),diminishedorinsufficientrevenuestreamsfromothersourcesofincomeincluding
tourismrevenues,subscriptionsandforeigndonations(Jamesetal,2000quotedinKrug
2001:10),aswellasotherformsofsustainableuse(Interviewswithgovernmentofficialsand
conservators,2013).235
Fromthemid-90s,rhinobreedingintensifiedandrhinopopulationsgrewbothonprivateand
publicland.Parkmanagershadintroduced351whiterhinostotheKrugerNationalPark
(KNP),SouthAfrica’slargestconservationareabetween1960and1972.TheKNPrapidly
becametheworld’sleadingconservatorofwhiterhinosandfromthemid-1980sonwards,
Krugerrhinosweredonatedtootherconservationareasandzoologicalgardens.Asofthelate
235ThemanagementauthorityoftheKNPhad‘surplus’wildanimalsincludingelephants,buffaloesandhipposculled,slaughteredandprocessedintotinnedfoodatanabattoirnearSkukuzabetweenthe1960sand1990s.Theabattoirwaslatercloseddownduetosuccessfulcampaigningbyanimalwelfareorganizations.
201
1990s,“alargefraction”ofwhiterhinosweresoldtogenerateconservationrevenue
(Ferreira/Botha/Emmet2012:5).Scientistsdeterminethe“takeoff”or“management
removals”ofrhinosperannum(Ferreira2013b:3).Thefigureislinkedtoanumberof
variablessuchasgender,age,socialbehaviourandbreedingsuccessofindividualanimals
(InterviewwithKNPofficial,2013).Thesaleofliveanimalstoprivateoperatorsandoverseas
destinationsisbutoneofthestrategiesemployedtomakestate-runparksprofitable,andis
justifiedintermsofthepursuitof“puristbiodiversityconservationobjectives”,wherebythe
rhinoisreintroducedtoitshistoricalrangesonprivateland(Ferreira2013b:3).Followingthe
adventofdemocracyin1994,theformernationalparksboardmorphedintothepara-statal
SouthAfricanNationalParks(SANParks)andactivelysoughtprivate-publicpartnerships236in
lightoftheaugmentedfinancingrequirementsforthegrowingnumbersofnationalparks,
state-rungameandnaturereservesandassociatedcostconsiderationssuchascommunity
resettlementandbeneficiation.Whiletheprivatizationprogrammewasaimedatgenerating
supplementaryfinancingandfillingthegapsofshortfallsinpublicconservationspending,the
parksauthoritynonethelesscontinuedtosellwildanimalsasafundraisingstrategy–initially,
thesefundswereusedtofundlandacquisitiontoextendparks(Ramutsindela2006:86).237
Accordingtotheofficialnarrative,thesaleofliverhinoshasbeenusedtofundanti-poaching
operationssincerhinopoachingescalatedinpublicparks(InterviewwithKNPofficial,2013).
However,thesefundsarenotring-fencedforrhinoprotectiononly.Inresponsetoa
parliamentaryquestion,theMinisterofEnvironmentalAffairs,EdnaMolewaexplainedthat
theincomegeneratedfromthesaleofanimalsaccumulatesinaspecialfundcalledthe‘Park
DevelopmentFund’.SANParksusesthefundfor“acquisitionoflandforinclusionintonational
236TheprivatizationdriveofconservationareasinSouthAfricafallsundertheambitofthepost–apartheidneoliberalmacroeconomicpolicyentitledGrowth,EmploymentandRedistribution(GEAR),whichisgearedtowardstheprivatizationofstateassets(Ramutsindela2006:90).Banks,telecommunicationscompanies,Americanfoundationsandinternationalandnationalcharitableorganizations,forexample,areinvolvedinpublic-privatepartnershipswithSANParks.TheSANParksrestructuringandprivatizationprogrammeinKrugerNationalParkisknownas‘OperationPrevail’–aratherinterestingchoiceofnameconsideringthehistoryofthepark.Privateoperatorshavebeengranted20-yearconcessioncontractstoupgradeexistinglodgesordevelopnewones(Meskell2012:180).237SeveralinterviewpartnerssharedthattherevenueofrhinosaleswasusedtobalanceSANParks’overdraftfacilitiesandtofinancebonusesofseniorstaff.SANParksofficialswerenotatlibertytocommentonthis;however,thenationalparksauthorityattemptedtouseagaggingordertoplugapossibleleakaboutbonusesawardedtoitsfundraisingmanager.InvestigativejournalistsfoundthattheSANParksemployeetaskedwithraisingmoneyagainstrhinopoachinghadreceivedheftybonuspaymentsinadditiontohisbasicmonthlysalary(LegalBrief2014).
202
parks,researchprojectsinthebiophysicalandsocialsciencesrelevanttonationalparks,
scientificreportsandcommunitybeneficiationprojects”(Molewa2014).Parliamentary
representativesofthemainoppositionpartyintheSouthAfricanNationalAssembly,the
DemocraticAlliance(DA)alsorequestedinformationregardingthenumberofwhiteandblack
rhinossoldandtherespectivebuyerssince2007.WhiletheformerMinisterofWaterand
EnvironmentalAffairs(Sonjica2010)providedadetailedlistofrhinobuyers(manyofwhom
wereimplicatedinillegalhunting)in2010,theresponsein2014wasthinonthedetails
stating“namescannotbepublishedduetoexposureandsecurityrisks”(Molewa2014).
NogenderdifferentiationismadeintheaveragepricescitedinTable7;however,rhinocows
aremoreexpensivethanrhinobulls.Twocharacteristicsspecifictorhinocowsexplainthe
pricedifferentials:thehornsoffemalerhinostendtobelongerthanthoseofmales(they
fightless),andthebuyermay“buytwoforthepriceofone”–so-calledcow-calf
combinations–shouldtherhinocowbepregnantorhaveayoungcalf(Interviewwith
SANParksofficial,2013).
Table7:SANParks'rhinosales,2007–2014238
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011–2014
Whiterhinos 87 91 252 138
Blackrhinos 0 0 0 0
Speciesundisclosed 354239
Averagepriceperrhino/ZAR 176969 252341 207660 207080 228984
Averagepriceperrhino/€ 18355 20978 17816 21369 19172
TotalincomeinZAR240 15396280 22963000 52330300 28577071 81060538
Totalincomein€241 1597124 1908305 4489578 2948948 6787009
Source:Extractedfromresponsestoparliamentaryquestions(Sonjica2010;Molewa2014)
238ThepricingexcludesValueAddedTax(VAT).239InresponsetoaparliamentaryquestionbyDArepresentativeGarethMorgan,MinisterMolewastatedthat108rhinoswereallocatedforpotentialsalesin2011(Molewa2011).SANParks’annualreportsfor2011to2014providenofurtherdetailsonrhinosales;however,theoverallincomefromwildlifesalesislisted(comparewithTable8).240Numbershavebeenroundedupordowntothenextdecimal.241TheaverageannualRand/Euroexchangewasused.
203
Whileverifyingthedata,itwasnotedthattherhinosalesnumbersfor2007and2008didnot
synchronizewithdatacollectedfromthe2008surveyofwhiterhinosonprivatelandinSouth
Africa.242Whilethenumberdifferentialsappearcosmeticandcouldbeattributedtoeither
partyattachinganumberofrhinostothewrongyear,itpointstothelargerproblemof
accessingcredibledata.Conflictingdataonrhinosales,poachingincidentsandrhinocensus
numbershavebecomeacontentiousissueincurrentdebatesonrhinoconservationand
scupperattemptstoderivecrediblerhinocontingencyplans.243
Thetablealsofailstodisclosethetotalnumberofbuyers(thenumberandnamesofbuyers
wereonlysuppliedin2010),244whichisrelevantifconservationobjectivesweretoreign
supremeinmakingsalesdecisions.Whilesomeinterviewpartnersclaimedthattheprivate
sectorwasnolongerinterestedinbuyingrhinosduetotherisingcostsofsecuringthem,and
theriskofpoaching,thedatasuggestsotherwise.Moreover,theaveragepriceperrhinohas
remainedatconstantlevelsatgovernmentauctions(thereisaconsiderablepricevarianceat
privateauctions,discussedbelow).AccordingtoeconomistFlippieCloete(citedbyStoddard6
October2014),theaveragepriceofrhinossoldonauctionincreasedbyamere54%between
1991and2013,whereasCapebuffalopricesleaptnearlyfive-foldoverthesameperiod.It
242Theauthorsofthereportstatedthat81insteadof87whiterhinosweresoldin2007,and96insteadofthe91soldin2008(Hall–Martinetal.2008:12).243Throughouttheprocessofdatacollection,Iwaspresentedwithconflictingdatasets,cherry-pickeddataandone-sidednarratives.Ichosetopointouttheconflictingdatainthisinstance,asitdemonstratesthedifficulttaskofsortingthroughverifiableandcredibledata.Inthiscase,itisthestatementoftheMinisterbackedbyprotecteddata–usuallyonlyavailabletoselectedstatebureaucrats–againstdataprovidedtoscientistswhoundertookthesurveyfortheWWF-AfricanRhinoProgramme.244The2010saleof98whiterhinostoJohnHume,theownerofthebiggestprivatelyownedherdofrhinos,ledtoconcernsamongstsomeconservatorswhetheritwasperhapssafertospreadtheriskofpoachinganddiseaseamongstagreaternumberofprivateindividualsthanaselectfew(Sonjica2010,Interviews,2013).In2008,SANParkssuspendedthesaleof200rhinostotherhinofarmeraftertenof72rhinostranslocatedtohisfarmingoperationintheNorthwestProvincehaddied(Momberg2009).TheSANParks’habitatassessmentdeemedthefarmintheNorthwesternProvinceasunsuitablehabitat,andthetranslocationhadhappened“thewrongtimeofyear”.ThedealwasamendedafterHumeagreedtotranslocatetherhinostohisformerreserveneartheKNP.ThegamereserveMauricedalehadbeenputonthemarketatthetimeoffieldworkin2013.Bythen,HumehadtranslocatedthemajorityofhisherdofrhinostohiscaptivebreedingfacilityintheNorthwestProvince.In2014,Hume’sherdofmorethan1000rhinoswasaffectedbyanoutbreakofthebacterialdiseaseHistotoxicClostridialtoxaemiaattheNorthwestfarm.About30rhinosdiedduringtheoutbreak,whichwasattributedtoabove-averagerainfallfollowingaperiodofdrought.SeveralotherrhinofatalitieslinkedtothebacterialdiseasewerelaterreportedfromotherregionsofSouthAfrica.TherhinobreederfinancedresearchanddevelopmentofaClostridialvaccineforrhinos(GameWarden2014),whichhasbeenmadeavailabletofellowrhinobreedersinSouthAfricaandabroad(personalcommunicationwithDrMichelleOtto,2016).
204
appearsbizarrethatthesaletrendsofliverhinoswouldnotfollowthesametrajectoryas
thoseoftheCapebuffaloandotherwildanimals.Arhinoowner’sreturnoninvestmentpales
incomparisonunlesssheofferstrophyhuntsinlieuofthesaleofliveanimals.Thus,the
breedingofwildrhinosandtheirsaleremainslargelyafunctionofthestate;however,the
supplyofnewanimalstotheprivatesectorisunderthreatbecausetheillegalhuntingof
rhinosonpubliclandhasreducedthetotalnumberofrhinoavailablefordonationsandsale
(Interviews,2013and2014).Theinterdependentrelationshipbetweentrophyhunting(legal
sector)andpoaching(illegalflows)isnoticeableinthisinstance.
Despitethethreat,thesaleofrhinosremainsamajorsourceofincomeforSANParks.More
thanhalfoftheparkauthority’srevenuefromthesaleofwildanimals(seeTable8)emanated
fromthesaleofrhinosinspiteofthe“escalatingrhinopoachingcrisis”(Interviewwithparks
official,2013).EzemveloKZNWildlife,theparksauthorityresponsibleformanagingprotected
areasintheprovinceofKwaZulu-Natal,alsoliststhesaleofwhiterhinoasitsbiggest
contributoratliveandcataloguegameauctions,accountingfor74.9%oftotalturnoverfrom
2008toJuly2011(Friedmannetal.2011:2).In2013,fortywhiterhinosweresoldforcloseto
10millionRandatEzemvelo’sannualgameauctioninDurban(Mngoma16May2013).One
yearlater,26whiterhinosweresoldfor11millionRandatthe2014gameauctionin
KwaZulu-Natal.Onebuyerpartedwitharecordsumof850000Rand(approximately60660
€)foracow-calfcombination(Bentley29September2014).
In2013,SANParksofficialsnoted“aspikeinthemarketofguysbuyingbig”.Suchprivate
operatorseitherhaveimmensefarmingoperationsorarebackedbycorporateinterests
(Interviews,2013).WhilePelhamJonesofthePrivateRhinoOwnersAssociation(PROA)
estimatedapotentiallossof400000hectaresofrhinohabitatduetoanestimated40
reservessellingtheirrhinos(Jones2014),bigrhinofarmersandcorporateconservation
venturesarefillingthegap.Althoughthecontinuedsaleofrhinostoprivateoperatorsis
toutedasaninsurancepolicyforthesurvivaloftherhino(InterviewwithSANParksofficial,
2013),inadequateattentionispaidtothebuyer’sprofileandtheviabilityoftheirrhino
breedingandfarmingoperations.DespiteBuijs’callonparksauthoritiestoinstitutethesedue
diligenceandbackgroundchecksonrhinobuyersmorethanthreedecadesago,rhinos
continuedtobesoldtothehighestbidderupuntilrecently.TheformerMinisterofWaterand
205
EnvironmentalAffairsacknowledgedinresponsetoaparliamentaryquestionthatSANParks
putnorestrictionsonthesalecontractsrelatingto“huntingandforanyactivitybeyondthe
sale”(Sonjica2010).
Table8:SANParks'revenuefromthetotalsaleofwildlifeversusliverhinosales(2011-2014)
RevenueinZAR Revenuein€245
2011246 30000000 3140516
2012 43310139 4248299
2013 22701052.49 2105694
2014 38236982 2881620
Totalwildlifesales(2011–2014) 134248173.49 12376129
Totalrhinosales(2011–2014) 81060538 6787009
Saleofotherwildanimals(2011–2014) 53187635 5589120
Source:SouthAfricanNationalParks(2010/2011:12);SouthAfricanNationalParks(2011/2012:12);SouthAfricanNationalParks(2012/2013:10);SouthAfricanNationalParks(2013/2014:17)
Oncetherhinoleavesthenationalparks,itbecomestheresponsibilityofprovincial
authorities.Infact,unlessapotentialrhinobuyerhasbeenformallychargedwithacriminal
offence,rhinoscouldbe(andwere)soldtoknownroguewildlifeprofessionalsandrhino
ownersimplicatedinillegalhuntingandpseudo-hunting–anumberoftherhinobuyerson
Sonjica’slisthavebeenchargedwithillegalhunting,racketeeringandrelatedoffencesinthe
interim(Sonjica2010).247AKNPofficialexplainsthedilemma(InterviewwithKNPofficial6,
2013):
245TheannualaverageexchangerateofSouthAfricanRandtoEuroprovidedbyoanda(www.oanda.com)wasemployedtoconvertthesalesnumbersintoEuro.Amountsareroundeduptothenextdecimal.246TheauthorsoftheSANParksannualreportfor2010/2011(SouthAfricanNationalParks2011/2012:13)provideanapproximateamountforthesaleofwildanimals,stating“thetotalincomegeneratedforthe2010/11financialyearexceededR30millionexclusiveofVAT.”247Whilesecurityconcernsmightbealegitimatereasonnottodisclosenamesofrhinobuyers,the2010disclosurerevealed‘creative’practices,suchaswildlifeveterinariansandgamecapturersbuyingrhinosonbehalfofothers(e.g.DrKarelToetboughtrhinosforDawieGroenewald,whohasbeenchargedwithmorethan1,700crimesinvolvingtheillegaltradeinrhinohorn).
206
“Wedecidedtodopre-tenderqualificationsbecauseatourauctionswehaveverylittlecontroloverwhoyousellit[therhino]to.Sowhenyouputitoutonanadvertandpeoplebid,andthenyoulookatthebestprices,andweallocateaccordingly.Andthenwehaveahabitatformthatwesendoutandaquestionnaire.Sowedotryandactresponsiblywithwhomwesellto;butobviouslyit’salittlebitmorecomplexthanthat,becausewhoeverbuysitfromusdoesn’tnecessarilykeepit,hemightselliton.Youknow.Sowe’reactuallydependentontheprovincialpermitssystemstobefunctionalandIdon’tthinkthat’sthecase.Sothat’swhyweputextrastepsinplacetotryandmitigatethat.Likethatquestionnaireandifsomebodywantstobuymorethan20rhinosheneedstoindicatewhathewantstodowiththemandwheretheywillbeheldandyouknowifit’sfreerangeorintensiveandallofthosetypesofthings...[…]…Well,atonestage,wehadasortofapproachthatifthepersonhasn’tbeenformerlychargedwecan’treallynotsupplytothem,ifthey’vegotalegalpermitandthey’veactuallygoteverything.Butwe’veactuallytightenedthatupnow.Ifpeoplearebeinginvestigated,wewilltryandnottoselltothemdirectly.Unfortunatelypeoplearecleverandtheyknowwaysofgettingaroundthings.”
Thedisconnectbetweenrhinoconservationobjectives,transparentadministrativeprocedures
andduediligencecheckscameunderthespotlightinAugust2014.Atthetime,theMinister
ofEnvironmentalAffairsmadeanannouncementthatupto500rhinoswouldbetranslocated
toothernationalparks,privategamereservesandforeignlocationsaspartoftheintegrated
rhinoconservationstrategy.InanexposéandacomplainttoSouthAfrica’spublicprotector
shortlyaftertheannouncement,wildlifeactivistsrevealedthat260rhinoshadalreadybeen
soldtothreehuntingoutfitsintheNorthernCape(Thomson16August2014;MacLeod9
September2014).Atleastoneofthethreeoutfitshadlinkstopseudo-andillegalhunting
syndicates(Thomson16August2014,independentlyconfirmedbyanorganizedcrime
investigator,2015)andapossibleconflictofinterestwasnotedasoneSANParksboard
memberhadinterestsinoneofthehuntingfarmsinthepast(Thomson16August2014).
Subsequenttotheexposé,SANParkscancelledthesalescontracts;thedepositswere
returnedtotheoutfitters,andanofficialwassuspendedpendingtheoutcomeofarbitration
proceedings.Itwasallegedthattheofficialhadsignedoffonthedealswithouttheboard’s
approval,whichhe,inturn,denied(Reinstein21August2014).WhilethePublicFinance
ManagementAct1of1999permitsthedisposalofmoveablestateassets“atmarketrelated
valueorbytenderorauction”(quotedbyThomson16August2014)andsecurity
considerationsmightlegitimizethemoveawayfromauctions;however,privatedirectsales
andcachedtenderproceduresimpedepublicandmediascrutinyofthesaleofvaluable
speciesofSouthAfrica’snaturalheritagetoprivateandpublicentitiesinSouthAfricaand
207
abroad.Beyondwithdrawingrhinosalesfromthepublicrealmandscrutiny,thesalesprices
areopentopricefixing,manipulationandcorruptactivities.The260rhinosallegedlywereto
besoldfor60millionRand(approximately4213900€),equatingtoanaveragepriceof230
700Randperrhino(approximately16200€)(Thomson16August2014).Rhinosaleshave
beenachievinghigherpricesatprivategameauctions(comparewithTable9)andtheaverage
priceofwhiterhinosattheEzemveloKZNWildlifepublicauctionwasapproximately423100
Randperanimal(approximately29600€)in2014(Bentley29September2014).Theprivate
salesofrhinos,theswappingofrhinosforotherwildanimalsorfarmorenefariousactivities
includingtheswappingofrhinohornforliverhinoswillbediscussedinthenextchapter.After
thebotchedrhinosales,aSANParksspokespersonreleasedasetofcriteria248thatSANParks
employedtodeterminewhetherrhinoswouldbetranslocatedtopotentialbuyers.Itremains
unclearwhetherthesecriteriaareconsideredwhensalescontractsareinitiallysigned.
Whatisparticularlyinterestingaboutmostpublicandprivateauctionsofrhinosisthatthe
animalsaredescribedintermsof“lengthofhornininches”(Interviews,2013).Inthatvein,it
iscuriousthattheVleissentraalauctioneersdescribeoneoftherhinocowsonauctionas
“pregnantofa33“[inch]bull”(seeTable9),which,inthiscase,referstothelengthofthe
bull’shorn.Thepeculiardescriptionsupportsthenotionthatthepriceofarhinois
determinedintermsofthelengthofitshorns(orpotentiallengthoftheprogeny’shorn)
ratherthangender,fecundityorage.Interviewswithwildlifeprofessionals,parkofficialsand
rhinofarmers(Interviews,2013)confirmedtheratherprecariousrelationshipthatemerged
betweenthestateandprivateoperators.Saysonewildlifeprofessional(Interview,2013):
“Sowhatalotofpeoplemissisnotonlytheentitlementthatthefarmerfeelsandthatheistrulyentitledto.Hejustboughtthis[rhino].Mostofthemcomefromtheparks.Andtheyboughtthem,eitherbyinchorhornbuttheyboughtthem–notonebuthundreds.Thelastauctionitwas100inchesoutofHluhluwe.249Soyouaretalkingabout200rhinosperyearatleast.Theywerecomingoutinnumbers,asfastasourtruckscouldmovethem.Weweredrivingrhino,youknow.Beforetheban,Iwas
248Thetranslocationcriteriaincludethehistoricalrangeofhabitats,suitablehabitatpresent,welfareconsiderationssuchassufficientspaceforsocialinteractions,safetyandsecurityofrhinos,themanagementexperienceofmanagersand/orrhinos,thelegalhistoriesofmanagersandownersandlogisticalchallenges(Reinstein21August2014).249HluhluweiMfoloziParkisapublicnaturereserveinSouthAfrica.TheParkwasmentionedearlierinconnectionwith“OperationRhino”,thesuccessfulrhinoexpansionprogrammeoftheformerNatalParksBoard.
208
probablydoingabout300peryear.Wewerereallymovingrhinoaround.Therewasaveryhealthyindustryassociatedwithit.Theyusedtobeamarket,nowit’sonlyinNamibia.”
Table9:PriceofrhinosatVleissentraalprivateauctionsinSouthAfricain2014
PriceperrhinoinRand(March’14)
Pricein€250 PriceperrhinoinRand(May2014)
Pricein€
Whiterhinobull 225000 15454 310000 21721
Whiterhinocow
andcalf
530000 36404 750000 52550
Whiterhino
heifer(pregnant
of33”bull)
600000 41212 / /
Whiterhinocow 540000 37091 450000 31530
Whiterhino
heifer
380000 26101 / /
Source:extractedfromVleissentraal(2014);Thomson(16August2014);MacLeod(9September2014)
Beyondthesaleofrhinostolocaloperators,rhinosarealsosoldtosafariparksandzoological
gardenselsewhereintheworld.Thesaleofliveanimalsandtheirtranslocationtoforeign
destinationsconstitutesalegalflowofrhinosandtheirhorn,permittedbytheCITES
regulatoryframework.Thislegalflowcameunderthespotlightafterliverhinosweresoldto
rhinohornconsumercountries,includingVietnamandChina.AccordingtotheDepartmentof
WaterandEnvironmentalAffairs,atotalof101rhinoswereexportedfromSouthAfrica
between1January2007and20April2012.30rhinosofthe101rhinosobtainedpermit
endorsementsatORTamboInternationalAirport,SouthAfrica’smajorinternationalairport.
250Thepricein€wasdeterminedviathehistoricalexchangeconverteronwww.oanda.com.Theamountsareroundedofftothenextdecimal.
209
TheNorthwestProvincialAuthority251hadinitiallyapprovedthepermitapplicationsofthe
rhinos;however,noneofthepermitapplicationsstatedthenameoftherhinoexporter
(originator)orthefinalrecipientintheimportingcountriesinAsia.Insomecases,theaddress
oftheimporterwasgiven(Molewa2012b).Privateoperatorsincludinggamecaptureand
translocationcompanieswereinvolvedinthesaleofrhinostoAsiancountries.ASANParks
official(InterviewwithConservator12,2013)said:
“Fromourselves,therewasnotdirectlyanyexporttoChina.ItwastakentoAustralia,toAmerica,andthatwasthroughtheInternationalRhinoFoundation,whichwasamajorzoo.YouhadtogoandinspectthezoosinthewholeInternationalRhinoFoundationsothosewereaboveboard.Animalsthatwereboughtfromus,wewon’tbeabletosaywhatwentwherebecauselikeIsayifthey’vegotdestinationsthatwe’vegotonourpermitsystem,fromtheretheycouldhavegoneanywheretheycouldhavebeenloadedstraightontotheplaneormaybehunted,wewon’tknow.”
Inresponsetoaparliamentaryquestionregardingtheexportofafurthersevenwhiterhinos
toVietnamin2012(Vietnamhadbeenidentifiedasamajorconsumercountrybythen),the
DEAadvisedthattheCITESmanagementandscientificauthorityinVietnamhadconfirmed
thattheanimalswouldbeusedforzoologicalpurposesonly.Moreover,therecipientwas
“suitablyequippedtohouseandcarefortheanimals”(Molewa2012a).252Atthetimeofthe
parliamentaryquestion,theDEAwasintheprocessofformalizinganadditionalrequirement,
whichhassincethenbeenimplemented.InlinewiththeCITESConferenceResolution11.20
(Milliken/Shaw2012:44),therecipientcaptivefacilityisrequiredtobeaninstitutional
memberoftheWorldAssociationofZoosandAquaria(WAZA)andthereceivingcountry
shouldpossessadequatelegislationtoensurethattheliveanimalsareonlyusedforthe
purposesindicatedontheCITESexportandimportpermitstopreventunauthorizeduse
(Interviewwithgovernmentofficial3,2013).Whileitisamatterofconjecturewhathappened
totherhinosthatwenttoChina,Vietnam,Turkmenistan,JapanandMyanmar–thereis
anecdotalevidencethatsomerhinosweresenttostate-runcaptivebreedingfacilitiesin
China,wherethehornwasharvestedforscientificpurposes(Interviews,2013).
251OfficialsintheemployofthepermittingauthorityoftheNorthwestProvincehavebeenlinkedtopermitfraudandattending‘pseudo’huntsinvolvingVietnamesehunterswithoutinvestigatingwhyso-calledprofessionalhunterswereunabletoshootthetargetoftheirtrophyhuntsthemselves(seeChapter6).252AttemptsweremadetoestablishdetailsofthefateofthosesevenrhinoswhileonfieldworkinVietnam.ApparentlyfiveoftheoriginalrhinoshadsurvivedandwerelivinginasafariparknearHoChiMinhCity(Interviews,2013).
210
Theprivatizationofwildlifeputfurtherdistancebetweenlocalcommunities,landownersand
wildlife,creatingcommunityperceptionsthatwildlifeconservationtrumpedconcernsover
socialandeconomicdevelopment.Thecolonialandapartheidlandgrabscontributedtoa
growingpoolofpotentialwould-bepoachersandsympathyonthepartofthecommunity
whoseepoachingasaformofdefianceandrebellionagainstunfairandsystemicexclusion.
Thenatureconservationbureaucracyfollowedthepathlaidoutbythecolonialrulersin
separatinglocalpeoplefromwildlife.Likethecolonialpoachingregulations,apartheid
conservationmeasurescanonlybeunderstoodinthecontextofbroaderpolitical,economic
andsocialmacro-structuresaimedsystemicoppressionofblackpeople.Conservation
measuresandregulationsservedtoentrenchwhiteminorityrule.Thissectionalsotouched
onconservationinthepost-colonialcontext,pointingtothegrowingnexusbetween
conservationandprivatebusinessinterests.Thefollowingsectionexaminestheriseof
neoliberalconservationinitiatives.
4.5Theascendancyofneoliberalconservation?
ThefirstsectionofthischaptertouchedonthelossoflandandhuntingrightsinSouthAfrica
duringthecolonialperiod,whichwasreplicatedacrossgeographiesinsouthernAfrica
includingSouthAfrica’sneighbourMozambique.‘Fortressconservation’servedthepolitical
eliteduringthecolonialperiod,asitbroughtlargeareasoflandintodirectcontrolofthestate
andledtotheevictionofAfricanpeople.ThemythofwildAfrica,endless‘emptyland’andan
African‘GardenofEden’informedthisanachronisticWeltbild.Thisconservationparadigm
prevailedintothe1960sand1970swiththenextgenerationofpoliticalelitesinsouthern
Africa(mostofsouthernAfricawasstillundercolonialleadership)continuingtoupholdthe
principlesofsegregationandprotectionism.Thisinvolvedfurtherdemarcationof“designated
wildplacesandspecies”protectedfrom“humanpredationatatimewhenhumanactivity
wasbecomingmoreextensiveandpervasive”(Murphree2013:XV).The1980sand1990ssaw
theascendancyofthesustainableuseparadigm.ConservationorganizationsandNGOs
startedtodevelopprogrammesthatpromotedlocalparticipationinandbeneficiationfrom
211
conservation,suchastheCommunalAreasManagementProgrammeforIndigenous
Resources(CAMPFIRE)programme.253
Couchedinthediscourseofsocialdevelopmentandsustainableuse,thetidehasturnedin
favourof‘fortressconservation’,astransfrontierconservationfollowsthetrajectoryof
colonialconservationpolicymaking.Thesignificant‘innovation’oftheoldparadigmisthe
increasingprivatizationofconservationmanagementandareas,aswellastheweightyroleof
non-stateactors,suchasconservationNGOsandcorporations.Theunderlyingconservation
philosophystraddlesthenatureandculturedichotomy.Thediscourseof‘othering’of
indigenousandlocalcommunitiesisstillemployed.Suchcommunitiesareeitherperceivedas
“traditional,livinginharmonywithnatureanddisplayingconservingbehaviour”oras
“modernizedanddestroyingit”(Duffy2001:7).Turnedonitshead,theproclamationofhuge
tractsoflandastransnationalconservationareashasseriouseconomic,socialandcultural
consequencesforpeoplelivinginsideorontheedgeofthesenewmegaparks.Although
claimingtothecontrary,suchparksencroachuponthelivelihoodsandculturalgoodsoflocal
people.Thesetransnationalparksaredesignatedasa“globalenvironmentalgood”,which
hasledtoprescriptionsofwhatisdeemed“appropriateandinappropriateresource
use”(Duffy2001:7).Communitieslivinginareasdesignatedorproclaimedasconservation
areasareincreasingly‘asked’torelocatebecauseofinappropriateresourceuse,sometimes
onavoluntarybasis,andsometimesonalessvoluntarybasis.
253ThequotedauthorMarshallMurphreewasoneoftheinitiatorsofCAMPFIRE,aZimbabweancommunity-basednaturalresourcemanagementprogramme.CAMPFIREhasbeenusedasablueprintforsimilarprojectsinsouthernAfricasuchasthecommunityconservanciesinNamibiaandMozambique.Community-BasedNaturalResourceManagement(CBNRM)waspopularwithdonorsinthe1990sduetoitssupposedbenefitsofcombiningecologicalsensitivitywithruralpovertyalleviation,achievedthrougheconomicexpansionandinstitutionalgrowth.PerhapsthemostdamningcritiqueofcommunalcommonpropertyproprietorshipseesCBNRMprogrammesas“creaturesofacommoncolonialheritageoflandandresourceexpropriation”,where“thepostcolonialstatefindsitselfperpetuatingalegaldefenceofillicitlyobtainedprivaterightsofthelandedelite(Wilson2005:150).”
212
4.5.1Casestudy:ThecreationoftheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark
Chapter7dealswithrhinopoachingintheKrugerNationalPark,aphenomenonclosely
associatedwiththehistoryoftheparkandthecreationofanewtransfrontierpark.
TheformationoftheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark(GLTP)servesasacasestudyto
demonstratetheproblematicassumptionsofthe‘new’neoliberalconservationapproach.The
KrugerNationalPark,togetherwiththeLimpopoNationalPark(hereafterLNP)andthe
GonarezhouNationalParkinZimbabweformpartofatransnationalconservationareaor
peacepark254calledtheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark(hereafterGLTP),whichwas
formallylaunchedinNovember2001.255ThewealthySouthAfricancigarettetycoonAnton
Rupert256drovetheinitiative,supportedbyPrinceBernhardfromtheNetherlandsandformer
SouthAfricanpresidentNelsonMandela.RupertcreatedtheNGOPeaceParksFoundation
(PPF),whichhasbecomethelobbyingvehiclefordevelopingpeaceparksinitiativesacross
southernAfrica.ThePPFwasinstrumentalincoordinatingtheinstitutionalandadministrative
structuresoftheGLTPwithSouthAfricangovernmentstakeholderssuchastheDepartment
ofEnvironmentalAffairsandTourism(DEAT)andtheSouthAfricanNationalParksauthority
(SANParks),257andobtainingfinancialsupportfromtheWorldBankandinternationaldonor
254Theconceptofpeaceparksderivesfromtheperceptionthattheamalgamationofnationalparksinseparatestatesbutadjacenttooneanotherwassymbolicofpeace.Thecontentionisthat‘artificial’politicalbordersarereplacedwith‘natural’borders.Theoriginoftheconceptistracedbacktothefirst“peacepark”alongtheCanadianandUSborder,theWaterton/GlacierInternationalPeacePark,whichwasestablishedin1932(Ramutsindela2007:29–30).255Theconservationareaspansaterritoryof37572km2acrossthethreecountries.TheNGOPeaceParksFoundation(PPF),themaindrivingforcebehindtransfrontierconservationinsouthernAfricaisplanningtheexpansionoftheconservationareainto“theworld’sgreatestanimalkingdom”,spanninganareaofalmost100000km2.ThisundertakingwouldseeBanhineandZinaveNationalParks,theMassingirandCorumanaareasandinterlinkingregionsinMozambique,aswellasseveralprivately-andstate-ownedconservationareasinSouthAfricaandZimbabwe,integratedintothetransfrontierpeacepark(PeaceParksFoundation2014a).256SpierenburgandWels(2010)shinealightonthedarkersideofthebusinessandnatureconservationnexusinsouthernAfricainapaperentitled“ConservativePhilanthropists,RoyaltyandBusinessElitesinNatureConservationinSouthernAfrica”.ThemainargumentisthatRupertandhisassociatePrinceBernhardfromtheNetherlandssawintransfrontierconservationanopportunitytofixtheirtarnishedreputations.Rupert,whohadbeenamemberoftheAfrikanersecretgrouping“Broederbond”,hadactivelysupportedtheapartheidregimewhilePrinceBernhardhadbeenembroiledinabriberyscandal.257Wolmer(2003:269)arguesthattheSouthAfricanNationalParksBoardwentwiththeideaofestablishingtheGLTPforanumberofreasons.Theseincludedlegitimizingitsexistencebyadopting“apotentialcausecelebré”(theapartheideraNationalParksBoardhadbeenanall-whiteensembleofconservators,someofwhomhadlinkstotheapartheidsecurityapparatus).Conservatorswereapparentlyalsoworriedaboutincreasingnumbersofwar-displacedpeoplemovingintotheborderareas,sothecreationofatransfrontierparkwouldcreateabufferzone.Atthetime,theKNPwasalsodealingwithelephantpopulationnumbersthatexceededitscarrying
213
agencies.TheGLTPhasbeenportrayedasan“unequalpartnership”betweenSouthAfricaas
theregionaleconomicandpoliticalpowerhouse,andMozambiqueandZimbabwe,which
werebothdealingwithdomesticissues(Lunstrum2013;Ramutsindela2007;Wolmer
2005).258TheSouthAfricangovernment,itsprivatepartnersandinternationalfinancierstook
theleadindevelopingthepeaceparksinitiative,whichgainedtractioninMozambican
governmentcirclesinthelate1990s.Theimplementationappearedtorequireminimal
investmentbytheMozambicanstate,259whilesupposedlybeneficialtothecountryasa
whole.Internationaldonorsweregoingtoshoulderthecostofsettingupinstitutionaland
regulatoryframeworks,thecontroversialresettlementofcommunities,aswellasthestart-up
costsofthePark.
Therewasalsothepromiseofeconomicandsocialdevelopmentofruralcommunitiesliving
withinandontheperipheriesofthePark.Duringtheinitialnegotiations,aninclusive
approachtonatureconservationwasprofessed.Projectpartnersweretaskedwithseeking
sociallegitimacyoftheParkbyofferingbenefitstoresidentsinsideandontheedgeofthe
Park(Spierenburg2011:83).Thetransfrontierconservationareawasgoingto‘payforitself’
throughinternationaldonormonies,opportunitiesforprivateinvestments,eco-tourism
initiativesandcommunity-basednaturalresourcemanagement.ApivotalaspectoftheLNP
wasthere-introductionofwildlifefromtheKNP,whichwasgoingtobeprotectedand
conservedthroughthecreationofarangerforceandbyinvestingthecommunityinthegood
fortunesofthePark.ThePPFhadmobilizedagreatdealofinternationalandnational(South
African)funding.Donorfundingseldomcomeswithoutstringsattachedandinthecaseofthe
capacity.Conservatorshadinstitutedelephantcullingwhichhadledtovociferousinternationalcampaigningbyanimalrightsgroups.Itwashopedthatdroppingthefenceswouldencourageelephantmigration,andmorethan1100Krugerelephantswereearmarkedforthenewconservationarea(Magome/Murombedzi2012:124).258OneschoolofthoughthasreferredtotheprocessthatledtothecreationoftheGLTPas“Krugerization”whereby“politicalandeconomicintereststhatarehistoricallyembeddedintheKrugerNationalParkarebeingextendedbeyondthebordersofSouthAfrica,stillservingaprivilegedgroupattheexpenseofmostlyblackpeople”(Ramutsindela2007:2–3).Ramutsindela(2007:2)acknowledgestheprominentroleofAfrikanersinthecreationoftheGLTPbutpointstotheheterogeneityoftheAfrikanersinSouthAfrica,aswellastheinternationaloriginsofthenotionofpeaceparks.HeprovidesanuancedanalysisoftransfrontierconservationareasinAfricainhisbook“ConservationinAfrica:AttheConfluenceofCapital,PoliticsandNature”.Ramutsindelaandotherscholars(Büscher2010;Büscher/Davidov2013;Büscher/Dressler2012;Büscher/Dressler/Fletcher2014;McFee1999)exploretheroleofcapitalandprivatizationinconservation.259ConsultationwiththecommunitiesaffectedbythecreationoftheParkwasoneofthekeyresponsibilitiesoftheMozambicangovernment.
214
GTFP,boththedonorsandthePPFdeterminedimportantaspectsofthefinalphysical
contoursandoperationalaspectsoftheconservationarea.SouthAfricathroughitsDEATand
thePPFnegotiatedthetermsandconditionsleadingtotheestablishmentoftheLimpopo
NationalParkandtheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark.Thesedifferedvastlyfromthe
initiallyagreedtoestablishmentofamulti-useconservationarea“thatwouldallowhuman
habitationandsustainableuseofresources”(Lunstrum2013:4).SANParkswasnotwillingto
considertherelocationofwildanimalsintoahuntingarea,whichwastheofficialstatusofthe
Coutada16260atthetime.Theparksauthoritywasonlygoingtosignoffthedealifthenew
conservationareaguaranteedmaximumprotection(Milgroom/Spierenburg2008:438).
WhentheLPNwasproclaimedasatotalprotectionzonein2001,therewasnowildlifeinthe
areaoftheformerCoutada16;however,27000peoplewereresidinginthearea.These
villagecommunities261hadbeenaffectedbydisplacementduringthecolonialperiodandthe
civilwar.Theyhadreturned,rebuiltandreconstructedtheirlivesandlivelihoodsaftertheend
ofthecivilwar(Lunstrum2010:139).Inaperhapsironictwistoffate,some7,000villagers
havetorelocate‘tomakespaceforwildanimals’thatwerenolongerlivinginthearea
whereasthevillagerswere(Interviews,2012and2013).Inpreparationfortheproclamation
ofthePark,thelanduserightsoftheformerhuntingreserveCoutada16werechanged.In
Mozambique,thestatehastheprerogativetochangeunilaterallylanduserightsifitserves
thepublicinterest(Spierenburg/Steenkamp/Wels2006:94).Inthisinstance,Coutada16was
changedfromamulti-useconservationareatoa“totalprotectionzone”.Accordingtothe
MozambicanLandActof1997,noeconomicactivity,resourceuseoroccupationisallowedin
“totalprotectionzones”(Tanner2002:36–37).ThelegaldraftersbehindtheLandActhadnot
consideredtenurerightsofcommunitieslivinginareasthatweresubsequentlydeclaredtotal
protectionzones(Norfolk2004:13)andasaresultresidentsoftheLNPfoundthemselvesina
stateoflegalambiguityastheirtenurerightsremainedundefined(Witter2013:407).Experts
onbehalfoftheUnitedStatesAgencyforInternationalDevelopment(USAID)andthePeace260TheCoutada16hadbeenahuntingreserveduringthecolonialperiodandbecameahideoutforRenamofightersduringthecivilwar.Weaponcachesremainedconcealedinthearealongafterthewarhadended.Someoftheseweaponshavefoundtheirwaybackintocirculationashuntingriflesofpoachers.Thereservehadbeendepletedofwildlife,servingasoneofthefewavailablefoodsourcesduringandafterthecivilwar.261Whiletheterm“communities”isusedthroughoutthisdissertation,thetermisusedwithcaution,ascommunitiesarebynomeansahomogenousgroupofpeople.
215
ParksFoundation(PPF)drewupalanduseplanandastudyontourismdevelopment,which
earmarkedtheareasadjacenttotheShingwedziRiverasofferingthebestopportunitiesfor
developingviablepopulationsofwildlifewhileequallyattractivetotheinternationaltourist
market(Milgroom/Spierenburg2008:3).Theexpertsalsodeclaredthattheareawouldbe
moreappealingtoprivatetouristoperatorsifthevillageswereremoved(Spierenburg2011:
94).Asaconsequence,peoplelivingineightvillagesalongtheShingwedziRiverinsidethe
parkweretoldthattheyhadtomovetoareasoutsidethepark.Adisputeensuedbetween
theMozambicanMinistryofTourismandtheconcernedvillagersoverwhetherthey
‘belonged’totheParkandwhattheirrightswere(Spierenburg/Steenkamp/Wels2006:94).
Thestatewonthedisputeandasaconsequenceofthechangedconservationstatusofthe
area,some7,000villagerswouldhavetorelocate“tomakespaceforwildanimals”thatwere
tobereintroducedfromtheKNP.Theoddityofmovingpeopletoaccommodatewildanimals
ledaffectedcommunitiestobelievethatthestate’sprioritieswereskewedinfavourofwild
animalsandtheirbenefactors(SANParks)fromSouthAfrica(Interviews,2012and2013).
NegativesentimentstowardsKrugeranditsabundantpopulationsofwildanimalsstartedto
arisethen,providingamplemotivationstopoachwildanimalsinyearstocome.Aswillbe
showninChapter7,thesemotivationsarenotonlybasedoneconomicneedsand
impoverishmentbutalsoonenvironmentaljusticeprinciples(poachingasanactofdefiance).
TheGermanDevelopmentBank262stipulatedthatallrelocationswouldhavetohappenona
voluntarybasis(Milgroom/Spierenburg2008:3).Unlikeincolonialtimeswhererelocation
wasforcedfromthebarrelofagun,communitieswereincentivized,andthenarrativeof
‘voluntary’resettlementor‘choice’wasemployed(Witter2013:407).Inotherwords,
villagersweresupposedlygivenagencytodecidewhethertostayorgo.Itisamatterof
conjecturewhetherchoosingtomoveoutoftheparktomitigatetheeffectsofhuman-
wildlifeconflict263andeconomicmarginalization(Lunstrum2013;Witter2013,Focusgroup
withvillagersresettledfromLPNin2013),constitutes‘voluntaryresettlement’oralastresort
262Asoneofthemainfundersbehindtheestablishmentofthepeacepark,theGermanBankalsocarriedthecostofresettlingthevillagers.263Witter(2013)providesadetailedaccountofhowthere-introductionofelephantsinparticular,andotherdangerouswildlifeincludingrhinosandlions,totheLNPhascausedmajordisruptionsanddamagetocommunitiesremaininginsidethepark,andaffectedtheirlivelihoods.
216
toescapethe“diminishedaccesstoculturalandenvironmentalsources”(Witter2013:407).A
focusgroupwithrecentlyresettledvillagers(fromtheParktoMassingir)suggestedthe
heterogeneouscompositionofvillagesandvaryinglevelsofacceptanceoftherelocation.
Whiletheobjectiveofthefocusgroupwastocollectdataonrhinopoachinganditsimpactat
thecommunitylevel,theconversationendedupreturningtotheissueofrelocationseveral
times.Onevillagerexplains(FocusgroupinMassingir,2013):
“Wewerehappywherewecamefrom.There’snopeacehere.Theycangiveyouahouseandthenextdaytheycanremoveyouandgiveittosomeoneelse,maybetheywillsortthatproblemoutnow.Theyoungonesgotoschool,butitisfar.Wedon’thaveaschoolhere,andtheyoutharestrugglingtogetjobsinthisvillage.Wehavenottalkedaboutwhatwewantasacommunity.”
Schmidt-SoltauandBrockington(2007:2196)makeaconvincingargumentthatvoluntary
resettlementsareunlikelyinthepoorerpartsoftheworld,giventhelackofinternational(and
oftenofnational)policiesguidingso-calledvoluntaryresettlementanddivergent
understandingsofdeterminingvolition.TheWorldBank(2001)publishedapolicyfor
involuntaryresettlementsin2001entitled‘OperationalManualOP4.12’,whichhasbecome
theinternationalstandardtoadjudicatethesuitabilityofresettlementschemes.Inlightof
beingrecognizedasaninternationalstandard,thispolicyoninvoluntaryresettlements264was
employedtoguidevoluntaryresettlementsfromtheLNP(Milgroom/Spierenburg2008:437).
TheProjectImplementationUnit(PIU)inchargeofestablishingtheLNPsetupaConsultation
CommitteeonResettlement(CCR),whichincludedrepresentativesofallthevillagesthatwere
toberesettled,anddevelopmentNGOsoperatinginthePark.Initially,electedcommunity
authoritieswithineachvillagewerehopingtocodeterminethelanduserightsandcontours
ofthefinalPark.However,oncetheParkhadbeendeclared,theirrolehadbeenreducedto
negotiatingcompensationfortheanticipatedresettlementofvillageresidents
(Spierenburg/Steenkamp/Wels2006:94)
Communitybeneficiationandprojectswereimportantelementstobeconsideredinthe
creationoftheconservationarea.Communitiesreceivea20%shareintherevenue
264Thepolicystipulatesthatinvoluntaryresettlementshouldbeavoided,andifunavoidable,thenitshoulduplifttheaffectedpeople’slives.
217
generationofthePark.265Suchrevenuesaresupposedtobenefitthecommunityasawhole;
however,thedistributionandinvestmentofsuchfundsisnotwithoutitsown
complications.266MangomeandMurombedzi(2012:124)pointoutthatacriticalmassof
‘bodiesinbeds’isrequiredtoachieve“significantjobopportunitiesandviablemultiplier
effects”.SufficetomentionherethattherehasbeennotouristboomintheLNPasyet,and
rhinopoachingandthestigmatizationoflocalcommunitiesasrhinopoachersisunlikelyto
alleviatethesituation.MilgroomandSpierenburg(2008:437),forexample,foundthatmost
residentsoftheLNP“begantofeeltheeffectsofeconomicdisplacementsoonafterthepark
wasestablishedin2001,throughtheapplicationofnewparkregulationsprohibitinghunting
andrestrictingextractionofforestproductsforcommercialpurposes”.Foodsecuritywas
greatlydiminishedascultivationinsidetheParkisforbiddenunlesstheareawasusedfor
farmingpriortothedeclarationofthePark.267Accesstoemergencypasturesforcattleinthe
Parkwasforbiddenduringtimesofdrought.Moreover,thereintroductionofpredators
affectedbothcropsandcattle,aggravatinghuman-wildlifeconflict(Spierenburgquotedby:
Aretsetal.2011:58).
Whilemanycommunitymemberswerenolongerabletoekeoutalivingandhadtofind
alternateformsofincome,themajorityofvillagerschosetoremainwithintheLimpopo
NationalParkafteritsinitialinception.Thischoicesignalsthepreferenceofvillage
communitiestostayintheParkandcontinuewiththeirlivesandlivelihoodsuninterrupted.
Duetothediminishedincomeopportunitiesandincreasingpressure(‘carrotandstick’),
villagershavestartedtoaccepttherelocationpackages.Althoughcouchedinthenarrativeof
‘voluntaryresettlement’and‘improvedlivelihoods’,manyvillagersfeelforcedtomove
(Interviewwithacademic2and3,2012;focusgroupwithresettledvillagers,2013).The
resettlementofcommunities,aswellasthosewhochosetostayinsidethePark,hasledto
265Since2006,theLNPhashandedanamountof€174410tocommunities,whichtheyhaveinvestedintheconstructionofacraftcentre,therehabilitationofclassrooms,thecreationofpotablewatersupplysystemsandalivestockassociation(PeaceParksFoundation2014d).266Abodyofliteraturespeakstothisissuebutitisbeyondthefocusofthisdissertation(forexample:Fall2002;Singh,S.2008).267Soilfertilityandharvestyieldsdecreasethroughcontinueduseofthesamepieceofland.Italsoleadstolanddegenerationandmassiveerosion,whichcarriessevereenvironmentalimpacts.Essentially,thisrestrictedformoflanduseisnotonlycontributingtolessfoodsecuritybutalsototheenvironmentaldegradationoftheland.
218
diminishedincomestreamsandchangingsocialrelations.Whiletheresettlementpolicywas
supposedtoenablecommunityempowermentandsocialdevelopment,thetransitionprocess
hasbeenlessthansmooth,andtheresettlementfromacceptancetorelocationhasbeen
slow.Insteadofbeinginchargeoftheirlivelihoods,thenewstatusquohasdeprived
communitiesofagencyasregardstochoosingwheretolive268andhowtoprovidefortheir
livelihoods.
PossiblythesinglemostproblematicaspectofthecreationofboththeLNPandGLTPliesin
theapproachtakentopeoplewhowerelivingwithintheboundariesofthedesignatedparkin
Mozambique.Thechosenrouteisnotdissimilartothecolonialapproachesdescribedinthe
earliersection.Insteadofbuildingharmoniousandbeneficialrelationshipsbetweenlocal
villagecommunitiesandwildlife(assuggestedbytheoxymoron‘peacepark’),thecreationof
theLNPhasledtohuman-wildlifeconflict,impoverishment,aswellaswidespreadcontempt
forconservationinitiativesandthe‘BigBrother’nextdoor–themanagement,rangersand
environmentalcrimeinvestigatorsoftheKNP(Interviewswithconvictedpoachers,2013).A
significantoversightwastheinadequateconsultationwithcommunitiesdirectlyaffectedby
thecreationofthenewpark.Inessence,furthermarginalizationofinsitucommunities(which
arenothomogeneousentities)andindividualscouldhavebeenmitigated.Theestablishment
oftheparkhasledtoagrowingpoolofunhappyvillagecommunities.Inlightoftheabove,it
isnotsurprisingthatmanyrhinopoachersoriginatefromdisplacedandmarginalizedvillage
and/orruralcommunities(Interviewswithorganizedcrime,environmentalcrime
investigatorsandpoachers,2013and2014).
AnimportantelementlinkedtotheestablishmentoftheGLTPwastheremovalofthe
physicalboundariesbetweentheparticipatingcountries.Theabolishmentofartificiallydrawn
bordersofthecolonialperiod(whichwerephysicallyreinforcedwhenthepostcolonial
268Atthetimeofwriting,120familieshadbeenrelocatedtoBangavillageneartheMassingirdam.WhiletherearekinshiptiestopeoplealreadylivingsouthoftheMassingirdam,notallresidentswerehappywiththenewarrivals.Morepeopleleadtomorecompetitiononalreadyscarceresourcesandjobsinthearea.Moreover,theresettledvillagersareperceivedtoreceiveanunfairadvantageastheyreceivehousing,servicesandcompensationfromthePark(Focusgroupwithvillagers;Interviews;2013).ItneedstobenotedthatbenefitsaresupposedtoaccruetocommunitieslivinginsideandontheperipheryofthePark(PeaceParksFoundation2014c),signallingincongruencebetweencommunityperceptionsandnegotiatedoutcomes.ByMarch2016,theremainingfamiliesoftheformer300-familystrongMassingirVelho–avillageabout10kmfromtheKrugerboundary–weremovedabout75kmfromtheborder(encareporter2016).
219
MozambicangovernmentsupportedSouthAfricanliberationmovementsduringthefinal
yearsoftheapartheidregime)renderedtheconceptoftransfrontierparksappealingtomany.
Itwashopedthattheso-called‘peacepark’wouldreconciletheformerapartheidpariahstate
withitssouthernAfricanneighbours,openuphistoricalanimalmigrationroutesandrealize
conservationandsocialdevelopmentobjectives.WhileborderfencesbetweentheKNPand
LNPwerepartiallytakendown(seeFigure8),otherfenceswentuptodemarcatethe
boundariesoftheconservationareawithsurroundingcommunalland(Dzingiraietal.2013:
107).
From2001to2008,closeto5000wildanimals(including12whiterhinos)weretranslocated
fromtheKNPtotheLNPtodevelopthenewconservationarea(PeaceParksFoundation
2014b).One-third(57km)oftheoldboundaryfencehasbeendroppedsincetheinceptionof
theTFCA.Theremainderofthefencewasleftintactduetosafetyandsecurityconcerns.269
ThesectionsofdroppedfencearemostlylocatedinthefarnorthoftheKNP(witha
correspondinglowdensityofvillagersandrhinos)and12kmoffenceweredroppedinthe
middlesectionbetweentheparks.AccordingtothePPF,thefence270wasleftintact“forthe
peaceofmindofcommunitiesresidentintheLNP,especiallytheoneswithcattle”(Wray
2014).ThedroppingofthefenceaffectedthecommunitieslivingintheParkastheyhadto
dealwithunwantedvisitsfromwildanimalsthatdidnotonlyconstituteadangertotheirlives
butalsodestroyedtheircropsandattackedtheircattle.Therewasalsothedangerofthe
communicationofzoonoticdiseasessuchasanthrax,whichafflictsbuffalointheKNPat
regularintervals(Interviewwithwildlifeveterinarian3,2013).
Accordingtotheofficialnarrative,thepartialremovalofthefencedidnotonlyservea
symbolicfunctionofcreatingapeaceparkbutalsothepurposeofencouragingthenatural
migrationofwildanimalstothenewconservationarea.Inlightofrhinopoaching,the
269Severalsmugglingcorridorsarelocatedalongthe350kmlongborderbetweentheKNPandMozambique.Cross-bordercrimeincludesthesmugglingofundocumentedmigrants,stolenmotorvehicles,drugs,cigarettesandcounterfeitgoods,aswellasthetraffickingofendangeredspecies(whichgoesbeyondrhinohorn).270Inhisdoctoraldissertation,Kloppers(2005)providesafascinatinganalysisofsocialstructureswithintheborderlandsbetweenMozambiqueandSouthAfrica.Thefence(physicalboundary)playsanimportantroleinhisanalysisofwhetherphysicalboundariesbecomeentrenchedinformerlyhomogenoussocietieslivingintheborderlands.
220
droppingoftheboundaryfencehasbecomeacontroversialtalkingpointamongst
conservators,lawenforcersandanimalactivists,someofwhommoottherenewederection
ofahigh-securityfenceasastrategytofightrhinopoaching(Interviews,2013).
Figure8:TheborderfencebetweentheKrugerNationalPark,SouthAfrica&Mozambique
Source:Author’sownphototakeninasouthernsectionofKrugerNationalPark
There-erectionoftheboundaryfencemaynotonlysignalaphysicalbutalsosymbolicdefeat
ofthe“borderless”peaceparksproject,whichhadbeenenvisagedasthepanaceatopost–
warreconciliation,wildlifeconservationandcommunitydevelopmentinsouthernAfrica.
BüscherandRamutsindela(2016:1)observethatkeyactorswithintransfrontierconservation
havebeenrespondingtothepoachingcrisis“withincreasingdesperation”tosafeguardthe
peaceparksprojectand,ofcourse,therhinos.
Theprivatizationandacquisitionofformercommunallandalongtheeasternboundaryby
multinationalcorporationsandSouthAfricancompaniesinpartnershipwithinfluentialand
oftenhigh-rankinggovernmentofficialsfromMaputoisnotunproblematic.Rhinopoachers
usesomeconcessionsasaspringboardforpoachingexpeditionsintotheKNP.Thishasledto
221
jointanti-poachingpartnershipsbetweenKrugerandtheforeign-ownedconcessions.While
nottheimmediatefocusofthisdissertation,itneedstobepointedoutthattheestablishment
oftheseconcessionsfromthelate1990sonwardshasledtoyetanotherroundof
displacements,evictionsoflocalseitherlivingorutilizingthelandforcommercialpurposesin
theseareas.Somelocalsare(moreorless)gainfullyemployedontheconcessionsinjob
categoriesotherthananti-poaching(forexampleasconstruction,plantationorasfarm
labourers).Thereareseveralhuntingconcessionsthatoffer‘BigFive’huntsalongtheeastern
boundary,271whichhasledtooutcriesfromenvironmentalactivistsandmediathat“wild
animalsbelongingtotheKNP(andthepeopleofSouthAfrica)areappropriatedbygreedy
concessionairesinMozambique”(Interviewwithanimalrightsactivist1,2012).The
reputationoftheconcessionairessufferedafurtherblowafterasafarioutfitwascaught
luringlionswithbaitmountedontheboundaryfence(whichhadbeencut)outoftheKNPfor
“cannedhunting”(Interviewwithconservators,2013).272.Morerecently,themultinational
sugarcorporationTongaatHuletthascomeunderfireafterfourKrugerelephantswerekilled
andslaughterednearitsXinavanesugarprocessingmillinNovember2014(Bloch13
November2014).273Accordingtoanti-poachingandintelligenceofficersoperatinginthearea
(Interviews,2013),thesugarplantationandtwootherconcessionswereinsufficiently
guarded.274DuetotheirstrategicpositionadjacenttothesouthernsectionsoftheKNP(which
arehighrhino-densityareas)andthelackingsecuritydetail,theseconcessionshadbecome
ideallaunchingpadsforrhinopoachingandsmugglingbetweentheKNPandMozambique.275
271ThereareseveralprivatelyownedreservesalongthewesternboundaryoftheKNPinSouthAfrica,whichalsooffertrophyhuntingincludingBigFivehunts.LiketheirMozambicancounterparts,thesereserveshavebeenonthereceivingendofmassivecriticism.272Cannedhuntingreferstoatrophyhuntwheretheanimaliskeptinaconfinedspace.Thispracticeminimizesthechancesofa‘fairchase’whileincreasingthesuccessrateofthehunterbaggingakill.273TongaatHulettacquiredthe14,000hectaresMassitontoconcessionin1998.TheconcessionborderstheKNPandMagudevillage,whereseveralnotoriousgangsofpoachersoriginate.Thecorporationownscloseto90%ofthecompanyoperatingthemillwhiletheremainingsharesaccruetotheMozambicangovernment(MacLeod7November2014).274InvestigativejournalistFionaMacLeodreportedthattherehadbeenarapprochementbetweenKNPofficialsandthesugarcorporationin2014.WhileKNPfieldrangershadprovidedtrainingtostaffmembersontheplantation,“theirsuggestionsonhowtoimproveanti-poachinginterventionsatMassitontowerenotimplementedwiththenecessarysenseofurgency”(MacLeod7November2014).275Inthepast,anti-poachingtrackersdiscoveredspoorofKrugerrhinosthathadcrossedintothesugarplantations.UnsuccessfulattemptsweremadetogettherhinosrepatriatedtotheKNP,thedehornedcarcasseswerelaterfoundinneighbouringconcessions(Interviews,2013)
222
ThecommercialinterestsofMozambicangovernmentofficialsintheseconcessionsnotonly
suggestsaconflictofinterestasregardsthetransferofcommunallandintostateandprivate
ownershipbutalreadyscarcestateresourceshavebeenpromisedtoprotectandsecurethese
concessions.276
ThecentralroleofthePPFduringtheinceptionperiodoftheGLTPhascarriedthroughtothe
present.TheconservationNGOhastakenonaleadingroleintheday-to-daymanagementof
thePark.Accordingtoitswebsite(PeaceParksFoundation2014e),Mozambique“requested
PeaceParksFoundation’sassistanceinoverseeingitsdevelopmentasaSouthernAfrican
DevelopmentCommunityapprovedproject”.The‘requestforassistance’includestwo
technicaladvisors,oneinchargeofwildlifeconservationandanti-poachingoperations;the
otherisresponsibleforprojectmanagementofcommunityinitiativesanddevelopmentof
parkinfrastructures(InterviewswithPPF,2012,2013and2014).TheMozambican
governmentappointstheparkwarden.Thefundingforthedevelopmentofpark
infrastructures,communityupliftmentprojects,andconservationandanti-poaching
initiativesischannelledthroughanddisbursedbythePPF,indicatingthepowerfulroleofthe
NGO.
4.6Concludingremarks
Theobjectiveofthischapterwastodemonstratethepathdependencydisplayedby
consecutiveconservationregulatorsandtheeffectthishashadonconservation-orientated
initiatives.Wildlifeprotectionwascloselylinkedtocolonialdispossession,subjugation,
exploitationandlossofhuntingrightsoflocalcommunities.Theprivatizationoffarmlandand
wildlifefurtherexacerbatedthealienationandmarginalizationoflocalcommunities.
Underpinningtheseconservationregimesarearchaicandelitistpreservationand
conservationparadigmsthatdiscountthepotentialforharmoniousrelationshipsbetween
276FionaMacLeod(7November2014)reportedthatTongaatHuletthadrequestedassistancefromtheMozambicangovernment,whointurnhadundertakentoassign20anti-poachingprofessionalstotheconcession.
223
localcommunitiesandwildlife.Insteadofincludinglocalcommunitiesinparksand
conservation,wildlifeconservationcontinuesasastateandprivatesector-drivenenterprise.
Parksandgamereservescontinuetopresentmanifestationsofcolonialdispossessionand
apartheidsegregation.Morethantwentyyearsaftertheendofapartheid,conservationareas
arestillseenassymbolsofwhiteeliteinterestsandwealth,inaccessibletothepoormajority.
Theseproblematicconservationapproachesandparadigmshaveledtoahistoricallock-in,
whereromanticandutopiannotionsof‘Africa’sWildEden’continuetounderminesupport
andbuy-inoflocalcommunitiesinwildlifeconservation.Thequestionarisinghereis:What
arewetryingtoprotect?Withoutthebroad-basedsupportoflocalcommunities,illegal
wildlifemarketswillcontinuetoflourish.Aslongascommunitiesareexcludedfromthe
benefitsofwildlifeandparks,adeadrhinowillbevaluedhigherthanaliveone.Inlightofthe
systemicexploitationoflocalcommunitiesduringthecolonialandapartheidperiods,aswell
aseconomicdeprivationbroughtonthroughneoliberalconservationregimesnowadays,itis
notsurprisingthatmanypoachersoriginatefromthesecommunities.Whileatypicalnarrative
portraysrhinopoachersasseekingtofillcookingpotsandpocketbooks(Kahler/Gore2012),
thischaptershowedwhypoachingcouldalsobeconstruedasanexpressionofdissentand
unhappinesswiththesystem,therule-makersandtherules.
Thischapteralsodescribedhowrhinohornsupplieswereestablishedthroughtheeconomic
valuationofrhinos.TwowavesofeconomicvaluationoccurredinSouthAfrica.Thefirst
valuationinvolvedthehuntingofrhinosduringthecolonialperiodwhilethesecondvaluation
relatestothevaluationoftherhinoasatrophyanimalandatradableliveanimalfromthe
1960sand1970sonwards.ToparksauthoritiesinSouthAfrica,thesaleofliverhinos
constitutesamuch-neededcashinjection.Theeconomicvaluationhascreatedamuddled
relationshipbetweenthepublicandprivatesector,whereeconomicnecessityandbottom-
linesarepittedagainstethicalconsiderations,duediligence,andconservationobjectives.The
sectionalsobegantosketchtheoutlinesofthegrayareabetweenlegalityandillegalityon
theonehand;andlegitimacyandillegitimacyofthemarketexchangeandrulesgoverningit,
ontheother.
224
Chapter5:Theinternationalpoliticalprotectionregime:Theroadtoextinctionispavedwithgoodintentions
“AndIdreamofthevastdeserts,theforests,andallofthewildernessonourcontinent;wildplacesthatweshouldprotectasapreciousheritageforourchildrenandforourchildren’schildren.Wemustneverforgetthatitisourdutytoprotectthisenvironment(Mandela2013).“
5.1Introduction
Takenatfacevalue,theprotectiveandconservationmeasuresemployedtosafeguardthe
rhinowouldsuggestthattheanimalshouldbeoneofthebest-protectedandcaredfor
creaturesinSouthAfrica.TheSouthAfricanmilitary,amultitudeofprivatesecurity
companies,publicandprivateintelligenceoperatives,lawenforcementagenciesand
hundredsofNGOshavesteppedupprotectivemeasuresto‘save’therhino.Inspiteofallthe
‘do-gooders’,financialdonationsandthesecuritizationofwhatusedtobeseenasa
conservationissue,rhinodeathshaveescalatedoverthepastdecade.Therhinoprotection
andpoachingeconomieshavebecomethedailybreadandbutterofmanyactors,withthe
boundariesbecomingsomewhatblurred.Thischapterprovidesanoverviewofkeypolitical
actors,theiragendas,andmeasuresassociatedwithrhinoprotectionandconservation.
Thenotionofcontestedillegalityisofpivotalimportancetothischapter,asitconstitutesthe
primarylegitimationdeviceemployedbyvariousactorsalongtheillegalsupplychainin
defenceoftheirillegaleconomicactivities.Contestationoftheillegalityisintricatelylinkedto
acceptanceandsociallegitimacyofthelaw.Chapter4sketchedthehistoricalienationofrural
peoplelivinginandadjacenttoparksandshowedwhytheydonotregardtherulesas
legitimateorapplicabletothem.Thetradebanofrhinohornoriginatesinamultinational
environmentaltreaty,whichoffersinterestinginsightsastohowinternationalbansare
implementedatthelocallevelandwhyitmightbedifficulttogarnerbuy-inofsuchbans
whentheyareimposed“fromtheoutsideworld”.Whilethefocusisonactorsand
relationshipslinkedtotheillegalizationofthetradeinrhinohornandprotectionofrhinos,
manyofthesameactorsarerelevanttothestructureandfunctioningoftheillegalsupply
chainandwillalsobeofimportanceinthefinaltwochaptersofthedissertation.Chapter4
225
highlightedproblematicconservationparadigmsandtheirconversionintopolicyapproaches
andhowthisaffectedlocalcommunities.Similartothefailingsoftheconservationparadigms
andapproachesdiscussedinChapter4,thischapterarguesthattheinternationalpolitical
protectionregimeunderminesratherthanfacilitatesrhinoprotection.CITESproceedsonthe
assumptionthattradebansareappropriatemeasurestodealwithtransnationalwildlife
trafficking.
5.2Theinternationalregulatorybackdrop:CITES
TheUnitedNationsConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFauna
andFlora(CITES)providestheinternationalregulatoryframeworkforinternationaltradein
endangeredplantandanimalspecies.Itsstatedaimistoensurethatinternationaltradein
specimensofwildanimalsandplantsdoesnotthreatenthesurvivalofthespeciesinthewild,
anditaccordsdegreesofprotectiontomorethan35000speciesofanimalsandplants(CITES
2014c).Inshort,theillegalizationofthetradeinrhinosandrhinoproductsisintricatelylinked
tothismultilateralenvironmentaltreaty,conversionofitsdeterminationsintodomestic
legislationandimplementationthereof.Seenasthe‘MagnaCarta’ofwildlifebysome(Layne
1973:99),othersregardtheCITESapproachtoconservationasfundamentallyflawed(for
alternativeperspectivessee:Hutton/Dickson2000a).Asmostoftheplanet’sremaining
biodiversityislocatedintheGlobalSouthandnortherncountriesareseenasparticularly
concernedaboutthepotentiallossofbiodiversity,theConventionhasbecomeaplatformfor
North-Southconflict(Hutton/Dickson2000b:XV),anditslegitimacyhassufferedasa
consequence.Asshowninthepreviouschapter,differentparadigms,andconceptionsof
nature,preservationandconservation277determinethetrajectoryandpathdependencyof
regulatoryframeworks.Powerfulalliancesbetweenstateandnon-stateactorshavehada
lastinginfluenceonthecornerstonesofthisconvention.
277Thepreservationistparadigmreferstoafortress-likeapproachtonature,whichminimizeshumaninfluenceinordertomaintain“pristinewilderness”.Theapproachstandsinstarkcontrasttotheconservationparadigm,whichallowsforhumansandnaturetoshareacommonspaceandcoexist(Freitag2012).
226
TheCITESwasoriginallysignedinWashingtonin1973andenteredforcein1975.Earlier
regulatoryattemptstodealwiththeinternationalproblemofunsustainableexploitationof
wildlifewereunsuccessfulbecausetheformercolonialpowersstruggledtoreachconsensus
andbroadratificationofvariousinstruments(Sand1997:19).Accordingtoanacademic
specializinginenvironmentallaw(InterviewwithAcademic1,2013),theearlyattemptsat
regulatingdifferentspeciesoffaunaandfloralaidthefoundationsforindividualspecies
protectionandthesystemofnegativelisting:
“Inthe1880s,1890s,youstartedtogetthefirstprotectionandconservationlaws.Thiswasn’tthesameasitistoday.Shootingwasfortheelite,andtheywantedtobetheonlyonestoshoot.Isupposethatviewstillexiststoday.Thepoacher’sphilosophybeingusedtodaycamefromthatperiod.Ifyoulookatthe1900LondonConventionforBirdsUsefulforAgricultureandthe1902ParisConvention,theybothtaketheapproachofcategorizingspecies,andsowhenwelookatthefinalConvention,ithastwolists.Itcreateslistsofbirdsthatareusefulandbirdsthatarenoxious,poisonous,toxic–tobedisposedofonsight.Thebirdsthatwereconsideredusefulweretheonesthatateinsects.Theonesconsiderednoxious,wherethosethatateseeds.Soforexample,thebeardedvultureisonthenoxiouslist,andtodaytheyarerare.TheseConventionsweretakingtheapproachofsayingthesespecieswillbeprotectedandthosenot.Inmanyways,thatisstillwithus.Itwentthroughafewincarnationsbutwhenyoulookatittoday,wearestillcategorizingcertainspeciesdeservingofprotection.Mostoftheconventionsdo.Youaredividinganimalsandplantsinsteadoftakingthebroadapproachofprotectinghabitats,theecosystems.”
Theabove–mentionedsystemofnegativelists(CITEScallsthem‘Appendices’)providedthe
firstboneofcontentionduringthedraftingprocessofCITES.TheIUCNhadsuggestedthat
wildlifetradeshouldbecontrolledorbannedonthebasisofgloballistsofthreatenedspecies
tobedrawnandupdateduponadvicebyaninternationalcommitteeofexperts.Acoalitionof
countriesfromtheGlobalSouthwasinfavourofrangestatesdeterminingtheirlistsof
tradablespecies.TheUSsupportedthebidtherebypavingthewayfortheWashington
Conference,whichledtothecreationofCITES(Sand1997:20).ThecoreapproachofCITESis
tosubjectallwildlifeimportstomandatorylicensingwithpermitsissuedbytheexporting
countriesonthebasisofanagreednegativelisting(Sand1997:20).Twenty-onestatessigned
theConventioninitially,whichhadplaced1100speciesontheappendices(seebelow).The
underlyingphilosophywasthatinternationalcooperationwouldpreventinternationaltrade
causingspeciesextinction,asstatedinthepreambleoftheConvention(CITES1973):
227
“Internationalcooperationisessentialfortheprotectionofcertainspeciesofwildfaunaand
floraagainstover-exploitationthroughinternationaltrade”.
Inessence,CITESaccordsprotectiontoabout35000animalandplantspecies,whichare
includedinthethreeAppendices.Speciesareconsideredforinclusioninordeletionfromthe
AppendicesattheConferenceofParties(CoP),heldeverythreeyears.AppendixIprovidesa
listofspeciesthreatenedwithextinctionandthuscommercialtradeinwild-caughtspecimens
ofthesespeciesisillegal(CITES2002).278TheScientificAuthority(afurtherrequirementof
CITES)279oftheexportingcountrymustissueanon-detrimentfinding,assuringthatsuch
exportwouldnotadverselyaffectthewildpopulation.Anyformoftradeinthesespecies
requiresexportandimportpermits.TheManagementAuthorityoftheexportingstateis
expectedtocheckthatanimportpermithasbeensecuredandthattheimportingstateis
capableofprovidingadequatecareforthespecimen(CITES1973).
SpecieslistedunderAppendixIIarenotnecessarilythreatenedwithextinctionbutmay
becomethreatenedunlesstradeissubjecttostrictregulationtopreventextinctioninthe
wild.Internationaltrademaybeauthorizedbythepresentationandgrantingofanexport
permitorre-exportcertificate.Noimportpermitisnecessaryalthoughsomecountriesmay
requireimportpermitsintermsoftheirownstricterdomesticmeasures.Theexportingstate
hastoissueanon-detrimentfindingandexportpermit.AppendixIIIrelatestospecies,which
werelistedafteronestatepartyaskedotherstatepartiesforassistanceincontrollingtradein
aspecificspecies.Thesespeciesarenotnecessarilythreatenedwithextinctionglobally.Trade
isonlyauthorizedbywayofanappropriateexportpermitandacertificateoforigin(CITES
1973).Table10summarizestheconditionsoftradeinrelationtothedifferentCITES
categoriesofprotection.CITESallowsforsomeroomtomanoeuverwhenitcomestothe
listingofcaseswheretheconservationstatusofaspeciesdiffersacrossitsrange.So–called
‘splitlisting’referstocases“wheredifferentpopulationsorsub-speciesareindifferent278Thetradeofcaptive-bredanimalsorcultivatedplantsofAppendixIspeciesareconsideredAppendixIIspecimenswiththeconcomitantrequirements(CITES2002).Inotherwords,so-calledAppendixIspeciescanbetradediftheydonotderivefromwildpopulations.279AccordingtoArticleIX,signatorieshavetodesignateoneoformoreManagementAuthoritiesinchargeofadministeringthelicensingsystem,andoneormoreScientificAuthoritiestoadviseCITESontheeffectsofinternationaltradeonCITES-listedspecies(CITES1973).
228
Appendicesandwhereapopulation(orsub-species)maybelistedandanothermaynot”
(Willock2004:15).Rhinosareanexampleofsuchasplit-listing,aswhiterhinosinSouth
AfricaandSwazilandweremovedtoAppendixII(moredetailswillbeprovidedlaterinthis
chapter).
Table10:ConditionsoftradeundertheAppendicesI,IIandIIIofCITES
Appendix Permitconditions ExportPermit
required?
Re–export
certificaterequired?
Importpermit
required?
Non–detriment
findingrequired?
I Notforcommercial
trade;tradenot
detrimentaltothe
species;tradeis
legal;avoidscruelor
injuriousshippingof
livespecimens
Yes(grantedonlyif
importpermit
alreadyinhand)
Yes(grantedonlyif
inaccordancewith
CITESandthereisa
validimportpermit)
Yes Yes
II Tradenot
detrimentaltothe
species;Tradeis
legal;avoidscruelor
injuriousshippingof
livespecimens
Yes Yes(grantedonlyin
accordancewith
CITES)
No(unlessrequired
undernationallaw)
Yes
III
(iftradeoriginates
withlistingparty)
Tradeislegaland
avoidscruelor
injuriousshippingof
livespecimens
Yes Notapplicable No(unlessrequired
undernationallaw)
No
III
(iftradedoesnot
originatewithlisting
party)
Tradeislegaland
avoidscruelor
injuriousshippingof
livespecimens
No(certificateof
originonly)
No(certificateof
originonly)
No(unlessrequired
undernationallaw)
No
Source:adaptedfrom:Clarke(2004:11)
Despitethenobleintentions,theinitialsignatoriesoftheConventionhadlittleinformationon
thescaleoftheproblemandhowtooperatetradecontrols(Huxley2000:8).Oryx(citedby:
Huxley2000:)observed,“…whenCITESwasoriginallysetupandsigned,fewadministrators
realizedthatmorethanahandfulofspecieswereinvolved”.Inaddition,fewcountrieshad
experienceinhandlingtradecontrolsofthetypesetoutintheCITES.Thelackof
understandingofhowtooperatethesystemoftraderegulationshaspersistedovertheyears,
andcontinuestoposeproblemsattheConferencesofParties(CoPs).Duringtheearlyyears,it
229
wasrealizedthatthetreatyneededagreatdealofinterpretationandfine-tuningifitwereto
workeffectively.Moreover,acentralissuewasthecriteriatobeusedforincludingspeciesin
theAppendices.TheWashingtonConferencehadneglectedtoestablishsuchcriteria.Itwas
onlyatthefirstConferenceofthePartiesin1976thatexplicitcriteriawereformulated.
However,manystateswerenothappywiththecriteria,andtheyremainacontestedissuein
thepresentcontext(Huxley,2000:8).
AlthoughCITESissupposedtobelegallybinding,itistheprerogativeofindividualstatesto
domesticateandimplementwildlifetraderegulationsatthelocallevel.Asisthecasewith
mostotherinternationalconventions,thereislittlerecoursetodealingwithinfractionsor
non-compliancebywayofinternationalenforcement.Infractionsmayincludenegligencewith
regardstotheissuingofpermits,excessivetrade,laxenforcementorfailuretoproduce
annualreports.Wheninformedofaninfraction,theSecretariatisrequiredtonotifyallother
StateParties.Theoffendingpartyisgiventimetorespondtotheallegationsandmaybe
providedwithtechnicalassistancetopreventfurtherinfractions(CITES1973).280Thereare
180partiestoCITESasofNovember2014,includingalltherhinorange,transferand
consumercountries.281SouthAfricaratifiedtheConventionon15July1975,renderingitone
oftheConvention’searliestsignatories.AstheConventionentersitsforty-firstyearofcoming
intoforce,thepolitical,social,economicandenvironmentaldimensionsofthemodernworld
havechangedsinceitsinception.ItisnoteworthythattheapartheidregimegaveCITESthe
stampofapproval.Moreover,someconsumercountriessuchasCambodia,Laos,Myanmar,
Taiwan,VietnamandYemenonlyjoinedCITESmorethan20yearsaftertheConvention
enteredintoforce,allowingamassivewindowforuncontrolledinternationaltradeinwildlife
intheinterimperiod(seeTable11).Asof2015,theremainingAfricanrhinorangestatesare
Botswana,Kenya,Malawi,Namibia,SouthAfrica,Swaziland,Tanzania,Uganda,Zambia,and
Zimbabwe.ThefollowingsectionswilldiscusstheConvention’slimitedsuccessincurbing
280TheSecretariatmayalsorulethatallpermitsaretobeconfirmedbytheSecretariat,itmaysuspendcooperation,issueaformalwarning,visitthecountrytoverifycapacityorrecommendthesuspensionofCITES-relatedtrade,whichwillonlyberesumedoncecorrectivemeasureshavebeenimplementedbytheoffendingParty(CITES1973).281SouthernSudan,theneweststateistheonlycountryinAfricanottohavejoinedCITES.Angolaaccededon31December2013(CITES2014b).
230
exploitativewildlifetrade,lackofacceptanceandlegitimacyandhowthismayhaveaffected
illegalmarketflows.
Whilecivilsocietyorganizationsmightlobbygovernmentregardingtheratificationand
implementationofspecificinternationalconventions(suchastheRomeStatute),
governmentsdonotusuallyconsultaffectedconstituentsonthevirtuesandfailingsof
becomingapartytoaninternationaltreaty.Asaconsequence,localconstituentsmayregard
internationalconventionsas‘alienimplants’whichlacklegitimacyandacceptanceatthelocal
level.Accordingtoaformergovernmentofficial,internationalinstrumentsareroutinely
signedoffinsouthernAfrica,oftencontingentonwhetherthereareperceivedbenefitstothe
signatory,orbecauseotherstatesorinstitutionsapplysomeformofthe‘carrotandstick’
principletogarnerbroad-basedascensionorratification.Insomeinstances,such
internationalinstrumentstravelnofurtherthantheinitialsignature(Interviewwith
governmentofficial6,2013).Inlightofthemanyconventionsandinitiativesincirculation,itis
perhapsnotsurprisingthatpoliticianshavetoprioritizeamongstavastpoolofoptions.
DomestificationofCITEShasbeenriddledwithproblemsandshortcomings,whichrelateto
thecontentsandobjectivesoftheConvention,enforcementmechanismsanditslegitimacyat
thelocallevel,particularlyintheGlobalSouth.
Table11:Whendidrhinorange,transitandconsumerstatesjoinCITES?
Nameofcountry Relevancetorhinos Date1 Date2
Angola FR&T 02/10/2013(A) 31/12/2013
Botswana R&T 14/11/1977(A) 12/02/1978
Cambodia FR&T&C 04/07/1997(R) 02/10/1997
China FR&T&C 08/01/1981(A) 08/04/1981
CzechRepublic T&C 14/04/1993(S) 01/01/1993
DRCongo FR&T 20/07/1976(A) 18/10/1976
Ethiopia FR&T 05/04/1989(A) 04/07/1989
Germany T 22/03/1976(R) 20/06/1976
India R&T 20/07/1976(R) 18/10/1976
Indonesia R&T 28/12/1976(A) 28/03/1979
Ireland T 08/01/2002(R) 08/04/2002
Japan C 06/08/1980(Ac) 04/11/1980
Kenya R&T 13/12/1978(R) 13/03/1979
Laos T&C 01/03/2004(A) 30/05/2004
Lesotho T 01/10/2003(R) 30/12/2003
231
Malawi R 05/02/1982(A) 06/05/1982
Malaysia R&T 20/10/1977(A) 18/01/1978
Mozambique FR&T 25/03/1981(A) 23/06/1981
Myanmar R&T&C 13/06/1997(A) 11/09/1997
Namibia R&T 18/12/1990(A) 18/03/1991
Nepal R&T 18/06/1975(A) 16/09/1975
Netherlands T 19/04/1984(R) 18/07/1984
Nigeria T 09/05/1974(R) 01/07/1975
Pakistan R 20/04/1976(A) 19/07/1976
Poland T 12/12/1989(R) 12/03/1990
Qatar T&C 08/05/2001(A) 12/03/1990
Singapore T 30/11/1986(A) 28/02/1987
SouthAfrica R 15/07/1975(R) 13/10/1975
Swaziland R&T 26/02/1997(A) 27/05/1997
Tanzania R&T 29/11/1979(R) 27/02/1980
Thailand T&C 21/01/1983(R) 21/04/1983
Uganda R 18/07/1991(A) 16/10/1991
UnitedArabEmirates T&C 08/02/1990(A) 09/05/1990
UnitedKingdom T 02/08/1976(R) 31/10/1976
UnitedStates T 14/01/1974(R) 01/07/1975
Vietnam FR&T&C 20/01/1994(A) 20/04/1994
Yemen C 05/05/1997(A) 03/08/1997
Zambia R&T 24/11/1980(A) 22/02/1981
Zimbabwe R&T 19/05/1981(A) 17/08/1981
Source:extractedfromCITES(2014b)282
Date1: (A)Accession Date2:Dateofentryintoforce Relevancetorhinos: (Ap)Approval (R)RangeState (C)Continuation (FR)FormerRangeState (R)Ratification (T)TransitState (S)Succession (C)ConsumerState
Chapter3dealtwiththelonghistoryofrhinohorndemand.Thetotalnumberofrhinosinthe
1970sand1980sbestdemonstratesthegravityofthesituationinAfricaatthetime.TheIUCN
estimatedthat8,458whiteandblackrhinossurvivedby1990(Cumming/duToit/Stuart1990:
10).ItisthusnotsurprisingthatCITEShasengagedwiththerhinoissuesinceitsearlydays.
282Rhinohornsoriginatingfromtheftsoutofmuseumsandprivatecollectionsincountriesoutsidethetraditionalrangestateswerenotincludedinthistable.Thecategorizationofcountriesisbasedoncurrentdatacollectedbytheauthor.
232
WhenCITESenteredintoforcein1975,rhinosandtheirproductswereamongthefirst
speciestobeplacedinAppendicesIandII.AllrhinospecieswereplacedinAppendixIin
1977,effectivelybanninginternationaltradeexceptunderexceptionalcircumstances
(Milliken/Shaw2012:44).Despitethetradeban,thenumberofblackrhinoscontinuedto
plummet,andrhinosbecamelocallyextinctinatleast18rangestatesinAfricaoverthenext
twodecades(Leader-Williams2003:92).ThefailureoftheAppendixIlistingprompted
furtheraction.Resolution3.11of1981calledonstatesthatwerenotpartiestoCITES(Taiwan
andYemenweremajorconsumernationsandnotpartiestoCITESatthetime)totake
preventativemeasurestocurbillegaltrade.Moreover,theResolutioncalledforamoratorium
onthesaleofallgovernmentandpara-statalstocksofrhinohornaswellasthemandatory
annualreportingofhornassetstotheConvention(IUCN2000:47).Thepassiveoppositionof
consumercountries(byinitiallynotjoiningCITES)constitutesasignificanthurdleto
legitimizingandimplementingthetradeban.Essentially,thetradeandconsumptionofrhino
hornwerelegaluntilconsumercountriesascendedtoorratifiedCITES,anddomesticated
localprohibition.
Atthe6thConferenceofPartiesinOttawa,Canada,itwasnotedthattheblackrhino
continuedto“declinecatastrophically”(Wijnsteker2003:198)andthusResolution6.10of
1987calledforimmediate,drasticandevenstrictermeasurestobetakentostoptheillegal
cross-bordertradeinrhinohorn.Alldomesticandinternationaltradewasprohibitedwiththe
exceptionofthemovementofnon-commercialhuntingtrophiesthatneededrequisiteCITES
documentation.Moreover,governmentswereagainurgedtodestroyallgovernmentand
para-statalstocksofrhinohorn(inreturntheywouldbecompensatedwithexternalaidto
assistinrhinoconservation–ostensiblythesefundswouldbemadeavailablebymember
statesfromtheGlobalNorth).Lawenforcementagencieswereinstructedtobeparticularly
alerttothetraffickingofrhinohorn.Partieswereaskedtoincreasepenaltiesforindividual
andcorporateoffendersinvolvedincross-borderpoachingandtraffickingofhorn.Those
countriesthatignoredtheearlierresolutionweresupposedtobepressurizedbywayof
economic,politicalanddiplomaticsanctions(Leader-Williams2003:92–94).Althoughthe
resolutioncharterednewterritorybygoingbeyondtheremitoftraderegulations,thesuccess
wasagainlimited.Manystatesdidnotdestroytheirrhinohornstockpilesnorwasthe
promisedcompensationtopromotethedestructionofstockpilesforthcoming(IUCN2000:
233
47).Inaddition,severalkeyconsumernations283failedtoimplementdomesticlawstocurb
theillegaltrade(Leader-Williams2003:94).ItbearsmentioningthatSouthAfricaallowedthe
exportofwhiterhinotrophiessince1979(Milliken/Shaw2012:44).SouthAfricawassubject
tointernationalsanctionsduetoherracistapartheidregimeduringthefirst20yearsofCITES.
Sincetheadventofdemocracyin1994,theSouthAfricanwildlifehuntingindustryhas
experiencedamassiveboomandbecameatopdestinationfor‘BigFive’hunting(Interview
withJournalist1),284includingtherhino(seealsoChapter4).
Overthecourseofthenextfiveyears,thegovernmentsofSouthAfrica,Namibiaand
Zimbabwebegantoexpresstheirdisenchantmentwiththeinternationalbanonthetradein
rhinoproducts,andproposalsforacontrolledlegaltradeweremade.Allthreecountriesheld
considerablestocksofhornattainedthroughthecollectionofhornfromnaturalmortalities
andconfiscations,andinthecaseofNamibiaandZimbabwethroughdehorningofanimals,
undertakenasaprotectivemeasure(Leader-Williams2003:94).Forallintentsandpurposes,
thisconstitutesthefirstcontestationofillegality(againsttheCITEStradeban)withregardsto
thetradeinrhinohorn.Inotherwords,thedisillusionmentofthethreesouthernAfrican
countriesconstitutesaformofcontestedillegalityatthemacrolevel,whichwasgoingto
influencefuturepolicydirectionsonthematter.Proposalstodown-listrhinosfromAppendixI
toAppendixIIwererejectedattheCoPsin1992and1994.285The9thCoPinFortLauderdale
hadtakenplaceonlysixmonthsaftertheelectionofthefirstdemocraticgovernmentinSouth
Africain1994.SouthAfrica’squestforacontrolledtradecontinuedandinrecognitionofthe
country’ssuccessinrhinoconservationandmanagement,thepopulationsofwhiterhino
weremovedtoAppendixIIin1994.Anannotationconfinedthepermissibletradetolive
rhinosto“acceptableandappropriatedestinationsandhuntingtrophiesonly”(CITES1994).
Swaziland’swhiterhinopopulationwasalsograntedAppendixIIstatusin2004,tiedtoa
283China,SouthKorea,TaiwanandYemen284Originallytheterm‘BigFive’wasahuntingterm,whichhasbeenadoptedintocommonparlance.The‘BigFive’refertofiveofAfrica’sgreatwildanimals:theAfricanlion,Africanelephant,Capebuffalo,Africanleopardandthewhiteorblackrhino.285OutsidetheconfinesofCITES,theUSthreatenedChina,SouthKorea,TaiwanandYemenwiththesuspensionofanywildlifeandfisheriestradeunderthePellyAmendment(USdomesticlegislationgoverningwildlifeandfisheriestrade).Thecountriesleaptintoactionbypassingsomedomesticlawsandintensifyingeffortstocurbillicittrade(Leader-Williams2003:94).
234
partialannotationforlivesalesandhuntingtrophiesonlyandsubjecttoquotassetas
percentagesofthetotalrhinonumbers(Milliken/Shaw2012:44).AtthesameConferenceof
Parties,Resolution9.14waspassed,whichrepealedtheearliertworesolutions.The
resolutionurged,amongstothers,thosepartieswithlegalstockstoidentify,mark,register
andsecureallsuchstockandtoimplementadequatelegislationincludingdomestictrade
restrictions.286SouthAfricaagainpushedforacontrolledtradeofbothwhiteandblackrhino
speciesatthenextConferenceofPartiesin1997.Bythatstage,SouthAfricawasconserving
some70%to80%oftheworld’srhinos(Leader-Williams2003:96).Thecountryalso
proposedtochangetheAppendixIIannotationtoallowfortradeinrhinopartsand
derivatives(asopposedtothe1994listingwhichonlyallowedtradeinliverhinosandhunting
trophies).Stateofficialsexpressedconcernabouttheincentivesforrhinoconservation,
especiallyforprivaterhinoowners,whoconservedsome15%ofSouthAfrica’srhinosatthe
time.Theproposalwasrejected,astheEuropeanUnion(EU)andtheUnitedStates(US)did
notsupporttheproposal(theEUholdsconsiderableswayatCITESasitsmembercountries
tendtovoteasablock).WhiletheEUdeemedtheproposalprematureasnoadequatetrade
controlmechanismshadbeenputinplace,theUSindicatedthattheamendmentwould
undermineprogresstocurbthedemandforrhinohorninconsumernations(Departmentof
EnvironmentalAffairs2012).
Afterthe1997rejectionatCITESandinlightofitsacceptanceintoregionalbodies,South
AfricagotincreasinglyinvolvedwithrelevantSouthernAfricanDevelopmentCommunity
(SADC)initiatives.287ASADCCoPpreparatorymeetingaheadoftheConferenceofPartiesin
2000recommendedthatacomprehensivetradesystembedevelopedbeforeaproposalwas
submittedattheCoP(DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs2012).NamibiaandSouthAfrica
weregrantedanannualexportquotaoffivehuntingtrophiesofadultmaleblackrhinosatthe
13thConferenceofPartiesin2004(CITES2004).SaysaSouthAfricanexpert(Interviewwith
Conservator7):
286Reeves(2002:189–200)providesafascinatingaccountofthepoliticalmanoeuvringbehindthescenesatCITESintherunuptotheCoPsin1992and1994.287SouthAfricajoinedSADCaftertheapartheidsystemwasabolishedin1994.
235
“In’97weaskedagainfortradeandlostwithoneortwovotes,thenweleftitandconcentratedonourelephants.From2000,elephantswerekeyatCoP12and13,andafterCoP14wecouldtradeinivory,andthenatCoP15wedidn'ttakeanyproposalsbecauseTanzaniaandZambiatooktheirivoryproposals,soit’snotthatSouthAfricaneveraskedfortradeinrhinohornbefore.”
Thefrequencyofrhinopoachingincreasedduringthe2000s(laterchapterswillarguethatthe
actualnumberofillegalrhinohornsenteringthemarketincreasedmarginallyashornsupplies
derivedfromothersources)andSouthAfricaputthetradeproposalonthebackburneruntil
CoP16heldinBangkok,Thailandin2013.Attheoccasion,EdnaMolewa,theSouthAfrican
MinisterofEnvironmentalAffairsannouncedthatSouthAfricawasconsideringproposalsto
seeklegalizationoftradeinrhinohornattheCoP17tobeheldinSouthAfricain2016.
Molewa(quotedinSmith2013)explainedtheposition:
"Ourrhinosarekilledeverydayandthenumbersaregoingup.Therealityisthatwehavedoneallinourpoweranddoingthesamethingeverydayisn'tworking.Wedothinkthatweneedtoaddressthisissueoftradeinacontrolledmannersothatwecanatleastbegintopushdownthispressure."
TherhinoissueatCITEScannotbeseparatedfromparallelprocessesanddebateshappening
atCITESbecausetheyillustratethepolarizationatCITES.Thenorth-southdivide288andthe
perceivedpoliticizationofCITESbecameincreasinglyevidentwhentheAfricanelephantwas
‘uplisted’(movedfromAppendixIItoAppendixI)andthetradebanofivoryproductsentered
intoforcein1989.Theproposalforthecompletebanwasbasedonrecommendationsfrom
theCITESElephantWorkingGroupandastudyundertakenbythespeciallyconvenedIvory
TradeReviewGroup.Thegroupfoundthatneitherthequotamanagementsystemnoranyof
theearlierCITESresolutionshadstemmedthetideagainstillegalpoachingofelephantsand
tradeinivory(‘tSas-Rolfes2000:75).Intherun-uptotheban,WesternconservationNGOs
hadcampaignedinfavourofprohibition.TheCITESproposalwasadopteddespiteobjections
from9southernAfricanelephantrangestates,andJapanandChina.Backthenthepopulation
ofelephantswasconsideredstableorrisinginBotswanaandZimbabwe.Insomerange
states,notablyKenyaandZimbabwe,expandingelephantpopulationsweredestroyingthe
288ThetermisusedwithreservationassomestatesintheGlobalSouth(notablyKenya)havealignedthemselveswiththeanti-sustainableusefaction,whichislargelylinkedtocountriesandconservationNGOsintheGlobalNorth.
236
farmingoperationsofruralfarmers(‘tSas-Rolfes2000:77).Zimbabwebecameparticularly
vocalafterseveralattemptstodown-listelephantswererejectedatsubsequentCoPsdespite
thegrowthofitsherdsandcompetentconservationmanagementprinciplesbeingapplied.
MattersclimaxedwhenagroupofsouthernAfricancountriesthreatenedtowithdrawfrom
CITESatthe8thConferenceofPartiesheldinKyoto.ThesouthernAfricanfactionfeltthat
CITESlistingswereincreasinglyusedforpoliticalpurposes,andlistingdecisionswerenot
basedonsoundscientificdata.289
Thedisputedelephantlistingtriggeredalargerdebateoverwhichconservationparadigmsthe
CITESregimeshouldemploy:thesustainableuseparadigmwaspittedagainstthe
preservationparadigm(Mofson2000:111).ThesouthernAfricanfactionadvocatedthe
sustainableuseofwildlifeasaconservationtool.Bywayofbackground:Itisimportantto
notethatCITEStendstofocusonthegloballevelofimperilmentofaspecieswhen
determiningitslisting.Inessence:regardlessofitsstatusinindividualrangestates,ifa
speciesisdeemedasendangeredatthegloballevel,thenitstrademaybebanned.Through
thisapproach,CITEStreatsnaturalresourceswithinindividualcountriesaspartoftheglobal
commons(Castley/Hall-Martin2003:129).Whenitcomestoshoulderingthecostsof
conservationoflistedspeciesinindividualcountries,nostatecarriesthefinancial
responsibilityforthecosts(financial,administrativeandhumanresources)itmaybeplacing
onanotherstate(Martin2000:131).Inotherwords,therangestatesthemselveshaveto
carrythecostsattachedtothelistingandattemptsatde-listingofaspecies.290Thelisting
processhasbeensubjecttoscathingcriticismbycountriesaffectedbylistingdecisions.
Westernexperts,scientistsandlobbyistsareseenasthemaincatalystsbehindthelistingof
threatenedspecies.Broadconsultationwithcommunitiesthatareaffectedbysuchlistingsis
perceivedtobelacking(InterviewswithConservator3&4,2013).Witheveryadditional
listingorannotation,theConventionbecomesmorecomplex,difficultandexpensiveto
289Inresponsetothecontestedelephantissue,ZimbabweanditspartnersfromtheSouthernAfricanCentreforIvoryMarketing(SACIM)submittedaproposaltolistthenorthernAtlanticherringinAppendixI.TheherringwaschosenbecauseitwasanimportantcommercialcommodityformanyEuropeancountries,justastheelephantwasformanyAfricanrangestates.Theproposalwaswithdrawnduetoweaksupportingdata(Mofson2000:110).290Mozambique’sexperiencewithattemptsatgettingcrocodilesdelistedisinstructive.ThesouthernAfricannationwasrequiredtospendagreatdealofmoneytoprovethataspecieslocallyconsideredapestwasnotendangeredinordertotradecrocodileskinsfromabundantpopulations(Huxley2000:9).
237
operate–andnotonlytocountrieslocatedintheGlobalSouth(Huxley2000:9).Moreover,
whileanobjectivescientificassessmentmighttreatallspeciesthreatenedbyexploitative
tradewithequalseriousness,inpracticenotallspeciesaretreatedthesame.Duetocultural,
political,economicandaestheticreasons,somespecieshavebeenaffordedgreater
importance.CITESappearstoprivilegeanimalsoverplants,andcertainspeciesthathave
beendubbed“charismaticmegafauna”(Dickson2003:24).Therhinofallsintothiscategory
(elephantsandtigersareotherdominantrepresentativesofthistypeofanimal).Whilethe
appropriationofcharismaticmegafaunamaybelegitimatefortheattainmentof
conservationistobjectives,conservationNGOshavebeenusingtheconventionasafund-
raisingtool.Thetypicaltrajectorywouldincorporatethedeclarationofacrisis,themounting
ofacampaigncoupledwithfundraisingto“save”thespecies.Theprocessculminateswith
thespeciesgettinglistedonAppendixI,andtheNGOs’coffersfilledwithdonormonies
(Huxley2000:10).
Inaddition,theconservationideologyunderpinningtheCITESregimeinitsearlydays
excludedthepossibilitythattrademayholdbenefitsforspecies,ecosystemsorpeople
(Martin2000:129).Whiletrademightbetheprincipalthreattothesurvivalofspecies,trade
regulationsmaybeinappropriateindealingwiththreatssuchashumanencroachment,
climatechangeororganizedcrime.Itwasassumedthattraderegulationconstitutedthemost
effectivewayofachievingconservationistgoals(Dickson2003:26).Moreover,listingsdonot
onlyaffectthewildfaunaandflorathatCITESseekstoprotectbutalsothepeoplethatlivein
closeproximitytothem.Theseruralpeopleoftenekeoutalivingfromharvestingortrading
inwildanimalsorplants.Fromonedaytothenext,aformerharvestermaybelabelleda
poacherorcriminal.Asaconsequence,therewerecallsthatCITESshouldconsidertheplight
ofruralpeoplewhenpassingmeasuresthataffecttheirlivelihoods(Dickson2003:23).
In1992,CITESrecognizedwithResolution8.3thatthemajorityofspeciesitsoughttoprotect
werelocatedintheGlobalSouth.Italsoacknowledgedthatthesustainableuseofwildfauna
andflora,irrespectiveofbeingconsumptiveornon-consumptive,providedaneconomically
viableoption(CITES1992).Moreover,itwasacceptedthatunlessconservationprogrammes
tookintoaccounttheneedsoflocalpeople,andprovidedincentivesforsustainableuseof
wildfaunaandflora,conversiontoalternateformsoflandusemightoccur(Wijnsteker2003:
238
59).Tothisday,theissueofsustainableuseconstitutesahighlycontentiousissueatCITES
CoPs.Thereisasignificantlobbywithintheenvironmentalmovement(predominantlylocated
intheGlobalNorthwithstrategicpartnersandofficeslocatedaroundtheglobe)thatis
vehementlyopposedtoanytradeinanimalspecies,particularlywhenitispremisedonthe
killingoftheseanimals(Dickson2003:24).ThislobbyholdsconsiderableswayatCITES,
directlyandindirectlyaffectingregulationsthatleadtorestrictionsontradeinwildlife.Some
southerncountriesobjecttothestronginfluenceofanimalrightsandconservationNGOsat
CITES,portrayingtheanti-usestanceas“anillegitimateimpositionofspecificmoralvalueson
thewiderconservationcommunity”especiallysincethesustainableuseofwildlifeisseenasa
meanstoupliftruralcommunities(Dickson2003:24–25).Despitetheapparentconflict
betweenconservationprinciplesasenvisagedintheoriginalconventionandnotionsof
sustainableuseanddevelopment,CITEShasacknowledgeddevelopmentalconcernsofthe
custodiansofmostoftheremainingbiodiversityintheGlobalSouthinitsstrategicplanof
2000:
“TheStrategicPlanconfirmstherecognitionbythepartiesthatsustainabletradeinwildfaunaandfloracanmakeamajorcontributiontosecuringthebroaderandnotincompatibleobjectivesofsustainabledevelopmentandbiodiversityconservation(CITESSecretariatquotedin:Dickson2003:25).”
Whathasbeendeemeda“somewhatopaqueendorsementoftherelevanceofsustainable
development”(Dickson2003:25)clearedthepathforcountriesoftheGlobalSouthtoinsist
thatdevelopmentalconcernsshouldbeconsideredinfutureformulationsofwildlifepolicies.
Atthe16thCoP,CITESextendedthevalidityoftheStrategicVisionandActionPlanto2020.In
asignificantmovetobroadenitsrepertoire,appealandimpact,CITESapprovedanew
frameworkforfuturepolicydevelopment.Theframeworkincorporatesnewgoalsand
objectives.TheinternationalbodyaspirestocontributetotheattainmentoftheUN
MillenniumDevelopmentGoalsrelevanttoCITES,the‘StrategicPlanforBiodiversity2011–
2020’,theAichiBiodiversityTargetsandtotheimplementationofrelevantoutcomesofthe
UnitedNationsConferenceonSustainableDevelopmentof2012.Andmostsignificantly,the
newframeworkproclaimstoconsider“cultural,socialandeconomicfactorsatplayin
producerandconsumercountries”,promote“transparencyandwiderinvolvementofcivil
societyinthedevelopmentofconservationpoliciesandpractices”andensure“thata
239
coherentandinternationallyagreedapproachbasedonscientificevidenceistakentoaddress
anyspeciesofwildfaunaandflorasubjecttounsustainableinternationaltrade”(CITES2013a:
2).ThesuggestedinstitutionalchangeisreflectedinthenewCITESvisionstatement:
“Conservebiodiversityandcontributetoitssustainableusebyensuringthatnospeciesofwildfaunaorflorabecomesorremainssubjecttounsustainableexploitationthroughinternationaltrade,therebycontributingtothesignificantreductionoftherateofbiodiversitylossandmakingasignificantcontributiontowardsachievingtherelevantAichiBiodiversityTargets.”(CITES2013a:2)
WhetherthechosenpathwillcausemoredivisionamongstpartiesatCITESorassistCITESin
regainingcredibilityandlegitimacyamongstdisgruntledpartiesisamatteroffutureanalysis.
However,datacollectedpriorandduringthecourseofthisprojectrevealedsentimentsthat
reflectednegativelyonCITES,theAppendicesandtheperceivedinfluenceofWestern
conservationNGOsandtheanimalrightsmovementwhereaslocal(African)environmental
justicemovementshadnoorlittlerepresentationatCoPs.FallingshortofcallingCITESaneo–
colonialinstitution,governmentofficialsfromtheSADCregioninterviewedforaprojecton
organizedcrimetrendsinsouthernAfricaportrayedCITESasaninstrumentthatwas
developedandsponsoredbycountriesoftheGlobalNorth.ItisseentoreflectWestern
conservationphilosophiesandanimalrightsethicswhilepaying“littleconcerntotheplightof
Africanruralpeopleandtheirdevelopmentalconcerns”(InstituteforSecurityStudies2009–
2010).Officialsalsopointedtotheuncontrolled“slaughterofwildanimals”duringthe
colonialperiod,questioningwhythenorthernrelativesofthosecolonialhuntersshouldhave
anysayinAfricanconservationmatters.ThequestionaroseofwhyAfricansshouldpreserve
Western-stylesafariparksfilledwithwildanimalswhenEuropeancountrieshadfailedso
dismallyinconservingtheirownwildernessareas.Whilethenorthernlobbywasquickto
criticizeanddeterminethewayforward,theyfailedto“puttheirmoneywheretheremouth
is”intermsofpayingcompensationandimplementationofrules(Interviews,2013).The
perceptionthatnortherncountriesholdswayatCITESissupportedbyvotingpatternsatCoPs
(EUmemberstatesusuallyvoteasablock).Duringinterviewsforthecurrentproject,
conservatorsandprivaterhinoownerssharedthesesentiments.ASouthAfricanlaw
enforcementofficialsaid(Interviewwithlawenforcer3):
240
“Itiscrazythattheseoldcolonialinstitutionsarestillinplace.CITESdecideshowmuchandwhatwecansell.Westockabout90%oftheworld’srhinos.Sowhoaretheytoprescribetous?Imeanweareinacontrolledarea,wherewemanagestock.Weknowwhatwearedoingandwearetryingtoprotectthemforourchildren.”
Thesignificanceofperceptionsliketheoneexpressedinthecitationabove,ishowtheyaffect
thediffusionandacceptanceofCITESatthelocallevel.Aswillbeshowninsubsequent
sectionsandchapters,localregulationssuchastheThreatenedofProtectedSpecies(TOPS)
regulationsandthemoratoriumonthedomestictradeinrhinohornlacksupportand
legitimacyamongstkeyconstituenciesinSouthAfrica.Inessence,theperceivedunfairnessof
CITESasaninternationalinstrumentthatimpactsnationaltradeaspirationsalsoaffectsthe
legitimacyofdomesticlaws,ordinancesandregulationsinSouthAfricaandotherrange,
transferandconsumercountries.Thepoliticizationandinfluenceofnortherncountriesat
CITESexplainsinpartwhyrepresentativesofcountriesintheGlobalSouthmusterlimited
politicalwilltoimplementCITESdecisionsandregulations.Moreover,thenormativeagenda
ofCITESemulatestheearlierdiscussedconservationparadigms,whichtendtoemphasizethe
irreconcilabilitybetweenlocalpeople,conservationandwildanimals.Inlightofthe
controversysurroundingCITES,itisnotsurprisingthattheinternationalpoliticalprotection
regimehashadlimitedsuccessindisruptingtransnationalflowsofrhinohorn.
5.3Theinternationalresponse
Theprevioussectionalludedtotheperceptionofunfairnesswhenitcomestolistingdecisions
(illegalization)andshoulderingthecostimplicationsofsuchlistings.Thissectionprovidesa
briefoverviewoftheroleoftheinternationalcommunityinrhinoprotectionintheformof
politicalresponsesandtheirimpact.Animportantaspectoftheinternationalresponserelates
tothelegislativeandenforcementeffortsintransitandconsumercountries.Reprimandsand
thethreatofsanctionsonpartofCITES,aswellaspressurebytheUS(thePellyAmendment),
ledtolimitedactionbythemajorrhinohornconsumercountriesofthe1970sand1980s.
241
China291,SouthKorea292,Taiwan293andYemen294joinedCITES(seeTable11)andpassed
sufficientdomesticlegislation(atthetime)toavertsanctionsandafalloutwiththeCITES
StandingCommittee.
SouthAfricaiscurrentlytheprincipalsupplierofillegalrhinohornthroughpoachingand
pseudo-hunting;however,organizedcrimenetworkshaveengagedinfrauds,burglariesand
robberiesacrosstheworld.Aswillbeshowninlaterchapters,theillicitsupplychainofrhino
horninvolvesnationalitiesfromacrosstheglobe.295Sellar(2014a)arguesthatwhileSouth
Africahasbeenpullingitsweightincurbingpoachingandillegaltrade,transitandconsumer
countrieshavebeenlaggingfarbehind.Interviewswithlawenforcerandconservatorsecho
Sellar’ssentimentsonthedisconnectbetweentheinternationalbanasenvisagedbyCITES,
andpracticalsupportforitsimplementationintransitandconsumercountries.Sellarwho
headedtheCITESlawenforcementarmcommentsonthelacklustrefollowuptoCITES
291ChinajoinedCITESin1981.Thecountrywastheworld’slargestexporterofpatentmedicinescontainingrhinohornandagreedtobanallexportsin1992.Chineseofficialswerenotinfavourofbanningdomestictradeatthetime,claimingthatrhinohornstockhadbeenboughtpriortoChinajoiningCITES.Aspressurewasmounting,theChineseStateCouncilbannedwithimmediateeffectthemanufactureofallmedicinescontainingrhinohornandtigerbones,andalldomesticandinternationaltradeinrhinohorn,tigerpartsandderivatives.Moreover,itbecamemandatorytoregisterallrhinoandtigerstocks,andrhinohornwastakenofftheofficialpharmacopeiain1993(Reeve2006:191).292TheRepublicofKoreaavoidedcertificationbytheUSuponpassingdomesticlegislationandimplementingeffectivemeasurestocurbthesaleofrhinohorn.TheKoreangovernmentpassedadecreein1993thatrenderedthesaleordisplayofrhinohornapunishableoffenceofupto6-monthimprisonmentandafineofUS$1250(whichtranslatedto1millionUS$in2006)(Reeve2006:190–191).293TaiwanbecamethelargestimporterofAfricanandAsianrhinohorninthemid-1980s.Abanontheimportofrhinohornwasinstitutedin1985,butitlackedimplementationandenforcement.DespitetheadoptionoftheWildlifeConservationActin1989,whichhadbannedthesaleanddisplayofrhinohornwithoutaspecialpermitin1989,rhinohornremainedopenlyonsale.DuetoincreasinginternationalpressureandNGOcampaigns,thegovernmentannouncedafullban,theimpositionoffines,andenforcementoftheWildlifeConservationActin1992.TheUSnonethelessimposedsanctions,whichwereonlyliftedin1997,oncetheWildlifeConservationActcompliedwithCITESguidelinesandaspecialinvestigativeunithadbeensetup(Reeve2006:194–196).294YemenonlyjoinedCITESin1997,buttheMinistryofSupplyandTradeissuedadecreeprohibitingtradeinrhinohornthathadnotbeenprocessedintojambiyahandlesby1992.Tradershadtwomonthstoregisterstockofrawrhinohornandanothermonthtohaveitmarkedbeforeallunmarkedstockwastobeconfiscated(Reeve2006:191).295BeyondtheSouthAfricanrhinoharvestingandsmugglingnetworks,Mozambicans,Zimbabwean,Congolese,NamibianandSwazilandnationalshavebeenlinkedtorhinopoachingwhileVietnamese,Laotian,Thai,Chinese,Mozambicansandothersaresmugglingandtraffickingrhinohorn.Thai,Vietnamese,Polish,CzechandUSnationalswereinvolvedinfraudulenthuntingexpeditions,andinternationalorganizedcrimenetworkssuchastheinfamousIrishRoverganghaveransackedprivatecollections,museumsandgalleries.
242
RhinocerosEnforcementTaskForce meetings.TheCITESSecretariatconvenessuchmeetings
atregularintervalswiththeobjectiveofbringingtogetherlawenforcementofficialsfrom
rhinorange,transitandconsumercountriesforthepurposeofsharingintelligenceand
designingresponsestrategies.PursuanttoCoP16,theSecretariatarrangedaCITES
RhinocerosEnforcementTaskForcemeetingintheKenyancapitalofNairobiinOctober2013.
Representativesofwildlifeenforcementnetworksandlawenforcementpersonnelfrom21
countries296attendedthemeeting(CITES2013b).Suchmeetingshelptohighlightcomplex
diversityasto“experience,authority,skillsandresources”oflawenforcementofficialsacross
theworld(Sellar2014b).OneoftheoutcomesofthemeetinginKenyawasthedecisionto
createadirectoryofnationalfocalpoints.Theresultantlistwouldprovidethecontactdetails
ofindividualstaskedwithcoordinatingtheinvestigationofrhinocrimesincountriesacross
theworld(Sellar2014a).Countriesweregivenfourmonths(until28February2014)to
providethecontactdetailsoftheirnationalfocalpointstotheCITESSecretariatfor
disseminationtorelevantlawenforcementbodiesandwildlifeenforcementnetworks
(WENs).ByAugust2014,remindershadtobesentasonlyChinaandGreecehadheededthe
request.Ninestateshaddesignatedandcommunicatedtheirnationalfocalpointsupon
publicationofthenationalfocalpointsinOctober2014.Twooftheninestatesthatcomplied
werenotmembersofthetaskforce(GreeceandJapan).Essentially,14statesdeemedas
rhinosupply,transitorconsumercountriesfailedtocomplywithasimpledirective,including
Vietnamwhichisamajortransitandconsumercountryofrhinohorn(CITES2014a).Sellar’s
comments(2014a)onthisstateofaffairsarepoignant:
“Theremusthavebeentimes,probablymanytimesinrecentyears,whenenforcementofficersinSouthAfricahavefelttheyareengagedinalonebattle.Atleasttheycannowtakecomfortfromthefactthatthereare8countriesouttherereadytobackthemup.Onlyeight?Yes,SouthAfrica’sfocalpoint’sdetailsareinthedirectorysoithastobesubtracted.Intheracetocatchupwithcriminals,ourfeetarenotevenonthestartingblocksyet.”
Notsurprising,membersoftheinternationallawenforcementcommunityhaveexpressed
theirdisenchantmentwiththe‘soft’approachoftheCITESregulatoryframework.Sellar
296Inadditiontoseveralregionalwildlifeandlawenforcementnetworks,Botswana,Cambodia,China,theCzechRepublic,Indonesia,Kenya,theLao'sPeopleDemocraticRepublic,Malawi,Malaysia,Mozambique,Namibia,Nepal,thePhilippines,Poland,SouthAfrica,Thailand,Uganda,theUnitedKingdomofGreatBritainandNorthernIreland,theUnitedStatesofAmerica,VietnamandZambiawererepresentedatthemeeting(CITES2013b).
243
(2014c:7)argues,thistimeonbehalfoftheGlobalInitiativeagainstTransnationalOrganized
Crime:
“AlthoughPartiesarelegallyboundtopenalizeviolationsofCITES,theConventionwasdraftedin1973and,hence,itswordingdoesnotreflecttheexistingsignificantandseriouslevelsofsophisticatedandorganizedtrafficking.Itisacceptable,forinstance,forPartiestorespondtoviolationsbywayofadministrative,asopposedtocriminal,penalties.”
Accordingtothelawenforcementprofessional,theinternationalcommunityshoulddealwith
“environmentalorganizedcrime”intermsoftheUnitedNationsConventionagainst
TransnationalOrganizedCrimeandrequisitedomesticlawsthatdealwithorganizedcrime,
racketeeringorconspiracy.Theinternationallawenforcementcommunityhasputmeasures
intoplacetodealwithwildlifetrafficking(suchastheInternationalConsortiumonCombating
WildlifeCrime(ICCWC)297andtheINTERPOLWildlifeCrimeWorkingGroup);298wildlifecrime
isnonethelessconsideredthe“Cinderellaofcrimes”(Interviewwithlawenforcer8).299Andin
spiteofbeingbrandeda“prioritycrime”byregionalorganizationssuchastheSouthern
AfricanRegionalPoliceChiefsCooperatingOrganisation(SARPCCO)300anddedicatedwildlife
crimelawenforcementregionalnetworkssuchastheAssociationofSoutheastAsianNations
WildlifeEnforcementNetwork(ASEAN-WEN)301andtheLusakaAgreementTaskForce
297TheInternationalConsortiumonCombatingWildlifeCrimeisaninitiativestartedbytheCITESSecretariat,INTERPOL,theUnitedNationsOfficeonDrugsandCrime(UNODC),theWorldBankandtheWorldCustomsOrganization(WCO)tobolsterinternationalcooperationregardingthecombatingofwildlifeandforestcrime.298Therearenumerousotherinternational,regionalandsub-regionalinitiativeswiththeobjectiveoftacklingillegalwildlifetrade.Itisbeyondtheremitofthedissertationtomentionthemall.Afewinitiativeswerechosentoillustratemyargument.Thischoiceshouldnotdetractfromthesignificanceandimpactofotherinitiatives.299Wildlifecrimeisperceivedasa‘soft’crimeamongstmanyactorsinthelawenforcementcommunityandbeyond.Interviewswithlawenforcementofficialsworkinginthefieldofwildlifecrimeinvestigationsrevealedthattheyhadtodealwiththeperceptionthatwildlifecrimeswerelessseriouscrimes.300Formallyestablishedin1996,theSouthernAfricanPoliceChiefsCooperatingOrganization(SARPCCO)isaregionalorganizationofChiefsofPoliceforSADCmemberstates.The15SADCmemberstatesarealsoSARPCCOmemberstates(SARPCCO2014).301TheAssociationofSoutheastAsianNations’WildlifeEnforcementNetwork(ASEAN-WEN)isaregionalintergovernmentallawenforcementnetworkdesignedtocombatwildlifetraffickinginSoutheastAsia.Brunei,Cambodia,Indonesia,Laos,Malaysia,Myanmar,thePhilippines,Singapore,VietnamandThailandaremembercountries(ASEAN-WEN2014).
244
(LATF)302,investigationofwildlifecrimecarrieslessprestigeandstatus,andisevenperceived
asa‘careersideliner’inthesouthernAfricancontext(Interviewswithregionallaw
enforcementofficials,2012and2013).Whilerankedasthe4thmostlucrativeillegalmarketin
theworld,303lawenforcementofficerssecondedtowildlifeinvestigationsareperceivedto
drawtheshorterstrawincomparisontogettingcalleduptointernational,regionaldesksor
unitsthatdealwithdrugmarkets,humanandguntrafficking,orother“hardcrimes”that
have“human”victims(forgettingthattherehavebeendozensofhumanvictims–poaching
suspectsandrangerswhohavebeenkilledinthewildlife‘wars’insouthernAfrica).According
tothiscognitiveframing,wildlifecrimeisperceivedasavictimless(andhencelesser)crime
becauseitdoesnotcausedirectharmtohumans.Theframingomitsthatpoachingandillegal
harvestingofwildlifeharmsapublicgood.304Duetotheinvolvementoftransnational
organizedcrimenetworksinwildlifetraffickingwithlinksto“otherhardcrimes”this
perceptionisstartingtochange,aswellasthehighdeathrateofpoachingsuspectsand
rangerskilledinconservationareas(Interviewwithlawenforcers2,8,10;2013).
Itisbeyondthefocusofthisdissertationtoprovideanoverviewofalltheinitiativesand
campaignsoccurringattheinternationallevel.Sufficetopointoutthattheinternational
communityisgoingthroughthemotionsofsettingupinstitutional,regulatoryandlaw
enforcementinitiativestodealwithwildlifecrimesingeneral,andsomeinitiativesthatare
directedtowardsdisruptingthemarket.Whetherthesemeasuresaccruetonoticeable
302TheLusakaAgreementTaskForceistheenforcementarmofthe‘LusakaAgreementonCo–operativeEnforcementOperationsDirectedatIllegalTradeinWildFaunaandFlora’.TheagreementfollowedworkinggroupmeetingsbetweeneightsouthernandeasternAfricancountries,CITES,Interpol,theUSFish&WildlifeServiceandlawyersoftheFoundationforInternationalEnvironmentLawDevelopmentandformalinter–governmentalnegotiationsundertheauspicesoftheUnitedNationsEnvironmentProgramme(UNEP).TheagreementhasbeencategorizedasaUNtreaty(Environment)andenteredforcein1996.Therearecurrentlysevenpartiestotheagreement:theRepublicofCongo(Brazzaville),Kenya,Lesotho,Liberia,Tanzania,UgandaandZambia.Ethiopia,SouthAfricaandSwazilandaresignatories(LusakaAgreementonCo–operativeEnforcementOperationsDirectedatIllegalTradeinWildFaunaandFlora2014).303Researchreportsoftenciteanannualturnoverof8to10billionUS$inillegalwildlifemarkets,afigureextrapolatedfroma2003mediareport(Colombo6September2003)andinterviewswiththeUSconservationNGOCoalitionagainstWildlifeTrafficking(CAWT)byJeremyHarkenforareportcommissionedbytheUSresearchandadvocacyorganizationGlobalFinancialIntegrity(Harken2011:11).Whilethefigureappearstohavenoscientificbase–andadmittedly,illegalmarketsarenotoriouslydifficulttoquantifyandtheannualturnoverismorethanlikelymuchhigherthanthecitedfigure.Harken’sestimationhasbeenusedwidelytounderlinetheimportanceandserious‘threatlevel’ofwildlifecrime.304Basedondiscussionsandcommentsmadeataworkshopofthe‘illegalmarkets’researchgroupattheMPIfG.
245
changestoactorsontheground–suchasrangersandanti-poachingpersonnel–issubjectof
Chapter7.ThefollowingsectionsexaminethedomesticresponsesinVietnamandSouth
Africa.Thetwocountrieswerechosenduetotheirimportantrolesinillegalmarket
structures.OtherstateresponsessuchasthoseofChinaandMozambiqueareconsideredin
context-specificsectionsofthedissertation.
5.3.1TheVietnameseresponseVietnamflewundertheradardespitebeingatransitandconsumercountryintheearlyyears
ofCITES(InterviewsinVietnam,2013)andlackedadequatelegislationuntilTRAFFIC,
conservationNGOsandtheCITESSecretariatidentifiedthesoutheasternAsiannationasa
majorconsumercountry(seeforexample:Milliken/Shaw2012;CITESSecretariat2013;
Nowell2012b).InJanuary2013,thePrimeMinisterofVietnamissuedDecision11onthe
prohibitionoftheexport,import,sellingandbuyingofspecimensofsomewildanimalspecies
listedundertheAppendicesofCITES.Thisdecisioneffectivelybansalldomesticsalesof
AfricanrhinohorninVietnam.Anexceptionexcludes“importsforthepurposeofdiplomacy,
scientificresearch,biodiversityconservation,displayatzoos,exhibitions,non-profitcircus
performances,lawenforcementandexchangeofspecimensamongstCITESmanagement
authoritiesofmembercountriesarestillallowed”(Vietnam2013).Theexceptionsrelatingto
theimportsofrhinohornforthepurposesofdiplomacyandlawenforcementarerather
curious(someresearchinformantsbelievedthistobeadeliberateloophole),asdata
collectedforthisprojectimplicatesbothdiplomatsandlawenforcementofficialsinthe
smugglingandtradingofrhinohorn.WhileHongKonghasreturnedconfiscatedrhinohornto
SouthAfricaforthepurposeofcriminalprosecutions(Interviewwithlawenforcementofficer
1,HongKong;Interviewwithgovernmentofficial3,SouthAfrica),areverseroutingof
‘confiscated’rhinohornintheoppositedirectionofthechainofevidence(toVietnam)seems
odd.Takenatfacevalue,thisdecisionappearstolegitimizetheillegalactivitiesofstate–
sanctionedactorswhohavebeenassociatedwiththeillegalsupplychain.Despitethese
specifiedexemptions,VietnamconfirmedtotheCITESrhinocerosesworkinggroupinJuly
2014thatnopermithadbeenissuedforivoryorrhinohornsincetheeffectivedateofthe
Decisionon24January2013(CITESRhinocerosWorkingGroup2014:5).
246
Vietnamalsobanned“non-commercialimportofhuntingtrophies”unlesscooperation
agreementshadbeensignedbetweentheVietnamCITESmanagementauthorityandthe
CITESmanagementauthorityintheexportingcountry(Vietnam2013:1).Atthetimeof
writing,VietnamesehunterswerestillbannedfromhuntinginSouthAfricaastheVietnamese
authoritieshadmadenofurtherprogressinensuringthatthehuntingtrophiesstayedwith
theoriginaltrophyhunter(Interviewwithgovernmentofficial3,SouthAfrica).Thisloophole
relatestothelackofregulationsandenforcementpertainingtowhathappenstohunting
trophiesoncetheyhavereachedVietnameseshores.Whilerhinotrophyhuntersarenot
allowedtoselltheirtrophies,therearenoregulationspreventingtheownersfromdonating
orgiftingthem.Infact,Vietnam’snationalcivillawpermitsthetrophyownertodecidehow
tousetheirtrophies.Becausehuntingtrophiesarecategorizedaspersonaleffectsinthe
SoutheastAsiancountry,authoritiessaidtheyfounditdifficulttocontrolandmonitorthem.
Inaddition,therearenopunitivemeasuresorpermitregulationsshouldthetrophyowner
decidetocutupthehorn(s)ordisposeofthetrophywithoutpriorauthorization(CITES
Secretariat2013:7–8).305VietnamwasonthereceivingendofagreatdealofcriticismatCoP
16.Vietnamesegovernmentofficialsdeniedthehugeroletheircountryplayedintheillegal
supplychainofrhinohornandpointedtheirfingersattheirneighbour,suggestingthat
VietnamservedasatransitandprocessinghubforrhinohornenroutetoChina(CITES
Secretariat2013,Interviewwithgovernmentofficial6,Vietnam).
Thetideseemstohaveturned:AprogressreportmadetotheCITESSecretariat(Vietnam
CITESManagementAuthority31January2014)onVietnam’scompliancewithdecisionstaken
atCoP16attheendofJanuary2014statesthatthecountry’sCITESmanagementauthority
haddevelopedadditionalenforcementmechanismstoprotect“precious,rareand
endangeredspecies”withaspecificfocusonrhino,elephantandpangolinproductsfrom
Africa.Themanagementauthorityisalsointheprocessofdevelopingacircularonthe
managementofhuntingtrophies.Thecircularisaimedatmonitoringthealterationof
importedhuntingtrophies.Atthetimeofwriting,thecircularhadnotbeenpublished.In
305InitsSeptember2012reporttotheCITESSecretariat,Vietnamindicatedthatmanyhunterscutuptheirhuntingtrophies(thehorns)andgiftedpiecesofrhinohorntofriendsandfamily.WhentheManagementAuthorityinVietnamundertook“randomchecks”ofhuntingtrophies,only7outof40trophieswerefoundinanunadulteratedformwhile11hunterscouldnotbecontacted(CITESSecretariat2013:23).
247
February2014,theprimeministerofVietnamissuedanadditionaldirective“On
strengtheningthedirectionandimplementationofmeasuresforcontrollingandprotecting
endangered,rareandpreciouswildanimals”.Thedirectiveprovidesamandatetorelevant
ministriestotacklewildlifecrime.TheCITESrhinocerosworkinggroupinterpretedVietnam’s
recentactionsasademonstrationofpoliticalwilltotackletheillegalwildlifetrade(CITES
RhinocerosWorkingGroup2014:5).
5.3.2TheSouthAfricanresponse
ThepreviouschapterdealtwithhistoricalaspectsofnatureandrhinoconservationinSouth
Africa,thissectionexaminesthestatusquo.Theapartheidregime’sendorsementofCITESdid
notimpactthelegitimacyofthemultilateraltreatyamongstthefirstgenerationofnature
conservationbureaucratsinthenewSouthAfrica.306Uponelectionofthefirstdemocratic
governmentin1994,anewConstitutionclearedthewayfortransformationoflaws,policies
andtheapartheidbureaucracy.Environmentalrights,sustainabledevelopmentanduseof
naturalresourcesbecameenshrinedinthenewConstitution.Thus,Section24ofthe
Constitution(RepublicofSouthAfrica1996:6)reads:
“24.Everyonehastheright-(a)toanenvironmentthatisnotharmfultotheirhealthorwell-being;and(b)tohavetheenvironmentprotected,forthebenefitofpresentandfuturegenerations,throughreasonablelegislativeandothermeasuresthat-(i)preventpollutionandecologicaldegradation;(ii)promoteconservation;and(iii)secureecologicallysustainabledevelopmentanduseofnaturalresourceswhilepromotingjustifiableeconomicandsocialdevelopment(author’semphasis).”307
Theprotectionoftheenvironment–andbytheextension,therhino–isthusconsideredand
guaranteedbythehighestlawoftheland.Intheimmediateperiodfollowingtheendof
apartheid,severalsignificanteventsimpactedthestateofnatureconservation,knownas
environmentalaffairsunderthenewdispensation.Ontheeveofthefirstdemocratic306Somebureaucratsofthe‘oldapartheid’regime’sDepartmentofNatureConservationsurvivedtheregimechange,andwereco-optedbythenewgovernment.Thisstepassistedthepost-apartheidgovernmentinutilizinginstitutionalmemorywhilealsomovingforwardwithnewpolicydirectives(Interviewwithgovernmentofficial3,2013).307Itisimportanttonotethatconstitutionalinterpretationmusttakecognizanceofinternationallaw.
248
elections,theformerfourprovincesandhomelands(knownasBantustansinapartheidlingo)
weresubdividedintonineprovinces.Saysagovernmentofficial(Interviewwithgovernment
official3,2013):
“AlthoughtheDepartmentwasthefocalpointforCITESandbecausetherewereonlyfourprovincesintheolddays,thefourdirectorswereattheforefront.Butthenfrom1994,theroleoftheDepartmentstartedincreasing.Nowthereweresuddenlynineandnotfourprovinces,therewasalotmorecoordinationtogetuniformsystemsandtrainingofthenewofficials.”
ThenewConstitutionopenedthefloorfortheclearingofanarsenalofdraconianapartheid
lawsandinstitutionsrelatingtoallsectorsofpublicandprivatelife.Concurrently,thewildlife
ranching,safariandgameindustriesexperiencedmassivegrowthastheendofapartheidhad
openeduppreviouslyuntappedinternationalmarketsofhuntersandtourists,whohad
boycottedthecountrypreviously.The1990salsosawsome‘dirtytricks’oftheapartheid
regimeexposed.The“KumlebenCommissionofInquiryintotheAllegedSmugglingandTrade
inIvoryandRhinocerosHorninSouthAfrica”(Kumleben1996)in1996andtheTruthand
ReconciliationCommission(TruthandReconciliationCommission1998)culminatinginthe
publicationofitsfinalreportin1998,revealedanundergroundnetworkofcorruptapartheid
politiciansandmilitaryintelligencepersonnelrunningsanction–bustingtradeofnatural
resourcesincludingivoryandrhinohorninAngola,Namibia(formerlyknownasSouthwest
Africa)andMozambique.Thenewenvironmentalaffairsbureaucracytransformedwithmany
formerpublicservantsfromtheoldregimeoptingoutbyacceptingretrenchmentpackages,
earlyretirementorjobopportunitiesintheprivatesector.Beyondtheinstitutionaland
staffingchangesintheDepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs(itsnameandscopeofwork
wentthroughseveralchangesinthenewSouthAfrica),thecriminaljustice,security,law
enforcementanddefencesectorsequallyweretransformed.Ofimportancehereisthe
movementofapartheidcontrolagents(soldiers,policeofficers,intelligenceandtheupper
echelonsoftherelevantbureaucracies)intotheprivatesector.Itisperhapsnotsurprising
thatmanyofthe‘apartheiddogsofwar’wouldhaveendedupintheprivatesecurityindustry,
specificallyintheanti-poachingandwildlifeprotectionsectors.Afewoftheseformercontrol
agentshavejoinedpoachinggroups.OneofthemostnotoriouspoachersinKwaZulu-Natal
249
(KZN),forexample,wastrainedbytheapartheidregimetofightinthebushwarinsouthern
AngolaandagainstMKoperativesinKZN(Interviewwithanti-poachingofficial1,2013).308
Whiletheapartheidregimeendorsedthenotionofsustainableuse,thenewdemocratic
dispensationhasputagreateremphasisonsustainableuselinkedtocommunity
empowermentandsocialdevelopmentasenvisagedbytheConstitution.Thebasictenetof
thesustainableuseapproachis“ifitpaysitstays”andinitspureformeverypartofthe
animalisused“fromtiptotoe”(Interviewwithlawenforcer2,2013).SouthAfricaisa
memberoftheGroupofLike-MindedMegadiverseCountries(LMMC),309agroupof18
countriesthatharbourcloseto70%oftheworld’sbiodiversityandsharecommoninterestsin
conservationandsustainableuseofbiologicaldiversity.AfterBrazilandIndonesia,South
Africaranksthirdinbiologicaldiversityworldwide(DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs
2014c).Beyondtherhino,therearemanyotherplantandanimalspeciesteeteringonthe
brinkofextinctionlackingcelebritystatusorpublicsupport,310alsoinneedofmaterial
assistancefromgovernment,theprivatesectorandconservationNGOs(Baillie/Butcher
2012).TheSouthAfricangovernmentfindsitselfinaquandary,whenitcomestoassessing
whichspeciesareworthyofprotection.Currentlyalldisposableconservationfundsare
channelledintorhinoandtoalesserdegree,elephantprotection,securityandconservation.
Thesinglespeciesfocusanddevotionofadministrative,lawenforcementandfinancial
resourcescomeatalosstootheranimalandplantspeciesequallyormorethreatenedwith
extinction(Interviewwithgovernmentofficial1,2013).311
308UmkhontoweSizwe(MK)–Zulufor‘SpearoftheNation’–wasthearmedwingoftheAfricanNationalCongress(ANC)duringtheliberationstruggleinSouthAfrica.309ThefollowingcountriesaremembersofLMMC:Bolivia,Brazil,China,Colombia,CostaRica,DemocraticRepublicofCongo,Ecuador,Guatemala,India,Indonesia,Kenya,Madagascar,Malaysia,Mexico,Peru,Philippines,SouthAfrica,andVenezuela.Togethertheyhold10%oftheglobalsurface(DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs2014c).310ManyofthespeciesontheIUCNRedListofcriticallyendangeredspecies,aswellasthousandsofotherspeciesofvaryinglevelsofimperilment,providenodirecteconomicbenefittopeople,andlittleisknownwhetherorhowtheirdemisewouldaffectsociety.Theseoftenlesscharismaticplantsandanimalsappeartohavelittlevaluetosocietyotherthanrepresenting“culturalorexistencevalue”;inotherwords,“theirvaluetohumanityisunknownortangentialatbest”(Baillie/Butcher2012:16).311ThisapproachstandsatloggerheadswiththeConventiononBiologicalDiversity,whichprofessesaconservationofhabitatapproach.
250
InAugust2014,theSouthAfricancabinetadoptedanewintegratedstrategicmanagement
planforrhinos.Thisplandemonstratestheparadigmshiftfromapureconservationethosto
anessentiallymulti-layeredapproachthatattemptstosubsumerhinoconservation,rhino
management,rhinosecurityandsustainableuseunderonebanner.Theimmediacyofcurbing
illegalpoachingofrhinosinprotectedareasthroughsecuritymeasuresisgivenprominence,
signallingtheincreasingsecuritizationofrhinoconservation.Accordingtotheplan
(DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs2014a),thefollowing“integratedinterventions”willbe
adopted:
“Compulsoryinterventionsincludepro-activeanti-poachinginitiatives,theimplementationandimprovementofactionableintelligenceaswellastheintroductionofresponsivelegislationandpolicyamendmentstoaddressrhinopoaching.Otherinterventionsincludecontinuedeffortstoincreaserhinonumbersthrough,forexample,translocationtolowriskareas,range-andpopulationexpansion.Newinterventionsincludestepstodisruptcrimesyndicates.ThesewillbeimplementedbyourSecurityCluster.Long-termsustainablesolutions,toensurethefuturesurvivalofthiskeyspecies,includethecreationofeconomicalternativesforcommunitiestakingintoaccountthegovernment’ssustainableutilisationpolicy.”
Inpursuitofthestatedlong-termobjectiveofsustainableuse,SouthAfricacontinuesto
campaignforthelegalizationoftradeinrhinohornattheinternationallevel.Keytogarnering
internationalsupportis“puttingSouthAfrica’shouseinorder”(Interviewwithgovernment
official3,2013).AlthoughperceptionsandthelegitimacyofCITESrangefromtacitacceptance
tosilentrebellionontheground,therelevantSouthAfricangovernmentinstitution,the
DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs(hereafterDEA)hasputmeasuresintoplacetocomply
withinternationalstandardsasenvisagedbyCITES,andtorespondtocallsfromcivilsociety
toaddresstherhinoissue.312Uponreceiptofawrittencautionfromthe57thStanding
CommitteemeetingofCITESaboutthelackofcompliancewiththeNationalLegislation
Project,313theDepartmentchangedgearsandtheCITESregulationswerepublishedinMarch
312ASouthAfricancivilsocietygroupcalledAfriforumhasthreatenedtotaketheSouthAfricangovernmenttocourtforitsfailuretorolloutappropriatemeasurestoprotecttherhino(personalcommunication,2014).313CITESinitiatedtheso-calledNationalLegislationProjectin1992,withtheobjectiveofreviewingandevaluatingnationallegislationsofCITESmemberstates,andbringingthemintolinewithCITESrequirements.Countrieswerelistedinthreecategoriesdependentontheirlevelofcompliance.Category1signifiedfullcompliance,Category2partialcomplianceandcountrieslistedinCategory3failedtomeettherequirementsforimplementationofCITES(Vasquez2003:64–65).SouthAfricahadbeenplacedinCategory2untilthepromulgationoftheCITESregulationsin2010.Thecountryisnowfullycompliant(InterviewwithGovernmentOfficial3).
251
2010(DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs2010).DomesticatingtheCITESrequirementshad
beenputonthebackburnerinlieuoftheneedtodraftnewcomprehensivelegislation,
culminatingwiththeenactmentoftheNationalEnvironmentalManagementBiodiversityAct
(NEMBA)in2004,andthepromulgationoftheThreatenedofProtectedSpeciesregulations
(TOPS)in2008.TheTOPSregulationslistprohibitedactivitiesinvolvinglistedspeciesandthey
regulatehuntingandcompulsoryregistrationrequirements.Whiletheseregulationscomply
withthelegislativerequirementssetoutbytheCITES,implementationanddiffusionhave
beenslowattheprovinciallevel.Thereisalsolimitedcongruenceoftheninesetsof
provincialenvironmentallegislation.AlthoughthethenDepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs
andTourism(thedepartment’snameatthetime)hadconsultedvariousstakeholdersand
localcommunitiesbeforedraftingtheregulations,thefinalversionandlistofprotected
specieswerenotcommunicatedaheadofpublicationandimplementation(Institutefor
SecurityStudies2009–2010,Interviewwithconservator2,2013).SimilartoJohnM.Sellar’s
critiqueregardingtheadequacyofCITESasaninstrumentinthefightagainsttransnational
organizedcrime(comparewiththesubsectionon“Theinternationalresponse”),law
enforcementofficialsinSouthAfricahaveexpressedcontemptuoussentimentsaboutthe
TOPSregulations.Saysonelawenforcementofficial(interviewwithlawenforcer8,2013):
“Theymakeregulations.Whomakestheregulationsregardingenvironmentalaffairs...therhinoregulations?Peopleinenvironmentalaffairs,ok.Buttheyhavenoexperienceorknowledgeoftransnationalorganizedcrime.Theyarecompletelyoutoftheirdepth.Andthat’snotbeingarrogant,it’sjustnottheirexperience.”
Moreover,theenforcersoftheregulations–provincialgovernmentofficials–hadneither
beensufficientlyinformedofthenewregulationsnorweretheyprovidedwithadequate
trainingpriortothepromulgation(Interviewwithprovincialgovernmentofficial,2013).
Interviewsheldwithprivaterhinoowners,conservatorsandotherwildlifeprofessionals
revealedwidespreadcontemptfortheTOPSregulationsbutthebruntofcritiquewasdirected
atthenationalmoratorium.MrMarthinusvanSchalkwyk,theformerMinisterof
EnvironmentalAffairsandTourismdeclaredanationalmoratoriumonthesaleofindividual
rhinohornsin2009(DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairsandTourism2009)–domestic
tradeofrhinohornhadneverbeenbannedandpresentedaloophole,whichcriminalactors
werereadilyabusing.AswillbeshowninChapter6,afewprivaterhinoownersandwildlife
252
professionalsprocuredrhinohornundertheguiseofdomestictradeandsolditillegallyto
Asianorganizedcrimenetworks.Beyondincomegenerationthroughthesaleofliverhinos,
tourismandtrophyhunting,thedomestictradeinrhinohornprovidedanadditionalincome
streamtoprivaterhinoowners.ThereishowevernodomesticmarketforrhinohorninSouth
Africa,suggestingthatsellersandbuyerswereeitherstockpiling,orlaunderinghorninto
illegalsupplychains.Inresponsetothegrowingdiscontentamongprivaterhinoowners,the
DEAagreedtoconductafeasibilitystudytoprobewhethernationaltradeinrhinohorn
shouldbereopenedin2010.Whileacknowledgingthatthemoratoriumfailedtoreducerhino
poaching,thestudyrecommendsthatthetradebanshouldnotbeliftedasyet.Theauthors
(Taylor,Andrewetal.2014:10–11)suggeststhefollowingplanofaction:
“SouthAfricashouldnotliftthenationalmoratoriumatthepresenttime.However,itshouldimmediatelystartdevelopingasecurenationalelectronicpermittingsystemtobringnon-complianceissuesundercontrol.ThismustbelinkedtoarhinodatabasethatincludeshornstockpileandDNAprofileinformation.Privaterhinoownersmustbeincentivisedtocontinueprotectingrhinosduringthisperiod.SouthAfricamustcontinuetoshowthatitiscomplyingwithCITESResolutionConference9.14(Rev.CoP15)toavoidpotentialpunitivemeasuresfromPartiesand,ifaproposalforlegalisinginternationaltradeistobesubmitted,SouthAfricashouldbepreparedbeforethedeadlineforsubmissionsforCoP17in2016.”
In2012,aLimpoporhinobreederstartedtolitigateagainsttheSouthAfricangovernmentto
havethemoratoriumlifted.JohnHume,theworld’sbiggestprivaterhinoownerjoinedJohan
Krügerin2015.Thepairarguesthatthegovernmentisinfringingontheirconstitutional
rights,astherighttosustainableutilizationisentrenchedwithintheConstitutionofSouth
Africa(Krüger/Hume2015).Thelegalchallengetothedomestictradebanrepresentsalawful
expressionof‘contestedillegality’againstthemoratorium.Inthisinstance,therhinobreeders
arenotusingtheirdiscontentwiththemoratoriumtolegitimizeillegaltradepracticesbut
theycontestthelegalityofthetradebanonthebasisofthehighestlawoftheland.However,
itremainsunclearwhotheirdomestictradepartnerswouldbe,shouldtheywinthecourt
case.314
314HighCourtJudgeLegodisetasidethemoratoriumduetoinsufficientpublicconsultationinSeptember2015(Legodi2015).TheMinisterlodgedanoticeofleavetoappealsoonafterthecourt’sdecision,effectivelysuspendingthejudgmentuntiltheappealisheardin2016.
253
BecausetheTOPSregulationsapplytoSouthAfrica’snationaljurisdictiononly,CITES
processesareusedtodealwith‘import’countriesandtradethattranscendshernational
borders.ThemarriagebetweentheTOPSregulationsandCITESprocesseshasbeendifficult,
asthechannelsofcommunicationwerepatchyatfirst.Forexample,provincialgovernment
officialsdealwithnationalandinternationalhuntingandtrophyapplicationsandpermits
withintheirprovince,whereasnationalgovernmentofficialscommunicatewiththeCITES
Secretariatanditsvariousenforcementbodiesregardinginternationaltradeandexport.In
lightofthepseudo-huntingphenomenon(whichisdiscussedinChapter6),involvingrhino
‘hunters’fromVietnamandotheratypicalcountriesoforiginfortrophyhunters(suchasthe
CzechRepublicandPoland),allrhinohuntingapplicationshavetobeforwardedtothe
nationaldepartmentforarecommendation.Thisnewprocedurederivesfromthepracticeof
illegitimatehunters“province-hopping”inordertoshootmorethanonerhinoperyear
withoutdetectionbyprovincialpermitofficials,whohaveonlyoversightofwhathappenson
theirowndoorstep(thepermissiblehuntingquotaisonerhinoperhunterwithinacalendar
year).Previously,provincialpermitofficershadnorecoursetodeterminingwhetherahunter
hadshotrhinosinanyoftheothereightprovinces.Oncethenationaldepartmenthasmadea
recommendation,theprovincialpermitofficermaythenissueorrefuseahuntingpermit.
Althoughthenationaldepartmenthasacentralizeddatabaseinplace,itisnotconnectedto
othercrimeorbiodiversitymanagementdatabasesasyet.Atthetimeoftheinterviewinmid-
2013,seniormanagementhadapprovedthetermsandconditionsfortheprocurementofa
comprehensiveelectronicdatabase.However,thepropersupplymanagementprocedures
andthetenderprocesshadtobefollowedanditwasunclearasofwhenthedatabasewould
bereadyforuse(Interviewwithgovernmentofficial4,2013).315
TheTOPSregulationsandthemoratoriumlacklegitimacyandbuy-infromwildlife
professionalsaswellasprivatelandowners,whofeelthattheywerenotsufficientlyconsulted
aheadofthepromulgationwhilebeingtheonesmostaffectedbythenewstatusquo.In
addition,manyprovincialgovernmentslackthestaffing,fundingandexpertisetoimplement
thecomplexnewregulations(Interviewwithprivaterhinoowners;privatesecurityactorsand
315By2016,therehadbeennoprogressregardingthecentralizeddatabase.However,lawenforcementofficialswereintheprocessofstreamliningpermittingprocedures,whicharelikelytobecentralizedandcontrolledexclusivelybythenationaldepartment.
254
wildlifeprofessionals).Thepermittingsystemdiffersacrossthenineprovinceswithvarying
degreesofefficiency,responsivenessandaccountability.
Theperceivedlackoffollow-upconsultationwithrelevantstakeholderschangedwiththe
appointmentoftheRhinoIssueManager(RIM),MavusoMsimangwhowasassignedthetask
ofconductingaseriesofstakeholderengagementstoaddresstheprotectionandsustainable
conservationoftheSouthAfricanrhinopopulationsduring2012.Theso-calledRIMprocess
entailed16workshopsheldintheSouthAfricanprovincesofGauteng,KwaZulu-Natalandthe
WesternCape.UltimatelytheRIMtalksassistedtheDEAindevelopingtheSouthAfrican
positioninpreparationfortheCITESCoP16heldin2013(Msimang2012:7).Msimang(2012:
9)pointstothediscrepancybetweenscientificdatacollectedoveryears,andpositionsthat
werebasedon“sentimentaloraestheticconsiderations”.Thedistancebetweenhardsciences
andemotionisoneofthekeyelementscausingariftamongdifferentactorswithintherhino
management,conservationandassociatedprotectioneconomies.ThefinalRIMreport
proposesanumberofmeasurestosavetherhino,mostimportantlytheopeningof
internationaltradeinitshorn:
“Theabsenceofasinglestrategytoquellandannulrhinopoachingcallsforthejudiciousemploymentofseveralcarefullythought–outinterventionsinaportfolioapproach.Intheimmediateterm,therecanbenosubstituteforheightenedsecurityusingthetriedandtestedrangerbolsteredbythebestavailabletechnologies.Simultaneously,biologicalconservationmeasures,includingrangeexpansion,shouldbeinvestigatedandimplemented.Finally,aslongasthereisdemandforrhinohorn,effectivemeansofsupplyingit,mustbeworkedoutthatwouldhavetheeffectofsavingthelifeoftherhino.ThesestrategiesmustbefinalizedwithurgencyandanapplicationmadetotheConferenceofPartiestolegalizetradeinrhinohorn(Msimang2012:10).”
IntheaftermathoftheRIMtalksanInter-MinisterialCommittee316wassetuptodeliberate
thepossibilityofalegaltradeinrhinohorn,supportedbyaCommitteeofExperts(CoE).The
CoEcommenceditsworkinApril2014(DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs30June2014)
andprovideditsfinalreporttotheMinisterin2015.TheSouthAfricangovernmentis316TheMinistersofEnvironmentalAffairs,InternationalRelationsandCooperation,TradeandIndustry,Finance,ScienceandTechnology,Agriculture,ForestryandFisheries,RuralDevelopmentandLandReform,EconomicDevelopmentandTourism,SafetyandSecurity,JusticeandCorrectionalServicesarerepresentedintheInter-MinisterialCommittee.
255
acknowledgingthatprotectivemeasuresarefailing.Whetherareversalofthetradebanis
goingtosavetherhinoisahighlycontestedissueinSouthAfricaandbeyond.Sufficeto
mentionherethatchampionsoftheso-called‘anti-trade’faction(whichisbynomeansa
homogenousgroup)areoftheopinionthattheSouthAfricangovernmentlacksthepolitical
willtosavetherhino,andisintheprocessofsigningofftherhino’sdeathwarrantbyeven
entertainingthoughtsofreopeningthetrade(Interviewswithrepresentativesofconservation
NGOs,2013,2014and2015).Otherthansuggestingsupplementary,somewhatdraconian
security,militaryandanti-poachingmeasures,theanti-tradefactionoffersnoalternative
approaches.Laterchapterstouchonmilitaryandsecuritymeasuresemployedtoprotectthe
rhinos.Sufficetomentionherethattheserhinoprotectioneconomieshavebecomemulti-
millionenterpriseswiththeinvolvementofmanyactorsfromtheprivatemilitaryandsecurity
sectorsinSouthAfricaandbeyond,themilitary-industrialcomplex,wildlifeprofessionals,as
wellasamultitudeofintelligenceoperatives.
Theinternationalregulatorystipulationshavebeendomesticated;liketheinternational
conventiontheylackbroad-basedlegitimacyandsupportbythosemostaffected.In
conclusion,itshouldbenotedthatillegalflowsofrhinohornhavenotbeendisrupteddespite
theSouthAfricangovernment’smulti-levelandmulti-departmentalapproachtoprotecting
therhino.
5.4ConcludingremarksThischapterexploredtheinternationalpoliticalprotectionregimethatledtotheillegalization
ofthetradeinrhinohorn.Stateactorsconceivedofthemultilateralenvironmentaltreaty
morethanfortyyearsago.Inotherwords,theillegalizationofthetradeinrhinohorn
commencedin1977.Priortothat,marketexchangesinvolvingrhinohornwereeitherlegalor
undetermined.Inthisinstance,acommunityofstates,theCITESCoP,determinedthetrade
ban.Thebanitselfisambiguousasitonlyconcernsinternationaltradeofrhinohorn,leaving
spaceforillegalmarketactorstomanoeuveratthedomesticlevel.Thepowerdynamicsand
influenceofnortherncountriesandconservationNGOsatCITEShaveledtogrowing
disgruntlementamongstthecustodiansofmostoftheworld’sremainingbiodiversity.
256
Regulatorsandopinion-makersonthesupplysidehavestampedCITESasa‘neo-colonial’
institutionwhileimportantconsumerstatesjoinedCITESonlyyearsafteritsinception.
Irrespectiveofpowerpoliticsandthenorth-southdivide,thediffusionofthetradebanwas
goingtotaketimeinlightofthetransnationaldimensionsofrhinohornflows.Ideally,
illegalizationatthenationallevelwouldencompassaprotractedprocessofconsultationwith
affectedconstituencies.Lawenforcementofficialshaveexpressedconcernsofwhethertrade
bansappropriatearemeasurestodisrupttransnationalorganizedcrimenetworks.
ThechapterexaminedhowSouthAfricaandVietnamdomesticatedCITESobligations,
demonstratingthedifficultiesofimplementinginternationalcommitmentsthatareoutof
touchwiththerealityontheground.Whilemostcountrieshaveillegalizedrhinohorntrade,
hornconsumptioncontinuestohoverinagrayzone.Chapter3pointedtothesocial
legitimacyandculturalsignificanceofrhinohorninkeyconsumernations.Thesacred
valuationofrhinohorninsuchcountriesunderminesthelegitimacyofthetradeban.This
stateofaffairsisaccentuatedbythefactthatpublicofficialsareimplicatedintraffickingand
distributionnetworks,suggestingthatthetradebanhasbeenineffectiveincurbingsupply
anddemand.
257
Chapter6:Ridingontheedgeoflegality:Interfacesbetweenlegal,grayandillegalmarkets
“Itisoneguyusingitasadoorstopper;thenextguyputsitintohissafewithagoldchainaroundit.Theywantthemoratoriumtohavestartedthepoaching;itmakessensefortheirargument.Theywanttoblamesomethingfortherightthathasbeentakenawaytomakemoney.Theytryandsaythetradewasgoingtomakeusrich.WhichSouthAfricanisgoingtopay25,000Randforonekgofrhinohorn?Sothatargumentdoesn'tstickforme(Interviewwithlawenforcementofficial,2013).”
6.1IntroductionChapter4providesanintroductiontotheprivatizationandcommodificationoftherhinoon
thesupplysideofthemarket.Thischaptercontinueswithanexaminationofrhinohorn
‘production’317onprivateland.Thismodeof‘production’constitutedtheprincipalsourceof
supplyofSouthAfricanrhinohornbetweenthelate1960sandlate2000s.Actorscapitalizeon
theliberalinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegality.Bolsteredbysentimentsofcontested
illegalityandlegality,theseactorshavenoqualmstoexploitregulatoryloopholes.Involved
arewildlifeprofessionals318withintimateknowledgeoftheproduct(rhinohorn)andofthe
institutionalandlegislativeframeworkgoverningtheinternationaltradeofrhinohorn.These
actorsbelongtoinfluentialandtransnationalsocialnetworkswithlinkstopoliticaland
economicelitesinsupply,transitandconsumercountries.Rhinoowners,professional
hunters,wildlifeveterinarians,corruptgovernmentofficials,diplomats(theirroleisdiscussed
inChapter7and8)andothercategoriesofwildlifeprofessionalsaretheprincipalactorsin
thismarketsegment.
Wildlifeprofessionalsarealsoinvolvedintheillegalhuntingofrhinosonprivateandpublic
hunting(suchaschemicalpoaching);319organizedillegalhunting(poaching)isdiscussedin
317Theterm“production”referstothesupplystageofthemarketandisusedinreferencetomarketstructuresandprocesseshere,andnotasanormativeclaimregardingconditionsonrhinofarms.318Theterm“wildlifeprofessional”referstoanyindividualwhoisinvolvedinthetransporting,translocation,well-being,management,farming,breeding,huntingandsecuringofwildlifeonprivateorpublicland(mydefinition).319WildlifeprofessionalsuseaveterinaryanaestheticdrugcalledM-99(oritsgenericformulation)during‘chemicalpoaching’incidents.Poachersdartrhinosanddehornthemwhiletheyareanesthetized(Hübschle
258
Chapter7.Thischapterdrawsondatafromseveralcourtcases,aswellasprimarydata
collectedduringfieldwork.Thefocusisonillegalhuntingwhilealsotouchingonthepractice
ofunregisteredstockpilingandhornlaundering.
6.1‘Putandtake’andotherhuntingtransgressionsTheBuijsreport(1987)referredtoapracticeknowncolloquiallyas‘putandtake’(introduced
inChapter4).Thetermreferstothehuntingofarhinoshortlyafterdeliverytoaprivategame
reserveorgamefarm.Inotherwords,therhinoisliterally“put”intoahuntingreserve,only
tobe“taken”outbywayofhuntingshortlyafteritstranslocationtothehuntingreserve.The
practicecommencedinthe1970sandcarriesoninvariouspermutationstothisday.Forthe
purposesofclarity:trophyhuntingofwhiterhinos320boughtfromthestateisnotillegalper
se;infact,thestateacknowledgestheneedforeconomicincentivesfor“thecontinued
growthandexpansionoftherhinopopulationsandrangethroughtheintroductionofherdsin
newareas”whichare“reliantontheprivatesectorandcommunitiesmakingtheirland
availablefortheintroductionofrhinossourcedfromprotectedareasandprivatelyowned
herds”(RepublicofSouthAfrica2013:6).However,trophyhuntingthatleadstolimitedorno
populationgrowthandrangeexpansioncontradictsandunderminesthespecified
conservationobjectivesofthestate.Accordingtowildlifeprofessionals(Interviews,2013),
somehuntingoutfitterswouldkeepthesamenumberofrhinosintheirreservesand“new
stock”wouldbebroughtinfortrophyhunts.Inessence,thisformof‘putandtake’involvesa
deadlygameofmusicalchairs.Onewildlifeprofessionalrecountedhowheandhiscolleagues
deliveredmorerhinostoaspecifichuntingoutfitinoneweekthananallegedkingpin“didin
hiswholetimeofdoingpseudo-hunting”(Interview,2013).Whilethisformof‘putandtake’
waslegalonpaperatthetime,therhinotrophiesemanatingfrommany‘legalhunts’were
2014:47).Wildlifeveterinariansareusuallycomplicitinsuchpoachingincidents,whichmayalsorequiretheservicesofhelicopterpilots.Wildlifeinvestigatorshavedubbedtheactas“chemicalpoaching”duetotheuseofpharmaceuticaldrugs(“chemicals”).320“OperationRhino”,theNatalParksBoard’srhinorangeexpansionprogrammecoincidedwiththeeconomizationoftrophyhunting;inotherwords,trophyhunterswerewillingtopayforthestalkingofanimalsasofthelate1960s.Whiterhinosbecamesought-aftertrophyanimalsinSouthAfrica.Blackrhinonumbers,meanwhile,weretoofewtooffertrophyhunting.
259
solddirectlytoAsianbuyersorlaunderedintoillegalflows.Saysthesamewildlife
professional(Interview,2013):
“Wewereshootingtheshitoutofthem,probably100amonthbuteverythingwaslegal.Youknow–that'sthethingifit'slegal,yougetpermitsforitandyouboughtit,whynot?…[…]…Theminute,theymadeitillegal–I'mnotwillingtotouchitifcan'tgetapermit.Idon'tmindmakingabuck,butIdon'tdoillegalshitandgotojail.”
Interviewswithorganizedcrimeinvestigators,formerandactiveconservatorsconfirmedthe
highprevalenceofthepractice.Rhinohornsderivingfrom‘putandtake’operationsfedinto
illegalhornflowsfromelsewhereinSouthAfricaandsurroundingcountries(including
Namibia,Zimbabwe,andMozambique)enroutetoconsumermarkets.Oncethesupplyof
hornshadebbedofffromsourcesnorthofSouthAfrica,SouthAfricanwildlifeprofessionals
steppeduptomeetthesupply.Itisdifficulttoestablishhowmanyrhinoswerehuntedby
wayof‘putandtake’,asexistingofficialdatabasesonthesaleofliverhinos,hunts,and
trophyexportsonlycaptureofficialnumbers.Oneinformantremarked:
“There’samassiveblankfromwhenfuckingTRAFFICstoppedmonitoringstuffuntiltheyrealizedtherewasshit.Andinthatvoidwehaveonlythefarmersandthevetsthatknowwhatweweredoing.Butyoucan’ttellanyonebecauseotherwisetheyaregoingtoputyouintojail.Eventhougheverythingyoudidatthetimewaslegalandnowtheywanttotryandfuckingcatchsomeone.Theseareguysthatwerelegallyinvolvedinsomething,whichisnowillegal.Howdoyouwanttoprosecutethem?Nobodyisgoingtoadmittoanything.Theywillstandtogether.”
Theinformantalludestoasocialbondamongstwildlifeprofessionalswhojustify‘putand
take’anddomestictradeofrhinohornasapracticepermissiblebythelawoftheland.There
isatacitacknowledgmentthattheseunbridledeconomicactivitiesmaylacksociallegitimacy
inbroadersociety.Awildlifeveterinarian,forexample,describedthehunts(including
pseudo-huntingwhichisdiscussedbelow)as“pre-moratoriumlegal(butunethical)hunts”
mainlyinvolving“surplusbullsintheindustry”(Schack2012:1).Empiricalevidenceconfirms
thatbullsweretheprincipaltrophyanimals;however,afewhuntingoutfittersofferamore
exoticbouquetofhuntingsafarissuchashuntingmultiplerhinosononepermit,hunting
younganimals,huntingofrhinoswithrestrictedhuntinggear(includingcrossbowsorbow
andarrows),or“canned”BigFivehuntingfromhelicopters(Interviews,2013).
260
Theknowledgethatsomeactivitiesmightbeconstruedaslegalbutillegitimateorunethical
(thesectionon‘contestedillegality’willdiscussthisinmoredetail)mightexplainwhythe
sectorcontinuestobeshroudedinsecrecy.Consecutivesurveysofrhinosonprivateland
sketchahistoricalnarrative(seealsoChapter4)ofhowconservationauthoritiesexperienced
difficultiesinaccessinginformationonthefateofrhinosboughtfromthestate,andtheir
progenyfromtheearly1970sonwards.Anauthorofthelatestsurveyonrhinonumbersand
stockpilesonprivateland,undertakenbetween2008and2011,remarkedthatthesurvey
obtainedaresponserateof25%fromrhinoowners(JoShaw,personalcommunication,
2015).Earliersurveysachievedevenlowerratesofparticipation(Hall–Martinetal.2008).The
questionariseswhythemajorityofrhinoownersarenotwillingtoprovideinformationon
theirrhinonumbersorthesizeoftheirrhinohornstockpiles.Naturally,oncepropertyrights
wereconferreduponprivateindividuals,rhinosmovedfromthepublictotheprivatesphere.
Thisnewbreedofprivaterhinoownershadbecomesoleproprietorsofrhinoswithno
reportingoraccountabilityfunctionsobtainingfromtheconversionofacommongoodto
privateproperty.Thisstateofaffairsisdifferenttorecentcustodianshipprograms,where
communitiesorindividualsreceiveuserrightswhilerhinosremainthepropertyofthestate.
Insomeinstances,privatesales,translocations,thesaleofgamereservesandfarms,orthe
creationoflargeamalgamatedreservesandbiospheresledtoobfuscationastorhino
ownershiporlocation(Buijs/Papenfus1996:1–2).Thiswasnotnecessarilyapurposeful
attemptatcreatingsmokescreens.Theregulatoryframeworkgoverningmovement,
translocationsandprivatesaleorbartertradeofrhinoscameonlyintoforcewhenthe
NEMBAActwasenactedandtheTOPSRegulationswerepromulgatedin2004and2008
respectively.Yetrhinoownersmaintainthatthestateshouldhavenobusinessastokeeping
trackofthefateofthefoundingpopulationsandtheirprogeny(Interviewwithrhinoowner
10,2013)because“whathappensbehindthisgamefenceismybusiness”(Presentationby
conservator14,2015).ThisattitudeprecedestheperiodofpoliticaltransformationinSouth
Africaanduncertaintyaboutthefutureofthefarmingcommunity.Therewerefewlegitimate
reasonstoconcealsuchinformationintheheydaysofapartheidunlesstherewereindeed
illegal,unethicalorillegitimateactivitiestakingplace.Inpost-apartheidSouthAfrica,the
whitefarmingcommunityremainsdistrustfulofthedemocraticallyelected(mostlyblack)
government.Whilethewhitefarmingcommunityisbynomeansahomogenousgrouping,its
strongpoliticaltiestotheapartheidregime,economicprivilegesandsupport(suchas
261
subsidies,marketingboardsandpropertyrightsofwildanimals)andexploitativelabour
relationsonsomefarmshadcontributedtolarge-scalesocialengineeringinSouthAfrica’s
ruralareas,andupheldthesocialstructureandeconomicpowerbaseoftheapartheidstate
(seealsoChapter4).Thisprivilegedstateofaffairsshiftedtoincorporatetheinterestsofrural
(black)dwellersandcommunitieswiththechangingofthepoliticalguardin1994.
OnceNEMBAandtheTOPSregulationscameintoeffect,wildlifeprofessionalsreportedthat
uponapplyingforpermitstohuntordehornrhinos,ortoregisterrhinohornstockpiles,
poachershittheirreservesororganizedgangsrobbedtheirstockpilesatgunpoint(Interview
withrhinoowner1&6,2013).Rhinoownersfeltthatfulldisclosureputthematriskfor
poaching,farmattacksortheftfromrhinohornstockpiles.Whilesuchfearsarelegitimate,
thepeersofrhinoowners–suchasmembersofthePrivateRhinoOwnersAssociation(PROA)
–struggletogainaccesstothis‘privileged’informationtoo(Interviews,2013).Thislackof
transparencymightultimatelyderailthequestforthelegalizationofthetradeinrhino
horn.321
Dishonestyornon-disclosureispartiallylegitimizedbypointingto“corruptpermitofficers”or
tootherpublicofficialsperceivedasharbouringconnectionstoorganizedcrimegangs.322In
otherinstances,roguefarmersorwildlifeprofessionalsinstigatedrobberiesandtheftas
smokescreenstocacheillegalhuntingordehorningofrhinos(Interviewsandfocusgroups
withlawenforcementofficials,2013).Awarenessof‘foulapples’inthepeergroup,the
associatedfearofstigmaaswellassilentrebelliondirectedatpublicofficialsand“theirnew
regulations”alsoexplainwhynon-disclosure,obfuscation,andsecrecyofrhinopopulations
andstockpilesheldinprivatehand,continuetocharacterizetherelationshipofsomeprivate
rhinoownerswiththestate.Thisenvironmentofdistrustandsecrecyhasallowedrogueand
unethicalwildlifeprofessionalstoflyundertheradar,whoareprotectedthroughamutual
321TheCITESSecretariathasadmonishedSouthAfricainthepastforfailingtofurnishdetailsonthesizeofprivaterhinohornstockpiles,aswellasexactfiguresofrhinocrashesheldonprivateland.322Whileracismandracialdiscriminationarestillwidespreadacrossmanycommunitiesinpost-apartheidSouthAfrica,thewhitefarmingcommunityisrenownedfordiscriminatoryandracistpractices(comparewithChapter4).Althoughtherehavebeenincidencesofcorruptionwithinthelawenforcementandnatureconservationbureaucracies,theassumptionthatallpublicofficialsofthenewdispensationarecorruptandcorruptiblehastobereadinthecontextofawhitesuperioritycomplexsupportedbyracistapartheidideologiesofyesteryear.
262
distrustbythewhitefarmingcommunityofthenewgovernment,itslandreformprogramme
andbroad-basedblackempowermentpolicies.
Regardlessoftheprevailingsecrecy,‘putandtake’ofrhinobullsboughtfromthestate
happenedwiththeindirectsanctioningofthestate(Interviews,2013);parkofficials,for
example,knewthatarhinobull’slifeexpectancywassignificantlyshortenedwhensoldtoa
huntingoutfitteroragamereservethatofferstrophyhunts.ScientistsarguethattheSouth
Africannationalherdwasonlyabletorecoverandincreasetoitscurrentsizebecauseprivate
andcommunalfarmersmadefarmlandavailableforrangeexpansion(Emslie/Brooks1999:
33).The‘carryingcapacity’ofnationalparksandnaturereserveshadbeenreached.Scientific
studieslegitimizethehuntingof“surplusbulls”or“problembulls”bywayofdemonstrating
aninherentmalegenderbiasinrhinopopulations.TheSADCRhinoManagementGroup
(RMG)foundthattherewasa53%malesexratioofblackrhinoatbirthinthesouthern
Africanregion.Someblackrhinopopulationshavehenceapronouncedmalebias
(Knight/AfricanRhinoSpecialistGroup2013:2).Abehaviouralstudyofwildblackrhino
populationsinNamibia(Berger1995:1–2)suggestshoweverthatsecondarysexratios323
favourfemaleblackrhinos,asmalerhinosaremorepronetohumanpredation,afinding
consistentwithdatafrom12blackrhinopopulationsacrossAfrica.Themalebiasappearsto
beofgreatersignificancewhenitcomestosemi-wildorcaptivebredrhinopopulations.Few
rhinobullsarerequiredtoachieveidealbreedingconditionsandsignificantpopulation
growth.Aranchingmanualsuggestsaratioof2maleto4femalewhiterhinos(duToit1998:
11).Breedingbullsshouldbereplacedeverysixyears“beforetheystartbreedingwiththeir
ownoffspring”whileagevariance,amongstotherfactors,canaffectdominancepatterns
amongrhinobullswhichinaworstcasescenariocanendinthedeathofmalecompetitors
(duToit1998:29).
Blackrhinosareknownasthemoreaggressiveandsolitaryoftherhinospeciesthus“problem
bulls”havebeentraditionallyassociatedwiththeblackspecies,whereasthemorenumerous
whiterhinostendtobeassociatedwiththemanagementissueof“surplusbulls”.Bothof
323Theprimarysexratioreferstothesexratioatthetimeofconceptionwhereasthesecondarysexratioisthesexratioatthetimeofbirth.
263
theserhinomanagementissuesareconflatedinpublicandpolicydiscourseonthematter.
Whiletheonedoesnotprecludetheother,theyshouldbeseenastwodistinctmanagement
issueswithseparateoutcomes,dependingonthespecies,habitatandbreedingformat.
Governmentauthorities(theNamibianandSouthAfricangovernments)employtherationale,
whichlegitimizesthetrophyhuntingorsaleof“problembulls”and“surplusbulls”324at
intervalstomaintainthehealth,longevityandsocialstructureofrhinoherds.325Animal
activistshavesuggestedthattranslocating“problemanimals”tootherlocationscouldsave
theanimal’slife(Fears[3January2015]2015).Suchtranslocationscomehoweveratahigh
price.326Movingsurplusorproblembullstootherrhinopopulationsmaybeequally
problematicastheseherds“donotwantadditionalmales”(Knight/AfricanRhinoSpecialist
Group2013:2).Inlightofseverelyconstrainedconservationbudgets,governmentauthorities
cannotaffordtotranslocate“problemanimals”(Interviews,2013).Meanwhile,animal
activistsarenotfrontingthemoneytoundertakethesuggestedtranslocations,whichinvolve
findingsuitableland,capture,translocationandon-goingmanagementandmonitoring
(Knight/AfricanRhinoSpecialistGroup2013:5).Whiletherearenoreliablestatisticsabout
thepercentageof“problembulls”inrhinoherds,327someconservatorsandanimalactivists
324AstatewitnesscalledonbehalfoftheStateinaggravationofsentenceduringtheLemtongthaitrial(thelinkedphenomenonofpseudo-huntingisdiscussedinthenextsection)concededthattherhinosthatwerehuntedandkilledduringthepseudo-huntingexpeditionshadbeensurplusbulls“thatweredestinedtobeshotbytrophyhunters”(Navsa/Wallis/Swain2014:12).TheappellatejudgerulingonbehalfoftheSupremeCourtofAppealsregardedthisconcessionasadistinguishingfeatureofthiscaseofpseudo-huntingfrom“thoseoftheconventionaltypeofpoacher,namely,apersonwhokillsindiscriminatelywithoutanypretenceoflegality”(Navsa/Wallis/Swain2014:12).325TheNamibiangovernmentisallowedtosellfiveblackrhinohuntsperannum.Thefullquotahasneverbeenexploited.In2013,theDallasSafariClub(DSC)auctionedoffablackrhinohuntingpermitonbehalfoftheNamibiangovernmentfortheheftysumof$350000.AnimalactivistshavecriticizedtheauctionandpetitionedtheUnitedStatesFishandWildlifeServicetopreventtheimportofthehuntingtrophy.326ConservationorganizationRhinoswithoutBordersisplanningtomove100whiterhinosfromSouthAfricatoBotswanaatacostof$45000peranimal(approximately40266€peranimal)(Paul2014).Thetranslocationofdesert-adaptedblackrhinosinNamibiacostsanestimated$10000peranimal(approximately8940€)involvingtheuseofhelicoptersinremoteareas(Fears[3January2015]2015).327InresponsetothefalloutaftertheDSCauctionintheUS,theAfricanRhinoSpecialistGroup(AfRSG)providedthefallingdata:
“Basedonextensivemonitoringofthespeciesinitskeyrangestatesoveranextendedperiodweknowthatsomeblackrhinosarebeingkilledinfightswithaggressivebullsandthatvaluablebreedingfemalesandtheircalvesaresometimeskilled.Thisismorelikelytobethecasewhendensitiesbuilduprelativetocarryingcapacityinanarea,andwherebreedingpopulationshaveamarkedlymalebiasedpopulation.(SADCRMGdatashowsthatfrom2007-2011fightingdeathswerethesinglegreatestknowncauseofknownblackrhinodeathsinNamibia(31%)withfemalesandsub-adults/calvesmaking
264
havequestionedtheperceivedhighincidenceof“problemanimals”(Interviews,2013).There
havebeensuggestionsthatthenotionof‘problembulls’isexploited(personal
communicationwithconservator,2014)328tosell“surplusbulls”forprofittohunting
outfitters.Rhinobreedersalsousethelackofbreedingsuccessasalegitimationdeviceto
allowtrophyhuntsofnon-breedingrhinocows(Interviews,2013).
Whilethestate’sadoptionofthenotionof“problembulls”and“surplusbulls”isembeddedin
scientificdiscourse,criminalactorshaveabusedthenotionof“problemanimals”tolegitimize
illegalhuntingofrhinos.TheUSindictmentofDawieGroenewald329chargesthatthealleged
rhinohorntraffickersoldillegalrhinohuntstoAmericanhuntersatgunandhuntingshows
(thenextsectionprovidesmoredetailsontheGroenewaldgang).TheownerofOutofAfrica
AdventurousSafarisandhisUS-basedbrotherJannemanGroenewaldclaimedallegedlythat
particularrhinoshadtobehuntedbecausetheypresenteda“problem”,werea“nuisance”,a
“menace”,“aggressive”and“dangerous”or“mean”(TheGrandJuryfortheMiddleDistrictof
Alabama2014:8–14).TheGroenewaldbrotherstoldtheirAmericanclientsthatbecausethe
deadordartedrhinos330were“problem”animals,theirremains/hornscouldnotbeexported
asatrophy.Inlieuofreturninghomewiththehuntingtrophy,thehunterscouldtake
measurementsoftherhinohorns.Theycouldalsotakephotosandvideosofthehuntand
themselvesposingwiththedeadanimal.Accordingtotheindictment,Groenewaldsoldthe
up26.7%and35%ofallfightingdeathsrespectively)(Knight/AfricanRhinoSpecialistGroup2013:1).”
328ASouthAfricanprofessionalhunter,hisUSclientandconservationofficialslinkedtotheNamibianMinistryoftheEnvironmentandTourism(MET)wereinvolvedinablackrhinobulltrophyhuntin2013,whichledtothewrongfulkillingoftheonlyblackrhinocowinMangettiNationalParkinNamibia.Thequartetallegedlythoughtthattheywerestalkingarhinobull.Thetrophyhunterclaimedthatheshottherhinocowafteritchargedthehuntingparty.Thecasehasbeenmiredincontroversywithanecdotalevidencesuggestingfoulplay,bribesandexpirationofhuntingpermits(personalcommunicationwithprofessionalhunterandconservator,2014).329Theallegedrhinopoachingtraffickerfaces1736countsofracketeering,moneylaundering,fraud,intimidation,illegalhuntinganddealinginrhinohornsinSouthAfrica.TheprovisionaltrialdatewassetforAugust2015butislikelyonlytogoaheadin2016(Rademeyer2014a).330TheSouthAfricangovernmenthasbannedso-called‘greenhunts’or‘dartingsafaris’whiletheSouthAfricanVeterinaryCouncilhasdeclaredtheman“unethicalprocedure”in2010(SouthAfricanVeterinaryCouncil2010).Originallyconceivedas“auniquesynergybetweensportshuntingandconservation”(SouthAfrica.info2005),greenhuntsinvolvethetemporaryimmobilizationofwildanimalsforresearchormanagementpurposes(SouthAfricanVeterinaryCouncil2010).Unscrupulouswildlifeoperatorsexploitedgreenhuntsbydartinganimalstoofrequentlywithoutconsiderationfortheanimal’swell-beingorthelong-termeffectsofrepeatedanaesthesia(Interviews,2013).
265
rhinohornsobtainedfromthesehuntstocriminalnetworks(TheGrandJuryfortheMiddle
DistrictofAlabama2014:8),thusprofitingfromboth:theillegalhuntstolegitimatetrophy
hunters,andthesubsequentillegalsaleofrhinohornstocriminalactors.TheAmerican
hunterswereallegedlynottoldthatthesehuntswerenotpermitted(lackedtherequired
paperwork)andwereinviolationofSouthAfricanlaws.Itisnonethelessrathersurprisingthat
thehuntersboughtGroenewald’sfabricationsandrelinquishedthecollectionoftheirhunting
memorabilia.
‘Putandtake’transactionscouldalsoinvolvetheexchangeofrhinosforotherspeciesof
wildlifeorrhinohornwithoutanymoneyexchanginghands.Arhinobreedercould,for
example,exchangetwoyoungrhinobullsforafixednumberofwildanimalswithanother
farmer.Thebreedercouldalsoswapthesametwoyoungrhinobullsformultiplesetsofrhino
horn.Breederswerealsopayingwildlifeprofessionals(e.g.wildlifeveterinariansorwildlife
capturers)withunregisteredrhinohorn.331Thestatewouldhavenorecordofthese
transactionsbecausetherewerenoofficialpapertrailsnorwasthereanyexchangeofmoney
perse.Awildlifeprofessionalexplains(Interviewwithwildlifeprofessional2):
“…inthatprocesstherewasthedeadlytimingofotherguysrealizing:wecanselltheselegallytoguysthroughhunts.Therewereseveralguystryingtojumpontothebandwagon.ThefirstguytodoitproperlywasoldMrSmithandtherewasawholebunchofothersthatyouhaven'theardofbecausetheywerethecleverguys.Theidiotsgotcaught.Theguysthatbehavelikeidiots,theyaretheonesthatcomeinwithorganizedcrimeconnections.Withthestartingofthepseudo-hunts,guysgotawobblethatwecan'tshootrhinosanymore.IthinktheshitstartedatoldTimBartonnearStevenvanderMerwe.Hewasalsobuyingquitealotofstuff[rhinohorn]fromSteven.TheguysweredoinghuntsatTimBartonandwewoulddropofflittlerhinos–twoorthree-year-olds.Theywouldshootthoseandleavewithbigrhinohorns,whichcamefromSteven.Hesaid
331WildlifetransportersandgamecapturershavesmuggledrhinohorninsidetranslocationcratesfromSouthAfricatoAsiancountries(Interviewwithroguewildlifeprofessional2;lawenforcementofficial2;rhinofarmer12;2013).Accordingtoawildlifeprofessional(Interview;2013):
“Atthesametimewewerestartingtosendallourrhinoout–shipmentstoChina–youknowandwhenweweresendingourshipmentstoChina,therewerelotsofhornsgoingwiththoserhinos.Soeachbabyrhinohadabigrhinohornlyinginitscrate.Ifanybodysaidanything,thenthisallhadjustbrokenoff…[…]…thesewerenotsmugglingnetworks,organizedcrime–thesewerejustguysthathavemadetheconnectionandwhosaid:“Let'sdothisaswell".Inthatprocess,everybodystartedtorealize:“Wow,lookwhatwecangetforthestuff."
266
hehadsomanyrhinos,whatishesupposedtodowithit.Then,whentheyputthemoratoriumon,that'swheneverythingchanged.”332
Regulatorshavetriedtoaddressthepracticeof‘putandtake’.Regulation24ofthe
ThreatenedorProtectedSpeciesRegulations(TOPS)directsthatrhinosmayonlybehunted
24monthsafterintroductionintoanareatoallowthemtoestablishageneticline(Friedmann
etal.2011:3).Inpractice,thisregulationisdifficulttoenforce–andoperatorshavealready
devisedamechanismtobypasstheregulation,the‘swapandtake’method.Inthisinstance,
therhinoownerswapsthenewlyacquiredrhinowithanextantrhinoonthefarm,whichis
thenmadeavailableforatrophyhunt.Both‘putandtake’and‘swapandtake’areonthe
borderlinesofwhatconstituteslegalityandillegalityandwithoutscrutiny,thelineiseasily
crossed.Moreover,‘putandtake’enabledotherformsofillegalhunting,dehorning,andhorn
launderingonprivateland.
6.2PermitfraudAllmodesofhorn‘production’onprivatelandsharethecommonalitythatperpetrators
displaydetailedandextensiveknowledgeoftherulesandhowtobypass,floutorbreakthe
same,orexploitlegalloopholes.Whilewildlifeprofessionalsandrhinoownerstendtoregard
thelaw(NEMBA),theregulations(TOPSregulations)andthemoratoriumondomestictrade
asresponsibleforthesurgeofpoaching,theregulatoryframeworkdidnotemergefroma
vacuum.Infact,asdocumentedinpreviouschapters,thefirstrulesgoverningthe
managementandspecificallythehuntingofwildlifewerepassedduringcolonialtimes.The
breakingorfloutingofhuntingruleswasseenagentleman’sderelict(unlessitinvolved
indigenoushuntersorAfrikaners)and,insomecases,itwasariteofpassage.Adouble
moralitylegitimizesmodernrulebreaking,partiallylinkedtoasenseofentitlementand
privilege,andtheearlieraverredto‘silentrebellion’tothenewrule–makersand“theirrules”.
Awildlifeprofessionalexplains(Interview,2013):
332Thenamesofindividualsmentionedinthecitationhavebeenchangedtopreservetheanonymityofrespondents.
267
“Thewayitusedtowork,thelawwasalwaystherebutnobodyeverpushedit.Within48hoursoftheguygettingthehorn,youhadtogotonatureconservationandgetachipin.Andthenyoucouldapplyforapermitandsellit.Asyouhadapermittosellandtrade,theyneverkepttrackofanything.Youcouldsellwithoutanyonenoticingorcaring.Andbecauseitwasn'treallycheckedon,ifyouhadapermitforonehorn,youcoulduseitforweeksormonths.Sowhatalotofpeoplemissisnotonlytheentitlementthatthefarmerfeelsandthatheistrulyentitledto.Hejustboughtthis,mostofthemcomefromthepark.”
Thequotationabovereferstothemostcommonformofpermitfraudbeforethe
implementationofstricterregulationsandenforcement(Interviewswithlawenforcement
officialsandconservators,2013).Wildlifeprofessionalswouldusethesamepermittoshoot
anddehornmultiplerhinos.Or,aswasthecaseinsomeprovinces–mostnotablyinthe
northernLimpopoProvince,wildlifeprofessionalscouldusea“standingpermit”forwhite
rhinohuntsoncertainproperties.Inotherwords,huntingoutfittersappliedforablanket
permitonceandafterthattheyhuntedwithoutfurtherpermitsandstatesupervisionon
thesepropertiesuntilAugust2008(Milliken/Shaw2012:38,Interviewswithwildlife
professionals,2013).
6.2.1TheGroenewaldgang
Theprevioussectionreferredtothealleged“rhinohornsyndicatekingpin”Dawie
Groenewaldandhisaccomplices,knownastheGroenewaldgangorthe“Musinagroup”.333
Therhinopoachingsyndicatefaces1736countsofracketeering,moneylaundering,fraud,
intimidationandillegalhuntinganddealinginrhinohornsinSouthAfrica(Rademeyer2012)
whiletheUSindictmentallegesthattheGroenewaldsiblings(seeearliersection)soldillegal
huntstoUStrophyhunters.AccordingtotheSouthAfricancriminalindictment(comparewith
NationalProsecutingAuthority2011),Groenewaldandhisaccompliceswereinvolvedin
intricatescams,rangingfromfalsepermitapplicationsthroughtoillegaldehorningofrhinos
andthelaunderingofunregisteredrhinohorns.Rhinosandrhinohornswereacquired
333MusinaisabordertownintheLimpopoProvince.DawieGroenewald’sfarmcalledPrachtigislocatednearMusinaandmostoftheSouthAfricanwildlifeprofessionalswithdirectlinkstohiscriminalnetworkliveinthetownornearby.
268
throughavarietyofgrayandillegalchannels.Thecourtcaseislikelytoresumein2016after
severalpostponementssincetheinitialarrestsofgangmembersin2011.334Amongst
Groenewald’sco-accusedarewildlifeveterinarians,professionalhunters,apilot,farm
labourersandtwowives(hisownandthewifeofwildlifeveterinarianKarelToet),335who
assistedwiththepermitapplicationsandotheradministrativetasks.TheGroenewaldgang
enteredintobusinessventureswithrhinofarmersandwildlifeprofessionals,manyofwhom
wereunawarethattheywerebreakingthelawatthetime.Whatrendersthiscaseinteresting
isthedemonstrableinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegality.Thefollowingsectionprovidesa
fewexamplesoftheGroenewaldgang’sactivitiesbasedonSouthAfricancourtfilesandthe
USindictment.
GroenewaldhuntednumerousrhinosillegallyonhisfarmPrachtiginthenorthernLimpopo
Province(theindictmentallegesthathekilled59ofhisownrhinos)andprocuredliverhinos
andrhinohornsfromotherrhinofarmers.Itisallegedthathedehornedrhinosandsoldat
least384rhinohornsoverafour-yearperiod(Jooste2012).Theroleofprofessionalhunter
NardusRossouwiscentraltoillegalandpseudo-huntshunts(seealsonextsection)conducted
onPrachtigandotherhuntingreserves,aswellasobtainingrhinosandhornsonbehalfofthe
gang.Groenewald’slistofrhinoandrhinohornsuppliers,andserviceproviders(game
capturers,transporters,hunters,butchers,etc.)readslikealistofthe“who’swhointhe
wildlifeindustryofSouthAfrica”–includingthenamesoftheworld’sbiggestrhinobreeder
JohnHume,MarnusSteylwhocollaboratedwiththeLaotianXaysavangnetwork(discussedin
detailbelow)andtheKrugerNationalParkassupplierofliverhinos(comparewithNational
ProsecutingAuthority2011).IntermsoftheNationalEnvironmentalManagementof
BiodiversityAct(NEMBA),separatepermitapplicationshavetobetenderedtodehorna
rhino,totransportrhinohorns,aswellastopossessrhinohorn.AccordingtoColonelJooste’s
334Thecourtbidtogetthedomesticmoratoriumonthetradeinrhinohornlifted(seeChapter5)ledtolatestcourtpostponementintheGroenewaldcase.Prosecutorsbelievethatthemerits(orlackthereof)ofthatcasearelikelytoimpacttheoutcomeoftheGroenewaldcase.335WhileSarietteGroenewaldandMarizaToetweretheadministratorsandbookkeepersofthesyndicate,thefactthattheyarethewivesoftwocentralplayersinthenetworkisemphasizedherebecausetheirfamilytiesrenderthemtrustworthy,andimportantassets.
269
affidavit(Jooste2012:14),336theGroenewaldgangfloutedtheserulesonnumerous
occasions.Thecarcassesofrhinosthatwereallegedlyillegallyhunted,killedanddehornedon
Prachtigwereeithersoldtoalocalbutcher,337buriedorburnt(Jooste2012:11).
Aninnovativemethodinvolvedthere-saleortradeexchangeofdehornedrhinos.JohnHume,
forexample,allegedlyaccepted14dehornedrhinosinrespectofadebtowedtohimby
Groenewald(Jooste2012:76-77).KarelToet,Groenewald’sveterinarian,dehornedtherhinos
beforethelivebutdehornedanimalsweresoldtofellowrhinobreeders.Hewasalsoin
chargeoftranslocatingandsellingrhinosthathadbeendehorned.Severalhundredrhinos
wereallegedlydehornedandtheresultanthornswerelaunderedintolegalorgraysupply
chains.GroenewaldandToetdidnotonlydehornrhinosonGroenewald’sfarmPrachtigbut
arebelievedtohaveoffereddehorningservicestofellowrhinobreedersacrossSouthAfrica.
Toet’swifeMarizaandGroenewald’swifeSarietteappliedandfalsifiedpermitsfor
translocationsanddehorningofrhinos(e.g.usingthesamemicro-chipnumbersagain,using
expiredpermitsorswappingpermits).338TheirrolesintheGroenewaldsyndicateshouldnot
beunderestimated,astheywereallegedlyresponsibleformultiplefraudulentpermit
applications.Thesealsoincludedapplicationsforrhinotranslocationsthatneveroccurred
(withtheobjectiveofhidingillegallydehornedrhinos)throughtoapplicationsfor
translocationsofdehornedrhinoswithoutseparatepermitsfor‘missing’rhinohorns,which
shouldhavebeenregisteredaspartofGroenewald’sprivatestockpile.Thetwowivesare
heavilyinvestedinthebusinessventuresoftheirhusbandsasshareholders,bookkeepers,and
administrators.339DirectfamilytiestocentralfiguresintheGroenewaldgang,aswellasthe
women’sfinancialandcriminalinvestment(culpability)helptoresolvethecoordination
problemofsecurity.Throughtheclevermanipulationofpaperwork,thewomenwere
responsibleforthesafeand‘legal’transferofillegallyobtainedrhinohornfromlegitimate
336ColonelJohanJoosteheadstheEndangeredSpeciesUnitattheDirectorateforPriorityCrimeInvestigations(DPCI),SouthAfrica’sorganizedcrimefightingunit.33739carcassesweresoldtoalocalbutcherbetween2008and2010.338Whenarhinoisdehorned,thehornhastobemicro-chippedandregisteredwithnatureconservationofficials.339SarietteGroenewald,forexample,holdsa50%stakeintheprivatecompanyCatfishInvestments59.SheistheonlymemberoftheclosedcorporationValinorTrading142CC.ThegangusedValinorforthefinancialaspectsof‘OutofAfricaSafaris’andValinorTrading.
270
rhinobreedersandwildlifeindustryplayerstoAsianmarkets.Theadageof‘bloodisthicker
thanwater’isofimportancehere.
Insomeinstances,Groenewaldandhiscolleaguesfailedtonotifynatureconservationofficials
beforemovingrhinostootherpropertiesdespitebeingexplicitlyorderedtodoso,thus
bypassinginspectionsthatwouldhaveidentifiedfraudulentpermitapplications.Inanother
incident,theGroenewaldgangallegedlytriedtoobstructthecourseofjusticebyoffering
bribestoaninvestigatingofficertoloseacasedocketregardingtheunlawfulpossessionof
elephanttusks.OneofGroenewald’sassociateshaddeliveredthetuskstotheVietnamese
ownerofawarehouseattheChinaMallinJohannesburg(Jooste2012:66-67).When
fraudulentpermitapplicationsfailed,thegangwouldthusattempttocorruptrelevantpolice
ornatureconservationofficialsasacontingencyplan(anothersecurityprecautiontoresolve
thecoordinationproblemofsecurity).Groenewaldwasarrestedforanillegalleopardhunt
andexportoftheleopardtrophyintheUSin2010.WhileunderhousearrestintheUS,he
allegedlyinstructedfellowsyndicatememberTielmanErasmustostageahousebreakingon
hisfarm.Hesuspectedthatenvironmentalmanagementinspectorswouldinspectthefarmin
hisabsenceandfindnumerousdehornedrhinosbutnorhinohorns(Jooste2012:12).
Groenewald’sattempttocachehisillicitactivitiesthroughstagingahousebreakingfailed,
andformspartofthestate’sindictmentagainsthimandhisgang.
Groenewaldhadstrongsocialnetworkswithfellowmembersofthewildlifeindustryin
southernAfricaandbeyond(includingtheUS)whowerewillingtoconductbusinesswithhim.
Theexistenceofsocialtiesthatstretchedbeyondhisimmediatesocialnetworkgave
Groenewaldthecompetitiveedge(comparewithMorselli2001:228).Sociallyembeddedin
thesouthernAfricanwildlifeindustrywithstrongbusinessconnectionstotheconsumer
market(Vietnam),aswellasextensiveknowledgeofthetricksofthetrade,Groenewaldwas
inanexcellentpositiontoprocurehighvolumesofrhinohornthroughgrayandillegal
channels.Manyhornprocurementmethodscrossedthefinelinebetweenlegalityand
illegality.Whilefellowwildlifeindustryplayersoftenthoughtthattheywereactingwithinthe
ambitofthelawwhentransactingwiththegang,Groenewaldandhisassociateswerefully
awareoftheregulationsandhowtobypassthem.Althoughitwasillegaltohuntanddehorn
rhinoswithouttherequiredpaperwork,thegangmanagedtoselltheircriminalandgray
271
activitiesaslegitimatebusinessenterprises.Tosomebusinesspartners,tradingrhinoorrhino
hornswithGroenewaldatthedomesticlevelappearedtobelegitimate.Moreover,the
privatizationofrhinosandtheentitlementtodo‘asyoupleasewithyourownproperty’
allowedmanycriminalandgrayactivitiestogoundetectedforseveralyears.Itisparticularly
surprisingthatGroenewaldconductedbusinesswithagentsofthestate(heboughtrhinos
fromtheKNP),evenaftertheDirectorateforPriorityCrimeInvestigations(DPCI)had
commencedwithProjectCruiser,aninvestigationintohisfraudulentandcriminaloperations.
Thecomplicityofwildlifeprofessionalssuchaswildlifeveterinarians,helicopterpilots,
professionalhuntersandfellowrhinobreedersfacilitatedthegang’sactivities.
6.2.2Thepseudo-huntingphenomenon
AnothercreativewayofsupplyingAsianconsumermarketswith‘legally’attainedrhinohorn
involvedhuntersoriginatingfromcountriesthathavenotraditionorcultureofsports
hunting.Incontinuationofcolonialbiggamehuntingandsafaris,themajorityoftraditional
rhinohuntersheraldfromEuropeandNorthAmerica(Interviewwithprofessionalhunter,
2013;datasuppliedbyPHASA,2013).Asoftheearly2000s,anewbreedofhuntersarrived
onSouthAfricanshores(seeGraph4).YoungVietnamesenationalswithnooralimited
(sometimesfalsified)trackrecordoftrophyhuntingbookedwhiterhinohuntswithSouth
Africanoutfitters.IntermsofCITESstipulationsanddomesticlawsinSouthAfrica,huntersare
allowedtoshootonewhiterhinopercalendaryearwhiletheannualquotaforblackrhinosis
restrictedtofiveanimals.Thesehuntingtrophiesmaybeexportedashuntingmemorabiliafor
non-commercialuse.Vietnamesecrimegroupstogetherwiththeirlocalintermediaries
recruitedVietnamesecitizensasstand-introphyhunterstobypasstheruleof‘onewhite
rhino,perperson,perannum’.Theirrolewashencetoposeastrophyhuntersforthe
purposesofcompliancewithpermitregulationswhileaSouthAfricanprofessionalhunter
wouldshoottherhinoontheirbehalf.ItismandatoryintermsofSouthAfricanlawthata
SouthAfricanprofessionalhunterandanofficialfromnatureconservationaccompanyeach
rhinohuntingparty.Theprofessionalhunterisonlysupposedtodispatchtheso-called‘kill
shot’ifthehunterasperthehuntingpermitfailstokilltherhinowithhisorherfirstshotand
theanimaliswounded.
272
Graph4:Nationalityofhuntersapplyingforwhiterhinohuntsjuxtaposedagainsttheaveragepriceoftrophyhunting,2004-2011
Source:GraphextractedfromMillikenandShaw(Milliken/Shaw2012:53);datacompiledbyMichaelKnight(No
huntingpermitdatawasavailablefor2008)
Knownas“pseudo-hunting”,alawenforcementofficialexplainsthephenomenonasfollows
(Interview;2013):
“Whenthedemandgrew,theydecided:let'sgoandhuntrhinos.AsaPH[professionalhunter]andanoutfitter,youneedtosellyourhuntsasapackage.Itisacontractwithrequirements.ThereisnohuntingofferedinVietnam.TheydonothavefirearmsandtheydonotbelongtoahuntingfraternityandthereisnohuntingfraternityinVietnam.SowhythehellwouldyoucometohuntarhinoallthewayfromVietnam?Withalltheseguidelinesthatyouhave,theyarenothunters.Icanshowyoupicturesofpeoplethatsupposedlygohuntinginhighheels.Andifyoucheckallthesehuntersinvolvedinthesetrophyhunts,theyarebetweentheagesof26and32.Ifyoucomparethattotheirincome,thenyouaskyourselfwhatdoesitcosttobeahunter?Whatdoesitcosttohuntarhino?Theyareshotinlessthanhalfanhour;theypaycash.Theypayforthathuntbetween500,000and1millionRand340–onlyforthehorn.Whathappenstothosetrophies,theysupposedlygotothetaxidermist.Andthentheygetlostinthesystem.Loadsoftaxidermistsarecomplicit.Theyusethesystemtodefraudthestate.Ahunterhuntsformemorabilia.Butwhatdotheseguysdo?Theyhuntforcommercialexploitation,whetheritisforlibationcuporforstatusinthecountry.Iftheyareinvolvedinpseudo-hunts,thefarmersbuyrhinosatauctionsandinlessthan48hourstherhino'sshot,fromauctiontograve.”
340Thisamountsto47420€to94950€.
273
TheCITESregulationsbanthecommercialexploitationofrhinohorn;rhinotrophieshave
hencetobeexportedandstayintact(asopposedtotheexportofthehornsonly,piecesof
hornorpowderedhorn)andtheymaynotbetradedcommercially.Theonlypermissibleuse
ofarhinotrophyisthusashuntingmemorabiliainthetrophyhunter’sprivatecollection.
Whilerhinohornobtainedthroughpseudo-huntingpassedasalegalflowoutofSouthAfrica
initially,lawabidingwildlifeprofessionalsandconservationofficialsbecamesuspiciousonceit
becameapparentthattheyoungSoutheastAsianhunterswerestand-in’stoobtainrhino
hornthroughlegalchannels(Interviews,2013).Theafore-mentionedTOPSregulationsalso
targetedthisillegalpractice.Theresilienceandcreativityofrhinotraffickersisapparentinthe
employmentofnewstrategiestobypassregulationsandthelaw(seenextsection).
Officialrecordsshowthattheexportationof‘legally’attainedrhinohornfromSouthAfricato
Vietnamwasprevalentthroughoutthe2000s.TheCITESTradeDatabase(Graph5)providesa
registeroflegallyexportedandimportedrhinotrophiesandotherrhinoproducts(suchas
rhinotailsandgenitalia)fromSouthAfrica.VietnamesehornimporterswereusingCITES
exportpermitstoimportmultiplerhinohornsonthesamesingle-useexportpermitto
Vietnamuntilitsexpirationdatewasreachedaftersixmonths(Milliken/Shaw2012:58).
Graph5:SouthAfrica'sofficiallyreportedexportdataversusVietnam'sofficiallyreported
importdataofrhinohorn(2003-2010)
Source:CITESAnnualReportDataprovidedin(Milliken/Shaw2012:59)
274
AccordingtoannualexportandimportdataprovidedtoCITES,Vietnamacknowledgedreceipt
ofabout25%ofthelegallyimportedrhinohorntrophiesbetween20003and2010.This
discrepancysuggeststhatapproximately487of657‘legal’rhinohornsenteredtheillegal
marketinVietnam(Milliken/Shaw2012:58).Asrecentas2012,SouthAfricareportedthe
exportof16rhinohornsand13rhinotrophiestothesoutheasternAsiancountry.Aboutthe
former,Vietnameseauthoritiesconfirmedtheimportof28horns(adifferenceof12
additionalrhinohorns)andinreferencetothelatter,ofthe13trophiesonly1wasregistered
forimportationuponarrivalinVietnam(CITESTradeDatabase2012).Directexportsofrhino
trophiesfromSouthAfricatoVietnamstoppedentirelyby2013(CITESTradeDatabase2013).
Inexcessof400rhinotrophies(800horns)were‘legally’exportedtoVietnamfrom2003to
2012(Carnie2013).
6.2.3Thaisexworkersastrophyhunters
UnliketheVietnamesepseudo-hunterswhohadtobeflowninfromtheirhomecountry,a
Laotianwildlifetraffickingnetwork,usingafrontcompanycalled‘XaysavangTradingExport-
Import’,341employedaclevercost-savingmeasure.TheThairepresentativeofXaysavangin
SouthAfricarecruitedThaisexworkerswhowerealreadybasedinSouthAfricatoaccompany
himandhisSouthAfricanintermediariestoprivatehuntingreservesandfarmstoactas
stand-insfortrophyhunters.Thewildlifetraffickersthussavedonfinancingtravelcostsfrom
SoutheastAsiatoSouthAfrica.Alocalhenchman342trawledthroughJohannesburg’sstrip
341InvestigativejournalistJulianRademeyer(2012)providesadetailedaccountoftheXaysavangwildlifenetworkinhisbookKillingforProfit.ChumlongLemtongthaiwasrunningtheSouthAfricanoperationofthenetworkuntilhisarrestin2011andsubsequentconvictionin2012.Hewassentencedto40yearsimprisonment,whichwasreducedtoa30-yearsentenceonappealin2013(Tsoka/Levenberg2013).TheSupremeCourtofAppealheardthecasein2014andshortenedLemtongthai’ssentencetoaneffective13-yearprisontermandaR1millionmonetaryfine.Failingpaymentofthefinewouldleadtoaneffectiveperiodofimprisonmentof18years(Navsa/Wallis/Swain2014).342JohnnyOlivierthelocal‘handlanger’(helper)ofChumlongLemthongthaiturnedagainstthewildlifecrimenetworkandbecamethestarstatewitnessagainsttheThainational.Hispolicestatementandvariousinterviewswithjournalistsprovidedinsightintotheinnerworkingsofthenetwork.Hismotivationtoturnagainstthenetworkisdiscussedlaterinthissection.
275
clubsandbrothelsinsearchofThainationals343withvalidtraveldocuments,whichwere
neededfortheapplicationforhuntingpermits.TheXaysavangwildlifetraffickingnetworkhad
initiallyextendeditsoperationstoSouthAfricainabidtosourcelionbones,teeth,andclaws,
whichweresoldassubstitutesfortigerbonesintraditionalChinesemedicinepreparations.344
UponarrivalinSouthAfrica,thetransnationalcoordinatorandtransporterofthenetwork
ChumlongLemthongthaisawadvertisementsforBigFivehuntsincludingrhinoandinformed
hisbossofthis“businessopportunity”.Keentofund“anytradeinrhinohorn”,theLaos-
basedkingpinVixayKeosavangorderedLemthongthaito“makeinquiries”
(Navsa/Wallis/Swain2014:9,Interviews,2013).ThenetworkfirstappearedontheSouth
Africanpolice’sradarwhenfivemembersofferedtensofthousandsofDollarsforthreerhino
hornstoanundercoverpoliceofficerin2008(Connett2014).TheXaysavangnetwork’s
infamouspseudo-huntingschemecommencedinlate2010.Ofsignificancewasaclear
separationofduties.ThesyndicatesoughtoutSouthAfricanwildlifeprofessionalsand
conservationofficialswithapenchantfor“dodgydeals”thatwouldfacilitatetheirnefarious
activitiesbyavailingtheirservicesandprovidingunhinderedpassageofrhinohornoutofthe
country.Tothewildlifenetwork,cooperationwithSouthAfricanwildlifeprofessionals
involvedlittleeffortandoperationalrisk.However,the‘legal’exportofhuntingtrophies
involvedcomparablymoreadministrativeandorganizationalfootworkthanapoaching
excursionintoaprotectedareawould(Interviews,2013).
Thelocalorganizerofthesepseudo-huntswasaSouthAfricangamefarmerandsafari
operatorwhoemployedtheservicesofaprofessionalhuntertoshoottherhinosonbehalfof
theThaipseudo-hunters.MarnusSteylfirstsuppliedlionbonesandlaterprogressedto
343JohnnyOliviersuggestedthattheThaiwomenmighthavebeentraffickedtoSouthAfrica(Olivier2011:2).AnothercriminalactorlikewisemaintainedthattheXaysavangnetworkwasalsoinvolvedindrugandhumantrafficking(Interviewwithsmugglingintermediary,2013).344CriminalsyndicatesselllionboneastigerbonetounsuspectingconsumersinSoutheastAsia.Traditionallytigerboneiscookedupintoajelly-likesubstanceknownas‘tigercake’orimbibedas‘tigerwine’(InterviewswithTCMpractitioners,HongKong,HanoiandHoChiMinhCity,2013).Whiletheillegalsupplychainoflionbonewasnotthefocusofmyresearch,interviewswithrhinohornsmugglersandtradersindicatedthatwildlifetraffickerswereseldomspecies-specificbutincludeanumberofendangeredorthreatenedspeciesandothercontrabandintheirsmugglingbouquet.ThearrivaloftheXaysavangnetworkinSouthAfricacoincidedwithadrasticincreaseoftheofficiallyrecordedexportdataoflionbonesontheCITESdatabase,with386and645setsofbonesexportedfromthecountryin2009and2010respectively,whereasonly89setsoflionboneshadbeenexportedbetween2000and2008.Ofthosesets,75%wenttoAsiawiththe‘lion’shareof67,7%destinedtoLaos(Lindseyetal.2012:13),thehomebaseoftheXaysavangnetwork.
276
rhinos,arrangingrhinohunts,theremovalandweighingoftherhinohorns.Theliverhinos
werepurchasedatdiscountedpricesatauctionsasrhinofarmerswerestartingtooff-load
rhinosinthefaceoftheescalatingpoachingcrisis.Hewouldalsofindfarmersandoutfitters
whowerewillingtohosttheThaipseudo-huntingparty.UponreceivingtheThainationals’
passports,Steylwouldforwardthenecessaryinformationaswellascopiesofpassportstothe
outfittersorlandownerswhothenappliedontheirbehalfforthehuntingpermits
(Navsa/Wallis/Swain2014:9).TheThaisexworkersandstripperswouldaccompanythe
syndicatememberstogamereservesandhuntingfarmstoposenexttothedeadrhinos(see
Figure9)inexchangeforfreefoodanddrinksandR5000(475€)forthe“job”(Kvinta2014).
TheprofessionalhunterHarryClaassenskilledtherhinos,andSteylandhisfarmworkers
woulddehorntherhinosandtakecareofthecarcasses.OccasionallyLemthongthaioroneof
hisfriendswouldposeashunters(Olivier2011:6).SteylwaspaidR60000(6135€)per
kilogramofrhinohorn;thepricewentsubsequentlyuptoR65000(6646€)perkilogram
(supportingevidenceattachedtoOlivierpolicestatement).
Figure9:Thaipseudo-hunter
Source:providedbyPaulO’Sullivan
277
Accordingtothehuntingregulations,natureconservationofficialsoughttobepresentand
monitorallrhinohunts.TheDepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairsfailedtoprovideproper
supervisionofthesehunts(Navsa/Wallis/Swain2014:12–13)andLemthongthaiandother
membersofthesyndicateboastedlater“everyonehasapriceinSouthAfrica”(Interviews,
2013).Inhisrulingduringtheappealhearingstheappellatejudgecommentedonthe
incompetenceandpossiblecollusionofthenatureconservationofficials:
“Equally,therelevantgovernmentdepartmentcanrightlybecriticized,notonlyforlackofpropersupervisionoftheauthorizedhunt,but,ifthephotographsthatformpartoftherecordareanythingtogoby,itappearsthatatleastsomeoftheofficialsinvolvedprobablyknewthatthetermsofthepermitwerenotbeingmetandthatthestatedpurposeofthehuntwasfalse.Fromthephotographsitappearsthattheseofficialsshouldhaveknownthatthepersonspresentduringthehuntwerenotthepersonstowhomthepermitstoshootandkillrhinohadbeengrantedandwerenotintruthgenuinetrophyhunters.”
Olivier’spolicestatementwasmoredamninginprovidingalistofcontactsoftheXaysavang
networkwithintheNorthWesternnatureconservationdepartment,thecustomsandairports
authority,aswellaspliabletaxidermists(Olivier2011:9).Thesamenatureconservation
officialwouldbeon‘standby’tocometoSteyl’sfarmtobepresentduringthehunt,measure
thehorn,scanthechipinsidethehornandputthedetailsofthehuntintotheProfessional
HuntersRegister.Olivierwitnessedtheexchangeofbribemoneyoncebutthoughtthatthere
wasastandingarrangementinplace(Olivier2011:7–8).Theprovincialconservationofficial
appearstohaveassuredthenationalofficialsofthelegitimacyoftheapplications(Interview,
2013).
Lemthongthai’sThaiassociateinSouthAfrica,“themanontheground”ChunchomPunpitak
(Olivier2011:6)oversawthehuntingpartieswhileLemthongthaiwouldmonitorthehorn
shipmentsbetweenSouthAfricaandLaosandtheironwardjourneytoconsumermarkets
(Olivier2011:5).Thesyndicatereceived26permitstoshootandkillrhinosofwhichmost
hornswerefraudulentlyexported(Navsa/Wallis/Swain2014:4).Ataxidermistmountedthe
hornsondecorativeshieldstogivethemthesemblanceofrealhuntingtrophies,whichwere
thenshippedtoLaos.Lemthongthaifalsifiedthecustomsdocumentsbychangingthe
consigneeandcountryofdestination(Navsa/Wallis/Swain2014:4);thehuntingtrophies
278
shouldhavebeenshippedtothepermanentaddressoftheThaisexworkersandexotic
dancersinThailand.In2011,SouthAfricaninvestigatorsclosedinontheSouthAfrican
operationofXaysavangTradingExportImportCompanyLimited.Lemthongthaiandhis
associateswerearrestedandchargedwithtransgressingtheCustomsandExciseAct,and
contraveningagainsttheNEMBA,andabouquetofcrimeslinkedtothetransgressionofthe
PreventingofOrganizedCrimeAct(POCA)(TheRegionalDivisionofGautengKemptonPark
2012).
6.2.4TheresilienceoftheXaysavangnetwork
Astheleadresearchquestionofthisdissertationaskswhytherhinohasnotbeenbetter
protectedinspiteofmyriadmeasurestodisrupttheillegalmarketinrhinohorn,thearrest
andconvictionofLemthongthai,onthefaceofit,wouldsuggestthatthisisindeeda
successfuldisruptionofanillegalrhinohornsupplychain.WhywasLemthongthaiarrested?
Anddidhisarrestandhissubsequenttrialandthatofhisco-accused(whichincludedthe
gamefarmerSteylandprofessionalhunterClaassens)successfullydisruptthemarketforany
lengthoftime?Inresponsetotheformerquestion:JohnnyOlivier,theSouthAfrican
associatewhowasresponsibleforthe“administrativego-betweenactivities”(hewaspaidR
5000–475€perrhino)allegedlygotscrupleswhenhediscoveredanorderfrom
LemthongthaitoSteylforafurther50rhinos(100rhinohorns)and300setsoflion
skeletons.345Theteamwassupposedtokillanddehorn15rhinospermonth;theywould
receiveR65000(6646€)perkilogramofrhinohornandR10000(1022€)forlionskeletons
weighingmorethan10kg(Olivier2011:10).Olivierturnedstatewitnessandhisstatementto
privateinvestigatorPaulO’SullivanledcustomsinvestigatorstotheheartoftheXaysavang’s
SouthAfricanoperationbutleftthetransnationalsmugglingoperationandsupplychain
virtuallyundisturbed.Olivierandhisgirlfriendreceivedimmunityfromprosecutionand
enteredbrieflyawitnessprotectionprogrammebuthisbetrayaldidnotgounnoticed.345Oliviermadetheclaimaboutscruplesand“bloodmoney”toprivateinvestigatorPaulO’Sullivanandlaterinhispolicestatement(Olivier2011:10).InvestigativejournalistJulianRademeyerrelatesthatOlivierhadarathermurkypastanddubiousreputation(Rademeyer2012).HismotivationtoinformonthedealingsofXaysavangremainsunclear;however,thesuddenconcernforrhinoappearsoutofplaceaftersourcing100sofrhinosforthenetwork(Interviewwithintermediary,2013).
279
LemthongthaiallegedlyputoutanR100000(10225€)bountyontheirheadsandthecouple
startedreceivingveiledthreatsonsocialmediaandsuspiciousphonecalls.Apparently
Lemthongthaihadtakeneveryone’sphotoatapartyafewmonthsearlier.Shouldanyteam
member‘snitch’,thentheirphotowouldbesenttopeoplethatknewhowtotakecareof
snitching(Kvinta2014).WhilethedigitalcapturingofconspiratorssuggeststhatLemthonghai
triedtoresolvethecoordinationproblemofsecuritybywayofaninsurancepolicy,an
intricateandcomplexsecuritysystemappearstoprotecttheXayasavangnetwork.Asit
turnedout,ChumlongLemthongthaiwasassignedasthe“fallguy”whotooktheblameasthe
“director”oftheimport-exportcompany;Olivierhadhisdayincourtandlivedtotellthetale.
ChargesweredroppedagainstallofLemthongthai’sco-accused346afterhepleadedguiltyand
claimedthattheothershadnoknowledgeofhisillegaldealings.Lemthongthai’sfateandthe
consequencesofhisarrestassistinrespondingtothelatterquestion,whichrelatedto
whetherthearrestshadledtoasuccessfuldisruptionofthemarket.
Lemthongthai’sco-accusedgotoffscot-freetodeflectfromotherXaysavangdealings.
Theriskof‘gettingcaught’isconsideredanoperationalrisktowildlifetraffickersand
successionplanningandsecuringthecontinuityofthesupplychainisinherenttoany
successfultransnationaloperation,thusresolvingthecoordinationproblemofsecurity.The
networkhadseveralfallbackscenariosincaseofdetectionanddefectionofkeyplayers.
Lemthongthaihadleftanimpeccabledigitalrecordofhisbusinessdealings,347whichhad
assistedinvestigatorsandprosecutorsinputtingtheircasetogether.WhileLemthongthaimay
346TheNationalProsecutionAuthority(NPA)reinstatedthechargesagainstgamefarmerMarnusSteylin2012.Hefoughtforapermanentstayofexecution,whichwasgrantedinJune2015.347ItwouldappearrathernaïveofLemthongthaitoleavebehindsuchdetailedaccountsofhisbusinessdealings.Hewas,however,sureofthelegitimacyofhisdealingsinlightofhimattainingthe“right”paperworktomovetherhinohorns‘legally’outofthecountry.HebelievedthathewasactingwithinthelimitsoftheSouthAfricanlaw,whichpermittedThainationalstohuntrhinosandexportthehornstotheirhomecountry.WhilehewaspayingR60000toR65000perkgofrhinohorn,poachedrhinohornwouldenterthe“blackmarket”atacostofR200000tothepoachingorganizer.AlthoughLemthongthai’sallegedprofitmarginwaslessthanR100000perrhinohunt,poachingintermediarieswouldmakeaprofitofR450000perhunt(Interview,2013).Thepaymentstructuresarediscussedinmoredetailbelow.Itisnoteworthyhowpseudotrophyhuntingwaslegitimizedasthelesseroftwoevils.Moreover,whilethedigitalrecordonLemthongthai’slaptopprovidesinsightintothe‘pseudo-legal’dealingsoftheXaysavangnetwork,therewasnopapertrailoftheovertlyillegaltransactions.AccordingtosourceswithinthecriminalunderworldthatcooperatedwithLemthongthai(Interviews,2013and2014),thenetworkhadbeeninvolvedintheillegalkillinganddehorningofatleast700rhinosinsouthernAfrica.ThecourtcasesagainstLemthongthaiandassociates,however,dealtwithafewdozensofpseudo-trophyhunts(TheRegionalDivisionofGautengKemptonPark2012).
280
havebeenthedesignatedasthe‘fallguy’(andmoresobyvirtueofhisdigitalrecordkeeping
suggestingthathethoughthisapproachwasfailsafe),someofSouthAfrica’sfinestlegal
mindswereassignedtohiscase.348ThelawyersfirstfoughtintheHighCourtandlaterinthe
SupremeCourtofAppealforreductionstoLemthongthai’sprisonterm.Theinitial40-year
sentencewasfirstreducedtoa30-yearterm,andthentheSupremeCourtofAppealtookoff
afurther17yearsin2013.Lemthongthaiistoservea13-yearprisontermandpayafineofR
1million.Accordingtolawenforcementsources(Interviews,2013),Keosavangistakinggood
careofLemthongthai’sfamilyinThailandintheinterim,andhewillbegenerouslyrewarded
uponhisreleasefromprison.Byexoneratingtheothers,Lemthongthaiensuredthatnoneof
theotherco-accusedwouldreleaseprivilegedinformationaboutthenetwork’soperations
andthattheycouldcarryonwiththeirnefariousactivities.Thenetworkmanagedtoresolve
thecoordinationproblemsofcooperationandsecuritysuccessfullythroughLemthongthai’s
roleasintermediaryand‘fallguy’.Theseroleswerebasedonhisreputationasatrustworthy
criminalassociateandmutualtrustthatbothLemthongthaiandthenetworkwouldhonour
theirrolesinthe‘security’agreement(non-disclosureofoperationalsecretsversussupportof
next-of-kin).
Thesignificanceoftheresponsibilitiesandfunctionslinkedtotheroleofthelocalorganizer
needstobeunderscored:SteylisbutoneexampleofahandfulofsouthernAfrican
organizers349whoactasintermediariesbetweenthesupplyanddemandsideofthemarket.
TheseorganizershaveaccesstoinfluentialpoliticalandeconomicelitesinsouthernAfricaand
SoutheastAsia;Steyl,forexample,travelledtoThailandonseveraloccasions.Moreover,
SouthAfricanlawenforcementauthoritiesandtheirAsiancounterpartshaveevidencethat
SouthAfricanwildlifeprofessionalsandtheirrepresentativeshaveundertakenseveral
“marketingtrips”toVietnam(Interview,2013).Inessence,Steyl’sroleandfunctionasthe
localorganizerwithadirectconnectiontothesource(rhinohorn,lionboneandotherwildlife
products)isfarmorevaluabletotransnationaltraffickersthantheroleoftransnational348AccordingtokeyinformantsinterviewedinsoutheasternAsia,thenetworkfinancedLemthongthai’slawyers.JulianRademeyer(pers.communication,2016)believesthatgamefarmerMarnusSteylandassociatesfootedthelegalbillbutcouldnofindcorroboratingevidence.349Accordingtopoachers,lawenforcersandintelligenceoperators(Interviews,2013and2014),GroenewaldandRasarealsoorganizers.Thereisalsoanecdotalevidenceofthreewhiteexecutivesintheimport-exportbusiness(twoofSouthAfricanandoneofZimbabweandescent)operatefromMozambique.
281
transporters(inthiscaseLemthongthai’srole).WhileLemthongthaiwastheperson
responsibleforthetransnationaltransport(export/import)ofrhinohorn,lionboneandother
wildlifecontrabandfromSouthAfricatoSoutheastAsiauntilhisarrestandsubsequent
conviction,hisfunctionsanddutieswererapidlymovedtosomeoneelse.350
ThearrestandconvictionofKeosavang’s“deputy”(Rademeyer2014b)alsofailedtodisrupt
themarket.WhileitputanendtotherecruitmentofThaisexworkersastrophyhunters,
other‘legal’andillegalflowsofrhinohorncontinuetofeedthemarket.Aseparatecasein
KenyahaslinkedtheXaysavangnetworktoivorytrafficking(Fuller2013)351whileinterviews
indicatedthatthenetworkswereinvolvedinanumberofotherlegalandillegalflowsofrhino
horn,ivory,lionboneandotherwildlifeproductsoutofSouthAfrica,Namibia,Mozambique,
andTanzania(Interviews,2013).TheprimarymodusoperandioftheXaysavangnetworkis
theconversionofillegallyobtainedwildlifeandwildlifepartsintoseeminglylegalwildlife
commodities.Thenetworksmuggles1000sofwildanimalsandanimalpartstoLaoseach
year.KeosavangmaintainsanumberofcaptivebreedingfacilitiesandfarmsinLaos,from
whereillegallyobtainedwildanimalsoranimalpartsareexportedwithofficialLaotian
governmentpaperworkstatingthattheanimalsderivefromcaptivebreedingfacilities(Fuller
2013,InterviewwithStevenGalster,FreelandFoundation,2013).Dubbedthe“PabloEscobar”
ofillegalwildlifetrade(Rademeyer2014b),VixayKeosavanghaspowerfulnetworksextending
tothepoliticalandmilitaryeliteofthesoutheastAsiancountry(Gosling/Reitano/Shaw2014:
24).Theformersoldierturnedbusinessentrepreneurremains“untouchable”inhishome
countryofLaos(Gosling/Reitano/Shaw2014:23)despitetheUSissuinga$1millionreward
forinformationleadingtothedismantlingoftheXaysavangnetworkin2013.Evidenceat
Lemthongthai’strialhadincludedairwaybillsshowingthatsomerhinohornshadbeen
shippedtooneofKeosavang’saddressesinLaos–yet,thisevidencedidlittletodismantleor
disrupthiswildlifebusiness(Fuller2013).
350TheFreelandFoundationbelievesthatLoyChanthamvonga,ayoungwomanwhofrequentlytravelstoMozambique,isLemthongthai‘ssuccessor.ShewasimplicatedinarhinohornshipmenttoThailand,whichalsoinvolvedaVietnamesenationalandtwopoliceofficers(Rademeyer2014b).351TheKenyaWildlifeServiceandcustomsofficersseized260kgofelephantivoryand18kgofrhinohornatNairobiairportin2008.TheshipmentwasregisteredtoXaysavangImportandExportandboundforLaos(Connett2014).
282
6.2.5“Round-tripping”:Rhinohornintransit
Bythetimethelegalloopholehadbeenpluggedandatemporarybanhadbeenimposedon
Vietnamesetrophyhuntersin2012,anewbreedof“non-traditional”huntershadalready
slippedintotheregion.Czech,PolishandUkrainianhunterswerenowposingas“proxy”
huntersforcriminalgroupings;their‘huntingtrophies’were‘legally’exportedtotheirhome
countries.Fromthere,thehornswerepilferedintoillegalsupplychainstoVietnam
(Interviewswithlawenforcementofficialsandconservators,2013).InJuly2013,24rhino
hornswereconfiscatedand16suspectsarrestedintheCzechRepublic;anadditionaleight
hornswereseizedinSlovakia.Czechauthoritieschargedthegroupof16includingthree
Vietnamesenationals,withbeingmembersofaninternationalcrimesyndicateinDecember
2014.ThesyndicateisallegedtohavemovedrhinohornfromSouthAfricaviatheCzech
RepublicandSlovakiatoVietnam.Thispracticehasbeendubbed“round-tripping”(Bloch
2014).In2012,theCzechRepublicinformedCITESthatintermediarieswithcontactstothe
localVietnamesecommunityhadrecruitedCzechcitizensfromaspecificareainnorthern
BohemiatoactinstagedtrophyhuntsinSouthAfrica.LiketheVietnamesepseudo-hunters,
thesehunterswerenotregisteredmembersofanyhuntingassociation,possessednohunting
licensesorriflesandhadnoprevioushuntingexperience.Therecruiterspaidthetravel
expensesoftheCzechhunterstoSouthAfrica,contingentonthehuntersigningadeclaration
thatthehuntingtrophieswouldbesurrenderedtotherecruiteruponreturntotheCzech
Republic(CITESSecretariat2013:6).TheSouthAfricanpartners–Czechnationalslivingin
SouthAfricaandroguewildlifeprofessionalsassociatedwiththeearliermentionedDawie
Groenewald–arrangedthepermitapplications,huntsandexportoftherhinohorns.East
EuropeancustomsofficialshavelimitedexperienceinidentifyingAfricanwildlifecontraband,
aweaknesseasilyexploitedbywildlifesyndicates.TheCzechauthoritiesbecamesuspicious
uponinspectingrhinohornsthatwerenotmountedonatrophybutindividuallywrappedin
clearplasticandpackedintowoodshippingcratesandstampedwithanofficialSouthAfrican
CITESexportapproval.Anothershipmentofhornswasconcealedincustom-mademachine
parts(pers.communicationwithJulianRademeyer,2016).Accordingtotheairwaybills,the
hornsweretopassthroughtheCzechRepublicenroutethefinaldestinationofVietnam
(Bloch2014).TheCzechnetworkisallegedlyconnectedtoDawieGroenewald’s“Musina
group”aftermicrochipsinsomeoftheconfiscatedhornsweretracedbacktoseveralfarmsin
283
theLimpopoProvinceandhisnameandthenamesofhisco-accusedappearedonpermit
applications.
Morerecently,therehavebeensuspicionsthat‘traditional’hunters(notablyUSandRussian
nationals)werealsohuntingonbehalfofVietnamesegroups(Interviewswithwildlife
veterinarian3,2013).TheUSindictmentofDawieGroenewaldconfirmedthatUStrophy
huntershadindeedcollaborated(albeit“unknowingly”)withtheGroenewaldsiblings.
6.2.6Theimpactofpseudo-huntingonpricestructuresandtrustissues
Thepriceof‘legalhunts’surgedafteritbecameapparenthowlucrativethiseconomic
exchangewas.AccordingtoAdriKitshoff,formerchiefexecutiveofficer(CEO)ofthe
ProfessionalHuntersAssociationofSouthAfrica(personalcommunication,2015),352theprice
rangedbetweenUS$40000andUS$50000perhuntin1995to2000,andfrom2001to
2005itcostbetweenUS$50000and$65000perhunt(comparewithGraph4).Pseudo-
huntingincreaseddrasticallyfrom2008,andsodidthepriceforlegalrhinohunts.Atypical
rhinohuntwouldcostbetweenUS$90000toUS$110000attheheightofthepseudo-
huntingphenomenonbetween2008and2011.TheentryoftheVietnamesehuntersintothe
trophyhuntingmarketalsoledtoashiftinpricevaluationbyrhinoownersandoutfitters,
whostartedchargingperinch,andinsomecases,perkilogramofhorn.Thelengthorweight
oftherhinohornhenceaffectedthetotalpriceofrhinohunts.OncetheTOPSregulations
werepromulgatedandadjustedtoaddress,amongstothers,theissueofpseudo-hunting,the
pricecamedownslightlybeforesurgingagain.Mostrhinoownersandoutfitterscontinueto
chargeperinchinlieuofquotingforarhinohuntirrespectiveofthelengthorweightofthe
horn.In2015,huntingoutfitterswhodidnotownlandorrhinoswerecharging$3500(3125
Euros)353perinch,whichincludesthetotalamountdisbursedtotherhinoowner.Typicallya
352AdriKitshoff,theformerCEOoftheProfessionalHuntersAssociationofSouthAfricamadeavailablethequantitativedataprovidedinthisparagraph.353TrophyhuntsareusuallyquotedinUSDollars.ThisispartiallylinkedtothehighnumberofAmericantrophyhunterssupportingtheSouthAfricanhuntingindustry,andmajorhuntingexhibitions,showsandauctionssuchastheDallasSafariClubhappenonUSsoil.
284
hunterwouldpay$91000(81250Euros)toahuntingoutfitterforarhinothatcarries26-
inchhorns.354Wildlifeprofessionalsinvolvedinthehuntingindustryhavetakentodefining
rhinosintermsofthelengthoftheirhorns–typicallyarhinothatcarriesa26-inchhornis
describedasa“26-inchrhino”(Interviewswithwildprofessionals,2013;seealsoChapter4on
thesaleofliverhinos).
Whilethenewpricestructurebasedoninchesofhornbecameamarket-relatedstandardin
thewildlifeindustry,trustissuesledtoafurtheradaptationofremuneratingfarmersand
outfittersforrhinohuntsaccordingtotheweightofhorn.Somecriminalactorsinsistedon
dispensingpaymentonlyoncetherhinohadbeenshot,dehornedandthehornshadbeen
weighed.Interviewswithwildlifeprofessionals,rhinoownersandaprominentintermediary
ofarhinotraffickingsyndicaterevealedgreatlevelsofdistrustbetweenrhinoownersonthe
onehand,andlocal“handlangers”355andtheirAsianconnectionsontheother.Farmerswho
hostedpseudo-huntsandengagedinhornlaunderingknewthattheyhadnorecoursetolegal
protection,shouldtheircriminalassociatesdecidetodefaultonpayments,defraudor‘rat’on
them.IntermediariesandtheirAsianassociateswereconcernedaboutgettingrealhorn(as
opposedtofakehorn,whichisprevalentandwidespreadbothonthesupplyanddemand
sideofthemarket)andgettingsufficienthornforthepricetheywerepaying(Interviewswith
hornsmugglersandintermediaries,2013).Intheaftermathofthefirstpseudo–hunt,
Lemthongthaiexpressedbuyer’sremorseforhavingpaid“toomuchmoney”forthetworhino
hunts.Hethendecidedthat“weshoot,wecut,weweigh,thenpay”(Olivier2011:4).Infact,
Lemthongthaiwouldonlypaythemoneythreetofourdaysaftertherhinohadbeen
dehornedtoensurethattheweightofthehornhadstabilizedfrom“moistureloss”(Olivier
2011:6).
Itisinterestingthatillegalmarketpricingstructuresaffectedthelegaltrophy-huntingsector.
Legalactorsfollowedsuitbyvaluingrhinosintermsofinchesandgramsofrhinohorninstead
ofsellingrhinohunts.Offurtherinterestistheagencyofhornsuppliersinco-determiningthe
354Thepricemayalsovaryaccordingtothelocationofthehuntingreserveandthesizeoftheland(theappealoftheexperience).Somerhinohuntsin“premierareas”whererhinosare“wild”or“freeranging”willsellformorethan$150000(AdriKitshoff,personalcommunication,2015).355Afrikaanswordforhelperor‘hangers-on’.
285
priceofrhinohorn,suggestingthatnotonlythesacredvaluationofrhinohorninconsumer
marketsbutalsothesecuritypremiumassociatedwithsecuringthesupplychain(converting
illegallyobtainedrhinohornintoseeminglylegalrhinohornthroughpermitfraud)and
disbursementstolegitimatewildlifeprofessionalsplayaroleinthehighpriceofrhinohorn.
Lawenforcementofficialsandpolicereports(Interviews,2013;documentsinthepossession
ofresearcher)confirmthat“rhinotrophies”exportedfrompseudo-huntsandillegalhunts
consistedofthehornsonly.Thesaleofrhinohuntsperinchorkilogramrevealsyetanother
expressionofcontestedillegality,wherewildlifeprofessionalsandtheirclientsdisregardthat
rhinohornisnotatradablecommoditypermissiblebythelawoftheland.Therhinoisvalued
intermsoftheweightorlengthofitshorns,effectivelyrendering“arhinoworthmoredead
thanalive”(Interviews,2013).
6.3Cooperation:TheAfrican-Asianconnection
Wildlifeprofessionalsincludingjobcategoriessuchaswildlifeveterinarians,professional
hunters,gamecapturersandtransporters,natureconservationofficialsandhelicopterpilots
actedonoccasionasthe‘go-between’orintermediaryofrhinofarmersandAsianbuyers.This
intermediaryfunctionwasnotonlyimportantinconnectingpotentialbuyers(Asiannetworks)
withsuppliers(rhinofarmers),butitalsoputdistance(anadditionalnode)betweendifferent
stagesofthesupplychain.Theintermediarywasthe‘fallguy’should‘somethinggowrong’
duringabusinesstransaction.Inessence,theintermediaryprovidesprotectionforboththe
supplierandbuyerthusresolvingapotentialfalloutduetodistrustoneitherside.Asian
buyerswerecarefultochooseintermediariesthateitherhadagoodreputationandsocial
capitalwithintherhinoownercommunity,orwildlifeprofessionalswhowereknownas
mavericks,therebyresolvingthecoordinationproblemsofcooperationandsecurity.Where
rhinoownersoroutfittershadtheirdedicatedbusinessconnectionstoconsumermarkets
(discussedinmoredetailbelow),theroleoftheintermediarywassuperfluous.ASouth
Africanwildlifeveterinarianwhohadbeenrecruitedtoidentifyrhinofarmerswillingtohost
whiterhinohuntswithVietnamesepseudo-huntersontheirlandsaid:
286
“The discussions [the informant refers to ameetingwith an alleged rhino poachingkingpin]centredaroundthepossibilityofacquiringwhiterhinofor“legal”huntsandhelpingthemtoget intouchwiththerightpeople. IhadtosourceplaceswheretheVietnamesehunterscouldhuntrhino.Theidealrhinohadtobeolderrhinobullswithbigbackhornsandthefronthornsneededtohavebigbasescontributingtoaheavierweightand largerprofit. Itwasallabouttheweightandnotaboutthe lengthofthehornsorthetrophies.ThepurchasepriceatthattimewasbetweenR40000-00toR60000-00perkilogram[4120Eurosto6175Eurosperkilogram].356Thiswasonlyforthehorns.Thehuntingpricewillbedeterminedbytheweightofthehornsafterthehunt.Iwouldhavereceived3%to5%commissionbasedontheweightoftherhinohornsafter the hunt. The paymentswould have been in cash. Iwas only to source rhino.[NameofSouthAfricanintermediary]usedhisownProfessionalHunters...[…]…Theserhinohuntswereonly for the rhinohorns andnot for the trophy. [TwoVietnamesegentlemen]wereresponsibleforgettinghuntersfromVietnamandtheyactedasthelink between South Africa and Vietnam. [The South African intermediary] was alsoresponsibleforobtainingthepermitsinSouthAfrica.”
Incaseswherethestatehasnoorlimitedknowledgeastoactualrhinonumbersinareserve
oronafarm,therewas(andcontinuestobe)noneedforrogueoperatorstoapplyfor
huntingpermitsorcommitpermitfraud.Thesecrecygoverningrhinonumbersandreserve
locations(seeearliersectionon‘putandtake)allowssuchoperatorstogoabouttheir
businesswithnodetection.Thisbreedofrhinofarmersandwildlifeprofessionalstendsto
havetheirown‘pipeline’toAsianmarkets,andintermediarieswereinfrequentlyused
becausetherewasnoneedforthem.Lawenforcementofficialsregardtheseoperatorsas
“particularlyclever”astheydidnotgetinvolvedwith“organizedcrime”(Interviews,2013).357
TheinitialconnectiontoAsiantradersandconsumershappenedeitherthroughhistorical
tradeconnections,358marketingtripstosoutheastAsiaorexistingoremergingbusiness
relationshipswithnationalsordiplomatsofconsumercountriesresidentinSouthAfricaor
oneoftheneighbouringrhinorangestates(Zimbabwe,ZambiaorNamibia).Theadvantageof
356Theinformantwasreferringtoeventsthathappenedin2010.357Arguablythecriminalactorsinvolvedinthisspecificflowconstituteanevolvedformoforganizedcrimewherepossibleinterruptionofthesupplychainiskepttoanabsoluteminimum.Thelevelofsophisticationisachievedbyinvolvingafewtrustedactorsonlywhohavethemeansandcontactstosupply,procureandtransportrhinohornatlowcostandminimumrisk.358ConsumermarketsinAsia,MiddleEastandNorthernAmericahavereceivedrhinohornsourcedfromAfricanrhinosforseveralcenturies.Historicaltradeconnectionsinthisinstancerefertotheestablishmentoftraderelationsbetweensanctionbusters(theinternationalcommunityimposedeconomicsanctionsonapartheidSouthAfrica),apartheidmilitaryintelligenceoperativesandroguewildlifeprofessionalswhotradedivoryandrhinohornforweaponsandammunition.
287
thedirectconnectionbetweentherhinoowner,orthewildlifeprofessionalwithaccessto
rhinohorn,andtheAsianconsumeristhatthesupplychainoutofthecountryis
comparativelyshorterthanintheothersetups.Theserelationshipsarebasedonmutualtrust
involvingactorsofsimilarsocio-economicbackground,socialcapitalandaccesstoinfluential
andpowerfulpoliticaloreconomicelitesatthesourceandinthemarket.
6.4Contestedillegality:LegitimizingregulatorybreachesThenotionofcontestedillegalityisarecurringfeatureintherhinohornsupplychainacross
differentflows,wherethelegitimacyoftherulesand/orrule-makersisquestioned,orcultural
frameslegitimizeillegalorgrayeconomicactivities.Thelackofacceptanceofillegalityor
whatisreferredtoasthenotionofcontestedillegality–inthiscase,non-acceptanceofthe
tradebananddomesticregulationsgoverningthehuntingandmanagementofrhinosand
theirhorn–isemployedasalegitimizationdeviceforillegalorgrayeconomicactivities
involvingrhinohornintheprivatesector.Wildlifeprofessionalswhoareinvolvedintheillegal
rhinohornsupplychainexpressedsentimentsofunfairness,impracticabilityandhostilitywith
regardstotheCITESandTOPSregulations,aswellasthemoratoriumonthedomestictrade
ofrhinohorninSouthAfrica(seealsoChapter5).Inessence,thenarrativerelatingtothe
regulationoftheindustryhasbecomea‘chickenandegg’debateofwhether(over-)
regulationledtoillegaleconomicactivitiesinvolvingrhinohornorviceversa.Asexplainedin
Chapter4,stateauthoritiesprivatizedrhinosinordertoincreasethetotalconservationarea
inSouthAfrica,tocreatemultipleviablerhinopopulationsandtospreadtheriskofdisease
andextinction.Thefirstrhinosweresoldtoprivateindividualsandcorporateentitiesinthe
late1960s.CITESinstitutedtheinternationaltradebanonrhinosandtheirproductsin1977.
Asoneoftheoriginalsignatoriesofthetreaty,SouthAfricawasrequiredtodomesticateand
implementthetradeban,whicheffectivelyhappenedinthelate2000s.CITESgrantedsome
leewayasprovisionsweremadeforthenon-commercialexchangeofwhiterhinotrophiesin
theearlyyearsofthemultilateralenvironmentaltreaty.TheConvention,thelinkedtradeban
anddomesticregulationsbecameathornintheeyeofmanyrhinoownersandwildlife
professionalswhowantedfreereignandagencytodeterminewhathappenedtotheir
288
“property”and“investment”,especiallyoncepropertyrightshadbeenconferredandclearly
articulated(Interviews,2013).
Inessence,theCITEStradebanwasinterpretedasadeliberatestumblingblock,whichwas
“outoftouchwiththerealitiesoftheAfricanbush”(Interviewwithconservator3,2013)and
“dictateduponAfricanconservatorsbypowerfulanimalrightslobbiesandgreenieswithin
CITES”(Interviewwithrhinoowner11,2013).Interviewswithroguewildlifeprofessionals
(includingrhinoowners)portrayedtherhinohorntradebanasoneofmanyprohibition–
basedsystemsthatfailedtoenforceitsstatedobjective–inthisinstance,theregulationof
wildlifetradeandavoidanceofspeciesextinction.Theargumentprofferedisoneof“where
thereisademand,thereisasupply–andifit’snotthefarmerwhoconservesandhelpsthe
rhino,thenitwillbethepoacherthatmeetsthedemand”(Interviewswithwildlife
professional3,2013).Theroleofthestateisminimalinthisnarrativeastoallowfor
‘unfetteredmarketexchanges’inwhichself-interestedindividualsrealizetheirfulleconomic
potential,andwhere‘theinvisiblehand’ofthemarketdeterminessupplyanddemandbyway
ofpricingmechanisms.Thenotionofcontestedillegalitybecameanimportantelementof
legitimizingillegaleconomicactivities,assoonastheCITEStradebanwasinstituted,and
continuestolegitimizeunderhandandillegaleconomicactivities.
OncetheSouthAfricanstatehadidentifiedirregularnon-conservationorientatedactivitieson
privateland,piecemealregulatorycontrolswereintroducedinthelate1970sand1980sin
preparationofSouthAfrica’sbidatCITEStogetrhinosdown-listedfromAppendixI(total
tradeban)toAppendixII(partialtradeban),andsubsequentattemptstoallowforcontrolled
legaltrade.TheSouthAfricangovernment’sleadingargumentwastoincentivizeprivaterhino
ownerstocontinuebreedingrhinosonprivateland.CoPdecisionsallowedtheexportof
whiterhinotrophiesasof1979;whiterhinoswerethenmovedfromAppendixItoAppendixII
in1994,andby2004,NamibiaandSouthAfricaweregrantedanannualhuntingquotaoffive
blackrhinos.
Chapter5andearliersectionsofthischapterreferredtotheTOPSregulations.The
regulationswerenotonlyaimedatbringingSouthAfricannormsandstandardsintunewith
therequirementssetoutbyCITESbutalsotocloseloopholesthathadbeenpreviously
289
exploited.Originallytheregulationswerepromulgatedin2008;however,duetothe
phenomenonofpseudo-huntingandtheidentificationofadditionalloopholes,theregulations
wereamendedandupdatedin2013(Interviewwithgovernmentofficial5,2013).WhileDEA
officialsmaintainthatprivaterhinoownersweresufficientlyconsultedaheadofthe
promulgation,privaterhinoownersfeltthattheirconcernsandcomplaintswerenot
sufficientlyconsidered.Thesentimentsexpressedbytherhinoownerbelow(Interviewwith
rhinoowner2,2013)mirrorthenarrativeofmanywildlifeprofessionalsinterviewedforthis
research:
“Oneofthethingsisyou’retheowneroftherhino.Thatmeansyouowneverythingonit,thehornorthebodypartsbelongstoyou.Butifthatrhinodiesandyouobtainthehorn,thenyouneedthepossessionpermitwhichisfinebyme.Youcannotpass-onthehorntosomeoneelse,notevenyourchildren.Sowhatmustyoudowithit?Youarenotallowedtodonateit,youarenotallowedtosellitandyouarenotallowedtokeepitinyourhousewithoutapermit.Soitisaworthlessthing.Whymustyouprotectaworthlessthing?WhenIdie,itwillbeaproblem,itwontevenbepartofmyestate.”
Priortotheendoftheapartheidregime,thestate’smainfocuswasaimedatassistingprivate
rhinoownerswhereastheattentionhasshiftedtoincludetheinterestsoflocalcommunities
livinginoradjacenttoconservationareasinthepost-apartheidregime.Commercialfarmers–
rhinoownersareincludedhere–wereapowerfullobbywithintherulingNationalParty
duringtheapartheidregime.Farmershaddirectconnectionstotheprovincialnature
conservationbureaucraciesandrepresentativesinparliament,therebyinfluencingdecisions
pertainingtotheirinterests.Theirstatusasmembersorassociatesofthepoliticaland
economicelitebegantochangeduringthe1990s.Strongpoliticaltiestotheapartheid
regime,economicprivilegesandsupport,andexploitativelabourrelationsonsomefarmshad
contributedtolarge-scalesocialengineeringinSouthAfrica’sruralareasandupheldthesocial
structureandeconomicpowerbaseoftheapartheidstate.Thechangeinthepoliticaland
economicstatusoffarmerswasnotonlylinkedtothepoliticaltransformationinSouthAfrica
butmacro-economicchangesintheglobalarenasuchasmarketderegulationandthe
weakeningoftheSouthAfricanRand.Largergamereservesandgamefarmsthatoffertrophy
huntingandecotourismwerelargelyunaffectedbybroaderpoliticalandeconomicchangesas
SouthAfricahadmorphedintoatopdestinationfortrophyhuntingandecotourismafterthe
290
endofapartheid.Foreignhuntersandtouristsprovidedreadyaccesstoforeigncurrencyand
contributedtothegrowthoftheeconomy.
Interviewsheldwithabouquetofwildlifeprofessionals(farmers,gamecapturers,wildlife
veterinarians,taxidermists,anti-poachingpersonnel)revealedacontradictoryandparadoxical
relationshipwithstateactorsaftertheendofapartheid.Ontheonehand,thesupportofthe
statewasneededtomaintainlandandrhino(andbroaderwildlife)ownershipprivileges;on
theother,thechangingoftheguardsignalledthatitwasnotgoingtobe‘businessasusual’
andthatpoliticaltransformationmightleadtothelossofatleastsomeprivileges.
Interestingly,gameandhencerhinofarmingofferedanescapeclausefrompossibleland
claims359andtrickylabourrelations(seealsothesectiononprivatizationinChapter4).
Moreover,sincerhinoshadbeendeclaredaprivateproperty,theycouldbetranslocatedto
othergamereservesorfarmsthatwerenotsubjecttolandclaimsorcomplicatedlabour
relations.Insomeinstances,wildlifeprofessionalslegitimize‘offthebooktransactions’and
thecircumventionofregulationsasaformofresistancetothenewpoliticaldispensation.
Resistancetothenewregimeislinkedinparttoperceptionsofincompetenceandcorruption
ofthenewelite,“unfair”labourlawsandregulations(farmworkersenjoyednolabour
protectionduringapartheid),thethreatoflandclaimsandtheincreasingincidenceoffarm
attacks.Onerhinoownersaid(Interviewwithrhinoowner6,2013):
“Iwanttoaskyouanotherquestion.TheMinisterofHealthofanycountry–whomustthatbe?Youthinkitcanbeafarmerordoyouthinkitmustbeadoctor?AstupidfarmerlikemeknowsthattheMinisterofHealthmustbeadoctorforhe’sgotalltheknowledge.Howcansomebodythatdoesn’tevenownabloodylizard,canmakelaws,canorganisetheenvironmentandtelluswhattodo?”
Theresistancetoregulation(portrayedas“over-regulation”bysomewildlifeprofessionals)is
alsolinkedtoasenseofdeprivationofagency.Increasedstateinterventionbywayofrule-
making,strictorpartialimplementationandenforcementoftheruleshasaccentuated
tensionsbetweenthewildlifesectorandthestateinthepost-apartheidperiod.Theapartheid
statehadfacilitatedtheestablishmentofgamereservesandfarmsbyprovidingfarmersand
wildlifeentrepreneurswithsupport(e.g.subsidiesandpropertyrights).Wildlifeownershad
freereignovertheirmovableandimmoveableassetswithlittleregulatoryinterferenceor359TheSouthAfricangovernmenthasopenedalandclaimsprocessforpeopleandcommunitiesthatweredispossessedtheirlandafter1913(CommissiononRestitutionofLandRights2015).
291
disruptiontoeconomicexchanges.Inadditiontootherexistentialthreatstotheformerstatus
quo,thepost-apartheidstateisassociatedwithintroducingnewrules,whicharebelievedto
aimatdispossessingandemasculatingthewhitefarmer(Interviews,2013).Sentimentsofa
lossofprivilege(therighttodeterminewhathappenstotheirproperty),deprivationand
entitlementwereexpressed:“thegovernmentisouttogetus”.Agovernmentofficial
(Interviewwithintelligenceofficer2,2013)recountsanencounteratameetingofrhino
owners:“Youaremakingusallpoor.Wenolongerhaveincomefromharvestingthehorn.”
Whilethemajorityofthearound400rhinofarmersandrhinoreserveownersappeartobein
favouroflegalizingthetradeinrhinohorn360andhenceconformtothenewrules(Taylor,
Andrewetal.2014,personalcommunicationwithPROA,interviewswithprivaterhino
farmers,2013),thereareaselectfewrhinofarmersandassociatedwildlifeprofessionalsthat
continuetofloutregulationsandengageinillegalandsemi-legaltransactionsinvolvingrhino
horn.Thoseinfavouroflegalizationcite,amongstothers,therisingcostsofsecuringrhinos
onprivatelandandtheprivatesector’s“enormouscontributiontorhinoconservation”.The
costofsecuringrhinoshasindeedsnowballedandislikelytosurgefurtherascriminalactors
canvasnewmethodsandsecurityactorsconceiveofnewcountermeasures.Buijs(2002:37;
1996)hadpointedtothelackofsecuritymeasurestosafeguardmanyprivaterhinoowners’
“goodinvestment”inthe1990sand2000sbeforepoachinghadbecomeanissueofconcern.
Bytheendof2014,privaterhinoownerswerespendingaround272millionSouthAfrican
Rand(20millionEuros)perannumonrhinosecurityinadditiontothecurrentgovernment
expenditureinexcessof1billionSouthAfricanRand(75millionEuros)(Jones2014).Rhino
ownersarenowcallingonthegovernmenttoassistwiththeprotectionofrhinosonprivate
land.Smallergamefarmsandreservesthatdonotattractsufficientinternationaltrophy
huntersortouristsstruggletomeettherisingsecuritycosts.Thelegalizationnarrativefurther
suggeststhatrhinofarmersshouldberewardedbyallowingthemtoreapfinancialrewards
fortheireffortsthroughthere-openingofthetradeofrhinohorn.
Inconclusion,contestedillegalityintheseflowsoftherhinohornsupplychain,ontheone
hand,relatestodissatisfactionwiththeinternationalregulatoryregimeandnational
regulationsinSouthAfrica;andontheother,thereiscontemptandlackofrespectforthe
360Iinterviewedafewrhinoownerswhoopposetradeproposals.
292
rule-makersandenforcersoperatingbothattheinternationalandnationallevel.The
perceivedillegitimacyoftherulesandrule-makersfunctionsasalegitimizingmechanismthat
permits(providesagencyfor)actorstobreakorbendtherules.Asubsetofthislegitimizing
mechanismrelatestothenormativeaspectsoftherules.Totheroguewildlifeprofessional
(usedasanumbrellatermhere),thecontestationofthebanalsorelatestothevaluationof
rhinohornasahighlyprofitablecommodity.Theintrinsicvalueoftherhinoasawildanimal
worthyofprotectionforthecommongoodissecondaryinthisinstance.Inborrowingfrom
theconservationdiscoursethatportraysprivateownershipofrhinosasaconservation
strategy,theroguewildlifeprofessionallegitimizeshisorherillegaleconomicactivitiesin
termsofcontributingtoconservation.Whathappensbehindhisorhergamefenceshould
escapefromthestate’sscrutinyandinterference,whichiscontingentuponthecommunityof
privaterhinoowners(thosethatfollowandthosewhoflouttherules)keepongrowingthe
numberofrhinosconservedonprivateland.
6.5ConclusionAkeyfeatureofthesegrayflowsistheexploitationoflegalandregulatoryloopholesasactors
rideontheedgeoflegality.SouthAfricanwildlifeprofessionalsandrhinobreederswhoform
partofthecountry’swhiteeconomicelitearetheprincipalactors.Regulatorybreachesand
theexploitationoflegalandregulatoryloopholes,includingillegalhuntinganddehorningof
rhinos,aswellasthestockpilingandlaunderingofillegallyharvestedrhinohornintolegal
tradeflowsconstitutemodesof‘production’.Whatrenderstheseflowsparticularlyefficient
andsafeistheearlystageconversionofanessentiallyillegalgoodtolegalstatus(the
launderingofillegallyharvestedhornintolegaltradeflows),andcontrariwise,theconversion
ofalegalproduct(thehuntingtrophy)intoanillegallytradedgoodinconsumermarkets.The
earlyconversioncurtailsopportunitycostsandrisksfurtherdownthesupplychain.Froman
illegalmarketactor’sperspective,thismodeofobtaininghornisnotonlythesafestand
modestexpedientmethodbutitalsominimizesthenumberofintermediariesrequiredfrom
thepointoforigintotheconsumermarket.Thisbringsdownoperationalcostsandincreases
theprofitlikeinotherlegalandillegalbusinesses.Italsoallowsalargelyunhinderedpassage
ofthehornthroughtheminimalexposuretosocialcontrolactors(nationalandinternational
293
lawenforcementagents)andmeasuresaimedatdisruptingthemarket.Moreover,thehorn
staysinitsoriginalstate,meaningitisnotprocessedintosmallerpiecesorpowderform
beforereachingtheconsumermarket.Thisissignificantwhenitcomestoqualitycontrol,
valuationandpricingofthehornontheconsumermarket(seeChapter8).
Thesignificantroleofsomewildlifeindustryplayersinrhinoextinction(asopposedtorhino
conservation)isnoteworthy.Whilepublicattentionhasbeendrawntorhinopoachingin
publicparks,rogueelementswithinthewildlifeindustrywerethecatalystforpoachingto
increaseinnationalandprovincialparks(discussedinmoredetailinChapter7).Itis
importanttonotethatgrayflowsarenotseparateanddisconnectedfromotherlegaland
illegalflows(seealsoChapter7).Thesameactorsand/ortheirsocialnetworkshaveavested
interestinorinfluenceonotherflows.
294
Chapter7:Poachingrhinos:Illegalflowsofrhinohorn
“I’mshootingforthemoney(Poacher,Cubovillage,2013).”“YouknowIwasn'tborntohuntarhino.Inthevillage,wehuntthesmallanimals.Youknowtheguysinthevillages;theydon'thuntthebiganimals.Theywantfreshmeat.Theyonlyhuntfortheday.Normally,theykeepbiganimalssafe.Thereisnofridge.Andthelandusedtobefreelongago,nowthelandisnotfree.Ican’tjustgoanywhere;otherwisetheguywillstartfightingwithme.Andhewillsaythisismylandandwewillstartfighting.Governmentcanstopthisthing;theyjustmustgivepeoplejobs.Crimeiseverywhereandthepoliceisshootingusall(Poacher16,SAcorrectionalcentre,2013).”
7.1IntroductionThischapterdrawsoninsightsfromChapter4,whichdealtwiththehistoryofconservation
andassociatedprotectionparadigms.Theearlierchapterservedthepurposeof
demonstratinghowthesocialarchitectureandengineeringofthecolonialandapartheid
dispensationsledtothelossoflandownershipandancestralburialgrounds,aswellas
propertyandhuntingrightsoftheindigenousandlocalpeoplesofSouthAfricaand
neighbouringcountries.TheKrugerNationalPark(KNP),SouthAfrica’sflagshipnationalpark,
otherpublicparkslikeHlhuluwe-ImfoloziandMkuzeintheprovinceofKwaZulu-Natal,and
privately-ownedreservesandfarmsacrossthecountryhavebecomethesettingofwhatis
oftendescribedas“awartosavetheworld’slastrhinos”(Interviews,2013and2014).Ofthe
approximately21000remainingrhinos361inSouthAfrica–19300arewhiterhinosand
approximately1700animalsbelongtotheblackspecies(Milliken2014:15).Between8394
to9594whiteand343to487blackrhinosremainintheKNP(Ferreiraetal.2014:1).362
Rhinonumbershavebecomeacontestedissue,tyingintopublicpolicydebates,and
conservationandfundraisingagendasofvariousconservationNGOsandprivateoperators.361MillikencollatedrhinonumbersfromIUCN/SSCAfRSGdatathatwaslastupdatedon13October2013.In2015,conservators(personalcommunication,2015)estimatedthatthetotalnumberofrhinoshaddroppedto19700animalsofbothspeciesinSouthAfrica.362Thefiguresrelatetoapopulationsurveyundertakenin2013.Surveyorsusedhelicopterstocountrhinosin878randomlyselectedblocksofthreesquarekilometresinsize(Ferreiraetal.2014:1).Afollow-upsurveywasundertakenin2014.The2015surveydeterminedthattheKNPishometo8,400to9,300whiterhinos,accordingtonumbersreleasedbytheSouthAfricanMinisterofEnvironmentalAffairsEdnaMolewaattheendofJanuary2016.TheMinisterdidnotprovidenumbersforblackrhinopopulationshousedintheKNP(Molewa2016).
295
ThefactthattheKNPishometothegreatestnumberofrhinosinSouthAfricaremains
uncontested.RoughlythesamesizeasWalesorIsrael,theKNPstretchesacrossanareaof
closeto20000squarekilometres.TheParkextends350kilometresfromnorthtosouthand
about60kilometresfromeasttowest(KrugerNationalPark2015).Itsharesitsnorthern
borderswithZimbabwe,andMozambiqueextendsalongitseasternboundary.Since2001,
theKNPformspartoftheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark(GLTP),whichjoinsKrugerwith
GonarezhouNationalParkinZimbabweandtheLimpopoNationalParkinMozambique
(KrugerNationalPark2015).FlankingthewesternboundaryoftheKrugerParkandcovering
closeto2000squarekilometresareprivategamereserves(knownundertheumbrellaterm
ofAssociatedPrivateNatureReserves(APNR),comparewithChapter4).363Anotherlayerof
privategamereserves,aso-called‘bufferzone’islocatedalongtheeasternboundaryofthe
KNPandsouthoftheLimpopoNationalPark(hereafterLNP)inMozambique(discussedinthe
casestudyontheLNPinChapter4).SouthAfricancorporates,privateindividualsand
shareholdingcompaniesleasetheseconcessionsfromtheMozambicangovernment.364
ThecreationoftheLNPiscontextualizedasapost-colonialconservationinitiativethat
perpetuatesthesocial,economicandpoliticalalienationandmarginalizationofrural
communitieslivinginandthenearthepark.Asaconsequence,theperceptionhasemerged
thatwildanimals,andtherhino,inparticular,arevaluedhigherthanlocalpeople.Moreover,
thechangedconservationstatusoftheLNP(frommulti-usetototalprotection)hasledtothe
furthereconomicmarginalizationofvillagecommunitieslivinginsideorontheedgeofthe
Park.Withoutanyeconomicallyviablealternativeavailabletothem,thisconstellation
providesanever-growingpoolofvillagerswillingtorisktheirlivestohuntrhinosontheother
sideoftheinternationalboundaryseparatingSouthAfricafromMozambique.Whilethe
363Groupsoffreeholdlandowners,corporateandindividualconcession-holdersownthesereserveswithtraversingrights.AnimalsareabletofollownaturalmigratoryroutestoalimitedextentasfencesbetweentheprivatereservesandKrugerhavebeentakendown(Frommer2015).364AlllandinMozambiquebelongstothestateandthuscannotbeownedorsold.However,the“rightofuse”ofthelandcalledthe“direitodeusoeapproveitamentodaterra”(DUAT)titlecanbeacquiredfor50yearsandisrenewableforanother50.Theinfrastructureandbuildingshencecanbeownedandresold.MostforeigninvestorsseeklocalpartnershipsorregisteralocalcompanyinMozambique(Wester2015).ThegamereserveslocatedalongtheKNP/MozambicanborderarepredominantlyownedbySouthAfricancorporatesorshareholdingsinpartnershipwithMozambicancitizens.ThesepoliticallyconnectedgeneralsandpoliticiansasserttheirinfluenceinMaputoshouldconflictarisebetweentheconcession-holdersandlocalcommunities(Interviews,2013).
296
dominantconservationnarrativefocusesonWesternconservationideals,whichassumea
tensionbetweenwildanimalsandlocalcommunities,theearlierchapterhadcalledfora
nuancedreflectiononhowtheframingofconservationmightcarryitsownseedsof
destruction.Thenarrativeof‘human/wildlifeconflict’hascreatedanenvironmentthatis
conducivetotheriseofself-styledRobinHood-typesocialbanditswhoseillegaleconomic
activitiesarebothsociallysanctionedandembeddedwithinvillagecommunities.TheKNPas
theepicentreofthe“poachingcrisis”,andtheLNPandMozambicanvillagesimmediately
adjacenttotheKNP,whicharethe“springboard”forthemajorityofillegalhuntingparties
intothePark,servedasthemainresearchsitesforthischapter.Itisagainstthisbackground
thatthefollowingchapteranalysestheroleofkeyactors,theirroleandfunctionintheoverall
marketstructure.Itwillbearguedthatrhinopoachingisnotonlyacrimedrivenbygreedand
impoverishmentbutalsomotivatedbyenvironmentalandsocialjusticeprinciples.The
facilitationroleofkingpinsandsmugglingintermediariesenablesthecontinuityofthis
particularillegalflowofhorn.Thechapteralsodrawsondatacollectedatotherpublicparks
andreserves,aswellasprivategamereservesandfarmsforcomparativeandillustrative
purposes.
7.2Diffusion,expansionandadaptationofflowsfrom2008onwardsThefollowingsectiondealswiththeemergingsupplystructuresandflowsofrhinohornfrom
thelate2000sonwards.Thepreviouschapterprovidedinsightintoflowsofrhinohorn
locatedattheinterfaceoflegalityandillegality.Bundledtogetherwiththeillegalpoachingof
rhinosinrangestatesnorthofSouthAfrica,thesesub-legalflowsconstitutedtheprincipal
supplyarteriesofhorntonorthernandAsianmarketspriortothelate2000s.Whilegray
channellingcontinues,currenthornsuppliesderivepredominantlyfromtheillegalhunting
anddehorningofrhinosinnationalparksandprivategamereservesinSouthAfrica.The
transformationfromgraychannellingtoillegalhuntingoccurredin2008whenpoaching
statisticsspikedfrom13rhinodeathsin2007to83in2008(seeTable1).Thesurgein
poachinginSouthAfricacamelaterthaninZimbabwewherethefirstsignsofthecurrent
poachingcrisisappearedin2003when44rhinowerepoached.Thesepoachingincidents
297
coincidedwiththelandreformprogrammeandmayhavealsocontributedtothespillover
intoSouthAfricalater.
ThespikeappearstohavecoincidedwiththepromulgationoftheTOPSregulationsinthe
sameyear.WildlifeprofessionalshencecorrelatethespikeinillegalhuntingwiththeTOPS
regulationsandthesubsequentmoratoriumonthedomestictradeinrhinohorn(which
becameeffectivein2009,seeChapter6)andsuggestthat“organizedcrime”enteredthefray
once‘legal’actorswerepreventedfromtradinginrhinohorn.Asdemonstratedinthe
previouschapter,theseso-calledlegalwildlifeactorsbearallthehallmarksoforganizedcrime
agentsandcertainlymeetthedefinitionalcriteriasetoutinthePalermoConvention
(discussedinChapter1).Asamatterofempiricalevidence,‘organizedcrime’(intheformof
wildlifeprofessionals,militaryandpoliticalelites)hasbeenpartandparceloftheillegaland
graysupplychainsofrhinohornsincethebushwarsofthe1980s.
Thesuggestedcorrelationtallieswiththenotionofwhatlawenforcersandcriminologistscall
the“ballooneffect”.Thetermreferstothegeographicdisplacementofcriminalmarketsasa
reactiontopolicyorlawenforcementinterventions(Windle/Farrell2012:868).Accordingto
themetaphoremployedhere,oncethestatesqueezesoneendofalatexballoon,itwillbulge
elsewhere(TransformDrugPolicyFoundation2011:4).Infact,SouthAfricanpolice
investigators(Interviewwithlawenforcer5,2013)employthemetaphoroftheballoon
effect:
“WeallknowabouttheVietnameseconnection,peopleusingdiplomaticvehicles…Thesmugglingrouteschangedwhenweputpressureontheairports.Itisexactlythesameastheballooneffect.Ifyousqueezeoneside,theballoonisjustgoingtopopsomewhereelse.Krugerstartedsqueezingtheirpoachers,andthentheypopupbymeorinLimpopoandelsewhere.Themomentwestartsqueezing,theymoveback.Whenyouputpressure,theywilllookforeasiertargets.Mozambiqueisaneasiertarget.Namibiaisanopenquestion.”
Thenotionofaballooneffectfeedsintoanumberofparadigmsandnarrativesincluding
critiquesofdrugprohibition,notionsofhow‘organizedcrime’isstructured,andhowit
operates.Proponentsofdruglegalizationpointtothegeographicdisplacementofcannabisor
cocaplantationsinSouthAmericawhenanalysingthelackofsuccessincurbingdrugsupplies
intheinfamous“WaronDrugs”(TheEconomist2014).Insteadofcurbingacriminalactivity
298
andillegalmarkets,lawenforcementmovescriminalactorsandillegalmarketselsewhere
(TransformDrugPolicyFoundation2011:4).Theliteratureonorganizedcrimepointstothe
adaptability,planningandforesightoforganizedcrimeactors.Thelawenforcementadageof
“organizedcrimeisalwaysastepaheadofthepolice”referstoaproverbialgameof‘catand
mouse’inwhichthecat(lawenforcement)isrelegatedtoacatch-22situationandis
ultimatelydestinedtofail.Thus,thesuggestedcausalrelationshipofthestate’sintervention
versusanon-stateactor’spre-emptiveevasionofsuchinterventionssuggeststhe
hypotheticalinvincibilityandsuperiorityofthenon-stateactor–inthiscase,thenon-state
actorreferredtoisorganizedcrime.Organizedcrimemovesonto“weakerjurisdictions”even
beforetheballooniseffectivelysqueezed(TransformDrugPolicyFoundation2011:869).
Accordingtothisparadigmandassociatedpolicynarratives,365thereislittlehopeforthe
effectivedisruptionanddismantlingofillegaldrugmarkets,andhence,legalizationor
decriminalizationisofferedasanappropriatepolicyframework.Criminologistshaveoffered
nuancedviewsontheballooneffectdemonstratingbothnegativeandpositiveimpacts(see
forexample:Windle/Farrell2012).Moreover,agrowingbodyofscholarlyliterature
(Nadelmann1990;MacCoun1996;Raymond/Raymond2004)pointstothemeritsand
weaknessesofprohibition-basedsystems.
Withregardstothecurrentinquiry,ashortcomingrelatestothedeterministicand
paradoxicalassumptionsunderpinningtheparadigm.Tosuggestthatthethreatofstate
interventionandtheexecutionthereofleadstodefectionordisplacementoforganizedcrime
equatestothedenialofotherpermissivefactors–environmental,structuralandactor-driven
–leadingtothesameorasimilaroutcome.Itishenceimperativetoinquirewhycriminal
actorschoosetomoveoperationsorareswayedupontheproverbial“squeezingofthe
balloon”.Thefirstlineofinquiryrelatestowhetherthesameactorsareinvolvedorwhether
adifferentsetofactorsseizesaformofcomparativeadvantagebyoperatingfromadifferent
location.Ifitwerethesameactors:Aretheypushedorpulled?Doesthemoveconstitutea
‘causeandeffect’scenarioorisitachoicetheymake?Afurtherlineofinquiryrelatestowhy
365Thereareempiricalstudiesthatdisputetheinvincibilityoforganizedcrimeanddemonstratethatspatial,temporalortacticaldisplacementcanleadtopositiveoutcomesincludingdeterrentandcascadingeffects(Windle/Farrell2012:871).Moreover,amulti-pronged,transnationalandmulti-sectorialapproach,whichincorporatescooperationwiththosenegativelyandpositivelyaffectedbyorganizedcrime,hasbeenshowntodisruptillegalmarkets(Interviewwithwildlifecrimeinvestigator,2015).
299
thismovewasnotmadeearlier–especiallyinreferencetothesuggestionthatcriminalactors
onlymoveto“weakerjurisdictions”oncetheystarttofeeltheheat(Windle/Farrell2012:
869).Moreover,canthedisplacementbepinpointedtoaspecificpointintime,wasit
staggeredoveraperiodoftime,ordiditleadtoaprocessoftransformation?
Thepreviouschapterexaminedwhythedomesticandinternationaltradebanslacksocial
legitimacyamongstrhinofarmersandwildlifeprofessionals.Thelegitimationdeviceof
“contestedillegality”hasbeendiscussedthroughoutthedissertation.Callsfortrade
legalizationcommencedshortlyaftertheinceptionoftheCITESbanontheinternationaltrade
inrhinohorn.Curiouslyupuntil2009,legaldomestictradewaspermissibleinSouthAfrica.
Theratherliberalinterpretationofwhatconstituted‘legal’economicactionssuchasthe
exploitationoflegalloopholesandunder-ornoreportingofstockpiles,werealsohighlighted
intheearlierchapter.Thedomesticmoratoriumhasledtoacrescendoofprotestagainst
boththeinternationalanddomesticban,occasioningtheSouthAfricangovernment’scurrent
investigationwhethertoconsideraproposaloflimitedtradeattheCITESCoP17in2016.
Proponentsoftradelegalizationarguethatoncefarmerswerebannedfrom‘legally’tradingin
rhinohorn,thetrademovedunderground,effectivelyaidingandabettingillegalhunters
ratherthan“rhinobreedersandconservators”(Interviews,2013).366Thisviewignoresa
numberofotherfactorsthatinfluenceddiffusionanddiversificationofhornsuppliesand
traffickingroutes.Whilethestrengtheningofregulationsledtothedefectionofsomerogue
rhinoownersandwildlifeprofessionals,367organizedillegalhuntingdidnotemergeoutofa
vacuumleftbythedefectors.Rogueelementswithinthewildlifeindustrywerethedirectand
indirectcatalysts(‘firemakers’)forafewearlypoachinggroupstoemergeinMozambique
andSouthAfrica.Insomeinstances,poachinggroupsemulatedillegalpracticesofthewildlife
andconservationindustry(e.g.farmlabourersandrangerswholefttheirformeremployers
366TheSouthAfricangovernmenthassetupaCommitteeofEnquirytolookintotheviabilityofalegaltradeinrhinohorn.PublichearingswereheldattheendofMarch2015.Amotleycrewofrhinofarmers,conservatorsandactivistsreflectedonthestrengthsandweaknessesofaregulatedtradeinrhinohorn.Theirpresentationscanbefoundathttps://www.environment.gov.za/event/deptactivity/committeeofinquiry_rhinopoaching_workshop#workshopagenda(accessed26March2015).367Oncethestatehadspelledoutthatitwasillegaltotradeinrhinohornorallowsuspicioushuntingpartiesontoone’sproperty,lawabidingactorswerenolongerwillingtocooperatewithhornintermediaries.
300
pickeduponthetricksofthetrade,andforgedtheirownbusinessconnectionstoAsian
markets).Or,roguewildlifeprofessionalsrecruitedpoachersbyprovidingtoolstohunt
(huntingrifles)andconnectionstohornbuyers(explainedinmoredetailbelow).Thecausal
inferenceof“over-regulation”or“tradebans”leadingtoanescalationofpoachingthusneeds
tobecriticallyinterrogatedasitdisregardsanumberofparallelprocesses.
Firstly,theideathatpoachersfilledavoidsuggestsnaivelythattherewereeithernoother
illegalmarketparticipantspriortotheregulations,orthatrogueelementswithinthewildlife
sectoracceptedstateinterventionandceasedallillegalorsemi-legalactivities.Inessence,the
notionof“fillingthevoid”orthe“trademovedunderground”suggestsmarketfailureand
terminationofgrayflows;inotherwords,thestatemanagedtosuccessfullydisruptthe
marketandformermarketparticipantswereeither“neutralized”(arrested)orceasedall
illegalorsub-legalactivities.Moreover,thereisalsoanassumptionthatallrhinosuppliers
werecompetinginanopentransparentandlegalmarket,onlysellinghorntoSouthAfricans.
Thisviewdiscountsthatillegalhunting,stockpilingandhornlaunderingwastakingplace
despitedomestictradebeingpermitted.Asdemonstratedinthepreviouschapter,illegal
hunting,dehorning,stockpilingandhornlaundering(whichwasillegalbefore)continuesin
theprivatesectorregardlessoftheregulationsandthemoratorium.However,anorganized
crimeinvestigatorconcedesthefollowing(Interviewwithlawenforcer14,2013):
“Well,theywillratherdothebusinessinMozambiquebecausethereisnolegislation.Itisbettertobecorruptthere,it'sbettertoexportthere.Andcomingbacktotherhinohornstocksoftheprivaterhinoowners,someofwhomarefacingcriminalchargesnow.Theyareabitreluctanttoparticipatebecausetheydon'tknowiftheseguysaregoingtosayweknowtheseguys,we'vetradedwiththem.It’slikeopeningacanofworms.”
Secondly,thereisanimplicitassumptionthatafewwildlifeprofessionals,rhinofarmersand
AsianwildlifetraffickersheldmonopolycontroloverrhinohornsuppliesoutofSouthAfrica,
benefittingallthosewillingtodobusinesswiththem.Wasthereaquasi-verticalintegrationof
legal,semi-legalandillegalflowsofrhinohorn?Hypotheticallyspeaking,ifahierarchical
structurewereinplacewithahandfulofactorspullingthestringsinahighlyconcentrated
market,thenlawenforcementcouldhaveeasilydisruptedillegaltraffickingofrhinohornand
301
dismantledthemarketbynow.368Ifonlyafewactorsweretocontrolthemarket,theywould
havetoenforcemarketcontrolbywayofassertingcoercivepowers,ortherewouldhaveto
beinsuperablebarrierstoentry,whichexcludepotentialcompetitorseitherstructurallyor
economically(Steinberg2005a:9).369Followingthislogicandconsideringthehighprofits
associatedwithrhinohorn,newmarketentrantswouldhavetocompeteforapieceofthe
“rhinohornpie”.Noevidencecouldbefoundsuggesting‘turfwars’betweentheAfrikaner
cliquesofrhinocriminals(theso-called“boeremafia”),the‘newbreed’ofpoaching
syndicatesactiveinnationalparksandgamereserves,andrhinohornthieves.Infact,aswill
beshowninthischapter,therewerehighlevelsofcooperation.
Insteadofmarketcaptureoftheonegroupofactorsandmarketexitoftheother,
cooperativeallianceswereformed(thesectionontheroleofkingpinswilldiscussthe
pathwaystocooperationinmoredetail);andwhilesomealliancesweatheredthetestoftime
andpossibleconflictduetoheterogeneoussocialstructuresandweaklinks,othersdissipated.
InadditiontotheentryofMozambicancriminalentrepreneursandtheirhuntingcrews,other
AfricanhuntingteamscrossedintoSouthAfrica,andcriminalactorsactiveinotherillicit
marketsdiversifiedtheirbouquetofcriminalactivitiestoincluderhinopoaching.SouthAfrica
offeredopportunitystructurestoforeignhuntingcrews,andmoresoasrhinonumberswere
beingdepletedintheircountriesoforigin.ApoacherfromZimbabweexplains(Interview,
2013):
“Itwasnotmentionedtome,itwasarumour.Thereweresomepeoplethatknewthisitem.Weusedtokillthembutwedidnotknowwheretosellthem.Peopleusedtogetthemfromusfornexttonothing,forafewdollars–youknow.Thatwasin2007.Thenwecontinued,weusedtobargainwiththosebuyersandtheyusedtohikethepricebitbybitinordertolureusintothis.ThebuyerswereChinese–ofcourse.NoEnglish,noGerman,noanyothernation.Vietnamese,wehavejustheardaboutthembutwehavenotsoldanytothem.MostofthemaretheseChineseguysinJohannesburgthat
368Thisdiscountsthepossibilityofcooperativealliancesbetweenlawenforcementandillegalmarketactors.369Inhisanalysisofillicitabalonemarket,Steinberg(2005a:9)suggeststhatillicitmarketmonopolyisassertedbywayofcoercivepowerorthrougheconomiesofscale.Inthelattercase,entrytothemarketislimitedduetothehighcostsassociatedwiththemarketentry.Marketpioneersarehencelikelytodominatethemarketforalongtime.
302
orderhorninChinatown,inJoburgthere.WewereinBeitbridge370then.IusedtoworkinZim371then.Ipoachedthere.Thesecuritybecametightandtighter.Peoplewerekilled;morepeoplewerekilledingameparks.InSouthAfrica,thesituationwasquitelax.Thesecurityisnotgood,thegameparksarequitesmall–theyarelikezoos,theyarenotlikeourareasinZim.Theyarejustverysmall.Youcanevenhuntinthedarknessofthenightandgetthatthing.Sowedecidedtomovethatside.HereinZimthenumbersofrhinosarelow,notlikeinSouthAfrica.HeretheyaremanyinMokopane,Lephalale,Thabazimbi372–butinZim,theyareselectedandonlyinsomeareas.Thegameparksarenotprivatelikehere,wheretheyareownedbyindividuals…[…].373Securityisnowverytightalthoughwecangetin,eventhoughsecurityisverytight.WefounditisnotaseasyashereinSouthAfrica.No,hereitissoeasy.Gettinginandall…Youcananytimegetintothissmallareaandfindthetracks.Itiseasytotrackandthenyoufindthem.”
TheinformantmakesreferencetothedwindlingrhinonumbersinZimbabwe.Accordingto
theAfricanRhinoSpecialistRhinoGroup’s(AfSRG)lateststatistics(providedinMilliken2014:
15),lessthan700whiteandblackrhinosremainedinZimbabweasofOctober2013.374
Noteworthyisthehighmobilityofillegalhuntingcrews;inotherwords,foreignhuntingcrews
werewillingtomovetheiroperationsacrosstheborderandthebarrierstoentryintothe
SouthAfricansupplystructuresappearedmarginal.Thisspecificinformanthadhistorical
connectionstoaChineseintermediaryinJohannesburg,whichcancelledouttheneedto
identifyanewbuyerandsupplychain.Otherssoughtoutallianceswithlocalcriminalgroups
370BeitbridgeisaborderpostbetweenZimbabweandSouthAfrica.TherearetwosmalltownsbothnamedBeitbridgeonbothsidesoftheborder.Likeotherbordertownsintheregion,thereisalotof‘wheelinganddealing’happeninginthetwotowns.WhilethepoliticalborderbetweenZimbabweanandSouthAfricaisregardedasporous;traffickersandsmugglerspreferpassagethroughtheofficialborderposttominimizedangersassociatedwithillegallycrossingagainstthepaymentofabribe(seeforexamples:Hübschle2010).TheinformantreferstotheZimbabweanbordertownofBeitbridgeinthecitationabove.371‘Zim’isthecolloquialreferenceforZimbabwe.372ThethreenamesrefertosmalltownsinthenorthernprovinceofLimpopoinSouthAfrica.373RhinopoachingoccurspredominantlyinthenationalparksofZimbabwe.Asaconsequence,mostoftheremainingrhinosarefoundinlessthantenprivately-managedconservancies(Duffy/Emslie/Knight2013a:4).InstarkcontrasttoprivateownershipofrhinosinSouthAfrica,rhinosfoundonprivatelandaremanagedunderaprivatecustodianshipprogrammeforthebenefitofallZimbabweans(Saxton2007:10).374Zimbabweexperiencedapoachingspikeinthemid-80s,whichwasattributedtotheattritionofblackrhinosinZambia’sLuangwaValleyinthe1970s.LusakatheZambiancapitalwasthemajorwildlifetraffickinghubatthetime.Bythe1980s,ZambianintermediariesdirectedtheirpoachinggroupstoZimbabwetosupplementthediminishinghornsuppliesinZambiawithpoachedrhinohornfromitssouthernneighbour(Millikenetal.1993:21).TheZimbabweanDepartmentofNationalParksandWildLifeManagement(DNPWLM)gainednotorietyduringtheso-called“RhinoWars”inthe1980sthroughitssystematicanddeadlyanti-poachingeffort,whichalsoincludedthedehorningofrhinosasaconservationmethod(Millikenetal.1993:2).
303
(Interviews,2013).Insteadofcompetition(so-called‘turfwars’),thereisaformofmutual
‘criminal’assistanceamongstsouthernAfricanhuntingcrews.Forexample,theZimbabwean
crewshadaccesstohuntingrifles,whichtheyeitherwerewillingtoleaseoutortheyoffered
theirservicesasseasonedrhinohunterstothehighestbidder(comparewiththesectionon
theroleofkingpinsinthischapter).Thecompositionofhuntingcrewsisoften
heterogeneous,375meaningthatmenofdifferentagegroups,ethnicitiesandnationalities
cooperate.Deploymentintoahuntingcrewdependsonanumberoffactorssuchasthe
locationofthereserveorpark,priorknowledgeof,orintelligenceregardingthecontoursof
thepark,aswellastheskillssetsrequiredforaplannedhunt(Interviewswithpoachers,
2013).376WhereasZimbabweanpoachinggangsadaptedthecompositionoftheirgroupsand
modusoperandiinthepast,377thenewgenerationappearsmoresecurityconsciousand
convenience-orientated.Thesubtextofthecitedinterviewunderlinesthemotivationclearly:
Whywasteone’stimeandpotentiallyone’slifewhenSouthAfricaoffersrhinosona“golden
platter”?Criminalactorsactiveinviolentcrimessuchascash-in-transitheistsorarmed
robberiesalsojumpedshipbecause“rhinopoachingismucheasier”(Interviewwithprivate
securityactor3,2013).
Thirdly,buyers,intermediariesandlawenforcementofficials(Interviews,2013)citethe
increasingpriceof‘legal’or‘gray’rhinotrophyhuntsasasignificantcostconsideration
leadingtotheescalationofillegalhunting.Itwascheaperandlesscomplicatedtoundertake
businesswithlocalhunterswhowerepaidcomparativelylittle.Whenpseudo-hunting
commencedintheearly2000s,atrophyhuntwouldcostintheregionofR150000toR200
000(19370€to25770€–comparewithGraph4).OneMozambicankingpin(Interview,
2013)waspaid1900€/kgwhenhestartedillegallyhuntingintheKNPin2009.Theratesfor
375Heterogeneityofhuntingcrewsdoesnotextendtoquestionsofgender.Whilewomeninvolvedwereinvolvedinlaterstagesofsupplychains,noevidencecouldbefoundofwomenparticipatinginhuntingcrews.376ZimbabweansandMozambicanpoachinggroupsarenotpioneersintraversinginternationalbordersinpursuitofhigh-valuewildlifecontraband.SouthAfricanprofessionalbiggamehuntersoperatedinZimbabweinthepast(duToit2013,Interviewwithconservator,2013);asrecentas2April2015,twosuspectedpoacherswereshotdeadintheprivateconservancyofMalilangweinsoutheasternZimbabwe.OneofthesuspectswasaSouthAfricancitizen(EyewitnessNews2015).377PoachingexpeditionsintoZimbabweannationalparkscouldtakeuptotwoweeksduringthelate1980sandearly1990s.Thegroupsincorporatedagreaternumberofmemberstoassistwithcarryingprovisionsinandrhinohornandivoryout(Millikenetal.1993:26).
304
SouthAfricanillegalhuntingteamswerelowerthanthatoftheirMozambicancounterparts.
SomehunterswerepaidaslittleasR80000toR250000(8300€to26000€)perhuntatthe
time(Interviewswithconvictedpoachers,intermediariesandtransporters,2013).Bythe
timetheXayasavangnetworkgotinvolvedthecostofattainingasetof‘gray’rhinohornshad
morethandoubled.ChumlongLemthongthaiwaspaying6135€/kgforpseudo-huntedrhino
horn.Atanaverageweightof5,88kgpersetofwhiterhinohorn,378apseudorhinohuntcost
closeto€36000ormore.Additionalcostsassociatedwithtransportation,permitsandtaxes
andcooperationpremiums(bribespaidtosocialcontrolagents)increasedthetotalcostof
pseudo-huntedrhinohorn.
Pseudo-huntinghadlostitsappealbythetimeofLemthongthai’sarrestin2011.While
huntingregulationshadbeenadjustedtodealwiththephenomenon(albeitnottoo
successfullyasEastEuropeanhunterstookoverfromtheirAsiancolleagues),thereasonsfor
supplydiversificationseemtohavebeendrivenbyefficiencyandsecurityconsiderations
(comparewith:Morselli/Giguère/Petit2007),aswellasopportunitystructureslinkedtothe
geographiclocationoftheKNPanditscloseproximitytomajortraffichubs(discussedbelow).
Becausethecostof‘legal’orgrayrhinohuntshadescalated,poachinghadbecomean
attractivealternativethatcoulddeliverhighervolumesofhornatlowerpricesandthrough
lesscomplexsupplychains.Asattractiveasthesemblanceoflegalitymayhavebeento
organizers,transportersandconsumers,theoperationalfocusshiftedtoorganizedpoaching
expeditionsintotheKrugerNationalPark,provincialparksandprivategamereserves.While
there-focusingfrompseudo-huntingtoorganizedpoachingdidnotconstitutemarketfailure
ordisruptionperse,itdoessignaltheadaptabilityofwildlifetraffickersandtheprimacyof
costsaving,efficiencyandsecurityconsiderations–“thedollarsignrules”(Interviewwith
transporter,2013).
378Theaverageweightofthefronthornofarhinoisbetween5to9kg,andthebackhornweighsupto1,5kg(deWet2013:4).BasedonastudyconductedintheKNPandcrosscomparisonswithdatafromelsewhereinAfrica,formerNationalParksBoardscientists(Pienaar/Hall-Martin/Hitchens1991:6)peggedtheaverageweightofhornsofwhiterhinoslivinginthewildat5,88kg(forboththeanteriorandposteriorhorn)whereastheaverageweightofblackrhinohornswere2,65kgforanimalslivingintheKNPandKZNnationalparks(slightlylessthantheEastAfricanspecies).TheaverageweightproposedbyPienaarandhiscolleagueshasbecometheacceptednorm,frequentlycitedinrhinoresearch(seeforexample:Milliken2014).
305
Fourthly,themigrationtoorganizedpoachingandthecontinuedlaunderingofstockpiledor
illegallydehornedrhinohornwasfurtherassistedthroughthebythenfirmlyestablishedand
secureillegalandlegalsupplychainsoutofSouthAfricaandneighbouringcountries
(Interviewswithintermediariesandlawenforcementofficials,2013).Intermediarynetworks,
traffickingchannelsandallianceswithstateactorshadbeenfirmlyestablishedbythelate
2000s.WhilesomesouthernAfricantraffickersmayhavehadhistoricaltradeandsmuggling
connectionsthroughapartheidmilitaryintelligencestructurestoAsia(Interviews,2013,
2014),newbusinessopportunitiesandroutesemergedinthemid-tothelate2000s.
Historically,Asiancriminalgroupshavebeeninvolvedinanumberofcooperativealliances
withlocalactorsinbothlegalandillegalmarkets.Forexample,thehistoricalbarteringtrade
ofmethaqualoneandlater,precursorchemicalsusedintheproductionofcrystal
methamphetamines(locallyknownas‘tik’),inexchangeforhigh-valuemaritimeresources
suchasabalone379hadledtocriminalalliancesbetweenlocalgangsfromtheCapeFlats380
andChinesecriminalgroups(comparewith:Steinberg2005a).Initiallyinterestedinabalone,
lionbonesandivory,Asiancriminalsbranchedoutintothemorelucrativerhinohornmarket
whileAfrikanerkingpinsstartedactivelymarketingSouthAfricanrhinohorntoAsianbuyersin
Asiancountries(seethepreviouschapter).Wildlifetraffickers‘piggy-backed’ontoexisting
traffickingandintermediarynetworksandroutes,expandingandentrenchingthemfurther.In
someinstances,symbioticrelationshipsemergedwhichfacilitatedcheap,reliableandspeedy
transportationofwildlifecontrabandtogetherwithotherlicitorillicitcommoditiesfrom
sourcetodestination.Smugglerswereinapositiontomovegreatervolumesofhornasmany
morerhinoscouldbeshotdeadanddehornedthan‘pseudo’or‘proxy’hunted.Therearealso
anumberofopportunitystructuresthatrenderillegalhuntingonpublicorprivateproperties
anattractivebusinessproposition.TheKNPislocateda5-hoursdrivefromORTambo
InternationalAirportinJohannesburg,andMaputocanbereachedbycarinabout6hours.
Moreover,Swazilandisincloseproximity,asisDurbanharbour,SouthAfrica’sprincipalport,
whichprovidesaccesstointernationalmaritimeroutes.LocatedinthehinterlandsofSouth
AfricaaresmugglingcorridorsbetweenSwazilandandMozambique.Thesecorridorswere
379AbaloneisamaritimesnailfoundpredominantlyinthecoldwatersalongtheWestandOverbergcoastlinesborderingtheAtlanticOcean.AbaloneishighlycovetedinAsianmarketsforitsaphrodisiacqualities.380TheCapeFlatsreferstoanareaofCapeTown,towhichpeopleofmixedracewereforciblymovedduringtheapartheidregime.
306
usedtomoveanti-apartheidactivistsandfighters,weaponsandammunitiontoSouthAfrican
liberationmovementsduringtheanti-apartheidstruggle.Aftertheendofapartheid,the
corridorsmorphedintotraffickingarteries,alongwhichcannabis,guns,cigarettes,stolen
motorvehicles,othercontrabandandlegalcommodities(toavoidtaxation)weresmuggled
fromandtoSouthAfrica,anditsneighbours.Theyalsousedtomovewildlifecontraband
includingrhinohornfromthesource(predominantlyfromtheKNP)totranshipmenthubsin
EastAfrica.
Finally,thecreationoftheLNPhasledtotheeconomicmarginalizationofvillagecommunities
livinginsidetheareaoftheparkoronitsedge.Theseven-yearperiodfromtheproclamation
oftheParkin2001totheescalationofrhinopoachingintheKNPin2008sawvillage
communities’livesandfortuneschangefrombadtoworse.Theresettlementofcommunities
(seeChapter4),aswellasthosethatchosetostaybehind,hasledtodiminishedincome
streams,andchangedsocialrelationswithinthevillageunit.Theseimpoverished
communitiesprovideareadypoolofvillagerswillingtorisktheirlivesinpursuitofthe
‘golden’horn.
Inconcludingthissection,itisimportanttonotethatanumberofparallelprocessesledto
themigrationfromlegalandgrayflowsofrhinohorntothetimeexpedient,costefficient,less
complexandsecureflowofillegallyhuntedrhinohornfromnationalparksandgame
reserves.Thefollowingsectionsanalysesthecrucialroleofkingpinsandintermediariesinthe
supplychain.
7.3Kingpins,intermediariesandsmugglers:Thelocalstronghold
Localkingpins,381intermediariesandtransportersaretheanchoranddrivingforcebehindthis
illegalflow.Theroleoftheseactorsiscentraltothecontinuityofhornsupply;however,actor
381InvestigatorsfortheSouthAfricanorganizedcrimeunitwithintheSAPS,theHawks,employtheterm“kingpin”torefertolocalcrimebosses.Forthesakeofconsistency,thecontroversialtermisemployedinthisdissertation.Itisacknowledgedthat‘queenpins’doexistandtheterm“kingpin”couldbeconstruedassexistandgenderinsensitive.However,thoseinterviewed(bosses,poachersandinvestigators)usedthetermfrequentlyandfeltcomfortablewiththelabeling,associatednarrativesandmeanings.
307
constellationsarecomplexandmulti-layered,andeconomicrelationshipsarefrequently
dropped,reinventedordiscontinued.Whileorganizingandcoordinatingillegalhuntinggroups
takesupagreatpartoftheeverydayresponsibilitiesofarhinokingpin,theirfunctionsalso
includequalitycontrol,conflictresolution,liaisonandcooperationwithlocalauthoritiesand
villageelders,horntransporters,competitorsandsocialcontrolagents,aswellassecuring
continuityofthesupplychain.ThesectiondrawsondatacollectedintheMozambican
borderlandsandSouthAfricanprisons.
7.3.1Thesocialeconomyintheborderlands:Whatdoesittaketobecomearhinokingpin?
Whiletherehavebeenafewcasesofsocialupwardmobilityandrankadvancementfrom
poachertokingpin,themajorityofkingpinshavepriorexperienceincross-bordercrime,382
lawenforcementcareersorconservationbackgrounds,383ortheywererunningsuccessful
legitimatebusinessessuchastaxiortransportationcompaniesintheirpreviouslives.Once
rhinopoachingemergedasalucrativeeconomicopportunity,theseactorsdiversifiedinto
rhinopoaching.Accordingtointelligencereports(Interviewwithintelligenceofficers,
MozambiqueandKNP,2013),a“groupoffourteen”384ranthefirstpoachingcrews“intheold
days”of2008.Knowledgeoftraversingroutesthroughthepark,locationofwaterholesand
382AnotoriousrhinokingpinwhogoesbythepseudonymofMrNavarawastheorganizerofacross-bordercartheftsyndicate.ThesyndicatewasimportingstolencarsfromSouthAfricatoMozambique.MrNavara’spassionforstealingluxurySUVNissanvehiclesofthe‘Navara’brandhasearnedhimhisnickname.ThekingpiniswantedfortheabductionandmurderofawildlifeveterinarianinSouthAfrica’sLimpopoProvince.IntheabsenceofanextraditiontreatybetweenMozambiqueandSouthAfrica,SimonErnestValoi(hisrealname)remainsuntouchable(Interviews,2103).JusticeNgovene,anotherkingpinrunsaDVDcounterfeitingbusinessand‘jailbreaks’(cracks)securitycodesofstolenmobilephonesandcomputerequipment.HewasbuildingMassingir’sfirsthotelduringthelastfieldvisittoMassingirinAugust2013.Justiceisalsoknownbythename“Nyimpini”whichistheShangaanwordforcentre,coreorfoundation,orthehandleofanaxe–illegalhuntersuseeitherax,pocketknivesormachetestoremoverhinohorns.383SeveralrangersandfieldguidesfromtheKNP,LNPandHlhuluwe-Imfolozi(someofwhomarenolongerintheemployoftheseparks)arerunningtheirhuntinggroups(Interviewswithkingpin1andintelligenceoperatives,2013).384Theoriginofthenumberisunclear,perhapsevenmythical.EmpiricalevidenceconfirmsthattherewereanumberofpoachingpioneerslivinginproximityoftheKNPontheSouthAfricanandMozambicanside.
308
biganimals,aswellasbushnavigation,military385andtrackingskillsrenderedthemideal
recruits.WhiteSouthAfricansinvolvedingrayandillegalflowsofhornrecruitedtheGroupof
14,whobecamethemainhornsuppliersandpoachingintermediariesinsubsequentyears.A
Massingir-basedkingpinrevealed(Interview,2013):
“ThiswholethingstartedwiththepeoplefromSouthAfrica.TheycametoMozambiqueandintroducedthisbusinesstousandtheypaidusalotofmoney.Theybasicallyrevealedthesecret.ThentheChinesesawtheopportunitythentheystartedcomingtousforbusiness…[…]…TheSouthAfricanwhitemanopenedoureyes,thenmostofussawthepotentialofthebusinessandthenwestartedtodoitonourownandweintroducedmorehunters.”386
TheSouthAfricanrecruitersprovidedhuntingrifles,ammunitionandcashforthehorns.Early
transactionsalsoinvolvedthebarterofhuntingriflesforrhinohorn(Interviewwithkingpin,
2013).Theearlypoacher-kingpinsfulfilledorganizational,operationalandlogisticalfunctions.
OnceillegalhuntingcrewshadpoachedanddehornedrhinosintheKNP,rhinohornswere
takentoMozambique.FromtherethehornwouldbetakenonfootthroughtheGiyaniborder
posttoJohannesburg(backtoSouthAfrica)ortranshipmenthubsinBeiraandMaputo.The
SouthAfricanrecruitershadbusinessandfarminginterestsinMozambique,whichprovided
themwithlegitimatereasonstoseekout‘partnerships’withlocals.Twoindividualshavebeen
linkedtoivoryandrhinohornsmugglingduringtheborderwarsofthe1970sand1980s.The
existingexportandimportbusinesseswereusedasafronttoconductillegaldealsandexport
wildlifecontrabandtoconsumermarkets.ThegroupofwhiteSouthAfricansisstilloperating
outofMozambique;thelocalkingpinsarehoweverdealingwithbuyersandtransporters
directly.Atleasttwooftheoriginalkingpins(whowerestillactiveinMarch2016)andone
intermediarywereinvolvedincross-bordersmugglingoperationsinvolvingstolenmotor
vehicles.387TheMozambicankingpinsandpoachersinterviewedfortheresearchhad
385Thedecades-longcivilwarinMozambiqueequippedmostMozambicansovertheageof40withbasicmilitaryskills,whichwereneededfordailysurvival.386Otherkingpins,poachersandintelligenceoperatorsconfirmedtheunlikelyalliancebetweenwhiterhinocriminalsandblackcriminalentrepreneurs(thebackgroundtopoachingkingpinsisdiscussedbelow).387Knownasthe“WildWestofcardealingandwheeling”inlawenforcementcircles,thesmalltownofChokweislocatedabout120kmsouthfromMassingirand225kmnorthofMaputo.ItisbelievedthatthemajorityofSouthAfricanstolenmotorvehiclestransitthroughChokwe(Interviewswithregionallawenforcementofficials,2013).Chokwewasalocalmarketwhererhinohorntransactionswouldtakeplaceupuntil2012/2013.
309
traversedtheKrugerNationalParkonnumerousoccasionstosearchforemploymentinSouth
Africaandtovisittheirfamiliesinthevillages.388
7.3.2Need,greedandenvironmentaljusticeprinciples
Whatmotivateskingpinsandtheirhuntingcrewstokillanddehornrhinos?Lawenforcement
andconservationofficialsportraycommunitieslivinginsideorontheedgeoftheLNPasa
homogeneousgroupofpeoplethatconsistsofpoachers,andvillagerswhobenefitfromrhino
poaching(Interviews,2013).389Itissuggestedthatruralpoverty,opportunitystructuresof
livingclosetothepark,andgreedarefeedingthepoachingcrisis.Thesefactorsconstitute
sufficientdriversofpoaching;however,therootcausesofpoachingtouchonthehistoryof
conservation,huntingrightsandlandownershipinsouthernAfrica(comparewithearlier
chapters,especiallyChapter4).Theeffectsofstructuralviolencearevisibleinthevillage
communitieswhonotonlyliveontheedgeofparksbutalsoontheedgeofsocietywhenit
comestosocialandeconomicupliftmentinitiatives.Thecontinuedeconomic,politicaland
socialmarginalizationofvillagecommunities(unpackedinChapter4)hasgivenriseto
environmentalandsocialjusticeconcerns.Whiletherhinohasabountyonitshornthatfar
outweighstheaverageannualincomeofaruralvillager,poachingisnotjustabouttheprice
ofthehornbutalsoaboutclaimingreparationsforthelossofland,huntingandlanduse
rightsanddemandsforeconomicopportunitiesandagencytoco-determinethefutureand
goodfortunesofvillagecommunities(Interviews,2013).Itisagainstthisbackdropthat
kingpinsandhuntershaveemergedasself-styledRobinHoods,whouserhinopoachingfor
socialandeconomicupwardmobility.SaysonekingpinbasedinaMozambicanvillage
community(Interviewwithkingpin3,2013):
388Asmentionedinearlierchapters,colonialbordersweredrawnwithlittleregardforindigenousAfricanpeopleandtheirspheresofinfluence.TheShangaanpeople,forexample,liveinMozambiqueandSouthAfrica.ThepoliticalandeconomicsituationinMozambiqueledtomenseekingemploymentinSouthAfricanminesandonfarms.PathwaysthroughtheKNPwereoftenthemostconvenientandeasyroutetoSouthAfricaandviceversa(Interviews,2013).389Thebombingofallvillageswithin30kmradiusoftheKNPontheMozambicansidehasbeenmootedasananti-rhinopoachingstrategyinanonlinediscussiongroup.Whilethisisanextremeproposalofaradicalminority,itshowshowstigmatizationofvillagersasahomogenousgroupofpoachersisincreasinglyenteringmainstreamthinking.
310
“Weareusingrhinohorntofreeourselves.”
Mozambicanvillagers,rangers,poachersandkingpins,aswellasconvictedrhinocriminals
servingprisonsentencesinSouthAfricancorrectionalcentresexpressedtheirannoyancewith
thestateforvaluinganimalsoverhumanlives(Interviewsandfocusgroups2012,2013).A
hornsmuggler(Interviewwithintermediary1,2013)explainedtherhinoissueasfollows:
“This[rhinoproblem]isbecauseofconservation.Theysaythatweneedthosethings[rhinos].Theyarenice.Someofthewhitepeopleheretreatthemliketheirfriends.Theyvaluetherhinomorethanblackhumanbeings.Andnowtheyseeitasabusiness,ifyouhavetworhinosyouarerich.”
Therhinohasbecomethelucrativescapegoatfortheongoingrelativedeprivationand
economicmarginalizationofvillagecommunities.Unliketheslowtrickledownlinkedto
communitybeneficiationinitiativesofthestateandprivateoperatorsinandaround
conservationareas,communitymembersobservetheupwardsocialmobilityofkingpins,
poachersandtheirfamilies.Theinfluxofhardcashintovillagecommunitieshascreatedthe
perceptionthatallvillagersbenefitequallyfromrhinopoaching,theso-called‘RobinHood
effect’(InterviewswithKNPofficials,2013).ThesocialbanditryassociatedwithRobinHood
capturesanimportantaspectofkingpins’andpoachers’assertedidentitiesinthecontextof
villagecommunities.Therole,functionsandidentitiesofkingpinsandpoachersarehowever
farmorecomplex,multi-layeredandcontingentonthegeographiccontext.Whilemany
poachersoriginatefromvillagecommunities,othersjoinhuntingcrewsfromcommunities
elsewhere,evenforeigncountries(usuallyconnectedtovillagecommunitiesviakinshipties).
Thelevelofsocialembeddednessofkingpinsandpoachersvariesandcarriesstructuraland
logisticalimplicationsfortheflowofrhinohorn.Ofimportancearecommunityperceptionsof
whethertheirfortunesandlivelihoodsareimproving.Thecommunityappearstobenefit
largelyindirectly,asthereareveryfewdirecthand-outs.Directhand-outsarerelegatedto
certainkingpins“throwingavillageparty”byslaughteringafewcowsandproviding
traditionalbeeruponthereturnofasuccessfulpoachingexpeditiontotheKrugerNational
Park.Othersconstructservitudes,waterwells,spazashops390andshebeens,391and
390Aspazashopisasmallneighbourhoodgrocer.
311
occasionallyafewcowsaredonatedforslaughteringtothebenefitofthecommunity
(Interviewsandfocusgroup,2013).Comparedtothemeagrelivelihoodsofvillage
communities,kingpinsandpoachershavepurchasepower,allowingthemtobuygreater
volumesofgoodsandservices,whichindirectlybenefitcommunitymembers.Oneyoung
poacher(mid-20s)relatedhowhewasbearingtheriskwhengoingonhuntingexpeditionsin
theKrugerParkandthuswasnotpreparedtosharehisprofitswiththecommunity(Interview
withpoacher15,Massingir,2013):“Itbenefitsme,Idon’tgivetothecommunity.”Notall
poachersarepaidequallywell.AcrimeinvestigatorintheKNP(Interview,2013)recounted
thestoryofinterrogatinga17-yearoldpoacher,whoseteammatewaskilledduringa
shootoutwiththeKNPanti-poachingunit:
“Whatthehellareyoudoinghere?Didtheypromiseyoumoney?Yes.Butthemoneyisnottheissue.Theypromisedtogiveme12,5kilosmealiemeal.392Theyarefour–threekids[andhim],hisfatherpassedawayatthemines.He’saveewagter.393He'slookingaftercattleforsomebodyelse.Heistheonlyonethatearnsmoneyinthathouse.Forabagofmealiemeal…”
Foreignorout-of-townpoachingcrewsrelyonlocalaccommodation,foodandlogistical
assistancefrommembersofthecommunity.Itis,however,incorrecttoassumethatthe
entirecommunityiscomplicitorbenefitsinequalmeasures.
Poachingprofitsarepredominantlylaunderedintotheproperty,luxurygoodsandautomobile
sectors.TheMozambicantownofMassingirexudesanaurasimilartoshort-livedboomtowns
duringanapparent‘GoldRush’.Ithasbecomeamagnetforbusinessentrepreneursfrom
otherprovincesoracrosstheborder,keentoseizenewopportunities.Youngmenfrom
elsewhereinMozambiqueandSouthAfricaarriveinMassingirseekingrecruitmentinto
poachingcrews.Onekingpinisbuildingahotelcomplex;othershaveinvestedinholiday
housesatthecoast–thecoastaltownofBelene,forexample,islocateda5hoursdrivefrom
391Ashebeenisapub.392‘Mealiemeal’referstomaizemeal,acoarseflourmadefrommaize.ItisastaplefoodacrossmostofthesouthernAfricanregion,ofteneatenasporridge(pap).393‘Veewagter’istheAfrikaanswordforcattleherder.
312
Massingir.394Manypoachersarebuildingmoderntownhousesinthevillages,replacingthe
traditionalclayandreedhutscommonintheregion.Thepropertyboomhasalsoledtoan
influxofskilledartisans,labourersandbusinesspeopleworkingintheconstruction,building
materialsandretailsectors.Theyoungergenerationinveststheirrhinoprofitsintooff-street
vehiclesandluxurycars(Interviewswithpoachersandkingpins,2013;fieldobservation)while
theoldergenerationisbuyingheadsofcattlewhichsignalaffluenceandstatusinvillage
communities.Whilerhinopoachinghasbecomethemainsourceofincome,somerhino
kingpinsareastutebusinessentrepreneurs,runninganumberoflegalandillegalside
businesses.Thereisawarenessabouttheceilingtotherhinohornfortunes;inotherwords,
kingpinsacknowledgetheexistentialthreattorhinosthroughpoachingandthattheywill
havetoseeknewsourcesofincome,orreturntotheoldonesoncetherhinosaregone
(Interviews,2013).Fastmovingconsumergoods(designerclothing,shoesandsunglasses),
off-streetvehiclesandfacebrickhouseshavebecomesoughtafterconsumerproductsand
statussymbolsamongstkingpinsandpoachers.Insteadofacceptinghardcashforrhinohorn,
somepoacherschoosetopayoffmotorvehicles395,constructionmaterialsforbuildingface
brickhouses,realestateorconsumergoodsinstead.Rhinokingpinsthroughtheirbusiness
connectionsareabletoprocureorassistwiththeprocurementofsuchconsumergoodsand
constructionmaterials(whicharemostlyimportedfromSouthAfrica).Theyalsocontrolthe
debteconomiesemanatingfromthisbartertrade,whichprovidesthemwithanotherlayerof
controlandaninformaleconomicleadershiprole.Inessence,indebtedpoachershaveto
supplyrhinohorntoaspecificcreditorkingpin.However,thisdependenttypeofrelationship
isnotwidespreadasmostkingpinsareconsideredabenignpresencethatupliftsthefortunes
ofvillagecommunities.
Inlinewithenvironmentalandsocialjusticearguments,kingpins,poachersandsmugglers
portrayedtheircriminalcareersaslegitimatelivelihoodsthroughouttheprocessofdata
collectionintheborderlandsandSouthAfricanprisons.TwocharismaticMozambican
394Rhinohornprofitshavebeeninvestedintoseveralluxuriousseasidevillasinthesmallcoastaltown.395Crimeintelligenceofficersverifytheregistrationnumbersofvehiclesdrivenbypoachingsuspectsatintervals.Themajorityofvehicleswerereportedasstolenornopublicrecordisavailable(Interviews,2013).
313
kingpins,forexample,haveconstructedtheiridentityas“economicfreedomfighters”396that
fightfortheeconomicandenvironmentalrightsoftheirvillagecommunities.Othershave
labelledthemselvesas‘businessmen’,‘developers’,‘communityworkers’or‘retiredhunters’
(Interviewswithkingpin1and2,2013).Aconvictedpoacher(Interviewwithpoacher16,
2013)stated:
“Youseeinaruralarea,theyusedtocalleachandeveryonethatstayedthereandtheytalkedwithustodecideaboutthingsthatconcernedus.Nowthingsaredifferent.Andtheyputthepresidentonthechair,theydon'taskusanymore,theydothingsontheirown.Itisthemthatbehaveliketheyarecrooks.That’swhyweendupkillingtherhinos.”
Kingpinslayclaimstofulfillingimportantsocialwelfare,communitydevelopmentandpolitical
leadershipfunctions.Rhinohornisinstrumentaltoachievingtheseovertlyaltruisticgoalsin
anenvironmentwherethestatehasfailedtoprovidesuchfunctions(seenextsection).The
actualrepresentativesofthestateandtraditionalleadersfulfilceremonialduties,often
heavilysubsidizedbyresidentkingpins(Interviews,2013).Similarlegitimationstrategiesare
employedinothernaturalresource-dependenteconomieselsewhereinthesouthernAfrican
region.AbalonepoachinggangleadersintheWesternCapeProvinceofSouthAfricahavealso
madeclaimsaboutthesociallegitimacyofabalonepoachinginlightofcommercialfishing
quotas,whichareperceivedtobeunjustandunfairtostrugglinggrassrootsfishing
communitiesalongtheSouthAfricancoastline(Hauck1997;Hauck/Sweijd1999,Interviews
withconservationofficials,WesternCape,2014and2015).Inthecaseofrhinopoaching,
legitimationstrategiesalsoincludetheappropriationofjoblabelsfromthe‘legal’hunting
sector.Rhinopoachersregardthemselvesas‘professionalhunters’or‘hunters’(Interviews
withconvictedpoachersandactivepoachers,2013).Thepositionofahuntercomeswith
statusandprestigeinvillagecommunitieswhereayoungboy’sfirsthuntisariteofpassage
and“youactuallybecomeamanwhenyouhunt”(Focusgroup,2013).Thepoacherisclaiming
backhisrighttohuntbypoachinginmoderndayconservationareas,whichwerethe
traditionalhuntinggroundsofhisforefathers.Colonialanti-poachinglawsandtheirmodern
396TheEconomicFreedomFighters(EFF)isasplinterpartyoftherulingAfricanNationalCongress(ANC)inSouthAfrica.DispelledformerANCYouthLeague,commander-in-chiefJuliusMalemaformedthesocialistparty.ItspolicyplatformoflandreformandwealthredistributionisreceivingwidespreadsupportinSouthAfricaandbeyond.
314
incarnationintheformofhuntingregulationsrequirepaymentforhuntingpermits.Total
protectionzoneswhichbanhuntingandotherlanduseshaveledtotheeconomicand
geographicexclusionofruralcommunitiesfrom‘legal’huntinginareasclosetotheirlocation.
Rhinopoachingthuswasinitiallyalsoaformofprotestagainstthehuntingban–another
expressionofcontestedillegality–allowingactorstoprotestagainstunfairandeconomic
exclusionaryrulemaking.Whatstartedasanillegaleconomicactivityborneoutofneedand
protestagainstunfairruleshashoweversnowballedintogreed-basedaccumulationfurther
exacerbatedbythehighvalueofrhinohorn.
7.4Feedbackloopsofrhinopoachingandanti-poachingmeasures
Theprevioussectiondealtthesocialembeddednessofrhinopoacherswithinvillage
communitiesandthelegitimationstrategiesemployedtojustifyillegaleconomicactivities.
Thissectionlooksintothenegativeimpactsandtheirsocietalrelevance,aswellasfeedback
loopstiedtothemilitarizationandsecuritizationofresponsesagainstpoachingandthesocial
embeddednessofpoachersandrangers.Severalfocusgroupsandindividualinterviews
exposeddeepriftswithinvillagecommunities;especiallymothersandwivesweredeeply
concernedaboutthepoachingphenomenonfearingfortheirchildren’sorhusband’slives397
andthepotentiallossofabreadwinnershouldtheygetkilledorarrested.Farfrombeing
supportiveofpoaching,theysharedhowpoachinghadaffectedthesocialfabricofvillagelife,
397Whilewomenareinvolvedfurtheralongtheillegalsupplychainofrhinohorn,IhadnotcomeacrossfemalepoachersinthesouthernAfricancontextatthetimeoffieldwork.However,twoyoungmotherswereconvictedofconspiracytohuntrhinosandpossessionofanunlicensedfirearmandammunitionintheLadysmithRegionalCourtinMarch2016(Skinner2016).ItalsobearspointingoutthatwomenwerecombatantsduringtheMozambicancivilwar.Aninterviewwitharesearcherworkinginthefieldofdisarmament,demobilizationandreintegration(DDR)inMozambique(Interviewwithresearcher1,2012,2013)revealedthatmanyMozambicanwomenovertheageof30knowhowtohandlegunsanddefendthemselvesbyusingsuchguns(whichhadbecomeanecessityduringthecivilwar).Theabilitytousefirearmstodefendone’slifedoesnotnecessarilycorrelatewithawillingnesstogopoachingintheKrugerNationalPark.However,therecentcaseintheLadysmithRegionalCourtraisesinterestingquestionsastothepoachingmotivationsofthetwoyoungmothersandwarrantsfurtherinquiryintopathwaystopoaching.
315
mostlytothedetrimentofwomenandchildren.398AconvictedMozambicanpoachershared
(Interviewwithconvictedpoacher2,2013):
“Theparentsgetveryangrybutthere’snothingtheycandoaboutit.There’snoemploymentinthearea.Ourparentsworrythatrangerswillkillus.Theydowarnusbutwedon’tlisten.SometimesonFridaysandSaturdays,theyhavecommunitymeetingstotalktousaboutthedangersofpoaching.”
Afewhalf-builthousesinthevillagesareareminderofthestarkrealitythatsomepoachers
donotreturnfrom‘Skukuza’.399AccordingtoMozambicansources(Mabunda2012),400close
to400poachingsuspectsfromMozambiquehadlosttheirlivesbetween2008andearly2014.
SouthAfricanofficialsareapprehensivetosharethestatistics(seeTable12)forfearofbad
pressandretribution(Interviews,2013).Atthetimeofwriting,poachershadnotkilled
rangers;however,therehavebeenseveralreporteddeathsofanti-poachingoperatives
(comparewithfootnote9;personalcommunicationwithKNPofficials,2015).Focusgroups
withcommunityrepresentativesintheborderlandsrevealedthatthedeathsofpoaching
suspectshadledtofurtheralienationandoutrightantagonismofcommunitymembers
towardsthePark.CommunitymembersrecountedthatmanyvillagerstraversedtheKNPin
searchofworkortovisitfamiliesinSouthAfrica.Asshownearlier,colonial-erapolitical
bordersremainacrossmostofsouthernAfrica,whichsuitedcolonialinterestsatthetimebut
oftenseparatedlocalcommunities.AccordingtointerviewswithKrugerofficialsandolder
398WhilewalkingthroughoneofthevillagesIcameuponanoldwoman,whowaslookingafteragroupofeightchildrenoutsideahut.Fourofthekidsweretheoldwoman’sgrandchildren,whohadbeenleftinhercare.Herdaughterhadleftthefatherofherchildrenforarichpoacherinthevillage.Thegrandmotherwasdisgruntledaboutthestateofaffairs,asshereceivednofinancialsupportfromthedaughterorthedesertedhusband.Oneofthechildrenhadtobehospitalizedasaconsequenceofsevereburnsfromashackfirethenightbefore.Thefamilycouldnotgetholdofthemotherbecause“whentheboyscomebackfromSkukuza,thenthereismoneyandcelebration”(Interviewwitholdwoman,Massingir,2013).Accordingtothegrandmother,themotherlookedafterthechildrenwheneverherboyfriendwentoffonanotherpoachingexpedition.Thedaughterbroughtnomoneyhome,asthehornprofitsarespenton“womenandbooze”.399SkukuzaisthemainrestcampandadministrativeheadquartersoftheKNP.Whenapoacherannouncesthatheis‘goingtoSkukuza’,itindicatesthatheispreparingforapoachingexpeditionintotheKNP.400InvestigativejournalistLazaroMabundaundertookfascinatingresearchintopoachingcrewsintheMozambicanborderlandin2012.AccordingtooneofhisconfidentialpolicesourcesintheMozambicanpolice(pers.communicationin2015),363MozambicanpoachingsuspectshadbeenshotdeadintheKrugerbetween2008andearly2014.FormerMozambicanPresidentJoaquimChissanoannouncedatapressconferenceinSeptember2015thatSouthAfricanrangersandsecurityforceshadkilled476MozambicansintheKrugerNationalParkbetweenJanuary2010andJune2015(AIM2015).ItisunclearwhytheMozambicanandSouthAfricanstatisticsdonottally,whichmightbelinkedtoSANParks’useofterm‘neutralized’(comparewithnextfootnote).Deadbodiesorthedisappearanceofacommunitymemberarecertainlydifficulttoconceal.
316
villagecommunitymembers(Interviewsandfocusgroups,2013),somevillagerscarrydual
citizenship.
Table12:ArrestsanddeathsofpoachersintheKrugerNationalPark,2010-2014401
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Neutralized 174 133 73 82 67
Killedinaction 45402 47 17 21 4
Source:SuppliedbyKrugerNationalParkon25August2014
PeoplelivingonbothsidesoftheborderarehighlymobileandmovebetweenSouthAfrica
andMozambiquefornumerousreasons.Intheeyesofthecommunity,Krugergamerangers
killtheirfellowvillagersonthesuspicionthatalltrespassersarepoachers.Theincreasing
militarizationofresponsestorhinopoachingispittingthemagainstparkauthorities,rangers
andrhinos.Moreover,theseresponseshavefurtherexacerbatedthesentimentthatwild
animalsarevaluedhigherthanblackpeopleinconservationandgovernmentcircles.Onthe
otherendofthespectrumaretheKrugerrangerswhorisktheirliveseachdaytoprotectthe
rhino(seeGraph6).WhiletherehasbeenpoachingofwildlifeeversincethePark’sinception,
thedutiesofarangerusedtoentailconservation-orientatedendeavoursandtodealwith
delinquenttourists.Nowadays,rangersreceivequasi-guerrilla-style,anti-poachingtraining,
andspendmostoftheirtimedefendingrhinosandtrackingthespoorofsuspectedpoachers
(InterviewwithKNPofficial,2013).
Anothercleavagearisesfromthesocialembeddednessofpoachersandrangerswith
consequencesforharmoniousrelationsandsociallifeatthevillagelevel,andthe
effectivenessoflawenforcementdisruptions.ManyLNPemployees(includingtheranger
corps)andtheworkforceonprivately-ownedconcessionsarerecruitedfromlocalvillage
communitieslivinginsideorontheedgeoftheParkandprivateconcessions.Theoriginal
401Explanatorynote:TheKNPenvironmentalmanagementinspectorateemploystheunfortunateterm“neutralized”toreflectthetotalofsuspectedpoacherskilledandarrestedinsidetheKNP.402By25August2014,23suspectedpoachershadbeenkilled.Thefigureof45deathsderivesfromamediabriefing.AttemptstoconfirmthestatisticswithKNPofficialswerenotanswered.
317
rangercorpsintheLNPconsistedof45guardsand55fieldrangers,whowereresponsiblefor
wildlifeconservationandlawenforcement.Thenumbersoftherangercorpshavebeen
augmentedbytheadditionofanelitespecialanti-poachingunitof30men,whowere
deployedinmid-December2013.Membersoftheunitreceivedspecializedtraining,three
LandCruiservehicles,rifles,radiosandpatrolequipment(PeaceParksFoundation6January
2014).
Graph6:Anti-poachinginterventionsintheKrugerNationalPark
Source:SamFerreira(2015:slide3)
Mostoftheprivately-ownedhuntingandtouristconcessions403southoftheParkhave
employedtheirownrangercorps,sometimesevenspecializedanti-poachingandintelligence
403SouthoftheLimpopoNationalParkandalongtheeasternboundaryoftheKrugerNationalParkareseveralhuntingandtouristconcessions.TheseconcessionsarepredominantlyownedbySouthAfricancorporates(includingforexampleSingita’sTwinCity,andHulettTongaat),huntingconcessionssuchasSabieParkorecotourisminitiativesliketheXhongileGamePark.AlloftheseconcessionaireshaveMozambicanshareholders,asforeignnationalsarenotallowedtoownlandinMozambique.TheMozambicanshareholdersarepoliticallyconnectedindividualsinMaputo,whoasserttheirinfluenceshouldproblemsarisebetweenconcessionairesand
318
gatheringunitsaredeployedthatworkcloselywiththeanti-poachingforcesintheKNP.
Curiously,Mozambicangovernmentforcessuchasthe“ForçadeGuardaFronteira”(border
guards)defertosecurityofficialsemployedbytheseprivateoperators.Ininstanceswhere
localsareemployedasrangersorguards,familyorcommunitymembersmaybepitted
againstoneanotherduringanti-poachingambushesonprivateland,orwhenpoachers
traversepublicorprivatelandenroutetotheKNP(Interviews,2013).An‘anti-poaching
ambush’isapreventativeattempttoeitherstoppotentialpoachersfromcrossingintothe
KNPortopreventwildlifepoachingontheconcession.404Whiletheterm‘ambush’is
appropriatedfrommilitaryjargon,manyoftheanti-poachingunitsoperatingintheareado
nothavepermitstocarryweapons,405andhence,theelementofsurpriseisusedinsteadof
themilitaryvariantofa“shoottokillapproach”.
Insomeinstances,concessionairesareequippingtheirstaffwithweapons,ascarrying
weaponsmayconstituteagreaterrisktorangerswhostruggletomatchtotheprowessof
theirwell-trainedandbetter-equippedopponents.Moreover,theseweaponscouldgetlost,
stolenorrentedouttopoachers(Interviews,2013).Oneconcessionairesaidforexample:“I
onlytrustmyrangersasfarasIcanseethem”(Interview,2013).Typically,suchambushesare
launchedclosetotheboundarywiththeKNP(theconcessionsserveasabufferzone)andin
concertwiththeanti-poachingoperationsintheKNP.Concealedatstrategiclocationsinthe
bush,agroupofrangers(sometimesincollaborationwithborderguardsorthepolice)will
awaitthearrivalorreturnofsuspectedpoachersandstopthemfromprogressingfurther,and
handthemovertorelevantlawenforcementagents.TheKNPandconcessionairesregard
communities(Interviewsin2013).Interviewswithcommunitymemberslivingontheedgesoftheseconcessionsrevealedthatwhileconcessionaireswereinvestingmoniesintocommunitydevelopmentinitiatives(aspartofthedeal),thecommunitiesperceivedtheseprojectsasaformofplacationtomakegoodonanotherroundofdisplacement.Someconcessionairesareseenasthenew‘colonialmasters’,whoarefencingofftheirpropertiesandbarringaccesstovillagers(Interviews,2013).Labourers,rangersorguardsfromthevillagecommunities,workontheseconcessions.Theyareoftenseverelyunderpaidandnotallowedtobringtheirfamiliestostaywiththemontheconcessions.404KrugerrhinosregularlycrossintotheLNPandontoprivatelandinMozambique.Asthechancesoftheroguerhinosurvivingforanylengthoftimearesuboptimal,rangerswalktherhinobackacrosstheborderandreturnittothecareofKNPrangers(Interviews,2013).405ThereisadueprocesstoapplyforfirearmsinMozambique,whichcanstretchoverseveralmonths.
319
suchambushesasaproactivestrategy,406asriflesandvehiclesareregularlyconfiscated.
However,poachersarelikelytochooseadifferentroute,gatherintelligenceonstandard
operatingprocedures,orpayabribetoavoiddetectioninthepreparationofthenexthunting
expedition.Onseveraloccasions,fieldrangersfoundthemselvesface-to-facewithfamily
membersenroutetotheKNP,ortheworst-casescenario(Interview,2013):
“Myheadranger–wetrackedhisson.WetoldKrugeraboutthegroup.Theyclimbedoverthefence,allthreeofthem.Andheheardontheradiothathissonwaskilledinashootout.”
Anti-poachingoperationsandambusheshaveledtoseveralrevengeattacksanddeath
threatsagainstanti-poachingstaffandconcessionaires.Someconcessionaireshaveresorted
torecruitingrangersandsecuritystafffromotherpartsofthecountrytocircumventthe
possibleconsequencesofthesocialembeddednessofpoachersandrangers.Astheheadof
ananti-poachingunitinMozambiqueexplained(Interviewwithanti-poachingoperative6,
2013):
“Imeanwehaveanobligationtoemploycommunitymembers,butit’simpossibleforacommunitymembertobeaneffectivefieldrep.Hecannotfromalawenforcementperspective,becausehe’sgottogohome.Andwhatmanisnotgoingtoprotecthisownfamily,whatmanisnotgoingtoplaythegameifsomebodycomesandsayslisten,bestyoulooktheotherwaybecauseIknowwhereyoulive.Iknowwhereyourkidsare,whatmanisnotgoingto…youcan’texpecthimto.”
Fieldrangersandscoutswerepaidanaveragewageof3000to4000Metical407permonth
amountingtoabout75to100Euros(Interviews,2013)atthetimeoffieldwork.408
Concessionairesprovideanadditionalbonuscontingentonthesuccessofanti-poaching
operations(Interviewswithconcessionaires,2013).Acommunityleaderputthiswagein
perspective:a50kgbagofricecostabout900Metical(23Euros)atthetime(Interview,June
406Obviously,thisappliesonlytothescenariowherepotentialpoacherswerestoppedbeforeshootingarhino,inwhichcasetheonlychargeablecrimewouldbetrespassingonprotectedlandandcarryinganillegalfirearm(ifthatwerethecase).407TheMeticalistheMozambicancurrency.InNovember2014,oneEurocouldbeexchangedforabout40Metical.408Theminimumwagewasabout2500Meticalpermonthatthetime.InApril2014,theminimumwageofworkersintheagricultural,livestockandforestrysectorswasincreasedto3,100Metical(AgenciadeInformacaodeMocambique30April2014)
320
2013).Incomparison,apoachingteamcouldearn200,000to300,000Metical(5,125to
7,700Euros)perhunt.409Whilethe‘bounty’forrhinohornsappearsrelativelyhighin
comparisontotheminimumwage,itisnegligiblewhencomparedtothepriceofrhinohorn
onconsumermarkets.However,rangersareeasilyswayedtolooktheotherdirectionor
assistwithoperationalintelligence,especiallywhenrelativesareinvolvedinhuntingcrews
(discussedinmoredetailbelow).Inlightofthelowwagesforanti-poachingpersonnel(which
appliestoparksandreservesinSouthAfrica,too),itisalsonotunexpectedthatrangers,field
scoutsandotherstaffinparksstarttheirownhuntingcrews,orbecomeinvolvedinpoaching
tosupplementtheirmeagreearnings.
Turningtothemacro-level:Mozambiquedoesfindherselfinaprecariouspositionwith
regardstotherhinoissue:Ontheonehand,itsneighbourandtransfrontierparkspartner
SouthAfrica,CITESandtheinternationalcommunityarepushingforadequateconservation
laws,acomprehensiveanti-poachingstrategyandatougherstanceagainstpoaching.Onthe
otherhand,thesouthernAfricancountryisfacingincreasingcriticismfromitsowncitizenry
overMozambicannationalsgettingshotandkilled,orarrestedinsidetheKNP.Essentially
rhinopoachingandthemilitarizedresponsestoitarereinforcingthe‘fortress’conservation
paradigmdiscussedinChapter4.Whilevoluntaryresettlementfromconservationareaswas
employedwhentheLNPwasinitiallyestablished(seeChapter4),theMozambican
governmentisusingthesupposedthreatofrhinopoachingfromvillagecommunitiesliving
insidetheLNPtoextenditscontroloverthePark.Governmentofficialsandintelligenceactors
havestigmatizedvillagecommunitiesas‘rhinopoachers’.Thestigmatizationservesthe
prioritizationoftheresettlementofvillagecommunitiesbeyondtheboundariesofthe
LimpopoNationalParkasananti-poachingmeasure,reflectingtheoldconservationadage
thatlocalcommunitiesandwildanimalsaresupposedlyanoxiouscombination.Inaddition,
concessionairesalongtheeasternboundaryareseeingtheirlandtenurerightsprotected
(whichhadbeentenuous)astheirconcessionshavebeendeclaredasbufferzonesinthe
409PoachersoperatingfromtheSouthAfricansideofthebordergetpaidless.Thegoingratein2014wasbetween30,000to50,000Randforapairofhorns(2,200to3,700Euros).
321
nameofprotectingrhinos.410Accordingtoarezoningbriefingdocument(SANParks9July
2012:4–5),theGreatLebomboConservancyistobecome“thefirstshieldofdefenceagainst
rhinopoaching,provideecotourismdevelopmentopportunities(ontheMozambicanside)for
theprivatesectorinvestorsandcreatealogicaldeterrenttopoachingactivitiesthrough
tourismactivities.”Thedeclarationofadditional“intensiveprotectionzones”alongthe
easternborderoftheKrugerNationalParksignalsapotentialreturntoforcedremovals
ratherthan‘voluntaryresettlement’.ItremainsunclearhowtheMozambicangovernment
planstomoveentirevillages,anditbogglesthemindastohowthegeographicdisplacement
ofsuchvillagescouldbeconceivedasanappropriateanti-poachingmeasure.Intelligence
operativesactiveintheborderregionssharedthissentiment(Interviewwithintelligence
operative8;Interviews2013):
“YoumightbemovingpotentialpoachersfurtherawayfromtheParkbutwherethereisawill,thereisaway.Youhavebasicallyjustaddedanother40kmforthemtowalkextraandthattheywillandyouhavemadesomevillagersveryangry.”
Moreover,thegovernmentsofSouthAfricaandMozambiquesignedaMemorandumof
Understanding(MOU)inApril2014toenhancebilateralcooperationwithregardstotherhino
issue.TheMOU,amongstothermeasures,pavedthewayforacontroversiallawenforcement
measurethatallowsforcross-border“hotpursuits”totakeplace.Essentially,thismeasure
allowsSouthAfricanlawenforcementofficialstochaseapoachingsuspectacrosstheborder
withoutawarrantorofficialpermission.ThismeasurehasanastyconnotationintheSouth
AfricancontextasSouthAfricanSpecialForcescrossedintoneighbouringcountriesto
apprehendorevenkillsuspectsduringtheapartheidregime(Orkin/CommunityAgencyfor
SocialEnquiry1989:127–128).Rhinoprotectionstrategiessuchastheresettlementof
“problemvillages”,thecreationof“totalprotectionzones”and“hotpursuits”signalareturn
tofortressconservationinazerosumgame,whichseeswildlifeconservationpittedagainst
theinterestsofruralvillagecommunities.The‘quasi’waragainstpoachingappearstobe
strengtheningthesymbolic(anddeadly)messagethatpoachingofrhinosisillegalintheKNP;
410MasséandLunstrum(2016)havedevelopedtheconceptof“accumulationbysecuritization”tocapturethenexusbetweenconservation-securitization,capitalaccumulationanddispossession.Theresearchersdiscusstheincreasingprivatizationandsecuritizationofresponsestorhinopoaching,whichalsoincludeslandgrabs.
322
however;ontheground,thereareperceptionsthatthestatehasinstituted“shoottokill”
policiestoprotectrhinos(wildanimals)andkillvillagers.
Whenaskedwhethertherhinocarriedculturalsignificanceorsymbolicvalue,convicted
poachersandkingpinsobservedthattherhinowas“feared”,“admired”and“respected”but
nothunted.Kidswerewarnedtostayclearoftherhinobecauseitwasan“angry”and
“dangerous”wildanimal(Interviews,2013).Inthecurrentcontextofexpandingtransfrontier
conservationinitiatives,the“white”rhinohastakenonasymbolicmeaning,representingthe
continuedmulti-layeredmarginalizationofvillagecommunities.Eachfallenrhinowhittles
awayfromthenotionof‘peaceparks’andthelong-termsustainabilityofconservationareas.
Poachersarekillingthe‘whitemen’s’naturalheritage,whichwassociallyconstructed
throughsuccessiveregimesofexploitationanddispossessionoflocalpeoplelivingnearparks.
Rhinosarenotonlykilledforprofit,buttheyarealsokilledfortheirsymbolicvalue.The
deadlyanti-poachingmeasuresandthevillagecommunity-unfriendlyexpansiondrivesof
conservationareasareexacerbatingtherhinoproblembyturningvillagecommunitiesagainst
wildanimals.Meanwhile,thedeadlyroleof‘white’rhinopoachingsyndicates(seediscussion
inChapter6)indestroyingthesamenaturalheritageisdownplayedinthemainstream
discourse,suggestingthereturntotherace-basednormativecategoriesof‘blackpoachers’
(badhunter)versus‘whitehunters’(goodhunter).
7.5RolesandfunctionswithinpoachinggroupsInterviewswithkingpins,intermediaries,smugglersandpoachersandtheirlawenforcement
nemeses(Interviews,2013)revealedthathuntingexpeditionsintoparksandreservesrange
fromhighlyorganized,well-plannedandexecuted,toopportunistic,andsometimeschaotic
operations.Tidingsofthehighearningsattachedtorhinopoachinghaveledtoamateurs
seizingtheopportunity,andembarkingonchaoticbadlyplannedincursionsintoreservesand
parks.Whilesomeopportunistsarecaughtandarrested,otherssucceed.411Kingpinsusually
411Ananti-poacher(Interview,KZN,2013)relatedhowanobeseteacherfromanurbancentreinSouthAfricahadjoinedaspontaneouslyconstitutedpoachinggroup.Thequartetjumpedintoasaloon(aninappropriatevehiclewhendrivingonsandroadsinthebush),stoppedontheroadnexttoarhinoreserve.Afterscalingthe
323
coordinatehighlyorganizedoperations,whichcomewiththepromiseoffringebenefitsto
poacherssuchas“lifeinsurance”inthecaseofdeath,andlegalsupportandaccesstotop
criminallawyersinthecaseofcapture.412Theytolerate‘unattached’orindependenthunting
crews,manyofwhomultimatelychoosetocooperatewiththekingpinsastheyhaveready
accesstobuyers,huntingrifles,ammunition,andtheyprovidelogisticalsupportbeforeand
afterhunts.Whiletherewasnoevidencethatkingpinsorcompetingpoachingcrews
informedonunattachedorlessexperiencedhuntingcrews,therewasasense413thatthe
unluckyonesservedascannonfodderor“deadcowsforpiranhas”(seenextchapter).A
kingpinexplainedthatthe“bosses”hadapreferenceformultiplerhinohuntstotakeplace
concurrently.ThePark’ssecurityforceshaveonlythecapacitytodealwithalimitednumber
of“trespassing”incidents–“maybeoneortwo”whiletheothers“willstillbringbackthe
horn”(Interview,Cubo,2013).Somehuntingexpeditionsarechoreographedinsuchan
efficientmannerthattheoutgoinghuntingcrewwillswaphuntingriflesandintelligenceon
freshrhinotracksandthepositionofanti-poachingunitsastheypasstheincomingcrew.
Originallykingpinsrecruitedtheirownhuntingteamsfromlocalvillagerswhowerefirmly
embeddedintheircommunitiesandcouldbetrustedtobringbacktherhinohorn.However,
newsofthegoodfortunesofrhinopoachershastravelledbeyondthevillagecommunitiesin
andaroundtheparks.Manynewhopefulsarrivedailyinthehopeofgettingrecruitedinto
poachingcrews.Initially,kingpinswereseekingtorecruitmenwithhuntingorbushtracking
skills.Intheaftermathofthedecades-longcivilwarinMozambique,manymen(andwomen)
possessmilitaryandtrackingskills,andsomehaveaccesstooldweaponsfromcaches
situatedintheborderareas.414IntheearlyphaseofpoachingintheKNP,Portuguesecolonial
gamefencewithdifficulty,ananti-poachingunitinterceptedthem.Theunfitteacherwasapparentlystrugglingtokeepupwiththerestofhiscrew.412Thesefringebenefitsmayormaynotmaterializeasinterviewswithseveralconvictedpoachersrevealed.The“boss”hadarrangedforlegalrepresentationinafewcases.Ahandfuloflegalteamsappeartodefendtheserhinocriminals;inotherwords,thesamecriminallawyersappearonbehalfofallegedrhinocriminalsinSouthAfricancourts(Interviewwithprosecutors,2013).413Someconvictedpoachersclaimedthattheywereunluckyandgotcaughtduringtheirveryfirsthunt.Whilefewcriminalswouldadmittoanycrimesbeyondthecrimeathand,somemighthavebeen‘unluckyfirst-timers’.414Trainedinlowintensitywarfare,ex-soldierswithbush-trackingskillsfromthedaysoftheapartheidbushwarswereconnectedwithanumberofpoachingincidentsingamereservesandparksinKwaZulu-Natal.
324
huntingriflesandoldriflesdatingfromtheCivilWarwereusedtokillrhinos,fittedwith
homemadesilencers.Astherhinofortunesgrew,kingpinsandhuntersinvestedin
sophisticatedhuntingriflessuchasCZ-550s,aswellasMauser.458’s,.375’s,typicallyusedby
trophyhunterstoshootrhinosorelephants.Onekingpinsaidthatheandoneofhisclose
associateswouldalsoprovideweaponstrainingtonewrecruits.Anotherkingpinaccepted
newrecruitsoncetheyhadpassedatest,whichcouldrangefromhuntingbushmeatthrough
toacquiringhuntingriflesthroughaholduporrobbery.415Kingpinssetupthepoachingcrews,
whichwillconsistofahunter,atrackerandafoodandwatercarrier(whomayalsocarrythe
horns).Thenumberofparticipantsinhuntingcrewsis,however,variabledependingonthe
projecteddurationofthestayinsidethepark.Inlightofdecliningrhinonumbersand
increasingpressurefromanti-poachingunits,poachingcrewsspendlongerperiodsoftime
trackingrhinosandevadingdetectioninthePark.Thedurationofthehuntingexpeditionis
contingentonthereliabilityofthegroup’sintelligence.Thischangedstateofaffairshadledto
theenlargementofsomehuntingcrews.Additionalmembersareenlistedtocarryextra
provisionsforlongerstaysintheparkandtoprovideprotectionincaseofdetection.416Larger
groupsmaysplituponcetheyareinsidethePark.SomehuntingcrewsentertheParklegally
andbookintosafaricamps;othersuseoneofthemanyfootpathsandanimalmigration
routestraversingparks,reservesandwildernessareas.Whenrhinopoachingincreasedin
frequencyinthelate2000s,poachingcrewsconcentratedonareaswithhighrhinodensities
inthesouthernpartsofthePark.WhenenteringKrugerfromtheMozambicanside,poachers
aredroppedoffascloselyaspossibletothefenceline.Anoff-streetvehicle(aso-calledfour-
by-fourdrive)isneededtodrivealongtheotherwiseimpassablesandroads.Anotheroption
furthersouthisthehiringofaboattorowacrosstheCorumanadam,orsimplytowade
acrosstheSabiRiver.
415Gameandcommercialfarmersarereputedtoholdhuntingriflesandotherhighcalibreriflesontheirproperties.Organizedcrimeinvestigators(Interviews,2013)pointedtothepossibleconnectionbetweenfarmattacksandrhinopoaching;however,onlytenuouslinksweremadebetweenballisticsatrhinocrimescenesandstolenhuntingrifles.416ThehighrateofpoacherfatalitiesintheKNPhasledtosomegroupscarryinghandgunsforself-defencepurposes.
325
AccordingtoKNPanti-poachingofficials(personalcommunication,2015),therewasan
availablepoolof2500to3000poachersinandaroundthenationalpark417andanaverageof
tentofifteenhuntingcrewsweretrackingrhinosatanygivenpointintimein2015(seeGraph
6).WhenillegalhuntingintotheKNPcommencedinthelate2000s,huntingcrewswerestill
learningtheropesandmistakesweremade,butthecrewslearntrapidly,adaptedtheir
modusoperandiandupgradedtheir‘toolbox’.Aninvestigator(InterviewwithKNP
investigator,2013)pointstotheinferiortypesofgun,ammunitionandsloppyexecutionof
earlypoachingintheKNP.SomepoachersusedAK-47’sandmultipleshotsinlieuofthe
professional‘one-shot-kill’totheheartorlungs.Inthemodernpoacher’stoolboxare
sophisticatedhuntingrifles,machetesoraxes,satellitenavigationsystemsormobilephones
(sometimesevenGPS-enabledsmartphones).Whilethereisnonetworksignalinmanyparts
oftheKNP,Movitel418cellphonetowersaresprinkledacrosstheMozambicanborderlands,
whichfacilitatecommunicationbetweenkingpinsandpoachersoncetheygetclosetothe
Mozambicanborder.Theterm“poacher’smoon”usedtobesynonymouswithahigherrate
ofrhinoattrition.Thenaturallightofthefullmoonlightshinesthepoachers’pathduringthe
fullmoonperiodhencetheterm“poacher’smoon”.Whilerhinopoachingisstillrifeduring
poacher’smoon,illegalhuntersaretraversingtheparkdayandnightinsearchoftheir
bounty.KrugerofficialsalsofoundthatpoachingratesspikedbeforeEastAsianholidays419
andduringtheChristmasholidayseason.420
Kingpinswereinitiallyinvolvedinillegalhuntingexpeditionsthemselves;nowadaysthey
executemultiplefunctionsessentialtothecontinuityoftheflow.Itisimportantto
417Thisnumberhadgrownto6000poachersinandroundtheParkby2016(pers.communicationwithJulianRademeyerandKNPofficials,2016).418MovitelisajointventurebetweenViettelGlobal,aVietnamesetelecommunicationscompanyownedbytheVietnameseMinistryofDefence,andMozambicanpartners.ThefirstcellphonetowerswereerectedinOctober2011,andthecompanylaunchedofficiallyinMay2012.MovitelwasthefastestgrowingtelecommunicationcompanyintheMiddleEastandAfricain2014(ITNewsAfrica2014).419Nosupportingdatacouldbeprovidedforthisclaim.However,severalrangersandsecuritypersonnelsuggestedthatAsianintermediarieswerereturninghometospendholidayswiththeirfamiliesandcapitalizedonthereturntripbytransportinghornbackhome.420CrimestatisticsconfirmaspikeinpropertycrimesduringthefestiveseasoninSouthAfrica(Lancaster2014).Thereisnoempiricalevidencetoexplainthephenomenon.Accordingtoanecdotalaccounts,thievesseizeopportunitieswhileholidaymakerslettheirguarddown.Withregardstospikesinrhinopoaching,anti-poachingoperatives(Interviews,KNP,2013)suggest,“PoacherscelebrateChristmastoo”.
326
differentiatebetweenhuntersandkingpinswithintheoverallstructureoftheflow.Although
poachinggroupsdisplayaflatstructurebyvirtueofrelationshipsbeingreliantonreciprocal
trustand“everyonefacesthesamefearsandrisksinthebush”(Interview,2013),theposition
ofthehunterisattributedwiththehigheststatusandcommensuratewiththemost
rewardingremunerationwithinpoachinggroups.Thehunteristhustheunofficialleaderof
thegroupinthebush.Oncethehuntingcrewleavesthebush,thebuckstopswiththe
kingpin,whowearsmanydifferenthatsbutmostimportantlyhehastoassurethatthehorn
movesfurtheralongtheflow.Whatdifferentiateskingpinsfrompoachersandothermembers
ofvillagecommunitiesistheirsocialcapital,whichincorporatestheabilitytocommunicate
andtradebeyondtheconfinesofvillagecommunities.Ontheonehand,kingpinsare
competenteconomicactorsthatholdthekeytolocalhorntransactions;ontheotherhand,
thesekingpinsexudehighlevelsofsocialandcross-culturalmobilityenablingthemto
undertakebusinesswithcriminalactorstranscendingboundariespresentedbyethnicity,
languageandnationality.Kingpinsrecruit,mobilizeandmotivateotherstopartakeinhunting
expeditionsthatinvolvetheillegalkillinganddehorningofrhinosinprotectedareas.They
ensurethathuntsgoaheadwithoutdisruptionsbythegovernmentortraditionalauthorities;
inotherwords,standingarrangementsexisttoensuretheundisturbedflowofhornfromthe
parktothebuyer(discussedinmoredetailbelow).Oncethekingpintakesreceiptofthehorn,
aprocessofqualitycontrolcommences(seeChapter8).Uponconfirmingweight,provenance
andauthenticityofthehorn,thekingpin‘secures’thehornfromdetectionthroughlaw
enforcementforitsonwardjourney.Kingpins,poachersandsmugglersconfirmedthatthe
hornisleftintact;inotherwords,itisnotprocessedintodisks,piecesorpowderatthe
source.Asananti-poachingmeasure,somerhinoscarrysatellitetrackersintheirhorns.
Poachingcrewsuserubbertubesofcartirestodisruptthetrackersignalenroutetothe
kingpin(Interviewwithpoacher15,2013).Thekingpinwillboilthehorntostoporganic
materialfromreleasingputridsmell,421whichcouldattracttheattentionofsnifferdogs.To
permanentlydisruptthetrackingdevice,kingpinsputthehornintoanoven,‘baking’the
trackingdeviceatextremelyhightemperaturesforseveralhours.Thisprocessdestroysthe
421Thehornisusuallyremovedascloseaspossibletothegrowthpointtomaximizeweightandprofit.Hackingorcuttingclosetothegrowthpointinevitablyinvolvesbloodandgore,whichdecomposeandrotoncetakenoffarhino.
327
signalpermanently(Interviewwithkingpin2,2013).Thesesecurityandqualitycontrol
measuresshowcasesophisticatedplanningandforesightofwildlifetraffickinggroups.
Kingpinsalsoprovidetheimportantbridgebetweenpoacherandbuyerbyfacilitatingthesafe
andspeedypassageofhornfromtheparktothebuyerorsmuggler.Thisprocessearnsthem
doublecommission;theythusprofitfrom“buying”thehornfromtheirownorindependent
poachingcrews,andfromsellingthehorntothesmugglerorbuyer.Initially,rhinohornwas
suppliedtoSouthAfricanbuyers,whoarrangeditsintegrationintograyandlegalflows.The
migrationtonewbuyers(ChineseandVietnamesebuyers),localmarkets(Chokwe,Maputo,
Beira)androutes(fromMaputo,Nairobi,LusakatoMiddleEasternandAsianentrepôtsor
directlytothemarket)appearstohavebeentriggeredbyopportunitystructurespresentedby
thegeographiclocationofMozambique,thehighpresenceofrhinosclosetotheMozambican
borderintheKNP,andthestateofthecriminaljusticesysteminthatcountry.Inthelate
2000s,kingpinsandindependentpoacherssoughtoutnewbuyerstointroducecompetition
andnegotiatebetterpricesforthehorn.Therapprochementbetweenkingpins,poachersand
Asianbuyerswasactivelypursued,andbusinessconnectionswereestablishedthrough
opportunisticmeetingsorreferrals.Inthisinstance,thekingpin’sworldlinessandsocialskills
facilitatedtheestablishmentofnewcriminalconnections.Asonekingpinputit:“Ifyouwant
tosellarhinohorn,yougotoAsianmarketsorChinatownandspeaktoanyone”.Manyofthe
extantkingpinshaveworkedandtravelledbeyondtheirvillagecommunities,whichallowed
themtoreachoutandestablishbothstrongandweakconnectionsinSouthAfricaand
beyond.
Whilebusinessalliancesarefluidandreinventedfrequently,thedemandhasgrowntothe
extentthathornispre-orderedand,insomecases,adepositispaidtoensureexclusive
deliverytotheorderingparty.Thetime-spanbetweenplacingtheorderandreceivingthe
hornplaysasignificantrole,especiallyincaseswherecouriersarealreadyawaitingtheir
consignment.Transportersandbuyers(Interviews,2013)henceprefertoengagewith
kingpinswhohaveareputationforspeedydeliveryofthegenuineproduct.Thereare
howevernoexclusiverelationships;inotherwords,kingpinsengagewithanumberofbuyers
andviceversa.Moreover,somekingpinscombineintermediaryandtransportfunctions.In
328
suchcases,thekingpinoratrustedassociatetransportsthehorntothebuyerorcourier,or
thelatterundertakesthejourneytofetchthehorn(whichhappensonrareoccasions).
Althoughtheinitialprocurementofrhinohornisessentialtoinitiatingthisillegalflow,
securingitsonwardjourneyisequallyimportantandnavigatedthroughrelationshipsbuilton
trustandthereputationofthoseinvolved.Kingpinshavestruckupdealswithlaw
enforcementofficialsinsomeinstances,wherebyapoliceofficertransportsrhinohorntothe
buyerorensuresitssafepassage(morebelow).Anorganizedcrimeinvestigator(Interview,
2013)describesthenextlevelofsophistication:
“Andthenyougetsituationswherethepoacherspay30,000Randdangerpaytohuntarhino.Theyshootarhinoandtheyimmediatelygetpaid25,000to30,000Randperkilo.Nowtheycanaffordit,likethebigJoealso.Heknowsthatthenextlevelisthemarket.Thegoodthingabouthisoperation,hedoesnotstandtherisktobeshotorapprehended.Heminimisesriskbytransportingitinataxi,transportitinaprivatevehicle,aslongasIkeepontheroad,getthehorntomymarketsandsellitoff.AndyouseethecurrentcaseinSkukuza:atrafficcopfromtheKruger,agamerangerandanotherstaffmember.Thegamerangershootstherhinoandthetrafficcoptransportsthehornoutsidetheparkandthenaskedhiswifetotransferitfurthertothemarket.Howyougoingtostopatrafficcop?Heisapoliceofficer.Organizedcrimeatitsbest.ThewifesoldittothemarketinJohannesburg.”422
Themostcommonformofhorntransportationfromthebordervillagesinvolvesacloseand
trustedassociateofthekingpintransportingthehorntothebuyerortransnationalcourier.
Theselocalhorncourierstendtousepublictransport–busesandminibustaxis–commuting
betweenGazaProvinceandMaputo(oroneoftheothertranshipmenthubs,seebelow).
Publictransportprovidesanotherlayerofprotectiontothecourier.Inthecaseofdetection,
thecouriercaneasilyshifttheblametothedriverorfellowpassengers.Localcouriershave
trust-basedrelationshipswithkingpinsanchoredthroughfamilial,kinshiporpastcriminal
relationships;kingpinsseldomuseso-called“runners”,astheriskofdetectionanddefection
istoouncertain.Onesmugglersaid(Interviewwithsmuggler4,2013):
“Ican’tseesomeonetrustingarunnerinthestreettotransportarhinohorninataxi.Maybetheystoleitsomewhere.I,asasupplier,wouldnotdothat.Iwouldwanttohaveacleandeal.LikeaguylikeMrBig,whereIknowifhedoesn’tpayme,Ikillhim.
42225000Randwasworth€1870and30000Randwas€2240atthetimeoftheinterview.
329
Simplebecausethatisthedeal,youtakethisfrommethisismymoney.Ifyoudon’tdoit,Iknowwhereyoulive.Ikillyou.Withsmallrunnersyoudon’thaveit.Itislikedrugs.Youknowwheretheguylivesandifhedoesn’tpay,thenthereisanaccident.”
Theroleofthetraditionalintermediarywhointeractswithpoachersonbehalfofbuyersis
morecommoninrhinohornflowsoutofSouthAfrica.Inthisinstance,theintermediary
constitutesanothersegmentornodalpointintheflow.Ontheonehand,theintermediary
negotiatestheprice,providesbothpoacherandbuyerwithanonymityfromoneanotherand
henceanadditionallayerofprotectionfromdetection;ontheotherhand,thisadditional
segmentrenderstheexchangelessefficientbutmoresecureandcreatessocialdistance
betweenpoacherandbuyer(thesecurity/efficiencytrade-offisdiscussedinmoredetail
below).Othertasksincludequalitycontrol,moneylaunderingandoff-shoreinvestments,as
wellasthecoordinationoflocalandinternationaltransportlogistics.Unlikethekingpins,the
traditionalintermediaryneedsnocharismaorsocialskills.Goodcontactsinthecriminal
underworldandlawenforcementare,however,obligatory.Thistypeofintermediaryhas
well-establishedlegitimatebusinessorinvestmentlinkstoSouthAfricanorAsianbuyers,
whichjustifyclosetiesintheeyesoftheoutsideworld.Sheistheknown‘go-to’personwhen
poachersarelookingforabuyer.Duetotheexpediency,efficiencyandsecurityofflowsout
ofMozambique,theroleofthetraditionalintermediaryislargelyobsoleteordiminished.As
poachingcrewsgetbetterfinancialrewardsinMozambique,SouthAfricanpoachersare
increasinglymovingtheirhornsuppliestoMozambique(Interviews,2013and2014).423
7.6Cooperation,securityandcompetition:Howkingpinssecurethecontinuityoftheflow
Akingpin’ssphereofinfluenceisspatiallyconfinedtohisgeographiclocationandreach.The
leveloftoleranceandindependencebetweenthedifferentMrBig’sisremarkable;however,a
formofhegemony(‘peggingorder’)wascarefullynegotiatedintheMozambicanhinterlands
basedonseniority,popularity,thenumberofteamsandthedurabilityandstrengthof
networkconnections.Areasofinfluencearefluidandhenceopentonegotiation.One
423Theygetintroducedtokingpinsorintermediariesthroughkinshiptiesorcriminalconnections.
330
Massingir-basedkingpininformsonhiscompetition(‘rats’themout)whentheiractivitieslead
tobotchedhorndealsortheyundercuthisprice;hethusassertshisinfluenceand“putsthem
backintheirplace”(Interviewwithanti-poachingofficial,2013).Anotherkingpinisreputedto
haveapenchantforviolenceandcoercion(Interviews,2013);however,turfissuesand
competitionaremorepronouncedontheSouthAfricansidewhereaformerpoliceofficerran
theBushbuckridgeandHazyviewareaswithanironfistuntilhisarrestin2012(Interviews,
2013).424AconvictedpoacherfromMozambiqueexplainsthedifference(Interviewwith
poacher3,2013):
“ItissafertodealwiththeMozambicansthanSouthAfricans.Theycanpayyouandthengetsomeonetokillyouafterthedeal.Thentakebackthemoneythey’vepaidyou-andthathappensalot.AndthebossesfromMozambiquepaymorethanSouthAfricanbossesbecauseitiseasiertotransportfromMozambique.Theycangetatruckfulloflogsorwoodsandtheycanputthehornsunderneath.Theyeventransportthegunsthatway.”
Atthetimeofdatacollection,therewaslittlecompetitionorconflictamongstpoaching
groupsorpronounced‘turfissues’.Pressedaboutcompetitionorthepotentialforconflict,
onekingpin(Interview,2013)explainedhowhuntingcrewsdealwithoneanother:
“Itdoesnothappen.NooneownstheKrugerandevenwhenwemeetwejustgreeteachotherandit’snotoftenthatweseeeachother.”
Thestructureandcompositionofhuntingcrewsminimizetheriskof“takingout”another
groupwhileonthehunt.Thereisahighlikelihoodthatthehuntersknoweachother,they
mighthavehuntedtogetherinthepast,maydosointhefuture,ortheymightbetiedtoone
anotherthroughkinshiporfriendshipties.Severalkingpinsandpoacherstalkedaboutthe
potentialforconflictandcompetitiononcerhinonumbersgrewless;highdemandonrare
resourcesislikelytoleadtoconflict-ladensocialrelationsanddiversificationintoother
covetedwildlifeproductslikeivory(Interviewwithkingpins,2013).
424AllegedSouthAfricanrhinokingpin“BigJoe”Nyalunga,aformerpoliceofficer,wieldedconsiderableinfluenceoverpeopleandauthoritieslivingintheBushbuckridgeareaneartheKNP.Healsohasareputationforviolence,andthereareanecdotalclaimsthathemurderedandtorturedaman.
331
Kingpinsareconfrontedwiththepotentialdefectionoftheirhuntingcrews.Severaltypesof
defectionaretheoreticallypossible,someofwhicharelinkedtothedangersandchallenges
ofillegalhuntinginprotectedareas.Therearenaturaldangersassociatedwithhikingthrough
thebush,suchasrunningintodangerousanimals425orexposuretotheelements.426Poachers
alsofacethepotentialdetection,arrestordeathsbysecurityforcesdeployedinconservation
areas.Asmentionedinearliersections,kingpinsandtheirnetworkconnectionsensurelegal
representationforpoachersandsmugglers;finesandbailaretakencareof,especiallyincases
wherethearresteemighthaveaccesstoprivilegedinformationthatcoulddisrupttheflow.
Thelongerittakestotrackandshootarhino,thehigherthelikelihoodofdetection,andthe
longeruntilthebuyertakesreceiptoftheorderofrhinohorn.Timeandspeedofexecution
arehenceimportantelementsintheplanningphaseofanillegalhunt.Actionableintelligence
orknowledgeofrecentrhinosightings,tracksorlocations,andthepositionandmovements
ofsecuritypersonnelshortenthedurationintheparkandthusminimizetheriskofdetection.
Suchintelligenceiseithergatheredproactivelyorboughtfromso-called“spotters”,whowork
inparksorreservesandarehencewellacquaintedwithstandardoperatingprocedures,shift
rostersandrhinosightings(Interviewswithanti-poachingofficials,2013).Anorganizedcrime
investigatorputitlikethis(Interview,2013):
“Thefieldrangersgetpaid5,000Randnow,sowhenoneoftheseguyscomewith50,000Randtoshowthemtherhino,whatisyourchoicegoingtobe?Doyourememberwhentheyhadtheillegalstrikeinsidethepark?AndalltheRangersparkedouthere.Theywereouthereforaboutamonth.Itwassoeasytomakecontactwiththeseguysandgivethemacellphonenumberthattheycancontacttheseguys.Youknow–attheendofthedayweallhaveaprice.SyndicatebossespayonehundredthousandRandsothatadocketislost.”427
425KNPrangersranintoanownotoriouskingpinwhowasahunterafewyearsback.Hehadbeenmauledduringalionattackwhileonarhinohunt.Whentherangerscameacrosshimandhisteammate,theyclaimedtobelookingforworkinSouthAfrica.Thepairwastakentothenexthospital,treatedandreleased.Rangersfoundthehuntingriflesafewdayslater(Interviews,KNP,2013).426LargepartsoftheKNParemadeupofdry“bushveld”(SouthAfricantermfordrysavannahs).Temperaturesrangeinthelate30stoearly40sinthesummermonths,andthemercurydropscloseto0degreesinwinternights.Floodsareacommonoccurrenceduringtherainyseason,whenotherwisedryriverbedsswelltofullcapacityandbeyond,sometimessweepingawayrestcampsandparkinfrastructures.4275000Randwasworth427€and50000Randwas4275€atthetimeofdatacollection.
332
Paymenttomembersofpoachinggroupsisdisbursedonaslidingscalelinkedtofunctions,
responsibilitiesandgunownershipofindividualgroupmembers.‘Payments’(bribes)togame
rangers,lawenforcementofficialsandothersocialcontrolagentsarestandardpracticeand
consideredoperationalcosts(Interviewwithkingpin,2013).Incaseswherenostanding
agreementexists(securing“freepassage”ofpoachinggroupsformspartofthekingpin’s
coordinationrepertoire),poacherswillcarrymoneyonthem“tofreethemselves”shouldthey
“runintotrouble”(Interviewwithkingpin2).The‘bounty’ontherhinoandthelowwages
paidtogamerangers,aswellassituationalinsiderknowledge,standardoperatingprocedures
ofanti-poachingunitsrenderstaffentrustedwithprotectingrhinosparticularlyvulnerableto
acceptingbribesorrecruitmentintopoachinggroups.SaysaMassingir-basedkingpin
(Interview,2013):
“Wearescaredoftherangers.Iamsoscaredofthem.SouthAfricanrangerswillkillyoubuttherangersinMozambiquetakebribes.Therearerangerswhoworkwiththehunters.There’sarangerwhohashisowngroupofhunters.He’sgotahighpositionthere, and if he finds a hunter that is not in his group hewill shoot him, andmosthuntersknowhim.”
FieldworkundertakenintheborderlandsadjacenttotheKNP(alsoknownasthe“eastern
boundary”)foundanetworkofborderprotectionstaff(ForçadeGuardaFronteira),rangers
fromtheLNPandtheKNP,privatesecurityandintelligenceoperatorsandpoachersthat
directlyaffecttheprotection(orlackthereof)oftherhino.Theofficial‘protectors’(game
rangers)andtheborderguardsareimportantelementswithintheillegalflowastheyprovide
protection,information,andinsomeinstances,gunstothepoachers.Aconservatorin
Mozambiquerevealed(Interviewwithconservator8,2013):
“Theguardiansoftheparkarecomplicit.Weconfiscatedthesamegunthreetimesandweconfiscategoodhuntingriflesfrompoachersallthetime.TheyrentitfromrangersintheLimpopoNationalPark.Oneofthemainrangershadallthemainguysunderhisprotection.Noonecoulddoanything.Sowehadthismassiveeventandgotthegovernortotalkaboutanti-poaching.Soinfrontofthisguy,wegaveabigspeechwiththeGuardaFronteira.Thentherewaspoliticalpressure,andtheyremovedalltheGuardaFronteiraandthentheyphonedmeandsaidtheyhadjustgoneintoalittlevillageandhadconfiscated42rifles.Asitturnsout,theyconfiscatedalloftheLimpopoNationalPark’sgunsbecausetheywerecorruptandhadnocontroloverwhohadaccesstotheguns.Theywererentingouttheguns.Itwasanabsolutedogshow.Foroneyear,theLimpopoNationalParkdidn'thaveanyAK-47s.”
333
Thedefectionofpoachingcrewrepresentsanotherrisk.Thiscantaketheformofsellingthe
orderedrhinohorntoahigherbidderorthetheftoffreshlyharvestedhornbycompetitors.428
Failingtodeliverorderedrhinohornorrenegingonpaymentforhorncanleadtonegative
sanctionsandconsequencesforthepoacherortheirfamilies.“Igetmyboystogetthem”,
saidonekingpin,alludingtotheuseofforceincaseofdefection.However,theneedfor
directenforcementorcoercionappearstoberareontheMozambicanside,asthekingpin
knowsandrecruitshispoachingcrewspersonallyandoftensharesstronglinkswiththemand
theirextendedfamilies.
Criminalandterroristnetworksusetrustandsecrecyasmechanismstoconcealcriminal
activitiesandassociations(Morselli/Giguère/Petit2007).Atthevillagelevel,itisdifficultto
hideclandestineactivitiesorliaisons,becauseboundariesbetweenpublicandprivatelifeare
fluid.Inotherwords,thereislimitedroomforanonymityandprivacy.Illegaleconomic
activitiesareembeddedinvillagecommunitiesandhaveledtochangesinthesocial
stratificationofthecommunity.Asarguedinearliersectionsofthischapter,thecommunityis
notcomplicitinrhinopoachingperse;communitymembersdo,however,knowwhothe
bossesandpoachersare,andareawareoftheotherconnectionstheycultivate.Whilethe
compositionofvillagesisheterogeneous,communitymembersareboundtogetherbytheir
sharedexperienceofeconomicdisplacement,marginalizationandexclusion.Thetraditional
notionofsecrecy(keepingcertainfactshiddenfrompublicview)isnotrelevanttovillage
communities;thebindingmechanismpreventingvillagers(includingcriminalactors)from
divulginginformationtounknownentitiesorpersonsisbasedonsolidarityandethical,
culturalandcommunitybuildingmechanisms,whichpreventvillagersfromstigmatizingtheir
owninfrontofothers.Irefertothismechanismas‘villagekinship’,whichextendstheideaof
socialembeddedness.Kingpinsandpoachersthusresolvethecoordinationproblemof
securitythroughvillagekinshipatthevillagelevel.Thevillagewillkeepthe“secret”untilit
becomesuntenableoraffectsthewell-beingofthecommunity.Inthecurrentdispensation,
rhinokingpinsandpoachersappeartoactintheinterestofthecommunitywhiletheParkand
rangershavebeen“undermining”theinterestsofthecommunity.
428Aconvictedpoacherrelatedanincidentwherepoachersworkingfortwodifferentbossesattackedareturninghuntingcrew,stealingtheirbounty.Thetwokingpinsresolvedtheturfissuepeacefully.
334
Oncerhinohornmovesbeyondtheconfinesofthecommunity,othermechanismsbecome
relevant.AnearliersectionofthischapterdescribedhowkingpinsmigratedfromSouth
AfricanbuyerstoAsianbuyers.Thiswasaproactivebutdangerousmoveatthetime.At
present,kingpinscollectintelligenceaheadofmeetingwithpotentialfuturebusiness
partners.Onekingpinrelated(Interview,2013):
“Iknowthecustomersfrommypast,butifpeoplecallmeforthefirsttimeIdon’tgivethemthecorrectinformation.Igivethemthewronginformation.ThenIsendmyguystogoandcheckwhoarrivedattheplace.Maybeoneguyortwoguys,andifwedon’tsuspect anything, my guys will bring the people to me. I make sure there’s nopolice.”429
Beyondtraversingdifficultterrain,poachersfaceamultitudeofdangersandrisksforwhich
theyhavedevelopedinnovativeprotectivemeasures.Brotherhoodexistsbetweenpoaching
crewsfromvillagecommunities:Informationonrhinosightingsandrangerpresenceis
shared.AnearlywarningsystemhasbeendevisedinMassingir:differenttypesofcooldrink
cansontheroofrackofkingpin’soff-streetvehiclesignalwhetheritissafetoheadintothe
KNP.Poachersalsoconsultwithtraditionalhealers(so-calledsangomas)aheadofpoaching
expeditions.Asangomawilladviseastowhenitwouldbesafeforpoacherstoslipthrough
thefencelineandhuntrhino.Theyalsoprepare‘muti’(traditionalmedicine)toprotect
poachersduringthehunt.430Somesangomasrecommendtheremovaloftheeyesandearsof
thedeadrhinoaftertheanimalhasbeenkilled.Accordingtopoachers(Interviews,2013),
“therhino’ssoulcan’thearorseeyou[thepoacher]andcan’tshowwhoyou[thepoacher]
are.”Anti-poachingofficialsconfirmedthattheyencountercarcassesofrhinoswherethe
eyeshavebeencutoutwithmachetesorhandknives(Interviews,2013).Anewtrendrelates
totheremovalofrhinofeetandgenitals.431Theroleofthesangomaisattributedtohigh
429Thesameprocedurewasfollowedaheadoftheinterviewwithme.IwasaskedtomeetthekingpinataspecificrestaurantinMassingir.Theinterviewwasscheduledfor12o’clock.Severalpeoplepassedthroughtherestaurantduringthecourseofthenextthreehours.AftermycompanionandIhadpassedmuster,thekingpinandhisassociatearrivedfortheinterview.430Oneanti-poachingofficial(Interview,2013)recountedthathefoundraweggsinthepocketofapoacher.ThesangomahadtoldthemanthathewouldhavetoturnaroundassoonastheeggbrokebecauseitwouldnolongerbesafeinthePark.Theeggwasintactatthetimeofthepoacher’sarrest.431SouthAfricanconservators(personalcommunication,2015)believethatthesebodypartsaresoldtothelocalmutimarket.
335
statusandinfluenceinvillagelife.Manypoachersrelatedhowthesangoma’ssanctioningofa
plannedhuntwasasimportantasleasingthegun.Inessence,thesangomalegitimizedthe
illegalexpeditionintheParkbyprovidingprotectionandthego-ahead.AccordingtoKruger
officials(Interviews,2013and2014),therewereacoupleofMozambicansangomasrunning
poachinggroups.
7.7Smugglingthehorn:Efficiencyversussecurityconcerns
Theheterogeneousprofileoflocalandinternationaltransportersandtheirstrategic
deploymentisnoteworthy.Transportintermediariesactingonbehalfoftheinternational
buyer(predominantlyAsian)areindividualswithlegitimatebusinessinthevillage
communitiesorinlocalmarkets,suchasrunningalocalretailbusinessorinvolvementinthe
telecommunications,constructionoruniversitysector.Themodeofinlandtransportationand
transhipmenthubchangesfrequently,contingentonthechoiceoftranscontinental
transportation.Researchelsewhere(Milliken2014:20–21)andempiricaldatacollectedfor
thecurrentstudyatbothendsofthesupplychain432suggestthatmosthornleavesthe
Africancontinentbyplane,itsonwardjourneyfromentrepôtsdependsontheconnectedness
ofintermediaries.Kingpinsandtheirminionsthusferrythehorneithertothelocalmarket
(whichusedtobebasedinChokwe,BeiraandMaputo)433ordirectlytothebuyer’stransport
intermediarywhowouldbelocatedinMaputoorJohannesburg.434Thelatteroptionofthe
kingpinorthelocaltransportertransferringthehorntothebuyer,orthetranscontinental
transportintermediary,isthepreferredchoiceasitisfastandefficient.Whiletheprevious
432AccordingtointerdictiondataofVietnam’sCITESScientificAuthorityprovidedin2013(personalcommunication,2013),allinterdictionsinvolvingrhinohornhadoccurredatthetwomaininternationalairportsinHoChiMinhCityandHanoi,exceptforoneinterdictionalongamajorhighwayin2004.433AcuriousadaptionwastheuseofwhiteMozambicansofPortugueseextractiontotransporthornfromMassingirtoMaputo.Theserunnerssupposedlycarryanauraofprivilegeandstatus,whichallowsthemtonavigatethroughroadblockswithoutbeingstoppedorsearched(Interviewswithintelligenceofficers,2013).434RhinohornhasalsobeensmuggledviaCapeTownInternationalAirportoutofthecountry.PoliceandintelligencedatasuggeststheuseoftheinternationalairportsinManzini,SwazilandandMaseru,Lesotho.Duetotheinvolvementofseveralcommercialpilotsinrhinopoachingsyndicates,organizedcrimeinvestigatorsbelievethatorganizedtraffickinggroupsusesmalllightairplanesandtransportrhinohorntoneighbouringcountriesfromthemanyunregisteredlandingstripssprinkledacrossSouthAfrica.
336
chapterpointedtocomplexsystemsandrelationshipsinvolvingwildlifeprofessionalsand
organizedcrimegroupsinvolvedingraychannelling,illegalpoachingintheKNPhasallowed
criminalactorstopursuedecentralized,straightforwardanddirectroutesduetothe
opportunitystructures(discussedabove)presentedbyMozambiqueborderingthePark.The
simplest,mostdirectandefficientroutefromtheKNPtotheinternationaltranshipmentpoint
wasalsothemostsecureandhasbeentriedandtestedbyorganizedcrimegroupsinvolvedin
abouquetofcriminalmarketsforseveraldecades.
SouthAfricanauthoritieshavesuccessfullyinterceptedseveralhugeandmultiplesmaller
consignmentsofrhinohornoftensmuggledintandemwithotherprohibitedwildlifeproducts
passingthroughOliverRTamboInternationalAirport(InterviewswithSARSofficials,2013).
PrinceManyathi,amagistratepresidingovercasesofwildlifetraffickinggoingthroughthe
airportprovidesanuancedprofileofthesmugglers(quotedby:Trung/Huong2013):
“Since2008,morethan30rhinohornsmugglingcaseshavebeenseizedinJohannesburg.Duringtheperiodof2010-2012,therewere132peoplefromvariouscountriesparticipatinginandsmugglingrhinohorns,wereunderarrestinSouthAfrica,ofwhichVietnamesenationalsaccountedformostofthedetainees.Onaverage,every10detectedcases,therewouldbe9casesconductedbyVietnamesepeople,andtheotheronehastheinvolvementofVietnamesenationals.MostofthedetaineesadmitinthecourtthattheycanreceiveUSD8,000forapairofrhinohorn,smugglerscanhaveUSD15,000totakethemouttheSouthAfrica,butthereisnospecificamountforthepaymentbythefinalconsumer”…[...]…4monthsago,wedetained2Vietnamesestudentssmugglingrhinohorns,eachofthemcarried10horns.Inthecourt,theyadmittedthattheywerehiredtotransportasealedpackagethattheydidnotknowwhatwasinside.Thecourtfoundtheywereguiltyandsentencedthemwithamonetarypunishmentof1millionRand(aboutUSD90,000)foreachofthem.Theypaidtheamountrightaway.Thisistoconfirmthatthereissurelyaverystrongorganizationbackingthemup,willingtopayincashforthetransportersiftheyareunderarrest.Mostofthehiredtransportersofrhinohornsarepoororarehavingfinancialdifficulty.”
WildlifetraffickingnetworkswereusingVietnamesestudentsenrolledatSouthAfrican
universitiesandtechnikons435ashorncouriersuponreturningtotheirhomecountryforTet
435Theterm‘technikon’referstoatechnicalandvocationaltrainingcollegeinSouthAfrica.
337
celebrations436andotherholidays(Interviewwithorganizedcrimeinvestigator,2013).There
werealsocaseswheretraffickingnetworksrecruitedpeopleinHanoiandotherVietnamese
citiestocollecta‘package’inSouthAfrica.Theywouldflytothecountry,collecttheparcelat
theairportandflyoutthesameornextday(pers.communicationwithJulianRademeyer,
2016).Similartodrugtraffickingnetworks,theprofileofcouriersandthepointofdeparture
andarrivalarehighlyadaptable.Decoysareusedtodistractlawenforcementofficials(see
nextchapter).Accordingtolawenforcementsources(Interviews,2013and2014),
VietnamesenationalshavebeensmugglingrhinohornfromotherairportsinsouthernAfrica,
withtheinternationalairportsinNairobiandMaputofrequentlyfeaturingastranshipment
nodes.AirlineswithdirectorindirectflightstoVietnamandotherSoutheastAsiandestination
suchasBangkokandHongKongarepreferred.Europeanairportsalsoserveastransithubs
(An2015).AfricantranscontinentalsmugglersareararitybecauseAsianlawenforcement
agentsarereputedtoscreenpeopletravelingonsouthernAfricanpassports(Interviewsin
HongKongandVietnam,2013).
WhilerhinohornisstilltransitingthroughORTambo,MaputoInternationalAirporthas
becometheairportofchoicefororganizedcrimegroupsasstafffromthehigherechelonsof
airportmanagementthroughtocustomsandcleaningstaffhaveareputationforassisting
withthesafepassageofcontrabandagainstasmallfee.Thisassessmentcorrespondswiththe
observationofanairportexecutivebasedatMaputoInternationalAirport,whostatedthat
wildlifecontrabandwasonlydetectedandconfiscatedwhentherelevantgatekeepershad
notreceivedtheirbribe.Theymayalsobeunhappywiththeamountpaid,orthehornswere
“supposed”tobeconfiscatedasatokenofpoliticalwill(Interview,Maputo,2013).
Competitionbetweendifferentwildlifetraffickinggroupsincreasesasrhinohorntravelsalong
theillegalflow.Accordingtoahornsmuggler(Interview,2013),severalmajorseizuresin
Asiantranshipmenthubsweretheresultoftip-offsbycompetingorganizedwildlifetrafficking
groups:
“Yesitwascompetition.IunderstandChineseandthewayIseethemoperate.Theywanttoprovetooneanotherwho'sthebiggest,whoisthegreatest.IfIammorethan
436Tet,the“FeastoftheFirstMorningoftheFirstDay”referstoVietnameseNewYear.ThedateofthemostimportantculturaleventinVietnamcoincideswiththeChineseNewYear,withthedateusuallyfallingbetweenJanuaryandFebruary.
338
you,Ihavetooppressyou.Youcan’tdoanything.Theymakeitlikeamafia-way,youunderstand.Theylikeitthisway,thesekingpins.Becausetheinformationwasspot-on.Itwasexact.”
Rhinohornisalsosmuggledon-boardofshippingvessels,concealedinsidecontainerscarrying
avarietyofnaturalresourcesfromsouthernandEastAfricanportcitiesincludingCapeTown,
Durban,Beira,MombassaandDaresSalaam.Smugglersremarkedthatairtravelwasthe
preferredmodeoftransportationduetotimeandefficiencyconcerns.
ThepreviouschaptertouchedontheroleofVietnameseembassystaffintheprocurement
andtransportationofrhinohornfromthesourcetotheirhomecountry.437Thedubiousrole
ofembassystaffcameinitiallyunderthespotlightafterenvironmentaljournalistsfilmedthe
embassy’sformerfirstsecretaryreceivingrhinohornsfromaknowntraffickeronthestreet
outsidetheVietnameseembassyinPretoriain2008(50/502008).438SouthAfricanpolice
officersalsofoundevidencethattheformereconomicattachéwasusinghisdiplomatic
immunitytotransportandsmugglerhinohornsindiplomaticvehiclesandbags(Rademeyer
2012:257).ApoliticalcounsellorattheembassyandthedeputyheadoftheVietnamese
‘GovernmentOffice’wereequallyimplicatedinrhinohornprocurementandtransport(ibid).
Morerecently,NorthKoreandiplomatshavebeenlinkedtorhinohorntrafficking.TheSouth
Africangovernment,forexample,expelledaNorthKoreandiplomatinDecember2015.The
diplomatabusedhisdiplomaticimmunityandtheembassy’sdiplomaticpouchtosmuggle
rhinohornoutofSouthAfrica.HewasarrestedintheMozambicancapitalofMaputoinMay
2015after4.5kgofrhinohornandcloseto$100000werefoundinavehicleinwhichhewas
traveling.ThecarhaddiplomaticnumberplatesandwasregisteredtotheNorthKorean
embassyinPretoria.Thediplomatandhiscompanionweresubsequentlyreleasedonbailof
$30000andreturnedtoSouthAfrica(Rademeyer2015).439
437AninformantinVietnam(Interview,2013)equallyfoundevidencethatdiplomaticstaffattheSouthAfricanembassyinVietnamwasinvolvedinrhinohornsmuggling.ThematteriswithSouthAfricanauthorities.438VuMocAnhwasrecalledaftertheincident.Lawenforcementinvestigators(Interviews,2013)believethatshehasbeenpostedtotheVietnameseembassyinMaputo.Thiscouldnotbeindependentlyconfirmed.439JulianRademeyercompiledatimelineofNorthKoreandiplomaticinvolvementinrhinohorntraffickingthatdatesbacktothe1980s.Inhisbookon‘OperationLock’(acontroversiallawenforcementoperationtodisruptrhinohorntraffickinginthe1980s),JohnHanks(2015:104-107)arguesthatNorthKoreanembassieswerenotoriouslyunderfunded.Diplomatswereexpectedtoraisetheshortfallintheirhostcountries.HefurthersuggeststhatNorthKoreandiplomatsfinancedtheembassyintheZimbabweancapitalofHararethrough“the
339
FieldworkinVietnamrevealedthatbuyersandconsumerstrustedtheprovenanceand
authenticityofrhinohornwhenprocuredfromorviadiplomatsandgovernmentofficials(see
Chapter8onfakehorn).Disruptingillegalflowsofrhinohorn(oranyillegalsubstanceor
commodity)becomesamatterofhighpoliticsandquietdiplomacywhencriminalactorscan
claimdiplomaticimmunityfromprosecution.Byvirtueoftheirdiplomaticstatus,Vietnamese
diplomatsandtheirpouchesareuntouchableliketheMozambicankingpins.Thesmugglingof
anycontrabandthroughdiplomaticchannelsisthemostsecureflowbecauselaw
enforcementbodiesholdnojurisdictiontoopenandsearchdiplomaticpouches(compare
withtheUnitedNationsConferenceonDiplomaticIntercourseandImmunities1961:Article
27oftheViennaConventiononDiplomaticRelations).
Illegalmarketactorsconfirmedthattheriskofdetectionwashigherinsourcecountries
wheresnifferdogsandcompetentborderstaffknewhowtoidentifyrhinohornwhereaslaw
enforcementstaffintransitanddestinationcountrieshavenotbeensufficientlytrainedto
identifyillegalwildlifecontraband(comparewithSellar2014a;Sellar2014b).Similartothe
graychannelsdescribedinthepreviouschapter,theshorterthesupplychain(thefewer
segmentsornodalpoints),thefasterandmoresecuretheflow.Whilegraychannelling
involvesmoresegmentsandactorsinthesupplychainasaprecautionarysecuritymeasure,
actorsinvolvedinthisillegalflowcommentedontheirpreferenceforshortersupplychains
withafew“triedandtested”intermediarieswhoarenonethelessswappeddependingonthe
finaldestinationofthehornandthemodeoftransportation.Afewstrategicactorssuchas
governmentofficialsandlawenforcementagentsreceiveregularpaymentsto“clearthe
coast”(Interviews,2013).Theintermediaryandtransportrolesarehenceofparticular
significanceinshortflowsasanywrongmovecouldleadtodetectionordefection.
Existingliteraturesuggeststhatcriminalnetworksfaceanefficiency/securitytrade-offand
securityconcernsappeartoreignsupremeinoperationaldecision-making
purchase,smugglingandresaleofrhinohorn(Hanks2015:104).”Theembassyhadbeenopenedin1981,andconsecutivecouncilorsandembassystaffwereallegedlyusingtheirdiplomaticprivilegestosmugglerhinohornoutofthecountry.TheformerheadofWWF-SouthAfricastatesthat“irrefutableevidenceduringanumberofstingoperations”wasmadeavailabletoZimbabweanministers(Hanks2015:105).TheZimbabwepoliceandconservationagencieswereallegedlyinstructedtoleavetheembassystaffaloneintheearly1990s(ibid).TheNorthKoreanembassyinHarareclosedinthelate1990s.
340
(Morselli/Giguère/Petit2007;Lindelauf/Borm/Hamers2009).Trustandsecrecyarethetwo
bindingmechanismsthatensureandfacilitatecollaborationbetweennetworkmembersand
enableflows(Morselli/Giguère/Petit2007:144).Empiricalevidencecollectedforthisproject
suggeststheneedforamorenuancedinterpretationwhenitcomestoillegalrhinohorn
supplychains.Whilesecurityconcernsappeartoplayastructuringroleingrayflowsofrhino
horn,theyappearsecondarytoefficiencyandqualitycontrolconcernsinillegalflows.Whyis
thisthecase?WhenseenthroughaSouthAfricanorinternationallens,theillegalhuntingand
killingofrhinos,thedehorningandsubsequentsmugglingofrhinohornfromthebush
throughtotransithubsandthefinalconsumermarketsconstituteanunambiguousillegal
flow.Actorsdonotbendtherulesorexploitloopholesinthisinstance;theybreakthe‘lawof
theland’onseveralcounts.Thisincludes,butisnotlimitedto,trespassinginaprotected
area,huntingwithoutapermit,illegalhuntingofrhinos(andcalves),illegalpossessionof
rhinohorn,illegalpossessionoffirearmsandammunition,dealinginrhinohorn,theft,illegal
immigration,racketeeringandmoneylaundering(Interviewwithprosecutors1and2,2013).
Illegalmarketactorsandmarketdisruptors(lawenforcementandgovernmentofficials)cited
theillegitimacyofthehuntingandrhinohorntradebanandthevaluationofrhinohornasa
legitimatetradablecommodityaslegitimationdevicesfortheirillegalactivities.Likeother
importantactorsintheoverallmarketstructure,theseactorsinvokethenotionofcontested
illegality.Thecrimeofrhinopoachingandrhinohorntraffickingwasinterpretedinaless
seriouslightthancrimesthataffectedthecommunityorfellowhumanbeingsdirectly.
Poachersandkingpinsappeartousethisformofreasoningtobypasslawenforcement,and
theyfeelsecureanduntouchableontheirhometurf.Moreover,afewmarketdisruptors
wereco-optedintopoachinggroupsorstartedtheirownhuntingcrews(severalrangersfrom
theKNPandLNPruntheirownhuntingteams–seesectiononcooperation).The
participationofsocialcontrolagentsinpoachinggroupsdoesnotonlysecuretheflowof
rhinohorn,butitalsolegitimizesthecriminalactivitiesassociatedwithobtainingand
traffickingofrhinohorn.Theargumentgoesthatifamemberofthepolitical,economicor
socialeliteisinvolvedintheflow,thenitcannotbeagainstthelaw(Interviews,2013).Their
participationmayrendertheflowmoresecure,butthisdoesnotequatetothecoordination
problemofsecuritybeinglessofconcern.
341
SeenfromaMozambicanperspective,rhinopoachingwasnotspecifiedasacriminaloffence
intheMozambicancriminalcodeuntilApril2014.AccordingtoPortuguesecoloniallaws,
poachingofwildlifewasindeedaminortransgressioninMozambiqueobtainingdiscretionary
fines,exceptfortheoccasionalheavy-handedactionagainstvillagerssuspectedof
subsistencepoachinginnationalparks(Witter2013).Rhinokingpins(Interviewsin
Mozambique,2013)justifiedillegalhuntingbystatingthatrhinopoachingwasnotevena
crimeinMozambique(atthetime).Moreover,huntingofwildanimalswasariteofpassage
foryoungboysgrowingupinvillages,andboysandmenhadbeenhuntingintheformer
Coutada16(nowdesignatedastheLNP)formanygenerations.Poachers(Interviews,2013)
referredtothedouble-edgedmoralityofallowing“whitemen”tohuntrhinolegallywhilethe
“blackman”isguiltyofacriminaloffenceandstigmatizedasa“poacher”becausehecannot
affordthepricingofcommercialsportshunting.
Graph7:Mozambicanarrest,rifleconfiscationandfinesdata,2011-2013
Source:ReportonRhinoceroses,CITESSecretariat(CITESSecretariat2014:8)
TheMozambicanparliamentpassedtheConservationAreasAct(RepublicofMozambique
2013)inApril2014,whichprovidesforcustodialsentencesofbetweeneightandtwelveyears
forindividualswhokillanyprotectedspecieswithoutalicenseorusebannedfishinggear
suchasexplosivesortoxicsubstances.TheActalsopenalizesindividualsfoundusingillegal
firearmsorsnareswithaprisonsentenceofuptotwoyears.Anyonefoundguiltyoftheillegal
exploitation,storage,transportorsaleofprotectedspecieswillbefinedbetween50and1000
timestheminimummonthlynationalwagepaidtopublicofficials(CITESSecretariat2014:8–
342
9).440Rhinopoachingandthetraffickingandpossessionofrhinohornthuswerecriminalized
inMozambiqueinApril2014.However,thecountry’slegislationiscurrentlybeingrevisedto
imposestifferpenaltiesfortraffickers.Atthisstage,smugglersusuallyreceiveafinewhereas
poachersgetjailtime.Implementation,diffusionandcomplianceofthenewlawhasto
involvetrainingandcapacitybuildingoflawenforcementandjudicialofficers,aswellas
awarenessraisingandeducationamongstthoseconstituenciesaffectedbythenewlaw.
Asshowninthegraphabove(Graph7),therehasbeenasteadyincreaseinarrests,rifle
confiscationsandfinesissuedbetween2011and2013.Theproofisinthepudding:Those
arrestedareoftenreleasedwithinafewhours(Interviewwithpoachingkingpins1and2,
Massingir,2013),riflesfindtheirwaybackintocirculationandonlyasmallpercentageoffines
arepaid.
7.8Conclusion
Thischapterhasdealtwithstructuresandprocesseslinkedtothegreatestsourceofrhino
horn,theillegalhuntingofrhinosinSouthAfricanconservationareas.Whilethisformofhorn
‘production’constitutesanillegalflowfromthebushtothemarket,itisconnectedtogray
channelling(Chapter6)assomeofthesameintermediaries,transportersandroutesareused.
Thischapteralsodemonstratesthehistoricallock-inlinkedtoconservationparadigms,which
rendersdisruptionoftheseflowsadifficultifnotimpossibleundertaking.Theincreasing
militarizationofanti-poachingoperationsiscontributingtothefurtheralienationoflocal
communities,whichunderdifferentcircumstances,couldactasthefirstlineofdefence
againstrhinopoaching.Actorsinthisflowhavemasteredthecoordinationproblemsof
competition,cooperationandsecurity.
440ThisamountstoUS$4425andUS$88500atthecurrentexchangerateinNovember2014.
343
Chapter8:Fakerhinohorn:Trustandtheissueofqualitycontrol
“Youcanfeelit;youcanseeitifyoureyesareopen.Normally,especiallywhenyou'reAfrican,youwillknow.Youknowtherearesomepeopleherethatdon'tknowaboutrhinos,they'vejustheardaboutrhinos.They'veneverseentherhino.Maybeonlyinthezoo(Interviewwithconvictedpoacher16,2013).”
8.1Introduction
Chapter3focusedonthedemandandvaluationofrhinohorn.Aparallelmarketforfake
rhinohornhasexistedeversincerhinohornbecameahigh-endtradablegoodseveral
millenniaago.Theissueoffakehornisrelevanttotheoverallmarketstructureduetoits
incidencealongtheentiresupplychainanditsimplicationforvaluation.Thenormative
perceptionsofregulatorsandillegalmarketactorsregardingthelegalityoffakeor‘Ersatz’441
horn,forexample,providefascinatinginsightsonthevaluationofrhinohorn.Tiedtothe
coordinationproblemofvalueistheissueofqualitycontrol.Howdomarketactorsensure
thattheydonotbuy,tradeorconsumefakerhinohorn?Thechapterbeginswiththe
differentiationofdifferenttypesoffakerhinohornbeforelookingatactorsinvolvedinthe
productionanddistributionofsuchhorns.Theresearchidentifiedtheroleoftherhinohorn
assessor,whofulfilsthefunctionofqualitycontrolandriskmitigation.
8.2LegalactorsandErsatzhorn
Bothlegitimateandcriminalactorsareinvolvedintheproductionoffakeor‘Ersatz’rhino
horn,whichdiffersregardingquality,purposeandfunctionality.Taxidermists,manufacturers
andscientistsbelongtothecategoryoflegitimatehornreplicaproducersalthoughrogue
taxidermistshavealsobeencomplicitincriminalconspiraciesinvolvingfraud,theftand
launderingoforiginalandfakerhinohorn.Taxidermistsproduceareplicaofhuntingtrophies
441TheGermanword“Ersatz”hasbecomeususforsubstitutehorns.
344
andrhinohornsformuseums,galleries,zoosandprivatecollectionsinordertopreventtheft
oftheoriginalsortoreplaceoriginalsthatwerestolenpreviously(seeFigure10).The
productionofsuchhornreplicasrequiresaspecializedartisanalprocess.Taxidermistsusea
varietyofmaterialstorecreaterhinohornincludingJesmoniteacrylicresin,glassfibreor
silicone(Natural–History–Conservation.com2015).Suchhornreplicacanlooksurprisingly
authenticasagangofthievesfoundoutwhentheybrokeintotheNaturalHistoryMuseumin
theBritishcountyofHertfordshire,andstolereplicasmadeofresinfromstuffedrhinosin
2011(StaffreporterforCanberraTimes2011).
Figure10:RhinotrophywithErsatzhorn
Source:PhototakenbyJensBeckertinParis,France
Thesehigh-quality‘Ersatz’hornshavebecomeanareaofconcerntoCITESauthorities,which
foundthatthequalityoffakerhinohornsusedtodeceiveenforcementauthoritieshad
improvedmarkedly.TheCITESSecretariat(2013:6)andlawenforcementofficials(Interviews,
2013)reportedahighnumberofincidentsinvolvingprofessional,pseudoandproxyhunters
whoremovedrhinohornsfromtheirhuntingtrophiesandreplacedthemwithfakehorns
uponreturningtotheirhomecountries.Intermediarieslaundertherealhornsintotheillegal
market.Suchfakerhinohornscouldbeeasilyidentifiedinthepastastheywereshapedinto
hornmouldsusingfiberglassorplastic;however,recentsampleshavebeenmadefromhigh-
qualityresinwithamoresolidstructurethanrealhorn.Thisimprovementrendersvisual
identificationofthishorn‘Ersatz’difficult.Asaconsequence,CITESofficialsburnasmall
345
quantityofdustfromthehorn,whichshoulddeliveradistinctivesmelldependingonwhether
keratinbiomassorsyntheticmaterialsarepresent(Carnie2012).Duetothereplacementof
realhornanditslaunderingintoillegaltradeflows,theCITESSecretariathascalledon
membercountriestoimplementadequatelegislationandenforcementcontrolstoprevent
hornsoflegallyobtainedhuntingtrophiesfromenteringillegaltradeflows,andtoensurethat
thetrophies“remaininthepossessionoftheirownersforthepurposeindicatedintheCITES
exportpermit”(CITESSecretariat2013:6).Thequalityandauthenticityofreplicahornsare
hencedependentonthetrophyowner’srationaleforreplacingthehornwithareplica.It
couldbeasafetyprecautiontoaverttheft.Dependingonwhethercloseorcorruptibletiesto
publicofficialsareinplace,themountingofcheapplasticreplicamaybesufficienttokeepup
asemblanceoflegality.Thisfaçademayalsoapplytoscenarioswherethechancesofatrophy
auditareunlikely.442
Inthehopeofmanufacturingafacsimilerhinohornthatcouldactasaviablesubstitutefor
theoriginalmaterial,443severalteamsofscientistsandengineersareintheprocessof
“bioengineering”syntheticrhinohorn(Zak2015;Aulakh2015),attemptingto“clone”rhinos
andrhinohorn(SullivanBrennan2014;Speart1994),orinvestigatingthepotentialfor
growingrhinohorninvitro(Yang2011:8).444Sincerhinohornwasstruckofthelistoff
permissibleingredientsintheChinesepharmacopeiain1993,governmentandtraditional
medicineauthoritieshaveencouragedthesubstitutionofrhinohornwiththehornofwater
buffalo,saigaantelope,cattleandyaktoachievesimilarresults.Such‘Ersatz’hornsare
legitimate,viableandmoreaffordablethanrhinohorn;offeringthemasthe‘realdeal’
constitutes,however,fraudanddeception(Nowell2012a:2).Theproposedsubstitutionof
442In2014,SouthAfricaninvestigativejournalistSimonBloch(personalcommunication,2015)contactedtheCITESmanagementauthorityinPolandtoverifywhetherPolishauthoritiesweremonitoringtheinfluxofhuntingtrophiesfromSouthAfrica.AfteraCzech-Vietnamesetraffickingnetworkwasbusted,suspicionsarerifethatPolishhunterswerealsocollaboratingwithAsianwildlifetradingnetworks.BlochwastoldthatthePolishauthoritieswere“struggling”todocheckup’sonPolishtrophyhuntersduetocountry’sprivacylaws.443ConservationNGOssuchastheWWFcontestthelegitimacyofproducinglegalhornsubstitutestopreventpoaching.SaysWWFwildlifetradeexpertColmanO’Criodain(quotedinAulakh2015):
"ThereisalreadyahugequantityoffakehornincirculationinVietnambutthatisn'tdentingthepoachinglevels.Ingeneral,wefavourtryingtochangeconsumerbehaviourratherthanpanderingtoit.Thatiswherewearecurrentlydirectingourefforts."
444Chapter3discussesthechemicalcompositionofrhinohorninmoredetail.
346
rhinohornwiththehornofotheranimalsmayhaveledtosomeunintendednearcataclysmic
consequencesforthesaigaantelope(comparewithChapter3).Inthe1980s,theWWF
suggestedtheuseofsaigahornasaviablealternativetorhinohorn.SaysaWWFofficial
(personalcommunication,2014):
“…yesitistruethatinthe1980s,whilesaigawasstillcommonandillegalhuntingwasn'taproblem,wedidtoutitasanalternative.ThatwasbeforethecollapseoftheSovietUnion,whichledtotheexplosioninpoachingthatcausedpopulationcrashes.”
SaigahornisusedalmostexclusivelyinTCM.WildlifemonitoringnetworkTRAFFIC
corroboratesthatthepriceforsaigahornshasincreasedsignificantlysincethemid–1990s
(vonMeibometal.2010:34).Highlyorganizedpoachinggangspushedtheformerlyabundant
populationsoftheAsianantelopetypicallyfoundinthesteppesofKazakhstan,Uzbekistan
andtheRussianFederationintoastateofsignificantpopulationdeclinethroughillegal
hunting.445Chinaisthelargestimporterandconsumerofsaigahorn,followedbySingapore
andJapanwithSingapore,HongKongandMalaysiaasimportanttradeentrepôts(von
Meibometal.2010:V).ATRAFFICresearchprojectseeking,amongstothers,alternativesto
theuseofsaigahorninTCMfoundthatfewTCMtraders446recommendedrhinohornasa
viablesubstituteforsaigahorn(vonMeibometal.2010:27);inotherwords,thecorollaryof
replacingsaigawithrhinohornwasnotendorsedorrecommendedtotheTRAFFIC
researchers.
TheofficialChinesepharmacopeiarecommendstheuseofwaterbuffaloinlieuofrhinohorn
(Nowell2012a:33),andthisappearstohavehadnoimpactonwaterbuffalopopulationsin
Asia.Thissubstitutionisnotentirelyunproblematicasrhinohornisperceivedasasuperior
healthtonicandcoolingmedicinetosomepractitionersandtheirpatients.Asatraditional
doctorinHongKongdisclosed(Interview,2013):
445Thenumberofsaigaantelopesdecreasedfromapproximately1250000animalsinthemid–1970stolessthan60000antelopesby2010(vonMeibometal.2010:33).Becausemalesaigaantelopesfashionthecovetedhornsonly,thesexratioofpopulationsissignificantlyskewedtothepointwhereroughly7%ofpopulationsareadultmales(vonMeibometal.2010:33).446Fivestaffmembersoutofasampleof52TCMshopssuggestedreplacingsaigahornwithrhinohorn(whichwasdeemedimpossibletoobtain)inMalaysia.TCMtradersinSingaporeandChinadidnotrecommendrhinohornasErsatzhornforsaigahorn(vonMeibometal.2010).
347
“Intraditionalmedicinetherhinohornisveryimportantandthemedicaleffectisverygood.Ifweusethebuffalotoreplacetherhinohorn,wewilluse10or20timesmore.Itishardtoreplaceit.Whenweboilthemedicine,wewilluselotsofbigpiecesofbuffaloanditisinconvenient.ThemedicaleffectmaybenotverygoodsosomepeopleinChinastillusetherhinohornillegally.”
8.3CriminalactorsandfakeorErsatzhorn
Whilelaw-abidingdoctorsandpatientschoosewaterbuffalo,otherhorn‘Ersatz’andherbal
tinctures,gullibleTCMtraders,doctorsandconsumershavefallenvictimtofraudsterswho
peddlewaterbuffaloandhornreplicaasifitwererealrhinohornwiththeconcomitant
pricingofbetweenUS$25000toUS$45000perkilogramofrhinohorn.447Roughlybetween
70to90%448of“rhinohorn”purchasedfrommarkets,traditionalapothecaries,andmedical
practicesoron-lineisbelievedtobeeitherfakeorahornsubstituteinVietnam(Instituteof
EcologyandBiologicalResourcesquotedin:Anonymous2013,Interviewwithconservation
geneticist,Hanoi,2013;Nowell2012a;Amman2013b;Kvinta2014).WhileVietnamese
nationalsarelargelyunfamiliarwiththe‘lookandfeel’ofrhinohorn(Interviewwith
representativeofTCMauthority,HCMC,2013),449waterbuffaloisdistinctiveandrecognizable
duetoitsconcentric-shapedfibresanditsdistinctyellowishcolourwithawhitecorewhereas
rhinohornconsistsofkeratintubulesandisdarkbrown.Thetipofthewaterbuffalohornis
solidbutitbecomeshollowtowardstheend–unlikerhinohorn,whichissolidthroughout.
Duetothefamiliarityoflocalswithwaterbuffalohorn,thehornisblackenedand“rhinofied”447AtthetimeofmyfieldworkinSoutheastAsia,TCMtraders,doctorsandconsumerspaidbetweenUS$25000toUS$45000perkilogramofrhinohorn.Assmallamountsofhornwererequiredformedicinalpurposes,rhinohornwasdispensedindisksorpowder-form,renderingitsidentificationtricky.ThepriceofAfrican‘rhinohorn’waslowerthanAsianrhinohorn,whichisbelievedtobemorepotentthantheAfricanvariant.448TheoverallmarketshareoffakeandErsatzhorninVietnamisdifficulttoassess.Vietnamesegovernmentauthorities(Interviews,2013)tendtostressthehighincidenceoffakehorninordertodeflectfrominternationaldatasuggestingthatVietnamisthemainconsumerof‘real’rhinohorn(Milliken/Shaw2012;Rademeyer2012).DrCindyHarperfromtheVeterinaryGeneticsLaboratoryattheUniversityofPretoriatestedsamplescollectedfrommarketsandtradersinVietnam.InvestigativejournalistKarlAmmanandhisteamhadcollectedthe30samplesfromTCMoutlets.90%werefakes.AVietnameseconservationgeneticistwhotestsrhinohornonbehalfoflawenforcementauthoritiespeggedthemarketshareoffakeandersatzhornat70%.HebasedtheassessmentontheDNAanalysisof300hornsamplescollectedbetween2003and2013(Interview,Hanoi,2013).449PoacherskilledanddehornedthelastJavanrhinoinVietnam’sCatBaNationalParkin2010.
348
(madetolooksimilartoAsianrhinohorn)todeceiveprospectivebuyers.Criminalsalso
peddlethehornofAfricanoxconsideredasuperior‘Ersatz’asitisanunknownentityin
Vietnam.ThetipandcolourofcattlehornlooksurprisinglysimilartoAfricanrhinohorn
(InterviewsinHanoiandHCMC,2013).Thesearchforanever-improvedversionoffakerhino
hornhasledcriminalentrepreneurstoinvestinhighlysophisticatedhornforgeryequipment
andtosetupfakehornmanufactories.450Accordingtotheheadofmolecularsystematicand
conservationgeneticsattheInstituteforScienceandTechnologyinHanoi,thesophistication
ofcounterfeitingtechnologieshasimprovedtosuchadegreethatonlyexpertscandistinguish
realfromfakerhinohorn(InterviewinHanoi,2013).Professionalfraudstershavemastered
theartoffakingrhinohornbyusinghumanandanimalhairtogetthedistinctivesmellof
burntkeratin,shouldtheabove-mentionedtestofburninghorndustbeemployedtoverify
theauthenticityofthehorninquestion.Imitationhornis‘cloned’tonearperfection
mimickingthenaturalcharacteristicsofhornsuchascolour,odour,hair,density,hardness,
contoursandtheunevennaturalgroovesalongthesurfaceofthehorn(InterviewsinHanoi,
HCMCandJohannesburg,2013).Thosecheatedhavenorecoursetothelawasitisnotonly
illegaltosellbutalsotobuyrhinohorninVietnam,HongKongandChina.451
CuriouslyitisnotonlyunsuspectinghornconsumersinVietnamorChinathatbuytainted
hornbutthereareothersthatknowinglyandwillinglybuyErsatzhorn.Whilecommon-
varietiestypeoffakehorncanbeprocuredforaslittleasUS$200inVietnam,sophisticated
typesofErsatzhorncomeatapriceandareessentiallyvaluedasa“second-best”alternative
orascrediblereplicaoftherealthingwithassociatedfunctions.Consciousbuyersof
“superior”replicaorErsatzhornpayuptoUS$10000perhorn(Interviewswithsmugglers
andintermediaries,2013).Inanattempttoimpresstheirpeers,aspiranthornconsumersbuy
fakehornbecausetheycannotaffordrealhorn.AninformantinHanoiexplains(Interview
450KarlAmman(2012:36)hascollectedfilmfootageofafactorywherethetipsofwaterbuffaloarereshapedandpolishedtolooklikerhinohorn.DatacollectedinHanoiunveiledsmallfactoriesthatwereconvertinghumanandanimalhairaswellasfurintofakerhinohorn.451Thefocusofthisresearchwasinthesethreecountriesduringdatacollection.Thetransnational/internationaltradeanduseofrhinohornisinprincipleillegalinallCITESmembercountries;however,internationalregulationsanddeterminationsconcerningthebanandauthorizedusehavenotbeendomesticatedinalljurisdictions.
349
withrhinoscientist2,2013):“Somepeoplewanttobuyandkeepthehorneven,whenthey
knowitsfakeathomefordecoration.”
Wealthybusinessentrepreneursandpoliticians,ontheotherhand,buyfakehorntoprotect
theirinvestment.ThefakeorErsatzhornisshow-casedinlieuofrealhorn(similartothe
ErsatzhornemployedinmuseumsandcollectionsinEurope,NorthAmericaandsouthern
Africa),whichisstowedinasafelocation.Whileshowingoffone’swealthandstatusis
integraltoconspicuousconsumption,itwouldbe“stupid”nottoprotectone’s“very
expensiveinvestmentandgrowingasset”(Interviewswithintermediariesandconsumers,
HanoiandJohannesburg,2013).Theneedtoprotectrhinohornisnotonlylinkedtoitshigh
valuebuttotherealthreatoftheft(theftofrhinohorniswidespreadacrosstheworld).This
becameapparentafterthevicepresidentofSarcombankhadarhinohornvaluedatan
estimated4billionVietnameseDong(134530€)stolenfromhismansionintheMekongDelta
(StaffreporterforThanhnienNews2012).452
8.4Trust,qualitycontrolandtheroleofthehornassessorDuetothehighincidenceoffakehorn,criminalactors,tradersandconsumersemploya
numberofmeasurestoensuretheauthenticityoftheiracquisition.Criminalgroupsinvolved
inshamorillegalhuntingexpeditionsensurethatatrustedallysuchasthehornorganizeror
smugglingintermediaryattendsthehuntorreceivesthehornimmediatelyafterthehunt,
withoutthepreciousgoodchanginghandsintheinterim.Bybeingpresentduringthehunt
andthesubsequentdehorningoftheanimal,rhinotraffickingintermediariesand/ortheAsian
associatesensurethequalityandtheprovenanceofthehorn,therebyresolvingthe
coordinationproblemsofvaluation,cooperationandsecurity.Thismechanismisanimportant
aspectofvaluationofrhinohornwhenitlandsinAsia.Smugglingintermediarieswho
coordinatebothlegalandillegalflowsofrhinohornensurethatthehorndispatchedatthe
pointoforiginisthesameastheonethatarrivesontheotherside.Thesesmuggling
452ThecaseisofTramBeisalsoofinterestasthebankerwasguiltyofcontraveningCITESrules,namelytheillegalpossessionofrhinohorn.TherhinotrophywasregisteredtoaVietnamesetrophyhunterwhohadlegallyhuntedtherhinoinSouthAfricaandgavethehorntoBeasagift(StaffreporterforThanhnienNews2012).Thegiftingoftrophyhornwasnotacriminaloffenceatthetime.
350
intermediariesarecloselyconnectedbywayofcommunicationdevicessuchasmobilephones
orinstantmessagingonelectronicdevices,orthehornismarkedwithconcealedsignsonly
knowntotheintermediaries.Thereceiverwouldthusknowwhethertheoriginalhornhas
beentampered(Interviewswithintermediaries,2013).Ofsignificanceisthechosenroute,
modeoftransport,thelengthoftheflow(howmanysegmentsorintermediariesare
involved),andwhoreceivesthehornontheotherside.Theshorterandmoredirectthe
route,thelessertheriskoftamperingwiththeexpensiveillicitcommodity.Shoulddiplomats,
lawenforcement,customs,portorconservationofficialsbeinvolvedinthetransportationor
facilitationthereof,thentheriskofdefectionisreducedastheperson’spositionorstatus
holdsswayand“opensdoors”(Interviewswithsmugglers,2013).
Consumers,dealersandsmugglers(Interviews,2013)articulatedapreferencefortrophy
horn.Consumersanddealers,inparticular,trustedtheprovenanceofthehornifthedealer
couldprovideproofofthehuntingpermit,theCITESimportorexportpermit,oraphotoof
thesupposedtrophyhunt.Thiscorrespondswiththepreferenceforwildratherthanfarmed
rhinohorn.Whenrhinohornwasemployedformedicinalpurposes,consumersanddoctors
alikesuggestedthathornfromwildrhinoswasmorepotent453thanthatoffarmedanimals.
Huntingpermits,photosandotherofficiallookingdocumentation,ofcourse,canbefalsified.
Ifthedealerhasapermanentaddresssuchasashop,stallorresidencefromwhereshe
trades,thenconsumerstrustsuchdealersandtheirproductmorereadily(Interviewwith
Chineseintermediaryandconsumers,2013).Agoodreputationiscultivatedovertimeand
withsufficientexposuretotherightclientele,whichaccentuatestheimportanceof
reputationandtrustinresolvingthecoordinationproblemofcooperationandsecurityin
illegalmarkets.Wordofmouthadvertisingthroughsocialnetworksallowscredibleand
trustworthyhorndealerstostayinbusiness(InterviewwithChinesesmuggler,2013).Similar
tothedrugtrade,thereputationofthedealerrisesorfallswithhisorherlastdeal.Moreover,
“scoring”rhinohorn454involvesapatternofinteractionssimilartothatofastereotypicaldrug
453Thepreferenceforwildrhinosislinkedtothebeliefthatthecurativeandespeciallydetoxifyingpropertiesofrhinohornarelinkedtotherhino’sdietofpoisonousplants,thornsandbramblesinAsia(Interviews,2013).Thepreferenceforwildoverfarmedanimalproductsisnotspecifictotherhinomarket.Researchelsewherehasshownapreferenceforbearbileandtigerbonefromwildpopulations(EconomistsatLarge2013:11).454Itisimportanttodifferentiatebetweentheprocessofactivelyseekingtoprocureorobtainrhinohornasopposedtotheprocessofreceivingrhinohornasagift(thenotionofgift-givingisexploredinmoredetailin
351
dealinvolvingwealthydrugusersfromtheupperstrataofsociety.Rhinohorncannotbe
procuredontheopenmarket,especiallybyunknownentities(comparewithsectionon‘Fake
hornproductionandqualitycontrolatsource’).Onlylawenforcementofficials,journalistsor
touristswouldattempttobuyhornfromrandompeoplethattheyhaveostensiblyprofiledas
possiblehorndealers(Interviews,2013).Atrustedmemberofone’ssocialnetwork(suchasa
familymember,friend,colleagueorlawenforcementofficial)introducesanaspirantbuyerto
thedealer.Thedealeremploysanumberofsafetyprecautionstominimizesecurityrisks(e.g.
thepersonresponsibleforthereferralhastoactasa‘go-between’orbufferbetweenbuyer
anddealer)anddefection(suchasadvancepayment).
Dealersprefertoenterintobusinessarrangementswithindividualswhomtheytrusttopay
theaskingpricefortherightamountorquantityofhorn–thepreferenceistosellwhole
hornsorlargequantitiesofhornasopposedtogramsorpiecesofhorn(Interviewswith
intermediaries,2013).Thehornisusuallypre-ordered,andasdescribedelsewhere,theprice
ofthehorniscontingentonitsweight,whichisusuallynotavailableatthetimeofordering.
Immediateavailabilityandlowpricesareviewedwithsuspicion;inotherwords,thereshould
beawaitingperiodtoallowthesellertosourcethehornandthepricehastobepegged
accordingtotheknownstreetvalue(Van/Tap2008:7,Interviewswithconsumers,2013).The
dealorexchangedoesnothappeninabackalleyor‘badpartoftown’butatthebuyer’s,
referentordealer’sresidenceorworkplace(Interviewswithconsumersandintermediaries,
2013).Thelocationofthedealservesthefunctionofnormalizingthetransactionasit
happensinrespectfulsurroundingssuchastheprivateorpublicsphereofthetransacting
parties.Italsoprovidesanotherlayerofsecurity455andlegitimizesthedealasabusiness
transactionthatcanbesafelyandlegitimatelydonefromone’splaceofresidenceorwork.
Thissuggeststhatmarketparticipantsarenotconcernedaboutthepotentialfall-out,stigma
Chapter3).Theformeractionassumesagencyonthepartoftheactorwhereasthelatterreferstoanactofgivingwheretherecipientisassumedtobeapassiveactorunlessheorsheweretorejectthegift.Inthisinstance,theactormovesfrombeingapassiverecipienttoassumingagencyandcontrolovertheexchange.455Illegalbusinesstransactions(includingdrugdeals)arecommonlybelievedtotakeplaceatlocationsthatappeartoguaranteetheanonymityofthemarketparticipantssuchashotelrooms,restaurants,andbusyorisolatedpublicspaces.Thecorollarysuggeststhatthedividinglinesbetweenpublicandprivatelivesandworkandleisureareblurred.Thisprovidesafurtherlayeroflegitimacytothehorntradeasmarketparticipantsallowthelinesofdivisiontobebroken.
352
orsocialsanctionsthatmightobtainfromdealingorconsumingrhinohornbytheirinner
circleoffamily,friendsorcolleagues,astheseactionsarenotperceivedasillegitimate.These
dealsneverthelessformpartofaninformalundergroundeconomyinbigurbancentresand
standindirectcontrasttotheopentradeofwildlifecontrabandinperipherallocations
removedfromthepryingeyesoftheinternationalcommunityandlocallawenforcement.456
Unlikedrugusers,rhinohornbuyersareusuallynotreturningcustomers.457Unlessthe
purchasedhornservesthefunctionofagift,consumersprocurehornonthebasisofneed
andaffordability.458
456Reports(Amman2012;Amman2015b)andinterviewswithrepresentativesofconservationNGOsinVietnam(Interviews,2013)suggestthatwildlifecontrabandincludingrhinohornistradedopenlyintownsandvillagesclosetoVietnam’snorth-easternborderwithChina.Iwasunabletotraveltothenorthernregionsduetotimeconstraints.However,IundertookdatacollectionandobservationsinthesouthernregionsoftheMekongDelta,wheresmugglingactivitieswererifeandlawenforcementlimited.Theopentradeofwildlifecontrabandinbordertownscorrespondswithresearchelsewhere(Nijman2010;Nijman/Shepherd2014;Nijman/Shepherd2015;EnvironmentalInvestigationAgency2015)onthelawlessnessandthrivingillegalwildlifetradeinneighbouringcountriessuchasLaos,ThailandandMyanmar.SituatedinaSpecialDevelopmentZoneandadjacenttoChina’sYunnanprovince,thetownofMongLainMyanmarhasgainednotorietyastheAsianresponsetothe“sincity”ofLasVegas(EnvironmentalInvestigationAgency2015).Thetax-freezonecatersalmostexclusivelytoChinesetouristswhoarrivetoenjoyleisurelypursuits,forbiddenorillegitimateintheirowncountrysuchasgambling,prostitutionandtheconsumptionofendangeredwildlifeproducts(EnvironmentalInvestigationAgency2015:3).AnEIAinvestigationfoundthatshavingsofrhinohornweresoldinMongLa(EnvironmentalInvestigationAgency2015:10);however,thereisahighprobabilitythattheseshavingsmightbecounterfeitorErsatzhorninlightofthefindingsofthecurrentstudy.BasedonregularsurveysofmarketsinTachilekandMongLa,NijmanandShepherd(2015:5)observe:
“ThetradeinTachilekandMongLaoccursinopenly,withprotectedwildlifeopenlydisplayedforalltosee.Largecatskinswereprominentlydisplayedandmanyofthetigerbonewinevatshadtigerskinhangingabovethem.Duringourninevisitswedidnotonceexperienceanyevidenceoflawenforcementwithrespecttoprotectedwildlife.Tradersweregenerallyfrankwhendiscussingthetradewithoutexpressingfearforprosecution.”
Thesefindingssuggestacoreversusperipherybiaswithregardstolawenforcementandsocialacceptanceofopentradeofendangeredwildlife(drugandhumantraffickingisalsorifeintheregion–astheareaispartoftheinfamousGoldenTriangleregion).Thisbiasisnotuncommon:somebordertownsandregionsoperatedifferentlyfromthelawsandnormsestablishedinthecore–theurbanpoliticalandbusinesscentresofpower,authorityandinfluence–andthestatemaydirectlyorindirectlysanctionthisstateofaffairsduetothehigheconomicreturnsandtaxes(thepreviouschapterdealswiththesuspensionoflegalrulesandregulationsinvillagesalongtheMozambicanborder,immediatelyadjacenttotheKrugerNationalPark).Thelongarmofthestateisbendable,opentomanipulationandcriminalalliancesinborderregions,whicharedifficulttopatrolduetogeographicalcharacteristics(Nijman/Shepherd2015)ortheirspecialpoliticalandeconomicstatus(EnvironmentalInvestigationAgency2015).457Thisexcludesthecategoryofinvestorswhostockpilerhinohornasagrowingassetwithhugegrowthpotential.458InhistheoryofconspicuousconsumptionVeblensuggeststhatconsumptionofvaluablegoodscorrelateswiththereputabilityof“agentlemanofleisure”(Veblen1899:123).Competitionbetween“gentlemenofleisure”mayleadtomassaccumulationofvaluablegoodstoupstageoneanother.Veblenarguesthatcompetitionextendstoarangeofgifts,feastsand“costlyentertainments”(Veblen1899:ibid).Itisthusnot
353
Peopleincertainpositionsareassumedtobeworthyoftrustandrespectbyvirtueoftheir
statusandroleinsociety,aswellastheaccess(tohornsupplies)andinfluencetheposition
confersuponthem;consumersthustrusttheprovenanceandauthenticityofrhinohornifthe
supplieriseitheralawenforcement,customsorconservationofficial,oradiplomatwith
legitimateconnectionstothesource(Interviewswithintermediaries,Johannesburgand
Massingir,2013;consumers,HanoiandHoChiMinhCity,2013).Lawenforcementand
customsofficershadeasyaccesstoconfiscatedrhinohornwhilegovernmentofficialsand
diplomatswhohadbeenpostedtoSouthAfricainthepast,orfamilymembersofdiplomats
onmissioninSouthAfricawerealsoperceivedascrediblesuppliersofrhinohornwithdirect
linkstothesourcecountry(Interviewswithconsumersandsuppliers,2013).459Aforensic
scientistinHanoisupportedthisassumption,statingthathornconfiscatedattheairportand
broughtinfortestingbythepolice,customsorCITESmanagementauthoritywasusuallythe
‘realthing’(Interview,Hanoi,2013).460Lawenforcementofficialsarealsoknowntoexercise
theirpositionofpowertoseizeillegalhornstocksthatneverenterthelegalchainofcustody
quantitybutqualityanddiversityofvaluablegoodsthatmatters.Thisassumptionisconsistentwithmyfindings:Ifoundnoempiricalevidenceintheliteratureorduringdatacollectionthathornconsumershadmultiplehornsondisplay.Thisseemstoindicatethathornfulfilsasymbolicfunctionofsignallingthatitsownerholdsacertainpositionandstatusinsociety.Inthisinstance,thequantityofrhinohornisirrelevant.However,possessionofthisvaluablegoodservesasa‘placeholder’fortheownertoasserthisorherrightfulplaceinsociety.Inessence,hornconsumersareunlikely‘returncustomers’unlesstheyarebuyinggiftsforfriendsorbusinessassociates.459Amman(2015b)madeasimilarobservationaftertalkingtoahorndealerinthenorthernpartsofNorthVietnamwhohadhishornstocksconfiscatedbymembersofthedrugenforcementunitclaimingthattheywouldpaythedealerlater.460IwasofferedandshownrhinohornonmanyoccasionsinHanoiandHoChiMinhCity.Interestinglypowderedrhinohornhadfallenoutoffavour,largelybecauseitwassodifficulttodistinguishitfromanyotherpowder.Moreover,theprimaryuseofrhinohornhadshiftedtostatus-upliftingandinvestmentpurposes.Tradersandconsumerswereofferingpieces,disksorentirehorns.TherewaslittledoubtthatAsiansampleswerefakebecausetherearesimplynotenoughAsianhornsinexistencetotradeinthe‘open’market.WithouthavingaDNAkitavailable,thechutzpahtosmugglesamplesoutofVietnamtohavethemtestedlaternorbeinganexpertinidentifyingrhinohorn,Iwouldnonethelesssupportthenotionthathornsoldontheopenmarket(i.e.inTCMorTVMapothecaries,medicinestallandwholesalers)islargelyfakeorErsatzwhereashornderivedfromsocialcontrolagentsanddiplomatsisauthentic.ThedaughterofStage4prostatecancerpatientrelatedhowherfatherobtainedaprescriptionforrhinohornfromthesamedoctorwhotreatedformerPresidentNguyenMinhTrietforprostatecancer(seealsothesectiononthecancermythinChapter3).Sheobtained50gramsofrhinohornfromatrustedsourcethatworksfortheanti-smugglingauthorityinHanoi.Sheexplained:
“Igotitfrommycustomerwhousuallystayatmyhotel.Heworksforthesmugglingdepartment.Normalpeoplecannotbuyit…Igotthegoodpricefromhimbecauseheismyregularcustomer.”
354
butarelaundereddirectlyintoillegalmarketflows(InterviewwithTCMtraderand
intermediary,2013).
Forthosewithnoprivilegedaccesstorealhornsuppliers,thefallbackoptionistoobtainan
independentassessmentofhornauthenticity.Aslaboratorytestsareexpensiveandcarrythe
riskofdetectionandhornconfiscationbylawenforcementauthorities(Interviews,HongKong
andHanoi,2013),anewrolehasemergedforpractitionersofTVMorTCMinthecitiesofHo
ChiMinhCity,Hanoiandotherurbancentres:theroleofthehornassessor.TVM/TCM
doctorsstillfulfiltheroleofprimaryhealthcareprovidersinVietnamesesociety(Drury2009).
Inadditiontoassuminganimportantroleinthehornvaluationchain,thejudgment,
sanctioningandassessmentofTCMdoctorsisvaluedintrinsicallyduetotheirstatusand
positioninsociety.Moreover,acodeofhonoursimilartowesternnotionsofdoctor-patient
privilegesobtainstotherelationshipbetweenthehornassessorandclient.Anassessorthus
wouldnotreportaclient(usuallyalsohis/herpatient)forpossessionofrhinohorntothe
authorities.Despiteitsillegalstatus,theuseofhornisdeemedalegitimatepracticeand
morallyacceptabletoabroadsectorofAsiansociety(Drury2009;Milliken/Shaw2012;
Nowell2012b),includingtheTVM/TCMdoctorsturnedhornassessorswhomingleamongthe
upperstrataofsociety.
Consumerswhoareunsureoftheprovenanceorqualityoftheofferedhorncantake
samples,disks,piecesorpowderedrhinohorntothesehornassessorstotestwhether“it’s
therealthing”.FraudulentorscamingredientsarenotuncommoninChinesemedicine.A
wholebodyofliteraturespeakstothephenomenonandassistslaypersonsbyproviding
pictorialdepictionsanddiagnostickeystodistinguishtherealfromthefake
(Nowell2012a:33).Threehornassessors(independentofeachother)invitedthisresearcher
toattendhornassessments.Whiletherewereslightnuancestotheindividualassessments,
theassessorsalltestedthecolour,smell,taste,densityandcompositionofthehorn.These
testsinvolvednoDNA-analysisormoderninstruments;instead,assessorsreliedontheirfive
sensesandauxiliarytoolsliketorchesandscales.Duetostrongsocialnetworklinksandthe
perceptionofdoingaservicetosociety,theseassessorsexpectednopaymentfortheir
services.Theassessorisrewardedgenerouslyinkind(i.e.withrhinohorn)ifthehornisfound
tobegenuine.Hornassessmentscanleadtoconflictbetweensellerandbuyer(Anh2014).
355
Thisisespeciallythecasewhensellersrealizethattheyhavefallenpreytofraudstersfurther
upthesupplychain,andtheywillnotbeabletorecouptheirmoney.
Anoticeablesideeffectofthehighincidenceoffakehornandassociatedfraudisthatfew
TCMorlife-styleconsumersarewillingtobuyprocessedpowderedhorn(exceptrhinopills–
seebelow).Potentialbuyersinsistonproofofprovenance.Incaseswherethepaperworkis
non-existentormissing(liketheabovementionedhuntingpermits),consumerswanttosee
andexaminethefullhorn,andwhenitisfinanciallyaffordabletheentirehornispurchased
(Interviews,2013).TCMdoctorscorrelatetheincreasedincidenceofillegalrhinokillingswith
thehighnumberoffakehornsinthemarket.Whereasconsumersusedtobuysmall
quantitiesofrhinohorninthepast,theyhavetodigdeeperintotheirpocketstobuyawhole
horn,whichisaformofqualitycontrolandinsurancepolicy.SaysaTCMdoctorsinHongKong
(Interview,2013):
“Onereasonthatrhinoarekilledmoreisbecausewhenpatientswanttogettherealrhinohorn,theymustgetthewholehorntoensureitisreal.Theyuseverylittle,therestofthehorniswasted….[…]…Ifweuserhinohornwejustuse3to5gramsperday.Wecan’ttakeitforalongtime,notlongerthantwoweeks.IfyoubuyinChina,youshouldgototheverybigpharmacyshop.Someofthemhavegoodcreditbecausetheyareoperatedbyverybigmedicalgroupsotheycanbetrusted.”
Whilethecitationreferstothemedicinaluseofrhinohorn,datacollectionontheAfricanand
Asiansideconfirmedamarketpreferenceforwholehornsofotherusergroupstoo.Those
seekingtoshowofftheirwealthbydisplayingrhinohorns,investorsandgift–giverspreferred
wholerhinohornstohorndisksorpowderforobviousreasons.Qualitycontrol,financialas
wellasaestheticconsiderations,explainthismarketpreference.
Theconstructionoftrustbetweendifferentactorswithinthistypeofmarketexchangeis
linkedtoanumberoffactors,ofwhichatleastoneisnecessaryforanexchangetooccur.Key
factorsincludethereputationandstatusofthedealerandwhethertheinitialintroduction
betweendealerandbuyerisachievedthroughcloseorweaksociallinks.Moreover,location
(businessorprivateresidence),timeconsiderations(speedofhorndelivery)andintegrityof
thehorn(wholehornversushornpowderordisks)areimportant,aswellasthechoreography
ofthedeal(doesitfollowexpectationsandculturalnorms?).Shouldthesefactorsfailto
356
impresstheprospectivebuyer,thefallbackoptionistoemploytheservicesofahorn
assessor.Thereputationandsocialpositionoftheassessoraredeterminingfactorswhether
hisorherrulingisaccepted.
8.5Rhinohornpills:Trustinfactory-producedmedicines
ThecitationoftheHongKong-basedTCMpractitionerintheprevioussectionmakes
referencetothetrustworthinessofChinesepharmaceuticalcorporations,461whichisa
significantobservationperseandworthyoffurtheranalysis.Similarly,otherTCMwholesalers
andsomeconsumersinferredthattheingredientsoffactory-producedmedicineswere
superior,credibleandgenuinewhereassmalltradersanddoctorshadtoimproviseor
substituteshouldaningredientbeunavailable(Interviews,2013).Trustinmedicinesthatare
pre-packaged,carryavisible(notnecessarilyknown)logoisconsistentwithconsumer
researchintocounterfeitpharmaceuticalselsewhere(comparewithHornberger2010;
Hübschle2010-2011).462
461Thebusinessconceptandapproachofmultinationalpharmaceuticalcorporations(bigpharma)areprogressivelyviewedasunsustainableinWesternsocieties(Hunter/Stephens2010).Theoperationalfocusonchronicdiseasesandmedicinesthatpromisehugeprofitmarginsisseenasmisplacedifnotinhumane.Start-upsandcorporationsareincreasinglymovingintonichemarketsinanattempttosecure“nichebusters”asopposedto“blockbustermedicines”(Dolgin2010).Asdistrustofcorporationsisgrowing(especiallyintheanti-globalizationandOccupymovements)acrossmanypartsoftheworld,segmentsofWesternsocietiesareturningtonaturalorcombinationtherapies.Theinabilitytocuremajordiseases,thehugeprofitmarginsandtheside-effectsof“blockbuster”medicationsandfailuretorollthemoutataffordablepricestopatientsintheGlobalSouthhaveinvokedcriticismandquestionsasregardsthemotifsdrivingpharmaceuticalcompanies(Barsh2001).ItwouldthusappearcounterintuitiveforAsianconsumerstotrustfactory-producedmedicationovermedicinesdispensedbyknownfamilydoctorsorpharmacists.Whenaskedaboutthisapparentdisconnect,consumersrelatedhowAsianpharmaceuticalcompaniesmanagedtocombinethe“old”withthe“new”;inotherwords,companiesweredistributingtraditionalmedicinesusingmoderntechnologiestogrowingnumbersofconsumers.TherehasbeenarenaissanceoftraditionalmedicineinlargepartsofAsiaincludingVietnamandChina,encouragedandsupportedbythepoliticalelite(Drury2009:44–46).Inthewakeofthisrenaissance,pharmaceuticalfactoriesandcorporationshavemushroomedacrosstheregion,specializingintheproductionofwholesaleingredientsorprocessedtraditionalmedicines.InlightofthehighincidenceoffakeingredientsinTCM(notonlyinrhinohornmedicines),butitisalsoreasonabletoassumethatsomeconsumerswoulddisplayamarketpreferenceforfactory-producedmedicinesbasedontrustinthereputationanddeliveryofgenuineproductsofsuchcompanies.Interestingly,manymedicinesstallsandpractitionerscarrybothfactory-producedTCMproductsandrawingredientsofmedicinessothatdoctorsandpatientscanpreparemedicalpreparations.462Whilehealthpractitionersandpatientssupportedfactory-producedmedicinesinsouthernAfrica,thepricewasasignificantconsiderationinchoosingmedicines.Thisisparticularlypertinentinlightofthenotionofintellectualpropertyrightsindebatesgoverningtheuseoforiginalversusgenericmedicinesandthehighincidenceofcounterfeitmedicineswithunknownhealthimpacts(Hübschle2010-2011).
357
TCMtradersandconsumersreferredtoarhinohornpillproducedinChina,whichsupposedly
containspowderedrhinohorn.Vietnameseshopkeepersandstallholdersrevealedthatthe
rhinohornpillscontainednotonlyrhinohornbutalsogoldandotherherbalingredients.One
dealerexplainedtheuseofthepillasfollows:
“Itisrecommendtodrinkthreepillsaday.Itisverygoodforpeoplehavingadiseaselikestroke,highbloodpressure,andithelpswithhangovers.Whensomeonegetsdrunk,youtakeapill,thenextmorningyouwillfeelcompletelynormal.”
UponcloserinspectionofthepillsonsaleinthebackchamberofaTCMwholesaler,the
Mandarindosageformindicatedwaterbuffalohornasthemainactiveingredient.When
askedaboutthis,theshopkeeperexplainedthattheform“lied”toconcealthereal
ingredientsbecauseitwasforbiddentosellrhinohorn(Interview,2013).463Sheandother
TCMdealersexpressednoreservationsorscruplesasregardsthesaleofanillegalcommodity
(rhinohorn)orafakesubstitute(waterbuffalopills).Thepriceofthepillsrangedbetween
250000to700000VietnameseDong(8.90€to24.80€),whichinitselfwasanindicationthat
theratherlargepills(2cmindiameter)wrappedinintricatelycarvedwoodenboxesmight
containnorealrhinohorn.Thedealerexplainedthatthepricerangewaslinkedtothe
amountofrhinohorncontainedinsideindividualpills.Itisdoubtfulthatanyregistered
pharmaceuticalcompanywouldproduceillegalmedicinesinthecurrentregulatory
environmentunlessitwerestate-sanctioned.Waterbuffalowasthelikelymainactive
ingredientinthepills.
OneChinesepharmaceuticalcompanyhashoweverbeenontheradarofconservatorsand
journalistsalike(Beech/Perry2011;Cota-Larson2013;Nowell2012a)duetoitsprofessed
objectiveofproducingpillsfromrhinohornshavings.In2006,theLongHuiPharmaceutical
463Researchintocounterfeitpharmaceuticals(UNODC2009;UNODC2010)hasshownthatitisveryhardtodistinguishthepackagingoforiginalsandcounterfeitmedicines.Somepharmaceuticalcorporationshaveintroducedbarcodestoprotectconsumersagainstthepurchaseofcounterfeitmedication.Theconsumerverifiestheauthenticityofthepillsbycheckingthecodeviatextmessageorthroughabarcodescannerontheirmobilephone(WorldHealthOrganisation/InternationalMedicalProductsAnti-CounterfeitingTaskforce2012).Itriedtoestablishwhethercounterfeitrhinopillswereaproblemandwhatrecourseconsumershadshouldtheybuy‘fake’pills.Thestated“true”ingredientsofthepillswereofnoconsequencetosellersandconsumers.Thisfindingappearstosupportdatathathornconsumptionandpossessionincreasinglyfulfilsstatusupliftingratherthanhealthfunctions.
358
Companyannouncedplanstofarmrhinoswiththeobjectiveof“rhinopropagationand
scientificresearch”(LongHuiCorporation2006:1).The“Shavingaliverhinohorntechnology
andrhinohornpharmacologicalstudy”wouldseehornshavedoffliveanimalsbymeansof
“self-suctionlivingrhinoceroshornscrapingtool”formedicinalpurposes(LongHui
Corporation2006:4;Beech/Perry2011).Thebusinessplan(translationbytheRhinoResource
Centre:LongHuiCorporation2006)stated:
“RhinohornisveryimportantintraditionalChinesemedicinefieldduetoitsfollowingeffects:detoxificationandanti-cancer,eliminatingpathogenicheatfromtheblood,removingeczema.RhinohornresourceisrarebecauserhinoareprotectedbyWorldOrganizationandnobodyshallcatchandkillthemordotradeactivitiesonrhinohorns.Chinesegovernmentencouragespeopletodevelopnewsubstituteforit,butnosubstantialprogresshasbeenmade.Therefore,rhinohornmarketdemandwillbegreat.”
Thecompanyproposedtheproductionofseveraltypesofpillsandtonicscontainingrhino
horn.Thebusinessplanhasbeentakenoffthecompany’swebsiteintheinterimasitclashes
bothwithCITESrulesandChinesedomesticlaws,whichbananyuseofrhinohornunlessits
purposeistoresearchviablesubstitutesforuseinmedicines(ThePeople'sRepublicofChina
1993).ATimeMagazineexposésuggeststhatLonghuiisasubsidiaryoflargeweapons
manufacturer–theHawkgroup–withstronglinkstothehighestechelonsofthepolitical
eliteinChina(Beech/Perry2011).EnvironmentalactivistsclaimthatLonghuihasestablished
tworhinofarmsinChinastocked“withdozensofrhinosimportedfromSouthAfrica”(Welz
2012).ParliamentaryrecordsconfirmthatatleastfourSouthAfricanwhiterhinoswere
exportedtoaLonghui“breedingfacility”in2010(Molewa2012b)andofficially,afurther68
whiterhinoswereexportedtoChinaintheperiod2007toearly2012(Molewa2012b).464It
remainsunclearwhetheranyhornharvestinghastakenoristakingplaceatanyChinese
breedingfacilities(Milliken/Emslie/Talukdar2009:7).465Chinesestateofficialsvehemently
464ChinaandSouthAfrica’sofficialimportandexportnumbersofliverhinosdonotcorrespond(alsocomparewithChapter4),whichledtoabriefmoratoriumonthesaleofliveanimals.AccordingtoCITESdata,SouthAfricaexported193rhinosbetween2006and2009whilerecipientcountriesreportedtheimportof235rhinos(Milliken/Emslie/Talukdar2009:7)465Aresearchinformantvisitedastate-runbreedingfacilityin2013.Thedelegationwasreportedlyshownhealthyrhinosbutnoneoftheirprogeny.Therewerenosignsofhornharvesting;itwouldappearunlikelythatforeignvisitorswouldbegivenprivilegedaccesshoweverpositivelyinclinedtheymightbetowardsthefarmingorharvestingofrhinos.
359
denyanyextracurricularactivitiesinvolvingthedehorningorshavingofimportedrhinosat
theCITESCoP15inQatar(Beech/Perry2011).Conservatorshavehoweverqueriedthehigh
numberofAfricanwhiterhinosexportedtoChinaforthepurposeofrangeexpansionwhen
theregionisclimaticallydifferentfromthewhiterhino’snaturalhabitat(Cota-Larson2013).
8.6Fakehornproductionandqualitycontrolatthesource
Accordingtolawenforcementofficialsandcriminalactors(InterviewsinMozambiqueand
SouthAfrica,2013),thereis“willingseller,willingbuyer”foreveryrhinohorninsouthern
Africa;inotherwords,horn‘producers’donothavetosearchforbuyersasthehornispre-
orderedanddemandoutstripssupply.Theonlyhorn“floatingaround”is“aguylookingfora
buyerwithafalsehorn”(Interviewwithlawenforcer4,2013).Greedyindividualshopingto
“makeaquickbuck”havefallenvictimtofakehorndealers.AsisthecaseinAsia,cheated
individualshavenorecoursetothelawastheyweredabblingonthewrongsideofthelaw.A
biodiversityinvestigatorwithasleighofSchadenfreudesaid(Interview,2013):
“Wehavegotguysherethatwentandgotbankoverdraftstobuyrhinohornandthentheygotit.Itwasfalsehornandtheyarestillpayingofftheirbankoverdrafts.”
Hornbuyersandintermediariesfulfilasimilarroleatthesource.LiketheirAsian
counterparts,theyuseagooddoseofcommonsenseandthemantra“ifyouareAfrican,you
willknow”(Interviewwithconvictedpoacher16,2013).Atransporterexplains(Interviewwith
intermediary2,2013):
“Rhinohornisverytoughmaterial,evenhowmuchyoutrytocrushitdown,youcannotcrushit.Evenhowmuchyoutrytohititonthefloororonarock,youcannotcrushit.Butwithfakehorn,itbreaks.Hornmaterialiseasytoidentify.Forme,IgrewupintheruralareasandIalmostknowallkindsofhorns.Gamehorns,domesticanimalhorns,horns–IknowanumberofthemsoIcaneasilyidentifythem:Thisoneisahorn,thisoneisarock…Thearticle,howmuchyoucangetforit…”
ThequalityoffakehornvariesfromintricatelycutwoodenhornreplicastoErsatzhornmade
outofresin.African-basedscammershavetodealwiththefamiliarityofbuyersand
smugglerswithhorn;thefinerdetailssuchasthesmelloffreshlyharvestedhorn(withallthe
360
bloodandgore)havetobeconsideredintheproductionprocess.Aconvictedhornsmuggler
relatedthefollowing(Interview,2013):
“Theyputsomeotherbloodofwhatitsmellslikebecauseithasasmell.Very,verybadsmell.ThatsmellIknowit.Ifitisanothersmell,Iknowit'snottherealone.Youknowthethingis,theyusedtoputshampooorColgate–ifyoumixit,ittakesawaythesmell.Ifyoutaketheshampoo,youcan'tsmellit,noteventhedogs.466Sowhenitcomesforustotest,weuseahammer.Youmusthitit,almost3times.Veryhard.Youhititinthemiddle.Therealrhinohornwillneverbreak.Butifitisafakeone,itwillbreak.”
Sophisticatedfraudstersalsodressupintheuniformsofactorswhowouldhavelegitimate
accesstorhinohorn;uniformsofKNPrangersandtherequisiterangerregalia,forexample,
carry“streetcred”467andpersuasivevaluebecausethecarrierofsuchauniformis
recognizedassomeoneworkingintheKNPwithdirectaccesstorhinohorn.Whilesome
rangersarecomplicitintheillegalsupplychain(comparewiththepreviouschapter),theyare
nottheprimaryscammers.Theseuniformsmaylandupinthehandsofscammersthrough
indirectfamily,communityorfriendshipnetworks.
Roguewildlifeprofessionalsandrhinoownerswhosellrhinohornillegallyfromstockpiles
onlytransactwithknownandtrustedpeers.Severalwildlife‘kingpins’andintermediaries
fulfiltheroleofqualitycontrol,transportationandotherfunctionslinkedtothisillegalmarket
exchange.Farmersandwildlifeprofessionalsaresociallyembeddedwithinasmall
homogeneouswealthygroupoflandownersthataretiedtogetherbyacommonpolitical
outlook,cultureandtraditionandagooddoseofsurvivalinstinctinlightofpolitical
transformationandthechangingofthepoliticalguard,whichcarrieduncertaintyastothe
questionoflandownershipandrestitution.
466Shampooortoothpasteisusedtoconcealthesmellofrhinohornfromsnifferdogsspecificallyemployedtosearchforrhinohornandwildlifecontrabandontravellersorintheirbelongings.467Alsoknownas‘streetsmart’,‘streetcred’iscolloquialforacceptanceofsomeoneamongstyoungpeopleinurbansettings.Italsoreferstoanactor’sabilitytointeractatstreetlevel.
361
8.7Cooperationbetween‘con-men’anddealersRhinohorn“con-men”468and‘real’horndealerstendtoco-existinharmony,mutually
benefitingfromeachother’sbusiness.AccordingtoaformerAsianintermediarycurrently
incarceratedinaSouthAfricanprison(Interview,2013),criminalactorsonbothendsofthe
supplychainwouldknowinglybuyhigh-qualityfakesfrom‘con-men’.Criminalactorsprocure
fakerhinohornfortwopurposes.Thefakehorn469iseitherusedasadecoytodistractlaw
enforcementofficialsfrombigconsignmentsof‘real’hornpassingthroughaportofentryor
entrepôt,ortoreplacerealhorntakenfromgovernmentstockpilesandpolicesafes(where
confiscatedhornfromcustomsinterdictionsandcriminalcasesisstored).Inthelattercase,
SouthAfricanlawenforcementorconservationofficialswouldswapthehornwithfakesand
sellittorhinohorntraffickers.Criminalactors(InterviewsinSouthAfricaandVietnam,2013)
confirmedthatlawenforcementofficialsalsolaunderedconfiscatedhornintoillegalmarkets
onthedemandsideofthemarket.Asobservedearlier,confiscatedhornfrominformal
marketsorTCMapothecariesseldomenterstheofficialchainofcustodyandthusofficials
wouldnotneedtoprovide‘Ersatz’horns.470
Theuseofdecoys,ontheotherhand,issimilartothe‘deadcowsforpiranhas’ployin
transnationaldrugtraffickingoperations.Alargenumberofdrugmulesareearmarkedto
serveas‘deadmeat’thrownto‘piranhas’(lawenforcementofficers)todiverttheirattention
fromdrugsmugglingprofessionals.471Rhinosmugglersusefakerhinohorntodistractlaw
enforcementofficials(Interviewwithsmugglingintermediaries;MozambiqueandSouth
Africa,2013).Itwouldappearcounterintuitiveforcriminalnetworksandtransportersto
468“Con-men”isshortfor“confidencemen”,atricksterwhomanagestowinsomeone’strustinordertodeceivethemlater.469Criminalactorsmightalsoemployoneortwosmall‘real’hornstodistractlawenforcement.470Thehighincidenceofcorruptandillegalactivitiesoflawenforcementofficialspartiallyexplainswhyrhinohorninterdictionratesareparticularlylowincomparisontoactualrhinoskilledfortheirhorn.Thesectiononsmuggling(seeChapter7)providesfurtherdetailsonthesophisticationofhornsmugglingoperations.Itbearsmentioningthatanunknownnumberofillegallyharvestedrhinohornneverentersillegalsupplychains.Suchhornisstockpiledforitsrarityvalueandkeptasaninvestment.471Typicallythedrugsyndicatewouldtip-offlawenforcementaboutanexpecteddrugdelivery.Whilelawenforcementdealswiththetipoffandissufficientlydistracted,otherdrugcourierswithlargerquantitieswillpassthroughportsofentryundetected(Hübschle2008).
362
sacrificerealrhinohornhoweversmallthequantitybecauseofitshighstreetvalueandthe
sophisticatedtransportmethodsemployedtoshiphornfromsupplytoconsumermarkets.
Vietnameseauthoritiesreportedseveralinterdictionsofcomparativelysmallquantitiesof
rhinohornrangingfrom0,55to0,95kgin2013(Interviewwithgovernmentofficial,Hanoi,
2013;dataprovidedbyCITESmanagementauthority,Vietnam),whichsuggeststhatthe
smugglerswere“rookie”rhinomules,472opportunistichornbuyersor“sacrificiallambs”.The
smugglingoffakerhinohornisregardedafarlessseriousoffencethansmugglingrealrhino
horninAsia.On-linesearchesandinterviewsidentifiedtwocasesoffakerhinohornreported
tolawenforcement:asuspectedsmugglerwasreleasedafterarhinohorninhispossession
turnedouttobefakeinChitwanNationalParkinIndia(HindustanTimes2013)andan
Indonesiancourtsentencedamanto18monthsinjailafterhesold70fakeSumatranrhino
horns(DeutschePresseAgentur2004).InSouthAfricaandneighbouringZimbabwe,the
smugglingorpossessionoffakerhinohornalsoobtainspenalties(Muleya2014;Hosken/SAPA
2012).
8.8Fakeantiquelibationcupsandthenotionof‘pre-Convention’rhinohorn
Anotherformofdeceptioninvolvestheconversionofreal‘raw’hornintofakeantique
libationcupsandotherornamentalcarvings.Theseobjetsd’artaresoughtafterartefactsin
Asianmarkets,theUSandamongstartcollectorsandconnoisseursofAsianantiquecarvings
(UnitedStatesDistrictCourt2013:2).473A2013courtcaseheardbytheUnitedStatesDistrict
CourtinthedistrictofJersey(UnitedStatesDistrictCourt2013)involvedtheownerofan
antiquebusinessinChina,ZhifeiLiwhohadprocuredandsmuggledrhinohornandobjets
d’artmadeoutofrhinohornandivoryfromtheUSthroughHongKongtoChina.Thecaseis
noteworthyasitillustratesfirstly,theglobalnatureofrhinohorntrafficking,andsecondly,472‘Rookie’isacolloquialtermusedforapersonthatisinexperienced,afirst-timeroramateur.473Libationcupshavebecomehighlyvaluedandcovetedartefactsoverthepastdecade,spurredon,amongstotherreasons,bythehighpricesachievedatauctionsofrenownedinternationallyrecognizedauctionhouses(seealsoChapter3).Astorythatachievedworldnotorietyinvolvedananonymouscollectorpickingupa17th-centuryChineselibationcupfor$4(Australian$)ataSydneycharityshopandsellingitfor$75640throughSotheby’sAustraliaafewmonthslater.AnotherChinese‘Ding’bowlsoldforUS$2.225millionatSotheby’sNewYorkauctioninMarch2013.Thesellerfoundthefamousbowlataneighbourhoodtagsalein2007.Unawareofthepotentialvalue,thebowlwasboughtfor$3(Cockington2013).
363
thesophisticationandinnovativetechniquesofthoseinvolvedintheprocurementand
smugglingofprocessedandrawrhinohornacrosstheworld.Liadmittedtosellingand
smuggling30rawrhinohornstofactoriesinChinawhererawrhinohornsarecarvedintofake
antiquesknownaszuojiu(Mandarinfor“tomakeold”).Theextraordinaryvaluationofrhino
hornwasevidentwhenthescrapsfromthecarvingprocessweresoldontheillegalmedicines
market(USDepartmentofJustice2013).Asringleaderofatransnationaltraffickingoperation,
LialsoreceivedandsoldartefactsmadeoutofrhinohornorivoryfromaccomplicesinEurope
andtheUS,andprocuredartobjectsonaninternetauctionwebsiteandthroughphone
bidding.LiwouldprovidephotosoftheartefactstoagroupofwealthyChinesenationals.If
theywereinterestedinpurchasingtheoffering,thentheywouldhavetomakeanadvance
payment(UnitedStatesDistrictCourt2013:8–9),suggestingthattheysharedthesamesocial
network.Accordingtothecourtpapers(UnitedStatesDistrictCourt2013:16),Lialsomade
claimsthat“hedidnotbuy“freshhorns”butonlyhornsthatwere50yearsold”,andthatno
CITESpermitswererequiredforpre-Conventionhorns.Bothclaimswerenottruebutpointto
anotherformofdeceptionandfraud,namelythesaleofpre-Conventionhorn.Thisployhas
beenusedtosmuggleandtraderhinohorn(andivory),ostensiblyattainedfromhunting
trophiesandartefactspre-datingCITES.
8.9ConclusionThischapterillustrateshowactorsbridgeseveralcoordinationproblems,ofimportancetothe
unhinderedflowofrhinohorn,namelythecoordinationproblemsofvalue,cooperationand
security.Inlightofthehighpriceofrhinohorn,itisnotsurprisingthatcriminal
entrepreneurs,aswellasactorsfromthelegalsector,haveseizedathrivingbusiness
opportunitythroughtheproductionoffakerhinohorn.Thehighincidenceoffakehornin
circulationposesaproblemtohornsuppliersandconsumersalike.Bothactorgroupshave
developedmechanismstoensurequalitycontrolandproofofprovenance.Intermediariesand
smugglersdonotonlyensurequalitycontrolbutalsothesecuretransferofprecioushorn
consignments.Thelevelofcooperationiscomplexaswellassophisticatedasitlinkssuppliers
toconsumers.Thoseconsumerswhocannotrelyontrust-worthyreferralsfromwithintheir
364
socialnetworks,hiretheservicesofhornassessors.Whatiscuriousaboutcertaintypesof
fakerhinohornisitshighstreetvalue,furtheraccentuatingthesacredvalueofrhinohornin
consumermarkets.Thefactthatconsumersarewillingtopaygoodmoneyforfakerhinohorn
reinforcesthatmanyconsumersappreciaterhinohornasastatussymbol.
365
Conclusion:Howcantherhinobebetterprotected?
“Idon’tbelievethatwecanstopthehuntingaslongastherearerhinos,thehuntingwill continue.Andas longasChinesearestillhere, it’s impossible tostop (Interviewwithpoacher,Massingir,2013).”
“Theonlythingthatcanstophunting is if thegovernmentspeakstopeople likeme,theexperiencedandthebigbossesbecauseweknowthebusiness,andwhogoestohunt where and when, we also know the buyers. We can help the government toarrestallthosewhodorhinopoaching(Interviewwithkingpin3,Massingir,2013).”
“Idon’tthinkthatgivingrhinostofarmersandcommunitieswillbethesolution.Thedemandistoobig.SayyoucuttwohornsfromyourrhinoandtheChinesehaveorderedfivehorns,soyouwillbeforcedtogoandhuntforthreemorehorns(Interviewwithrhinokingpin1,2013).”
Whyhastherhinonotbeenbetterprotected?Theleadingresearchquestionofthisdissertationaskedwhytherhinohasnotbeenbetter
protecteddespitethemyriadmeasuresemployedtodisruptthemarket.Atheoretical
frameworkgroundedinthesociologyofmarketswasusedtoexplainthestructureand
functioningoftheillegalmarketinrhinohorn.Itwasarguedthatasociologicalstudyof
valuation,competition,cooperationandsecurityintheillegalmarketforrhinohorncould
assistinunderstandingthereasonswhyitissodifficulttodisruptthevariousflowsofrhino
horn.Centraltotheanalysiswastheideaofahistoricallock-inandtheconceptof“contested
illegality”,alegitimizationmechanismemployedbyactorstojustifyillegaleconomicactionin
contraventionofthelawonthebooks,orusedtodefendtheexploitationoflegalor
regulatoryloopholes.Thefollowingsectionssummarizethefindings,endingwithan
assessmentoftherhino’slong-termchancesofsurvival.
ThesacredvalueofrhinohornCulturalbeliefsledtothesacralizationofrhinohorninAsiancommunities;however,the
animalitselfisnotimbuedwithsacredvalue.Thevaluationofrhinohorninconsumer
marketstendstotrumpconservationandanti-poachinginitiativesinplacesgeographicallyfar
366
removedfromtheconsumer.Thesanctityofancientbeliefsandsociallyacceptednormsnot
onlysupersedesrhinoconservationinitiativesbutalsointernationaltradebansanddomestic
rules.Thehistoryoftheculturaluseofrhinohornhighlightsthedifficultiesassociatedwith
attemptstoreversesocialnormsthataresupportedbyculturalbeliefsbutoutofsyncwith
modernregulations.Whilefewconsumersupholdthequasi-mythicalvaluationofrhinohorn
asmiraclecureforabouquetofailments,itstranscendentalandsacredvalueremains,and
explains,inadditiontotheincreasingrarityofthespeciesanditsuseasastatussymbol,the
highpriceofrhinohorn.Thehighpriceontheconsumermarkethasledtocomparativelyhigh
disbursementsforrhinohornonthesupplyside,facilitatingtheentryofnewhornproducers
(rhinopoachers).Thedissertationarguesfurthermorethattrophyhunterswerecrucialtothe
economicvaluationofrhinosonthesupplyside.Inthisinstance,rhinohornisappreciatedfor
itssymbolicvalue.Boththeeconomicandculturalvaluationhaveledtothehighdemandfor
rhinohorn,thusresolvingthecoordinationproblemofvalue.
Historicallock-in
Thedissertationshowedthatrhinoconservationandprotectionhavebeencloselylinkedto
coloniallandappropriation,subjugation,exploitationandlossofhuntingrightsoflocaland
indigenouscommunities.TheprivatizationoffarmlandandwildlifeinSouthAfricaheightened
thealienationandmarginalizationoflocalcommunitiesfurther,creatingahugeriftbetween
localpeopleontheonehand,andconservationareasandwildanimalsontheother.
Exacerbatedbythehighnumberofdeathsofpoachingsuspectsinparks,theprevalent
sentimentamongmanylocalsisoneofthewildanimalsgettingvaluedmorethanblacklives.
Thissentimentisalsoemployedasalegitimizationtool.Rhinohornisnotonlyhuntedforits
financialbutalsoforitssymbolicvalue.Thesymbolicvalueofrhinohornislinkedtothe
historicallock-inandsystematicdisenfranchisementoftheruralcommunitieslivingaround
protectedareas.Underpinningtheseconservationregimesarearchaicandelitistpreservation
andconservationparadigmsthatdiscountthepotentialforharmoniousrelationships
betweenlocalcommunitiesandwildlife.Inthemoderncontext,parksandgamereserves
continuetopresentmanifestationsofcolonialdispossessionandapartheidsegregation.
Conservationareasareseenassymbolsofeliteinterestsandwealth,inaccessibletothepoor
367
majority.Theseproblematicconservationapproachesandparadigmshaveledtoahistorical
lock-in,whereromanticandutopiannotionsof‘Africa’sWildEden’continuetoundermine
thesupportandbuy-infromlocalcommunitiesinwildlifeconservation.
Contestedillegality
Thenotionof‘contestedillegality’wasintroducedasalegitimationstrategyofimportant
actorswhojustifytheirparticipationinillegalorgrayflowsofrhinohornbasedonthe
perceivedillegitimacyoftherhinohornprohibition.Theprocessofillegalizationofthetrade
inrhinohorncommencedinthelate1970swhenthemultilateralenvironmentaltreatyCITES
enteredintoforce.Priortothat,economicexchangesinvolvingrhinohornwereeitherlegalor
undetermined.Thediffusionofthetradebanatthedomesticlevelinrange,transitand
consumercountrieshassucceededtovaryingdegrees.Thedissertationhighlightedimportant
actorssuchaspublicofficials,lawenforcementofficials,wildlifeprofessionals,local
communitiesandcriminalactorswhodonotacceptthelawonthebooksforavarietyof
reasonsincludingtheperceivedunfairnessoftheban,divergentsocialorculturalnormsthat
clashwiththeban,orforpolitico-historicalreasons.Contestedillegalityislinkedcloselytothe
coordinationproblemofvaluation.Forexample,consumerswhovaluerhinohornasasacred
goodareunperturbedaboutbreakingthelawwhenpurchasingrhinohorn.Inaddition,both
suppliersandconsumersdisplayasenseofentitlement.Theseactorsfeelthattheyhavea
righttousenaturalresources,whichthelawprohibits.Thereisthusacognitivedissonance
betweenthelawonthebooks,culturalpracticesandsocialnorms.Whileruralcommunities
continuetofeelthatthestateandothernon-stateactorsvaluerhinosmorethanthelivesof
blackpeople,poachingislikelytoobtainlimitednegativesanctionsandcontinueunabated.
Thenotionofcontestedillegalityalsofacilitatedthisresearchprojectgreatly.Actorswhodo
notbelieveinthelegitimacyofthetradebanhadnoqualmstosharetheirinsightsonillegal
economicaction.
368
Theinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegality
Oneofthekeyfindingswastheinvolvementofactorsfromthelegalsectorsuchaswildlife
professionalsandpublicofficialsintheillegalandgrayflowsofrhinohorn.Bolsteredby
sentimentsofcontestedillegality,suchactorshavenoqualmstoexploitorbypassregulatory
loopholes.Theseactorsbelongtoinfluentialandtransnationalsocialnetworkswithlinksto
politicalandeconomicelitesinsupply,transitandconsumercountries.Whileconventional
narrativespointtotheinvolvementoforganizedcrimeintransnationalrhinohornflows,this
labelisonlycorrectifwildlifeprofessionalsandstateofficialsaresubsumedunderit,andthe
dominantroleoflocalactorsisacknowledged(asopposedtotheotheringofforeigncriminals
–organizedcrimeasan‘alienconspiracytheory).Thedissertationshowedthatstateactors
facilitatedtheeconomicvaluationofrhinohornonthesupplysidebyprivatizingrhinos.The
internationalregulatoryprotectionregimeisriddledwithambiguitiessuchasallowingthe
trophyhuntingofrhinos,whichusuallyleadstoahuntingtrophy(astatussymbol)while
prohibitingothernotdissimilarusesofrhinohorn(suchasobjetsd’artorstatussymbols).The
juxtapositionofwhitetrophyhunter474versusblackpoacheriseyeopening.Whilewealthy
trophyhuntersareallowedtokillrhinosforafee(ostensiblyhuntingprofitsareemployedto
serveconservationobjectives),localswithnoeconomicresourcesarestigmatizedaspoachers
whentrespassingandhuntingwildanimalsonlandthatwasformerlytheirs.Theinterface
betweenlegalityandillegalitythusrelatestoagentsofthestatefacilitatingillegalflows,the
existenceoflegalandillegalmeansofhorn‘production’andlegitimateandillegitimateuses
ofrhinohorn,aswellasanarmsracebetweenstateactorsandtheircloseanti-poaching
associatesontheoneside,andpoachersandlocalcommunitieslivinginclosevicinityorin
parks,ontheother.Thisinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegalityhasledtoambiguityasto
whatislegalorillegal.Thegrayareahasledtoampleopportunitiestobypassformalrules,
aidingandabettingillegaleconomicaction.
474Therearealsopoachinggroupsconsistingofwhitepoachers.Forexample,incidentsofso-called“chemicalpoaching”involvedwildlifeveterinarians,gamecapturers,helicopterpilotsandprofessionalhunterswhouseveterinarydrugstoanaesthetizerhinos.Theanimalisdehornedonceitissedated,andthehornissoldtobuyers.
369
TheresilienceofflowsThemetaphorofflowswasemployedtoshowtheadaptabilityandresilienceofflows.
However,thehistoricallock-increatedthroughtheimplementationofarchaicconservation
paradigms,theregulatorybackdropandtheresultantexpressionofcontestedillegalityhave
createdfavourableconditionsfortheillegalmarketinrhinohorntogrowandflourish.Rhino
poachingdidnotemergefromavacuum,factorssuchasthehistoricallock-in,thesacred
valueofrhinohornandcontestedillegalityfacilitatetheresilienceofrhinohornflowsand
undermineprotectivemeasures.Variouschaptersshowedhowactorsmanagedtoresolvethe
coordinationproblemsofvalue,cooperation,competitionandsecurity.Byresolvingthese
issues,actorscreatedabridgefromAfricansavannahstoAsianmarkets.Whileanalysesof
legalorformalmarketsfocusonthecoordinationproblemofvalue,cooperationand
competition,itisarguedherethatactorsinillegalmarketshavetodealwithanadditional
coordinationproblem,thatofsecurity.Althoughactorsinlegaltransnationalmarketsmay
likewiseinstitutesecurityprecautions,theneedtoexercisecautionandimplementasecurity
planismorepressinginillegalmarkets.Notonlyisthesecurityofillegalmarketparticipants
atstakebutalsothecontinuityofthesupplychain.Especiallyincaseswherehigh-value
contrabandsuchasrhinohornistransported,actorsneedtoensurethatthegoodisnot
interceptedenroutetothemarket.Usually,thesafestandmostexpedientmethodinvolves
facilitationand/ortransportofrhinohornbyuntouchableagentsofthestate,including
diplomatsandlawenforcementofficials.Beckert’stheoryofsocialorderinlegalmarkets
stressesthatactorswanttocreate“stableworlds”byresolvingthecoordinationproblemsof
value,cooperationandcompetition(Beckert2009).Itisarguedherethatactorsinillegal
marketsthriveonchaosandunpredictability.Whiletheyreduceuncertaintybyaddressing
securityconcerns,collaborators,flowsandrouteschangefrequently.Itstandstoarguethat
illegalmarketsthriveinastateofdisorganizedcrimeororganizedchaos.Manyoftheillegal
activitiesdescribedinthisdissertationflourishbecauseillegalmarketactorsareadaptable
andresilient,andnothamstrungbybureaucraticrulesofengagementthatslowdownlaw
enforcementresponses.
370
ThestructureofthemarketThedissertationhasfocusedonlegal,grayandillegalflowsofrhinohornwhilealso
presentinganoverviewoftheproductionandfunctionoffakeandErsatzrhinohorninthe
overallmarketforrhinohorn.Theseflowswerepresentedasdistinctentitiesforthepurposes
ofanalyticalclarity.However,thesefourflowsareinterconnectedandformacomposite
whole.Inessence,themarketinrhinohornisconstitutedofhybridcomplexflowsthat
involverecurringactorswhoholdsocialcapital.Thedissertationstressedtheroleof
intermediarieswhoplaytheroleofconnectingproducerstoconsumers.Intermediarieshave
accesstotransnationalsocialandcriminalnetworksandknowledgeofthe‘product’and
regulatoryloopholes.WhileAsiannationalswereofteninvolvedintransnationaltransport
facilitation,localintermediariessuchasthepoachingkingpinsandwildlifeprofessionals
providethemostcrucialbridgebetweenAfricaandAsia.Whilehornproducersaremostly
closedhomogeneousgroups,theselocalintermediariesareworldly,connectedandproneto
takingcalculatedrisksthatopennewopportunitiesandbusinessventures.Asmentionedin
theearliersectionontheinterfacebetweenlegalityandillegality,thedissertationcautiously
appliestheideaoftheinvolvementoforganizedcrimeduetoitstraditionalassociationwith
foreignmafia-typegroups.Itstandstoarguethatbothlegalandcriminalactorsconstitute
organizedrhinocrime.ItisacknowledgedthatseveralpipelinesoutofAfricainvolve
professionalsmugglerswhohaveexpertknowledgeofsmugglingbothlegalgoodsand
contrabandalongtransnationalflows.Pivotaltounderstandingthearchitectureofrhinohorn
flowsisanuancedawarenessofhowtheeconomicvaluationofrhinosbywayofthe
privatizationofownershiprights(theconversionofapublicgoodtoprivateownership),the
colonialhistoryoflandappropriationandtheconversionofcommunally-ownedlandinto
conservationareashasopenedtheproverbialcanofwormsintheSouthAfricancase.
TheoreticalcontributionThedissertationcontributestoBeckert’stheoryofcoordinationproblemsbyintroducingthe
coordinationproblemofsecurity,whichisofrelevancetoactorsintransnationalandillegal
markets.Whilevariousscholarshavewrittenaboutthenotionofcontestedillegality,itis
371
introducedasamechanismemployedtolegitimizeillegalandgrayeconomicaction.Whileit
isdifficulttogeneralizefromonecasestudy,theillegalmarketinrhinohornappearsto
presentanidealtype.Structuralconditionstiedtothehistoricallock-in,contestedillegality,
theparticipationofactorsfromthestateandlegalsector,andtheinterfacebetweenlegality
andillegalitycreatetheperfectenvironmentfortheillegalmarkettoflourish.
Partingwords
Inconclusion,thetitleofthisdissertationisborrowedfromapopularTVseriesthat
dramatizesconflictbetweenrulingroyalelitesinamedievalphantasyepic.Sinceembarking
onthejourneyofresearchingrhinos,Ihavebeenamazedbytheemotions,conflictandmoral
panicthismajesticcreatureinspiresamongstaratherdiversegroupofpeople.OnceIwasin
thethickoftheresearch,itfeltlikeIwasobservingadramaunfoldinginfrontofmyeyes:
Tuggedawayintheirfortresseskings,queens,scribes,advisorsandcompanionswerepitted
againstconquerors,reformersandthepeople–allsurvivinginaratheruncertain
environment.Thedissertationtouchedbrieflyontheroleoftheinternationalcommunity,
conservationNGOsandprivateindividualswhoarefundraisingtosavetherhino.Thesefunds
seldomreachtheplaceswheretheycouldachievetangibleresultsthataffectchangesonthe
ground.Insteadofdedicatingmoniestothemilitarizationofanti-poachingmeasuresor
payinginflatedsalariestoNGOstaff,thestate,theconservationcommunityandinternational
donorsshouldsupportinitiativesthataffectpositivechangesforlocalcommunitiesliving
closetoparks.Consultationshouldbedoneinabottom-upfashionsothatthevoicesof
marginalizedpeoplearefinallyheard.Localcommunitiesneedtobegivenagencytoco-
determinetheirlivelihoods,theoutlookforconservationareasandthewildanimals
containedwithinthem.Onlyoncegainsfromwildlifeandparksenhancethewell-beingof
localcommunities,liveanimalsandparkswillbeattributedwithvalue(beitintrinsicor
instrumental),andrhinoswillhaveafightingchance.Unfortunately,thisdissertationtopic
doesnotexamineagameoradramaseries;itdealswiththereal-lifeissueofthepossible
extinctionofawildanimal.Unlesswechangecourse,therhinoandotherwildanimalswillbe
relegatedtonaturalhistorybooks.
372
AppendixA:ResearchsitesandmapsThefollowingplaceswerevisitedduringthecourseofthisresearchproject:
• KwaZulu-Natal(KZN):Thesouth-easternprovinceofKwaZulu-Natalishometotheport
cityofDurban,severalnationalparksincludingHluhluwe-iMfolozi,Mkuze,
iSimangalisoWetlands,ThembeElephantParkandtheprivategamereservePhinda,
allofwhichwerevisited.
• LimpopoProvince:ThenorthernprovinceofSouthAfricasharesborderswith
Zimbabwe,BotswanaandMozambique.Manyprivategamereservesandfarmsare
locatedinthisprovince,whichisalsohometoaportionoftheKrugerNationalPark
andtheUNESCO-recognizedWaterbergBiosphereReserve.
Map2:MapofSouthAfrica
Source:http://www.safaribookings.com/parks/south-africa(accessed2July2014)
• MpumalangaProvince:TheeasternprovinceofSouthAfricabordersSwazilandand
MozambiqueandholdsthesouthernsectionsoftheKrugerNationalPark.Thecapital
373
cityMombela,formerlyknownasNelspruit,andthetownofWhiteRiverwere
importantpit-stops.
• Gauteng:Johannesburg,SouthAfrica’sbusinesscentreandtheadministrativecapital
ofSouthAfrica,Pretoria,arebothlocatedintheGautengProvince.National
departments(ministerialoffices),lawenforcementagencies,thenational
prosecutorialauthority(NPA),NGOsandprofessionalassociationsarealsohousedin
thisprovince.
Map3:MapoftheKrugerNationalPark,LimpopoNationalParkandMassingir
Source:MapprovidedbyBrianSandberg475
• KrugerNationalPark(KNP):TwotripsweremadetoSouthAfrica’sflagshipsafaripark,
theKrugerNationalParkwheremostoftheworld’sremainingrhinosliveandare
poached.AttheinvitationoftheUniversityofPretoria,ajointpresentation(witha475Adetailedmapisalsoaccessibleat:https://goo.gl/maps/um6ky(mycreation)
374
formercolleague)onresearchingsensitivesubjectswasgivenattheOneHealth
Conferenceduringthefirstmonthoffieldwork.Theconferenceandsubsequent
networkingopenedmanydoorstoengagewiththeconservationcommunity,KNPand
Mozambique.Uponreceiptoftheresearchpermission,afurther3weeksofintense
fieldworkwereundertakeninthePark.
• Mozambique:Manyrhinopoacherseitheroriginateorcommencetheircross-border
huntingexpeditionsfromsmallvillagessituatedincloseproximitytotheMozambican
borderwiththeKrugerNationalPark.ThebiggestvillageofMassingirwasvisited
twice,andseveralsmallervillageswerealsofrequented.Ialsospenttimeinthe
LimpopoNationalPark,Chokwe,BeleneandthecapitalcityofMaputo.
• Swaziland:UponcompletingfieldworkintheKrugerNationalPark,aroadtripwas
takenthroughSwazilandenroutebacktoCapeTown.Thecountry’sGameActisboth
laudedasanexemplarypieceoflegislationbecausepoachingcarriesaminimumjail
sentenceoffiveyears(Ramsay2014)andcontestedasdraconian
(Werksman/Cameron/Roderick2014:193).
• Namibia:NamibiaisoneofthefourmajorrhinorangestatesinAfrica
(Duffy/Emslie/Knight2013b).Thecountry’scommunalwildlifeconservancieshave
becomeamodelforcommunity-basedconservationandsustainablelivelihoods.
Historically,elephantsandrhinoswerehuntedandtradedbytheSouthAfrican
DefenceForceanditsaffiliatesduringthebushwarsinnorthernNamibiaand
southernAngola(Reeve/Ellis1995).Atthetimeoffieldwork,nopoachingincidents
hadoccurredinrecenthistoryandthequestionarose,whyNamibiawasspared.Since
then,poachingnumbershavesoaredandtheoriesthatitwasamatteroftimefor
rhinopoachingtosweepacrossSouthAfrica’snorthernbordershaveindeed
materialized(Duffy/Emslie/Knight2013b:6).
• HongKong:SeveralconsignmentsofsmuggledrhinohornfromSouthAfrica(together
withotherwildlifeproducts)wereinterdictedinHongKong.Thecitywhere‘east
meetswest’offersmanyfascinatingavenuesfortheinvestigationofculturalmeanings
ofwildlifeconsumption,theuseofanimalproductsinTraditionalChineseMedicine
(TCM)andenforcementefforts.TheRegionalOfficeofTRAFFICandWWF-HongKong
hostedme.Thisofferedafootinthedoor,asdidtheinvitationtoprovideaseminar
onmyprojectatthePolicingStudiesForumoftheUniversityofHongKong.
375
Map4:MapofSoutheastAsia
Source:http://webspace.webring.com/people/mj/james_shum/sin-hkg/(accessedon4July2014)
• Vietnam:Accordingtotheliterature(Gwin2012;Milliken/Shaw2012;Rademeyer
2012;Nellemannetal.2014;Gosling/Reitano/Shaw2014;IpsosMarketing2013)rhino
hornisdestinedforbothVietnameseandChinesemarkets.Duetotimeandlanguage
constraintsandtheinnatelimitationsofPh.D.research,Ichosetoundertakeresearch
ofthemarketstructuresandconsumerpreferencesinVietnam.WhileIwasnotable
todofieldworkinChina,IwasabletointerviewChineserespondentsandexpertson
wildlifetradeinChinainSouthAfrica,HongKongandon-line.Ihadidentifiedkey
informantsaheadofthefieldtriptoVietnamandemployedtheservicesoftwo
interpretersinthemajorurbancentresofHoChiMinhCityandHanoi.Severaltripsto
ruralareas,includingtheMekongDelta,wereundertaken.
• Correctionalcentres(prisons)inSouthAfrica:Thefinalmonthoffieldworkentaileda
roadtriptocorrectionalcentresstrewnacrossfiveprovincesofSouthAfrica.30
inmatesconvictedforrhino-relatedoffenceswereinterviewedin15maximum-and
medium-securitycorrectionalcentres.476
476TheDepartmentofCorrectionalServices(DCS)differentiatesbetweenminimum-,medium-andmaximum-securityfacilities.Offenders(astheyarereferredtoinDCSparlance)aresenttothesecorrectionalcentres
376
AppendixB:IndemnityformforinterviewswithoffendersTheresearchguideoftheDepartmentofCorrectionalServicesgavemetheformbelowwith
therequesttohaveallprisonresearchinformantssignitpriortoconductingtheinterview.
dependingontheseriousnessoftheircrime,thelengthoftheirprisonsentenceandconductduringtheirprisonterm.
PARTICIPATION IN INTERVIEW
Indemnity form I ………………………….………………………………………………………..…, Registration number ………………. hereby declare that I am in custody at …………..…………………………………. Center.
\ I hereby agree/do not agree to be interviewed by …………………………..
I do so entirely at my own will and I do not hold the Department of Correctional Services or any of its members, responsible for anything that might transpire from the interview.
I do not want any or expect any reward of any nature for partaking in the interview. I certify that I make this statement out of my own free will and understands the contents thereof.
SIGNED: …………………………………… WITNESS: ………………………………… DATE: …………………… WITNESS: …………………………………
377
Bibliography2010:TheProtectionofStateInformationAct.RepublicofSouthAfrica.
<http://www.r2k.org.za/wp-content/uploads/Protection-of-State-Information-Bill-POSIB_bill06D-2010.pdf>.
50/50,2008:Vietnamembassywascaughtred-handedinillegalrhinohorntransaction.<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4a_UhWlMu8>(23April2015).
‘tSas-Rolfes,Michael,2000:AssessingCITES:Fourcasestudies.In:JonandBarnabasDicksonHutton(ed.)EndangeredSpeciesThreatenedConvention:Thepast,presentandfutureofCITES,theConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFaunaandFlora.London:EarthscanPublicationsLtd.,69-87.
‘tSas-Rolfes,Michael,2012:TheRhinopoachingcrisis:Amarketanalysis:Independentconsultant(February2012).
‘tSas-Rolfes,Michael,2011:SavingAfricanrhinos:Amarketsuccessstory.Bozeman,Montana:PERC.
Abbott,Dina,2006:Disruptingthe‘whiteness’offieldworkingeography.In:SingaporeJournalofTropicalGeography27,326-341.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00265.x>
Abercrombie,Nicholas/StephenHill/BryanSTurner,[1984]2006:Criminology.ThePengiunDictionaryofSociology.LondonPenguinBooks.5th5th.
Abercrombie,Nicholas/StephenHill/BryanS.Turner,[1984]2006:Competition.Dictionaryofsociology.London:PenguinReference.5th5th.
Abraham,S.A.,etal.,2013:Connectionsandcomplexity:NewapproachestothearchaeologyofSouthAsia.WalnutCreek:LeftCoastPress.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=bRHjGtTUr3sC>
Absa,2003.Johannesburg:Absa.Adam,Heribert,1981:ThevocationofasociologistinSouthAfrica.In:JohnRex(ed.)
Apartheidandsocialresearch.Paris:TheUnescoPress,115–128.Adcock,Keryn/RichardEmslie,1994:Theroleoftrophyhuntinginwhiterhinoconservation
withspecialreferencetoBOPParks.Rhinosasgameranchanimals.Onderstepoort,SouthAfrica(9-10September1994).
AfricaGeographic,2012a:Facts&figures.In:AfricaGeographic.AfricaGeographic,2012b:RunBabyRun.In:AfricaGeographic.AfricaHunting.com,2010:HuntingintheAssociatedPrivateNatureReservesadjoiningthe
KrugerNationalPark.AfricaHunting.com.<http://www.africahunting.com/threads/hunting-in-the-associated-private-nature-reserves-adjoining-the-kruger-national-park.15022/>.
AgenciadeInformacaodeMocambique,30April2014:Mozambique:Governmentannouncesnewminimumwages.<http://allafrica.com/stories/201405010229.html>
Aggler,Brian,2008:PresidentTrietreportedlyill,again;PMmovesarmyleaders.Wikileaks:Wikileaks.<https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08HANOI947_a.html>(17March2015).
AIM,2015:Mozambique:Chissanosaysabout500poacherskilledinSouthAfrca.<http://africajournalismtheworld.com/2015/09/23/mozambique-chissano-says-about-500-poachers-killed-in-south-africa/>(23September2015).
Alder,Christine/KennethPolk,2005:Theillicittrafficinplunderedantiquities.In:P.Reichel(ed.)Handbookoftransnationalcrimeandjustice.ThousandOaks:SagePublications,98-113.
378
Amman,Karl,2012:Tigercakeandrhinohorn–awalkontheAsianwildside.In:SWARA.<http://www.karlammann.com/pdf/swara-rhino-piece.pdf>
Amman,Karl,2013a:Hanoiconnection:Therhinohornmafia.<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WhTj_50KMo>(2April2013).
Amman,Karl,2013b:Therhinoandthebling.Amman,Karl,2015a:CharacteristicsofrhinohorntradealongVietnam'snorthernborders:
ConservationActionTrust(15April2015).Amman,Karl,2015b:Therhinohornstoryattheconsumerend.KarlAmman.
<http://www.karlammann.com/rhino-horn.php>.An,Ha,2015:65kgsofsmuggledrhinohorns,ivorybustedatHanoiairport.In:Thanhnien
News,,17April2015.<http://www.thanhniennews.com/society/65-kgs-of-smuggled-rhino-horns-ivory-busted-at-hanoi-airport-42265.html>
Anderson,Chris,2008:Theendoftheory:Willthedatadelugemakesthescientificmethodobsolete?Edge.<http://edge.org/3rd_culture/anderson08/anderson08_index.html>.
Anh,TrầnNguyễn2014:Rhino:Aeulogy.In:TienPhongOnline,12November2012.<http://www.tienphong.vn/xa-hoi/te-giac-loi-ai-dieu-782167.tpo>
AnimalRightsAfrica,2009:Undersiege:RhinocerosesinSouthAfricaAnimalRightsAfrica.Anonymous,2013:RhinoHornprescriptions.Hanoi,HoiAn,CatBaandHoChiMinhCity:TVM
doctors.AnonymousauthorforTheEnvironmentalist,1983:Yemenactstohaltrhinohorndaggers;
scientifictestsfailtoshowrhinohorneffectiveasmedicine.In:TheEnvironmentalist3,153-153.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02240165>
AnonymouswriterforEyeWitnesstoHistory,1997:"OnSafariWithTheodoreRoosevelt,1909.EyeWitnesstoHistory<http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com>(13September2014).
AnthropologySouthernAfrica,2014:Ethicalguidelinesandprinciplesofconductforanthropologists.SouthernAfrica.<http://asna.popcliq.com/images/documents/principles-of-conduct-asa.pdf>.
Appadurai,Arjun,1994:Commoditiesandthepoliticsofvalue.In:SusanM.Pearce(ed.)Interpretingobjectsandcollections.London:Routledge,76-91.
Arets,E.J.M.M.,etal.,2011:Competingclaimsonnaturalresources:GlobaltrendsandlocalcasestudiesWageningnUR.<http://edepot.wur.nl/196220>
ASEAN-WEN,2014:WhatisASEAN-WEN?<http://www.asean-wen.org/index.php/about-us/what-is-asean-wen>
Aspers,Patrik,2011:Markets.Cambridge:Polity.Aspers,Patrik/JensBeckert,2011:Valueinmarkets.In:JensBeckertandPatrikAspers(ed.)
Theworthofgoods.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,3-38.Aulakh,Raveena,2015:Lab-grownhornscouldsaverhinos;Seattlebiotechcompanysays
syntheticpowdermayhelpspareanimalsfrompoachers.In:TheTorontoStar.Ayling,Julie,2013:Whatsustainswildlifecrime?Rhinohorntradingandtheresilienceof
criminalnetworks.In:JournalofInternationalWildlifeLaw&Policy16,57-80.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2013.764776>
Bahn,Susanne/PamelaWeatherill,2013:Qualitativesocialresearch:Ariskybusinesswhenitcomestocollecting‘sensitive’data.In:QualitativeResearch13,19-35.<http://qrj.sagepub.com/content/13/1/19.abstract>
Baillie,J.E.M./E.R.Butcher,2012:Pricelessorworthless?Theworld'smostthreatenedspecies.London:ZoologicalSocietyofLondon.
379
Bales,Kevin,1999:DisposablePeople.NewSlaveryintheGlobalEconomy.Berkeley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Barsh,RusselLawrence,2001:Whostealsindigenousknowledge?In:ProceedingsoftheAnnualMeeting(AmericanSocietyofInternationalLaw)95,153-161.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/25659474>
Basu,Gautam,2014:Concealment,corruption,andevasion:Atransactioncostandcaseanalysisofillicitsupplychainactivity.In:JournalofTransportationSecurity,1-18.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12198-014-0140-8>
Beare,Margaret,2003:Introduction.In:MargaretBeare(ed.)Criticalreflectionsontransnationalorganisedcrime,moneylaundering,andcorruption.Toronto,Canada:UniversityofTorontoPress,XI-XXIX.
Becker,HowardS.,1958:Problemsofinferenceandproofinparticipantobservation.In:Americansociologicalreview23,652-660.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/2089053>
Becker,HowardS.,1967:Whosesideareweon?In:SocialProblems14,239–247.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/799147>
Beckert,Jens,2003:Economicsociologyandembeddedness:Howshallweconceptualizeeconomicaction?In:JournalofEconomicIssues37,769-787.
Beckert,Jens,2007:TheSocialOrderofMarkets.Cologne:MaxPlanckInstitutefortheStudyofSocieties.
Beckert,Jens,2009:Thesocialorderofmarkets.In:TheoryandSociety38,245-269.Beckert,Jens,2010:Howdofieldschange?Theinterrelationsofinstitutions,networks,and
cognitioninthedynamicsofmarkets.In:OrganizationStudies31,605–627.Beckert,Jens,2011a:Imaginativevalueintheeconomy.In:JensBeckertandPatrikAspers
(ed.)Theworthofgoods:Valuationandpricingintheeconomy.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,106-128.
Beckert,Jens,2011b:Wheredopricescomefrom?Sociologicalapproachestopriceformation.In:Socio-EconomicReview9,757–786.<http://ser.oxfordjournals.org/content/9/4/757.abstract>
Beckert,Jens/FrankWehinger,2011:IntheShadow:Illegalmarketsandeconomicsociology.Cologne:MaxPlanckInstitutefortheStudyofSocieties.
Beckert,Jens/FrankWehinger,2013:Intheshadow:Illegalmarketsandeconomicsociology.In:Socio-EconomicReview11,5-30.<http://ser.oxfordjournals.org/content/11/1/5.abstract>
Beech,Hannah/AlexPerry,2011:Killingfields:Africa'srhinosunderthreat.In:TIMEMagazine,32–39.
Beinart,William,2003:TheriseofconservationinSouthAfrica:Settlers,livestock,andtheenvironment,1770–1950.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
Bell,CeliaM./MoniqueS.J.Simmonds,2006:PlantsubstancesasalternativesforanimalproductsintraditionalmedicinesReporttotheUKDepartmentofEnvironmentandRuralAffairs.
Bell,Sandra/KateHampshire/StellaTopalidou,2007:Thepoliticalcultureofpoaching:AcasestudyfromnorthernGreece.In:BiodiversityandConservation16,399-418.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3371-y>
Belousov,Konstantin,etal.,2007:Anyportinastorm:Fieldworkdifficultiesindangerousandcrisis-riddensettings.In:QualitativeResearch7,155-175.<http://qrj.sagepub.com/content/7/2/155.abstract>
380
Bennett,ElizabethL.,2012:Anotherinconvenienttruth:Thefailureofenforcementsystemstosavecharismaticspecies.In:FaunaandFloraInternational45,476-479.
Bentley,Larry,29September2014:Rhinosfetchaprettyprice.In:ZululandObserver.<http://zululandobserver.co.za/48477/rhinos-fetch-a-pretty-price/>
Berger,Joel,1995:Predation,sensitivity,andsex:Whyfemaleblackrhinocerosesoutlivemales.In:BehavioralEcology6,57-64.<http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/1/57.abstract>
Berger,JoshuaHowat,2011:ApartheidechoesforevictedS.Africafarmworkers.In:AFP.<http://www.ruraldevelopment.gov.za/phocadownload/newspaper-clippings/2011/february/07022011-5.pdf>
Bestor,TheodoreC.,2001:Supply-sidesushi:Commodity,market,andtheglobalcity.In:AmericanAnthropologist103,76-95.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/683923>
Biggs,Duan,etal.,2013:LegaltradeofAfrica'srhinohorns.In:Science339,1038-1039.<http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6123/1038.short>
BishopIsidoreofSeville,[6thCenturyAD]TheEtymologiesofIsidoreofSeville,6thcenturyA.D.<https://sites.google.com/site/theetymologies/complete-text/liber-xiv>
Bless,C./C.Higson-Smith/A.Kagee,2006:Fundamentalsofsocialresearchmethods:AnAfricanperspective.CapeTown:Juta.<http://books.google.de/books?id=7aKGSIsNk-IC>
Blevins,K./T.Edwards,2009:Wildlifecrime.In:J.Miller(ed.)21stcenturycriminology.SanAntonio:SagePublications,557–564.
Bloch,Simon,13November2014:TongaatHulett:OutcryoverelephantkillingsinMozambicansugarplant.In:TheStar.<http://www.4-traders.com/TONGAAT-HULETT-LTD-1413420/news/Tongaat-Hulett--Outcry-over-elephants-killings-in-Mozambican-sugar-plant-19386715/>
Bloch,Simon,2014:Czechpolicecharge16fortradinginrhinohorn.In:BusinessDay,18December2014.<http://www.bdlive.co.za/national/science/2014/12/18/czech-police-charge-16-for-trading-in-rhino-horns>
BloombergBusiness,2015:Gold,Silver,andIndustrialMetalsPrices.<http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/futures/metals/>(28April2015).
Boeyens,JanC.A./MariaM.vanderRyst,2014:TheculturalandsymbolicsignificanceoftheAfricanrhinoceros:
Areviewofthetraditionalbeliefs,perceptionsandpracticesofagropastoralistsocietiesinsouthernAfrica.In:SouthernAfricanHumanities26,21–55.
Bollier,David,2010:Thepromiseandperilofbigdata.Washington,DC:TheAspenInstitute.<http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/The_Promise_and_Peril_of_Big_Data.pdf>
Borchert,Peter,27February2013:Timbavatirhinochallenge.In:AfricaGeography.<http://africageographic.com/blog/timbavati-rhino-challenge/>
Borchert,Peter,2012:Founder'snote.In:AfricaGeographic,4–5.Borten,Peter,2014:NiuHuang–Cow,ox,orwaterbuffalogallstone(bezoar)–"Cattle
Yellow".<http://chineseherbinfo.com/niu-huang-cow-ox-or-water-buffalo-gallstone-bezoar-cattle-yellow/>(25August2014).
Bosworth,Mary,etal.,2005:Doingprisonresearch:Viewsfrominside.In:QualitativeInquiry11,249-264.<http://qix.sagepub.com/content/11/2/249.abstract>
381
Bothma,J.duP./N.vanRooyen/M.W.vanRooyen,2004:UsingdietandplantresourcestosetwildlifestockingdensitiesinAfricansavannas.In:WildlifeSocietyBulletin32,840-851.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/3784808>
Bothma,J.duP./H.Suich/A.Spenceley,2012:ExtensivewildlifeproductiononprivtaelandinSouthAfrica.In:H.Suich/B.Child/A.Spenceley(eds.),Evolutionandinnovationinwildlifeconservation:ParksandgameranchestoTransfrontierConservationAreas.London:Earthscan,147–161.
Bourdieu,Pierre,1986:Theformsofcapital.In:J.E.Richardson(ed.)Handbookoftheoryofresearchforthesociologyofeducation.Westport:GreenwoodPress,241–258.
Bourdieu,Pierre,[2000]2005(a):Principlesofaneconomicanthropology.In:NeilSmelserandRichardSwedberg(ed.)Thehandbookofeconomicsociology.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,75-89.
Bourdieu,Pierre,2005(b):Thesocialstructuresoftheeconomy.London:PolityPress.Bowman,BlytheA.,2008:Transnationalcrimesagainstculture:Lootingatarchaeologicalsites
andthe“grey”marketinantiquities.In:JournalofContemporaryCriminalJustice24,225-242.<http://ccj.sagepub.com/content/24/3/225.abstract>
boyd,danah/KateCrawford,2012:Criticalquestionsforbigdata.In:Information,Communication&Society15,662-679.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878>
Brannick,Teresa/DavidCoghlan,2007:Indefenseofbeing“native”:Thecaseforinsideracademicresearch.In:OrganizationalResearchMethods10,59-74.<http://orm.sagepub.com/content/10/1/59.abstract>
Brantingham,PatriciaL./PaulJ.Brantingham,1993:Environment,routine,andsituation:Towardapatterntheoryofcrime.In:RonaldV.G.Clarke/MarcusFelson(eds.),Routineactivityandrationalchoice:Advancesincriminologicaltheory.NewBrunswick,NewJersey:TransactionPublishers,259–294.
Brayboy,BryanMcKinley/DonnaDeyhle,2000:Insider-Outsider:ResearchersinAmericanIndiancommunities.In:TheoryIntoPractice39,163-169.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_7>
Bretschneider,E.,1875:NotesonChinesemedievaltravellerstothewest.In:ChineseRecorder6,1–22.
Bretschneider,E.,1910:MedievalresearchesfromEasternAsiaticsources.London:KeganPaul,TrenchandTruebner
Briggs,GeorgeW.,1931:TheIndianrhinocerosasasacredanimal.In:JournaloftheAmericanOrientalSociety51,276–282
Briggs,GeorgeW.,1938:GorakhnāthandtheKānphaṭaYogīs.Calcutta:MotilalBanarsidass.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=DXPa3jZDQZUC>
Brodie,Neil,2003:Lessonsfromtheillegaltradeinillicitantiquities.In:SaraOldfield(ed.)Thetradeinwidllife:RegulationforConservation.London:Earthscan,184–195.
BrookeDarby,M.,2014:Theescalatinginternationalwildlifetraffickingcrisis:Ecological,economic,andnationalsecurityissues,BureauofInternationalNarcoticsandLawEnforcementAffairs:U.S.DepartmentofState.<http://www.state.gov/j/inl/rls/rm/2014/226421.htm>.
Brooks,Andrew,2014:Controversial,corruptandillegal:Ethicalimplicationsofinvetsigatingdifficulttopics–ReflectionsonfieldworkinsouthernAfrica.In:JennyLunn(ed.)FieldworkintheGlobalSouth.London:Routledge,34–48.
382
Brymer,RichardA.,1991:Theemergenceandmaintenanceofadeviantsub-culture:Thecaseofhunting/poachingsub-culture.In:Anthropologica33,177-194.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/25605608>
Buijs,Daan,1987:AsummaryoftheintroductionofwhiterhinoontoprivatelandintheRepulicofSouthAfrica.Johannesburg:RhinoandElephantFoundation.
Buijs,Daan,1998:WhiterhinosonprivatelandinSouthAfrica1997AfricanRhinoOwnersAssociation.
Buijs,Daan,2002:Strategicapproachtoprivaterhinocerosmanagementandinternationaltradeinrhinocerosproducts.Pretoria:UniversityofPretoria.
Buijs,Daan/JeremyAnderson,1989:WhiterhinosonprivatelandinSouthAfrica.In:RhinoandElephantFoundationJournal2,26–31.<http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/index.php?s=1&act=pdfviewer&id=1292324107&folder=129>
Buijs,Daan/TheoPapenfus,1996:WhiterhinosofprivatelandinSABulmer,Martin,2008:Theethicsofsocialresearch.In:NigelGilbert(ed.)Researchingsocial
life.London:SAGEPublications,145–162.Burawoy,Michael,1998:Theextendedcasemethod.In:SociologicalTheory16,4-33.Burt,RonaldS.,1992:Structuralholes:Thesocialstructureofcompetition.Havard:Harvard
UniversityPress.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=_gjtAAAAMAAJ>Büscher,B./V.Davidov,2013:Theecotourism-extractionnexus:Politicaleconomiesandrural
realitiesof(un)comfortablebedfellows:Taylor&Francis.<https://encrypted.google.com/books?id=eP2TAgAAQBAJ>
Büscher,Bram,2010:Seeking'telos'inthe'transfrontier'?NeoliberalismandthetranscendingofcommunityconservationinSouthernAfrica.In:EnvironmentandPlanningA42,644–660.<http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a42140>
Büscher,Bram/WolframDressler,2012:Commodityconservation:TherestructuringofcommunityconservationinSouthAfricaandthePhilippines.In:Geoforum43,367-376.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718510000862>
Büscher,Bram/WolframDressler/R.Fletcher,2014:NatureInc.:Environmentalconservationintheneoliberalage:UniversityofArizonaPress.<https://encrypted.google.com/books?id=AiwoAwAAQBAJ>
Büscher,Bram/MaanoRamutsindela,2016:Greenviolence:RhinopoachingandthewartosavesouthernAfrica'sPeaceParks.In:AfricanAffairs.
But,PaulPui-Hay/Lai–ChingLung/Yan-KitTam,1990:EthnopharmacologyofrhinocroshornI:Antipyreticeffectsofrhinoceroshornandotheranimalhorns.In:JournalofEthnopharmacology30,157–168.
But,PaulPui-Hay,Yan-KitTamandLai-ChingLung,,1991:Ethnopharmacologyofrhinoceroshorn.II:Antipyreticeffectsofprescriptionscontainingrhinoceroshornorwaterbuffalohorn.In:JournalofEthnopharmacology33,45-50.
Callon,Michel,1998:Introduction:Theembeddednessofeconomicmarketsineconomics.In:MichelCallon(ed.)Thelawsofthemarket.Oxford:Blackwell,1-57.
Cardamone,Tom,2012:Ivoryandinsecurity:TheglobalimplicationsofpoachinginAfricaGlobalFinancialIntegrity.
Carnie,Tony,2012:Fakerhinohornpushesuppriceoftherealthing.In:CapeTimes,27July2012.
Carnie,Tony,2013:Criminals'snewploytoobtainrhinohorn.In:CapeTimes,5February2013.
383
Carruthers,Jane,2006:Mapungubwe:AnhistoricalandcontemporaryanalysisofaWorldHeritageculturallandscape.In:Koedoe49,1–13.
Carruthers,Jane,1993:'Policeboys'andpoachers:Africans,wildlifeprotectionandnationalparks,theTransvaal1902to1950.In:Koedoe36,11–22.
Carruthers,Jane,1995:TheKrugerNationalPark:Asocialandpoliticalhistory.Pietermaritzburg:UniversityofNatal.
Carruthers,Jane,2008:“Wildingthefarmorfarmingthewild”?TheevolutionofscientificgameranchinginSouthAfricafromthe1960stothepresent.In:TransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyofSouthAfrica63,160-181.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00359190809519220>
Casada,J.A.,1998:Africa'sgreatesthunter:ThelostwritingsofFrederickC.Selous.LongBeach:SafariPublishers.
Castells,Manuel,1999:Grassrootingthespaceofflows.In:UrbanGeography20,294-302.<http://dx.doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.20.4.294>
Castells,Manuel,2000:Materialsforanexploratorytheoryofthenetworksociety.In:TheBritishJournalofSociology51,5-24.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00005.x>
Castells,Manuel,2011:Theriseofthenetworksociety:Theinformationage:Economy,society,andculture:Wiley.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=FihjywtjTdUC>
Castley,J.Guy/A.J.Hall–Martin,2003:Thestatusofthesouthernwhiterhinoceros(Ceratotheriumsimumsimum)onprivatelandinSouthAfricain2001.In:Pachyderm34.
Cesara,Manda,1982:Reflectionsofawomananthropologist:Nohidingplace.NewYork:AcademiaPress.
Chambers,Robert,1983:Ruraldevelopment:Puttingthelastfirst.London:Longman.Chambliss,William,1988:Onthetake:Frompettycrookstopresidents.Bloomington:Indiana
UniversityPress.Chapman,J.,1999:TheartofrhinoceroshorncarvinginChina.London:Christie'sBooks.
<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=Tb5JAQAAIAAJ>Child,Brian2012:ThesustainableuseapproachcouldsaveSouthAfrica’srhinosIn:South
AfricanJournalofScience108.Chin,Ko-lin/JamesFinckenauer,2011:Chickenheads,agents,mommies,andjockeys:The
socialorganizationoftransnationalcommercialsex.In:Crime,LawandSocialChange56,463-484.
CITES,1973:ConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFaunaandFloraCITES.Washington,D.C.<http://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/disc/E-Text.pdf>.
CITES,1992:Resolution8.3:Recognitionofthebenefitsoftradeinwildlife,CITES.CITES,1994:ResolutionConference9.14:ConservationofandtradeinAfricanandAsian
rhinoceroses,CITES.CITES,2002:Resolution12.10:RegistrationofoperationsthatbreedAppendix-Ianimalspecies
incaptivityforcommercialpurposes,CITES.<http://www.cites.org/eng/res/12/12-10R15.php>.
CITES,2004:Resolution13.5:Establishmentofexportquotasforblackrhinoceroshuntingtrophies,CITES.
CITES,2013a:Resolution16.3:CITESStrategicVision2008–2020,CITES.<http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/res/16/E-Res-16-03.pdf>.
384
CITES,2013b:Source,transitanddestinationcountriesmeettodevelopconcretestrategiesandactionstocombatthepoachingofrhinocerosandtheillegaltradeinrhinoceroshorn<http://www.cites.org/eng/news/pr/2013/20131031_rhino_task-force.php>.
CITES,2014a:Directoryofillegaltradeinrhinoceroshornfocalpoints.<http://cites.org/sites/default/files/notif/E-Notif-2014-047_0.pdf>.
CITES,2014b:ListofContractingParties,CITES.<http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/parties/chronolo.php>.
CITES,2014c:WhatisCITES.<http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/what.php>CITESRhinocerosWorkingGroup,2014:InterpretationandimplementationoftheConvention;
Speciestradeandconservation:Rhinoceroses.Geneva,Switzerland:<http://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/sc/65/E-SC65-43-01_0.pdf>
CITESSecretariat,2013:InterpretationandimplementationoftheConvention,Speciestradeandconservation:Rhinoceroses
CITESSecretariat,2014:InterpretationandimplementationoftheConvention,Speciestradeandconservation:Rhinoceroses.Geneva:
CITESTradeDatabase,2012:Exportdata:Ceratotheriumsimumsimum.<http://trade.cites.org/en/cites_trade>.
CITESTradeDatabase,2013:Exportdata:Ceratotheriumsimumsimum.<http://trade.cites.org/en/cites_trade>.
Clarke,S.,2004:SharkproducttradeinHongKongandmainlandChinaandimplementationoftheCITESsharklistingsHongKong:TRAFFICEastAsia.
Clottes,Jean,October2002:Chauvetcave(ca.30,000B.C.).<http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/chav/hd_chav.htm>.
Cock,Jacklyn/DavidFig,2000:Fromcolonialtocommunitybasedconservation:EnvironmentaljusticeandthenationalparksofSouthAfrica.In:SocietyinTransition31,22-35.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2000.10419008>
Cockington,James,2013:$4opshopsellsfor$75,000.In:TheSydneyMorningHerald,25June2013.<http://www.smh.com.au/money/investing/4-op-shop-buy-sells-for-75000-20130624-2otj4.html>
Cohen,Andrew,1997:Sturgeonpoachingandblackmarketcaviar:Acasestudy.In:VadimJ.Birstein/JohnR.Waldman/WilliamE.Bemis(eds.),SturgeonBiodiversityandConservation.SpringerNetherlands,423-426.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46854-9_32>
Collins,A./G.Fraser/J.Snowball,2013:RhinoPoaching:SupplyandDemandUncertain.In:Science340,1167-1167.<<GotoISI>://WOS:000319972800017>
Collins,Alan/GavinFraser/JenSnowball,2013:CouldaregulatedmarketapproachforrhinoceroshornsworkinSouthAfrica?Somepracticalissuesandconcerns.<http://www.essa2013.org.za/fullpaper/essa2013_2708.pdf>
Colombo,Francesca,6September2003:Animaltrafficking–Acruelbillion-Dollarbusiness.In:InterPresseServiceNewsAgency.<http://www.ipsnews.net/2003/09/environment-animal-trafficking-a-cruel-billion-dollar-business/>
Comaroff,Jean/JohnL.Comaroff,2006:Lawanddisorderinthepostcolony:Anintroduction.In:JeanComaroff/JohnL.Comaroff(eds.),Lawanddisorderinthepostcolony.Chicago:ChicagoUniversityPress.
CommissiononRestitutionofLandRights,2015:Frequentlyaskedquestionsandanswers.Pretoria:CommissiononRestitutionofLandRights,.
385
<http://www.ruraldevelopment.gov.za/component/content/article/347-land-claim/re-opening/771-faq>.
CompilationoffolktalesofMiddleEasternandIndiandescent,1850:ThesecondvoyageofSindbadtheseamanOnethousandandonenights:TheArabianNights.<http://classiclit.about.com/library/bl-etexts/arabian/bl-arabian-2sindbad.htm>
Connett,David,2014:$1mbountyofthe'PabloEscobar'ofanimaltraffickinghead:RewardtargetsVixayKeosavanginnewescalationoffightagainstthis'lucrative'crime.In:TheIndependent,19January2014.
Conrad,Kirsten,2012:Tradebans:aperfectstormforpoaching?In:TropicalConservationScience5,245-254.
Cook,Dee/MartinLowtherRoberts,Jason,2002:Theinternationalwildlifetradeandorganisedcrime:AreviewoftheevidenceandtheroleoftheUK.<http://www.wwf.org.uk/filelibrary/pdf/organisedCrime.pdf>
Copes,Heith/AndyHochstetler/AnastasiaBrown,2013:Inmates’perceptionsofthebenefitsandharmofprisoninterviews.In:FieldMethods25,182-196.<http://fmx.sagepub.com/content/25/2/182.abstract>
Corbin,Juliet/JaniceM.Morse,2003:Theunstructuredinteractiveinterview:Issuesofreciprocityandriskswhendealingwithsensitivetopics.In:QualitativeInquiry9,335-354.<http://qix.sagepub.com/content/9/3/335.abstract>
Cota-Larson,Rhishja,2013:RhinosfromSouthAfricatoChina:AtroublingtimelineAnnamiticus.<http://annamiticus.com/Reports/TroublingTimeline.pdf>
Côté-Boucher,Karine,2015:Theparadoxofdiscretion:CustomsandthechangingoccupationalidentityofCanadianborderofficers.In:BritishJournalofCriminology.<http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/04/02/bjc.azv023.abstract>
Couzens,Edmund,2003:TheinfluenceofEnglishpoachinglawsonSouthAfricanpoachinglaws.Fundamina:AJournalofLegalHistory.<http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/funda/funda_n9_a4.pdf>.
Cressey,D.,1969:Theftofthenation:ThestructureandoperationsoforganizedcrimeinAmerica.NewYork:Harper&Row.
Cromsigt,JorisP.G.M./MariskateBeest,2014:Restorationofamegaherbivore:landscape-levelimpactsofwhiterhinocerosinKrugerNationalPark,SouthAfrica.In:JournalofEcology102,566-575.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12218>
Crow,MatthewS./TaraO'ConnorShelley/PaulB.Stretesky,2013:Camouflage-collarcrime:AnexaminationofwildlifecrimeandcharacteristicsofoffendersinFlorida.In:DeviantBehavior34,635-652.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2012.759049>
Cumming,D.H.M./R.F.duToit/S.N.Stuart,1990:Africanelephantsandrhinos:Statussurveyandconservationactionplan.Gland,Switzerland:IUCN.<https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/1990-006.pdf>
Daffue,Elise,2013:Themanyfacesofrhinopoaching,StopRhinoPoaching.Pretoria:StopRhinoPoaching.
Daffue,Hendrik/EliseDaffue,2013:Rhinohornconduits–Organizedcrimelevels.Pretoria:StopRhinoPoaching.
Damm,GerhardR.,2008:Recreationaltrophyhunting:"Whatdoweknowandshouldwedo?".In:Bestpracticesinsustainablehunting,5–11.
David,Matthew/CaroleD.Sutton,2011:BeingethicalSocialresearch:Anintroduction.London:SAGEPublications,29–53.
386
DeSoto,Hernando,1989:Theotherpath.NewYork:BasicBooks,MemberofthePerseusBooksGroup.
deWet,Kobus,2013:Mastersresearchproposal:Developmentofacase-basedapproachtotheforensicexaminationofarhinocerospoachingcrimescene;DepartmentofEnvironmentalScienes:UNISA(27April2013).
Denzin,Norman,2012:Triangulation2.0.In:JournalofMixedMethodsResearch6,80-88.Denzin,Norman1970:Theresearchact:Atheoreticalintroductiontosociologicalmethods.
Piscataway,NewJersey:Transactionpublishers.DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs,30June2014:Panelofexpertsinvitesstakeholder
participationasitexploresrhinohorntradefeasibilityaspartofSouthAfrica’scomprehensiveintegratedapproachtoreducerhinopoaching.Pretoria.<https://www.environment.gov.za/mediarelease/stakeholderparticipation_rhinotrade>.
DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs,2010:ConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFaunaandFlora(CITES)Regulations.Vol.No.R.173.<https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/legislations/nemba_wildfaunaandflora_g33002rg9240gon173.pdf>.
DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs,2012:ConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFloraandFauna.PresentationmadetothePortfolioCommitteeonWaterandEnvironmentalAffairs.
DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs,2014a:MinisterEdnaMolewaleadsimplementationofintegratedmanagementofrhinocerosinSouthAfrica.Pretoria.<https://www.environment.gov.za/mediarelease/molewa_integratedstrategicmanagement_rhinoceros>.
DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs,2014b:Rhinopoachingstatisticsupdate(14May2014).Pretoria.<https://www.environment.gov.za/mediarelease/rhinopoaching_statistics_14may2014>.
DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs,2014c:SouthAfricahandsoverchairmainshipoftheGroupofLike–MindedMega–DiverseCountriestoGuatamalaintheRepublicofKorea.<https://www.environment.gov.za/mediarelease/sahandsover_lmmcchairmanship>
DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairsandTourism,2009:Governmentnoticeonnationalmoratoriumonthetradeinindividualrhinoceroshorns.No.148.<https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/gazetted_notices/nemba_memorarium_g31899gon148.pdf>.
Desmond,Matthew,2014:Relationalethnography.In:TheoryandSociety43,547-579.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9232-5>
DeutschePresseAgentur,2004:Indonesiancourtsentencesfakerhino-hornvendortojail.In:DeutschePresseAgentur,21January2004.
Dewey,Matías,2011:Fragilestates,robuststructures:IllegalpoliceprotectioninBuenosAires.Hamburg:GermanInstituteofGlobalandAreaStudies.
Dewey,Matías,2012:IllegalpoliceprotectionandthemarketforstolenvehiclesinBuenosAires.In:JournalofLatinAmericanStudies44,679-702.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X12000831>
Dewey,Matías,2014a:Crisisandtheemergenceofillicitmarkets.MPIfGDiscussionPaper.Cologne:MaxPlanckInstitutefortheStudyofSocieties(29May2014).
387
Dewey,Matías,2014b:Crisisandtheemergenceofillicitmarkets:Apragmatistviewofeconomicactionoutsidethelaw.MPIfGDiscussionPaper:MaxPlanckInstitutefortheStudyofSocieties.
DiMinin,Enrico,etal.,2014:Identificationofpoliciesforasustainablelegaltradeinrhinoceroshornbasedonpopulationprojectionandsocioeconomicmodels.In:ConservationBiology.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12412>
Dickson,Barney,2003:Whatisthegoalofregulatingwildlifetrade?Isregulationagoodwaytoachievethisgoal?In:SaraOldfield(ed.)TradeinWildlife:RegulationforConservation.London:EarthscanPublicationsLtd.,23-32.
Dickson-Swift,Virginia,etal.,2007:Doingsensitiveresearch:Whatcahllengesdoqualitativeresearchersface?In:QualitativeResearch7,327–353.
Dickson-Swift,Virginia,etal.,2009:Researchingsensitivetopics:Qualitativeresearchasemotionwork.In:QualitativeResearch9,61-79.<http://qrj.sagepub.com/content/9/1/61.abstract>
DiMaggio,PaulJ./WalterW.Powell,1983:Theironcagerevisited:Institutionalisomorphismandcollectiverationalityinorganizationalfields.In:AmericanSociologicalReview48,147-160.
ĐỗTấtLợi,1962:NhữngcâythuốcvàvịthuốcViệtNam.Hanoi,Vietnam:NhàxuấtbảnYhọc.Dolgin,Elie,2010:Bigpharmamovesfrom'blockbusters'to'nichebusters'.In:NatMed16,
837-837.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm0810-837a>Donnelly,Lynley,2013:WelfarecouldbetheGiniinthebottle.In:Mail&Guardian,10May
2013.<http://mg.co.za/article/2013-05-10-00-welfare-could-be-gini-in-the-bottle>Dorman,Russell,2014:Thepoweroftheunicorn.WellcomeCollection:Theblogforthe
incurablycurious.<http://blog.wellcomecollection.org/tag/unicorns/>.Drummond,TheHourableWilliamHenry,1875:ThelargegameandnaturalhistoryofSouth
andSouth-EastAfrica.Edinburgh:EdmonstonandDouglas.Drury,Rebecca,2009:Identifyingandunderstandingofwildconsumeranimalproductsin
Hanoi,Vietnam:Implicationsforconservationmanagement.Ph.D.,London,UnitedKingdom:UniversityCollegeLondon.
Drury,Rebecca,2011:Hungryforsuccess:UrbanconsumerdemandforwildanimalproductsinVietnam.In:ConservationandSociety9,247-257.<http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2011;volume=9;issue=3;spage=247;epage=257;aulast=Drury;type=0>
Dry,Gert,2011:Commercialwildliferanching'scontributiontoaresourceefficient,lowcarbon,pro–employmntgreeneconomy.7thInternationalWildliferanchingSymposium.Kimberley.<http://www.sawma.co.za/images/Dry_Gert_Commercial_wildlife_ranching%27s_contribution_to_a_reseource_efficient_low_carbon_pro-employment_green_economy.pdf>.
duToit,J.G.,1998:Rhinoranching:Managementmanualforownersofwhiterhinos.Onderstepoort:SAVAWildlifeGroup.
duToit,J.G.,2015:WhiterhinopopulationKrugerNationalPark.<http://lowvelder.co.za/279143/anti-poaching-experts-wants-national-statistics-on-rhino-poaching-released/>.
duToit,J.G./O.L.vanSchalkwyk,2011:HowtoimprovewildlifeproductioninSouthAfricaduToit,Raoul,2013:ResponsetopoachinginLowveld.12thSessionofAfRSGmeeting.Naro
MaruLodge,Kenya(16to23February2013).
388
Dubow,Saul,1995:ScientificracisminmodernSouthAfrica.NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.<http://books.google.ca/books?id=C4m8Vc2rWyYC>
Duffy,Rosaleen,2001:Peaceparks:Theparadoxofglobalisation.In:Geopolitics6,1-26.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650040108407715>
Duffy,Rosaleen,2014:Wagingawartosavebiodiversity:Theriseofmilitarizedconservation.In:InternationalAffairs90,819–834.
Duffy,Rosaleen/RichardH.Emslie/MichaelH.Knight,2013a:Rhinopoaching:Howdowerespond?London:UKDepartmentforInternationalDevelopment.
Duffy,Rosaleen/RichardH.Emslie/MichaelH.Knight,2013b:Rhinopoaching:Howdowerespond?
Duffy,Rosaleen/FreyaA.V.StJohn,2013:Poverty,poachingandtrafficking:Whatarethelinks?
Dutschke,Mira,2015:What'sinaname?In:AfricanIndependent.<http://www.ilisolezwe.co.za/features/whats-in-a-name-1480812>
Dzingirai,V.,etal.,2013:Ontheedgeofstateandeconomy.In:JensA.Andersson,etal.(eds.),TransfrontierConservationAreas:Peoplelivingontheedge.London:Routledge,106–122.
EconomistsatLarge,2013:Hornofcontention:Areviewofliteratureontheeconomicsoftradeinrhinohorn.Melbourne,Australia:IFAWSouthAfrica.
Edwards,Karen,2008:Rhinoceros.In:MiltonQuarterly42,290-294.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1094-348X.2008.00205_5.x>
Eliason,StephenL.,2008:Wildlifecrime:Conservationofficers'perceptionsofelusivepoachers.In:DeviantBehavior29,111-128.<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=28790919&site=ehost-live&scope=site>
Eliason,StephenL.,2011:Trophypoaching:Aroutineactivitiesperspective.In:DeviantBehavior33,72-87.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2010.548289>
Ellis,Richard,2013:Tigerboneandrhinohorn:ThedestructionofwildlifeforTraditionalChineseMedicine.Washington,D.C.:IslandPress.
Ellis,Stephen,1994:Ofelephantsandmen:PoliticsandnatureconservationinSouthAfrica.In:JournalofSouthernAfricanStudies20,53-69.
Ellis,Stephen/JanetMacGaffey,1996:Researchonsub-SaharanAfrica'sunrecordedinternationaltrade:Somemethodologicalandconceptualproblems.In:AfricanStudiesReview39,19–41.<http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/525434>
Eloff,Corné,2012:RhinopoachinginSouthAfrica:Isitalosingbattle?<http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/pdf_files/139/1395039960.pdf>
Eloff,Corné/AndrewM.Lemieux,2014:RhinopoachinginKrugerNationalPark,SouthAfrica:aligninganalysis,technologyandprevention.In:AndrewM.Lemieux(ed.)Situationalpreventionofpoaching.London:Routledge,18–43.
Emslie,R.,2008:Rhinopopulationsizesandtrends.In:Pachyderm44.Emslie,R./MartinBrooks,1999:Statussurveyandconservationactionplan:African
rhinoIUCN/SSCAfricanRhinoSpecialistGroup.<https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/1999-049.pdf>
Emslie,R.H.,etal.,2009:Guidelinesfortheinsiture-introductionandtranslocationofAfricanandAsianrhinoceros:IUCN.
389
Emslie,RichardH/TomMilliken/BibhabTalukdar,2013:AfricanandAsianrhinoceroses–Status,conservationandtradeCITESSecretariat.<https://www.rhinos.org/Assets/final-cop16-rhino-rpt.pdf>
encareporter,2016:Mozambicanvillagersmovedfurthrawayfromthebordertocurbpoaching.In:enca,8March2016.<http://www.enca.com/africa/mozambican-villagers-moved-futher-away-border-curb-poaching>
Enright,K.,2008:Rhinoceros.London:ReaktionBooks.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=BYbxAQAAQBAJ>
EnvironmentalInvestigationAgency,2015:SinCity:IllegalwildlifetradeinLaos'GoldenTriangleSpecialEconomicZone.London,UnitedKingdom:EnvironmentalInvestigationAgency.
Espeland,Wendy,2005:Thinkingaboutstandardsinqualitativeresearch.Workshoponinterdisciplinarystandardsforsystemicqualitativeresearch,MicheleLamont.Arlington,Virginia.
Ess,Charles/AoIREthicsWorkingCommittee,2002:Ethicaldecision-makingandInternetresearch:RecommendationsfromtheAoIREthicsWorkingCommitteeAssociationofInternetResearchers.<<http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf>>
Ettinghausen,Richard,1950:Theunicorn,FreerGalleryofArtOccasionalPapers.Washington:SmithsonianInstitution.
Eustace,Michael,2012:Rhinopoaching:Whatisthesolution?In:BusinessDay.Eybers,Johann,2000:CallforinquiryintoSADFgayrightsabuses.In:DieBeeld.
<http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Call-for-inquiry-into-SADF-gay-rights-abuses-20000816>
EyewitnessNews,2014:Zimbabwerhinohornstockhasweevils.<http://ewn.co.za/2014/12/23/Zimbabwe-rhino-horn-stock-has-weevils>(23December2014).
EyewitnessNews,2015:SuspectedSApoachershotdeadinZimbabwe.In:EyewitnessNews,2April2015.<http://ewn.co.za/2015/04/02/Suspected-SA-poacher-shot-dead-in-Zimbabwe?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter>
Falberg,Alisha,2013:"Thelivingaregettingrarer”:ThecausesandconsequencesoftheinternationaltradeinwhiterhinoceroshornsundertheConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpecies.In:JournalofLawandInternationalAffairs2,182-236.
Fall,Juliet,2002:Divideandrule:Constructinghumanboundariesin‘boundlessnature’.In:GeoJournal58,243-251.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B%3AGEJO.0000017955.72829.15>
Faraquhar,Clare/(withRitaDas),1999:Arefocusgroupssuitablefor'sensitive'topics?In:JennyKritzinger/RosalineBarbour(eds.),Developingfocusgroupresearch:Politics,theoryandpractice.London:SAGEPublications,47–63.
Fears,Darryl,[3January2015]2015:Beforekillingarhinocerosbull,ahunterfacesangre,deaththreats.In:TheWashingtonPost.<http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/before-killing-a-rhinoceros-bull-a-hunter-faces-anger-death-threats/2015/01/03/07601924-8a13-11e4-9e8d-0c687bc18da4_story.html>
Feely,J.M.,Blackrhino,whiterhino:What'sinaname.In:Pachyderm43,111–115.Feige,EdgarL.,1989:Theundergroundeconomies.CambridgeCambridgeUniversityPress.Felbab-Brown,Vanda,2011:Thedisappearingact:TheillicittradeinwildlifeinAsiaBrookings
Institute.
390
Felbab-Brown,Vanda,2014:Securityconsiderationsforconductingfieldworkinhighlydangerousplacesoronhighlydangeroussubjects:SocialScienceResearchCouncil.<http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2014/06/06_security_considerations_fieldwork_felbab_brown/06_security_considerations_fieldwork_felbab_brown_report.pdf>.
Fenio,KenlyGreer,2014:PoachingrhinohorninSouthAfricaandMozambique:CommunityandexpertviewsfromthetrenchesUSDepartmentofState.
Fernández-Kelly,Patricia/JonShefner,2006:Outoftheshadows:PoliticalactionandtheinformaleconomyinLatinAmerica.UniversityPark,Pennsylvania:PennsylvaniaStateUniversityPress.<http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip065/2005037090.html>
Ferreira,Sam,2013a:KrugerNationalPark'sresponsetopoaching:Lessonslearnt.11thIUCNSSCAfricanRhinoSpecialistGroup.LaikipiaCounty,Kenya(February2013).
Ferreira,Sam,2013b:AnupdateonrhinoresearchandsurveysinSANParks.Skukuza:SANParks.
Ferreira,Sam,2015:Rhinopoachinginterventions:DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs.<https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/docs/rhino_poaching_interventions.pdf>(30August2015).
Ferreira,SamM./JudithM.Botha/MeganC.Emmet,2012:Anthropogenicinfluencesonconservationvaluesofthewhiterhinoceros.In:PlosOne7.
Ferreira,SamM.,etal.,2014:RhinopopulationsestimatesinKrugerNationalPark.Skukuza,KrugerNationalPark:SANParks.
Ferreira,SamM.,etal.,2015:DisruptionofrhinodemographybypoachersmayleadtopopulationdeclinesinKrugerNationalPark,SouthAfrica.In:PlosOne10.<http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0127783>
Ferreira,SamM./MichelePfab/MichaelKnight,2014:Managementstrategiestocurbrhinopoaching:Alternativeoptionsusingacost-benefitapproach.In:SouthAfricanJournalofScience110.<http://www.sajs.co.za/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ferreira_ResearchArticle.pdf>
Fielding,Nigel/HilaryThomas,Qualitativeinterviewing.In:NigelGilbert(ed.)Researchingsociallife.LosAngeles:Sage,245–265.
Filteau,MatthewR,2012:Deterringdefiance:'Don'tgiveapoacherareasontopoach'.In:JournalofRuralCriminology1,236–255.
Findlay,Stephanie,[SAPA-AP]2014:Ramaphosarakesinmillionsforimpala.In:IndependentOnline,8September2014.<http://www.iol.co.za/new/politics/ramaphosa-rakes-in-millions-for-impala-1.1747544>
Fioramonti,Lorenzo,2014:Hownumbersruletheworld:Theuseandabuseofstatisticsinglobalpolitics.London:ZenBooks.
Fiorentini,Gianluca/SamPeltzman,1997:Theeconomicsoforganisedcrime.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=DepEk9KiKHsC>
Fischer,Anke,etal.,2013:(De)legitimisinghunting–DiscoursesoverthemoralityofhuntinginEuropeandeasternAfrica.In:LandUsePolicy32,261-270.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837712002128>
Flick,Uwe,[1998]2014:Anintroductiontoqualitativeresearch.5thedition.LosAngeles:SagePublishers.
Fligstein,Neil,2001a:Thearchitectureofmarkets.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.Fligstein,Neil,2001b:Socialskillandthetheoryoffields.In:SociologicalTheory19,105-125.
391
Fligstein,Neil/LukeDauter,2007:Thesociologyofmarkets.In:AnnualReviewofSociology33,105-128.
Forsyth,CraigJ./ThomasA.Marckese,1993:Thrillsandskills:Asociologicalanalysisofpoaching.In:DeviantBehavior14,157-172.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1993.9967935>
Foster,RobertJ.,2006:Trackingglobalization:Commoditiesandvalueinmotion.In:ChrisTilley,etal.(eds.),Handbookofmaterialculture.London:Sage,285-303.
Freitag,Amy,2012:Wordingmatters:Conservationversuspreservation.<http://www.southernfriedscience.com/?p=11746>
Friedmann,Yolan,etal.,2011:Amoratoriumonrhinohunting–somethoughtsandrecommendations:CompiledbytheEndangeredWildlifeTrustwithinputfromtheSADCRhinoManagementGroup.<http://www.peace-of-eden.co.za/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Rhino-hunting-moratorium.pdf>.
Frommer,2015:Privategamereserves.<http://www.frommers.com/destinations/kruger-national-park/268098-sthash.qW4GizRT.dpbs#ixzz3VeqyAlZn>.
Fuller,Thomas,2013:Intraffickingofwildlife,outofreachoflaw.In:NewYorkTimes,3March2013.<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/04/world/asia/notorious-figure-in-animal-smuggling-beyond-reach-in-laos.html>
Gambetta,D.,1996:TheSicilianmafia:Thebusinessofprivateprotection.Havard:HarvardUniversityPress.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=y3bv3tqWftYC>
Gambetta,Diego,1988a:Canwetrusttrust?In:DiegoGambetta(ed.)Trust:Makingandbreakingcooperativerelations.Oxford:Blackwell,213-237.
Gambetta,Diego,1988b:Mafia:Thepriceofdistrust.In:DiegoGambetta(ed.)Trust:Makingandbreakingcooperativerelations.Oxford:Blackwell,158–175.
Gambetta,Diego,2009:Codesoftheunderworld.PrincetonandOxford:PrincetonUniversityPress.
GameWarden,2014:VisitingJohnHume'srhinobreedingoperation,SouthAfrica.SafariTalk.<http://safaritalk.net/topic/13138-visiting-john-humes-rhino-breeding-operation-south-africa/>(2February2015).
Gao,Yufang/SusanG.Clark,2014:ElephantivorytradeinChina:Trendsanddrivers.In:BiologicalConservation180,23-30.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320714003371>
Geertz,Clifford,1976:ThereligionofJava.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=-SYM4PW-YAgC>
Geertz,Clifford,1978:Thebazaareconomy:Informationandsearchinpeasantmarketing.In:AmericanEconomicReview68,28-32.
George,AlexanderL./AndrewBennett,2005:Casestudiesandtheory:DevelopmentintheSocialSciences.Cambridge,Massachusetts:MITPress.
Gerring,John,2007:Casestudyresearch:Principlesandpractices.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Gibbs,Carole,etal.,2010:IntroducingConservationCriminology:TowardsInterdisciplinaryScholarshiponEnvironmentalCrimesandRisks.In:BritishJournalofCriminology50,124-144.<http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/50/1/124.abstract>
Gibbs,GrahamR.,2007:Analysingqualitativedata.London:SAGEPublications.<http://books.google.de/books?id=EfAX3YYkrdcC>
Gibson,Amelia2015:Rhino–Diet.RhinoInfo.<http://www.rhinosinfo.com/rhino-diet.html>(20August2015).
392
Gilbert,Nigel,2008:Research,theoryandmethod.In:NigelGilbert(ed.)Researchingsociallife.LosAngeles:SagePublishers,21–40.
Glaser,B./AnselmStrauss,1967:Thediscoveryofgroundedtheory:Strategiesforqualitativedataanalysis.London:WeidenfeldandNicholson.
Glazer,M.,1970:Fieldworkinahostileenvironment:AchapterinthesociologyofsociologyresearchinChile.In:F.Bonilla/M.Glazer(eds.),StudentpoliticsinChile.NewYork:BasicBooks.
Glazewski,Jan,2000:EnvironmentallawinSouthAfrica.Durban:Butterworths.Goffman,Alice,2009:OntheRun:WantedmeninaPhiladelphiaghetto.In:American
sociologicalreview74,339-357.<http://asr.sagepub.com/content/74/3/339.abstract>Goffman,Alice,2013:Ontherun:FugitivelifeinanAmericancity(Fieldworkencountersand
discoveries).Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.Goffman,Erving,[1957]1970:Thecharacteristicsoftotalinstitutions.In:AmitaiEtzioni(ed.)A
sociologicalreaderoncomplexorganizations.London:Holt,Rinehart&Winston,312–338.
Goffman,Erving,1974:Frameanalysis:Anessayontheorganizationofexperience.Boston:NortheasternUniversityPress.
Goldsmith,Andrew,2003:Fear,fumblingandfrustration:ReflectionsondoingcriminologicalfieldworkinColombia.In:CriminologyandCriminalJustice3,103-125.
Gosling,Justin/TuesdayReitano/MarkShaw,2014:Theglobalresponsetotransnationalorganizedenvironmentalcrime.Geneva:TheGlobalInitiativeagainstTransnationalOrganizedCrime.<http://www.globalinitiative.net/knowledge-bank/publications/>
Gould,Chandre,etal.,2002:ProjectCoast:Apartheid'schemicalandbiologicalwarfareprogramme.CapeTown:UnitedNationsInstituteforDisarmamentResearch<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=Nq8OwvFpVSgC>
Granovetter,Mark,1983:Thestrengthofweakties:Anetworktheoryrevisited.In:SociologicalTheory1,201-233.
Granovetter,Mark,1985:Economicactionandsocial-structure-theproblemofembeddedness.In:AmericanJournalofSociology91,481-510.
Granovetter,Mark/RichardSwedberg,2011:IntroductiontotheThirdEdition.In:MarkGranovetterandRichardSwedberg(ed.)Thesociologyofeconomiclife.Boulder,Colorado:WestviewPress,XIII–XLI.
Gray,DavidE.,2009:Researchdesign:QualitativemethodsDoingresearchintherealworld.London:SagePublications,164–198.
Greenberg,S.,2013:ThedisjuncturesoflandandagriculturalreforminSouthAfrica:Implicationsfortheagri–foodsystem.CapeTown:InstituteforPoverty,LandandAgrarianStudies,UniversityoftheWesternCape.<http://www.plaas.org.za/sites/default/files/publications-pdf/WP26Greenberg.pdf>
Grill,Bartholomäus,2015:KidappedinMozambique:Intheclutchesofrhinopoachers.In:DerSpiegel.<http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/investigation-into-rhino-poaching-turns-into-kidnapping-a-1022611.html>
Groff,Katherine/MarkAxelrod,2013:AbaselineanalysisoftransboundarypoachingincentivesinChiquibulNationalPark,Belize.In:ConservationandSociety11.<http://www.conservationandsociety.org/temp/ConservatSoc113277-3222483_085704.pdf>
Gross,KenHawkeye,1992:Drugsmuggling:Theforbiddenbook.Boulder,Colorado:PaladinPress.
393
Gupta,Rani/PriyaRamnani,2006:Microbialkeratinasesandtheirprospectiveapplications:Anoverview.In:AppliedMicrobiologyandBiotechnology70,21-33.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0239-8>
Gwin,Peter,2012:RhinoWars.In:NationalGeographic,March2012.<http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/print/2012/03/rhino-wars/gwin-text>
Hall,Ruth,2003:Farmtenure.CapeTown:SchoolofGovernment,UniversityfotheWesternCape.<http://www.plaas.org.za/sites/default/files/publications-pdf/ELARSA03.pdf>
Hall,Tim,2013:Geographiesoftheillicit:Globalizationandorganizedcrime.In:ProgressinHumanGeography37,366-385.<http://phg.sagepub.com/content/37/3/366.abstract>
Hall-Martin,A.J.,etal.,2008:Anexertofthe2008surveyofwhiterhinocero,ceratotheriumsiumsimum,onprivatelandinSouthAfrica:WWF–AfricaRhinoProgramme.
HamHoaiNhan,2013:SừngtêgiácHamHoaiNhan.<http://phnhan.vncgarden.com/2013/10/sung-te-giac.html>.
Hammersvik,Eirik/SveinungSandberg/WillyPedersen,2012:Whysmall-scalecannabisgrowersstaysmall:Fivemechanismsthatpreventsmall-scalegrowersfromgoinglargescale.In:InternationalJournalofDrugPolicy23,458-464.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395912001181>
Hanks,John,2015:OperationLockandthewaronrhinopoaching.CapeTown:PenguinBooks.Haraway,DonnaJ.,1991:Simians,cyborgsandwomen:Thereinventionofnature.London:
FreeAssociationBooks.Harken,Jeremy,2011:Transnationalcrimeinthedevelopingworld.Researchreport.
Washington:GlobalFinancialIntegrity.<http://transcrime.gfintegrity.org/>Harper,Cindy,2011:RhODISprofilingandaDNAdatabaseasatooltoprotecttherhino:
RhinoResourceCentre.<http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/pdf_files/132/1321657369.pdf>(23August2014).
Harrison,Jane/LesleyMacGibbon/MissyMorton,2001:Regimesoftrustworthiness.In:QualitativeInquiry7,323–345.
Hart,Keith,1988:Kinship,contract,andtrust:TheeconomicorganizationofmigrantsinanAfricancityslum.In:DiegoGambetta(ed.)Trust:Makingandbreakingcooperativerelations.Oxford:Blackwell,176-193.
Hart,Keith,1990:Theideaoftheeconomy:Sixmoderndissenters.In:R.FriedlandandA.F.Robertson(ed.)Beyondthemarketplace:Rethinkingeconomyandsociety.NewYork:AldinedeGruyter,137-160.
Harvey,Ross,2015:PreservingtheAfricanelephantforfuturegenerations.CapeTown:SouthAfricanInstituteofInternationalAffairs(SAIIA).
Hauck,M./N.A.Sweijd,1999:AcasestudyofabalonepoachinginSouthAfricaanditsimpactonfisheriesmanagement.In:ICESJournalofMarineScience:JournalduConseil56,1024-1032.
Hauck,Maria,1997:Crime,conservationandcommunitydevelopment:Ecologicalcriminologyandthecasestudyofabalonepoaching.UniversityofCapeTown.
Hauck,Maria,2009:Rethinkingsmall-scalefisheriescompliance:fromcriminaljusticetosocialjustice.CapeTown:UniversityofCapeTown.<http://uctscholar.uct.ac.za/PDF/90552_Hauck_PhD_Thesis_Final_2009.pdf>
Healy,Kieran,2006:Lastbestgifts:Altruismandthemarketforhumanbloodandorgans.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.
394
Hearne,John/MargaretMcKenzie,2000:CompellingreasonsforgameranchinginMaputaland.In:HerbertH.T.Prins/JanGeuGrootenhuis/ThomasT.Dolan(eds.),WildlifeConservationbySustainableUse.SpringerNetherlands,417-438.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4012-6_19>
Helliker,Kirk,2013:ReproducingwhitecommercialagricultureinSouthAfrica;SociologyDepartment.Grahamstown:RhodesUniversity.
Herbig,FriedoJ.W./GregWarchol,2011:SouthAfricanconservationcrimeandroutineactivitiestheory:Acausalnexus.In:ActaCriminologica24.
Heyman,JosiahMcC,2013:Thestudyofillegalityandlegality:Whichwayforward?In:PoLAR:PoliticalandLegalAnthropologyReview36,304-307.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/plar.12030>
Heyman,JosiahMcConnell/AlanSmart,1999:Statesandillegalpractices:Anoverview.In:JosiahMcConnellHeyman(ed.)Statesandillegalpractices.Oxford:Berg
Hieronymus,TobinL./LawrenceM.Witmer/RyanC.Ridgely,2006:Structureofwhiterhinoceros(Ceratotheriumsimum)horninvestigatedbyX-raycomputedtomographyandhistologywithimplicationsforgrowthandexternalform.In:JournalofMorphology267,1172-1176.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10465>
HindustanTimes,2013:CIAAsmellsratasseizedrhinohornsturningouttobefake.In:HindustanTimes,9June2013.
Hirth,Friedrich,1885:ChinaandtheRomanOrient.Chicago:AresPublishers.Hopkinson,Lisa/MariusvanStaden/JeremyRidl,2008:Nationalandinternationallaw.In:R.J.
ScholesandK.G.Mennell(ed.)Elephantmanagement:AscientificassessmentofSouthAfrica.Johannesburg:WitwatersrandUniversityPress.<http://www.elephantassessment.co.za/>
Hornaday,W.T.,[1922]1979:Themindsandmannersofwildanimals.NewYork:MittalPublications.
Hornberger,Julia,2010:Onfakegoodsandfakecops.Inthebusinessofsecuringthecopy.Hornsby,Rob/DickHobbs,2007:Azoneofambiguity:Thepoliticaleconomyofcigarette
bootlegging.In:BritishJournalofCriminology47,551–571.<http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/47/4/551.abstract>
Hosken,Graeme/SAPA,2012:Fakerhinohornsfoundaftercrash;foursuspectedconartistsheldafterhidingthe'bloodied'itemsincoolerbox.In:PretoriaNews,2March2012.
Huang,K.C.,1998:ThepharmacologyofChineseherbs.Secondedition.BocaRaton:Taylor&Francis.<http://books.google.de/books?id=xKGxTcF8u-sC>
Huang,Lixin2011:StatementopposingtheuseofrhinohorninmedicinesbytheAmericanCollegeofTraditionalChineseMedicineandCouncilofCollegesofAcupunctureandOrientalMedicine.
Hübschle,Annette,2008:Drugmules:Pawnsintheinternationalnarcoticstrade.ISSToday.<http://www.issafrica.org/iss-today/drug-mules-pawns-in-the-international-narcotics-trade>.
Hübschle,Annette,2010:OrganisedcrimeinSouthernAfrica.Pretoria,SouthAfrica:InstituteforSecurityStudies.
Hübschle,Annette,2010-2011:ResearchintoorganizedcrimeinSouthernAfrica;OrganizedCrimeandMoneyLaunderingProgramme.CapeTown:InstituteforSecurityStudies.
Hübschle,Annette,2014:Ofbogushunters,queenpinsandmules:ThevariedrolesofwomenintransnationalorganizedcrimeinSouthernAfrica.In:TrendsinOrganizedCrime17,31-51.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12117-013-9202-8>
395
Hübschle,Annette/ElrenaVanderSpuy,2012:OrganizedcrimeandlawenforcementinSouthernAfrica:Thechallengesconfrontingresearch.In:SADCLawJournal2.
Huffman,T.N.,2007:HandbooktotheIronAge:Thearchaeologyofpre-colonialfarmingsocietiesinsouthernAfrica.Scottsville:UniversityofKwaZulu-NatalPress.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=BikSAQAAIAAJ>
HumanRightsWatch,2011:Ripewithabuse:HumanrightsconditionsinSouthAfrica'sfruitandwineindustries.NewYork:HumanRightsWatch.<http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/safarm0811webwcover.pdf>
Humphreys,Jasper/M.L.R.Smith,2014:The‘rhinofication’ofSouthAfricansecurity.In:InternationalAffairs90,795-818.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12141>
Hunter,Jackie/SusieStephens,2010:Isopeninnovationthewayforwardforbigpharma?In:NatRevDrugDiscov9,87-88.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd3099>
Hutton,Jon/BarnabasDickson,2000a:Endangeredspecies,threatenedconvention:Thepast,presentandfutureofCITES,theConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFloraandFauna.London:Earthscan.
Hutton,Jon/BarnabasDickson,2000b:Introduction.In:JonHutton/BarnabasDickson(eds.),Endangeredspeciesthreatenedconvention:Thepast,presentandfutureofCITES,theConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFloraandFauna.London:Earthscan,XV–XX.
Huxley,Chris,2000:CITES:TheVision.In:JonHutton/BarnabasDickson(eds.),EndangeredSpeciesthreatenedconvention:Thepast,presentandfutureofCITES,theConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFaunaandFlora.London:EarthscanPublicationsLtd.,3–12.
Ingram,Darcy,2009:"Autempsetdanslesquantitésquiluiplaisent":Poachers,Outlaws,andRuralBanditryinQuebec.In:Histoiresociale/Socialhistory42,1-34.
InstituteforSecurityStudies,2009–2010:AnnualreviewoforganizedcrimeinsouthernAfrica.Unpublishedresearchreport.
InternationalSociologicalAssociation,2001:Codeofethics.<http://www.isa-sociology.org/about/isa_code_of_ethics.htm>.
IpsosMarketing,2013:ConsumerresearchonrhinohornusageinVietnam.HoChiMinhCity:WWFTRAFFIC.
ITNewsAfrica,2014:Movitelnamedfastest-growingtelcoinAfrica.In:ITNewsAfrica,10October2014.<http://www.itnewsafrica.com/2014/10/movitel-named-fastest-growing-telco-in-africa/>
IUCN,2000:TheWorldConservationUnionontheEffectivenessofTradeMeasuresContainedinTheConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFaunaandFlora(CITES)IUCN.
IUCN,2012a:Ceratotheriumsimum.<http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/4185/0>(20May2014).
IUCN,2012b:Dicerosbicornis.<http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/6557/0>(20May2014).IUCNStandardsandPetitionsSubcommittee,2010:GuidelinesforUsingtheIUCNRedList
CategoriesandCriteria.Version8.1,PreparedbytheStandardsandPetitionsSubcommitteeinMarch2010.<http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/RedList/RedListGuidelines.pdf>(18April2012).
396
Jacobs,Bruce,1998:Researchingcrackdealers:Dilemmasandcontradictions.In:JeffFerrell/MarkHamm(eds.),EthnographyattheEdge.Boston:NorthernUniversityPress,160-177.
Jacobs,BruceA.,1999:Dealingcrack:Thesocialworldofstreetcornerselling.Lebanon,NewHampshire:NortheasternUniversityPress.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=gIfDZ7Mx08oC>
Jacobs,BruceA.,2006:Thecasefordangerousfieldwork.In:D.Hobbs/R.E.Wright(eds.),TheSagehandbookoffieldwork.NewYork:Sage,157-168.
Jacoby,K.,2003:Crimesagainstnature:Squatters,poachers,thieves,andthehiddenhistoryofAmericanconservation:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.<https://encrypted.google.com/books?id=S_bO4-02aNUC>
Jacques,Scott/RichardWright,2008:Intimacywithoutlaws:Theroleofrelationaldistanceinrecruiting,paying,andinterviewingunderworldresearchparticipants.In:JournalofResearchinCrimeandDelinquency45,22-38.
Jenkins,Jerry,1988:Beyondtheinformalsector.SanFrancisco:InstituteforContemporaryStudiesPress.
Jenyns,S.,1954:TheChineserhinocerosandChinesecarvingsinrhinoceroshorns.In:TransactionsoftheOrientalCeramicSociety29,15–26.
Jones,BrianT.B.,1999:Policylessonsfromtheevolutionofacommunity-basedapproachtowildlifemanagement,KuneneRegion,Namibia.In:JournalofInternationalDevelopment11,295–304.
Jones,BryanD.,1999:Boundedrationality.In:Annualreviewofpoliticalscience2,297-321.Jones,Jonathan,2015:Apictureofloneliness:Youarelookingatthelastmalenorthernwhite
rhino.In:TheGuardian.<http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/may/12/last-male-northern-white-rhino>
Jones,Pelham,2014:Rhinosonprivateland,emailcorrespondence.Jooste,Johan,2012:Supportingaffidavit.000089,DirectorateforPriorityCrimeInvestigations
(22March2012).Joubert,Dereck,2015:DereckJoubertrespondstoeconomicsofhunting.In:Africa
Geographic.<http://africageographic.com/blog/dereck-joubert-responds-to-a-hunter-on-the-economics-of-hunting/>
Justus,James,etal.,2009:Buyingintoconservation:Intrinsicversusinstrumentalvalue.In:TrendsinEcology&Evolution24,187-191.
Kahler,JessicaS./MeredithL.Gore,2012:Beyondthecookingpotandpocketbook:Factorsinfluencingnon-compliancewithwildlifepoachingrules.In:InternationalJournalofComparativeandAppliedCriminalJustice36,103-120.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2012.669913>
Kahler,JessicaS./MeredithL.Gore,2015:Localperceptionsofriskassociatedwithpoachingofwildlifeimplicatedinhuman-wildlifeconflictsinNamibia.In:BiologicalConservation.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320715000567>
Kaplan,Robert,2004:Treatmentofhomosexualityduringapartheid.In:BritishMedicalJournal329,7480.<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC535952/>
Kaptchuk,TedJ.,2002:Theplaceboeffectinalternativemedicine:Cantheperformanceofahealingritualhaveclinicalsignificance?In:Annalsofinternalmedicine136,817–825.
Katz,J.,1988:Seductionsofcrime.NewYork:BasicBooks.
397
Keller,Otto,1909:Nashorn(Rhinocerosindicusunicornis;Rhinocerosafricanusbicornis)DieantikeTierwelt.Leipzig:WilhelmEngelmann,383–389.
Kenney,Michael,2007:Thearchitectureofdrugtrafficking:NetworkformsoforganisationintheColombiancocainetrade.In:GlobalCrime8,233-259.
Kerry,John,2013:Firstrewardofferfortransnatinalorganizedcrime.Washington,DC:U.S.DepartmentofState.<http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2013/11/217558.htm>.
Khan,Samia/RobertVanWynsberghe,2008:Cultivatingtheunder-mined:Cross-caseanalysisasknowledgemobilization.In:Forum:QualitativeSocialResearch9.<http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/334/730>
Kisling,V.N.,2000:Zooandaquariumhistory:Ancientanimalcollectionstozoologicalgardens.London:CRCPress.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=dxTrR5nOE0UC>
Kitzinger,Jenny/RosalineBarbour,1999:Introduction:Thechallengeandpromiseoffocusgroups.In:JennyKitzinger/RosalineBarbour(eds.),Developingfocusgroupresearch:Politics,theoryandpractice.London:SAGEPublications,1–20.
Kleiner,F.,2009:Gardner'sartthroughtheages:Thewesternperspective.Boston:WadsworthCengageLearning.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=mBrvazPDFoYC>
Kloppers,RoelofJ.,2005:Bordercrossings:LifeintheMozambique/SouthAfricaborderlandsince1975.UniversityofPretoria.<http://www.repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/28053>
Knight,M.H.,etal.,2015:Biodiversityplanforthewhiterhinoceros(Ceratotheriumsimum),DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs.Pretoria,SouthAfrica:MinisterofEnvironmentalAffairs.
Knight,Michael/AfricanRhinoSpecialistGroup,2013:DallasSafariClubAuctionofapermittohuntaNamibianblackrhino.OpenLetter.PortElizabeth:AfricanRhinoSpecialistGroup.<4March2015>
Koen,Hildegarde,etal.,2014:Aframeworkforinferringpredictivedistributionsofrhinopoachingeventsthroughcausalmodelling.Pretoria:CouncilforScientificandIndustrialResearch.
Kopytoff,Igor,1986:Theculturalbiographyofthings:Commoditizationasprocess.In:ArjunAppadurai(ed.)Thesociallifeofthings:Commoditiesinculturalperspective.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,70-73.
Krug,Wolfgang,2001:PrivatesupplyofprotectedlandinsouthernAfrica:Areviewofmarkets,approaches,barriersandissues.WorldBank/OECDInternationalWorkshoponMarketCreationforBiodiversityProductsandServices.Paris.
Krüger,Johan/JohnHume,2015:Consolidatedheadsofarguments.CaseNo:57221/12,HighCourtofSouthAfrica.Johannesburg:GautengLocalDivision.
KrugerNationalPark,2009:HuntingcanhelpprotectwildlifeinSouthAfrica.KrugerNationalPark,2015:GreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark.
<http://www.krugerpark.co.za/great-limpopo-transfrontier-park-south-africa.html>.Krumer-Nevo,Michal/MiritSidi,2012:Writingagainstothering.In:QualitativeInquiry18,
299-309.<http://qix.sagepub.com/content/18/4/299.abstract>Kumleben,ME,1996:ReportoftheChairmanCommissionofInquiryintothealleged
smugglingofandillegaltradeinivoryandrhinoceroshorninSouthAfrica.CapeTown,SouthAfrica:Hansard.
398
Kvale,Steinar/SteinarBrinkmann,2009:InterViews:Learningthecraftofqualitativeresearchinterviewing.3rdedition.LosAngeles:SagePublications.<http://books.google.de/books?id=bZGvwsP1BRwC>
Kvinta,Paul,2014:Themadnessofmodern-daypoaching.In:OustideLiveBravely.<http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/nature/Hornswoggled.html>
Laburn,HelenP./DuncanMitchell,1997:Extractsofrhinoceroshornarenotantipyreticinrabbits.In:JournalofBasicandClinicalPhysiology8,1–11.
Lancaster,Lisa,2014:DocrimelevelsspikeinSouthAfricaoverthefestiveseason.AfricaCheck.<http://africacheck.org/2014/12/17/analysis-do-crime-levels-spike-in-south-africa-over-the-festive-season/>(21April2015).
Langholz,Jeffrey/GrahamI.H.Kerley,2006:Combiningconservationanddevelopmentonprivatelands:Anassessmentofecotourism-basedprivategamereservesintheEasternCape.PortElizabeth:CenterforAricanConservationEcology,NelsonMandelaMetropolitanUniversity.
Latour,Bruno,1993:ThepasteurizationofFrance.Havard:HarvardUniversityPress.Laufer,Berthold,1914:Chineseclayfigurespart1:Prolegomenaonthehistoryofdefensive
armour.In:PublicationsoftheFieldMuseumofNaturalHistory.AnthropologicalSeries13,73–315.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/29782143>
Lavers,C.,2009:Thenaturalhistoryofunicorns:HarperCollins.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=GzMtZjql37oC>
Lavorgna,Anita,2014:WildlifetraffickingintheInternetage.In:CrimeScience3,1-12.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40163-014-0005-2>
Lawhon,M./C.Herrick/S.Daya,2014:ResearchingsensitivetopicsinAfricancities:reflectionsonalcoholresearchinCapeTown.In:SouthAfricanGeographicalJournal96,15-30.
Lawrence,ThomasB./NelsonPhillips,2004:FromMobyDicktoFreeWilly:Macro-culturaldiscourseandinstitutionalentrepreneurshipinemerginginstitutionalfields.In:Organization11,689-711.
LAWSA,2014a:Wideclassification.LAWSAVolume1(electronicallyupdated).LAWSA,2014b:Wildanimals.LAWSAVolume1(electronicallyupdated)(20November2014).Layne,Elizabeth,1973:EightynationswriteMagnaCartaforWildlife.In:AudubonMagazine
3,79–102.Leader-Williams,N.,etal.,2005:Trophyhuntingofblackrhinodicerosbicornis:Proposalsto
ensureitsfuturesustainability.In:JournalofInternationalWildlifeLaw&Policy8,1-11.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13880290590913705>
Leader-Williams,Nigel,2003:Regulationandprotection:Successesandfailuresinrhinocerosconservation”.In:SaraOldfield(ed.)Thetradeinwildlife:Regulationforconservation.London:EarthscanPublicationsLtd.
LegalBrief,2014:SANParksandSAPSunderfireinanti-poachingfight.SundayTimes.SouthAfrica.<http://legalbrief.co.za/story/sanparks-and-saps-under-fire-in-anti-rhino-poaching-fight/>(3February2015).
Legodi,J,2015:InthematterbetweenKrügerJohan,HumeJohnandTheMinisterofWaterandEnvironmentalAffairs,WildlifeRanchingSouthAfrica,ThePrivateRhinoOwnersAssociation.CaseNo:57221/12,HighCourtofSouthAfrica.Pretoria,GautengDivision.
Lehmann,David,etal.,2013:DietaryplasticityofgeneralistandspecialistungulatesintheNamibiandesert:Atableisotopesapproach.In:PlosOne8,e72190.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0072190>
399
Lemieux,A.M./R.V.Clarke,2009:TheinternationalbanonivorysalesanditseffectsonelephantpoachinginAfrica.In:BritishJournalofCriminology49,451–471.
Lester,Matthew,2014:AgriclandswitchedtogamefarmingcomingbacktobiteSA.<http://www.ru.ac.za/businessschool/latestnews/agriclandswitchedtogamefarmingcomingbacktobitesa.html>.
Levey,AdrianandScott-Clark,Cathy,2007:PoachingforBinLaden.In:TheGuardian.<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/may/05/terrorism.animalwelfare>
Levi,Michael,2009:McMafia:Crimewithoutfrontiers.In:TrendsinOrganizedCrime12,78-80.
Liebling,Alison,2001:Whosesideareweon?Theory,practiceandallegiancesinprisonsresearch.In:BritishJournalofCriminology41,472–484.
Liebling,Alison,2014:Postscript:Integrityandemotioninprisonsresearch.In:QualitativeInquiry20,481-486.<http://qix.sagepub.com/content/20/4/481.abstract>
Lindelauf,Roy/PeterBorm/HerbertHamers,2009:Theinfluenceofsecrecyonthecommunicationstructureofcovertnetworks.In:SocialNetworks31,126-137.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873309000021>
Lindsey,P.A./P.A.Roulet/S.S.Romañach,2007:Economicandconservationsignificanceofthetrophyhuntingindustryinsub-SaharanAfrica.In:BiologicalConservation134,455-469.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320706003831>
Lindsey,P.,etal.,2012:PossiblerelationshipsbetweentheSouthAfricancaptive–bredhuntingindustryandthehuntingandconservationoflionselsewhereinAfrica.In:SouthAfricanJournalofWildlifeResearch42,11–22.
Lindsey,PeterA.,2008:TrophyhuntinginSub-SaharanAfrica:Economicscaleandconservationsignificance.In:Bestpracticesinsustainablehunting.<ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/aj114e/aj114e09.pdf>
Lo,T.Wing,2010:Beyondsocialcapital:TriadorganizedcrimeinHongKongandChina.In:BritishJournalofCriminology50,851-872.<http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/50/5/851.abstract>
Lombardo,RobertM.,2013:TheChicagooutfit:Alienconspiracyormachinepolitics?In:JournalofContemporaryCriminalJustice29,233-255.<http://ccj.sagepub.com/content/29/2/233.abstract>
LongHuiCorporation,2006:Shavingaliverhinohorntechnologyandrhinohornbiologicalmedicineindustrializationproject.Beijing:LongHui.<http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/index.php?s=1&act=pdfviewer&id=1331457374&folder=133>.
Lopes,AdrianA.,2014:CivilunrestandthepoachingofrhinosintheKazirangaNationalPark,India.In:EcologicalEconomics103,20-28.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800914001153>
Lorenzen,ElineD.,etal.,2011:Species-specificresponsesofLateQuaternarymegafaunatoclimateandhumans.In:Nature479,359–364.
Lubnet,Steven,2015:Ethicsontherun.In:TheNewRamble.<http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run>
Lunstrum,Elizabeth,2010:Reconstructinghistory,groundingclaimstospace:History,memory,anddisplacementintheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark.In:SouthAfricanGeographicalJournal92,129-143.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2010.530062>
400
Lunstrum,Elizabeth,2013:Articulatedsovereignty:ExtendingMozambicanstatepowerthroughtheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark.In:PoliticalGeography36,1-11.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629813000413>
Lunstrum,Elizabeth,2014:GreenMilitarization:Anti-poachingeffortsandthespatialcontoursofKrugerNationalPark.In:AnnalsoftheAssociationofAmericanGeographers,1-17.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.912545>
LusakaAgreementonCo–operativeEnforcementOperationsDirectedatIllegalTradeinWildFaunaandFlora,2014:TheLusakaAgreementTaskForce.<http://lusakaagreement.org/?page_id=24>
Luske,BodinaL.,etal.,2009:Impactoftheblackrhinoceros(Dicerosbicornisminor)onalocalpopulationofEuphorbiabothaeintheGreatFishRiverReserve,SouthAfrica.In:AfricanJournalofEcology47,509-517.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.00973.x>
Lynch,MichaelJ./PaulB.Stretesky,2011:Similaritiesbetweengreencriminologyandgreenscience:Towardatypologyofgreencriminology.In:InternationalJournalofComparativeandAppliedCriminalJustice35,293-306.
Mabunda,Lazaro,2012:“OsagentesenvolvidossãodesertoresdasfileirasdaGuardaFronteira”.In:OPaís.
MacCoun,R.,1996:Assessingalternativedrugcontrolregimes.In:JournalofPolicyAnalysisandManagement15,330-352.
MacKenzie,DonaldandYuvalMillo,2003:Constructingamarket,performingTheory:Thehistoricalsociologyofafinancialderivativesexchange.In:AmericanJournalofSociology109,107-145.
Mackenzie,JohnM.,1988:Theempireofnature:Hunting,conservationandBritishimperialism.Manchester:ManchesterUniversityPress.
MacKenzie,Penny,1998:TheSANDF:Conservationorcontamination.In:J.Cock/P.MacKenzie/InternationalDevelopmentResearchCentre(eds.),Fromdefencetodevelopment:RedirectingmilitaryresourcesinSouthAfrica.Ottawa:NewAfricaBooks.<http://books.google.de/books?id=2ojN_M7HiZsC>
Mackenzie,Simon/TessDavis,2014:TemplelootinginCambodia:Anatomyofastatuetraffickingnetwork.In:BritishJournalofCriminology.<http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/06/13/bjc.azu038.abstract>
MacLeod,Fiona,7November2014:Kruger'srhinopoaching'highway'.Oxpeckers.<http://oxpeckers.org/2014/11/krugers-rhino-poaching-highway/>
MacLeod,Fiona,9September2014:Krugerrhinosalescanned.In:OxpeckersEnvironmentalJournalism.<http://www.tourismupdate.co.za/home/detail?articleId=73793&useOldId=true>
Magome,Hector/J.Murombedzi,2012:SharingSouthAfricannationalparks:CommunitylandandconservationinademocraticSouthAfrica.In:W.M.Adams/M.Mulligan(eds.),Decolonizingnature:Strategiesforconservationinapost-colonialera.London:EarthscanLLC,108–134.<http://books.google.de/books?id=30Yefk9aIL8C>
Malinowski,B./M.W.Young,1979:TheethnographyofMalinowski:TheTrobriandIslands1915–18.London:Routledge&KeganPaul.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=RNQ9AAAAIAAJ>
Malone,Susan,2003:Ethicsathome:Informedconsentinyourownbackyard.In:InternationalJournalofQualitativeStudiesinEducation16,797–815.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518390310001632153>
401
Mandela,Nelson,2013AtributetoNelsonMandelaNelson–hisvision,legacy&challenge.(publisheduponhispassing).<http://www.wildernessfoundation.org.uk/2013/12/11/tribute-nelson-mandela/>.
Marcus,GeorgeE.,1995:Ethnographyin/oftheworldsystem:Theemergenceofmulti-sitedethnography.In:AnnualReviewofAnthropology24,95-117.
Marcus,GeorgeE.,1999:Whatisatstake–andisnot–intheideaandpracticeofmulti-sitedethnography.In:Canberraanthropology22,6-14.
Martin,E.B./C.Martin/M.Amin,1982:Run,rhino,run.London:Chatto&Windus.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=60NIAQAAIAAJ>
Martin,EsmondB./LucyVigne/CrawfordAllan,1997:Onaknife'sedge:TherhinoceroshorntradeinYemenTRAFFICInternational.
Martin,R.B.,2012:Alegaltradeinrhinohorn:Hobson'schoice.Paperpresentedatonferenceon.<http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/pdf_files/133/1331766338.pdf>
Martin,R.B.,2000:CITESandtheCBD.In:JonHutton/BarnabasDickson(eds.),Endangeredspeciesthreatenedconvention:Thepast,presentandfutureofCITES,theConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFaunaandFlora.London:Earthscan125–133.
Marx,Karl,[1867]2015:Capital:Acritiqueofpoliticaleconomy,Volume1.Vol.I.FirstEnglisheditionof1887.Moscow:ProgressPublishers.<https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf>
Mason,CharlesF./ErwinH.Bulte/RichardD.Horan,2012:Bankingonextinction:endangeredspeciesandspeculation.In:OxfordReviewofEconomicPolicy28,180-192.
Massé,Francis/ElizabethLunstrum,2016:Accumulationbysecuritization:Commercialpoaching,neoliberalconservation,andthecreationofnewwildlifefrontiers.In:Geoforum69,227-237.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671851500069X>
Mathews,Gordon,2011:Ghettoatthecenteroftheworld:ChungkingMansions,HongKong.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.
MaxPlanckSociety,2001:VerantwortlichesHandelninderWissenschaft:AnalysenundEmpfehlungen.München:MaxPlanckSociety.
MaxPlanckSociety,2010:GuidelinesandrulesoftheMaxPlanckSocietyonaresponsibleapproachtofreedomofresearchandresearchrisks,SenateoftheMaxPlanckSociety.<http://www.mpg.de/229644/Research_freedom>.
Maykut,Pamela/RichardMorehouse,1994:Beginningqualitativeresearchers:Aphilosophicalandpracticalguide.Washington,DC:Falmer.
McCall,GeorgeJ.,2006:Thefieldworktradition.In:DickHobbs/RichardWright(eds.),TheSagehandbookoffieldwork.London:SagePublications,3–22.
McCoy,AlfredW.,[1972]2003:Thepoliticsofheroin:CIAcomplicityintheglobaldrugtrade.Revisededition.Chicago:LawrenceHillBooks.
McCracken,D.P.,2008:SavingtheZululandWilderness:Anearlystrugglefornatureconservation.CapeTown:Jacana.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=3Tc9AQAAIAAJ>
McFee,Kathleen,1999:Sellingnaturetosaveit?Biodiversityandgreendevelopmentalism.In:EnvironmentandPlanningD:SocietyandSpace17,133–154.
McKie,Linda/LouiseRyan,2012:Exploringtrendsandchallengesinsociologicalresearch.In:Sociology46,1-7.<http://soc.sagepub.com/content/46/6/1.abstract>
402
Merton,RobertK.,1972:Insidersandoutsiders:Achapterinthesociologyofknowledge.In:AmericanJournalofSociology78,9-47.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776569>
Meskell,Lynn,2012:Thenatureofheritage:ThenewSouthAfrica.Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.Michell,Lynn,1999:Combiningfocusgroupsandinterviews:Tellinghowitis;tellinghowit
feels.In:JennyKitzinger/RosalineBarbour(eds.),Developingfocusgroups:Politics,theoryandpractice.London:SAGEPublications,36–46.
Mikecz,Robert,2012:Interviewingelites:Addressingmethodologicalissues.In:QualitativeInquiry18,482-493.<http://qix.sagepub.com/content/18/6/482.abstract>
Miles,MatthewB./A.MichaelHuberman,1994:Qualitativedataanalysis.2ndedition.ThousandOaks:SagePublications.
Milgroom,Jessica/MarjaSpierenburg,2008:Inducedvolition:ResettlementfromtheLimpopoNationalPark,Mozambique.In:JournalofContemporaryAfricanStudies26,435-448.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02589000802482021>
Milledge,S.A.H.,2007:IllegalkillingofAfricanrhinosandhorntrade,2000-2005:Theeraofresurgentmarketsandemergingorganizedcrime.In:Pachyderm,96-107.
Miller,Jody,2005:Thestatusofqualitativeresearchincriminology.Workshoponinterdisciplinarystandardsforsystemicqualitativeresearch,MicheleLamont.Arlington,Virginia.
Milliken,T./R.H.Emslie/B.Talukdar,2009:AfricanandAsianrhinoceroses–Status,conservationandtrade.Geneva,Switzerland:CITESSecretariat.
Milliken,Tom,2014:Illegaltradeinivoryandrhinohorn:AnassessmentreporttoimprovelawenforcementundertheWildlifeTRAPSProjectUSAIDandTRAFFIC.
Milliken,Tom,etal.,1993:ThedeclineoftheblackrhinoinZimbabwe:Implicationsforfuturerhinoconservation.Cambridge:TRAFFICInternational.
Milliken,Tom/JoShaw,2012:TheSouthAfrica-VietNamrhinohorntradenexus:Adeadlycombinationofinstitutionallapses,corruptwildlifeindustryprofessionalsandAsiancrimesyndicates.Johannesburg,SouthAfrica:TRAFFIC.
Mintz,Sidney,1985:Sweetnessandpower:Theplaceofsugarinmodernhistory.NewYork:Pengum.
Mngoma,Nosipho,16May2013:Cashboosttohelpsaverhinos.In:IOLDailyNews.<http://www.iol.co.za/dailynews/news/cash-boost-to-help-to-save-rhinos-1.1516724-.UZTjkrW-2So>
Mofson,Phyllis,2000:ZimbabweandCITES:Influencingtheinternationalregime.In:JonHutton/BarnabasDickson(eds.),EndangeredSpeciesthreatenedconvention:Thepast,presentandfutureofCITES,theConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFaunaandFlora.London:EarthscanPublicationsLtd,107–122.
Molewa,Edna,2011:QuestionNo.2464forwrittenreply:NationalAssembly,NationalAssemblyofSouthAfrica.CapeTown:HANSARD.
Molewa,Edna,2012a:InternalquestionNo.21NW2325E,NationalAssemblyofSouthAfrica.CapeTown:HANSARD.<https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/question1936_exportation_of_rhinos_to_vietnam.pdf>.
Molewa,Edna,2012b:InternalquestionpaperNo.9NW1067E,NationalAssemblyofSouthAfrica.CapeTown:HANSARD.<https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/question889.pdf>.
Molewa,Edna,2014:ParliamentaryquestionNo.786NW873E,NationalAssemblyofSouthAfrica.CapeTown:HANSARD.
403
<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71654/page71651?oid=689074&sn=Detail&pid=71651>.
Molewa,Edna,2015:MinisterEdnaMolewahighlightsprogressinthewaragainstpoaching.Pretoria,SouthAfrica:DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs.<https://www.environment.gov.za/mediarelease/molewa_onwaragainstpoaching>(10May2015).
Molewa,Edna,2016:MinisterEdnaMolewahighlightsprogressinthefightagainstrhinopoaching.Pretoria:DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs(21January2016).
Momberg,Elanor,2009:Poachersplaydirtytogetwhattheywant.In:IndependentOnline.<http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/poachers-play-dirty-to-get-what-they-want-1.450221>
Montesh,Moses,2013:Rhinopoaching:Anewformoforganisedcrime:UNISA.<http://www.unisa.ac.za/claw/news/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/rhion-poaching-for-profit.pdf>(20May2014).
Moreto,WilliamD./RonaldV.Clarke,2014:Scriptanalysisofthetransnationalillegalmarketinendangeredspecies:Dreamandreality.In:BenoitLeclerc/RichardWortley(eds.),Cognitionandcrime:Offenderdecisionmakingandscriptanalyses.London:Routledge,209–220.
Moreto,WilliamD.,etal.,2014:LawenforcementmonitoringinUganda:Theutilityofofficialdataandtime/distance-basedrangerefficiencymeasures.In:A.M.Lemieux(ed.)SituationalpreventionofpoachingOxford:Routledge,82–101.
Morselli,Carlo,2001:StructuringMr.Nice:Entrepreneurialopportunitiesandbrokeragepositioninginthecannabistrade.In:Crime,LawandSocialChange35,203-244.
Morselli,Carlo,2008:InsideCriminalNetworks:Springer.<https://encrypted.google.com/books?id=g1gsQXALksUC>
Morselli,Carlo/CynthiaGiguère/KatiaPetit,2007:Theefficiency/securitytrade-offincriminalnetworks.In:SocialNetworks29,143-153.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873306000268>
Mould,R.F.,1996:Mould'smedicalanecdotes:Omnibusedition.NewYork:Taylor&Francis.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=ag6OunNxHrMC>
Mouton,Hildegarde/JPdeVilliers,2012:Aprologuetoestimatingtheintentofapotentialrhinopoacher.Pretoria:CouncilforScientificandIndustrialResearch.<http://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/bitstream/10204/6384/1/Mouton1_2012.pdf>.
Moyle,Brendan,2009:TheblackmarketinChinafortigerproducts.In:GlobalCrime10,124-143.
Moyle,Brendan,2013:Conservationthat’smorethanskin-deep:Alligatorfarming.In:BiodiversityandConservation,1-15.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0501-9>
Msimang,Mavuso,2012:Rhinoissuemanager:Finalreport.Pretoria:DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs.
Muleya,Thupeyo,2014:FakerhinohornlandsmanintroubleIn:TheHerald,14July2014.Murphree,Marshall,2013:Foreword.In:JensA.Andersson,etal.(eds.),Transfrontier
conservationareas.London:Routledge,XV–XX.Murthy,Dhiraj,2008:Digitalethnography:Anexaminationoftheuseofnewtechnologiesfor
socialresearch.In:Sociology42,837-855.<http://soc.sagepub.com/content/42/5/837.abstract>
404
Muth,RobertM.,1998:Thepersistenceofpoachinginadvancedindustrialsociety:Meaningsandmotivations—Anintroductorycomment.In:Society&NaturalResources11,5-7.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941929809381057>
Muth,RobertM./JohnF.Bowe,1998:IllegalharvestofrenewablenaturalresourcesinNorthAmerica:Towardatypologyofthemotivationsforpoaching.In:Society&NaturalResources11,9-24.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941929809381058>
Nadal,Alejandro,2015:Theeconomicsoflegalwildlifetrade:pitfallsandperspectives.WildlifeinCrisis:Markets,responsesandsolutions.UniversityofCapeTown,CapeTown(19May2015).
Nadal,Alejandro/FranciscoAguayo,2014:Leonardo'ssailors:AreviewoftheeconomicanalysisofwildlifetradeTheLeverhulmeCentrefortheStudyofValue.
Nadelmann,E.A.,1990:CaseforLegalization.In:DavidBoaz(ed.)FromCrisisinDrugProhibition.13-43.
Naidoo,L.,2005:Theeffectsofgamefarmsonsocio-economicrights.In:ECARP(ed.)Advancingpositivelandrightsandsustainablelivelihoodsforruralcommunities.Grahamstown.
Narayan,U.,1999:Dislocatingcultures,identities,traditions,andThirdWorldfeminism.NewYork:Routledge.
NationalProsecutingAuthority,2011:DieStaatteenDawidJacobusGroenewalden10ander:AktevanBeskuldigung,MusinaRegionalCourt.
Natural–History–Conservation.com,2015:MakingreplicasofrhinohornsandattachingthmtotaxidermyspecimensondisplayatthePowell-CottonMuseum,QuexPark.<http://www.natural-history-conservation.com/quexpark.htm>.
Navsa,ADP/JJAWallis/JJASwain,2014:LemthongthaiversustheState(849/2013)[2014]ZASCA131(25September
2014).CaseNo.849/2013,TheSupremeCourtofAppealofSouthAfrica.<http://www.justice.gov.za/sca/judgments/sca_2014/sca2014-131.pdf>.
Naylor,R.T.,2004:Theunderworldofivory.In:Crime,LawandSocialChange42,261-295.Naylor,R.T.,2004(b):Wagesofcrime:Blackmarkets,illegalfinanceandtheunderworld
economy.Vol.revisededition.Montreal:McGillQueens’sUniversityPress.Nefale,MukondeleliMichael2002:ThepolitcisoflandinLevubu,NorthernProvincec.1935–
1998.CapeTown:UniversityofCapeTown.<http://uctscholar.uct.ac.za/PDF/104136_Nefale_MM.pdf>
Nellemann,Christian,etal.,2014:Theenvironmentalcrimecrisis–Threatstosustainabledevelopmentfromillegalexploitationandtradeinwildlifeandforestresources.AUNEPRapidResponseAssessment.Nairobi:UnitedNationsEnvironmentProgrammeandGRID-Arendal,NairobiandArendal.<http://www.unep.org/unea/docs/RRAcrimecrisis.pdf>
NewEra,2015:Namibia:60rhinospoached.In:NewEra,12May2015.<http://allafrica.com/stories/201505121541.html>
Nichols,A.,2011:Ctesias:OnIndia.London:BloomsburyAcademicPublishing.Nijman,V.,2010:AnoverviewofinternationalwildlifetradefromSoutheastAsia.In:
BiodiversityandConservation19,1101-1114.Nijman,Vincent/ChrisR.Shepherd,2014:EmergenceofMongLaontheMyanmar-China
borderasaglobalhubfortheinternationaltradeinivoryandelephantparts.In:BiologicalConservation179,17-22.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320714002985>
405
Nijman,Vincent/ChrisR.Shepherd,2015:TradeintigersandotherwildcatsinMongLaandTachilek,Myanmar–Ataleoftwobordertowns.In:BiologicalConservation182,1-7.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320714004121>
Njini,Felix,13October2014:Namibiaoptstodehornitsrhinosasitbattlespoachers.In:Bloomberg.<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-13/namibian-government-dehorns-rhinos-as-poaching-threat-escalates.html>
Nordstrom,Carolyn,2007:Globaloutlaws:Crime,money,andpowerinthecontemporaryworld.Vol.16.Berkley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Norfolk,S.,2004:Examiningaccesstonaturalresourcesandlinkagestosustainabledevelopment:AcasestudyofMozambique.Rome,Italy:FoodandAgricultureOrganisationoftheUnitedNations.
Nowell,Kristin,2012a:Rhinoceroses:AssessmentofrhinohornintraditionalmedicineTRAFFIC.Nowell,Kristin,2012b:Wildlifecrimescorecard:Assessingcompliancewithandenforcement
ofCITEScommitmentsfortigers,rhinosandelephantsWorldWideFundforNature.<Availableat:http://www.wwf.org.uk/news_feed.cfm?unewsid=6133>
Odendahl,Teresa/AileenM.Shaw,2001:Interviewingelites.In:JaberF.Gubrium/JamesA.Holstein(eds.),Handbookofinterviewresearch.London:SAGEPublications,299–316.
Olivier,John,2011:Policestatement.BramleyPoliceStation(13May2011).Orenstein,Ronald,2013:Ivory,hornandblood.Buffalo:FireflyBooks.Orkin,M./CommunityAgencyforSocialEnquiry,1989:Sanctionsagainstapartheid.Cape
Town:NewAfricaBooks.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=oK7WFNm-3HgC>Ouzman,Sven,2001:Seeingisdeceiving:rockartandthenon-visual.In:WorldArchaeology
33,237–256.Paoli,Letizia,2001:Criminalfraternitiesorcriminalenterprises.In:P.Wiiliams/D.Vlassis
(eds.),Combattingtransnationalcrime:Concepts,activitiesandresponses.London:FrankCass.
Paoli,Letizia,2002:Theparadoxesoforganizedcrime.In:Crime,Law,AndSocialChange37,51-97.
Paoli,Letizia/PeterReuter/VictoriaGreenfield,2009:Theworldheroinmarket:Cansupplybecut?Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
Parker,J.T.,2013:ThemythicChineseunicorn:FriesenPress.<http://chinese-unicorn.com/title/>
Parker,S./M.Wolok,1992:ThestatusofpoachingintheUS:Areweprotectingourwildlife?Alburquerque:CenterforWildlife,UniversityofNewMexico.
ParliamentaryMonitoringGroup,2011:Landandtenurerightsforfarmdwellersandworkers:Meetingwithruraldevelopment/landreformstakeholdersanddeputyminister,RuralDevelopmentandLandReform.CapeTown.<http://www.pmg.org.za/report/20110316-meeting-stakeholders-rural-development-land-reform-focusing-evidence->.
Parry,Marc,2015:Conflictoversociologist'snarrativeputsspotlightonethnography.In:TheChronicleofHigherEducation.<https://chronicle.com/article/Conflict-Over-Sociologist-s/230883/>
Patton,Felix,2011:Themedicinalvalueofrhinohorn–aquestforthetruth.FirstavailableattheRhinoResourceCentre.<http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/pdf_files/132/1323815303.pdf>.
Paul,Kari,2014:Africanrhinostobeairliftedtosavethemfromextinction.In:Mashable,13August2014.<http://mashable.com/2014/08/13/south-africa-airlift-rhinos/>
406
PeaceParksFoundation,6January2014:LimpopoNationalParkspecialanti-poachingunitdeployed.<http://www.peaceparks.org/news.php?pid=1365&mid=1371>
PeaceParksFoundation,2014a:Background.<http://www.peaceparks.org/tfca.php?pid=19&mid=1005>
PeaceParksFoundation,2014b:CouldafencebetweenKrugerandLimpopoNationalParksstoprhinopoaching?,PeaceParksFoundation.<http://www.peaceparks.org/story.php?pid=1318&mid=1330>.
PeaceParksFoundation,2014c:Currentstatus.<http://www.peaceparks.org/programme.php?pid=25&mid=1009>
PeaceParksFoundation,2014d:LimpopoNationalParkissues2013revenuesharingchequetoparkcommunities,9June2014.<http://www.peaceparks.co.za/news.php?pid=1365&mid=1410>
PeaceParksFoundation,2014e:LimpopoNationalParkspecialanti-poachingunitdeployed.<http://www.peaceparks.co.za/news.php?pid=1365&mid=1371&lid=1009>
Pearce,Fred,2003:RhinorescueplandecimatesAsianantelopes.In:NewScientist.<http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3376-rhino-rescue-plan-decimates-asian-antelopes.html-.U_xDm0g0MZ4>
Pienaar,DaanJ./A.J.Hall-Martin/P.M.Hitchens,1991:Horngrowthratesoffree-rangingwhiteandblackrhinoceros.In:Koedoe34,97–105.
Pires,Stephen/RonaldV.Clarke,2012:AreparrotsCRAVED?AnanalysisofparrotpoachinginMexico.In:JournalofResearchinCrimeandDelinquency49,122-146.<http://jrc.sagepub.com/content/49/1/122.abstract>
Pires,StephenF.,2014:Theheterogeneityofillicitparrotmarkets:Ananalysisofsevenneo-tropicalopen-airmarkets.In:EuropeanJournalonCriminalPolicyandResearch,1-16.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10610-014-9246-6>
Player,Ian,2013:Thewhiterhinosaga.CapeTown:JonathanBallPublishers.Polanyi,M/CMArensberg/HWPearson,1957:Tradeandmarketintheearlyempires.
Glencoe,Illinois:FreePress.Polsky,Ned,1967:Hustlers,beatsandothers.NewYork:AnchorBooks.Portes,Alejandro,2010:Economicsociology.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.Portes,Alejandro/WilliamHaller,2005:Theinformaleconomy.In:N.Smelser/R.Swedberg
(eds.),Handbookofeconomicsociology.NewYork:RusselSageFoundation,403-425.ProfessionalHunters'AssociationofSouthAfrica,9December2014:Revenuefromhunting
touristsbreaksR1billionmark.<http://www.phasa.co.za/what-is-in-the-news/phasa-press-release/item/570-revenue-from-hunting-tourists-breaks-r1-billion-mark.html>.
Prothero,D.R./R.M.Schoch,2002:Horns,tusks,andflippers:Theevolutionofhoofedmammals.Baltimore:JohnsHopkinsUniversityPress.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=kWpQX-sfsLgC>
Pryce,Ken,1979:Endlesspresssure:AstudyofWestIndianlife-stylesinBristol.London:PenguinBooks.
PSI/Vietnam,ResearchandMetrics,2015:Rhinohornuseamongurbanhigh-incomemeninHanoiandHoChiMinhCity,Vietnam.SummaryReport.Hanoi,Vietnam:TRAFFICandPSI/Vietnam.
Quack,Sigrid,2009:'Global'marketsintheoryandhistory:Towardsacomparativeanalysis.In:KölnerZeitschriftfürSoziologieundSozialpsychologie,126-142.<http://ssrn.com/abstract=2121294>
407
Rabinow,Paul,1977:ReflectionsonfieldworkinMorocco.Berkley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=L0Xpj6gSY6gC>
Rademeyer,Julian,2012:Killingforprofit:Exposingtheillegalrhinohorntrade.CapeTown:ZebraPress.
Rademeyer,Julian,2014a:'Groenewaldgang'trialpostponed.KillingforProfit.<http://killingforprofit.com/2014/07/21/the-groenewald-gang-on-trial-2/>.
Rademeyer,Julian,2014b:Untouchable?WildlifecrimekingpinVixayKeosavang:EnvironmentalInvestigationAgency.<http://eia-international.org/vixay-keosavang-an-untouchable-kingpin-of-wildlife-crime>(18February2014).
Rademeyer,Julian,2015:NorthKoreandiplomatexpelledfromSAforrhinohorntrafficking.In:News24,23December2015.<http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/exclusive-north-korean-diplomat-expelled-from-sa-for-rhino-horn-trafficking-20151223>
Radin,MargaretJane,1996:Contestedcommodities.Cambridge,Massachusetts:HarvardUniversityPress.
Raemaekers,Serge,etal.,2011:ReviewofthecausesoftheriseoftheillegalSouthAfricanabalonefisheryandconsequentclosureoftherights-basedfishery.In:Ocean&CoastalManagement54,433-445.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569111000251>
Raghuram,Parvati/ClareMadge,2006:Towardsamethodforpostcolonialdevelopmentgeography?Possibilitiesandchallenges.In:SingaporeJournalofTropicalGeography27,270-288.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00262.x>
Ramsay,Scott,2014:SwazilandshowingAfricahowtosaverhinos–InterviewwithTedReilly.YearintheWildBlog.<http://www.yearinthewild.com/swaziland-showing-africa-how-to-save-rhinos-interview-with-ted-reilly-part-1/>.
Ramutsindela,M.,2007:TransfrontierconservationinAfrica:Attheconfluenceofcapital,politicsandnature:CABI.<https://encrypted.google.com/books?id=6ya2XwyH-moC>
Ramutsindela,Maano,2006:Parksandpeopleinpostcolonialsocieties:ExperiencesinsouthernAfrica.NewYork:KluwerAcademicPublishers.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=t3GddWAjGbMC>
Raymond,JaniceG/JaniceGRaymond,2004:Tenreasonsfornotlegalizingprostitutionandalegalresponsetothedemandforprostitution.In:JournalOfTraumaPractice2,315-332.
Reeve,Ros/StephenEllis,1995:Aninsider'saccountoftheSouthAfricansecurityforces’roleintheivorytrade.In:JournalofContemporaryAfricanStudies13,227-243.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02589009508729574>
Reeve,Rosalind,2002:Policinginternationaltradeinendangeredspecies,SustainableDevelopmentProgramme.London:EarthscanPublicationsLtd.
Reeve,Rosalind,2006:Wildlifetrade,sanctionsandcompliance:lessonsfromtheCITESregime.In:InternationalAffairs82,881-897.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00576.x>
Reilly,B.,2014:GameranchinginSouthAfricaWidllifeSociety.<http://news.wildlife.org/twp/game-ranching-in-south-africa/>
Reinstein,Dorine,21August2014:SANParksinvolvedinrhinocontroversyIn:TheSouthernAfricanTourismUpdate.<http://www.tourismupdate.co.za/home/detail?articleId=73793&useOldId=true>
RepublicofMozambique,2013:ConservationsAreasAct,AssemblyoftheRepublic.Maputo.
408
RepublicofSouthAfrica,1996:ConstitutionoftheRepublicofSouthAfrica.RepublicofSouthAfrica,.<http://www.thehda.co.za/uploads/images/unpan005172.pdf>.
RepublicofSouthAfrica,2013:Rhinoconservation,theillegalkillingandhuntingofrhinocerosinSouthAfricaandcommentsontheproposalsubmittedbyKenyatoplaceazeroquotafortheexportofhuntingtrophiesofwhiterhinoceros.SixteenthmeetingoftheConferenceofParties.Bangkok,Thailand.<http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/16/inf/E-CoP16i-38.pdf>.
Reuter,Peter,1983:Disorganizedcrimetheeconomicsofthevisiblehand.Cambridge,Massachusett:TheMITPress.
Reuter,Peter,1985:Theorganizationofillegalmarkets:Aneconomicanalysis,NIJresearchreport.Washington,D.C.:NationalInstituteofJustice,USDeparmentofJustice.
Reuter,Peter,1987:Fact,fancy,andorganizedCrime.In:ThePublicInterest53,45-67.Reuter,Peter,2009:Systemicviolenceindrugmarkets.In:Crime,LawandSocialChange52,
275-284.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10611-009-9197-x>Reuter,Peter/JohnHaaga,1989:Theorganizationofhigh-leveldrugmarkets:Anexploratory
study.SantaMonica,California:TheRandCorporation.Reuter,Peter/HaroldAPollack,2012:Goodmarketsmakebadneighbors.In:Criminology&
PublicPolicy11,211-220.Richardson,Sue/MiriamMcMullan,2007:ResearchethicsintheUK:Whatcansociologylearn
fromhealth?In:Sociology41,1115-1132.<http://soc.sagepub.com/content/41/6/1115.abstract>
Ripple,WilliamJ.,etal.,2015:Collapseoftheworld’slargestherbivores.Vol.1.<http://advances.sciencemag.org/advances/1/4/e1400103.full.pdf>
Robinson,Laura/JeremySchulz,2009:Newavenuesforsociologicalinquiry:Evolvingformsofethnographicpractice.In:Sociology43.
Roosevelt,Theodore,1910:Africangametrails:AnaccountoftheAfricanwanderingsofanAmericanhunter–naturalist.NewYork:St.Martin'sPress.
Rose-Greenland,Fiona/TraceyHeatherington,2014:Normsandillegalityinthesocialmargins.In:JournalofModernItalianStudies19,505-513.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2014.962251>
Rubin,H.J./I.S.Rubin,2012:Qualitativeinterviewing:Theartofhearingdata.3rdedition.London:SAGEPublications.
Ruggiero,Vincenzo,1996:Warmarkets:CorporateandorganizedcriminalsinEurope.In:Social&LegalStudies5.
Said,EdwardW.,1979:Orientalism.NewYork:VintageBooks.<http://books.google.de/books?id=zvJ3YwOkZAYC>
Sand,PeterH.,1997:Commodityortaboo?InternationalregulationoftradeinendangeredspeciesYearbookofInternationalCo-operationonEnvironmentandDevelopment.19–36.<http://fni.no/YBICED/97_01_sand.pdf>
Sandberg,Sveinung,2008:Blackdrugdealersinawhitewelfarestate.In:BritishJournalofCriminology48,604-619.
Sandberg,Sveinung,2012:Theimportanceofcultureforcannabismarkets.In:BritishJournalofCriminology.
Sandberg,Sveinung/HeithCopes,2013:Speakingwithethnographers:Thechallengesofresearchingdrugdealersandoffenders.In:JournalOfDrugIssues43,176–197.<http://jod.sagepub.com/content/43/2/176.abstract>
409
SANParks,9July2012:Revisedzoningsystem–KrugerNationalPark.<http://www.sanparks.org/parks/kruger/news.php?id=55218?PHPSESSID=p3dhcmvdsgj1fohog0q0dkeer7>
SARPCCO,2014:Background.<http://sarpcco.org/index.php/members>Satz,Debra,2010:Whysomethingsshouldnotbeforsale.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.Savage,Mike/RogerBurrows,2007:TheComingCrisisofEmpiricalSociology.In:Sociology41,
885-899.<http://soc.sagepub.com/content/41/5/885.abstract>SavetheRhino,2014:Rhinopopulationfigures.<
http://www.savetherhino.org/rhino_info/rhino_population_figures>.Saviano,Roberto,2007:Gomorrah:ApersonaljourneyIntotheviolentinternationalempireof
Naples'organizedcrimesystem.NewYork:Farrar,StrausandGiroux.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=2OFYMBz1uGQC>
Saxton,Robert,2007:ThefutureoftheAfricanrhinoceros:Itsanythingbutblackandwhite.MichiganStateUniversityCollege:AnimalLegalandHistoricalCenter.
Schack,Wilhelm,2012:Towardsastrategicplantohaltrhinopoaching.RIMTalks.NationalAssembly,SouthAfric.<http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/docs/120126wilhelm-schack-sub_3.pdf>(26January2012).
Schelling,ThomasC.,1967:Economicsandcriminalenterprise.In:ThePublicInterest7,61-78.Schelling,ThomasC.,1978:EconomicanalysisoforganizedcrimeReadingsinCriminology.
PeterWickmanandPhillipWhitten.Scheper-Hughes,N./L.Wacquant,2002:CommodifyingBodies:SAGEPublications.
<https://encrypted.google.com/books?id=eQ8oiUCXNtYC>Scheper-Hughes,Nancy,2000:Theglobaltrafficinhumanorgans.In:CurrentAnthropology
41,191-211.Scheper-Hughes,Nancy,2004:Partsunknown:Undercoverethnographyoftheorgans-
traffickingunderworld.In:Ethnography5,29-73.<http://eth.sagepub.com/content/5/1/29.abstract>
Scheyvens,R.,2014:Developmentfieldwork:Apracticalguide.London:SAGEPublications.<http://books.google.de/books?id=xKw5AwAAQBAJ>
Schlosser,JenniferA.,2008:Issuesininterviewinginmates:Navigatingthemethodologicallandminesofprisonresearch.In:QualitativeInquiry.<http://qix.sagepub.com/content/early/2008/06/27/1077800408318325.abstract>
Schmid,Jeanette,2010:ReflectionsonandofSelfinSouthAfrica.In:QualitativeSocialWork9,169–184.<http://qsw.sagepub.com/content/9/2/169.abstract>
Schmidt-Soltau,Kai/DanBrockington,2007:Protectedareasandresettlement:Whatscopeforvoluntaryrelocation?In:WorldDevelopment35,2182–2202.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X07001441>
Schneider,FriedrichandErnste,Dominik,2002:Theshadoweconomy.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Schneider,JacquelineL.,2012:Soldintoextinction:Theglobaltradeinendangeredspecies.SantaBarbara:Praeger.<https://encrypted.google.com/books?id=Qz9Oa-BHkbsC>
Scholtz,Susan,2012:ThesurvivaloftherhinoinSouthAfrica,forSouthAfrica–Acriticalapproach.SouthAfrica:TheLivingGhoen.
Schrader,Hanti,2015:Anti-poachingexpertswantsnationalstatisticsonrhinopoachingreleased.In:TheLowvelder.<http://lowvelder.co.za/279143/anti-poaching-experts-wants-national-statistics-on-rhino-poaching-released/>
Schwellnus,Guido,2012:Qualitativetextanalysis:Essexsummerschool.
410
Scriven,Lisa/TheunsEloff,2003:MarketsderivedfromnaturetoursiminSouthAfricaandKwaZulu-Natal:Asurveyofthesaleoflivegame.In:BruceAylward/ErnstLutz(eds.),Naturetourism,conservationanddevelopmentinKwaZulu–Natal.Washington:TheWorldBank,245–286.
Sellar,JohnM.,2014a:Isthisthebestwecando?JohnSellar'spersonalblogonLinkedIn.<https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/article/20141016125602-185378273-is-this-really-the-best-we-can-do>.
Sellar,JohnM.,2014b:Nevermindtheelephant–weneedapolicemanintheroom.LinkedIn.<https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/article/20140623085456-185378273-never-mind-the-elephant-we-need-a-policeman-in-the-room>.
Sellar,JohnM.,2014c:Policingthetraffickingofwildlife:Isthereanythingtolearnfromlawenforcementresponsestodrugandfirearmstrafficking?Geneva:TheGlobalInitiativeagainstTransnationalOrganizedCrime.
Sellar,JohnM.,2015:What'shappeninginKrugerissomuchmorethanpoaching.LinkedIn.<https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/whats-happening-kruger-so-much-more-than-poaching-sellar-obe-frgs?trk=hp-feed-article-title>.
Sellar,JohnM.,2008:WrittentestimonytotheU.S.HouseofRepresentatives,CommitteeonNaturalResources,regardingPoachingAmericanSecurity:ImpactsofIllegalWildlifeTrade.Geneva:SecretariatofCITES.
Shea,J.,2006:Applyingevidence-basedmedicinetoChinesetraditionalmedicine:DebateandStrategy.In:JournalofAlternativeandComplementaryMedicine12,255–263.
Shelley,Louise,2010:HumanTrafficking:Aglobalperspective.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=XY8uJoYkNBsC>
Shengqing,Li/ZuEndong/LiuLijun,2011:Identificationofrhinoceroshornanditssubstitutes.In:AdvancedMaterialsResearch177,636–639.
Shepard,Odell,1930:LoreoftheUnicorn.<http://www.sacred-texts.com/etc/lou/lou03.htm>.
Sherman,LawrenceW.,1993:Defiance,deterrence,andirrelevance:Atheoryofthecriminalsanction.In:JournalofResearchinCrimeandDelinquency30,445-473.<http://jrc.sagepub.com/content/30/4/445.abstract>
Shoreman-Ouimet,Eleanor/HelenKopnina,2015:Reconcilingecologicalandsocialjusticetopromotebiodiversityconservation.In:BiologicalConservation184,320-326.
Sickman,L.C.S./A.C.Soper,1971:TheartandarchitectureofChina.NewHaven:YaleUniversityPress.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=lVS8QgAACAAJ>
Sidaway,JamesDerrick,1992:Inotherworlds:Onthepoliticsofresearchby'FirstWorld'geographersinthe'ThirdWorld'.In:Area24,403-408.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/20003184>
Sieber,JoanE.,Planningethicallyrepsonsibleresearch:Aguideforstudentsandinternalreviewboards.NewburyPark:SAGEPublications.
Sieber,JoanE./BabaraStanley,1988:Ethicalandprofessionaldimensionsofsociallysensitiveresearch.In:AmericanPsychologist43,49-55.
SilkRoadDrugs,2014:CouldillegalsiteslikeSilkroadbegoodforsociety.SilkRoadDrugs:HowtofindSilkRoadandbesafe.<http://silkroaddrugs.org/>(13June2014).
Simon,HerbertA.,1972:Theoriesofboundedrationality.In:Decisionandorganization1,161-176.
411
Simpson,Bob,2006:'Youdon'tdofieldwork,fieldworkdoesyou':Betweensubjectivationandobjectivationinanthropologicalfieldwork.In:DickHobbs/RichardWright(eds.),TheSagehandbookoffieldwork.London:SAGEPublications,125–138.
Singh,JeromeAmir,2008:ProjectCoast:EugenicsinapartheidSouthAfrica.In:Endeavour32,5–9.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160932708000057>
Singh,Sarinda,2008:Contestingmoralities:thepoliticsofwildlifetradeinLaos.In:JournalofPoliticalEcology15,1-20.
Sissener,ToneKristin,2001:Anthropologicalperspectivesoncorruption.CMIWorkingPapers.Bergen:Chr.MichelsenInstitute.<http://bora.cmi.no/dspace/bitstream/10202/209/1/WP2001-05.PDF>(8July2015).
Sitas,Ari,2014:RethinkingAfrica’ssociologicalproject.In:CurrentSociology62,457-471.<http://csi.sagepub.com/content/62/4/457.abstract>
Skinner,Rod,2016:Femalerhinopoacherswillspendtonightinprison.In:LadysmithGazette,11March2016.<http://ladysmithgazette.co.za/56453/update-female-rhino-poachers-will-spend-tonight-in-prison/-.VuVvHxH1UZy.facebook>
Skocpol,Theda,1977:Wallerstein'sworldcapitalistsystem:atheoreticalandhistoricalcritique:JSTOR.
Smith,Andrew,1838:IllustrationsofthezoologyofSouthAfrica.London:Smith,ElderandCornhill.<https://ia600306.us.archive.org/34/items/illustrationsofz14smit/illustrationsofz14smit.pdf>
Smith,David,2013:SouthAfricanministerbackslegalisationofrhinohorntrade.In:TheGuardian.<http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/mar/25/south-africa-rhino-horn-trade>
Smith,N./S.Wilson,2002:Changinglandusetrendsinthethicketbiome:PastoralismtogamefarmingTerrestrialEcologyResearchUnit38.
Snee,Helene,2008:Web2.0asasocialscienceresearchtoolESCRGovernmentPlacementScheme
TheBritishLibrary.<http://www.restore.ac.uk/orm/futures/Web_2.0_final__v3.pdf>Sonjica,Buyelwa2010:InternalquestionpaperNo.31NW3503E,NationalAssemblyofSouth
Africa.CapeTown:HANSARD.SouthAfricanHistoryOnline,2014:Alanddispossessionhistory1600s–1990s.
<http://www.sahistory.org.za/control-1910-1948>.SouthAfricanLawCommission,1990:Acquisitionandlossofownershipofgame.Working
Paper27,Project27.Pretoria,SouthAfrica:<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=2HI_AQAAIAAJ>
SouthAfricanNationalParks,2010/2011:AnnualReport2010/2011.Pretoria.<http://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/general/annual-report-2011.pdf>.
SouthAfricanNationalParks,2011/2012:AnnualReport2011/2012.Pretoria.<http://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/general/annual-report-2012.pdf>.
SouthAfricanNationalParks,2012/2013:AnnualReport2012/2013.Pretoria.<http://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/general/annual-report-2013.pdf>.
SouthAfricanNationalParks,2013/2014:Annualreport2013/2014.Pretoria.<http://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/general/annual-report-2014.pdf>.
SouthAfricanVeterinaryCouncil,2010:Greenhunts.<http://www.savc.org.za/pdf_docs/Green_Hunts_vets_June_2010.pdf>.
412
SouthAfrica.info,2005:'Greenhunting'theBigFive.18July200518July2005.<http://www.southafrica.info/travel/wildlife/greenhuntin.htm>.
Speart,Jessica,1994:Therhinochainsawmassacre;conservationmovementagainstpoachingofrhinohorns.In:Buzzworm'sEarthJournals6.
Spierenburg,Marja,2011:ThepoliticsoftheliminalandtheliminoidintransfrontierconservationinsouthernAfrica.In:AnthropologySouthernAfrica34,81-88.
Spierenburg,Marja/ConradSteenkamp/HarryWels,2006:EnclosingthelocalfortheGlobalCommons:CommunitylandrightsintheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierConservationArea.In:ConservationandSociety6,87–97.
Spierenburg,Marja/HarryWels,2010:ConservativePhilanthropists,RoyaltyandBusinessElitesinNatureConservationinSouthernAfrica.In:Antipode42,647-670.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00767.x>
StaffreporterforCanberraTimes,2011:Fakehornsmaysavetherhino.In:CanberraTimes,20November2011.
StaffreporterforThanhnienNews,2012:Rhinohorntheftjusttipoftheiceberg.In:ThanhnienNews,26October2012.<http://www.thanhniennews.com/society/rhino-horn-theft-just-tip-of-iceberg-4703.html>
Standing,Andre,2003:Rivalviewsoforganizedcrime.Pretoria,SouthAfrica:InstituteforSecurityStudies.
Standing,Andre,2006:Organisedcrime:AstudyfromtheCapeFlats.Pretoria,SouthAfrica:InstituteforSecurityStudies.
Stein,Michael,2006:Yourplaceormine:Thegeographyofsocialresearch.In:DickHobbs/RichardWright(eds.),TheSagehandbookoffieldwork.London:SAGEPublications,59–76.
Steinberg,Jonny,2004:Nongoloza'sChildren:WesternCapeprisongangsduringandafterapartheid.Braamfontein:CentrefortheStudyofViolenceandReconciliation
Steinberg,Jonny,2005a:TheillicitabalonetradeinSouthAfrica.Pretoria,SouthAfrica:InstituteforSecurityStudies.
Steinberg,Jonny,2005b:TheNumber:Oneman'ssearchforidentityintheCapeunderworldandprisongangs.CapeTown:JonathanBallPublishers.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=7vwMGQAACAAJ>
Steiner,Philippe,2003/5:Giftsofbloodandorgans:Themarketand"fictitious"commoditiesIn:RevueFrançaisedeSociologie44,147–162.
Steiner,Philippe/MarieTrespeuch,2013:Managingpassionandconstructinginterest:Onlinegambling,humanbodypartsandthemarket.In:RevueFrançaisedeSociologie54,143–166.
Steinhart,E.I.,2006:Blackpoachers,whitehunters:AsocialhistoryofhuntingincolonialKenya.Oxford:JamesCurrey.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=xXaP-eY493cC>
Stoddard,Ed,6October2014:SouthAfrica'sKrugerParkinvitesbidsforrhinos.In:Reuters.<http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/06/us-safrica-rhinos-idUSKCN0HV19Y20141006>
Stoller,Paul,2015:AliceGoffmanandthefutureofethnography.In:TheHuffingtonPostBooks.<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-stoller/alice-goffman-and-the-future-of-ethnography-_b_7585614.html>
Strauss,Anselm/JulietCorbin,1998:Basicsofqualitativeresearch:Techniquesandproceduresfordevelopinggroundedtheory.ThousandOaks:SagePublishers.
413
Sturgis,Patrick,2011:Designingsamples.In:NigelGilbert(ed.)Researchingsociallife.London:Sage,165–181.
SullivanBrennan,Deborah,2014:Canetheyclonearhino?...Yes,butscientistsaimtobeatthatstandardwithstemcells.In:SanDiegoUnionTribune,21December2014.
Swanepoel,Gerhard,1998:Theillegaltradeinrhinohorn:Anexampleofanendangeredspecies.In:InternationalJournalofRiskSecurityandCrimePrevention3,207-220.
Tagliatesta,Francesca,2007:IconographyoftheunicornfromIndiatotheItalianMiddleAges.In:EastandWest57,175–192.
Talbot,J.M.,2004:Groundsforagreement:Thepoliticaleconomyofthecoffeecommoditychain.Lanham:Rowman&LittlefieldPublishers.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=HVIeAAAAQBAJ>
Tanner,Christopher,2002:Law–makinginanAfricancontext:The1997MozambicanLandLawFAO.<http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/legal/docs/lpo26.pdf>
Taylor,Andrew,etal.,2014:TheviabilityoflegalisingtradeinrhinohorninSouthAfrica,DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs.Pretoria:DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs.<http://conservationaction.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/The-viability-of-legalising-trade-in-rhino-horn-in-South-Africa.pdf>.
Taylor,Andrew,etal.,2014:TheviabilityoflegalisingtradeinrhinohorninSouthAfrica.Pretoria:DepartmentofEnvironmentalAffairs.
Taylor,Jonathan,2015:ThestimulantsofProhibition:Illegalityandnewsyntheticdrugs.In:Territory,Politics,Governance,1-21.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2015.1053516>
TheEconomist,2014:Pressdown,popup;Prohibitionanddrugs.In:TheEconomist.TheGrandJuryfortheMiddleDistrictofAlabama,2014:Indictment:UnitedStatesofAmerica
versusDawieJacobusGroenewald,JannemanGeorgeGroenewald,andValinorTradingCC,d/b/aOutofAfricaAdventurousSafaris,TheGrandJuryfortheMiddleDistrictofAlabama.<https://www.fws.gov/southeast/news/pdf/RhinoIndictment.pdf?>.
TheIUCNRedListofThreatenedSpecies,2014a:Monodonmonoceros.<http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/13704/0>(4September2014).
TheIUCNRedListofThreatenedSpecies,2014b:Saigatatarica.<http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/19832/0>(26August2014).
ThePeople'sRepublicofChina,1993:CircularoftheStateCouncilonBanningtheTradeofRhinocerosHornandTigerBone,StateCouncil.<http://www.unodc.org/res/cld/document/circular-of-the-state-council-on-banning-the-trade-of-rhinoceros-horn-and-tiger-bone_html/Circular_of_the_State_Council_on_Banning_the_Trade_of_Rhinoceros_Horn_and_Tiger_Bone.pdf>.
TheRegionalDivisionofGautengKemptonPark,2012:Chargesheetandplea:TheStateversusChumlongLemthongthai,PunpitakChunchom,MarnusSteyl,ToolSriton,HarryClaassens,PatrickMatthys,OubeneFrankKobea.
TheWorldBank,2001:OP4.12InvoluntaryResettlement<http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTOPMANUAL/0,,contentMDK:20064610~menuPK:64701637~pagePK:64709096~piPK:64709108~theSitePK:502184,00.html>
414
Thomson,Allison,16August2014:SANParksallegedlysoldrhinostohuntingfarmsfor'safekeeping'.In:AfricaGeographic.<http://africageographic.com/blog/sanparks-allegedly-sold-rhinos-to-hunting-farms-for-safekeeping/>
Thoumi,FranciscoE.,2003:Illegaldrugs,economy,andsocietyintheAndes.Baltimore:JohnHopkinsUniversityPress.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=U2p8WYvPezAC>
Throop,P.,1998:HildegardvonBingen'sPhysica:ThecompleteEnglishtranslationofherclassicworkonhealthandhealing.Rochester,Vermont:InnerTraditions/Bear.
Thunberg,C.P.,1793:TravelsinEurope,Africa,andAsiaperformedbetweentheyears1770and1779.Vol.2.London:W.Richardson.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=slsUAAAAQAAJ>
Topsell,Edward,1658:Thehistoryoffour–footedbeastsandserpents.London:E.CotesforG.Sawbridge.
TransformDrugPolicyFoundation,2011:TheWaronDrugs:Creatingcrime,enrichingcriminals<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/64663568/library/Crime-briefing.pdf>
Trung,PhungMy/DangLinhHuong,2013:TearsofrhinohorninSouthAfrica.<http://www.vncreatures.net/e_news_19.php>.
TruthandReconciliationCommission,1998:TruthandReconciliationCommissionofSouthAfricaReport.SouthAfrica:TruthandReconciliationCommission.<http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/finalreport/Volume2.pdf>
Tsing,AnnaLowenhaupt,2005:Friction:Anethnographyofglobalconnection.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.
Tsoka,J./A.J.Levenberg,2013:LemtongthaivS(A82/2013)[2013]ZAGPJHC294;2014(1)SACR495(GJ)(30August2013)CASENo.A82/2013,JohannesburgSouthGautengHighCourt.<http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2013/294.html>.
U.S.FishandWildlifeService,2014:OperationCrash.<https://www.fws.gov/home/feature/2014/3-31-14-Operation-Crash-Overview.pdf>.
Unicornsarereal,they'rejustfatandgrayandwecallthemrhinos,2009:Unicornsarereal,they'rejustfatandgrayandwecallthemrhinos.Vol.2012.<https://www.facebook.com/pages/Unicorns-are-real-theyre-just-fat-and-gray-and-we-call-them-rhinos/186077714115>.
UnitedNationsConferenceonDiplomaticIntercourseandImmunities,1961:ViennaConventiononDiplomaticRelations,UnitedNations.NeueHofburg,Vienna:UnitedNationsTreatySeries.Vol.7310.<https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/MTDSG/VolumeI/ChapterIII/III-3.en.pdf>.
UnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramme,2013:Theriseofthesouth:Humanprogressinadiverseworld<http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/HDR/2013GlobalHDR/English/HDR2013ReportEnglish.pdf>
UnitedNationsGeneralAssembly,15November2000:UnitedNationsConventionagainstTransnationalOrganizedCrime.AdoptedbyGeneralAssemblyresolution55/25,UnitedNations.<http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CTOC/-Fulltext>.
UnitedStatesDistrictCourt,2013:JointfactualstatementinthecaseoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaversusZhifeiLi.Crim.Nos.13–113and13–552.DistrictofNewJersey:UNODCSHERLOC.<http://www.unodc.org/res/cld/case-law-doc/wildlifecrimetype/usa/2013/united_states_v_zhifei_li_html/USA-14.pdf>.
UNODC,2009:TransnationaltraffickingandtheruleoflawinWestAfrica:Athreatassessment.Vienna,Austria:PolicyAnalysisandResearchBranch.
415
UNODC,2010:TheGlobalizationofCrime:ATransnationalOrganizedCrimeThreatAssessment.Vienna:UNODC.
USDepartmentofJustice,2013:RingleaderofinternationalrhinosmugglingconspiracypleadsguiltyinNewJerseytowildlifetraffickingcrimes.<http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ringleader-international-rhino-smuggling-conspiracy-pleads-guilty-new-jersey-wildlife>(19December2013).
Uzzi,Brian1997:Socialstructureandcompetitionininterfirmnetworks:Theparadoxofembeddedness.In:AdministrativeScienceQuarterly42,35-67.
vanHoven,Wouter,2015:PrivategamereservesinsouthernAfrica.In:RenévanderDuim/MachielLamers/JakomijnvanWijk(eds.),Institutionalarrangementsforconservation,developmentandtourismineasternandsouthernAfrica.SpringerNetherlands,101-118.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9529-6_6>
Van,NguyenDaoNgoc/NguyenTap,2008:AnoverviewoftheuseofplantsandanimalsintraditionalmedicinesystemsinVietNam.HaNoi,VietNam:TRAFFICSoutheastAsia,GreaterMekongProgramme.
VanSchendel,Willem/IttyAbraham,2005:Introduction:Themakingofillicitness.In:WillemVanSchendel/IttyAbraham(eds.),Illicitflowsandcriminalthings:States,borders,andtheothersideofglobalization.Bloomington:IndianaUniversityPress.
vanSluis,Arie/PeterMarks/VictorBekkers,2011:NodalpolicingintheNetherlands:Strategicandnormativeconsiderationsonanevolvingpractice.In:Policing.<http://policing.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/09/14/police.par045.abstract>
vanSluis,Arie,etal.,2012:NodalsecurityintheportsofRotterdamandAntwerp.In:H.J.M.Fenger/M.Fenger/V.J.J.M.Bekkers(eds.),Beyondfragmentationandinterconnectivity:Publicgovernanceandthesearchforconnectivecapacity.IOSPress.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=NhrvAgAAQBAJ>
Varese,Federico,2011:Mafiasonthemove.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.Varese,Frederico,2006:TheeconomicsoftheCamorra.In:GlobalCrime7,268-273.Varisco,DanielMartin,1989a:Beyondrhinohorn–wildlifeconservationforNorthYemen.In:
Oryx23,215–219.Varisco,DanielMartin,1989b:Fromrhinohornstodaggerhandles-adeadlybusiness.In:
AnimalKingdom3,44-49.Vasquez,JuanCarlos,2003:ComplianceandenforcementmechanismsofCITES.In:Sara
Oldfield(ed.)Thetradeinwildlife:Regulationforconservation.London:EarthscanPublicationsLtd,63-69.
Veblen,Thorstein,1899:Thetheoryoftheleisureclass.NewYork:Macmillan.Venkatesh,SudhirAlladi,2008:Gangleaderforaday:Aroguesociologisttakestothestreets.
London:Penguin.Vietnam,2013:IllegaltradeofrhinoceroshorninVietnam,CITES.
<http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/16/inf/E-CoP16i-24.pdf>.VietnamCITESManagementAuthority,31January2014:ReporttotheCITESSecretariaton
Vietnam'scompliancewithResolution9.14(Rev.CoP15)ontheConservationofandTradeinAfricanandAsianRhinoceroses.Hanoi,Vietnam:
Vigne,Lucy,2013:Recentfindingsontheivoryandrhino-horntradeinLaoPeople’sDemocraticRepublic.In:Pachyderm,36–44.
Vigne,Lucy/EsmondMartin,2008:Yemen’sattitudestowardsrhinohornandjambiyas.In:Pachyderm44,45-53.
416
Vigne,Lucy/EsmondMartin,2013:DemandforrhinohorndeclinesinYemen.In:Oryx47,323-324.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605313000446>
Vira,Varun/ThomasEwing,2014:Ivory'scurse:ThemilitarizationandprofessionalizationofpoachinginAfricaBornFreeUSA.<http://a362a94f6d3f5f370057-c70bddd8faa4afe1b2ec557b907836d0.r4.cf1.rackcdn.com/Ivorys-Curse-2014.pdf>
Vleissentraal,2014:AlgehelerenosteruitverkopingnamensJanPienaar,Kareeboombult/Hoopstad,Saterdag–15Maart2014.<http://www.vleissentraal.co.za/admin/statistics/JanPienaar-RenosterStatistiekMrt2014.pdf>.
vonEssen,Erica/MichaelP.Allen,2015:Reconsideringillegalhuntingasacrimeofdissent:Implicationforjusticeanddeliberativeuptake.In:CriminalLawandPhilosophy,1-16.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9364-8>
vonEssen,Erica,etal.,2014:Deconstructingthepoachingphenomenon:Areviewoftypologiesforunderstandingillegalhunting.In:BritishJournalofCriminology.<http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/04/17/bjc.azu022.abstract>
vonMeibom,S.,etal.,2010:Saigaantelopetrade:GlobaltrendswithafocusonSoutheastAsia.TRAFFICprojectreporttotheCITESSecretariat.
Wacquant,Loïc,2002:Thecuriouseclipseofprisonethnographyintheageofmassincarceration.In:Ethnography3,371-397.<http://eth.sagepub.com/content/3/4/371.abstract>
Walker,Clive/AntonWalker,2012:Therhinokeepers.Johannesburg:JacanaMedia.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=QLxZaIkDIG4C>
Wallerstein,Immanuel,2011:Themodernworld-systemI:CapitalistagricultureandtheoriginsoftheEuropeanworld-economyinthesixteenthcentury,withanewprologue.Vol.1.Berkley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Waquant,Loîc,2002:Scrutinizingthestreet:Poverty,moralityandthepitfallsofurbanethnography.In:AmericanJournalofSociology107,1468–1532.
Warchol,GregL.,2004:Thetransnationalillegalwildlifetrade.In:CriminalJusticeStudies17,57-73.
Warchol,GregL./LindaL.Zupan/WillieClack,2003:Transnationalcriminality:AnanalysisoftheillegalwildlifemarketinsouthernAfrica.In:InternationalCriminalJusticeReview13.
Weber,Max,[1921]1972:Wesen,VoraussetzungenundEntfaltungderbürokratischenHerrschaft.In:JohannesWinckelmann(ed.)WirtschaftundGesellschaft.Tübingen:J.C.BMohr(PaulSiebeck).
Webster,E.,1981:Servantsofapartheid?–AsurveyofsocialresearchintoindustryinSouthAfrica.In:JohnRex(ed.)Apartheidandsocialresearch.Paris:TheUnescoPress,85–114.
Wehinger,Frank,2011:IllegaleMärkte:StanddersozialwissenschaftlichenForschung.Cologne,Germany:MaxPlanckInstitutefortheStudyofSocieties.
Weiner-Levy,Naomi,2009:Whenthehegemonystudiestheminority—AnIsraeliJewishresearcherstudiesDruzewomen:Transformationsofpower,alienation,andaffinityinthefield.In:QualitativeInquiry15,721-739.<http://qix.sagepub.com/content/15/4/721.abstract>
Weiß,Anja/Arnd-MichaelNohl,2012:FälleundKontexteimMehrebenenvergleich:EinVorschlagzurÜberwindungdesmethodologischenNationalismusinderMigrationsforschung.In:ZeitschriftfürQualitativeForschung13,55-75.
417
Wellsmith,Melanie,2011:WildlifeCrime:TheProblemsofEnforcement.In:EuropeanJournalonCriminalPolicyandResearch17,125-148.
Welsh,David,1981:Socialresearchinadividedsociety:ThecaseofSouthAfrica.In:JohnRex(ed.)Apartheidandresearch.Paris:TheUNESCOPress,27–44.
Welz,Adam,2012:ThedirtywaragainstAfrica'sremainingrhinos.environment360.<http://e360.yale.edu/feature/the_dirty_war_against_africas_remaining_rhinos/2595/>.
Werksman,J./J.Cameron/P.Roderick,2014:Improvingcompliancewithinternationalenvironmentallaw:Routledge.<http://books.google.de/books?id=VCWZAgAAQBAJ>
Wester,Bryan,2015:BuyingpropertyinMozambique.Maputo,Mozambique.<http://propertymaputo.com/buying-property-in-mozambique/>.
White,HarrisonC.,1981:Wheredomarketscomefrom?In:AmericanJournalofSociology87,517-547.
Wijnsteker,Willem,2003:TheevolutionofCITES:AreferencetotheConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFloraandFauna.Geneva:CITESSecretariat.<http://www.cites.org/eng/resources/pub/evolution.pdf>
Williams,Phil,1998:TheNatureofDrug-TraffickingNetworks.In:CurrentHistory97,154-159.Williamson,OliverE.,1989:Transactioncosteconomics.In:Handbookofindustrial
organization1.Willock,Anna,2004:Administrativeandmonitoringimplicationsoflistinganddown-listingof
commercially-exploitedaquaticspecies,includingtheimplicationsofAnnex4ofResolutionConf.9.24.PaperpresentedatonferenceonFAOExpertConsultationon'ImplementationIssuesAssociatedwithListingCommercially–exploitedAquaticSpeciesontheCITESAppendices'.<http://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/news/meetings/IFS-05/IFS05-TRAFFIC-paper.pdf>
Wilson,Ken,1992:Thinkingaboutethicsoffieldwork.In:StephenDevereux/JohnHoddinott(eds.),Fieldworkindevelopingcountries.NewYork:HarvesterWheatsheaf,179–199.
Wilson,Kenneth,2005:Ofdiffusionandcontext:Thebubblingupofcommunity–basedresourcemanagementinMozambiqueinthe1990s.In:J.P.Brosius/A.L.Tsing/C.Zerner(eds.),Communitiesandconservation:Historiesandpoliticsofcommunity-basednaturalresourcemanagement.WalnutCreek,California:AltaMiraPress,149–176.<http://books.google.co.za/books?id=tjBMLQuVsBEC>
Windle,James/GrahamFarrell,2012:Poppingtheballooneffect:Assessingdruglawenforcementintermsofdisplacement,diffusion,andthecontainmenthypothesis.In:SubstanceUseandMisuse47,868-876.
Winick,Steven,2014:Believinginunicorns.<http://www.stevewinick.com/unicorns>(4September2014).
Winnick,Seth,2007:SaigoninsidersonCommunistPartypolitics.Wikileaks:Wikileaks.14February200714February2007.<https://www.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07HOCHIMINHCITY157_a.html>(17March2015).
Wisborg,Poul,etal.,2013:FarmworkersandfarmdwellersinLimpopo,SouthAfrica:Strugglesovertenure,livelihoodsandjustice.CapeTown:PLAAS.<http://www.plaas.org.za/sites/default/files/publications-pdf/Farmdwellers2013web.pdf>
418
Witter,Rebecca,2013:Elephant-induceddisplacementandthepowerofchoice:MoralnarrativesaboutresettlementinMozambique'sLimpopoNationalPark.In:ConservationandSociety11,406–419.
Wodarski,Alicia,2014:Capturingmarinewildlifepreservation.MichiganJournalofEnvironmentalandAdministrativeLaw.<http://www.mjeal-online.org/capturing-marine-wildlife-preservation/>(23December2014).
Wolmer,William,2003:Transboundaryconservation:ThepoliticsofecologicalintegrityintheGreatLimpopoTransfrontierPark.In:JournalofSouthernAfricanStudies29,261-278.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/3557419>
Wolmer,William,2005:Wildernessgained,wildernesslost:WildlifemanagementandlandoccupationsinZimbabwe'ssoutheastlowveld.In:JournalofHistoricalGeography31,260-280.<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305748805000319>
Wong,RebeccaW.Y.,2015:Anoteonfieldworkin‘dangerous’circumstances:interviewingillegaltigerskinsuppliersandtradersinLhasa.In:InternationalJournalofSocialResearchMethodology,1-8.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1020187>
Wong,RebeccaW.Y.,2013:TheorganisationoftheillegaltigerpartstradeinChina.Oxford:UniversityofOxford.
WorldHealthOrganisation/InternationalMedicalProductsAnti–CounterfeitingTaskforce,2012:Anti–counterfeittechnologiesfortheprotectionofmedicines.Geneva,Switzerland:WorldHealthOrganisation.<http://www.who.int/impact/events/IMPACT-ACTechnologiesv3LIS.pdf>.
Wray,Melissa,2014:FencebetweentheParkandLimpopoNatureReserve:KrugerNationalPark.<http://www.krugerpark.co.za/krugerpark-times-3-1-kruger-fence-21861.html>.
WWF,2015:Nepalachieves21percentincreaseinrhinonumbersandanotheryearofzeropoachingofrhinos.<https://www.worldwildlife.org/press-releases/nepal-achieves-21-percent-increase-in-rhino-numbers-and-another-year-of-zero-poaching-of-rhinos>(5May2015).
Wyatt,Tanya,2009:ExploringtheorganizationofRussiaFarEast’sillegalwildlifetrade:Twocasestudiesoftheillegalfurandillegalfalcontrades.In:GlobalCrime10,144-154.
Wyatt,Tanya,2011:TheillegaltradeofraptorsintheRussianFederation.In:ContemporaryJusticeReview14,103-123.
Yang,Sam2011:Areviewofrhinohorn.RhinoResourceCentre:FranklinW.OlinCollegeofEngineering.<http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/pdf_files/133/1331459082.pdf>
Yin,RobertK.,1994:Casestudyresearch:Designandmethods.ThousandOaks:SagePublications.
York,Geoffrey,2012:ThereturnoftheGoldenRhino.In:TheGlobeandMail.<http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/the-return-of-the-golden-rhino/article545513/?page=all>
Zabyelina,YuliyaG.,2014:The“fishy”business:aqualitativeanalysisoftheillicitmarketinblackcaviar.In:TrendsinOrganizedCrime,1-18.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12117-014-9214-z>
Zak,Annie,2015:Syntheticrhinohornmaker:It'snotcloning,exactly.In:PugetSoundBusinessJournal.<http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/print-edition/2015/02/06/synthetic-rhino-horn-maker-it-s-not-cloning.html?page=all>
Zelizer,Viviana,[1978]1992:Humanvaluesandthemarket:Thecaseoflifeinsuranceanddeathin19thcenturyAmerica.In:MarkGranovetter/RichardSwedberg(eds.),Thesociologyofeconomiclife.Boulder:WestviewPress,285-304.
419
Zelizer,Viviana1979:Moralsandmarkets:ThedevelopmentoflifeinsuranceintheUnitedStates.NewBrunswick:TransactionBooks.
Zelizer,VivianaA.,[1985]1994:Pricingthepricelesschild.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.
Zhang,Sheldon/Ko-LinChin,2002:Enterthedragon:InsideChinesehumansmugglingorganizationsIn:Criminology40,737–768.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00972.x>
Zhang,SheldonX./MarkS.Gaylord,1996:BoundfortheGoldenMountain:ThesocialorganizationofChinesealiensmuggling.In:Crime,LawandSocialChange25,1-16.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00227364>
Zinn,MaxineBaca,1979:Fieldresearchinminoritycommunities:Ethical,methodologicalandpoliticalobservationsbyaninsider.In:SocialProblems27,209-219.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/800369>
Zukin,Sharon,1993:Landscapesofpower:FromDetroittoDisneyWorld.LosAngeles:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.<https://books.google.co.za/books?id=YeeIrCiy0n8C>
The International Max Planck Research School on the Social
and Political Constitution of the Economy (IMPRS-SPCE) is a
joint international PhD Program of the Max Planck Institute for
the Study of Societies (MPIfG) and the Faculty of Management,
Economics and Social Sciences of the University of Cologne.
Its research explores the relation ship between the modern
economy and its social and political foundations. Building on a
long tradition in sociology and political science, the school aims
to combine and develop the approaches of new ecconomic
sociology, com parative political economy, organization studies,
and history. The Studies on the Social and Political Constitution
of the Economy are a doctoral thesis series featuring dissertations
by PhD students who have successfully completed the graduate
training program of the IMPRS-SPCE.
t