CanadianInstrumentation LocalTechnical User Forum(LTUF)

October 3rd & 4th 2007Liam WebsterDennis Cooley

October 13, 2009 – 2 –

Agenda

Review LTUF purpose

Review previous LTUF resultsCalgary, March 2007Sherwood Park, May 2007

Review other LTUFsHouston, August 2007

October 13, 2009 – 3 –

Mission Statement

The Canadian I&E LTUF is established forthe purpose of:

Ranking SmartPlant Instrumentation, andEERWAY change requests that will

improve the operation and function offuture versions.

Facilitating information exchange andsharing between local users.

October 13, 2009 – 4 –

Canadian LTUF Representatives 2004 - 2007

Agrium

Bantrel

CNRL

Colt

CoSyn

ENGlobal

Emerson

Fluor

Intergraph

Jacobs

Nova

Shell AlbianSands

Spartan

Suncor

Dow

Synenco

Suncor

Syncrude

Cosyn

IMV

Calgary Meetings Sherwood Park

October 13, 2009 – 5 –

LTUF - Calgary, March 2007

—Intergraph provided overview of some key newfeatures of SPI 2007– Allowing users to prepare for such things as:– Rule Manager– SmartLoop is no longer available– Infomaker 10 is to be used with SPI 2007

—Ranked change requests (CRs) from 1-10 (10being highest)– Examples:– (LTUF 2007)(10) Can't convert a Fieldbus or HART tag to aconventional tag after original creation– (LTUF 2004)(7) INtools to provide a batch PDF export utility

– Data Sheet PDF printing since v6.0

October 13, 2009 – 6 –

Intergraph’s CR filing

October 13, 2009 – 7 –

Intergraph’s CR filing

October 13, 2009 – 8 –

Follow-Up with Intergraph

—Are Canadian LTUF CRs being reviewed byIntergraph?– Dennis Cooley, Fred Pollard (Cosyn), Bill Bierman, John Dressel(Houston LTUF), and Liam Webster met with Alex Koifman(responsible for SPI product development)– Answer: YES! The application is influenced in 3 ways:1.LTUF Rankings2.CRs (ranked based on quantity of requests), Beta testing3.Business opportunity, Competitive analysis, Tools & technology

—Example of LTUF CR (from 2004) not beingimplemented:– (9) Can you add P&ID numbers to all Instrument Process DataSheets?– Answer: Many, many Process Module CRs and Intergraph islooking at larger Process Module revamp

October 13, 2009 – 9 –

LTUF - Sherwood Park, May 2007(Dennis Cooley)

—Focused on Owner / Operators - Sharing theirexperiences

– What is the SPI impact on your business?

– Owner Operator Setup e.g. structure, lifecycle considerations, concurrent

projects, merging & claiming

– Project Deliverable Expectations

– Project Deliverable Completion/Handover

– How SPI should be used to improve deliverables

– Next Owner/Operator focused LTUF meeting will be inFt McMurray, October 17, 2007. All are welcome.

October 13, 2009 – 10 –

LTUF – Houston, August 2007(Dennis Cooley)

—Overview of SmartPlant Instrumentation– Status of SmartPlant Instrumentation 2007 releases &service patches– SmartPlant Instrumentation Roadmap– SmartPlant Instrumentation Priority CR requests

—SPI Implementation and Legacy Data Migration at DowChemical

—Main Automation Contractor roles in SPI– Main Automation Contractor utilization of SmartPlant Instrumentation

– Open forum on MAC and EPC Work Sharing

October 13, 2009 – 11 –

LTUF – Houston, August 2007(Dennis Cooley)

—Using SmartPlant Instrumentation to Document SafetyInstrumented Systems

—Forum Topics– Using SmartPlant Instrumentation over Terminal Server

– Citrix vs. MSTS

– Remote Admin and Import Module

– Remote Printing and Drive Mapping issues

– SPI Licensing for Remote Users

– SmartPlant Instrumentation Workarounds

– EPC use of Owner Operator Domain Setup

October 13, 2009 – 12 –

Summary

LTUF purposeWe are fulfilling our mission statement

Previous LTUF resultsCR’s are being heard by IntergraphAlways want more from Intergraph

Owner/Operator meetings being initiated in otherlocations

Other LTUFsHouston LTUF focused on sharing information

October 13, 2009 – 13 –

Questions&

Answers