Thesis defence-Shahriar Parvez
Transcript of Thesis defence-Shahriar Parvez
A PROPOSAL OF AN EFFICIENT NETWORK MODEL FOR
UNIVERSITY OF LIBERAL ARTS BANGLADESHA NETWORK ARCHITECTURE MODEL FOR
UNIVERSITY CAMPUS
1
Submitted byH. M. Shahriar Parvez
ID: 102014004Department of CSE
SupervisorMahmood JasimJr. LecturerDepartment of CSE
Co-SupervisorSajib RoyLecturerDepartment of ETE
THIS PRESENTATION COVERS….
Introduction Existing system and its discussion Proposed system and its discussion Result Future Scope
2
WHY WIRELESS NETWORK?It’s becoming popular at home and office day by day.Don’t require any wire to establish wireless network
Mobility Faster installation Wide network facility More adaptability Cost effective Easy extendibility.
3
WIRELESS NETWORK Either requires radio wave or microwave to
maintain inter channel of a node Wi-Fi Technology Ad hoc, Infrastructure mode Signal strength up to 100 feet Maximum network speed depends on the Wi-Fi
Standard
4
PROPERTIES OF EXISTING SYSTEMProperties
ULAB Network
SystemWeb server
Yes
DNS Server
No
Own Mail Server
No
DHCP Server
No
FTP server
No
Wireless network
Yes
Security
Windows Server 2008
MAC Address
Filtering with
Bandwidth
No
6Table: Properties of the Existing System
DRAWBACKSHigh cost: Whole network is connected in wires and a wired network is more expensive than wireless network.Disordered network: LAN and WLAN are in same subnet mask. Therefore, the network is too big to handle with bandwidth sharing.Security issues: University of Liberal Arts gives Domain Control Security for LAN network. It is using Windows Server 2008 which includes essential security for maintaining a whole network. No own server: ULAB is thinking of establishing own DHCP, Mail and DNS server.No bandwidth filtering: Currently ULAB is working on speed filtering method. No user cannot get more than 1mbps speed.
7
PROPERTIES OF PROPOSED SYSTEMProperties
Proposed Network
SystemWeb server
Yes
DNS Server
Yes
Own Mail Server
Yes
DHCP Server
Yes
FTP server
Yes
Wireless network
Yes
Security
Three levels
security
MAC Address
Filtering with
Bandwidth
Yes 9Table: Properties of the Proposed System
COMPARISON BETWEEN EXISTING SYSTEM AND PROPOSED SYSTEM
Properties Existing System Proposed System
Web server
Yes Yes
DNS Server
No Yes
Own Mail Server
No Yes
DHCP Server No Yes
FTP server
No Yes
Wireless network
Yes Yes
Security
Windows Server 2008 WPA-2
MAC Address Filtering
with Bandwidth
No Yes 10Table: Comparison between existing system and proposed system
ServerI. DNSII. WebIII.DHCPIV. CloudV. Mail DevicesI. RouterII. Wireless RouterIII.Wireless Access PointIV. Wireless Network AdapterV. SwitchVI. Wireless Range Extender
11
REQUIRED DEVICES FOR DESIGNING THE PROPOSED SYSTEM
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM IN CISCO PACKET TRACER
12Figure: Implementation of the Proposed System
REQUIRED MECHANISM FOR DESIGNING THE PROPOSED SYSTEM
Routing Information Protocol (RIP)
Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN)
IP Access Control List (IP ACL)
MAC Address Filtering
13
RESULTPropertie
s
LAN Approxima
te round
trip
time(RTT)
Approxima
te Time
to Live
(TTL)
WLAN Approximate
round trip
time
Approximate
Time to Live
(TTL)
Host to
Router1
Sent
4,
Receiv
ed 4
0 ms 255 Sent
4,
Receiv
ed 4
14 ms 254
Host to
Web
Server
Sent
4,
Receiv
ed 4
7 ms 126 Sent
4,
Receiv
ed 4
18 ms 126
Host to
Host
Sent
4,
Receiv
ed 4
0 ms 128Sent
4,
Receiv
ed 4
14 ms 128 14Table: Result
FUTURE SCOPE
Malicious Node Detection Repeater or Network
Extender MAC Address Filtering Cloud Server
15